1
EXHIBIT 99
SAFE HARBOR UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act")
provides a "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements to encourage companies
to provide prospective information about their companies, so long as those
statements are identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful
cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those discussed in the statement. The Bank of
Kentucky Financial Corporation ("BKFC") desires to take advantage of the "safe
harbor" provisions of the Act. Certain information, particularly information
regarding future economic performance and finances and plans and objectives of
management, contained or incorporated by reference in BKFC's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for fiscal year 2000 is forward-looking. In some cases, information
regarding certain important factors that could cause actual results of
operations or outcomes of other events to differ materially from any such
forward-looking statement appears together with such statement. In addition,
forward-looking statements are subject to other risks and uncertainties
affecting the financial institutions industry, including, but not limited to,
the following:
Interest Rate Risk
BKFC's operating results are dependent to a significant degree on its
net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from loans,
investments and other interest-earning assets and interest expense on deposits,
borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. The interest income and
interest expense of BKFC change as the interest rates on interest-earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities change. Interest rates may change because of
general economic conditions, the policies of various regulatory authorities and
other factors beyond BKFC's control. In a rising interest rate environment,
loans tend to prepay slowly and new loans at higher rates increase slowly, while
interest paid on deposits increases rapidly because the terms to maturity of
deposits tend to be shorter than the terms to maturity or prepayment of loans.
Such differences in the adjustment of interest rates on assets and liabilities
may negatively affect BKFC's income.
Possible Inadequacy of the Allowance for Loan Losses
BKFC maintains an allowance for loan losses based upon a number of
relevant factors, including, but not limited to, trends in the level of
nonperforming assets and classified loans, current and anticipated economic
conditions in the primary lending area, past loss experience, possible losses
arising from specific problem loans and changes in the composition of the loan
portfolio. While the Board of Directors of BKFC believes that it uses the best
information available to determine the allowance for loan losses, unforeseen
market conditions could result in material adjustments, and net earnings could
be significantly adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from
the assumptions used in making the final determination.
Loans not secured by one- to four-family residential real estate are
generally considered to involve greater risk of loss than loans secured by one-
to four-family residential real estate due, in part, to the effects of general
economic conditions. The repayment of commercial loans and multifamily
residential and nonresidential real estate loans generally depends upon the cash
flow from the operation of the business or property, which may be negatively
affected by national and local economic conditions. Construction loans may also
be negatively affected by such economic conditions, particularly loans made to
developers who do not have a buyer for a property before the loan is made. The
risk of default on consumer loans increases during periods of recession, high
unemployment and other adverse economic conditions. When consumers have trouble
paying their bills, they are more likely to pay mortgage loans than consumer
loans. In addition, the collateral securing such loans, if any, may decrease in
value more rapidly than the outstanding balance of the loan.
Competition
The Bank of Kentucky, Inc. (the "Bank") competes for deposits with
other commercial banks, savings associations and credit unions and issuers of
commercial paper and other securities, such as shares in money market mutual
funds. The primary factors in competing for deposits are interest rates and
convenience of office location. In making loans, the Bank competes with other
commercial banks, savings and loan associations, savings banks, consumer finance
companies, credit unions, leasing companies, mortgage companies and other
lenders. Competition is affected by, among other things, the general
availability of lendable funds, general and local economic conditions, current
interest rate levels and other factors that are not readily predictable. The
size of financial institutions competing with the Bank is likely to increase as
a result of changes in statutes and regulations
2
eliminating various restrictions on interstate and inter-industry branching and
acquisitions. Such increased competition may have an adverse effect upon the
Bank.
Legislation and Regulation that may Adversely Affect BKFC's Earnings
The Bank is subject to regulation by the Department of Financial
Institutions of the Commonwealth of Kentucky and the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (the "FDIC") and is periodically examined by such regulatory
agencies to test compliance with various regulatory requirements. As a savings
and loan holding company, BKFC is also subject to regulation and examination by
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Such supervision and
regulation of the Bank and BKFC are intended primarily for the protection of
depositors and not for the maximization of shareholder value and may affect the
ability of the company to engage in various business activities. The
assessments, filing fees and other costs associated with reports, examinations
and other regulatory matters are significant and may have an adverse effect on
BKFC's net earnings.
The FDIC is authorized to establish separate annual assessment rates
for deposit insurance of members of the Bank Insurance fund (the "BIF") and the
Savings Association Insurance Fund (the "SAIF"). The FDIC has established a
risk-based assessment system for both SAIF and BIF members. Under such system,
assessments may vary depending on the risk the institution poses to its deposit
insurance fund. Such risk level is determined by reference to the institution's
capital level and the FDIC's level of supervisory concern about the institution.
On November 12, 1999, President Clinton signed into law the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act
of 1999). The Financial Services Modernization Act will, effective March 11,
2000, permit bank holding companies to become financial holding companies and
thereby affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies and engage in
other activities that are financial in nature. A bank holding company may become
a financial holding company if each of its subsidiary banks is well capitalized
under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Act of 1991 prompt corrective
action provisions, is well managed, and has at least a satisfactory rating under
the Community Reinvestment Act, by filing a declaration that the bank holding
company wishes to become a financial holding company. No regulatory approval
will be required for a financial holding company to acquire a company, other
than a bank or savings association, engaged in activities that are financial in
nature or incidental to activities that are financial in nature, as determine by
the Federal Reserve Board.
The Financial Services Modernization Act defines "financial in nature"
to include:
o securities underwriting, dealing and market making;
o sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies;
o insurance underwriting and agency;
o merchant banking; and
o activities that the Federal Reserve Board has
determined to be closely related to banking.
Subsidiary banks of a financial holding company must continue to be well
capitalized and well managed in order to continue to engage in activities that
are financial in nature without regulatory actions or restrictions, which could
include divesture of a financial-in-nature subsidiary or subsidiaries of the
subsidiary banks. In addition, a financial holding company or a bank may not
acquire a company that is engaged in activities that are financial in nature
unless each of the subsidiary banks of the financial holding company or the bank
has a Community Reinvestment Act rating of satisfactory or better.
The Financial Services Modernization Act may increase competition
within the banking industry in general and for BKFC and BKI in particular as
financial institutions increase their range of financial services, which may
have an adverse effect on BKFC and BKI.