1
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] Confidential, for Use of the
Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12
PFSweb, Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
2
PFSweb, INC.
500 NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY
PLANO, TEXAS 75074
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
PFSweb, Inc. (the "Company"), which will be held at the Stonebriar Country Club,
Frisco, Texas, on Friday, September 14, 2001 at 10:00 a.m. (local time).
At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to elect a director,
approve an amendment to the Company's 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and
ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent auditors.
Information about these matters is contained in the attached Proxy Statement.
The Company's management would greatly appreciate your attendance at the
Annual Meeting. HOWEVER, WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING,
IT IS MOST IMPORTANT THAT YOUR SHARES BE REPRESENTED. Accordingly, please sign,
date and return the enclosed proxy card which will indicate your vote upon the
matters to be considered. If you do attend the meeting and desire to vote in
person, you may do so by withdrawing your proxy at that time.
I sincerely hope you will be able to attend the Annual Meeting, and I look
forward to seeing you on September 14, 2001.
Sincerely,
/s/ MARK C. LAYTON
Mark C. Layton
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer
July 26, 2001
3
PFSweb, INC.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
SEPTEMBER 14, 2001
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of PFSweb, Inc. (the "Company") will be
held on Friday, September 14, 2001 at 10:00 a.m. at the Stonebriar Country Club,
Frisco, Texas, for the following purposes:
1. To elect one Class II director;
2. To consider and act upon a proposal to amend the Company's 2000
Employee Stock Purchase Plan so as to increase the number of shares
thereunder;
3. To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent
auditors for the nine month transition period ending December 31, 2001; and
4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting or any adjournment thereof.
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on July 20, 2001 as
the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and
to vote at, the Annual Meeting. Each stockholder, even though he or she may
presently intend to attend the Annual Meeting, is requested to execute and date
the enclosed proxy card and return it without delay in the enclosed postage-paid
envelope. Any stockholder present at the Annual Meeting may withdraw his or her
proxy card and vote in person on each matter properly brought before the Annual
Meeting.
Please sign, date and mail the enclosed proxy in the enclosed envelope
promptly, so that your shares of stock may be represented at the meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors
/s/ HARVEY H. ACHATZ
Harvey H. Achatz
Secretary
Plano, Texas
July 26, 2001
4
PFSweb, INC.
500 NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY
PLANO, TEXAS 75074
(972) 881-2900
PROXY STATEMENT
This Proxy Statement is furnished to the stockholders of PFSweb, Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("PFSweb" or the "Company"), in connection with the
solicitation of proxies for use at the Company's Annual Meeting of Stockholders
(the "Annual Meeting"), to be held at the Stonebriar Country Club, Frisco,
Texas, on Friday, September 14, 2001, at 10:00 a.m. and at any and all
adjournments thereof.
This solicitation is being made on behalf of the Board of Directors of the
Company. This Proxy Statement, Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the
enclosed proxy card and the Company's 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K were first
mailed to stockholders on or about July 31, 2001.
The shares represented by a proxy in the enclosed form, if such proxy is
properly executed and is received by the Company prior to or at the Annual
Meeting, will be voted in accordance with the specifications made thereon.
Proxies on which no specification has been made by the stockholder will be
voted:
(i) in favor of the election of the nominee to the Board of Directors
listed in this Proxy Statement;
(ii) in favor of the amendment to the Company's 2000 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan so as to increase the number of shares thereunder; and
(iii) to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's
independent auditors for the nine month transition period ending December
31, 2001.
Any proxy given by a stockholder may be revoked at any time before its
exercise by sending a subsequently dated proxy or by giving written notice of
revocation, in each case, to the Company's Secretary, at the Company's principal
executive offices at the address set forth above. Stockholders who attend the
Annual Meeting in person may withdraw their proxies at any time before their
shares are voted by voting their shares in person.
Stockholders of record at the close of business on July 20, 2001 (the
"Record Date") are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. On
the Record Date, the issued and outstanding voting securities of the Company
consisted of 18,114,092 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share (the
"Common Stock"), each of which is entitled to one vote on all matters which may
properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.
The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders
of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock is necessary to
constitute a quorum. Each item presented herein to be voted on at the Annual
Meeting must be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the holders of
the number of shares present either in person or represented by proxy. The
inspector of elections appointed by the Company will count all votes cast, in
person or by submission of a properly executed proxy, before the closing of the
polls at the meeting. Abstentions and "broker non-votes" (nominees holding
shares for beneficial owners who have not voted on a specific matter) will be
treated as present for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at
the Annual Meeting. However, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no
effect on the vote, because the vote required is a majority of the votes
actually cast (assuming the presence of a quorum).
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Except as otherwise noted, all references in this Proxy Statement to the
Company's fiscal year mean the 12 month period ending on March 31 of such year
(i.e., the 2001 fiscal year is the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001). The
Company recently determined to change its fiscal year-end from March 31 to
December 31.
5
Prior to July 6, 2000, the Company was a subsidiary of Daisytek
International Corporation ("Daisytek"). In December 1999, the Company completed
an initial public offering (the "Offering") of approximately 19.9% of its
outstanding common stock as the first step in the spin-off and separation of the
Company from Daisytek. In order to effect this spin-off, on June 8, 2000,
Daisytek declared a dividend on its common stock consisting of a total of
14,305,000 shares of PFSweb common stock owned by Daisytek (the "Distribution"
or "spin-off"). The dividend was paid at the close of business on July 6, 2000
to the holders of record of Daisytek common stock as of the close of business on
June 19, 2000, in the amount of 0.81 of a share of PFSweb common stock for each
share of outstanding Daisytek common stock. See "Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions -- The Company's Relationship with Daisytek."
ITEM I
ELECTION OF DIRECTOR
The Board of Directors presently consists of six members which are divided
into three classes. Each class serves three years, with the terms of office of
the respective classes expiring in successive years. The term of the Class II
director expires at the Annual Meeting. The director elected as a Class II
director at the Annual Meeting will have a term of three years. The nominee as a
Class II director is Chris Yates who has been nominated and recommended by the
Board of Directors. If elected, Mr. Yates is expected to serve until the
Company's 2004 annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor is elected
and qualified. The shares represented by proxies in the accompanying form will
be voted for the election of this nominee unless authority to so vote is
withheld. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that such nominee will
not serve if elected, but if he should become unavailable to serve as a
director, and if the Board designates a substitute nominee, the person named as
proxies will vote for the substitute nominee designated by the Board. The
director will be elected by a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting.
The following information, which has been provided by the individuals
named, sets forth the nominee for election to the Board of Directors and the
continuing Class I and III directors, such person's name, age, principal
occupation or employment during at least the past five years, the name of the
corporation or other organization, if any, in which such occupation or
employment is carried on and the period during which such person has served as a
director of the Company.
DIRECTOR STANDING FOR ELECTION
CLASS II
TERM EXPIRES AT THE 2004 ANNUAL MEETING
Christopher Yates, age 46, has served as Executive Vice President, Chief
Sales and Marketing Officer and Director of PFSweb since its inception. Mr.
Yates previously served as a Director and Senior Vice President -- Business
Development of Daisytek, a position he held from 1996 to 2000, with primary
responsibility for the Company's business unit. Mr. Yates served as Vice
President -- Business Development of Daisytek from November 1995 to February
1996, as Vice President -- Marketing from January 1994 to November 1995, as Vice
President -- Sales from 1988 to 1994 and in various other sales capacities for
Daisytek since 1982.
2
6
DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE
CLASS III
TERM EXPIRES AT THE 2002 ANNUAL MEETING
Mark C. Layton, age 41, has served as Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer of PFSweb since its inception. Mr. Layton previously
held the following positions with Daisytek: Chairman of the Board from September
1999 to October 2000; President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating
Officer from April 1997 to February 2000; Director from 1988 to October 2000;
President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer from 1993 to
April 1997; Executive Vice President from 1990 to 1993; and Vice
President -- Operations from 1988 to 1990. Prior to joining Daisytek, Mr. Layton
served as a management consultant with Arthur Andersen & Co., S.C. for six years
through 1988 specializing in wholesale and retail distribution and technology.
Mr. Layton is also a director of PC Mall, Inc. a direct marketer of computer
products.
Timothy M. Murray, age 49, has served as a non-employee Director of the
Company since its inception. Mr. Murray is a Principal of William Blair &
Company, L.L.C., an investment banking firm he joined in 1979. Mr. Murray is a
director of several privately held corporations.
Dr. Neil W. Jacobs, age 66, has served as a non-employee Director of the
Company since July 2000. Dr. Jacobs is a professor of computer information
systems and management at Northern Arizona University ("NAU") and a technology
industry veteran. Dr. Jacobs' academic area of expertise includes strategic
management issues and the role information technology plays in support of
strategy and operations. From 1996 to 1999, Dr. Jacobs served as associate dean
of the College of Business Administration at NAU.
DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE
CLASS I
TERM EXPIRES AT THE 2003 ANNUAL MEETING
David I. Beatson, age 53, has served as a non-employee Director since
November 2000. From June 2000 to July 2001, Mr. Beatson served as president, CEO
and chairman of Supply Links, Inc., an Internet-based B2B global supply chain
network that links customers to multiple transportation modes and service
providers through a single platform. From July 1998 to June 2000, Mr. Beatson
served as chairman, president and CEO of Circle International Group, Inc., a
global transportation and logistics company. From 1991 to June 1994, Mr. Beatson
served as vice-president of sales and marketing and then from June 1994 until
July 1998 as president and CEO of Emery Worldwide, a global transportation and
logistics company. Prior to 1991, Mr. Beatson held several management positions
in the logistics and transportation industry, including American Airlines and CF
Airfreight. Mr. Beatson also currently serves as an industry representative
member of the Executive Advisory Committee to the National Industrial
Transportation League, to which the Air Freight Association elected him in 1995.
He also serves on several industry boards including the Council of Logistics
Management.
James F. Reilly, age 42, has served as a non-employee Director of the
Company since its inception. Mr. Reilly is a Managing Director of JPMorgan H&Q,
a division of J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., an investment banking firm. Mr.
Reilly was previously a Managing Director in the Technology Group of Warburg
Dillon Read, the global investment banking division of UBS AG. Mr. Reilly was
associated with Warburg Dillon Read or one of its predecessor companies from
1983 to 1999 and specialized in corporate finance advisory work for a broad
range of technology companies.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
In addition to the individuals named above, the following are the names,
ages and positions of the other executive officers of the Company:
Steven S. Graham, age 49, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Technology Officer of the Company since its inception. Mr. Graham previously
served as Senior Vice President of Information
3
7
Technologies and Chief Information Officer of Daisytek, a position he held from
1996 to 2000. Prior to joining Daisytek, Mr. Graham was employed by Ingram
Micro, a major microcomputer distributor. Mr. Graham has 28 years of experience
in the information-technology field.
Thomas J. Madden, age 39, has served as Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company since its inception. Mr. Madden
previously served as Chief Financial Officer of Daisytek from 1997 to 2000, as
Vice President -- Finance, Treasurer and as Chief Accounting Officer of Daisytek
from 1994 to 2000 and as Controller of Daisytek from 1992 to 1994. From 1983 to
1992, Mr. Madden served in various capacities with Arthur Andersen & Co., S.C.,
including financial consulting and audit manager.
C. Clifford Defee, age 42, has served as Executive Vice
President -- Operations and Client Solutions and Chief Operating Officer of the
Company since its inception. From 1997 to 2000 Mr. Defee served as Vice
President -- Operations of Daisytek, with primary responsibility for the
Company's business unit. From 1984 to 1997, Mr. Defee served as a management
consultant with Andersen Consulting, LLP specializing in retail distribution.
Martin L. Anderson, age 35, has served as Vice President -- Customer
Satisfaction of the Company since its inception. From 1998 to 2000 Mr. Anderson
served as Vice President -- Call Center Operations of Daisytek, with primary
responsibility for the Company's business unit and has served in various other
capacities for Daisytek since 1990.
Lindsley D. Medlin Jr., age 37, has served as Vice President -- Global
Marketing since 2000. Mr. Medlin has been with the Company since its inception
and previously served as Vice President and Managing Director of European
Operations. Mr. Medlin previously served as a Managing Director of Daisytek,
with primary responsibility for the Company's European business unit and served
in various other capacities for Daisytek since 1988.
Scott R. Talley, age 36, has served as Vice President -- International
Distribution for the Company since its inception. Mr. Talley previously served
as Vice President -- Distribution of Daisytek, with primary responsibility for
the Company's business unit and served in various other capacities for Daisytek
since 1991.
Harvey H. Achatz, age 60, has served as Vice President -- Administration
and Secretary of the Company since its inception. Mr. Achatz previously served
as Vice President -- Administration and Secretary of Daisytek from 1993 and 1984
to 2000, respectively, as Vice President -- Finance from 1985 to 1993, as
Controller from 1981 to 1985 and as a Director from 1984 to 1990.
Michael G. Willoughby, age 37, has served as Vice President -- E-Commerce
Technologies of the Company since 1999. Mr. Willoughby served as President and
Chief Executive Officer of Design Technologies, Inc., an e-commerce software
development firm from 1994 to 1999. Prior to founding Design Technologies, Inc.,
Mr. Willoughby served as President and Chief Executive Officer of a mid-sized
development services company.
Valarie J. Remmers, age 40, has served as Vice President -- Information
Technology of the Company since November 1999. From 1998 to 1999 Ms. Remmers
served as Director of Information Technology of Daisytek, with primary
responsibility for the Company's business unit. From 1995 to 1998 Ms. Remmers
served in various capacities at PageNet in its information technology
department. Prior to 1995, Ms. Remmers served in various capacities at Sprint
and Andersen Consulting LLP. Ms. Remmers has over 19 years of experience in the
information-technology field.
Cynthia D. Almond, age 33, has served as Vice President -- Client Services
of the Company since March 2001. From 1999 to 2001, Ms. Almond served as
Director of Account Management. From 1991 to 1999, Ms. Almond served in various
marketing, product management and sales capabilities for Daisytek.
MEETINGS OF THE BOARD
The Board of Directors met ten times during the Company's 2001 fiscal year.
No director attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the
Board and Committees on which such director served.
4
8
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
The Board of Directors currently has standing Audit, Compensation and Stock
Option Committees.
The Audit Committee reviews, acts on and reports to the Board of Directors
with respect to various auditing and accounting matters, including the selection
of the Company's auditors, the scope of the annual audits, fees to be paid to
the auditors, the performance of the Company's independent auditors and the
accounting practices of the Company. The Board has adopted a written audit
committee charter (attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix I) setting out
the audit-related functions of the Audit Committee. During fiscal year 2001 the
members of the Audit Committee were Messrs. Murray, Beatson and Jacobs, and the
current members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Reilly, Beatson and Jacobs.
None of the members of the Audit Committee is, or ever has been, an officer or
employee of the Company and all of whom are considered "independent" for
purposes of the National Association of Securities Dealers' listing standards.
The Audit Committee met three times during fiscal year 2001.
The Compensation Committee approves, or in some cases recommends, to the
Board, remuneration and compensation arrangements involving the Company's
executive officers and other key employees. During fiscal year 2001 and the
current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Murray and Reilly, who
are non-employee directors. The Compensation Committee also serves as the Stock
Option Committee to administer the Company's employee stock option and purchase
plans. The Compensation Committee and Stock Option Committee met once in fiscal
year 2001.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
In June 1999 the Company adopted a Non-Employee Director Stock Option and
Retainer Plan (the "Non-Employee Director Plan"). As of the date of the adoption
of the Non-Employee Director Plan, each non-employee director received an option
to purchase 35,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $10.45 per
share. The Non-Employee Director Plan also provides for the future issuance to
each non-employee director of options to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock
as of the date of each annual meeting of stockholders. Accordingly, in September
2000, each non-employee director received an option to purchase 10,000 shares of
common stock with an exercise price of $2.69 per share. In addition, the
Non-Employee Director Plan provides that if and to the extent the Board
authorizes the payment of non-employee director retainer fees, each non-employee
director may elect to receive payment of such fees in shares of Common Stock in
lieu of cash. Currently, non-employee directors do not receive retainer fees for
services rendered as non-employee directors.
All options to be issued to non-employee directors under the Non-Employee
Director Plan are non-qualified options for federal income tax purposes and have
an exercise price equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock as
of the date of the annual meeting upon which such option is granted. All options
have a ten year term and are subject to a one year vesting schedule.
Generally, unless the Non-Employee Director Plan administrator otherwise
provides, options are non-transferable other than by will or the laws of descent
and distribution. At the time of any merger, consolidation, reorganization,
recapitalization, stock dividend, stock split, or other change in the corporate
structure or capitalization affecting the Company's common stock, the
Non-Employee Director Plan administrator will make appropriate adjustments to
the exercise price, number and kind of shares to be issued under the
Non-Employee Director Plan and any outstanding options. Unless terminated
earlier, the Non-Employee Director Plan will terminate ten years from its
adoption, and no stock options will be granted after the Non-Employee Director
Plan terminates. The Board of Directors has the authority to amend, modify,
suspend or terminate the Non-Employee Director Plan at any time.
During fiscal year 2001, the Company also issued non-employee directors
additional options to purchase shares of common stock. Mr. Beatson received an
option to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $1.16
per share. Dr. Jacobs received an option to purchase 25,000 shares of common
stock with an exercise price of $1.92 per share. Messrs. Murray and Reilly each
received an option to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock with an exercise
price of $1.92 per share.
5
9
Directors who are also employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries
receive no remuneration for serving as directors or Committee members.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the compensation paid or accrued by the
Company to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and to each of the four most
highly compensated executive officers of the Company for services rendered to
the Company during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG-TERM
COMPENSATION
AWARDS
------------
NUMBER OF
ANNUAL COMPENSATION SECURITIES
------------------------ UNDERLYING ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPLE POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS OPTIONS(2) COMPENSATION(1)
- --------------------------- ---- ------- ------- ------------ ---------------
Mark C. Layton......................... 2001 363,603 28,125 554,056 20,963
Chairman, President, 2000 337,857 -- 90,000 22,248
Chief Executive Officer 1999 337,818 175,160 412,080 18,063
Christopher Yates...................... 2001 291,349 15,625 432,690 8,308
Executive Vice President -- 2000 263,361 -- 85,000 8,013
Chief Sales and Marketing Officer 1999 263,361 57,803 222,026 9,534
Steven S. Graham....................... 2001 230,640 15,625 567,449 5,543
Executive Vice President -- 2000 200,950 -- 75,000 7,783
Chief Technology Officer 1999 200,950 57,803 186,302 9,489
Thomas J. Madden....................... 2001 200,000 13,750 294,673 5,060
Executive Vice President -- 2000 153,720 -- 85,000 4,690
Chief Financial Officer 1999 124,000 35,032 185,980 5,638
C. Clifford Defee...................... 2001 206,115 10,625 241,022 1,389
Executive Vice President -- 2000 194,709 -- 80,000 1,287
Chief Operating Officer 1999 175,926 -- 110,139 344
- ---------------
(1) All Other Compensation represents compensation in respect of one or more of
the following: personal use of Company automobiles; life insurance premiums
paid by the Company for the benefit of the name executive officer; tax
return preparation services paid by the Company; contributions to 401(k)
accounts paid by the Company; personal travel expenses and relocation costs.
(2) Represents options issued during fiscal years 2001 and 2000 by the Company
to purchase shares of the Company's common stock and options issued during
fiscal year 1999 by Daisytek to purchase shares of Daisytek common stock.
Information in this column (i) for fiscal year 2001 also includes the
following options issued by the Company in July 2000 in connection with the
adjustment and conversion of pre-spin-off Daisytek options into Company
options upon the effective date of the spin-off: Mark C. Layton -- 504,056;
Christopher Yates -- 382,690; Steven S. Graham -- 532,449; Thomas J.
Madden -- 259,673; and C. Clifford Defee -- 206,022 and (ii) for fiscal year
1999 does not reflect the adjustment and conversion of pre-spin-off Daisytek
options into Company options upon the effective date of the spin-off. See
"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions -- Substitute Stock
Options."
6
10
The following table sets forth information with respect to grants of stock
options by the Company to purchase shares of the Company's common stock during
the year ended March 31, 2001 to the named executive officers reflected in the
Summary Compensation Table. Information in this table also includes options
issued by the Company in July 2000 in connection with the adjustment and
conversion of pre-spin-off Daisytek options into Company options upon the
effective date of the spin-off. See "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions -- Substitute Stock Options."
OPTION GRANTS IN FISCAL YEAR 2001
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS
---------------------------------------------------- POTENTIAL REALIZABLE VALUE
NUMBER OF % OF TOTAL AT ASSUMED ANNUAL RATES OF
SECURITIES OPTIONS STOCK PRICE APPRECIATION FOR
UNDERLYING GRANTED TO EXERCISE OPTION TERMS(2)
OPTIONS EMPLOYEES IN PRICE PER EXPIRATION -----------------------------
NAME GRANTS FISCAL YEAR SHARE DATE 5% 10%
- ---- ---------- -------------- --------- ---------- ------------- -------------
Mark C. Layton................ 50,000(1) 1.1% $ 1.92 8-15-10 $ 60,374 $ 152,999
99,593(3) 2.1% 5.78 4-17-07 362,022 917,434
112,585(3) 2.4% 10.58 6-16-08 749,107 1,898,385
291,878(3) 6.2% 5.95 12-15-08 1,092,185 2,767,811
Christopher Yates............. 50,000(1) 1.1% 1.92 8-15-10 60,374 152,999
90,851(3) 1.9% 10.58 6-16-08 604,496 1,531,911
291,839(3) 6.2% 5.95 12-15-08 1,092,039 2,767,441
Steven S. Graham.............. 35,000(1) 0.7% 1.92 8-15-10 42,262 107,099
129,707(3) 2.7% 5.78 4-17-07 471,486 1,194,839
78,477(3) 1.7% 10.58 6-16-08 522,163 1,323,263
324,265(3) 6.9% 5.95 12-15-08 1,213,375 3,074,930
Thomas J. Madden.............. 35,000(1) 0.7% 1.92 8-15-10 42,262 107,099
52,186(3) 1.1% 5.78 4-17-07 189,697 480,729
77,781(3) 1.6% 10.58 6-16-08 517,532 1,311,527
129,706(3) 2.7% 5.95 12-15-08 485,350 1,229,972
C. Clifford Defee............. 35,000(1) 0.7% 1.92 8-15-10 42,262 107,099
12,279(3) 0.3% 5.78 4-17-07 44,634 113,112
38,095(3) 0.8% 10.58 6-16-08 253,473 642,350
155,648(3) 3.3% 5.95 12-15-08 582,423 1,475,974
- ---------------
(1) Subject to three year cumulative vesting schedule.
(2) These are hypothetical values using assumed annual rates of stock price
appreciation as prescribed by the rules of the SEC.
(3) Represents options issued by the Company on July 6, 2000, the effective date
of the spin-off, in connection with the adjustment and conversion of
pre-spin-off Daisytek options into Company options. See "Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions -- Substitute Stock Options." The
closing price of the Company's common stock on such date was $4.25.
7
11
The following table sets forth information concerning the aggregate Company
stock option exercises during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001 and Company
stock option values as of the end of fiscal year 2001 for unexercised Company
stock options held by each of the named executive officers. Information in this
table also includes options issued by the Company in July 2000 in connection
with the adjustment and conversion of pre-spin-off Daisytek options into Company
options upon the effective date of the spin-off. See "Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions -- Substitute Stock Options."
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN FISCAL YEAR 2001
AND FISCAL YEAR END OPTION VALUES
NUMBER OF
NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
SHARES UNEXERCISED OPTIONS IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS
ACQUIRED AT FISCAL YEAR END AT FISCAL YEAR END(1)
ON VALUE --------------------------- ---------------------------
NAME EXERCISE RECEIVED EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
- ---- --------- -------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
Mark C. Layton............. -- $-- 367,656 276,400 $-- $--
Christopher Yates.......... -- -- 254,677 263,013 -- --
Steven S. Graham........... -- -- 374,410 268,039 -- --
Thomas J. Madden........... -- -- 204,261 175,412 -- --
C. Clifford Defee.......... -- -- 154,982 166,040 -- --
- ---------------
(1) None of the options are deemed in-the-money since the exercise price exceeds
$0.97 (the last sale price of the Common Stock on March 30, 2001 as reported
by the Nasdaq National Market).
CHANGE IN CONTROL AND SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS
The Company and each of the officers named above have entered into Change
in Control and Severance Agreements. Under these agreements, and in
consideration of certain commitments of the officer to continue employment, upon
the occurrence of a change in control, all unvested options held by the officer
immediately vest and become exercisable. If the change in control occurs prior
to June 30, 2002, each officer is entitled to receive a bonus amount equal to
the per share price of the Company's common stock payable in connection with
such change in control (or if no per share price is payable in connection with
the change in control, the closing price of the Company's common stock on the
effective date of the change in control) multiplied by a fixed bonus number for
each officer. In addition, during the two year period following a change in
control (whenever occurring), if the employment of the officer is terminated
(other than for cause, death, disability or retirement), or if there is a
material adverse change in the officer's responsibilities, compensation or
benefits to which the officer does not consent, then, in each case, the officer
is entitled to receive from the Company all salary and bonus amounts accrued
through the date of termination plus a severance payment equal to twice the
officer's salary and bonus. If applicable, the officer is also entitled to
receive an additional payment to compensate the officer for any additional
excise tax liability arising by reason of the receipt of such severance or bonus
payment.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
During fiscal year 2001, the members of the Compensation Committee of the
Company's Board of Directors were Timothy M. Murray and James F. Reilly who are
non-employee directors.
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR
2001
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee") is
responsible for approval or recommendation to the Board of Directors of the
compensation arrangements for the Company's senior executive officers. During
fiscal year 2001, the members of the Committee were Timothy M. Murray and James
F. Reilly who are non-employee directors.
The Committee believes that the total compensation of the Company's senior
executive officers should be primarily based on the subjective determination of
the Committee as to the Company's overall financial
8
12
performance and the individual contribution to such performance. The Committee
further believes that a portion of total compensation should consist of
variable, performance-based components such as stock option awards and bonuses,
which it can increase or decrease to reflect its assessment of changes in
corporate and individual performance. These incentive compensation programs are
intended to reinforce management's commitment to enhance profitability and
stockholder value.
In formulating compensation levels and policies for the 2001 fiscal year,
the Committee did not retain an independent compensation consultant, nor did the
Committee rely upon any formal study or review of comparable companies in the
Company's industry.
The Committee annually establishes the salaries to be paid to the Chief
Executive Officer and other senior executive officers during each fiscal year.
Base salaries for senior executive officers are set to reflect the duties and
level of responsibility in each position. In setting salaries, the Committee
takes into account several factors including individual job performance, the
level of responsibility and, to the extent information is available, competitive
pay practices in the Company's industry. The Committee does not assign specific
relative weights to the various factors it considers, however, but rather
exercises its discretion and makes a judgment after considering all factors it
deems relevant.
For fiscal year 2001 and for services rendered to the Company, the base
salary of Mr. Mark Layton, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and
Chief Executive Officer, was $363,603, which represents an increase of 7.6% over
his base salary of $337,857 for the prior fiscal year. The Committee believes
that this amount appropriately reflected Mr. Layton's services to the Company,
although such determination was not based upon any specific qualitative or
quantitative formula.
The Committee also administers the Company's stock option plans and
recommends other option grants which are used to further link executive
compensation to the Company's performance. All options are subject to a
multi-year cumulative vesting schedule and have an exercise price not less than
the fair market value on the date of grant. During fiscal year 2001, Mr. Layton
received options to purchase 50,000 shares of Company common stock at an
exercise price of $1.92 per share.
As part of its overall consideration of executive compensation, the
Committee considers the anticipated tax treatment of various payments and
benefits, including the applicability of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue
Code which provides a limit on the deductibility of compensation for certain
executive officers in excess of $1,000,000 per year. The Committee believes that
no named officer in the Summary Compensation Table had taxable compensation for
fiscal year 2001 in excess of the deduction limit. The Committee intends to
continue to evaluate the impact of this Code provision.
The Committee believes that the policies and programs described above have
supported the Company's business objectives and have contributed to the
Company's performance.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Timothy M. Murray
James F. Reilly
9
13
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001
The Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors is comprised of
three independent directors. The Audit Committee meets at least twice a year.
During fiscal year 2001 the members of the Audit Committee were Messrs. Murray,
Beatson and Jacobs, and the current members of the Audit Committee are Messrs.
Reilly, Beatson and Jacobs.
Management is responsible for the Company's internal controls and the
financial reporting process. The independent accountants ("auditors") are
responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company's consolidated
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and issuing a report thereon. The Audit Committee's responsibility is to monitor
these processes. The Audit Committee meets with the auditors at least twice a
year. In addition, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board the
appointment of the Company's auditors, KPMG, LLP.
The Audit Committee has discussed with the Company's auditors the overall
scope and plans for the independent audit. Management represented to the Audit
Committee that the Company's consolidated financial statements were prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee
has reviewed and discussed with management and the auditors the Company's
audited financial statements, including the auditor's judgments about the
quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the
reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the
financial statements. The Audit Committee also discussed with the auditors the
other matters required by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 "Communication
with Audit Committees" as amended by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 90
"Audit Committee Communications".
The Company's auditors provided to the Audit Committee the written
disclosures required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1
"Independence Discussions with Audit Committees," and the Audit Committee
discussed with the auditors their independence from the Company and its
management.
Based on the Audit Committee's discussion with management and the auditors
and the Audit Committee's review of the representations of management and the
report of the auditors to the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee recommended
to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2001 which was filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
FISCAL 2001 AUDIT COMMITTEE
Timothy M. Murray
David I. Beatson
Dr. Neil W. Jacobs
10
14
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth as of July 20, 2001, certain information
regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company's Common Stock by (i) each
person who is known to the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of the
Common Stock, (ii) each of the Directors and executive officers of the Company
individually and (iii) the Directors and executive officers of the Company as a
group. The information contained in this table reflects "beneficial ownership"
as defined in Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Unless otherwise indicated, the stockholders identified in this
table have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares owned of
record by them. Information in this table regarding options to purchase shares
of the Company's common stock reflects the adjustment and conversion of
outstanding Daisytek options upon the effective date of the spin-off into
Company options. See "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions -- Substitute Stock Options."
NUMBER
NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OF SHARES PERCENT(1)
- ------------------------------------ --------- ----------
Gilder, Gagnon, Howe & Co. LLC(2)........................... 2,601,130 14.4%
1775 Broadway, 26th Floor
New York, NY 10019
Wellington Management Company, LLP(3)....................... 1,765,576 9.7%
75 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Franklin Resources, Inc.(4)................................. 1,023,850 5.7%
777 Mariners Island Boulevard
San Mateo, CA 94409
Mark C. Layton(5)........................................... 310,660 1.7%
Christopher Yates(5)........................................ 36,477 *
Steven S. Graham(6)......................................... 68,693 *
Thomas J. Madden(6)......................................... 46,034 *
C. Clifford Defee(6)........................................ 18,491 *
James F. Reilly(7).......................................... 31,405 *
Timothy M. Murray(7)........................................ 114,089 *
Dr. Neil W. Jacobs(8)....................................... 35,312 *
Harvey H. Achatz(9)......................................... 61,223 *
Cynthia D. Almond(10)....................................... 11,250 *
Martin L. Anderson(6)....................................... 13,337 *
Lindsley D. Medlin Jr.(6)................................... 50,827 *
Valarie J. Remmers(6)....................................... 36,689 *
Scott R. Talley(6).......................................... 12,914 *
Michael G. Willoughby(6).................................... 13,612 *
All directors and executive officers As a group (16
persons)(11).............................................. 861,013 4.7%
========= ====
- ---------------
* Represents less than 1%
(1) This table is based on 18,114,092 shares of Common Stock outstanding on
July 20, 2001.
(2) Based upon a letter issued to the Company applicable to a Schedule 13G
Amendment No. 1 dated May 10, 2001 filed by Gilder, Gagnon, Howe & Co. LLC
stating beneficial ownership and shared voting and dispositive power as of
May 10, 2001.
(3) Based upon a Schedule 13G dated February 13, 2001 filed by Wellington
Management Company, LLP reporting beneficial ownership and shared voting
power of 1,665,000 shares and shared dispositive power of 1,765,576 shares
as of December 31, 2000.
(4) Based upon a Schedule 13G dated January 31, 2001 filed by Franklin
Resources, Inc. reporting beneficial ownership and sole and dispositive
power on behalf of Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC as of December 31,
2000.
11
15
(5) Includes outstanding options to purchase 26,667 shares of Common Stock,
which are fully vested and exercisable.
(6) Includes outstanding options to purchase 11,667 shares of Common Stock,
which are fully vested and exercisable.
(7) Includes outstanding options to purchase 25,000 shares of Common Stock,
which are fully vested and exercisable.
(8) Includes outstanding options to purchase 35,000 shares of Common Stock,
which are fully vested and exercisable.
(9) Includes outstanding options to purchase 5,000 shares of Common Stock,
which are fully vested and exercisable.
(10) Includes outstanding options to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock,
which are fully vested and exercisable.
(11) Includes outstanding options to purchase 246,670 shares of Common Stock,
which are fully vested and exercisable.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Company's Relationship with Daisytek
At the time of the Company's initial public offering, the Company and
Daisytek entered into various agreements providing for the separation of their
respective business operations. These agreements govern various interim and
ongoing relationships between the companies, including the transaction
management services that the Company provided for Daisytek, the transitional
services that Daisytek provided to the Company and a tax indemnification and
allocation agreement which governs the allocation of tax liabilities and sets
forth provisions with respect to other tax matters. All of the agreements
between the Company and Daisytek were made in the context of a parent-subsidiary
relationship and were negotiated in the overall context of the spin-off.
Although the Company generally believes that the terms of these agreements are
consistent with fair market values, there can be no assurance that the prices
charged to or by each company under these agreements are not higher or lower
than the prices that may be charged by, or to, unaffiliated third parties for
similar services.
MASTER SEPARATION AGREEMENT
The Master Separation Agreement sets forth the agreements between the
Company and Daisytek with respect to the principal corporate transactions
required to effect the transfers of assets and assumptions of liabilities
necessary to separate the Company business unit from Daisytek and certain other
agreements governing this relationship thereafter.
Transfer of Assets and Liabilities. Following completion of the Company's
initial public offering, Daisytek transferred to the Company all of the fixed
assets in Daisytek's Memphis distribution facility as well as certain assets
associated with providing information technology services and the stock of
several subsidiaries of Daisytek representing the business operations of the
Company, and the Company transferred to Daisytek approximately $5 million in
cash and assumed approximately $0.3 million of capital lease obligations, as
well as the operating lease obligations related to these assets. The Company
also repaid to Daisytek, from the net proceeds of the offering, the aggregate
sum of approximately $27 million, representing the outstanding balance of the
Company's intercompany payable to Daisytek.
Indemnification. The Company agreed to indemnify Daisytek against any
losses, claims, damages or liabilities arising from the liabilities transferred
to the Company and the conduct of the Company business after the completion of
the offering. Daisytek agreed to retain, and indemnify the Company against, any
losses, claims, damages or liabilities arising from the conduct of the Company
business prior to the completion of the offering.
12
16
INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
General. The Company and Daisytek entered into an Initial Public Offering
and Distribution Agreement which governs their respective rights and duties with
respect to the Company's initial public offering and the spin-off, and sets
forth certain covenants to which they will be bound for various periods
following the offering and the spin-off.
Preservation of the Tax-free Status of the Spin-off. Daisytek has received
a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service to the effect that the
spin-off qualifies as a tax-free distribution under Section 355 of the Internal
Revenue Code to Daisytek and its stockholders. In connection with obtaining such
ruling, certain representations and warranties were made regarding Daisytek, the
Company and their respective businesses. The Company has also agreed to certain
covenants that are intended to preserve the tax-free status of the spin-off.
These covenants include:
Certain Acquisition Transactions. Until two years after the completion of
the spin-off, the Company has agreed not to enter into or permit any transaction
or series of transactions that would result in a person or persons acquiring or
having the right to acquire shares of its capital stock that would comprise 50%
or more of either the value of all outstanding shares of its capital stock or
the total combined voting power of its outstanding voting stock.
Continuation of Active Trade or Business. Until two years after the
completion of the spin-off, the Company has agreed to continue to conduct its
active trade or business (within the meaning of Section 355 of the Code) as it
was conducted immediately prior to the completion of the spin-off. During such
time, the Company has agreed not to:
- liquidate, dispose of or otherwise discontinue the conduct of any
substantial portion of its active trade or business; or
- dispose of any business or assets that would cause it to be operated in a
manner inconsistent in any material respect with the business purposes
for the spin-off as described in the representations made in connection
with Daisytek's request for the IRS Ruling.
Continuity of Business. Until two years after the completion of the
spin-off, the Company has agreed that it will not voluntarily dissolve or
liquidate; and, except in the ordinary course of business, neither it nor any of
its direct or indirect subsidiaries will sell, transfer, or otherwise dispose of
or agree to dispose of assets (including any shares of capital stock of its
subsidiaries) that, in the aggregate, constitute more than 60% of its assets.
Intracompany Debt. Until two years after the completion of the spin-off,
the Company will not be able to have any indebtedness to Daisytek, other than
payables arising in the ordinary course of business. These covenants will not
prohibit the Company from implementing or complying with any transaction
permitted by an IRS ruling or a tax opinion.
Other Covenants Regarding Tax Treatment of the Transactions. Daisytek
intends the transfer of assets and liabilities from Daisytek to the Company as
provided by the master separation agreement (the "Contribution") to qualify as a
reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code (a "D Reorganization").
Until two years after the completion of the spin-off, the Company has agreed not
to take, or permit any of its subsidiaries to take, any actions or enter into
any transaction or series of transactions that would be reasonably likely to
jeopardize the tax-free status of the spin-off or the qualification of the
Contribution as a D Reorganization, including any action or transaction that
would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with any representation made in
connection with Daisytek's request for the IRS Ruling. The Company has also
agreed to take any reasonable actions necessary for the Contribution and the
spin-off to qualify as a D Reorganization.
Cooperation on Tax Matters. The Company and Daisytek have agreed to
various procedures with respect to the tax-related covenants described above,
and the Company is required to notify Daisytek if it desires to take any action
prohibited by these covenants. Upon such notification, if Daisytek determines
that
13
17
such action might jeopardize the tax-free status of the spin-off or the
qualification of the Contribution as a D Reorganization, Daisytek will either
use all commercially reasonable efforts to obtain a private letter ruling from
the IRS or a tax opinion that would permit the Company to take the desired
action or provide all reasonable cooperation to the Company in connection with
the Company obtaining such an IRS ruling or tax opinion. In either case,
Daisytek has agreed to bear the reasonable costs and expenses of obtaining the
IRS ruling or tax opinion, unless it is determined that the Company's proposed
action will jeopardize the tax-free status of the spin-off or the qualification
of the Contribution as a D Reorganization, in which event the Company will be
responsible for such costs and expenses.
Indemnification for Tax Liabilities. The Company has generally agreed to
indemnify Daisytek and its affiliates against any and all tax-related losses
incurred by Daisytek in connection with any proposed tax assessment or tax
controversy with respect to the spin-off or the Contribution to the extent
caused by any breach by it of any of its representations, warranties or
covenants. If the Company causes the spin-off to not qualify as a tax-free
distribution, Daisytek would incur federal income tax (which currently would be
imposed at a 35% rate) and possibly state income taxes on the gain inherent in
the shares distributed, which would be based upon the market value of the shares
of the Company at the time of the spin-off. This indemnification does not apply
to actions that Daisytek permits the Company to take as a result of a
determination under the tax-related covenants as described above. Similarly,
Daisytek has agreed to indemnify the Company and its affiliates against any and
all tax-related losses incurred by it in connection with any proposed tax
assessment or tax controversy with respect to the spin-off or the Contribution
to the extent caused by any breach by Daisytek of any of its representations,
warranties or covenants.
Other Indemnification. The Company has generally agreed to indemnify
Daisytek and its affiliates against all liabilities arising out of any material
untrue statements and omissions in the Company's prospectus and the registration
statement of which it is a part and in any and all registration statements,
information statements and/or other documents filed with the SEC in connection
with the spin-off or otherwise. However, the Company's indemnification of
Daisytek does not apply to information relating to Daisytek. Daisytek has agreed
to indemnify the Company for this information.
Expenses. In general, the Company agreed to pay substantially all costs
and expenses relating to the offering, including the underwriting discounts and
commissions, and Daisytek agreed to pay substantially all costs and expenses
relating to the spin-off.
TAX MATTERS
Daisytek and the Company have entered into a tax indemnification and
allocation agreement to govern the allocation of tax liabilities and to set
forth agreements with respect to certain other tax matters. Under the Code, the
Company ceased to be a member of the Daisytek consolidated group upon the
completion of the spin-off. Daisytek generally will pay all taxes attributable
to the Company and its subsidiaries for tax periods or portions thereof ending
on or before the effective date of the Company's initial public offering, except
to the extent of any accruals thereof on the books and records of the Company or
its subsidiaries for such taxes under generally accepted accounting principles.
Thereafter, for tax periods or portions thereof during which the Company was a
member of the Daisytek consolidated, combined or unitary group, the Company was
apportioned its share of the group's income tax liability based on its taxable
income determined separately from Daisytek's taxable income, and the Company
paid its calculated taxes to Daisytek, which will then file a consolidated,
combined or unitary return with the appropriate tax authorities. There may be
certain U.S. state or local jurisdictions in which the Company will file
separate income tax returns, not combined or consolidated with Daisytek, for
such tax periods. In that circumstance, the Company would file a tax return with
the appropriate tax authorities, and pay all taxes directly to the tax
authority. The Company will be compensated for tax benefits generated by it
before tax deconsolidation and used by the Daisytek consolidated group. The
Company will prepare and file all tax returns, and pay all income taxes due with
respect to all tax returns required to be filed by it for all tax periods after
it ceased to be a member of the Daisytek consolidated, combined or unitary
group. Daisytek is responsible for most U.S. tax adjustments related to the
Company for all periods or portions thereof ending on or before the effective
date of the offering. In addition, the Company and Daisytek have agreed to
cooperate in any tax audits, litigation or appeals that involve, directly or
14
18
indirectly, periods prior to the time that the Company ceased to be a member of
the Daisytek consolidated group. The Company and Daisytek have agreed to
indemnify each other for tax liabilities resulting from the failure to cooperate
in such audits, litigation or appeals, and for any tax liability resulting from
the failure to maintain adequate records. Notwithstanding the tax allocation
agreement, for all periods in which Daisytek owned 80% or more of the Company's
capital stock, the Company will be included in Daisytek's consolidated group for
federal income tax purposes. If Daisytek or other members of the consolidated
group fail to make any federal income tax payments, the Company will be liable
for the shortfall since each member of a consolidated group is liable for the
group's entire tax obligation. Under the tax indemnification and allocation
agreement, Daisytek has agreed to indemnify the Company against any taxes
resulting from the failure of the spin-off to qualify for tax-free treatment,
except that the Company will be liable for, and will indemnify Daisytek against,
any taxes resulting from the failure of the spin-off to qualify for tax-free
treatment if it is the result of the Company engaging in a "Prohibited Action"
or the occurrence of a "Disqualifying Event." Neither the Company nor Daisytek
have the option to rescind the spin-off if a tax liability results. A
"Prohibited Action" is defined as:
- if the Company takes any action which is inconsistent with the tax
treatment of the spin-off as contemplated in the IRS Ruling; or
- if, prior to the spin-off, the Company issued shares of stock or took any
other action that would result in it not being controlled by Daisytek
within the meaning of Section 368(c) of the Code.
A "Disqualifying Event" includes any event involving the direct or indirect
acquisition of the shares of the Company's capital stock after the spin-off
which has the effect of disqualifying the spin-off from tax-free treatment,
whether or not the event is the result of our direct action or within the
Company's control.
TRANSACTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT
The Company and Daisytek entered into a transaction management services
agreement which sets forth the transaction management services that the Company
provides for Daisytek. Under this agreement, the Company provided a wide range
of transaction management services, including information management, order
fulfillment and distribution, product warehousing, inbound call center services,
product return administration and other services. As described in "Sale of
Assets to Daisytek," effective May 2001, Daisytek and the Company terminated the
transaction management services agreement.
As part of the restructuring of the Company's arrangements with IBM, the
Company also entered into transaction management agreements with Daisytek to
provide transaction management services, on a worldwide basis, in connection
with Daisytek's distribution of various IBM products. Under these agreements,
the Company receives service fees based upon a variable percent of Daisytek's
gross profit arising from its IBM product sales. These agreements are
coterminous with the Company's IBM agreements which, have scheduled expiration
dates through September 2001, although IBM may terminate these agreements at any
time. Daisytek has indicated that it does not intend to continue distributing
IBM product under these agreements after their scheduled expiration date. The
Company is currently discussing with IBM the continuation of these arrangements
and has received a letter of intent from IBM to extend such agreements for two
years subject to the Company or an affiliate obtaining satisfactory financing.
There can be no assurance that these discussions will be successful or that the
Company's arrangements with IBM will continue or, if they continue, any of the
terms thereof.
TRANSITION SERVICES AGREEMENT
Upon completion of the Company's initial public offering, Daisytek and the
Company entered into a transition services agreement. Under this agreement,
Daisytek provided the Company with various services relating to employee payroll
and benefits, use of facilities, and other administrative services. Daisytek
provided the Company with these services until the completion of the spin-off
(the "Transition Period"), except that, with respect to any particular service,
the Company may, upon notice to Daisytek, either terminate the Transition Period
as of an earlier date or extend the Transition Period for up to one year from
the completion
15
19
of the Offering. The agreement required the Company to use all commercially
reasonable efforts to obtain these transition services from a source other than
Daisytek prior to the conclusion of the Transition Period. If, however, the
Company cannot obtain any transition service from a source other than Daisytek
and the transition service was necessary for the Company to continue to operate
its business, then, the Company may require Daisytek to continue to provide the
transition service for an additional period not to exceed six months. Generally,
the Company paid Daisytek for these transition services an amount equal to the
cost historically allocated by Daisytek to the Company's business, adjusted to
reflect any changes in the nature, cost or level of the services so provided. If
the Company required Daisytek to provide it with any transition service after
the expiration of the Transition Period, the Company paid Daisytek the fair
market value of these services. Daisytek is no longer providing services to the
Company under this transition services agreement.
SUBSTITUTE STOCK OPTIONS
In connection with the completion of the spin-off, on the effective date of
the spin-off, all outstanding Daisytek stock options were replaced with
substitute stock options as described below:
Options held by Daisytek employees who were transferred to the Company
were replaced (at the option holder's election) with either options to
acquire shares of the Company's common stock or options to acquire shares
of both Daisytek common stock and the Company's common stock (which may be
exercised separately) (the "Unstapled Options"). Options held by Daisytek
employees who remained with Daisytek were replaced (at the option holder's
election) with either options to acquire shares of Daisytek common stock or
Unstapled Options. In general, the adjustments to the outstanding Daisytek
options were established pursuant to a formula designed to ensure that: (1)
the aggregate "intrinsic value" (i.e. the difference between the exercise
price of the option and the market price of the common stock underlying the
option) of the substitute options did not exceed the aggregate intrinsic
value of the outstanding Daisytek stock option which was replaced by such
substitute option immediately prior to the spin-off, and (2) the ratio of
the exercise price of each option to the market value of the underlying
stock immediately before and after the spin-off was preserved.
Substantially all of the other terms and conditions of each substitute
stock option, including the time or times when, and the manner in which,
each option will be exercisable, the duration of the exercise period, the
permitted method of exercise, settlement and payment, the rules that will
apply in the event of the termination of employment of the employee, the
events, if any, that may give rise to an employee's right to accelerate the
vesting or the time or exercise thereof and the vesting provisions, are the
same as those of the replaced Daisytek stock option, except that option
holders who are employed by one company will be permitted to exercise, and
will be subject to all of the terms and provisions of, options to acquire
shares in the other company as if such holder was an employee of such other
company. No adjustment or replacement was made to outstanding Company stock
options as a result of the spin-off.
SALE OF ASSETS TO DAISYTEK
In May 2001, the Company sold to Daisytek certain of the Company's assets
used to provide transaction management services to Daisytek and its subsidiaries
for a purchase price of $11 million ($10 million of which was paid at closing
and $1 million is payable over a six month period subject to certain potential
offsets). As part of this transaction, Daisytek and the Company terminated the
transaction management services agreement described above. As part of this
transaction, the Company and Daisytek also entered into a six-month (subject to
optional renewals) transition services agreement under which the Company agreed
to provide Daisytek with certain information technology transition services for
a monthly service fee, subject to satisfaction of certain performance criteria.
16
20
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following line graph displays the cumulative total return to
stockholders of the Company's Common Stock from December 2, 1999 (the
commencement of trading of the Company's Common Stock) to March 31, 2001,
compared to the cumulative total return for the Total Return Index for The
NASDAQ Stock Market (US) and the Russell 2000 Index. The graph assumes a $100
investment in the Company's Common Stock, on December 2, 1999 at the initial
offering price of $17 per share, and in each of the above mentioned indices. The
Russell 2000 Index is an index of companies with market capitalizations similar
to the Company. The Company's management believes that an index of companies
with similar market capitalizations provides a reasonable basis for comparing
total shareholder returns.
[PERFORMANCE GRAPH]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/02/99 03/31/00 03/31/01
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PFSweb, Inc. 100.00 94.12 5.70
NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) 100.00 136.24 54.54
Russell 2000 100.00 119.30 101.02
ITEM 2
PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE COMPANY'S
2000 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
The Company's 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Purchase Plan") was
adopted by the Company's Board of Directors in June 2000 and was approved by the
Company's stockholders at the 2000 Annual Meeting. The purpose of the Purchase
Plan is to provide eligible employees of the Company and its participating
subsidiaries with the continuing opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest
in the Company through participation in a payroll deduction based employee stock
purchase plan designed to operate in compliance with Section 423 of the Internal
Revenue Code. The Company's Board of Directors has approved an amendment to the
Purchase Plan, subject to stockholder approval, to increase the number of shares
of Common Stock reserved for issuance thereunder to 2,000,000 shares.
The following is a summary description of the Purchase Plan and is
qualified in its entirety by the provisions of the Purchase Plan.
17
21
PLAN DESCRIPTION
The purpose of the Purchase Plan is to provide eligible employees of the
Company and its participating subsidiaries with the continuing opportunity to
acquire a proprietary interest in the Company through participation in a payroll
deduction based employee stock purchase plan designed to operate in compliance
with Section 423 of the Code.
The Company initially reserved 250,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance
under the Purchase Plan. As of July 20, 2001, an aggregate of 244,092 shares
have been issued under the Purchase Plan. The Company's Board of Directors has
approved an amendment to the Purchase Plan, subject to stockholder approval, to
increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance thereunder
to 2,000,000 shares. These shares may be authorized but unissued shares,
treasury shares or shares purchased in the open market.
The Plan is administered by a committee of the Board of Directors (the
"Purchase Plan Committee"). The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
presently serves as the Purchase Plan Committee. Under the terms of the Purchase
Plan, the Board may, and currently intends, to limit the members of the Purchase
Plan Committee to Directors who are both "non-employee directors," as defined in
Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and "outside
directors" as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code. The Purchase Plan Committee
has complete authority to adopt such rules, regulations and procedures as it may
deem necessary or appropriate for the proper administration of the Purchase
Plan. All costs and expenses incurred in administering the Purchase Plan will be
paid by the Company.
The Purchase Plan Committee is authorized to establish, from time to time,
one or more offering periods for each calendar year, and each participant in the
Purchase Plan may designate periodic payroll deductions from his or her salary
to be applied to the purchase of shares of Common Stock on each purchase date
(which will be the last business day of each offering period). The purchase
price per share at which Common Stock will be purchased on the participant's
behalf on each purchase date will be determined by the Purchase Plan Committee
for each offering period, but will not be less than 85% of the lower of the fair
market value of the Common Stock on the first business day of the applicable
offering period or the fair market value of the Common Stock on the applicable
purchase date.
The fair market value per share of Common Stock on any relevant date will
be the last sales price per share on such date as reported by NASDAQ or a
successor quotation system.
Any individual who is employed on a basis under which he or she is
regularly expected to work for at least 20 hours per week for more than five
months per calendar year as an employee of the Company or any designated
subsidiary of the Company and has completed 15 days of employment as of the
first day of any offering period will be eligible to participate in the Purchase
Plan. As of March 31, 2001, approximately 500 employees, including the Company's
executive officers, were eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan.
The Purchase Plan imposes certain limitations upon a participant's rights
to acquire Common Stock under the Purchase Plan, including the following: (i) no
purchase right may be granted to any individual who owns stock (including stock
purchasable under any outstanding purchase rights and options, whether vested or
unvested) possessing 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of
all classes of stock of the Company and (ii) no purchase right granted to a
participant may permit such individual to purchase Common Stock at a rate
greater than $25,000 worth of such Common Stock (valued at the time such
purchase right is granted) for each calendar year the purchase right remains
outstanding.
A participant's purchase right will immediately terminate upon the
participant's termination of employment or loss of eligible employee status or
upon his or her withdrawal from participation. No purchase right is assignable
or transferable by an eligible employee.
Participants in the Purchase Plan will have no rights as a stockholder with
respect to the shares of Common Stock covered by his or her purchase right until
such time as the shares are actually purchased on the applicable purchase date.
No adjustment will be made for dividends, distributions or other rights with
respect to any record date during an offering period which is prior to a
purchase date.
18
22
In the event of (i) the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, (ii) the
sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, (iii) the merger
or consolidation of the Company with or into another corporation or other entity
(if the Company is not the surviving corporation of such merger on
consolidation) or (iv) the acquisition by another person or entity of 80% or
more of the Company's then outstanding voting stock, then, upon the effective
date of any such event, any outstanding offering period under the Purchase Plan
will terminate and such date will be treated as the purchase date and, in lieu
of the issuance of Common Stock to participating eligible employees, there shall
be paid, for each such share of Common Stock, as nearly as reasonably may be
determined, the cash, securities and/or property which a holder of one share of
Common Stock was entitled to receive upon and as of the effective date of such
event.
The Board of Directors of the Company may terminate the Plan or amend the
Plan from time to time; provided, however, that the Board shall not, without the
approval of the stockholders of the Company (i) increase the number of shares
available for purchase under the Purchase Plan, (ii) change the class of persons
eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan, or (iii) reduce the purchase price
of Common Stock below that set forth in the Purchase Plan.
Participation in the Purchase Plan is voluntary and the Company cannot now
determine the amount of shares of Common Stock that may be acquired by the
participants therein (which include the Company's executive officers) or the
value of any such participation.
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following is a summary of the federal income tax consequences to
employees participating in the Purchase Plan and to the Company, based upon
current provisions of the Code, the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder
and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, and does not address
any consequences under any other applicable tax laws. The provisions of the
Code, regulations thereunder and related interpretations are complicated and
their impact in any one case may depend upon the particular circumstances
relating thereto.
Rights to purchase stock under the Purchase Plan are referred to in the
Code as "options." A participating employee will not recognize income at the
time options are granted to such employee at the commencement of an offering
period or when the employee exercises such options and purchases shares of
Common Stock at the end of an offering period. An employee will be taxed on
amounts withheld from salary under the Purchase Plan as if actually received,
and the Company will be entitled to deduct a corresponding amount.
If an employee does not dispose of the shares of Common Stock purchased
pursuant to the Purchase Plan until more than two years after the date of grant
of the options and one year after the transfer of the shares to the employee, or
if the employee dies without having disposed of such shares, such employee must
include in gross income as compensation (as ordinary income and not as capital
gain) for the taxable year of disposition or death an amount equal to the lesser
of (i) the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of
disposition or death over the amount paid for the shares, or (ii) the excess of
the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant of the options over the
exercise price. If the amount realized upon such a disposition by way of sale or
exchange of the shares exceeds the purchase price plus the amount, if any,
included in income as compensation, such excess will be capital gain. This
capital gain will be long or short term capital gain depending upon the length
of time the employee has held the stock prior to the date of sale.
The Company will not be entitled to any deduction in respect of options
granted under the Purchase Plan or shares of Common Stock issued and delivered
pursuant to the exercise of such options, if the holding period requirements are
met or the employee dies prior to disposing of the shares acquired upon
exercise.
If an employee disposes of the shares of Common Stock within two years from
the date of grant of the option or within one year from the date of exercise (an
"Early Disposition"), the employee will recognize ordinary income at the time of
disposition which will equal the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the
shares on the date of exercise over the amount paid for such shares. Under
current IRS interpretations, with respect to options exercised prior to January
1, 2003, the Company will not be required to withhold taxes
19
23
related to such ordinary income from other payments due the employee. The
Company will generally be entitled to a deduction in an amount equal to such
income. The excess, if any, of the amount realized on disposition of such shares
over the fair market value of such shares on the date of exercise will be
long-term or short-term capital gain, depending upon the holding period for the
shares. If an employee disposes of such shares for less than his or her basis in
the shares, the difference between the amount realized and such basis will be a
long-term or short-term capital loss, depending upon the holding period for the
shares.
Approval of the Purchase Plan amendment will require the affirmative vote
of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by
proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will be considered
shares entitled to vote in the tabulation of votes cast on proposals presented
to the stockholders and will have the same effect as negative votes. Broker
non-votes are counted towards a quorum, but are not counted for the purpose of
determining whether this matter has been approved. If the Purchase Plan
amendment is not approved, the Purchase Plan will continue in accordance with
its terms without the Purchase Plan amendment. Complete copies of the Purchase
Plan, including the Purchase Plan amendment can be obtained from the Secretary
of the Company.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR approval of the amendment to
the Company's 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
ITEM 3
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Company has appointed KPMG LLP as the Company's independent auditors
for the nine month transition period ending December 31, 2001. KPMG LLP audited
the Company's financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001.
Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent
auditors will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common
Stock represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual
Meeting. In the event shareholders do not ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as
the Company's independent auditors, such appointment may be reconsidered by the
Audit Committee and the Board of Directors. Representatives of KPMG LLP will be
present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and to make
such statements as they may desire.
The Board of Directors of the Company recommends a vote FOR ratification of
KPMG LLP as the Company's independent auditors for the nine month transition
period ending December 31, 2001.
Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed by KPMG LLP for professional
services rendered for the audit of the Company's annual financial statements for
the 2001 fiscal year was $125,000.
Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees. There were
no fees billed by KPMG LLP for the professional services described in Paragraph
(c)(4)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X for fiscal year 2001.
All Other Fees. There were no other fees billed by KPMG LLP for services
rendered for fiscal year 2001.
The Audit Committee considered whether the provision of the services
covered under the preceding two paragraphs is compatible with maintaining the
principal accountant's independence.
Prior to the appointment of KPMG, LLP, the Company's independent auditors
were Arthur Andersen LLP. On February 26, 2001, the Company and Arthur Andersen
LLP terminated their client-auditor relationship. The reports of Arthur Andersen
LLP on the consolidated financial statements for the past two years contained no
adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as
to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. The Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors of the Company approved the decision to change independent
accountants. In connection with its audits for the two most recent fiscal years
and through February 26, 2001, there were no disagreements with Arthur Andersen
LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, consolidated financial
statement
20
24
disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved
to the satisfaction of Arthur Andersen LLP, would have caused them to make
reference thereto in their report on the consolidated financial statements for
such years. During the two most recent fiscal years and through February 26,
2001, there were no reportable events (as defined in Regulation S-K Item
304(a)(1)(v)). The Company requested that Arthur Andersen LLP furnish it with a
letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or
not it agrees with the above statements. A copy of such letter, dated March 2,
2001, was received. The Company appointed KPMG LLP as its new independent
accountants as of February 26, 2001.
GENERAL INFORMATION
VOTING PROCEDURES
All matters specified in this Proxy Statement that are to be voted on at
the Annual Meeting will be by written ballot. One or more inspectors of election
will be appointed, among other things, to determine the number of shares
outstanding and the voting power of each, the shares represented at the Annual
Meeting, the existence of a quorum and the authenticity, validity and effect of
proxies, to receive votes or ballots, to hear and determine all challenges and
questions in any way arising in connection with the right to vote, to count and
tabulate all votes and to determine the result.
SOLICITATION COSTS
The Company will pay the cost of preparing and mailing this Proxy Statement
and other costs of the proxy solicitation made by the Board of Directors.
Certain of the Company's officers and employees may solicit the submission of
proxies authorizing the voting of shares in accordance with the Board of
Directors' recommendations, but no additional remuneration will be paid by the
Company for the solicitation of those proxies. Such solicitations may be made by
personal interview or telephone. Arrangements have also been made with brokerage
firms and others for the forwarding of proxy solicitation materials to the
beneficial owners of Common Stock, and the Company will reimburse such persons
for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection therewith.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2002 ANNUAL MEETING
A stockholder desiring to submit an otherwise eligible proposal for
inclusion in the Company's proxy statement for the 2002 annual meeting of
stockholders of the Company must deliver the proposal so that it is received by
the Company no later than December 31, 2001. The Company requests that all such
proposals be addressed to the Company's Secretary at the Company's principal
executive offices, 500 North Central Expressway, Plano, Texas 75074, and mailed
by certified mail, return-receipt requested.
COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN REPORTING OBLIGATIONS
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company's executive
officers, directors and controlling stockholders to file initial reports of
ownership and reports of changes of ownership of the Company's Common Stock with
the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Company. To the Company's
knowledge, all reports required to be so filed were filed in accordance with the
provisions of said Section 16(a).
FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION
The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2001
is being sent to stockholders of record as of the Record Date together with this
Proxy Statement.
21
25
OTHER MATTERS
The Board of Directors knows of no matters other than those described in
this Proxy Statement which are likely to come before the Annual Meeting. If any
other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment
thereof, the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy intend to vote the
proxies in accordance with their best judgment.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ HARVEY H. ACHATZ
Harvey H. Achatz
Secretary
Plano, Texas
July 26, 2001
22
26
APPENDIX I
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
I. PURPOSE
The primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of
Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by reviewing: the
financial reports and other financial information provided by the Corporation to
any governmental body or the public; the Corporation's systems of internal
controls regarding finance, accounting, legal compliance and ethics that
management and the Board have established; and the Corporation's auditing,
accounting and financial reporting processes generally. Consistent with this
function, the Audit Committee should encourage continuous improvement of, and
should foster adherence to, the Corporation's policies, procedures and practices
at all levels. The Audit Committee's primary duties and responsibilities are to:
(1) Serve as an independent and objective party to monitor the
Corporation's financial reporting process and internal control system.
(2) Review and appraise the audit efforts of the Corporation's
independent accountants and internal auditing department.
(3) Provide an open avenue of communication among the independent
accountants, financial and senior management, the internal auditing
department, and the Board of Directors.
(4) The Audit Committee will primarily fulfill these responsibilities
by carrying out the activities enumerated in Section IV below of this
Charter.
II. COMPOSITION
Effective no later than June 2001, the Audit Committee shall be comprised
of three or more directors as determined by the Board, each of whom shall be an
independent director, and free from any relationship that, in the opinion of the
Board, would interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment as a
member of the Committee. A director will not be considered "independent," for
purposes of serving as a member of the Committee, if, among other things, he or
she has:
- Been employed by the Corporation or its affiliates in the current or past
three years;
- Accepted any compensation from the Corporation or its affiliates in
excess of $60,000 during the previous fiscal year (except for board
service, retirement plan benefits, or non-discretionary compensation);
- An immediate family member who is, or has been in the past three years,
employed by the Corporation or its affiliates as an executive officer;
- Been a partner, controlling shareholder or an executive officer of any
for-profit business to which the Corporation made, or from which it
received, payments (other than those which arise solely from investments
in the Corporation's securities) that exceed five percent of the
organization's consolidated gross revenues for the year, or $200,000,
whichever is more, in any of the past three years; or
- Been employed as an executive of another entity where any of the
Corporation's executives serve on that entity's compensation committee.
All members of the Committee shall have a working familiarity with basic
finance and accounting practices, and at least one member of the Committee shall
have accounting or related financial management expertise. Committee members may
enhance their familiarity with finance and accounting by participating in
educational programs conducted by the Corporation or any outside consultant.
The members of the Committee shall be elected by the Board at the annual
organizational meeting of the Board or until their successors shall be duly
elected and qualified. Unless a Chair is elected by the full Board,
23
27
the members of the Committee may designate a Chair by majority vote of the full
Committee membership. The Audit Committee shall submit the minutes of all
meetings of the Audit Committee to, or discuss the matters discussed at each
committee meeting with, the Board of Directors.
III. MEETINGS
The Committee shall meet at least two times annually, or more or less
frequently as circumstances dictate. As part of its job to foster open
communication, the Committee should meet at least annually with management, the
director of the internal auditing department and the independent accountants in
separate executive sessions to discuss any matters that the Committee or each of
these groups believe should be discussed privately. In addition, the Committee
or at least its Chair should meet with the independent accountants and
management annually to review the scope of the current year audit, procedures to
be utilized and conclusions therefrom, and to review the Corporation's
financials consistent with IV.A below.
The independent accountants shall be accountable to the Audit Committee and
ultimately to the Board of Directors.
IV. RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES
To fulfill its responsibilities and duties the Audit Committee shall:
Documents/Reports Review
(1) Review and update this Charter periodically, as conditions dictate.
(2) Review the Corporation's annual financial statements and any reports or
other financial information submitted to any governmental body, or the public,
including any certification, report, opinion, or review rendered by the
independent accountants.
(3) Review the regular internal reports to management prepared by the
internal auditing department and management's response.
(4) Review with financial management and the independent accountants each
10-Q and 10-K prior to its filing or prior to the release of earnings. The Chair
of the Committee may represent the entire Committee for purposes of this review.
Independent Accountants
(5) Recommend to the Board of Directors the selection of the independent
accountants, considering independence and effectiveness and approve the fees and
other compensation to be paid to the independent accountants. On an annual
basis, the Committee should review and discuss with the accountants all
significant relationships the accountants have with the Corporation to determine
the accountants' independence, including a review of management consulting and
other service fees, not related to the provision of audit services.
(6) Review the performance of the independent accountants and approve any
proposed discharge of the independent accountants when circumstances warrant,
and appointment of any new independent accountants.
(7) Periodically consult with the independent accountants, out of the
presence of management, about internal controls and the truthfulness and
accuracy of the Corporation's financial statements.
Financial Reporting Processes
(8) In consultation with the independent accountants and the internal
auditors, review the integrity of the Corporation's financial reporting
processes, both internal and external.
(9) Consider the independent accountants' judgments about the quality and
appropriateness of the Corporation's accounting principles as applied in its
financial reporting.
24
28
(10) Consider and approve, if appropriate, major changes to the
Corporation's auditing and accounting principles and practices as suggested by
the independent accountants, management, or the internal auditing department.
Process Improvement
(11) Establish regular and separate systems of reporting to the Audit
Committee by each of management, the independent accountants and the internal
auditors regarding any significant judgments made in management's preparation of
the financial statements and the view of each as to appropriateness of such
judgments.
(12) Following completion of the annual audit, review separately with each
of management, the independent accountants and the internal auditing department
any significant difficulties encountered during the course of the audit,
including any restrictions on the scope of work or access to required
information.
(13) Review any significant disagreement among management and the
independent accountants or the internal auditing department in connection with
the preparation of the financials statements.
(14) Review with the independent accountants, the internal auditing
department and management the extent to which changes or improvements in
financial or accounting practices, as approved by the Audit Committee, have been
implemented. (This review should be conducted at an appropriate time subsequent
to implementation of changes or improvements, as decided by the Committee).
Ethical and Legal Compliance
(15) Establish, review and update periodically a Code of Ethical Conduct
and ensure that management has established a system to enforce this Code.
(16) Review management's monitoring of the Corporation's compliance with
the Corporation's Ethical Code, and ensure that management has the proper review
system in place to ensure that the Corporation's financial statements, reports
and other financial information disseminated to governmental organizations and
the public satisfy legal requirements.
(17) Review activities, organizational structure, and qualifications of the
internal audit department.
(18) Review, with the Corporation's counsel, any legal matter that could
have a significant impact on the Corporation's financial statements.
(19) Perform any other activities consistent with this Charter, the
Corporation's Bylaws and governing law, as the Committee or the Board deems
necessary or appropriate.
V. GENERAL
To the extent not otherwise inconsistent herewith, the applicable
provisions of the Corporation's Bylaws shall be incorporated herein, and without
limitation of the specific duties and responsibilities set forth above, the
Committee shall:
(1) Consider and make recommendations to the Board with respect to the
employment of a firm of independent public accountants;
(2) Confer with the Corporation's independent public accountants to
determine the scope of the audit that such accountants will perform;
(3) Receive reports from the independent public accountants and
transmit such reports to the Board, and after the close of the fiscal year,
transmit to the Board the financial statements certified by such
accountants;
25
29
(4) Inquire into, examine and make comments on the accounting
procedures of the Corporation and the reports of the independent public
accountants, and
(5) Consider and make recommendations to the Board upon matters
presented to it by the officers of the Corporation pertaining to the audit
practices and procedures adhered to by the Corporation.
26
30
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PFSweb, Inc.
The undersigned hereby appoints Mark C. Layton and Harvey H. Achatz as
proxies, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, and
hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as designated on the other side,
all the shares of stock of PFSweb, Inc. standing in the name of the undersigned
with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present at the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held September 14, 2001 or any
adjournment thereof.
(CONTINUED, AND TO BE MARKED, DATED AND SIGNED, ON THE OTHER SIDE)
31
Please mark
your votes as [X]
indicated in
this example
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
A VOTE FOR ITEMS 1, 2 AND 3. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
ITEM 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTOR [ ] [ ] [ ] ITEM 2 - TO AMEND THE COMPANY'S 2000 EMPLOYEE [ ] [ ] [ ]
STOCK PURCHASE PLAN.
Nominee: ITEM 3 - APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS [ ] [ ] [ ]
Christopher Yates
Signature Signature Date
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ ----------------------
NOTE: PLEASE SIGN AS NAME APPEARS HEREON. JOINT OWNERS SHOULD EACH SIGN. WHEN
SIGNING AS ATTORNEY, EXECUTOR, ADMINISTRATOR, TRUSTEE OR GUARDIAN, PLEASE GIVE
FULL TITLE AS SUCH.