================================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
[X] AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000
OR
[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _________ to ________
Commission File No. 1-2267
THE MEAD CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Ohio 31-0535759
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
MEAD WORLD HEADQUARTERS
COURTHOUSE PLAZA NORTHEAST
DAYTON, OHIO 45463
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 937-495-6323
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name of Each Exchange
Title of Each Class on which Registered
-------------------- -------------------
Common Shares Without Par Value New York Stock Exchange
and Common Share Purchase Rights Chicago Stock Exchange
Pacific Exchange
_________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No __.
_________________________
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [_]
_________________________
As of January 23, 2001, the aggregate market value of the voting shares
held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $2,860,145,445
determined by multiplying the highest selling price of a Common Share on the New
York Stock Exchange--Composite Transactions Tape on such date, times the amount
by which the total shares outstanding exceeded the shares beneficially owned by
directors and executive officers of the Registrant. Such determination shall
not, however, be deemed to be an admission that any person is an "affiliate" as
defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act of 1933.
The number of Common Shares outstanding at March 5, 2001 was 99,104,386.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of Registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders scheduled to be held on April 26, 2001, are incorporated by
reference in Part III; definitive copies of said Proxy Statement were filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2001.
================================================================================
PART I
Item 1. Business
Mead manufactures and sells:
. paper;
. pulp;
. paperboard;
. lumber; and
. other wood products.
Mead also manufactures and distributes consumer and office supplies including
time-management products.
Mead was incorporated in 1930 under the laws of the state of Ohio as
the outgrowth of a paper manufacturing business founded in 1846, and has its
principal executive offices at Mead World Headquarters, Courthouse Plaza
Northeast, Dayton, Ohio 45463, telephone (937) 495-6323. Except as otherwise
indicated by the context, the terms "Company" or "Mead" as used herein refer to
The Mead Corporation and its subsidiaries.
Segment Information
Segment information is also included in Note U on pages 44-46.
Paper
Mead's Paper division manufactures:
. coated and uncoated papers for use by publishers of books, magazines,
catalogs, and advertising brochures and by commercial printers;
. form bond and carbonless paper and papers for conversion by
others into business forms;
. cut-size copier paper; and
. other uncoated papers for conversion by others into such products as
greeting cards.
The division sells papers nationwide, both on a direct basis to publishers,
printers and converters and through paper merchants. The pulp mills adjacent to
the paper mills of this division produce most of the pulp required for use in
the paper mills. The division owns various timberlands in:
. Kentucky;
. Maine;
. Michigan
. New Hampshire; and
. Ohio.
The Gilbert Paper division manufactures premium cotton content business
correspondence papers and premium text and cover papers for printed business
use. The papers are specified by graphic designers and sold principally through
wholesale paper merchants in the United States and internationally.
Mead's Specialty Paper division manufactures and sells, primarily
through its own sales force, decorative and overlay laminating papers. The
division also manufactures and sells tape papers and specialty papers used in
industrial applications. The division's principal customers include
manufacturers that serve the building materials, automotive and furniture
industries.
The Mead Pulp Sales division supplies Mead's needs for purchased pulp
and is a sales agent for affiliated and nonaffiliated mills. The division sells
market pulp produced by:
. Great Lakes Pulp and Fibre, Inc. of Menominee, Michigan;
. American Fiber Resources of Fairmont, West Virginia; and
. Mead Paper of Escanaba, Michigan and Rumford, Maine.
The division also represents Metsa-Botnia of Sweden for the sale of its pulp in
North America. The division sells directly to customers in North America and
1
through contract and independent agents in all other major pulp-consuming areas
of the world.
Packaging and Paperboard
The Mead Packaging division designs and produces multiple packaging and
packaging systems primarily for the beverage take-home market. The division
operates through a network of subsidiaries, affiliates and licensees in:
. the United States;
. Canada;
. Europe;
. the Far East;
. Mexico; and
. Latin America.
Demand for most beverage packaging in North America and Europe is seasonal with
inventories being built from November to March for the peak soft drink and beer
sales of April through October.
Mead Coated Board, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mead:
. operates a coated paperboard mill near Phenix City, Alabama;
. sawmills in Cottonton, Alabama and Greenville, Georgia;
. and owns various timberlands in Alabama and Georgia.
The subsidiary is engaged primarily in the manufacture of coated unbleached
kraft paperboard products used:
. by the beverage packaging industry; and
. by manufacturers of folding cartons for consumer products such as
soaps, food products, hardware and apparel.
The entire output of the Phenix City mill is sold by Mead Coated Board, Inc. to
the Mead Coated Board division. The division sells approximately 60% of the mill
output to the Mead Packaging division. The remainder is sold to folding carton
manufacturers in North America and Europe. The division's customers are most
concerned about physical strength properties of the paperboard and its quality
for reprographics.
The Mead Containerboard division sells standard and special purpose
corrugated shipping containers manufactured at seven converting plants located
in the Midwestern and Southeastern regions of the United States from raw
materials received from outside sources and from the division's Stevenson,
Alabama corrugating medium mill. The division also sells corrugating medium from
the Stevenson mill to unaffiliated manufacturers of containers. The division
owns various timberlands in Alabama and Tennessee.
Forest Products Affiliate
Northwood Panelboard Company ("Panelboard"), a partnership owned 50% by
Mead and 50% by Nexfor Inc., located in Bemidji, Minnesota, has the annual
capacity to produce approximately 400 million square feet of oriented strand
board ("OSB") (3/8-inch basis). All of the wood products produced by Panelboard
are sold through a subsidiary of Nexfor Inc. in North America.
Consumer and Office Products
The Mead Consumer and Office Products division manufactures and
distributes:
. a line of school supplies, including:
- filler paper;
- wirebound notebooks;
- portfolios; and
- looseleaf binders;
. a line of office supply products, including:
- envelopes;
- filing supplies; and
- vinyl folders and binders
2
. computer accessories, including:
- paper based products for computer use;
- laptop computer cases; and
- multi-media storage devices; and
. a line of time management products, including:
- planners;
- organizers; and
- calendars.
The division's products are distributed primarily through:
. mass market retailers;
. office supply superstores;
. commercial stationers; and
. warehouse clubs.
The school supply business is highly seasonal with inventories built in the
winter and spring for shipment in late spring and summer, the calendar planners
and time management products are shipped primarily in the second half of the
year, while the home and office products and computer accessories portion of the
business is generally less seasonal in nature. Manufacturing is done in seven
facilities and distributed from eight distribution centers in the United States.
Internationally, one manufacturing facility and distribution center is located
in Canada and one manufacturing facility and distribution center is located in
Mexico.
The revenue Mead receives from each segment discussed above for the
past three years is set forth in the following table.
Percentage of Revenue
Segment 2000 1999 1998
Paper 44% 47% 48%
Packaging and Paperboard 37% 40% 40%
Consumer and Office Products 19% 13% 12%
Timberlands
Mead obtains most of its wood requirements from private contractors or
suppliers and from Company-owned timberlands. The annual wood requirement for
Mead's wholly-owned operations and Northwood Panelboard Company in 2000 was
approximately 10,800,000 tons, of which approximately 22% was obtained from
timberlands owned or leased by Mead. The annual wood requirement for Mead's
wholly-owned operations and for Northwood Panelboard Company expected in 2001
will be approximately the same.
As of December 31, 2000, Mead owned or controlled approximately
2,104,000 acres of timberlands in the United States. Approximately 107,000 acres
of land are controlled by Mead under long-term agreements that expire at
different times through 2027.
International Sales and Operations
Outside of the United States and Canada, Mead and its affiliates
operate a paperboard sheeting facility and are engaged in the manufacture of
multiple packaging systems and folding carton packaging in Europe, Asia and
Latin America. Mead Specialty Paper operates a decorative laminate and specialty
paper mill in England. Mead Consumer and Office Products also operates from
manufacturing and distribution locations in Canada and Mexico. Mead also has
sales subsidiaries, affiliates, agents or distributors in a number of countries
in Europe, Asia, Australia and Latin America.
Competition
Mead competes on a worldwide basis in its product lines, and the
markets in which Mead sells its products are highly competitive. Several factors
affect Mead's competitive position, including:
. quality;
. technology;
3
. product design;
. customer service;
. price; and
. cost.
Divisions within the Paper segment compete with numerous major paper
manufacturers both domestic and foreign including:
. International Paper Co.;
. Stora-Enso Oyj;
. UPM-Kymmene Corporation;
. Sappi Fine Paper;
. Wausau Mosinee Paper Co.; and
. Kimberly Clark Corporation's Neenah Paper Company.
Divisions within the Packaging and Paperboard segment compete with
boxboard producers including:
. Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation;
. Georgia Pacific Corporation;
. International Paper;
. Carauster Industries, Inc.;
. Stora Enso;
. Riverwood International Corp.;
. Weyerhaeuser Co.;
. as well as suppliers of plastic, foil and pouch packaging materials
and containers.
The Consumer and Office Products segment competes with North American
and regional converters as well as foreign producers. Some of the competitors in
this segment have broad product offerings while others are focused on narrow
product offerings.
Employee and Labor Relations
Mead employs approximately 12,700 persons within the United States
and 2,380 persons outside the United States. Approximately 7,780 are production,
maintenance and clerical employees represented by labor unions. Mead's 50% owned
company, Panelboard, employs approximately 140 persons. Mead has approximately
28 labor agreements currently in force, of which approximately one-fifth are
subject to renegotiation each year.
Mead's employee relations policies are based on mutual confidence and
trust. All Mead labor contract negotiations during 2000 were concluded without
any strikes.
Trademarks, Trade Names, Patents, and Franchises
Mead has a large number of trademarks and trade names under which it
conducts its business. The loss of the use of the "Mead" name would be material.
Mead also has a great number and variety of patents, patent rights and licenses
relating to its business. While, in the aggregate, intellectual property rights
are material to Mead's business, the loss of any one or any related group of
such rights would not have a material adverse effect on the business of Mead
except as to the "Mead" mark.
Environmental Laws and Regulations
Mead's operations are subject to extensive regulation by various
national, regional and local environmental control statutes and regulations.
These regulations impose effluent and emission limitations, waste disposal and
other requirements upon the operations of Mead, and require Mead to obtain and
operate in compliance with the conditions of permits and similar authorizations
from the appropriate governmental authorities. Mead has obtained, has
applications pending, or is making application for such permits and
authorizations. Mead does not anticipate that compliance with such statutes and
regulations will have a material adverse effect on its competitive position or
its overall business. Mead's competitors are subject to the same statutes and
regulations, and while individual regulatory programs may impact competitors
somewhat differently, Mead expects that in the aggregate these statutes and
regulations affect competitors to a relatively similar degree.
4
During the past three years (January 1, 1998 - December 31, 2000), Mead
constructed air and water pollution control and other environmental facilities
at a cost of approximately $70 million. Environmental expenditures in the future
are anticipated to include long-term projects for maintenance and upgrade of
wastewater treatment plants, process modifications and air emission controls.
Due to changes in environmental laws and regulations, the application of such
laws and regulations and changes in environmental control technology, it is not
possible for Mead to predict with certainty the amount of capital expenditures
to be incurred for environmental purposes. Taking these uncertainties into
account, Mead estimates that in the next three years it may be required to incur
expenditures of approximately $54 million.
Various Great Lakes states, including Michigan and Ohio, have adopted
water quality regulations consistent with the federal Great Lakes Initiative
("GLI"). These state regulations have been approved in large part by the United
States Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA"), although some elements of each
state's program have been disapproved and are subject to change. Mead does not
expect that any significant additional capital expenditures will be necessary to
comply with the requirements of the Michigan GLI regulations. The State of Ohio
determined that it would not apply all GLI regulations to facilities discharging
into the Ohio River Basin for the time being. Mead does not expect that any
significant additional capital expenditures will be necessary to comply with any
requirements of the Ohio GLI regulations applicable to the Ohio River Basin.
The USEPA has undertaken several initiatives to reduce ozone-causing
pollutants from large utility and industrial sources in the Midwest. These
initiatives follow claims by several "downwind" Northeastern states that
emissions from the Midwestern sources impair their ability to meet national
ozone standards. USEPA is seeking emission reductions through several
techniques, including a call for states to adopt more stringent emission
controls on all or some of the sources within their boundaries (the "NOx SIP
Call") and the promulgation of new federal emission standards that may be
applied to specific identified sources in the affected states. Ohio, Michigan
and Alabama are among the states affected by these USEPA initiatives. Legal
challenges to these initiatives have been filed by one or more of the affected
states and various private organizations. Notwithstanding pending legal
challenges, Ohio, Michigan and Alabama have proposed new regulatory programs
intended to satisfy the NOx SIP Call. As proposed, a total allowable emissions
level would be specified for each affected facility, which could be satisfied
through a variety of actions, ranging from curtailing use of equipment to
installing additional emissions control systems. Alternatively, additional
emissions allowances could be acquired through a form of emissions trading with
other emission sources. These state programs are not final and Mead has not
determined what actions it will want or need to take to assure compliance with
these new programs. No new emission limitations or standards are expected to
take effect before 2004. Mead, at this time, does not expect that any
significant capital expenditures beyond the expenditures stated above will be
necessary in the next three years to assure compliance.
Dioxin currently cannot be detected under normal operating conditions
in treated effluents from Mead's three U.S. bleached paper mills. All three
mills have eliminated elemental chlorine from their bleaching operations and
were in compliance with the effluent requirements of pulp and paper Cluster
Rules in advance of the regulatory deadlines.
In 1999, USEPA announced its intention to emphasize review and
enforcement of compliance with the major source air permitting program
established under the Clean Air Act. The Agency identified certain industries on
which it intended to focus, including the pulp and paper industry. During 1999
and 2000, USEPA issued Notices of Violation against eight other companies with
kraft pulp mills in Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia and
Wisconsin, alleging various violations of the Clean Air Act dating back to the
late 1970's and early 1980's. In one case, USEPA has proceeded to file suit in
Federal District Court. To Mead's knowledge, none of these enforcement matters
have been settled or resolved. In 1999 and 2000, Mead received multiple requests
for information (pursuant to Section 114 of the Clean Air Act) from USEPA
concerning Mead's kraft pulp mills in Chillicothe, Ohio, Rumford, Maine, Phenix
City, Alabama and Escanaba, Michigan. Mead has responded to all of the requests
and is continuing to cooperate with USEPA. Mead has not received any Notices of
Violations or other claims relating to these matters.
5
Mead has been notified by the USEPA or by various state or local
governments that it may be liable under federal environmental laws or under
applicable state or local laws with respect to the cleanup of hazardous
substances at six sites currently operated or used by Mead. Mead is also
currently named as a potentially responsible party ("PRP"), or has received
third party requests for contribution under federal, state or local laws with
respect to at least 20 sites sold by Mead over many years or owned by
contractors used by Mead for disposal purposes. Some of these proceedings are
described in more detail in Part I, Item 3, "Legal Proceedings." There are other
former Mead facilities and those of contractors which may contain contamination
or which may have contributed to potential Superfund sites but for which Mead
has not received any notice or claim. Mead's potential liability for all these
sites will depend upon several factors, including the extent of contamination,
the method of remediation, insurance coverage and contribution by other PRPs.
Although the costs that Mead may be required to pay for remediation of all these
owned and unowned sites are not certain at this time, Mead has established
reserves of approximately $40 million relating to current environmental
litigation and proceedings which it believes are probable and reasonably
estimable. These reserves were established after considering the number of other
PRPs, their ability to pay their portion of the costs, the volumetric amount, if
any, of Mead's contribution, and other factors. Expenses to be charged to this
reserve are not included in the anticipated capital expenditures for the next
three years stated above. Mead believes that it is reasonably possible that
costs associated with these owned and unowned sites may exceed current reserves
by amounts that may prove insignificant or by as much as approximately $40
million. This estimate of the range of reasonably possible additional costs is
less certain than the estimate upon which reserves are based.
The Environment Agency of the United Kingdom ("UK") is in the process
of implementing Pollution Prevention and Control regulations to meet the
requirements of the European Community's Integrated Pollution Prevention and
Control Directive 96/91. Mead's United Kingdom mill will be expected to meet the
standards contained in UK's new Technical Guidance for the Pulp and Paper Sector
by June 2004. Mead expects that upgrades to the mill's wastewater treatment
plant will be necessary. The capital expenditures required to comply with these
standards are included in the expected capital expenditures stated above.
Mead believes that most of the earlier expenditures for environmental
control have been beneficial. However, Mead and the trade associations of which
Mead is a member have challenged and will continue to challenge in
administrative and judicial proceedings, federal and state environmental control
regulations which they do not believe are beneficial to the environment or the
public. In some instances, Mead and those trade associations may also seek
legislative remedies to correct unnecessary or impractical requirements of
existing laws.
In addition to promulgated regulations, Mead follows developing
environmental issues and proposed regulations that could affect Mead's
operations in the future. It may take years for issues to evolve into general
proposals and ultimately into specific laws or regulations. The Company reports
on these matters at the time that is appropriate under rules promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission and consistent with generally accepted
accounting principles.
Item 2. Properties
Mead considers that its facilities are suitable and adequate for the
operations involved. Certain Mead facilities are owned, in whole or in part, by
municipal or other public authorities pursuant to standard industrial
development revenue bond financing arrangements and are accounted for as
property owned by Mead. Mead holds options under which it may purchase each of
these facilities from such authorities by paying a nominal purchase price and
repaying the indebtedness owed on the industrial development revenue bonds at
the time of the purchase. Those properties that are subject to these
arrangements have certain encumbrances and mortgages upon them and are noted
below by an asterisk. The properties at the facilities covered by these
arrangements are air, water and solid waste pollution control systems and
equipment. For additional information regarding these industrial development
revenue bonds see Note G. Subject to the foregoing and with the exception of
certain warehouses, general offices and timberlands which are leased, Mead owns
all of the properties described herein. For additional information regarding
leases see Note Q on page 43. For additional
6
information concerning Mead's timberlands and properties of affiliates, see Part
I, Item 1, "Business."
Mead's corporate headquarters are in Dayton, Ohio and its principal
facilities are at the locations listed:
Business Unit Facility Locations Principal Use
- ------------- ------------------ -------------
Paper Chillicothe, Ohio Pulp mill, coated, uncoated and
carbonless paper mill
Fremont, Ohio Carbonless coating facility
Escanaba, Michigan Pulp mill, coated paper mill
Rumford, Maine Pulp mill, coated paper mill
Gilbert Paper Menasha, Wisconsin Cotton and recycled content and
specialty paper mill
Appleton, Wisconsin Converting and distribution center
Business Unit Facility Locations Principal Use
- ------------- ------------------ -------------
Specialty Paper South Lee, Massachusetts Decorative
Potsdam, New York laminating and
County Devon, England specialty paper mills
Packaging Lanett, Alabama Paperboard packaging,
Atlanta, Georgia multiple packaging
Buena Park, California systems for beverage and
Chicago, Illinois food, packaging
Ajax, Ontario, Canada machinery manufacturing
Chateauroux, France or repair facilities
Trento, Italy
Roosendaal, The Netherlands
Trier-Ehrang, Germany
Bristol, England
Shimada, Japan
Bilbao, Spain
Containerboard 7 plants within the United States Corrugated container
in midwest and southern regions manufacturing facilities
Stevenson, Alabama* Corrugating medium mill
Coated Board Phenix City, Alabama* Coated paperboard mill,
Venlo, The Netherlands sheeting facilities
Cottonton, Alabama and sawmills
Greenville, Georgia
Consumer and Office 7 manufacturing and 8 Home, office, consumer
Products distribution locations throughout and school products
the United States, manufacturing and
and one manufacturing distribution facilities
distribution location in Toronto,
Ontario, Canada, one manufacturing
location in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico,
and one distribution location in
Mexico City, Mexico
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In 1991, Beazer East Inc. ("Beazer") sued Mead in the United States
District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (C.A. No. 91-0408),
alleging that Mead is liable to Beazer for certain past and future environmental
7
remediation costs incurred by Beazer at the former Woodward Facility located in
Dolomite, Alabama. Mead acquired the Woodward Facility by merger in 1968, and in
1974 sold it to Koppers, Inc., which was later acquired by Beazer. In March
2000, the District Court entered an allocation order establishing Mead's share
of recoverable costs at 67.5%. The Court also set a schedule for trial of all
remaining issues between the parties, to be commenced at an unspecified date in
2001. Mead may not appeal the allocation order until all trial litigation is
concluded. Although the extent of contamination and the method of remediation to
be required are not known at this time, based on information currently available
to Mead, after considering established reserves and rights to contribution, Mead
does not expect this proceeding will have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition, liquidity or results of operations of the Company.
The Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation ("TDEC")
advised Mead in 1991 that a closed coke manufacturing facility located in
Chattanooga, Tennessee (the "Coke Plant Site") is a hazardous substance site
within the meaning of the Tennessee Hazardous Waste Management Act, and that
Mead may be a potentially responsible party. In 1994, Mead undertook a removal
action at the closed coke plant site, consisting of demolition of structures,
removal of asbestos, control of surface water ponding and repairs to fencing.
Mead has engaged in discussions with TDEC concerning the scope of any additional
remedial actions that may be required for the site, although no determinations
had been made as of the end of 2000. The coke plant was owned by the Defense
Plant Corporation during World War II and sold by the War Assets Administration
in 1946. Woodward Iron Company, which subsequently became a division of Mead,
acquired the coke plant in 1964, and Mead sold the coke plant site to third
parties in 1974. Although the extent of contamination and the possible methods
of remediation are not known at this time, based on information currently
available to Mead, after considering established reserves and rights to
contribution, Mead does not expect this proceeding will have a material adverse
effect on the financial condition, liquidity or results of operations of the
Company.
In June 1996, USEPA announced plans to undertake an interim removal
action involving the excavation and treatment/disposal of bulk tar deposits
located in or near the Chattanooga Creek and certain waste piles located near
the Coke Plant Site. Costs of the proposed removal action were estimated by
USEPA at the time to be approximately $5.1 million. In July 1996, several PRPs,
including Mead and the U.S. Department of Defense, received special notice
letters from USEPA advising them of their potential liability for the removal
action. In December 1996, USEPA issued Unilateral Administrative Orders under
Section 106 of CERCLA to Mead and two other private parties. In January 1997,
Mead indicated its intent to not comply with the 106 Order. Preliminary analyses
by USEPA have indicated that dumping in Chattanooga Creek occurred when the coke
plant was doubled in size to meet World War II government requirements. A party
who, without sufficient cause, refuses to comply with an order issued under
Section 106 of CERCLA may be subject to fines of up to $27,500 per day and
punitive damages in an amount up to three times the costs incurred by the USEPA
as a result of the failure to comply with such order. Mead believes, based on
its review of the facts and the law applicable to the matter, including the
absence of findings by the USEPA, that it had sufficient cause for its decision
not to comply with the 106 Order. However, if the USEPA decides to bring an
enforcement action against Mead as a result of its failure to comply with the
106 Order, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of such action. USEPA
completed the removal action in November, 1998 and issued a Final Action Report
in 1999. More contamination than expected was discovered and excavated. In a
January 2000 letter, USEPA indicated that the cost of the removal action was
approximately $13 million and the Agency would seek recovery of these costs from
the PRPs. The letter did not address future remediation costs; however, USEPA
issued a draft Feasibility Study in 1999 that estimated future costs to complete
the remediation of Chattanooga Creek in the range of $6.3 million to $12.6
million. There were no significant changes or developments during 2000. Based on
information currently available to Mead, after considering established reserves,
and rights to contribution, Mead does not expect this proceeding will have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition, liquidity or results of
operations of the Company.
In August 1997, Mead filed a Complaint in the Circuit Court for
Jefferson County, Alabama (Case No. CV9705117) against a number of insurance
companies who had provided insurance to the Woodward Iron Company and/or Mead
facilities operated under the former Industrial Products division. The Complaint
8
seeks a declaratory judgment and damages for the insurers' failure to provide a
defense and coverage for claims in Beazer East Inc., the Coke Plant Site and
Chattanooga Creek proceedings.
In 1999, Mead received notice from the Rock-Tenn Company of a demand
from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality ("MDEQ") concerning
Rock-Tenn's Otsego, Michigan mill property. In the notice to Rock-Tenn, MDEQ
referred to potential liability under federal and state environmental laws for
certain discharges to the Kalamazoo River, including discharges of
polychlorinated biphenyls ("PCBs"), and for environmental response actions that
have been or may be undertaken at the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo
River Superfund Site or the Otsego mill property because of the presence of
PCBs. In 1987, Mead transferred the Otsego mill and other assets to Rock-Tenn
pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement. Rock-Tenn alleges Mead is legally
responsible for the presence of PCBs at the Otsego mill and that Rock-Tenn is
entitled to indemnification from Mead for all costs and liabilities associated
with the presence or discharge of PCBs. Mead disputes Rock-Tenn's allegations
and legal conclusions concerning Mead's responsibility, based in part on
Rock-Tenn's operations at the Otsego mill since 1987. Based on information
currently available to Mead, after considering established reserves and rights
to contribution, Mead does not expect these proceedings will have a material
adverse effect on the financial condition, liquidity or results of operations of
the Company.
In 1999, Mead received notice from the Maine Department of
Environmental Protection ("MDEP") that it was seeking an investigation and
possible remediation of certain solid waste management areas at Mead's Rumford,
Maine mill, including areas that may be a source of mercury contamination. Prior
to Mead's acquisition of the mill in November 1996, a chlor-alkali facility
using mercury operated on portions of the property. Mead has engaged in
discussions with the MDEP concerning the scope and nature of any required
investigation and/or remediation, but no determinations had been made as of the
end of 2000. Based on information currently available to Mead, after considering
rights to contribution, Mead does not expect this proceeding will have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition, liquidity or results of
operations of the Company.
A patent infringement proceeding entitled Riverwood International
-----------------------
Corporation v. The Mead Corporation was brought against Mead in the United
- -----------------------------------
States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Civil Action No.
1-94-CV-90 CAM) by Riverwood International Corporation. A second patent
infringement proceeding against Mead filed by Riverwood with the same title and
in the same court (Civil Action No. 97-CV-2767) had been stayed pending the
outcome of the first proceeding. The first patent was determined to be invalid
and final appeal was denied in May, 2000. The second proceeding is now active
and discovery involving Riverwood's `789 and `361 patents is proceeding. These
patents relate to a machine and a method for loading beverage containers such as
cans into paperboard cartons in a two-layer arrangement. The amount of revenues
subject to claims for infringement if the patents were deemed valid is also in
dispute. The company believes annual revenue subject to the claim for
infringement is less than one-half of one percent.
Mead has established reserves of approximately $40 million relating to
the aforementioned proceedings.
Additional information is included in Part I, Item 1,
"Business--Environmental Laws and Regulations," and Note R on pages 43 and 44.
Mead is involved in various other litigation and administrative
proceedings arising in the normal course of business, which, in the opinion of
management, after considering established reserves, is not expected to have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition, liquidity or results of
operations of Mead.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.
9
Executive Officers of the Company
The Executive Officers of Mead as of February 1, 2001, their ages,
positions and offices with Mead, and the principal occupation (unless otherwise
stated, position is with Mead) of such Executive Officers during the past five
years are as follows:
Name Age Position and Offices
---- --- --------------------
Raymond W. Lane 52 Executive Vice President since April, 1996;
prior to that Vice President, Operating
Officer since July, 1994.
Sue K. McDonnell 52 Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary since June, 1999; prior to that
Vice President, Deputy General Counsel
since November, 1996; prior to that Deputy
General Counsel since 1995.
Timothy R. McLevish 46 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
since December, 1999; prior to that Vice
President, Finance and Treasurer since
July, 1998; prior to that President of the
Specialty Paper Division since January,
1994.
Ian W. Millar 50 Executive Vice President since January,
2001 and President of the Mead Paper
Division since July, 1998; prior to that
President of the Mead Packaging Division
since January 1993.
A. Robert Rosenberger 56 Vice President, Human Resources since June,
1997; prior to that Vice President of Human
Resources of Mead Packaging Division since
August, 1994.
Jerome F. Tatar 54 Director; Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President since
November, 1997; prior to that President and
Chief Operating Officer since April, 1996;
prior to that Vice President, Operating
Officer since July, 1994.
Peter H. Vogel, Jr. 47 Vice President, Finance and Treasurer since
December, 1999; prior to that Vice
President - Business Affairs since
February, 1999; prior to that President of
the Zellerbach Division since January,
1997; prior to that President of the
Gilbert Paper Division since March, 1993.
Mark T. Watkins 47 Vice President, Technology since December,
2000; prior to that Vice President, Human
Resources and Organizational Development of
the Mead Paper Division since February,
1999; prior to that he was Vice President,
Michigan Operations of Mead Paper Division
since August 1997; prior to that he was
Resident Manager of Union Camp
Corporation's Eastover, South Carolina
mill since 1991.
All Executive Officers of Mead are elected annually by the Board of Directors.
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters
Mead's Common Shares are listed on the New York, Chicago and Pacific Stock
Exchanges, trading under the symbol "MEA." Information on market prices and
10
dividends is set forth below:
MARKET PRICES PER COMMON SHARE
- ------------------------------
2000 1999
---- ----
High Low High Low
---- ---
First quarter $45.1250 $28.1250 $33.312 $28.312
Second quarter 38.1250 25.1250 44.750 32.562
Third quarter 28.6875 21.6250 46.312 33.000
Fourth quarter 32.8125 21.1875 43.625 32.375
DIVIDENDS PAID PER COMMON SHARE
- -------------------------------
2000 1999
---- ----
First quarter $.17 $.16
Second quarter .17 .16
Third quarter .17 .16
Fourth quarter .17 .17
---- ----
Year $.68 $.65
==== ====
The number of Common shareowners of record as of March 5, 2001, was 39,166.
See Note I on page 36 for information regarding the amount of retained earnings
available for dividends.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Five-Year Data on Operations, Liquidity, Financial Condition and Capital
Resources
(all dollar amounts in millions, except per share amounts)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended December 31 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operations:
Net sales $4,368.1 $3,996.1 $3,944.2 $3,912.2 $3,436.9
Earnings from continuing operations 163.6 208.1 140.1 163.0 183.8
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
- assuming dilution 1.60 1.99 1.34 1.53 1.73
Liquidity:
Working capital 269.0 229.7 406.9 312.7 280.1
Current ratio 1.3 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.4
Assets:
Property, plant and equipment-net 3,269.9 3,357.4 3,372.7 3,273.8 3,084.6
Total assets 5,680.0 5,661.7 5,142.2 5,152.4 4,905.9
Capital:
Borrowed capital - long-term debt 1,322.8 1,333.7 1,367.4 1,428.0 1,239.7
Equity capital 2,397.8 2,430.8 2,252.0 2,288.5 2,246.4
--------------------------------------------------------------
Total capital $3,720.6 $3,764.5 $3,619.4 $3,716.5 $3,486.1
Borrowed capital as a percent of total capital 35.6% 35.4% 37.8% 38.4% 35.6%
Cash dividends per common share $ .68 $ .65 $ .64 $ .61 $ .59
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS
--------------------
OVERVIEW OF 2000
Sales revenue of $4.4 billion in 2000 increased 9% from $4.0 billion in 1999
primarily as a result of growth through acquisition in the Consumer and Office
11
Products segment. Earnings from continuing operations were $163.6 million in
2000 compared to $208.1 million in 1999. In 1999, earnings from continuing
operations included a $52.7 million after-tax gain on the sale of Mead's
ownership in a pulp and lumber operation. Excluding special items in both years,
earnings from continuing operations of $169.7 million or $1.66 per share in 2000
increased slightly from 1999 earnings of $165.6 million or $1.58 per share. The
increase was primarily a result of growth in Consumer and Office Products.
Within Mead's Paper segment, sales and earnings increased from the level of 1999
as higher sales volume and higher average selling prices for coated paper were
partially offset by reduced sales of uncoated paper, a nonstrategic product line
that comprises a small percentage of the Paper segment's business and is not an
integral part of the segment's growth plans. At the end of 1999 and in the first
half of 2000, the Paper division shut down some less-efficient production
capacity for uncoated paper. Near the end of 2000, the division acquired a
carbonless coating facility and took steps to consolidate the combined
carbonless operations. Average selling prices for coated paper in 2000 were
higher than in 1999, although prices declined after mid-year reflecting
continued growth in supply from imports and weaker demand as the economy slowed
near year-end. Inventories of coated paper were higher at year-end 2000 than
year-end 1999.
In the Packaging and Paperboard segment, sales revenue and earnings increased
slightly from the level of 1999 as higher selling prices for corrugating medium
offset a decline in packaging revenues and weaker markets for the segment's wood
products business. Shipments of medium were slightly lower than in 1999,
reflecting weaker demand after mid-year, which led to market-related mill
downtime. Mead Packaging division's sales and earnings declined from the prior
year due to weaker foreign currencies, primarily in Europe.
In the Consumer and Office Products segment, sales and earnings increased over
1999 with the first full year of sales of time management products from
AT-A-GLANCE, a business Mead acquired in late 1999. Sales of Mead's school
supplies increased as a result of an expanded product line and growth in Mexico.
Further growth was hindered by weaker overall sales reported by mass retailers
and a decline in volume of commodity-based school products resulting from
increased foreign competition. Integration following the major acquisition
continued on schedule.
Earnings Per Share Analysis
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continuing operations before special items $1.66 $1.58 $1.55
Special items (.06) .41 (.21)
------ ----- -----
Continuing operations 1.60 1.99 1.34
Discontinued operations (.20)
Change in accounting principle (.02)
------ ----- -----
Net earnings (assuming dilution) $1.58 $1.99 $1.14
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SPECIAL ITEMS, ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE CHANGE AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
In the second half of 2000, Mead shut down the Kalamazoo, Michigan, Consumer and
Office Products converting plant and the Atlanta, Georgia, container plant of
the Packaging and Paperboard segment. The cost of these two shutdowns amounted
to 6 cents per share ($9.5 million pretax) and included severance costs, asset
write-offs and other related expenses. These charges (see Note K to the
Financial Statements) were taken during the third and fourth quarters of 2000.
In late 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") published Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,
requiring companies affected by its provisions to report the impact on any
changes in sales, costs and related balance sheet amounts no later than the
fourth quarter of 2000. This bulletin was amended twice in 2000. Mead's
accounting practices for revenue recognition complied with the SEC's guidance in
virtually all respects. In several minor areas, however, adjustments were
required to comply with SEC guidance, the effect of which aggregated to 2 cents
12
per share ($2.4 million after tax) earnings reduction as of the beginning of
2000. This adjustment is reflected as the cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle.
During 1999, Mead sold several nonstrategic assets, including its 50% ownership
of Northwood Inc. of Canada for $240 million (Canadian) in cash and convertible
debentures of $77.5 million (Canadian). The assets of Northwood included a pulp
mill and lumber and plywood facilities. Mead recorded an after-tax gain of 50
cents per share ($82.3 million pretax) from the sale. Special items in 1999 also
included an after-tax charge of 11 cents per share ($18.9 million pretax) for
asset write-offs and severance costs related to the shutdown of four uncoated
paper machines at the company's paper mill in Rumford, Maine. The company had a
2 cents per share ($2.7 million pretax) gain in 1999 which represented a
reversal of an original charge to selling and administrative expenses in 1998
(see below). These special items totaled 41 cents per share in 1999 (see table).
These charges (see Note K to the Financial Statements) were taken during the
second and fourth quarters of 1999.
Also, during 1999, the company completed the sale of the merchandising unit of
its Packaging and Paperboard segment and a sawmill that was part of its Paper
segment. Proceeds from these sales were approximately the same as the carrying
values of the assets and, therefore, had no impact on earnings. Mead purchased a
small paper mill in County Devon, England, in the third quarter of 1999 and a
small school products business in Mexico late in the fourth quarter. In the
fourth quarter, Mead purchased the AT-A-GLANCE group of Cullman Ventures, Inc.
for approximately $540 million, which has become a part of the Consumer and
Office Products segment.
During 1998, Mead recorded a charge of 13 cents per share ($22 million pretax)
for an organizational change and work force reduction program that included
plans to eliminate 318 positions (see Note K to the Financial Statements). As a
result of lower severance outplacement costs, the company reversed 2 cents per
share ($2.7 million pretax) of the original charge to selling and administrative
expenses in the third quarter of 1999.
Special items during 1998 included organizational changes and related work force
reductions noted above, asset write-downs and asset sales. For asset
write-downs, the company recorded charges of 25 cents per share ($37.7 million
pretax). Asset sales resulted in gains of 17 cents per share ($28.3 million
pretax). Special items in 1998 totaled 21 cents per share.
Also, during 1998 Mead undertook a number of initiatives that included the sale
of its Distribution segment and related real estate for $288 million, which
resulted in a charge of 20 cents per share ($20.4 million after tax) (see Note N
to the Financial Statements). That charge is classified as "Discontinued
Operations."
Paper Segment
(all dollar amounts in millions)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sales $1,926.5 $1,882.7 $1,880.4
Earnings before income
taxes and special items 181.9 165.0 222.7
Special items (17.4) (16.4)
-------- -------- ---------
Earnings before income taxes $ 181.9 $ 147.6 $ 206.3
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sales revenue in the Paper segment increased slightly compared to 1999. Earnings
before special items improved 10% from 1999 primarily as a result of higher
average selling prices for coated paper.
Prices for coated paper fluctuated between 1998 and 2000 as a result of changes
in market supply and demand. In 1998, rising imports of coated paper from Europe
and Asia Pacific increased the overall supply in the U.S. market. Increased
supply led to a decline in selling prices in coated paper by the second half of
1998 that continued through the first half of 1999. Mead took market-related
downtime in the second half of 1998 and during the first three quarters of 1999
13
to better manage its inventory. Prices stabilized by the second half of 1999 and
strengthened near year-end 1999 and first quarter of 2000. However, selling
prices declined after mid-year 2000 as rising imports led to increased supply,
and demand weakened with a slowing in the U.S. economy. For the year, average
selling prices in 2000 were higher than in 1999, although prices at year-end
2000 fell below the level of year-end 1999.
In 1999, sales revenue in the Paper segment was essentially unchanged from 1998.
Earnings before special items decreased from 1998 primarily as a result of lower
selling prices for all major grades of paper.
Paper
- -----
Mead Paper division manufactures and sells coated paper for use by publishers of
books, magazines, catalogs and advertising materials and by commercial printers.
The division produces and sells carbonless copy paper for use in multi-part
forms. It also sells uncoated papers and market pulp. The division has three
mills located in Maine, Michigan and Ohio and carbonless coating facilities in
Ohio.
Division sales revenue was slightly lower than in 1999 on lower sales volume of
uncoated paper, a nonstrategic product line. Earnings improved over 1999 as a
result of a 3% increase in coated paper prices. Improvements in productivity
were offset by higher costs for energy and raw materials. Shipment volume of
coated paper increased 4% over 1999. Shipments of uncoated paper were much lower
following the permanent shutdown of four older paper machines in the fourth
quarter of 1999. Shipments of carbonless paper declined 4% from 1999, consistent
with a gradual decline in the market for multi-part business forms. Average
selling prices for carbonless paper were essentially unchanged from the prior
year.
The inventory level of finished goods, primarily coated paper, was approximately
30% higher at year-end 2000 than at year-end 1999. The increase resulted from
higher production levels of coated paper compared to 1999 when the division took
market-related downtime. While inventories increased during the first half of
2000, the overall level began to decline after mid-year.
During the year, the division improved manufacturing efficiency across its three
mills, rationalized product grade lines and completed the conversion of a former
uncoated paper machine to a pulp dryer. One older paper machine, which produced
base stock for carbonless paper, was permanently shut down, and another uncoated
paper machine was idled indefinitely. Production of base stock for carbonless
paper was moved to a larger, more efficient machine, displacing production of
uncoated paper. In the fourth quarter of 2000, as part of an effort to
consolidate carbonless paper operations, the division acquired the carbonless
coating facilities of a major business forms printer and signed a multi-year
sales agreement to supply the printer with carbonless paper. The agreement is
expected to increase overall sales volume. As a result of the acquisition and
consolidation of assets, Mead has increased its annual production capacity for
carbonless paper by 25% to 290,000 annual tons while reducing the number of
coaters, facilities and paper machines involved in producing carbonless
products. By consolidating facilities, the division expects to improve the
productivity of its operations and maintain sufficient production capacity to
meet customer needs.
In 1999, division sales volume was essentially unchanged from 1998 levels as
higher shipment volume was offset by lower selling prices for all grades of
paper. Earnings were lower as a result of a 7% decline in selling prices.
Approximately half of the decline in prices was offset by lower unit costs and
higher shipment volume.
Specialty Paper
- ---------------
Mead Specialty Paper division manufactures a variety of decorative and overlay
saturating papers for laminates used in furniture, flooring, countertops and
cabinets. It also produces a variety of specialty grades, including tape papers
and filter and friction papers for industrial and automotive applications. The
division operates a total of four mills, two in Massachusetts and one mill each
in New York and England.
14
Division sales increased over 1999 as a result of continued volume growth of
several specialty grades including wear-resistant overlay papers, filter and
decor papers. Earnings were slightly higher than in 1999 as a result of a 15%
increase in sales volume, partially offset by higher costs for purchased pulp
and energy and costs associated with integrating the County Devon, England, mill
acquired in 1999. Demand for wear-resistant overlay papers continued to grow in
North America, Europe and Asia Pacific, despite increased competition. Overall,
order backlogs slowed in the second half of the year. In response to higher
inventories, the division took market-related downtime in the fourth quarter of
2000.
In 1999, division sales increased over 1998 as a result of higher shipments of
several specialty grades including wear-resistant overlay papers, filter and
friction papers and tape papers. Earnings were slightly higher in 1999 than in
1998 as a result of a 13% increase in shipments.
Gilbert Paper
- -------------
Gilbert Paper division produces premium business correspondence papers and
premium text and cover papers at its mill in Wisconsin.
Division sales increased slightly over the level of 1999 as a result of higher
prices and improved sales mix. Overall sales volume was unchanged from the level
of 1999. The division's sales volume continued to grow in text and cover papers,
while volume declined for premium correspondence papers reflecting a gradual
decline in market demand for cotton-content papers. Results for the division
were lower as an increase in average selling prices of 3% was offset by an 8%
increase in operating costs. Inventory levels at year-end 2000 were slightly
higher than the prior year. The division took market-related downtime to balance
production with demand.
In 1999, the division's sales revenue declined from the level of 1998 as a
result of lower shipments due to weak market conditions and a strategic decision
to reduce production and sale of lower-margin products. Despite a 12% decline in
sales volume, earnings improved over 1998 as a result of a 7% increase in
average selling prices due to improved sales mix and an 11% decrease in costs.
Packaging and Paperboard Segment
(all dollar amounts in millions)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sales $1,612.2 $1,582.5 $ 1,564.6
Earnings before income
taxes and special items 177.4 169.2 153.8
Special items (3.4) .8 (11.3)
--------- --------- -----------
Earnings before income taxes $ 174.0 $ 170.0 $ 142.5
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sales and earnings in the Packaging and Paperboard segment increased compared to
1999 as higher selling prices for corrugating medium offset slightly lower sales
revenue in coated paperboard and packaging.
Selling prices for corrugating medium, which had declined throughout 1998,
strengthened from mid-year 1999 through mid-year 2000, before declining slightly
in the second half of 2000. Mead's average selling price for corrugating medium
in 2000 improved 28% over the average selling price in 1999. The industry
experienced stable demand and a reduction in containerboard supply in domestic
markets due to publicly announced permanent reductions in production capacity by
several companies following industry consolidation.
In 1999, sales revenue was essentially unchanged from 1998 levels as higher
sales volume and selling prices for corrugating medium offset lower sales
revenue in Mead's coated paperboard and packaging businesses. Earnings before
special items in 1999 increased 10% over 1998, primarily as a result of improved
pricing for medium.
15
Containerboard
- --------------
Mead Containerboard division produces corrugating medium at its mill in Alabama.
It also produces shipping containers at seven corrugating container plants.
Division sales revenue and earnings increased in 2000 over 1999 as a result of
higher selling prices for corrugating medium. Shipments of medium were slightly
lower than in 1999, reflecting a weakening in demand in the second half of 2000.
During the fourth quarter of 2000, the mill took 42,000 tons of market-related
production downtime to better manage its inventory levels. The inventory of
medium declined in the fourth quarter but ended the year higher than year-end
1999. The mill operated well throughout the year. Production volume was
unchanged from the prior year level, despite downtime taken late in the year.
Operating costs were higher in 2000, reflecting higher costs for energy,
chemicals and some raw materials. Costs for purchased recycled fiber declined
from prior year levels.
Prices for containers improved in 2000 over 1999 levels, while shipments of
containers declined. During 2000, the company announced plans to close its
container plant in Atlanta, Georgia, to improve profitability. The closing,
which reduced the number of Mead container plants to seven, resulted in a pretax
charge of $3.4 million in 2000.
In 1999, division sales revenue increased over 1998 as a result of higher
shipment volumes of corrugating medium. Earnings increased over 1998 as a result
of a 13% increase in shipment volume and a 15% increase in average selling
prices. Operating costs increased in 1999 over 1998 as a result of higher costs
for purchased recycled fiber and operating difficulties related to the start-up
of an expanded paper machine and chemical recovery system. The operating issues
were substantially resolved by year-end.
Coated Board
- ------------
Mead Coated Board division manufactures coated unbleached kraft paperboard for
use in multiple beverage packaging and folding cartons. The coated paperboard is
produced at the Mahrt mill near Phenix City, Alabama. Approximately 60% of the
paperboard production is used by Mead Packaging division's worldwide beverage
packaging business. The remainder is sold to folding carton manufacturers in
North America and Europe. The division also has two sawmills that produce lumber
products.
Sales volume of coated paperboard was essentially unchanged from 1999. Sales
volume to external folding carton customers increased in North America and
Europe, while volume sold to Mead's integrated packaging business declined
slightly. Division sales revenue was similar to the 1999 level, as an increase
in coated paperboard sales revenue offset a decline in both the pricing and
sales volume of wood products at the division's sawmill operations. Earnings for
the division declined from 1999 as a result of unfavorable foreign exchange
rates for the division's European business, an 11% decline in prices for wood
products, and higher energy-related costs. Consolidation among folding carton
customers and a growing supply of bleached, kraft and recycled paperboard for
packaging led to competitive pressures on pricing in 2000. The Mahrt mill
operated well during the year and the mill's production of coated paperboard
increased over 1999. The level of finished inventory was slightly higher than at
year-end 1999.
In 1999, division sales revenue was essentially unchanged from 1998. Earnings
increased slightly on a 2% increase in sales volume of paperboard and a 4%
increase in selling prices for lumber at the division's sawmill operations,
which offset slightly lower selling prices for coated paperboard.
Packaging
- ---------
Mead Packaging division is a leading worldwide supplier of multiple packaging
and packaging systems for the beverage and food markets. Customers include
worldwide consumer products companies serving these markets. The division is a
global packaging business with offices and facilities in more than 30 countries
worldwide.
16
Division earnings increased during 2000 at exchange rates similar to those of
1999. However, due to a strong U.S. dollar, actual sales and earnings declined
as the revenues from Mead's operations outside North America were translated
from weaker foreign currencies into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. The
volume of cartons sold in Europe, Mexico, Australia and Asia continued to grow
over prior years. That growth was offset by weaker volumes of soft-drink
packaging in North America and a decrease in beverage packaging volume in
Brazil. Customer consolidations, competitive pricing in some key markets and
slower growth rates in carbonated drinks characterized market conditions for the
Packaging business. Productivity improvements, combined with the reorganization
of several operations during 1999, helped offset higher costs for labor and
materials. The overall level of finished goods inventory was unchanged from
year-end 1999. The division continued to make improvements in carton design and
the placement of new packaging systems, primarily in markets outside North
America.
In 1999, sales volume of ongoing operations increased from 1998. However, due to
the sale of two small business units and a strong U.S. dollar, sales revenue at
actual exchange rates declined compared to 1998. Earnings decreased from 1998,
primarily due to the strong U.S. dollar which reduced earnings by approximately
$10 million.
Consumer and Office Products Segment
(all dollar amounts in millions)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sales $829.4 $530.9 $499.2
Earnings before income
taxes and special items 67.8 37.9 47.4
Special items (6.1) .1 (4.6)
------ ------ ------
Earnings before income taxes $ 61.7 $ 38.0 $ 42.8
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consumer and Office Products is a producer and distributor of:
. school supplies;
. time management products such as planners and calendars; and
. office products and related items.
Products are distributed through:
. mass retailers;
. office superstores;
. commercial stationers; and
. office products catalogs.
The product line and distribution channels were expanded with the acquisition in
November 1999 of AT-A-GLANCE and its portfolio of time management and office
products.
Sales revenue and earnings for the segment increased over 1999 primarily as a
result of the acquisition. In 1999, school products represented the majority of
segment sales. Following the acquisition, the segment's product base became more
diverse with school products making up less than half of segment sales. Sales
revenue from school products in 2000 increased over 1999 as a result of higher
selling prices, including an expanded line of value-added school products,
licensed products and products proprietary to Mead, and sales growth in the
Mexican market. Sales of commodity-based school products met increased pressure
from foreign competition. Further improvement in sales revenue during the
back-to-school selling season was hindered somewhat by lower overall sales
reported by mass retailers in the second half of the year reflecting a slowing
economy. The majority of sales of school products are sold through mass
retailers in the back-to-school selling season during the second and third
quarters of the year. Sales of time management products are made through office
superstores, commercial stationers and catalogs and occur primarily in the third
and fourth quarters of the year. Time management products include planners,
organizers, appointment books and desk and wall calendars. Sales of time
management products increased in 2000 as a result of a full year of sales of
17
AT-A-GLANCE products. Costs increased in 2000 for uncoated paper, a primary raw
material for some paper-based products such as tablets. The business was not
able to pass all of the increase on to customers due to foreign competition of
paper-based products.
During the year, the Consumer and Office Products segment completed the shutdown
of a converting plant in Kalamazoo, Michigan, as part of ongoing efforts to
improve overall productivity of its converting and distribution system.
Inventory and equipment from the plant were moved to other facilities. The
shutdown resulted in a $6.1 million pretax charge in 2000. During the year, the
integration of the AT-A-GLANCE acquisition continued on schedule. The segment
formed a new management organization with members from both the former school
and office products and AT-A-GLANCE organizations and consolidated some
marketing functions. The segment sold some time management products through mass
retail channels as a result of initial cross-marketing efforts. In 1999, sales
increased compared to 1998 as a result of the acquisition of AT-A-GLANCE late in
the year. In 1999, the segment expanded its manufacturing and presence in the
Mexican market by acquiring the assets of a distribution company that had sold
Mead's school supplies in the country for more than 10 years.
SELLING AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
- -----------------------------------
Selling and administrative expenses for 2000 of $493 million increased over
comparable amounts for 1999 and 1998. Of the increase, approximately $89 million
related to the results of the acquisitions in 1999. The acquisitions were
included for only a portion of the year in 1999. The remainder of the increase
in 2000 was a result of ongoing costs to implement an enterprise resource
planning ("ERP") system and general inflationary pressures. See a more detailed
discussion of the ERP system contained in the "Outlook" section of MD&A. Selling
and administrative costs in both 1999 and 1998 were $387 million. Included in
1998 expenses was a charge of $22 million associated with certain organizational
changes and a related reduction in Mead's work force. Excluding the effect of
this charge, the increase in selling and administrative expenses was $22 million
in 1999 from 1998, of which the majority was November and December 1999 expenses
from AT-A-GLANCE.
OTHER REVENUES
- --------------
Other revenues in 2000, 1999 and 1998 were $11 million, $97 million and $34
million, respectively. The most significant component of other revenue in 1999
was a pretax gain of $82 million on the sale of Mead's investment in Northwood
Inc., a Canadian producer of market pulp and various lumber products. Gains on
the sale of nonstrategic assets were $4 million in 1999 and $28 million in 1998.
Investment income was $8 million, $5 million and $6 million in 2000, 1999 and
1998, respectively.
INTEREST AND DEBT EXPENSE
- -------------------------
Interest and debt expense for 2000 was $121 million, an increase of $16 million
over the 1999 level of $105 million. A higher level of total average borrowings
was the primary driver of the increase. Expense levels for 1999 were lower than
the $109 million for 1998, despite the increase in the total amount of
borrowings at year-end 1999. During most of 1999, average debt levels were lower
than during 1998.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
----------------
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Mead's cash flows from operating activities were $468 million in 2000, compared
to $485 million in 1999 and $423 million in 1998. An overall increase in working
capital was the primary reason for the decline in 2000.
During 2000, Mead continued its stock repurchase program, acquiring 4.1 million
shares for $108 million. Repurchases in 1999 were 1.2 million shares for $43
18
million, and repurchases in 1998 were 2.6 million shares for $83 million. Cash
inflows from employee exercises of stock options in 2000 aggregated to $8
million, down considerably from the $48 million in 1999 and the $13 million in
1998.
During 1999, Mead spent approximately $570 million to purchase AT-A-GLANCE and
two other much smaller entities. These acquisitions were financed with available
funds and short-term borrowings. By the end of 1999, short-term borrowings were
reduced by cash proceeds from the sale of Northwood Inc. and other subsequent
cash flows from operations.
Mead's total debt (including notes payable and current maturities) at year-end
2000 was $1,536 million, down slightly from $1,555 million in 1999 and up from
$1,375 million in 1998. The acquisition of AT-A-GLANCE was the primary reason
for the increase in debt levels between 1998 and 1999. Mead's total debt as a
percentage of total capital was 39.0% at the end of 2000, compared with 39.0%
for 1999 and 37.9% for 1998.
Additional financing capability is afforded by a $300 million bank credit
agreement that expires in November 2001 and a $300 million credit agreement that
expires in November 2005. The bank credit agreements support $49 million of the
company's capital lease obligations and $61 million of its short-term
borrowings, leaving $490 million that can be borrowed. Both credit facilities
are undrawn. If the credit facilities were drawn, the interest rate would be
LIBOR plus 47.5 basis points (.475%).
At the end of 2000, Mead paid a fixed or capped rate on 69% of its debt and paid
a floating rate on the remaining amount. A change of 1% in the floating rate, on
an annual basis, would result in a change of 3 cents per share. The estimated
market value of long-term debt was $15.1 million less than book value at the end
of 2000. The average interest rate for the fixed and floating rate debt of the
company is 6.8%.
Working capital at the end of 2000 was $269 million, compared to $230 million
for 1999 and $407 million for 1998. The increase from 1999 was primarily
attributable to a $72 million increase in inventory, offset by increases in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The reduction from 1998 to 1999 was
due to a $213 million increase in notes payable and current maturities and a $46
million reduction in cash, offset by approximately $69 million of working
capital from the AT-A-GLANCE acquisition. Mead's current ratios at the end of
2000, 1999 and 1998 were 1.3, 1.2 and 1.6, respectively. The replacement values
of inventories exceeded their last-in, first-out ("LIFO") values by $183 million
at the end of 2000. Adjusted for LIFO, Mead's current ratio would be 1.4 at
year-end.
CAPITAL SPENDING
Mead's level of capital spending in 2000 of $206 million was below the level of
depreciation. Comparable amounts for 1999 and 1998 were $213 million and $384
million, respectively. A large portion of the 1998 spending related to
completion of the $224 million expansion and upgrade of the Stevenson, Alabama,
corrugating medium mill. That project added virgin pulp-making capabilities, a
wood fuel boiler and additional dryer capacity, increasing the mill's annual
capacity to 840,000 tons from 640,000 tons.
Capital spending projects in 2000 included completion of a pulp dryer at the
Maine paper mill and various equipment upgrades. In 1999, upgrade projects were
completed at the specialty paper mill in New York, the Ohio paper mill and the
coated paperboard mill in Alabama.
During 2001, Mead expects to spend no more than $250 million in capital
expenditures, which is less than the current level of depreciation. Funding is
expected to be internally generated. No purchases or expansion of facilities is
planned for 2001, and no projects are individually significant. However, Mead
reserves the right to pursue opportunities not known to it at this time.
EFFECTS OF INFLATION
The rate of general inflation remains at a low level and is not expected to have
a significant effect on results in 2001 except for energy-related costs. Costs
for energy, including natural gas, oil and electricity, and costs for certain
19
raw materials, such as purchased pulp, increased significantly in 2000. The
increase in these costs affected many of the company's businesses. Rising oil
prices affect costs for transportation, fuel oil and some petroleum-derived raw
materials.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEEDINGS
Mead has been notified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency
("USEPA") or by various state or local governments that it may be liable under
federal environmental laws or under applicable state or local laws with respect
to the cleanup of hazardous substances at six sites currently operated or used
by Mead. Mead is also currently named a Potentially Responsible Party ("PRP"),
or has received third-party requests for contributions under federal, state or
local laws with respect to at least 20 sites sold by Mead over many years or
owned by contractors used by Mead for disposal purposes. Some of the proceedings
are described in more detail in Part I, Item 3, "Legal Proceedings" of Form
10-K. There are other former Mead facilities and those of contractors that may
contain contamination or may have contributed to potential Superfund sites for
which Mead has not received any notice or claim. Mead's potential liability for
all these sites will depend upon several factors, including the extent of
contamination, the method of remediation, insurance coverage and contribution by
other PRPs. Although the costs that Mead may be required to pay for remediation
of all these owned and unowned sites is not certain at this time, Mead has
reserves of approximately $40 million related to current environmental
litigation and proceedings that it believes are probable and reasonably
estimable. These reserves were established after considering the number of other
PRPs, their ability to pay their portion of the costs, the volumetric amount, if
any, of Mead's contribution, and other factors. Expenses to be charged to this
reserve are not included in the anticipated capital expenditures for the next
three years stated in Part I, Item 1, "Business-Environmental Laws and
Regulations" of Form 10-K. Mead believes that it is reasonably possible that
costs associated with these sites may exceed current reserves by an amount that
could range from an insignificant amount to as much as $40 million. The estimate
of this range is less certain than the estimates upon which the reserves are
based.
In April 1998, USEPA promulgated regulations under the Clean Air Act and Clean
Water Act (the "Cluster Rules") designed to reduce air and water discharges of
specific substances from U.S. pulp and paper mills. The "Cluster Rules"
establish certain air emission and water discharge limits for various categories
of pulp and paper mills. To ensure compliance with these limits, affected
companies have been or will be required to make capital investments to install
new equipment, upgrade existing equipment or modify process operations. Most of
the compliance deadlines have passed or are approaching. Mead has substantially
completed the capital investments necessary under the Cluster Rules, with future
related capital costs estimated to be less than $5 million, an amount immaterial
to Mead's business. All three of Mead's bleached paper mills have eliminated
elemental chlorine from their bleaching operations and are in compliance with
effluent requirements of the pulp and paper Cluster Rules well in advance of the
regulatory deadlines.
Various states bordering the Great Lakes in 1997, including Michigan and Ohio,
adopted state regulations consistent with the Federal Great Lakes Initiative
("GLI"). These state regulations have been approved in large part by USEPA,
although some elements of each state's program have been disapproved and are
subject to change. However, Mead does not expect any significant additional
capital expenditures(beyond those previously stated in Part I, Item 1, "Business
- - Environmental Laws and Regulations" of Form 10-K) will be necessary to comply
with these regulations.
To reduce ozone-causing pollutants from large utility and industrial sources in
the Midwest and South, USEPA has issued a call for certain states, including
Alabama, Michigan and Ohio, to adopt more stringent emission controls on all or
some of the sources within their boundaries (the "NOx SIP Call"). Although legal
challenges to the NOx SIP Call have been filed, Alabama, Michigan and Ohio have
proposed new regulatory programs intended to satisfy the NOx SIP Call. As
proposed, a total allowable emissions level would be specified for each affected
facility, which could be satisfied through a variety of actions, ranging from
curtailing use of equipment to installing additional emissions control systems.
Alternatively, additional emissions allowances could be acquired through a form
of emissions trading with other emission sources. These state programs are not
final, and Mead has not determined what actions it will want or need to take to
20
assure compliance with these new programs. No new emission limitations or
standards are expected to take effect before 2004. Mead, at this time, does not
expect that any significant capital expenditures (beyond those previously stated
in Part I, Item 1, "Business - Environmental Laws and Regulations" of Form 10-K)
will be necessary in the next three years to comply with these regulations.
DERIVATIVE DISCLOSURE
The company enters into various hedging transactions governed by corporate
policies and procedures that are approved and regularly reviewed by the Finance
Committee of the Board of Directors.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, requires derivatives to be
recorded on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities, measured at fair value.
Gains or losses resulting from changes in fair value of the derivatives are
recorded depending upon whether the instruments meet the criteria for hedge
accounting. This Statement will be adopted effective January 1, 2001, and will
result in a cumulative after-tax reduction in net earnings of approximately
$10.4 million and a reduction in other comprehensive loss of $10.3 million in
the first quarter of 2001 (see Note A to the Financial Statements).
INTEREST RATES
Mead's objective is to reduce its interest expense through a blend of fixed and
floating interest rate instruments. The company primarily funds itself with
long-term debt having final maturities ranging from five to 50 years at date of
issue, a portion of which has variable interest rates, and with variable
interest rate commercial paper. The company uses interest rate swaps and caps in
managing its mix of fixed and floating rate debt.
In managing its interest rate risk, Mead assesses such risk by estimating the
potential increase in the fair market value of its debt portfolio that would
result from a parallel downward shift of the yield curve. The change in fair
market value is a reflection of the fixed and floating rate mix, as well as the
average maturity, of Mead's debt portfolio. Mead uses the portfolio valuation
models available from Bloomberg(TM) which use theoretical, as well as actual,
prices for instruments with similar characteristics, including embedded options
(e.g., puts or calls). A parallel downward shift of the yield curve of 100 basis
points would result in an increase in the market value of Mead's debt portfolio
of $82 million and $81 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
Mead has foreign-based operations, primarily in Canada, Mexico and Western
Europe, which accounted for approximately 13% of its 2000 net sales. In
addition, certain of Mead's domestic operations have sales to foreign customers.
In the conduct of its foreign operations, Mead also makes intercompany sales and
receives royalties and dividends denominated in many different currencies. All
of this exposes Mead to the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange
rates.
Flows of foreign currencies into and out of Mead's domestic operations are
generally stable and regularly occurring, and are recorded at fair market value
in Mead's financial statements. Mead's foreign currency management policy
permits Mead to enter into foreign currency hedges when these flows exceed a
threshold which is a function of these cash flows and forecasted annual net
income. During 2000, the company entered into foreign currency hedges to
partially offset the foreign currency impact of these flows on operating
earnings.
Mead also issues intercompany loans to its foreign subsidiaries in their local
currencies, exposing it to the effect of changes in spot exchange rates at loan
issue and loan repayment dates. Generally, Mead uses forward exchange contracts
with terms of less than one year to hedge these exposures. When applied to
Mead's derivative and other foreign currency sensitive instruments at December
31, 2000, a 10% adverse change in currency rates would not materially affect
Mead's financial position, annual results of operations or cash flows.
21
COMMODITIES
Mead is exposed to price changes in raw materials, components, and items
purchased for resale. The prices of some of these items can vary significantly
over time due to changes in the markets in which the company's many suppliers
operate. Mead's selling prices often change in a similar fashion, although often
to a greater or lesser degree. The company does use a limited amount of
financial instruments to manage its exposure to commodity prices. At year-end
2000, Mead had two swap transactions hedging future purchases of old corrugated
containers ("OCC") and corrugated medium sales totaling approximately $12
million over three years. The potential financial impact of these swaps was
assessed by modeling a two standard deviation movement in the price of these
commodities for the life of the transactions. These transactions are not
expected to have a material impact on Mead's financial position or annual
results of operations or cash flows based on the analysis. The hedging of future
OCC purchases aggregate to less than 1% of Mead's annual purchases of raw
materials.
OUTLOOK
Mead's operations throughout the world are affected by changes in supply and
demand, both of which are influenced by changes in foreign currency exchange
rates, interest rates, consumer confidence and other factors. While changes in
demand are generally gradual and track the rate of domestic economic activity,
new supply typically comes onto the market in large increments with the start-up
of new productive capacity. The result can be temporary periods of oversupply
that lead to price weakness, as in 1998 and 1999. Prices for several of Mead's
products improved in the first half of 2000. In the second half of the year,
however, weaker foreign currencies and slowing worldwide economies negatively
affected selling prices for many of Mead's products.
New capacity for paper and paperboard in the U.S. is expected to grow at a
slower rate over the next few years than during the late 1990s. New global
capacity in Europe, Asia Pacific and Canada has increasingly become a factor in
recent years. During 1998 and much of 1999, new global capacity led to increased
supply. Weaker markets in Asia Pacific and weaker foreign currencies relative to
the U.S. dollar led to an increase in imports into the United States. U.S.
producers attempted to reduce inventories by taking market-related downtime. As
a result, selling prices declined. In late 1999 and through the first three
quarters of 2000, the supply-demand balance improved, leading to some pricing
improvements for certain grades of paper and containerboard. However, in the
fourth quarter of 2000, demand began to subside and prices began to decline.
The impact of e-commerce to date appears to be additive to the traditional uses
of coated paper which include magazines, catalogs and advertising materials. The
overall market demand for carbonless copy paper used in multi-part business
forms continued to decline gradually in 2000 as it did in 1999 and 1998.
The sales by Mead's foreign operations are approximately 13% of overall sales,
with most occurring in the packaging and coated board businesses of the
Packaging and Paperboard segment and in the Consumer and Office Products
segment, primarily in Europe, Mexico and Canada. Fluctuations in European and
Canadian currencies can affect operating results for these segments. The impact
of currency fluctuations can affect the results of Mead's individual businesses.
Energy-related costs, specifically costs for natural gas, oil and purchased
electricity, increased by approximately 15% in 2000 over 1999. While the company
relies on self-generated sources for approximately half of its energy needs,
natural gas, oil and purchased electricity represent an important component of
the company's energy needs. Factors leading to the increase in energy prices
include reduced supply, growing demand and deregulation of the utility industry.
These factors are expected to continue to affect energy prices in 2001.
The company's businesses continue to show signs of a slowing economy and the
impacts of rising energy-related costs and a strong U.S. dollar. These factors
had a significant impact on the company's 2000 results, especially in the more
cyclical businesses of coated paper and containerboard. Looking forward to the
first half of 2001, weak market conditions are likely to affect these
businesses. To counter the impact of these factors, the company intends to
improve productivity, align production more closely to meet demand, reduce
discretionary spending, implement a hiring freeze and other cost controls, and
22
continue to keep capital spending at levels below that of depreciation.
During 2000, Mead continued the multi-year implementation of an enterprise
resource planning system across the company. Mead expects the technology and the
redesign of business processes will help achieve meaningful cost reductions and
enhanced operating efficiencies. Mead expects to spend approximately $125
million to implement its ERP system between 1998 and 2003. Through 2000, Mead
had incurred costs totaling approximately $76 million. These costs include
incremental amounts for hardware and software and costs for the redeployment of
company resources. The expenditures for this system will replace some
expenditures that would have been spent to upgrade or replace existing systems.
These costs do not include amounts incurred by operating divisions as they
implement the ERP system. Some of the ERP costs are being expensed as incurred.
Other costs, such as those for the purchase of systems, will be capitalized in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. From 1998 through
2000, approximately 64% of the costs were capitalized, and 36% were expensed.
When implementation is completed, the majority of costs are expected to be
expensed. Over the past few years, Mead assembled an implementation team,
developed a common format for the corporate-wide system and began a multi-year,
phased-in implementation program. The new system is fully operational at the
Coated Board division of the Packaging and Paperboard segment. The system is
partially installed at all the company's major mills, specifically the component
related to non-order management functions. In 2001, the implementations
currently in process will be completed at the three larger paper mills of the
Paper segment and the containerboard business of the Packaging and Paperboard
segment. Implementation at additional company divisions will follow in 2002 and
early 2003.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Forward-looking statements throughout this report are based upon current
expectations and include the statements in the section entitled "Outlook" and
such other statements preceded or followed by words such as "anticipates,"
"believes," "estimates," "expects," "hopes," "targets," or similar expressions.
For each of these statements we claim the protection of the safe harbor for
forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and
uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
. growth in supply of different sectors of the paper and forest products
industry, particularly in the U.S., Europe and Asia Pacific;
. demand for paper and paperboard in the U.S., Europe and Asia Pacific
markets;
. market prices for these products;
. fluctuations in foreign currency, primarily in Europe;
. the stability of financial markets;
. capacity spending levels in the industry;
. general business and economic conditions in the U.S., Europe, Asia
Pacific and Latin America;
. interest rates and their volatility;
. energy costs and availability;
. government actions;
. competitive factors; and
. opportunities that may be presented to and pursued by the company not
known at this time.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
See information in Item 7.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Financial Statements
Page
----
Financial Statements:
Independent Auditors' Report ............................................ 25
Statements of earnings .................................................. 26
Balance sheets .......................................................... 27
Statements of shareowners' equity ....................................... 28
23
Statements of cash flows ......................................... 29
Notes to financial statements .................................... 30-46
Supplementary Data
Selected quarterly financial data ................................ 47
24
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Board of Directors
The Mead Corporation
Dayton, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of The Mead Corporation and
consolidated subsidiaries (the "company") at December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the
related statements of earnings, shareowners' equity and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of The Mead Corporation and consolidated
subsidiaries at December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
As discussed in Note A to the financial statements, effective January 1, 2000,
the company changed its method of revenue recognition for provisions included in
certain sales agreements.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Dayton, Ohio
January 25, 2001
25
THE MEAD CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
- --------------------------------------------------
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
- ----------------------
Year Ended December 31 2000 1999 1998
(all amounts in millions, except per share amounts)
Net sales $ 4,368.1 $ 3,996.1 $ 3,944.2
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales (Note K) 3,529.6 3,328.4 3,256.3
Selling and administrative expenses (Note K) 493.1 387.4 387.5
-------------------------------------------
4,022.7 3,715.8 3,643.8
-------------------------------------------
Earnings from operations 345.4 280.3 300.4
Other revenues - net (Note L) 10.9 96.7 34.2
Interest and debt expense (121.0) (105.1) (109.0)
-------------------------------------------
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes 235.3 271.9 225.6
Income taxes (Note M) 82.5 98.5 83.7
-------------------------------------------
Earnings from continuing operations before equity in
net earnings (loss) of investees 152.8 173.4 141.9
Equity in net earnings (loss) of investees (Note D) 10.8 34.7 (1.8)
-------------------------------------------
Earnings from continuing operations 163.6 208.1 140.1
Discontinued operations (Note N) (20.4)
-------------------------------------------
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle 163.6 208.1 119.7
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (Note A) (2.4)
-------------------------------------------
Net earnings $ 161.2 $ 208.1 $ 119.7
===========================================
Earnings per common share - basic (Note A):
Earnings from continuing operations $ 1.61 $ 2.04 $ 1.36
Discontinued operations (.20)
-------------------------------------------
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle 1.61 2.04 1.16
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (.02)
-------------------------------------------
Net earnings $ 1.59 $ 2.04 $ 1.16
===========================================
Weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding 101.5 102.3 103.3
===========================================
Earnings per common share - assuming dilution (Note A):
Earnings from continuing operations $ 1.60 $ 1.99 $ 1.34
Discontinued operations (.20)
-------------------------------------------
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle 1.60 1.99 1.14
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (.02)
-------------------------------------------
Net earnings $ 1.58 $ 1.99 $ 1.14
===========================================
Weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding - assuming dilution 102.3 104.6 104.9
===========================================
See notes to financial statements.
26
THE MEAD CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
- --------------------------------------------------
BALANCE SHEETS
- --------------
December 31 2000 1999
(all dollar amounts in millions)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 29.4 $ 56.4
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$7.6 in 2000 and $8.1 in 1999 557.3 547.7
Inventories (Note C) 561.5 489.9
Deferred tax asset (Note M) 91.5 77.5
Other current assets 41.6 58.8
-------------------------------------
Total current assets 1,281.3 1,230.3
Investments and other assets (Notes B, D and O) 1,128.8 1,074.0
Property, plant and equipment, net (Note E) 3,269.9 3,357.4
-------------------------------------
Total assets $ 5,680.0 $ 5,661.7
-------------------------------------
LIABILITIES AND SHAREOWNERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Notes payable (Note G) $ 200.3 $ 186.2
Accounts payable (Note F) 269.1 266.1
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities (Notes F and R) 530.3 513.2
Current maturities of long-term debt (Note G) 12.6 35.1
-------------------------------------
Total current liabilities 1,012.3 1,000.6
Long-term debt (Notes G and Q) 1,322.8 1,333.7
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Notes Q and R)
Deferred items (Notes M and P) 947.1 896.6
Shareowners' equity (Notes I, J and T):
Common shares 147.4 153.0
Additional paid-in capital 125.2 121.6
Retained earnings 2,172.9 2,178.0
Other comprehensive loss (47.7) (21.8)
-------------------------------------
2,397.8 2,430.8
-------------------------------------
Total liabilities and shareowners' equity $ 5,680.0 $ 5,661.7
-------------------------------------
See notes to financial statements.
27
THE MEAD CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
- --------------------------------------------------
STATEMENTS OF SHAREOWNERS' EQUITY
- ---------------------------------
(all dollar amounts in Other
millions, except per share Comprehensive Comprehensive
amounts; all share Common Shares Additional Retained Loss Earnings
---------------------
amounts in thousands) Shares Amount Paid-In Capital Earnings (Note T) (Note T)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1997 103,885 $154.9 $ 53.5 $2,100.6 $ (20.5)
Net earnings 119.7 $ 119.7
Shares issued 587 .9 14.5
Shares purchased (2,642) (3.9) (1.7) (77.2)
Cash dividends -
$.64 a common share (66.2)
Foreign currency
translation
adjustment (15.0) (15.0)
Change in minimum
pension liability (net of
income tax benefit of
$4.5) (7.6) (7.6)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1998 101,830 151.9 66.3 2,076.9 (43.1) $ 97.1
============
Net earnings 208.1 $ 208.1
Shares issued 1,978 2.9 56.4
Shares purchased (1,229) (1.8) (1.1) (40.5)
Cash dividends -
$.65 a common share (66.5)
Foreign currency
translation
adjustment 17.2 (3.3)
Change in minimum
pension liability (net
of income taxes of $.5) .8 .8
Change in unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities (net of income
taxes of $1.8) (Note D) 3.3 3.3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1999 102,579 153.0 121.6 2,178.0 (21.8) $ 208.9
============
Net earnings 161.2 $ 161.2
Shares issued 360 .5 8.8
Shares purchased (4,071) (6.1) (5.2) (96.9)
Cash dividends -
$.68 a common share (69.4)
Foreign currency
translation
adjustment (11.4) (11.4)
Change in minimum
pension liability (net of
income tax benefit of
$.3) (.6) (.6)
Change in unrealized loss
on available-for-sale
securities (net of income
tax benefit of $7.4)
(Note D) (13.9) (13.9)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 2000 98,868 $147.4 $ 125.2 $2,172.9 $ (47.7) $ 135.3
===============================================================================
See notes to financial statements.
28
THE MEAD CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
- --------------------------------------------------
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
- ------------------------
Year Ended December 31 2000 1999 1998
(all dollar amounts in millions)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings $ 161.2 $ 208.1 $ 119.7
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and depletion of
property, plant and equipment 276.4 263.2 260.3
Depreciation and amortization of other assets 60.5 44.2 41.5
Deferred income taxes 22.0 11.9 30.5
Investees - earnings and dividends (1.1) (16.1) 16.3
Gain on sale of assets (86.3) (28.3)
Discontinued operations 20.4
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 2.4
Other (10.1) 23.0 8.9
Change in assets and liabilities, excluding
effects of acquisitions and dispositions:
Accounts receivable (25.5) (1.2) 17.1
Inventories (56.5) 34.0 (46.0)
Other current assets 17.2 7.4 (5.6)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 21.3 (3.6) (3.7)
Cash (used in) discontinued operations (8.5)
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by operating activities 467.8 484.6 422.6
------- ------- -------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures (205.9) (212.9) (384.0)
Additions to equipment rented to others (28.3) (26.8) (31.1)
Payments for acquired businesses, net of cash acquired (41.9) (559.0) (50.9)
Proceeds from sale of assets 185.2 342.2
Other (28.1) (33.0) (33.6)
------- ------- -------
Net cash (used in) investing activities (304.2) (646.5) (157.4)
------- ------- -------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Additional borrowings 10.0 15.0 160.5
Payments on borrowings (45.0) (23.4) (217.2)
Notes payable 14.1 186.2
Cash dividends paid (69.4) (66.5) (66.2)
Common shares issued 7.9 48.4 13.0
Common shares purchased (108.2) (43.4) (82.8)
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (190.6) 116.3 (192.7)
------- ------- -------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (27.0) (45.6) 72.5
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 56.4 102.0 29.5
------- ------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 29.4 $ 56.4 $ 102.0
------- ------- -------
See notes to financial statements.
29
THE MEAD CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
- --------------------------------------------------
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
- -----------------------------
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000, 1999 AND 1998
- --------------------------------------------
A - Significant Accounting Policies
CONSOLIDATION. The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of the
company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
transactions are eliminated. Investments in investees are stated at cost plus
the company's equity in their undistributed net earnings since acquisition.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS. The company considers all highly liquid investments
with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash
equivalents.
INVENTORIES. The inventories of finished and semi-finished products and raw
materials are stated at the lower of cost or market determined primarily on the
last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis. Stores and supplies are stated at average cost.
OTHER ASSETS. Included in other assets are goodwill, capitalized software,
equipment rented to others and other intangibles, which are being amortized
using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of three to 20
years. The company periodically reviews goodwill balances for impairment based
on the expected future cash flows of the related businesses acquired.
COMPUTER SOFTWARE COSTS. The company records software development costs in
accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants'
Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software
Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.
DEPRECIATION AND DEPLETION. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment and
amortization of capital leases and land improvements are calculated using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the properties. The
rates used to determine timber depletion are based on projected quantities of
timber available for cutting and are calculated annually. The company reviews
its long-lived assets balances whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If the sum
of the expected future undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount
of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized based on the amount by which the
carrying amount of the asset exceeds fair value.
INTEREST RATE AND FOREIGN EXCHANGE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS. Amounts currently due
to or from interest rate swap counterparties are recorded in interest expense in
the period in which they accrue. The premiums paid to purchase interest rate
caps, as well as gains or losses on terminated interest rate swap and cap
agreements, are included in long-term liabilities or assets and amortized to
interest expense over the shorter of the original term of the agreements or the
life of the financial instruments to which they are matched. Gains or losses on
foreign currency forward contracts are recognized currently through income and
generally offset the transaction losses or gains on the foreign currency cash
flows which they are intended to hedge.
ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES. The company records accruals for environmental costs
based on estimates developed in consultation with environmental consultants and
legal counsel in accordance with the requirements of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 5. The estimated costs to be incurred in closing
existing landfills, based on current environmental requirements and
technologies, are accrued over the expected useful lives of the landfills.
ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS. The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and the reported revenues and expenses during a period. Estimates
and assumptions are also used in the disclosures of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
REVENUE RECOGNITION. The company recognizes revenue when ownership risk passes,
30
which is generally when goods are shipped.
NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE. Net earnings per common share are computed by
dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during each year. The difference between earnings per common share
and earnings per common share (assuming dilution) is the result of outstanding
stock options.
STOCK OPTIONS. The company measures compensation cost for stock options issued
to employees using the intrinsic value based method of accounting in accordance
with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25.
RECLASSIFICATION. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform
to current year presentation. The company changed the presentation of its income
statement to include cost of sales and selling and administration expenses under
the heading of costs and expenses, eliminating the gross margin line. This
change conforms the company's presentation to more closely compare to that of
other companies in its industry. Additionally, in compliance with EITF 00-10,
Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs, the company reclassified to
revenue certain shipping and handling costs billed to customers that were
previously recorded as an offset to shipping and handling costs included in cost
of goods sold.
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE. In 2000, the Securities and
Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, Revenue
Recognition in Financial Statements, which addresses the timing of revenue
recognition. In response to SAB 101, the company undertook a review of its
revenue recognition practices and identified certain provisions included in a
limited number of sales arrangements that delayed the recognition of revenue
under SAB 101. During the fourth quarter 2000, the company changed its method of
accounting for the provisions included in these sales agreements to be in
accordance with SAB 101. The company has retroactively adopted SAB 101 as of
January 1, 2000, and has recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $2.4
million, net of tax of $1.3 million, in 2000 to reflect application of the new
accounting. The cumulative effect adjustment was computed based on revenue of
$15.9 million initially recognized in 1999 that was delayed to 2000 under SAB
101. The adoption of SAB 101 did not have a material impact on the net earnings
of 2000. In addition, there is no material change in pro forma results assuming
retroactive application of the change in accounting principle for 1999 and 1998.
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended,
requires derivatives to be recorded on the balance sheet as assets or
liabilities, measured at fair value. Gains or losses resulting from changes in
fair value of the derivatives are recorded depending upon whether the
instruments meet the criteria for hedge accounting. This Statement will be
adopted effective January 1, 2001, and will result in a cumulative after-tax
reduction in net earnings of approximately $10.4 million and a reduction in
other comprehensive loss of $10.3 million in the first quarter of 2001.
B - Acquisitions
On November 1, 1999, the company acquired the AT-A-GLANCE Group of Cullman
Ventures, Inc., a manufacturer of diaries, appointment books, calendars,
posters, organizers and planners, for approximately $540 million in cash. The
acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase, and the results of its
operations are reflected in the accompanying financial statements from the date
of acquisition. The acquisition resulted in goodwill of $265 million, which
reflects the final allocation of the purchase price in 2000. The goodwill is
being amortized on the straight-line method over 20 years.
Included in the purchase price allocation are charges of $6.6 million associated
with the shutdown and consolidation of operating facilities acquired as part of
the AT-A-GLANCE acquisition. The adjustment included $3.1 million for lease
termination costs and other contractual obligations which will derive no future
benefits, and $3.5 million for severance costs including medical, dental and
other personnel-related costs. The severance costs related to 146 salaried and
hourly employees, of whom 76 employees had left the company on or before
December 31, 2000. Payments of $1.4 million were made by December 31, 2000,
related to lease termination costs and other contractual obligations; the
remaining liability of $1.7 million is expected to be paid by the end of the
31
second quarter of 2001. Severance-related amounts of $1.8 million were paid by
December 31, 2000; the remaining severance-related liability of $1.7 million is
expected to be paid by the end of the second quarter of 2001.
To comply with disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles
related to acquisitions, the following unaudited pro forma combined results of
operations are presented as though the acquisition occurred at the beginning of
each period presented below. In management's opinion, the unaudited pro forma
combined results of operations are not indicative of the actual results that
would have occurred under the ownership and management of the company.
The following unaudited pro forma information includes adjustments for income
taxes, interest expense, depreciation and amortization expense to reflect the
accounting basis used to record the acquisition:
Year Ended December 31 1999 1998
(all dollar amounts in millions, except per share amounts)
Net sales $ 4,281.3 $ 4,274.1
=======================
Earnings from continuing operations $ 210.4 $ 141.9
=======================
Net earnings $ 210.4 $ 121.5
=======================
Earnings per common share - basic:
Earnings from continuing operations $ 2.06 $ 1.37
=======================
Net earnings $ 2.06 $ 1.17
=======================
Earnings per common share - assuming dilution:
Earnings from continuing operations $ 2.01 $ 1.35
-----------------------
Net earnings $ 2.01 $ 1.16
-----------------------
The company made additional acquisitions for approximately $42 million and $27
million in cash during 2000 and 1999, respectively. These acquisitions were also
accounted for as purchases.
C - Inventories
December 31 2000 1999
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Finished and semi-finished products $ 360.1 $ 297.1
Raw materials 117.2 113.7
Stores and supplies 84.2 79.1
---------------------
$ 561.5 $ 489.9
=====================
For purposes of comparison to non-LIFO companies, inventories valued at current
replacement cost would have been $182.8 million and $169.7 million higher than
reported at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
D - Investments and Other Assets
December 31 2000 1999
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Pension asset $ 304.4 $ 285.5
Goodwill and other intangibles (net of accumulated amortization of $34.1 in
2000 and $10.0 in 1999) 427.1 387.0
Cash surrender value of life insurance, less policy loans of $57.2 in 2000
and $50.6 in 1999 157.7 147.3
Equipment rented to others, at cost (net of accumulated depreciation
of $258.6 in 2000 and $265.4 in 1999) 65.3 69.4
Convertible debentures (including unrealized loss of $16.2 in 2000 and
unrealized gain of $5.1 in 1999) 47.6 69.4
Capitalized software (net of accumulated amortization of $11.6 in 2000
and $11.9 in 1999) 53.8 37.6
Investment in investees 31.0 28.3
Other 41.9 49.5
-----------------------
$ 1,128.8 $ 1,074.0
=======================
32
During 1999, the company sold its 50%-owned investment in Northwood Inc. (see
Note L). The company's remaining principal investees are the 30% ownership
interest in a limited partnership that operates the cogeneration facility
located at the Rumford, Maine, paper mill and the 50% ownership interest in
Northwood Panelboard Company, an oriented strand board mill in Bemidji,
Minnesota. The company received dividends and partnership distributions of $15.5
million, $27.1 million and $20.3 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
The convertible debentures have a par value of $77.5 million in Canadian
dollars. They are classified as available-for-sale securities and are carried at
fair value with unrealized gains or losses, net of tax, reported in other
comprehensive loss. Fair value of the securities is based on an independent
valuation.
The securities are convertible to common shares of the issuer at any time,
redeemable by the issuer beginning in November 2002 and mature in November 2006.
E - Property, Plant and Equipment
December 31 2000 1999
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Property, plant and equipment, at cost:
Land and land improvements $ 159.1 $ 156.0
Buildings 642.9 638.3
Machinery and equipment 4,733.0 4,646.0
Construction in progress 107.4 82.9
------------------------
5,642.4 5,523.2
Less accumulated amortization and depreciation (2,762.6) (2,547.0)
------------------------
2,879.8 2,976.2
Timber and timberlands, net of timber depletion 390.1 381.2
------------------------
Property, plant and equipment, net $ 3,269.9 $ 3,357.4
========================
F - Current Liabilities
December 31 2000 1999
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Accounts payable:
Trade $ 206.7 $ 220.2
Outstanding checks 62.4 45.9
=====================
$ 269.1 $ 266.1
=====================
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities:
Accrued wages $ 105.5 $ 108.0
Accrued rebates and allowances 111.1 99.0
Taxes, other than income 33.2 40.2
Accrued interest 37.1 36.8
Other current liabilities 243.4 229.2
---------------------
$ 530.3 $ 513.2
=====================
33
G - Debt
December 31 2000 1999
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Capital lease obligations $ 285.9 $ 287.4
Variable-rate Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, due from 2001
through 2033, average effective rate 4.0% 165.4 165.4
8-1/8% debentures, face amount of $150.0, due 2023 (effective rate 8.4%) 148.1 148.0
7-1/8% debentures, face amount of $150.0, due 2025 (effective rate 7.4%) 147.4 147.3
7.35% debentures, face amount of $150.0, due 2017 (effective rate 7.4%) 148.7 148.6
6.84% debentures, face amount of $150.0, due 2037 (effective rate 7.0%) 148.7 148.4
7.55% debentures, face amount of $150.0, due 2047 (effective rate 7.7%) 143.9 143.7
6.60% notes, face amount of $100.0, due 2002 (effective rate 6.9%) 99.6 99.3
Medium-term notes, 7.3% to 9.8%, face amount of $45.5 in 2000 and
$78.5 in 1999, due from 2002 through 2020 (effective rate 9.9%) 44.5 76.8
Other 3.2 3.9
----------------------
1,335.4 1,368.8
Less current portion 12.6 35.1
----------------------
$1,322.8 $1,333.7
======================
Capital lease obligations consist primarily of Industrial Development Revenue
Bonds and Notes with an average effective rate of 4.9%. The variable-rate
Industrial Development Revenue Bonds are supported by letters of credit. The
interest rates on the variable-rate tax-exempt bonds closely follow the
tax-exempt commercial paper rates. Notes payable represent short-term borrowings
with a weighted-average interest rate of 6.6%.
The 8-1/8% and 7-1/8% debentures are callable by the company at approximately
103% beginning in 2003. The 6.84% debentures can be put to the company at par
value in 2007.
The company has an unused $300 million bank credit agreement that extends until
November 2005 and an unused $300 million bank credit agreement that expires
November 2001. These agreements support $49.5 million of the company's capital
lease obligations and $61.0 million of notes payable. They contain restrictive
covenants and require commitment fees in accordance with standard banking
practice. The company has the ability to borrow up to $489.5 million pursuant to
these agreements at December 31, 2000.
Maturities of long-term debt for the next five years are $12.6 million in 2001,
$135.3 million in 2002, $.7 million in 2003, $6.7 million in 2004 and $.4
million in 2005.
The company has guaranteed obligations of certain affiliated operations and
others totaling $26.9 million at December 31, 2000. In addition, the company has
a 50% interest in a partnership with Kimberly-Clark Corporation, which has
borrowed $300 million under a loan agreement with a syndicate of banks, which
matures in 2003. The loan, one-half of which has been guaranteed by the company,
may be prepaid at any time either in cash or by delivery of notes receivable
from Georgia-Pacific Corporation held by the partnership as part of the
consideration from the 1988 sale of Brunswick Pulp and Paper Company, a former
affiliate. It is not practicable to estimate the fair value of the above
guarantees; however, the company does not expect to incur losses as a result of
these guarantees.
H - Financial Instruments
The company uses various derivative financial instruments as part of an overall
strategy to manage exposure to market risks associated with interest rate and
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The company uses foreign currency
forward contracts to manage the foreign currency exchange rate risks associated
with its international operations. The company utilizes interest rate swap and
cap agreements to manage its interest rate risks on its debt instruments,
including the reset of interest rates on variable-rate debt. The company does
not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
The risk of loss to the company in the event of nonperformance by any
counterparty under derivative financial instrument agreements is not considered
significant by management. All counterparties are rated A or higher by Moody's
34
and Standard and Poor's. Although the derivative financial instruments expose
the company to market risk, fluctuations in the value of the derivatives are
mitigated by expected offsetting fluctuations in the matched instruments.
As part of an overall strategy to maintain an acceptable level of exposure to
the risk of interest rate fluctuation, the company has developed a targeted mix
of fixed-rate and cap-protected debt versus variable-rate debt. To efficiently
manage this mix, the company may utilize interest rate swap, cap and option
agreements to effectively convert the debt portfolio into an acceptable
fixed-rate, capped-rate and variable-rate mix.
Under interest rate swap agreements, the company agrees with other parties to
exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed-rate and
variable-rate interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed-upon
notional principal amount. The company utilizes interest rate cap agreements to
limit the impact of increases in interest rates on its floating rate debt. The
interest rate cap agreements require premium payments to counterparties based
upon a notional principal amount. Interest rate cap agreements entitle the
company to receive from the counterparties the amounts, if any, by which the
selected market interest rates exceed the strike rates stated in the agreements.
The fair values of the interest rate swap and cap agreements are estimated using
quotes from brokers and represent the cash requirement if the existing
agreements had been settled at year-end. Selected information related to the
company's interest rate swap and cap agreements is as follows:
Swap Agreements Cap Agreements
December 31 2000 1999 2000 1999
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Notional amount $ 84.3 $ 114.2 $ 50.0 $ 50.0
==============================================
Fair value $ (.5) $ (3.1) $ $
Carrying amount .3 (1.5) .1 .1
----------------------------------------------
Net unrecognized gain (loss) $ (.8) $ (1.6) $ (.1) $ (.1)
==============================================
The company utilizes foreign currency forward contracts to reduce exposure to
exchange rate risks primarily associated with transactions in the regular course
of the company's international operations. The forward contracts establish the
exchange rates at which the company will purchase or sell the contracted amount
of specified foreign currencies at a future date. The company utilizes forward
contracts which are short-term in duration (generally one month) and receives or
pays the difference between the contracted forward rate and the exchange rate at
the settlement date. The major currency exposures hedged by the company are the
Canadian dollar, British pound, Japanese yen and Euro. Selected information
related to the company's foreign currency forward contracts is as follows:
Foreign Currency
Forward Contracts
December 31 2000 1999
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Notional amount $ 110.6 $ 239.7
=====================
Fair value $ .6 $ 6.9
Carrying amount .6 6.9
---------------------
Net unrecognized gain (loss) $ $
=====================
The fair value of the company's long-term debt is estimated based on quoted
market prices for the same or similar issues or on current rates offered to the
company for debt of the same remaining maturities. The fair value of long-term
debt was $1,307.7 million and $1,295.0 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999,
respectively, and the related carrying amounts were $1,322.8 million and
$1,333.7 million, respectively. The carrying amount of the notes payable and the
current maturities of long-term debt are reasonable estimates of their fair
value.
35
At December 31, 2000 and 1999, the company held short-term investments which are
included in cash and cash equivalents. The carrying amount of these short-term
investments is a reasonable estimate of fair value. See Note D for disclosure
regarding the investment in convertible debentures.
I - Shareowners' Equity
The company has authorized 300 million no par common shares. The company has
outstanding authorization from the Board of Directors to repurchase up to 10
million common shares of which 4.1 million have been repurchased at December 31,
2000.
Under a Rights Agreement, each outstanding common share presently has one right
attached which trades with the common share. Generally, the rights become
exercisable and trade separately 10 days after a third party acquires 20% or
more of the common shares or commences a tender offer for a specified percentage
of the common shares. In addition, the rights become exercisable if any party
becomes the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the outstanding common shares and
is determined by the Board of Directors to be an adverse party. Upon the
occurrence of certain additional triggering events specified in the Rights
Agreement, each right would entitle its holder (other than, in certain
instances, the holder of 20% or more of the common shares) to purchase common
shares of the company (or, in certain circumstances, cash, property or other
securities of the company) having a value of $100 for $50, the initial exercise
price. The rights expire in 2006 and are presently redeemable at $.005 per
right. At December 31, 2000, there were 110.8 million common shares reserved for
issuance under this plan.
The Board of Directors has approved termination benefits for certain key
executives and a severance plan for all other salaried employees and established
a Benefit Trust in connection with the company's unfunded supplemental
retirement plan, incentive compensation plans and supplements, deferred
compensation plans and supplements, former directors retirement plan, excess
earnings benefit plans, directors capital accumulation plan, executive capital
accumulation plan, Section 415 excess benefit plan and executive severance
agreements to preserve the benefits earned thereunder in the event of a change
in control of the company. These plans would be required to be immediately
funded upon occurrence of a triggering event (including a potential change in
control or actual change in control).
The company has preferred shares authorized but unissued as follows: 61,500
undesignated cumulative preferred, par value $100; 20 million undesignated
voting cumulative preferred, without par value; 20 million cumulative preferred,
without par value; and 295,540 cumulative second preferred, par value $50.
At December 31, 2000, there was $845.9 million available for common dividends,
which represents the maximum amount of additional indebtedness that can be
incurred solely to pay common dividends while remaining in compliance with
certain debt covenants.
J - Stock-Based Compensation Plans
Officers and key employees have been granted stock options under various
stock-based compensation plans. There are 11.1 million shares reserved for
issuance under the 1991 and 1996 Stock Option Plans. The exercise price of all
options equals the market price of the company's stock on the date of the grant.
The options and rights have a maximum term of 10 years and vest after one year
or three years. The company's Stock Option Plans also allow for the acceleration
of exercisability of all outstanding stock options immediately prior to the
first purchase of shares in a tender offer; shareholder approval of a merger or
consolidation; significant changes in beneficial ownership; or a significant
change in the composition of the board of directors.
Options to purchase 3.6 million shares are accompanied by limited rights which
may be exercised in lieu of the option under certain circumstances only during
certain 30 day periods following tender offers; shareholder approval of a merger
or consolidation; significant changes in beneficial ownership; or a significant
change in the composition of the board of directors (a "Change in Control
Event"). A limited right is exercisable only if the related option is
exercisable. The range of exercise prices associated with options accompanied by
limited rights is $13.31
36
to $41.66. If a Change in Control Event would occur the company would be
required to account for the limited rights under variable plan accounting and
record compensation expense equal to the excess of the company's current stock
price above the exercise price of the limited right. If a Change in Control
Event had occurred on December 31, 2000, the company would have recorded
compensation expense under variable plan accounting of approximately $20.6
million, which also reflects the cash payments the company would have been
required to make if all in the money limited rights were exercised.
Options to purchase 515,000 shares issued under the 1996 Stock Option Plan are
accompanied by a feature that allows option holders who exercise their stock
option and hold the common share they received at exercise to receive an
additional stock option grant with an exercise price at the then-current market
price. Options granted with this feature are accounted for as a fixed award.
A Restricted Stock Plan provides for the issuance of restricted common shares to
certain employees and to directors who are not officers or employees of the
company. Restricted stock issued to directors is expensed when awarded. Other
than annual grants to directors, restricted stock is issued from the plan as
payment under the company's incentive compensation plan. The incentive
compensation is expensed as earned and paid annually with a combination of cash
and restricted stock. The number of restricted shares awarded to individual
participants is based upon the portion of the incentive compensation liability
payable in restricted stock divided by the company's stock price at the date of
grant. These shares are restricted for periods of six months to eight years. At
December 31, 2000, 3,000 common shares were issued and outstanding under the
plan. There are 645,000 shares reserved for issuance under this plan. There were
86,000, 39,000 and 7,000 shares granted in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively, at
a weighted-average price of $32.08, $29.99 and $29.24, respectively.
The following table summarizes activity in the company's stock-based
compensation plans:
(all share amounts in thousands) 2000 1999 1998
Weighted- Weighted- Weighted-
Average Average Average
Exercise Exercise Exercise
Shares Price Shares Price Shares Price
Outstanding at beginning of year 8,442 $ 27.95 8,574 $ 26.68 7,480 $ 24.62
Granted 1,210 31.27 1,954 30.59 1,734 34.11
Exercised (295) 19.49 (2,021) 24.98 (604) 22.12
Canceled (190) 31.33 (65) 31.89 (36) 32.97
------ ------ -------
Outstanding at end of year 9,167 $ 28.59 8,442 $ 27.95 8,574 $ 26.68
====== ====== =======
Exercisable at year-end 7,785 $ 27.99 6,343 $ 27.05 6,739 $ 24.77
====== ====== =======
Weighted-average fair value of
options granted during the year
using the extended binomial
option-pricing model $ 9.48 $ 8.58 $ 10.56
Weighted-average assumptions used for grants:
Expected dividend yield 2% 2% 2%
Expected volatility 29% 25% 29%
Risk-free interest rate 6.6% 5.2% 5.6%
Expected life of option (in years) 6.0 6.0 6.0
The following table shows various information about stock options outstanding at
December 31, 2000:
(all share amounts in thousands)
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------
Weighted-
Number Average Weighted- Number Weighted-
Outstanding at Remaining Average Exercisable at Average
December 31, Contractual Exercise December 31, Exercise
Range of Exercise Prices 2000 Life (in years) Price 2000 Price
$13.31 - $18.32 401 .8 $ 16.82 401 $ 16.82
21.75 - 29.82 6,011 5.7 27.28 5,930 27.27
30.22 - 43.41 2,755 8.1 33.17 1,454 34.01
----------- -----------
$13.31 - $43.41 9,167 6.2 $ 28.59 7,785 $ 27.99
=========== ===========
37
Total compensation costs charged to earnings from continuing operations before
income taxes for all stock-based compensation awards were not significant in
2000, 1999 and 1998. Had compensation costs been determined based on the fair
value method of SFAS No. 123 for all plans, the company's net earnings and
earnings per common share would have been reduced to the following pro forma
amounts:
Year Ended December 31 2000 1999 1998
Net earnings (in millions):
As reported $ 161.2 $ 208.1 $ 119.7
================================
Pro forma $ 153.0 $ 198.4 $ 108.7
================================
Earnings per common share - assuming dilution:
As reported $ 1.58 $ 1.99 $ 1.14
================================
Pro forma $ 1.50 $ 1.90 $ 1.04
================================
K - Asset Write-downs and Employee Termination Costs
During 2000, the company recorded a pretax charge of $9.5 million in cost of
sales associated with the shutdown and disposal of one Consumer and Office
Products location and the shutdown of one Packaging and Paperboard location. The
charges included $1.3 million for transferring equipment to other locations,
$6.8 million for severance costs including medical, dental and other benefits,
and an additional $1.4 million in depreciation expense. Machinery and equipment
was transferred to various Consumer and Office Products and Packaging and
Paperboard locations and expensed as incurred. The severance costs related to
269 salaried and hourly employees, of whom 259 employees had left the company on
or before December 31, 2000. Substantially all severance-related amounts not
paid by December 31, 2000, are expected to be paid by the end of the first
quarter of 2001. Of the total charge, $6.4 million was recorded in the third
quarter and $3.1 million in the fourth quarter. In accordance with SFAS No. 121,
the estimated useful lives of certain equipment at the Packaging and Paperboard
location were reviewed and updated to reflect the shutdown of this location
resulting in $1.4 million of additional depreciation in the third and fourth
quarters.
During 1999, the company recorded a pretax charge of $18.9 million ($17.5
million in cost of sales and $1.4 million in selling and administrative
expenses) associated with the shutdown and disposal of four uncoated paper
machines at the Rumford, Maine, paper mill. The charge included $13.5 million
for asset write-downs and contractual obligations and $5.4 million for severance
costs including medical, dental and other benefits. A review for impairment in
accordance with SFAS No. 121 was performed and resulted in recognition of a
$10.6 million impairment charge to adjust the carrying amount of machinery and
equipment and related spare parts included in stores and supplies inventory to
their estimated fair values. Also included in the $13.5 million charge is $2.6
million to write off an investment in a joint venture as a result of the
permanent decline in its value. The joint venture sold products manufactured on
the affected machines. A charge of $.3 million was recorded related to certain
contractual obligations which will derive no future benefits. The severance
costs related to 113 salaried and hourly employees who left the company and were
paid by the end of the first quarter of 2000. Of the total charge, $15.6 million
was recorded in the second quarter and $3.3 million in the fourth quarter.
In 1998, the company recorded a pretax charge of $37.7 million primarily in cost
of sales for asset write-downs and other charges. The charges were comprised of
a $10.4 million reserve for stores and supplies inventory; $10.4 million for the
write-off of capitalized costs related to unimplemented software in development
abandoned as a result of the decision to implement an enterprise resource
planning computer system; an $8.2 million charge related to the Japanese
packaging operation; $4.6 million for the write-off and disposal of certain
plant equipment that was replaced by new equipment at the Packaging and
Paperboard segment's mill in Stevenson, Alabama; $2.9 million for the write-off
of a capital project in process that was not undertaken as a result of market
changes; and a special assessment of $1.2 million related to customs issues.
The reserve for stores and supplies was recorded upon the completion of a study
38
in the second quarter of 1998 to determine the future utility of obsolete and
excess replacement parts that are used to support the maintenance of plant
machinery and equipment in the Paper and Packaging and Paperboard segments. The
study identified the specific items which were to be disposed of and the company
is holding those items for disposal. The reserve adjusted those items identified
to their net realizable value, and the company commenced a disposal program at
that time. All items were disposed of and the related reserve was utilized for
its intended purpose by the end of the first quarter of 2000.
As a result of the deteriorating economic environment in Japan and poor
operating performance by the Japanese packaging operation, a charge was recorded
in 1998 to write down certain inventory and to reflect the impairment of
property, plant and equipment and goodwill. The fair value of the fixed assets
and goodwill and the related write-down in value was determined based on
management's assessment of the future cash flows of the operations.
In the third quarter of 1998, the company adopted a plan to make organizational
changes and reduce its work force, and recorded a charge of $22.0 million for
employee severance and related costs in selling and administrative expenses.
This plan involved terminating 318 domestic employees, primarily salaried, and
was communicated to affected employees in the third quarter of 1998. The charge
covered severance payments and medical, dental and other benefits. Pursuant to
this plan, 291 people left the company, with the remainder of the planned
terminations not occurring as a result of placement of affected employees in
other open positions within the company. As a result of fewer people being
terminated, lower severance benefits paid than estimated and less utilization of
outplacement benefits by terminated employees, the company reversed $2.7 million
of the original charge to selling and administrative expenses in the third
quarter of 1999.
The following is a summary related to the severance charges:
2000 1999 1998
(all dollar amounts in millions) Severance Severance Severance
Charge Charge Charge
Charge recorded $ $ $ 22.0
Used for intended purpose (12.1)
-------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 1998 9.9
Charge recorded 5.4
Used for intended purpose (2.7) (7.2)
Charge reversed (2.7)
-------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 1999 2.7
Charge recorded 6.8
Used for intended purpose (5.5) (2.7)
-------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 2000 $ 1.3 $ $
=====================================
The total charges (credits) by segment for asset write-downs and employee
termination costs are as follows:
Year Ended December 31 2000 1999 1998
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Paper $ $ 17.4 $ 28.2
Packaging and Paperboard 3.4 (.8) 25.2
Consumer and Office Products 6.1 (.1) 4.6
Corporate and other (.3) 1.7
----------------------------------
$ 9.5 $ 16.2 $ 59.7
==================================
39
L - Other Revenues - Net
Year Ended December 31 2000 1999 1998
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Investment income $ 8.1 $ 5.4 $ 6.4
Gain on sale of Northwood 82.3
Gain on sale of assets 4.0 28.3
Other 2.8 5.0 (.5)
----------------------------------
$ 10.9 $ 96.7 $ 34.2
==================================
During the fourth quarter of 1999, the company sold its 50%-owned investment in
Northwood Inc. for $77.5 million of convertible debentures in Canadian dollars
(fair value of $63.8 million in U.S. dollars at the sale date) and approximately
$163.8 million of cash and recognized a gain of $82.3 million.
The 1998 gain on sale of assets is comprised of $11.8 million on the sale of
timberland, $13.9 million related to the sale of nonstrategic packaging
businesses and $2.6 million on the sale of an undeveloped mill site in
Tennessee.
40
M - Income Taxes
The principal current and noncurrent deferred tax assets and (liabilities) are
as follows:
December 31 2000 1999
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Deferred tax liabilities:
Accelerated depreciation for tax purposes $ (586.6) $ (564.8)
Nontaxable pension asset (115.7) (108.5)
Deferred installment gain (47.5) (47.5)
Other (50.6) (64.3)
-----------------------
(800.4) (785.1)
Deferred tax assets:
Tax credit carryforwards 40.6
Compensation and fringe benefits accruals 76.5 67.9
Postretirement benefit accrual 53.5 52.9
Loss provisions and other expenses not
currently deductible 68.6 72.2
Other 44.3 30.1
-----------------------
242.9 263.7
-----------------------
Net deferred liability $ (557.5) $ (521.4)
=======================
Included in the balance sheets:
Current assets - deferred tax asset $ 91.5 $ 77.5
Deferred items (649.0) (598.9)
-----------------------
Net deferred liability $ (557.5) $ (521.4)
=======================
The significant components of income tax expense are as follows:
Year Ended December 31 2000 1999 1998
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Currently payable:
Federal $ 50.9 $ 33.3 $ 9.8
Federal alternative minimum tax 2.1 11.1
State and local 4.7 5.3 3.3
Foreign 10.7 54.4 13.4
-----------------------------------------
66.3 95.1 37.6
Change in deferred income taxes 15.6 14.2 26.0
-----------------------------------------
81.9 109.3 63.6
Allocation to partnership earnings (5.8) (8.5) (5.7)
Allocation to discontinued operations 21.3
Allocation to cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle (1.3)
Allocation to other comprehensive loss 7.7 (2.3) 4.5
-----------------------------------------
$ 82.5 $ 98.5 $ 83.7
-----------------------------------------
The following table summarizes the major differences between the actual income
tax provision attributable to continuing operations and taxes computed at the
federal statutory rates:
Year Ended December 31 2000 1999 1998
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Federal taxes computed at statutory rate $ 82.4 $ 95.2 $ 79.0
State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit 3.0 3.4 2.9
Impact related to difference in tax rates for foreign operations 1.2 3.1 2.1
Other (4.1) (3.2) (.3)
-----------------------------------------
Income taxes $ 82.5 $ 98.5 $ 83.7
-----------------------------------------
Effective tax rate 35.1% 36.2% 37.1%
-----------------------------------------
Earnings from operations of foreign subsidiaries were $26.8 million, $20.0
million and $31.6 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. At December 31,
2000, no domestic income taxes have been provided on the company's share of the
undistributed net earnings of overseas operations due to management's intent to
reinvest such amounts indefinitely. Those earnings totaled $127.3 million,
including foreign currency translation adjustments. The aggregate amount of
unrecognized deferred tax liability is approximately $6.7 million at December
31, 2000.
41
N - Discontinued Operations
In 1998, the company sold its Distribution segment, Zellerbach, and related real
estate for $288.0 million. Revenues of the Distribution segment were $965.0
million in 1998. The 1998 loss from discontinued operations of $20.4 million was
comprised of $6.0 million of losses from operations, net of income tax benefit
of $3.1 million, and a $14.4 million loss on the sale (including the loss on
operations during the phase-out period of $3.2 million), net of income tax
benefit of $18.2 million.
O - Pension Plans
The company has pension plans that cover substantially all employees. Pension
benefits for bargaining employees are primarily based upon years of credited
service. Benefits for salaried and most other non-bargaining employees are based
upon years of service and the employee's average final earnings. The company's
funding policy is to contribute amounts to the plans sufficient to meet or
exceed the minimum requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Summary information for all of the company's plans is as follows:
December 31 2000 1999
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Change in the projected benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year $ (812.0) $ (854.4)
Plan obligation assumed (30.2)
Service cost (23.6) (24.8)
Interest cost (62.8) (53.8)
Actuarial gain (loss) (48.0) 66.9
Benefits paid 89.8 101.8
Plan amendments (12.6) (16.2)
Termination adjustment due to benefit enhancements (1.7) (2.1)
Curtailment adjustment .7 .8
---------------------------
Projected benefit obligation at end of year (870.2) (812.0)
---------------------------
Change in the plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year 1,131.3 1,026.8
Plan assets assumed 38.1
Actual return on plan assets 54.8 165.2
Employer contributions 3.3 3.0
Benefits paid (89.8) (101.8)
---------------------------
Fair value of plan assets at end of year 1,099.6 1,131.3
---------------------------
Plan assets in excess of projected benefit obligation 229.4 319.3
Reconciliation of financial status of plans to amounts recorded in the
company's balance sheets:
Unamortized prior service cost 49.5 41.9
Unrecorded effect of net (gain) loss arising from differences between
actuarial assumptions used to determine periodic pension expense
and actual experience 11.3 (82.6)
Unamortized plan assets in excess of plan liabilities (overfunding)
at January 1, 1986 - to be recognized as a reduction of future years'
pension expense (5.8) (9.6)
Adjustment for minimum pension liability (13.2) (12.3)
---------------------------
Net pension asset $ 271.2 $ 256.7
===========================
Amounts recognized in the company's balance sheets consist of:
Pension asset $ 304.4 $ 285.5
Other current liabilities (33.2) (28.8)
Other assets 1.3 1.5
Other comprehensive loss 7.4 6.8
Benefit obligation discount rate 7.25% 8.00%
===========================
Rate of compensation increase (for pay-related plans only) 5.25% 5.25%
===========================
The total projected benefit obligation for the company's pension plans includes
$49.8 million and $40.3 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively, of
the unfunded plans, of which $33.2 million and $28.8 million represent the
accumulated benefit obligation.
42
The components of net pension (income) for all pension plans are as follows:
Year Ended December 31 2000 1999 1998
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Service cost, benefits earned during the year $ 23.6 $ 24.8 $ 22.0
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 62.8 53.8 50.7
Expected return on plan assets (99.3) (90.4) (86.7)
Amortization of prior service cost 3.8 2.6 2.8
Amortization of unrecognized net (gain) loss .6 6.6 (.3)
Amortization of net transition asset (3.8) (6.4) (7.9)
Termination loss 1.7 3.6
Settlement (gain) loss (1.2) 13.3
Curtailment (gain) loss (.1) .4
---------------------------------
Net pension (income) (11.9) (9.0) (2.1)
Less - net pension expense allocated to discontinued operations 7.4
---------------------------------
Net pension (income) - continuing operations $(11.9) $ (9.0) $ (9.5)
=================================
The plan assets consist primarily of common stocks and fixed income securities.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets used in determining net
pension income was 9% in all years.
The company's pension plans require the allocation of excess plan assets to plan
members if the plans are terminated, merged or consolidated following a change
in control (as defined) of the company opposed by the Board of Directors.
Amendment of these provisions after such a change in control would require
approval of plan participants.
The company also has 401(k) plans that cover substantially all U.S. employees.
Expense for company matching contributions under these plans was approximately
$11.9 million in 2000, $11.1 million in 1999 and $11.9 million in 1998.
P - Postretirement Benefits Other than Pension
The company funds certain health care benefit costs principally on a
pay-as-you-go basis, with retirees paying a portion of the costs. Certain
retired employees of businesses acquired by the company are covered under other
health care plans that differ from current plans in coverage, deductibles and
retiree contributions.
Summary information on the company's plans is as follows:
December 31 2000 1999
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Change in the projected benefit obligation:
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at beginning of year $(121.5) $(119.7)
Plan obligation assumed (11.2)
Service cost (4.0) (3.9)
Interest cost (8.9) (7.5)
Plan amendments 10.6
Actuarial gain (loss) (3.7) 12.3
Benefits paid 7.7 8.5
--------------------------
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at end of year (119.8) (121.5)
--------------------------
Change in the plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year 8.1 10.1
Actual return on plan assets .2 .9
Employer contributions 6.7 5.6
Benefits paid (7.7) (8.5)
--------------------------
Fair value of plan assets at end of year 7.3 8.1
--------------------------
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation in excess of plan assets (112.5) (113.4)
Reconciliation of financial status of plans to amounts recorded in the
company's balance sheets:
Unrecorded effect of net (gain) arising from differences between actuarial
assumptions used to determine periodic postretirement
expense and actual experience (30.2) (25.9)
--------------------------
Accrued postretirement benefit cost - included in deferred items $(142.7) $(139.3)
==========================
Benefit obligation discount rate 7.25% 7.75% - 8.00%
==========================
43
The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost are as follows:
Year Ended December 31 2000 1999 1998
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Service cost, benefits attributed to employee service
during the year $ 4.0 $ 3.9 $3.7
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation 8.9 7.5 7.6
Expected return on plan assets (.6) (.8) (.7)
Curtailment gain (4.7)
Amortization of unrecognized net (gain) (.5) (.5) (.7)
--------------------------------
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost $11.8 $10.1 $5.2
================================
Included in net periodic postretirement benefit cost in 1998 is a curtailment
gain of $4.7 million allocated to the company's discontinued operations.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets used in determining the net
periodic postretirement benefit cost was 8.0% in each year. The assumed health
care cost trend rate used in measuring the accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation in 2000 was 8.0% declining by 1.0% per year to an ultimate rate of
5.0%. The assumed health care trend rates used in 1999 and 1998 were 9.0% and
7.4%, respectively, declining by 1.0% per year and .8% per year, respectively.
If the health care cost trend rate assumptions were increased or decreased by
1.0%, the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at December 31, 2000,
would be increased or decreased by 8.6% and 8.4%, respectively. The effect of
this change on the sum of the service cost and interest cost components of net
periodic postretirement benefit cost for 2000 would be an increase or decrease
of 11.3% and 10.3%, respectively.
Q - Leases
At December 31, 2000, future minimum annual rental commitments under
noncancelable lease obligations are as follows:
Capital Operating
Leases Leases
Year Ending December 31:
(all dollar amounts in millions)
2001 $ 13.1 $ 30.9
2002 13.1 23.3
2003 13.1 17.1
2004 13.1 12.0
2005 13.1 9.3
Later years through 2033 595.8 38.3
---------------------
Total minimum lease payments 661.3 $ 130.9
=======
Less amount representing interest (375.4)
-------
Capital lease obligations $ 285.9
=======
The majority of rent expense is for operating leases which are for office,
warehouse and manufacturing facilities and delivery, manufacturing and computer
equipment. A number of these leases have renewal options. Rent expense was $74.9
million, $63.3 million and $51.7 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
R - Litigation and Other Proceedings
The company is involved in various litigation generally incidental to normal
operations, as well as proceedings regarding equal employment opportunity
matters, among others. The company is involved in investigations regarding
customs that may result in payments by the company ranging from an insignificant
amount to as much as $15 million; however, no liability has been recorded
relating to this matter because an obligation is not viewed as probable. The
company has also been identified as a potentially responsible party ("PRP") in
at least 20 environmental proceedings. These potential environmental liabilities
are essentially Superfund-type remediation liabilities. Superfund is a strict
liability statute, therefore, PRPs at Superfund sites theoretically may be
liable for the entire cost associated with designing and implementing remedial
actions as well as subsequent monitoring and other related costs. While it is
not possible to determine the ultimate liability, if any, in all of these
matters, Mead's
44
experience with respect to these types of sites, has been that it alone has not
been held liable for the total remedial costs at any or all of the sites where
it has been identified as a PRP. Furthermore, consistent with this experience
and the long history of implementation of the Superfund program, Mead does not
believe it will be held liable in this regard in the future. Even if this
unlikely situation resulted, Mead would pursue its rights to contribution from
other PRPs based on the proportionate levels of liability. In assessing its
potential liability at Superfund sites, Mead relies upon a variety of factors,
including past litigation experience at such sites, assessment of the ability of
other PRPs to pay and an evaluation of the company's likely share of exposure at
each site. Since Superfund's existence, Mead has been involved in numerous sites
in varying degrees and under varying circumstances. Many of those sites have
been remediated or are nearing completion. Throughout this time, Mead has been
regularly evaluating in the normal course of business its potential liability at
these various sites. The company has established reserves of approximately $40
million relating to environmental liabilities, including those related to
previously discontinued operations, which it believes are probable and
reasonably estimable. The company believes that it is reasonably possible that
costs associated with these sites may exceed current reserves by an amount that
could range from an insignificant amount to as much as $40 million. The estimate
of this range is less certain than the estimates upon which reserves are based.
In order to establish this range, assumptions less favorable to the company
among those outcomes that are considered reasonably possible were used. In the
opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel and after
considering established reserves, the resolution of pending litigation and
proceedings is not expected to have a material effect on the financial
condition, results of operations or liquidity of the company.
S - Additional Information on Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31 2000 1999 1998
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest $ 119.4 $ 106.1 $ 111.3
Less amount capitalized (1.6) (2.8) (6.3)
----------------------------------
Interest, net of amount capitalized $ 117.8 $ 103.3 $ 105.0
----------------------------------
Income taxes $ 76.7 $ 56.3 $ 31.8
----------------------------------
T - Other Comprehensive Loss
The difference between net earnings and comprehensive earnings relates to the
changes in foreign currency translation adjustment, additional minimum pension
liability and unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities.
Accumulated other comprehensive loss was comprised of the following:
Year Ended December 31 2000 1999
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Foreign currency translation adjustment $ (29.7) $ (18.3)
Additional minimum pension liability (7.4) (6.8)
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities (10.6) 3.3
---------------------
$ (47.7) $ (21.8)
---------------------
The 1999 foreign currency translation adjustment is comprised of $17.2 million
of foreign currency translation adjustment arising during 1999 less a $20.5
million reclassification adjustment for foreign currency translation adjustment
included in gain on sale of assets.
U - Segment Information
Industry Segments
The company classifies its businesses into three industry segments. The Paper
45
operations manufacture and sell printing, writing, carbonless copy, publishing
and specialty paper primarily to domestic publishers, printers and converters.
The Packaging and Paperboard operations manufacture and sell beverage and food
packaging materials, corrugated shipping containers and paperboard to those
markets primarily located in the United States with other operations conducted
in Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific. The Consumer and Office Products
operations are conducted predominantly in North America and manufacture and
distribute school, office and dated material products to retailers and
commercial distributors.
The company evaluates performance based on earnings from continuing operations
before income taxes and equity in net earnings of investees. The accounting
policies of the segments are the same as those described in the significant
accounting policies (Note A).
The Paper and the Packaging and Paperboard reportable segments are aggregations
of operating segments. The Paper segment includes Mead Paper, Specialty Paper
and Gilbert Paper. The Packaging and Paperboard segment includes Mead Coated
Board, Mead Packaging and Mead Containerboard.
Year Ended December 31 2000 1999 1998
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Net sales:
Industry segments:
Paper $ 1,926.5 $ 1,882.7 $ 1,880.4
Packaging and Paperboard 1,612.2 1,582.5 1,564.6
Consumer and Office Products 829.4 530.9 499.2
------------------------------------
Total $ 4,368.1 $ 3,996.1 $ 3,944.2
====================================
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes:
Industry segments:
Paper $ 181.9 $ 147.6 $ 206.3
Packaging and Paperboard 174.0 170.0 142.5
Consumer and Office Products 61.7 38.0 42.8
Corporate and other (1) (182.3) (83.7) (166.0)
------------------------------------
Total $ 235.3 $ 271.9 $ 225.6
====================================
Depreciation, depletion and amortization:
Industry segments:
Paper $ 122.1 $ 120.2 $ 116.8
Packaging and Paperboard 146.5 150.5 160.9
Consumer and Office Products 40.8 16.2 9.1
Corporate and other 27.5 20.5 15.0
------------------------------------
Total $ 336.9 $ 307.4 $ 301.8
====================================
Identifiable assets:
Industry segments:
Paper $ 2,206.3 $ 2,114.9 $ 2,181.3
Packaging and Paperboard 1,861.9 1,887.0 1,935.9
Consumer and Office Products 767.1 803.0 229.8
Intersegment Elimination (2.8) (4.9) (1.4)
Corporate and other (2) 847.5 861.7 796.6
------------------------------------
Total $ 5,680.0 $ 5,661.7 $ 5,142.2
====================================
Capital expenditures:
Industry segments:
Paper $ 91.6 $ 82.3 $ 178.4
Packaging and Paperboard 92.3 92.4 169.9
Consumer and Office Products 8.3 14.7 10.6
Corporate and other 13.7 23.5 25.1
------------------------------------
Total $ 205.9 $ 212.9 $ 384.0
====================================
(1) Corporate and other includes the following:
Year Ended December 31 2000 1999 1998
Other revenues $ 9.9 $ 96.4 $ 11.2
Interest expense (121.0) (105.1) (109.0)
Other expenses (71.2) (75.0) (68.2)
---------------------------------
$(182.3) $ (83.7) $ (166.0)
=================================
(2) Corporate and other consists primarily of cash and cash equivalents,
46
property, plant and equipment, investments and other assets.
Geographic Areas
The company has sales from foreign subsidiaries primarily in Canada, Europe,
Latin America and Asia Pacific. No individual foreign geographic area is
significant to the company relative to total net sales, earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes or identifiable assets.
47
The following represents net sales and total assets of the company's foreign
subsidiaries:
Year Ended December 31 2000 1999 1998
(all dollar amounts in millions)
Net sales:
Europe $ 292.2 $ 300.1 $ 312.8
Canada 156.3 143.5 144.4
Asia Pacific 75.1 63.4 48.6
Latin America 58.1 47.1 46.6
----------------------------------
Total $ 581.7 $ 554.1 $ 552.4
==================================
Assets:
Europe $ 216.2 $ 218.1 $ 230.2
Canada 47.6 49.6 50.5
Asia Pacific 42.3 44.8 39.4
Latin America 49.6 33.4 35.1
----------------------------------
Total $ 355.7 $ 345.9 $ 355.2
==================================
48
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) (all dollar amounts in millions,
except per share data)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Year
Net sales:
2000 (2) $953.6 $1,151.4 $1,218.2 $1,044.9 $4,368.1
1999 (3) 909.7 1,055.3 1,032.5 998.6 3,996.1
1998 (3) 875.6 1,091.9 1,056.7 920.0 3,944.2
Gross profit:
2000 (4) 177.0 245.0 242.5 174.0 838.5
1999 147.2 169.3 163.8 187.4 667.7
1998 169.6 188.0 188.9 141.4 687.9
Earnings from continuing operations:
2000 (4) 23.2 63.9 59.8 16.7 163.6
1999 22.9 44.8 50.8 89.6 208.1
1998 33.6 40.2 35.4 30.9 140.1
Earnings before cumulative effect of accounting change:
2000 (4) 23.2 63.9 59.8 16.7 163.6
1999 22.9 44.8 50.8 89.6 208.1
1998 30.6 15.2 35.4 38.5 119.7
Net earnings:
2000 (4) 20.8 63.9 59.8 16.7 161.2
1999 22.9 44.8 50.8 89.6 208.1
1998 30.6 15.2 35.4 38.5 119.7
Per common share - basic: (1)
Earnings from continuing operations:
2000 (4) .22 .62 .59 .17 1.61
1999 .22 .44 .50 .87 2.04
1998 .32 .39 .34 .30 1.36
Discontinued operations:
1998 (.03) (.24) .07 (.20)
Earnings before cumulative effect of accounting change:
2000 (4) .22 .62 .59 .17 1.61
1999 .22 .44 .50 .87 2.04
1998 .29 .15 .34 .37 1.16
Cumulative effect of accounting change:
2000 (5) (.02) (.02)
Net earnings:
2000 .20 .62 .59 .17 1.59
1999 .22 .44 .50 .87 2.04
1998 .29 .15 .34 .37 1.16
Per common share - assuming dilution: (1)
Earnings from continuing operations:
2000 (4) .22 .62 .59 .17 1.60
1999 .22 .43 .48 .86 1.99
1998 .32 .38 .34 .30 1.34
Discontinued operations:
1998 (.03) (.24) .07 (.20)
Earnings before cumulative effect of accounting change:
2000 (4) .22 .62 .59 .17 1.60
1999 .22 .43 .48 .86 1.99
1998 .29 .14 .34 .37 1.14
Cumulative effect of accounting change:
2000 (5) (.02) (.02)
Net earnings:
2000 (4) .20 .62 .59 .17 1.58
1999 .22 .43 .48 .86 1.99
1998 .29 .14 .34 .37 1.14
Cash dividends per common share:
2000 .17 .17 .17 .17 .68
1999 .16 .16 .16 .17 .65
1998 .16 .16 .16 .16 .64
49
(1) The number of shares used in the calculation of per share data is
computed based on quarterly averages; therefore, the sum of individual
earnings per share may not equal the annual computation.
(2) Quarterly amounts for the first three quarters of 2000 have been restated
from that previously reported in the company's Form 10-Q to reflect the
retroactive adoption of SAB 101, as of January 1, 2000, and the
reclassification to revenue of certain shipping and handling costs billed
to customers that were previously recorded as an offset to shipping and
handling costs included in costs of goods sold to comply with EITF 00-10.
1st Qtr 2000 2nd Qtr 2000 3rd Qtr 2000
------------ ------------ ------------
Net sales previously reported $ 915.6 $ 1,095.9 $ 1,150.1
SAB 101 restatement (11.6) (1.9) 9.4
EITF 00-10 reclassification 49.6 57.4 58.7
--------------------------------------------
$ 953.6 $ 1,151.4 $ 1,218.2
--------------------------------------------
(3) To comply with EITF 00-10, quarterly amounts for the fourth quarters of
1999 and 1998 have been restated from that previously reported to reflect
the reclassification to revenue of certain shipping and handling costs
billed to customers that were previously recorded as an offset to shipping
and handling costs included in costs of goods sold.
1st Qtr 1999 2nd Qtr 1999 3rd Qtr 1999 4th Qtr 1999
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Net sales - Previously reported $ 863.2 $ 1,004.8 $ 982.2 $ 949.3
----------------------------------------------------------
Net sales - As reported $ 909.7 $ 1,055.3 $ 1,032.5 $ 998.6
----------------------------------------------------------
1st Qtr 1998 2nd Qtr 1998 3rd Qtr 1998 4th Qtr 1998
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Net sales- Previously reported $ 839.0 $ 1,050.9 $ 1,009.3 $ 873.0
----------------------------------------------------------
Net sales - As reported $ 875.6 $ 1,091.9 $ 1,056.7 $ 920.0
----------------------------------------------------------
50
(4) Quarterly amounts for the first three quarters of 2000 have been restated
from the previously reported in the company's Form 10-Q to reflect the
retroactive adoption of SAB 101, as of January 1, 2000.
1st Qtr 2000 2nd Qtr 2000 3rd Qtr 2000
------------ ------------ ------------
Gross profit - Previously reported $ 179.9 $ 245.5 $ 240.1
------------------------------------------
Gross profit - As reported $ 177.0 $ 245.0 $ 242.5
------------------------------------------
Earnings from continuing operations - Previously reported $ 25.1 $ 64.2 $ 58.3
------------------------------------------
Earnings from continuing operations - As reported $ 23.2 $ 63.9 $ 59.8
------------------------------------------
Earnings before cumulative effect of accounting change - Previously reported $ 25.1 $ 64.2 $ 58.3
------------------------------------------
Earnings before cumulative effect of accounting change - As reported $ 23.2 $ 63.9 $ 59.8
------------------------------------------
Net earnings - Previously reported $ 25.1 $ 64.2 $ 58.3
------------------------------------------
Net earnings - As reported $ 20.8 $ 63.9 $ 59.8
------------------------------------------
Per common share - basic:
Earnings from continuing operations - Previously reported $ .24 $ .62 $ .58
------------------------------------------
Earnings from continuing operations - As reported $ .22 $ .62 $ .59
------------------------------------------
Earnings before cumulative effect of accounting change - Previously reported $ .24 $ .62 $ .58
------------------------------------------
Earnings before cumulative effect of accounting change - As reported $ .22 $ .62 $ .59
------------------------------------------
Net earnings - Previously reported $ .24 $ .62 $ .58
------------------------------------------
Net earnings - As reported $ .20 $ 62 $ 59
------------------------------------------
Per common share - assuming dilution:
Earnings from continuing operations - Previously reported $ .24 $ .62 $ .57
------------------------------------------
Earnings from continuing operations - As reported $ .22 $ .62 $ 59
------------------------------------------
Earnings before cumulative effect of accounting change - Previously reported $ .24 $ .62 $ .57
------------------------------------------
Earnings before cumulative effect of accounting change - As reported $ .22 $ .62 $ .59
------------------------------------------
Net earnings - Previously reported $ .24 $ .62 $ .57
------------------------------------------
Net earnings - As reported $ .20 $ .62 $ .59
------------------------------------------
(5) Adjustment of $(.02) from that previously reported in the company's first
quarter 2000 Form 10-Q to reflect the retroactive adoption of SAB 101, as
of January 1, 2000.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Information pursuant to this item is incorporated herein by reference to pages 3
through 6 and 24 of the Company's Proxy Statement, definitive copies of which
were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") on March
9, 2001. Information concerning executive officers is also included in Part I of
this report following Item 4.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information pursuant to this item is incorporated herein by reference to
pages 9 through 23 of the Company's Proxy Statement (excluding the "Report of
Audit Committee" and "Report of Compensation Committee on Executive
Compensation" on pages 11 through 16 and the "Performance Graph" on page 21),
definitive copies of which were filed with the Commission on March 9, 2001.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Information pursuant to this item is incorporated herein by reference to
pages 9 through 11 of the Company's Proxy Statement, definitive copies of which
were filed with the Commission on March 9, 2001.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
51
Information pursuant to this item is incorporated herein by reference to
pages 24 and 25 of the Company's Proxy Statement, definitive copies of which
were filed with the Commission on March 9, 2001.
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) 1. Financial Statements
The financial statements of The Mead Corporation and consolidated
subsidiaries are included in Part II, Item 8.
2. Financial Statement Schedule
The information required to be submitted in Schedules I through V for The
Mead Corporation and consolidated subsidiaries has either been shown in the
financial statements or notes thereto, or is not applicable or required under
rules of Regulation S-X, and, therefore, those schedules have been omitted.
3. Exhibits
(3) Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws:
(i) Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant adopted
May 28, 1987 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).
(ii) Regulations of the Registrant, as amended April 25, 1996
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).
(4) Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including
indentures:
(i) Restated Rights Agreement dated as of November 9, 1996
between Registrant and BankBoston, N.A., as Rights Agent,
(incorporated herein by reference to Registrant's Form 8-A, dated
November 13, 1996), as amended November 1, 1997 (incorporated by
reference to Registrant's Form 8-A/A dated November 3, 1997), as
amended December 7, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Registrant's
Form 8-A/A dated December 15, 1999); as amended and restated February
16, 2000, (incorporated by reference in Registrant's Form 8-A/A dated
March 6, 2000).
(ii) Indenture dated as of July 15, 1982 between the Registrant
and Bankers Trust Company, as Trustee, First Supplemental Indenture
dated as of March 1, 1987, Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of
October 15, 1989 and Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of November
15, 1991 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4) (ii) to Registrant's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997).
(iii) Indenture dated as of February 1, 1993 between Registrant
and The First National Bank of Chicago, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit (4) (iii) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997).
(iv) Indenture dated as of October 20, 1997 between Registrant
and Citibank, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4(g) of Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20,
1997).
The total amount of securities authorized under other long-term debt
instruments does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Registrant
and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. A copy of each such
instrument will be furnished to the Commission upon request.
(10) Material Contracts:
(i) Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of November 10, 2000
with Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, Bank One, NA, Bank of
52
America, N.A., and ten other banks (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2000).
(ii) 364-Day Credit Agreement dated November 10, 2000 with
Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, Bank One, NA, Bank of
America, N.A., and ten other banks (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2000).
(iii) Amended Board Purchase Agreement dated as of January 4,
1988 among the Registrant, Georgia Kraft Company and Inland Container
Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(iv) to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997).
(iv) Indemnification Agreement dated as of January 4, 1988 among
the Registrant, Mead Coated Board, Inc., Temple-Inland Inc., Inland
Container Corporation I, Inland Container Corporation, GK Texas Holding
Company and Georgia Kraft Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
(10)(v) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997).
(v) Lease Agreement between The Industrial Development Board of
the City of Phenix City, Alabama and Mead Coated Board, Inc., dated as
of December 1, 1988, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
(10)(vi) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997).
(vi) Lease Agreement between The Industrial Development Board of
the City of Phenix City, Alabama and Mead Coated Board, Inc., dated as
of June 1, 1993, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
(10)(vii) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997).
(vii) Lease Agreement between The Industrial Development Board of
the City of Phenix City, Alabama and Mead Coated Board, Inc., dated as
of September 1, 1997, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10 (vi) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1999).
(viii) Lease Agreement between The Industrial Development Board of
the City of Stevenson, Alabama and The Mead Corporation, dated as of
March 1, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(3) to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period
ended March 29, 1998).
The following are compensatory plans and arrangements in which directors
or executive officers participate:
(ix) 1991 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant, as amended
through June 24, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(2) to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
July 4, 1999).
(x) 1996 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant as amended through
June 24, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(3) to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
July 4, 1999).
(xi) 1985 Supplement to Registrant's Incentive Compensation
Election Plan, as amended November 17, 1987, and as further amended
October 29, 1988 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(xii) to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997); as amended effective June 24, 1998 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10 (xiii) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-
K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998).
(xii) Excess Benefit Plan of the Registrant dated January 1, 1996
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(3) to Registrant's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended March 31,
53
1996); as amended effective June 24, 1998 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10 (xiv) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1998).
(xiii) Excess Earnings Benefit Plan of the Registrant dated
January 1, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(4) to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended
March 31, 1996); as amended effective June 24, 1998 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10 (xv) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998).
(xiv) Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan effective
January 1, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(3) to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended
March 30, 1997); as amended effective June 24, 1998 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10 (xvi) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998).
(xv) Form of Indemnification Agreement between Registrant and each
of John G. Breen, Duane E. Collins, William E. Hoglund, James G. Kaiser,
Robert J. Kohlhepp, John A. Krol, Susan J. Kropf, Charles S. Mechem, Jr.,
Heidi G. Miller, Lee J. Styslinger, Jr., Jerome F. Tatar and J. Lawrence
Wilson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 (4) to Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended July 4, 1999).
(xvi) Form of Severance Agreement between Registrant and Jerome F.
Tatar (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 (xvii) to Registrant's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999);
and, Amendment to Severance Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10 (1) of Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly
Period ended July 2, 2000.
(xvii) Form of Severance Agreement between Registrant and each of
Elias M. Karter, Raymond W. Lane, Sue K. McDonnell, Timothy R. McLevish and
other key employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 (xvii) to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 1999); and, Amendment to Severance Agreement (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10 (2) to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarterly Period ended July 2, 2000).
(xviii) Restated Benefit Trust Agreement dated August 27, 1996 by
reference to Exhibit (10)(1) of Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Quarterly Period ended September 29, 1996); as amended effective
June 24, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 (xix) to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 1998); as amended effective October 28, 2000.
(xix) Restricted Stock Plan effective December 10, 1987, as amended
through June 24, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(5) to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
July 4, 1999).
(xx) Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of the Registrant, as
amended through October 29, 1988 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
(10)(xx) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997); as amended effective June 24, 1998 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10 (xxi) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998).
(xxi) 1985 Supplement to Registrant's Deferred Compensation Plan for
Directors, as amended through October 29, 1988 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit (10)(xxi) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1997); as amended effective June 24, 1998
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 (xxii) to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998).
(xxii) Restated Directors Capital Accumulation Plan effective January
1, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10) (4) of
54
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period
ended April 2, 2000).
(xxiii) Form of Executive Life Insurance Policy for Key Executives
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 (xxiii) to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999).
(xxiv) Long Term Incentive Plan effective 1999 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(2) to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Quarterly Period ended April 4, 1999).
(xxv) Long Term Incentive Plan effective 2000 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit (10) (2) of Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended April 2, 2000.
(xxvi) Annual Incentive Plan for 2000 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit (10) (1) of Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Quarterly Period ended April 2, 2000).
(xxvii) Restated Executive Capital Accumulation Plan effective
January 1, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10) (3) of
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period
ended April 2, 2000).
(21) Subsidiaries of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2000).
(23) Consent of Independent Auditors.
(b) No current reports on Form 8-K were filed with the Commission
during fiscal year 2000.
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this amendment to the
Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
THE MEAD CORPORATION
Date: December 20, 2001 By /s/ Jerome F. Tatar
------------------------------------------
Jerome F. Tatar
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and
President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Date: December 20, 2001 By /s/ Jerome F. Tatar
-------------------------------------------
Jerome F. Tatar
Director, Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and
President
Date: December 20, 2001 By /s/ Timothy R. McLevish
-------------------------------------------
Timothy R. McLevish
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
Date: December 20, 2001 By /s/ Peter H. Vogel, Jr.
-------------------------------------------
Peter H. Vogel, Jr.
Vice President, Finance and Treasurer
(principal accounting officer)
Date: December 20, 2001 By /s/ John G. Breen
-------------------------------------------
John G. Breen
Director
Date: December 20, 2001 By /s/ Duane E. Collins
-------------------------------------------
Duane E. Collins
Director
Date: December 20, 2001 By /s/ William E. Hoglund
-------------------------------------------
William E. Hoglund
Director
Date: December 20, 2001 By /s/ James G. Kaiser
-------------------------------------------
James G. Kaiser
Director
Date: December 20, 2001 By /s/ Robert J. Kohlhepp
-------------------------------------------
Robert J. Kohlhepp
Director
Date: December 20, 2001 By /s/ John A. Krol
-------------------------------------------
John A. Krol
Director
Date: December 20, 2001 By /s/ Susan J. Kropf
-------------------------------------------
56
Susan J. Kropf
Director
Date: December 20, 2001 By /s/ Heidi G. Miller
-------------------------------------------
Heidi G. Miller
Director
Date: December 20, 2001 By /s/ Lee J. Styslinger, Jr.
-------------------------------------------
Lee J. Styslinger, Jr.
Director
Date: December 20, 2001 By /s/ J. Lawrence Wilson
-------------------------------------------
J. Lawrence Wilson
Director
57