- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(X) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 0-23320

OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

<Table>

OHIO 34-1245650
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)

5096 RICHMOND ROAD, BEDFORD HEIGHTS, OHIO 44146
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
</Table>

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (216) 292-3800

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:
None

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:
Common Stock, without par value

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (X) No ( )

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. ( )

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes ( ) No (X)

As of June 30, 2002, the aggregate market value of voting stock held by
nonaffiliates of the registrant based on the closing price at which such stock
was sold on the Nasdaq National Market on such date approximated $45,448,980.
The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of June 30, 2002 was
9,638,100.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Registrant intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a
definitive Proxy Statement pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 within 120 days of the close of its fiscal year ended December 31,
2002, portions of which document shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference
in Part I and Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K from the date such
document is filed.

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

THE COMPANY

The Company is a North American steel service center with 48 years of
experience in specialized processing and distribution of large volumes of
carbon, coated carbon and stainless steel, flat-rolled sheet, and coil and plate
products from 12 facilities in eight midwestern and eastern states. The Company
also participates in two joint ventures in Michigan. Net sales for the Company
totaled $459 million in 2002. The Company operates as an intermediary between
steel producers and manufacturers that require processed steel for their
operations. The Company purchases flat-rolled steel typically from steel
producers and responds to its customers' needs by processing steel to customer
specifications and by providing critical inventory and just-in-time delivery
services. Such services reduce customers' inventory levels, as well as save
time, labor and expense for customers, thereby reducing their overall production
costs. The Company's services include both traditional service center processes
of cutting-to-length, slitting, and shearing and higher value-added processes of
blanking, tempering, plate burning, laser welding, and precision machining of
steel parts. In 2002 the Company ceased providing roll forming services.

The Company operates as a single business segment and is organized into
three regional operations with domestic processing and distribution facilities
in Connecticut, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Illinois, Iowa, and
Minnesota, servicing a diverse base of customers primarily located throughout
the midwestern, eastern and southern United States. Its international sales
office is located in Florida and services customers primarily in Puerto Rico and
Mexico.

The Company is incorporated under the laws of the State of Ohio. The
Company's executive offices are located at 5096 Richmond Road, Cleveland, Ohio
44146. Its telephone number is (216) 292-3800, and its website address is
www.olysteel.com.

INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

The steel industry is comprised of three types of entities: steel
producers, intermediate steel processors and steel service centers. Steel
producers have historically emphasized the sale of steel to volume purchasers
and have generally viewed intermediate steel processors and steel service
centers as part of their customer base. However, all three entities can compete
for certain customers who purchase large quantities of steel. Intermediate steel
processors tend to serve as processors in large quantities for steel producers
and major industrial consumers of processed steel, including automobile and
appliance manufacturers.

Services provided by steel service centers can range from storage and
distribution of unprocessed metal products to complex, precision value-added
steel processing. Steel service centers respond directly to customer needs and
emphasize value-added processing of steel pursuant to specific customer demands,
such as cutting-to-length, slitting, shearing, roll forming, shape correction
and surface improvement, blanking, tempering, plate burning and stamping. These
processes produce steel to specified lengths, widths, shapes and surface
characteristics through the use of specialized equipment. Steel service centers
typically have lower cost structures and provide services and value-added
processing not otherwise available from steel producers.

End product manufacturers and other steel users have increasingly sought to
purchase steel on shorter lead times and with more frequent and reliable
deliveries than can normally be provided by steel producers. Steel service
centers generally have lower labor costs than steel producers and consequently
process steel on a more cost-effective basis. In addition, due to this lower
cost structure, steel service centers are able to handle orders in quantities
smaller than would be economical for steel producers. The benefits to customers
purchasing products from steel service centers include lower inventory levels,
lower overall cost of raw materials, more timely response and decreased
manufacturing time and operating expense. The Company believes that the
increasing prevalence of just-in-time delivery requirements has made the
value-added inventory, processing and delivery functions performed by steel
service centers increasingly important.

CORPORATE HISTORY

The Company was founded in 1954 by the Siegal family as a general steel
service center. Michael Siegal (CEO), the son of one of the founders, began his
career with the Company in the early 1970's and became CEO at the end of 1983.
David Wolfort (President and COO) joined the Company as General Manager in 1984.
In the late 1980's, the Company's business strategy changed from a focus on
warehousing and distributing steel from a single facility with no major
processing equipment to a focus on growth, geographic and customer diversity and
value-added processing. An integral part of the Company's growth has been the
acquisition and start-up of several processing and sales operations, and the
investment in processing equipment. In March 1994, the Company completed an
initial public offering, and in August 1996, completed a follow-on offering of
its Common Stock.

BUSINESS STRATEGY AND OBJECTIVES

The Company believes that the steel service center and processing industry
continues to be driven by four primary trends: increased outsourcing of
manufacturing processes by domestic manufacturers; shift by customers to fewer
and larger suppliers; increased customer demand for higher quality products and
services; and consolidation of industry participants.

In recognition of these industry dynamics, the Company has focused on
achieving profitable growth through the start-up, acquisition, or joint venture
partnering of service centers, processors, and related businesses, and continued
investments in higher value-added processing equipment and services, while
continuing its commitment to expanding and improving its sales and servicing
efforts.

The Company is focused on specific operating objectives including: (i)
increasing tons sold; (ii) reducing controllable operating expenses; (iii)
generating positive cash flow to reduce debt; (iv) improving safety awareness;
(v) achieving specified on-time delivery and quality directives; and (vi)
maintaining inventory turnover of approximately five times per year. These
operating objectives are supported by:

(i) Flawless execution (Fe), which is an internal program that empowers
employees to achieve profitable growth by delivering superior customer
service and exceeding customer expectations.

(ii) A set of core values which is communicated and practiced throughout
the Company.

(iii) On-going business process enhancements and redesigns to improve
efficiencies and reduce costs.

(iv) Continued evolution of information and key metric reporting to focus
managers on achieving the specific operating objectives mentioned
above.

Olympic believes its depth of management, facilities locations, processing
capabilities, information systems, focus on quality and customer service,
extensive and experienced sales force, and supplier relationships provide a
strong foundation for implementation of its strategy and achievement of its
objectives. Certain elements of the Company's strategy are set forth in more
detail below.

INVESTMENT IN VALUE-ADDED PROCESSING EQUIPMENT. Olympic has invested in
processing equipment to support customer demand and to respond to the growing
trend among capital equipment manufacturers (its customers) to outsource
non-core production processes, such as plate processing, and to concentrate on
engineering, design and assembly. When the results of sales and marketing
efforts indicate that there is sufficient customer demand for a particular
product or service, the Company will purchase equipment to satisfy that demand.
The Company also evaluates its existing equipment to ensure that it remains
productive, and upgrades, replaces, redeploys, or disposes equipment when
necessary.

Investments in laser welding lines, precision machining equipment,
blankers, plate processing equipment and two customized temper mills with heavy
gauge cut to length lines have allowed the Company to further increase its
higher value-added processing services.

In the past three years, the Company has invested in two new slitters, one
for its Detroit operation, which became operational in 2000, and the other in
its Minneapolis Coil facility in 2002. Additional plate processing equipment was
installed at the Company's Minneapolis Plate facility in 2002 as well. The
Company believes it is

among the largest processors and distributors of steel plate in the United
States. As part of its evaluation of non-productive equipment, this new
equipment has replaced multiple pieces of older, less efficient equipment.

SALES AND MARKETING. The Company believes that its commitment to quality,
service, just-in-time delivery and field sales personnel has enabled it to build
and maintain strong customer relationships. The Company continuously analyzes
its customer base to ensure that strategic customers are properly targeted and
serviced, while focusing its efforts to supply and service its larger customers
on a national account basis. The national account program has successfully
resulted in selling to multi-location customers from multi-location Olympic
facilities. In addition, the Company offers business solutions to its customers
through value-added and value-engineered services. The Company also provides
inventory stocking programs and in-plant employees located at customer locations
to help reduce customers' costs.

The Company has a "Flawless execution" program (Fe), which is a commitment
to provide superior customer service while striving to exceed customer
expectations. The Fe program includes tracking actual on-time delivery and
quality performance against objectives, and initiatives to improve efficiencies
and streamline processes at each operation.

The Company believes its sales force is among the largest and most
experienced in the industry. The sales force makes direct daily sales calls to
customers throughout the continental United States. The continuous interaction
between the Company's sales force and active and prospective customers provides
the Company with valuable market information and sales opportunities, including
opportunities for outsourcing and increased sales.

The Company's sales efforts are further supported by metallurgical
engineers, technical service personnel, and product specialists who have
specific expertise in carbon and stainless steel, alloy plate and steel
fabrication. The Company's e-commerce initiatives include extranet pages for
specific customers, which are integrated with the Company's internal business
systems to provide cost efficiencies for both the Company and its customers.

ACQUISITIONS. Although the Company has focused on its internal operations
over the last four years, it has made seven acquisitions of other steel service
centers or processors since 1987. Its most recent acquisition was the June 1998
acquisition of JNT Precision Machining (JNT), a machining center now integrated
into the Company's Chambersburg, Pennsylvania operation.

INVESTMENTS IN JOINT VENTURES. The Company has expanded its selling and
processing capabilities for its customers by participating in the following two
joint venture relationships:

Olympic Laser Processing (OLP), a 50% owned joint venture, was formed in
1997 with the United States Steel Corporation (USS) to produce laser welded
sheet steel blanks for the automotive industry. OLP's Michigan facility is
equipped with two automated and two manual-feed laser-welding lines. A fifth
automated line has been purchased and is expected to be installed in the second
half of 2003. Demand for laser-welded parts is expected to continue growing due
to cost benefits and reduced scrap and auto body weight. OLP began operating
profitably in 2001.

The Company has a 49% ownership interest in G.S.P., LLC (GSP), a joint
venture in eastern Michigan to support the flat-rolled steel requirements of the
automotive industry as a Minority Business Enterprise. On April 1, 2002, Thomas
A. Goss and Gregory F. Goss, executive officers of the Goss Group, Inc., an
insurance enterprise, assumed 51% majority ownership interest from the venture's
previous majority owners. GSP is a certified member of the Michigan Minority
Business Development Council.

MANAGEMENT. The Company believes one of its strengths is the depth of its
management. In addition to its principal executive officers, the Company's
management team includes three Regional Vice Presidents, its Vice-Presidents of
Sales and Marketing, New Business Development, Operations Management, and Human
Resources, eight General Managers, its Directors of Materials Management and
Corporate Projects, its Credit Manager and its Corporate Controller. Members of
the management team have a diversity of backgrounds within the steel industry,
including management positions at steel producers and other steel service
centers. They average 22 years of experience in the steel industry and 10 years
with the Company.

PRODUCTS, PROCESSING SERVICES, AND QUALITY STANDARDS

The Company maintains a substantial inventory of coil and plate steel. Coil
is in the form of a continuous sheet, typically 36 to 96 inches wide, between
0.015 and 0.625 inches thick, and rolled into 10 to 30 ton coils. Because of the
size and weight of these coils and the equipment required to move and process
them into smaller sizes, such coils do not meet the requirements, without
further processing, of most customers. Plate is typically thicker than coil and
is processed by laser, plasma or oxygen burning.

Customer orders are entered or electronically transmitted into computerized
order entry systems, and appropriate inventory is then selected and scheduled
for processing in accordance with the customer's specified delivery date. The
Company attempts to maximize yield by combining customer orders for processing
each coil or plate to the fullest extent practicable.

The Company's services include both traditional service center processes of
cutting-to-length, slitting, and shearing and higher value-added processes of
blanking, tempering, plate burning, precision machining and laser welding to
process steel to specified lengths, widths and shapes pursuant to specific
customer orders. Cutting-to-length involves cutting steel along the width of the
coil. Slitting involves cutting steel to specified widths along the length of
the coil. Shearing is the process of cutting sheet steel. Blanking cuts the
steel into specific shapes with close tolerances. Tempering improves the
uniformity of the thickness and flatness of the steel through a cold rolling
process. Plate burning is the process of cutting steel into specific shapes and
sizes. The Company's machining activities include drilling, bending, milling,
tapping, boring and sawing. Laser welding of processed steel blanks is performed
by the Company's OLP joint venture. In 2002, the Company closed its tube
processing operation and ceased offering roll forming services to its customers.

The following table sets forth the major pieces of processing equipment in
operation by geographic region:

<Table>
<Caption>
(A) (B) (D)
PROCESSING EASTERN CENTRAL (C) JOINT
EQUIPMENT REGION REGION DETROIT VENTURES TOTAL
- ---------- ------- ------- ------- -------- -----

Cutting-to-length.................................... 8 5 2 15
Blanking presses..................................... 4 4
Tempering (e)........................................ 3 2 5
Plate processing..................................... 10 15 25
Slitting............................................. 4 2 2 1 9
Shearing............................................. 1 5 4 10
Machining............................................ 16 16
Shot blasting/grinding............................... 1 2 3
Laser welding........................................ 4 4
-- -- -- -- --
Total........................................... 43 31 8 9 91
== == == == ==
</Table>

- ---------------

(a) Consists of seven facilities located in Ohio, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and
Georgia.

(b) Consists of four facilities located in Illinois, Minnesota and Iowa.

(d) Consists of two facilities located in Michigan, primarily serving the
automotive industry.

(e) In addition to the temper mills located in Cleveland and Iowa, tempering
includes press brake equipment.

The Company's quality control system establishes controls and procedures
covering all aspects of its products from the time the material is ordered
through receipt, processing and shipment to the customer. These controls and
procedures encompass periodic supplier audits, meetings with customer advisory
boards, inspection criteria, traceability and certification. From time to time,
the Company has undergone quality audits by certain of its customers and has met
all requirements of those customers. In addition, the Philadelphia, Georgia, and
both Minneapolis operations are ISO 9002 certified. The Detroit operation has
earned Ford's Q1 quality rating, and is also QS-9000 certified. The GSP and OLP
joint ventures are also QS-9000 certified. The Company has a quality testing lab
adjacent to its temper mill facility in Cleveland.

CUSTOMERS AND DISTRIBUTION

The Company has a diversified customer and geographic base, which reduces
the inherent risk and cyclicality of its business. The concentration of net
sales to the Company's top 20 customers approximated 26% of net sales in 2002
compared to 27% in 2001. In addition, the Company's largest customer accounted
for approximately 4% of net sales in both 2002 and 2001. The Company serves
customers in most carbon steel consuming industries, including manufacturers and
fabricators of transportation and material handling equipment, automobiles,
construction and farm machinery, storage tanks, environmental and energy
generation equipment, appliances, food service and electrical equipment, as well
as general and plate fabricators, and steel service centers. Sales to the three
largest U.S. automobile manufacturers and their suppliers, made principally by
the Company's Detroit operation, and sales to other steel service centers,
accounted for approximately 17% and 13%, respectively, of the Company's net
sales in 2002, and 15% and 11% of net sales in 2001.

While the Company ships products throughout the United States, most of its
customers are located in the midwestern, eastern and southern regions of the
United States. Most domestic customers are located within a 250-mile radius of
one of the Company's processing facilities, thus enabling an efficient delivery
system capable of handling a high frequency of short lead-time orders. The
Company transports most of its products directly to customers via dedicated
independent trucking firms. Products sold to foreign customers are shipped
either directly from the steel producers to the customer or to an intermediate
processor, and then to the customer by rail, truck or ocean carrier.

The Company processes its steel to specific customer orders as well as for
stock. Many of the Company's larger customers commit to purchase on a regular
basis at fixed prices ranging from three to twelve months. To mitigate price
volatility risks these fixed price commitments are generally matched with
corresponding supply arrangements. Customers notify the Company of specific
release dates as the processed products are required. Customers typically notify
the Company of release dates anywhere from a just-in-time basis up to three
weeks before the release date. Therefore, the Company is required to carry
sufficient inventory to meet the short lead time and just-in-time delivery
requirements of its customers.

SUPPLIERS

Olympic concentrates on developing manufacturer to distributor
relationships with high-quality steel producers, using a coordinated effort to
be the customer of choice for business critical suppliers. The Company employs
sourcing strategies maximizing the quality, production and transportation
economies of a global supply base. Olympic is an important customer of
flat-rolled coil and plate for many of its principal suppliers, but is not
dependent on any one supplier. The Company purchases in bulk from steel
producers in quantities that are efficient for such producers. This enables the
Company to maintain a continued source of supply at what it believes to be
competitive prices. Olympic believes the accessibility and proximity of its
facilities to major domestic steel producers, combined with its long-standing
and continuous prompt pay practices, will continue to be an important factor in
maintaining strong relationships with steel suppliers. The Company purchases
flat-rolled steel at regular intervals from a number of domestic and foreign
producers of primary steel. The steel producing supply base continues to
consolidate, and the Company believes that its relationships with its suppliers
are good. The Company has no long-term commitments with any of its suppliers.
The Company purchased approximately 11% and 16% of its total steel requirements
from its single largest supplier in 2002 and 2001, respectively.

COMPETITION

The principal markets served by the Company are highly competitive. The
Company competes with other regional and national steel service centers, single
location service centers and, to a certain degree, steel producers and
intermediate steel processors on a regional basis. The Company has different
competitors for each of its products and within each region. The Company
competes on the basis of price, product selection and availability, customer
service, quality and geographic proximity. Certain of the Company's competitors
have more flexibility and greater financial and operating resources than the
Company.

With the exception of certain Canadian operations, foreign-located steel
service centers are generally not a material competitive factor in the Company's
principal domestic markets.
6

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Information systems are a critical component of Olympic's strategy. The
Company has invested in technologies and human resources required in this area.
The Company believes that its information systems provide it with an advantage
over smaller competitors with less resources than Olympic. The Company's
information systems focus on the following core application areas:

INVENTORY MANAGEMENT. The Company's information systems track the status
of inventories in all locations on a daily basis. This information is essential
in allowing the Company to closely monitor and manage its inventory.

DIFFERENTIATED SERVICES TO CUSTOMERS. The Company's information systems
allow it to provide value-added services to customers, including quality control
and on-time delivery monitoring and reporting, just-in-time inventory management
and shipping services and EDI communications.

INTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS. The Company believes that its ability to quickly
and efficiently share information across its operations is critical to the
Company's success. The Company has invested in various communications and
workgroup technologies which enable employees to remain effective and
responsive.

E-COMMERCE AND ADVANCED CUSTOMER INTERACTION. The Company is actively
involved in electronic commerce initiatives, including both Company-sponsored
initiatives and participation in customer e-procurement initiatives. Olympic has
implemented extranet sites for specific customers, which are integrated with the
Company's internal business systems to streamline the costs and time associated
with processing electronic transactions.

The Company continues to actively seek opportunities to utilize information
technologies to reduce costs and improve services within Olympic and across the
steel supply chain. This includes working with individual steel producers and
customers, and participating in industry sponsored groups to develop information
processing standards to benefit those in the supply chain.

In 2002, the Company suspended its project to implement a new internally
developed management information system. The project was initiated to integrate
the Company's existing three business systems into a common foundation. As a
result of this decision, the Company recorded $1.7 million of accelerated
depreciation in the fourth quarter of 2002.

EMPLOYEES

At December 31, 2002, the Company employed 837 people. Approximately 230 of
the Company's hourly plant personnel at the Minneapolis and Detroit facilities
are represented by four separate collective bargaining units. The collective
bargaining agreement covering the Company's Minneapolis plate processing
facility expires on March 31, 2003, and the agreement covering Detroit's hourly
plant employees expires June 30, 2004.

In October 2002, the Company's collective bargaining agreement covering its
Minneapolis coil processing facility was renewed to September 30, 2005. The
Company's collective bargaining agreement covering its Detroit hourly plant
maintenance personnel (7 employees) expired on July 31, 2002. Employees covered
under this agreement continue to operate as a new agreement is negotiated. While
the Company expects to be able to negotiate a new agreement, there can be no
assurance that such a resolution will occur. The Company has never experienced a
work stoppage and believes that its relationship with its employees is good.
However, any prolonged disruption in business arising from work stoppages by
Company personnel represented by collective bargaining units could have a
material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations.

SERVICE MARKS, TRADE NAMES AND PATENTS

The Company conducts its business under the name "Olympic Steel." A
provision of federal law grants exclusive rights to the word "Olympic" to the
U.S. Olympic Committee. The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized, however, that
certain users may be able to continue to use the word based on long-term and
continuous use. The Company has used the name Olympic Steel since 1954, but is
prevented from registering the name "Olympic" and from being qualified to do
business as a foreign corporation under that name in certain
7

states. In such states, the Company has registered under different names,
including "Oly Steel" and "Olympia Steel." The Company's wholly-owned
subsidiary, Olympic Steel Lafayette, Inc., does business in certain states under
the names "Lafayette Steel and Processing" and "Lafayette Steel," and the
Company's operation in Georgia does business under the name "Southeastern Metal
Processing." The Company's web site is located at http://www.olysteel.com.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

The Company's operations are governed by many laws and regulations,
including those relating to workplace safety and worker health, principally the
Occupational Safety and Health Act and regulations thereunder. The Company
believes that it is in material compliance with these laws and regulations and
does not believe that future compliance with such laws and regulations will have
a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition.

ENVIRONMENTAL

The Company's facilities are subject to certain federal, state and local
requirements relating to the protection of the environment. The Company believes
that it is in material compliance with all environmental laws, does not
anticipate any material expenditures to meet environmental requirements and does
not believe that compliance with such laws and regulations will have a material
adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition.

CYCLICALITY IN THE STEEL INDUSTRY; IMPACT OF CHANGING STEEL PRICES

The principal raw material used by the Company is flat-rolled carbon and
stainless steel that the Company typically purchases from steel producers. The
steel industry as a whole is cyclical, and pricing and availability in the steel
industry can be volatile due to numerous factors beyond the control of the
Company, including general, domestic and international economic conditions,
labor costs, production levels, competition, steel import levels, import duties
and tariffs and currency exchange rates. This volatility can significantly
affect the availability and cost of steel for the Company.

Steel service centers maintain substantial inventories of steel to
accommodate the short lead times and just-in-time delivery requirements of their
customers. Accordingly, the Company purchases steel in an effort to maintain its
inventory at levels that it believes to be appropriate to satisfy the
anticipated needs of its customers based upon historic buying practices,
contracts with customers and market conditions. The Company's commitments for
steel purchases are generally at prevailing market prices in effect at the time
the Company places its orders. The Company has no long-term, fixed-price steel
purchase contracts. When raw material prices increase, competitive conditions
will influence how much of the steel price increases can be passed on to the
Company's customers. When raw material prices decline, customer demands for
lower prices could result in lower sale prices and, as the Company uses existing
steel inventory, lower gross margins. Changing steel prices therefore could
adversely affect the Company's net sales, gross margins and net income.

CYCLICALITY OF DEMAND; SALES TO THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY

Certain of the Company's products are sold to industries that experience
significant fluctuations in demand based on economic conditions or other matters
beyond the control of the Company. The Company's diversified customer and
geographic base reduce such cyclicality; however, no assurance can be given that
the Company will be able to increase or maintain its level of sales in periods
of economic stagnation or downturn.

Sales of the Company's products for use in the automotive industry
accounted for approximately 17% and 15% of the Company's net sales in 2002 and
2001, respectively. Such sales include sales directly to automotive
manufacturers and to manufacturers of automotive components and parts. The
automotive industry experiences significant fluctuations in demand based on
numerous factors such as general economic conditions and consumer confidence.
The automotive industry is also subject, from time to time, to labor work
stoppages. Any prolonged disruption in business arising from work stoppages by
automotive manufacturers or by steel manufacturers could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's results of operations.
8

EFFECTS OF INFLATION AND PRICING FLUCTUATIONS

Inflation generally affects the Company by increasing the cost of employee
wages and benefits, transportation services, processing equipment, purchased
steel, energy, and borrowings under the Company's credit facility. Inflation has
not had a material effect on the Company's financial results during the past
three years. When raw material prices decline, customer demands for lower costed
product result in lower selling prices. Declining steel prices have generally
adversely affected the Company's net sales and net income over the past three
years.

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This document contains various forward-looking statements and information
that are based on management's beliefs as well as assumptions made by and
information currently available to management. When used in this document, the
words "anticipate," "expect," "believe," "estimated," "project," "plan" and
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which
are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks,
uncertainties and assumptions including, but not limited to: general business,
economic and political conditions; competitive factors such as the availability
and pricing of steel and fluctuations in customer demand; layoffs or work
stoppages by the Company's, suppliers', or customers' personnel; equipment
malfunctions or installation delays; the adequacy of information technology and
business system software investment; the successes of its joint ventures; the
successes of the Company's strategic efforts and initiatives to increase sales
volumes, improve cash flows and reduce debt, maintain or improve inventory turns
and reduce its costs; and customer, supplier, and competitor consolidation or
insolvency. Should one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties
materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results
may vary materially from those anticipated, expected, believed, estimated,
projected or planned. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company
undertakes no obligation to republish revised forward-looking statements to
reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or circumstances after the date
hereof.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company believes that its properties are strategically situated
relative to its domestic suppliers, its customers and each other, allowing the
Company to support customers from multiple locations. This permits the Company
to provide inventory and processing services, which are available at one
operation but not another. Steel is shipped from the most advantageous facility,
regardless of where the order was taken. The facilities are located in the hubs
of major steel consumption markets, and within a 250-mile radius of most of the
Company's

customers, a distance approximating the one-day driving and delivery limit for
truck shipments. The following table sets forth certain information concerning
the Company's principal properties:

<Table>
<Caption>
SQUARE OWNED OR
OPERATION LOCATION FEET FUNCTION LEASED
- --------- ------------------------ ------- ----------------------------- ---------

Cleveland Bedford Heights, 127,000 Corporate headquarters and Owned
Ohio (1) coil processing and
distribution center
Bedford Heights, 121,500 Coil processing, distribution Owned
Ohio (1) center and offices
Bedford Heights, 59,500 Plate processing, Leased(2)
Ohio (1) distribution center and
offices
Minneapolis Plymouth, Minnesota 196,800 Coil processing, distribution Owned
center and offices
Plymouth, Minnesota 112,200 Plate processing, Owned
distribution center and
offices
Lafayette Detroit, Michigan 256,000 Coil processing, distribution Owned
center and offices
South Winder, Georgia 240,000 Coil processing, distribution Owned
center and offices
Iowa Bettendorf, Iowa 190,000 Coil and plate processing, Owned
distribution center and
offices
Connecticut Milford, Connecticut 134,000 Coil and plate processing, Owned
distribution center and
offices
Philadelphia Lester, Pennsylvania 92,500 Plate processing, Leased
distribution center and
offices
Chambersburg Chambersburg, 87,000 Plate processing and Owned
Pennsylvania machining, distribution
center and offices
Chicago Schaumburg, Illinois (3) 80,500 Coil processing, distribution Owned
center and offices
</Table>

- ---------------

(1) The Bedford Heights facilities are all adjacent properties.

(2) This facility is leased from a related party pursuant to the terms of a
triple net lease for $195,300 per year. The lease was renewed in June 2000
for a 10-year term, with one remaining renewal option for an additional 10
years.

(3) In 2000, the Company consolidated its Chicago operations in the Schaumburg,
Illinois facility. The Company's former Elk Grove Village, Illinois facility
was sold in 2002.

The Company owns a 118,000 square foot facility in Cleveland, Ohio that
previously housed its roll forming operation, which was discontinued in 2002.
This facility is included in "Assets Held for Sale" on the accompanying December
31, 2002 consolidated balance sheet.

The Company's international sales office is located in Jacksonville,
Florida. The Company also participates in two joint ventures which each own a
facility in Michigan. All of the properties listed in the table as owned are
subject to mortgages securing the Company's debt agreements. Management believes
that the Company will be able to accommodate its capacity needs for the
immediate future at its existing facilities.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is party to various legal actions that it believes are ordinary
in nature and incidental to the operation of its business. In the opinion of
management, the outcome of the proceedings to which the Company is currently a
party will not have a material adverse effect upon its operations or financial
condition.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

This information is included in this Report pursuant to Instruction 3 of
Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K. The following is a list of the executive officers
of the Company and a brief description of their business experience. Each
executive officer will hold office until his successor is chosen and qualified.

Michael D. Siegal, age 50, has served as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company since 1984, and as Chairman of the Board of Directors since 1994. From
1984 until January 2001, he also served as President. He has been employed by
the Company in a variety of capacities since 1974. Mr. Siegal is a member of the
Board of Directors of the Metals Service Center Institute (MSCI). He previously
served as National Chairman of Israel Bonds and presently serves as Vice
Chairman of the Development Corporation for Israel and as an officer for the
Cleveland Jewish Community Federation. He is also a member of the Board of
Directors of American National Bank (Cleveland, Ohio).

David A. Wolfort, age 50, has served as President since January 2001 and
Chief Operating Officer since 1995. He has been a director of the Company since
1987. He previously served as Vice President Commercial from 1987 to 1995, after
having joined the Company in 1984 as General Manager. Prior to joining the
Company, Mr. Wolfort spent eight years with Sharon Steel, a primary steel
producer, in a variety of sales assignments. Mr. Wolfort is the Chairman of
MSCI's Political Action Committee and serves as Past Chairman of MSCI's
Governmental Affairs Committee. He is also a member of the Northern Ohio
Regional Board of the Anti-Defamation League.

Richard T. Marabito, age 39, serves as the Company's Chief Financial
Officer (CFO). He also served as Treasurer from 1994 through 2002. He joined the
Company in 1994 as Corporate Controller and served in this capacity until being
named CFO in March 2000. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Marabito served as
Corporate Controller for Waxman Industries, Inc., a publicly traded wholesale
distribution company. Mr. Marabito is a certified public accountant, and was
employed from 1985 to 1990 by Arthur Andersen LLP in its audit division. Mr.
Marabito also serves as a director for the Company's OLP LLC joint venture, and
is a member of the Board of Trustees for the MSCI's Foundation for Continuing
Education.

Heber MacWilliams, age 59, serves as Chief Information Officer, and has
been employed by the Company since 1994. Prior to joining the Company, Mr.
MacWilliams spent 14 years as partner in charge of management consulting at
Walthall & Drake, a public accounting firm in Cleveland, Ohio. Mr. MacWilliams
is also a member of the faculty of the Weatherhead School of Management at Case
Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio.

Richard A. Manson, age 34, has served as the Company's Treasurer since
January 2003, and has been employed by the Company since 1996. From 1996 through
2002, he served as Director of Taxes and Risk Management. Prior to joining the
Company, Mr. Manson was employed for seven years by Arthur Andersen LLP in its
tax department. Mr. Manson is a certified public accountant.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK

The Company's Common Stock trades on the Nasdaq National Market under the
symbol "ZEUS." The following table sets forth, for each quarter in the two year
period ended December 31, 2002, the high and low closing prices of the Company's
Common Stock as reported by the Nasdaq National Market:

<Table>
<Caption>
2002 2001
------------- -------------
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
----- ----- ----- -----

First quarter.................................. $6.05 $2.40 $3.06 $1.94
Second quarter................................. 6.15 5.05 4.24 2.16
Third quarter.................................. 6.57 2.82 4.05 2.95
Fourth quarter................................. 3.99 2.72 3.95 2.15
</Table>

HOLDERS OF RECORD

On March 10, 2003, the Company believed there were approximately 2,500
beneficial holders of the Company's Common Stock.

DIVIDENDS

The Company presently retains all of its earnings, and anticipates that all
of its future earnings will be retained to finance the expansion or upgrading of
its business. The Company does not anticipate paying cash dividends on its
Common Stock in the foreseeable future. Any determination to pay cash dividends
in the future will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors after taking
into account various factors, including the Company's financial condition,
results of operations, current and anticipated cash needs, plans for expansion
and current restrictions under the Company's credit agreement.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected data of the Company for each of the
five years in the period ended December 31, 2002. The data presented should be
read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations" and the consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

<Table>
<Caption>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

TONS SOLD DATA:
Direct................................ 1,004 936 1,008 1,033 1,043
Toll (a).............................. 154 131 165 207 231
Total.............................. 1,158 1,067 1,173 1,240 1,274

INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
Net sales (a)........................... $459,384 $404,803 $505,522 $509,882 $562,020
Cost of sales........................... 355,231 307,136 398,652 387,798 443,594
Gross margin............................ 104,153 97,667 106,870 122,084 118,426
Operating expenses (b).................. 98,315 94,796 107,571 108,934 123,272
Operating income (loss)................. 5,838 2,871 (701) 13,150 (4,846)
Income (loss) from joint ventures....... 606 (160) (1,425) (1,032) (322)
Interest and other expense on debt...... 8,071 6,473 5,623 3,615 3,295
Receivable securitization expense....... -- 1,260 3,724 3,119 3,773
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes and cumulative
effect of a change in accounting
principle............................. (1,627) (5,022) (11,473) 5,384 (12,236)
Income tax benefit (provision).......... 626 1,933 3,728 (2,072) 3,976
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of a change
in accounting principle............... (1,001) (3,089) (7,745) 3,312 (8,260)
Loss from discontinued tube operation,
net of income tax benefit (c)......... (2,641) (559) (976) (153) (171)
Income (loss) before cumulative effect
of a change in accounting principle... (3,642) (3,648) (8,721) 3,159 (8,431)
Cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle, net of income
tax benefit (d)....................... (2,117) -- -- -- --
Net income (loss)....................... ($5,759) ($3,648) ($8,721) $3,159 ($8,431)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per
share................................. ($0.60) ($0.38) ($0.90) $0.30 ($0.79)
Weighted average shares outstanding..... 9,637 9,588 9,677 10,452 10,692

BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Current assets (e)...................... $162,686 $117,240 $103,837 $137,513 $132,080
Current liabilities..................... 43,962 32,455 32,672 36,248 43,225
Working capital (e)..................... 118,724 84,785 71,165 101,265 88,855
Total assets (e)........................ 262,911 235,386 224,929 267,007 256,108
Total debt (e).......................... 106,793 84,499 68,009 93,426 76,520
Shareholders' equity.................... 115,495 121,243 124,920 136,820 137,743
</Table>

- ---------------

(a) Net sales generated from toll tons sold represented less than 3% of
consolidated net sales for all years presented.

(b) 2000 and 1998 operating expenses include asset impairment charges of $1,178
and $19,056, respectively.

(c) In June 2002, the Company decided to close its unprofitable tube processing
operation (Tubing) in Cleveland, Ohio. In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, "Accounting for the

Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," Tubing has been accounted for
as a discontinued operation. As a result, Tubing's after-tax losses are
shown separate from the Company's results from continuing operations.

(d) As a result of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," the Company wrote-off its
entire goodwill amount in 2002 as a cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle.

(e) 2000, 1999, and 1998 reflect the sale of $48,000, $52,000, and $57,000,
respectively, of accounts receivable under the Company's former accounts
receivable securitization program which was terminated in June 2001.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company's discussion and analysis of its financial condition and
results of operations are based upon the Company's consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results could
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. On an
ongoing basis, the Company monitors and evaluates its estimates and assumptions.

The Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its
more significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of its consolidated
financial statements:

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated
losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments.
The allowance is maintained at a level considered appropriate based on
historical experience and specific customer collection issues that the Company
has identified. Estimation of such losses requires adjusting historical loss
experience for current economic conditions and judgments about the probable
effects of economic conditions on certain customers. The Company can not
guarantee that the rate of future credit losses will be similar to past
experience. The Company considers all available information when assessing each
quarter the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts.

Inventory Valuation

The Company's inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and
include the costs of the purchased steel, internal and external processing, and
inbound freight. Cost is determined using the specific identification method.
The Company regularly reviews its inventory on hand and records provisions for
obsolete and slow-moving inventory based on historical and current sales trends.
Changes in product demand and the Company's customer base may affect the value
of inventory on hand, which may require higher provisions for obsolete or
slow-moving inventory.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets and the
related estimated remaining lives whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Events or changes in
circumstances which could trigger an impairment review include significant
underperformance relative to the expected historical or projected future
operating results, significant changes in the manner of the use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for the overall business or significant negative industry
or economic trends. The Company records an impairment or change in useful life
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount
may not be recoverable or the useful life has changed.

Income Taxes

The Company records operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and the
estimated effect of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and
liabilities and the reported amounts in its consolidated balance sheets. The
Company follows detailed guidelines in each tax jurisdiction when reviewing tax
assets recorded on the balance sheet and provides for valuation allowances as
required. Deferred tax assets are reviewed for recoverability based on
historical taxable income, the expected reversals of existing temporary
differences, tax planning strategies and, most importantly, on projections of
future taxable income. The projections of future taxable income require
assumptions regarding volume, selling prices, gross margins, expense levels and
industry cyclicality. If the Company is unable to generate sufficient future
taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions, the Company will be required to
record a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.

OVERVIEW

The Company's results of operations are affected by numerous external
factors, such as general business, economic and political conditions,
competition, steel pricing and availability, energy prices, customer demand for
steel, and layoffs or work stoppages by suppliers' or customers' personnel.

Olympic sells a broad range of products, many of which have different gross
margins. Products that have more value-added processing generally have a greater
gross margin. Accordingly, the Company's overall gross margin is affected by
product mix and the amount of processing performed, as well as volatility in
selling prices and material purchase costs.

The Company performs toll processing of customer-owned steel, the majority
of which is performed by its Detroit and Georgia operations. Toll processing
generally results in lower selling prices and gross margin dollars per ton but
higher gross margin percentages than the Company's direct sales. Net sales
dollars generated from toll processing represented less than 3% of consolidated
net sales in each of the last 3 years.

The Company's two joint ventures include: Olympic Laser Processing (OLP), a
company that processes laser welded sheet steel blanks for the automotive
industry; and G.S.P., LLC (GSP), a certified Minority Business Enterprise
company supporting the flat-rolled steel requirements of the automotive
industry. The Company's 50% interest in OLP and 49% interest in GSP are
accounted for under the equity method. The Company guarantees portions of
outstanding debt under both of the joint venture companies' bank credit
facilities. As of December 31, 2002, Olympic guaranteed 50% of OLP's $17.3
million and 49% of GSP's $1.5 million of outstanding debt on a several basis.

Financing costs historically included interest and financing fees on debt
and costs associated with the Company's accounts receivable securitization
program (the Financing Costs). In connection with its June 2001 debt
refinancing, the Company's accounts receivable securitization program was
terminated, resulting in the repurchase of $42.0 million of accounts receivable
previously sold. Receivable securitization costs were based on commercial paper
rates calculated on the amount of receivables sold.

The Company sells certain products internationally, primarily in Puerto
Rico and Mexico. All international sales and payments are made in United States
dollars. These sales historically involve the Company's direct representation of
steel producers and may be covered by letters of credit or trade receivable
insurance. Typically, international sales are more transactional in nature with
lower gross margins than domestic sales. Domestic steel producers generally
supply domestic customers before meeting foreign demand, particularly during
periods of supply constraints. International sales have represented less than 3%
of net sales in each of the last three years.

In June 2002, the Company decided to close its unprofitable tube processing
operation (Tubing) in Cleveland, Ohio. In accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 144 (SFAS No. 144), "Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," Tubing has been accounted for as a discontinued
operation. As a result, Tubing's after-tax operating losses of $1.0 million for
the first six months of 2002, and $559 thousand and $976 thousand for fiscal
years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, are shown separate from
the Company's results from continuing operations. In addition, a $1.6 million
after-tax charge for the costs of the Tubing closure is included in the 2002
consolidated statement of income. This non-cash charge primarily relates to the
write down of Tubing's property and equipment to estimated fair value less costs
to sell. The fair value of the Tubing property and equipment was determined by
independent appraisal. In December 2002, the Company sold the Tubing equipment
for $1.3 million (its approximate appraised value) and used the proceeds from
the sale to reduce debt. The Tubing real estate is recorded as "Assets Held for
Sale" on the accompanying December 31, 2002 consolidated balance sheet for $837
thousand. The Company anticipates selling the Tubing real estate during 2003 and
will use the proceeds to reduce debt. Substantially all of Tubing's working
capital was liquidated prior to December 31, 2002.

Because the Company conducts its operations generally on the basis of
short-term orders, backlog is not a meaningful indicator of future performance.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth certain income statement data expressed as a
percentage of net sales:

<Table>
<Caption>
2002 2001 2000
------ ------ ------

Net sales.......................................... 100.00 100.00 100.00
Cost of sales...................................... 77.33 75.87 78.86
------ ------ ------
Gross margin..................................... 22.67 24.13 21.14
Operating expenses before asset impairment
charge........................................... 21.40 23.42 21.05
Asset impairment charge............................ -- -- 0.23
------ ------ ------
Operating income (loss).......................... 1.27 .71 (0.14)
Income (loss) from joint ventures.................. 0.13 (0.04) (0.28)
Financing costs.................................... 1.76 1.91 1.85
------ ------ ------
Loss from continuing operations before income
taxes and cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle.......................... (0.36) (1.24) (2.27)
Income tax benefit................................. 0.14 0.48 0.74
------ ------ ------
Loss from continuing operations before cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle.... (0.22) (0.76) (1.53)
Discontinued operations............................ (0.57) (0.14) (0.20)
------ ------ ------
Loss before cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle.......................... (0.79) (0.90) (1.73)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle........................................ (0.46) -- --
------ ------ ------
Net loss......................................... (1.25) (0.90) (1.73)
====== ====== ======
</Table>

2002 COMPARED TO 2001

Tons sold increased 8.6% to 1,158 in 2002 from 1,067 in 2001. Tons sold in
2002 included 1,004 thousand from direct sales and 154 thousand from toll
processing, compared with 936 thousand from direct sales and 131 thousand from
toll processing in 2001. The increases in direct and toll tons sold were
primarily attributable to the Company's automotive customer base. The Company
experienced a decline in customer demand in the fourth quarter of 2002, which
has continued in the first quarter of 2003.

Net sales increased $54.6 million, or 13.5%, to $459.4 million in 2002 from
$404.8 million in 2001. Average selling prices increased 4.5% in 2002 from 2001.

As a percentage of net sales, gross margin decreased to 22.7% in 2002 from
24.1% in 2001. In the first nine months of 2002, the Company experienced
significant increases in its material purchase costs as a result of tightening
steel supply caused by the idling or closure of domestic steel production
facilities as well as U.S. government imposed import restrictions placed on
certain steel products. However, during the fourth quarter of 2002, material
purchase costs declined as demand for steel weakened. Although the Company has
generally been successful in passing on price increases to its customers,
competitive pressures on pricing in its market segments have resulted in lower
gross margins compared to last year.

Operating expenses increased $3.5 million, or 3.7%, to $98.3 million in
2002 from $94.8 million in 2001. Operating expenses in 2002 included a $1.7
million accelerated depreciation charge for previously capitalized software
development costs associated with suspension of the Company's internal business
system development project. Excluding this charge, operating expenses in 2002
increased 2.0% from 2001. This operating expense increase was the result of
increased sales volumes. As a percentage of net sales, operating expenses in
2002 decreased to 21.4% from 23.4% in the comparable 2001 period. On a per ton
sold basis, operating expenses in 2002 decreased to $84.88 from $88.84 in 2001.
Excluding the accelerated depreciation charge, operating expenses totaled 21.0%
of net sales or $83.45 per ton sold in 2002.

Income from joint ventures totaled $606 thousand in 2002, compared to a
loss of $160 thousand in 2001. OLP contributed $721 thousand of income in 2002
compared to a loss of $192 thousand in 2001. GSP losses totaled $115 thousand in
2002, compared to income of $32 thousand in 2001.

Financing costs increased $338 thousand, or 4.4%, to $8.1 million in 2002
from $7.7 million in 2001. During the third quarter of 2002, the Company's then
existing credit facility was amended to allow the Company to prepay and
permanently reduce $10.0 million of higher cost term debt. The Company borrowed
$10.0 million from the revolver component of its credit facility to pay down the
term debt. In connection with the prepayment, the agent bank waived $617
thousand of deferred pay interest, which the Company previously expensed. On
December 30, 2002, the Company completed a refinancing of its credit facility.
In connection with the refinancing, the prior agent bank waived an additional
$861 thousand of deferred pay interest, which the Company previously expensed.
Both of the waivers of deferred pay interest have been recorded as a reduction
to interest and other expense on debt in 2002, offset by $2.1 million of
accelerated non-cash deferred financing fee amortization related to the early
termination of the refinanced debt. The Company's average borrowing rate
decreased to 5.7% in 2002 from 8.8% in 2001. Average borrowings levels declined
approximately $5.4 million between years.

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effect
of a change in accounting principle totaled $1.6 million in 2002 compared to
$5.0 million in 2001. An income tax benefit of 38.5% was recorded for both 2002
and 2001.

Loss from the discontinued Tubing operation, net of a 38.5% income tax
benefit, totaled $1.0 million and $559 thousand for 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Loss on disposition of the discontinued Tubing operation, net of a 38.5% income
tax benefit, totaled $1.6 million in 2002. This non-cash charge primarily
relates to the write down of Tubing's property and equipment to estimated fair
value less costs to sell.

Included in the Company's 2002 net loss is an after-tax charge of $2.1
million from the Company's adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board
Statement No. 142 (SFAS No. 142), "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets."

Net loss totaled $5.8 million, or $.60 per share in 2002, compared to a net
loss of $3.6 million, or $.38 per share in 2001.

The 2002 net loss includes the non-cash, after-tax effects of $1.0 million
for accelerated depreciation, $1.3 million for accelerated deferred financing
fee amortization, $1.6 million to write-down Tubing's property and equipment,
and $2.1 million to write-off goodwill.

Weighted average shares outstanding totaled 9.6 million in both 2002 and
2001.

2001 COMPARED TO 2000

Tons sold decreased 9.0% to 1,067 in 2001 from 1,173 thousand in 2000. Tons
sold in 2001 included 936 thousand from direct sales and 131 thousand from toll
processing, compared with 1,008 thousand from direct sales and 165 thousand from
toll processing in 2000. The decreases in direct and toll tons sold were
attributable to depressed customer demand across substantially all markets
served by the Company.

Net sales decreased $100.7 million, or 19.9%, to $404.8 million in 2001
from $505.5 million in 2000. Average selling prices decreased 12.0% due to
depressed steel pricing. In 2001, average domestic hot-rolled prices declined
approximately 25% over 2000, and reached a 30-year low by the end of 2001.

As a percentage of net sales, gross margin increased to 24.1% in 2001 from
21.1% in 2000. The increase reflected the benefit of lower raw material costs in
2001 and the Company's reduction of its inventory levels in 2000.

Operating expenses in 2001 decreased $12.8 million, or 11.9%, to $94.8
million in 2001 from $107.6 million in 2000. Operating expenses in 2000 included
a $1.2 million asset impairment charge and a $1.5 million charge to increase
accounts receivable reserves for collectibility concerns. Excluding the charges
in 2000, operating expenses decreased $10.1 million or 9.6%. Warehouse and
processing expense combined with

distribution expense declined $7.6 million or 14.3% in 2001, primarily as a
result of managing variable costs associated with the decrease in tons sold as
well as workforce reductions implemented over the course of 2001. Administrative
and general expense decreased $2.1 million or 8.0% due to the cost reduction
efforts of the Company and the absence of over $600 thousand of non-recurring
consulting fees incurred in 2000. On a per ton basis excluding the 2000 charges,
operating expenses decreased .7% to $88.84 in 2001 from $89.45 in 2000. As a
percentage of net sales excluding the charges in 2000, operating expenses
increased to 23.4% in 2001 from 20.7% in 2000, primarily as a result of
depressed selling prices.

Loss from joint ventures totaled $160 thousand in 2001 compared to $1.4
million in 2000. The Company's share of OLP losses totaled $192 thousand in 2001
compared to $1.4 million in 2000. OLP began operating profitably over the last
nine months of 2001. GSP contributed $32 thousand of income in 2001 compared to
losses of $67 thousand in 2000.

Financing Costs decreased $1.6 million, or 17.3%, to $7.7 million in 2001
from $9.3 million in 2000. The decrease between years was attributable to a
$36.0 million reduction in average borrowing levels. The Company's effective
bank borrowing rate increased to 8.8% from 8.3% in 2000.

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes for 2001 totaled $5.0
million compared to $11.5 million in 2000. An income tax benefit of 38.5% was
recorded in 2001, compared to a 32.5% benefit in 2000. The lower tax rate in
2000 was primarily attributable to a valuation reserve against the realizability
of certain tax assets.

Loss from the discontinued Tubing operation, net of a 38.5% income tax
benefit in 2001 and a 32.5% income tax benefit in 2000, totaled $559 thousand
and $976 thousand, respectively.

Net loss totaled $3.6 million, or $.38 per share in 2001, compared to a net
loss of $8.7 million, or $.90 per share in 2000.

Weighted average shares outstanding totaled 9.6 million in 2001, compared
to 9.7 million in 2000.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company's principal capital requirements are to fund its working
capital needs, the purchase and upgrading of processing equipment and
facilities, and its investments in joint ventures. The Company uses cash
generated from operations, leasing transactions, and its credit facility to fund
these requirements.

Working capital at December 31, 2002 increased $33.9 million from the end
of 2001. The increase is primarily attributable to a $29.6 million increase in
inventory and an $8.9 million increase in accounts receivable, due to increased
steel costs and selling prices.

Net cash from operating activities primarily represents net losses plus
non-cash charges for depreciation, amortization and income or losses from joint
ventures, as well as changes in working capital. During 2002, $19.5 million of
net cash was used for operating activities, consisting of $15.3 million of cash
generated from earnings and non-cash items less $34.9 million of cash used for
working capital purposes.

Net cash generated from investing activities in 2002 totaled $125 thousand,
consisting of $1.6 million of proceeds from the disposal of the Company's Elk
Grove, Illinois real estate and certain other equipment, offset by $1.5 million
of capital spending. Capital spending in 2002 was limited to information
technology and upgrades to the Company's existing buildings and equipment. The
Company has entered into operating leases for the acquisitions of new processing
equipment in Minneapolis. Capital spending for 2003 is expected to be less than
$2 million, primarily for building and equipment upgrades.

Cash flows from financing activities totaled $20.1 million, and primarily
consisted of $22.3 million of net borrowings on the Company's credit facility,
primarily used to fund working capital needs. The Company also incurred $2.2
million of new fees associated with its December 30, 2002 refinancing.

On December 30, 2002, the Company refinanced its 3-year, $125 million
secured financing agreement (the Refinanced Credit Facility) with a new 3-year,
$132 million secured bank-financing agreement (the New Credit Facility). The New
Credit Facility is expected to significantly reduce the Company's Financing
Costs. Funding
19

under the New Credit Facility occurred on January 2, 2003, and proceeds were
used to pay off outstanding borrowings under the Refinanced Credit Facility,
certain industrial revenue bonds and term debt. The Refinanced Credit Facility
was collateralized by the Company's accounts receivable, inventories, and
substantially all property and equipment. Borrowings under the Refinanced Credit
Facility were limited to the lesser of a borrowing base, comprised of eligible
receivables, inventories and property and equipment, or $125 million in the
aggregate. Borrowing rates under the Refinanced Credit Facility were based on
the agent bank's base rate or London Interbank Offered Rates (LIBOR) plus a
premium (the Premium).

The Refinanced Credit Facility required the Company to comply with various
covenants, the most significant of which included: (i) minimum excess
availability of $10 million, (ii) a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, (iii)
restrictions on additional indebtedness, and (iv) limitations on capital
expenditures. The Company was in compliance with all of its loan covenants
during 2002.

The New Credit Facility is collateralized by the Company's accounts
receivable, inventories, and substantially all property and equipment. The New
Credit Facility expires on December 15, 2005, with two additional annual
extensions at the banks' option. Revolver borrowings are limited to the lesser
of a borrowing base, comprised of eligible receivables and inventories, or $90
million in the aggregate. The Company has the option to borrow based on the
agent bank's base rate or Eurodollar Rates (EURO) plus a Premium. Each quarter,
the Premiums may increase or decrease based on the Company's debt service
coverage performance.

The New Credit Facility includes a $12 million equipment term loan and a
$30 million real estate term loan. Monthly term loan principal payments of $367
thousand commenced in February 2003.

The New Credit Facility requires the Company to comply with various
covenants, the most significant of which include: (i) minimum excess
availability of $10 million, tested monthly, (ii) a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio of 1.25, and maximum leverage ratio of 1.75, which are tested
quarterly commencing March 2003, (iii) restrictions on additional indebtedness,
and (iv) limitations on capital expenditures. Opening excess availability under
the New Credit Facility was approximately $22 million on January 2, 2003.

The Company incurred $2.2 million of New Credit Facility closing fees and
expenses, which have been capitalized and included in "Deferred Financing Fees,
Net" on the accompanying December 31, 2002 consolidated balance sheet. These
costs are amortized to interest and other expense on debt over the 3-year term
of the agreement.

The Company believes that funds available under its New Credit Facility,
together with funds generated from operations, will be sufficient to provide the
Company with the liquidity necessary to fund its anticipated working capital
requirements, capital expenditure requirements, and scheduled debt maturities
over the next 12 months. Capital requirements are subject to change as business
conditions warrant and opportunities arise.

IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (SFAS No. 141), "Business
Combinations" and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." SFAS No.
141 provides that all business combinations should be accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting and establishes criteria for the initial
recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets recorded in
connection with a business combination. The provisions of SFAS No. 141 apply to
all business combinations initiated or completed after June 30, 2001. The
Company will apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141 to any future business
combination. SFAS No. 142 addresses financial accounting and reporting for
acquired goodwill and other intangible assets. SFAS No. 142 requires that
goodwill no longer be amortized, but instead requires a transitional goodwill
impairment assessment and annual impairment tests thereafter. The Company
adopted SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002. See Note 1,"Goodwill," for the impact
of adoption of SFAS No. 142 on the Company's financial statements.

to expense using a systematic and rational approach over the estimated useful
life of the related asset. SFAS No. 143 became effective for the Company on
January 1, 2003. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 143 to
have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

In October 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144 (SFAS No. 144), "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets." SFAS No. 144 provides a single, comprehensive accounting
model for impairment and disposal of long-lived assets and discontinued
operations. The Company adopted SFAS No. 144 on January 1, 2002. See Note 2,
"Discontinued Operations," for the impact of adoption of SFAS No. 144 on the
Company's financial statements.

In April 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 145 (SFAS No. 145), "145 Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64,
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections," effective for
all fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002, which, among other changes and
technical corrections, rescinded SFAS No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from
Extinguishment of Debt." The Company does not expect the adoption of this SFAS
No. 145 to have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 146 (SFAS No. 146), "Accounting for Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No.
146 addresses issues related to the recognition, measurement, and reporting of
costs associated with exit and disposal activities including restructuring
activities. SFAS No. 146 became effective for disposal activities initiated
after January 1, 2003.

In 2002, the Company adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 148 (SFAS No. 148), "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation--Transition and Disclosure--an amendment of FASB Statement No.
123." SFAS No. 148 provides additional transition guidance for those entities
that elect to voluntarily adopt the accounting provisions of SFAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock Based Compensation." SFAS No. 148 does not change the
provisions of SFAS No. 123 that permit entities to continue to apply the
intrinsic value method of APB 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees." In
addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to
require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements
about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the
effect of the method used on reported results. The disclosure requirements are
included in the Company's 2002 financial statements, and the Company will
continue to utilize the intrinsic value method to account for stock-based
compensation.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46),
"Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities." FIN 46 addresses consolidation by
business enterprises of variable interest entities which possess certain
characteristics. The interpretation requires that if a business enterprise has a
controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity, the assets,
liabilities and results of operations of the variable interest entity must be
included in the consolidated financial statements with those of the business
enterprise. This interpretation applies immediately to variable interest
enterprises created after January 31, 2003 and to variable interest entities in
which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. For variable interest
entities created prior to January 31, 2003, this interpretation is effective for
the first year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company is
evaluating the classification of certain investments under FIN 46 on its
financial statements.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following table reflects the Company's contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2002. Open purchase orders for raw materials and supplies used in
the normal course of business have been excluded from the following table.

<Table>
<Caption>
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS 2007 AND
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS) 2003 2004 2005 2006 THEREAFTER
- ----------------------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ----------

Credit facility revolver....................... $ -- $ -- $57,560 $ -- $ --
Term loans and IRB's........................... 6,973 4,877 34,058 513 2,812
Operating leases............................... 1,389 1,297 695 648 1,522
------ ------ ------- ------ ------
Total contractual obligations................ $8,362 $6,174 $92,313 $1,161 $4,334
====== ====== ======= ====== ======
</Table>

As of December 31, 2002, Olympic guaranteed 50% of OLP's $17.3 million and
49% of GSP's $1.5 million of outstanding debt on a several basis.

ITEM 7A. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is exposed to the impact of interest rate changes and
fluctuating steel prices. The Company has not entered into any interest rate or
steel commodity hedge transactions for speculative purposes or otherwise.

Olympic's primary interest rate risk exposure results from variable rate
debt. If interest rates were to increase 100 basis points (1.0%) from December
31, 2002 rates, and assuming no changes in debt from December 31, 2002 levels,
the additional annual interest expense to the Company would be approximately
$1.0 million. The Company currently does not hedge its exposure to variable
interest rate risk. However, the Company has the option to enter into 30 to 180
day fixed base rate EURO loans under the New Credit Facility.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Shareholders and
the Board of Directors of
Olympic Steel, Inc.:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the
related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Olympic
Steel, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We
conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the
Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill effective January 1, 2002.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 14, 2003

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001, AND 2000
(in thousands, except per share data)

<Table>
<Caption>
2002 2001 2000
-------- -------- --------

Net sales................................................... $459,384 $404,803 $505,522
Cost of sales............................................... 355,231 307,136 398,652
-------- -------- --------
Gross margin.............................................. 104,153 97,667 106,870
Operating expenses
Warehouse and processing.................................. 30,063 30,016 34,362
Administrative and general................................ 24,008 24,506 26,649
Distribution.............................................. 17,319 15,524 18,791
Selling................................................... 12,884 11,853 13,640
Occupancy................................................. 3,944 4,110 4,143
Depreciation and amortization............................. 10,097 8,787 8,808
Asset impairment charge................................... -- -- 1,178
-------- -------- --------
Total operating expenses............................... 98,315 94,796 107,571
-------- -------- --------
Operating income (loss)................................... 5,838 2,871 (701)
Income (loss) from joint ventures........................... 606 (160) (1,425)
-------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before financing costs and income taxes..... 6,444 2,711 (2,126)
Interest and other expense on debt.......................... 8,071 6,473 5,623
Receivable securitization expense........................... -- 1,260 3,724
-------- -------- --------
Total financing costs.................................. 8,071 7,733 9,347
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle.............................................. (1,627) (5,022) (11,473)
Income tax benefit.......................................... 626 1,933 3,728
-------- -------- --------
Loss from continuing operations before cumulative effect
of a change in accounting principle.................... (1,001) (3,089) (7,745)
Discontinued operations:
Loss from discontinued tube operation, net of income tax
benefit of $653 in 2002, $350 in 2001, and $470 in
2000................................................... (1,042) (559) (976)
Loss on disposition of discontinued tube operation, net of
income tax benefit of $1,001........................... (1,599) -- --
-------- -------- --------
Loss before cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle................................................. (3,642) (3,648) (8,721)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net
of income tax benefit of $1,298........................ (2,117) -- --
-------- -------- --------
Net loss.................................................... $ (5,759) $ (3,648) $ (8,721)
======== ======== ========
Basic and diluted net loss per share:
Loss from continuing operations........................... $ (0.10) $ (0.32) $ (0.80)
Loss from discontinued operations......................... $ (0.28) (0.06) (0.10)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle..... $ (0.22) -- --
-------- -------- --------
Net loss.................................................... $ (0.60) $ (0.38) $ (0.90)
======== ======== ========
Weighted average shares outstanding......................... 9,637 9,588 9,677
</Table>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
24

OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2002 AND 2001
(in thousands)

<Table>
<Caption>
2002 2001
-------- --------

ASSETS
Cash........................................................ $ 1,736 $ 1,054
Accounts receivable, net.................................... 48,877 38,725
Inventories................................................. 101,837 72,287
Prepaid expenses and other.................................. 9,399 3,514
Assets held for sale........................................ 837 1,660
-------- --------
Total current assets................................... 162,686 117,240
-------- --------
Property and equipment, at cost............................. 151,563 159,544
Accumulated depreciation.................................... (54,240) (48,433)
-------- --------
Net property and equipment............................. 97,323 111,111
-------- --------
Investments in joint ventures............................... 637 31
Deferred financing fees, net................................ 2,265 3,589
Goodwill, net............................................... -- 3,415
-------- --------
Total assets........................................... $262,911 $235,386
======== ========
LIABILITIES
Current portion of long-term debt........................... $ 6,973 $ 4,786
Accounts payable............................................ 28,665 20,143
Accrued payroll............................................. 2,498 3,200
Other accrued liabilities................................... 5,826 4,326
-------- --------
Total current liabilities.............................. 43,962 32,455
-------- --------
Credit facility revolver.................................... 57,560 24,359
Term loans.................................................. 38,056 48,237
Industrial revenue bonds.................................... 4,204 7,117
-------- --------
Total long-term debt................................... 99,820 79,713
-------- --------
Deferred income taxes....................................... 3,634 1,975
-------- --------
Total liabilities...................................... 147,416 114,143
-------- --------
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, without par value, 5,000 shares authorized,
no shares issued or outstanding........................... -- --
Common stock, without par value, 20,000 shares authorized,
9,643 and 9,631 issued and outstanding after deducting
1,049 and 1,061 shares in treasury at December 31, 2002
and 2001, respectively.................................... 99,766 99,733
Officer note receivable..................................... (726) (704)
Retained earnings........................................... 16,455 22,214
-------- --------
Total shareholders' equity............................. 115,495 121,243
-------- --------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity............. $262,911 $235,386
======== ========
</Table>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these balance sheets.
25

OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000
(in thousands)

<Table>
<Caption>
2002 2001 2000
-------- -------- --------

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss.................................................. $ (5,759) $ (3,648) $ (8,721)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from
operating activities-
Depreciation and amortization.......................... 13,852 10,084 9,222
Loss on disposition of discontinued tube operation, net
of tax............................................... 1,599 -- --
(Income) loss from joint ventures...................... (606) 160 1,425
Loss on disposition of property and equipment.......... 185 -- --
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle,
net of tax........................................... 2,117 -- --
Long-term deferred income taxes........................ 3,958 (2,593) (1,964)
Asset impairment charge................................ -- -- 1,178
-------- -------- --------
15,346 4,003 1,140
Changes in working capital:
Accounts receivable....................................... (8,899) (33,494) 4,590
Inventories............................................... (29,550) 17,117 30,181
Prepaid expenses and other................................ (5,885) (1,922) 706
Accounts payable.......................................... 8,522 1,745 (2,273)
Accrued payroll and other accrued liabilities............. 921 (687) (1,303)
-------- -------- --------
(34,891) (17,241) 31,901
-------- -------- --------
Net cash from (used for) operating activities........ (19,545) (13,238) 33,041
-------- -------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures, net................................. (1,490) (2,635) (5,451)
Proceeds from disposition of property and equipment....... 1,615 -- --
Investments in joint ventures............................. -- (1,012) (646)
-------- -------- --------
Net cash from (used for) investing activities........ 125 (3,647) (6,097)
-------- -------- --------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Credit facility revolver borrowings (repayments), net..... 33,201 (4,063) (19,470)
Term loans and industrial revenue bonds................... (10,907) 20,553 (5,947)
New credit facility closing fees and expenses............. (2,225) -- --
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee stock
purchases.............................................. 33 -- --
Unexpended IRB funds...................................... -- -- 1,668
Repurchase of common stock................................ -- -- (3,179)
-------- -------- --------
Net cash from (used for) financing activities........ 20,102 16,490 (26,928)
-------- -------- --------
Cash:
Net change................................................ 682 (395) 16
Beginning balance......................................... 1,054 1,449 1,433
-------- -------- --------
Ending balance............................................ $ 1,736 $ 1,054 $ 1,449
======== ======== ========
</Table>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
26

OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000
(in thousands)

<Table>
<Caption>
COMMON OFFICER NOTE RETAINED
STOCK RECEIVABLE EARNINGS
-------- ------------ --------

Balance at December 31, 1999................................ $102,237 $ -- $34,583
Net loss.................................................. -- -- (8,721)
Repurchase of 760 common shares........................... (3,179) -- --
-------- ----- -------
Balance at December 31, 2000................................ 99,058 -- 25,862
Net loss.................................................. -- -- (3,648)
Issuance of stock to officer.............................. 675 (675) --
Interest on officer note.................................. -- (29) --
-------- ----- -------
Balance at December 31, 2001................................ 99,733 (704) 22,214
NET LOSS.................................................. -- -- (5,759)
INTEREST ON OFFICER NOTE.................................. -- (34) --
PAYMENT OF INTEREST ON OFFICER NOTE....................... -- 12 --
EXERCISE OF STOCK OPTIONS AND EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASES (12
SHARES)................................................ 33 -- --
-------- ----- -------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2002................................ $ 99,766 $(726) $16,455
======== ===== =======
</Table>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
27

OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001, AND 2000
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Olympic Steel, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively the Company
or Olympic), after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions.
Investments in the Company's joint ventures are accounted for under the equity
method. Certain amounts in the 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements
have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation with no
effect on net income or shareholders' equity.

NATURE OF BUSINESS

ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.

CONCENTRATION RISKS

The Company is a major customer of flat-rolled coil and plate steel for
many of its principal suppliers, but is not dependent on any one supplier. The
Company purchased approximately 11% and 16% of its total steel requirements from
its single largest supplier in 2002 and 2001, respectively.

INVENTORIES

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and include the costs
of purchased steel, internal and external processing, and inbound freight. Cost
is determined using the specific identification method.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, AND DEPRECIATION

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using
the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging
from 3 to 30 years (30 years for buildings and 10-15 years for machinery and
equipment). In the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company recorded $1,656 of
accelerated depreciation of previously capitalized software development costs
associated with suspension of its internal business system development project.

INCOME TAXES

GOODWILL

On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142 (SFAS No. 142), "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which
requires that the Company cease amortization of goodwill and conduct periodic
impairment tests of goodwill. The Company estimated the fair value of its
reporting units using a present value method that discounted future cash flows.
The cash flow estimates incorporate assumptions on future cash flow growth,
terminal values and discount rates. Any such valuation is sensitive to these
assumptions. Because the fair value of each reporting unit was below its
carrying value (including goodwill), application of SFAS No. 142 required the
Company to complete the second step of the goodwill impairment test and compare
the implied fair value of each reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying value
of that goodwill. As a result of this assessment, the Company recorded a
non-cash, before tax impairment charge of $3,415 ($2,117 after-tax) to write-off
the entire goodwill amount as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle.

The following table presents a comparison of the 2002 results to 2001 and
2000 results adjusted to exclude goodwill amortization expense:

<Table>
<Caption>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
---------- ---------- ----------
(in thousands, except per share data)

Loss before cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle......................... $(3,642) $(3,648) $(8,721)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle, net of tax........................ (2,117) -- --
------- ------- -------
Reported net loss.............................. (5,759) (3,648) (8,721)
Addback: goodwill amortization, net of tax..... -- 64 70
------- ------- -------
Adjusted net loss.............................. $(5,759) $(3,584) $(8,651)
======= ======= =======
Basic and diluted net loss per share:
Loss before cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle......................... $ (.38) $ (.38) $ (.90)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle, net of tax........................ (.22) -- --
------- ------- -------
Reported net loss.............................. (.60) (.38) (.90)
Addback: goodwill amortization, net of tax..... -- .01 .01
Adjusted net loss.............................. $ (.60) $ (.37) $ (.89)
======= ======= =======
</Table>

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Revenue is recognized in accordance with the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements." For both direct and toll shipments, revenue is recognized
when steel is shipped to the customer and title is transferred. Sales returns
and allowances are treated as reductions to sales and are provided for based on
historical experience and current estimates and are immaterial to the
consolidated financial statements.

SHIPPING AND HANDLING FEES AND COSTS

The Company classifies all amounts billed to a customer in a sales
transaction related to shipping and handling as revenue. Additionally, the
Company classifies costs incurred for shipping and handling to the customer as
"Distribution" expense in its consolidated statements of income.

IMPAIRMENT AND RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

Restructuring charges are recorded in accordance with Emerging Issues Task
Force 94-3 (EITF 94-3), "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination
Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity."

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS No. 123),
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," encourages, but does not require
companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation
plans at fair value. The Company has chosen to continue to account for
stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees," and related Interpretations. Accordingly, compensation cost for
stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of
the Company's stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must
pay to acquire the stock. The Company's stock-based employee compensation plans
are described more fully in Note 11.

If the Company had elected to recognize compensation cost based on the fair
value of the options granted at the grant date under SFAS No. 123, net income
and earnings per share would have been reduced by the amounts shown below:

<Table>
<Caption>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------
2002 2001 2000
------- ------- -------

Net loss, as reported............................ $(5,759) $(3,648) $(8,721)
Pro forma expense, net of tax.................... (134) (262) (200)
------- ------- -------
Pro forma net loss............................... $(5,893) $(3,910) $(8,921)
======= ======= =======
Basic and diluted net loss per share:
As reported.................................... $ (0.60) $ (0.38) $ (0.90)
======= ======= =======
Pro forma...................................... $ (0.61) $ (0.41) $ (0.92)
======= ======= =======
</Table>

SHARES OUTSTANDING AND EARNINGS PER SHARE

In April 1999 and July 2000, the Company's Board of Directors authorized
programs, which expired in July 2001, to purchase up to an aggregate of 2
million shares of Olympic Common Stock. During 1999 and 2000, the Company
repurchased 1,360,900 shares at an average price of $5.31 per share. Repurchased
shares are held in treasury and are available for general corporate purposes.

Earnings per share for all periods presented have been calculated and
presented in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
128, "Earnings Per Share." Basic earnings per share excludes any dilutive
effects of stock options and is calculated by dividing income available to
common shareholders by

the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted
earnings per share is calculated including the dilutive effects of stock
options. Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding were 9.6 million
in 2002 and 2001, and 9.7 million in 2000. Stock options to purchase 982,833
shares for 2002, 885,833 for 2001, and 441,833 for 2000, were not dilutive and
therefore were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share
amounts.

IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (SFAS No. 141), "Business
Combinations" and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." SFAS No.
141 provides that all business combinations should be accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting and establishes criteria for the initial
recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets recorded in
connection with a business combination. The provisions of SFAS No. 141 apply to
all business combinations initiated or completed after June 30, 2001. The
Company will apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141 to any future business
combination. SFAS No. 142 addresses financial accounting and reporting for
acquired goodwill and other intangible assets. SFAS No. 142 requires that
goodwill no longer be amortized, but instead requires a transitional goodwill
impairment assessment and annual impairment tests thereafter. The Company
adopted SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002. See "Goodwill" disclosure elsewhere in
this Note for the impact of adoption of SFAS No. 142 on the Company's financial
statements.

In June 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 143 (SFAS No. 143), "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." SFAS No.
143 requires recognition of the fair value of the liability associated with the
legal obligation to retire long-lived assets in the period in which the
obligation is incurred. At that time, an asset retirement cost of an equal
amount is to be capitalized and subsequently allocated to expense using a
systematic and rational approach over the estimated useful life of the related
asset. SFAS No. 143 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2003. The
Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 143 to have a material effect
on the Company's financial statements.

statements, and the Company will continue to utilize the intrinsic value method
to account for stock-based compensation.

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45),
"Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others." The interpretation requires that upon
issuance of a guarantee, the entity must recognize a liability for the fair
value of the obligation it assumes under that obligation. The Company adopted
the disclosure provisions of FIN 45 effective for the year ended December 31,
2002. The provisions for initial recognition and measurement of guarantees are
effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2003. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of FIN 45 on its financial statements. In January 2003,
the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), "Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities." FIN 46 addresses consolidation by business enterprises of
variable interest entities which possess certain characteristics. The
interpretation requires that if a business enterprise has a controlling
financial interest in a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities and
results of operations of the variable interest entity must be included in the
consolidated financial statements with those of the business enterprise. This
interpretation applies immediately to variable interest enterprises created
after January 31, 2003 and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise
obtains an interest after that date. For variable interest entities created
prior to January 31, 2003, this interpretation is effective for the first year
or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company is evaluating the
classification of certain investments under FIN 46 on its financial statements.

2. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:

In June 2002, the Company decided to close its unprofitable tube processing
operation (Tubing) in Cleveland, Ohio. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Tubing
has been accounted for as a discontinued operation. As a result, Tubing's
after-tax operating losses of $1,042 for the first six months of 2002, and $559
and $976 for fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, are
shown separate from the Company's results from continuing operations. In
addition, a $1,599 after-tax charge for the costs of the Tubing closure is
included in the 2002 consolidated statement of income. This non-cash charge
primarily relates to the write down of Tubing's property and equipment to
estimated fair value less costs to sell in accordance with SFAS No. 144. The
fair value of the Tubing property and equipment was determined by independent
appraisal. In December 2002, the Company sold the Tubing equipment for $1,275
(its approximate appraised value) and used the proceeds from the sale to reduce
debt. The Tubing real estate is recorded as "Assets Held for Sale" on the
accompanying December 31, 2002 consolidated balance sheet for $837. The Company
anticipates selling the Tubing real estate during 2003 and will use the proceeds
to reduce debt.

Included in Tubing's 2002 operating loss is a before tax $700 charge ($431
after-tax) for liabilities primarily related to post-closure employee and
tenancy costs. Tubing had approximately 30 salaried and hourly employees. The
charge was recorded in accordance with EITF 94-3, "Liability Recognition for
Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity."
Through December 31, 2002, the Company has paid or incurred $386 of the $700
provision. The accompanying December 31, 2002 balance sheet includes $314 in
"Other Accrued Liabilities" for future Tubing liabilities, which the Company
expects to be paid in 2003. Substantially all of Tubing's working capital was
liquidated prior to December 31, 2002.

Operating results of discontinued operations were as follows:

<Table>
<Caption>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
----------- ----------- -----------
(in thousands, except per share data)

Net sales........................................ $ 3,766 $11,491 $14,837
Loss before income taxes......................... (1,695) (909) (1,446)
Loss from operations of discontinued tube
operation, net of income tax benefit of $653 in
2002, $350 in 2001, and $470 in 2000........... (1,042) (559) (976)
Loss on disposition of discontinued tube
operation, net of income tax benefit of
$1,001......................................... (1,599) -- --
------- ------- -------
Loss from discontinued operations................ $(2,641) $ (559) $ (976)
======= ======= =======
Basic and diluted net loss per share from
discontinued operations........................ $ (.28) $ (.06) $ (.10)
======= ======= =======
</Table>

3. ASSET IMPAIRMENT CHARGE:

During the fourth quarter of 2000, the Company decided to dispose of
certain underutilized equipment and to consolidate its Chicago operations in its
existing Schaumburg, Illinois facility and to close its Elk Grove Village,
Illinois facility. The Company recorded an asset impairment charge in the fourth
quarter of 2000 totaling $1,178 to reduce the net book value of the
underutilized equipment to its estimated fair value less costs to sell in
accordance with SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of." SFAS No. 121 requires
assets such as goodwill and fixed assets to be written down to fair market value
when circumstances indicate that their carrying values are impaired. The fair
value of the equipment was determined by independent appraisals. In 2001, a
portion of the underutilized equipment was sold for $125. The underutilized
equipment and facility are shown as "Assets Held for Sale" on the accompanying
December 31, 2001 consolidated balance sheet in the amount of $1,660. In 2002,
the Company sold the Elk Grove Village facility and the underutilized equipment
for $1,614 and used the proceeds to reduce debt.

4. INVESTMENTS IN JOINT VENTURES:

The Company and the United States Steel Corporation (USS) each own 50% of
Olympic Laser Processing (OLP), a company that processes laser welded sheet
steel blanks for the automotive industry. OLP's Michigan facility is equipped
with two automated and two manual-feed laser-welding lines. A fifth automated
line has been purchased and is expected to be installed in the second half of
2003. The Company and USS have each contributed $3,300 in cash to capitalize
OLP, and each guarantees, on a several basis, 50% of OLP's outstanding debt
under its $20,000 bank loan agreement which expires on May 1, 2004. OLP bank
debt outstanding at December 31, 2002 totaled $17,326.

The Company has a 49% ownership interest in G.S.P., LLC (GSP), a joint
venture to support the flat-rolled steel requirements of the automotive industry
as a Minority Business Enterprise. The Company has contributed $603 in cash to
capitalize GSP. On April 1, 2002, Thomas A. Goss and Gregory F. Goss, executive
officers of the Goss Group, Inc., an insurance enterprise, assumed 51% majority
ownership interest from the venture's previous majority owners. GSP is a
certified member of the Michigan Minority Business Development Council. The
Company guarantees 49% of the outstanding debt under GSP's $3,880 demand note
bank loan agreement. GSP bank debt outstanding at December 31, 2002 totaled
$1,527.

The following table sets forth selected data for the Company's OLP and GSP
joint ventures:

<Table>
<Caption>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------
INCOME STATEMENT DATA: 2002 2001 2000
---------------------- --------- --------- ---------

Net sales....................................... $31,067 $21,061 $12,906
Gross margin.................................... 11,392 7,578 4,990
Operating income (loss)......................... 2,022 708 (1,326)
Net income (loss)............................... $ 1,208 $ (319) $(1,425)
</Table>

<Table>
<Caption>
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
-------------------
BALANCE SHEET DATA: 2002 2001
------------------- -------- --------

Current assets............................................ $ 5,916 $ 4,777
Net property and equipment................................ 18,310 19,472
Current liabilities....................................... 7,538 6,509
Long-term liabilities..................................... $16,337 $18,598
</Table>

The Company's investments in joint ventures totaled $637 and $31 at
December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

5. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE:

From 1995 to June 2001, the Company operated under an agreement to sell, on
a revolving basis, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Olympic Steel Receivables
LLC, an undivided interest in a designated pool of its trade accounts
receivable. In connection with its June 2001 loan refinancing, the Company's
accounts receivable securitization program was terminated, resulting in the
repurchase of $42,000 of accounts receivable previously sold. In conjunction
with the termination of the receivable securitization program, the Company no
longer incurred receivable securitization expense on its consolidated statements
of income.

The average receivable pool sold totaled $43,253 while the program was in
effect in 2001 compared to $52,066 in 2000. Costs of the program, which
primarily consisted of the purchaser's financing cost of issuing commercial
paper backed by the receivables, totaled $1,260 and $3,724 in 2001 and 2000,
respectively, and have been classified as "Receivable Securitization Expense" in
the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The program costs were based
on commercial paper rates plus 65 basis points. The average program costs for
2001 and 2000 were 5.9% and 7.0%, respectively.

Accounts receivable are presented net of allowances for doubtful accounts
of $940 and $921 as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Bad debt
expense totaled $1,074 in 2002, $979 in 2001, and $2,355 in 2000.

6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:

Property and equipment consists of the following:

<Table>
<Caption>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------
2002 2001
-------- --------

Land and improvements................................... $ 9,800 $ 9,914
Buildings and improvements.............................. 54,594 56,583
Machinery and equipment................................. 75,432 80,546
Furniture and fixtures.................................. 4,782 4,802
Computer equipment...................................... 5,727 5,697
Vehicles................................................ 145 177
Construction in progress................................ 1,083 1,825
-------- --------
151,563 159,544
Less accumulated depreciation........................... (54,240) (48,433)
Net property and equipment............................ $ 97,323 $111,111
======== ========
</Table>

Construction in progress at December 31, 2002 primarily consisted of
expenditures related to the Company's ongoing business process improvement
project.

7. DEBT:

REFINANCED CREDIT FACILITY

On December 30, 2002, the Company refinanced its 3-year, $125,000 secured
financing agreement (the Refinanced Credit Facility) with a new 3-year, $132,000
secured bank-financing agreement (the New Credit Facility). The New Credit
Facility is expected to significantly reduce the Company's financing costs.
Funding under the New Credit Facility occurred on January 2, 2003, and proceeds
were used to pay off outstanding borrowings under the Refinanced Credit
Facility, certain industrial revenue bonds and term debt. The Refinanced Credit
Facility was collateralized by the Company's accounts receivable, inventories,
and substantially all property and equipment. Borrowings under the Refinanced
Credit Facility were limited to the lesser of a borrowing base, comprised of
eligible receivables, inventories and property and equipment, or $125,000 in the
aggregate. Borrowing rates under the Refinanced Credit Facility were based on
the agent bank's base rate or London Interbank Offered Rates (LIBOR) plus a
premium (the Premium).

In connection with the refinancing, the prior agent bank waived $861 of
deferred pay term loan interest, which the Company previously expensed. Fourth
quarter 2002 earnings results reflect the waived amount as a reduction to
interest expense, offset by $2,082 of accelerated non-cash deferred financing
fee amortization related to the early termination of the Refinanced Credit
Facility. Deferred financing fees were being amortized to expense over the term
of the Refinanced Credit Facility, and amortization of these costs amounted to
$1,388 in 2002 and $687 in 2001.

The Refinanced Credit Facility required the Company to comply with various
covenants, the most significant of which included: (i) minimum excess
availability of $10,000, (ii) a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, (iii)
restrictions on additional indebtedness, and (iv) limitations on capital
expenditures. The Company was in compliance with all of its loan covenants
during 2002.

NEW CREDIT FACILITY REVOLVER AND TERM LOANS

The New Credit Facility is collateralized by the Company's accounts
receivable, inventories, and substantially all property and equipment. The New
Credit Facility expires on December 15, 2005, with two additional annual
extensions at the banks' option. Revolver borrowings are limited to the lesser
of a borrowing base, comprised of eligible receivables and inventories, or
$90,000 in the aggregate. The Company has the option to borrow based on the
agent bank's base rate or Eurodollar Rates (EURO) plus a Premium. Components and
interest rate options for the New Credit Facility were as follows commencing
January 2, 2003:

<Table>
<Caption>
COMPONENT AMORTIZATION PREMIUM OVER BASE
- --------- -------------------------- -----------------------------

$90,000 Revolver... Not applicable 0.25% on Prime Borrowings
2.25% on EURO Borrowings
$12,000 Equipment
Term Loan.......... $200 per month, commencing 0.75% on Prime Borrowings
February 2003 2.75% on EURO Borrowings
$30,000 Real Estate
Term Loan.......... $167 per month, commencing 0.75% on Prime Borrowings
February 2003 2.75% on EURO Borrowings
</Table>

A commitment fee of .375% is paid monthly on any unused portion of the New
Credit Facility. Each quarter, the commitment fee and Premiums may increase or
decrease based on the Company's debt service coverage performance. Interest on
all borrowing options is paid monthly. The opening revolver interest rate
approximated 3.8% on January 2, 2003.

The New Credit Facility requires the Company to comply with various
covenants, the most significant of which include: (i) minimum excess
availability of $10,000, tested monthly, (ii) a minimum fixed charge coverage

ratio of 1.25, and maximum leverage ratio of 1.75, which are tested quarterly
commencing March 2003, (iii) restrictions on additional indebtedness, and (iv)
limitations on capital expenditures. Opening excess availability under the New
Credit Facility totaled $21,559 on January 2, 2003.

The Company incurred $2,225 of New Credit Facility closing fees and
expenses, which have been capitalized and included in "Deferred Financing Fees,
Net" on the accompanying December 31, 2002 consolidated balance sheet. These
costs are amortized to interest and other expense on debt over the 3-year term
of the agreement.

The credit facility revolver balance on the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets includes $2,065 and $5,187 of checks issued that have not cleared
the bank as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

TERM LOANS

The Company's Southeastern Term Loan was secured by real estate and
equipment located at its Georgia facility. Interest was charged at LIBOR plus
the same Premium associated with the Company's Refinanced Credit Facility
revolver. The Southeastern Term Loan was repaid in full as part of the December
30, 2002 refinancing.

The long-term portion of term loans at December 31, 2002 and 2001,
consisted of the following:

<Table>
<Caption>
OPENING RATE RATE AT
DESCRIPTION AT 1/2/03 12/31/02 2002 2001
- ----------- ------------ ----------- ------- -------

New Equipment Term Loan........... 4.1% -- $ 9,800 $ --
Refinanced Term Loan A............ -- 5.4% -- 23,500
New Real Estate Term Loan......... 4.1% -- 28,167 --
Refinanced Term Loan B............ -- 15.0% -- 20,953
Southeastern Term Loan............ -- 6.5% -- 3,668
Other............................. 4.0% 4.0% 89 116
---- ---- ------- -------
$38,056 $48,237
==== ==== ======= =======
</Table>

INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS

The long-term portion of industrial revenue bonds (IRB's) at December 31,
2002 and 2001, consisted of the following:

<Table>
<Caption>
INTEREST
DESCRIPTION OF BONDS RATE AT 12/31/02 2002 2001
- -------------------- ---------------- ------ ------

$6,000 fixed rate bonds due 1999 through
2014....................................... 5.1% $4,204 $4,527
$6,000 variable rate bonds due 1995 through
2004....................................... -- -- 1,200
$4,800 variable rate bonds due 1992 through
2004....................................... -- -- 950
$2,660 variable rate bonds due 1992 through
2004....................................... -- -- 440
------ ------
$4,204 $7,117
====== ======
</Table>

The Company had letter of credit commitments totaling $3,871 at December
31, 2001 supporting the IRB's due in 2004, which were paid off in the first
quarter of 2003 with proceeds from the New Credit Facility. The accompanying
December 31, 2002 consolidated balance sheet includes $2,590 of IRB principal as
current portion of long-term debt. A corresponding escrow deposit of $2,651 was
included in prepaid expenses to fund the IRB principal and interest payment.

8. SCHEDULED DEBT MATURITIES, INTEREST, DEBT CARRYING VALUES:

Scheduled maturities of all long-term debt for the years succeeding
December 31, 2002 are $6,973 in 2003, $4,877 in 2004, $34,058 in 2005, $513 in
2006, $539 in 2007, and $2,273 thereafter. The overall effective interest rate
for all debt amounted to 5.7% in 2002, 8.8% in 2001, and 8.3% in 2000. Interest
paid totaled $6,067, $5,116, and $6,293, for the years ended December 31, 2002,
2001, and 2000, respectively. Amounts paid relative to the

accounts receivable securitization program, which was terminated in June 2001,
totaled $1,587 in 2001, and $3,805 in 2000.

Management believes the carrying values of its long-term debt approximate
their fair values, as each of the Company's variable rate debt arrangements bear
interest at rates that fluctuate based on a bank's base rate, EURO, LIBOR, or
the short-term tax exempt revenue bond index.

The Company has not entered into interest rate transactions for speculative
purposes or otherwise. The Company does not hedge its exposure to floating
interest rate risk. However, the Company has the option to enter into 30 to 180
day fixed base rate EURO loans under the New Credit Facility.

9. INCOME TAXES:

The components of the Company's benefit for income taxes from continuing
operations were as follows:

<Table>
<Caption>
2002 2001 2000
---- ------ ------

Current:
Federal............................................ $ -- $ 10 $1,543
State and local.................................... -- 105 163
---- ------ ------
-- 115 1,706
Deferred............................................. 626 1,818 2,022
---- ------ ------
$626 $1,933 $3,728
==== ====== ======
</Table>

The components of the Company's net current and deferred tax asset or
liability at December 31 are as follows:

<Table>
<Caption>
ASSET/(LIABILITY) 2002 2001
----------------- -------- --------

Refundable income taxes................................. $ 86 $ 115
Current deferred income taxes:
Inventory............................................. 242 156
Tax credit and net operating loss carryforward........ 1,850 1,850
Other temporary items................................. 1,791 492
-------- --------
Total current deferred income taxes..................... 3,883 2,498
======== ========
Refundable and current deferred income taxes............ 3,969 2,613
-------- --------
Long-term deferred income taxes:
Goodwill.............................................. 1,345 482
Tax credit and net operating loss carryforward, net of
valuation reserve.................................. 6,490 9,462
Tax in excess of book depreciation.................... (10,351) (10,728)
Other temporary items................................. (1,118) (1,191)
-------- --------
Total long-term deferred income taxes.............. (3,634) (1,975)
-------- --------
Total income tax asset............................. $ 335 $ 638
======== ========
</Table>

The following table reconciles the U.S. federal statutory rate to the
Company's effective tax rate:

<Table>
<Caption>
2002 2001 2000
---- ---- ----

U.S. federal statutory rate.............................. 35.0% 35.0% 34.0%
State and local taxes, net of federal benefit............ 2.6 2.0 2.0
Valuation reserve........................................ -- -- (4.5)
All other, net........................................... 0.9 1.5 1.0
---- ---- ----
Effective income tax rate................................ 38.5% 38.5% 32.5%
==== ==== ====
</Table>

The tax provision includes a current provision (benefit) of $0, ($115), and
($1,706), and a deferred expense (benefit) of ($3,578), ($2,168), and ($2,492)
in 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. In 2000, the valuation reserve totaled
$568. Net refunds of income taxes totaled $3,559 and $1,573 in 2002 and 2001,
respectively. The Company has net operating loss carryforwards of $15,479, which
begin expiring in the year ended December 31, 2020. If the Company were to
continue to incur losses before taxes in the future, it would be necessary to
reassess the need for a valuation allowance.

On March 9, 2002 the "Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act" (H.R. 3090)
was signed into law. A significant portion of this law is a temporary extension
of the net operating loss carryback period from two to five years for net
operating losses arising in taxable years ending in 2001 and 2002. As a result
of this change in tax law, the Company received a $3.7 million tax refund in
July 2002 after filing its federal income tax return for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2001 and the related carryback claim. The Company expects to
receive an additional $1,100 tax refund in 2003 related to H.R. 3090.

10. RETIREMENT PLANS:

The Company's retirement plans consist of a profit-sharing plan and a
401(k) plan covering all non-union employees and two separate 401(k) plans
covering all union employees.

Company contributions to the non-union profit-sharing plan are
discretionary amounts as determined annually by the Board of Directors. No
profit sharing contributions were made in 2002 and 2001. In 2000, Company
profit-sharing contributions were 2% of each eligible employee's W-2 earnings.
The non-union 401(k) retirement plan allows eligible employees to contribute up
to 10% of their W-2 earnings. The Company contribution is determined annually by
the Board of Directors and is based on a percentage of eligible employees'
contributions. For each of the last three years, the Company matched one half of
each eligible employee's contribution.

Company contributions for each of the last three years for the union plans
were 3% of eligible W-2 wages plus one half of the first 4% of each employee's
contribution.

Retirement plan expense amounted to $1,132, $1,066, and $1,759 for the
years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively.

11. STOCK OPTIONS:

In January 1994, the Stock Option Plan (Option Plan) was adopted by the
Board of Directors and approved by the shareholders of the Company. Pursuant to
the provisions of the Option Plan, key employees of the Company, non-employee
directors and consultants may be offered the opportunity to acquire shares of
Common Stock by the grant of stock options, including both incentive stock
options (ISOs) and nonqualified stock options. ISOs are not available to
non-employee directors or consultants. A total of 1,300,000 shares of Common
Stock are reserved under the Option Plan. The purchase price of a share of
Common Stock pursuant to an ISO will not be less than the fair market value of a
share of Common Stock at the grant date. Options vest over three or five years
at rates of 33.3% and 20% per year, respectively, commencing on the first
anniversary of the grant date, and all expire 10 years after the grant date. The
Option Plan terminates on January 5, 2009. Termination of the Option Plan will
not affect outstanding options.

Transactions under the Option Plan are as follows:

<Table>
<Caption>
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
SHARES EXERCISE PRICE
------- ----------------

Outstanding at January 1, 2000...................... 306,833 $11.15
Granted (at exercise price of $4.84).............. 171,500 4.84
Forfeited......................................... (36,500) 10.60
------- ------
Outstanding at December 31, 2000.................... 441,833 8.75
Granted (at exercise prices ranging from
$1.97 -- $2.63)................................ 502,000 2.21
Forfeited......................................... (58,000) 7.99
------- ------
Outstanding at December 31, 2001.................... 885,833 5.09
Granted (at exercise price of $5.28).............. 147,000 5.28
Exercised......................................... (10,500) 2.91
Forfeited......................................... (39,500) 6.21
------- ------
Outstanding at December 31, 2002.................... 982,833 $ 5.10
======= ======
</Table>

The weighted average fair value of options granted during 2002, 2001 and
2000 was $5.28, $2.21, and $4.84, respectively.

The following table summarizes information about fixed-price stock options
outstanding at December 31, 2002:

<Table>
<Caption>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
EXERCISE NUMBER OF REMAINING AVERAGE EXERCISE NUMBER OF AVERAGE EXERCISE
PRICE SHARES CONTRACTUAL LIFE PRICE SHARES PRICE
- -------- --------- ---------------- ---------------- --------- ----------------

$15.50 62,000 1.2 years $15.50 62,000 $15.50
15.50 10,000 2.2 years 15.50 10,000 15.50
15.50 10,000 3.3 years 15.50 10,000 15.50
14.63 8,000 4.3 years 14.63 8,000 14.63
8.75 133,833 6.3 years 8.75 133,833 8.75
4.84 134,667 7.3 years 4.84 89,334 4.84
1.97 300,000 8.0 years 1.97 60,000 1.97
2.38 50,000 8.1 years 2.38 10,000 2.38
2.63 133,833 8.3 years 2.63 39,500 2.63
5.28 140,500 9.3 years 5.28 -- 5.28
</Table>

In 1996, the Company adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No.
123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," as the Company utilizes the
intrinsic value method to account for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS
No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation--Transition and Disclosure--an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 123" has amended SFAS No. 123, and the required
disclosures are included herein.

The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions:

<Table>
<Caption>
2002 2001 2000
---- ---- ----

Risk free interest rate.................................. 5.13% 5.25% 6.28%
Expected life in years................................... 10 10 10
Expected volatility...................................... .57 .54 .52
Expected dividend yield.................................. 0% 0% 0%
</Table>

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

The Company leases certain warehouses, sales offices and machinery and
equipment under long-term lease agreements. All leases are classified as
operating and expire at various dates through 2010. In some cases the

leases include options to extend. Rent expense was $1,512, $1,351, and $1,448
for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively.

Future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2002 are as follows:

<Table>

2003........................................................ $1,389
2004........................................................ 1,297
2005........................................................ 695
2006........................................................ 648
2007........................................................ 545
Thereafter.................................................. 977
------
$5,551
======
</Table>

In the normal course of business, the Company periodically enters into
agreements that incorporate indemnification provisions. While the maximum amount
to which the Company may be exposed under such agreements can not be estimated,
it is the opinion of management that these guarantees and indemnifications are
not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of
operations or financial position.

Approximately 230 of the Company's hourly plant personnel at the
Minneapolis and Detroit facilities are represented by four separate collective
bargaining units. The collective bargaining agreement covering the Company's
Minneapolis plate processing facility expires on March 31, 2003, and the
agreement covering Detroit's hourly plant employees expires June 30, 2004.

13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:

A related entity handles a portion of the freight activity for the
Company's Cleveland operation. Payments to this entity totaled $1,458, $1,327,
and $1,406 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively.
There is no common ownership or management of this entity with the Company.
Another related entity owns one of the Cleveland warehouses and leases it to the
Company at an annual rental of $195. The lease was renewed in June 2000 for a
10-year term with one remaining renewal option for an additional 10 years.

David A. Wolfort, President and Chief Operating Officer, purchased 300,000
shares of the Company's Common Stock from treasury on February 22, 2001. The
shares were purchased pursuant to a 5-year, full recourse promissory note
payable to the Company due and payable on or before January 1, 2006. The
principal balance of $675 accrues interest at 5.07% per annum, and is
collateralized by a pledge of the underlying shares until the note is paid in
full.

Michael D. Siegal, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer, and David A. Wolfort, President and Chief Operating Officer, are
minority investors in a company that provides online services to Olympic's
employees with respect to their retirement plan accounts.

14. SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN:

On January 31, 2000, the Company's Board of Directors (the Directors)
approved the adoption of a share purchase rights plan. The terms and description
of the plan are set forth in a rights agreement, dated January 31, 2000, between
the Company and National City Bank, as rights agent (the Rights Agreement). The
Directors declared a dividend distribution of one right for each share of Common
Stock of the Company outstanding as of the March 6, 2000 record date (the Record
Date). The Rights Agreement also provides, subject to specified exceptions and
limitations, that Common Stock issued or delivered from the Company's treasury
after the Record Date will be accompanied by a right. Each right entitles the
holder to purchase one-one-hundredth of a share of Series A Junior Participating
Preferred stock, without par value at a price of $20 per one one-hundredth of a
preferred share (a Right). The Rights expire on March 6, 2010, unless earlier
redeemed, exchanged or amended. Rights become exercisable to purchase Preferred
Shares following the commencement of certain tender offer or exchange offer
solicitations resulting in beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the Company's
outstanding common shares as defined in the Rights Agreement.

SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
2002 UNAUDITED QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

As discussed in Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,
during 2002, the Company decided to close its tube processing operation
(Tubing). In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," the
Company has reclassified its consolidated statements of income to reflect Tubing
as a discontinued operation.

<Table>
<Caption>
2002 AS RESTATED 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH YEAR
- ---------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------

Net sales.......................... $110,239 $121,713 $116,465 $110,967 $459,384
Gross margin....................... 26,655 29,990 26,109 21,399 104,153
Operating income (loss)............ 2,270 4,217 1,598 (2,247) 5,838
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes
and cumulative effect of a change
in accounting principle.......... 735 2,884 244 (5,490) (1,627)
Cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle, net of
income tax benefit of $1,298..... (2,117) -- -- -- (2,117)
Net income (loss).................. $ (1,915) $ (618) $ 150 $ (3,376) $ (5,759)
Basic and diluted net income
(loss) per share.............. $ (0.20) $ (0.06) $ 0.02 $ (0.35) $ (0.60)
Weighted average shares
outstanding................... 9,631 9,635 9,638 9,642 9,637
Market price of common stock: (a)
High............................. $ 6.05 $ 6.15 $ 6.57 $ 3.99 $ 6.57
Low.............................. 2.40 5.05 2.82 2.72 2.40
</Table>

<Table>
<Caption>
2002 AS PREVIOUSLY REPORTED 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH YEAR
- --------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------

Net sales............................... $112,017 $123,701 $116,465 $110,967 $463,150
Gross margin............................ 26,991 30,279 26,109 21,399 104,778
Operating income (loss)................. 1,628 93 1,244 (2,247) 718
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes and cumulative
effect of a change in accounting
principle............................. 329 (1,005) 244 (5,490) (5,922)
Cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle, net of income
tax benefit of $1,298................. (2,117) -- -- -- (2,117)
Net income (loss)....................... $ (1,915) $ (618) $ 150 $ (3,376) $ (5,759)
Basic and diluted net income (loss)
per share.......................... $ (0.20) $ (0.06) $ 0.02 $ (0.35) $ (0.60)
Weighted average shares outstanding... 9,631 9,635 9,638 9,642 9,637
</Table>

- ---------------

(a) Represents high and low closing quotations as reported by the Nasdaq
National Market.

SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
2001 UNAUDITED QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

<Table>
<Caption>
2001 AS RESTATED 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH YEAR
- ---------------- -------- -------- ------- ------- --------

Net sales............................ $113,546 $105,711 $93,995 $91,551 $404,803
Gross margin......................... 25,840 26,081 23,833 21,913 97,667
Operating income (loss).............. 660 1,953 1,036 (778) 2,871
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes and
cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle............... (1,310) 616 (1,576) (2,752) (5,022)
Net income (loss).................... $ (1,011) $ 224 $ (998) $(1,863) $ (3,648)
Basic and diluted net income (loss)
per share....................... $ (0.11) $ 0.02 $ (0.10) $ (0.19) $ (0.38)
Weighted average shares
outstanding..................... 9,460 9,631 9,631 9,631 9,588
Market price of common stock: (a)
High............................... $ 3.06 $ 4.24 $ 4.05 $ 3.95 $ 4.24
Low................................ 1.94 2.16 2.95 2.15 1.94
</Table>

<Table>
<Caption>
2001 AS PREVIOUSLY REPORTED 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH YEAR
- --------------------------- -------- -------- ------- ------- --------

Net sales............................ $117,120 $108,707 $96,770 $93,697 $416,294
Gross margin......................... 26,444 26,700 24,526 22,391 100,061
Operating income (loss).............. 473 1,845 582 (1,267) 1,633
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes and
cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle............... (1,644) 365 (1,624) (3,028) (5,931)
Net income (loss).................... $ (1,011) $ 224 $ (998) $(1,863) $ (3,648)
Basic and diluted net income (loss)
per share....................... $ (0.11) $ 0.02 $ (0.10) $ (0.19) $ (0.38)
Weighted average shares
outstanding..................... 9,460 9,631 9,631 9,631 9,588
</Table>

- ---------------

(a) Represents high and low closing quotations as reported by the Nasdaq
National Market.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Information required by Item 10 as to the Directors of the Registrant will
be incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the
captions "Election of Directors" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance" in the Registrant's definitive proxy statement for its May
8, 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information required by Item 11 will be incorporated herein by reference to
the information set forth under the caption "Executive Officers' Compensation"
in the Registrant's definitive proxy statement for its May 8, 2003 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Information required by Item 12 will be incorporated herein by reference to
the information set forth under the captions "Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners" and "Security Ownership of Management" in the Registrant's
definitive proxy statement for its May 8, 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

SUMMARY OF EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The following table sets forth information about the Company's equity
compensation plans in effect as of December 31, 2002, which consisted solely of
the Olympic Steel, Inc. Stock Option Plan, which was approved by the Company's
shareholders in 1994:

<Table>
<Caption>
NUMBER OF SECURITIES
NUMBER OF SECURITIES REMAINING AVAILABLE
TO BE ISSUED UPON WEIGHTED AVERAGE FOR FUTURE ISSUANCE
EXERCISE OF EXERCISE PRICE OF UNDER EQUITY
PLAN CATEGORY OUTSTANDING OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS COMPENSATION PLAN
- ------------- -------------------- ------------------- --------------------

Equity compensation plans
approved by shareholders....... 982,833 $5.10 317,167
Equity compensation plans not
approved by shareholders....... -- -- --
------- ----- -------
Total............................ 982,833 $5.10 317,167
======= ===== =======
</Table>

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Information required by Item 13 will be incorporated herein by reference to
the information set forth under the caption "Related Party Transactions" in the
Registrant's definitive proxy statement for its May 8, 2003 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.

ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) The Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded, based on an evaluation within 90 days of the filing date of this
report, that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective for
gathering, analyzing and disclosing any material information required to be
disclosed in the Company's filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(b) There have been no significant changes in internal controls, or in
other factors that could affect the Company's internal controls, subsequent to
the date of evaluation.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(A)(1) THE FOLLOWING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN PART II, ITEM 8:

Report of Independent Public Accountants

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2002,
2001, and 2000

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2002,
2001, and 2000

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended December
31, 2002, 2001, and 2000

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(A)(2) FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES. All schedules have been omitted since
the required information is not present or not present in amounts sufficient
to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required
is included in the financial statements including notes thereto.

(A)(3) EXHIBITS. The Exhibits filed herewith are set forth on the Index to
Exhibits filed as part of this report.

(B) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. No reports were filed on Form 8-K during the fourth
quarter of the year ended December 31, 2002.

OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

<Table>
<Caption>
SEQUENTIAL
EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT PAGE NO.
------- ----------------------- ----------

3.1(i) Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (a)
3.1(ii) Amended and Restated Code of Regulations (a)
4.1 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated December 30, 62-242
2002 by and among the Registrant, three banks and Comerica
Bank, as Administrative Agent
4.2 Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement 243-248
dated February 6, 2003 by and among the Registrant, five
banks and Comerica, as Administrative Agent
Information concerning certain of the Registrant's other
long-term debt is set forth in Note 7 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. The Registrant hereby
agrees to furnish copies of such instruments to the
Commission upon request.
4.3 Rights Agreement (Including Form of Certificate of Adoption (b)
of Amendment to Amended Articles of Incorporation as Exhibit
A thereto, together with a Summary of Rights to Purchase
Preferred Stock)
10.1 Olympic Steel, Inc. Stock Option Plan (a)
10.2 Lease, dated as of July 1, 1980, as amended, between S.M.S. (a)
Realty Co., a lessor, and the Registrant, as lessee,
relating to one of the Cleveland facilities
10.4 Lease, dated as of November 30, 1987, as amended, between (a)
Tinicum Properties Associates L.P., as lessor, and the
Registrant, as lessee, relating to Registrant's Lester,
Pennsylvania facility
10.5 Operating Agreement of Trumark Steel & Processing, LLC, (c)
dated April 1, 2002, by and among The Goss Group, Inc., and
Oly Steel Welding, Inc.
10.6 Carrier Contract Agreement for Transportation Services, (d)
dated August 1, 1998, between Lincoln Trucking Company and
the Registrant
10.7 Operating Agreement of OLP, LLC, dated April 4, 1997, by and (e)
between the U.S. Steel Group of USX Corporation and Oly
Steel Welding, Inc.
10.8 Form of Management Retention Agreement for Senior Executive (f)
Officers of the Company
10.9 Form of Management Retention Agreement for Other Officers of (f)
the Company
10.10 David A. Wolfort Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2001 (g)
10.11 Promissory Note and Stock Pledge Agreement between Olympic (g)
Steel, Inc., and David A. Wolfort
21 List of Subsidiaries 49
23 Consent of Independent Public Accountants 50
24 Directors and Officers Powers of Attorney 51
99.1 Financial statements of OLP, LLC 52-59
99.2 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 60
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
99.3 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 61
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
</Table>

- ---------------

(a) Incorporated by reference to the Exhibit with the same exhibit number
included in Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-73992)
filed with the Commission on January 12, 1994.

(b) Incorporated by reference to an Exhibit included in Registrant's Form 10-Q
filed with the Commission on August 13, 2001.
46

(c) Incorporated by reference to an Exhibit included in Registrant's Form 10-Q
filed with the Commission on May 13, 2002.

(d) Incorporated by reference to an Exhibit included in Registrant's Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 12, 1999.

(e) Incorporated by reference to an Exhibit included in Registrant's Form 10-Q
filed with the Commission on May 2, 1997.

(f) Incorporated by reference to an Exhibit included in Registrant's Form 10-Q
filed with the Commission on August 3, 2000.

(g) Incorporated by reference to an Exhibit included in Registrant's Form 10-K
filed with the Commission on March 28, 2001.

SIGNATURES

PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON
ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.

OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.

March 28, 2003 By: /s/ RICHARD T. MARABITO
------------------------------------
Richard T. Marabito,
Chief Financial Officer

PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THIS
REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED BELOW BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS IN THE CAPACITIES
INDICATED AND ON THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2003.

<Table>

/s/ MICHAEL D. SIEGAL * March 28, 2003
- -----------------------------------------------------
Michael D. Siegal
Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ DAVID A. WOLFORT * March 28, 2003
- -----------------------------------------------------
David A. Wolfort
President, Chief Operating Officer
and Director

/s/ RICHARD T. MARABITO * March 28, 2003
- -----------------------------------------------------
Richard T. Marabito
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ SUREN A. HOVSEPIAN * March 28, 2003
- -----------------------------------------------------
Suren A. Hovsepian, Director

/s/ MARTIN H. ELRAD * March 28, 2003
- -----------------------------------------------------
Martin H. Elrad, Director

/s/ THOMAS M. FORMAN * March 28, 2003
- -----------------------------------------------------
Thomas M. Forman, Director

/s/ JAMES B. MEATHE * March 28, 2003
- -----------------------------------------------------
James B. Meathe, Director
</Table>

* The undersigned, by signing his name hereto, does sign and execute this Annual
Report on Form 10-K pursuant to the Powers of Attorney executed by the
above-named officers and Directors of the Company and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of such officers and Directors.

<Table>

By: /s/ RICHARD T. MARABITO March 28, 2003
- -----------------------------------------------------
Richard T. Marabito, Attorney-in-Fact
</Table>

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael D. Siegal, the Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Olympic Steel,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Company;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

(4) The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

(5) The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
controls; and

(6) The Company's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

By: /s/ MICHAEL D. SIEGAL

--------------------------------------------------------
Michael D. Siegal
Olympic Steel, Inc.
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

March 28, 2003

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard T. Marabito, the Chief Financial Officer of Olympic Steel, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Company;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
controls; and

By: /s/ RICHARD T. MARABITO

--------------------------------------------------------
Richard T. Marabito
Olympic Steel, Inc.
Chief Financial Officer

March 28, 2003