Exhibit 99.429


Here are my notes for tonight.

One point from today's "Energy Central" news, do we need to include the new
California APX with its 7-day ahead forward market in our work?

The project will be in three phases. We will describe the project in the
proposal but it will be noted as a means for SCE to protect itself from any
aggressive business activities of competitors and to allow SCE to take advantage
of any business opportunities that the new market provides.

I will write a (estimated six page) paper that will go to a SCE lawyer (and then
presumably to Heller) explaining what the software can really do. I will not
imply that Perot will help use with the gaming issues, only that Perot will
design the ISO simulation to parrot the existing system and that Perot can
clarify our understanding of the existing ISO/PX protocols and system. I will
have this done AM tomorrow.

From Perot's conflict of interest perspective, I agree that the ISO must be made
aware of any "holes" that Paul discovers. (Will Paul be off the ISO project by
December such that any "discoveries" after that time are not Perot's problem?)
If there is a paper trail of the ISO being notified of every "discovery", it is
unclear to me, that our "knowing" about the problems as well constitutes a
conflict of interest situation.

 The first phase is the "functional model phase." We develop the basic model and
basic options. It contains all the basic data including placeholders for the
information we think we would get from the ISO and PX. The system can be tested
by SCE staff at this time for any missing features and reasonableness of
results. (The model would generate its own test cases based on simulated
computer players.) This phase is done by September #.

The second phase is the "operational model phase." In this phase we determine
the available and actual data from the ISO/PX and add the analysis capabilities
to take the advantage of the data stream in the model. We again "make-up" test
data streams and train the SCE staff how to use the system plus make sure the
system behaves as planned. This phase ends December 31.

The third phase is the "real-time implementation phase." We monitor the system
during the early days of operations. We have "fall-back" positions when the
model produces anomalous results. We fine tune our algorithms and add any
required features. We benchmark the model compared to optimal or "other utility"
performance. (Do we want to test this in Phase 2 or 1 to show what savings we
might produce under a given optimality assumption of what the other players will
do?)

As an intrinsic part of the system, the CIGMOD engine will allow SCE to test the
impacts of others entering the California market or the impacts of mergers,
acquisitions, and takeovers among competitors or by SCE. This could be phase
four consulting because the consolidation (or dilution) changes how you need to
game the system.

I have PEROT, Paul, Jeff and George broken out. Jeff is often Jeff's shop and
Perot is the Perot shop. In many instances, the designated time is a very rough
guess and the time per party arbitrary. The party doing the task and the effort
can be change as desired.

Just get things going I have assumed my rates for Jeff and I ($250 per hour) and
$450/hour for all Perot. Phase 1 would then be $560K, and Phase 2 as $448K,
Phase 3 depends on how much support we need to give. The total is too high for
Heller unless Hemant does some nifty marketing, but it is near the million mark
and can be "refined" down easily. Also we don't have enough hours among us so we
have to drop the person weeks to something more realistic.

Exclusivity: We need to say something. The less the better, but we do want to do
as needed to keep our future marketing options intact. Two options so far if we
are forced to give (some) exclusivity: we get % of market profits (loses too?)
or project price is 3X of original price.

Tasks of Phase I

Review PX and ISO documents for protocols and business opportunities.
2 weeks George, 1 week Paul (might be two weeks for Paul. I am just assuming he
knows much if it already.)

Convert to reduced-form ISO model Paul (4 weeks?)
Jeff's or Alan's time for database and system integration (2 weeks)

Enhance PX model to contain California-specific protocols.
Jeff (two weeks), Perot (1 week)

Incorporate strategies into systems.
George (3 weeks), Jeff (3 weeks)

Add short-term forecasting structure for all players in and out of California
using Jeff's "live-weather" Farsight model.
Jeff (2 weeks)

Enhance interface for SCE gaming/system-control/SCE data-entry/SCE biding
strategy output.
Jeff (3 weeks), Perot (1 week)

Calibrate CIGMOD to competitor and SCE data.
Jeff (2 weeks)

Add plant specific data to model
Jeff (2 weeks)

Test model with SCE staff and update algorithms/interface.
Perot (2 weeks), Jeff (2 weeks)

Add SCE proprietary data
Perot (3 weeks), Jeff (1 week)

Consultant test of basic strategies to determine realistic use of strategies.
Perot (4 weeks), Jeff/George (4 weeks)

CIGMOD Software $50K (Heller already told this as part of initial McMenamin
proposal for the "basic" CIGMOD gaming effort.)

Phase II

Determine PX/ISO data stream. Use of data and transfer of data to system.
Perot (2 weeks)

Determine use of data stream and implement AI/statistical code
Perot (4 weeks), George (4 weeks)

Develop real-time data retrieval system

Perot (2 weeks), Jeff (1 week)

Develop portfolio rules for real-time and over-all strategies
Perot (1 weeks), George (1 week), Jeff (2 weeks)

Make test data stream and test with SCE staff (training)
Perot (3 weeks), Jeff (3 weeks)

Consultant test of real-time strategies to determine realistic use of
strategies.
Perot (4 weeks), Jeff/George (4 weeks)

Any language conversions for speed and better integration???

Phase III

Develop default fail-safe algorithm for bidding, add any AI that would warn of
possible "bad calls."
Perot (4 weeks), George (4 weeks), Jeff (2 weeks)

Monitor early use of system.

Determine and fix any areas needing tuning or enhancement.

Support SCE staff on usage.

Benchmark savings