BY FAX AND BY COURIER

June 15, 2007


Ms. April Sifford
Branch Chief
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE
Washington, D.C.
20549-7010

Dear Ms. Sifford:

RE:      FORM 40-F FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
         (FILE NO. 333-90736)

Reference is made to comment regarding the Form 40-F (the "FORM 40-F") of
Western Oil Sands Inc., a Canadian corporation (the "COMPANY"), for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006 received from the Staff (the "Staff") of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "COMMISSION") in a letter from the
Division of Corporation Finance, dated June 5, 2007 (the "SECOND COMMENT
LETTER"). This letter is our response to the Second Comment Letter. We have
reproduced the comment for ease of reference. Capitalized terms not defined in
this letter are used as defined in the Form 40-F.

The Company's response to the Staff's comment is as follows:

FORM 40-F FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006

10 ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION, PAGE 11

1.       WE HAVE REVIEWED YOUR RESPONSE TO COMMENT 1 OF OUR LETTER DATED MAY 3,
         2007. THE BASIS FOR THE REVISION TO THE ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION
         AMOUNT DURING THE FISCAL YEAR 2006 REMAINS UNCLEAR. WE UNDERSTAND THAT
         OF THE $10.3 MILLION REVISION AMOUNT, APPROXIMATELY $6.3 MILLION
         RELATES TO INCREASES IN INFLATION RATE ESTIMATES AND APPROXIMATELY
         $4.0 MILLION RELATES TO CHANGES IN THE TIMING OF RECLAMATION
         ACTIVITIES. HOWEVER, YOUR RESPONSE DID NOT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS WHAT
         FACTORS OCCURRED DURING FISCAL YEAR 2006 WHICH CAUSED YOU TO CONCLUDE
         A REVISION OF INFLATION RATE ESTIMATES WAS REQUIRED. IN ADDITION, YOUR
         RESPONSE DID NOT IDENTIFY THE PREVIOUS ESTIMATED TIMING OF RECLAMATION
         ACTIVITIES AS COMPARED TO THE NEW ESTIMATED TIMING AND WHAT EVENT
         OTHER THAN A REVIEW OF THE MINE PLAN BY THE AOSP ENGINEERS CAUSED THE
         DATES TO CHANGE. PLEASE PROVIDE US WITH THIS INFORMATION TO DETERMINE
         WHAT NEW INFORMATION WAS IDENTIFIED DURING FISCAL YEAR 2006 TO JUSTIFY
         A SIGNIFICANT REVISION TO PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AMOUNTS. IN YOUR
         RESPONSE, PLEASE ADDRESS WHY YOU BELIEVE THIS REVISION TO MORE THAN
         DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF THE ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION RECORDED AS OF
         DECEMBER 31, 2005 SHOULD BE CONSIDERED A CHANGE OF ESTIMATE VERSUS A
         CORRECTION OF AN ERROR.

                                                                              1


RESPONSE TO COMMENT 1:

Inflation Factors:

     As indicated in our response dated May 23, 2007, high industry activity,
     demand for goods and services in Alberta as well as strong WTI prices
     during fiscal year 2006 affected our estimates of inflation used in
     calculating the asset retirement obligation. Increased inflation was
     pervasive across Alberta, particularly in Calgary and the Fort McMurray
     region where the Athabasca Oil Sands Project ("AOSP") is located.
     Inflationary factors were fueled by supply and demand imbalance for goods
     and services particularly in the oil sands sector. Specific factors
     supporting this review of the inflation used in the asset retirement
     obligation were as follows:

     o    As discussed in the Company's press releases dated July 5 and 28,
          2006 related to anticipated costs for Expansion 1 of the AOSP, the
          AOSP completed an extensive feasibility study in 2006 followed by a
          rigorous cost estimate and assurance review process. As a result of
          this review, which took into consideration the inflationary market
          for labour, materials and equipment, the cost estimates associated
          with Expansion 1 were increased by approximately 50 per cent from
          those that were previously anticipated.

     o    Other large, capital intensive projects in the Ft. McMurray region
          announced or warned of cost overruns as a result of the active oil
          sands environment, and the strong demand for labour and associated
          costs. These projects include:

          o    Nexen Inc. and Opti Canada Inc.'s Long Lake Project;

          o    Synenco Energy Inc.'s Northern Lights Project; and

          o    UTS Energy Corporation, Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc. and Teck
               Cominco Limited's Fort Hills Project.

Timing of Reclamation Activities:

          Previously, the Company estimated reclamation activities to occur
          between 2007 to 2035 and this timing has not changed significantly.
          However, during 2006, the timing of future activities within this
          period has shifted as a result of the changes to the mine plan. As
          indicated in our response dated May 23, 2007, a review of the mine
          plan was completed by the AOSP engineers, re-evaluating the timing of
          reclamation activities and the estimated cost of the reclamation of
          the land disturbed in our mining operations. The mine plan is
          regularly reviewed to incorporate new information from operational
          experience and derived from activities such as core sampling or
          drilling. As the AOSP commenced operations in late 2002 to early 2003
          and has ramped up production steadily each year thereafter, the AOSP
          owners and engineers have been able to either validate or modify the
          assumptions made in earlier mine plans. These assumptions are
          modified to optimize resource recovery through mining and processing
          activities. These modifications can result in consequential changes
          to the timing of future reclamation activities, including those
          mentioned in our response dated May 23, 2007. For example,
          operational experience caused a change to the specific assumption
          around the estimated useful life of the tailings pond, which impacts
          the estimated timing of its reclamation.

                                                                              2


For the Company to calculate asset retirement obligation it must estimate both
inflation and the timing of when reclamation activities are going to take
place. Due to the long period in which reclamation activities are expected to
occur, approximately over 30 years, a change in inflation or expected timing
can have a significant impact to our estimate of asset retirement obligation. A
change in either inflation or estimated timing based upon a review of new
information such as described in this letter is therefore seen as a change in
estimate and not a correction of an error.

If you have any questions concerning the above responses, please do not
hesitate to contact the undersigned at (403) 233-1707.


Yours truly,

WESTERN OIL SANDS INC.



/s/ David A. Dyck
------------------------------
David A. Dyck
Senior Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer