SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12
Arizona Public Service Company
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5) Total fee paid:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
1) Amount previously paid:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2) Form, Schedule or Registration No.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
3) Filing party:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
4) Date filed:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona Public Service Company
P.O. BOX 53999
PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85072-3999
NOTICE AND PROXY STATEMENT
For Annual Meeting of Shareholders To Be Held On
Tuesday, May 20, 1997
To the Shareholders:
The seventy-seventh annual meeting of shareholders of Arizona Public
Service Company will be held in the offices of the Company at 400 North Fifth
Street in Phoenix, Arizona at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, May 20, 1997 for the
following purposes:
1) To elect a Board of Directors to serve for the ensuing year or until
their successors are elected and qualified; and
2) To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting
or any adjournment thereof.
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of
proxies on behalf of the Company's Board of Directors. So far as management is
aware, the matters described in this Proxy Statement will be the only ones to be
acted upon at the meeting. If any other matters properly come before the meeting
or any adjournment thereof, the proxy committee named in the enclosed proxy will
vote on those matters in accordance with its judgment.
Shareholders are requested to mark, date, sign and mail promptly the
enclosed proxy. A postage-paid envelope is provided for mailing in the United
States. You are entitled to revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised
and vote your shares in person if you attend the meeting.
The management of the Company cordially invites you to attend the meeting.
By order of the Board of Directors
NANCY C. LOFTIN
Vice President, Chief Legal
Counsel and Secretary
Approximate date of mailing to shareholders:
April 1, 1997
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
It is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy to vote for
the nominees listed below to serve as members of the Board of Directors until
the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are elected
and qualified. If, between the mailing of this Proxy Statement and the meeting
date, any such individual becomes unavailable to serve, the proxies may be voted
for a person properly nominated or the number of directors to be elected will be
reduced. The following information has been furnished by the respective nominees
as of March 12, 1997. The term "Pinnacle West" refers to Pinnacle West Capital
Corporation, the Company's parent.
Nominees
O. Mark DeMichele, 63, has been a director since 1982. From 1988 until his
retirement in February 1997, Mr. DeMichele was the Company's President and Chief
Executive Officer.
Martha O. Hesse, 54, has been a director since 1991. She is President of Hesse
Gas Company. In 1990 Ms. Hesse served as Senior Vice President of First Chicago
Corporation (financial services), and from 1986 to 1989 she was Chairman of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. She is also a director of Pinnacle West,
Mutual Trust Life Insurance Company and Laidlaw Inc.
Marianne Moody Jennings, 43, has been a director since March 1987. She is a
Professor of Legal and Ethical Studies in Business at the College of Business,
Arizona State University. In addition, Ms. Jennings is a textbook author, and
since 1977 she has been a consultant for various firms. Ms. Jennings is also a
columnist for The Arizona Republic.
Robert G. Matlock, 63, has been a director since April 1993. He has, since 1984,
been an independent management consultant to various governmental agencies
involved in developing nuclear energy resources and to utilities operating
nuclear facilities.
John R. Norton III, 67, is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
J.R. Norton Company (agricultural production), Phoenix, Arizona, and was first
elected as a director of the Company in January 1984. Mr. Norton resigned as a
director in May 1985 to accept appointment as U.S. Deputy Secretary of
Agriculture, a position he held until February 1986. In February 1986 he was
reelected as a director of the Company. Mr. Norton is also a director of
Pinnacle West, Aztar Corporation (casino hotels), and Terra Industries Inc.
(agricultural chemicals).
William J. Post, 46, has been a director since September 1994. Mr. Post has been
the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer since February 1997. He had
been the Company's Chief Operating Officer since September 1994, as well as a
Senior Vice President since June 1993. Prior to that time, he had served as a
Vice President and officer of the Company since 1982. In February 1997 he also
assumed the position of President of Pinnacle West after having served as its
Executive Vice President since June 1995. Mr. Post is also a director of
Pinnacle West.
2
Donald M. Riley, 53, has been a director since June 1987. He is President and
General Manager of Gilpin's Construction Company, Inc. (general contractor),
Yuma, Arizona.
George A. Schreiber, Jr., 48, was appointed as a director effective February
1997. Mr. Schreiber was elected to the positions of Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of both the Company and Pinnacle West as of February
1997. From February 1990 to January 1997 he was Managing Director at
PaineWebber, Inc. He is also a director of Pinnacle West.
Richard Snell, 66, has been a director since July 1975. He was elected Chairman
of the Board of the Company concurrent with his selection as Chairman of the
Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Pinnacle West in February 1990.
Mr. Snell resigned from the position of President of Pinnacle West in February
1997; he remains Chairman and CEO. He is also a director of Aztar Corporation,
Banc One Arizona Corporation and Central Newspapers, Inc.
Dianne C. Walker, 40, has been a director since June 1994. She is an independent
consultant on electric utility mergers and acquisitions and asset purchase
transactions. Ms. Walker served as an electric energy consultant for Bear
Stearns from January 1990 to December 1994. Ms. Walker is also a director of
Satellite Technology Management, Comdial Corporation, and Microtest, Inc.
Ben F. Williams, Jr., 67, has been a director since December 1970. He practices
law as a sole practitioner in Tucson, Arizona. Mr. Williams was a partner in the
law firm of Lesher and Williams, Tucson, Arizona, from January 1992 to June
1994. Prior to 1992, Mr. Williams practiced law as a sole practitioner in
Douglas, Arizona.
VOTING SECURITIES
Each of the 75,260,320 shares of the Company's capital stock (71,264,947
shares of common and 3,995,373 shares of preferred) outstanding at the close of
business on March 12, 1997 entitles the holder to notice of, and to vote at, the
meeting or any adjournment thereof, but shares can be voted at the meeting only
if the holder is present or represented by proxy.
3
PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF VOTING SECURITIES
No director or director-nominee is the beneficial owner of any of the
outstanding capital stock of the Company except for Mr. Thomas G. Woods, Jr.,
who beneficially owns, in trust with his wife, 700 shares of the Company's
$2.625 Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series C, which is less than 1% of the class.
The following table shows each person who at the close of business on
December 31, 1996 was known by the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of
any class of the capital stock of the Company:
Percent
Title of Name and Address of Amount and Nature of of
Class Beneficial Owner Beneficial Ownership Class
----- ---------------- -------------------- -----
Common Pinnacle West Capital Corporation 71,264,947 100.00%
400 East Van Buren, Suite 700 (Direct)
Phoenix, AZ 85004
4
OWNERSHIP OF PINNACLE WEST SECURITIES
BY MANAGEMENT
At March 12, 1997, shares of Pinnacle West common stock beneficially owned
by the indicated persons or groups were as follows:
Shares
Beneficially Percent
Owned (1) of Class
--------- --------
Non-Employee Directors and Nominees
- -----------------------------------
Martha O. Hesse 16,700
Marianne M. Jennings (2) 110
Robert G. Matlock (2) 1,000
John R. Norton III (2) 33,500
Donald M. Riley 420
Wilma W. Schwada (2)(3) 1,320
Dianne C. Walker 100
Ben F. Williams, Jr. (2) 2,147
Thomas G. Woods, Jr. (2)(3) 3,400
Employee Directors and Officers
- -------------------------------
O. Mark DeMichele (2) 77,631
Jaron B. Norberg (2)(3) 49,541
William J. Post 73,643
George A. Schreiber, Jr. 11,200
Richard Snell 447,023
Other Officers Named on Page 10
- -------------------------------
Jack E. Davis (2) 24,579
William L. Stewart (2) 49,211
All directors, nominees and executive
officers as a group (26 persons) (2) 1,021,047 1.17%
------------------------------------
- ----------
(1) Includes shares which may be acquired by the exercise of stock options
within 60 days as follows: 14,000 for Ms. Hesse; 17,500 for Mr. Norton;
46,179 for Mr. Post; 390,833 for Mr. Snell; 9,156 for Mr. Davis; 11,833 for
Mr. Stewart and 616,339 for all directors and officers as a group. In the
case of officers, also includes shares of restricted stock and vested
shares, as of December 31, 1996, in the Company's savings plan.
(2) Includes in the cases of: Mr. Norton, 500 shares held by his wife and 2,000
shares held in a trust for Mr. Norton's late mother for which he serves as
trustee; Ms. Schwada, 1,320 shares held in a family trust; Mr. Williams, 47
shares held by his wife and 500 shares held in joint tenancy with his wife;
Mr. Woods, 3,400 shares held in a trust in which investment
5
and voting power is shared; Mr. DeMichele, 59,677 shares held in a trust in
which investment and voting power is shared; and shares as to which
investment or voting power is shared with spouses, as follows: Ms.
Jennings, 110; Mr. Matlock, 1,000; Mr. Norberg, 44,188; Mr. Davis, 6,625;
and Mr. Stewart, 10,878. Also includes for the group, 141,146 shares in
which voting or investment power is shared with others.
(3) Ms. Schwada and Mr. Woods, at mandatory retirement age, are not standing
for re-election as directors. Mr. Norberg, electing to retire early, will
also not stand for re-election.
THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES
The full Board of Directors met twelve times in 1996. No director attended
fewer than 75% of the meetings of the full Board and of the committees on which
he or she served.
The Company's Audit Review Committee reviews the performance and
independence of the Company's independent accounting firm, makes an annual
recommendation to the full Board with respect to the appointment of the firm,
approves the general nature of the services to be performed by the firm, and
solicits and reviews the firm's recommendations. The Committee also consults
with the Company's internal audit group and periodically reviews the
relationships among that group, management of the Company, and its independent
accountants. The Committee met four times in 1996 and consisted of Ms. Hesse as
chairman, Ms. Schwada and Messrs. Norton, Williams and Woods.
The Human Resources Committee makes recommendations to the full Board with
respect to executive salaries, bonuses and benefits and regularly reviews the
Company's policies in all of the foregoing areas. Its report on executive
compensation policy follows, and its members are identified at the end of that
report. In addition, the Committee also recommends prospective new Board members
to the full Board. The Committee may consider shareholder suggestions with
respect to new nominees for the Board if the suggestion is sent to the Secretary
of the Company at the address on the cover page of this Proxy Statement. The
Committee met four times in 1996.
In 1996, non-employee directors received an annual retainer of $18,000.
With certain exceptions, non-employee directors also received $900 for each
board meeting attended and $700 for each committee meeting attended.
The Company has a directors' retirement plan which, with certain
exceptions, provides to non-employee directors over the age of 65 an annual
payment of $12,000 upon their retirement from the Board. This payment is limited
to the number of credited years that the director served on the Board or until
the director dies, whichever occurs first. With limited exceptions, directors
will be credited only for years of service on the Board prior to age 65.
The Company has a consulting agreement with Robert G. Matlock & Associates,
Inc., of which Mr. Robert G. Matlock is President and Chief Executive Officer,
under which they are paid $150 per hour (maximum of $40,000 per year), plus
expenses, for consulting services relating to the Company's nuclear operations.
In 1996, $8,367, was paid under this agreement.
6
REPORT OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
The Company's Human Resources Committee (the "Committee") is composed of
six directors, none of whom currently is, or has ever been, an officer or
employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The responsibilities of the
Committee include reviewing annually, and recommending to the full Board of
Directors, the cash compensation paid to the Company's officers, establishing
annual goals for such officers, and approving the payment of variable pay
incentives when such goals are met. Pursuant to these duties, the Committee
obtains information regarding stock incentive plans authorized by Pinnacle West
shareholders, under which stock options and other long-term incentives may be
awarded to the Company's officers and key employees by the human resources
committee of the board of Pinnacle West. Information regarding the compensation
objectives and philosophy of the Pinnacle West human resources committee was
taken from that committee's report contained in the proxy statement relating to
Pinnacle West's 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The executive compensation policy, as developed and adopted by the
Committee, is incentive-based and provides for short- and long-term incentives
in the form of bonuses and equity. The policy is designed to reward individual
performance in critical areas of the Company's operations, including cost
management, earnings performance, customer service, safety, and environmental
concerns. Incentive goals are developed annually to focus on the Company's
profitability and its operational results in the short and long term. The
Committee recommends Board approval of the compensation of Company officers in
accordance with the achievement of incentive goals and comparable median
industry levels.
The Committee's overall compensation philosophy is to (I) attract and
retain qualified individuals critical to the Company's success, (ii) reinforce
strategic objectives through the use of incentive compensation programs and
(iii) promote long-term stock ownership by executives. The Committee applies its
own compensation philosophy (and specifically its bias toward rewarding
performance) to comparative information provided by independent consultants. In
1996, information was provided by the consultants for a number of other
organizations engaged primarily in the electric utility business and having
characteristics similar to the Company. In addition, information was provided
for a general industry group consisting of companies of similar size.
Base Salaries. The Committee reviews each executive officer's base salary
annually. To determine an appropriate salary level, consideration is given to
individual performance, level of responsibility, prior experience and expertise,
and base pay of officers performing similar functions at comparable utility
companies. Base salaries for Company officers, as a group, were below the median
salaries of the utility group. Some officers received above-average increases in
order to either bring them closer to the median or in recognition of their
expertise and importance to the organization.
Bonuses. The Company has established a policy of having a significant
portion of compensation achieved through incentives, such as bonuses, tied to
Company performance and the attainment of goals established by the Committee.
Under the Company's variable pay plan for officers, the total compensation
of the executive officers is significantly impacted by the degree of
accomplishment in lowering the cost of producing electricity (defined as the
unit cost ratio, or UCR). The amount of incentive compensation paid, if any,
depends upon the degree of success in meeting that goal. However,
7
the plan does not allow any cash incentives to be paid unless the Company
achieves a certain level of UCR reduction as established by the Committee at the
beginning of the year. In 1996, Company performance exceeded all of the overall
corporate goals and a majority of the department key result area targets.
Under the plan, targeted incentive payments for officers ranged from 13% to
20% of salary, and could reach from 37% to 60% of salary, depending on their
position and performance. One hundred percent of Mr. DeMichele's cash incentive
payment, and 40% of the other officers' cash incentive payments, are based on
overall corporate performance (i.e., UCR achievement). The remaining 60% of the
cash incentive payments for the officers (other than Mr. DeMichele) is based on
business unit results, as determined by Mr. DeMichele.
Long-Term Incentives. The human resources committee of the board of
Pinnacle West makes the decisions on long-term incentive grants and believes
that the ultimate measure of management's performance is its ability to deliver
rewards to shareholders in the form of share price appreciation and rising
dividends over time. To those ends, the Pinnacle West committee makes systematic
grants of restricted stock and stock options to officers and key management
employees of Pinnacle West and its subsidiaries, including the Company, in order
that they may participate in those rewards through stock ownership.
The Pinnacle West committee also believes that senior management personnel,
including those of its subsidiaries, should have a significant, ongoing personal
investment in Pinnacle West. To that end, restricted stock grants, besides being
compensatory in nature, are utilized to encourage the attainment and retention
of targeted levels of individual stock ownership by conditioning their vesting
upon the ownership of certain numbers of shares for predetermined periods of
time.
The size of awards made by the human resources committee of the board of
Pinnacle West to the Company's participants in the program is determined by
making assumptions as to how, generally, Pinnacle West stock should perform if
Pinnacle West achieves its longer-term goals, and individual grants were then
determined by bringing the recipient's total compensation to a target level
relative to comparator groups, provided that the stock performs as assumed.
This Committee concurs with the position taken by the board of Pinnacle
West and its program regarding grants of restricted stock and stock options to
officers and key employees of the Company.
CEO Compensation. Upon reviewing the data received from its consultants,
and taking into account Mr. DeMichele's impending retirement, which occurred in
February 1997, the Committee did not increase Mr. DeMichele's base salary from
its 1995 level. Mr. DeMichele's targeted bonus payment for 1996 was 20% of
year-end base salary, but could reach up to 60% of salary, depending upon the
level of attainment of unit cost ratio, the sole determinant of his bonus
payment. His actual bonus received reflected the maximum targeted attainment of
UCR. Mr. DeMichele was not granted options in November 1996, due to his
scheduled retirement. He was given a restricted stock award, however, in
recognition of the reduction of his personal earnings capacity as a result of
his early retirement.
Tax Consideration. Publicly traded corporations generally are not permitted
to deduct, for federal income tax purposes, annual compensation in excess of $1
million paid to any of certain top executives, except to the extent the
compensation qualifies as "performance-based." While
8
the Committee prefers to reward performance through the bonus and equity
participation programs, certain features of these programs do not fit the law's
stringent definition of "performance-based," and limited amounts of compensation
may therefore not be deductible.
The foregoing report of the Human Resources Committee is provided by its
members: Mr. Riley (Chairman), Mmes. Hesse, Jennings and Schwada and Messrs.
Matlock and Williams.
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The annual changes for the five-year period shown in the following graph
are based on the assumption that $100 was invested on the last trading day in
1991 in Pinnacle West stock and in the market represented by each of two indices
(the Dow Jones Equity Market Index and the Edison Electric Institute Index of
100 Investor-Owned Electrics), and that any dividends were reinvested. The
common stock of Pinnacle West is used to measure the performance of the Company
because the Company is the largest subsidiary of Pinnacle West and its
operations account for substantially all of Pinnacle West's operating revenues.
Date DJ Equity EEI 100 PNW
12/31/91 100.00 100.00 100.00
12/31/92 108.61 107.59 117.27
12/31/93 119.41 119.58 129.93
12/31/94 120.33 105.74 119.16
12/31/95 166.50 138.55 181.15
12/31/96 205.57 140.22 206.94
9
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following tables on compensation and stock options relate to the five
most highly compensated executive officers of the Company. Information given
with respect to stock options and restricted stock relate to shares of the
common stock of Pinnacle West.
Summary Compensation Table
Long-Term Compensation
----------------------
Annual Compensation Awards
- ------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- ------------------
Name and Restricted
Principal Stock All Other
Position Year Salary Bonus Awards (1) Options Compensation (2)
- -------- ---- ------ ------ ---------- ------- ----------------
Jack E. Davis 1996 $193,669 $127,142 $69,168 11,000 $10,016
Exec. VP, Commercial 1995 174,763 66,057 32,928 6,000 8,020
Operations 1994 161,660 57,803 26,600 7,000 3,119
O. Mark DeMichele (3) 1996 $409,904 $245,942 $603,648 0 $25,436
President & CEO 1995 409,904 245,942 526,848 21,000 24,037
1994 402,008 242,690 380,000 25,000 12,873
Jaron B. Norberg (4) 1996 $265,994 $122,670 $0 0 $455,037
Exec. VP & CFO 1995 259,344 126,819 76,832 14,000 15,230
1994 254,400 129,717 60,800 16,000 9,339
William J. Post (4) 1996 $325,000 $165,100 $106,896 17,000 $11,015
Sr. VP & COO 1995 287,500 175,500 93,296 17,000 12,229
1994 195,522 145,672 64,600 17,000 5,265
William L. Stewart 1996 $349,693 $232,374 $285,776 17,000 $ 10,057
Exec. VP, Generation 1995 306,595 186,214 90,552 16,500 10,175
1994 307,869 152,400 237,200 69,000 818
(1) The value of the restricted stock is based on the closing market price of
Pinnacle West common stock on the date the restricted shares were granted.
The restrictions lapse on most restricted stock awards made in 1996 upon
(I) the passage of three years from date of grant or upon retirement after
the age of 60, and (ii) the holding of certain numbers of unrestricted
shares for certain periods of time, as determined by the Pinnacle West
Human Resources Committee at the time of grant. Dividends that are payable
in cash or stock will be withheld until the restrictions lapse. 6,000 of
the 9,400 shares granted to Mr. Stewart in 1996 did not have an
unrestricted stock matching requirement.
The aggregate number of restricted shares held and their value (in
brackets) as of December 31, 1996 are as follows: Mr. Davis -- 5,100
[$161,925]; Mr. DeMichele -- 58,400 [$1,854,200]; Mr. Norberg -- 0 [$0];
Mr. Post -- 10,200 [$323,850]; and Mr. Stewart -- 26,500 [$841,375].
(2) This column includes (I) the above market portion of interest accrued in
1996 on funds deferred under a deferred compensation plan in the following
amounts: Mr. Davis -- $3,951; Mr. DeMichele -- $6,893; Mr. Norberg --
$4,134; Mr. Post -- $5,261; and Mr. Stewart -- $1,851; (ii) Company
contributions made during 1996 under the Company's Employee Savings Plan in
the following amounts: Mr. Davis -- $4,220; Mr. DeMichele -- $4,500; Mr.
Norberg -- $4,500; Mr. Post -- $4,500; and Mr. Stewart -- $-0-; and (iii)
premiums paid by the Company for life insurance in the following amounts:
Mr. Davis --$1,854; Mr. DeMichele -- $14,043; Mr. Norberg -- $5,011; Mr.
Post -- $1,254; and Mr. Stewart -- $8,206.[Reg. S-K Item 402(b)(2)(v)] Mr.
Norberg received $441,392 in additional severance benefits to compensate
him for benefits he was losing by retiring early.
(3) Mr. DeMichele retired on February 20, 1997, at which point the time
restrictions on his restricted stock lapsed. Additionally, his 1995 and
1996 grants did not contain unrestricted stock matching requirements.
(4) Mr. Norberg retired from the Company on December 31, 1996. Mr. Post became
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company on February 20, 1997.
10
Pinnacle West Stock Option Grants in 1996
Percentage of
Options Total Options
Granted Granted to All Exercise Grant Date
in 1996 Employees in Price Expiration Present
Name (Shares)(1) 1996 (per share) Date Value(2)
- ---- ----------- ------ ----------- ---- --------
Jack E. Davis 11,000 4.22% $31.44 11/20/06 $47,850
O. Mark DeMichele -0- -0- N/A N/A $0
Jaron B. Norberg -0- -0- N/A N/A $0
William J. Post 17,000 6.52% $31.44 11/20/06 $73,950
William L. Stewart 17,000 6.52% $31.44 11/20/06 $73,950
(1) Options vest annually in installments of 33% per year beginning on the
first anniversary of the date of grant. All options not already exercisable
will become exercisable if an individual retires on or after the age of 60
as was the case upon Mr. DeMichele's retirement. No SARs have been granted.
(2) The Black-Scholes option pricing model was used in determining the present
value of the options granted. The assumptions utilized in the model are as
follows: 17.1% for expected volatility; 5.8 % for risk-free rate of return;
4.5% for dividend yield and 5 years for the time of exercise.
Stock Option Exercises in 1996
and Year-End Option Values
Number of Securities Value of Unexercised
Underlying Unexercised Options In-The-Money Options
at Fiscal Year-End at Fiscal Year-End (2)
------------------ ----------------------
Shares
Acquired on Value
Name Exercise Realized(1) Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
---- -------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
Jack E. Davis 6,666 $76,720 8,594 17,834 $62,826 $52,206
O. Mark DeMichele 7,156 $48,875 105,433 22,334 $1,042,619 $159,619
Jaron B. Norberg 53,357 $479,658 0 0 $0 $0
William J. Post 0 $0 44,436 34,001 $465,777 $115,790
William L. Stewart 39,666 $489,909 11,833 51,001 $100,752 $371,714
(1) Value of options exercised is the market value of the shares on the
exercise date minus the exercise price.
(2) The value of options equals the market value of Pinnacle West common stock
on December 31, 1996 ($31.75 per share) minus the exercise price of
options.
11
EXECUTIVE BENEFIT PLANS
Employees' Retirement Plan and Supplemental Excess Benefit Retirement Plan.
The following table illustrates the annual benefits, calculated on a
straight-life annuity basis, that would be provided under the Company Employees'
Retirement Plan and the Supplemental Excess Benefit Retirement Plan to the
Company's officers who retire at the indicated compensation and longevity
levels.
Years of Service
Average Annual ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Compensation (a) 5(b) 10 20 25(C)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 100,000 $ 15,000 $ 30,000 $ 50,000 $ 60,000
200,000 30,000 60,000 100,000 120,000
250,000 37,500 75,000 125,000 150,000
300,000 45,000 90,000 150,000 180,000
400,000 60,000 120,000 200,000 240,000
500,000 75,000 150,000 250,000 300,000
600,000 90,000 180,000 300,000 360,000
700,000 105,000 210,000 350,000 420,000
800,000 120,000 240,000 400,000 480,000
- ------------
(a) Compensation under the retirement plan consists solely of base salary up to
$150,000 (as adjusted for cost-of-living), including any amounts
voluntarily deferred under the Company's 401(k) plan. While the retirement
plan does not include amounts voluntarily deferred under other deferred
compensation plans, bonuses or incentive pay, the Supplemental Excess
Benefit Retirement Plan does include, subject to certain exceptions, these
additional components of compensation plus base salary beyond the $150,000
limit.
(b) Although years of service begin accumulating on the date of employment,
benefits do not vest until the completion of five years of service.
(c) Although the maximum number of years used in calculating benefits under the
Employee's Retirement Plan is generally 33-1/3, a greater maximum benefit
is achieved under the Supplemental Excess Benefit Retirement Plan after 25
years of service.
For officers, the Company's Supplemental Excess Benefit Retirement Plan
provides enhanced benefits. Benefits payable under this plan that are in excess
of the benefits payable under the Company's retirement plan (which, as a
qualified defined benefit pension plan, is limited pursuant to the Internal
Revenue Code), are payable from the general assets of the Company. The number of
credited years of service for each of the individuals named on page
12
10 and their 1996 remuneration covered by the Company's plans are as follows:
Mr. Davis -- 24 years, $259,726; Mr. DeMichele -- 36 years (see description of
Mr. DeMichele's employment agreement below), $655,846; Mr. Norberg -- 25 years
(see description of Mr. Norberg's employment and severance agreements below),
$392,813; Mr. Post -- 24 years, $500,500 and Mr. Stewart -- 3 years (see
description of Mr. Stewart's employment agreement below), $535,907. The amounts
shown in the table are not expected to be subject to any reduction or offset for
social security benefits or other significant amounts.
Employment and Severance Arrangements. In April 1978 Mr. DeMichele and the
Company entered into an agreement under which the Company, in calculating Mr.
DeMichele's pension benefits, granted Mr. DeMichele credit for 17 years of prior
employment with another company. Mr. DeMichele's credited years of service
disclosed above (36) include the credit for his prior employment. The Company
will also compensate Mr. DeMichele for increased retiree medical premiums
resulting from a change in the premium structure that became effective January
1, 1997.
In August 1996 the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Stewart which
provides a retirement benefit calculated by adding a base amount of 20% of his
average monthly wage and 10% of his average monthly wage for each year of
service up to a maximum of 100% of his average monthly salary. He becomes vested
in this benefit upon completion of four years employment. In addition, Mr.
Stewart is to receive 2,000 shares of restricted Pinnacle West stock annually.
The Company also agreed to purchase Mr. Stewart's home for $1.1 million, the
appraised value and the amount for which the Company believes it could be sold,
and to allow him to live there as long as he remains an employee of the Company.
Mr. Stewart recognized $100,000 in appreciation on the sale of his home to the
Company.
In July 1995 Mr. Norberg and the Company entered into an agreement under
which the Company, in calculating Mr. Norberg's pension benefits, granted Mr.
Norberg credit for four additional years of employment. In December 1996 Mr.
Norberg and the Company entered into an agreement whereby Mr. Norberg, in
recognition of his retiring early, received a severance payment equal to one
year of his base salary plus additional monies to compensate him for equity
awards that would have vested within the next year. Mr. Norberg was also
credited with five additional years of service and one year of age for purposes
of calculating his pension benefits. Mr. Norberg's credited years of service
disclosed above (25) include the additional years credited to him under his
agreements with the Company. Additionally, at the discretion of the Chief
Executive Officer, Mr. Norberg may provide up to six hundred hours of consulting
services to the Company in each of the two years following his retirement at a
rate of two hundred dollars per hour.
Effective January 1, 1992, the Company established a deferred compensation
plan for directors and officers of the Company. Effective January 1, 1996, the
Company established a revocable trust for the purpose of funding the benefits
under the deferred compensation plan. Upon the occurrence of certain events,
which generally include the sale of substantially all the Company's assets, a
merger or consolidation in which the Company is not the surviving entity,
certain changes in the composition of the Board of Directors or someone
acquiring 20 percent or more of the Company's voting stock, the trust will
become irrevocable and the Company will be required to fully fund the benefits
earned under the deferred compensation plan within 60 days after the occurrence
of that event.
13
The Company has entered into severance agreements, which are identical in
content, with each of its executive officers. The agreements are intended to
provide stability of key management for the Company. Under the agreements, each
officer will receive a payment and other severance benefits having an aggregate
value of not more than 2.99 times the officer's "base income" (the average of
the officer's annual compensation over the five years preceding the year of the
"change in control") if, during the two-year period following a "change in
control" of the Company, the officer's employment is terminated or the terms and
conditions of his or her employment are significantly and detrimentally altered.
"Change in control" includes any change in control event required to be reported
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, an unrelated third party's
acquisition of 20% or more of the Company's voting stock or substantially all of
the assets of the Company, a merger or acquisition of the Company in which the
Company is not the surviving corporation unless the Company's shareholders have
the same proportionate interest in the surviving corporation, or a change in the
majority of the members of the Company's Board of Directors over a two-year
period, which change is not approved by two-thirds of the members of the Board
then serving who were members immediately prior to the change. No severance
benefits will be payable to an officer who has attained age 65 or whose
termination is on account of retirement, voluntary termination, disability or
death, or "for cause," as defined in the agreements. An officer will not be
deemed to have voluntarily terminated his or her employment if the officer's
termination is due to a material adverse change in his or her duties, status, or
perquisites, failure to re-elect or redesignate the officer to a position held
prior to the "change in control," a significant relocation of the officer's job
without his or her consent, or a material breach by the Company of the officer's
severance agreement. Each of the executive severance agreements terminates on
December 31 of each year, upon six months' advance notice by the Company to the
officer; if such notice is not given, the agreement will continue for successive
one-year periods until the notice is given.
GENERAL
Cost of Solicitation. The cost of the solicitation of proxies, which will
be by mail, will be borne by the Company. Brokerage houses and others will be
reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses in forwarding documents to
beneficial owners of stock.
Independent Public Accountants. It is anticipated that the Company's
financial statements as of December 31, 1997 and for the year then ended will be
examined by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent certified public accountants.
Representatives of that firm are expected to be present at the annual meeting
with the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and to be available
to respond to appropriate questions.
Voting Procedures. A majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote in
person or by proxy at the meeting will constitute a quorum for the conduct of
business.
For the election of directors, the individuals receiving the highest number
of votes will be elected. The number of votes to which each shareholder will be
entitled is to be determined by multiplying the number of shares of common stock
owned as of the March 12, 1997 record date by the number of directors to be
elected, and any shareholder may cumulate his or her votes by casting them all
in person or by proxy for any one nominee, or by distributing them among
14
two or more nominees. Broker "non-votes" with respect to any matter are not
considered shares present and will not affect the outcome of the vote on such
matter.
Shareholder Proposals for Next Annual Meeting. In order to be considered
for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the 1998
annual meeting of the Company's shareholders, a proposal intended by a
shareholder for presentation at that meeting must be submitted in accordance
with the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and received
by the Company at its principal executive offices on or before December 2, 1997.
Proposals to be presented at the annual meeting which are not intended for
inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy must be submitted in
accordance with the applicable provisions of the Company's Bylaws, a copy of
which is available upon written request delivered to the Office of the
Secretary. The Company suggests that proponents submit their proposals to the
Office of the Secretary by Certified Mail -- Return Receipt Requested.
15
Arizona Public Service Company
P.O. Box 53999
Phoenix, Arizona 85072-3999
April 1, 1997
Dear Shareholders:
The 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Arizona Public Service Company will
be held in the offices of the Company at 400 North Fifth Street, Phoenix,
Arizona on May 20, 1997 at 10 a.m. Phoenix time.
Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please
review the enclosed proxy statement, complete the proxy form below and return it
promptly in the envelope provided.
Sincerely,
Nancy C. Loftin
Vice President, Chief Legal
Counsel & Secretary
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROXY FORM Arizona Public Service Company PROXY FORM
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors for the Annual
Meeting on May 20, 1997.
The undersigned hereby appoints William J. Post and Nancy C. Loftin, and each of
them, proxies for the undersigned, each with full power of substitution, to
attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Arizona Public Service Company to
be held May 20, 1997 at ten a.m., Phoenix time, and at any adjournment thereof,
and to vote as specified in this Proxy all the shares of stock of the Company
which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present. The
proxies of the undersigned may vote according to their discretion on any other
matter that may properly come before the meeting.
Voting with respect to the election of Directors may be indicated on the reverse
of this card. Nominees for Director are: O. Mark DeMichele, Martha O. Hesse,
Marianne Moody Jennings, Robert G. Matlock, John R. Norton III, William J. Post,
Donald M. Riley, George A. Schreiber, Jr., Richard Snell, Dianne C. Walker and
Ben F. Williams, Jr.
This proxy will be voted as specified on the reverse. If no specification
is made, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of Directors.
Election of Directors
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of Directors.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR* WITHHOLD
1. Election of Directors (see other side) [ ] [ ]
*For all nominees, except vote withheld from the following:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
Signature Date
----------------------------------------
Signature Date
Please sign as your name(s) appears
to the left. Joint owners should both
sign. Fiduciaries, attorneys,
corporate officers, etc. should state
their capacities.
Any proxy given previously if hereby revoked.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fold and detach Fold and detach