SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark one)
[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended: December 31, 1998
[ ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the
transition period from __________ to __________
Commission File Number: 0-19179
CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
North Carolina 56-1837282
-------------- ----------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
incorporation or organization
68 Cabarrus Avenue, East, Concord, North Carolina 28025
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (704) 722-2500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class: Name of exchange on which registered:
-------------------- -------------------------------------
None None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock
Rights to Purchase Common Stock
Indicate by check mark whether the Company (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the Company was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes X No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form
10-K. [ ]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the Company is approximately
$343,544,640 (based on the March 12, 1999 closing price of the Common Stock of $40.00 per share). As of March
12, 1999, there were 9,381,049 shares of the Company's Common Stock outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Document of the Company Form 10-K Reference Location
----------------------- ----------------------------
Certain portions of the PARTS I and II
Annual Report to Shareholders for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998
1999 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement PART III
1
CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 1998
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1. Business................................................................................................3
Item 2. Properties.............................................................................................15
Item 3. Legal Proceedings......................................................................................17
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders....................................................17
Item 4A. Executive Officers of the Company......................................................................17
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Company's Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters.................................18
Item 6. Selected Financial Data................................................................................20
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations..................................................................................21
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.............................................29
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data............................................................30
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure.............................................................................................30
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Company........................................................30
Item 11. Executive Compensation.................................................................................30
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.........................................30
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.........................................................31
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K .......................................31
PART I
Item 1. Business
The following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements
that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in the forward- looking statements. Words such as
"expects," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," variations of such words and
other similar expressions are intended to identify such forward- looking
statements. Information concerning certain factors that could impact expected
results is included in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations-- Forward-Looking Statements."
General. CT Communications, Inc. (the "Company") is a holding
company providing telecommunications services and communications systems and
products through seven principal operating subsidiaries, each of which is wholly
owned: The Concord Telephone Company ("CTC"); CTC Long Distance Services, Inc.
("CTC LDS"); Carolina Personal Communications, Inc. (doing business as "CT
Wireless, Inc.") ("CPC"); CT Wireless Cable, Inc. ("CT Wireless Cable"); CTC
Exchange Services, Inc. ("CTC Exchange"); CT Global Telecommunications, Inc.
("CTGT"); and CTC Internet Services, Inc. ("CTC Internet"). The Company also
owns various minority interests in telecommunications companies through two
subsidiaries--CT Communications Northeast Trust ("CTC Trust") and CT Cellular,
Inc. ("CT Cellular").
CTC provides local and toll telephone service and network access
services in a territory covering approximately 705 square miles in Cabarrus,
Stanly and Rowan Counties, North Carolina (the "CTC Service Area"). CTC LDS
provides long distance telephone service to residential and business subscribers
throughout the CTC Service Area, as well as in various other markets surrounding
the CTC Service Area. CPC manages the Company's ongoing efforts to operate a
personal communication service ("PCS") system. CPC also markets and sells PCS
services in a specified Major Trading Area on behalf of BellSouth Carolinas PCS
Limited Partnership (the "BellSouth Partnership"). CT Wireless Cable holds the
Company's interest in Wireless One of North Carolina, LLC ("WONC"), a limited
liability company formed to provide wireless cable television service in North
Carolina. CTC Exchange provides local telephone service in small- to
medium-sized markets beyond the CTC Service Area. CTGT holds an approximate 16%
equity interest in, and provides certain management services to, Amaritel, S.A.
de C.V. (doing business as "Maxcom"), a Mexican entity that proposes to provide
telephone services in Mexico. Finally, CTC Internet provides internet access and
related services to business and residential subscribers throughout the CTC
Service Area and in Charlotte, Greensboro and Raleigh, North Carolina.
The operations of CTC are the Company's primary business segment.
CTC accounted for approximately 77% of the Company's operating revenues and
approximately 94% of the Company's operating profit in 1998. Despite the
anticipated growth of other products and services offered by the Company, as
described below, the Company anticipates that CTC will continue to account for a
significant portion of the Company's earnings in 1999. Certain business,
financial and competitive information about the Company and CTC is discussed
below.
For certain other information regarding operating segments, see the Note
entitled "Segment
3
Information" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 1999
Annual Report, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Effective January 28, 1999, the Company's Voting Common Stock and
Class B Nonvoting Common Stock were converted into a single class of Common
Stock (the "Recapitalization"). Pursuant to the Recapitalization, the Company's
Articles of Incorporation were amended to (i) provide for one class of Common
Stock, consisting of 100 million authorized shares, and (ii) reclassify each
issued and outstanding share of Voting Common Stock into 4.4 shares of Common
Stock and each issued and outstanding share of Class B Nonvoting Common Stock
into 4.0 shares of Common Stock. Cash was paid in lieu of issuing any fractional
shares. All share and per share amounts in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have
been adjusted to reflect the Recapitalization, unless otherwise indicated.
The Company is incorporated under the laws of North Carolina and was
organized in 1993 pursuant to the corporate reorganization of CTC into a holding
company structure. At December 31, 1998, the Company and its subsidiaries had
total consolidated assets of $183.6 million and had 503 employees. The Company
has its principal executive offices at 68 Cabarrus Avenue East, Concord, North
Carolina 28205 (telephone number: 704-722-2500).
Legislative and Regulatory Developments. The Company's business
continued to undergo significant changes during 1998. These changes are
primarily the result of the Company's efforts to take advantage of fundamental
statutory, regulatory and technological developments currently taking place in
the telecommunications industry.
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the "Telecom Act") was enacted
on February 8, 1996. The Telecom Act mandates significant changes in existing
regulation of the telecommunications industry to promote competitive development
of new service offerings, to expand public availability of telecommunications
services and to streamline regulation of the industry.
The Telecom Act provides that implementing its legislative
objectives will be the task of the Federal Communications Commission (the
"FCC"), the state public utilities commissions and a federal-state joint board.
Simultaneous proceedings are in process to address issues and proposals already
before the FCC in pending rule making proceedings. Two significant proceedings
currently in process relate to access charge reform and universal service. The
results of such proceedings and the timing of implementation is uncertain at
this time, and the Company cannot currently estimate the impact of such
proceedings on its business or results of operations.
The primary purpose and effect of the new law is to open all
telecommunications markets to competition--including local telephone service.
The Telecom Act makes all state and local barriers to competition unlawful,
whether they are direct or indirect. It directs the FCC to hold notice and
comment proceedings and to preempt all inconsistent state and local laws and
regulations.
4
Each state retains the power to impose "competitively neutral"
requirements that are both consistent with the Telecom Act's universal service
provision and necessary for universal service, public safety and welfare,
continued service quality and consumer rights. Although a state may not impose
requirements that effectively function as barriers to entry or create a
competitive disadvantage, the scope of state authority to maintain existing or
adopt new requirements under this section is not clearly spelled out. In
addition, before it preempts a state or local requirement as violating the entry
barrier prohibition, the FCC must hold a notice and comment proceeding.
The FCC is required to forbear from applying any statutory or
regulatory provision that is not necessary to keep telecommunications rates and
terms reasonable or to protect consumers. A state may not apply a statutory or
regulatory provision that the FCC decides to forbear from applying. In addition,
the FCC must review its telecommunications regulations every two years and
repeal or modify any that it deems no longer necessary in the public interest.
The Telecom Act establishes a general duty of all telecommunications
carriers to interconnect with other carriers. Congress has also developed a
detailed list of requirements with respect to the interconnection obligations of
local exchange carriers ("LECs"). These interconnection obligations include
resale, number portability, dialing parity, access to rights-of-way and
reciprocal compensation.
LECs that are designated "incumbents" ("ILECs") have additional
obligations: to negotiate in good faith; to interconnect on terms that are
reasonable and non-discriminatory; to provide non-discriminatory access to
"facilities, equipment, features, functions and capabilities" on an unbundled
basis so that they can be combined in a manner that a requesting
telecommunications carrier sees fit; to offer for resale at wholesale rates any
service that LECs provide on a retail basis and not subject to unreasonable or
discriminatory conditions; and to provide actual collocation of equipment
necessary for interconnection or access.
The Telecom Act establishes a framework for state commissions to
mediate and arbitrate negotiations between ILECs and carriers requesting
interconnection, services or network elements. The Telecom Act establishes
deadlines, policy guidelines for state commission decision making and recourse
to the FCC in the event a state commission fails to act.
In addition to opening up local exchange markets, the Telecom Act
contains provisions for (i) updating and expanding telecommunications service
guarantees, (ii) removing certain restrictions relating to AT&T former operating
companies resulting from the antitrust consent decree issued by the federal
courts in 1984, (iii) the entry of telephone companies into video services, (iv)
the entry of cable television operators into other telecommunications
industries, (v) changes in the rules for ownership of broadcasting and cable
television operations, and (vi) changes in the regulations governing cable
television.
In 1996, the FCC adopted a number of interconnection obligations
that require LECs to provide physical or virtual collocation of equipment
necessary for interconnection, as well as a technically feasible method of
interconnection requested by a competitive telephone service
5
provider. LECs are also obligated to enter into reciprocal cost-based
compensation arrangements with competitive service providers for the transport
and termination of "local" traffic. If the LEC refuses to enter into such an
agreement with a competitor, the competitor may require the state government to
serve as an arbitrator. The FCC also adopted specific methodologies to determine
resale discounts and pricing for unbundled network elements in transactions
between incumbent LECs and competing service providers. The FCC's new
interconnection rules are currently being challenged in court by several LECs
and state regulatory authorities, and the outcome of those challenges cannot be
predicted.
On January 25, 1999, the United States Supreme Court concluded that
the FCC has exclusive jurisdiction to implement the competitive interconnection
provisions of the Telecom Act. This resulted in a shift in supervision and
control over the transition to competition from state regulatory agencies to the
FCC. It is too early to predict the impact of this decision on the Company. It
is likely that FCC supervision will result in greater uniformity in the approach
applied to the terms of interconnection agreements between competitors. However,
the decision may adversely impact smaller telecommunication providers, such as
the Company, because states may be better able than the FCC to understand and
react to local conditions.
On February 25, 1999, the FCC issued a declaratory rule that dial-up
calls to Internet service providers are interstate calls for purposes of
determining compensation for carriers that terminate such calls. Previously, 29
states, including North Carolina, have ruled that such calls are local and,
therefore, are subject to the reciprocal compensation provisions of local
network interconnection agreements. However, the FCC stated that its ruling does
not overturn these states' decisions. The FCC has tentatively concluded that
parties may negotiate such compensation arrangements or have them arbitrated by
state regulators under the Telecom Act. Competitive local exchange carriers
("CLECs") generally benefit from the states' position, while ILECs are expected
to request that states reverse their position in light of the new FCC rule. The
Company cannot predict the outcome of this regulatory development, but does not
expect it to have a materially adverse effect on the Company.
Although certain interpretive issues under the Telecom Act have not
yet been resolved, it is apparent that the requirements of the Telecom Act have
led to increased competition among providers of local telecommunications
services and have simplified the process of switching from ILEC services to
those offered by competitive access providers and CLECs. In light of the
foregoing, the Company continued its efforts in 1998 to improve its competitive
position in the local telephone service business and to take advantage of
opportunities that are developing with other emerging telecommunications
technologies.
Competition. The telecommunications industry is highly competitive.
Customers increasingly desire new services and new technologies and regulatory
reform and business alliances are accelerating the rate of change in the
industry, creating intense competition.
The Company faces competitors in virtually every aspect of its
business, including from regional holding companies, long distance service
providers, cable television companies, internet service providers, wireless
service providers, CLECs, switchless resellers and satellite carriers.
6
In the second quarter of 1998, the Company entered into interconnection
agreements with Time Warner Communications of North Carolina, L.P. and US LEC of
North Carolina, LLC, pursuant to which the Company now provides access to its
local telephone service market, as mandated by the Telecom Act and the Rate Plan
(discussed below). This is expected to create significant competitive pressure
regarding the Company's largest business customers. Competition also has
increased significantly among PCS providers. Sprint began PCS service in several
North Carolina metropolitan areas in 1998. PCS competition has led to intense
pressure on the pricing of services, and prices have declined significantly
recently. Several providers introduced "flat rate" pricing in 1998, which
eliminated roaming charges and further reduced prices.
In addition, in early 1999, AT&T and Time Warner entered into a
joint venture to offer AT&T-branded cable telephony service to residential and
small business customers over Time Warner's existing cable television systems in
33 states. The two companies expect to begin broad operations in 2000, to
jointly market communications services and to develop other broadband
communications services. The joint venture, along with other AT&T acquisitions,
reportedly will enable AT&T to reach more than 40% of U.S. households over the
next four or five years. This joint venture may eventually compete directly with
the Company.
Many of the Company's competitors have substantially greater
financial, personnel, technical, marketing and other resources, larger numbers
of customers, more prominent name recognition and utilize more extensive
transmission networks than the Company. The Company competes primarily on the
basis of customer service, reliability, variety of product offerings,
transmission quality and price. The ability of the Company to continue to
compete effectively will depend on its ability to maintain high quality service
and products at prices equal to or below those charged by its competitors.
THE CONCORD TELEPHONE COMPANY
General. CTC, the Company's principal subsidiary, was originally
organized in 1897 and provides local telephone and intra-LATA (Local Access and
Transport Area) toll service, access service to other carriers, and telephone
and equipment sales and leasing to customers residing primarily in Cabarrus,
Stanly and Rowan Counties in North Carolina. As of December 31, 1998, CTC served
109,147 access lines within the CTC Service Area. This figure represents a 6.4 %
increase from December 31, 1997.
To support the ongoing growth in the CTC Service Area, CTC invested
more than $7 million in circuit and digital switching technology. In addition,
the Company expanded the total fiber network in 1998 to more than 11,000 fiber
miles. In addition, CTC continued implementing state-of-the-art Nortel DMS
digital switching equipment as its next generation switching platform.
Implementation began in 1997 and is expected to continue for approximately three
to five years.
CTC is empowered by provisions of the North Carolina Public
Utilities Law and its Articles of Incorporation to construct and maintain its
lines and is authorized by the North Carolina Utilities Commission to operate
the territory that CTC now serves. In addition, CTC
7
has municipal franchises for constructing and maintaining its lines in the
Cities of Albemarle, Badin, China Grove, Concord, Harrisburg, Kannapolis,
Landis, Mt. Pleasant, New London, Oakboro and Richfield, North Carolina.
New Rate Plan. On September 1, 1997, CTC implemented a price
regulation rate plan (the "Rate Plan") approved by the North Carolina Utilities
Commission ("NCUC") pursuant to which CTC is now regulated based on prices
rather than traditional rate base rate of return regulation. As a result of the
Rate Plan, the rates charged by CTC for local, state access and toll plans are
controlled by the parameters specified by the NCUC in the Rate Plan.
A driving force behind the Rate Plan is customer demand for expanded
calling options to areas beyond their home communities. The Rate Plan expanded
the area in which customers can call without paying long distance charges by
including all of CTC's exchanges in its toll-free area. The Rate Plan also
expanded CTC's metro area, which already included Charlotte, to include
Matthews, Huntersville, Davidson and other surrounding communities. A
residential customer now may select one of four metro calling packages, which
provide a flat monthly fee (ranging from no charge to $24.00) for specified
monthly minutes of use (ranging from 30 minutes to unlimited minutes). The
customer may pay $.10 per minute for usage in excess of the monthly purchased
amounts. In addition, the Rate Plan eliminated the separate charge for
touch-tone calling and reduced charges for long-distance calls into a broader
calling zone that extends into Western North Carolina.
Under the rate structure implemented under the Rate Plan, CTC's
residential customers, except those in the Harrisburg exchange, now pay $10.50
per month for basic local service, including touch-calling. Harrisburg customers
now pay a slightly higher charge of $12.00 per month because these customers are
able to call more customers under that community's basic plan. Under the prior
rate structure, CTC's residential customers paid approximately $7.00 per month
for basic local service, plus a separate charge of $.50 per month for
touch-calling. Under the Rate Plan, the Company may rebalance rates to keep
prices in line with underlying costs. Residential rates are frozen until
September 2000, at which time the Company may begin rebalancing residential
rates.
Although the new rate structure reflects an increased charge for
basic service, other changes in the Rate Plan offset these increases for many
customers. The new rate structure did not materially impact the Company's
revenues in 1998 and is not expected to materially impact revenues in 1999 or
future years.
Under the North Carolina H.B. 161, "An Act to Provide the Public
with Access to Low- Cost Telecommunication Service in a Changing Competitive
Environment" (the "NC Act"), which took effect in July 1996, telephone companies
are given the option to file for price regulation. In exchange for greater
flexibility in setting prices, however, local telephone companies must agree to
open their markets to competition for local dial tone service -- the last area
of telecommunications services to be deregulated. Although the Rate Plan
requires that CTC open its markets to competition for local dial-tone services,
management believes CTC can compete in emerging markets by rebalancing rates and
still sustain local rates that are affordable.
8
As a result of the effectiveness of the Rate Plan, CTC is no longer
regulated according to a traditional rate base rate of return scheme of
regulation. CTC continues to be considered a Rural Telephone Company as defined
in the Telecom Act.
CTC LONG DISTANCE SERVICES, INC.
Organized in 1992, CTC LDS is engaged in the business of purchasing
long distance capacity in bulk from interexchange carriers and reselling it to
subscribers on a retail basis.
In 1993, CTC offered its customers equal access to the interexchange
(long distance) carriers who elected to market their services in the CTC Service
Area. This enables customers to preselect their carrier and to use this carrier
by dialing 1. CTC LDS received the largest number of selections in the balloting
process and has retained more than half of CTC's customers. However, these
customers are typically the smaller toll users, and CTC LDS bills less than half
of the total originating minutes of long distance used by customers in the CTC
Service Area. CTC LDS is actively seeking new methods to increase its market
share and make new products available to its customers, including expanding
service outside its traditional service area. CTC LDS was successful in these
efforts in 1998, as it added more than 3,239 new lines for a total of 72,578.
Management expects the easy-to-understand, competitively-priced, long-distance
plans offered by CTC LDS will continue to attract new customers to CTC LDS in
1999. During 1996, CTC LDS successfully introduced the new CTC Calling Card,
which the Company believes has enhanced CTC LDS's ongoing efforts to market and
sell long distance services.
During 1996, CTC LDS purchased and installed a Nortel DMS 500 switch
at a cost of $2.2 million. This switch is located in the downtown area of
Charlotte, and its purchase is indicative of the Company's commitment to
increase market presence by offering services outside of its traditional market
area. The addition of the Nortel DMS 500 switch makes CTC LDS a facilities based
interexchange carrier in North Carolina.
In 1997, CTC LDS received regulatory approval to market long
distance telephone service in the surrounding states of Georgia, South Carolina,
Tennessee and Virginia. However, CTC LDS concentrated its efforts in 1997 and
1998 on expanding its operations in the North Carolina counties contiguous to
its current five-county service area and proposes to expand concentrically from
that area in 1999. CTC LDS does not expect to have significant operations
outside of the Carolinas in 1999.
The Telecom Act is not expected to have an immediate impact on CTC
LDS because it addresses competition in the local service area of operations. In
the future, however, a Regional Bell Operating Company may be able to offer long
distance service to CTC LDS customers. This effectively exposes the long
distance service to additional competitive pressures. CTC LDS' principal methods
of responding to competitive pressures in the long distance telephone service
market include its ability to maintain aggressive marketing initiatives and its
ability to provide simple pricing plans, high quality customer service, robust
product and service lines, easy to understand pricing and accurate bills.
9
CTC EXCHANGE SERVICES, INC.
CTC Exchange Services was organized on January 23, 1997 and began
operations in the fourth quarter of 1997. This business unit was created to
enable CTC to offer local telephone service to markets beyond the CTC Service
Area.
In September 1997, CTC Exchange Services entered into an
interconnection agreement with BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. ("BellSouth")
allowing CTC Exchange Services to access BellSouth's facilities and equipment,
for a fee, in order to provide local telephone service in all of BellSouth's
serving areas in North Carolina. CTC Exchange Services began limited operations
in December 1997, primarily for the purpose of testing its processes, facilities
and equipment. Current operations consist primarily of resale of BellSouth's
existing products and services.
The Company is expanding incrementally from CTC Service Area into
adjacent markets. CTC Services began marketing its services in the second
quarter of 1998 in Salisbury, northern Charlotte and Statesville, North Carolina
and continues to evaluate new markets in which to expand beyond those areas. CTC
Services' business strategy focuses on providing facility based services to
small and medium-sized businesses in these service areas. Services include local
and long distance telephone service. To that end, the Company has expanded its
DMS 500 switching equipment to include local switching. Although CTC Services
continued in 1998 to offer local telephone service generally in certain markets
outside the CTC Service Area on a resale basis through its BellSouth
interconnection agreement, such resale services are expected to be de-
emphasized in 1999 and beyond.
CTC Services sold over 2,000 lines in 1998. CTC Exchange Services
expects its capital needs in 1999 to be between $4 million and $5 million and
expects losses in 1999 to be not more than $2 million.
CAROLINA PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
In 1994, the Company purchased a limited partnership interest in
BellSouth Carolinas PCS Limited Partnership. The BellSouth Partnership's
business is to design, develop, construct and operate a personal communication
system in a specified Major Trading Area ("MTA") and to market and provide PCS
services in the MTA. As a limited partner, the Company's investment includes the
Company's pro rata share of the license fee and expenditures to construct the
system. The Company owns 1.95% of the BellSouth Partnership, which interest is
held by CTC.
PCS is a digital wireless telecommunications service. New PCS
devices incorporate various communications methods in a single device, including
voice, data interface and paging. With PCS, a user is able to customize their
telecommunications service to best suit their particular requirements. The cost
of this new service to the customer is competitive with cellular technology.
However, like cellular telephone service, capital requirements are substantial
and aggressive marketing is necessary.
10
On March 31, 1995, the BellSouth Partnership received a 30 MHZ PCS
license from the FCC covering North Carolina and South Carolina (MTA 006). AT&T
Wireless purchased a second 30 MHZ PCS license for the same MTA in the March
1995 FCC auction and began offering PCS services in major markets, including MTA
006, during 1997. The FCC completed the auction of licenses for PCS services in
1997. This sale of spectrum to additional PCS providers, combined with
competition from cellular providers, has resulted in competition from six
wireless competitors in the general Charlotte, North Carolina market. In the
face of such competitive pressures, CPC's principal methods of competition
include its ability to provide extensive geographical coverage, high quality
technology and service, competitive pricing, as well as CPC's ability to
capitalize on the strength of customers' loyalty to other well-known partners in
the BellSouth Partnership, such as BellSouth, Duke Power and Carolina Power and
Light.
Funding of the BellSouth Partnership's operations began in the
second quarter of 1995, and during 1995 the Company invested approximately $3.9
million in the BellSouth Partnership. The Company invested an additional $2.8
million, $1.1 million and $1.0 million in 1996, 1997, and 1998, respectively.
Its 1999 commitments are approximately $565,500, and its 2000 commitments are
approximately $89,700. Construction of towers and transmitters began during
1996, and PCS service was first offered to the public by the Bell Partnership in
July 1996.
The Company experienced pre-tax losses in 1996, 1997 and 1998 of
$1.8 million, $2.9 million, and $2.9 million, respectively, due to expected
start-up costs. Losses associated with such start-up costs are currently
projected to continue through 1999. Such projections are based on estimates of
how long it will take to attract enough customers to cover start-up and
operating expenses associated with the PCS network. Notwithstanding such losses,
the Company believes the long-term outlook for PCS is positive.
Each telephone company limited partner in the BellSouth Partnership
has the option to partition its pre-defined service area. The Company's service
area consists of Cabarrus, Stanly, Rowan and parts of Iredell Counties in North
Carolina (the "PCS Service Area"). Partitioning will involve CTC (the current
holder of the partition option) purchasing the license for the PCS Service Area
and any assets, including customers of the BellSouth Partnership, in place
within that area at a purchase price expected to be between $15 million and $18
million, payable in full on the date of partition. BellSouth is expected to
offer the Company the right to partition in the second quarter of 1999. The
Company would then have up to twelve months in which to exercise its right to
partition, if it so chooses. If it so elects, the Company expects to pay the
partition fee by borrowing against current lines of credit. However, there can
be no assurance that the Company will elect to exercise its partition right.
Following partition, if any, CPC would operate as a provider of PCS products and
services within the PCS Service Area. At the time of partitioning, CPC's PCS
network will be substantially built out throughout the PCS Service Area.
During 1996, CPC opened retail outlets to sell PCS telephones in
Concord and Statesville, a third store began operations in Salisbury, North
Carolina during the first quarter of
11
1997, and a fourth store is expected to open in the fourth quarter of 1999. PCS
telephones are also being marketed and sold through CTC's offices.
CT WIRELESS CABLE, INC.
On October 9, 1995, the Company organized CT Wireless Cable as a
wholly owned subsidiary to participate in the wireless cable television market
in North Carolina. CT Wireless Cable owns approximately 49% of Wireless One of
North Carolina L.L.C. ("WONC"). WONC was formed to develop and launch wireless
cable systems in North Carolina. In October 1995, WONC entered into contracts
with approximately 45 community colleges in North Carolina to provide wireless
cable services in connection with leases between the schools and the FCC
pertaining to certain educational channel rights within North Carolina.
Beginning in 1996, WONC has regularly participated as a bidder in Multi Channel
Multipoint Distribution Service ("MMDS") auctions and has been awarded MMDS
channels in several markets throughout North Carolina. WONC plans to obtain
additional channels in 1999.
During January 1997, WONC and the University of North Carolina
("UNC") Center for Public Television entered into a contract granting WONC the
exclusive rights to lease UNC's 40 granted channel frequencies, as well as
frequencies to be granted pursuant to UNC's pending applications with the FCC
(the "UNC Lease Agreement"). In consideration for the UNC channel leasing
rights, WONC paid UNC $2.5 million upon execution of the UNC Lease Agreement, as
well as a $500,000 advance on future royalty payments to be paid to UNC. Royalty
payments are based on fees developed for the various markets served and applied
to subscriber accounts. The UNC Lease Agreement is a key component of WONC's
efforts to implement a statewide system of wireless cable television
programming, and this contract improves WONC's competitive position in the North
Carolina wireless cable television market. Wireless One, Inc. has estimated that
the channel frequencies represented by all of the channel rights controlled by
WONC, including the UNC channel rights, enable WONC to reach a total of 3
million line of site households in 13 markets throughout North Carolina.
Wireless cable uses microwave technology to deliver line of sight
transmission from a central broadcast tower to a receiver at the customer's
premise. It is expected to be a lower cost competitor to traditional hardwired
cable systems. With respect to direct broadcast satellite services that are
currently being marketed to consumers, wireless cable with digitalization will
offer a comparable number of channels and digital audio and picture quality, and
will also have the advantage of offering local programming. There can be no
assurance, however, that consumers will choose to subscribe for wireless cable
service instead of hardwired cable or direct broadcast satellite television
services.
In 1997, BellSouth launched digital wireless cable systems in New
Orleans, Orlando and Atlanta. The digital system offers more than 100 channels
of high quality digital video and audio. In addition, during 1997 several
wireless cable operators announced high-speed Internet services using wireless
cable frequencies. WONC launched its high-speed Internet service in Jackson,
Mississippi in the first quarter of 1998. In the fourth quarter of 1998, the FCC
issued
12
an order allowing WONC to expand the use of wireless cable frequencies
for telephony and two-way data services.
WONC continuously evaluates potential uses of its frequency
spectrum, including digital video, high speed Internet and other traditional
telephony services. The Company's capital requirements in connection with its
WONC investment were $1.4 million in 1996, $3.2 million in 1997, and $800,000 in
1998. Additional capital requirements associated with the WONC network are
expected to be approximately $1 million in 1999.
CT GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
In 1997, the Company acquired an 80% interest (increased to 100% in
March 1998) in CTGT, which holds the Company's equity interest in Maxcom
(formerly named Amaritel). Maxcom was formed early in 1997 for the purpose of
constructing and operating domestic and international long-distance services, as
well as local telephone services. Its primary geographic focus is on the Gulf of
Mexico, Mexico City and Puebla. Maxcom expects to use a wide spectrum of
technology, ranging from microwave to wired fiber distribution networks.
Build-out of the system is expected to be approximately 300,000 lines over a
five-year period, and Maxcom expects to begin offering commercial services in
Mexico City and Puebla, Mexico in the second quarter of 1999.
Maxcom has entered into a $100 million bank credit facility with
Nissho Iwai, which Maxcom intends to use to fund a portion of its facilities
build-out and operations. The credit facility is secured in part by the Maxcom
common stock held by CTGT, but is not otherwise secured or guaranteed by CTGT or
the Company. In 1998, Maxcom also raised approximately $50 million of additional
equity capital. In addition, CTGT provided approximately $1.6 million of
additional capital to Maxcom in 1998. CTGT now owns approximately 16% of the
equity securities of Maxcom.
CTGT entered into an Operating Agreement with Maxcom pursuant to
which it provides personnel and other services for the purpose of supervising
and advising Maxcom on its day-to-day operations (e.g., network operation and
maintenance, customer billing, sales and marketing, customer service, general
administration and management). Under the Operating Agreement, CTGT is
reimbursed for its expenses incurred in providing management services. In
addition, CTGT may receive a management fee of up to $900,000 per year and
options to acquire up to 250,000 shares of Maxcom common stock if certain
performance goals are met. The Operating Agreement is for a three-year term,
expiring in 2001, subject to a one-year extension in the discretion of Maxcom's
shareholders. The fees paid to CTGT under the Operating Agreement are expected
to offset CTGT's expenses related to providing those services.
CTGT was originally 80% owned by the Company and 20% owned by US
Telecom Holdings, Inc. ("US Telecom"). On March 31, 1998, CTGT acquired and
canceled the CTGT shares held by US Telecom, which resulted in CTGT becoming a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The $1.4 million purchase price was paid
through the cancellation of a note in principal amount of $800,000 previously
owed by US Telecom to the Company and the delivery
13
of cash. The Company has an additional note receivable from US Telecom in the
principal amount of $1,513,500, which is secured by a first priority interest in
4,950.50 shares of Telco Investors II, Inc. owned by US Telecom and is due April
1, 1999. CTGT believes that the note is adequately collateralized.
CTC INTERNET, INC.
On April 2, 1998, the Company organized CTC Internet as a wholly
owned subsidiary to provide internet access and related services to residential
and business subscribers. CTC Internet's operations initially were limited to
the CTC Service Area. However, on May 8, 1998, CTC Internet acquired G.A.
Technologies, Inc., an internet provider based in Charlotte, North Carolina and
doing business as Vnet. As a result, CTC Internet now does business in the CTC
Service Area and in Charlotte, North Carolina, and intends to expand into
Greensboro and Raleigh, North Carolina in 1999.
CTC Internet's primary focus is to provide Internet services to
business customers, including high speed Internet services, Web site
development, Web site hosting and other value added services. In addition, CTC
Internet provides dial up Internet service to approximately 12,500 residential
customers in its market area.
INVESTMENTS
CT Cellular, Inc. Effective January 1, 1998, CT Cellular exchanged
its general partnership interests in RSA 4/5 and RSA 15 with Palmetto MobileNet,
L.P., a South Carolina limited partnership ("Palmetto"), in a tax free
transaction. RSA 4/5 and RSA 15 each provided cellular mobile telephone services
in an aggregate of eight counties in North Carolina. In exchange for its general
partnership interests, CT Cellular received a 19% limited partnership interest
in Palmetto and a 19.5% interest in the Common Stock of Palmetto's general
partner. Palmetto's other limited partners consist of 19 South Carolina
independent telephone companies. Palmetto owns a 50% general partnership
interest in ten North Carolina and South Carolina RSAs, with Alltel Mobile
(which acquired 360 communications in 1998) owning the other 50%.
Palmetto had earnings in 1998 of approximately $25.8 million.
CT Communications Northeast Trust. In December 1998, the Company
transferred substantially all of its portfolio of investment securities (the
"Investment Securities") to CT Trust, a Massachusetts business trust located in
Bedford, Massachusetts. The trustees of CTC Trust are Michael R. Coltrane and
the Company. Ownership of CTC Trust is represented by transferable shares of
beneficial interest, all of which are currently held by the Company. CTC Trust
subsequently transferred a substantial majority of the Investment Securities to
CT Communications Northeast, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation located in
Bedford, Massachusetts ("CTC Northeast"), which is wholly owned by CTC Trust.
The Investment Securities consist of a variety of public and private
equity securities. Approximately 95% of the Investment Securities consist of
common stock of ITC Holding Company, Inc. ("ITC Holding") and ITC DeltaCom, Inc.
("ITC DeltaCom"). In October 1997,
14
ITC Holding completed a corporate reorganization in which it transferred all of
its assets and liabilities other than the stock of its then wholly owned
subsidiary, ITC DeltaCom to another subsidiary. The former ITC Holding then
merged with and into ITC DeltaCom, and the other subsidiary was renamed ITC
Holding Company, Inc., which is the parent of a group of companies involved in a
wide range of telecommunications activities. ITC DeltaCom is a provider of
local, long distance and other telecommunications services to mid-sized and
major regional businesses in the southern United States, and also provides
wholesale long-haul services to other telecommunications companies using its
owned, operated and managed fiber optic network. As part of ITC Holding's
reorganization, stockholders of the former ITC Holding received, in exchange for
their shares of ITC Holding stock, shares of stock of the new ITC Holding and of
ITC DeltaCom. Immediately after the reorganization was consummated, ITC DeltaCom
completed its initial public offering of common stock. The Company owns
approximately 3.8% and 3.1% of the outstanding equity securities of ITC Holding
and ITC DeltaCom, respectively. At December 31, 1998, the Company's ownership
interest in ITC DeltaCom was recorded on the Company's financial statements at a
market value of $24.4 million, with a tax basis of $3.2 million. The Company has
recorded its equity interest in ITC Holding as of the same date at a cost basis
of $2.7 million.
Item 2. Properties
The properties of the Company consist of land, buildings, central
office equipment, exchange and toll switches, data transmission equipment,
underground conduits and cable, aerial cable, poles, wires, telephone
instruments, and other equipment. The Company's principal operations are
conducted in a building owned by the Company at 68 Cabarrus Avenue East,
Concord, North Carolina 28025. This headquarters facility was built in 1956 and
expanded in 1967. More recently, in 1991 the Company made substantial interior
renovations to the Cabarrus Avenue facility. This headquarters building has
approximately 53,000 square feet of floor space.
The Company's general warehouse is also owned by the Company and is
located in Concord. This facility was completely renovated in 1991 and has
approximately 12,300 square feet of floor space. The Company has enlarged its
warehouse storage facilities by the addition of approximately 9,760 square feet
of warehouse space in 1995. Approximately 3,800 square feet of warehouse space
that was renovated in 1995 is currently occupied by the Company's outside plant
engineering group.
During 1994, the Company acquired 14.7 acres of property north of
Concord adjoining Interstate 85 for use as a future campus-style business office
center. The Company purchased an additional acre of property at this site during
1996. The first of several buildings to be constructed at this site was
completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1996. This building is currently
occupied by the Company's customer service personnel and has approximately
12,000 square feet of floor space (the "Customer Care Center"). In the second
quarter of 1998, the Company completed construction of the second building on
this tract of property. It is identical to the building completed there during
1996. It was occupied primarily by the Company's sales and marketing group,
which freed office space at the Cabarrus Avenue headquarters facility.
15
There is significant room on this property for construction of additional
facilities as needed in the future.
In November 1997, the Company purchased a one-third interest in
22.424 acres of undeveloped property located on Weddington Road Extension and
Speedway Boulevard in the King's Grant Development. This property may be used
for future development if needed. The cost of this acquisition was $597,096.
In the three years ended December 31, 1998, the Company has acquired
property and built remote switching units in its exchange areas. During 1996,
the Company installed a new Nortel DMS 500 digital switch in downtown Charlotte,
North Carolina at a cost of $2.2 million. The new switch was placed in service
in October 1996, and has expanded the array of service offerings available from
CTC LDS and reduce CTC LDS's monthly operating expenses. All of the Company's
central office switching equipment is digital. In mid-1997, the Company began
replacing CTC's digital switching platform by changing from AG switches to
state-of-the-art Nortel DMS switches. This replacement process is expected to
last approximately five years. In 1997, the Company also replaced the DOTS
operator workstations used by CTC with TOPS workstations from Nortel. In 1998,
CTC Exchange Services installed and co-located a Reltec digital loop carrier at
the BellSouth central office in Salisbury, North Carolina.
In connection with CPC's PCS operations, the Company has entered
into three real property leases to house CPC's retail outlets in Concord,
Statesville and Salisbury, North Carolina. The Company expects to enter into a
fourth lease in the fourth quarter of 1999. The Company also leases office space
on West Cabarrus Avenue in Concord, North Carolina. None of these leases are
material to the Company, its operations or financial condition.
As of December 31, 1998, 18% of the Company's telephone plant in
service was represented by land, buildings and general equipment; 35% by central
office equipment; and 47% by wires, cables, conduits, poles and related
equipment. The connecting lines, poles, wires, cables and conduits and related
equipment referred to above are located on streets and public highways owned by
persons other than the Company, pursuant to consents of various governmental
bodies or to leases, permits, easements, agreements, or licenses, express or
implied through use without objection by the owners.
In addition to the foregoing, the Company uses approximately 110
motor vehicles in its operations.
During 1997, a portion of the Company's physical property was
subject to a certain Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated August 1,
1958, as supplemented and amended, securing the Company's First Mortgage Bonds.
This debt was retired on March 1, 1997, and the related liens were released.
16
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
(a) In December 1992, the Company was notified that it was a
potentially responsible party ("PRP") by the Environmental Protection Agency
("EPA") under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act ("CERCLA") at the Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination Superfund
Site (the "Site") in Concord, North Carolina. The Company, along with
approximately 70 other companies (the "PRP Group"), has entered into a Consent
Decree with the United States. Pursuant to the Consent Decree, the PRP Group is
conducting a cleanup of the Site. The companies also have reimbursed the EPA for
approximately $4.3 million in costs that the agency has incurred at the Site.
Under the allocation system adopted by the PRP Group, the Company has paid a
total of $53,128. Based on the progress of the cleanup thus far and the funds
available from other sources to pay for the cleanup, the PRP Group does not
expect that its members will be required to pay any additional amounts.
(b) The Company, CTC and Michael R. Coltrane have been named as
defendants, in addition to numerous other named defendants, in a lawsuit filed
by six former employees of US Telecom and US Telecom East, Inc. The Company,
through its subsidiaries, previously participated in a joint venture with US
Telecom Holdings, Inc., and Mr. Coltrane served as a member of its board of
directors. See "Item 1: Business; CT Global Telecommunications, Inc." The
Company believes that the claims are without merit and is vigorously defending
the suit. The Company further believes that the outcome of this litigation will
not be material to the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the
fourth quarter of 1998.
Item 4A. Executive Officers of the Company
The following list sets forth with respect to each of the current
executive officers of the Company, his or her name, age, positions and offices
held with the Company, the period served in such positions or offices and, if
such person served in such position or office for less than five year, the prior
employment of such person.
L.D. Coltrane, III, age 80, has served as Chairman of the Board
since 1986, when he was also named President of the Company to succeed his
father, L.D. Coltrane, Jr.
Michael R. Coltrane, age 52, has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company since 1988.
Thomas A. Norman, age 58, has served as Senior Vice President and
Assistant Secretary of the Company since 1995. He was the Vice President of
Sprint/Centel of Illinois from 1994 to 1995.
17
Barry R. Rubens, age 39, has served as Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company since 1995. He was
Vice President-External Affairs of the Company from 1992 to 1995.
Kenneth R. Argo, age 64, has served as the Vice President-Chief
Information Officer of the Company since 1995. From 1983 to 1995, he was the
Vice President-Controller of the Company.
Catherine A. Duda, age 46, has served as the Senior Vice President
and Assistant Secretary of the Company since 1996. From 1995 to 1996, she was
the Vice President- Marketing of the Company. Prior to 1995, she was the Vice
President of Frontier Communications of New York, Inc.
Richard L. Garner, Jr., age 52, has served as the Vice
President-Human Resources of the Company since June 1998. From 1979 to January
1998, he was the Senior Vice President of Personnel and Real Estate at Pic N'
Pay Stores (a retail specialty company).
Michael R. Nash, age 46, has served as a Senior Vice President of
the Company since January 1999. From 1995 to January 1999, he was a Vice
President of Standard Telephone Company. From 1974 to 1995, he was the
Operations Director of BellSouth Telecommunications.
Charlotte S. Walsh, age 52, has served as a Vice President of the
Company since January 1999. From August 1996 to August 1998, she was the Vice
President-Chief Information Officer of Thorn America (retail furniture company).
From 1992 to April 1996, she was the Division Vice President-Information
Services of Heleberg Diamonds (retail jewelry company).
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Company's Common Equity and Related Shareholder
Matters
Prior to January 29, 1999, both the Voting Common Stock and the
Class B Nonvoting Common Stock of the Company traded principally in local
transactions without the benefit of an established public trading market,
although a Charlotte-based brokerage firm made a market as shares of the Class B
Nonvoting Common Stock were offered for sale.
On July 24, 1997, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a
stock split in the form of a one-for-two stock dividend payable August 29, 1997
to holders of record on August 1, 1997.
Effective January 28, 1999, the issued and outstanding shares of
Voting Common Stock and Class B Nonvoting Common Stock were converted into a
single class of Common Stock. Pursuant to the Recapitalization, each issued and
outstanding share of Voting Common Stock was converted into 4.4 shares of Common
Stock and each issued and outstanding share of Class B Nonvoting Common Stock
was converted into 4.0 shares of Common Stock. Cash was paid in
18
lieu of issuing any fractional shares. Effective January 29, 1999, the Common
Stock began trading on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "CTCI."
During 1998, a known range of selling prices for the Class B
Nonvoting Common Stock was $32.75 to $37 per share, as adjusted to reflect the
Recapitalization. The closing price of the Common Stock on the Nasdaq National
Market on March 12, 1999 was $40.00.
Dividends per share were declared quarterly and paid on both Voting
Common Stock and Class B Nonvoting Common Stock for the two previous years. The
dividends per share set forth below have been adjusted to reflect the
one-for-two stock dividend in July 1997 and the Recapitalization in January
1999.
1998 1997
Quarter Dividend Dividend
- ------- -------- --------
First $ .12 $ .11
Second .12 .12
Third .12 .12
Fourth .12 .12
$ .48 $ .47
The number of holders of record of the Common Stock as of March 12,
1999, was 1,691.
19
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Years Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
---------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- -----------
Condensed Statements of Income(1):
Operating revenues $ 91,725,394 $ 78,483,514 $ 67,054,006 $ 60,417,351 $ 55,129,895
Operating expenses 70,272,414 58,390,372 51,349,967 43,201,065 43,760,298
---------------- --------------- --------------- -------------- --------------
Net Operating Revenues 21,452,980 20,093,142 15,704,039 17,216,286 11,369,597
Other income (expense)(2) 855,899 1,645,866 1,341,053 2,561,081 1,663,687
Income taxes (8,926,469) (7,898,159) (6,583,671) (6,760,624) (4,688,936)
---------------- --------------- --------------- -------------- --------------
Net income 13,382,410 13,840,849 10,461,421 13,016,743 8,344,348
Dividends on preferred stock 28,457 73,073 92,535 93,135 93,948
---------------- --------------- --------------- -------------- --------------
Earnings for common stock $ 13,353,953 $ 13,767,776 $ 10,368,886 $ 12,923,608 $ 8,250,400
================ =============== =============== ============== ==============
Common Stock Data: (3)
Shares of common stock
Basic weighted average 9,227,016 9,076,211 9,051,731 8,974,728 8,967,826
Diluted weighted average 9,276,504 9,111,439 9,078,385 8,990,336 8,983,422
Per share of common stock
Basic earnings $ 1.45 $ 1.52(2) $ 1.15 $ 1.44 $ .92
Diluted earnings $ 1.44 $ 1.51(2) $ 1.14 $ 1.44 $ .92
Dividends $ .48 $ .47 $ .46 $ .45 $ .44
Book value - year end $ 12.86 $ 10.82 $ 9.02 $ 9.04 $ 7.36
Total Assets $ 183,634,358 $ 147,339,429 $ 115,063,963 $ 107,765,477 $ 99,886,639
Long-Term Debt (excluding
current maturities) $ 20,000,000 $ 11,239,000 $ 2,014,000 $ 4,074,000 $ 4,714,000
Redeemable Preferred Stock with
Sinking Fund Requirements $ 125,000 $ 137,500 $ 150,000 $ 162,500 $ 175,000
(1) During 1996, the Company reclassified access and settlement charges
from an offsetting revenue account to an expense category on its 1996
consolidated statement of income. Amounts previously reported in the
1995 and 1994 consolidated statements of income have been reclassified
to conform with the 1996 consolidated statement of income in this
regard. Such reclassification has no effect on net income as
previously reported.
(2) Other income in 1997 includes an extraordinary item of $2,239,045, net
of income taxes of $1,493,312 (or $.25 per share), relating to the
discontinuance of SFAS No. 71.
(3) Per share data is based on the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the respective periods after giving retroactive
effect to the 25% stock distribution granted on September 1, 1994, the
2-for-1 split effective May 3, 1996, the 1-for-2 split effective
August 1, 1997, and the Recapitalization effective January 28, 1999.
Dividends declared per common share have been restated to give
retroactive effect to these events.
20
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the notes thereto
incorporated by reference in this Report.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company had net cash provided by its operating activities of $23.7
million, $21.2 million and $22.4 million in 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
In 1998, the Company used cash flows from operations and existing cash, cash
equivalents, short-term investments and borrowing on a line of credit to fund
(i) capital expenditures of $24.8 million pertaining to ongoing plant
construction projects, (ii) purchases of investments in affiliates of $4.4
million, (iii) purchases of investment securities of $100,919, (iv) dividends of
$4.4 million, (v) principal payments of $21.3 million to retire long-term debt,
and (vi) repurchases of Common Stock and Preferred Stock of $385,863.
Working capital as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 was $6.0 million and
$(1.6) million, respectively. The increase from 1997 to 1998 is due primarily to
a $3.4 million increase in accounts receivable and a $1.1 million increase in
other account receivable, which arose due primarily to a receivable from Maxcom
($700,000). In addition, cash and cash equivalents increased $2.8 million due
primarily to the sale of 100,000 shares of ITC Deltacom ($1.5 million). Also,
current portion of long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock fell by
$620,000, accounts payable fell by $1.1 million (due primarily to the 1997
overdraft of $200,000 reclassified to accounts payable) and income taxes payable
fell by $592,000. The increase in working capital was offset in part by an
increase of $1.3 million in accrued payroll, due to 24% increase in employees, a
3% average increase in salaries and wages and higher benefits and bonus
accruals.
The Company has significant cash requirements due to growth in its
service area and the need to modernize its existing plant and equipment. Capital
expenditures in 1998 included over $18 million in network enhancements,
including upgrades to the switching platform, and substantial investment in the
outside plant including poles, aerial cable and buried cable. The remaining $6.8
million of capital expenditures in 1998 included the completion of a new
operations building in Concord, North Carolina and information technology
upgrades. The Company's planned capital expenditures in 1999 are approximately
$24.5 million. Of this amount, $6 million is planned for primarily the
replacement of certain elements of the CTC switching platform with a new Nortel
DMS switch. This replacement process began in mid-1997 and will continue through
2002. Approximately $4.8 million of the total amount planned is for CTC Exchange
Services and CTC LDS switching and other network facilities. Another $5.9
million of the Company's capital expenditures is for outside plant and circuit
additions and improvements to include the placement of five Nortel remote
switching nodes, and another $10.3 million is for other switching assets and
network facilities. The remainder is made up of $900,000 for additional Internet
capacity and another $2.6 million for other telecommunications and other assets.
Actual capital expenditures were $24.8 million in 1998, $21.6 million in 1997
and $24.1 million in 1996.
21
Other anticipated uses of cash in 1999 include additional investments
in affiliates. The Company expects to spend approximately $1 million in 1999 for
wireless cable investments and plant and equipment associated with WONC related
to maintaining wireless cable television frequencies. See "Item 1. Business; CT
Wireless Cable, Inc."
If CTC elects during 1999 to exercise its right to partition out
certain territories for which the Company has invested in the BellSouth
Partnership, the resulting cost is expected to be between $15 million and $18
million. See "Item 1. Business; Carolina Personal Communications, Inc." The
Company expects to fund any such costs through additional borrowings under its
existing credit facility, as discussed below.
During 1998, the Company generated $23.7 million in cash from
operations and $3.6 million from financing activities. During the same period,
approximately $24.5 million was utilized for plant additions and other
investment activities, resulting in positive working capital of $2.8 million at
year-end. As of December 31, 1998, the Company had short-term investments of
$116,681, and one unsecured available line of credit for $60 million with First
Union National Bank, as Administrative Agent (the "FUNB Credit Facility"). At
December 31, 1998, the Company had used $20 million of the line of credit with
First Union National Bank to pay down and close the lines of credit at Rural
Telephone Finance Corporation and First Charter National Bank, which was an
increase of $8,761,000 in long-term debt from December 31, 1997 to 1998. The
interest rate on the FUNB Credit Facility is variable based on three-month
LIBOR, and the credit spread added to LIBOR is .50%. The interest rate at
December 31, 1998 was 5.57%. The FUNB Credit Facility provides for quarterly
payments of principal and interest until 2000 and is renewable for two separate
two-year extensions through December 31, 2004. Upon approval of the NCUC, the
terms of the FUNB Credit Facility will automatically convert to five years, due
December 31, 2003. The Company entered into an interest rate swap transaction
with First Union Capital Markets in March 1999 to fix $10 million of the
outstanding principal at a rate of 5.9% plus the credit spread described above.
Management intends to use the FUNB Credit Facility to fund certain activities in
1999, as described above.
As a limited partner of the BellSouth Partnership, the Company has
committed to make certain payments to the BellSouth Partnership for its pro rata
share of PCS license fee and network expenditures for the purpose of
constructing and operating PCS Services. The Company's obligations in this
regard were approximately $8.8 million over the four-year period ended on
December 31, 1998. During 1998, the Company expended approximately $1.0 million
in connection with its limited partner status in the BellSouth Partnership. The
Company's 1999 commitments are approximately $565,500. See "Item 1. Business;
Carolina Personal Communications, Inc."
The Company anticipates that all of the capital requirements in 1999
associated with its construction program, payments associated with long-term
debt and investments as summarized above will be provided by cash flows from
operations, existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and the
FUNB Credit Facility.
22
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
1998 Compared to 1997
Operating revenues increased $13,241,880 or 16.9% for the year ended
December 31, 1998 compared to 1997. This increase was primarily attributable to
revenues from local service, Internet services and PCS services. However, all
categories showed increases.
Local service revenues, from the provision of telephone exchange
services, increased $6,463,997 or 22.1% during 1998 compared to 1997. This
growth arose primarily from increased demand for local service due to growth in
the CTC Service Area, coupled with the implementation of the price regulation
plan as adopted by the Company in September 1997. Over 6,500 new access lines
were connected to the network in 1998, bringing the total number of local access
lines in CTC's three-county area service area to 109,147. Due to access line
growth and increased customer demand, this area of operations is expected to
continue to grow.
Access and toll revenues increased $1,756,245 or 5.0% during 1998
compared to 1997. Long distance service revenues are derived principally from
providing long distance communication between designated areas. Network access
service revenues are derived from other carriers for their use of the Company's
local network to complete long distance calls. This increase is the result of
increased sales and marketing efforts by CTC LDS and increased calling volume by
the interexchange carriers. Toll revenues in the intralata markets were flat
compared with 1997, primarily due to the full year impact of the new Rate Plan
implemented in September 1997. This was expected due to the rate structure,
which moved many toll revenues to the local revenue area. Compared to total
revenues, this category has a relatively small impact.
Other and unregulated revenues increased $5,073,628 or 34.3% during
1998 compared to 1997. This increase is made up of primarily increased Internet
service revenues of approximately $2,789,088 due to the May 1998 acquisition of
Vnet, increased PCS service revenues of $1,673,704, and increased directory
advertising of approximately $383,299.
Operating expenses, exclusive of depreciation, increased $8,653,566 or
17.7% during 1998 compared to 1997.
Plant specific expenditures increased $3,436,533 or 13.7%. This
increase results from an increase of $914,342 in interlata access expense due to
additional sales of toll services, an increase of $691,453 in contracted
services due to telephone plant growth, an increase of $679,385 in internet
network expense due to growth in internet sales and the acquisition of Vnet, and
$669,931 in CLEC service resell and access expense relating to the start up of
CTC Exchange Services. The remaining increase primarily relates to DCS resell
expense attributable to growth in CT Wireless Cable.
Customer operations expense increased $2,932,239 or 29.2% during 1998
compared to 1997. Approximately $981,162 of the increase consists of marketing
and advertising expense associated with additional sales efforts in long
distance services, CLEC services, and PCS services. Salaries and wages of sales
and marketing personnel also contribute to the increase.
23
Corporate operations expense increased $3,304,794 or 26.2% during 1998
compared to 1997. A majority of the increase is related to salaries and wages
and the expenses associated with the growth in operations.
Additionally, in January 1997, the Company offered an early retirement
program to 29 CTC employees. Twenty-eight of those eligible accepted the early
retirement package and the Company recorded an additional expense of $1,020,000
in connection with its obligations under this program.
Depreciation expense increased $3,228,476 or 33.6% during 1998
compared to 1997. This arose from a 1997 reduction in depreciation expense of
$736,971 due to a reclassification of circuit equipment to central office
switching equipment and the goodwill amortization expense of approximately
$400,000 related to the Vnet acquisition. Without this prior year
reclassification, depreciation expenses would have increased $2,491,505 due to
increased depreciable assets.
Other income increased $1,955,438 in 1998, compared to 1997. This
increase was attributable primarily to a $1,654,987 increase in dividend income,
interest income and gain on sale of investment contributed to the total
increase. The increase was also attributable to a $300,451 increase in equity in
income of affiliates driven by the earnings of the Company's investment in the
Palmetto MobileNet partnership providing cellular communications services in
North Carolina and South Carolina, partially offset by the Company's pro rata
share of losses related to the BellSouth Partnership. Losses associated with
start-up costs in connection with the BellSouth Partnership PCS network are
currently projected to continue through 2000. Management expects losses
associated with the BellSouth Partnership to begin to decline in 1999.
Other expense, principally interest, increased $506,360 in 1998
compared to 1997, due primarily to additional interest paid on loans
outstanding.
For the reasons set forth above, the Company's net income before
extraordinary items in 1998 increased $1,780,606 or 15.3% compared to 1997.
Considering the 1997 extraordinary item arising from the discontinuance of SFAS
71, 1998 net income decreased $458,439 or 3.3%. With the rapid pace of change in
the telecommunications industry caused by deregulation and advancing technology,
management expects operating expenses to increase. It also expects operating
losses in newly established business ventures to continue, but at a reduced
rate. Management believes that expenditures in telephone plant construction,
switching, marketing and advertising will continue to cause increases in
operating costs, but it believes these expenditures are necessary to its
long-term profitability and growth.
1997 Compared to 1996
Operating revenues increased $11,429,508 or 17.05% for the year ending
December 31, 1997 compared to 1996. This increase was primarily attributable to
local service, long distance service, PCS service and business system sales.
However, all categories showed increases.
Local service revenues, from the provision of telephone exchange
services, increased $4,482,363 or 18.1% during 1997 compared to 1996. This
growth arose primarily from
24
increased demand for local services due to growth in the CTC Service Area.
Nearly 5,700 new access lines were connected to the network in 1997, bringing
the total number of local access lines in CTC's three-county service area to
102,221. Due to access line growth and increased customer demand, this area of
operations is expected to continue to grow.
Access and toll revenues increased $3,224,489 or 10.2% during 1997
compared to 1996. This increase is the result of increased sales and marketing
efforts by CTC LDS and increased calling volume by the interexchange carriers.
Toll revenues in the intralata markets decreased due to the new Rate Plan
implemented in September. This was expected due to the rate structure which
moved toll revenues to the local revenues area. This reduction, however, is
unquantifiable and is relatively small when compared to total revenues.
Other and unregulated revenues increased $3,781,338 or 34.4% during
1997 compared to 1996. This increase is made up of increased directory
advertising of approximately $603,545, increased Internet revenues of
approximately $411,437, a $1,424,580 increase in business system sales, a
$282,808 increase in PCS telephone system sales and a $473,518 increase in
inside wire maintenance revenue.
Operating expenses, exclusive of depreciation, increased $7,533,122 or
18.3% during 1997 compared to 1996. Plant specific expenditures increased
$5,061,789 or 25.3%. This increase results from an increase of $1,478,813 in DCS
service expense and cost of goods sold associated with the CT Wireless Cable,
Inc. subsidiary; an increase in access expense of $1,648,041 due to additional
sales of toll services; and an increase of $697,164 relating to business systems
cost of goods sold. The remaining increase is primarily expenses associated with
an increase in outside contractor cost relating to the replacement of SPN poles
and increased expenditures in telephone plant due to growth.
Corporate and customer operations expense increased $1,451,333 or 6.8%
during 1997 compared to 1996. Approximately $793,824 or 54.7% relates to costs
associated with additional sales and marketing efforts in long distance services
and $587,313 or 40.5% related to PCS sales and marketing efforts. Another
$201,626 of this amount related to additional expenditures in customer service
operations.
Other income decreased $1,654,069 or 81% in 1997, compared to 1996.
This decrease was primarily attributable to the Company's pro rata share of the
BellSouth Partnership's losses experienced in connection with start-up costs
associated with the PCS network, which became operational during the third
quarter of 1996. These losses were partially offset by higher income in 1997
over 1996 as a result of the equity in earnings of the Company's investment in
the Alltel Mobile Partnership providing cellular communications services in
North Carolina RSAs 4/5 and 15.
Other expenses, principally interest, increased $280,163 in 1997
compared to 1996. This increase was primarily from additional interest paid on
loans outstanding.
As discussed above, in January 1997, the Company offered an early
retirement program to 29 CTC employees. Twenty-eight of those eligible accepted
the early retirement package and the Company recorded an additional expense of
$1,020,000 in connection with its obligations under this program.
25
Depreciation expense decreased $492,717 during 1997 compared to 1996.
This decrease resulted from a reclassification of circuit equipment amounts into
the Central Office switching category and recalculating previously recorded
depreciation expense at the lower rates used for switching equipment. The
reduction of depreciation expense due to reclassification is $736,971. The
Company also recorded additional depreciation of $600,000 during the same period
of the prior year, as authorized by the NCUC. Without these factors, this
expense would have increased by $844,254, which would be expected due to the
increased depreciable plant balances.
For the reasons set forth above, the Company's net income before
extraordinary item in 1997 increased $1,140,383 or 10.9% compared to 1996.
Considering the extraordinary item arising from the discontinuance of SFAS 71,
1997 net income increased $3,379,428 compared to 1996.
OTHER EVENTS
Vnet Acquisition
Effective May 8, 1998, the Company acquired G-A Technologies, Inc.,
doing business as Vnet Access ("Vnet"). Vnet is a regional provider of Internet
services headquarters in Charlotte, North Carolina. The acquisition was effected
through the tax-free merger of Vnet into a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Company and was accounted for as a purchase. The resulting subsidiary of the
Company continues to offer services under the Vnet brand name. All consideration
was paid to the Vnet shareholders in the form of Common Stock. The acquisition
was not material to the Company's operations or financial condition.
New Rate Plan
Effective September 1, 1997, CTC began operation under the new Rate
Plan. Although the Company's new rate structure under the Rate Plan reflects an
increase for the cost of basic service, other changes in the Rate Plan offset
these increases for many customers. Overall, the new rate structure did not
materially impact the Company's revenues in 1997 or 1998 and is not expected to
materially impact revenues in 1999 or future years. By submitting its price
regulation filing, the Company has agreed to open its markets to competition for
local dial tone service, on the condition that the Company is allowed to
"rebalance" or adjust its rates at the same time. Although the competitive
pressures of opening its markets to competition from other local telephone
service providers may lead to reductions in the Company's future local service
revenues, management believes that by rebalancing its local service rates, it
can compete in emerging markets and continue to sustain local rates at levels
that are affordable for customers. See "Item 1. Business" for additional
information regarding the Rate Plan.
1996 Telecommunications Act
On February 8, 1996, the Telecom Act was enacted into law. Among its
numerous other effects, the Telecom Act opens local telephone markets to
competition. Although the precise impact of the Telecom Act will not be known
until additional progress is made by the FCC in its ongoing rule making efforts,
it is clear that the Company will encounter increasing competition in virtually
all of its markets, including local dial tone and long distance service through
the
26
remainder of the 1990s. By implementing the new Rate Plan, the Company has
taken a proactive step towards opening its markets to competition for local dial
tone service. While there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to
maintain its present levels of profitability in this emerging competitive
environment, management believes that its ongoing investments in its network,
including the installation of digital switches and other equipment, combined
with greater flexibility in setting prices, will enable the Company to compete
more effectively by providing enhanced services at affordable rates. See "Item
1. Business" for additional information regarding the Telecom Act.
ACCOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS
As described in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of
the Company, the Company discontinued applying Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 71 (FAS 71), "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of
Regulation," as of April 1, 1997. The Company determined that it no longer met
the criteria for following FAS 71 due to changes in the manner in which the
Company is regulated and the heightened competitive environment. The accounting
impact was an extraordinary non-cash gain of $2,239,045, net of applicable
income taxes of $1,493,212. The effect on future charges for depreciation is not
expected to differ materially from what would have been recorded under FAS 71.
Effective December 31, 1998, the Company adopted FAS 131, "Disclosures
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related information." CTC is the Company's
only reportable segment. CTC evaluates performance based on operating profit
before other income (expenses) and income taxes. Intersegment sales are
accounted for as if the transactions were to third parties. See Note 15 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for additional information.
YEAR 2000 CONSIDERATIONS
The Company has developed and is implementing a company-wide project
that addresses the business issues associated with the Year 2000 problem. The
Company's Year 2000 project is a top corporate priority and has the full support
and commitment of its executive management team.
In January 1998, the Company identified a Year 2000 Project Team, with
members representing all significant areas of the Company's business operations.
An initial study of the Company's capabilities and needs was completed, and
awareness of Year 2000 issues was established across the Company's management
team. The Company retained DMR Consulting Group ("DMR") to help the Project Team
coordinate the initial phases of the Year 2000 project. DMR established a
project office at the Company's offices and met regularly with members of the
Project Team during the first three quarters of 1998 to coordinate overall
project needs. DMR completed substantially all of its services for the Company
during the fourth quarter of 1998 and no longer maintains an on-site project
office.
The Year 2000 Project Team continues to focus on addressing the impact
of the Year 2000 problem on the Company's telecommunications network, internal
information systems and business operations generally. Fourteen individual
business unit teams have been established, each having responsibility to address
Year 2000 issues within the business units, but with direct
27
reporting to and coordination with the Company's Year 2000 Project Team. The
Year 2000 Project Team is implementing an overall compliance process consisting
of four phases: (1) Inventory; (2) Assessment; (3) Remediation/Replacement; and
(4) Testing.
The Company has completed the inventory and assessment phases of the
Year 2000 project. The Company estimates that as of March 1, 1999, remediation
and replacement efforts company-wide were 90% complete. The testing phase is
also well underway. The Company expects testing to continue throughout 1999 as
the functionality and interoperability of systems and devices is checked and
rechecked.
The Year 2000 Project Team has created a test lab for validating
internal information systems, including all management information systems,
billing functions and financial systems. The Company supplements this test data
with Year 2000 compliance inquiries to application vendors. The Company writes
very little original software code, typically purchasing third-party software
for its major business applications. Routine upgrades of systems pursuant to
maintenance agreements have enhanced the progress of the Company's Year 2000
project effort.
A significant aspect of the Company's Year 2000 project focuses on
local and long-distance service delivery, network access and network
interoperability. The Company identified its critical system and network
component suppliers during the inventory and assessment process. The Company has
continuously communicated with these critical suppliers through correspondence,
and in many instances through direct contact, to obtain reliable information
regarding the Year 2000 readiness of key system hardware and software
components. This information is updated regularly so that the Project Team
remains aware of any status changes. In addition, the Company participates in
important telecommunications forums, such as the United States Telephone
Association and the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions ("ATIS"),
both of which are devoting significant attention to the Year 2000 problem in the
telecommunications industry. Interoperability testing information generated by
the ATIS' National Testing Committee, of which the Company is a member, is an
important aspect of the Company's effort to maintain the integrity of its
network, and its ability to interconnect with other systems. Although the
Company is not independently testing network system hardware and software
components for Year 2000 readiness, the Company believes that reliance on
testing information generated by vendors and the ATIS' National Testing
Committee is appropriate.
Another component of the Company's business is the sale of advanced
business systems, such as voice mail systems and PBX switches, as an authorized
distributor for several manufacturers. The Company has been proactive in
communicating with customers who have purchased advanced business systems from
the Company to distribute Year 2000 readiness information made available by the
manufacturers of those systems.
The Company believes that it is implementing a sound plan that
anticipates and resolves potential Year 2000 issues in a timely manner. The
Company estimates that its critical business applications, network systems and
components will be Year 2000 ready by June 1999, although the Company plans to
continue testing and coordination with other network and system operators
throughout the year.
The Company has existing standard contingency plans in place for
handling outages and other emergencies; however, the Company is in the process
of supplementing its existing
28
contingency plans and developing additional contingency plans to address the
potential impact of Year 2000 problems on its network and information systems.
The Company has targeted June 1999 for completion of additional contingency
plans.
In 1998, out-of-pocket expenses for the Year 2000 project were
approximately $500,000. The Company has budgeted an additional $500,000 for
completion of the Year 2000 project effort during 1999. The cost of the Year
2000 project has been favorably affected by the impact of routine yearly
maintenance agreements with application and component vendors.
Failure to accurately assess or remedy the Company's Year 2000 issues
prior to the end of 1999, including failure of third parties on whom the Company
depends, could significantly disrupt the Company's business and materially
adversely affect the Company's financial condition, liquidity and business
operations. A majority of the Company's services rely heavily on technology that
could cease to operate, or could operate much less efficiently, if affected by
the Year 2000 problem. In addition, Year 2000-related problems could lead to
potential third-party claims, the impact of which cannot be estimated reliably.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The foregoing discussion contains forward-looking statements about the
Company's financial condition and results of operations, which are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Words such as
"expects," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," variations of such words and
other similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which reflect management's judgment only as of the
date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these
forward-looking statements to reflect events and circumstances that arise after
the date hereof.
Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from these
forward-looking statements are (1) the Company's ability to respond effectively
to the sweeping changes in industry conditions created by the Telecom Act, and
related state and federal legislation and regulations, (2) the Company's ability
to successfully manage the Rate Plan, (3) the Company's ability to recover the
substantial costs to be incurred in connection with the implementation of its
PCS business, (4) the Company's ability to retain its existing customer base
against local and long distance service competition, and to market such services
to new customers, (5) the Company's ability to effectively manage rapid changes
in technology, (6) whether the Company can effectively respond to the actions of
its competitors and (7) whether the Company can successfully and timely
implement its Year 2000 plan.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company has outstanding an unsecured credit facility for $60
million with First Union National Bank, as Administrative Agent. There was $20
million outstanding under the FUNB Credit Facility as of December 31, 1998. See
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations; Liquidity and Capital Resources."
29
Pursuant to the terms of the FUNB Credit Facility, the interest rate
on borrowed funds is variable based on three-month LIBOR. Therefore, if interest
rates increase generally, the rate paid by the Company under the FUNB Credit
Facility will increase; likewise, if interest rates fall generally, the
Company's rate will fall. On March 5, 1999, the Company entered into an interest
rate swap transaction with First Union Capital Markets to establish a fixed rate
of interest on $10 million of the outstanding principal under the FUNB Credit
Facility at December 31, 1998. The interest rate swap will protect the Company,
to the extent of $10 million of outstanding principal amount, against an upward
movement in interest rates, but subjects the Company to higher interest costs if
interest rates decline. The Company believes that reasonably foreseeable
movements in interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition or operations of the Company.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, the financial
statement schedules required to be filed herewith and the Report of Independent
Public Accountants thereon are incorporated by reference to the Company's 1999
Annual Report.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Company
The information called by Item 10 with respect to directors and
Section 16 matters is set forth in the Company's Proxy Statement for its 1999
Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the captions "Election of Directors," and
"Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance," respectively, and is
hereby incorporated by reference. The information called for by Item 10 with
respect to executive officers is set forth in Part I, Item 4A hereof.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information called for by Item 11 is set forth in the Company's
Proxy Statement for its 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the captions
"Election of Directors - Compensation of Directors," "Executive Compensation"
and "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation
Decisions," respectively, and is hereby incorporated by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The information called for by Item 12 is set forth in the Company's
Proxy Statement for its 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the captions
"Principal Shareholders" and "Management Ownership of Common Stock,"
respectively, and is hereby incorporated by reference.
30
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information called for by Item 13 is set forth in the Company's
Proxy Statement for its 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the captions
"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" and is hereby incorporated by
reference.
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Documents filed as part of this report
(1) Financial Statements: The following financial statements,
together with the report thereon of independent auditors,
are incorporated herein by reference to the Company's 1999
Annual Report:
o Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 1998 and 1997
o Consolidated statements of income for the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996
o Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996
o Consolidated statements of stockholders' equity for the years
ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996
o Consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996
o Notes to consolidated financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996
o Report of Independent Public Accountants
(2) Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules: The following
financial statement schedule, together with the report
thereon of independent auditors, is incorporated herein by
reference to the Company's 1999 Annual Report:
o Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Other schedules are omitted because the required information
is included in the financial statements or is not
applicable.
(3) Financial Statements of Palmetto MobileNet, L.P. (To be
filed as an amendment to this Report on Form 10-K.)
32
(4) The exhibits filed as part of this Report and exhibits
incorporated herein by reference to other documents are
listed in the Index to Exhibits to this Report.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The Company did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the three
months ended December 31, 1998.
(c) Exhibits
See (a)(4), above.
(d) Financial statement schedules See (a)(2), above.
32
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
By: /s/ Michael R. Coltrane
Michael R. Coltrane
President and Chief
Executive Officer
Date: March 26, 1999
/s/ Barry R. Rubens
Barry R. Rubens
Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Principal
Accounting Officer)
Date: March 26, 1999
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Company in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date
/s/ L.D. Coltrane III Chairman of the Board March 26, 1999
L.D. Coltrane III and Director
/s/ Michael R. Coltrane President, Chief Executive March 26, 1999
Michael R. Coltrane Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ John R. Boger, Jr. Director March 26, 1999
John R. Boger, Jr.
33
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
/s/ O. Charlie Chewning Director March 26, 1999
O. Charlie Chewning
/s/ William A. Coley Director March 26, 1999
William A. Coley
/s/ Samuel E. Leftwich Director March 26, 1999
Samuel E. Leftwich
/s/ Jerry H. McClellan Director March 26, 1999
Jerry H. McClellan
/s/ Ben F. Mynatt Director March 26, 1999
Ben F. Mynatt
/s/ Phil W. Widenhouse Director March 26, 1999
Phil W. Widenhouse
34
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. Description
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on
January 28, 1999.)
3.2 Bylaws of the Company, as amended.
4.2 Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of January 28, 1999 and
effective as of August 27, 1998, between the Company and First Union National
Bank, including the Rights Certificate attached as an exhibit thereto. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A
filed on January 28, 1999).
4.3 Specimen of Common Stock Certificate. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form 8-A filed on January 28, 1999.)
4.4 Credit Agreement, dated as of December 31, 1998, by and among the Company,
the Subsidiary Borrowers referred to therein, the Lenders referred to therein and
First Union National Bank, as administrative agent.
4.5 The Company has certain long-term debt, but has not filed the instruments
evidencing such debt as part of Exhibit 4 because such instruments do not
authorize the issuance of debt exceeding 10% of the total consolidated assets of the
Company. The Company agrees to furnish a copy of such instruments to the
Commission upon request.
10.1 BellSouth Carolinas PCS Limited Partnership Agreement dated December 8, 1994.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(h) to the Company's Amendment No. 1 to
Annual Report Form 10-K/A dated July 14, 1995.)
10.2 Limited Liability Company Agreement of Wireless One of North Carolina, L.L.C.
dated October 10, 1995 by and among CT Wireless Cable, Inc., Wireless One, Inc.
and O. Gene Gabbard. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 31, 1997.)
10.3 1989 Executive Stock Option Plan dated April 26, 1989. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Company's Annual Report Form 10-K dated
March 29, 1994.)*
10.4 Comprehensive Stock Option Plan dated April 27, 1995. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 33-59645) dated May 26, 1995.)*
10.5 Employee Stock Purchase Plan dated April 27, 1995. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-
59643) dated May 26, 1995.)*
Exhibit No. Description
10.6 Restricted Stock Award Program dated April 27, 1995. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-
59641) dated May 26, 1995.)*
10.7 Omnibus Stock Compensation Plan dated April 24, 1997. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K dated
April 9, 1998).*
10.8 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan dated April 24, 1997. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K dated
April 9, 1998).*
10.9 Change in Control Agreement, dated October 1, 1997, between the Company and
Michael R. Coltrane. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K dated April 9, 1998).*
10.10 Change in Control Agreement, dated October 1, 1997, between the Company and
Barry R. Rubens. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K dated April 9, 1998).*
10.11 Change in Control Agreement, dated October 1, 1997, between the Company and
Nicholas L. Kottyan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K dated April 9, 1998).*
10.12 Change in Control Agreement, dated October 1, 1997, between the Company and
Thomas A. Norman. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K dated April 9, 1998).*
10.13 Change in Control Agreement, dated October 1, 1997, between the Company and
Catherine A. Duda. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K dated April 9, 1998).*
10.14 Change in Control Agreement, dated as of June 22, 1998, between the Company
and Richard L. Garner, Jr.*
10.15 Change in Control Agreement, dated as of December 12, 1998, between the
Company and Michael R. Nash.*
10.16 Change in Control Agreement, dated as of December 30, 1998, between the
Company and Charlotte S. Walsh.*
10.17 Form of Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated June 27, 1997.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K dated April 9, 1998).*
10.18 Contribution Agreement by and among Palmetto MobileNet, L.P., PMN, Inc., the
Company and Ellerbe Telephone Co., dated as of January 1, 1998. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
dated April 9, 1998).
Exhibit No. Description
10.19 Separation Agreement and Release, dated as of January 18, 1999, between the
Company and Nicholas L. Kottyan.
10.20 Employment Agreement, dated September 10, 1998, among the Company, CT
Global Telecommunications, Inc. and Thomas A. Norman.
21 Subsidiaries of the Company.
23 Consent of KPMG LLP.
27 Financial Data Schedule.
- ----------
* Indicates management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an Exhibit.