FORM 10-QSB SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ____________ to _________________ Commission File Number 000-30563 DELTA MUTUAL, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE 14-1818394 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 6723 WHITTIER AVENUE, SUITE 203, MCLEAN, VA 22101 (703) 918-0350 (Address and telephone number, including area code, of registrant's principal executive office) (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES X NO --- --- Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. At November 1, 2002, there were 55,700 shares of Common Stock, $.0001 par value, outstanding. DELTA MUTUAL, INC. INDEX ----- Page ---- Part I. Financial Information 1 Item 1 Financial Statements Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2002 (unaudited) and December 31, 2001 2 Statements of Operations for the Nine Months and Three Months Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 (unaudited) and the Period November 17, 1999 (Date of Formation) through September 30, 2002 3 Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 (unaudited) and the Period November 17, 1999 (Date of Formation) through September 30, 2002 4 - 5 Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) 6 - 12 Item 2 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 13- 19 Item 14 Controls and Procedures 19 Part II. Other Information Item 1 Legal Proceedings 20 Item 2 Changes in Securities 20 Item 3 Defaults upon Senior Securities 20 Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 20 Item 5 Other Information 20 Item 6 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 20 Signatures 21 PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements Certain information and footnote disclosures required under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted from the following financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. It is suggested that the following financial statements be read in conjunction with the year-end financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2001. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year or for any other period. 1 DELTA MUTUAL INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) BALANCE SHEET ASSETS ------ September 30, December 31, 2002 2001 ------------- ------------- (Unaudited) Current Assets: Cash $ 31 $ 36,641 Note receivable (less allowance of $96,625 at September 30, 2002) -- 60,000 Prepaid expenses -- 23,000 --------- --------- Total Current Assets 31 119,641 Other assets -- 30,000 --------- --------- TOTAL ASSETS $ 31 $ 149,641 ========= ========= LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY ---------------------------------------- Current Liabilities: Convertible debt $ -- $ 250,000 Loan from stockholders 24,348 -- Accounts payable and accrued expenses 84,417 65,870 --------- --------- Total Current Liabilities 108,765 315,870 --------- --------- Commitments and Contingencies Stockholders' Deficiency: Common stock $0.0001 par value - authorized 20,000,000 shares; 55,700 shares issued and outstanding 6 6 Additional paid-in-capital 256,902 48,272 Deficit accumulated during the development stage (365,642) (214,507) --------- --------- Total Stockholders' Deficiency (108,734) (166,229) --------- --------- TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY $ 31 $ 149,641 ========= ========= See notes to financial statements. 2 DELTA MUTUAL INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) Period from November 17, 1999 Nine Months Ended September 30, Three Months Ended September 30, (Date of Formation) ------------------------------- -------------------------------- through 2002 2001 2002 2001 September 30, 2002 ---------- ---------- ---------- -------- ------------------ Costs and Expenses General and administrative expenses $ 151,135 $ 54,513 $ 2,134 $ 28,721 $ 365,642 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Net loss $(151,135) $ (54,513) $ (2,134) $ (28,721) $(365,642) --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Loss per common share - basic and diluted $ (2.71) $ (0.98) $ (0.04) $ (0.52) ========= ========= ========= ========= Weighted average number of common shares outstanding- basic and diluted 55,700 55,700 55,700 55,700 ========= ========= ========= ========= See notes to financial statements. 3 DELTA MUTUAL INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) Period November 17, 1999 Nine Months Ended September 30, (Date of Formation) ------------------------------- through 2002 2001 September 30, 2002 ----------- ------------ ------------------ Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss $(151,135) $ (54,513) $(365,642) Reserve for bad debt on note receivable 96,625 -- 96,625 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: 23,552 (21,229) 36,422 --------- --------- --------- Net cash used in operating activities: (30,958) (75,742) (232,595) --------- --------- --------- Cash flows from investing activities: Advances (30,000) -- (90,000) --------- --------- --------- Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from sale of common stock -- -- 10,750 Proceeds from loan -- 494,414 540,744 Repayment of loan -- (440,000) (540,744) Proceeds from convertible debt -- -- 250,000 Proceeds from stockholder 24,348 32,578 61,876 --------- --------- --------- Net cash provided by financing activities 24,348 86,992 322,626 --------- --------- --------- Net increase (decrease) in cash (36,610) 11,250 31 Cash - Beginning of year 36,641 421 -- --------- --------- --------- Cash - Ending of year $ 31 $ 11,671 $ 31 ========= ========= ========= See notes to financial statements. 4 DELTA MUTUAL INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) Period November 17, 1999 Nine Months Ended September 30, (Date of Formation) -------------------------------- through 2002 2001 September 30, 2002 ---------- ----------- -------------------- Non-cash financing activities: Conversion of debt to paid-in-capital $ 958,630 $ -- $ 958,630 ========= ========== ========= Conversion of note receivable to paid-in-capital $(750,000) $ -- $(750,000) ========= ========== ========= Forgiveness of debt to former shareholder $ -- $ -- $ 37,528 ========= ========== ========= Supplementary information: Cash paid during year for: Interest $ -- $ -- ========= ========== ========= Income taxes $ -- $ -- ========= ========== ========= Changes in operating assets and liabilities consists of: Increase in interest receivable $ (6,625) $ -- $ (6,625) Decrease in prepaid expenses 8,000 -- (15,000) Decrease in other assets -- -- (30,000) Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses 22,177 (21,229) 88,047 --------- ---------- --------- $ 23,552 $ (21,229) $ 36,422 ========= ========== ========= See notes to financial statements. 5 DELTA MUTUAL INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES ORGANIZATION - ------------ The Company was incorporated under the name Delta Mutual, Inc. on November 17, 1999 in the State of Delaware. The Company has not commenced operations and no revenues have been derived since its formation. Accordingly, the Company is considered a development stage enterprise. The Company originally intended to provide mortgage services through the Internet to the "sub-prime" market, but no longer pursues that business plan. On May 11, 2001 the Company entered into an agreement of sale with Enterprise Solutions, Inc. ("ESI"). Pursuant to that agreement, the Company was to acquire substantially all of the assets of ESI in exchange for approximately 10,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock. ESI was organized to develop and sell high assurance security computer networks and related products and services to both government agencies and commercial enterprises. ESI was in the development stage and had no revenues of a continuing nature. Incident to such agreement, the Company was granted an exclusive world-wide license by ESI to make, use and sell their technology, hardware and software products. The merger agreement and the licensing agreement were both terminated on April 16, 2002. See Note 2 of Notes to Financial Statements. On July 9, 2002 the Company entered into a proposed merger agreement with Helvetia Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Helvetia"), a Delaware corporation. Helvetia is a pharmaceutical company that focuses on a variety of treatment-resistant centers, such as hormone-resistant prostate and pancreatic cancer, liver cancer and ovarian cancer, utilizing intracellular hypothermia therapy, a unique methodology coupled with proprietary agents. Helvetia operates facilities in the United States and Europe. The merger was terminated on November 6, 2002. 6 BASIS OF PRESENTATION - --------------------- The balance sheet as of September 30, 2002 and the statements of operations and cash flows for the periods presented herein have been prepared by the Company and are unaudited. In the opinion of management all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for all periods presented have been made. The information for the balance sheet as of December 31, 2001 was derived from audited financial statements. The Company's financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 have been prepared on a going concern basis which contemplates the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. Management recognizes that the Company's continued existence is dependent upon its ability to obtain needed working capital through additional equity and/or debt financing and the commencement of its planned principal operations. The Company's business is subject to most of the risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise. The likelihood of success of the Company must be considered in light of the expenses, difficulties, delays and unanticipated challenges encountered in connection with the formation of a new business, raising operating and development capital, and the marketing of a new product. The Company presently does not have sufficient liquid assets to finance its anticipated funding needs and obligations. The Company recently terminated its merger agreement and license agreement with ESI. The Company's continued existence is dependent upon its ability to obtain needed working capital through additional equity and/or debt financing. Management is actively seeking additional capital to ensure the continuation of its operations. However, there is no assurance that additional capital will be obtained. It remains the Company's intention to enter into a merger or acquire the assets of another business. On July 9, 2002 the Company entered into a proposed merger with Helvetia, a pharmaceutical company. The merger was subject to due diligence by both parties. As a result of information discovered during due diligence, the parties cancelled the proposed merger on November 6, 2002. These events and uncertainties raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a gong concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. 7 LOSS PER SHARE - -------------- Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share are computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common and potential common shares during the year. Potential common shares are excluded from the loss per share calculation, because the effect would be antidilutive. Potential common shares relate to the convertible debt. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS - -------------------------------- On June 29, 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Intangible Assets." The major provisions of SFAS No. 141 were as follows: all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 must use the purchase method of accounting; the pooling of interest method of accounting is prohibited. SFAS No. 142 eliminated the amortization of goodwill and other intangibles and requires an impairment test of their carrying value. An initial impairment test of goodwill and other intangibles must be completed in the year of adoption with at least an annual impairment test thereafter. On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142. The adoption of SFAS No. 142 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position. In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143 "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations". SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations and costs associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets. The Company is required to implement SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003. Management believes the effect of implementing this pronouncement will not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position. In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. Under SFAS No. 144 assets held for sale will be included in discontinued operations if the operations and cash flows will be or have been eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity and the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component. The Company adopted SFAS No. 144 on January 1, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position. 8 In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145 "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections". This statement eliminates the automatic classification of gain or loss on extinguishment of debt as an extraordinary item of income and requires that such gain or loss be evaluated for extraordinary classification under the criteria of Accounting Principles Board No. 30 "Reporting Results of Operations". This statement also requires sales-leaseback accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sales-leaseback transactions, and makes various other technical corrections to existing pronouncements. This statement will be effective for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2003. Management believes that adopting this statement will not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations or financial position. In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." This Statement requires recording costs associated with exit or disposal activities at their fair values when a liability has been incurred. Under previous guidance, certain exit costs were accrued upon management's commitment to an exit plan. Adoption of this Statement is required with the beginning of fiscal year 2003. The Company has not yet completed the evaluation of the impact of adopting this Statement. On October 1, 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 147, "Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions." SFAS No. 147 removes acquisitions of financial institutions from the scope of FASB Statement No. 72, "Accounting for Certain Acquisitions of Banking or Thrift Institutions", and FASB Interpretation No. 9, "Applying APB Opinion Nos. 16 and 17 When a Savings and Loan Association or a Similar Institution is Acquired in a Business Combination Accounted for by the Purchase Method," and requires that those transactions be accounted for in accordance with FASB Statements Nos. 141 and 142. Additionally, this Statement amends FASB Statement No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," to include in its scope long-term customer-relationship intangible assets of financial institutions such as depositor and borrower relationship intangible assets and credit cardholder intangible assets. Consequently, those intangible assets are subject to the same undiscounted cash flow recoverability test and impairment loss recognition and measurement provisions that Statement 144 requires for other long-lived assets that are held and used. This statement became effective on October 1, 2002 and did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position. 9 2. AGREEMENT OF SALE In May 2001, Delta and ESI entered into an agreement whereby ESI was to sell its assets to Delta for 1.2676 newly issued Delta common shares for each common share of ESI outstanding. In June 2001, the Company prepared and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement for the shares to be issued to ESI's stockholders, with a view to consummating the acquisition. In the fall of 2001, the Company loaned ESI substantial monies. See Note 4 of Notes to Financial Statements. On October 21, 2001, ESI's president died leaving ESI without a chief executive. ESI was without sufficient funds to pay the professional and accounting fees necessary for a closing, or to pay for marketing its products. The Company therefore determined not to expend additional funds on such acquisition and to look for an alternative business to acquire or with which to merge. In light of such changed circumstances, ESI's lack of funds with which to pay the costs necessary to close on the transaction, and the Securities and Exchange Commission's comments with respect to the party's registration statement, the Company views the Agreement of Sale as terminated and has suspended all activities to implement such acquisition. The Company has withdrawn its registration statement. On April 16, 2002, a termination of the merger agreement was signed because the registration statement required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the acquisition and approval by stockholders of ESI did not take place. As part of the termination agreement, the Company received a note by John Solomon in favor of ESI in the amount of $750,000. The Company transferred ownership to ESI approximately 35 TAD Devices and 1 NRE and cancelled its license agreement with ESI to make, use and sell any ESI technology and products and each company released the other from any and all liability related to and arising under the merger agreement. The Company transferred the $750,000 note it received from ESI to the holder of the Company's $250,000 convertible note in satisfaction of the convertible note. 3. NOTES RECEIVABLE The Company entered into an agreement with ESI whereby the Company would advance to ESI up to $100,000. ESI agreed to pay the entire amount advanced, including interest at a rate of 10% per annum, on or before June 30, 2002. At the Company's option, the Company may convert the unpaid principal balance of the note, together with accrued interest, into that number of shares of stock of ESI at the conversion price of $.20 per common share, or the existing market price, whichever is greater, anytime prior to maturity. As of September 30, 2002 the Company advanced ESI $90,000. Interest receivable at September 30, 2002 was $6,625 which was fully reserved against the debt. 10 The note receivable is secured by the assets of ESI. The assets of ESI include a judgement ESI obtained against Herbert Cannon in the amount of $2.2 million. Approximately $2.4 million belonging to Herbert Cannon is held by Court order and by the District Court for the Southern District of New York. ESI has filed a claim against those funds to recover on its judgement. Therefore, sufficient assets exist to enable ESI to satisfy its debt to the Company. In addition to ESI the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a $1.1 million judgement against Cannon and has likewise asserted a claim to the approximate $2.4 million frozen and held by the Court. Also the Justice Department has filed an action in the Southern District of New York seeking forfeiture of the entire $2.4 million amount. The Company believes the collectability of this debt is questionable. As of September 30, 2002 the Company has fully reserved against the debt. 4. CONVERTIBLE DEBT PAYABLE On November 27, 2001 the Company borrowed $250,000 from Roseann Solomon (John Solomon's widow) for which it issued a 10% convertible promissory note due on or before December 31, 2002. Interest expense in the amount of $1,333, $2,379 and $3,612 was accrued at March 31, 2002, December 31, 2001 and the period November 17, 1999 (Date of Formation) through March 31, 2002, respectively. At any time prior to maturity or prior to payment in full, the Note holder had the right to convert the unpaid portion of the note, together with accrued interest, into that number of shares of common stock of the Company at the then current market price per share and the Company and the Note holder each had the right to offset the unpaid principal balance of the note, together with accrued interest, for a certain promissory note dated May 31, 2001 between ESI and John A. Solomon. As part of the termination agreement with ESI, the Company received the John Solomon note, which it assigned to Roseann Solomon in complete satisfaction of its $250,000 obligation to her. 5. COMMON STOCK The Company has a single class of Common Stock with a par value of $0.0001 per share. There are 20 million shares authorized, and at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, 557,000 shares were issued and outstanding. The former president of the Company purchased 300,000 shares in November of 1999. Such shares were issued without registration in reliance on an exemption in federal securities laws that permit issuance of stock up to $1 million without registration of the securities. 11 In April 2001, Kelcon, Inc., a Delaware corporation, purchased 450,000 shares of common stock from former officers of the Company, effectively changing the ownership of the Company. 6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES License Agreement - ----------------- On April 16, 2002 the Company terminated its license agreement with ESI. MARKETING SERVICES AGREEMENT - ---------------------------- Effective November 1, 2001 ESI entered into a marketing services agreement with KCT Inc. ("KCT"). KCT was to provide consulting services to the Company for a minimum period of 120 days. The monthly fee was $15,000 for the first sixty days and $19,000 for the remaining sixty days. During the first quarter of 2002 the agreement was orally terminated and the Company believes it has no obligation in connection with the agreement. INVESTOR RELATIONS AGREEMENT - ---------------------------- On November 6, 2001 the Company entered into an agreement with Direct Development Group, LLC ("Direct"). Direct was to assist the Company, for a period of four months, as its investor relations and strategic communication consultant. Direct received a fee of $16,000. 7. PROPOSED ACQUISITION On July 9, 2002 the Company entered into a proposed merger agreement with Helvetia, a pharmaceutical company with facilities in the United States and Europe. As a condition precedent to the merger, the Company agreed to spin off its current operations. The Company also committed to effect a reverse split of its shares, reducing the outstanding common shares prior to the merger to 55,700 shares, which split the Company implemented. The Company was to issue Helvetia 8,843,548 common shares in exchange for 100% of the common shares of Helvetia. The transaction was to be accounted for as a reverse merger. The merger however was subject to due diligence by both parties. During due diligence the existence of issues impacting the merger were disclosed by Helvetia. As a result of those disclosures, the Company terminated the merger agreement on November 6, 2002. 12 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Plan of Operations FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS - -------------------------- Under the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company caution readers regarding forward looking statements found in this report and in any other statement made by or on its behalf. Forward looking statements are statements which are not based on historical information and which relate to future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. Forward looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the Company's control and many of which, with respect to future business decisions, are subject to change. These uncertainties and contingencies can affect actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward looking statements made by or on the Company's behalf. The Company disclaims any obligation to update forward looking statements. GENERAL - ------- Delta was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on November 17, 1999. Delta is a development stage company which initially intended to develop an Internet based mortgage services company. The Company was unable to secure sufficient financing to implement its initial business plan. On July 9, 2002 the Company entered into a proposed merger agreement with Helvetia , a pharmaceutical company. The Company terminated that agreement on November 6, 2002. The Company has insufficient capital with which to commence operational activities. The Company incurred, and will continue to incur, expense relating to its operations. Specifically, as long as the Company is required to file reports under the Securities Exchange Act, the Company will continue to incur accounting and legal fees relating to its filings. The Company enjoys the non-exclusive use of office, telecommunication and incidental supplies of stationery, provided by its president. As of the date of this report, the Company has not received any revenues and must rely entirely upon loans and equity investments from affiliates to pay operating expenses. 13 CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ISSUES - -------------------------- The Company's discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company's financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of the financial statements, requires the Company to make estimates and judgements that effect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to intangible assets, income taxes and contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgements about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgements and estimates used in the preparation of its financial statements. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of ESI to make the required payments on its note to the Company. The Company has fully reserved against this debt. PLAN OF OPERATION - ----------------- The Company is currently dependent on loans and investments from affiliates to pay its operating expenses. There are no assurances that such affiliates will continue to advance funds or invest in the Company's securities. In the event the Company is unable to obtain additional capital or funding the Company may be unable to pursue its business plan or consummate its proposed merger. The Company will need additional funding to effect such transaction. No other significant cash or funds are expected to be required. 14 The Company intends to seek to acquire assets or shares of an entity actively engaged in a business that generates revenues, in exchange for its securities. The Company intends to contact investment bankers, corporate financial analysts, attorneys and other investment industry professionals through various media. Prior to consummation of a proposed merger, the Company will provide its stockholders with such disclosure documentation concerning the business opportunity and the structure of the proposed business combination as is required by law. Due to the fact that the Company had no operations, it is anticipated that its cash requirements will be limited, and that all necessary capital, to the extent required, will be provided by its directors, officers and/or stockholders. The Company does not anticipate that it will have to raise capital or acquire any plant or significant equipment in the next twelve months unless funds are needed to complete the proposed merger. LIQUIDITY - --------- The Company has no current operations and have not generated any revenue. The Company must rely entirely on loans from affiliates to pay operating expenses. At September 30, 2002 the Company's working capital deficit was approximately $(109,000) and continued to operate at a loss. Since the Company has no source of revenue, its working capital deficit will continue to increase as it incurs additional operating expenses. Presently the Company has no external sources of cash and the Company is dependent upon its management and stockholders for funding. In November 2001, the Company borrowed $250,000 from Rosanne Solomon, the widow of Enterprise's former CEO. Such note was payable on or before December 31, 2002, with interest at 10%. Mrs. Solomon had the right to convert the outstanding balance of such note into shares of Delta's common stock at the market price per share on the date of conversion, and the Company had the right to pay off such note by delivery to her of the $750,000 note made by her late husband in consideration of cash advances by Enterprises. The Company did not have sufficient funds to pay off Mrs. Solomon's note, and on April 15, 2002, the Company acquired Mr. Solomon's note from Enterprises in exchange for assignment to Enterprises of certain keypads acquired from Panasonic. The Company used Mr. Solomon's note to pay off our $250,000 obligation to Mrs. Solomon. 15 The Company currently has a note receivable from ESI in the amount of $90,000. The note receivable is secured by the assets of ESI. The assets of ESI include a judgement ESI obtained against Herbert Cannon in the amount of $2.2 million. Approximately $2.4 million belonging to Herbert Cannon is held by Court order and by the District Court for the Southern District of New York. ESI has filed a claim against those funds to recover on its judgement. Therefore, sufficient assets exist to enable ESI to satisfy its debt to the Company. In addition to ESI the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a $1.1 million judgement against Cannon and has likewise asserted a claim to the approximate $2.4 million frozen and held by the Court. Also the Justice Department has filed an action in the Southern District of New York seeking forfeiture of the entire $2.4 million amount. The Company believes the collectability of this debt is questionable. As of September 30, 2002 the Company has fully reserved against the debt. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to obtain funds to meet our obligations on a timely basis, to identify and close an acquisition with a suitable target company, obtain additional financing or refinancing as may be required, and ultimately to attain profitability. There are no assurances that we will be able to identify a suitable acquisition target and close such acquisition, obtain any additional financing or, if we are able to obtain additional financing, that such financing will be on terms favorable to us. The inability to obtain additional financing when needed would have a material adverse effect on our operating results. The Independent Auditors' Report and Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2001 state that substantial doubt has been raised about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company's present business operations do not generate any revenues with which to cover its expenses. The Company will have to acquire or merge with other business operations or severely reduce its expenses to remain viable and the Company cannot assure you that it will be able to do so. 16 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - --------------------- Nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to Nine months ended September 30, 2001 - ------------------------------------ During the nine months ended September 30, 2002 the Company incurred a net loss of approximately $151,000. Such loss is primarily attributed to professional expenses incurred in connection with the contemplated transaction with Enterprises, including preparation of the registration statement and information statement for the meeting of stockholders and a reserve for bad debt against the note receivable from ESI in the amount of $96,625. During the nine months ended September 30, 2001 the Company incurred a net loss of approximately $54,500. From inception (November 17, 1999) to September 30, 2002 the Company had a net loss of approximately $365,650. The Company is continuing to incur professional fees and other expenses. If the Company does not find a suitable acquisition target or other source of revenue, the Company will continue to incur net losses and may have to cease operations entirely. This factor, among others raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Three months ended September 30, 2002 compared to Three months ended September 30, 2001 ------------------------------------- During the three months ended September 30, 2002 the Company incurred a net loss of approximately $2,100. Such loss is primarily attributed to professional expenses incurred in connection with the contemplated transaction with Enterprises, including preparation of the registration statement and information statement for the meeting of stockholders and a reserve for bad debt against the note receivable from ESI in the amount of $90,000. During the three months ended September 30, 2001 the Company incurred a net loss of approximately $28,700. Other Matters - ------------- New Accounting Pronouncements - ----------------------------- On June 29, 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Intangible Assets." The major provisions of SFAS No. 141 were as follows: all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 must use the purchase method of accounting; the pooling of interest method of accounting is prohibited. SFAS No. 142 eliminated the amortization of goodwill and other intangibles and requires an impairment test of their carrying value. An initial impairment test of goodwill and other intangibles must be completed in the year of adoption with at least an annual impairment test thereafter. On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142. The adoption of SFAS No. 142 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operation or financial position. 17 In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143 "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations". SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations and costs associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets. The Company is required to implement SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003. Management believes the effect of implementing this pronouncement will not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position. In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. Under SFAS No. 144 assets held for sale will be included in discontinued operations if the operations and cash flows will be or have been eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity and the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component. The Company adopted SFAS No. 144 on January 1, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position. In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145 "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections". This statement eliminates the automatic classification of gain or loss on extinguishment of debt as an extraordinary item of income and requires that such gain or loss be evaluated for extraordinary classification under the criteria of Accounting Principles Board No. 30 "Reporting Results of Operations". This statement also requires sales-leaseback accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sales-leaseback transactions, and makes various other technical corrections to existing pronouncements. This statement will be effective for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2003. Management believes that adopting this statement will not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations or financial position. In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." This Statement requires recording costs associated with exit or disposal activities at their fair values when a liability has been incurred. Under previous guidance, certain exit costs were accrued upon management's commitment to an exit plan. Adoption of this Statement is required with the beginning of fiscal year 2003. The Company has not yet completed the evaluation of the impact of adopting this Statement. On October 1, 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 147, "Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions." SFAS No. 147 removes acquisitions of financial institutions from the scope of FASB Statement No. 72, "Accounting for Certain Acquisitions of Banking or Thrift Institutions", and FASB Interpretation No. 9, "Applying APB Opinion Nos. 16 and 17 When a Savings and Loan Association or a Similar Institution is Acquired in a Business Combination Accounted for by the Purchase Method," and requires that those transactions be accounted for in accordance with FASB Statements Nos. 141 and 142. 18 Additionally, this Statement amends FASB Statement No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," to include in its scope long-term customer-relationship intangible assets of financial institutions such as depositor and borrower relationship intangible assets and credit cardholder intangible assets. Consequently, those intangible assets are subject to the same undiscounted cash flow recoverability test and impairment loss recognition and measurement provisions that Statement 144 requires for other long-lived assets that are held and used. This statement became effective on October 1, 2002 and did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position. Item 14. Controls and Procedures Within the 90 days prior to the date of this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company's periodic SEC filings. There have been no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 19 PART II - OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS There are no legal proceedings against the Company and the Company is unaware of such proceedings contemplated against it. ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES Not applicable. ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES Not applicable. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS Not applicable. ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION Not applicable Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K -------------------------------- (a) Exhibits: Exhibit 99.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Exhibit 99.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (b) There were no Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by the registrant during the quarter ended September 30, 2002. 20 SIGNATURES In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. DELTA MUTUAL, INC. BY: /s/ Kenneth Martin ---------------------- Kenneth Martin Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer Dated: November 13, 2002 21