Filed Pursuant to Rule 424b5 Registration No. 333-52204 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +The information in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus + +is not complete and may be changed. This prospectus supplement and the + +accompanying prospectus are not offers to sell these securities and we are + +not soliciting offers to buy these securities in any state where the offer or + +sale is not permitted. + ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Subject to Completion PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT Issued March 2, 2001 (To Prospectus dated December 26, 2000) 25,000,000 Shares Common Stock ----------- Duke Energy Corporation is offering 25,000,000 shares of common stock. Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the trading symbol "DUK." On March 2, 2001, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NYSE was $40.49 per share. Concurrently with this offering of common stock, we are also offering (by a separate prospectus supplement) $500 million aggregate principal amount of Equity Units consisting of senior notes of our wholly owned subsidiary, Duke Capital Corporation, and contracts to purchase additional shares of our common stock on , 2004. Neither offering is contingent upon the closing of the other offering. ----------- Price to Underwriting Proceeds to Public Discount Duke Energy -------- ------------ ----------- Per Share..................................... $ $ $ Total......................................... $ $ $ We have granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 3,750,000 additional shares at the price to the public less the underwriting discount to cover over-allotments. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. Delivery of the shares of common stock is expected to be made on or about March , 2001. ----------- Joint Book-Running Managers Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Merrill Lynch & Co. ----------- Banc of America Securities LLC Credit Suisse First Boston Goldman, Sachs & Co. JPMorgan UBS Warburg LLC ----------- The date of this prospectus supplement is March , 2001. You should rely only on the information contained in or incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different. We are not making an offer of these securities in any state where the offer is not permitted. You should not assume that the information provided by or incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date of the document containing the information. ---------------- TABLE OF CONTENTS Prospectus Supplement Page ---- About this Prospectus Supplement......................................... ii Forward-Looking Statements............................................... S-1 Prospectus Supplement Summary............................................ S-2 Use of Proceeds.......................................................... S-7 Price Range of Common Stock.............................................. S-8 Dividends................................................................ S-8 Capitalization........................................................... S-9 Selected Financial Information........................................... S-10 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition..................................................... S-11 Business................................................................. S-31 Management............................................................... S-37 United States Federal Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. Holders of Common Stock................................................................... S-38 Underwriting............................................................. S-40 Experts.................................................................. S-43 Legal Matters............................................................ S-43 Index to Financial Statements ........................................... F-1 Prospectus Page ---- About this Prospectus.................................................... 2 Duke Energy Corporation.................................................. 2 Use of Proceeds.......................................................... 4 The Trusts............................................................... 4 Accounting Treatment..................................................... 5 Description of the Senior Notes.......................................... 5 Description of the Junior Subordinated Notes............................. 15 Description of the First and Refunding Mortgage Bonds.................... 24 Description of the Common Stock.......................................... 28 Description of the Stock Purchase Contracts and the Stock Purchase Units................................................................... 31 Description of the Preferred Securities.................................. 32 Description of the Guarantees............................................ 33 Plan of Distribution..................................................... 36 Experts.................................................................. 38 Validity of the Securities............................................... 38 Where You Can Find More Information...................................... 38 i ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT This document is in two parts. The first part is this prospectus supplement, which describes the specific terms of this common stock offering. The second part, the accompanying prospectus, gives more general information, some of which may not apply to this offering. If the description of the offering varies between this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus, you should rely on the information in this prospectus supplement. Unless we have indicated otherwise, or the context otherwise requires, references in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus to "Duke Energy," "we," "us" and "our" or similar terms are to Duke Energy Corporation and its subsidiaries. ii FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus contain or incorporate by reference statements that do not directly or exclusively relate to historical facts. Such statements are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can typically identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking words, such as "may," "will," "could," "project," "believe," "anticipate," "expect," "estimate," "continue," "potential," "plan," "forecast" and the like. Those statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Many of those factors are outside our control and could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. Those factors include: . state, federal and foreign legislative and regulatory initiatives that affect cost and investment recovery, have an impact on rate structures, and affect the speed at and degree to which competition enters the electric and natural gas industries; . industrial, commercial and residential growth in our service territories or the service territories of our subsidiaries; . the weather and other natural phenomena; . the timing and extent of changes in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates; . changes in environmental and other laws and regulations to which we and our subsidiaries are subject or other external factors over which we have no control; . the results of financing efforts, including our ability to obtain financing on favorable terms, which can be affected by various factors, including our credit ratings and general economic conditions; . growth in opportunities for our business units; and . the effect of accounting policies issued periodically by accounting standard-setting bodies. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events referred to in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus might not occur. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. S-1 PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT SUMMARY The following is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read together with, the more detailed information and financial statements included or incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. Unless otherwise indicated, all of the following information assumes that the underwriters have not exercised their option to purchase up to an additional 3,750,000 shares of common stock within 30 days of the date of this prospectus supplement. Duke Energy Corporation We are a leading integrated energy and energy services provider with the ability to offer physical delivery and management of both electricity and natural gas throughout the United States and abroad. We own and operate one of the world's largest portfolios of generating plants, one of the nation's largest natural gas pipeline systems and one of the most active energy trading and marketing operations. We are also the largest producer of natural gas liquids, or NGLs, in the United States. Our integrated approach to building regional energy businesses allows us to leverage the strengths of these businesses and allows us to earn both higher operating margins and greater returns on our portfolio of energy assets. The services and products we provide are offered through the following seven business segments: . Franchised Electric generates, transmits, distributes and sells electric energy in central and western North Carolina and the western portion of South Carolina. Its operations are conducted primarily through Duke Power and Nantahala Power and Light. We currently operate 17,755 net megawatts, or MW, of generation capacity and serve approximately two million customers in the Carolinas. . Natural Gas Transmission provides interstate transportation and storage of natural gas for customers primarily in the Mid-Atlantic, New England and southeastern states. We currently have 12,000 miles of natural gas pipelines and transport approximately 25% of the natural gas consumption of the eastern United States. These operations are conducted primarily through Duke Energy Gas Transmission Corporation. . Field Services gathers, processes, transports, markets and stores natural gas and produces, transports, markets and stores NGLs. Its operations are conducted primarily through Duke Energy Field Services, LLC, which has a presence in each of the major gas-producing regions of the United States. We currently own and operate approximately 57,000 miles of natural gas gathering systems and 68 natural gas processing plants in the United States and Canada and one high-deliverability natural gas storage facility in the United States. . North American Wholesale Energy, or NAWE, is involved in the development, operation and management of power generation facilities, primarily through Duke Energy North America, LLC and commodity sales and services related to natural gas and electricity, primarily through Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, LLC. Our current merchant generation portfolio totals approximately 6,200 MW, and we have under construction approximately 3,200 MW for operation in 2001 and approximately 4,100 MW for operation in 2002. In addition to our facilities in operation or under construction, we have approximately 13,500 MW in advanced development scheduled to begin operation between 2002 and 2004. NAWE also includes Duke Energy Merchants, which develops new business lines in the evolving energy commodity markets. . International Energy is involved in the development, operation and management of natural gas and power generation facilities and energy trading and marketing of natural gas and electricity. Its operations are conducted through Duke Energy International, LLC, and its activities are targeted in Latin America, Asia Pacific and Europe. Our current operating portfolio includes approximately 5,100 MW of power generation facilities and approximately 1,700 miles of natural gas pipelines. . Other Energy Services is a combination of businesses that provide engineering, consulting, construction and integrated energy solutions worldwide, primarily through Duke Engineering & Services, Inc., Duke/Fluor Daniel and DukeSolutions, Inc. S-2 . Duke Ventures is comprised of other diverse businesses. Crescent Resources, Inc. develops high-quality commercial, residential and multi- family real estate projects and manages land holdings primarily in the southeastern United States. DukeNet Communications, Inc. provides fiber optic networks for industrial, commercial and residential customers. Duke Capital Partners provides financing, investment banking and asset management services to wholesale and commercial energy markets. Business Strategy Our strategy is to develop and actively manage integrated energy businesses in targeted regions where our extensive capabilities in developing energy assets, operating electric power, natural gas and NGLs plants, optimizing commercial operations and managing risk can provide comprehensive energy solutions for our customers and create value for our shareholders. The key elements of our strategy include: Pursue growth opportunities in deregulating and liberalizing markets. The growth in and restructuring of global energy markets are providing opportunities for our business segments to capitalize on their comprehensive capabilities. Domestically, we are aggressively investing in new merchant power facilities throughout the United States, expanding our natural gas pipeline infrastructure in the eastern United States, rapidly increasing our leading position in natural gas processing and NGLs marketing and developing our trading, marketing and structured origination expertise across the energy spectrum. Internationally, we are focusing on integrated electric and natural gas opportunities in markets such as Latin America, Asia Pacific and Europe, where deregulation, privatization and liberalization are opening energy markets to competition. Develop and integrate regional energy businesses in target markets. We currently own and operate assets and provide services ranging from natural gas gathering to trading and marketing of energy to the distribution of electricity to customers. Through our integrated energy network of natural gas and electric power assets coupled with trading and marketing, we are able to maximize the returns of our energy portfolio. This is accomplished by creating an environment that enables the more efficient flow of information between our trading and marketing business and our merchant businesses that own and operate these physical assets. These enhanced returns are achieved through timely communication of information regarding dispatch and maintenance of generation plants, commodity positions for natural gas and electricity, forward pricing curves and other market knowledge. Our integrated approach to building regional energy businesses enables us to choose the best times to enter or exit a market and effectively manage and grow our business. Actively manage our asset portfolio. We utilize a portfolio management strategy, rather than focusing on stand-alone projects or assets, that strives to capture the greatest value by seeking opportunities to invest in energy assets in markets that have capacity needs and to divest other assets when significant value can be realized. This strategy enables us to monetize certain assets and redeploy the capital to higher-return assets in target markets. Additionally, this strategy prevents the institutionalized ownership of any asset by encouraging us to continually review our asset portfolio. Mitigate exposure through disciplined risk management policies. Through our enterprise risk management group, which is led by our Chief Risk Officer, a newly created position, we actively manage the risks that our business segments face. We believe managing risk at the corporate level is consistent with the portfolio approach we use with our assets. Our risk management policies are designed to help determine lines of business offering attractive risk returns, assess current and future risk/return characteristics of the enterprise and recommend appropriate strategic modifications. We actively manage our commodity, interest rate, foreign currency and credit risks through established policies that limit our exposure and require daily reporting to management of potential financial exposure. Our risk management policies are designed to mitigate our downside exposures while complementing the operations of each of our business segments. S-3 Recent Developments California Wholesale Electricity Market As a result of high prices in the western U.S. wholesale electricity markets in 2000, several state and federal regulatory investigations and complaints have commenced to determine the causes of the prices and potentially to recommend remedial action. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) concluded its investigation by issuing on December 15, 2000 an Order Directing Remedies in the California Wholesale Electricity Markets. In its conclusion, the FERC found no basis in allegations made by government officials in California that specific electric generators artificially drove up power prices. This conclusion is consistent with similar findings by the Compliance Unit of the California Power Exchange (CalPX) and the Northwest Power Planning Council. The FERC order is the subject of numerous rehearing requests. At the state level, the California Public Utilities Commission, the California Electricity Oversight Board, the California Bureau of State Audits and the California Office of the Attorney General all have separate ongoing investigations into the high prices and their causes. None of those investigations has been completed, and no findings have been made in connection with any of them. California Litigation Duke Energy North America and Duke Energy Trading and Marketing have been named among 16 defendants in a class action lawsuit (the Gordon lawsuit) filed against companies identified as "generators and traders" of electricity in California markets. Duke Energy Trading and Marketing also was named as one of numerous defendants in four additional lawsuits, including two class actions (the Hendricks and Pier 23 Restaurant lawsuits), filed against generators, marketers and traders and other unnamed providers of electricity in California markets. These suits were brought either by or on behalf of electricity consumers in the State of California. The Gordon and Hendricks class action suits were filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, San Diego County in November 2000. The other three suits were filed in January 2001, one in the Superior Court of the State of California, San Diego County, and the other two in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco. These suits generally allege that the defendants manipulated the wholesale electricity markets in violation of state laws against unfair and unlawful business practices and state antitrust laws. Plaintiffs in the Gordon suit seek aggregate damages of over $4 billion, and the plaintiffs in the other suits, to the extent damages are specified, allege damages in excess of $1 billion. The lawsuits each seek the disgorgement of alleged unlawfully obtained revenues for sales of electricity and, in three suits, an award of treble damages. California Utilities Defaults and Other Proceedings Two California electric utilities recently defaulted on many of their obligations to suppliers and creditors. NAWE supplies electric power to these utilities directly and indirectly through contracts through the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) and the CalPX. NAWE also supplies natural gas to these utilities under direct contracts. With respect to electric power sales through the CAISO and CalPX, we quantified our exposures at December 31, 2000 to these utilities and recorded a $110 million provision. As a result of these defaults and certain related government actions, we have taken a number of steps, including initiating court actions, to mitigate our exposure. While these matters referenced above are in their earliest stages, our management does not believe, based on its analysis to date of the factual background and the claims asserted in these matters, that their resolution will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. S-4 The Offering Common stock offered................................ 25,000,000 shares Common stock to be outstanding immediately after the offering........................................... 764,293,886 shares Use of proceeds..................................... General corporate purposes, including repayment of short-term indebtedness. NYSE symbol......................................... DUK The number of shares of common stock offered and to be outstanding immediately after this offering does not include 3,750,000 shares of common stock that the underwriters have an option to purchase from us within 30 days of the date of this prospectus supplement. The number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately after this offering also does not include shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options, which constituted 22,506,022 shares as of December 31, 2000. Concurrently with this offering of common stock, we are also offering (by a separate prospectus supplement) $500 million aggregate principal amount of Equity Units consisting of senior notes of our wholly owned subsidiary, Duke Capital Corporation, and contracts to purchase additional shares of our common stock. We have not yet priced the Equity Units offering. Subject to market conditions, we expect to price and close the Equity Units offering at the same time this offering is priced and closed. S-5 Summary Consolidated Financial Information The summary of consolidated financial information set forth below should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and with "Selected Financial Information" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition" included elsewhere in this prospectus supplement and with the documents incorporated by reference in the accompanying prospectus. Years Ended December 31, -------------------------- 2000(1) 1999(2) 1998 ------- --------- ------- (in millions, except per share data) Consolidated Statements of Income Data: Operating revenues................................. $49,318 $21,766 $17,662 Earnings before interest and taxes................. 4,014 2,043 2,647 Earnings available for common stockholders......... 1,757 1,487(3) 1,231 Weighted-average common shares outstanding(4)...... 736 729 722 Earnings per common share (before extraordinary item)(4) Basic............................................ $ 2.39 $ 1.13 $ 1.72 Diluted.......................................... 2.38 1.13 1.71 Earnings per common share(4) Basic............................................ 2.39 2.04(3) 1.70 Diluted.......................................... 2.38 2.03(3) 1.70 Dividends per common share(4)...................... 1.10 1.10 1.10 As of December 31, 2000 ----------------- Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: Total assets................................................ $ 58,176 Short-term debt, including commercial paper................. 1,826 Long-term debt, including current maturities................ 11,456 Guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in subordinated notes of Duke Energy or subsidiaries....................... 1,406 Minority interests.......................................... 2,435 Preferred and preference stock, including current sinking fund obligations........................................... 280 Common stockholders' equity................................. 10,056 - -------- (1) Reflects a pre-tax $407 million gain on the sale of our investment in BellSouth PCS. The effect per basic share of common stock of this gain was $0.34. (2) Reflects a pre-tax $800 million charge for estimated injury and damages claims. The effect per basic share of common stock of this charge was $0.67. (3) Reflects a one-time after-tax extraordinary gain of approximately $660 million, or $0.91 per basic share of common stock, attributable to the sale of certain pipeline operations on March 29, 1999. (4) Restated to reflect the two-for-one common stock split effective January 26, 2001. S-6 USE OF PROCEEDS Our net proceeds from the sale of the 25,000,000 shares of our common stock in this offering are estimated to be $ million ($ million if the underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full) after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses. We expect to use the net proceeds from the offering of common stock for general corporate purposes, including repayment of short-term indebtedness. Concurrently with this offering, we are offering $500 million aggregate principal amount of Equity Units consisting of senior notes of our wholly owned subsidiary, Duke Capital Corporation, and contracts to purchase additional shares of our common stock. Neither offering is contingent upon the closing of the other offering. The net proceeds from the sale of $500 million aggregate principal amount of Equity Units in the concurrent offering will be $ million ($ million if the underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full) after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses. Duke Capital expects to use the net proceeds from the offering of Equity Units for general corporate purposes, including repayment of short-term indebtedness. S-7 PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK Our common stock trades on the NYSE under the symbol "DUK." The following table sets forth on a per share basis the high and low closing sales prices for our common stock for the periods indicated as reported on the NYSE composite transactions reporting system. We effected a two-for-one common stock split on January 26, 2001 payable to holders of record on January 3, 2001. The prices set forth below reflect adjustment for that stock split. High Low ------ ------ 1999 First Quarter............................................. $32.34 $27.41 Second Quarter............................................ 30.59 26.06 Third Quarter............................................. 29.25 26.22 Fourth Quarter............................................ 28.44 23.53 2000 First Quarter............................................. 28.94 23.19 Second Quarter............................................ 31.25 26.16 Third Quarter............................................. 42.88 28.31 Fourth Quarter............................................ 44.97 40.22 2001 First Quarter (through March 2, 2001)..................... 42.90 32.41 The last reported sale price of our common stock on March 2, 2001 on the NYSE is set forth on the cover page of this prospectus supplement. As of February 28, 2001, there were approximately 148,000 holders of record of our common stock. DIVIDENDS We have paid cash dividends on our common stock without interruption since 1926. We paid a quarterly dividend of $0.275 per share in each of 1999 and 2000 and expect to pay a quarterly dividend of $0.275 per share on March 16, 2001 to holders of record on February 16, 2001. Purchasers of the common stock offered hereby will not be entitled to receive that quarterly dividend. Future dividends will depend upon our future earnings, financial condition and other factors affecting dividend policy. We have an InvestorDirect Choice Plan pursuant to which holders of our common stock may automatically reinvest their common stock dividends in shares of our common stock. Holders who become participants in the plan may also make optional cash payments (not more than $100,000 per calendar year) to be invested in shares of our common stock. For information concerning the InvestorDirect Choice Plan, write us at Duke Energy Corporation, Investor Relations Department, P.O. Box 1005, Charlotte, NC 28201-1005. S-8 CAPITALIZATION The following table sets forth our capitalization as of December 31, 2000: . on an actual basis; and . on an as adjusted basis to give effect to the sale of the 25,000,000 shares of our common stock offered by this prospectus supplement at a public offering price of $ per share and the $500 million aggregate principal amount of Equity Units consisting of senior notes of Duke Capital Corporation and contracts to purchase additional shares of our common stock in the concurrent offering and the application of the net proceeds from these sales, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses. You should read the information in this table together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and with "Selected Financial Information" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition" included elsewhere in this prospectus supplement. December 31, 2000 ----------------- As Actual Adjusted ------- -------- (in millions) Short-term debt, including commercial paper............. $ 1,826 $ ------- ----- Long-term debt, including current maturities: First and refunding mortgage bonds.................... 1,451 1,451 Other long-term debt.................................. 2,468 2,468 Long-term debt of subsidiaries........................ 7,537 7,537 Senior notes of Duke Capital due 2006 (component of Equity Units)........................................ -- ------- ----- Total long-term debt................................ 11,456 ------- ----- Guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in subordinated notes of Duke Energy or subsidiaries...... 1,406 1,406 ------- ----- Minority interests...................................... 2,435 2,435 ------- ----- Preferred and preference stock, including current sinking fund obligations: With sinking fund requirements........................ 71 71 Without sinking fund requirements..................... 209 209 ------- ----- 280 280 ------- ----- Common stockholders' equity: Common stock, no par; 1 billion shares authorized; 739 million shares outstanding, actual and 764 million shares outstanding, as adjusted.......... 4,797 Retained earnings..................................... 5,379 5,379 Accumulated other comprehensive income................ (120) (120) ------- ----- Total common stockholders' equity................... 10,056 ------- ----- Total capitalization.............................. $27,459 $ ======= ===== S-9 SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial information for each of the periods indicated. You should read the information in this table together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition" included elsewhere in this prospectus supplement and with the documents incorporated by reference in the accompanying prospectus. Years Ended December 31, ----------------------------------- 2000(1) 1999(2) 1998 ---------- ---------- ---------- (in millions, except per share data) Consolidated Statements of Income Data: Operating revenues........................ $ 49,318 $ 21,766 $ 17,662 Operating expenses........................ 45,505 19,947 15,177 ---------- ---------- ---------- Operating income........................ 3,813 1,819 2,485 Other income, net......................... 201 224 162 ---------- ---------- ---------- Earnings before interest and taxes........ 4,014 2,043 2,647 Interest expense.......................... 911 601 514 Minority interest expense................. 307 142 96 Income before extraordinary item.......... 1,776 847 1,260 Net income................................ 1,776 1,507(3) 1,252 Earnings available for common stockholders............................. 1,757 1,487(3) 1,231 Earnings per share of common stock (before extraordinary item)(4) Basic................................... $ 2.39 $ 1.13 $ 1.72 Diluted................................. 2.38 1.13 1.71 Earnings per share of common stock(4) Basic................................... 2.39 2.04(3) 1.70 Diluted................................. 2.38 2.03(3) 1.70 - -------- (1) Reflects a pre-tax $407 million gain on the sale of our investment in BellSouth PCS. The effect per basic share of common stock of this gain was $0.34. (2) Reflects a pre-tax $800 million charge for estimated injury and damages claims. The effect per basic share of common stock of this charge was $0.67. (3) Reflects a one-time after-tax extraordinary gain of approximately $660 million, or $0.91 per basic share of common stock, attributable to the sale of certain pipeline operations on March 29, 1999. (4) Restated to reflect the two-for-one common stock split effective January 26, 2001. As of December 31, ----------------------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ---------- ----------- ---------- (in millions) Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: Current assets............................ $ 22,155 $ 6,171 $ 4,843 Investments and other assets.............. 10,082 4,710 3,232 Property, plant and equipment, net........ 24,469 20,995 16,875 Regulatory assets and deferred debits..... 1,470 1,533 1,856 Total assets.............................. 58,176 33,409 26,806 Years Ended December 31, ------------------------------ 2000 1999 1998 1997(1) 1996(1) ---- ---- ---- ------- ------- Financial Ratios: Ratio of earnings to fixed charges............... 3.8 2.9 4.7 4.1 4.3 - -------- (1) Data reflects accounting for the combination with PanEnergy Corp on June 18, 1997 as a pooling of interests. As a result, the data gives effect to the combination as if it had occurred as of January 1, 1996. For purposes of this ratio (a) earnings consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes and fixed charges, and (b) fixed charges consist of all interest deductions and the interest component of rentals. S-10 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION Introduction Management's Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements. Business Segments. Duke Energy Corporation (collectively with its subsidiaries, "Duke Energy") is an integrated energy and energy services provider with the ability to offer physical delivery and management of both electricity and natural gas throughout the U.S. and abroad. Duke Energy provides these and other services through seven business segments. Franchised Electric generates, transmits, distributes and sells electric energy in central and western North Carolina and the western portion of South Carolina. Its operations are conducted primarily through Duke Power and Nantahala Power and Light. These electric operations are subject to the rules and regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the North Carolina Utilities Commission (NCUC) and the Public Service Commission of South Carolina (PSCSC). Natural Gas Transmission provides interstate transportation and storage of natural gas for customers primarily in the Mid-Atlantic, New England and southeastern states. Its operations are conducted primarily through Duke Energy Gas Transmission Corporation. The interstate natural gas transmission and storage operations are subject to the rules and regulations of the FERC. Field Services gathers, processes, transports, markets and stores natural gas and produces, transports, markets and stores natural gas liquids (NGLs). Its operations are conducted primarily through Duke Energy Field Services, LLC (DEFS), a limited liability company that is approximately 30% owned by Phillips Petroleum. Field Services operates gathering systems in western Canada and 11 contiguous states that serve major natural gas-producing regions in the Rocky Mountain, Permian Basin, Mid-Continent, East Texas-Austin Chalk-North Louisiana, as well as onshore and offshore Gulf Coast areas. North American Wholesale Energy's (NAWE's) activities include asset development, operation and management, primarily through Duke Energy North America, LLC (DENA), and commodity sales and services related to natural gas and power, primarily through Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, LLC (DETM). DETM is a limited liability company that is approximately 40% owned by Exxon Mobil Corporation. NAWE also includes Duke Energy Merchants, which develops new business lines in the evolving energy commodity markets. NAWE conducts its business throughout the U.S. and Canada. The operations of the previously segregated Trading and Marketing segment were combined by management into NAWE during 2000. Previous periods have been restated to conform to current period presentation. International Energy conducts its operations through Duke Energy International, LLC. International Energy's activities include asset development, operation and management of natural gas and power facilities and energy trading and marketing of natural gas and electric power. This activity is targeted in the Latin American, Asia Pacific and European regions. Other Energy Services is a combination of businesses that provide engineering, consulting, construction and integrated energy solutions worldwide, primarily through Duke Engineering & Services, Inc. (DE&S), Duke/Fluor Daniel (D/FD) and DukeSolutions, Inc. (DukeSolutions). D/FD is a 50/50 partnership between Duke Energy and Fluor Enterprises, Inc. Duke Ventures is comprised of other diverse businesses, primarily operating through Crescent Resources, Inc. (Crescent), DukeNet Communications, LLC (DukeNet) and Duke Capital Partners (DCP). Crescent develops high-quality commercial, residential and multi-family real estate projects and manages land holdings S-11 primarily in the southeastern U.S. DukeNet provides fiber optic networks for industrial, commercial and residential customers. DCP, a newly formed, wholly owned merchant finance company, provides financing, investment banking and asset management services to wholesale and commercial energy markets. Business Strategy. Duke Energy is one of the world's leading integrated energy companies. The company's business strategy is to develop integrated energy businesses in targeted regions where Duke Energy's extensive capabilities in developing energy assets, operating electric power, natural gas and NGL plants, optimizing commercial operations and managing risk can provide comprehensive energy solutions for customers and create superior value for shareholders. The growth in and restructuring of global energy markets are providing opportunities for Duke Energy's competitive business segments to capitalize on their comprehensive capabilities. Domestically, Duke Energy is aggressively investing in new merchant power plants throughout the U.S., expanding its natural gas pipeline infrastructure in the eastern U.S., rapidly increasing its leading position in natural gas gathering and processing and NGL marketing, and developing its trading and marketing structured origination expertise across the energy spectrum. Internationally, Duke Energy is currently focusing on integrated electric and natural gas opportunities in Latin America, Asia Pacific and Europe. Franchised Electric continues to add customers, maintain low costs and deliver high-quality customer service. Franchised Electric is expected to grow moderately, consistent with historical trends. Expansion will primarily result from continued economic growth in its service territory. Natural Gas Transmission has increased its earnings growth rate by executing a comprehensive strategy of selected acquisitions and expansions and by developing expanded services and incremental projects that meet changing customer needs. Field Services has developed market-leading size, scope and reliability of supply in natural gas gathering, processing and NGL marketing. Field Services plans to make additional investments in gathering, processing and NGL infrastructure. Field Services' interconnected natural gas processing operations provide an opportunity to capture fee-based investment opportunities in certain NGL assets, including pipelines, fractionators and terminals. NAWE plans to continue increasing earnings through acquisitions, divestitures, construction of greenfield projects and expansion of existing facilities as regional opportunities are identified, evaluated and realized throughout the North American marketplace. To capture the greatest value in the U.S., DENA, through its portfolio management strategy, seeks opportunities to invest in energy assets in markets that have capacity needs and to divest other assets, in whole or in part, when significant value can be realized. Commodity sales and services related to natural gas and power continue to expand as NAWE provides energy supply, structured origination, trading and marketing, risk management and commercial optimization services to large energy customers, energy aggregators and other wholesale companies. International Energy plans to continue expanding through acquisitions, divestitures, construction of greenfield projects and expansion of existing facilities in selected international regions. International Energy's combination of assets and capabilities and close working relationships with other subsidiaries of Duke Energy allow it to efficiently deliver natural gas pipeline, power generation, energy marketing and other services. Other Energy Services plans to grow by providing an expanding customer base with a variety of engineering and energy efficiency services that allow customers to more effectively deal with rapidly changing conditions in the energy marketplace. Duke Ventures plans to expand earnings capabilities in its real estate, telecommunications and capital financing business units by developing regional opportunities and by applying extensive experience to new project development. Duke Energy's business strategy and growth expectations can vary significantly depending on many factors, including, but not limited to, the pace and direction of industry restructuring, regulatory constraints, acquisition opportunities, market volatility and economic trends. However, Duke Energy's growth expectations do not rely on industry restructuring in North Carolina and South Carolina. S-12 Results of Operations In 2000, earnings available for common stockholders were $1,757 million, or $2.39 per basic share, including a pre-tax gain of $407 million, or an after- tax gain of $0.34 per basic share, on the sale of Duke Energy's 20% interest in BellSouth Carolina PCS (BellSouth PCS). In 1999, earnings available for common stockholders were $1,487 million, or $2.04 per basic share, including an after- tax extraordinary gain of $660 million, or $0.91 per basic share resulting from the sale of the Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company (PEPL), Trunkline Gas Company (Trunkline) and additional storage related to those systems, which substantially comprised the Midwest Pipelines along with Trunkline LNG Company. The increase in earnings available for common stockholders in 2000 was primarily due to a 96% increase in segment earnings as described below, including the BellSouth PCS gain. Partially offsetting this increase was the 1999 extraordinary gain and higher interest and minority interest expense in the current year. Earnings available for common stockholders increased $256 million in 1999 from 1998 earnings of $1,231 million, or $1.70 per basic share. The increase in earnings available for common stockholders was primarily due to the 1999 extraordinary gain resulting from the sale of the Midwest Pipelines. This gain, along with the factors described below that affect segment earnings, was partially offset by a pre-tax $800 million charge for estimated injury and damages claims (see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and higher interest and minority interest expense. Earnings per share information provided above has been restated to reflect the two-for-one common stock split effective January 26, 2001. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Operating income for 2000 was $3,813 million compared to $1,819 million in 1999 and $2,485 million in 1998. Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) were $4,014 million, $2,043 million and $2,647 million for 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Management evaluates each business segment based on an internal measure of EBIT, after deducting minority interests. Operating income and EBIT are affected by the same fluctuations for Duke Energy and each of its business segments. The only notable difference between operating income and EBIT is the inclusion in EBIT of certain non-operating activities. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on business segments. EBIT is summarized in the following table and is discussed by business segment thereafter. EBIT by Business Segment Years Ended December 31, ---------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ------ ------ ------ (in millions) Franchised Electric..................................... $1,704 $ 856 $1,513 Natural Gas Transmission................................ 534 627 702 Field Services.......................................... 296 144 76 North American Wholesale Energy......................... 418 209 133 International Energy.................................... 331 42 12 Other Energy Services................................... (61) (94) 10 Duke Ventures........................................... 563 162 122 Other Operations........................................ (2) 5 22 EBIT attributable to minority interests................. 231 92 57 ------ ------ ------ Consolidated EBIT....................................... $4,014 $2,043 $2,647 ====== ====== ====== Other Operations primarily include certain unallocated corporate costs. Included in the amounts discussed hereafter are intercompany transactions that are eliminated in the Consolidated Financial Statements. S-13 Franchised Electric Years Ended December 31, -------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ------ ------ ------ (In millions, except where noted) Operating revenues........................................ $4,946 $4,700 $4,626 Operating expenses........................................ 3,316 3,966 3,228 ------ ------ ------ Operating income.......................................... 1,630 734 1,398 Other income, net of expenses............................. 74 122 115 ------ ------ ------ EBIT...................................................... $1,704 $ 856 $1,513 ====== ====== ====== Sales--GWh(a)............................................. 84,766 81,548 82,011 - -------- (a) Gigawatt-hours. Franchised Electric's EBIT increased $848 million in 2000 when compared to 1999, primarily due to an $800 million charge in 1999 for estimated injury and damages claims (see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). Overall favorable weather and growth in customers, partially offset by increased operating costs, also contributed to this increase in EBIT. The average number of customers in Franchised Electric's service territory increased 2.5% during 2000. Total gigawatt-hour sales to customers increased by 3.9% for 2000. Sales to general service and residential customers increased 4.7% and 4.4%, respectively, while total industrial sales decreased 0.5%. In 1999, Franchised Electric's EBIT decreased $657 million compared to 1998, primarily due to the above-mentioned charge for estimated injury and damages claims. Partially offsetting this decrease was a 2.8% increase in the number of customers in Franchised Electric's service territory during 1999, and the absence of 1998 severance and other costs related to closing Franchised Electric's merchandising business. Natural Gas Transmission Years Ended December 31, -------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ------ ------ ------ (In millions, except where noted) Operating revenues........................................ $1,131 $1,230 $1,542 Operating expenses........................................ 609 615 864 ------ ------ ------ Operating income.......................................... 522 615 678 Other income, net of expenses............................. 12 12 24 ------ ------ ------ EBIT...................................................... $ 534 $ 627 $ 702 ====== ====== ====== Throughput--TBtu(a)....................................... 1,717 1,893 2,593 - -------- (a) Trillion British thermal units. In 2000, EBIT for Natural Gas Transmission decreased $93 million compared to 1999, primarily due to $132 million of EBIT in 1999 that did not reoccur in 2000. These items consisted of $70 million of EBIT related to the Midwest Pipelines, which were sold to CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) in March 1999; a $24 million gain resulting from the sale of Duke Energy's interest in the Alliance Pipeline project; and benefits totaling $38 million related to the completion of certain environmental cleanup programs below estimates. These items were partially offset by increased earnings from market-expansion projects and joint ventures such as the Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, which was placed into service in December 1999, and earnings from East Tennessee Natural Gas Company and Market Hub Partners (MHP), which were acquired in March and September 2000, respectively. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the sale of the Midwest Pipelines and the acquisitions of East Tennessee Natural Gas Company and MHP. S-14 EBIT for Natural Gas Transmission decreased $75 million in 1999 compared to 1998. As a result of the sale of the Midwest Pipelines in March 1999, EBIT for the Midwest Pipelines decreased $156 million compared to 1998's full year of operation. For the remainder of Natural Gas Transmission, EBIT increased $81 million compared to 1998, primarily as a result of increased earnings from market-expansion projects and joint ventures, higher throughput and lower operating expenses. A $24 million gain resulting from the sale of Duke Energy's interest in the Alliance Pipeline project and benefits totaling $38 million related to the completion of certain environmental cleanup programs below estimates also increased EBIT in 1999. Partially offsetting these contributions to EBIT were the favorable impacts in 1998 in connection with the resolution of regulatory issues related to natural gas supply realignment costs and a refund from a state property tax ruling. Field Services Years Ended December 31, --------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ------ ------ ------ (In millions, except where noted) Operating revenues..................................... $9,060 $3,590 $2,677 Operating expenses..................................... 8,635 3,444 2,598 ------ ------ ------ Operating income....................................... 425 146 79 Other income, net of expenses.......................... 6 (2) (3) Minority interest expense.............................. 135 -- -- ------ ------ ------ EBIT................................................... $ 296 $ 144 $ 76 ====== ====== ====== Natural gas gathered and processed/transported, TBtu/d(a)............................................. 7.6 5.1 3.6 NGL production, MBbl/d(b).............................. 358.5 192.4 110.2 Natural gas marketed, TBtu/d........................... 0.7 0.5 0.4 Average natural gas price per MMBtu(c)................. $ 3.89 $ 2.27 $ 2.11 Average NGL price per gallon(d)........................ $ 0.53 $ 0.34 $ 0.26 - -------- (a) Trillion British thermal units per day. (b) Thousand barrels per day. (c) Million British thermal units. (d) Does not reflect results of commodity hedges. Field Services' EBIT increased $152 million in 2000 from 1999. The increase in EBIT and volume activity was primarily due to the combination of Field Services' natural gas gathering, processing and marketing business with Phillips Petroleum's Gas Gathering, Processing and Marketing unit (Phillips) in March 2000; the acquisition of the natural gas gathering, processing, fractionation and NGL pipeline business from Union Pacific Resources (UPR) (collectively, the "UPR acquisition") in April 1999; and other recent acquisitions and plant expansions. For additional information on the Phillips combination and the UPR acquisition, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Improved average NGL prices, which increased 56% over 1999 prices, also contributed significantly to the increase in EBIT. In 1999, Field Services' EBIT increased $68 million compared to 1998. A significant portion of the increase resulted from earnings from the UPR acquisition. Improved average NGL prices, which were up 31% from the prior year, also contributed to the increase in EBIT. Partially offsetting these increases were $34 million of asset sale gains in 1998. S-15 North American Wholesale Energy Years Ended December 31, ---------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ------- ------- ------ (In millions, except where noted) Operating revenues...................................... $33,874 $11,801 $8,783 Operating expenses...................................... 33,386 11,591 8,619 ------- ------- ------ Operating income........................................ 488 210 164 Other income, net of expenses........................... 3 60 20 Minority interest expense............................... 73 61 51 ------- ------- ------ EBIT.................................................... $ 418 $ 209 $ 133 ======= ======= ====== Natural gas marketed, TBtu/d............................ 11.9 10.5 8.0 Electricity marketed, GWh............................... 275,258 109,634 98,991 Proportional megawatt capacity owned(a)................. 8,984 5,799 5,098 - -------- (a) Includes under construction or under contract. NAWE's EBIT increased $209 million in 2000 compared to 1999. The increase was the result of increased earnings from asset positions, increased trading margins due to price volatility in natural gas and power and a $47 million increase in income from the sale of interests in generating facilities as a result of NAWE executing its portfolio management strategy. Operating revenues and expenses increased as the volumes of natural gas and power marketed increased 13% and 151%, respectively. These increases were partially offset by a $110 million charge related to receivables for energy sales in California, and increased operating and development costs associated with business expansion. See the Current Issues, California Issues section of Management's Discussion and Analysis, and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. In 1999, EBIT for NAWE increased $76 million from 1998. The increase included $99 million in income from the sale of partial interests in four generating facilities as a result of NAWE executing its portfolio management strategy. Partially offsetting these increases were lower natural gas trading margins, partially offset by higher power trading margins as well as margins associated with other trading activities and sales of natural gas interests associated with drilling activities. Higher operating expenses and increased development costs associated with business expansion also partially offset the earnings increases. International Energy Years Ended December 31, --------------------------- 2000 1999 1998 --------- -------- -------- (In millions, except where noted) Operating revenues................................. $ 1,067 $ 357 $ 159 Operating expenses................................. 755 292 145 --------- -------- ------- Operating income................................... 312 65 14 Other income, net of expenses...................... 42 8 4 Minority interest expense.......................... 23 31 6 --------- -------- ------- EBIT............................................... $ 331 $ 42 $ 12 ========= ======== ======= Proportional megawatt capacity owned(a)............ 4,876 2,974 943 Proportional maximum pipeline capacity(a), MMcf/d(b)......................................... 416 321 124 - -------- (a) Includes under construction or under contract. (b) Million cubic feet per day. S-16 International Energy's EBIT increased $289 million in 2000 when compared to 1999. The increase was primarily attributable to increased earnings in Latin America, mainly resulting from new investments (see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of significant acquisitions). The increase also included $54 million from the February 2000 sale of certain assets relating to the transportation of liquefied natural gas. In 1999, International Energy's EBIT increased $30 million compared to 1998. Earnings from new investments in Latin America and Australia contributed $63 million to the increase. Partially offsetting these increases were higher operating expenses and increased development costs associated with business expansion. Other Energy Services Years Ended December 31, -------------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ------- ------- -------- (In millions) Operating revenues................................ $ 695 $ 989 $ 521 Operating expenses................................ 756 1,083 511 ------- ------- -------- EBIT.............................................. $ (61) $ (94) $ 10 ======= ======= ======== In 2000, EBIT for Other Energy Services improved $33 million compared to 1999. New business activity and decreased operating expenses at DukeSolutions, and earnings related to new projects at D/FD were responsible for current year improved EBIT. The results for 2000 also include Duke Energy's portion of an estimated project loss recorded by D/FD of approximately $62 million, partially offset by 1999 charges of $38 million and $35 million at DE&S and DukeSolutions, respectively. The 1999 charges primarily related to expenses for severance and office closings associated with repositioning the companies for growth. EBIT for Other Energy Services decreased $104 million in 1999 compared to 1998. The decrease was primarily due to the above-mentioned charges of $38 million and $35 million at DE&S and DukeSolutions, respectively. Increased development costs at DukeSolutions and decreased earnings from projects of DE&S also contributed to lower EBIT. Duke Ventures Years Ended December 31, -------------------------- 2000 1999 1998 -------- -------- -------- (In millions) Operating revenues................................ $ 642 $ 232 $ 171 Operating expenses................................ 79 70 49 ------- -------- -------- EBIT.............................................. $ 563 $ 162 $ 122 ======= ======== ======== EBIT for Duke Ventures increased $401 million in 2000 when compared to 1999. This increase is primarily attributable to the sale by DukeNet of its 20% interest in BellSouth PCS to BellSouth Corporation for a pre-tax gain of $407 million. Slightly offsetting this increase in EBIT was a decrease in commercial project sales and land sales at Crescent. In 1999, EBIT for Duke Ventures increased $40 million compared to 1998. The increase was primarily due to Crescent's increased residential developed lot sales, land sales and commercial project sales, partially offset by decreased lake lot sales. Increased fiber optic revenues at DukeNet and decreased losses related to its interest in BellSouth PCS also contributed to increased EBIT. S-17 Other Impacts on Earnings Available for Common Stockholders Interest expense increased $310 million in 2000 compared to 1999, and $87 million in 1999 compared to 1998 due to higher average debt balances outstanding, resulting from acquisitions and expansion. Minority interest expense increased $165 million in 2000 compared to 1999 and $46 million in 1999 compared to 1998. Included in minority interest expense is expense related to regular distributions on issuances of Duke Energy's trust preferred securities (see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). This expense increased $21 million for 2000 and $43 million for 1999 due to additional issuances of Duke Energy's trust preferred securities during 1999 and 1998. In addition, the increase for 2000 includes minority interest expense related to Field Services' combination with Phillips Petroleum, and increased minority interest expense at NAWE related to its joint venture with Exxon Mobil Corporation, partially offset by decreased minority interest expense at International Energy related to its 1999 and 2000 acquisitions. The 1999 increase in minority interest expense over 1998 related primarily to International Energy's 1999 investments and NAWE's joint venture with Exxon Mobil Corporation. For additional information regarding acquisitions and new joint venture projects, see Notes 2 and 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Duke Energy's effective income tax rate was approximately 37%, 35% and 38% for 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The decrease in 1999 was primarily due to the favorable resolution of several income tax issues and the utilization of certain capital loss carryforwards due to the sale of the Midwest Pipelines. The sale of the Midwest Pipelines to CMS closed in March 1999 and resulted in a $660 million extraordinary gain, net of income tax of $404 million (see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). In January 1998, TEPPCO Partners, LP, in which Duke Energy has a 21.1% ownership interest, redeemed certain First Mortgage Notes. This resulted in a non-cash extraordinary loss of $8 million, net of income tax of $5 million, related to Duke Energy's share of costs of the early retirement of debt. Liquidity and Capital Resources Operating Cash Flows Net cash provided by operations was $2,225 million in 2000, $2,684 million in 1999 and $2,331 million in 1998. Cash flows from operations decreased in 2000 compared to 1999 primarily due to tax payments made in 2000 related to the sale of the Midwest Pipelines. The increase in cash flows from operations in 1999 from 1998 was primarily due to net income resulting from business expansion. In 1999, Duke Energy established an accrual for estimated injury and damages claims. During 2000, Duke Energy paid approximately $253 million for the related insurance premium. Management believes that the long-term cash requirements of the projected liability will not have a material effect on Duke Energy's liquidity or cash flows. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion. Investing Cash Flows Capital and investment expenditures were approximately $5.6 billion in 2000 compared to $5.9 billion in 1999. The primary use of cash in investing activities for capital and investment expenditures reflects development and expansion expenditures, upgrades to existing assets and the acquisitions of various businesses and assets. The change in Natural Gas Transmission's capital expenditures is primarily due to business expansion related to the approximately $390 million acquisition of East Tennessee Natural Gas Company and the approximately $250 million of cash for the acquisition of MHP. In 2000, NAWE began construction of a number of power generation plants in the U.S. and continued capital expenditures on projects initiated prior to 2000. International Energy's business expansion included the completion of a tender offer to the minority S-18 shareholders of Companhia de Geracao de Energia Eletrica Paranapanema (Paranapanema) for approximately $280 million and the completion of the approximately $405 million acquisition of Dominion Resources, Inc.'s portfolio of hydroelectric, natural gas and diesel power generation businesses in Latin America. Offsetting the capital and investing expenditures were cash proceeds of $400 million from the 2000 sale of Duke Energy's 20% interest in BellSouth PCS to BellSouth Corporation. For additional information concerning significant acquisitions and dispositions, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Capital and Investment Expenditures by Business Segment Years Ended December 31, -------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ------ ------ ------ (in millions) Franchised Electric....................................... $ 661 $ 759 $ 586 Natural Gas Transmission.................................. 973 261 290 Field Services............................................ 376 1,630 304 North American Wholesale Energy........................... 1,937 1,028 796 International Energy...................................... 980 1,779 239 Other Energy Services..................................... 28 94 41 Duke Ventures............................................. 643 382 232 Other Operations.......................................... 36 3 12 ------ ------ ------ Total consolidated...................................... $5,634 $5,936 $2,500 ====== ====== ====== Capital and investment expenditures in 1999 increased approximately $3.4 billion from 1998 capital and investment expenditures of approximately $2.5 billion. The increase primarily resulted from business expansion for the Field Services, NAWE and International Energy business segments. Business expansion for Field Services included the $1.35 billion UPR acquisition. In 1999, NAWE began construction of multiple power generation plants in the U.S. and continued capital expenditures on projects initiated prior to 1999. International Energy's business expansion included $1.7 billion for multiple acquisitions in Latin America, western Australia and New Zealand. Expenditures related to these activities were partially funded by $1.9 billion in cash proceeds from the sale of the Midwest Pipelines. For additional information concerning significant acquisitions and dispositions, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Projected 2001 capital and investment expenditures for Duke Energy are approximately $7.9 billion, of which over 75% is planned to be for competitive business segments which are not subject to state rate regulation. This projection includes approximately $6.5 billion for acquisitions and other expansion opportunities and $1.4 billion for existing plant upgrades. Duke Energy's projected capital expenditures also include $800 million in expenditures over the next three years for its Gulfstream pipeline project. All projected capital and investment expenditures are subject to periodic review and revision and may vary significantly depending on a number of factors including, but not limited to, industry restructuring, regulatory constraints, acquisition opportunities, market volatility and economic trends. Financing Cash Flows Duke Energy's consolidated capital structure at December 31, 2000, including short-term debt, was 48% debt, 46% common equity and minority interests, 5% trust preferred securities and 1% preferred stock. Fixed charges coverage, calculated using the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) method, was 3.8 times, 2.9 times and 4.7 times for 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Duke Energy's business expansion opportunities, along with dividends, debt repayments and operating requirements, are expected to be funded by cash from operations, external financing, common stock issuances and the proceeds from certain asset sales. Funding requirements met by external financing, common stock S-19 issuances and proceeds from the sale of assets are dependent upon the opportunities presented and favorable market conditions. Management believes Duke Energy has adequate financial resources to meet its future needs. During 2000, Duke Energy issued a total of $550 million of Senior Notes at rates of approximately 7.250%. The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes. In April 2000, DEFS issued approximately $2.75 billion of commercial paper associated with the Phillips combination of which $1.22 billion was distributed to Phillips Petroleum. In August 2000, DEFS issued $1.7 billion of notes at rates from 7.50% to 8.125% and reduced the outstanding balance of its commercial paper. In December 2000, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation (TETCO) issued $300 million of 7.30% notes due 2010. For additional information regarding debt, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. During 2000, Duke Energy formed Catawba River Associates, LLC, and third- party, non-controlling, preferred interest holders invested approximately $1,025 million. The preferred interest receives a preferred return equal to an adjusted floating reference rate (approximately 7.847% at December 31, 2000). See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion. During 2000, Duke Energy repaid $380 million of 8.0% notes, $200 million of 7.0% notes, $200 million of 10.375% notes and made $323 million in scheduled debt repayments. In addition, Duke Energy made a tender offer for $115 million of the notes assumed with the acquisition of MHP. As of December 31, 2000, approximately $88 million of these notes had been retired. Under its commercial paper facilities and extendible commercial note programs (ECNs), Duke Energy had the ability to borrow up to $5.7 billion and $3.3 billion at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. A summary of the available commercial paper and ECNs as of December 31, 2000, is as follows: Duke Energy Duke Duke Capital Field Duke Energy Energy Corporation(a) Services International Total ------ -------------- ----------- ------------- ----- (in billions) Commercial paper......... $1.25 $1.55 $1.00(b) $0.41(c) $4.21 ECNs..................... 0.50 1.00 -- -- 1.50 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Total.................. $1.75 $2.55 $1.00 $0.41 $5.71 ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== - -------- (a) Duke Capital Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of Duke Energy that provides financing and credit enhancement services for its subsidiaries. (b) Original availability of $2.8 billion was reduced to $1.0 billion upon DEFS' issuance of $1.7 billion in notes in August 2000. (c) Includes ability to issue medium-term notes. The amount of Duke Energy's bank credit and construction facilities available at December 31, 2000 and 1999, was approximately $4.2 billion and $3.7 billion, respectively. Certain of the bank credit facilities support the issuance of commercial paper; therefore, the issuance of commercial paper reduces the amount available under these credit facilities. At December 31, 2000, approximately $3.2 billion was outstanding under the commercial paper facilities and ECNs, and approximately $44 million was outstanding under bank credit and construction facilities. As of December 31, 2000, Duke Energy and its subsidiaries had the ability to issue up to $4.5 billion aggregate public offering price of debt and other securities under shelf registrations filed with the SEC. Such securities may be issued as Senior Notes, First and Refunding Mortgage Bonds, Subordinated Notes, Trust Preferred Securities, Duke Energy Common Stock, Stock Purchase Contracts or Stock Purchase Units. On December 20, 2000, Duke Energy announced a two-for-one common stock split effective January 26, 2001, to shareholders of record on January 3, 2001. All outstanding share and per-share amounts have been restated to reflect the stock split. S-20 To maintain financial flexibility and reduce the amount of financing needed for growth opportunities, Duke Energy's Board of Directors adopted a dividend policy in December 2000 that maintains dividends at the current quarterly rate of $0.275 per share, subject to declarations from time to time by the Board of Directors. This policy is consistent with Duke Energy's growth profile and strikes a balance between providing a competitive dividend yield and ensuring that cash is available to fund Duke Energy's growth. Duke Energy has paid quarterly cash dividends for 74 consecutive years. Dividends on common and preferred stocks in 2001 are expected to be paid on March 16, June 18, September 17 and December 17, subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors. Duke Energy's InvestorDirect Choice Plan, a stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plan, allows investors to reinvest dividends in new issuances of common stock and to purchase common stock directly from Duke Energy. Issuances under this plan were not material in 2000, 1999 or 1998. Duke Energy used authorized but unissued shares of its common stock to meet 2000 and 1999 employee benefit plan contribution requirements. This practice is expected to continue in 2001. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Risk Policies Duke Energy is exposed to market risks associated with interest rates, commodity prices, equity prices and foreign currency exchange rates. Comprehensive risk management policies have been established by management to monitor and manage these market risks. Duke Energy's Policy Committee is responsible for the overall approval of market risk management policies and the delegation of approval and authorization levels. The Policy Committee is comprised of senior executives who receive periodic updates from the Chief Risk Officer (CRO) on market risk positions, corporate exposures, credit exposures and overall results of Duke Energy's risk management activities. The CRO has responsibility for the overall management of interest rate risk, foreign currency risk, credit risk and energy risk, including monitoring of exposure limits. Interest Rate Risk Duke Energy is exposed to risk resulting from changes in interest rates as a result of its issuance of variable-rate debt, fixed-rate securities, commercial paper and auction market preferred stock, as well as interest rate swaps and interest rate lock agreements. Duke Energy manages its interest rate exposure by limiting its variable-rate and fixed-rate exposures to certain percentages of total capitalization, as set by policy, and by monitoring the effects of market changes in interest rates. Duke Energy may also enter into financial derivative instruments, including, but not limited to, swaps, options and treasury lock agreements to manage and mitigate interest rate risk exposure. See Notes 1, 7, 10, 12 and 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Based on a sensitivity analysis as of December 31, 2000, it was estimated that if market interest rates average 1% higher (lower) in 2001 than in 2000, earnings before income taxes would decrease (increase) by approximately $53 million. Comparatively, based on a sensitivity analysis as of December 31, 1999, had interest rates averaged 1% higher (lower) in 2000 than in 1999, it was estimated that earnings before income taxes would have decreased (increased) by approximately $24 million. These amounts were determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on the variable-rate securities outstanding as of December 31, 2000 and 1999. The increase in interest rate sensitivity is primarily the result of the increase in outstanding variable-rate commercial paper. In the event of a significant change in interest rates, management would likely take actions to manage its exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no changes in Duke Energy's financial structure. S-21 Commodity Price Risk Duke Energy, substantially through its subsidiaries, is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in the price of natural gas, electricity and other energy-related products marketed and purchased. Duke Energy employs established policies and procedures to manage its risks associated with these market fluctuations using various commodity derivatives, including forward contracts, futures, swaps and options. See Notes 1 and 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. The risk in the commodity trading portfolio is measured and monitored on a daily basis utilizing a Value-at-Risk model to determine the maximum potential one-day favorable or unfavorable Daily Earnings at Risk (DER). The DER is monitored daily in comparison to established thresholds. Other measures are also utilized to limit and monitor the risk in the commodity trading portfolio on monthly and annual bases. The DER computations are based on a historical simulation, which utilizes price movements over a specified period to simulate forward price curves in the energy markets to estimate the favorable or unfavorable impact of one day's price movement on the existing portfolio. The historical simulation emphasizes the most recent market activity, which is considered the most relevant predictor of immediate future market movements for natural gas, electricity and other energy-related products. The DER computations utilize several key assumptions, including a 95% confidence level for the resultant price movement and the holding period specified for the calculation. Duke Energy's DER calculation includes commodity derivative instruments held for trading purposes. Duke Energy's DER amounts are depicted in the table below. The increase in DER amounts as compared to 1999 is a result of Duke Energy's expanding portfolio of energy-related products both domestically and internationally. Daily Earnings at Risk Estimated One-Day Estimated One-Day Estimated Average Estimated Average Operational Impact on EBIT at Impact on EBIT at One-Day Impact on One-Day Impact on Locations December 31, 2000 December 31, 1999 EBIT for 2000 EBIT for 1999 ----------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- (in millions) (a) North American.. $20 $10 $16 $11 Other international.. 11 -- 2 -- - -------- (a) Changes in markets inconsistent with historical trends could cause actual results to exceed predicted limits. Certain subsidiaries of Duke Energy are also exposed to market fluctuations in the prices of various commodities related to their ongoing power generating, natural gas gathering, processing and marketing activities. Duke Energy closely monitors the risks associated with these commodities' price changes on its future operations, and where appropriate, uses various commodity instruments, such as electricity, natural gas, crude oil and NGLs to hedge these price risks. Based on a sensitivity analysis as of December 31, 2000, it was estimated that if NGL prices average one cent per gallon less in 2001, EBIT would decrease by approximately $8 million, after considering the effect of Duke Energy's commodity hedge positions. Comparatively, the same sensitivity analysis as of December 31, 1999, estimated that EBIT would have decreased by approximately $6 million. Based on the sensitivity analyses associated with other commodities' price changes, net of Duke Energy's commodity hedge positions, the effect on EBIT was not material as of December 31, 2000 or 1999. Credit Risk Duke Energy's principal markets for power and natural gas marketing services are industrial end-users and utilities located throughout the U.S., Canada, Asia Pacific and Latin America. Duke Energy has concentrations of receivables from natural gas and electric utilities and their affiliates, as well as industrial customers throughout these regions. These concentrations of customers may affect Duke Energy's overall credit risk in that certain customers may be similarly affected by changes in economic, regulatory or other factors. On all transactions where Duke Energy is exposed to credit risk, Duke Energy analyzes the counterparties' financial S-22 condition prior to entering into an agreement, establishes credit limits and monitors the appropriateness of these limits on an ongoing basis. As of December 31, 2000, Duke Energy had approximately $400 million in receivables related to energy sales in California. Duke Energy quantified its exposures with regard to those receivables and recorded a provision of $110 million. See the Current Issues, California Issues section of Management's Discussion and Analysis, and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding credit exposure. The change in market value of New York Mercantile Exchange-traded futures and options contracts requires daily cash settlement in margin accounts with brokers. Physical forward contracts and financial derivatives are generally settled at the expiration of the contract term or each delivery period; however, these transactions are also generally subject to margin agreements with the majority of Duke Energy's counterparties. Equity Price Risk Duke Energy maintains trust funds, as required by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, to fund certain costs of nuclear decommissioning (see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, these funds were invested primarily in domestic and international equity securities, fixed-rate, fixed-income securities and cash and cash equivalents. Management believes that its exposure to fluctuations in equity prices or interest rates will not materially affect consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. See further discussion in the Current Issues, Nuclear Decommissioning Costs section of Management's Discussion and Analysis. Foreign Currency Risk Duke Energy is exposed to foreign currency risk that arises from investments in international affiliates and businesses owned and operated in foreign countries. To mitigate risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations, when possible, contracts are denominated in or indexed to the U.S. dollar, or investments may be hedged through debt denominated in the foreign currency. Duke Energy also uses foreign currency derivatives, where possible, to manage its risk related to foreign currency fluctuations. To monitor its currency exchange rate risks, Duke Energy uses sensitivity analysis, which measures the impact of a devaluation of the foreign currencies to which it has exposure. At December 31, 2000, Duke Energy's primary foreign currency exchange rate exposures were the Brazilian real, the Peruvian nuevo sol, the Australian dollar, the El Salvadoran colon, the Argentine peso, the European euro and the Canadian dollar. Based on a sensitivity analysis as of December 31, 2000, a 10% devaluation in the currency exchange rates in Brazil would reduce Duke Energy's financial position by approximately $91 million and would not significantly affect Duke Energy's consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position over the next 12 months. Based on a sensitivity analysis as of December 31, 1999, a 10% devaluation in the Brazilian currency exchange rates would have reduced Duke Energy's financial position by approximately $65 million. The increase in sensitivity to the Brazilian real is primarily due to the increased investment in Paranapanema as a result of Duke Energy's tender offer in 2000. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. Based on these sensitivity analyses, a 10% devaluation in other foreign currencies was insignificant to Duke Energy's consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Current Issues Electric Competition. Wholesale Competition. The Energy Policy Act of 1992 and the FERC's subsequent rulemaking activities opened the wholesale energy market to competition. Open-access transmission for wholesale customers as defined by the FERC's final rules provides energy suppliers, including Duke Energy, with opportunities to sell and deliver capacity and energy at market-based prices. Franchised Electric obtained from the FERC's open-access rule the rights to sell capacity and energy at S-23 market-based rates from its own assets, which allows Franchised Electric to purchase, at attractive rates, a portion of its capacity and energy requirements resulting in lower overall costs to customers. Open access also provides Franchised Electric's existing wholesale customers with competitive opportunities to seek other suppliers for their capacity and energy requirements. On December 20, 1999 and February 25, 2000, the FERC issued its Order 2000 and Order 2000-A regarding Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs). In these orders, the FERC stressed the voluntary nature of RTO participation by utilities and set minimum characteristics and functions that must be met by utilities that participate in an RTO, including exclusive and independent authority to propose rates, terms and conditions of transmission service provided over the facilities it operates. The order provides for an open, flexible structure for RTOs to meet the needs of the market and provides for the possibility of incentive ratemaking and other benefits for utilities that participate in an RTO. As a result of these rulemakings, on October 16, 2000, Duke Energy and two other investor-owned utilities, Progress Energy and South Carolina Electric & Gas, filed with the FERC to establish GridSouth Transco, LLC (GridSouth), as an RTO. If approved, GridSouth will be a for-profit, independent transmission company, responsible for operating and planning the companies' combined transmission systems. The target date for formation of GridSouth is December 15, 2001. However, the actual date that GridSouth becomes operational will depend upon the resolution of all necessary regulatory approvals and resolving all technical issues. Management believes that the establishment of GridSouth will not have a material adverse effect on Duke Energy's future consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Retail Competition. Currently, Franchised Electric operates as a vertically integrated, investor-owned utility with exclusive rights to supply electricity in a franchised service territory--a 22,000-square-mile service territory in the Carolinas. In its retail business, the NCUC and the PSCSC regulate Franchised Electric's service and rates. Electric industry restructuring is being addressed in all 50 states and in the District of Columbia. These restructurings will likely impact all entities owning electric generating assets. The NCUC and the PSCSC are studying the merits of restructuring the electric utility industry in the Carolinas. During 1999, three electric utility restructuring bills were filed in South Carolina's House of Representatives. All three bills addressed competition while allowing utilities to recover stranded costs, and have transition and phase-in periods ranging from five to six years. A task force formed by the South Carolina Senate is also examining issues related to deregulation of the state's electric utility business. Legislators anticipate that legislation is likely to be introduced during 2001. This task force will prepare a report for review, discussion and possible legislative action by the state's Senate Judiciary Committee and General Assembly as a whole. In May 1997, North Carolina passed a bill that established a study commission to examine whether competition should be implemented in the state. Members of this commission include legislators, customers, utilities and a member of an environmental group. The study commission unanimously approved a set of recommendations on electric restructuring in April 2000. The commission's report to the legislature containing these recommendations was submitted to the General Assembly in May. The report basically recommended retail deregulation beginning partially in 2005 and fully in 2006. However, recent events in California's power market have led the study commission to evaluate whether, and to what extent, proposed legislation should be introduced in 2001. In general, the commission has expressed interest in ensuring that a viable wholesale electric market is in place prior to opening the state's retail electric market. Currently, the electric utility industry is predominantly regulated on a basis designed to recover the cost of providing electric power to customers. If cost-based regulation were to be discontinued in the industry for any reason, including competitive pressure on the cost-based prices of electricity, profits could be reduced and electric utilities might be required to reduce their asset balances to reflect a market basis less than cost. Discontinuance of cost-based regulation would also require affected utilities to write off their associated regulatory assets. Duke Energy's regulatory assets are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The portion S-24 of these regulatory assets related to Franchised Electric is approximately $1.2 billion, including primarily purchased capacity costs, deferred debt expense and deferred taxes related to regulatory assets. Duke Energy is recovering substantially all of these regulatory assets through its current wholesale and retail electric rates and may attempt to continue to recover these assets during a transition to competition. In addition, Duke Energy would seek to recover the costs of its electric generating facilities in excess of the market price of power at the time of transition. Duke Energy supports a properly managed and orderly transition to competitive generation and retail services in the electric industry. However, transforming the current regulated industry into efficient, competitive generation and retail electric markets is a complex undertaking, which will require a carefully considered transition to a restructured electric industry. The key to effective retail competition is fairness among customers, service providers and investors. Duke Energy intends to continue to work with customers, legislators and regulators to address all the important issues. Management currently cannot predict the impact, if any, of these competitive forces on future consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Natural Gas Competition. Wholesale Competition. On February 9, 2000, the FERC issued Order 637, which sets forth revisions to its regulations governing short-term natural gas transportation services and policies governing the regulation of interstate natural gas pipelines. "Short-term" has been defined as all transactions of less than one year. Among the significant actions taken are the lifting of the price cap for short-term capacity release by pipeline customers for an experimental 2 1/2-year period ending September 1, 2002, and requiring that interstate pipelines file pro forma tariff sheets to (i) provide for nomination equality between capacity release and primary pipeline capacity; (ii) implement imbalance management services (for which interstate pipelines may charge fees) while at the same time reducing the use of operational flow orders and penalties; and (iii) provide segmentation rights if operationally feasible. Order 637 also narrows the right of first refusal to remove economic biases perceived in the current rule. Order 637 imposes significant new reporting requirements for interstate pipelines that were implemented by Duke Energy during the third quarter of 2000. Additionally, Order 637 permits pipelines to propose peak/off-peak rates and term-differentiated rates, and encourages pipelines to propose experimental capacity auctions. By Order 637-A, issued in February 2000, the FERC generally denied requests for rehearing and several parties, including Duke Energy, have filed appeals in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals seeking court review of various aspects of the Order. During the third quarter of 2000, Duke Energy's interstate pipelines made the required pro forma tariff sheet filings. These filings are currently subject to review and approval by the FERC. Management does not believe the effects of these matters will have a material effect on Duke Energy's future consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Retail Competition. Changes in regulation to allow retail competition could affect Duke Energy's natural gas transportation contracts with local natural gas distribution companies. Natural gas retail deregulation is in the very early stages of development and management cannot estimate the effects of this matter on future consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Nuclear Decommissioning Costs. Estimated site-specific nuclear decommissioning costs, including the cost of decommissioning plant components not subject to radioactive contamination, total approximately $1.9 billion stated in 1999 dollars based on decommissioning studies completed in 1999. Duke Energy contributes to an external decommissioning trust fund and maintains an internal reserve to fund these costs. The balance of the external fund as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, was $717 million and $703 million, respectively. The balance of the internal reserve as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, was $231 million and $223 million, respectively, and is reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization. Both the NCUC and the PSCSC have granted Duke Energy recovery of estimated decommissioning costs through retail rates over the expected remaining service periods of its nuclear plants. Management believes that S-25 funding of the decommissioning costs will not have a material adverse effect on consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. The external decommissioning trust fund is invested primarily in domestic and international equity securities, fixed-rate, fixed-income securities and cash and cash equivalents. These investments are exposed to price fluctuations in equity markets, and changes in interest rates. Because the accounting for nuclear decommissioning recognizes that costs are recovered through Franchised Electric's rates, fluctuations in equity prices or interest rates do not affect consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Nuclear Re-licensing. In May 2000, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission renewed the operating license for Duke Energy's three Oconee nuclear units through 2033 to 2034. Licenses for Duke Energy's other nuclear units expire between 2021 and 2026 and are also available for renewal. Environmental. Duke Energy is subject to international, federal, state and local regulations regarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal and other environmental matters. Manufactured Gas Plants and Superfund Sites. Duke Energy was an operator of manufactured gas plants until the early 1950s and has entered into a cooperative effort with the State of North Carolina and other owners of certain former manufactured gas plant sites to investigate and, where necessary, remediate these contaminated sites. Duke Energy is considered by regulators to be a potentially responsible party and may be subject to future liability at eight federal Superfund sites and three state Superfund sites. While the cost of remediation of these sites may be substantial, Duke Energy will share in any liability associated with remediation of contamination at such sites with other potentially responsible parties. Management believes that resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. PCB (Polychlorinated Biphenyl) Assessment and Cleanup Programs. In June 1999, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) certified that TETCO, a wholly owned subsidiary of Duke Energy, had completed cleanup of PCB-contaminated sites under conditions stipulated by a U.S. Consent Decree in 1989. TETCO was required to continue groundwater monitoring on a number of sites for two years. This required monitoring was completed as of the end of 2000, pending EPA concurrence. TETCO will be evaluating and discussing with the EPA, appropriate state authorities or both the need for additional remediation or monitoring. Under terms of the sales agreement with CMS discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Duke Energy is obligated to complete cleanup of previously identified contamination resulting from the past use of PCB- containing lubricants and other discontinued practices at certain sites on the PEPL and Trunkline systems. Based on Duke Energy's experience to date and costs incurred for cleanup operations, management believes the resolution of matters relating to the environmental issues discussed above will not have a material adverse effect on consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Air Quality Control. The Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1990 required a two-phase reduction by electric utilities in aggregate annual emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide by 2000. All projects associated with these requirements have been completed and Duke Energy currently meets all requirements of Phase I and Phase II. In October 1998, the EPA issued a final rule on regional ozone control that required 22 eastern states and the District of Columbia to revise their State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to significantly reduce emissions of nitrogen oxide by May 1, 2003. The EPA's rule was challenged in court by various states, industry and other interests, including the states of North Carolina and South Carolina, and Duke Energy. In March 2000, the court upheld most aspects of the EPA's rule. The same court subsequently issued a decision that extended the compliance deadline for implementation of emission reductions to May 31, 2004. In January 2000, the EPA S-26 finalized another ozone-related rule under Section 126 of the CAA that has virtually identical emission control requirements as its October 1998 action, but with a May 1, 2003 compliance date. The EPA's 2000 rule has been challenged in court. The court is expected to issue its decision during the spring of 2001. In response to the EPA's October 1998 rule, both North Carolina and South Carolina are in the process of finalizing the SIP revisions to implement the EPA rule's emission reduction requirements. Additionally, North Carolina has adopted a separate rule that caps nitrogen oxide emissions from coal-fired power plants in the event the EPA's SIP rule is eventually overturned. Depending on the resolution of these and related matters, management anticipates that costs to Duke Energy may range from $500 million to $900 million in capital costs for additional emission controls over an estimated time period which continues through 2007. Emission control retrofits of this type are large technical, design and construction projects. These projects will be managed closely to ensure the continuation of reliable electric service to Duke Energy's customers throughout the projects and upon their completion. On December 22, 2000, the U.S. Justice Department, acting on behalf of the EPA, filed a complaint against Duke Energy in the U.S. District Court in Greensboro, North Carolina, for alleged violations of the New Source Review (NSR) provisions of the CAA. The EPA is claiming that 29 projects performed at 25 of Duke Energy's coal-fired units were major modifications as defined in the CAA and that Duke Energy violated the CAA's NSR requirements when it undertook those projects without obtaining permits and installing emission controls for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and particulate matter. The complaint requests, among other things, that the court enjoin Duke Energy from operating the coal- fired units identified in the complaint, and order Duke Energy to install additional emission controls and pay unspecified civil penalties. This complaint appears to be part of the EPA's NSR enforcement initiative, in which the EPA claims that utilities and others have committed widespread violations of the CAA permitting requirements for the past 25 years. The EPA has sued or issued notices of violation of investigative information requests, to at least 48 other electric utilities and cooperatives. The EPA's allegations run counter to previous EPA guidance regarding the applicability of the NSR permitting requirements. Duke Energy, along with other utilities, has routinely undertaken the type of repair, replacement, and maintenance projects that the EPA now claims are illegal. Duke Energy believes that all of its electric generation units are properly permitted and have been properly maintained, and intends to defend itself vigorously against these alleged violations. However, because these matters are in a preliminary stage, management cannot estimate the effects of these matters on Duke Energy's future consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. The CAA authorizes civil penalties of up to $27,500 per day per violation at each generating unit. Civil penalties, if ultimately imposed by the court, and the cost of any required new pollution control equipment, if the court accepts the EPA's contentions, could be substantial. Global Climate Change. In 1997, the United Nations held negotiations in Kyoto, Japan to determine how to minimize global warming. The resulting Kyoto Protocol prescribed, among other greenhouse gas emission reduction tactics, carbon dioxide emission reductions from fossil-fueled electric generating facilities in the U.S. and other developed nations, as well as methane emission reductions from natural gas operations. Several subsequent meetings have been held attempting to resolve operational details to clear the way for multinational ratification and implementation without resolution. If the Kyoto Protocol were to be adopted in its current form, it could have far-reaching implications for Duke Energy and the entire energy industry. However, the outcome and timing of these implications are highly uncertain, and Duke Energy cannot estimate the effects on future consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Duke Energy remains engaged with those developing public policy initiatives and continuously assesses the commercial implications for its markets around the world. California Issues. California Litigation. Duke Energy's subsidiaries, DENA and DETM, have been named among 16 defendants in a class action lawsuit (the Gordon lawsuit) filed against companies identified as "generators and traders" of electricity in California markets. DETM also was named as one of numerous S-27 defendants in four additional lawsuits, including two class actions (the Hendricks and Pier 23 Restaurant lawsuits), filed against generators, marketers and traders and other unnamed providers of electricity in California markets. These suits were brought either by or on behalf of electricity consumers in the State of California. The Gordon and Hendricks class action suits were filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, San Diego County, in November 2000. The other three suits were filed in January 2001, one in the Superior Court of the State of California, San Diego County, and the other two in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco. These suits generally allege that the defendants manipulated the wholesale electricity markets in violation of state laws against unfair and unlawful business practices and state antitrust laws. Plaintiffs in the Gordon suit seek aggregate damages of over $4 billion, and the plaintiffs in the other suits, to the extent damages are specified, allege damages in excess of $1 billion. The lawsuits each seek the disgorgement of alleged unlawfully obtained revenues for sales of electricity and, in three suits, an award of treble damages. California Wholesale Electricity Markets. As a result of high prices in the western U.S. wholesale electricity markets in 2000, several state and federal regulatory investigations and complaints have commenced to determine the causes of the prices and potentially to recommend remedial action. The FERC concluded its investigation by issuing on December 15, 2000, an Order Directing Remedies in California Wholesale Electricity Markets. In this conclusion, the FERC found no basis in allegations made by government officials in California that specific electric generators artificially drove up power prices. This conclusion is consistent with similar findings by the Compliance Unit of the California Power Exchange (CalPX) and the Northwest Power Planning Council. That Order is the subject of numerous rehearing requests. At the state level, the California Public Utilities Commission, the California Electricity Oversight Board, the California Bureau of State Audits and the California Office of the Attorney General all have separate ongoing investigations into the high prices and their causes. None of those investigations have been completed and no findings have been made in connection with any of them. California Utilities Defaults and Other Proceedings. Two California electric utilities recently defaulted on many of their obligations to suppliers and creditors. NAWE supplies electric power to these utilities directly and indirectly through contracts through the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) and the CalPX. NAWE also supplies natural gas to these utilities under direct contracts. With respect to electric power sales through the CAISO and CalPX, Duke Energy quantified its exposures at December 31, 2000 to these utilities and recorded a $110 million provision. As a result of these defaults and certain related government actions, Duke Energy has taken a number of steps, including initiating court actions, to mitigate its exposure. While these matters referenced above are in their earliest stages, management does not believe, based on its analysis to date of the factual background and the claims asserted in these matters, that their resolution will have a material adverse effect on Duke Energy's consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Litigation and Contingencies. Exxon Mobil Corporation Arbitration. In December 2000, three subsidiaries of Duke Energy initiated binding arbitration against three subsidiaries of the Exxon Mobil Corporation (collectively, the "Exxon Mobil entities") concerning the parties' joint ownership of DETM and certain related affiliates (collectively, the "Ventures"). At issue is a buy- out right provision in the parties' agreement. The agreements governing the ownership of the Ventures contain provisions giving Duke Energy the right to purchase the Exxon Mobil entities' 40% interest in the Ventures in the event material business disputes arise between the Ventures' owners. Such disputes have arisen, and consequently, Duke Energy exercised its right to buy the Exxon Mobil entities' interest. Duke Energy claims that refusal by the Exxon Mobil entities to honor the exercise is a breach of the buy-out right provision, and seeks specific performance of the provision. Duke Energy also complains of the Exxon Mobil entities' lack of use of, and contributions to, the Ventures. S-28 In January 2001, the Exxon Mobil entities asserted counterclaims in the arbitration and claims in a separate Texas state court action alleging that Duke Energy breached its obligations to the Ventures and to the Exxon Mobil entities. The Exxon Mobil entities also claim that Duke Energy violated a Guaranty Agreement. While this matter is in its early stages, management believes that the final disposition of this action will not have a material adverse effect on Duke Energy's consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. For information concerning litigation and other commitments and contingencies, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. New Accounting Standard. In June 1998, Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," was issued. Duke Energy was required to adopt this standard by January 1, 2001. SFAS No. 133 requires that all derivatives be recognized as either assets or liabilities and measured at fair value, and changes in the fair value of derivatives are reported in current earnings, unless the derivative is designated and effective as a hedge. If the intended use of the derivative is to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, a liability or a firm commitment, then changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument will generally be offset in the income statement by changes in the hedged item's fair value. However, if the intended use of the derivative is to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, then changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument will generally be reported in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI). The gains and losses on the derivative instrument that are reported in OCI will be reclassified to earnings in the periods in which earnings are impacted by the hedged item. Duke Energy has determined the effect of implementing SFAS No. 133 and recorded a net-of-tax cumulative-effect adjustment of $96 million as a reduction in earnings. The net-of-tax cumulative-effect adjustment reducing OCI and Common Stockholders' Equity is estimated to be $921 million on January 1, 2001. Currently, there are ongoing discussions surrounding the implementation and interpretation of SFAS No. 133 by the Financial Accounting Standards Board's Derivatives Implementation Group. Duke Energy implemented SFAS No. 133 based on current rules and guidance in place as of January 1, 2001. However, if the definition of derivative instruments is altered, this may impact Duke Energy's transition adjustment amounts and subsequent reported operating results. Forward-Looking Statements. From time to time, Duke Energy's reports, filings and other public announcements may include assumptions, projections, expectations, intentions or beliefs about future events. These statements are intended as "forward-looking statements" under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Duke Energy cautions that assumptions, projections, expectations, intentions or beliefs about future events may and often do vary from actual results and the differences between assumptions, projections, expectations, intentions or beliefs and actual results can be material. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that could cause actual achievements and events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements include state, federal and foreign legislative and regulatory initiatives that affect cost and investment recovery, have an impact on rate structures and affect the speed and degree at which competition enters the electric and natural gas industries; industrial, commercial and residential growth in the service territories of Duke Energy and its subsidiaries; the weather and other natural phenomena; the timing and extent of changes in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates; changes in environmental and other laws and regulations to which Duke Energy and its subsidiaries are subject or other external factors over which Duke Energy has no control; the results of financing efforts, including Duke Energy's ability to obtain financing on favorable terms, which can be affected by Duke Energy's credit rating and general economic conditions; growth in opportunities for Duke Energy's business units; and the effect of accounting policies issued periodically by accounting standard-setting bodies. S-29 Selected Financial Data 2000(a) 1999(b) 1998 1997(c) 1996(c) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- (in millions, except per share amounts) Income Statement Operating revenues.................. $49,318 $21,766 $17,662 $16,309 $12,302 Operating expenses.................. 45,505 19,947 15,177 14,339 10,143 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Operating income.................... 3,813 1,819 2,485 1,970 2,159 Other income and expenses........... 201 224 162 138 135 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Earnings before interest and taxes.. 4,014 2,043 2,647 2,108 2,294 Interest expense.................... 911 601 514 472 499 Minority interest expense........... 307 142 96 23 6 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Earnings before income taxes........ 2,796 1,300 2,037 1,613 1,789 Income taxes........................ 1,020 453 777 639 698 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Income before extraordinary item.... 1,776 847 1,260 974 1,091 Extraordinary gain (loss), net of tax................................ -- 660 (8) -- (17) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Net income.......................... 1,776 1,507 1,252 974 1,074 Dividends on preferred and preference stock................... 19 20 21 72 44 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Earnings available for common stockholders....................... $ 1,757 $ 1,487 $ 1,231 $ 902 $ 1,030 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Common Stock Data(d) Shares of common stock outstanding Year-end.......................... 739 733 726 720 718 Weighted average.................. 736 729 722 720 722 Earnings per share (before extraordinary item) Basic............................. $ 2.39 $ 1.13 $ 1.72 $ 1.26 $ 1.45 Diluted........................... 2.38 1.13 1.71 1.25 1.44 Earnings per share Basic............................. $ 2.39 $ 2.04 $ 1.70 $ 1.26 $ 1.43 Diluted........................... 2.38 2.03 1.70 1.25 1.42 Dividends per share................. 1.10 1.10 1.10 0.95 0.79 Balance Sheet Total assets........................ $58,176 $33,409 $26,806 $24,029 $22,366 Long-term debt, less current maturities......................... 11,019 8,683 6,272 6,530 5,485 Common Stock Data by Quarter(c) 2000 1999 ----------------------- ----------------------- Stock Price Stock Price Range Range Dividends ------------- Dividends ------------- Per Share High Low Per Share High Low --------- ------ ------ --------- ------ ------ First quarter................... $0.275 $28.94 $23.19 $0.275 $32.34 $27.41 Second quarter.................. 0.55 31.25 26.16 0.55 30.59 26.06 Third quarter................... -- 42.88 28.31 -- 29.25 26.22 Fourth quarter.................. 0.275 44.97 40.22 0.275 28.44 23.53 - -------- (a) Financial information reflects a pre-tax $407 million gain on the sale of Duke Energy's investment in BellSouth PCS. The earnings-per-share effect of this gain was $0.34 per share. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. (b) Financial information reflects a pre-tax $800 million charge for estimated injury and damages claims. The earnings-per-share effect of this charge was $0.67 per share. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. (c) Financial information reflects accounting for the 1997 merger with PanEnergy Corp as a pooling of interests. As a result, the financial information gives effect to the merger as if it had occurred January 1, 1996. (d) Restated to reflect the two-for-one common stock split effective January 26, 2001. S-30 BUSINESS Overview We are a Fortune 100 Company that is an integrated energy and energy services provider with the ability to offer physical delivery and management of both electricity and natural gas throughout the United States and abroad. We provide these and other services through our seven business segments: . Franchised Electric . Natural Gas Transmission . Field Services . North American Wholesale Energy . International Energy . Other Energy Services . Duke Ventures Through these business segments we utilize our technical expertise, extensive market knowledge, sophisticated risk management skills and our financial strength and flexibility to develop and actively manage a multi- national portfolio of strategic energy assets. In 2000, we generated $49.3 billion of revenue, $4.0 billion in earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) and $1.8 billion of net income. The following chart illustrates the contribution to EBIT by our primary business segments: [Graphic: Contribution of 2000 EBIT] - -------- (1) Includes a pre-tax gain of $407 million attributable to the sale by DukeNet of its 20% interest in BellSouth PCS. (2) Includes Other Energy Services, other operations and minority interests. Business Segment Overview Franchised Electric Franchised Electric generates, transmits, distributes and sells electric energy over a service area covering 22,000 square miles with an estimated population of 5.3 million people in central and western portions of North Carolina and the western portion of South Carolina. Franchised Electric supplies electric service directly to approximately 2 million residential, commercial and industrial customers over 66,200 miles of distribution lines and a 12,700-mile transmission system. Three nuclear generating stations with a combined net capacity of 5,409 MW, eight coal-fired stations with a combined capacity of 7,572 MW, 31 hydroelectric stations with a combined capacity of 2,693 MW and six combustion turbine stations with a combined capacity of 2,081 MW S-31 comprise our Franchised Electric generation portfolio. In sum, these plants represent a combined net capacity of approximately 17,755 MW. In addition, energy and capacity are supplied through contracts with other generators of electricity and purchased on the open market. The following charts illustrate our sources of electric energy and revenues by customer type in 2000. [2 Graphics: 2000 Sources of Franchised Electric Energy; 2000 Franchised Electric Revenues] Our operations are conducted primarily through Duke Power and Nantahala Power and Light. Franchised Electric is subject to the rules and regulations of the North Carolina Utilities Commission, The Public Service Commission of South Carolina and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Demand for electricity from Franchised Electric's system is seasonal, with the highest output occurring in the summer cooling and winter heating seasons. Electric Industry Restructuring. We continue to monitor progress toward a more competitive environment and have actively participated in regulatory reform deliberations in North Carolina and South Carolina. Currently, however, movement toward retail deregulation in these states seems to be slowing as a consequence of recent developments related to deregulation of the electric industry in California. Legislation. In May 1997, North Carolina passed a bill that established a study commission to examine whether competition should be implemented in the state. Members of this commission include legislators, customers, utilities and a member of an environmental group. The study commission unanimously approved a set of recommendations on electric restructuring in April 2000. The commission's report to the legislature containing these recommendations was submitted to the General Assembly in May. The report basically recommended retail deregulation beginning partially in 2005 and fully in 2006. However, recent events in California's power market have led the study commission to evaluate whether, and to what extent, proposed legislation should be introduced in 2001. In general, the commission has expressed interest in ensuring that a viable wholesale electric market is in place prior to opening the state's retail electric market. A task force formed by the South Carolina Senate is also examining issues related to deregulation of the state's electric utility business. Legislators anticipate that legislation is likely to be introduced during 2001. This task force will prepare a report for review, discussion and possible legislative action by the state's Senate Judiciary Committee and General Assembly as a whole. Regional Transmission Organizations. On December 20, 1999 and February 25, 2000, FERC issued its Order 2000 and Order 2000-A regarding Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs). In these orders, FERC stressed the voluntary nature of RTO participation by utilities and set minimum characteristics and functions that must be met by utilities that participate in an RTO, including exclusive and independent authority to propose rates, terms and conditions of transmission service provided over the facilities the RTO operates. The order provides for an open, flexible structure for RTOs to meet the needs of the market and provides for the possibility of incentive rate making and other benefits for utilities that participate in an RTO. As a result of these rulemakings, on October 16, 2000, we and two other investor-owned utilities, Progress Energy and South Carolina Electric & Gas, filed with FERC to establish GridSouth Transco, LLC (GridSouth), S-32 as an RTO. If approved, GridSouth will be a for-profit, independent transmission company, responsible for operating and planning the companies' combined transmission systems. The target date for formation of GridSouth is December 15, 2001. However, the actual date that GridSouth becomes operational will depend upon the resolution of all necessary regulatory approvals and all technical issues. Natural Gas Transmission Natural Gas Transmission provides interstate transportation and storage of natural gas for customers through 12,000 miles of pipeline connecting the Gulf Coast, mid-continent and Canadian natural gas supplies to markets in the rapidly growing northeastern and southeastern regions. Natural Gas Transmission's pipeline operations consist of Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company and East Tennessee Natural Gas Company. Last year these pipelines transported 1,717 TBtu, representing approximately 25% of eastern U.S. natural gas consumption. Additionally, Duke Energy owns 37.5% of Maritimes & Northeast pipeline, which is the first pipeline to transport natural gas from offshore Nova Scotia to the Maritimes Provinces of Canada and New England. Consistent with our growth strategy, Duke Energy and The Williams Companies, Inc. announced the closing on February 1, 2001 of their joint purchase of Coastal Corporation's Gulfstream Natural Gas System L.L.C. The planned 744-mile Gulfstream gas pipeline will originate near Mobile, Alabama, and cross the Gulf of Mexico to Manatee County, Florida. Additionally, through Market Hub Partners, a wholly owned subsidiary, we own natural gas salt cavern facilities in Texas and Louisiana with a total storage capacity of 23 billion cubic feet. The interstate natural gas transmission and storage operations are subject to the rules and regulations of FERC. A majority of the delivered volumes of Natural Gas Transmission's interstate pipelines represents gas transported under long-term firm service agreements with local distribution company (LDC) customers in the pipelines' market areas. Firm transportation services are also provided under contract to gas marketers, producers, other pipelines, electric power generators and a variety of end- users. In addition, the pipelines provide both firm and interruptible transportation to customers on a short-term or seasonal basis. Demand for gas transmission of Natural Gas Transmission's interstate pipeline systems is seasonal, with the highest throughput occurring during the winter heating season. Duke Energy's interstate pipeline subsidiaries compete with other interstate and intrastate pipeline companies in the transportation and storage of natural gas. The principal elements of competition among pipelines are rates, terms of service, and flexibility and reliability of service. Natural gas competes with other forms of energy available to Duke Energy's customers and end-users, including electricity, coal and fuel oils. The primary competitive factor is price. Changes in the availability or price of natural gas and other forms of energy, the level of business activity, conservation, legislation and governmental regulations, the capability to convert to alternative fuels, and other factors, including weather, affect the demand for natural gas in the areas served by Duke Energy. Field Services Field Services gathers, processes, transports, markets and stores natural gas and produces, transports, markets and stores natural gas liquids (NGLs). Its operations are conducted primarily through Duke Energy Field Services, LLC (DEFS), a limited liability company that is approximately 30% owned by Phillips Petroleum. DEFS has become one of the nation's largest natural gas gatherers, the largest NGLs producer and one of the largest NGLs marketers. We currently own and operate approximately 57,000 miles of natural gas gathering systems, 68 natural gas processing plants in the United States and Canada and one high- deliverability natural gas storage facility. Field Services gathers raw natural gas from production wellheads through gathering pipelines in western Canada and 11 contiguous states that serve major gas-producing regions in the Rocky Mountains, Permian S-33 Basin, East Texas-Austin Chalk-North Louisiana, Mid-Continent and onshore and offshore Gulf Coast areas. Our geographically diverse operations have a critical mass that allows us to take advantage of opportunities in strategically located areas. Natural gas processing operations involve the extraction of NGLs into their individual components (ethane, propane, butane and natural gasoline). Field Services sells NGLs to a variety of customers ranging from large, multi-national petrochemical and refining companies to small, family-owned retail propane distributors. DEFS currently gathers and transports approximately 7.9 billion cubic feet of raw natural gas, produces approximately 415,000 barrels of NGLs and markets and trades approximately 500,000 barrels of NGLs each day. Field Services competes with major integrated oil companies, major interstate pipelines, national and local natural gas gatherers, brokers, marketers and distributors for natural gas supplies, in gathering and processing natural gas and in marketing and transporting natural gas and NGLs. Competition for natural gas supplies is based primarily on the efficiency and reliability of operations, the availability of transportation to high-demand markets and the ability to obtain a satisfactory price for the producer's natural gas. Competition for customers is based primarily upon reliability and price of delivered natural gas and NGLs. North American Wholesale Energy North American Wholesale Energy's activities include: . asset development, operation, management and divestiture, primarily through Duke Energy North America, LLC (DENA); . commodity sales and services related to natural gas and electricity, primarily through Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, LLC (DETM), a limited liability company that is approximately 40% owned by Exxon Mobil Corporation; and . development of new business lines in the evolving energy commodity markets through Duke Energy Merchants. DENA is an integrated energy business that develops, owns and manages a portfolio of merchant generation facilities. To capture the greatest value, DENA, through its portfolio management strategy, seeks opportunities to invest in markets which have capacity needs and to divest assets when significant value can be realized. We are able to more efficiently build and manage power projects by combining our project development, commercial and risk management expertise with the technical and operational skills of other Duke Energy business units. The DENA portfolio includes: Ownership Name MW Fuel Location Interest - --------------------------------- ----- --------------- -------------- --------- Moss Landing..................... 1,478 Natural gas CA 100% Morro Bay........................ 1,002 Natural gas CA 100 South Bay........................ 700 Natural gas CA 100 Madison.......................... 640 Natural gas OH 50 Vermillion....................... 640 Natural gas IN 50 Maine Independence............... 520 Natural gas ME 100 Bridgeport....................... 480 Natural gas CT 67 American Ref-Fuel................ 286 Waste-to-energy CT, MA, NJ, NY 37 St. Francis...................... 247 Natural gas MO 50 Oakland.......................... 165 Oil CA 100 Fort Drum........................ 50 Coal NY 10 ----- Total............................ 6,208 DENA has approximately 7,300 MW under construction in various high-growth markets, which are slated for completion to meet summer peak demand: 3,200 MW in 2001 and 4,100 MW in 2002. In addition to our S-34 facilities in operation or under construction, we have approximately 13,500 MW in advanced development scheduled to begin operation between 2002 and 2004. DENA also supplies competitively priced energy, integrated logistics and asset optimization services as well as risk management products to wholesale energy customers. Integration with trading and marketing operations provides seamless management of operations and trading optimization of Duke Energy's merchant generation facilities. DENA's generation portfolio experiences substantial competition from existing utility companies as well as other merchant electric generation companies in the United States. DETM markets natural gas, electricity and other energy-related products to electric power generators, municipalities, large industrial end-users, investor-owned utilities and energy marketing companies across North America. DETM is the second-ranked gas marketer and the third-ranked power marketer in the United States. DETM has a portfolio of short-term and long-term sales agreements with customers, the vast majority of which incorporate market-sensitive pricing terms. Long-term gas purchase agreements with producers, principally entered into in connection with on-system supplies, also generally include market- sensitive pricing provisions. Purchases and sales of off-system gas and electricity supplies are normally made under short-term contracts. Purchase and sales commitments involving significant price and location risk are generally hedged with offsetting commitments and commodity futures, swaps and options. Duke Energy Merchants provides energy, financial and asset management services to producers, transporters and users of global energy commodities and derivative products in the major focus regions of the Gulf of Mexico shelf, onshore Gulf Coast region and Canada. This also includes certain other trading activities and limited hydrocarbon exploration and production activities that are wholly owned by Duke Energy. We are able to enhance our returns on our physical assets by creating a working environment that enables the more efficient flow of information between our trading and marketing business and our merchant businesses that own and operate the physical assets. These enhanced returns are achieved through the timely communication of information regarding dispatch and maintenance of generation plants, commodity positions for gas and electricity, forward pricing curves and other market knowledge. Our trading and marketing businesses compete with major integrated oil companies, major interstate pipelines and their marketing affiliates, electric utilities, brokers, marketers and distributors for natural gas supplies and in marketing natural gas, electricity and other energy commodities. Competition in the energy marketing business is driven by the price of commodities and services delivered, along with the quality and reliability of services provided. International Energy International Energy conducts its operations through Duke Energy International, LLC (DEI). Through our combination of electric power and natural gas capabilities, we have the commercial expertise, technical skills and financial strength to take advantage of opportunities in today's rapidly changing international markets. DEI's activities are focused on building regional energy businesses that include development, operation, management and divestiture of natural gas and electric power facilities and energy trading and marketing of natural gas and electricity. We continue to focus on regional markets in Latin America and Asia Pacific for further expansion, where deregulation, privatization and liberalization are opening energy markets to competition. We are evaluating opportunities to implement these same strategies in Europe. Latin America is one of the fastest-growing energy markets in the world today. Market liberalization and privatization are leading to increased investments in infrastructure and the emergence of competitive energy markets throughout Latin America. DEI targets growth opportunities in natural gas transmission, greenfield generation and privatization of generation. We currently own and operate energy facilities in six countries: S-35 Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, El Salvador and Peru. With 26 facilities representing approximately 4,800 MW of generation in operation or under construction, we are actively building a trading and marketing business to optimize our energy asset positions and pursuing opportunities to open energy markets to further competition. Converging worldwide energy markets are creating investment opportunities in Australia and other parts of the Asia Pacific region. Since entering Australia in 1998, we have provided our customers the integrated energy services needed to meet the demands of newly competitive wholesale energy markets. We have five facilities, totaling 824 MW of generation in operation or under construction and approximately 1,700 miles of natural gas pipelines. In 2000 DEI established itself in Europe as an energy trading and marketing company with the purchase of an independent gas marketing company in the Netherlands. We intend to build upon this initial platform through other commodity-trading opportunities and offer additional energy and risk management services to meet the changing needs of energy customers throughout Europe. We continue to evaluate opportunities to buy or develop energy asset positions to enhance our trading and marketing portfolio. Competitors in these markets are other multi-national energy companies and local private and public utilities. Other Energy Services Other Energy Services is a combination of businesses that provide engineering, consulting, construction and integrated energy solutions worldwide, primarily through Duke/Fluor Daniel, Duke Engineering & Services, Inc. and DukeSolutions, Inc. Duke/Fluor Daniel, operating through several entities, provides full service siting, permitting, licensing, engineering, procurement, construction, start- up, operating and maintenance services for fossil-fired plants, both domestically and internationally. Subsidiaries of Duke Energy and Fluor Corporation each own 50% of Duke/Fluor Daniel. Duke Engineering & Services specializes in energy and environmental projects worldwide and provides comprehensive engineering, construction, management and operations services for all phases of power generation, transmission and distribution projects. DukeSolutions provides energy consulting services to large end users of energy offering strategic solutions to reduce costs when customers buy energy, convert it into a usable form, use it to manufacture products and dispose of any waste. Other Energy Services experiences substantial competition from utilities and independent companies in the United States and abroad. Duke Ventures Duke Ventures is comprised of other diverse businesses, primarily operating through Crescent Resources, DukeNet Communications, and Duke Capital Partners. Crescent Resources develops high-quality commercial, residential and multi- family real estate projects and manages land holdings primarily in the southeastern United States. DukeNet Communications is the telecommunications arm of Duke Energy. It provides fiber optic networks for industrial, commercial and residential customers and, in the future, enabling networks for energy services applications. It owns and operates a 700-mile fiber optic communications network centered in the Carolinas that is interconnected with a 15,500-mile, fiber optic communications network, through affiliate agreements with third parties, that stretches from Maine to Texas. Duke Capital Partners, a merchant finance company, provides financing, investment banking and asset management services to wholesale and commercial energy markets. S-36 MANAGEMENT The following table provides information regarding our executive officers. Name Age Position - ---- --- -------- Richard B. Priory....... 54 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer William A. Coley........ 57 Group President, Duke Power Fred J. Fowler.......... 55 Group President, Energy Transmission Harvey J. Padewer....... 53 Group President, Energy Services Richard W. Blackburn.... 58 Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Robert P. Brace......... 50 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Richard J. Osborne...... 50 Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer Ruth G. Shaw............ 53 Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer Michael S. Tuckman...... 56 Executive Vice President, Nuclear Generation, Duke Power David L. Hauser......... 49 Senior Vice President and Treasurer Sandra P. Meyer......... 46 Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller Richard B. Priory, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Priory was President and Chief Operating Officer from 1994 to 1997 when he was elected to his present position. William A. Coley, Group President, Duke Power. Mr. Coley served as President of Duke Energy's Associated Enterprises Group from 1994 to 1997 when he was named to his present position. Fred J. Fowler, Group President, Energy Transmission. Before assuming his present position in 1997, Mr. Fowler had been Group Vice President of PanEnergy Corp since 1996. Harvey J. Padewer, Group President, Energy Services. Prior to joining Duke Energy in 1999, Mr. Padewer served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of Utilicorp Energy Group from 1995 through 1998. Richard W. Blackburn, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Before being named to his present position in 1997, Mr. Blackburn was President and Group Executive of NYNEX Corporation's Worldwide Communications and Media Group from 1995 to 1997. Robert P. Brace, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Brace joined Duke Energy in 2000. He had served as group finance director of British Telecommunications plc from 1993 until that time. Richard J. Osborne, Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer. Mr. Osborne served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1997 to 2000 before being named to his present position. Ruth G. Shaw, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer. Ms. Shaw was Senior Vice President, Corporate Resources, from 1994 to 1997 when she was elected to her present position. Michael S. Tuckman, Executive Vice President, Nuclear Generation, Duke Power. Mr. Tuckman assumed his present position in 1997. He had been Senior Vice President, Nuclear Generation, Duke Power, since 1993. David L. Hauser, Senior Vice President and Treasurer. Mr. Hauser held various positions, including Controller, at Duke Power before being named Senior Vice President, Global Asset Development, in 1997 and to his current position in 1998. Sandra P. Meyer, Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller. Ms. Meyer assumed her present position in 1999. She had served as Vice President, Duke Power Planning and Finance, since 1997. S-37 UNITED STATES FEDERAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR NON-U.S. HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK Overview The following general discussion summarizes the material U.S. federal income and estate tax aspects of the ownership and disposition of our common stock applicable to beneficial owners that are non-U.S. holders of such stock. In general, a "non-U.S. holder" is an individual or entity other than: . a citizen or resident of the United States; . a corporation (including any entity taxable as a corporation) or partnership created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any of its political subdivisions; . an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; . a trust if a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over administration of the trust and one or more of the individuals or entities described above have authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust; or . a trust that has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person. This discussion is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), U.S. Treasury regulations, Internal Revenue Service rulings and pronouncements and judicial decisions now in effect, all of which are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. The discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal taxation, including the fact that in the case of a non- U.S. holder that is a partnership, the U.S. tax consequences of holding and disposing of shares of common stock may be affected by determinations made at the partner level and the activities of the partnership. The discussion does not consider any specific facts or circumstances that may apply to a particular non-U.S. holder and does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income tax law that may be important to non-U.S. holders subject to special treatment under such law, such as insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, financial institutions, dealers in securities or currencies, holders whose "functional currency" is not the U.S. dollar, holders of securities held as part of a straddle, hedge or conversion transaction, some U.S. expatriates, controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment companies or foreign personal holding companies. The discussion also does not address any U.S. state, local or foreign tax consequences. Dividends A distribution on our common stock will constitute a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. In general, the gross amount of dividends paid to a non-U.S. holder will be subject to U.S. withholding tax at a 30% rate or a lower rate prescribed by an applicable tax treaty. A non-U.S. holder of our common stock who wishes to claim the benefit of an applicable treaty will be required to satisfy applicable certification requirements. In addition, in the case of common stock held by a foreign partnership, this requirement may be applied to the partners, and not to the partnership, and the partnership must provide some required information. A look-through rule applies in the case of tiered partnerships. Disposition of Common Stock A non-U.S. holder of our common stock will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on gains realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of such stock unless (1) such non-U.S. holder is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the sale, exchange or other disposition, and other required conditions are met, (2) such gain is effectively connected with the conduct by the non-U.S. holder of a trade or business in the United States and, if an applicable income tax treaty requires, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment maintained by the non-U.S. holder, (3) the non-U.S. holder is subject to S-38 Code provisions applicable to some U.S. expatriates, or (4) in the case of common stock held by a person who holds (or held at any time within the shorter of the five-year period preceding such sale or other disposition or the period such non-U.S. holder held the common stock) more than 5% of such stock, we are or have been at any such time a U.S. real property holding corporation within the meaning of the Code. Income or Gains Effectively Connected With A U.S. Trade or Business If a non-U.S. holder of our common stock is engaged in a trade or business in the United States and if dividends on the common stock or gain realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of the common stock is effectively connected with the conduct of such trade or business and, if an applicable tax treaty requires, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment maintained by the non-U.S. holder in the United States, the non-U.S. holder will generally be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such dividends or gain on a net income basis in the same manner as if the non-U.S. holder were a U.S. holder. Such a non-U.S. holder will be required to provide us with a properly executed Internal Revenue Service Form W-8ECI in order to claim an exemption from U.S. withholding tax. In addition, if such non-U.S. holder is a foreign corporation, it may be subject to a branch profits tax equal to 30%, or such lower rate provided by an applicable U.S. income tax treaty, of a portion of its effectively connected earnings and profits for the taxable year. Estate Tax Common stock owned, or treated as owned, by an individual holder that is not a citizen or resident of the United States at the time of death will be includible in the individual's gross estate for U.S. federal estate tax purposes and may be subject to U.S. federal estate tax, unless an applicable treaty provides otherwise. Estates of non-resident aliens are generally allowed a statutory credit which has the effect of offsetting the U.S. estate tax imposed on the first $60,000 of the taxable estate. Backup Withholding and Information Reporting A non-U.S. holder may need to comply with certification procedures in order to avoid backup withholding tax with respect to our payments of dividends on the common stock. We must report annually to the Internal Revenue Service and to each non-U.S. holder the amount of dividends paid to, and the tax withheld with respect to, such holder. Copies of these information returns may also be made available under the provisions of a specific treaty or agreement to the tax authorities of a country in which the non-U.S. holder resides. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a non-U.S. holder of common stock will be allowed as a refund or credit against such holder's U.S. federal income tax provided that the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service in a timely manner. In addition, information reporting and backup withholding will apply to the proceeds of a disposition of our common stock paid to or through a U.S. office of a broker unless the non-U.S. holder certifies under penalties of perjury as to such holder's non-U.S. status or otherwise establishes an exemption. Information reporting and backup withholding will generally not apply to a payment of disposition proceeds outside the United States through a non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker. Information reporting, but not backup withholding, will apply to a payment of proceeds outside the United States if the payment is made through an office of a broker that is (i) a U.S. person, (ii) a foreign person that derives 50% or more of its gross income for certain periods from the conduct of a trade or business in the United States, (iii) a controlled foreign corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or (iv) a foreign partnership that at any time during its taxable year is 50% or more owned by U.S. persons or is engaged in a U.S. trade or business, unless the broker maintains documentary evidence that the holder is a non-U.S. person and other conditions are met. S-39 UNDERWRITING Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an underwriting agreement dated March , 2001, the underwriters named below, for whom Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Banc of America Securities LLC, Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, Goldman, Sachs & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and UBS Warburg LLC are acting as representatives, have severally agreed to purchase, and we have agreed to sell to them, the number of shares of common stock listed opposite their names below. Underwriter Number of Shares ----------- ---------------- Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated............................ Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated........................................ Banc of America Securities LLC............................... Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation....................... Goldman, Sachs & Co. ........................................ J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. ................................. UBS Warburg LLC.............................................. ----------- Total................................................... 25,000,000 =========== The underwriters have agreed to purchase all of the shares of common stock sold under the underwriting agreement if any of these shares are purchased. If an underwriter defaults, the underwriting agreement provides that the purchase commitments of the nondefaulting underwriters may be increased or the underwriting agreement may be terminated. The underwriters are offering the shares of common stock, subject to prior sale, when, as and if issued to and accepted by them, subject to approval of legal matters by their counsel, including the validity of the shares, and other conditions contained in the underwriting agreement, such as the receipt by the underwriters of officers' certificates and legal opinions. The underwriters reserve the right to withdraw, cancel or modify offers to the public and to reject orders in whole or in part. We have granted an option to the underwriters to purchase up to 3,750,000 additional shares of common stock at the public offering price less the underwriting discount. The underwriters may exercise this option for 30 days from the date of this prospectus supplement solely to cover any over- allotments. If the underwriters exercise this option, each will be obligated, subject to conditions contained in the underwriting agreement, to purchase approximately the same percentage of additional shares of common stock as the number set forth next to the underwriter's name in the preceding table bears to the total number of shares of common stock set forth next to the names of all underwriters in the preceding table. If the underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full, the total price to the public would be $ , the total underwriting discount would be $ and the total proceeds, before expenses, to us would be $ . The expenses of the offering, not including the underwriting discount, are estimated at $ . The underwriters have agreed to pay a portion of such expenses. The representatives have advised us that the underwriters propose initially to offer the shares of common stock to the public at the initial public offering price on the cover page of this prospectus supplement and to dealers at that price less a concession not in excess of $ per share. The underwriters may allow, and the dealers may reallow, a discount not in excess of $ per share to other dealers. After the public offering, the public offering price, concession and discount may be changed. We and our executive officers have each agreed that, subject to certain exceptions, without the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated S-40 on behalf of the underwriters, we will not, during the 90-day period after the date of this prospectus supplement: .offer, pledge, sell or contract to sell any shares of common stock, .sell any option or contract to purchase any shares of common stock, .purchase any option or contract to sell any shares of common stock, .grant any option, right or warrant for the sale of any shares of common stock, .lend or otherwise dispose of or transfer any shares of common stock, or . enter into any swap or other agreement that transfers, in whole or in part, the economic consequence of ownership of any shares of common stock, whether any such swap or transaction is to be settled by delivery of shares or other securities, in cash or otherwise. This lock-up provision applies to shares of common stock and to securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for or repayable with shares of common stock. It also applies to shares of common stock owned now or acquired later by the person executing the agreement or for which the person executing the agreement later acquires the power of disposition. This agreement does not apply to issuances under our employee or director compensation plans or our employee or shareholder investment plans. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, in their sole discretion, may release any of the securities subject to these lock-up agreements at any time without notice. Until the distribution of the shares offered hereby is completed, SEC rules may limit the underwriters and selling group members from bidding for or purchasing shares of common stock. However, the representatives may engage in transactions that stabilize the price of shares of common stock, such as bids or purchases that peg, fix or maintain that price. In connection with the offering, the underwriters may make short sales of our shares of common stock. Short sales involve the sale by the underwriters, at the time of the offering, of a greater number of shares than they are required to purchase in the offering. Covered short sales are sales made in an amount not greater than the over-allotment option. The representatives may close out any covered short position by either exercising the over-allotment option or purchasing shares in the open market. In determining the source of shares to close out the covered short position, the representatives will consider, among other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase the shares through the over-allotment option. Naked short sales are sales in excess of the over-allotment option. The representatives must close out any naked short position by purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the representatives are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering. Similar to other purchase transactions, the purchases by the representatives to cover syndicate short positions may have the effect of raising or maintaining the market price of the common stock or preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the common stock. As a result, the price of the common stock may be higher than it would otherwise be in the absence of these transactions. Neither we nor any of the underwriters make any representation or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect that the transactions described above may have on the price of the common stock. In addition, neither we nor any of the underwriters make any representation that the representatives will engage in these transactions or that these transactions, once commenced, will not be discontinued without notice. A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the websites maintained by one or more of the underwriters participating in this offering. The representatives may agree to allocate a number of shares to underwriters for sale to their online brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be allocated by the underwriters that will make internet distributions on the same basis as other allocations. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Online, Inc. and Merrill Lynch will be facilitating distribution for this offering to certain of their internet S-41 subscription customers. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated intend to allocate a limited number of shares for sale to their online brokerage customers. An electronic preliminary prospectus supplement is available on the internet website maintained by Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Online, Inc. and on the internet website maintained by Merrill Lynch. Other than the preliminary prospectus supplement in electronic format, the information on the Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Online, Inc. website and on the Merrill Lynch website is not intended to be part of this prospectus supplement. We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933. In the ordinary course of business, certain of the underwriters and their affiliates have provided financial advisory, investment banking and general financing and banking services to us and certain of our affiliates for customary fees. S-42 EXPERTS The consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus supplement have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their report, included herein, and are included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing. LEGAL MATTERS The validity of the common stock offered hereby will be passed on for us by Dewey Ballantine LLP and for the underwriters by Brown & Wood LLP. S-43 INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Duke Energy Corporation Independent Auditors' Report............................................... F-2 Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998............................................................. F-3 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998....................................................... F-4 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999............... F-5 Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998............... F-7 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................................. F-8 F-1 Independent Auditors' Report To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Duke Energy Corporation We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Duke Energy Corporation and subsidiaries (Duke Energy) as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, common stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of Duke Energy's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Duke Energy as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Deloitte & Touche LLP Charlotte, North Carolina January 18, 2001 F-2 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME Years Ended December 31, ---------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ------- ------- ------ (in millions, except per share amounts) Operating Revenues Sales, trading and marketing of natural gas and petroleum products (Notes 1 and 7).................. $28,310 $10,922 $7,854 Trading and marketing of electricity (Notes 1 and 7).................................................. 13,060 3,610 2,788 Generation, transmission and distribution of electricity (Notes 1 and 4)......................... 5,315 4,934 4,586 Transportation and storage of natural gas (Notes 1 and 4).............................................. 1,045 1,139 1,450 Gain on sale of equity investment (Notes 2 and 8).... 407 -- -- Other (Note 8)....................................... 1,181 1,161 984 ------- ------- ------ Total operating revenues........................... 49,318 21,766 17,662 ------- ------- ------ Operating Expenses Natural gas and petroleum products purchased (Note 1).................................................. 27,670 10,636 7,497 Net interchange and purchased power (Notes 1, 4 and 5).................................................. 12,000 3,507 2,916 Fuel used in electric generation (Notes 1 and 11).... 781 764 767 Other operation and maintenance (Notes 4, 11 and 14)................................................. 3,469 3,701 2,738 Depreciation and amortization (Notes 1 and 5)........ 1,167 968 909 Property and other taxes............................. 418 371 350 ------- ------- ------ Total operating expenses........................... 45,505 19,947 15,177 ------- ------- ------ Operating Income....................................... 3,813 1,819 2,485 ------- ------- ------ Other Income and Expenses Deferred returns and allowance for funds used during construction (Note 1)............................... 63 82 88 Other, net........................................... 138 142 74 ------- ------- ------ Total other income and expenses.................... 201 224 162 ------- ------- ------ Earnings Before Interest and Taxes..................... 4,014 2,043 2,647 Interest Expense (Notes 7 and 10)...................... 911 601 514 Minority Interest Expense (Notes 2 and 12)............. 307 142 96 ------- ------- ------ Earnings Before Income Taxes........................... 2,796 1,300 2,037 Income Taxes (Notes 1 and 6)........................... 1,020 453 777 ------- ------- ------ Income Before Extraordinary Item....................... 1,776 847 1,260 Extraordinary Gain (Loss), net of tax.................. -- 660 (8) ------- ------- ------ Net Income............................................. 1,776 1,507 1,252 Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock (Note 13).. 19 20 21 ------- ------- ------ Earnings Available For Common Stockholders............. $ 1,757 $ 1,487 $1,231 ======= ======= ====== Common Stock Data (Note 1) Weighted average shares outstanding.................. 736 729 722 Earnings per share (before extraordinary item) Basic.............................................. $ 2.39 $ 1.13 $ 1.72 Diluted............................................ $ 2.38 $ 1.13 $ 1.71 Earnings per share Basic.............................................. $ 2.39 $ 2.04 $ 1.70 Diluted............................................ $ 2.38 $ 2.03 $ 1.70 Dividends per share.................................. $ 1.10 $ 1.10 $ 1.10 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. F-3 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Years Ended December 31, ---------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ------ ------ ------ (in millions) CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net income............................................ $1,776 $1,507 $1,252 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization......................... 1,348 1,151 1,055 Net mark-to-market gain............................... (464) (24) (75) Extraordinary (gain) loss, net of tax................. -- (660) 8 Gain on sale of equity investment..................... (407) -- -- Provision on NAWE receivables......................... 110 -- -- Injury and damages accrual............................ -- 800 -- Deferred income taxes................................. 152 (210) (35) Purchased capacity levelization....................... 138 104 88 Transition cost recoveries (payments), net............ 82 95 (28) (Increase) decrease in Receivables.......................................... (4,812) (659) (18) Inventory............................................ (97) (89) (104) Other current assets................................. (796) (138) (39) Increase (decrease) in Accounts payable..................................... 4,509 477 72 Taxes accrued........................................ (439) (57) (6) Interest accrued..................................... 64 32 (2) Other current liabilities............................ 1,116 73 84 Other, net............................................ (55) 282 79 ------ ------ ------ Net cash provided by operating activities........... 2,225 2,684 2,331 ------ ------ ------ CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Capital and investment expenditures................... (5,634) (5,936) (2,500) Proceeds from sale of subsidiaries and equity investment........................................... 400 1,900 -- Decommissioning, retirements and other................ 204 236 24 ------ ------ ------ Net cash used in investing activities............... (5,030) (3,800) (2,476) ------ ------ ------ CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from the issuance of Long-term debt........................................ 3,206 3,221 1,357 Guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in subordinated notes of Duke Energy Corporation or Subsidiaries......................................... -- 484 581 Common stock and stock options........................ 230 162 176 Payments for the redemption of Long-term debt........................................ (1,191) (1,505) (698) Preferred and preference stock........................ (33) (20) (180) Net change in notes payable and commercial paper...... 1,484 58 (350) Distributions to minority interests................... (1,216) -- -- Contributions from minority interests................. 1,116 -- -- Dividends paid........................................ (828) (822) (814) Other................................................. (54) 22 6 ------ ------ ------ Net cash provided by financing activities........... 2,714 1,600 78 ------ ------ ------ Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents.. (91) 484 (67) Cash received from business acquisitions.............. 100 49 38 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period...... 613 80 109 ------ ------ ------ Cash and cash equivalents at end of period............ $ 622 $ 613 $ 80 ====== ====== ====== Supplemental Disclosures Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized..... $ 817 $ 541 $ 490 Cash paid for income taxes............................ $1,177 $ 732 $ 733 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. F-4 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS December 31, --------------- 2000 1999 ------- ------- (in millions) ASSETS ------ Current Assets (Note 1) Cash and cash equivalents (Note 7)........................... $ 622 $ 613 Receivables (Notes 1 and 7).................................. 8,293 3,248 Inventory.................................................... 736 599 Current portion of natural gas transition costs (Note 4)..... -- 81 Current portion of purchased capacity costs (Note 5)......... 149 146 Unrealized gains on mark-to-market transactions (Note 7)..... 11,038 1,131 Other (Note 7)............................................... 1,317 353 ------- ------- Total current assets....................................... 22,155 6,171 ------- ------- Investments and Other Assets Investments in affiliates (Notes 8 and 14)................... 1,370 1,299 Nuclear decommissioning trust funds (Note 11)................ 717 703 Pre-funded pension costs (Note 17)........................... 304 315 Goodwill, net (Notes 1 and 2)................................ 1,566 844 Notes receivable............................................. 462 154 Unrealized gains on mark-to-market transactions (Notes 1 and 7).......................................................... 4,218 690 Other........................................................ 1,445 705 ------- ------- Total investments and other assets......................... 10,028 4,710 ------- ------- Property, Plant and Equipment (Notes 1, 5, 9, 10 and 11) Cost......................................................... 34,615 30,436 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization............... 10,146 9,441 ------- ------- Net property, plant and equipment.......................... 24,469 20,995 ------- ------- Regulatory Assets and Deferred Debits (Note 1) Purchased capacity costs (Note 5)............................ 356 497 Deferred debt expense (Note 7)............................... 208 223 Regulatory asset related to income taxes..................... 506 500 Other (Notes 4 and 14)....................................... 400 313 ------- ------- Total regulatory assets and deferred debits................ 1,470 1,533 ------- ------- Total Assets............................................... $58,176 $33,409 ======= ======= See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. F-5 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS--(Continued) December 31, ---------------- 2000 1999 ------- ------- (in millions) LIABILITIES AND COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY ------------------------------------------- Current Liabilities Accounts payable........................................... $ 7,375 $ 2,312 Notes payable and commercial paper (Notes 7 and 10)........ 1,826 267 Taxes accrued (Note 1)..................................... 261 685 Interest accrued........................................... 208 139 Current maturities of long-term debt and preferred stock (Notes 10 and 13)......................................... 470 515 Unrealized losses on mark-to-market transactions (Notes 1 and 7).................................................... 11,070 1,241 Other (Notes 1 and 14)..................................... 1,769 717 ------- ------- Total current liabilities................................ 22,979 5,876 ------- ------- Long-term Debt (Notes 7 and 10).............................. 11,019 8,683 ------- ------- Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities (Note 1) Deferred income taxes (Note 6)............................. 3,851 3,402 Investment tax credit (Note 6)............................. 211 225 Nuclear decommissioning costs externally funded (Note 11).. 717 703 Environmental cleanup liabilities (Note 14)................ 100 101 Unrealized losses on mark-to-market transactions (Note 7).. 3,581 438 Other (Note 14)............................................ 1,574 2,099 ------- ------- Total deferred credits and other liabilities............. 10,034 6,968 ------- ------- Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 5, 11 and 14) Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests in Subordinated Notes of Duke Energy Corporation or Subsidiaries (Notes 7 and 12)................................................... 1,406 1,404 ------- ------- Minority Interests (Note 2).................................. 2,435 1,200 ------- ------- Preferred and Preference Stock (Notes 7 and 13) Preferred and preference stock with sinking fund requirements.............................................. 38 71 Preferred and preference stock without sinking fund requirements.............................................. 209 209 ------- ------- Total preferred and preference stock..................... 247 280 ------- ------- Common Stockholders' Equity (Notes 1, 15 and 16) Common stock, no par, 1 billion shares authorized; 739 million and 733 million shares outstanding at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively............................... 4,797 4,603 Retained earnings.......................................... 5,379 4,397 Accumulated other comprehensive income..................... (120) (2) ------- ------- Total common stockholders' equity........................ 10,056 8,998 ------- ------- Total Liabilities and Common Stockholders' Equity........ $58,176 $33,409 ======= ======= See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. F-6 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Accumulated Other Total Common Retained Comprehensive Comprehensive Stock Earnings Income Total Income ------ -------- ------------- ------- ------------- (in millions) Balance December 31, 1997.................... $4,284 $3,256 $ -- $ 7,540 Net income............... 1,252 1,252 $1,252 ------ Total comprehensive income.............. $1,252 ====== Dividend reinvestment and employee benefits (Note 16)..................... 165 165 Common stock dividends... (794) (794) Preferred and preference stock dividends (Note 13)............... (21) (21) Other capital stock transactions, net....... 8 8 ------ ------ ----- ------- Balance December 31, 1998.................... $4,449 $3,701 $ -- $ 8,150 ------ ------ ----- ------- Net income............... 1,507 1,507 $1,507 Other comprehensive income: Foreign currency translation adjustments (Note 1).. (2) (2) (2) ------ Total comprehensive income.............. $1,505 ====== Dividend reinvestment and employee benefits (Note 16)..................... 154 154 Common stock dividends... (802) (802) Preferred and preference stock dividends (Note 13)............... (20) (20) Other capital stock transactions, net....... 11 11 ------ ------ ----- ------- Balance December 31, 1999.................... $4,603 $4,397 $ (2) $ 8,998 ------ ------ ----- ------- Net income............... 1,776 1,776 $1,776 Other comprehensive income: Foreign currency translation adjustments (Note 1).. (118) (118) (118) ------ Total comprehensive income.............. $1,658 ====== Dividend reinvestment and employee benefits (Note 16)..................... 194 194 Common stock dividends... (809) (809) Preferred and preference stock dividends (Note 13)............... (19) (19) Other capital stock transactions, net....... 34 34 ------ ------ ----- ------- Balance December 31, 2000.................... $4,797 $5,379 $(120) $10,056 ====== ====== ===== ======= See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. F-7 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Consolidation. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of all of Duke Energy Corporation's majority-owned subsidiaries after the elimination of significant intercompany transactions and balances. Investments in other entities that are not controlled by Duke Energy Corporation, but where it has significant influence over operations, are accounted for using the equity method. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Although these estimates are based on management's best available knowledge of current and expected future events, actual results could differ from those estimates. "Duke Energy" is used in these Notes as a collective reference to Duke Energy Corporation and its subsidiaries. Cash and Cash Equivalents. All liquid investments with maturities at date of purchase of three months or less are considered cash equivalents. Inventory. Inventory consists primarily of materials and supplies, natural gas and natural gas liquid (NGL) products held in storage for transmission, processing and sales commitments, and coal held for electric generation. Inventory is recorded at the lower of cost or market, primarily using the average cost method. Accounting for Risk Management and Commodity Trading Activities. Commodity derivatives utilized for trading purposes are accounted for using the mark-to- market method. Under this methodology, these instruments are adjusted to market value, and the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in current period income and are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income as Natural Gas and Petroleum Products Purchased or Net Interchange and Purchased Power, and in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Unrealized Gains or Losses on Mark-to-Market Transactions. Commodity derivatives such as futures, forwards, over-the-counter swap agreements and options are also utilized for non-trading purposes to hedge the impact of market fluctuations in the price of natural gas, electricity and other energy-related products. To qualify as a hedge, the price movements in the commodity derivatives must be highly correlated with the underlying hedged commodity. Under the deferral method of accounting, gains and losses related to commodity derivatives that qualify as hedges are recognized in income when the underlying hedged physical transaction closes and are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income as Natural Gas and Petroleum Products Purchased, or Net Interchange and Purchased Power. If the commodity derivative is no longer sufficiently correlated to the underlying commodity, or if the underlying commodity transaction closes earlier than anticipated, the deferred gains or losses are recognized in income. Duke Energy periodically uses interest rate swaps, accounted for under the accrual method, to manage the interest rate characteristics associated with outstanding debt. Interest rate differentials to be paid or received as interest rates change are accrued and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense. The amount accrued as either a payable to or a receivable from counterparties is included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Deferred Debt Expense. Duke Energy also periodically utilizes interest rate lock agreements to hedge interest rate risk associated with new debt issuances. Under the deferral method of accounting, gains or losses on such agreements, when settled, are deferred in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Long-Term Debt and are amortized in the Consolidated Statements of Income as an adjustment to Interest Expense. F-8 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Duke Energy is exposed to foreign currency risk from investments in international affiliates and businesses owned and operated in foreign countries. To mitigate risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations, when possible, contracts are denominated in or indexed to the U.S. dollar or investments may be hedged through debt denominated in the foreign currency. Duke Energy also uses foreign currency derivatives, where possible, to hedge its risk related to foreign currency fluctuations. To qualify as a hedge, there must be a high degree of correlation between price movements in the derivative and the item designated as being hedged. Duke Energy also enters into foreign currency swap agreements to manage foreign currency risks associated with energy contracts denominated in foreign currencies. These agreements are accounted for under the mark-to-market method previously described. Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair value of the net assets of an acquired business. The goodwill created by Duke Energy's acquisitions is amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful lives of the assets, ranging from 10 to 40 years. The amount of goodwill reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, was $1,566 million and $844 million, net of accumulated amortization of $291 million and $218 million, respectively. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on significant goodwill additions. Property, Plant and Equipment. Property, plant and equipment are stated at original cost. Duke Energy capitalizes all construction-related direct labor and material costs, as well as indirect construction costs. Indirect costs include general engineering, taxes and the cost of money. The cost of renewals and betterments that extend the useful life of property, plant and equipment is also capitalized. The cost of repairs and replacements is charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is generally computed using the straight-line method. The composite weighted-average depreciation rates, excluding nuclear fuel, were 3.97%, 3.73% and 3.82% for 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. When property, plant and equipment maintained by Duke Energy's regulated operations are retired, the original cost plus the cost of retirement, less salvage, is charged to accumulated depreciation and amortization. When entire regulated operating units are sold or non-regulated properties are retired or sold, the property and related accumulated depreciation and amortization accounts are reduced, and any gain or loss is recorded in income, unless otherwise required by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. The recoverability of long-lived assets and intangible assets are reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Such evaluation is based on various analyses, including undiscounted cash flow projections. Unamortized Debt Premium, Discount and Expense. Premiums, discounts and expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of currently outstanding long-term debt are amortized over the terms of the respective issues. Any call premiums or unamortized expenses associated with refinancing higher-cost debt obligations used to finance regulated assets and operations are amortized consistent with regulatory treatment of those items. Environmental Expenditures. Environmental expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations and do not contribute to current or future revenue generation are expensed. Environmental expenditures relating to current or future revenues are expensed or capitalized as appropriate. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or cleanups are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Cost-Based Regulation. Duke Energy's regulated operations are subject to the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of F-9 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Regulation." Accordingly, certain assets and liabilities that result from the regulated ratemaking process are recorded that would not be recorded under generally accepted accounting principles for non-regulated entities. These regulatory assets and liabilities are classified in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Regulatory Assets and Deferred Debits, and Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities, respectively. The applicability of SFAS No. 71 is routinely evaluated, and factors such as regulatory changes and the impact of competition are considered. Discontinuing cost-based regulation or increasing competition might require companies to reduce their asset balances to reflect a market basis less than cost and to write off their associated regulatory assets. Management cannot predict the potential impact, if any, of discontinuing cost- based regulation or increasing competition on future consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. However, Duke Energy continues to position itself to effectively meet these challenges by maintaining competitive prices. Common Stock Options. Duke Energy accounts for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic method of accounting. Under this method, compensation cost, if any, is measured as the excess of the quoted market price of Duke Energy's stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Restricted stock grants and Company Performance Awards are recorded as compensation cost over the requisite vesting period based on the market value on the date of the grant. Pro forma disclosures utilizing the fair value accounting method are included in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. All outstanding common stock amounts and compensation awards have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one common stock split effective January 26, 2001. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the stock split. Revenues. Revenues on sales of electricity and transportation and storage of natural gas are recognized as service is provided. Revenues on sales of natural gas and petroleum products, as well as electricity, gas and other energy products marketed, are recognized in the period of delivery. The allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $200 million and $43 million as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheets included $244 million and $207 million as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively, for electric service that has been provided but not yet billed to customers. When rate cases are pending final approval, a portion of the revenues is subject to possible refund. Reserves are established where required for such cases. During 2000, Duke Energy adopted the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 101 issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The impact of adopting SAB 101 was not material to Duke Energy. Nuclear Fuel. Amortization of nuclear fuel is included in the Consolidated Statements of Income as Fuel Used in Electric Generation. The amortization is recorded using the units-of-production method. Deferred Returns and Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC). Deferred returns represent the estimated financing costs associated with funding certain regulatory assets. These regulatory assets primarily arose from the funding of purchased capacity costs above levels collected in rates. Deferred returns are non-cash items and are primarily recognized as an addition to Purchased Capacity Costs with an offsetting credit to Other Income and Expenses. AFUDC represents the estimated debt and equity costs of capital funds necessary to finance the construction of new regulated facilities. AFUDC is a non-cash item and is recognized as a cost of Property, Plant and Equipment, with offsetting credits to Other Income and Expenses and to Interest Expense. After construction is completed, Duke Energy is permitted to recover these costs, including a fair return, through their inclusion in rate base and in the provision for depreciation. Rates used for capitalization of deferred returns and AFUDC by Duke Energy's regulated operations are calculated in compliance with FERC rules. F-10 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Foreign Currency Translation. Assets and liabilities of Duke Energy's international operations, where the local currency is the functional currency, have been translated at year-end exchange rates, and revenues and expenses have been translated using average exchange rates prevailing during the year. Adjustments resulting from translation are included in the Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income as Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments. The financial statements of international operations, where the U.S. dollar is the functional currency, reflect certain transactions denominated in the local currency that have been remeasured in U.S. dollars. The remeasurement of local currencies into U.S. dollars resulting from foreign currency gains and losses is included in consolidated net income. Income Taxes. Duke Energy and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. Deferred income taxes have been provided for temporary differences. Temporary differences occur when events and transactions recognized for financial reporting result in taxable or tax-deductible amounts in different periods. Investment tax credits have been deferred and are being amortized over the estimated useful lives of the related properties. Earnings Per Common Share. Basic earnings per share is based on a simple weighted average of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other agreements to issue common stock, such as stock options, were exercised or converted into common stock. The numerator for the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share is earnings available for common stockholders. Denominator for Earnings per Share 2000 1999 1998 ----- ----- ----- (in millions) Denominator for basic earnings per share (weighted- average shares outstanding)............................ 735.7 729.3 722.0 Assumed exercise of diluted stock options............... 3.7 1.6 2.4 ----- ----- ----- Denominator for diluted earnings per share.............. 739.4 730.9 724.4 ===== ===== ===== All common stock amounts have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one common stock split effective January 26, 2001. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the stock split. Extraordinary Items. In 1999, Duke Energy realized an extraordinary gain of $660 million after tax, or $0.91 per share, relating to the sale of certain pipeline companies. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the extraordinary item. In January 1998, TEPPCO Partners, LP (TEPPCO), in which Duke Energy has a 21.1% ownership interest, redeemed certain First Mortgage Notes. A non-cash extraordinary loss of $8 million, net of income tax of $5 million, was recorded related to costs of the early retirement of debt. Earnings per common share for 1998 were reduced by $0.01 as a result of this charge. New Accounting Standard. In June 1998, SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," was issued. Duke Energy was required to adopt this standard by January 1, 2001. SFAS No. 133 requires that all derivatives be recognized as either assets or liabilities and measured at fair value, and changes in the fair value of derivatives are reported in current earnings, unless the derivative is designated and effective as a hedge. If the intended use of the derivative is to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, a liability or a firm commitment, then changes in the fair value of the derivative F-11 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) instrument will generally be offset in the income statement by changes in the hedged item's fair value. However, if the intended use of the derivative is to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, then changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument will generally be reported in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI). The gains and losses on the derivative instrument that are reported in OCI will be reclassified to earnings in the periods in which earnings are impacted by the hedged item. Duke Energy has determined the effect of implementing SFAS No. 133 and recorded a net-of-tax cumulative-effect adjustment of $96 million as a reduction in earnings. The net-of-tax cumulative-effect adjustment reducing OCI and Common Stockholders' Equity is estimated to be $921 million on January 1, 2001. Currently, there are ongoing discussions surrounding the implementation and interpretation of SFAS No. 133 by the Financial Accounting Standards Board's Derivatives Implementation Group. Duke Energy implemented SFAS No. 133 based on current rules and guidance in place as of January 1, 2001. However, if the definition of derivative instruments is altered, this may impact Duke Energy's transition adjustment amounts and subsequent reported operating results. Reclassifications. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified in the Consolidated Financial Statements to conform to the current presentation. 2. Business Acquisitions and Dispositions Business Acquisitions: For acquisitions accounted for using the purchase method, assets and liabilities have been consolidated as of the purchase date and earnings from the acquisitions have been included in consolidated earnings of Duke Energy subsequent to the purchase date. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their estimated fair values, and the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net identifiable assets and liabilities acquired is recorded as goodwill. Purchase price allocations are subject to adjustment when additional information concerning asset and liability valuations becomes available within one year after the acquisition. Market Hub Partners (MHP). In September 2000, Duke Energy, through a wholly owned subsidiary, completed the approximately $400 million acquisition of MHP from subsidiaries of NiSource Inc. for approximately $250 million in cash and the assumption of $150 million in debt. MHP provides natural gas storage services in Louisiana and Texas with a current capacity of 23 billion cubic feet with significant expansion capabilities. Approximately $159 million of goodwill was recorded in the transaction and is being amortized on a straight- line basis over 35 years. In association with the acquisition of MHP, a tender offer was made for $115 million of the assumed debt as required by the debt agreements. As of December 31, 2000, approximately $88 million of this debt was retired. Phillips Petroleum's Gas Gathering, Processing and Marketing Unit (Phillips). In March 2000, Duke Energy, through a wholly owned subsidiary, completed the approximately $1.7 billion transaction that combined Field Services' and Phillips' gas gathering, processing and marketing business to form a new midstream company, named Duke Energy Field Services, LLC (DEFS). In connection with the combination, DEFS issued approximately $2.75 billion of commercial paper in April 2000. The proceeds were used to make one-time cash distributions of approximately $1.53 billion to Duke Energy and $1.22 billion to Phillips Petroleum. Duke Energy owns approximately 70% of DEFS and Phillips Petroleum owns approximately 30%. Goodwill of approximately $429 million was recorded in connection with the transaction and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 20 years. F-12 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) East Tennessee Natural Gas Company. In March 2000, Duke Energy, through a wholly owned subsidiary, completed the approximately $390 million acquisition of East Tennessee Natural Gas Company from El Paso Energy. East Tennessee Natural Gas Company owns a 1,100-mile interstate natural gas pipeline system that crosses Duke Energy's Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation's (TETCO's) pipeline and serves the southeastern region of the U.S. Dominion Resources' Hydroelectric, Natural Gas and Diesel Power Generation Businesses. In August 1999, Duke Energy, through its wholly owned subsidiary Duke Energy International, LLC (DEI), reached a definitive agreement to acquire Dominion Resources Inc.'s 1,200-megawatt portfolio of hydroelectric, natural gas and diesel power generation businesses in Latin America (collectively, the "Dominion acquisitions") for approximately $405 million. The Dominion acquisitions were completed in April 2000, and total goodwill related to these purchases was $109 million and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 40 years. Companhia de Geracao de Energia Eletrica Paranapanema (Paranapanema). In January 2000, Duke Energy, through its wholly owned subsidiary DEI, completed a series of transactions to purchase for approximately $1.03 billion an approximate 95% interest in Paranapanema, an electric generating company in Brazil. Goodwill of approximately $134 million was recorded in relation to this acquisition and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 40 years. Union Pacific Resources' Gathering, Processing and Marketing Operations. In March 1999, Duke Energy through its wholly owned subsidiary, Duke Energy Field Services, Inc., completed the $1.35 billion acquisition of the natural gas gathering, processing, fractionation and NGL pipeline business from Union Pacific Resources (UPR), as well as UPR's NGL marketing activities. Goodwill of $135 million has been recorded and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 to 20 years. Dispositions: BellSouth Carolina PCS (BellSouth PCS). In September 2000, Duke Energy, through its wholly owned subsidiary DukeNet Communications, LLC (DukeNet), sold its 20% interest in BellSouth PCS for approximately $400 million to BellSouth Corporation. Operating revenues includes the resulting pre-tax gain of $407 million, or an after-tax gain of $0.34 per basic share. Catawba River Associates, LLC (Catawba River). During 2000, Duke Energy formed Catawba River, and third-party, non-controlling, preferred interest holders invested $1,025 million. Catawba River is a limited liability company with separate existence and identity from its members, and the assets of Catawba River are separate and legally distinct from Duke Energy. The preferred interest receives a preferred return equal to an adjusted floating reference rate (approximately 7.847% at December 31, 2000). The results of operations, cash flows and financial position of Catawba River are consolidated with Duke Energy. The preferred interest and the expense attributable to this interest are included in Minority Interests and Minority Interest Expense, respectively, on the Consolidated Financial Statements. PEPL Companies and Trunkline LNG. In March 1999, wholly owned subsidiaries of Duke Energy sold Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company (PEPL), Trunkline Gas Company (Trunkline) and additional storage related to those systems, which substantially comprised the Midwest Pipelines, along with Trunkline LNG Company to CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). The sales price of $2.2 billion involved cash proceeds of $1.9 billion and CMS' assumption of existing PEPL debt of approximately $300 million. The sale resulted in an extraordinary gain of $660 million, net of income tax of $404 million, and an increase in earnings per basic share of $0.91. In 1999 and 1998, earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) of $70 million and $156 million, respectively, relating to the Midwest Pipelines was included in Duke Energy's operating results. Under the terms of the sales agreement with CMS, Duke Energy retained certain assets and liabilities, which will not have a material adverse effect on consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. F-13 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) The pro forma results of operations for acquisitions and dispositions do not materially differ from reported results. 3. Business Segments Duke Energy is an integrated energy and energy services provider with the ability to offer physical delivery and management of both electricity and natural gas throughout the U.S. and abroad. Duke Energy provides these and other services through seven business segments. Franchised Electric generates, transmits, distributes and sells electric energy in central and western North Carolina and the western portion of South Carolina. Its operations are conducted primarily through Duke Power and Nantahala Power and Light. These electric operations are subject to the rules and regulations of the FERC, the North Carolina Utilities Commission (NCUC) and the Public Service Commission of South Carolina (PSCSC). Natural Gas Transmission provides interstate transportation and storage of natural gas for customers primarily in the Mid-Atlantic, New England and southeastern states. Its operations are conducted primarily through Duke Energy Gas Transmission Corporation. The interstate natural gas transmission and storage operations are subject to the rules and regulations of the FERC. Field Services gathers, processes, transports, markets and stores natural gas and produces, transports, markets and stores NGLs. Its operations are conducted primarily through DEFS, a limited liability company that is approximately 30% owned by Phillips Petroleum. Field Services operates gathering systems in western Canada and 11 contiguous states that serve major natural gas-producing regions in the Rocky Mountain, Permian Basin, Mid- Continent, East Texas-Austin Chalk-North Louisiana, as well as onshore and offshore Gulf Coast areas. North American Wholesale Energy's (NAWE's) activities include asset development, operation and management, primarily through Duke Energy North America, LLC (DENA), and commodity sales and services related to natural gas and power, primarily through Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, LLC (DETM). DETM is a limited liability company that is approximately 40% owned by Exxon Mobil Corporation. NAWE also includes Duke Energy Merchants, which develops new business lines in the evolving energy commodity markets. NAWE conducts its business throughout the U.S. and Canada. The operations of the previously segregated Trading and Marketing segment were combined by management into NAWE during 2000. Previous periods have been restated to conform to current period presentation. International Energy conducts its operations through DEI. International Energy's activities include asset development, operation and management of natural gas and power facilities and energy trading and marketing of natural gas and electric power. This activity is targeted in the Latin American, Asia- Pacific and European regions. Other Energy Services is a combination of businesses that provide engineering, consulting, construction and integrated energy solutions worldwide, primarily through Duke Engineering & Services, Inc., Duke/Fluor Daniel (D/FD) and DukeSolutions, Inc. D/FD is a 50/50 partnership between Duke Energy and Fluor Enterprises, Inc. Duke Ventures is comprised of other diverse businesses, primarily operating through Crescent Resources, Inc. (Crescent), DukeNet and Duke Capital Partners (DCP). Crescent develops high-quality commercial, residential and multi-family real estate projects and manages land holdings primarily in the southeastern U.S. DukeNet provides fiber optic networks for industrial, commercial and residential customers. DCP, a newly formed, wholly owned merchant finance company, provides financing, investment banking and asset management services to wholesale and commercial energy markets. F-14 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Duke Energy's reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services and are each managed separately. The accounting policies for the segments are the same as those described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Management evaluates segment performance based on EBIT after deducting minority interests. EBIT presented in the accompanying table includes intersegment sales accounted for at prices representative of unaffiliated party transactions. Segment assets are provided as additional information in the accompanying table and are net of intercompany advances, intercompany notes receivable and investments in subsidiaries. Other Operations primarily include certain unallocated corporate items. Business Segment Data Depreciation Capital and Unaffiliated Intersegment Total and Investment Segment Revenues Revenues Revenues EBIT Amortization Expenditures Assets ------------ ------------ -------- ------ ------------ ------------ ------- (in millions) Year Ended December 31, 2000 Franchised Electric..... $ 4,946 $ -- $ 4,946 $1,704 $ 565 $ 661 $12,819 Natural Gas Transmission........... 998 133 1,131 534 131 973 4,995 Field Services.......... 7,601 1,459 9,060 296 240 376 6,266 North American Wholesale Energy................. 33,590 284 33,874 418 75 1,937 28,213 International Energy.... 1,060 7 1,067 331 97 980 4,551 Other Energy Services... 528 167 695 (61) 13 28 543 Duke Ventures........... 642 -- 642 563 17 643 1,967 Other Operations........ (47) 68 21 (2) 29 36 2,749 Eliminations and minority interests..... -- (2,118) (2,118) 231 -- -- (3,927) ------- -------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------- Total consolidated..... $49,318 $ -- $49,318 $4,014 $1,167 $5,634 $58,176 ======= ======== ======= ====== ====== ====== ======= Year Ended December 31, 1999 Franchised Electric..... $ 4,700 $ -- $ 4,700 $ 856 $ 542 $ 759 $13,133 Natural Gas Transmission........... 1,124 106 1,230 627 126 261 3,897 Field Services.......... 2,883 707 3,590 144 131 1,630 3,565 North American Wholesale Energy................. 11,623 178 11,801 209 57 1,028 6,268 International Energy.... 323 34 357 42 58 1,779 4,459 Other Energy Services... 886 103 989 (94) 14 94 612 Duke Ventures........... 232 -- 232 162 13 382 1,031 Other Operations........ (5) 44 39 5 27 3 1,250 Eliminations and minority interests..... -- (1,172) (1,172) 92 -- -- (806) ------- -------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------- Total consolidated..... $21,766 $ -- $21,766 $2,043 $ 968 $5,936 $33,409 ======= ======== ======= ====== ====== ====== ======= Year Ended December 31, 1998 Franchised Electric..... $ 4,626 $ -- $ 4,626 $1,513 $ 522 $ 586 $12,953 Natural Gas Transmission........... 1,440 102 1,542 702 215 290 4,996 Field Services.......... 2,132 545 2,677 76 80 304 1,893 North American Wholesale Energy................. 8,727 56 8,783 133 27 796 4,394 International Energy.... 125 34 159 12 15 239 900 Other Energy Services... 436 85 521 10 12 41 376 Duke Ventures........... 171 -- 171 122 10 232 818 Other Operations........ 5 26 31 22 28 12 874 Eliminations and minority interests..... -- (848) (848) 57 -- -- (398) ------- -------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------- Total consolidated..... $17,662 $ -- $17,662 $2,647 $ 909 $2,500 $26,806 ======= ======== ======= ====== ====== ====== ======= F-15 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Geographic Data Latin Other U.S. Canada America Foreign Consolidated ------- ------ ------- ------- ------------ (in millions) 2000 Consolidated revenues.............. $43,282 $4,964 $ 512 $ 560 $49,318 Consolidated long-term assets...... 31,074 900 2,823 1,222 36,019 1999 Consolidated revenues.............. $19,336 $2,007 $ 171 $ 252 $21,766 Consolidated long-term assets...... 22,995 250 2,708 901 26,854 1998 Consolidated revenues.............. $16,589 $ 996 $ 31 $ 46 $17,662 Consolidated long-term assets...... 20,982 140 207 632 21,961 4. Regulatory Matters Franchised Electric. The NCUC and the PSCSC approve rates for retail electric sales within their respective states. The FERC approves Franchised Electric's rates for electric sales to wholesale customers. Electric sales to the other joint owners of the Catawba Nuclear Station, which represent a majority of Franchised Electric's wholesale revenues, are set through contractual agreements. Fuel costs are reviewed semiannually in the wholesale jurisdiction and annually in the South Carolina retail jurisdiction, with provisions for reviewing such costs in base rates. In the North Carolina retail jurisdiction, a review of fuel costs in rates is required annually and during general rate case proceedings. All jurisdictions allow Duke Energy to adjust electric rates for past over- or under-recovery of fuel costs. Therefore, the difference between actual fuel costs incurred for electric operations and fuel costs recovered through rates is reflected in revenues. On December 20, 1999 and February 25, 2000, the FERC issued its Order 2000 and Order 2000-A regarding Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs). In these orders, the FERC stressed the voluntary nature of RTO participation by utilities and set minimum characteristics and functions that must be met by utilities that participate in an RTO, including exclusive and independent authority to propose rates, terms and conditions of transmission service provided over the facilities it operates. The order provides for an open, flexible structure for RTOs to meet the needs of the market and provides for the possibility of incentive ratemaking and other benefits for utilities that participate in an RTO. As a result of these rulemakings, on October 16, 2000, Duke Energy and two other investor-owned utilities, Progress Energy and South Carolina Electric & Gas, filed with the FERC to establish GridSouth Transco, LLC (GridSouth), as an RTO. If approved, GridSouth will be a for-profit, independent transmission company, responsible for operating and planning the companies' combined transmission systems. The target date for formation of GridSouth is December 15, 2001. However, the actual date that GridSouth becomes operational will depend upon the resolution of all necessary regulatory approvals and resolving all technical issues. Management believes that the establishment of GridSouth will not have a material adverse effect on future consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Natural Gas Transmission. On February 9, 2000, the FERC issued Order 637, which sets forth revisions to its regulations governing short-term natural gas transportation services and policies governing the regulation of interstate natural gas pipelines. "Short-term" has been defined as all transactions of less than one year. F-16 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Among the significant actions taken are the lifting of the price cap for short- term capacity release by pipeline customers for an experimental 2 1/2-year period ending September 1, 2002, and requiring that interstate pipelines file pro forma tariff sheets to (i) provide for nomination equality between capacity release and primary pipeline capacity; (ii) implement imbalance management services (for which interstate pipelines may charge fees) while at the same time reducing the use of operational flow orders and penalties; and (iii) provide segmentation rights if operationally feasible. Order 637 also narrows the right of first refusal to remove economic biases perceived in the current rule. Order 637 imposes significant new reporting requirements for interstate pipelines that were implemented by Duke Energy during the third quarter of 2000. Additionally, Order 637 permits pipelines to propose peak/off-peak rates and term-differentiated rates, and encourages pipelines to propose experimental capacity auctions. By Order 637-A, issued in February 2000, the FERC generally denied requests for rehearing and several parties, including Duke Energy, have filed appeals in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals seeking court review of various aspects of the Order. During the third quarter of 2000, Duke Energy's interstate pipelines made the required pro forma tariff sheet filings. These filings are currently subject to review and approval by the FERC. Management does not believe the effects of these matters will have a material effect on Duke Energy's future consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. 5. Joint Ownership of Generating Facilities Joint Ownership of Catawba Nuclear Station Ownership Owner Interest ----- --------- North Carolina Municipal Power Agency Number 1 (NCMPA)................... 37.5% North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation (NCEMC)................... 28.1% Duke Energy Corporation.................................................. 12.5% Piedmont Municipal Power Agency (PMPA)................................... 12.5% Saluda River Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Saluda River)................... 9.4% ----- 100.0% ===== As of December 31, 2000, $525 million of property, plant and equipment and $268 million of accumulated depreciation and amortization represented Duke Energy's investment in Catawba Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2. Duke Energy's share of operating costs is included in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Duke Energy entered into contractual interconnection agreements with the other joint owners of Catawba Nuclear Station to purchase declining percentages of the generating capacity and energy from the station, which expired during 2000. The portion of purchased capacity costs subject to levelization in rates was deferred. As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, $505 million and $643 million, respectively, associated with the cost of capacity purchased but not reflected in current rates have been accumulated in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Purchased Capacity Costs and Current Portion of Purchased Capacity Costs. Duke Energy is recovering the accumulated balance, including returns on the deferred balance, over a period expected to end in 2004. Jurisdictional levelizations are intended to recover total costs, including deferred returns, and are subject to adjustments, including final true-ups. For the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, purchased capacity and energy costs from the other joint owners were approximately $7 million, $62 million and $88 million, respectively. These amounts, after adjustments for amounts in current rates, are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income as Net Interchange and Purchased Power. F-17 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) The interconnection agreements also provide for supplemental power sales by Duke Energy to the other joint owners of Catawba Nuclear Station to satisfy their capacity and energy needs beyond the capacity and energy which they retain from the station or potentially acquire in the form of other resources. The agreements further provide the other joint owners the ability to secure such supplemental requirements outside of these contractual agreements following an appropriate notice period. NCEMC, Saluda River and NCMPA have given such appropriate notice effective January 1, 2001. PMPA will continue to receive supplemental power sales from Duke Energy through December 31, 2005. As the other joint owners retain more capacity and energy from the station, or obtain additional capacity and energy from a third party, supplemental power sales are expected to decline. Management believes this will not have a material adverse effect on consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. 6. Income Taxes Income Tax Expense For the Years Ended December 31, ------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ------ ----- ---- (in millions) Current income taxes Federal.................................................. $ 679 $ 525 $673 State.................................................... 109 138 138 Foreign.................................................. 18 1 -- ------ ----- ---- Total current income taxes............................. 806 664 811 ------ ----- ---- Deferred income taxes, net Federal.................................................. 187 (126) (15) State.................................................... 13 (65) (4) Foreign.................................................. 29 (1) -- ------ ----- ---- Total deferred income taxes, net....................... 229 (192) (19) ------ ----- ---- Investment tax credit amortization......................... (15) (19) (15) ------ ----- ---- Total income tax expense............................... $1,020 $ 453 $777 ====== ===== ==== Income Tax Expense Reconciliation to Statutory Rate For the Years Ended December 31, ------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ------ ----- ---- (in millions) Income tax, computed at the statutory rate of 35%.......... $ 979 $ 455 $713 Adjustments resulting from: State income tax, net of federal income tax effect....... 75 47 90 Favorable resolution of federal tax issues............... (18) (30) -- Other items, net......................................... (16) (19) (26) ------ ----- ---- Total income tax expense............................... $1,020 $ 453 $777 ------ ----- ---- Effective tax rate......................................... 36.5% 34.9% 38.1% ====== ===== ==== F-18 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Net Deferred Income Tax Liability Components December 31, ---------------- 2000 1999 ------- ------- (in millions) Deferred credits and other liabilities.................... $ 429 $ 500 International property, plant, & equipment................ 153 -- Other..................................................... 10 8 ------- ------- Total deferred income tax assets...................... 592 508 Valuation allowance....................................... (9) (6) ------- ------- Net deferred income tax assets.......................... 583 502 ------- ------- Investments and other assets.............................. (320) (245) Property, plant and equipment............................. (2,707) (2,483) Regulatory assets and deferred debits..................... (326) (427) Regulatory asset related to restating to pre-tax basis.... (429) (432) ------- ------- Total deferred income tax liability................... (3,782) (3,587) ------- ------- State deferred income tax, net of federal tax effect...... (320) (340) ------- ------- Total net deferred income tax liability............... $(3,519) $(3,425) ======= ======= 7. Risk Management and Financial Instruments Commodity Derivatives--Trading. Duke Energy provides risk management services to its customers through forward contracts, futures, over-the-counter swap agreements and options (collectively, "commodity derivatives"). Duke Energy engages in the trading of commodity derivatives, and therefore experiences net open positions, which are managed with strict policies that limit its exposure to market risk and require daily reporting to management of potential financial exposure. These policies include statistical risk tolerance limits using historical price movements to calculate a daily earnings at risk measurement. The weighted-average life of Duke Energy's commodity trading portfolio was approximately 25 months at December 31, 2000. Net Gains Recognized from Trading Activities 2000 1999 1998 ---- ---- ---- (in millions) Natural gas................................................... $212 $83 $114 Electricity................................................... 368 41 14 Other(a)...................................................... 46 -- -- - -------- (a) Other includes refined products, fertilizer, crude oil and other miscellaneous commodities. Absolute Notional Contract Quantity of Commodity Derivatives Held for Trading Purposes December 31, --------------- 2000 1999 ------- ------- Natural gas, in billion cubic feet........................... 39,716 17,248 Electricity, in gigawatt hours............................... 289,109 185,536 Fertilizer contracts, in thousands of tonnes................. 141,619 -- Refined products, in thousands of barrels.................... 451,133 -- F-19 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Fair Values of Commodity Derivatives--Trading 2000 1999 -------------------- ------------------- Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities ------- ----------- ------ ----------- (in millions) Fair values at December 31, Natural gas.......................... $45,423 $45,104 $2,966 $2,855 Electricity.......................... 9,436 9,254 1,302 1,271 Fertilizer contracts................. 5,886 5,850 -- -- Refined products..................... 1,192 1,159 -- -- Other(a)............................. 303 268 -- -- Eliminations......................... (46,984) (46,984) (2,447) (2,447) ------- ------- ------ ------ Total fair values.................. $15,256 $14,651 $1,821 $1,679 ======= ======= ====== ====== Average fair values for the year Natural gas.......................... 20,150 19,801 2,401 2,269 Electricity.......................... 6,650 6,558 962 900 Fertilizer contracts................. 3,002 2,974 -- -- Refined products..................... 1,345 1,309 -- -- Other(a)............................. 437 427 -- -- - -------- (a) Other includes crude oil and other miscellaneous commodities. Commodity Derivatives--Non-Trading. Duke Energy also manages its exposure to risk from existing assets, liabilities and commitments by hedging the impact of market fluctuations. At December 31, 2000 and 1999, Duke Energy held or issued several commodity derivatives, primarily in the form of swaps, that reduce exposure to market price fluctuations for certain power and NGL production facilities. At December 31, 2000, these commodity derivatives extended for periods up to 10 years and generally contain margin requirements. The gains, losses and costs related to non-trading commodity derivatives are not recognized until the underlying physical transaction closes. At December 31, 2000 and 1999, Duke Energy had unrealized net losses of $1,642 million and $120 million, respectively, related to non-trading commodity derivatives. These unrealized losses partially offset the unrealized market value gains related to future cash flows from underlying asset positions. Absolute Notional Contract Quantity of Commodity Derivatives Held for Non- Trading Purposes December 31, ------------- 2000 1999 ------ ------ Natural gas, in billion cubic feet............................. 401 592 Electricity, in gigawatt hours................................. 75,932 45,877 Power capacity, in megawatt months............................. 35,325 25,950 Crude oil, in thousands of barrels............................. 43,991 32,764 Interest Rate Derivatives. Duke Energy periodically enters into financial derivative instruments including, but not limited to, swaps, options and interest rate locks to manage and mitigate interest rate risk related to existing and anticipated borrowings. The notional amounts shown in the following table serve solely as a basis for the calculation of payment streams to be exchanged. These notional amounts are not a measure of Duke Energy's exposure through its use of derivatives. Fair values shown in the following table represent estimated amounts that Duke Energy would have received (paid) if the swaps had been settled at current market rates on the respective dates. F-20 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Interest Rate Derivatives December 31, ------------------------------------------------- 2000 1999 ------------------------ ------------------------ Notional Fair Contracts Notional Fair Contracts Amounts Value Expire Amounts Value Expire -------- ----- --------- -------- ----- --------- (dollars in millions) Fixed-to-floating rate swaps...................... $275 $27 2009 $100 $ 1 2000 Cancelable fixed-to-floating rate swaps................. 630 20 2004-2022 -- -- -- CP(a) floating-to-fixed rate swaps...................... 100 (1) 2001 500 1 2000 Interest rate locks......... 275 (9) 2011 -- -- -- - -------- (a) Commercial paper. Gains and losses that have been deferred in anticipation of planned financing transactions on interest rate swap derivatives have been capitalized and are being amortized over the life of the underlying debt. These deferred gains and losses were not material in 2000 or 1999. As a result of the interest rate swap contracts, interest expense for the relative notional amount is recognized at the weighted-average rates as depicted in the following table. Weighted-Average Rates for Interest Rate Swaps For the Years Ended December 31, ---------------- 2000 1999 1998 ---- ---- ---- Fixed-to-floating rate swaps.................................. 6.50% 5.71% 6.04% Cancelable fixed-to-floating rate swaps....................... 5.09% -- -- Commercial paper swaps........................................ 6.11% 4.95% -- Foreign Currency Derivatives. NAWE enters into foreign currency swap agreements to manage foreign currency risks associated with energy contracts denominated in foreign currencies, primarily in the Canadian dollar. As of December 31, 2000, the agreements had a notional contract amount of approximately $1,396 million, beginning in the year 2001 and extending through the year 2005, and had a weighted-average fixed exchange rate of 1.4672 Canadian dollars to one U.S. dollar. As of December 31, 1999, the agreements had a notional contract amount of approximately $762 million, beginning in the year 2000 and extending to the year 2005, and had a weighted-average fixed exchange rate of 1.470 Canadian dollars to one U.S. dollar. The fair value of foreign currency swap agreements was not material at December 31, 2000 or 1999. Market and Credit Risk. Duke Energy's principal markets for power and natural gas marketing services are industrial end-users and utilities located throughout the U.S., Canada, Asia Pacific and Latin America. Duke Energy has concentrations of receivables from natural gas and electric utilities and their affiliates, as well as industrial customers throughout these regions. These concentrations of customers may affect Duke Energy's overall credit risk in that certain customers may be similarly affected by changes in economic, regulatory or other factors. On all transactions where Duke Energy is exposed to credit risk, Duke Energy analyzes the counterparties' financial condition prior to entering into an agreement, establishes credit limits and monitors the appropriateness of these limits on an ongoing basis. As of December 31, 2000, Duke Energy had approximately $400 million in receivables related to energy sales in California. Duke Energy quantified its exposures with regard to those receivables and recorded a provision of $110 million. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding credit exposure. F-21 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) The change in market value of New York Mercantile Exchange-traded futures and options contracts requires daily cash settlement in margin accounts with brokers. Physical forward contracts and financial derivatives are generally settled at the expiration of the contract term or each delivery period; however, these transactions are also generally subject to margin agreements with the majority of Duke Energy's counterparties. Financial Instruments. The fair value of financial instruments is summarized in the following table. Judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates determined as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, are not necessarily indicative of the amounts Duke Energy could have realized in current markets. The majority of the estimated fair value amounts were obtained from independent parties. Financial Instruments 2000 1999 ------------------- ------------------ Book Approximate Book Approximate Value Fair Value Value Fair Value ------- ----------- ------ ----------- (in millions) Long-term debt(a)....................... $11,456 $12,198 $9,165 $8,891 Guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in subordinated notes of Duke Energy or subsidiaries................. 1,406 1,389 1,404 1,207 Preferred stock(a)...................... 280 275 313 303 - -------- (a) Includes current maturities. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, notes receivable, notes payable and commercial paper are not materially different from their carrying amounts because of the short-term nature of these instruments or because the stated rates approximate market rates. Guarantees made on behalf of affiliates or recourse provisions from affiliates have no book value associated with them, and there are no fair values readily determinable since quoted market prices are not available. 8. Investment in Affiliates Investments in domestic and international affiliates that are not controlled by Duke Energy but where Duke Energy has significant influence over operations are accounted for by the equity method. These investments include undistributed earnings of $70 million and $6 million in 2000 and 1999, respectively. Duke Energy's share of net income from these affiliates is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income as Other Operating Revenues. Natural Gas Transmission. Investments primarily include ownership interests in natural gas pipeline joint ventures which transport natural gas to the U.S. from Canada. Investments include a 37.5% ownership interest in Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, LLC. Field Services. Investments primarily include a 37% interest in a partnership which owns natural gas gathering systems in the Gulf of Mexico (Dauphin Island Gathering Partners) and a 21.1% ownership interest in TEPPCO. North American Wholesale Energy. Significant investments include a 50% indirect interest in VMC Generating Company, a merchant electric generating company, a 32.5% indirect interest in American Ref-Fuel, LLC and a 50% interest in Southwest Power Partners. F-22 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) International Energy. International Energy has investments in various natural gas and electric generation and transmission facilities in its targeted geographic areas. Significant investments include a 25% indirect interest in National Methanol Company, which owns and operates a methanol and MTBE (methyl tertiary butyl ether) business in Jubail, Saudi Arabia. Other Energy Services. Investments include the participation in various construction and support activities for fossil-fueled generating plants. Duke Ventures. Significant investments include various real estate development projects and a 20% interest in the BellSouth PCS joint venture until its sale in 2000. Investment in Affiliates December 31, 2000 December 31, 1999 December 31, 1998 ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ---------------------------- Domestic International Total Domestic International Total Domestic International Total -------- ------------- ------ -------- ------------- ------ -------- ------------- ----- (in millions) Natural Gas Transmission........... $ 82 $ 88 $ 170 $ 67 $ 83 $ 150 $104 $ 37 $141 Field Services.......... 373 -- 373 439 -- 439 303 -- 303 North American Wholesale Energy................. 635 9 644 425 -- 425 171 -- 171 International Energy.... -- 154 154 -- 224 224 -- 223 223 Other Energy Services... 11 7 18 51 6 57 19 23 42 Duke Ventures........... 23 -- 23 10 -- 10 24 -- 24 Other Operations........ (12) -- (12) (6) -- (6) (2) -- (2) ------ ---- ------ ---- ---- ------ ---- ---- ---- Total.................. $1,112 $258 $1,370 $986 $313 $1,299 $619 $283 $902 ====== ==== ====== ==== ==== ====== ==== ==== ==== Equity in Earnings of Investment For the years ended: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- December 31, 2000 December 31, 1999 December 31, 1998 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- Domestic International Total Domestic International Total Domestic International Total -------- ------------- ----- -------- ------------- ----- -------- ------------- ----- (in millions) Natural Gas Transmission........... $ 13 $ 4 $ 17 $ 16 $ 9 $ 25 $ 14 $ 3 $ 17 Field Services.......... 39 -- 39 44 -- 44 9 -- 9 North American Wholesale Energy................. 36 -- 36 47 -- 47 50 -- 50 International Energy.... -- 43 43 -- 10 10 -- 18 18 Other Energy Services... (13) -- (13) 10 3 13 1 13 14 Duke Ventures........... (9) -- (9) (22) -- (22) (29) -- (29) Other Operations........ (10) -- (10) (5) -- (5) -- -- -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Total.................. $ 56 $ 47 $103 $ 90 $ 22 $112 $ 45 $ 34 $ 79 ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== F-23 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Summarized Combined Financial Information of Unconsolidated Affiliates December 31, -------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ------ ------ ------ (in millions) Balance Sheet Current assets........................................... $1,242 $1,544 $ 848 Noncurrent assets........................................ 6,588 7,826 7,340 Current liabilities...................................... 888 1,155 1,084 Noncurrent liabilities................................... 4,404 4,727 3,884 ------ ------ ------ Net assets............................................... $2,538 $3,488 $3,220 ====== ====== ====== Income Statement Operating revenues....................................... $4,617 $3,510 $1,667 Operating expenses....................................... 4,039 3,104 1,166 ------ ------ ------ Net income............................................... 440 193 263 ====== ====== ====== Duke Energy had outstanding notes receivable from certain affiliates of $70 million and $72 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. 9. Net Property, Plant and Equipment December 31, ----------------- 2000 1999 -------- ------- (in millions) Land...................................................... $ 36 $ 25 Plant: Electric generation and transmission.................... 11,734 11,717 Natural gas transmission................................ 11,281 10,290 Gathering and processing facilities..................... 4,434 2,466 Other buildings and improvements........................ 1,339 1,310 Leasehold improvements.................................. 14 8 Nuclear fuel.............................................. 761 741 Equipment................................................. 92 83 Vehicles.................................................. 36 37 Construction in process................................... 2,209 1,220 Other..................................................... 2,679 2,539 -------- ------- Total property, plant and equipment................... 34,615 30,436 Total accumulated depreciation(a)..................... (10,146) (9,441) -------- ------- Total net property, plant and equipment............... $ 24,469 $20,995 ======== ======= - -------- (a) Includes amortization of nuclear fuel: 2000--$503 million; 1999--$444 million. Capitalized interest of $67 million, $52 million and $28 million is included in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. F-24 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) 10. Debt and Credit Facilities Long-term Debt December 31, ----------- Year Due 2000 1999 ---------- ----- ----- (in millions) Duke Energy First and refunding mortgage bonds:(a) 5.875%--6.375%........................................ 2001--2008 $ 625 $ 625 6.750%--8.30%......................................... 2023--2025 661 661 7.0%--8.950%.......................................... 2027--2033 165 165 Pollution control debt, 3.850%--5.80%................... 2012--2017 172 172 Notes: 5.375%--9.210%........................................ 2009--2016 811 264 6.0%--6.60%........................................... 2028--2038 500 500 Commercial paper, 6.510% and 5.840% weighted-average rate at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively(b).... 1,256 1,184 Other debt.............................................. 18 21 Notes matured during 2000............................... -- 200 Duke Capital Corporation Senior notes: 6.250%--7.50%......................................... 2004--2009 1,400 1,250 6.750%--8.50%......................................... 2018--2019 650 650 Commercial paper, 6.660% and 5.910% weighted-average rate at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively(b).. 1,378 535 Note payable to affiliate 6.140% and 5.030% weighted- average rate at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively........................................... 141 86 PanEnergy Corp Bonds: 7.750%................................................ 2022 328 328 8.625% Debentures..................................... 2025 100 100 Notes: 7.0%--9.90%, maturing serially........................ 2003--2006 384 395 TETCO Notes: 7.30%--10.375%........................................ 2001--2010 600 500 Medium-term, Series A, 7.640%--9.070%................. 2001--2012 51 51 Algonquin Gas Transmission Company 9.130% Notes............................................ 2003 100 100 DEFS Notes, 7.50%--8.125%.................................... 2005--2030 1,700 -- Commercial paper, 7.390% weighted-average rate at December 31, 2000...................................... 346 -- DENA Bonds, 7.50%--10.0%..................................... 2010--2030 302 -- Capital leases.......................................... 2009--2028 272 207 Notes matured during 2000............................... -- 380 F-25 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) December 31, --------------- Year Due 2000 1999 ---------- ------- ------ (in millions) DEI Medium-term note, 7.250%.......................... 2004 139 162 Notes: 4.50%--18.0%.................................... 2001--2024 222 107 7.90%........................................... 2004--2013 138 161 6.0%--10.0%(c).................................. 2013--2017 477 485 Credit facilities, 6.130% and 6.010% weighted- average rate at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively..................................... 44 80 Commercial paper, 6.40% and 5.510% weighted- average at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively..................................... 223 49 Crescent(d) Construction and mortgage loans, 6.30%--9.50%..... 2001--2010 67 46 Other debt of subsidiaries........................ 103 34 Unamortized debt discount and premium, net........ (91) (66) ------- ------ Total long-term debt.............................. 13,282 9,432 Current maturities of long-term debt.............. (437) (482) Short-term notes payable and commercial paper..... (1,826) (267) ------- ------ Total long-term portion........................... $11,019 $8,683 ======= ====== - -------- (a) Substantially all of Franchised Electric's plant was mortgaged. (b) Extendible commercial notes are included in the 2000 amounts. (c) Paranapanema (Brazil) debt, principal is indexed annually to inflation. (d) Substantial amounts of Crescent's real estate development projects, land and buildings were pledged as collateral. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding short-term notes payable and commercial paper at December 31, 2000 and 1999, was 6.80% and 5.720%, respectively. Annual Maturities (in millions) ------------- 2001........................................................... $ 437 2002........................................................... 263 2003........................................................... 475 2004........................................................... 956 2005........................................................... 922 Thereafter..................................................... 8,403 ------- Total long-term debt....................................... $11,456 ======= Included in the annual maturities after 2005 is $1,536 million of long-term debt that has call options whereby Duke Energy has the option to repay the debt early. Based on the years in which Duke Energy may first exercise its redemption options, $95 million could potentially be repaid in 2001, $1,114 million in 2002, $227 million in 2003 and $100 million in 2005. F-26 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Credit Facilities December 31, 2000 December 31, 1999 ---------------------- ---------------------- Credit Credit Facilities Outstanding Facilities Outstanding ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- (in millions) 364-day facilities(a)........... $1,796 $ -- $ 823 $ 10 Three-year revolving facilities..................... 84 44 565 450 Four-year revolving facilities.. 125 -- 125 -- Five-year revolving facilities(a).................. 2,200 -- 2,200 -- ------ ----- ------ ---- Total consolidated.......... $4,205 $ 44 $3,713 $460 ====== ===== ====== ==== - -------- (a) Supported commercial paper facilities. 11. Nuclear Decommissioning Costs Nuclear Decommissioning Costs. Estimated site-specific nuclear decommissioning costs, including the cost of decommissioning plant components not subject to radioactive contamination, total approximately $1.9 billion stated in 1999 dollars based on decommissioning studies completed in 1999. This amount includes Duke Energy's 12.5% ownership in the Catawba Nuclear Station. The other joint owners of Catawba Nuclear Station are responsible for decommissioning costs related to their ownership interests in the station. Both the NCUC and the PSCSC have granted Duke Energy recovery of estimated decommissioning costs through retail rates over the expected remaining service periods of Duke Energy's nuclear stations. The operating licenses for Duke Energy's nuclear units are subject to extension. On May 23, 2000, Duke Energy was granted a license renewal for Oconee. The current operating licenses for Duke Energy's nuclear units are as follows: Operating Licenses for Nuclear Units Unit Year ---- ---- McGuire 1............................................................... 2021 McGuire 2............................................................... 2023 Catawba 1............................................................... 2024 Catawba 2............................................................... 2026 Oconee 1 and 2.......................................................... 2033 Oconee 3................................................................ 2034 During 2000 and 1999, Duke Energy expensed approximately $57 million, which was contributed to the external funds for decommissioning costs, and accrued an additional $8 million to the internal reserve. Nuclear units are depreciated at an annual rate of 4.7%, of which 1.61% is for decommissioning. The balance of the external funds as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, was $717 million and $703 million, respectively. The balance of the internal reserve as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, was $231 million and $223 million, respectively, and is reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization. Management believes that the decommissioning costs being recovered through rates, when coupled with expected fund earnings, are currently sufficient to provide for the cost of decommissioning. A provision in the Energy Policy Act of 1992 established a fund for the decontamination and decommissioning of the Department of Energy's (DOE) uranium enrichment plants (the D&D Fund). Licensees are subject to an annual assessment for 15 years based on their pro rata share of past enrichment services. On June 12, 1998, Duke Energy and 21 other utilities filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the D&D Fund and seeking an injunction that prohibits the government from collecting the assessment and a refund of all F-27 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) assessments paid. The annual assessment is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income as Fuel Used in Electric Generation. Duke Energy paid $10 million during 2000 and has paid $85 million cumulatively related to its ownership interests in nuclear plants. The remaining liability and regulatory assets of $62 million and $70 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively, are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities, and Regulatory Assets and Deferred Debits, respectively. Spent Nuclear Fuel. Under provisions of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, Duke Energy has entered into contracts with the DOE for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel. The DOE failed to begin accepting the spent nuclear fuel on January 31, 1998, the date provided by the Nuclear Waste Policy Act and by Duke Energy's contract with the DOE. On June 8, 1998, Duke Energy filed with the U.S. Court of Federal Claims a claim against the DOE for damages in excess of $1 billion arising out of the DOE's failure to begin accepting commercial spent nuclear fuel by January 31, 1998. Damages claimed in the suit are intended to recover costs that Duke Energy is incurring and will continue to incur as a result of the DOE's partial material breach of its contract with Duke Energy, including costs associated with securing additional spent fuel storage capacity. Duke Energy will continue to safely manage its spent nuclear fuel until the DOE accepts it. Payments made to the DOE for disposal costs are based on nuclear output and are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income as Fuel Used in Electric Generation. 12. Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests in Subordinated Notes of Duke Energy or Subsidiaries Duke Energy and certain subsidiaries have each formed business trusts for which they own all the respective common securities. The trusts issue and sell preferred securities and invest the gross proceeds in junior subordinated notes issued by the respective parent companies. Trust Preferred Securities December 31, -------------- Issued Rate Due 2000 1999 ------ ------ ---- ---- ------ (in millions) 1997............................................... 7.20% 2037 $ 350 $ 350 1998............................................... 7.375% 2038 350 350 1998............................................... 7.375% 2038 250 250 1999............................................... 8.375% 2029 250 250 1999............................................... 7.20% 2039 250 250 Unamortized debt discount.......................... (44) (46) ------ ------ $1,406 $1,404 ====== ====== These trust preferred securities represent preferred undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the respective trusts. Payment of distributions on these preferred securities is guaranteed by the respective parent company, but only to the extent the trusts have funds legally and immediately available to make such distributions. Dividends of $108 million, $87 million and $44 million related to the trust preferred securities have been included in the Consolidated Statements of Income as Minority Interest Expense for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. F-28 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) 13. Preferred and Preference Stock Authorized Shares of Stock as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 Par Value Shares --------- ------------ (in millions) Preferred Stock...................................... $100 12.5 Preferred Stock A.................................... $ 25 10.0 Preference Stock..................................... $100 1.5 As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, there were no shares of preference stock outstanding. Preferred Stock with Sinking Fund Requirements Shares Outstanding December 31, Year At December 31, ----------------------- Rate/Series Issued 2000 2000 1999 ----------- ------ --------------- ---- ----------- (dollars in millions) 6.20% D (Preferred Stock A)...... 1992 800,000 $ 20 $ 20 6.30% U.......................... 1992 130,000 13 13 6.40% V.......................... 1992 130,000 13 13 6.75% X.......................... 1993 250,000 25 25 6.10% C (Preferred Stock A)(a)... 1992 -- -- 20 6.20% T(a)....................... 1992 -- -- 13 ---------- ----------- Total........................ $ 71 $ 104 ========== =========== - -------- (a) Preferred stock series C and T redeemed in September and December, 2000, respectively. The annual sinking fund requirements for 2001 through 2005 are $33 million, $13 million, $2 million, $2 million and $2 million, respectively. Some additional redemptions are permitted at Duke Energy's option. Preferred Stock without Sinking Fund Requirements Shares Outstanding December 31, Year At December 31, ------------------------ Rate/Series Issued 2000 2000 1999 ----------- ------ --------------- ----------- ----------- (dollars in millions) 4.50% C......................... 1964 175,000 $ 18 $ 18 7.85% S......................... 1992 300,000 30 30 7.00% W......................... 1993 249,989 25 25 7.04% Y......................... 1993 299,995 30 30 6.375% (Preferred Stock A)...... 1993 1,257,185 31 31 Auction Series A................ 1990 750,000 75 75 ---------- ----------- Total....................... $ 209 $ 209 ========== =========== The call provisions for the outstanding preferred stock specify various redemption prices not exceeding 104% of par value, plus accumulated dividends to the redemption date. F-29 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) 14. Commitments and Contingencies Nuclear Insurance. Duke Energy owns and operates the McGuire and Oconee Nuclear Stations with two and three nuclear reactors, respectively, and operates and has a partial ownership interest in the Catawba Nuclear Station with two nuclear reactors. Nuclear insurance coverage is maintained in three program areas: liability coverage; property, decontamination and decommissioning coverage; and business interruption and/or extra expense coverage. Certain expenses associated with nuclear insurance premiums paid by Duke Energy are reimbursed by the other joint owners of the Catawba Nuclear Station. Pursuant to the Price-Anderson Act, Duke Energy is required to insure against public liability claims resulting from nuclear incidents to the full limit of liability of approximately $9.5 billion. Primary Liability Insurance. The maximum required private primary liability insurance of $200 million has been purchased along with a like amount to cover certain worker tort claims. Excess Liability Insurance. This policy currently provides approximately $9.3 billion of coverage through the Price-Anderson Act's mandatory industry- wide excess secondary insurance program of risk pooling. The $9.3 billion of coverage is the sum of the current potential cumulative retrospective premium assessments of $88 million per licensed commercial nuclear reactor. This $9.3 billion will be increased by $88 million as each additional commercial nuclear reactor is licensed, or reduced by $88 million for certain nuclear reactors that are no longer operational and may be exempted from the risk pooling insurance program. Under this program, licensees could be assessed retrospective premiums to compensate for damages in the event of a nuclear incident at any licensed facility in the nation. If such an incident occurs and public liability damages exceed primary insurances, licensees may be assessed up to $88 million for each of their licensed reactors, payable at a rate not to exceed $10 million a year per licensed reactor for each incident. The $88 million amount is subject to indexing for inflation and may be subject to state premium taxes. Duke Energy is a member of Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL), which provides property and business interruption insurance coverage for Duke Energy's nuclear facilities under the following three policy programs: Primary Property Insurance. This policy provides $500 million in primary property damage coverage for each of Duke Energy's nuclear facilities. Excess Property Insurance. This policy provides excess property, decontamination and decommissioning liability insurance in the following amounts: $2.25 billion for the Catawba Nuclear Station and $1.5 billion each for the Oconee and McGuire Nuclear Stations. Business Interruption Insurance. This policy provides business interruption and/or extra expense coverage resulting from an accidental outage of a nuclear unit. Each unit of the McGuire and Catawba Nuclear Stations is insured for up to approximately $4 million per week and the Oconee Nuclear Station units are insured for up to approximately $3 million per week. Coverage amounts per unit decline if more than one unit is involved in an accidental outage. Initial coverage begins after a 12-week deductible period and continues at 100% for 52 weeks and 80% for the next 110 weeks. If NEIL's losses ever exceed its reserves for any of the above three programs, Duke Energy will be liable for assessments of up to five times its annual premiums. The current potential maximum assessments are as follows: Primary Property Insurance--$18 million; Excess Property Insurance--$18 million; Business Interruption Insurance--$15 million. F-30 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) The other joint owners of the Catawba Nuclear Station are obligated to assume their pro rata share of any liabilities for retrospective premiums and other premium assessments resulting from the Price-Anderson Act's excess secondary insurance program of risk pooling or the NEIL policies. Environmental. Duke Energy is subject to international, federal, state and local regulations regarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal and other environmental matters. Manufactured Gas Plants and Superfund Sites. Duke Energy was an operator of manufactured gas plants until the early 1950s and has entered into a cooperative effort with the State of North Carolina and other owners of certain former manufactured gas plant sites to investigate and, where necessary, remediate these contaminated sites. Duke Energy is considered by regulators to be a potentially responsible party and may be subject to future liability at eight federal Superfund sites and three state Superfund sites. While the cost of remediation of these sites may be substantial, Duke Energy will share in any liability associated with remediation of contamination at such sites with other potentially responsible parties. Management believes that resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. PCB (Polychlorinated Biphenyl) Assessment and Cleanup Programs. In June 1999, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) certified that TETCO, a wholly owned subsidiary of Duke Energy, had completed cleanup of PCB-contaminated sites under conditions stipulated by a U.S. Consent Decree in 1989. TETCO was required to continue groundwater monitoring on a number of sites for two years. This required monitoring was completed as of the end of 2000, pending EPA concurrence. TETCO will be evaluating and discussing with the EPA, appropriate state authorities or both the need for additional remediation or monitoring. Under terms of the sales agreement with CMS discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Duke Energy is obligated to complete cleanup of previously identified contamination resulting from the past use of PCB- containing lubricants and other discontinued practices at certain sites on the PEPL and Trunkline systems. Based on Duke Energy's experience to date and costs incurred for cleanup operations, management believes the resolution of matters relating to the environmental issues discussed above will not have a material adverse effect on consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Air Quality Control. In October 1998, the EPA issued a final rule on regional ozone control that required 22 eastern states and the District of Columbia to revise their State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to significantly reduce emissions of nitrogen oxide by May 1, 2003. The EPA's rule was challenged in court by various states, industry and other interests, including the states of North Carolina and South Carolina, and Duke Energy. In March 2000, the court upheld most aspects of the EPA's rule. The same court subsequently issued a decision that extended the compliance deadline for implementation of emission reductions to May 31, 2004. In January 2000, the EPA finalized another ozone-related rule under Section 126 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) that has virtually identical emission control requirements as its October 1998 action, but with a May 1, 2003 compliance date. The EPA's 2000 rule has been challenged in court. The court is expected to issue its decision during the spring of 2001. In response to the EPA's October 1998 rule, both North Carolina and South Carolina are in the process of finalizing the SIP revisions to implement the EPA rule's emission reduction requirements. Additionally, North Carolina has adopted a separate rule that caps nitrogen oxide emissions from coal-fired power plants in the event the EPA's SIP rule is eventually overturned. Depending on the resolution of these and related matters, management anticipates that costs to Duke Energy may range from $500 million to $900 million in capital costs for additional emission controls over an F-31 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) estimated time period which continues through 2007. Emission control retrofits of this type are large technical, design and construction projects. These projects will be managed closely to ensure the continuation of reliable electric service to Duke Energy's customers throughout the projects and upon their completion. On December 22, 2000, the U.S. Justice Department, acting on behalf of the EPA, filed a complaint against Duke Energy in the U.S. District Court in Greensboro, North Carolina, for alleged violations of the New Source Review (NSR) provisions of the CAA. The EPA is claiming that 29 projects performed at 25 of Duke Energy's coal-fired units were major modifications as defined in the CAA and that Duke Energy violated the CAA's NSR requirements when it undertook those projects without obtaining permits and installing emission controls for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and particulate matter. The complaint requests, among other things, that the court enjoin Duke Energy from operating the coal- fired units identified in the complaint, and order Duke Energy to install additional emission controls and pay unspecified civil penalties. This complaint appears to be part of the EPA's NSR enforcement initiative, in which the EPA claims that utilities and others have committed widespread violations of the CAA permitting requirements for the past 25 years. The EPA has sued or issued notices of violation or investigative information requests, to at least 48 other electric utilities and cooperatives. The EPA's allegations run counter to previous EPA guidance regarding the applicability of the NSR permitting requirements. Duke Energy, along with other utilities, has routinely undertaken the type of repair, replacement, and maintenance projects that the EPA now claims are illegal. Duke Energy believes that all of its electric generation units are properly permitted and have been properly maintained, and intends to defend itself vigorously against these alleged violations. However, because these matters are in a preliminary stage, management cannot estimate the effects of these matters on Duke Energy's future consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. The CAA authorizes civil penalties of up to $27,500 per day per violation at each generating unit. Civil penalties, if ultimately imposed by the court, and the cost of any required new pollution control equipment, if the court accepts the EPA's contentions, could be substantial. Injury and Damages Claims. Duke Energy has experienced numerous claims relating to damages for personal injury alleged to have arisen from the exposure to or use of asbestos in connection with construction and maintenance activities conducted by Duke Energy on its electric generation plants during the 1960s and 1970s. During 1999, Duke Energy experienced a significant increase in the number of these claims. This increase, coupled with its cumulative experience in claims received, prompted Duke Energy to conduct a comprehensive review which was completed in late 1999 and to record an $800 million accrual, which is included in Other Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, to reflect the purchase of a third-party insurance policy as well as estimated amounts for future claims not recoverable under such policy. The insurance policy, combined with amounts covered by self-insurance reserves, provides for claims paid up to an aggregate of $1.6 billion. Duke Energy currently believes the estimated claims relating to this exposure will not exceed such amount. While Duke Energy is uncertain as to the timing of when claims will be received, portions of the estimated claims may not be received and paid for 30 or more years. While Duke Energy has recorded an accrual related to this estimated liability, such estimates cannot be made with certainty. Factors, such as the frequency and magnitude of claims, could result in changes in the estimates of the injury and damages liability and insurance recoveries. Such changes could result in, over time, a difference from the amount currently reflected in the financial statements. However, due to Duke Energy's insurance program relating to this liability, management believes that any changes in the estimates would not have a material adverse effect on consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. California Issues. California Litigation. Duke Energy's subsidiaries, DENA and DETM, have been named among 16 defendants in a class action lawsuit (the Gordon lawsuit) filed against companies identified as F-32 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) "generators and traders" of electricity in California markets. DETM also was named as one of numerous defendants in four additional lawsuits, including two class actions (the Hendricks and Pier 23 Restaurant lawsuits), filed against generators, marketers and traders and other unnamed providers of electricity in California markets. These suits were brought either by or on behalf of electricity consumers in the State of California. The Gordon and Hendricks class action suits were filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, San Diego County, in November 2000. The other three suits were filed in January 2001, one in the Superior Court of the State of California, San Diego County, and the other two in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco. These suits generally allege that the defendants manipulated the wholesale electricity markets in violation of state laws against unfair and unlawful business practices and state antitrust laws. Plaintiffs in the Gordon suit seek aggregate damages of over $4 billion, and the plaintiffs in the other suits, to the extent damages are specified, allege damages in excess of $1 billion. The lawsuits each seek the disgorgement of alleged unlawfully obtained revenues for sales of electricity and, in three suits, an award of treble damages. California Wholesale Electricity Markets. As a result of high prices in the western U.S. wholesale electricity markets in 2000, several state and federal regulatory investigations and complaints have commenced to determine the causes of the prices and potentially to recommend remedial action. The FERC concluded its investigation by issuing on December 15, 2000, an Order Directing Remedies in California Wholesale Electricity Markets. In this conclusion, the FERC found no basis in allegations made by government officials in California that specific electric generators artificially drove up power prices. This conclusion is consistent with similar findings by the Compliance Unit of the California Power Exchange (CalPX) and the Northwest Power Planning Council. That Order is the subject of numerous rehearing requests. At the state level, the California Public Utilities Commission, the California Electricity Oversight Board, the California Bureau of State Audits and the California Office of the Attorney General all have separate ongoing investigations into the high prices and their causes. None of those investigations have been completed and no findings have been made in connection with any of them. California Utilities Defaults and Other Proceedings. Two California electric utilities recently defaulted on many of their obligations to suppliers and creditors. NAWE supplies electric power to these utilities directly and indirectly through contracts through the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) and the CalPX. NAWE also supplies natural gas to these utilities under direct contracts. With respect to electric power sales through the CAISO and CalPX, Duke Energy quantified its exposures at December 31, 2000 to these utilities and recorded a $110 million provision. As a result of these defaults and certain related government actions, Duke Energy has taken a number of steps, including initiating court actions, to mitigate its exposure. While these matters referenced above are in their earliest stages, management does not believe, based on its analysis to date of the factual background and the claims asserted in these matters, that their resolution will have a material adverse effect on Duke Energy's consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Litigation. Exxon Mobil Corporation Arbitration. In December 2000, three subsidiaries of Duke Energy initiated binding arbitration against three subsidiaries of the Exxon Mobil Corporation (collectively, the "Exxon Mobil entities") concerning the parties' joint ownership of DETM and certain related affiliates (collectively, the "Ventures"). At issue is a buy-out right provision in the parties' agreement. The agreements governing the ownership of the Ventures contain provisions giving Duke Energy the right to purchase the Exxon Mobil entities' 40% interest in the Ventures in the event material business disputes arise between the Ventures' owners. Such disputes have arisen, and consequently, Duke Energy exercised its right to buy the Exxon Mobil entities' interest. Duke Energy claims that refusal by the Exxon Mobil entities to honor the F-33 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) exercise is a breach of the buy-out right provision, and seeks specific performance of the provision. Duke Energy also complains of the Exxon Mobil entities' lack of use of, and contributions to, the Ventures. In January 2001, the Exxon Mobil entities asserted counterclaims in the arbitration and claims in a separate Texas state court action alleging that Duke Energy breached its obligations to the Ventures and to the Exxon Mobil entities. The Exxon Mobil entities also claim that Duke Energy violated a Guaranty Agreement. While this matter is in its early stages, management believes that the final disposition of this action will not have a material adverse effect on Duke Energy's consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Other Commitments and Contingencies. Financial Guarantees. Certain subsidiaries of Duke Energy have guaranteed debt agreements of affiliates and have provided surety bonds and letters of credit, all of which totaled approximately $1.9 billion and $853 million as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The increase in the amount of these obligations is primarily due to increasing support for margin deposits and power exchange participation. Leases. Duke Energy utilizes assets under operating leases in several areas of operations. Consolidated rental expense amounted to $90 million, $87 million and $80 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Future minimum rental payments under Duke Energy's various operating leases for the years 2001 through 2005 are $74 million, $60 million, $51 million, $44 million and $38 million, respectively. 15. Common Stock On December 20, 2000, Duke Energy announced a two-for-one common stock split effective January 26, 2001, to shareholders of record on January 3, 2001. All outstanding share and per share amounts have been restated to reflect the stock split, and appropriate adjustments have been made in the exercise price and number of shares subject to stock options along with appropriate adjustments to stock amounts and other employee benefit programs. Effective with the stock split, the quarterly cash dividend rate on common stock is $0.275 per share, subject to declaration from time to time by the Board of Directors. At its December 20, 2000 meeting, the Board of Directors approved a proposal to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from one billion to two billion. Such an increase is subject to shareholder approval at the Duke Energy Corporation Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 26, 2001. 16. Stock-Based Compensation All of the following information regarding outstanding common stock shares and options has been restated to reflect the two-for-one common stock split discussed in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Under Duke Energy's 1998 Long-term Incentive Plan (the 1998 Plan), stock options for up to 30 million shares of common stock may be granted to key employees. Under the 1998 Plan, the exercise price of each option granted is required to be no less than the market price of Duke Energy's common stock on the date of grant. Vesting periods range from one to five years with a maximum term of 10 years. An amendment to the 1998 Plan, subject to shareholder approval at the Duke Energy Corporation Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 26, 2001, will increase the number of shares of common stock available under the 1998 Plan to 60 million shares. F-34 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Stock Option Activity Weighted- Average Exercise Options Price -------------- --------- (in thousands) Outstanding at December 31, 1997....................... 5,459 $12 Granted.............................................. 7,096 29 Exercised............................................ (1,896) 11 Forfeited............................................ (1,736) 29 ------ Outstanding at December 31, 1998....................... 8,923 23 Granted.............................................. 10,308 27 Exercised............................................ (856) 12 Forfeited............................................ (750) 29 ------ Outstanding at December 31, 1999....................... 17,625 25 Granted.............................................. 7,594 41 Exercised............................................ (2,047) 21 Forfeited............................................ (666) 27 ------ Outstanding at December 31, 2000....................... 22,506 31 ====== Stock Options at December 31, 2000 Outstanding Exercisable ----------------------------------- ------------------------ Weighted- Weighted- Weighted- Range of Average Average Average Exercise Remaining Exercise Exercise Prices Number Life Price Number Price -------- ------ --------- --------- ------ --------- (in thousands) (in years) (in thousands) $5 to $7 7 1.3 $ 7 7 $ 7 $8 to $10 944 3.1 10 944 10 $11 to $12 203 3.3 12 203 12 $13 to $16 220 5.1 14 220 14 $21 to $25 6,115 8.9 25 1,532 24 $26 to $30 7,726 7.7 29 2,111 29 $31 to $34 578 8.0 32 185 33 > $34 6,713 10.0 43 -- -- ------ ----- Total 22,506 5,202 $23 ====== ===== Duke Energy had 3.6 million and 3.0 million options exercisable at December 31, 1999 and 1998, with weighted-average exercise prices of $17 and $11 per option, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of options granted was $10, $5 and $4 per option during 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. F-35 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Weighted-Average Assumptions for Option-Pricing 2000 1999 1998 ------- ------- ------- Stock dividend yield.................................... 3.7% 4.1% 4.2% Expected stock price volatility......................... 25.1% 18.8% 15.1% Risk-free interest rates................................ 5.3% 5.9% 5.6% Expected option lives................................... 7 years 7 years 7 years Had compensation expense for stock-based compensation been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates, 2000 net income would have been $1,764 million, or $2.37 per basic share; 1999 net income would have been $1,498 million, or $2.03 per basic share; and 1998 net income would have been $1,250 million, or $1.70 per basic share. Under Duke Energy's 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1996 Plan), four million shares of common stock were reserved for awards to employees. Restricted stock grants made under the 1996 Plan vest over periods ranging from one to five years. Duke Energy awarded 294,526 restricted shares (fair value at grant dates of approximately $8 million) in 2000 and 131,700 restricted shares (fair value at grant dates of approximately $4 million) in 1999. Compensation expense for the grants is charged to earnings over the restriction period and amounted to $4 million in 2000 and was not material in 1999 or 1998. Duke Energy granted Company Performance Awards under the 1998 Plan, under which 30 million shares of common stock have been reserved for employee and outside director awards. These share grants under the 1998 Plan vest over periods ranging between one and seven years. Duke Energy awarded 225,000 of these shares (fair value at grant dates of $7 million) in 2000 and 986,400 of these shares (fair value at grant dates of $26 million) in 1999. Compensation expense for the stock grants is charged to earnings over the vesting period, and amounted to $7 million in 2000, $3 million in 1999 and zero in 1998. 17. Employee Benefit Plans Retirement Plans. Duke Energy and its subsidiaries maintain a non- contributory defined benefit retirement plan covering most employees with minimum service requirements using a cash balance formula. Under a cash balance formula, a plan participant accumulates a retirement benefit based upon a percentage, which may vary with age and years of service, of current eligible earnings and current interest credits. On December 31, 1998, all defined benefit retirement plans maintained by Duke Energy and its subsidiaries, except for the PanEnergy retirement plan, were merged to form the Duke Energy Retirement Cash Balance Plan (the Duke Energy Plan). The plan merger changed the benefit for certain participants, from a formula based primarily on benefit accrual service and highest average earnings, to a cash balance formula. Through December 31, 1998, the PanEnergy retirement plan provided retirement benefits (i) for eligible employees of certain subsidiaries that are generally based on an employee's years of benefit accrual service and highest average eligible earnings, and (ii) for eligible employees of certain other subsidiaries under a cash balance formula. In 1998, a significant amount of lump sum payouts were made from the PanEnergy plan resulting in a settlement gain of $10 million. Effective January 1, 1999, the benefit formula under the PanEnergy plan, for all eligible employees, was changed to a cash balance formula. In connection with the 1999 sale of the Midwest Pipelines to CMS, benefit accruals under the PanEnergy plan were frozen on December 31, 1998, for all participants who, as a result of the sale, became employees of CMS and its subsidiaries. Once the transfer of the benefit obligation and related assets of the affected participants to CMS was completed, the PanEnergy plan was merged into the Duke Energy Plan. F-36 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Duke Energy's policy is to fund amounts, as necessary, on an actuarial basis to provide assets sufficient to meet benefits to be paid to plan participants. No contributions to the Duke Energy Plan were necessary in 2000 or 1999. The net unrecognized transition asset, resulting from the implementation of accrual accounting, is being amortized over approximately 20 years. Components of Net Periodic Pension Costs For the Years Ended December 31, ---------------------- 2000 1999 1998 ------ ------ ------ (in millions) Service cost benefit earned during the year............. $ 70 $ 72 $ 63 Interest cost on projected benefit obligation........... 184 165 169 Expected return on plan assets.......................... (244) (224) (218) Amortization of prior service cost...................... (3) (3) (4) Amortization of net transition asset.................... (4) (4) (4) Recognized net actuarial loss........................... -- 12 10 Settlement gain......................................... -- -- (10) ------ ------ ------ Net periodic pension costs.............................. $ 3 $ 18 $ 6 ====== ====== ====== Reconciliation of Funded Status to Pre-funded Pension Costs December 31, -------------- 2000 1999 ------ ------ (in millions) Change in Benefit Obligation Benefit obligation at beginning of year...................... $2,446 $2,540 Service cost................................................. 70 72 Interest cost................................................ 184 165 Actuarial (gain) loss........................................ 16 (41) Transfer to CMS.............................................. -- (85) Benefits paid................................................ (130) (205) ------ ------ Benefit obligation at end of year............................ $2,586 $2,446 ------ ------ Change in Plan Assets Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year(a)............ $3,121 $2,920 Actual return on plan assets................................. 47 491 Transfer to CMS.............................................. -- (85) Benefits paid................................................ (130) (205) ------ ------ Fair value of plan assets at end of year(a).................. $3,038 $3,121 ------ ------ Funded status................................................ $ 452 $ 675 Unrecognized net experience gain............................. (110) (315) Unrecognized prior service cost reduction.................... (22) (24) Unrecognized net transition asset............................ (16) (21) ------ ------ Pre-funded pension costs..................................... $ 304 $ 315 ====== ====== - -------- (a) Principally equity and fixed-income securities. F-37 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Assumptions Used for Pension Benefits Accounting(a) 2000 1999 1998 ---- ---- ---- (percent) Discount rate.................................................... 7.50 7.50 6.75 Salary increase.................................................. 4.53 4.50 4.67 Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets................. 9.25 9.25 9.25 - -------- (a) Reflects weighted averages across all plans. Duke Energy also sponsors employee savings plans that cover substantially all employees. Employer matching contributions of $66 million, $68 million and $53 million were expensed in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Other Postretirement Benefits. Duke Energy and most of its subsidiaries provide certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees on a contributory and non-contributory basis. Employees become eligible for these benefits if they have met certain age and service requirements at retirement, as defined in the plans. Under plan amendments effective late 1998 and early 1999, health care benefits for future retirees were changed to limit employer contributions and medical coverage. Such benefit costs are accrued over the active service period of employees to the date of full eligibility for the benefits. The net unrecognized transition obligation, resulting from the implementation of accrual accounting, is being amortized over approximately 20 years. Components of Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Costs For the Years Ended December 31, ---------------- 2000 1999 1998 ---- ---- ---- (in millions) Service cost benefit earned during the year................. $ 5 $ 7 $ 10 Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation................................................. 43 40 43 Expected return on plan assets.............................. (23) (21) (18) Amortization of prior service cost.......................... 1 1 7 Amortization of net transition obligation................... 18 18 16 Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss........................ -- (1) 1 ---- ---- ---- Net periodic postretirement benefit costs................... $ 44 $ 44 $ 59 ==== ==== ==== F-38 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Reconciliation of Funded Status to Accrued Postretirement Benefit Costs December 31, ------------ 2000 1999 ----- ----- (in millions) Change in Benefit Obligation Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at beginning of year........................................................ $ 562 $ 625 Service cost................................................. 5 7 Interest cost................................................ 43 40 Plan participants' contributions............................. 7 7 Actuarial (gain) loss........................................ 39 (68) Benefits paid................................................ (42) (49) ----- ----- Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at end of year........................................................ $ 614 $ 562 ----- ----- Change in Plan Assets Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year(a)............ $ 327 $ 305 Actual return on plan assets................................. 8 41 Employer contributions....................................... 25 23 Plan participants' contributions............................. 7 7 Benefits paid................................................ (42) (49) ----- ----- Fair market value of plan assets at end of year(a)........... $ 325 $ 327 ----- ----- Funded status................................................ $(289) $(235) Unrecognized net experience gain............................. (47) (110) Unrecognized prior service cost.............................. 5 8 Unrecognized transition obligation........................... 214 229 ----- ----- Accrued postretirement benefit costs......................... $(117) $(108) ===== ===== - -------- (a) Principally equity and fixed-income securities. Assumptions Used for Postretirement Benefits Accounting(a) 2000 1999 1998 ----- ----- ----- (percent) Discount rate................................................. 7.50 7.50 6.75 Salary increase............................................... 4.53 4.50 4.67 Expected long-term rate of return on assets................... 9.25 9.25 9.25 Assumed tax rate(b)........................................... 39.60 39.60 39.60 - -------- (a) Reflects weighted averages across all plans. (b) Applicable to the health care portion of funded postretirement benefits. For measurement purposes, a 6% average annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2000 and beyond. Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. F-39 DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued) Sensitivity to Changes in Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates 1-Percentage- 1-Percentage- Point Increase Point Decrease -------------- -------------- (in millions) Effect on total service and interest costs.... $ 2 $ (2) Effect on postretirement benefit obligation... 27 (25) 18. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) First Second Third Fourth Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- (In millions, except per share data) 2000 Operating revenues................... $7,290 $10,926 $15,691 $15,411 $49,318 Operating income..................... 812 794 1,501 706 3,813 EBIT................................. 859 837 1,556 762 4,014 Net income........................... 393 329 770 284 1,776 Earnings per share(a) Basic.............................. $ 0.53 $ 0.44 $ 1.04 $ 0.38 $ 2.39 Diluted............................ $ 0.53 $ 0.44 $ 1.03 $ 0.38 $ 2.38 1999 Operating revenues................... $4,178 $ 4,691 $ 6,676 $ 6,221 $21,766 Operating income..................... 645 531 866 (223) 1,819 EBIT................................. 683 568 908 (116) 2,043 Income before extraordinary item..... 307 288 441 (189) 847 Net income........................... 967 288 441 (189) 1,507 Earnings per share (before Extraordinary item)(a) Basic.............................. $ 0.41 $ 0.39 $ 0.60 $ (0.27) $ 1.13 Diluted............................ $ 0.41 $ 0.39 $ 0.60 $ (0.27) $ 1.13 Earnings per share(a) Basic.............................. $ 1.32 $ 0.39 $ 0.60 $ (0.27) $ 2.04 Diluted............................ $ 1.32 $ 0.39 $ 0.60 $ (0.27) $ 2.03 - -------- (a) Restated to reflect the two-for-one common stock split effective January 26, 2001. F-40 PROSPECTUS $2,000,000,000 Duke Energy Corporation Senior Notes Junior Subordinated Notes First and Refunding Mortgage Bonds Common Stock Stock Purchase Contracts Stock Purchase Units ---------------- Duke Energy Capital Trust III Duke Energy Capital Trust IV Duke Energy Capital Trust V Trust Preferred Securities Guaranteed, to the extent described herein, by Duke Energy Corporation ---------------- This prospectus contains summaries of the general terms of these securities. You will find the specific terms of these securities, and the manner in which they are being offered, in supplements to this prospectus. You should read this prospectus and the applicable prospectus supplement carefully before you invest. The Common Stock of Duke Energy is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "DUK." Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. This prospectus is dated December 26, 2000. ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS This prospectus is part of a registration statement that Duke Energy, Duke Energy Capital Trust III, Duke Energy Capital Trust IV and Duke Energy Capital Trust V filed with the SEC utilizing a "shelf" registration process. Under the shelf registration process, Duke Energy may issue Senior Notes, Junior Subordinated Notes, First and Refunding Mortgage Bonds, Common Stock, Stock Purchase Contracts and Stock Purchase Units and the Trusts may issue Preferred Securities in one or more offerings up to a total dollar amount of $2,000,000,000. This prospectus provides general descriptions of the securities Duke Energy and the Trusts may offer. Each time securities are sold, a prospectus supplement will provide specific information about the terms of that offering. The prospectus supplement may also add, update or change information contained in this prospectus. The registration statement filed with the SEC includes exhibits that provide more details about the matters discussed in this prospectus. You should read this prospectus, the related exhibits filed with the SEC and any prospectus supplement, together with the additional information described under the caption "Where You Can Find More Information." DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION Duke Energy, together with its subsidiaries, is an integrated energy and energy services provider with the ability to offer physical delivery and management of both electricity and natural gas throughout the United States and abroad. Duke Energy, directly or through its subsidiaries, provides these and other services through seven business segments: . Franchised Electric . Natural Gas Transmission . Field Services . North American Wholesale Energy . International Energy . Other Energy Services . Duke Ventures Franchised Electric generates, transmits, distributes and sells electric energy in central and western North Carolina and the western portion of South Carolina (doing business as Duke Power or Nantahala Power and Light). Natural Gas Transmission conducts its operations primarily through Duke Energy Gas Transmission Corporation, and provides interstate transportation and storage of natural gas for customers primarily in the Mid-Atlantic, New England and southeastern states. Field Services gathers, processes, transports, markets and stores natural gas, and produces, transports and markets natural gas liquids. Field Services' operations are conducted primarily through Duke Energy Field Services, LLC, a limited liability company that is approximately 30% owned by Phillips Petroleum Company. Field Services operates gathering systems in western Canada and eleven contiguous states that serve major gas-producing regions in the Rocky Mountains, Permian Basin, Mid-Continent, East Texas-Austin Chalk-North Louisiana areas and onshore and offshore Gulf Coast areas. North American Wholesale Energy's activities include asset development, operation and management, primarily through Duke Energy North America, LLC, as well as commodity sales and services related to natural gas and power, primarily through Duke Energy Trading and Marketing 2 (DETM), a joint venture with Exxon Mobil Corporation, a 40% partner in DETM. This segment also includes Duke Energy Merchants, which develops new business lines in the evolving energy commodity markets. North American Wholesale Energy conducts its business throughout the United States and western Canada. International Energy conducts its operations through Duke Energy International, LLC. International Energy's activities include asset development, operation and management of international energy-related facilities, primarily in Latin America, Asia Pacific and Europe. International Energy also provides worldwide energy trading and marketing of natural gas and electric power. Other Energy Services is a combination of certain other businesses that provide engineering, consulting, construction and integrated energy solutions worldwide, primarily through Duke Engineering & Services, Inc., Duke/Fluor Daniel and DukeSolutions, Inc. Duke/Fluor Daniel is a 50/50 partnership between Duke Energy and Fluor Enterprises, Inc. Duke Ventures is comprised of other diverse businesses, primarily operating through Crescent Resources, Inc., DukeNet Communications and Duke Capital Partners. Crescent Resources develops high quality commercial and residential real estate projects and manages land holdings primarily in the southeastern United States. DukeNet Communications provides fiber optic and wireless digital networks for industrial, commercial and residential customers. Duke Capital Partners, a wholly owned merchant finance company, provides financing, investment banking and asset management services to wholesale and commercial energy markets. The foregoing information about Duke Energy and its business segments is only a general summary and is not intended to be comprehensive. For additional information about Duke Energy and its business segments you should refer to the information described under the caption "Where You Can Find More Information." Duke Energy's principal executive offices are located at 526 South Church Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 (telephone (704) 594-6200). Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (unaudited) Nine Months Ended September 30, Year Ended December 31, -------------- --------------------------------- 2000 1999 1999 1998 1997(1) 1996(1) 1995(1) ------ ------ ---- ---- ------- ------- ------- Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.................... 4.3 4.6 2.9 4.7 4.1 4.3 4.0 For purposes of this ratio (a) earnings consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes and fixed charges, and (b) fixed charges consist of all interest deductions and the interest component of rentals. - -------- (1) Data reflects accounting for the stock-for-stock merger of Duke Energy and PanEnergy Corp on June 18, 1997 as a pooling of interests. As a result, the data gives effect to the merger as if it had occurred as of January 1, 1995. 3 USE OF PROCEEDS Unless Duke Energy states otherwise in the accompanying prospectus supplement, Duke Energy intends to use the net proceeds from the sale of any offered securities: . to redeem or purchase from time to time presently outstanding securities when it anticipates those transactions will result in an overall cost savings; . to repay maturing securities; . to finance its ongoing construction program; or . for general corporate purposes. The proceeds from the sale of Preferred Securities by a Trust will be invested in Junior Subordinated Notes issued by Duke Energy. Except as Duke Energy may otherwise describe in the related prospectus supplement, Duke Energy expects to use the net proceeds from the sale of such Junior Subordinated Notes to the applicable Trust for the above purposes. THE TRUSTS Duke Energy formed each Trust as a statutory business trust under Delaware law. Each Trust's business is defined in a trust agreement executed by Duke Energy, as depositor, and Chase Manhattan Bank Delaware. Each trust agreement will be amended when Preferred Securities are issued under it and will be in substantially the form filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part. An amended trust agreement is called a "Trust Agreement" in this prospectus. The Preferred Securities and the Common Securities of each Trust represent undivided beneficial interests in the assets of that Trust. The Preferred Securities and the Common Securities together are sometimes called the "Trust Securities" in this prospectus. The trustees of each Trust will conduct that Trust's business and affairs. Duke Energy, as the holder of the Common Securities of each Trust, will appoint the trustees of that Trust. The trustees of each Trust will consist of: . two officers of Duke Energy as Administrative Trustees; . The Chase Manhattan Bank as Property Trustee; and . Chase Manhattan Bank Delaware as Delaware Trustee. The prospectus supplement relating to the Preferred Securities of a Trust will provide further information concerning that Trust. No separate financial statements of any Trust are included in this prospectus. Duke Energy considers that such statements would not be material to holders of the Preferred Securities because no Trust has any independent operations and the sole purpose of each Trust is investing the proceeds of the sale of its Trust Securities in Junior Subordinated Notes. Duke Energy does not expect that any of the Trusts will be filing annual, quarterly or special reports with the SEC. The principal place of business of each Trust will be c/o Duke Energy Corporation, 526 South Church Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28202, telephone (704) 594-6200. 4 ACCOUNTING TREATMENT Each Trust will be treated as a subsidiary of Duke Energy for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, Duke Energy's consolidated financial statements will include the accounts of each Trust. The Preferred Securities, along with other trust preferred securities that Duke Energy guarantees on an equivalent basis, will be presented as a separate line item in Duke Energy's consolidated balance sheets, entitled "Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests in Subordinated Notes of Duke Energy Corporation or Subsidiaries." Duke Energy will record distributions that each Trust pays on the Preferred Securities as an expense in its consolidated statement of income. DESCRIPTION OF THE SENIOR NOTES Duke Energy will issue the Senior Notes in one or more series under its Senior Indenture dated as of September 1, 1998 between Duke Energy and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee, as supplemented from time to time. The Senior Indenture is an exhibit to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part. The Senior Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and will rank equally with all of Duke Energy's other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. The First and Refunding Mortgage Bonds are effectively senior to the Senior Notes to the extent of the value of the properties securing them. As of September 30, 2000, there were approximately $1,568,000,000 of First and Refunding Mortgage Bonds outstanding. Duke Energy conducts its non-electric operations, and certain of its electric operations outside its service area in the Carolinas, through subsidiaries. Accordingly, its ability to meet its obligations under the Senior Notes is partly dependent on the earnings and cash flows of those subsidiaries and the ability of those subsidiaries to pay dividends or to advance or repay funds to Duke Energy. In addition, the rights that Duke Energy and its creditors would have to participate in the assets of any such subsidiary upon the subsidiary's liquidation or recapitalization will be subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary's creditors. Certain of Duke Energy's subsidiaries have incurred substantial amounts of debt in the expansion of their businesses and Duke Energy anticipates that certain of its subsidiaries will do so in the future. The following description of the Senior Notes is only a summary and is not intended to be comprehensive. For additional information you should refer to the Senior Indenture. General The Senior Indenture does not limit the amount of Senior Notes that Duke Energy may issue under it. Duke Energy may issue Senior Notes from time to time under the Senior Indenture in one or more series by entering into supplemental indentures or by its Board of Directors or a duly authorized committee authorizing the issuance. The form of supplemental indenture to the Senior Indenture is an exhibit to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part. The Senior Notes of a series need not be issued at the same time, bear interest at the same rate or mature on the same date. The Senior Indenture does not protect the holders of Senior Notes if Duke Energy engages in a highly leveraged transaction. 5 Provisions Applicable to Particular Series The prospectus supplement for a particular series of Senior Notes being offered will disclose the specific terms related to the offering, including the price or prices at which the Senior Notes to be offered will be issued. Those terms will include some or all of the following: . the title of the series; . the total principal amount of the Senior Notes of the series; . the date or dates on which principal is payable or the method for determining the date or dates, and any right that Duke Energy has to change the date on which principal is payable; . the interest rate or rates, if any, or the method for determining the rate or rates, and the date or dates from which interest will accrue; . any interest payment dates and the regular record date for the interest payable on each interest payment date, if any; . whether Duke Energy may extend the interest payment periods and, if so, the terms of the extension; . the place or places where payments will be made; . whether Duke Energy has the option to redeem the Senior Notes and, if so, the terms of its redemption option; . any obligation that Duke Energy has to redeem the Senior Notes through a sinking fund or to purchase the Senior Notes through a purchase fund or at the option of the holder; . whether the provisions described under "Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance" will not apply to the Senior Notes; . the currency in which payments will be made if other than U.S. dollars, and the manner of determining the equivalent of those amounts in U.S. dollars; . if payments may be made, at Duke Energy's election or at the holder's election, in a currency other than that in which the Senior Notes are stated to be payable, then the currency in which those payments may be made, the terms and conditions of the election and the manner of determining those amounts; . the portion of the principal payable upon acceleration of maturity, if other than the entire principal; . whether the Senior Notes will be issuable as global securities and, if so, the securities depositary; . any changes in the events of default or covenants with respect to the Senior Notes; . any index or formula used for determining principal, premium or interest; . if the principal payable on the maturity date will not be determinable on one or more dates prior to the maturity date, the amount which will be deemed to be such principal amount or the manner of determining it; and . any other terms. 6 Unless Duke Energy states otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement, Duke Energy will issue the Senior Notes only in fully registered form without coupons, and there will be no service charge for any registration of transfer or exchange of the Senior Notes. Duke Energy may, however, require payment to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection with any transfer or exchange. Subject to the terms of the Senior Indenture and the limitations applicable to global securities, transfers and exchanges of the Senior Notes may be made at The Chase Manhattan Bank, 55 Water Street, New York, New York 10041 or at any other office or agency maintained by Duke Energy for such purpose. The Senior Notes will be issuable in denominations of $1,000 and any integral multiples of $1,000, unless Duke Energy states otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement. Duke Energy may offer and sell the Senior Notes, including original issue discount Senior Notes, at a substantial discount below their principal amount. The applicable prospectus supplement will describe special United States federal income tax and any other considerations applicable to those securities. In addition, the applicable prospectus supplement may describe certain special United States federal income tax or other considerations, if any, applicable to any Senior Notes that are denominated in a currency other than U.S. dollars. Global Securities Duke Energy may issue some or all of the Senior Notes as book-entry securities. Any such book-entry securities will be represented by one or more fully registered global securities. Duke Energy will register each global security with, or on behalf of, a securities depositary identified in the applicable prospectus supplement. Each global security will be deposited with the securities depositary or its nominee or a custodian for the securities depositary. As long as the securities depositary or its nominee is the registered holder of a global security representing Senior Notes, that person will be considered the sole owner and holder of the global security and the Senior Notes it represents for all purposes. Except in limited circumstances, owners of beneficial interests in a global security: . may not have the global security or any Senior Notes it represents registered in their names; . may not receive or be entitled to receive physical delivery of certificated Senior Notes in exchange for the global security; and . will not be considered the owners or holders of the global security or any Senior Notes it represents for any purposes under the Senior Notes or the Senior Indenture. Duke Energy will make all payments of principal and any premium and interest on a global security to the securities depositary or its nominee as the holder of the global security. The laws of some jurisdictions require that certain purchasers of securities take physical delivery of securities in definitive form. These laws may impair the ability to transfer beneficial interests in a global security. Ownership of beneficial interests in a global security will be limited to institutions having accounts with the securities depositary or its nominee, which are called "participants" in this discussion, and to persons that hold beneficial interests through participants. When a global security representing Senior Notes is issued, the securities depositary will credit on its book entry, registration 7 and transfer system the principal amounts of Senior Notes the global security represents to the accounts of its participants. Ownership of beneficial interests in a global security will be shown only on, and the transfer of those ownership interests will be effected only through, records maintained by: . the securities depositary, with respect to participants' interests; and . any participant, with respect to interests the participant holds on behalf of other persons. Payments participants make to owners of beneficial interests held through those participants will be the responsibility of those participants. The securities depositary may from time to time adopt various policies and procedures governing payments, transfers, exchanges and other matters relating to beneficial interests in a global security. None of the following will have any responsibility or liability for any aspect of the securities depositary's or any participant's records relating to beneficial interests in a global security representing Senior Notes, for payments made on account of those beneficial interests or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to those beneficial interests: . Duke Energy; . the Senior Indenture Trustee; or . an agent of either of them. Redemption Provisions relating to the redemption of Senior Notes will be set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement. Unless Duke Energy states otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement, Duke Energy may redeem Senior Notes only upon notice mailed at least 30 but not more than 60 days before the date fixed for redemption. Unless Duke Energy states otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement, that notice may state that the redemption will be conditional upon the Senior Indenture Trustee, or the applicable paying agent, receiving sufficient funds to pay the principal, premium and interest on those Senior Notes on the date fixed for redemption and that if the Senior Indenture Trustee or the applicable paying agent does not receive those funds, the redemption notice will not apply, and Duke Energy will not be required to redeem those Senior Notes. Duke Energy will not be required to: . issue, register the transfer of, or exchange any Senior Notes of a series during the period beginning 15 days before the date the notice is mailed identifying the Senior Notes of that series that have been selected for redemption; or . register the transfer of or exchange any Senior Note of that series selected for redemption except the unredeemed portion of a Senior Note being partially redeemed. Consolidation, Merger, Conveyance or Transfer The Senior Indenture provides that Duke Energy may consolidate or merge with or into, or convey or transfer all or substantially all of its properties and assets to, another corporation or other entity. Any successor must, however, assume Duke Energy's obligations under the Senior Indenture and the Senior Notes issued under it, and Duke Energy must deliver to the Senior Indenture Trustee a statement by certain of its officers and an opinion of counsel that affirm compliance with all 8 conditions in the Senior Indenture relating to the transaction. When those conditions are satisfied, the successor will succeed to and be substituted for Duke Energy under the Senior Indenture, and Duke Energy will be relieved of its obligations under the Senior Indenture and the Senior Notes. Modification; Waiver Duke Energy may modify the Senior Indenture with the consent of the holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Senior Notes of all series of Senior Notes that are affected by the modification, voting as one class. The consent of the holder of each outstanding Senior Note affected is, however, required to: . change the maturity date of the principal or any installment of principal or interest on that Senior Note; . reduce the principal amount, the interest rate or any premium payable upon redemption on that Senior Note; . reduce the amount of principal due and payable upon acceleration of maturity; . change the currency of payment of principal, premium or interest on that Senior Note; . impair the right to institute suit to enforce any such payment on or after the maturity date or redemption date; . reduce the percentage in principal amount of Senior Notes of any series required to modify the Senior Indenture, waive compliance with certain restrictive provisions of the Senior Indenture or waive certain defaults; or . with certain exceptions, modify the provisions of the Senior Indenture governing modifications of the Senior Indenture or governing waiver of covenants or past defaults. In addition, Duke Energy may modify the Senior Indenture for certain other purposes, without the consent of any holders of Senior Notes. The holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Senior Notes of any series may waive, for that series, Duke Energy's compliance with certain restrictive provisions of the Senior Indenture, including the covenant described under "Negative Pledge." The holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Senior Notes of all series under the Senior Indenture with respect to which a default has occurred and is continuing, voting as one class, may waive that default for all those series, except a default in the payment of principal or any premium or interest on any Senior Note or a default with respect to a covenant or provision which cannot be modified without the consent of the holder of each outstanding Senior Note of the series affected. Events of Default The following are events of default under the Senior Indenture with respect to any series of Senior Notes, unless Duke Energy states otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement: . failure to pay principal of or any premium on any Senior Note of that series when due; . failure to pay when due any interest on any Senior Note of that series that continues for 60 days; for this purpose, the date on which interest is due is the date on which Duke Energy is required to make payment following any deferral of interest payments by it under the terms of Senior Notes that permit such deferrals; 9 . failure to make any sinking fund payment when required for any Senior Note of that series that continues for 60 days; . failure to perform any covenant in the Senior Indenture (other than a covenant expressly included solely for the benefit of other series) that continues for 90 days after the Senior Indenture Trustee or the holders of at least 33% of the outstanding Senior Notes of that series give Duke Energy written notice of the default; and . certain bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization events with respect to Duke Energy. In the case of the fourth event of default listed above, the Senior Indenture Trustee may extend the grace period. In addition, if holders of a particular series have given a notice of default, then holders of at least the same percentage of Senior Notes of that series, together with the Senior Indenture Trustee, may also extend the grace period. The grace period will be automatically extended if Duke Energy has initiated and is diligently pursuing corrective action. Duke Energy may establish additional events of default for a particular series and, if established, any such events of default will be described in the applicable prospectus supplement. If an event of default with respect to Senior Notes of a series occurs and is continuing, then the Senior Indenture Trustee or the holders of at least 33% in principal amount of the outstanding Senior Notes of that series may declare the principal amount of all Senior Notes of that series to be immediately due and payable. However, that event of default will be considered waived at any time after the declaration but before a judgment for payment of the money due has been obtained if: . Duke Energy has paid or deposited with the Senior Indenture Trustee all overdue interest, the principal and any premium due otherwise than by the declaration and any interest on such amounts, and any interest on overdue interest, to the extent legally permitted, in each case with respect to that series, and all amounts due to the Senior Indenture Trustee; and . all events of default with respect to that series, other than the nonpayment of the principal that became due solely by virtue of the declaration, have been cured or waived. The Senior Indenture Trustee is under no obligation to exercise any of its rights or powers at the request or direction of any holders of Senior Notes unless those holders have offered the Senior Indenture Trustee security or indemnity against the costs, expenses and liabilities which it might incur as a result. The holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Senior Notes of any series have, with certain exceptions, the right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceedings for any remedy available to the Senior Indenture Trustee or the exercise of any power of the Senior Indenture Trustee with respect to those Senior Notes. The Senior Indenture Trustee may withhold notice of any default, except a default in the payment of principal or interest, from the holders of any series if the Senior Indenture Trustee in good faith considers it in the interest of the holders to do so. The holder of any Senior Note will have an absolute and unconditional right to receive payment of the principal, any premium and, within certain limitations, any interest on that Senior Note on its maturity date or redemption date and to enforce those payments. 10 Duke Energy is required to furnish each year to the Senior Indenture Trustee a statement by certain of its officers to the effect that it is not in default under the Senior Indenture or, if there has been a default, specifying the default and its status. Payments; Paying Agent The paying agent will pay the principal of any Senior Notes only if those Senior Notes are surrendered to it. The paying agent will pay interest on Senior Notes issued as global securities by wire transfer to the holder of those global securities. Unless Duke Energy states otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement, the paying agent will pay interest on Senior Notes that are not in global form at its office or, at Duke Energy's option: . by wire transfer to an account at a banking institution in the United States that is designated in writing to the Senior Indenture Trustee at least 16 days prior to the date of payment by the person entitled to that interest; or . by check mailed to the address of the person entitled to that interest as that address appears in the security register for those Senior Notes. Unless Duke Energy states otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement, the Senior Indenture Trustee will act as paying agent for that series of Senior Notes, and the principal corporate trust office of the Senior Indenture Trustee will be the office through which the paying agent acts. Duke Energy may, however, change or add paying agents or approve a change in the office through which a paying agent acts. Any money that Duke Energy has paid to a paying agent for principal or interest on any Senior Notes which remains unclaimed at the end of two years after that principal or interest has become due will be repaid to Duke Energy at its request. After repayment to Duke Energy, holders should look only to Duke Energy for those payments. Negative Pledge While any of the Senior Notes remain outstanding, Duke Energy will not create, or permit to be created or to exist, any mortgage, lien, pledge, security interest or other encumbrance upon any of its property, whether owned on or acquired after the date of the Senior Indenture, to secure any indebtedness for borrowed money of Duke Energy, unless the Senior Notes then outstanding are equally and ratably secured for so long as any such indebtedness is so secured. The foregoing restriction does not apply with respect to, among other things: . purchase money mortgages, or other purchase money liens, pledges, security interests or encumbrances upon property that Duke Energy acquired after the date of the Senior Indenture; . mortgages, liens, pledges, security interests or other encumbrances existing on any property at the time Duke Energy acquired it, including those which exist on any property of an entity with which Duke Energy is consolidated or merged or which transfers or leases all or substantially all of its properties to Duke Energy; . mortgages, liens, pledges, security interests or other encumbrances upon any property of Duke Energy that existed on the date of the initial issuance of the Senior Notes; 11 . pledges or deposits to secure performance in connection with bids, tenders, contracts (other than contracts for the payment of money) or leases to which Duke Energy is a party; . liens created by or resulting from any litigation or proceeding which at the time is being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings; . liens incurred in connection with the issuance of bankers' acceptances and lines of credit, bankers' liens or rights of offset and any security given in the ordinary course of business to banks or others to secure any indebtedness payable on demand or maturing within 12 months of the date that such indebtedness is originally incurred; . liens incurred in connection with repurchase, swap or other similar agreements (including commodity price, currency exchange and interest rate protection agreements); . liens securing industrial revenue or pollution control bonds; . liens, pledges, security interests or other encumbrances on any property arising in connection with any defeasance, covenant defeasance or in-substance defeasance of indebtedness of Duke Energy; . liens created in connection with, and created to secure, a non- recourse obligation; . Bonds issued or to be issued from time to time under Duke Energy's First and Refunding Mortgage, and the "permitted liens" specified in Duke Energy's First and Refunding Mortgage; . indebtedness which Duke Energy may issue in connection with its consolidation or merger with or into any other entity, which may be its affiliate, in exchange for or otherwise in substitution for secured indebtedness of that entity ("Third Party Debt") which by its terms (1) is secured by a mortgage on all or a portion of the property of that entity, (2) prohibits that entity from incurring secured indebtedness, unless the Third Party Debt is secured equally and ratably with such secured indebtedness or (3) prohibits that entity from incurring secured indebtedness; . indebtedness of any entity which Duke Energy is required to assume in connection with a consolidation or merger of that entity, with respect to which any property of Duke Energy is subjected to a mortgage, lien, pledge, security interest or other encumbrance; . mortgages, liens, pledges, security interests or other encumbrances upon any property that Duke Energy acquired, constructed, developed or improved after the date of the Senior Indenture which are created before, at the time of, or within 18 months after such acquisition--or in the case of property constructed, developed or improved, after the completion of the construction, development or improvement and commencement of full commercial operation of that property, whichever is later--to secure or provide for the payment of any part of its purchase price or cost; provided that, in the case of such construction, development or improvement, the mortgages, liens, pledges, security interests or other encumbrances shall not apply to any property that Duke Energy owns other than real property that is unimproved up to that time; and . the replacement, extension or renewal of any mortgage, lien, pledge, security interest or other encumbrance described above; or the replacement, extension or renewal (not exceeding the principal amount of indebtedness so secured together with any premium, 12 interest, fee or expense payable in connection with any such replacement, extension or renewal) of the indebtedness so secured; provided that such replacement, extension or renewal is limited to all or a part of the same property that secured the mortgage, lien, pledge, security interest or other encumbrance replaced, extended or renewed, plus improvements on it or additions or accessions to it. In addition, Duke Energy may create or assume any other mortgage, lien, pledge, security interest or other encumbrance not excepted in the Senior Indenture without equally and ratably securing the Senior Notes, if immediately after that creation or assumption, the principal amount of indebtedness for borrowed money of Duke Energy that all such other mortgages, liens, pledges, security interests and other encumbrances secure does not exceed an amount equal to 10% of Duke Energy's common stockholders' equity as shown on its consolidated balance sheet for the accounting period occurring immediately before the creation or assumption of that mortgage, lien, pledge, security interest or other encumbrance. Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance The Senior Indenture provides that Duke Energy may be: . discharged from its obligations, with certain limited exceptions, with respect to any series of Senior Notes, as described in the Senior Indenture, such a discharge being called a "defeasance" in this prospectus; and . released from its obligations under certain restrictive covenants especially established with respect to any series of Senior Notes, including the covenant described under "Negative Pledge," as described in the Senior Indenture, such a release being called a "covenant defeasance" in this prospectus. Duke Energy must satisfy certain conditions to effect a defeasance or covenant defeasance. Those conditions include the irrevocable deposit with the Senior Indenture Trustee, in trust, of money or government obligations which through their scheduled payments of principal and interest would provide sufficient money to pay the principal and any premium and interest on those Senior Notes on the maturity dates of those payments or upon redemption. Following a defeasance, payment of the Senior Notes defeased may not be accelerated because of an event of default under the Senior Indenture. Following a covenant defeasance, the payment of Senior Notes may not be accelerated by reference to the covenants from which Duke Energy has been released. A defeasance may occur after a covenant defeasance. Under current United States federal income tax laws, a defeasance would be treated as an exchange of the relevant Senior Notes in which holders of those Senior Notes might recognize gain or loss. In addition, the amount, timing and character of amounts that holders would thereafter be required to include in income might be different from that which would be includible in the absence of that defeasance. Duke Energy urges investors to consult their own tax advisors as to the specific consequences of a defeasance, including the applicability and effect of tax laws other than United States federal income tax laws. Under current United States federal income tax law, unless accompanied by other changes in the terms of the Senior Notes, a covenant defeasance should not be treated as a taxable exchange. 13 Concerning the Senior Indenture Trustee The Chase Manhattan Bank is the Senior Indenture Trustee and is also the trustee under Duke Energy's Subordinated Indenture and the trustee under Duke Energy's First and Refunding Mortgage. Duke Energy and certain of its affiliates maintain deposit accounts and banking relationships with The Chase Manhattan Bank. The Chase Manhattan Bank also serves as trustee under other indentures pursuant to which securities of Duke Energy and of certain of its affiliates are outstanding. The Senior Indenture Trustee will perform only those duties that are specifically set forth in the Senior Indenture unless an event of default under the Senior Indenture occurs and is continuing. In case an event of default occurs and is continuing, the Senior Indenture Trustee will exercise the same degree of care as a prudent individual would exercise in the conduct of his or her own affairs. 14 DESCRIPTION OF THE JUNIOR SUBORDINATED NOTES Duke Energy will issue the Junior Subordinated Notes in one or more series under its Subordinated Indenture dated as of December 1, 1997 between Duke Energy and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee, as supplemented from time to time. The Subordinated Indenture is an exhibit to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part. The Junior Subordinated Notes are unsecured obligations of Duke Energy and are junior in right of payment to "Senior Indebtedness" of Duke Energy. You may find a description of the subordination provisions of the Junior Subordinated Notes, including a description of Senior Indebtedness of Duke Energy, under "Subordination." Duke Energy conducts its non-electric operations, and certain of its electric operations outside its service area in the Carolinas, through subsidiaries. Accordingly, its ability to meet its obligations under the Junior Subordinated Notes is partly dependent on the earnings and cash flows of those subsidiaries and the ability of those subsidiaries to pay dividends or to advance or repay funds to Duke Energy. In addition, the rights that Duke Energy and its creditors would have to participate in the assets of any such subsidiary upon the subsidiary's liquidation or recapitalization will be subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary's creditors. Certain of Duke Energy's subsidiaries have incurred substantial amounts of debt in the expansion of their businesses and Duke Energy anticipates that certain of its subsidiaries will do so in the future. The following description of the Junior Subordinated Notes is only a summary and is not intended to be comprehensive. For additional information you should refer to the Subordinated Indenture. General The Subordinated Indenture does not limit the amount of Subordinated Notes, including Junior Subordinated Notes, that Duke Energy may issue under it. Duke Energy may issue Subordinated Notes, including Junior Subordinated Notes, from time to time under the Subordinated Indenture in one or more series by entering into supplemental indentures or by its Board of Directors or a duly authorized committee authorizing the issuance. Two forms of supplemental indenture to the Subordinated Indenture (one with respect to Junior Subordinated Notes initially issued to a Trust and the other with respect to Junior Subordinated Notes initially issued to the public) are exhibits to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part. The Junior Subordinated Notes of a series need not be issued at the same time, bear interest at the same rate or mature on the same date. The Subordinated Indenture does not protect the holders of Junior Subordinated Notes if Duke Energy engages in a highly leveraged transaction. Provisions Applicable to Particular Series The prospectus supplement for a particular series of Junior Subordinated Notes being offered will disclose the specific terms related to the offering, including the price or prices at which the Junior Subordinated Notes to be offered will be issued. Those terms will include some or all of the following: . the title of the series; 15 . the total principal amount of the Junior Subordinated Notes of the series; . the date or dates on which principal is payable or the method for determining the date or dates, and any right that Duke Energy has to change the date on which principal is payable; . the interest rate or rates, if any, or the method for determining the rate or rates, and the date or dates from which interest will accrue; . any interest payment dates and the regular record date for the interest payable on each interest payment date, if any; . whether Duke Energy may extend the interest payment periods and, if so, the terms of the extension; . the place or places where payments will be made; . whether Duke Energy has the option to redeem the Junior Subordinated Notes and, if so, the terms of its redemption option; . any obligation that Duke Energy has to redeem the Junior Subordinated Notes through a sinking fund or to purchase the Junior Subordinated Notes through a purchase fund or at the option of the holder; . whether the provisions described under "Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance" will not apply to the Junior Subordinated Notes; . the currency in which payments will be made if other than U.S. dollars, and the manner of determining the equivalent of those amounts in U.S. dollars; . if payments may be made, at Duke Energy's election or at the holder's election, in a currency other than that in which the Junior Subordinated Notes are stated to be payable, then the currency in which those payments may be made, the terms and conditions of the election and the manner of determining those amounts; . the portion of the principal payable upon acceleration of maturity, if other than the entire principal; . whether the Junior Subordinated Notes will be issuable as global securities and, if so, the securities depositary; . any changes in the events of default or covenants with respect to the Junior Subordinated Notes; . any index or formula used for determining principal, premium or interest; . if the principal payable on the maturity date will not be determinable on one or more dates prior to the maturity date, the amount which will be deemed to be such principal amount or the manner of determining it; . the subordination of the Junior Subordinated Notes to any other of Duke Energy's indebtedness, including other series of Subordinated Notes; and . any other terms. The interest rate and interest and other payment dates of each series of Junior Subordinated Notes issued to a Trust will correspond to the rate at which distributions will be paid and the distribution and other payment dates of the Preferred Securities of that Trust. Unless Duke Energy states otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement, Duke Energy will issue the Junior Subordinated Notes only in fully registered form without coupons, and there will 16 be no service charge for any registration of transfer or exchange of the Junior Subordinated Notes. Duke Energy may, however, require payment to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection with any transfer or exchange. Subject to the terms of the Subordinated Indenture and the Limitations applicable to global securities, transfers and exchanges of the Junior Subordinated Notes may be made at The Chase Manhattan Bank, 55 Water Street, New York, New York 10041or at any other office maintained by Duke Energy for such purpose. The Junior Subordinated Notes will be issuable in denominations of $1,000 and any integral multiples of $1,000, unless Duke Energy states otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement. Duke Energy may offer and sell the Junior Subordinated Notes, including original issue discount Junior Subordinated Notes, at a substantial discount below their principal amount. The applicable prospectus supplement will describe special United States federal income tax and any other considerations applicable to those securities. In addition, the applicable prospectus supplement may describe certain special United States federal income tax or other considerations, if any, applicable to any Junior Subordinated Notes that are denominated in a currency other than U.S. dollars. Global Securities Duke Energy may issue some or all of the Junior Subordinated Notes as book-entry securities. Any such book-entry securities will be represented by one or more fully registered global securities. Duke Energy will register each global security with or on behalf of a securities depositary identified in the applicable prospectus supplement. Each global security will be deposited with the securities depositary or its nominee or a custodian for the securities depositary. As long as the securities depositary or its nominee is the registered holder of a global security representing Junior Subordinated Notes, that person will be considered the sole owner and holder of the global security and the Junior Subordinated Notes it represents for all purposes. Except in limited circumstances, owners of beneficial interests in a global security: . may not have the global security or any Junior Subordinated Notes it represents registered in their names; . may not receive or be entitled to receive physical delivery of certificated Junior Subordinated Notes in exchange for the global security; and . will not be considered the owners or holders of the global security or any Junior Subordinated Notes it represents for any purposes under the Junior Subordinated Notes or the Subordinated Indenture. Duke Energy will make all payments of principal and any premium and interest on a global security to the securities depositary or its nominee as the holder of the global security. The laws of some jurisdictions require that certain purchasers of securities take physical delivery of securities in definitive form. These laws may impair the ability to transfer beneficial interests in a global security. Ownership of beneficial interests in a global security will be limited to institutions having accounts with the securities depositary or its nominee, which are called "participants" in this discussion, and to persons that hold beneficial interests through participants. When a global security representing 17 Junior Subordinated Notes is issued, the securities depositary will credit on its book-entry, registration and transfer system the principal amounts of Junior Subordinated Notes the global security represents to the accounts of its participants. Ownership of beneficial interests in a global security will be shown only on, and the transfer of those ownership interests will be effected only through, records maintained by: . the securities depositary, with respect to participants' interests; and . any participant, with respect to interests the participant holds on behalf of other persons. Payments participants make to owners of beneficial interests held through those participants will be the responsibility of those participants. The securities depositary may from time to time adopt various policies and procedures governing payments, transfers, exchanges and other matters relating to beneficial interests in a global security. None of the following will have any responsibility or liability for any aspect of the securities depositary's or any participant's records relating to beneficial interests in a global security representing Junior Subordinated Notes, for payments made on account of those beneficial interests or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to those beneficial interests: . Duke Energy; . the Subordinated Indenture Trustee; . the Trust (if the Junior Subordinated Notes are issued to a Trust); or . any agent of any of them. Redemption Provisions relating to the redemption of Junior Subordinated Notes will be set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement. Unless Duke Energy states otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement, Duke Energy may redeem Junior Subordinated Notes only upon notice mailed at least 30 but not more than 60 days before the date fixed for redemption. Duke Energy will not be required to: . issue, register the transfer of, or exchange any Junior Subordinated Notes of a series during the period beginning 15 days before the date the notice is mailed identifying the Junior Subordinated Notes of that series that have been selected for redemption; or . register the transfer of or exchange any Junior Subordinated Note of that series selected for redemption except the unredeemed portion of a Junior Subordinated Note being partially redeemed. Consolidation, Merger, Conveyance or Transfer The Subordinated Indenture provides that Duke Energy may consolidate or merge with or into, or convey or transfer all or substantially all of its properties and assets to, another corporation or other entity. Any successor must, however, assume Duke Energy's obligations under the Subordinated Indenture and the Subordinated Notes, including the Junior Subordinated Notes, and Duke Energy must deliver to the Subordinated Indenture Trustee a statement by certain of its officers and an opinion of counsel that affirm compliance with all conditions in the Subordinated Indenture relating to the transaction. When those conditions are satisfied, the successor will succeed to and be 18 substituted for Duke Energy under the Subordinated Indenture, and Duke Energy will be relieved of its obligations under the Subordinated Indenture and any Subordinated Notes, including the Junior Subordinated Notes. Modification; Waiver Duke Energy may modify the Subordinated Indenture with the consent of the holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Subordinated Notes of all series that are affected by the modification, voting as one class. The consent of the holder of each outstanding Subordinated Note affected is, however, required to: . change the maturity date of the principal or any installment of principal or interest on that Subordinated Note; . reduce the principal amount, the interest rate or any premium payable upon redemption on that Subordinated Note; . reduce the amount of principal due and payable upon acceleration of maturity; . change the currency of payment of principal, premium or interest on that Subordinated Note; . impair the right to institute suit to enforce any such payment on or after the maturity date or redemption date; . reduce the percentage in principal amount of Subordinated Notes of any series required to modify the Subordinated Indenture, waive compliance with certain restrictive provisions of the Subordinated Indenture or waive certain defaults; or . with certain exceptions, modify the provisions of the Subordinated Indenture governing modifications of the Subordinated Indenture or governing waiver of covenants or past defaults. In addition, Duke Energy may modify the Subordinated Indenture for certain other purposes, without the consent of any holders of Subordinated Notes, including Junior Subordinated Notes. The holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Junior Subordinated Notes of any series may waive, for that series, Duke Energy's compliance with certain restrictive provisions of the Subordinated Indenture. The holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Subordinated Notes of all series under the Subordinated Indenture with respect to which a default has occurred and is continuing, voting as one class, may waive that default for all those series, except a default in the payment of principal or any premium or interest on any Subordinated Note or a default with respect to a covenant or provision which cannot be modified without the consent of the holder of each outstanding Subordinated Note of the series affected. Duke Energy may not amend the Subordinated Indenture to change the subordination of any outstanding Junior Subordinated Notes without the consent of each holder of Senior Indebtedness that the amendment would adversely affect. 19 Events of Default The following are events of default under the Subordinated Indenture with respect to any series of Junior Subordinated Notes, unless Duke Energy states otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement: . failure to pay principal of or any premium on any Junior Subordinated Note of that series when due; . failure to pay when due any interest on any Junior Subordinated Note of that series that continues for 60 days; for this purpose, the date on which interest is due is the date on which Duke Energy is required to make payment following any deferral of interest payments by it under the terms of Junior Subordinated Notes that permit such deferrals; . failure to make any sinking fund payment when required for any Junior Subordinated Note of that series that continues for 60 days; . failure to perform any covenant in the Subordinated Indenture (other than a covenant expressly included solely for the benefit of other series) that continues for 90 days after the Subordinated Indenture Trustee or the holders of at least 33% of the outstanding Junior Subordinated Notes of that series give Duke Energy written notice of the default; and . certain bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization events with respect to Duke Energy. In the case of the fourth event of default listed above, the Subordinated Indenture Trustee may extend the grace period. In addition, if holders of a particular series have given a notice of default, then holders of at least the same percentage of Junior Subordinated Notes of that series, together with the Subordinated Indenture Trustee, may also extend the grace period. The grace period will be automatically extended if Duke Energy has initiated and is diligently pursuing corrective action. Duke Energy may establish additional events of default for a particular series and, if established, any such events of default will be described in the applicable prospectus supplement. If an event of default with respect to Junior Subordinated Notes of a series occurs and is continuing, then the Subordinated Indenture Trustee or the holders of at least 33% in principal amount of the outstanding Junior Subordinated Notes of that series may declare the principal amount of all Junior Subordinated Notes of that series to be immediately due and payable. However, that event of default will be considered waived at any time after the declaration but before a judgment for payment of the money due has been obtained if: . Duke Energy has paid or deposited with the Subordinated Indenture Trustee all overdue interest, the principal and any premium due otherwise than by the declaration and any interest on such amounts, and any interest on overdue interest, to the extent legally permitted, in each case with respect to that series, and all amounts due to the Subordinated Indenture Trustee; and . all events of default with respect to that series, other than the nonpayment of the principal that became due solely by virtue of the declaration, have been cured or waived. In the case of Junior Subordinated Notes issued to a Trust, a holder of Preferred Securities may institute a legal proceeding directly against Duke Energy, without first instituting a legal 20 proceeding against the Property Trustee of the Trust by which those Preferred Securities were issued or any other person or entity, for enforcement of payment to that holder of principal or interest on an equivalent amount of Junior Subordinated Notes of the related series on or after the due dates specified in those Junior Subordinated Notes. The Subordinated Indenture Trustee is under no obligation to exercise any of its rights or powers at the request or direction of any holders of Junior Subordinated Notes unless those holders have offered the Subordinated Indenture Trustee security or indemnity against the costs, expenses and liabilities which it might incur as a result. The holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Junior Subordinated Notes of any series have, with certain exceptions, the right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceedings for any remedy available to the Subordinated Indenture Trustee or the exercise of any power of the Subordinated Indenture Trustee with respect to those Junior Subordinated Notes. The Subordinated Indenture Trustee may withhold notice of any default, except a default in the payment of principal or interest, from the holders of any series if the Subordinated Indenture Trustee in good faith considers it in the interest of the holders to do so. The holder of any Junior Subordinated Note will have an absolute and unconditional right to receive payment of the principal, any premium and, within certain limitations, any interest on that Junior Subordinated Note on its maturity date or redemption date and to enforce those payments. Duke Energy is required to furnish each year to the Subordinated Indenture Trustee a statement by certain of its officers to the effect that it is not in default under the Subordinated Indenture or, if there has been a default, specifying the default and its status. Payments; Paying Agent The paying agent will pay the principal of any Junior Subordinated Notes only if those Junior Subordinated Notes are surrendered to it. The paying agent will pay interest on Junior Subordinated Notes issued as global securities by wire transfer to the holder of those global securities. Unless Duke Energy states otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement, the paying agent will pay interest on Junior Subordinated Notes that are not in global form at its office or, at Duke Energy's option: . by wire transfer to an account at a banking institution in the United States that is designated in writing to the Subordinated Indenture Trustee at least 16 days prior to the date of payment by the person entitled to that interest; or . by check mailed to the address of the person entitled to that interest as that address appears in the security register for those Junior Subordinated Notes. Unless Duke Energy states otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement, the Subordinated Indenture Trustee will act as paying agent for that series of Junior Subordinated Notes, and the principal corporate trust office of the Subordinated Indenture Trustee will be the office through which the paying agent acts. Duke Energy may, however, change or add paying agents or approve a change in the office through which a paying agent acts. Any money that Duke Energy has paid to a paying agent for principal or interest on any Junior Subordinated Notes which remains unclaimed at the end of two years after that principal or 21 interest has become due will be repaid to Duke Energy at its request. After repayment to Duke Energy, holders should look only to Duke Energy for those payments. Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance The Subordinated Indenture provides that Duke Energy may be: . discharged from its obligations, with certain limited exceptions, with respect to any series of Junior Subordinated Notes, as described in the Subordinated Indenture, such a discharge being called a "defeasance" in this prospectus; and . released from its obligations under certain restrictive covenants especially established with respect to a series of Junior Subordinated Notes, as described in the Subordinated Indenture, such a release being called a "covenant defeasance" in this prospectus. Duke Energy must satisfy certain conditions to effect a defeasance or covenant defeasance. Those conditions include the irrevocable deposit with the Subordinated Indenture Trustee, in trust, of money or government obligations which through their scheduled payments of principal and interest would provide sufficient money to pay the principal and any premium and interest on those Junior Subordinated Notes on the maturity dates of those payments or upon redemption. Following a defeasance, payment of the Junior Subordinated Notes defeased may not be accelerated because of an event of default under the Subordinated Indenture. Under current United States federal income tax laws, a defeasance would be treated as an exchange of the relevant Junior Subordinated Notes in which holders of those Junior Subordinated Notes might recognize gain or loss. In addition, the amount, timing and character of amounts that holders would thereafter be required to include in income might be different from that which would be includible in the absence of that defeasance. Duke Energy urges investors to consult their own tax advisors as to the specific consequences of a defeasance, including the applicability and effect of tax laws other than United States federal income tax laws. Junior Subordinated Notes issued to a Trust will not be subject to covenant defeasance. Subordination Each series of Junior Subordinated Notes will be subordinate and junior in right of payment, to the extent set forth in the Subordinated Indenture, to all Senior Indebtedness as defined below. If: . Duke Energy makes a payment or distribution of any of its assets to creditors upon its dissolution, winding-up, liquidation or reorganization, whether in bankruptcy, insolvency or otherwise; . a default beyond any grace period has occurred and is continuing with respect to the payment of principal, interest or any other monetary amounts due and payable on any Senior Indebtedness; or . the maturity of any Senior Indebtedness has been accelerated because of a default on that Senior Indebtedness, then the holders of Senior Indebtedness generally will have the right to receive payment, in the case of the first instance, of all amounts due or to become due upon that Senior Indebtedness, and, in the case of the second 22 and third instances, of all amounts due on that Senior Indebtedness, or Duke Energy will make provision for those payments, before the holders of any Junior Subordinated Notes have the right to receive any payments of principal or interest on their Junior Subordinated Notes. "Senior Indebtedness" means, with respect to any series of Junior Subordinated Notes, the principal, premium, interest and any other payment in respect of any of the following: . all of Duke Energy's indebtedness that is evidenced by notes, debentures, bonds or other securities Duke Energy sells for money or other obligations for money borrowed; . all indebtedness of others of the kinds described in the preceding category which Duke Energy has assumed or guaranteed or which Duke Energy has in effect guaranteed through an agreement to purchase, contingent or otherwise; and . all renewals, extensions or refundings of indebtedness of the kinds described in either of the preceding two categories. Any such indebtedness, renewal, extension or refunding, however, will not be Senior Indebtedness if the instrument creating or evidencing it or the assumption or guarantee of it provides that it is not superior in right of payment to or is equal in right of payment with those Junior Subordinated Notes. Senior Indebtedness will be entitled to the benefits of the subordination provisions in the Subordinated Indenture irrespective of the amendment, modification or waiver of any term of the Senior Indebtedness. Future series of Subordinated Notes which are not Junior Subordinated Notes may rank senior to outstanding series of Junior Subordinated Notes and would constitute Senior Indebtedness with respect to those series. The Subordinated Indenture does not limit the amount of Senior Indebtedness that Duke Energy may issue. As of September 30, 2000, Duke Energy's Senior Indebtedness totaled approximately $4,000,000,000. Concerning the Subordinated Indenture Trustee The Chase Manhattan Bank is the Subordinated Indenture Trustee and is also the Senior Indenture Trustee and the trustee under Duke Energy's First and Refunding Mortgage. Duke Energy and certain of its affiliates maintain deposit accounts and banking relationships with The Chase Manhattan Bank. The Chase Manhattan Bank also serves as trustee under other indentures pursuant to which securities of Duke Energy and of certain of its affiliates are outstanding. The Subordinated Indenture Trustee will perform only those duties that are specifically set forth in the Subordinated Indenture unless an event of default under the Subordinated Indenture occurs and is continuing. In case an event of default occurs and is continuing, the Subordinated Indenture Trustee will exercise the same degree of care as a prudent individual would exercise in the conduct of his or her own affairs. 23 DESCRIPTION OF THE FIRST AND REFUNDING MORTGAGE BONDS Duke Energy will issue the First and Refunding Mortgage Bonds in one or more series under its First and Refunding Mortgage, dated as of December 1, 1927, to The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee, as supplemented and amended. The First and Refunding Mortgage is sometimes called the "Mortgage" and the First and Refunding Mortgage Bonds are sometimes called the "Bonds" in this prospectus. The trustee under the Mortgage is sometimes called the "Bond Trustee" in this prospectus. The Mortgage is an exhibit to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part. The following description of the Bonds is only a summary and is not intended to be comprehensive. For additional information you should refer to the Mortgage. General The amount of Bonds which Duke Energy may issue under the Mortgage is unlimited. Duke Energy's Board of Directors will determine the terms of each series of Bonds, including denominations, maturity, interest rate and payment terms and whether the series will have redemption or sinking fund provisions. Unless Duke Energy states otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement, Duke Energy will issue the Bonds only in fully registered form without coupons and there will be no service charge for any transfers and exchanges of the Bonds. Duke Energy may, however, require payment to cover any stamp tax or other governmental charge payable in connection with any transfer or exchange. Transfers and exchanges of the Bonds may be made at The Chase Manhattan Bank, 55 Water Street, New York, New York 10041 or at any other office maintained by Duke Energy for such purpose. The Bonds will be issuable in denominations of $1,000 and multiples of $1,000, unless Duke Energy states otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement. The Bonds will be exchangeable for an equivalent principal amount of Bonds of other authorized denominations of the same series. The prospectus supplement for a particular series of Bonds will describe the maturity, interest rate and payment terms of those Bonds and any relevant redemption or sinking fund provisions. Security The Mortgage creates a continuing lien to secure the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds. All the Bonds are equally and ratably secured without preference, priority or distinction. The lien of the Mortgage covers substantially all of Duke Energy's properties, real, personal and mixed, and Duke Energy's franchises, including properties acquired after the date of the Mortgage, with certain exceptions. Those exceptions include cash, accounts receivable, inventories of materials and supplies, merchandise held for sale, securities that Duke Energy holds, certain after-acquired property not useful in Duke Energy's electric business, certain after-acquired franchises and certain after-acquired non-electric properties. The lien of the Mortgage is subject to certain permitted liens and to liens that exist upon properties that Duke Energy acquired after it entered into the Mortgage to the extent of the amounts of prior lien bonds secured by those properties (not, however, exceeding 75% of the cost or value of those properties) and additions to those properties. "Prior lien bonds" are bonds or other 24 indebtedness that are secured at the time of acquisition by a lien upon property that Duke Energy acquires after the date of the Mortgage that becomes subject to the lien of the Mortgage. Issuance of Additional Bonds If Duke Energy satisfies the conditions in the Mortgage, the Bond Trustee may authenticate and deliver additional Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding: . the amount of cash that Duke Energy has deposited with the Bond Trustee for that purpose; . the amount of previously authenticated and delivered Bonds or refundable prior lien bonds that have been or are to be retired which, with certain exceptions, Duke Energy has deposited with the Bond Trustee for that purpose; or . 66 2/3% of the aggregate of the net amounts of additional property (electric) certified to the Bond Trustee after February 18, 1949. The Bond Trustee may not authenticate and deliver any additional Bonds under the Mortgage, other than certain types of refunding Bonds, unless Duke Energy's available net earnings for twelve consecutive calendar months within the immediately preceding fifteen calendar months have been at least twice the amount of the annual interest charges on all Bonds outstanding under the Mortgage, including the Bonds proposed to be issued, and on all outstanding prior lien bonds that the Bond Trustee does not hold under the Mortgage. Duke Energy may not apply to the Bond Trustee to authenticate and deliver any Bonds (1) in an aggregate principal amount exceeding $26,000,000 on the basis of additional property (electric) that Duke Energy acquired or constructed prior to January 1, 1949 or (2) on the basis of Bonds or prior lien bonds paid, purchased or redeemed prior to February 1, 1949. Duke Energy may not certify any additional property (electric) which is subject to the lien of any prior lien bonds for the purpose of establishing those prior lien bonds as refundable if the aggregate principal amount of those prior lien bonds exceeds 66 2/3% of the net amount of the additional property that is subject to the lien of such prior lien bonds. Release Provisions The Mortgage permits Duke Energy to dispose of certain property and to take other actions without the Bond Trustee releasing that property. The Mortgage also permits the release of mortgaged property if Duke Energy deposits cash or other consideration equal to the value of the mortgaged property to be released. In certain events and within certain limitations, the Bond Trustee is required to pay out cash that the Bond Trustee receives--other than for the Replacement Fund or as the basis for issuing Bonds--upon Duke Energy's application. Duke Energy may withdraw cash that it deposited with the Bond Trustee as the basis for issuing Bonds in an amount equal to the principal amount of any Bonds that it is entitled to have authenticated and delivered on the basis of additional property (electric), on the basis of Bonds previously authenticated and delivered or on the basis of refundable prior lien bonds. 25 Replacement Fund The Mortgage requires Duke Energy to deposit with the Bond Trustee annually, for the Replacement Fund established under the Mortgage, the sum of the "replacement requirements" for all years beginning with 1949 and ending with the last calendar year preceding the deposit date, less certain deductions. Those deductions are (1) the aggregate original cost of all fixed property (electric) retired during that time period, not exceeding the aggregate of the gross amounts of additional property (electric) that Duke Energy acquired or constructed during the same period, and (2) the aggregate amount of cash that Duke Energy deposited with the Bond Trustee up to that time, or that Duke Energy would have been required to deposit except for permitted reductions, under the Replacement Fund. The "replacement requirement" for any year is 2 1/2% of the average "amount of depreciable fixed property" (electric) owned by Duke Energy at the beginning and end of that year, not exceeding, however, the amount Duke Energy is permitted to charge as an operating expense for depreciation or retirement by any governmental authority, or the amount deductible as depreciation or similar expense for federal income tax purposes. The "amount of depreciable fixed property" (electric) is the amount by which the sum of $192,913,385 plus the aggregate gross amount of all depreciable additional property (electric) that Duke Energy acquired or constructed from January 1, 1949 to the date as of which such amount is determined exceeds the original cost of all of Duke Energy's depreciable fixed property (electric) retired during that period or released from the lien of the Mortgage. Duke Energy may reduce the amount of cash at any time required to be deposited in the Replacement Fund and may withdraw any cash that it previously deposited that is held in the Replacement Fund: . in an amount equal to 150% of the principal amount of Bonds previously authenticated and delivered under the Mortgage, or refundable prior lien bonds, deposited with the Bond Trustee and on the basis of which Duke Energy would otherwise have been entitled to have additional Bonds authenticated and delivered; and . in an amount equal to 150% of the principal amount of Bonds which Duke Energy would otherwise be entitled to have authenticated and delivered on the basis of additional property (electric). Upon Duke Energy's application, the Bond Trustee will apply cash that Duke Energy deposited in the Replacement Fund and has not previously withdrawn to the payment, purchase or redemption of Bonds issued under the Mortgage or to the purchase of refundable prior lien bonds. Duke Energy has never deposited any cash with the Bond Trustee for the Replacement Fund. If Duke Energy deposits any cash in the future, it has agreed not to apply that cash to the redemption of the Bonds as long as any Bonds then outstanding remain outstanding. Amendments of the Mortgage Duke Energy may amend the Mortgage with the consent of the holders of 66 2/3% in principal amount of the Bonds, except that no such amendment may: . affect the terms of payment of principal at maturity or of interest or premium on any Bond; 26 . affect the rights of Bondholders to sue to enforce any such payment at maturity; or . reduce the percentage of Bonds required to consent to an amendment. No amendment may affect the rights under the Mortgage of the holders of less than all of the series of Bonds outstanding unless the holders of 66 2/3% in principal amount of the Bonds of each series affected consent to the amendment. The covenants included in the supplemental indenture for any series of Bonds to be issued will be solely for the benefit of the holders of those Bonds. Duke Energy may modify any such covenant only with the consent of the holders of 66 2/3% in principal amount of those Bonds outstanding, without the consent of Bondholders of any other series. Events of Default The Bond Trustee may, and at the written request of the holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Bonds will, declare the principal of all outstanding Bonds due when any event of default under the Mortgage occurs. The holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Bonds may, however, waive the default and rescind the declaration if Duke Energy cures the default. Events of default under the Mortgage include: . default in the payment of principal; . default for 60 days in the payment of interest; . default in the performance of any other covenant in the Mortgage continuing for 60 days after the Bond Trustee or the holders of not less than 10% in principal amount of the Bonds then outstanding give notice of the default; and . certain bankruptcy or insolvency events with respect to Duke Energy. Duke Energy provides a statement by certain of its officers each year to the Bond Trustee stating whether it has complied with the covenants of the Mortgage. Concerning the Bond Trustee The Chase Manhattan Bank is the Bond Trustee and is also the Senior Indenture Trustee and the Subordinated Indenture Trustee. Duke Energy and certain of its affiliates maintain deposit accounts and banking relationships with The Chase Manhattan Bank. The Chase Manhattan Bank also serves as trustee under other indentures pursuant to which securities of Duke Energy and of certain of its affiliates are outstanding. The Bond Trustee is under no obligation to exercise any of its powers at the request of any of the holders of the Bonds unless those Bondholders have offered to the Bond Trustee security or indemnity satisfactory to it against the cost, expenses and liabilities it might incur as a result. The holders of a majority in principal amount of the Bonds outstanding may direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to the Bond Trustee, or the exercise of any trust or power of the Bond Trustee. The Bond Trustee will not be liable for any action that it takes or omits to take in good faith in accordance with any such direction. 27 DESCRIPTION OF THE COMMON STOCK The following description of Duke Energy's Common Stock is only a summary and is not intended to be comprehensive. For additional information you should refer to the applicable provisions of the North Carolina Business Corporation Act and Duke Energy's Restated Articles of Incorporation (Articles) and By- Laws. The Articles and By-Laws are exhibits to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part. General Duke Energy is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock. At September 30, 2000, 368,604,491 shares of Common Stock were outstanding. Duke Energy is also authorized to issue up to 12,500,000 shares of Preferred Stock, 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock A and 1,500,000 shares of Preference Stock. At September 30, 2000, 2,414,984 shares of Preferred Stock, 2,057,185 shares of Preferred Stock A and no shares of Preference Stock were outstanding. The Preferred Stock, Preferred Stock A and Preference Stock together are sometimes called the "Preferred Stocks." Dividends Holders of Common Stock are entitled to such dividends as may be declared from time to time by the Board of Directors from legally available funds but only if full dividends on all outstanding series of the Preferred Stocks for the then current and all prior dividend periods and any required sinking fund payments with respect to any outstanding series of such securities have been paid or provided for. Voting Rights Subject to the rights, if any, of the holders of the Preferred Stocks which may be outstanding or as otherwise provided by law, the holders of Common Stock have exclusive voting rights, each share being entitled to one vote. Holders of Common Stock have noncumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of more than 50% of the shares voting for the election of directors can elect 100% of the directors and the holders of the remaining shares voting for the election of directors will not be able to elect any directors. Whenever dividends on any part of any outstanding Preferred Stock or Preferred Stock A are in arrears in an amount equivalent to the total dividends required to be paid on that Preferred Stock or Preferred Stock A in any period of 12 calendar months, the holders of the Preferred Stock as a class have the exclusive right to elect a majority of the authorized number of directors and the holders of the Preferred Stock A as a class have the exclusive right to elect two directors. Those rights cease whenever Duke Energy pays all accrued and unpaid dividends in full. Whenever six quarterly dividends on any outstanding series of the Preference Stock are in arrears or any required sinking fund payments are in default, the holders of the Preference Stock as a class have the exclusive right to elect two directors. This right ceases whenever all dividends and required sinking fund obligations in default have been paid in full or provided for. In addition, the consent of the holders of specified percentages of any outstanding Preferred Stock, Preferred Stock A or Preference Stock, or some or all of the holders of such classes, is required in connection with certain increases in authorized amounts of or changes in stock senior to the Common Stock or in connection with any sale of substantially all of Duke Energy's assets or certain mergers. 28 Rights Upon Liquidation The holders of Common Stock are entitled in liquidation to share ratably in the assets of Duke Energy after payment of all debts and liabilities and after required preferential payments to the holders of outstanding Preferred Stocks. Miscellaneous The outstanding shares of Common Stock are, and the shares of Common Stock sold hereunder will be, upon payment for them, fully paid and nonassessable. Holders of Common Stock have no preemptive rights and no conversion rights. The Common Stock is not subject to redemption and is not entitled to the benefit of any sinking fund provisions. Transfer Agent and Registrar Duke Energy acts as transfer agent and registrar for the Common Stock. Preference Stock Purchase Rights Each share of Common Stock has attached to it a Preference Stock Purchase Right. The Rights initially are represented only by the certificates for the shares of Common Stock and will not trade separately from those shares unless and until: . ten days after it is publicly announced that a person or group (with certain exceptions) has acquired, or has obtained the right to acquire, the beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the outstanding Common Stock (an "acquiring person"); or . ten business days (or a later date determined by Duke Energy's Board of Directors) after the date a person or group commences, or public announcement is made that the person or group intends to commence, a tender or exchange offer that would result in the person or group becoming an acquiring person. If and when the Rights separate, each Right will entitle the holder to purchase 1/10,000 of a share of Duke Energy's Series A Participating Preference Stock for an exercise price that is presently $190. In the event that a person or group becomes an acquiring person, each Right (except for Rights beneficially owned by the acquiring person or its transferees, which Rights become void) will entitle its holder to purchase, for the exercise price, a number of shares of Common Stock having a market value of twice the exercise price. Also, if, after ten days following the date of the announcement that a person or group has become an acquiring person: . Duke Energy is involved in a merger or similar form of business combination in which Duke Energy is not the surviving corporation or in which Duke Energy is the surviving corporation but the Common Stock is changed or exchanged; or . more than 50% of Duke Energy's assets or earning power is sold or transferred; then each Right (except for voided Rights) will entitle its holder to purchase, for the exercise price, a number of shares of common stock of the acquiring company having a value of twice the exercise 29 price. If any person or group acquires from 15% to but excluding 50% of the outstanding Common Stock, Duke Energy's Board of Directors may, at its option, exchange each outstanding Right (except for those held by an acquiring person or its transferees) for one share of Common Stock or 1/10,000 of a share of Series A Participating Preference Stock. Duke Energy's Board of Directors may redeem the Rights for $0.01 per Right prior to ten business days after the date of the public announcement that a person or group has become an acquiring person. The Rights will not prevent a takeover of Duke Energy. However, the existence of the Rights may cause substantial dilution to a person or group that acquires 15% or more of the Common Stock unless the Board of Directors first redeems those Rights. Certain Anti-Takeover Matters Duke Energy's Articles and By-Laws include a number of provisions that may have the effect of encouraging persons considering unsolicited tender offers or other unilateral takeover proposals to negotiate with the Board of Directors rather than pursue non-negotiated takeover attempts. Those provisions include: Classified Board of Directors; Removal of Directors; Vacancies Duke Energy's Articles provide for a Board of Directors divided into three classes, with one class being elected each year to serve for a three-year term. As a result, at least two annual meetings of shareholders may be required for shareholders to change a majority of the Board of Directors. Duke Energy's shareholders may remove directors only for cause. Vacancies and newly created directorships on the Board of Directors may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors remaining in office, and no decrease in the number of directors may shorten the term of an incumbent director. The classification of directors and the inability of shareholders to remove directors without cause and to fill vacancies and newly created directorships on the Board of Directors will make it more difficult to change the composition of the Board of Directors, but will promote continuity of existing management. Advance Notice Requirements Duke Energy's By-Laws establish advance notice procedures with regard to shareholder proposals relating to the nomination of persons for election as directors or new business to be brought before annual meetings of shareholders. These procedures provide that shareholders must give timely notice of such proposals in writing to the Secretary of Duke Energy. Generally, to be timely with respect to an annual meeting of shareholders, notice must be received at Duke Energy's principal executive offices not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary date of the annual meeting for the preceding year. The notice must contain certain information specified in the By-Laws. Special Meetings of Shareholders Neither the Articles nor the By-Laws of Duke Energy give shareholders the right to call a special meeting of shareholders. The By-Laws provide that special meetings of shareholders may be called only by the Board of Directors or the Chairman of the Board. 30 Amendment of Certain Charter Provisions Duke Energy's Articles require the approval of not less than 80% of the voting power of all outstanding shares of Common Stock to amend provisions relating to the minimum and maximum size of the Board of Directors, the classification of the Board of Directors, the removal of directors, the filling of vacancies and newly created directorships on the Board of Directors and the requirement that a decrease in the number of directors constituting the Board of Directors may not shorten the term of any incumbent director. This amendment provision will make it more difficult to dilute the anti-takeover effects of Duke Energy's Articles and By-Laws. DESCRIPTION OF THE STOCK PURCHASE CONTRACTS AND THE STOCK PURCHASE UNITS Duke Energy may issue stock purchase contracts representing contracts obligating holders to purchase from Duke Energy, and Duke Energy to sell to the holders, a specified number of shares of Common Stock (or a range of numbers of shares pursuant to a predetermined formula) at a future date or dates. The price per share of Common Stock may be fixed at the time the stock purchase contracts are issued or may be determined by reference to a specific formula set forth in the stock purchase contracts. The stock purchase contracts may be issued separately or as a part of units, often known as stock purchase units, consisting of a stock purchase contract and either: . Senior Notes, Junior Subordinated Notes or other debt securities of Duke Energy or one of its subsidiaries; . debt obligations of third parties, including U.S. Treasury securities; or . Preferred Securities or trust preferred securities issued by trusts, all of whose common securities are owned by Duke Energy or by subsidiaries of Duke Energy, securing the holder's obligations to purchase the Common Stock under the stock purchase contracts. The stock purchase contracts may require Duke Energy to make periodic payments to the holders of the stock purchase units or vice versa, and such payments may be unsecured or prefunded on some basis. The stock purchase contracts may require holders to secure their obligations in a specified manner and in certain circumstances Duke Energy may deliver newly issued prepaid stock purchase contracts, often known as prepaid securities, upon release to a holder of any collateral securing such holder's obligations under the original stock purchase contract. The applicable prospectus supplement will describe the terms of any stock purchase contracts or stock purchase units and, if applicable, prepaid securities. The description in the applicable prospectus supplement will not contain all of the information that you may find useful. For more information, you should review the stock purchase contracts, the collateral arrangements and depositary arrangements, if applicable, relating to such stock purchase contracts or stock purchase units and, if applicable, the prepaid securities and the document pursuant to which the prepaid securities will be issued. These documents will be filed with the SEC promptly after the offering of such stock purchase contracts or stock purchase units and, if applicable, prepaid securities. 31 DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED SECURITIES Each Trust may issue only one series of Preferred Securities. The Trust Agreement of each Trust will authorize the Administrative Trustees to issue the Preferred Securities of that Trust on behalf of that Trust. For additional information you should refer to the applicable Trust Agreement. The form of Trust Agreement is an exhibit to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part. The prospectus supplement for a particular series of Preferred Securities being offered will disclose the specific terms related to the offering, including the price or prices at which the Preferred Securities to be offered will be issued. Those terms will include some or all of the following: . the title of the series; . the number of Preferred Securities of the series; . the yearly distribution rate, or the method of determining that rate, and the date or dates on which distributions will be payable; . the date or dates, or method of determining the date or dates, from which distributions will be cumulative; . the amount that will be paid out of the assets of the Trust to the holders of the Preferred Securities upon the voluntary or involuntary dissolution, winding-up or termination of the Trust; . any obligation that the Trust has to purchase or redeem the Preferred Securities, and the price at which, the period within which, and the terms and conditions upon which the Trust will purchase or redeem them; . any voting rights of the Preferred Securities that are in addition to those legally required, including any right that the holders of the Preferred Securities have to approve certain actions under or amendments to the Trust Agreement; . any right that the Trust has to defer distributions on the Preferred Securities in the event that Duke Energy extends the interest payment period on the related Junior Subordinated Notes; and . any other rights, preferences, privileges, limitations or restrictions upon the Preferred Securities of the series. Duke Energy will guarantee each series of Preferred Securities to the extent described below under the caption "Description of the Guarantees." The applicable prospectus supplement will describe any material United States federal income tax considerations that apply to the Preferred Securities. 32 DESCRIPTION OF THE GUARANTEES Duke Energy will execute the Guarantees from time to time for the benefit of the holders of the Preferred Securities of the respective Trusts. The Chase Manhattan Bank will act as Guarantee Trustee under each Guarantee. The Guarantee Trustee will hold each Guarantee for the benefit of the holders of the Preferred Securities to which it relates. The following description of the Guarantees is only a summary and is not intended to be comprehensive. The form of Guarantee is an exhibit to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part. General Duke Energy will irrevocably and unconditionally agree under each Guarantee to pay the Guarantee Payments that are defined below, to the extent specified in that Guarantee, to the holders of the Preferred Securities to which the Guarantee relates, to the extent that the Guarantee Payments are not paid by or on behalf of the related Trust. Duke Energy is required to pay the Guarantee Payments to the extent specified in the relevant Guarantee regardless of any defense, right of set-off or counterclaim that Duke Energy may have or may assert against any person. The following payments and distributions on the Preferred Securities of a Trust are Guarantee Payments: . any accrued and unpaid distributions required to be paid on the Preferred Securities of the Trust, but only to the extent that the Trust has funds legally and immediately available for those distributions; . the redemption price for any Preferred Securities that the Trust calls for redemption, including all accrued and unpaid distributions to the redemption date, but only to the extent that the Trust has funds legally and immediately available for the payment; and . upon a dissolution, winding-up or termination of the Trust, other than in connection with the distribution of Junior Subordinated Notes to the holders of Trust Securities of the Trust or the redemption of all the Preferred Securities of the Trust, the lesser of: . the sum of the liquidation amount and all accrued and unpaid distributions on the Preferred Securities of the Trust to the payment date, to the extent that the Trust has funds legally and immediately available for the payment; and . the amount of assets of the Trust remaining available for distribution to holders of the Preferred Securities of the Trust in liquidation of the Trust. Duke Energy may satisfy its obligation to make a Guarantee Payment by making that payment directly to the holders of the related Preferred Securities or by causing the Trust to make the payment to those holders. Each Guarantee will be a full and unconditional guarantee, subject to certain subordination provisions, of the Guarantee Payments with respect to the related Preferred Securities from the time of issuance of those Preferred Securities, except that the Guarantee will only apply to the payment of distributions and other payments on the Preferred Securities when the Trust has sufficient funds legally and immediately available to make those distributions or other payments. 33 If Duke Energy does not make the required payments on the Junior Subordinated Notes that the Property Trustee holds under a Trust, that Trust will not make the related payments on its Preferred Securities. Subordination Duke Energy's obligations under each Guarantee will be unsecured obligations of Duke Energy. Those obligations will rank: . subordinate and junior in right of payment to all of Duke Energy's other liabilities, other than obligations or liabilities that rank equal in priority or subordinate by their terms; . equal in priority with Duke Energy's Preferred Stock and Preferred Stock A and similar guarantees; and . senior to Duke Energy's Common Stock. Duke Energy has Preferred Stock and Preferred Stock A outstanding that will rank equal in priority with the Guarantees and has Common Stock outstanding that will rank junior to the Guarantees. Each Guarantee will be a guarantee of payment and not of collection. This means that the guaranteed party may institute a legal proceeding directly against Duke Energy, as guarantor, to enforce its rights under the Guarantee without first instituting a legal proceeding against any other person or entity. The terms of the Preferred Securities will provide that each holder of the Preferred Securities, by accepting those Preferred Securities, agrees to the subordination provisions and other terms of the related Guarantee. Amendments and Assignment Duke Energy may amend each Guarantee without the consent of any holder of the Preferred Securities to which that Guarantee relates if the amendment does not materially and adversely affect the rights of those holders. Duke Energy may otherwise amend each Guarantee with the approval of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding Preferred Securities to which that Guarantee relates. Termination Each Guarantee will terminate and be of no further effect when: . the redemption price of the Preferred Securities to which the Guarantee relates is fully paid; . Duke Energy distributes the related Junior Subordinated Notes to the holders of those Preferred Securities; or . the amounts payable upon liquidation of the related Trust are fully paid. Each Guarantee will remain in effect or will be reinstated if at any time any holder of the related Preferred Securities must restore payment of any sums paid to that holder with respect to those Preferred Securities or under that Guarantee. 34 Events of Default An event of default will occur under any Guarantee if Duke Energy fails to perform any of its payment obligations under that Guarantee. The holders of a majority of the Preferred Securities of any series may waive any such event of default and its consequences on behalf of all of the holders of the Preferred Securities of that series. The Guarantee Trustee is obligated to enforce the Guarantee for the benefit of the holders of the Preferred Securities of a series if an event of default occurs under the related Guarantee. The holders of a majority of the Preferred Securities to which a Guarantee relates have the right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to the Guarantee Trustee with respect to that Guarantee or to direct the exercise of any trust or power that the Guarantee Trustee holds under that Guarantee. Any holder of the related Preferred Securities may institute a legal proceeding directly against Duke Energy to enforce that holder's rights under the Guarantee without first instituting a legal proceeding against the Guarantee Trustee or any other person or entity. Concerning the Guarantee Trustee The Chase Manhattan Bank is the Guarantee Trustee. It is also the Property Trustee, the Subordinated Indenture Trustee, the Senior Indenture Trustee and the Bond Trustee. Duke Energy and certain of its affiliates maintain deposit accounts and banking relationships with The Chase Manhattan Bank. The Chase Manhattan Bank also serves as trustee under other indentures pursuant to which securities of Duke Energy and certain of its affiliates are outstanding. The Guarantee Trustee will perform only those duties that are specifically set forth in each Guarantee unless an event of default under the Guarantee occurs and is continuing. In case an event of default occurs and is continuing, the Guarantee Trustee will exercise the same degree of care as a prudent individual would exercise in the conduct of his or her own affairs. Subject to those provisions, the Guarantee Trustee is under no obligation to exercise any of its powers under any Guarantee at the request of any holder of the related Preferred Securities unless that holder offers reasonable indemnity to the Guarantee Trustee against the costs, expenses and liabilities which it might incur as a result. Agreements as to Expenses and Liabilities Duke Energy will enter into an Agreement as to Expenses and Liabilities under each Trust Agreement. Each Agreement as to Expenses and Liabilities will provide that Duke Energy will, with certain exceptions, irrevocably and unconditionally guarantee the full payment of any indebtedness, expenses or liabilities of the related Trust to each person or entity to whom that Trust becomes indebted or liable. The exceptions are the obligations of the Trust to pay to the holders of the related Preferred Securities or other similar interests in that Trust the amounts due to the holders under the terms of those Preferred Securities or those similar interests. 35 PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION Duke Energy and the Trusts may sell securities to one or more underwriters or dealers for public offering and sale by them, or it may sell the securities to investors directly or through agents. The prospectus supplement relating to the securities being offered will set forth the terms of the offering and the method of distribution and will identify any firms acting as underwriters, dealers or agents in connection with the offering, including: . the name or names of any underwriters; . the purchase price of the securities and the proceeds to Duke Energy or the Trusts from the sale; . any underwriting discounts and other items constituting underwriters' compensation; . any public offering price; . any discounts or concessions allowed or reallowed or paid to dealers; and . any securities exchange or market on which the securities may be listed. Only those underwriters identified in the prospectus supplement are deemed to be underwriters in connection with the securities offered in the prospectus supplement. Duke Energy and the Trusts may distribute the securities from time to time in one or more transactions at a fixed price or prices, which may be changed, or at prices determined as the prospectus supplement specifies. Duke Energy may sell securities through forward contracts or similar arrangements. In connection with the sale of securities, underwriters, dealers or agents may be deemed to have received compensation from Duke Energy in the form of underwriting discounts or commissions and also may receive commissions from securities purchasers for whom they may act as agent. Underwriters may sell the securities to or through dealers, and such dealers may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the underwriters or commissions from the purchasers for whom they may act as agent. Duke Energy may sell the securities directly or through agents it designates from time to time. Any agent involved in the offer or sale of the securities covered by this prospectus, other than at the market offerings of common stock, will be named in a prospectus supplement relating to such securities. At the market offerings of common stock may be made by agents. Commissions payable by Duke Energy to agents will be set forth in a prospectus supplement relating to the securities being offered. Unless otherwise indicated in a prospectus supplement, any such agents will be acting on a best-efforts basis for the period of their appointment. Some of the underwriters, dealers or agents and some of their affiliates who participate in the securities distribution may engage in other transactions with, and perform other services for, Duke Energy and its subsidiaries or affiliates in the ordinary course of business. Any underwriting or other compensation which Duke Energy pays to underwriters or agents in connection with the securities offering, and any discounts, concessions or commissions which underwriters allow to dealers, will be set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement. Underwriters, 36 dealers and agents participating in the securities distribution may be deemed to be underwriters, and any discounts and commissions they receive and any profit they realize on the resale of the securities may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act of 1933. Underwriters, and their controlling persons, and agents may be entitled, under agreements entered into with Duke Energy and the Trusts, to indemnification against certain civil liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933. 37 EXPERTS The consolidated financial statements of Duke Energy incorporated in this prospectus by reference from Duke Energy's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their report, which is incorporated by reference into this prospectus, and have been so incorporated in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing. VALIDITY OF THE SECURITIES Ellen T. Ruff, Esq., who is Duke Energy's Vice President and General Counsel, Corporate and Electric Operations, and Dewey Ballantine LLP will issue opinions about the validity of the securities offered by Duke Energy in the applicable prospectus supplement for Duke Energy. Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., special Delaware counsel, will issue opinions about the validity of the Preferred Securities offered in the applicable prospectus supplement for the Trusts. Counsel named in the applicable prospectus supplement will issue opinions about the validity of the securities offered by Duke Energy for any underwriters. WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION Duke Energy files annual, quarterly and current reports and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any documents that are filed at any of the following: . SEC Public Reference Room 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549; . Citicorp Center 500 West Madison Street Suite 1400 Chicago, Illinois 60661-2411; or . Seven World Trade Center Suite 1300 New York, New York 10048. You may also obtain copies of these documents at prescribed rates from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at its Washington address. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information. Duke Energy's filings are also available to the public through: . The SEC web site at http://www.sec.gov; and . The New York Stock Exchange 20 Broad Street New York, New York 10005. 38 Information about Duke Energy is also available on its web site at http://www.duke-energy.com. Such web site is not a part of this prospectus. The SEC allows Duke Energy to "incorporate by reference" the information Duke Energy files with it, which information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement, and later information that Duke Energy files with the SEC will automatically update and supersede that information as well as the information included in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement. Duke Energy incorporates by reference the documents listed below and any future filings made with the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14, or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 filed prior to the termination of this offering: . Duke Energy's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999; . Duke Energy's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2000, June 30, 2000 and September 30, 2000; and . Duke Energy's current reports on Form 8-K dated March 3, 2000, April 28, 2000 and December 19, 2000. Duke Energy will provide without charge a copy of these filings, other than any exhibits unless the exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference into this prospectus. You may request your copy by writing Duke Energy at the following address or telephoning one of the following numbers: Investor Relations Department Duke Energy Corporation P.O. Box 1005 Charlotte, North Carolina 28201 (704) 382-3853 or (800) 488-3853 (toll-free) 39 [LOGO OF DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION]