SCHEDULE 14A

                                 (Rule 14a-101)

                     INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                               (Amendment No. ___)

Filed by the Registrant  [X]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  [_]

Check the appropriate box:


[_] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive Proxy Statement
[X] Definitive Additional Materials
[_] Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12

[_] Confidential, for Use of the Commission
    Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))


                                     Maytag
                (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X]  No fee required.

[_]  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

     (1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

     (2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

     (3)  Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
          pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
          filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

     (4)  Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

     (5)  Total fee paid:

[_]  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:

[_]  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
     0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
     previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
     or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

     (1)  Amount previously paid:

     (2)  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

     (3)  Filing Party:

     (4)  Date Filed:




April 25, 2002

To: Maytag Corporation Employees
From: CEO Ralph F. Hake

I want to draw your attention--especially employee shareholders--to a set of
issues that could impact value to Maytag shareholders.

Our annual shareholders meeting will be held Thursday, May 9, and we are asking
shareholders to vote on six proposals, three of which are proposals from three
shareholders. If you are a shareholder and received a proxy statement at home or
online, you may already be familiar with the three shareholder proposals:

     .    One proposal, Proposal No. 4, calls for our board of directors to each
          be elected annually. Currently Maytag has a classified, or staggered
          board, with directors serving three-year terms, and one-third of the
          board being elected or re-elected each year. This system assures that
          the majority of directors at any time will have prior experience and
          in-depth knowledge of Maytag. Our board believes that electing the
          entire board of directors annually would be disruptive and potentially
          cause a lack in continuity needed in our highly competitive
          industries.

     .    Another proposal, Proposal No. 5, recommends elimination of all super
          majority voting provisions in Maytag's bylaws and charter. Our board
          believes the super majority provisions are important defensive tools
          that empower the board to act in the best interest of all
          shareholders.

     .    The last proposal, Proposal No. 6, requests Maytag's Shareholder
          Rights Plan, sometimes called a "poison pill," to be redeemed, or put
          to a shareholder vote. Again, our board believes that without a rights
          plan, the board could lose important bargaining power in negotiating
          with a potential acquirer or pursuing a potentially superior
          alternative.

The Maytag board of directors recommends voting against all three shareholder
proposals because they are not in the best interest of the corporation or Maytag
shareholders. Through the dedication and hard work of employees, Maytag is
moving aggressively to improve our earnings performance. The above proposals do
not help us as employees to create a better performing Maytag, nor, in our
opinion, do the proposals assist the board in generating greater value for our
shareholders. The proxy statement, which is available from maytagcorp.com,
provides more detail on the directors' recommendations.

If you are an employee shareholder, I urge you to exercise your right to vote
and to give careful consideration to these shareholder proposals. You are, of
course, free to vote as you choose, without consequence to your employment or
without review of your vote.

If you have general questions about the shareholder meeting, please call Gwen
Gosselink at 641-787-8584. But please do vote because your vote counts, and it
is another way of exercising your voice as an employee. Thank you for your
interest in these important issues. I value your comments on these or other
issues at any time.