UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-QSB
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 (No fee required)
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___________ to ___________
Commission file number 0-15113
VERITEC, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NEVADA
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
95-3954373
(IRS Employer Identification Number)
2445 Winnetka Avenue North, Golden Valley, MN 55427
(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)
763-253-2670
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 15 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No X
----- -----
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.). Yes No X
----- -----
APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS
Check whether the registrant filed all documents and reports required to be
filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the distribution of
securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes No X
----- -----
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes
of common stock as of the latest practicable date. As of September 30, 2006 the
Company had:
Number of Shares of Common Stock
15,078,598
Transition Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes No X
----- -----
ii
Table of Contents
FORM 10-QSB
VERITEC, INC.
INDEX
Page(s)
-------
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION 1
Item 1. Financial Statements 1
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations 8
Item 3. Controls and Procedures 12
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION 12
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 12
Item 1A. Risk Factors 14
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 16
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 16
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 16
Item 5. Other Information 16
Item 6. Exhibits 16
Signatures 16
Exhibits Index 17
iii
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31, June 30,
2005 2004
------------ ------------
(Unaudited) (Audited)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash $ 723,090 $ 394,067
Certificates of deposit 87,611 120,257
Accounts receivable, net 217,335 949,802
Inventories 6,939 20,730
Prepaid expenses - other 19,876 10,291
Prepaid legal retainer -- 100,000
------------ ------------
Total Current Assets 1,054,851 1,595,147
------------ ------------
Property and Equipment, net 30,892 12,851
------------ ------------
Other Assets:
Note receivable -- 19,622
Security deposits and other assets 24,072 14,270
Software costs, net -- 13,334
Technology rights, net 19,678 41,527
------------ ------------
43,750 88,753
------------ ------------
Total Assets $ 1,129,493 $ 1,696,751
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current Liabilities:
Notes payable - related parties $ 87,587 $ 390,000
Convertible notes - related parties -- 747,374
Current maturities of long-term debt -- 114,681
Accounts payable 1,677,643 1,485,851
Accrued expenses 87,215 372,525
Accrued expense - Mitsubishi litigation 8,174,518 --
------------ ------------
Total Current Liabilities 10,026,963 3,110,431
Long-Term Debt, less current maturities 83,868 169,298
Prepayment on Stock and Subscription Receivable 369,786 19,811
------------ ------------
Total Liabilities 10,480,617 3,299,540
------------ ------------
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders' Deficit:
Convertible preferred stock, par value
$1.00; authorized 10,000,000 shares,
276,000 shares of Series H authorized,
1,000 and 76,000 shares issued 1,000 76,000
Common stock, par value $.01; authorized
20,000,000 shares, 15,078,598 and
7,071,849 shares issued 150,786 70,718
Subscription receivable (601,044) (717,717)
Additional paid-in capital 13,357,321 12,280,961
Accumulated deficit (22,269,014) (13,323,448)
Cumulative translation adjustment 9,827 10,697
------------ ------------
Total Stockholders' Deficit (9,351,124) (1,602,789)
------------ ------------
Total Liabilities and Stockholders'
Deficit $ 1,129,493 $ 1,696,751
============ ============
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months
ended March 31,
--------------------
2005 2004
--------- --------
Revenues $ 142,659 $678,701
Cost of Sales 40,923 53,473
--------- --------
Gross Profit 101,736 625,228
--------- --------
Operating Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative 534,406 410,447
Research and development 78,877 42,745
--------- --------
Total Operating Expenses 613,283 453,192
--------- --------
Income (Loss) from Operations (511,547) 172,036
--------- --------
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income 3,578 --
Interest expense (6,368) (33,711)
Other 2,391 3,200
--------- --------
Total Other Income (Expense) (399) (30,511)
--------- --------
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes (511,946) 141,525
Income Tax Expense -- 477
--------- --------
Net Income (Loss) $(511,946) $141,048
========= ========
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share:
Basic $ (0.03) $ 0.02
Diluted (0.03) 0.01
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Nine months
ended March 31,
------------------------
2005 2004
----------- ----------
Revenues $ 1,671,063 $1,631,068
Cost of Sales 97,265 224,952
----------- ----------
Gross Profit 1,573,798 1,406,116
----------- ----------
Operating Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative 2,106,645 1,485,588
Research and development 184,974 153,683
Mitsubishi litigation 8,174,518 --
----------- ----------
Total Operating Expenses 10,466,137 1,639,271
----------- ----------
Loss from Operations (8,892,339) (233,155)
----------- ----------
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income 6,232 --
Interest expense (62,763) (96,701)
Other 3,304 57,848
----------- ----------
Total Other Income (Expense) (53,227) (38,853)
----------- ----------
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes (8,945,566) (272,008)
Income Tax Expense -- 1,384
----------- ----------
Net Loss $(8,945,566) $ (273,392)
=========== ==========
Net Loss Per Common Share:
Basic $ (0.92) $ (0.04)
Diluted (0.92) (0.04)
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Nine months
ended March 31,
-----------------------
2005 2004
----------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss $(8,945,566) $(273,392)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided
(used) by operating activities:
Depreciation 9,317 35,567
Amortization of intangibles 35,642 --
Stock issued for compensation 66,300 --
Payroll applied to prepayment on subscription receivable 20,527 --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 752,475 (99,378)
Inventories 13,775 (28,794)
Prepaid expenses 90,345 28,655
Other assets 371 972
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 270,096 234,030
Accrued expense - Mitsubishi litigation 8,174,518 --
----------- ---------
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities 487,800 (102,340)
----------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of equipment (27,321) --
Proceeds from certificates of deposit 33,741 --
----------- ---------
Net cash provided by investing activities 6,420 --
----------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from (payments on) notes payable - related parties (50,000) 300,000
Payments on long-term debt (115,385) (46,074)
Proceeds from exercise of stock option -- 3,450
----------- ---------
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities (165,385) 257,376
----------- ---------
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH 188 (20,396)
----------- ---------
NET INCREASE IN CASH 329,023 134,640
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD 394,067 325,193
----------- ---------
CASH AT END OF PERIOD $ 723,090 $ 459,833
=========== =========
NONCASH ACTIVITIES
Notes payable and accrued interest converted into common
stock $ 965,134 $ --
Series H preferred stock converted into common stock 358,734 --
Applied prepayment on subscription receivable to
subscription receivable 166,667 --
Notes payable and accrued interest applied to prepayment on
subscription receivable 411,782 --
Deferred compensation applied to prepayment on subscription
receivable 84,333 --
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A. THE COMPANY
The Company refers to Veritec, Inc. (Veritec) and its wholly owned
subsidiaries, Veritec Iconix Ventures, Inc. (VIVI-USA; inactive and dissolved in
May 2004), Veritec Iconix Ventures, Inc. (VIVI-Japan; a Japanese company), and
VCode Holdings, Inc. (VCode).
B. BANKRUPTCY CONSIDERATIONS
In February 2005, an adverse ruling was made against Veritec and in favor
of Mitsubishi Corporation (Mitsubishi), resulting in a monetary award of
$8,174,518 to Mitsubishi and enjoining Veritec and by extension Veritec's
customers from the future use or sale of what was ruled as Mitsubishi's Error
Detection and Correction Technology. This ruling compelled Veritec to file a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy
Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court (Bankruptcy Court) for the District
of Minnesota on February 28, 2005.
In December 2005, the Bankruptcy Court converted the Chapter 11 proceeding
to Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. Under Chapter 7, Veritec would be
liquidated and the shareholders would not receive anything upon liquidation.
Veritec's Third Amended Plan of Reorganization, with proof of acceptability
of its provisions by Mitsubishi and the majority of the other classes of
creditors, was formally submitted to the Bankruptcy Court with a motion
requesting reconversion of Veritec's case in bankruptcy to Chapter 11. This
motion and related order was approved in March 2006. In March 2006, the order
was executed subject only to approval of the majority of creditors and
shareholders of record, which was subsequently obtained.
Upon execution of the order, Veritec once again became a
"debtor-in-possession" under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court. In
general, as a debtor-in-possession, Veritec was authorized under Chapter 11 to
continue to operate as an ongoing business, but could not engage in transactions
outside the ordinary course of business without the prior approval of the
Bankruptcy Court.
In April 2006, Veritec's Third Amended Plan of Reorganization was confirmed
by the Bankruptcy Court. On August 8, 2006, after resolution of all disputed
creditor claims, Veritec received from the Bankruptcy Court an Order and Final
Decree closing the Chapter 11 case in its entirety. Although not reflected in
these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Veritec was relieved of
$9,356,948 in debt including $7,874,518 owed to Mitsubishi.
Veritec did not file any reports required under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 while in bankruptcy. Veritec is in the process of filing past due
reports.
C. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with United States of America generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-QSB and Item 310(b) of Regulation S-B. Accordingly, the
condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
included. Operating results for the three month and nine month periods ended
March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ended June 30, 2005. For further information, refer to the
Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes thereto included in our Form
10-KSB as of and for the year ended June 30, 2004. The Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet at June 30, 2004 has been derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information
and footnotes required by GAAP.
5
Nature of Business
The Company is primarily engaged in the development, marketing and sales of
a line of microprocessor based encoding and decoding systems that utilize Matrix
Symbology Technology, a two-dimensional barcode technology originally invented
by the founders of Veritec under United States patents 4,924,078, 5,331,176 and
5,612,524. As more fully described below, these patents are the property of
VCode. The Company's encoding and decoding systems allow a manufacturer,
distributor, reseller or user of products to create and apply unique identifiers
to the products in the form of a coded symbol. The coded symbol containing the
binary encoded data applied to the product enables automated manufacturing
control, together with identification, tracking, and collection of data through
cameras, readers and scanners also marketed by the Company. The collected data
is then available for contemporaneous verification or other user definable
purposes. The Company has also developed a Secured Identification System based
upon its proprietary VSCode and VeriCode(R) Symbology. The Company's Secured
Identification System enables the storage of images, biometric information and
data for contemporaneous verification of an individual's unique identity. In
addition to its United States patents, Veritec holds patents in Europe (German
patent No. 69033621.7; French patent No. 0438841; and, Great Britain patent No.
0438841); and has applications pending with the United States Patent and
Trademark Office for novel uses of its Multi-Dimensional Matrix Symbology.
The Company's core business is the sale of its Multi-Dimensional Matrix
Symbology together with its proprietary software products for the writing and
reading thereof. Veritec owns two wholly owned subsidiaries: (1) VIVI-Japan, a
corporation established under the laws of Japan with its principal place of
business located in Osaka, Japan; and, (2) VCode, a Minnesota corporation with
offices at 2445 Winnetka Avenue North, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427.
VIVI-Japan: VIVI-Japan is actively engaged in the development and marketing
of unique applications of Veritec products within Japan and Asia.
VCode: In November 2003, Veritec formed VCode to which it assigned United
States patents 4,924,078, 5,331,176 and 5,612,524, together with all
corresponding patent applications, foreign patents, foreign patent
applications, and all continuations, continuations in part, divisions,
extensions, renewals, reissues and re-examinations thereof. VCode in turn
entered into an Exclusive License Agreement with VData, LLC (VData), an
Illinois limited liability company unrelated to Veritec. The purpose of the
Exclusive Licensing Agreement is to allow VData to pursue enforcement and
licensing of the patents against parties who wrongfully exploit the
technology of such patents. VData is the wholly owned subsidiary of Acacia
Research Corporation (NASDAQ: ACTG) (collectively Acacia). The Exclusive
License Agreement provides that all expenses related to the enforcement and
licensing of the patents will be the responsibility of VData, with the
parties sharing in the net proceeds as specified under the terms of the
agreement, arising from enforcement or licensing of the patents.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Veritec, VIVI-Japan, VIVI-USA and VCode. All inter-company
transactions and balances were eliminated in consolidation.
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing income
(loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share,
in addition to the weighted average determined for basic net income (loss) per
common share, includes potential dilution that could occur if securities or
other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common
stock. Potentially dilutive instruments include stock options and warrants,
preferred stock, and convertible notes payable. For the three months ended March
31, 2005, and the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the stock options
and warrants, preferred stock, and convertible notes payable were antidilutive
and, therefore, were not included in the computations of diluted net loss per
common share.
The weighted average shares outstanding were as follows:
March 31, 2005 March 31, 2004
- -------------------------- --------------------------
Three Months Nine Months Three Months Nine Months
- ------------ ----------- ------------ -----------
15,078,165 9,701,661 7,141,849 7,141,849
6
Diluted net income per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2004,
was computed as follows:
Net income $ 141,048
Interest expense on convertible debt 18,428
-----------
Net income for per share computation $ 159,476
===========
Weighted average shares outstanding 7,141,849
Incremental shares from assumed exercise or conversion
of dilutive instruments:
Options and warrants 76,216
Preferred stock 760,000
Convertible notes payable 7,453,740
-----------
Shares outstanding - diluted 15,431,805
===========
Net income per common share $ 0.01
===========
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company follows the accounting guidance of Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," for measurement and
recognition of stock-based transactions with employees. No compensation cost has
been recognized for options issued under the plans when the exercise price of
the options is at least equal to the fair market value of the common stock at
the date of grant. Had compensation cost for the stock options issued been
determined based on the fair value at the grant date, consistent with the
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,"
the effect on the Company's net income (loss) and net income (loss) per common
share for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, would
have been insignificant.
Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, in December 2004,
which will require the cost of employee compensation paid with equity
instruments to be measured based on grant-date fair values and recognized over
the vesting period. In April 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission
announced the adoption of a new rule that amends the compliance dates for SFAS
No. 123(R). The new rule allows companies to implement SFAS No. 123(R) at the
beginning of their fiscal year that begins after June 15, 2005. Under the new
rule, SFAS No. 123(R) will become effective for the Company on July 1, 2005.
Adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will have no impact on the Company's financial
statements as all options are fully-vested at the adoption date.
Notes Payable - Related Parties
In October 2002, the Company's President, Van Tran, loaned $90,000 to the
Company for working capital. This note was unsecured, bore 10% interest and was
due on demand. Interest expense on this note was $5,144 and $9,000 in 2005 and
2004, respectively. Accrued interest on this note totaled $20,777 at February
28, 2005 and $15,633 at June 30, 2004. The note payable and accrued interest
were converted as a payment towards the prepayment on the subscription
receivable account as of February 28, 2005.
In fiscal years 2003 and 2002, The Matthews Group loaned the Company an
aggregate of $200,000 for working capital. These notes were unsecured, bore 10%
interest and were due May 25, 2003 to June 23, 2003. Interest expense on these
notes totaled $13,334 in 2005 and $20,000 in 2004. Accrued interest on these
notes totaled $42,604 at February 28, 2005 and $29,270 at June 30, 2004. The
notes payable and accrued interest were converted as a payment towards the
prepayment on the subscription receivable account as of February 28, 2005.
In June 2003, Veritec entered into an agreement to purchase The Matthews
Group's 50% ownership of VIVI-USA. As part of this agreement, the Company issued
The Matthews Group a promissory note of $50,000. The promissory note to The
Matthews Group bore interest at 10% and was due June 25, 2004. Interest expense
on this note was $3,333 and $5,000 in 2005 and 2004, respectively. Accrued
interest on this note totaled $8,401 at February 28, 2005 and $5,068 at June 30,
2004. The note payable and accrued interest were converted as a payment towards
the prepayment on the subscription receivable account as of February 28, 2005.
7
In November 2003, a consultant and shareholder of the Company loaned
$50,000 to the Company for working capital. This note was unsecured, bore 10%
interest and was due November 12, 2004. Interest expense on this note totaled
$833 in 2005 (including 2,500 shares of common stock to be issued) and $4,428 in
2004. This note payable and accrued interest totaling $50,833 were repaid in
August 2004. The issuance of the stock remains unsatisfied.
Subscription Receivable
In September 1999, required under its 1997 California bankruptcy plan of
reorganization, The Matthews Group received 275,000 shares of Series H
convertible preferred stock in exchange for a promissory note in the amount of
$2,000,000 (subscription receivable). The promissory note is collateralized by
deeds of trust to real property located in California and Minnesota owned by Van
Tran and Larry Johanns, the sole principals of The Matthews Group. The real
property collateralizing the promissory note has a fair market value in excess
of all encumbrances including the remaining principal balance of the promissory
note to which Veritec is the beneficiary. The promissory note originally
required 108 monthly payments of $18,519. These payments are non-interest
bearing. Imputed interest on the subscription receivable is excluded from
operating results and is instead credited directly to additional paid-in
capital. As the principal amount of the promissory note is reduced, The Matthews
Group has the right to require the Company to release encumbrances against the
real property collateralizing the subscription obligation.
From time to time, The Matthews Group has made prepayments against its
subscription obligation. Prepayments are nonrefundable and noninterest bearing.
In August 2004, Veritec's President Van Tran, contributed deferred compensation
of $84,333 owed to her by the Company toward The Matthews Group's subscription
obligation. In February 2005, the notes and accrued interest of $411,782 payable
to Van Tran and The Matthews Group were converted to the prepayment on the stock
subscription receivable.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2004 condensed consolidated
financial statements to conform to the 2005 presentation. These
reclassifications had no effect on the net income (loss) or net cash flows.
Subsequent Event
In April 2005, the Company discontinued the VIVI-Japan operations due to
continuing losses and the Company's financial condition. Revenues of VIVI-Japan
were $47,863 and $146,369 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively and $191,518 and $382,698 for the nine months ended March 31, 2005
and 2004, respectively. Income (loss) of VIVI-Japan was $(4,820) and $129,908
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively and $(43,746)
and $126,675 for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The loss on disposal of VIVI-Japan in April 2005 was of $44,092.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
This Form 10-QSB contains various "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking
statements represent the Company's expectations and beliefs concerning the
Company's outlook, future economic events, future performance and attainment of
future goals are based on information available to the Company on the date of
the filing of this Form 10-QSB, and are subject to various risks and
uncertainties.
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides "safe harbor"
for forward-looking statements These statements contain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based upon our
current expectations and speak only as of the date hereof. Our actual results
may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking
statements as a result of various factors and uncertainties affecting technology
companies, our ability to successfully develop products, rapid technological
change in our markets, changes in demand for our future products, legislative,
regulatory and competitive developments and general economic conditions. Our SEC
filings discuss some of the important risk factors that may affect our business,
results of operations and financial condition. We undertake no obligation to
revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason unless
otherwise required to do so by SEC Regulations.
8
General
In February 2005, an adverse ruling was made against Veritec and in favor
of Mitsubishi in the amount of $8,174,518 to Mitsubishi and enjoining Veritec
and by extension Veritec's customers from the future use or sale of what was
ruled as Mitsubishi's Error Detection and Correction Technology. This ruling
compelled Veritec to file a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of
the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Minnesota on February 28, 2005.
In February 2006, Veritec and Mitsubishi entered into a Settlement
Agreement whereby Mitsubishi in exchange for the sum of $300,000, a license to
utilize Veritec's patents, and dismissal of the patent infringement litigation
filed by VData and VCode against Mitsubishi, waived its right to the $8,174,518
and licensed Veritec's use of the Mitsubishi Error Detection and Correction
Technology.
In April 2006, Veritec's Third Amended Plan of Reorganization was confirmed
by the Bankruptcy Court. On August 8, 2006, after resolution of all disputed
creditor claims, Veritec received from the Bankruptcy Court an Order and Final
Decree closing the Chapter 11 case in its entirety. Although not reflected in
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in this Form 10-QSB,
Veritec was relieved of $9,356,948 in debt including $7,874,518 owed to
Mitsubishi.
For a more detailed discussion on the bankruptcy proceedings and Veritec's
Third Amended Plan of Reorganization, refer to Note "A" appearing in Part I
"Financial Information", Item I "Financial Statements" and the Form 8-K's
identified as Exhibits hereto and filed with the Commission on February 17,
2005, February 28, 2005, December 19, 2005, March 10, 2006, May 1, 2006, and
August 11, 2006, incorporated by this reference.
Nature of Business
The Company is primarily engaged in the development, marketing, and sales
of a line of microprocessor based encoding and decoding systems that utilize
Matrix Symbology technology, a two-dimensional barcode technology originally
invented by the founders of Veritec under United States patents 4,924,078,
5,331,176 and 5,612,524. The Company's encoding and decoding systems allow a
manufacturer, distributor, reseller or user of products, to create and apply
unique identifiers to the products in the form of a coded symbol. The coded
symbol containing the binary encoded data applied to the product enable
automated manufacturing control, together with identification, tracking, and
collection of data through cameras, readers and scanners also marketed by the
Company. The collected data is then available for contemporaneous verification
or other user definable purposes. Veritec has also developed a Secured
Identification System based upon its proprietary VSCode and VeriCode(R)
Symbology. The Company's Secured Identification System enables the storage of
images, biometric information and data for contemporaneous verification of an
individual's unique identity. In addition to its United States patents, the
Company holds patents in Europe (German Patent No. 69033621.7; French Patent No.
0438841; and Great Britain Patent No. 0438841); and has applications pending
with the United States Patent and Trademark Office for novel uses of its
Multi-Dimensional Matrix Symbology.
The Company also seeks fees from the enforcement and licensing of it
patents under its Exclusive License Agreement with Acacia.
The Company's main products are as follows:
The VeriCode(R)
The VeriCode(R) symbol is a two-dimensional high data density
machine-readable symbol that can contain up to approximately 500 bytes of data
in a small area. The VeriCode(R) symbol is based on a matrix pattern. The matrix
is made up of data cells, which are light and dark contrasting squares. This
part of the symbol looks like a scrambled chessboard. The matrix is enclosed
within at least two solid lines and/or a solid border. Surrounding the solid
border is a quiet zone of empty cells. This simple structure is the basis for
the symbol's space efficiency.
The size of the VeriCode(R) symbol is variable and can be increased or
decreased depending on application requirements. The symbol can be configured to
fit virtually any space. The data capacity of the symbol is also variable. By
using a greater or smaller number of data cells, more or less information can be
stored in the symbol. The main limitation to the size and density of the
VeriCode(R) symbol is the resolution of the marking and reading devices utilized
by the user.
9
Special orientation for reading the symbol is not necessary and is the
basis of the novelty of the Company's 5,612,524 patent. The VeriCode(R) symbol
can be read at high degrees of angularity from vertical, in any direction
relative to the reader. Veritec's symbology and reading software presently
employs "Error Detection and Correction" (EDAC) technology of our own design,
similar to that on music CD's. That means that if a symbol is partially damaged
or obscured, the complete data set stored in the symbol might be recovered. EDAC
lowers the symbol's data capacity, but it can permit data recovery if up to 25%
of the symbol is damaged. With EDAC, the code will return either accurate
information or no information, but it will not return false or wrong
information.
The VeriCode(R) symbol offers high degrees of security and the level of
this security can be specified depending on the user's requirements. For any
specific application or organization, a unique encryption algorithm can be
created so that only authorized persons can create or read a VeriCode(R) symbol
within the user's application.
The VeriCode(R) symbol can hold any form of binary information that can be
digitized including numbers, letters, images and the minutia for biometric
information to the extent of its data storage capacity.
The VSCode
The VSCode is a derivative of the two-dimensional VeriCode(R) symbol. It is
built around the core competencies of the VeriCode(R) symbol which includes the
solid border, omni-directional reading and Error Detection and Correction
capability. The distinguishing factor for the VSCode is its ability to encrypt a
greater amount of data by increasing data density. This matrix can hold up to
approximately 4,151 bytes of data making it ideal for holding identification and
biometric information. The VSCode offers a high degree of security, which can
also be defined by the application requirements of the user.
The VSCode symbol can hold any form of binary information that can be
digitized, including numbers, letters, images, photos, graphics, the minutia for
biometric information, including fingerprints, to the extent of its data storage
capacity, that are likewise limited by the resolution of the marking and reading
devices employed by the user.
VSCode is designed for bankcards and high security applications. Because
the code is encrypted on the card it can be an independent portable database
containing non-duplicative information that is unique to the individual owner of
the bank account or credit card; or, the data can be verified through a central
database while maintaining high security for the card issuer without the need of
a PIN.
The FCR-100 Fingerprint Card Reader
The FCR-100 is a compact fingerprint card reader used to read and decode
the VSCode symbology containing biometric information and other secured data. It
consists of a combination of several modular components, including a quality
camera, lighting mechanism, digital fingerprint reader, software lock, USB cable
and housing, all tied into a PC operating system running the proprietary Veritec
software. Due to its modular design, the FCR-100 can be modified to meet
specific application needs.
The FCR-100 can be designed to work on most PC based operating systems,
including the full suite of Windows(R) operating systems. This allows the
operating system to function with the many different types of VSCode
applications such as bankcards, access control, personnel identification, border
control, and hospital identification cards. The FCR-100 is connected and powered
by a USB cable connection to a PC or server. The FCR-100 can be utilized with
wireless applications and will allow multiple reading stations to be connected
to a single computer.
Licensing Fees
Veritec has long been burdened by having to compete against the technology
learned from its patents by other companies having greater resources and access
to capital markets. The Company has identified numerous companies it believes
uses its technology without license or authorization. Management is confident
that the use of the Company's intellectual property without a license will be
addressed on a case-by-case basis as a result of its relationship with Acacia.
As of March 31, 2005, there were no actual proceeds derived from the efforts of
Acacia. However, as of the filing of this Form 10-QSB the Company received
licensing revenue from Acacia of $1,471,330, of which $57,280, $769,267 and
$644,783 was earned in fiscal years 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Identification card/SEI Acquisition
In October 2006, Veritec entered into an agreement to purchase selected
assets of Secure Environments, Inc. (SEI), a Minnesota corporation that produces
identification cards. The assets acquired consisted of office furniture,
computer equipment, specialty software, security card and badge printers, and a
customer base of 73 small to large commercial and municipal customers, including
security firms and police departments. Terms of the purchase were Veritec's
assumption of $3,900 in debt and a 10% royalty, not to exceed $150,000 in
aggregate, for any future sales by Veritec to the 73 SEI customers. No other
consideration was, or is, to be paid.
10
Results of Operations - March 31, 2005 compared to March 31, 2004
Revenues
Revenues of $1,671,063 for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 increased
by $39,995 or 2.4% higher than for the same period ended March 31, 2004. For the
nine month period ended March 31, 2005, 89% of revenues or $1,479,545 were from
Veritec; and, 11% or $191,518 were from VIVI-Japan. VIVI-Japan had a decline in
sales that reflects the more involved role Veritec has and will continue to take
with regards to making direct sales into the Asian market with the goal of
establishing name recognition for Veritec.
For the three months ended March 31, 2005, revenues of $142,659 decreased
$536,042 or 79% less than the same period ended March 31, 2004. For the three
month period ended March 31, 2005, revenue of $94,796 came from Veritec and,
$47,863 from VIVI-Japan.
The decline in revenues was a result of management's focus on the
bankruptcy and the Mitsubishi litigation. Consequently, Veritec's plans to
introduce new marketing efforts, applications and solutions were delayed.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales of $97,265 for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 decreased
by $127,687 or 57% from the same period in 2004, and decreased 8% as a percent
of sales for the period. The reduction in cost of sales is due to a change in
sales mix with a significant shift to software sales in 2005 which carries a
higher margin as compared to hardware sales which were more dominant in the
sales mix for the period ended in 2004 and prior. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005, cost of sales of $40,923 decreased $12,550 or 23% from the same
period in 2004, and increased 21% as a percent of sales for the same period. The
increase in cost of sales as a percent of sales was due to a decrease in the
higher margin software sales for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
Operating Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses of $534,406 for the three
months ended March 31, 2005, increased by $123,959 or 30% more than the same
period in 2004. This was a result of large legal fees associated with the
bankruptcy and the Mitsubishi lawsuit. For the nine month period ended March 31,
2005, selling, general and administrative expenses of $2,106,645 increased
$621,057 or 42% more than the same period in 2004. Reasons for the increase were
substantially the same as for the three month period.
Research and Development
Research and development expense of $78,877 for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, increased by $36,132 from 2004. For the nine months ended March
31, 2005, research and development expenses of $184,974 increased $31,291, from
the same period in 2004.
Capital Expenditures and Future Commitments
Capital expenditures for the nine months ended March 31, 2005, were
$27,321, of which $23,301 was the purchase of a vehicle. For the nine months
ended March 31, 2004, there were no capital expenditures. Although we continue
to minimize spending for capital expenditures, we believe our need for
additional capital equipment will continue because of the need to develop and
expand our business. The amount of such additional capital is uncertain and may
be beyond that generated from operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company has relied on The Matthews Group for funding. Through November,
2006, The Matthews Group has funded $1,666,082, including prepayments, of the
original of $2,000,000 stock subscription receivable.
11
In February 2005, Veritec filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11
and in August 2006 emerged from bankruptcy. Although not reflected in the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in this Form 10-QSB,
Veritec was relieved of $9,356,948 in debt including $7,874,518 owed to
Mitsubishi.
As of March 31, 2005, the Company had not received any licensing revenue
from its relationship with Acacia but as of the filing of this Form 10-QSB, the
Company has received licensing revenue of $1,471,330.
As of November 13, 2006, the Company had consolidated cash balances of
$1,038,381, which, we believe is sufficient to meet our short-term needs.
However, the Company may need additional capital to continue to develop and
expand.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company has not issued or invested in financial instruments or
derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. The Company did maintain
foreign bank accounts denominated in Japanese Yen in the fiscal quarter of March
31, 2005, but no longer maintains these accounts. The Company is not actively
involved in the trading of foreign currency and fluctuations in currency
exchange rates have had no material impact. Although the Company is involved in
the sales of its products to the Asian markets, all products are priced in
United States Dollars and, as such, sales are not subject to material foreign
currency exchange rate risk.
Item 3. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal
disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end
of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The quarterly review process in fiscal 2005 and the audit of our June 30,
2004 consolidated financial statements revealed a need for stronger controls
over our financial reporting system. Improvements needed related to a general
lack of accounting staff. During the bankruptcy period, the Company utilized a
consultant for its accounting and financial reporting system. As a result,
certain controls were limited. When the Company emerged from bankruptcy, we
responded to these concerns by hiring a full time Chief Financial Officer.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and former Chief
Financial Officer, Van Tran, does not expect that its disclosure controls and
procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter
how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the
inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if
any, within our Company have been detected. The design of any system of controls
also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future
events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving
its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent
limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
During the 1995 - 1997 bankruptcy, the Company sought an investment group
to assist funding the $2,000,000 under the Plan of Reorganization approved by
the Bankruptcy Court in 1997. In the intervening years, various investment
groups attempted to help the Company fund this required investment. Partial
funding received from these investment groups were settled through stock
issuances by the Company. One of these former investment groups made claims
totaling $166,697 against the Company, $90,980 in cash and $75,717 in stock
(94,646 shares at $.80 per share), but has not pursued legal action relating to
these claims. It is possible that other investment groups will assert claims
against the Company regarding their efforts to secure such funding on behalf of
the Company. Management believes it has appropriately reflected the activity
with these investment groups in the accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements. Management further feels these claims were settled in the
bankruptcy. Due to uncertainties, however, it is at least reasonably possible
that claims will be asserted and/or pursued. The ultimate outcome of these
claims, if asserted and/or pursued, cannot presently be determined.
12
On June 30, 2000, we were served as a defendant in the matter of
Starosolsky vs. Veritec, Inc., et al., in the United States District Court for
the Central District of California. This suit was brought by a shareholder and
former director of the Company against Veritec and various individuals claiming
that certain corporate actions were taken without proper authority of the
Company's Board of Directors and/or contrary to the Plan of Reorganization the
Company filed and completed under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy
Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court in the 1990's. The complaint seeks
equitable relief to set aside the issuance of Series H preferred stock (now
converted into common stock) issued to The Matthews Group that was authorized by
the previous approved bankruptcy reorganization plan in 1999, to prevent The
Matthews Group from voting its stock at any meetings of stockholders and to
remove certain of the individual defendants as directors of the Company. In
December 2000, this case was transferred to the United States District Court for
the District of Minnesota. The case has lingered without prosecution.
Consequently, management is not able to express an opinion on the likely
outcome.
On January 10, 2002, Veritec initiated arbitration against Mitsubishi in
Los Angeles, California, alleging breach of contract, trade secret
misappropriation and interference with business opportunities; seeking several
million dollars in compensatory damages, punitive damages, legal fees and
accrued interest. Mitsubishi counterclaimed on similar grounds and sought to
enjoin Veritec's use of the Error Detection and Correction Technology which
Mitsubishi claimed as its sole and separate property. Evidentiary hearings were
conducted from the later part of August through September 4, 2004. On February
15, 2005, Veritec received notice from the International Court of Arbitration
that it awarded Mitsubishi a total of $8,174,518 in monetary damages and
enjoined Veritec's use or sale of the Error Detection and Correction Technology
it deemed to be the sole property of Mitsubishi. As a result, on February 28,
2005, Veritec filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Minnesota. On December 16, 2005, the Bankruptcy Court converted Veritec's
Chapter 11 case in bankruptcy to a Chapter 7 and the Bankruptcy Court ordered
all assets of the Company to be turned over to the control of the Trustee.
In February 2006, Veritec and Mitsubishi entered into a Settlement
Agreement whereby, in exchange for $300,000, a license to utilize Veritec's
VeriCode(R) Technology, and dismissal of the patent infringement litigation
filed by VData and VCode against Mitsubishi, Mitsubishi waived its right to the
$8,174,518 and granted Veritec a license to use the Mitsubishi Error Detection
and Correction Technology. In light of the Settlement Agreement entered into
with Mitsubishi, on March 8, 2006, the Bankruptcy Court ruled in favor of
reconverting Veritec's case in bankruptcy back to one under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code. Veritec's Third Amended Plan of Reorganization was formally
filed with the Court on March 13, 2006. In April 2006, Veritec's Third Amended
Plan of Reorganization was confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court. On August 8, 2006,
after resolution of disputed creditor claims, Veritec received from the
Bankruptcy Court an Order and Final Decree Closing the Chapter 11 case in its
entirety. Although not reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements appearing in this Form 10-QSB, Veritec was relieved of $9,356,948 in
debt including $7,874,518 owed to Mitsubishi.
VCode joined with VData as Plaintiffs in patent enforcement litigation
filed on October 25, 2004, against Adidas America, Inc., Adidas Solomon AG,
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Boston Scientific Corporation, Stamps.com and
Hitachi Global Storage Technologies (Thailand) Ltd., in the United States
District Court for the District of Minnesota. Adidas America, Inc., Advanced
Micro Devices, Inc., Boston Scientific and Stamps.com filed Counterclaims in
those actions. All Defendants have since settled and entered into licensing
agreements for use of the technology under the Company's patents.
VCode joined with VData as Plaintiffs in patent enforcement litigation
filed on September 8, 2005, against Mitsubishi Corporation in the United States
District Court for the District of Minnesota, alleging violations of the
Company's patents. This matter was dismissed as a part of the Settlement
Agreement with Mitsubishi described above.
VCode joined with VData as Plaintiffs in patent enforcement litigation
filed on October 4, 2005, against Brother Industries, Ltd., Sato Corporation,
Toshiba Corporation and US Bank National Association in the United States
District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging violations of the
Company's patents. US Bank National Association has entered into an licensing
agreement with the Company and the case as to that defendant was dismissed as
well as the case against Sato Corporation. No opinion can be rendered at this
time with respect to the outcome of this action as to the remaining defendants.
On January 26, 2006, Hartz Mountain Corporation, in response to a notice of
infringement sent to it by VData, filed a preemptive action seeking a
Declaratory Judgment against VData and the Company in the United States District
Court for the District of New Jersey, Case No. 06-0396 (JAP). Amongst other
remedies the action sought a ruling from the Court that the Company's 4,924,078,
5,331,176 and 5,612,524 patents were not enforceable against Hartz Mountain and
its related
13
companies. The Company has been advised by legal counsel that the preemptive
filing of a Declaratory Judgment action is commonplace in the enforcement areas
of patent law and practice. The Company joined VData with the filing of a cross
complaint against Hartz Mountain seeking amongst other remedies, monetary
damages for past infringement and future use of the knowledge learned from the
Company's patents. Hartz Mountain entered into a licensing agreement with VData
and the Company whereupon Hartz Mountain dismissed its action for Declaratory
Judgment and VData and the Company dismissed their actions against Hartz
Mountain.
On March 13, 2006, in response to notices of infringement sent to their
customers by VData, Cognex Corporation filed a preemptive action seeking a
Declaratory Judgment against VData and the Company in the United States District
Court for the District of Minnesota. Amongst other remedies the action seeks a
ruling from the court that the Company's 5,612,524 patent is not enforceable
against Cognex Corporation and its customers. Presently, the Company is
conferring with VData and the legal counsel retained by VData to defend against
this action. Due to the recent nature of the case, only jurisdictional and
procedural issues have been litigated and a responsive pleading on behalf of
VData and the Company has not yet been filed. The Company cannot render an
opinion at this time with respect to the outcome of these actions.
On March 22, 2006, the United States Patent and Trademark Office granted an
application made for an Ex Parte Reexamination of the Company's 5,612,524
patent. The Company is conferring with VData, and counsel retained by VData, to
file the Company's reply to the applicant's submission. Due to the recent nature
of this matter, a response on behalf of VCode has not been filed with the United
States Patent and Trademark Office. The Company has been advised by legal
counsel that a preemptive filing of such a request for Ex Parte Reexaminations
is commonplace in the enforcement areas of patent law and practice. The Company
is confident in its patent but cannot render an opinion at this time with
respect to the outcome of the reexamination. However, not all claims of the
patent have been challenged and the Company believes that a determination
adverse to the patent would not be detrimental to the Company's ability to
market its products, but could be detrimental to collection of licensing fees
based upon this patent.
On May 23, 2006, VCode joined with VData as a Plaintiff in a pending patent
enforcement litigation filed against Aetna, Inc., PNY Technologies, Inc.,
Merchants' Credit Guide Co., The Allstate Corporation, and American Heritage
Life Insurance Company in the United States District Court for the District of
Minnesota alleging violations of the Company's patents. The Allstate Corporation
and American Heritage Life Insurance Company have entered into a licensing
agreement with the Company and the case as to those defendants have been
dismissed. Aetna, Inc., and Merchants' Credit Guide Co., have filed responsive
pleadings in the action. No opinion can be rendered at this time with respect to
the outcome of this action as to the remaining defendants.
On September 5, 2006, an application was made for an Ex Parte Reexamination
of the Company's 4,924,078 patent. The Company is awaiting a determination from
the United States Patent and Trademark Office if it will grant reexamination on
the Application. The Company has conferred with VData, and the legal counsel
retained by VData, to file the Company's reply to the applicant's submission
should it be granted. Due to the recent nature of this matter, a response on
behalf of VCode is not yet required. The Company is confident in its patent but
cannot render an opinion at this time with respect to the outcome of the
reexamination. However, the Company believes that a determination adverse to the
patent would not be detrimental to the Company's ability to market its products,
but could be detrimental to collection of licensing fees based upon this patent.
SEC Reporting Obligations
We are subject to the continuing reporting obligations of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the 1934 Act), which, among other things, requires the
filing of quarterly and annual reports and proxy materials with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Prior to September 1999 and periodically
thereafter, we did not comply with several filing requirements. To our
knowledge, there is no current inquiry or investigation pending or threatened by
the SEC in connection with our prior reporting violations. However, there can be
no assurance that we will not be subject to such inquiry or investigation in the
future. As a result of any potential or pending inquiry by the SEC or other
regulatory agency, we may be subject to penalties, including among other things,
suspension of trading in our securities, court actions, administrative
proceedings, preclusion from using certain registration forms under the 1933
Act, injunctive relief to prevent future violations and/or criminal prosecution.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risk Factors
Investing in our Company entails substantial risk. In addition to the other
risks and uncertainties discussed herein or available from outside sources, a
number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from the plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested
by forward-looking statements of the Company set forth within the body and
Exhibits hereof include amongst other things:
14
General Factors
We Have a History of Operating Losses
We have a history of operating losses that were a substantial factor in the
Company having been twice placed in bankruptcy. Once from October 1995 through
October 1999 and again from February 2005 through August 2006. To halt the
continuation of these losses, we are developing new products, entering new
markets and developing strategic alliances to grow revenue. There can be no
assurance that we will be successful in these efforts, and even if we are,
whether we can become profitable.
Loss of the Services of Key Employees Could Harm Our Operations
The Company's performance depends on the talents and efforts of our key
management and technical employees. The loss of certain key individuals could
diminish our ability to maintain relationships with current and potential
customers or to meet development and implementation schedules for existing
technology and the technology that the Company intends to introduce in the
future. Our future success also depends on our continuing ability to identify,
hire, train and retain highly qualified technical and managerial personnel. If
we fail to attract or retain these key individuals in the future, our business
could be disrupted.
Continuing Licensing Revenues from Acacia and Intellectual Property
The Company is dependent on Acacia for a significant portion of its revenue. In
the event of an adverse determination either with regard to the Patent
Reexaminations or the Declaratory Judgment being sought by Cognex, our future
ability to obtain licensing fees for the 4,924,078 and 5,612,524 patents could
cease.
In addition to Cognex, future challenges of our intellectual property could be
made by other claimants. Our business would be materially impacted in the event
such claims are raised and ruled against us.
Competition in the Asian Market
The Company currently relies heavily on its sales to the Asian markets. The
cross-licensing agreement we executed with Mitsubishi that allowed for our
emergence from bankruptcy and rights to use of the Mitsubishi Error Detection
and Correction Technology, gave Mitsubishi a license to our VeriCode(R)
Technology that may result in increased competition. Competition in the Machine
Readable Information and symbology sector, coupled with the strain on our
relationships with our licensees and distributors while we were in bankruptcy
may impact future sales.
Dependence on The Matthews Group
The Company has traditionally been dependent on The Matthews Group for its
financial support. Management does not believe additional monies above the stock
subscription obligation will be required in the immediate future. However
additional capital may be required at some future point. The Company cannot
guarantee going forward that The Matthews Group will continue to provide
additional funding.
Ability to Obtain Access to Capital
Due to the Company's prior bankruptcies and history of losses, the Company's
ability to raise funds, whether from lending, selling stock, or other sources,
may be difficult to achieve. The Company may need to raise additional capital
for the development or marketing of new products. If the Company can not raise
such capital, or if the cost of such capital is too high, we may be unable to
successfully develop and launch new products.
Effect of the Bankruptcy
The Company having been in bankruptcy has made it difficult for the Company to
establish new trade credit relationships with both vendors and customers.
Although the Company believes it will restore its credibility going forward, the
lack of trade credit could substantially impair the Company's ability to grow
and implement its plans.
15
Competition
Our VeriCode(R) and VSCode Matrix Symbologies compete with alternative
machine-readable codes such as conventional bar code systems, including UPC, EAN
Code 39 and Code 49; and, alphanumeric systems such as OCR-A, OCR-B, PDF-417,
Data Matrix and many others. Competitors offering alternative symbologies
include numerous well capitalized private and publicly traded companies who
offer a wide variety of bar code systems and solutions, as well as, alternative
product solutions such as Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) and Global
Positioning Satellite (GPS) technology. Our competitors include but are not
limited to: Intermec (NYSE: IN); Siemens Energy and Automation, Inc., a
subsidiary of Siemens AG (NYSE: SI); Symbol Technologies (NYSE: SBL); and, Zebra
Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: ZBRA). These companies have more resources
than the Company, already have a strong customer base, and their products are
widely used in the market place. Competition from such companies may further
reduce the future level of demand for the Company's products and/or the
Company's future margins of profit.
General Conditions Beyond the Companies Control
The general economic condition of the United States and other regions of the
world, work disruptions, labor negotiations both at the Company and with our
licensees and distributors, actions of the U.S. and foreign governments, foreign
currency exchange rate fluctuations, inflation and other economic events all to
varying degrees do, could and would have an effect upon the Company some of
which could be a material adverse impact.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the period
covered by this report.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
A list of exhibits included as part of this Form 10-QSB is set forth in an
Exhibit Index that immediately precedes the exhibits.
Signatures.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized on November 14, 2006.
Veritec, Inc.
/s/ Van Thuy Tran
----------------------------------------
Van Thuy Tran, Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Gerald Fors
----------------------------------------
Gerald Fors, Chief Financial Officer
16
EXHIBIT INDEX
31. CEO/CFO Certification required by Rule 13a14(a)/15d14(a) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
32. Veritec, Inc. Certification of CEO/CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).
*99.1 Press Release issued by the Registrant on February 16, 2005, announcing
the adverse ruling against Veritec, Inc., by the International Court of
Arbitration, awarding a monetary judgment in favor of Mitsubishi
Corporation of approximately $8.1 Million; and, enjoining Veritec from
further violations of Mitsubishi's EDAC copyright (filed as Item 9.01
Exhibit 99.1 to Veritec's Form 8-K filed on February 17, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference)
*99.2 Notice of the Registrant having filed on February 28, 2005, a Petition for
Relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code with the
United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Minnesota (Case Number
05-31119) (filed as Item 1.03 Bankruptcy or Receivership to Veritec's Form
8-K filed February 28, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)
*99.3 Notice of the Registrant's case in Bankruptcy being converted to Chapter 7
of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Case Number 05-31119) (filed as Item
1.03 Bankruptcy or Receivership to Veritec's Form 8-K filed December 19,
2005 and incorporated herein by reference)
*99.4 Notice of the Registrant's case in Bankruptcy being reconverted to Chapter
11of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Case Number 05-31119) (filed as
Item 1.03 Bankruptcy or Receivership to Veritec's Form 8-K filed March 10,
2006 and incorporated herein by reference)
*99.5 Notice of the Registrant's Third Amended Plan of Reorganization being
confirmed by the United States Bankruptcy Court (Case Number 05-31119)
(filed as Item 1.03 Bankruptcy or Receivership and Item 9.01 Financial
Statements with attached Exhibit 2.1 Order and Notice Confirming Plan and
Fixing Time Limits, dated April 26, 2006; Exhibit 2.2 Debtor's Third
Modified Plan of Reorganization with Settlement Agreement; and, Exhibit
99.1 Unaudited balance sheet of registrant at April 26, 2006, to Veritec's
Form 8-K filed May 01, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)
*99.6 Notice of the Registrant's receipt of "Order and Final Decree Closing
Chapter 11 Case" from the United States Bankruptcy Court (Case Number
05-31119) (filed as Item 1.03 Bankruptcy or Receivership and Item 8.01
Other Events identifying the Press Release issued announcing the same, to
Veritec's Form 8-K filed August 11, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference)
With respect to the documents incorporated by reference to this Form
10-QSB, Veritec's Commission File Number is 0-15113.
* As Previously Filed
17