SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )

FILED BY THE REGISTRANT [X] FILED BY A PARTY OTHER THAN THE REGISTRANT [ ]

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to sec.240.14a-11(c) or sec.240.14a-12
[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))

Nashua Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

Nashua Corporation
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)

PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX):
[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant
to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):

4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

5) Total fee paid:

[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

1) Amount Previously Paid:

2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

3) Filing Party:

4) Date Filed:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2

NASHUA CORPORATION

11 TRAFALGAR SQUARE
NASHUA, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03063

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY 8, 2001

To the Stockholders of Nashua Corporation:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Nashua
Corporation (the "Company") will be held at the Crowne Plaza, 2 Somerset
Parkway, Nashua, New Hampshire, on Tuesday, May 8, 2001 at 10:00 a.m., local
time, for the following purposes:

1. To elect eight directors for terms of one year each.

2. To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors
for the year 2001.

3. To act upon any other business as may properly be brought before the
meeting or any adjournment thereof.

The Board of Directors has no knowledge of any other business to be
transacted at the meeting.

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 27, 2001,
as the record date for determining the stockholders having the right to notice
of and to vote at the meeting. The list of stockholders entitled to vote at the
meeting will be open to the examination of any stockholder, for any purpose
relevant to the meeting, for a period of ten days prior to the meeting during
regular business hours at the offices of the Company at 11 Trafalgar Square,
Nashua, New Hampshire.

The Company's Summary Annual Report and Form 10-K, which includes financial
statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, accompany
this notice of meeting and the enclosed proxy statement.

By order of the Board of Directors,

ROBERT S. AMREIN
Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary

Nashua, New Hampshire
March 28, 2001

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE PROMPTLY
COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD.
3

PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE
----

VOTING SECURITIES........................................... 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Nominees for Election as Directors........................ 1
Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors......... 3
Certain Business Relationships of Directors............... 4
Compensation of Directors................................. 4
Report of the Governance Committee........................ 4

STOCK OWNERSHIP
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners........... 6
Security Ownership of Management.......................... 7
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance... 9

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table................................ 9
Stock Options............................................. 11
Pension Plan.............................................. 12
Severance Agreements...................................... 12
Leadership and Compensation Committee Report on Executive
Compensation........................................... 13

STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH..................................... 15

REPORT OF THE AUDIT/FINANCE AND INVESTMENT COMMITTEE........ 16

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS........................................ 17

RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS........... 18

SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS - 2002 ANNUAL MEETING... 18

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES..................................... 18

OTHER MATTERS............................................... 18

APPENDIX A -- AUDIT/FINANCE AND INVESTMENT COMMITTEE
CHARTER................................................... A-1

i
4

NASHUA CORPORATION

PROXY STATEMENT

This Proxy Statement is furnished to the stockholders of Nashua Corporation
("Nashua" or the "Company") in connection with the solicitation of proxies on
behalf of the Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held on May 8, 2001, and at any adjournments of that meeting. This proxy
statement and the enclosed proxy are being mailed to stockholders on or about
April 6, 2001.

A stockholder may revoke the enclosed proxy at any time before it is voted
by executing a subsequent proxy, by filing written notice of revocation with the
Secretary of the Company, or by voting in person at the meeting.

VOTING SECURITIES

Nashua's only outstanding class of voting securities is its common stock,
each share of which is entitled to one vote. Only stockholders of record at the
close of business on March 27, 2001 are entitled to vote at the annual meeting
and at any adjournments of the meeting. As of the close of business on March 27,
2001, there were 5,833,783 shares of Nashua's common stock outstanding,
excluding 1,023,818 shares held in Nashua's treasury. The presence at the annual
meeting, in person or by proxy, of a majority of the shares of common stock
issued and outstanding on March 27, 2001 will constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business at the meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are
treated in the same manner as shares present or represented at the annual
meeting for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum.

Under Nashua's bylaws, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the shares of Nashua's common stock entitled to vote held by stockholders
present at the annual meeting in person or by proxy is required to approve all
matters to be acted upon at the annual meeting. The proxy holders will vote all
proxies in accordance with the instructions contained in the proxy card and, if
no choice is specified, the proxy holders will vote in favor of the proposal to
elect directors, will vote in favor of the ratification of the engagement of
Ernst & Young LLP as Nashua's independent auditors, and will use their
discretion with respect to any other business properly brought before the annual
meeting. The total number of votes cast "for" a proposal will determine whether
a proposal is adopted.

Abstentions are counted in determining the number of votes cast and while
not counted as votes "for" or "against" a proposal, abstentions have the same
effect as votes against a proposal. Broker non-votes are not counted for any
purpose in determining whether a proposal has been approved. A broker non-vote
occurs when a registered broker holding a customer's shares in the name of the
broker has not received voting instructions on a matter from the customer and is
barred by stock exchange rules from exercising discretionary authority to vote
on the matter. Under rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers who hold
shares in street name for customers are prohibited from giving a proxy to vote
such shares without specific instructions from such customers for
"non-discretionary" or "non-routine" proposals.

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS

Pursuant to the bylaws of Nashua, the Board of Directors has fixed at eight
the number of directors to be elected at the annual meeting. Nashua's directors
are elected annually by the stockholders and hold office until successors are
elected and qualified or until death, resignation or removal. Vacancies and
newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number
of directors may be filled until the next annual meeting of stockholders by the
majority of directors then in office.

The Nashua Board of Directors proposes the election of the following
directors of the Company. Each proxy executed and returned by a stockholder will
be voted for the election of the nominees for directors listed below, unless
authority to do so is withheld. If, however, any nominee becomes unavailable
(which is not now anticipated), the persons named as proxies may, in their
discretion, vote for another nominee. All of the

1
5

nominees for directors are currently directors of Nashua, except Mr. Schwarz.
Background information about the Board's nominees for election is set forth
below.

DIRECTOR
NAME AGE SINCE BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
---- --- -------- -------------------

Andrew B. Albert..................... 55 2000 Mr. Albert has served as Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Nashua since December 2000,
President since April 2000 and a director since
May 2000. He also served as Chief Operating
Officer from April 2000 to December 2000. Mr.
Albert was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Rittenhouse Paper Company from 1983 to April 2000.
Sheldon A. Buckler................... 69 1994 Dr. Buckler has served as Chairman of the Board of
Lord Corporation, a technology based manufacturing
company, since January 1, 2000 and as Chairman of
the Board of the Massachusetts Eye and Ear
Infirmary, a Harvard Medical School teaching
hospital, since December 1996. Dr. Buckler served
as Chairman of the Board of Commonwealth Energy
System, a supplier of energy products, from May
1995 through 1999. Dr. Buckler is a director of
MCT Corp., Parlex Corporation and NSTAR
Corporation.
Avrum Gray........................... 65 2000 Mr. Gray has served as Chairman of G-Bar Limited
Partnership, an options trading firm, since 1981
and as Chairman of Lynch Systems, Inc., a glass
press supplier, since 1995. Mr. Gray is a director
of Lynch Corporation.
John M. Kucharski.................... 65 1988 Mr. Kucharski has served as Vice Chairman of
Nashua since December 2000. He served as Chairman
of the Board of EG&G, Inc., a provider of
technical and scientific products and services,
from 1988 until his retirement in February 1999,
as its Chief Executive Officer from 1987 through
1998 and as its President from 1986 until February
1998. Mr. Kucharski is a director of State Street
Boston Corporation.
George R. Mrkonic, Jr................ 48 2000 Mr. Mrkonic has served as Vice Chairman of Borders
Group, Inc., a retailer of books and music, since
December 1994, President from 1994 until January
1997 and a director since August 1994. Prior to
joining Borders, Mr. Mrkonic served as Executive
Vice President of Kmart Corporation. Mr. Mrkonic
is a director of Champion Enterprises, Inc., Cheap
Tickets, Inc. and Syntel, Inc.
Peter J. Murphy...................... 52 1997 Mr. Murphy has served as Chief Executive Officer
of Parlex Corporation, a manufacturer of
electrical components, since July 1997, President
since July 1995 and a director since March 1994.
Prior to his employment with Parlex Corporation,
Mr. Murphy served as President of Teledyne
Electro-Mechanisms, a manufacturer of flexible
circuits.

2
6

DIRECTOR
NAME AGE SINCE BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
---- --- -------- -------------------

James F. Orr III..................... 58 1989 Mr. Orr has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of United Asset Management
Corp., an investment management firm, since May
2000. Mr. Orr served as Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and President of UNUM Corporation, an
insurance company, from 1988 until his retirement
in November 1999. Mr. Orr is a director of Maine
Bank Corp. and MDT Advisors.
Mark E. Schwarz...................... 40 -- Mr. Schwarz has been the sole general partner of
Newcastle Partners, L.P., a private investment
firm, since January 1993. He has also been
President and sole Managing Member of Newcastle
Capital Group, L.L.C. since 2000. Mr. Schwarz was
Vice President of Sandera Capital Management,
L.L.C. from December 1995 to June 1999 and a
Manager from May 1995 to September 1999. He was a
securities analyst and portfolio manager for SCM
Advisors, L.L.C. from May 1993 to 1996. Mr.
Schwarz is a director of Bell Industries, Inc.,
Tandycrafts, Inc. and Hallmark Financial Services,
Inc.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES
FOR DIRECTOR NAMED ABOVE.

MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors is responsible for supervision of the overall
affairs of the Company. To assist it in carrying out its duties, the Board has
delegated certain authority to several committees. The Board of Directors held
six regular meetings and eight special meetings during 2000. Each director
attended more than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and
committees on which he served in 2000.

Dr. Buckler is the Lead Director of the Company. As Lead Director, Dr.
Buckler acts as Chairman of the Board in Mr. Albert's absence, chairs the
Governance Committee and leads all activities related to Chief Executive Officer
performance and succession.

The standing committees of the Board of Directors are the Audit/Finance and
Investment Committee, the Leadership and Compensation Committee and the
Governance Committee. The current members of the committees of the Board of
Directors are as follows:

AUDIT/FINANCE AND LEADERSHIP AND
INVESTMENT COMMITTEE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
-------------------- ---------------------- --------------------

Charles S. Hoppin, Chairman James F. Orr III, Chairman Sheldon A. Buckler, Chairman
Sheldon A. Buckler Avrum Gray Avrum Gray
George R. Mrkonic, Jr. John M. Kucharski Charles S. Hoppin
Peter J. Murphy David C. Miller, Jr. David C. Miller, Jr.
Peter J. Murphy George R. Mrkonic, Jr.
James F. Orr III

The Audit/Finance and Investment Committee is responsible for overseeing
the Company's financial reporting process. In doing so, the committee reviews
the independent public auditors' reports and audit findings, the scope and plans
for future audit programs, annual financial statements, accounting, financial
and internal controls of the Company, information systems, risk management
activities and compliance programs. The Audit/Finance and Investment Committee
recommends the choice of independent public auditors to the full Board of
Directors and reviews their procedures for ensuring their independence with
respect to the

3
7

services performed for the Company. The committee is also responsible for
supervising policies and decisions relating to financing and major cash
management, pension fund and capital investment decisions. The Board of
Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit/Finance and Investment
Committee, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A.

The Audit/Finance and Investment Committee is composed of outside directors
who are not officers or employees of the Company. The Board of Directors has
determined that the members of the Audit/Finance and Investment Committee are
independent directors, as defined by the Audit/Finance and Investment Committee
charter and the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. The Audit/Finance and
Investment Committee held five meetings in 2000.

The Leadership and Compensation Committee is responsible for screening
candidates for the chief executive officer position, developing performance
evaluation criteria, reviewing the caliber of and succession to key management
positions and deciding on senior management compensation. The Leadership and
Compensation Committee held two meetings in 2000.

The Governance Committee is responsible for recommending to the entire
Board the size and composition of the Board, recommending policies regarding
tenure and retirement of Directors, evaluating Board and Director performance
and making recommendations for improvement, nominating candidates for election
to the Board, making assignments to Board committees, and making recommendations
for improving governance processes of the Board. The Governance Committee held
three meetings in 2000. Stockholders wishing to recommend director candidates
for consideration by the committee may do so by writing to the Secretary of the
Company, giving the recommended candidate's name, biographical data and
qualifications.

CERTAIN BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS OF DIRECTORS

Following Nashua's April 2000 acquisition of Rittenhouse Paper Company, Mr.
Albert, formerly chairman and chief executive officer of Rittenhouse, was
elected as a director and officer of Nashua. During 2000, Nashua paid
approximately $267,915 to separate partnerships and a corporation owned or
controlled by the former owners of Rittenhouse, including Mr. Albert, under
certain leases for facilities and equipment.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

Non-employee members of the Board of Directors receive an annual retainer
payable in shares of Nashua's common stock with a market value of $15,000 on the
date of grant, effective as of the first day following their election to the
Board. They also receive $1,000 in cash plus expenses for each Board meeting or
Board committee meeting attended and each year are awarded stock options to
purchase 5,000 shares of common stock having an exercise price equal to the fair
market value of such shares on the date of award under the provisions of
Nashua's stock award plans. The Lead Director, currently Dr. Buckler, receives
an additional $7,500 annually in cash, the Chairman of the Audit/Finance and
Investment Committee receives an additional $2,500 annually in cash and the
Chairman of the Leadership and Compensation Committee receives an additional
$1,500 annually in cash. In December 2000, Mr. Kucharski was elected Vice
Chairman of the Board and given the responsibility to oversee the assessment of
the Company's strategy with respect to its Toner division. For those services,
the Company granted Mr. Kucharski an option to purchase 5,000 shares of common
stock and agreed to compensate Mr. Kucharski an additional $50,000 in cash,
payable in 2001.

REPORT OF THE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

The Governance Committee is composed of non-employee directors and is
charged with responsibility for recommending to the Board the size and
composition of the Board, policies regarding tenure and retirement of Directors,
evaluation of Board and Director performance and recommendations for improvement
and, on an annual basis, nomination of candidates for election to the Board,
assignments to Board committees and recommendations for improving government
processes of the Board. The Lead Director serves as Chairman of the Committee.

4
8

The Committee performs the following duties:

- Recommends to the entire Board any changes in the size of the Board or
particular skills and experience that should be added in order to
strengthen the Board's ability to deal with key issues facing the
Company.

- Defines the skills and experience that are needed on the Board.

- Identifies potential candidates and screens them to recommend a slate of
directors in advance of annual Board elections. Recommends candidates to
fill open positions that are created either through resignations of
existing directors or expansion of the Board.

- Establishes policies regarding compensation, tenure and retirement of
directors.

- Reviews any material changes in a director's job responsibility to
determine whether they warrant resignation or retention on the Board.

- Establishes Board performance expectations and expectations for
individual director performance and contributions.

- Evaluates performance of the Board and individual directors on an annual
basis, drawing on outside professional resources as required, and
provides constructive feedback to the Board overall and to individual
directors that will help them in improving their contributions to the
Company.

- Identifies needed improvements in Board processes and protocols, drawing
upon inputs from all directors.

- Identifies and screens candidates for Board positions and recommends to
the full Board the candidates for nomination and election.

In its 2000 annual evaluation of Board effectiveness and individual
director performance, the Committee recommended to the Board that two new
Directors be added, and that two incumbent Directors not stand for reelection at
the 2001 Annual Meeting. With the concurrence of the Board, the Committee then
identified and screened potential candidates and recommended to the Board the
addition of George R. Mrkonic and Avrum Gray. Mr. Mrkonic and Mr. Gray were
elected to the Board in October 2000. In February 2001, in the course of its
annual screening of candidates for election to the Board at the 2001 Annual
Meeting, the Committee met with Mark E. Schwarz, who had been a candidate for
election to the Board at the 2000 Annual Meeting, and concluded that Mr. Schwarz
would be a valuable addition to the Board. Accordingly, the Committee
recommended to the Board, and the Board nominated for election at the 2001
Annual Meeting, Andrew B. Albert, Sheldon A. Buckler, Avrum Gray, John M.
Kucharski, George R. Mrkonic, Jr., Peter J. Murphy, James F. Orr III and Mark E.
Schwarz. Upon election of these nominees, four of the eight directors will have
served for a number of years, and four will have joined the Board since the 2000
Annual Meeting. The Committee believes that this Board composition optimally
combines the benefits of the longer term directors' extensive knowledge of the
Company and its business with the valuable perspectives of the newer members.

Governance Committee
Sheldon A. Buckler, Chairman
Avrum Gray
Charles S. Hoppin
David C. Miller, Jr.
George R. Mrkonic, Jr.
James F. Orr III

5
9

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following table shows the number of shares and percentage of Nashua's
common stock beneficially owned by all persons known to Nashua to be the
beneficial owners of more than 5% of its common stock, as of March 16, 2001:

AMOUNT AND PERCENT OF
NATURE OF BENEFICIAL COMMON STOCK
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNERSHIP(1) OUTSTANDING
------------------------ -------------------- ------------

Gabelli Funds, LLC/GAMCO Investors, Inc./Gabelli
International II Limited/Gabelli Advisers, Inc./ Gabelli
Group Capital Partners, Inc./Gabelli Asset Management
Inc./Marc J. Gabelli/Mario J. Gabelli..................... 975,149(2) 16.7%
One Corporate Center, Rye, NY 10580
Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc............................... 487,900(3) 8.4%
1299 Ocean Avenue, Santa Monica, CA 90401
The TCW Group, Inc./Robert Day.............................. 453,500(4) 7.8%
865 South Figueroa Street, Los Angeles, CA 90017
FleetBoston Financial Corporation........................... 453,303(5) 7.8%
100 Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110
Franklin Resources, Inc./Charles B. Johnson/Rupert H.
Johnson, Jr./ Franklin Advisory Services, LLC............. 399,200(6) 6.8%
777 Mariners Island Boulevard, San Mateo, CA 94404

- ---------------
(1) The number of shares beneficially owned is determined under rules
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the information
is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose.
Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which an
individual or group has sole or shared voting power or investment power and
also any shares which an individual or group has the right to acquire within
60 days of March 16, 2001 through the conversion of any convertible note or
the exercise of any stock option, warrant or other right. The inclusion
herein of such shares, however, does not constitute an admission that the
named stockholder is a direct or indirect beneficial owner of such shares.
Unless otherwise indicated, each person or group named in the table has sole
voting or investment power (or shares power with his or her spouse) with
respect to all shares of capital stock listed as owned by such person or
entity.

(2) Information is based on a joint Schedule 13D (Amendment No. 24) dated
February 13, 2001, furnished by such beneficial owners which are affiliated
with one another. Gabelli Funds, LLC owns 270,500 shares for which it has
sole voting power and sole dispositive power. GAMCO Investors, Inc. owns
684,649 shares, for which it has sole voting power as to 681,149 shares and
sole dispositive power. Gabelli International II Limited owns 15,000 shares
for which it has sole voting power and sole dispositive power. Gabelli
Advisers, Inc. owns 5,000 shares for which it has sole voting power and sole
dispositive power.

(3) Information is based on Schedule 13G dated February 2, 2001, furnished by
such beneficial owner. Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. has sole voting and
sole dispositive power with respect to such shares. Dimensional, an
investment advisor registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisors
Act of 1940, furnishes investment advice to four investment companies
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and serves as
investment manager to certain other commingled group trusts and separate
accounts. These investment companies, trusts and accounts are the "Funds".
In its role as investment advisor or manager, Dimensional possesses voting
and/or investment power over the securities of Nashua that are owned by the
Funds. All securities reported are owned by the Funds. Dimensional disclaims
beneficial ownership of such securities.

(4) Information is based on Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 5), dated February 12,
2001, furnished by such beneficial owners. The TCW Group, Inc. and Robert
Day have shared voting and shared dispositive power with respect to such
shares.

(5) Information is based on Schedule 13G dated February 14, 2001, furnished by
such beneficial owner. FleetBoston Financial Corporation has sole voting
power as to 266,603 shares and sole dispositive power as to 453,303 shares.

(6) Information is based on Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 3) dated January 26,
2001, furnished by such beneficial owners. Franklin Advisory Services, LLC
has sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to such shares.

6
10

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT

The following table shows the number of shares and percentage of Nashua's
common stock beneficially owned by Nashua's current directors and nominees, the
executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 9, and all
directors and executive officers as a group, as of March 16, 2001:

AMOUNT AND NATURE OF PERCENT OF COMMON
NAME BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP(1) STOCK OUTSTANDING
- ---- ----------------------- -----------------

Albert, Andrew B. ........................... 175,214(2)(13) 3.0%
Buckler, Sheldon A. ......................... 23,328(3)(4) *
DiGiovine, Donna J. ......................... 18,250(5) *
Garbacz, Gerald G. .......................... 179,181(6)(13) 3.1%
Gray, Avrum.................................. 43,867(3)(7) *
Hoppin, Charles S. .......................... 20,328(3) *
Ireland, John J. ............................ 98,595(8)(13) 1.7%
Kucharski, John M. .......................... 25,828(3) *
Matson, Joseph R. ........................... 37,561(9)(13) *
Miller, Jr., David C. ....................... 18,328(3)(10) *
Mrkonic, Jr., George R. ..................... 16,200(3) *
Murphy, Peter J. ............................ 13,391(3) *
Orr III, James F. ........................... 30,328(3) *
Patenaude, John L. .......................... 54,100(11)(13) *
Schwarz, Mark E. ............................ 247,200(12) 4.2%
Directors and Executive Officers as a group
(15 persons)............................... 577,318(13)(14)(15) 9.9%

- ---------------
* Less than 1% of outstanding shares of common stock.

(1) Information as to the interests of the respective nominees has been
furnished in part by them. The number of shares beneficially owned is
determined under rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial
ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership
includes any shares as to which an individual or group has sole or shared
voting power or investment power and also any shares which an individual or
group has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 16, 2001 through the
conversion of any convertible note or the exercise of any stock option,
warrant or other right. The inclusion herein of such shares, however, does
not constitute an admission that the named stockholder is a direct or
indirect beneficial owner of such shares. Unless otherwise indicated, each
person or group named in the table has sole voting or investment power (or
shares power with his or her spouse) with respect to all shares of capital
stock listed as owned by such person or entity.

(2) Includes 100,000 shares of restricted stock, 33,333 shares of which will
vest on April 17, 2001, 33,333 shares of which will vest on April 17, 2002
and 33,334 shares of which will vest on April 17, 2003. Dividends, if any,
will be paid on the shares of restricted stock whether or not they are
still subject to restrictions. The vesting schedule for the restricted
stock is subject to acceleration upon death, disability or a change of
control. However, upon the termination of Mr. Albert's employment with the
Company, any unvested shares will forfeit to the Company.

(3) Includes shares each non-employee director has a right to acquire through
stock options which are exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2001 -- Mr.
Buckler, 10,000 shares; Mr. Gray, 5,000 shares; Mr. Hoppin, 12,000 shares;
Mr. Kucharski, 17,000 shares; Mr. Miller, 9,000 shares; Mr. Mrkonic, 5,000
shares; Mr. Murphy, 8,000 shares; and Mr. Orr, 12,000 shares.

(4) Includes 2,000 shares held by Mr. Buckler's spouse.

(5) Includes 16,750 shares Ms. DiGiovine has a right to acquire through stock
options which are exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2001.

7
11

(6) Includes 120,000 shares Mr. Garbacz has a right to acquire through stock
options which are exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2001.

(7) Includes 14,000 shares held by GF Limited Partnership in which Mr. Gray is
a general partner and 10,667 shares held by AVG Limited Partnership in
which Mr. Gray is a general partner. Mr. Gray disclaims beneficial
ownership of these shares. Also includes 11,000 shares held by JYG Limited
Partnership in which Mr. Gray's spouse is a general partner. Mr. Gray
disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.

(8) Includes 46,000 shares Mr. Ireland has a right to acquire through stock
options which are exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2001. Also
includes 50,000 shares of restricted stock, 25,000 shares of which will
vest if certain performance targets are met for fiscal 2001 and 25,000
shares of which will vest one year thereafter if Mr. Ireland is still an
employee of the Company at that time. Dividends, if any, will accumulate on
the shares of restricted stock and be paid when and if the underlying
shares vest. The vesting schedule for the restricted stock is subject to
acceleration upon death, disability or a change of control. However, upon
the termination of Mr. Ireland's employment with the Company, any unvested
shares will forfeit to the Company.

(9) Includes 26,700 shares Mr. Matson has a right to acquire through stock
options which are exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2001. Also
includes 10,000 shares of restricted stock, 5,000 shares of which will vest
when the average closing price of Nashua stock over a ten trading day
period reaches $20.00; and 5,000 shares of which will vest when the average
closing price of Nashua stock over a ten trading day period reaches $25.00.
The vesting schedule for the restricted stock is subject to acceleration
upon death or disability. Any shares of restricted stock that have not
vested upon the earlier of (i) October 24, 2002 or (ii) termination of
employment, will be forfeited. Dividends, if any, will accumulate on the
shares of restricted stock and be paid when and if the underlying shares
vest.

(10) Includes 1,395 shares held by Mr. Miller's spouse.

(11) Includes 27,000 shares Mr. Patenaude has a right to acquire through stock
options which are exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2001. Also
includes 10,000 shares of restricted stock, 5,000 shares of which will vest
when the average closing price of Nashua stock over a ten trading day
period reaches $19.00; and 5,000 shares of which will vest when the average
closing price of Nashua stock over a ten trading day period reaches $21.00.
The vesting schedule for the restricted stock is subject to acceleration
upon death or disability, and any shares of restricted stock that have not
vested upon the earlier of (i) May 12, 2003 or (ii) termination of
employment, will be forfeited. Also includes 10,000 shares of restricted
stock, 5,000 shares of which will vest when the average closing price of
Nashua stock over a ten trading day period reaches $21.00; and 5,000 shares
of which will vest when the average closing price of Nashua stock over a
ten trading day period reaches $23.00. The vesting schedule for the latter
described shares of restricted stock is subject to acceleration upon death
or disability, and any shares of restricted stock that have not vested upon
the earlier of (i) December 15, 2003 or (ii) termination of employment,
will be forfeited. Dividends, if any, will accumulate on all shares of
restricted stock and be paid when and if the underlying shares vest.

(12) Shares held by Newcastle Partners, L.P. in which Mr. Schwarz is the sole
general partner.

(13) Includes shares held in trust under the Company's Employees' Savings Plan
under which each participating employee has voting power as to the shares
in his account. As of March 16, 2001, 9,181 shares are held in trust for
Mr. Garbacz's account; 214 shares are held in trust for Mr. Albert's
account; 2,595 shares are held in trust for Mr. Ireland's account; 6,100
shares are held in trust for Mr. Patenaude's account; 861 shares are held
in trust for Mr. Matson's account; and 9,770 shares are held in trust for
the accounts of all directors and executive officers as a group. No
director other than Mr. Albert participates in the Plan.

(14) Includes 194,450 shares which the directors and executive officers of
Nashua have the right to acquire through stock options which are
exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2001.

(15) Includes 180,000 shares of restricted stock.

8
12

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's
directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders to file initial reports of
ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the New York Stock Exchange. The Company assists its directors
and executive officers in complying with these filing requirements. Directors,
executive officers and 10% stockholders are required by Securities and Exchange
Commission regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a)
forms they file. Based on a review of the copies of reports furnished to the
Company and written representations from the Company's directors and executive
officers, the Company believes that during 2000 its directors, executive
officers and 10% stockholders have complied with all Section 16(a) filing
requirements.

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth information concerning the annual and
long-term compensation for services to the Company for the 1998, 1999 and 2000
fiscal years, of the Company's Chief Executive Officer, the Company's former
Chief Executive Officer and the other four most highly compensated executive
officers of the Company for 2000, all of whom except for Mr. Garbacz were
serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2000:

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

LONG-TERM
COMPENSATION AWARDS
ANNUAL --------------------------------
COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE SECURITIES
-------------------- BASED RESTRICTED UNDERLYING ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY($) BONUS($) STOCK AWARDS($)(1) OPTIONS(#) COMPENSATION($)(2)
- --------------------------- ---- --------- -------- ------------------ ---------- ------------------

Gerald G. Garbacz(3).............. 2000 350,000 35,000 -- -- 9,594
Former Chairman 1999 350,000 -- 69,750(4) 60,000 10,956
and Chief Executive Officer 1998 384,596 -- 400,000(4) -- 20,342
Andrew B. Albert(5)............... 2000 250,000 -- 850,000(6) 50,000 1,279
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer
John J. Ireland................... 2000 250,000 110,000 425,000(7) -- 8,156
Vice President 1999 230,307 75,738 -- 25,000 4,941
Specialty Paper Products 1998 199,154 144,520 223,750(8) -- 5,290
Division
John L. Patenaude................. 2000 185,000 20,720 -- -- 5,203
Vice President -- Finance, Chief 1999 165,000 20,328 -- 25,000 4,685
Financial Officer and 1998 156,058 38,426(9) 326,250(10)(11) -- 4,393
Treasurer
Joseph R. Matson.................. 2000 155,000 11,160 -- -- 5,435
Vice President, 1999 150,000 9,600 -- 10,000 5,648
Corporate Controller 1998 151,038 7,250 -- 5,000 6,211
Donna J. DiGiovine(12)............ 2000 140,000 22,638(9) -- -- 4,422
Vice President 1999 113,327 21,035 -- 22,500 3,785
Toner Products Division

- ---------------

(1) Market value of restricted shares on the date of grant. As of December 29,
2000, the market value (based on the closing price of $4.44 on the New York
Stock Exchange of Nashua's common stock on such date) and number of
restricted shares were: Mr. Garbacz -- $683,760 (154,000 shares); Mr.
Albert -- $444,000 (100,000 shares); Mr. Ireland -- $222,000 (50,000
shares); Mr. Patenaude -- $88,800 (20,000 shares); and Mr.
Matson -- $44,400 (10,000 shares).

(2) The amounts listed consist of Company contributions to the Employees'
Savings Plan, life insurance income and cash payments in lieu of medical
benefits. In 2000, these amounts were:

(a) as to the Employees' Savings Plan -- Mr. Garbacz, $5,250; Mr. Albert,
$1,279; Mr. Ireland, $7,346; Mr. Patenaude, $4,320; Mr. Matson, $4,715;
and Ms. DiGiovine, $4,173.

9
13

(b) as to life insurance income -- Mr. Garbacz, $3,564; Mr. Ireland, $810;
Mr. Patenaude, $883; Mr. Matson, $720; and Ms. DiGiovine, $249.

(3) Mr. Garbacz resigned as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company effective December 15, 2000. He subsequently resigned as an
employee of the Company effective as of January 5, 2001.

(4) As a result of Mr. Garbacz's resignation as an employee of the Company
effective as of January 5, 2001, Mr. Garbacz forfeited 145,000 shares of
restricted stock. Also in connection with his resignation, on January 12,
2001, Mr. Garbacz received a cash bonus of $70,000 upon the cancellation of
the remaining shares of restricted stock held by him.

(5) Mr. Albert joined the Company on April 17, 2000.

(6) Consists of 100,000 shares of restricted stock (granted when the price of
Nashua shares was $8.50), 33,333 shares of which will vest on April 17,
2001, 33,333 shares of which will vest on April 17, 2002 and 33,334 shares
of which will vest on April 17, 2003. Dividends, if any, will be paid on
the shares of restricted stock whether or not they are still subject to
restrictions. The vesting schedule for the restricted stock is subject to
acceleration upon death, disability or a change of control. However, upon
the termination of Mr. Albert's employment with the Company, any unvested
shares will forfeit to the Company.

(7) Consists of 50,000 shares of restricted stock (granted when the price of
Nashua shares was $8.50), 25,000 shares of which will vest if certain
performance targets are met for fiscal 2001 and 25,000 shares of which will
vest one year thereafter if Mr. Ireland is still an employee of the Company
at that time. Dividends, if any, will accumulate on the shares of
restricted stock and be paid when and if the underlying shares vest. The
vesting schedule for the restricted stock is subject to acceleration upon
death, disability or a change of control. However, upon the termination of
Mr. Ireland's employment with the Company, any unvested shares will forfeit
to the Company.

(8) The shares of restricted stock representing the amount shown were forfeited
by Mr. Ireland on July 12, 2000.

(9) Includes market value of performance based restricted stock as of the date
the performance target was met and such stock was acquired.

(10) Consists of 10,000 shares of restricted stock (granted when the price of
Nashua shares was $16.625), 5,000 shares of which will vest when the
average closing price of Nashua stock over a ten trading day period reaches
$19.00; and 5,000 shares of which will vest when the average closing price
of Nashua stock over a ten trading day period reaches $21.00. The vesting
schedule for the restricted stock is subject to acceleration upon death or
disability. Any shares of restricted stock that have not vested upon the
earlier of (i) May 12, 2003 or (ii) termination of employment, will be
forfeited. Dividends, if any, will accumulate on the shares of restricted
stock and be paid when and if the underlying shares vest.

(11) Consists of 10,000 shares of restricted stock (granted when the price of
Nashua shares was $16.00), 5,000 shares of which will vest when the average
closing price of Nashua stock over a ten trading day period reaches $21.00;
and 5,000 shares of which will vest when the average closing price of
Nashua stock over a ten trading day period reaches $23.00. The vesting
schedule for the restricted stock is subject to acceleration upon death or
disability. Any shares of restricted stock that have not vested upon the
earlier of (i) December 15, 2003 or (ii) termination of employment, will be
forfeited. Dividends, if any, will accumulate on the shares of restricted
stock and be paid when and if the underlying shares vest.

(12) Ms. DiGiovine became an executive officer of the Company in December 1999.

10
14

STOCK OPTIONS

The following table sets forth information on grants made during 2000 of
stock options to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table.
No stock appreciation rights were granted during 2000.

OPTION GRANTS IN 2000

POTENTIAL REALIZABLE
VALUE AT ASSUMED
ANNUAL RATES OF
NUMBER OF STOCK PRICE
SECURITIES PERCENT OF TOTAL APPRECIATION FOR
UNDERLYING OPTIONS GRANTED OPTION TERM(2)
OPTIONS TO EMPLOYEES EXERCISE PRICE EXPIRATION ---------------------
NAME GRANTED IN 2000 ($/SHARE)(1) DATE 5% 10%
- ---- ---------- ----------------- -------------- ---------- --------- ---------

Andrew B. Albert.............. 50,000(3) 31% $4.38 12/15/10 $137,728 $349,030

- ---------------
(1) The exercise price is equal to the fair market value of the Company's common
stock on the date of grant.

(2) These two columns show what the value of the options would be after ten
years if the market price of the Company's common stock increased 5% or 10%
each year for the ten years from the date the options were granted until the
options expired. To put this data into perspective, the resulting Nashua
stock prices for the grant expiring on December 15, 2010 would be $7.13 at a
5% rate of appreciation and $11.36 at a 10% rate of appreciation. This
information is required by the Securities and Exchange Commission and does
not mean that the Company predicts that these options will have any such
value nor that the market price of the Company's common stock will increase
by any specific amount. The actual value that these options will have
depends entirely on increases or decreases in the market price of the
Company's common stock and when the options are exercised.

(3) The option was granted under the 1999 Shareholder Value Plan. One half of
the option becomes exercisable on December 15, 2001 and the other half
becomes exercisable on December 15, 2002.

The following table sets forth information regarding the number and value
of unexercised options to purchase the Company's common stock held by the
executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table at the end of 2000.
No stock appreciation rights were exercised during 2000 or were outstanding at
the end of 2000. No stock options were exercised during 2000.

FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES

NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED,
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY, OPTIONS AT
OPTIONS AT FISCAL YEAR-END FISCAL YEAR-END(1)
--------------------------- ---------------------------
NAME EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
- ---- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------

Gerald G. Garbacz.................................. 120,000 30,000(2) $0 $0
Andrew B. Albert................................... 0 50,000 $0 $3,000
John J. Ireland.................................... 46,000 12,500 $0 $0
John L. Patenaude.................................. 27,000 12,500 $0 $0
Joseph R. Matson................................... 27,700 5,000 $0 $0
Donna J. DiGiovine................................. 14,250 11,250 $0 $0

- ---------------
(1) Option values are based on the difference between the closing price on the
New York Stock Exchange of the Company's common stock of $4.44 per share on
December 29, 2000 and the exercise price of the options.

(2) The unexercisable portion of these options terminated as a result of Mr.
Garbacz's resignation on January 5, 2001.

11
15

PENSION PLAN

Nashua provides retirement benefits to its salaried employees, including
the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, under the Nashua
Corporation Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees (the "Nashua Retirement
Plan"), which is a qualified retirement plan under the Internal Revenue Code.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 limits pensions that may be
paid under plans qualified under the Internal Revenue Code (the limit was
$170,000 in 2000). Pension amounts exceeding this limit may be paid outside of
qualified plans. Nashua has an unfunded Supplemental Excess Retirement Benefit
Plan ("SERP") that provides for additional retirement benefits to certain of its
employees, including Messrs. Garbacz, Ireland, Patenaude, Matson and Ms.
DiGiovine.

The following table sets forth the estimated annual benefits payable at
normal retirement age (65) under the Nashua Retirement Plan and the SERP
combined. Benefits under the Nashua Retirement Plan and the SERP last for the
life of the employee.

ESTIMATED PENSION BENEFITS

YEARS OF SERVICE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIVE YEAR AVERAGE 35 OR
COMPENSATION 5 YEARS 10 YEARS 15 YEARS 20 YEARS 25 YEARS 30 YEARS MORE YEARS
----------------- ------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------

$ 125,000............. $10,000 $ 20,000 $ 30,000 $ 40,000 $ 50,000 $ 60,000 $ 70,000
250,000............. 21,000 43,000 64,000 85,000 106,000 128,000 149,000
375,000............. 33,000 65,000 98,000 130,000 163,000 195,000 228,000
500,000............. 44,000 88,000 131,000 175,000 219,000 263,000 307,000
625,000............. 55,000 110,000 165,000 220,000 275,000 330,000 385,000
750,000............. 66,000 133,000 199,000 265,000 331,000 398,000 464,000
875,000............. 78,000 155,000 233,000 310,000 388,000 465,000 543,000
1,000,000............. 89,000 178,000 266,000 355,000 444,000 533,000 622,000

Compensation covered by the Nashua Retirement Plan and the SERP generally
refers to total annual cash compensation, including salary and bonus, but
excluding certain items such as the value of stock option awards and employer
allocations to the Company's Employees' Savings Plan. For purposes of the Nashua
Retirement Plan and the SERP, the five year average compensation is equal to the
average annual salary and bonus over the final five years of employment. The
annual salary and bonus for the current year for the executive officers named in
the Summary Compensation Table is indicated in the Annual Compensation column of
that table. As of December 31, 2000, the executive officers named in the Summary
Compensation Table had the following years of service credited under the Nashua
Retirement Plan and the SERP: Mr. Garbacz, 4 years; Mr. Albert, 0 years; Mr.
Ireland, 5.5 years; Mr. Patenaude, 8 years; Mr. Matson, 15 years; and Ms.
DiGiovine, 3 years.

Benefits as shown above are available for participants whose pensions start
after reaching age 65. Participants who have five or more years of service are
eligible to receive pensions after reaching age 60 and participants who have ten
or more years of service are eligible to receive pensions after reaching age 55,
but payments are reduced 4.2% per year for each year that a recipient starts
receiving benefits earlier than at age 65. Benefits under the Nashua Retirement
Plan and the SERP are computed on the basis of a straight life annuity. These
benefits are not subject to any deduction for Social Security or other offset.

SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS

The Company has entered into severance agreements with Messrs. Albert,
Ireland, Patenaude and Matson and Ms. DiGiovine in order to ensure their
continued service to Nashua in the event of a change in control of Nashua. These
severance agreements provide that upon termination of employment under certain
circumstances within three years after a change in control of Nashua, the
employee would receive severance pay equal to three times the sum of his or her
annual salary and bonus plus benefits, totalling an estimated $1,400,154,
$1,421,672, $841,000, $679,767, and $645,313, respectively, for the individuals
named above. In addition, Mr. Albert's and Mr. Ireland's severance agreements
provide that upon a change of control of Nashua any unvested portion of their
restricted stock will vest.

12
16

In addition, each employee can terminate his or her employment after a
change in control of Nashua and receive such severance pay if he or she
determines in good faith that any assignment of duties is inconsistent with his
or her duties prior to a change of control or certain action by the Company
results in a diminution in position, duties, authority or responsibilities. If
the employment of any of such employees is terminated by the Company apart from
the circumstances above for reasons other than misconduct, the executive would
receive one year's salary and certain other benefits. The value of this
compensation and benefits totals an estimated $356,000, $266,000, $201,000,
$166,000, and $166,000, respectively, for the individuals named above. The
Company had entered into a similar severance agreement with Mr. Garbacz, who
resigned as an employee of the Company on January 5, 2001.

THE LEADERSHIP AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Leadership and Compensation Committee is composed of non-employee
directors and is charged with the responsibility of screening candidates for the
chief executive officer position, developing performance evaluation criteria,
reviewing the caliber of key managers and succession to their positions and
deciding on senior management compensation. The Committee administers the
Company's Management Incentive Plan and the Company's stock option and stock
incentive plans. Each year the Committee reviews the performance of the Chief
Executive Officer against objectives and sets the Chief Executive Officer's base
salary. The Committee also reviews the performance and the salary levels of
other executive officers, including the executive officers named in the Summary
Compensation Table, and makes decisions regarding the above plans. In November
2000 the Committee, in the course of carrying out its responsibilities to
evaluate senior management performance and plan for management succession,
acting jointly with the Governance Committee and under the overall leadership of
the Lead Director, considered Mr. Garbacz's plans for retirement and the needs
of the Company and recommended to the Board that Mr. Albert succeed Mr. Garbacz
as Chief Executive Officer.

The Committee's compensation policies applicable to the Company's executive
officers during 2000 are set forth below:

The Committee believes that base salaries should be at competitive
levels so as to attract and retain well qualified executives. With respect
to the salary of the Chief Executive Officer, the Committee considered a
number of factors including survey data, the size and performance of the
Company, past practice at the Company, each Committee member's own
individual experiences in compensation matters and the inter-relationship
of salary to cash incentive compensation and long-term equity-based
compensation. The Committee also further tied overall compensation heavily
to stock performance by awarding options and restricted stock. Mr. Albert,
who was granted 100,000 shares of restricted stock vesting over a three
year period or earlier upon death, disability or change of control in
connection with Nashua's acquisition of Rittenhouse Paper Company, also
received options to purchase 50,000 shares of stock upon his election as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The Committee has also reviewed the
compensation of the Company's executive officers, including those executive
officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table, and has concluded that
the salaries for the executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation
Table are competitive with the salaries for similar positions included in
the survey data reviewed by the Committee.

The Committee believes that incentive compensation paid in cash should
be awarded to support company objectives based on company, group, division
and personal performance during the preceding year. The Company's
Management Incentive Plan provides that cash awards may be granted each
year by the Committee based on corporate, segment, division and personal
performance. For the individuals who served as Chief Executive Officer and
principal corporate staff officers, award targets for 2000 were based on
the Company's pretax operating income budget, total Company revenues and
personal performance objectives. For the Vice Presidents in charge of
operating units, award targets were based on the respective unit's pretax
operating income budget, total Company revenues and personal performance
objectives.

13
17

The Committee believes that long-term equity-based compensation should
be awarded to provide incentive to executives to create value for
stockholders and give the executives a substantive ownership interest in
the Company's success. The Committee's policy has been to award
performance-based restricted stock and stock option grants in order to more
closely align the interests of management with those of stockholders and to
attract and retain executives during a period when the Company has been
undergoing significant operational changes.

The Committee has not adopted a policy on the tax law disallowing
deductions on compensation in excess of $1 million for certain executives of
public companies. The Company believes that options and performance-based
restricted stock awards granted under its stock incentive plans are exempt from
the limitation and that other compensation expected to be paid during 2001 will
be below the compensation limitation.

Leadership and Compensation
Committee
James F. Orr III, Chairman
Avrum Gray
John M. Kucharski
David C. Miller, Jr.
Peter J. Murphy

14
18

STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change in
the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company's common stock against
the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Index and a composite peer group for
the five years commencing December 31, 1995 and ending December 31, 2000. A peer
group comparison is used because, offering a diverse mix of products and
services, the Company did not believe that a single industry or line-of-business
index provided an adequate measure for comparison to the Company as a whole.

The Company's products and services include thermal papers, thermosensitive
and pressure sensitive labels, and specialty papers, as well as toners and
developers. In constructing a composite peer group, the Company selected
published indices to represent various products. The indices are: for thermal
papers, thermosensitive and pressure sensitive labels and specialty
papers -- the S&P Paper and Forest Products Index, and for toners and
developers -- the S&P Office Equipment & Supplies Index. The Company then
weighted the two indices in proportion to the 2000 revenues of Nashua's products
and services represented by the respective indices.

[GRAPH]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nashua Corporation 100.00 88.07 85.31 97.69 55.04 32.58
S&P 500 Index 100.00 122.96 163.98 210.84 255.21 231.98
Composite Peer Group 100.00 112.11 126.37 137.36 172.29 138.60

15
19

REPORT OF THE AUDIT/FINANCE AND INVESTMENT COMMITTEE

The Audit/Finance and Investment Committee consists of the following four
members of the Company's Board of Directors: Charles S. Hoppin, Sheldon A.
Buckler, George R. Mrkonic, Jr., and Peter J. Murphy. The Committee operates
under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors, a copy of which is
attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A. The members of the Committee are
independent directors, as defined by its charter and the rules of the New York
Stock Exchange.

The Committee reviewed the Company's audited financial statements for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 and discussed these financial statements
with the Company's management. The Committee also reviewed and discussed the
audited financial statements and the matters required by Statement on Auditing
Standards 61 (Communication with Audit Committees) with Ernst & Young LLP, the
Company's independent auditors.

The Company's independent auditors also provided the Committee with the
written disclosures and the letter required by Independence Standards Board
Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees). In addition,
the Committee discussed with the independent auditors their independence from
the Company. The Committee also considered whether the independent auditors'
provision of certain other, non-audit related services to the Company is
compatible with maintaining their independence.

Based on its discussions with management and the independent auditors, and
its review of the representations and information provided by management and the
independent auditors, the Committee recommended to the Company's Board of
Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.

Audit/Finance and Investment Committee
Charles S. Hoppin, Chairman
Sheldon A. Buckler
George R. Mrkonic, Jr.
Peter J. Murphy

16
20

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

On March 10, 2000, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP informed the Company that it
did not intend to stand for reappointment as the Company's independent public
accountants for the year 2000. On March 13, 2000, with the approval of the
Audit/Finance and Investment Committee and the concurrence of the Board of
Directors, the Company engaged Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent
public accountants for the year 2000.

Prior to their engagement, neither the Company nor anyone on behalf of the
Company had consulted Ernst & Young regarding either the application of
accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed,
or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the financial statements
of the Company or any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement,
within the meaning of Item 304(a)(l)(iv) of Regulation S-K, or any reportable
event, as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(l)(v) of Regulation S-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers' reports on the financial statements of the Company
for each of the two fiscal years prior to March 2000 did not contain any adverse
opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and was not qualified or modified as to
uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle.

In connection with the audits by PricewaterhouseCoopers of the Company's
financial statements for the Company's two fiscal years, and the subsequent
interim periods, prior to March 2000 there were no disagreements with
PricewaterhouseCoopers on any matter of accounting principles or practices,
financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which
disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of PricewaterhouseCoopers,
would have caused them to make reference thereto in their report on the
financial statements for such years.

The Company requested that PricewaterhouseCoopers furnish it with a letter
addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or not it
agrees with the above statements. A copy of that letter, dated March 15, 2000,
was filed with the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 10, 2000 and
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2000.

AUDIT FEES

Ernst & Young LLP billed the Company an aggregate of $520,000 in fees for
professional services rendered in connection with the audit of the Company's
financial statements for the most recent fiscal year and the reviews of the
financial statements included in each of the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION FEES

Ernst & Young LLP billed the Company an aggregate of $150,000 in fees for
professional services rendered to the Company and its affiliates for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2000 in connection with the design and implementation of
financial information systems.

ALL OTHER FEES

Ernst & Young LLP billed the Company an aggregate of $700,000 in fees for
other services rendered to the Company and its affiliates for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2000, including audit related services of $560,000 and
non-audit services of $140,000. Audit related services generally include fees
for business acquisitions, accounting consultations and pension audits.

Financial information systems design and implementation fees consist
entirely of fees billed by the Ernst & Young consulting group prior to its sale
on May 27, 2000 to Cap Gemini, a separate French public company.

17
21

RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors has selected the firm of Ernst & Young LLP,
independent auditors, to be the Company's auditors for the year 2001 and
recommends to stockholders that they vote for ratification of that selection.

Ernst & Young LLP served in this capacity for the year 2000. Its
representatives will be present at the annual meeting and will have an
opportunity to make a statement and be available to respond to appropriate
questions.

The selection of independent auditors is approved annually by the Board of
Directors and subsequently submitted to the stockholders for ratification.
Although stockholder ratification of the Board of Directors' selection of Ernst
& Young LLP is not required by law, the Board of Directors believes that it is
advisable to give stockholders the opportunity to ratify this selection. If this
proposal is not approved at the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors will
reconsider its selection of Ernst & Young LLP.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG
LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR 2001.

SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS -- 2002 ANNUAL MEETING

Any stockholder proposal which is to be included in the proxy materials for
the 2002 annual meeting must be received by Nashua on or before November 28,
2001. Such proposals should be directed to Nashua Corporation, 11 Trafalgar
Square, 2nd Floor, Nashua, New Hampshire 03063, Attention: Suzanne L. Ansara,
Assistant Secretary.

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

The cost of solicitation of proxies will be borne by Nashua. In addition to
solicitations by mail, certain directors, officers and employees of Nashua may
solicit proxies in person or by use of other communication media. Nashua will
reimburse banks, brokerage firms and others for forwarding proxy materials to
beneficial owners of Nashua common stock. Nashua has also engaged Corporate
Investor Communications, Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies and has
agreed to pay $7,000 and out-of-pocket expenses for such efforts.

Nashua will provide free of charge to any stockholder from whom a proxy is
solicited pursuant to this proxy statement, upon written request from such
stockholder, a copy of Nashua's annual report filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on Form 10-K for Nashua's fiscal year ended December 31,
2000 without exhibits. Requests for such report should be directed to Nashua
Corporation, 11 Trafalgar Square, 2nd Floor, Nashua, New Hampshire 03063,
Attention: Suzanne L. Ansara, Assistant Secretary. Exhibits to such Form 10-K
will be provided upon request and payment of an appropriate processing fee.

OTHER MATTERS

If any other matters are properly brought before the annual meeting or any
adjournments of the meeting, the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy
intend to vote the proxies on such matters in accordance with their best
judgment, pursuant to the discretionary authority granted by the proxy.

ROBERT S. AMREIN
Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary

Nashua, New Hampshire
March 28, 2001

18
22

APPENDIX A

NASHUA CORPORATION
AUDIT/FINANCE AND INVESTMENT COMMITTEE
CHARTER

ORGANIZATION

This charter governs the operations of the Audit/Finance and Investment
Committee (the Committee). The Committee shall review and reassess the charter
at least annually and obtain the approval of the board of directors. The
Committee shall be appointed by the board of directors and shall comprise at
least three directors, each of whom are independent of management and the
Company. Members of the Committee shall be considered independent if they have
no relationship that may interfere with the exercise of their independence from
management and the Company. All Committee members shall be financially literate,
(or shall become financially literate within a reasonable period of time after
appointment to the Committee), and at least one member shall have accounting or
related financial management expertise.

STATEMENT OF POLICY

The Committee shall provide assistance to the board of directors in
fulfilling their oversight responsibility to the shareholders, potential
shareholders, the investment community, and others relating to the Company's
financial statements and the financial reporting process, the systems of
internal accounting and financial controls, the internal audit function, the
annual independent audit of the Company's financial statements, and the legal
compliance and ethics programs as established by management and the board. In so
doing, it is the responsibility of the Committee to maintain free and open
communication between the Committee, independent auditors, the internal auditors
and management of the Company. In discharging its oversight role, the Committee
is empowered to investigate any matter brought to its attention with full access
to all books, records, facilities, and personnel of the Company and the power to
retain outside counsel, or other experts for this purpose.

RESPONSIBILITIES AND PROCESSES

The primary responsibility of the Committee is to oversee the Company's
financial reporting process on behalf of the board and report the results of
their activities to the board. Management is responsible for preparing the
Company's financial statements, and the independent auditors are responsible for
auditing those financial statements. The Committee in carrying out its
responsibilities believes its policies and procedures should remain flexible, in
order to best react to changing conditions and circumstances. The Committee
should take the appropriate actions to set the overall corporate "tone" for
quality financial reporting, sound business risk practices, and ethical
behavior.

The following shall be the principal recurring processes of the Committee
in carrying out its oversight responsibilities. The processes are set forth as a
guide with the understanding that the Committee may supplement them as
appropriate.

- The Committee shall have a clear understanding with management and the
independent auditors that the independent auditors are ultimately
accountable to the board and the audit committee, as representatives of
the Company's shareholders. The Committee shall have the ultimate
authority and responsibility to evaluate and, where appropriate, replace
the independent auditors. The Committee shall discuss with the auditors
their independence from management and the Company and the matters
included in the written disclosures required by the Independence
Standards Board. Annually, the Committee will require the independent
auditors provide a written document delineating all non-audit
relationships between the auditor and the Company. Annually, the
Committee shall review and recommend to the board the selection of the
Company's independent auditors, subject to shareholders' approval.

A-1
23

- The Committee shall discuss with the internal auditors and the
independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective
audits including the adequacy of staffing and compensation. Also, the
Committee shall discuss with management, the internal auditors, and the
independent auditors the adequacy and effectiveness of the accounting and
financial controls, including the Company's system to monitor and manage
business risk, and legal and ethical compliance programs. Further, the
Committee shall meet separately with the internal auditors and the
independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the
results of their examinations.

- The Committee shall review the interim financial statements with
management and the independent auditors prior to the filing of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Also, the Committee shall
discuss the results of the quarterly review and any other matters
required to be communicated to the Committee by the independent auditors
under generally accepted auditing standards. The chair of the Committee
may represent the entire Committee for the purposes of this review.

- The Committee shall review with management and the independent auditors
the financial statements to be included in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K (or the annual report to shareholders if distributed prior to
the filing of Form 10-K), including their judgment about the quality, not
just acceptability, of accounting principles, the reasonableness of
significant judgments, and the clarity of the disclosures in the
financial statements. Also, the Committee shall discuss the results of
the annual audit and any other matters required to be communicated to the
Committee by the independent auditors under generally accepted auditing
standards.

- The Committee shall report to the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the New York Stock Exchange in accordance with rules and regulations for
audit committees.

A-2
24
NASHUA CORPORATION

c/o EquiServe
P.O. Box 9398
Boston, MA 02205-9398

Nashua Stockholders:

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Nashua Corporation will be held at 10:00
a.m. on Tuesday, May 8, 2001, at the Crowne Plaza, 2 Somerset Parkway, Nashua,
New Hampshire.

The Proxies will vote your shares in accordance with your directions on this
proxy card. If you sign and return the proxy card and do not indicate your
choices, the Proxies will vote your shares in accordance with the directors'
recommendations.

Please fill in the boxes to indicate how your shares should be voted, sign and
date the proxy card and return it as soon as possible in the enclosed postpaid
envelope. If you do not sign and return the proxy card, the Proxies cannot vote
your shares at the Annual Meeting.

Robert S. Amrein
Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary

DETACH HERE

[X] Please mark votes
as in this example.

NOTE: Signature should be exactly as name appears on imprint. If stock is
registered in the names of two or more persons as joint owners, trustees or
otherwise, this proxy should be personally signed by each of them or accompanied
by proof of authority of less than all to act. In the case of executors,
administrators, trustees, guardians and attorneys, unless the stock is
registered in their names, proof of authority should accompany this proxy.

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR Proposal 1.

1. Election of Directors.

Nominees: Andrew B. Albert, Sheldon A. Buckler, Avrum Gray,
John M. Kucharski, George R. Mrkonic, Jr., Peter J.
Murphy, James F. Orr III, Mark E. Schwarz

For All Nominees Withheld From All Nominees
[ ] [ ]

[ ] _________________________________________________
For all nominees except as noted above

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR Proposal 2.

2. Ratification of Independent Auditors

For Against Abstain
[ ] [ ] [ ]

MARK HERE FOR ADDRESS CHANGE AND NOTE AT LEFT [ ]

PLEASE FILL IN DATE, SIGN AND MAIL THIS PROXY
IN THE ENCLOSED POSTPAID RETURN ENVELOPE.

Signature:________________________ Date:__________

Signature:________________________ Date: __________
25

DETACH HERE

PROXY

NASHUA CORPORATION

PROXY for Annual Meeting of Stockholders - May 8, 2001

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoint(s) ROBERT S. AMREIN, JOSEPH R. MATSON and JOHN L.
PATENAUDE and each of them attorneys or attorney of the undersigned (with full
power of substitution in them and in each of them), for and in the name(s) of
the undersigned to vote and act at the annual meeting of stockholders of Nashua
Corporation, to be held at the Crowne Plaza, 2 Somerset Parkway, Nashua, New
Hampshire, on May 8, 2001 at 10:00 a.m., or any adjournment thereof, upon or in
respect of all shares of stock of Nashua Corporation upon or in respect of which
the undersigned would be entitled to vote or act, and with all the powers the
undersigned would possess, if personally present, upon all matters which may
properly come before said meeting, as described in the Proxy Statement and
Notice dated March 28, 2001, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged.

UNLESS A CONTRARY DIRECTION IS INDICATED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL
NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1 AND FOR THE RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS IN PROPOSAL 2 AS MORE SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN THE PROXY
STATEMENT; IF SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS ARE INDICATED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN
ACCORDANCE THEREWITH.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ALL NOMINEES NAMED IN PROPOSAL 1
AND A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS IN
PROPOSAL 2.

IN THEIR DISCRETION, THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE UPON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS
AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT THEREOF.

SEE REVERSE CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE SEE REVERSE
SIDE SIDE