- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 1-13953
W. R. GRACE & CO.
Delaware 65-0773649
- ---------------------------------- ---------------------------
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
7500 Grace Drive
Columbia, Maryland 21044
(410) 531-4000
-----------------------------------------
(Address and phone number of principal
executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
----------- ----------
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes X No
----------- ----------
65,762,897 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, were outstanding at July 31,
2004.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W. R. GRACE & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table of Contents
-----------------
Page No.
--------
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
- ------
Item 1. Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm I - 1
Consolidated Statements of Operations I - 2
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows I - 3
Consolidated Balance Sheets I - 4
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (Deficit) I - 5
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) I - 5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements I - 6 to I - 23
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations I - 24 to I - 35
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk I - 36
Item 4. Controls and Procedures I - 36
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
- -------
Item 1. Legal Proceedings II - 1
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K II - 1 to II - 2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of
Directors of W. R. Grace & Co.:
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of W. R. Grace &
Co. and its subsidiaries as of June 30, 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, of shareholders' equity (deficit), and of
comprehensive income (loss) for each of the three-month and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003, and the consolidated statements of cash
flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003. These
interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
We conducted our review in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making
inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying consolidated interim financial statements for them
to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
The accompanying consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note
1 to the consolidated interim financial statements, on April 2, 2001, the
Company and substantially all of its domestic subsidiaries voluntarily filed for
protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, which raises
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern in
its present form. The accompanying consolidated interim financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
We previously audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of
cash flows, of shareholders' equity (deficit) and of comprehensive income (loss)
for the year then ended (not presented herein). Our report, which was modified
as to a matter raising substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue
as a going concern, was dated January 27, 2004 (except for Note 1A of the
financial statements referred to above). In our opinion, the information set
forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003, is
fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance
sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
McLean, Virginia
August 6, 2004
I-1
=======================================================================================================================
W. R. GRACE & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
=======================================================================================================================
In millions, except per share amounts 2004 2003 2004 2003
-----------------------------------------------------
Net sales..................................................... $ 572.4 $ 503.4 $ 1,090.9 $ 948.2
-----------------------------------------------------
Cost of goods sold, exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below....................... 357.6 329.7 689.3 626.4
Selling, general and administrative expenses, exclusive of
net pension expense shown separately below................ 112.2 94.7 214.4 186.4
Depreciation and amortization ................................ 26.3 25.3 53.5 50.0
Research and development expenses ............................ 13.0 14.2 25.7 28.3
Net pension expense .......................................... 14.9 13.2 27.2 26.7
Interest expense and related financing costs ................. 3.9 4.1 7.8 8.3
Other expense (income) ....................................... 4.6 (2.1) 1.4 (7.9)
Provision for environmental remediation ...................... -- 0.5 -- 2.5
-----------------------------------------------------
532.5 479.6 1,019.3 920.7
-----------------------------------------------------
Income before Chapter 11 expenses, income taxes, and minority
interest.................................................. 39.9 23.8 71.6 27.5
Chapter 11 expenses, net ..................................... (3.0) (6.8) (7.5) (9.5)
Provision for income taxes.................................... (13.0) (10.2) (23.9) (13.3)
Minority interest in consolidated entities.................... (2.6) (0.3) (3.1) (0.5)
-----------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME ............................................... $ 21.3 $ 6.5 $ 37.1 $ 4.2
=======================================================================================================================
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
Net income ............................................... $ 0.32 $ 0.10 $ 0.57 $ 0.06
Average number of basic shares ............................... 65.6 65.5 65.6 65.5
DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
Net income ............................................... $ 0.32 $ 0.10 $ 0.56 $ 0.06
Average number of diluted shares.............................. 65.8 65.6 65.8 65.6
=======================================================================================================================
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
I-2
=========================================================================================================================
W. R. GRACE & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES SIX MONTHS ENDED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED) JUNE 30,
=========================================================================================================================
In millions 2004 2003
----------------------------
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Income before Chapter 11 expenses, income taxes, and minority interest................... $ 71.6 $ 27.5
Reconciliation to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization ...................................................... 53.5 50.0
Interest accrued on pre-petition debt subject to compromise......................... 5.4 5.8
Loss on sales of investments and disposals of assets................................ 0.3 0.9
Provision for environmental remediation............................................. -- 2.5
Income from life insurance policies, net............................................ (2.2) (4.3)
Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding effect of businesses
acquired/divested and foreign currency translation:
Working capital items........................................................... (41.6) (42.2)
Payments to fund defined benefit pension arrangements........................... (5.2) (3.0)
Payments under postretirement benefit programs.................................. (5.5) (5.7)
Expenditures for asbestos-related litigation ................................... (3.8) (5.8)
Proceeds from asbestos-related insurance ....................................... 5.4 10.2
Expenditures for environmental remediation ..................................... (2.9) (6.0)
Expenditures for retained obligations of divested businesses ................... (0.7) (0.7)
Pension expense and other non-cash items........................................ 31.4 28.4
----------------------------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND CHAPTER 11 EXPENSES 105.7 57.6
Chapter 11 expenses paid, net ........................................................... (6.1) (10.2)
Income taxes paid, net of refunds ....................................................... (13.8) (11.7)
----------------------------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES .......................................... 85.8 35.7
----------------------------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures for property and equipment.......................................... (22.5) (44.8)
Businesses acquired, net of cash acquired ............................................... -- (2.2)
Investment in life insurance policies.................................................... (11.4) (9.1)
Proceeds from life insurance policies.................................................... 10.5 5.4
Proceeds from sales of investments and disposals of assets............................... 1.3 0.8
----------------------------
NET CASH USED FOR INVESTING ACTIVITIES ............................................. (22.1) (49.9)
----------------------------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net change in loans secured by cash value of life insurance policies .................... (2.7) (1.4)
Borrowings under credit facilities, net of repayments.................................... 6.3 4.7
Borrowings under debtor-in-possession facility, net of fees ............................. (1.0) 27.0
Proceeds from exercise of stock options.................................................. 0.2 --
----------------------------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES .......................................... 2.8 30.3
----------------------------
Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents ................... (4.0) 18.2
----------------------------
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS .............................................. 62.5 34.3
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period .......................................... 309.2 283.6
----------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period ................................................ $ 371.7 $ 317.9
=========================================================================================================================
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
I-3
==========================================================================================================
W. R. GRACE & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) 2004 2003
==========================================================================================================
In millions, except par value and shares
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents................................................ $ 371.7 $ 309.2
Accounts and other receivables, net...................................... 400.8 347.5
Inventories.............................................................. 224.3 214.6
Deferred income taxes.................................................... 29.5 29.8
Other current assets..................................................... 22.6 27.8
-------------------------------
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS ............................................... 1,048.9 928.9
Properties and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization of $1,242.2 (2003 - $1,216.9).......................... 621.7 656.6
Goodwill................................................................. 84.8 85.2
Cash value of life insurance policies, net of policy loans............... 96.6 90.8
Deferred income taxes.................................................... 613.7 587.1
Asbestos-related insurance expected to be realized after one year........ 264.0 269.4
Other assets............................................................. 257.3 256.2
-------------------------------
TOTAL ASSETS ....................................................... $ 2,987.0 $ 2,874.2
===============================
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
LIABILITIES NOT SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Debt payable within one year............................................. $ 13.0 $ 6.8
Accounts payable......................................................... 114.8 101.8
Income taxes payable..................................................... 25.3 16.6
Other current liabilities................................................ 145.4 129.2
-------------------------------
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES .......................................... 298.5 254.4
Deferred income taxes.................................................... 34.3 35.3
Unfunded defined benefit pension liability............................... 315.6 278.5
Other liabilities........................................................ 60.2 17.5
-------------------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES NOT SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE......................... 708.6 585.7
LIABILITIES SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE - NOTE 2............................... 2,447.5 2,452.3
-------------------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES................................................... 3,156.1 3,038.0
-------------------------------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Common stock issued, par value $0.01; 300,000,000 shares authorized;
outstanding: 2004 - 65,730,213 (2003 - 65,558,510).................. 0.8 0.8
Paid-in capital.......................................................... 430.5 432.1
Accumulated deficit...................................................... (133.8) (170.9)
Treasury stock, at cost: shares: 2004 - 11,249,547 (2003 - 11,421,250).. (133.9) (135.9)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss..................................... (332.7) (289.9)
-------------------------------
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)................................ (169.1) (163.8)
-------------------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)................ $ 2,987.0 $ 2,874.2
==========================================================================================================
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
I-4
=========================================================================================================================
W. R. GRACE & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) (UNAUDITED)
=========================================================================================================================
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS'
Common Stock and Accumulated Treasury Accumulated Other EQUITY
In millions Paid-in Capital Deficit Stock Comprehensive Loss (DEFICIT)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2004.............. $ 432.4 $ (155.1) $ (135.2) $ (294.9) $ (152.8)
Net income........................... -- 21.3 -- -- 21.3
Stock plan activity.................. (1.1) -- 1.3 -- 0.2
Other comprehensive (loss) income.... -- -- -- (37.8) (37.8)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE, JUNE 30, 2004............... $ 431.3 $ (133.8) $ (133.9) $ (332.7) $ (169.1)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2003........... $ 432.9 $ (170.9) $ (135.9) $ (289.9) $ (163.8)
Net income........................... -- 37.1 -- -- 37.1
Stock plan activity.................. (1.6) -- 2.0 -- 0.4
Other comprehensive (loss) income.... -- -- -- (42.8) (42.8)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE, JUNE 30, 2004............... $ 431.3 $ (133.8) $ (133.9) $ (332.7) $ (169.1)
=========================================================================================================================
=========================================================================================================================
W. R. GRACE & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME (UNAUDITED) JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
=========================================================================================================================
In millions 2004 2003 2004 2003
---------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME........................................................ $ 21.3 $ 6.5 $ 37.1 $ 4.2
---------------------------------------------------
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
Foreign currency translation adjustments.......................... (2.5) 40.0 (7.5) 49.4
Minimum pension liability adjustments, net of income taxes........ (35.3) -- (35.3) --
---------------------------------------------------
Total other comprehensive (loss) income........................... (37.8) 40.0 (42.8) 49.4
---------------------------------------------------
COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME ...................................... $ (16.5) $ 46.5 $ (5.7) $ 53.6
=========================================================================================================================
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
I-5
W. R. GRACE & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
REPORTING POLICIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W. R. Grace & Co., through its subsidiaries, is engaged in specialty chemicals
and specialty materials businesses on a worldwide basis through two business
segments: "Davison Chemicals," which includes two product groups - refining
technologies and specialty materials; and "Performance Chemicals," which
includes three product groups - specialty construction chemicals, building
materials, and sealants and coatings.
W. R. Grace & Co. conducts substantially all of its business through a direct,
wholly owned subsidiary, W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. ("Grace-Conn."). Grace-Conn.
owns substantially all of the assets, properties and rights of W. R. Grace & Co.
on a consolidated basis, either directly or through subsidiaries.
As used in these notes, the term "Company" refers to W. R. Grace & Co. The term
"Grace" refers to the Company and/or one or more of its subsidiaries and, in
certain cases, their respective predecessors.
VOLUNTARY BANKRUPTCY FILING: In response to a sharply increasing number of
asbestos-related bodily injury claims, on April 2, 2001 (the "Filing Date"), W.
R. Grace & Co. and 61 of its United States subsidiaries and affiliates,
including Grace-Conn. (collectively, the "Debtors"), filed voluntary petitions
for reorganization (the "Filing") under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code ("Chapter 11" or the "Bankruptcy Code") in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Bankruptcy Court"). The
cases were consolidated and are being jointly administered under case number
01-01139 (the "Chapter 11 Cases"). Grace's non-U.S. subsidiaries and certain of
its U.S. subsidiaries were not included in the Filing.
During 2000 and the first quarter of 2001, Grace experienced several adverse
developments in its asbestos-related litigation, including: a significant
increase in bodily injury claims, higher than expected costs to resolve bodily
injury and certain property damage claims, and class action lawsuits alleging
damages from a former attic insulation product. (These claims are discussed in
more detail in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.) After a
thorough review of these developments, the Board of Directors of Grace concluded
on April 2, 2001 that a federal court-supervised Chapter 11 process provided the
best forum available to achieve predictability and fairness in the claims
settlement process. Under Chapter 11, the Debtors have continued to operate
their businesses as debtors-in-possession under court protection from their
creditors and claimants, while using the Chapter 11 process to develop and
implement a plan for addressing the asbestos-related claims against them. Since
the Filing, all motions necessary to conduct normal business activities have
been approved by the Bankruptcy Court.
The Debtors intend to address all of their pending and future asbestos-related
claims and all other pre-petition claims in a plan of reorganization. The
interests of the Company's shareholders could be substantially diluted or
cancelled under a plan of reorganization. The value of Grace common stock
following a plan of reorganization, and the extent of any recovery by
non-asbestos-related creditors, will depend principally on the ultimate value
assigned to Grace's asbestos-related claims, which will be addressed through the
Bankruptcy Court proceedings.
Status of Chapter 11 Proceedings - As a consequence of the Filing, pending
litigation against the Debtors for pre-petition matters is generally stayed
(subject to certain exceptions in the case of governmental authorities), and no
party may take action to realize its pre-petition claims except pursuant to an
order of the Bankruptcy Court.
As provided by the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors had the exclusive right to
propose a plan of reorganization for a 120-day period following the Filing Date.
The Debtors have received extensions of their exclusivity period through
November 24, 2004, and extensions of the Debtors' exclusive right to solicit
acceptances of a plan of reorganization through January 24, 2005. In connection
with this most recent extension, the Debtors are required to file a proposed
plan of reorganization by October 14, 2004. (See "Plan of Reorganization" for
more information.)
Three creditors' committees, two representing asbestos claimants and the third
representing other unsecured creditors, and a committee representing
shareholders have been appointed in the Chapter 11 Cases. These committees, and
a legal representative of future asbestos claimants (appointed in May 2004),
have the right to be heard on all matters that come before the Bankruptcy Court
and are likely to play important
I-6
roles in the Chapter 11 Cases. The Debtors are required to bear certain costs
and expenses of the committees and of the future asbestos claimants'
representative, including those of their counsel and financial advisors.
The Debtors' Chapter 11 cases had been assigned to Judge Alfred M. Wolin, a
senior federal judge who sat in Newark, New Jersey. Judge Wolin was presiding
over asbestos bodily injury matters and the fraudulent conveyance litigation
described below. He assigned the Debtors' other bankruptcy matters to Judge
Judith Fitzgerald, a U.S. bankruptcy judge from the Western District of
Pennsylvania, sitting in Wilmington, Delaware. On May 17, 2004, a federal
appeals court recused Judge Wolin and on May 27, 2004, Judge Ronald L.
Buckwalter, a District Court Judge from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania,
was assigned to the Chapter 11 Cases.
Claims Filings - The Bankruptcy Court established a bar date of March 31, 2003
for claims of general unsecured creditors, asbestos-related property damage
claims and medical monitoring claims related to asbestos. The bar date did not
apply to asbestos-related bodily injury claims or claims related to Zonolite
attic insulation ("ZAI"), which will be dealt with separately.
Approximately 15,000 proofs of claim were filed by the bar date. Of these
claims, approximately 10,000 were non-asbestos related, approximately 4,000 were
for asbestos-related property damage, and approximately 1,000 were for medical
monitoring. In addition, approximately 500 proofs of claim were filed after the
bar date.
Approximately 7,000 of the 10,000 non-asbestos related claims involve claims by
employees or former employees for future retirement benefits such as pension and
retiree medical coverage. Grace views most of these claims as contingent and
does not plan to address them until a later date in the Chapter 11 proceeding.
The other non-asbestos related claims include claims for payment for goods and
services; taxes; product warranties; principal plus interest under pre-petition
credit facilities; amounts due under leases; leases and other executory
contracts rejected in the Bankruptcy Court; environmental remediation;
indemnification or contribution from actual or potential co-defendants in
asbestos-related and other litigation; pending non-asbestos-related litigation;
and non-asbestos-related personal injury.
The Debtors' analysis indicates that many claims are duplicates, represent the
same claim filed against more than one of the Debtors, lack any supporting
documentation, or provide insufficient supporting documentation. As of June 30,
2004, the Debtors had filed with the Bankruptcy Court objections to
approximately 1,400 claims, most objections of which were non-substantive
(duplicates, no supporting documentation, late filed claims, etc.). The Debtors
expect to file objections to a substantial number of additional claims, most
objections of which will be substantive, as analysis and evaluation of the
claims progresses. However, based on its initial claims analysis and other
available information, Grace increased its estimated liability for
asbestos-related litigation and environmental remediation as discussed in Notes
3 and 12. No other changes to Filing Date liabilities are deemed warranted at
this time.
The medical monitoring claims were made by individuals who allege exposure to
asbestos through Grace's products or operations. These claims, if sustained,
would require Grace to fund ongoing health monitoring costs for qualified
claimants. However, based on the number and expected cost of such claims, Grace
does not believe such claims will have a material effect on its Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Grace believes that its recorded liabilities represent a reasonable estimate of
the ultimate allowable amount for claims that are not in dispute or have been
submitted with sufficient information to both evaluate merit and estimate the
cost of the claim. However, because of the uncertainties of the Chapter 11 and
litigation process, the in-progress state of Grace's efforts to resolve disputed
claims, and the lack of documentation in support of many claims, such recorded
liabilities may prove to be insufficient to satisfy all of such claims. As
claims are resolved, or where better information becomes available and is
evaluated, Grace will make adjustments to the liabilities recorded on its
financial statements as appropriate. Any such adjustments could be material to
its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Litigation Proceedings in Bankruptcy Court - In July 2002, the Bankruptcy Court
approved special counsel to represent, at the Debtors' expense, the ZAI
claimants in a proceeding to determine certain threshold scientific issues
regarding ZAI. The Bankruptcy Court has established October 18 and 19, 2004 as
the dates for oral arguments of pending motions. (See Note 3 for background
information.)
I-7
In September 2000, Grace was named in a purported class action lawsuit filed in
California Superior Court for the County of San Francisco, alleging that the
1996 reorganization involving a predecessor of Grace and Fresenius Medical Care
Holdings, Inc. ("Fresenius") and the 1998 reorganization involving a predecessor
of Grace and Sealed Air Corporation ("Sealed Air") were fraudulent transfers.
The Bankruptcy Court authorized the Official Committee of Asbestos Personal
Injury Claimants and the Official Committee of Asbestos Property Damage
Claimants to proceed with claims against Fresenius and Sealed Air on behalf of
the Debtors' estates.
On November 29, 2002, Sealed Air and Fresenius each announced that they had
reached agreements in principle with such Committees to settle asbestos and
fraudulent conveyance claims related to such transactions. Under the terms of
the Fresenius settlement, as subsequently revised and subject to certain
conditions, Fresenius would contribute $115.0 million to the Debtors' estate as
directed by the Bankruptcy Court upon confirmation of the Debtors' plan of
reorganization, subject to the fulfillment of specified conditions. In July
2003, the Fresenius settlement was approved by the Bankruptcy Court. Under the
terms of the proposed Sealed Air settlement, Sealed Air would make a payment of
$512.5 million (plus interest at 5.5% per annum, commencing on December 21,
2002) and nine million shares of Sealed Air common stock (valued at $479.4
million as of June 30, 2004), as directed by the Bankruptcy Court upon
confirmation of the Debtors' plan of reorganization. The Sealed Air settlement
has not been agreed to by the Debtors and remains subject to the approval of the
Bankruptcy Court and the fulfillment of specified conditions. The Debtors are
unable to predict how these settlements may ultimately affect their plan of
reorganization.
Plan of Reorganization - As noted under "Status of Chapter 11 Proceedings," the
Debtors' are required to submit a proposed plan of reorganization (the "Plan")
by October 14, 2004. In the Plan, the Debtors will propose how to resolve their
pre-petition liabilities and contingencies, including undisputed trade-related,
employee-related and financing-related claims, as well as liabilities associated
with asbestos-related litigation, environmental remediation, tax matters and
other claims filed with the Bankruptcy Court that the Debtors may dispute.
One of the most important issues to be addressed and resolved in the proposed
Plan is the determination of the amounts payable in respect of the Debtors'
asbestos-related bodily injury liabilities. Grace has asserted that, in order to
receive compensation, claimants must be able to demonstrate that health
impairment exists and that it was caused by exposure to Grace products. Shortly
after the Filing Date, the Debtors proposed a case management order under which
the Bankruptcy Court would adjudicate key common issues involved in determining
the Debtors' liability for bodily injury claims. This proposal remains pending
before the Bankruptcy Court. Since the Debtors are required to submit a proposed
Plan in October, the Debtors are developing an alternative proposal for
addressing bodily injury claims that would expedite confirmation of a Plan by
establishing a trust through which such liabilities would be resolved, either
through settlement or through post-confirmation litigation. The proposed Plan
would require a determination of the size of the trust necessary to satisfy
compensable present and future claims. The Debtors' are in the process of
estimating the resolution cost of bodily injury claims for purposes of this
alternative proposal and such estimate, once finalized, may be materially
different from the currently recorded liability.
In the proposed Plan, the Debtors are likely to make use of Section 524(g) of
the Bankruptcy Code to create and fund the trust to satisfy all current and
future asbestos-related claims, including bodily injury, property damage and ZAI
claims. If a Plan is confirmed under Section 524(g), the Bankruptcy Court would
issue a permanent injunction barring the assertion of present and future
asbestos-related claims against the Debtors, their affiliates and other related
parties, and channeling such claims to the trust for resolution. In addition,
Grace may be required to issue to the trust (either immediately or upon the
occurrence of specified contingencies) a majority of the shares of its common
stock (or other voting securities).
Further, if the terms and conditions set forth in the settlement agreements with
Sealed Air and Fresenius are satisfied, which include the establishment of a
Section 524(g) trust, then the amounts to be paid by Sealed Air and Fresenius
would be available to the Debtors' estate or the Section 524(g) trust to fund
the Debtors' liabilities.
Recently, federal legislation has been proposed to address asbestos-related
bodily injury litigation. Such legislation could substantially change the type
of Plan that the Debtors ultimately propose. Because the passage of any such
legislation is speculative at this time, the Debtors proposed Plan will assume
that no legislation is passed during the confirmation process
I-8
that would resolve or otherwise determine the amount of the Debtors'
asbestos-related bodily injury liabilities. Furthermore, the proposed
legislation is unlikely to apply to the Debtors' asbestos-related property
damage or ZAI claims, which the Debtors still would expect to resolve through
the Chapter 11 process.
The Chapter 11 proceedings, including the proposed Plan due in October or any
revised Plan, could result in allowable claims that differ materially from
recorded amounts or amounts in the proposed Plan. Grace will continue to adjust
its estimates of allowable claims as facts come to light during the Chapter 11
process that justify a change, and as Chapter 11 proceedings establish the
amount of Grace's pre-petition liabilities.
Impact on Debt Capital - All of the Debtors' pre-petition debt is in default due
to the Filing. The accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2004
reflects the classification of the Debtors' pre-petition debt within
"liabilities subject to compromise."
The Debtors have entered into a debtor-in-possession post-petition loan and
security agreement with Bank of America, N.A. (the "DIP facility") in the
aggregate amount of $250 million. The term of the DIP facility expires on April
1, 2006.
Accounting Impact - The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been
prepared in accordance with Statement of Position 90-7 ("SOP 90-7"), "Financial
Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code," promulgated
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. SOP 90-7 requires
that financial statements of debtors-in-possession be prepared on a going
concern basis, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of
assets and liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of business.
However, as a result of the Filing, the realization of certain of Debtors'
assets and the liquidation of certain of Debtors' liabilities are subject to
significant uncertainty. While operating as debtors-in-possession, the Debtors
may sell or otherwise dispose of assets and liquidate or settle liabilities for
amounts other than those reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Further, a plan of reorganization could materially change the amounts and
classifications reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements, which do not
currently give effect to any adjustments to the carrying value or classification
of assets or liabilities that might be necessary as a consequence of a plan of
reorganization.
Pursuant to SOP 90-7, Grace's pre-petition liabilities that are subject to
compromise are required to be reported separately on the balance sheet at an
estimate of the amount that will ultimately be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court.
As of June 30, 2004, such pre-petition liabilities include fixed obligations
(such as debt and contractual commitments), as well as estimates of costs
related to contingent liabilities (such as asbestos-related litigation,
environmental remediation, and other claims). The recorded amounts of such
liabilities generally reflect accounting measurements as of the Filing Date,
adjusted as warranted for changes in facts and circumstances, new information
obtained in the claims review process, and/or rulings under Grace's Chapter 11
proceedings subsequent to the Filing. (See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for detail of the liabilities subject to compromise.) Obligations of
Grace subsidiaries not covered by the Filing continue to be classified on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets based upon maturity dates or the expected dates of
payment. SOP 90-7 also requires separate reporting of certain expenses, realized
gains and losses, and provisions for losses related to the Filing as
reorganization items.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION: The interim Consolidated Financial Statements presented
herein are unaudited and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated
Financial Statements presented in the Company's 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Such interim Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments that, in
the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results
of the interim periods presented. Potential accounting adjustments discovered
during normal reporting and accounting processes are evaluated on the basis of
materiality, both individually and in the aggregate, and are recorded in the
accounting period discovered, unless a restatement of a prior period is
necessary. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated.
The results of operations for the six-month interim period ended June 30, 2004
are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be realized
for the year ending December 31, 2004.
RECLASSIFICATIONS: Certain amounts in prior years' Consolidated Financial
Statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2004 presentation.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: Grace periodically enters into foreign exchange forward
contracts to manage exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
I-9
rates. Such instruments are viewed as risk management tools by Grace and are not
used for trading or speculative purposes. All such instruments are recorded on
the balance sheet at fair value with any gain or loss recognized in earnings.
(See Note 5.)
EFFECT OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS: In December 2003, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board ("FASB") revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 132, "Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits," to require additional disclosure about the assets,
obligations, cash flows, and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit plans
and other postretirement plans. Grace adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 132 in
December 2003. (See Note 13.)
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46"). Grace adopted the provisions of FIN 46
in 2002. The adoption of FIN 46 required Grace to consolidate Advanced Refining
Technologies LLC, a joint venture between Grace and Chevron Products Company.
The impact of this consolidation did not result in a material change to Grace's
Consolidated Financial Statements.
STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS: SFAS No. 123 permits the Company to follow the
measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and not recognize compensation
expense for options issued under its stock-based incentive plans. Had
compensation cost for the Company's stock-based incentive compensation plans
been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates of awards under those
plans, consistent with the fair value methodology prescribed by SFAS No. 123,
the Company's net income and related earnings per share for the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 would have been reduced to the
pro forma amounts indicated below:
================================================================================
PRO FORMA EARNINGS
UNDER SFAS NO. 123 THREE MONTHS SIX MONTHS
(In millions, except ENDED ENDED
per share amounts) JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
================================================================================
2004 2003 2004 2003
--------------------------------------
Net income, as reported ................. $ 21.3 $ 6.5 $ 37.1 $ 4.2
Deduct:
Total stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value
based method for all awards, net of
related tax effects ................... -- (0.3) (0.1) (0.7)
--------------------------------------
Pro forma net income (1) ............... $ 21.3 $ 6.2 $ 37.0 $ 3.5
======================================
Basic earnings per share:
As reported ............................. $ 0.32 $0.10 $ 0.57 $ 0.06
Pro forma net income (1) ................ $ 0.32 $0.09 $ 0.56 $ 0.05
Diluted earnings per share:
As reported ............................. $ 0.32 $0.10 $ 0.56 $ 0.06
Pro forma net income (1) ................ $ 0.32 $0.09 $ 0.56 $ 0.05
================================================================================
(1) Due to Grace's Chapter 11 Filing, these pro forma amounts may not be
indicative of future income and earnings per share.
To determine compensation cost under SFAS No. 123, the fair value of each option
is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
There were no option grants in the first half of 2004 and the year ended 2003.
USE OF ESTIMATES: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires that management make
estimates and assumptions affecting the assets and liabilities reported at the
date of the Consolidated Financial Statements, and the revenues and expenses
reported for the periods presented. Actual amounts could differ from those
estimates. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period identified. Grace's
I-10
accounting measurements that are most affected by management's estimates of
future events are:
o Contingent liabilities such as asbestos-related matters (see Note 3),
environmental remediation (see Note 12), income taxes (see Note 12), and
retained obligations of divested businesses.
o Pension and postretirement liabilities that depend on assumptions regarding
discount rates and/or total returns on invested funds.
o Depreciation and amortization periods for long-lived assets, including
property and equipment, intangible, and other assets.
o Realization values of various assets such as net deferred tax assets, trade
receivables, inventories, insurance receivables, income taxes, and goodwill.
The accuracy of these and other estimates may also be materially affected by
uncertainties arising under the Chapter 11 Cases.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. CHAPTER 11 RELATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a result of the Filing, Grace's Consolidated Balance Sheets separately
identify the liabilities that are "subject to compromise" as a result of the
Chapter 11 proceedings. In Grace's case, "liabilities subject to compromise"
represent pre-petition liabilities as determined under U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. Changes to the recorded amount of such liabilities will
be based on developments in the Chapter 11 Cases and management's assessment of
the claim amounts that will ultimately be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court.
Changes to pre-petition liabilities subsequent to the Filing Date reflect: 1)
cash payments under approved court orders; 2) the accrual of interest on
pre-petition debt at the pre-petition contractual rate; 3) accruals for
employee-related programs; and 4) changes in estimates related to pre-petition
contingent liabilities.
Components of liabilities subject to compromise are as follows:
========================================================================
(In millions) JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
(Unaudited) 2004 2003
========================================================================
Debt, pre-petition plus accrued interest . $ 557.2 $ 552.7
Asbestos-related liability ................ 988.4 992.3
Income taxes .............................. 224.9 217.9
Environmental remediation ................. 329.5 332.4
Postretirement benefits other than pension. 127.7 134.3
Unfunded special pension arrangements ..... 70.4 69.5
Retained obligations of divested businesses 56.4 57.0
Accounts payable .......................... 31.4 31.9
Other accrued liabilities ................. 61.6 64.3
--------------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE ... $ 2,447.5 $ 2,452.3
========================================================================
Set forth below is a reconciliation of the changes in pre-filing date liability
balances for the period from the Filing Date through June 30, 2004.
=============================================================
(In millions) Cumulative
(Unaudited) Since Filing
=============================================================
Balance, Filing Date......................... $ 2,366.0
Cash disbursements and/or reclassifications
under Bankruptcy Court orders:
Freight and distribution order......... (5.7)
Trade accounts payable order........... (9.1)
Other court orders including employee
wages and benefits, sales and use
tax, and customer programs.......... (206.8)
Expense/(income) items:
Interest on pre-petition debt............. 52.1
Employee-related accruals................. 12.5
Change in estimate of asbestos-related
property damage contingencies........... 30.0
Change in estimate of environmental
contingencies........................... 219.0
Change in estimate of income tax
contingencies........................... 15.2
Balance sheet reclassifications........... (25.7)
-------------
Balance, end of period....................... $ 2,447.5
=============================================================
Additional liabilities subject to compromise may arise due to the rejection of
executory contracts or unexpired leases, or as a result of the allowance of
contingent or disputed claims.
I-11
The Debtors' Chapter 11 expenses for the three-month and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2004 and 2003 consist of:
=======================================================================
THREE MONTHS
ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
(In millions) JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
=======================================================================
2004 2003 2004 2003
-----------------------------------------
Legal and financial
advisory fees ........ $ 3.3 $ 6.9 $ 8.1 $ 9.7
Interest income ........ (0.3) (0.1) (0.6) (0.2)
-----------------------------------------
Chapter 11 expenses, net $ 3.0 $ 6.8 $ 7.5 $ 9.5
=======================================================================
Pursuant to SOP 90-7, interest income earned on the Debtors' cash balances must
be offset against Chapter 11 expenses.
Condensed financial information of the Debtors is presented below:
===============================================================
W. R. GRACE & CO. - CHAPTER 11
FILING ENTITIES
DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS SIX MONTHS ENDED
(In millions) (Unaudited) JUNE 30,
==============================================================
2004 2003
--------------------------
Net sales, including intercompany $ 565.2 $ 478.1
--------------------------
Cost of goods sold, including
intercompany, exclusive of
depreciation and amortization
shown separately below....... 400.0 330.5
Selling, general and
administrative expenses,
exclusive of net pension
expense shown separately below 129.6 113.0
Research and development
expenses.................... 17.4 21.7
Depreciation and amortization... 28.4 31.4
Net pension expense............. 24.7 24.3
Interest expense and related
financing costs.............. 7.5 8.2
Other income.................... (9.7) (30.8)
Provision for environmental
remediation................... -- 2.5
--------------------------
597.9 500.8
--------------------------
Loss before Chapter 11 expenses,
income taxes, and equity in
net income of non-filing
entities..................... (32.7) (22.7)
Chapter 11 expenses, net........ (7.5) (9.5)
Provision for income taxes...... (2.9) (0.1)
--------------------------
Loss before equity in net income
of non-filing entities........ (43.1) (32.3)
Equity in net income of
non-filing entities........... 80.2 36.5
--------------------------
NET INCOME ..................... $ 37.1 $ 4.2
==============================================================
===============================================================
W. R. GRACE & CO. - CHAPTER 11 FILING
ENTITIES DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS SIX MONTHS ENDED
(In millions) (Unaudited) JUNE 30,
===============================================================
2004 2003
------------------------
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Loss before Chapter 11 expenses,
income taxes, and equity in net
income of non-filing entities..... $ (32.7) $ (22.7)
Reconciliation to net cash provided
by (used for) operating activities:
Non-cash items, net.............. 31.3 34.5
Contributions to defined
benefit pension plans.......... (2.2) (2.1)
Changes in other assets and
liabilities, excluding the
effect of businesses
acquired/divested.............. (12.0) (17.6)
------------------------
NET CASH USED FOR OPERATING ACTIVITIES (15.6) (7.9)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED FOR)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES............. 101.0 (1) (35.5)
NET CASH (USED FOR) PROVIDED BY
FINANCING ACTIVITIES............. (3.7) 25.6
------------------------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS................. 81.7 (17.8)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning
of period........................ 120.5 56.8
------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of
period........................... $ 202.2 $ 39.0
===============================================================
(1) Includes $84.4 million of principal payments on a loan from the Debtors to
a Grace subsidiary in Germany. (See Note 5.)
===============================================================
W. R. GRACE & CO. -
CHAPTER 11 FILING ENTITIES
DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION
BALANCE SHEETS JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
(In millions) (Unaudited) 2004 2003
===============================================================
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents .... $ 202.2 $ 120.5
Accounts and other
receivables, net .......... 125.6 105.6
Receivables from non-filing
entities, net.............. 43.4 46.2
Inventories................... 78.6 81.2
Other current assets.......... 42.0 47.9
--------------------------
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS.......... 491.8 401.4
Properties and equipment, net. 366.8 383.9
Cash value of life insurance
policies, net of policy
loans...................... 96.6 90.8
Deferred income taxes ........ 613.3 587.9
Asbestos-related insurance
expected to be realized
after one year............. 264.0 269.4
Loans receivable from
non-filing entities, net... 357.1 448.0
Investment in non-filing
entities...................... 386.6 303.6
Other assets.................. 96.5 92.7
----------------------------
TOTAL ASSETS.................. $2,672.7 $2,577.7
===============================================================
I-12
============================================================
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
(In millions) (Unaudited) 2004 2003
============================================================
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
LIABILITIES NOT SUBJECT TO
COMPROMISE
Current liabilities........ $ 123.4 $ 98.0
Other liabilities.......... 270.9 191.2
------------------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES NOT
SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE.... 394.3 289.2
LIABILITIES SUBJECT TO
COMPROMISE............... 2,447.5 2,452.3
------------------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES.......... 2,841.8 2,741.5
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DEFICIT) ............... (169.1) (163.8)
------------------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY (DEFICIT) ........ $ 2,672.7 $ 2,577.7
============================================================
In addition to Grace's financial reporting obligations as prescribed by the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Debtors are also required, under
the rules and regulations of the Bankruptcy Code, to periodically file certain
statements and schedules and a monthly operating report with the Bankruptcy
Court. This information is available to the public through the Bankruptcy Court.
This information is prepared in a format that may not be comparable to
information in Grace's quarterly and annual financial statements as filed with
the SEC. The monthly operating reports are not audited, do not purport to
represent the financial position or results of operations of Grace on a
consolidated basis, and should not be relied on for such purposes.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. ASBESTOS-RELATED LITIGATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grace is a defendant in property damage and bodily injury lawsuits relating to
previously sold asbestos-containing products. As of the Filing Date, Grace was a
defendant in 65,656 asbestos-related lawsuits, 17 involving claims for property
damage (one of which has since been dismissed), and the remainder involving
129,191 claims for bodily injury. Due to the Filing, holders of asbestos-related
claims are stayed from continuing to prosecute pending litigation and from
commencing new lawsuits against the Debtors. Additional asbestos-related claims
will be subject to the Chapter 11 process established by the Bankruptcy Court.
Separate creditors' committees representing the interests of property damage and
bodily injury claimants, and a legal representative of future bodily injury
claimants, have been appointed in the Chapter 11 Cases. Grace's obligations with
respect to present and future claims will be determined through the Chapter 11
process.
PROPERTY DAMAGE LITIGATION
The plaintiffs in asbestos property damage lawsuits generally seek to have the
defendants absorb the cost of removing, containing or repairing the
asbestos-containing materials in the affected buildings. Each property damage
case is unique in that the age, type, size and use of the building, and the
difficulty of asbestos abatement, if necessary, vary from structure to
structure. Information regarding product identification, the amount of product
in the building, the age, type, size and use of the building, the legal status
of the claimant, the jurisdictional history of prior cases and the court in
which the case is pending has provided meaningful guidance as to the range of
potential costs. Grace has recorded a liability for all outstanding property
damage claims for which sufficient information is available to form a reasonable
estimate of the cost to resolve such claims.
Out of 380 asbestos property damage cases filed prior to the Filing Date, 141
were dismissed without payment of any damages or settlement amounts; judgments
were entered in favor of Grace in nine cases (excluding cases settled following
appeals of judgments in favor of Grace); judgments were entered in favor of the
plaintiffs in eight cases (one of which is on appeal) for a total of $86.1
million; 207 property damage cases were settled for a total of $696.8 million;
and 16 cases remain outstanding (including the one on appeal). Of the 16
remaining cases, eight relate to ZAI and eight relate to a number of former
asbestos-containing products (two of which also involve ZAI).
Approximately 4,000 additional property damage claims were filed prior to the
March 31, 2003 claims bar date established by the Bankruptcy Court. Such claims
were reviewed in detail by Grace, categorized into claims with sufficient
information to be evaluated or claims that require additional information and,
where sufficient information existed, the cost of resolution was estimated.
(Approximately 170 claims contained insufficient information to permit an
evaluation.) As a result of such review, and after considering the factors
described above, Grace recorded a $30.0 million liability in the fourth quarter
of 2003 as its estimated cost of resolving such additional claims.
I-13
The ZAI cases were filed as class action lawsuits in 2000 and 2001 on behalf of
owners of homes containing ZAI. These cases seek damages and equitable relief,
including the removal, replacement and/or disposal of all such insulation. The
plaintiffs assert that this product is in millions of homes throughout the U.S.
and that the cost of removal could be several thousand dollars per home. As a
result of the Filing, these cases have been transferred to the Bankruptcy Court.
Based on Grace's investigation of the claims described in these lawsuits, and
testing and analysis of this product by Grace and others, Grace believes that
the product was and continues to be safe for its intended purpose and poses
little or no threat to human health. In July 2002, the Bankruptcy Court approved
special counsel to represent, at the Debtors' expense, the ZAI claimants in a
proceeding to determine certain threshold scientific issues regarding ZAI. The
parties have completed discovery with respect to these threshold issues and have
filed motions asking the Bankruptcy Court to resolve a number of important legal
and factual issues regarding the ZAI claims. The Bankruptcy Court has
established October 18 and 19, 2004 as the dates for oral arguments of pending
motions.
BODILY INJURY LITIGATION
Asbestos bodily injury claims are generally similar to each other (differing
primarily in the type of asbestos-related illness allegedly suffered by the
plaintiff). However, Grace's estimated liability for such claims has been
influenced by numerous variables, including the solvency of other former
producers of asbestos containing products, cross-claims by co-defendants, the
rate at which new claims are filed, the jurisdiction in which the claims are
filed, and the defense and disposition costs associated with these claims.
Grace's bodily injury liability reflects management's estimate, as of the Filing
Date (adjusted for post-Filing defense and claims administration costs), of the
number and ultimate cost of present and future bodily injury claims expected to
be asserted against Grace given demographic assumptions of possible exposure to
asbestos containing products previously manufactured by Grace.
Cumulatively through the Filing Date, 16,354 asbestos bodily injury lawsuits
involving approximately 35,720 claims were dismissed without payment of any
damages or settlement amounts (primarily on the basis that Grace products were
not involved) and approximately 55,489 lawsuits involving approximately 163,698
claims were disposed of (through settlement and judgments) for a total of $645.6
million.
Approximately 1,000 claims for medical monitoring were filed against the Debtors
prior to the bar date. These claims were made by individuals for medical
monitoring, but not bodily injury, due to exposure to asbestos through Grace's
products or operations. Based on the number and expected value of such claims,
Grace does not believe such claims will have a material effect on the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
ASBESTOS-RELATED LIABILITY
The total asbestos-related liability balances as of June 30, 2004 and December
31, 2003 were $988.4 million and $992.3 million, respectively. The decrease in
the liability is due to the payment of ongoing post-Filing administrative costs
relating to claims management and defense costs permitted by the Bankruptcy
Court. The recorded liability is included in "liabilities subject to
compromise."
The liability covers indemnity and defense costs for pending and projected
future bodily injury claims as of the Filing Date, and pending property damage
claims for which sufficient information was available to evaluate and estimate
probable resolution costs, including the new property damage claims submitted
prior to the March 31, 2003 bar date. Since the Filing, Grace is aware that
bodily injury claims have been filed against co-defendant companies at higher
than historical rates, and that the cost incurred by such companies to resolve
asbestos-related cancer claims has increased. Grace believes that had it not
filed for Chapter 11 reorganization, it likely would have received thousands
more claims than it had previously projected, and that the cost to resolve
asbestos-related cancer claims would have been higher than projected. Grace is
in the process of reevaluating its asbestos-related liability as part of its
efforts to prepare a plan of reorganization. It will adjust its recorded
liability based on this reevaluation and any developments in the Chapter 11
Cases. Accordingly, the actual amount of Grace's asbestos-related liability
could differ materially from the recorded liability.
Recently, federal legislation has been proposed to address asbestos-related
bodily injury litigation. In addition, several states have enacted or proposed
legislation affecting asbestos-related bodily injury litigation. At this time,
Grace cannot predict what impact any such legislation would have on Grace's
I-14
asbestos-related bodily injury liability or its ultimate plan of reorganization.
ASBESTOS INSURANCE
Grace previously purchased insurance policies with respect to its
asbestos-related lawsuits and claims. Insurance coverage for asbestos-related
liabilities has not been commercially available since 1985. Grace has settled
with and has been paid by all of its primary insurance carriers with respect to
both property damage and bodily injury cases and claims. Grace has also settled
with its excess insurance carriers that wrote policies available for property
damage cases; those settlements involve amounts paid and to be paid to Grace.
Grace believes that certain of these settlements may cover ZAI claims, as well
as other property damage claims. In addition, Grace believes that additional
coverage for ZAI claims may exist under excess insurance policies not subject to
settlement agreements. Grace has settled with excess insurance carriers that
wrote policies available for bodily injury claims in layers of insurance that
Grace believes may be reached based on its current estimates.
The asbestos-related insurance asset represents amounts expected to be received
from carriers under settlement agreements for defense and disposition costs to
be paid by Grace. Such estimated insurance reimbursements are based on the
recorded amount of the asbestos-related liability and are only collectible as
liabilities are satisfied. In the event that Grace's ultimate asbestos-related
liability is determined to exceed recorded amounts, insurance exists to cover a
portion of such incremental liability, but generally in a lower proportion than
the currently recorded insurance receivable bears to the currently recorded
liability.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. ACQUISITIONS AND JOINT VENTURES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In April 2003, Grace, through its subsidiary The Separations Group, acquired the
business and assets of MODcol Corporation, a manufacturer of preparative
chromatography columns and provider of custom column packaging services, for a
total cash cost of $2.2 million, net of cash acquired. Goodwill of $0.6 million
was recognized in the transaction, and was assigned to Davison Chemicals.
On August 2, 2004, Grace acquired the stock of Alltech International Holdings,
Inc., a global manufacturer and supplier of chromatography products, with 2003
annual sales of approximately $46 million. This acquisition will be integrated
into the Davison Chemicals specialty materials product group.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Components of other expense (income) are as follows:
================================================================================
OTHER EXPENSE THREE MONTHS SIX MONTHS
(INCOME) ENDED ENDED
(In millions) JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
================================================================================
2004 2003 2004 2003
---------------------------------------
Investment income ...................... $ (0.7) $ (1.2) $ (2.2) $ (4.3)
Interest income ........................ (1.4) (1.3) (2.3) (2.5)
Net loss on sale of investments and
disposals of assets ................. 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.9
Tolling revenue ........................ (0.2) (0.2) (0.5) (0.7)
Translation effects - intercompany loan (0.5) -- 1.1 --
Value of currency hedges ............... 9.3 -- 9.3 --
Foreign currency transaction effects ... (0.4) 2.0 (0.6) 3.3
Other miscellaneous income ............ (1.6) (2.0) (3.7) (4.6)
---------------------------------------
Total other expense (income)............ $ 4.6 $ (2.1) $ 1.4 $ (7.9)
================================================================================
In March 2004, Grace began accounting for currency fluctuations on a (euro)293
million intercompany loan between Grace's subsidiaries in the United States and
Germany as a component of operating results instead of as a component of other
comprehensive income. The change was prompted by new tax laws in Germany and
Grace's cash flow planning for its Chapter 11 reorganization, which indicated
that it is no longer reasonable to consider this loan as part of the permanent
capital structure in Germany. The effect of the change in exchange rates related
to this loan for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2004 was $0.5
million favorable and $1.1 million unfavorable, respectively.
In May 2004, Grace entered into a series of foreign currency hedge agreements to
mitigate future operating statement fluctuations on the remaining loan balance.
These hedge agreements have varying rates that coincide with loan repayments due
periodically through June 2005. In 2004, (euro)70 million of loan principal was
repaid. For the six months ended June 2004, a $9.3 million hedge loss was
recognized, in addition to a $1.1 million foreign currency loss, and reported in
other expense (income).
I-15
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. OTHER BALANCE SHEET ACCOUNTS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=====================================================================================
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
(In millions) 2004 2003
=====================================================================================
ACCOUNTS AND OTHER RECEIVABLES, NET
Trade receivables, less allowance of $4.7 (2003 - $4.6) ..... $ 384.3 $ 331.5
Other receivables, less allowances of $1.7 (2003 - $1.7) .... 16.5 16.0
-----------------------
$ 400.8 $ 347.5
=====================================================================================
INVENTORIES
Raw materials ............................................... $ 54.3 $ 53.5
In process .................................................. 36.2 35.8
Finished products ........................................... 140.8 134.0
General merchandise ......................................... 29.6 29.4
Less: Adjustment of certain inventories to a
last-in/first-out (LIFO) basis ............................ (36.6) (38.1)
-----------------------
$ 224.3 $ 214.6
=====================================================================================
OTHER ASSETS
Deferred pension costs ...................................... $ 119.3 $ 115.9
Deferred charges ............................................ 46.7 45.7
Long-term receivables, less allowances of $0.7 (2003 - $0.7) 9.0 9.2
Patents, licenses and other intangible assets, net .......... 61.2 65.1
Pension-unamortized prior service cost ...................... 20.7 19.8
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates and other .......... 0.4 0.5
-----------------------
$ 257.3 $ 256.2
=====================================================================================
OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accrued compensation ........................................ $ 46.0 $ 48.5
Deferred tax liability ...................................... 0.3 0.5
Customer volume rebates ..................................... 19.6 28.1
Accrued commissions ......................................... 8.1 9.8
Accrued reorganization fees ................................. 8.2 6.9
Other accrued liabilities ................................... 63.2 35.4
-----------------------
$ 145.4 $ 129.2
=====================================================================================
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. LIFE INSURANCE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grace is the beneficiary of life insurance policies on certain current and
former employees with a net cash surrender value of $96.6 million and $90.8
million at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The policies were
acquired to fund various employee benefit programs and other long-term
liabilities and are structured to provide cash flow (primarily tax-free) over an
extended number of years.
The following table summarizes activity in these policies for the six months
ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and components of the net cash value at June 30,
2004 and December 31, 2003:
=============================================================
LIFE INSURANCE -
ACTIVITY SUMMARY SIX MONTHS ENDED
(In millions) JUNE 30,
=============================================================
2004 2003
--------------------------
Earnings on policy assets ....... $ 17.2 $ 21.3
Interest on policy loans ........ (15.0) (17.0)
Premiums ........................ -- --
Policy loan repayments .......... 2.7 1.4
Net investing activity .......... 0.9 3.7
--------------------------
Change in net cash value ........ $ 5.8 $ 9.4
=============================================================
Tax-free proceeds received ...... $ 10.5 $ 5.4
=============================================================
COMPONENTS OF JUNE 30, December 31,
NET CASH VALUE 2004 2003
=============================================================
Gross cash value ............. $ 471.7 $ 478.5
Principal - policy loans ..... (368.2) (365.3)
Accrued interest - policy
loans ...................... (6.9) (22.4)
--------------------------
Net cash value ............... $ 96.6 $ 90.8
=============================================================
Insurance benefits in force .. $2,192.9 $2,213.1
=============================================================
Grace's financial statements display income statement activity and balance sheet
amounts on a net basis, reflecting the contractual interdependency of policy
assets and liabilities. As discussed in Note 12, Grace has reached a tentative
agreement with the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") to settle tax
contingencies with respect to certain of these life insurance policies and, as
part of that agreement, to terminate such policies. If termination had occurred
with respect to such policies as of June 30, 2004, Grace would have received
approximately $22 million in net cash value (gross cash value would have been
reduced by approximately $374 million and policy loans of approximately $352
million would have been satisfied). In addition, Grace's insurance benefits in
force would have been reduced by approximately $2,004 million to approximately
$189 million.
I-16
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. DEBT
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
===========================================================
COMPONENTS OF DEBT JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
(In millions) 2004 2003
===========================================================
DEBT PAYABLE WITHIN ONE YEAR
DIP facility.................. $ -- $ --
Other short-term borrowings .. 13.0 6.8
--------------------------
$ 13.0 $ 6.8
==========================
DEBT PAYABLE AFTER ONE YEAR
DIP facility ................. $ -- $ --
DEBT SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE
Bank borrowings............... $ 500.0 $ 500.0
Other borrowings.............. 2.8 3.7
Accrued interest.............. 54.4 49.0
--------------------------
$ 557.2 $ 552.7
==========================
Annualized weighted average
interest rates on total debt 2.0% 2.1%
===========================================================
In April 2001, the Debtors entered into the DIP facility for a two-year term in
the aggregate amount of $250 million. The DIP facility is secured by a priority
lien on substantially all assets of the Debtors, and bears interest based on
LIBOR. The Debtors have extended the term of the DIP facility through April 1,
2006. Grace had no outstanding borrowings under the DIP facility as of June 30,
2004; however, $26.3 million of standby letters of credit were issued and
outstanding under the facility. The letters of credit, which reduce available
funds under the facility, were issued mainly for trade-related matters such as
performance bonds, and certain insurance and environmental matters. (See Note 12
for additional information on Grace's financial assurances.)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Company is authorized to issue 300,000,000 shares of common stock. Of the
common stock unissued on June 30, 2004, approximately 8,716,666 shares were
reserved for issuance pursuant to stock option and other stock incentive plans.
In the first six months of 2004 and the year ended December 31, 2003, Grace did
not grant any stock options.
For additional information, see Notes 15 and 17 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in Grace's 2003 Form 10-K.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. EARNINGS PER SHARE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following table shows a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators
used in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share.
=============================================================================================
EARNINGS
PER SHARE THREE MONTHS SIX MONTHS
(In millions, except per ENDED ENDED
share amounts) JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
=============================================================================================
2004 2003 2004 2003
NUMERATORS
Net income ......................................... $ 21.3 $ 6.5 $ 37.1 $ 4.2
=====================================
DENOMINATORS
Weighted average common shares - basic calculation . 65.6 65.5 65.6 65.5
Dilutive effect of employee stock options .......... 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1
-------------------------------------
Weighted average common shares diluted calculation . 65.8 65.6 65.8 65.6
=====================================
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE ............................ $ 0.32 0.10 $ 0.57 $ 0.06
=====================================
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE ........................... $ 0.32 $ 0.10 $ 0.56 $ 0.06
=============================================================================================
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11. COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The table below presents the pre-tax, tax and after tax amounts of Grace's other
comprehensive (loss) income for the three months and six months ended June 30,
2004 and 2003:
==========================================================================
THREE MONTHS ENDED AFTER-
JUNE 30, 2004 PRE-TAX TAX TAX
(In millions) AMOUNT BENEFIT AMOUNT
==========================================================================
Minimum pension liability .............. $ (54.3) $ 19.0 $ (35.3)
Foreign currency translation adjustments (2.5) -- (2.5)
------------------------------
Other comprehensive loss ............... $ (56.8) $ 19.0 $ (37.8)
=========================================================================
SIX MONTHS ENDED AFTER-
JUNE 30, 2004 PRE-TAX TAX TAX
(In millions) AMOUNT BENEFIT AMOUNT
=========================================================================
Minimum pension liability .............. $ (54.3) $ 19.0 $ (35.3)
Foreign currency translation adjustments (7.5) -- (7.5)
------------------------------
Other comprehensive loss ............... $ (61.8) $ 19.0 $ (42.8)
=========================================================================
=========================================================================
THREE MONTHS ENDED AFTER-
JUNE 30, 2003 PRE-TAX TAX TAX
(In millions) AMOUNT BENEFIT AMOUNT
=========================================================================
Foreign currency translation adjustments $ 40.0 $ -- $ 40.0
------------------------------
Other comprehensive income ............. $ 40.0 $ -- $ 40.0
=========================================================================
SIX MONTHS ENDED AFTER-
JUNE 30, 2004 PRE-TAX TAX TAX
(In millions) AMOUNT BENEFIT AMOUNT
=========================================================================
Foreign currency translation adjustments $ 49.4 $ -- $ 49.4
------------------------------
Other comprehensive income ............. $ 49.4 $ -- $ 49.4
=========================================================================
I-17
The table below presents the components of Grace's accumulated other
comprehensive loss at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003:
=================================================================
COMPONENTS OF ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
(In millions) 2004 2003
=================================================================
Minimum pension liability ........... (300.7) (265.4)
Foreign currency .................... $ (32.0) $ (24.5)
translation
-------------------------
Accumulated other comprehensive loss. $ (332.7) $ (289.9)
=================================================================
Grace is a global enterprise, which operates in over 40 countries with local
currency generally deemed to be the functional currency for accounting purposes.
The foreign currency translation amount represents the adjustment necessary to
translate the balance sheets valued in local currencies to the U.S. dollar as of
the end of each period presented. The change in foreign currency translation at
June 30, 2004 compared with December 31, 2003 is due to the strengthening of the
U.S. dollar against most other reporting currencies.
During the second quarter, Grace completed an experience study of the
assumptions and data that underlie its liability measurement for its U.S.
qualified defined benefit pension plans. Based on that study, the accumulated
benefit obligation of such plans as of the December 31, 2003 measurement date
was increased by $54.3 million (approximately 7% of the aggregate liability),
mainly due to longer estimated life spans. This change has been accounted for
within Grace's balance sheet as an increase to the recorded minimum pension
liability and the accumulated comprehensive loss account (net of tax effects)
reflected in shareholders' equity (deficit).
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASBESTOS-RELATED LITIGATION - SEE NOTE 3
ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION
General Matters and Discussion
Grace is subject to loss contingencies resulting from extensive and evolving
federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations relating to
the generation, storage, handling, discharge and disposition of hazardous wastes
and other materials. Grace accrues for anticipated costs associated with
investigative and remediation efforts where an assessment has indicated that a
probable liability has been incurred and the cost can be reasonably estimated.
These accruals do not take into account any discounting for the time value of
money.
Grace's environmental liabilities are reassessed whenever circumstances become
better defined or remediation efforts and their costs can be better estimated.
These liabilities are evaluated based on currently available information,
including the progress of remedial investigation at each site, the current
status of discussions with regulatory authorities regarding the method and
extent of remediation at each site, existing technology, prior experience in
contaminated site remediation and the apportionment of costs among potentially
responsible parties. Grace expects that the funding of environmental remediation
activities will be affected by the Chapter 11 proceedings; any such effect could
be material. Grace's environmental liabilities are included in "liabilities
subject to compromise" as of June 30, 2004.
At June 30, 2004, Grace's estimated liability for environmental investigative
and remediation costs totaled $329.5 million, compared with $332.4 million at
December 31, 2003. This liability covers both vermiculite and non-vermiculite
related matters. The amount is based on funding and/or remediation agreements in
place and Grace's best estimate of the cost to remediate sites not subject to a
formal remediation plan.
Grace's net expenditures charged against previously established reserves for the
six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were $2.9 million and $6.0 million,
respectively.
Vermiculite Related Matters
From the 1920's until 1990, Grace and previous owners conducted vermiculite
mining and related activities near Libby, Montana. The vermiculite ore that was
mined contained varying amounts of asbestos as a contaminant, almost all of
which was removed during processing. Expanded vermiculite from Libby was used in
products such as fireproofing, insulation and potting soil. In November 1999,
Region 8 of the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") began an investigation
into alleged excessive levels of asbestos-related disease in the Libby
population related to these former mining activities. This investigation led the
EPA to undertake additional investigative activity and to carry out response
actions in and around Libby. On March 30, 2001, the EPA filed a lawsuit in U.S.
District Court for the District of Montana, Missoula Division (United States v.
W. R. Grace & Company et al.) under the Comprehensive Environmental
I-18
Response, Compensation and Liability Act for the recovery of costs allegedly
incurred by the United States in response to the release or threatened release
of asbestos in the Libby, Montana area relating to such former mining
activities. These costs include cleaning and/or demolition of contaminated
buildings, the excavation and removal of contaminated soil, health screening of
Libby residents and former mine workers, and investigation and monitoring costs.
In this action, the EPA also sought a declaration of Grace's liability that
would be binding in future actions to recover further response costs.
In connection with its defense, Grace conducted its own investigation to
determine whether the EPA's actions and cost claims were justified and
reasonable. However, in December 2002, the District Court granted the United
States' motion for partial summary judgment on a number of issues that limited
Grace's ability to challenge the EPA's response actions. In January 2003, a
trial was held on the remainder of the issues, which primarily involved the
reasonableness and adequacy of documentation of the EPA's cost recovery claims
through December 31, 2001. On August 28, 2003, the District Court issued a
ruling in favor of the United States that requires Grace to reimburse the
government for $54.5 million in costs expended through December 2001, and for
all appropriate future costs to complete the clean-up. Grace has appealed the
court's ruling to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The appeal is expected to be
heard by the appellate court during the fourth quarter of 2004.
As a result of such ruling and Grace's analysis of estimated remediation costs
at vermiculite processing sites currently or formerly operated by Grace, Grace
estimates its total liability for vermiculite-related matters to be $187.0
million at June 30, 2004. Grace's estimate of expected costs is based on public
comments regarding the EPA's spending plans, discussions of spending forecasts
with EPA representatives, and analysis of other information made available from
the EPA. The EPA's cost estimates have changed several times and increased
substantially over time. Consequently, Grace's estimate may change materially as
more information becomes available. Grace's liability for this matter is
included in "liabilities subject to compromise."
Non-Vermiculite Related Matters
At June 30, 2004, Grace's estimated liability for remediation of sites not
related to its former vermiculite mining and processing activities, which
includes approximately 20 owned and 50 non-owned sites, was $142.5 million. This
liability relates to Grace's current and former operations, including its share
of liability for off-site disposal at facilities where it has been identified as
a potentially responsible party. This liability also reflects Grace's evaluation
of environmental-related claims submitted as part of the Chapter 11 process for
which sufficient information was available. As Grace receives new information
and continues its claims evaluation process, its estimated liability may change
materially. Grace's liability for this matter is included in "liabilities
subject to compromise."
Insurance Matters
Grace is a party to three environmental insurance coverage actions involving one
primary and one excess insurance carrier regarding the applicability of the
carriers' policies to Grace's environmental remediation costs. The outcome of
such litigation, as well as the amounts of any recoveries that Grace may
receive, is presently uncertain. Accordingly, Grace has not recorded a
receivable with respect to such insurance coverage.
TAX MATTERS
Grace has received the examination report from the IRS for tax periods 1993
through 1996 asserting, in the aggregate, approximately $114 million of proposed
tax adjustments, plus accrued interest. The most significant contested issue
addressed in such report concerns corporate-owned life insurance ("COLI")
policies and is discussed below. Other proposed IRS tax adjustments include
Grace's tax position regarding research and development credits, the reporting
of certain divestitures and other miscellaneous proposed adjustments. The tax
audit for the 1993 through 1996 tax period was under the jurisdiction of the IRS
Office of Appeals, where Grace filed a protest. The IRS Office of Appeals has
returned the audit to the examination team for further review of the proposed
adjustments as well as several affirmative tax claims raised by Grace. Grace's
federal tax returns covering periods 1997 and forward are either under
examination by the IRS or open for future examination. As a consequence of any
finally determined federal tax adjustments, Grace will be liable for additional
state taxes plus interest accrued thereon. Grace believes that the impact of
probable tax return adjustments are adequately recognized as liabilities at June
30, 2004. Any cash payment as a result of such adjustment would be subject to
Grace's Chapter 11 proceedings.
I-19
In 1988 and 1990, Grace acquired COLI policies on the lives of certain of its
employees as part of a strategy to fund the cost of postretirement employee
health care benefits and other long-term liabilities. COLI premiums have been
funded in part by loans issued against the cash surrender value of the COLI
policies. The IRS is challenging deductions of interest on loans secured by COLI
policies for years prior to 1999. In 2000, Grace paid $21.2 million of tax and
interest related to this issue for tax years 1990 through 1992. Subsequent to
1992, Grace deducted approximately $163.2 million in interest attributable to
COLI policy loans. Although Grace continues to believe that the deductions were
legitimate, the IRS has successfully challenged interest deductions claimed by
other corporations with respect to broad-based COLI policies in three out of
four litigated cases. Given the level of IRS success in COLI cases, Grace
requested and was granted early referral to the IRS Office of Appeals for
consideration of possible settlement alternatives of the COLI interest deduction
issue.
On September 23, 2002, Grace filed a motion in its Chapter 11 proceeding
requesting that the Bankruptcy Court authorize Grace to enter into a settlement
agreement with the IRS with respect to Grace's COLI interest deductions. The tax
years at issue are 1989 through 1998. Under the terms of the proposed
settlement, the government would allow 20% of the aggregate amount of the COLI
interest deductions and Grace would owe federal income tax and interest on the
remaining 80%. Grace has accrued for the potential tax and interest liability
related to the disallowance of all COLI interest deductions and continues to
accrue interest. On October 22, 2002, the Bankruptcy Court issued an order
authorizing Grace to enter into settlement discussions with the IRS consistent
with the aforementioned terms and further ordered that any final agreement would
be subject to Bankruptcy Court approval. Grace has reached a tentative agreement
with the IRS to (a) settle the COLI dispute consistent with the proposed
settlement terms described above, and (b) terminate the COLI policies, and, by
agreement, recognize 20% of any gain as taxable income. Grace will file a motion
with the Bankruptcy Court for authorization to execute a final agreement.
The IRS has assessed additional federal income tax withholding and Federal
Insurance Contributions Act taxes plus interest and related penalties for
calendar years 1993 through 1995 against a Grace subsidiary that formerly
operated a temporary staffing business for nurses and other health care
personnel. The assessments, aggregating $21.8 million, were made in connection
with a meal and incidental expense per diem plan for traveling health care
personnel that was in effect through 1999, the year in which Grace sold the
business. The IRS contends that certain per diem reimbursements should have been
treated as wages subject to employment taxes and federal income tax withholding.
Grace contends that its per diem and expense allowance plans were in accordance
with statutory and regulatory requirements, as well as other published guidance
from the IRS. The IRS has issued additional assessments aggregating $40.1
million for the 1996 through 1998 tax periods. The statute of limitations has
expired with respect to the 1999 tax year. Grace has a right to indemnification
for approximately 36% of any tax liability (including interest thereon) for the
period from July, 1996 through December, 1998 from its former partner in the
business. The matter is currently pending in the United States Court of Claims.
Grace is currently in discussions with the Department of Justice and the IRS
concerning possible settlement options with respect to the aggregate $61.9
million assessment. Grace expects this matter to be resolved at an amount that
would not have a significant adverse impact on its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
PURCHASE COMMITMENTS
From time to time, Grace engages in purchase commitments in its various business
activities, all of which are expected to be fulfilled with no material adverse
consequences to Grace's operations or financial position.
GUARANTEES AND INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS
Grace is a party to many contracts containing guarantees and indemnification
obligations. These contracts primarily consist of:
o Contracts providing for the sale of a former business unit or product line
in which Grace has agreed to indemnify the buyer against liabilities
arising prior to the closing of the transaction, including environmental
liabilities. These liabilities are included in "liabilities subject to
compromise" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets;
o Guarantees of real property lease obligations of third parties, typically
arising out of (a) leases entered into by former subsidiaries of Grace, or
(b) the assignment or sublease of a lease by Grace to a third party. These
obligations are included in
I-20
"liabilities subject to compromise" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets;
o Licenses of intellectual property by Grace to third parties in which Grace
has agreed to indemnify the licensee against third party infringement
claims;
o Contracts entered into with third party consultants, independent
contractors, and other service providers in which Grace has agreed to
indemnify such parties against certain liabilities in connection with their
performance. Based on historical experience and the likelihood that such
parties will ever make a claim against Grace, such indemnification
obligations are immaterial; and
o Product warranties with respect to certain products sold to customers in
the ordinary course of business. These warranties typically provide that
product will conform to specifications. Grace generally does not establish
a liability for product warranty based on a percentage of sales or other
formula. Grace accrues a warranty liability on a transaction-specific basis
depending on the individual facts and circumstances related to each sale.
Both the liability and annual expense related to product warranties are
immaterial to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
At June 30, 2004, Grace had gross financial assurances issued and outstanding of
$251.3 million, comprised of $136.8 million of gross surety bonds issued by
various insurance companies and $114.5 million of standby letters of credit and
other financial assurances issued by various banks. Of the standby letters of
credit, $18.8 million act as collateral for surety bonds, thereby reducing
Grace's overall obligations under its financial assurances to a net amount of
$232.5 million. These financial assurances were established for a variety of
purposes, including insurance and environmental matters, asbestos settlements
and appeals, trade-related commitments and other matters. Of the net amount of
$232.5 million of financial assurances, approximately $10.6 million were issued
by non-Debtor entities and $221.9 million were issued by the Debtors. Of the
amounts issued by the Debtors, approximately $191.1 million were issued before
the Filing Date, with the remaining $30.8 million being subsequent to the
Filing, of which $26.3 million was issued under the DIP facility.
ACCOUNTING FOR CONTINGENCIES
Although the outcome of each of the matters discussed above cannot be predicted
with certainty, Grace has assessed its risk and has made accounting estimates as
required under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. As a result of the
Filing, claims related to certain of the items discussed above will be addressed
as part of Grace's Chapter 11 proceedings. Accruals recorded for such
contingencies have been included in "liabilities subject to compromise" on the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amounts of these liabilities as
ultimately determined through the Chapter 11 proceedings could be materially
different from amounts recorded by Grace at June 30, 2004.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13. PENSION PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grace maintains defined benefit pension plans covering employees of certain
units who meet age and service requirements. Benefits are generally based on
final average salary and years of service. Grace funds its U.S. pension plans in
accordance with U.S. federal laws and regulations. Non-U.S. pension plans are
funded under a variety of methods, as required under local laws and customs.
Grace also provides, through nonqualified plans, supplemental pension benefits
in excess of qualified plan limits imposed by federal tax law. These plans cover
officers and certain key employees and serve to increase the combined pension
amount to the level that they otherwise would have received under the qualified
plans in the absence of such limits. The unqualified plans are unfunded and
Grace pays the costs of benefits as they are incurred.
Grace provides postretirement health care and life insurance benefits (referred
to as other post-employment benefits or "OPEB") for retired employees of certain
U.S. business units and certain divested units. The postretirement medical plan
provides various levels of benefits to employees hired before 1991 and who
retire from Grace after age 55 with at least 10 years of service. These plans
are unfunded, and Grace pays a portion of the costs of benefits under these
plans as they are incurred. Grace applies SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting
for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions," which requires that the future
costs of postretirement health care and life insurance benefits be accrued over
the employees' years of service.
I-21
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows:
========================================================================
COMPONENTS OF NET
PERIODIC BENEFIT
COST THREE MONTHS ENDED
(In millions) JUNE 30,
========================================================================
2004 2003
---------------------------------
PENSION OPEB Pension OPEB
---------------------------------
Service cost ........................ $ 4.1 $ 0.1 $ 2.5 $ 0.2
Interest cost ....................... 15.8 1.8 14.1 2.2
Expected return on plan assets ...... (12.5) -- (11.0) --
Amortization of prior service cost .. 1.3 (3.1) 1.4 (3.2)
Amortization of unrecognized
actuarial loss ..................... 4.2 0.7 4.7 1.0
--------------------------------
NET U.S. PERIODIC BENEFIT COST ...... 12.9 (0.5) 11.7 0.2
Foreign and other ................... 2.0 -- 1.5 --
--------------------------------
NET EXPENSE ......................... $ 14.9 $ (0.5) $ 13.2 $ 0.2
========================================================================
========================================================================
COMPONENTS OF NET
PERIODIC BENEFIT
COST SIX MONTHS ENDED
(In millions) JUNE 30,
========================================================================
2004 2003
---------------------------------
PENSION OPEB Pension OPEB
---------------------------------
Service cost ........................ $ 7.0 $ 0.3 $ 5.0 $ 0.4
Interest cost ....................... 29.7 3.5 28.1 4.4
Expected return on plan assets ..... (25.1) -- (22.0) --
Amortization of prior service cost . 2.7 (6.3) 2.8 (6.4)
Amortization of unrecognized
actuarial loss ................... 8.8 1.4 9.4 2.0
-----------------------------------
NET U.S. PERIODIC BENEFIT COST ..... 23.1 (1.1) 23.3 0.4
Foreign and other .................. 4.1 -- 3.4 --
-----------------------------------
NET EXPENSE ........................ $ 27.2 $ (1.1) $ 26.7 $ 0.4
========================================================================
At the December 31, 2003 measurement date for Grace's defined benefit pension
plans (the "Plans"), the accumulated benefit obligation ("ABO") was
approximately $1,222 million as measured under U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (reflecting an increase of approximately $55 million in
the second quarter of 2004 for the results of a recent actuarial experience
study). At June 30, 2004, Grace's recorded pension liability for underfunded
plans was $386.0 million ($315.6 million included in liabilities not subject to
compromise and $70.4 million related to supplemental pension benefits for
officers and certain key employees, included in "liabilities subject to
compromise"). The recorded ABO liability reflects (1) the shortfall between
dedicated assets and the ABO of underfunded plans ($222.6 million); and (2) the
ABO of pay-as-you-go plans ($163.4 million).
Grace plans to pay benefits as they become due under virtually all pay-as-you-go
plans and to contribute approximately $20 million to its U.S. qualified defined
benefit pension plans in 2004. Contributions to the U.S. qualified pension plans
are subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court. Grace expects to make
payments of approximately $4.4 million to participants in its domestic
nonqualified pension plans, approximately $14 million under non-U.S. plans, and
approximately $12 million to its other postretirement benefit programs in 2004.
Payments to fund the postretirement health care and life insurance benefit
programs are discretionary and not subject to any minimum regulatory funding
requirements. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, Grace made
benefit payments of $5.5 million and $5.7 million, respectively, under these
programs.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grace is a global producer of specialty chemicals and specialty materials. It
generates revenues from two business segments: Davison Chemicals, which consists
of the refining technologies and specialty materials product groups; and
Performance Chemicals, which consists of the specialty construction chemicals,
building materials, and sealants and coatings product groups. Intersegment
sales, eliminated in consolidation, are not material. The table below presents
information related to Grace's business segments for the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. Only those corporate expenses
directly related to the segment are allocated for reporting purposes. All
remaining corporate items are reported separately and labeled as corporate costs
or other.
===================================================================
BUSINESS SEGMENT THREE MONTHS SIX MONTHS
DATA ENDED ENDED
(In millions) JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
===================================================================
2004 2003 2004 2003
---------------------------------------
NET SALES
Davison Chemicals ...... $ 297.8 $ 261.6 $ 568.7 $ 500.7
Performance Chemicals .. 274.6 241.8 522.2 447.5
----------------------------------------
TOTAL .................. $ 572.4 $ 503.4 $ 1,090.9 $ 948.2
=======================================
PRE-TAX OPERATING INCOME
Davison Chemicals ...... $ 37.5 $ 27.3 $ 69.5 $ 47.6
Performance Chemicals .. 38.9 25.8 66.5 37.9
----------------------------------------
TOTAL .................. $ 76.4 $ 53.1 $ 136.0 $ 85.5
===================================================================
I-22
The table below presents information related to the geographic areas in which
Grace operated for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.
================================================================
GEOGRAPHIC AREA THREE MONTHS SIX MONTHS
DATA ENDED ENDED
(In millions) JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
================================================================
2004 2003 2004 2003
-------------------------------------
NET SALES
United States ........ $ 223.9 $ 201.0 $ 426.1 $ 389.7
Canada and Puerto Rico 26.8 18.2 49.7 33.8
Europe, other than
Germany ............ 176.8 153.4 342.0 288.1
Germany .............. 29.1 21.7 57.3 41.8
Asia Pacific ......... 86.7 83.9 159.5 145.3
Latin America ........ 29.1 25.2 56.3 49.5
-------------------------------------
TOTAL .................. $ 572.4 $ 503.4 $ 1,090.9 $ 948.2
================================================================
The pre-tax operating income for Grace's business segments for the three-month
and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 is reconciled below to income
before Chapter 11 expenses, income taxes, and minority interest presented in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
================================================================
RECONCILIATION OF
BUSINESS SEGMENT
DATA TO FINANCIAL THREE MONTHS SIX MONTHS
STATEMENTS ENDED ENDED
(In millions) JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
================================================================
2004 2003 2004 2003
-------------------------------------
Pre-tax operating
income - business
segments ............ $ 76.4 $ 53.1 $ 136.0 $ 85.5
Minority interest ..... 2.6 0.3 3.1 0.5
Loss on sale of
investments and
disposals of
assets .............. (0.1) (0.6) (0.3) (0.9)
Provision for
environmental
remediation ......... -- (0.5) -- (2.5)
Interest expense and
related financing
costs ............... (3.9) (4.1) (7.8) (8.3)
Corporate costs ....... (27.1) (19.5) (48.2) (38.4)
Other, net ............ (8.0) (4.9) (11.2) (8.4)
-------------------------------------
Income before Chapter
11 expenses, income
taxes, and minority
interest ............ $ 39.9 $ 23.8 $ 71.6 $ 27.5
================================================================
Corporate costs include expenses of corporate headquarters functions incurred in
support of core operations, such as corporate financial and legal services,
human resources management, communications and regulatory affairs. This item
also includes certain pension and postretirement benefits, including the
amortization of deferred actuarial losses, that are considered a core operating
cost but not allocated to business segments.
I-23
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF CORE BUSINESS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W. R. Grace & Co. and its subsidiaries are engaged in specialty chemicals and
specialty materials businesses on a worldwide basis through two business
segments: Davison Chemicals, which includes two main product groups - refining
technologies and specialty materials; and Performance Chemicals, which includes
three product groups - specialty construction chemicals, building materials and
sealants and coatings. During the second quarter, Grace realigned its Davison
Chemicals product groups into "refining technologies" (which includes catalysts
and other products and services used by petroleum refiners) and "specialty
materials" (which includes specialty catalysts, engineered materials, and
products used for separations and life sciences applications). All sales
information for the Davison Chemicals segment has been restated to reflect this
realignment.
The table below shows the Grace business segments and product groups as a
percentage of total Grace sales.
====================================================================
THREE MONTHS SIX MONTHS
ENDED ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
====================================================================
2004 2003 2004 2003
---------------------------------------
Refining technologies....... 29.4% 30.2% 28.7% 30.1%
Specialty materials ........ 22.6% 21.8% 23.4% 22.7%
---------------------------------------
DAVISON CHEMICALS .......... 52.0% 52.0% 52.1% 52.8%
---------------------------------------
Construction
chemicals ................. 24.1% 22.6% 23.3% 21.6%
Building materials ......... 11.6% 11.8% 11.6% 11.9%
Sealants and coatings 12.3% 13.6% 13.0% 13.7%
---------------------------------------
PERFORMANCE
CHEMICALS ................. 48.0% 48.0% 47.9% 47.2%
---------------------------------------
TOTAL ...................... 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
====================================================================
Refining technologies includes: fluid cracking catalysts and additives used in
petroleum refineries to convert distilled crude oil into transportation fuels
and other petroleum-based products, and hydroprocessing catalysts used to
upgrade heavy oils and remove certain impurities. Key external drivers for
refining technologies products are the economics of the refining industry,
specifically the impacts of demand for transportation fuels and petrochemical
products, and crude oil supply.
Specialty materials includes: silica products, which are used in a wide range of
industrial and consumer applications such as paper, wood and coil coatings, food
processing, plastics, adsorbents, personal care products and biotechnology
separations; polyolefin catalysts, which are essential components in the
manufacture of polyethylene and polypropylene resins used in products such as
plastic film, high-performance plastic pipe and other plastic parts; and
chemical catalysts, which are used in a variety of chemical processes. Sales of
these products are affected most by general economic conditions, and
specifically by the underlying growth rate of targeted applications.
Construction chemicals and building materials are used primarily by the
non-residential construction industry. Construction chemicals add strength,
control corrosion, and enhance the handling and application of concrete, and
reduce the manufacturing cost and improve the quality of cement. Performance for
this product group is driven by non-residential construction activity and, to a
lesser extent, residential construction activity, which tend to lag the general
economy in both decline and recovery. Building materials prevent water damage to
structures and protect structural steel against collapse due to fire. The
performance of this product group also is driven by non-residential construction
activity and by residential re-roofing activity, with greater lags than
construction chemicals, reflecting longer lead times for large projects. Since
building materials is largely a North American product group, it is most
strongly affected by U.S. construction activity.
Sealants and coatings are used to seal beverage and food cans, and glass and
plastic bottles, and to protect metal packaging from corrosion and the contents
from the influences of metal. Although this product group is affected by general
economic conditions, there is an ongoing shift in demand from metal and glass to
plastic packaging for foods and beverages. This shift is causing a decline in
can sealant usage and providing some opportunities to closure sealants and other
products for plastic packaging.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOLUNTARY BANKRUPTCY FILING
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of Grace's
Voluntary Bankruptcy Filing.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles requires that management make estimates and
assumptions affecting the assets and liabilities reported at the date of the
Consolidated Financial Statements, and the revenues and expenses reported for
the periods presented. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates. Changes
in estimates are recorded in the
I-24
period identified. Grace's accounting measurements that are most affected by
management's estimates of future events are:
o Contingent liabilities such as asbestos-related matters (see Note 3 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements), environmental remediation (see Note 12
to the Consolidated Financial Statements), income taxes (see Note 12 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements), and retained obligations of divested
businesses.
o Pension and postretirement liabilities that depend on assumptions regarding
discount rates and/or total returns on invested funds.
o Depreciation and amortization periods for long-lived assets, including
property and equipment, intangible, and other assets.
o Realization values of various assets such as net deferred tax assets, trade
receivables, inventories, insurance receivables, income taxes, and goodwill.
The accuracy of these and other estimates may also be materially affected by the
uncertainties arising under the Chapter 11 Cases.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Set forth below is a chart that lists key operating statistics, and dollar and
percentage changes for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004
and 2003. The chart should be referenced when reading management's discussion
and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. The chart, as
well as the financial information presented throughout this discussion, divides
Grace's financial results between "core operations" and "noncore activities."
Core operations comprise the financial results of Davison Chemicals, Performance
Chemicals and the costs of corporate activities that directly or indirectly
support business operations. In contrast, noncore activities comprise all other
events and transactions not directly related to the generation of operating
revenue or the support of core operations and generally relate to Grace's former
operations and products.
Neither pre-tax income from core operations nor pre-tax income from core
operations before depreciation and amortization purport to represent income or
cash flow as defined under generally accepted accounting principles, and should
not be considered an alternative to such measures as an indicator of Grace's
performance. These measures are provided to distinguish operating results of
Grace's current business base from results and related assets and liabilities of
past businesses, discontinued products and corporate legacies.
I-25
================================================================================================================================
ANALYSIS OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
(In millions) JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
================================================================================================================================
$ Change % Change $ Change % Change
Fav Fav Fav Fav
2004 2003 (Unfav) (Unfav) 2004 2003 (Unfav) (Unfav)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET SALES:
Davison Chemicals ........... $ 297.8 $ 261.6 $ 36.2 13.8% $ 568.7 $ 500.7 $ 68.0 13.6%
Performance Chemicals........ 274.6 241.8 32.8 13.6% 522.2 447.5 74.7 16.7%
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL GRACE SALES - CORE OPERATIONS $ 572.4 $ 503.4 $ 69.0 13.7% $1,090.9 $ 948.2 $ 142.7 15.0%
================================================================================================================================
PRE-TAX OPERATING INCOME
Davison Chemicals(1) ........ $ 37.5 $ 27.3 $ 10.2 37.4% $ 69.5 $ 47.6 $ 21.9 46.0%
Performance Chemicals ....... 38.9 25.8 13.1 50.8% 66.5 37.9 28.6 75.5%
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corporate costs:
Support functions ......... (8.6) (7.3) (1.3) (17.8%) (16.6) (15.4) (1.2) (7.8%)
Pension, performance-related
compensation, and other . (18.5) (12.2) (6.3) (51.6%) (31.6) (23.0) (8.6) (37.4%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Corporate costs ....... (27.1) (19.5) (7.6) (39.0%) (48.2) (38.4) (9.8) (25.5%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRE-TAX INCOME FROM CORE OPERATIONS 49.3 33.6 15.7 46.7% 87.8 47.1 40.7 86.4%
PRE-TAX LOSS FROM NONCORE ACTIVITIES (9.5) (7.3) (2.2) (30.1%) (13.8) (14.3) 0.5 3.5%
Interest expense ................ (3.9) (4.1) 0.2 4.9% (7.8) (8.3) 0.5 6.0%
Interest income ................. 1.4 1.3 0.1 7.7% 2.3 2.5 (0.2) (8.0%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INCOME BEFORE CHAPTER 11 EXPENSES
AND INCOME TAXES ............. 37.3 23.5 13.8 58.7% 68.5 27.0 41.5 153.7%
Chapter 11 expenses, net ........ (3.0) (6.8) 3.8 55.9% (7.5) (9.5) 2.0 21.1%
Provision for income taxes ...... (13.0) (10.2) (2.8) (27.5%) (23.9) (13.3) (10.6) (79.7%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME ...................... $ 21.3 $ 6.5 $ 14.8 227.7% $ 37.1 $ 4.2 $ 32.9 783.3%
================================================================================================================================
KEY FINANCIAL MEASURES:
PRE-TAX INCOME FROM CORE OPERATIONS
AS PERCENTAGE OF SALES:
Davison Chemicals(1) ....... 12.6% 10.4% NM 2.2 pts 12.2% 9.5% NM 2.7 pts
Performance Chemicals ....... 14.2% 10.7% NM 3.5 pts 12.7% 8.5% NM 4.2 pts
Total Core Operations ....... 8.6% 6.7% NM 1.9 pts 8.0% 5.0% NM 3.0 pts
PRE-TAX INCOME FROM CORE OPERATIONS
BEFORE DEPRECIATION
AND AMORTIZATION ............. $ 75.6 $ 58.9 $ 16.7 28.4% $ 141.3 $ 97.1 $ 44.2 45.5%
AS A PERCENTAGE OF SALES .... 13.2% 11.7% NM 1.5 pts 13.0% 10.2% NM 2.8 pts
================================================================================================================================
NET CONSOLIDATED SALES BY REGION:
North America ............... $ 250.7 $ 219.2 $ 31.5 14.4% $ 475.8 $ 423.5 $ 52.3 12.3%
Europe ...................... 205.9 175.1 30.8 17.6% 399.3 329.9 69.4 21.0%
Asia Pacific ................ 86.7 83.9 2.8 3.3% 159.5 145.3 14.2 9.8%
Latin America ............... 29.1 25.2 3.9 15.5% 56.3 49.5 6.8 13.7%
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL .......................... $ 572.4 $ 503.4 $ 69.0 13.7% $1,090.9 $ 948.2 $ 142.7 15.0%
================================================================================================================================
NM = Not meaningful (1) Pre-tax operating income for Davison Chemicals excludes the income or loss attributable to the
interests of the minority owner in the Advanced Refining Technologies joint venture.
I-26
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GRACE OVERVIEW
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET SALES
The following tables identify the year-over-year increase or decrease in sales
attributable to changes in product volume, product price and/or mix, and the
impact of foreign currency translation for the three-month and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
==============================================================
NET SALES THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2004 AS A
VARIANCE PERCENTAGE INCREASE (DECREASE) FROM
ANALYSIS THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003
==============================================================
CURRENCY
VOLUME PRICE/MIX TRANSLATION TOTAL
-----------------------------------------
Davison Chemicals.. 2.7% 8.1% 3.0% 13.8%
Performance
Chemicals ....... 10.8% (0.7%) 3.5% 13.6%
Net sales.......... 6.6% 3.8% 3.3% 13.7%
- --------------------------------------------------------------
BY REGION:
North America.... 7.9% 6.2% 0.3% 14.4%
Europe........... 8.1% 1.7% 7.8% 17.6%
Latin America.... 12.7% 4.0% (1.2%) 15.5%
Asia Pacific..... (5.1%) 5.5% 2.9% 3.3%
==============================================================
Grace's sales in the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 were favorably
impacted by higher volumes, primarily of construction chemicals and specialty
materials, improved product mix in refining technologies, and currency
translation from a weaker U.S. dollar. Foreign currency translation contributed
$16.4 million or 3.3 percentage points of the sales growth, mainly due to the
strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar. Acquisitions contributed $7.9
million or 1.6 percentage points to the sales growth, primarily from Grace's
acquisition in October 2003 of certain assets of Tricosal Beton - Chemie GmbH &
Co. KG, a leading supplier of specialty chemicals and materials to the European
construction industry.
==============================================================
NET SALES SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2004 AS A
VARIANCE PERCENTAGE INCREASE (DECREASE)FROM
ANALYSIS SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003
==============================================================
CURRENCY
VOLUME PRICE/MIX TRANSLATION TOTAL
------------------------------------------
Davison Chemicals.. 1.5% 7.4% 4.7% 13.6%
Performance
Chemicals ....... 12.3% (0.7%) 5.1% 16.7%
Net sales.......... 6.6% 3.5% 4.9% 15.0%
- --------------------------------------------------------------
BY REGION:
North America.... 6.7% 5.2% 0.4% 12.3%
Europe........... 8.5% 1.0% 11.5% 21.0%
Latin America.... 7.7% 4.2% 1.8% 13.7%
Asia Pacific..... 0.7% 5.1% 4.0% 9.8%
==============================================================
Grace's sales in the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 were favorably
impacted by higher volume in construction chemicals, product mix in refining
technologies, and favorable currency translation from a weaker U.S. dollar.
Foreign currency translation contributed $46.3 million or 4.9 percentage points
of the sales growth, mainly due to the strengthening of the Euro against the
U.S. dollar. In addition, acquisitions contributed $13.7 million or 1.4
percentage points of the sales volume growth.
PRE-TAX INCOME FROM CORE OPERATIONS
Operating profit and margins for the three-month and six- month periods ended
June 30, 2004 were higher as compared with the prior year periods primarily due
to higher sales from improved economic conditions, including stronger
construction activity in the U.S., cost structure improvements from successful
productivity initiatives, and foreign currency translation effects.
Corporate costs include corporate functional costs (such as financial and legal
services, human resources, communications and information technology), the cost
of corporate governance (including directors and officers ("D&O") liability
insurance, a portion of which is allocated to noncore activities) and pension
costs related to both corporate employees and to the effects of changes in
assets and liabilities for all Grace pension plans. Corporate costs for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 were higher than the
comparable prior year periods primarily due to performance-related compensation
and added professional fees in preparation for the review and audit of
accounting controls under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
PRE-TAX LOSS FROM NONCORE ACTIVITIES
===============================================================
THREE MONTHS SIX MONTHS
ENDED ENDED
(In millions) JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
===============================================================
2004 2003 2004 2003
------- ------- ------- --------
Environmental provision
vermiculite mining ..... $ -- $ (0.5) $ -- $ (2.5)
Environmental provision
all other sites ........ -- -- -- --
Provision for asbestos-related
litigation ............. -- -- -- --
COLI income, net ......... 0.7 1.2 2.2 4.3
D&O insurance cost ....... (1.3) (1.7) (2.6) (3.4)
Pension and postretirement
benefit costs .......... (2.3) (2.8) (4.5) (5.7)
Translation effects -
intercompany loan....... 0.5 -- (1.1) --
Value of currency hedges.. (9.3) -- (9.3) --
Foreign currency
transaction effects..... 0.4 (2.0) 0.6 (3.3)
Other .................... 1.8 (1.5) 0.9 (3.7)
------- ------- ------- --------
$ (9.5)$ (7.3) $(13.8 $ (14.3)
===============================================================
Pre-tax loss from noncore activities for the three-month and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2004 were
I-27
comparable to the prior-year periods except for the foreign currency effect of
an intercompany loan as described below, and a pre-tax charge of $0.5 million in
the second quarter of 2003, for a total of $2.5 million for the year, to adjust
Grace's then current estimate of defense costs in connection with a cost
recovery lawsuit brought by the U.S. government relating to Grace's former
vermiculite mining and processing activities near Libby, Montana.
In March 2004, Grace began accounting for currency fluctuations on a Euro 293
million intercompany loan between Grace's subsidiaries in the United States and
Germany as a component of operating results instead of a component of other
comprehensive income. The change was prompted by new tax laws in Germany and
Grace's cash flow planning for its Chapter 11 reorganization, which indicated
that it is no longer reasonable to consider this loan as part of the permanent
capital structure in Germany. The effect of the change in exchange rates related
to this loan for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2004 was $0.5
million favorable and $1.1 million unfavorable, respectively.
In May 2004, Grace entered into a series of foreign currency hedge
agreements to mitigate future currency fluctuations on the remaining loan
balance. These hedge agreements have varying rates that coincide with loan
repayments due periodically through June 2005. In 2004, Euro 70 million of loan
principal was repaid. For the six months ended June 2004, a $9.3 million hedge
loss was recognized, in addition to a $1.1 million foreign currency loss, and
was reported in other expense (income). These hedges are considered derivative
instruments that are viewed as risk management tools by Grace and are not used
for trading or speculative purposes.
CHAPTER 11 EXPENSES
Although it is difficult to measure precisely how Chapter 11 has impacted
Grace's overall financial performance, there are certain added costs that are
directly attributable to operating under the Bankruptcy Code. Net Chapter 11
expenses consist primarily of legal, financial and consulting fees incurred by
Grace and three creditors' committees. Grace believes that Chapter 11 expenses
will range between $2 million and $6 million per quarter for the foreseeable
future depending on the extent of Bankruptcy Court proceedings over the period.
In addition, Grace's pre-tax income from core operations included expenses for
Chapter 11-related compensation of $7.1 million and $4.3 million for the
three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, as well as $10.8 million and
$8.1 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. As a
consequence of operating under Chapter 11, Grace changed its long-term incentive
compensation program from a stock-based to a cash-based program. Grace has also
sought to address employee retention issues by providing additional compensation
to certain employees and increasing Grace's contribution to its retirement
savings and investment plan.
There are numerous other indirect costs to manage Grace's Chapter 11 proceedings
such as: management time devoted to Chapter 11 matters; added cost of debt
capital; added costs of general business insurance, including D&O liability
insurance premiums; and lost business and acquisition opportunities due to the
complexities of operating under Chapter 11.
INTEREST
Net interest expense in the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30,
2004 was consistent with the prior year period. The payment of interest accrued
on pre-petition debt is subject to the outcome of Grace's Chapter 11
proceedings.
INCOME TAXES
Grace's provision for income taxes at the federal corporate rate of 35.0% was
$21.4 million and $6.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. The primary differences between these amounts and the overall
provision for income taxes is attributable to current period interest on tax
contingencies and the non-deductibility of certain Chapter 11 expenses, both of
which add to tax expense
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BUSINESS SEGMENT OVERVIEW
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DAVISON CHEMICALS
Recent Acquisitions and Joint Ventures
See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of
acquisitions and joint ventures completed in the six-month period ended June 30,
2003.
I-28
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004
==============================================================
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
------------------------------------------
NET SALES BY $ Change % Change
PRODUCT LINE Fav Fav
(In millions) 2004 2003 (Unfav) (Unfav)
==============================================================
Refining
technologies.. $ 168.5 $ 151.9 $ 16.6 10.9%
Specialty
materials...... 129.3 109.7 19.6 17.9%
------------------------------------------
TOTAL DAVISON
CHEMICALS..... $ 297.8 $ 261.6 $ 36.2 13.8%
==============================================================
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
------------------------------------------
NET SALES BY $ Change % Change
REGION Fav Fav
(In millions) 2004 2003 (Unfav) (Unfav)
==============================================================
North America... $ 115.8 $ 94.6 $ 21.2 22.4%
Europe.......... 122.8 106.2 16.6 15.6%
Asia Pacific.... 47.4 49.7 (2.3) (4.6%)
Latin America... 11.8 11.1 0.7 6.3%
------------------------------------------
TOTAL DAVISON
CHEMICALS...... $ 297.8 $ 261.6 $ 36.2 13.8%
==============================================================
Sales
Second quarter sales for the Davison Chemicals segment were favorably affected
by an improved global economic environment and, to a lesser extent, favorable
currency translation (which contributed 3.0 percentage points of the increase
for the quarter). Sales of refining technologies products increased primarily
from favorable product mix factors, including sales of higher performing
catalysts, added revenue from the pass-through of certain raw material costs,
and favorable foreign currency translation (1.9 percentage points of the
increase). Sales of specialty materials products increased primarily from strong
volume in all key regions from specialty catalysts and silica materials, and
favorable foreign currency translation (4.6 percentage points). Growth programs
for silica products used in separations and coatings applications also
contributed to the sales increase.
The North American, European, and Latin American regions experienced an increase
in sales during the second quarter of 2004. In North America, increased sales
were primarily attributable to volume growth in both refining technologies and
specialty materials, as well as favorable product mix factors, reflecting
stronger economic activity in the United States. Sales in Europe were up
primarily due to favorable foreign currency translation as well as volume growth
in specialty materials. Increased sales in Latin America were attributable to
volume growth in higher performing refining catalysts. Sales in Asia Pacific
declined slightly, primarily within the refining technologies products group,
due to a change in order patterns during the first half of 2004 and lower volume
in the region.
Operating Income
Pre-tax operating income of the Davison Chemicals segment for the second quarter
was higher than the 2003 second quarter, driven primarily by higher sales in
North America and Europe, as well as foreign currency translation effects.
Operating margin was also higher than the comparable prior year quarter,
primarily from favorable product mix and lower manufacturing costs.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
==============================================================
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
-------------------------------------------
NET SALES BY Change % Change
PRODUCT LINE$ Fav Fav
(In millions) 2004 2003 (Unfav) (Unfav)
==============================================================
Refining
technologies.. $ 313.6 $ 285.0 $ 28.6 10.0%
Specialty
materials...... 255.1 215.7 39.4 18.3%
-------------------------------------------
TOTAL DAVISON
CHEMICALS..... $ 568.7 $ 500.7 $ 68.0 13.6%
==============================================================
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
-------------------------------------------
NET SALES BY $ Change % Change
REGION Fav Fav
(In millions) 2004 2003 (Unfav) (Unfav)
==============================================================
North America... $ 220.8 $ 190.9 $ 29.9 15.7%
Europe.......... 240.3 206.0 34.3 16.7%
Asia Pacific.... 85.2 81.2 4.0 4.9%
Latin America... 22.4 22.6 (0.2) (0.9%)
-------------------------------------------
TOTAL DAVISON
CHEMICALS...... $ 568.7 $ 500.7 $ 68.0 13.6%
==============================================================
Sales
Year-to-date sales for the Davison Chemicals segment benefited from the improved
global economic environment and favorable foreign currency translation (which
accounted for 8.9 percentage points of the increase). Sales increases of
refining technologies products reflected favorable foreign currency translation
(7.0 percentage points), higher volumes of hydroprocessing catalysts and a
favorable product mix of fluid cracking catalysts. High demand for
transportation fuels and high costs of crude oil resulted in increases in both
volume and production rates of major petroleum refineries world-wide. These are
favorable factors for refining catalysts suppliers.
Sales increases of specialty materials products reflected favorable foreign
currency translation (11.3 percentage points), and higher volumes of polyolefin
catalysts and silica products used in coatings, separations, and consumer
applications. Stronger economic activity in the United States and Europe were
the primary market factors driving the increase.
Sales in all regions were up due to increased volume and favorable foreign
currency translation. In North America, increased sales were primarily
attributable to
I-29
volume growth in both refining technologies and specialty
materials, as well as favorable product mix factors, reflecting stronger
economic activity in the United States. European and Latin American sales were
higher due to the effects of favorable currency translation and growth in
specialty materials products. Sales in Asia Pacific were up primarily from
volume growth in specialty materials and favorable product mix factors in
refining technologies, as well as the effects of favorable currency translation.
Operating Income
Year to date operating income of the Davison Chemicals segment was up from 2003,
driven primarily by higher sales in North America and Europe, as well as foreign
currency translation effects on Euro-based sales. The operating margin increase
over the prior year period was attributable to favorable product mix, lower
manufacturing costs and positive results from productivity initiatives.
PERFORMANCE CHEMICALS
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004
==============================================================
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
--------------------------------------
NET SALES BY $ Change % Change
PRODUCT LINE Fav Fav
(In millions) 2004 2003 (Unfav) (Unfav)
==============================================================
Construction chemicals. $ 138.0 $ 114.0 $ 24.0 21.1%
Building materials..... 66.1 59.6 6.5 10.9%
Sealants and coatings.. 70.5 68.2 2.3 3.4%
TOTAL PERFORMANCE
CHEMICALS............. $ 274.6 $ 241.8 $ 32.8 13.6%
==============================================================
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
--------------------------------------
NET SALES BY REGION $ Change % Change
(In millions) Fav Fav
2004 2003 (Unfav) (Unfav)
==============================================================
North America.......... $ 135.0 $ 124.6 $ 10.4 8.3%
Europe................. 83.1 69.0 14.1 20.4%
Asia Pacific........... 39.3 34.2 5.1 14.9%
Latin America.......... 17.2 14.0 3.2 22.9%
--------------------------------------
TOTAL PERFORMANCE
CHEMICALS............. $ 274.6 $ 241.8 $ 32.8 13.6%
==============================================================
Sales
The increase in sales for the Performance Chemicals segment in the second
quarter of 2004 was primarily attributable to broad-based volume growth, a
recent acquisition, and favorable foreign currency translation. The October 2003
acquisition of certain assets of Tricosal Beton-Chemie GmbH & Co. KG by a German
subsidiary accounted for $7.7 million, or 3.2 percentage points of the sales
growth, while currency translation accounted for 3.5 percentage points of the
sales growth. In addition to sales from the German acquisition, the sales
increase in construction chemicals primarily reflected the continued success of
customer and new product programs worldwide. The increase in sales of building
materials was mainly due to increases in specialty waterproofing products,
especially roofing underlayments, which were favorably impacted by a continuing
high level of residential re-roofing activity, and the effects of favorable
foreign currency translation. Sales increases in sealants and coatings reflected
favorable foreign currency translation (3.7 percentage points) and growth
initiatives in coatings and closure sealants, partially offset by declines in
tolling revenue.
Sales increases in North America mainly reflected the success of construction
chemicals and waterproofing growth programs. In Europe, higher sales were due to
favorable foreign currency translation (8.9 percentage points) and the German
acquisition (11.2 percentage points). Sales in Asia Pacific increased from the
effects of favorable foreign currency translation (6.7 percentage points), as
well as volume growth, primarily in construction chemicals. Increased sales in
Latin America primarily reflected volume growth in construction chemicals,
closure sealants and coatings.
Operating Income
Pre-tax operating income and operating margin were substantially higher in the
second quarter of 2004 compared with the prior year period reflecting sales
increases, successful productivity programs, discretionary expense management
and favorable foreign currency translation. While the second quarter of 2003 was
not a strong quarter, mainly due to depressed commercial construction activity
in the U.S., operating income for the second quarter of 2004 also exceeded 2002
by more than 25% at constant exchange rates.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
==============================================================
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
--------------------------------------
NET SALES BY Change % Change
PRODUCT LINE Fav Fav
(In millions) 2004 2003 (Unfav) (Unfav)
==============================================================
Construction chemicals. $ 254.4 $ 204.8 $ 49.6 24.2%
Building materials..... 125.9 113.1 12.8 11.3%
Sealants and coatings.. 141.9 129.6 12.3 9.5%
--------------------------------------
TOTAL PERFORMANCE
CHEMICALS............. $ 522.2 $ 447.5 $ 74.7 16.7%
==============================================================
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
--------------------------------------
$ Change % Change
NET SALES BY REGION Fav Fav
(In millions) 2004 2003 (Unfav) (Unfav)
==============================================================
North America.......... $ 255.1 $ 232.6 $ 22.5 9.7%
Europe................. 159.0 124.0 35.0 28.2%
Asia Pacific........... 74.3 64.1 10.2 15.9%
Latin America.......... 33.8 26.8 7.0 26.1%
--------------------------------------
TOTAL PERFORMANCE
CHEMICALS............. $ 522.2 $ 447.5 $ 74.7 16.7%
==============================================================
I-30
Sales
The increase in sales for the Performance Chemicals segment in the first half of
2004 was primarily attributable to volume growth in all product lines, the
German acquisition, and favorable foreign currency translation. The acquisition
accounted for $12.9 million, or 2.9 percentage points of the sales growth, while
currency translation accounted for 5.1 percentage points of the sales growth.
Aside from the acquisition, the sales increase in construction chemicals
primarily reflected the continued success of customer and new product programs
and stronger U.S. commercial construction activity versus a particularly weak
first quarter in 2003, as well as foreign currency translation. The increase in
sales of building materials was mainly due to increases in specialty
waterproofing products, especially roofing underlayments, driven by strong
re-roofing activity and continued penetration against other technologies, and
the impact of favorable foreign currency translation. The increase was partially
offset by a small decline in sales of fire protection products resulting from
building code changes. Sales increases in sealants and coatings reflected
favorable foreign currency translation (6.1 percentage points) and growth
initiatives in coatings and closure sealants, partially offset by declines in
tolling revenue.
Sales increases in North America reflected the success of construction chemicals
and waterproofing growth programs, as well as higher U.S. construction activity
from good construction weather in the first quarter. In Europe, higher sales
were due to favorable foreign currency translation (12.8 percentage points), the
German acquisition (10.4 percentage points) and volume growth mainly in
construction chemicals. Sales in Asia Pacific increased from the effects of
favorable foreign currency translation (7.8 percentage points), as well as
volume growth, primarily in construction chemicals. Increased sales in Latin
America reflected currency translation (1.5 percentage points) and volume
increases in construction chemicals, closure sealants and coatings.
Operating Income
Pre-tax operating income and operating margin were substantially higher in the
first half of 2004 compared with the first half of 2003, reflecting similar
economic conditions and factors to those experienced in the second quarter.
OPERATING RETURNS ON ASSETS EMPLOYED
The following charts set forth the Davison Chemicals and Performance Chemicals
total asset position and pre-tax return on average total assets at June 30, 2004
and December 31, 2003. It should be noted that the manufacture of Davison
Chemicals products generally requires significantly higher capital costs than
the manufacture of Performance Chemicals products.
======================================================================
$ Change % Change
(excluding (excluding
currency currency
DAVISON translation) translation)
CHEMICALS JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, Fav Fav
(In millions) 2004 2003 (Unfav) (Unfav)
======================================================================
Receivables....... $ 172.5 $ 146.3 $ 27.6 18.9%
Inventory......... 138.8 133.6 6.6 4.9%
Other current
assets........... 1.2 2.1 (0.8) (38.1%)
-------------------------------------------------
Total current
assets........... 312.5 282.0 33.4 11.8%
Properties and
equipment,
net.............. 420.8 444.0 (19.6) (4.4%)
Goodwill and
other intangible
assets........... 63.3 65.8 (1.6) (2.4%)
Other assets ..... 2.8 5.3 (2.0) (37.7%)
-------------------------------------------------
Total assets ..... $ 799.4 $ 797.1 $ 10.2 1.3%
=================================================
Pre-tax return on
average total
assets (trailing
12 months)...... 17.7% 15.4%
======================================================================
During the first six months of 2004, Davison Chemicals' total assets increased
by $10.2 million, excluding $7.9 million of unfavorable foreign currency
translation. The increase was due primarily to higher accounts receivable,
offset by a decrease in properties and equipment. The increase in accounts
receivable was primarily due to an overall increase in sales in the second
quarter of 2004 compared with the fourth quarter of 2003. Properties and
equipment decreased due to depreciation expense and lower capital expenditures
as compared with the prior year period, when a major Davison Chemicals plant
expansion was completed.
The pre-tax return on average total assets increased by 2.3 percentage points,
primarily due to a 46.0% increase in pre-tax operating income.
=========================================================================
$ Change % Change
(excluding (excluding
currency currency
PERFORMANCE translation) translation)
CHEMICALS JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, Fav Fav
(In millions) 2004 2003 (Unfav) (Unfav)
=========================================================================
Receivables.......... $ 220.6 $ 196.2 $ 26.7 13.6%
Inventory............ 85.5 80.9 5.6 6.9%
Other current
assets............ 3.8 5.9 (2.1) (35.6%)
-------------------------------------------------
Total current
assets............. 309.9 283.0 30.2 10.7%
Properties and
equipment,
net............... 192.9 203.2 (8.8) (4.3%)
Goodwill and
other intangible
assets............. 82.6 84.5 (0.6) (0.7%)
Other assets......... 41.0 38.5 2.0 5.2%
-------------------------------------------------
Total assets......... $ 626.4 $ 609.2 $ 22.8 3.7%
=================================================
Pre-tax return on
average total
assets (trailing
12 months).......... 22.5% 18.7%
=========================================================================
I-31
Performance Chemicals' total assets increased by $22.8 million, excluding $5.6
million of unfavorable foreign currency translation, primarily due to an
increase in receivables, offset by a decrease in properties and equipment. The
increase in receivables was caused primarily by record sales in the second
quarter of 2004 compared with the fourth quarter of 2003, which is also a low
point in this segment's operating cycle. Depreciation expense exceeded new
capital spending during the first six months of 2004.
The pre-tax return on average total assets increased by 3.8 percentage points,
driven by a 75.5% increase in pre-tax operating income.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL CONDITION
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
EFFECT OF CHAPTER 11
As described under "Voluntary Bankruptcy Filing" in Note 1 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements, the Company and its principal U.S. operating subsidiary
are debtors-in-possession under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Grace's
non-U.S. subsidiaries, although not part of the Filing, are owned directly or
indirectly by the Company's principal operating subsidiary or other filing
entities. Consequently, it is likely that a Chapter 11 reorganization plan will
involve the combined value of Grace's global businesses and its other assets to
fund (with cash and/or securities) Grace's obligations as adjudicated through
the bankruptcy process. Grace has analyzed its cash flow and capital needs to
continue to fund its businesses and believes that, while in Chapter 11,
sufficient cash flow and credit facilities are available to support its business
strategy.
Grace is in the process of developing a proposed plan of reorganization that is
to be filed with the Bankruptcy Court by October 14, 2004. In such plan, Grace
will propose how to resolve its pre-petition liabilities and contingencies,
including undisputed trade-related, employee-related and financing-related
claims, as well as claims associated with asbestos-related litigation,
environmental remediation, tax matters and other claims filed with the
Bankruptcy Court that Grace may dispute. The Chapter 11 proceedings, including
the proposed plan of reorganization due in October or any revised plan, could
result in allowable claims that differ materially from recorded amounts or
amounts in Grace's proposed plan. Grace will continue to adjust its estimates of
allowable claims as facts come to light during the Chapter 11 process that
justify a change, and as Chapter 11 proceedings establish court-accepted
measures of Grace's noncore liabilities.
The following sections address Grace's financial condition in more detail and
describe the major contingencies that are being addressed as part of the Chapter
11 process.
LIABILITIES AND CONTINGENCIES
Grace has a number of financial exposures originating from past businesses,
products and events. These obligations arose from transactions and/or business
practices that date back to when Grace was a much larger company, when it
produced products or operated businesses that are no longer part of its revenue
base, and when government regulations and scientific knowledge were much less
advanced than today. The following table summarizes the net noncore liability at
June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003:
===============================================================
NET NONCORE LIABILITIES JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
(In millions) 2004 2003
===============================================================
Asbestos-related liabilities.. $ (988.4) $ (992.3)
Asbestos-related insurance
receivable ................ 264.0 269.4
--------------------------------
Asbestos-related liability,
net.......................... (724.4) (722.9)
Environmental remediation..... (329.5) (332.4)
Postretirement benefits....... (127.7) (134.3)
Retained obligations and other (56.4) (57.0)
--------------------------------
NET NONCORE LIABILITY......... $(1,238.0) $(1,246.6)
===============================================================
The resolution of most of these noncore recorded and contingent liabilities will
be determined through the Chapter 11 proceedings. Grace cannot predict with any
certainty how, and for what amounts, any of such liabilities will be resolved.
The amounts of these liabilities as ultimately determined through the Chapter 11
proceedings could be materially different from amounts recorded by Grace at June
30, 2004.
ASBESTOS-RELATED MATTERS
Grace is a defendant in lawsuits relating to previously sold asbestos-containing
products. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, Grace had receipts of $5.4
million under settlements with insurance carriers, which offset $3.8 million for
the defense and disposition of asbestos-related property damage and bodily
injury litigation. At June 30, 2004, Grace's balance sheet reflected a gross
asbestos-related liability of $988.4 million ($724.4 million net of insurance).
This liability represents management's estimate, based on facts and
circumstances existing prior to the Filing and an analysis of new property
damage claims received after the Filing, of the undiscounted net cash outflows
necessary to satisfy Grace's pending property damage claims for which sufficient
information is available, and its pending and projected future bodily injury
claims.
I-32
Recently, federal legislation has been proposed to address asbestos bodily
injury claims. In addition, several states have enacted or proposed legislation
affecting asbestos bodily injury claims. At this time, Grace cannot predict what
impact any such legislation would have on Grace's asbestos bodily injury
liability, related insurance coverage, or its ultimate plan of reorganization.
The Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2004 includes an asset of $264.0
million pursuant to settlement agreements with those insurance carriers, which
related directly to the amount and nature of the recorded asbestos-related
liability. The recovery of amounts due from insurance carriers is dependent upon
the timing, character and exposure periods of asbestos-related claims. Grace's
Chapter 11 proceedings and proposed federal legislation could also affect the
timing and amount of Grace's recovery.
Grace intends to address all of its pending and future asbestos-related claims
as part of a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11, which Grace is required to
file with the Bankruptcy Court by October 14, 2004. Measurement of Grace's
asbestos-related liabilities will be materially affected by Bankruptcy Court
rulings, the outcome of litigation and negotiations among interested parties,
and the ultimate form of the plan of reorganization. See Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of Grace's proposed
plan of reorganization.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Grace is subject to loss contingencies resulting from extensive and evolving
federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations. Grace has
expended substantial funds to comply with such laws and regulations and expects
to continue to do so in the future. At June 30, 2004, Grace's recorded liability
for environmental investigation and remediation costs totaled $329.5 million, as
compared with $332.4 million at December 31, 2003. This liability covers both
vermiculite and non-vermiculite related matters. The amount is based on funding
and/or remediation agreements in place, together with Grace's best estimate of
its cost to resolve contamination risks at sites not subject to a formal
remediation plan. The decrease in the liability is primarily attributable to
ongoing remedial efforts at Grace owned sites. Grace's estimated liability for
vermiculite-related remediation at June 30, 2004 was $187.0 million. This
liability represents Grace's estimated cost to remediate and/or to reimburse the
EPA for remediation activities in and around Libby, Montana related to its
former mining activities, and for clean-up of vermiculite processing sites
currently or formerly operated by Grace. However, the EPA's cost estimates have
changed several times and increased substantially over time. Consequently,
Grace's estimated liability may change materially as more information becomes
available. Grace's liability for this matter is included in "liabilities subject
to compromise" as of June 30, 2004.
At June 30, 2004, Grace's estimated liability for remediation of sites not
related to its former vermiculite mining and processing activities was $142.5
million. This liability relates to Grace's current and former operations,
including its share of liability for off-site disposal at facilities where it
has been identified as a potentially responsible party. The decrease from
December 31, 2003 is related to ongoing remedial efforts at Grace owned sites.
This liability also reflects Grace's evaluation of environmental-related claims
submitted as part of the Chapter 11 process for which sufficient information was
available. As Grace receives new information and continues its claims evaluation
process, its estimated liability may change materially. Grace's liability for
this matter is included in "liabilities subject to compromise" as of June 30,
2004.
See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a background
description of Grace's vermiculite and non-vermiculite related matters.
DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS
Grace sponsors defined benefit pension plans for its employees in the United
States, Canada and the United Kingdom, and funds government sponsored programs
in other countries where it operates. Certain of the Grace sponsored plans are
advance-funded and others are pay-as-you-go. The advance-funded plans are
administered by trustees who direct the management of the assets and arrange to
have obligations paid when due out of a trust. The most significant
advance-funded plans cover Grace's salaried employees in the U.S. and employees
covered by collective bargaining agreements at certain of its U.S. facilities.
At the December 31, 2003 measurement date for the U.S. advance-funded defined
benefit pension plans (the "Plans"), the accumulated benefit obligation ("ABO")
was approximately $880 million (as measured under U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles and increased by approximately $55 million in the second
quarter of 2004 for the results of a recent actuarial experience study). The ABO
is measured as the present value (6.25% for December 31, 2003) of vested and
non-vested benefits earned from employee service to date, based upon current
salary levels. Assets available to fund the ABO at December 31, 2003 were
I-33
approximately $658 million, or approximately $222 million less than the measured
obligation
In July 2004, Grace petitioned the Bankruptcy Court for permission to contribute
approximately $20 million to the trusts that hold assets of the Plans. This
request is in addition to a $40.0 million contribution approved by the
Bankruptcy Court for 2003. The 2004 motion is pending. Although it is Grace's
intention to satisfy its obligations under for the Plans and to comply with all
of the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Acts of 1974,
contributions to the Plans' trusts require Bankruptcy Court approval. There can
be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will approve the 2004 motion or any
other arrangement to satisfy the funding needs of the Plans.
See Note 13 for the components of net periodic pension cost for the second
quarter and year-to-date. Grace expects total pension expense for 2004 to be
approximately $55 million, and benefit payments to retirees to aggregate between
$85.0 million and $90.0 million for all pension programs in 2004. At June 30,
2004, Grace's recorded pension liability for underfunded plans was $386.0
million ($315.6 million included in liabilities not subject to compromise and
$70.4 million related to supplemental pension benefits for officers and certain
key employees, included in "liabilities subject to compromise") which includes
the following components: (1) shortfall between dedicated assets and ABO of
underfunded plans ($222.6 million); and (2) ABO of pay-as-you-go plans ($163.4
million).
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
Grace provides certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired
employees, a large majority of which pertain to retirees of previously divested
businesses. These plans are unfunded and Grace pays the costs of benefits under
these plans as they are incurred. Spending under this program was $2.9 million
and $5.5 million during the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30,
2004, compared with $2.6 million and $5.7 million during the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2003. Grace's recorded liability for
postretirement benefits of $127.7 million at June 30, 2004 is stated at net
present value discounted at 6.25%. The continuing payment of these benefits has
been approved by the Bankruptcy Court; however, the program would still be
subject to the terms of a Chapter 11 reorganization plan.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
CASH RESOURCES AND AVAILABLE CREDIT FACILITIES
At June 30, 2004, Grace had $468.3 million in cash and cash-like assets on hand
($371.7 million in cash and cash equivalents and $96.6 million in net cash value
of life insurance). In addition, Grace had access to committed credit facilities
aggregating $250.0 million under the DIP facility, of which $215.2 million (net
of borrowings, letters of credit, and holdback provisions) was available at June
30, 2004. The term of the DIP facility expires April 1, 2006. Grace believes
that these funds and credit facilities will be sufficient to finance its
business strategy while in Chapter 11.
CASH FLOW
=============================================================
SIX MONTHS
CORE OPERATIONS ENDED
(In millions) JUNE 30,
=============================================================
2004 2003
----------- ---------
CASH FLOWS:
Pre-tax operating income........... $ 87.8 $ 47.1
Depreciation and amortization...... 53.5 50.0
----------- ---------
PRE-TAX EARNINGS BEFORE DEPRECIATION
AND AMORTIZATION............... 141.3 97.1
Working capital and other changes.. (28.9) (30.1)
----------- ---------
CASH FLOW BEFORE INVESTING......... 112.4 67.0
Capital expenditures............... (22.5) (44.8)
Businesses acquired................ -- (2.2)
----------- ---------
NET CASH FLOW FROM CORE OPERATIONS. $ 89.9 $ 20.0
=============================================================
Grace's net cash flow from core operations before investing increased due to
higher pre-tax operating income and lower capital expenditures. Working capital
and other items remained basically flat and capital expenditures were down as
compared with the prior year period. Capital expenditures principally
represented spending for routine equipment replacements. A substantial portion
of the expenditures during the first half of 2003 were directed toward the
construction of new refining catalyst production capacity at Grace's Lake
Charles, Louisiana site.
Grace expects to continue to invest excess cash flow and/or other available
capital resources in its core business base. These investments are likely to be
in the form of added plant capacity, product line extensions and geographic
market expansions, and/or acquisitions in existing product lines. Investments
that are outside the ordinary course of business may be subject to Bankruptcy
Court approval and review by the Chapter 11 committees.
I-34
==============================================================
SIX MONTHS
NONCORE ACTIVITIES ENDED
(In millions) JUNE 30,
==============================================================
2004 2003
-----------------------
CASH FLOWS:
Pre-tax loss from noncore activities $ (13.8) $ (14.3)
Non-cash charges................... 13.8 13.4
Cash spending for:
Asbestos-related litigation, net of
insurance recovery.............. 1.6 4.4
Environmental remediation........ (2.9) (6.0)
Postretirement benefits.......... (5.5) (5.7)
Retained obligations and other... (0.7) (0.7)
-----------------------
NET CASH OUTFLOW FOR NONCORE
ACTIVITIES ...................... $ (7.5) $ (8.9)
==============================================================
See the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included in the Consolidated
Financial Statements for investing and financing activities for the six months
ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.
DEBT AND OTHER CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
Total debt outstanding at June 30, 2004 was $570.2 million, including $54.4
million of accrued interest on pre-petition debt. As a result of the Filing,
Grace is now in default on $502.8 million of pre-petition debt which, together
with accrued interest thereon, has been included in "liabilities subject to
compromise" as of June 30, 2004. The automatic stay provided under the
Bankruptcy Code prevents Grace's lenders from taking any action to collect the
principal amounts as well as related accrued interest. However, Grace will
continue to accrue and report interest on such debt during the Chapter 11
proceedings unless further developments lead management to conclude that it is
probable that such interest will be compromised.
See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of
financial assurances.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The forward-looking statements contained in this document are based on current
expectations regarding important risk factors. Actual results may differ
materially from those expressed. In addition to the uncertainties referred to in
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, other uncertainties include: the impact of worldwide economic
conditions; pricing of both Grace's products and raw materials; customer outages
and customer demand; factors resulting from fluctuations in interest rates and
foreign currencies; the impact of competitive products and pricing; the
continued success of Grace's process improvement initiatives; the impact of tax,
legislation and other regulations in the jurisdictions in which Grace operates;
and developments in and the outcome of the Chapter 11 proceedings discussed
above. Also, see "Introduction and Overview - Projections and Other
Forward-Looking Information" in Item 1 of Grace's current Annual Report on Form
10-K.
I-35
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
Grace had no outstanding derivative financial instruments that qualify for
accounting treatment under SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities" at June 30, 2004. Grace has entered into foreign
exchange forward contracts to manage exposure to fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates on an intercompany loan between Grace and a subsidiary
in Germany. (See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.) For further
information concerning Grace's quantitative and qualitative disclosures about
market risk, refer to Notes 13 and 15 in the Consolidated Financial Statements
in Grace's 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
- -------------------------------
GENERAL STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY
The management of Grace is responsible for the preparation, integrity and
objectivity of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the other information
included in this report. The financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America and accordingly include certain amounts that represent management's best
estimates and judgments. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates.
Management maintains internal controls to assist it in fulfilling its
responsibility for financial reporting. These internal controls consist of the
control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and
communication, and monitoring. A chartered Disclosure Committee oversees Grace's
public financial reporting process and key managers are required to confirm
their compliance with Grace's policies and internal controls. While no system of
internal controls can ensure elimination of all errors and irregularities,
Grace's internal controls, which are reviewed and modified in response to
changing conditions, have been designed to provide reasonable assurance that
assets are safeguarded, policies and procedures are followed, transactions are
properly executed and reported, and appropriate disclosures are made. The
concept of reasonable assurance is based on the recognition that there are
limitations in all systems of internal control and that the costs of such
systems should not exceed their benefits.
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of June 30, 2004, Grace carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule
13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"). Based upon that evaluation, Grace's Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed
in the Company's periodic filings under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to such officers to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures. There was no significant change in the Company's internal control
over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
I-36
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes 1, 3 and 12 to the interim consolidated financial statements in Part I of
this Report are incorporated herein by reference.
On June 17, 2004, a purported class action complaint was filed in the United
States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against each member of
Grace's Board of Directors, certain current and former officers and employees of
Grace, certain Grace benefits administration and investment committees, Fidelity
Management Trust Company, State Street Bank & Trust Company, and other "unknown
fiduciary defendants" (collectively, the "Defendants"). The complaint was
brought on behalf of persons who were participants in, or beneficiaries of,
Grace's savings and investment plan, a defined contribution retirement plan
under section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the "S&I Plan"), at any time
between July 1, 1999 and February 27, 2004 (the "Class Period"). One of the
investment options under the S&I Plan was Grace common stock. The complaint
states that the decline in the price of Grace common stock during the Class
Period resulted in significant losses to S&I Plan participants. The complaint
alleges that the Defendants were fiduciaries of the S&I Plan under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA") and that the Defendants
breached their fiduciary duties under ERISA by failing to sell or take other
appropriate action with regard to Grace common stock held by the S&I Plan during
the Class Period, when the Defendants knew or should have known the stock had
become an imprudent investment, principally as a result of the risk related to
Grace's asbestos-related liabilities; and that the Defendants failed to disclose
to S&I Plan participants the risk of investing in Grace common stock. The
complaint seeks relief from the Defendants in the form of a monetary payment to
the S&I Plan to compensate for losses resulting from the breaches of fiduciary
duties outlined above, as well as injunctive and other relief.
Grace believes that prosecution of this class action is stayed by Grace's
Chapter 11 proceeding. Grace likely would have an obligation to indemnify the
Defendants for any liability arising out of this lawsuit. However, Grace also
believes that the allegations are without merit and that any liability arising
therefrom would be covered by its fiduciary liability insurance.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Exhibits. The following is a list of Exhibits filed as part of
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:
15 Accountants' Awareness Letter
31.1 Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer
under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Financial Officer
under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32 Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
II-1
(b) Reports on Form 8-K. The following reports on Form 8-K were filed
during the second quarter of 2004:
April 20, 2004 - Press release announcing Grace's financial
results for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
II-2
SIGNATURE
---------
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
W. R. GRACE & CO.
-----------------
(Registrant)
Date: August 9, 2004 By /s/ Paul J. Norris
------------------
Paul J. Norris
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 9, 2004 By /s/ Robert M. Tarola
--------------------
Robert M. Tarola
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
II-3
EXHIBIT INDEX
-------------
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
- ---------- ----------------------
15 Accountants' Awareness Letter
31.1 Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer
under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Financial Officer
under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32 Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002
II-4