1
AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBER 4, 1998
REGISTRATION NO. 333-
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
---------------------
FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
---------------------
OPTEL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
---------------------
DELAWARE 4841 94-4495524
(State or other jurisdiction (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or Classification Code Number) Identification No.)
organization)
1111 W. MOCKINGBIRD LANE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75247
(214) 634-3800
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrant's principal executive offices)
---------------------
LOUIS BRUNEL, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OPTEL, INC.
1111 W. MOCKINGBIRD LANE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75247
(214) 634-3800
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
---------------------
Copy to:
ERIC SIMONSON, ESQ. MICHAEL E. KATZENSTEIN, ESQ.
KRONISH LIEB WEINER & HELLMAN LLP OPTEL, INC.
1114 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 1111 W. MOCKINGBIRD LANE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10036-7798 DALLAS, TEXAS 75247
(212) 479-6000 (214) 634-3800
---------------------
APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO PUBLIC: As soon as
practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
---------------------
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered in
connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with
General Instruction G, check the following box. [ ]
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and
list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
- ---------------------
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. [ ]
- ---------------------
---------------------
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED PROPOSED
MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
TITLE OF SECURITIES AMOUNT TO BE OFFERING PRICE AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF
TO BE REGISTERED REGISTERED PER UNIT OFFERING PRICE REGISTRATION FEE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11 1/2% Senior Notes Due 2008,
Series B..................... $200,000,000 100% $200,000,000 $59,000
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR
DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL
FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION
STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(A), MAY DETERMINE.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT. A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATING TO THESE SECURITIES HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THESE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD NOR MAY
OFFERS TO BUY BE ACCEPTED PRIOR TO THE TIME THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT BECOMES
EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE
SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY NOR SHALL THERE BE ANY SALE OF THESE SECURITIES
IN ANY STATE IN WHICH SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE WOULD BE UNLAWFUL PRIOR
TO REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY SUCH STATE.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED SEPTEMBER 4, 1998
PROSPECTUS
OFFER TO EXCHANGE
11 1/2% SENIOR NOTES DUE 2008, SERIES B
FOR ANY AND ALL OUTSTANDING 11 1/2% SENIOR NOTES DUE 2008
OF
OPTEL, INC.
THE EXCHANGE OFFER WILL EXPIRE AT 5:00 P.M.,
NEW YORK CITY TIME, ON , 1998, UNLESS EXTENDED
OpTel, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Issuer"), hereby offers, upon the
terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Prospectus and the
accompanying Letter of Transmittal (which together constitute the "Exchange
Offer"), to exchange $1,000 principal amount of 11 1/2% Senior Notes Due 2008,
Series B, of the Issuer (the "1998 Series B Notes") for each $1,000 principal
amount of the issued and outstanding 11 1/2% Senior Notes Due 2008 of the Issuer
(the "1998 Series A Notes," and collectively with the 1998 Series B Notes, the
"1998 Notes"). As of the date of this Prospectus, $200,000,000 principal amount
of the 1998 Series A Notes were outstanding. The terms of the 1998 Series B
Notes will be substantially identical in all material respects (including
interest rate and maturity) to the 1998 Series A Notes except for certain
transfer restrictions and registration rights relating to the 1998 Series A
Notes.
The Exchange Offer is being made to satisfy certain obligations of the
Issuer under the Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 7, 1998, among
the Issuer and the other signatories thereto (the "Registration Agreement").
Upon consummation of the Exchange Offer, holders of 1998 Series A Notes that
were not prohibited from participating in the Exchange Offer and did not tender
their 1998 Series A Notes will not have any registration rights under the
Registration Agreement and such 1998 Series A Notes will continue to be subject
to the restrictions on transfer contained in the legend thereon. If the Exchange
Offer is not consummated, or a shelf registration statement is not filed or is
not declared effective or, after either this registration statement or the shelf
registration statement has been declared effective, such registration statement
thereafter ceases to be effective or usable (subject to certain exceptions) in
connection with resales of 1998 Series A Notes or 1998 Series B Notes in
accordance with and during the periods specified in the Registration Agreement,
additional interest will accrue and be payable on the 1998 Notes until such
registration statement is declared effective or the Exchange Offer is
consummated. See "Exchange Offer; Registration Rights."
Based on interpretations by the staff of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "SEC" or "Commission") with respect to similar transactions, the
Issuer believes that the 1998 Series B Notes issued pursuant to the Exchange
Offer in exchange for the 1998 Series A Notes may be offered for resale, resold
and otherwise transferred by holders thereof (other than any holder which is an
"affiliate" of the Issuer within the meaning of Rule 405 under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder
(the "Securities Act")) without compliance with the registration and prospectus
delivery requirements of the Securities Act, provided that the 1998 Series B
Notes are acquired in the ordinary course of the holder's business, the holder
has no arrangement with any person to participate in the distribution of the
1998 Series B Notes and neither the holder nor any other person is engaging in
or intends to engage in a distribution of the 1998 Series B Notes. Each
broker-dealer that receives 1998 Series B Notes for its own account pursuant to
the Exchange Offer must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in
connection with any resale of 1998 Series B Notes. The Letter of Transmittal
states that by so acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer
will not be deemed to admit that it is an "underwriter" within the meaning of
the Securities Act. This Prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from
time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection with resales of the
1998 Series B Notes received in exchange for the 1998 Series A Notes where such
1998 Series B Notes were acquired by such broker-dealer as a result of
market-making activities or other trading activities. The Issuer has agreed
that, starting on the Exchange Date (as defined) and ending on the close of
business on the earlier of the first anniversary of the Exchange Date or the
date upon which all such 1998 Series B Notes have been sold by such
participating broker-dealer, it will make this Prospectus available to any
broker-dealer for use in connection with any such resale. See "Plan of
Distribution."
The 1998 Series B Notes will evidence the same debt as the 1998 Series A
Notes and will be entitled to the benefits of the Indenture (as defined). For a
more complete description of the terms of the 1998 Series B Notes, see
"Description of the 1998 Series B Notes." There will be no cash proceeds to the
Issuer from the Exchange Offer. The 1998 Series B Notes will be senior unsecured
obligations of the Issuer, and will rank pari passu in right of payment with all
present and future senior unsecured obligations of the Issuer, including the
Issuer's 13% Senior Notes due 2005 (the "1997 Notes"), except to the limited
extent the 1997 Notes and the 1998 Series A Notes are, and the 1998 Series B
Notes will be, secured by pledged securities in an amount sufficient to provide
funds for the payment of interest for a period of time. The 1998 Series B Notes
will rank senior in right of payment to all present and future subordinated
indebtedness of the Issuer. The Issuer is a holding company that derives
substantially all of its operating income and cash flow from its subsidiaries,
and claims in respect of the 1998 Series B Notes will be effectively
subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and liabilities of such
subsidiaries. As of May 31, 1998, after giving pro forma effect to the Offering
(as defined) and the Senior Credit Facility Retirement (as defined), the total
indebtedness and other liabilities of subsidiaries of the Issuer (excluding any
indebtedness owed to the Issuer) would have been approximately $35.4 million.
The Issuer's subsidiaries are expected to incur substantial additional
indebtedness in the future. See "Capitalization" and "Description of the 1998
Series B Notes -- Ranking."
The 1998 Series A Notes were originally issued and sold on July 7, 1998 in a
transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance upon
the exemptions provided by Rule 144A and by Regulation S of the Securities Act.
Accordingly, the 1998 Series A Notes may not be reoffered, resold or otherwise
pledged, hypothecated or transferred in the United States unless so registered
or unless an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act
and applicable state securities laws is available.
The Issuer has not entered into any arrangement or understanding with any
person to distribute the 1998 Series B Notes to be received in the Exchange
Offer and to the best of the Issuer's information and belief, each person
participating in the Exchange Offer is acquiring the 1998 Series B Notes in its
ordinary course of business and has no arrangement or understanding with any
person to participate in the distribution of the 1998 Series B Notes to be
received in the Exchange Offer.
The Exchange Offer is not conditioned upon any minimum aggregate principal
amount of 1998 Series A Notes being tendered for exchange. The Exchange Offer
will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on , 1998, unless
extended (the "Expiration Date"). The date of acceptance for exchange of the
1998 Series A Notes for the 1998 Series B Notes (the "Exchange Date") will be
the first business day following the Expiration Date. The 1998 Series A Notes
tendered pursuant to the Exchange Offer may be withdrawn at any time prior to
the Expiration Date; otherwise such tenders are irrevocable.
Prior to this Exchange Offer, there has been no public market for the 1998
Notes. The 1998 Series A Notes have traded on the PORTAL Market. If a market for
the 1998 Series B Notes should develop, the 1998 Series B Notes could trade at a
discount from their principal amount. The Issuer does not currently intend to
list the 1998 Series B Notes on any securities exchange or to seek approval for
quotation through any automated quotation system. There can be no assurance that
an active public market for the 1998 Series B Notes will develop.
SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 11 FOR A DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN FACTORS
THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED BY PARTICIPANTS IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER.
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SEC OR ANY STATE
SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SEC OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED
UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE
CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
The date of this Prospectus is , 1998.
3
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
The following summary is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read
in conjunction with, the more detailed information included elsewhere in this
Prospectus, including the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes
thereto. As used in this Prospectus, the terms the "Company" or "OpTel" mean
OpTel, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries, except where the
context otherwise requires. Certain terms used herein are defined in the
glossary attached hereto as Appendix A. References to fiscal years throughout
this Prospectus are to the Company's fiscal years, which end on August 31 of
each calendar year. Prospective investors should carefully consider the factors
set forth in "Risk Factors." This Prospectus contains "forward-looking"
statements concerning the Company's operations, economic performance and
financial condition, which are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties,
including those identified under "Risk Factors."
THE COMPANY
OpTel is a leading network based provider of integrated communications
services, including local and long distance telephone and cable television
services, to residents of multiple dwelling units ("MDUs") in the United States.
As a rapidly growing integrated communications provider ("ICP"), OpTel continues
to build upon its position as the largest provider of private cable television
services to MDUs in the United States. In each market that it serves, OpTel
seeks to become the principal competitor in the MDU marketplace to the incumbent
local exchange carrier ("ILEC") and the incumbent franchise cable television
operator by providing a package of voice, video and Internet access services at
competitive prices. OpTel believes its contractual relationships with MDU owners
and associations and its ability to deliver an integrated service offering to
MDU residents over its own networks provide it with a competitive advantage.
MDUs comprise a wide variety of high density residential complexes,
including high- and low-rise apartment buildings, condominiums, cooperatives,
town houses and mobile home communities. According to 1990 U.S. Census Bureau
data, there are more than 13.2 million dwelling units in MDUs with greater than
10 dwelling units in the United States. Within the MDU market, the Company
focuses on MDUs of 150 or more dwelling units ("Large MDUs"). Based on industry
sources, the Company believes that, within its existing markets, as of March 25,
1998, there were approximately 3.0 million dwelling units within these Large
MDUs.
The Company is currently building telecommunications infrastructure in its
serviced markets and expects, by the end of calendar 1999, to be in a position
to offer facilities based telecommunications services in each of its major
markets. The Company presently offers services where it has a right of entry
agreement ("Right of Entry") with an MDU owner to provide its cable television
and/or telecommunications services. The Company classifies a unit as "passed" if
it is within an MDU for which the Company has a Right of Entry and the Company
has connected the equipment necessary to provide services. As of May 31, 1998,
the Company had 369,968 units passed for cable television services. At that
date, OpTel had 202,355 cable television subscribers and 7,046 telecommunication
lines in service.
OpTel began operations in April 1993 with a strategy of consolidating the
then fragmented "private cable" television, or non-franchise cable television,
industry serving MDUs. Securing long-term Rights of Entry has been an integral
element of this strategy. The Company's Rights of Entry typically have original
terms of 10 to 15 years (five years for Rights of Entry with condominium
associations). The weighted average unexpired term of the Company's Rights of
Entry was approximately eight years as of May 31, 1998 (assuming the Company's
exercise of available renewal options). Rights of Entry generally provide
financial incentives to the property owners to promote and sell the Company's
cable television and telecommunications services to MDU residents. The Company
provides video programming to MDUs primarily under exclusive Rights of Entry.
The Company initially offered shared tenant telecommunications services ("STS")
to MDUs serviced under telephone Rights of Entry utilizing remote private branch
exchange ("PBX") switches. In accordance with its communications strategy, the
Company has begun the process of migrating its STS traffic to its own central
office switches and its own network facilities. The Company intends to grow its
business by negotiating additional Rights of Entry to serve MDUs currently
served by other providers and newly-constructed MDUs, by acquiring other
existing operators that serve MDUs, as appropriate, and by providing MDUs it
currently serves for cable television with additional services, such as
telephone and Internet access.
4
The Company currently provides cable television and telecommunications
services in a number of metropolitan areas including Houston, Dallas-Fort Worth,
Los Angeles, San Diego, Miami-Ft. Lauderdale, Phoenix, Denver, San Francisco,
Chicago, Atlanta and Orlando-Tampa. The Company has commenced offering central
office switched local exchange services in Houston and Dallas-Fort Worth and is
licensed as a competitive local exchange carrier ("CLEC") in each of its other
major markets. The Company selected its current markets based upon their growth
characteristics, competitive conditions, MDU concentrations, favorable
demographics and regulatory environment.
Since April 1995, OpTel has been indirectly majority owned by Le Groupe
Videotron Ltee ("GVL"), which also owns the second largest cable television
operator in Canada (based on number of subscribers). GVL has invested
approximately $250 million in OpTel in the form of equity capital and
subordinated convertible notes (including accrued interest). See "-- Recent
Developments." These invested amounts have been critical to OpTel's growth. In
addition, key members of the Company's management team gained experience in the
competitive offering of telecommunications and cable television to residential
markets while serving as executives of a GVL affiliate in the United Kingdom.
OpTel management's extensive operating experience in both the telecommunications
and cable television industries, including the construction and design of
networks and sales and customer support, provides OpTel with significant
expertise in managing and developing an infrastructure to support voice, video
and Internet access operations.
OpTel was incorporated in Delaware in July 1994 as the successor to a
California limited partnership that was organized in April 1993. The Company's
principal offices are located at 1111 W. Mockingbird Lane, Dallas, Texas 75247,
and its telephone number is (214) 634-3800.
STRATEGY
OpTel's goal is to become the nation's largest ICP focusing on MDU markets.
OpTel's strategy for achieving this goal includes the following key components:
Provide an Integrated Service Offering. OpTel believes that by utilizing a
single advanced network infrastructure it can be among the first to market a
competitive integrated package of voice and video services in its target
markets. The Company plans to supplement its voice and video offerings with high
speed Internet access in all of its serviced markets. The Company also intends
to introduce integrated billing of its bundled services during fiscal 1999.
Deploy Cost Effective Networks. OpTel's networks are specifically designed
to provide services to MDUs. A substantial amount of the capital required to
provide property-specific voice and video services to an individual MDU is
invested only after the Company and the owner of the MDU have entered into a
Right of Entry for the MDU and therefore will only be incurred shortly before
properties are first brought into service or as needed to bring non-network
served MDUs onto the Company's networks. In markets served by the Company's
microwave networks, OpTel expects that the incremental capital required for it
to launch central office switched telecommunications services and to connect
customers will be lower than that of its competitors. As a result, OpTel expects
to enjoy a lower network cost structure than certain of its competitors.
Pursue Focused Marketing Strategy. The Company negotiates long term Rights
of Entry with MDU owners under which the Company obtains, among other things,
the exclusive right to provide cable television services to an MDU or group of
MDUs and an undertaking by the MDU owner to promote OpTel as the preferred
telecommunications alternative to the ILEC within the MDU. The Rights of Entry
generally provide MDU owners with financial incentives to work closely with the
Company to promote its products and services. The Company offers prospective
customers the opportunity to subscribe for Company services at the same time
they sign their unit leases. The Company believes this access, coupled with
customer preference for a single source of cable television and
telecommunications services, significantly enhances its customer marketing
efforts.
Provide Superior Customer Service. The Company has dedicated resources to
providing services that attract and retain subscribers. The Company has a
national customer service center staffed with knowledgeable representatives to
address the needs of customers 24-hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week and dedicated
local
2
5
service teams that provide prompt installation and response to customer service
calls. Because the Company believes that the best way to control the quality and
consistency of technical and field services is to train and supervise the
service technicians, the Company relies primarily on its own personnel to
perform these functions.
Pursue Selective Acquisitions and Strategic Relationships. To expand its
markets and to achieve critical mass in its existing markets, the Company often
evaluates opportunities to make acquisitions. Since May 1996, the Company has
completed six acquisitions representing approximately 700 MDUs served and
103,000 subscribers. In addition, the Company has entered into a strategic
relationship for the delivery of high speed Internet access services and will
continue to evaluate other alliances, including those permitting it to host
additional third-party traffic on its switches.
RISK FACTORS
The Company operates in highly competitive market segments which are
subject to extensive regulation at the federal, state and local level. The
Company has recently begun introducing central office switched
telecommunications services to MDUs. The Company's success in providing
telecommunications services, as well as cable television and Internet access
services, is dependent upon a number of factors, some of which are controlled by
the Company and some of which are controlled by third parties, including ILECs,
MDU owners and residents and government entities. Such factors include risks
associated with the Company's history of net losses and negative cash flow, the
Company's substantial indebtedness and the insufficiency of its earnings to
cover fixed charges, the significant capital requirements of the Company's
operations and the Company's dependence upon its strategic relationships with
MDU owners. See "Risk Factors" for a detailed discussion of certain factors
which should be considered in evaluating the Company and its business in
connection with the Exchange Offer.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
The Company commenced operating a central office telephone switch in
Houston in September 1997 and has migrated most of its telecommunications
subscribers in the Houston market to this switch. The Company has recently
commenced operating a central office telephone switch in the Dallas-Fort Worth
market and intends to migrate the MDUs it currently serves through PBX switches
in that market to that central office switch over the coming months.
On April 13, 1998, OpTel completed the acquisition of the private cable
television and telecommunications service agreements and related assets of
Interactive Cable Systems, Inc. ("ICS") in Houston, Dallas-Fort Worth, Los
Angeles, San Diego, Miami-Ft. Lauderdale, Phoenix, Denver, San Francisco,
Chicago, Atlanta, Orlando-Tampa, Indianapolis, Austin and greater Washington,
D.C. (the "ICS Operations"), subject to the consummation of certain transfer
conditions. As of May 31, 1998, OpTel had acquired approximately 66,000 cable
television and telecommunications units under contract (or approximately 72% of
the approximately 90,000 units under contract to be acquired). A corresponding
percentage of the aggregate $80.8 million purchase price remains in escrow
subject to release upon fulfillment of transfer conditions. While the Company
expects the transfer of the remaining units to be completed over the next few
months, the transfer of these units is subject to certain conditions, including
the receipt of third party consents, and there can be no assurance that the
transfer of all or part of the balance of the acquisition will be completed. See
"Risk Factors -- Risks Associated with Acquisitions." The Company also services,
under a management agreement, the approximately 24,000 units with respect to
which, as of May 31, 1998, there remain unsatisfied transfer conditions.
Pursuant to its management agreement with ICS, during the management period, the
Company receives all the revenues from and incurs the expenses associated with
delivering services to such units. The $80.8 million purchase price comprises
approximately $4.5 million in cash, approximately $16.1 million in shares of the
Company's Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Class A Common
Stock"), approximately $59.4 million in shares of the Company's 8% Series B
Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Series B Preferred") plus
assumed liabilities of $0.8 million. See "Description of Capital
Stock -- Preferred Stock."
3
6
Effective March 1, 1998, the Company's majority stockholder, VPC
Corporation ("VPC"), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of GVL, exchanged
$139.2 million of the Company's 15% Convertible Notes (the "GVL Notes"),
constituting all of the outstanding GVL Notes (including accrued interest), for
approximately 6,962 shares of the Company's 9.75% Series A Preferred Stock, par
value $.01 per share, (the "Series A Preferred"). See "Description of Capital
Stock -- Preferred Stock."
On June 5, 1998, OpTel filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the
Commission with respect to a proposed initial public offering (the "IPO") of
$100.0 million of its Class A Common Stock. No assurance can be given that the
IPO will be consummated or, if consummated, that the proceeds received by the
Company will be the amount currently contemplated.
On July 7, 1998, the Company consummated a private placement of $200
million principal amount of the 1998 Series A Notes (the "Offering"). The net
proceeds of the Offering were approximately $194.1 million. Of this amount,
approximately $126.3 million was used to repay all outstanding amounts under the
Company's senior secured credit facility (the "Senior Credit Facility") and to
pay other costs associated with terminating the Senior Credit Facility (the
"Senior Credit Facility Retirement"), and approximately $22.0 million was placed
in an escrow account to fund the first two interest payments on the 1998 Notes.
4
7
THE EXCHANGE OFFER
Securities Offered......... Up to $200,000,000 aggregate principal amount of
11 1/2% Senior Notes Due 2008, Series B, of the
Issuer. The terms of the 1998 Series B Notes and
the 1998 Series A Notes will be substantially
identical in all material respects, except for
certain transfer restrictions and registration
rights relating to the 1998 Series A Notes which
will not apply to the 1998 Series B Notes. See
"Description of the 1998 Series B Notes."
The Exchange Offer......... The Issuer is offering to exchange $1,000 principal
amount of 1998 Series B Notes for each $1,000
principal amount of 1998 Series A Notes. See "The
Exchange Offer" for a description of the procedures
for tendering 1998 Series A Notes. The Exchange
Offer satisfies the registration obligations of the
Issuer under the Registration Agreement. Upon
consummation of the Exchange Offer, holders of 1998
Series A Notes that were not prohibited from
participating in the Exchange Offer and did not
tender their 1998 Series A Notes will not have any
registration rights under the Registration
Agreement with respect to such non-tendered 1998
Series A Notes and, accordingly, such 1998 Series A
Notes will continue to be subject to the
restrictions on transfer contained in the legend
thereon.
Tenders, Expiration Date;
Withdrawal............... The Exchange Offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New
York City time, on , 1998, or such later
date and time to which it is extended. Tenders of
1998 Series A Notes pursuant to the Exchange Offer
may be withdrawn and retendered at any time prior
to the Expiration Date. Any 1998 Series A Notes not
accepted for exchange for any reason will be
returned without expense to the tendering holder as
promptly as practicable after the expiration or
termination of the Exchange Offer.
Federal Income Tax
Considerations........... The Exchange Offer will not result in any income,
gain or loss to the holders of 1998 Notes or the
Issuer for federal income tax purposes. See
"Certain Federal Income Tax Considerations."
Use of Proceeds............ There will be no proceeds to the Issuer from the
exchange of the 1998 Series B Notes for the 1998
Series A Notes pursuant to the Exchange Offer.
Exchange Agent............. U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A., the trustee (the
"Trustee") under the Indenture is serving as
exchange agent (the "Exchange Agent") in connection
with the Exchange Offer.
CONSEQUENCES OF EXCHANGING OR FAILING TO EXCHANGE 1998 SERIES A NOTES PURSUANT
TO THE EXCHANGE OFFER
Generally, holders of 1998 Series A Notes (other than any holder who is an
"affiliate" of the Issuer within the meaning of Rule 405 under the Securities
Act) who exchange their 1998 Series A Notes for 1998 Series B Notes pursuant to
the Exchange Offer may offer their 1998 Series B Notes for resale, resell their
1998 Series B Notes, and otherwise transfer their 1998 Series B Notes without
compliance with the registration and prospectus delivery provisions of the
Securities Act, provided such 1998 Series B Notes are acquired in the ordinary
course of the holders' business, such holders have no arrangement with any
person to participate in a distribution of such 1998 Series B Notes and neither
the holder nor any other person is engaging in or intends to engage in a
distribution of the 1998 Series B Notes. Each broker-dealer that receives 1998
Series B Notes for its own account in exchange for 1998 Series A Notes, where
such 1998 Series A Notes were acquired by such broker-dealer as a result of
market-making activities or other trading activities,
5
8
must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale
of its 1998 Series B Notes. See "Plan of Distribution." To comply with the
securities laws of certain jurisdictions, it may be necessary to qualify for
sale or register the 1998 Series B Notes prior to offering or selling such 1998
Series B Notes. The Issuer is required, under the Registration Agreement, to
register the 1998 Series B Notes in any jurisdiction reasonably requested by the
holders, subject to certain limitations. Upon consummation of the Exchange
Offer, holders that were not prohibited from participating in the Exchange Offer
and did not tender their 1998 Series A Notes will not have any registration
rights under the Registration Agreement with respect to such non-tendered 1998
Series A Notes and, accordingly, such 1998 Series A Notes will continue to be
subject to the restrictions on transfer contained in the legend thereon. In
general, the 1998 Series A Notes may not be offered or sold (except in private
transactions), unless registered under the Securities Act and applicable state
securities laws. See "The Exchange Offer -- Consequences of Failure to
Exchange."
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE 1998 SERIES B NOTES
Securities Offered......... Up to $200,000,000 aggregate principal amount of
11 1/2% Senior Notes Due 2008, Series B, of the
Issuer. The terms of the 1998 Series B Notes and
the 1998 Series A Notes will be substantially
identical in all material respects, except for
certain transfer restrictions and registration
rights relating to the 1998 Series A Notes which
will not apply to the 1998 Series B Notes. See
"Description of the 1998 Series B Notes."
Maturity................... July 1, 2008.
Interest Payment Dates..... Each January 1 and July 1, commencing on January 1,
1999.
Escrow Proceeds............ At the closing of the Offering, the Issuer
deposited with an escrow agent (the "Escrow Agent")
approximately $22.0 million; which, together with
the proceeds from the investment thereof, will be
sufficient to pay when due the first two interest
payments on the 1998 Notes, with any balance to be
retained by the Issuer. See "Description of the
1998 Series B Notes -- Disbursement of Funds;
Escrow Account."
Ranking.................... The 1998 Series B Notes will be senior unsecured
obligations of the Issuer, and rank pari passu in
right of payment with all present and future senior
unsecured obligations of the Issuer, including the
Issuer's 1997 Notes, except to the limited extent
that the 1997 Notes and the 1998 Series A Notes are
and the 1998 Series B Notes will be, secured by
pledged securities in an amount sufficient to
provide funds for the payment of interest for a
period of time. The 1998 Series B Notes will rank
senior in right of payment to all present and
future subordinated obligations of the Issuer. The
Issuer is a holding company that derives
substantially all of its operating income and cash
flow from its subsidiaries, and claims in respect
of the 1998 Series B Notes will be effectively
subordinated to all existing and future
indebtedness and liabilities of such subsidiaries
and to all secured obligations of the Issuer to the
extent of the value of the assets securing such
obligations. As of May 31, 1998, after giving pro
forma effect to the Offering and the Senior Credit
Facility Retirement, the total indebtedness and
other liabilities of subsidiaries of the Issuer
(excluding any indebtedness owed to the Issuer)
would have been approximately $35.4 million. The
Issuer's subsidiaries are expected to incur
substantial additional indebtedness in the future.
See "Capitalization," "Description of Certain
Indebtedness" and "Description of the 1998 Series B
Notes -- Ranking."
Sinking Fund............... None.
6
9
Optional Redemption........ On or after July 1, 2003, the 1998 Series B Notes
will be redeemable at the option of the Issuer, in
whole or in part at any time, at the redemption
prices set forth herein, plus accrued and unpaid
interest thereon, if any, to the date of
redemption. In addition, in the event, prior to
July 1, 2001, of one or more Equity Offerings (as
defined) and/or sales of Common Stock (as defined)
to one or more Strategic Equity Investors (as
defined) for aggregate gross proceeds of $100.0
million or more, the Issuer may redeem up to 35% of
the initially outstanding aggregate principal
amount of 1998 Notes from the net proceeds thereof
at a redemption price equal to 111.50% of the
principal amount of the 1998 Notes, together with
accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, to the
date of redemption, provided that at least $130.0
million aggregate principal amount of 1998 Notes
are outstanding following such redemption. See
"Description of the 1998 Series B
Notes -- Redemption."
Change of Control.......... Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control (as
defined), each holder of 1998 Series B Notes will
have the right to require the Issuer to make an
offer to purchase all or a portion of such holder's
1998 Series B Notes at a purchase price equal to
101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued
and unpaid interest thereon, if any, to the date of
purchase. The Issuer may not have sufficient funds
or the financial resources necessary to satisfy its
obligations to repurchase the 1998 Series B Notes
and other debt that may become repayable upon a
Change of Control. See "Description of the 1998
Series B Notes -- Certain Covenants -- Change of
Control."
Certain Covenants.......... The indenture governing the 1998 Notes (the
"Indenture") contains covenants relating to, among
other things, the following matters: (i) incurrence
of additional indebtedness; (ii) restricted
payments; (iii) limitations on liens; (iv)
disposition of proceeds of asset sales; (v)
dividend and other payment restrictions affecting
subsidiaries; (vi) mergers, consolidation or sales
of assets; and (vii) limitations on transactions
with affiliates. See "Description of the 1998
Series B Notes -- Certain Covenants."
For additional information concerning the 1998 Series B Notes and the
definitions of certain capitalized terms used above, see "Description of the
1998 Series B Notes."
7
10
SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
The summary consolidated financial data as of and for the eight month
period ended August 31, 1995 and the years ended August 31, 1996 and 1997 have
been derived from the consolidated financial statements of the Company included
elsewhere herein and audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, as
set forth in their report thereon also included herein. The summary historical
consolidated financial and operating data presented below as of and for the nine
month periods ended May 31, 1997 and 1998 have been derived from unaudited
consolidated financial statements of the Company. In the opinion of management,
the unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same
basis as the audited financial statements and include all adjustments, which
consist only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair
presentation of the Company's financial position and results of operation for
these periods. In 1995, the Company changed its fiscal year end to August 31 to
match that of its majority stockholder. As a result of the change in fiscal year
end and the Company's history of growth through acquisitions, the Company's
historical financial results are not directly comparable from period to period,
nor are they indicative of future results of operations in many respects. The
unaudited pro forma balance sheet data as of May 31, 1998 give effect to the
Offering and the Senior Credit Facility Retirement, as though such events
occurred on such date. The unaudited pro forma consolidated operations data for
the year ended August 31, 1997 and the nine months ended May 31, 1998 give
effect to the Offering, the Senior Credit Facility Retirement and the
acquisition of the ICS Operations as if such events had occurred at the
beginning of the periods presented. The unaudited pro forma consolidated
statements of operations data and the unaudited pro forma balance sheet data are
not necessarily indicative of what the actual results of operations or financial
position of the Company would have been had such events occurred at such dates,
nor do they purport to represent the Company's results of operations or
financial position for future periods. The following information should be read
in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations," "Business," the Consolidated Financial Statements of
the Company and the notes thereto and the Pro Forma Financial Information,
appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus.
HISTORICAL PRO FORMA
-------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------
EIGHT MONTH YEAR ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED NINE MONTHS
PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, MAY 31, YEAR ENDED ENDED
AUGUST 31, ------------------- ------------------- AUGUST 31, MAY 31,
1995 1996 1997 1997 1998 1997(1)(2) 1998(1)(2)
------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
DATA
Revenues:
Cable television........ $ 8,783 $ 25,893 $ 36,915 $ 26,915 $ 42,195 $ 51,334 $ 51,808
Telecommunications...... 788 1,711 2,922 2,202 2,721 5,131 3,810
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total
revenues...... 9,571 27,604 39,837 29,117 44,916 56,465 55,618
Operating expenses:
Programming, access fees
and revenue
sharing.............. 4,558 11,868 19,202 14,016 20,213 28,149 25,030
Customer support,
general and
administrative....... 12,055 19,636 28,926 19,842 25,044 35,530 28,861
Depreciation and
amortization......... 2,420 8,676 14,505 9,934 18,432 25,952 25,930
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total operating
expenses................ 19,033 40,180 62,633 43,792 63,689 89,631 79,821
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Loss from operations...... (9,462) (12,576) (22,796) (14,675) (18,773) (33,166) (24,203)
Interest expense,
net(3).................. (1,169) (5,854) (25,739) (16,993) (29,459) (48,881) (41,788)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Loss before income
taxes................... (10,631) (18,430) (48,535) (31,668) (48,232) (82,047) (65,991)
Net loss(4)............... $(10,161) $(18,430) $(48,535) $(31,668) $(48,232) $(82,047) $(65,991)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Dividends on preferred
stock................... -- -- -- -- (4,068) (4,757) (6,962)
Loss attributable to
common equity........... $(10,161) $(18,430) $(48,535) $(31,668) $(52,300) $(86,804) $(79,953)
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Basic and diluted loss per
share of common
equity(5)............... $ (6.89) $ (8.30) $ (19.98) $ (13.23) $ (20.04) $ (33.46) $ (26.61)
8
11
HISTORICAL
--------------------- PRO FORMA
AUGUST 31, MAY 31, MAY 31,
1997 1998 1998(1)
---------- -------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
BALANCE SHEET DATA
Cash and cash equivalents................................... $ 87,305 $ 99,704 $145,619
Restricted investments...................................... 67,206 55,294 77,079
Property, plant and equipment, net.......................... 160,442 251,324 251,324
Intangible assets........................................... 82,583 160,255 160,956
Total assets................................................ 403,416 576,098 644,499
Convertible notes due stockholder........................... 129,604 -- --
Total indebtedness.......................................... 358,177 353,786 428,786
Total liabilities........................................... 383,051 393,224 468,224
Stockholders' equity........................................ 20,365 182,874 176,275
NINE MONTHS
EIGHT MONTH YEAR ENDED ENDED
PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, MAY 31,
AUGUST 31, -------------------- ---------------------
1995 1996 1997 1997 1998
------------ -------- --------- --------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA
Net cash flows used in operating
activities....................... $ (3,494) $ (453) $ (15,935) $ (2,623) $ (15,151)
Net cash flows used in investing
activities....................... (72,144) (72,037) (143,125) (129,127) (88,675)
Net cash flows provided by
financing activities............. 72,655 72,131 244,688 243,570 116,225
Capital expenditures(6)............ 22,170 62,121 71,505 44,470 62,015
EBITDA(7).......................... (7,042) (3,900) (8,291) (4,741) (341)
Deficiency of earnings to fixed
charges(8)....................... 10,630 20,280 50,791 33,182 50,383
AS OF
-----------------------------------------
AUGUST 31,
------------------------------ MAY 31,
1995 1996 1997 1998
-------- -------- -------- --------
OPERATING DATA
CABLE TELEVISION
Units under contract(9)............................. 173,324 241,496 295,149 431,384
Units passed(10).................................... 170,336 225,433 254,032 397,281
Basic subscribers................................... 75,944 114,163 132,556 217,106
Basic penetration(11)............................... 44.6% 50.6% 52.2% 54.6%
Premium units(12)................................... 39,753 60,641 95,150 175,478
Pay-to-basic ratio(12)(13).......................... 52.3% 53.1% 71.8% 86.7%
Average monthly revenue per basic subscriber(14).... $ 22.84 $ 22.70 $ 24.94 $ 27.74
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Units under contract(9)............................. 10,322 20,945 39,831 89,911
Units passed(10).................................... 9,116 12,364 16,572 33,131
Lines(15)........................................... 2,650 4,126 6,185 7,700
Line penetration(16)................................ 29.1% 33.4% 37.3% 26.6%
Average monthly revenue per line(17)................ $ 36.86 $ 42.10 $ 47.23 $ 50.63
- ---------------
(1) Gives effect to the Offering and the Senior Credit Facility Retirement.
(2) Gives effect to the acquisition of the ICS Operations.
(3) Interest expense, net is reflected net of interest income and interest
capitalized in property, plant and equipment. Includes interest expense on
the GVL Notes of approximately $919,000, $5,342,000, $15,204,000,
$10,671,000 and $9,640,000 for the eight month period ended August 31,
1995, the years ended August 31, 1996 and 1997 and the nine months ended
May 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively.
(4) The Company had no taxable income for the periods reported. The Company
reported an income tax benefit of approximately $470,000 for the eight
month period ended August 31, 1995.
9
12
(5) Loss per share has been restated to reflect the adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share." Basic and
diluted loss per share are computed in the same manner since common stock
equivalents are antidilutive.
(6) Capital expenditures include expenditures on property, plant and equipment
together with intangible assets excluding expenditures for business
acquisitions.
(7) EBITDA represents earnings before interest expense (net of interest income
and amounts capitalized), income tax benefits, depreciation and
amortization. EBITDA is not intended to represent cash flow from operations
or an alternative to net loss, each as defined by generally accepted
accounting principles. In addition, the measure of EBITDA presented herein
may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures by other
companies. The Company believes that EBITDA is a standard measure commonly
reported and widely used by analysts, investors and other interested
parties in the cable television and telecommunications industries.
Accordingly, this information has been disclosed herein to permit a more
complete comparative analysis of the Company's operating performance
relative to other companies in its industry.
(8) For the purposes of calculating the deficiency of earnings to fixed
charges, (i) earnings consist of loss before income taxes plus fixed
charges and (ii) fixed charges consist of interest expense on all debt,
amortization of deferred financing costs and the portion of operating lease
rental expense that is representative of the interest factor (deemed to be
one-third of minimum operating lease rental). On a pro forma basis, after
giving effect to the Offering, the Senior Credit Facility Retirement and
the acquisition of the ICS Operations, the deficiency of earnings to fixed
charges for the periods ended August 31, 1997 and May 31, 1998 would have
been $84.3 million and $68.1 million, respectively.
(9) Units under contract represents the number of units currently passed and
additional units with respect to which the Company has entered into Rights
of Entry for the provision of cable television and telecommunications
services, respectively, but which the Company has not yet passed and which
the Company expects to pass within the next five years. At this time
substantially all units under contract for telecommunications are also
under contract for cable television.
(10) Units passed represents the number of units with respect to which the
Company has connected its cable television and telecommunications systems,
respectively. The difference between units under contract and units passed
represents units for which Rights of Entry have been entered into, but
which are not yet connected for cable television and telecommunications
services, respectively.
(11) Basic penetration is calculated by dividing the total number of basic
subscribers at such date by the total number of units passed.
(12) Beginning with the year ended August 31, 1997, to be consistent with most
other cable television providers, the Company revised the method of
reporting premium penetration to include all premium units in the
calculation. Historically the calculation excluded premium channels that
were provided to customers as part of an expanded basic line up or other
special arrangements. Prior years have not been restated. For comparative
purposes, the premium units and the pay-to-basic ratio as of August 31,
1997 and May 31, 1998 presented under the previous method of reporting are
84,875 and 129,553, respectively, and 64.0% and 64.0%, respectively.
(13) Pay-to-basic ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of premium
units by the total number of basic subscribers.
(14) Represents average monthly revenue per the average number of basic
subscribers for the fiscal periods ended as of the date shown.
(15) Lines represent the number of telephone lines currently being provided to
telecommunications subscribers. A telecommunications subscriber can
subscribe for more than one line. The Company has revised its method of
reporting lines to reflect only one line in service where multiple
customers share a single line. The Company has restated the number of lines
previously reported to reflect this change.
(16) Line penetration is calculated by dividing the total number of
telecommunications lines at such date by the total number of units passed.
(17) Represents average monthly revenue per the average number of lines for the
fiscal periods ended as of the date shown.
10
13
RISK FACTORS
In addition to other information set forth elsewhere in this Prospectus,
before tendering the 1998 Series A Notes for 1998 Series B Notes, holders should
consider the following risk factors which (other than "Consequences of Failure
to Exchange") are generally applicable to the 1998 Series A Notes as well as the
1998 Series B Notes.
CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO EXCHANGE
Upon the consummation of the Exchange Offer, holders of 1998 Series A Notes
that were not prohibited from participating in the Exchange Offer and did not
tender their 1998 Series A Notes will not have any registration rights under the
Registration Agreement with respect to such non-tendered 1998 Series A Notes
and, accordingly, such 1998 Series A Notes will continue to be subject to the
restrictions on transfer contained in the legend thereon. In general, the 1998
Series A Notes may not be offered or sold, unless registered under the
Securities Act and applicable state securities laws, except pursuant to an
exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the Securities Act and
applicable state securities laws. The Issuer does not intend to register the
1998 Series A Notes under the Securities Act.
Based on interpretations by the Staff of the SEC with respect to similar
transactions, the Issuer believes that 1998 Series B Notes issued pursuant to
the Exchange Offer in exchange for 1998 Series A Notes may be offered for
resale, resold or otherwise transferred by holders (other than any holder which
is an "affiliate" of the Issuer within the meaning of Rule 405 under the
Securities Act) without compliance with the registration and prospectus delivery
provisions of the Securities Act, provided that the 1998 Series B Notes are
acquired in the ordinary course of the holder's business, the holder has no
arrangement with any person to participate in the distribution of the 1998
Series B Notes and neither the holder nor any other person is engaging in or
intends to engage in a distribution of the 1998 Series B Notes. Each
broker-dealer that receives 1998 Series B Notes for its own account pursuant to
the Exchange Offer must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in
connection with any resale of the 1998 Series B Notes. The Letter of Transmittal
states that by so acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer
will not be deemed to admit that it is an "underwriter" within the meaning of
the Securities Act. This Prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from
time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection with resales of 1998
Series B Notes received in exchange for the 1998 Series A Notes acquired by the
broker-dealer as a result of market-making activities or other trading
activities. The Issuer has agreed that, starting on the Exchange Date and ending
on the close of business on the earlier of the first anniversary of the Exchange
Date or the date upon which all such 1998 Series B Notes have been sold by such
participating broker-dealer, it will make this Prospectus available to any
broker-dealer for use in connection with any such resale. See "Plan of
Distribution." The 1998 Series B Notes may not be offered or sold unless they
have been registered or qualified for sale under applicable state securities
laws or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is
complied with. The Registration Agreement requires the Issuer to register or
qualify the 1998 Series B Notes for resale in any state as may be reasonably
requested by their holders, subject to certain limitations.
LACK OF PUBLIC MARKET
Prior to this Exchange Offer, there has been no public market for the 1998
Series A Notes. If a market for the 1998 Series B Notes should develop, the 1998
Series B Notes may trade at a discount from their principal amount, depending
upon prevailing interest rates, the market for similar securities and other
factors including general economic conditions and the financial condition of the
Company. The Issuer does not currently intend to apply for a listing or
quotation of the 1998 Series B Notes on any securities exchange or to seek
approval for quotation through any automated quotation system. No assurance can
be given as to the liquidity of the trading market for the 1998 Series B Notes.
The liquidity of, and trading market for, the 1998 Series B Notes also may
be adversely affected by general declines in the market for similar securities.
Such a decline may adversely affect such liquidity and trading markets
independent of the financial performance of, and prospects for, the Company.
11
14
LIMITED OPERATIONS OF CERTAIN SERVICES; HISTORY OF NET LOSSES AND NEGATIVE CASH
FLOW
OpTel's business commenced in 1993. Historically, substantially all of
OpTel's revenues were derived from providing cable television services. The
Company's telephone and Internet access services only recently have been
initiated or their availability only recently expanded in new market areas.
OpTel expects to increase substantially the size of these operations in the near
future. Prospective investors, therefore, have limited historical financial
information about OpTel upon which to base an evaluation of OpTel's performance
in the markets and for the services that will be its principal focus in the
future. Given OpTel's limited experience operating telecommunications networks,
there can be no assurance that it will be able to compete successfully in the
telecommunications industry.
The development of OpTel's business and the expansion of its networks will
require substantial capital, operational and administrative expenditures, a
significant portion of which may be incurred before the realization of revenues.
These expenditures will result in negative cash flow until an adequate customer
base is established and revenues are realized. Although its revenues have
increased in each of the last three years, OpTel has incurred substantial
up-front operating expenses for marketing, customer operations, administration
and maintenance of facilities, general and administrative expenses and
depreciation and amortization in order to solicit and service customers in
advance of generating significant revenues. As a result of these factors, the
Company has generated operating losses of $6.6 million, $22.8 million, $12.6
million, and $9.5 million for the quarter ended May 31, 1998, fiscal 1997,
fiscal 1996 and the eight months ended August 31, 1995, respectively, as its
cable television and telecommunications customer base has grown. The Company
reported positive EBITDA (as defined in the Glossary) of $1.0 million for the
quarter ended May 31, 1998 as compared with negative EBITDA of $8.3 million,
$3.9 million and $7.0 million for fiscal 1997, fiscal 1996 and the eight months
ended August 31, 1995, respectively. There can be no assurance that OpTel will
achieve or sustain profitability or positive EBITDA in the future. See
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations."
SUBSTANTIAL INDEBTEDNESS; INSUFFICIENCY OF EARNINGS TO COVER FIXED CHARGES;
ABILITY TO SERVICE DEBT
The Company's indebtedness is substantial in relation to its stockholders'
equity and cash flow. As of May 31, 1998, after giving pro forma effect to the
Offering and the Senior Credit Facility Retirement, the Company had total
consolidated indebtedness of approximately $429 million (including approximately
$200 million principal amount of 1998 Series A Notes and $219 million principal
amount of the 1997 Notes) and stockholders' equity of approximately $176
million. After giving effect to the Offering, the Senior Credit Facility
Retirement, and the acquisition of the ICS Operations, the Company's earnings
would have been insufficient to cover its fixed charges by approximately $84.3
million for fiscal 1997 and $68.1 million for the nine month period ended May
31, 1998. See "Capitalization" and "Selected Historical Consolidated Financial
and Operating Data."
Both the Indenture and the indenture governing the 1997 Notes (the "1997
Notes Indenture" and together with the Indenture, the "Indentures") impose
certain restrictions on the operations and activities of the Company. See
"Description of Other Indebtedness" and "Description of the 1998 Series B
Notes." The Company's ability to make scheduled payments of principal of, or to
pay interest on, or to refinance, its indebtedness depends upon the success of
its business strategies and its future performance, which to a significant
extent are subject to general economic, financial, competitive, regulatory and
other factors beyond its control. There can be no assurance that the Company
will be able to generate the substantial increases in cash flow from operations
that will be necessary to service its indebtedness. In the absence of such
operating results, the Company could face substantial liquidity problems and
might be required to raise additional financing through the issuance of debt or
equity securities. Further, the Company expects that it may need to refinance
the principal amount of both the 1998 Notes and the 1997 Notes at their
respective maturities. There can be no assurance that the Company will be
successful in raising such financing when required or that the terms of any such
financing will be attractive. See "-- Significant Capital Requirements and Need
for Additional Financing" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources."
12
15
The degree to which OpTel is leveraged could have adverse consequences to
holders of the 1998 Series B Notes, including the following: (i) a substantial
portion of OpTel's cash flow from operations will be dedicated to the payment of
the principal of and interest on its indebtedness thereby reducing funds
available for other purposes, (ii) OpTel's vulnerability to changes in general
economic conditions or increases in prevailing interest rates could be
increased, (iii) OpTel's ability to obtain additional financing for working
capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, general corporate purposes or other
purposes could be impaired and (iv) OpTel may be more leveraged than certain of
its competitors, which may be a competitive disadvantage.
HOLDING COMPANY STRUCTURE AND NEED TO ACCESS SUBSIDIARIES' CASH FLOW
The Issuer is a holding company with limited assets that conducts
substantially all of its operations through its subsidiaries. The Issuer derives
substantially all of its revenue from the operations of its subsidiaries. The
1998 Series B Notes will be effectively subordinated to the indebtedness and
other liabilities and commitments of the Issuer's subsidiaries. The ability of
the Issuer's creditors, including the holders of the 1998 Series B Notes, to
participate in the distribution of the assets of any of the Issuer's
subsidiaries upon any liquidation or bankruptcy of any such subsidiary will be
subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary's creditors, including trade
creditors and will be limited to the extent that the outstanding shares of any
of its subsidiaries are either pledged to secure other creditors of the Issuer
or are not owned by the Issuer. After giving pro forma effect to the Offering
and the Senior Credit Facility Retirement, as of May 31, 1998, the claims of
holders of 1998 Series B Notes would have been effectively subordinated to
approximately $35.4 million of indebtedness (excluding any indebtedness owed to
the Issuer) and other liabilities of the Issuer's subsidiaries. However, the
Issuer's subsidiaries are expected to incur substantial additional indebtedness
as described under "-- Significant Capital Requirements and Need for Additional
Financing."
The 1998 Series B Notes will be obligations solely of the Issuer. The
ability of the Issuer to pay interest on the 1998 Series B Notes or to repay the
1998 Series B Notes at maturity or otherwise will be dependent upon the cash
flows of its subsidiaries and the payment of funds by those subsidiaries to the
Issuer in the form of repayment of loans, dividends, management fees or
otherwise. The Issuer's subsidiaries have no obligation, contingent or other, to
pay amounts due pursuant to the 1998 Series B Notes or to make funds available
therefor, whether in the form of loans, dividends or other distributions. In
addition, the agreements governing future indebtedness of the Issuer's
subsidiaries may contain covenants prohibiting subsidiaries from distributing or
advancing funds to the Issuer under certain circumstances, including to fund
interest payments in respect of the 1998 Series B Notes. Accordingly, the
Issuer's ability to repay the 1998 Series B Notes at maturity or otherwise may
be dependent upon the Issuer's ability to refinance the 1998 Series B Notes,
which will depend, in large part, upon factors beyond the control of the
Company.
The 1998 Series B Notes will be senior unsecured obligations of the Issuer
except to the limited extent that they will be secured by pledged securities to
provide funds for the payment of interest through July 1, 1999. Future
indebtedness may be secured, which could have material consequences to investors
in the 1998 Series B Notes. Such security may include substantially all of the
fixed assets of the Company (including those of its subsidiaries) and all of the
capital stock of the Issuer's subsidiaries. The value of a substantial portion
of the Company's fixed assets is derived from the employment of such assets in a
cable television and telecommunications business. These assets are highly
specialized and, taken individually, can be expected to have limited
marketability. Consequently, in the event of a realization by the Company's
secured creditors on the collateral securing the Company's secured debt,
creditors would likely seek to sell the business as a going concern through a
sale of pledged capital stock of subsidiaries, either in its entirety, or by
franchise or other business unit, in order to maximize the proceeds realized.
The price obtained upon any such sale could be adversely affected by the
necessity of obtaining approval of the sale from third parties, including the
applicable regulatory authorities, and compliance with other applicable
governmental regulations.
SIGNIFICANT CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS AND NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FINANCING
The Company will require substantial capital on a continuing basis to
finance cable television and telecommunications network expansion related to
subscriber and market growth, to upgrade existing facilities to desired
technical and signal quality standards and to finance any acquisitions of other
operators. The
13
16
Company believes, based on its current business plan, that its cash on hand,
will provide the Company with sufficient financial resources to fund its capital
requirements through the first quarter of fiscal 2000. However, the Company's
future capital requirements will depend upon a number of factors, including the
Company's success in obtaining new Rights of Entry, the extent of its
telecommunications roll out, the size and timing of any acquisitions, marketing
expenses, staffing levels and customer growth, as well as other factors that are
not within the Company's control, such as competitive conditions, changes in
technology, government regulation and capital costs. The Company expects to fund
additional capital requirements through internally generated funds and public or
private debt and/or equity financing. There can be no assurance, however, that
OpTel will be successful in raising sufficient debt or equity when required or
on terms that it will consider acceptable. Moreover, the terms of the 1998 Notes
and the terms of OpTel's other outstanding indebtedness impose certain
restrictions upon OpTel's ability to incur additional indebtedness or issue
additional stock. See "Description of the 1998 Series B Notes" and "Description
of Other Indebtedness." In addition, both GVL and Capital Communications CDPQ
Inc. ("CDPQ"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Caisse de depot et placement du
Quebec ("Caisse"), have the power to prevent the Company from obtaining
additional debt or equity financing. See "-- Control by GVL" and "Principal
Stockholders -- Stockholders' Agreement." Failure to generate or raise
sufficient funds may require OpTel to delay or abandon some of its future
expansion or expenditures, which would have a material adverse effect on its
growth and its ability to compete in the cable television and telecommunications
industries. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources."
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH ACQUISITIONS
OpTel expects to continue to make acquisitions of strategically important
businesses in the future when sufficiently attractive opportunities arise.
Acquisitions may divert the resources and management time of OpTel and will
require integration of the acquired operations with OpTel's existing networks
and services. There can be no assurance that any acquisition of assets,
operations or businesses, including the acquisition of the ICS Operations, will
be successfully integrated into OpTel's operations. The Company typically has
acquired businesses that were privately held by entrepreneurs, many of which
businesses were without the same regulatory compliance practices and internal
accounting controls and procedures as the Company. Accordingly, the Company
frequently is required to take remedial actions, which may include the
expenditure of funds and take extensive time to implement. In general, the
Company factors the costs associated with these matters into the terms of its
acquisitions, including, where practicable, through indemnification rights.
However, there can be no assurance that the Company's results of operations will
not be adversely affected by these or other matters arising from past or future
acquisitions. Consistent with its consolidation strategy, OpTel is currently
evaluating and often engages in discussions regarding various acquisition
opportunities. These acquisitions may be funded by cash on hand and/or through
the issuance of OpTel's debt and/or equity securities. It is possible that one
or more of such possible future acquisitions, if completed, could adversely
affect OpTel's cash flow, or increase OpTel's debt, or that such an acquisition
could be followed by a decline in the market value of OpTel's securities.
OpTel recently completed the acquisition of the ICS Operations subject to
the consummation of certain transfer conditions. A portion of the purchase price
paid for the acquisition of the ICS Operations was deposited in escrow subject
to release upon fulfillment of transfer conditions with respect to the
approximately 24,000 units for which, as of May 31, 1998, there remain
unsatisfied transfer conditions, including the receipt of third-party consents.
There can be no assurance that the Company will complete the transfer of all or
part of the balance of the ICS Operations. This Prospectus contains certain
financial information which gives pro forma effect to the acquisition of the ICS
Operations. This financial information is not indicative of the actual results
or financial position that would have been achieved had the acquisition in fact
been completed at the beginning of the periods presented. As of May 31, 1998,
the acquisition of approximately 72% of the ICS Operations had been completed.
14
17
RISK ASSOCIATED WITH TELECOMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY
The Company is currently introducing central office switched
telecommunications services to MDUs served by its existing networks. The Company
believes that a successful introduction of these telecommunications services is
important to its long-term growth. Its success will be dependent upon, among
other things, the Company's ability to assess markets, design and install
telecommunications networks, including switches, obtain cooperation of the
ILECs, when needed, and obtain any required government authorizations and
permits, all in a timely manner, at reasonable costs and on satisfactory terms
and conditions, and the willingness of MDU residents to accept a new provider of
telecommunications services. There can be no assurance that the Company will be
able to successfully introduce central office switched telecommunications
services in each of its markets in a timely manner in accordance with its
strategic objectives and failure to do so could have a material adverse effect
on the Company. Specific risks associated with the Company's telecommunications
strategy include:
Switch Installation and Network Enhancement; Lack of Redundant Switches. An
essential element of the Company's telecommunications strategy is the provision
of switched local exchange service. The Company has recently commenced operating
central office switches in its Houston and Dallas-Fort Worth markets and intends
to implement central office switches in substantially all of its major markets
by the end of calendar year 1999. In connection with the implementation of
central office switches in additional markets, the Company will be reconfiguring
its microwave networks in such markets to carry bi-directional voice traffic.
The Company intends to use certain components of its existing infrastructure to
deliver bi-directional transmission utilizing microwave frequencies, principally
in the 23GHz band. While the Company believes this frequency and other required
frequencies are available for license on the paths that will be required, the
Company has not yet commenced frequency coordination in each of its markets and
there can be no assurance regarding path or frequency availability. In addition,
there can be no assurance that the installation of the required switches and the
reconfiguration of the network will be completed on schedule. The failure of the
Company to successfully reconfigure its microwave networks and to have its
switches operational on a timely basis could have a material adverse effect upon
the Company's ability to expand its telecommunications services. In addition,
the Company intends initially to install only one switch in each market. As a
result, a switch failure which disables both the primary and redundant
capabilities of a Company switch may have a material adverse effect on the
Company's ability to provide telecommunications services in the affected market
which may continue for an indefinite period. The Company may seek to enter into
contracts with other telecommunications service providers to provide backup
capabilities in the event of a switch failure. However, there can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to successfully negotiate such
agreements or that such agreements will be available on favorable terms. See
"Business -- Network Architecture."
Reliance On Third Parties. As part of its telecommunications configuration,
the Company may transport telephone traffic across municipal boundaries or local
access and transport areas ("LATAs") which may require the Company to have
multiple interconnection agreements. While the Company has entered into
interconnection agreements with ILECs serving portions of its markets, the
Company is currently negotiating agreements for the interconnection of its
networks with the network of other ILECs in certain of the metropolitan areas
the Company serves. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
successfully negotiate interconnection agreements with the ILEC or any other
local exchange carrier ("LEC") in each market where the Company plans to offer
central office switched telecommunications services or that it will be able to
do so on favorable terms. In addition, the Company has experienced delays and
difficulties accessing inside wiring used or owned exclusively by the ILEC even
in circumstances where it has a Right of Entry. The failure to negotiate the
necessary interconnection agreements or gain access to inside wiring used or
owned exclusively by the ILEC could have a material adverse effect upon the
Company's ability to expand its telecommunication services. Currently, the
Company provides local telephone service as an STS provider in most of its
markets. STS providers generally use the ILEC's facilities (although in many
states CLECs can now supply STS operators with facilities) to provide local
telephone service as a reseller, subject to state regulation. If LECs were no
longer required to provide tariffed services to STS providers or if STS-type
service classifications were to be eliminated, the Company's telephone
operations could be materially adversely affected. The Company relies on the
services of a third-party vendor to provide certain
15
18
carrier-to-carrier billing services. The failure by such vendor to accurately
bill interexchange carriers' ("IXCs") access charges could have a material
adverse effect on the Company.
Uncertainties Related to Reciprocal Compensation. The Telecommunications
Act of 1996, as amended (the "Telecom Act"), requires ILECs to provide
reciprocal compensation to other carriers for local traffic terminated on such
other carrier's network. Notwithstanding this requirement, a number of ILECs
have taken the position that traffic terminated to Internet service providers
("ISPs") is not local traffic. Competitive carriers generally have been
successful in challenging this position before the public utility commissions
("PUCs") in several states. However, this issue is under consideration and
subject to review at the Federal Communications Commission (the "FCC"), various
state PUCs and state and federal courts. There can be no assurance that traffic
terminated to an ISP will not ultimately be held to be exempt from the
reciprocal compensation requirements.
Uncertainties Related to Access Charges. The Company charges IXCs "access
charges" for the right to terminate and originate traffic on the Company's local
network. The Company depends in substantial part upon these access charges to
defray the costs of its network build-out. At least one IXC has questioned the
reasonableness of the Company's access rate and has refused to pay any access
rate greater than that charged by the ILEC in the same local calling area.
Although the Company expects to prevail in this dispute, there can be no
assurance that the Company's access rates will not now, or in the future, be
found to be unreasonable, or that regulatory or market forces will not compel
the Company to lower its access rates, which could, in either case, materially
adversely affect the profitability or the speed of deployment of the Company's
local telephone network.
Potential 911, E-911 and Intrusion Alarm Liability. The Company delivers
local exchange service, including access to emergency ("911") services, to MDU
residents through either its central office switches or PBX switches installed
by the Company at each property. Mechanical or electrical defects, power
failures or catastrophic events may temporarily disrupt operation of the
Company's switches, preventing, delaying or impeding access to 911 service. In
many jurisdictions, telecommunications carriers are required to implement
services which permits a 911 operator to immediately identify the location of
the caller ("E-911 service"). To provide E-911 service at an MDU, the
telecommunications service provider or its agent must maintain a database with
certain information relating to the MDU residents. The failure of the Company or
its agent to maintain such database in a timely and accurate manner could
prevent, delay or impede the operation of E-911 service. In addition, because of
the configuration of the Company's telecommunications networks, the Company's
telecommunications traffic may cross more than one E-911 jurisdiction. This will
require the Company to coordinate among these various jurisdictions. There can
be no assurance that the Company will not be liable for damage to property or
personal injuries that may directly or indirectly result from any failure of 911
or E-911 service to operate properly. Moreover, the Company may provide 911,
E-911 or operator services by contracting such services from other carriers in
its markets. The providers of these services will generally require the Company
to indemnify them for any losses or liability incurred in connection with such
services except for those caused exclusively by the gross negligence or
malfeasance of the carrier. In addition, the Company currently provides certain
intrusion alarm services through subcontractors. There can be no assurance that
the Company will not be liable for any property damage or personal injuries that
may result from intrusion alarm malfunctions or from a subcontractor's failure
to appropriately monitor the intrusion alarm systems under contract.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH RIGHTS OF ENTRY
The Company's business depends upon its ability to enter into and exploit
favorable new long-term Rights of Entry for demographically attractive MDUs and
to exploit and renew its existing Rights of Entry. Its success in doing so may
be affected by a number of factors, including (i) the extent of competition in
the provision of multichannel television and telecommunications services, (ii)
its ability to identify suitable MDUs and contract with their owners, (iii) the
continuing demographic attractiveness of the markets in which the Company has
chosen to focus its business, (iv) occupancy rates in the MDUs to which it
provides services, (v) its ability to maintain superior levels of customer
service, (vi) the absence of material adverse regulatory developments and (vii)
the enforceability of the material terms of its Rights of Entry, including
16
19
exclusivity provisions. Although the Company does not believe that any of its
existing arrangements will be cancelled or will not be renewed as needed in the
near future, cancellation or non-renewal of certain of such arrangements could
materially adversely affect the Company's business in any such affected area. In
addition, the failure by the Company to enter into and maintain any such
arrangements for a particular network which is already under development may
affect the Company's ability to acquire or develop that network. See
"Business -- Competition" and "-- Regulation."
The Company's Rights of Entry generally provide that the Company will have
the exclusive right to provide residents within the applicable MDU with
multichannel television services and, where Rights of Entry extend to
telecommunications services, an undertaking by the MDU owner to promote OpTel as
the preferred telecommunications alternative to the ILEC. While the Company
believes that the exclusivity provisions in its cable television Rights of Entry
are now generally enforceable under applicable law, current trends at the state
and federal level suggest that the future enforceability of these provisions may
be uncertain. Certain states in which the Company operates, including Illinois
and Florida (for condominiums only), and certain cities and municipalities in
states in which the Company operates, have adopted "mandatory access" laws that
provide that no resident of an MDU may be denied access to programming provided
by incumbent franchise cable systems, regardless of any rights granted by an MDU
owner to another multichannel television operator. Texas has adopted a
"mandatory access" law for state certified telecommunications service providers.
In addition, Virginia prohibits private cable television operators from entering
into revenue sharing or up front incentive payment arrangements with MDU owners.
The ICS Operations included several MDUs located in Virginia. Further, the FCC
has initiated a notice of proposed rule making seeking comment on whether the
FCC should adopt regulations restricting exclusive contracts. While the
constitutionality of present "mandatory access" laws is uncertain, there can be
no assurance that such laws will not be adopted elsewhere or upheld as
constitutional which may have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business. Broad mandatory access would likely increase the Company's capital
costs associated with new Rights of Entry if installing duplicate wiring were
required and result in competitive services being offered at MDUs where the
Company presently has exclusive rights of entry. See "-- Regulation."
In a number of instances individual Rights of Entry are subordinate by
their terms to indebtedness secured by the MDU, with the effect that enforcement
of the security interest or default under such indebtedness could result in
termination of such Right of Entry. Bankruptcy of an MDU owner could also result
in rejection of a Right of Entry as an "executory contract." Moreover, the terms
of a number of the Company's Rights of Entry require it to remain competitive
with other competitors in that market in general or competitive in terms of
price of offering, technology, number of programming channels and levels of
service. To meet these requirements, the Company could be required to upgrade
its networks and equipment, which would require capital expenditures. The
failure to remain competitive under any of these standards in a market could
result in a loss or cancellation of the related Right of Entry. Such losses or
cancellations could, in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business. See "Business -- Strategic Relationships with MDU Owners."
DISTANCE AND WEATHER LIMITATIONS; LINE OF SIGHT; AVAILABILITY OF TRANSMISSION
SITES
Point-to-point microwave transmission requires a direct line of sight
between two dishes comprising a link and is subject to distance and rain
attenuation. The Company expects that its average coverage radius of Network
Hubs will be approximately five miles, depending on local conditions, and it is
expected that the Company's Network Hubs will utilize power control to increase
signal strength and mitigate the effects of rain attenuation. In areas of heavy
rainfall, transmission links are engineered for shorter distances and greater
power to maintain transmission quality. The reduction of path link distances to
maintain transmission quality may increase the cost of service coverage. While
these increased costs may not be significant in all cases, such costs may render
point-to-point microwave transmissions uneconomical in certain circumstances.
Due to line of sight limitations, the Company currently plans to install
its dishes and antennas on the rooftops of buildings and on other tall
structures. The Company expects generally to be able to construct intermediate
links or use other means to resolve line of sight and distance issues. However,
these limitations may render point-to-point links uneconomical in certain
locations.
17
20
The Company's microwave network expansion plans require the Company to
lease or otherwise obtain permission to install equipment at rooftop and tower
transmission sites in substantially all of its markets. The availability of
these sites is subject to market conditions and may be subject to zoning and
other municipal restrictions. The Company believes that as additional wireless
video and telecommunications providers emerge, competition for such transmission
sites will continue to increase. There can be no assurance that the necessary
sites will be available or that the terms upon which access to such sites may be
obtained will be acceptable.
RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES AND UNCERTAIN MARKET DEVELOPMENT
The multichannel television and telecommunications industries are subject
to rapid and significant changes in technology and frequent service innovations.
The effect on the business of the Company of future technological changes, such
as changes relating to emerging transmission technologies, cannot be predicted.
The Company believes that its future success will depend on its ability, as to
which no assurance can be given, to enhance its existing systems or implement
new systems to respond to new technologies and to develop and introduce in a
timely fashion new products and services on a competitive basis.
The markets in which the Company competes are constantly evolving. The
convergence of traditional telecommunications services and multichannel
television services is a recent trend in the industries within which the Company
competes. As part of this trend, many telecommunications and cable television
operators are attempting to integrate network components. For example, video
distribution equipment is being considered for voice and data telecommunications
and vice versa. The convergence of these traditional services towards integrated
multimedia services presents both opportunity and material risk to companies
such as OpTel. The Company will face enhanced competition from competitors with
greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources. Many of these
competitors may offer packages of services that are more extensive than the
services which the Company plans to offer. There can be no assurance that the
Company will be able to predict accurately the direction of this evolving market
or be able to respond effectively to the highly competitive environment. See
"-- Competition" and "Business -- Competition."
INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND AUTOMATION
The Company has ordered a new customer management information system which
is to be implemented during fiscal 1999 and which the Company expects to be an
important factor in its operations. If the customer management information
system is not implemented in a timely manner, or is not implemented at all or if
it fails or is unable to perform as expected, it could have a material adverse
effect on the Company. Furthermore, as the Company's business expands, problems
may be encountered with higher processing volumes or with additional automation
features, in which case the Company might experience system breakdowns, delays
and additional unbudgeted expense to remedy the defect or to replace the
defective system with an alternative system.
MANAGEMENT OF GROWTH AND DEPENDENCE ON QUALIFIED PERSONNEL
The Company is highly dependent upon the efforts of its senior management,
the loss of any of whom could impede the achievement of service delivery and
marketing objectives and could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
The Company has undertaken a rapid expansion of its networks and services. This
growth has increased the operating complexity of the Company as well as the
level of responsibility for both existing and new management personnel. The
Company's ability to manage its expansion effectively will require it to
continue to implement and improve its operational and financial systems and to
expand, train and manage its employee base and attract and retain highly skilled
and qualified personnel. Any failure by the Company to effectively manage its
growth and attract and retain qualified personnel could have a material adverse
effect on its business.
18
21
COMPETITION
OpTel competes with a wide range of service providers for each of the
services it provides. See "Business -- Competition." Substantially all markets
for voice and video services are highly competitive and the Company expects that
competition will intensify. In each of its markets, the Company faces
significant competition from larger companies with greater access to capital,
technology and other competitive resources. The Company's switched local
exchange services compete with ILECs, other STS providers, CLECs and competitive
access providers ("CAPs") and will compete with long distance telephone
companies and franchise cable television operators as they begin to enter the
local telephone business. The Company's long distance service competes with
established IXCs and resellers. In addition, recent telecommunications
offerings, including PCS, and future offerings may increase competition in the
telecommunications industry. The Company's private cable television services
compete with incumbent franchise cable television operators as well as wireless
cable television operators, other private cable television operators, DBS
operators and stand-alone satellite service providers. Recent and future
legislative, regulatory and technological developments likely will result in
additional competition, as telecommunications companies enter the cable
television market and as franchise cable television operators and IXCs begin to
enter the local telephone market. See "Business -- Regulation." Similarly,
mergers, joint ventures and alliances among franchise, wireless or private cable
television operators, regional Bell operating companies ("RBOCs") and IXCs may
result in providers capable of offering bundled cable television and
telecommunications services in direct competition with the Company.
The Company competes with multichannel television operators and
telecommunications service providers to obtain Rights of Entry and to enroll
subscribers. In most markets serviced by the Company, franchise cable television
operators now offer revenue sharing and access fee arrangements to MDU owners.
There can be no assurance that these payments will not increase in the future as
competition increases for access to the higher quality MDUs. Another basis of
competition is the breadth of programming and range of services offered.
Although the Company as a matter of course investigates new sources of
programming and technologies that may increase its range of services, other
larger and more diversified competitors may attract the targeted MDUs based on
their increased menu of services. There can be no assurance that the Company
will be able to compete successfully with existing competitors or new entrants
in the market for such services. See "Business -- Competition."
Competition also may be enhanced by technological developments that allow
competitors of the Company to bypass property owners altogether and market their
services directly to the tenants of MDUs. Although the Company's Rights of Entry
prohibit tenants from installing receiving equipment on the exterior of the
building, these provisions are not always enforced and do not prohibit tenants
from utilizing other services and technologies. For example, the Rights of Entry
do not prevent a resident from using cellular telephone service offered by
another provider. While the Company believes that the exclusivity provisions of
its Rights of Entry provide it with competitive advantages, such advantages may
be significantly diminished by technological, regulatory and other developments
beyond the control of the Company. Such developments may impact the Company's
strategies and may require it to expend funds beyond the levels currently
contemplated.
As an emerging CLEC in each of its markets, OpTel faces significant
competition for the local exchange services it offers from ILECs which currently
dominate their local telecommunications markets. ILECs have longstanding
relationships with their customers, which relationships may create competitive
barriers. Furthermore, ILECs may have the potential to subsidize competitive
service from monopoly service revenues. OpTel believes that various legislative
initiatives, including the Telecom Act have removed most of the remaining
legislative barriers to local exchange competition. Nevertheless, in light of
the passage of the Telecom Act, regulators also are likely to provide ILECs with
increased pricing flexibility as competition increases. If ILECs are permitted
to lower their rates substantially or engage in excessive volume or term
discount pricing practices for their customers, the net income or cash flow of
ICPs and CLECs, including OpTel, could be materially adversely affected. In
addition, while OpTel currently competes with AT&T, Inc. ("AT&T"), MCI
Telecommunications Corporation ("MCI") and others in the interexchange services
market, recent federal legislation permits the RBOCs to provide interexchange
services once certain criteria are met. Once
19
22
the RBOCs begin to provide such services, they will be in a position to offer
single source telecommunications service similar to that being offered by OpTel.
On December 31, 1997, a Federal District Court in Texas found unconstitutional
certain provisions of the Telecom Act restricting the RBOCs from offering long
distance service in their operating regions until they could demonstrate that
their networks have been made available to competitive providers of local
exchange services in those regions. This decision has been stayed pending
appeal. If this decision is permitted to stand, it could result in RBOCs
providing interexchange service in their operating regions sooner than
previously expected. In addition, AT&T and MCI have entered, and other IXCs have
announced their intent to enter, the local exchange services market, which is
facilitated by the Telecom Act's resale and unbundled network element
provisions. OpTel cannot predict the number of competitors that will emerge as a
result of existing or new federal and state regulatory or legislative actions.
Competition from the RBOCs with respect to interexchange services or from AT&T,
MCI or others with respect to local exchange services could have a material
adverse effect on OpTel's business. In addition, a continuing trend toward
business combinations and alliances in the telecommunications industry may
create significant new competitors for OpTel. Many of OpTel's existing and
potential competitors have financial, personnel and other resources
significantly greater than those of OpTel.
DEPENDENCE UPON PROGRAM MATERIAL
The Company has fixed-term contracts with various program suppliers. The
average term of such contracts is approximately five years and such contracts
are typically renewed upon expiration. If the contracts were terminated or not
renewed, the Company would be required to seek program material from other
sources, which could place the Company at a competitive disadvantage. Although
federal law and FCC regulations require that vertically integrated franchise
cable television system operators and cable television programmers sell
programming to other video distributors, such as the Company, on fair and
non-discriminatory terms, the Company has been denied certain popular sports
programming by certain providers who claim that the programming is not required
to be licensed to the Company. These denials have adversely impacted, and any
such denials in the future could adversely impact, the Company's activities in
the affected markets. There can be no assurance that the equal program access
laws and regulations will not be invalidated, changed or repealed, which could
limit the Company's ability to obtain programming or raise the cost of
programming. In addition, one aspect of the equal program access laws, the
prohibition on the sale of exclusive distribution rights by certain programmers,
is scheduled to expire on October 5, 2002, unless the FCC finds, during a
proceeding to be conducted in 2001, that the prohibition continues to be
necessary to promote competition in the multichannel television market. See
"Business -- Regulation."
REGULATION
The cable television and telecommunications industries are subject to
extensive regulation at the federal, state and local levels. Many aspects of
regulation at the federal, state and local levels currently are subject to
judicial review or are the subject of administrative or legislative proposals to
modify, repeal, or adopt new laws and administrative regulations and policies,
the results of which the Company is unable to predict. The United States
Congress and the FCC have in the past, and may in the future, adopt new laws,
regulations and policies regarding a wide variety of matters, including
rulemakings arising as a result of the Telecom Act, that could, directly or
indirectly, affect the operation of the Company's business. The business
prospects of the Company could be materially adversely affected (i) by the
application of current FCC rules or policies in a manner leading to the denial
of applications by the Company for FCC licenses or a change in the regulatory
status of the Company's private cable television and telecommunications
operations, (ii) by the adoption of new laws, policies or regulations, (iii) by
changes in existing laws, policies or regulations, including changes to their
interpretations or applications, that modify the present regulatory environment
or (iv) by the failure of certain rules or policies to change in the manner
anticipated by the Company. See "Business -- Regulation."
The Company believes that its exclusive Rights of Entry are now generally
enforceable under applicable law; however, current trends at the state and
federal level suggest that the future enforceability of these provisions may be
uncertain. The FCC is seeking comment on whether such exclusive contracts should
be limited to a maximum period of seven years and whether such an amount of time
is reasonably necessary to
20
23
recover the capital costs of providing service to that MDU. In another
proceeding, the FCC is seeking comment on the legal, technical and practical
issues relating to whether the FCC should issue a rule preempting state, local
and private restrictions on over-the-air reception antennas placed on rental
properties or properties not within the exclusive control of the viewer.
Although it is open to question whether the FCC has statutory and constitutional
authority to compel mandatory access or preempt private restrictions on antennas
located on property owned or controlled by others, there can be no assurance
that it will not attempt to do so. Any such action would tend to undermine the
exclusivity provisions of the Company's Rights of Entry. See "-- Risks
Associated with Rights of Entry." There can be no assurance that future state or
federal laws or regulations will not restrict the ability of the Company to
offer revenue sharing or access payments, limit MDU owners from receiving
revenue sharing or prohibit MDU owners from entering into exclusive access
agreements, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business. See "Business -- Sales and Marketing," "-- Strategic Relationships
with MDU Owners" and "-- Regulation."
The Company uses a substantial number of point-to-point microwave paths,
using frequencies in the 18GHz band, in its network architecture. In addition,
the Company intends to obtain licenses for paths in other frequency bands,
principally in the 23GHz band, in the future. The 18GHz, 23GHz and other
frequency bands are licensed by the FCC. After paths are licensed by the FCC,
FCC rules require that facilities utilizing such paths must be constructed and
fully operational within 18 months of the grant of the license. There can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to acquire licenses for the microwave
paths that it seeks in the future, or that changes in the FCC's regulations will
not limit the Company's ability to use the 18GHz, 23GHz or other desirable
frequencies for the distribution of its services, or otherwise impair the
Company's microwave licenses. If the Company cannot license the necessary paths
on the desired frequencies, it may be necessary to utilize other frequencies for
signal transport or other means of signal transport. There can be no assurance
that the cost of such alternate means of transport will not exceed those
associated with the desired microwave frequency. Further, even if the FCC grants
the desired licenses, the Company may not have the financial resources to
construct the necessary facilities within the mandated 18 month period. Failure
to complete the construction within the mandated period may result in forfeiture
of the license. In addition, state and local zoning and land use laws may impede
the efficient deployment of the Company's microwave antennas. Any of the
foregoing developments could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business. See "Business -- Network Architecture."
As an emerging CLEC, OpTel is subject to varying degrees of federal, state
and local regulation. OpTel is not currently subject to price cap or rate of
return regulation at the state or federal level. OpTel is, however, generally
subject to certification or registration and tariff or price list filing
requirements for intrastate services by state regulators. Although passage of
the Telecom Act should result in increased opportunities for companies that are
competing with the ILECs, no assurance can be given that changes in current or
future regulations adopted by the FCC or state regulators or other legislative
or judicial initiatives relating to the telecommunications industry would not
have a material adverse effect on OpTel. Moreover, while the Telecom Act reduces
regulation to which non-dominant LECs are subject, it also reduces the level of
regulation that applies to the ILECs and increases their ability to respond
quickly to competition from OpTel and others. In addition, the Telecom Act will
permit RBOCs, for the first time, to offer long distance service in the regions
where they provide local exchange service upon demonstrating to the FCC and
state regulatory agencies that they have complied with the FCC's interconnection
regulations designed to foster local exchange competition. While the FCC has not
approved the applications to provide in-region long distance service filed to
date, it may do so in the future. On December 31, 1997, a federal District Court
in Texas found unconstitutional the provisions of the Telecom Act restricting
RBOCs from providing long distance service in-region until they could
demonstrate that their networks have been made available to competitive
providers of local exchange services. The Court has stayed the decision and the
issue is under appeal but if the decision is upheld, RBOCs may be able to offer
in-region long distance service earlier than otherwise expected. RBOCs would
then be able to offer a combination of local and interexchange service to
customers in direct competition with OpTel's service offerings.
In addition, the FCC has put in place access charge reform rules which may
over time result in a net decrease in the access charges paid by IXCs to LECs
for originating or terminating long distance traffic. To
21
24
the extent ILECs are afforded increased pricing flexibility or access charges
are reduced, the ability of the Company to compete with ILECs for certain
services may be adversely affected. On May 8, 1997, the FCC issued an order
establishing a new Universal Service support fund. The new Universal Service
support fund rules will be administered jointly by the FCC and state regulatory
authorities, many of which rules are still in the process of being formulated.
The net revenue effect on the Company of these rules is incalculable at this
time.
The majority of states currently permit STS services with relatively few
regulatory barriers. However, several states require certification and place
some conditions or restraints on the provision of STS services. Additionally,
STS providers must comply with the conditions of service set forth in the LEC's
tariffs under which STS providers receive service. There can be no assurance
that the regulatory environment will continue to be favorable for STS providers
or that regulatory changes will not slow or stop the Company's planned migration
from an STS provider into a CLEC in each of its markets. Although the current
regulatory environment enables competition for local exchange services, there is
no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully against
established providers and new entrants in that marketplace. In addition, various
state and federal laws and regulations limit the Company's ability to enforce
exclusivity provisions of Rights of Entry so as to exclude other
telecommunications providers from an MDU.
CONTROL OF LICENSES BY UNAFFILIATED COMPANY
The Telecom Act prohibits any corporation directly or indirectly controlled
by any other corporation of which more than 25 percent of the capital stock is
owned or voted by non-U.S. citizens from holding a common carrier radio station
license absent a finding by the FCC that the grant of such a license to such a
licensee would serve the public interest. In 1997, the United States agreed, in
the context of the World Trade Organization ("WTO") Basic Telecom Agreement, to
allow foreign suppliers from WTO member nations, including Canada, to provide a
broad range of basic telecommunications services in the United States. Those
commitments became effective in February 1998. In light of those commitments,
the FCC has determined that it will adopt an "open entry standard" for suppliers
of telecommunications services from WTO member nations, including Canada. In
conjunction with its new open entry policies, the FCC has adopted a presumption
favoring grant of applications to exceed the 25 percent limit on non-U.S.
ownership described above when the non-U.S. investment is from a WTO member
nation. GVL, the Company's principal stockholder, is a Canadian corporation.
Prior to the recent developments described above, the Company assigned
substantially all of its frequency licenses to Transmissions Holding, Inc.
("THI"), a Delaware corporation controlled by United States citizens, to permit
the Company to use its frequency licenses to provide "common carrier"
telecommunications services in the event that the Company should desire to do
so. The Company has an option to purchase the assets (or the stock) of THI,
exercisable at any time, subject to FCC approval. THI is not an affiliate of the
Company. While the Company is in the process of reevaluating whether it should
hold FCC authorizations directly and, specifically, whether it should exercise
its option to purchase the assets or stock of THI, the current ownership of
these licenses by THI is subject to a number of risks, including the risk that
acts or omissions of THI or its stockholders could result in the revocation of
such licenses or the unavailability of such licenses to the Company and the risk
that THI may be subject to bankruptcy or similar proceedings which could result
in the rejection or termination of the arrangements between THI and the Company
with respect to the use of such licenses. While THI and its stockholders have
made various affirmative and negative covenants intended to limit the risk to
the Company, there can be no assurance that such covenants will not be violated
or will be adequate to protect the Company. See "Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions -- License Holding Company."
USE OF THE NAME OPTEL
On April 27, 1998, an action was commenced against the Company in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of California by Octel
Communications Corp. ("Octel"), charging the Company with trademark
infringement, trade name infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair
competition (the "Civil Action") based on its use of the name "OpTel" and
seeking to enjoin the Company from using the name and
22
25
trademark "OpTel." The Civil Action follows a now-suspended administrative
proceeding in the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO"), pending
since November 7, 1995, relating to registration of the "OpTel" mark by the
Company. The PTO found the Company's application for registration to be
allowable; however, Octel commenced an opposition proceeding claiming that the
Company's mark is confusingly similar to the "Octel" mark used by that party in
a related field, and claiming that the Company's application had procedural
deficiencies. During the course of the PTO proceeding, the Company acquired
rights to the marks "Optel" and "Optel Communications" in the telecommunications
field which are believed to predate the rights of Octel to its trademark, and
the Company commenced two further proceedings against Octel in the PTO seeking
cancellation of two trademark registrations held by Octel. The various
proceedings in the PTO between the Company and Octel were consolidated and
thereafter suspended on May 15, 1998, in view of the commencement of the Civil
Action. The Company believes it has meritorious counterclaims in the Civil
Action and intends to vigorously defend against Octel's claims. Although the
Company does not believe that its use of the name "OpTel" infringes on the
trademark rights or trade name rights of Octel or any other person, there can be
no assurance as to the outcome of the Civil Action or the proceedings in the PTO
(if reinstated) or that any such outcome would not materially adversely affect
the Company.
LATE FEES CLASS ACTION LITIGATION
On April 9, 1998, a purported class action complaint was filed in the
District Court of Harris County, Texas by Gavin Stewart Clarkson, individually
and on behalf of all cable subscribers in the U.S. that have paid late fees to
either the group of affiliated entities known as Phonoscope (collectively,
"Phonoscope") or the Company. The plaintiff, who formerly subscribed to cable
television services provided by Phonoscope, alleges that Phonoscope's charging
pre-established late fees for delinquent payments of cable subscription charges
constitutes an illegal collection of a penalty and that cable service providers
should only be entitled to their actual collection costs. The plaintiff seeks to
enjoin Phonoscope and OpTel from collecting, or attempting to collect, such late
fees. The case is in its very early stages, and no assurance can be given as to
its ultimate outcome or that any such outcome will not materially adversely
affect the Company. OpTel believes that it has meritorious factual and legal
defenses, and intends to defend vigorously against these claims.
CONTROL BY GVL
General. VPC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of GVL, owns 1,923,559
shares of the Company's Class B Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the
"Multi-Vote Common"), representing approximately 81% of the voting rights of the
Company. Accordingly, VPC can elect a majority of the Board of Directors of the
Company (the "Board") and control the vote on matters submitted to the vote of
the Company's stockholders. See "Description of Capital Stock."
Potentially Competing Ventures. In addition to its investment in the
Company, GVL, through other subsidiaries, currently holds interests in wireless
cable systems or licenses to operate wireless cable systems in a number of U.S.
markets including San Francisco, San Diego and Victorville, California and
Tampa, Florida. These subsidiaries employ multipoint multichannel distribution
systems ("MMDS"), satellite master antenna television ("SMATV") systems or hard
wire franchise cable television systems. As a result, affiliates of GVL may
compete with the Company in markets where their services overlap. In addition,
an affiliate of GVL has recently announced its intention to deliver high speed
Internet access in the San Francisco area. These services may compete with the
Company's high speed Internet offering.
GVL Indenture. GVL is party to an indenture which limits the aggregate
amount of indebtedness which can be incurred by GVL and its subsidiaries,
including the Company, taken as a whole (based upon a ratio of total
consolidated indebtedness to consolidated operating cash flow). As a result,
GVL's strategies and the operating results of its subsidiaries other than the
Company may affect the ability of the Company to incur additional indebtedness.
As of May 31, 1998, GVL was able to incur approximately Cdn $612 million
(approximately $390 million based on an exchange rate of $1.00 = Cdn $1.5683 as
reported by the Wall Street Journal on September 1, 1998) of indebtedness under
its indenture. There can be no assurance that this number may not decrease
substantially in the future. There can be no assurance that GVL will not
23
26
restrain the Company's growth or limit the indebtedness incurred by the Company
so as to ensure GVL's compliance with the terms of its debt instruments.
Stockholders' Agreement. GVL, VPC, CDPQ, a subsidiary of Caisse, a Quebec
financial institution and minority shareholder of GVL, and the Company are
parties to a Stockholders' Agreement, dated as of August 15, 1997 (the
"Stockholders' Agreement"), pursuant to which, among other things, CDPQ was
granted veto rights with respect to certain material transactions (including
material acquisitions and the incurrence of certain additional indebtedness),
the right to elect certain directors of OpTel, preemptive rights to acquire new
securities issued by the Company subject to certain exceptions (including a
registered public offering) and tag along rights upon the sale by VPC of its
interest in OpTel. In addition, CDPQ agreed to certain restrictions on the
transfer of its shares of Multi-Vote Common. See "Principal Stockholders --
Stockholders' Agreement."
Change of Control Under the Indentures. A transfer by VPC of its interest
in OpTel or a transfer by GVL of its interest in VPC or an election by VPC to
convert its Multi-Vote Common into shares of Class A Common Stock may result in
a "Change of Control" under the Indentures, which could require the Company to
offer to purchase the 1998 Notes and the 1997 Notes. There can be no assurance
that the Company would have the financial resources to meet this obligation.
Neither VPC nor GVL is under any obligation to prevent a "Change of Control."
The occurrence of a "Change of Control" could have a material adverse effect on
the Company, including the loss of GVL's strategic involvement with the Company.
YEAR 2000 RISK
OpTel has implemented a Year 2000 program to ensure that its computer
systems and applications will function properly beyond 1999. OpTel believes that
it has allocated adequate resources for this purpose and expects its Year 2000
conversion program to be successfully completed on a timely basis. However,
successful completion of the Year 2000 conversion program is substantially
dependent upon successful implementation of the Company's new customer
management information system. The Company's financial accounting system has not
been upgraded to eliminate potential Year 2000 related malfunctions. The Company
has selected a new financial accounting system and plans to have the new system
implemented within the next 12 months. There can be no assurance that the new
customer management information system and financial accounting system will be
implemented on schedule or that other components of the Year 2000 conversion
program will be completed in a timely manner. See "-- Information Systems and
Automation." Other than expenses relating to the acquisition of the customer
management information system and the financial accounting system, OpTel does
not expect to incur significant expenditures to address this issue. The ability
of third parties with which OpTel transacts business to adequately address their
Year 2000 issues is outside of OpTel's control. There can be no assurance that
the failure of OpTel or such third parties to adequately address their
respective Year 2000 issues will not have a material adverse effect on OpTel's
business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
BANKRUPTCY RISKS RELATED TO ESCROW ACCOUNT
The right of the Trustee under the Indenture and the Escrow Agreement (as
defined) to foreclose upon and sell the Escrow Collateral (as defined) upon the
occurrence of an Event of Default (as defined) on the 1998 Notes is likely to be
significantly impaired by applicable bankruptcy law if a bankruptcy or
reorganization case were to be commenced by or against the Company or one or
more of its subsidiaries. Under applicable bankruptcy law, secured creditors,
such as the holders of the 1998 Series B Notes, are prohibited from foreclosing
upon or disposing of a debtor's property without prior bankruptcy court
approval. In addition, the Escrow Collateral has been pledged to secure the 1997
Notes and the 1998 Notes on an equal and ratable basis so that, in the event of
a foreclosure upon the Escrow Collateral prior to the second scheduled interest
payment (when the escrow arrangement terminates), the proceeds thereof would be
available to satisfy claims of both holders of the 1998 Notes and the 1997
Notes. See "Description of the 1998 Series B Notes -- Disbursement of Funds;
Escrow Account."
24
27
CERTAIN TAX CONSIDERATIONS
For a discussion of certain material federal income tax considerations
which are relevant to the exchange of the 1998 Series A Notes for the 1998
Series B Notes, see "Certain Federal Income Tax Considerations."
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
The statements contained in this Prospectus that are not historical facts
are "forward-looking statements" (as such term is defined in the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995), which can be identified by the use of
forward-looking terminology such as "estimates," "projects," "anticipates,"
"expects," "intends," "believes" or the negative thereof or other variations
thereon or comparable terminology or by discussions of strategy that involve
risks and uncertainties. Management wishes to caution the reader that these
forward-looking statements are only estimates or predictions. No assurance can
be given that future results will be achieved. Actual events or results may
differ materially as a result of risks facing OpTel or actual events differing
from the assumptions underlying such statements. All forward-looking statements
made in connection with this Prospectus which are attributable to OpTel or
persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these
cautionary statements.
25
28
THE EXCHANGE OFFER
PURPOSE OF THE EXCHANGE OFFER
The 1998 Series A Notes were originally issued and sold on July 7, 1998 in
reliance upon the exemptions from registration under Rule 144A and Regulation S
of the Securities Act. Pursuant to the Registration Agreement, the Company
agreed to register with the Commission a series of notes with substantially
identical terms as the 1998 Series A Notes, to be offered in exchange for the
1998 Series A Notes. The purpose of the Exchange Offer is to satisfy the
Company's obligations under the Registration Agreement. Upon consummation of the
Exchange Offer, holders that were not prohibited from participating in the
Exchange Offer and did not tender their 1998 Series A Notes will not have any
registration rights under the Registration Agreement with respect to such
non-tendered 1998 Series A Notes and, accordingly, such 1998 Series A Notes will
continue to be subject to the restrictions on transfer contained in the legend
thereon.
TERMS OF THE EXCHANGE
The Company is offering to exchange, subject to the conditions set forth in
this Prospectus and in the Letter of Transmittal accompanying this Prospectus,
the same principal amount of 1998 Series B Notes for the 1998 Series A Notes
tendered for exchange. The terms of the 1998 Series B Notes will be
substantially identical to the 1998 Series A Notes in all material respects
(including interest rate and maturity), except that (i) the 1998 Series B Notes
will not be subject to the restrictions on transfer (other than with respect to
holders who are affiliates) and (ii) the Registration Agreement covenants
regarding registration and the related Liquidated Damages (other than those that
have accrued and were not paid) with respect to Registration Defaults (as
defined) will have been deemed satisfied. The 1998 Series B Notes will evidence
the same debt as the 1998 Series A Notes and will be entitled to the benefits of
the Indenture. See "Description of the 1998 Series B Notes." The Exchange Offer
is not conditioned upon any minimum aggregate principal amount of 1998 Series A
Notes being tendered for exchange.
The Company believes that 1998 Series B Notes received in exchange for 1998
Series A Notes may be offered for sale, sold and otherwise transferred by any
holder (other than any holder which is an "affiliate" of the Company within the
meaning of Rule 405 under the Securities Act) without compliance with the
registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act,
provided that the 1998 Series B Notes are acquired in the ordinary course of the
holder's business, the holder has no arrangement or understanding with any
person to participate in the distribution of the 1998 Series B Notes and neither
the holder nor any other person is engaging in or intends to engage in a
distribution of the 1998 Series B Notes. Any holder who tenders in the Exchange
Offer for the purpose of participating in a public distribution of the 1998
Series B Notes must comply with the registration and prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act in connection with the distribution. Each
broker-dealer that receives 1998 Series B Notes for its own account in exchange
for 1998 Series A Notes, where such 1998 Series A Notes were acquired by such
broker-dealer as a result of market-making activities or other trading
activities, must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection
with any resale of such 1998 Series B Notes. Broker-dealers may not exchange the
1998 Series A Notes which are part of an unsold original allotment in the
Exchange Offer.
Tendering holders of the 1998 Series A Notes will not be required to pay
brokerage commissions or fees or, subject to the instructions in the Letter of
Transmittal, transfer taxes with respect to the Exchange Offer.
EXPIRATION DATE; EXTENSIONS, TERMINATION; AMENDMENT
The Exchange Offer will expire on the Expiration Date. The term "Expiration
Date" means 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on , 1998 or such later
date and time, if any, to which it is extended by the Company. In connection
with the Exchange Offer, the Company will comply with all applicable
requirements of the federal securities laws, including, but not limited to, Rule
14e-1 under the Exchange Act (as defined).
The Exchange Date will be the first business day following the Expiration
Date. The Company expressly reserves the right to (i) terminate the Exchange
Offer and not accept for exchange any 1998 Series A Notes if either of the
events set forth under "Conditions to the Exchange Offer" shall have occurred
and shall not have
26
29
been waived by the Company and (ii) amend the terms of the Exchange Offer in any
manner which, in its good faith judgment, is advantageous to the holders of the
1998 Series A Notes, whether before or after any tender of the 1998 Series A
Notes. Unless the Company terminates the Exchange Offer prior to 5:00 p.m., New
York City time, on the Expiration Date, the Company will exchange the 1998
Series B Notes for the 1998 Series A Notes on the Exchange Date.
PROCEDURES FOR TENDERING 1998 SERIES A NOTES
The Exchange Offer is subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this
Prospectus and the Letter of Transmittal.
The 1998 Series A Notes may be tendered by properly completing and signing
the Letter of Transmittal and delivering the Letter of Transmittal, to the
Exchange Agent at its address set forth in this Prospectus on or prior to the
Expiration Date, together with (i) the certificate or certificates, if any,
representing the 1998 Series A Notes being tendered and any required signature
guarantees, (ii) a timely confirmation of a book-entry transfer (a "Book-Entry
Confirmation") of the 1998 Series A Notes, if such procedure is available, into
the Exchange Agent's account at The Depository Trust Company (the "Book-Entry
Transfer Facility" or "Depository") pursuant to the procedure for book-entry
transfer described below or (iii) the completion of the procedures for
guaranteed delivery set forth below. See "-- Guaranteed Delivery Procedures."
If the 1998 Series B Notes (and any untendered 1998 Series A Notes) are to
be issued in the name of the registered holder and the registered holder has
signed the Letter of Transmittal the holder's signature need not be guaranteed.
In any other case, the tendered 1998 Series A Notes must be endorsed or
accompanied by written instruments of transfer in form satisfactory to the
Exchange Agent and duly executed by the registered holder and the signature on
the endorsement or instrument of transfer must be guaranteed by a commercial
bank or trust company located or having an office or correspondent in the United
States or by a member firm of a national securities exchange or of the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (an "Eligible Institution"). If the 1998
Series B Notes and/or 1998 Series A Notes not exchanged are to be delivered to
an address other than that of the registered holder appearing on the register
for the 1998 Series A Notes, the signature on the Letter of Transmittal must be
guaranteed by an Eligible Institution.
THE METHOD OF DELIVERY OF 1998 SERIES A NOTES, LETTERS OF TRANSMITTAL AND
ALL OTHER DOCUMENTS IS AT THE ELECTION AND RISK OF THE HOLDER. IF SENT BY MAIL,
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT REGISTERED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, BE USED,
PROPER INSURANCE OBTAINED, AND THE MAILING BE MADE SUFFICIENTLY IN ADVANCE OF
THE EXPIRATION DATE TO PERMIT DELIVERY TO THE EXCHANGE AGENT ON OR BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE. NO LETTERS OF TRANSMITTAL OR 1998 SERIES A NOTES SHOULD BE SENT
TO THE COMPANY.
A tender will be deemed to have been received as of the date when the
tendering holder's properly completed and duly signed Letter of Transmittal, the
1998 Series A Notes or a Book-Entry Confirmation and all other required
documents are received by the Exchange Agent.
All questions as to the validity, form, eligibility (including time of
receipt) and acceptance for exchange of any tender of 1998 Series A Notes will
be determined by the Company in its sole discretion, which determination will be
final and binding. The Company reserves the right to reject any or all tenders
not in proper form or the acceptance for exchange of which may, in the opinion
of the Company's counsel, be unlawful. The Company also reserves the right to
waive any of the conditions of the Exchange Offer or any defect, withdrawal,
rejection of tender or irregularity in the tender of any 1998 Series A Notes.
Neither the Company, the Exchange Agent nor any other person will be under any
duty to give notification of any defects, withdrawals, rejections or
irregularities or incur any liability for failure to give any such notification.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
The Letter of Transmittal contains, among other things, the following terms
and conditions, which are part of the Exchange Offer.
27
30
The holder tendering 1998 Series A Notes exchanges, assigns and transfers
the 1998 Series A Notes to the Company and irrevocably constitutes and appoints
the Exchange Agent as the holder's agent and attorney-in-fact to cause the 1998
Series A Notes to be assigned, transferred and exchanged. The holder represents
and warrants to the Company and the Exchange Agent that (i) it has full power
and authority to tender, exchange, assign and transfer the 1998 Series A Notes
and to acquire 1998 Series B Notes in exchange for the 1998 Series A Notes, (ii)
when the 1998 Series A Notes are accepted for exchange, the Company will acquire
good and unencumbered title to the 1998 Series A Notes, free and clear of all
liens, restrictions, charges and encumbrances and not subject to any adverse
claim, (iii) it will, upon request, execute and deliver any additional documents
deemed by the Company to be necessary or desirable to complete the exchange,
assignment and transfer of tendered 1998 Series A Notes and (iv) acceptance of
any tendered 1998 Series A Notes by the Company and the issuance of 1998 Series
B Notes in exchange therefor will constitute performance in full by the Company
of its obligations under the Registration Agreement and that the Company will
have no further obligations or liabilities thereunder (except with respect to
accrued and unpaid Liquidated Damages, if any). All authority conferred by the
holder will survive the death or incapacity of the holder and every obligation
of the holder shall be binding upon the heirs, legal representatives, successors
assigns, executors and administrators of the holder.
Each holder will also certify that it (i) is not an "affiliate" of the
Company within the meaning of Rule 405 under the Securities Act or that, if it
is an "affiliate," it will comply with the registration and prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act to the extent applicable, (ii) is acquiring
the 1998 Series B Notes offered in the ordinary course of its business, (iii)
has no arrangement with any person to participate in the distribution of the
1998 Series B Notes and (iv) is not a broker-dealer, or that if it is a
broker-dealer, the 1998 Series A Notes tendered for exchange are not part of an
unsold allotment from the Offering.
WITHDRAWAL RIGHTS
The 1998 Series A Notes tendered pursuant to the Exchange Offer may be
withdrawn at any time prior to the Expiration Date.
To be effective, a written notice of withdrawal must be timely received by
the Exchange Agent at its address set forth in this Prospectus by mail, courier
or telegraphic, telex or facsimile transmission. Any notice of withdrawal must
specify the person named in the Letter of Transmittal as having tendered 1998
Series A Notes to be withdrawn, the certificate numbers of 1998 Series A Notes
to be withdrawn, the principal amount of 1998 Series A Notes to be withdrawn, a
statement that the holder is withdrawing its election to tender the 1998 Series
A Notes for exchange, and the name of the registered holder of the 1998 Series A
Notes, and must be signed by the holder in the same manner as the original
signature on the Letter of Transmittal (including any required signature
guarantees) or be accompanied by evidence satisfactory to the Exchange Agent
that the person withdrawing the tender has succeeded to the beneficial ownership
of the 1998 Series A Notes being withdrawn. The Exchange Agent will return the
properly withdrawn 1998 Series A Notes promptly following receipt of notice of
withdrawal. If the 1998 Series A Notes have been tendered pursuant to a
book-entry transfer, any notice of withdrawal must specify the name and number
of the account at the Book-Entry Transfer Facility to be credited with the
withdrawn 1998 Series A Notes and otherwise comply with the procedures of the
Book-Entry Transfer Facility. All questions as to the validity of notices of
withdrawals, including time of receipt, will be determined by the Company, and
such determination will be final and binding on all parties. Any 1998 Series A
Notes which have been tendered for exchange but which are not exchanged will be
returned to the holder thereof without cost to the holder (or, in the case of
1998 Series A Notes tendered by book-entry transfer by crediting an account
maintained with the Book-Entry Transfer Facility for the 1998 Series A Notes) as
soon as practicable after withdrawal, rejection of tender or termination of the
Exchange Offer. Properly withdrawn 1998 Series A Notes may be re-tendered at any
time on or prior to the Expiration Date. Any 1998 Series A Notes so withdrawn
and not re-tendered will not be exchanged for 1998 Series B Notes under the
Exchange Offer.
28
31
ACCEPTANCE OF 1998 SERIES A NOTES FOR EXCHANGE; DELIVERY OF 1998 SERIES B NOTES
Upon terms and subject to the conditions of the Exchange Offer, the
acceptance for exchange of 1998 Series A Notes validly tendered and not
withdrawn and issuance of the 1998 Series B Notes will be made on the Exchange
Date. For the purposes of the Exchange Offer, the Company shall be deemed to
have accepted for exchange validly tendered 1998 Series A Notes when, as and if
the Company has given oral or written notice thereof to the Exchange Agent.
The Exchange Agent will act as agent for the tendering holders of 1998
Series A Notes for the purpose of causing the 1998 Series A Notes to be
assigned, transferred and exchanged for 1998 Series B Notes. Upon the terms and
subject to the conditions of the Exchange Offer, delivery of 1998 Series B Notes
in exchange for 1998 Series A Notes will be made by the Exchange Agent promptly
after acceptance of the tendered 1998 Series A Notes by the Company. Tendered
1998 Series A Notes not accepted for exchange by the Company will be returned
without expense to the tendering holders (or, in the case of 1998 Series A Notes
tendered by book-entry transfer crediting an account maintained with the
Depository) promptly following the Expiration Date or, if the Company terminates
the Exchange Offer prior to the Expiration Date, promptly after the Exchange
Offer is terminated.
BOOK-ENTRY TRANSFER
The Exchange Agent will establish an account at the Book-Entry Transfer
Facility for purposes of the Exchange Offer within two business days after the
date of this Prospectus, and any financial institution that is a participant in
the Book-Entry Transfer Facility's systems may make book-entry delivery of 1998
Series A Notes by causing the Book-Entry Transfer Facility to transfer the 1998
Series A Notes into the Exchange Agent's account at the Book-Entry Transfer
Facility in accordance with the Book-Entry Transfer Facility's procedure for
transfer. The Letter of Transmittal with any required signature guarantees and
any other required documents, must be received by the Exchange Agent on or prior
to the Expiration Date for any book-entry transfers.
GUARANTEED DELIVERY PROCEDURES
Holders who wish to tender their 1998 Series A Notes and (i) whose 1998
Series A Notes are not immediately available or (ii) who cannot deliver their
1998 Series A Notes, the Letter of Transmittal or any other documents required
hereby to the Exchange Agent prior to the Expiration Date must tender their 1998
Series A Notes and follow the guaranteed delivery procedures. Pursuant to such
procedures: (i) such tender must be made by or through an Eligible Institution;
(ii) prior to the Expiration Date, the Exchange Agent must have received from
the Eligible Institution a properly completed and duly executed Notice of
Guaranteed Delivery ("Notice of Guaranteed Delivery") (by facsimile
transmission, mail or hand delivery) setting forth the name and address of the
holder of the 1998 Series A Notes, the certificate number or numbers of such
1998 Series A Notes and the principal amount of 1998 Series A Notes tendered,
stating that the tender is being made thereby and guaranteeing that, within five
business days after the Expiration Date, the Letter of Transmittal (or facsimile
thereof) together with the certificate(s) representing the 1998 Series A Notes
(or a confirmation of electronic delivery of book-entry delivery into the
Exchange Agent's account at the Depository) and any of the required documents
will be deposited by the Eligible Institution with the Exchange Agent; and (iii)
such properly completed and executed Letter of Transmittal (or facsimile
hereof), as well as all other documents required by the Letter of Transmittal
and the certificate(s) representing all tendered 1998 Series A Notes in proper
form for transfer (or a confirmation of electronic mail delivery or book-entry
delivery into the Exchange Agent's account at the Depository) must be received
by the Exchange Agent within five business days after Expiration Date. Any
holder of 1998 Series A Notes who wishes to tender his 1998 Series A Notes
pursuant to the guaranteed delivery procedures described above must ensure that
the Exchange Agent receives the Notice of Guaranteed Delivery prior to 5:00
P.M., New York City time, on the Expiration Date.
29
32
CONDITIONS TO THE EXCHANGE OFFER
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Exchange Offer, the Company will
not be required to issue 1998 Series B Notes in exchange for any properly
tendered 1998 Series A Notes not previously accepted and may terminate the
Exchange Offer (by oral or written notice to the holders and by timely public
announcement communicated, unless otherwise required by applicable law or
regulation, by making a release to the Dow Jones News Service), or, at its
option, modify or otherwise amend the Exchange Offer, if any of the following
events occur:
(a) there shall be threatened, instituted or pending any action or
proceeding before, or any injunction, order or decree shall have been
issued by, any court or governmental agency or other governmental
regulatory or administrative agency or commission (i) seeking to restrain
or prohibit the making or consummation of the Exchange Offer or any other
transaction contemplated by the Exchange Offer, or assessing or seeking any
damages as a result thereof, or (ii) resulting in a material delay in the
ability of the Company to accept for exchange or exchange some or all of
the 1998 Series A Notes pursuant to the Exchange Offer, or any statute,
rule, regulation, order or injunction shall be sought, proposed,
introduced, enacted, promulgated or deemed applicable to the Exchange Offer
or any of the transactions contemplated by the Exchange Offer by any
government or governmental authority, domestic or foreign, or any action
shall have been taken, proposed or threatened, by any government,
governmental authority, agency or court, domestic or foreign, that in the
sole judgment of the Company might directly or indirectly result in any of
the consequences referred to in clause (i) or (ii) above or, in the sole
judgment of the Company, might result in the holders of 1998 Series B Notes
having obligations with respect to resales and transfers of 1998 Series B
Notes which are greater than those described in the interpretation of the
Commission referred to on the cover page of this Prospectus, or would
otherwise make it inadvisable to proceed with the Exchange Offer; or
(b) any change (or any development involving a prospective change)
shall have occurred or be threatened in the business, properties, assets,
liabilities, financial condition, operations, results of operations or
prospects of the Company, taken as a whole, that, in the sole judgment of
the Company is or may be adverse to the Company, or the Company shall have
become aware of facts that, in the sole judgment of the Company, have or
may have adverse significance with respect to the value of the 1998 Series
A Notes or the 1998 Series B Notes; which, in the sole judgment of the
Company in any case, and regardless of the circumstances (including any
action by the Company) giving rise to any such condition, makes it unlawful
to proceed with the Exchange Offer and/or with such acceptance for exchange
or with such exchange.
The Company expressly reserves the right to terminate the Exchange Offer
and not accept for exchange any 1998 Series A Notes upon the occurrence of any
of the foregoing conditions (which represent all of the material conditions to
the acceptance by the Company of properly tendered 1998 Series A Notes). In
addition, the Company may amend the Exchange Offer at any time prior to the
Expiration Date if any of the conditions set forth above occur. Moreover,
regardless of whether any of such conditions has occurred, the Company may amend
the Exchange Offer in any manner which, in its good faith judgment, is
advantageous to holders of the 1998 Series A Notes.
These conditions are for the sole benefit of the Company and may be waived
by the Company, in whole or in part, in its sole discretion, provided, however,
that in the event that the Company waives any of such conditions that is
material to the Exchange Offer on a date (the "Waiver Date") that is fewer than
five business days prior to the Expiration Date, the Company will extend the
Exchange Offer to five business days from the Waiver Date. Any determination
made by the Company that any of these conditions has occurred will be final and
binding on all holders, absent manifest error.
In addition, the Company will not accept for exchange any 1998 Series A
Notes tendered, and no 1998 Series B Notes will be issued in exchange for any
such 1998 Series A Notes, if at such time any stop order shall be threatened or
in effect with respect to the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus
constitutes a part or the qualification of the Indenture under the Trust
Indenture Act of 1939, as amended.
30
33
EXCHANGE AGENT
U.S. Trust of Texas, N.A., the Trustee under the Indenture, has been
appointed as the Exchange Agent for the Exchange Offer. All executed Letters of
Transmittal, questions and requests for assistance and requests for additional
copies of this Prospectus or of the Letter of Transmittal should be directed to
the Exchange Agent as follows:
If by Registered or Certified Mail: United States Trust Company of Texas,
N.A.
P.O. Box 841
Peter Cooper Station
New York, NY 10276-0841
If by Hand: United States Trust Company of Texas,
N.A.
Corporate Trust Municipal Operations
111 Broadway, Lower Level
New York, NY 10006
If by Overnight Courier: United States Trust Company of Texas,
N.A.
Corporate Trust Municipal Operations
770 Broadway, 13th Floor
New York, NY 10003-9598
If by Facsimile: 212-420-6504
Confirm by Telephone: 1-800-225-2398 Customer Service
DELIVERY TO AN ADDRESS OTHER THAN AS SET FORTH ABOVE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A VALID
DELIVERY.
SOLICITATION OF TENDERS; EXPENSES
The Company has not retained any dealer-manager or similar agent in
connection with the Exchange Offer and will not make any payments to brokers,
dealers or others for soliciting acceptances of the Exchange Offer.
No person has been authorized to give any information or to make any
representations in connection with the Exchange Offer other than those contained
in this Prospectus and the Letter of Transmittal. If given or made, such
information or representations should not be relied upon as having been
authorized by the Company. Neither the delivery of this Prospectus nor any
exchange made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication
that there has been no change in the affairs of the Company since the respective
dates as of which information is given herein. The Exchange Offer is not being
made to (nor will tenders be accepted from or on behalf of) holders of 1998
Series A Notes in any jurisdiction in which the making of the Exchange Offer or
the acceptance thereof would not be in compliance with the laws of such
jurisdiction. The Company may, however, at the reasonable request of any holder,
take such action as it may deem necessary to make the Exchange Offer in any such
jurisdiction and extend the Exchange Offer to holders of 1998 Series A Notes in
such jurisdiction.
TRANSFER TAXES
Holders who tender their 1998 Series A Notes in exchange for 1998 Series B
Notes will not be obligated to pay any transfer taxes in connection therewith,
except that holders who instruct the Company to register 1998 Series B Notes in
the name of, or request that 1998 Series A Notes not tendered or not accepted in
the Exchange Offer be returned to, a person other than the registered tendering
holder will be responsible for the payment of any applicable transfer tax
thereon.
CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO EXCHANGE
Upon consummation of the Exchange Offer, holders of 1998 Series A Notes
that were not prohibited from participating in the Exchange Offer and did not
tender their 1998 Series A Notes will not have any registration rights under the
Registration Agreement with respect to such non-tendered 1998 Series A Notes
and, accordingly such 1998 Series A Notes will continue to be subject to the
restrictions on transfer contained
31
34
in the legend thereon. In general, the 1998 Series A Notes may not be offered or
sold, unless registered under the Securities Act and the applicable state
securities laws, except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not
subject to, the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. The Company
does not intend to register the 1998 Series A Notes under the Securities Act.
Based on interpretations by the staff of the Commission, 1998 Series B Notes
issued pursuant to the Exchange Offer in exchange for 1998 Series A Notes may be
offered for resale, resold or otherwise transferred by holders (other than any
holder which is an "affiliate" of the Company within the meaning of Rule 405
under the Securities Act) without compliance with the registration and
prospectus delivery requirements of Securities Act provided that the 1998 Series
B Notes are acquired in the ordinary course of the holders' business, the
holders have no arrangement with any person to participate in the distribution
of the 1998 Series B Notes and neither the holder nor any other person is
engaging in or intends to engage in a distribution of the 1998 Series B Notes.
If any holder has any arrangement or understanding with respect to the
distribution of the 1998 Series B Notes to be acquired pursuant to the Exchange
Offer, the holder (i) could not rely on the applicable interpretations of the
staff of the SEC and (ii) must comply with the registration and prospectus
delivery requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any resale
transaction. Each broker-dealer that receives 1998 Series B Notes for its own
account in exchange for 1998 Series A Notes, where such 1998 Notes were acquired
by such broker-dealer as a result of market-making activities or other trading
activities, must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection
with any resale of the 1998 Series B Notes. Broker-dealers may not exchange the
1998 Series A Notes which are part of an unsold original allotment in the
Exchange Offer. See "Plan of Distribution." In addition, to comply with the
securities laws of certain jurisdictions, if applicable, the 1998 Series B Notes
may not be offered or sold unless they have been registered or qualified for
sale in such jurisdiction or an exemption from registration or qualification is
available and is complied with. The Company has agreed under the Registration
Agreement to register or qualify the 1998 Series B Notes for resale in any
jurisdictions reasonably requested by any holder, subject to certain
limitations.
OTHER
Participation in the Exchange Offer is voluntary and holders should
carefully consider whether to accept. Holders of the 1998 Series A Notes are
urged to consult their financial and tax advisors in making their own decisions
on what action to take.
Upon consummation of the Exchange Offer, holders of 1998 Series A Notes
that were not prohibited from participating in the Exchange Offer and did not
tender their 1998 Series A Notes will not have any registration rights under the
Registration Agreement with respect to such non-tendered 1998 Series A Notes
and, accordingly, such 1998 Series A Notes will continue to be subject to the
restrictions on transfer contained in the legend thereon.
The Company has not entered into any arrangement or understanding with any
person to distribute the 1998 Series B Notes to be received in the Exchange
Offer and to the best of the Company's information and belief, each person
participating in the Exchange Offer is acquiring the 1998 Series B Notes in its
ordinary course of business and has no arrangement or understanding with any
person to participate in the distribution of the 1998 Series B Notes to be
received in the Exchange Offer. In this regard, the Company will make each
person participating in the Exchange Offer aware (through this Prospectus or
otherwise) that any holder using the Exchange Offer to participate in a
distribution of 1998 Series B Notes to be acquired in the registered Exchange
Offer (i) may not rely on the staff position enunciated in Morgan Stanley and
Co. Inc. (avail. June 5, 1991) and Exxon Capital Holding Corp. (avail. May 13,
1988) or similar letters and (ii) must comply with registration and prospectus
delivery requirements of the Securities Act in connection with a secondary
resale transaction.
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT
The 1998 Series B Notes will be recorded at the same aggregate value as the
1998 Series A Notes, as reflected in the Company's accounting records on the
Exchange Date. Accordingly, no gain or loss for accounting purposes will be
recognized by the Company. The expenses of the Exchange Offer will be amortized
over the term of the 1998 Series B Notes.
32
35
USE OF PROCEEDS
There will be no proceeds to the Company from the Exchange Offer.
The net proceeds of the Offering, after discounts and expenses, were
approximately $194.1 million. Of such amount, approximately $126.3 million was
used to effect the Senior Credit Facility Retirement and approximately $22.0
million was placed in an escrow account to fund the first two interest payments
on the 1998 Notes (see "Description of the 1998 Series B Notes -- Disbursement
of Funds; Escrow Account"). The Company intends to use the remainder of the net
proceeds from the Offering for capital expenditures related to the purchase and
installation of communications equipment and for general corporate purposes,
including working capital related to its expansion into new markets. In
addition, the Company may use a portion of the net proceeds for acquisitions.
Although the Company is evaluating and often engages in discussions regarding
various acquisition opportunities, no agreement or agreement in principal to
effect any material acquisition has been reached. Pending such uses, certain of
the net proceeds of the Offering have been invested in short-term investment
grade securities.
33
36
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth, on an unaudited basis at May 31, 1998, (i)
the capitalization of the Company and (ii) the pro forma capitalization after
giving effect to the Offering and the Senior Credit Facility Retirement. This
table should be read in connection with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations," the Consolidated Financial
Statements of the Company and the notes thereto and the Pro Forma Financial
Information appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus.
AS OF MAY 31, 1998
-----------------------
PRO
ACTUAL FORMA(1)
---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Cash and cash equivalents................................... $ 99,704 $ 145,619
Restricted Investments...................................... 55,294 77,079
--------- ---------
Total..................................................... $ 154,998 $ 222,698
========= =========
Indebtedness:
13% Senior Notes Due 2005................................. $ 219,130 $ 219,130
11 1/2% Senior Notes Due 2008............................. -- 200,000
Notes payable and other long-term liabilities............. 129,503 4,503
Deferred acquisition liabilities.......................... 5,153 5,153
--------- ---------
Subtotal............................................. 353,786 428,786
Stockholders' equity:
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value ("Class A Common
Stock"); 8,000,000 shares authorized; 164,272 issued
and outstanding; 164,272 issued and outstanding pro
forma.................................................. 2 2
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value ("Multi-Vote
Common"); 6,000,000 shares authorized; 2,353,498 issued
and outstanding; 2,353,498 issued and outstanding pro
forma(2)............................................... 24 24
Class C common stock, $0.01 par value ("Non-Voting
Common"); 300,000 shares authorized; 225,000 issued and
outstanding; 225,000 issued and outstanding pro
forma(3)............................................... 2 2
Series A Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000 shares
authorized; 6,962.2 issued and outstanding; 6,962.2
shares issued and outstanding pro forma................ 139,244 139,244
Series B Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000 shares
authorized; 991.1 issued and outstanding; 991.1 shares
issued and outstanding pro forma....................... 59,466 59,466
Additional paid-in capital................................ 113,780 113,780
Accumulated deficit....................................... (129,644) (136,243)
--------- ---------
Subtotal............................................. 182,874 176,275
--------- ---------
Total capitalization.............................. $ 536,660 $ 605,061
========= =========
- ---------------
(1) Gives effect to the Offering and the Senior Credit Facility Retirement as if
such events had occurred on May 31, 1998.
(2) Each share of Multi-Vote Common is convertible into one share of Class A
Common Stock at any time at the option of the holder or automatically upon
the occurrence of a Conversion Event (as defined). The rights of the holders
of the Class A Common Stock and Multi-Vote Common are identical except that
holders of Class A Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each issued and
outstanding share and holders of Multi-Vote Common are entitled to 10 votes
for each issued and outstanding share. See "Description of Capital
Stock -- Common Stock." As used herein, the term "Common Stock" refers
collectively to the Class A Common Stock, Multi-Vote Common and Non-Voting
Common.
(3) Each share of Non-Voting Common will automatically convert into one share of
Class A Common Stock or any other class of common stock of the Issuer that
is registered with the SEC or is listed on a national securities exchange or
authorized for quotation on Nasdaq or otherwise subject to registration
under the Exchange Act, provided the terms thereof are no less favorable to
holders than were the terms of the Non-Voting Common. See "Description of
Capital Stock -- Common Stock." The rights of the holders of the Class A
Common Stock, Multi-Vote Common and the Non-Voting Common are identical
except as to voting rights. Holders of Non-Voting Common are not entitled to
notice of, or to vote at, any meeting of the stockholders or action taken by
written consent, except as required by Delaware law.
34
37
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
The following selected historical consolidated financial data for the year
ended December 31, 1994, the eight month period ended August 31, 1995 and as of
and for the years ended August 31, 1996 and 1997 have been derived from the
consolidated financial statements of the Company included elsewhere herein and
audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors as set forth in their
report thereon also included herein. The selected financial data of the Company
as of and for the period ended December 31, 1993 and as of December 31, 1994 and
August 31, 1995 is derived from the Company's audited financial statements not
included herein. The selected financial data presented below as of and for the
nine month periods ended May 31, 1997 and 1998 have been derived from unaudited
consolidated financial statements of the Company. In the opinion of management,
the unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same
basis as the audited financial statements and include all adjustments, which
consist only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair
presentation of the Company's financial position and results of operation for
these periods. In 1995, the Company changed its fiscal year end to August 31 to
match that of its majority stockholder. As a result of the change in fiscal year
and the Company's history of growth through acquisitions the Company's
historical financial results are not directly comparable from period to period,
nor are they indicative of future results of operations in many respects. The
following information should be read in conjunction with "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,"
"Business" and the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the
notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus.
PERIOD FROM
APRIL 20, 1993 EIGHT MONTH
(DATE OF INCEPTION) YEAR ENDED PERIOD ENDED
TO DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, AUGUST 31,
1993 1994 1995
------------------- ------------ ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS DATA
Revenues:
Cable television........... $ 12 $ 240 $ 8,783
Telecommunications......... -- 202 788
----- ------- --------
Total revenues............. 12 442 9,571
Operating expenses:
Programming, access fees
and revenue sharing..... 6 470 4,558
Customer support, general
and administrative...... 304 7,733 12,055
Depreciation and
amortization............ 8 117 2,420
----- ------- --------
Total operating expenses..... 318 8,320 19,033
----- ------- --------
Loss from operations......... (306) (7,878) (9,462)
Interest expense, net(1)..... (1) (66) (1,169)
----- ------- --------
Loss before income taxes..... (307) (7,944) (10,631)
Net loss(2).................. $(307) $(7,944) $(10,161)
===== ======= ========
Basic and diluted loss per
share of Common Stock(3)... N/A N/A $ (6.89)
NINE MONTHS
YEAR ENDED ENDED
AUGUST 31, MAY 31,
----------------------- ---------------------------
1996 1997 1997 1998
---------- ---------- ------------ ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS DATA
Revenues:
Cable television........... $ 25,893 $ 36,915 $ 26,915 $ 42,195
Telecommunications......... 1,711 2,922 2,202 2,721
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total revenues............. 27,604 39,837 29,117 44,916
Operating expenses:
Programming, access fees
and revenue sharing..... 11,868 19,202 14,016 20,213
Customer support, general
and administrative...... 19,636 28,926 19,842 25,044
Depreciation and
amortization............ 8,676 14,505 9,934 18,432
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total operating expenses..... 40,180 62,633 43,792 63,689
-------- -------- -------- --------
Loss from operations......... (12,576) (22,796) (14,675) (18,773)
Interest expense, net(1)..... (5,854) (25,739) (16,993) (29,459)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Loss before income taxes..... (18,430) (48,535) (31,668) (48,232)
Net loss(2).................. $(18,430) $(48,535) $(31,668) $(48,232)
======== ======== ======== ========
Basic and diluted loss per
share of Common Stock(3)... $ (8.30) $ (19.98) $ (13.28) $ (20.04)
DECEMBER 31, AUGUST 31,
-------------- ------------------------------ MAY 31,
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
---- ------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
BALANCE SHEET DATA
Cash and cash equivalents........................ $ 41 $ 5,019 $ 2,036 $ 1,677 $ 87,305 $ 99,704
Restricted investments........................... -- -- -- -- 67,206 55,294
Property, plant and equipment, net............... 509 11,379 48,060 103,800 160,442 251,324
Intangible assets................................ -- 16,189 55,443 65,876 82,583 160,255
Total assets..................................... 588 33,820 108,072 175,978 403,416 576,098
Convertible notes due stockholder................ -- 15,000 17,950 89,414 129,604 --
Total liabilities................................ 206 31,007 39,527 116,700 383,051 393,224
Stockholders' equity............................. 382 2,813 68,545 59,279 20,365 182,874
35
38
PERIOD FROM
APRIL 20, 1993 NINE MONTHS
(DATE OF EIGHT MONTH YEAR ENDED ENDED
INCEPTION) YEAR ENDED PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, MAY 31,
TO DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, AUGUST 31, ----------------------- ---------------------
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1997 1998
--------------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ---------- --------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA
Net cash flows used in
operating activities........ $(183) $ (3,332) $ (3,494) $ (453) $ (15,935) $ (2,623) $ (15,151)
Net cash flows used in
investing activities........ (517) (10,576) (72,144) (72,037) (143,125) (129,127) (88,675)
Net cash flows provided by
financing activities........ 741 18,886 72,655 72,131 244,688 243,570 116,225
Capital expenditures(4)....... 517 9,278 22,170 62,121 71,505 44,470 62,015
EBITDA(5)..................... (298) (7,761) (7,042) (3,900) (8,291) (4,741) (341)
Deficiency of earnings to
fixed charges(6)............ 307 7,944 10,630 20,280 50,791 33,182 50,383
AS OF
------------------------------------------
AUGUST 31,
------------------------------- MAY 31,
1995 1996 1997 1998
------- ------- ------- -------
OPERATING DATA(7)
CABLE TELEVISION
Units under contract(8)..................................... 173,324 241,496 295,149 431,384
Units passed(9)............................................. 170,336 225,433 254,032 397,281
Basic subscribers........................................... 75,944 114,163 132,556 217,106
Basic penetration(10)....................................... 44.6% 50.6% 52.2% 54.6%
Premium units(11)........................................... 39,753 60,641 95,150 175,478
Pay-to-basic ratio(11)(12).................................. 52.3% 53.1% 71.8% 86.7%
Average monthly revenue per basic subscriber(13)............ $ 22.84 $ 22.70 $ 24.94 $ 27.71
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Units under contract(8)..................................... 10,322 20,945 39,831 89,911
Units passed(9)............................................. 9,116 12,364 16,572 33,131
Lines(14)................................................... 2,650 4,126 6,185 7,700
Line penetration(15)........................................ 29.1% 33.4% 37.3% 26.6%
Average monthly revenue per line(16)........................ $ 36.86 $ 42.10 $ 47.23 $ 50.63
- ---------------
(1) Interest expense, net is reflected net of interest income and interest
capitalized in property, plant and equipment. Includes interest expense on
the GVL Notes of approximately $919,000, $5,342,000, $15,204,000,
$10,671,000 and $9,640,000 for the eight month period ended August 31,
1995, the years ended August 31, 1996 and 1997 and the nine months ended
May 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively.
(2) The Company had no taxable income for the periods reported. The Company
reported an income tax benefit of approximately $470,000 in the eight month
period ended August 31, 1995.
(3) Loss per share is not presented for the periods the Company was organized
as a partnership. Loss per share has been restated to reflect the adoption
of statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per
Share." Basic and diluted loss per share are computed in the same manner
since common stock equivalents have an antidilutive effect.
(4) Capital expenditures include expenditures on property, plant and equipment
together with intangible assets excluding expenditures for business
acquisitions.
(5) EBITDA represents earnings before interest expense (net of interest income
and amounts capitalized), income tax benefits, depreciation and
amortization. EBITDA is not intended to represent cash flow from operations
or an alternative to net loss, each as defined by generally accepted
accounting principles. In addition, the measure of EBITDA presented herein
may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures by other
companies. The Company believes that EBITDA is a standard measure commonly
reported and widely used by analysts, investors and other interested
parties in the cable television and telecommunications industries.
Accordingly, this information has been disclosed herein to permit a more
complete comparative analysis of the Company's operating performance
relative to other companies in its industry.
(6) For the purposes of calculating the deficiency of earnings to fixed
charges, (i) earnings consist of loss before income taxes plus fixed
charges and (ii) fixed charges consist of interest expense on all debt,
amortization of deferred financing costs and the portion of operating lease
rental expense that is representative of the interest factor (deemed to be
one third of minimum operating lease rental).
36
39
(7) Operating data for 1993 and 1994 is not available because such information
was not tracked prior to the acquisition of the Company by VPC. The Company
does not believe that the operating statistics for 1993 and 1994, if they
were available, would be material because the Company's revenues during
such periods were minimal.
(8) Units under contract represents the number of units currently passed and
additional units with respect to which the Company has entered into Rights
of Entry for the provision of cable television and telecommunications
services, respectively, but which the Company has not yet passed and which
the Company expects to pass within the next five years. At this time
substantially all units under contract for telecommunications are also
under contract for cable television.
(9) Units passed represents the number of units with respect to which the
Company has connected its cable television and telecommunications systems,
respectively. The difference between units under contract and units passed
represents units for which Rights of Entry have been entered into, but
which are not yet connected for cable television and telecommunications
services, respectively.
(10) Basic penetration is calculated by dividing the total number of basic
subscribers at such date by the total number of units passed.
(11) Beginning with the year ended August 31, 1997, to be consistent with most
other cable television providers, the Company has revised the method of
reporting premium penetration to include all premium units in the
calculation. Historically the calculation excluded premium channels that
were provided to customers as part of an expanded basic line up or other
special arrangements. Prior years have not been restated. For comparative
purposes, the premium units and the pay-to-basic ratios as of August 31,
1997 and May 31, 1998, presented under the previous method of reporting are
84,875 and 129,553, respectively, and 64.0% and 64.0%, respectively.
(12) Pay-to-basic ratio is calculated by dividing the total number of premium
units by the total number of basic subscribers.
(13) Represents average monthly revenue per the average number of basic
subscribers for the fiscal periods ended as of the date shown.
(14) Lines represent the number of telephone lines currently being provided to
telecommunications subscribers. A telecommunications subscriber can
subscribe for more than one line. The Company has revised its method of
reporting lines to reflect only one line in service where multiple
customers share a single line. The Company has restated the number of lines
previously reported to reflect this change.
(15) Line penetration is calculated by dividing the total number of
telecommunications lines at such date by the total number of units passed.
(16) Represents average monthly revenue per the average number of lines for the
fiscal period ended as of the date shown.
37
40
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this
Prospectus.
OVERVIEW
OpTel is a leading network based provider of integrated communications
services, including local and long distance telephone and cable television
services, to residents of MDUs in the United States. The Company was organized
in April 1993 to build, acquire and operate private cable television and
telecommunications systems. The Company seeks to capitalize on opportunities
created by the Telecom Act to become the principal competitor in the MDU market
to the ILEC and the incumbent franchise cable television operator. The Company
has commenced offering central office switched telecommunications services in
Houston and Dallas-Fort Worth and expects to offer such services in
substantially all of its major markets by the end of calendar 1999.
Since inception, the Company has experienced substantial growth. This
growth has been achieved through a combination of acquisitions of other
operators, many of which operated SMATV systems, and the negotiation of new
Rights of Entry. In general, the conduct of the acquired operations prior to
acquisition was materially different from the conduct of operations following
acquisition. Among the changes made in many of the businesses after acquisition
were (i) commencing conversion of SMATV systems to 18GHz or fiber optic
networks, (ii) delivering customer service from a more advanced national call
center in Dallas, (iii) increasing the number of programming channels, (iv)
improving technical and field service and system reliability, (v) improving
regulatory and financial controls and (vi) initiating telecommunications
services offerings.
On April 13, 1998, OpTel completed the acquisition of the ICS Operations,
subject to the consummation of certain transfer conditions. As of May 31, 1998,
OpTel had received consents and accepted transfer of legal title to
approximately 66,000 of the ICS cable television and telecommunications units
under contract (or approximately 72% of the approximately 90,000 ICS units under
contract to be acquired). While the Company expects the transfer of the
remaining units to be completed over the next few months, the transfer of these
units is subject to certain conditions, including the receipt of third party
consents, and there can be no assurance that the transfer of all or part of the
balance will be completed. See "Risk Factors -- Risks Associated with
Acquisitions." As of May 31, 1998, the Company had 369,968 and 28,971 units
passed for cable television and telecommunications, respectively. As of such
date, OpTel had 202,355 cable television subscribers and 7,046 telecommunication
lines in service.
OpTel believes that by utilizing a single advanced network infrastructure
it can be the first to market a competitive integrated package of voice and
video services in its serviced markets. As of March 31 and May 31, 1998,
respectively, the Company's networks delivered cable television services to
approximately 229,935 and 249,549 units representing approximately 72% and 63%
of the Company's units passed for cable television. The decrease in the
percentage of units passed served by the Company's networks is a direct result
of the acquisition of the ICS Operations on April 13, 1998. OpTel expects to
connect substantially all of the MDUs currently served by SMATV systems to 18GHz
or fiber optic networks by the end of calendar 2000. Once an MDU is brought onto
the Company's networks, gross profit per subscriber at the MDU generally
increases. In addition, networks provide OpTel with the infrastructure necessary
to deliver an integrated package of communications services to subscribers at
the MDU.
The Company's telecommunications revenue is comprised of monthly recurring
charges, usage charges and initial non-recurring charges. Monthly recurring
charges include fees paid by subscribers for line rental and additional
features. Usage charges consist of fees paid by end users for long distance,
fees paid by the ILEC for terminating intraLATA traffic to the Company's network
and access charges paid by carriers for long distance traffic originated and
terminated to and from local customers. Initial non-recurring charges include
fees paid by subscribers for installation.
38
41
The Company's cable television revenue is comprised of monthly recurring
charges paid by subscribers, monthly recurring charges paid by MDU owners for
bulk services and fees paid by subscribers for premium services and some
non-recurring charges. The Company offers its cable services under either retail
or bulk agreements. Under retail agreements, the Company contracts directly with
MDU residents. Under bulk agreements, the Company contracts directly with MDU
owners for basic cable to be provided to all units in a particular MDU, but
generally at lower prices than under retail agreements. This lower per unit rate
is generally offset by the 100% penetration achieved by bulk agreements. Premium
services are contracted for directly by subscribers under both types of
agreements and include fees paid for premium channels and pay-per-view. The
Company anticipates that its overall revenue per subscriber will increase as the
number of bulk contracts declines as a percentage of the Company's Rights of
Entry. Additionally, the Company believes that its revenue per subscriber will
increase as it migrates its SMATV properties onto the Company's networks. See
"Business -- Network Architecture."
The line item programming, access fees and revenue sharing with respect to
the Company's telecommunications services consists of leased transport
facilities, terminating access charges from ILECs, fees paid to IXCs for long
distance and revenue sharing. Leased transport facility costs may include the
rental of T-1's to connect the MDUs to the ILEC and may include costs associated
with connecting the Company's Network Hubs to each other and to its central
office switch. Terminating access charges are fees paid to the ILEC for
intraLATA calls which are originated by OpTel's subscribers and terminated on
the ILECs network. Fees paid to IXCs for long distance include costs associated
with terminating toll calls initiated by OpTel's subscribers. Revenue sharing
costs include a commission type payment to owners of MDUs for marketing the
Company's telephone product.
The line item programming, access fees and revenue sharing with respect to
the Company's cable television services consists of programming costs, franchise
fees and revenue sharing. Programming costs include those fees paid to obtain
the rights to broadcast certain video programming. Revenue sharing costs include
a commission type payment to owners of MDUs.
The Company's customer support, general and administrative expenses include
selling and marketing costs, customer service, engineering, facilities and
corporate and regional administration.
Through May 31, 1998, the Company had invested approximately $444 million
primarily in its cable television and telecommunications assets. The Company's
revenues have grown from $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 1994 to
$39.8 million for fiscal 1997. While pursuing its investment and development
strategy, the Company has incurred substantial up-front operating expenses for
marketing, customer operations, administration and maintenance of facilities,
general and administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization in order
to solicit and service customers in advance of generating significant revenues.
As a result of these factors, the Company has generated operating losses of $6.6
million, $22.8 million, $12.6 million, and $9.5 million for the quarter ended
May 31, 1998, fiscal 1997, fiscal 1996 and the eight months ended August 31,
1995, respectively, as its cable television and telecommunications customer base
has grown. The Company reported positive EBITDA (as defined in the Glossary) of
$1.0 million for the quarter ended May 31, 1998 as compared with negative EBITDA
of $2.3 million, $8.3 million, $3.9 million and $7.0 million for the nine months
ended May 31, 1998 and for fiscal 1997, fiscal 1996 and the eight months ended
August 31, 1995, respectively. The Company expects that the incremental
operating costs associated with the addition of new customers in its existing
markets will be principally limited to customer operations and marketing
expenses and, therefore, that its EBITDA will improve significantly. There can
be no assurance that the Company will generate operating profits or continue to
generate positive EBITDA in the future.
FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE OPERATIONS
The principal operating factors affecting the Company's future results of
operations are expected to include (i) changes in the number of MDUs under
Rights of Entry, (ii) penetration rates for its services, (iii) the terms of its
arrangements with MDU owners, including revenue sharing and length of contract,
(iv) the prices that it charges its subscribers, (v) normal operating expenses,
which in the cable television business principally consist of programming
expenses and in the telecommunications business principally
39
42
consist of fees paid to long distance carriers, the cost of trunking services
and other LEC charges, as well as, in each case, billing and collection costs,
technical service and maintenance expenses and customer support services, and
(vi) capital expenditures as the Company commences offering central office
switched telecommunication services in additional markets and completes its
conversion of SMATV systems. The Company's results of operations may also be
impacted by future acquisitions.
The Company anticipates that it will continue to have higher churn than is
typical of an incumbent franchise cable television operator due to the frequent
turnover of MDU tenants. This churn generally does not result in a reduction in
overall penetration rates since the outgoing subscriber is generally quickly
replaced by a new tenant in the unit. This may result in average installation
revenue per subscriber that is higher than for a franchise cable television
operator. Although this may also require higher installation expenses per
subscriber, because of the layout of MDUs and the Company's ability to obtain
"permission to enter" from the MDU owner, installations can often be completed
when the subscriber is not home, limiting the expense of installation.
Accordingly, the Company does not believe that churn is as significant an
operating statistic as would be the case for franchise cable television
operators. With respect to the Company's telecommunications services, the
Company believes that its best opportunity for a sale arises when a subscriber
first signs a lease and takes occupancy in an MDU. Accordingly, the Company
believes that during the early stages of the roll out its central office
switched telecommunications services in a market it benefits from the high rate
of MDU resident turnover.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In 1995, the Company changed its fiscal year end to August 31 to match that
of its majority stockholder. In addition, all of the Company's acquisitions have
been accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. As a result of the
Company's growth through acquisitions and the change in fiscal year, the
Company's historical financial results are not directly comparable from period
to period, nor are they indicative of future results of operations in many
respects.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain
operating and financial information relating to the Company.
AS OF AS OF
AUGUST 31, MAY 31,
--------------------------- -----------------
1995 1996 1997 1997 1998
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
OPERATING DATA
CABLE TELEVISION
Units passed(1).............................. 170,336 225,433 254,032 252,481 369,968
Basic subscribers............................ 75,944 114,163 132,556 134,147 202,355
Basic penetration(2)......................... 44.6% 50.6% 52.2% 53.1% 54.7%
Average monthly revenue per basic
subscriber(3).............................. $ 22.84 $ 22.70 $ 24.94 $ 25.00 $ 27.74
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Units passed(1).............................. 9,116 12,364 16,572 15,248 28,971
Lines(4)..................................... 2,650 4,126 6,185 5,402 7,046
Line penetration(5).......................... 29.1% 33.4% 37.3% 35.4% 24.3%
Average monthly revenue per line(6).......... $ 36.86 $ 42.10 $ 47.23 $ 50.00 $ 50.63
40
43
EIGHT MONTH YEAR ENDED NINE MONTH PERIOD
PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, ENDED MAY 31,
AUGUST 31, -------------------- --------------------
1995 1996 1997 1997 1998
------------ -------- --------- --------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
FINANCIAL DATA
Revenues:
Cable television....................... $ 8,783 $ 25,893 $ 36,915 $ 26,915 $ 42,195
Telecommunications..................... 788 1,711 2,922 2,202 2,721
-------- -------- --------- --------- --------
Total revenues................. $ 9,571 $ 27,604 $ 39,837 $ 29,117 $ 44,916
EBITDA(7)................................ $ (7,042) $ (3,900) $ (8,291) $ (4,714) $ (341)
Net cash flows used in operating
activities............................. $ (3,494) $ (453) $ (15,935) $ (2,623) $(15,151)
Net cash flows used in investing
activities............................. (72,144) (72,037) (143,125) (129,127) (88,675)
Net cash flows provided by financing
activities............................. 72,655 72,131 244,688 243,570 116,225
- ---------------
(1) Units passed represents the number of units with respect to which the
Company has connected its cable television and telecommunications systems,
respectively.
(2) Basic penetration is calculated by dividing the total number of basic
subscribers at such date by the total number of units passed.
(3) Represents average monthly revenue per the average number of basic
subscribers for the fiscal periods ended as of the date shown.
(4) Lines represent the number of telephone lines currently being provided to
telecommunications subscribers. A telecommunications subscriber can
subscribe for more than one line. The Company has revised its method of
reporting lines to reflect only one line in service where multiple customers
share a single line. The Company has restated the number of lines previously
reported to reflect this change.
(5) Line penetration is calculated by dividing the total number of
telecommunications lines at such date by the total number of units passed.
(6) Represents average monthly revenue per the average number of lines for the
fiscal period ended as of the date shown.
(7) EBITDA represents income (loss) from operations before interest (net of
interest income and amounts capitalized), income taxes and depreciation and
amortization. EBITDA is not intended to represent cash flow from operations
or an alternative to net loss, each as defined by generally accepted
accounting principles. In addition, the measure of EBITDA presented herein
may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures by other companies.
The Company believes that EBITDA is a standard measure commonly reported and
widely used by analysts, investors and other interested parties in the cable
television and telecommunications industries. Accordingly, this information
has been disclosed herein to permit a more complete comparative analysis of
the Company's operating performance relative to other companies in its
industry.
Nine months ended May 31, 1998 compared with nine months ended May 31, 1997
Total Revenues. Total revenues for the nine months ended May 31, 1998
increased by $15.8 million or 54.3% to $44.9 million compared to revenues of
$29.1 million for the nine months ended May 31, 1997.
Cable Television. Cable television revenues for the nine months ended May
31, 1998 increased by $15.3 million, or 56.8%, to $42.2 million from $26.9
million in the comparable period of fiscal 1997, reflecting a 61.8% increase in
the number of customers and an 11.0% increase in the average monthly revenue per
customer. These increases resulted from a combination of rate increases, a
change in the mix of customers from bulk to retail, a shift in mix to the cities
with higher revenues per customer and increased premium revenues as the
Company's pay-to-basic ratio improved from 69.9% to 86.7%. The Company also
continued to grow basic penetration, which increased by 1.5% compared to the
third quarter of fiscal 1997.
Telecommunications. Telecommunications revenues for the nine months ended
May 31, 1998 increased by 23.6% to $2.7 million from $2.2 million in the
comparable period of fiscal 1997, reflecting a 42.5% increase in the number of
lines. In Houston, the Company is in the final stages of converting properties
previously served by PBX switches to the Company's central office switch. In
addition, the Company recently launched its central office switch in Dallas-Fort
Worth. The Company is also reviewing a series of alternatives for rapid switch
deployment in other markets.
41
44
Programming, Access Fees and Revenue Sharing. Programming, access fees and
revenue sharing increased by 44.2% to $20.2 million from $14.0 million because
of an increase in subscribers primarily due to the acquisitions of Phonoscope
and the ICS Operations.
Customer Support, General and Administrative. Customer support, general and
administrative expenses were $25.0 million for the nine months ended May 31,
1998 compared to $19.8 million for the comparable period of fiscal 1997. As a
percent of revenues, customer support, general and administrative expenses
declined from 68.1% to 55.8%. The increase in overall customer support, general
and administrative expenses was in line with the Company's budget and largely
due to an increase in personnel associated with the expansion of the Company's
operations and the planned roll out of the Company's telecommunications
services.
EBITDA. The Company's EBITDA for the nine months ended May 31, 1998 were
negative $0.3 million, compared to negative $4.7 million in the comparable
period of fiscal 1997. The Company's net cash flows used in operating activities
were $15.2 million, compared to $2.6 million in the preceding fiscal year. The
Company's net cash flows used in investing activities were $176.2 million,
compared to $129.1 million in the preceding fiscal year. The Company's net cash
flows provided by financing activities were $116.2 million, compared to $243.6
million in the preceding fiscal year.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization was $18.4
million for the third quarter of fiscal 1998 compared to $9.9 million in the
third quarter of fiscal 1997. The increase is primarily attributable to an
increase in cable and telephone systems and intangible assets resulting from
continued purchases and construction of such systems and from acquisitions of
businesses.
Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense (net of amounts capitalized) was
$35.9 million for the first nine months of fiscal 1998, an increase of $18.9
million over net interest expense of $17.0 million for the first nine months of
fiscal 1997, reflecting the increase in the Company's debt incurred principally
to fund the build out of its network. See "-- Liquidity and Capital Resources."
Interest income and other income. Interest income and other income was $6.5
million for the nine month period ended May 31, 1998, an increase of $6.5
million over nominal interest income and other income from the comparable period
for fiscal 1997. The increase in interest income and other income was largely
due to an increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted investments
resulting from the proceeds of the offering of the 1997 Notes in February 1997.
Fiscal year ended August 31, 1997 compared to fiscal year ended August 31,
1996
Total revenues. Total revenues for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1997
increased by $12.2 million or 44% to $39.8 million compared to revenues of $27.6
million for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1996.
Cable television. Compared to fiscal 1996, cable television revenues
increased by $11.0 million, or 42%, to $36.9 million from $25.9 million,
reflecting both a 16% increase in the number of subscribers and a 10% increase
in the average monthly revenue per basic subscriber which rose from $22.70 for
fiscal 1996 to $24.90 for fiscal 1997. The increase in revenue per subscriber
resulted from a combination of rate increases following property upgrades,
annual rate increases and increased premium revenues as the Company's pay to
basic ratio improved from 53% to 72% over the course of the year. The Company
continued to grow basic penetration which increased by 1.6% over the year.
Telecommunications. The Company's strategy is to roll out central office
switched local exchange services in each of the major markets in which it
operates. Until recently the Company served certain properties as an STS
provider, reselling telephone service using PBXs situated at the MDU properties.
The Company has not historically promoted such STS service because it was not in
line with its strategy to offer central office switched telecommunications
services to its subscribers. Despite not promoting telecommunications services
during the year, telecommunications contributed $2.9 million of revenue compared
to $1.7 million in the preceding year, mainly as a result of increased
penetration and a 34% increase in the number of units where telephone service is
offered from 12,364 at the end of fiscal 1996 to 16,572 at the end of fiscal
1997.
42
45
Programming, Access Fees and Revenue Sharing. Programming, access fees and
revenue sharing was $19.2 million for fiscal 1997 compared to $11.9 million for
fiscal 1996. Such costs are generally variable based on the number of
subscribers or gross revenues. Overall, programming, access fees and revenue
sharing as a percentage of total revenues increased over the year from 43.0% to
48.2%, largely due to costs associated with the increase in the number of
subscribers served by PBX telephone service, the increase in premium cable
penetration which has lower associated margins and, to a lesser extent, an
increase in the proportion of the Company's portfolio under revenue sharing
arrangements with property owners. The PBX costs represent the costs of
interconnecting individual properties with the ILEC's central office switch.
These costs will be substantially reduced once the Company is able to utilize
its own networks to pass telephone traffic to Company owned central office
switches.
Customer Support, General and Administrative. Customer support, general and
administrative expenses were $28.9 million for fiscal 1997 compared to $19.6
million for fiscal 1996. The increase in expenses was largely due to an increase
in personnel associated with the expansion of the Company's operations and
recruitment for the roll out of the Company's telecommunications services in
advance of the expected revenues. In addition, the Company incurred a one time
reorganization charge of $1.4 million associated with the restructuring of
certain senior management positions during the year which was included in such
expenses.
EBITDA. The Company's EBITDA decreased from negative $3.9 million to
negative $8.3 million over the year, largely due to the reduced gross margins
and the expansion of the Company's operations in anticipation of the roll out of
telecommunications services. The increase in negative EBITDA was largely within
expectations given that the Company increased its personnel in the middle of
fiscal 1997 in anticipation of two significant events that occurred after the
end of the fiscal year: the launch of the Houston central office switch and the
consummation of the acquisition of the residential cable television and
associated fiber optic network assets of Phonoscope.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization was $14.5
million for fiscal 1997 compared to $8.7 million in fiscal 1996. This increase
is primarily attributable to an increase in cable and telephone systems and
intangible assets resulting from continued purchases and construction of such
systems and from acquisitions of businesses.
Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense (net of amounts capitalized) was
$31.4 million for fiscal 1997, an increase of $25.4 million over interest
expense of $6.0 million for fiscal 1996, reflecting the increase in the
Company's debt incurred principally to fund the build out of its network.
Interest income and other income. Interest income and other income was $5.7
million for fiscal 1997, an increase of $5.6 million over interest income and
other income of $0.1 million for fiscal 1996. The increase in interest income
and other income was largely due to an increase in cash and cash equivalents and
restricted investments resulting from the proceeds of the offering of the 1997
Notes in February 1997.
Income tax benefit. The Company has experienced net operating losses for
the years ended August 31, 1997 and 1996. Realization of deferred tax assets is
dependent on generating sufficient taxable income prior to expiration of the
loss carryforwards. The Company is unable to determine whether these accumulated
losses will be utilized; accordingly, a valuation allowance has been provided
and no benefit has been recognized.
Fiscal year ended August 31, 1996 compared with eight months ended August 31,
1995
Total revenues. Revenues were $27.6 million for fiscal 1996, an increase of
188% over revenues of $9.6 million for the eight months ended August 31, 1995.
Of the revenues generated in fiscal 1996, 93.8% and 6.2% represented revenues
from cable television and telecommunications, respectively, compared to 91.8%
and 8.2%, respectively, for the eight months ended August 31, 1995.
Cable television. Cable television revenues were $25.9 million for fiscal
1996, an increase of 194% over cable television revenues of $8.8 million for the
eight months ended August 31, 1995. The growth was attributable in part to an
increase in the average number of cable television subscribers, which accounted
for approximately $15.6 million of the increase. Cable television revenues also
grew in part from an increase in the
43
46
retail price of the Company's cable television services which accounted for
approximately $1.5 million of the increase.
Telecommunications. Telecommunications revenues were $1.7 million for
fiscal 1996, an increase of 113% over the eight months ended August 31, 1995.
This growth was largely due to an increase in the average number of
telecommunications lines.
Programming, Access Fees and Revenue Sharing. Programming, access fees and
revenue sharing was $11.9 million for fiscal 1996, an increase of 159%, from
$4.6 million for the eight months ended August 31, 1995. The increases in costs
were primarily attributable to the growth in the number of cable television
subscribers and telecommunications lines.
Customer Support, General and Administrative. Customer support, general and
administrative expenses increased to $19.6 million from $12.1 million, or 111%,
over the eight months ended August 31, 1995. The increase was largely due to an
increase in personnel associated with the expansion of the Company's operations
and the rapid growth in the size of the cable television and telecommunications
networks and the number of subscribers.
Included in the above amounts are costs of $2.3 million for fiscal 1996 and
$3.8 million for the eight months ended August 31, 1995, relating to
assimilating acquisitions made by the Company and including severance,
relocation and recruitment costs.
EBITDA. Negative EBITDA increased to $3.9 million for fiscal 1996. The
improvement in negative EBITDA represents an increase of $3.1 million over
negative EBITDA of $7.0 million for eight months ended August 31, 1995. Negative
EBITDA represented 14.1% of total revenues for fiscal 1996 compared to 73.6% of
total revenues for the eight months ended August 31, 1995.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization was $8.7
million for fiscal 1996 compared to $2.4 million for the eight months ended
August 31, 1995. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in cable
and telephone systems and intangible assets resulting from continued purchases
and construction of such systems and from acquisitions of businesses.
Interest expense, Net. Interest expense (net of amounts capitalized) was
$6.0 million for year ended August 31, 1996, an increase of $4.7 million over
interest expense of $1.3 million for eight months ended August 31, 1995,
reflecting the increase in the Company's debt incurred principally to fund the
build out of its network.
Income tax benefit. The Company has experienced net operating losses for
the year ended August 31, 1996 and the eight months ended August 31, 1995.
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on generating sufficient taxable
income prior to expiration of the loss carryforwards. The Company is unable to
determine whether these accumulated losses will be utilized; accordingly, a
valuation allowance has been provided and no benefit has been recognized.
Eight months ended August 31, 1995 compared with the year ended December 31,
1994
Total revenues. Revenues were $9.6 million for the eight months ended
August 31, 1995, an increase of $9.2 million over revenues of $0.4 million for
the year ended December 31, 1994. Of the revenues generated in the eight months
ended August 31, 1995, 91.8% and 8.2% represented revenues from cable television
and telecommunications, respectively, compared to 54.3% and 45.7% respectively,
for the year ended December 31, 1994.
44
47
Cable television. Cable television growth was primarily attributable to an
increase in the average number of cable television subscribers.
Telecommunications. Telecommunications revenue growth was primarily due to
an increase in the average number of telecommunications subscribers.
Programming, Access Fees and Revenue Sharing. Programming, access fees and
revenue sharing was $4.6 million for the eight months ended August 31, 1995, an
increase of $4.1 million from $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 1994.
The increase was primarily attributable to the growth in the number of cable
television subscribers and telecommunications lines.
Customer Support, General and Administrative. Customer support, general and
administrative expenses were $8.3 million for the eight months ended August 31,
1995, an increase of 6.5% over the year ended December 31, 1994. The increase
was largely due to an increase in personnel associated with the expansion of the
Company's operations generated primarily by the acquisition of private cable
companies in five markets and the rapid growth in the size of the Company's
cable television and telecommunications networks and in the number of
subscribers.
The Company incurred reorganization costs of $3.8 million for the eight
month period ended August 31, 1995, related to the costs of assimilating the
acquisitions made by the Company and include severance, relocation and
recruitment costs.
EBITDA. Negative EBITDA increased to $7.0 million for the eight months
ended August 31, 1995. The increase in negative EBITDA represents an increase of
$0.8 million from negative EBITDA of $7.8 million for the year ended December
31, 1994. Negative EBITDA represented 73.6% of total revenues for the eight
months ended August 31, 1995.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization was $2.4
million for eight months ended August 31, 1995 compared to $0.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 1994. The increase is primarily attributable to an
increase in cable and telephone systems and intangible assets resulting from
continued purchases and construction of such systems and from acquisitions of
businesses.
Interest expense. Interest expense was $1.3 million for eight months ended
August 31, 1995, an increase of $1.2 million over interest expense for year
ended December 31, 1994, reflecting the increase in the Company's debt incurred
principally to fund the build out of its network.
Income tax benefit. The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $0.5
million for the eight months ended August 31, 1995 which was the result of the
reduction of a deferred tax liability no longer required due to increased tax
losses being available. No income tax expense was recorded for the year ended
December 31, 1994.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The development of OpTel's business and the expansion of its network have
required substantial capital, operational and administrative expenditures, a
significant portion of which have been incurred before the realization of
revenues. These expenditures will continue to result in negative cash flow until
an adequate customer base is established and revenues are realized. Although its
revenues have increased in each of the last three years, OpTel has incurred
substantial up-front operating expenses for marketing, customer operations,
administration and maintenance of facilities, general and administrative
expenses and depreciation and amortization in order to solicit and service
customers in advance of generating significant revenues. As a result of these
factors, the Company has generated operating losses of $18.8 million, $22.8
million, $12.6 million, $9.5 million and $7.9 million for the nine months ended
May 31, 1998, fiscal 1997, fiscal 1996, the eight months ended August 31, 1995
and the year ended December 31, 1994, respectively, as its cable television and
telecommunications customer base has grown. The Company reported net losses of
$48.2 million for the nine months ended May 31, 1998 as compared with net losses
of $48.5 million, $18.4 million, $10.2 million and $7.9 million for fiscal 1997,
fiscal 1996, the eight months ended August 31, 1995 and the year ended December
31, 1994, respectively.
45
48
During the past year, the Company has required external funds to finance
capital expenditures associated with the completion of acquisitions in strategic
markets, expansion of its networks and operating activities. Net cash used in
building the Company's cable television and telecommunications networks and
related business activities was $103.3 million for the first nine months of
fiscal 1998 (including $36.5 million for the acquisition of Phonoscope) compared
to $49.5 million for the first nine months of fiscal 1997.
From inception and until the issuance of the 1997 Notes, the Company relied
primarily on investments from GVL, its principal stockholder, in the form of
equity and convertible notes to fund its operations. Effective March 1, 1998,
GVL converted all of the outstanding GVL Notes, including accrued interest, into
shares of Series A Preferred with an aggregate liquidation preference of
approximately $139.2 million. The Series A Preferred earns dividends at the
annual rate of 9.75%, initially payable in additional shares, and is convertible
under certain circumstances and at certain prices at the option of the holder
into shares of Multi-Vote Common. See "Description of Capital Stock -- Preferred
Stock." None of the Company's stockholders or affiliates is under any
contractual obligation to provide additional financing to the Company.
In February 1997, the Company issued the 1997 Notes along with 225,000
shares of Non-Voting Common for aggregate net proceeds of $219.2 million. Of
this amount, approximately $79.8 million was placed in an escrow account in
order to cover the first six semi-annual interest payments due on the 1997
Notes. At May 31, 1998, approximately $54.5 million remained in such escrow
account. See "Description of Other Indebtedness -- The 1997 Notes."
In December 1997, the Company obtained the Senior Credit Facility which
consisted of a $125 million term loan bearing interest at LIBOR plus 3.5% and a
$25 million revolving credit commitment. The Senior Credit Facility was
terminated on July 7, 1998. To comply with certain covenants of the Senior
Credit Facility and to reduce the impact of changes in interest rates on the
Senior Credit Facility, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements
with total notional amounts of $75 million in which the Company agreed to
receive a variable rate equal to LIBOR and pay fixed rates ranging from 5.96% to
6.00%. The swap agreements were terminated on July 17, 1998 in exchange for cash
payments of $578,000. The Company expensed the costs associated with the
termination of the swap agreement in July 1998.
On July 7, 1998, the Company issued $200 million principal amount of 1998
Series A Notes. The net proceeds of the Offering was approximately $194.1
million. Of this amount, approximately $126.3 million was used to effect the
Senior Credit Facility Retirement and approximately $22.0 million was placed in
an escrow account to fund the first two interest payments on the 1998 Notes. See
"Description of the 1998 Series B Notes."
The Company's future results of operations will be materially impacted by
its ability to finance its planned business strategies. The Company expects that
it will spend approximately $550 million on capital expenditures over the next
five years. Additionally, the Company will incur approximately $261 million in
cash interest expense over the next five years. The Company currently has
approximately $77 million restricted for scheduled interest payments over the
next eighteen months. The Company expects it will need approximately $200
million in additional financing over the next five years in order to achieve its
business strategy within its targeted markets. A considerable portion of the
Company's capital expenditure requirements is scaleable dependent upon the
number of Rights of Entry that the Company signs. The foregoing estimates are
based on certain assumptions, including the timing of the signing of Rights of
Entry, the conversion of MDUs currently served by SMATV systems to networks and
the telecommunications roll out, each of which may vary significantly from the
Company's plan. The capital expenditure requirements will be larger or smaller
depending upon whether the Company is able to achieve its expected market share
among the potential MDUs in its markets. The Company plans to finance its future
capital requirements through additional public or private equity or debt
offerings. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in
obtaining any necessary financing on reasonable terms or at all.
In addition, both GVL and CDPQ have the power to prevent the Company from
obtaining additional debt or equity financing. See "Risk Factors -- Control by
GVL" and "Principal Stockholders -- Stockholders' Agreement." GVL is party to an
indenture which limits the aggregate amount of indebtedness which can be
incurred by GVL and its subsidiaries, including the Company, taken as a whole
(based upon a ratio of total
46
49
consolidated indebtedness to consolidated operating cash flow). As a result,
GVL's strategies and the operating results of its subsidiaries other than the
Company may affect the ability of the Company to incur additional indebtedness.
As of May 31, 1998, GVL was able to incur approximately Cdn. $612 million
(approximately $390 million based on an exchange rate of $1.00 = Cdn. $1.5683 as
reported by the Wall Street Journal on September 1, 1998) of indebtedness under
its indenture. There can be no assurance that this number may not decrease
substantially in the future. There can be no assurance that GVL will not
restrain the Company's growth or limit the indebtedness incurred by the Company
so as to ensure GVL's compliance with the terms of its debt instruments.
The Company benefits from the fact that it does not require a substantial
capital investment in its cable television and telecommunications networks in
advance of connecting subscribers to its networks since a significant proportion
of the costs comprises the internal wiring and the erection of microwave
transmitting and receiving equipment specific to the MDU. These expenditures
are, to a large extent, "success-based" and will only be incurred when new
properties are brought into service or when existing properties serviced by
SMATV or PBX systems are connected to the networks. When a new Right of Entry is
signed, it takes approximately four months of construction work to activate
signal at the property. Once the property is activated, penetration rates
increase rapidly. The balance of the budgeted capital expenditures is for
infrastructure assets not related to individual MDUs. These assets include
central office switches, cable television head ends, computer hardware and
software and capitalized construction costs. The Company, can to some degree,
control the timing of the infrastructure capital expenditures by controlling the
timing of the telecommunications roll out and the scope of its expansion.
In order to accelerate the achievement of the Company's strategic goals,
the Company is currently evaluating and often engages in discussions regarding
various acquisition opportunities. The Company also engages from time to time in
preliminary discussions relating to possible investments in the Company by
strategic investors. There can be no assurance that any agreement with any
potential acquisition target or strategic investor will be reached nor does
management believe that any thereof is necessary to achieve its strategic goals.
YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
OpTel has implemented a Year 2000 program to ensure that its computer
systems and applications will function properly beyond 1999. OpTel believes that
it has allocated adequate resources for this purpose and expects its Year 2000
conversion program to be successfully completed on a timely basis. However,
successful completion of the Year 2000 conversion program is substantially
dependent upon successful implementation of the Company's new customer
management information system. The Company's financial accounting system has not
been upgraded to eliminate potential Year 2000 related malfunctions. The Company
has selected a new financial accounting system and plans to have the new system
implemented within the next 12 months. Other than expenses relating to the
acquisition of the customer management information system and the financial
accounting system, OpTel does not expect to incur significant expenditures to
address this issue. See "Risk Factors -- Year 2000 Risk."
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 128, "Earnings Per
Share," is effective for earnings per share calculations and disclosures for
periods ending after December 15, 1997, including interim periods, and requires
restatement of all prior period earnings per share data that is presented. SFAS
No. 128 supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 15, "Earnings Per
Share," and provides reporting standards for calculating "Basic" and "Diluted"
earnings per share. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 128 and its earnings per
share computations have been restated for all prior periods.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued, in February 1997,
SFAS No. 129, "Disclosure of Information about Capital Structure," which
establishes standards for disclosing information about an entity's capital
structure and is effective for financial statements for periods ending after
47
50
December 15, 1997. The Company's financial statements comply with the
requirements of SFAS No. 129 and there will be no impact on the Company's
results of operations or financial position.
In June 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive
Income," which establishes standards for the reporting and display of
comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. SFAS No.
130 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997. The Company
has evaluated the requirements of SFAS No. 130 and will begin disclosing the
appropriate information in the first quarter of fiscal 1999. There will be no
impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
The FASB also issued, in June 1997, SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information," which establishes standards
for the way public companies disclose information about operating segments,
products and services, geographic areas and major customers. SFAS No. 131 is
effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15,
1997. The Company is currently evaluating the applicability of the requirements
of SFAS No. 131. Depending on the outcome of the Company's evaluation,
additional disclosure may be required beginning in fiscal 1999. There will be no
impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
INFLATION
The Company does not believe that inflation has had a material effect on
its results of operations to date. However, there can be no assurance that the
Company's business will not be adversely affected by inflation in the future.
48
51
BUSINESS
THE COMPANY
OpTel is a leading network based provider of integrated communications
services, including local and long distance telephone and cable television
services, to residents of MDUs in the United States. As a rapidly growing ICP,
OpTel continues to build upon its position as the largest provider of private
cable television services to MDUs in the United States. In each market that it
serves, OpTel seeks to become the principal competitor in the MDU marketplace to
the ILEC and the incumbent franchise cable television operator by providing a
package of voice, video and Internet access services at competitive prices.
OpTel believes its contractual relationships with MDU owners and associations
and its ability to deliver an integrated service offering to MDU residents over
its own networks provide it with a competitive advantage.
MDUs comprise a wide variety of high density residential complexes,
including high- and low-rise apartment buildings, condominiums, cooperatives,
town houses and mobile home communities. According to 1990 U.S. Census Bureau
data, there are more than 13.2 million dwelling units in MDUs with greater than
10 dwelling units in the United States. Within the MDU market, the Company
focuses on Large MDUs. Based on industry sources, the Company believes that,
within its existing markets, as of March 25, 1998, there are approximately 3.0
million dwelling units within these Large MDUs.
The Company is currently building telecommunications infrastructure in its
serviced markets and expects, by the end of calendar 1999, to be in a position
to offer facilities based telecommunications services in each of its major
markets. The Company presently offers services where it has a Right of Entry to
provide its cable television and/or telecommunications services. The Company
classifies a unit as "passed" if it is within an MDU for which the Company has a
Right of Entry and the Company has connected the equipment necessary to provide
services. As of May 31, 1998, the Company had 369,968 units passed for cable
television services. At that date, OpTel had 202,355 cable television
subscribers and 7,046 telecommunication lines in service.
OpTel began operations in April 1993 with a strategy of consolidating the
then fragmented "private cable" television, or non-franchise cable television,
industry serving MDUs. Securing long-term Rights of Entry has been an integral
element of this strategy. The Company's Rights of Entry typically have original
terms of 10 to 15 years (five years for Rights of Entry with condominium
associations). The weighted average unexpired term of the Company's Rights of
Entry was approximately eight years as of May 31, 1998 (assuming the Company's
exercise of available renewal options). Rights of Entry generally provide
financial incentives to the property owners to promote and sell the Company's
cable television and telecommunications services to MDU residents. The Company
provides video programming to MDUs primarily under exclusive Rights of Entry.
The Company initially offered STS to MDUs serviced under telephone Rights of
Entry utilizing remote PBX switches. In accordance with its communications
strategy, the Company has begun the process of migrating its STS traffic to its
own central office switches and its own network facilities. The Company intends
to grow its business by negotiating additional Rights of Entry to serve MDUs
currently served by other providers and newly-constructed MDUs, by acquiring
other existing operators that serve MDUs, as appropriate, and by providing MDUs
it currently serves for cable television with additional services, such as
telephone and Internet access.
The Company currently provides cable television and telecommunications
services in a number of metropolitan areas including Houston, Dallas-Fort Worth,
Los Angeles, San Diego, Miami-Ft. Lauderdale, Phoenix, Denver, San Francisco,
Chicago, Atlanta and Orlando-Tampa. The Company has commenced offering central
office switched local exchange services in Houston and Dallas-Fort Worth and is
licensed as a CLEC in each of its other major markets. The Company selected its
current markets based upon their growth characteristics, competitive conditions,
MDU concentrations, favorable demographics and regulatory environment.
Since April 1995, OpTel has been indirectly majority owned by GVL, which
also owns the second largest cable television operator in Canada (based on
number of subscribers). GVL has invested approximately $250 million in OpTel in
the form of equity capital and subordinated convertible notes (including accrued
49
52
interest). See "Prospectus Summary -- Recent Developments." These invested
amounts have been critical to OpTel's growth. In addition, key members of the
Company's management team gained experience in the competitive offering of
telecommunications and cable television to residential markets while serving as
executives of a GVL affiliate in the United Kingdom. OpTel management's
extensive operating experience in both the telecommunications and cable
television industries, including the construction and design of networks and
sales and customer support, provides OpTel with significant expertise in
managing and developing an infrastructure to support voice, video and Internet
access operations.
OpTel is a holding company with limited assets that conducts substantially
all of its operations through its subsidiaries. OpTel derives substantially all
of its revenue from the operations of its subsidiaries. OpTel has 22
subsidiaries, each of which generally operates in a specific geographic area.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW -- MARKET OPPORTUNITIES
Widespread Changes in Communications Industry
Both the telephone and cable television segments of the communications
industry are currently undergoing widespread changes brought about by, among
other things, (i) decisions of federal and state regulators which have opened
the monopoly local telephone and cable television markets to competition, (ii)
the ensuing transformation of the previously monopolistic communications market
controlled by heavily regulated incumbents into a consumer-driven competitive
service industry and (iii) the need for higher speed, higher capacity networks
to meet the increasing consumer demand for expanded communications services
including broader video choices and high speed Internet services. The
convergence of these trends has created opportunities for new types of
communications companies capable of providing a wide range of voice, video and
data services.
Opening of Communications Markets
Divestiture of the Bell System. Until the passage of recent federal
legislative reform and other state and federal regulatory efforts to expand
competition into the local telephone market, the structure of the U.S.
telecommunications industry was shaped principally by the 1984 court-supervised
divestiture of local telephone services from AT&T (the "Divestiture") and other
judicial and regulatory initiatives which were designed primarily to implement
structural and technical industry changes through which competition could
develop in the long distance market. Under this structure, the RBOCs and certain
other LECs were permitted to retain their monopolies in the provision of local
exchange services, but were required to connect their local subscribers to the
long-distance services of AT&T and other IXCs. Under this regime, two distinct
industry segments developed; competitive IXCs, which offered subscribers long
distance telephone services between judicially defined LATAs, and monopoly LECs,
which offered subscribers local and toll services within judicially defined
LATAs, including connection (or "access") to IXCs for interLATA long-distance
services. As a result, the long-distance business became intensely competitive,
with low barriers to entry and many service providers competing in a
commodity-type market, while providers of local exchange services continued to
face relatively little competition.
Deregulation of Local Telephone Services. After the structural and
technical network changes were put in place following the Divestiture to give
IXCs other than AT&T "equal access" to the local exchange facilities of the
monopoly ILECs, and with long-distance competition beginning to provide
consumers with diverse services and lower rates, regulatory policy makers
gradually began to examine whether the competitive benefits which were being
experienced in the long-distance marketplace as a result of Divestiture should
be expanded to local exchange services. While a small number of states and the
FCC had already adopted rules and regulations which opened certain limited and
discrete segments of the local exchange market to competition from CAPs and
CLECs offering primarily dedicated high-speed private line and some local
switching services to large business users, the passage of the Telecom Act in
February 1996 codified the pro-competitive policies on a national level and
required both the FCC and the state regulatory commissions to adopt dramatic and
sweeping changes in their rules and regulations in furtherance of those
policies. The Telecom Act required regulators to remove market entry barriers
and to enable companies like OpTel to
50
53
become full service providers of local telephone service by, among other things,
mandating that the ILECs provide interconnection and competitively priced
network facilities to competitors. In addition, the Telecom Act permits RBOCs to
offer long-distance interLATA services in competition with IXCs once they have
demonstrated that they have implemented changes to permit economically efficient
competition in their local markets for both business and residential services.
The Telecom Act also repealed the LEC/cable television cross-ownership
restriction, which prohibited LECs from providing multichannel television
directly to subscribers in their telephone service areas. See "-- Regulation."
Deregulation of Cable Television. Unlike the local telephone market, the
cable television market is not subject to regulatory or statutory prohibitions
on competition. Nevertheless, competition to incumbent franchised cable
television operators has developed in only a handful of markets nationwide.
Because of the lack of any meaningful competition, in 1992, Congress passed
legislation providing for the regulation of certain cable rates. Subsequently,
as part of its general goal of supplanting regulation with competition, the
Telecom Act took further steps to provide alternative regulatory structures to
encourage entry into the multichannel video programming distribution market.
OpTel's Opportunity. The incumbent local telephone and cable television
providers to date have generally been slow to expand their services beyond their
traditional lines of business. In particular, the LECs generally have not
offered video programming services, nor have the incumbent cable operators
generally entered the telephone services market. In addition, most of the other
new competitive entrants, including most CLECs, have focused almost exclusively
on providing telephone service to medium to large commercial customers and have
tailored the coverage area of their networks and the configuration of their
business operations to provide services accordingly. Similarly, while a number
of companies have begun to market wireless alternatives to cable television
service, those companies have not generally begun to offer telephone services to
their customers.
Typically, the last mile connection between an ILEC and its customer is a
copper wire twisted pair and the last mile connection of a cable television
company is coaxial cable. The Company believes that in its markets, it is the
only competitor able to serve a single subscriber with both twisted pair and
coaxial cable last mile connections. Accordingly, OpTel believes that it is
well-positioned to take advantage of the new regulatory and market environment
and that it will be among the first to offer a single-source package of
integrated voice, video and Internet access services in its MDU markets. By
combining the enhanced telephone and Internet access services offered by CLECs
with high quality video programming, OpTel will act as a single source provider
of a wide range of voice, video and Internet access services to the MDU market.
OpTel's integrated service offerings are available either individually or in
bundled packages, providing the consumer with added choice and convenience.
STRATEGY
OpTel's goal is to become the nation's largest ICP focusing on MDU markets.
OpTel's strategy for achieving this goal includes the following key components:
Provide an Integrated Service Offering. OpTel believes that by utilizing a
single advanced network infrastructure it can be among the first to market a
competitive integrated package of voice and video services in its target
markets. OpTel focuses exclusively on the integrated communications needs of the
MDU resident, which distinguishes OpTel from other competitors. OpTel believes
that MDU residents are attracted by bundled service offerings, competitive
pricing and integrated billing. The Company plans to supplement its voice and
video offerings with high speed Internet access in all of its serviced markets.
The Company also intends to introduce integrated billing of its bundled services
during fiscal 1999.
Deploy Cost Effective Networks. OpTel's networks are specifically designed
to provide services to MDUs. The Company uses a combination of point-to-point
microwave transmission equipment and fiber optic cable in order to offer a
single source for video, voice telecommunications and eventually high speed
Internet access services. A substantial amount of the capital required to
provide property-specific voice and video services to an individual MDU is
invested only after the Company and the owner of the MDU have entered into a
Right of Entry for the MDU. The capital expenditures required to serve an MDU
are therefore, to a
51
54
large extent, "success-based" and will only be incurred shortly before
properties are first brought into service or as needed to bring non-network
served MDUs onto the Company's networks. In markets served by the Company's
microwave networks, OpTel expects that the incremental capital required for it
to launch central office switched telecommunications services and to connect
customers will be lower than that of its competitors. Unlike copper- and
fiber-based systems that require installation and maintenance of a significant
amount of wire and cable, the Company's microwave networks generally will not
require the installation and maintenance of physical wires between the MDU based
equipment and the Company's Network Hubs. As a result, OpTel expects to enjoy a
lower network cost structure than certain of its competitors.
Pursue Focused Marketing Strategy. Strategic relationships with MDU owners
are a key element of the Company's marketing strategy. The Company negotiates
long term Rights of Entry with MDU owners under which the Company obtains, among
other things, the exclusive right to provide cable television services to an MDU
or group of MDUs and an undertaking by the MDU owner to promote OpTel as the
preferred telecommunications alternative to the ILEC within the MDU. The Rights
of Entry generally provide MDU owners with financial incentives to work closely
with the Company to promote its products and services. The Company offers
prospective customers the opportunity to subscribe for Company services at the
same time they sign their unit leases. The Company believes this access, coupled
with customer preference for a single source of cable television and
telecommunications services, significantly enhances its customer marketing
efforts. In addition, the Company markets to MDU residents through (i) direct
mail and direct sales campaigns, (ii) special promotion and sign-up parties,
(iii) establishment of a physical presence at a MDU and (iv) distribution of
point-of-sale marketing materials.
Provide Superior Customer Service. The Company believes that superior
customer service is important to MDU residents. Therefore, the Company has
dedicated resources to providing services that attract and retain subscribers.
The Company has a national customer service center staffed with knowledgeable
representatives to address the needs of customers 24-hours-a-day,
seven-days-a-week. The Company has established direct lines to facilitate rapid
response to calls initiated by MDU owners and managers. The Company also has
dedicated local service teams that provide prompt installation and response to
customer service calls. Because the Company believes that the best way to
control the quality and consistency of technical and field services is to train
and supervise the service technicians, the Company relies primarily on its own
personnel to perform these functions. The Company also has established stringent
staff training procedures, including its Operational Excellence continuous
improvement program, and internal customer service standards.
Pursue Selective Acquisitions and Strategic Relationships. To expand its
markets and to achieve critical mass in its existing markets, the Company often
evaluates opportunities to make acquisitions. Since May 1996, the Company has
completed six acquisitions representing approximately 700 MDUs served and
103,000 subscribers. In addition, the Company has entered into a strategic
relationship for the delivery of high speed Internet access services and will
continue to evaluate other alliances, including those permitting it to host
additional third-party traffic on its switches.
MARKETS
Historically, the Company's strategy has been to enter markets either
through the acquisition of private cable television operators serving the target
market or by entering into Rights of Entry with a major MDU owner in the market.
Upon acquisition of an operator, the Company historically has begun the process
of upgrading the acquired systems by converting MDUs from SMATV technology to
the Company's microwave or, in Houston, fiber optic networks, adding additional
programming and improving customer service. In addition, the Company has been
able to achieve cost efficiencies by consolidating acquired operations into its
existing organization. The Company's strategy for entering new
telecommunications markets is through the deployment of network infrastructure
and interconnecting such infrastructure to the Company's existing video
distribution network. See "-- Network Architecture."
The following table sets forth, as of May 31, 1998, the markets where OpTel
currently operates and, for each such market, certain additional information
including the date the Company launched, or intends to
52
55
launch, its central office switched telecommunications service offering. The
timing and order of the launch of central office switched telecommunications
services in each of the Company's markets may vary and will depend on a number
of factors, and no assurance can be given the Company will launch such services
in each of its markets.
NUMBER OF
UNITS
NUMBER OF IN MDUS CABLE
UNITS IN WITH OVER 150 UNITS PASSED TELEVISION TELECOMMUNICATIONS EXPECTED CLEC SERVICES
LOCATION MARKET(1) UNITS(2) FOR CABLE(3) SUBSCRIBERS LINES IN SERVICE LAUNCH DATE
- -------- --------- ------------- ------------ ----------- ------------------ ----------------------
Houston.................... 363,000 315,000 137,122 67,265 2,143 In service
Dallas-Fort Worth.......... 486,000 405,000 44,217 21,929 2,187 In service
Los Angeles................ 730,000 295,000 17,777 11,072 75 Fiscal 1999
San Diego.................. 504,000 304,000 21,224 12,428 164 Fiscal 1999
Miami-Ft. Lauderdale....... 234,000 225,000 21,205 16,497 162 Fiscal 1999
Phoenix.................... 219,000 155,000 24,648 10,047 117 Fiscal 1999
Denver..................... 142,000 106,000 17,006 9,804 291 Fiscal 1999
San Francisco.............. 410,000 246,000 24,466 17,065 68 Fiscal 1999
Chicago.................... 417,000 342,000 29,708 18,017 133 Fiscal 1999
Atlanta.................... 285,000 233,000 9,456 5,146 75 Fiscal 2000
Orlando-Tampa.............. 240,000 205,000 11,396 7,202 245 Fiscal 2000
Other markets(4)........... -- -- 11,743 5,883 1,386
--------- --------- ------- ------- -----
Total(5)........... 4,030,000 2,831,000 369,968 202,355 7,046
========= ========= ======= ======= =====
- ---------------
(1) Represents rental units in MDUs and is based on March 25, 1998 information
published by industry sources. The number of units does not include
condominiums. According to 1990 U.S. Census Bureau data there were 1.8
million dwelling units in condominiums in the Company's markets.
(2) Represents rental units in MDUs with more than 150 dwelling units in the
United States and is based on March 25, 1998 information published by
industry sources. The number of units in MDUs with greater than 150 units
does not include condominiums.
(3) Units passed represents the number of units to which the Company has
connected its cable television systems. As of May 31, 1998, the Company had
connected telecommunications infrastructure at only 28,971 of the units
passed for cable television services.
(4) Other markets include Austin, Corpus Christi and San Antonio, Texas; Daytona
Beach and Tallahassee, Florida; Las Vegas, Nevada; Indianapolis, Indiana;
and greater Washington, D.C. Other than with respect to Austin, Texas and
Indianapolis, Indiana, the Company has not yet decided whether to
concentrate in these markets and launch telecommunication services or to
dispose of assets in these markets.
(5) Excludes 27,313 units passed for cable, 14,751 cable television subscribers,
and 654 telecommunications lines in services related to the portion of the
acquisition of the ICS Operations for which, as of May 31, 1998, the
transfer conditions had not yet been satisfied.
The Company installed its first central office switch in the Houston market
in October 1997 and currently offers switched access local exchange services to
most of its telecommunications customers in Houston. The Company installed,
activated and tested its central office switch in the Dallas-Fort Worth market
in April 1998 and is currently providing switched access local exchange services
to select customers in Dallas-Fort Worth. As of May 31, 1998, the Company had
48,472 units under contract for telecommunications in Houston and Dallas-Fort
Worth. The Company intends to progressively commence full scale marketing of
local exchange based telecommunications services in all of its major markets by
the end of calendar 1999. The Company is licensed as a CLEC in all of its major
markets and has completed or is negotiating interconnection agreements with the
principal ILECs in each of these markets.
SERVICES
OpTel provides a wide range of voice, video and Internet access services,
both individually and as integrated service offerings.
Voice. OpTel's telephone Rights of Entry generally provide that the MDU
owner will market exclusively OpTel's local telephone services to MDU residents.
In the markets where it has central office switches, OpTel offers local exchange
telephone service, including standard dial tone access and substantially all
other feature groups provided by the ILEC. OpTel offers a wide range of
value-added services, including call forwarding, call waiting, caller
identification, conference calling, speed dial, calling card, 800-numbers and
voice mail.
53
56
OpTel generally prices its local telephone offering at a discount to the ILEC
rates in each of its serviced markets. OpTel also provides long distance
services, including outbound, inbound and calling card services. OpTel contracts
or plans to contract for other ancillary services, including operator service,
directory listings and emergency 911 service and, in certain markets, transport,
from the local ILEC and other service providers.
The Company currently provides telephone service under two regulatory
frameworks. In Houston and Dallas-Fort Worth, the Company provides telephone
services as a CLEC through Company owned central office switches. In other
markets, and to a limited extent in Houston and Dallas-Fort Worth, OpTel
provides telephone services as an STS provider. The Company intends to convert
substantially all of its STS telephone operations to CLEC operations and to
provide switched access local exchange services to substantially all of its
telephone customers by the end of calendar 1999.
Video. OpTel offers its subscribers a full range of popular cable
television programming at competitive prices. The Company's networks are capable
of delivering up to 72 uncompressed analog channels of programming. The Company
offers various programming packages to its cable television subscribers. The
Company's basic video programming package provides extensive channel selection
featuring all major cable and broadcast networks. The Company's premium video
programming package features uninterrupted, full-length motion pictures,
sporting events, concerts and other entertainment programming and includes HBO,
Cinemax, Showtime and The Movie Channel, as well as supplementary channels such
as HBO 2, HBO 3 and Cinemax 2. Premium services are offered individually or in
discounted packages with basic or other services. Certain of the Company's
systems are capable of offering movies, sporting events, concerts and other
special events on a pay-per-view basis.
In addition, the programming selections available at an MDU served by the
Company's microwave networks can be tailored to the demographics of each MDU
and, unlike franchise cable television systems which may be required to carry
all local broadcast channels and public access channels, the Company's microwave
networks can utilize all of their available channels to provide popular
entertainment, news and information programming.
The Company's programming packages are generally competitively priced
compared to similar packages offered by the incumbent franchise cable television
operator.
To enhance its video programming offerings, the Company has made
arrangements with a DBS service provider for distribution of additional video
programming via DBS technology. The Company currently provides this programming
on a limited basis to MDUs in its San Francisco and Miami-Ft. Lauderdale markets
using a single, standard direct broadcast satellite receiving antenna at each
serviced MDU. The DBS signal is received in digital form, converted at the MDU
receiver site to analog form and over coaxial cable distributed to the
subscriber's unit. DBS transport permits the Company to provide basic
programming or to supplement the Company's other programming services.
High-Speed Internet Access. OpTel currently provides Internet access
service to residents of certain properties in the Houston market in
collaboration with a local ISP and a local CAP. OpTel is currently testing a
high-speed Internet access service in Dallas-Fort Worth in conjunction with
I(3)S, Inc. ("I(3)S"), an ISP. The Company and I(3)S have a strategic alliance
to provide high-speed Internet services in the Company's major markets.
Following successful completion of its testing, the Company intends to roll out
its high speed Internet access service in substantially all of its major
markets.
The Company expects to offer customers a choice of transmission speeds
ranging from approximately 64 kilobits ("KB") per second (normal dial-up
Internet speed is typically 28.8 KB per second) to 10 megabits ("MB") per
second. In MDUs where data transport is to be provided via the Company's
networks, the Company expects to be able to offer transmission speeds of up to
10 MB per second. In MDUs where the Company utilizes leased transport
facilities, the Company may choose to offer transmission speeds of up to 1.5 MB
per second; however, higher transmission speeds could be offered through the
lease of incremental bandwidth. Internet connections providing transmission
speeds over 0.5 MB per second are generally referred to as "high-speed." The
transmission speeds that the Company intends to offer will greatly exceed the 64
KB
54
57
per second speed available from many LECs through Integrated Services Digital
Network ("ISDN") technology.
OpTel initially will connect each property to the ISP's point of presence
using OpTel's microwave transport or its owned or leased fiber transport. At
each property, the data stream will be carried to the subscriber's unit via the
property's existing coaxial cable distribution wiring. The subscriber will
connect a personal computer to the high-speed Internet service using software
provided by the ISP and the subscriber's cable modem which will be connected to
a standard cable television outlet.
Wholesale Services to ISPs. The Company believes that with the recent
growth in demand for Internet services, numerous ISPs are unable to obtain
network capacity rapidly enough to meet customer demand and eliminate network
congestion problems. The Company plans to supplement its core end user product
offerings by providing a full array of local services to ISPs, including
telephone numbers and switched and dedicated access to the Internet.
NETWORK ARCHITECTURE
The Company's strategy is to deliver all of its service offerings through
integrated networks. OpTel's networks are designed specifically to provide
services to MDUs. The Company uses a combination of point-to-point microwave
transmission equipment and fiber optic cable in order to offer a single source
for video, voice telecommunications and eventually high speed Internet access
services. As of May 31, 1998, the Company had 46 microwave networks in service
in eleven metropolitan areas, and, in Houston, three fiber optic networks,
covering over 400 route miles. In order to integrate service offerings, the
Company actively adds properties it services within existing network coverage to
these networks and seeks to cost effectively develop new networks to cover MDU
clusters serviced by the Company in new or expanded markets.
To maximize network coverage of its microwave networks, the Company
establishes hubs designed to service MDU clusters (each a "Network Hub").
Network Hubs usually are located on rooftops or towers. The network is extended
from the Network Hubs to the serviced MDUs via point-to-point microwave. Each
Network Hub includes equipment to receive and transmit the Company's video
programming. The signal is transmitted to a receiving dish at the MDU which must
be within the line of site of the Network Hub or a repeater site. To ensure
transmission quality, the Company limits the radius of each microwave link to
between four and ten miles, depending on topographic and climatic conditions.
Within the MDUs it serves, the Company distributes video programming via
conventional coaxial cable. The on-property network uses a combination of traps
(electronic filtering devices), addressable decoder-converter boxes and
interdiction. The Company has recently completed field testing interdiction
devices and has begun deploying them in several of its current systems.
Interdiction devices will permit the Company to activate and deactivate services
or specific channels by remote command from a centralized location. When
implemented, these devices will afford quicker activation and disconnection,
eliminate or significantly reduce the need for traps and for decoder-converter
boxes in the home, eliminate or significantly reduce service calls and provide
better picture quality. The Company believes that these devices will also result
in better collection experience, higher premium service penetration and greater
customer satisfaction.
OpTel's network design is digital capable. All voice traffic over OpTel's
networks is digitally compressed. The networks will facilitate digital
compression for video signal when economical and required by the marketplace. If
OpTel is required to carry digital broadcast programming (e.g., HDTV), then the
networks may be upgraded to transmit such programming without material
architectural change. See "-- Regulation."
The Company transports video programming to MDUs which are not yet on the
Company's networks by receiving video programming at a self-contained SMATV head
end located at the MDU. The Company intends to convert substantially all of its
SMATV systems to 18GHz, 12GHz (principally in Denver) or fiber optic networks by
the end of fiscal 2000.
To roll out its central office switched voice telecommunications offering
in areas covered by its microwave networks, the Company will link certain of its
Network Hubs to both the central office switch and other Network Hubs to form a
network backbone. This network backbone will utilize either of 6GHz or 11GHz
55
58
microwave or fiber optic transmission capacity to form synchronous optical
network ("SONET") self-healing rings that provide high speed redundant
connections for the delivery of voice traffic. Where it uses fiber, the Company
either will install its own fiber optic facilities or on a limited basis will
lease fiber from other providers. Voice traffic will be delivered from a Network
Hub to a serviced MDU over 23GHz microwave links. The 23GHz microwave links will
use the same microwave transmission equipment that is used to relay video
signal. Voice traffic is delivered to the individual unit using a traditional
copper wire twisted pair. The Company has recently commenced offering network
based central office switched telecommunication services in Houston over its
fiber optic networks and in Dallas-Fort Worth over its microwave networks.
The Company has chosen the 5ESS-2000 digital switch manufactured by Lucent.
Unlike traditional long distance or local switches, the Lucent switch enables
the Company to provide local and long distance services from a single platform.
This uniform and advanced switch platform enables the Company to (i) deploy
features and functions quickly in all of its networks, (ii) expand switch
capacity in a cost effective manner and (iii) lower maintenance costs through
reduced training and spare part requirements. The Company expects to continue to
deploy Lucent switches to provide a consistent technology platform throughout
its network. The Company will use its networks to aggregate MDU long distance
and local traffic at its central office switch. As an initial entry strategy in
certain markets, the Company intends to lease telecommunication switch capacity
in certain markets from third-party providers in order to accelerate the roll
out of telephone services and to migrate telecommunications services to its own
switch over time. OpTel has entered into an agreement with a national CLEC,
pursuant to which OpTel may purchase local telephone service and local loop
elements. During any time period and in any market that the Company is
purchasing such services from the CLEC, the CLEC has the exclusive right to
provide OpTel with these services. OpTel is required to maintain each service
ordered for a 24-month minimum period.
In areas where the Company offers telecommunications services but where it
has not yet migrated to its networked central office switch architecture, a PBX
switch is installed at the MDU and traffic from the MDU is transported via
leased trunk lines to the LEC's central office. From the LEC's central office,
local calls are routed through the LEC's network. The Company intends to convert
all of its PBX serviced properties to its central office switched
telecommunications offering.
OpTel has contracted with a third party to monitor its central office
switches and certain network elements connected to those switches. In 1999,
OpTel will establish a Network Operations Center to internalize the functions
now provided by the third party and to enhance monitoring, control and
maintenance of its networks. OpTel's Network Operational Center will be located
at its Dallas headquarters and will be staffed 24-hours-a-day,
seven-days-a-week. The Network Operations Center will monitor and manage OpTel's
central office telephone switches, PBX switches and certain additional elements
of its telecommunications and cable television networks.
SALES AND MARKETING
A critical aspect of the Company's sales and marketing efforts is the
development of strategic contractual relationships with MDU owners. These
relationships encourage the owners to promote and sell the Company's cable
television and telecommunications services to MDU residents. The Company intends
to grow its business by negotiating additional Rights of Entry to serve MDUs
currently served by other providers and newly-constructed MDUs, by acquiring
other existing operators that serve MDUs, as appropriate, and by providing MDUs
it currently serves for cable television with additional services, such as
telephone and Internet access.
The Company tailors its sales and marketing efforts to two different
constituencies: (i) owners of MDUs and their agents and (ii) residents at MDUs
for which the Company has obtained Rights of Entry. Each constituency is served
by a separate sales and marketing team.
Sales and Marketing to MDU Owners
The Company maintains a full-time professional sales force dedicated to
securing Rights of Entry from owners of MDUs. Many of the Company's sales
representatives have previous experience in commercial real
56
59
estate sales and leasing. The Company has developed an incentive compensation
plan for sales personnel which the Company believes encourages sales personnel
to target MDUs with more favorable demographic characteristics.
Marketing to local MDU owners is conducted primarily by (i) using
established relationships with property developers, owners and management
companies, (ii) direct mail and direct sales campaigns to owners and apartment
managers, (iii) canvassing MDU owners with properties within the coverage of the
Company's existing and planned networks and (iv) attending and participating in
trade shows, conventions and seminars targeted to the MDU industry. In addition,
the Company markets to owners of large multiregional portfolios of MDUs via a
dedicated sales team. When marketing to MDUs, the Company emphasizes the
following competitive advantages:
New Revenue Source for MDU Owner. An MDU owner who enters into a Right of
Entry with the Company generally receives a percentage of the revenue generated
by the MDU. The revenue sharing percentages generally range between six and ten
percent of such revenue, are often scaled based on penetration and are fixed
over the term of the Right of Entry. The Company may from time to time pay
up-front "key-money" in lieu of or in combination with revenue participation.
While some franchise cable television operators and ILECs now offer revenue
sharing and access fee arrangements to some MDU owners, it is the Company's
experience that neither the ILECs nor the incumbent franchise cable television
operators are generally willing to offer broad-based, revenue-based incentive
compensation to MDU owners.
Property Enhancements. The Company often installs a package of
telecommunications and security enhancements at the MDUs it serves, at a nominal
cost or at no cost to the MDU owner. For example, the Company can install a
monitoring camera at the main entrance that permits MDU residents to identify
guests by tuning their television set to the building's security channel. In
addition, the Company often provides a dedicated information channel that
permits the building's management to send messages to the MDU residents over the
private cable television system. These enhancements are relatively inexpensive
for the Company to provide and can be important to MDU owners and property
managers.
New Marketing Tool and Amenity to Rent Apartments. The principal concern of
an MDU owner is to rent apartments. The Company believes that its services and
property enhancements can serve as an important marketing tool for owners to
attract prospective tenants because its services are generally provided at a
price competitive with those charged by the franchise cable operator and lower
than those charged by the ILEC and long distance carriers. The Company works
with on-site managers to emphasize the benefits of the Company's services and
the added value and convenience provided by the Company. The Company also
maintains direct lines to facilitate rapid response to customer support calls
initiated by MDU owners and managers.
Marketing to MDU Residents
Once an MDU owner executes a Right of Entry, the Company aggressively
markets its services to actual and potential subscribers within the MDU in order
to increase penetration rates for basic and additional services. The Company
believes that its best opportunity for a sale arises when a resident first signs
a lease and takes occupancy in an MDU. Accordingly, the Company believes that
during the first few years after it activates cable television or
telecommunications services at an MDU it benefits from the high rate of MDU
resident turnover. The Company has developed orientation and incentive programs
for on-site property managers and leasing agents, with the objective of
enlisting them as the Company's subscriber sales force. In addition, the Company
markets to MDU residents through (i) direct mail and direct sales campaigns,
(ii) special promotions and sign-up parties, (iii) establishment of a physical
presence at a building and (iv) distribution of point-of-sale marketing
materials. The Company stresses the following themes when marketing its services
to MDU tenants:
Simplicity and Convenience. In general, a subscriber can order any of the
Company's services through the MDU's leasing agent at the time of lease signing.
In addition, in certain of its markets, the Company is able to provide one-stop
shopping for both cable television and telecommunications services.
57
60
Competitive Pricing. The Company believes it offers a competitive
telecommunications offering and cable television channel line-up (often
including pay-per-view and premium services) at prices that are generally
competitive with those charged by the ILEC and local franchise cable television
operator. Upon introduction of its integrated billing system, the Company plans
to offer pricing incentives to purchase more than one service from OpTel.
Superior Video Offering. The number of channels provided by the Company at
an MDU generally equals or exceeds that of the local franchise operator in that
market. In addition, the programming selections available at an MDU served by
the Company's microwave networks can be tailored to the demographic
characteristics of the MDU and, unlike franchise cable television systems which
may be required to carry all local broadcast channels and public access
channels, the Company's microwave networks can utilize all of their available
channels to provide popular programming.
Better Service and Quality. The Company is upgrading its networks and
support systems to ensure continued reliable, high quality delivery of a range
of cable television and telecommunications services and expanding its offerings
to encompass a broad range of value-added telecommunications services. The
Company is committed to providing excellent customer service. The Company
believes the most effective means of attracting and retaining MDU owners and
subscribers is by providing high quality subscriber service, including: (i)
maintaining a 24-hour-a-day, seven-day-a-week subscriber telephone support, (ii)
computerized tracking of all incoming calls to minimize waiting times, (iii)
scheduling service calls generally the same day the subscriber indicates a
service problem, (iv) scheduling flexible, seven-day-a-week installation and
service appointments, (v) placing follow-up calls and on-site inspections to
verify subscriber satisfaction and (vi) completing 80% of installations within
three business days of receiving the initial installation request, often within
24 hours. The Company also uses focus groups and subscriber surveys to monitor
subscriber satisfaction.
STRATEGIC RELATIONSHIPS WITH MDU OWNERS
A critical aspect of the Company's growth strategy is the development of
strategic relationships with owners of MDU portfolios. These relationships
encourage the MDU owner (which may be an ownership association) to promote and
sell the Company's cable television and telecommunications services to MDU
residents.
The Company solicits and negotiates Rights of Entry with owners of
national, regional and local portfolios of MDUs, as well as with institutions
such as hospitals, universities and hotels. The Company's Rights of Entry
typically have original terms of ten to fifteen years (five years for Rights of
Entry with condominium associations). The weighted average unexpired term of the
Company's Rights of Entry was approximately eight years as of May 31, 1998
(assuming the Company's exercise of available renewal options).
Many Rights of Entry provide MDU owners with financial incentives to work
closely with the Company to promote its products and services. Financial
incentives may include revenue sharing or payment of up-front inducements to MDU
owners. In addition, the Company believes that the delivery of special services
tailored to MDU owners and residents provides marketing advantages to the MDU
owner in leasing its units. The Rights of Entry acquired by the Company through
its various acquisitions (which represent approximately 77% of the Company's
units under contract as of May 31, 1998) have not always contained all of the
foregoing terms and provisions.
The long-term Rights of Entry negotiated with MDU owners effectively make
the Company the exclusive multichannel television provider, leaving MDU
residents with the option of receiving multichannel television from the Company
or receiving off-air programming from local broadcasters. Rights of Entry
covering telecommunications include an undertaking by the MDU owner to promote
OpTel as the preferred telecommunications alternative to the ILEC within the
MDU. The Company believes that the development of strategic relationships with
MDU owners will enable the Company to maintain its preferred competitive
position even if the exclusivity of the Rights of Entry becomes limited by
future developments. However, statutory limitations on exclusivity could
adversely affect the Company's ability to form new strategic
58
61
relationships with MDU owners and could increase the capital costs associated
therewith. See "Risk Factors -- Risks Associated with Rights of Entry."
COMPETITION
OpTel competes with a wide range of service providers for each of the
services it provides. Substantially all markets for voice, video and Internet
services are highly competitive, and the Company expects that competition will
intensify. In each of its markets, the Company faces significant competition
from larger companies with greater access to capital, technology and other
competitive resources. The Company's switched local exchange services compete
with ILECs, other STS providers, CLECs and CAPs and will compete with long
distance telephone companies and franchise cable television operators as they
begin to enter the local telephone business. The Company's long distance
services compete with established IXCs and resellers. In addition, recent
telecommunications offerings, including PCS, and future offerings may increase
competition in the telecommunications industry. The Company's private cable
television services compete with incumbent franchise cable television operators
as well as wireless cable television operators, other private cable television
operators, DBS operators and stand-alone satellite service providers. Recent and
future legislative, regulatory and technological developments likely will result
in additional competition in each of the markets in which the Company competes.
Moreover, mergers, joint ventures and alliances among franchise, wireless or
private cable television operators, RBOCs and IXCs may result in providers
capable of offering bundled cable television and telecommunications services in
direct competition with the Company. Although the Company as a matter of course
investigates new sources of programming and technologies that may increase its
range of services, other larger and more diversified competitors may attract the
targeted MDUs based on their increased menu of services. While the Company
believes that the exclusivity provisions of its Rights of Entry provide it with
competitive advantages, such advantages may be significantly diminished by
technological and other developments beyond the control of the Company. In
addition, technological developments may allow competitors of the Company to
bypass property owners altogether and market their services directly to tenants
of MDUs. See "Risk Factors -- Risks Associated with Rights of Entry" and
"-- Competition."
Certain of the Company's current and potential competitors are described
below.
ILECs. In each of its markets, OpTel faces, and expects to continue to
face, significant competition for the local exchange services it offers from the
ILECs, which currently dominate their local telephone markets. OpTel competes
with the ILECs in its markets on the basis of product offerings (including the
ability to offer integrated voice and video services), reliability, technology
and customer service, as well as price.
In addition, under the Telecom Act and ensuing federal and state regulatory
initiatives, barriers to local exchange competition are being removed. The
introduction of such competition, however, also establishes the predicate for
the incumbent RBOCs to provide in-region interexchange long distance services.
The RBOCs are currently allowed to offer "incidental" long distance service
in-region and to offer out-of-region long distance service. Once the RBOCs are
allowed to offer in-region long distance services, they will also be in a
position to offer single source local and long distance service similar to that
offered by OpTel and proposed by the three largest IXCs (AT&T, MCI and Sprint
Corporation). The Company expects that the increased competition made possible
by regulatory reform will result in certain pricing and margin pressures in the
telecommunications services businesses. See "Risk Factors -- Regulation" and
"-- Regulation."
OpTel has sought, and will continue to seek, to provide a full range of
local voice services in competition with ILECs in its service areas. The Company
expects to compete in this market by (i) establishing strategic relationships
with MDU owners so as to allow the Company to market effectively to MDU
residents, (ii) providing value added, enhanced services to MDU residents, (iii)
bundling its telecommunications and cable television services, (iv) providing a
high level of customer service and responsiveness and (v) competitively pricing
its products.
The Telecom Act permits the ILECs and others to provide a wide variety of
video services directly to subscribers in competition with OpTel. Various LECs
currently provide video services within and outside their telephone service
areas through a variety of distribution methods, including both the deployment
of broadband
59
62
wire facilities and the use of wireless transmission facilities. The Company
cannot predict the likelihood of success of video service ventures by LECs or
the impact on the Company of such competitive ventures.
CLECs and Other Competitors. OpTel also faces, and expects to continue to
face, competition from other potential competitors in certain of its markets.
Other CLECs compete for local telephone services, although they have to date
focused primarily on the market for corporate customers. In addition, potential
competitors capable of offering private line and special access services also
include other smaller long distance carriers, cable television companies,
electric utilities, microwave carriers, wireless telephone system operators and
private networks built by large end-users. However, OpTel believes that it will
be among the first to offer an integrated package of voice, video and Internet
access services to customers in MDUs.
Incumbent Franchise Cable Systems. The Company's major competition for
cable television Rights of Entry in each market comes from the incumbent
franchise cable television operator. In certain markets serviced by the Company,
franchise cable television operators now offer revenue sharing and access fee
arrangements to MDU owners. There can be no assurance that these payments will
not increase in the future as competition increases for access to the higher
quality MDUs. Another basis of competition is the breadth of programming and
range of services offered. The Company competes with franchise cable operators
by (i) focusing exclusively on MDUs, (ii) sharing profits with MDU owners, (iii)
providing an integrated product offering that to an increasing extent in the
future will include Internet services, (iv) offering customized programming and
(v) charging lower cable and local telephone rates to subscribers.
Multipoint Multichannel Distribution Systems. MMDS systems are similar to
the Company's 18GHz and 12GHz networks in that they use microwave transmitting
and receiving equipment. MMDS differs from 18GHz and 12GHz in that (i) it
"broadcasts" its video programming directly to individual subscribers and
generally not to an MDU's receiver and (ii) its systems transmit in an
omni-directional manner, while 18GHz systems are point-to-point. As a result,
MMDS wireless cable can provide service to all households within a wireless
operator's "line-of-sight." The 2.5GHz spectrum utilized by MMDS wireless cable
was initially allocated by the FCC to applicants other than MMDS operators
within a given market, with 20 of the available channels generally allocated to
educational institutions. As a result, MMDS wireless operators have had
difficulty acquiring or leasing the critical mass of channels required to offer
a diverse programming lineup. Moreover, absent digital compression technology,
channel capacity is limited to 33 analog channels.
Local Multipoint Distribution Service. The FCC has issued rules
reallocating the 28GHz band to create a new local exchange and video programming
delivery service referred to as local multipoint distribution service ("LMDS").
LMDS systems, like MMDS, will use point-to-multipoint microwave distribution.
Unlike MMDS, however, LMDS systems, using the proposed allocation in the 28GHz
band, will be able to provide channel capacity equal or greater to that of most
cable systems, including the Company's cable systems. In addition, LMDS systems
may include subscriber-to-hub transmission capabilities, which would allow them
to provide interactive and telecommunication services. In March 1998, the FCC
completed its auction of LMDS licenses. So far, however, there has been no
significant commercial deployment of LMDS systems in the Company's serviced
markets.
SMATV Systems. The largest number of private cable companies are operators
of SMATV systems. Like the Company, these SMATV operators offer a multichannel
television service pursuant to Rights of Entry with MDU owners. Where the
Company has introduced or will introduce 18GHz systems, the Company competes
with SMATV systems on the basis of (i) larger channel offerings (typically SMATV
offers 33 to 45 channels), (ii) the quality of its video programming delivery,
(iii) customer service and (iv) the perceived high price of SMATV relative to
the programming package provided.
Direct Broadcast Satellite. DBS systems involve the transmission of encoded
video programming direct from a satellite to the home user without any
intermediate processing or retransmission by a terrestrial operator. Although
prices have been decreasing, DBS service typically requires the purchase of
equipment and installation fees which are a significant cost to the subscriber.
In addition, subscribers generally pay a monthly programming fee to receive DBS
service, which can be lower than those charged by the Company before
consideration of the equipment costs. However, the Company believes that it can
effectively compete with DBS systems in the MDU marketplace for the following
reasons. First, DBS line-of-sight problems are
60
63
significant (unless an entire MDU is connected to the service) because a DBS
antenna must be pointed in the proper direction to receive video programming
from the satellite. In addition, most MDU owners prohibit the placement of
individual antennas on their property by MDU residents. More importantly, DBS
operators are generally not permitted to retransmit network or local
broadcasting programming. Certain DBS operators have announced "MDU programs"
which generally consist of either (i) paying commissions to a local satellite
dish dealer who has, at its own expense, overbuilt an MDU or (ii) billing MDU
owners for the service on a bulk basis. The Company's Rights of Entry currently
prohibit an MDU owner from allowing a DBS system to be installed at the MDU.
Internet Services. The market for Internet access services is extremely
competitive and highly fragmented. No significant barriers to entry exist, and
competition in this market is expected to intensify as use of the Internet
grows. The Company competes (or in the future may compete) directly or
indirectly with (i) national and regional ISPs, (ii) national telecommunications
companies, (iii) LECs, (iv) cable operators and (v) nonprofit or educational
ISPs. Some of these present or potential future competitors have or can be
expected to have substantially greater market presence and financial, technical,
marketing and other resources than the Company. Certain of the Company's online
competitors have introduced unlimited access to the Internet and their
proprietary content at flat rates, and certain of the LECs have also introduced
competitive flat-rate pricing for unlimited access (without a set-up fee for at
least some period of time). There can be no assurance that competition will not
lead to pricing pressures in the Internet business.
Advances in communications technology as well as changes in the marketplace
and the regulatory and legislative environment are constantly occurring. In
addition, a continuing trend towards business combinations and alliances in the
communications industry may also create significant new competitors to OpTel.
The Company cannot predict whether competition from such developing and future
technologies or from such future competitors will have a material impact on its
operations. See "Risk Factors -- Competition."
REGULATION
The telecommunications and multichannel television industries are subject
to extensive regulation at the federal, state and local levels. The following
summary does not purport to describe all present and proposed federal, state and
local regulations and legislation relating to the telecommunications and
multichannel television industries. Legislative and regulatory proposals under
consideration from time to time by Congress and various federal agencies, as
well as state and local franchise requirements, have in the past, and may in the
future, materially affect the Company and the telecommunications and
multichannel television industries. Additionally, many aspects of regulation at
the federal, state and local levels currently are subject to judicial review or
are the subject of administrative or legislative proposals to modify, repeal or
adopt new laws and administrative regulations and policies. Neither the outcome
of these proceedings nor their impact on the Company can be predicted at this
time. The Company believes that it is in compliance in all material respects
with all federal, state and local regulations applicable to it. In some
instances, the Company has acquired businesses that did not comply with all
regulations applicable to them and it undertook to remediate such matters as
soon as practicable. See "Risk Factors -- Risks Associated with Acquisitions."
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996
The Telecom Act, which amended the Communications Act of 1933 (as amended,
the "Communications Act"), has altered, and will continue to alter, federal,
state and local laws and regulations regarding telecommunications providers and
services. The law is intended, in part, to promote competition in the
marketplace for local telephone service and in the delivery of video and other
services. Although the Company believes that certain provisions of the Telecom
Act will help the Company compete with ILECs and with franchised cable
operators, it is not possible at this time to predict the effect of the Telecom
Act on the telecommunications and multichannel television industries in general
or the Company in particular. In large part, the impact of the Telecom Act will
depend upon the outcome of various FCC rulemaking proceedings to interpret and
implement the Telecom Act.
61
64
TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATION
The telecommunications services provided by the Company are subject to
regulation by federal, state and local government agencies. As the Company
implements its telecommunications strategy, which includes replacing many of its
current PBX switches with networked central office switches, the Company will
increasingly become regulated as a CLEC. The FCC has jurisdiction over
interstate services, and state regulatory commissions exercise jurisdiction over
intrastate services. Additionally, local authorities may regulate limited
aspects of the Company's business, such as the use of public rights-of-way. The
following subsections summarize the local, state and federal regulations that
pertain to the Company's current and projected telecommunications services.
Competitive Local Exchange Carrier Regulation
Recent and impending changes in federal law and regulation likely will
affect the conduct of the Company's telecommunication service business. The FCC
historically has left the regulation of the intrastate aspects of local exchange
service to the states. It has, however, exercised its jurisdiction over
interstate matters and jurisdictionally mixed matters respecting local telephone
service. The Telecom Act expands the FCC's authority to regulate local exchange
service, and there can be no assurance that the FCC will not exercise this
authority aggressively.
State regulation of local exchange service traditionally has favored the
ILECs. The state laws have, with the exception of STS, generally prohibited
competition in the local exchange services market. The Telecom Act expressly
preempts such prohibitions. The Telecom Act declares that no state or local laws
or regulations may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the ability of any
entity to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service.
States may, however, impose "competitively neutral" requirements regarding
universal service, public safety and welfare, service quality and consumer
protection. Local authorities may also require reasonable, competitively neutral
compensation for use of the public rights-of-way.
The Company anticipates that it will, in the future, increasingly compete
in telecommunications markets as a CLEC. For purposes of the Telecom Act, CLECs
and ILECs are subject to the same basic set of requirements. However, certain
additional obligations are imposed on ILECs, but not on CLECs. Although the
Company does not believe that the regulatory burdens applicable to CLECs will
have a material effect on its business, no assurance can be given at this time
regarding the extent or impact of such regulation.
The Telecom Act requires all carriers, both CLECs and ILECs, to
interconnect with the facilities of other carriers, to resell their services, to
provide number portability, to provide dialing parity, to afford access to their
poles, ducts, conduits and rights-of-way and to establish reciprocal
compensation for the transport and termination of other LECs' telephone traffic.
All providers of telecommunications services are also subject to the Telecom
Act's requirements that they contribute to state and federal universal service
funds. ILECs are subject to certain additional requirements, such as a duty to
negotiate interconnection agreements in good faith, to unbundle elements of
their networks, to provide nondiscriminatory interconnection with their
networks, to comply with specific resale obligations, to provide notice of
changes to their networks and to allow collocation of other carriers' equipment
on their premises. The Company is not, however, considered an ILEC in any state.
The FCC and various state PUCs are in the process of defining the precise
contours of the requirements that will govern local exchange service in the
future. Although the Telecom Act sets forth certain standards, it also
authorizes the states to adopt additional regulations provided that such
regulations do not conflict with the federal standards. It is unclear at this
time how the states will respond to the Telecom Act and what additional
regulations they may adopt. Moreover, the United States Court of Appeals for the
Eighth Circuit overturned portions of the FCC's First Report and Order that had
set forth pricing methodologies for unbundling, resale and interconnection, and
that had also set forth certain technical requirements, such as obligations
relating to quality of service and combination of unbundled network elements.
The Supreme Court has granted certiorari and agreed to review the Eighth Circuit
decision. Further, a U.S. District Court has held unconstitutional certain
provisions of the Telecom Act that limit the ability of the RBOCs to provide
in-region long-distance telecommunications services. This decision has been
stayed pending appeal. Absent these restrictions, the
62
65
RBOCs may have less incentive to cooperate with CLECs seeking to enter local
exchange markets. The Company cannot predict the outcome of this litigation or
the impact of any court decision on the Company's operations.
It is not possible for the Company to predict the outcome of these or any
other proceedings relating to the Telecom Act. Nonetheless, at this time it is
clear that an increasing number of service providers will be seeking to compete
as CLECs in the local exchange markets and that state and federal regulations
will, to some extent, allow for such market entry. Although jurisdictional lines
of authority and basic implementation issues are being determined by the FCC and
the federal courts in accordance with the statutory provisions outlined above,
several states already have begun the process of opening the local exchange
market to competition.
Most states require companies seeking to compete in intrastate
telecommunications services to be certified to provide such services. These
certifications generally require a showing that the carrier has the financial,
managerial and technical resources to offer the proposed services consistent
with the public interest. State regulation of telecommunications services may
impose upon the Company additional regulatory burdens, including quality of
service obligations and universal service contributions.
Shared Tenant Services
The resale of STS is subject to the terms and conditions in the tariffs of
the telecommunications company whose services it resells and to regulation by
the states in which the Company resells such services. Historically, virtually
all such telecommunications company tariffs flatly prohibited resale of local
exchange service. However, in recent years several state legislatures and PUCs
determined that resale of local exchange service is in the public interest and
have directed telecommunications companies within their jurisdictions to allow
for resale of local exchange service, opening the way for STS operations.
Moreover, the Telecom Act requires such resale pursuant to interconnection
agreements with the ILEC. In some states, PUCs have issued detailed regulations
governing the provision of STS and other resale services. In other jurisdictions
where no formal requirements have been adopted, most telecommunications
companies have nonetheless modified their tariffs to provide for resale of local
exchange services.
The precise terms and conditions under which such resale services may be
provided varies from state to state, and from LEC to LEC, and may include
significant restrictions and limitations. These include: (i) a requirement to be
certified by the state PUC, (ii) restrictions with respect to the location and
ownership of MDUs to which STS service may be provided and the crossing of
public rights-of-way by STS operator facilities, (iii) regulations allowing
telecommunications companies to apply different local service rate structures
(e.g., measured use vs. flat rate) to STS providers and other subscribers, in
some cases lessening or even eliminating efficiencies which might otherwise be
realized through the use of the LECs' trunking facilities, (iv) regulations
providing for LEC access or rights-of-way to directly service individual
customers within an MDU and (v) in certain states, limits or prohibitions on
resale of intrastate long distance and local service at a profit.
None of the states in which the Company has significant operations has
adopted regulations governing the provision of STS services. The California PUC
has, however, adopted informal STS "guidelines." In addition, Florida requires
providers of STS services to be certified to resell local exchange services.
Other than the California "guidelines" and Florida's certification requirement,
the Company may provide STS services in each of its major markets, subject only
to individual telecommunications company tariff provisions. The tariffs of all
major LECs serving these jurisdictions provide for resale of local exchange
service pursuant to varying terms and conditions. Provision of STS service in
these states in the future will be subject to any regulations that ultimately
may be adopted by state authorities, and to changes in telephone company
tariffs.
Information Service Provider Regulation
Information service providers, including Internet access providers, are
largely unregulated at this time (apart from federal, state and local laws and
regulations applicable to business in general). However, there can be no
assurance that this business will not become subject to regulatory restraints.
For instance, although the
63
66
FCC has rejected proposals to impose additional costs and regulations on
information service providers to the extent they use local exchange telephone
network facilities, it has suggested that certain telephone-to-telephone
services provided by information service providers using the Internet backbone
may be reclassified as "telecommunications services" and subject to regulation
as such. Any such change may affect demand for the Company's Internet related
services. In addition, the FCC has pending a proceeding in which it will
determine whether CLECs that serve as information service providers are entitled
to reciprocal compensation from other LECs for terminating Internet traffic that
originates on the other LEC's network. An FCC determination that information
service provider traffic should not be included within reciprocal compensation
calculations could have a negative effect on the Company's revenues.
There also have been efforts at the federal and state level to impose taxes
and other burdens on information service providers and to regulate content
provided via the Internet and other information services. These efforts have not
generally been upheld when challenged in court. Nonetheless, the Company expects
that proposals of this nature will continue to be debated in Congress and state
legislatures in the future. No assurance can be given that changes in current or
future regulations adopted by the FCC or state regulators or other legislative
or judicial initiatives relating to Internet services would not have a material
adverse effect on OpTel. In addition, although there is a trend in the law away
from ISP liability for content posted or published on the Internet, there can be
no assurance that the Company's involvement in the provision of ISP services
will not subject it to liability for acts performed by third parties using the
Internet.
Long Distance Resale Regulation
Non-dominant IXCs, such as the Company, are subject to limited federal
regulation. Nonetheless, carriers are required by statute to offer their
services under rates, terms and conditions that are just, reasonable and not
unreasonably discriminatory, and to file tariffs for their international and
interexchange services. As a non-dominant carrier, the Company is permitted to
make tariff filings on a single day's notice and without cost support to justify
specific rates. The FCC generally does not exercise direct oversight over cost
justification and the level of charges for service of non-dominant carriers,
although it has the statutory power to do so. The FCC has jurisdiction to act
upon complaints brought by third parties, or on the FCC's own motion, against a
carrier for failure to comply with its statutory obligations.
Foreign Ownership Restrictions
Section 310(b) of the Communications Act limits the extent to which foreign
controlled companies may hold common carrier radio licenses. Under Section
310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, the FCC has discretion to permit common
carrier licensees to exceed some of these limits. To allow the Company to
provide common carrier telecommunications services using its networks, in the
event that the Company should desire to do so, the Company assigned
substantially all of its frequency licenses (the "Assigned Licenses") to THI, an
entity owned by United States citizens. To establish the terms of the Company's
continued and unencumbered use of the Assigned Licenses, the Company entered
into a license and services agreement pursuant to which THI agreed to provide to
the Company all the transmission capacity it requires or may in the future
require and the Company granted THI a non-exclusive license to use all of the
Company's facilities and related equipment, such as microwave transmitting and
receiving equipment, required to provide transmission capacity. The Company also
obtained an option to acquire the assets or equity of THI, subject to FCC
approval.
In 1997, the United States agreed, as part of the WTO Basic Telecom
Agreement, to allow foreign suppliers from WTO member nations, including Canada,
to provide a broad range of basic telecommunications services in the United
States. In light of those commitments, which became effective in February 1998,
and consistent with its authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications
Act, the FCC adopted a presumption favoring grant of applications to exceed the
limits on non-U.S. ownership of common carrier licensees when the non-U.S.
investment is from a WTO member nation. Accordingly, the Company is in the
process of reevaluating whether it should hold FCC authorizations directly and,
specifically, whether it should exercise its option to purchase the assets or
stock of THI.
64
67
REGULATION OF CABLE TELEVISION
Certain of the Company's networks are, for regulatory purposes, deemed to
be "Cable Systems." To constitute a Cable System, a multichannel television
system must use hard-wire or fiber optic cable that makes a tangible physical
crossing or use of a public right-of-way. All Cable Systems are required to
obtain a local franchise and are subject to state and local regulation as well
as federal Cable System regulation, including rate regulation in certain
circumstances. The Company's 18GHz networks, its 12GHz networks to be developed
and SMATV systems are not considered Cable Systems and thus are not subject to
local franchising requirements and are free from most Cable System regulation.
The Company's Houston system, a portion of its Fort Worth system and certain
other small systems are regulated as Cable Systems. However, the Company's
Houston, Fort Worth and other small franchise cable television systems are
exempt from federal rate regulation and the universal service obligation, even
though they are Cable Systems, because they are subject to "effective
competition" as discussed in greater detail below.
Set forth below is a discussion of the principal laws and regulations
governing the Company's private and franchise cable television operations.
Federal "Cable System" Regulation. The Communications Act governs the
regulation of Cable Systems. The regulations imposed on Cable Systems include
requirements to (i) obtain a local franchise (which may require the franchisee
to pay franchise fees to local governments of up to 5% of yearly gross
revenues), (ii) delete certain programs from cablecasts, (iii) comply with
certain customer service standards, (iv) retransmit certain broadcast television
programming, (v) in most circumstances, conform subscriber service and equipment
rates to applicable federal regulations, (vi) comply with FCC equal employment
opportunity ("EEO") rules and policies, (vii) make available channels for
leased-access programmers at rates that are to be calculated on a formula
established by the FCC and (viii) offer customer service to all buildings passed
by its network. In addition, rates for basic cable service on Cable Systems not
subject to "effective competition" are regulated by local franchising
authorities. Rates for upper tier or "cable programming services" on such
systems are regulated by the FCC. The Telecom Act eliminates cable programming
service tier rate regulation effective March 31, 1999, for all Cable System
operators. The Company's networks that are Cable Systems are subject to these
requirements, which impose regulatory costs and reduce the speed and flexibility
with which the Company and its Cable System competitors can respond to
competitive challenges from other video distribution technologies. The Company's
Cable Systems, however, are exempt from rate regulation because they are, the
Company believes, subject to "effective competition."
Prior to the enactment of the Telecom Act, Cable Systems were deemed to be
subject to "effective competition" if any of: (i) fewer than 30% of the
households in the franchise area subscribe to the service of the Cable System,
(ii) the area is served by at least two unaffiliated multichannel television
operators, both of which are able to provide service to at least 50% of the
households in the franchise area, and the number of households actually
subscribing to all but the largest multichannel television operator exceeds 15%
or (iii) the local franchising authority itself offers multichannel television
to at least 50% of the households in the franchise area. The Telecom Act
expanded the definition of "effective competition" to include situations in
which a LEC or its affiliate offers multichannel television directly to
subscribers by any means (other than direct-to-home satellite services) in the
franchise area. It is expected that this change will provide franchise cable
television operators with increased pricing flexibility to the extent that LECs
begin to provide multichannel television services. No assurance can be given
that the Company does not, or will not in the future, constitute "effective
competition" to any franchise cable television operator with which it competes.
Copyright Licensing. Cable Systems and private cable television systems are
entitled to federal compulsory copyright licensing privileges. In order to
obtain a compulsory copyright, such systems must make semi-annual payments to a
copyright royalty pool administered by the Library of Congress. A compulsory
copyright provides a blanket license to retransmit the programming carried on
television broadcast stations. Non-broadcast programming, often referred to as
cable channel programming, is not subject to the compulsory copyright license.
The Company purchases this copyrighted programming from program suppliers (e.g.,
ESPN), which in turn obtain rights to the programming directly from the program
copyright owner pursuant to a private negotiated agreement. Bills have been
introduced in Congress over the past several years
65
68
that would eliminate or modify the cable compulsory license. The need to
negotiate with the copyright owners for each program carried on each broadcast
station in the channel lineup could increase the cost of carrying broadcast
signals or could impair the Company's ability to obtain programming.
Must-Carry and Retransmission Consent. The Communications Act grants local
television stations the right to elect either to force local Cable Systems to
"carry" the television station free of charge (a "must carry" right) or to
prohibit Cable Systems and private cable television systems from carrying the
local television station (a "retransmission consent" right). Under the
must-carry rules, a Cable System, subject to certain restrictions, generally
must carry, upon request by the station and depending on the number of usable
activated channels on the system, all commercial television stations with
adequate signals that are licensed to the same market as the Cable System. Under
the retransmission consent rules, Cable Systems and private cable television
systems are precluded from carrying commercial broadcast stations that choose
not to exercise their must-carry rights, all "distant" commercial broadcast
stations (except for "superstations", i.e., commercial satellite-delivered
independent stations such as WTBS), commercial radio stations and certain low-
powered television stations, without obtaining those stations' explicit written
consent for the retransmission of their programming. Retransmission consent
agreements do not obviate a copyright license for the programming carried on the
broadcaster's signal. However, Cable Systems and private cable television
systems may obtain a compulsory copyright license for broadcast programming as
described above. To date, the "must carry/retransmission consent" regulations
have not had a significant impact on either the operations or profitability of
the Company. The Company has had little difficulty obtaining retransmission
consent agreements with local broadcasters. Nonetheless, there can be no
assurance that broadcasters, in some circumstances, will not withhold
retransmission consent, require excessive compensation for that consent or
impose onerous conditions thereon which could adversely affect the Company.
Furthermore, it is unclear at this time the extent to which Cable Systems will
be required to carry multiple signals of digital television broadcast stations
or high definition television ("HDTV") signals. The resolution of these
must-carry issues may have a significant impact on the programming carried on
the Company's systems.
Changes in the Definition of a "Cable System." Formerly, to avoid being
classified as a Cable System, private cable television systems were limited to
linking with hard wire only commonly owned or managed MDUs without crossing a
public right-of-way. The Telecom Act amended the definition of Cable System such
that systems which make no use of public streets or public rights-of-way no
longer are deemed to be Cable Systems, regardless of the type or ownership of
properties served by the system. Thus, for example, the Company's private cable
television systems now may serve mobile home parks and private communities
without a local franchise and free of most federal Cable System regulations.
Elimination of the Telco-Cable Cross-Ownership Restriction. The Telecom Act
repealed the LEC cable television cross-ownership restriction, which prohibited
LECs from providing multichannel television directly to subscribers in their
telephone service areas. This change may increase the level of competition in
the multichannel television market. LECs now have several options for entering
and competing in the multichannel television marketplace. LECs now may (i)
provide video programming to subscribers through radio communications under
Title III of the Communications Act, (ii) provide transmission of video
programming on a common carrier basis under Title II of the Communications Act
(i.e., provide a common carrier video platform), (iii) provide video programming
as a Cable System under Title VI of the Communications Act (franchise cable) and
(iv) provide video programming by means of an "open video system." Open video
systems are not required to comply with the full panoply of federal Cable System
regulation, but they are subject to certain additional programming selection
limitations. It is unclear at this time the extent to which any of these market
entry options will be used by LECs.
Rate Relief for Small Cable Operators. The Telecom Act deregulated the
rates charged for cable programming services in any Cable System operated by a
"small cable operator" that serves 50,000 or fewer subscribers. The law defines
a "small cable operator" as one which, in the aggregate, serves fewer than one
percent of all subscribers in the United States and which is not affiliated with
any entity with gross annual revenues in excess of $250 million. This provision
may provide increased pricing flexibility for certain of the Company's
competitors who qualify as "small cable operators."
66
69
The Uniform Rate Requirement. Prior to enactment of the Telecom Act, the
Communications Act generally provided that Cable Systems were required to have a
rate structure for the provision of cable service that was uniform throughout
its geographic area. The Telecom Act provides that this requirement is
applicable only where "effective competition" is absent. Further, the Telecom
Act exempts from the uniform rate requirement non-predatory bulk discounts
offered to MDUs. Consequently, the franchise cable television operators with
which the Company competes now have increased pricing flexibility with respect
to MDU bulk discounts.
Program Access. The program access provisions of the Communications Act
were intended to eliminate unfair competitive practices and facilitate
competition by providing competitive access to certain defined categories of
programming. Generally, these restrictions are applicable to Cable System
operators, satellite cable programming vendors in which a Cable System operator
has an attributable interest and satellite broadcast programming vendors. The
programming access provisions prohibit these entities from charging unfair,
unreasonable or discriminatory prices for programming. Further, the programming
access provisions prohibit most exclusive dealing arrangements pursuant to which
Cable Systems obtain the exclusive right to distribute the subject programming
within their franchise areas. Such exclusive distribution arrangements have been
found to inhibit the ability of new entrants to compete in the multichannel
television market. The prohibition on exclusive contracts, however, is scheduled
to expire on October 5, 2002 unless the FCC determines, during a proceeding that
is to be conducted in 2001, that the prohibition continues to be necessary to
promote competition in the multichannel television market. The Telecom Act
amended the program access provisions by adding that the provisions shall also
apply to common carriers and their affiliates. Thus, telecommunications
companies entering the market will find it more difficult to limit their
competitors' access to programming.
Subscriber Access. The FCC has initiated a notice of proposed rulemaking
seeking comment on whether the FCC should adopt regulations restricting
exclusive contracts. The FCC has indicated that it seeks to ensure a level
competitive playing field in the emerging multichannel television market. One
possibility raised by the FCC is the establishment of a federal mandatory access
requirement or a limit on the duration of exclusive service agreements between
MDU owners and video programming providers. In another proceeding, the FCC is
contemplating an order preempting state, local and private restrictions on
over-the-air reception antennas placed on rental properties or properties not
within the exclusive control of the viewer. Although it is open to question
whether the FCC has statutory and constitutional authority to compel mandatory
access, restrict exclusive agreements or preempt private restrictions on
antennas located on property owned or controlled by others, there can be no
assurance that it will not attempt to do so. Either such action would tend to
undermine the exclusivity provisions of the Company's Rights of Entry with MDU
owners.
State and Local Cable System Regulation. Because Cable Systems use public
rights-of-way, they are subject to state and local regulation, typically imposed
through the franchising process. State and/or local officials often are involved
in the franchisee selection, system design and construction, safety, consumer
relations, billing and community-related programming and services among other
matters. Cable Systems generally are operated pursuant to nonexclusive
franchises, permits or licenses granted by a municipality or other state or
local government entity. Franchises generally are granted for fixed terms and in
many cases are terminable if the franchise operator fails to comply with
material provisions of the franchise. Franchising authorities are immune from
monetary damage awards arising out of regulation of Cable Systems or decisions
made on franchise grants, renewals, transfers and amendments.
Cable franchises typically contain provisions governing fees to be paid to
the franchising authority, length of the franchise term, renewal, sale or
transfer of the franchise, territory of the franchise, design and technical
performance of the system, use and occupancy of public rights-of-way and types
of cable services provided.
Although federal law contains certain procedural safeguards to protect
incumbent Cable Systems from arbitrary denials of franchise renewal, the renewal
of a cable franchise cannot be assured unless the franchisee has met certain
statutory standards. Moreover, even if a franchise is renewed, a franchising
authority may impose new requirements, such as the upgrading of facilities and
equipment or higher franchise fees. At least two states, Massachusetts and
Connecticut, have adopted legislation subjecting Cable Systems to regulation
67
70
by a centralized state government agency. There can be no assurance that other
states will not similarly adopt state level regulation.
The Company's Houston cable television franchise and its other limited
cable television franchises are subject to state and local franchise laws.
Moreover, although the Company's non-franchised private cable systems that use
microwave distribution technologies are not subject to local franchise laws,
state and local property tax and environmental laws are applicable to the
Company's business. For example, the Company has to comply with local zoning
laws and applicable covenants, conditions and restrictions when installing its
antennae and other microwave equipment.
In addition, a number of states have enacted mandatory access laws.
Although such laws differ in some respects from state to state, state mandatory
access laws generally require that, in exchange for just compensation (typically
set by statute or regulation to be as low as $1.00), the owners of rental
apartments (and, in some instances, the owners of condominiums and manufactured
housing parks) must allow the local franchise cable television operator to have
access to the property to install its equipment and provide cable service to
residents of the MDU. Such state mandatory access laws effectively eliminate the
ability of the property owner to enter into an exclusive Right of Entry with a
provider of cable or other video programming services. To the best of the
Company's knowledge, states that have enacted cable mandatory access statutes in
some form are: Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Minnesota,
Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Wisconsin. The
District of Columbia and the cities of Scottsdale and Glendale, Arizona, and
Lewisville, Texas also have adopted municipal ordinances requiring mandatory
access. Florida currently has a mandatory access statute for condominiums, but
the validity of that statute has been called into question because an identical
provision of Florida law that applied to rental properties has been held to be
unconstitutional. Virginia has an anti-compensation statute that forbids an
owner of an MDU from accepting compensation from whomever the owner permits to
provide cable or other video programming services to the property. Such a
statute limits the ability of a cable or other video programming provider to
enter into an exclusive Right of Entry with an owner of an MDU because an owner
usually is induced to enter an exclusive agreement through financial incentives.
These statutes have been and are being challenged on constitutional grounds in
various states.
The Company does not have significant operations in any mandatory access
state other than Florida (with respect to condominiums) and Illinois. When
operating in Illinois, the Company generally enters into bulk sales agreements
with MDU owners, whereby the MDU owner agrees to purchase cable television, at a
discount, for each unit in the MDU and provides the service to the MDU resident
as one of the amenities included in their rent.
MICROWAVE AND PRIVATE CABLE REGULATION
The Company uses microwave distribution networks, which typically operate
in the 18GHz band, to interconnect individual private cable systems with each
other and with head-end facilities. The FCC exercises jurisdiction over 18GHz
microwave and other transport technologies using the radio frequency spectrum
pursuant to Title III of the Communications Act, which vests authority in the
FCC to regulate radio transmissions and to issue licenses for radio stations.
The scope, content and meaning of existing laws, rules and regulations governing
all microwave technologies are subject to legislative, judicial and
administrative changes. There can be no assurance that future legislative or
regulatory actions will not adversely affect the Company's ability to deliver
video or telecommunications programming using the radio frequency spectrum or
raise the cost of such delivery.
The Company's microwave networks must comply with the FCC's licensing
procedures and rules governing a licensee's operations. Application to use
microwave "paths" and frequencies is made to the FCC and is subject to certain
technical requirements and eligibility qualifications. After microwave paths are
licensed to an applicant, the facilities must normally be constructed and fully
operational within 18 months of the grant. The facilities must be built in
strict accordance with the terms of the granted application. Most of the
Company's licenses are valid for a period of five years from the grant date.
However, new licenses are valid for ten years from the date of grant, after
which the licensee must apply to the FCC for license renewal.
68
71
License renewal is not an automatic right, although it is routinely granted if
the licensee is in substantial compliance with the FCC rules.
Licensing procedures include (i) obtaining an engineering report confirming
that the proposed path does not interfere with existing paths and (ii) filing
with the FCC a statement of eligibility and use, a system diagram and a
statement regarding compliance with the frequency coordination requirement. The
entire licensing procedure requires approximately 120 days.
The Company does not "own" the paths and frequencies granted by the FCC.
Rather, the Company is merely licensed or permitted to "use" the frequencies.
Moreover, the rights granted to the Company to use microwave frequencies are not
to the complete exclusion of other potential licensees. First, the Company's
rights only extend to the microwave paths identified in its application as
connecting the various points in its network. Other microwave users are
permitted to file applications and serve the same buildings as the Company (in
so far as the microwave licensing is concerned), but they may not interfere with
an incumbent user's licensed microwave paths. Second, the Company has no right
to the airspace over which the programming is transmitted. Obstructions could be
constructed in the line-of-sight of the microwave paths, precluding connection
of the Network Hubs with the various reception points to be served. The
microwave bands used by the Company also are authorized for use by other kinds
of users, including non-video, point-to-point microwave, mobile communications
and satellite transmissions. Although sharing these frequencies is technically
feasible, it is possible that the Company will be unable to obtain licenses for
frequency paths it desires, or that it will be able to use only a portion of the
frequencies at certain locations because of pre-existing users. In addition,
there have been proposals by certain satellite operators to blanket license
satellite downlink transmissions in the 18GHz band. If adopted, such blanket
licensing could impair the use of the 18GHz band by private microwave operators
such as the Company.
The Company anticipates that in the future it will use 6GHz, 11GHz and
23GHz microwave frequencies, which are available for both private or common
carrier communications, to provide bi-directional telecommunications services.
The application and licensing procedures for authorizations to use the 6GHz,
11GHz and 23GHz frequencies are substantially the same as those described above.
Although the Company expects that 6GHz, 11GHz and 23GHz frequencies will be
available on its current paths and to meet its future needs, the Company has not
commenced frequency coordination, and there can be no assurance that the Company
will be able to obtain licenses for these frequencies on the paths it desires.
Recently the FCC, at the request of national defense agencies, restricted
the use of 18GHz frequencies in the greater Denver and Washington, D.C. areas.
This change could severely limit the Company's ability to use 18GHz microwave
technologies in these two markets. The Company has, however, received assurances
from the FCC that it will be permitted, subject to certain waiver and/or
rulemaking procedures, to use 12GHz microwave as a medium to deliver
multi-channel video programming and telecommunications services in Denver. The
Company believes that 12GHz microwave paths are an acceptable substitute for
18GHz microwave paths and that the change will not materially adversely affect
the Company's network plans in Denver. The 12GHz frequencies are not, however,
generally available to private microwave licensees. Nonetheless, based on the
assurances received from the FCC, the Company has commenced frequency
coordinations for 12GHz paths in Denver and obtained special temporary
authorization to use 12GHz frequencies on selected paths in Denver. There can be
no assurance that 12GHz paths will be available for the Company's future needs
in Denver or the Washington, D.C. area.
To reduce the Company's reliance on 18GHz microwave and to take advantage
of superior propagation characteristics of lower frequency microwave
transmissions, the Company has initiated two proceedings at the FCC that would,
if resolved in a manner satisfactory to the Company, make additional microwave
bands available for use by the Company on a nationwide basis. First, the Company
has filed a petition for rulemaking that proposes FCC rule changes to allow the
Company and other private microwave licensees to use 12GHz frequencies
nationwide for the delivery of video programming materials. These bands, which
the Company has obtained limited authority to use in the Denver market, normally
are not available for video distribution services by private microwave
licensees. Second, the Company has sought a nationwide waiver of a restriction
in the FCC's rules that prohibits non-common carrier microwave licensees from
transmitting video entertain-
69
72
ment material in the 11GHz microwave bands. Although the Company anticipates
that one or both of these regulatory initiatives will be successful, there can
be no assurance that either of these bands will be made generally available to
the Company on a nationwide basis.
Radio frequency ("RF") emissions from microwave equipment may pose health
risks to humans. The FCC recently adopted new guidelines and methods for
evaluating the environmental effects of RF emissions from FCC-regulated
transmitters, including microwave equipment. The updated guidelines and methods
generally are more stringent than those previously in effect. The Company
expects that the microwave equipment to be provided by its vendors will comply
with applicable FCC guidelines.
Although private cable television operators are not subject to the full
range of regulation applicable to Cable Systems, they are subject to the
following federal regulations. First, private cable television operators are
entitled to the compulsory copyright license described above. Second, private
cable television operators benefit from the federal laws and regulations that
require certain programming providers to make cable programming available to all
multichannel video programming distributors on fair, reasonable and
nondiscriminatory terms. Third, as noted above, private cable television
operators are required to obtain retransmission consent from local broadcasters
in order to retransmit their signals. Finally, private cable television systems
are required to comply with the FCC's EEO rules and policies, although the
continuing validity of these rules and policies has been called into question by
a recent court of appeals decision overturning portions of the FCC's EEO rules
applicable to broadcast stations.
Because they are subject to minimal federal regulation, private cable
television operators have significantly more competitive flexibility than do the
franchised Cable Systems with which they compete. Private cable television
operators have fewer programming restrictions, greater pricing freedom and they
are not required to serve any customer who they do not choose to serve. In
addition, with the exception of local zoning laws and regulations, state and
local authorities generally have no jurisdiction over private cable television
operators. The Company believes that these advantages help to make its private
cable television systems competitive with larger franchised Cable Systems.
EMPLOYEES
As of May 31, 1998, the Company had a total of 597 full-time employees. The
Company believes that its continued success will depend in large part on its
ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel. The
Company has nondisclosure agreements with all of its senior executive officers.
From time to time, the Company also uses the services of contract technicians
for installation and maintenance services. The Company relies principally on
outside contractors for network construction. None of the Company's employees is
currently represented by a collective bargaining agreement. The Company believes
that its relationships with its employees are good.
PROPERTIES
The Company's executive offices are located in Dallas, Texas and house its
national call center and its corporate, engineering, sales and marketing and
corporate administrative services groups. The original lease provides for
approximately 52,000 square feet of space and has a ten-year term expiring
November 30, 2005. The Company has an option to extend the lease term for an
additional five-year term at the then market rental rate. The Company recently
leased an additional 17,000 square feet in the same building, for a term of one
year, to provide for needed expansion. The Company pays approximately $71,000
per month for the space in its headquarters building. The Company has the right
to acquire additional space at its current location when such space becomes
available. In light of the Company's rapid growth, the Company is currently
evaluating relocating its executive offices to a new location within the
Dallas-Fort Worth area.
In October 1997, the Company purchased a building proximate to its
executive offices in Dallas, Texas. The Company has installed the central office
switch for the Dallas-Fort Worth market in the building and intends to relocate
its Dallas regional operations to the same building by the end of calendar 1998.
The Company also leases facilities in each of the fourteen cities in which it
has established regional operations.
70
73
The Company owns substantially all of the telecommunications and cable
television equipment essential to its operations. The Company's major fixed
assets are telecommunications switches, cable television head ends, microwave
transmitters and receivers, SMATV receivers, PBX switches and coaxial fiber
optic cable. Such properties do not lend themselves to description by character
and location of principal units. Substantially all of this equipment (other than
fiber optic cable laid under public rights of way) resides on or under the MDUs
served by the Company or in leased facilities in various locations throughout
the metropolitan areas served by the Company.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is not a party to any legal proceedings except for those
described below and those arising in the ordinary course of business. The
Company does not believe that any legal proceeding to which it is a party will
have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial condition or results
of operations.
On April 27, 1998, the Civil Action was commenced against the Company in
the United States District Court for the Northern District of California by
Octel, charging the Company with trademark infringement, trade name
infringement, trademark dilution and unfair competition based on its use of the
name "OpTel" and seeking to enjoin the Company from using the name "OpTel." The
Civil Action follows a now-suspended administrative proceeding in the PTO,
pending since November 7, 1995, relating to registration of the "OpTel" mark by
the Company. The PTO found the Company's application for registration to be
allowable; however, Octel commenced the PTO proceeding claiming that the
Company's mark is confusingly similar to the "Octel" mark used by that party in
a related field, and claiming that the Company's application had procedural
deficiencies. During the course of the PTO proceeding, the Company acquired
rights to the marks "Optel" and "Optel Communications" in the telecommunications
field which are believed to predate the rights of Octel to its trademark, and
the Company commenced two further proceedings against Octel in the PTO seeking
cancellation of two of the trademark registrations owned by Octel. The various
proceedings in the PTO between the Company and Octel were consolidated and
thereafter suspended on May 15, 1998, in view of the commencement of the Civil
Action. The Company believes it has meritorious counterclaims in the Civil
Action and intends to vigorously defend against Octel's claims. Although the
Company does not believe that its use of the name "OpTel" infringes on the
trademark or trade name rights of Octel or any other person, there can be no
assurance as to the outcome of the Civil Action or the proceedings in the PTO
(if reinstated) or that any such outcome would not materially adversely affect
the Company. See "Risk Factors -- Use of the Name OpTel."
On April 9, 1998, a purported class action complaint was filed in the
District Court of Harris County, Texas by Gavin Stewart Clarkson, individually
and on behalf of all cable subscribers in the U.S. that have paid late fees to
either Phonoscope or the Company. The plaintiff, who formerly subscribed to
cable television services provided by Phonoscope, alleges that Phonoscope's
charging pre-established late fees for delinquent payments of cable subscription
charges constitutes an illegal collection of a penalty and that cable service
providers should only be entitled to their actual collection costs. The
plaintiff seeks to enjoin Phonoscope and OpTel from collecting, or attempting to
collect, such late fees. The case is in its very early stages and no assurance
can be given as to its ultimate outcome or that any such outcome will not
materially adversely affect the Company. OpTel believes that it will have
meritorious factual and legal defenses and intends to defend vigorously against
these claims. See "Risk Factors -- Late Fees Class Action Litigation."
71
74
MANAGEMENT
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the directors
and executive officers of the Company as of July 31, 1998:
NAME POSITION AGE
- ---- -------- ---
Claude Chagnon................. Chairman of the Board and Director 43
Louis Brunel................... Director; President and Chief Executive Officer 57
Christian Chagnon.............. Director 42
William O. Hunt................ Director 65
Lynn McDonald.................. Director 38
Alain Michel................... Vice Chairman of the Board and Director 49
Bertrand Blanchette............ Chief Financial Officer 40
John Czapko.................... Vice President, Sales 56
Stephen Dube................... Vice President, Operations 42
James Greene................... Vice President, Telephone 52
Michael E. Katzenstein......... Vice President, Legal Affairs and General Counsel 39
Thomas Watson.................. Vice President, Engineering and Information Services 43
Lynn Zera...................... Vice President, Human Resources 50
Claude Chagnon has served as a Director since August 1996. Since October
1996, he has been the President and Chief Operating Officer of GVL. From January
1994 to October 1996, Mr. Chagnon was Vice Chairman of GVL. Prior to 1994, Mr.
Chagnon held various positions at GVL and its subsidiaries including, from May
1988 to January 1994, President of Videotron Ltee, a Canadian cable television
company and wholly-owned subsidiary of GVL.
Louis Brunel has served as a Director since March 1995 and as President and
Chief Executive Officer since April 1996. Since 1988, Mr. Brunel has held
various positions at GVL and its subsidiaries, including, immediately prior to
joining OpTel, Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Videotron Holdings
Plc ("VHP"), a recently divested United Kingdom based cable and telephone
subsidiary of GVL. While at VHP, Mr. Brunel was the chief architect of VHP's
cable television/telecommunications business. From 1988 to 1990, he served as
Vice President, Corporate Development of GVL. In addition, he served as
President of Videotron International Ltee from September 1994 through December
1996.
Christian Chagnon has served as a Director since March 1997 and has been
Senior Vice President, Strategic Planning and Technology of GVL since September
1994. Prior to August 1994, Mr. Chagnon was also President of Videotron Services
Informatiques Ltee. Mr. Chagnon also serves as a Director of GVL. Mr. Christian
Chagnon is the brother of Mr. Claude Chagnon.
William O. Hunt was appointed as a Director in June 1998. Since December
1992, Mr. Hunt has served as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
President of Intellicall, Inc. ("Intellicall"), a manufacturer of network and
customer premise equipment. From June 1986 to July 1992, Mr. Hunt was Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of Alliance Telecommunications Corporation, a
wireless telecommunications company. Mr. Hunt also serves as a Director of The
Allen Group Inc., American Homestar Corporation, DSC Communications Corporation
and Dr. Pepper Bottling Company of Texas.
Lynn McDonald was appointed as a Director in June 1998. Since 1996, Ms.
McDonald has been a Manager with CDPQ, a subsidiary of Caisse that actively
manages private placements in communications companies. Prior to joining CDPQ,
Ms. McDonald worked at the Fonds de Solidarite des Travailleurs du Quebec, a
leading venture capital fund. Previously, Ms. McDonald was a special situations
equity analyst at BBN James Capel, a Canadian stock brokerage firm. Ms. McDonald
is also a Director of Fundy Communications Inc., Telexis Corporation, Les
Systemes Proxima Ltee and Regional Vision Inc.
72
75
Alain Michel has served as a Director since April 1997. Since July 1992,
Mr. Michel has held various management positions at GVL, including, since July
1994, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Michel is also a
Director of NB Capital, Inc., a publicly traded Delaware real estate investment
trust, Microcell Telecommunications Inc., a Canadian public company which
provides telecommunications services and in which GVL holds a minority interest,
and Groupe Goyette Inc., a Canadian private company which provides
transportation and storage services.
Bertrand Blanchette was appointed Chief Financial Officer in September
1996. From September 1995 to December 1996, Mr. Blanchette served as Chief
Financial Officer of VHP. From June 1994 to December 1995, he was Vice
President, Control of GVL. From October 1986 to May 1994, Mr. Blanchette was
Vice President, Finance of Heroux, Inc., a Canadian public company which
manufactures airplane parts.
John Czapko was appointed Vice President, Sales in March 1997. From
September 1993 to February 1997, Mr. Czapko was Director of Indirect
Distribution of Metrocel Cellular Telephone Company ("Metrocel"). From June 1991
to September 1993, he was Director of Direct Distribution of Metrocel.
Stephen Dube was appointed Vice President, Operations in March 1998. Prior
to that date, Mr. Dube served as Vice President, Marketing and Corporate
Development for OpTel from May 1997 to March 1998 and as Vice President,
Acquisitions and Strategic Planning for OpTel from July 1995 to May 1997. From
July 1995 to March 1997, Mr. Dube served as a Director of OpTel. From January
1992 to April 1995, Mr. Dube was Senior Vice President of Laurentian Financial
Inc., a financial services company.
James Greene was appointed Vice President, Telephone in April 1998. From
June 1997 to April 1998, Mr. Greene was an independent consultant and advised
the Company on the launch of its first central office switch in Houston, Texas
and the commencement of CLEC services. Mr. Greene consulted for OpTel on an
exclusive basis from November 1997 until his appointment as Vice President. From
1993 to November 1997, Mr. Greene was a consultant for several state and local
regulatory bodies and worked principally with the State of Oregon.
Michael E. Katzenstein was appointed Vice President, Legal Affairs and
General Counsel in November 1995. Prior to joining OpTel, Mr. Katzenstein was a
partner at Kronish Lieb Weiner and Hellman LLP. Mr. Katzenstein received his
J.D. from Boston University School of Law in 1985.
Thomas Watson was appointed Vice President, Information Services in
September 1996. In August 1997, he also assumed the role of Vice President,
Engineering. From January 1992 to September 1996, Mr. Watson held various
positions at GTE Telephone Operations, an ILEC, including Group Product Manager,
Group Manager Engineering and Senior Program Manager.
Lynn Zera was appointed Vice President, Human Resources in November 1995.
From July 1994 to October 1995, Ms. Zera was Executive Director of Keystone
Consulting. From July 1993 to July 1994, she was Executive Director of Human
Resources of Intellicall. From March 1978 to January 1993, she held various
management and marketing positions with Oryx Energy, a company involved with the
production and exploration of oil and gas.
Pursuant to the Company's Bylaws, Directors are elected annually and serve
in such capacity until the earlier of their removal or resignation or the
election of their successors.
73
76
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth certain information concerning compensation
awarded to or paid to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and the four most
highly compensated executive officers (collectively, the "Named Executive
Officers") for the fiscal years ended August 31, 1997, 1996 and the eight month
period ended August 31, 1995.
ANNUAL COMPENSATION LONG-TERM COMPENSATION
------------------------------------ ------------------------------
SECURITIES
FISCAL OTHER ANNUAL UNDERLYING ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS COMPENSATION OPTIONS COMPENSATION(14)
--------------------------- ------ -------- ------- ------------ ---------- ----------------
Louis Brunel........................ 1997 $269,623 -- $ 66,062(7) 16,034.79 --
President and Chief 1996 $ 35,095(2) -- -- -- --
Executive Officer 1995 -- -- -- -- --
Michael E. Katzenstein.............. 1997 $175,000 $57,500 $ 65,196(8) 9,137.61 $2,820
Vice President, Legal Affairs 1996 $135,346(3) $40,000 $103,756(9) -- $3,334
and General Counsel 1995 -- -- -- -- --
Rory Cole(1)........................ 1997 $163,654 $43,750 -- 9,406.36(13) $3,629(15)
Vice President and 1996 $175,000 $36,500 -- -- $4,750
Chief Operating Officer 1995 $102,980 -- $ 22,405(10) -- --
Bertrand Blanchette................. 1997 $129,702(4) $ 5,000 $ 33,961(11) 4,373.12 --
Vice President and 1996 -- -- -- -- --
Chief Financial Officer 1995 -- -- -- -- --
Stephen Dube........................ 1997 $119,139 $15,000 $ 63,514(12) 3,381.88 $2,844
Vice President, Operations 1996 $ 36,542(5) -- -- -- --
1995 -- -- -- -- --
Lynn Zera........................... 1997 $112,877 $21,040 -- 2,565.57 $2,809
Vice President, Human Resources 1996 $ 83,750(6) -- -- -- $2,513
1995 -- -- -- -- --
- ---------------
(1) Mr. Cole resigned from the Company effective July 11, 1997.
(2) During fiscal 1996, Mr. Brunel was paid primarily by GVL. Beginning June 1,
1996, a portion of Mr. Brunel's salary was allocated to the Company.
Effective November 1, 1996, Mr. Brunel accepted the position of President
and Chief Executive Officer on a full-time basis.
(3) Mr. Katzenstein commenced employment with the Company in November 1995.
(4) Mr. Blanchette commenced employment with the Company as Chief Financial
Officer in September 1996. During the period September 1996 through
December 1996, Mr. Blanchette continued to act as Chief Financial Officer
of VHP, a subsidiary of GVL which was divested in December 1996. During
such period, Mr. Blanchette's salary was paid by VHP and a portion of such
salary was allocated to the Company. Mr. Blanchette commenced full-time
employment with the Company effective January 1, 1997.
(5) During fiscal 1996, Mr. Dube was paid primarily by GVL. Beginning June 1,
1996, a portion of Mr. Dube's salary was allocated to the Company.
Effective January 1, 1997, Mr. Dube became a full-time employee of the
Company.
(6) Ms. Zera commenced employment with the Company in November 1995.
(7) $39,790 represents relocation payments and $21,680 represents an automobile
allowance.
(8) $49,823 represents tax reimbursements resulting from relocation.
(9) $93,706 represents relocation payments.
(10) The entire amount represents relocation payments.
(11) $29,161 represents relocation payments.
(12) $54,288 represents relocation payments.
(13) In connection with the termination of Mr. Cole's employment, and in
exchange for cancellation of the options granted to Mr. Cole under the Plan
(as defined), a warrant (the "Cole Warrant") to purchase up to 9,406.36
shares of Class A Common Stock with an exercise price of $74.42 per share,
subject to certain adjustments, was granted to Mr. Cole. The Cole Warrant
is presently exercisable and expires on July 11, 2002. See "Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions -- Cole Warrant."
(14) Represents 401(k) matching fund contributions by the Company.
74
77
(15) As part of a severance package, Mr. Cole was, among other things, paid a
lump sum amount of $219,194 and reimbursed by the Company for the
acquisition of an automobile valued at approximately $22,000 which was
previously leased by the Company. All such amounts were paid during fiscal
1998.
OPTION GRANTS IN FISCAL 1997
The following table sets forth options to purchase shares of the Class A
Common Stock granted to the Named Executive Officers during fiscal 1997. Prior
to fiscal 1997, no options were granted by the Company.
POTENTIAL REALIZED
VALUE AT ASSUMED
NUMBER OF % OF TOTAL ANNUAL RATES OF STOCK
SECURITIES OPTIONS PRICE APPRECIATION FOR
UNDERLYING GRANTED TO OPTION TERM
OPTIONS EMPLOYEES IN EXERCISE -----------------------
NAME GRANTED FISCAL YEAR PRICE EXPIRATION DATE 5% 10%
- ---- ---------- ------------ -------- --------------- --------- -----------
Louis Brunel...................... 16,034.79 18.40% $85.75 November, 2006 $758,067 $1,867,155
Rory Cole(1)...................... 9,406.36 10.80% $74.42 November, 2006 $551,273 $1,201,888
Michael E. Katzenstein............ 9,137.61 10.49% $74.42 November, 2006 $535,522 $1,167,549
Bertrand Blanchette............... 4,373.12 5.02% $85.75 November, 2006 $206,745 $ 509,224
Stephen Dube...................... 3,381.88 3.88% $85.75 November, 2006 $159,883 $ 393,800
Lynn Zera......................... 2,565.57 2.94% $85.75 November, 2006 $121,291 $ 298,745
- ---------------
(1) In connection with the termination of Mr. Cole's employment, all of the
options granted to Mr. Cole were exchanged for the Cole Warrant. See Note 13
to the Summary Compensation Table.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN FISCAL 1997 AND FISCAL YEAR END OPTION VALUES
The following table shows the values of options held by the Named Executive
Officers as of the end of fiscal 1997. No options were exercised by the Named
Executive Officers during fiscal 1997.
NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY
OPTIONS AT FISCAL YEAR-END OPTIONS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
1997(#) 1997($)(1)
--------------------------- ---------------------------
NAME EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
- ---- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
Louis Brunel.......................... -- 16,034.79 -- --
Rory Cole(2).......................... -- -- -- --
Michael E. Katzenstein................ -- 9,137.61 -- $103,529
Bertrand Blanchette................... -- 4,373.12 -- --
Stephen Dube.......................... -- 3,381.88 -- --
Lynn Zera............................. 641.25 1,924.32 -- --
- ---------------
(1) The value of the options at fiscal year-end 1997 is based on an assumed fair
market value of $85.75 per share of Class A Common Stock.
(2) In connection with the termination of Mr. Cole's employment, all of the
options granted to Mr. Cole were exchanged for the Cole Warrant. See Note 13
to the Summary Compensation Table. At fiscal year-end 1997, the Cole Warrant
was presently exercisable and, assuming a cashless exercise, had a value of
$106,574 based on an assumed fair market value of $85.75 per share of Class
A Common Stock.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
Louis Brunel is employed as President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company pursuant to an at will employment agreement. Under the employment
agreement, Mr. Brunel currently receives an annual base salary of $350,000, a
Company automobile and a housing allowance. In addition, Mr. Brunel is entitled
to participate in the Company's Incentive Stock Plan (as described below) and
Bonus Plan (as described below). If Mr. Brunel's employment is terminated by the
Company for other than cause, Mr. Brunel will receive a severance payment equal
to two years base salary.
Michael E. Katzenstein is employed as Vice President, Legal Affairs and
General Counsel of the Company pursuant to an employment agreement expiring in
November 2000. Under the employment
75
78
agreement, Mr. Katzenstein currently receives an annual base salary of $182,000
and a Company automobile. In addition, Mr. Katzenstein is entitled to
participate in the Company's Incentive Stock Plan and Bonus Plan.
Bertrand Blanchette is employed as Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company pursuant to an at will employment agreement. Under the
employment agreement, Mr. Blanchette currently receives an annual base salary of
$158,000 and a Company automobile. In addition, Mr. Blanchette is entitled to
participate in the Company's Incentive Stock Plan and Bonus Plan.
Stephen Dube is employed as Vice President, Operations of the Company
pursuant to an at will employment agreement. Under the employment agreement, Mr.
Dube currently receives an annual base salary of $180,000 and a Company
automobile. In addition, Mr. Dube is entitled to participate in the Company's
Incentive Stock Plan and Bonus Plan.
Lynn Zera is employed as Vice President, Human Resources of the Company
pursuant to an at will employment agreement. Under the employment agreement, Ms.
Zera currently receives an annual base salary of $124,000. In addition, Ms. Zera
is entitled to participate in the Company's Incentive Stock Plan and Bonus Plan.
Upon termination by the Company of any of its most senior executives
without cause, the Company has in the past offered severance equal to one year's
base salary.
INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN
In fiscal 1997, the Company adopted an Incentive Stock Plan. In fiscal
1998, the Company adopted amendments to such plan, certain of which will become
effective, subject to stockholder approval, on the date, if any, the IPO is
consummated and certain of which will become effective immediately upon
stockholder approval (as so amended, the "Plan"). As of May 31, 1998, options to
purchase 88,557.98 shares of Class A Common Stock have been granted under the
Plan, none of which have been exercised, at a weighted average exercise price of
$84.37 per share of Class A Common Stock. The Plan authorizes the Board to issue
incentive stock options as defined in Section 422(b) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), stock options that do not conform to the
requirements of that Code section, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
stock awards, dividend equivalent rights, performance based awards and similar
stock-based awards. If the IPO is consummated, (i) five percent of the Class A
Common Stock outstanding, on a fully diluted basis, on the date the IPO is
consummated, will be issuable under the terms of the Plan, (ii) the number of
shares issuable under the Plan will be adjusted on each January 1 to 5% of the
then outstanding Class A Common Stock, on a fully diluted basis, if such
adjustment would increase the number of shares, and (iii) the Plan will
terminate on the tenth anniversary of the date the IPO is consummated.
STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
In fiscal 1998, the Company adopted the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(the "Stock Purchase Plan") which will become effective, subject to stockholder
approval, on the date, if any, the IPO is consummated. One percent of the Class
A Common Stock outstanding, on a fully diluted basis, on the date the IPO is
consummated will be issuable under the terms of the Stock Purchase Plan.
ANNUAL BONUS PLAN
The Company has adopted an Annual Bonus Plan (the "Bonus Plan") pursuant to
which the Board is authorized to grant cash bonuses to certain employees of the
Company. Bonuses are payable only if the Company achieves certain performance
targets approved by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the fiscal
year.
401(K) PLAN
The Company has implemented an employee savings and retirement plan (the
"401(k) Plan") covering certain of the Company's employees who have at least
three months of service with the Company and have attained the age of 21.
Pursuant to the 401(k) Plan, eligible employees may elect to reduce their
current
76
79
compensation by up to the lesser of 15% of such compensation or the statutorily
prescribed annual limit and have the amount of such reduction contributed to the
401(k) Plan. The Company has made, and may in the future make, contributions to
the 401(k) Plan on behalf of eligible employees. Employees become 100% vested in
these Company contributions after one year of service. The 401(k) Plan is
intended to qualify under Section 401 of the Code so that contributions by
employees or by the Company to the 401(k) Plan, and income earned on the 401(k)
Plan contributions, are not taxable to employees until withdrawn from the 401(k)
Plan, and so that contributions by the Company, if any, will be deductible by
the Company when made. The trustee under the 401(k) Plan, at the direction of
each participant, invests the 401(k) Plan employee salary deferrals in selected
investment options.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board has an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee. The
functions of the Audit Committee include recommending to the Board the retention
of independent public accountants, reviewing the scope of the annual audit
undertaken by the Company's independent public accountants and the progress and
results of their work and reviewing the financial statements of the Company and
its internal accounting and auditing procedures. The Audit Committee is composed
of Claude Chagnon, William O. Hunt, Lynn McDonald and Alain Michel. The chairman
of the Audit Committee is Mr. Hunt. The function of the Compensation Committee
is to supervise the Company's compensation policies, administer the employee
incentive plans, review officers' salaries and bonuses, approve significant
changes in employee benefits and consider other matters referred to it by the
Board. The Compensation Committee is composed of Claude Chagnon, William O.
Hunt, Lynn McDonald and Alain Michel. The Chairman of the Compensation Committee
is Mr. Chagnon.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
Directors of the Company who are neither employees of the Company nor
designees of the Company's significant stockholders will receive an annual fee
of $15,000, a fee of $1,000 per meeting of the Board and an annual fee of $1,500
if they serve as the chairperson of a committee of the Board. Each such Director
will also receive options to purchase shares of Class A Common Stock having an
aggregate value of $150,000 with an exercise price equal to the fair market
value on the date of grant as determined by the Board (or at the initial public
offering price if the proposed IPO is consummated). The options will become
exercisable in equal installments on each of the second, third, fourth and fifth
anniversaries of the effective date of the grant. Directors who are either
employees of the Company or designees of the Company's significant stockholders
will not be compensated for their services. However, all Directors will be
reimbursed for actual out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in connection with
their attending meetings of the Board or any committees of the Board.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
During fiscal 1997, Mr. Brunel served as a member of the Compensation
Committee. Effective May 19, 1998, Mr. Brunel resigned from the Compensation
Committee.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY; INDEMNIFICATION; INSURANCE
The Company's Certificate of Incorporation provides that the Company shall,
to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law (the
"DGCL"), indemnify all persons which it may indemnify pursuant thereto (i.e.,
directors and officers) and shall advance expenses incurred in defending any
proceeding for which such right to indemnification is applicable, provided that,
if the DGCL so requires, the indemnitee provides the Company with an undertaking
to repay all amounts advanced if it is determined by a final judicial decision
that such person is not entitled to indemnification pursuant to this provision.
The Company's Certificate of Incorporation also contains a provision eliminating
the personal liability of the Company's directors for monetary damages for
breach of any fiduciary duty. By virtue of this provision, under the DGCL, a
director of the Company will not be personally liable for monetary damages for
breach of his fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability for (i) any
breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the
77
80
Company or its stockholders, (ii) acts or omissions not in good faith or which
involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) dividends or
stock purchases or redemptions that are unlawful under the DGCL and (iv) any
transaction from which a director derives an improper personal benefit. However,
this provision of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation pertains only to
breaches of duty by directors as directors and not in any other corporate
capacity such as officers, and limits liability only for breaches of fiduciary
duties under the DGCL and not for violations of other laws, such as the federal
securities laws. As a result of the inclusion of such provision, stockholders
may be unable to recover monetary damages against directors for actions taken by
them that constitute negligence or gross negligence or that are in violation of
their fiduciary duties, although it may be possible to obtain injunctive or
other equitable relief with respect to such actions. The inclusion of this
provision in the Company's Certificate of Incorporation may have the effect of
reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against directors, and may
discourage or deter stockholders or management from bringing a lawsuit against
directors for breach of their duty of care, even though such an action, if
successful, might otherwise have benefitted the Company and its stockholders.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling OpTel pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, OpTel has been informed that in the opinion of the
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Company
of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the
Company in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted
by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the Company will, unless in the opinion of its
counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court
of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by
the final adjudication of such issue.
The directors and officers of the Company are insured (subject to certain
exceptions and deductions) against liabilities that they may incur in their
capacity as such, including liabilities under the Securities Act, under a
liability insurance policy carried by GVL. Such policy provides coverage in an
aggregate amount of $50 million (subject to a $250,000 deductible) and expires
in October 1998. The Company expects that this insurance will be renewed in the
ordinary course.
78
81
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth certain information, as of August 31, 1998,
regarding the beneficial ownership of the Common Stock by (i) each Director of
the Company who beneficially owns any Common Stock, (ii) each Named Executive
Officer, (iii) each person known by the Company to beneficially own 5% or more
of the outstanding shares of any class of Common Stock and (iv) all directors
and executive officers of the Company as a group.
PERCENT OF
AMOUNT AND PERCENT OF TOTAL
NATURE OF PERCENT OF TOTAL SHARES VOTING
BENEFICIAL OWNER TITLE OF CLASS OWNERSHIP(1)(2) CLASS(2) OUTSTANDING(2) POWER(2)
- ---------------- -------------------- --------------- ---------- -------------- ----------
Le Groupe Videotron Ltee........... Multi-Vote Common 1,923,559.00(3) 81.73% 70.13% 81.17%
Caisse de depot et placement du
Quebec........................... Multi-Vote Common 429,939.00(4) 18.27 15.68 18.14
Interactive Cable Systems, Inc..... Class A Common Stock 164,271.54(5) 100.00 5.99 *
James A. Kofalt.................... Class A Common Stock 24,992.00(6) 13.20 * *
Rory Cole.......................... Class A Common Stock 9,406.36(7) 5.42 * *
Louis Brunel....................... Class A Common Stock 13,119.67(8) 7.40 * *
Michael E. Katzenstein............. Class A Common Stock 2,284.40(9) 1.37 * *
Bertrand Blanchette................ Class A Common Stock 1,093.28(10) * * *
Stephen Dube....................... Class A Common Stock 2,390.67(11) 1.43 * *
Lynn Zera.......................... Class A Common Stock 1,282.78(12) * * *
All directors and officers as a
group (13 persons)............... Class A Common Stock 20,675.58(13) 11.19 * *
- ---------------
(1) Except as otherwise indicated in the other footnotes to this table, each
person named in the table has sole voting and dispositive power with
respect to the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by such person.
(2) "*" indicates less than one percent. In accordance with the Commission's
rules, each beneficial owner's holdings have been calculated assuming the
full exercise of warrants and options and the conversion of all shares of
convertible preferred stock held by such holder which are currently
exercisable or convertible or which will become exercisable or convertible
within 60 days after the date of this Prospectus and no exercise of
warrants and options or conversion of preferred stock held by any other
person.
(3) Such shares are owned by VPC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of GVL.
Andre Chagnon, the founder of GVL, indirectly controls approximately 72% of
GVL's outstanding voting rights. All such shares are fully convertible into
Class A Common Stock on a one-for-one basis upon the occurrence of a
Conversion Event. See "-- Stockholders' Agreement" and "-- GVL
Shareholders' Agreement" for the terms of certain agreements governing the
voting and disposition of the shares of Common Stock held by VPC and GVL.
Excludes 6,962.21 shares of Series A Preferred which will be convertible
into Multi-Vote Common should the proposed IPO be consummated. GVL's
address is 300 Avenue Viger East, Montreal, Quebec, H2X 3W4.
(4) Such shares are owned by CDPQ, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Caisse. All
such shares are fully convertible into Class A Common Stock on a
one-for-one basis upon the occurrence of a Conversion Event. See "--
Stockholders' Agreement" and "-- GVL Shareholders' Agreement" for the terms
of certain agreements covering the voting and disposition of the shares of
Common Stock held by Caisse and CDPQ. In addition, Caisse holds $20.0
million of 1998 Series A Notes which it purchased from the initial
purchasers of the Offering. Caisse's address is 1981, Avenue McGill
College, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 3C7.
(5) See "-- ICS Stockholders' Agreement and ICS Registration Rights Agreement"
for the terms of certain agreements governing the disposition of such
shares of Common Stock. Includes shares currently held in escrow pending
the satisfaction of transfer conditions with respect to the balance of the
acquisition of the ICS Operations. Excludes shares of Series B Preferred
held by ICS which will be convertible into Class A Common Stock should the
proposed IPO be consummated. ICS's address is 1901 N. Glenville Drive,
Suite 800, Richardson, Texas 75081.
(6) Represents a presently exercisable warrant to purchase 24,992 shares of
Class A Common Stock. Mr. Kofalt's address is 50209 Manly, Chapel Hill,
North Carolina 27514.
(7) Represents a presently exercisable warrant to purchase 9,406.36 shares of
Class A Common Stock. Mr. Cole's address is 4339 Beverly Drive, Dallas,
Texas 75205.
(8) Includes 13,119.67 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying presently
exercisable options. Excludes 13,119.67 shares of Class A Common Stock
underlying options which are not exercisable until at least 60 days after
the date of this Prospectus.
(9) Includes 2,284.40 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying presently
exercisable options. Excludes 6,853.21 shares of Class A Common Stock
underlying options which are not exercisable until at least 60 days after
the date of this Prospectus.
(10) Includes 1,093.28 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying presently
exercisable options. Excludes 3,279.84 shares of Class A Common Stock
underlying options which are not exercisable until at least 60 days after
the date of this Prospectus.
(11) Includes 2,390.67 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying presently
exercisable options. Excludes 3,906.71 shares of Class A Common Stock
underlying options which are not exercisable until at least 60 days after
the date of this Prospectus.
79
82
(12) Includes 1,282.78 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying presently
exercisable options. Excludes 1,282.79 shares of Class A Common Stock
underlying options which are not exercisable until at least 60 days after
the date of this Prospectus.
(13) With respect to executive officers who are not Named Executive Officers,
includes 524.77 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying presently
exercisable options and excludes 9,387.75 shares of Class A Common Stock
underlying options which are not exercisable until at least 60 days after
the date of this Prospectus.
As of May 31, 1998, all of the outstanding shares of the Multi-Vote Common
were held by VPC and CDPQ and all of the outstanding shares of Class A Common
Stock were held by ICS. See "Risk Factors -- Control by GVL."
ICS STOCKHOLDERS' AGREEMENT AND ICS REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT
In connection with the Company's acquisition of the ICS Operations, ICS,
Nomura Holding America, Inc. ("Nomura"), MCI (ICS, Nomura, and MCI, together,
the "ICS Group"), VPC, GVL and the Company entered into a Stockholders'
Agreement (the "ICS Stockholders' Agreement") dated as of April 9, 1998 and the
Company, ICS, Nomura and MCI entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the
"ICS Registration Rights Agreement") dated as of April 9, 1998.
Under the ICS Stockholders' Agreement, (i) the transfer of the shares of
Class A Common Stock and Series B Preferred owned by the ICS Group
(collectively, the "ICS Shares") is restricted, subject to certain exceptions,
(ii) the ICS Shares are subject to drag-along rights if VPC (or GVL through the
sale of its interests in VPC) elects to sell equity interests representing 50%
or more of the voting power of the outstanding capital stock of the Company or
50% or more of the equity interests held by VPC and (iii) the transfer of the
ICS Shares are subject to certain first offer rights of the Company and VPC. In
addition, the ICS Group has certain tag-along rights in connection with sales by
VPC of outstanding shares of the Company's Common Stock.
Pursuant to the ICS Registration Rights Agreement, following the
consummation of an initial public offering of the Company's common equity, the
ICS Group has piggyback registration rights, on three occasions, in registration
statements filed by the Company for the sale of its equity securities, subject
to certain conditions, including customary allocation and holdback provisions.
The ICS Group also has certain demand registration rights in the event that the
Company has not consummated an initial public offering of its common equity
prior to April 9, 2002.
STOCKHOLDERS' AGREEMENT
In August 1997, CDPQ purchased the minority interest in the Company from
Vanguard Communications L.P. ("Vanguard"). In connection with the sale by
Vanguard of its minority stock position in the Company to CDPQ, the Company, VPC
and CDPQ entered into the Stockholders' Agreement and the Company and CDPQ
entered into a related Registration Rights Agreement (the "Registration Rights
Agreement"), under which CDPQ has certain rights and obligations relating to the
Company and VPC. CDPQ is also a party to the GVL Shareholders' Agreement
described below. The following is a summary of certain provisions of the
Stockholders' Agreement and the Registration Rights Agreement.
Designation of Directors. Under the Stockholders' Agreement, for as long as
CDPQ holds at least 5% of the Company's voting stock, CDPQ may designate a
number of Directors of the Company and each of its subsidiaries, and each
committee of the Board and each of its subsidiaries, which is proportionate (in
relation to the total number of Directors or committee members) to CDPQ's
percentage ownership of the Company's voting stock, but in no event less than
one Director and one committee member. This agreement supersedes the rights of
Caisse to designate a Director of the Company pursuant to the GVL Shareholders'
Agreement; however, such rights are subject to reinstatement in the event CDPQ
ceases to be a stockholder of the Company. Pursuant to the terms of the
Stockholders' Agreement, CDPQ has designated Lynn McDonald as a Director of the
Company.
Approval of Certain Actions by CDPQ. Pursuant to the Stockholders'
Agreement, until the consummation of an initial public offering of the Company's
voting common stock, CDPQ has the right to approve certain corporate actions
including: (i) any amendment to the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of
the
80
83
Company or any subsidiary; (ii) any change in the capital stock of the Company
or any subsidiary; (iii) the acquisition or disposition by the Company or any
subsidiary of assets or securities in excess of $10 million in any single
transaction or $40 million in the aggregate in any fiscal year; (iv) a merger or
other business combination involving the Company or any subsidiary if the
consideration paid for such merger or business combination is in excess of $10
million in any single transaction or $40 million in the aggregate in any fiscal
year; and (v) the incurrence by the Company or certain subsidiaries of
indebtedness not permitted under the 1997 Notes Indenture.
Rights in Connection with Other Financings; Tag-Along Rights. Pursuant to
the Stockholders' Agreement, VPC is obligated to cause the Company to afford
CDPQ rights equivalent to those afforded other purchasers of the Company's
capital stock to the extent they are more advantageous than the rights held by
CDPQ. Subject to certain exceptions (including a public offering of the
Company's equity securities) and waiver by CDPQ at VPC's request in connection
with certain events, the Company is obligated to afford CDPQ preemptive rights
to purchase equity securities which the Company proposes to sell in proportion
to CDPQ's ownership of the total outstanding equity securities of the Company
prior to the sale. In addition, pursuant to the Stockholders' Agreement, CDPQ
has certain tag-along rights in connection with sales by VPC of outstanding
shares of the Company's voting stock.
Registration Rights. Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, nine
months after the consummation of an initial public offering of the Company's
equity securities and, subject to certain conditions, CDPQ has the right, on two
occasions, to require the Company to register under the Securities Act shares of
Class A Common Stock issued to CDPQ upon the conversion of the Multi-Vote
Common. In addition, CDPQ has piggyback registration rights, on three occasions,
to include Common Stock held by it in registration statements filed by the
Company for the sale of its equity securities, subject to certain conditions,
including customary allocation and holdback provisions.
GVL SHAREHOLDERS' AGREEMENT
Caisse, CDPQ, Sojecci Ltee and Sojecci (1995) Ltee, the principal
shareholders of GVL, and Andre Chagnon (the founder of GVL) are parties to an
amended and restated shareholders agreement, dated as of May 10, 1995 (the "GVL
Shareholders' Agreement"), which provides, among other things, that for so long
as GVL controls the Company, Caisse will be allowed to select one of GVL's
nominees to the Board and to have one representative on the Audit Committee of
the Company. While this right has been superseded by the Stockholders'
Agreement, it is subject to reinstatement in the event CDPQ ceases to be a
stockholder of the Company or the Stockholders' Agreement ceases to be
enforceable. See "-- Stockholders' Agreement."
81
84
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
CONVERTIBLE NOTES AND SERIES A PREFERRED
The Company has financed a large portion of its capital needs by borrowing
from its majority stockholder, VPC. The Company borrowed approximately $17.8
million, $73.4 million and $23.7 million from VPC in the form of the GVL Notes
during the eight month period ended August 31, 1995, fiscal 1996 and fiscal
1997, respectively. The GVL Notes bore interest at a rate of 15% per annum,
payable concurrently with the payment of principal. Interest was added to
principal on an annual basis. Effective March 1, 1998, VPC exchanged all of the
GVL Notes for 6,962.21365 shares of the Series A Preferred. In connection with
the proposed IPO, VPC has advised the Company that it intends to convert all of
its shares of Series A Preferred into Multi-Vote Common upon the consummation of
the proposed IPO.
In addition, on July 26, 1995, VPC purchased from the Company (i) 311,652
shares of Multi-Vote Common for approximately $16.7 million and (ii) a 15%
convertible note having a principal amount of approximately $8.3 million. On
April 1, 1996, the note was converted into 155,229 shares of Multi-Vote Common
(after giving effect to the contribution, in connection with the settlement of
certain disputes between the then principal stockholders, of certain shares
received by VPC as accrued interest on the note).
VANGUARD-RELATED TRANSACTIONS
In August 1996, in connection with a negotiated settlement of certain
disputes between the Company and Vanguard, which then held a minority interest
in the Company, the Company granted Vanguard an option (the "Vanguard Option")
to purchase 48,937 shares of Multi-Vote Common at an exercise price of $53.55
per share, subject to adjustment. On August 15, 1997, Vanguard exercised the
option prior to the sale of its minority interest in the Company to CDPQ.
In September 1996, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with
James A. Kofalt, a former Chairman of the Board and active participant in the
management of the Company and a limited partner of Vanguard, pursuant to which
the Company agreed to compensate Mr. Kofalt with a one time payment of $70,000.
In connection therewith, the Company also granted Mr. Kofalt a warrant (the
"Kofalt Warrant") to purchase up to 24,992 shares of Class A Common Stock at an
exercise price of $53.55 per share, subject to adjustment. The Kofalt Warrant is
presently exercisable and expires on August 31, 1999. In addition, pursuant to
the terms of the Kofalt Warrant, Mr. Kofalt has piggyback registration rights in
registration statements filed by the Company for the sale of its equity
securities, subject to certain conditions, including customary allocation and
holdback provisions.
MANAGEMENT FEES
In connection with a negotiated settlement of certain disputes between the
Company and Vanguard, in August 1996, VPC and Vanguard agreed to provide, at the
specific request of the Board, such reasonable consultant, advisory and
management services as the Company might reasonably require. These arrangements
with Vanguard and VPC were terminated as of August 15, 1997, upon the sale of
Vanguard's minority interest in the Company to CDPQ. The Company has not
determined if the aggregate fees paid to VPC and Vanguard in connection with
such services were greater or less than the fees the Company would have been
required to pay if it had obtained such services from an unaffiliated third
party. The Company accrued a liability of $29,167 to each of VPC and Vanguard
for general consulting services during fiscal 1996. Vanguard was paid such
amount during fiscal 1997. In fiscal 1997, the Company accrued and paid Vanguard
$350,000 (plus travel expenses) for such services and accrued $350,000 to VPC
for similar services. None of such amounts have been paid to VPC.
LICENSE HOLDING COMPANY
The Company has assigned substantially all of its frequency licenses to THI
in exchange for a $1.0 million secured promissory note with interest at 8% due
on February 14, 2007 (the "License Note"). The
82
85
License Note contains covenants which restrict THI from, among other things,
incurring indebtedness other than to the Company or in the ordinary course of
business, and merging or consolidating with another entity.
Section 310(b) of the Communications Act prohibits any corporation of which
more than one-fifth of the capital stock is owned or voted by non-U.S. citizens
from holding a common carrier radio station license. In addition, under Section
310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, the FCC may, if it finds that it would
serve the public interest, deny or revoke a common carrier license if the
applicant or licensee is controlled directly or indirectly by any other
corporation of which more than one-fourth of the capital stock is owned or voted
by non-U.S. citizens. GVL, the Company's indirect principal stockholder, is a
Canadian corporation. Consequently, THI was created to permit the Company to use
the Assigned Licenses, modified as necessary, to provide "common carrier"
telecommunications services in the event that the Company should desire to do so
in the future. Russell S. Berman, Henry Goldberg and Thomas Watson, each U.S.
citizens, each own one-third of the outstanding equity interests in THI. Russell
S. Berman is a partner at Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP which represents
both the Company and THI with respect to various legal matters. Henry Goldberg
is a partner at Goldberg, Godles, Wiener & Wright which represents both the
Company and THI with respect to certain federal regulatory matters. Mr. Watson
is Vice President, Engineering and Information Services of OpTel.
To establish the terms of the Company's continued and unencumbered use of
the Assigned Licenses, the Company and THI entered into a license and services
agreement (the "THI Agreement") pursuant to which THI agreed to provide to the
Company all the transmission capacity it requires or may in the future require
and the Company granted THI a nonexclusive license to use all of the Company's
facilities and related equipment, such as microwave transmitting and receiving
equipment, required to provide such transmission capacity. THI will obtain
future licenses necessary to provide the Company with the transmission capacity
it requires. The THI Agreement provides for payments from the Company to THI
which are expected to approximate the monthly interest due on the License Note
plus an allowance for the anticipated expenses of THI. The Company may also
advance funds to THI to the extent necessary to enable THI to fulfill its
obligations under the THI Agreement. All amounts of such advances will be added
to the principal of the License Note. It is not expected that payments made by
the Company to THI will have a material impact on the Company's cash flows or
results of operations.
In connection with the above described transaction, the Company received an
option from THI (the "THI Option") to purchase all or, in certain circumstances,
some of the assets of THI and a separate option from each stockholder of THI
(each, an "Individual Option") to purchase all of such person's shares of
capital stock of THI. The exercise price of the THI Option is equal to the
current principal of, plus the accrued interest on, the License Note on the
closing date, which may be paid by tendering to THI the License Note plus an
amount equal to the lesser of (i) the book value of the assets being purchased
or (ii) the initial capitalization of THI plus a 10% premium compounded
annually. The exercise price of each Individual Option is equal to the lesser of
(x) the book value of the shares being purchased and (y) the price paid for such
shares plus a 10% premium compounded annually. The THI Option and the Individual
Options are exercisable at any time prior to February 14, 2007, subject to FCC
approval.
In 1997, the United States agreed, in the context of the WTO Basic Telecom
Agreement, to allow foreign suppliers from WTO member nations, including Canada,
to provide a broad range of basic telecommunications services in the United
States. Those commitments became effective in February 1998. In light of those
commitments, the FCC has determined that it will adopt an "open entry standard"
for suppliers of telecommunications services from WTO member nations. In
conjunction with its new open entry policies, the FCC has adopted a presumption
favoring grant of applications to exceed the 25 percent limit on non-U.S.
ownership contained in Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act when the
non-U.S. investment is from a WTO member nation. Accordingly, the Company is in
the process of reevaluating whether it should hold FCC authorizations directly
and, specifically, whether it should exercise its option to purchase the assets
or stock of THI.
83
86
ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN ASSETS
Effective as of July 31, 1996, the Company purchased certain assets from
certain affiliates of VPC for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $3.9
million. The assets represented approximately 23,000 units passed. The
operations of the acquired assets are located in the San Francisco, California
and Tampa, Florida areas. The amounts paid represented the sellers' historical
costs. At the time of the purchase, the Board received a valuation report which
estimated the fair market value of such assets to be approximately equal to
their historical cost.
INSURANCE
The Company purchases certain insurance coverage through GVL, including
directors' and officers' liability insurance. The Company paid an aggregate of
approximately $478,000 and $434,000 to GVL for this insurance coverage in fiscal
1996 and 1997, respectively.
SERVICE AGREEMENTS
Pursuant to the terms of the Stockholders' Agreement, VPC and certain of
its affiliates provide certain strategic planning and treasury support services
to the Company and perform internal audits of the Company's operations.
Additional services may be provided as and when requested by the Company. The
Company is charged for such services based on an estimate of the actual cost of
the personnel engaged and materials used to provide such services (without an
allowance for profit). The Company estimates that its costs for such services in
fiscal 1998 will not exceed $310,000.
In addition, OpTel provides certain customer support and billing services
to certain affiliates of GVL which operate wireless cable systems using MMDS
technology. OpTel charges such affiliates based on the actual cost of the
personnel engaged and materials used to provide such services.
SHARED LITIGATION EXPENSES
GVL, the Company and certain other affiliates of GVL have been named as
defendants in a lawsuit by a former employee of the Company. GVL and the Company
have agreed to joint representation by a single law firm and to share the
associated expenses. The Company does not believe the litigation (or the
associated expenses) to be material.
84
87
DESCRIPTION OF OTHER INDEBTEDNESS
THE 1997 NOTES
As of May 31, 1998, the Company had outstanding $225,000,000 principal
amount of 13% Senior Notes due 2005. The 1997 Notes mature on February 15, 2005.
Cash interest on the 1997 Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on each
February 15 and August 15 at a rate of 13% per annum. Upon issuance of the 1997
Notes, the Company deposited with an escrow agent an amount of cash and
government securities that, together with the proceeds from the investment
thereof, was estimated to be sufficient to pay when due the first six interest
payments on the 1997 Notes, with the balance to be retained by the Company. The
1997 Notes are collateralized by a first priority security interest in such
escrow account. The 1997 Notes may be redeemed at the Company's option at any
time after February 15, 2002 upon payment of the redemption price plus accrued
and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. In the event of a change
of control of the Company, holders of the 1997 Notes have the right to require
the Company to purchase their 1997 Notes, in whole or in part, at a price equal
to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if
any, to the date of purchase.
The 1997 Notes Indenture contains certain covenants that, among other
things, limit the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to make certain
restricted payments, incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends or make other
distributions, repurchase equity interests or subordinated indebtedness, create
certain liens, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, sell assets of
the Company or its subsidiaries, issue or sell equity interests of the Company's
subsidiaries or enter into certain mergers and consolidations. In addition,
under certain circumstances, the Company is required to offer to purchase 1997
Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and
unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase, with the proceeds of certain
asset sales. The 1997 Notes Indenture also provides for customary events of
default. The covenants set forth in the 1997 Notes Indenture are similar, but
more restrictive in some instances, to those in the Indenture governing the 1998
Notes, including with respect to the covenants described below under the caption
"Description of the 1998 Series B Notes -- Certain Covenants -- Limitation on
Additional Indebtedness." This description is intended as a summary and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the 1997 Notes Indenture, a copy of
which has been filed as an exhibit hereto.
THE SENIOR CREDIT FACILITY
On December 19, 1997, the Company obtained the Senior Credit Facility from
a group of financial institutions. The Senior Credit Facility consisted of a
$125 million term loan (which was drawn on December 19, 1997) bearing interest
at LIBOR plus 3.5% and a $25 million revolving credit commitment. The Senior
Credit Facility was terminated on July 7, 1998.
85
88
DESCRIPTION OF THE 1998 SERIES B NOTES
Set forth below is a summary of certain provisions of the 1998 Series B
Notes. The 1998 Series B Notes, like the 1998 Series A Notes, will be issued
under the Indenture dated as of July 7, 1998, between the Issuer and U.S. Trust
Company of Texas, N.A., as trustee (the "Trustee"), a copy of which has been
filed as an exhibit hereto. The terms of the 1998 Series B Notes are
substantially identical in all material respects (including interest rate and
maturity) to the 1998 Series A Notes except for certain transfer restrictions
and registration rights relating to the 1998 Series A Notes. The following
summary of certain provisions of the Indenture does not purport to be complete
and is subject to, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the Trust
Indenture Act of 1939, as amended (the "Trust Indenture Act"), and to all of the
provisions of the Indenture, including the definitions of certain terms therein
and those terms made a part of the Indenture by reference to the Trust Indenture
Act, as in effect on the date of the Indenture. The definitions of certain
capitalized terms used in the following summary are set forth below under
"Certain Definitions." As of the date of this Prospectus, $200,000,000 principal
amount of 1998 Series A Notes were outstanding.
GENERAL
The 1998 Series B Notes will be general senior obligations of the Issuer.
The 1998 Series B Notes will be collateralized by a first priority security
interest in the Escrow Account described under "-- Disbursement of Funds; Escrow
Account." The 1998 Series B Notes will be issued only in fully registered form
without coupons, in denominations of $1,000 principal amount and integral
multiples thereof. Principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the 1998
Series B Notes are payable, and the 1998 Series B Notes are exchangeable and
transferable, at the office or agency of the Issuer in the City of New York
maintained for such purposes (which initially will be the corporate trust office
of the Trustee). See "Book-Entry; Delivery and Form." No service charge will be
made for any registration of transfer, exchange or redemption of the 1998 Series
B Notes, except in certain circumstances for any tax or other governmental
charge that may be imposed in connection therewith.
MATURITY, INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL
The 1998 Notes are limited to $200,000,000 aggregate principal amount and
will mature on July 1, 2008. Interest on the 1998 Series B Notes will accrue at
a rate of 11 1/2% per annum and be payable semi-annually in arrears on each
January 1 and July 1 (each, an "Interest Payment Date"), commencing January 1,
1999 to registered holders of 1998 Notes, on December 15 or June 15, as the case
may be, immediately preceding such Interest Payment Date. Interest will accrue
from the most recent Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid or
duly provided for or, if no interest has been paid or duly provided for, from
the Issue Date. Cash interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of
twelve 30-day months. If the Issuer defaults on any payment of principal and/or
premium (whether upon redemption or otherwise), cash interest will accrue on the
amount in default and, to the extent permitted by law, on overdue installments
of interest at the rate of interest borne by the 1998 Series B Notes.
REDEMPTION
Optional Redemption. The 1998 Series B Notes will be redeemable, at the
option of the Issuer, in whole or in part, at any time on or after July 1, 2003,
upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days' notice, at the redemption prices
(expressed as percentages of principal amount) set forth below, plus accrued and
unpaid
86
89
interest to the redemption date, if redeemed during the 12-month period
beginning July 1 of the years indicated below:
YEAR REDEMPTION PRICE
---- ----------------
2003........................................................ 105.7500%
2004........................................................ 102.8750
2005........................................................ 102.8750
2006........................................................ 101.4375
2007 and thereafter......................................... 100.0000%
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event prior to July 1, 2001 of (i)
one or more Equity Offerings and/or (ii) a sale or series of related sales by
the Issuer of its Common Stock to one or more Strategic Equity Investors for
aggregate gross proceeds of $100.0 million or more, the Issuer may redeem, at
its option, up to a maximum of 35% of the initially outstanding aggregate
principal amount of 1998 Notes from the net proceeds thereof at a redemption
price equal to 111.50% of the principal amount of the 1998 Notes (determined at
the redemption date), together with accrued and unpaid interest to the date of
redemption; provided that not less than $130.0 million aggregate principal
amount of 1998 Notes are outstanding immediately following such redemption. Any
such redemption may only be effected once and must be effected upon not less
than 30 nor more than 60 days' notice given within 30 days after the last such
Equity Offering or sale to a Strategic Equity Investor, as the case may be,
resulting in gross proceeds of $100.0 million or more.
Mandatory Redemption. The Issuer will not be required to make any mandatory
sinking fund payments in respect of the 1998 Series B Notes. However, (i) upon
the occurrence of a Change of Control, each holder of the 1998 Series B Notes
will have the right to require the Issuer to make an offer to purchase all
outstanding 1998 Series B Notes at a price of 101% of the principal amount
thereof (determined at the date of purchase), plus accrued interest thereon, if
any, to the date of purchase, and (ii) upon the occurrence of an Asset Sale, the
Issuer may be obligated to make an offer to purchase all or a portion of the
outstanding 1998 Series B Notes at a price of 100% of the principal amount,
thereof (determined at the date of purchase), plus accrued and unpaid interest,
if any, to the date of purchase. See "-- Certain Covenants -- Change of Control"
and "-- Disposition of Proceeds of Asset Sales," respectively.
Selection; Effect of Redemption Notice. In the case of a partial
redemption, selection of the 1998 Notes for redemption will be made pro rata, by
lot or such other method as the Trustee in its sole discretion deems appropriate
and just; provided that any redemption pursuant to the provisions relating to
one or more Equity Offerings and/or sales to a Strategic Equity Investor shall
be made on a pro rata basis or on as nearly a pro rata basis as practicable
(subject to the procedures of The Depository Trust Company). No 1998 Series B
Notes of a principal amount of $1,000 or less shall be redeemed in part. Notice
of redemption shall be mailed by first-class mail at least 30 but not more than
60 days before the redemption date to each holder of 1998 Series B Notes to be
redeemed at its registered address. If any 1998 Series B Note is to be redeemed
in part only, the notice of redemption that relates to such 1998 Series B Note
shall state the portion of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed. A new
note in a principal amount equal to the unredeemed portion thereof will be
issued in the name of the holder thereof upon surrender for cancellation of the
original 1998 Series B Note. Upon giving of a redemption notice, interest on
1998 Series B Notes called for redemption will cease to accrue from and after
the date fixed for redemption (unless the Issuer defaults in providing the funds
for such redemption) and such 1998 Series B Notes will cease to be outstanding.
DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS; ESCROW ACCOUNT
The 1998 Notes are collateralized, pending disbursement pursuant to the
Escrow Agreement dated as of July 7, 1998, among the Issuer, the Trustee and
U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A., as Escrow Agent (the "Escrow Agreement"), by
a pledge of the Escrow Account (as defined in the Escrow Agreement), into which
the Issuer deposited approximately $22.0 million of the net proceeds of the
Offering (the "Escrow Collateral"), representing funds that, together with the
proceeds from the investment thereof, will be sufficient to pay interest on the
1998 Notes for two scheduled interest payments.
87
90
The Issuer entered into the Escrow Agreement pursuant to which the Issuer
granted to the Trustee, for the benefit of the holders of the 1998 Notes and
Existing Senior Notes, a security interest in the Escrow Collateral. All such
security interests collateralize the payment and performance, when due, of all
obligations of the Issuer under the Indenture and the 1998 Notes and the
indenture governing the Existing Senior Notes (the "Existing Senior Notes
Indenture") and Existing Senior Notes on an equal and ratable basis, as provided
in the Escrow Agreement. The liens created by the Escrow Agreement are first
priority security interests in the Escrow Collateral. The ability of holders to
realize upon any such funds or securities may be subject to certain bankruptcy
law limitations in the event of the bankruptcy of the Issuer.
Pursuant to the Escrow Agreement, funds may be disbursed from the Escrow
Account only to pay interest on the 1998 Notes (or, if a portion of the 1998
Notes has been retired by the Issuer, funds representing the lesser of (i) the
excess over the amount sufficient to pay interest through and including July 1,
1999 on the 1998 Notes not so retired and (ii) the interest payments which have
not previously been made on such retired 1998 Notes for each Interest Payment
Date through the Interest Payment Date to occur on July 1, 1999 shall be paid to
the Issuer if no Default then exists under the Indenture).
Pending such disbursements, all funds contained in the Escrow Account have
been invested in U.S. Government Securities. Interest earned on the U.S.
Government Securities will remain in the Escrow Account. Upon the acceleration
of the maturity of the 1998 Notes or the Existing Senior Notes, the Escrow
Agreement provides for the foreclosure by the Escrow Agent upon the net proceeds
of the Escrow Account and pro rata distribution of such foreclosure proceeds to
the Trustee and the trustee under the Existing Senior Notes Indenture for
distribution pursuant to the terms of the Indenture and the Existing Senior
Notes Indenture. Under the terms of the Indenture, the proceeds of the Escrow
Account available to satisfy claims of holders of 1998 Notes shall be applied,
first, to amounts owing to the Trustee in respect of fees and expenses of the
Trustee and, second, to all obligations under the 1998 Notes and the Indenture.
Under the Escrow Agreement, assuming that the Issuer makes the first two
scheduled interest payments on the 1998 Notes in a timely manner with funds or
U.S. Government Securities held in the Escrow Account, all of the U.S.
Government Securities will be released from the Escrow Account.
RANKING
The indebtedness of the Issuer evidenced by the 1998 Series B Notes will
rank senior in right of payment to all subordinated indebtedness of the Issuer
and pari passu in right of payment with all other existing and future
unsubordinated indebtedness of the Issuer, including the 1998 Series A Notes and
the Existing Senior Notes, except to the limited extent the Existing Senior
Notes and the 1998 Series A Notes are, and the 1998 Series B Notes will be
secured by pledged securities in an amount sufficient to provide funds for the
payment of interest for a period of time.
The Issuer is a holding company with limited assets and minimal business
operations of its own. The Issuer operates its business through its
subsidiaries. Any right of the Issuer and its creditors, including holders of
the 1998 Series B Notes, to participate in the assets of any of the Issuer's
subsidiaries upon any liquidation of any such subsidiary will be subject to the
prior claims of the subsidiary's creditors, including trade creditors. For a
discussion of certain adverse consequences of the Issuer being a holding company
and of the terms of potential future indebtedness of the Issuer and its
subsidiaries, see "Risk Factors -- Holding Company Structure and Need to Access
Subsidiaries' Cash Flow."
CERTAIN COVENANTS
Set forth below are certain covenants that are contained in the Indenture.
Limitation on Additional Indebtedness. The Indenture provides that the
Issuer will not, and will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, directly or
indirectly, create, incur, assume, issue, guarantee or in any manner become
directly or indirectly liable for or with respect to, contingently or otherwise,
the payment of (collectively, to "incur") any Indebtedness (including any
Acquired Indebtedness), except for Permitted Indebtedness; provided that (i) the
Issuer will be permitted to incur Indebtedness and (ii) a Restricted Subsidiary
will be permitted to incur Acquired Indebtedness, if, in either case, after
giving pro forma effect to
88
91
such incurrence (including the application of the net proceeds therefrom), the
ratio of (x) Total Consolidated Indebtedness (as of the date of incurrence) to
(y) Annualized Pro Forma Consolidated Operating Cash Flow (based upon the two
most recent fiscal quarters for which consolidated financial statements of the
Issuer are available preceding the date of such incurrence) would be less than
or equal to 6.0 to 1.0.
Limitation on Restricted Payments. The Indenture provides that the Issuer
will not, and will not permit any of the Restricted Subsidiaries to, make,
directly or indirectly, any Restricted Payment unless:
(i) no Default shall have occurred and be continuing at the time of or
upon giving effect to such Restricted Payment;
(ii) immediately after giving effect to such Restricted Payment, the
Issuer would be able to incur $1.00 of Indebtedness under the proviso of
the covenant "Limitation on Additional Indebtedness"; and
(iii) immediately after giving effect to such Restricted Payment, the
aggregate amount of all Restricted Payments declared or made on or after
the Issue Date and all Designation Amounts does not exceed an amount equal
to the sum of (a) the difference between (x) the Cumulative Available Cash
Flow determined at the time of such Restricted Payment and (y) Cumulative
Consolidated Interest Expense determined at the time of such Restricted
Payment, plus (b) the aggregate net cash proceeds received by the Issuer
either (x) as capital contributions to the Issuer after the Issue Date or
(y) from the issue and sale (other than to a Restricted Subsidiary) of its
Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Stock) on or after the Issue Date,
plus (c) the aggregate net proceeds received by the Issuer from the
issuance (other than to a Restricted Subsidiary) on or after the Issue Date
of its Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Stock) upon the conversion
of, or in exchange for, Indebtedness of the Issuer, plus (d) in the case of
the disposition or repayment of any Investment constituting a Restricted
Payment made after the Issue Date (other than an Investment made pursuant
to clause (v), (vi) or (vii) of the following paragraph), an amount equal
to the lesser of the return of capital with respect to such Investment and
the cost of such Investment, in either case, less the cost of the
disposition of such Investment, plus (e) in the case of any Revocation with
respect to a Subsidiary of the Issuer that was made subject to a
Designation after the Issue Date, an amount equal to the lesser of the
Designation Amount with respect to such Subsidiary or the Fair Market Value
of the Investment of the Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries in such
Subsidiary at the time of Revocation, less (f) 50% of the aggregate
principal amount of outstanding Indebtedness included in the calculation of
clause (d) of the definition of Permitted Indebtedness. For purposes of the
preceding clauses (b)(y) and (c), as applicable, and for purposes of the
definition of Total Incremental Invested Equity, the value of the aggregate
net proceeds received by the Issuer upon the issuance of Capital Stock
either upon the conversion of convertible Indebtedness or in exchange for
outstanding Indebtedness or upon the exercise of options, warrants or
rights will be the net cash proceeds received upon the issuance of such
Indebtedness, options, warrants or rights plus the incremental amount
received, if any, by the Issuer upon the conversion, exchange or exercise
thereof.
For purposes of determining the amount expended for Restricted Payments,
cash distributed shall be valued at the face amount thereof and property other
than cash shall be valued at its Fair Market Value.
The provisions of this covenant shall not prohibit (i) the payment of any
dividend or other distribution within 60 days after the date of declaration
thereof if at such date of declaration such payment would be permitted by the
provisions of the Indenture; (ii) the purchase, redemption, retirement or other
acquisition of any shares of Capital Stock of the Issuer in exchange for, or out
of the net cash proceeds of the substantially concurrent issue and sale (other
than to a Restricted Subsidiary) of, shares of Capital Stock of the Issuer
(other than Disqualified Stock); provided that any such net cash proceeds are
excluded from clause (iii)(b) of the preceding paragraph; (iii) so long as no
Default shall have occurred and be continuing, the purchase, redemption,
retirement, defeasance or other acquisition of Subordinated Indebtedness (other
than Deeply Subordinated Shareholder Loans) made by exchange for, or out of the
net cash proceeds of, a substantially concurrent issue and sale (other than to a
Restricted Subsidiary) of (x) Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Stock) of
the Issuer or (y) other Subordinated Indebtedness to the extent that its stated
maturity
89
92
for the payment of principal thereof is not prior to the 180th day after the
final stated maturity of the 1998 Notes; provided that any such net cash
proceeds are excluded from clause (iii)(b) of the preceding paragraph; (iv) the
purchase, redemption, retirement or other acquisition of Deeply Subordinated
Shareholder Loans to the extent made by exchange for (upon conversion in
accordance with their terms or otherwise), or out of the net cash proceeds of, a
substantially concurrent issue and sale (other than to a Restricted Subsidiary)
of Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Stock) of the Issuer; provided that
any such net proceeds or net cash proceeds, as applicable, shall be excluded
from clause (iii)(b) of the preceding paragraph; (v) Investments by the Issuer
or any Restricted Subsidiary in a person (including any Unrestricted Subsidiary)
in an amount, at any time outstanding, not to exceed $50.0 million; (vi) the
extension by the Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries of trade credit to
Unrestricted Subsidiaries, represented by accounts receivable, extended on usual
and customary terms in the ordinary course of business; (vii) any renewal or
reclassification of any Investment in any Unrestricted Subsidiary outstanding on
the Issue Date or subsequently made in accordance with the provisions described
herein; (viii) purchases or redemptions of Capital Stock (including cash
settlements of stock options) held by employees, officers or directors upon or
following termination of their employment with the Issuer or one of its
Subsidiaries, subject to any put arrangements, provided that payments not
subject to such puts shall not exceed $1.0 million in any fiscal year in the
aggregate; (ix) so long as no Default shall have occurred and be continuing,
Investments in Unrestricted Subsidiaries to the extent promptly made with the
proceeds of a substantially concurrent (1) capital contribution to the Issuer or
(2) issue or sale of Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Stock) of the Issuer
(other than to a Restricted Subsidiary); provided that any such proceeds are
excluded from clause (iii)(b) of the preceding paragraph; (x) the payment of
cash in lieu of fractional shares of Capital Stock in connection with any
dividend or other distribution of Capital Stock, any conversion or exchange of
any security for or into shares of Capital Stock or any merger, consolidation or
other reorganization involving the Capital Stock of the Company; and (xi) the
payment of management fees to VPC in an amount not to exceed $350,000 (plus
out-of-pocket travel expenses relating to the management of the Issuer) in any
fiscal year.
In determining the amount of Restricted Payments permissible under this
covenant, amounts expended pursuant to clauses (i), (v), (viii), (x) and, to the
extent not deducted in arriving at Cumulative Available Cash Flow, (xi) above
shall be included as Restricted Payments.
Limitation on Liens Securing Certain Indebtedness. The Issuer will not, and
will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, create, incur, assume or suffer to
exist any Liens of any kind against or upon (i) any property or assets of the
Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary, whether now owned or hereafter acquired, or
any proceeds therefrom, which secure either (x) Subordinated Indebtedness unless
the 1998 Notes are secured by a Lien on such property, assets or proceeds that
is senior in priority to the Liens securing such Subordinated Indebtedness or
(y) Indebtedness of the Issuer that is not Subordinated Indebtedness, unless the
1998 Notes are equally and ratably secured with the Liens securing such other
Indebtedness, except, in the case of clause (x), Permitted Liens described under
clause (k) of the definition thereof and in the case of clause (y), Permitted
Liens or (ii) the Escrow Account.
Limitation on Certain Guarantees and Indebtedness of Restricted
Subsidiaries. The Indenture provides that the Issuer will not permit any
Restricted Subsidiary, directly or indirectly, to assume, guarantee or in any
other manner become liable with respect to (i) any Subordinated Indebtedness or
(ii) any Indebtedness of the Issuer that is not Subordinated Indebtedness (other
than, in the case of this clause (ii), (x) Indebtedness under any Senior Bank
Facility to the extent constituting Permitted Indebtedness or (y) Indebtedness
under any Vendor Credit Facility to the extent constituting Permitted
Indebtedness), unless such Restricted Subsidiary simultaneously executes and
delivers a supplemental indenture providing for the guarantee of payment of the
1998 Notes by such Restricted Subsidiary on a basis senior to any such
Subordinated Indebtedness or pari passu with any such other Indebtedness
referred to in clause (ii), as the case may be. Each guarantee created pursuant
to such provisions is referred to as a "Guarantee" and the issuer of each such
Guarantee, so long as the Guarantee remains outstanding, is referred to as a
"Guarantor."
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of the unconditional release of
any Guarantor from its obligations in respect of the Indebtedness which gave
rise to the requirement that a Guarantee be given, such Guarantor shall be
released from all obligations under its Guarantee. In addition, upon any sale or
disposition
90
93
(by merger or otherwise) of any Guarantor by the Issuer or a Restricted
Subsidiary of the Issuer to any person that is not an Affiliate of the Issuer or
any of its Restricted Subsidiaries which is otherwise in compliance with the
terms of the Indenture and as a result of which such Guarantor ceases to be a
Subsidiary of the Issuer, such Guarantor will be deemed to be released from all
obligations under its Guarantee; provided that each such Guarantor is sold or
disposed of in accordance with the "Disposition of Proceeds of Asset Sales"
covenant.
Change of Control. Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control (the date of
such occurrence being the "Change of Control Date"), the Issuer shall make an
offer to purchase (the "Change of Control Offer"), on a business day (the
"Change of Control Payment Date") not later than 60 days following the Change of
Control Date, all 1998 Series B Notes then outstanding at a purchase price equal
to 101% of the principal amount thereof on any Change of Control Payment Date,
plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to such Change of Control Payment
Date. Notice of a Change of Control Offer shall be given to holders of 1998
Series B Notes, not less than 25 days nor more than 45 days before the Change of
Control Payment Date. The Change of Control Offer is required to remain open for
at least 20 business days and until the close of business on the Change of
Control Payment Date.
Except as described above with respect to a Change of Control, the
Indenture does not contain provisions that permit the holders of the 1998 Series
B Notes to require that the Company repurchase or redeem the 1998 Series B Notes
in the event of a takeover, recapitalization or similar transaction which may be
highly leveraged.
The occurrence of the events constituting a Change of Control under the
Indenture may result in an event of default in respect of other Indebtedness of
the Issuer and its subsidiaries and, consequently, the lenders or holders
thereof may have the right to require repayment of such Indebtedness in full or,
as permitted by the covenant "Limitation on Dividends and Other Payment
Restrictions Affecting Restricted Subsidiaries," to prevent the distribution,
advance or transfer of funds by the Restricted Subsidiaries to the Issuer. See
"Risk Factors -- Holding Company Structure and Need to Access Subsidiaries' Cash
Flow." If a Change of Control Offer is made, there can be no assurance that the
Issuer will have available funds sufficient to pay for all of the 1998 Series B
Notes that might be delivered by holders of 1998 Series B Notes seeking to
accept the Change of Control Offer. The Issuer shall not be required to make a
Change of Control Offer following a Change of Control if a third party makes the
Change of Control Offer in the manner, at the times and otherwise in compliance
with the requirements applicable to a Change of Control Offer made by the Issuer
and purchases all 1998 Series B Notes validly tendered and not withdrawn under
such Change of Control Offer.
If the Issuer is required to make a Change of Control Offer, the Issuer
will comply with all applicable tender offer laws and regulations, including, to
the extent applicable, Section 14(e) and Rule 14e-1 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and any other applicable
securities laws and regulations.
Limitation on Dividends and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting Restricted
Subsidiaries. The Indenture provides that the Issuer will not, and will not
permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, directly or indirectly, create or otherwise
enter into or cause to become effective any consensual encumbrance or
restriction of any kind on the ability of any Restricted Subsidiary to (a) pay
dividends, in cash or otherwise, or make any other distributions on its Capital
Stock or any other interest or participation in, or measured by, its profits to
the extent owned by the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary, (b) pay any
Indebtedness owed to the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary, (c) make any
Investment in the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary or (d) transfer any of its
properties or assets to the Issuer or to any Restricted Subsidiary, except for
(i) any encumbrance or restriction existing on the Issue Date, (ii) any
encumbrance or restriction applicable to a Restricted Subsidiary at the time
that it becomes a Restricted Subsidiary that is not created in contemplation
thereof, (iii) any encumbrance or restriction existing under any agreement that
refinances or replaces an agreement containing a restriction permitted by clause
(i) or (ii) above; provided that the terms and conditions of any such
encumbrance or restriction are not materially less favorable to the holders of
1998 Notes than those under or pursuant to the agreement being replaced or the
agreement evidencing the Indebtedness refinanced, (iv) any encumbrance or
restriction imposed upon a Restricted Subsidiary pursuant to an agreement which
91
94
has been entered into for the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of
the Capital Stock or assets of such Restricted Subsidiary and (v) any customary
encumbrance or restriction applicable to a Restricted Subsidiary that is
contained in an agreement or instrument governing or relating to Indebtedness
contained in any Senior Bank Facility or Vendor Credit Facility; provided that
the provisions of such agreement permit the payment of interest and principal
and mandatory repurchases pursuant to the terms of the Indenture and the 1998
Notes and other indebtedness that is solely an obligation of the Issuer, but
provided further that such agreement may nevertheless contain customary net
worth, leverage, invested capital and other financial covenants, customary
covenants regarding the merger of or sale of all or any substantial part of the
assets of the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary, customary restrictions on
transactions with affiliates, and customary subordination provisions governing
indebtedness owed to the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary.
Disposition of Proceeds of Asset Sales. The Issuer will not, and will not
permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, make any Asset Sale unless (a) the Issuer
or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, receives consideration at the
time of such Asset Sale at least equal to the Fair Market Value of the shares or
assets sold or otherwise disposed of and (b) at least 75% of such consideration
consists of cash or Cash Equivalents; provided that the following shall be
treated as cash for purposes of this covenant: (x) the amount of any liabilities
(other than Subordinated Indebtedness or Indebtedness of a Restricted Subsidiary
that would not constitute Restricted Subsidiary Indebtedness) that are assumed
by the transferee of any such assets pursuant to an agreement that
unconditionally releases the Issuer or such Restricted Subsidiary from further
liability ("assumed liabilities"), (y) the amount of any notes or other
obligations that within 30 days of receipt, are converted into cash (to the
extent of the cash received) and (z) the amount (valued based upon the reported
closing sale price or average of the closing bid and ask prices, as the case may
be, on the principal securities or trading market on the date of the Asset Sale)
of any Publicly Traded Stock received as consideration in such Asset Sale. The
Issuer or the applicable Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, may (i)
apply the Net Cash Proceeds from such Asset Sale within 365 days of the receipt
thereof to repay an amount of Indebtedness (other than Subordinated
Indebtedness) of the Issuer or any Guarantor in an amount not exceeding the
Other Senior Debt Pro Rata Share and elect to permanently reduce the amount of
the commitments thereunder by the amount of the Indebtedness so repaid, (ii)
apply the Net Cash Proceeds from such Asset Sale to repay any Restricted
Subsidiary Indebtedness and elect to permanently reduce the commitments by the
amount of the Indebtedness so repaid or (iii) apply such Net Cash Proceeds
within 365 days thereof, to an investment in properties and assets that will be
used in a Cable/Telecommunications Business (or in Capital Stock and other
securities of any person that will become a Restricted Subsidiary as a result of
such investment to the extent such person owns properties and assets that will
be used in a Cable/ Telecommunications Business) of the Issuer or any Restricted
Subsidiary ("Replacement Assets"). Any Net Cash Proceeds from any Asset Sale
that are neither used to repay, and permanently reduce the commitments under,
any Restricted Subsidiary Indebtedness as set forth in clause (ii) of the
preceding sentence or invested in Replacement Assets within the 365-day period
as set forth in clause (iii) shall constitute "Excess Proceeds." Any Excess
Proceeds not used as set forth in clause (i) of the second preceding sentence
shall constitute "Offer Excess Proceeds" subject to disposition as provided
below.
When the aggregate amount of Offer Excess Proceeds equals or exceeds $10.0
million, the Issuer shall make an offer to purchase (an "Asset Sale Offer"),
from all holders of the 1998 Notes, that aggregate principal amount of 1998
Notes as can be purchased by application of such Offer Excess Proceeds at a
price in cash equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof on any purchase
date, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to any purchase date. Each Asset
Sale Offer shall remain open for a period of 20 business days or such longer
period as may be required by law. To the extent that the principal amount of
1998 Notes tendered pursuant to an Asset Sale Offer is less than the Offer
Excess Proceeds, the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary may use such deficiency
for general corporate purposes. If the principal amount of 1998 Notes validly
tendered and not withdrawn by holders thereof exceeds the amount of 1998 Notes
which can be purchased with the Offer Excess Proceeds, the 1998 Notes to be
purchased will be selected on a pro rata basis. Upon completion of such Asset
Sale Offer, the amount of Offer Excess Proceeds shall be reset to zero.
Notwithstanding the two immediately preceding paragraphs, the Issuer and
the Restricted Subsidiaries will be permitted to consummate an Asset Sale
without complying with such paragraphs to the extent (i) at
92
95
least 75% of the consideration for such Asset Sale constitutes Replacement
Assets, cash or Cash Equivalents (including obligations deemed to be cash under
this covenant) and (ii) such Asset Sale is for Fair Market Value; provided that
any consideration constituting (or deemed to constitute) cash or Cash
Equivalents received by the Issuer or any of the Restricted Subsidiaries in
connection with any Asset Sale permitted to be consummated under this paragraph
shall constitute Net Cash Proceeds subject to the provisions of the two
preceding paragraphs.
If the Issuer is required to make an Asset Sale Offer, the Issuer will
comply with all applicable tender offer rules, including, to the extent
applicable, Section 14(e) and Rule 14e-1 under the Exchange Act, and any other
applicable securities laws and regulations.
Limitation on Issuances and Sales of Preferred Stock by Restricted
Subsidiaries. The Indenture provides that the Issuer (i) will not permit any
Restricted Subsidiary to issue any Preferred Stock (other than to the Issuer or
a Restricted Subsidiary) and (ii) will not permit any person (other than the
Issuer or a Restricted Subsidiary) to own any Preferred Stock of any Restricted
Subsidiary.
Limitation on Transactions with Affiliates. The Indenture provides that the
Issuer will not, and will not permit, cause or suffer any Restricted Subsidiary
to, conduct any business or enter into any transaction (or series of related
transactions which are similar or part of a common plan) with or for the benefit
of any of their respective Affiliates or any beneficial holder of 10% or more of
the Common Stock of the Issuer or any officer or director of the Issuer or any
Restricted Subsidiary (each an "Affiliate Transaction"), unless the terms of the
Affiliate Transaction are fair and reasonable to the Issuer or such Restricted
Subsidiary, as the case may be, and to the extent the Affiliate Transaction
involves aggregate payments or other Fair Market Value involving $250,000 or
more, are set forth in writing. Each Affiliate Transaction (and each series of
related Affiliate Transactions which are similar or part of a common plan)
involving aggregate payments or other Fair Market Value in excess of $500,000
shall be approved by a majority of the Board, such approval to be evidenced by a
Board Resolution stating that the Board has determined that such transaction or
transactions comply with the foregoing provisions. In addition to the foregoing,
each Affiliate Transaction involving aggregate consideration of $5.0 million or
more shall be approved by a majority of the Disinterested Directors; provided
that, in lieu of such approval by the Disinterested Directors, the Issuer may
obtain a written opinion from an Independent Financial Advisor stating that the
terms of such Affiliate Transaction to the Issuer or the Restricted Subsidiary,
as the case may be, are fair from a financial point of view. For purposes of
this covenant, any Affiliate Transaction approved by a majority of the
Disinterested Directors or as to which a written opinion has been obtained from
an Independent Financial Advisor, on the basis set forth in the preceding
sentence, shall be deemed to be on terms that are fair and reasonable to the
Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries, as the case may be, and, therefore,
shall be permitted under this covenant.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the restrictions set forth in this covenant
shall not apply to (i) transactions with or among, or solely for the benefit of,
the Issuer and/or any of the Restricted Subsidiaries, (ii) transactions pursuant
to agreements and arrangements existing on the Issue Date, including payments of
management fees to VPC in an aggregate amount not to exceed $350,000 (plus
travel expenses incurred in providing management services) in any fiscal year of
the Issuer, (iii) the making of Deeply Subordinated Shareholder Loans pursuant
to and in compliance with the covenant "Limitation on Additional Indebtedness,"
(iv) dividends paid by the Issuer pursuant to and in compliance with the
covenant "Limitation on Restricted Payments," (v) customary directors' fees,
indemnification and similar arrangements, consulting fees, employee salaries,
loans and bonuses or legal fees and (vi) transactions contemplated by the
License Co. Documents.
Notwithstanding any provision of the Indenture to the contrary, the Issuer
will not, and will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, amend, modify or
waive any provision of the License Co. Documents in a manner that is adverse,
from the perspective of creditors of the Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries,
in any material respect.
Reports. Whether or not the Issuer has a class of securities registered
under the Exchange Act, the Issuer shall furnish without cost to each holder of
1998 Series B Notes and file with the Trustee and (following the effective date
of the Registered Exchange Offer or Shelf Registration Statement, as applicable)
93
96
file with the SEC (i) within 135 days after the end of each fiscal year of the
Issuer, the information required by Form 10-K (or any successor form thereto)
under the Securities Act, with respect to such period, (ii) within 60 days after
the end of each of the first three fiscal quarters of each fiscal year of the
Issuer, the information required by Form 10-Q (or any successor form thereto)
under the Securities Act with respect to such period and (iii) within 15 days
after it would be required to be filed with the SEC, the information required by
Form 8-K (or any successor form thereto).
Limitation on Designations of Unrestricted Subsidiaries. The Indenture
provides that the Issuer will not designate any Subsidiary of the Issuer (other
than a newly created Subsidiary in which no Investment has previously been made)
as an "Unrestricted Subsidiary" under the Indenture (a "Designation") unless:
(a) no Default shall have occurred and be continuing at the time of or
after giving effect to such Designation;
(b) immediately after giving effect to such Designation, the Issuer
would be able to incur $1.00 of Indebtedness under the proviso of the
covenant "Limitation on Additional Indebtedness"; and
(c) the Issuer would not be prohibited under the Indenture from making
an Investment at the time of Designation (assuming the effectiveness of
such Designation) in an amount (the "Designation Amount") equal to the Fair
Market Value of the net Investment of the Issuer or any other Restricted
Subsidiary in such Restricted Subsidiary on such date.
In the event of any such Designation, the Issuer shall be deemed to have
made an Investment constituting a Restricted Payment pursuant to the covenant
"Limitation on Restricted Payments" for all purposes of the Indenture in the
Designation Amount. The Indenture further provides that neither the Issuer nor
any Restricted Subsidiary shall at any time (x) provide credit support for, or a
guarantee of, any Indebtedness of any Unrestricted Subsidiary (including any
undertaking, agreement or instrument evidencing such Indebtedness); provided
that the Issuer may pledge Capital Stock or Indebtedness of any Unrestricted
Subsidiary on a nonrecourse basis such that the pledgee has no claim whatsoever
against the Issuer other than to obtain such pledged property, (y) be directly
or indirectly liable for any Indebtedness of any Unrestricted Subsidiary or (z)
be directly or indirectly liable for any Indebtedness which provides that the
holder thereof may (upon notice, lapse of time or both) declare a default
thereon or cause the payment thereof to be accelerated or payable prior to its
final scheduled maturity upon the occurrence of a default with respect to any
Indebtedness of any Unrestricted Subsidiary (including any right to take
enforcement action against such Unrestricted Subsidiary), except in the case of
clause (x) or (y) to the extent permitted under the covenants "Limitation on
Restricted Payments" and "Limitation on Transactions with Affiliates."
The Indenture further provides that the Issuer will not revoke any
Designation of a Subsidiary as an Unrestricted Subsidiary (a "Revocation")
unless:
(a) no Default shall have occurred and be continuing at the time of
and after giving effect to such Revocation; and
(b) all Liens and Indebtedness of such Unrestricted Subsidiary
outstanding immediately following such Revocation would, if incurred at
such time, have been permitted to be incurred for all purposes of the
Indenture.
All Designations and Revocations must be evidenced by Board Resolutions
delivered to the Trustee certifying compliance with the foregoing provisions.
CONSOLIDATION, MERGER, SALE OF ASSETS, ETC.
The Indenture provides that the Issuer will not consolidate or combine with
or merge with or into or, directly or indirectly, sell, assign, convey, lease,
transfer or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its properties and
assets to any person or persons in a single transaction or through a series of
transactions, or permit any of the Restricted Subsidiaries to enter into any
such transaction or series of transactions if it would result in the disposition
of all or substantially all of the properties or assets of the Issuer and the
Restricted
94
97
Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, unless (a) the Issuer shall be the
continuing person or, if the Issuer is not the continuing person, the resulting,
surviving or transferee person (the "surviving entity") shall be a company
organized and existing under the laws of the United States or any State or
territory thereof; (b) the surviving entity shall expressly assume all of the
obligations of the Issuer under the 1998 Series B Notes, the Escrow Agreement
and the Indenture, and shall, if required by law to effectuate such assumption,
execute a supplemental indenture to effect such assumption which supplemental
indenture shall be delivered to the Trustee and shall be in form and substance
reasonably satisfactory to the Trustee; (c) immediately after giving effect to
such transaction or series of transactions on a pro forma basis (including,
without limitation, any Indebtedness incurred or anticipated to be incurred in
connection with or in respect of such transaction or series of transactions),
the Issuer or the surviving entity (assuming such surviving entity's assumption
of the Issuer's obligations under the 1998 Series B Notes and the Indenture), as
the case may be, would be able to incur $1.00 of Indebtedness under the proviso
of the covenant "Limitation on Additional Indebtedness"; (d) immediately after
giving effect to such transaction or series of transactions on a pro forma basis
(including, without limitation, any Indebtedness incurred or anticipated to be
incurred in connection with or in respect of such transaction or series of
transactions), no Default shall have occurred and be continuing; and (e) the
Issuer or the surviving entity, as the case may be, shall have delivered to the
Trustee an Officers' Certificate stating that such transaction or series of
transactions, and, if a supplemental indenture is required in connection with
such transaction or series of transactions to effectuate such assumption, such
supplemental indenture complies with this covenant and that all conditions
precedent in the Indenture relating to the transaction or series of transactions
have been satisfied.
Upon any consolidation or merger or any transfer of all or substantially
all of the assets of the Issuer in accordance with the foregoing in which the
Issuer or the Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, is not the continuing
corporation, the successor corporation formed by such a consolidation or into
which the Issuer or such Restricted Subsidiary is merged or to which such
transfer is made, will succeed to, and be substituted for, and may exercise
every right and power of, the Issuer or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case
may be, under the Indenture with the same effect as if such successor
corporation had been named as the Issuer or such Restricted Subsidiary therein;
and thereafter, except in the case of (i) a lease or (ii) any sale, assignment,
conveyance, transfer, lease or other disposition to a Restricted Subsidiary of
the Issuer, the Issuer shall be discharged from all obligations and covenants
under the Indenture and the 1998 Notes.
The Indenture provides that for all purposes of the Indenture and the 1998
Notes (including the provision of this covenant and the covenants "Limitation on
Additional Indebtedness," "Limitation on Restricted Payments" and "Limitation on
Liens"), Subsidiaries of any Surviving Entity will, upon such transaction or
series of related transactions, become Restricted Subsidiaries or Unrestricted
Subsidiaries as provided pursuant to the covenant "Limitation on Designations of
Unrestricted Subsidiaries" and all Indebtedness, and all Liens on property or
assets, of the Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries in existence immediately
prior to such transaction or series of related transactions will be deemed to
have been incurred upon such transaction or series of related transactions.
EVENTS OF DEFAULT
The following are "Events of Default" under the Indenture:
(i) default in the payment of interest on the 1998 Notes when it
becomes due and payable and continuance of such default for a period of 30
days or more (provided such 30 day grace period shall be inapplicable for
the first two interest payments due on the 1998 Notes); or
(ii) default in the payment of the principal of, or premium, if any,
on the 1998 Notes when due; or
(iii) default in the performance, or breach, of any covenant described
under "-- Certain Covenants -- Change of Control", "-- Disposition of
Proceeds of Asset Sales" or "-- Consolidation, Merger, Sale of Assets,
Etc."; or
(iv) default in the performance, or breach, of any covenant in the
Indenture or the Escrow Agreement (other than defaults specified in clause
(i), (ii) or (iii) above), and continuance of such
95
98
default or breach for a period of 30 days or more after written notice to
the Issuer by the Trustee or to the Issuer and the Trustee by the holders
of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding 1998 Notes
(in each case, when such notice is deemed received in accordance with the
Indenture); or
(v) failure to perform any term, covenant, condition or provision of
one or more classes or issues of Indebtedness in an aggregate principal
amount of $5.0 million or more under which the Issuer or a Material
Restricted Subsidiary is obligated, and either (a) such Indebtedness is
already due and payable in full or (b) such failure results in the
acceleration of the maturity of such Indebtedness; provided that, in the
case of a termination or expiration of an Interest Rate Obligation
requiring that the monetary liability thereunder be paid, no Event of
Default shall occur if such payment is made within 30 days after such
payment is due; or
(vi) any holder of at least $5.0 million in aggregate principal amount
of Indebtedness of the Issuer or any Material Restricted Subsidiary shall
commence judicial proceedings or take any other action to foreclose upon,
or dispose of assets of the Issuer or any Material Restricted Subsidiary
having an aggregate Fair Market Value, individually or in the aggregate, of
$5.0 million or more or shall have exercised any right under applicable law
or applicable security documents to take ownership of any such assets in
lieu of foreclosure provided that, in any such case, the Issuer or any
Material Restricted Subsidiary shall not have obtained, prior to any such
foreclosure or disposition of assets, a stay of all such actions that
remains in effect; or
(vii) one or more judgments, orders or decrees for the payment of
money of $5.0 million or more, either individually or in the aggregate,
shall be entered into against the Issuer or any Material Restricted
Subsidiary or any of their respective properties and shall not be
discharged and there shall have been a period of 60 days or more during
which a stay of enforcement of such judgment or order, by reason of pending
appeal or otherwise, shall not be in effect; or
(viii) certain events of bankruptcy, dissolution (in the case of the
Issuer or License Co. only), insolvency, reorganization, administration or
similar proceedings with respect to the Issuer or any Material Restricted
Subsidiary or License Co. shall have occurred; or
(ix) failure by License Co. or its shareholders to perform any
material term, covenant, condition or provision of the License Co.
Documents; or
(x) the Issuer shall assert or acknowledge in writing that the Escrow
Agreement is invalid or unenforceable.
If an Event of Default (other than an Event of Default specified in clause
(viii) above with respect to the Issuer) occurs and is continuing, then the
Trustee or the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the outstanding
1998 Notes may, by written notice, and the Trustee upon the request of the
holders of not less than 25% in principal amount of the outstanding 1998 Notes
shall, declare the principal amount of, premium (if any) on, and any accrued and
unpaid interest on, all outstanding 1998 Notes to be immediately due and payable
and upon any such declaration such amounts shall become immediately due and
payable. If an Event of Default specified in clause (viii) above with respect to
the Issuer occurs and is continuing, then the principal amount of, premium (if
any) on, and any accrued and unpaid interest on, all outstanding 1998 Notes
shall ipso facto become and be immediately due and payable without any
declaration or other act on the part of the Trustee or any holder.
After a declaration of acceleration, the holders of a majority in aggregate
principal amount of outstanding 1998 Notes may, by notice to the Trustee,
rescind such declaration of acceleration if all existing Events of Default,
other than nonpayment of the principal of, premium (if any) on, and any accrued
and unpaid interest on, the 1998 Notes that has become due solely as a result of
such acceleration, have been cured or waived and if the rescission of
acceleration would not conflict with any judgment or decree. The holders of a
majority in principal amount of the outstanding 1998 Notes also have the right
to waive past defaults under the Indenture, except a default in the payment of
principal of, premium (if any) on, or any interest on, any outstanding 1998
96
99
Note, or in respect of a covenant or a provision that cannot be modified or
amended without the consent of all holders of 1998 Notes.
No holder of any of the 1998 Series B Notes has any right to institute any
proceeding with respect to the Indenture or any remedy thereunder, unless the
holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the outstanding 1998 Notes have
made written request, and offered reasonable security or indemnity, to the
Trustee to institute such proceeding as Trustee, the Trustee has failed to
institute such proceeding within 60 days after receipt of such notice and the
Trustee has not within such 60-day period received directions inconsistent with
such written request by holders of a majority in principal amount of the
outstanding 1998 Notes. Such limitations do not apply, however, to a suit
instituted by a holder of a 1998 Note for the enforcement of the payment of the
principal of, premium (if any) on, or any accrued and unpaid interest on, such
1998 Note on or after the respective due dates expressed in such 1998 Note.
During the existence of an Event of Default, the Trustee is required to
exercise such rights and powers vested in it under the Indenture and use the
same degree of care and skill in its exercise thereof as a prudent person would
exercise under the circumstances in the conduct of such person's own affairs.
Subject to the provisions of the Indenture relating to the duties of the
Trustee, if an Event of Default shall occur and be continuing, the Trustee is
not under any obligation to exercise any of its rights or powers under the
Indenture at the request or direction of any of the holders unless such holders
shall have offered to such Trustee reasonable security or indemnity. Subject to
certain provisions concerning the rights of the Trustee, the holders of a
majority in principal amount of the outstanding 1998 Notes have the right to
direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy
available to the Trustee or exercising any trust or power conferred on the
Trustee.
The Indenture provides that the Trustee will, within 60 days after the
occurrence of any Default, give to the holders of the 1998 Series B Notes notice
of such Default known to it, unless such Default shall have been cured or
waived; provided that the Trustee shall be protected in withholding such notice
if it determines in good faith that the withholding of such notice is in the
interest of such holders.
The Issuer is required to furnish to the Trustee annually a statement as to
its compliance with all conditions and covenants under the Indenture.
DEFEASANCE
The Issuer may at any time terminate all of its obligations with respect to
the 1998 Series B Notes ("defeasance"), except for certain obligations,
including those regarding any trust established for a defeasance and obligations
to register the transfer and exchange of the 1998 Series B Notes, to replace
mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen 1998 Series B Notes as required by the
Indenture and to maintain agencies in respect of 1998 Series B Notes. The Issuer
may at any time terminate its obligations under certain covenants set forth in
the Indenture, some of which are described under "-- Certain Covenants" above,
and any omission to comply with such obligations shall not constitute a Default
with respect to the 1998 Series B Notes ("covenant defeasance"). To exercise
either defeasance or covenant defeasance, the Issuer must irrevocably deposit in
trust, for the benefit of the holders of the 1998 Notes, with the Trustee money
(in United States dollars) or U.S. government obligations (denominated in United
States dollars), or a combination thereof, in such amounts as will be sufficient
to pay the principal of, and premium, if any, and interest on the 1998 Notes to
redemption or maturity and comply with certain other conditions, including the
delivery of a legal opinion as to certain tax matters.
SATISFACTION AND DISCHARGE
The Indenture will be discharged and will cease to be of further effect
(except as to surviving rights or registration of transfer or exchange of the
1998 Notes) as to all outstanding 1998 Notes when either (a) all such 1998 Notes
theretofore authenticated and delivered (except lost, stolen or destroyed 1998
Notes that have been replaced or paid and 1998 Notes for whose payment money has
theretofore been deposited in trust or segregated and held in trust by the
Issuer and thereafter repaid to the Issuer or discharged from such trust) have
been delivered to the Trustee for cancellation; or (b)(i) all such 1998 Notes
not theretofore delivered to
97
100
the Trustee for cancellation have become due and payable and the Issuer has
irrevocably deposited or caused to be deposited with the Trustee as trust funds
an amount of money sufficient to pay and discharge the entire indebtedness on
the 1998 Notes not theretofore delivered to the Trustee for cancellation, for
principal amount, premium, if any, and accrued interest to the date of such
deposit; (ii) the Issuer has paid all sums payable by it under the Indenture;
and (iii) the Issuer has delivered irrevocable instructions to the Trustee to
apply the deposited money toward the payment of the 1998 Notes at maturity or on
the redemption date, as the case may be. In addition, the Issuer must deliver an
Officers' Certificate and an Opinion of Counsel stating that all conditions
precedent to satisfaction and discharge have been complied with.
AMENDMENT AND WAIVERS
From time to time, the Issuer, when authorized by resolutions of the Board,
and the Trustee, without the consent of the holders of the 1998 Notes, may
amend, waive or supplement the Indenture or the 1998 Notes for certain specified
purposes, including, among other things, curing ambiguities, defects or
inconsistencies, maintaining the qualification of the Indenture under the Trust
Indenture Act or making any change that does not adversely affect the rights of
any holder. Other amendments and modifications of the Indenture and the 1998
Notes may be made by the Issuer and the Trustee by supplemental indenture with
the consent of the holders of not less than a majority of the aggregate
principal amount of the outstanding 1998 Notes; provided that no such
modification or amendment may, without the consent of the holder of each
outstanding 1998 Note affected thereby, (i) reduce the principal amount of,
extend the fixed maturity of, or alter the redemption provisions of, the 1998
Notes, (ii) change the currency in which any 1998 Notes or any premium or the
accrued interest thereon is payable, (iii) reduce the percentage of the
aggregate principal amount outstanding of 1998 Notes which must consent to an
amendment, supplement or waiver or consent to take any action under the
Indenture or the 1998 Notes, (iv) impair the right to institute suit for the
enforcement of any payment on or with respect to the 1998 Notes, (v) waive a
default in payment with respect to the 1998 Notes, (vi) reduce the rate or
extend the time for payment of interest on the 1998 Notes, (vii) following the
occurrence of a Change of Control or an Asset Sale, alter the Issuer's
obligation to purchase the 1998 Notes in accordance with the Indenture or waive
any default in the performance thereof, (viii) affect the ranking of the 1998
Notes in a manner adverse to the holder of the 1998 Notes, (ix) release any
Guarantee except in compliance with the terms of the Indenture or (x) release
any Liens created by the Escrow Agreement except in strict accordance with the
terms of the Escrow Agreement.
REGARDING THE TRUSTEE AND ESCROW AGENT
U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A. is serving as Trustee under the Indenture
and Escrow Agent under the Escrow Agreement.
GOVERNING LAW
The Indenture and the Escrow Agreement provide that the Indenture and the
1998 Notes and the Escrow Agreement, respectively, will be governed by and
construed in accordance with laws of the State of New York without giving effect
to principles of conflicts of law.
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
Set forth below is a summary of certain defined terms used in the Indenture
or the Escrow Agreement. Reference is made to the Indenture and/or the Escrow
Agreement for the full definition of all such terms, as well as any other
capitalized terms used herein for which no definition is provided.
"Acquired Indebtedness" means Indebtedness of a person existing at the time
such person becomes a Restricted Subsidiary or assumed in connection with an
Asset Acquisition by such person and not incurred in connection with, or in
anticipation of, such person becoming a Restricted Subsidiary or such Asset
Acquisition.
"Affiliate" of any specified person means any other person which, directly
or indirectly, controls, is controlled by or is under direct or indirect common
control with, such specified person. For the purposes of
98
101
this definition, "control" when used with respect to any person means the power
to direct the management and policies of such person, directly or indirectly,
whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise,
and the terms "affiliated," "controlling" and "controlled" have meanings
correlative to the foregoing.
"Annualized Pro Forma Consolidated Coverage" means, as of any date of
determination, the ratio of (1) Annualized Pro Forma Operating Cash Flow to (2)
Consolidated Interest Expense for the four quarter period immediately preceding
the date of determination for which financial statements are available;
provided, that (1) if the Issuer or any of the Restricted Subsidiaries has
incurred any Indebtedness (whether through an Asset Acquisition, Asset Sale or
otherwise) since the beginning of such period and through the date of
determination that remains outstanding or if the transaction or series of
transactions giving rise to the need to calculate such ratio involves an
incurrence of Indebtedness, Consolidated Interest Expense for such period shall
be calculated after giving effect on a pro forma basis to (A) such Indebtedness
as if such Indebtedness had been incurred on the first day of such period
(provided that if such Indebtedness is incurred under a revolving credit
facility (or similar arrangement or under any predecessor revolving credit or
similar arrangement) only that portion of such Indebtedness that constitutes the
one year projected average balance of such Indebtedness (as determined in good
faith by senior management of the Issuer) shall be deemed outstanding for
purposes of this calculation), and (B) the discharge of any other Indebtedness
repaid, repurchased, defeased or otherwise discharged with the proceeds of such
new Indebtedness as if such discharge had occurred on the first day of such
period and (2) if since the beginning of such period any Indebtedness of the
Issuer or any of the Restricted Subsidiaries has been repaid, repurchased,
defeased or otherwise discharged (whether through an Asset Acquisition, Asset
Sale or otherwise) (other than Indebtedness under a revolving credit or similar
arrangement unless such revolving credit Indebtedness has been permanently
repaid and has not been replaced), Consolidated Interest Expense for such period
shall be calculated after giving pro forma effect thereto as if such
Indebtedness had been repaid, repurchased, defeased or otherwise discharged on
the first day of such period.
"Annualized Pro Forma Consolidated Operating Cash Flow" means Consolidated
Operating Cash Flow for the latest two fiscal quarters for which consolidated
financial statements of the Issuer are available multiplied by two. For purposes
of calculating "Consolidated Operating Cash Flow" for any two fiscal quarter
period for purposes of this definition, (i) any Subsidiary of the Issuer that is
a Restricted Subsidiary on the date of the transaction (the "Transaction Date")
giving rise to the need to calculate "Annualized Pro Forma Consolidated
Operating Cash Flow" shall be deemed to have been a Restricted Subsidiary at all
times during such two fiscal quarter period and (ii) any Subsidiary of the
Issuer that is not a Restricted Subsidiary on the Transaction Date shall be
deemed not to have been a Restricted Subsidiary at any time during such two
fiscal quarter period. In addition to and without limitation of the foregoing,
for purposes of this definition, "Consolidated Operating Cash Flow" shall be
calculated after giving effect on a pro forma basis for the applicable two
fiscal quarter period to, without duplication, any Asset Sales or Asset
Acquisitions (including, without limitation, any Asset Acquisition giving rise
to the need to make such calculation as a result of the Issuer or one of the
Restricted Subsidiaries (including any person who becomes a Restricted
Subsidiary as a result of the Asset Acquisition) incurring, assuming or
otherwise being liable for Acquired Indebtedness) occurring during the period
commencing on the first day of such two fiscal quarter period to and including
the Transaction Date (the "Reference Period"), as if such Asset Sale or Asset
Acquisition occurred on the first day of the Reference Period.
"Asset Acquisition" means (i) any capital contribution (by means of
transfers of cash or other property to others or payments for property or
services for the account or use of others, or otherwise) by the Issuer or any
Restricted Subsidiary in any other person, or any acquisition or purchase of
Capital Stock of any other person by the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary, in
either case pursuant to which such person shall become a Restricted Subsidiary
or shall be merged with or into the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary or (ii)
any acquisition by the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary of the assets of any
person which constitute substantially all of an operating unit or line of
business of such person or which is otherwise outside of the ordinary course of
business.
99
102
"Asset Sale" means any direct or indirect sale, conveyance, transfer or
lease (that has the effect of a disposition and is not for security purposes) or
other disposition (that is not for security purposes) to any person other than
the Issuer or a Restricted Subsidiary, in one transaction or a series of related
transactions, of (i) any Capital Stock of any Restricted Subsidiary, (ii) any
material license or other authorization of the Issuer or any Restricted
Subsidiary pertaining to a Cable/Telecommunications Business (other than the
disposition to License Co. of the licenses and authorizations on terms identical
to or at least as favorable to the Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries as
those set forth in the License Co. Documents (provided such new documents shall
also constitute License Co. Documents for all purposes hereunder) so long as the
Issuer or a Restricted Subsidiary has the ability (pursuant to contract or
otherwise) to fully exploit such license or authorization in a
Cable/Telecommunications Business), (iii) any assets of the Issuer or any
Restricted Subsidiary which constitute substantially all of an operating unit or
line of business of the Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries or (iv) any other
property or asset of the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary outside of the
ordinary course of business. For the purposes of this definition, the term
"Asset Sale" shall not include (i) any disposition of properties and assets of
the Issuer that is governed under "-- Consolidation, Merger, Sale of Assets,
Etc." above, (ii) sales of property or equipment that have become worn out,
obsolete or damaged or otherwise unsuitable for use in connection with the
business of the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, and
(iii) for purposes of the covenant "Disposition of Proceeds of Asset Sales," any
sale, conveyance, transfer, lease or other disposition of any property or asset,
whether in one transaction or a series of related transactions occurring within
one year, either (x) involving assets with a Fair Market Value not in excess of
$250,000 or (y) which constitutes the incurrence of a Capitalized Lease
Obligation.
"Average Life to Stated Maturity" means, with respect to any Indebtedness,
as at any date of determination, the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the sum
of the products of (a) the number of years from such date to the date or dates
of each successive scheduled principal payment (including, without limitation,
any sinking fund requirements) of such Indebtedness multiplied by (b) the amount
of each such principal payment by (ii) the sum of all such principal payments;
provided that, in the case of any Capitalized Lease Obligation, all calculations
hereunder shall give effect to any applicable options to renew in favor of the
Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary.
"Board" means the Board of Directors of the Issuer or any duly authorized
committee thereof.
"Board Resolution" means a copy of a resolution certified by the Secretary
or an Assistant Secretary of the Issuer to have been duly adopted by the Board
and to be in full force and effect on the date of such certification, and
delivered to the Trustee.
"Cable/Telecommunications Buildout Costs" means the cost (including the
cost of design, development, site acquisition, construction, integration,
installation, management, manufacture or direct or indirect acquisition (other
than an Asset Acquisition to the extent that it is not an Existing Market Asset
Acquisition)) of properties or assets (tangible or intangible) used or to be
used, directly or indirectly, in a Cable/Telecommunications Business of the
Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary, including, without limitation, the cost of
any Existing Market Asset Acquisition.
"Cable/Telecommunications Business" means any business operating a cable
and/or telephone and/or telecommunications system (delivered by any means,
including, without limitation, cable, microwave, satellite or radio frequency)
in the United States or otherwise delivering or expected to deliver services
over the networks or systems of the Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries
(including, without limitation, any business conducted by the Issuer or any
Restricted Subsidiary on the Issue Date) and any business reasonably related to
the foregoing (including, without limitation, any television programming,
production and/or licensing business and any programming guide or telephone
directory business). Any company holding a license or licenses to conduct any of
the foregoing businesses that is not conducting any material business other than
a Cable/Telecommunications Business shall also be considered a
Cable/Telecommunications Business. A good faith determination by a majority of
the Board as to whether a business meets the requirements of this definition
shall be conclusive, absent manifest error.
"Caisse" means Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec.
100
103
"Capital Stock" means, with respect to any person, any and all shares,
interests, participations, rights in or other equivalents (however designated
and whether voting and/or non-voting) of, such person's capital stock, whether
outstanding on the Issue Date or issued after the Issue Date, and any and all
rights (other than any evidence of Indebtedness), warrants or options
exchangeable for or convertible into such capital stock.
"Capitalized Lease Obligation" means any obligation to pay rent or other
amounts under a lease of (or other agreement conveying the right to use) any
property (whether real, personal or mixed, immovable or movable) that is
required to be classified and accounted for as a capitalized lease obligation
under GAAP, and, for the purpose of the Indenture, the amount of such obligation
at any date shall be the capitalized amount thereof at such date, determined in
accordance with GAAP.
"Cash Equivalents" means (i) any evidence of Indebtedness with a maturity
of 365 days or less issued or directly and fully guaranteed or insured by the
United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof (provided that the full
faith and credit of the United States is pledged in support thereof or such
Indebtedness constitutes a general obligation of such country); (ii) deposits,
certificates of deposit or acceptances with a maturity of 365 days or less of
any financial institution that is a member of the Federal Reserve System, in
each case having combined capital and surplus and undivided profits (or any
similar capital concept) of not less than $500.0 million and whose senior
unsecured debt is rated at least "A-1" by S&P or "P-1" by Moody's; (iii)
commercial paper with a maturity of 365 days or less issued by a corporation
(other than an Affiliate of the Issuer) organized under the laws of the United
States or any State thereof and rated at least "A-1" by S&P or "P-1" by Moody's;
and (iv) repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements relating to
marketable direct obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the United
States Government or issued by any agency thereof and backed by the full faith
and credit of the United States Government maturing within 365 days from the
date of acquisition.
"Change of Control" is defined to mean the occurrence of any of the
following events: (a) any "person" or "group" (as such terms are used in
Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), excluding Permitted Holders, is
or becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under the
Exchange Act, except that a person shall be deemed to have "beneficial
ownership" of all securities that such person has the right to acquire, whether
such right is exercisable immediately or only after the passage of time),
directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the total Voting Stock of the
Issuer; or (b) the Issuer consolidates with, or merges with or into, another
person or sells, assigns, conveys, transfers, leases or otherwise disposes of
all or substantially all of its assets to any person, or any person consolidates
with, or merges with or into, the Issuer, in any such event pursuant to a
transaction in which the outstanding Voting Stock of the Issuer is converted
into or exchanged for cash, securities or other property, other than any such
transaction where (i) the outstanding Voting Stock of the Issuer is converted
into or exchanged for (1) Voting Stock (other than Disqualified Stock) of the
surviving or transferee corporation and/or (2) cash, securities and other
property in an amount which could be paid by the Issuer as a Restricted Payment
under the Indenture and (ii) immediately after such transaction no "person" or
"group" (as such terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange
Act), excluding the Permitted Holders, is the "beneficial owner" (as defined in
Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under the Exchange Act, except that a person shall be
deemed to have "beneficial ownership" of all securities that such person has the
right to acquire, whether such right is exercisable immediately or only after
the passage of time), directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the total
Voting Stock of the surviving or transferee corporation; or (c) during any
consecutive two-year period, individuals who at the beginning of such period
constituted the Board (together with any new directors whose election by the
Board or whose nomination for election by the stockholders of the Issuer was
approved by a Permitted Holder or a vote of a majority of the directors then
still in office who were either directors at the beginning of such period or
whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease for
any reason (other than by action of the Permitted Holders) to constitute a
majority of the Board then in office; provided that (i) to the extent that
either (x) one or more regulatory approvals are required for the consummation of
one or more of the events or circumstances described in clauses (a) through (c)
above to become effective under applicable law or (y) in the good faith judgment
of the Board, one or more regulatory approvals are desirable prior to making one
or more of the events or circumstances described in clauses (a) through (c)
above to become effective under applicable law (provided, in the case of this
clause (y), such approvals
101
104
are sought on a reasonably prompt basis), then such events or circumstances
shall be deemed to have occurred at the time such approvals have been obtained
and become effective under applicable law, and (ii) any event or circumstance
which would constitute a Change of Control solely by reason of the acquisition
of "beneficial ownership" of securities of GVL shall not constitute a Change of
Control with respect to the Issuer, unless it would result in a mandatory
prepayment (by tender offer or otherwise) of Indebtedness, or an event of
default under Indebtedness, of GVL or any of its Subsidiaries (other than the
Issuer and its Subsidiaries). The good faith determination by the Board, based
upon advice of outside counsel, of the beneficial ownership of securities of the
Issuer within the meaning of Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under the Exchange Act shall
be conclusive, absent contrary controlling judicial precedent or contrary
written interpretation published by the SEC.
"Common Stock" means, with respect to any person, any and all shares,
interest or other participations in, and other equivalents (however designated
and whether voting or nonvoting) of such person's common stock whether
outstanding at the Issue Date, and includes, without limitation, all series and
classes of such common stock.
"Consolidated Income Tax Expense" means, with respect to any period, the
provision for United States corporation, local, foreign and other income taxes
of the Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries for such period as determined on a
consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP.
"Consolidated Interest Expense" means without duplication, the sum of (i)
the interest expense of the Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries for such
period as determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP, including,
without limitation, (a) any amortization of debt discount, (b) the net cost
under Interest Rate Obligations (including any amortization of discounts), (c)
the interest portion of any deferred payment obligation, (d) all commissions,
discounts and other fees and charges owed with respect to letters of credit and
bankers' acceptance financing and (e) all accrued interest, (ii) the interest
component of Capitalized Lease Obligations paid, accrued and/or scheduled to be
paid or accrued by the Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries during such period
as determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP and (iii) the
amount of dividends in respect of Disqualified Stock paid by the Issuer and the
Restricted Subsidiaries during such period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no
event shall Consolidated Interest Expense include interest expense arising under
any Deeply Subordinated Shareholder Loans to the extent incurred prior to the
Termination Date.
"Consolidated Net Income" means, with respect to any period, the
consolidated net income of the Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries for such
period, adjusted, to the extent included in calculating such consolidated net
income, by excluding, without duplication, (i) all extraordinary, unusual or
nonrecurring gains or losses of such person (net of fees and expenses relating
to the transaction giving rise thereto) for such period, (ii) income of the
Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries derived from or in respect of all
Investments in persons other than Subsidiaries of the Issuer or any Restricted
Subsidiary, (iii) the portion of net income (or loss) of such person allocable
to minority interests in unconsolidated persons for such period, except to the
extent actually received by the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary, (iv) net
income (or loss) of any other person combined with such person on a "pooling of
interests" basis attributable to any period prior to the date of combination,
(v) any gain or loss, net of taxes, realized by such person upon the termination
of any employee pension benefit plan during such period, (vi) gains or losses in
respect of any Asset Sales (net of fees and expenses relating to the transaction
giving rise thereto) during such period and (vii) except in the case of any
restriction or encumbrance permitted under clause (v) of the covenant
"Limitation on Dividends and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting Restricted
Subsidiaries," the net income of any Restricted Subsidiary for such period to
the extent that the declaration of dividends or similar distributions by that
Restricted Subsidiary of that income is not at the time permitted, directly or
indirectly, by operation of the terms of its charter or any agreement,
instrument, judgment, decree, order, statute, rule or governmental regulations
applicable to that Restricted Subsidiary or its stockholders.
"Consolidated Operating Cash Flow" means, with respect to any period, the
Consolidated Net Income of the Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries for such
period increased, to the extent deducted in arriving at Consolidated Net Income
for such period, by the sum of (i) the Consolidated Income Tax Expense of the
102
105
Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries accrued according to GAAP for such period
(other than taxes attributable to extraordinary gains or losses and gains and
losses from Asset Sales); (ii) Consolidated Interest Expense for such period;
(iii) depreciation of the Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries for such
period; (iv) amortization of the Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries for such
period, including, without limitation, amortization of capitalized debt issuance
costs for such period, all determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with
GAAP; and (v) for purposes of the covenant "Limitation on Additional
Indebtedness" only, other non-cash charges decreasing Consolidated Net Income.
"consolidation" means, with respect to the Issuer, the consolidation of the
accounts of the Restricted Subsidiaries with those of the Issuer, all in
accordance with GAAP; provided that "consolidation" will not include
consolidation of the accounts of any Unrestricted Subsidiary with the accounts
of the Issuer. The term "consolidated" has a correlative meaning to the
foregoing.
"Cumulative Available Cash Flow" means, as at any date of determination,
the positive cumulative Consolidated Operating Cash Flow realized during the
period commencing on the Issue Date and ending on the last day of the most
recent fiscal quarter immediately preceding the date of determination for which
consolidated financial information of the Issuer is available or, if such
cumulative Consolidated Operating Cash Flow for such period is negative, the
amount by which cumulative Consolidated Operating Cash Flow is less than zero.
"Cumulative Consolidated Interest Expense" means, at any date on which a
Restricted Payment is proposed to be made, the sum of the Quarterly Consolidated
Interest Expense Amounts for each quarter after the Issue Date (with the first
quarter commencing on the Issue Date and ending on November 30, 1998) through
the most recent quarter immediately preceding such Restricted Payment for which
consolidated financial statements of the Issuer are available. The "Quarterly
Consolidated Interest Expense Amount" for any quarter (the "Subject Quarter")
will be the product of (a) Consolidated Interest Expense for the Subject Quarter
times (b) the Applicable Percentage for the Subject Quarter, where the
"Applicable Percentage" for the Subject Quarter will be (1) 150% of the
Consolidated Interest Expense of the Issuer for the Subject Quarter if Total
Consolidated Indebtedness for each day of the Subject Quarter is less than 6.0
times the Annualized Pro Forma Consolidated Operating Cash Flow of the Issuer
(based upon the two most recent quarters for which consolidated financial
statements of the Issuer are available immediately preceding the Subject
Quarter) or (2) 200% of the Consolidated Interest Expense of the Issuer for the
Subject Quarter if Total Consolidated Indebtedness for any day of the Subject
Quarter is equal to or greater than 6.0 times the Annualized Pro Forma
Consolidated Operating Cash Flow of the Issuer (based upon the two most recent
quarters for which consolidated financial statements of the Issuer are available
immediately preceding the Subject Quarter).
"Deeply Subordinated Shareholder Loans" means any Indebtedness of the
Issuer for money borrowed from either (x) a Permitted Holder or (y) another
person whose obligations have been guaranteed by a Permitted Holder, provided
such Indebtedness of the Issuer (i) has been expressly subordinated in right of
payment and postponed as to all payments of interest (other than payment-in-kind
interest) and principal to the 1998 Notes, (ii) provides for no payments of
interest (other than payment-in-kind interest) or principal prior to the earlier
of (a) the end of the sixth month after the final maturity of the 1998 Notes and
(b) the indefeasible payment in full in cash of all 1998 Notes (or due provision
therefor which results in the discharge of all Obligations under the Indenture);
provided that the terms of the subordination agreement are in the form annexed
to the Indenture and the Issuer has received one or more Opinions of Counsel as
to the validity and enforceability of such subordination agreement.
"Default" means any event that is, or after notice or passage of time or
both would be, an Event of Default.
"Designation" has the meaning set forth under "-- Certain
Covenants -- Limitation on Designations of Unrestricted Subsidiaries."
"Disinterested Director" means, with respect to any transaction or series
of related transactions, a member of the Board of Directors of the Issuer other
than a director who (i) has any material direct or
103
106
indirect financial interest in or with respect to such transaction or series of
related transactions or (ii) is an employee or officer of the Issuer or an
Affiliate that is itself a party to such transaction or series of transactions
or an Affiliate of a party (other than the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary)
to such transaction or series of related transactions.
"Disqualified Stock" means, with respect to any person, any Capital Stock
which, by its terms (or by the terms of any security into which it is
convertible or for which it is exchangeable), or upon the happening of any
event, matures or is mandatorily redeemable, pursuant to a sinking fund
obligation or otherwise, or is exchangeable for Indebtedness at the option of
the holder thereof, or is redeemable at the option of the holder thereof, in
whole or in part, on or prior to the final maturity date of the 1998 Notes;
provided such Capital Stock shall only constitute Disqualified Stock to the
extent it so matures or is redeemable or exchangeable on or prior to the final
maturity date of the 1998 Notes.
"Equity Offering" means an underwritten public offering of Common Stock of
the Issuer which has been registered under the Securities Act.
"Existing Market Asset Acquisition" means an Asset Acquisition of a
Cable/Telecommunications Business to the extent subscribers or customers are
located in the metropolitan areas of Houston, Texas; Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas;
San Diego, California; Phoenix, Arizona; Chicago, Illinois; Denver, Colorado;
San Francisco, California; Los Angeles, California; Miami-Ft. Lauderdale,
Florida; Tampa, Florida; Austin, Texas; Atlanta, Georgia; Orlando, Florida;
Indianapolis, Indiana; Las Vegas, Nevada; Corpus Christi, Texas; San Antonio,
Texas; Daytona Beach, Florida; Tallahassee, Florida; and greater Washington,
D.C. (it being understood that where a Cable/Telecommunications Business subject
to an Asset Acquisition is conducted in more than one market, an allocation of
Indebtedness being incurred pursuant to clause (c) of the definition of
Permitted Indebtedness may be made on the basis of the latest 12 months of
revenues of the Cable/ Telecommunications Business immediately preceding the
date of incurrence in a particular metropolitan area).
"Existing Senior Credit Facility" means the senior credit agreement dated
as of December 19, 1997, by and among the Issuer, its principal operating
subsidiaries, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as Arranger and Syndication
Agent, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, as Administrative Agent, General
Electric Capital Corporation, as Documentation Agent and the Lenders party
thereto from time to time.
"Existing Senior Notes" means the 13% Senior Notes Due 2005 and the 13%
Senior Notes Due 2005, Series B.
"Fair Market Value" means, with respect to any asset or property, the price
that could be negotiated in an arms-length free market transaction, for cash,
between a willing seller and a willing buyer, neither of whom is under pressure
or compulsion to complete the transaction. Unless otherwise specified in the
Indenture, Fair Market Value shall be determined by the Board acting in good
faith and shall be evidenced by a Board Resolution delivered to the Trustee.
"GAAP" means, at any date of determination, generally accepted accounting
principles in effect in the United States and which are applicable as of the
date of determination and which are consistently applied for all applicable
periods.
"guarantee" means, as applied to any obligation, (i) a guarantee (other
than by endorsement of negotiable instruments for collection in the ordinary
course of business), direct or indirect, in any manner, of any part or all of
such obligation and (ii) an agreement, direct or indirect, contingent or
otherwise, the practical effect of which is to assure in any way the payment or
performance (or payment of damages in the event of non-performance) of all or
any part of such obligation, including, without limiting the foregoing, the
payment of amounts drawn down by letters of credit.
"GVL" means Le Groupe Videotron Ltee.
"Indebtedness" means, with respect to any person, without duplication, (i)
any liability, contingent or otherwise, of such person (A) for borrowed money
(whether or not the recourse of the lender is to the whole of the assets of such
person or only to a portion thereof) or (B) evidenced by a note, debenture or
similar
104
107
instrument or letter of credit (including a purchase money obligation) or (C)
for the payment of money relating to a Capitalized Lease Obligation or other
obligation relating to the deferred purchase price of property or (D) in respect
of an Interest Rate Obligation or currency agreement; or (ii) any liability of
others of the kind described in the preceding clause (i) which the person has
guaranteed or which is otherwise its legal liability; or (iii) any obligation
secured by a Lien (other than (x) Permitted Liens of the type described in
clauses (b), (d) or (e) of the definition of Permitted Liens; provided that the
obligations secured would not constitute Indebtedness under clauses (i) or (ii)
or (iii) of this definition, and (y) Liens on Capital Stock or Indebtedness of
any Unrestricted Subsidiary) to which the property or assets of such person are
subject, whether or not the obligations secured thereby shall have been assumed
by or shall otherwise be such person's legal liability (the amount of such
obligation being deemed to be the lesser of the value of such property or asset
or the amount of the obligation so secured); (iv) all Disqualified Stock valued
at the greater of its voluntary or involuntary maximum fixed repurchase price
plus accrued and unpaid dividends; and (v) any and all deferrals, renewals,
extensions and refundings of, or amendments, modifications or supplements to,
any liability of the kind described in any of the preceding clauses (i), (ii),
(iii) or (iv). In no event shall "Indebtedness" include trade payables and
accrued liabilities that are current liabilities incurred in the ordinary course
of business, excluding the current maturity of any obligation which would
otherwise constitute Indebtedness. For purposes of the covenants "Limitation on
Additional Indebtedness" and "Limitation on Restricted Payments" and the
definition of "Events of Default," in determining the principal amount of any
Indebtedness to be incurred by the Issuer or a Restricted Subsidiary or which is
outstanding at any date, (x) the principal amount of any Indebtedness which
provides that an amount less than the principal amount at maturity thereof shall
be due upon any declaration of acceleration thereof shall be the accreted value
thereof at the date of determination and (y) the principal amount of any
Indebtedness shall be reduced by any amount of cash or Cash Equivalent
collateral securing on a perfected basis, and dedicated for disbursement
exclusively to the payment of principal of and interest on, such Indebtedness.
"Independent Financial Advisor" means a United States investment banking
firm of national standing in the United States (i) which does not, and whose
directors, officers and employees or Affiliates do not have, a direct or
indirect financial interest in the Issuer and (ii) which, in the judgment of the
Board, is otherwise independent and qualified to perform the task for which it
is to be engaged.
"Interest Rate Obligations" means the obligations of any person pursuant to
any arrangement with any other person whereby, directly or indirectly, such
person is entitled to receive from time to time periodic payments calculated by
applying either a floating or a fixed rate of interest on a stated notional
amount and shall include without limitation, interest rate swaps, caps, floors,
collars, forward interest rate agreements and similar agreements.
"Investment" means, with respect to any person, any advance, loan, account
receivable (other than an account receivable arising in the ordinary course of
business), or other extension of credit (including, without limitation, by means
of any guarantee) or any capital contribution to (by means of transfers of
property to others, payments for property or services for the account or use of
others, or otherwise), or any purchase or ownership of any stocks, bonds, notes,
debentures or other securities of, any other person. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, in no event shall any issuance of Capital Stock (other than
Disqualified Stock) of the Issuer in exchange for Capital Stock, property or
assets of another person constitute an Investment by the Issuer in such other
person.
"Issue Date" means July 7, 1998.
"License Co." means Transmission Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
"License Co. Documents" means, collectively, (i) the Assignment Agreement
dated as of February 14, 1997 among TVMAX Telecommunications, Inc. ("TVMAX"),
Sunshine Television Entertainment, Inc., Richey Pacific Cablevision, Inc. and
IRPC Arizona, Inc., as assignors, and License Co., as assignee, (ii) the
Equipment License and Services Agreement dated as of February 14, 1997 between
TVMAX and License Co. and the Promissory Note of License Co. in favor of TVMAX
annexed thereto, (iii) the Option Agreement dated as of February 14, 1997
between TVMAX and License Co., (iv) the Shareholder Option Agreements dated as
of February 14, 1997 between each of Henry Goldberg and Russell S. Berman and
105
108
TVMAX and the Shareholder Option Agreement dated as of September 17, 1997
between Thomas Watson and TVMAX, (v) the Subscription and Shareholders Agreement
dated as of February 14, 1997 and as amended as of the Issue Date among Thomas
Watson, Henry Goldberg and Russell S. Berman (collectively, the "License Co.
Shareholders") and License Co. and (vi) any other agreements identical to the
foregoing in all material respects and entered into for the same purposes that
the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary may enter into in the future, as each of
the foregoing documents referred to in clauses (i) through (v) may be amended,
modified or supplemented in compliance with the covenant "Limitation on
Transactions with Affiliates."
"Lien" means any mortgage, charge, pledge, lien (statutory or other),
security interest, hypothecation, assignment for security, claim, or preference
or priority or other encumbrance upon or with respect to any property of any
kind. A person shall be deemed to own subject to a Lien any property which such
person has acquired or holds subject to the interest of a vendor or lessor under
any conditional sale agreement, capital lease or other title retention
agreement.
"Material Restricted Subsidiary" means any Restricted Subsidiary of the
Issuer, which, at any date of determination, is a "Significant Subsidiary" (as
that term is defined in Regulation S-X issued under the Securities Act), but
shall, in any event, include (x) any Guarantor, (y) TVMAX or (z) any Restricted
Subsidiary of the Issuer which, at any date of determination, is an obligor
under any Indebtedness in an aggregate principal amount equal to or exceeding
$10.0 million if another Material Restricted Subsidiary is also obligated in
respect of such Indebtedness.
"Maturity Date" means, with respect to any 1998 Note, the date specified in
such 1998 Note as the fixed date on which the principal of such 1998 Note is due
and payable.
"Moody's" means Moody's Investors Service.
"Net Cash Proceeds" means, with respect to any Asset Sale, the proceeds
thereof in the form of cash (including assumed liabilities and other items
deemed to be cash under the proviso to the first sentence of the covenant
"Disposition of Proceeds of Asset Sales") or Cash Equivalents including payments
in respect of deferred payment obligations when received in the form of cash or
Cash Equivalents (except to the extent that such obligations are financed or
sold with recourse to the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary) net of (i)
brokerage commissions and other fees and expenses (including fees and expenses
of legal counsel and investment bankers) related to such Asset Sale, (ii)
provisions for all taxes payable as a result of such Asset Sale, (iii) amounts
required to be paid to any person (other than the Issuer or any Restricted
Subsidiary) owning a beneficial interest in or having a Permitted Lien on the
assets subject to the Asset Sale and (iv) appropriate amounts to be provided by
the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, as a reserve
required in accordance with GAAP against any liabilities associated with such
Asset Sale and retained by the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary, as the case
may be, after such Asset Sale, including, without limitation, pension and other
post-employment benefit liabilities, liabilities related to environmental
matters and liabilities under any indemnification obligations associated with
such Asset Sale, all as reflected in an Officers' Certificate delivered to the
Trustee.
"Other Senior Debt Pro Rata Share" means the amount of the applicable
Excess Proceeds obtained by multiplying the amount of such Excess Proceeds by a
fraction, (i) the numerator of which is the aggregate accreted value and/or
principal amount, as the case may be, of all Indebtedness (other than (x) the
1998 Notes and (y) Subordinated Indebtedness) of the Issuer outstanding at the
time of the applicable Asset Sale with respect to which the Issuer is required
to use Excess Proceeds to repay or make an offer to purchase or repay and (ii)
the denominator of which is the sum of (a) the aggregate principal amount of all
1998 Notes outstanding at the time of the applicable Asset Sale and (b) the
aggregate principal amount or the aggregate accreted value, as the case may be,
of all other Indebtedness (other than Subordinated Indebtedness) of the Issuer
outstanding at the time of the applicable Asset Sale Offer with respect to which
the Issuer is required to use the applicable Excess Proceeds to offer to repay
or make an offer to purchase or repay.
"Permitted Holder" means (i) any of GVL, Caisse or any of their respective
controlled Affiliates, (ii) a Strategic Equity Investor that, prior to August
31, 1999, invests on a primary basis in Capital Stock (other
106
109
than Disqualified Stock) representing not less than 15% of the fully diluted
Common Stock of the Issuer at the time of issuance by the Issuer; provided that
only the first such Strategic Equity Investor shall be a Permitted Holder, or
(iii) Andre Chagnon, his spouse or any of his lineal descendants and their
respective spouses (collectively, the "Chagnon Family"), whether acting in their
own name or as one or as a majority of persons having the power to exercise the
voting rights attached to, or having investment power over, shares of Capital
Stock held by others, or (iv) any controlled Affiliate of any member of the
Chagnon Family or (v) any trust principally for the benefit of one or more
members of the Chagnon Family (whether or not any member of the Chagnon Family
is a trustee of such trust) or (vi) any charitable foundation a majority of
whose members, trustees or directors, as the case may be, are persons referred
to in (iii) above. For purposes of this definition, "lineal descendant" shall
include at any time any person that is treated as being adopted or is in the
process of being adopted by any member of the Chagnon Family at such time.
"Permitted Indebtedness" means the following Indebtedness (each of which
shall be given independent effect):
(a) Indebtedness under the 1998 Notes and the Indenture;
(b) Indebtedness of the Issuer and/or any Restricted Subsidiary (other
than under the Existing Senior Credit Facility) outstanding on the Issue
Date, including the Existing Senior Notes;
(c) Indebtedness, including under any Senior Bank Facility or Vendor
Credit Facility, of the Issuer and/or any Restricted Subsidiary to the
extent that the proceeds of such Indebtedness are used to finance
Cable/Telecommunications Buildout Costs of the Issuer or any of the
Restricted Subsidiaries; provided that, to the extent that any such
incurrence of Indebtedness is not pursuant to a Vendor Credit Facility, the
aggregate principal amount of such incurred Indebtedness shall not exceed
80% of the Cable/ Telecommunications Buildout Costs being financed with the
proceeds thereof;
(d) Indebtedness of the Issuer such that, after giving effect to the
incurrence thereof, the total aggregate principal amount of Indebtedness
incurred under this clause (d) and any Refinancing thereof (whether initial
or successive) incurred pursuant to and otherwise incurred in compliance
with the Indenture would not exceed 200% of Total Incremental Invested
Equity;
(e) Indebtedness of the Issuer and/or any Restricted Subsidiary under
any Senior Bank Facility in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$150.0 million at any time outstanding;
(f) (i) Indebtedness of any Restricted Subsidiary owed to and held by
the Issuer or a Restricted Subsidiary and (ii) Indebtedness of the Issuer
owed to and held by any Restricted Subsidiary; provided that an incurrence
of Indebtedness shall be deemed to have occurred upon (x) any sale or other
disposition (excluding assignments as security to financial institutions)
of any Indebtedness of the Issuer or a Restricted Subsidiary referred to in
this clause (f) to a person (other than the Issuer or a Restricted
Subsidiary) or (y) any sale or other disposition of Capital Stock of a
Restricted Subsidiary, or Designation of a Restricted Subsidiary, which
holds Indebtedness of the Issuer or another Restricted Subsidiary such that
such Restricted Subsidiary, in any such case, ceases to be a Restricted
Subsidiary;
(g) Interest Rate Obligations of the Issuer and/or any Restricted
Subsidiary relating to (i) Indebtedness of the Issuer and/or such
Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be (which Indebtedness (x) bears
interest at fluctuating interest rates and (y) is otherwise permitted to be
incurred under the "Limitation on Additional Indebtedness" covenant),
and/or (ii) Indebtedness (which Indebtedness would bear interest at
fluctuating interest rates) for which a lender has provided a commitment
(subject to customary conditions) in an amount reasonably anticipated to be
incurred by the Issuer and/or a Restricted Subsidiary in the following 12
months after such Interest Rate Obligation has been incurred, but only to
the extent, in the case of either subclause (i) or (ii), that the notional
principal amount of such Interest Rate Obligations does not exceed the
principal amount of the Indebtedness (and/or Indebtedness subject to
commitments) to which such Interest Rate Obligations relate;
107
110
(h) Indebtedness of the Issuer and/or any Restricted Subsidiary in
respect of performance bonds of the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary or
surety bonds provided by the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary incurred
in the ordinary course of business in connection with the construction,
implementation or operation of a Cable/Telecommunications Business;
(i) Indebtedness of the Issuer and/or any Restricted Subsidiary to the
extent it represents a replacement, renewal, refinancing or extension (a
"Refinancing") of outstanding Indebtedness of the Issuer and/or of any
Restricted Subsidiary incurred or outstanding pursuant to clause (a), (b),
(c) or (d) of this definition or the proviso of the covenant "Limitation on
Additional Indebtedness"; provided that (1) Indebtedness of the Issuer may
not be Refinanced to such extent under this clause (i) with Indebtedness of
any Restricted Subsidiary and (2) any such Refinancing shall only be
permitted under this clause (i) to the extent that (x) it does not result
in a lower Average Life to Stated Maturity of such Indebtedness as compared
with the Indebtedness being Refinanced and (y) it does not exceed the sum
of the principal amount (or, if such Indebtedness provides for a lesser
amount to be due and payable upon a declaration of acceleration thereof, an
amount no greater than such lesser amount) of the Indebtedness being
Refinanced plus the amount of accrued interest thereon and the amount of
any reasonably determined prepayment premium necessary to accomplish such
Refinancing and such reasonable fees and expenses incurred in connection
therewith;
(j) Indebtedness of the Issuer under Deeply Subordinated Shareholder
Loans to the extent incurred prior to the Termination Date; and
(k) in addition to the items referred to in clauses (a) through (j)
above, Indebtedness of the Issuer and any Acquired Indebtedness of any
Restricted Subsidiary having an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$50.0 million at any time outstanding.
"Permitted Investments" means (a) Cash Equivalents; (b) Investments in
prepaid expenses, negotiable instruments held for collection and lease, utility
and workers' compensation, performance and other similar deposits; (c) loans and
advances to employees made in the ordinary course of business; (d) Interest Rate
Obligations; (e) bonds, notes, debentures or other securities received as a
result of Asset Sales pursuant to and in compliance with the covenant
"Disposition of Proceeds of Asset Sales"; (f) Investments made in the ordinary
course of business as partial payment for constructing a network relating
principally to a Cable/ Telecommunications Business; (g) Investments in License
Co. contemplated by the License Co. Documents; and (h) Investments in companies
owning or managing multiple dwelling units (or an Affiliate thereof) with which
the Issuer or any Restricted Subsidiary have Rights of Entry in the ordinary
course of business in lieu of (in whole or in part) other customary financial
inducements to property owners.
"Permitted Liens" means (a) Liens on property of a person existing at the
time such person is merged into or consolidated with the Issuer or any
Restricted Subsidiary or becomes a Restricted Subsidiary; provided that such
Liens were in existence prior to the contemplation of such merger, consolidation
or acquisition and do not secure any property or assets of the Issuer or any
Restricted Subsidiary other than the property or assets subject to the Liens
prior to such merger or consolidation; (b) Liens imposed by law, such as
carriers', warehousemen's and mechanics' Liens and other similar Liens arising
in the ordinary course of business which secure payment of obligations not more
than 60 days past due or are being contested in good faith and by appropriate
proceedings; (c) Liens existing on the Issue Date; (d) Liens for taxes,
assessments or governmental charges or claims that are not yet delinquent or
that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings promptly
instituted and diligently conducted; provided that any reserve or other
appropriate provision as shall be required in conformity with GAAP shall have
been made therefor; (e) easements, rights of way, restrictions and other similar
easements, licenses, restrictions on the use of properties, or minor
imperfections of title that, in the aggregate, are not material in amount and do
not in any case materially detract from the properties subject thereto or
interfere with the ordinary conduct of the business of the Issuer or the
Restricted Subsidiaries; (f) Liens to secure the performance of statutory
obligations, surety or appeal bonds, performance bonds or other obligations of a
like nature incurred in the ordinary course of business; (g) Liens securing any
Senior Bank Facility or Vendor Credit Facility to the extent it would constitute
"Permitted Indebtedness"; (h) Liens to secure any Refinancing of any
Indebtedness
108
111
secured by Liens referred to in the clauses (a), (c) or (j) of this definition,
but only to the extent that such Liens do not extend to any other property or
assets and the principal amount of the Indebtedness secured by such Liens is not
increased; (i) Liens to secure the 1998 Notes and the Existing Senior Notes; (j)
Liens on real property incurred in connection with the financing of the purchase
of such real property (or incurred within 60 days of purchase) by the Issuer or
any Restricted Subsidiary; and (k) Liens on the proceeds of Indebtedness to
secure the payment of principal and interest on such Indebtedness and the
Existing Senior Notes.
"Preferred Stock" means, with respect to any person, any and all shares,
interests, participations or other equivalents (however designated) of such
person's preferred or preference stock whether now outstanding, or issued after
the Issue Date, and including, without limitation, all classes and series of
preferred or preference stock of such person.
"Publicly Traded Stock" means any Common Stock of an issuer that is listed
and traded on either the New York Stock Exchange or the American Stock Exchange
or the Nasdaq National Market System.
"Refinancing" has the meaning set forth in clause (i) of the definition of
"Permitted Indebtedness."
"Restricted Payment" means any of the following: (i) the declaration or
payment of any dividend or any other distribution on Capital Stock of the Issuer
or any payment made to the direct or indirect holders (in their capacities as
such) of Capital Stock of the Issuer (other than dividends or distributions
payable solely in Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Stock) of the Issuer or
in options, warrants or other rights to purchase Capital Stock (other than
Disqualified Stock) of the Issuer); (ii) the purchase, redemption or other
acquisition or retirement for value of any Capital Stock of the Issuer (other
than any such Capital Stock owned by the Issuer or a Restricted Subsidiary);
(iii) the purchase, redemption, defeasance or other acquisition or retirement
for value of any Subordinated Indebtedness (other than any Subordinated
Indebtedness held by a Restricted Subsidiary); (iv) the making of any payment
(whether of principal or interest (other than the payment of interest in the
form of additional Deeply Subordinated Shareholder Loans)) in respect of the
Deeply Subordinated Shareholder Loans; or (v) the making of any Investment
(other than a Permitted Investment) in any person (other than an Investment by a
Restricted Subsidiary in the Issuer or an Investment by the Issuer or a
Restricted Subsidiary in either (x) a Restricted Subsidiary engaged principally
in a Cable/Telecommunications Business or (y) a person engaged principally in a
Cable/ Telecommunications Business that becomes a Restricted Subsidiary as a
result of such Investment).
"Restricted Subsidiary" means any Subsidiary of the Issuer that has not
been designated by the Board, by a Board Resolution delivered to the Trustee, as
an Unrestricted Subsidiary pursuant to and in compliance with the covenant
"Limitation on Designations of Unrestricted Subsidiaries." Any such designation
may be revoked by a Board Resolution delivered to the Trustee, subject to the
provisions of such covenant.
"Restricted Subsidiary Indebtedness" means Indebtedness of any Restricted
Subsidiary (i) which is not subordinated to any other Indebtedness of such
Restricted Subsidiary and (ii) in respect of which the Issuer is not also
obligated (by means of a guarantee or otherwise) other than, in the case of this
clause (ii), Indebtedness under any Senior Bank Facility or Vendor Credit
Facility to the extent constituting "Permitted Indebtedness."
"Revocation" has the meaning set forth under "-- Certain
Covenants -- Limitation on Designations of Unrestricted Subsidiaries."
"S&P" means Standard & Poor's Corporation.
"Senior Bank Facility" means any senior commercial term loan and/or
revolving credit facility (including any letter of credit subfacility) entered
into principally with commercial banks and/or other financial institutions
typically party to commercial loan agreements.
"Strategic Equity Investor" means (i) any company (other than GVL and its
affiliates) which is engaged principally in a Cable/Telecommunications Business
and which has a rating from Moody's of Baa3 (or the equivalent thereof) or
higher or from S&P of BBB- (or the equivalent thereof) or higher or (ii) any
controlled Affiliate of any company referred to in the preceding clause (i).
109
112
"Subordinated Indebtedness" means any Indebtedness of the Issuer or any
Guarantor which is expressly subordinated in right of payment to any other
Indebtedness of the Issuer or such Guarantor.
"Subsidiary" means, with respect to any person, (i) any corporation of
which the outstanding Capital Stock having at least a majority of the votes
entitled to be cast in the election of directors shall at the time be owned,
directly or indirectly, by such person, or (ii) any other person of which at
least a majority of voting interest is at the time, directly or indirectly,
owned by such person.
"Termination Date" means the earlier to occur of (i) July 31, 1999 and (ii)
an Equity Offering.
"Total Consolidated Indebtedness" means, at any date of determination, an
amount equal to the aggregate amount of all Indebtedness of the Issuer and the
Restricted Subsidiaries outstanding as of the date of determination, provided
that Total Consolidated Indebtedness shall exclude any Deeply Subordinated
Shareholder Loans to the extent incurred prior to the Termination Date.
"Total Incremental Invested Equity" means, at any date of determination,
the sum of, without duplication, (a) the aggregate cash proceeds or Fair Market
Value of non-cash consideration received by the Issuer either (x) as cash
capital contributions to the Issuer after the Issue Date or (y) from the issue
and sale (other than to a Restricted Subsidiary) of its Capital Stock (other
than Disqualified Stock) on or after the Issue Date for cash or to effect an
Asset Acquisition, plus (b) the aggregate net proceeds received by the Issuer
from the issuance (other than to a Restricted Subsidiary) on or after the Issue
Date of its Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Stock) upon the conversion
of, or in exchange for, indebtedness of the Issuer, minus (c) the aggregate
amount of all Restricted Payments made on or after the Issue Date and all
Designation Amounts arising after the Issue Date, but only to the extent the
amount set forth in this clause (c) would exceed the amount determined under
subclause (a) of clause (iii) of the first paragraph under the "Limitation on
Restricted Payments" covenant, plus (d) in the case of the disposition or
repayment of any Investment which has been deducted pursuant to clause (c) of
this definition, an amount equal to the return of capital with respect to such
Investment and the cost of such Investment, plus (e) in the case of any
Revocation with respect to any Subsidiary that was made the subject of a
Designation after the Issue Date and as to which a Designation Amount has been
deducted pursuant to clause (c) of this definition, an amount equal to the
lesser of such Designation Amount or the Fair Market Value of the Investment of
the Issuer and the Restricted Subsidiaries in such Subsidiary at the time of
Revocation.
"Unrestricted Subsidiary" means any Subsidiary of the Issuer designated as
such pursuant to and in compliance with the covenant "Limitation on Designations
of Unrestricted Subsidiaries." Any such designation may be revoked by a Board
Resolution delivered to the Trustee, subject to the provisions of such covenant.
"U.S. Government Securities" means securities that are direct obligations
of the United States of America for the payment of which its full faith and
credit is pledged.
"Vendor Credit Facility" means, collectively, any credit facility entered
into with any vendor or supplier (or any financial institution acting on behalf
of or for the purpose of directly financing purchases from such vendor or
supplier) to the extent the Indebtedness thereunder is incurred for the purpose
of financing the cost (including the cost of design, development, site
acquisition, construction, integration, installation, management, manufacture or
acquisition) of personal property (tangible or intangible) used, or to be used,
in a Cable/Telecommunications Business.
"VPC" means VPC Corporation.
110
113
EXCHANGE OFFER; REGISTRATION RIGHTS
Pursuant to the Registration Agreement, the Issuer agreed with the Initial
Purchasers, for the benefit of the holders of the 1998 Notes, that the Issuer
will, at its cost, (i) no later than 75 days after the Issue Date file the
registration statement of which this Prospectus is a part (the "Exchange Offer
Registration Statement") with the Commission with respect to a registered offer
to exchange the 1998 Series A Notes for the 1998 Series B Notes, such 1998
Series B Notes having terms substantially identical in all material respects to
the 1998 Series A Notes (except that the 1998 Series B Notes will not contain
terms with respect to transfer restrictions) and (ii) use its best efforts to
cause the Exchange Offer Registration Statement to be declared effective under
the Securities Act no later than 135 days after the Issue Date. Upon the
effectiveness of the Exchange Offer Registration Statement, the Issuer will
promptly offer the 1998 Series B Notes in exchange for surrender of the 1998
Series A Notes (the "Registered Exchange Offer"). The Issuer will keep the
Registered Exchange Offer open for no less than 30 days (or longer if required
by applicable law) after the date notice of the Registered Exchange Offer is
mailed to the holders of the 1998 Series A Notes. For each 1998 Series A Note
surrendered to the Issuer pursuant to the Registered Exchange Offer, the holder
of such 1998 Series A Note will receive a 1998 Series B Note having a principal
amount equal to that of the surrendered 1998 Series A Note. Interest on each
1998 Series B Note will accrue from the last interest payment date on which
interest was paid on the 1998 Series A Note surrendered in exchange therefor or,
if no interest has been paid on such 1998 Series A Note, from the date of its
original issue. Under existing Commission interpretations, the 1998 Series B
Notes will be freely transferable by holders other than affiliates of the Issuer
after the Registered Exchange Offer without further registration under the
Securities Act if the holder of the 1998 Series B Notes represents that it is
acquiring the 1998 Series B Notes in the ordinary course of its business, that
it has no arrangement or understanding with any person to participate in the
distribution of the 1998 Series B Notes and that it is not an affiliate of the
Issuer, as such terms are interpreted by the Commission; provided that
broker-dealers ("Participating Broker-Dealers") receiving 1998 Series B Notes in
the Registered Exchange Offer will have a prospectus delivery requirement with
respect to resales of such 1998 Series B Notes. The Commission has taken the
position that Participating Brokers-Dealers may fulfill their prospectus
delivery requirements with respect to 1998 Series B Notes (other than a resale
of an unsold allotment from the original sale of the 1998 Series A Notes) with
the prospectus contained in the Exchange Offer Registration Statement. Under the
Registration Agreement, the Issuer is required to allow Participating
Broker-Dealers and other persons, if any, with similar prospectus delivery
requirements to use the prospectus contained in the Exchange Offer Registration
Statement in connection with the resale of such 1998 Series B Notes for a
specified period of time.
A holder of 1998 Series A Notes (other than certain specified holders of
1998 Series A Notes) who wishes to exchange such 1998 Series A Notes for 1998
Series B Notes in the registered Exchange Offer will be required to represent
that any 1998 Series B Notes to be received by it will be acquired in the
ordinary course of its business and that at the time of the commencement of the
Registered Exchange Offer it has no arrangement or understanding with any person
to participate in the distribution (within the meaning of the Securities Act) of
the 1998 Series B Notes and that is not an "affiliate" of the Company, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act, or if it is an affiliate, that it
will comply with the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the
Securities Act to the extent applicable.
In the event that applicable interpretations of the staff of the SEC do not
permit the Issuer to effect such a Registered Exchange Offer, or if for any
other reason the Registered Exchange Offer is not consummated within 165 days
after the Issue Date, or if the Initial Purchasers so request with respect to
1998 Series A Notes not eligible to be exchanged for 1998 Series B Notes in the
Registered Exchange Offer, or if any holder of 1998 Series A Notes is not
eligible to participate in the Registered Exchange Offer or participates in but
does not receive freely tradeable (except for prospectus delivery requirements)
1998 Series B Notes in the Registered Exchange Offer, the Issuer will, at its
cost, (a) as promptly as practicable, file a shelf registration statement (the
"Shelf Registration Statement") covering resales of the 1998 Series A Notes or
the 1998 Series B Notes, as the case may be, (b) use its best efforts to cause
the Shelf Registration Statement to be declared effective under the Securities
Act by the 180th day after the Issue Date and (c) keep the Shelf Registration
Statement effective until two years after its effective date (or such shorter
period that will
111
114
terminate when all 1998 Series A Notes or 1998 Series B Notes, as the case may
be, covered by the Shelf Registration Statement have been sold pursuant to the
Shelf Registration Statement). The Issuer will, in the event a Shelf
Registration Statement is filed, among other things, provide to each holder for
whom such Shelf Registration Statement was filed copies of the prospectus which
is a part of the Shelf Registration Statement, notify each such holder when the
Shelf Registration Statement has become effective and take certain other actions
as are required to permit unrestricted resales of the 1998 Series A Notes or the
1998 Series B Notes, as the case may be. A holder selling such 1998 Series A
Notes or 1998 Series B Notes pursuant to the Shelf Registration Statement
generally would be required to be named as a selling security holder in the
related prospectus and to deliver a prospectus to purchasers, will be subject to
certain of the civil liability provisions under the Securities Act in connection
with such sales and will be bound by the provisions of the Registration
Agreement which are applicable to such holder (including certain indemnification
obligations).
If (i) within 75 days after the Issue Date, neither the Exchange Offer
Registration Statement nor the Shelf Registration Statement has been filed with
the Commission; (ii) within 135 days after the Issue Date the Exchange Offer
Registration Statement has not been declared effective, unless the applicable
interpretations of the Commission do not permit the Issuer to effect a
Registered Exchange Offer; (iii) within 165 days after the Issue Date, the
Registered Exchange Offer has not been consummated, unless the applicable
interpretations of the Commission do not permit the Issuer to effect a
Registered Exchange Offer; (iv) within 180 days after the Issue Date, the Shelf
Registration Statement has not been declared effective, if the Registered
Exchange Offer has not been consummated or the Issuer is otherwise obligated to
file a Shelf Registration Statement; or (v) after either the Exchange Offer
Registration Statement or the Shelf Registration Statement has been declared
effective such Registration Statement thereafter ceases to be effective or
usable (subject to certain exceptions) in connection with resales of 1998 Series
A Notes or 1998 Series B Notes in accordance with and during the periods
specified in the Registration Agreement (each such event referred to in clauses
(i) through (v), a "Registration Default"), additional interest ("Liquidated
Damages") will accrue on the 1998 Series A Notes and the 1998 Series B Notes (in
addition to the stated interest on the 1998 Series A Notes and the 1998 Series B
Notes) from and including the date on which any such Registration Default shall
occur but excluding the date on which all Registration Defaults have been cured.
Liquidated Damages, if any, will be payable in cash semi-annually in arrears
each January 1 and July 1, commencing January 1, 1999, at a rate per annum equal
to 0.50% of the principal amount of the 1998 Notes during the 90-day period
immediately following the occurrence of any Registration Default and shall
increase by 0.25% per annum of the principal amount of the 1998 Notes at the end
of each subsequent 90-day period, but in no event shall such rate exceed 2.00%
per annum in the aggregate regardless of the number of Registration Defaults.
The summary herein of certain provisions of the Registration Agreement does
not purport to be complete and is subject to and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to all the provisions of the Registration Agreement, has been filed as
an exhibit hereto.
112
115
BOOK-ENTRY; DELIVERY AND FORM
Except as set forth in the next paragraph, the 1998 Series B Notes will be
issued in the form of one or more registered notes in global form (the "New
Global Note," together with the global note representing the 1998 Series A
Notes, the "Global Note"). On the Exchange Date, the New Global Note will be
deposited with, or on behalf of, The Depository Trust Company ("DTC") and
registered in the name of the nominee of the DTC.
The 1998 Notes that are issued as described below under "-- Certificated
Securities" will be issued in the form of registered definitive certificates
("Certificated Securities"). Upon the transfer of such Certificated Securities,
such Certificated Securities may, unless the applicable Global Note has
previously been exchanged in whole for Certificated Securities, be exchanged for
an interest in the Global Note representing the principal amount of 1998 Notes
being transferred.
The Global Note. The Issuer expects that pursuant to procedures established
by DTC (a) upon deposit of the Global Note, DTC or its custodian will credit on
its internal system portions of the Global Note to the respective accounts of
persons who have accounts with such depositary and (b) ownership of the 1998
Notes will be shown on, and the transfer of ownership thereof will be effected
only through, records maintained by DTC or its nominee (with respect to
interests of Participants (as defined below) and the records of Participants
(with respect to interests of persons other than Participants)). Such accounts
initially will be designated by or on behalf of the Initial Purchasers and
ownership of beneficial interests in the Global Note will be limited to persons
who have accounts with DTC ("Participants") or persons who hold interests
through Participants. Qualified Institutional Buyers may hold their interests in
the Global Note through DTC if they are Participants in such system, or
indirectly through organizations which are Participants in such system.
So long as DTC or its nominee is the registered owner or holder of any of
the 1998 Notes, DTC or such nominee will be considered the sole owner or holder
of such 1998 Notes represented by such Global Note for all purposes under the
Indenture.
Payments of the principal of or premium and interest (including Liquidated
Damages) on the 1998 Notes represented by the Global Note will be made to DTC or
its nominee, as the case may be, as the registered owner thereof. None of the
Issuer, the Trustee or any paying agent under the Indenture will have any
responsibility or liability for any aspect of the records relating to or
payments made on account of beneficial ownership interests in the Global Note or
for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to such
beneficial ownership interest.
The Issuer expects that DTC or its nominee, upon receipt of any payment of
the principal of or premium and interest (including Liquidated Damages) on the
Global Notes will credit Participants' accounts with payments in amounts
proportionate to their respective beneficial interests in the Global Note as
shown on the records of DTC or its nominee. The Issuer also expects that
payments by Participants to owners of beneficial interests in the Global Note
held through such Participants will be governed by standing instructions and
customary practice as is now the case with securities held for the accounts of
customers registered in the names of nominees for such customers. Such payment
will be the responsibility of such Participants.
Transfers between Participants in DTC will be effected in accordance with
DTC rules and will be settled in immediately available funds. If a holder
requires physical delivery of a Certificated Security for any reason, including
to sell 1998 Notes to persons in states which require physical delivery of such
securities or to pledge such securities, such holder must transfer its interest
in the Global Note in accordance with the normal procedures of DTC and in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the Indenture.
DTC has advised the Issuer that DTC will take any action permitted to be
taken by a holder of 1998 Notes (including the presentation of 1998 Notes for
exchange as described below) only at the direction of one or more Participants
to whose account the interests in the Global Note are credited and only in
respect of the aggregate principal amount as to which such Participants have
given such direction. However, if there is an Event of Default under the
Indenture, DTC will exchange the Global Note for Certificated Securities.
113
116
DTC has advised the Issuer as follows: DTC is a limited purpose trust
company organized under the laws of the State of New York, a member of the
Federal Reserve System, a "clearing corporation" within the meaning of the
Uniform Commercial Code and a "clearing agency" registered pursuant to the
provisions of Section 17A of the Exchange Act. DTC was created to hold
securities for its Participants and facilitate the clearance and settlement of
securities transactions between Participants through electronic book-entry
changes in accounts of its Participants, thereby eliminating the need for
physical movement of certificates. Participants include securities brokers and
dealers, banks, trust companies and clearing corporations and certain other
organizations. Indirect access to the DTC system is available to others such as
banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies that clear through or maintain a
custodial relationship with a Participant, either directly or indirectly
("Indirect Participants").
Although DTC is expected to follow the foregoing procedures in order to
facilitate transfers of interests in the Global Note among Participants of DTC,
DTC is under no obligation to perform such procedures, and such procedures may
be discontinued at any time. None of the Issuer, the Trustee or the Paying Agent
will have any responsibility for the performance by DTC or its direct or
indirect Participants of their respective obligations under the rules and
procedures governing their operations.
Certificated Securities. Subject to certain conditions, any person having a
beneficial interest in the Global Note may, upon request to the Trustee,
exchange such beneficial interest for 1998 Notes in the form of Certificated
Securities. In addition, the 1998 Notes represented by the Global Note are
exchangeable for Certificated Securities of like tenor as such 1998 Notes in
denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof if (i) DTC notifies the
Issuer that it is unwilling or unable to continue as depositary for the Global
Note, or DTC ceases to be a "Clearing Agency" registered under the Exchange Act,
and a successor depositary is not appointed by the Issuer within 90 days or (ii)
an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing with respect to the 1998
Notes. Upon the occurrence of any of the events described in the preceding
sentence, the Issuer will cause the appropriate Certificated Securities to be
delivered.
114
117
CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following discussion summarizes the material United States federal
income tax considerations generally applicable to holders acquiring the 1998
Series B Notes pursuant to the Exchange Offer but does not purport to be a
complete analysis of all potential consequences. The discussion is based upon
the Code, Treasury regulations, Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") rulings and
judicial decisions now in effect, all of which are subject to change at any time
by legislative, judicial or administrative action. Any such changes may be
applied retroactively in a manner that could adversely affect a holder of the
1998 Series B Notes. The discussion assumes that the holders of the 1998 Series
B Notes will hold them as "capital assets" within the meaning of Section 1221 of
the Code.
The tax treatment of a holder of the 1998 Series B Notes may vary depending
on such holder's particular situation or status. Certain holders (including S
corporations, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, financial
institutions, broker-dealers, taxpayers subject to alternative minimum tax and
persons holding the 1998 Series B Notes as part of a straddle, hedging or
conversion transaction) may be subject to special rules not discussed below. The
following discussion does not consider all aspects of United States federal
income tax that may be relevant to the purchase, ownership and disposition of
the 1998 Series B Notes by a holder in light of such holder's personal
circumstances. In addition, the discussion does not consider the effect of any
applicable foreign, state or local tax laws. PERSONS CONSIDERING THE EXCHANGE OF
THE 1998 SERIES A NOTES FOR 1998 SERIES B NOTES SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX
ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICATION OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX
LAWS TO THEIR PARTICULAR SITUATIONS AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES ARISING
UNDER THE LAWS OF ANY STATE, LOCAL OR FOREIGN TAXING JURISDICTION.
For purposes of this discussion, a "U.S. Holder" means a citizen or
resident of the United States, a corporation, partnership or other entity
created or organized in the United States or under the laws of the United States
or of any political subdivision thereof, an estate whose income is includible in
gross income for United States federal income tax purposes regardless of its
source or a trust, if a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over
the administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority
to control all substantial decisions of the trust. A "Non-U.S. Holder" means a
holder who is not a U.S. Holder.
INTRODUCTION
The exchange of 1998 Series A Notes for 1998 Series B Notes will not
constitute a recognition event for federal income tax purposes. Consequently, no
gain or loss will be recognized by holders upon receipt of the 1998 Series B
Notes. The 1998 Series B Notes will have the same issue date and issue price as
the 1998 Series A Notes. A holder's adjusted tax basis in the 1998 Series B
Notes will be the same as the holder's adjusted tax basis in the 1998 Series A
Notes exchanged therefor. A holder will be considered to have held the 1998
Series B Notes from the time the holder originally acquired the 1998 Series A
Notes.
TAX CONSEQUENCES TO U.S. HOLDERS
Interest on the 1998 Series B Notes
Interest paid on the 1998 Series B Notes will generally be taxable to a
U.S. Holder as ordinary interest income at the time it is accrued or is received
in accordance with the U.S. Holder's method of accounting for federal income tax
purposes.
Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of the 1998 Series B Notes
Upon the sale or other taxable disposition of the 1998 Series B Notes, the
difference between the sum of the amount of cash and the fair market value of
other property received (other than amounts attributable to accrued unpaid
interest) and the holder's adjusted tax basis in the 1998 Series B Notes will
generally be capital gain or loss. In the case of a holder who acquired a 1998
Series A Note at a "market discount" (as the term is defined in the Code), a
portion of any gain recognized on the disposition of the 1998 Series B Note
115
118
received in exchange for such 1998 Series A Note will be treated as ordinary
income. Any capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the
holder's holding period for the 1998 Series B Notes exceeds one year.
TAX CONSEQUENCES TO NON-U.S. HOLDERS
Interest on the 1998 Series B Notes
Interest paid by the Company to a Non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to
United States federal income or withholding tax if such interest is not
effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United
States by such Non-U.S. Holder and such Non-U.S. Holder (i) does not actually or
constructively own 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes
of stock of the Company entitled to vote; (ii) is not a controlled foreign
corporation with respect to which the Company is a "related person" within the
meaning of the Code; and (iii) certifies, under penalties of perjury, that such
holder is not a United States person and provides such holder's name and address
(the "Portfolio Interest Exemption").
Interest paid to a Non-U.S. Holder of the 1998 Series B Notes that is
effectively connected with a United States trade or business conducted by such
Non-U.S. Holder will be taxed at the graduated rates applicable to United States
citizens, resident aliens and domestic corporations (the "Regular Federal Income
Tax") and will not be subject to withholding tax if the Non-U.S. Holder gives an
appropriate statement to the Company or its paying agent in advance of the
interest payment. In addition to the Regular Federal Income Tax, effectively
connected interest received by a Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation may also
be subject to a branch profits tax at a rate of 30% (or such lower rate as may
be specified by an applicable income tax treaty).
Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of the 1998 Series B Notes
A Non-U.S. Holder will generally not be subject to United States federal
income tax on gain recognized on a sale or other disposition of a 1998 Series B
Note unless (i) the gain is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or
business within the United States by the Non-U.S. Holder or (ii) in the case of
a Non-U.S. Holder who is a nonresident alien individual and holds the 1998
Series B Note as a capital asset, such holder is present in the United States
for 183 or more days in the taxable year and certain other requirements are met.
If a Non-U.S. Holder falls within clause (i) in the preceding paragraph,
the holder will be taxed on the net gain derived from the sale under the Regular
Federal Income Tax and may be subject to withholding under certain circumstances
(and, with respect to corporate Non-U.S. Holders, may also be subject to the
branch profits tax described above). If an individual Non-U.S. Holder falls
under clause (ii) in the preceding paragraph, the holder generally will be
subject to United States federal income tax at a rate of 30% on the gain derived
from the sale.
Federal Estate Taxes
If interest on the 1998 Series B Notes is exempt from withholding of United
States federal income tax under the Portfolio Interest Exemption, the 1998
Series B Notes will not be included in the estate of a deceased Non-U.S. Holder
for United States federal estate tax purposes.
New Withholding Regulations
The Treasury Department recently promulgated final regulations regarding
the withholding and information reporting rules applicable to Non-U.S. Holders
(the "New Withholding Regulations"). In general, the New Withholding Regulations
do not significantly alter the substantive withholding and information reporting
requirements but rather unify current certification procedures and forms and
clarify reliance standards. The New Withholding Regulations are generally
effective for payments made after December 31, 1999, subject to certain
transition rules. NON-U.S. HOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS WITH
RESPECT TO THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF THE NEW WITHHOLDING REGULATIONS.
116
119
INFORMATION REPORTING AND BACKUP WITHHOLDING
Generally, interest on the proceeds from the sale of the 1998 Series B
Notes will be reported to the IRS with respect to U.S. Holders' Interest on the
1998 Series B Notes will be reported to the IRS with respect to Non-U.S.
Holders.
A U.S. Holder of 1998 Series B Notes may be subject to backup withholding
at the rate of 31% with respect to interest paid on, or the proceeds of a sale
or other disposition of, the 1998 Series B Notes unless such holder (a) is a
corporation or comes within certain other exempt categories and, when required,
demonstrates its exemption or (b) provides a correct taxpayer identification
number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding and
otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules.
A U.S. Holder of 1998 Series B Notes who does not provide the Company with the
holder's correct taxpayer identification number may be subject to penalties
imposed by the IRS. A Non-U.S. Holder of 1998 Series B Notes may also be subject
to certain information reporting or backup withholding if certain requisite
certification is not received or other exemptions do not apply. Any amount paid
as backup withholding would be creditable against the holder's federal income
tax liability, provided the required information is furnished to the IRS.
117
120
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
GENERAL
The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of 8,000,000 shares of
Class A Common Stock, 6,000,000 shares of Multi-Vote Common, 300,000 shares of
Non-Voting Common and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, of which 10,000
shares have been designated as Series A Preferred and 1,000 shares have been
designated as Series B Preferred. As of May 31, 1998, 164,271.54 shares of the
Class A Common Stock, 2,353,498 shares of Multi-Vote Common, 225,000 shares of
Non-Voting Common, 6,962.21365 shares of Series A Preferred and 991.1039 shares
of Series B Preferred were outstanding. As used herein, the term "Common Stock"
refers collectively to the Class A Common Stock, Multi-Vote Common and
Non-Voting Common. All of the outstanding shares of all classes of Common Stock
and all series of preferred stock are fully paid and nonassessable.
COMMON STOCK
Each share of Non-Voting Common will automatically convert into one share
of Class A Common Stock or one share of any other class of common stock of the
Issuer that is registered with the SEC or is listed on a national securities
exchange or authorized for quotation on Nasdaq or otherwise subject to
registration under the Exchange Act, provided the terms thereof are no less
favorable to holders than were the terms of the Non-Voting Common. Each share of
Multi-Vote Common is convertible, at the option of the holder and automatically
and irrevocably upon the occurrence of a Conversion Event, into one share of
Class A Common Stock. A "Conversion Event" is currently defined as a transfer
other than in a transaction (a) on a securities exchange or public quotation
system, whether or not registered as such under the Exchange Act, (b) effected
to or through a person acting as a broker or dealer, (c) as a result of which
the shares of Multi-Vote Common cease to be "restricted securities" within the
meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act or (d) that is (or if it occurred
in the United States, would be) required to be registered under the Securities
Act. In connection with the proposed IPO, the definition of "Conversion Event"
will be modified such that upon consummation of the IPO, a "Conversion Event"
will be defined as the occurrence of (i) the direct or indirect transfer by a
holder of Multi-Vote Common of beneficial ownership of the Multi-Vote Common to
a person or entity other than a Permitted Holder or (ii) any event or
circumstance as a result of which a holder of Multi-Vote Common ceases to be a
Permitted Holder. For purposes of this definition, "Permitted Holder" will be
defined as any of (i) GVL or Caisse or any of their respective affiliates or
(ii) Andre Chagnon, his spouse or any of his lineal descendants and their
respective spouses (collectively, the "Chagnon Family"), whether acting in their
own name or as one or as a majority of persons having the power to exercise the
voting rights attached to, or having investment power over, shares of Common
Stock held by others, or (iii) any affiliate of any member of the Chagnon Family
or (iv) any trust principally for the benefit of one or more members of the
Chagnon Family (whether or not any member of the Chagnon Family is a trustee of
such trust) or (v) any charitable foundation a majority of whose members,
trustees or directors, as the case may be, are persons referred to in (ii)
above. For purposes of this definition, "lineal descendant" shall include at any
time any person that is adopted, is treated as being adopted or is in the
process of being adopted by any member of the Chagnon Family at such time.
The rights of the holders of the Class A Common Stock, Multi-Vote Common
and Non-Voting Common are identical in all respects except that holders of the
Class A Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each issued and outstanding
share and the holders of Multi-Vote Common are entitled to 10 votes for each
issued and outstanding share and holders of Non-Voting Common, except as
otherwise may be required by law, are not entitled to notice of or to vote at
any meetings of the stockholders or actions taken by written consent. Holders of
Common Stock do not have cumulative voting rights, so that holders of more than
50% of the voting rights attached to the Common Stock are able to elect all of
the Company's Directors. The holders of all of the outstanding shares of
Multi-Vote Common have entered into a voting agreement pursuant to which they
have agreed to vote their shares for certain nominees. See "Principal
Stockholders -- Stockholders' Agreement" and "Risk Factors -- Control by GVL."
Holders of the Class A Common Stock, Multi-Vote
118
121
Common and Non-Voting Common vote together as a single class on all matters
submitted to a vote of the stockholders, other than certain matters which may
adversely affect the rights of the individual class.
The holders of Common Stock will be entitled to receive dividends and other
distributions as may be declared thereon by the Board out of assets or funds of
the Company legally available therefor, subject to the rights of the holders of
any series of preferred stock and any other provision of the certificate of
incorporation. The certificate of incorporation of the Company provides that if
at any time a dividend or other distribution in cash or other property is paid
on Class A Common Stock or Multi-Vote Common or Non-Voting Common, a like
dividend or other distribution in cash or other property will also be paid on
Class A Common Stock or Multi-Vote Common or Non-Voting Common, as the case may
be, in an equal amount per share. In this connection, the certificate of
incorporation specifically provides that if shares of Multi-Vote Common are paid
on Multi-Vote Common and shares of Non-Voting Common are paid on Non-Voting
Common and shares of Class A Common Stock are paid on Class A Common Stock, in
an equal amount per share of Multi-Vote Common, Non-Voting Common and Class A
Common Stock, such payment will be deemed to be a like dividend or other
distribution. In the case of any split, subdivision, combination or
reclassification of Multi-Vote Common or Non-Voting Common or Class A Common
Stock, the shares of Class A Common Stock, Non-Voting Common or Multi-Vote
Common, as the case may be, will also be split, subdivided, combined or
reclassified so that the number of shares of Multi-Vote Common, Non-Voting
Common and Class A Common Stock outstanding immediately following such split,
subdivision, combination or reclassification will bear the same relationship to
each other as that which existed immediately prior thereto, unless a different
basis has been consented to by the holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares of the Class A Common Stock or Multi-Vote Common, as applicable, or
two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Non-Voting Common, to the extent any
such class would be adversely affected by such action.
Subject to the conversion rights of the Non-Voting Common, in the event of
any corporate merger, consolidation, purchase or acquisition of property or
stock, or other reorganization in which any consideration is to be received by
the holders of the Class A Common Stock, Non-Voting Common or Multi-Vote Common,
the holders of the Class A Common Stock, the holders of the Non-Voting Common
and the holders of Multi-Vote Common will receive the same consideration on a
per share basis; except that, if such consideration shall consist in any part of
voting securities (or of options or warrants to purchase, or securities
convertible into or exchangeable for, voting securities), (i) the holders of
Multi-Vote Common may receive, on a per share basis, voting securities with ten
times the number of votes per share as those voting securities to be received by
the holders of the Class A Common Stock (or options or warrants to purchase, or
securities convertible into or exchangeable for, voting securities with ten
times the number of votes per share as those voting securities issuable upon the
exercise of the options or warrants, or into which the convertible or
exchangeable securities may be converted or exchanged, to be received by the
holders of the Class A Common Stock) and (ii) the holders of Non-Voting Common
may receive, on a per share basis, non-voting securities (or options or warrants
to purchase non-voting securities or securities convertible into or exchangeable
for non-voting securities).
In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company,
the holders of the Common Stock will be entitled to receive the assets and funds
of the Company available for distribution after payments to creditors and to the
holders of any preferred stock of the Company that may at the time be
outstanding in proportion to the number of shares held by them, respectively,
without regard to class. There are no rights of redemption or sinking fund
provisions with respect to outstanding shares of any class of capital stock. The
Company, VPC and CDPQ have contractually agreed to certain preemptive rights
with respect to any future issuances of capital stock. Subject to certain
exceptions (including a public offering of the Company's equity securities), the
Company is obligated to afford CDPQ preemptive rights to purchase equity
securities which the Company proposes to sell in proportion to CDPQ's ownership
of the total outstanding equity securities of the Company prior to the sale. See
"Principal Stockholders -- Stockholders' Agreement."
This description is intended as a summary and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the DGCL and the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and
Bylaws. Copies of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws have
been filed as an exhibit hereto.
119
122
PREFERRED STOCK
The preferred stock may be issued at any time or from time to time in one
or more series with such designations, powers, preferences, rights,
qualifications, limitations and restrictions (including dividend, conversion and
voting rights) as may be fixed by the Board, without any further vote or action
by the stockholders. Although the Company has no present plans to issue any
additional shares of preferred stock, the ownership and control of the Company
by the holders of the Common Stock would be diluted if the Company were to issue
preferred stock that had voting rights or that was convertible into Common
Stock. In addition, the holders of preferred stock issued by the Company would
be entitled by law to vote on certain transactions such as a merger or
consolidation, and thus the issuance of preferred stock could dilute the voting
rights of the holders of the Common Stock on such issues. The issuance of
preferred stock could also have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing
a change of control of the Company.
The Company currently has outstanding two series of preferred stock. In
connection with the proposed IPO, VPC has informed the Company that it intends
to exercise its right to convert all of the outstanding shares of Series A
Preferred into shares of Multi-Vote Common upon consummation of the proposed
IPO. The Company intends to cause all of the shares of Series B Preferred to be
converted into shares of Class A Common Stock promptly following the proposed
IPO, if consummated.
The Series A Preferred is convertible into Multi-Vote Common, at the option
of the holder, during the 180-day period following the receipt by the Company of
the proceeds from an initial public offering of equity securities or if such
period has not previously expired, the 90-day period commencing April 30, 1999
(the "Series A Conversion Period"). Shares of Series A Preferred may be
converted by the holder into shares of Multi-Vote Common at the "conversion
price" which is defined as the price per share which is the highest of (i)
$82.18, (ii) the price per share at which the Common Stock is first sold to the
public in an initial public offering of equity securities and (iii) the quotient
of $225 million divided by the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding, on
a fully diluted basis, subject to certain adjustments and exceptions.
After the consummation of an initial public offering of Common Stock, the
Series B Preferred is convertible into Class A Common Stock at the option or the
holder or the Company. The Company intends to cause the conversion of all the
outstanding shares of Series B Preferred into Class A Common Stock promptly
after the consummation of the proposed IPO, if consummated, by delivering a
notice to each holder of Series B Preferred. Such notice will automatically
become effective upon receipt thereof. The number of shares of Class A Common
Stock issuable upon conversion of each share of Series B Preferred will be
determined by dividing the sum of (i) the liquidation preference ($60,000 per
share) plus all accrued and unpaid dividends on such share by (ii) the initial
public offering price of the Common Stock.
As of May 31, 1998, the Company had outstanding 6,962.21365 shares of the
Series A Preferred (having an aggregate liquidation preference of approximately
$139,244,000). Holders of the Series A Preferred are entitled to receive
cumulative dividends accruing at the annual rate of 9.75% of the aggregate
liquidation preference thereof. Prior to the expiration of the Series A
Conversion Period, dividends are payable annually, in arrears, by the issuance
of additional shares of Series A Preferred having an aggregate liquidation
preference equal to the amount of such dividends. After the expiration of the
Conversion Period, dividends are payable annually, in arrears, in cash. Unless
full cumulative dividends on all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred have
been paid, the Company may not make dividend payments or distributions on any
securities junior to the Series A Preferred ("Series A Junior Securities")
(other than dividend payments or other distributions paid solely in shares of
Series A Junior Securities) or redeem or make sinking fund or similar
contributions for the redemption of any Series A Junior Securities. Shares of
Series B Preferred are Series A Junior Securities.
The Series A Preferred is redeemable, in whole or in part, at the option of
the Company, at any time after the Series A Conversion Period, at a price, in
cash, equal to the liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends to
the date of redemption. Subject to certain limited exceptions and except as
required by law, holders of the Series A Preferred have no voting rights.
120
123
As of May 31, 1998, the Company had outstanding 991.1039 shares of the
Series B Preferred (having an aggregate liquidation preference $59,466,000).
Holders of the Series B Preferred are entitled to receive cumulative dividends
accruing at the annual rate of 8% of the aggregate liquidation preference
thereof. Dividends are payable quarterly, in arrears, by the issuance of
additional shares of Series B Preferred having an aggregate liquidation
preference equal to the amount of such dividends. Unless full cumulative
dividends on all outstanding shares of Series B Preferred have been paid, the
Company may not make dividend payments or distributions on any securities junior
to the Series B Preferred ("Series B Junior Securities") (other than dividend
payments or other distributions paid solely in shares of Series B Junior
Securities) or redeem or make sinking fund or similar contributions for the
redemption of any Series B Junior Securities.
The Series B Preferred is redeemable at any time, in whole or in part, at
the option of the Company. Subject to certain limited exceptions and except as
required by law, holders of the Series B Preferred have no voting rights.
This description is intended as a summary and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the DGCL, the Series A Preferred Certificate of Designation and
the Series B Preferred Certificate of Designation. Copies of the Series A
Preferred Certificate of Designation and the Series B Preferred Certificate of
Designation have been filed as exhibits hereto.
OUTSTANDING OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
As of May 31, 1998, there were outstanding options to purchase 88,557.98
shares of the Class A Common Stock pursuant to the Plan with a weighted average
exercise price of $84.37 per share. See "Management -- Incentive Stock Plan." As
of the same date, there are outstanding warrants to purchase 35,127.22 shares of
the Class A Common Stock with a weighted average exercise price of $59.81 per
share. Under the Kofalt Warrant, Mr. Kofalt has the right to purchase up to
24,992 shares of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of $53.55 per share.
The Kofalt Warrant is presently exercisable and expires on August 31, 1999.
Under the Cole Warrant, Mr. Cole has the right to purchase up to 9,406.36 shares
of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of $74.42 per share. The Cole
Warrant is presently exercisable and expires on July 11, 2002. In addition,
Gordon Hecht has a warrant to purchase up to 728.86 shares of Class A Common
Stock at an exercise price of $85.75 per share (the "Hecht Warrant"). The Hecht
Warrant is presently exercisable and expires on December 31, 2000. The Kofalt
Warrant, the Cole Warrant and the Hecht Warrant provide for adjustments to the
number of exercisable shares and the exercise price if the Company pays a common
stock dividend or distribution to its stockholders, subdivides its common stock,
combines its common stock into a smaller number of shares or issues by
reclassification of its common stock other securities, subject to certain
exceptions and limitations.
CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF OPTEL'S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND OF DELAWARE LAW
General. The Certificate of Incorporation of OpTel and the DGCL contain
certain provisions that could make more difficult the acquisition of OpTel by
means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or otherwise. These provisions are
expected to discourage certain types of coercive takeover practices and
inadequate takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of
OpTel first to negotiate with OpTel. Although such provisions may have the
effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of OpTel, the
Company believes that the benefits of increased protection of OpTel's potential
ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal
to acquire or restructure the Company outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging
such proposals because, among other things, negotiation of such proposals could
result in an improvement of their terms. The description set forth below is
intended as a summary only and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
Certificate of Incorporation of OpTel.
Multi-Vote Common and Blank Check Preferred Stock. As of May 31, 1998, the
Company had outstanding 2,353,498 shares of Multi-Vote Common. In addition, the
Company's Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to
1,000,000 shares of preferred stock from time to time in one or more designated
series of which approximately 6,962 shares of Series A Preferred and the
approximately 991 shares of Series B Preferred are outstanding. See
"-- Preferred Stock." The Board, without approval of the
121
124
stockholders, is authorized to establish voting, dividend, redemption,
conversion, liquidation and other provisions of a particular series of preferred
stock. The outstanding Multi-Vote Common does, and the issuance of additional
shares of Multi-Vote Common or preferred stock could, under certain
circumstances, make it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or
discourage a third party from acquiring, control of the Company. See "Risk
Factors -- Control by GVL." The Board has no present intention to authorize the
issuance of any additional series of preferred stock.
Anti-Takeover Statute. Section 203 of the DGCL ("Section 203") prohibits
certain persons ("Interested Stockholders") from engaging in a "business
combination" with a Delaware corporation for three years following the date such
persons become Interested Stockholders. Interested Stockholders generally
include (i) persons who are the beneficial owners of 15% or more of the
outstanding voting stock of the corporation and (ii) persons who are affiliates
or associates of the corporation and who held 15% or more of the corporation's
outstanding voting stock at any time within three years before the date on which
such person's status as an Interested Stockholder is determined. Subject to
certain exceptions, a "business combination" includes, among other things (i)
mergers or consolidations, (ii) the sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge,
transfer or other disposition of assets having an aggregate market value equal
to 10% or more of either the aggregate market value of all assets of the
corporation determined on a consolidated basis or the aggregate market value of
all the outstanding stock of the corporation, (iii) transactions that result in
the issuance or transfer by the corporation of any stock of the corporation to
the Interested Stockholder, except pursuant to a transaction that effects a pro
rata distribution to all stockholders of the corporation, (iv) any transaction
involving the corporation that has the effect of increasing the proportionate
share of the stock of any class or series, or securities convertible into the
stock of any class or series, of the corporation that is owned directly or
indirectly by the Interested Stockholder or (v) any receipt by the Interested
Stockholder of the benefit (except proportionately as a stockholder) of any
loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits provided by or
through the corporation.
Section 203 does not apply to a business combination if (i) before a person
becomes an Interested Stockholder, the board of directors of the corporation
approves the transaction in which the Interested Stockholder became an
Interested Stockholder or approved the business combination, (ii) upon
consummation of the transaction that resulted in the Interested Stockholder
becoming an Interested Stockholder, the Interested Stockholder owned at least
85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the
transaction commenced (other than certain excluded shares) or (iii) concurrently
with or following a transaction in which the person became an Interested
Stockholder, the business combination is (a) approved by the board of directors
of the corporation and (b) authorized at an annual or special meeting of
stockholders (and not by written consent) by the affirmative vote of the holders
of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation not
owned by the Interested Stockholder.
122
125
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Each broker-dealer that receives 1998 Series B Notes for its own account
pursuant to the Exchange Offer must acknowledge that it will deliver a
prospectus in connection with any resale of the 1998 Series B Notes. This
Prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, may be used
by a broker-dealer in connection with resales of 1998 Series B Notes received in
exchange for 1998 Series A Notes acquired as a result of market-making
activities or other trading activities. The Company has agreed that starting on
the Exchange Date and ending on the earlier of (i) the date that all 1998 Series
B Notes have been sold by such participating broker-dealer and (ii) 365 days
after the Exchange Date (the "Registration Period"), it will make this
Prospectus, as amended or supplemented, available to any broker-dealer for use
in connection with any such resale. In addition, until , 1998, all
dealers effecting transactions in the 1998 Series B Notes may be required to
deliver a prospectus.
The Company will not receive any proceeds from any sale of 1998 Series B
Notes by broker-dealers. The 1998 Series B Notes received by broker-dealers for
their own account pursuant to the Exchange Offer may be sold from time to time
in one or more transactions in the over-the-counter market, in negotiated
transactions, through the writing of options in the 1998 Series B Notes or a
combination of such methods of resale, at market prices prevailing at the time
of resale, prices related to such prevailing market prices or negotiated prices.
Any such resale may be made directly to purchasers or to or through brokers or
dealers who may receive compensation in the form of commissions or concessions
from any such broker-dealer and/or the purchasers of any 1998 Series B Notes.
Any broker-dealer that resells 1998 Series B Notes that were received by it for
its own account pursuant to the Exchange Offer and any broker-dealer that
participates in a distribution of 1998 Series B Notes may be deemed to be an
"underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act and any profit on any
resale of 1998 Series B Notes and any commissions or concessions received by any
such persons may be deemed to be underwriting compensation under the Securities
Act. The Letter of Transmittal states that by acknowledging that it will deliver
and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer will not be deemed to admit that
it is an "underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act.
During the Registration Period, the Company will promptly send additional
copies of this Prospectus and any amendment or supplement to this Prospectus to
any broker-dealer that requests such documents in the Letter of Transmittal. The
Company has agreed to pay all expenses of the Exchange Offer (including the
expenses of one counsel for the holders of the 1998 Series A Notes) other than
commissions or concessions of any brokers or dealers and will indemnify the
holders of the 1998 Series A Notes (including any broker-dealers) against
certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
The Company has not entered into any arrangement or understanding with any
person to distribute the 1998 Series B Notes to be received in the Exchange
Offer and to the best of the Company's knowledge and belief, each person
participating in the Exchange Offer is acquiring the 1998 Series B Note in its
ordinary course of business and has no arrangement or understanding with any
person to participate in the distribution of the 1998 Series B Notes to be
received in the Exchange Offer.
LEGAL MATTERS
The legality of the securities offered hereby will be passed upon for the
Company by Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP, 1114 Avenue of the Americas, New
York, New York 10036-7798. Certain federal regulatory matters relating to the
Exchange Offer or described herein will be passed upon for the Company by
Goldberg, Godles, Wiener & Wright, 1229 Nineteenth Street, N.W., Washington,
D.C. 20036, the Company's FCC Counsel. Russell S. Berman of Kronish Lieb Weiner
& Hellman LLP and Henry Goldberg of Goldberg, Godles, Wiener & Wright each hold
one-third of the outstanding equity interests in THI. See "Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions -- License Holding Company."
123
126
EXPERTS
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 1994, the eight month period ended August 31, 1995 and as of and
for the years ended August 31, 1996 and August 31, 1997, and the Financial
Statements of the Assets and Liabilities of ICS Communications, LLC, acquired by
the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 1997, have been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their reports
appearing herein and have been so included in reliance upon the reports of such
firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Company has filed with the Commission a Registration Statement on Form
S-4 under the Securities Act with respect to the securities offered hereby. This
Prospectus, which constitutes a part of the Registration Statement, does not
contain all of the information set forth in the Registration Statement or the
exhibits and schedules thereto, certain portions having been omitted as
permitted by the rules and regulations of the Commission. For further
information with respect to the Company and the securities offered hereby,
reference is made to the Registration Statement, including the exhibits and
financial statement schedules thereto, which may be inspected without charge at
the public reference facility maintained by the Commission at Room 1024, 450
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, and at the Commission's Regional
Offices located at Seven World Trade Center, 13th Floor, New York, New York
10007 and Citicorp Center, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago,
Illinois 60661. Copies of such material may be obtained from the Public
Reference Section of the Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20549, at prescribed rates. The Commission maintains a Web site that contains
reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding
registrants that file electronically with the Commission. Such Web site is
located at http://www.sec.gov. While the Company has disclosed all the
information material to an investment decision regarding the securities offered
hereby, statements made in this Prospectus concerning the contents of any
document referred to herein are not necessarily complete. With respect to each
such document filed with the Commission as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement, reference is made to the exhibit for a more complete description of
the matter involved, and each such statement shall be deemed qualified in its
entirety by such reference.
The Company will provide without charge to each person to whom a copy of
this Prospectus has been delivered, a copy of any or all of the documents (other
than exhibits to such documents) which have been incorporated by reference in
the Registration Statement, upon the oral or written request of such person to
OpTel, Inc., 1111 W. Mockingbird Lane, Dallas, Texas 75247 (telephone (214)
634-3800), Attention: Andrew N. Jent.
124
127
APPENDIX A
GLOSSARY
Access Charges -- The charges paid by an IXC to an ILEC or CLEC for the
origination or termination of the IXC's customer's long distance calls.
CAP (Competitive Access Provider) -- A service provider that competes with
local telephone companies for access traffic by providing to high-volume
customers private line access to IXCs. Although traditional CAPs did not provide
a complete package of local exchange services, some CAPs have begun to provide
local exchange services following the passage of the Telecom Act.
Central Office -- The switching center and/or central circuit termination
facility of a local telephone company.
CLEC (Competitive Local Exchange Carrier) -- A telephone service provider
(carrier) offering services similar to those offered by the former monopoly
local telephone company. A CLEC may also provide other types of
telecommunications services (e.g., long distance).
CLEC Certification -- Granted by a state public service commission or
public utility commission, this certification provides a telecommunications
services provider with the legal standing to offer local exchange telephone
services in direct competition with ILECs and other CLECs. Such certifications
are granted on a state-by-state basis.
Communications Act of 1934 -- Federal legislation that established rules
for broadcast and nonbroadcast communications, including both wireless and wire
line telephone service which continues, as amended, to be in effect today.
EBITDA -- represents earnings before interest expense (net of interest
income and amounts capitalized), income tax benefits, depreciation and
amortization. EBITDA is not intended to represent cash flow from operations or
an alternative to net loss, each as defined by generally accepted accounting
principles. In addition, the measure of EBITDA presented herein may not be
comparable to other similarly titled measures by other companies. The Company
believes that EBITDA is a standard measure commonly reported and widely used by
analysts, investors and other interested parties in the cable television and
telecommunications industries. Accordingly, this information has been disclosed
herein to permit a more complete comparative analysis of the Company's operating
performance relative to other companies in its industry.
FCC (Federal Communications Commission) -- The principal U.S. Government
agency charged with the oversight of all public communications media.
HDTV (High Definition Television) -- Digital signals used in television
broadcasting which have been the subject of recent federal legislation.
Head End -- Equipment necessary to receive video programming via satellite
transmission and combine the signals into a channel lineup for distribution.
Hertz, Megahertz and Gigahertz -- The dimensional unit for measuring the
frequency with which an electromagnetic signal cycles through the zero-value
state between lowest and highest states. One Hertz (abbreviated Hz) equals one
cycle per second. MHz (MegaHertz) stands for millions of Hertz. GHz (GigaHertz)
stands for billions of Hertz.
ICP (Integrated Communications Provider) -- A communications carrier that
provides packaged or integrated services from among a broad range of categories,
including local exchange services, long distance services, data services, cable
television services and other communications services.
ILEC (Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier) -- The local exchange carrier that
was the monopoly carrier prior to the opening of local exchange services to
competition.
A-1
128
Interconnection (co-carrier) Agreement -- A contract between an ILEC and a
CLEC for the interconnection of the two networks for the purpose of mutual
exchange of traffic between the networks, allowing customers of one of the
networks to call users served by the other network. These agreements set out the
financial and operational aspects of such interconnection.
Interexchange Services -- Telecommunications services that are provided
between two exchange areas, generally meaning between two cities (i.e., long
distance).
InterLATA -- Telecommunications services originating inside a LATA and
terminating outside of that LATA.
Internet -- A global collection of interconnected computer networks which
use a specific communications protocol.
ISDN (Integrated Services Digital Network) -- An information transfer
standard for transmitting digital voice and data over telephone lines at speeds
up to 128 KB per second.
ISP (Internet Service Provider) -- A service provider that provides access
to the Internet, normally for dial-access customers, by sharing communications
lines and equipment.
IXC (Interexchange Carrier) -- A provider of telecommunications services
that extend between exchanges or cities, also known as a long distance provider.
KB (Kilobits) per second -- A transmission rate. One kilobit equals 1,024
bits of information.
LATA (Local Access and Transport Area) -- A geographic area inside of which
a LEC can offer switched telecommunications services, including long distance
(known as local toll). The LATA boundaries were established at the divestiture
of the local exchange business of AT&T.
LEC (Local Exchange Carrier) -- Any telephone service provider offering
local exchange services. LECs include ILECs, RBOCs and CLECs.
LMDS (Local Multipoint Distribution Service) -- A wireless point to
multipoint communications service.
Local Exchange -- An area inside of which telephone calls are generally
completed without any toll or long distance charges. Local exchange areas are
defined by the state regulator of telephone services.
Local Exchange Services -- Telephone services that are provided within a
local exchange. These usually refer to local calling services (e.g., dial tone
services).
MB (Megabits) per second -- A transmission rate. One megabit equals 1,024
kilobits.
MDU (Multiple Dwelling Unit) -- High density residential complexes such as
high- and low-rise apartment buildings, condominiums, cooperatives, townhouses
and mobile home communities.
MMDS (Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service) -- A wireless point to
multipoint distribution system using microwave transmitting and receiving
equipment that broadcasts to individual subscribers in an omni-directional
manner.
Modem -- A device for transmitting digital information over an analog
telephone line.
Network Hubs -- Locations where the Company has installed Head End
equipment and telecommunications transmitting and receiving equipment for
distribution to MDUs.
Network Operations Center -- A facility where the Company monitors and
manages the Company's networks.
PBX (Private Branch Exchange) -- A telephone switching system designed to
operate at the MDU. A PBX connects telephones to each other and to lines and
trunks that connect the PBX to the public network and/or private telephone
networks.
A-2
129
POP (Point of Presence) -- A location where a carrier, usually an IXC, has
located transmission and terminating equipment to connect its network to the
networks of other carriers or to customers.
RBOC (Regional Bell Operating Company) -- ILECs created by the divestiture
of the local exchange business of AT&T. These include BellSouth, Bell Atlantic,
Ameritech, US WEST, SBC Communications, Inc. and PacBell.
Reciprocal Compensation -- The compensation paid to and from one local
exchange carrier to another for termination of a local call on the other's
networks.
STS (Shared Tenant Services) -- The provision of telecommunications
services to multiple tenants by allowing these users to have shared access to
telephone lines and other telephone services.
SMATV (Satellite Master Antenna Television) -- Non-networked systems which
transmit video programming via Head Ends located at individual MDUs.
SONET (Synchronous Optical Network) -- Self-healing rings that provide high
speed redundant connections for the delivery of voice traffic.
Switch -- A device that opens or closes circuits or selects the paths or
circuits to be used for transmission of information. Switching is the process of
interconnecting circuits to form a transmission path between users. A switch
also captures information for billing purposes.
Switch-based -- A communications provider that delivers its services to the
end-user via owned switches and leased (or owned) transport.
T-1 -- A high-speed digital circuit typically linking high volume customer
locations to long distance carriers or other customer locations. Typically
utilized for voice transmissions as well as the interconnection of local area
networks, T-1 service accommodates transmission speeds of up to 1.544 MB per
second, which is equivalent to 24 voice grade equivalent circuits.
Trunk -- A dedicated circuit which concentrates subscriber lines. A trunked
system combines multiple channels with unrestricted access in such a manner that
user demands for channels are automatically "queued" and then allocated to the
first available channel.
A-3
130
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES:
Independent Auditors' Report................................ F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 31, 1996 and 1997
and May 31, 1998 (unaudited).............................. F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended
December 31, 1994, the period from January 1, 1995 to
August 31, 1995, the years ended August 31, 1996 and 1997,
and the nine months ended May 31, 1997 and 1998
(unaudited)............................................... F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the year
ended December 31, 1994, the period from January 1, 1995
to August 31, 1995, the years ended August 31, 1996 and
1997, and the nine months ended May 31, 1997 and 1998
(unaudited)............................................... F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended
December 31, 1994, the period from January 1, 1995 to
August 31, 1995, the years ended August 31, 1996 and 1997,
and the nine months ended May 31, 1997 and 1998
(unaudited)............................................... F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. F-7
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED):
Pro Forma Statements of Operations for the year ended August
31, 1997 and the nine months ended May 31, 1998........... F-26
Notes to Pro Forma Financial Information.................... F-28
ACQUIRED COMPANY:
Assets and Liabilities Acquired of ICS Communications, LLC
by OpTel, Inc.:
Independent Auditors' Report.............................. F-29
Statements of Assets and Liabilities Acquired as of
December 31, 1997 and March 31, 1998 (unaudited)....... F-30
Statements of Revenues and Direct Expenses for the year
ended December 31, 1997 and the three months ended
March 31, 1998 (unaudited)............................. F-31
Notes to Financial Statements............................. F-32
F-1
131
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Board of Directors of
OpTel, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of OpTel, Inc.
and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of August 31, 1996 and 1997 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for
the year ended December 31, 1994, the period from January 1, 1995 to August 31,
1995 and the years ended August 31, 1996 and 1997. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of OpTel, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of August 31, 1996 and 1997 and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 1994, the period from January 1, 1995 to
August 31, 1995 and the years ended August 31, 1996 and 1997 in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
- ------------------------------------
October 14, 1997
Dallas, Texas
F-2
132
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
ASSETS
AUGUST 31, AUGUST 31, MAY 31,
1996 1997 1998
---------- ---------- -----------
(UNAUDITED)
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 1,677 $ 87,305 $ 99,704
Restricted investments (Notes 6 and 12)................... -- 67,206 55,294
Accounts receivable (Net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $542, $1,125 and $1,523, respectively)...... 3,064 4,044 7,249
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other assets............... 1,562 1,836 2,272
Property and equipment, net (Note 4)...................... 103,800 160,442 251,324
Intangible assets, net (Note 5)........................... 65,876 82,583 160,255
-------- -------- ---------
TOTAL........................................... $175,979 $403,416 $ 576,098
======== ======== =========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Accounts payable.......................................... $ 5,649 $ 7,927 $ 4,773
Accrued expenses and other liabilities.................... 10,507 13,969 26,304
Deferred revenue and customer deposits.................... 2,167 2,978 4,293
Convertible notes payable to stockholder (Notes 6 and
9)...................................................... 89,414 129,604 --
Notes payable and long-term obligations (Note 6).......... 2,443 221,653 348,633
Deferred acquisition liabilities (Notes 3 and 6).......... 6,520 6,920 5,153
Dividends payable......................................... -- -- 4,068
-------- -------- ---------
Total liabilities............................... 116,700 383,051 393,224
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 3 and 7)
Stockholders' equity (deficit) (Notes 9, 10 and 13)
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares
authorized; none issued and outstanding.............. -- -- --
Series A preferred stock, $.01 par value; 10,000 shares
authorized; none and 6,962 issued and outstanding.... -- -- 139,244
Series B preferred stock, $.01 par value; 2,000 shares
authorized; none and 991 issued and outstanding...... -- -- 59,466
Class A common stock, $.01 par value; 8,000,000 shares
authorized; none issued and outstanding.............. -- -- 2
Class B common stock, $.01 par value; 6,000,000 shares
authorized; 2,304,561, 2,353,498 and 2,353,498 issued
and outstanding, respectively........................ 23 24 24
Class C common stock, $.01 par value; 300,000 shares
authorized; 225,000 issued and outstanding........... -- 2 2
Additional paid-in capital................................ 88,065 97,683 113,780
Accumulated deficit....................................... (28,809) (77,344) (129,644)
-------- -------- ---------
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)............ 59,279 20,365 182,874
-------- -------- ---------
TOTAL........................................... $175,979 $403,416 $ 576,098
======== ======== =========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
133
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(DOLLARS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
PERIOD FROM NINE MONTHS ENDED
YEAR ENDED JANUARY 1, 1995 YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, MAY 31,
DECEMBER 31, TO AUGUST 31, ----------------------- ---------------------------
1994 1995 1996 1997 1997 1998
------------ --------------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ------------
(UNAUDITED)
REVENUES:
Cable television....................... $ 240 $ 8,783 $ 25,893 $ 36,915 $ 26,915 $ 42,195
Telecommunications..................... 202 788 1,711 2,922 2,202 2,721
------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total revenues................. 442 9,571 27,604 39,837 29,117 44,916
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Programming, access fees and revenue
sharing............................. 470 4,558 11,868 19,202 14,016 20,213
Customer support, general and
administrative...................... 7,733 12,055 19,636 28,926 19,842 25,044
Depreciation and amortization.......... 117 2,420 8,676 14,505 9,934 18,432
------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total operating expenses....... 8,320 19,033 40,180 62,633 43,792 63,689
------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS..................... (7,878) (9,462) (12,576) (22,796) (14,675) (18,773)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense on convertible notes
payable to stockholder (Notes 4 and
9).................................. -- (919) (5,342) (15,204) (10,671) (9,640)
Other interest expense................. (76) (349) (657) (16,210) (6,309) (26,276)
Interest and other income.............. 10 99 145 5,675 (13) 6,457
------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES................. (7,944) (10,631) (18,430) (48,535) (31,668) (48,232)
Income Tax Benefit (Note 8).............. -- 470 -- -- -- --
------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
NET LOSS................................. $(7,944) $(10,161) $(18,430) $(48,535) (31,668) (48,232)
======= ======== ======== ======== -------- --------
Dividends on preferred stock............. -- (4,068)
-------- --------
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON EQUITY... $(31,668) $(52,300)
======== ========
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
(Notes 2 and 10)....................... $ (6.89) $ (8.30) $ (19.98) $ (13.23) $ (20.04)
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES
OUTSTANDING (Notes 2 and 10)........... 1,475 2,220 2,430 2,393 2,610
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
134
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DOLLARS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS)
SERIES A SERIES B CLASS A
PREFERRED STOCK PREFERRED STOCK COMMON STOCK
------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------
PARTNERSHIP SHARES LIQUIDATION SHARES LIQUIDATION SHARES PAR
CAPITAL OUTSTANDING VALUE OUTSTANDING VALUE OUTSTANDING VALUE
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 1994............... $ 689 -- $ -- -- $ -- -- $--
Contributions........................ 10,375 -- -- -- -- -- --..
Net loss of partnership.............. -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Reorganization from partnership...... (11,064) -- -- -- -- -- --
Net loss............................. -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-------- ----- -------- --- ------- --- ---
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1994............. -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of stock upon debt
conversion, net of transaction
costs.............................. -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Sale and issuance of stock........... -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Net loss............................. -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-------- ----- -------- --- ------- --- ---
BALANCE, AUGUST 31, 1995............... -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of stock upon debt
conversion......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Contribution and cancellation of
shares............................. -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Net loss............................. -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-------- ----- -------- --- ------- --- ---
BALANCE, AUGUST 31, 1996............... -- -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of stock with senior notes
offering........................... -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Stock options exercised.............. -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Net loss............................. -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-------- ----- -------- --- ------- --- ---
BALANCE, AUGUST 31, 1997............... -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Preferred stock dividend
(unaudited)........................ -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of stock upon debt
conversion......................... -- 6,962 139,244 -- -- -- --
Issuance of stock to acquire the ICS
operations......................... -- -- -- 991 59,466 164 2
Net loss (unaudited)................. -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-------- ----- -------- --- ------- --- ---
BALANCE, MAY 31, 1998 (unaudited)...... $ -- 6,962 $139,244 991 $59,466 164 $ 2
-------- ----- -------- --- ------- --- ---
-------- ----- --- ---
CLASS B CLASS C
COMMON STOCK COMMON STOCK
------------------- ------------------- ADDITIONAL
SHARES PAR SHARES PAR PAID-IN ACCUMULATED
OUTSTANDING VALUE OUTSTANDING VALUE CAPITAL DEFICIT
----------- ----- ----------- ----- ---------- -----------
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 1994............... -- $-- -- $-- $ -- $ (307)
Contributions........................ -- -- -- -- -- --
Net loss of partnership.............. -- -- -- -- -- (7,725)
Reorganization from partnership...... 717 7 -- -- 3,024 8,032
Net loss............................. -- -- -- -- -- (219)
----- --- --- --- -------- ---------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1994............. 717 7 -- -- 3,024 (219)
Issuance of stock upon debt
conversion, net of transaction
costs.............................. 1,121 11 -- -- 59,194 --
Sale and issuance of stock........... 312 3 -- -- 16,684 --
Net loss............................. -- -- -- -- -- (10,160)
----- --- --- --- -------- ---------
BALANCE, AUGUST 31, 1995............... 2,150 21 -- -- 78,902 (10,379)
Issuance of stock upon debt
conversion......................... 171 2 -- -- 9,163 --
Contribution and cancellation of
shares............................. (16) -- -- -- -- --
Net loss............................. -- -- -- -- -- (18,430)
----- --- --- --- -------- ---------
BALANCE, AUGUST 31, 1996............... 2,305 23 -- -- 88,065 (28,809)
Issuance of stock with senior notes
offering........................... -- -- 225 2 6,998 --
Stock options exercised.............. 48 1 -- -- 2,620 --
Net loss............................. -- -- -- -- -- (48,535)
----- --- --- --- -------- ---------
BALANCE, AUGUST 31, 1997............... 2,353 24 225 2 97,683 (77,344)
Preferred stock dividend
(unaudited)........................ -- -- -- -- -- (4,068)
Issuance of stock upon debt
conversion......................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of stock to acquire the ICS
operations......................... -- -- -- -- 16,097 --
Net loss (unaudited)................. -- -- -- -- -- (48,232)
----- --- --- --- -------- ---------
BALANCE, MAY 31, 1998 (unaudited)...... 2,353 $24 225 $ 2 $113,780 $(129,644)
----- --- --- --- -------- ---------
----- --- --- --- -------- ---------
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
135
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
NINE MONTHS
PERIOD FROM YEAR ENDED ENDED
YEAR ENDED JANUARY 1, 1995 AUGUST 31, MAY 31,
DECEMBER 31, TO AUGUST 31, ------------------- ---------------------
1994 1995 1996 1997 1997 1998
------------ --------------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
(UNAUDITED)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss......................................... $(7,944) $(10,161) $(18,430) $(48,535) $ (31,668) $ (48,232)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
flow used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization.................. 117 2,420 8,676 14,505 9,934 18,432
Deferred tax benefit........................... -- (488) -- -- -- --
Noncash interest expense....................... -- 1,147 5,661 15,107 10,968 10,583
Noncash interest earned on restricted
investments.................................. -- -- -- (2,303) (1,167) (2,713)
Increase(decrease) in cash from changes in
operating assets and liabilities, net of
effect of business combinations:
Accounts receivable.......................... (58) (1,005) (1,370) (754) (1,613) (3,228)
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other
assets..................................... (1,008) 180 (126) (785) (742) (52)
Deferred revenue and other liabilities....... 164 895 906 640 656 888
Accounts payable and accrued expenses........ 5,397 3,518 4,230 6,190 11,009 9,171
------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
Net cash flows used in operating
activities............................... (3,332) (3,494) (453) (15,935) (2,623) (15,151)
------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of businesses.......................... (1,298) (49,974) (9,916) (6,717) (5,048) (41,285)
Acquisition of intangible assets................. (3,211) (608) (7,904) (10,112) (7,710) (6,223)
Purchases and construction of property and
equipment...................................... (6,067) (21,562) (54,217) (61,393) (36,760) (55,792)
Purchases of restricted investments.............. -- -- -- (79,609) (79,609) --
Proceeds from maturity of restricted
investments.................................... -- -- -- 14,706 -- 14,625
------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
Net cash flows used in investing
activities............................... (10,576) (72,144) (72,037) (143,125) (129,127) (88,675)
------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from convertible notes payable.......... 15,000 62,823 73,438 33,700 33,700 --
Repayments on convertible notes payable.......... -- -- -- (10,000) (10,000) --
Proceeds from senior notes payable............... -- -- -- 218,000 218,000 --
Financing costs of senior notes payable.......... -- -- -- (5,738) (4,776) --
Proceeds from bank financing, net of transaction
costs.......................................... -- -- -- -- -- 119,381
Proceeds from issuance of common stock........... -- 16,688 -- 9,620 7,000 --
Payment on notes payable and long term
obligations.................................... (6,489) (6,856) (1,307) (894) (354) (1,679)
Payment of deferred acquisition liabilities...... -- -- -- -- -- (1,477)
Contributions received from partners............. 10,375 -- -- -- -- --
------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
Net cash flows provided by financing
activities............................... 18,886 72,655 72,131 244,688 243,570 116,225
------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS...................................... 4,978 (2,983) (359) 85,628 111,820 12,399
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD... 41 5,019 2,036 1,677 1,677 87,305
------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD......... $ 5,019 $ 2,036 $ 1,677 $ 87,305 $ 113,497 $ 99,704
======= ======== ======== ======== ========= =========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
(Notes 3 and 9)
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest....................................... $ 39 $ 120 $ 290 $ 15,059 $ 249 $ 18,989
======= ======== ======== ======== ========= =========
Taxes.......................................... $ -- $ 19 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
======= ======== ======== ======== ========= =========
Increase in capital lease obligations............ $ -- $ -- $ 879 $ 1,630 $ 942 $ 1,634
======= ======== ======== ======== ========= =========
Convertible debt issued for accrued interest..... $ -- $ -- $ 6,436 $ 16,490 $ -- $ 9,640
======= ======== ======== ======== ========= =========
Conversion of convertible debt and partnership
capital to common stock:
Partnership capital............................ $(3,031) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
======= ======== ======== ======== ========= =========
Convertible debt and accrued interest.......... $ -- $(60,792) $ (9,166) $ -- $ -- $ --
======= ======== ======== ======== ========= =========
Common stock................................... $ 7 $ 11 $ 2 $ -- $ -- $ --
======= ======== ======== ======== ========= =========
Additional paid-in capital, net of transaction
costs........................................ $ 3,024 $ 59,194 $ 9,163 $ -- $ -- $ --
======= ======== ======== ======== ========= =========
Preferred stock issued for convertible debt...... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 139,244
======= ======== ======== ======== ========= =========
Preferred stock issued for purchase of
business....................................... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 59,466
======= ======== ======== ======== ========= =========
Common stock issued for purchase of business..... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 16,099
======= ======== ======== ======== ========= =========
Increase in dividends payable.................... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 4,068
======= ======== ======== ======== ========= =========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
136
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
OpTel, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and subsidiaries (the "Company" or
"OpTel") is the successor of the cable television and telecommunications
operations of Vanguard Communications, L.P. ("Vanguard"). Vanguard commenced
operations in April 1993. On December 20, 1994, Vanguard contributed its cable
television and telecommunications operations to its wholly owned subsidiary,
OpTel. The contribution to OpTel was recorded at Vanguard's historical cost.
OpTel is a developer, operator and owner of private cable television and
telecommunications systems that utilize advanced technologies to deliver cable
television and telecommunications services to customers in multiple dwelling
units ("MDUs"). The Company negotiates long-term, generally exclusive cable
television service agreements and nonexclusive telecommunications service
agreements with owners and managers of MDUs, generally for terms of up to 15
years. The company's primary markets are major metropolitan areas in Arizona,
California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois and Texas.
During the period from April 20, 1993 (date of inception) to March 31,
1995, the Company was wholly owned by Vanguard. On March 31, 1995, VPC
Corporation ("VPC") (a wholly owned subsidiary of Le Groupe Videotron Ltee
("Videotron") -- a Quebec corporation), acquired a 66.75% interest in the
Company. At August 31, 1997, VPC's interest in the Company was 74.62% (see Note
9).
In 1995, the Company elected to change its year-end to August 31 from
December 31 to conform to that of its new majority stockholder.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Interim Financial Information -- The accompanying unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial
information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial information. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting
only of normal recurring entries) considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. Operating results for the nine month period ended May 31,
1997 and 1998, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the entire fiscal year or any other interim period.
Principles of Consolidation -- The consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of OpTel and its wholly owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries and limited partnerships. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated. Amounts due to minority limited partners are
included in notes payable and long-term obligations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents -- Cash and cash equivalents of the Company are
composed of demand deposits with banks and highly liquid, short-term investments
with maturities of three months or less when purchased.
Restricted Investments -- Restricted investments of the Company are
composed of U.S. Treasury securities restricted for payment of interest on the
Company's 1997 Notes. These investments are classified as held to maturity and
are carried at amortized cost.
Property and Equipment -- Property and equipment are stated at cost, which
includes amounts for construction materials, direct labor and overhead, and
capitalized interest. When assets are disposed of, the costs and related
accumulated depreciation are removed, and any resulting gain or loss is
reflected in income for the period. Cost of maintenance and repairs is charged
to operations as incurred; significant renewals and
F-7
137
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
betterments are capitalized. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the various classes of property and
equipment as follows:
Headends............................................... 15 years
Telephone switches..................................... 10 years
Distribution systems and enhancements.................. 15 years
Computer software and equipment........................ 4 years
Other.................................................. 5 to 10 years
Management routinely evaluates its recorded investments for impairment in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of" based on projected undiscounted cash flows and other methods
when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Management believes the investments to be
recoverable.
Intangible Assets -- Costs associated with licensing fees, commissions and
other direct costs incurred in connection with the execution of rights-of-entry
agreements to provide cable television and telecommunications service to MDUs,
the excess of purchase price over the fair value of tangible assets acquired,
goodwill and other intangible assets, are amortized using the straight-line
method over the following estimated useful lives:
Goodwill...................................... 20 years
Licensing fees and rights-of entry costs...... Initial term of contract
Deferred financing costs...................... Terms of indebtedness
Other......................................... 1 to 5 years
Management routinely evaluates its recorded investments for impairment in
accordance with SFAS No. 121 based on projected undiscounted cash flows and
other methods when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable and believes the investments to be
recoverable. Amounts recorded as goodwill have been acquired in the business
combinations discussed in Note 3. Such amounts are generally attributable to
market entry or expansion and are subject to impairment loss evaluation in
accordance with SFAS No. 121.
Federal and State Income Taxes -- Prior to August 2, 1996 the Company and
its corporate subsidiaries filed a consolidated federal income tax return.
Beginning August 2, 1996, in connection with VPC acquiring additional stock from
Vanguard, the Company was included in VPC's consolidated federal income tax
return. Effective February 14, 1997, as the result of issuing Class C Common
(see Notes 6 and 9), the Company will again be required to file a separate
consolidated federal income tax return. During the period in which the Company
was consolidated with VPC, for purposes of financial reporting, the Company has
recorded federal and state income tax as if it were filing a separate return.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the difference between
the tax basis of the assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for
financial reporting purposes, referred to as temporary differences. Provision is
made or benefit recognized for deferred taxes relating to temporary differences
in the recognition of expense and income for financial reporting purposes. To
the extent a deferred tax asset does not meet the criterion of "more likely than
not" for realization, a valuation allowance is recorded.
Revenue Recognition and Deferred Revenue -- The Company recognizes revenue
as cable television programming and telecommunications services are provided to
subscribers. OpTel typically bills customers in
F-8
138
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
advance for monthly cable television services, which results in the deferral of
revenue until those services are provided. Installation revenue is recognized in
the period installation services are provided to the extent of direct selling
costs. For all periods presented, installation revenues have not exceeded direct
selling costs. The Company expenses all initial subscriber costs as incurred due
to the short term subscriber lives associated with MDU service and because such
costs do not constitute additions to property and equipment.
Net Loss Per Common Share -- The computation of basic and diluted loss per
common share is based on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period (see Note 10). No loss per share information is
presented for the period the Company was organized as a partnership. Common
stock equivalents are included in the computation if they are material. Diluted
earnings per share will continue to be calculated in a manner similar to the
historical fully diluted calculation. The diluted loss per common share is
considered to be the same as basic since the effect of the convertible notes
payable to stockholder and common stock equivalents outstanding for each period
presented would be antidilutive. For the period ended August 31, 1995, the years
ended August 31, 1996 and 1997, and the nine month periods ended May 31, 1997
and 1998, the potential dilutive equivalent shares excluded from the diluted
earnings per share calculation because of their antidilutive effect on the
periods reported totaled 197,000, 983,000, 1,425,000, 983,000, and 122,000,
respectively.
Derivative Financial Instruments -- Derivative financial instruments are
utilized by the Company to reduce interest rate risk and include interest rate
swaps. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for
speculative or trading purposes. Gains and losses resulting from the termination
of derivative financial instruments are recognized over the shorter of the
remaining original contract lives of the derivative financial instruments or the
lives of the related hedged positions or, if the hedged positions are sold or
extinguished, are recognized in the current period as gain or loss.
Acquisitions -- Acquisitions accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting include results of operations of the acquired businesses in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements from the dates of acquisition.
Identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are
recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition. The excess of
the purchase price over the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.
Use of Estimates -- The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect reporting amounts of certain assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses. Actual results may differ from such
estimates. The Company is in the initial stages of entering new markets and
acquiring or constructing the infrastructure necessary to deliver cable
television and telecommunication services. The Company's network upgrades and
investment in central office switched telecommunications require significant
investment, a portion of which will not be recovered unless the Company's
customer base increases from current levels, as to which there can be no
assurance because of possible changes due to competition, regulatory changes,
technology changes, the ability to finance future expenditures or other
unforeseen factors. The carrying value of property, equipment, and intangible
assets will be subject to ongoing assessment.
New Accounting Pronouncements -- On September 1, 1996, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for
Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of", which did not have a significant impact on
the Company's results of operations or financial position.
In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share," which established new standards for
computing and presenting earnings per share and was effective for financial
statements issued for periods ending after December 15, 1997, including interim
F-9
139
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
periods. Prior periods presented have been restated to reflect the adoption of
SFAS No. 128 which did not have a significant impact upon the Company's reported
earnings per share.
The FASB issued, in February 1997, SFAS No. 129, "Disclosure of Information
about Capital Structure," which establishes standards for disclosing information
about an entity's capital structure and is effective for financial statements
for periods ending after December 15, 1997.
In June 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive
Income," which establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive
income and its components in the financial statements. SFAS No. 130 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997.
The FASB also issued, in June 1997, SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information," which establishes standards
for the way public companies disclose information about operating segments,
products and services, geographic areas and major customers. SFAS No. 131 is
effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15,
1997.
Reclassifications -- Certain reclassifications of prior year amounts have
been made to conform to the current year presentation.
3. ACQUISITIONS
On December 28, 1994, the Company acquired the stock of the operating
subsidiaries of International Richey Pacific Cablevision, Ltd. ("IRPC") by
assuming approximately $15,500 of liabilities, issuance of a note for $1,000,
payment of approximately $1,300 in cash and issuance of a warrant for the right
to purchase an ownership interest in Vanguard. The $1,000 secured note payable
was due to IRPC one year after closing and was subject to adjustment based on
the actual amount of assumed liabilities. In December 1997, the Company and IRPC
reached an agreement with respect to the actual amount of liabilities assumed.
Also in December 1997, IRPC exercised its right to put the warrant to OpTel. The
obligations for the secured note payable and the warrant were satisfied by the
Company by payment of approximately $1,477. The combined amounts due to IRPC
were included on the accompanying August 31, 1996 and 1997 consolidated balance
sheets in deferred acquisition liabilities. The Company, as a result of the
acquisition from IRPC, is a general partner in limited partnership investments
(the "Partnerships"). The operations of these Partnerships have been
consolidated with those of the Company. The Company has the option to purchase
the interest of each limited partner at defined amounts ranging from 110% to
140% of each limited partner's initial capital contribution for the first four
years of the partnership agreements and is required to purchase the interests at
the end of the fifth year at 150% of the initial capital contribution. From the
date of initial capital contribution until the date the Company purchases the
interest of a limited partner, each limited partner receives a guaranteed return
equal to 10% per annum of their initial capital contribution paid quarterly.
During the periods ended August 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997 OpTel paid $2,114, $392,
and $0, respectively, to repurchase certain partnership obligations (see Note
6). The operations of the acquired subsidiaries and the partnerships are located
in the San Diego, California, and Phoenix, Arizona areas.
On January 11, 1995, the Company purchased the assets of EagleVision, a
division of Nationwide Communications, Inc. ("NCI"). The purchase price
consisted of $15,200 in cash, the assumption of approximately $110 of
liabilities and a deferred payment due to NCI of not less than $6,000 and not
more than $10,000 based on the profitability of OpTel's assets in the Houston,
Texas market with certain adjustments. This deferred payment shall be payable at
NCI's option, either (a) following the sale of all or substantially all of the
EagleVision assets or the sale of a majority of the outstanding voting capital
of the OpTel subsidiary which acquired EagleVision assets to a third party who
is not an affiliate or (b) at the conclusion of the fifth or
F-10
140
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
sixth year following the acquisition. This deferred payment is carried on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets in deferred acquisition liabilities at
the net present value of the estimated final payment with an accretion of
interest recorded to operations. As of the date of acquisition and as of August
31, 1997, the estimated payment due was $6,000 with a net present value at
August 31, 1996 and 1997 of $4,503 and $4,903, respectively. EagleVision's
operations are located in the Houston, Texas area.
On June 30, 1995, the Company purchased the stock of Sunshine Television
Entertainment, Inc. ("Sunshine") for $5,500 in cash and the assumption of
approximately $350 of liabilities. Sunshine's operations are located in the
Miami, Florida area.
On July 31, 1995, the Company purchased the assets of Interface
Communications Group, Inc. and certain related entities ("Interface") for $8,900
in cash and the assumption of approximately $30 of liabilities. The operations
of Interface are located in the Denver, Colorado area.
On August 31, 1995, the Company purchased the general and limited
partnership interests of Triax Associates V, L.P. ("Triax"), for $15,200 in cash
and the assumption of approximately $100 of liabilities. The operations of Triax
are located in the Chicago, Illinois area.
On January 30, 1996, the Company purchased the assets of Telecom Master
L.P. and Telecom Satellite Systems Corporation ("Telecom") for approximately
$5,700 in cash and the assumption of $100 of liabilities. The operations of
Telecom are located in the Dallas, Texas area.
On August 2, 1996, the Company purchased certain assets of certain
subsidiaries of Wireless Holdings, Inc., and Videotron (Bay Area), Inc.,
companies that are 50% and 80% owned and controlled by Videotron, respectively,
for approximately $3,880. The amount paid represents the sellers' historical
cost which also approximates the acquired assets' estimated fair market value.
The operations of the acquired assets are located in the San Francisco,
California, and Tampa, Florida areas.
On November 12, 1996, the Company purchased the assets of Malvey Cable
Company ("Nor-Cal") for approximately $2,500 in cash. The operations of Nor-Cal
are located in the San Francisco, California area.
On March 14, 1997, the Company purchased the stock of Tara Communication
Systems, Inc. ("Tara") for $2,450 in cash and the assumption of approximately
$65 of liabilities. The operations of Tara are located in the Chicago, Illinois
area.
On August 1, 1997, the Company purchased certain assets of Northgate
Communications, Inc. ("Northgate") for approximately $1,700 in cash. The
operations of Northgate are located in the Los Angeles and San Diego, California
areas.
On October 27, 1997, the Company purchased the residential cable television
and associated fiber optic network assets of Phonoscope Ltd. and the stock of
several affiliated entities (collectively "Phonoscope"). The operations of
Phonoscope are in Houston, Texas. The purchase price consisted of $36.5 million
in cash and was recorded as a purchase acquisition.
On March 3, 1998, the Company entered into a definitive purchase agreement
to acquire certain cable television and telephone assets of Interactive Cable
Systems, Inc. ("ICS"). The total purchase price is approximately $80.8 million
and is comprised of approximately $4.5 million of cash, Series B Preferred with
a liquidation preference of $59.4 million, and 164,272 shares of Class A Common
plus assumed liabilities of $.8 million and excluding transaction costs of
approximately $.25 million. As of May 31, 1998, the Company had received
consents and accepted the transfer of legal title to approximately 72% of the
assets which are the
F-11
141
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
subject of the aggregate acquisition. The Company expects the transfer of legal
title for the balance of the acquisition to be completed over the next few
months as ICS meets certain conditions. Approximately 28% of the total purchase
price has been escrowed until ICS meets these conditions. During the period
prior to transferring legal title to these assets, the Company is managing these
assets subject to a management agreement in which the Company receives and
incurs all of the revenues and expenses related to the operations of such
assets. The assets being acquired are located in Houston, Dallas-Fort Worth, San
Diego, Phoenix, Chicago, Denver, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Miami-Ft.
Lauderdale, Tampa-Orlando, Atlanta, Indianapolis and greater Washington, D.C. At
May 31, 1998, the allocation of the purchase price is recorded on a preliminary
basis as follows and is subject to adjustment:
Accounts receivable......................................... $ 1,333
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other assets................. 249
Property and equipment...................................... 30,000
Identifiable intangible assets (Rights of Entry)............ 9,325
Goodwill.................................................... 41,021
Deferred revenue and customer deposits...................... (842)
Capital lease obligations................................... (793)
-------
Total............................................. $80,293
=======
The allocation of the aggregate purchase price reflected in the financial
statements and in the pro forma financial information is preliminary. The final
allocation of the purchase price is contingent upon the final valuation of the
acquired assets and the revision of other estimates; however the allocation is
not expected to differ materially from the preliminary allocation.
The pro forma results presented below have been prepared to illustrate the
effects of the acquisition as if it had occurred on the first day of the periods
presented. The unaudited pro forma adjustments are based upon available
information and certain assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable.
The following pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of
either future results of operations or the results that might have been achieved
if such transactions had been consummated on the indicated dates.
Year Ended Nine Months Ended
August 31, 1997 May 31, 1998
--------------- -----------------
(in thousands, except
per share data)
Total revenues....................................... $ 56,465 $ 55,618
Loss from operations................................. (33,166) (24,202)
Net loss............................................. (59,047) (53,748)
Basic and diluted loss per common share of common
equity............................................. $ (24.60) $ (22.14)
The pro forma effect of the 1996 and 1997 acquisitions would have had an
insignificant impact on the consolidated results of operations of the Company
for the years ended August 31, 1996 and 1997.
F-12
142
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consisted of the following:
AUGUST 31,
------------------- MAY 31,
1996 1997 1998
-------- -------- -----------
(UNAUDITED)
Headends............................................. $ 32,119 $ 53,088 $ 64,188
Telephone switches................................... 4,976 9,347 17,115
Distribution systems and enhancements................ 36,372 68,538 144,707
Computer software and equipment...................... 4,957 9,512 12,180
Other................................................ 5,813 8,762 10,088
Construction in progress............................. 25,434 26,177 29,954
-------- -------- --------
109,671 175,424 278,232
Less accumulated depreciation........................ (5,871) (14,982) (26,908)
-------- -------- --------
$103,800 $160,442 $251,324
======== ======== ========
Interest expense of $1,849 and $2,256 was capitalized during 1996 and 1997
respectively.
5. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets consisted of the following:
AUGUST 31,
------------------ MAY 31,
1996 1997 1998
------- -------- -----------
(UNAUDITED)
Goodwill.............................................. $47,344 $ 53,081 $111,743
Licensing fees and rights-of-entry costs.............. 22,174 30,833 51,406
Deferred financing costs.............................. -- 5,784 11,402
Other................................................. 1,650 3,243 2,392
------- -------- --------
71,168 92,941 176,943
Less accumulated amortization......................... (5,292) (10,358) (16,688)
------- -------- --------
$65,876 $ 82,583 $160,255
======= ======== ========
The Company's right-of-entry agreements represent the Company's agreement
to provide telecommunications service to multiple dwelling units ("MDU's") and
typically have initial terms of ten to fifteen years. The right-of-entry
agreements generally provide for MDU owners to receive an up-front cash payment
and payment of a portion of revenues over the term of the agreement.
F-13
143
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
6. NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
Notes payable and long-term obligations consisted of the following:
AUGUST 31,
----------------- MAY 31,
1996 1997 1998
------ -------- -----------
(UNAUDITED)
13% Senior Notes Due 2005, Series B, net of
unamortized discount of $0, $6,526 and $5,870....... $ -- $218,474 $219,130
Senior credit facility bearing interest at LIBOR plus
3.5% per annum, payable quarterly, collateralized by
substantially all of the assets of the Company...... -- -- 125,000
Installment notes payable bearing interest at rates
ranging from 7.75% to 13% per annum, substantially
all collateralized by certain transportation
equipment or private cable television systems....... 511 280 178
Limited partner obligations (see Note 3).............. 633 714 773
Obligations under capital leases, net of amounts
representing interest of $355 and $581 for 1996 and
1997, respectively.................................. 1,299 2,185 3,552
------ -------- --------
$2,443.. $221,653 $348,633
====== ======== ========
On February 14, 1997, the Company issued $225.0 million of 13% Senior Notes
Due 2005 ("1997 Notes"). The 1997 Notes require semiannual interest payments due
on August 15 and February 15 of each year until their maturity on February 15,
2005. The 1997 Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company generally at a
premium at any time after February 15, 2002 and can be redeemed, in part, also
at a premium, earlier upon the occurrence of certain defined events. In
addition, a transfer by VPC of its interest in OpTel or a transfer by Videotron
of its interest in VPC or an election by VPC to convert its Class B Common into
shares of Class A Common may result in a change of control under the indenture,
which could require the Company to purchase the 1997 Notes. The 1997 Notes are
unsecured.
In connection with the issuance of the 1997 Notes, the Company issued
225,000 shares of Class C Common. The portion of the net proceeds allocated to
the Class C Common is $7 million. Such amount has been recorded as stockholders'
equity and as a discount to the 1997 Notes. As a result of issuing the Class C
Common, the Company will no longer be included in VPC's consolidated federal
income tax return.
Concurrent with the issuance of the 1997 Notes, the Company was required to
deposit in an escrow account $79.6 million in cash that, together with the
proceeds from such investment, will be sufficient to pay when due the first six
interest payments on the 1997 Notes. Such amount is reflected as restricted
investments on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
In December 1997, the Company, through subsidiaries, secured a $150 million
senior secured credit facility (the "Senior Facility") from a syndicate of
financial institutions. The Senior Facility consists of a term loan in the
amount of $125.0 million (which was drawn on December 19, 1997) bearing interest
at LIBOR plus 3.5% and a $25.0 million revolving credit commitment. The Senior
Facility is secured by a first fixed and floating lien on substantially all of
the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Senior Facility contains
financial maintenance requirements and certain limitations on the Company's
ability to incur indebtedness,
F-14
144
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
maximum capital expenditures, and pay dividends. The Company is in compliance
with, or has obtained waivers for, all covenants of the Senior Facility.
To comply with certain covenants of the Senior Facility and to reduce the
impact of changes in interest rates on the Senior Facility, the Company entered
into interest rate swap agreements with total notional amounts of $75 million in
which the Company has agreed to receive a variable rate equal to LIBOR and pay
fixed rates ranging from 5.96% to 6.00%. The swap agreements expire March 31,
2001. At May 31, 1998, the fair value of the swap agreement is a net loss
position of $600. The swap agreements were terminated on July 17, 1998 in
exchange for cash payments of $578,000.
Aggregate maturities of the Company's indebtedness are as follows as of
August 31, 1997:
NOTES PAYABLE CONVERTIBLE DEFERRED
AND NOTES PAYABLE ACQUISITION
LONG-TERM TO STOCKHOLDER LIABILITIES
OBLIGATIONS (NOTE 9) (NOTE 3) TOTAL
------------- -------------- ----------- --------
Fiscal year ending:
1998............................... $ 1,587 $ -- $2,017 $ 3,604
1999............................... 811 -- -- 811
2000............................... 530 -- 4,903 5,433
2001............................... 249 -- -- 249
2002............................... 2 -- -- 2
Thereafter........................... 218,474 129,604 -- 348,078
-------- -------- ------ --------
Totals..................... $221,653 $129,604 $6,920 $358,177
======== ======== ====== ========
As of May 31, 1998, Notes Payable and Long-Term Obligations increased
primarily due to $125 million of borrowings under the Senior Facility with an
original maturity of August 2004. On July 8, 1998, the Company repaid the Senior
Facility with proceeds from a private placement of $200 million 11.5% Senior
Notes due 2008. On March 1, 1998, the Convertible Notes Payable to Stockholders
were converted to Series A Preferred Stock.
The Company leases office space and certain equipment under operating and
capital leases. The leases generally have initial terms of 3 to 20 years.
Equipment acquired under capital leases consists of the following:
AUGUST 31,
---------------
1996 1997
------ ------
Amount of equipment under capital leases.................... $1,717 $3,069
Less accumulated amortization............................... (298) (470)
------ ------
$1,419 $2,599
====== ======
F-15
145
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
Minimum future obligations on operating leases at August 31, 1997, consist
of the following:
Fiscal year ending:
1998............................................. $ 2,474
1999............................................. 2,285
2000............................................. 1,880
2001............................................. 1,546
2002............................................. 1,218
Thereafter......................................... 3,646
-------
Total minimum lease payments............. $13,049
=======
Rental expense under operating leases for the periods ending August 31,
1995, 1996 and 1997 was $616, $2,158 and $2,763, respectively. The company's
rental expense under operating leases includes facility rentals as well as
rental of roof top space for distribution purposes.
7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Employment and Consulting Agreements -- Employment agreements with certain
executive employees provide for separation payments ranging from 3 to 24 months
of the employee's annual salary if employment is terminated due to change of
control or without cause. However, stipulations for termination payment and
payment terms vary. The Company paid or accrued approximately $1,590, $297 and
$278 in severance during 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively, related to such
employment agreements.
Legal -- The Company is a defendant in certain lawsuits incurred in the
ordinary course of business. It is the opinion of the Company's management that
the outcome of the suits now pending will not have a material, adverse effect on
the operations, cash flows or the consolidated financial position of the
Company.
On April 9, 1998, a purported class action complaint was filed in the
District Court of Harris County, Texas by Gavin Stewart Clarkson, individually
and on behalf of all cable subscribers in the U.S. that have paid late fees to
either Phonoscope or the Company. The plaintiff, who formerly subscribed to
cable television services provided by Phonoscope, alleges that Phonoscope's
charging pre-established late fees for delinquent payments of cable subscription
charges constitutes an illegal collection of a penalty and that cable service
providers should only be entitled to their actual collection costs. The
plaintiff seeks to enjoin Phonoscope and OpTel from collecting, or attempting to
collect, such late fees. The case is in its very early stages and no assurance
can be given as to its ultimate outcome or that any such outcome will not
materially adversely affect the Company. OpTel believes that it will have
meritorious factual and legal defenses, and intends to defend vigorously against
these claims.
On April 27, 1998, a civil action was commenced against the Company in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of California by Octel
Communication Corp ("Octel"), charging the Company with trademark infringement,
trade name infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition based on its
use of the name "OpTel" the ("Civil Action") and seeking to enjoin the Company
from using the name "OpTel." The Civil Action follows a now-suspended
administrative proceeding in the Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") relating to
registration of the "OpTel" mark by the Company. The PTO found the Company's
application for registration to be allowable; however, Octel commenced the PTO
proceeding claiming that the Company's mark is confusingly similar to the
"Octel" mark used by that party in a related field, and claiming that the
Company's application had procedural deficiencies. During the course of the PTO
F-16
146
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
proceeding, the Company acquired rights to the marks "Optel" and "Optel
Communications" in the telecommunications field which are believed to predate
the rights of Octel to its trademark, and the Company commenced two further
proceedings against Octel in the PTO seeking cancellation of two of the
trademark registrations owned by Octel. The various proceedings in the PTO
between the Company and Octel were consolidated and thereafter suspended on May
15, 1998, in view of the commencement of the civil action. The Company believes
it has meritorious counterclaims in the Civil Action and intends to vigorously
defend against Octel's claims. Although the Company does not believe that its
use of the name "OpTel" infringes on the trademark or trade name rights of Octel
or any other person, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of the Civil
Action or the proceedings in the PTO (if reinstated) or that any such outcome
would not materially adversely affect the Company.
8. INCOME TAXES
The cumulative losses of Vanguard incurred prior to the transfer of its
assets to the Company on December 20, 1994, have been reported in the individual
income tax returns of Vanguard's partners. Upon transfer, the Company recorded
deferred taxes for the difference between the tax and book basis of the assets,
which was not material. Upon acquisition of the stock of the IRPC subsidiaries,
a deferred tax liability of $489 was recorded to recognize the excess of the
basis in the assets for financial reporting purposes over the tax basis of the
net assets acquired. During the period from January 1, 1995, to August 31, 1995,
the Company accumulated losses sufficient to offset these deferred liabilities;
accordingly, a tax benefit was recorded in the statement of operations.
Additionally, during the period ended August 31, 1995, the Company incurred $19
of federal and state income tax expense.
Income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following for the period from
January 1, 1995 to August 31, 1995 and the years ended August 31, 1996 and 1997:
1995 1996 1997
-------- ------- -------
Current:
Federal.............................................. $ -- $ -- $ --
State................................................ 19 -- --
-------- ------- -------
Total current tax expense.................... 19 -- --
Deferred tax expense (benefit)......................... (3,452) (4,470) (13,213)
Change in deferred tax valuation allowance............. 2,963 4,470 13,213
-------- ------- -------
Total income tax expense (benefit)........... $ (470) $ -- $ --
======== ======= =======
F-17
147
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
A reconciliation of income taxes on reported pretax loss at statutory rates
to actual income tax expense (benefit) for the period from January 1, 1995 to
August 31, 1995 and the years ended August 31, 1996 and 1997, is as follows:
1995 1996 1997
---------------- --------------- ----------------
Income tax at statutory rates.......... $ (3,614) (34)% $(6,266) (34)% $(16,502) (34)%
State income taxes, net of federal tax
benefit.............................. 12 0 (1) 0 8 0
Valuation allowance.................... 2,963 28 4,470 24 13,213 27
Expenses (deductible) not deductible
for tax purposes..................... 169 2 1,797 10 (842) (2)
Utilization of current loss by parent
company in consolidated return....... -- -- -- -- 4,123 9
-------- --- ------- --- -------- ---
Total income tax benefit..... $ (470) (4)% $ -- 0% $ -- 0%
======== === ======= === ======== ===
The net deferred tax assets consist of the tax effects of temporary
differences related to the following:
AUGUST 31,
---------------------------
1996 1997
------------ -----------
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable.......... $ 184 $ 381
Equipment, furniture and fixtures........................ (4,540) (10,694)
Intangible assets........................................ 105 421
Accrued employee compensation............................ 183 214
Net operating loss carryforwards......................... 12,372 31,121
IRPC deferred tax liability.............................. (488) (480)
Other.................................................... (16) 59
------------ -----------
Deferred tax asset before valuation allowance.......... 7,800 21,022
Valuation allowance.................................... (7,800) (21,022)
------------ -----------
Net deferred tax asset......................... $ -- $ --
============ ===========
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on generating sufficient
taxable income prior to expiration of the loss carryforwards. The Company is
unable to determine whether these accumulated losses will be utilized;
accordingly, a valuation allowance has been provided.
The following are the expiration dates and the approximate net operating
loss carryforwards at August 31, 1997:
Expiration Dates Through:
2010.......................................... $ 1,346
2011.......................................... 11,521
2012.......................................... 26,161
2013.......................................... 52,504
Certain of the Company's net operating losses were utilized by VPC while
the Company was included in VPC's consolidated tax return. Such losses will not
be available for future use by the Company, and, accordingly, the deferred tax
benefit and valuation allowance were reduced. In connection with the revised
F-18
148
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
shareholder agreement (see Note 9), subsequent to August 31, 1997, the Company
will be reimbursed for any tax benefit generated by the Company and utilized by
VPC.
9. CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE TO STOCKHOLDER, STOCK ISSUANCE AND OTHER
TRANSACTIONS WITH STOCKHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTIES
From December 22, 1994 through March 31, 1995, the Company borrowed $60,000
from VPC under a Senior Secured Convertible Note Agreement. The note, with an
original maturity of June 30, 1996, and the accrued interest of $792 for the
period from December 22, 1994 until conversion on March 31, 1995, was converted
to 1,120,985 shares of Class B Common of OpTel on March 31, 1995. Concurrently,
VPC purchased 105,667 shares of OpTel's Class B Common from Vanguard.
Additionally, the Company incurred $1,587 of costs related to this conversion of
debt which was charged to additional paid-in capital.
On July 26, 1995, VPC invested $25,000 in the Company, of which $16,688
represented VPC's purchase of an additional 311,652 shares of OpTel's Class B
Common, and $8,312 represented a convertible note payable that bore interest at
15% and was convertible to 155,229 shares of Class B Common at the option of VPC
on November 15, 1995 (extended to January 29, 1996). In connection with the July
26, 1995, equity call, Vanguard had the option to fund its portion to maintain
its ownership interest at 33.25% by November 15, 1995 (extended to January 29,
1996). The Company was required to use the proceeds from any Vanguard
contribution to repay the convertible note. On January 29, 1996, Vanguard
elected to let the option expire without funding its portion of the equity call.
On April 1, 1996, VPC converted the $8,312 note and accrued interest of $854
into 155,229 shares of Class B Common.
From August 1995 through August 1997, the Company issued a total of
$131,400 in convertible notes ("Convertible Notes") to VPC, all of which bear
interest at 15%, generally with principal and interest due on demand. Under the
terms of the Convertible Notes, any accrued interest on which there is no demand
for payment as of each August 31, automatically converts to additional principal
payable. As of August 31, 1997, $106,678 was advanced to OpTel under the
Convertible Notes and a total of $22,926 of interest on the Convertible Notes
has been converted to principal to date. As of February 28, 1998 an additional
$9,640 of interest on the Convertible Notes has been converted to principle. The
principal and interest on Convertible Notes were convertible into Class B Common
after the earlier to occur of an initial public offering or April 30, 1999.
As of March 1, 1998, VPC converted its Convertible Notes payable, including
accrued interest, of $139.2 million into a like amount of Series A Preferred.
Such stock earns dividends at the annual rate of 9.75%, payable in additional
shares of Series A Preferred, and is convertible under certain circumstances and
at certain prices at the option of the holder of the shares into shares of Class
B Common upon consummation of an initial public offering.
Videotron is party to an indenture which limits the aggregate amount of
indebtedness which can be incurred by Videotron and its subsidiaries, including
the Company, taken as a whole (based upon a ratio of total consolidated
indebtedness to consolidated operating cash flow).
In August 1997, in connection with a revised shareholder agreement, Capital
Communication CDPQ, Inc. ("CDPQ"), a minority stockholder of Videotron, acquired
all of Vanguard's interest in OpTel. Immediately prior to the sale to CDPQ,
Vanguard exercised an option to purchase 48,937 shares of Class B Common at an
exercise price of $53.55 per share, subject to adjustment, that had been granted
to Vanguard in August 1996. The option exercise resulted in the Company
receiving $2,620 in cash.
F-19
149
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
In connection with the sale by Vanguard of its minority stock position in
the Company to CDPQ, the Company, VPC and CDPQ entered into the Stockholders'
Agreement and the Company and CDPQ entered into a related Registration Rights
Agreement (the "Registration Rights Agreement"), under which CDPQ has certain
rights and obligations relating to the Company and VPC.
Under the Stockholders' Agreement, for as long as CDPQ holds at least 5% of
the Company's voting stock, CDPQ may designate a number of Directors of the
Company and each of its subsidiaries, and each committee of the Board and each
of its subsidiaries, which is proportionate (in relation to the total number of
Directors or committee members) to CDPQ's percentage ownership of the Company's
voting stock, but in no event less than one Director and one committee member.
Pursuant to the Stockholders' Agreement, VPC is obligated to cause the Company
to afford CDPQ rights equivalent to those afforded other purchasers of the
Company's capital stock to the extent they are more advantageous than the rights
held by CDPQ. Subject to certain exceptions (including a public offering of the
Company's equity securities) and waiver by CDPQ at VPC's request in connection
with certain events, the Company is obligated to afford CDPQ preemptive rights
to purchase equity securities which the Company proposes to sell in proportion
to CDPQ's ownership of the total outstanding equity securities of the Company
prior to the sale. In addition, pursuant to the Stockholders' Agreement, CDPQ
has certain tag-along rights in connection with sales by VPC of outstanding
shares of the Company's voting stock. Pursuant to the Registration Rights
Agreement, nine months after the consummation of the Offering and, subject to
certain conditions, CDPQ has the right, on two occasions, to require the Company
to register under the Securities Act shares of Class A Common Stock issued to
CDPQ upon the conversion of the Multi-Vote Common. In addition, CDPQ has
piggyback registration rights, on three occasions, to include such shares of
Class A Common Stock held by it in registration statements filed by the Company
for the sale of its equity securities, subject to certain conditions, including
customary allocation and holdback provisions.
The Company has assigned substantially all of its frequency licenses to
THI, an entity owned by an employee of the Company and two individuals who
provide legal counsel to the Company, in exchange for a $1.0 million secured
promissory note with interest at 8% due on February 14, 2007 (the "License
Note"). The License Note contains covenants which restrict THI from, among other
things, incurring indebtedness other than to the Company or in the ordinary
course of business, and merging or consolidating with another entity.
The terms of the Company's continued and unencumbered use of the frequency
licenses are subject to a license and services agreement (the "THI Agreement")
pursuant to which THI agreed to provide to the Company all the transmission
capacity it requires or may in the future require and the Company granted THI a
nonexclusive license to use all of the Company's facilities and related
equipment, such as microwave transmitting and receiving equipment, required to
provide such transmission capacity.
The Company received an option from THI to purchase all or, in certain
circumstances, some of the assets of THI at a price equal to the principal
balance on the License Note plus accrued interest at 10% per annum and a
separate option from each stockholder of THI to purchase all of such person's
shares of capital stock of THI at the lesser of (x) the book value of the shares
being purchased and (y) the price paid for such shares plus a 10% premium
compounded annually. The THI option and the individual options are exercisable
at any time prior to February 14, 2007, subject to FCC approval.
THI is included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company
based upon the Company's ability to control THI as a result of a combination of
the covenants contained in the License Note and the Company's ability to
exercise its option to purchase the assets or stock of THI. The option agreement
and the License Note are eliminated upon consolidation.
F-20
150
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
In September 1996, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a
former director of the Company who is a limited partner of Vanguard. In
connection therewith, the Company granted him a warrant to purchase up to 24,992
shares of Class A Common at an exercise price of $53.55 per share, subject to
adjustment, that is presently exercisable and expires on August 31, 1999.
VPC and an affiliate of Vanguard had each agreed to provide consultant,
advisory and management services for $350 per annum (plus travel expenses) per
party. This arrangement terminated in August 1997 with the sale of Vanguard's
interest in the Company.
The Company purchases certain insurance coverage through Videotron,
including directors and officers liability insurance. The Company paid an
aggregate of approximately $478,000 and $434,000 to Videotron for this insurance
coverage in fiscal 1996 and 1997, respectively.
Pursuant to the terms of the Stockholders' Agreement, VPC and certain of
its affiliates provide certain strategic planning and treasury support services
to the Company and perform internal audits of the Company's operations.
Additional services may be provided as and when requested by the Company. The
Company is charged for such services based on an estimate of the actual cost of
the personnel engaged and materials used to provide such services (without an
allowance for profit).
In addition, OpTel provides certain customer support and billing services
to certain affiliates of Videotron which operate wireless cable systems using
MMDS technology. OpTel charges such affiliates based on the actual cost of the
personnel engaged and materials used to provide such services.
10. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
The Class A Common, Class B Common and Class C Common of the Company are
identical in all respects and have equal powers, preferences, rights and
privileges except that each holder of Class A Common is entitled to one vote for
each share of Class A Common held, each holder of Class B Common is entitled to
ten votes for each share of Class B Common held, and each holder of Class C
Common does not possess any voting privileges. VPC and CDPQ are the only holders
of Class B Common and, upon any transfer other than to a permitted holder, the
Class B Common automatically converts to a like number of shares of Class A
Common.
On February 7, 1997 the Company approved a stock split effected in the form
of a stock dividend. Each share of outstanding Class B Common (the only class of
common stock then outstanding) received 17.3768 additional shares. The number of
authorized shares of Class A Common and Class B Common was increased to
8,000,000 and 6,000,000, respectively. The financial statements have been
restated to reflect the stock split as if it had occurred on December 20, 1994,
the date the Company reorganized as a corporation. Additionally, the Company
authorized the issuance of 300,000 shares of Class C Common.
The Series B Preferred is convertible into Class A Common based upon the
liquidation preference plus any cumulative unpaid dividends at the time of the
conversion divided by the share price upon consummation of an initial public
offering.
11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
401(k) Plan -- The OpTel 401(k) Plan (the "Plan"), established January 1,
1995, conforms to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974. It is a contributory tax deferred 401(k)
F-21
151
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
plan. All employees are eligible and may enter the Plan on the first day of the
first full month of employment, provided that they have attained the age of 21.
Each participant my elect to defer up to 15% of annual compensation up to
the annual contribution limit of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company matching
contribution is a discretionary amount to be annually determined by the Board of
Directors of the Company. The Company determined that, for the plan years ended
December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, it would match 50% of its employees' elective
contribution (to a maximum Company contribution of 3% of the employees'
compensation). For the periods ended August 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, the
Company's match of its employees' elective contributions was $81, $188 and $289,
respectively.
12. RESTRICTED INVESTMENTS
Concurrent with the issuance of the 1997 Notes, the Company was required to
deposit in an escrow account $79.6 million in cash that was subsequently
invested in U.S. Treasury securities. The securities are classified as
held-to-maturity and, at August 31, 1997, have an amortized cost basis of
$67,206, and aggregate fair value of $67,233, and gross unrealized holding gains
of $27. The contractual maturity of the securities correspond to the semi-annual
interest payment dates required under the 1997 Notes through February 15, 2000.
13. EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
During the year ended August 31, 1997 the Company adopted a stock option
and award plan for the benefit of officers and key employees. The plan is
administered by a committee of the Board of Directors. The plan authorizes the
Board to issue incentive stock options, as defined in Section 422A(b) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and stock options which
do not conform to the requirements of that Code section. The Board has
discretionary authority to determine the types of options to be granted, the
persons to whom options shall be granted, the number of shares to be subject to
each option granted and the terms of the stock option agreements. Unless
otherwise specifically provided in the option agreement, (i) the exercise price
of an option will not be less than the fair market value, as determined by the
Board, of the Class A Common on the date of grant and (ii) the options vest in
equal installments on each of the second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries
of the date of grant. The options issued as of August 31, 1997, expire ten years
from the date of grant. In the event of a "change in control," all options shall
vest and become immediately exercisable. The Board has authorized 95,137 shares
of Class A Common to be issued under the
F-22
152
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
plan. Stock option activity under the plan and warrants issued (see Note 9) for
the year ended August 31, 1997, was as follows:
NUMBER OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE
SHARES PRICE PER SHARE PRICE PER SHARE
--------- --------------- ----------------
Options and warrants outstanding at August
31, 1996................................. -- -- --
Granted.................................... 112,115 $53.55 to $85.75 $76.70
Exercised.................................. -- -- --
Forfeited.................................. 22,078 $53.55 to $85.75 $80.92
-------
Options and warrants outstanding at August
31, 1997................................. 90,037 $53.55 to $85.75 $75.66
-------
Granted.................................... 42,984 $85.75 $85.75
Exercised.................................. -- -- --
Forfeited.................................. (9,336) $85.75 $85.75
-------
Options and warrants outstanding at May 31,
1998, (including 35,127 warrants)........ 123,685 $53.55 to $85.75 $78.40
=======
Options and warrants exercisable at August
31, 1997................................. 27,095 $53.55 to $85.75 $56.05
Options available for grant at August 31,
1997..................................... 30,092
The weighted average remaining contractual life of the stock options
outstanding at August 31, 1997 is nine years.
At August 31, 1997, the Company has reserved a total of 65,045 and 24,992
shares of Class A Common for issuance upon the exercise of stock options and
stock warrants, respectively. The Company has also granted stock warrants in
connection with an agreement to provide consulting services (see Note 9).
The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees" in accounting for its stock option and award plan and the stock
warrants. During 1997, the exercise price of each option granted was greater
than or equal to the estimated fair value of the Company's stock on the date of
grant. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized under this plan.
For the year ended August 31, 1997, the difference between actual net loss and
loss per share and net loss and loss per share on a proforma basis as if the
Company had utilized the accounting methodology prescribed by SFAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," would have been $44 and $.02 per
share, respectively.
The estimated weighted average grant date fair value of options and
warrants granted during 1997 was $1.10 per share. For purposes of determining
fair value of each option, the Company used the minimum value method using the
following assumptions:
Risk-free interest rate..................... 6.18% -- 6.88%
Expected life............................... 3 to 10 years
F-23
153
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
14. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial
instruments is made in accordance with the requirement of SFAS No. 107,
"Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial Instruments." The estimated fair value
amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information
and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is
necessarily required to interpret market data to develop estimates of fair
value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily
indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current market
exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation
methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
AUGUST 31, 1996 AUGUST 31, 1997
----------------------- -----------------------
CARRYING ESTIMATED CARRYING ESTIMATED
AMOUNT FAIR VALUE AMOUNT FAIR VALUE
-------- ---------- -------- ----------
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................... $ 1,677 $ 1,677 $ 87,305 $ 87,305
Restricted investments...................... -- -- 67,206 67,233
Accounts receivable......................... 3,064 3,064 4,044 4,044
Liabilities:
Accounts payable............................ 5,649 5,649 7,927 7,927
Customer deposits and deferred revenue...... 2,167 2,167 2,978 2,978
Convertible notes payable to stockholder.... 89,414 89,415 129,604 129,605
Notes payable and long-term obligations..... 2,443 2,445 221,653 228,650
Deferred acquisition liabilities............ 6,520 6,525 6,920 6,920
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and customer deposits and deferred revenue approximates fair
value. The fair values of convertible notes payable to stockholder, certain
notes payable and long-term obligations and deferred acquisition liabilities are
estimated based on present values using applicable market discount rates or
rates that approximate what the Company could obtain from the open market. The
fair value of restricted investments and the 1997 Notes are based on quoted
market prices. The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent
information available to management as of August 31, 1996 and 1997. Although
management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the
estimated fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively
revalued for purposes of these financial statements since the date presented,
and therefore, current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the
amounts presented herein.
F-24
154
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
15. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996
---------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER THIRD QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER
------------- -------------- ------------- --------------
Revenues................................. $ 5,825 $ 6,463 $ 7,320 $ 7,996
Operating Expenses....................... $ 8,000 $ 9,395 $ 10,320 $ 12,465
Other Expense............................ $ 614 $ 1,522 $ 1,573 $ 2,145
Net Income (Loss)........................ $(2,789) $(4,454) $ (4,573) $ (6,614)
Basic and diluted loss per common
share.................................. $ (1.30) $ (2.07) $ (2.02) $ (2.86)
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding............................ 2,149 2,149 2,263 2,315
YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997
---------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER THIRD QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER
------------- -------------- ------------- --------------
Revenues................................. $ 9,076 $ 9,546 $ 10,495 $ 10,720
Operating expenses....................... $12,693 $14,096 $ 17,003 $ 18,841
Other expense............................ $ 3,277 $ 4,849 $ 8,867 $ 8,746
Net income (loss)........................ $(6,894) $(9,399) $(15,375) $(16,867)
Basic and diluted loss per common
share.................................. $ (2.99) $ (4.01) $ (6.08) $ (6.65)
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding............................ 2,305 2,342 2,530 2,538
16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (UNAUDITED)
On July 9, 1998, Optel consummated a private placement of $200.0 million of
11 1/2% Senior Notes Due 2008 (the "1998 Notes"). The 1998 Notes require
semiannual interest payments on January 1 and July 1 of each year until their
maturity on July 1, 2008. The 1998 Notes are redeemable at the option of the
Company, generally at a premium, at any time after July 1, 2003 and can be
redeemed in part, also at a premium, earlier upon the occurrence of certain
defined events. Concurrent with the issuance of the 1998 Notes, the Company was
required to deposit in an escrow account $22.0 million in cash that, together
with the proceeds of the investment thereof, will be sufficient to pay when due
the first two interest payments on the 1998 Notes.
In fiscal 1998, the Company adopted amendments to the incentive Stock Plan,
certain of which will become effective, subject to stockholder approval, on the
date of an initial public offering (the "Offering") is consummated (as so
amended, the "Plan"). Five percent of the Class A Common Stock outstanding, on a
fully diluted basis, on the date the Offering is consummated, may be issued
under the terms of the Plan.
In fiscal 1998, the Company adopted the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(the "Stock Purchase Plan") which is intended to qualify as an "employee stock
purchase plan" under Section 423 of the Code. The Stock Purchase Plan will
become effective, subject to stockholder approval, on the date the Offering is
consummated. One percent of the Class A Common Stock outstanding, on a fully
diluted basis, on the date the Offering is consummated, will be issuable under
the terms of the Stock Purchase Plan.
Each Director who is neither an employee of the Company nor a designee of
the Company's significant stockholders will receive options to purchase shares
of Class A Common Stock having an aggregate value of $150 upon consummation of
the Offering (or, if such Director is not serving in such capacity upon
F-25
155
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
TO AUGUST 31, 1995 AND THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND 1997,
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED),
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS -- (CONTINUED)
consummation of the Offering, on the date of his or her election to the Board)
with an exercise price equal to the initial public offering price (or the fair
market value on the date of grant). The options will become exercisable in equal
installments on each of the second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the
effective date of the grant.
Following the consummation of the offering, all of the outstanding shares
of the Company's Class C Common Stock, and Series A and B Preferred Stock will
be converted to Class A Common Stock.
F-26
156
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following unaudited pro forma information is based on the historical
financial statements of the Company and the historical financial statements of
the assets and liabilities of ICS Communications, L.L.C. (the "ICS Operations")
acquired by the OpTel, Inc. ("Company").
The pro forma statements of operations for the year ended August 31, 1997
and the nine months ended May 31, 1998 have been prepared to illustrate the
effects of the acquisition and the Notes Offering and the Senior Credit Facility
Retirement as if they had occurred on the first day of the periods presented.
Pro forma balance sheet information is not included as the historical balance
sheet of the Company as of May 31, 1998 reflects the consummation of the
acquisition of the ICS Operations. The unaudited pro forma adjustments are based
upon available information and certain assumptions that the Company believes are
reasonable. The pro forma financial information and accompanying notes should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and other
financial information included elsewhere herein pertaining to the Company and
the ICS Operations, including "Capitalization" and "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." The pro forma
financial information is not necessarily indicative of either future results of
operations or the results that might have been achieved if such transactions had
been consummated on the indicated dates.
The acquisition of the ICS Operations was accounted for using the purchase
method of accounting. The aggregate purchase price was allocated to the tangible
and intangible assets and liabilities acquired based upon their respective fair
values. The allocation of the aggregate purchase price reflected in the pro
forma financial information is preliminary, the final allocation of the purchase
price is contingent upon the final valuation of the acquired assets and the
revision of other estimates; however, the allocation is not expected to differ
materially from the preliminary allocation.
F-27
157
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS -- YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997
(UNAUDITED)
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
HISTORICAL
----------------------------------- PRO FORMA COMPANY
COMPANY ICS OPERATIONS ADJUSTMENTS PRO FORMA
--------------- ----------------- ----------- ---------
(A) (B)
REVENUES:
Cable television.......................................... $ 36,915 $14,419 $ $ 51,334
Telecommunications........................................ 2,922 2,209 5,131
-------- ------- -------- --------
Total revenues..................................... 39,837 16,628 56,465
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Programming, access fees and revenue sharing.............. 19,202 8,947 28,149
Customer support, general and administrative.............. 28,926 5,518 1,086(E) 35,530
Depreciation and amortization............................. 14,505 8,089 3,358(F) 25,952
-------- ------- -------- --------
Total operating expenses........................... 62,633 22,554 4,444 89,631
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS........................................ (22,796) (5,926) (4,444) (33,166)
Interest expense on -- Convertible Notes.................... (15,204) (15,204)
Other interest expense...................................... (16,210) (142) (23,000)(H) (39,352)
Interest and other income................................... 5,675 5,675
-------- ------- -------- --------
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES.................................... (48,535) (6,068) (27,444) (82,047)
INCOME TAXES................................................
-------- ------- -------- --------
NET LOSS.................................................... $(48,535) $(6,068) $(27,444) $(82,047)
-------- ------- -------- --------
DIVIDENDS ON PREFERRED SHARES:
Series B Preferred Stock 8.0%............................. (4,757)(G) $ (4,757)
-------- --------
LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON EQUITY.......................... $(48,535) $(86,804)
======== ========
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE............................ $ (19.98) $ (33.46)
======== ========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING......................... 2,430 2,594(D)
======== ========
See notes to unaudited pro forma financial information.
F-28
158
OPTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1998
(UNAUDITED)
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
HISTORICAL
------------------------------------- PRO FORMA COMPANY
COMPANY ICS OPERATIONS ADJUSTMENTS PRO FORMA
----------------- ----------------- ----------- ---------
(A) (C)
REVENUES:
Cable television.......................................... $ 42,195 $ 9,613 $ $ 51,808
Telecommunications........................................ 2,721 1,089 3,810
-------- ------- -------- --------
Total revenues..................................... 44,916 10,702 55,618
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Programming, access fees and revenue sharing.............. 20,213 4,817 25,030
Customer support, general and administrative.............. 25,044 2,985 832(E) 28,861
Depreciation and amortization............................. 18,432 4,979 2,519(F) 25,930
-------- ------- -------- --------
Total operating expenses........................... 63,689 12,781 3,351 79,821
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS........................................ (18,773) (2,079) (3,351) (24,203)
Interest expense on Convertible Notes....................... (9,640) (9,640)
Other interest expense...................................... (26,276) (86) (12,243)(H) (38,605)
Interest and other income................................... 6,457 6,457
-------- ------- -------- --------
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES.................................... (48,232) (2,165) (15,594) (65,991)
INCOME TAXES................................................
-------- ------- -------- --------
NET LOSS.................................................... $(48,232) $(2,165) $(15,594) $(65,991)
-------- ------- -------- --------
DIVIDENDS ON PREFERRED STOCK:............................... (4,068) (2,894)(G) $ (6,962)
-------- -------- --------
LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON EQUITY.......................... $(52,300) $(72,953)
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE............................ $ (20.04) $ (26.61)
======== ========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING......................... 2,610 2,742(D)
======== ========
See notes to unaudited pro forma financial information.
F-29
159
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
(A) Represents the historical consolidated statement of operations of the
Company for the period indicated which includes the results of the ICS
Operations after the date of acquisition.
(B) Represents the unaudited statement of revenues and direct expenses of the
ICS Operations for the year ended November 30, 1997. Such presentation is
made to conform to the Company's quarter ended November 30, 1997 and were
derived from the financial records of ICS using the audited December 31,
1997, statement of revenues and direct expenses adjusted for the exclusion
of total revenues of $1,394 and a net loss of $312 for the month ended
December 31, 1997 and inclusion of total revenues of $1,335 and a net loss
of $718 for the month ended December 31, 1996. The amounts include amounts
representing allocated regional overhead attributable to the acquired
operations. The statement of revenues and direct expenses include only the
results of operations for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and
do not include any amounts representing corporate overhead of ICS or
interest incurred on liabilities not assumed by the Company. Total revenues
of $4,316 and net losses of $973 for the months ended November 31, 1997,
October 31, 1997 and September 30, 1997 have been included in both the pro
forma statement of operations for the year ended August 31, 1997 and the
pro forma statement of operations for the nine months ended May 31, 1998.
(C) Represents the unaudited statement of revenues and direct expenses of the
acquired ICS Operations for the period from September 1, 1997 through the
date of acquisition after which date, the ICS Operations are included in
the historical statement of operations of the Company, and were derived
from the financial records of ICS. The statement of revenues and direct
expenses include only the results of operations for the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed and do not include any amounts representing corporate
overhead of ICS or interest incurred on liabilities not assumed by the
Company. The amounts do include amounts representing allocated regional
overhead attributable to the acquired operations. Total revenues of $4,316
and net losses of $973 for the months ended November 31, 1997, October 31,
1997 and September 30, 1997 have been included in both the pro forma
statement of operations for the year ended August 31, 1997 and the pro
forma statement of operations for the nine months ended May 31, 1998.
(D) Represents the issuance of 164,272 shares of Class A Common, $.01 par value
at an estimated price per share of $98 and total fair value of $16,099 to
purchase the ICS Operations.
(E) Represents incremental customer support, corporate and administrative
expenses not included in the historical financial statements of the
acquired ICS Operations as such functions were not acquired by the Company.
The amounts have been estimated based upon the Company's average historical
cost per subscriber for the appropriate period applied to the expected
number of subscribers added as part of the acquisition.
(F) Represents an adjustment to depreciation expense for acquired property and
equipment and to record amortization expense for the acquired intangible
assets over 5 to 20 years.
(G) Represents adjustment to reflect cumulative dividend accrued during the
period presented, assuming issuance on the first day of the period
presented, for the $59,466 of the Company's Series B Preferred issued to
acquire the ICS Operations. The adjustment reflects the Series B Preferred
dividend accrual rate of 8.0%.
(H) Represents the incremental interest giving effect to the Notes Offering and
Senior Credit Facility Retirement.
F-30
160
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Board of Directors of
OpTel, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of ICS
Communications, LLC acquired by OpTel, Inc. ("OpTel") as of December 31, 1997,
and the statement of revenues and direct expenses of such assets and liabilities
for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of
OpTel's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the assets and liabilities of ICS Communications, LLC acquired by
OpTel, Inc. at December 31, 1997 and the related revenues and direct expenses
for the year ended December 31, 1997 in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
May 15, 1998
Dallas, Texas
F-31
161
ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF ICS COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
ACQUIRED BY OPTEL, INC.
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES ACQUIRED
ASSETS
DECEMBER 31, 1997 MARCH 31, 1998
----------------- ---------------
(UNAUDITED)
Accounts receivable (Net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of $737,000 and $333,000)................................. $ 1,181,677 $ 1,332,000
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other assets................. 295,639 290,233
Property and equipment, net (Note 2)........................ 21,824,123 21,084,342
Intangible assets, net (Note 3)............................. 9,241,488 8,166,744
----------- -----------
Total assets...................................... 32,542,927 30,873,319
----------- -----------
LIABILITIES
Deferred revenues and customer deposits..................... 758,109 841,620
Capital lease obligations (Note 4).......................... 825,056 807,047
----------- -----------
Total liabilities................................. 1,583,165 1,648,667
----------- -----------
Net assets acquired............................... $30,959,762 $29,224,652
=========== ===========
See notes to financial statements.
F-32
162
ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF ICS COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
ACQUIRED BY OPTEL, INC.
STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND DIRECT EXPENSES
THREE MONTHS
YEAR ENDED ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 MARCH 31, 1998
----------------- --------------
(UNAUDITED)
REVENUES:
Cable television.......................................... $14,559,625 $4,028,128
Telecommunications........................................ 2,127,310 354,587
----------- ----------
Total revenues.................................... 16,686,935 4,382,715
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Programming, access fees and revenue sharing.............. 8,747,441 1,909,037
Customer support, general and administrative.............. 5,371,634 1,215,493
Depreciation and amortization............................. 8,088,727 1,988,608
----------- ----------
Total operating expenses.......................... 22,207,802 5,113,138
----------- ----------
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS........................................ (5,520,867) (730,423)
INTEREST EXPENSE............................................ (141,504) (35,376)
----------- ----------
EXCESS OF DIRECT EXPENSES OVER REVENUES..................... $(5,662,371) $ (765,799)
=========== ==========
See notes to financial statements.
F-33
163
ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF ICS COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
ACQUIRED BY OPTEL, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998
(UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of ICS
Communications, LLC (the "Company") only as they relate to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed by OpTel, Inc. ("OpTel") on April 9, 1998. The statement
of revenues and direct expenses include only the results of operations for the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed and do not include any amounts
representing corporate overhead of the Company or interest incurred on
liabilities not assumed by OpTel. In preparation of the statement of revenues
and direct expenses, certain regional overhead costs were allocated to the
assets acquired. Such allocations were based upon subscriber counts, cable
passings or other criteria as considered appropriate.
The Company's operations are in a single business segment, the providing of
cable television and local and long distance telephone services to the high
density residential market, including apartment complexes, condominiums and
other multi-family residential properties (collectively "MDUs"). The Company
provides these services generally under exclusive, long-term contracts with
owners and managers of MDUs.
The assets acquired include long-term contracts to provide cable television
and telephone services to MDU properties, the property and equipment comprising
the cable television and telephone delivery systems for each of the contracts,
other prepaid assets specifically identified at the date of the purchase
(generally prepaid rent on delivery equipment) and customer receivables. In
connection with the purchase, certain liabilities were assumed, generally
capital lease obligations related to the property and equipment used in
telephone delivery systems.
The primary markets of the assets acquired are major metropolitan areas in
Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Texas, and
the greater Washington D.C. area.
Interim Financial Information -- The accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information.
Accordingly they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by
generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial information. In
the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
entries) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
Operating results for the three month periods ended March 31, 1998, are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal
year or any other interim period.
Property and Equipment -- Property and equipment, including equipment under
capital leases, is stated at cost, which includes amounts for construction
materials, direct labor and overhead and capitalized interest. Cost of
maintenance and repairs is charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is
calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
various classes of property and equipment as follows:
Installed cable and headend equipment............ 5-10 years
Telephone switches and equipment................. 5-10 years
Intangible Assets -- Intangible assets includes costs associated with
licensing fees, commissions and other direct costs incurred in connection with
the execution of rights-of-entry agreements to provide cable television and
telecommunications service to MDUs. Intangible assets are amortized using the
straight-line method over the lesser of the term of the right-of-entry agreement
or 5 years.
Revenue Recognition -- Cable subscriber fees for basic monthly services and
premium channels are billed in advance and recorded as revenue in the month the
service is provided. Telecommunication service billings include residential
service fees billed in advance plus amounts based on minutes of use billed in
arrears. Telecommunications service revenues are recognized in the month the
service is provided.
F-34
164
ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF ICS COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
ACQUIRED BY OPTEL, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998
(UNAUDITED)
Use of Estimates -- The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Significant estimates included in the accompanying financial statements include
the allowance for doubtful accounts, the recoverability of the carrying value of
property and equipment and intangible assets and the allocation of regional
overhead as it relates to the assets acquired. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
2. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment at December 31, 1997, including assets under capital
lease, consist of the following:
Installed cable and headend equipment.......... $ 30,051,718
Telephone switches and equipment............... 2,020,330
------------
Sub-total............................ 32,072,048
Less accumulated depreciation................ (10,247,925)
------------
Property and equipment, net.......... $ 21,824,123
============
Telephone switches and equipment at December 31, 1997 include $1,238,273 in
net assets under capital lease.
3. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets at December 31, 1997 consist of the following:
Rights-of-entry costs.......................... $ 21,979,856
Less accumulated amortization................ (12,738,368)
------------
Intangible assets, net............... $ 9,241,488
============
4. CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS
During 1995 and 1996 the Company entered into capital leases for telephone
equipment with five year terms. The leases are payable in monthly installments
ranging from $1,267 to $2,121 bearing interest at rates ranging from 10.4% to
13.0%. Scheduled maturities on capital lease obligations are as follows:
Year ending:
1998........................................... $ 379,980
1999........................................... 379,980
2000........................................... 243,440
Thereafter..................................... --
----------
Total payments......................... 1,003,400
Less amounts representing interest............. (178,344)
----------
Capital lease obligation............... $ 825,056
==========
F-35
165
ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF ICS COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
ACQUIRED BY OPTEL, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998
(UNAUDITED)
5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company's largest shareholder is MCI Telecommunications Corporation
("MCI"). In the ordinary course of the Company's local and long distance
telephone services, the Company purchases certain services from MCI under terms
and rates that management believes are no more favorable to the Company than
those arranged with other parties.
F-36
166
- ------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------
NO DEALER, SALES REPRESENTATIVE OR ANY OTHER PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO
GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS OFFER
OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH
INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATION MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED
BY THE COMPANY. NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROSPECTUS NOR ANY SALE HEREUNDER
SHALL, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO
CHANGE IN THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREIN OR IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE COMPANY
SINCE THE DATE AS OF WHICH INFORMATION IS GIVEN IN THIS PROSPECTUS. THIS
PROSPECTUS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER OR SOLICITATION BY ANYONE IN ANY
JURISDICTION IN WHICH SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION IS NOT AUTHORIZED OR IN WHICH
THE PERSON MAKING SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION IS NOT QUALIFIED TO DO SO OR TO ANY
PERSON TO WHOM IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION.
------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
----
Prospectus Summary...................... 1
Risk Factors............................ 11
The Exchange Offer...................... 26
Use of Proceeds......................... 33
Capitalization.......................... 34
Selected Historical Consolidated
Financial and Operating Data.......... 35
Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of
Operations............................ 38
Business................................ 49
Management.............................. 72
Principal Stockholders.................. 79
Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions.......................... 82
Description of Other Indebtedness....... 85
Description of the 1998 Series B
Notes................................. 86
Exchange Offer; Registration Rights..... 111
Book-Entry; Delivery and Form........... 113
Certain Federal Income Tax
Considerations........................ 115
Description of Capital Stock............ 118
Plan of Distribution.................... 123
Legal Matters........................... 123
Experts................................. 124
Available Information................... 124
Glossary................................ A-1
Index to Financial Statements........... F-1
UNTIL [90 DAYS AFTER EFFECTIVE DATE] ALL DEALERS EFFECTING TRANSACTIONS IN
THE REGISTERED SECURITIES, WHETHER OR NOT PARTICIPATING IN THIS DISTRIBUTION,
MAY BE REQUIRED TO DELIVER A PROSPECTUS. THIS IS IN ADDITION TO THE OBLIGATION
OF DEALERS TO DELIVER A PROSPECTUS WHEN ACTING AS UNDERWRITERS AND WITH RESPECT
TO THEIR UNSOLD ALLOTMENTS OR SUBSCRIPTIONS.
- ------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------
$200,000,000
OPTEL, INC.
11 1/2% SENIOR NOTES
DUE 2008, SERIES B
[OPTEL LOGO]
------------
PROSPECTUS
------------
DATED , 1998
- ------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------
167
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS
ITEM 20. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
The Company's Certificate of Incorporation provides that the Company shall,
to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL, indemnify all persons whom it may
indemnify pursuant thereto (i.e., directors and officers) and shall advance
expenses incurred in defending any proceeding for which such right to
indemnification is applicable, provided that, if the DGCL so requires, the
indemnitee provides the Company with an undertaking to repay all amounts
advanced if it is determined by a final judicial decision that such person is
not entitled to indemnification pursuant to this provision. The Company's
Certificate of Incorporation also contains a provision eliminating the personal
liability of the Company's directors for monetary damages for breach of any
fiduciary duty. By virtue of this provision, under the DGCL, a director of the
Company will not be personally liable for monetary damages for breach of his
fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability for (i) any breach of the
director's duty of loyalty to the Company or its stockholders, (ii) acts or
omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing
violation of law, (iii) dividends or stock purchases or redemptions that are
unlawful under the DGCL and (iv) any transaction from which a director derives
an improper personal benefit. However, this provision of the Company's
Certificate of Incorporation pertains only to breaches of duty by directors as
directors and not in any other corporate capacity such as officers, and limits
liability only for breaches of fiduciary duties under the DGCL and not for
violations of other laws, such as the federal securities laws. As a result of
the inclusion of such provision, stockholders may be unable to recover monetary
damages against directors for actions taken by them that constitute negligence
or gross negligence or that are in violation of their fiduciary duties, although
it may be possible to obtain injunctive or other equitable relief with respect
to such actions. The inclusion of this provision in the Company's Certificate of
Incorporation may have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative
litigation against directors, and may discourage or deter stockholders or
management from bringing a lawsuit against directors for breach of their duty of
care, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise have benefitted
the Company and its stockholders.
ITEM 21. EXHIBITS.
(a) Exhibits
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
2.1 -- Purchase Agreement (the "ICS Purchase Agreement") among
OpTel, ICS and ICS Licenses, Inc., dated as of March 4,
1998.(4)
2.2 -- Amendment Number One to the ICS Purchase Agreement, dated
as of March 4, 1998.(4)
2.3 -- Purchase Agreement (the "Phonoscope Purchase Agreement"),
dated as of August 13, 1997, among OpTel, Phonoscope,
Ltd., Phonoscope Management L.C., Lee Cook, Alton Cook
and Lee Cook Family Trust.(2)
2.4 -- Amendment Number One to the Phonoscope Purchase
Agreement, dated as of August 13, 1997.(4)
2.5 -- Amendment Number Two to the Phonoscope Purchase
Agreement, dated as of August 13, 1997.(4)
3.1 -- Restated Certificate of Incorporation of OpTel, together
with all amendments thereto.
3.2 -- Bylaws of OpTel.(1)
3.3 -- Certificate of Designation of Voting Power, Designations,
Preferences, Limitations, Restrictions and Relative
Rights of the Series A Preferred.(4)
II-1
168
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
3.4 -- Certificate of Designation of Voting Power, Designations,
Preferences, Limitations, Restrictions and Relative
Rights of the Series B Preferred.(4)
4.1 -- 1997 Notes Purchase Agreement, dated February 7, 1997,
between OpTel and Salomon Brothers Inc and Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated.(1)
4.2 -- Registration Agreement, dated as of February 14, 1997,
between OpTel and Salomon Brothers Inc and Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated.(1)
4.3 -- Indenture, dated as of February 14, 1997, between OpTel
and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A., as Trustee.(1)
4.4 -- Form of 1997 Note (included in Exhibit 4.3).(1)
4.5 -- Escrow Agreement, dated as of February 14, 1997, between
OpTel and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A., as Trustee
and Escrow Agent.(1)
4.6 -- 1998 Notes Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 29, 1998,
between OpTel, Salomon Brothers Inc, Goldman, Sachs & Co.
and CIBC Oppenheimer.(6)
4.7 -- Registration Agreement, dated as of July 7, 1998, between
OpTel and Salomon Brothers Inc, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and
CIBC Oppenheimer.(6)
4.8 -- Indenture, dated as of July 7, 1998, between OpTel and
U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A., as Trustee.(6)
4.9 -- Form of 1998 Note (included in Exhibit 4.8).(6)
4.10 -- Escrow Agreement, dated as of July 7, 1998, between OpTel
and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A., as Trustee and
Escrow Agent.(6)
5.1 -- Opinion of Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP.
8.1 -- Opinion of Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP re: Tax
matters (included in Exhibit 5.1).
10.1 -- Stockholders' Agreement, dated as of December 22, 1994,
between VPC, Vanguard, Vanguard Communications, Inc.
("General Partner") and OpTel.(1)
10.2 -- Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 22,
1994, between OpTel and Vanguard.(1)
10.3 -- Settlement Agreement, dated as of August 1, 1996, between
Vanguard, General Partner, Pacific Capital Group, Inc.
("Pacific"), VPC, OpTel and GVL.(1)
10.4 -- Amendment, dated as of February 17, 1997, between
Vanguard, General Partner, Pacific, VPC, OpTel and
GVL.(1)
10.5 -- Form of Convertible Note (included as Exhibit B to the
Amendment referenced as Exhibit 10.4 hereto) and a list
of the issue dates and principal amounts of all
outstanding Convertible Notes (included as Schedule 1 to
the Amendment referenced as Exhibit 10.4 hereto).(1)
10.6 -- Stockholders' Agreement, dated as of August 15, 1997, by
and among VPC, CDPQ and OpTel.(3)
10.7 -- Stockholders' Agreement, dated as of April 9, 1998, among
OpTel, Nomura, MCI, GVL and ICS.(4)
10.8 -- Lease Agreement, dated July 25, 1995, between Space
Center Dallas, Inc. and OpTel.(1)
10.9 -- First Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated August 8, 1996,
between Space Center Dallas, Inc. and OpTel. (1)
10.10 -- Restated Incentive Stock Plan of OpTel, dated November
12, 1996.(1)
II-2
169
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
10.11 -- Restated Incentive Stock Plan of OpTel, dated June 4,
1998.
10.12 -- Annual Bonus Plan of OpTel.(1)
10.13 -- Employment Agreement between Stephen Dube and OpTel,
dated November 19, 1996.
10.14 -- Employment Agreement between Bertrand Blanchette and
OpTel, dated June 17, 1996.
10.15 -- Employment Agreement between Lynn Zera and OpTel, dated
November 7, 1995.
10.16 -- Employment Agreement between Louis Brunel and OpTel,
dated November 15, 1996.(1)
10.17 -- Employment Agreement between Rory Cole and OpTel, dated
January 3, 1997.(1)
10.18 -- Employment Agreement between Michael Katzenstein and
OpTel, dated September 18, 1995.(1)
10.18(a) -- Employment Agreement between Michael Katzenstein and
OpTel, dated January 14, 1998.
10.19 -- Separation and Consulting Agreement, dated as of
September 1, 1996, between OpTel and James A. Kofalt.(1)
10.20 -- Warrant Agreement, dated as of September 1, 1996, between
OpTel and James A. Kofalt.(1)
10.21 -- Separation Agreement, dated as of July 11, 1997, between
OpTel and Rory O. Cole.(4)
10.22 -- Warrant Agreement, dated as of July 11, 1997, between
OpTel and Rory O. Cole.(2)
10.23 -- Assignment Agreement, dated as of February 14, 1997,
among TVMAX, Sunshine Television Entertainment, Inc.,
Richey Pacific Cablevision, Inc., IRPC Arizona, Inc. and
THI.(1)
10.24 -- Equipment License and Services Agreement, dated as of
February 14, 1997, between TVMAX and THI.(1)
10.25 -- Form of Shareholders Option Agreement, dated as of
February 14, 1997, between TVMAX and each of the
shareholders of THI, together with a list of the
shareholders of THI.(1)
10.27 -- Common Stock Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of
February 14, 1997, among OpTel, VPC, GVL and Salomon
Brothers Inc and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A.(1)
10.28 -- Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 15,
1997, between OpTel and CDPQ.(2)
10.29 -- Registration Rights Agreement dated as of April 9, 1998,
between OpTel, ICS, Nomura and MCI.(4)
10.30 -- City of Houston, Texas, Ordinance No. 89-338 dated March
29, 1989 granting to PrimeTime Cable Partners I, Ltd. the
right to operate for 15 years a Community Antenna
Television System, and subsequent ordinances consenting
to assignment of rights to EagleVision and to TVMAX
Communications (Texas), Inc.(1)
10.31 -- City of Houston, Texas, Ordinance No. 97-285 dated March
19, 1997, granting TVMAX Communications (Texas), Inc. a
temporary permit to operate a Telecommunications
Network.(1)
II-3
170
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
10.32 -- City of Houston, Texas, Ordinance No. 97-1088 dated
September 3, 1997, extending to TVMAX Communications
(Texas), Inc. a temporary permit to operate a
Telecommunications Network (originally granted pursuant
to the permit referenced in Exhibit 10.31 hereto).(2)
10.33 -- City of Houston, Texas, Ordinance No. 97-1567 dated
December 23, 1997, granting to TVMAX Communications
(Texas), Inc. a franchise to operate a Telecommunications
Network (superseding and replacing the temporary permits
referenced in Exhibits 10.31 and 10.32 hereto).(4)
10.34 -- Amendment Number 001 to the Videotron/Lucent Agreement,
dated August 28, 1997, among Videotron Telecom Ltee and
Lucent Technologies Canada Inc. and TVMAX and Lucent
Technologies Inc.(2)
10.35 -- Credit Agreement dated as of December 19, 1997, ("Credit
Agreement") among TVMAX, OpTel, Goldman Sachs Credit
Partners L.P., as arranger and syndication agent,
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, individually and as
administrative agent, General Electric Capital
Corporation, individually and as documentation agent, and
the lenders party thereto from time to time
(collectively, the "Lenders").(4)
10.36 -- First Amendment to the Credit Agreement dated as of April
29, 1998.(4)
10.37 -- Interconnection Agreement under Sections 251 and 252 of
the Telecom Act by and between Southwestern Bell
Telephone Company and OpTel (Texas) Telecom, Inc.(2)
10.38 -- Residential Reseller Agreement dated as of May 29, 1998
by and between Teleport Communications Group Inc. and
TVMAX.**
10.39 -- Strategic Alliance Agreement dated as of March 10, 1998
between I(3)S, Inc. and TVMAX.**
12.1 -- Statement Re: Computation of Deficiency of Earnings to
Fixed Charges.
21.1 -- List of subsidiaries of OpTel.
23.1 -- Consent of Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP (included in
exhibit 5.1).
23.2 -- Consent of Goldberg, Godles, Wiener & Wright.
23.3 -- Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
24.1 -- Power of Attorney as set forth on the signature page of
this Registration Statement.
25.1 -- Statement of Eligibility and Qualification under the
Trust Indenture Act of 1939 on Form T-1.
99.1 -- Form of Letter of Transmittal.
- ---------------
(1) Filed as an exhibit to OpTel's registration statement on Form S-4 filed with
the Commission on April 10, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.
(2) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's 10-K filed with the Commission for
fiscal year ended August 31, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.
(3) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's 10-K/A filed with the Commission for
fiscal year ended August 31, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.
(4) Filed as an exhibit to OpTel's registration statement on Form S-1 filed with
the Commission on June 5, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference.
(5) Filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 2 to OpTel's registration statement on
Form S-1/A filed with the Commission on July 20, 1998 and incorporated
herein by reference.
II-4
171
(6) Filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 3 to OpTel's registration statement on
Form S-1/A filed with the Commission on August 14, 1998 and incorporated
herein by reference.
** Certain provisions of this exhibit were filed separately with the Commission
pursuant to an application for confidential treatment.
(b) The financial statements and financial statement schedules filed as
part of this Registration Statement are as follows:
1. Financial Statements. See Index to Financial Statements on page F-1
of the Prospectus included in this Registration Statement.
2. Financial Statement Schedule II.
All schedules, other than Schedule II, have been omitted as they are not
required under the related instructions, are inapplicable, or because the
information required is included in the financial statements and related
notes thereto.
ITEM 22. UNDERTAKINGS.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a
post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement:
(i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the
Securities Act.
(ii) To reflect in the Prospectus any facts or events arising after
the effective date of this Registration Statement (or the most recent
post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate,
represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in this
Registration Statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or
decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of
securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any
deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range
may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission
pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and
price represent no more than 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate
offering price set forth in the "Calculation of Registration Fee" table in
the effective Registration Statement.
(iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of
distribution not previously disclosed in this Exchange Registration
Statement or any material change to such information in this Exchange
Registration Statement.
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities
Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such
securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering
thereof.
(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any
of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the
offering.
(4) To respond to requests for information that is incorporated by
reference into the Prospectus pursuant to Item 4, 10(b), 11 or 13 of Form S-4,
within one business day of receipt of such request, and to send the incorporated
documents by first class mail or other equally prompt means. This includes
information contained in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of
this Registration Statement through the date of responding to the request.
(5) To supply by means of a post-effective amendment all information
concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired involved therein, that
was not the subject of and included in this Registration Statement when it
became effective.
II-5
172
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of OpTel
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, OpTel has been advised that
in the opinion of the Commission such indemnification is against public policy
as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the
event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the
payment by OpTel of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or
controlling person of OpTel in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, OpTel will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent,
submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities
Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
II-6
173
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the Company has duly
caused this Exchange Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Dallas, State of Texas,
on this 4th day of September, 1998.
OPTEL, INC.
By: /s/ LOUIS BRUNEL
----------------------------------
Louis Brunel
President and Chief Executive
Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, this Exchange
Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the
capacities and on the dates indicated. Each person whose signature appears below
under the heading "Signature" constitutes and appoints Louis Brunel and Michael
E. Katzenstein or either of them, as true and lawfully attorney-in-fact and
agent with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in
his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to sign any or all
amendments to this Exchange Registration Statement, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority
to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be
done in and about the premises, as fully for all intents and purposes as he
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
Principal Executive Officer:
/s/ LOUIS BRUNEL President and Chief Executive September 4, 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------- Officer
Louis Brunel
Principal Financial and Accounting Officers:
/s/ BERTRAND BLANCHETTE Chief Financial Officer September 4, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
Bertrand Blanchette
/s/ CRAIG MILACEK Controller September 4, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
Craig Milacek
Directors:
/s/ CLAUDE CHAGNON Chairman of the Board September 4, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
Claude Chagnon
/s/ ALAIN MICHEL Vice Chairman of the Board September 4, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
Alain Michel
174
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
Directors:
/s/ LOUIS BRUNEL Director September 4, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
Louis Brunel
/s/ CHRISTIAN CHAGNON Director September 4, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
Christian Chagnon
/s/ WILLIAM O. HUNT Director September 4, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
William O. Hunt
/s/ LYNN MCDONALD Director September 4, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
Lynn McDonald
175
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Board of Directors of
OpTel, Inc.:
We have audited the financial statements of OpTel, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of August 31, 1997 and 1996, and for each of the years ended August 31, 1997 and
1996, the period from January 1, 1995 to August 31, 1995, and the year ended
December 31, 1994; such financial statements and report are included herein. Our
audits also included the financial statement schedule of OpTel, Inc. listed in
Item 16. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the
Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
October 14, 1997
Dallas, Texas
176
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
($ IN THOUSANDS)
DEDUCTIONS,
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO WRITE-OFFS BALANCE AT
BEGINNING OF COSTS AND AND END OF
PERIOD EXPENSES RECOVERIES PERIOD
------------ ---------- ----------- ----------
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
Nine month period ended May 31, 1998........ $1,125 $1,722 $(1,324) $1,523
Year ended August 31, 1997.................. 542 1,788 (1,205) 1,125
Year ended August 31, 1996.................. 473 1,376 (1,307) 542
Period ended August 31, 1995................ 148 372 (47) 473
Year ended December 31, 1994................ 0 148 0 148
177
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
2.1 -- Purchase Agreement (the "ICS Purchase Agreement") among
OpTel, ICS and ICS Licenses, Inc., dated as of March 4,
1998.(4)
2.2 -- Amendment Number One to the ICS Purchase Agreement, dated
as of March 4, 1998.(4)
2.3 -- Purchase Agreement (the "Phonoscope Purchase Agreement"),
dated as of August 13, 1997, among OpTel, Phonoscope,
Ltd., Phonoscope Management L.C., Lee Cook, Alton Cook
and Lee Cook Family Trust.(2)
2.4 -- Amendment Number One to the Phonoscope Purchase
Agreement, dated as of August 13, 1997.(4)
2.5 -- Amendment Number Two to the Phonoscope Purchase
Agreement, dated as of August 13, 1997.(4)
3.1 -- Restated Certificate of Incorporation of OpTel, together
with all amendments thereto.
3.2 -- Bylaws of OpTel.(1)
3.3 -- Certificate of Designation of Voting Power, Designations,
Preferences, Limitations, Restrictions and Relative
Rights of the Series A Preferred.(4)
3.4 -- Certificate of Designation of Voting Power, Designations,
Preferences, Limitations, Restrictions and Relative
Rights of the Series B Preferred.(4)
4.1 -- 1997 Notes Purchase Agreement, dated February 7, 1997,
between OpTel and Salomon Brothers Inc and Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated.(1)
4.2 -- Registration Agreement, dated as of February 14, 1997,
between OpTel and Salomon Brothers Inc and Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated.(1)
4.3 -- Indenture, dated as of February 14, 1997, between OpTel
and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A., as Trustee.(1)
4.4 -- Form of 1997 Note (included in Exhibit 4.3).(1)
4.5 -- Escrow Agreement, dated as of February 14, 1997, between
OpTel and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A., as Trustee
and Escrow Agent.(1)
4.6 -- 1998 Notes Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 29, 1998,
between OpTel, Salomon Brothers Inc, Goldman, Sachs & Co.
and CIBC Oppenheimer.(6)
4.7 -- Registration Agreement, dated as of July 7, 1998, between
OpTel and Salomon Brothers Inc, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and
CIBC Oppenheimer.(6)
4.8 -- Indenture, dated as of July 7, 1998, between OpTel and
U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A., as Trustee.(6)
4.9 -- Form of 1998 Note (included in Exhibit 4.8).(6)
4.10 -- Escrow Agreement, dated as of July 7, 1998, between OpTel
and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A., as Trustee and
Escrow Agent.(6)
5.1 -- Opinion of Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP.
8.1 -- Opinion of Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP re: Tax
matters (included in Exhibit 5.1).
10.1 -- Stockholders' Agreement, dated as of December 22, 1994,
between VPC, Vanguard, Vanguard Communications, Inc.
("General Partner") and OpTel.(1)
10.2 -- Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 22,
1994, between OpTel and Vanguard.(1)
178
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
10.3 -- Settlement Agreement, dated as of August 1, 1996, between
Vanguard, General Partner, Pacific Capital Group, Inc.
("Pacific"), VPC, OpTel and GVL.(1)
10.4 -- Amendment, dated as of February 17, 1997, between
Vanguard, General Partner, Pacific, VPC, OpTel and
GVL.(1)
10.5 -- Form of Convertible Note (included as Exhibit B to the
Amendment referenced as Exhibit 10.4 hereto) and a list
of the issue dates and principal amounts of all
outstanding Convertible Notes (included as Schedule 1 to
the Amendment referenced as Exhibit 10.4 hereto).(1)
10.6 -- Stockholders' Agreement, dated as of August 15, 1997, by
and among VPC, CDPQ and OpTel.(3)
10.7 -- Stockholders' Agreement, dated as of April 9, 1998, among
OpTel, Nomura, MCI, GVL and ICS.(4)
10.8 -- Lease Agreement, dated July 25, 1995, between Space
Center Dallas, Inc. and OpTel.(1)
10.9 -- First Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated August 8, 1996,
between Space Center Dallas, Inc. and OpTel. (1)
10.10 -- Restated Incentive Stock Plan of OpTel, dated November
12, 1996.(1)
10.11 -- Restated Incentive Stock Plan of OpTel, dated June 4,
1998.
10.12 -- Annual Bonus Plan of OpTel.(1)
10.13 -- Employment Agreement between Stephen Dube and OpTel,
dated November 19, 1996.
10.14 -- Employment Agreement between Bertrand Blanchette and
OpTel, dated June 17, 1996.
10.15 -- Employment Agreement between Lynn Zera and OpTel, dated
November 7, 1995.
10.16 -- Employment Agreement between Louis Brunel and OpTel,
dated November 15, 1996.(1)
10.17 -- Employment Agreement between Rory Cole and OpTel, dated
January 3, 1997.(1)
10.18 -- Employment Agreement between Michael Katzenstein and
OpTel, dated September 18, 1995.(1)
10.18(a) -- Employment Agreement between Michael Katzenstein and
OpTel, dated January 14, 1998.
10.19 -- Separation and Consulting Agreement, dated as of
September 1, 1996, between OpTel and James A. Kofalt.(1)
10.20 -- Warrant Agreement, dated as of September 1, 1996, between
OpTel and James A. Kofalt.(1)
10.21 -- Separation Agreement, dated as of July 11, 1997, between
OpTel and Rory O. Cole.(4)
10.22 -- Warrant Agreement, dated as of July 11, 1997, between
OpTel and Rory O. Cole.(2)
10.23 -- Assignment Agreement, dated as of February 14, 1997,
among TVMAX, Sunshine Television Entertainment, Inc.,
Richey Pacific Cablevision, Inc., IRPC Arizona, Inc. and
THI.(1)
10.24 -- Equipment License and Services Agreement, dated as of
February 14, 1997, between TVMAX and THI.(1)
10.25 -- Form of Shareholders Option Agreement, dated as of
February 14, 1997, between TVMAX and each of the
shareholders of THI, together with a list of the
shareholders of THI.(1)
179
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
10.26 -- Option Agreement, dated as of February 14, 1997, between
TVMAX and THI.(1)
10.27 -- Common Stock Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of
February 14, 1997, among OpTel, VPC, GVL and Salomon
Brothers Inc and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A.(1)
10.28 -- Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 15,
1997, between OpTel and CDPQ.(2)
10.29 -- Registration Rights Agreement dated as of April 9, 1998,
between OpTel, ICS, Nomura and MCI.(4)
10.30 -- City of Houston, Texas, Ordinance No. 89-338 dated March
29, 1989 granting to PrimeTime Cable Partners I, Ltd. the
right to operate for 15 years a Community Antenna
Television System, and subsequent ordinances consenting
to assignment of rights to EagleVision and to TVMAX
Communications (Texas), Inc.(1)
10.31 -- City of Houston, Texas, Ordinance No. 97-285 dated March
19, 1997, granting TVMAX Communications (Texas), Inc. a
temporary permit to operate a Telecommunications
Network.(1)
10.32 -- City of Houston, Texas, Ordinance No. 97-1088 dated
September 3, 1997, extending to TVMAX Communications
(Texas), Inc. a temporary permit to operate a
Telecommunications Network (originally granted pursuant
to the permit referenced in Exhibit 10.31 hereto).(2)
10.33 -- City of Houston, Texas, Ordinance No. 97-1567 dated
December 23, 1997, granting to TVMAX Communications
(Texas), Inc. a franchise to operate a Telecommunications
Network (superseding and replacing the temporary permits
referenced in Exhibits 10.31 and 10.32 hereto).(4)
10.34 -- Amendment Number 001 to the Videotron/Lucent Agreement,
dated August 28, 1997, among Videotron Telecom Ltee and
Lucent Technologies Canada Inc. and TVMAX and Lucent
Technologies Inc.(2)
10.35 -- Credit Agreement dated as of December 19, 1997, ("Credit
Agreement") among TVMAX, OpTel, Goldman Sachs Credit
Partners L.P., as arranger and syndication agent,
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, individually and as
administrative agent, General Electric Capital
Corporation, individually and as documentation agent, and
the lenders party thereto from time to time
(collectively, the "Lenders").(4)
10.36 -- First Amendment to the Credit Agreement dated as of April
29, 1998.(4)
10.37 -- Interconnection Agreement under Sections 251 and 252 of
the Telecom Act by and between Southwestern Bell
Telephone Company and OpTel (Texas) Telecom, Inc.(2)
10.38 -- Residential Reseller Agreement dated as of May 29, 1998
by and between Teleport Communications Group Inc. and
TVMAX.**
10.39 -- Strategic Alliance Agreement dated as of March 10, 1998
between I(3)S, Inc. and TVMAX.**
12.1 -- Statement Re: Deficiency of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
21.1 -- List of subsidiaries of OpTel.
23.1 -- Consent of Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman LLP (included in
exhibit 5.1).
23.2 -- Consent of Goldberg, Godles, Wiener & Wright.
23.3 -- Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
24.1 -- Power of Attorney as set forth on the signature page of
this Registration Statement.
25.1 -- Statement of Eligibility and Qualification under the
Trust Indenture Act of 1939 on Form T-1.
180
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
99.1 -- Form of Letter of Transmittal.
- ---------------
(1) Filed as an exhibit to OpTel's registration statement on Form S-4 filed with
the Commission on April 10, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.
(2) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's 10-K filed with the Commission for
fiscal year ended August 31, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.
(3) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's 10-K/A filed with the Commission for
fiscal year ended August 31, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.
(4) Filed as an exhibit to OpTel's registration statement on Form S-1 filed with
the Commission on June 5, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference.
(5) Filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 2 to OpTel's registration statement on
Form S-1/A filed with the Commission on July 20, 1998 and incorporated
herein by reference.
(6) Filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 3 to OpTel's registration statement on
Form S-1/A filed with the Commission on August 14, 1998 and incorporated
herein by reference.
** Certain provisions of this exhibit were filed separately with the Commission
pursuant to an application for confidential treatment.