HUNT CLUB
5421 CALDER WAY
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
MARKET VALUE -
FEE SIMPLE ESTATE
AS OF MAY 8, 2003
PREPARED FOR:
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY
(AIMCO)
C/O LINER YANKELEVITZ SUNSHINE & REGENSTREIF LLP
&
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN
ON BEHALF OF NUANES, ET. AL.
[AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES(R) LOGO]
[AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES(R) LOGO]
[AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES(R) LETTERHEAD]
JULY 17,2002
Apartment Investment and Management
Company ("AIMCO") c/o
Mr. Steven A. Velkei,Esq.
Liner Yankelevitz Sunshine & Regenstreif LLP
1100 Glendon Avenue, 14th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90024-3503
Nuanes, et al.( "Plaintiffs") c/o
Ms. Joy Kruse
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein
Embarcadero Center West
275 Battery Street, 30th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
RE: HUNT CLUB
5421 CALDER WAY
INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA
In accordance with your authorization, we have completed the appraisal of the
above-referenced property. This complete appraisal is intended to report our
analysis and conclusions in a summary format.
The subject property consists of an apartment project having 200 units with a
total of 202,848 square feet of rentable area. The improvements were built in
1973. The improvements are situated on 17.994 acres. Overall, the improvements
are in average condition. As of the date of this appraisal, the subject property
is 93% occupied.
It is our understanding the appraisal will be used by the clients to assist the
San Mateo Superior Court in the settlement of litigation between the above
mentioned clients. The appraisal is intended to conform to the Uniform Standards
of Professional Appraisal Practice ("USPAP") as promulgated by the Appraisal
Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation and the Code of Professional Ethics
and Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute. The appraisal
is presented in a summary report, and the Departure Provision of USPAP has not
been invoked in this appraisal. It is entirely inappropriate to use this value
conclusion or the report for any purpose other than the one stated.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL PAGE 2
HUNT CLUB,INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
The opinions expressed in this appraisal cover letter can only be completely
understood by reading the narrative report, addenda, and other data, which is
attached. The appraisal is subject to the attached general assumptions and
limiting conditions and general service conditions.
As a result of our investigation, it is our opinion that the fee simple market
value of the subject, effective May 8, 2003 is:
($8,400,000)
Respectfully submitted,
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
-s- Kenneth W. Kapecki
July 17, 2003 Ken Kapecki, MAI
#053272 Managing Principal, Real Estate Group
State of Indiana, Certified General Appraiser,
#CG49600008
Report By:
John Nolan
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 3
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover
Letter of Transmittal
Table of Contents
APPRAISAL DATA
Executive Summary ......................................................... 4
Introduction .............................................................. 9
Area Analysis ............................................................. 11
Market Analysis ........................................................... 14
Site Analysis ............................................................. 16
Improvement Analysis ...................................................... 16
Highest and Best Use ...................................................... 17
VALUATION
Valuation Procedure ....................................................... 18
Sales Comparison Approach ................................................. 20
Income Capitalization Approach ............................................ 26
Reconciliation and Conclusion ............................................. 37
ADDENDA
Exhibit A - Photographs of Subject Property
Exhibit B - Summary of Rent Comparables and Photograph of Comparables
Exhibit C - Assumptions and Limiting Conditions
Exhibit D - Certificate of Appraiser
Exhibit E - Qualifications
General Service Conditions
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGE 4
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PART ONE - PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY NAME: Hunt Club
LOCATION: 5421 Calder Way
Indianapolis, Indiana
INTENDED USE OF ASSIGNMENT: Court Settlement
PURPOSE OF APPRAISAL: "As Is" Market Value of the Fee Simple Estate
INTEREST APPRAISED: Fee simple estate
DATE OF VALUE: May 8, 2003
DATE OF REPORT: July 17, 2003
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION - SITE & IMPROVEMENTS:
SITE:
Size: 17.994 acres, or 783,819 square feet
Assessor Parcel No.: 005718
Floodplain: Community Panel No. 18097C0160 E (January 5,
2001)
Flood Zone X, an area outside the floodplain.
Zoning: D-6 (Medium Density Multifamily District)
BUILDING:
No. of Units: 200 Units
Total NRA: 202,848 Square Feet
Average Unit Size: 1,014 Square Feet
Apartment Density: 11.1 units per acre
Year Built: 1973
UNIT MIX AND MARKET RENT:
GROSS RENTAL INCOME PROJECTION
Market Rent
Square ---------------- Monthly Annual
Unit Type Feet Per Unit Per SF Income Income
- ---------------------------------------------------------
1Br/1Ba 800 $ 575 $ 0.72 $ 32,200 $ 386,400
2Br/2Ba 1,052 $ 650 $ 0.62 $ 46,800 $ 561,600
2Br/2Ba 1,072 $ 675 $ 0.63 $ 21,600 $ 259,200
2Br/2Ba 1,200 $ 720 $ 0.60 $ 28,800 $ 345,600
Total $129,400 $1,552,800
OCCUPANCY: 93%
ECONOMIC LIFE: 45 Years
EFFECTIVE AGE: 25 Years
REMAINING ECONOMIC LIFE: 20 Years
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGE 5
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS AND LOCATION MAP:
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS
[PICTURE]
EXTERIOR - APARTMENT BUILDING
[PICTURE]
EXTERIOR - FRONTAGE
AREA MAP
[MAP]
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGE 6
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
NEIGHBORHOOD MAP
[MAP]
HIGHEST AND BEST USE:
As Vacant: Hold for future multi-family development
As Improved: Continuation as its current use
METHOD OF VALUATION: In this instance, the Sales Comparison and
Income Approaches to value were utilized.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGE 7
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
PART TWO - ECONOMIC INDICATORS
INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH
Amount $/Unit
-------------------------------------
DIRECT CAPITALIZATION
Potential Rental Income $1,552,800 $7,764
Effective Gross Income $1,530,726 $7,654
Operating Expenses $848,439 $4,242 55.4% of EGI
Net Operating Income: $642,287 $3,211
Capitalization Rate 7.75%
DIRECT CAPITALIZATION VALUE $8,300,000 * $41,500 / UNIT
DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW ANALYSIS:
Holding Period 10 years
2002 Economic Vacancy 11%
Stabilized Vacancy
& Collection Loss: 7%
Lease-up / Stabilization
Period N/A
Terminal Capitalization
Rate 8.25%
Discount Rate 10.50%
Selling Costs 2.00%
Growth Rates:
Income 3.00%
Expenses: 3.00%
DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW VALUE $8,400,000 * $42,000 / UNIT
RECONCILED INCOME
CAPITALIZATION VALUE $8,400,000 $42,000 / UNIT
SALES COMPARISON APPROACH
PRICE PER UNIT:
Range of Sales $/Unit (Unadjusted) $29,953 to $61,397
Range of Sales $/Unit (Adjusted) $40,334 to $48,350
VALUE INDICATION - PRICE PER UNIT $8,400,000 * $42,000 / UNIT
EGIM ANALYSIS
Range of EGIMs from Improved Sales 4.12 to 6.75
Selected EGIM for Subject 5.50
Subject's Projected EGI $1,530,726
EGIM ANALYSIS CONCLUSION $8,400,000 * $42,000 / UNIT
NOI PER UNIT ANALYSIS CONCLUSION $8,400,000 * $42,000 / UNIT
RECONCILED SALES COMPARISON VALUE $8,400,000 $42,000 / UNIT
- -------------------
* Value indications are after adjustments for concessions, deferred maintenance,
excess land and lease-up costs, if any.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGE 8
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
PART THREE - SUMMARY OF VALUE CONCLUSIONS
SALES COMPARISON APPROACH:
Price Per Unit $8,400,000
NOI Per Unit $8,400,000
EGIM Multiplier $8,400,000
INDICATED VALUE BY SALES COMPARISON $8,400,000 $42,000 / UNIT
INCOME APPROACH:
Direct Capitalization Method: $8,300,000
Discounted Cash Flow Method: $8,400,000
INDICATED VALUE BY THE INCOME APPROACH $8,400,000 $42,000 / UNIT
RECONCILED OVERALL VALUE CONCLUSION: $8,400,000 $42,000 / UNIT
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. INTRODUCTION PAGE 9
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS,INDIANA
INTRODUCTION
IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBJECT
The subject property is located at 5421 Calder Way, Indianapolis, Marion County,
Indiana. Indianapolis identifies it as 005718.
SCOPE OF THE ASSIGNMENT
The property, neighborhood, and comparables were inspected by John Nolan on May
8, 2003. Ken Kapecki, MAI has not made a personal inspection of the subject
property. John Nolan performed the research, valuation analysis and wrote the
report. Ken Kapecki, MAI reviewed the report and concurs with the value. Ken
Kapecki, MAI and John Nolan have extensive experience in appraising similar
properties and meet the USPAP competency provision.
The scope of this investigation comprises the inspection of the property and the
collection, verification, and analysis of general and specific data pertinent to
the subject property. We have researched current improved sales and leases of
similar properties, analyzing them as to their comparability, and adjusting them
accordingly. We completed the Sales Comparison and Income Capitalization
Approaches to value. From these approaches to value, a concluded overall value
was made.
DATE OF VALUE AND REPORT
This appraisal was made to express the opinion of value as of May 8, 2003. The
date of the report is July 17, 2003.
PURPOSE AND USE OF APPRAISAL
The purpose of the appraisal is to estimate the market value of the fee simple
interest in the subject property. It is understood that the appraisal is
intended to assist the clients in litigation settlement proceedings. The
appraisal was not based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation,
or the approval of a loan.
PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED
We have appraised the Fee Simple Estate in the subject property (as applied in
the Sales & Income Approaches), subject to the existing short-term leases. A Fee
Simple Estate is
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. INTRODUCTION PAGE 10
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
defined in The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 3rd ed. (Chicago: Appraisal
Institute, 1993), as:
"Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate,
subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of
taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat."
MARKETING/EXPOSURE PERIOD
MARKETING PERIOD: 6 to 12 months
EXPOSURE PERIOD: 6 to 12 months
HISTORY OF THE PROPERTY
Ownership in the subject property is currently vested in MBRF 87-1. To the best
of our knowledge, no transfers of ownership or offers to purchase the subject
are known to have occurred during the past three years.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. AREA ANALYSIS PAGE 11
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
AREA / NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS
NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS
A neighborhood is a group of complementary land uses. The function of the
neighborhood analysis is to describe the immediate surrounding environs. The
subject is located in the city of Indianapolis, Indiana. Overall, the
neighborhood is characterized as a suburban setting with the predominant land
use being residential. The subject's neighborhood is generally defined by the
following boundaries.
NEIGHBORHOOD BOUNDARIES
East - Franklin / Fall Creek Rd.
West - Rt. 37
South - Rt. 36/67
North - 75th St.
MAJOR EMPLOYERS
Major employers in the subject's area include Clarian Health Systems, Eli Lilly
and Company, Community Hospitals Indianapolis, Marsh/Village Pantry
Supermarkets, St. Vincent Hospital and Health Care, IUPUI, Kroger Central
Marketing Area, Rolls Royce, Federal Express, and St. Francis Hospital & Health
Centers. The overall economic outlook for the area is considered favorable.
DEMOGRAPHICS
We have reviewed demographic data within the neighborhood. The following table
summarizes the key data points.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. AREA ANALYSIS PAGE 12
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
NEIGHBORHOOD DEMOGRAPHICS
AREA
-----------------------------------------------
CATEGORY 1-MI. RADIUS 3-MI. RADIUS 5-MI. RADIUS MSA
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
POPULATION TRENDS
Current Population 10,594 77,643 210,001 1,646,584
5-Year Population 10,381 76,291 210,018 1,750,376
% Change CY-5Y -2.0% -1.7% 0.0% 6.3%
Annual Change CY-5Y -0.4% -0.3% 0.0% 1.3%
HOUSEHOLDS
Current Households 4,432 31,733 88,142 648,288
5-Year Projected Households 4,391 31,679 89,140 696,995
% Change CY - 5Y -0.9% -0.2% 1.1% 7.5%
Annual Change CY-5Y -0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 1.5%
INCOME TRENDS
Median Household Income $ 36,646 $ 37,154 $ 37,721 $ 47,488
Per Capita Income $ 21,925 $ 22,026 $ 22,823 $ 24,134
Average Household Income $ 52,011 $ 54,380 $ 54,501 $ 61,296
Source: Demographics Now
The subject neighborhood's population is expected to show increases below that
of the region. The immediate market offers inferior income levels as compared to
the broader market.
The following table illustrates the housing statistics in the subject's
immediate area, as well as the MSA region.
HOUSING TRENDS
AREA
-----------------------------------------------
CATEGORY 1-MI. RADIUS 3-MI. RADIUS 5-MI. RADIUS MSA
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOUSING TRENDS
% of Households Renting 46.33% 35.81% 37.13% 29.55%
5-Year Projected % Renting 45.49% 35.10% 36.15% 28.58%
% of Households Owning 47.94% 55.58% 54.10% 63.75%
5-Year Projected % Owning 48.79% 56.42% 55.27% 65.18%
Source: Demographics Now
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. AREA ANALYSIS PAGE 13
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
SURROUNDING IMPROVEMENTS
The following uses surround the subject property:
North - Multi-Family Residential
South - Single-Family Residential
East - I-465
West - Single-Family Residential
CONCLUSIONS
The subject is well located within the city of Indianapolis. The neighborhood is
characterized as being mostly suburban in nature and is currently in the stable
stage of development. The economic outlook for the neighborhood is judged to be
favorable with a good economic base.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. MARKET ANALYSIS PAGE 14
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
MARKET ANALYSIS
The subject property is located in the city of Indianapolis in Marion County.
The overall pace of development in the subject's market is more or less stable.
Approximately 2,550 new units are projected to be constructed in the
Indianapolis Metro Area in 2003. This would represent a slight increase from
2002 constructed units of 2,439. The new construction is primarily occurring on
the northwest side of town, on the southwest suburbs near the airport, and
downtown. No new construction is anticipated in the subject's immediate
neighborhood. (Source: CB Richard Ellis) The following table illustrates
historical vacancy rates for the subject's market.
HISTORICAL VACANCY RATE
Period Region Submarket
- ---------------------------
2002 9.3% 10.4%
2001 9.4% 9.3%
2000 8.8% 9.4%
1999 7.8% 9.2%
1998 7.9% 8.9%
1997 7.8% 6.4%
1996 7.7% 8.1%
1995 7.7% 6.8%
1994 7.7% 6.2%
Source: CB Richard Ellis, US Census Bureau
Occupancy trends in the subject's market are decreasing. Historically speaking,
the subject's submarket has equated the overall market. Vacancy rates in the
area have been increasing for the past three years due primarily to the US
recession and decreasing mortgage rates. Low mortgage rates have enticed many
former renters to purchase homes. To encourage leasing activity, apartment
managers have decreased rents, and offered rent concessions such as free rent or
waiving security deposits. In addition, many properties have added/improved
amenities such as swimming pools, tennis courts, fitness rooms, and clubhouses.
While the Indianapolis economy has been affected by the recession of the early
2000's, its economy is strong relative to other major US cities.
Market rents in the subject's market have been following an increasing trend.
The following table illustrates historical rental rates for the subject's
market.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. MARKET ANALYSIS PAGE 15
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
HISTORICAL AVERAGE RENT
Period Region % Change Submarket % Change
- --------------------------------------------------
1993 $609 - N/A -
1994 $637 4.6% N/A N/A
1995 $659 3.5% N/A N/A
1996 $684 3.8% N/A N/A
1997 $703 2.8% N/A N/A
1998 $730 3.8% N/A N/A
1999 $747 2.3% N/A N/A
2000 $767 2.7% N/A N/A
2001 $779 1.6% N/A N/A
2002 $787 1.0% N/A N/A
The following table illustrates a summary of the subject's competitive set.
COMPETITIVE PROPERTIES
No. Property Name Units Ocpy. Year Built Proximity to subject
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R-1 Cottages at Fall Creek 770 92% 1970 0.5 miles NW of the subject
R-2 Salem Courthouse 388 73% 1979 0.5 miles north of the subject
R-3 The Orchard 378 95% 1973 0.25 miles east of the subject
R-4 Churchill Ranch 134 91% 1973 Within 5-mile radius
R-5 Lake Castleton 1,265 92% 1980 2.5 miles N of subject
Subject Hunt Club 200 93% 1973
The current trend toward low interest rates has increased the percentage of
homeowners to renters. Consequently, the market has worsened for rental
properties with rents dropping and vacancies increasing.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PAGE 16
HUNT CLUB,INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
SITE ANALYSIS
Site Area 17.994 acres, or 783,819 square feet
Shape Irregular
Topography Slightly slope
Utilities All necessary utilities are available
to the site.
Soil Conditions Stable
Easements Affecting Site None other than typical utility easements
Overall Site Appeal Average
Flood Zone:
Community Panel 18097C0160 E, dated January 5, 2001
Flood Zone Zone X
Zoning D-6, the subject improvements represent a
legal conforming use of the site.
REAL ESTATE TAXES
ASSESSED VALUE - 2002
--------------------------- TAX RATE / PROPERTY
PARCEL NUMBER LAND BUILDING TOTAL MILL RATE TAXES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
005718 $453,300 $4,029,500 $4,482,800 0.04023 $180,334
IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS
Year Built 1973
Number of Units 200
Net Rentable Area 202,848 Square Feet
Construction:
Foundation Reinforced concrete slab
Frame Heavy or light wood
Exterior Walls Brick or masonry
Roof Composition shingle over a wood truss
structure
Project Amenities Amenities at the subject include a swimming
pool, spa/jacuzzi, gym room, barbeque
equipment, meeting hall, laundry room, and
secured parking.
Unit Amenities Individual unit amenities include a balcony,
cable TV connection, and washer dryer
connection. Appliances available in each unit
include a refrigerator, stove, dishwasher,
water heater, garbage disposal, and oven.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PAGE 17
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
Unit Mix:
Unit Area
Unit Type Number of Units (Sq. Ft.)
1Br/1Ba 56 800
2Br/2Ba 72 1,052
2Br/2Ba 32 1,072
2Br/2Ba 40 1,200
Overall Condition Average
Effective Age 25 years
Economic Life 45 years
Remaining Economic Life 20 years
Deferred Maintenance None
HIGHEST AND BEST USE ANALYSIS
In accordance with the definition of highest and best use, an analysis of the
site relating to its legal uses, physical possibilities, and financial
feasibility is appropriate. The highest and best use as vacant is to hold for
future multi-family development. The subject improvements were constructed in
1973 and consist of a 200-unit multifamily project. The highest and best use as
improved is for a continued multifamily use. Overall, the highest and best use
of the subject property is the continued use of the existing apartment project.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. VALUATION PROCEDURE PAGE 18
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
THE VALUATION PROCEDURE
There are three traditional approaches, which can be employed in establishing
the market value of the subject property. These approaches and their
applicability to the valuation of the subject are summarized as follows:
THE COST APPROACH
The application of the Cost Approach is based on the principle of substitution.
This principle may be stated as follows: no one is justified in paying more for
a property than that amount by which he or she can obtain, by purchase of a site
and construction of a building, without undue delay, a property of equal
desirability and utility. In the case of a new building, no deficiencies in the
building should exist.
In the case of income-producing real estate, the cost of construction plays a
minor and relatively insignificant role in determining market value. The Cost
Approach is typically only a reliable indicator of value for: (a) new
properties; (b) special use properties; and (c) where the cost of reproducing
the improvements is easily and accurately quantified and there is no economic
obsolescence. In all instances, the issue of an appropriate entrepreneurial
profit - the reward for undertaking the risk of construction, remains a highly
subjective factor especially in a market lacking significant speculative
development.
THE SALES COMPARISON APPROACH
The Sales Comparison Approach is an estimate of value based upon a process of
comparing recent sales of similar properties in the surrounding or competing
areas to the subject property. Inherent in this approach is the principle of
substitution.
The application of this approach consists of comparing the subject property with
similar properties of the same general type, which have been sold recently or
currently are available for sale in competing areas. This comparative process
involves judgment as to the similarity of the subject property and the
comparable sale with respect to many value factors such as location, contract
rent levels, quality of construction, reputation and prestige, age and
condition, among others. The estimated value through this approach represents
the probable price at which a willing seller would sell the subject property to
a willing and knowledgeable buyer as of the date of value.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. VALUATION PROCEDURE PAGE 19
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
THE INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH
The theory of the Income Capitalization Approach is based on the premise that
present value is the value of the cash flow and reversionary value the property
will produce over a reasonable holding (ownership) period.
The Discounted Cash Flow Analysis will convert equity cash flows (including cash
flows and equity reversion) into a present value utilizing an internal rate of
return (or discount rate). The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) will be derived
from a comparison of alternate investments, a comparative analysis of IRR's used
by recent buyers of similar properties, and a review of published industry
surveys.
The Direct Capitalization Analysis converts one year of income into an overall
value using overall capitalization rates from similar sales. The overall rates
take into consideration buyers assumptions of the market over the long-term.
The results of the Income Capitalization Analysis are usually the primary value
indicator for income producing properties. Investors expect a reasonable rate of
return on their equity investment based on the ownership risks involved; this
approach closely parallels the investment decision process.
RECONCILIATION
In this instance, we have completed the Sales Comparison and Income
Capitalization Approaches to value. As an income producing property, the income
approach is a primary approach to value. The Sales Comparison Approach is also
considered reliable as investors are buying similar buildings in the market.
Our research indicates that market participants are generally not buying,
selling, investing, or lending with reliance placed on the methodology of the
Cost Approach to establish the value. Therefore, we have decided that the Cost
Approach is not a reliable indicator of value for the subject, and this approach
has not been utilized.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. SALES COMPARISON APPROACH PAGE 20
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
SALES COMPARISON APPROACH
Use of market or comparable sales requires the collection and analysis of
comparable sales data. Similar properties recently sold are compared to the
subject and adjusted based on any perceived differences. This method is based on
the premise that the costs of acquiring a substitute property would tend to
establish a value for the subject property. The premise suggests that if a
substitute is unavailable in the market, the reliability of the approach may be
subordinate to the other approaches.
The reliance on substitute properties produces shortcomings in the validity of
this approach. Geographic and demographic characteristics from each submarket
restrict which sales may be selected. Recent sales with a similar physical
characteristics, income levels, and location are usually limited. The sales we
have identified, however, do establish general valuation parameters as well as
provide support to our conclusion derived through the income approach method.
The standard unit of comparison among similar properties is the sales price per
unit and price per square foot of net rentable area. To accurately adjust prices
to satisfy the requirements of the sales comparison approach, numerous
calculations and highly subjective judgments would be required including
consideration of numerous income and expense details for which information may
be unreliable or unknown. The sales price per unit and square foot are
considered relevant to the investment decision, but primarily as a parameter
against which value estimates derived through the income approach can be judged
and compared.
In examining the comparable sales, we have applied a subjective adjustment
analysis, which includes specific adjustments derived from our experience and
consulting with the market participants.
SALES COMPARISON ANALYSIS
Detailed on the following pages are sales transactions involving properties
located in the subject's competitive investment market.
Photographs of the sale transactions are located in the Addenda. Following the
summary of sales is an adjustment grid that is used to arrive at a value.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. SALES COMPARISON APPROACH PAGE 21
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE SALES - IMPROVED
COMPARABLE
DESCRIPTION SUBJECT I - 1
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Property Name Hunt Club Carriagetree Apartments
(Monon Place Apts.)
LOCATION:
Address 5421 Calder Way 5900 Carvel Ave.
City, State Indianapolis, Indiana Indianapolis, IN
County Marion Marion
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS:
Net Rentable Area (SF) 202,848 140,492
Year Built 1973 1966
Number of Units 200 136
Unit Mix: Type Total Type Total
1Br/1Ba 56 1Br/1Ba 16
2Br/2Ba 72 2Br/1Ba 16
2Br/2Ba 32 2Br/2Ba 84
2Br/2Ba 40 3Br/2Ba 20
Average Unit Size (SF) 1,014 1,033
Land Area (Acre) 17.9940 8.0000
Density (Units/Acre) 11.1 17.0
Parking Ratio (Spaces/Unit) 2.00 2.00
Parking Type (Gr., Cov.,etc.) Garage, Open Covered Open, Covered
CONDITION: Good Good
APPEAL: Good Very Good
AMENITIES:
Pool/Spa Yes/Yes Yes/No
Gym Room Yes No
Laundry Room Yes Yes
Secured Parking Yes Yes
Sport Courts Yes Yes
Washer/Dryer Connection Yes Yes
OCCUPANCY: 93% 98%
TRANSACTION DATA:
Sale Date April, 2001
Sale Price ($) $8,350,000
Grantor
Grantee Buckingham Management
Sale Documentation
Verification
Telephone Number
ESTIMATED PRO-FORMA: Total $ $/Unit $/SF
Potential Gross Income $ 1,492,992 $ 10,978 $ 10.63
Vacancy/Credit Loss $ 44,790 $ 329 $ 0.32
---------------------------------
Effective Gross Income $ 1,448,202 $ 10,649 $ 10.31
Operating Expenses $ 796,511 $ 5,857 $ 5.67
---------------------------------
Net Operating Income $ 651,691 $ 4,792 $ 4.64
NOTES: None
PRICE PER UNIT $ 61,397
PRICE PER SQUARE FOOT $ 59.43
EXPENSE RATIO 55.0%
EGIM 5.77
OVERALL CAP RATE 7.80%
Cap Rate based on Pro Forma
or Actual Income? PRO FORMA
COMPARABLE COMPARABLE
DESCRIPTION I - 2 I - 3
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Property Name Arbor Green Apartments Arbor Green Apartments
LOCATION:
Address 3836 Arbor Green Lane 3836 Arbor Green Lane
City, State Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, IN
County Marion Marion
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS:
Net Rentable Area (SF) 181,152 181,152
Year Built 1989 1989
Number of Units 208 208
Unit Mix: Type Total Type Total
1Br/1Ba 48 1Br/1Ba 48
1Br/1Ba 56 1Br/1Ba 56
2Br/1Ba 16 2Br/1Ba 16
2Br/2Ba 72 2Br/2Ba 72
3Br/2Ba 16 3Br/2Ba 16
Average Unit Size (SF) 871 871
Land Area (Acre) 20.7750 20.7750
Density (Units/Acre) 10.0 10.0
Parking Ratio (Spaces/Unit) 2.00 2.00
Parking Type (Gr., Cov.,etc.) Open, Covered Open, Covered
CONDITION: Good Good
APPEAL: Good Good
AMENITIES:
Pool/Spa Yes/No Yes/No
Gym Room Yes Yes
Laundry Room Yes Yes
Secured Parking Yes Yes
Sport Courts Yes Yes
Washer/Dryer Connection Yes Yes
OCCUPANCY: 94% 94%
TRANSACTION DATA:
Sale Date September, 2002 May, 2001
Sale Price ($) $11,250,000 $9,400,000
Grantor Connor & Murphy
Grantee Ritter & Co Connor & Murphy
Sale Documentation
Verification
Telephone Number
ESTIMATED PRO-FORMA: Total $ $/Unit $/SF Total $ $/Unit $/SF
Potential Gross Income $ 1,719,264 $ 8,266 $ 9.49 $ 1,719,264 $ 8,266 $ 9.49
Vacancy/Credit Loss $ 51,578 $ 248 $ 0.28 $ 51,578 $ 248 $ 0.28
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective Gross Income $ 1,667,686 $ 8,018 $ 9.21 $ 1,667,686 $ 8,018 $ 9.21
Operating Expenses $ 917,227 $ 4,410 $ 5.06 $ 917,227 $ 4,410 $ 5.06
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Operating Income $ 750,459 $ 3,608 $ 4.14 $ 750,459 $ 3,608 $ 4.14
NOTES: None None
PRICE PER UNIT $ 54,087 $ 45,192
PRICE PER SQUARE FOOT $ 62.10 $ 51.89
EXPENSE RATIO 55.0% 55.0%
EGIM 6.75 5.64
OVERALL CAP RATE 6.67% 7.98%
Cap Rate based on Pro Forma
or Actual Income? PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
COMPARABLE COMPARABLE
DESCRIPTION I - 4 I - 5
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Property Name Hawthorn Heights Willows at Castleton
LOCATION:
Address 4850 E. 62nd 5850 Laketon Dr
City, State Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, IN
County Marion Marion
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS:
Net Rentable Area (SF) 240,929 257,135
Year Built 1967 1973
Number of Units 241 220
Unit Mix: Type Total Type Total
1Br/1Ba 1Br/1Ba 83
2Br/2Ba 2Br/2Ba 95
3Br/2Ba 3Br/2Ba 42
Average Unit Size (SF) 1,000 1,169
Land Area (Acre) 0.0000 22.9650
Density (Units/Acre) 9.6
Parking Ratio (Spaces/Unit) 2.00 2.00
Parking Type (Gr., Cov.,etc.) Garage, Open, Covered Open, Covered
CONDITION: Fair Very Good
APPEAL: Fair Very Good
AMENITIES:
Pool/Spa Yes/Yes Yes/Yes
Gym Room Yes Yes
Laundry Room Yes No
Secured Parking Yes Yes
Sport Courts Yes Yes
Washer/Dryer Connection Yes Yes
OCCUPANCY: 0% 0%
TRANSACTION DATA:
Sale Date September, 2001 November, 2000
Sale Price ($) $7,218,778 $11,000,000
Grantor Houlihan-Parnes JV CLK
Management Corp
Grantee New Plan Excel Connor & Murphy
Sale Documentation
Verification
Telephone Number
ESTIMATED PRO-FORMA: Total $ $/Unit $/SF Total $ $/Unit $/SF
Potential Gross Income $ 1,804,920 $ 7,489 $ 7.49 $ 1,824,600 $ 8,294 $ 7.10
Vacancy/Credit Loss $ 54,148 $ 225 $ 0.22 $ 54,738 $ 249 $ 0.21
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective Gross Income $ 1,750,772 $ 7,265 $ 7.27 $ 1,769,862 $ 8,045 $ 6.88
Operating Expenses $ 962,925 $ 3,996 $ 4.00 $ 973,424 $ 4,425 $ 3.79
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Operating Income $ 787,848 $ 3,269 $ 3.27 $ 796,438 $ 3,620 $ 3.10
NOTES: None 1998 Renovation
PRICE PER UNIT $ 29,953 $ 50,000
PRICE PER SQUARE FOOT $ 29.96 $ 42.78
EXPENSE RATIO 55.0% 55.0%
EGIM 4.12 6.22
OVERALL CAP RATE 10.91% 7.24%
Cap Rate based on Pro Forma
or Actual Income? PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. SALES COMPARISON APPROACH PAGE 22
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
IMPROVED SALES MAP
[MAP]
IMPROVED SALES ANALYSIS
The improved sales indicate a sales price range from $29,953 to $61,397 per
unit. Adjustments have been made to the sales to reflect differences in
location, age/condition and quality/appeal. Generally speaking, larger
properties typically have a lower price per unit when compared to smaller
properties, all else being equal. Similarly, those projects with a higher
average unit size will generally have a higher price per unit. After appropriate
adjustments are made, the improved sales demonstrate an adjusted range for the
subject from $40,334 to $48,350 per unit with a mean or average adjusted price
of $43,419 per unit. The median adjusted price is $42,000 per unit. Based on the
following analysis, we have concluded to a value of $42,000 per unit, which
results in an "as is" value of $8,400,000 (rounded after necessary adjustment,
if any).
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. SALES COMPARISON APPROACH PAGE 23
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
SALES ADJUSTMENT GRID
COMPARABLE
DESCRIPTION SUBJECT I - 1
- ------------------------------ -------------------------------- --------------------------------
Property Name Hunt Club Carriagetree Apartments
(Monon Place Apts.)
Address 5421 Calder Way 5900 Carvel Ave.
City Indianapolis, Indiana Indianapolis, IN
Sale Date April, 2001
Sale Price ($) $8,350,000
Net Rentable Area (SF) 202,848 140,492
Number of Units 200 136
Price Per Unit $61,397
Year Built 1973 1966
Land Area (Acre) 17.9940 8.0000
VALUE ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION ADJ.
Property Rights Conveyed Fee Simple Estate Fee Simple Estate 0%
Financing Cash To Seller 0%
Conditions of Sale Arm's Length 0%
Date of Sale (Time) 04-2001 5%
VALUE AFTER TRANS. ADJUST.
($/UNIT) $64,467
Location Superior -10%
Number of Units 200 136 -10%
Quality / Appeal Good Comparable 0%
Age / Condition 1973 1966 / Good 0%
Occupancy at Sale 93% 98% -5%
Amenities Good Comparable 0%
Average Unit Size (SF) 1,014 1,033 0%
PHYSICAL ADJUSTMENT -25%
FINAL ADJUSTED VALUE ($/UNIT) $48,350
COMPARABLE COMPARABLE
DESCRIPTION I - 2 I - 3
- -------------------------------- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
Property Name Arbor Green Apartments Arbor Green Apartments
Address 3836 Arbor Green Lane 3836 Arbor Green Lane
City Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, IN
Sale Date September, 2002 May, 2001
Sale Price ($) $11,250,000 $9,400,000
Net Rentable Area (SF) 181,152 181,152
Number of Units 208 208
Price Per Unit $54,087 $45,192
Year Built 1989 1989
Land Area (Acre) 20.7750 20.7750
VALUE ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIPTION ADJ. DESCRIPTION ADJ.
Property Rights Conveyed Fee Simple Estate 0% Fee Simple Estate 0%
Financing Cash To Seller 0% Cash To Seller 0%
Conditions of Sale Arm's Length 0% Arm's Length 0%
Date of Sale (Time) 09-2002 0% 05-2001 5%
VALUE AFTER TRANS. ADJUST.
($/UNIT) $54,087 $47,452
Location Comparable 0% Comparable 0%
Number of Units 208 0% 208 0%
Quality / Appeal Comparable 0% Comparable 0%
Age / Condition 1989 / Good -10% 1989 / Good -10%
Occupancy at Sale 94% 0% 94% 0%
Amenities Comparable 0% Comparable 0%
Average Unit Size (SF) 871 -5% 871 -5%
PHYSICAL ADJUSTMENT -15% -15%
FINAL ADJUSTED VALUE ($/UNIT) $45,974 $40,334
COMPARABLE COMPARABLE
DESCRIPTION I - 4 I - 5
- -------------------------------- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
Property Name Hawthorn Heights Willows at Castleton
Address 4850 E. 62nd 5850 Laketon Dr
City Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, IN
Sale Date September, 2001 November, 2000
Sale Price ($) $7,218,778 $11,000,000
Net Rentable Area (SF) 240,929 257,135
Number of Units 241 220
Price Per Unit $29,953 $50,000
Year Built 1967 1973
Land Area (Acre) 22.9650
VALUE ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIPTION ADJ. DESCRIPTION ADJ.
Property Rights Conveyed Fee Simple Estate 0% Fee Simple Estate 0%
Financing Cash To Seller 0% Cash To Seller 0%
Conditions of Sale Arm's Length 0% Arm's Length 0%
Date of Sale (Time) 09-2001 0% 11-2000 5%
VALUE AFTER TRANS. ADJUST.
($/UNIT) $29,953 $52,500
Location Inferior 15% Superior -10%
Number of Units 241 5% 220 0%
Quality / Appeal Comparable 0% Comparable 0%
Age / Condition 1967 / Fair 15% 1973 / Very Good -10%
Occupancy at Sale 0% 0%
Amenities Comparable 0% Comparable 0%
Average Unit Size (SF) 1,000 0% 1,169 0%
PHYSICAL ADJUSTMENT 35% -20%
FINAL ADJUSTED VALUE ($/UNIT) $40,437 $42,000
SUMMARY
VALUE RANGE (PER UNIT) $ 40,334 TO $ 48,350
MEAN (PER UNIT) $ 43,419
MEDIAN (PER UNIT) $ 42,000
VALUE CONCLUSION (PER UNIT) $ 42,000
VALUE OF IMPROVEMENT & MAIN SITE $ 8,400,000
PV OF CONCESSIONS -$ 20,000
VALUE INDICATED BY SALES COMPARISON
APPROACH $ 8,380,000
ROUNDED $ 8,400,000
NET OPERATING INCOME (NOI) ANALYSIS
We have also conducted a net operating income (NOI) comparison analysis. The NOI
effectively takes into account the various physical, location, and operating
aspects of the sale. When the subject's NOI is compared to the sale NOI, a
percent adjustment can be arrived at. The following table illustrates this
analysis.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. SALES COMPARISON APPROACH PAGE 24
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
NOI PER UNIT COMPARISON
SALE PRICE NOI/ SUBJECT NOI
COMPARABLE NO. OF ---------- -------- -------------- ADJUSTMENT INDICATED
NO. UNITS PRICE/UNIT OAR NOI/UNIT SUBJ. NOI/UNIT FACTOR VALUE/UNIT
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I-1 136 $ 8,350,000 7.80% $ 651,691 $ 642,287 0.670 $ 41,148
$ 61,397 $ 4,792 $ 3,211
I-2 208 $ 11,250,000 6.67% $ 750,459 $ 642,287 0.890 $ 48,142
$ 54,087 $ 3,608 $ 3,211
I-3 208 $ 9,400,000 7.98% $ 750,459 $ 642,287 0.890 $ 40,225
$ 45,192 $ 3,608 $ 3,211
I-4 241 $ 7,218,778 10.91% $ 787,848 $ 642,287 0.982 $ 29,425
$ 29,953 $ 3,269 $ 3,211
I-5 220 $ 11,000,000 7.24% $ 796,438 $ 642,287 0.887 $ 44,355
$ 50,000 $ 3,620 $ 3,211
PRICE/UNIT
Low High Average Median
$ 29,425 $ 48,142 $ 40,659 $ 41,148
VALUE ANALYSIS BASED ON COMPARABLES NOI PER UNIT
Estimated Price Per Unit $ 42,000
-----------
Number of Units 200
Value $ 8,400,000
PV of Concessions $ -20,000
-----------
Value Based on NOI Analysis $ 8,380,000
Rounded $ 8,400,000
The adjusted sales indicate a range of value between $29,425 and $48,142 per
unit, with an average of $40,659 per unit. Based on the subject's competitive
position within the improved sales, a value of $42,000 per unit is estimated.
This indicates an "as is" market value of $8,400,000 (rounded after necessary
adjustment, if any) for the NOI Per Unit Analysis.
EFFECTIVE GROSS INCOME MULTIPLIER (EGIM) ANALYSIS
The effective gross income multiplier (EGIM) is derived by dividing the sales
price by the total effective gross income. The following table illustrates the
EGIMs for the comparable improved sales.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. SALES COMPARISON APPROACH PAGE 25
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
EFFECTIVE GROSS INCOME MULTIPLIER COMPARISON
SALE PRICE
COMPARABLE NO. OF ---------- EFFECTIVE OPERATING SUBJECT
NO. UNITS PRICE/UNIT GROSS INCOME EXPENSE OER PROJECTED OER EGIM
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I-1 136 $ 8,350,000 $ 1,448,202 $ 796,511 55.00% 5.77
$ 61,397
I-2 208 $ 11,250,000 $ 1,667,686 $ 917,227 55.00% 6.75
$ 54,087
I-3 208 $ 9,400,000 $ 1,667,686 $ 917,227 55.00% 55.43% 5.64
$ 45,192
I-4 241 $ 7,218,778 $ 1,750,772 $ 962,925 55.00% 4.12
$ 29,953
I-5 220 $ 11,000,000 $ 1,769,862 $ 973,424 55.00% 6.22
$ 50,000
EGIM
Low High Average Median
- --- ---- ------- ------
4.12 6.75 5.70 5.77
VALUE ANALYSIS BASED ON EGIM'S OF COMPARABLE SALES
Estimate EGIM 5.50
------------
Subject EGI $ 1,530,726
Value $ 8,418,993
PV of Concessions -$ 20,000
------------
Value Based on EGIM Analysis $ 8,398,993
Rounded $ 8,400,000
Value Per Unit $ 42,000
There is an inverse relationship, which generally holds among EGIMs and
operating expenses. Properties, which have higher expense ratios, typically sell
for relatively less and therefore produce a lower EGIM. As will be illustrated
in the Income Capitalization Approach of this report, the subject's operating
expense ratio (OER) is estimated at 55.43% before reserves. The comparable sales
indicate an expense ratio of 55.00%, while their EGIMs range from 4.12 to 6.75.
Overall, we conclude to an EGIM of 5.50, which results in an "as is" value
estimate in the EGIM Analysis of $8,400,000.
SALES COMPARISON CONCLUSION
The three valuation methods in the Sales Comparison Approach are shown below.
The overall value via the Sales Comparison Approach is estimated at $8,400,000.
Price Per Unit $8,400,000
NOI Per Unit $8,400,000
EGIM Analysis $8,400,000
Sales Comparison Conclusion $8,400,000
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH PAGE 26
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH
The income capitalization approach is based on the premise that value is created
by the expectation of future benefits. We estimated the present value of those
benefits to derive an indication of the amount that a prudent, informed
purchaser-investor would pay for the right to receive them as of the date of
value.
This approach requires an estimate of the NOI of a property. The estimated NOI
is then converted to a value indication by use of either the direct
capitalization or the discounted cash flow analysis (yield capitalization).
Direct capitalization uses a single year's stabilized NOI as a basis for a value
indication by dividing the income by a capitalization rate. The rate chosen
accounts for a recapture of the investment by the investor and should reflect
all factors that influence the value of the property, such as tenant quality,
property condition, neighborhood change, market trends, interest rates, and
inflation. The rate may be extracted from local market transactions or, when
transaction evidence is lacking, obtained from trade sources.
A discounted cash flow analysis focuses on the operating cash flows expected
from the property and the proceeds of a hypothetical sale at the end of a
holding period (the reversion). The cash flows and reversion are discounted to
their present values using a market-derived discount rate and are added together
to obtain a value indication. Because benefits to be received in the future are
worth less than the same benefits received in the present, this method weights
income in the early years more heavily than the income and the sale proceeds to
be received later. The strength of the discounted cash flow method is its
ability to recognize variations in projected net income, such as those caused by
inflation, stepped leases, neighborhood change, or tenant turnover. Its weakness
is that it requires many judgments regarding the actions of likely buyers and
sellers of the property in the future.
In some situations, both methods yield a similar result. The discounted cash
flow method is typically more appropriate for the analysis of investment
properties with multiple or long-term leases, particularly leases with
cancellation clauses or renewal options. It is especially useful for
multi-tenant properties in volatile markets. The direct capitalization
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH PAGE 27
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
method is normally more appropriate for properties with relatively stable
operating histories and expectations.
A pro forma analysis for the first year of the investment is made to estimate a
reasonable potential net operating income for the Subject Property. Such an
analysis entails an estimate of the gross income the property should command in
the marketplace. From this total gross income must be deducted an allowance for
vacancy/collection loss and operating expenses as dictated by general market
conditions and the overall character of the subject's tenancy and leased income
to arrive at a projected estimate of net operating income. Conversion of the net
operating income to an indication of value is accomplished by the process of
capitalization, as derived primarily from market data.
MARKET RENT ANALYSIS
In order to determine a market rental rate for the subject, a survey of
competing apartment communities was performed. This survey was displayed
previously in the market analysis section of the report. Detailed information
pertaining to each of the comparable rental communities, along with photographs,
is presented in the Addenda of this report.
The following charts display the subject's current asking and actual rent rates
as well as a comparison with the previous referenced comparable rental
properties.
SUMMARY OF ACTUAL AVERAGE RENTS
Average
Unit Area -----------------
Unit Type (Sq. Ft.) Per Unit Per SF %Occupied
- -----------------------------------------------------
1Br/1Ba 800 $ 549 $ 0.69 85.7%
2Br/2Ba 1052 $ 619 $ 0.59 97.2%
2Br/2Ba 1072 $ 639 $ 0.60 97.5%
2Br/2Ba 1200 $ 689 $ 0.57 93.8%
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH PAGE 28
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
RENT ANALYSIS
COMPARABLE RENTS
----------------
R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-5
-----------------------------------------------------------
Cottages at Salem The Churchill Lake
Fall Creek Courthouse Orchard Ranch Castleton
-----------------------------------------------------------
COMPARISON TO SUBJECT
SUBJECT SUBJECT -----------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT UNIT ACTUAL ASKING Slightly Slightly Slightly
DESCRIPTION TYPE RENT RENT Superior Superior Superior Superior Similar
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monthly Rent 1BR/1BA $ 549 $ 549 $ 585 $ 519 $ 583 $ 778
Unit Area (SF) 800 800 737 713 745 823
Monthly Rent Per Sq. Ft $ 0.69 $ 0.69 $ 0.79 $ 0.73 $ 0.78 $ 0.94
Monthly Rent 2BR/2BA $ 619 $ 619 $ 669 $ 600 $ 681 $ 570 $ 745
Unit Area (SF) 1,052 1,052 1,056 931 960 930 944
Monthly Rent Per Sq. Ft $ 0.59 $ 0.59 $ 0.63 $ 0.64 $ 0.71 $ 0.61 $ 0.79
Monthly Rent 2BR/2BA $ 639 $ 639 $ 779 $ 695 $ 810
Unit Area (SF) 1,072 1,072 1,120 1,190 1,065
Monthly Rent Per Sq. Ft $ 0.60 $ 0.60 $ 0.70 $ 0.58 $ 0.76
Monthly Rent 2BR/2BA $ 689 $ 689 $ 1,100 $ 775 $ 975
Unit Area (SF) 1,200 1,200 1,700 1,460 1,291
Monthly Rent Per Sq. Ft $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.65 $ 0.53 $ 0.76
DESCRIPTION MIN MAX MEDIAN AVERAGE
- -----------------------------------------------------------------
Monthly Rent $ 519 $ 778 $ 584 $ 616
Unit Area (SF) 713 823 741 755
Monthly Rent Per Sq. Ft $ 0.73 $ 0.94 $ 0.79 $ 0.81
Monthly Rent $ 570 $ 745 $ 669 $ 653
Unit Area (SF) 930 1,056 944 964
Monthly Rent Per Sq. Ft $ 0.61 $ 0.79 $ 0.64 $ 0.68
Monthly Rent $ 695 $ 810 $ 779 $ 761
Unit Area (SF) 1,065 1,190 1,120 1,125
Monthly Rent Per Sq. Ft $ 0.58 $ 0.76 $ 0.70 $ 0.68
Monthly Rent $ 775 $ 1,100 $ 975 $ 950
Unit Area (SF) 1,291 1,700 1,460 1,484
Monthly Rent Per Sq. Ft $ 0.53 $ 0.76 $ 0.65 $ 0.64
CONCLUDED MARKET RENTAL RATES AND TERMS
Based on this analysis above, the subject's concluded market rental rates and
gross rental income is calculated as follows:
GROSS RENTAL INCOME PROJECTION
Market Rent
Unit Area ----------------- Monthly Annual
Unit Type Number of Units (Sq. Ft.) Per Unit Per SF Income Income
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1Br/1Ba 56 800 $ 575 $ 0.72 $ 32,200 $ 386,400
2Br/2Ba 72 1,052 $ 650 $ 0.62 $ 46,800 $ 561,600
2Br/2Ba 32 1,072 $ 675 $ 0.63 $ 21,600 $ 259,200
2Br/2Ba 40 1,200 $ 720 $ 0.60 $ 28,800 $ 345,600
-------- ----------
Total $129,400 $1,552,800
PRO FORMA ANALYSIS
For purposes of this appraisal, we were provided with income and expense data
for the subject property. A summary of this data is presented on the following
page.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH PAGE 29
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL INCOME & EXPENSES
FISCAL YEAR 2000 FISCAL YEAR 2001 FISCAL YEAR 2002
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
DESCRIPTION TOTAL PER UNIT TOTAL PER UNIT TOTAL PER UNIT
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenues
Rental Income $1,576,453 $ 7,882 $1,610,329 $ 8,052 $1,577,895 $ 7,889
Vacancy $ 101,295 $ 506 $ 132,307 $ 662 $ 119,312 $ 597
Credit Loss/Concessions $ 50,585 $ 253 $ 37,460 $ 187 $ 48,944 $ 245
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal $ 151,880 $ 759 $ 169,767 $ 849 $ 168,256 $ 841
Laundry Income $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Garage Revenue $ 7,730 $ 39 $ 5,367 $ 27 $ 3,569 $ 18
Other Misc. Revenue $ 55,549 $ 278 $ 91,410 $ 457 $ 80,530 $ 403
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal Other Income $ 63,279 $ 316 $ 96,777 $ 484 $ 84,099 $ 420
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective Gross Income $1,487,852 $ 7,439 $1,537,339 $ 7,687 $1,493,738 $ 7,469
Operating Expenses
Taxes $ 148,746 $ 744 $ 154,868 $ 774 $ 169,548 $ 848
Insurance $ 18,972 $ 95 $ 30,682 $ 153 $ 33,900 $ 170
Utilities $ 169,885 $ 849 $ 227,066 $ 1,135 $ 193,215 $ 966
Repair & Maintenance $ 65,498 $ 327 $ 51,588 $ 258 $ 52,193 $ 261
Cleaning $ 72,760 $ 364 $ 66,412 $ 332 $ 54,999 $ 275
Landscaping $ 33,983 $ 170 $ 27,534 $ 138 $ 37,212 $ 186
Security $ 4,554 $ 23 $ 9,108 $ 46 $ 4,754 $ 24
Marketing & Leasing $ 27,160 $ 136 $ 28,960 $ 145 $ 35,348 $ 177
General Administrative $ 194,016 $ 970 $ 188,397 $ 942 $ 165,502 $ 828
Management $ 76,891 $ 384 $ 76,388 $ 382 $ 75,718 $ 379
Miscellaneous $ 22,849 $ 114 $ 2,767 $ 14 $ 38,861 $ 194
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Operating Expenses $ 835,314 $ 4,177 $ 863,770 $ 4,319 $ 861,250 $ 4,306
Reserves $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income $ 652,538 $ 3,263 $ 673,569 $ 3,368 $ 632,488 $ 3,162
FISCAL YEAR 2003 ANNUALIZED 2003
-------------------- --------------------
MANAGEMENT BUDGET PROJECTION AAA PROJECTION
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------------
DESCRIPTION TOTAL PER UNIT TOTAL PER UNIT TOTAL PER UNIT %
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenues
Rental Income $1,625,232 $ 8,126 $1,553,544 $ 7,768 $1,552,800 $ 7,764 100.0%
Vacancy $ 122,891 $ 614 $ 140,408 $ 702 $ 77,640 $ 388 5.0%
Credit Loss/Concessions $ 50,412 $ 252 $ 69,476 $ 347 $ 31,056 $ 155 2.0%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal $ 173,304 $ 867 $ 209,884 $ 1,049 $ 108,696 $ 543 7.0%
Laundry Income $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0.0%
Garage Revenue $ 3,676 $ 18 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,676 $ 18 0.2%
Other Misc. Revenue $ 82,946 $ 415 $ 75,112 $ 376 $ 82,946 $ 415 5.3%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal Other Income $ 86,622 $ 433 $ 75,112 $ 376 $ 86,622 $ 433 5.6%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective Gross Income $ 1,538,55 $ 7,693 $1,418,772 $ 7,094 $1,530,726 $ 7,654 100.0%
Operating Expenses
Taxes $ 174,634 $ 873 $ 231,548 $ 1,158 $ 174,634 $ 873 11.4%
Insurance $ 34,917 $ 175 $ 36,496 $ 182 $ 34,917 $ 175 2.3%
Utilities $ 199,011 $ 995 $ 356,528 $ 1,783 $ 199,011 $ 995 13.0%
Repair & Maintenance $ 53,759 $ 269 $ 80,716 $ 404 $ 53,759 $ 269 3.5%
Cleaning $ 56,649 $ 283 $ 67,240 $ 336 $ 56,649 $ 283 3.7%
Landscaping $ 38,328 $ 192 $ 24,388 $ 122 $ 38,328 $ 192 2.5%
Security $ 4,897 $ 24 $ 680,20 $ 3 $ 4,897 $ 24 0.3%
Marketing & Leasing $ 36,408 $ 182 $ 34,520 $ 173 $ 36,408 $ 182 2.4%
General Administrative $ 170,467 $ 852 $ 134,192 $ 671 $ 170,467 $ 852 11.1%
Management $ 77,990 $ 390 $ 69,008 $ 345 $ 76,536 $ 383 5.0%
Miscellaneous $ 40,027 $ 200 $ 11,328 $ 57 $ 2,832 $ 14 0.2%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Operating Expenses $ 887,088 $ 4,435 $1,046,644 $ 5,233 $ 848,439 $ 4,242 55.4%
Reserves $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 40,000 $ 200 4.7%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income $ 651,463 $ 3,257 $ 372,128 $ 1,861 $ 642,287 $ 3,211 42.0%
REVENUES AND EXPENSES
The subject's revenue and expense projections are displayed on the previous
chart. Rental income is based on the market analysis previously discussed. Other
income consists of forfeited deposits, laundry income, late rent payments, month
to month fees, pet fees, vending machine revenue, etc.
We forecasted the property's annual operating expenses after reviewing its
historical performance at the subject property. We analyzed each item of expense
and attempted to forecast amounts a typical informed investor would consider
reasonable.
VACANCY AND COLLECTION LOSS
An investor is primarily interested in the annual revenue an income property is
likely to produce over a specified period of time, rather than the income it
could produce if it were always 100% occupied and all tenants were paying their
rent in full and on time. An investor normally expects some income loss as
tenants vacate, fail to pay rent, or pay their rent late.
We have projected a stabilized vacancy and collection loss rate of 7% based on
the subject's historical performance, as well as the anticipated future market
conditions.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH PAGE 30
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
RESERVES FOR REPLACEMENT
"Reserves for replacements" is a contingency account allocated to the expenses
of the property to provide for replacement of short-lived items and for
unforeseen necessary capital expenditures. We have utilized the Korpacz Real
Estate Investor Survey of the national apartment market, which reports a range
of replacement reserves between $150 and $400 per unit. For purposes of this
analysis, we have included an allowance of $200 per unit for reserves for
replacement.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Capital expenditures represent expenses for immediate repair or replacement of
items that have average to long lives. Based on our inspection of the property
as well as discussions with property management personnel, there are no major
items remaining in need of repair or replacement that would require an expense
beyond our reserves for replacement. Therefore an allowance of $200 per unit
should be satisfactory in our reserves for replacement to cover future capital
expenditures.
DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
As the subject is a multi-tenant income property, the Discounted Cash Flow
Method is considered appropriate. This method is especially meaningful in that
it isolates the timing of the annual cash flows and discounts them, along with
the expected equity reversion, to a present value. The present value of the cash
flow is added to the present value of the reversion, resulting in a total
property value.
INVESTMENT CRITERIA
Appropriate investment criteria will be derived for the subject based upon
analysis of comparable sales and a survey of real estate investors. The
following table summarizes the findings of Korpacz National Investor Survey for
the most recent period.
KORPACZ NATIONAL INVESTOR SURVEY
1ST QUARTER 2003
NATIONAL APARTMENT MARKET
CAPITALIZATION RATES
----------------------------------------------
GOING-IN TERMINAL
----------------------------------------------
LOW HIGH LOW HIGH
----------------------------------------------
RANGE 6.00% 10.00% 7.00% 10.00%
AVERAGE 8.14% 8.47%
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH PAGE 31
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
SUMMARY OF OVERALL
CAPITALIZATION RATES
COMP. NO. SALE DATE OCCUP. PRICE/UNIT OAR
- --------- --------- ------ ---------- ---
I-1 Apr-01 98% $61,397 7.80%
I-2 Sep-02 94% $54,087 6.67%
I-3 May-01 94% $45,192 7.98%
I-4 Sep-01 0% $29,953 10.91%
I-5 Nov-00 0% $50,000 7.24%
High 10.91%
Low 6.67%
Average 8.12%
Based on this information, we have concluded the subject's overall
capitalization rate should be 7.75%. The terminal capitalization rate is applied
to the net operating income estimated for the year following the end of the
holding period. Based on the concluded overall capitalization rate, the age of
the property and the surveyed information, we have concluded the subject's
terminal capitalization rate to be 8.25%. Finally, the subject's discount rate
or yield rate is estimated based on the previous investor survey and an
examination of returns available on alternative investments in the market. Based
on this analysis, the subject's discount rate is estimated to be 10.50%.
HOLDING PERIOD
The survey of investors indicates that most investors are completing either
10-year cash flows or extending the analysis to the end of the lease if it is
more than 10-years. A 10-year period has been used in the analysis of the
subject with the eleventh year stabilized NOI used to determine the reversion.
SELLING COSTS
Sales of similar size properties are typically accomplished with the aid of a
broker and will also incur legal and other transaction related cost. Based on
our survey of brokers and a review of institutional investor projections, an
allowance of 2.00% of the sale amount is applied.
DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW CONCLUSION
Discounting the annual cash flows and the equity reversion at the selected rate
of 10.50% indicates a value of $8,400,000. In this instance, the reversion
figure contributes
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH PAGE 32
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
approximately 45% of the total value. Investors surveyed for this assignment
indicated they would prefer to have the cash flow contribute anywhere from 50%
to 60%. Overall, the blend seems reasonable. The cash flow and pricing matrix
are located on the following pages.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH PAGE 33
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
HUNT CLUB
YEAR APR-2004 APR-2005 APR-2006 APR-2007 APR-2008 APR-2009
FISCAL YEAR 1 2 3 4 5 6
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REVENUE
Base Rent $1,552,800 $1,599,384 $1,647,366 $1,696,786 $1,747,690 $1,800,121
Vacancy $ 77,640 $ 79,969 $ 82,368 $ 84,839 $ 87,385 $ 90,006
Credit Loss $ 31,056 $ 31,988 $ 32,947 $ 33,936 $ 34,954 $ 36,002
Concessions $ 21,600 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal $ 130,296 $ 111,957 $ 115,316 $ 118,775 $ 122,338 $ 126,008
Laundry Income $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Garage Revenue $ 3,676 $ 3,786 $ 3,900 $ 4,017 $ 4,137 $ 4,262
Other Misc. Revenue $ 82,946 $ 85,434 $ 87,997 $ 90,637 $ 93,356 $ 96,157
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal Other Income $ 86,622 $ 89,221 $ 91,897 $ 94,654 $ 97,494 $ 100,419
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EFFECTIVE GROSS INCOME $1,509,126 $1,576,648 $1,623,947 $1,672,666 $1,722,846 $1,774,531
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Taxes $ 174,634 $ 179,873 $ 185,270 $ 190,828 $ 196,553 $ 202,449
Insurance $ 34,917 $ 35,965 $ 37,043 $ 38,155 $ 39,299 $ 40,478
Utilities $ 199,011 $ 204,982 $ 211,131 $ 217,465 $ 223,989 $ 230,709
Repair & Maintenance $ 53,759 $ 55,372 $ 57,033 $ 58,744 $ 60,506 $ 62,321
Cleaning $ 56,649 $ 58,348 $ 60,099 $ 61,902 $ 63,759 $ 65,672
Landscaping $ 38,328 $ 39,478 $ 40,663 $ 41,882 $ 43,139 $ 44,433
Security $ 4,897 $ 5,044 $ 5,195 $ 5,351 $ 5,511 $ 5,677
Marketing & Leasing $ 36,408 $ 37,501 $ 38,626 $ 39,784 $ 40,978 $ 42,207
General Administrative $ 170,467 $ 175,581 $ 180,849 $ 186,274 $ 191,862 $ 197,618
Management $ 75,456 $ 78,832 $ 81,197 $ 83,633 $ 86,142 $ 88,727
Miscellaneous $ 2,832 $ 2,917 $ 3,004 $ 3,095 $ 3,187 $ 3,283
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $ 847,359 $ 873,893 $ 900,109 $ 927,113 $ 954,926 $ 983,574
Reserves $ 40,000 $ 41,200 $ 42,436 $ 43,709 $ 45,020 $ 46,371
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET OPERATING INCOME $ 621,767 $ 661,555 $ 681,402 $ 701,844 $ 722,899 $ 744,586
Operating Expense Ratio (% of EGI) 56.1% 55.4% 55.4% 55.4% 55.4% 55.4%
Operating Expense Per Unit $ 4,237 $ 4,369 $ 4,501 $ 4,636 $ 4,775 $ 4,918
YEAR APR-2010 APR-2011 APR-2012 APR-2013 APR-2014
FISCAL YEAR 7 8 9 10 11
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REVENUE
Base Rent $1,854,124 $1,909,748 $1,967,041 $2,026,052 $2,086,833
Vacancy $ 92,706 $ 95,487 $ 98,352 $ 101,303 $ 104,342
Credit Loss $ 37,082 $ 38,195 $ 39,341 $ 40,521 $ 41,737
Concessions $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal $ 129,789 $ 133,682 $ 137,693 $ 141,824 $ 146,078
Laundry Income $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Garage Revenue $ 4,389 $ 4,521 $ 4,657 $ 4,796 $ 4,940
Other Misc. Revenue $ 99,042 $ 102,013 $ 105,073 $ 108,226 $ 111,472
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal Other Income $ 103,431 $ 106,534 $ 109,730 $ 113,022 $ 116,413
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EFFECTIVE GROSS INCOME $1,827,767 $1,882,600 $1,939,078 $1,997,250 $2,057,168
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Taxes $ 208,523 $ 214,778 $ 221,222 $ 227,858 $ 234,694
Insurance $ 41,693 $ 42,944 $ 44,232 $ 45,559 $ 46,926
Utilities $ 237,630 $ 244,759 $ 252,102 $ 259,665 $ 267,455
Repair & Maintenance $ 64,191 $ 66,117 $ 68,100 $ 70,143 $ 72,247
Cleaning $ 67,642 $ 69,671 $ 71,761 $ 73,914 $ 76,131
Landscaping $ 45,766 $ 47,139 $ 48,553 $ 50,010 $ 51,510
Security $ 5,847 $ 6,022 $ 6,203 $ 6,389 $ 6,581
Marketing & Leasing $ 43,474 $ 44,778 $ 46,121 $ 47,505 $ 48,930
General Administrative $ 203,547 $ 209,653 $ 215,943 $ 222,421 $ 229,093
Management $ 91,388 $ 94,130 $ 96,954 $ 99,863 $ 102,858
Miscellaneous $ 3,382 $ 3,483 $ 3,587 $ 3,695 $ 3,806
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $1,013,081 $1,043,473 $1,074,778 $1,107,021 $1,140,232
Reserves $ 47,762 $ 49,195 $ 50,671 $ 52,191 $ 53,757
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NET OPERATING INCOME $ 766,924 $ 789,931 $ 813,629 $ 838,038 $ 863,179
Operating Expense Ratio (% of EGI) 55.4% 55.4% 55.4% 55.4% 55.4%
Operating Expense Per Unit $ 5,065 $ 5,217 $ 5,374 $ 5,535 $ 5,701
Estimated Stabilized NOI $642,287 Sales Expense Rate 2.00%
Months to Stabilized 1 Discount Rate 10.50%
Stabilized Occupancy 95.0% Terminal Cap Rate 8.25%
Gross Residual Sale Price $10,462,781 Deferred Maintenance $ 0
Less: Sales Expense $ 209,256 Add: Excess Land $ 0
-----------
Net Residual Sale Price $10,253,525 Other Adjustments $ 0
----------
PV of Reversion $ 3,777,900 Value Indicated By "DCF" $8,370,467
Add: NPV of NOI $ 4,592,568 Rounded $8,400,000
-----------
PV Total $ 8,370,467
"DCF" VALUE SENSITIVITY TABLE
DISCOUNT RATE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL VALUE 10.00% 10.25% 10.50% 10.75% 11.00%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7.75% $8,913,442 $8,762,138 $8,614,203 $8,469,550 $8,328,097
8.00% $8,781,935 $8,633,583 $8,488,527 $8,346,682 $8,207,968
TERMINAL CAP RATE 8.25% $8,658,398 $8,512,819 $8,370,467 $8,231,261 $8,095,120
8.50% $8,542,128 $8,399,159 $8,259,352 $8,122,629 $7,988,910
8.75% $8,432,502 $8,291,993 $8,154,587 $8,020,205 $7,888,770
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH PAGE 34
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
INCOME LOSS DURING LEASE-UP
The subject is currently near or at a stabilized condition. Therefore, there is
no income loss during lease-up at the subject property.
CONCESSIONS
Due to softness in the market, concessions have been utilized at the subject
property and within the market. Based on our discussions with the subject's
property manager and those at competing properties, these concessions are
expected to continue in the near term until the market returns to a stabilized
level. Concessions have been included as a line item deduction within the
discounted cash flow analysis. The present value of these concessions equates to
$20,000 (rounded). This amount has been deducted from the Direct Capitalization
analysis, as well as the Sales Comparison Approach value.
DIRECT CAPITALIZATION METHOD
After having projected the income and expenses for the property, the next step
in the valuation process is to capitalize the net income into an estimate of
value. The selected overall capitalization rate ("OAR") covers both return on
and return of capital. It is the overall rate of return an investor expects.
After considering the market transactions and the investor surveys, we
previously conclude that an overall rate of 7.75% percent is applicable to the
subject. The results of our direct capitalization analysis are as follows:
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH PAGE 35
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
HUNT CLUB
TOTAL PER SQ. FT. PER UNIT % OF EGI
----- ----------- -------- --------
REVENUE
Base Rent $1,552,800 $ 7.65 $ 7,764
Less: Vacancy & Collection Loss 7.00% $ 108,696 $ 0.54 $ 543
Plus: Other Income
Laundry Income $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0 0.00%
Garage Revenue $ 3,676 $ 0.02 $ 18 0.24%
Other Misc. Revenue $ 82,946 $ 0.41 $ 415 5.42%
---------------------------------------------------
Subtotal Other Income $ 86,622 $ 0.43 $ 433 5.66%
EFFECTIVE GROSS INCOME $1,530,726 $ 7.55 $ 7,654
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Taxes $ 174,634 $ 0.86 $ 873 11.41%
Insurance $ 34,917 $ 0.17 $ 175 2.28%
Utilities $ 199,011 $ 0.98 $ 995 13.00%
Repair & Maintenance $ 53,759 $ 0.27 $ 269 3.51%
Cleaning $ 56,649 $ 0.28 $ 283 3.70%
Landscaping $ 38,328 $ 0.19 $ 192 2.50%
Security $ 4,897 $ 0.02 $ 24 0.32%
Marketing & Leasing $ 36,408 $ 0.18 $ 182 2.38%
General Administrative $ 170,467 $ 0.84 $ 852 11.14%
Management 5.00% $ 76,536 $ 0.38 $ 383 5.00%
Miscellaneous $ 2,832 $ 0.01 $ 14 0.19%
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $ 848,439 $ 4.18 $ 4,242 55.43%
Reserves $ 40,000 $ 0.20 $ 200 2.61%
---------------------------------------------------
NET OPERATING INCOME $ 642,287 $ 3.17 $ 3,211 41.96%
"GOING IN" CAPITALIZATION RATE 7.75%
VALUE INDICATION $8,287,568 $40.86 $41,438
PV OF CONCESSIONS ($ 20,000)
"AS IS" VALUE INDICATION
(DIRECT CAPITALIZATION APPROACH) $8,267,568
ROUNDED $8,300,000 $40.92 $41,500
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH PAGE 36
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
DIRECT CAPITALIZATION VALUE SENSITIVITY TABLE
CAP RATE VALUE ROUNDED $/UNIT $/SF
- -------- ---------- ---------- ------- ------
7.00% $9,155,522 $9,200,000 $46,000 $45.35
7.25% $8,839,125 $8,800,000 $44,000 $43.38
7.50% $8,543,821 $8,500,000 $42,500 $41.90
7.75% $8,267,568 $8,300,000 $41,500 $40.92
8.00% $8,008,582 $8,000,000 $40,000 $39.44
8.25% $7,765,291 $7,800,000 $39,000 $38.45
8.50% $7,536,312 $7,500,000 $37,500 $36.97
CONCLUSION BY THE DIRECT CAPITALIZATION METHOD
Applying the capitalization rate to our estimated NOI results in an estimated
value of $8,300,000.
CORRELATION AND CONCLUSION BY THE INCOME APPROACH
The two methods used to estimate the market value of the subject property by the
income approach resulted in the following indications of value:
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis $8,400,000
Direct Capitalization Method $8,300,000
Giving consideration to the indicated values provided by both techniques, we
have concluded the estimated value by the income capitalization approach to be
$8,400,000.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. RECONCILIATION AND CONCLUSION PAGE 37
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
RECONCILIATION AND CONCLUSION
This appraisal was made to express an opinion as of the Market Value of the fee
simple estate in the property.
AS IS MARKET VALUE OF THE FEE SIMPLE ESTATE
Cost Approach Not Utilized
Sales Comparison Approach $8,400,000
Income Approach $8,400,000
Reconciled Value $8,400,000
The Income Capitalization Method is considered a reliable indicator of value.
Income and expenses were estimated and projected based on historical operating
statements and market oriented expenses. This method is primarily used by
investors in their underwriting analysis. Furthermore, there was good support
for an overall rate in the Direct Capitalization Method.
The Sales Comparison Approach to value supported the value conclusion by the
Income Approach and was given secondary consideration. Investment-grade,
income-producing properties such as the subject are not typically traded based
on cost. Therefore, the Cost Approach has not been considered in our valuation.
FINAL VALUE - FEE SIMPLE ESTATE
Based on the investigation and premise outlined, it is our opinion that as of
May 8, 2003 the market value of the fee simple estate in the property is:
$8,400,000
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. ADDENDA
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
ADDENDA
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT A
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
EXHIBIT A
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT A
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS
[PICTURE] [PICTURE]
EXTERIOR - APARTMENT BUILDING EXTERIOR - FRONTAGE
[PICTURE] [PICTURE]
EXTERIOR - APARTMENT BUILDING EXTERIOR - APARTMENT BUILDING
[PICTURE] [PICTURE]
INTERIOR - CLUBHOUSE INTERIOR - LIVING ROOM
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT A
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS
[PICTURE] [PICTURE]
INTERIOR - KITCHEN INTERIOR - BATHROOM
[PICTURE] [PICTURE]
INTERIOR - CLOSET INTERIOR - COMMON HALLWAY
[PICTURE] [PICTURE]
EXTERIOR - POOL EXTERIOR - CARPORT
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT B
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
EXHIBIT B
SUMMARY OF RENT COMPARABLES
AND PHOTOGRAPH OF COMPARABLES
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT B
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
PHOTOGRAPHS OF COMPARABLE SALE PROPERTIES
COMPARABLE I-1 COMPARABLE I-2 COMPARABLE I-3
CARRIAGETREE APARTMENTS ARBOR GREEN APARTMENTS ARBOR GREEN APARTMENTS
(MONON PLACE APTS.) 3836 Arbor Green Lane 3836 Arbor Green Lane
5900 Carvel Ave. Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, IN
Indianapolis, IN
[PICTURE] [PICTURE] [PICTURE]
COMPARABLE I-4 COMPARABLE I-5
HAWTHORN HEIGHTS WILLOWS AT CASTLETON
4850 E. 62nd 5850 Laketon Dr
Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, IN
[PICTURE] [PICTURE]
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT B
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE RENTAL PROPERTIES
COMPARABLE
DESCRIPTION SUBJECT R - 1
- ------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Property Name Hunt Club Cottages at Fall Creek
Management Company AIMCO
LOCATION:
Address 5421 Calder Way 5653 Brendon Way West Dr
City, State Indianapolis, Indian Indianapolis, IN
County Marion Marion
Proximity to Subject 0.5 miles NW of the subject
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS:
Net Rentable Area (SF) 202,848
Year Built 1973 1970
Effective Age 25 30
Building Structure Type Wood, w/ brick & siding facade; asphal Wood, w/ brick & siding facade; asphalt
shingle roof shingle roof
Parking Type (Gr., Cov., etc.) Garage, Open Covered
Number of Units 200 770
Unit Mix: Type Unit Qty. Mo. Rent Type Unit Qty. Mo.
1 1Br/1Ba 800 56 $ 549 1 1BD/1BH-Type 1 644 0 $ 545
2 2Br/2Ba 1,052 72 $ 619 1 1BD/1BH-Type 1 682 68 $ 556
3 2Br/2Ba 1,072 32 $ 639 1 2BD/1BH-Type 1 810 52 $ 622
4 2Br/2Ba 1,200 40 $ 689 3 2BD/2BH-Type 1 1,120 0 $ 779
2 2BD/2BH-Type 1 1,056 0 $ 669
4 3BD/2BH-Type 1 1,700 0 $1,100
Average Unit Size (SF) 1,014 737
Unit Breakdown: Efficiency 0% 2-Bedroom 39% Efficiency 0% 2-Bedroom 0%
1-Bedroom 61% 3-Bedroom 0% 1-Bedroom 0% 3-Bedroom 0%
CONDITION: Good Good
APPEAL: Average Very Good
AMENITIES:
Unit Amenities Attach. Garage Vaulted Ceiling Attach. Garage X Vaulted Ceiling
X Balcony X W/D Connect. X Balcony X W/D Connect.
Fireplace X Fireplace
X Cable TV Ready X Cable TV Ready
Project Amenities X Swimming Pool X Swimming Pool
X Spa/Jacuzzi Car Wash Spa/Jacuzzi Car Wash
Basketball Court X BBQ Equipment X Basketball Court X BBQ Equipment
Volleyball Court Theater Room X Volleyball Court Theater Room
Sand Volley Ball X Meeting Hall Sand Volley Ball X Meeting Hall
Tennis Court X Secured Parking X Tennis Court X Secured Parking
Racquet Ball X Laundry Room X Racquet Ball X Laundry Room
Jogging Track Business Office Jogging Track X Business Office
X Gym Room X Gym Room
OCCUPANCY: 93% 92%
LEASING DATA:
Available Leasing Terms 6 to 15 months 8 to 12 months
Concessions 1 - 1 1/2 Months Free $500 up-front discount
Pet Deposit $300-$500 $300
Utilities Paid by Tenant: X Electric X Natural Gas X Electric X Natural Gas
X Water Trash Water Trash
Confirmation
Telephone Number
NOTES: None
COMPARISON TO SUBJECT: Slightly Superior
COMPARABLE COMPARABLE
DESCRIPTION R - 2 R - 3
- ------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Property Name Salem Courthouse The Orchard
Management Company
LOCATION:
Address 7007 Courthouse Dr. 5350 Cider Mill Lane
City, State Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, IN
County Marion Marion
Proximity to Subject 0.5 miles north of the subject 0.25 miles east of the subject
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS:
Net Rentable Area (SF) 392,800 303,430
Year Built 1979 1973
Effective Age 5 25
Building Structure Type Wood, w/ brick & siding facade; asphalt Wood, w/ brick & siding facade; asphalt
shingle roof shingle roof
Parking Type (Gr., Cov., etc.) Open, Covered Open, Covered
Number of Units 388 378
Unit Mix: Type Unit Qty. Mo. Type Unit Qty. Mo.
0 Studio 550 40 $ 409 1 1BD/1BH - Type 1 670 95 $ 534
1 1BD/1BH - Type 1 656 104 $ 505 1 1BD/1BH - Type 2 712 95 $ 581
1 1BD/1BH - Type 1 802 44 $ 525 1 2BD/1BH 852 95 $ 634
1 1BD/1BH - Type 1 756 48 $ 545 2 2BD/2BH 960 95 $ 681
2 2BD/1BH 933 88 $ 585
2 2BD/2BH 929 64 $ 620
Average Unit Size (SF) 782 799
Unit Breakdown: Efficiency 16% 2-Bedroom 39% Efficiency 0% 2-Bedroom 50%
1-Bedroom 51% 3-Bedroom 0% 1-Bedroom 50% 3-Bedroom 0%
CONDITION: Good Good
APPEAL: Good Good
AMENITIES:
Unit Amenities X Attach. Garage X Vaulted Ceiling Attach. Garage X Vaulted Ceiling
X Balcony X W/D Connect. X Balcony W/D Connect.
X Fireplace Fireplace
X Cable TV Ready X Cable TV Ready
Project Amenities X Swimming Pool X Swimming Pool
Spa/Jacuzzi X Car Wash Spa/Jacuzzi Car Wash
X Basketball Court X BBQ Equipment Basketball Court X BBQ Equipment
Volleyball Court Theater Room X Volleyball Court Theater Room
X Sand Volley Ball X Meeting Hall X Sand Volley Ball X Meeting Hall
X Tennis Court Secured Parking X Tennis Court Secured Parking
Racquet Ball X Laundry Room Racquet Ball X Laundry Room
X Jogging Track X Business Office Jogging Track X Business Office
X Gym Room X Gym Room
OCCUPANCY: 73% 95%
LEASING DATA:
Available Leasing Terms 6 to 12 months 6 to 12 months
Concessions None
Pet Deposit $150 $150
Utilities Paid by Tenant: X Electric X Natural Gas X Electric Natural Gas
Water Trash X Water Trash
Confirmation
Telephone Number
NOTES: None
COMPARISON TO SUBJECT: Slightly Superior Slightly Superior
COMPARABLE COMPARABLE
DESCRIPTION R - 4 R - 5
- ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Property Name Churchill Ranch Lake Castleton
Management Company
LOCATION:
Address 8016 Louisville Dr. 7601 Carlton Arms Dr.
City, State Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, IN
County Marion Marion
Proximity to Subject Within 5-mile radius 2.5 miles N of subject
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS:
Net Rentable Area (SF) 147,780 1,357,242
Year Built 1973 1980
Effective Age 25 20
Building Structure Type Wood, w/ brick & siding facade; asphalt Wood, w/ brick & siding facade; asphalt
shingle roof shingle roof
Parking Type (Gr., Cov., etc.) Garage, Open, Covered Open, Covered
Number of Units 134 1,256
Unit Mix: Type Unit Qty. Mo. Type Unit Qty. Mo.
2 2BD/2BH - Type 1 930 74 $ 570 1 1BD/1BH 765 210 $ 665
3 3BD/2BH 1,190 32 $ 695 1 1BD/1BH 881 211 $ 890
4 4BD/3BH 1,460 28 $ 775 2 2BD/1BH 944 211 $ 745
3 2BD/2BH 1,065 211 $ 810
4 3BD/2BH 1,291 422 $ 975
Average Unit Size (SF) 1,103 1,040
Unit Breakdown: Efficiency 0% 2-Bedroom 55% Efficiency 0% 2-Bedroom 34%
1-Bedroom 0% 3-Bedroom 45% 1-Bedroom 33% 3-Bedroom 33%
CONDITION: Good Good
APPEAL: Good Good
AMENITIES:
Unit Amenities X Attach. Garage Vaulted Ceiling Attach. Garage Vaulted Ceiling
X Balcony X W/D Connect. X Balcony W/D Connect.
Fireplace Fireplace
X Cable TV Ready X Cable TV Ready
Project Amenities X Swimming Pool X Swimming Pool
Spa/Jacuzzi Car Wash Spa/Jacuzzi Car Wash
Basketball Court X BBQ Equipment Basketball Court X BBQ Equipment
Volleyball Court X Theater Room Volleyball Court Theater Room
Sand Volley Ball X Meeting Hall Sand Volley Ball X Meeting Hall
Tennis Court X Secured Parking X Tennis Court Secured Parking
Racquet Ball X Laundry Room Racquet Ball X Laundry Room
Jogging Track X Business Office Jogging Track X Business Office
X Gym Room Gym Room
OCCUPANCY: 91% 92%
LEASING DATA:
Available Leasing Terms 6 to 12 months 6 to 12 months
Concessions
Pet Deposit $150
Utilities Paid by Tenant: X Electric X Natural Gas X Electric X Natural Gas
Water Trash Water Trash
Confirmation
Telephone Number
NOTES: None None
COMPARISON TO SUBJECT: Superior Similar
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT B
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
PHOTOGRAPHS OF COMPARABLE RENT PROPERTIES
COMPARABLE R-1 COMPARABLE R-2 COMPARABLE R-3
COTTAGES AT FALL CREEK SALEM COURTHOUSE THE ORCHARD
5653 Brendon Way West Dr. 7007 Courthouse Dr. 5350 Cider Mill Lane
Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, IN
[PICTURE] [PICTURE] [PICTURE]
COMPARABLE R-4 COMPARABLE R-5
CHURCHILL RANCH LAKE CASTLETON
8016 Louisville Dr. 7601 Carlton Arms Dr.
Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, IN
[PICTURE] [PICTURE]
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT C
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
EXHIBIT C
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
(3 PAGES)
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT C
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in nature. No investigation has
been made of the title to or any liabilities against the property appraised. In
this appraisal, it is presumed that, unless otherwise noted, the owner's claim
is valid, the property rights are good and marketable, and there are no
encumbrances which cannot be cleared through normal processes.
To the best of our knowledge, all data set forth in this report are true and
accurate. Although gathered from reliable sources, no guarantee is made nor
liability assumed for the accuracy of any data, opinions, or estimates
identified as being furnished by others which have been used in formulating this
analysis.
Land areas and descriptions used in this appraisal were obtained from public
records and have not been verified by legal counsel or a licensed surveyor.
No soil analysis or geological studies were ordered or made in conjunction with
this report, nor were any water, oil, gas, or other subsurface mineral and use
rights or conditions investigated.
Substances such as asbestos, urea-formaldehyde foam insulation, other chemicals,
toxic wastes, or other potentially hazardous materials could, if present,
adversely affect the value of the property. Unless otherwise stated in this
report, the existence of hazardous substance, which may or may not be present on
or in the property, was not considered by the appraiser in the development of
the conclusion of value. The stated value estimate is predicated on the
assumption that there is no material on or in the property that would cause such
a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, and the
client has been advised that the appraiser is not qualified to detect such
substances, quantify the impact on values, or develop the remedial cost.
No environmental impact study has been ordered or made. Full compliance with
applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws is
assumed unless otherwise stated, defined, and considered in the report. It is
also assumed that all required licenses, consents, or other legislative or
administrative authority from any local, state, or national government or
private entity organization either have been or can be obtained or renewed for
any use which the report covers.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT C
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions
have been complied with unless a nonconformity has been stated, defined, and
considered in the appraisal report. Further, it is assumed that the utilization
of the land and improvements is within the boundaries of the property described
and that no encroachment or trespass exists unless noted in the report.
The Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") became effective January 26, 1992.
We have not made a specific compliance survey and analysis of this property to
determine whether or not it is in conformity with the various detailed
requirements of the ADA. It is possible that a compliance survey of the property
together with a detailed analysis of the requirements of the ADA could reveal
that the property is not in compliance with one or more of the requirements of
the act. If so, this fact could have a negative effect on the value of the
property. Since we have no direct evidence relating to this issue, we did not
consider the possible noncompliance with the requirements of ADA in estimating
the value of the property.
We have made a physical inspection of the property and noted visible physical
defects, if any, in our report. This inspection was made by individuals
generally familiar with real estate and building construction. However, these
individuals are not architectural or structural engineers who would have
detailed knowledge of building design and structural integrity. Accordingly, we
do not opine on, nor are we responsible for, the structural integrity of the
property including its conformity to specific governmental code requirements,
such as fire, building and safety, earthquake, and occupancy, or any physical
defects which were not readily apparent to the appraiser during the inspection.
The value or values presented in this report are based upon the premises
outlined herein and are valid only for the purpose or purposes stated.
The date of value to which the conclusions and opinions expressed apply is set
forth in this report. The value opinion herein rendered is based on the status
of the national business economy and the purchasing power of the U.S. dollar as
of that date.
Testimony or attendance in court or at any other hearing is not required by
reason of this appraisal unless arrangements are previously made within a
reasonable time in advance for
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT C
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
such testimony, and then such testimony shall be at American Appraisal
Associates, Inc.'s, prevailing per diem for the individuals involved.
Possession of this report or any copy thereof does not carry with it the right
of publication. No portion of this report (especially any conclusion to use, the
identity of the appraiser or the firm with which the appraiser is connected, or
any reference to the Appraisal Institute or the designations awarded by this
organization) shall be disseminated to the public through prospectus,
advertising, public relations, news, or any other means of communication without
the written consent and approval of American Appraisal Associates, Inc.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT D
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
EXHIBIT D
CERTIFICATE OF APPRAISER
(1 PAGE)
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT D
CERTIFICATE OF APPRAISER
I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct.
The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by
the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and represent the
unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions of American
Appraisal Associates, Inc.
American Appraisal Associates, Inc. and I personally, have no present
or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this
report and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the
parties involved.
Compensation for American Appraisal Associates, Inc. is not contingent
on an action or event resulting from the analyses, opinions, or
conclusions in, or the use of, this report.
The analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report
has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice and the Code of
Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Practice of the
Appraisal Institute.
The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal
` Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives.
I personally did not inspect the subject property. John Nolan provided
significant real property appraisal assistance in the preparation of
this report.
I am currently in compliance with the Appraisal Institute's continuing
education requirements.
-s- Kenneth W. Kapecki
----------------------
Ken Kapecki, MAI
Managing Principal, Real Estate Group
State of Indiana, Certified General Appraiser,
#CG49600008
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT E
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
EXHIBIT E
QUALIFICATIONS OF APPRAISER
(3 PAGES)
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT E
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
KENNETH W. KAPECKI, MAI
MANAGING PRINCIPAL, REAL ESTATE GROUP
POSITION Kenneth W. Kapecki is the Managing Principal for the Chicago
Real Estate Group of American Appraisal Associates, Inc.
("AAA").
EXPERIENCE
Valuation Mr. Kapecki has over 17 years of experience in providing
valuation services to clients worldwide. He has a diversified
background with considerable expertise in the valuation of
special-purpose properties, large multilocational holdings,
and investment-grade real estate. He has appraised steel
mills, chemical plants, food processing facilities, airports,
mines, railroad rights-of-way, hotels, and a variety of
commercial and manufacturing facilities.
Mr. Kapecki's experience further extends to highest and best
use studies, feasibility studies, lease valuation analyses,
cost segregation analyses, and insurable value analyses. His
reports are most frequently prepared for acquisition, ad
valorem tax, divestiture, financing, allocation of purchase
price, litigation support, and value reporting. Over the
years, he has completed appraisals in 50 states representing
over $10 billion in value.
Mr. Kapecki has developed a core competency in the valuation
of hospitality property. He has appraised more than 150 hotels
in the last two years alone for financing, acquisition due
diligence, cost segregation, and feasibility. These properties
consisted of a mixture of limited-service, full-service, and
resort hotels located throughout the United States as well as
in the Bahamas, Belize, and Guam.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT E
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
Court Mr. Kapecki has testified as an expert witness in state
and federal district courts and by deposition
statements and interrogatory communications.
Business Prior to joining AAA in 2001, Mr. Kapecki was a senior
manager in the Chicago Valuation Service Group of
Arthur Andersen, where he served as the central
regional team leader for real estate staff training,
hospitality consulting, and the valuation of real
estate. Prior to his employment with Arthur Andersen,
Mr. Kapecki served as the manager of real estate
valuations for Lloyd-Thomas Coats and Burchard Co.
EDUCATION University of Wisconsin - La Crosse
Bachelor of Science - Geography
STATE CERTIFICATIONS State of Illinois, Certified General Real Estate
Appraiser, #153000331
State of Indiana, Certified General Appraiser,
#CG49600008
State of Michigan, Certified General Appraiser,
#1201003145
State of Wisconsin, Certified General Appraiser and
Licensed
Appraiser, #641
PROFESSIONAL Appraisal Institute, MAI Designated Member Chicago
AFFILIATIONS Chapter, Admissions Committee Member, 1997 - Present
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT E
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
VALUATION AND Appraisal Institute
SPECIAL COURSES Appraisal Principles
Case Studies in Real Estate Valuation
Fair Lending and the Appraiser
Highest & Best Use and Market Analysis
Income Capitalization, Parts A and B
Litigation Support: The Appraiser as an Expert Witness
Partial Interest Valuation
Real Estate Disclosure
Report Writing
Standards of Professional Practice
Valuation of Detrimental Conditions
Valuation Theory and Techniques
Arthur Andersen, Course Developer
Income Capitalization Theory and Techniques
Introduction to the Cost Approach
Property Inspection and Market Data Collection
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
GENERAL SERVICE CONDITIONS
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
HUNT CLUB, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
GENERAL SERVICE CONDITIONS
The services(s) provided by AAA will be performed in accordance with
professional appraisal standards. Our compensation is not contingent in any way
upon our conclusions of value. We assume, without independent verification, the
accuracy of all data provided to us. We will act as an independent contractor
and reserve the right to use subcontractors. All files, workpapers or documents
developed by us during the course of the engagement will be our property. We
will retain this data for at least five years.
Our report is to be used only for the specific purpose stated herein; and any
other use is invalid. No reliance may be made by any third party without our
prior written consent. You may show our report in its entirety to those third
parties who need to review the information contained herein. No one should rely
on our report as a substitute for their own due diligence. We understand that
our reports will be described in public tender offer documents distributed to
limited partners. We reserve the right to review the public tender offer
documents prior to their issuance to confirm that disclosures of facts from the
current appraisals are accurate. No reference to our name or our report, in
whole or in part, in any other SEC filing or private placement memorandum you
prepare and/or distribute to third parties may be made without our prior written
consent.
The Tender Offer Partnerships, as that term is defined in the Settlement
Agreement, agree to indemnify and hold us harmless against and from any and all
losses, claims, actions, damages, expenses or liabilities, including reasonable
attorneys' fees, to which we may become subject in connection with this
engagement except where such losses, claims, actions, damages, expenses or
liabilities, including reasonable attorney's fees, arise or result from AAA's
misconduct, bad faith or negligence. Co-Clients will not be liable for any of
our acts or omissions.
AAA is an equal opportunity employer.