1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K [ x ] Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the fiscal year ended July 31, 1998 [ ] Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from ____ to ___ Commission file number: 0-22974 CMC INDUSTRIES, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE 62-1434910 (State of incorporation) (IRS Employer Identification No.) 4950 PATRICK HENRY DRIVE, SANTA CLARA, CA 95054 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (408) 982-9999 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None. Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.01 par value per share Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [ X ] Yes [ ] No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K [ ] State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant: $18,629,507 at October 9, 1998. Shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value per shares outstanding at September 30, 1998: 7,593,556 DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Documents incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K into which the document is incorporated: Portions of the Proxy Statement relating to the 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Part III Portions of the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders: Part II, Part IV (2) 2 PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS CMC, Industries, Inc. ("CMC" or the "Company") together with its predecessor business, has been a manufacturer of telecommunications systems and equipment for over 30 years. The Company was incorporated in 1990 to acquire from Alcatel Network Systems, Inc. ("Alcatel"), certain businesses operated from 1960 to 1987 by ITT and from 1987 to 1990 by Alcatel, n.v., a joint venture between ITT and Compagnie Generale d'Electricite. In August 1993, the Company transferred certain assets and related liabilities associated with its telecommunications business to Cortelco Systems Holding Corp. ("Cortelco") in exchange for 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock of Cortelco. These transactions effectively transferred to Cortelco all of the Company's assets and liabilities not related to its electronic manufacturing business. The Company has provided independent electronic manufacturing services to a diverse base of customers in both the telecommunications and computer electronics industries. The Company manufactures a wide range of products for its customers including sophisticated telecommunications equipment, personal computers, computer peripherals and subassemblies and printed circuit board ("PCB") assemblies. CMC provides a broad spectrum of manufacturing services primarily based on the manufacture of PCB assemblies utilizing automated pin-through-hole technology ("PTH"), surface mount technology ("SMT") and ball grid array ("BGA") placement techniques. PTH technology involves the attachment of electronic components to a PCB by inserting the leads of the components through holes in the board and soldering the leads on the underside of the board. SMT and BGA technologies involve the attachment of electronic components directly to the surface of the board, and accordingly permits components to be mounted on each side of the board. In addition, the Company provides full systems integration assembly and test, materials procurement, distribution, product design and engineering support services. The Company has manufacturing facilities in Corinth, Mississippi, Santa Clara, California (Silicon Valley) and Hermosillo, Mexico. The Company believes that these locations enable it to meet the cost and geographic distribution requirements of its customers. The Company's major customers currently include RELTEC Corporation ("RELTEC"), Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. ("Diamond"), Next Level Communications ("Next Level"), Logitech, Inc., Harris Corporation, Premisys Communications, Inc. ("Premisys"), Midway Games, Inc. ("Midway"), IBM Corporation and Cortelco. CUSTOMERS AND MARKETING Telecommunications products have been manufactured at CMC's facility in Corinth, Mississippi for over 30 years. From 1960 to 1987, the operations at Corinth were owned and operated by ITT, which established a reputation for quality manufacturing of telecommunications products and services to its customers. The Company believes the telecommunications manufacturing expertise that it has acquired over three decades is a competitive strength, allowing it to meet customer requirements for strict quality control, prompt turnaround and flexible response to design changes. Capitalizing on this expertise, the Company has expanded into the manufacture of computer equipment and related peripherals and data networking equipment. The Company is seeking to leverage its capacity and manufacturing expertise by expanding sales to new customers with products that are similar to its current customer base in the telecommunications, data communications, computer-related products and value-added electronics industries. In addition, the Company seeks to position its manufacturing operations at strategic sites throughout the United States and worldwide. Corinth, Mississippi is located in close proximity to major North American freight hub locations, allowing for inexpensive ground transport and overnight air delivery throughout the country. The Company's California facility is located in Santa Clara, in the heart of Silicon Valley, the site of many of the Company's current and potential customers. During 1998, the Company added a manufacturing operation in Hermosillo, Mexico, an international procurement office in Taipei, Taiwan and a sales and procurement office in Huntsville, Alabama. Hermosillo offers an attractive cost structure and solid logistics for current and prospective customers and the location between two leading technical universities within the city provides access to a pool of qualified engineers and technicians. The Asian Procurement office in Taiwan and corporate procurement office in Huntsville, Alabama were established to increase access to low cost materials throughout a product's life cycle. CMC provides electronic manufacturing services to major telecommunications OEMs as well as suppliers of computer monitors, computer peripherals, data networking equipment and other electronic components. In turn, CMC's customers sell these manufactured products into domestic and worldwide markets. Products manufactured by the Company include telephones, ISDN equipment, key and PBX/ACD systems, various data communications products and telecommunications switching equipment and printed circuit board assemblies for computer and communications 2 3 equipment. Services provided include design for manufacturability and test, materials procurement, prototyping, plastic injection molding, printed circuit board assembly, full board-level test, system integration and configuration, full system test, packaging, distribution and field return and repair support. Generally, relationships between the Company and its customers for the manufacture of product and related services are defined by a succession of purchase orders placed by the customer and performed upon by CMC. The Company offers electronic manufacturing services to its customers on both a turnkey and consignment basis, with over 90% of the Company's net sales derived from turnkey projects. In turnkey relationships, the Company both procures components and other supplies and provides full manufacturing services. In consignment relationships, the customer purchases and then provides components and other supplies to the Company, and the Company charges for only labor and overhead. The establishment of a turnkey relationship requires significant investment of resources by both an OEM customer and a contract manufacturer. An OEM customer must incur expense to qualify a contract manufacturer by certifying the quality of the manufacturer's processes and services and, in some cases, must also qualify a contract manufacturer's sources of component supply. The OEM customer also works with a contract manufacturer to refine product design and manufacturing processes in order to optimize manufacturability. The Company believes that OEM customers seek to establish relationships with turnkey manufacturing partners they perceive will be able to meet their production requirements over a long period of time and for successive product generations. The Company believes that these relationships, once established, tend to be sustaining in nature due to the significant investment of time and resources by both the Company and the OEM customer. Accordingly, the Company believes that its emphasis on turnkey manufacturing results in greater stability of its customer base. However, the Company's results of operations have been in the past and may be in the future materially adversely affected in the event customers for whom the Company manufactures products should cancel or reschedule their existing and forecast orders. Such cancellations or rescheduling could result in inefficient utilization of equipment and personnel dedicated to the manufacture of the specific products. Moreover, because of such stability, the Company may be unable to secure turnkey manufacturing projects from new OEM customers working with competitors of the Company. The failure of the Company to develop relationships with new OEM customers also may materially and adversely affect the Company's results of operations. CMC develops and maintains customer relationships through the efforts of the Company's management team, direct sales force, program managers and project engineers. Project engineers and program managers receive extensive training in the Company's manufacturing and service capabilities in order to respond to the specific needs of customers. CMC's project engineers work with the customers' engineers and technical personnel to ensure a close working relationship and understanding of the specific needs of each customer. The Company's four largest customers in fiscal 1998 and their respective percentages of CMC's net sales for 1998 and 1997, respectively, were as follows: Micron Electronics ("Micron"), 24% and 21%; RELTEC, 12% and 11%; Global Village Communications ("Global Village"), 11% and 14% and Diamond, 9% and 2%. The Company is currently recognizing revenues from Diamond at an annualized rate of approximately $50 million, which is less than originally expected. During the past 18 months, the Company initiated business with a number of new customers, including Premisys, Midway and Next Level. As previously disclosed, the Company's manufacturing relationship with Micron was discontinued at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 1998. Following Global Village's sale of its modem business to Boca Research, Inc. ("Boca") in June 1998, manufacturing of products for Boca has declined to minimal levels The Company derives revenues primarily from OEM arrangements which prohibit the selling of the products manufactured to anyone other than the OEM customer. As a result, the Company does not typically allow its customers to return products, other than for repairs of defective materials. In such cases, the Company charges the customer for the repair unless the defect resulted from faulty manufacturing and occurred within an applicable warranty period. This policy applies to both affiliated and non-affiliated customers. It has been the Company's experience that orders for production of a given product or product line typically decline over time as the customer's product or product line matures. Generally, the Company has customers with products at various stages in the product life cycles including development, volume production and end-of-life production. In the event that the Company is unable to compensate for any material reduction in sales of a given product over time through production of replacement or new products for the customer or through new business with alternative customers, the Company's revenues and operating results could be materially adversely affected. 3 4 MANUFACTURING Manufacturing Services The Company's vertically-integrated turnkey manufacturing services include component procurement and testing, PCB assembly using SMT, PTH and BGA techniques, post-assembly PCB testing, in-circuit test development, full system integration and test, and product design and engineering support services. The Company provides a complete, vertically-integrated manufacturing solution with manufacturing capabilities as diverse as plastic injection molding, final unit assembly and testing. The Company delivers finished products to the OEM or, if requested, delivers products directly to the OEMs' customers. The Company offers comprehensive and advanced manufacturing solutions to its customers. The Company's broad range of manufacturing capabilities includes both automated PTH and more advanced SMT processes, including BGA assemblies. The Company offers vertical services such as component procurement, test, product design, and other engineering services. Accordingly, the Company's production processes can accommodate the manufacture of a broad range of communications and electronics components and products. While the Company continually seeks to improve the flexibility of its production systems, the commencement of production of new products typically involves startup costs, lower yields and other inefficiencies. Achievement of volume production for a new product typically requires a period as short as several days for products substantially similar to those previously manufactured by the Company, to as many as several months for completely new products. Since turnkey manufacturing may be a substitute for all or a portion of a customer's in-house manufacturing capability, continuous technical and administrative communication between the Company and its customer is required. CMC establishes a close relationship with each OEM customer in the early stages of product development to assist the customer in the evaluation of board designs and thereby improve manufacturability and testability. Building on this knowledge, CMC's technical staff monitors manufacturing process yields and may propose engineering changes for product improvement and cost reductions. Certain of the products manufactured by CMC are in the early stages of their life cycles and may therefore have ongoing design or engineering changes. The Company believes a critical element of turnkey manufacturing services is the ability to respond rapidly to engineering design changes. The Company believes that its history in design and manufacturing, particularly in the telecommunications industry, and its close working knowledge of its customers' products enables the Company to meet its customers' needs effectively. A key element in turnkey manufacturing services is the procurement of materials, which consists of the planning, purchasing, expediting, warehousing and financing of the components and other materials required to assemble a PCB or system-level assembly. OEMs increasingly have required contract manufacturers to purchase all or some components directly from component manufacturers or distributors and to warehouse and finance the components and materials. The Company orders materials and components based on purchase orders received and accepted and seeks to minimize its inventory of materials or components that are not identified for use in filling specific orders. Electronic components are purchased directly by the Company and, in certain circumstances, the Company bears the risk of component price fluctuations. The electronics industry has been characterized by shortages from time to time of microprocessors and other semiconductor components, which shortages have led to allocations by third-party suppliers. These delays to date have not had a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. If component shortages occur, the Company may not be able to secure quantities required to fulfill orders, which could result in delays in shipments, cancellation or delays in orders, or losses resulting from price increases by suppliers of parts or components, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. CMC provides complete turnkey manufacturing solutions for its customers from its vertically-integrated 350,000 square foot facility in Corinth, Mississippi and its 75,000 square foot facility in Santa Clara, California and from a new 110,000 square foot facility in Hermosillo, Mexico. The Company provides full SMT assembly as well as complete system integration, test and box-build capabilities at each location. Manufacturing Processes CMC manufactures for its customers a wide variety of complex and technologically advanced products that require a coordinated manufacturing process. The process requires the application of advanced manufacturing technologies 4 5 and computerized in-circuit, functional and system testing techniques. Current processes at CMC include fine-pitch SMT, PTH, BGA and system box-build assemblies. CMC seeks to add product lines that require advanced technological processes, in order to further develop its manufacturing expertise. Company employees regularly attend training seminars on the latest developments in manufacturing technologies. In PTH production, components are attached by pins (also called "leads") inserted through and soldered to plated holes in the PCB. In SMT production, the leads on integrated circuits and other electronic components are soldered to the surface of the PCB rather than inserted into holes. SMT can accommodate a substantially higher number of leads in a given area than PTH, thereby permitting the PCB to interconnect a greater density of integrated circuits, which permits tighter component spacing and a reduction in the PCB dimensions. Additionally, SMT allows components to be placed on both sides of the PCB, thereby permitting even greater density. The substantially finer lead-to-lead spacing or "pitch" in SMT requires a manufacturing process far more exacting than the PTH interconnect products. Because of their high number of leads, most very large scale integrated circuits are configured for SMT production. SMT components are constantly changing, with BGA becoming the package selection of many component manufacturers. The BGA assembly process uses small balls of solder (instead of leads that could bend and break), located directly underneath the part, to interconnect the component and circuit board. X-ray equipment is instrumental in the development of BGA process parameters, since the balls are located underneath the component and are not visible through standard inspection techniques. The Company utilizes a computerized material requirements planning system to direct the flow of materials through the manufacturing cycle. Printed circuit board assemblies with PTH components are assembled using automatic insertion machines for all eligible components, including axial, dual inline package, radial and square-wire pins, which for most products allows over 90% of the total PTH components to be automatically inserted. Manually assembled components are either purchased or prepared in-house to allow for "drop-in" assembly on a moving assembly conveyor that feeds the PCB assemblies directly into an automated soldering system that solders the pins to the PCB. For SMT printed circuit assemblies, CMC has full capability to run either "top-side," "bottom-side" or "mixed-technology" PCB assemblies. Equipment capabilities include screen-printing with vision and computer-controlled alignment; high-speed, in-line epoxy dispensing; surface-mount component placement with speeds up to 44,500 components per hour per machine; assembly of fine-pitch components and computer-controlled infrared reflow soldering. The Company subjects assembled and soldered boards to board-level in-circuit and functional testing. As part of the final unit assembly process, the Company also functionally tests all products to verify conformance to customer specifications. If desired, product testing can include burn-in at elevated temperatures utilizing the Company's in-house burn-in chambers. Printed circuit boards utilized for telecommunication systems receive final system tests to verify the functional integrity of each system. Quality The Company believes that the quality of its manufacturing and customer services is critical to customer satisfaction and long-term success. CMC has emphasized the pursuit of high quality for many years. From 1960 to 1987, CMC's Corinth facility was part of ITT, which pioneered many quality improvement processes. Many of CMC's manufacturing and customer support personnel were trained in quality principles and practices as employees of ITT. CMC's quality assurance engineers have for many years received training through in-house programs and by attending seminars, including enrollment in The ITT Quality College. The Company has achieved ISO 9001 certification at its Mississippi facility and ISO 9002 certification at its California facility. The Company believes that the process of attaining ISO certification serves as an excellent tool for quality improvement, enabling the Company to provide consistency and excellence in its products and services. Also, since certain potential customers prefer or require manufacturers to have achieved ISO certification, such certification may offer certain competitive advantages. The Company believes that compliance with ISO will allow it to expand its bid opportunities, especially with customers who participate in world-wide markets. In addition to ISO certification, the Mississippi facility has achieved certification to British Approval Board for Telecommunications (BABT). Achieving BABT certification broadens CMC's opportunities with telecommunication customers by providing manufacturing solutions that meet the United Kingdom national requirements or Common Technical Regulations under Directive 91/263/EEC. 5 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS The Company is subject to a variety of regulations concerning environmental laws related to the use, storage, discharge and disposal of hazardous chemicals utilized during the manufacturing process and constantly monitors its operations to avoid violations. Although the Company believes that its facilities are currently in compliance with applicable environmental laws, there can be no assurance that violations have not occurred and will not occur. In the event of any violations of environmental laws, the Company could be held liable for damages and for the costs of remedial actions and could also be subject to revocation of its effluent discharge permits. Any such revocation could require the Company to cease or limit production, thereby having a material adverse impact on the Company's business and results of operations. To date, environmental regulations have not restricted the Company's ability to operate or expand its manufacturing operations or caused the Company to incur significant expense. Environmental laws, however, could become more stringent over time, imposing greater compliance costs and increasing risks and penalties associated with a violation. See "Legal Proceedings." COMPETITION The electronics manufacturing services industry is highly competitive. Competitive manufacturing services are available from many independent sources as well as in-house manufacturing operations of current and potential customers. In addition, certain large electronics manufacturers are transforming existing manufacturing facilities into contract manufacturing operations. The Company also competes with foreign contract manufacturers which, due to lower cost of labor, have become significant competitors with respect to high volume products or those with a high labor content. The Company believes that its primary competitors are Solectron Corporation, Avex, Inc., Flextronics International Ltd., Jabil Circuit, Inc., and SCI Systems, Inc. CMC believes that the primary competitive issues in the markets in which it focuses are quality of manufacturing processes, surface mount capacity and total production capacity, responsiveness to customer needs, price, quality, reliable delivery and financial resources. CMC believes that it competes favorably with respect to most of these factors. However, certain of the Company's competitors have greater SMT and total production capacity and greater financial resources than the Company. In addition, certain overseas competitors are able to offer low-cost production for certain types of products, particularly those which require a higher labor content. To remain competitive, the Company must continue to expand its advanced manufacturing technologies, provide superior quality and service, and be price competitive. In addition, the Company's new manufacturing facility in Hermosillo, Mexico is an effort to expand manufacturing capacity while reducing costs. If the Company were to become unable to compete effectively in terms of quality, delivery, advanced manufacturing, service or price, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. BACKLOG The Company's backlog was approximately $42.1 million at July 31, 1998 and $56.9 million at July 31, 1997. Backlog consists of purchase orders received by the Company primarily for shipment within 180 days. Cancellation and postponement of purchase orders occasionally occur, and the Company negotiates charges to such customers that vary depending on the timing and circumstances of the cancellation or postponement. Because of possible rescheduling and cancellation, backlog does not necessarily reflect future sales levels. PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS The Company owns four patents related to telephone equipment, but does not believe that patent or trademark protection is an important competitive factor in its market. EMPLOYEES At July 31, 1998, the Company had 1,205 full time employees and 197 temporary employees. At such date, the Company had 1,086 hourly employees and 316 salaried employees, including 863 in manufacturing, 299 in manufacturing support, 128 in engineering and quality, 38 in sales and marketing, and 74 in general and administrative. The only 6 7 employees of the Company represented by a labor union are those employees in its Mexico operation, and the Company has never experienced a work stoppage or strike. The Company believes its relationships with its employees are good. FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT THE COMPANY The foregoing discussion of the Company's business, operations and competitive position contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain of the risk factors set forth below and elsewhere in this document. In addition to the other information contained and incorporated by reference in this document, the following factors should be considered carefully in evaluating the Company and its business. Potential Fluctuations in Operating Results. The Company's operating results are affected by a number of factors, including the timing and mix of manufacturing projects, capacity utilization, price competition, the degree of automation that can be used in the assembly process, the efficiencies that can be achieved by the Company in managing inventories and fixed assets, the timing of orders from customers, fluctuations in demand for customer products, the timing of expenditures in anticipation of increased sales, customer product delivery requirements, increased costs and shortages of components or labor and economic conditions generally. All of these factors can cause substantial fluctuations in the Company's operating results. The Company's expenditures (including, but not limited to, equipment, inventory and labor) are based, in part, on its expectations as to future revenues and, to a large extent, are fixed in the short term. Accordingly, the Company has in the past and may in the future be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected shortfall in revenues, and any significant shortfall of demand in relation to the Company's expectations or any material delay or cancellation of customer orders could have an almost immediate material adverse effect on the Company's operating results. As a result, it is possible that in some future period, the Company's operating results could fail to meet the expectations of public market analysts or investors. In such events, or in the event that adverse conditions prevail or are perceived to prevail generally or with respect to the Company's business, the trading price of Company's Common Stock could drop significantly. The Company's gross profit as a percentage of sales in future periods may be materially adversely affected by various factors associated with the Company's production of new product lines, acquisition of new manufacturing equipment and continued dependence on turnkey contracts (and the inventory risks inherent therein). Expansion of capacity will result in a higher fixed cost structure which will require increased revenue and/or significant improvements in operating efficiencies in order to maintain historical gross margins. Additionally, the commencement of production of new products typically involves significant startup costs, lower yields and other inefficiencies. New products do not generate gross margins as high as products which have been in volume production for several months. The Company also expects that competition may continue to intensify, which could also result in lower gross margins. Customer Concentration; Dependence on Industry Trends. A small number of customers are currently responsible for a significant portion of the Company's net sales. In the fiscal years ended July 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, the Company's four largest customers in such periods accounted for approximately 56%, 61%, and 63%, respectively, of consolidated net sales. Sales to Micron Electronics, Inc. accounted for approximately 24% and 21% of the Company's revenues for the fiscal years ended July 31, 1998 and July 31, 1997, respectively. As previously disclosed, the relationship with Micron has been discontinued and the Company's business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected by such discontinuation in future quarters. Any material delay, cancellation or reduction of orders from these or other customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. The percentage of the Company's sales to its major customers may fluctuate from period to period. Significant reductions in sales to any of these customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. In addition, customer contracts can be canceled and volume levels can be materially changed or delayed. The timely replacement of canceled, delayed or reduced contracts with new business cannot be assured. These risks are exacerbated because the Company's sales are to customers in segments of the electronics industry subject to rapid technological change and product obsolescence. The factors affecting these industries in general, or any of the Company's major customers in particular, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. Relationship with Cortelco. The Company has had numerous transactions with its former affiliate and customer, Cortelco Systems Holding Corp. ("Cortelco"). Mr. Lee, a director of the Company, is also a director of Cortelco, and is the 7 8 largest stockholder of each of the Company and Cortelco. Transactions between the Company and Cortelco include the transfer of certain assets and related liabilities associated with the telephone business to Cortelco in exchange for 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock of Cortelco in August 1993 and the execution of an agreement to provide certain products and related support services to customers of Cortelco. The Company has the right to require that the Preferred Stock be redeemed by Cortelco beginning on August 1, 1999 in five annual installments of $2.5 million each. There can be no assurances that such payments will be made by Cortelco on a timely basis, if at all. Historically, Cortelco has not been as current as other customers in making payments on its trade accounts with the Company. In July 1998, the Company converted certain older accounts receivable from Cortelco totaling $2.0 million into a note receivable. Under the terms of the note, Cortelco has agreed to pay the balance over a three-year term with monthly payments of $50,000, plus interest and a final installment of $200,000 due at the end of the three-year period. Interest accrues on the note at a rate of 9.0% per annum. The Company continues to provide credit for manufacturing services sold to Cortelco in the form of trade receivables, and as of September 30, 1998, had approximately $4,430,000 in trade receivables from Cortelco. Cortelco's payments on its trade accounts with the Company have in the past been late, and there can be no assurances that such payments or payments on the note will in the future be made on a timely basis, if at all. Competition. The electronics manufacturing services industry is comprised of a large number of companies, several of which have achieved substantial market share. The Company also faces competition from current and prospective customers, which evaluate the Company's capabilities against the merits of manufacturing products internally. The Company competes with different companies depending on the type of service or geographic area. Certain of the Company's competitors have broader geographic breadth. They also may have greater manufacturing, financial, research and development and marketing resources than the Company. The Company believes that the primary basis of competition in its targeted markets is manufacturing technology, quality, responsiveness, and the provision of value-added services and price. To be competitive, the Company must provide technologically advanced manufacturing services, high product quality levels, flexible delivery schedules and reliable delivery of finished products on a timely and price competitive basis. The Company currently may be at a competitive disadvantage as to price when compared to manufacturers with lower cost structures, particularly with respect to manufacturers with established facilities where labor costs are lower. Shortages of Electronics Components. Most of the Company's net sales are derived from turnkey manufacturing services in which the Company procures components from third-party suppliers and bears the risk of component shortages. The electronics industry has been characterized by shortages from time to time in semiconductor and other components, which shortages have led to allocations by third-party suppliers. The Company's inability to procure desired supplies of certain components has in the past led, and may in the future lead, to some delays in shipments by the Company to its customers. These delays to date have not had a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. If these component shortages persist or intensify, however, the Company may not be able to secure quantities required to fulfill customer orders, which could result in delays in shipments, or cancellation or delays in customer orders, each of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. Management of Growth. There can be no assurance that the Company will successfully manage the integration of new business and the growth, if any, of the Company's operations. In addition, the Company may experience certain inefficiencies as it manages geographically dispersed operations. Should the Company increase its expenditures in anticipation of a future level of sales which does not materialize, its results of operations could be materially adversely affected. On occasion, customers may require rapid increases in production which can place an excessive burden on the Company's resources. There can be no assurance that the Company will be capable of meeting the demands placed upon the Company's resources by these or any other customers. Environmental Compliance. The Company is subject to a variety of environmental regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge and disposal of hazardous chemicals used during its manufacturing process. Any failure by the Company to comply with present and future regulations could subject it to future liabilities or the suspension of production. In addition, such regulations could restrict the Company's ability to expand its facilities or could require the Company to acquire costly equipment or to incur other significant expenses to comply with environmental regulations. In this regard, see "Legal Proceedings." Risk of Defects. The electronics products manufactured for customers by the Company are highly complex and may at times contain undetected design and/or manufacturing errors or failures. Such defects have been discovered in the past, and there can be no assurance that, despite the Company's quality control and quality assurance efforts, such defects 8 9 will not occur in the future. If such defects occur in quantities or too frequently, the Company's business and operating results may be materially and adversely affected. Dependence on Key Personnel and Skilled Employees. The Company's continued success depends to a large extent upon the efforts and abilities of key managerial and technical employees. The loss of services of certain key personnel could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company's business also depends upon its ability to continue to attract and retain senior managers and sales representatives and other skilled employees. Failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations. Possible Volatility of Market Price of Common Stock. The trading price of the Company's Common Stock is subject to significant fluctuations in response to variations in quarterly operating results, general conditions in the electronics manufacturing services industry as well as the industries of the Company's customers, and other factors. In addition, the stock market is subject to price and volume fluctuations which affect the market price for many high technology companies in particular, and which may or may not be unrelated to operating performance. There can be no assurance as to the trading price of the Company's Common Stock at any time in the future. 9 10 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES. The Company's principal facility is a 350,000 square foot manufacturing plant located on sixty-four acres in Corinth, Mississippi. The plant and land are leased at the rate of approximately seven thousand dollars annually, pursuant to a lease with the Industrial Development Board of Alcorn County, Mississippi, with options to renew the lease until 2060. The Company also leases a 75,000 square foot facility in Santa Clara, California, 20,000 square feet of warehouse space in Corinth, Mississippi, an international purchasing office in Taiwan and a sales and procurement office in Huntsville, Alabama. The Company owns a 4.4-acre track of land in Hermosillo, Mexico and an 110,000 square foot manufacturing facility located thereon. Although there are currently no specific plans for further expansion, the Company continually evaluates customer needs and market opportunities to expand its facilities geographically. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. The Company is involved from time to time in litigation incidental to its business. Management believes that the outcome of current litigation will not have a material adverse effect upon the results of operations or financial condition of the Company and will not disrupt the normal operations of the Company. In December 1993, the Company retained the services of an industrial safety consultant to assist in quantifying the potential exposure to the Company in connection with clean-up and related costs of a former manufacturing site, commonly known as the ITT Telecommunications site in Milan, Tennessee and more particularly described as a 50.1 acre tract surveyed by Construction Layout Service of Milan, Tennessee. The consultant initially estimated that the cost to remove the contaminated soil and deliver it to an appropriate hazardous waste site would be approximately $200,000. Based upon this advice, the Company subsequently entered into a voluntary agreement to investigate the site with the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation. In addition, the Company agreed to reimburse a tenant of the site $115,000 for expenditures previously incurred to investigate environmental conditions at the site. The Company recorded a total provision of $320,000 based on these estimates. In fiscal 1995, an environmental expert concluded that the cost of a full study combined with short and long-term remediation of the site may cost between $3 and $4 million. During fiscal 1996, the State of Tennessee's Department of Environment and Conservation named certain potentially responsible parties ("PRPs") in relation to the former facility. The Company was not named as a PRP. However, Alcatel, Inc., a PRP named by the State of Tennessee's Department of Environment and Conservation and a former owner of the Company, is seeking indemnification from the Company. To date, Alcatel has not filed any legal proceedings to enforce its indemnification claim. However, there can be no assurance that Alcatel will not initiate such proceedings or that any other third parties will not assert claims against the Company relating to remediation of the site. In the event any such proceedings are initiated or any such claim is made, the Company believes it has numerous defenses which it will vigorously assert. There can be no assurance that if any proceedings are initiated or any such claim is asserted, defense or resolution of such matter will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations. In connection with a fiscal 1996 staff reduction, certain terminated employees subsequently claimed that the Company had engaged in age discrimination in their dismissal and sought damages of varying amounts. The Company defended the actual and threatened claims vigorously during fiscal 1998 incurring approximately $275,000 in legal costs over the course of the year. On August 6, 1998, a judgment was rendered in the favor of one plaintiff in the amount of $127,000 which the Company is reviewing for possible appeal. A second plaintiff's claim for $53,000 has also been filed. The EEOC has negotiated with the Company to reach a monetary settlement for other potential claimants. Without admitting any liability, the Company has agreed to enter into a Conciliation Agreement with the EEOC and pay approximately $500,000 to settle all such claims and limit future litigation costs. As a result of these events and the significant ongoing costs to defend these claims, in October 1998, the Company concluded that its interest would be best served to settle all such matters. The Company has reserved $975,000 to resolve all such claims, which represents its best estimate of funds to ultimately be paid to such claimants. This charge has been recorded as of July 31, 1998. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS None. 10 11 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS. On December 9, 1993, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared effective the Company's Registration Statement with respect to an initial public offering of 1,750,000 shares of Common Stock. The Common Stock is listed on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "CMCI." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sale prices for the Company's Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market. Such prices represent prices between dealers and do not include retail mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions and may not represent actual transactions. High Low ---- --- Fiscal Year 1998: - ----------------- First quarter $ 11.13 $ 6.38 Second quarter 14.18 5.75 Third quarter 11.75 8.38 Fourth quarter 10.00 6.63 Fiscal Year 1997: - ----------------- First quarter 8.88 5.63 Second quarter 12.63 7.88 Third quarter 13.50 5.50 Fourth quarter 9.13 6.25 There were approximately 220 holders of record of the Common Stock as of September 30, 1998. The Company believes it had in excess of 1,000 beneficial shareholders as of September 30, 1998. The Company had 7,593,556 shares outstanding as of September 30, 1998. The Company has not paid any cash dividends and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA. The Company's Selected Financial Data is hereby incorporated by reference to page 8 of its 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders. Excerpts of such Annual Report are filed as Exhibit 13.1 hereto. ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION. The Company's Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation is hereby incorporated by reference to pages 9 through 17 of its 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders. Excerpts of such Annual Report are filed as Exhibit 13.1 hereto. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. The information set forth in the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in excerpts of the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference. An index to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements is set forth at Part IV, Item 14(2) at page 13. The selected quarterly financial data set forth under the caption "Quarterly Results" at page 11 of excerpts of the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated herein by this reference. 11 12 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. None. PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT. Information with respect to the directors and executive officers of the Company is incorporated by reference from the Company's Proxy Statement relating to the 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Such Proxy Statement has been filed previously with the Securities and Exchange Commission. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. Certain information relating to executive compensation included in the Proxy Statement relating to the 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference. Such Proxy Statement has been filed previously with the Securities and Exchange Commission. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT. Certain information relating to stock ownership included in the Proxy Statement relating to the 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference. Such Proxy Statement has been filed previously with the Securities and Exchange Commission. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS. Certain information relating to transactions with management included in the Proxy Statement relating to the 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference. Such Proxy Statement has been filed previously with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 12 13 PART IV ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. (1) EXHIBITS Exhibit Description Number ----------- [S] [C] 3.1* Restated Certificate of Incorporation. 3.2* Amended and Restated Bylaws. 4.1* Form of Common Stock Certificate. 4.2*** Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 15, 1996, by and between the Company and each of the investors listed therein. 10.1* Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between CMC Industries, Inc. and International Telecommunication Asia PTE, Ltd. dated as of October 2, 1993. 10.2* Lease Agreement between The Board of Supervisors of Alcorn County, Mississippi and International Telephone and Telegraph Corp. dated August 1, 1961, as amended and supplemented and related documents. 10.3* Lease Agreement between Corinth Telecommunications Corp. (now known as CMC Manufacturing, Inc.) and Douglas Jumper and Truitt Stockton d/b/a Jumper-Stockton Warehouses for the Pinecrest Road warehouse dated October 20, 1992. 10.4* Lease Agreement between Corinth Telecommunications Corp. (now known as CMC Manufacturing, Inc.) and Douglas Jumper and Truitt Stockton d/b/a/ Jumper-Stockton Warehouses for the Sawyers Road warehouse dated October 20, 1992. 10.5(1) Loan and Security Agreement dated September 26, 1996 (and Amendments) among CMC Industries, Inc., CMC California, Inc., and CMC Mississippi, Inc. and Bank of America Illinois and related documents. 10.6* License Agreement between ITT Corporation and ITT Telecom Products Corporation (now known as CMC Manufacturing, Inc.) dated December 30, 1986. 10.7* Agreement between Cortelco International, Inc. and CMC Manufacturing, Inc. dated as of September 1, 1993. 10.8* Cortelco USA, Inc. (now known as CMC Manufacturing, Inc.) Profit Sharing Savings Plan and Trust for Salaried Employees. 10.9* Hourly Pension Plan for Employees of ITT Telecom Products Corporation (now known as CMC Manufacturing, Inc.) at Corinth. 10.10**** CMC Industries, Inc. 1990 Equity Incentive Plan, amended and restated as of November 15, 1996. 10.11* Form of Indemnification Agreement between CMC Industries, Inc. and certain officers and directors. 10.12** Lease Agreement between Guzik Investments, L.P. and CMC Industries dated June 14, 1995. 10.13**** CMC Industries, Inc. 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. 10.14***** Executive Employment Agreement between CMC Industries, Inc. and Jack O'Rear dated August 1, 1997. 13.1 Excerpts from the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders. 21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant. 23.1 Consent of Independent Accountants. 27.1 Financial Data Schedule (For SEC electronic filing purposes only) * Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1, Registration No. 33-70126. ** Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 1995. *** Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 24, 1996. **** Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 22, 1996. ***** Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 1997. (1) FILED BY AMENDMENT 13 14 (2) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES Consolidated Financial Statements of CMC Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 31, 1998 and 1997 Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended July 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 Consolidated Statements of Changes In Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended July 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended July 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Report of Independent Accountants The Financial Statements are hereby incorporated by reference to pages 18 to 35 of the Company's 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders. Excerpts of such Annual Report are filed as Exhibit 13.1 hereto. All schedules specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission are inapplicable or omitted pursuant to Regulation S-X since the information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or related notes. (3) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended July 31, 1998. 14 15 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. CMC INDUSTRIES, INC. /s/ Matthew G. Landa ------------------------------ Date: October 28, 1998 Matthew G. Landa, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Title Date --------- ----- ---- /s/ David S. Lee Chairman of the Board October 28, 1998 - ----------------------------- David S. Lee /s/ Matthew G. Landa President, Chief Executive October 28, 1998 - ------------------------------ Officer and Director Matthew G. Landa /s/ Andrew J. Moley Executive Vice President, October 28, 1998 - ------------------------------ Chief Financial Officer and Andrew J. Moley Director /s/ Ira Coron Director October 28, 1998 - ------------------------------ Ira Coron /s/ Frederick W. Gibbs Director October 28, 1998 - ------------------------------ Frederick W. Gibbs Director - ------------------------------ Charles Holloway /s/ Richard M. Moley Director October 28, 1998 - ------------------------------ Richard M. Moley /s/ M. Kenneth Oshman Director October 28, 1998 - ------------------------------ M. Kenneth Oshman 15