1 ================================================================================ UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2000 Commission file number 1-12672 AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) -------------------- Maryland 77-0404318 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 2900 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 300 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) (703) 329-6300 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) (Former name, if changed since last report) -------------------- Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve (12) months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days. Yes [X] No [ ] APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS ------------------------------------ Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: 66,169,359 shares outstanding as of May 1, 2000 ================================================================================ 2 AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. FORM 10-Q INDEX PAGE ---- PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2000 (unaudited) and December 31,1999 (audited)...................................................................... 2 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999................................................................... 3 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999................................................................... 4-5 Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)................................ 6-15 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations...................................................................................... 16-38 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk...................................... 39 PART II - OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings............................................................................... 39 Item 2. Changes in Securities........................................................................... 39 Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities................................................................. 39 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders............................................. 39 Item 5. Other Information............................................................................... 39 Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K................................................................ 39-41 Signatures............................................................................................... 42 1 3 PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Dollars in thousands, except share data) 3-31-00 (unaudited) 12-31-99 ----------- ------------- ASSETS Real estate: Land $ 689,279 $ 663,007 Buildings and improvements 3,019,541 2,942,866 Furniture, fixtures and equipment 89,451 82,467 ----------- ----------- 3,798,271 3,688,340 Less accumulated depreciation (245,012) (206,962) ----------- ----------- Net operating real estate 3,553,259 3,481,378 Construction in progress (including land) 415,335 395,187 Communities held for sale 95,009 164,758 ----------- ----------- Total real estate, net 4,063,603 4,041,323 Cash and cash equivalents 8,076 7,621 Cash in escrow 9,468 8,801 Resident security deposits 14,610 14,113 Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures 10,771 10,702 Deferred financing costs, net 13,194 14,056 Deferred development costs 12,125 12,938 Participating mortgage notes 21,483 21,483 Prepaid expenses and other assets 26,786 23,625 ----------- ----------- TOTAL ASSETS $ 4,180,116 $ 4,154,662 =========== =========== LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Variable rate unsecured credit facility $ 205,000 $ 178,600 Unsecured notes 985,000 985,000 Notes payable 429,170 430,047 Dividends payable 46,887 44,139 Payables for construction 17,145 18,874 Accrued expenses and other liabilities 45,749 40,226 Accrued interest payable 14,467 28,134 Resident security deposits 25,404 23,980 ----------- ----------- TOTAL LIABILITIES 1,768,822 1,749,000 ----------- ----------- Minority interest of unitholders in consolidated partnerships 35,502 35,377 Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock, $.01 par value; $25 liquidation value; 50,000,000 shares authorized at both March 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999; 18,322,700 shares outstanding at both March 31, 2000 and 1999 183 183 Common stock, $.01 par value; 140,000,000 shares authorized at both March 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999; 65,968,309 and 65,758,009 shares outstanding at March 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999, respectively 660 658 Additional paid-in capital 2,449,648 2,442,510 Deferred compensation (5,477) (3,559) Dividends in excess of accumulated earnings (69,222) (69,507) ----------- ----------- TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 2,375,792 2,370,285 ----------- ----------- TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 4,180,116 $ 4,154,662 =========== =========== See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. 2 4 AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) For the three months ended --------------------------- 3-31-00 3-31-99 --------- ---------- Revenue: Rental income $ 134,785 $ 118,573 Management fees 248 339 Other income 55 34 --------- --------- Total revenue 135,088 118,946 --------- --------- Expenses: Operating expenses, excluding property taxes 33,338 32,701 Property taxes 11,230 10,714 Interest expense 20,067 16,468 Depreciation 29,419 27,226 General and administrative 2,947 2,368 Non-recurring charges -- 16,524 --------- --------- Total expenses 97,001 106,001 --------- --------- Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures 694 726 Interest income 1,020 1,662 Minority interest in consolidated partnerships (539) (433) --------- --------- Income before gain on sale of communities 39,262 14,900 Gain on sale of communities 7,910 -- --------- --------- Net income 47,172 14,900 Dividends attributable to preferred stock (9,945) (9,945) --------- --------- Net income available to common stockholders $ 37,227 $ 4,955 ========= ========= Per common share: Net income - basic $ 0.56 $ 0.08 ========= ========= Net income - diluted $ 0.55 $ 0.08 ========= ========= See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. 3 5 AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (Dollars in thousands) For the three months ended -------------------------- 3-31-00 3-31-99 -------- ---------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income $ 47,172 $ 14,900 Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 29,419 27,226 Amortization of deferred compensation 1,248 460 Decrease (increase) in investments in unconsolidated joint ventures (69) 164 Income allocated to minority interest in consolidated partnerships 539 433 Gain on sale of communities (7,910) -- Decrease (increase) in cash in escrow (667) 18 Increase in resident security deposits, accrued interest on participating mortgage notes, prepaid expenses and other assets (3,518) (3,641) Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses, other liabilities and accrued interest payable (5,907) 11,496 -------- --------- Net cash provided by operating activities 60,307 51,056 -------- --------- CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Decrease in construction payables (1,729) (8,024) Proceeds from sale of communities, net of selling costs 29,325 12,991 Purchase and development of real estate (72,392) (127,598) -------- --------- Net cash used in investing activities (44,796) (122,631) -------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Issuance of common stock 3,974 7,428 Dividends paid (44,139) (43,323) Proceeds from sale of unsecured notes -- 125,000 Payment of deferred financing costs -- (797) Repayments of notes payable (877) (838) Net borrowings under (repayments of) unsecured facility 26,400 (6,000) Distributions to minority partners (414) (195) -------- --------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (15,056) 81,275 -------- --------- Net increase in cash 455 9,700 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 7,621 8,890 -------- --------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 8,076 $ 18,590 ======== ========= Cash paid during period for interest, net of amount capitalized $ 31,801 $ 21,903 ======== ========= See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. 4 6 Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities (dollars in thousands): During the three months ended March 31, 1999, 17,598 units of limited partnership were presented for redemption to the DownREIT partnership that issued such units and were acquired by the Company for an equal number of shares of the Company's common stock. During the three months ended March 31, 2000, 7,048 units of limited partnership were presented for redemption to the DownREIT partnership that issued such units and were acquired by the Company for an equal number of shares of the Company's common stock. Common and preferred dividends declared but not paid as of March 31, 2000 and 1999 totaled $46,887 and $42,688, respectively. 5 7 AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies Organization and Recent Developments AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (the "Company," which term is often used to refer to AvalonBay Communities, Inc. together with its subsidiaries) is a Maryland corporation that has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company focuses on the ownership and operation of upscale apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets of the United States. These markets include Northern and Southern California and selected markets in the Mid-Atlantic, Northeast, Midwest and Pacific Northwest regions of the country. At March 31, 2000, the Company owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in 124 operating apartment communities containing 36,348 apartment homes in twelve states and the District of Columbia, of which six communities containing 2,496 apartment homes were under reconstruction. The Company also owned nine communities with 2,473 apartment homes under construction and rights to develop an additional 34 communities that, if developed as expected, will contain an estimated 9,140 apartment homes. During the three months ended March 31, 2000, the Company completed the development of three new communities, Avalon Corners, Avalon Fox Mill and Avalon Court North for a total investment of $92,400. These communities, which are located in Stamford, Connecticut, Herndon, Virginia and Melville, New York, contain an aggregate of 700 apartment homes. In 1998, the Company adopted a strategy of disposing of certain assets in markets that did not meet its long-term strategic direction and redeploying the proceeds from such sales to help fund the Company's development and redevelopment activities. In connection with this strategy, the Company sold one community containing 360 apartment homes for net proceeds of approximately $29,325 during the three months ended March 31, 2000. The net proceeds from this disposition will be redeployed to develop and redevelop communities currently under construction or reconstruction. Pending such redeployment, the proceeds from the sale of this community were used to reduce amounts outstanding under the Company's variable rate unsecured credit facility. The interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") for interim financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements required by GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2000 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year. Management believes the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of Management, all adjustments and eliminations, consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements for the interim periods, have been included. Presentation of Historical Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended March 31, 1999 The financial presentation of the historical financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 1999, has been changed from the presentation that appeared in the Company's Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 1999. For a discussion of the change in the presentation and the reasons therefor, see Footnote 2 to the consolidated financial statements presented in the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999. Principles of Consolidation The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned partnerships and certain joint venture partnerships in addition to subsidiary partnerships structured as DownREITs. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. 6 8 In each of the partnerships structured as DownREITs, either the Company or one of the Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries is the general partner, and there are one or more limited partners whose interest in the partnership is represented by units of limited partnership interest. For each DownREIT partnership, limited partners are entitled to receive distributions before any distribution is made to the general partner. Although the partnership agreements for each of the DownREITs are different, generally the distributions per unit paid to the holders of units of limited partnership interests approximate the Company's current common stock dividend per share. Each DownREIT partnership has been structured so that it is unlikely the limited partners will be entitled to a distribution greater than the initial distribution provided for in the partnership agreement. The holders of units of limited partnership interest have the right to present each unit of limited partnership interest for redemption for cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company's common stock on the date of redemption. In lieu of cash redemption of a unit by a partner, we may elect to acquire any unit presented for redemption for one share of common stock. Real Estate Significant expenditures that improve or extend the life of an asset are capitalized. The operating real estate assets are stated at cost and consist of land, buildings and improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment, and other costs incurred during their development, redevelopment and acquisition. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. The capitalization of costs during the development of assets (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs) begins when active development commences and ends when the asset is delivered and a final certificate of occupancy is issued. Cost capitalization during redevelopment of apartment homes (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs) begins when an apartment home is taken out-of-service for redevelopment and ends when the apartment home redevelopment is completed and the apartment home is placed in-service. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include a charge to expense for unrecoverable deferred development costs related to pre-development communities that are unlikely to be developed. Depreciation is calculated on buildings and improvements using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range from seven to thirty years. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are generally depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range from three years (computer related equipment) to seven years. Lease terms for apartment homes are generally one year or less. Rental income and operating costs incurred during the initial lease-up or post-redevelopment lease-up period are fully recognized as they accrue. Development Costs of Software for Internal Use The Company has entered into a formal joint venture cost sharing agreement with another public multifamily real estate company to develop a new on-site property management system and a leasing automation system to enable the Company to capture, review and analyze data to a greater degree than the Company found currently possible with third-party software products. The software development process is currently being managed by Company employees who oversee a project team of employees and third-party consultants. Development costs associated with the software project include computer hardware costs, direct labor costs and third-party consultant costs related to programming and documenting the system. The project began in January 1998 and is expected to be fully implemented in early 2001, although no assurance can be provided in this regard. The Company will continue to develop these systems through the joint venture agreement and the total cost of development will be shared equally between the Company and the joint venture partner. Once developed, the Company and the joint venture partner intend to use the property management and leasing systems in place of their respective systems currently in use for which fees are generally paid to third party vendors. Costs associated with the project are accounted for in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Statement of Position 98-1 ("SOP 98-1") "Accounting for Costs of Computer Software Developed or 7 9 Obtained for Internal Use." Under SOP 98-1, costs of acquiring hardware and costs of coding, documenting and testing the software are capitalized during the application development stage. Following implementation, capitalized development costs are amortized over the system's estimated useful life and other costs such as training and application maintenance are expensed as incurred. Earnings per Common Share In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 128, "Earnings per Share", basic earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999 is computed by dividing earnings available to common shares (net income less preferred stock dividends) by the weighted average number of shares and units of limited partnership in the Company's DownREIT partnerships that were outstanding during the period. Additionally, other potentially dilutive common shares are considered when calculating earnings per share on a diluted basis. The Company's basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999 are as follows: Three months ended ---------------------------------------------- 3-31-00 3-31-99 -------------------- -------------------- Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic 65,719,178 63,986,633 Weighted average units outstanding 969,300 876,546 -------------------- -------------------- Weighted average common shares and units outstanding - basic 66,688,478 64,863,179 Effect of dilutive securities 489,010 350,441 -------------------- -------------------- Weighted average common shares and units outstanding - diluted 67,177,488 65,213,620 ==================== ==================== Certain options to purchase shares of common stock in the amounts of 2,214,497 and 3,333,549 were outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options' exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares. Non-recurring Charges In February 1999, the Company announced certain management changes including (i) the departure of three senior officers who became entitled to severance benefits in accordance with the terms of their employment agreements with the Company dated as of March 9, 1998 and (ii) elimination of duplicate accounting functions and related employee departures. The Company recorded a non-recurring charge of approximately $16,100 in the first quarter of 1999 related to the expected costs associated with this management realignment and certain related organizational adjustments. The expenses associated with the management realignment have been treated as a non-recurring charge. The charge includes severance and benefits expenses, costs to eliminate duplicate accounting functions and legal fees. Certain former employees have elected to receive their severance benefits in an installment basis for up to twelve months. The non-recurring charge also includes Year 2000 remediation costs of $448 that had been incurred for the three months ended March 31, 1999. Selected information relating to the non-recurring charge is summarized below: Elimination of duplicate Severance accounting Legal benefits costs fees Total ------------ ------------- --------- ------------ Total nonrecurring charge (1) $ 15,476 $ 250 $ 350 $ 16,076 Cash payments (15,476) (250) (252) (15,978) ------------ ------------- --------- ------------ Restructuring liability as of March 31, 2000 $ -- $ -- $ 98 $ 98 ============ ============= ========= ============ (1) Excludes Y2K costs of $448. 8 10 Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." This pronouncement establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. SFAS No. 133 requires that changes in the derivative's fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. In June 1999, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 137, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Deferral of the Effective date of SFAS No. 133." SFAS No. 137 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 133 for one year, to fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. The Company currently plans to adopt this pronouncement effective January 1, 2001, and will determine both the method and impact of adoption, which is not expected to be material to the financial statements. In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 ("SAB 101"), "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements". SAB 101 provides guidance on applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue recognition issues in financial statements. The Company adopted SAB 101 effective with the March 31, 2000 reporting period, as required, and the adoption did not have a material effect on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements. 2. Interest Capitalized Capitalized interest associated with communities under development or redevelopment totaled $3,494 and $7,283 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. 3. Notes Payable, Unsecured Notes and Credit Facility The Company's notes payable, unsecured notes and credit facility are summarized as follows: 3-31-00 12-31-99 ------------- ------------ Fixed rate mortgage notes payable (conventional and tax-exempt) $ 361,210 $ 362,087 Variable rate mortgage notes payable (tax-exempt) 67,960 67,960 Fixed rate unsecured notes 985,000 985,000 ------------- ------------ Total notes payable and unsecured notes 1,414,170 1,415,047 Variable rate unsecured credit facility 205,000 178,600 ------------- ------------ Total notes payable, unsecured notes and credit facility $ 1,619,170 $ 1,593,647 ============= ============ Mortgage notes payable are collateralized by certain apartment communities and mature at various dates from May 2001 through December 2036. The weighted average interest rate of the Company's variable rate notes and credit facility was 6.7% at March 31, 2000. The weighted average interest rate of the Company's fixed rate notes (conventional and tax-exempt) was 6.8% at March 31, 2000. 9 11 The maturity schedule for the Company's unsecured notes is as follows: Year of Maturity Principal Interest Rate - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2002 $100,000 7.375% 2003 $50,000 6.25% $100,000 6.5% 2004 $125,000 6.58% 2005 $100,000 6.625% $50,000 6.5% 2006 $150,000 6.8% 2007 $110,000 6.875% 2008 $50,000 6.625% 2009 $150,000 7.5% The Company's unsecured notes contain a number of financial and other covenants with which the Company must comply, including, but not limited to, limits on the aggregate amount of total and secured indebtedness the Company may have on a consolidated basis and limits on the Company's required debt service payments. The Company has a $600,000 variable rate unsecured credit facility (the "Unsecured Facility") with Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, Union Bank of Switzerland and Fleet National Bank, serving as co-agents for a syndicate of commercial banks. The Unsecured Facility bears interest at a spread over the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") based on rating levels achieved on the Company's unsecured notes and on a maturity selected by the Company. The current stated pricing is LIBOR plus 0.6% per annum (6.7% at March 31, 2000). In addition, the Unsecured Facility includes a competitive bid option (which allows banks that are part of the lender consortium to bid to make loans to the Company at a rate that is lower than the stated rate provided by the Unsecured Facility) for up to $400,000. The Company is subject to certain customary covenants under the Unsecured Facility, including, but not limited to, maintaining certain maximum leverage ratios, a minimum fixed charges coverage ratio, minimum unencumbered assets and equity levels and restrictions on paying dividends in amounts that exceed 95% of the Company's Funds from Operations, as defined therein. The Unsecured Facility matures in July 2001 and has two, one-year extension options. 4. Stockholders' Equity The following summarizes the changes in stockholders' equity for the three months ended March 31, 2000: 10 12 Dividends Additional in excess of Total Preferred Common paid-in Deferred accumulated stockholders' stock stock capital compensation earnings equity --------- ------ ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------- Stockholders' equity, December 31, 1999 $183 $658 $2,442,510 $(3,559) $(69,507) $ 2,370,285 Dividends declared to common and preferred stockholders -- -- -- -- (46,887) (46,887) Issuance of common stock -- 2 7,138 (3,166) -- 3,974 Amortization of deferred compensation -- -- 1,248 -- 1,248 Net income -- -- -- -- 47,172 47,172 ---- ---- ---------- ------- -------- ----------- Stockholders' equity, March 31, 2000 $183 $660 $2,449,648 $(5,477) $(69,222) $ 2,375,792 ==== ==== ========== ======= ======== =========== During the three months ended March 31, 2000, the Company issued 12,790 common stock shares in connection with stock options exercised, 86,849 shares through the Company's Dividend Reinvestment Plan, 7,048 shares to acquire operating partnership units from a third party, 9,797 shares in connection with the Company's Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 93,816 shares in connection with restricted stock grants to employees. 5. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures At March 31, 2000, the Company's investments in unconsolidated joint ventures consisted of a 50% general partnership interest in Falkland Partners, a 49% general partnership interest in Avalon Run and a 50% limited liability company membership interest in Avalon Grove. Also during 1999, the Company entered into a joint venture to develop an on-site property management system and a leasing automation system; the Company's joint venture interest consists of a 60% limited liability company membership interest. The following is a combined summary of the financial position of these joint ventures as of the dates presented. 3-31-00 (unaudited) 12-31-99 ----------- -------- Assets: Real estate, net $ 93,897 $ 94,644 Other assets 11,056 10,666 -------- -------- Total assets $104,953 $105,310 ======== ======== Liabilities and partners' equity: Mortgage notes payable $ 26,000 $ 26,000 Other liabilities 6,260 6,479 Partners' equity 72,693 72,831 -------- -------- Total liabilities and partners' equity $104,953 $105,310 ======== ======== The following is a combined summary of the operating results of these joint ventures for the periods presented: Three months ended (Unaudited) ---------------------- 3-31-00 3-31-99 ------- ------- Rental income $ 5,263 $ 5,088 Operating and other expenses (1,462) (1,379) Mortgage interest expense (238) (184) Depreciation and amortization (777) (772) ------- ------- Net income $ 2,786 $ 2,753 ======= ======= 11 13 6. Communities Held for Sale During 1998, the Company completed a strategic planning effort resulting in a decision to pursue a disposition strategy for certain assets in markets that did not meet the Company's long-term strategic direction. In connection with this strategy, the Company solicits competing bids from unrelated parties for individual assets, and considers the sales price and tax ramifications of each proposal. In connection with this strategy, the Company sold one community during the three months ended March 31, 1999. Similarly, one community, Avalon Chase, a 360 apartment home community located in Marlton, New Jersey was sold in connection with this strategy during the three months ended March 31, 2000. The net proceeds of approximately $29,325 from the sale of Avalon Chase will be redeployed to development and redevelopment communities. Pending such redeployment, the proceeds from the sale of this community were primarily used to reduce amounts outstanding under the Company's Unsecured Facility. Management intends to market additional communities for sale during the remainder of 2000. However, there can be no assurance that such assets will be sold, or that such sales will prove to be beneficial to the Company. The assets targeted for sale include land, buildings and improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment, and are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. The Company has not recognized a write-down in its real estate to arrive at net realizable value, although there can be no assurance that the Company can sell these assets for amounts that equal or exceed its estimates of net realizable value. At March 31, 2000, total real estate, net of accumulated depreciation, subject to sale totaled $95,009. Certain individual assets are secured by mortgage indebtedness which may be assumed by the purchaser or repaid by the Company from the net sales proceeds. The Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations include net income of the communities held for sale at March 31, 2000 of $1,821 and $820 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. 7. Segment Reporting SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information," 131 established standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about operating segments in annual financial statements. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company's chief operating decision making group consists primarily of the Company's senior officers. The Company's reportable operating segments include Stable Communities, Developed Communities and Redeveloped Communities: - Stable Communities are communities that 1) have attained stabilized occupancy levels (at least 95% occupancy) and operating costs since the beginning of the prior calendar year (these communities are also known as Established Communities); or 2) were acquired after the beginning of the previous calendar year but were stabilized in terms of occupancy levels and operating costs at the time of acquisition, and remained stabilized throughout the end of the current calendar year. Stable Communities do not include communities where planned redevelopment or development activities have not yet commenced. The primary financial measure for this business segment is Net Operating Income ("NOI"), which represents total revenue less operating expenses and property taxes. With respect to Established Communities, an additional financial measure of performance is NOI for the current year as compared against the prior year and against current year budgeted NOI. With respect to other Stable Communities, performance is primarily based on reviewing growth in NOI for the current period as compared against prior periods within the calendar year and against current year budgeted NOI. 12 14 - Developed Communities are communities which completed development during the prior calendar year of presentation. The primary financial measure for this business segment is Operating Yield (defined as NOI divided by total capitalized costs). Lease-up activities immediately following the completion of development adversely impact operating yields, as stabilized occupancy and operating costs are not yet reached. Performance of Developed Communities is based on comparing Operating Yields against projected yields as determined by Management prior to undertaking the development activity. - Redeveloped Communities are communities that completed redevelopment during the prior calendar year of presentation. The primary financial measure for this business segment is Operating Yield. Lease-up activities immediately following the completion of redevelopment adversely impact operating yields, as stabilized occupancy and operating costs are not yet reached. Performance for Redeveloped Communities is based on comparing Operating Yields against projected yields as estimated by Management prior to undertaking the redevelopment activity. Other communities owned by the Company which are not included in the above segments are communities that were under development or redevelopment at any point in time during the applicable calendar year as well as communities held for sale. The primary performance measure for these assets depends on the stage of development or redevelopment of the community. While under development or redevelopment, Management monitors actual construction costs against budgeted costs as well as economic occupancy. The primary performance measure for communities held for sale is NOI. Net Operating Income for each community is generally equal to that community's contribution to Funds from Operations ("FFO"), except that interest expense related to indebtedness secured by an individual community and depreciation and amortization on non-real estate assets are not included in the community's NOI although such expenses decrease the Company's consolidated net income and FFO. The segments are classified based on the individual community's status as of the beginning of the given calendar year. Therefore, each year the composition of communities within each business segment is adjusted. Accordingly, the amounts between years are not directly comparable. In addition to reporting segments based on the above property types, Management currently reviews its operating segments by geographic regions, including Northern and Southern California, Pacific Northwest, Northeast, Mid-Atlantic and Midwest regions. Because the various locations within each individual region have similar economic and other characteristics, Management finds it useful to review the performance of the Company's communities in those locations on a regional, aggregated basis. The accounting policies applicable to the operating segments described above are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. 13 15 Stable Developed Redeveloped Communities Communities Communities Other Total ------------ ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- For the three months ended 3/31/00 - ---------------------------------- Segment Results Total revenue $ 75,276 $ 23,866 $ 8,757 $ 26,805 $ 134,704 Net Operating Income $ 54,893 $ 17,936 $ 5,755 $ 18,002 $ 96,586 Gross real estate $2,146,801 $655,564 $292,655 $ 912,691 $4,007,711 Operating Yield 10.2% 10.9% 7.9% Non-allocated operations Total revenue $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 384 $ 384 Net Operating Income $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 306 $ 306 Gross real estate $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 307,550 $ 307,550 Total, AvalonBay Total revenue $ 75,276 $ 23,866 $ 8,757 $ 27,189 $ 135,088 Net Operating Income $ 54,893 $ 17,936 $ 5,755 $ 18,308 $ 96,892 Gross real estate $2,146,801 $655,564 $292,655 $1,220,241 $4,315,261 For the three months ended 3/31/99 - ---------------------------------- Segment Results Total revenue $ 87,580 $ 7,721 $ 7,044 $ 16,092 $ 118,437 Net Operating Income $ 60,544 $ 5,766 $ 4,917 $ 9,356 $ 80,583 Gross real estate $2,569,690 $225,171 $231,864 $ 911,271 $3,937,996 Operating Yield 9.4% 10.2% 8.5% Non-allocated operations Total revenue $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 509 $ 509 Net Operating Income $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 450 $ 450 Gross real estate $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 172,958 $ 172,958 Total, AvalonBay Total revenue $ 87,580 $ 7,721 $ 7,044 $ 16,601 $ 118,946 Net Operating Income $ 60,544 $ 5,766 $ 4,917 $ 9,806 $ 81,033 Gross real estate $2,569,690 $225,171 $231,864 $1,084,229 $4,110,954 Operating expenses as reflected on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations include $6,372 and $5,502 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively, of property management overhead costs that are not allocated to individual communities. These costs are not reflected in NOI as shown in the above tables. The amount reflected for "Communities held for sale" on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets is net of $6,646 of accumulated depreciation as of March 31, 2000. 8. Subsequent Events In March 2000, the Company and Gilbert M. Meyer, the Company's Executive Chairman of the Board, announced that Mr. Meyer would retire from his management position on May 10, 2000, the date of the Company's 2000 Annual Meeting of Stockholders ("Annual Meeting"). Although his role as an executive officer of the Company ceased on that date, Mr. Meyer was reelected as a director of the Company at the Annual Meeting. In connection with his retirement, Mr. Meyer entered into various agreements with the Company. Pursuant to a consulting agreement, 14 16 Mr. Meyer will serve as a consultant to the Company for three years following his retirement. The Company will pay to Mr. Meyer an annual fee of $1,395 in accordance with the terms of the consulting agreement, and will also pay to Mr. Meyer 5,880 shares of common stock during each of the first four calendar quarters of the consulting period. During the period of the consultant agreement, Mr. Meyer has agreed that he will not participate, as an officer, employee, consultant or in any other manner, in the affairs of a publicly-traded real estate investment trust or publicly-traded real estate company that is significantly involved in the ownership, operation, management or rental of multifamily apartment homes. Mr. Meyer also agreed, in a retirement agreement, to more restrictive non-competition provisions that will apply for as long as he is a director of the Company. 15 17 ITEM 2. MANAGMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Forward-Looking Statements This Form 10-Q, including the footnotes to the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements, contains "forward-looking statements" as that term is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can identify forward-looking statements by our use of the words "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "assume," and other similar expressions in this Form 10-Q, that predict or indicate future events and trends or that do not relate to historical matters. In addition, information concerning the following are forward-looking statements: - the timing and cost of completion of apartment communities under construction, reconstruction, development or redevelopment; - the timing of lease-up and occupancy of apartment communities; - the pursuit of land on which we are considering future development; - cost, yield and earnings estimates; - the development, implementation and use of management information systems. We cannot assure the future results or outcome of the matters described in these statements; rather, these statements merely reflect our current expectations of the approximate outcomes of the matters discussed. You should not rely on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. These risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: - we may be unsuccessful in managing our current growth in the number of apartment communities and the related growth of our business operations; - our previous or possible future expansion into new geographic market areas may not produce financial results that are consistent with our historical performance; - we may fail to secure development opportunities due to an inability to reach agreements with third parties or to obtain desired zoning and other local approvals; - we may abandon development opportunities for a number of reasons, including changes in local market conditions which make development less desirable, increases in costs of development and increases in the cost of capital; - construction costs of a community may exceed our original estimates; - we may not complete construction and lease-up of communities under development or redevelopment on schedule, resulting in increased interest expense, construction costs and rental revenues that are lower than originally expected; - occupancy rates and market rents may be adversely affected by local economic and market conditions which are beyond our control; - financing may not be available on favorable terms or at all, and our cash flow from operations and access to cost effective capital may be insufficient for the development of our pipeline and could limit our pursuit of opportunities; - our cash flow may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest, and we may be unable to refinance existing indebtedness or the terms of such refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness; and 16 18 - the development, implementation and use of new management information systems may cost more than anticipated or may be delayed for a number of reasons, including unforeseen technological or integration issues. You should read our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes included in this report and the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1999 and the notes included in our annual report on Form 10-K in conjunction with the following discussion. These forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. We do not undertake to update these forward-looking statements, and you should not rely upon them after the date of this report. Business Description and Community Information AvalonBay is a Maryland corporation that has elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for federal income tax purposes. We focus on the ownership and operation of upscale apartment communities (which we consider to be apartment communities that generally command among the highest rents in their submarkets) in high barrier-to-entry markets of the United States. This is because we believe that the limited new supply of upscale apartment homes in these markets helps achieve more predictable cash flows. These barriers-to-entry generally include a difficult and lengthy entitlement process with local jurisdictions and dense in-fill locations where zoned and entitled land is in limited supply. These markets are located in Northern and Southern California and selected states in the Mid-Atlantic, Northeast, Midwest and Pacific Northwest regions of the country. We are a fully-integrated real estate organization with in-house expertise in the following areas: - acquisition; - development and redevelopment; - construction and reconstruction; - financing; - marketing; - leasing and management; and - information technologies. With our expertise and in-house capabilities, we believe we are well-positioned to continue to pursue opportunities to develop and acquire upscale apartment homes in our target markets. Our ability to pursue attractive opportunities, however, may be constrained by capital market conditions that limit the availability of cost effective capital to finance these activities. Recently, we have limited our acquisition activity as compared to prior years due to these capital constraints, and we expect to direct most of our invested capital to new developments and redevelopments, rather than acquisitions, for the foreseeable future. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" and "Future Financing and Capital Needs." We believe apartment communities present an attractive investment opportunity compared to other real estate investments because a broad potential resident base results in relatively stable demand during all phases of a real estate cycle. We intend, subject to the availability of cost-effective capital, to pursue appropriate new investments, including both new developments and acquisitions of communities, in markets where constraints to new supply exist and where new household formations have out-paced multifamily permit activity in recent years. Our real estate investments as of May 1, 2000 consist primarily of stabilized operating apartment communities as well as communities in various stages of the development and redevelopment cycle and land or land options held for development. We classify these investments into the following categories: 17 19 Number of Number of communities apartment homes ----------- --------------- Current Communities 124 36,348 Stabilized Communities 118 33,852 Established Communities: 74 19,593 Northern California 24 6,275 Southern California 8 1,855 Mid-Atlantic 17 4,835 Northeast 18 4,773 Midwest 6 1,591 Pacific Northwest 1 264 Other Stabilized Communities: 44 14,259 Northern California 11 3,174 Southern California 6 2,180 Mid-Atlantic 6 1,829 Northeast 16 5,761 Midwest 2 624 Pacific Northwest 3 691 Lease-Up Communities -- -- Redevelopment Communities 6 2,496 Development Communities 9 2,473 Development Rights 34 9,140 (*) (*) Represents an estimate Current Communities are apartment communities that have been completed and have reached occupancy of at least 95%, have been complete for one year, are in the initial lease-up process or are under redevelopment. Current Communities consist of the following: Stabilized Communities. Represents all Current Communities that have completed initial lease-up by attaining physical occupancy levels of at least 95% or have been completed for one year, whichever occurs earlier. Stabilized Communities are categorized as either Established Communities or Other Stabilized Communities. - Established Communities. Represents all Stabilized Communities owned as of January 1, 1999, with stabilized operating costs as of January 1, 1999 such that a comparison of 1999 operating results to 2000 operating results is meaningful. Each of the Established Communities falls into one of the following six geographic areas: Northern California, Southern California, Mid-Atlantic, Northeast, Midwest and Pacific Northwest regions. - Other Stabilized Communities. Represents Stabilized Communities as defined above, but which became stabilized or were acquired after January 1, 1999. Lease-Up Communities. Represents all communities where construction has been complete for less than one year and where occupancy has not reached at least 95%. As of May 1, 2000, there were no lease-up communities. 18 20 Redevelopment Communities. Represents all communities where substantial redevelopment has begun. Redevelopment is considered substantial when capital invested during the reconstruction effort exceeds the lesser of $5 million or 10% of the community's acquisition cost. Development Communities are communities that are under construction and for which a final certificate of occupancy has not been received. These communities may be partially complete and operating. Development Rights are development opportunities in the early phase of the development process for which we have an option to acquire land or where we own land to develop a new community. We capitalize all related pre-development costs incurred in pursuit of these new developments. Of the Current Communities as of May 1, 2000, we owned: - a fee simple, or absolute, ownership interest in 109 operating communities, one of which is on land subject to a 149 year land lease; - a general partnership interest in five partnerships that each own a fee simple interest in an operating community; - a general partnership interest in four partnerships structured as "DownREITs," as described more fully below, that own an aggregate of nine communities; and - a 100% interest in a senior participating mortgage note secured by one community, which allows us to share in part of the rental income or resale proceeds of the community. We also hold a fee simple ownership interest in eight of the Development Communities and a membership interest in a limited liability company that holds a fee simple interest in one Development Community. In each of the four partnerships structured as DownREITs, either AvalonBay or one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries is the general partner, and there are one or more limited partners whose interest in the partnership is represented by units of limited partnership interest. For each DownREIT partnership, limited partners are entitled to receive distributions before any distribution is made to the general partner. Although the partnership agreements for each of the DownREITs are different, generally the distributions per unit paid to the holders of units of limited partnership interests approximate thecurrent AvalonBay common stock dividend rate per share. Each DownREIT partnership has been structured so that it is unlikely the limited partners will be entitled to a distribution greater than the initial distribution provided for in the partnership agreement. The holders of units of limited partnership interest have the right to present each unit of limited partnership interest for redemption for cash equal to the fair market value of a share of AvalonBay common stock on the date of redemption. In lieu of cash redemption of a unit, we may elect to acquire any unit presented for redemption for one share of our common stock. As of March 31, 2000, there were 966,822 units outstanding. The DownREIT partnerships are consolidated for financial reporting purposes. At March 31, 2000, we had positioned our portfolio of Stabilized Communities, excluding communities owned by unconsolidated joint ventures, to an average physical occupancy level of 97.5%. Our strategy is to maximize total rental revenue through management of rental rates and occupancy levels. Our strategy of maximizing total rental revenue could lead to lower occupancy levels. Given the current high occupancy level of our portfolio, we believe that any rental revenue and net income gains from our Established Communities would be achieved primarily through higher rental rates and the lower average operating costs per apartment home that result from economies of scale due to national and regional growth of our portfolio. We elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the year ended December 31, 1994 19 21 and we have not revoked that election. We were incorporated under the laws of the State of California in 1978, and we were reincorporated in the State of Maryland in July 1995. Our principal executive offices are located at 2900 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 300, Alexandria, Virginia, 22314, and our telephone number at that location is (703) 329-6300. We also maintain regional offices and administrative or specialty offices in or near the following cities: - San Jose, California; - Wilton, Connecticut; - Boston, Massachusetts; - Chicago, Illinois; - Los Angeles, California; - Minneapolis, Minnesota; - Newport Beach, California; - New York, New York; - Princeton, New Jersey; and - Seattle, Washington. Recent Developments Sales of Existing Communities. During 1998, we completed a strategic planning effort that resulted in our decision to increase our geographical concentration in selected high barrier-to-entry markets where we believe we can: - apply sufficient market and management presence to enhance revenue growth; - reduce operating expenses; and - leverage management talent. To effect this increased concentration, we adopted an aggressive capital redeployment strategy and are selling assets in certain markets where our current presence is limited. We intend to redeploy the proceeds from sales to develop and redevelop communities currently under construction or reconstruction. Pending such redeployment, we will use the proceeds from the sale of these communities to reduce amounts outstanding under our variable rate unsecured credit facility. Accordingly, we sold one community containing 360 apartment homes in connection with our capital redeployment strategy during the three months ended March 31, 2000. Net proceeds from this sale totaled $29,325,000. We intend to dispose of additional assets as described more fully under "Future Financing and Capital Needs." Development, Redevelopment and Acquisition Activities. During the three months ended March 31, 2000, we completed the development of three new communities, Avalon Corners, Avalon Fox Mill and Avalon Court North, for a total investment of $92,400,000. These communities, which are located in Stamford, Connecticut, Herndon, Virginia and Melville, New York, contain an aggregate of 700 apartment homes. We also acquired one land parcel located in Darien, Connecticut during the first quarter of 2000 on which construction has not yet begun. We expect to develop one new community containing a total of 189 apartment homes on this parcel. The total investment in this community, including land acquisition costs of $5,474,000, is projected to be approximately $37,000,000. During the first quarter of 2000, we began the redevelopment of two communities, Avalon at Cortez Hill and Lakeside. These communities are located in San Diego, California and Burbank, California, respectively. The total projected investment in redevelopment for these communities (i.e., excluding acquisition costs), which contain 1,041 apartment homes, is $29,400,000. 20 22 The development and redevelopment of communities involves risks that the investment will fail to perform in accordance with expectations. See "Risks of Development and Redevelopment" for our discussion of these and other risks inherent in developing or redeveloping communities. In March 2000, AvalonBay and Gilbert M. Meyer, AvalonBay's Executive Chairman of the Board, announced that Mr. Meyer would retire from his management position on May 10, 2000, the date of AvalonBay's 2000 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Although his role as an executive officer of AvalonBay ceased on that date, Mr. Meyer was reelected as a director of AvalonBay at the May 2000 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. In connection with his retirement, Mr. Meyer entered into various agreements with AvalonBay. Pursuant to a consulting agreement, Mr. Meyer will serve as a consultant to AvalonBay for three years following his retirement. AvalonBay will pay to Mr. Meyer an annual fee of $1,395,000 in accordance with the terms of the consulting agreement, and will also pay to Mr. Meyer 5,880 shares of common stock during each of the first four calendar quarters of the consulting period. During the period of the consultant agreement, Mr. Meyer has agreed that he will not participate, as an officer, employee, consultant or in any other manner, in the affairs of a publicly-traded real estate investment trust or publicly-traded real estate company that is significantly involved in the ownership, operation, management or rental of multifamily apartment homes. Mr. Meyer also agreed, in a retirement agreement, to more restrictive non-competition provisions that will apply for as long as he is a director of AvalonBay. Results of Operations Historically, the changes in our operating results from period-to-period have been primarily the result of increases in the number of apartment homes owned. Where appropriate, period-to-period comparisons of the number of occupied apartment homes are made on a weighted average basis to adjust for changes in the number of apartment homes during the period. For Stabilized Communities, excluding communities owned by unconsolidated joint ventures, all occupied apartment homes are included in the calculation of weighted average occupied apartment homes for each reporting period. For communities in the initial lease-up phase, only apartment homes of communities that are completed and occupied are included in the weighted average number of occupied apartment homes calculation for each reporting period. The financial presentation of our historical financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 1999, has been changed from the presentation that appeared in AvalonBay's Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 1999. For a discussion of the change in the presentation and the reasons therefor, see Footnote 2 to the consolidated financial statements presented in AvalonBay's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999. A comparison of our operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and March 31, 1999 follows. Net income available to common stockholders increased $32,272,000 to $37,227,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to $4,955,000 for the comparable period of the preceding year. Adjusting for non-recurring charges and gain on sale of communities, net income available to common stockholders increased by $7,838,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to the comparable period of the preceding year. The increase in net income, as adjusted, for the three months ended March 31, 2000 is primarily attributable to additional operating income from newly developed or redeveloped communities as well as growth in operating income from Established Communities. Rental income increased $16,212,000 (13.7%) to $134,785,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to $118,573,000 for the comparable period of the preceding year. The increase is primarily due to the addition of newly developed, redeveloped and acquired apartment homes, partially offset by the sale of communities during the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999. Overall Portfolio - The $16,212,000 increase in rental income is primarily due to an increase in the weighted average monthly rental income per occupied apartment home offset by a decrease in the weighted average number of occupied apartment homes. The weighted average number of occupied apartment homes decreased from 34,291 apartment homes for the three months ended March 31, 1999 to 33,746 apartment homes for the three months ended March 31, 2000 primarily 21 23 as a result of the sale of communities during 1999, offset by the development, redevelopment and acquisition of new communities. For the three months ended March 31, 2000, the weighted average monthly revenue per occupied apartment home increased $184 (16.1%) to $1,328 compared to $1,144 for the comparable period of the preceding year, which is primarily attributable to the development of new apartment communities with higher average rents and the sale of communities with lower average rents. These newly developed apartment communities were funded in part from the proceeds of communities sold in markets where rental rates are lower. Established Communities - Rental revenue increased $4,678,000 (6.6%) for the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to the comparable period of the preceding year. The increase is due to market conditions that allowed for higher average rents and higher economic occupancy levels. For the three months ended March 31, 2000, weighted average monthly revenue per occupied apartment home increased $64 (5.2%) to $1,314 compared to $1,250 for the comparable period of the preceding year. The average economic occupancy increased from 96.1% for the three months ended March 31, 1999 to 97.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2000. Management fees decreased $91,000 (26.8%) to $248,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to $339,000 for the comparable period of the preceding year. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decline in the number of third party communities that we manage from five communities at March 31, 1999 to two communities at March 31, 2000. We anticipate that management and development fees will increase over the next several years due to the receipt of fees pursuant to joint venture arrangements. Operating expenses, excluding property taxes increased $637,000 (1.9%) to $33,338,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to $32,701,000 for the comparable period of the preceding year. Overall Portfolio - The increase for the three months ended March 31, 2000 is primarily due to the addition of newly developed, redeveloped and acquired apartment homes, partially offset by the sale of communities during the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999. Maintenance, insurance and other costs associated with Development and Redevelopment Communities are expensed as communities move from the initial construction and lease-up phase to the stabilized operating phase. Established Communities - Operating expenses increased $422,000 (3.0%) to $14,370,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to $13,948,000 for the comparable period of the preceding year. The net change is the result of higher redecorating, maintenance, payroll, insurance and administrative costs offset by lower utility and marketing costs. Property taxes increased $516,000 (4.8%) to $11,230,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to $10,714,000 for the comparable period of the preceding year. Overall Portfolio - The increase for the three months ended March 31, 2000 is primarily due to the addition of newly developed, redeveloped or acquired apartment homes, partially offset by the sale of communities during the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999. Property taxes on Development and Redevelopment Communities are expensed as communities move from the initial construction and lease-up phase to the stabilized operating phase. Established Communities - Property taxes decreased $310,000 (4.9%) to $6,013,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to $6,323,000 for the comparable period of the preceding year. The decrease is primarily a result of revised base year tax assessments for previously renovated communities which resulted in supplemental taxes that were lower than those originally projected. 22 24 Interest expense increased $3,599,000 (21.9%) to $20,067,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to $16,468,000 for the comparable period of the preceding year. The increase is primarily attributable to a decrease in capitalized interest and secondarily to the issuance of unsecured notes during 1999. This reflects our strategy to mitigate the risk of floating rate debt in a rising interest rate environment by repaying floating rate debt under the unsecured credit facility (with relatively lower current interest rates) with longer dated fixed rate unsecured debt that has a higher current interest rate. Depreciation increased $2,193,000 (8.1%) to $29,419,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to $27,226,000 for the comparable period of the preceding year. The increase is primarily due to the addition of newly developed, redeveloped and acquired apartment homes, partially offset by the sale of communities during the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999. General and administrative increased $579,000 (24.5%) to $2,947,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to $2,368,000 for the comparable period of the preceding year. The increase is the result of additional overhead from both the hiring of one officer and the recognition of expense in the current period for an existing senior officer whose salary was previously capitalized when he served the Company in a different capacity. Cost savings attained from a management reorganization in the first quarter of 1999 partially offset the increase in expense. Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures decreased $32,000 (4.4%) to $694,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 compared to $726,000 for the comparable period of the preceding year. The decrease is primarily attributable to costs incurred related to the formation of the joint venture to develop our on-site property management system. Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures represents our share of income from joint ventures. Interest income decreased $642,000 (38.6%) to $1,020,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 from $1,662,000 for the comparable period of the preceding year. The decrease is primarily attributable to the sale of the Fairlane Woods participating mortgage note that was sold in the fourth quarter of 1999. Gain on sale of communities of $7,910,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 was attributable to the sale of one community in conjunction with the disposition strategy we implemented in the third quarter of 1998. Capitalization of Fixed Assets and Community Improvements Our policy with respect to capital expenditures is generally to capitalize only non-recurring expenditures. We capitalize improvements and upgrades only if the item: - exceeds $15,000; - extends the useful life of the asset; and - is not related to making an apartment home ready for the next resident. Under this policy, virtually all capitalized costs are non-recurring, as recurring make-ready costs are expensed as incurred. Recurring make-ready costs include the following: - carpet and appliance replacements; - floor coverings; - interior painting; and - other redecorating costs. 23 25 We capitalize purchases of personal property, such as computers and furniture, only if the item is a new addition and the item exceeds $2,500. We generally expense purchases of personal property made for replacement purposes. The application of these policies for the three months ended March 31, 2000 resulted in non-revenue generating capitalized expenditures for Stabilized Communities of approximately $12 per apartment home. For the three months ended March 31, 2000, we charged to maintenance expense, including carpet and appliance replacements, a total of approximately $8,631,000 for Stabilized Communities or $272 per apartment home. We anticipate that capitalized costs per apartment home will gradually increase as the average age of our communities increases. Liquidity and Capital Resources Liquidity. The primary source of liquidity is our cash flows from operations. Operating cash flows have historically been determined by: - the number of apartment homes; - rental rates; - occupancy levels; and - our expenses with respect to these apartment homes. The timing, source and amount of cash flows provided by financing activities and used in investing activities are sensitive to the capital markets environment, particularly to changes in interest rates that are charged to us because changes in interest rates affect our decision as to whether to issue debt securities, borrow money and invest in real estate. Thus, changes in the capital markets environment affect our plans for the undertaking of construction and development as well as acquisition activity. Cash and cash equivalents increased from $7,621,000 at March 31, 1999 to $8,076,000 at March 31, 2000 due to the excess of cash provided by operating activities over cash used in investing and financing activities. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $9,251,000 from $51,056,000 for the three months ended March 31, 1999 to $60,307,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000. The increase is primarily from additional operating cash flow from Established Communities as well as the development and redevelopment of new communities, offset by the loss of cash flow from communities sold during the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999. Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $77,835,000 from $122,631,000 for the three months ended March 31, 1999 to $44,796,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000. This decrease in expenditures reflects a reduction in development, redevelopment and acquisition activity offset by increased proceeds from the sale of communities. The decrease in acquisitions is attributable to a shift in our investment focus away from acquisitions and towards development opportunities that offer higher projected yields, primarily in response to the lack of available properties that meet our increased yield requirements combined with a decrease in the availability of cost-effective capital. Net cash provided by financing activities decreased by $96,331,000 from $81,275,000 for the three months ended March 31, 1999 to $15,056,000 used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2000. The decrease is primarily due to our development and redevelopment activities increasingly being funded through the sale of existing communities as opposed to incurring debt or selling equity, which reflects a reduction in our use of debt financing as opposed to other sources of financing in response to market conditions. 24 26 We regularly review our short and long-term liquidity needs and the adequacy of Funds from Operations, as defined below, and other expected liquidity sources to meet these needs. We believe our principal short-term liquidity needs are to fund: - normal recurring operating expenses; - debt service payments; - the distributions required with respect to our series of preferred stock; - the minimum dividend payments required to maintain our REIT qualification under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and - development and redevelopment activity in which we are currently engaged. We anticipate that we can fully satisfy these needs from a combination of cash flows provided by operating activities and borrowing capacity under the unsecured revolving credit facility. We anticipate that we can satisfy any short-term liquidity needs not satisfied by current operating cash flows from our unsecured revolving credit facility. We believe our principal long-term liquidity needs are the reduction of medium and long-term debt, as well as the procurement of long-term debt to refinance construction and other development related short-term debt. We anticipate that no significant portion of the principal of any indebtedness will be repaid prior to maturity. If we do not have funds on hand sufficient to repay our indebtedness, it will be necessary for us to refinance this debt. This refinancing may be accomplished through additional debt financing, which may be collateralized by mortgages on individual communities or groups of communities, by uncollateralized private or public debt offerings or by additional equity offerings. We also anticipate having significant retained cash flow in each year so that when a debt obligation matures, some or all of each maturity can be satisfied from this retained cash. Although we believe we will have the capacity to meet our long-term liquidity needs, we cannot assure you that additional debt financing or debt or equity offerings will be available or, if available, that they will be on terms we consider satisfactory. Capital Resources. We intend to match the long-term nature of our real estate assets with long-term cost effective capital to the extent permitted by prevailing market conditions. We follow a focused strategy to help facilitate uninterrupted access to capital. This strategy includes: - Hiring, training and retaining associates with a strong resident service focus, which should lead to higher rents, lower turnover and reduced operating costs; - Managing, acquiring and developing upscale communities in dense locations where the availability of zoned and entitled land is limited to provide consistent, sustained earnings growth; - Operating in markets with growing demand, as measured by household formation and job growth, and high barriers-to-entry. We believe these characteristics generally combine to provide a favorable demand-supply balance, which we believe will create a favorable environment for future rental rate growth while protecting existing and new communities from new supply. We expect this strategy to result in a high level of quality to the revenue stream; - Maintaining a conservative capital structure, largely comprised of equity, and with modest, cost-effective leverage. We generally avoid secured debt except in order to obtain low cost, tax-exempt debt. We believe that such a structure should promote an environment whereby current credit ratings levels can be maintained; - Following accounting practices that provide a high level of quality to reported earnings; and - Providing timely, accurate and detailed disclosures to the investment community. 25 27 We believe these strategies provide a disciplined approach to capital access to help position AvalonBay to fund portfolio growth. Capital markets conditions have decreased our access to cost effective capital. See "Future Financing and Capital Needs" for a discussion of our response to the current capital markets environment. The following is a discussion of specific capital transactions, arrangements and agreements. Unsecured Facility Our unsecured revolving credit facility is furnished by a consortium of banks and provides up to $600,000,000 in short-term credit. We pay these banks an annual facility fee of $900,000 in equal quarterly installments. The unsecured facility bears interest at varying levels tied to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) based on ratings levels achieved on our unsecured notes and on a maturity selected by us. The current stated pricing is LIBOR plus 0.6% per annum. The unsecured facility matures in July 2001, however we have two one-year extension options. Therefore, subject to certain conditions, we may extend the maturity to July 2003. A competitive bid option is available for borrowings of up to $400,000,000. This option allows banks that are part of the lender consortium to bid to provide us loans at a rate that is lower than the stated pricing provided by the unsecured facility. The competitive bid option may result in lower pricing if market conditions allow. Pricing under the competitive bid option resulted in average pricing of LIBOR plus 0.5% for amounts most recently borrowed under the competitive bid option. At May 1, 2000, $246,500,000 was outstanding, $83,142,000 was used to provide letters of credit and $270,358,000 was available for borrowing under the unsecured facility. We intend to use borrowings under the unsecured facility for: - capital expenditures; - construction, development and redevelopment costs; - acquisitions of developed or undeveloped communities; - credit enhancement for tax-exempt bonds; and - working capital purposes. Interest Rate Protection Agreements We are not a party to any long-term interest rate agreements, other than interest rate protection and swap agreements on approximately $190 million of our variable rate tax-exempt indebtedness. We intend, however, to evaluate the need for long-term interest rate protection agreements as interest rate market conditions dictate, and we have engaged a consultant to assist in managing our interest rate risks and exposure. Financing Commitments/Transactions Completed During January 2000, we entered into a joint venture agreement with an entity controlled by Multi-Employer Development Partners ("MEDP") to develop Avalon on the Sound, a 412 apartment high rise community in New Rochelle, New York, with total capitalized costs estimated to be $92,130,000. The terms of the limited liability company operating agreement contemplate a long-term capital structure comprised of 60% equity and 40% debt. Equity contributions will be funded 25% by AvalonBay and 75% by MEDP. Construction financing that converts to long-term financing following completion of construction will provide the debt capital. Operating cash flow will be distributed 25% to AvalonBay and 75% to MEDP until each receives a 9% return on invested capital for three consecutive months. Thereafter, operating cash flow will be distributed equally to AvalonBay and MEDP. Upon a sale to a third party, cash will be distributed first to each partner until capital contributions are recovered. Thereafter, sales proceeds 26 28 will be distributed based upon achievement of certain internal rate of return levels. Distributions that result in an internal rate of return to MEDP and the Company of 12-15% are made 40% to AvalonBay and 60% to MEDP. Thereafter, sales proceeds will be distributed equally to AvalonBay and MEDP. After three years following completion of construction, buy-sell provisions are in effect. AvalonBay will receive construction, development and management fees for services rendered to the joint venture. Future Financing and Capital Needs As of March 31, 2000, we had 18 new communities under construction either by us or by unaffiliated third parties with whom we have entered into forward purchase commitments. As of March 31, 2000, a total estimated cost of $237,449,000 remained to be invested in these communities. In addition, we had six other communities under reconstruction, for which an estimated $62,412,000 remained to be invested as of March 31, 2000. Substantially all of the capital expenditures necessary to complete the communities currently under construction and reconstruction will be funded from: - the remaining capacity under our $600,000,000 unsecured credit facility; - the net proceeds from sales of existing communities; - retained operating cash; and/or - the issuance of debt or equity securities. We expect to continue to fund deferred development costs related to future developments from retained operating cash and borrowings under the unsecured facility. We believe these sources of capital will be adequate to take the proposed communities to the point in the development cycle where construction can begin. We have observed and been impacted by a reduction in the availability of cost effective capital since the third quarter of 1998. We cannot assure you that cost effective capital will be available to meet future expenditures required to begin planned reconstruction activity or the construction of the Development Rights. Before planned reconstruction activity or the construction of a Development Right begins, we intend to arrange adequate capital sources to complete these undertakings, although we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain such financing. In the event that financing cannot be obtained, we may have to abandon Development Rights, write-off associated pursuit costs and/or forego reconstruction activity. In such instances, we will not realize the increased revenues and earnings that we expected from such pursuits, and the related write-off of costs will increase current period expenses and reduce Funds from Operations. To meet the balance of our liquidity needs, we will need to arrange additional capacity under our existing unsecured facility, sell additional existing communities and/or issue additional debt or equity securities. While we believe we have the financial position to expand our short term credit capacity and support our capital markets activity, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in completing these arrangements, offerings or sales. The failure to complete these transactions on a cost-effective basis could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and financial condition, including the abandonment of deferred development costs and a resultant charge to earnings. During 1998, we determined that we would pursue a disposition strategy for certain assets in markets that did not meet our long-term strategic direction. Under this program, we solicit competing bids from unrelated parties for these individual assets, and consider the sales price and tax ramifications of each proposal. In connection with this disposition program, we have disposed of one community since January 1, 2000. The net proceeds from the sale of this asset were approximately $29,325,000. We intend to 27 29 actively seek buyers for the remaining communities held for sale. However, we cannot assure you that these assets can be sold on terms that we consider satisfactory. The remaining assets that we have identified for disposition include land, buildings and improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment. Total real estate, net of accumulated depreciation, of all communities identified for sale at March 31, 2000 totaled $95,009,000. Certain individual assets are secured by mortgage indebtedness which may be assumed by the purchaser or repaid from our net sales proceeds. Our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations include net income from the communities held for sale of $1,821,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and $820,000 for the three months ended March 31, 1999. Because the proceeds from the sale of communities are used initially to reduce borrowings under our unsecured facility, the immediate effect of a sale of a community is to reduce Funds from Operations. This is because the yield on a community that is sold exceeds the interest rate on the borrowings that are repaid from such net proceeds. Therefore, changes in the number and timing of dispositions, and the redeployment of the resulting net proceeds, may have a material and adverse effect on our Funds from Operations. Debt Maturities The table on the following page details debt maturities for the next five years, excluding the unsecured facility: 28 30 (Dollars in thousands) ALL-IN PRINCIPALG BALANCE OUTSTANDING INTEREST MATURITY ---------------------- Community Rate (1) Date 12-31-99 3-31-00 - ------------------------------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- TAX-EXEMPT BONDS FIXED RATE Canyon Creek 6.48% Jun-25 $ 37,535 $ 37,400 Waterford 5.88% Aug-14 33,100 33,100 City Heights 5.80% Jun-25 20,263 20,202 CountryBrook 7.87% Mar-12 19,264 19,184 Villa Mariposa 5.88% Mar-17 18,300 18,300 Sea Ridge 6.48% Jun-25 17,026 16,965 Foxchase I 5.88% Nov-07 16,800 16,800 Barrington Hills 6.48% Jun-25 12,843 12,797 Foxchase II 5.88% Nov-07 9,600 9,600 Fairway Glen 5.88% Nov-07 9,580 9,580 Crossbrook 6.48% Jun-25 8,273 8,244 Larkspur Canyon 5.50% Jun-25 7,445 7,423 Avalon View 7.55% Aug-24 18,795 18,715 Avalon at Lexington 6.56% Feb-25 14,602 14,539 Avalon Knoll 6.95% Jun-26 13,580 13,534 Avalon at Dulles 7.04% Jul-24 12,360 12,360 Avalon Fields 7.57% May-27 11,756 11,720 Avalon at Symphony Glen 7.06% Jul-24 9,780 9,780 Avalon West 7.73% Dec-36 8,632 8,619 Avalon Landing 6.85% Jun-26 6,721 6,698 ----------- ---------- 306,255 305,560 VARIABLE RATE Avalon Devonshire Dec-25 27,305 27,305 Avalon at Fairway Hills I Jun-26 11,500 11,500 Laguna Brisas Mar-09 10,400 10,400 Avalon Ridge May-26 18,755 18,755 ----------- ---------- 67,960 67,960 CONVENTIONAL LOANS: FIXED RATE $100 Million Unsecured Notes 7.375% Sep-02 100,000 100,000 $100 Million Unsecured Notes 6.625% Jan-05 100,000 100,000 $110 Million Unsecured Notes 6.875% Dec-07 110,000 110,000 $50 Million Unsecured Notes 6.25% Jan-03 50,000 50,000 $50 Million Unsecured Notes 6.50% Jan-05 50,000 50,000 $50 Million Unsecured Notes 6.625% Jan-08 50,000 50,000 $100 Million Unsecured Notes 6.50% Jul-03 100,000 100,000 $150 Million Unsecured Notes 6.80% Jul-06 150,000 150,000 $125 Million Medium Term Notes 6.58% Feb-04 125,000 125,000 $150 Million Medium Term Notes 7.50% Jul-09 150,000 150,000 Governor's Square 7.65% Aug-04 13,923 13,886 The Arbors 7.25% May-04 12,870 12,870 Gallery Place 7.31% May-01 11,272 11,216 Avalon Walk II 8.93% Nov-04 12,541 12,482 Avalon Pines 8.00% Dec-03 5,226 5,196 ----------- ---------- 1,040,832 1,040,650 VARIABLE RATE-NONE -- -- ----------- ---------- TOTAL INDEBTEDNESS - EXCLUDING CREDIT FACILITY $1,415,047 $1,414,170 =========== ========== -------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Community 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Thereafter - ------------------------------- -------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- TAX-EXEMPT BONDS FIXED RATE Canyon Creek $ 419 $ 594 $ 637 $ 684 $ 733 $ 34,333 Waterford -- -- -- -- -- 33,100 City Heights 189 268 288 308 331 18,818 CountryBrook 250 357 386 417 451 17,323 Villa Mariposa -- -- -- -- -- 18,300 Sea Ridge 190 270 289 310 332 15,574 Foxchase I -- -- -- -- -- 16,800 Barrington Hills 144 203 218 234 251 11,747 Foxchase II -- -- -- -- -- 9,600 Fairway Glen -- -- -- -- -- 9,580 Crossbrook 88 126 136 146 157 7,591 Larkspur Canyon 69 98 105 112 121 6,918 Avalon View 250 350 373 397 425 16,920 Avalon at Lexington 192 271 288 307 326 13,155 Avalon Knoll 141 200 214 230 246 12,503 Avalon at Dulles -- -- -- -- -- 12,360 Avalon Fields 111 157 169 180 193 10,910 Avalon at Symphony Glen -- -- -- -- -- 9,780 Avalon West 40 57 61 65 70 8,326 Avalon Landing 72 101 108 116 124 6,177 -------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- 2,155 3,052 3,272 3,506 3,760 289,815 VARIABLE RATE Avalon Devonshire -- -- -- -- -- 27,305 Avalon at Fairway Hills I -- -- -- -- -- 11,500 Laguna Brisas -- -- -- -- -- 10,400 Avalon Ridge -- -- -- -- -- 18,755 -------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -- -- -- -- -- 67,960 CONVENTIONAL LOANS: FIXED RATE $100 Million Unsecured Notes -- -- 100,000 -- -- -- $100 Million Unsecured Notes -- -- -- -- -- 100,000 $110 Million Unsecured Notes -- -- -- -- -- 110,000 $50 Million Unsecured Notes -- -- -- 50,000 -- -- $50 Million Unsecured Notes -- -- -- -- -- 50,000 $50 Million Unsecured Notes -- -- -- -- -- 50,000 $100 Million Unsecured Notes -- -- -- 100,000 -- -- $150 Million Unsecured Notes -- -- -- -- -- 150,000 $125 Million Medium Term Notes -- -- -- -- 125,000 -- $150 Million Medium Term Notes -- -- -- -- -- 150,000 Governor's Square 116 165 178 193 13,234 -- The Arbors -- -- -- -- 12,870 -- Gallery Place 174 11,042 -- -- -- -- Avalon Walk II 182 264 288 315 11,433 -- Avalon Pines 91 131 142 4,832 -- -- -------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- 563 11,602 100,608 155,340 162,537 610,000 VARIABLE RATE-NONE -- -- -- -- -- -- -------- -------- --------- --------- --------- --------- TOTAL INDEBTEDNESS - EXCLUDING CREDIT FACILITY $ 2,718 $ 14,654 $ 103,880 $ 158,846 $ 166,297 $ 967,775 ======== ======== ========= ========= ========= ========= (1) Includes credit enhancement fees, facility fees, trustees, etc. Inflation Substantially all of the leases at the Current Communities are for a term of one year or less. This may enable us to realize increased rents upon renewal of existing leases or the beginning of new leases. Short-term leases generally minimize our risk from the adverse effects of inflation, although these leases generally permit residents to leave at the end of the lease term without penalty. We believe that short-term leases combined with relatively consistent demand allow rents, and therefore cash flow, from our portfolio of apartments to provide an attractive inflation hedge. Funds from Operations We generally consider Funds from Operations, or FFO, to be an appropriate measure of our operating performance because it helps investors understand our ability to incur and service debt and to make capital expenditures. We believe that to understand our operating results, FFO should be examined with net income as presented in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations included elsewhere in this report. FFO is determined based on a definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts(R) (NAREIT), and is defined as: 29 31 - net income or loss computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except that excluded from net income or loss are gains or losses on sales of property and extraordinary (as defined by GAAP) gains or losses on debt restructuring; - plus depreciation of real estate assets; and - after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP. Therefore it should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance. FFO should also not be considered an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities as determined by GAAP as a measure of liquidity. Additionally, it is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. Further, FFO as calculated by other REITs may not be comparable to our calculation of FFO. For the three months ended March 31, 2000, FFO increased to $58,614,000 from $48,896,000 for the comparable period of the preceding year. This increase is primarily due to the completion of new development and redevelopment communities as well as growth in earnings from Established Communities. FFO previously reported for the three months ended March 31, 1999 excluded a non-recurring restructuring charge of $16,524,000 in conformance with the NAREIT definition of FFO calculations then in effect, or the original definition. NAREIT issued a White Paper dated October 1999 that clarifies the definition of FFO and the treatment of certain nonrecurring charges. The clarified definition includes non-recurring charges in the calculation of FFO. Although we believe the comparison of FFO using the original definition represents a better guide to investors of comparable operations and growth between years, both FFO calculations are presented below for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 1999 (dollars in thousands): For the three months ended ---------------------------- 3-31-00 3-31-99 ------- ------- Net income $47,172 $14,900 Preferred dividends (9,945) (9,945) Depreciation - real estate assets 28,594 26,797 Joint venture adjustments 194 187 Minority interest expense 509 433 (Gain) loss on sale of communities (7,910) -- ------------- ------------- Funds from Operations - Clarified Definition (1) $58,614 $32,372 Non-recurring charges (2) -- 16,524 ------------- ------------- Funds from Operations - Original Definition (3) $58,614 $48,896 ============= ============= Net cash provided by operating activities $ 60,307 $ 51,056 ============= ============= Net cash used in investing activities $ (44,796) $ (122,631) ============= ============= Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities $ (15,056) $ 81,275 ============= ============= (1) Represents Funds from Operations calculated in accordance with NAREIT's October 1999 White Paper on FFO. Our calculation of FFO in accordance with NAREIT's clarified definition of FFO includes the effect on earnings of non-recurring charges for certain management and other organizational changes and Year 2000 remediation costs. (2) Consists of $16,076 related to management and other organizational changes announced during 1998 and $706 for Year 2000 remediation costs. (3) Funds from Operations calculated based on NAREIT's definition of FFO prior to the issuance of the October 1999 White Paper on FFO. Previously, the effect on earnings of non-recurring charges for certain management and other organizational changes and Year 2000 remediation costs were excluded from the calculation of FFO. 30 32 Management Information Systems We believe that an innovative management information systems infrastructure will be an important element in managing our future growth. This is because timely and accurate collection of financial and resident profile data will enable us to maximize revenue through careful leasing decisions and financial management. We currently employ a proprietary company-wide intranet using a digital network with high-speed digital lines. This network connects all of our communities and offices to central servers in Alexandria, Virginia, providing access to our associates and to AvalonBay's corporate information throughout the country from all locations. We are currently engaged in the development of an innovative on-site property management system and a leasing automation system to enable management to capture, review and analyze data to a greater extent than is possible using existing commercial software. We have entered into a formal joint venture agreement, in the form of a limited liability company agreement, with United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc., another public multifamily real estate company, to continue development of these systems and system software, which are collectively referred to in this discussion as the "system." The system development process is currently managed by our employees, who have significant related project management experience, and the employees of the joint venturer. The actual programming and documentation of the system is being conducted by our employees, the employees of our joint venturer and third party consultants under the supervision of these experienced project managers. We currently expect that the total development costs over a three-year period will be approximately $8.0 million including hardware costs and expenses, the costs of employees and related overhead, and the costs of engaging third party consultants. These development costs will generally be shared on an equal basis by our joint venture partner and us, although we may fund 60% of some costs. Once developed, we intend to use the property management system in place of current property management information software for which we pay a license fee to third parties, and we intend to use the leasing automation system to make the lease application process easier for residents and more efficient for us to manage. We currently project that the property management system will undergo an on-site test (i.e., a "beta test") during the last half of 2000 and that the system will be functional and implemented during early 2001. We believe that when implemented the system will result in cost savings due to increased data reliability and efficiencies in management time and overhead, and that these savings will largely offset the expense associated with amortizing the system development costs and maintaining the software. We also believe that it is possible that other real estate companies may desire to use the system concept and system software that we are developing and that therefore there may be an opportunity to recover, in the future, a portion of our investment by licensing the system to others and/or admitting one or more other real estate companies to the joint venture. However, at the present time these potential cost savings and ancillary revenue are speculative, and we cannot assure that the system will provide sufficient benefits to offset the cost of development and maintenance. We have never before engaged in the development of systems or system software on this scale and have never licensed a system concept or system software to others. There are a variety of risks associated with the development of the system, both for internal use and for potential sale or licensing to third parties. Among the principal risks associated with this undertaking are the following: - we may not be able to maintain the schedule or budget that we have projected for the development and implementation of the system; - we may be unable to implement the system with the functionality and efficiencies we desire on commercially reasonable terms; - we may decide not to endeavor to license the system to other enterprises, the system may not be attractive to other enterprises, and we may not be able to effectively manage the licensing of the system to other enterprises; and 31 33 - the system may not provide AvalonBay with meaningful cost savings or a meaningful source of ancillary revenues. The occurrence of any of the events described above could prevent us from achieving increased efficiencies, realizing revenue growth produced by ancillary revenues or recovering our initial investment. Natural Disasters Many of our West Coast communities are located in the general vicinity of active earthquake faults. In July 1998, we obtained a seismic risk analysis from an engineering firm which estimated the probable maximum damage for each of the 60 West Coast communities that we owned at that time and for each of the five West Coast communities under development at that time. The seismic risk analysis was obtained for each individual community and for all of those communities combined. To establish a probable maximum damage, the engineers first define a severe earthquake event for the applicable geographic area, which is an earthquake that has only a 10% likelihood of occurring over a 50-year period. The probable maximum damage is determined as the structural and architectural damage and business interruption loss that is estimated to have only a 10% probability of being exceeded in the event of such an earthquake. Because a significant number of our communities are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, the engineers' analysis defined an earthquake on the Hayward Fault with a Richter Scale magnitude of 7.1 as a severe earthquake with a 10% probability of occurring within a 50-year period. The engineers then established an aggregate probable maximum damage at that time of $113 million for the 60 West Coast communities that we owned at that time and the five West Coast communities then under development. The $113 million probable maximum damage for those communities was a probable maximum level that the engineers expected to be exceeded only 10% of the time in the event of such a severe earthquake. The actual aggregate probable maximum damage could be higher or lower as a result of variations in soil classifications and structural vulnerabilities. For each community, the engineers' analysis calculated an individual probable maximum damage as a percentage of the community's replacement cost and projected revenues. We cannot assure you that: - an earthquake would not cause damage or losses greater than the probable maximum damage assessments indicate; - future probable maximum damage levels will not be higher than the current probable maximum damage levels described above for our communities located on the West Coast; or - acquisitions or developments after July 1998 will not have probable maximum damage assessments indicating the possibility of greater damage or losses than currently indicated. In August 1999, we renewed our earthquake insurance, both for physical damage and lost revenue, with respect to all communities we owned at that time and all of the communities under development. For any single occurrence, we have in place $75,000,000 of coverage with a five percent deductible. The five percent deductible is subject to a minimum of $100,000 and a maximum of $25,000,000 per occurrence. In addition, our general liability and property insurance program provides coverage for public liability and fire damage. In the event an uninsured disaster or a loss in excess of insured limits were to occur, we could lose our capital invested in the affected community, as well as anticipated future revenue from that community. We would also continue to be obligated to repay any mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the community. Any such loss could materially and adversely affect our business and our financial condition and results of operations. 32 34 Development Communities As of March 31, 2000, we had nine Development Communities under construction. We expect these Development Communities, when completed, to add a total of 2,473 apartment homes to our portfolio for a total capitalized cost, including land acquisition costs, of approximately $410.9 million. Statements regarding the future development or performance of the Development Communities are forward-looking statements. We cannot assure you that: - we will complete the Development Communities; - our budgeted costs or estimates of occupancy rates will be realized; - our schedule of leasing start dates or construction completion dates will be achieved; or - future developments will realize returns comparable to our past developments. You should carefully review the discussion under "Risks of Development and Redevelopment" below. We hold a fee simple ownership interest in eight of the Development Communities and a membership interest in a limited liability company that holds a fee simple interest in one Development Community. The following table presents a summary of the Development Communities: Number of Budgeted Estimated Estimated apartment cost (1) Construction Initial completion stabilization homes ($ millions) start occupancy (2) date date (3) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Avalon Willow Mamaroneck, NY 227 $46.8 Q2 1997 Q1 1999 Q2 2000 Q3 2000 2. Avalon Essex Peabody, MA 154 $21.4 Q2 1999 Q2 2000 Q3 2000 Q4 2000 3. Avalon at Florham Park Florham Park, NJ 270 $41.0 Q2 1999 Q1 2000 Q2 2001 Q4 2001 4. Avalon River Mews Edgewater, NJ 408 $75.6 Q3 1999 Q1 2001 Q3 2001 Q1 2002 5. Avalon Haven North Haven, CT 128 $14.4 Q3 1999 Q2 2000 Q4 2000 Q1 2001 6. Avalon Bellevue Bellevue, WA 202 $29.9 Q4 1999 Q1 2001 Q2 2001 Q3 2001 7. Avalon at Arlington Square I Arlington, VA 510 $69.9 Q4 1999 Q4 2000 Q4 2001 Q3 2002 8. Avalon on the Sound (4) New Rochelle, NY 412 $92.1 Q4 1999 Q3 2001 Q4 2001 Q3 2002 9. Avalon Estates Hull, MA 162 $19.8 Q4 1999 Q4 2000 Q2 2001 Q4 2001 ------------------------------- Total 2,473 $410.9 =============================== (1) Total budgeted cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be incurred to develop the respective Development Community, including land acquisition costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees determined in accordance with GAAP. (2) Future initial occupancy dates are estimates. (3) Stabilized operations is defined as the first full quarter of 95% or greater occupancy after completion of construction. (4) This community will be developed under a joint venture structure with third party financing. AvalonBay's portion of the Budgeted Cost is expected to be $13.3 million. 33 35 Redevelopment Communities As of March 31, 2000, we had six communities under redevelopment. We expect the total budgeted cost to complete these Redevelopment Communities, including the cost of acquisition and redevelopment, to be approximately $263.1 million, of which approximately $68.1 million is the additional capital invested or expected to be invested above the original purchase cost. Statements regarding the future redevelopment or performance of the Redevelopment Communities are forward-looking statements. We have found that the cost to redevelop an existing apartment community is more difficult to budget than the cost to develop a new community. Accordingly, we expect that actual costs may vary over a wider range than for a new development community. We cannot assure you that we will meet our schedules for redevelopment completion, or that we will meet our budgeted costs, either individually or in the aggregate. See the discussion under "Risks of Development and Redevelopment" below. The following presents a summary of Redevelopment Communities: ($ millions) Number of --------------------------------- Estimated apartment Acquisition Total Reconstruction Reconstruction restabilized homes cost cost (1) start completion (2) operations (3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Avalon Greenbriar (4) Renton, WA 421 $25.3 $35.7 Q3 1998 Q2 2000 Q2 2000 2. Avalon at Mission Bay San Diego, CA 564 $43.8 $57.3 Q3 1998 Q2 2000 Q3 2000 3. Avalon at Creekside Mountain View, CA 294 $29.0 $39.8 Q2 1999 Q3 2000 Q4 2000 4. Laguna Brisas Laguna Niguel, CA 176 $17.2 $21.2 Q3 1999 Q2 2000 Q4 2000 5. Avalon at Cortez Hill San Diego, CA 293 $24.4 $33.8 Q1 2000 Q1 2001 Q2 2001 6. Lakeside Burbank, CA 748 $55.3 $75.3 Q1 2000 Q1 2002 Q2 2002 -------------------------------------------------- Total 2,496 $195.0 $263.1 ================================================== (1) Total budgeted cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be incurred to redevelop the respective Redevelopment Community, including costs to acquire the community, reconstruction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated redevelopment overhead and other regulatory fees determined in accordance with GAAP. (2) Reconstruction completion dates are estimates. (3) Restabilized operations is defined as the first full quarter of 95% or greater occupancy after completion of reconstruction. (4) Formerly named Avalon Ridge. 34 36 Development Rights As of March 31, 2000, we are considering the development of 34 new apartment communities. These Development Rights range from land owned or under contract for which design and architectural planning has just begun to land under contract or owned by us with completed site plans and drawings where construction can begin almost immediately. We estimate that the successful completion of all of these communities would ultimately add 9,140 upscale apartment homes to our portfolio. At March 31, 2000, the cumulative capitalized costs incurred in pursuit of the 34 Development Rights, including the cost of land acquired in connection with seven of the Development Rights, was approximately $74.0 million, of which $46.0 million was land. Substantially all of these apartment homes will offer features like those offered by the communities we currently own. We generally hold Development Rights through options to acquire land, although one Development Right located in New Canaan, Connecticut is controlled through a joint venture partnership that owns the land. The properties comprising the Development Rights are in different stages of the due diligence and regulatory approval process. The decisions as to which of the Development Rights to pursue, if any, or to continue to pursue once an investment in a Development Right is made are business judgments that we make after we perform financial, demographic and other analysis. Finally, we currently intend to limit the percentage of debt used to finance new developments in order to maintain our general historical practice with respect to the proportion of debt in our capital structure. Therefore, other financing alternatives may be required to finance the development of those Development Rights scheduled to start construction after April 1, 2000. Although the development of any particular Development Right cannot be assured, we believe that the Development Rights, in the aggregate, present attractive potential opportunities for future development and growth of our FFO. Statements regarding the future development of the Development Rights are forward-looking statements. We cannot assure you that: - we will succeed in obtaining zoning and other necessary governmental approvals or the financing required to develop these communities, or that we will decide to develop any particular community; or - if we undertake construction of any particular community, that we will complete construction at the total budgeted cost assumed in the financial projections below. The following presents a summary of the 34 Development Rights we are currently pursuing: 35 37 Total Estimated budgeted number costs Location of homes ($ millions) ------------------------ ---------------- ----------------- 1. Mountain View, CA (1) 211 60 2. San Jose, CA (1) 217 42 3. Stamford, CT 323 60 4. Freehold, NJ 296 35 5. Orange, CT (1) 168 18 6. New Canaan, CT (1) (2) 104 26 7. Darien, CT (1) 189 37 8. Yonkers, NY 256 35 9. Greenburgh - II, NY 500 83 10. Greenburgh - III, NY 266 44 11. Arlington II, VA (1) 332 40 12. Hopewell, NJ 280 34 13. Port Jefferson, NY 232 28 14. Yorktown, NY 396 47 15. Marlborough, MA 202 22 16. Newtown, CT 304 34 17. Wilton, CT 115 21 18. North Potomac, MD 564 64 19. Los Angeles, CA 241 39 20. Weymouth, MA 304 33 21. San Diego, CA (1) 378 54 22. Long Island City, NY 372 102 23. Coram, NY 450 61 24. Westborough, MA 386 44 25. Lawrence, NJ 342 38 26. Salem, MA 176 20 27. Wilmington, MA 120 16 28. North Bethesda, MD 414 42 29. San Francisco, CA 250 70 30. Andover, MA 156 20 31. St. James, NY 112 16 32. Seattle, WA 100 19 33. Washington, D.C. 209 41 34. Seattle, WA 175 31 ---------------- ----------------- Totals 9,140 $1,376 ================ ================= (1) AvalonBay owns land, but construction has not yet begun. (2) The land currently is owned by a limited partnership in which AvalonBay is a majority partner. It is currently anticipated that the land seller will retain a minority limited partner interest. 36 38 Risks of Development and Redevelopment We intend to continue to pursue the development and redevelopment of apartment home communities. Our development and redevelopment activities may be exposed to the following industry risks: - we may abandon opportunities we have already begun to explore based on further review of, or changes in, financial, demographic, environmental or other factors; - we may encounter liquidity constraints, including the unavailability of financing on favorable terms for the development or redevelopment of a community; - we may be unable to obtain, or we may experience delays in obtaining, all necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy, and other required governmental permits and authorizations; - we may incur construction or reconstruction costs for a community that exceed our original estimates due to increased materials, labor or other expenses, which could make completion or redevelopment of the community uneconomical; - occupancy rates and rents at a newly completed or redevelopment community may fluctuate depending on a number of factors, including market and general economic conditions, and may not be sufficient to make the community profitable; and - we may be unable to complete construction and lease-up on schedule, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs. The occurrence of any of the events described above could adversely affect our ability to achieve our projected yields on communities under development or redevelopment and could affect our payment of distributions to our stockholders. Construction costs are projected by us based on market conditions prevailing in the community's market at the time our budgets are prepared and reflect changes to those market conditions that we anticipated at that time. Although we attempt to anticipate changes in market conditions, we cannot predict with certainty what those changes will be. Construction costs have been increasing and, for some of our Development Communities, the total construction costs have been or are expected to be higher than the original budget. Total budgeted cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be incurred to develop the respective Development or Redevelopment Community, including: - land and/or property acquisition costs; - construction costs; - real estate taxes; - capitalized interest; - loan fees; - permits; - professional fees; - allocated development overhead; and - other regulatory fees determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Nonetheless, because of increases in prevailing market rents we believe that, in the aggregate, we will still achieve our targeted projected yield (i.e., return on invested capital) for those communities experiencing costs in excess of the original budget. We believe that we could experience similar increases in construction costs and market rents with respect to other development communities resulting in total construction costs that exceed original budgets. Likewise, costs to redevelop communities that have been acquired have, in some cases, exceeded our original estimates and similar increases in costs may be experienced in the future. We cannot assure that market rents in effect at the time new development communities or repositioned communities complete lease-up will be sufficient to fully offset the effects of any increased construction or reconstruction costs. 37 39 Capitalized Interest In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, we capitalize interest expense during construction or reconstruction until a building obtains a certificate of occupancy. Thereafter, the interest allocated to that completed building within the community is expensed. Capitalized interest totaled $3,494,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and $7,283,000 for the three months ended March 31, 1999. 38 40 PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED) Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Not Applicable PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings We are involved in certain ordinary routine litigation incidental to the conduct of our business. In addition, as reported in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, we are currently involved in litigation with York Hunter Construction, Inc., and National Union Fire Insurance Company. While the outcome of such litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect any current litigation, including the litigation with York Hunter and National Union, to have a material effect on our business or financial condition. Item 2. Changes in Securities On February 28, 2000, the Company filed a Form 8-A/A (i) to file an amendment to the Company's Shareholder Rights Agreement that affects the rights of holders of the Company's Preferred Stock Purchase Rights and (ii) to describe the terms of such Shareholder Rights Agreement, as amended. The description set forth in such Form 8-A/A is incorporated herein by reference. During the three months ended March 31, 2000, the Company issued 7,048 shares of common stock in exchange for units of limited partnership held by a limited partner of Avalon DownREIT V, L.P., a DownREIT partnership subsidiary of the Company. These shares were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. The Company is relying on the exemption based upon factual representations received from the limited partner who received these shares. Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities None Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders None Item 5. Other Information None Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K (a) EXHIBITS Exhibit No. Description - ----------- ----------- 3(i).1 -- Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Articles of Incorporation of AvalonBay Communities (the "Company"), dated as of June 4, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i).1 to Form 10-Q of the Company filed August 14, 1998.) 3(i).2 -- Articles of Amendment, dated as of October 2, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1(ii) to Form 8-K of the Company filed on October 6, 1998.) 39 41 3(i).3 -- Articles Supplementary, dated as of October 13, 1998, relating to the 8.70% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Form 8-A of the Company filed October 14, 1998.) 3(ii).1 -- Bylaws of the Company, as amended and restated, dated as of July 24, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii).1 to Form 10-Q of the Company filed August 14, 1998.) 3(ii).2 -- Amendment to Bylaws of the Company, dated February 10, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii).2 to Form 10-K of the Company filed March 31, 1999.) 3(ii).3 -- Amendment to Bylaws of the Company, dated May 5, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii).3 to Form 10-Q of the Company filed on August 16, 1999.) 4.1 -- Indenture of Avalon Properties, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Avalon Properties") dated as of September 18, 1995. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K of Avalon Properties dated September 18, 1995.) 4.2 -- First Supplemental Indenture of Avalon Properties dated as of September 18, 1995. (Incorporated by reference to Avalon Properties' Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 18, 1995.) 4.3 -- Second Supplemental Indenture of Avalon Properties dated as of December 16, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to Avalon Properties' Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 26, 1998.) 4.4 -- Third Supplemental Indenture of Avalon Properties dated as of January 22, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to Avalon Properties' Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26, 1998.) 4.5 -- Indenture, dated as of January 16, 1998, between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K of the Company filed on January 21, 1998.) 4.6 -- First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 20, 1998, between the Company and the Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K of the Company filed on January 21, 1998.) 4.7 -- Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 7, 1998, between the Company and the Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K of the Company filed on July 9, 1998.) 4.8 -- Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 21, 1998 between the Company and the Trustee, including forms of Floating Rate Note and Fixed Rate Note (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed on December 21, 1998.) 4.9 -- Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan of the Company filed on September 14, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to Form 3-S of the Company, File No. 333-87063.) 4.10 -- Amendment to the Company's Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan filed on December 17, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to the Prospectus Supplement filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 on December 17, 1999.) 40 42 4.11 -- Shareholder Rights Agreement, dated as of March 9, 1998 (the "Rights Agreement"), between the Company and First Union National Bank (as successor to American Stock Transfer and Trust Company) as Rights Agent (including the form of Rights Certificate as Exhibit B). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-A of the Company filed March 11, 1998.) 4.12 -- Amendment No. 1 to the Rights Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2000, between the Company and the Rights Agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Form 8-A/A of the Company filed February 28, 2000.) 10.1 -- Mutual Release and Separation Agreement, dated as of March 24, 2000, between the Company and Gilbert M. Meyer. 10.2 -- Retirement Agreement, dated as of March 24, 2000, between the Company and Gilbert M. Meyer. 10.3 -- Consulting Agreement, dated as of March 24, 2000, between the Company and Gilbert M. Meyer. 12.1 -- Statements re: Computation of Ratios. 27.1 -- Financial Data Schedule. (b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K On March 10, 2000, the Company filed a report on Form 8-K with respect to Item 5 thereof (Other Event) to report the mailing of a letter to stockholders and to file a copy of such letter. 41 43 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. Date: May 15, 2000 /s/: RICHARD L. MICHAUX ----------------------------------------------- Richard L. Michaux President, Chief Executive Officer and Director Date: May 15, 2000 /s/: THOMAS J. SARGEANT ----------------------------------------------- Thomas J. Sargeant Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 42