SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): January 11, 1999
----------------
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Arizona 1-4473 86-0011170
- ---------------------------- ----------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction (Commission (IRS Employer
of incorporation) File Number) Identification Number)
400 North Fifth Street, P.O. Box 53999, Phoenix, Arizona 85004
- -------------------------------------------------------- ----------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(602) 250-1000
--------------------------------------------------
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
NONE
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS
ACC RULES
As previously reported, in December 1998, the Arizona Corporation
Commission ("ACC") adopted amended rules regarding the introduction of retail
electric competition in Arizona. See Item 5 of the Arizona Public Service
Company (the "Company") Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 9, 1998. On
January 11, 1999, the ACC issued an order which stayed the amended rules,
granted reconsideration of the decision to make the rules permanent and directed
the hearing division of the ACC to establish a procedural order for further
action on the amended rules. The order also granted waivers from compliance with
the rules to affected utilities, including the Company.
On February 5, 1999 the ACC hearing officers issued recommendations for
changes to the amended rules. The major provisions of the proposed changes
differ from the amended rules as follows:
+ The recommended rules require each affected utility, including the
Company, to make available at least 20% of its 1995 system retail peak demand
for competitive generation supply to all customer classes beginning on a date to
be established by the ACC in its final decision on each affected utility's
stranded costs and unbundled rates ("Final Decision Date"), assuming the Final
Decision Date is before January 1, 2001. If the Final Decision Date is after
January 1, 2001, all customers would have competitive access and the phase-in
described in the next two paragraphs would no longer be operative.
+ All affected utility customers with single premise loads of one
megawatt or greater will be eligible for competitive electric services beginning
on the Final Decision Date, subject to the 20% level described in the previous
paragraph. Subject to this 20% provision, affected utility customers with single
premise loads of forty kilowatts or greater would be able to aggregate into a
combined load of one megawatt or greater to be eligible for competitive electric
services on the Final Decision Date.
+ Beginning on the Final Decision Date, residential customers will have
access to competitive services through a quarterly phase-in of one and
one-quarter percent of residential customers per quarter calculated beginning on
January 1, 1999, subject to the overall 20% level described in the preceding two
paragraphs.
+ Affected utilities must file with the ACC proposed tariffs for
unbundled noncompetitive service (electric service elements provided and priced
separately) by March 19, 1999.
+ Beginning on January 1, 2001, each affected utility will be prohibited
from providing all competitive electric services, except through a separate
affiliate.
+ The recommended rules contain affiliate transaction provisions
generally prohibiting an affected utility or an electric service provider that
has an affiliate that would have been a utility distribution company ("UDC") if
operated in Arizona, and its competitive electric affiliates from sharing
personnel, office space, equipment, services, and systems, except to the extent
appropriate to perform certain permissible shared corporate functions. No later
than September 30, 1999, each affected utility and UDC must file a compliance
plan with the ACC demonstrating its compliance with the affiliate transaction
rules.
+ By September 15, 1999, each affected utility must file a proposed plan
for residential phase-in implementation, and by November 1, 1999, each affected
utility must file a report detailing possible mechanisms to provide benefits,
such as rate reductions of 3% to 5%, to all standard offer customers.
If approved by the ACC, the rules would be subject to the formal
rulemaking process under Arizona statute. In compliance with statutory
procedural requirements, ACC oral proceedings on the matter would be scheduled
no sooner than 30 days after the proposed rules are published by the Secretary
of State.
STRANDED COSTS
On February 5, 1999, the ACC hearing officer issued recommended changes to
the June 1998 stranded cost order. See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Financial
Statements in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Fiscal Quarter
ended September 30, 1998 (the "September 10-Q Report"). The recommended order
allows each affected utility to choose between four options for the recovery of
stranded costs, as follows:
+ Net Revenues Lost Methodology is the difference between revenues under
regulation and revenues under competition. This includes declining recovery
percentages for stranded costs over a five year transition period, with built in
incentive mechanisms. Under this methodology, the recommended rules would reduce
the return on unamortized regulatory assets over the five years following the
initial five-year transition period. In accordance with a 1996 regulatory
agreement, the ACC accelerated the amortization of substantially all of the
Company's regulatory assets to an eight-year period that ends June 30, 2004.
+ Divestiture/Auction Methodology allows an affected utility to divest
its generating assets, after which the affected utility would be permitted to
collect 100 percent of its stranded costs over a ten-year period, with no return
on the unamortized balance.
+ Financial Integrity Methodology (similar to the previous Transition
Revenues Methodology) allows an affected utility "sufficient revenues to meet
minimum financial ratios" for a period of ten years.
+ Settlement Methodology allows a settlement to be agreed upon by the ACC
and an affected utility.
Each affected utility must file a plan of its choice of options for
stranded cost recovery no later than March 19, 1999. The recommended changes to
the stranded cost order would be effective upon approval of the ACC.
The Company cannot currently predict when or if the amended rules will be
further modified, when the stay of the amended rules will be lifted or when
retail electric competition will be introduced in Arizona with respect to
affected utilities.
AGREEMENT WITH SALT RIVER AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT
On February 2, 1999, the ACC hearing officer recommended ACC approval of
the Company's Memorandum of Agreement, as amended, with Salt River. See Note 7
of Notes to Condensed Financial Statements in the September 10-Q Report.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
In light of the withdrawal of the settlement agreement between the Company
and the ACC Staff, on December 22, 1998, the Arizona Supreme Court vacated its
order staying ACC hearings regarding the proposed settlement agreement and
dismissed the Attorney General's action. See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed
Financial Statements in the September 10-Q Report.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
(Registrant)
Dated: February 8, 1999 By: Michael V. Palmeri
---------------------------
Michael V. Palmeri
Treasurer