1
================================================================================
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION
ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to sec.240.14a-11(c) or sec.240.14a-12
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
(NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(NAME OF PERSON(S) FILING PROXY STATEMENT, IF OTHER THAN THE REGISTRANT)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[ ] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: .......
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: ..........
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): ............
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: ......................
(5) Total fee paid: .......................................................
[X] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid: ...............................................
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: .........................
(3) Filing Party: .........................................................
(4) Date Filed: ...........................................................
================================================================================
2
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
2001 CROCKER ROAD
SUITE 400
WESTLAKE, OHIO 44145
April 14, 1997
Dear Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 1997 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders of CleveTrust Realty Investors, which will be held at the Holiday
Inn - Westlake, 1100 Crocker Road, Westlake, Ohio, on Tuesday, April 29, 1997 at
2:00 p.m. (Cleveland Time). Extremely important proposals will be presented at
this meeting, including approval of a plan for the complete liquidation of the
Trust, and we ask that you consider them carefully.
The notice of the meeting, proxy statement and proxy accompany this
letter, and you are urged to consider the information therein. The Trust's
Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996 and
its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1996, are
being mailed to you herewith.
We hope you will attend the meeting in person, but we urge you in any
event to complete and return the enclosed proxy, at your earliest convenience,
in the enclosed prepaid envelope.
Sincerely yours,
John C. Kikol
Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer
& President
3
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
2001 CROCKER ROAD
SUITE 400
WESTLAKE, OHIO 44145
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
April 14, 1997
Dear Shareholder:
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of
CleveTrust Realty Investors, a Massachusetts voluntary association of the type
generally known as a business trust (the "Trust"), will be held at the Holiday
Inn - Westlake, 1100 Crocker Road, Westlake, Ohio, on Tuesday, April 29, 1997 at
2:00 p.m. (Cleveland Time), for the purposes of considering and acting upon:
- A proposal to approve a plan of termination and
liquidation of the Trust;
- A proposal to amend the Declaration of Trust's
requirements regarding shareholder approval for the disposition of
properties of the Trust;
- A proposal to ratify the Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement dated as of September 24, 1996, between the Trust and John
C. Kikol, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Trust;
- A proposal to elect as Trustees the five nominees named
in the accompanying Proxy Statement to hold office until the next
Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or until their successors are elected
and qualified; and
- Such other matters as may properly come before the
meeting and any postponement or adjournment or postponements or
adjournments thereof.
Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 14, 1997 are
entitled to vote at the meeting and any adjournment or adjournments thereof.
By Order of the Board of Trustees
Raymond C. Novinc
Secretary
IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOUR SHARES BE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. REGARDLESS OF
WHETHER YOU INTEND TO BE PRESENT, PLEASE SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY AND SEND IT BY
RETURN MAIL IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE, WHICH REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE
UNITED STATES.
4
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
2001 CROCKER ROAD
SUITE 400
WESTLAKE, OHIO 44145
PROXY STATEMENT
SUMMARY OF PROXY STATEMENT
This summary is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed
information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement of CleveTrust Realty
Investors (the "Trust").
APPROVAL OF PLAN OF LIQUIDATION
REASONS FOR THE LIQUIDATION. The Trustees believe that it is in the
best interests of the shareholders to liquidate the assets of the Trust, and
their objective is to complete such a liquidation by December 31, 1999. Other
alternatives, including an issuer self tender offer or the non-cash merger of
the Trust with another company were considered by the Trustees, but they
determined that the best alternative available to maximize value to the Trust's
shareholders would be to sell the Trust's assets and liquidate. In the Trustees'
view, the market value of the shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust
("Shares of Beneficial Interest" or "Shares"), prior to the time of the
announcement of the proposal to liquidate the Trust's assets, did not reflect
the underlying market value of its investments. Therefore, on September 24, 1996
the Trustees unanimously adopted a plan for the orderly liquidation of the
assets of the Trust and the winding up of its affairs (the "Plan"). See
"Termination and Liquidation of the Trust--Reasons for Termination and
Liquidation of the Trust."
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLAN. The Plan provides that the Trust will be
terminated and the Trustees will dispose of all of the assets of the Trust, wind
up its affairs, pay or adequately provide for the payment of all of its
liabilities and distribute to or for the benefit of its shareholders all of the
Trust's assets, including interests in any liquidating trust or other form of
liquidating entity established in connection with the complete liquidation of
the Trust.
ESTIMATED AMOUNTS AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION. If the Plan is approved,
the prices at which the Trust will seek to sell its real estate assets will be
determined by the Trustees. To date, four of the Trust's properties have been
sold and a conditional contract with a third party has tentatively established a
sales prices for one additional property. It is nevertheless impossible to
determine with any precision at this time the aggregate net proceeds that may
ultimately be available for distribution to the shareholders upon liquidation.
Assuming that the Trust's remaining real estate assets can be sold at
values currently estimated by management of the Trust and the Trustees, and
assuming management of the Trust and the Trustees have accurately estimated the
costs to sell the assets and the amounts necessary to satisfy liabilities of the
Trust, then the estimated net liquidating cash proceeds, if the Plan is
implemented, would be in a range of $6.00 to $6.50 per Share. However, caution
should be used in relying on this range, which assumes the continuation of
reasonably stable conditions during the entire liquidation period. Liquidating
distributions could be affected by changes in interest rates or the demand for
real estate investments generally, among other factors. While the Trustees
believe that the assumptions and projections used in arriving at this estimate
of net liquidating cash proceeds are reasonable, this estimated range
constitutes a forward-looking statement and there can be no assurance that such
assumptions will in fact prove correct or that actual sales or dispositions of
particular assets will not be at prices that vary materially from their
estimated values.
5
Approval of the Plan by the shareholders will constitute approval of
termination of the Trust and will authorize the Trustees to take any and all
actions that may be necessary or convenient to dispose of the assets of the
Trust and convert them into such form as may be conveniently distributed to the
shareholders by December 31, 1999, including selling, conveying, transferring or
otherwise disposing of the assets when and on such terms and subject to such
conditions as are deemed by the Trustees to be in the best interests of the
Trust and the shareholders, subject to the provisions of the Second Amended and
Restated Declaration of Trust, as amended, of the Trust (the "Declaration of
Trust"). The Trust does not intend to seek shareholder approval for the specific
terms and conditions of the sale of any of the properties except as required by
the Declaration of Trust. The Trustees propose that the Declaration of Trust be
amended so that no further shareholder approval will be required for any sales
of assets following approval by the shareholders of the termination of the
Trust. See "Amendment to Declaration of Trust Concerning Liquidation."
DISTRIBUTIONS. It is the current intention of the Trustees, if the Plan
is approved, to distribute the proceeds from the sales of Trust assets first to
the payment of or provision for the Trust's outstanding liabilities and then to
the shareholders in the form of periodic liquidating distributions.
VOTE REQUIRED TO APPROVE PLAN. The affirmative vote of the holders of
not less than two thirds of the outstanding Shares of Beneficial Interest is
required to approve the Plan. Trustees who hold, directly or indirectly,
approximately 70% of the outstanding Shares of Beneficial Interest have already
agreed to vote their Shares of Beneficial Interest in favor of approval of the
Plan.
NO APPRAISAL RIGHTS. Under Massachusetts law and the Declaration of
Trust, shareholders who vote against the Plan will not have any statutory
dissenters' rights to appraisal of their Shares.
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES. The distribution of the proceeds from
the sales of the Trust's assets will constitute a taxable transaction for
shareholders of the Trust. In general, if the Plan is approved, shareholders
will realize, for tax purposes, gain or loss equal to the difference between the
aggregate cash distributed to them from the liquidating distributions and their
tax basis in their Shares. Tax consequences for shareholders may differ
depending on their circumstances. Shareholders are encouraged to consult with
their own tax advisors. In addition, the Trust could incur certain taxes as a
result of the Plan. See "Federal Income Tax Consequences."
POSSIBLE RISKS OR DISADVANTAGES OF THE PLAN. The Plan is subject to
various risks including the following: The Trust may not be as successful as it
anticipates in disposing of assets; there may be decreased liquidity in the
market for the Shares of Beneficial Interest; the termination of the Trust will
jeopardize its value as an ongoing entity; and the Trustees will be empowered to
dispose of the assets of the Trust without further shareholder approval except
in certain limited circumstances. See "Termination and Liquidation of the Trust
- - -- Certain Risks or Disadvantages of the Plan."
AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF TRUST CONCERNING LIQUIDATION
The Declaration of Trust currently provides that separate approval by
not less than a majority of the outstanding Shares is required for any
disposition of all or substantially all of the Trust's property during
liquidation. The Trustees believe that this standard is unclear and overly
restrictive in its application and recommend adoption of an amendment to the
Declaration of Trust to permit all sales of assets in liquidation without
further shareholder approval even if the assets disposed of might be considered
substantially all of the assets of the Trust. See "Amendment to Declaration of
Trust Concerning Liquidation."
RATIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
In connection with the adoption of the Plan by the Board of Trustees,
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees approved an amendment and
restatement of the employment agreement between the Trust and John C. Kikol,
President and Chief
2
6
Executive Officer of the Trust. The revised agreement (the "Employment
Agreement") is subject to approval by the shareholders. The Employment Agreement
provides for, among other things, (i) replacement of Mr. Kikol's stock options
with a program for cash payments determined in relation to actual distributions
in liquidation, (ii) creation of an Incentive Compensation Program providing for
payments to Mr. Kikol based on liquidating distributions or other payments to
shareholders and (iii) continuation of existing arrangements requiring a
severance payment to Mr. Kikol in the amount of $546,000 in the event of Mr.
Kikol's termination by the trust(except on the grounds of Mr. Kikol's
misappropriation of Trust funds or property), his death or a material change in
his duties, which would include completion of the liquidation process. Trustees
who hold, directly or indirectly, approximately 70% of the outstanding Shares of
Beneficial Interest have agreed to vote their Shares in favor of approval of the
Employment Agreement. See "Ratification of Employment Agreement."
ELECTION OF TRUSTEES
The enclosed proxy will be voted, unless authority is withheld, for
the election of the nominees named herein as Trustees, to hold office until the
next meeting and until their respective successors are elected and qualified.
The nominees are Howard Amster, Robert H. Kanner, John C. Kikol, Leighton A.
Rosenthal and John D. Weil. All are currently serving as Trustees and have
indicated their willingness to continue to serve if elected. See "Election of
Trustees."
SOLICITATION AND REVOCATION OF PROXIES
The accompanying proxy is solicited by the Board of Trustees for use at
the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Trust to be held on April 29, 1997 and
any adjournment or adjournments thereof. Any proxy may be revoked by a later
proxy, by notice to the Trust in writing, or in open meeting, without affecting
any vote taken before such revocation. This proxy statement, together with a
form of proxy for the meeting, was first mailed to shareholders on or about
April 14, 1997.
OUTSTANDING SHARES AND VOTING RIGHTS
As of March 14, 1997, the record date for the determination of persons
entitled to vote at the meeting, there were 5,136,616 Shares of Beneficial
Interest outstanding. Each Share of Beneficial Interest is entitled to one vote.
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL HOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, as of March 14, 1997, information
furnished to the Trust with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Trust's
Shares of Beneficial Interest by each shareholder or group of shareholders known
to the Trust to be the beneficial owner of more than five (5%) percent of the
Trust's outstanding Shares of Beneficial Interest, each present Trustee, each
nominee for election as Trustee, each executive officer of the Trust, and all
present Trustees and executive officers of the Trust as a group.
BENEFICIAL OWNER, TRUSTEE, NUMBER OF SHARES
OFFICER OR NUMBER OF PERSONS BENEFICIALLY PERCENT OF
IN GROUP OWNED(a) CLASS
-------- ------- -----
Howard Amster (Beneficial owner and Trustee)(b) 1,152,180 22.4%
23811 Chagrin Blvd., Chagrin Plaza East
Suite 200
Beachwood, Ohio 44122
Robert H. Kanner (Beneficial owner and Trustee)(c) 1,300,000 25.3
3830 Kelley Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
John C. Kikol (Trustee and officer)(d) 70,979 1.4
2001 Crocker Road, Suite 400
Westlake, Ohio 44145
3
7
Leighton A. Rosenthal (Beneficial owner and Trustee) 393,000 7.7
The Halle Building, Suite 310
1228 Euclid Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44115
John D. Weil (Beneficial owner and Trustee)(e) 745,000 14.5
200 North Broadway, Suite 825
St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2573
Brian D. Griesinger (Officer) 7,000 *
2001 Crocker Road, Suite 400
Westlake, Ohio 44145
Raymond C. Novinc (Officer) 8,045 *
2001 Crocker Road, Suite 400
Westlake, Ohio 44145
Michael R. Thoms (Officer)(d) 28,055 *
2001 Crocker Road, Suite 400
Westlake, Ohio 44145
8 present Trustees and officers listed above 3,689,325 71.8
<FN>
- - ---------------------------
* Less than one percent.
(a) Except as noted, in each case the beneficial owner has sole voting and
sole investment power.
(b) Includes 131,800 Shares of Beneficial Interest held by Tamra F. Gould
(Mr. Amster's wife) in which Mr. Amster disclaims any beneficial
interest. Excludes 27,600 Shares of Beneficial Interest held by Sonia
Amster (Mr. Amster's mother) in which Mr. Amster disclaims any
beneficial interest.
(c) The shares shown as being held by Robert H. Kanner are owned by a trust
of which Mr. Kanner is the sole beneficiary. Mr. Kanner is not a
trustee of such trust and has neither investment nor voting power in
such shares. Trustees of such trust are Stephen R. Kalette and Eleonora
Grmek who have an address of 3830 Kelley Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44114.
Excludes 5,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest held by Buckeye Business
Products Bargaining Unit Pension Trust of which Mr. Kanner is a trustee
but not a participant.
(d) Includes 14,934 Shares of Beneficial Interest held in a trust in which
Messrs. Kikol and Thoms are trustees with all voting and investment
power and have an interest as beneficiaries (with respect to a portion
of the trust's assets). The shares of Beneficial Interest held by all
Trustees and officers as a group in the table have been adjusted to
eliminate the duplication of beneficial ownership.
(e) Includes 25,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest held in the name of a
family trust of which Mr. Weil is the trustee. Also includes 100,000
Shares of Beneficial Interest held in the name of Richard K. Weil (the
father of Mr. Weil), 25,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest held in the
name of Victoria L. Weil (the daughter of Mr. Weil) and 225,000 Shares
of Beneficial Interest in the aggregate held by Richard K. Weil, Jr.,
Mark S. Weil and Paula K. Weil (siblings of Mr. Weil), the beneficial
ownership of which he disclaims.
TERMINATION AND LIQUIDATION OF THE TRUST
REASONS FOR TERMINATION AND LIQUIDATION OF THE TRUST
After reviewing the Trust's prospects for achieving strategic goals, as
well as considering other alternative strategies to enhance shareholder value,
the Board of Trustees determined that either the Trust's assets should be sold
in an orderly
4
8
liquidation or the Trust should be sold in a merger or other business
combination. In the Trustees' view, the Trust has been unable to attract
substantial interest from the investment community. The Trustees base this
belief principally on the fact that average daily trading volume for the Shares
of Beneficial Interest during the period of January 1996 through August 1996 was
1,244 Shares and on 74 trading days there were no transactions in the Shares.
The Trust has also been unable to achieve growth necessary for it to be
competitive in today's real estate/REIT investment market. As stated in the
prospectus for the Trust's rights offering in 1993, it was the intention of the
Trust to use proceeds from that offering, in combination with mortgage
financing, to acquire additional suburban office buildings. Although the Trust
has completed acquisitions of several suburban office buildings as described
below, it has not added properties to its portfolio to the extent it
contemplated in 1993.
The Trustees believe that the Trust's difficulties in attracting
capital and achieving growth are the result of a combination of several factors.
One significant factor is that, in contrast to most real estate investment
vehicles that have been well received in the investment community in recent
years, the Trust does not have a portfolio of properties concentrated in a
single geographic region or a single property type with a unifying theme.
Instead, the Trust's portfolio remains significantly diversified by location and
type of property. In addition to a concentration of properties in the Southwest,
the Trust has one remaining property in Iowa, and a small land parcel in Ohio.
The foregoing properties include, among other property types, both suburban
office buildings and shopping centers. The Trust's attempts during the past
several years to implement a long-term strategy of being an owner and manager of
suburban office buildings have met with some success. For example, the Trust
purchased an office building in suburban Dallas in fiscal 1994 and one in 1995.
However, the Trust has not been able to implement this strategy on a scale of
sufficient magnitude to warrant, in the Trustees' view, a continuance of this
strategy.
Another factor is the Trust's lessened visibility within the REIT
industry. The Trustees believe that the Trust's visibility has been adversely
affected by the fact that, in comparison to other real estate companies, the
size of the Trust's portfolio is relatively small. The small size of the
portfolio has a further disadvantage in that the administrative expense ratio
for the Trust tends to be at a higher percentage of funds from operations than
the larger real estate investment trusts existing today. The Trustees also
believe that the modest public float of the Trust's Shares of Beneficial
Interest - approximately $6,960,000 at August 30, 1996 and the concentration of
ownership of the Trust in four principal shareholders, limits the attractiveness
of the shares to investors, particularly institutional investors that prefer to
invest in large increments in a float that presents greater liquidity.
As a result of the foregoing factors, the aggregate market value of the
Trust's Shares of Beneficial Interest --- approximately $23,757,000 at August
30, 1996 -- did not, in the Trustees' view, reflect the full value of the
Trust's portfolio. Because the disparity between the aggregate market value of
the shares of Beneficial Interest and the net value of the portfolio persisted
in spite of the Trust's attempts to take steps believed necessary to improve
shareholder value, the Trustees determined adoption of the Plan to be in the
best interests of shareholders in September, 1996.
In arriving at such determination, the Trustees evaluated alternatives
to adoption of the Plan for enhancing shareholder value. One alternative
considered by the Trustees was the sale of all or substantially all of the
assets of the Trust to a single buyer. However, due to the diversification of
the Trust's portfolio, the Trustees believed it unlikely at the time that
disposition of all or substantially all of the properties would provide
consideration in excess of that obtainable through disposition of individual
properties in an orderly liquidation of the Trust.
The Trustees also considered and rejected the possibility of continuing
the Trust's existing business and making new investments because they believed
that the Trust would continue to encounter the same difficulties it currently
faces, thereby perpetuating the dichotomy between the Trust's share price and
the value of its assets. The Trustees also elected not to rely on the
possibility of a merger or other
5
9
combination of the Trust with another company, based on the belief that the
interests of the shareholders would more likely be better served by the
distribution of the net cash sale proceeds to the shareholders rather than by
offering, in effect, a new investment alternative that holds no guarantee of
success.
Subsequent to adoption of the Plan by the Board, the Trustees
considered a possible partial liquidation to be followed by an issuer self
tender offer as an alternative to a complete liquidation. The self tender offer
would have been funded by borrowing the maximum amount available based on assets
of the Trust remaining after the sale of most of the Trust's portfolio. The
Trustees did not believe it would be feasible to borrow funds sufficient to
accomplish the transaction on terms that would allow payments to shareholders
materially in excess of amounts expected to be distributable from a complete
liquidation. They also believed successful implementation of this alternative
would be dependent upon rapid dispositions of properties while maintaining
certain assumed values in retained assets. They concluded the uncertainty
associated with such a plan would be greater than for a plan of liquidation.
Therefore, the Trustees determined not to pursue further the consideration of an
issuer self tender offer.
In the fourth quarter of calendar year 1996, the Trust received several
informal indications of interest from third parties, concerning possible
acquisition of a substantial majority of the Shares. In December, 1996 and
January, 1997 the Trust corresponded with and subsequently met with
representatives of a third party concerning a proposed offer to acquire a
controlling voting interest in the shares of the Trust. The proposal was based
on (i) an offering price of $6.45 cash in a tender offer to all of the
shareholders for up to seventy percent of the outstanding shares and (ii) a
requirement that the shares owned by certain Principal Shareholders be tendered
at $6.45 per share as part of the proposed transaction. In addition, a condition
of the proposal was that the Trust continue to be a publicly traded entity
following the transaction, with a substantially similar number of shareholders
and float. After consideration, the Board of Trustees determined that any
proposal that would allow a third party to gain voting control over the Trust
but that did not provide an opportunity for holders of all the outstanding
shares to sell at a single cash price per Share was unacceptable and would not
be pursued.
In January, 1997 RM Crowe Company, a Texas Corporation ("RMC")
submitted to the Trust a proposal for a possible offer to purchase all of the
outstanding Shares, and the Board of Trustees met with representatives of RMC.
The Trustees subsequently advised RMC that they were not prepared to recommend a
transaction at the price per Share proposed. By letter dated January 16, 1997,
RMC indicated to the Trustees that RMC would be prepared, subject to
satisfaction of various conditions, to enter into negotiations regarding an
agreement providing for a possible offer to purchase the Trust's shares at a
consideration of $6.42 per Share, in cash net to the sellers.
The Trustees evaluated the proposal from RMC in comparison to the Plan.
Principal factors considered by the Trustees included the proposed price per
Share, the relatively short time frame in which the Shares would be purchased
(as opposed to the possibility of a lengthier disposition of assets under the
Plan)and the potential savings resulting from the elimination of administrative
costs under the Plan
The Trustees proceeded to negotiate with RMC about the timing of any
possible offer and the conditions under which RMC would not be required to
proceed with the proposed offer. On February 19, 1997 the Trust, RMC and certain
shareholders of the Trust entered into a letter of intent, which provided that
the parties intended to negotiate definitive agreements pursuant to which RMC
would acquire all of the outstanding shares at a price of $6.42 per Share in
cash. On April 4, 1997, the Trust and RMC terminated negotiations concerning
RMC's proposal to acquire all of the outstanding shares at a price of $6.42 per
Share in cash. The Trust and RMC were unable to agree on certain terms in the
proposed definitive agreement. As a result, the Trustees have determined to
pursue the Plan as previously intended.
Based on the experience of the Trustees in considering opportunities
for the merger or combination of the Trust with another entity or the sale of
all or substantially all of the Trust's assets in a single transaction, the
Trustees believe that the highest potential value for the Trust's assets will be
realized by the
6
10
individual sale of the assets over a period of approximately three years. At the
time the Trustees adopted the Plan they believed that amounts could be realized
from sales of individual assets that would allow liquidating distributions of
approximately $5.00 to $6.50 per Share. This belief was based on estimates by
management of the Trust as to potential sales prices determined by dividing cash
flows from each property by capitalization rates considered reasonable by
management based upon their experience in the real estate industry. Actual
offers and contracts for sales of several properties since September 24, 1996
have tended to support or exceed the estimates by management, and the Trustees
have revised their estimated range to $6.00 to $6.50 per Share. This range is a
forward-looking statement and actual results may differ materially. For a
discussion of how the range was determined and factors that may affect it, see
"Termination and Liquidation of the Trust -- Implementation of the Plan." The
Trustees have not obtained independent appraisals of the value of individual
properties because they believe that opinions of appraisers would not be
materially more reliable than the opinions of the management of the Trust and
that only third party offers to purchase properties will provide a reliable
indication of value.
The Trustees have determined that, provided shareholder approval for
the Plan is obtained, the liquidation of the Trust's assets and the winding up
of the Trust's affairs will be completed by December 31, 1999, unless it is
determined in the future by the Board of Trustees that, due to circumstances at
that time, it is no longer in the best interests of the shareholders to complete
such liquidation and winding up by December 31, 1999, but, it is preferable to
complete it at a later date.
CERTAIN RISKS OR DISADVANTAGES OF THE PLAN.
Implementation of the Plan would present several risks to the holders
of Shares of Beneficial Interest, including the following:
NO ASSURANCES OF DISTRIBUTIONS. There can be no assurances that the
Trust will be successful in disposing of properties for values equaling or
exceeding those currently estimated by the Trust or that such dispositions will
occur as early as intended by the Trustees. If values of real estate generally
or the Trust's properties in particular decline, the liquidation may not yield
distributions as great as or greater than the recent market prices of the Shares
and distributions may not be effected for a significant period of time.
POSSIBLE DECREASING LIQUIDITY. As assets of the Trust are sold and
proceeds are distributed, the market capitalization and "float" will diminish
and market interest in the Shares of Beneficial Interest in the investment
community may diminish, thereby reducing the market demand and liquidity for the
Shares, which may adversely affect the market price for the Shares.
LOSS OF PUBLIC ENTITY VALUE. Once the Shareholders vote to terminate
the Trust, it will be committed to winding up. This fact jeopardizes any value
that a potential acquirer might place on the ability to acquire a publicly-held
entity with an indefinite life, and it may preclude other possible courses of
action not yet identified by the Trustees.
NO DISSENTERS' RIGHTS OF APPRAISAL. Neither Massachusetts statutes nor
the Declaration of Trust provides a procedure for a shareholder who dissents
from approval of the Plan to demand an appraisal of his Shares and payment of
their fair cash value.
POSSIBLE LOSS OF PERSONNEL. The approval of the Plan may cause
employees of the Trust other than its executive officers to consider other
employment because of the limited future of the Trust.
NO FURTHER SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL REQUIRED. If the shareholders also
approve the proposal to amend Section 13.1 of the Declaration of Trust (See
"Amendment to Declaration of Trust Concerning Liquidation"), the Trustees will
be empowered to dispose of properties without further shareholder approval even
if the assets disposed of may constitute substantially all of the assets of the
Trust.
7
11
TRUST BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES
The Trust is a voluntary business association generally known as a
business trust, organized under the laws of Massachusetts pursuant to its
Declaration of Trust.
The Trust's $37,493,000 of investments in real estate as of December
31, 1996, included the seven office buildings with a carrying value of
$18,618,000; five commercial properties with a carrying value of $18,855,000;
and one investment in land with a carrying value of $40,000. The Trustees
estimate that this portfolio can be sold on a property-by-property basis for
sales prices, net of selling costs, in excess of $48,000,000, before
liabilities. Three properties with an aggregate carrying value of $8,000,000
have been sold since December 31, 1996 for an aggregate sales price of
$14,775,000. See "Termination and Liquidation of the Trust -- Recent Events" for
information concerning pending dispositions of properties.
A list of the Trust's properties and certain information in respect
thereof are set forth in the Trust's 1996 Annual Report, a copy of which
accompanies this proxy statement.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN
Pursuant to Section 13.1 of the Declaration of Trust, the Trust may be
terminated at a meeting of the shareholders by the affirmative vote of holders
of not less than two thirds of the shares then outstanding and entitled to vote.
Section 13.1 provides in relevant part that, upon termination of the Trust:
(a) The Trust shall carry on no business except for the purpose of
winding up its affairs.
(b) The Trustees shall proceed to wind up the affairs of the Trust
and all of the powers of the Trustees under this Declaration of
Trust shall continue until the affairs of the Trust shall have
been wound up, including the power to fulfill or discharge the
contracts of the Trust, collect its assets, sell, convey, assign,
exchange, transfer or otherwise dispose of all or any part of the
remaining Trust Property to one or more persons at public or
private sale for consideration which may consist in whole or in
part of cash, securities or other property of any kind, discharge
or pay its liabilities, and do all other acts appropriate to
liquidate its business; provided that any sale, conveyance,
assignment, exchange, transfer or other disposition of all or
substantially all of the Trust Property shall require approval of
the principal terms of the transaction and the nature and amount
of the consideration by affirmative vote of not less than a
majority of all outstanding Shares entitled to vote.
(c) After paying or adequately providing for the payment of all
liabilities, and upon receipt of such releases, indemnities and
refunding agreements, as they deem necessary for their
protection, the Trustees may distribute the remaining Trust
Property, in cash or in kind or partly each, among the
Shareholders according to their respective rights.
Upon termination of the Trust and distribution to the
Shareholders as herein provided, a majority of the Trustees shall
execute and lodge among the records of the Trust an instrument in
writing setting forth the fact of such termination, and the Trustees
shall thereupon be discharged from all further liabilities and duties
hereunder, and the right, title and interest of all Shareholders shall
cease and be cancelled and discharged.
The Trustees propose that the shareholders approve termination of the Trust as
so provided. If the Plan is approved by the affirmative vote of holders of at
least two thirds of the outstanding shares, the Trustees will cease conducting
business, except that the Trustees will sell, convey, assign, exchange, transfer
or otherwise dispose
8
12
of the Trust's assets when and on such terms and conditions as are deemed by the
Trustees to be in the best interests of the Trust and its shareholders, and will
perform such other duties as are necessary to wind up the affairs of the Trust,
including the fulfillment or discharge of the Trust's contracts and the payment
of or provision for the Trust's liabilities. Approval by the shareholders is
assured because Trustees holding sufficient Shares to approve the Plan have
agreed to vote their Shares in favor of its approval.
It is not possible to determine with any reasonable degree of certainty
the aggregate net proceeds that may ultimately be available for distribution to
the Trust's shareholders upon consummation of the Plan. It is the objective of
the Trustees that, over a three-year period ending December 31, 1999 (the
"Liquidation Period"), sales of the Trust's assets be made for cash, securities
or other property of any kind as the Trustees deem appropriate. The Trust has
established targeted sales prices for each of the Trust's assets; however, there
can be no assurance that any or all of the properties will be sold at the
targeted sales prices established by the Trust or will be sold at all. The
amount of proceeds received from the disposition of individual properties is
dependent on a number of conditions, many of which are beyond the power of the
Trust to control, including market conditions at the time of each sale as well
as each property's performance and leasing status. Therefore, assets of the
Trust may be sold at prices that may not necessarily be equal to or greater than
their book value. Subject to the foregoing, however, it is estimated that the
net proceeds from the orderly disposition of the Trust's assets would permit the
Trust to make distributions to its shareholders aggregating approximately $6.00
to $6.50 per Share, allowing for the Trust's satisfaction of its obligations and
its payment of liquidation expenses. This estimate is a forward-looking
statement, and actual results could be affected by many factors, including
demand and availability in the market for the type and location of properties
owned by the Trust and the availability and terms of financing for commercial
real estate. To arrive at the estimated range, the annual operating results for
individual properties for the next three years were estimated by projecting the
cash flows from such properties (based on prior results adjusted for executed
and projected leasing). The resulting projected amount of annual cash flow of
each property was then divided by a capitalization rate deemed appropriate by
management of the Trust to arrive at an estimated market value. The
capitalization rates utilized ranged from 7.5% to 13.0%, based upon (i)
management's beliefs as to the competitive position of a property in its local
market (ii) the relative demand for similar properties, as perceived by
management of the Trust, based on their review of real estate transactions in
the relevant market during the past year and (iii) management's experience in
the purchase, financing, management and sale of various real estate properties.
The Trustees have not, at this time, obtained an independent appraisal of the
value of the individual properties held by the Trust.
To estimate the amounts that may be available for distribution from the
estimated sale proceeds, management of the Trust estimated selling costs of the
properties and assumed that net proceeds would be applied to satisfy outstanding
obligations of the Trust, first by paying mortgages on individual properties
sold and then by paying bank notes payable. Management estimated general and
administrative costs for the Trust during its liquidation process and assumed
the remaining balance of sale proceeds would be applied to pay incentive
compensation to management in accordance with employment agreements (See
"Ratification of Employment Agreement") and to make distributions to
shareholders. There can be no assurance that the Trust will be able to generate
sufficient net proceeds from the sale of the Trust's assets to permit the Trust
to make distributions in the range stated above, and the aggregate amount of
distributions ultimately made to shareholders might vary materially from such
amounts.
Because the Plan contemplates disposition of all of the assets of the
Trust and distribution of the net proceeds to shareholders but the terms of such
dispositions have not been determined, the Trust has concluded that pro forma
financial information concerning the Plan would not be meaningful.
The Trust does not intend to seek shareholder approval of the specific
terms and conditions of the sale of any of the properties, except to the extent
required by the Declaration of Trust. The Declaration of Trust currently
provides that separate
9
13
approval by not less than a majority of the outstanding Shares of Beneficial
Interest is required for any disposition of all or substantially all of the
Trust's property during liquidation. The Trustees believe that this standard is
unclear and overly restrictive in its application and recommend adoption of an
amendment to the Declaration of Trust to permit sales of assets in liquidation
without further shareholder approval. See "Amendment to Declaration of Trust
Concerning Liquidation." The Declaration of Trust would continue to (i) prohibit
the sale of Trust assets, directly or indirectly, to Trustees, officers or
employees of the Trust or its affiliates and (ii) require that sales of assets
to Affiliates (as defined in the Declaration of Trust) of Trustees, officers or
employees of the Trust be approved by disinterested Trustees.
Prior to the final distribution of the Trust's remaining assets to the
shareholders, Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust will continue to be
transferable, and the Trust's shareholders will continue to have such rights as
applicable law and the Declaration of Trust confer upon shareholders. It is the
intention of the Trustees to maintain the listing of the Trust's Shares of
Beneficial Interest on the Nasdaq National Market until they are no longer
eligible for trading. Once all of the Trust's assets have been sold and the net
proceeds have been distributed to the Trust's shareholders, or all of its
remaining assets have been transferred to a liquidating trust, the legal
formalities of terminating the Trust would be completed in accordance with the
terms of the Declaration of Trust and Massachusetts law.
In the event that approval of the Plan by affirmative vote of holders
of two thirds of the outstanding Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust is
not obtained, the Trust intends to continue to transact business and to consider
alternative courses of action.
On September 23, 1996, the day preceding the Trust's announcement of
the adoption of the Plan, the high bid and low asked prices of the Trust's
Shares of Beneficial Interest on the Nasdaq National Market were $4-5/8 and $5
per share, respectively. On April 10, 1997, the closing price of the Shares of
Beneficial Interest on the Nasdaq National Market was $5.875 per share.
RECENT EVENTS
In anticipation of the Shareholders' approval of the Plan, the Trust
did execute contracts for the sale of six properties. On October 7, 1996, the
Trust completed a $2,450,000 sale of the Littleton Bank Building located in
Littleton, Colorado. The sale resulted in a gain of approximately $563,000,
which is reported in the Trust's financial statements for first quarter of
fiscal year 1997. On January 21, 1997, the Trust completed a $5,950,000 sale of
the Warren Plaza Shopping Center located in Dubuque, Iowa, resulting in a gain
of approximately $1,726,000. On February 28, 1997, the Trust completed the
$3,475,000 sale of the Triangle Square Shopping Center/Mini Warehouse complex
located in Hilton Head, South Carolina, resulting in a gain of approximately
$2,550,000. On March 12, 1997, the Trust completed a $5,350,000 sale of the
Englewood Bank Building located in Englewood, Colorado, resulting in a gain of
approximately $2,300,000. The Trust currently has the Executive Club Building
located in Denver, Colorado under a contract of sale for a sales price of
$5,300,000. The Spring Village Shopping Center in Davenport, Iowa was also under
a contract of sale for a sales price of $5,350,000. In February, 1997, the buyer
decided not to pursue the acquisition of the Spring Village Shopping Center. The
same buyer has now submitted a new contract offer on the property. The buyer for
the Executive Club has completed an initial due diligence period and has a
non-refundable deposit placed with the title company. No assurance can be given
that the Executive Club Building will actually be sold at the price stated, or
that a contract for the Spring Village property will be signed. The sales price,
net of estimated selling costs, exceeds the carrying value or the net book value
of the property.
DISTRIBUTIONS
Liquidating distributions will be paid pro rata to the holders of
record of Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust at the close of business on
record dates to be determined by the Trustees. No distributions will be made
unless, in the opinion
10
14
of the Trustees, adequate provision for all of the debts and liabilities of the
Trust, including all expenses of any liquidating trust established, has been
made. Any net proceeds from sales not applied to satisfy mortgage indebtedness,
bank notes payable or other obligations of the Trust would be invested, pending
distribution, in short-term U.S. government securities. Distributions may be
made as a single distribution or as a series of two or more distributions and
would be made in such amounts, at such times and in such manner as the Trustees
may determine. The final distribution would be in complete redemption and
cancellation of all of the outstanding Shares of the Beneficial Interest of the
Trust, and upon such final distribution the Trustees may require shareholders to
surrender their share certificates to the Trust and cause such Shares to be
cancelled. If distributions cannot be made to a shareholder because mail is not
deliverable to the last known address of that shareholder on the shareholders
list maintained by the Trust, such funds will be held by the Trust subject to
the "unclaimed funds" or escheat statutes of the state of such last known
address. If such state does not have an escheat law, the law of Massachusetts
will govern. If funds are not claimed within the statutory periods, they may
escheat to such state.
LIQUIDATING TRUST
It is the intention of the Trustees, if the Plan is approved, to sell
all properties of the Trust within the Liquidation Period. There can be no
assurance, however, that sales can be completed as contemplated. If during the
three year liquidation period the Trustees conclude that additional marketing
efforts by the Trust will not likely result in the receipt of any reasonable
third party offers to purchase a property or properties within the established
targeted price range, the Trustees, after consideration of the tax consequences
to the Trust and its Shareholders, may determine to transfer such remaining
property or properties to an entity which for tax purposes will be treated as a
liquidating trust. The Trust will then be liquidated. The purpose of forming the
liquidating trust would be to make it more likely that the distributions made
pursuant to the Plan will be recognized under the Internal Revenue Code as
liquidating distributions by assuring that the Trust is liquidated within a
period of approximately three years. No further shareholder approval will be
required to authorize transfer of assets to a liquidating trust.
The transfer and assignment to the liquidating trust and the
distribution or allocation to the shareholders of the beneficial interests
therein would constitute a part of the final liquidating distribution by the
Trust to the shareholders of their pro rata interest in the remaining amount of
cash assets held by or for the account of the Trust. Upon such transfer and
assignment, certificates for shares of the Trust would be deemed to represent
certificates of interests in the liquidating trust. From and after the date of
the Trust's transfer of assets to a liquidating trust, the Trust would have no
interest of any kind in and to any such assets, and all of such assets would
thereafter be held by the liquidating trust solely for the benefit of the
beneficiaries of the liquidating trust, subject to any unsatisfied debts,
liabilities and expenses.
The sole function of a liquidating trust would be to manage and own
remaining assets until and in order that they may be liquidated, to satisfy all
then-remaining claims and liabilities of the liquidating trust, including fees,
costs, and expenses of the liquidating trust, and to distribute any remaining
assets to the beneficiaries of the liquidating trust. A liquidating trust would
not make a final distribution of assets until, in the sole judgment of the
trustees thereof, there remain no liabilities of or claims against the
liquidating trust except those of its beneficiaries with respect to their
interests therein. There can be no assurance that the Trustees or management of
the Trust would act in similar capacities with respect to the liquidating trust.
Any plan to transfer assets to a liquidating trust is only a
contingency plan to provide for the possibility that all Trust assets are not
sold during the Liquidation Period. Therefore, the Trustees have not determined
the detailed terms or structure for a liquidating trust. The characteristics of
any liquidating trust would be determined by the Trustees at a future date
depending upon such factors as (i) the number and value of properties to be held
by the liquidating trust, (ii) the potential tax attributes of the properties of
the liquidating trust and the tax consequences to the holders of interests and
the number of holders of interests in the liquidating
11
15
trust and the various values of their interests. The legal entity to be used as
the liquidating trust might be organized as a trust, a limited liability company
or other form of entity, in the discretion of the Trustees. The Trustees may
determine that interests in the liquidating trust should not be transferable
except in limited circumstances. Depending upon the assets of the liquidating
trust and the number of its record owners, it may not register under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and may not be required to file
reports or comply with proxy rules and other requirements under that act.
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following is a summary of the material federal income tax
consequences of the Plan based on federal income tax laws in effect on January
1, 1997. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive and does not describe
state or local tax consequences.
TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THE TRUST. The Trust is taxed as a corporation for
federal income tax purposes. Consequently, the Trust will recognize taxable gain
or loss on the sale of its properties measured by the difference between the
amount realized on the sale of a property and the Trust's adjusted tax basis in
the property sold. If any property is distributed in kind by the Trust to its
shareholders, the Trust will recognize gain, to the extent the fair market value
of such distributed property exceeds the Trust's adjusted tax basis in such
property, as if the distributed property had been sold to the distributee at its
fair market value. Any taxable gains from sales of properties or distributions
in kind may be offset by the Trust's net operating loss carryforwards, which at
September 30, 1996 were approximately $10,200,000. Management of the Trust
believes, based on its expectations concerning operations and dispositions of
properties if the Trust proceeds with the Plan in fiscal year 1997, that the
Trust will not incur federal income tax liability during fiscal year 1997 after
application of available net operating loss carryforwards. However, if the Trust
should sell any properties not currently under contract, then the Trust could
have taxable income in excess of net operating loss carryforwards resulting in
federal income tax liability.
Because more than 50% of the Trust's shares are owned by five or fewer
individuals, the Trust could be characterized as a "personal holding company" if
at least 60% of its adjusted ordinary gross income consists of "personal holding
company income" (basically passive income such as dividends, interest, royalties
etc.). If the Trust were characterized as a personal holding company it would be
subject to a special 39.6% tax on its undistributed personal holding company
income.
For purposes of the personal holding company test, rents are not
considered personal holding company income if such rents constitute 50% or more
of the Trust's adjusted ordinary gross income and if dividends exceeding a
minimum threshold are distributed each year. Therefore, since rents constitute
more than 50% of the Trust's income, if proceeds from property sales are
distributed rather than reinvested, the Trust should avoid personal holding
company characterization. However, if such sales proceeds are reinvested rather
than distributed, then the reinvestment would need to be made with careful
attention to the personal holding company rules in order to avoid the
application of the personal holding company tax.
TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THE SHAREHOLDERS. Provided that the Plan has
received shareholder approval pursuant to Section 13.1 of the Declaration of
Trust, distributions to shareholders pursuant to the Plan would, for federal
income tax purposes, be treated as distributions in liquidation of the Trust. A
shareholder would recognize gain or loss with respect to each Share held by the
shareholder, measured by the difference between (i) the total amount of
liquidating distributions, whether paid in cash, other property or a combination
of both, and (ii) the shareholder's tax basis in the Share. If a shareholder
holds two or more blocks of Shares having different tax bases, gain or loss
would be computed separately with respect to each block of Shares.
It is likely that more than one liquidating distribution would be made
to shareholders pursuant to the Plan. If so, each distribution would be first
applied against the adjusted tax basis of each Share held by a shareholder, and
gain would be
12
16
recognized with respect to a Share only after an amount equal to the adjusted
tax basis of such Shares has been fully recovered. Any gain or loss recognized
by a shareholder would be treated as capital gain or loss if the Shares are
considered capital assets in the shareholder's hands, and would be long-term
capital gain or loss if the Shares were held for more than a year prior to the
receipt of the distribution. Any losses with respect to a Share may be
recognized by a shareholder only after the Trust has made its final distribution
or after the last substantial distribution is determinable with reasonable
certainty.
In the absence of an approved plan of liquidation, any distributions
made to shareholders by the Trust from the sale of assets would be taxable as
ordinary dividend income (rather than liquidating distributions), first to the
extent of current earnings and profits and then to the extent of accumulated
earnings and profits.
Each shareholder is advised to consult his or her own tax advisor as to
the particular federal, state and local tax consequences resulting to such
shareholder from the Plan and transactions in connection therewith.
LIQUIDATING TRUST. It is possible that a liquidating trust may be used
to hold Trust properties remaining at the end of the three year liquidation
period. Management of the Trust intends that, if a liquidating trust is created,
it will qualify as a liquidating trust for federal income tax purposes. A
distribution of the Trust's remaining assets to such a liquidating trust would
be treated, for federal income tax purposes, as a distribution of such assets to
the shareholders followed by a contribution by the shareholders of the assets to
the liquidating trust. As a result, each shareholder would recognize gain or
loss upon the transfer of assets to the liquidating trust based upon the value
of the assets transferred, reduced by fixed liabilities assumed by the
liquidating trust. The shareholders would be taxed on all income earned by the
liquidating trust, whether or not such income is distributed. If a contingent
liability of the Trust is paid by the liquidating trust in a taxable year
subsequent to the liquidation, the payment of such liability would give rise to
a capital loss to the shareholders.
REQUIRED VOTE
Approval of the Plan requires the affirmative vote of holders of two
thirds of the outstanding Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust. Trustees
of the Trust holding, directly or indirectly, approximately 70% of the
outstanding Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust have agreed to vote their
Shares in favor of the Plan.
AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF TRUST CONCERNING LIQUIDATION
The Board of Trustees has determined to submit for approval of the
shareholders an amendment to the Declaration of Trust that, in the Board's view,
will facilitate implementation of the Plan. The amendment is set forth on
Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement.
Under Section 13.1(b) of the Declaration of Trust as currently in
effect, the Trustees may dispose of all or substantially all of the assets only
if the terms of the transaction and the nature and amount of consideration are
approved by the affirmative vote of holders of not less than a majority of
Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust entitled to vote. See "Termination
and Liquidation of the Trust -- Implementation of the Plan."
Under the Plan, the Trustees expect to dispose of the Trust's real
estate assets on a property-by-property basis. Section 13.1(b) as currently in
effect would require the Trustees to seek the approval of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust prior to
the sale of assets of the Trust that constitute "all or substantially all" of
the Trust's assets. Application of this requirement to the Plan is difficult
because the Plan contemplates not a bulk sale of all or substantially all of the
Trust's assets, but a series of sales on a property-by-property basis. As
individual properties are sold and the real estate assets held
13
17
by the Trust decrease, the effect of the provision may be to require the
Trustees to obtain shareholder approval of sales of the last property or
properties held by the Trust. It is likely that such a requirement would
materially hinder the Trustees' ability to dispose of such property or
properties on economic terms favorable to the Trust. In acknowledgment of the
foregoing it is proposed that Section 13.1(b) be amended to eliminate the
requirement for shareholder approval of any disposition in liquidation.
Section 13.1(b), as proposed to be amended, would allow the Trustees to
sell, exchange, transfer or otherwise dispose of any or all assets of the Trust
in one or more transactions, which may or may not be related, without approval
of the Trust's shareholders. Disposition of assets will be approved by the
Trustees applying their business judgment to determine whether the sale is in
the best interest of the Trust and the shareholders. The Trustees have not
established guidelines or criteria to make such determination. The Declaration
of Trust would continue to (i) prohibit the sale of Trust assets, directly or
indirectly, to Trustees, officers or employees of the Trust or its affiliates
and (ii) require that sales of assets to Affiliates (as defined in the
Declaration of Trust) of Trustees, officers or employees of the Trust be
approved by disinterested Trustees.
Pursuant to Section 13.1 of the Declaration of Trust, approval of the
amendment to the Declaration of Trust set forth on Exhibit A requires the
affirmative vote of holders of two thirds of the Shares of Beneficial Interest
then outstanding.
RATIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
In connection with the adoption of the Plan by the Board of Trustees,
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees has approved the Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement, effective as of September 1, 1996, between the
Trust and Mr. Kikol (the "Employment Agreement"), subject to the approval of the
Trust's shareholders. The Employment Agreement amends and completely restates
the terms of Mr. Kikol's employment as President of the Trust as formerly set
forth in an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 1,
1993 between Mr. Kikol and the Trust.
PURPOSE
The Trust entered into the Employment Agreement in order to induce Mr.
Kikol to remain as President to implement and oversee execution of the Plan or
other process of obtaining liquidity for the shareholders of the Trust, and to
provide incentive to Mr. Kikol to maximize the liquidating distributions to
shareholders of the Trust by tying his compensation to the aggregate amount of
such distributions.
SALARY, BONUS AND OTHER COMPENSATION
The Employment Agreement provides that the Trust will pay Mr. Kikol a
base salary, from the date of effectiveness of the Employment Agreement through
December 31, 1996, at a rate of $135,000 per year payable in semi-monthly
installments, plus a bonus of $47,000 payable on December 1, 1996. After
December 31, 1996, Mr. Kikol's base salary will be paid by the Trust at a rate
of $182,000 per year in semi-monthly installments.
Under the Employment Agreement, Mr. Kikol waived all rights to
unexercised stock options to purchase Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust
granted to him under the Trust's 1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan. In lieu of
such options, the Trust will pay to Mr. Kikol amounts based upon the liquidating
distributions to the Trust's shareholders from time to time (the "Payments"),
including a gross up amount (the "Gross Up Amount") that, when added to the
Payments, will allow Mr. Kikol to retain a net amount after payment of all
federal, state and local income taxes equal to the net amount of the Payments.
The Payments and Gross Up Amount will be paid to Mr. Kikol at the same time as
liquidating distributions are made to shareholders. The Payments are designed to
compensate Mr. Kikol in amounts similar to the liquidating distributions that he
would receive if he exercised the options prior to such distributions. The
Payments would be net of the exercise price of the respective options, and the
Gross
14
18
Up Amount would be paid in recognition of the fact that Mr. Kikol would have
been able to apply capital loss carryforwards to any capital gains he would
recognize on the sale of Shares of Beneficial Interest acquired through exercise
of the incentive stock options. The Trust believes that it will not be
economically disadvantaged by payment of the Gross Up Amount because the Trust
expects to be able to deduct for federal income tax purposes the full amount of
Payments and the Gross Up Amount, whereas it would not be entitled to any
deduction upon the exercise of incentive stock options.
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM
The Employment Agreement also provides for participation by Mr. Kikol
in an incentive compensation program for officers of the Trust (the "Incentive
Compensation Program"). Under the Incentive Compensation Program, an incentive
compensation pool is created for distribution to certain key employees. The
amount to be allocated to the pool is calculated based on amounts otherwise
available to be paid by the Trust as liquidating distributions to its
shareholders. The amount allocated to the pool will be the sum of: (a) 10% of
all amounts otherwise available for distribution between $4.75 and $5.50 per
Share; and (b) 15% of all amounts otherwise available for distribution in excess
of $5.50 per Share. For purposes of computing the amount payable to the pool,
liquidating distributions when made are reduced to their present value amount as
of January 1, 1997 using a discount rate of 10%. The amounts will be allocable
to the pool and available for distribution to the key employees at the same
time, and from time to time, as liquidating distributions are made to
shareholders. Mr. Kikol is entitled to receive not less than 80% of amounts
distributed from the pool.
If the Trust continues to hold properties at the end of the Liquidation
Period, the value of such properties will be considered a deemed distribution to
shareholders as of the end of the Liquidation Period in order to complete the
determination of all present valued liquidating distributions made during the
liquidation process. The Trust will then have the option of (i) allocating to
the pool an amount based on the deemed distribution of unsold properties
(reduced to a present value number and based on the 10%/15% formula described
above) or (ii) making an in kind allocation to the pool of an ownership interest
in the remaining unsold properties equal in value to the amount described in
(i).
If Mr. Kikol is terminated by the Trust (a) during 1998 and he has
failed to sell at least three Trust properties before the end of calendar year
1997 or (b) during 1999 or thereafter and he has failed to sell at least three
Trust properties during calendar year 1998, Mr. Kikol is entitled to an
immediate cash payment of $250,000 in lieu of any participation in the pool. If
Mr. Kikol's employment is terminated during 1997 or during the periods indicated
above and he has not failed to sell the required number of Trust properties as
described above, Mr. Kikol will be entitled to payments from the pool when pool
distributions are made, as if his employment had not been terminated. Mr. Kikol
will have this same entitlement if he voluntarily terminates his employment
because of a material change in his duties. If Mr. Kikol's employment is
terminated because of his death or disability and prior to such death or
disability the present valued liquidating distributions paid and payable from
the proceeds of sales of Trust properties equaled or exceeded $4.75 per share,
he or his personal representative, as the case may be, will be entitled to
receive distributions from the pool to the extent that prior pool distributions
have not taken into account such present valued liquidating distributions. If
Mr. Kikol is terminated for misappropriation of Trust funds or property in the
amount of $25,000 or more, or if he voluntarily terminates his employment with
the Trust other than because of a material change in his duties, he forfeits any
right to payment from the pool.
CERTAIN BENEFITS
The Employment Agreement provides for the continuation of certain plan
benefits currently provided to Mr. Kikol, including health and accident
insurance, retirement, group life insurance and similar plan benefits. Mr. Kikol
also is entitled to payment or reimbursement of business expenses, the use of an
automobile, the payment of club dues and the payment of premiums on an insurance
policy on his life.
15
19
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
The Employment Agreement may be terminated by either the Trust or Mr.
Kikol at any time and for any reason without prior notice to the other. If
terminated (i) by the Trust (except on the grounds of Mr. Kikol's
misappropriation of Trust funds or property) or (ii) by the death or disability
of Mr. Kikol or (iii) by Mr. Kikol because of a material change in his duties,
the Employment Agreement provides for a severance payment to Mr. Kikol in the
amount of $546,000. Completion of the liquidation process would constitute a
material change in Mr. Kikol's duties, entitling him to receive the full amount
of the severance payment at that time. Such severance payment will be paid only
if Mr. Kikol delivers to the Trust, prior to such payment, a release of all
claims against the Trust. The Employment Agreement automatically terminates upon
the death or disability of Mr. Kikol. This severance payment is in addition to
any payment to which Mr. Kikol may be entitled under the Incentive Compensation
Program described above.
PAYMENT OF LEGAL FEES
The Employment Agreement provides for the payment of Mr. Kikol's legal
fees and expenses under certain circumstances, including the failure of the
Trust to comply with its obligations under the Employment Agreement or in the
event that the Trust or any other person takes action to declare the Employment
Agreement void and unenforceable or institutes litigation to deny or recover
from Mr. Kikol the benefits intended to be provided under the Employment
Agreement.
EXCISE TAX GROSS UP PAYMENT
If amounts payable to Mr. Kikol under the Employment Agreement become
subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code,
he is entitled to a gross up payment such that, after the payment of the excise
tax and any federal, state or local income taxes on such gross up payment, he
retains a net amount equal to the amount he would have retained from payments
under the Employment Agreement had the excise tax not been applicable.
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
The Employment Agreement provides that, if so requested by the Trust by
means of 90 days advance written notice, Mr. Kikol will manage the remaining
unsold properties of the Trust, if any, upon completion of the liquidation
process, for an annual management fee equal to five percent of the "gross
property income" of such properties (i.e., gross rental receipts without
reduction for customary on-site expenses or reasonable travel expenses related
to such property) pursuant to a separate management agreement. Mr. Kikol's
duties under such an agreement would be, among others, to attend to routine
operational obligations associated with property management, administrative
matters, investor relations and public company duties. All salary and benefits
payable to Mr. Kikol under the Employment Agreement (other than those which
become payable prior to its termination) will cease at the commencement of the
term of the management agreement. Either party may terminate such management
services upon 90 days advance written notice to the other.
REQUIRED VOTE
Ratification of the adoption by the Board of Trustees of the Employment
Agreement requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of Shares of
Beneficial Interest represented at the meeting. Such ratification is assured
because Trustees of the Trust holding, directly or indirectly, approximately 70%
of the outstanding Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust have agreed to
vote their Shares in favor of ratification of the Employment Agreement.
ELECTION OF TRUSTEES
Unless authorization is withheld, it is intended that proxies received
will be voted in favor of electing as Trustees the five nominees named in the
following table to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until
their successors are elected and qualified. All nominees currently are members
of the Board of Trustees. No
16
20
nominee is related to any other nominee or Trustee. The election of each nominee
requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Shares of Beneficial Interest
represented at the meeting. Should any nominee decline or be unable to accept
nomination or to serve as a Trustee, events that the Board of Trustees does not
now anticipate, the proxies will be voted for the election of such other person,
if any, as the Board of Trustees may recommend.
Based upon information received from the respective Trustees as of
March 14, 1997, the following information with respect to each person is
furnished:
POSITION(S) WITH THE TRUST,
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION, BUSINESS
NAME (AGE) OF TRUSTEE EXPERIENCE AND OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS
- - --------------------- ----------------------------------
Howard Amster
(49)(a) Trustee of the Trust since December,
1992; Investment Consultant with Everen
Securities, Inc. (securities,
investments), Director of Astrex, Inc.
(distributor of electronic components).
Robert H. Kanner
(49)(b) Trustee of the Trust since December,
1992; President, Chairman and a Director
of Pubco Corporation (computer printer
supplies, manufacturing, and specialty
construction products). Until June 27,
1996, President, Chairman and a Director
of Bobbie Brooks, Incorporated and
Chairman and a Director of Aspen Imaging
International, Inc., which companies
were merged into Pubco Corporation on
that date. Director of Riser Foods, Inc.
(food distribution).
John C. Kikol
(53) Trustee of the Trust since 1982;
President of the Trust since 1974;
Chairman of the Trust since February,
1995.
Leighton A. Rosenthal
(81)(c) Trustee of the Trust since October,
1991; President LARS Aviation, Inc.
(private aircraft charters), Cleveland,
Ohio.
John D. Weil
(56)(d) Trustee of the Trust since June, 1991;
President Clayton Management Co.
(bookkeeping and investment management
services), St. Louis, Missouri. Director
of Cliffs Drilling (oil service),
Oglebay Norton Company (lake shipping,
mining and manufacturing), Physicians
Insurance Company of Ohio (medical
malpractice insurance) and Todd
Shipyards, Inc. (ship building and
repair company).
<FN>
- - -----------------------
(a) Chairman of the Audit Committee, which met twice during the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1996. The Audit Committee is responsible for
evaluating the services performed by the Trust's independent auditor,
the budget for those services and, with the Management of the Trust,
the Trust's allowance for possible investment losses.
(b) Chairman of Investment Committee, which met once during the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1996. The Investment Committee is responsible for
evaluating potential investments by the Trust.
(c) Chairman of the Nominating Committee, which met once during the fiscal
year ended September 30, 1996. The Nominating Committee is responsible
for reviewing the qualifications of prospective Trustees. The
Nominating Committee will consider individuals recommended by
shareholders for election at the 1998 Annual Meeting
21
of Shareholders, if any, provided such recommendations are received in
writing by September 16, 1997.
(d) Chairman of Compensation Committee, which met once during the fiscal
year ended September 30, 1996. The Compensation Committee is
responsible for reviewing the remuneration of Trustees and executive
officers.
Each Trustee is a member of all of the Committees of the Trust, except
that Mr. Kikol does not serve on the Compensation Committee.
Except as otherwise indicated in the above table, each Trustee has had
the principal occupation or former occupation indicated for more than five
years.
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996, there were four
regular meetings and one special meeting of the Board of Trustees. Each Trustee
other than Mr. Rosenthal attended at least 75% of the total number of Board
meetings and of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which he served.
In addition, the Board of Trustees regularly schedules informal workshop
sessions to review and discuss Trust business.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth the compensation awarded to, earned by
or paid to the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, who
was the only executive officer of the Trust whose total salary and bonus
exceeded $100,000 for fiscal 1996.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG-TERM
COMPENSATION
NAME AND FISCAL ------------- ALL OTHER
PRINCIPAL YEAR SALARY BONUSES OPTIONS COMPENSATION
POSITION ENDED $ $ GRANTED (1) $(2)
-------- ----- - - ----------- ----
John C. Kikol 9/30/96 $135,000 $47,000 -- $15,151
Chairman, President 9/30/95 135,000 47,000 3,000 $13,197
& Chief Executive 9/30/94 134,872 22,500 15,000 8,915
Officer
<FN>
- - ----------------------
(1) Mr. Kikol agreed to waive all rights with respect to options granted under the Trust's 1992 Stock Option
Plan in the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of September 24, 1996, between the Trust
and Mr. Kikol. See "Ratification of Employment Agreement."
(2) For fiscal 1996, represents the premium paid ($2,400) by the Trust for
a "key man" insurance policy for the benefit of the Chief Executive
Officer and his designated heirs and pension plan contribution
($12,751) for the Chief Executive Officer.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
Effective as of January 1, 1993, the Trust entered into an Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") with John C. Kikol, the Chief
Executive Officer of the Trust. The Agreement obligated the Trust to pay the
Chief Executive Officer an annual base salary, subject to increase at the
discretion of the Board. The Agreement also provided for an annual incentive
cash bonus to the Chief Executive Officer based upon financial goals to be
established by the Trust's Compensation Committee. Either the Trust or the Chief
Executive Officer had the right to terminate the Agreement at any time, for any
reason, without any prior notice to the other; however, in the event of the
Trust's termination of the Chief Executive Officer, or a material change in the
Chief Executive Officer's duties (other than for termination for a felony
conviction as
18
22
described in the Agreement), the Chief Executive Officer was entitled to a
severance payment equal to the product of the Chief Executive Officer's base
monthly salary plus one-twelfth of the officer's prior year's incentive cash
bonus multiplied by a factor of 1.5 times the number of years the Chief
Executive Officer was employed by the Trust or its previous Adviser, up to a
maximum factor of thirty-six. Had the Trust elected to terminate the Chief
Executive Officer as of December 31, 1996, the Trust would have been obligated
to pay Mr. Kikol the sum of $546,000 as a severance payment under the Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event the Chief Executive Officer refused
to accept a transfer to a location outside the Cleveland area where the Trust
has a substantial investment, the Trust's obligation for severance payment set
forth above would be reduced to 50% of the above maximum severance payment. The
Agreement also contained certain other provisions customary in executive
compensation and employment agreements.
The terms of Mr. Kikol's employment with the Trust were amended and
completely restated by the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as
of September 24, 1996, between the Trust and Mr. Kikol (the "Employment
Agreement"). The Employment Agreement will be deemed to have become effective
September 1, 1996, provided that the shareholders of the Trust approve the
Employment Agreement. See "Termination and Liquidation of the Trust" and
"Ratification of Employment Agreement."
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Trust's Board of Trustees has delegated to the Compensation
Committee the responsibility to implement a short-term and long-term
compensation program for the Trust's executive officers. The Committee consists
of all Trustees with the exception of Mr. Kikol.
The Trust's executive compensation program as in effect prior to
September 1, 1996 was designed to attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified
executive officers that are dedicated to the short-term and long-term success of
the Trust. An important objective of the compensation program was to integrate
the compensation of the executive officers with the performance of the Trust.
Subject to the terms of the Agreement dated January 1, 1993 between the Trust
and the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), the Compensation Committee reviewed
annually the compensation of the CEO and subjectively evaluated his performance
in determining any possible adjustments to compensation. The Compensation
Committee also reviewed the recommendations of the CEO as to the base salary of
the other executive officers. For fiscal 1996 the Compensation Committee paid
bonuses to all employees of the Trust including Mr. Kikol which were comparable
to the actual sums distributed as bonuses to employees for fiscal 1995. The
determination of bonuses is subjective, but the principal factor considered by
the Compensation Committee is the performance by the Trust in Funds from
Operations.
Prior to September 1, 1996 executive compensation also included the
annual consideration of stock option grants as a long-term incentive to the
officers. During fiscal 1996 no grants of stock options were made to officers of
the Trust.
On September 24, 1996 at a Special Meeting of the Board of Trustees,
the Trustees unanimously voted to recommend that a proposal to approve a plan of
termination and liquidation of the Trust be submitted to the shareholders of the
Trust for approval at the 1997 Annual Shareholders Meeting, or that the Trust
properties be otherwise disposed of in a merger, consolidation or similar
transaction (the "Liquidation Process"). As a result, the Board authorized the
Compensation Committee to revise all of the Trust's existing employment
agreements to provide for new incentives to retain the Trust's key employees
during the Liquidation Process in order to maximize the amount of liquidating
distributions to the shareholders, which the Board concluded would be in the
best interest of all the shareholders. Accordingly, the Trust's existing
employment agreements were modified and the following compensation benefits were
approved by the Compensation Committee subject to approval of the Liquidation
Process by the Trust's shareholders:
(i) each officer will receive a performance bonus for fiscal 1996,
based on the current incentive bonus compensation program;
19
23
(ii) effective January 1, 1997, the base compensation due each
officer will be increased to include the fiscal 1996
performance bonus, which will be payable in semi-monthly
installments during the Liquidation Process;
(iii) in return for each officer waiving all rights with respect to
unexercised existing stock options under the Trust's 1992
Stock Option Plan, the Trust will make additional compensation
payments to the officer in an amount by which all future
liquidation distributions on a per share basis exceed the
officer's original option price. In addition to the payments
in lieu of options, the Trust shall also pay to the officer a
"tax gross up amount" which is based on the difference between
the ordinary income tax rate to which such payments will be
subject for federal income tax purposes and the capital gains
rate which could have applied for federal income tax purposes
to the sale of Shares of Beneficial Interest acquired by
exercise of stock options, with Mr. Kikol also to receive an
amount to compensate him for an inability to utilize capital
loss carryforwards from the disposition of other Shares of
Beneficial Interest owned by Mr. Kikol to offset the income
from the additional compensation payments; and
(iv) an incentive compensation pool created primarily for Mr.
Kikol's benefit that reflects all cash liquidation
distributions of the Trust resulting from sales of the
properties. The potential pool shall be determined by the
timing and amount of cash which is available for the
liquidating distributions, based upon the following formula:
(a) 10% of the present value of all distributions between
$4.75 per share and $5.50; and (b) 15% of the present value of
all distributions in excess of $5.50 per share. See
"Ratification of Employment Agreement."
The Employment Agreement between the Trust and Mr. Kikol will be
effective September 1, 1996, provided that as conditions subsequent the Trust's
shareholders approve the Employment Agreement and the Liquidation Process.
Trustees of the Trust holding, directly or indirectly, approximately 70% of the
shares outstanding have agreed to vote in favor of the proposals to approve the
Amended Agreement and the Liquidation Process.
Compensation Committee
John Weil, Chairman Robert H. Kanner, Member
Howard Amster, Member Leighton Rosenthal, Member
20
24
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON
The following graph represents the return that would have been realized
by an investor assuming an investment of $100.00 on October 1, 1991 and assuming
that any distributions were reinvested through fiscal year ended September 30,
1996.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
CTRI VS NASDAQ COMPOSITE INDEX
VS NAREIT ALL REIT TOTAL RETURN INDEX
[GRAPHIC OMITTED]
9/30/91 9/30/92 9/30/93 9/30/94 9/30/95 9/30/96
NASDAQ 100 111 145 145 198 233
CTRI 100 84 139 117 159 198
NAREIT 100 113 148 142 158 191
The Trust believes the information provided in the above performance graph has
only limited relevance to an understanding of the Trust's compensation policies
during the indicated period as the Trust believes that the graph does not
reflect all matters appropriately considered by the Trust in developing its
compensation strategy.
TRUSTEE COMPENSATION
The Trust compensates all Trustees (other than Mr. Kikol, who does not
receive fees for service as a Trustee) at a rate of $8,000 per annum which is
paid in quarterly installments of $2,000, said sum being in lieu of all meeting
and other fees. In addition, all Trustees are reimbursed for actual expenses
incurred in connection with meetings attended or extended services provided.
21
25
ANNUAL REPORT
The Trust's Annual Report to Shareholders for its fiscal year ended
September 30, 1996, including financial statements, is being mailed to
shareholders herewith.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Ernst & Young LLP ("Ernst & Young") has been appointed as the Trust's
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1997 pursuant to
the recommendation of the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees. Ernst &
Young has served as the Trust's independent auditors since the Trust was formed
in 1971. A representative of Ernst & Young is expected to be present at the
Annual Meeting with an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to
do so and to respond to appropriate questions with respect to that firm's
examination of the Trust's financial statements and records for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1996.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
The deadline for shareholders to submit proposals to be considered for
inclusion in the proxy statement for the 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is
December 30, 1997.
GENERAL INFORMATION
The cost of soliciting proxies on behalf of the Board of Trustees will
be paid by the Trust. Solicitations may be made by personal interview, mail,
telegram or telephone. Arrangements will be made with brokerage houses and other
custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to send proxies and proxy material to their
principals, and the Trust may reimburse them for their expenses in so doing.
Also, officers of the Trust, as yet undesignated, may request the return of
proxies by telephone, telegram or in person.
Financial and other reports will be submitted at the meeting, but it is
not intended that any action will be taken with respect to approval of the
matters referred to in those reports. Shares represented by properly executed
proxy cards will be voted as specified. It is intended that shares represented
by proxies on which no specification has been made will be voted for the
election of the nominees for Trustee named herein or such substitute nominees as
the Board of Trustees may designate and for the proposals described in this
Proxy Statement. Shares of Beneficial Interest as to which authority to vote is
withheld and broker non-votes will be counted as present for quorum purposes.
For purposes of the election of Trustees, Shares of Beneficial Interest as to
which authority to vote is withheld with respect to any Trustee will have the
same effect as a vote against the Trustee, and broker non-votes will not be
counted and thus will have no effect. For purposes of the proposals to approve
the Plan and amendments to the Declaration of Trust, abstentions and broker
non-votes will have the same effect as votes cast against the proposal. For
purposes of the proposal to ratify the Amended Agreement, abstentions will have
the same effect as votes cast against the proposal and broker non-votes will not
be counted and will have no effect.
22
26
INCLUSION OF CERTAIN OTHER DOCUMENTS
The Trust's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 1996 (the "1996 Form 10-K") and the Trust's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1996 (the "Form 10-Q") have been
filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, and are delivered to shareholders of the Trust herewith
as part of this Proxy Statement.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board of Trustees is not aware that any other matters will be
brought before the meeting for action, but if any other matters shall properly
come before the meeting it is intended that the persons authorized under proxies
solicited on behalf of the Board of Trustees may, in the absence of instructions
to the contrary, vote or act thereon in accordance with their best judgment.
By Order of the Board of Trustees
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
Raymond C. Novinc
Secretary
IMPORTANT
TO ASSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE MEETING, PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE
ENCLOSED PROXY PROMPTLY.
23
27
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO SECTION 13.1 OF DECLARATION OF TRUST
Section 13.1(b) shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:
The Trustees shall proceed to wind up the affairs of the Trust and all
of the powers of the Trustees under this Declaration of Trust shall continue
until the affairs of the Trust shall have been wound up, including the power to
fulfill or discharge the contracts of the Trust, collect its assets, sell,
convey, assign, exchange, transfer or otherwise dispose of all or any part of
the remaining Trust Property to one or more persons at public or private sale
for consideration which may consist in whole or in part of cash, securities or
other property of any kind, discharge or pay its liabilities, and do all other
acts appropriate to liquidate its business, including but not limited to the
transfer of Trust Property to a liquidating trust or similar entity.
24
28
PROXY - CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
John C. Kikol and Raymond C. Novinc, and each of them, with full power
of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and to vote as designated
on the reverse side of this proxy card the shares of the undersigned at the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders of CleveTrust Realty Investors, to be held on
February 25, 1997 and at any adjournment:
(PLEASE READ REVERSE SIDE.)
- - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE MARK YOUR
A X VOTES AS IN THIS
--- EXAMPLE.
FOR all nominees WITHHOLD
listed at right (except AUTHORITY
as indicated to the to vote for all nominees
contrary below.) listed at right
4. Election of [ ] [ ] NOMINEES: Howard Amster
Trustees for Robert H. Kanner
the terms of John C. Kikol
office specified in the Proxy Statement. Leighton A. Rosenthal
John D. Weil
(INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any
individual at right ??? that nominee's name in the space
below.)
- - ------------------------------------
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
1. Proposal to approve a plan or termination [ ] [ ] [ ]
and liquidation of the Trust as specified
in the Proxy Statement.
[ ] [ ] [ ]
2. Proposal to approve an amendment to
the Declaration of Trust as specified in
the Proxy Statement.
3. Proposal to ratify the Amended and [ ] [ ] [ ]
Restated Employment Agreement dated
as of September 24, 1996, between the
Trust and John C. Kikol, President of
the Trust.
4. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other
matters as may properly come before the meeting and any adjourn-
ment or adjournments thereof.
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE NOMINEES
LISTED HEREON AND FOR PROPOSALS 2, 3, AND 4.
PLEASE DATE AND SIGN PROXY EXACTLY AS NAME APPEARS ON THIS
CARD AND RETURN THE PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. NO
POSTAGE IS NECESSARY IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES.
SIGNATURE Date Date
---------------------- --------- -------------------------- ----------
SIGNATURE IF HELD JOINTLY
NOTE: When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please
give full title as such. If signer is a corporation, please sign in the
full corporation name by duly authorized officer or officers.
- - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
29
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
X QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 1996
OR
____ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________________ to _______________________
Commission File Number 0-5641
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts 34-1085584
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
2001 Crocker Road, Suite 400
Westlake, Ohio 44145
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(216) 899-0909
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
Former name, former address and former fiscal year if changed since last report
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
--- ---
Shares of Beneficial Interest Outstanding at February 7, 1997: 5,136,616
30
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
INDEX
Number Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Item 1. Financial Statements
Statement of Financial Condition
-- December 31, 1996 and September 30, 1996 3
Statement of Operations
-- Three Months ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 4
Statement of Cash Flows
-- Three Months ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 5
Notes to Financial Statements 6
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations 8
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 9
Item 2. Changes in Securities 9
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities 9
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 9
Item 5. Other Information 9
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 9
-2-
31
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
DECEMBER 31, 1996 SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
----------------- ------------------
(in thousands)
ASSETS
- - ----------------------------
Invested assets - NOTE B:
Properties held for sale 40,800 42,203
Valuation reserve 3,307 3,307
-------- --------
37,493 38,896
Real estate mortgage loans 82 119
-------- --------
37,575 39,015
Cash and cash equivalents 1,082 1,490
Other assets 1,317 3,347
-------- --------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 39,974 $ 43,852
======== ========
LIABILITIES
- - ----------------------------
Mortgage notes payable - NOTE C $ 8,301 $ 9,563
Bank notes payable - NOTE D 6,000 9,800
Accrued interest on notes payable 6 14
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 2,273 1,975
-------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES 16,580 21,352
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Shares of Beneficial Interest, par value $1 per Share:
Authorized -- Unlimited
Issued and outstanding shares
(12/31/96 - 5,136,616; 9/30/96 - 5,179,143) 5,137 5,179
Additional paid-in capital 38,690 38,850
Accumulated deficit (20,433) (21,529)
-------- --------
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 23,394 22,500
-------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 39,974 $ 43,852
======== ========
See notes to financial statements.
-3-
32
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
The following statement of operations of CleveTrust Realty Investors for the
three-month periods ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively, is
unaudited, but in the opinion of management includes all adjustments necessary
to present fairly the results of operations. All such adjustments were of a
normal, recurring nature. The results of operations for the three-month period
ended December 31, 1996 are not necessarily indicative of the results of
operations for succeeding periods.
Three Months Ended
----------------------------
12/31/96 12/31/95
------------ -----------
(in thousands, except per share data)
INCOME
- - ---------------------------------------
Real estate operations:
Rental Income $2,492 $2,567
Less: Real estate operating expenses 1,106 1,252
Less: Depreciation expense 0 450
------ ------
1,106 1,702
------ ------
Income from real estate operations 1,386 865
Interest income 20 8
Dividend income 0 61
Other 2 2
------ ------
1,408 936
EXPENSES
- - ---------------------------------------
Interest:
Mortgage notes payable 184 222
Bank notes payable 168 188
------ ------
352 410
General and administrative - NOTE E 536 195
------ ------
888 605
------ ------
OPERATING INCOME 520 331
Gains on sales of real estate - NOTE B 576 0
------ ------
NET INCOME $1,096 $331
====== ======
Per Share of Beneficial Interest - NOTE F:
Operating income 0.10 0.06
Gains on sales of real estate 0.11 0.00
------ ------
NET INCOME PER SHARE $0.21 $0.06
====== ======
Weighted Average Number of Shares of
Beneficial Interest Outstanding 5,143 5,217
====== ======
See notes to financial statements.
-4-
33
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Three Months Ended
------------------------------
12/31/96 12/31/95
------------- ------------
(in thousands)
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $1,096 $331
Non-cash revenues and expenses included in income:
Depreciation expense 0 450
Decrease (increase) in other assets 2,030 (25)
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest on notes payable (8) 11
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities 298 (34)
Reconciliation to net cash flow from operating activities:
Gains on sales of real estate (576) 0
------- -------
Cash Flow From Operating Activities 2,840 733
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Equity investments:
Improvements to existing properties (373) (236)
Proceeds from properties sold 2,351 0
(Increase) in investments in securities 0 (2,057)
Real estate mortgage loan repayments 37 87
------- -------
Cash Flow (Used in) From Investing Activities 2,015 (2,206)
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Mortgage notes payable:
Principal borrowings 0 500
Principal amortization payments (53) (45)
Principal repayments (1,208) 0
Bank notes payable:
Borrowings 0 2,000
Repayments (3,800) 0
Shares repurchased and subsequently retired (202) (174)
Distributions to shareholders 0 (209)
------- -------
Cash Flow (Used In) From Financing Activities (5,263) 2,072
------- -------
(Decrease) increase in cash and short-term investments (408) 599
Balance at beginning of year 1,490 188
------- -------
Balance at end of period $1,082 $787
======= =======
See notes to financial statements.
-5-
34
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 1996
NOTE A - INCOME TAXES
The Trust had no income tax expense for the three month period ended December
31, 1995 or for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996. The Trust had no
income tax expense for the three month period ended December 31, 1996 and it
expects to have no income tax expense for the fiscal year ended September 30,
1997.
The Trust had a net deferred tax asset position at December 31, 1995 and
September 30, 1996 of approximately $2,455,000 and $2,567,000, respectively. The
Trust maintains a valuation reserve equal to its net deferred tax asset as there
is doubt as to whether the net deferred tax will be realized.
NOTE B - INVESTED ASSETS
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be
Disposed of," the Trust's properties are reported in the Trust's financial
statements at the lower of carrying value or estimated fair value, less cost to
sell. The Trust reviews long-lived assets whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. On September 24, 1996 the Trustees of the Trust unanimously voted
to recommend a Plan for the Orderly Liquidation of the Trust (the "Plan"). The
Plan, as proposed, would involve the sale of the Trust's properties during a
period of approximately three years. Based on the announcement the Trust has
reclassified all of its properties at September 30, 1996, in accordance with
SFAS No. 121, to Properties Held for Sale. Additionally, because the Trust has
classified all properties as properties held for sale the Trust stopped
recording depreciation as of October 1, 1996. A review of the carrying value of
all the properties at September 30, 1996 determined that four properties had a
carrying value higher than the estimated fair value, less cost to sell.
Therefore, a valuation reserve, which totals $3,307,000, was established for
these four properties to lower their carrying value to their estimated fair
value, less cost to sell. A review at December 31, 1996 determined that there
has been no significant change to any of the properties, and, therefore, no
change in the valuation reserve was required.
On October 7, 1996 the Trust completed a $2,450,000 sale of the Littleton Bank
Building located in Littleton, Colorado. This sale resulted in a gain of
approximately $563,000. Additionally, on December 30, 1996 the Trust completed a
$20,000 sale of a .23 acre land parcel located in Dubuque, Iowa. This sale
resulted in a gain of approximately $13,000.
NOTE C - MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE
In connection with the October 7, 1996 sale of the Littleton Bank Building,
referenced in Note B above, the Trust repaid in full, the $1,208,000 first
mortgage loan, which was secured by the Littleton Bank Building.
-6-
35
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
NOTE D - BANK NOTES PAYABLE
The Trust has a revolving line of credit ("1994 Credit") issued by National City
Bank of Cleveland ("NCB") and Manufacturer's and Traders Trust Company of
Buffalo, New York ("M&T"), which was signed effective November 30, 1994. The
1994 Credit is for up to $25,000,000 (but is limited by the value of the
collateral provided). Of this amount a maximum of $15,000,000 is currently
available and $10,000,000 will be available upon payment of an activation fee of
3/4 of 1% on the $10,000,000. Interest will be at either i) 1/4 of 1% over the
prime rate; ii) 250 basis points over the LIBOR rate; or iii) NCB's fixed
interest rate available from time to time. Additionally, a commitment fee of 3/8
of 1% is due on any funds available but not borrowed. The initial term was for
three years. Each year the lenders will review the 1994 Credit with the right to
extend it for one additional year. The lenders have extended the 1994 Credit
through March 1, 1999. At December 31, 1996 the outstanding balance was
$6,000,000. At September 30, 1996 the outstanding balance was $9,800,000. The
1994 Credit is secured by certain of the Trust's real estate and contains
certain covenants including a covenant for a minimum shareholders' equity. At
December 31, 1996 the amount of shareholders' equity free from such restrictions
was approximately $3,394,000.
NOTE E - GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Included in the general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended
December 31, 1996 was $74,000 of expenses related to the Plan for the
liquidation of the Trust. Additionally, in connection with the Plan, the Trust
would make severance payments to the officers and employees of the Trust upon
their termination. The defined obligation totals $1,247,000. Certain other
severance payments will be made depending on the Trust's ability to achieve
defined distributions to the shareholders. The Trust is accruing the defined
severance obligations over a period of one year, with the exception of Mr.
Kikol's severance which is being accrued over an eighteen month period.
Therefore, $266,000 of these defined employee severance payments was accrued and
expensed during the quarter ended December 31, 1996.
NOTE F - NET INCOME PER SHARE
Net income per Share of Beneficial Interest has been computed using the weighted
average number of Shares of Beneficial Interest outstanding each period.
NOTE G - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On January 21, 1997 the Trust completed a $5,950,000 sale of the Warren Plaza
Shopping Center located in Dubuque, Iowa. This sale resulted in a gain of
approximately $1,726,000 which will be reported in the second quarter ended
March 31, 1997. The net sales proceeds of approximately $5,870,000 together with
available cash were used to repay in full the $6,000,000 balance of the 1994
Credit.
Effective February 6, 1997 the Trust terminated the 1994 Credit Agreement.
-7-
36
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
At December 31, 1996 the Trust's Invested assets were comprised of properties
held for sale, net of a $3,307,000 valuation reserve, of $37,493,000 and one
real estate mortgage loan totaling $82,000. This compared with properties held
for sale, net of a $3,307,000 valuation reserve, of $38,896,000 and two real
estate mortgage loans totaling $119,000 at September 30, 1996. The change since
year end was the net result of the Trust completing the October 7, 1996 sale of
the Littleton Bank Building, located in Littleton, Colorado and the sale of a
.23 acre land parcel located in Dubuque, Iowa, spending $373,000 on improvements
to existing properties, and receiving $37,000 in real estate mortgage loan
repayments. Other assets decreased $2,030,000 from September 30, 1996 to
December 31, 1996. Of this amount $1,918,000 represents a receivable established
by the Trust as due on its sale of securities in September, 1996, which funds
were received by the Trust on October 1, 1996.
In connection with the October 7, 1996 sale of the Littleton Bank Building the
Trust repaid the $1,209,000 first mortgage loan which was secured by that
property. Also, the Trust reduced the bank notes payable by making paydowns
totaling $3,800,000 on the 1994 Credit, primarily from the funds received in
connection with the sale of securities in September, 1996 and the net proceeds
from the sale of the Littleton Bank Building.
The $894,000 increase in shareholders' equity at December 31, 1996 from
September 30, 1996 was the net effect of the Trust repurchasing and retiring
42,527 shares at a total cost of $202,000 and recording net income of
$1,096,000.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Income from real estate operations during the quarter ended December 31, 1996
increased $521,000 (60%) when compared to the quarter ended December 31, 1995.
Rental income for the quarter ended December 31, 1996 decreased $75,000 (3%)
compared to the quarter ended December 31, 1995. Real estate operating expenses
decreased $146,000 (12%) in the three months ended December 31, 1996 versus
1995. The decline in rental income and real estate operating expenses was
primarily due to the sale of the European Crossroads retail center in March,
1996, the sale of two of the five buildings in the Walnut Stemmons Office Park
in September, 1996 and the above referenced sale of the Littleton Bank Building
in October, 1996. Because the Trust has classified all of its properties as
properties held for sale, there was no depreciation expense recorded for the
quarter ended December 31, 1996, compared to $450,000 of depreciation expense
recorded for the quarter ended December 31, 1995.
The $58,000 (14%) decrease in interest expense for the three month period ended
December 31, 1996 when compared to the same period one year ago was primarily
due to less borrowings outstanding, as the Trust repaid one first mortgage loan
and made a paydown on the 1994 Credit, as referenced above. The $341,000
increase in general and administrative expenses when comparing the quarter ended
December 31, 1996 to the same quarter one year ago, was primarily due to the
Trust recording $74,000 of expenses related to the Plan for the liquidation of
the Trust. Additionally, in connection with the Plan, the Trust would make
severance payments to the officers and employees of the Trust upon their
termination. The
-8-
37
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)
defined obligation totals $1,247,000. Certain other severance payments will be
made depending on the Trust's ability to achieve defined distributions to the
shareholders. The Trust is accruing the defined severance obligations over a
period of one year, with the exception of Mr. Kikol's severance which is being
accrued over an eighteen month period. Therefore, $266,000 of these defined
employee severance payments was accrued and expensed during the quarter ended
December 31, 1996. There were no like expenses during the quarter ended December
31, 1995.
For the quarter ended December 31, 1996 the Trust recorded a gain of $563,000 on
the sale of the Littleton Bank Building and $13,000 on the sale of a .23 acre
parcel of land located in Dubuque, Iowa.
OTHER
The Trust is currently in the process of attempting to finalize negotiations
of an agreement in principle with a third party concerning a business proposal
as an alternative to the Plan of Liquidation. There can be no assurance that
the Trust will be successful in entering into such agreement in principle or
that the contemplated transaction will be completed.
-9-
38
P A R T I I
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
There are no items or events requiring reporting with respect to this
item.
Item 2. Changes in Securities
There are no items or events requiring reporting with respect to this
item.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
There are no items or events requiring reporting with respect to this
item.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There are no items or events requiring reporting with respect to this
item.
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibit 27: Financial Data Schedule
(b) There were no Reports on Form 8-K filed during the quarter for
which this report is filed.
-10-
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
(Registrant)
Date: February 14, 1997 By: /s/ John C. Kikol
------------------------------
John C. Kikol, Chairman and
President
Date: February 14, 1997 By: /s/ Michael R. Thoms
-----------------------------
Michael R. Thoms, Vice President
and Treasurer
-11-
40
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
EXHIBIT INDEX
"Assigned"
Exhibit No. Description Page No.
- - ----------- ----------- --------
(27) Financial Data 13
-12-
41
[ARTICLE] 5
[LEGEND] THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
[MULTIPLIER] 1,000
[PERIOD-TYPE] 3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END] SEP-30-1997
[PERIOD-START] OCT-01-1996
[PERIOD-END] DEC-31-1996
[CASH] 1,082
[SECURITIES] 0
[RECEIVABLES] 453
[ALLOWANCES] 3,307
[INVENTORY] 0
[CURRENT-ASSETS] 946
[PP&E] 40,800
[DEPRECIATION] 0
[TOTAL-ASSETS] 39,974
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES] 2,273
[BONDS] 14,301
[COMMON] 5,137
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY] 0
[PREFERRED] 0
[OTHER-SE] 18,257
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY] 39,974
[SALES] 0
[TOTAL-REVENUES] 2,514
[CGS] 0
[TOTAL-COSTS] 1,106
[OTHER-EXPENSES] 536
[LOSS-PROVISION] 0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE] 352
[INCOME-PRETAX] 520
[INCOME-TAX] 0
[INCOME-CONTINUING] 520
[DISCONTINUED] 0
[EXTRAORDINARY] 576
[CHANGES] 0
[NET-INCOME] 1,096
[EPS-PRIMARY] .21
[EPS-DILUTED] .21
42
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996
Commission File Number 0-5641
------
CleveTrust Realty Investors
---------------------------
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts 34-1085584
------------- ----------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
2001 Crocker Road, Suite 400, Westlake, Ohio 44145
- - --------------------------------------------- ------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (216) 899-0909
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Shares of Beneficial Interest, $1.00 Par Value
----------------------------------------------
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X . No .
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. X .
---
At December 2, 1996, 5,136,616 Shares of Beneficial Interest, par value $1.00
per Share, were outstanding, and the aggregate market value of the Shares of the
Registrant held by non-affiliates (based upon the closing price of the
Registrant's Shares on December 2, 1996, which was $4.875) was approximately
$7,128,000. For purposes of this information, the outstanding Shares
beneficially owned by all Trustees and Officers of the Registrant, were deemed
to be the shares held by affiliates.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the CleveTrust Realty Investors Proxy Statement for the 1996 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders (the "Proxy Statement") are incorporated by reference
into Part III of this report. With the exception of those portions which are
expressly incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K, the
documents incorporated by reference are not deemed filed as part of this report.
43
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
Year Ended September 30, 1996
FORM 10-K/A
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This Form 10-K/A is filed to amend the following portions of the CleveTrust
Realty Investors Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1996:
1. PART I - Item 1 - Business - Portfolio - paragraph one on page 1.
2. PART II - Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations - paragraph one on page 25.
3. PART III Items 10 (Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant), 11
(Executive Compensation), and 12 (Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management) - pages 32 - 38 - Full text inserted instead of
incorporated by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement.
4. PART III - Item 13 - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions - page
32 changed to read None.
5. PART IV - Item 14(a)(1) and (2) - Notes To Financial Statements - NOTE A
- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Real Estate - paragraph one
changed on page F-7.
44
PART I
------
Item 1. Business.
- - ------- ---------
General:
- - -------
CleveTrust Realty Investors (the "Trust") is a business trust organized in
Massachusetts which commenced operations in 1971. The Trust's assets are
composed principally of investments in real estate. The Trust directly manages
all of its improved properties. At September 30, 1996 the Trust had 19 full-time
employees.
On September 24, 1996 the Board of Trustees of the Trust unanimously voted to
recommend a Plan for the Orderly Liquidation of the Trust (the "Plan"). The
Plan, as proposed, would involve the sale of the Trust's properties during a
period of approximately three years. The Trustees will also consider proposals
for a merger, combination or sale of all or a portion of its properties in a
single transaction. The Plan will be submitted for approval by the Shareholders
of the Trust at the Annual Meeting to be held in February, 1997. The Trustees,
who in the aggregate own more than 70 percent of the outstanding shares of the
Trust, have agreed to vote their shares in favor of the Plan.
Portfolio:
- - ---------
At September 30, 1996, the Trust's investment portfolio consisted primarily of
ownership interests in eight multi-tenanted office buildings, four
multi-tenanted shopping centers, and one retail center (collectively, the
"Properties"). Based on the above referenced announcement of the Plan, the Trust
has classified all of its Properties as "Properties held for sale" at September
30, 1996, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be
Disposed of" ("SFAS No. 121"). The Trust made a review of the carrying value of
all the Properties at September 30, 1996 and determined that four of the Trust's
Properties had a carrying value higher than the estimated fair value, less cost
to sell. Therefore a valuation reserve of $3,307,000 was established. In
determining the estimated fair value, less cost to sell, the Trust applied an
estimated capitalization rate to the individual properties' cash flow. The Trust
did not deem it necessary to obtain appraisals of any of its properties. See
Item 2 of Part I for allocation of the valuation reserve. The significant
investment portfolio activity of the last three fiscal years is discussed under
Item 7 of Part II below. Information pertaining to the operating revenues,
operating income or loss and total assets of the Trust for each of the last
three fiscal years is provided under Item 6 of Part II below.
The Trust's primary business objective will be to sell the Trust's assets for
the highest possible price. The proceeds from these sales will be distributed to
the Shareholders after establishment of reserves, determined by Management of
the Trust which should be adequate so as to satisfy outstanding obligations of
the Trust. In order to sell the properties for the highest prices the Trust has
reviewed its operating strategy and implemented one that is intended to achieve
the Trust's business objective. One focus of this operating strategy is to
maximize funds from operations from each of the Trust's Properties, thereby
enhancing their value, through (i) rental rate increases, to the extent that
competitive conditions permit; (ii) improvements in tenant retention; (iii)
emphasis on expense controls consistent with the proper maintenance of the
Properties; and (iv) strategic capital investments in order to increase the
competitive position of the Properties. The Trust also believes that funds from
operations from its investments may increase as a result of cyclical market
recoveries and growth. The Trust strives to maintain operating expenses at its
Properties at the lowest practical levels given the need to adequately operate
and maintain its Properties, the majority of which were constructed in the
mid-1970's to mid-1980's. Maintenance is emphasized because it is considered
critical to the appreciation of the Properties.
-1-
45
PART I
------
Item: 1. Business (continued):
- - ------- ---------------------
The second focus of the Trust's operating strategy will be to find buyers for
the properties. The Trust has contacted and will continue to contact certain
principals to see if a direct sale can be initiated. If the Trust is unable to
find buyers by itself, then the trust will engage licensed real estate agents to
seek buyers on behalf of the Trust. The Trust has established targeted sales
prices for each of the Properties and will make every attempt to achieve or
exceed these prices during the liquidation period. However, no assurances may be
given that any or all of the Properties will be sold for the targeted prices
established by the Trust or will be sold at all.
On October 7, 1996 the Trust completed a $2,450,000 sale of the Littleton Bank
Building located in Littleton, Colorado. The sale resulted in a gain of
approximately $563,000 which will be reported in the first quarter of fiscal
year 1997. Additionally, the Trust currently has four of its properties under
contracts of sale. The Englewood Bank Building located in Englewood, Colorado is
under a contract of sale for a sales price of $5,350,000. The Executive Club
Building located in Denver, Colorado is under a contract of sale for $5,300,000.
The Spring Village Shopping Center located in Davenport, Iowa is under a
contract of sale for a sales price of $5,350,000. The Warren Plaza Shopping
Center located in Dubuque, Iowa is under a contract of sale for a sales price of
$5,950,000. All four of these contracts provide for "due diligence" periods,
during which time the buyer could cancel the contract at his option. After the
completion of the due diligence period the buyer will place a non-refundable
deposit with the Trust. Should the buyers fail to complete the sale these
deposits would be forfeited and retained by the Trust. However, no assurance may
be given that these properties will actually be sold at the prices stated. Also,
the Trust has signed letters of intent with various buyers for the sale of three
additional properties. The total gross sales prices for these three properties
is $15,640,000. Letters of intent are only agreements in principle on the most
fundamental terms and the parties do not intend that there be any binding
obligation to buy or sell the property until such time as a contract of sale is
executed by both the buyer and the Trust. In all cases, the sales prices exceed
the carrying value or the net book value of the properties.
The Trust's portfolio of Properties has generated sufficient revenue to cover
all operating expenses (excluding depreciation, a non-cash expense and in 1996
the provision for valuation reserve, also a non-cash expense), amortization of
mortgage notes payable, required amortization of bank notes payable, and capital
improvements to existing properties.
Financing and Leverage:
- - -----------------------
The Trust used borrowed funds in purchasing certain properties which the Trust
believes has helped to improve the Trust's return on investment in these
properties. At September 30, 1996 two of the Trust's investments were leveraged
with long-term non-recourse individual mortgage financing and one property was
leveraged with a $2,612,000 loan of which the first $750,000 is recourse and the
balance is non-recourse. At September 30, 1996 six of the Trust's remaining
improved properties served as collateral for the Trust's bank notes payable. See
Note F of the Notes to the Financial Statements presented in Part II, Item 8 of
this report.
Effective November 30, 1994 the Trust and two banks, National City Bank of
Cleveland ("NCB") and Manufacturer's and Traders Trust Company of Buffalo ("M &
T") signed a revolving line of credit agreement for up to $25,000,000 (but
limited by the value of the collateral provided). Of this amount a maximum of
$15,000,000 is currently available and $10,000,000 will be available at the
Trust's discretion upon payment of an activation fee of 3/4 of 1% on the
$10,000,000. This loan was for an initial term of three years. The banks review
the loan annually, and if satisfied, they extend the loan for an additional year
at that time. During 1996 the banks extended the maturity date to March 1, 1999.
Therefore, the Trust will
-2-
46
PART I
------
Item 1. Business (continued):
- - ------- ---------------------
have an annually renewed three year loan or two years in which to replace the
loan. At the Trust's option interest on any loan will be at any of the following
rates (i) the prime lending rate plus 1/4 of 1%; (ii) 250 basis points over the
LIBOR rate; or (iii) NCB's fixed rate of interest in effect from time to time.
Real Estate Market Conditions:
- - -----------------------------
Investments in real estate equities tend to be long term investments, and
accordingly, tend to limit the ability of the Trust to vary its portfolio of
real estate owned promptly in response to changing economic, financial and
investment conditions, such as overbuilding in certain markets and the resulting
intense competition for tenants. Although the Trust requires leases from all
tenants occupying space in its properties, in the event of a default by a
tenant, the Trust may modify the lease terms or evict the tenant. Tenant
evictions result in increased expenses and the possibility of lost rents until
the space is re-leased.
The tenant occupying the largest amount of space in any of the Trust's
Properties currently pays rent totaling $974,000 or 9.2% of the Trust's 1996
total revenues. This tenant has a lease which matures September 30, 2005 but the
lease contains six 10-year option provisions at the tenant's discretion which,
if exercised, would extend the maturity date to September 30, 2065. The rent
paid by this tenant is subject to an annual adjustment based on the increase or
decrease in operating expenses of the property.
The Trust, in order to remain competitive, leases space at its properties at
rates which are dictated by the market in which the property exists. The market
rates, which are quoted to both new tenants and tenants who are renewing their
leases, were at their highest levels in the early 1980's. These rates began to
decline at most of the properties in 1984 and continued to decline through 1988.
At that time, the market rates at all of the Trust's properties were at their
lowest levels. Since 1989, the market rates have tended to increase. In 1996 the
market rates at the majority of the properties were higher than those in 1988
but have not returned to the high rates that existed in 1983. The Trust is
encouraged by the current trends in rates. Additionally, the majority of leases
at the Properties include provisions for the tenant to pay additional rent if
operating expenses of the property increase.
Taxes:
- - -----
Through fiscal 1992 the Trust qualified as a real estate investment trust (a
"REIT") as defined by Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the "Code"). Effective April 1, 1993 the Trust automatically
failed to qualify as a REIT under the Code as on such date more than 50% in
value of the Trust's shares (after the application of certain constructive
ownership rules) were owned by five or fewer individuals.
Although the Trustees had the right pursuant to Section 8.5 of the Declaration
of Trust to prevent the transfer, and/or call for the redemption of, securities
of the Trust sufficient in the opinion of the Trustees to meet requirements for
REIT status, the Trustees in their discretion determined that maximizing
proceeds from the December 1992 rights offering (the "1992 Rights Offering")
outweighed the benefits of REIT status. The primary impact on the Trust as a
result of the failure to qualify as a REIT was that the Trust is now required to
file its federal and state income tax returns as a corporation and is subject to
taxation as a corporation. As a result, distributions to shareholders are
subject to double taxation to the extent of current and accumulated earnings and
profits of the Trust. The Trust will not be able to re-qualify as a REIT until
fiscal year 1998. At September 30, 1996 the Trust has net operating and capital
loss carryforwards (NOL's) of approximately $10.2 million available to offset
taxable income. In future years, the Trust can use approximately $298,000 per
year of NOL's, plus it can apply gains on the sales of properties ("built in
-3-
47
PART I
------
Item 1. Business (continued):
- - ------ --------------------
gains") for those properties which were owned by the Trust on December 28, 1992,
plus any prior year's unused portion (limited by carryforward periods) for NOL's
generated prior to December, 28, 1992. The Trust can also use NOL carryforwards
generated after December 28, 1992. These carryforwards of approximately $9.5
million expire through 2011. The balance of the carryforwards of $700,000 may be
recognized for a period through fiscal 1998 against built in gains, if any, to
the extent that fair market values of these properties exceeded their tax bases
as of December 28, 1992.
Once the Plan is approved, distributions to shareholders will be considered
liquidating distributions and reported as return of capital to shareholders to
the extent of the individual shareholders basis in their shares. Shareholders
are encouraged to consult their tax advisors for information concerning these
distributions.
Competition and Limited Resources:
- - ---------------------------------
The Trust's Properties are subject to competition from similar types of
properties in the vicinities in which they are located. Additionally, the Trust
is relatively small in comparison to many of its competitors. This size limits
the Trust's resources and may limit its ability to compete effectively in the
geographic markets in which the Trust owns property. However, since the Trust's
objective is to sell its properties, the Trust will concentrate its efforts on
being able to satisfy the requirements of prospective tenants so that they lease
space in the Trust's Properties rather than the competitors'.
-4-
48
PART I
------
Item 2. Properties.
- - ------ ----------
General:
- - -------
At September 30, 1996 the Trust had total invested assets of $39,015,000. The
invested assets included $38,896,000 of properties held for sale and $119,000 of
real estate mortgage loans.
The Trust's $38,896,000 of properties held for sale at September 30, 1996
included the following: eight office buildings with a carrying value of
$20,304,000; five commercial properties with a carrying value of $18,552,000;
and one investment in land with a carrying value of $40,000. Carrying value
represents amounts included in the Trust's Statement of Financial Condition at
September 30, 1996 after depreciation and the valuation reserve. On September
24, 1996 the Trustees of the Trust announced that they unanimously voted to
recommend a Plan for the Orderly Liquidation (the "Plan") of the Trust. Since
the Trust had previously adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
121 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed of" ("SFAS No. 121") the Trust, effective September 30, 1996,
classified all real estate owned as "Properties held for sale." A review of the
properties at September 30, 1996 determined that four properties required a
valuation reserve, as the market values, less cost to sell, of these properties
were less than their carrying value. Therefore a valuation reserve of $3,307,000
was established. In determining the estimated net sales prices the Trust applied
an estimated capitalization rate to the individual properties' cash flow. The
Trust did not deem it necessary to obtain appraisals of any of its properties.
Management will from time to time undertake a major renovation of a Property in
order to keep it competitive within its market. Currently, the Cannon West
Shopping Center located in Austin, Texas is having a trench drain installed at a
cost of approximately $150,000. This work is being done in order to combat a
sub-soil problem at the property. Management believes that the installation of
this trench drain will alleviate the problem. The cost of this work will be
reported in the first two quarters of fiscal year 1997. Additionally, Management
is reviewing plans for the installation of new store fronts at Tiffany Plaza, a
shopping center located in Ardmore, Oklahoma. The current estimated cost of this
work is $250,000. If the Trust proceeds with this work it should begin in the
spring of 1997.
In the opinion of Management, all Properties in the Trust's portfolio are
adequately covered by insurance. Additionally, Management believes all
properties are suitable and adequate for their intended use.
The amount of leverage varies among the Properties which the Trust owns. At
September 30, 1996 two of the Trust's Properties were leveraged with long-term
non-recourse individual mortgage financing and one property was leveraged with a
$2,612,000 loan of which the first $750,000 is recourse and the balance is
non-recourse. Additionally, as of September 30, 1996 six of the Trust's
remaining investments serve as collateral for the Trust's bank notes payable.
At September 30, 1996 the Trust owned two real estate mortgage loans with a
total balance of $119,000. Both loans are purchase money mortgages received by
the Trust in connection with sales of vacant land in Akron, Ohio. The first was
a $290,000 loan received in connection with the $834,000 March, 1994 sale of 70
acres. The second was a $212,000 loan received in connection with the $212,000
May, 1994 sale of 17.7697 acres.
-5-
49
PART I
------
Item 2. Properties (Continued):
- - ------------------------------
Properties Held for Sale:
- - ------------------------
The following table analyzes the properties held for sale at September 30, 1996
by type of property.
Percentage
Year Leased Square Total Accumulated Valuation Mortgage
Description Acquired (A) (B) Footage Cost Depreciation Reserve Debt
- - -------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE BUILDINGS: (---------------in thousands----------------------)
Colorado:
Englewood Bank Bldg. - Englewood (C)(E) 1971 97% 129,000 $6,103 $3,108 $0 $0
Executive Club Bldg. - Denver (F) 1972 73 96,000 4,623 2,966 0 0
Littleton Bank Bldg. - Littleton (D) 1973 99 58,000 3,166 1,398 0 1,209
Oklahoma:
Petroleum Club Bldg. - Tulsa (G) 1972 82 115,000 6,959 4,408 551 0
Texas:
Walnut Stemmons O. P. - Dallas (H) 1975 71 60,000 2,452 1,792 0 0
Office Alpha - Dallas (I) 1983 90 103,000 11,048 3,502 2,546 0
14800 Quorum Bldg. - Dallas (J) 1994 92 104,000 4,312 272 0 2,612
Brookside Office Bldg. - Arlington(K) 1996 100 44,000 2,208 24 0 0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL OFFICE BUILDINGS: 88 709,000 40,871 17,470 3,097 3,821
COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES:
South Carolina:
Triangle Square - Hilton Head (L) 1976 87 93,000 1,911 1,104 0 0
Texas:
Cannon West - Austin (M) 1987 95 123,000 8,225 2,174 0 5,742
Iowa:
Spring Village - Davenport (N) 1987 99 103,000 5,579 1,078 0 0
Warren Plaza - Dubuque (O) 1987 98 90,000 5,367 1,174 0 0
Oklahoma:
Tiffany Plaza - Ardmore (P) 1989 98 147,000 4,081 948 133 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES: 96 556,000 25,163 6,478 133 5,742
LAND:
Ohio:
Vacant land - Akron 1975 N/A N/A 117 N/A 77 0
-----------------------------------------------
TOTAL PROPERTIES HELD FOR SALE $66,151 $23,948 $3,307 $9,563
===============================================
-6-
50
PART I
------
Item 2. Properties (Continued):
- - ------ ----------------------
Investments in Real Estate: (Continued):
- - ----------------------------------------
(A) At September 30, 1996 the Trust had 338 tenants under lease in its office
buildings (excluding the Littleton Bank Bldg., Littleton Colorado which was
sold October 7, 1996), and its commercial properties, all of which are
shopping centers, with Triangle Square also having mini-warehouse
facilities behind the retail area (excluding the mini warehouses at
Triangle Square). These tenants are under leases of one year or more.
Additionally, the Trust had 215 month-to-month leases for mini-warehouse
spaces at Triangle Square.
(B) The following lists individually those tenants who occupy 10,000 square
feet or more, and whose original lease terms expire five years or more from
September 30, 1996. Seventeen (17) other tenants occupy less than 10,000
square feet and have leases which expire in five years or more from
September 30, 1996. These are grouped together and shown as "Others" on the
table below:
Expiration Square Annual
Property Tenant Date Footage Base Rent
--------- ---------------- ---------- ------- -----------
Englewood Bank Bank One, Denver 9/30/2005 108,000 $974,000
Petroleum Club Petroleum Club 4/30/2003 25,000 157,000
Cannon West Premiere Lady's Fit 8/31/2001 15,000 68,000
Cannon West H. E. Butt 10/05/2001 50,000 250,000*
Spring Village Eagle Foods 6/30/2005 46,000 204,000*
Spring Village Bombay Rest 1/31/2011 10,000 98,000*
Spring Village Walgreens 11/30/2010 11,000 67,000*
Spring Village I. H. Miss 11/30/2011 10,000 34,000
Warren Plaza HY-VEE 9/08/2013 52,000 256,000*
Tiffany Plaza Orscheln Farm 8/31/2001 30,000 102,000
Tiffany Plaza Fleming Companies 3/20/2001 42,000 87,000*
Tiffany Plaza C. R. Anthony 3/07/2001 24,000 69,000*
14800 Quorum Preston 3/21/2002 13,000 131,000
Brookside Schrickel, Rollins 8/31/2003 15,000 169,000
Various Others Various 45,000 460,000*
------- ----------
496,000 $3,126,000
======= ==========
<FN>
* Leases marked with an asterisk have additional rent provisions to be paid
based on a percentage of the gross sales over a base sales figure.
All leases listed on the table are subject to an annual adjustment in rent
based on the increase or decrease in the operating expenses of the
Property.
The annual base rents of the tenants listed in the table equal 30% of the
total 1996 rental income, and these tenants occupy 496,000 square feet
(45%) of the total 1,100,000 square feet (excluding the Littleton Bank
Bldg. which was sold October 7, 1996) currently occupied. The remaining
604,000 square feet are occupied by 307 tenants. These tenants' leases
expire during the next five years. The loss of rentals from any one of
these leases, if the Trust would not be able to renew or replace, would not
have a significant effect on the Trust's operations.
(C) The following is the only tenant who occupies 50% or more of a Property:
Englewood Bank Building -- Bank One, Denver -- 108,000 sq. ft. (84%).
-7-
51
PART I
------
Item 2. Properties (Continued):
- - ------ ----------------------
Investments in Real Estate: (Continued):
- - ----------------------------------------
(D) The Littleton Bank Building was sold on October 7, 1996. The sale resulted
in a gain of approximately $563,000 which will be reported in the first
quarter of Fiscal Year 1997.
(E) ENGLEWOOD BANK BUILDING. The Englewood Bank Building is located in
Englewood, Colorado. The building contains 10 stories and is suitable and
adequate for its use as a bank and office building.
The main tenant is Bank One, Denver which occupies 84% of the building. The
balance of the building is primarily leased to small service or
professional organizations for use as general offices. The Trust's policy
is to sign leases of three to five years in order to take advantage of
changes in the market.
The Trust has been notified by the City of Englewood that the City has
recently passed a law that would require the Trust to install a sprinkler
system and fire pull stations on every floor of this property. The law
requires that this work be done over a five (5) year period starting in
1997. The Trust is currently reviewing all of its options relating to this
required work. At this time the Trust does not have any estimates as to the
costs that would be involved in undertaking this work. Other than this
required work there are no other significant renovations planned for this
property beyond normal maintenance and repairs and tenant improvements done
in conjunction with the leasing of space.
The Englewood Bank Building is subject to limited direct competition from
comparable office projects in the general vicinity. There is only one
competing high-rise office building in the area of similar size, quality,
condition and location to the Englewood Bank Building. Other competing
projects consist of low-rise office buildings and converted retail space
generally considered to be of lesser quality.
The occupancy rates for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1992 through
1996 were as follows: 89% in 1992, 91% in 1993, 98% in 1994, 97% in 1995
and 1996 . The Property's average rental rate per occupied square foot for
the same period was $6.65 in 1992, $6.69 in 1993, $6.80 in 1994, $6.63 in
1995, and $6.67 in 1996.
Bank One, Denver is the only tenant occupying over 10% of the rentable
space. Its annual rent is currently $974,000 but is subject to an annual
adjustment based on increases or decreases in property expenses. This lease
expires September 30, 2005 and has six ten-year renewal options available.
Based upon leases in place at September 30, 1996 lease expirations for the
next ten fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 are as follows:
Number Total Percent of Gross
of Leases Sq. Ft. Annual Base Annual Base Rents
Year Expiring Expiring Rents Expiring at 9/30/96
---- --------- -------- -------------- -----------------
1997 5 7,738 $ 79,356 7%
1998 2 1,826 19,824 2
1999 3 8,051 77,892 7
2000 -2004 NONE
2005 1 107,663 973,690 84
2006 NONE
-8-
52
PART I
Item 2 Properties (Continued):
- - ------- ----------------------
Investments in Real Estate: (Continued)
- - ---------------------------------------
The Englewood Bank Building is depreciated for tax purposes using the
straight line method over 40 years for the building and improvements. The
depreciable tax basis was $1,896,000 at September 30, 1996. The 1995 real
estate taxes for the Property were $107,539 based on a millage rate of
$8.252 per $1,000 of assessed value. The 1996 real estate taxes are not yet
known.
(F) EXECUTIVE CLUB BUILDING. The Executive Club Building is located in Denver,
Colorado. The building contains eleven floors and has a health club, which
includes a swimming pool, located in the basement. The building is suitable
and adequate for its use as an office building.
Space in the building is leased to service and professional organizations
for use as general offices. The Trust's policy is to sign new leases with
new and renewal tenants for periods of three to five years in order to take
advantage of changes in the market.
Presently, the Trust has no plans for any significant renovations of the
property beyond normal maintenance and repairs and tenant improvements done
in conjunction with the leasing of space within the Property.
There are numerous office buildings in the direct vicinity, some of higher
quality, and numerous projects of similar age, condition and quality that
directly compete with the Executive Club Building. The Trust believes that
the advantage that this building has is that the building caters to small
tenant users, while the majority of the properties in the area prefer
larger tenants.
Occupancy for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1992 through 1996 was as
follows: 92% in 1992; 97% in 1993 and 1994; 93% in 1995 and 73% in 1996.
The Property's average rental rates per occupied square foot for the same
periods were: $9.69 in 1992; $9.55 in 1993; $10.15 in 1994; $11.63 in 1995
and $11.78 in 1996.
There are no tenants in this property occupying 10% or more of the space.
Based upon leases in place as of September 30, 1996 lease expirations for
the next ten fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 are as follows:
Number Total Percent of Gross
of Leases Sq. Ft. Annual Base Annual Base
Year Expiring Expiring Rents Expiring Rents at 9/30/95
- - ---- --------- -------- -------------- -----------------
1997 32 33,353 $392,920 42%
1998 20 21,688 253,392 27
1999 14 20,722 247,224 26
2000 1 1,282 15,120 2
2001 NONE
2002 1 2,169 27,108 3
2003-2006 NONE
-9-
53
PART I
------
Item 2. Properties (Continued):
- - ------- ----------------------
Investments in Real Estate: (Continued)
- - ----------------------------------------
The Executive Club Building is depreciated for tax purposes using the
straight line method with the building and improvements having a 40 year
life. The depreciable tax basis was $1,862,000 at September 30, 1996. The
1995 real estate taxes for the Property were $79,693 based on a millage
rate of $8.1161 per $1,000 of assessed value. The 1996 real estate taxes
are not yet known.
(G) PETROLEUM CLUB BUILDING. The Petroleum Club Building is located in Tulsa,
Oklahoma. The building contains sixteen floors with an attached four level
parking garage which is leased out to American Parking for an annual rent
plus a percentage rent determined at the end of each year and offers valet,
self parking both covered and uncovered. The building is suitable and
adequate for its use as an office building.
The main tenant is The Petroleum Club which occupies the top four floors.
The balance of the building is leased to service and professional
organizations for use as general offices. The Trust's policy is to sign new
leases with new and renewal tenants for periods of three to five years in
order to take advantage of changes in the market.
Presently, the Trust has no plans for any significant renovations of the
property beyond normal maintenance and repairs and tenant improvements done
in conjunction with the leasing of space within the Property.
This property is located in the downtown area of Tulsa and, as such, there
are numerous office buildings in the direct vicinity, some of higher
quality, and numerous projects of similar age, condition and quality that
directly compete with the Petroleum Club Building. The floor size of this
property is only 7,800 square feet and as such the Trust can offer small
tenants a substantial portion of a floor without the tenant competing with
larger tenants who usually dominate downtown office space. Despite the
stagnate economy of Tulsa, which depends primarily on the oil and gas
industry, the Trust has made strides in recent years in increasing the
occupancy of this property. One recent benefit has been the Petroleum Clubs
willingness to open its membership to others outside of the petroleum
industry. The majority of the tenants in the building now belong to the
Club.
Occupancy for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1992 through 1996 was as
follows: 75% in 1992; 72% in 1993; 78% in 1994; 81% in 1995; and 82% in
1996. The property's average rental rates per occupied square foot for the
same periods were: $8.47 in 1992; $8.69 in 1993; $7.84 in 1994; $8.22 in
1995; and $8.84 in 1996.
There are no tenants in this property occupying 10% or more of the space.
-10-
54
PART I
------
Item 2. Properties (Continued):
- - ------- ----------------------
Investments in Real Estate: (Continued)
- - ----------------------------------------
Based upon leases in place as of September 30, 1996 lease expirations for
the next ten fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 are as follows:
Number Total Percent of Gross
of Leases Sq. Ft. Annual Base Annual Base
Year Expiring Expiring Rents Expiring Rents at 9/30/95
- - ---- -------- -------- -------------- -----------------
1997 17 36,054 $366,996 40%
1998 3 6,346 132,444(i) 14
1999 7 24,255 223,872 24
2000 NONE
2001 1 5,741 47,364 5
2002 NONE
2003 1 24,579 155,040 17
2004-2006 NONE
<FN>
(i) Includes $69,780 for American Parking who leases the garage. Their
lease expires March 31, 1998. There is no square footage included for this
tenant.
The Petroleum Club Building is depreciated for tax purposes using the
straight line method with the building and improvements having a 40 year
life. The depreciable tax basis was $2,618,000 at September 30, 1996. The
1995 real estate taxes for the Property were $27,558 based on a millage
rate of $10.021 per $1,000 of assessed value. The 1996 real estate taxes
are not yet known.
(H) WALNUT STEMMONS OFFICE PARK. Walnut Stemmons Office Park is located in
Dallas, Texas. The complex is currently composed of three single story
buildings. This property originally was composed of nine single story
buildings. Four of the buildings were sold in November, 1992. Two more
buildings were sold September 30, 1996. All six buildings were sold to the
same buyer. The remaining three buildings all have exterior entrances for
the tenants, with no common areas.
Space in the buildings is leased to small businesses, the majority of which
are just commencing operations. The Trust's policy is to sign three to five
year leases with both new and renewal tenants with the tenant being
responsible for all services within their space, such as, electricity and
cleaning.
Presently, the Trust has no plans for any significant renovations of the
property beyond normal maintenance and repairs and tenant improvements done
in conjunction with the leasing of space within the Property.
There are similar properties in the immediate area of this Property. The
surrounding area features restaurants, a bowling alley, and a chiropractic
college. Since this property is primarily leased to first time businesses,
there is significant turnover. The Trust believes that these three
buildings will be purchased by the same buyer who purchased the other six
buildings.
Occupancy for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1992 through 1996 was as
follows: 73% in 1992; 97% in 1993; 86% in 1994; 79% in 1995; and 71% in
1996. The Property's average rental rates per occupied square foot for the
same periods were: $5.09 in 1992; $4.62 in 1993; $5.11 in 1994; $5.34 in
1995; and $5.38 in 1996.
-11-
55
PART I
------
Item 2. Properties (Continued):
- - ------ ----------------------
Investments in Real Estate: (Continued)
- - ---------------------------------------
There are no tenants in this property occupying 10% of more of the space.
Based upon leases in place at September 30, 1996 lease expirations for the
next ten fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 are as follows:
Number Total Percent of Gross
of Leases Sq. Ft. Annual Base Annual Base
Year Expiring Expiring Rents Expiring Rents at 9/30/96
---- -------- -------- -------------- ----------------
1997 10 15,443 $74,772 33%
1998 5 7,105 41,772 18
1999 5 11,426 66,576 29
2000 2 8,531 32,004 14
2001 1 1,875 11,244 6
2002-2006 NONE
Walnut Stemmons Office Park is depreciated for tax purposes using the
straight line method with the building and improvements having a 40 year
life. The depreciable tax basis was $643,000 at September 30, 1996. The
1995 real estate taxes for the Property were $53,755 based on a millage
rate of $2.56 per $100 of assessed value. The 1996 real estate taxes are
not yet known.
(I) OFFICE ALPHA. Office Alpha is located in the North-Dallas LBJ-East office
market of Dallas, Texas. Office Alpha contains five stories and is suitable
and adequate for its use as an office building.
Space in the building is leased to service and professional organizations
for use as general offices. The Trust's policy is to sign leases with new
and renewal tenants for periods of three to five years in order to take
advantage of changes in the market.
Presently, the Trust has no plans for any significant renovations of the
Property beyond normal maintenance and repairs and tenant improvements done
in conjunction with the leasing of space within the Property.
There are numerous office buildings in the direct vicinity, some of higher
quality, and numerous projects of similar age, style, condition and quality
that directly compete with Office Alpha. Leasing proposals for both new and
renewal tenants in this submarket are highly competitive. Many of the
Trust's competitors in this submarket have substantially greater capital
and resources than the Trust.
Occupancy for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1992 through 1996 was as
follows: 73% for 1992; 84% for 1993; 83% for 1994; 91% for 1995; and 90%
for 1996. The Property's average rental rates per occupied square foot for
the same period were: $9.61 in 1992; $8.91 in 1993; $9.00 in 1994; $9.52 in
1995; and $10.01 in 1996.
At September 30, 1996 Jewish Family Services of Dallas, Inc., a non-profit
organization which performs social services primarily for the Jewish
community in Dallas, was the only tenant occupying 10% or more of the space
in Office Alpha. This tenant's annual rent is $98,000. Its lease expires
September 30, 1999.
-12-
56
PART I
------
Item 2. Properties (Continued):
- - ------ ----------------------
Investments in Real Estate: (Continued)
- - ----------------------------------------
Based upon leases in place at September 30, 1996 lease expirations for the
next ten fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 are as follows:
Number Total Percent of Gross
of Leases Sq. Ft. Annual Base Annual Base
Year Expiring Expiring Rents Expiring Rents at 9/30/96
---- --------- -------- -------------- ----------------
1997 14 18,578 $197,532 20%
1998 12 23,823 248,424 25
1999 14 35,037 353,796 35
2000 5 14,241 156,852 16
2001 2 4,517 46,830 4
2002-2006 NONE
Office Alpha is depreciated for tax purposes using the straight line basis
with the building and improvements having a 15 year life. The depreciable
tax basis was $1,776,000 at September 30, 1996. The 1995 real estate taxes
for the Property were $82,636 based on a millage rate of $2.71 per $100 of
assessed value. The 1996 real estate taxes are not yet known.
(J) 14800 QUORUM BUILDING. 14800 Quorum Building is located in the
North-Dallas, Quorum office market of Dallas, Texas. 14800 Quorum contains
five stories and is suitable and adequate for its use as an office
building.
The Trust owns this Property in fee simple, subject to a first mortgage
loan, at a rate of 8.3%, which matures August 19, 2000. The loan is
non-recourse except the first $750,000. At September 30, 1996 the balance
of this loan was $2,612,000. By maturity $174,000 of scheduled amortization
payments are required and therefore a balance of $2,438,000 will be due at
maturity. There is a prepayment penalty of 2.0% if the loan is paid off
early.
Space in the building is leased to service and professional organizations
for use as general offices. The Trust's policy is to sign leases with new
and renewal tenants for periods of three to five years in order to take
advantage of changes in the market.
Presently, the Trust has no plans for any significant renovations of the
Property beyond normal maintenance and repairs and tenant improvements done
in conjunction with the leasing of space within the Property.
There are numerous office buildings in the direct vicinity, some of higher
quality, and numerous projects of similar age, style, condition and quality
that directly compete with 14800 Quorum. Leasing proposals for both new and
renewal tenants in this submarket are highly competitive. Many of the
Trust's competitors in this submarket have substantially greater capital
and resources than the Trust.
The Trust purchased the Property on August 26, 1994. The occupancy for the
two full fiscal years ended September 30, 1995 and 1996 that the Trust has
operated the Property was as follows: 90% in 1995 and 92% in 1996. The
Property's average rental rates per occupied square foot for the same two
years were as follows: $9.87 in 1995 and $11.02 in 1996.
-13-
57
PART I
Item 2. Properties (Continued):
- - ------ ----------------------
Investments in Real Estate: (Continued)
- - ----------------------------------------
At September 30, 1996 Preston Equities, Inc., who runs executive suites for
general office use, was the only tenant occupying 10% or more of the space
in 14800 Quorum. This tenant's annual rent is $131,108. Its lease expires
March 31, 2002.
Based upon leases in place at September 30, 1996 lease expirations for the
next ten fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 are as follows:
Number Total Percent of Gross
of Leases Sq. Ft. Annual Base Annual Base
Year Expiring Expiring Rents Expiring Rents at 9/30/96
---- -------- -------- -------------- ----------------
1997 9 20,538 $223,627 20%
1998 2 3,135 37,308 3
1999 9 29,517 358,764 32
2000 5 15,762 185,558 17
2001 5 12,973 158,628 14
2002 2 14,651 159,332 14
2003-2006 NONE
14800 Quorum is depreciated for tax purposes using the straight line basis
with the building and improvements having a 40 year life. The depreciable
tax basis was $3,772,000 at September 30, 1996. The 1995 real estate taxes
for the Property were $93,990 based on a millage rate of $2.41 per $100 of
assessed value. The 1996 real estate taxes are not yet known.
(K) BROOKSIDE OFFICE BUILDING. The Brookside Office Building is a three-story
brick office building located in Arlington, Texas. The Trust purchased the
Property on March 28, 1996. The Property is suitable and adequate for its
use as an office building.
Space in the building is leased to service and professional organizations
for use as general offices. The Property was 100% occupied at the time of
purchase and has remained such during the balance of the fiscal year. It is
the Trust's intention to sign new leases with any new and renewal tenants
for periods of three to five years in order to take advantage of changes in
the market. Several of the existing tenants have informed the Trust that
should any current tenant vacate its space they would like to expand their
space. The Trust will make every effort to accommodate these tenants should
the situation arise.
Presently, the Trust has no plans for any significant renovations of the
Property beyond normal maintenance and repairs and tenant improvements done
in conjunction with the leasing of space within the Property.
There are numerous office buildings in the direct vicinity, some of higher
quality, and numerous projects of similar age, style, condition and quality
that directly compete with the Brookside Office Building. As stated above,
with several tenants desiring to expand the Trust believes that the size of
the Property will be the only drawback in retaining tenants. Since the
Property is new to the Trust's portfolio it remains to be seen what other
competitive actions will be needed in the future to keep the Property at
100% occupied at a competitive rate.
The occupancy for the six months in the fiscal year ended September 30,
1996 that the Trust has owned the Property was 100%. The average rental
rate per occupied space for this same period was $11.69.
-14-
58
PART I
------
Item 2. Properties (Continued):
- - ------ -----------------------
Investments in Real Estate: (Continued)
- - ----------------------------------------
At September 30, 1996 two tenants occupied more than 10% of the Property.
The first was Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc. an architectural
firm. This tenant's annual rent is $168,660 and their lease expires August
31, 2003. the second tenant was Vestal-Loftis-Kalista, Architects, Inc., an
architectural firm. This tenant's annual rent is $64,000 and their lease
expires January 31, 2000.
Based upon leases in place at September 30, 1996 lease expirations for the
next ten fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 are as follows:
Number Total Percent of Gross
of Leases Sq. Ft. Annual Base Annual Base
Year Expiring Expiring Rents Expiring Rents at 9/30/96
---- --------- -------- -------------- -----------------
1997 4 6,836 $ 77,210 15%
1998 2 8,507 97,040 19
1999 3 7,862 96,975 19
2000 1 5,774 64,000 13
2001 NONE
2002 NONE
2003 1 14,607 168,660 34
2004-2006 NONE
Brookside Office Building is depreciated for tax purposes using the
straight line basis with the building and improvements having a 40 year
life. The depreciable tax basis was $1,884,000 at September 30, 1996. The
1995 real estate taxes for the Property were $48,730 based on a millage
rate of $2.55 per $100 of assessed value. The 1996 real estate taxes are
not yet known.
(L) TRIANGLE SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER. The Triangle Square Shopping Center is
composed of three one-story retail shopping center buildings and nine all
concrete block mini-warehouse buildings (including one two-story building)
located in Hilton Head, South Carolina. The main tenants of the three
retail buildings are service oriented businesses. The Property is suitable
and adequate for its use as a retail center and mini-warehouse facility.
The Trust has no plans for significant renovations of the Property beyond
normal maintenance and repairs and tenant improvements done in conjunction
with the leasing of space within the Property.
There are numerous shopping centers located in the direct vicinity, some of
higher quality, and numerous projects of similar age, condition and quality
of the Property. However, the majority of these centers are composed of
retail tenants, while Triangle Square's tenant are primarily service
oriented. There are no mini-warehouse facilities in the immediate area.
Occupancy of the combined project for the fiscal years ended September 30,
1992 through 1996 was as follows: 72% in 1992; 74% in 1993; 78% in 1994;
89% in 1995; and 88% in 1996. The average rental rate per occupied square
foot during the same period was $6.58 in 1992; $6.25 in 1993; $5.99 in
1994; $5.74 in 1995; and $6.55 in 1996.
There are no tenants in this property occupying 10% or more of the space.
All leases for storage space in the mini-warehouses are less than one year.
At September 30, 1996 there were 215 leases for 86,570 square feet at an
annual rental of $272,400 (44% of gross annual base
-15-
59
PART I
------
Item 2. Properties (Continued):
- - ------- ----------------------
Investments in Real Estate: (Continued)
- - ----------------------------------------
rents). Based upon leases in place as of September 30, 1996 in the three
retail buildings, lease expirations for the next ten fiscal years ended
September 30, 2006 are as follows:
Number Total Percent of Gross
of Leases Sq. Ft. Annual Base Annual Base
Year Expiring Expiring Rents Expiring Rents at 9/30/96
---- --------- -------- ------------- -----------------
1997 11 19,830 $189,132 31%
1998 4 4,543 45,396 7
1999 5 5,927 57,144 9
2000 2 2,886 29,805 5
2001-2003 NONE
2004 1 1,745 25,488 4
2005-2006 NONE
Triangle Square is depreciated for tax purposes using the straight line
method with the buildings and improvements having a 35 year life. The
depreciable tax basis was $723,000 at September 30, 1996. The 1995 real
estate taxes for the Property were $33,457.37 based on a millage rate of
$2.441 per $1,000 of assessed value. The 1996 real estate taxes are not yet
known.
(M) CANNON WEST SHOPPING CENTER. The Cannon West Shopping Center is a
grocery-anchored neighborhood strip center located in Austin, Texas. Cannon
West's main tenants operate retail businesses. The Property is suitable and
adequate for its use as a strip shopping center.
The Trust is currently installing a Trench Drain at a cost of approximately
$150,000 at the Property. This work is being done in order to combat a
sub-soil problem at the property. Other than this work, which is currently
under way, the Trust has no other plans for significant renovations of the
Property beyond normal maintenance and repairs and tenant improvements done
in conjunction with the leasing of space within the Property.
The Trust owns this Property in fee simple, subject to a first mortgage
loan, at a rate of 8.3%, which matures May 1, 2002. At September 30, 1996
the balance of this loan was $5,742,000. By maturity $1,231,000 of
scheduled amortization payments are required and therefore a balance of
$4,511,000 will be due at maturity.
The Cannon West Shopping Center is subject to a limited amount of direct
competition in its immediate trade area. Although there are a number of
grocery anchored shopping centers located in South Austin serving the
south-side communities that are located along William Cannon Drive -- a
major East-West highway serving the South Austin area -- Cannon West
Shopping Center is the only retail shopping center located at the
intersection of William Cannon Drive and Westgate Boulevard that serves
the immediate surrounding neighborhoods.
Occupancy for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1992 through 1996 was as
follows: 88% in 1992; 93% in 1993; 75% in 1994; 82% in 1995; and 95% in
1996. The average rental rate, including percentage rents, per occupied
square foot during the same period was $7.44 in 1992; $7.05 in 1993; $8.38
in 1994; $9.01 in 1995; and $9.39 in 1996.
-16-
60
PART I
Item 2. Properties (Continued):
- - ------- ----------------------
Investments in Real Estate: (Continued)
- - ----------------------------------------
Cannon West has two tenants that occupy more than 10% of the Property. The
first is H.E. Butt Grocery Store ("HEB"). Their annual base rent is
$250,000. The lease also calls for tax, insurance and maintenance
escalations and has a percentage rent clause. For 1996 the percentage rent
paid was $105,000. This lease expires October 5, 2001 and has four
five-year renewal options. In September, 1995 the Trust was notified by HEB
that they had purchased a parcel of land approximately one mile from Cannon
West. As of September 30, 1996 this land had not yet been rezoned for a
grocery store center, however, the Trust is of the understanding that HEB
is in the process of having this land rezoned. Should HEB build a store
and/or a shopping center on this parcel of land, it could effect Cannon
West. The second tenant is Premiere Lady's Fitness Center, a health club,
fitness center for women only. Their annual rent is $68,000. The lease also
calls for tax, insurance and maintenance escalations. This lease expires
August 31, 2001.
Based upon leases in place at September 30, 1996 lease expirations for the
ten fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 are as follows:
Number Total Percent of Gross
of Leases Sq. Ft. Annual Base Annual Base
Year Expiring Expiring Rents Expiring Rents at 9/30/96
---- --------- -------- -------------- ----------------
1997 9 13,899 $168,886 18%
1998 5 5,951 84,696 9
1999 5 6,220 70,356 8
2000 3 11,099 157,380 17
2001 4 19,818 140,291 15
2002 1 49,585 250,000 27
2003 1 2,373 54,620 6
2004 - 2006 NONE
The building and improvements are depreciated for tax purposes using the
straight line method over 18 years. The depreciable tax basis was
$3,624,000 at September 30, 1996. The 1995 real estate taxes were $153,100
based on a millage rate of $2.394 per $100 of assessed value. The 1996 real
estate taxes are not yet known.
(N) SPRING VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER. The Spring Village Shopping Center is a
grocery-anchored neighborhood strip center located in Davenport, Iowa.
Spring Village's main tenants operate retail businesses. The Property is
suitable and adequate for its use as a strip shopping center.
The Trust has no plans for significant renovations of the Property beyond
normal maintenance and repairs and tenant improvements done in conjunction
with the leasing of space within the Property.
The Spring Village Shopping Center is subject to direct competition in its
immediate trade area. There are several grocery anchored shopping centers
located on Kimberly Road, the major retail East-West road servicing
Davenport. At September 30, 1996 Spring Village was 99% occupied primarily
due to the attractiveness of the center's grocery store which was remodeled
and expanded in 1994 at the cost of the Store.
-17-
61
PART I
------
Item 2. Properties (Continued):
- - ------- ----------------------
Investments in Real Estate: (Continued)
- - ----------------------------------------
Occupancy for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1992 through 1996 was as
follows: 98% in 1992; 99% in 1993; 98% in 1994; 100% in 1995; and 99% in
1996. The average rental rate, including percentage rents, per occupied
square foot during the same period was $8.00 in 1992; $8.00 in 1993; $8.26
in 1994; $7.89 in 1995; and $8.58 in 1996.
Spring Village has two tenants that occupy more than 10% of the Property.
The first is Eagle Food Centers, whose annual base rent is $204,000. Their
lease also calls for tax, insurance and maintenance escalations and has a
percentage rent clause. There was no percentage rent due for 1996. This
lease expires June 30, 2005. The second is the Walgreen Company, which
operates a drug store, and pays annual base rent of $67,000. Its lease also
calls for tax, insurance and maintenance escalations. This lease expires
November 30, 2010.
Based upon leases in place at September 30, 1996 lease expirations for the
ten fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 are as follows:
Number Total Percent of Gross
of Leases Sq. Ft. Annual Base Annual Base
Year Expiring Expiring Rents Expiring Rents at 9/30/96
---- -------- -------- -------------- -----------------
1997 2 2,175 $ 26,016 4%
1998 2 4,200 47,136 7
1999 4 7,450 82,000 12
2000 3 10,825 136,535 20
2001 - 2004 NONE
2005 1 45,763 204,000 29
2006 NONE
The building and improvements are depreciated for tax purposes using the
straight line method over 31-1/2 years. The depreciable tax basis was
$3,292,000 at September 30, 1996. The 1996 real estate taxes are $148,234
based on a millage rate of $34.5287 per $1,000 of assessed value.
(O) WARREN PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER. The Warren Plaza Shopping Center is a
grocery-anchored neighborhood strip center located in Dubuque, Iowa. Warren
Plaza's main tenants operate retail businesses. The Property is suitable
and adequate for its use as a strip shopping center.
The Trust has no plans for significant renovations of the Property beyond
normal maintenance and repairs and tenant improvements done in conjunction
with the leasing of space within the Property.
In addition to the 90,000 square feet owned by the Trust, there is a 97,000
square foot Target discount store attached to the property, which is not
owned by the Trust. The Property is subject to direct competition in its
immediate trade area. There are several grocery anchored shopping centers
located on both Dodge Street and John F. Kennedy Blvd. (this Property is
located on the corner of these two streets). Across the street from the
Property is a mall, which the Trust does not consider competition.
Additionally, there is both a K-Mart and Wal-mart in the area which compete
with the Target store. For both 1994 and 1995 this Property was 100%
occupied, dropping to 98% for 1996. The Trust attributes this high
occupancy for the past two years to both the grocery store and the Target
Store. Both of these stores have been recently remodeled and expanded at
the cost of the stores.
-18-
62
PART I
------
Item 2. Properties (Continued):
- - ---------------------------------
Investments in Real Estate: (Continued)
- - ----------------------------------------
Occupancy for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1992 through 1996 was as
follows: 92% in 1992; 99% in 1993; 100% in 1994 and 1995; and 98% in 1996.
The average rental rate, including percentage rent, per occupied square
foot during the same period was $8.86 in 1992; $8.60 in 1993; $9.67 in
1994; $9.24 in 1995; and $9.17 in 1996.
Warren Plaza has one tenant that occupies more than 10% of the Property,
HY-VEE Food Store. Its annual base rent is $256,000. The lease also calls
for tax, insurance and maintenance escalations and has a percentage rent
clause. There was no percentage rent due for 1996. The lease expires June
30, 2013.
Based upon leases in place at September 30, 1996 lease expirations for the
ten fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 are as follows:
Number Total Percent of Gross
of Leases Sq. Ft. Annual Base Annual Base
Year Expiring Expiring Rents Expiring Rents at 9/30/96
---- -------- -------- -------------- -----------------
1997 2 3,900 $42,010 7%
1998 1 1,050 10,680 2
1999 4 5,500 61,644 10
2000 3 11,160 168,274 27
2001 2 8,500 57,624 9
2002 1 3,200 35,736 6
2003 NONE
2004 1 1,400 14,940 2
2005 - 2006 NONE
The building and improvements are depreciated for tax purposes using the
straight line method over 31-1/2 years. The depreciable tax basis was
$3,568,000 at September 30, 1996. The 1996 real estate taxes are $108,178
based on a millage rate of $30.85536 per $1,000 of assessed value.
(P) TIFFANY PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER. The Tiffany Plaza Shopping Center is a
grocery-anchored neighborhood strip center located in Ardmore, Oklahoma.
Tiffany Plaza's main tenants operate retail businesses. The Property is
suitable and adequate for its use as a strip shopping center.
The Trust is reviewing plans for the installation of new store fronts at
the Property. The Trust believes that the Property, which was constructed
in 1975, has begun to look old and that the new store fronts will give the
center a new look. The estimated cost of this work is $250,000. If the
Trust proceeds with this work it should begin in the spring of 1997. No
other renovation work beyond normal maintenance and repairs and tenant
improvements done in conjunction with the leasing of space within the
Property is planned.
The main competition for this center is a mall and a Wal-mart center, both
of which are located more than a mile away from Tiffany Plaza.
-19-
63
PART I
------
Item 2. Properties (Continued):
- - ------- ----------------------
Investments in Real Estate: (Continued)
- - ----------------------------------------
Occupancy for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1992 through 1996 was as
follows: 89% in 1992; 92% in 1993; 97% in 1994; 95% in 1995; and 98% in
1996. The average rental rate, including percentage rent, per occupied
square foot during the same period was: $4.10 in 1992; $4.05 in 1993; $3.59
in 1994; $3.66 in 1995; and $3.93 in 1996.
Tiffany plaza has three tenants who occupy more than 10% of the Property.
The first is Flemming Companies who operate a Buy-For-Less grocery store.
The annual rent is $86,625. The lease also calls for tax, insurance and
maintenance escalations and has a percentage rent clause. There was no
percentage rent due for 1996. The lease expires March 20, 2001. The second
tenant is Orscheln Farm and Home Supply, Inc., who sell farm equipment and
supplies. The annual rent is $102,000. The lease also calls for tax,
insurance and maintenance escalations. The lease expires August 31, 2001.
The third tenant is CR Anthony Company, a family clothing store. The annual
rent is $69,300. The lease also calls for tax, insurance and maintenance
escalations and has a percentage rent clause. There was no percentage rent
due for 1996. The lease expires March 7, 2001.
Based upon leases in place at September 30, 1996 lease expirations for the
ten fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 are as follows:
Number Total Percent of Gross
of Leases Sq. Ft. Annual Base Annual Base
Year Expiring Expiring Rents Expiring Rents at 9/30/96
---- --------- --------- -------------- -----------------
1997 6 12,774 $94,332 19%
1998 3 7,708 34,440 7
1999 4 10,986 57,624 12
2000 1 7,192 30,972 6
2001 4 100,551 258,000 53
2003 NONE
2004 1 5,108 14,928 3
2005 - 2006 NONE
The building and improvements are depreciated for tax purposes using the
straight line method over 31-1/2 years. The depreciable tax basis was
$2,609,000 at September 30, 1996. The 1995 real estate taxes are $32,304
based on a millage rate of $8.3681 per $100 of assessed value. The 1996
real estate taxes are not yet known.
-20-
64
PART I
------
Item 2. Properties (Continued):
- - ------ -----------------------
Geographic Distribution:
- - -----------------------
The Trust's properties are located in six states. The table below demonstrates
the geographic distribution of the Trust's properties at September 30, 1996:
Percentage of
Number of Percentage of Assets Based
Investments Rental Income on Cost
----------- ------------- -------------
Texas:
Dallas 4 23% 27%
Arlington 1 2 3
Austin 1 11 12
Colorado:
Englewood 1 11 9
Denver 1 10 7
Littleton 1 5 5
Oklahoma:
Tulsa 1 9 11
Ardmore 1 6 6
Iowa:
Davenport 1 9 8
Dubuque 1 8 8
South Carolina:
Hilton Head 1 6 3
Ohio:
Akron 1 -- 1
-- --- ---
15 100% 100%
== === ===
-21-
65
PART I
------
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
- - ------- -----------------
The Trust is involved in a number of legal proceedings arising in the normal
course of its business activities, none of which, in the opinion of the
Management, is expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial
position or liquidity of the Trust.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
- - ------ ---------------------------------------------------
No matters were submitted to a vote of the Trust's Shareholders during the
fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.
-22-
66
PART II
-------
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Matters
-------
Market Price Range:
- - ------------------
The shares of the Trust are traded in the Nasdaq National Market (symbol CTRIS).
The table below contains the quarterly high and low closing bid prices for such
Shares.
Fiscal 1996 Fiscal 1995
- - --------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
Quarter Ended High Low Quarter Ended High Low
- - ------------- ---- --- ------------- ---- ---
December 31, 1995 5-1/8 3-7/8 December 31, 1994 3-3/8 2-7/8
March 31, 1996 5/1/8 4-7/8 March 31, 1995 3-5/16 2-5/8
June 30, 1996 5 4-1/2 June 30, 1995 3-3/4 3-1/4
September 30, 1996 5 4-1/4 September 30, 1995 4-1/8 3-3/8
The bid prices for the Trust's Shares shown in the table above are interdealer
prices and do not reflect retail mark ups, mark downs, or commissions and may
not be representative of actual transactions. As of December 2, 1996, there were
approximately 1,125 record holders of the Shares.
Distributions to Shareholders:
-----------------------------
Fiscal 1996 Amount Fiscal 1995 Amount
Payment Date Per Share Payment Date Per Share
- - ------------ --------- ------------ ----------
October 20, 1995 $ .04 October 21, 1994 $.04
January 19, 1996 .04 January 20, 1995 .04
April 19, 1996 .04 April 21, 1995 .04
July 19, 1996 .04 July 21, 1995 .04
September 20, 1996 .04
---- ----
$.20 $.16
==== ====
For a discussion of the tax classification of cash distributions see
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations - Dividends.
Distributions are subject to a bank convenant which requires a minimum
Shareholders' Equity. At September 30, 1996 the amount of required Shareholders'
Equity was $20,000,000 and the amount free from this restriction was
approximately $2,500,000.
-23-
67
PART II
-------
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
- - ---------------------------------
Year Ended September 30, 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
- - ------------------------ ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(in thousands, except per share data)
OPERATIONS:
Rental income $ 10,368 $10,145 $ 9,650 $ 9,348 $ 9,400
Interest income 40 56 76 263 325
Dividend income 225 0 0 0 0
Other income 12 26 29 41 60
-------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Operating revenues 10,645 10,227 9,755 9,652 9,785
Provision for valuation reserve 3,307 0 0 0 0
Operating expenses other than provision
for valuation reserve 9,398 9,631 9,870 10,384 11,125
Operating income (loss) (2,060) 596 (115) (732) (1,340)
Gains on sales of real estate 40 2,499 445 563 51
Gains on sales of securities 632 0 0 0 0
Extraordinary items 0 790 253 286 0
Net income (loss) (1,388) 3,885 583 117 (1,289)
Cash distributions to shareholders 1,037 874 735 393 117
Per Share of Beneficial Interest:
Operating income (loss) ($0.40) $0.11 ($0.02) ($0.22) ($0.68)
Gains on sales of real estate 0.01 0.46 0.09 0.17 0.02
Gains on sales of securities 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Extraordinary items 0.00 0.14 0.05 0.09 0.00
-------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Net income (loss) ($ 0.27) $ 0.71 $ 0.12 $ 0.04 ($ 0.66)
======== ======= ======= ======== ========
Cash distributions $ 0.20 $ 0.16 $ 0.15 $ 0.12 $ 0.06
Weighted average number of Shares of
Beneficial Interest outstanding 5,186 5,459 4,959 3,292 1,957
At September 30, 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---------------------------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(in thousands)
FINANCIAL CONDITION:
Properties held for sale $42,203 $ 203 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Valuation reserve (3,307) 0 0 0 0
Investments in real estate 0 40,739 45,380 49,394 51,510
Real estate mortgage loans 119 303 236 150 1,986
Allowance for possible investment losses 0 0 0 (6,089) (6,089)
Investments in securities 0 267 0 0 0
Cash and cash equivalents 1,490 188 251 315 721
Certificates of deposit 0 0 500 500 500
Insurance settlement proceeds 0 0 3,341 0 0
Total assets 43,852 43,076 51,004 45,499 50,249
Mortgage notes payable 9,563 9,266 11,111 17,126 18,807
Bank notes payable 9,800 6,600 11,180 8,800 15,626
Shareholders' equity 22,500 25,126 23,150 17,669 13,714
Number of Shares of Beneficial Interest
outstanding at September 30 5,179 5,217 5,471 3,716 1,957
-24-
68
PART II
-------
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
- - ------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations.
---------------------
Financial Condition
- - -------------------
During the three-year period ended September 30, 1996 the Trust's total assets
decreased 4% to $43,852,000. On September 24, 1996 the Board of Trustees of the
Trust announced that they unanimously voted to recommend a Plan for the Orderly
Liquidation of the Trust (the "Plan"). The Plan, as proposed, would involve the
sale of the Trust's properties during a period of approximately three years.
Based on this announcement the Trust has reclassified all of its properties to
Properties held for sale at September 30, 1996, in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121 "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of" ("SFAS No. 121"). The
Trust made a review of the carrying value of all the properties at September 30,
1996 and determined that four of the Trust's properties had a carrying value
higher than the estimated fair value, less cost to sell. The Trust, therefore,
established a valuation reserve for these four properties which totaled
$3,307,000. In determining the estimated fair value, less cost to sell, the
Trust applied an estimated capitalization rate to the individual properties'
cash flow. The Trust did not deem it necessary to obtain appraisals of any of
its properties. See Item 2, Part I for allocation of the valuation reserve. In
1994 the Trust applied the allowance for possible investment losses to three
previously foreclosed properties for which it had been previously provided. This
application was done in connection with the Trust's regular evaluation of its
portfolio of properties. The evaluation concluded that it was unlikely that
these properties would recover in value and, therefore, they were written down
to their net realizable value.
During this three-year period the carrying value of the Trust's invested assets
decreased 10% or $4,440,000 to $39,015,000. In fiscal 1996 the Trust purchased
the land on which its Englewood Bank Building, located in Englewood, Colorado,
is located. This land, which was previously leased by the Trust, was purchased
for a price of $1,263,000. Also, the Trust purchased a 52,554 square foot
suburban office building located in Arlington, Texas, for a purchase price of
$2,202,000. Additionally, during 1996 the Trust sold three improved properties.
The first was the sale during January and February of three condominium units
located in Davie, Florida, for a combined sales price of $138,000 which resulted
in a gain of $69,000. The second was the $600,000 sale of European Crossroads in
Dallas, Texas, which resulted in a loss of $313,000. The third was a $615,000
sale of two of the five buildings comprising the Walnut Stemmons Office Park
located in Dallas, Texas and resulted in a gain of $261,000. In fiscal 1995 the
Trust sold three improved properties. The first was the sale of the 197 room
Quality Hotel in St. Louis, Missouri for $2,650,000, which resulted in a gain of
$452,000. The second was the sale of the 124 unit Parkwood Place Apartments in
Greeley, Colorado for $2,595,000, which resulted in a gain of $1,859,000. The
third was the sale of the 51,000 square foot Walnut Hill West office building in
Dallas, Texas for $800,000 which resulted in a gain of $97,000. In fiscal 1994
the Trust purchased a 104,000 square foot office building located in Dallas,
Texas for $3,918,000. Of this amount, $2,170,000 was provided by a first
mortgage loan on the property which the Trust obtained at the time of the
purchase. Additionally, the Trust sold four vacant land parcels during this
three-year period. The result of the three purchases during this three-year
period was an increase of approximately $7,387,000 to the carrying value of the
Trust's portfolio of invested assets. The result of all the sales during this
three year period was a decrease of approximately $5,328,000 to the carrying
value of the Trust's portfolio of invested assets. Additionally, the recording
of $5,648,000 of depreciation, a non-cash adjustment, reduced the carrying value
during this three-year period. Also, during this three-year period, the Trust
made improvements to its existing properties of $2,491,000 and received payments
totaling $533,000 on real estate mortgage loans.
-25-
69
PART II
-------
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations - (Continued)
--------------------
Financial Condition - (Continued)
- - -------------------
During the three-year period ended September 30, 1996 the Trust's mortgage notes
payable decreased 44% or $7,563,000 to $9,563,000. This resulted from additional
borrowings of $500,000 under one of the existing mortgage loans, amortization
payments of $1,029,000, the repayment of a $7,689,000 maturing loan, and
additional repayments/paydowns which reduced the mortgage notes payable
$1,515,000. Of this $1,515,000, the actual cash outlay by the Trust was
$1,463,000 with $52,000 representing discounts obtained by the Trust.
Additionally, the Trust obtained a $2,170,000 first mortgage loan in connection
with its purchase of a 104,000 square foot office building, as referenced above.
The Trust's bank notes payable increased $1,000,000 during the three-year period
ended September 30, 1996 to $9,800,000. The Trust borrowed $10,899,000,
$7,689,000 of which was used to repay the above referenced maturing mortgage
loan and the remaining $3,200,000 was used for the purchase of properties during
1996, and made principal amortization and repayments of $9,889,000.
During the three-year period ended September 30, 1996 the Trust's shareholders'
equity increased 27% or $4,831,000 to $22,500,000. This increase was primarily
the result of the Trust receiving $5,929,000 from its 1993 rights offering,
which expired January 28, 1994, net of $1,532,000 to repurchase 38,000 of the
Trust's Shares in fiscal 1996, 253,553 of the Trust's Shares in fiscal 1995 and
103,210 of the Trust's Shares in fiscal 1994, $3,080,000 of net income and
$2,646,000 of distributions to shareholders during this three-year period. As a
result of the Trust's total debt being reduced approximately $6,563,000 and
total shareholders' equity increasing $4,831,000, the Trust's debt to
shareholders' equity ratio has decreased to .86-to-1.00 at September 30, 1996
from 1.47-to-1.00 at September 30, 1993.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
- - -------------------------------
For each of the fiscal years ended September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994, the
Trust's portfolio of invested assets generated sufficient revenues to cover all
operating expenses (excluding depreciation, a non-cash expense and in 1996 the
provision for valuation reserve, also a non-cash expense), required mortgage
notes amortization payments, required bank amortization payments, capital
improvements to existing properties, and distributions to shareholders. During
this three-year period the year end occupancy of the Trust's portfolio has been
79% at September 30, 1994, 81% at September 30, 1995, and 91% at September 30,
1996 while the average rental rates per square foot have increased from $8.47
for the year ended September 30, 1994 to $8.61 for the year ended September 30,
1995 to $9.14 for the year ended September 30, 1996. At this time Management
assumes that the Trust will be implementing its Plan of liquidation during
fiscal 1997. On October 7, 1996 the Trust completed a $2,450,000 sale of the
Littleton Bank Building located in Littleton, Colorado. This sale resulted in a
gain of approximately $563,000 which will be reported in the first quarter of
Fiscal 1997. Currently, the Trust has four of its properties under contracts of
sales. The Englewood Bank Building located in Englewood, Colorado is under a
contract of sale for a sales price of $5,350,000. The Executive Club Building
located in Denver, Colorado is under a contract of sale for $5,300,000. The
Spring Village Shopping Center located in Davenport, Iowa is under a contract of
sale for a sales price of $5,350,000. The Warren Plaza Shopping Center loacated
in Dubuque, Iowa is under a contract of sale for a sales price of $5,950,000.
All four of these contracts provide for due diligence periods, during which time
the buyer could cancel the contract at his option. Additionally, after the
completion of the due diligence period the buyer will place a non-refundable
deposit with the Trust. Should the buyer fail to complete the sale, these
deposits would be forfeited and retained by the Trust. Therefore,
-26-
70
PART II
-------
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations - (Continued)
---------------------
Liquidity and Capital Resources - (Continued)
- - -------------------------------
there is no guarantee that these properties will actually be sold at the prices
stated. Also, the Trust has signed Letters of Intent with various buyers for the
sales of three additional properties. The total gross sales prices for these
three properties is $15,640,000. Letters of intent are only agreements in
principle on the most fundamental terms and the parties do not intend that there
be any binding obligation to buy or sell the property until such time as a
contract of sale is executed by both the buyer and the Trust. However, even
though additional properties could be sold during fiscal 1997 the Trust's
estimate for fiscal year 1997 is that operating revenues should be sufficient to
cover all operating expenses (excluding depreciation, a non-cash expense),
required monthly mortgage amortization payments and anticipated improvements to
existing properties. Under the Plan the only distributions the Trust will make
to Shareholders will be liquidating distributions resulting from the sales of
Properties. Additionally, during 1997 the Trust will accrue certain employee
severance payments which will be made to terminated employees primarily from the
proceeds of Property sales.
Management has from time to time undertaken a major renovation of a Property in
order to keep it competitive within its market. Currently, the Cannon West
Shopping Center located in Austin, Texas is having a trench drain installed at a
cost of approximately $150,000. This work is being done in order to combat a
sub-soil problem at the property. Management believes that the installation of
the trench drain will alleviate the problem. The cost of this work will be
reported in the first two quarters of fiscal year 1997. Additionally, Management
is reviewing plans for the installation of new store fronts at Tiffany Plaza, a
shopping center located in Ardmore, Oklahoma. The current estimated cost of this
work is $250,000. If the Trust proceeds with this work it should begin in the
spring of 1997. No other renovation projects are currently contemplated or in
process.
The Trust's cash flow from operations decreased $1,213,000 (55%) when comparing
1996 to 1995. The decrease was primarily due to the net activity of the
following items:
* In 1996 the Trust had an operating loss of $2,060,000 compared to an
operating income of $596,000 in 1995, or a decrease of $2,656,000. Included
in the 1996 results was a $3,307,000 provision for valuation reserve, which
was a non-cash expense. Also, income from real estate operations was
$424,000 higher in 1996 than 1995. Additionally, 1996 included $225,000 of
dividend income with no like income in 1995.
* Other assets increased $1,971,000 from 1995 to 1996. Of this amount
$1,918,000 represents the amount due the Trust on its sale of securities,
which amount was received by the Trust on October 1, 1996.
For 1996 the net cash used in investing activities was $1,995,000. As previously
discussed, the Trust purchased land and a suburban office building for a total
of $3,465,000. The Trust also purchased securities for $2,057,000. Additionally,
the Trust expended $972,000 for improvements to existing properties. Cash
inflows included proceeds from the sale of three condominiums, two small office
buildings and a retail center totaling $1,386,000, $2,929,000 from the sale of
securities and $184,000 in real estate mortgage loan repayments. During 1995, as
previously discussed, the Trust sold three improved properties and a vacant land
parcel. The proceeds from these sales totaled $5,545,000. Additionally, at the
completion of the
-27-
71
PART II
-------
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
- - ------ ---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations - (Continued)
---------------------
Liquidity and Capital Resources - (Continued)
- - -------------------------------
renovation and repair project on the Tulsa, Oklahoma Petroleum Club Building the
insurance settlement proceeds exceeded the expenditures for the work by
$738,000. The Trust also received $145,000 in real estate loan repayments. The
only net cash outflow was the $666,000 (primarily tenant improvements) spent on
improvements to existing properties and the $240,000 which the Trust invested in
the purchase of 14,000 shares in a real estate company. In 1996 net cash from
financing activities totaled $2,286,000 while in 1995 net cash used in financing
activities totaled $7,809,000, a variance of $10,095,000. Mortgage notes payable
amortization payments were $203,000 in 1996 and $330,000 in 1995. Principal
prepayments were $1,463,000 in 1995, as the Trust repaid a $498,000 first
mortgage loan and settled a $1,017,000 first mortgage loan for $965,000 (the
settlement resulted in a $52,000 extraordinary income item). In 1996 the Trust
borrowed an additional $500,000 on one of its existing mortgage loans. In 1995
the Trust paid off its $3,460,000 1986 loan and paid down the 1994 Credit
(defined below) $1,089,000. In 1996 the Trust borrowed $3,200,000 which was used
in the purchase of property, as previously discussed. In 1996 the Trust
repurchased and retired 38,000 of its shares at a cost of $174,000. In 1995 the
Trust repurchased and retired 14,000 of its shares for a cost of $48,000 and
through a tender offer made to all shareholders of the Trust repurchased and
retired 239,553 of its shares for a cost of $1,014,000. In 1995 the Trust
redeemed a $500,000 certificate of deposit. In 1996 the Trust made five
distributions of $.04 per share to shareholders of the Trust for a total of
$1,037,000. In 1995 the Trust made four distributions of $.04 per share for a
total of $874,000.
On November 30, 1994 the Trust and National City Bank of Cleveland, Ohio and
Manufacturer's and Traders Trust Company of Buffalo, New York executed a
revolving line of credit agreement for a maximum of $25,000,000 (limited by the
value of the collateral provided) ("1994 Credit"). The 1994 Credit was for an
initial term of three years. Each year the lenders review the 1994 Credit with
the option of extending the credit for one additional year. During 1996 the
lenders extended the 1994 Credit to March 1, 1999. If the lenders do not extend
the credit then, absent an event of acceleration, the Trust will have two years
in which to repay all borrowings outstanding under the 1994 Credit. The loans
will bear interest at the Trust's option at any of the following rates: (i) 1/4
of 1% over the prime lending rate; (ii) 250 basis points over the LIBOR rate; or
(iii) NCB's fixed interest rate available from time to time.
In addition to the required monthly amortization payments under the terms of the
first mortgage loans the Trust currently has (see Note E to the financial
statements), during the next five fiscal years the Trust's major debt maturities
are: in fiscal 1999 the 1994 Credit, which currently has a balance of $9,800,000
outstanding and on August 19, 2000 a $2,612,000 first mortgage loan.
Since Management is currently under the assumption that the Trust will be
selling its Properties under the Plan, the 1994 Credit and the first mortgage
loans should be repaid through the sales of the Properties. The first mortgage
loans will be required to be paid off at the closing of the sale of the Property
securing the loan. The 1994 Credit will be paid down at the time any of the
Properties securing the 1994 Credit are sold.
Results of Operations
- - ---------------------
FISCAL YEAR COMPARISON:
Income from real estate operations in 1996 increased $424,000 (14%) and $781,000
(29%) as compared to
-28-
72
PART II
-------
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations - (Continued)
---------------------
Results of Operations - (Continued)
- - ---------------------
1995 and 1994, respectively. The increases related primarily to higher rental
income in 1996 compared to both 1995 and 1994 and lower depreciation expense in
1996 compared to both 1995 and 1995. Rental income was $223,000 (2%) higher in
1996 than 1995, and $718,000 (7%) higher in 1996 than 1994. Depreciation expense
in 1996 was $16,000 (1%) and $142,000 (7%) lower than in 1995 and 1994,
respectively. Real estate operating expenses were $185,000 (4%) lower in 1996
than 1995, but $79,000 (2%) higher in 1996 than 1994. The reasons for these
variances in rental income, real estate operating expenses and depreciation
expense are described below.
The Trust considers the cyclical nature of real estate markets a normal part of
portfolio risk. The performance of the various real estate markets and economies
of the Southwest remains mixed. Improvement in the Trust's operations will
depend partially upon further economic recovery of the Southwest and, in
particular, the local markets and properties where the Trust operates,
especially Dallas, Texas.
1996 - 1995
Income from real estate operations increased $424,000 (14%) from 1995 to 1996.
Rental income increased $223,000 (2%) from 1995 to 1996. Real estate operating
expenses were $185,000 lower in 1996 than 1995. The increase in rental income
was primarily due to an increase in occupancy (91% at September 30, 1996 versus
81.5% at September 30, 1995) and an increase in average rental rates ($9.14 per
occupied square foot at September 30, 1996 versus $8.61 per occupied square foot
at September 30, 1995). The decrease in real estate operating expenses was
primarily due to the sales during 1995 of the 124 unit Parkwood Place Apartments
located in Greeley, Colorado and the 51,000 square foot Walnut Hill West office
building located in Dallas, Texas, as well as the March, 1996 sale of the
European Crossroads a office/retail complex located in Dallas, Texas. During
1996 the Trust received $225,000 of dividend income on securities owned. There
was no dividend income reported in 1995. At September 30, 1996, in accordance
with the Plan the Trust made a provision for valuation reserve of $3,307,000.
There was no provision made in 1995.
In 1996 the Trust recorded net gains on the sales of real estate totaling
$40,000 as the result of four sales. The sales were as follows: (i) In January
and February, 1996 the sale of three condominium units located in Davie, Florida
for a combined sale of $138,000, resulting in a total gain of $69,000; (ii)
March, 1996 $600,000 sale of the European Crossroads located in Dallas, Texas,
which resulted in a loss of $313,000; (iii) April, 1996 $115,000 sale of 7.42
acres of vacant land located in Akron, Ohio, which resulted in a gain of
$23,000; and (iv) September, 1996 $615,000 sale of two of the five buildings of
the Walnut Stemmons Office Park located in Dallas, Texas, which resulted in a
gain of $261,000. In 1995 the Trust reported gains on the sales of real estate
totaling $2,499,000 on the sales of four properties. These sales are described
in detail under the 1995 - 1994 analysis below.
In 1996 the Trust recorded gains on the sales of securities of $632,000. There
were no gains on the sales of securities for 1995. For 1996 there were no
extraordinary items. For 1995 the Trust reported $790,000 of extraordinary items
which are described under the 1995 - 1994 analysis below.
1995 - 1994
Income from real estate operations increased $357,000 (13%) from 1994 to 1995.
Rental income increased
-29-
73
PART II
-------
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations - (Continued)
---------------------
Results of Operations - (Continued)
- - ---------------------
$495,000 (5%) from 1994 to 1995. Real estate operating expenses were $264,000
(5%) higher in 1995 compared to 1994. The increase in rental income and real
estate operating expenses were primarily due to the Trust's purchase in August,
1994 of a 104,000 square foot office building located in Dallas, Texas.
Additionally, depreciation expense was $126,000 (6%) lower in 1995 than 1994.
The $343,000 (16%) decrease in interest expense was primarily due to lower
outstanding balances. In March, 1995 the Trust repaid a $498,000 first mortgage
loan on its shopping center located in Ardmore, Oklahoma. In May, 1995 the Trust
settled at a discount a $1,017,000 first mortgage loan on its office building
located in Englewood, Colorado. In February and March, 1995 the Trust repaid the
$3,460,000 1986 loan it had with a bank. Additionally, the Trust reduced the
1994 Credit balance from $7,689,000 to $6,600,000 (a reduction of $1,089,000)
during 1995.
In 1995 the Trust recorded gains totaling $2,499,000 as the result of four
property sales. The sales and gains were as follows: (i) February, 1995
$2,650,000 sale of the 197 room Quality Hotel located in St. Louis, Missouri,
which resulted in a gain of $452,000; (ii) March, 1995 $2,595,000 sale of the
124 unit Parkwood Place Apartments located in Greeley, Colorado which resulted
in a gain of $1,859,000; (iii) March, 1995 $800,000 sale of the 51,000 square
foot Walnut Hill West office building located in Dallas, Texas which resulted in
a gain of $97,000; and (iv) May, 1995 $212,000 sale of 17.7697 acres of vacant
land located in Akron, Ohio which resulted in a gain of $91,000. In 1994 the
Trust recorded gains on the sales of both a 69 acre and a 17 acre vacant land
parcel located in Akron, Ohio which resulted in total gains of $445,000.
In 1995 the Trust settled at a discount a $1,017,000 first mortgage loan on its
office building located in Englewood, Colorado. This settlement resulted in an
extraordinary income item of $52,000. In January 1994 the Trust's Petroleum Club
Building located in Tulsa, Oklahoma sustained a major fire. In July, 1994 the
Trust and its insurance company agreed on a settlement of $6,025,000. The Trust
has completed all necessary repairs and building improvements. Upon completion
of the work there was $738,000 of the settlement which had not been expended.
The Trust has recorded this $738,000 as an extraordinary income item in fiscal
1995. In addition $253,000 was the cost of building improvements made as part of
the building restoration. This $253,000 was capitalized as building improvements
and also was recorded as an extraordinary income item in fiscal 1994.
Dividends:
- - ---------
For 1994 the Trust paid distributions to its shareholders of $735,000 or $.15
per share. For the shareholders $.07 per share of these distributions were
classified for tax purposes as dividends and $.08 per share were classified as
return of capital.
For 1995 the Trust paid distributions to its shareholders of $874,000 or $.16
per share. For the shareholders these distributions were classified for tax
purposes as dividends.
For 1996 the Trust paid distributions to its shareholders of $1,037,000 or $.20
per share. For the shareholders the $.04 per share paid in October, 1995 was
classified for tax purposes as dividends. The $.04 ($.16 total) per share paid
in January, April, July, and September, 1996 will be classified for tax purposes
as return of capital.
-30-
74
PART II
-------
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations - (Continued)
---------------------
Income Taxes:
- - ------------
At September 30, 1996 the Trust had net deferred tax assets of approximately
$3,048,000. As was the case at both September 30, 1995 and 1994 the Trust has
established a valuation allowance equal to its net tax assets as there is doubt
as to whether the net deferred tax asset will be realized.
Other:
- - -----
Inflation, which has been at relatively low rates for the past three years, has
had an immaterial impact on the Trust's operations during the three-year period
ended September 30, 1996.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
- - ------ -------------------------------------------
The response to this Item is submitted in a separate section of this report. See
Item 14 of this report for information concerning financial statements and
schedules filed with this report. The quarterly financial data required by this
item is included as Note L of the Notes to Financial Statements filed in Part
IV, Item 14 (a) (1) and (2).
Item 9. Disagreement on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
- - ------ ----------------------------------------------------
There has not been any change in the Trust's independent auditors, nor have
there been any disagreements concerning accounting principles, auditing
procedures, or financial statement disclosure within the twenty four (24) months
prior to the date of the most recent financial statements presented in this
report.
-31-
75
PART III
--------
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.
- - -------- --------------------------------------------------
Trustees of the Registrant:
- - --------------------------
Based upon information received from the respective Trustees as of
November 15, 1996, the following information with respect to each person is
furnished:
Position(s) with the Trust,
Principal Occupation, Business
Name (Age) of Trustee Experience and Other Directorships
- - --------------------- -----------------------------------
Howard Amster
(49)(a) Trustee of the Trust since December, 1992; Investment Consultant
with Everen Securities, Inc. (securities, investments), Director of
Astrex, Inc. (distributor of electronic components).
Robert H. Kanner
(49)(b) Trustee of the Trust since December, 1992; President, Chairman and a
Director of Pubco Corporation (computer printer supplies,
manufacturing, and specialty construction products). Until June 27,
1996, President, Chairman and a Director of Bobbie Brooks,
Incorporated and Chairman and a Director of Aspen Imaging
International, Inc., which companies were merged into Pubco
Corporation on that date. Director of Riser Foods, Inc. (food
distribution).
John C. Kikol
(52) Trustee of the Trust since 1982; President of the Trust since 1974;
Chairman of the Trust since February, 1995.
Leighton A. Rosenthal
(81)(c) Trustee of the Trust since October, 1991; President LARS Aviation,
Inc. (private aircraft charters), Cleveland, Ohio.
John D. Weil
(56)(d) Trustee of the Trust since June, 1991; President Clayton Management
Co. (bookkeeping and investment management services), St. Louis,
Missouri. Director of Cliffs Drilling (oil service), Oglebay Norton
Company (lake shipping, mining and manufacturing), Physicians
Insurance Company of Ohio (medical malpractice insurance) and Todd
Shipyards, Inc. (ship building and repair company).
<FN>
(a) Chairman of the Audit Committee.
(b) Chairman of Investment Committee.
(c) Chairman of the Nominating Committee.
(d) Chairman of Compensation Committee.
Each Trustee is a member of all of the Committees of the Trust, except that Mr.
Kikol does not serve on the Compensation
-32-
76
PART III
--------
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant - (Continued)
- - -------- -------------------------------------------------
Committee.
Except as otherwise indicated in the above table, each Trustee has had the
principal occupation or former occupation indicated for more than five years.
Executive Officers of the Registrant:
- - ------------------------------------
Position(s) with the Trust,
Principal Occupation,
Business, Experience,
Name (age) and Other Directorships
- - ---------- ---------------------------
John E. Kikol (52) Chairman; Chairman of the Board of
Trustees since 1995; Trustee of the Trust
since 1982; President of the Trust since 1974.
Michael R. Thoms(48) Vice President and Treasurer of the Trust since 1987.
Raymond C. Novinc(47) Vice President, Secretary and Counsel of the Trust
since 1986.
Brian D. Griesinger (35) Vice President--Management and Acquisitions of
the Trust since 1989.
Item 11 Executive Compensation.
- - -------- ----------------------
Summary Compensation of Executive Officers:
- - ------------------------------------------
The following table sets forth the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to
the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, who was the
only executive officer of the Trust whose total salary and bonus exceeded
$100,000 for fiscal 1996.
Summary Compensation Table
Long-term
Compensation
Name and Fiscal ------------ All Other
Principal Year Salary Bonuses Options Compensation
Position Ended $ $ Granted (1) $(2)
-------- ----- - - ----------- ----
John C. Kikol 9/30/96 $135,000 $47,000 -- $15,151
Chairman, President 9/30/95 135,000 47,000 3,000 $13,197
& Chief Executive 9/30/94 134,872 22,500 15,000 8,915
Officer
-33-
77
PART III
--------
Item 11. Executive Compensation. - (Continued)
- - ------- ----------------------
(1) Mr. Kikol agreed to waive all rights with respect to options granted under
the Trust's 1992 Stock Option Plan in the Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement, dated as of September 24, 1996, between the Trust and Mr. Kikol.
See "New Employment Agreement."
(2) For fiscal 1996, represents the premium paid ($2,400) by the Trust for a
"key man" insurance policy for the benefit of the Chief Executive Officer
and his designated heirs and pension plan contribution ($12,751) for the
Chief Executive Officer.
Old Employment Agreement:
- - ------------------------
Effective as of January 1, 1993, the Trust entered into an Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") with John C. Kikol, the Chief Executive
Officer of the Trust. The Agreement obligated the Trust to pay the Chief
Executive Officer an annual base salary, subject to increase at the discretion
of the Board. The Agreement also provided for an annual incentive cash bonus to
the Chief Executive Officer based upon financial goals to be established by the
Trust's Compensation Committee. Either the Trust or the Chief Executive Officer
had the right to terminate the Agreement at any time, for any reason, without
any prior notice to the other; however, in the event of the Trust's termination
of the Chief Executive Officer, or a material change in the Chief Executive
Officer's duties (other than for termination for a felony conviction as
described in the Agreement), the Chief Executive Officer was entitled to a
severance payment equal to the product of the Chief Executive Officer's base
monthly salary plus one-twelfth of the officer's prior year's incentive cash
bonus multiplied by a factor of 1.5 times the number of years the Chief
Executive Officer was employed by the Trust or its previous Adviser, up to a
maximum factor of thirty-six. Had the Trust elected to terminate the Chief
Executive Officer as of December 31, 1996, the Trust would have been obligated
to pay Mr. Kikol the sum of $546,000 as a severance payment under the Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event the Chief Executive Officer refused
to accept a transfer to a location outside the Cleveland area where the Trust
has a substantial investment, the Trust's obligation for severance payment set
forth above would be reduced to 50% of the above maximum severance payment. The
Agreement also contained certain other provisions customary in executive
compensation and employment agreements.
The terms of Mr. Kikol's employment with the Trust were amended and completely
restated by the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of September
24, 1996, between the Trust and Mr. Kikol, which will be deemed to have become
effective September 1, 1996, provided that the shareholders of the Trust approve
the Employment Agreement. See "Ratification of Employment Agreement."
New Employment Agreement:
- - ------------------------
In connection with the adoption of the Plan by the Board of Trustees, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees has approved the Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement, effective as of September 1, 1996, between the
Trust and Mr. Kikol (the "Employment Agreement"), subject to the approval of the
Trust's shareholders. The Employment Agreement amends and completely restates
the terms of Mr. Kikol's employment as President of the Trust as formerly set
forth in an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 1,
1993 between Mr. Kikol and the Trust.
PURPOSE. The Trust entered into the Employment Agreement in order to induce Mr.
Kikol to remain as President to implement and oversee execution of the Plan, and
to provide incentive to Mr. Kikol to maximize the liquidating distributions to
shareholders of the Trust by tying his compensation to the aggregate amount of
such distributions.
SALARY, BONUS AND OTHER COMPENSATION. The Employment Agreement provides that the
Trust will pay Mr. Kikol a base salary, from the date of effectiveness of the
Employment Agreement through December 31, 1996, at a rate of $135,000 per year
payable in semi-monthly installments, plus a bonus of $47,000 payable on
December 1, 1996. After December 31, 1996, Mr. Kikol's base salary will be paid
by the Trust at a rate of $182,000 per year in semi-monthly installments.
-34-
78
PART III
--------
Item 11. Executive Compensation. - (Continued)
- - -------- ----------------------
Under the Employment Agreement, Mr. Kikol waived all rights to unexercised stock
options to purchase Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust granted to him
under the Trust's 1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan. In lieu of such options, the
Trust will pay to Mr. Kikol amounts based upon the liquidating distributions to
the Trust's shareholders from time to time (the "Payments"), including a gross
up amount (the "Gross Up Amount") that, when added to the Payments, will allow
Mr. Kikol to retain a net amount after payment of all federal, state and local
income taxes equal to the net amount of the Payments. The Payments and Gross Up
Amount will be paid to Mr. Kikol at the same time as liquidating distributions
are made to shareholders. The Payments are designed to compensate Mr. Kikol in
amounts similar to the liquidating distributions that he would receive if he
exercised the options prior to such distributions. The Payments would be net of
the exercise price of the respective options, and the Gross Up Amount would be
paid in recognition of the fact that Mr. Kikol would have been able to apply
capital loss carryforwards to any capital gains he would recognize on the sale
of Shares of Beneficial Interest acquired through exercise of the incentive
stock options. The Trust believes that it will not be economically disadvantaged
by payment of the Gross Up Amount because the Trust expects to be able to deduct
for federal income tax purposes the full amount of Payments and the Gross Up
Amount, whereas it would not be entitled to any deduction upon the exercise of
incentive stock options.
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM. The Employment Agreement also provides for
participation by Mr. Kikol in an incentive compensation program for officers of
the Trust (the "Incentive Compensation Program"). Under the Incentive
Compensation Program, an incentive compensation pool is created for distribution
to certain key employees. The amount to be allocated to the pool is calculated
based on amounts otherwise available to be paid by the Trust as liquidating
distributions to its shareholders. The amount allocated to the pool will be the
sum of: (a) 10% of all amounts otherwise available for distribution between
$4.75 and $5.50 per Share; and (b) 15% of all amounts otherwise available for
distribution in excess of $5.50 per Share. For purposes of computing the amount
payable to the pool, liquidating distributions when made are reduced to their
present value amount as of January 1, 1997 using a discount rate of 10%. The
amounts will be allocable to the pool and available for distribution to the key
employees at the same time, and from time to time, as liquidating distributions
are made to shareholders. Mr. Kikol is entitled to receive not less than 80% of
amounts distributed from the pool.
If the Trust continues to hold properties at the end of the Liquidation Period,
the value of such properties will be considered a deemed distribution to
shareholders as of the end of the Liquidation Period in order to complete the
determination of all present valued liquidating distributions made during the
liquidation process. The Trust will then have the option of (i) allocating to
the pool an amount based on the deemed distribution of unsold properties
(reduced to a present value number and based on the 10%/15% formula described
above) or (ii) making an in kind allocation to the pool of an ownership interest
in the remaining unsold properties equal in value to the amount described in
(i).
If Mr. Kikol is terminated by the Trust (a) during 1998 and he has failed to
sell at least three Trust properties before the end of calendar year 1997 or (b)
during 1999 or thereafter and he has failed to sell at least three Trust
properties during calendar year 1998, Mr. Kikol is entitled to an immediate cash
payment of $250,000 in lieu of any participation in the pool. If Mr. Kikol's
employment is terminated during 1997 or during the periods indicated above and
he has not failed to sell the required number of Trust properties as described
above, Mr. Kikol will be entitled to payments from the pool when pool
distributions are made, as if his employment had not been terminated. Mr. Kikol
will have this same entitlement if he voluntarily terminates his employment
because of a material change in his duties. If Mr. Kikol's employment is
terminated because of his death or disability and prior to such death or
disability the present valued liquidating distributions paid and payable from
the proceeds of sales of Trust properties equaled or exceeded $4.75 per share,
he or his personal representative, as the case may be, will be entitled to
receive distributions from the pool to the extent that prior pool distributions
have not taken into account such present valued liquidating distributions. If
Mr. Kikol is terminated for misappropriation of Trust funds or property in the
amount of $25,000 or more, or if he voluntarily terminates his employment with
the Trust other than because of a material change in his duties, he forfeits any
right to payment from the pool.
-35-
79
PART III
--------
Item 11. Executive Compensation. - (Continued)
- - -------- ----------------------
CERTAIN BENEFITS. The Employment Agreement provides for the continuation of
certain plan benefits currently provided to Mr. Kikol, including health and
accident insurance, retirement, group life insurance and similar plan benefits.
Mr. Kikol also is entitled to payment or reimbursement of business expenses, the
use of an automobile, the payment of club dues and the payment of premiums on an
insurance policy on his life.
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. The Employment Agreement may be terminated by either
the Trust or Mr. Kikol at any time and for any reason without prior notice to
the other. If terminated (i) by the Trust (except on the grounds of Mr. Kikol's
misappropriation of Trust funds or property) or (ii) by the death or disability
of Mr. Kikol or (iii) by Mr. Kikol because of a material change in his duties,
the Employment Agreement provides for a severance payment to Mr. Kikol in the
amount of $546,000. Such severance payment will be paid only if Mr. Kikol
delivers to the Trust, prior to such payment, a release of all claims against
the Trust. The Employment Agreement automatically terminates upon the death or
disability of Mr. Kikol. This severance payment is in addition to any payment to
which Mr. Kikol may be entitled under the Incentive Compensation Program
described above.
PAYMENT OF LEGAL FEES. The Employment Agreement provides for the payment of Mr.
Kikol's legal fees and expenses under certain circumstances, including the
failure of the Trust to comply with its obligations under the Employment
Agreement or in the event that the Trust or any other person takes action to
declare the Employment Agreement void and unenforceable or institutes litigation
to deny or recover from Mr. Kikol the benefits intended to be provided under the
Employment Agreement.
EXCISE TAX GROSS UP PAYMENT. If amounts payable to Mr. Kikol under the
Employment Agreement become subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of
the Internal Revenue Code, he is entitled to a gross up payment such that, after
the payment of the excise tax and any federal, state or local income taxes on
such gross up payment, he retains a net amount equal to the amount he would if
retained from payments under the Employment Agreement had the excise tax not
been applicable.
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT. The Employment Agreement provides that, if so requested by
the Trust by means of 90 days advance written notice, Mr. Kikol will manage the
remaining unsold properties of the Trust, if any, upon completion of the
liquidation process, for an annual management fee equal to five percent of the
"gross property income" of such properties (i.e., gross rental receipts without
reduction for customary on-site expenses or reasonable travel expenses related
to such property) pursuant to a separate management agreement. Mr. Kikol's
duties under such an agreement would be, among others, to attend to routine
operational obligations associated with property management, administrative
matters, investor relations and public company duties. All salary and benefits
payable to Mr. Kikol under the Employment Agreement (other than those which
become payable prior to its termination) will cease at the commencement of the
term of the management agreement. Either party may terminate such management
services upon 90 days advance written notice to the other.
RATIFICATION. Ratification by shareholders of the adoption by the Board of
Trustees of the Employment Agreement requires the affirmative vote of holders of
a majority of Shares of Beneficial Interest represented at the meeting at which
such is taken. Such ratification is assured because Trustees of the Trust
holding approximately 70% of the outstanding Shares of Beneficial Interest of
the Trust have agreed to vote their Shares in favor of ratification of the
Employment Agreement.
The Trust compensates all Trustees (other than Mr. Kikol, who does not receive
fees for service as a Trustee) at a rate of $8,000 per annum which is paid in
quarterly installments of $2,000, said sum being in lieu of all meeting and
other fees. In addition, all Trustees are reimbursed for actual expenses
incurred in connection with meetings attended or extended services provided.
-36-
80
PART III
--------
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
- - -------- --------------------------------------------------------------
The following table sets forth, as of November 15, 1996, information furnished
to the Trust with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Trust's Shares of
Beneficial Interest by each shareholder or group of shareholders known to the
Trust to be the beneficial owner of more than five (5%) percent of the Trust's
outstanding Shares of Beneficial Interest, each present Trustee, each nominee
for election as Trustee, each executive officer of the Trust, and all present
Trustees and executive officers of the Trust as a group.
Beneficial Owner, Trustee, Number of Shares
Officer or Number of Persons Beneficially Percent of
in Group Owned(a) Class
-------- -------- -----------
Howard Amster (Beneficial owner and Trustee)(b) 1,152,180 22.4%
23811 Chagrin Blvd., Chagrin Plaza East
Suite 200
Beachwood, Ohio 44122
Robert H. Kanner (Beneficial owner and Trustee)(c) 1,300,000 25.3
3830 Kelley Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
John C. Kikol (Trustee and officer)(d) 70,479 1.4
2001 Crocker Road, Suite 400
Westlake, Ohio 44145
Leighton A. Rosenthal (Beneficial owner and Trustee) 393,000 7.7
The Halle Building, Suite 310
1228 Euclid Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44115
John D. Weil (Beneficial owner and Trustee)(e) 745,000 14.5
200 North Broadway, Suite 825
St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2573
Brian D. Griesinger (Officer) 7,000 *
2001 Crocker Road, Suite 400
Westlake, Ohio 44145
Raymond C. Novinc (Officer) 8,045 *
2001 Crocker Road, Suite 400
Westlake, Ohio 44145
Michael R. Thoms (Officer)(d) 28,055 *
2001 Crocker Road, Suite 400
Westlake, Ohio 44145
8 present Trustees and officers listed above 3,688,820 71.8
<FN>
* Less than one percent.
(a) Except as noted, in each case the beneficial owner has sole voting and sole investment power.
-37-
81
PART III
--------
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. -
- - -------- --------------------------------------------------------------
(Continued)
(b) Includes 131,800 Shares of Beneficial Interest held by Tamra F. Gould
(Mr. Amster's wife) in which Mr. Amster disclaims any beneficial
interest. Excludes 27,600 Shares of Beneficial Interest held by Sonia
Amster (Mr. Amster's mother) in which Mr. Amster disclaims any
beneficial interest.
(c) The shares shown as being held by Robert H. Kanner are owned by a trust
of which Mr. Kanner is the sole beneficiary. Mr. Kanner is not a
trustee of such trust and has neither investment nor voting power in
such shares. Trustees of such trust are Stephen R. Kalette and Eleonora
Grmek who have an address of 3830 Kelley Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44114.
Excludes 5,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest held by Buckeye Business
Products Bargaining Unit Pension Trust of which Mr. Kanner is a trustee
but not a participant.
(d) Includes 14,934 Shares of Beneficial Interest held in a trust in which
Messrs. Kikol and Thoms are trustees with all voting and investment
power and have an interest as beneficiaries (with respect to a portion
of the trust's assets). The shares of Beneficial Interest held by all
Trustees and officers as a group in the table have been adjusted to
eliminate the duplication of beneficial ownership.
(e) Includes 25,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest held in the name of a
family trust of which Mr. Weil is the trustee. Also includes 100,000
Shares of Beneficial Interest held in the name of Richard K. Weil (the
father of Mr. Weil), 25,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest held in the
name of Victoria L. Weil (the daughter of Mr. Weil) and 225,000 Shares
of Beneficial Interest in the aggregate held by Richard K. Weil, Jr.,
Mark S. Weil and Paula K. Weil (siblings of Mr. Weil), the beneficial
ownership of which he disclaims.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
- - -------- ----------------------------------------------
None.
-38-
82
PART IV
-------
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.
- - -------- -----------------------------------------------------------------
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this
Report:
(1) The Financial Statements listed on the List of
Financial Statements and Financial Statement
Schedules are filed as a separate section of
this Report.
(2) The Financial Statement Schedules listed on the
List of the Financial Statements and Financial
Statement Schedules are filed as a separate
section of this Report.
(3) The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation
S-K and identified on the Exhibit Index
contained in this Report.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K filed in the fourth quarter of
Fiscal Year 1996:
Form 8-K dated September 24, 1996
Item 5. Other Events - - On September 24, 1996 the
Board of Trustees of CleveTrust Realty Investors
(the "Trust") determined that it would submit to
the shareholders of the Trust a plan for the
orderly liquidation of the Trust pursuant to
Article XIII of the Trust's Declaration. A copy of
a News Release dated September 25, 1996 was filed
as Exhibit 99.1.
Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits - - Press
Release dated September 25, 1996.
(c) The exhibits being filed with this Report are
identified on the Exhibit Index contained in this
Report.
(d) The Financial Statement Schedules are filed as a
separate section of this Report.
-39-
83
SIGNATURES
----------
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
Dated: December 9, 1996 By: /s/ Michael R. Thoms
----------------------------
Michael R. Thoms
Vice President and Treasurer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the date indicated:
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
*/s/ John C. Kikol Chairman of the Board of December 9, 1996
- - ---------------------------- Trustees, President and
John C. Kikol Principal Executive Officer
/s/ Michael R. Thoms Vice President, Treasurer
- - ---------------------------- Principal Financial Officer December 9, 1996
Michael R. Thoms and Principal Accounting
Officer
*/s/ Howard Amster Trustee December 9, 1996
- - ----------------------------
Howard Amster
*/s/ Robert H. Kanner Trustee December 9, 1996
- - ----------------------------
Robert H. Kanner
*/s/ Leighton A. Rosenthal Trustee December 9, 1996
- - ----------------------------
Leighton A. Rosenthal
*/s/ John D. Weil Trustee December 9, 1996
- - ----------------------------
John D. Weil
*/s/ By: Michael R. Thoms December 9, 1996
- - ----------------------------
Michael R. Thoms
Attorney-in-Fact
-40-
84
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
PART IV, ITEM 14(a)(1) and (2) and ITEM 14(d)
LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
WESTLAKE, OHIO
85
Form 10-K --Part IV, Item 14(a)(1) and (2)
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Financial Statements:
The following financial statements of CleveTrust Realty Investors are included
in Part II, Item 8:
Statement of Financial Condition -- September 30, 1996 and 1995
Statement of Operations -- Years ended September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994
Statement of Cash Flows -- Years ended September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994
Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity -- Years ended September 30,
1996, 1995 and 1994
Notes to Financial Statements
Financial Statement Schedules:
The following financial statement schedules of CleveTrust Realty Investors are
included in Part IV, Item 14 (d):
Schedule III -- Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation.
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related
instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted.
F-1
86
Report of Independent Auditors
Trustees and Shareholders
CleveTrust Realty Investors
Westlake, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying statement of financial condition of CleveTrust
Realty Investors as of September 30, 1996 and 1995, and the related statements
of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended September 30, 1996. Our audits also included the
financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 14(a). These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Trust's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of CleveTrust Realty Investors at
September 30, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 1996 in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion,
the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.
Ernst & Young LLP
November 15, 1996
Cleveland, Ohio
F-2
87
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
September 30,
-----------------------------------------
1996 1995
------------ -------------
(in thousands)
ASSETS
Invested assets - - NOTES A, C and D:
Properties held for sale $ 42,203 $ 203
Less: Valuation reserve 3,307 0
-------- --------
38,896 203
Investments in real estate
Improved properties 0 63,282
Less: Accumulated depreciation 0 22,543
-------- --------
0 40,739
Real estate mortgage loans 119 303
-------- --------
39,015 41,245
Cash and cash equivalents - - NOTE A 1,490 188
Investments in securities - - NOTE A 0 267
Other assets 3,347 1,376
-------- --------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 43,852 $ 43,076
======== ========
LIABILITIES
Mortgage notes payable - NOTE E $ 9,563 $ 9,266
Bank notes payable - NOTE F 9,800 6,600
Accrued interest on notes payable - NOTE F 14 23
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 1,975 2,061
-------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES 21,352 17,950
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Shares of Beneficial Interest, par value
$1 per Share - - NOTE G:
Authorized - - Unlimited
Issued and outstanding shares
(9/30/96 - 5,179,143; 9/30/95 - 5,217,143) 5,179 5,217
Additional paid-in capital 38,850 38,986
Accumulated deficit (21,529) (19,104)
-------- --------
22,500 25,099
Unrealized gains on securities 0 27
-------- --------
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 22,500 25,126
-------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY $43,852 $ 43,076
======= ========
F-3
88
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
Year ended September 30,
--------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------------- ------------- ------------
(in thousands, except per share data)
INCOME
Real estate operations:
Rental income $ 10,368 $ 10,145 $ 9,650
Less:
Real estate operating expenses 5,060 5,245 4,981
Depreciation expenses 1,830 1,846 1,972
-------- -------- --------
6,890 7,091 6,953
-------- -------- --------
Income from real estate operations 3,478 3,054 2,697
Interest income 40 56 76
Dividend income 225 0 0
Other 12 26 29
-------- -------- --------
3,755 3,136 2,802
EXPENSES
Interest:
Mortgage notes payable - - NOTE E 888 988 1,678
Bank notes payable - - NOTE F 886 789 442
-------- -------- --------
1,774 1,777 2,120
General and Administrative 734 763 797
Provision for valuation reserve 3,307 0 0
-------- -------- --------
5,815 2,540 2,917
-------- -------- --------
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) (2,060) 596 (115)
Net gains on sales of real estate - -NOTE D 40 2,499 445
Gains on sales of securities 632 0 0
-------- -------- --------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS (1,388) 3,095 330
Extraordinary items - - NOTES C and E 0 790 253
-------- -------- --------
NET INCOME (LOSS) $ (1,388) $ 3,885 $ 583
======== ======== ========
Per Share of Beneficial Interest- - NOTE A:
Operating income (loss) $ (0.40) $ 0.11 $ (0.02)
Net gains on sales of real estate 0.01 0.46 0.09
Gains on sales of securities 0.12 0.00 0.00
-------- -------- --------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS (0.27) 0.57 0.07
Extraordinary items 0.00 0.14 0.05
-------- -------- --------
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE $ (0.27) $ 0.71 $ 0.12
======== ======== ========
Weighted average number of Shares of
Beneficial Interest outstanding 5,186 5,459 4,959
======== ======== ========
See notes to financial statements.
F-4
89
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
Year ended September 30,
---------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------------ ------------ ------------
(in thousands)
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $(1,388) $ 3,885 $ 583
Non-cash revenues and expenses included in income:
Depreciation 1,830 1,846 1,972
Provision for valuation reserve 3,307 0 0
Decrease in accrued interest on notes payable (9) (4) (33)
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and
other liabilities (86) (134) 351
Increase in other assets (1,971) (80) (67)
Reconciliation to net cash flow from operating activities:
Net gains on sales of real estate (40) (2,499) (445)
Gains on sales of securities (632) 0 0
Extraordinary items 0 (790) (253)
------- ------- -------
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES 1,011 2,224 2,108
Cash flow from investing activities:
Equity investments:
Improvements to existing properties (972) (666) (853)
Purchase of property (3,465) 0 (3,918)
Proceeds from properties sold 1,386 5,545 879
Net insurance proceeds 0 738 253
Real estate mortgage loans:
Repayments 184 145 204
Investments in securities:
Securities purchased (2,057) (240) 0
Proceeds from sales of securities 2,929 0 0
------- ------- -------
NET CASH (USED IN) FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES (1,995) 5,522 (3,435)
Cash flow from financing activities:
Mortgage notes payable:
Principal amortization payments (203) (330) (496)
Principal repayments 0 (1,463) (7,689)
Principal borrowings 500 0 2,170
Bank notes payable:
Principal amortization payments 0 (31) (147)
Principal repayments 0 (4,549) (5,162)
Principal borrowings 3,200 0 7,689
Certificate of Deposit 0 500 0
Distributions to shareholders (1,037) (874) (735)
Shares issued pursuant to rights offerings 0 0 5,929
Shares repurchased and subsequently retired (174) (1,062) (296)
------- ------- -------
NET CASH FROM (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES 2,286 (7,809) 1,263
------- ------- -------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 1,302 (63) (64)
Balance at beginning of year 188 251 315
------- ------- -------
Balance at end of year $ 1,490 $ 188 $ 251
======= ======= =======
See notes to financial statements.
F-5
90
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
Years Ended September 30, 1996, 1995, and 1994
Shares Of Additional Unrealized Total
Beneficial Paid-In Accumulated Gains On Shareholders'
Interest Capital Deficit Securities Equity
------------ ------------- --------------- ------------ --------------
(in thousands)
Balance October 1, 1993 $ 3,716 $ 35,916 $(21,963) $ 0 $ 17,669
Net income for the year ended
September 30, 1994 583 583
Cash distributions declared
and paid -- $.15 per share (735) (735)
Shares issued pursuant to
rights offering -- NOTE G 1,858 4,071 5,929
Shares repurchased and
subsequently retired -- NOTE G (103) (193) (296)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Balance September 30, 1994 5,471 39,794 (22,115) 0 23,150
Net income for the year ended
September 30, 1995 3,885 3,885
Cash distributions declared
and paid -- $.16 per share (874) (874)
Shares repurchased and
subsequently retired -- NOTE G (254) (808) (1,062)
Change in unrealized gains
on securities 27 27
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Balance September 30, 1995 5,217 38,986 (19,104) 27 25,126
Net (loss) for the year ended
September 30, 1996 (1,388) (1,388)
Cash distributions declared
and paid -- $.20 per share (1,037) (1,037)
Shares repurchased and
subsequently retired -- NOTE G (38) (136) (174)
Change in unrealized gains
on securities (27) (27)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Balance September 30, 1996 $ 5,179 $ 38,850 $(21,529) $ 0 $ 22,500
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
F-6
91
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
Years Ended September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994
NOTE A - - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
CleveTrust Realty Investors is a business trust organized in the State of
Massachusetts, but with its headquarters in Ohio. The Trust's primary business
objective is the ownership and operation of improved real estate.
USE OF ESTIMATES: The preparation of financial statements requires Management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates and assumptions could change
in the future as more information becomes known, which could affect the amounts
reported and disclosed herein.
INCOME RECOGNITION: Rental income from improved properties is generally recorded
as it accrues. Interest on mortgage loans is recognized as income as it accrues
during the period the loans are outstanding except where collection of interest
is considered doubtful. Contingent rents and interest are recognized as income
when determinable. Accrual of income is suspended on any investment when the
collection of rent, principal, or interest is doubtful.
REAL ESTATE: In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
121 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed of," the Trust's properties are reported in the Trust's financial
statements at the lower of carrying value or estimated fair value, less cost to
sell. The Trust reviews long-lived assets whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. On September 24, 1996 the Trustees of the Trust unanimously voted
to recommend a Plan for the Orderly Liquidation of the Trust (the "Plan"). The
Plan, as proposed, would involve the sale of the Trust's properties during a
period of approximately three years. Based on the announcement the Trust has
reclassified all of its properties at September 30, 1996, in accordance with
SFAS No. 121, to Properties Held for Sale. A review of the carrying value of all
the properties at September 30, 1996 determined that four properties had a
carrying value higher than the estimated fair value, less cost to sell.
Therefore, a valuation reserve, which totals $3,307,000, was established for
these four properties to lower their carrying value to their estimated fair
value, less cost to sell. (See NOTE C for carrying values of each property)
Prior to the adoption by the Trust of SFAS No. 121, the Trust regularly
evaluated the recoverability of each investment in the portfolio. When
appropriate, an allowance for possible investment losses was provided for
properties acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosures. In
fiscal 1994 the Trust applied the allowance for possible investment losses to
three previously foreclosed properties for which it had been provided. The Trust
concluded that it was unlikely that the value of these properties would recover.
Therefore, they were written down to their net realizable value through
application of the allowance.
Real estate previously acquired by the Trust pursuant to normal real estate
purchase transactions was recorded at cost. Real estate acquired by foreclosure
or deed in lieu of foreclosure was recorded at estimated fair value at the date
of acquisition, but not in excess of the unpaid balance of the related loan plus
costs of securing title to and possession of the property.
DEPRECIATION: Depreciation on equity investments is computed by the
straight-line method at rates based upon the expected economic lives of the
assets which range from 31 to 40 years for buildings, 5 to 40 years for other
property and the specific length of the tenant lease for tenant improvements.
Additionally, one building and its permanent improvements are depreciated over a
life of 55 years. In accordance with the Plan, properties held for sale will not
be depreciated in Fiscal year 1997.
F-7
92
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - - CONTINUED
NOTE A - - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICES - - CONTINUED
REPAIRS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS: Expenditures for repairs and maintenance which
do not add to the value or prolong the useful life of property owned are charged
to expense as incurred; those expenditures for improvements which do add to the
value or extend the useful life are capitalized.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS : The Trust defines cash and cash equivalents as cash
in bank accounts and investments in marketable securities, primarily short-term
commercial paper with original maturities of three months or less.
INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES: At September 30, 1996 the Trust did not own any
equity securities. At September 30, 1995 the Trust classified its investments in
equity securities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 115 "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities," as
available for sale and as a result they were stated at their fair value. The
effect of the unrealized gains was included as a component of Shareholders'
Equity. Realized gains are calculated on an actual cost basis.
INCOME TAXES: Deferred income taxes are recognized for temporary differences
between the financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities and their
respective tax basis and for operating and capital loss and tax credit
carryforwards based on enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such
amounts are realized or settled. However, deferred tax assets are recognized
only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be realized
based on consideration of available evidence including tax planning strategies
and other factors. The effects of changes in tax laws or rates on deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized in the period that includes the enactment
date.
NET INCOME PER SHARE: Net income per Share of Beneficial Interest has been
computed using the weighted average number of Shares of Beneficial Interest
outstanding each year.
RECLASSIFICATION: Certain items in previously issued financial statements have
been reclassified to conform to 1996 presentations.
NOTE B - - INCOME TAXES
The Trust's deferred tax assets and liabilities at September 30, 1996 and 1995
are as follows:
1996 1995
------ ------
(in thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Properties held for sale - valuation reserve $ 1,124 $ -0-
Investments in real estate - write-downs -0- 1,752
Net operating and capital loss carryforwards 3,456 2,167
Other -0- 489
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation (1,489) (1,841)
Other (43) -0-
------- -------
3,048 2,567
Valuation allowance (3,048) (2,567)
------- -------
Net deferred tax asset/(liability) $ -0- $ -0-
======= =======
F-8
93
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - - CONTINUED
NOTE B - - INCOME TAXES - - CONTINUED
The Trust maintains a valuation reserve equal to its net deferred tax asset as
there is doubt as to whether the net deferred tax asset will be realized.
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996 the Trust had a net loss for tax
purposes and therefore had no income tax expense. Additionally, the Trust had no
income tax expense for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1995. A
reconciliation between the 1995 results and the amount of income tax expense
that would result from applying Federal statutory rates to pretax income is as
follows:
9/30/96 9/30/95
------- -------
(in thousands)
Expected income tax expense at
Federal statutory tax rate $ (472) $ 1,321
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
Effect of temporary differences (853) (535)
(Recognized) unrecognized net operating
loss carryforward 1,325 (786)
------- -------
Income Tax Expense $ -0- $ -0-
======= =======
At September 30, 1996 the Trust had, for federal tax purposes, net operating
loss and capital loss carryforwards of approximately $10.2 million. The use of
the net operating loss carryforwards is limited by Section 382 of the Internal
Revenue Code with effect for losses associated with years prior to December 28,
1992. Net capital loss carryforwards can only be utilized to the extent that net
capital gains are incurred during the next five year period. The Trust can use
approximately $ 298,000 per year of net operating loss carryforwards, plus gains
of the sales of properties ("built in gains"), plus any prior years' unused
portion (limited by carryforward periods) for losses generated prior to December
28, 1992. The Trust can also use carryforwards generated post December 28, 1992.
These carryforwards of approximately $9.5 million expire through 2011. The
remaining carryforwards of $700,000 may be recognized for a period through
fiscal 1998 against gains on sales of properties, if any , to the extent that
fair market values of these properties exceeded their tax bases as of December
28, 1992.
F-9
94
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - - CONTINUED
NOTE C - - PROPERTIES
The following is a summary of the Trust's properties held for sale and related
indebtedness at September 30, 1996:
Income from
Total Accumulated Valuation Carrying Real Estate Amount of
Classification Cost Depreciation Reserve Value Operations Indebtness
- - --------------------------- ---------------- --------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- ------------
(in thousands)
Office Buildings:
Englewood, Colorado $6,103 $3,108 $0 $2,995 $375 $0
Denver, Colorado 4,623 2,966 0 1,657 351 0
Littleton, Colorado 3,166 1,398 0 1,768 210 1,209
Tulsa, Oklahoma 6,959 4,408 551 2,000 10 0
Dallas, Texas 2,452 1,792 0 660 66 0
Dallas, Texas 11,048 3,502 2,546 5,000 (3) 0
Dallas, Texas 4,312 272 0 4,040 302 2,612
Arlington, Texas 2,208 24 0 2,184 78 0
---------------- --------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- ------------
40,871 17,470 3,097 20,304 1,389 3,821
Commercial Properties:
Hilton Head, S. C. 1,911 1,104 0 807 277 0
Austin, Texas 8,225 2,174 0 6,051 559 5,742
Davenport, Iowa 5,579 1,078 0 4,501 472 0
Dubuque, Iowa 5,367 1,174 0 4,193 447 0
Ardmore, Oklahoma 4,081 948 133 3,000 291 0
---------------- --------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- ------------
25,163 6,478 133 18,552 2,046 5,742
Land 117 0 77 40 (1) 0
---------------- --------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- ------------
Total of all properties $66,151 $23,948 $3,307 $38,896 $3,434 $9,563
================ =============== ============ ============= ============== ============
Following is a summary of activity with regards to the properties for the three
years ended September 30, 1996:
1996 1995 1994
--------------- ------------ -------------
(in thousands)
Balance, beginning of year $40,942 $45,380 $49,394
Improvements to existing properties 972 666 853
Purchase of properties 3,465 0 3,918
Sales of properties - NOTE D (1,346) (3,258) (724)
Valuation reserve (3,307) 0 0
Application of allowance for investment losses 0 0 (6,089)
Depreciation (1,830) (1,846) (1,972)
--------------- ------------ -------------
Balance, end of year $38,896 $40,942 $45,380
=============== ============ =============
F-10
95
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - - CONTINUED
NOTES C - - PROPERTIES - - CONTINUED
On February 20, 1996 the Trust completed the purchase of the land on which its
Englewood Bank Building is located. This land, which was previously leased by
the Trust, was purchased for a price of $1,263,000.
On March 28, 1996 the Trust purchased a 52,554 square foot suburban office
building located in Arlington, Texas for a purchase price of $2,202,000.
On August 26, 1994 the Trust purchased a 104,000 square foot office building
located in Dallas, Texas for $3,918,000. Of this amount $2,170,000 was provided
by a first mortgage loan on the property, which the Trust obtained at the time
of the purchase.
On January 18, 1994 the Trust's Petroleum Club Building located in Tulsa,
Oklahoma sustained a major fire. In July, 1994 the Trust and its insurance
company agreed on a settlement of $6,025,000. The Trust has completed all
necessary repairs and building improvements for an amount less than the
settlement. The Trust has recorded $738,000 as an extraordinary income item in
fiscal 1995. The cost of building improvements made as part of the building
restoration was $253,000 was capitalized and recorded as an extraordinary income
item in fiscal 1994.
NOTE D - - REAL ESTATE SALES
The fiscal 1996 net gains on sales of real estate totaling $40,000 include the
following: (i) $69,000 which represents the gain the Trust realized on its
January and February, 1996 sales of three condominium units located in Davie,
Florida for a combined sales price of $138,000; (ii) a loss of $313,000 the
Trust realized on its March, 1996 $600,000 sale of the European Crossroads
office/retail complex on 11.5 acres of land located in Dallas, Texas; (iii)
$23,000 represents the gain the Trust realized on its April, 1996 $115,000 sale
of 7.42 acres of vacant land located in Akron, Ohio; and (iv) $261,000
represents the gain the Trust realized on its September, 1996 $615,000 sale of
two of the five buildings comprising the Walnut Stemmons Office Park located in
Dallas, Texas.
The fiscal 1995 gains on sales of real estate totaling $2,499,000 include the
following: (i) $452,000 which represents the gain the Trust realized on its
February, 1995 $2,650,000 sale of the 197 room Quality Hotel located at the
airport in St. Louis, Missouri; (ii) $1,859,000 represents the gain the Trust
realized on its March, 1995 $2,595,000 sale of the 124 unit Parkwood Place
Apartments located in Greeley, Colorado; (iii) $97,000 represents the gain the
Trust realized on its March, 1995 $800,000 sale of the 51,000 square foot Walnut
Hill West office building located in Dallas, Texas; and (iv) $91,000 represents
the gain the Trust realized on its May, 1995 $212,000 sale of 17.7697 acres of
vacant land located in Akron, Ohio. The Trust received a purchase money mortgage
for the total $212,000 purchase price in connection with the sale.
The fiscal 1994 gains on sales of real estate totaling $445,000 include the
following: (i) $361,000 which represents the gain the Trust realized on its
March, 1994 $834,000 sale of 70 acres of vacant land located in Akron, Ohio. The
Trust received a purchase money mortgage for $290,000 of the purchase price in
connection with the sale; and (ii) $84,000 which represents the gain the Trust
realized on its August, 1994 $198,000 sale of 16.6 acres of vacant land located
in Akron, Ohio.
NOTE E - - MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE
At September 30, 1996 the mortgage notes payable of the Trust are non-recourse
mortgages except the first $750,000 of the $2,612,000 loan maturing August 19,
2000 which is recourse to the Trust. The following data pertains to the mortgage
notes payable as of September 30, 1996.
F-11
96
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - - CONTINUED
NOTE E - - MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE - - CONTINUED
Book Value
Of The
Investment
Mortgage Securing Base Interest
Notes Payable The Debt Maturity Rate
------------- ------ -------- -----
(in thousands)
$ 5,742 $ 6,051 May 7, 2002 8.300%
2,612 4,040 Aug. 19, 2000 8.300
1,209 1,768 July 1, 2003 8.125
-------- --------
$ 9,563 $ 11,859
======== ========
On October 7, 1996 the Trust completed the sale of the Littleton Bank building
located in Littleton, Colorado (see NOTE J). This property secured the above
listed $1,209,000 loan which was to mature July 1, 2003. This loan was repaid on
October 7, 1996 in connection with the sale of the property.
Required payments on the Trust's two remaining mortgage notes payable for the
succeeding five years are as follows:
Year Ending
September 30, Principal Interest Total
------------ --------- -------- -----
(in thousands)
1997 $ 221 $ 682 $ 903
1998 240 663 903
1999 260 643 903
2000 2,712 587 3,299
2001 252 396 648
Effective December 28, 1995 the Trust and its Lender modified the first mortgage
loan on the 14800 Quorum Office Building located in Dallas, Texas as follows:
The Trust borrowed an additional $500,000, which increased the outstanding
borrowings to $2,640,000 at the time of the transaction. Additionally, the
interest rate, which was 1.75% over the prime lending rate (9.5% at the time of
the modification) adjusted every two years, was changed to a fixed rate of 8.3%,
effective January 1, 1996, until the maturity date of August 19, 2000.
Effective September 1, 1996 the Trust and its Lender modified the first mortgage
loan on the Cannon West Shopping Center located in Austin, Texas as follows: The
interest rate was reduced from 9.5% to 8.3% and the maturity date was extended
five years from May 7, 1997 to May 7, 2002.
On March 16, 1995 the Trust repaid a $498,000 first mortgage loan on its
shopping center located in Ardmore, Oklahoma. This loan had a maturity date of
June 16, 1996. On May 1, 1995 the Trust settled at a discount, a $1,017,000
first mortgage loan on its office building located in Englewood, Colorado, which
had a maturity date of February 1, 1999. This settlement resulted in an
extraordinary income item of $52,000.
Total interest expense on mortgage notes payable did not differ materially from
interest paid.
F-12
97
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - - CONTINUED
NOTE F - - BANK NOTES PAYABLE
At September 30, 1996 the bank notes payable included $9,800,000 of borrowings
under the 1994 Credit Agreement. At September 30, 1995 the bank notes payable
included $6,600,000 of borrowings under the 1994 Credit Agreement.
Effective November 30, 1994 the Trust converted a September 30, 1994 $7,689,000
demand note to a revolving line of credit ("1994 Credit") issued by National
City Bank of Cleveland, Ohio ("NCB") and Manufacturer's and Traders Trust
Company of Buffalo, New York ("M&T"). The 1994 Credit is for up to $25,000,000
(but is limited by the value of the collateral provided). Of this amount a
maximum of $15,000,000 is currently available and $10,000,000 will be available
at the Trust's discretion upon payment of an activation fee of 3/4 of 1% on the
$10,000,000. The initial term of the 1994 Credit was three years. Each year the
lenders will review the 1994 Credit with the right to extend it for one
additional year. The lenders have extended the 1994 Credit to March 1, 1999.
Interest only payments, which is at the option of the Trust, will be at either
(i) 1/4 of 1% over the prime rate; (ii) 250 basis points over the LIBOR rate; or
(iii) NCB's fixed interest rate available from time to time. Additionally, a
commitment fee of 3/8 of 1% is due on any funds available but not borrowed. The
1994 Credit is secured by certain of the Trust's real estate investments and
contains certain covenants including a covenant for a minimum shareholders'
equity. At September 30, 1996 the amount of shareholders' equity free from such
restriction was approximately $2,500,000.
The Trust also had a loan with another bank which was scheduled to mature
December 25, 1993 but, had been extended to December 25, 1997. The interest rate
was prime plus 1% with a minimum rate of 7.5%. The Trust was required to make
monthly amortization payments based on a twenty-year amortization schedule. On
February 28, 1995 the Trust made a principal payment of $2,200,000 and on March
15, 1995 paid off the remaining balance of $1,260,000.
Total interest expense on bank notes payable did not differ materially from
interest paid.
NOTE G - - SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST
On December 7, 1995 the Trust repurchased 38,000 of its Shares of Beneficial
Interest for $174,000 in an open market purchase. These shares were retired by
the Trust.
On August 21, 1995 the Trust mailed an Offer to purchase for cash an aggregate
of 500,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest for a price of $4.00 per share to each
shareholder of the Trust. The Offer ended September 22, 1995 and at its
conclusion 239,553 shares were purchased and retired by the Trust. In addition
to the $4.00 per share the Trust incurred costs of $56,000 in connection with
the Offer.
On April 17, 1995 the Trust repurchased 14,000 of its Shares of Beneficial
Interest for $48,000 in an open market purchase. These shares were retired by
the Trust.
On June 26, 1994 the Trust repurchased 103,210 of its Shares of Beneficial
Interest for $296,000 in an open market purchase. These shares were retired by
the Trust.
On November 23, 1993 the Trust mailed a prospectus and certificate of rights to
all shareholders of record as of November 12, 1993. The certificates entitled
the shareholder to the right to purchase one Share of Beneficial Interest of the
Trust for every two Shares owned at a price of $3.25 per Share. Additionally,
this offering also provided for an oversubscription privilege which entitled
each holder of a right to subscribe for Shares not purchased by other holders of
rights. Oversubscriptions were allocated prorata based on the number of Shares
owned. The offering expired on January 28, 1994. All 1,857,969 Shares available
were sold. The net proceeds to the Trust totaled $5,929,000.
F-13
98
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - - CONTINUED
NOTE G - - SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST - - CONTINUED
On February 21, 1992 the shareholders of the Trust approved the amended and
extended 1983 Incentive Stock Option Plan, now titled the 1992 Stock Option Plan
("1992 Plan"). Under the 1992 Plan, an additional 200,000 Shares of Beneficial
Interest of the Trust are reserved and made available for issuance of options to
officers and employees of the Trust at the discretion of the Board of Trustees.
The original plan had reserved 100,000 Shares. The 1992 Plan is extended to
October 21, 2011. The option price is the fair market value on the date of the
grant and no option shall be exercisable for less than 100% of this value. Under
the 1992 Plan, the share appreciation rights granted previously will be
unaffected; however, no share appreciation rights will be issued with grants of
the 200,000 new Shares or the 17,500 Shares remaining from the original 100,000
Shares. Share appreciation rights entitle the holder to receive the difference
between the market value on the date of exercise and the option price in Shares,
cash or a combination thereof, at the discretion of the Board of Trustees.
In connection with the Trustees' Plan of Liquidation, the four primary officers
of the Trust have executed new employment contracts effective September 1, 1996.
As part of these contracts the officers waive all rights with respect to
unexercised options. In return, additional compensation will be paid to the
officers, based on a calculation of a minimum threshold of the distributions to
the Shareholders during the liquidation period. Such amounts will be expensed as
incurred.
NOTE H - - PENSION PLAN
The Trust has a defined contribution pension plan covering all full-time
employees of the Trust. Contributions are determined as a set percentage of each
covered employee's annual cash compensation. Contributions by the Trust are
accrued during the year and paid prior to the filing of the Trust's federal
income tax return for said year. For fiscal 1996 the Trust accrued $30,000 for
contributions to the pension plan (for fiscal 1995 - $24,000 and fiscal 1994 -
$31,000).
NOTE I - - OPERATING LEASES
Minimum future rentals due the Trust on noncancelable leases for the succeeding
five fiscal years and thereafter are as follows: 1997, $7,841,000; 1998,
$6,526,000; 1999, $5,324,000; 2000, $3,716,000; 2001, $2,777,000; and $9,214,000
thereafter. Certain leases provide for contingent rentals. The Trust received
$123,000 of contingent rentals for 1996 ($123,000 for 1995 and $131,000 for
1994). The Trust's carrying amount at September 30, 1996 of these real estate
investments consists of land of $7,547,000 and improvements of $58,487,000, less
accumulated depreciation of $23,948,000 and valuation reserve of $3,307,000.
NOTE J - - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On October 7, 1996 the Trust completed a $2,450,000 sale of the Littleton Bank
Building located in Littleton, Colorado. This sale resulted in a gain of
approximately $563,000 which will be reported in the first quarter of Fiscal
Year 1997.
F-14
99
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - - CONTINUED
NOTE K - - QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Summarized quarterly financial data for the years ended September 30, 1996 and
1995 is as follows:
Quarter Ended Dec. 31 Mar. 31 June 30 Sept. 30
- - ------------- ------- ------- ------- --------
(in thousands, except per share data)
1996
- - ----
Operating revenues $ 2,638 $ 2,657 $ 2,693 $ 2,657
Operating income (loss) 331 316 258 (2,965)
Net Income (loss) 331 72 281 (2,072)
Operating income (loss) per share (1) .06 .06 .05 (.57)
Net Income (Loss) per share (1) .06 .01 .06 (.40)
1995
- - ----
Operating revenues $ 2,666 $ 2,614 $ 2,486 $ 2,461
Operating income before
extraordinary item 67 94 255 180
Extraordinary item 0 0 52 738
Net income 67 2,502 398 918
Operating income per share before
extraordinary item (1) .01 .02 .05 .03
Extraordinary item per share(1) .12 .00 .02 .12
Net income (loss) per share (1) .01 .46 .08 .16
<FN>
(1) Per Share calculations for each of the quarters is based on a weighted
average number of shares outstanding for each period and, therefore, the
sum of the quarters may not necessarily equal full-year amounts.
F-15
100
SCHEULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
As of September 30, 1996
(In Thousands)
Amount at which carried at
Initial Cost to Trust September 30, 1996
--------------------------- Cost of ------------------------------------------
Description Encumbrances Land Improvements Improvements Land Improvements Total (1),(4)
-------------------------- --------------- ---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
Office Buildings:
Englewood Bank Bldg.
Englewood, CO $0 $1,263 $4,328 $512 $1,263 $4,840 $6,103
Executive Club Bldg
Denver, CO 0 165 2,834 1,624 165 4,458 4,623
Littleton Bank Bldg
Littleton, CO 1,209 0 2,738 428 0 3,166 3,166 (6)
Petroleum Club Bldg
Tulsa,OK 0 648 3,306 3,005 648 6,311 6,959 (3)
Walnut Stemmons Office Park
Dallas, TX 0 228 1,489 735 228 2,224 2,452
Office Alpha
Dallas, TX 0 1,500 8,439 1,109 1,500 9,548 11,048 (3)
14800 Quorum Bldg
Dallas, TX 2,612 335 3,583 394 335 3,977 4,312
Brookside Office Bldg
Arlington, TX 0 300 1,902 6 300 1,908 2,208
Commercial Properties:
Triangle Square
Hilton Head, SC 0 135 1,157 619 135 1,776 1,911
Cannon West
Austin, TX 5,742 874 6,758 593 874 7,351 8,225
Spring Village
Davenport, IA 0 1,013 4,373 193 1,013 4,566 5,579
Warren Plaza
Dubuque, IA 0 401 4,800 166 401 4,966 5,367
Tiffany Plaza
Ardmore, OK 0 684 2,847 550 684 3,397 4,081 (3)
Vacant Land
Akron, OH 0 117 0 0 117 0 117 (3)
---------------- -------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Totals $9,563 $7,663 $48,554 $9,934 $7,663 $58,488 $66,151
================ ====================================== =======================================
Accumulated Construction Date Depreciation
Description Depreciation (2) Completed Acquired Lives (5)
-------------------------- ------------------ -------------------------------------------
Office Buildings: (Various from)
Englewood Bank Bldg.
Englewood, CO $3,108 1970 1971 5 to 40 years
Executive Club Bldg
Denver, CO 2,966 1971 1972 5 to 40 years
Littleton Bank Bldg
Littleton, CO 1,398 1972 1973 5 to 55 years
Petroleum Club Bldg
Tulsa,OK 4,408 1963 1972 5 to 40 years
Walnut Stemmons Office Park
Dallas, TX 1,792 1971 1975 5 to 35 years
Office Alpha
Dallas, TX 3,502 1981 1983 5 to 40 years
14800 Quorum Bldg
Dallas, TX 272 1980 1994 5 to 40 years
Brookside Office Bldg
Arlington, TX 24 1986 1996 5 to 40 years
Commercial Properties:
Triangle Square
Hilton Head, SC 1,104 1975 1976 5 to 35 years
Cannon West
Austin, TX 2,174 1981 1987 5 to 40 years
Spring Village
Davenport, IA 1,078 1980 1987 5 to 40 years
Warren Plaza
Dubuque, IA 1,174 1980 1987 5 to 40 years
Tiffany Plaza
Ardmore, OK 948 1975 1989 10 to 31 years
Vacant Land
Akron, OH 0 N/A 1975 N/A
------------------
Totals $23,948
==================
F-16
101
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION - - CONTINUED
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
Year Ended September 30,
--------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
--------------- ------------ -------------
(1) Reconciliation of real estate:
Balance of real estate at October 1, 1995,
1994 and 1993, respectively $63,485 $71,028 $73,296
Additions during period:
Cost of Improvements 972 666 853
Purchase of Property 3,465 0 3,918
--------------- ------------ -------------
Total Additions 4,437 666 4,771
--------------- ------------ -------------
67,922 71,694 78,067
Application of allowance for investment losses 0 0 6,089
Less carrying amount of real estate sold
or disposed 1,771 8,209 950
--------------- ------------ -------------
Balance of real estate at September 30,
1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively $66,151 $63,485 $71,028
=============== ============ =============
(2) Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation:
Balance of accumulated depreciation at
October 1, 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively $22,543 $25,648 $23,902
Additions charged to expenses 1,830 1,846 1,972
--------------- ------------ -------------
24,373 27,494 25,874
Accumulated depreciation on real estate
sold or disposed 425 4,951 226
--------------- ------------ -------------
Balance of accumulated depreciation at
September 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively $23,948 $22,543 $25,648
=============== ============ =============
(3) On September 24, 1996 the Trustees of the Trust unanimously voted to
recommend a Plan for the Orderly Liquidation of the Trust (the "Plan"). Since
the Trust had previously adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
121 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Aseets to
be Disposed of" ("SFAS No. 121") the Trust, effective September 30, 1996,
classified all real estate owned as Property held for sale. In accordance with
this classification the Trust reviewed the fair value of all of its property.
The Trust has established a valuation reserve against four of its properties as
follows:
Petroleum Club Bldg - Tulsa OK $551,000
Office Alpha - Dallas, TX 2,546,000
Tiffany Plaza - Ardmore, OK 133,000
Vacant Land - Akron, OH 77,000
---------------
Total Valuation reserve $3,307,000
===============
(4) The Trust's aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes at September 30,
1996 was $66,263,000. The Trust's federal income tax return for the year ended
September 30, 1996 has not yet been filed.
(5) Depreciation lives exclude tenant improvements which are depreciated over
the specific lease term involved.
(6) At September 30, 1996 the Trust owned the building improvements subject to a
long term ground lease. On October 7, 1996 the Trust sold the improvements to
gound lease holder. The Trust will recognize a gain of approximately $563,000 in
the first quarter of the fiscal year ending September 30, 1997.
F-17
102
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
EXHIBIT INDEX
"Assigned" Location of
Exhibit No. * Description Exhibit
------------- ----------- -------
(3) (A) Second Amended and Restated Declaration Incorporated by
of Trust. reference to Exhibit
(3) to Registration
Statement on
Form S-2, File
Number, 33-46552.
(3) (B) By-Laws Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit
(3) to Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended
September 30, 1986.
(File No. 0-5641)
(4) (1) Credit Agreement By and Amoung CleveTrust Realty Incorporated by reference
Investors, Borrower, National City Bank, as Agent, to Exhibit (4) to Form
and The Banks Identified Herein dated as of 10-K for the fiscal year
November 30, 1994. ended September 30, 1994.
(4) (2) Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of April Incorporated by reference
28, 1995 to the Credit Agreement By and Amoung to Exhibit (4) to Form
CleveTrust Realty Investors, Borrower, National 10-K for the fiscal year
City Bank, as Agent, and The Banks Identified ended September 30, 1995.
Herein dated as of November 30, 1994.
(4) (3) Deed of Trust and Security Agreement made as of Incorporated by
May 28, 1987 between CleveTrust Realty Investors reference to Exhibit (4)
and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company. to Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1987.
(File No. 0-5641)
(4) (4) Promissory Note dated May 28, 1987 in the amount Incorporated by
of $6,500,000 with respect to the Deed of Trust reference to Exhibit (4)
and Security Agreement made as of May 28, 1987 to Report on Form 10-K
between CleveTrust Realty Investors and the for the fiscal year ended
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company September 30, 1987.
(File No. 0-5641)
Certain of the Registrant's assets are subject to
long-term mortgage obligations each of which
individually relates to indebtedness totaling less
than 10% of the total assets of the Registrant. The
Registrant hereby agrees to furnish a copy of such
agreements to the Commission upon its request.
103
CLEVETRUST REALTY INVESTORS
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
EXHIBIT INDEX
--(CONTINUED)--
"Assigned" Location of
Exhibit No. * Description Exhibit
------------- ----------- -----------
Exhibits (10) (1) through (10) (5) represent Management contracts or
compensation plans or arrangements.
(10) (1) Amended and Restated Employment Agreement Filed herewith
effective as of September 1, 1996 between electronically
CleveTrust Realty Investors and John C. Kikol.
(10) (2) Amended and Restated Employment Agreement Filed herewith
effective as of September 1, 1996 between electronically
CleveTrust Realty Investors and Michael R. Thoms.
(10) (3) Amended and Restated Employment Agreement Filed herewith
effective as of September 1, 1996 between electronically
CleveTrust Realty Investors and Raymond C. Novinc.
(10) (4) Amended and Restated Employment Agreement Filed herewith
effective as of September 1, 1996 between electronically
CleveTrust Realty Investors and Brian D.
Griesinger.
(10) (5) CleveTrust Realty Investors 1992 Incorporated by
Incentive Stock Option Plan. reference to Exhibit (10)
to Registration Statement
on Form S-2, File Number,
33-46552.
(11) Computation of net income (loss) per share of Filed herewith
beneficial interest. electronically
(23) Consent of Independent Auditors. Filed herewith
electronically
(24) Power of Attorney. Filed herewith
electronically
(27) Financial Data Schedule. Filed herewith
electronically
<FN>
* Exhibits 2, 9, 12, 13, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22, and 28 are either inapplicable to
the Trust or require no answer.
104
Consent of Independent Auditors
We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated November 15,
1996, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of CleveTrust Realty
Investors included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K / A) for the year ended
September 30, 1996 in the following:
Registration Statement Number 33-12663 on Form S-8 dated March 23,
1987;
Registration Statement Number 33-12662 on Form S-3 dated March 23,
1987;
Amendment Number 2 to Registration Statement Number 33-69238 on Form
S-2 dated November 12, 1993;
Amendment Number 1 to Registration Statement Number 33-12662 on Form
S-3 dated December 1, 1987; and
Post-Effective Amendment Number 1 to Registration Statement Number 2-
97843 on Form s-8 dated March 23, 1987.
Ernst & Young LLP
January 28, 1997
Cleveland, Ohio
Exhibit 23