FORM 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.

(Mark One)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 (FEE REQUIRED)
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995
OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)
For the transition period from to
---------- -----------

Commission file number: 0-11911

CABLE TV FUND 11-B, LTD.
------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Colorado 84-0908730
- --------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------

(State of Organization) (IRS Employer Identification No.)

P.O. Box 3309, Englewood, Colorado 80155-3309 (303) 792-3111
- --------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
(Address of principal executive office and Zip Code) (Registrant's telephone no.
including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Limited
Partnership Interests

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants, (1) have filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days:

Yes x No
----- -----

Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant: N/A

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None
2
PART I.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

THE PARTNERSHIP. Cable TV Fund 11-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") is a Colorado
limited partnership that was formed pursuant to the public offering of limited
partnership interests in the Cable TV Fund 11 Limited Partnership Program (the
"Program"), which was sponsored by Jones Intercable, Inc. (the "General
Partner"). Cable TV Fund 11-A, Ltd. ("Fund 11-A"), Cable TV Fund 11-C, Ltd.
("Fund 11-C") and Cable TV Fund 11-D, Ltd. ("Fund 11-D") are the other
partnerships that were formed pursuant to the Program. The Partnership, Fund
11-A, Fund 11-C and Fund 11-D formed a general partnership known as Cable TV
Joint Fund 11 (the "Venture") in which the Partnership owns an 8 percent
interest, Fund 11-A owns an 18 percent interest, Fund 11-C owns a 27 percent
interest and Fund 11-D owns a 47 percent interest. The Partnership and the
Venture were formed for the purpose of acquiring and operating cable television
systems.

The Partnership directly owns cable television systems serving the
communities of Lancaster, Lockport and Orchard Park, New York (the "New York
System"), and the Venture operates a cable television system in Manitowoc,
Wisconsin (the "Manitowoc System"). See Item 2. The New York System and the
Manitowoc System may collectively hereinafter be referred to as the "Systems."

PROPOSED DISPOSITIONS OF CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEMS. On October 6, 1995, the
Partnership entered into an asset purchase agreement pursuant to which it agreed
to sell the New York System to Global Acquisition Partners, L.P., an
unaffiliated cable television system operator, for a sales price of $84,000,000
in cash, subject to normal working capital closing adjustments. The closing of
the sale of the New York System is subject to a number of conditions, including
approval of the transaction by the holders of a majority of the Partnership's
limited partnership interests, which has been obtained, and the consent of the
state and local franchising authorities to the transfer of the New York System's
franchises, the approval of the Federal Communications Commission to the
transfer of certain licenses and the consent of third parties with whom the
Partnership has real property leases to the transfer thereof. The New York state
cable authority has conditionally approved the sale of the New York System by
the Partnership. Approvals of certain of the local franchising authorities to
the transfer of certain of the New York System's franchises have been obtained.
The remaining local government approvals are pending, and the General Partner
expects that all such approvals will be obtained before the end of March 1996.
The approvals of the Federal Communications Commission to the transfer of
certain of the New York System's franchises also are pending and are expected to
be received in the near future. Closing of this sale is expected to occur on or
about April 1, 1996.

Upon consummation of the proposed sale of the New York System, working
capital closing adjustments will be determined, the Partnership will pay all of
its indebtedness, which totaled approximately $23,808,000 at December 31, 1995,
its sales tax liability of approximately $1,750,000 and a brokerage fee of
$2,100,000 to The Jones Group, Ltd., a subsidiary of the General Partner, and
then the Partnership will distribute the approximate $56,047,500 net proceeds to
its partners of record as of February 29, 1996. Because limited partners have
already received distributions in an amount equal to 100 percent of the capital
initially contributed to the Partnership by the limited partners, the net
proceeds from the New York System's sale will be distributed 75 percent to the
limited partners and 25 percent to the General Partner. Based upon the pro forma
financial information as of December 31, 1995, as a result of the New York
System's sale, the limited partners of the Partnership, as a group, will receive
approximately $42,035,600 and the General Partner will receive approximately
$14,011,900. Limited partners will receive $1,105 for each $500 limited
partnership interest, or $2,211 for each $1,000 invested in the Partnership,
from the net proceeds of the New York System's sale. Once the distribution of
the net proceeds from the sale of the New York System has been made, limited
partners will have received a total of $1,605 for each $500 limited partnership
interest, or $3,211 for each $1,000 invested in the Partnership, taking into
account distributions to limited partners made in July 1990 and July 1992. The
Partnership will continue to own its 8 percent interest in the Venture until the
Manitowoc System also is sold, as discussed below. Upon the closing of the sale
of the Partnership's New York System and the Venture's Manitowoc System, the
Partnership will be liquidated and dissolved.

2
3
On September 5, 1995, the Venture entered into an asset purchase agreement
pursuant to which it agreed to sell the Manitowoc System to the General Partner
for a sales price of $15,735,667, subject to normal working capital closing
adjustments. This sales price represents the average of three separate
independent appraisals of the fair market value of the Manitowoc System obtained
by the General Partner, and it was the only bid tendered in a public bidding
process for the Manitowoc System. The General Partner has assigned its rights
and obligations under the asset purchase agreement to Jones Cable Holdings, Inc.
("JCH"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the General Partner. The sale of the
Manitowoc System is subject to a number of conditions, including approval of
the transaction by the holders of a majority of the limited partnership
interests in each of the four partnerships that comprise the Venture and
approvals from governmental authorities and other third parties necessary to
the transfer of the Manitowoc System. If all conditions precedent to JCH's
obligation to close are not eventually satisfied or waived, JCH's obligation
to purchase the Manitowoc System will terminate on September 30, 1996.

In order to sell the Manitowoc System, the Venture must obtain the consent
of the City of Manitowoc and third parties with whom the Venture has contracts
related to the Manitowoc System, such as pole attachment agreements or other
service agreements, to the transfer thereof. The Venture was unsuccessful in its
efforts to sell the Manitowoc System in June 1990, at the time of the Venture's
sale of its remaining Wisconsin cable television systems, due to the refusal of
the City of Manitowoc to consent to the transfer of the system's franchise.
Negotiations with the City of Manitowoc with respect to the renewal and transfer
of the Manitowoc System's franchise are continuing, and the Manitowoc System
currently is being operated pursuant to a temporary extension of the franchise's
term. The General Partner hopes that the City ultimately will agree to the
renewal and transfer of the franchise and that the City will not take any action
that will prevent the closing of the sale of the Manitowoc System, but given
the current status of the Venture's negotiations with the City there can be no
assurance that the sale will occur as planned.

The General Partner intends to conduct votes of the limited partners of
each of the four partnerships that comprise the Venture to seek their approval
of the Manitowoc System's sale. Because the limited partners of each of the
four partnerships that comprise the Venture previously approved the sale of
the Manitowoc System in 1990 only to have such sale frustrated by the refusal
by the City of Manitowoc to consent to the transfer of the Manitowoc System's
franchise, the General Partner believes it prudent to conduct the votes of the
limited partners only after the City of Manitowoc consents to the transfer of
the franchise. As discussed above, there can be no assurance that the City
will consent to the transfer of the Manitowoc System's franchise.

If the proposed sale of the Manitowoc System is closed, the Venture will
pay all of its indebtedness, which totaled $55,175 at December 31, 1995,
including the $45,258 owed to the General Partner, and then the net sale
proceeds and the Venture's cash on hand, which total $18,420,800, will be
distributed to the four constituent partnerships of the Venture in proportion to
their ownership interests in the Venture. The Partnership accordingly will
receive 8 percent of such proceeds, estimated to total approximately $1,432,700.
Because limited partners will have already received distributions in an amount
in excess of the capital initially contributed to the Partnership by the limited
partners, the Partnership's portion of the net proceeds from the Manitowoc
System's sale will be distributed 75 percent to the limited partners and 25
percent to the General Partner. Based upon pro forma financial information as of
December 31, 1995, as a result of the Manitowoc System's sale, the limited
partners of the Partnership, as a group, will receive approximately $1,074,500
and the General Partner will receive approximately $358,200. Limited partners
will receive $28 for each $500 limited partnership interest, or $57 for each
$1,000 invested in the Partnership, from the Partnership's portion of the net
proceeds of the Manitowoc System's sale. Once the Partnership has completed the
distribution of its portion of the net proceeds from the sale of the Manitowoc
System, limited partners of the Partnership will have received a total of $1,634
for each $500 limited partnership interest, or $3,267 for each $1,000 invested
in the Partnership, taking into account the prior distributions to limited
partners made in 1990 and 1992, and the distribution to be made on the

3
4
sale of the Partnership's New York System in May 1996. After the Partnership
distributes its portion of the proceeds from the sale of the Manitowoc System to
its partners, the Partnership will be dissolved and liquidated.

Although it previously was announced that the General Partner intended to
acquire and then transfer the Manitowoc System to Time Warner Entertainment
Company, L.P. ("Time Warner") as part of a larger exchange of cable television
systems between the General Partner and Time Warner, the General Partner and
Time Warner have agreed to exclude the Manitowoc System from that exchange.

CABLE TELEVISION SERVICES. The Systems offer to their subscribers various
types of programming, which include basic service, tier service, premium
service, pay-per-view programs and packages including several of these services
at combined rates.

Basic cable television service usually consists of signals of all four
national television networks, various independent and educational television
stations (both VHF and UHF) and certain signals received from satellites. Basic
service also usually includes programs originated locally by the system, which
may consist of music, news, weather reports, stock market and financial
information and live or videotaped programs of a public service or entertainment
nature. FM radio signals are also frequently distributed to subscribers as part
of the basic service.

The Systems offer tier services on an optional basis to their subscribers.
A tier generally includes most of the cable networks such as Entertainment and
Sports Programming Network (ESPN), Cable News Network (CNN), Turner Network
Television (TNT), Family Channel, Discovery and others, and the cable television
operators buy tier programming from these networks. The Systems also offer a
package that includes the basic service channels and the tier services.

The Systems also offer premium services to their subscribers, which consist
of feature films, sporting events and other special features that are presented
without commercial interruption. The cable television operators buy premium
programming from suppliers such as HBO, Showtime, Cinemax or others at a cost
based on the number of subscribers the cable operator serves. Premium service
programming usually is significantly more expensive than the basic service or
tier service programming, and consequently cable operators price premium service
separately when sold to subscribers.

The Systems also offer to subscribers pay-per-view programming.
Pay-per-view is a service that allows subscribers to receive single programs,
frequently consisting of motion pictures that have recently completed their
theatrical exhibitions and major sporting events, and to pay for such service on
a program-by-program basis.

REVENUES. Monthly service fees for basic, tier and premium services
constitute the major source of revenue for the Systems. At December 31, 1995,
the Systems' monthly basic service rates ranged from $5.00 to $11.08, monthly
basic and tier ("basic plus") service rates ranged from $18.76 to $23.45, and
monthly premium services ranged from $3.95 to $12.95 per premium service. In
addition, the Partnership and the Venture earn revenues from the Systems'
pay-per-view programs and advertising fees. Related charges may include a
nonrecurring installation fee that ranges from $4.89 to $35.00; however, from
time to time the Systems have followed the common industry practice of reducing
or waiving the installation fee during promotional periods. Commercial
subscribers such as hotels, motels and hospitals are charged a nonrecurring
connection fee that usually covers the cost of installation. Except under the
terms of certain contracts with commercial subscribers and residential apartment
and condominium complexes, the subscribers are free to discontinue the service
at any time without penalty. For the year ended December 31, 1995, of the total
fees received by the Systems, basic service and tier service fees accounted for
approximately 72% of total revenues, premium service fees accounted for
approximately 14% of total revenues, pay-per-view fees were approximately 1% of
total revenues, advertising fees were approximately 5% of total revenues and the
remaining 8% of total revenues came principally from equipment rentals,
installation fees and program guide sales. The Partnership and the Venture are
dependent

4
5
upon the timely receipt of service fees to provide for maintenance and
replacement of plant and equipment, current operating expenses and other costs
of the Systems.

FRANCHISES. The Systems are constructed and operated under non-exclusive,
fixed-term franchises or other types of operating authorities (referred to
collectively herein as "franchises") granted by local governmental authorities.
These franchises typically contain many conditions, such as time limitations on
commencement and completion of construction, conditions of services, including
the number of channels, types of programming and the provision of free service
to schools and certain other public institutions, and the maintenance of
insurance and indemnity bonds. The provisions of local franchises are subject to
federal regulation.

The Partnership holds 10 franchises in connection with its ownership of the
New York System, and the Venture holds one franchise issued by the City of
Manitowoc, Wisconsin. These franchises provide for the payment of fees to the
issuing authorities and generally range from 3% to 5% of the gross revenues of a
cable television system. The 1984 Cable Act prohibits franchising authorities
from imposing annual franchise fees in excess of 5% of gross revenues and also
permits the cable television system operator to seek renegotiation and
modification of franchise requirements if warranted by changed circumstances.

Neither the Partnership nor the Venture has ever had a franchise revoked,
although, as discussed below, the Venture has been unsuccessful in its attempts
to renew its franchise from the City of Manitowoc. The Partnership's New York
System franchise expiration dates range from May 1996 to June 2005. Because the
Partnership intends to sell its New York System (see Item 1, Proposed
Dispositions of Cable Television Systems), the Partnership does not intend to
renew the Village of Lancaster and the Town of Lancaster franchises that will
expire in 1996. The renewal of these franchises will be the responsibility of
the new owner.

The Venture holds one franchise for the City of Manitowoc, which
technically has expired. Negotiations between the Venture and the City of
Manitowoc with respect to the renewal of the Manitowoc System's franchise are
continuing, and the Manitowoc System currently is being operated pursuant to a
temporary extension of the franchise's term. The General Partner hopes that the
City soon will agree to the renewal of the franchise, but given the current
status of negotiations with the City, there can be no assurance of this. If the
current franchise is not renewed, the General Partner, on the Venture's behalf,
will avail itself of all remedies and recourse granted to cable operators under
federal and applicable state and local laws in order to preserve the Venture's
right to provide cable services in the City of Manitowoc. The Venture also would
seek the return of the $1,850,000, plus interest, that the Venture deposited
with the City of Manitowoc in connection with the settlement of the Venture's
lawsuit against the City. The settlement agreement provides for the return of
this amount to the Venture if the City fails to renew the franchise.

COMPETITION. Cable television systems currently experience competition from
several sources. A potential source of significant competition is Direct
Broadcast Satellite ("DBS") services that use video compression technology to
increase channel capacity and provide packages of movies, network and other
program services that are competitive with those of cable television systems.
Two companies offering DBS services began operations in 1994, and two other
companies offering DBS service recently began operations. In addition, a joint
venture has won the right to provide a DBS service through a FCC spectrum
auction. Not all subscribers terminate cable television service upon acquiring a
DBS system. The General Partner has observed that a number of DBS subscribers
also elect to subscribe to cable television service in order to obtain the
greatest variety of programming on multiple television sets, including local
video services programming not available through DBS service.

Although neither the Partnership, the Venture nor the General Partner has
yet encountered competition from a telephone company providing video services as
a cable operator or video dialtone operator, it is anticipated that the cable
television systems owned or managed by the General Partner will face such
competition in the near future. Legislation recently enacted into law will make
it possible for companies with considerable resources to enter the business. For
example, in February 1996, one of the regional Bell operating companies entered
into an agreement to acquire the nation's third largest cable television
company. In addition, several telephone companies

5
6
have begun seeking cable television franchises from local governmental
authorities as a consequence of litigation that successfully challenged the
constitutionality of the cable television/telephone company cross-ownership
rules. The General Partner cannot predict at this time when and to what extent
telephone companies will provide cable television service within service areas
in competition with cable television systems owned or managed by the General
Partner. The General Partner is aware of the following imminent competition from
telephone companies: Ameritech, one of the seven regional Bell operating
companies, which provides telephone service in a multi-state region including
Illinois, has just obtained a franchise that will allow it to provide cable
television service in Naperville, Illinois, a community currently served by a
cable system owned by another one of the public limited partnerships managed by
the General Partner. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia and
Bell Atlantic Video Service Company, both subsidiaries of Bell Atlantic, another
of the regional Bell operating companies, have announced their intention to
build a cable television system in Alexandria, Virginia in competition with a
cable television system owned by the General Partner. Bell Atlantic is preparing
for the operation of a telecommunications and video business in northern
Virginia, including the Alexandria metropolitan area. The FCC has granted GTE
Virginia's application for authority to construct, operate, own and maintain
video dialtone facilities in northern Virginia, including in the service area of
a cable television system owned by the General Partner. To date, GTE has not
begun construction of a video distribution system. The entry of telephone
companies as direct competitors could adversely affect the profitability and
market value of the General Partner's owned and managed systems.

Additional competition is present from several sources, including the
following: Master Antenna Television and Satellite Master Antenna Television
systems that serve multi-unit dwellings such as condominiums, apartment
complexes, motels, hotels and private residential communities; private cable
television/telephonic companies that have secured exclusive contracts to provide
video and telephony services to multi-unit dwellings and similar complexes; and
multichannel, multipoint distribution service ("MMDS") systems, commonly called
wireless cable which generally focus on providing service to residents of rural
areas. In addition, the FCC has established a new wireless telecommunications
service known as Personal Communications Service ("PCS") that would provide
portable non-vehicular mobile communications services similar to that available
from cellular telephone companies, but at a lower cost. Several cable television
multiple system operators hold or have requested experimental licenses from the
FCC to test PCS technology.

REGULATION AND LEGISLATION. The cable industry is regulated under the
Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the "1996 Act"), the Cable Television Consumer
Protection and Competition Act of 1992 (the "1992 Cable Act") and the Cable
Communications Policy Act of 1984 (the "1984 Cable Act") and the regulations
implementing these statutes. The Federal Communications Commission (the "FCC")
has promulgated regulations covering such areas as the registration of cable
television systems and other communications businesses, carriage of television
broadcast programming, consumer education and lockbox enforcement, origination
cablecasting and sponsorship identification, children's programming, the
regulation of basic cable and cable programming service rates in areas where
cable television systems are not subject to effective competition, signal
leakage and frequency use, technical performance, maintenance of various
records, equal employment opportunity, and antenna structure notification,
marking and lighting. In addition, cable operators periodically are required to
file various informational reports with the FCC. The FCC has the authority to
enforce these regulations through the imposition of substantial fines, the
issuance of cease and desist orders and/or the imposition of administrative
sanctions, such as the revocation of FCC licenses needed to operate certain
transmission facilities often used in connection with cable operations. State or
local franchising authorities, as applicable, also have the right to enforce
various regulations, impose fines or sanctions, issue orders or seek revocation
subject to the limitations imposed upon such franchising authorities by federal,
state and local laws and regulations. Several states have assumed regulatory
jurisdiction of the cable television industry, and it is anticipated that other
states will do so in the future. To the extent the cable television industry
begins providing telephone service, additional state regulations will be applied
to the cable television industry. Cable television operations are subject to
local regulation insofar as systems operate under franchises granted by local
authorities.

The following is a summary of federal laws and regulations materially
affecting the cable television industry, and a description of state and local
laws with which the cable industry must comply.

6
7
Telecommunications Act of 1996. The 1996 Act, which became law on February
28, 1996, substantially revised the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
including the 1984 Cable Act and the 1992 Cable Act, and has been described as
one of the most significant changes in communications regulation since the
original Communications Act of 1934. The 1996 Act is intended, in part, to
promote substantial competition in the telephone local exchange and in the
delivery of video and other services. As a result of the 1996 Act, local
telephone companies (also known as local exchange carriers or "LECs") and other
service providers are permitted to provide video programming, and cable
television operators are permitted entry into the telephone local exchange
market. The FCC is required to conduct rulemaking proceedings over the next
several months to implement various provisions of the 1996 Act.

Among other provisions, the 1996 Act modified the 1992 Cable Act by
deregulating the cable programming service tier of large cable operators
effective March 31, 1999 and the cable programming service tier of small cable
operators (those that provide service to 50,000 or fewer subscribers) effective
immediately. The 1996 Act also revised the procedures for filing a cable
programming service tier rate complaint and adds a new effective competition
test.

The most far-reaching changes in the communications business will result
from the telephony provisions of the 1996 Act. The statute expressly preempts
any legal barriers to competition in the local telephone business that
previously existed in state and local laws and regulations. Many of these
barriers had been lifted by state actions over the last few years, but the 1996
Act completes the task. The 1996 Act also establishes new requirements for
maintaining and enhancing universal telephone service and new obligations for
telecommunications providers to maintain privacy of customer information. The
1996 Act establishes uniform requirements and standards for entry, competitive
carrier interconnection and unbundling of LEC monopoly services.

The 1996 Act repealed the cable television/telephone cross-ownership ban
adopted in the 1984 Cable Act. The federal cross-ownership ban was particularly
important to the cable industry because telephone companies already own certain
facilities such as poles, ducts and associated rights of way. While this ban had
been overturned by several courts, formal removal of the ban ended the last
legal constraints on telephone company plans to enter the cable market. Under
the 1996 Act, telephone companies in their capacity as common carriers now may
lease capacity to others to provide cable television service. Telephone
companies have the option of providing video service as cable operators or
through "open video systems" ("OVS"), a regulatory regime that may provide more
flexibility than traditional cable service. The 1996 Act exempts OVS operators
from many of the regulatory obligations that currently apply to cable operators,
such as rate regulation and franchise fees, although other requirements are
still applicable. OVS operators, although not subject to franchise fees as
defined by the 1992 Cable Act, are subject to fees charged by local franchising
authorities or other governmental entities in lieu of franchise fees. (Under
certain circumstances, cable operators also will be able to offer service
through open video systems.) In addition, the 1996 Act eliminated the
requirement that telephone companies file Section 214 applications (applications
to provide video dialtone services) with the FCC before providing video service.
This limits the opportunity of cable operators to mount challenges at the FCC
regarding telephone company entry into the video market. The 1996 Act also
contains restrictions on buying out incumbent cable operators in a telephone
company's service area, especially in suburban and urban markets.

Other parts of the 1996 Act also will affect cable operators. Under the
1996 Act, the FCC is required to revise the current pole attachment rate
formula. This revision will result in an increase in the rates paid by entities,
including cable operators, that provide telecommunication services. The rates
will be phased in after a five-year period. (Cable operators that provide only
cable services will be unaffected.) Under the V-chip provisions of the 1996 Act,
cable operators and other video providers are required to pass along any program
rating information that programmers include in video signals. Cable operators
also are subject to new scrambling requirements for sexually explicit
programming, and cable operators that provide Internet access or other online
services are subject to the new indecency limitations for computer services. In
addition, cable operators that

7
8
provide Internet access or other online services are subject to the new
indecency limitations for computer services, although these provisions already
have been challenged in court. These provisions already have been challenged,
and the courts have preliminarily enjoined the enforcement of these
content-based provisions.

Under the 1996 Act, a franchising authority may not require a cable
operator to provide telecommunications services or facilities, other than an
institutional network, as a condition to a grant, renewal or transfer of a cable
franchise, and franchising authorities are preempted from regulating
telecommunications services provided by cable operators and from requiring cable
operators to obtain a franchise to provide such services. The 1996 Act also
repealed the 1992 Cable Act's anti-trafficking provision, which generally
required the holding of cable television systems for three years.

It is premature to predict the specific effects of the 1996 Act on the
cable industry in general or the Partnership in particular. The FCC shortly will
be undertaking numerous rulemaking proceedings to interpret and implement the
1996 Act. It is not possible at this time to predict the outcome of those
proceedings or their effect on the Partnership.

Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992. The 1992
Cable Act, which became effective on December 4, 1992, caused significant
changes to the regulatory environment in which the cable television industry
operates. The 1992 Cable Act generally mandated a greater degree of regulation
of the cable television industry. Under the 1992 Cable Act's definition of
effective competition, nearly all cable television systems in the United States,
including those owned and managed by the General Partner, became subject to rate
regulation of basic cable services. In addition, the 1992 Cable Act allowed the
FCC to regulate rates for non-basic service tiers other than premium services in
response to complaints filed by franchising authorities and/or cable
subscribers. In April 1993, the FCC adopted regulations governing rates for
basic and non-basic services. The FCC's rules became effective on September 1,
1993. In compliance with these rules, the General Partner on behalf of the
Partnership and the Venture reduced rates charged for certain regulated services
in the New York System and the Manitowoc System effective September 1, 1993.

On February 22, 1994, however, the FCC adopted several additional rate
orders including an order which revised its earlier-announced regulatory scheme
with respect to rates. The FCC's new regulations generally required rate
reductions, absent a successful cost-of-service showing, of 17 percent of
September 30, 1992 rates, adjusted for inflation, channel modifications,
equipment costs, and increases in programming costs. Further rate reductions for
cable systems whose rates are below the revised benchmark levels, as well as
reductions that would require operators to reduce rates below benchmark levels
in order to achieve a 17 percent rate reduction, were held in abeyance pending
completion of cable system cost studies. The FCC recently requested some of
these "low price" systems to complete cost study questionnaires. After review of
these questionnaires, the FCC could decide to permanently defer any further rate
reductions, or require the additional 7 percent rate roll back for some or all
of these systems. The FCC has also adopted its proposed upgrade methodology by
which operators would be permitted to recover the costs of upgrading their
plant.

After analyzing the effects of the two methods of rate regulation, the
Partnership elected to file cost-of-service showings for the New York System.
The General Partner anticipates no further reduction of revenues or operating
income before depreciation and amortization resulting from the FCC's rate
regulations. At this time, the regulatory authorities have not approved the
cost-of-service showings, and there can be no assurance that the Partnership's
cost-of-service showings will prevent further rate reductions until such final
approval is received. The Venture complied with the new benchmark regulations
and further reduced rates in its Manitowoc System. The Venture will continue its
efforts to mitigate the effect of such rate reductions.

On November 10, 1994, the FCC also announced a revision to its regulations
governing the manner in which cable operators may charge subscribers for new
cable programming services. In addition to the present formula for calculating
the permissible rate for new services, the FCC instituted a three-year flat fee
mark-up plan for charges relating to new channels of cable programming services.
Commencing on January 1, 1995, cable system operators may charge for new
channels of cable programming services added after May 14, 1994 at a rate of up
to 20 cents per channel, but may not make adjustments to monthly rates totaling
more than $1.20 plus an

8
9
additional 30 cents for programming license fees per subscriber over the first
two years of the three-year period for these new services. Operators may charge
an additional 20 cents in the third year only for channels added in that year
plus the costs for the programming. Operators electing to use the 20 cent per
channel adjustment may not also take a 7.5 percent mark-up on programming cost
increases, which is permitted under the FCC's current rate regulations. The FCC
has requested further comment as to whether cable operators should continue to
receive the 7.5 percent mark-up on increases in license fees on existing
programming services.

The FCC also announced that it will permit operators to offer a "new
product tier" ("NPT"). Operators will be able to price the NPT as they elect so
long as, among other conditions, other channels that are subject to rate
regulation are priced in conformity with applicable regulations and operators do
not remove programming services from existing tiers and offer them on the NPT.

In September 1995, the FCC authorized a new, alternative method of
implementing rate adjustments which will allow cable operators to increase rates
for programming annually on the basis of projected increases in external costs
(inflation, costs for programming, franchise-related obligations and changes in
the number of regulated channels) rather than on the basis of cost increases
incurred in the preceding calendar quarter. Operators that elect not to recover
all of their accrued external costs and inflation pass-throughs each year may
recover them (with interest) in subsequent years.

In December 1995, the FCC adopted final cost-of-service rate regulations
requiring, among other things, cable operators to exclude 34 percent of system
acquisition costs related to intangible and tangible assets used to provide
regulated services. The FCC also reaffirmed the industry-wide 11.25 percent
after tax rate of return on an operator's allowable rate base, but initiated a
further rulemaking in which it proposes to use an operator's actual debt cost
and capital structure to determine an operator's cost of capital or rate of
return. After a rate has been set pursuant to a cost-of-service showing, rate
increases for regulated services are indexed for inflation, and operators are
permitted to increase rates in response to increases in costs beyond their
control, such as taxes and increased programming costs.

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
recently upheld the FCC's rate regulations implemented pursuant to the 1992
Cable Act, but ruled that the FCC impermissibly failed to permit cable operators
to adjust rates for certain cost increases incurred during the period between
the date the 1992 Cable Act was passed through the initial date of rate
regulation. The FCC has not yet implemented the court's ruling.

There have been several lawsuits filed by cable operators and programmers
in federal court challenging various aspects of the 1992 Cable Act including its
provisions relating to mandatory broadcast signal carriage, retransmission
consent, access to cable programming, rate regulations, commercial leased
channels and public access channels. On April 8, 1993, a three-judge federal
district court panel issued a decision upholding the constitutionality of the
mandatory signal carriage requirements of the 1992 Cable Act. That decision was
appealed directly to the United States Supreme Court. The United States Supreme
Court vacated the lower court decision on June 27, 1994 and remanded the case to
the district court for further development of a factual record. On December 12,
1995, the three-judge federal district court again upheld the must-carry rules'
validity. This decision has been appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

In 1993, a federal district court upheld provisions of the 1992 Cable Act
concerning rate regulation, retransmission consent, restrictions on vertically
integrated cable television operators and programmers, mandatory carriage of
programming on commercial leased channels and public, educational and
governmental access channels and the exemption for municipalities from civil
damage liability arising out of local regulation of cable services. The 1992
Cable Act's provisions providing for multiple ownership limits for cable
operators and advance notice of free previews for certain programming services
have been found unconstitutional and these decisions have been appealed. The
FCC's regulations relating to the carriage of indecent programming, which were
recently upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia, have been appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

9
10
Franchising. The responsibility for franchising or other authorization of
cable television systems is left to state and local authorities. There are,
however, several provisions in the 1984 Cable Act that govern the terms and
conditions under which cable television systems provide service. These include
uniform standards and policies that are applicable to cable television operators
seeking renewal of a cable television franchise. The procedures established
provide for a formal renewal process should the franchising authority and the
cable television operator decline to use an informal procedure. A franchising
authority unable to make a preliminary determination to renew a franchise is
required to hold a hearing in which the operator has the right to participate.
In the event a determination is made not to renew the franchise at the
conclusion of the hearing, the franchising authority must provide the operator
with a written decision stating the specific reasons for non-renewal. Generally,
the franchising authority can finally decide not to renew a franchise only if it
finds that the cable operator has not substantially complied with the material
terms of the present franchise, has not provided reasonable service in light of
the community's needs, does not have the financial, legal or technical ability
to provide the services being proposed for the future, or has not presented a
reasonable proposal for future service. A final decision of non-renewal by the
franchising authority is appealable in court.

A provision of the 1996 Act preempts franchising authorities from
regulating telecommunications services provided by cable operators and from
requiring cable operators to obtain a franchise to provide such services. A
franchising authority may not require a cable operator to provide
telecommunications services or facilities, other than an institutional network,
as a condition to a grant, renewal or transfer of a cable franchise.

GENERAL. The Partnership's and the Venture's business consist of providing
cable television services to a large number of customers, the loss of any one of
which would have no material effect on the Partnership's or the Venture's
business. Each of the Systems has had some subscribers who later terminated the
service. Terminations occur primarily because people move to another home or to
another city. In other cases, people terminate on a seasonal basis or because
they no longer can afford or are dissatisfied with the service. The amount of
past due accounts in the Systems is not significant. The General Partner's
policy with regard to past due accounts is basically one of disconnecting
service before a past due account becomes material.

Neither the Partnership nor the Venture depends to any material extent on
the availability of raw materials; it carries no significant amounts of
inventory and it has no material backlog of customer orders. The Partnership has
no employees because all properties are managed by employees of the General
Partner. The General Partner has engaged in research and development activities
relating to the provision of new services but the amount of the Partnership's or
the Venture's funds expended for such research and development has never been
material.

Compliance with federal, state and local provisions that have been enacted
or adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment or
otherwise relating to the protection of the environment has had no material
effect upon the capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position of the
Partnership or the Venture.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The cable television systems owned by the Partnership and the Venture are
described below:

10
11

FUND SYSTEM ACQUISITION DATE
- ------------------------ ---------------- ----------------

Cable TV Fund 11-B, Ltd. New York System January 1988

Cable TV Fund 11-A, Ltd., Cable Manitowoc System April 1984
TV Fund 11-B, Ltd., Cable TV
Fund 11-C, Ltd. and Cable TV
Fund 11-D, Ltd. own an 18%,
8%, 27% and 47% interest,
respectively, through their general
partner interest in Cable TV Joint
Fund 11

The following sets forth (i) the monthly basic plus service rates charged
to subscribers and (ii) the number of basic subscribers and pay units for the
Systems. The monthly basic service rates set forth herein represent, with
respect to systems with multiple headends, the basic service rate charged to the
majority of the subscribers within the system. In cable television systems,
basic subscribers can subscribe to more than one pay TV service. Thus, the total
number of pay services subscribed to by basic subscribers are called pay units.
As of December 31, 1995, the New York System's cable plant passed approximately
57,700 homes, representing an approximate 68% penetration rate, and the
Manitowoc System's cable plant passed approximately 16,000 homes, representing
an approximate 71% penetration rate. Figures for numbers of subscribers, miles
of cable plant and homes passed are compiled from the General Partner's records
and may be subject to adjustments.

CABLE TV FUND 11-B, LTD.
- ------------------------

At December 31,
-------------------------
NEW YORK SYSTEM 1995 1994 1993
- --------------- ------- ------- -------

Monthly basic plus service rate $ 23.45 $ 21.95 $ 21.95
Basic subscribers 39,735 37,619 35,877
Pay units 22,275 22,755 21,502

CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11
- ----------------------

At December 31,
------------------------
MANITOWOC SYSTEM 1995 1994 1993
- ---------------- ------- ------- ------

Monthly basic plus service rate $ 20.66 $ 19.86 $21.95
Basic subscribers 11,436 10,834 9,768
Pay units 7,726 7,091 5,296

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

In January and February 1996, a special vote of the limited partners of the
Partnership was conducted through the mails on behalf of the Partnership by the
General Partner for the purpose of obtaining limited partner approval of the
sale to Global Acquisition Partners, L.P. of the New York System for $84,000,000
in cash, subject to normal working capital closing adjustments. Limited partners
of record at the close of business on December 31, 1995 were entitled to notice
of, and to participate in, this vote of limited partners. Of the 38,026

11
12
limited partnership interests entitled to vote, 26,333 interests, or 69.25
percent, voted to approve the transaction, 76 interests, or .20 percent, voted
against the transaction, 210 interests, or .55 percent, abstained from voting
and 11,407 interests, or 30 percent, did not vote on the proposal. It is
anticipated that the sale of the New York System will occur on or about April 1,
1996. See Item 1, Business.

PART II.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK
AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS

While the Partnership is publicly held, there is no public market for the
limited partnership interests, and it is not expected that a market will develop
in the future. As of February 15, 1996, the number of equity security holders in
the Partnership was 3,164.

12
13

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

For the Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cable TV Fund 11-B, Ltd. 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
- ------------------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

Revenues $14,366,359 $12,791,832 $11,922,307 $11,817,424 $11,434,838
Depreciation and
Amortization 2,957,444 2,379,471 1,899,145 1,737,457 1,781,846
Operating Income 1,529,866 1,324,181 1,125,375 1,733,870 2,130,580
Net Income (Loss) (158,865) 136,953 480,661 12,900,586(a) 600,619
Net Income (Loss)
per Limited
Partnership Unit (4.14) 3.57 12.51 335.86(a) 15.64
Weighted Average
Number of Limited
Partnership Units
Outstanding 38,026 38,026 38,026 38,026 38,026
General Partner's
Capital (Deficit) 53,221 54,810 53,440 48,633 (80,373)
Limited Partners'
Capital (Deficit) 2,702,835 2,860,111 2,724,528 2,248,674 (663,525)
Total Assets 28,153,665 26,514,695 22,298,044 14,496,416 14,672,979
Debt 23,807,849 20,228,189 18,089,150 10,624,649 13,585,067
General Partner
Advances - 1,305,421 42,288 177,673 569,634

(a) Net income resulted primarily from the sale of the Grand Island System by
Cable TV Fund 11-B, Ltd.

For the Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cable TV Joint Fund 11 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
- ---------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Revenues $3,632,675 $3,296,103 $3,292,675 $3,244,023 $3,019,516
Depreciation and
Amortization 545,237 522,593 517,441 499,110 481,071
Operating Income 296,393 309,189 416,589 426,058 333,948
Net Income 453,912 373,181 246,536 325,547 457,909
Partners' Capital 7,051,757 6,597,845 6,224,664 5,978,128 5,652,581
Total Assets 7,504,046 7,099,110 6,610,142 6,723,916 6,137,193
Debt 9,917 26,385 20,129 29,188 28,738
Advances from
Jones Intercable, Inc. 45,258 72,764 32,825 52,745 227,810

13
14
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations

CABLE TV FUND 11-B, LTD.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

1995 compared to 1994

Revenues of Cable TV Fund 11-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership") totaled
$14,366,359 in 1995 as compared to $12,791,832 in 1994, an increase of
$1,574,527, or approximately 12 percent. Basic rate increases accounted for
approximately 64 percent of the increase in revenues. An increase in the
subscriber base accounted for approximately 33 percent of the increase in
revenues. The number of basic subscribers increased 2,116, or approximately 6
percent, to 39,735 at December 31, 1995 from 37,619 at December 31, 1994. No
other factors individually were significant to the increase in revenues.

Operating expenses consist primarily of costs associated with the
administration of the Partnership's cable television system. The principal
cost components are salaries paid to system personnel, programming expenses,
professional fees, subscriber billing costs, rent for leased facilities, cable
system maintenance expenses and consumer marketing expenses.

Operating expenses totaled $8,123,450 in 1995 compared to $7,459,002
in 1994, an increase of $664,448, or approximately 9 percent. Operating
expenses represented approximately 57 percent of revenues in 1995 compared to
approximately 58 percent of revenues in 1994. The increase in operating
expenses was due to increases in programming fees and system maintenance costs,
due, in part, to the increase in the subscriber base. These increases were
offset, in part, by decreases in personnel related expense. No other factors
individually were significant to the increase in the Partnership's operating
expenses.

Management fees and allocated overhead from the General Partner
totaled $1,755,599 in 1995 compared to $1,629,178 in 1994, an increase of
$126,421, or approximately 8 percent, due to the increase in revenues, upon
which such fees and allocations are based.

Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $2,957,444 in 1995
compared to $2,379,471 in 1994, an increase of $577,973, or approximately 24
percent, due to capital additions in 1995 and 1994.

Operating income totaled $1,529,866 in 1995 compared to $1,324,181 in
1994, an increase of $205,685, or approximately 16 percent, due to the increase
in revenues exceeding the increases in operating expenses, management fees and
allocated overhead from the General Partner and depreciation and amortization
expense.

The cable television industry generally measures the performance of a
cable television system in terms of cash flow or operating income before
depreciation and amortization. The value of a cable television system is often
determined using multiples of cash flow. This measure is not intended to be a
substitute or improvement upon the items disclosed on the financial statements,
rather it is included because it is an industry standard. Operating income
before depreciation and amortization totaled $4,487,310 in 1995 compared to
$3,703,652 in 1994, an increase of $783,658, or approximately 21 percent, due
to the increase in revenues exceeding the increases in operating expenses and
management fees and overhead from the General Partner.

Interest expense totaled $1,773,876 in 1995 compared to $1,126,399 in
1994, an increase of $647,477, or approximately 57 percent, due to higher
outstanding balances on interest bearing obligations and higher effective
interest rates during 1995.

The Partnership recognized net loss before equity in net income of
cable television joint venture of $194,179 in 1995 compared to income before
equity in net income of cable television joint venture of $107,920 in 1994, a
decrease of $302,099, due primarily to the increase in interest expense.

14
15
1994 compared to 1993

Revenues of the Partnership totaled $12,791,832 in 1994 compared to
$11,922,307 in 1993, an increase of $869,525, or approximately 7 percent. An
increase in basic subscribers primarily accounted for the increase in revenues.
The number of basic subscribers increased 1,742, or approximately 5 percent, to
37,619 at December 31, 1994 from 35,877 at December 31, 1993. The increase in
revenues would have been greater but for the reduction in basic rates due to
basic rate regulations issued by the FCC in April 1993 with which the
Partnership complied effective September 1, 1993. No other factors
individually were significant to the increase in revenues.

Operating expenses totaled $7,459,002 in 1994 compared to $7,476,761
in 1993, a decrease of $17,759, or less than 1 percent. Operating expenses
represented approximately 58 percent of revenues in 1994 compared to
approximately 63 percent in 1993. The decrease in operating expenses was due
primarily to decreases in personnel related and marketing related expenses.
These decreases were partially offset by increases in programming fees and
plant maintenance costs. No other factors individually were significant to the
decrease in operating expenses.

Management fees and allocated overhead from the General Partner
totaled $1,629,178 in 1994 compared to $1,421,026 in 1993, an increase of
$208,152, or approximately 15 percent, due to the increase in revenues, upon
which such fees and allocations are based, and to an increase in expenses
allocated from the General Partner. The General Partner experienced increases
in expenses in 1994.

Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $2,379,471 in 1994
compared to $1,899,145 in 1993, an increase of $480,326, or approximately 25
percent, due to capital additions in 1994 and 1993.

Operating income totaled $1,324,181 in 1994 compared to $1,125,375 in
1993, an increase of $198,806, or approximately 18 percent, due to the increase
in revenues exceeding the increases in operating expenses, management fees and
allocated overhead from the General Partner and depreciation and amortization
expense.

Interest expense totaled $1,126,399 in 1994 compared to $636,263 in
1993, an increase of $490,136, or approximately 77 percent, due to higher
outstanding balances on interest bearing obligations and higher effective
interest rates.

Income before equity in net income of cable television joint venture
totaled $107,920 in 1994 compared to $461,481 in 1993, a decrease of $353,561,
or approximately 77 percent, due to the increase in interest expense exceeding
the increase in operating income.

In addition to the New York System owned by it, the Partnership also
owns an 8 percent interest in Cable TV Joint Fund 11 ("Joint Fund 11"). Refer
to Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for Joint Fund 11 for details pertaining to its operation.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

On October 6, 1995, the Partnership entered into an asset purchase
agreement pursuant to which it agreed to sell the New York System to an
unaffiliated cable television system operator for a sales price of $84,000,000.
This transaction was approved by a majority of the Partnership's limited
partnership interests in a vote conducted during the first quarter of 1996.
The closing of the sale of the New York System is subject to the successful
transfer of the New York System's franchises. Closing of this sale is expected
to occur on or about April 1, 1996.

15
16
Partnership, from the net proceeds of the New York System's sale. Once the
distribution of the net proceeds from the sale of the New York System has been
made, limited partners will have received a total of $1,605 for each $500
limited partnership interest, or $3,211 for each $1,000 invested in the
Partnership, taking into account distributions to limited partners made in July
1990 and July 1992. The Partnership will continue to own its 8 percent
interest in the Venture until the Manitowoc System also is sold. Upon the
closing of the sale of the Partnership's New York System and the Venture's
Manitowoc System, the Partnership will be liquidated and dissolved.

On September 5, 1995, Joint Fund 11 entered into an asset purchase
agreement pursuant to which it agreed to sell the Manitowoc System to the
General Partner for a sales price of $15,735,667, subject to normal working
capital closing adjustments. The closing of the sale of the Manitowoc System
is subject to a number of conditions, including the approval of the holders of
a majority of the limited partnership interests in each of the four
partnerships that comprise Joint Fund 11 in votes to be conducted in 1996 and
the successful renewal and transfer of the Manitowoc System's franchise.

If the proposed sale of the Manitowoc System is closed, Joint Fund 11
will pay all of its indebtedness, which totaled $55,175 at December 1995,
including $45,258 owed to the General Partner, and then the net sales proceeds
plus cash on hand will be distributed to Joint Fund 11's partners in proportion
to their ownership interests in Joint Fund 11. The Partnership accordingly
will receive 8 percent of such proceeds, estimated to total approximately
$1,432,700. Because limited partners will have already received distributions
in an amount in excess of the capital initially contributed to the Partnership
by the limited partners, the Partnership's portion of the net proceeds from the
Manitowoc System's sale will be distributed 75 percent to the limited partners
and 25 percent to the General Partner. Based upon pro forma financial
information as of December 31, 1995, as a result of the Manitowoc System's
sale, the limited partners of the Partnership, as a group, will receive
approximately $1,074,500 and the General Partner will receive approximately
$358,200. As a result, it is anticipated that the limited partners will
receive approximately $28 for each $500 limited partnership interest, or
approximately $57 for each $1,000 invested in the Partnership, from the
Partnership's portion of the net proceeds of the Manitowoc System's sale.
After the Partnership distributes its portion of the proceeds from the sale of
the Manitowoc System to its partners, the Partnership will be dissolved and
liquidated.

The Partnership expended approximately $4,143,000 on capital
improvements during 1995. Of this total, approximately 34 percent related to
the completion of the franchise required rebuild and upgrade of the New York
System. Plant extensions and service drops to subscriber homes accounted for
approximately 24 percent of the capital expenditures. Converters accounted for
approximately 10 percent of the capital expenditures. The remainder of the
expenditures were for various other enhancements in the New York System.
Funding for these expenditures was provided primarily by cash generated from
operations and borrowings under the Partnership's credit facility. Capital
additions for 1996 will consist of expenditures necessary to maintain the value
of the plant until the New York System is sold. Funding for these expenditures
is expected to be provided by cash generated from operations and available
borrowings from the Partnership's existing credit facility.

The Partnership has sufficient sources of capital available to meet
its presently anticipated needs from its ability to generate cash from
operations and from borrowings available under its credit facility.

In addition to the New York System owned by it, the Partnership owns
an 8 percent interest in Joint Fund 11. This investment is accounted for under
the equity method. When compared to the December 31, 1994 balance, this
investment has increased by $35,314 from $550,483 at December 31, 1994 to
$585,797 at December 31, 1995. This increase represents the Partnership's
proportionate share of income generated by Joint Fund 11. Refer to
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for Joint Fund 11 for details pertaining to its financial condition.

REGULATION AND LEGISLATION

16
17
not yet received final approvals from regulatory authorities, however, and
there can be no assurance that the Partnership's cost-of-service showings will
prevent further rate reductions in this system until such final approvals are
received.

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the "1996 Act"), which became law
on February 8, 1996, substantially revised the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, including the 1984 Cable Act and the 1992 Cable Act, and has been
described as one of the most significant changes in communications regulation
since the original Communications Act of 1934. The 1996 Act is intended, in
part, to promote substantial competition in the telephone local exchange and in
the delivery of video and other services. As a result of the 1996 Act, local
telephone companies (also known as local exchange carriers or "LECs") and other
service providers are permitted to provide video programming, and cable
television operators are permitted entry into the telephone local exchange
market. The FCC is required to conduct rulemaking proceedings over the next
several months to implement various provisions of the 1996 Act.

Among other provisions, the 1996 Act modified the 1992 Cable Act by
deregulating the cable programming service tier of large cable operators
including the Partnership effective March 31, 1999 and the cable programming
service tier of "small" cable operators in systems providing service to 50,000
or fewer subscribers effective immediately. The 1996 Act also revised the
procedures for filing cable programming service tier rate complaints and adds a
new effective competition test.

It is premature to predict the specific effects of the 1996 Act on the
cable industry in general or the Partnership in particular. The FCC will be
undertaking numerous rulemaking proceedings to interpret and implement the 1996
Act. It is not possible at this time to predict the outcome of those
proceedings or their effect on the Partnership. See Item 1.

CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

1995 compared to 1994

Revenues in Joint Fund 11's Manitowoc System totaled $3,632,675 in
1995 compared to $3,296,103 in 1994, an increase of $336,572, or approximately
10 percent. An increase in the subscriber base accounted for approximately 55
percent of the increase in revenues in 1995. The number of basic subscribers
increased by 602 subscribers, or approximately 6 percent, to 11,436 at December
31, 1995 from 10,834 at December 31, 1994. The number of premium subscribers
increased by 635 subscriptions, or approximately 9 percent, to 7,726 at
December 31, 1995 from 7,091 at December 31, 1994. Basic service rate
increases accounted for approximately 14 percent of the increase in revenues.
An increase in advertising sales activity accounted for approximately 22
percent of the increase in revenues. No other individual factor contributed
significantly to the increase in revenues.

Operating expenses consist primarily of costs associated with the
administration of the Manitowoc System. The principal cost components are
salaries paid to system personnel, programming expenses, professional fees,
subscriber billing costs, rent for leased facilities, cable system maintenance
expenses and consumer marketing expenses.

Operating expenses in the Manitowoc System totaled $2,327,354 in 1995
compared to $2,026,763 in 1994, an increase of $300,591, or approximately 15
percent. Operating expenses represented approximately 64 percent of revenues
in 1995 compared to approximately 61 percent of revenues in 1994. The increase
in expenses was primarily due to an increase in programming fees, property tax
expense and advertising sales related expenses. The increase in advertising
sales related expenses was due, in part, to an increase in advertising sales
activity. No other individual factor significantly affected the increase in
operating expenses.

Management fees and allocated overhead from the General Partner
totaled $463,691 for 1995 compared to $437,558 in 1994, an increase of $26,133,
or approximately 6 percent. The increase was due to the increase in revenues,
upon which such fees and allocations are based, and increases in allocated
expenses from the General Partner.

Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $545,237 in 1995
compared to $522,593 in 1994, an increase of $22,644, or approximately 4
percent, due to capital additions in 1995 and 1994.

17
18
Operating income totaled $296,393 in 1995 compared to $309,189 in
1994, a decrease of $12,796, or approximately 4 percent. The decrease was due
to the increases in operating expenses, management fees and allocated overhead
from the General Partner and depreciation and amortization expense exceeding
the increase in revenues.

The cable television industry generally measures the performance of a
cable television system in terms of cash flow or operating income before
depreciation and amortization. The value of a cable television system is often
determined using multiples of cash flow. This measure is not intended to be a
substitute or improvement upon the items disclosed on the financial statements,
rather it is included because it is an industry standard. Operating income
before depreciation and amortization totaled $841,630 for 1995 compared to
$831,782 in 1994, an increase of $9,848, or approximately 1 percent. The
increase was due to the increase in revenues exceeding the increases in
operating expenses and management fees and allocated overhead from the General
Partner.

Interest income totaled $166,280 in 1995 compared to $87,134 in 1994,
an increase of $79,146, or approximately 91 percent. This increase was due to
higher cash balances and higher interest rates on interest-bearing accounts in
1995.

Interest expense totaled $10,003 in 1995 compared to $15,716 in 1994,
a decrease of $5,713, or approximately 36 percent. The decrease was due to
lower outstanding balances on interest bearing obligations in 1995.

Net income of Joint Fund 11 totaled $453,912 in 1995 compared to
$373,181 in 1994, an increase of $80,731, or approximately 22 percent. The
increase was due primarily to the increase in interest income.

1994 compared to 1993

Revenues in the Manitowoc System totaled $3,296,103 in 1994 compared
to $3,292,675 in 1993, an increase of $3,428, or less than 1 percent. An
increase in the subscriber base primarily accounted for the increase in
revenues. Basic service subscribers increased 1,066, or approximately 11
percent, to 10,834 at December 31, 1994 from 9,768 at December 31, 1993.
Premium service subscriptions increased 1,795, or approximately 34 percent, to
7,091 at December 31, 1994 from 5,296 at December 31, 1993. The increase in
revenues would have been greater but for reductions in basic service rates due
to basic service rate regulations issued by the FCC in May 1993 and February
1994. No other individual factor was significant to the increase in revenues.

Operating expenses in the Manitowoc System totaled $2,026,763 in 1994
compared to $1,947,068 in 1993, an increase of $79,695, or approximately 4
percent. The increase in operating expenses was due primarily to increases in
programming fees and marketing related costs due to increases in basic service
subscribers and premium service subscriptions. These increases were partially
offset by a decrease in copyright fees. No other individual factor contributed
significantly to the increase in operating expenses. Operating expenses
represented approximately 61 percent of revenues in 1994 compared to
approximately 59 percent of revenues in 1993.

Management fees and allocated overhead from the General Partner
totaled $437,558 in 1994 compared to $411,577 in 1993, an increase of $25,981,
or approximately 6 percent. The increase was due to an increase in allocated
expenses from the General Partner. The General Partner experienced increases
in expenses in 1994.

Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $522,593 in 1994
compared to $517,441 in 1993, an increase of $5,152, or approximately 1
percent, due to capital additions in 1994 and 1993.

Operating income in the Manitowoc System totaled $309,189 in 1994
compared to $416,589 in 1993, a decrease of $107,400, or approximately 26
percent. The decrease was due to the increases in operating expenses,
allocated overhead from the General Partner and depreciation and amortization
expense exceeding the increase in revenues.

Interest expense for Joint Fund 11 totaled $15,716 in 1994 compared to
$22,912 in 1993, a decrease of $7,196, or approximately 31 percent, due to a
lower outstanding balance on interest bearing obligations. Other expense
totaled $7,426 in 1994 compared to $248,912 in 1993, primarily as a result of
Joint Fund 11 incurring costs associated with the litigation with the City of
Manitowoc during 1993. No such costs were incurred in 1994.

Net income for Joint Fund 11 totaled $373,181 in 1994 compared to
$246,536 in 1993, an increase of $126,645, or approximately 51 percent, due
primarily to the decrease in litigation costs discussed above.

18
19
FINANCIAL CONDITION

On September 5, 1995, Joint Fund 11 entered into an asset purchase
agreement pursuant to which it agreed to sell the Manitowoc System to the
General Partner for a sales price of $15,735,667, subject to normal working
capital closing adjustments. This sales price is the average of three separate
independent appraisals of the fair market value of the Manitowoc System and the
General Partner's offer was the only bid tendered in a public bidding process
for the Manitowoc System. The General Partner assigned its rights and
obligations under the asset purchase agreement to Jones Cable Holdings, Inc.
("JCH"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the General Partner. The closing of the
sale will occur on a date upon which Joint Fund 11 and JCH mutually agree by
September 30, 1996. The sale of the Manitowoc System is subject to a number of
conditions, including approval of the transaction by the holders of a majority
of the Partnership's limited partnership interests and approvals from
governmental authorities and other third parties necessary to the transfer of
the Manitowoc System. If all conditions precedent to JCH's obligation to
close are not eventually satisfied or waived, JCH's obligation to purchase the
Manitowoc System will terminate on September 30, 1996.

In order to sell the Manitowoc System, Joint Fund 11 must obtain the
consent of the City of Manitowoc and third parties with whom Joint Fund 11 has
contracts related to the Manitowoc System, such as pole attachment agreements
or other service agreements, to the transfer thereof. Joint Fund 11 was
unsuccessful in its efforts to sell the Manitowoc System in June 1990, at the
time of Joint Fund 11's sale of its remaining Wisconsin cable television
systems, due to the refusal of the City of Manitowoc to consent to the transfer
of the system's franchise. Negotiations with the City of Manitowoc with
respect to the renewal and transfer of the Manitowoc System's franchise are
continuing, and the Manitowoc System currently is being operated pursuant to a
temporary extension of the franchise's term until March 29, 1996. The General
Partner hopes that the City ultimately will agree to the renewal and transfer
of the franchise and that the City will not take any action that will prevent
the closing of the sale of the Manitowoc System, but given the current status
of negotiations with the City there can be no assurance that the sale will
occur as planned.

If the proposed sale of the Manitowoc System is closed, Joint Fund 11
intends to distribute the sale proceeds, after the repayment of debt, to Cable
TV Fund 11-A, Ltd., Cable TV Fund 11-B, Ltd., Cable TV Fund 11-C, Ltd. and
Cable TV Fund 11-D, Ltd. Net sales proceeds plus Joint Fund 11's cash on hand,
which are expected to total approximately $18,420,800, will be distributed as
follows: Cable TV Fund 11-A, Ltd. will receive approximately $3,356,700; Cable
TV Fund 11-B, Ltd. will receive approximately $1,432,700; Cable TV Fund 11-C,
Ltd. will receive approximately $4,994,100 and Cable TV Fund 11-D, Ltd. will
receive approximately $8,637,300. After Joint Fund 11 distributes the proceeds
from the sale of the Manitowoc System to its partners, Joint Fund 11 will be
liquidated and dissolved.

Joint Fund 11 had no bank debt outstanding at December 31, 1995.

During 1995, Joint Fund 11 expended approximately $311,000 for capital
expenditures in the Manitowoc System. These expenditures were used for various
projects to maintain the value of the system. These expenditures were funded
from cash generated from operations.

Capital expenditures in 1996 for the Manitowoc System will consist of
expenditures necessary to maintain the value of the Manitowoc System until it
is sold. It is expected that these capital expenditures will be funded from
cash on hand and cash generated from operations. Joint Fund 11 has sufficient
liquidity and capital resources, including cash on hand and its ability to
generate cash from operations, to meet its anticipated needs.

REGULATION AND LEGISLATION

19
20
Among other provisions, the 1996 Act modified the 1992 Cable Act by
deregulating the cable programming service tier of large cable operators
including Joint Fund 11 effective March 31, 1999 and the cable programming
service tier of "small" cable operators in systems providing service to 50,000
or fewer subscribers effective immediately. The 1996 Act also revised the
procedures for filing cable programming service tier rate complaints and adds a
new effective competition test.

It is premature to predict the specific effects of the 1996 Act on the
cable industry in general or Joint Fund 11 in particular. The FCC will be
undertaking numerous rulemaking proceedings to interpret and implement the 1996
Act. It is not possible at this time to predict the outcome of those
proceedings or their effect on Joint Fund 11. See Item 1.

20
21
Item 8. Financial Statements

CABLE TV FUND 11-B, LTD. AND
CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND 1994

INDEX

Page
-------------------------------

11-B Joint Fund 11
---- -------------

Report of Independent Public Accountants 22 34

Balance Sheets 23 35

Statements of Operations 25 37

Statements of Partners' Capital (Deficit) 26 38

Statements of Cash Flows 27 39

Notes to Financial Statements 28 40

21
22

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Partners of Cable TV Fund 11-B, Ltd.:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of CABLE TV FUND 11-B,
LTD. (a Colorado limited partnership) as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the
related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the General Partner's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cable TV Fund 11-B,
Ltd. as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the results of its operations and
its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Denver, Colorado,
March 8, 1996.

22
23
CABLE TV FUND 11-B, LTD.
(A Limited Partnership)

BALANCE SHEETS

December 31,
---------------------------------

ASSETS 1995 1994
------ ------------ ------------

CASH $ 325,270 $ 139,532

TRADE RECEIVABLES, less allowance for doubtful
receivables of $65,516 and $72,936 at
December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively 554,478 472,417

INVESTMENT IN CABLE TELEVISION PROPERTIES:
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 45,527,837 41,384,394
Less- accumulated depreciation (19,238,591) (16,361,119)
------------ ------------
26,289,246 25,023,275

Investment in cable television joint venture 585,797 550,483
------------ ------------

Total investment in cable television
properties 26,875,043 25,573,758

DEPOSITS, PREPAID EXPENSES AND DEFERRED CHARGES 398,874 328,988
------------ ------------

Total assets $ 28,153,665 $ 26,514,695
============ ============

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these balance sheets.

23
24
CABLE TV FUND 11-B, LTD.
(A Limited Partnership)

BALANCE SHEETS

December 31,
---------------------------------

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL 1995 1994
--------------------------------- ------------ ------------

LIABILITIES:
Debt $ 23,807,849 $ 20,228,189
Accounts payable-
Trade 16,514 368,624
General Partner - 1,305,421
Accrued liabilities 1,521,748 1,647,247
Subscriber prepayments 51,498 50,293
------------ ------------

Total liabilities 25,397,609 23,599,774
------------ ------------

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 7)

PARTNERS' CAPITAL:
General Partner-
Contributed capital 1,000 1,000
Accumulated earnings 52,221 53,810
------------ ------------

53,221 54,810
------------ ------------

Limited Partners-
Net contributed capital
(38,026 units outstanding at
December 31, 1995 and 1994) 15,661,049 15,661,049
Distributions (19,013,121) (19,013,121)
Accumulated earnings 6,054,907 6,212,183
------------ ------------

2,702,835 2,860,111
------------ ------------

Total liabilities and part
capital $ 28,153,665 $ 26,514,695
============ ============

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these balance sheets.

24
25
CABLE TV FUND 11-B, LTD.
(A Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------------

1995 1994 1993
------------ ----------- -----------

REVENUES $14,366,359 $12,791,832 $11,922,307

COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Operating expenses 8,123,450 7,459,002 7,476,761
Management fees and allocated
overhead from General Partner 1,755,599 1,629,178 1,421,026
Depreciation and amortization 2,957,444 2,379,471 1,899,145
----------- ----------- -----------

OPERATING INCOME 1,529,866 1,324,181 1,125,375
----------- ----------- -----------

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense (1,773,876) (1,126,399) (636,263)
Other, net 49,831 (89,862) (27,631)
----------- ----------- -----------
Total other income
(expense) (1,724,045) (1,216,261) (663,894)
----------- ----------- -----------

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE EQUITY
IN NET INCOME OF CABLE
TELEVISION JOINT VENTURE (194,179) 107,920 461,481

EQUITY IN NET INCOME OF CABLE
TELEVISION JOINT VENTURE 35,314 29,033 19,180
----------- ----------- -----------

NET INCOME (LOSS) $ (158,865) $ 136,953 $ 480,661
=========== =========== ===========

ALLOCATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS):
General Partner $ (1,589) $ 1,370 $ 4,807
=========== =========== ===========
Limited Partners $ (157,276) $ 135,583 $ 475,854
=========== =========== ===========

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP UNIT $ (4.14) $ 3.57 $ 12.51
=========== =========== ===========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP UNITS OUTSTANDING 38,026 38,026 38,026
=========== =========== ===========

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.

25
26
CABLE TV FUND 11-B, LTD.
(A Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL

For the Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------

1995 1994 1993
---------- ---------- ----------

GENERAL PARTNER:
Balance, beginning of year $ 54,810 $ 53,440 $ 48,633
Net income (loss) for year (1,589) 1,370 4,807
---------- ---------- ----------

Balance, end of year $ 53,221 $ 54,810 $ 53,440
========== ========== ==========

LIMITED PARTNERS:
Balance, beginning of year $2,860,111 $2,724,528 $2,248,674
Net income (loss) for year (157,276) 135,583 475,854
---------- ---------- ----------

Balance, end of year $2,702,835 $2,860,111 $2,724,528
========== ========== ==========

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.

26
27
CABLE TV FUND 11-B, LTD.
(A Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------

1995 1994 1993
----------- ----------- -----------

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss) $ (158,865) $ 136,953 $ 480,661
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 2,957,444 2,379,471 1,899,145
Equity in net income of cable
television joint venture (35,314) (29,033) (19,180)
Increase in trade receivables (82,061) (80,298) (82,789)
Increase in deposits, prepaid
expenses and deferred charges (149,858) (148,507) (630,171)
Increase (decrease) in trade accounts
payable, accrued liabilities and
subscriber prepayments (476,404) 115,186 (8,149)
Increase (decrease) in amount due
General Partner (1,305,421) 1,263,133 (135,385)
----------- ----------- -----------

Net cash provided by
operating activities 749,521 3,636,905 1,504,132
----------- ----------- -----------

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment, net (4,143,443) (7,370,516) (7,984,770)
----------- ----------- -----------

Net cash used in investing activities (4,143,443) (7,370,516) (7,984,770)
----------- ----------- -----------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from borrowings 23,978,762 2,815,472 7,544,156
Repayment of debt (20,399,102) (114,093) (79,655)
----------- ----------- -----------

Net cash provided by
financing activities 3,579,660 2,701,379 7,464,501
----------- ----------- -----------

Increase (decrease) in cash 185,738 (1,032,232) 983,863

Cash, beginning of year 139,532 1,171,764 187,901
----------- ----------- -----------

Cash, end of year $ 325,270 $ 139,532 $ 1,171,764
=========== =========== ===========

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURE:
Interest paid $ 1,828,878 $ 916,971 $ 693,276
=========== =========== ===========

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.

27
28
CABLE TV FUND 11-B, LTD.
(A Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) ORGANIZATION AND PARTNERS' INTERESTS

Formation and Business

Cable TV Fund 11-B, Ltd. (the "Partnership"), a Colorado limited
partnership, was formed on June 17, 1983, under a public program sponsored by
Jones Intercable, Inc. The Partnership was formed to acquire, construct,
develop and operate cable television systems. Jones Intercable, Inc.
("Intercable"), a publicly held Colorado corporation, is the "General Partner"
and manager of the Partnership. Intercable and its subsidiaries also own and
operate cable television systems. In addition, Intercable manages cable
television systems for other limited partnerships for which it is general
partner and, also, for affiliated entities.

The Partnership owns and operates the cable television system serving
the municipalities of Lancaster, Lockport and Orchard Park, New York (the "New
York System"). In addition to the New York System, the Partnership owns an 8
percent interest in Cable TV Joint Fund 11 ("Joint Fund 11") through capital
contributions made during 1984 of $3,500,000. Joint Fund 11 owns and operates
the cable television system serving the city of Manitowoc, Wisconsin (the
"Manitowoc System").

Proposed Sales of Cable Television Systems

Upon consummation of the proposed sale of the New York System, the
Partnership will pay all of its indebtedness, which totaled approximately
$23,808,000 at December 31, 1995, its sales tax liability of approximately
$1,750,000 and a brokerage fee of $2,100,000 to The Jones Group, Ltd., a
subsidiary of the General Partner, and then the Partnership will distribute the
approximate $56,047,500 net proceeds to its partners of record as of February
29, 1996. Because limited partners have already received distributions in an
amount equal to 100 percent of the capital initially contributed to the
Partnership by the limited partners, the net proceeds from the New York
System's sale will be distributed 75 percent to the limited partners and 25
percent to the General Partner. Based upon the pro forma financial information
as of December 31, 1995, as a result of the New York System's sale, the limited
partners of the Partnership, as a group, will receive approximately $42,035,600
and the General Partner will receive approximately $14,011,900. Limited
partners will receive $1,105 for each $500 limited partnership interest, or
$2,211 for each $1,000 invested in the Partnership, from the net proceeds of
the New York System's sale. Once the distribution of the net proceeds from the
sale of the New York System has been made, limited partners will have received
a total of $1,605 for each $500 limited partnership interest, or $3,211 for
each $1,000 invested in the Partnership, taking into account distributions to
limited partners made in July 1990 and July 1992. The Partnership will
continue to own its 8 percent interest in the Venture until the Manitowoc
System also is sold. Upon the closing of the sale of the Partnership's New
York System and the Venture's Manitowoc System, the Partnership will be
liquidated and dissolved.

On September 5, 1995, Joint Fund 11 entered into an asset purchase
agreement pursuant to which it agreed to sell the Manitowoc System to the
General Partner for a sales price of $15,735,667, subject to normal working
capital closing adjustments. The closing of the sale of the Manitowoc System
is subject to a number of conditions, including the approval of the holders of
a majority of the limited partnership interests in each of the four
partnerships that comprise Joint Fund 11 in votes to be conducted in 1996 and
the successful renewal and transfer of the Manitowoc System's franchise.

28
29
accordingly will receive 8 percent of such proceeds, estimated to total
approximately $1,432,700. Because limited partners will have already received
distributions in an amount in excess of the capital initially contributed to
the Partnership by the limited partners, the Partnership's portion of the net
proceeds from the Manitowoc System's sale will be distributed 75 percent to the
limited partners and 25 percent to the General Partner. Based upon pro forma
financial information as of December 31, 1995, as a result of the Manitowoc
System's sale, the limited partners of the Partnership, as a group, will
receive approximately $1,074,500 and the General Partner will receive
approximately $358,200. As a result, it is anticipated that the limited
partners will receive approximately $28 for each $500 limited partnership
interest, or approximately $57 for each $1,000 invested in the Partnership,
from the Partnership's portion of the net proceeds of the Manitowoc System's
sale. After the Partnership distributes its portion of the proceeds from the
sale of the Manitowoc System to its partners, the Partnership will be
dissolved and liquidated.

Contributed Capital

The capitalization of the Partnership is set forth in the accompanying
statements of partners' capital. No limited partner is obligated to make any
additional contribution to partnership capital.

Intercable purchased its interest in the Partnership by contributing
$1,000 to partnership capital.

All profits and losses of the Partnership are allocated 99 percent to
the limited partners and 1 percent to Intercable, except for income or gain
from the sale or disposition of cable television properties, which will be
allocated to the partners based upon the formula set forth in the partnership
agreement and interest income earned prior to the first acquisition by the
Partnership of a cable television system, which was allocated 100 percent to
the limited partners.

(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Accounting Records

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on the
accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. The Partnership's tax returns are also prepared on the accrual
basis.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires the General Partner's management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Investment in Cable Television Joint Venture

The Partnership's investment in Joint Fund 11 is accounted for under
the equity method due to the Partnership's influence on Joint Fund 11 as a
general partner. When compared to the December 31, 1994 balance, this
investment has increased by $35,314. This increase represents the
Partnership's proportionate share of income generated by Joint Fund 11 during
1995. The operations of Joint Fund 11 are significant to the Partnership and
should be reviewed in conjunction with these financial statements. Reference
is made to the accompanying financial statements of Joint Fund 11 on pages 35
to 43.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is provided using the
straight-line method over the following estimated service lives:

Cable distribution systems 5-15 years
Equipment and tools 3- 5 years
Buildings 10-31 years
Office furniture and equipment 5 years
Vehicles 3 years

Replacements, renewals and improvements are capitalized and
maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.

29
30
Allocation of Cost of Purchased Cable Television Systems

The Partnership allocated the total contract purchase price of cable
television systems acquired as follows: first, to the fair value of net
tangible assets acquired; second, to the value of subscriber lists; and third,
to franchise costs. Brokerage fees paid to an affiliate of Intercable and
other system acquisition costs were capitalized and charged to distribution
systems.

Revenue Recognition

Subscriber prepayments are initially deferred and recognized as
revenue when earned.

Reclassification

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
1995 presentation.

(3) TRANSACTIONS WITH THE GENERAL PARTNER AND AFFILIATES

Management Fees, Distribution Ratios and Reimbursement

Intercable manages the Partnership and receives a fee for its services
equal to 5 percent of the gross revenues of the Partnership, excluding revenues
from the sale of cable television systems or franchises. For the years ended
December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 management fees paid to Intercable, excluding
the Partnership's 8 percent interest in Joint Fund 11, were $718,318, $639,592,
and $596,115, respectively.

Any partnership distributions made from cash flow (defined as cash
receipts derived from routine operations, less debt principal and interest
payments and cash expenses) are allocated 99 percent to the limited partners
and 1 percent to Intercable. Any distributions other than interest income on
limited partner subscriptions earned prior to the acquisition of the
Partnership's first cable television system or from cash flow, such as from the
sale or refinancing of the system or upon dissolution of the Partnership, will
be made as follows: first, to the limited partners in an amount which,
together with all prior distributions, will equal the amount initially
contributed to the Partnership capital by the limited partners; the balance, 75
percent to the limited partners and 25 percent to Intercable. In July 1990,
$9,153,740 of the limited partners' initial capital contributions was
distributed to the limited partners from funds received from Joint Fund 11. In
July 1992, the remaining amount of limited partners' initial capital
($9,859,381) was distributed to the limited partners from funds received from
the sale of the Grand Island System. Any future distributions will be made 75
percent to the limited partners and 25 percent to Intercable.

The Partnership reimburses Intercable for certain allocated overhead
and administrative expenses. These expenses represent the salaries and related
benefits paid to corporate personnel, rent, data processing services and other
corporate facilities costs. Such personnel provide engineering, marketing,
administrative, accounting, legal and investor relations services to the
Partnership. These reimbursements are limited to 25 percent of the gross
revenues of the Partnership. Allocations of personnel costs are primarily
based upon actual time spent by employees of Intercable with respect to each
partnership managed. Remaining expenses are allocated based on the pro rata
relationship of the Partnership's revenues to the total revenues of all systems
owned or managed by the General Partner and certain of its subsidiaries.
Systems owned by Intercable and all other systems owned by partnerships for
which Intercable is the general partner are also allocated a proportionate
share of these expenses. The General Partner believes that the methodology
used in allocating overhead and administrative expenses is reasonable.
Reimbursements by the Partnership to the General Partner for allocated overhead
and administrative expenses, excluding the Partnership's 8 percent interest in
Joint Fund 11, were $1,037,281, $989,586 and $824,911 for the years ended
December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively.

The Partnership was charged interest during 1995 at an average
interest rate of 10.51 percent on amounts due Intercable, which approximated
Intercable's weighted average cost of borrowings. Total interest charged by
the General Partner to the Partnership was $13,980, $14,287 and $13,350 in
1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively.

30
31
Payments to/from Affiliates for Programming Services

The Partnership receives programming from Superaudio, Mind Extension
University, Jones Computer Network and Product Information Network, all of
which are affiliates of Intercable.

Payments to Superaudio totaled approximately $21,712, $21,977 and
$21,590 in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. Payments to Mind Extension
University totaled approximately $23,227, $19,914 and $12,565 in 1995, 1994 and
1993, respectively. Payments to Jones Computer Network, which initiated
service in 1994, totaled $46,392 and $-0- in 1995 and 1994, respectively.

The Partnership receives a commission from Product Information Network
based on a percentage of advertising revenue and number of subscribers.
Product Information Network, which initiated service in 1994, paid commissions
to the Partnership totaling $38,629 and $186 in 1995 and 1994, respectively.

(4) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 1995 and 1994,
consisted of the following:

1995 1994
------------ ------------

Cable distribution systems $ 38,743,119 $ 34,793,908
Equipment and tools 1,622,222 1,586,646
Office furniture and equipment 501,055 479,991
Buildings 3,612,257 3,441,156
Vehicles 954,764 988,273
Land 94,420 94,420
------------ ------------
45,527,837 41,384,394
Less - accumulated depreciation (19,238,591) (16,361,119)
------------ ------------
$ 26,289,246 $ 25,023,275
============ ============

(5) DEBT

Debt consists of the following:

December 31,
----------------------------

1995 1994
----------- -----------

Lending institutions-

Revolving credit agreement $23,600,000 $20,000,000

Capital lease obligations 207,849 228,189
----------- -----------
$23,807,849 $20,228,189
=========== ===========

On February 28, 1995, the Partnership entered into a $25,000,000
revolving credit and term loan agreement. The revolving credit period expires
January 1, 1997, at which time the outstanding balance converts to a term loan
payable in 24 consecutive quarterly installments commencing March 31, 1997.
Proceeds from this credit facility were used to repay amounts outstanding under
the Partnership's previous credit facility, repay amounts due the General
Partner and fund capital expenditures. As of December 31, 1995, $23,600,000
was outstanding under this agreement, leaving $1,400,000 available for future
needs of the Partnership. Interest payable on outstanding amounts is at the
Partnership's option of the Base Rate plus 1/2 percent or the London InterBank
Offered Rate plus 1-3/8 percent. The effective interest rates on outstanding
obligations as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 were 7.03 percent and 6.77
percent, respectively. This loan is expected to be paid in full upon closing
of the sale of the New York System.

31
32
Installments due on debt principal for each of the five years in the
period ending December 31, 2000 and thereafter, $62,355, $2,894,355,
$3,602,355, $3,796,784, $4,248,000 and $9,204,000. Substantially all of the
Partnership's property, plant and equipment are pledged as security for the
above indebtedness.

At December 31, 1995, the carrying amount of the Partnership's
long-term debt did not differ significantly from the estimated fair value of
the financial instruments. The fair value of the Partnership's long-term debt
is estimated based on the discounted amount of future debt service payments
using rates of borrowing for a liability of similar risk.

(6) INCOME TAXES

Income taxes have not been recorded in the accompanying financial
statements because they accrue directly to the partners. The Federal and state
income tax returns of the Partnership are prepared and filed by Intercable.

The Partnership's tax returns, the qualification of the Partnership as
such for tax purposes, and the amount of distributable income or loss are
subject to examination by Federal and state taxing authorities. If such
examinations result in changes with respect to the Partnership's qualification
as such, or in changes with respect to the Partnership's recorded income or
loss, the tax liability of the general and limited partners would likely be
changed accordingly.

Taxable income reported to the partners is different from that
reported in the statements of operations due to the difference in depreciation
allowed under generally accepted accounting principles and the expense allowed
for tax purposes under the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS).
There are no other significant differences between taxable income or losses and
the net income or losses reported in the statements of operations.

(7) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Partnership has filed cost-of-service showings in response to
rulemakings concerning the 1992 Cable Act for the New York System and thus
anticipates no further reductions in rates in this system. The cost-of-service
showings have not yet received final approvals from regulatory authorities,
however, and there can be no assurance that the Partnership's cost-of-service
showings will prevent further rate reductions in this system until such final
approvals are received.

The Partnership rents office and other facilities under various
long-term lease arrangements. Rent expense paid under such lease arrangements
totaled $9,145, $16,093 and $31,480, respectively, for the years ended December
31, 1995, 1994 and 1993. Minimum commitments under operating leases for the
five years in the period ending December 31, 2000 and thereafter are as
follows:

1996 $7,640
1997 1,424
1998 -
1999 -
2000 -
Thereafter -
------
$9,064
======

32
33
(8) SUPPLEMENTARY PROFIT AND LOSS INFORMATION

Supplementary profit and loss information is presented below:

For the Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------

1995 1994 1993
---------- ---------- ----------

Maintenance and repairs $ 174,344 $ 169,070 $ 223,569
========== ========== ==========

Taxes, other than income and
payroll taxes $ 228,187 $ 175,771 $ 137,070
========== ========== ==========

Advertising $ 98,473 $ 114,475 $ 208,035
========== ========== ==========

Depreciation of property, plant
and equipment $2,957,444 $2,379,471 $1,899,145
========== ========== ==========

Amortization of intangible
assets $ - $ - $ -
========== ========== ==========

33
34

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Partners of Cable TV Joint Fund 11:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of CABLE TV JOINT FUND
11 (a Colorado general partnership) as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the
related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the General Partners' management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cable TV Joint Fund
11 as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995,
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Denver, Colorado,
March 8, 1996.

34
35
CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11
(A General Partnership)

BALANCE SHEETS

December 31,
--------------------------------

ASSETS 1995 1994
------ ----------- -----------

CASH $ 2,984,284 $ 2,429,603

TRADE RECEIVABLES, less allowance for doubtful
receivables of $6,374 and $4,412 at
December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively 133,491 92,110

INVESTMENT IN CABLE TELEVISION PROPERTIES:
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 7,957,720 7,646,689
Less- accumulated depreciation (5,441,063) (5,051,015)
----------- -----------

2,516,657 2,595,674

Franchise costs, net of accumulated amortization
of $1,396,225 and $1,287,891 at
December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively - 108,334
Subscriber lists, net of accumulated amortization
of $257,775 and $237,741 at December 31, 1995
and 1994, respectively - 20,034
----------- -----------

Total investment in cable television
properties 2,516,657 2,724,042

DEPOSITS, PREPAID EXPENSES AND DEFERRED CHARGES 1,869,614 1,853,355
----------- -----------

Total assets $ 7,504,046 $ 7,099,110
=========== ===========

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these balance sheets.

35
36
CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11
(A General Partnership)

BALANCE SHEETS

December 31,
------------------------------------

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL 1995 1994
--------------------------------- -------------- --------------

LIABILITIES:
Capital lease obligations $ 9,917 $ 26,385
Accounts payable-
Trade 612 16,340
Jones Intercable, Inc. 45,258 72,764
Accrued liabilities 381,153 368,106
Subscriber prepayments 15,349 17,670
------------- -------------

Total liabilities 452,289 501,265
------------- -------------

PARTNERS' CAPITAL:
Contributed capital 45,000,000 45,000,000
Distributions (118,914,493) (118,914,493)
Accumulated earnings 80,966,250 80,512,338
------------- -------------

7,051,757 6,597,845
------------- -------------

Total liabilities and
partners' capital $ 7,504,046 $ 7,099,110
============= =============

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these balance sheets.

36
37
CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11
(A General Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------

1995 1994 1993
----------- ---------- ----------

REVENUES $3,632,675 $3,296,103 $3,292,675

COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Operating expenses 2,327,354 2,026,763 1,947,068
Management fees and allocated
expenses from Jones Intercable, Inc. 463,691 437,558 411,577
Depreciation and amortization 545,237 522,593 517,441
---------- ---------- ---------

OPERATING INCOME 296,393 309,189 416,589
---------- ---------- ---------

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense (10,003) (15,716) (22,912)
Interest income 166,280 87,134 101,771
Other, net 1,242 (7,426) (248,912)
---------- ---------- ---------

Total other income (expense), net 157,519 63,992 (170,053)
---------- ---------- ---------

NET INCOME $ 453,912 $ 373,181 $ 246,536
========== ========== =========

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.

37
38
CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11
(A General Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL

For the Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------

1995 1994 1993
---------- --------- ----------

CABLE TV FUND 11-A, LTD. (18%):
Balance, beginning of year $1,231,800 $1,163,806 $1,118,887
Net income for year 82,703 67,994 44,919
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance, end of year $1,314,503 $1,231,800 $1,163,806
---------- ---------- ----------

CABLE TV FUND 11-B, LTD. (8%):
Balance, beginning of year $ 550,483 $ 521,450 $ 502,270
Net income for year 35,314 29,033 19,180
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance, end of year $ 585,797 $ 550,483 $ 521,450
---------- ---------- ----------

CABLE TV FUND 11-C, LTD. (27%):
Balance, beginning of year $2,316,337 $2,215,168 $2,148,332
Net income for year 123,056 101,169 66,836
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance, end of year $2,439,393 $2,316,337 $2,215,168
---------- ---------- ----------

CABLE TV FUND 11-D, LTD. (47%):
Balance, beginning of year $2,499,225 $2,324,240 $2,208,639
Net income for year 212,839 174,985 115,601
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance, end of year $2,712,064 $2,499,225 $2,324,240
---------- ---------- ----------

TOTAL:
Balance, beginning of year $6,597,845 $6,224,664 $5,978,128
Net income for year 453,912 373,181 246,536
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance, end of year $7,051,757 $6,597,845 $6,224,664
========== ========== ==========

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.

38
39
CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11
(A General Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------

1995 1994 1993
----------- ----------- -----------

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 453,912 $ 373,181 $ 246,536
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 545,237 522,593 517,441
Increase in trade receivables (41,381) (41,640) (14,686)
Increase in deposits, prepaid
expenses and deferred charges (43,080) (1,372) (1,625)
Increase (decrease) in trade accounts
payable, accrued liabilities and
subscriber prepayments (5,002) 69,592 (331,331)
Increase (decrease) in amount due Jones Intercable, Inc. (27,506) 39,939 (19,920)
---------- ---------- -----------

Net cash provided by operating activities 882,180 962,293 396,415
---------- ---------- -----------

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment, net (311,031) (379,930) (248,223)
Franchise renewal deposit - - (1,850,000)
---------- ---------- -----------

Net cash used in investing activities (311,031) (379,930) (2,098,223)
---------- ---------- -----------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from borrowings - 18,264 -
Repayment of debt (16,468) (12,008) (9,059)
---------- ---------- -----------

Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities (16,468) 6,256 (9,059)
---------- ---------- -----------

Increase (decrease) in cash 554,681 588,619 (1,710,867)

Cash, beginning of year 2,429,603 1,840,984 3,551,851
---------- ---------- -----------

Cash, end of year $2,984,284 $2,429,603 $ 1,840,984
========== ========== ===========

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURE:
Interest paid $ 10,003 $ 15,716 $ 22,912
========== ========== ===========

The accompanying notes to financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.

39
40
CABLE TV JOINT FUND 11
(A General Partnership)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) ORGANIZATION AND PARTNERS' INTERESTS

Formation and Business

Cable TV Joint Fund 11 ("Joint Fund 11"), a Colorado general
partnership, was formed on February 1, 1984, through a joint venture agreement
made by and among Cable TV Fund 11-A, Ltd. ("Fund 11-A"), Cable TV Fund 11-B,
Ltd. ("Fund 11-B"), Cable TV Fund 11-C, Ltd. ("Fund 11-C") and Cable TV Fund
11-D, Ltd ("Fund 11-D"), all Colorado limited partnerships (the "Joint Venture
Partners"). Joint Fund 11 was formed to acquire, construct, develop and
operate cable television systems. Joint Fund 11 owns and operates the cable
television system serving the areas in and around the city of Manitowoc,
Wisconsin (the "Manitowoc System"). Jones Intercable, Inc. ("Intercable"), who
is the "General Partner" of each of the Joint Venture Partners, manages Joint
Fund 11. Intercable and its subsidiaries also own and operate other cable
television systems. In addition, Intercable manages cable television systems
for other limited partnerships for which it is general partner and, also, for
affiliated entities.

Proposed Sale of Cable Television System

On September 5, 1995, Joint Fund 11 entered into an asset purchase
agreement pursuant to which it agreed to sell the Manitowoc System to the
General Partner for a sales price of $15,735,667, subject to normal working
capital closing adjustments. This sales price is the average of three separate
independent appraisals of the fair market value of the Manitowoc System and the
General Partner's offer was the only bid tendered in a public bidding process
for the Manitowoc System. The General Partner assigned its rights and
obligations under the asset purchase agreement to Jones Cable Holdings, Inc.
("JCH"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the General Partner. The closing of the
sale will occur on a date upon which Joint Fund 11 and JCH mutually agree by
September 30, 1996. The sale of the Manitowoc System is subject to a number of
conditions, including approval of the transaction by the holders of a majority
of the Partnership's limited partnership interests and approvals from
governmental authorities and other third parties necessary to the transfer of
the Manitowoc System. If all conditions precedent to JCH's obligation to
close are not eventually satisfied or waived, JCH's obligation to purchase the
Manitowoc System will terminate on September 30, 1996.

Contributed Capital, Sharing Ratios and Distribution

The capitalization of Joint Fund 11 is set forth in the accompanying
statements of partners' capital. Profits and losses of Joint Fund 11 are
allocated to the partners in proportion to their respective partnership
interests.

40
41
All partnership distributions, including those made from cash flow
(defined as cash receipts derived from routine operations, less debt principal
and interest payments and cash expenses), from the sale or refinancing of
partnership property and on dissolution of Joint Fund 11, are made to the
partners also in proportion to their approximate respective interests in Joint
Fund 11 as follows:

Cable TV Fund 11-A, Ltd. 18%
Cable TV Fund 11-B, Ltd. 8%
Cable TV Fund 11-C, Ltd. 27%
Cable TV Fund 11-D, Ltd. 47%
---
100%
===

(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Accounting Records

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on the
accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. Joint Fund 11's tax returns are also prepared on the accrual
basis.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Depreciation is determined using the straight-line method over the
following estimated service lives:

Cable distribution systems 5-15 years
Equipment and tools 3-5 years
Buildings 20 years
Office furniture and equipment 5 years
Vehicles 3 years

Replacements, renewals and improvements are capitalized and
maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.

Intangible Assets

Costs assigned to franchises and subscriber lists were amortized using
the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives.

Revenue Recognition

Subscriber prepayments are initially deferred and recognized as
revenue when earned.

(3) TRANSACTIONS WITH JONES INTERCABLE, INC. AND AFFILIATES

Management Fees and Reimbursements

Intercable manages Joint Fund 11 and receives a fee for its services
equal to 5 percent of the gross revenues, excluding revenues from the sale of
the cable television systems or franchises. Management fees paid to Intercable
during 1995, 1994 and 1993 were $181,634, $164,805 and $164,634, respectively.

Intercable is reimbursed for certain allocated overhead and
administrative expenses. These expenses represent the salaries and related
benefits paid to corporate personnel, rent, data processing services and other
corporate facilities costs.

41
42
Such personnel provide engineering, marketing, administrative, accounting,
legal and investor relations services to Joint Fund 11. Allocations of
personnel costs are primarily based upon actual time spent by employees of
Intercable with respect to each partnership managed. Remaining expenses are
allocated based on the pro rata relationship of the Partnership's revenues to
the total revenues of all systems owned or managed by Intercable and certain of
its subsidiaries. Systems owned by Intercable and all other systems owned by
partnerships for which Intercable is the general partner are also allocated a
proportionate share of these expenses. Intercable believes that the
methodology used in allocating overhead and administrative expenses is
reasonable. The amount of allocated overhead and administrative expenses
charged to Joint Fund 11 during 1995, 1994 and 1993 was $282,057, $272,753 and
$246,943, respectively.

Joint Fund 11 was charged interest during 1995 at an average interest
rate of 10.5 percent on the amounts due Intercable, which approximated
Intercable's weighted average cost of borrowings. Total interest charged
during 1995, 1994 and 1993 was $6,848, $13,306 and $21,071, respectively.

Payments to/from Affiliates for Programming Services

Joint Fund 11 receives programming from Superaudio, Mind Extension
University, Jones Computer Network and Product Information Network, all of
which are affiliates of Intercable.

Payments to Superaudio totaled $6,318, $6,105 and $6,040 in 1995, 1994
and 1993, respectively. Payments to Mind Extension University totaled $6,759,
$5,532 and $3,515 in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. Payments to Jones
Computer Network, which initiated service in 1994, totaled $12,760 and $3,316
in 1995 and 1994, respectively.

Joint Fund 11 receives a commission from Product Information Network
based on a percentage of advertising revenue and number of subscribers. Product
Information Network, which initiated service in 1994, paid commissions to Joint
Fund 11 totaling $4,559 and $510 in 1995 and 1994, respectively.

(4) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 1995 and 1994,
consisted of the following:

1995 1994
----------- ------------

Cable distribution systems $ 7,279,475 $ 6,957,103
Equipment and tools 259,414 249,348
Office furniture and equipment 147,163 146,463
Buildings 113,431 113,431
Vehicles 158,237 180,344
----------- ------------

7,957,720 7,646,689
Less - accumulated depreciation (5,441,063) (5,051,015)
----------- ------------

$ 2,516,657 $ 2,595,674
=========== ============

(5) DEBT

Debt consists of capital lease obligations with maturities of 1 to 4
years. Installments due on debt principal for the five years in the period
ending December 31, 2000, respectively, are: $2,776, $2,776, $2,776, $1,589,
and $-0-.

(6) INCOME TAXES

Income taxes have not been recorded in the accompanying financial
statements because they accrue to the partners of Funds 11-A, 11-B, 11-C and
11-D, which are general partners in Joint Fund 11.

Joint Fund 11's tax returns, the qualification of the Partnership as
such for tax purposes, and the amount of distributable partnership income or
loss are subject to examination by federal and state taxing authorities. If
such examinations result in changes with respect to the Joint

42
43
Fund 11's qualification as such, or in changes with respect to Joint Fund 11's
recorded income or loss, the tax liability of the general and limited partners
would likely be changed accordingly.

Taxable income reported to the partners is different from that
reported in the statements of operations due to the difference in depreciation
allowed under generally accepted accounting principles and the expense allowed
for tax purposes under the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS).
There are no other significant differences between taxable income and the net
income reported in the statements of operations.

(7) SUPPLEMENTARY PROFIT AND LOSS INFORMATION

Supplementary profit and loss information is presented below:

Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------

1995 1994 1993
-------- -------- --------

Maintenance and repairs $ 27,102 $ 41,329 $ 34,813
======== ======== ========

Taxes, other than income and
payroll taxes $124,403 $ 52,294 $ 57,152
======== ======== ========

Advertising $ 62,160 $ 81,763 $ 56,930
======== ======== ========

Depreciation of property,
plant and equipment $416,869 $379,817 $374,665
======== ======== ========

Amortization of intangible assets $128,368 $142,776 $142,776
======== ======== ========

43
44
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

PART III.

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The Partnership itself has no officers or directors. Certain information
concerning the directors and executive officers of the General Partner is set
forth below.

Glenn R. Jones 66 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Derek H. Burney 56 Vice Chairman of the Board
James B. O'Brien 46 President and Director
Ruth E. Warren 46 Group Vice President/Operations
Kevin P. Coyle 44 Group Vice President/Finance
Christopher J. Bowick 40 Group Vice President/Technology
George H. Newton 61 Group Vice President/Telecommunications
Timothy J. Burke 45 Group Vice President/Taxation/Administration
Raymond L. Vigil 49 Group Vice President/Human Resources and Director
Cynthia A. Winning 44 Group Vice President/Marketing
Elizabeth M. Steele 44 Vice President/General Counsel/Secretary
Larry W. Kaschinske 36 Controller
Robert E. Cole 63 Director
William E. Frenzel 67 Director
Donald L. Jacobs 57 Director
James J. Krejci 54 Director
John A. MacDonald 42 Director
William E. Frenzel 67 Director
Raphael M. Solot 62 Director
Daniel E. Somers 48 Director
Howard O. Thrall 48 Director
Robert B. Zoellick 42 Director

Mr. Glenn R. Jones has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner since its formation in 1970, and
he was President from June 1984 until April 1988. Mr. Jones is the sole
shareholder, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Jones
International, Ltd. He is also Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
subsidiaries of the General Partner and of certain other affiliates of the
General Partner. Mr. Jones has been involved in the cable television business in
various capacities since 1961, is a past and present member of the Board of
Directors and the Executive Committee of the National Cable Television
Association. He also is on the Executive Committee of Cable in the Classroom, an
organization dedicated to education via cable. Additionally, in March 1991, Mr.
Jones was appointed to the Board of Governors for the American Society for
Training and Development, and in November 1992 to the Board of Education Council
of the National Alliance of Business. Mr. Jones is also a founding member of the
James Madison Council of the Library of Congress. Mr. Jones is a past director
and member of the Executive Committee of C-Span. Mr. Jones has been the
recipient of several awards including the Grand Tam Award in 1989, the highest
award from the Cable Television Administration and Marketing Society; the
Chairman's Award from the Investment Partnership Association, which is an
association of sponsors of public syndications; the cable television industry's
Public Affairs Association President's Award in 1990, the Donald G. McGannon
award for the advancement of minorities and women in cable; the STAR Award from
American Women in Radio and Television, Inc. for exhibition of a commitment to
the issues and concerns of women in television and radio; the Women in Cable
Accolade in 1990 in recognition of support of this organization; the Most
Outstanding Corporate

44
45
Individual Achievement award from the International Distance Learning
Conference; the Golden Plate Award from the American Academy of Achievement for
his advances in distance education; the Man of the Year named by the Denver
chapter of the Achievement Rewards for College Scientists; and in 1994 Mr. Jones
was inducted into Broadcasting and Cable's Hall of Fame.

Mr. Derek H. Burney was appointed a Director of the General Partner on
December 20, 1994 and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors on January 31,
1995. Mr. Burney joined BCE Inc., Canada's largest telecommunications company,
in January 1993 as Executive Vice President, International. He has been the
Chairman of Bell Canada International Inc., a subsidiary of BCE, since January
1993 and, in addition, has been Chief Executive Officer of BCI since July 1993.
Prior to joining BCE, Mr. Burney served as Canada's ambassador to the United
States from 1989 to 1992. Mr. Burney also served as chief of staff to the Prime
Minister of Canada from March 1987 to January 1989 where he was directly
involved with the negotiation of the U.S. - Canada Free Trade Agreement. In July
1993, he was named an Officer of the Order of Canada. Mr. Burney is chairman of
Bell Cablemedia plc. He is a director of Mercury Communications Limited,
Videotron Holdings plc, Tele-Direct (Publications) Inc., Teleglobe Inc., Bimcor
Inc., Maritime Telegraph and Telephone Company, Limited, Moore Corporation
Limited and Northbridge Programming Inc.

Mr. James B. O'Brien, the General Partner's President, joined the General
Partner in January 1982. Prior to being elected President and a Director of the
General Partner in December 1989, Mr. O'Brien served as a Division Manager,
Director of Operations Planning/Assistant to the CEO, Fund Vice President and
Group Vice President/Operations. Mr. O'Brien was appointed to the General
Partner's Executive Committee in August 1993. As President, he is responsible
for the day-to-day operations of the cable television systems managed and owned
by the General Partner. Mr. O'Brien is a board member of Cable Labs, Inc., the
research arm of the U.S. cable television industry. He also serves as a director
of the Cable Television Administration and Marketing Association and as a
director of the Walter Kaitz Foundation, a foundation that places people of
ethnic minority groups in positions with cable television systems, networks and
vendor companies.

Ms. Ruth E. Warren joined the General Partner in August 1980 and has served
in various operational capacities, including system manager and Fund Vice
President, since then. Ms. Warren was elected Group Vice President/Operations of
the General Partner in September 1990.

Mr. Kevin P. Coyle joined The Jones Group, Ltd. in July 1981 as Vice
President/Financial Services. In September 1985, he was appointed Senior Vice
President/Financial Services. He was elected Treasurer of the General Partner in
August 1987, Vice President/Treasurer in April 1988 and Group Vice
President/Finance and Chief Financial Officer in October 1990.

Mr. Christopher J. Bowick joined the General Partner in September 1991 as
Group Vice President/Technology and Chief Technical Officer. Previous to joining
the General Partner, Mr. Bowick worked for Scientific Atlanta's Transmission
Systems Business Division in various technical management capacities since 1981,
and as Vice President of Engineering since 1989.

Mr. George H. Newton joined the General Partner in January 1996 as Group
Vice President/Telecommunications. Prior to joining the General Partner, Mr.
Newton was President of his own consulting business, Clear Solutions, and since
1994 Mr. Newton has served as a Senior Advisor to Bell Canada International.
From 1990 to 1993, Mr. Newton served as the founding Chief Executive Officer and
Managing Director of Clear Communications, New Zealand, where he established an
alternative telephone company in New Zealand. From 1964 to 1990, Mr. Newton held
a wide variety of operational and business assignments with Bell Canada
International.

Mr. Timothy J. Burke joined the General Partner in August 1982 as corporate
tax manager, was elected Vice President/Taxation in November 1986 and Group Vice
President/Taxation/Administration in October 1990.

Mr. Raymond L. Vigil joined the General Partner in June 1993 as Group Vice
President/Human Resources. Previous to joining the General Partner, Mr. Vigil
served as Executive Director of Learning with

45
46
USWest. Prior to USWest, Mr. Vigil worked in various human resources posts over
a 14-year term with the IBM Corporation.

Ms. Cynthia A. Winning joined the General Partner as Group Vice
President/Marketing in December 1994. Previous to joining the General Partner,
Ms. Winning served since 1994 as the President of PRS Inc., Denver, Colorado, a
sports and event marketing company. From 1979 to 1981 and from 1986 to 1994, Ms.
Winning served as the Vice President and Director of Marketing for Citicorp
Retail Services, Inc., a provider of private-label credit cards for ten national
retail department store chains. From 1981 to 1986, Ms. Winning was the Director
of Marketing Services for Daniels & Associates cable television operations, as
well as the Western Division Marketing Director for Capital Cities Cable. Ms.
Winning also serves as a board member of Cities in Schools, a dropout
intervention/prevention program.

Ms. Elizabeth M. Steele joined the General Partner in August 1987 as Vice
President/General Counsel and Secretary. From August 1980 until joining the
General Partner, Ms. Steele was an associate and then a partner at the Denver
law firm of Davis, Graham & Stubbs, which serves as counsel to the General
Partner.

Mr. Larry Kaschinske joined the General Partner in 1984 as a staff
accountant in the General Partner's former Wisconsin Division, was promoted to
Assistant Controller in 1990 and named Controller in August 1994.

Mr. Robert E. Cole was appointed a Director of the General Partner in March
1996. Mr. Cole is currently self-employed as a partner of First Variable
Insurance Marketing and is responsible for marketing to National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. firms in northern California, Oregon, Washington and
Alaska. From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Cole was the Director of Marketing for Lamar Life
Insurance Company; from 1992 to 1993, Mr. Cole was Senior Vice President of PMI
Inc., a third party lender serving the special needs of Corporate Owned Life
Insurance (COLI) and from 1988 to 1992, Mr. Cole was the principal and
co-founder of a specialty investment banking firm that provided services to
finance the ownership and growth of emerging companies, productive assets and
real property. Mr. Cole is a Certified Financial Planner and a former United
States Naval Aviator.

Mr. William E. Frenzel was appointed a Director of the General Partner on
April 11, 1995. Mr. Frenzel has been a Guest Scholar since 1991 with the
Brookings Institution, a research organization located in Washington D. C. Until
his retirement in January 1991, Mr. Frenzel served for twenty years in the
United States House of Representatives, representing the State of Minnesota,
where he was a member of the House Ways and Means Committee and its Trade
Subcommittee, the Congressional Representative to the General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade (GATT), the Ranking Minority Member on the House Budget
Committee and a member of the National Economic Commission. Mr. Frenzel also
served in the Minnesota Legislature for eight years. He is a Distinguished
Fellow of the Tax Foundation, Vice Chairman of the Eurasia Foundation, a Board
Member of the U.S.-Japan Foundation, the Close-Up Foundation, Sit Mutual Funds
and Chairman of the Japan-America Society of Washington.

Mr. Donald L. Jacobs was appointed a Director of the General Partner on
April 11, 1995. Mr. Jacobs is a retired executive officer of TRW. Prior to his
retirement, he was Vice President and Deputy Manager of the Space and Defense
Sector; prior to that appointment, he was the Vice President and General Manager
of the Defense Systems Group and prior to his appointment as Group General
Manager, he was President of ESL, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of TRW. During
his career, Mr. Jacobs served on several corporate, professional and civic
boards.

Mr. James J. Krejci was President of the International Division of
International Gaming Technology, International headquartered in Reno, Nevada,
until March 1995. Prior to joining IGT in May 1994, Mr. Krejci was Group Vice
President of Jones International, Ltd. and was Group Vice President of the
General Partner. He also served as an officer of Jones Futurex, Inc., a
subsidiary of the General Partner engaged in manufacturing and marketing data
encryption devices, Jones Interactive, Inc., a subsidiary of Jones
International, Ltd. providing computer data and billing processing facilities
and Jones Lightwave, Ltd., a company owned by Jones International, Ltd. and Mr.
Jones, and several of its subsidiaries engaged in the provision of
telecommunications

46
47
services until leaving the General Partner in May 1994. Mr. Krejci has been a
Director of the General Partner since August 1987.

Mr. John A. MacDonald was appointed a Director of the General Partner on
November 8, 1995. Mr. MacDonald is Executive Vice President of Business
Development and Chief Technology Officer of Bell Canada International Inc. Prior
to joining Bell Canada in November 1994, Mr. MacDonald was President and Chief
Executive Officer of The New Brunswick Telephone Company, Limited, a post he had
held since March of that year. Prior to March 1994, Mr. MacDonald was with NBTel
for 17 years serving in various capacities, including Market Planning Manager,
Corporate Planning Manager, Manager of Systems Planning and Development and
General Manager, Chief Engineer and General Manager of Engineering and
Information Systems and Vice President of Planning. Mr. MacDonald was the former
Chairman of the New Brunswick section of the Institute of Electrical and
Electronic Engineers and also served on the Federal Government's Information
Highway Advisory Council. Mr. MacDonald is Chairman of MediaLinx Interactive
Inc. and Stentor Canadian Network Management and is presently a Governor of the
Montreal Exchange. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Tele-Direct
(Publications) Inc., Bell-Northern Research, Ltd., SRCI, Bell Sygma, Canarie
Inc., and is a member of the University of New Brunswick Venture Campaign
Cabinet.

Mr. Raphael M. Solot was appointed a Director of the General Partner in
March 1996. Mr. Solot is an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of
Colorado. Mr. Solot has practiced law in the State of Colorado as a sole
practitioner since obtaining his Juris Doctor degree from the University of
Colorado in 1964.

Mr. Daniel E. Somers was initially appointed a Director of the General
Partner on December 20, 1994. Mr. Somers resigned as a Director on December 31,
1995, at the time he was elected Chief Executive Officer of Bell Cablemedia. Mr.
Somers was reinstated as a Director of the General Partner on February 2, 1996.
From January 1992 to January 1995, Mr. Somers worked as senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of Bell Canada International Inc. and was appointed
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on February 1, 1995. He is
also a Director of certain of its affiliates. Mr. Somers currently serves as
Chief Executive Officer of Bell Cablemedia. Prior to joining Bell Canada
International Inc. and since January 1989, Mr. Somers was the President and
Chief Executive Officer of Radio Atlantic Holdings Limited. Mr. Somers is a
member of the North American Society of Corporate Planning, the Financial
Executives Institution and the Financial Analysts Federation.

Mr. Howard O. Thrall was appointed a Director of the General Partner on
March 6, 1996. Mr. Thrall had previously served as a Director of the General
Partner from December 1988 to December 1994. Since September 1993, Mr. Thrall
has served as Vice President of Sales, Asian Region, for World Airways, Inc.
From 1984 until August 1993, Mr. Thrall was with the McDonnell Douglas
Corporation, where he concluded as a Regional Vice President, Commercial
Marketing with the Douglas Aircraft Company subsidiary. Mr. Thrall is also a
management and international marketing consultant, having completed assignments
with First National Net, Inc., Cheong Kang Associated (Korea), Aero Investment
Alliance, Inc. and Western Real Estate Partners.

Mr. Robert B. Zoellick was appointed a Director of the General Partner on
April 11, 1995. Mr. Zoellick is Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary of Fannie Mae, a federally chartered and stockholder-owned
corporation that is the largest housing finance investor in the United States.
From August 1992 to January 1993, Mr. Zoellick served as Deputy Chief of Staff
of the White House and Assistant to the President. From May 1991 to August 1992,
Mr. Zoellick served concurrently as the Under Secretary of State for Economic
and Agricultural Affairs and as Counselor of the Department of State, a post he
assumed in March 1989. From 1985 to 1988, Mr. Zoellick served at the Department
of Treasury in a number of capacities, including Counselor to the Secretary. Mr.
Zoellick received the Alexander Hamilton and Distinguished Service Awards,
highest honors of the Departments of Treasury and State, respectively. The
German Government awarded him the Knight Commanders Cross for his work on
Germany unification. Mr. Zoellick currently serves on the boards of the Council
on Foreign Relations, the Congressional Institute, the German Marshall Fund of
the U.S., the European Institute, the National Bureau of Asian Research, the
American Council on Germany and the Overseas Development Council.

47
48
Christopher J. Bowick, Cynthia A. Winning and Larry W. Kaschinske are
executive officers of the General Partner; Raymond L. Vigil is an executive
officer and a director of the General Partner; and Derek H. Burney, John A.
MacDonald and Daniel E. Somers are directors of the General Partner. Reports by
these persons with respect to the ownership of limited partnership interests in
the Partnership required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, were not filed within the required time. None of these
individuals own any limited partnership interests in the Partnership.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Partnership has no employees; however, various personnel are required
to operate the cable television systems owned by the Partnership and the
Venture. Such personnel are employed by the General Partner and, the cost of
such employment is charged by the General Partner to the Partnership or the
Venture as a direct reimbursement item. See Item 13.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGERS

No person or entity owns more than 5 percent of the limited partnership
interests of the Partnership.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The General Partner and its affiliates engage in certain transactions with
the Partnership and the Venture. The General Partner believes that the terms of
such transactions are generally as favorable as could be obtained by the
Partnership or the Venture from unaffiliated parties. This determination has
been made by the General Partner in good faith, but none of the terms were or
will be negotiated at arm's-length and there can be no assurance that the terms
of such transactions have been or will be as favorable as those that could have
been obtained by the Partnership or the Venture from unaffiliated parties.

The General Partner charges a management fee, and the General Partner is
reimbursed for certain allocated overhead and administrative expenses. These
expenses represent the salaries and benefits paid to corporate personnel, rent,
data processing services and other corporate facilities costs. Such personnel
provide engineering, marketing, administrative, accounting, legal and investor
relations services to the Partnership and the Venture. Allocations of personnel
costs are based primarily on actual time spent by employees of the General
Partner with respect to each partnership managed. Remaining expenses are
allocated based on the pro rata relationship of the Partnership's revenues to
the total revenues of all systems owned or managed by the General Partner and
certain of its subsidiaries. Systems owned by the General Partner and all other
systems owned by partnerships for which Jones Intercable, Inc. is the general
partner, are also allocated a proportionate share of these expenses.

The General Partner also advances funds and charges interest on the balance
payable. The interest rate charged approximates the General Partner's weighted
average cost of borrowing.

The Systems receive stereo audio programming from Superaudio, a joint
venture owned 50% by an affiliate of the General Partner and 50% by an
unaffiliated party, educational video programming from Mind Extension
University, Inc., an affiliate of the General Partner, and computer video
programming from Jones Computer Network, Ltd., an affiliate of the General
Partner, for fees based upon the number of subscribers receiving the
programming.

Product Information Network ("PIN"), an affiliate of the General Partner,
provides advertising time for third parties on the Systems. In consideration,
the revenues generated from the third parties are shared between PIN and the
Partnership and the Venture. During the year ended December 31, 1995, the
Partnership received revenues from PIN of $38,629, and the Venture received
revenues from PIN of $4,559.

48
49
The charges to the Partnership and the Venture for related party
transactions are as follows for the periods indicated:

At December 31,
---------------
Cable TV Fund 11-B 1995 1994 1993
- ------------------ ---------- ---------- ----------

Management fees $ 718,318 $ 639,592 $ 596,115
Allocation of expenses 1,037,281 989,586 824,911
Interest on advances paid to the General Partner 13,980 14,287 13,350
Amount of advances outstanding -0- 1,305,421 42,288
Highest amount of advances outstanding 109,264 1,305,421 177,673
Programming fees:
Superaudio 21,712 21,977 21,590
Mind Extension University 23,227 19,914 12,565
Jones Computer Network 46,392 -0- -0-

At December 31,
---------------
Cable TV Joint Fund 11 1995 1994 1993
- ---------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Management fees $ 181,634 $ 164,805 $ 164,634
Allocation of expenses 282,057 272,753 246,943
Interest on advances paid to the General Partner 6,848 13,306 21,071
Amount of advances outstanding 45,258 72,764 32,825
Highest amount of advances outstanding 77,215 72,764 52,745
Programming fees:
Superaudio 6,318 6,105 6,040
Mind Extension University 6,759 5,532 3,515
Jones Computer Network 12,760 3,316 -0-

49
50
PART IV.

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) 1. See index to financial statements for the list of financial
statements and exhibits thereto filed as part of this report.

3. The following exhibits are filed herewith.

2.1 Asset Purchase Agreement dated September 5, 1995 between Cable TV
Joint Fund 11 and Jones Intercable, Inc. relating to the
Manitowoc System. (1)

2.2 Purchase and Sale Agreement dated October 6, 1995 among Cable TV
Fund 11-B, Ltd., Jones Intercable, Inc. and Global Acquisition
Partners, L.P.

4.1 Limited Partnership Agreement of Cable TV Fund 11-B, Ltd. (2)

10.1.1 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto granting a
community antenna television system franchise for the City of
Manitowoc, Wisconsin. (Joint Fund 11) (2)

10.1.2 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto granting a
community antenna television system franchise for Barker, New
York. (Fund 11-B) (3)

10.1.3 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto granting a
community antenna television system franchise for the Town of
Clarence, New York. (Fund 11-B)

10.1.4 Copy of order renewing franchise adopted 12/11/91. (Fund 11-B)
(4)

10.1.5 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto granting a
community antenna television system franchise for the Town of
Cheektowaga, New York. (Fund 11-B) (5)

10.1.6 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto granting a
community antenna television system franchise for the Town of
Elma, New York. (Fund 11-B) (2)

10.1.7 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto granting a
community antenna television system franchise for the Town of
Lancaster, New York. (Fund 11-B)

10.1.8 Copy of renewal order adopted 12/11/91. (Fund 11-B) (4)

10.1.9 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto granting a
community antenna television system franchise for the Village of
Lancaster, New York. (Fund 11-B) (2)

10.1.10 Copy of renewal order adopted 5/4/88. (Fund 11-B) (4)

10.1.11 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto granting a
community antenna television system franchise for the City of
Lockport, New York. (Fund 11-B) (4)

10.1.12 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto granting a
community antenna television system franchise for the Town of
Newfane, New York. (Fund 11-B) (2)

10.1.13 Copy of renewal order adopted 12/11/91. (Fund 11-B) (4)

50
51
10.1.14 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto granting a
community antenna television system franchise for the Town and
Village of Orchard Park, New York. (Fund 11-B)

10.1.15 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto granting a
community antenna television system franchise for Somerset, New
York. (Fund 11-B) (3)

10.2.1 Copy of Credit Agreement dated as of February 28, 1995 among the
Registrant, various financial institutions as lenders and Shawmut
Bank Connecticut, N.A., as agent for the lenders

27 Financial Data Schedule

(1) Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report on Form 8-K
dated September 8, 1995.

(2) Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1985.

(2) Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1989.

(3) Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1992.

(4) Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1990.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
None.

51
52
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CABLE TV FUND 11-B, LTD.
a Colorado limited partnership
By: Jones Intercable, Inc.

By: /s/ Glenn R. Jones
-------------------------------
Glenn R. Jones
Chairman of the Board and Chief
Dated: March 25, 1996 Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By: /s/ Glenn R. Jones
-------------------------------
Glenn R. Jones
Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
Dated: March 25, 1996 (Principal Executive Officer)

By: /s/ Kevin P. Coyle
-------------------------------
Kevin P. Coyle
Group Vice President/Finance
Dated: March 25, 1996 (Principal Financial Officer)

By: /s/ Larry Kaschinske
-------------------------------
Larry Kaschinske
Controller
Dated: March 25, 1996 (Principal Accounting Officer)

By: /s/ James B. O'Brien
-------------------------------
James B. O'Brien
Dated: March 25, 1996 President and Director

By: /s/ Raymond L. Vigil
-------------------------------
Raymond L. Vigil
Dated: March 25, 1996 Group Vice President and Director

By: /s/ Derek H. Burney
---------------------------------
Derek H. Burney
Dated: March 25, 1996 Director

52
53
By:
---------------------------------
Robert E. Cole
Dated: Director

By: /s/ William E. Frenzel
---------------------------------
William E. Frenzel
Dated: March 25, 1996 Director

By: /s/ Donald L. Jacobs
---------------------------------
Donald L. Jacobs
Dated: March 25, 1996 Director

By: /s/ James J. Krejci
---------------------------------
James J. Krejci
Dated: March 25, 1996 Director

By: /s/ John A. MacDonald
---------------------------------
John A. MacDonald
Dated: March 25, 1996 Director

By:
---------------------------------
Raphael M. Solot
Dated: Director

By: /s/ Daniel E. Somers
---------------------------------
Daniel E. Somers
Dated: March 25, 1996 Director

By: /s/ Howard O. Thrall
---------------------------------
Howard O. Thrall
Dated: March 25, 1996 Director

By: /s/ Robert B. Zoellick
---------------------------------
Robert B. Zoellick
Dated: March 25, 1996 Director

53
54
EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number Exhibit Description Page
- ------- ------------------- ----

2.1 Asset Purchase Agreement dated September 5, 1995
between Cable TV Joint Fund 11 and Jones Intercable,
Inc. relating to the Manitowoc System. (1)

2.2 Purchase and Sale Agreement dated October 6, 1995
among Cable TV Fund 11-B, Ltd., Jones Intercable,
Inc. and Global Acquisition Partners, L.P.

4.1 Limited Partnership Agreement of Cable TV Fund 11-B,
Ltd. (2)

10.1.1 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto
granting a community antenna television system
franchise for the City of Manitowoc, Wisconsin.
(Joint Fund 11) (2)

10.1.2 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto
granting a community antenna television system
franchise for Barker, New York. (Fund 11-B) (3)

10.1.3 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto
granting a community antenna television system
franchise for the Town of Clarence, New York. (Fund
11-B)

10.1.4 Copy of order renewing franchise adopted 12/11/91.
(Fund 11-B) (4)

10.1.5 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto
granting a community antenna television system
franchise for the Town of Cheektowaga, New York.
(Fund 11-B) (5)

10.1.6 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto
granting a community antenna television system
franchise for the Town of Elma, New York. (Fund
11-B) (2)

10.1.7 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto
granting a community antenna television system
franchise for the Town of Lancaster, New York. (Fund
11-B)

10.1.8 Copy of renewal order adopted 12/11/91. (Fund 11-B)
(4)

10.1.9 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto
granting a community antenna television system
franchise for the Village of Lancaster, New York.
(Fund 11-B) (2)

10.1.10 Copy of renewal order adopted 5/4/88. (Fund 11-B)
(4)

10.1.11 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto
granting a community antenna television system
franchise for the City of Lockport, New York. (Fund
11-B) (4)

10.1.12 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto
granting a community antenna television system
franchise for the Town of Newfane, New York. (Fund
11-B) (2)

10.1.13 Copy of renewal order adopted 12/11/91. (Fund 11-B)
(4)
55
EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number Exhibit Description Page
- ------- ------------------- ----

10.1.14 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto
granting a community antenna television system
franchise for the Town and Village of Orchard Park,
New York. (Fund 11-B)

10.1.15 Copy of a franchise and related documents thereto
granting a community antenna television system
franchise for Somerset, New York. (Fund 11-B) (3)

10.2.1 Copy of Credit Agreement dated as of February 28,
1995 among the Registrant, various financial
institutions as lenders and Shawmut Bank
Connecticut, N.A., as agent for the lenders

27 Financial Data Schedule

(1) Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report
on Form 8-K dated September 8, 1995.

(2) Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1985.

(2) Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1989.

(3) Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1992.

(4) Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1990.