SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]
Check the appropriate box:
[_] Preliminary Proxy Statement [_] CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE
COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY
RULE 14A-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive Additional Materials
[_] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-12
Fastenal Company
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1) or 14a-6(i)(2)
or Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.
[_] $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
14a-6(i)(3).
[_] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which
the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
[_] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[_] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
FASTENAL COMPANY
2001 Theurer Boulevard
Winona, Minnesota 55987
(507) 454-5374
March 21, 1995
Dear Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be
held at the Company's offices at 2001 Theurer Boulevard, Winona, Minnesota,
commencing at 10 o'clock a.m., Central Daylight Savings Time, on Tuesday, April
25, 1995.
The Secretary's Notice of Annual Meeting and the Proxy Statement which follow
describe the matters to come before the meeting. During the meeting, we will
also review the activities of the past year and items of general interest about
the Company.
We hope that you will be able to attend the meeting in person and we look
forward to seeing you. Please mark, date and sign the enclosed Proxy and return
it in the accompanying envelope as quickly as possible, even if you plan to
attend the Annual Meeting. You may revoke the Proxy and vote in person at that
time if you so desire.
Sincerely,
LOGO
Robert A. Kierlin
Chairman of the Board and President
FASTENAL COMPANY
-----------------------------------
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON APRIL 25, 1995
-----------------------------------
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Fastenal Company will be held at the
Company's offices at 2001 Theurer Boulevard, Winona, Minnesota, commencing at
10 o'clock a.m., Central Daylight Savings Time, on Tuesday, April 25, 1995 for
the following purposes:
1. To elect a Board of Directors of five directors, to serve until
the next regular meeting of shareholders or until their successors
have been duly elected and qualified.
2. To ratify the appointment of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP as independent
auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 1995.
3. To transact such other business as may properly be brought before
the meeting.
The Board of Directors has fixed March 14, 1995 as the record date for the
meeting, and only shareholders of record at the close of business on that date
are entitled to receive notice of and vote at the meeting.
YOUR PROXY IS IMPORTANT TO ENSURE A QUORUM AT THE MEETING. EVEN IF YOU OWN
ONLY A FEW SHARES, AND WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO BE PRESENT, YOU ARE
URGENTLY REQUESTED TO MARK, DATE, SIGN AND MAIL THE ENCLOSED PROXY IN THE
POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE THAT IS PROVIDED. THE PROXY MAY BE REVOKED BY YOU AT ANY
TIME PRIOR TO BEING EXERCISED, AND RETURNING YOUR PROXY WILL NOT AFFECT YOUR
RIGHT TO VOTE IN PERSON IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING AND REVOKE THE PROXY.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
LOGO
Stephen M. Slaggie
Secretary
Winona, Minnesota
March 21, 1995
------------------
PROXY STATEMENT
------------------
GENERAL INFORMATION
The enclosed Proxy is being solicited by the Board of Directors of Fastenal
Company (the "Company") for use in connection with the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on Tuesday, April 25, 1995 at the Company's offices at
2001 Theurer Boulevard, Winona, Minnesota, commencing at 10 o'clock a.m.,
Central Daylight Savings Time, and at any adjournments thereof. Only
shareholders of record at the close of business on March 14, 1995 will be
entitled to vote at such meeting or adjournment. Proxies in the accompanying
form which are properly signed, duly returned to an officer of the Company and
not revoked will be voted in the manner specified. A shareholder executing a
Proxy retains the right to revoke it at any time before it is exercised by
notice in writing to an officer of the Company of termination of the Proxy's
authority or a properly signed and duly returned Proxy bearing a later date.
The address of the principal executive office of the Company is 2001 Theurer
Boulevard, Winona, Minnesota 55987 and the telephone number is (507) 454-5374.
The mailing of this Proxy Statement and the Board of Directors' form of Proxy
to shareholders will commence on or about March 21, 1995.
Shareholder proposals intended to be presented at the 1996 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders must be received by the Company at its principal executive office
no later than November 22, 1995 for inclusion in the Proxy Statement for that
meeting.
1
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL
SHAREHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, as of March 14, 1995, the ownership of Common
Stock of the Company by each shareholder who is known by the Company to own
beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company, by
each director and nominee for the office of director, by the executive officer
named in the Summary Compensation Table set forth under "Election of
Directors--Executive Compensation" below, and by all directors and executive
officers as a group. At March 14, 1995 there were 18,969,344 shares of Common
Stock, par value $.01, issued and outstanding, each of which is entitled to one
vote.
AMOUNT AND NATURE PERCENTAGE OF
NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OUTSTANDING
OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNERSHIP(1)(2) SHARES(2)
------------------- ----------------- -------------
Robert A. Kierlin...... 2,396,368 12.63%
Route 1, Box 65D
Winona, Minnesota 55987
Stephen M. Slaggie..... 1,182,736(3) 6.23
219 West 7th Street
Winona, Minnesota 55987
Michael M. Gostomski... 663,718(4) 3.50
1666 Valley View Drive
Winona, Minnesota 55987
John D. Remick......... 798,436(5) 4.21
3232 Fox Hollow Court,
S.W.
Rochester, Minnesota
55902
Henry K. McConnon...... 640,656(6) 3.38
1350 Greenwood Circle
State College, Pennsyl-
vania 16803
Robert Marvin
Kommerstad............ 1,463,400(7) 7.71
Provident Investment
Counsel
300 North Lake Avenue
Pasadena, California
91101
Directors and executive
officers as a group
(5 persons)........... 5,501,914 29.00
- --------
(1) Except as otherwise indicated in the Notes below, the listed beneficial
owner has sole voting power and investment power with respect to such
shares.
(2) Each director of the Company is a director and member of the Hiawatha
Education Foundation (the "Foundation") and, as such, shares voting and
investment power with respect to the shares of Common Stock of the
Company owned by the Foundation. As a result, and pursuant to rules
adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the amount shown for
each director includes not only the shares he owns of record, but also
2
45,000 shares owned of record by the Foundation. Each director disclaims
beneficial ownership of the shares owned of record by the Foundation.
Beneficial ownership of each director and of the directors and executive
officers as a group, exclusive of the shares held by the Foundation, is
as follows: Mr. Kierlin, 2,351,368 shares (12.40% of the total
outstanding shares); Mr. Slaggie, 1,137,736 shares (6.0% of the total
outstanding shares); Mr. Gostomski, 618,718 shares (3.26% of the total
outstanding shares); Mr. Remick, 753,436 shares (3.97% of the total
outstanding shares); Mr. McConnon, 595,656 shares (3.14% of the total
outstanding shares); and the directors and executive officers as a group,
5,456,914 shares (28.77% of the total outstanding shares).
(3) Includes 32,000 shares held of record by Mr. Slaggie as custodian for
certain of his children, 16,000 shares held of record by one of Mr.
Slaggie's children, and 60,000 shares held of record by Mr. Slaggie's
wife.
(4) Includes 527,386 shares held of record by Mr. Gostomski's revocable
living trust, over which Mr. Gostomski has voting and dispositive power,
and 80,000 shares held of record by the revocable living trust of Mr.
Gostomski's wife, over which Mr. Gostomski's wife has voting and
dispositive power. Also includes 11,332 shares held of record by
irrevocable trusts for the benefit of certain of Mr. Gostomski's
children. Mr. Gostomski has the power to substitute assets held by such
irrevocable trusts.
(5) Includes 100,000 shares held of record by Mr. Remick's wife, 14,000
shares held of record by Mr. Remick as custodian for certain of his
children, and 11,000 shares held of record by certain of Mr. Remick's
children.
(6) Includes 15,800 shares held of record by Mr. McConnon as custodian for
his son, 80,000 shares held of record by Mr. McConnon's wife and 6,000
shares held of record by Mr. McConnon's father with respect to which Mr.
McConnon has dispositive power pursuant to a power of attorney granted to
Mr. McConnon by his father.
(7) According to an amendment to Schedule 13G statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission reflecting ownership as of December
31, 1994, Provident Investment Counsel, a registered investment adviser
("Provident"), and Mr. Kommerstad, an affiliate of Provident, have shared
power to dispose of 1,463,400 shares and shared power to vote 1,372,200
shares. No other person or entity has the power to vote or dispose of the
shares over which Provident and Mr. Kommerstad have shared power.
3
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
NOMINEES AND REQUIRED VOTE
The Restated Bylaws of the Company provide that the business of the Company
shall be managed by or under the direction of a Board of Directors of not less
than five nor more than nine directors, which number shall be fixed from time
to time by the Board of Directors. Each director shall be elected at the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders for a term that expires at the next regular
shareholders' meeting and shall hold office for the term for which he was
elected and until a successor is elected and has qualified. The Board of
Directors has fixed the number of directors to be elected for the ensuing year
at five and has nominated the five persons named below for election as
directors. Proxies solicited by the Board of Directors will, unless otherwise
directed, be voted to elect the five nominees named below to constitute the
entire Board of Directors.
All of the nominees named below are current directors of the Company. Each
nominee has indicated a willingness to serve as a director for the ensuing
year, but in case any nominee is not a candidate at the meeting for any reason,
the Proxies named in the enclosed form of Proxy may vote for a substitute
nominee in their discretion.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares
of Common Stock of the Company present and entitled to vote on the election of
directors is required for election to the Board of each of the five nominees
named below. For this purpose, a shareholder who abstains with respect to the
election of directors is considered to be present and entitled to vote on the
election of directors at the meeting, and is in effect casting a negative vote,
but a shareholder (including a broker) who does not give authority to a Proxy
to vote, or withholds authority to vote, on the election of directors shall not
be considered present and entitled to vote on the election of directors.
The following table sets forth certain information as to each nominee for the
office of director:
NAME AGE POSITION
---- --- --------
Robert A. Kierlin.................... 55 Chairman of the Board, President and
Director
Stephen M. Slaggie................... 55 Secretary, Treasurer and Director
Michael M. Gostomski................. 54 Director
John D. Remick....................... 58 Director
Henry K. McConnon.................... 55 Director
Mr. Kierlin has been the Chairman of the Board and President of the Company
and has served as a director since the Company's incorporation in 1968.
Mr. Slaggie has been the Secretary and Treasurer of the Company and has
served as a director since 1970. He became a full-time employee of the Company
in December 1987, at which time he assumed the additional duties of Shareholder
Relations Director and Insurance Risk Manager.
Mr. Gostomski has served as a director since 1973. Since June 1993, Mr.
Gostomski has been the President of Winona Heating & Ventilating Co., a sheet
metal and roofing contractor located in Winona, Minnesota ("Winona Heating").
For more than five years prior to June 1993, Mr. Gostomski was a Vice President
of Winona Heating.
Mr. Remick has served as a director since the Company's incorporation in
1968. Since June 1993, Mr. Remick has been the President of the Rochester
Athletic Club. For more than five years prior to February 1992, Mr. Remick was
employed as an engineer or engineer/manager by IBM at its Rochester, Minnesota
facility.
4
Mr. McConnon has served as a director since the Company's incorporation in
1968. For more than the past five years, Mr. McConnon has been the President of
Wise Eyes, Inc., an eyeglass retailer located in State College, Pennsylvania.
None of the above nominees is related to any other nominee or to any
executive officer of the Company.
BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS
The Company has an Audit Committee consisting of Robert A. Kierlin, John D.
Remick and Michael M. Gostomski. The Audit Committee held three meetings during
1994. The Audit Committee has the authority to (a) make recommendations to the
Board of Directors as to the engagement of independent auditors, (b) review
with the independent auditors the scope and results of audit engagements, (c)
review the scope, frequency and results of internal audits and examinations,
(d) review the adequacy of the Company's accounting policies and system of
internal accounting controls, and (e) review all related party transactions for
potential conflict-of-interest situations. The Company does not have a
Nominating Committee or a Compensation Committee.
The Board of Directors held two meetings during 1994.
Each director of the Company receives an annual retainer of $1,000, and $500,
plus reimbursement of reasonable expenses, for attendance at each meeting of
the Board. Each member of the Audit Committee receives $250 for attendance at
each Audit Committee meeting that is not held on the date of a meeting of the
Board of Directors. All directors attended more than 75% of the aggregate
number of meetings of the Board and Audit Committee on which they served during
1994.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary of Compensation. Set forth in the following table is information with
respect to the compensation of the chief executive officer of the Company for
each fiscal year of the Company in the three fiscal year period ended December
31, 1994:
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
NAME AND
PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY($)(1)
- ------------------ ---- ------------
Robert A. Kierlin............................................. 1994 $122,500
Chairman of the Board 1993 $122,500
and President 1992 $122,500
- --------
(1) Includes $2,500 paid to Mr. Kierlin each year in his capacity as a director
and member of the Audit Committee of the Company. See "Board and Committee
Meetings" above.
The Company's chief executive officer is the only executive officer of the
Company whose total salary and bonus for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1994 was $100,000 or more.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation. As indicated
under "Board and Committee Meetings" above, the Company does not have a
Compensation Committee or any other committee of the Board of Directors
performing equivalent functions. Decisions regarding compensation of executive
officers of the Company are made by the Board of Directors. The Company's two
executive officers, Robert A. Kierlin and Stephen M. Slaggie, are each
directors of the Company and each participated in all deliberations of the
Board during the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994 concerning executive
officer compensation.
5
Michael M. Gostomski, a director of the Company, is the President of Winona
Heating. Winona Heating purchases certain supplies from the Company from time
to time in the ordinary course of its business, at the same prices charged to
other customers of the Company.
Board Report on Executive Compensation. As required by the rules established
by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Board of Directors has prepared,
for inclusion in this Proxy Statement, the following report on the compensation
policies of the Board applicable to the Company's executive officers.
As shown in the table set forth under "Security Ownership of Principal
Shareholders and Management" above, each of the Company's two executive
officers holds a significant portion of the Company's Common Stock, which was
acquired by such executive officer at the time of the Company's incorporation.
It is the philosophy of the Board of Directors that the executive officers
should be modestly compensated by the Company, and that financial rewards for
the executive officers should come in large part from increases in the value of
the Company's stock held by them.
At the first meeting of the Board of Directors each year, the Board
establishes the maximum total compensation (base salary and, if applicable,
bonus) to be paid to each of the Company's executive officers in their capacity
as executives of the Company for that year. In setting the maximum compensation
of the Company's chief executive officer for 1994, the primary factor
considered by the Board of Directors was the level of compensation paid by two
local organizations to employees whose responsibilities are similar to those of
the chief executive officer. To a lesser extent, the Board also considered the
compensation paid by the Company to its other employees. The local
organizations referred to above were selected based upon their size and the
availability to the Board of information regarding the level of compensation
paid by such organizations to their executives, and did not include the peer
group companies selected by the Company in connection with the preparation of
the stock performance graph set forth below. The Board, although aware of the
compensation paid by companies in the peer group, did not consider the
compensation paid by the peer group companies to their chief executive officers
in setting the compensation of the Company's chief executive officer due to the
fact that the higher average level of compensation present at such companies
does not reflect the philosophy of the Company that executive officers should
be modestly compensated. The Board of Directors determined the maximum
compensation of the Company's other executive officer for 1994 based upon the
compensation paid by the Company to its other employees with comparable levels
of responsibility.
The chief executive officer's executive compensation in 1994 consisted solely
of base salary. The executive compensation of the Company's other executive
officer in 1994 consisted of base salary and the potential for a quarterly
bonus. The actual base salary paid to each executive officer was, within the
limits established by the Board of Directors, determined by such officer based
on such factors as such officer deemed appropriate, provided that the base
salary paid to the Company's other executive officer was subject to the review
and approval of the chief executive officer. The base salary paid to the chief
executive officer was substantially comparable in amount to the compensation
paid by the two local organizations referred to above to their employees with
similar responsibilities. The bonus paid to the Company's other executive
officer was paid under the Company's general employee bonus program for non-
sales personnel. Under the bonus program, an aggregate bonus for each of the
Company's departments is determined each quarter by comparing the department's
actual expenses for such quarter expressed as a percentage of the Company's
sales for such quarter with the
6
department's historical costs expressed as a percentage of the Company's
historical sales. If the department's actual expenses are less than its
historical costs expressed in such manner, then a portion of the difference is
paid to the department in the form of a bonus. The aggregate bonus, if any, for
each department is then allocated among the department's employees in a manner
determined by the department's supervisor based on the level of responsibility
of each such employee, provided that such allocation is subject to the review
and approval of the Company's chief executive officer. The Company's other
executive officer is the supervisor of his department. In addition to the
executive compensation paid by the Company in 1994 to its executive officers,
as noted under "Board and Committee Meetings" above, the Company also paid to
such executive officers in their capacity as directors and/or committee members
of the Company the same annual retainer and meeting fees paid to the Company's
other directors.
There has been no increase in the annual base salary paid to the Company's
chief executive officer in the last eight completed fiscal years, or in the
annual base salary paid to the Company's other executive officer since he
became a full-time employee of the Company. The salary paid to the Company's
chief executive officer in 1994, determined by him within the limits
established by the Board of Directors, was 60% of the maximum compensation
authorized for payment to him by the Board.
The Board of Directors is aware of the $1,000,000 limit on deductibility of
executive compensation contained in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986. However, since the Company's executive compensation is paid in cash
and is set at levels such that each executive officer will receive compensation
well below the $1,000,000 limit, the Board has determined that it is not
necessary at this time to take any position with respect to the non-
deductibility of compensation in excess of $1,000,000.
The Board of Directors did not set the maximum compensation of the Company's
executive officers based on the Company's performance, and the executive
officers were not required to consider the Company's performance in determining
their actual base salary. However, the Board of Directors believes that the
compensation of the Company's executive officers is very low by national and
regional standards (based on a comparison of executive compensation paid by the
Company and certain other comparably sized companies published in a national
business periodical), particularly in light of the Company's historical
financial results, and that, as a result of their share ownership, the
interests of the Company's executive officers are closely aligned with the
long-term interests of the Company and its public shareholders.
The Board of Directors
Robert A. Kierlin
Stephen M. Slaggie
Michael M. Gostomski
John D. Remick
Henry K. McConnon
7
Performance Graph. Set forth below is a graph comparing, for a period of five
years ended December 31, 1994, the yearly cumulative total shareholder return
on the Company's Common Stock with the yearly cumulative total shareholder
return of the NASDAQ Market Index and an index of a group of peer companies
selected by the Company. The comparison of total shareholder returns assumes
that $100 was invested on December 31, 1989 in each of the Company, the NASDAQ
Market Index and the peer group index, and that dividends were reinvested when
and as paid. The companies in the peer group are Lawson Products, Inc., Noland
Company, Premier Industrial Corporation and RB&W Corporation. The Company is
not included in the peer group. In calculating the yearly cumulative total
shareholder return of the peer group index, the shareholder returns of the
companies included in the peer group are weighted according to the stock market
capitalizations of such companies at the beginning of each period for which a
return is indicated.
COMPARISON OF FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG FASTENAL COMPANY, NASDAQ MARKET INDEX AND PEER GROUP INDEX
[PERFORMANCE GRAPH APPEARS HERE]
Measurement Period FASTENAL NASDAQ
(Fiscal Year Covered) COMPANY MARKET INDEX PEER GROUP
- ------------------- ---------- ------------ ----------
Measurement Pt-
12/31/89 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00
FYE 12/31/90 $109.17 $ 81.12 $102.09
FYE 12/31/91 $219.61 $104.14 $116.48
FYE 12/31/92 $277.77 $105.16 $149.44
FYE 12/31/93 $415.58 $126.14 $165.16
FYE 12/31/94 $548.59 $132.44 $144.98
8
RELATIONSHIP WITH AND APPOINTMENT
OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors has selected KPMG Peat Marwick LLP to serve as the
Company's independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 1995,
subject to ratification by the shareholders. While it is not required to do so,
the Board of Directors is submitting the selection of that firm for
ratification in order to ascertain the view of the shareholders. If the
selection is not ratified, the Board of Directors will reconsider its
selection. Proxies solicited by the Board of Directors will, unless otherwise
directed, be voted to ratify the appointment of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP as
independent auditors for the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31,
1995.
A representative of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP will be present at the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders and will be afforded an opportunity to make a statement
if such representative so desires and will be available to respond to
appropriate questions during the meeting.
GENERAL
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's
directors and executive officers to file initial reports of ownership and
reports of changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Directors and executive officers are required by Commission regulations to
furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based
solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company and
written representations from the Company's directors and executive officers,
all Section 16(a) filing requirements were met for the year ended December 31,
1994.
The Annual Report of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994,
including financial statements, is being mailed with this Proxy Statement.
As of the date of this Proxy Statement, management knows of no matters that
will be presented for determination at the meeting other than those referred to
herein. If any other matters properly come before the meeting calling for a
vote of shareholders, it is intended that the shares represented by the Proxies
solicited by the Board of Directors will be voted by the Proxies named therein
in accordance with their best judgment.
The Company will pay the cost of soliciting Proxies in the accompanying form.
In addition to solicitation by the use of mails, certain directors, officers
and regular employees of the Company may solicit Proxies by telephone, telegram
or personal interview, and may request brokerage firms and custodians, nominees
and other record holders to forward soliciting materials to the beneficial
owners of stock of the Company and will reimburse them for their reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses in so forwarding such materials.
SHAREHOLDERS WHO WISH TO OBTAIN A COPY OF THE COMPANY'S 10-K ANNUAL REPORT,
FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1994, MAY DO SO WITHOUT CHARGE BY WRITING TO STEPHEN M. SLAGGIE,
SECRETARY, AT THE COMPANY'S OFFICES, 2001 THEURER BOULEVARD, WINONA, MINNESOTA
55987.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
LOGO
Stephen M. Slaggie
Secretary
Dated: March 21, 1995
9
PROXY FASTENAL COMPANY
SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS--APRIL 25, 1995
The undersigned, revoking any proxy heretofore given, hereby appoints Robert
A. Kierlin, Stephen M. Slaggie and Michael M. Gostomski, and each of them, as
Proxies, each with full power of substitution, for and in the name of the
undersigned to vote, as designated below, and on the reverse side hereof, all
the shares of Common Stock of Fastenal Company registered in the name of the
undersigned at the close of business on March 14, 1995, at the Annual Meeting
of Shareholders to be held on April 25, 1995, and at any adjournment thereof.
1. Election of Directors. Nominees of the Board of Directors are Robert A.
Kierlin, Stephen M. Slaggie, Michael M. Gostomski, John D. Remick and Henry K.
McConnon.
[_] FOR ALL NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE except vote withheld from the following
nominee(s), if any:
[_] WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all
nominees listed above
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP as independent
auditors for the 1995 fiscal year.
[_] FOR[_] AGAINST[_] ABSTAIN
(continued, and to be dated and signed, on other side)
3. Any other business which may properly be considered and acted upon at said
meeting.
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED ON THE REVERSE
SIDE, BUT IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL NOMINEES
NAMED ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND FOR PROPOSAL 2. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING,
IF THIS PROXY IS TO BE VOTED FOR ANY NOMINEE NAMED ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND
SUCH NOMINEE IS UNWILLING OR UNABLE TO SERVE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR A
SUBSTITUTE IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES. THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO
VOTE IN THEIR DISCRETION UPON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE
THE MEETING.
Dated: _______________________, 1995
Please sign exactly as this
Proxy is addressed.
------------------------------------
------------------------------------
(Signature)
Jointly owned shares will be voted
as directed if one owner signs
unless another owner instructs to
the contrary, in which case the
shares will not be voted. When
signing as attorney, executor,
administrator, guardian, custodian,
or corporate official, sign name
and title.