United States
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
----------------------
Form 10-Q
(X) Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1999
Or
( ) Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
For the transition period from ______ to ______
Commission File Number 33-14582
PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS II, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 13-3437420
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
1285 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10019
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 713-2000
-----------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
-----------------
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe
harbor" for forward-looking statements. Except for the historical information
contained herein, the matters discussed herein are forward-looking statements.
Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements
of PaineWebber R&D Partners II, L.P. or industry results to be materially
different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others,
the following: general economic and business conditions; fluctuations in the
value of securities for which only a limited, or no, public market exists;
dependence on the development of new technologies; dependence on timely
development and introduction of new and competitively priced products; the need
for regulatory approvals; the Sponsor Companies (hereinafter defined) having
insufficient funds to commercialize products to their maximum potential; the
restructuring of Sponsor Companies; the dependence of PaineWebber R&D Partners
II, L.P. on the skills of certain scientific personnel; and the dependence of
PaineWebber R&D Partners II, L.P. on the General Partner (hereinafter defined).
PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS II, L.P.
(a Delaware Limited Partnership)
Form 10-Q
June 30, 1999
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Page
Item 1. Financial Statements
Statements of Financial Condition (unaudited) at 2
June 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998
Statements of Operations
(unaudited) for the three months and six months
ended June 30 1999 and 1998 3
Statement of Changes in Partners' Capital
(unaudited) for the six months ended
June 30, 1999 4
Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited) for the six months ended
June 30, 1999 and 1998 5
Notes to Financial Statements
(unaudited) 6-11
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial 12-13
Condition and Results of Operations
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 14
Item 5. Other Information 14
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 14
Signatures 15
All schedules are omitted either because they are not applicable or the
information required to be submitted has been included in the financial
statements or notes thereto.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS II, L.P.
(A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(unaudited)
June 30, December 31,
1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assets:
Cash $ 6,998 $ 6,998
Marketable securities, at market value 3,298,233 1,433,536
Royalty income receivable 1,700,000 1,425,514
========== ==========
Total assets $5,005,231 $2,866,048
========== ==========
Liabilities and partners' capital:
Accrued liabilities $ 103,342 $ 78,994
Partners' capital 4,901,889 2,787,054
========== ==========
Total liabilities and partners' capital $5,005,231 $2,866,048
========== ==========
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See notes to financial statements.
2
PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS II, L.P.
(A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
For the three months ended June 30, 1999 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenues:
Interest income $ 3,759 $ 15,188
Income from product development projects 1,740,002 1,238,444
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of
marketable securities 1,320,000 (1,455,000)
----------- -----------
3,063,761 (201,368)
----------- -----------
Expenses:
General and administrative costs 58,188 45,016
----------- -----------
58,188 45,016
----------- -----------
Net income (loss) $ 3,005,573 $ (246,384)
=========== ===========
Net income (loss) per partnership unit:
Limited partners (based on 8,257 units) $ 360.36 $ (29.54)
General partner $ 30,055.73 $ (2,463.84)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the six months ended June 30, 1999 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenues:
Interest income $ 7,460 $ 22,726
Income from product development projects 3,262,912 3,665,239
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of
marketable securities 1,949,998 (2,265,000)
Realized gain (loss) on sale of
marketable securities -- (1,939)
----------- -----------
5,220,370 1,421,026
----------- -----------
Expenses:
General and administrative costs 128,011 92,464
----------- -----------
128,011 92,464
----------- -----------
Net income $ 5,092,359 $ 1,328,562
=========== ===========
Net income per partnership unit:
Limited partners (based on 8,257 units) $ 610.57 $ 159.29
General partner $ 50,923.59 $ 13,285.62
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See notes to financial statements.
3
PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS II, L.P.
(A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(unaudited)
Limited General
For the six months ended June 30, 1999 Partners Partner Total
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at January 1, 1999 $ 2,755,101 $ 31,953 $ 2,787,054
Net income 5,041,435 50,924 5,092,359
Cash distribution to partners (2,947,749) (29,775) (2,977,524)
=========== =========== ===========
Balance at June 30, 1999 $ 4,848,787 $ 53,102 $ 4,901,889
=========== =========== ===========
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See notes to financial statements.
4
PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS II, L.P.
(A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
For the six months ended June 30, 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 5,092,359 $ 1,328,562
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash
provided by operating activities:
Unrealized (appreciation) depreciation of
marketable securities (1,949,998) 2,265,000
Decrease (increase) in operating assets:
Marketable securities 85,301 98,770
Royalty income receivable (274,486) (118,686)
Other assets -- 1,933
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
Accrued liabilities 24,348 (30,908)
----------- -----------
Cash provided by operating activities 2,977,524 3,544,671
----------- -----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Distributions to partners (2,977,524) (3,544,671)
----------- -----------
Increase in cash -- --
Cash at beginning of period 6,998 6,998
----------- -----------
Cash at end of period $ 6,998 $ 6,998
=========== ===========
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
The Partnership paid no cash for interest or taxes during the six months ended
June 30, 1999 and 1998.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See notes to financial statements.
5
PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS II, L.P.
(a Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Business
The financial information as of and for the periods ended June 30, 1999
and 1998 is unaudited. However, in the opinion of management of PaineWebber R&D
Partners II, L.P. (the "Partnership"), such information includes all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair
presentation. The results of operations reported for the interim periods ended
June 30, 1999, are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the
year ended December 31, 1999. These financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the most recent annual report of the Partnership on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998 and the previously issued quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999.
The Partnership is a Delaware limited partnership that commenced
operations on September 30, 1987 with a total of $72.0 million available for
investment. PWDC Holding Company (the "Manager") is the general partner of
PaineWebber Technologies II, L.P. (the "General Partner"), which is the general
partner of the Partnership. PWDC Holding Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Paine Webber Development Corporation ("PWDC"), an indirect, wholly-owned
subsidiary of Paine Webber Group Inc. ("PWG"). The Partnership will terminate on
December 31, 2012, unless its term is extended or reduced by the General
Partner.
The principal objective of the Partnership has been to provide long-term
capital appreciation to investors through investing in the development and
commercialization of new products with technology companies ("Sponsor
Companies"), which have been expected to address significant market
opportunities. The Partnership has been engaged in diverse product development
projects (the "Projects") including product development contracts, participation
in other partnerships and investments in securities of the Sponsor Companies.
Once the product development phase has been completed, the Sponsor Companies
have had the option to license and commercialize the products resulting from the
product development project, and the Partnership has had the right to receive
payments based upon the sale of such products.
6
PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS II, L.P.
(a Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(Note 1 Continued)
All distributions to the limited partners of the Partnership (the "Limited
Partners") and the General Partner (collectively, the "Partners") from the
Partnership have been made pro rata in accordance with their respective capital
contributions. The following table sets forth the proportion of each
distribution to be received by the Limited Partners and the General Partner,
respectively:
Limited
Partners General Partner
-------- ---------------
I. Until the value of the aggregate
distributions for each limited
partnership unit ("Unit") equals
$10,000 plus simple interest on
such amount accrued at 7% per annum
for each Unit sold at the Initial
Closing (6% per annum for each
subsequent Unit sold up to the
5,000th Unit and 5% per annum for
each Unit sold thereafter)
("Contribution Payout"). At June
30, 1999, Contribution Payout
ranged from $15,000 per Unit to
$18,225 per Unit....................... 99% 1%
II. After Contribution Payout and until
the value of the aggregate
distributions for each Unit equals
$50,000 ("Final Payout")............... 80% 20%
III. After Final Payout..................... 75% 25%
For the three months ended June 30, 1999, the Partnership made cash
distributions totaling $1,517,954 ($182 per Unit; $15,180 to the General
Partner). At June 30, 1999, the Partnership has made cash and security
distributions, as valued on the dates of distribution, since inception of $3,689
and $7,206 per Unit, respectively.
Profits and losses of the Partnership are allocated as follows: (i) until
cumulative profits and losses for each Unit equals Contribution Payout, 99% to
Limited Partners and 1% to the General Partner, (ii) after Contribution Payout
and until cumulative profits and losses for each Unit equals Final Payout, 80%
to Limited Partners and 20% to the General Partner, and (iii) after Final
Payout, 75% to Limited Partners and 25% to the General Partner. As of June 30,
1999, the cumulative losses for the Partnership were $963 per Unit.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The financial statements are prepared in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles which require management to make certain
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Marketable securities consist of a money market fund and common stock
which are recorded at market value. Marketable securities are not considered
cash equivalents for the Statements of Cash Flows.
7
PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS II, L.P.
(a Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(Note 2 Continued)
Realized and unrealized gains or losses are determined on a specific
identification method and are reflected in the Statements of Operations during
the period in which the change in value occurs.
The Partnership has invested in product development contracts with Sponsor
Companies either directly or through product development limited partnerships.
The Partnership expenses product development costs when incurred by the Sponsor
Companies and such costs are reflected as expenditures under product development
projects in the accompanying Statements of Operations. Income received and/or
accrued from investments in Projects is reflected in the Statements of
Operations for the period in which the income is earned.
3. Marketable Securities
The Partnership held the following marketable securities:
June 30, 1999 December 31, 1998
----------------------- -----------------------
Market Cost Market Cost
Money market fund $ 178,233 $ 178,233 $ 263,534 $ 263,534
Cygnus, Inc.
(240,000 common shares) 3,120,000 2,376,000 1,170,002 2,376,000
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
$3,298,233 $2,554,233 $1,433,536 $2,639,534
========== ========== ========== ==========
The market value of Cygnus, Inc. ("Cygnus") stock as of June 30, 1999, was
$13.00 per share as compared to a market value of $7.50 per share and $4.875 per
share as of March 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998, respectively. Accordingly, the
Partnership recognized unrealized appreciation on its Cygnus shares of
$1,320,000 and $1,949,998 for the three months and six months ended June 30,
1999. The market value of Cygnus stock as of June 30, 1998, was $10.4375 per
share as compared to a market value of $16.50 and $19.875 per share as of March
31, 1998 and December 31, 1997, respectively. Accordingly, the Partnership
recognized unrealized depreciation on its Cygnus shares of $1,455,000 and
$2,265,000 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 1998,
respectively.
4. Related Party Transactions
The Manager is entitled to receive a management fee for services rendered
to the Partnership. Commencing July 1, 1996, the Manager elected to discontinue
the management fee charged to the Partnership.
The money market fund invested in by the Partnership is managed by an
affiliate of PaineWebber Incorporated ("PWI").
8
PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS II, L.P.
(a Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(Note 4 Continued)
PWDC and PWI, and its affiliates, have acted in an investment banking
capacity for several of the Sponsor Companies. In addition, PWDC and its
affiliates have direct limited partnership interests in some of the same
Projects as the Partnership.
5. Product Development Projects
Of the Partnership's ten original Projects, three are ongoing or have had
current activity: Centocor Partners III, L.P. ("CP III"); Genzyme Development
Partners, L.P.; and Synergen Clinical Partners, L.P. ("SCP").
In January 1998, the class action against the general partner of SCP and
others alleging that the defendants caused or permitted the release of
misleading statements regarding the potential market for Interleukin-Receptor
Antagonist ("IL-1ra") (a potential treatment of inflammatory diseases),
preclinical and clinical trial results, and the possibility of IL-1ra becoming
licensed for sale either in the United States or Europe reached a settlement
which was approved by the court. On March 3, 1998, the Partnership received and
recorded as income the amount of $1,248,624 representing its share of the
initial settlement payment as a Class A limited partner of SCP.
On January 31, 1997, pursuant to the provisions of the Partnership
Purchase Option Agreement between Centocor and the Partnership, Centocor
exercised its option to purchase the limited partnership interests of CP III,
including those owned by the Partnership. The Partnership is entitled to receive
future quarterly payments based on sales of ReoPro, a drug developed by CP III.
The Partnership accrued income from CP III of $1,700,000 and $1,220,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively. For the six months
ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, the Partnership received and/or accrued income
from CP III in the amount of $3,256,609 and $2,404,711 respectively.
If the Projects produce any product for commercial sale, the Sponsor
Companies have had the option to enter into joint ventures or royalty agreements
with the Partnership to manufacture and market the products developed. In
addition, the Sponsor Companies have had the option to purchase the
Partnership's interest in the technology.
6. Income Taxes
The Partnership is not subject to federal, state or local income taxes.
Accordingly, the individual Partners are required to report their distributive
shares of realized income and loss on their individual federal and state income
tax returns.
7. Legal Proceeding
On July 12, 1995, the Partnership commenced a derivative action against
Centocor and Centocor Development Corporation III ("CDC III") in the Chancery
Court of Delaware (the "Court") arising from certain agreements entered into by
Centocor and Eli Lilly & Company ("Lilly") in July 1992. The Partnership's
complaint alleges, among other things that: at least $25 million of the $100
million paid by
9
PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS II, L.P.
(a Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(Note 7 Continued)
Lilly to Centocor represents profits from the sale of ReoPro, a Centocor drug,
that Centocor is required to share with CP III; and because of the Lilly
transaction, Centocor was required to increase the percentages of profits and
revenues from ReoPro that it pays to CP III investors. Centocor had taken the
position that only $500,000 of the $100 million had to be shared with CP III and
that Centocor had no obligation to increase the percentages of ReoPro profits
and revenues that it pays to CP III investors. The Partnership sought to proceed
on behalf of CP III. The complaint seeks to require Centocor and CDC III to pay
damages to CP III and to increase the percentages of future ReoPro profits and
revenues that Centocor must pay to CP III and its investors.
Centocor answered the Partnership's complaint, as well as a similar
complaint filed by John E. Abdo, another limited partner of CP III, denying the
material allegations of those complaints and asserting purported affirmative
defenses and third-party claims against PWG, PWDC and PWI.
In April and July 1996, Mr. Abdo moved to amend his complaint to assert
claims on behalf of CP III against two of PWDC's nominees to the CDC III Board
of Directors. On July 12, 1996, counsel chosen by Centocor to represent CP III
moved to disqualify the Partnership from serving as a plaintiff in this action,
alleging that Mr. Abdo should be the sole plaintiff because the Partnership has
conflicts of interest with CP III and its other limited partners, including
conflicts arising out of the alleged claims against the PWDC nominees. Mr. Abdo
and Centocor also moved to disqualify the Partnership. In January 1997, the
Court granted, in part, Mr. Abdo's motion to amend his complaint to assert
claims against the PWDC nominees. The Court has not ruled on the motions to
disqualify.
In June 1997, the parties to the Partnership's action entered into an
agreement to settle the action. The agreement provides, among other things, for
Centocor to pay to CP III investors (including the Partnership, a former limited
partner in CP III) in the aggregate: $10.8 million, net of attorneys' fees and
expenses as may be awarded by the Court; an additional $5.0 million, if and when
cumulative world-wide sales of ReoPro exceed $600 million; and possible
additional payments totaling $2.2 million, depending upon regulatory
developments in Japan. The Partnership will only receive its allocable share of
these latter amounts if, and when, payments under the agreement are remitted by
Centocor.
The agreement further provides for revisions to the ReoPro royalties
payable by Centocor to CP III investors through 2007. Under the agreement, those
royalties would be paid based on revenues from end-sales by Lilly and other
distributors, as opposed to Centocor's revenues on its sales to distributors.
For 1997 and 1998, Centocor would pay an aggregate of 6.5% of the first $175
million of United States end-sale revenues, 3.25% of such revenues above $175
million, and 3.25% of foreign end-sales revenues. For 1999 through 2007,
Centocor would pay an aggregate of 6.5% of the first $250 million of United
States end-sale revenues, 4% of such revenues above $250 million, and 3.25% of
foreign end-sales revenues. The agreement provides that investors will not
receive less than Centocor would otherwise have paid based on Centocor's sales
of ReoPro. As of June 30, 1999, the Partnership has not accrued income related
to the settlement.
10
PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS II, L.P.
(a Delaware Limited Partnership)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(Note 7 Continued)
On June 27, 1997, the Court entered an order: preliminarily approving the
settlement; providing for notice to a class consisting of all holders of CP III
Class A and C limited partnership interests as of the close of business on
January 31, 1997, and all holders of CP III Class B limited partnership
interests as of the close of business on May 31, 1997, and their transferees,
successors, and assigns, other than defendants; and designating the
Partnership's counsel as counsel for the class.
Mr. Abdo and Pharmaceutical Partners, L.P., another former limited partner
of CP III, objected to the proposed settlement. They asserted, among other
things, that the consideration is inadequate and that the proposed allocations
of the consideration among the classes of former limited partners of CP III
improperly favors the Partnership. On September 4, 1997, the Court held a
hearing on the objections and reserved decision. On March 15, 1999, the Court
issued a memorandum opinion and order overruling the objections and approving
the settlement as fair and reasonable.
PWDC has been advancing the funds necessary to pay the Partnership's legal
fees and expenses relating to this litigation. On April 8, 1999, counsel for the
Partnership applied to the Court for an award of fees and expenses in the amount
of $1.5 million. On May 21, 1999, counsel for the objectors applied for an award
of fees and expenses in the same amount (see Note 8 - Subsequent Event). It is
anticipated that: the net proceeds of any recovery will be distributed to the
limited partners of CP III, including the Partnership, on a pro rata basis; the
Partnership and/or its counsel will reimburse PWDC; and any remaining
Partnership proceeds will be distributed to the Partners of the Partnership in
accordance with the distribution criteria outlined in Note 1.
8. Subsequent Event
On July 19, 1999, counsel for the objectors in the CP III litigation (Note
7) reduced their application for fees and expenses from $1,500,000 to $900,000
and the parties agreed not to oppose the application.
11
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Partners' capital increased from $2.8 million at December 31, 1998, to
$4.9 million at June 30, 1999, resulting from the recognition of net income of
$5.1 million (as more fully explained in Results of Operations below) offset by
a cash distribution to the Partners of $3.0 million for the six months ended
June 30, 1999.
The Partnership's funds are invested in a money market fund and
marketable securities until cash is needed to pay for the ongoing management and
administrative expenses of the Partnership or upon the remittance of cash
distributions to the Partners. Liquid assets increased from $1.4 million at
December 31, 1998 to $3.3 million at June 30, 1999 resulting from an increase in
the market value of securities held as of these dates.
Results of Operations
Three months ended June 30, 1999 compared to the three months ended June 30,
1998
Net income (loss) for the quarters ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 was
$3.0 million and $(0.2) million, respectively. The favorable change of $3.2
million was a result of an increase in revenues of this amount.
Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 were $3.0
million and $(0.2) million, respectively. The increase of $3.2 million was due
primarily to an increase of $0.5 million in income from product development
projects and a favorable change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of
marketable securities of $2.7 million. Income from product development projects
for the three months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 was $1.7 million and $1.2
million, respectively, resulting primarily from the Partnership's accrual of
income due as a former limited partner of CP III. Unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) of marketable securities for the three months ended June 30, 1999
and 1998 was $1.3 million and $(1.4) million, respectively, resulting from the
Partnership's investment of 0.24 million shares of Cygnus. The market value of
the shares increased from $7.50 per share as of March 31, 1999 to $13.00 per
share at June 30, 1999. At June 30, 1998, the market value of the shares was
$10.4375 per share as compared to $16.50 per share at March 31, 1998.
There were no material variances in expenses for the three months ended
June 30, 1999 as compared to the same period in 1998.
12
(Item 2 Continued)
Six months ended June 30, 1999 compared to the six months ended June 30, 1998
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 was $5.1
million and $1.3 million, respectively. The favorable variance of $3.8 million
resulted from an increase in revenues of this amount.
Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 were $5.2
million and $1.4 million, respectively. The increase of $3.8 million resulted
from a decrease in income from product development projects of $0.4 million
offset by a favorable change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of
marketable securtities of $4.2 million. Income from product development projects
for the six months ended June 30, 1999 was $3.3 million resulting primarily from
its investment as a former limited partner of CP III. During this same period in
1998, the Partnership received and/or accrued income from CP III of $2.4
million. Also during this period, the Partnership recognized income from its
investment in SCP in the amount of $1.2 million representing its share of the
initial settlement payment received as a Class A limited partners of SCP.
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments and marketable securities
for the six months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 was $1.9 million and $(2.3)
million, respectively. The market value of the Partnership's investment in 0.24
million shares of Cygnus increased from $4.875 per share as of December 31, 1998
to $13.00 per share as June 30, 1999. The market value of the shares decreased
from $19.875 per share as of December 31, 1997 to $10.4375 per share at June 30,
1998.
There were no material variances in expenses for the six months ended
June 30, 1999 as compared to the same period in 1998.
Year 2000
The Year 2000 Issue is the result of computer programs being written
using two digits rather than four to define the applicable year. Calculations
performed with these abbreviated date fields may misinterpret the Year 2000 as
1900 resulting in erroneous calculations or program failures. Currently, the
Partnership utilizes computer programs, through services provided by a
third-party servicing agent, that can adversely affect the Partnership's
operations if they are not Year 2000 compliant. The servicing agent has informed
the Partnership that it has been executing a plan to modify or replace
significant applications as necessary to ensure Year 2000 compliance.
Programming changes and final testing were completed by June 30, 1999.
Conversion of databases was also completed by June 30, 1999. Incremental costs
associated with the development and implementation of the above plan have been,
and will continue to be, borne by the servicing agent. The status of the
Partnership's investments in Sponsor Companies could be adversely affected if
the computer systems of the Sponsor Companies are not Year 2000 compliant. Based
on the recent public disclosures of those Sponsor Companies in which the
Partnership has investments of value, the Sponsor Companies have stated that
they have undertaken programs to insure Year 2000 compliance. As of the dates of
disclosure, these Sponsor Companies have stated that they do not expect the Year
2000 Issue will adversely effect their future financial condition. However, they
cannot provide assurances that unanticipated problems and costs will not arise.
To date, the Partnership has no contingency plan in place but intends to
evaluate the status of the Year 2000 Issue with third parties in September 1999
to determine whether such a plan is necessary.
13
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Action Against Centocor, Inc. and Centocor Development Corporation III.
Information regarding this action was disclosed on the Partnership's
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 1999. On April 8, 1999 counsel for the Partnership
applied to the Court for an award of fees and expenses in the amount of
$1.5 million. On May 21, 1999, counsel for the objectors applied for an
award of fees and expenses in the same amount which was reduced on July 19,
1999 to $900,000. The parties agreed not to oppose the application.
Item 5. Other Information.
On March 3, 1999, PharmaInvest, L.L.C., on behalf of Pharmaceutical
Royalties, L.L.C. and Pharmaceutical Royalty Investments Ltd.
(collectively, the "Purchasers") commenced a tender offer to purchase (the
"Tender Offer") up to 3,000 Units of the Partnership at a cash price per
Unit of $6,000 subject to reduction for certain distributions. The Tender
Offer expired on March 31, 1999 with 762.5 Units being tendered. As of
August 15, 1999, the Purchasers and their affiliates own 28.12% of the
total Units.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
a) Exhibits:
None
b) Reports on Form 8-K:
None
14
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this 16th day of
August 1999.
PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS II, L.P.
By: PaineWebber Technologies II, L.P.
(General Partner)
By: PWDC Holding Company
(general partner of the General Partner)
By: /s/ Dhananjay M. Pai
--------------------
Dhananjay M. Pai
President*
By: /s/ Anthony M. DiIorio
----------------------
Anthony M. DiIorio
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer*
* The capacities listed are with respect to PWDC Holding Company, the Manager,
as well as PWDC, the parent company of the Manager.
15