UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|X| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2001
COMMISSION FILE NO. 33-62895
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
--------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MASSACHUSETTS 04-2664016
------------- ----------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02117
(617) 572-6000
(Address, including zip code, and
telephone number, including area code, of
Registrant's principal executive offices)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
NONE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Title of class)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
NONE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_|
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K |X| Not applicable.
The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a) and
(b) of Form 10K and is therefore filing this Form with the reduced disclosure
format.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Title of each class Shares Outstanding
Common Stock, $50.00 par value 50,000
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
-----------------------------------
NONE
----
CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS............................................... 1
PART I........................................................................ 1
ITEM 1. BUSINESS OF JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY......... 1
ITEM 1A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF REGISTRANT................................ 5
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES....................................................... 5
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS................................................ 5
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.............. 6
PART II....................................................................... 6
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.................... 6
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.......................................... 6
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS....................................... 6
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE INFORMATION ABOUT MARKET RISK......23
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA......................27
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.............................59
PART III......................................................................59
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.........................................59
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION..........................................59
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT.....................................................59
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS..................59
PART IV.......................................................................59
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES, AND
REPORTS ON FORM 8-K............................................59
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The statements, analyses, and other information contained herein relating
to trends in the John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company's (the Company's)
operations and financial results, the markets for the Company's products, the
future development of the Company's business, and the contingencies and
uncertainties to which the Company may be subject, as well as other statements
including words such as "anticipate," "believe," "plan," "estimate," "expect,"
"intend," "will," "should," "may," and other similar expressions, are
"forward-looking statements" under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. Such statements are made based upon management's current expectations
and beliefs concerning future events and their effects on the Company. Future
events and their effects on the Company may not be those anticipated by
management. The Company's actual results may differ materially from the results
anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties
including, but not limited to, the risks that (1) a significant downgrade in our
ratings for claims-paying ability and financial strength may lead to policy and
contract withdrawals and materially harm our ability to market our products; (2)
changes to or elimination of Federal tax benefits for our products and other
changes in laws and regulations (including those relating to the Federal Estate
Tax Laws) which the Company expects would adversely affect sales of our
insurance and investment advisory products; (3) we face increasing competition
in our retail businesses from mutual fund companies, banks and investment
management firms as well as from other insurance companies; (4) a decline or
increased volatility in the securities markets, and other economic factors, may
adversely affect our variable life insurance and variable annuity business; (5)
due to acts of terrorism or other hostilities, there could be business
disruption, economic contraction, increased mortality, morbidity and liability
risks, generally, or investment losses that could adversely affect our business;
(6) our life insurance and annuity sales are highly dependent on a third party
distribution relationship; (7) customers may not be responsive to new or
existing products or distribution channels, (8) interest rate volatility may
adversely affect our profitability; (9) our net income and revenues will suffer
if customers surrender annuities and variable and universal life insurance
policies; (10) we will face losses if the claims on our insurance products, or
reductions in rates of mortality on our annuity products, are greater than we
projected; (11) we face investment and credit losses relating to our investment
portfolio (12) we may experience volatility in net income due to changes in
standards for accounting for derivatives and other changes; (13) we are subject
to risk-based capital requirements and possible guaranty fund assessments; (14)
we may be unable to retain personnel who are key to our business; (15) we face
risks from ceded reinsurance business in respect to life insurance; (16)
litigation and regulatory proceedings may result in financial losses, harm our
reputation and divert management resources, and (17) we face unforeseen
liabilities arising from our acquisitions and dispositions of businesses.
Readers are also directed to other risks and uncertainties discussed, as
well as to further discussion of the risks described above, in other documents
that may be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission from time to time. The Company specifically disclaims any obligation
to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new
information, future developments, or otherwise.
PART I
ITEM 1. Business.
Business of John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company
John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company (the Company) is a stock life
insurance company, organized in 1979 under the laws of the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts. The Company commenced operations in 1980. Currently, the Company
writes term, whole, variable and universal life insurance policies and fixed and
variable annuity contracts in all states except New York. The Company is
wholly-owned by John Hancock Life Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as
John Hancock or the Parent) a life insurance company organized under the laws of
Massachusetts in 1862. Pursuant to a Plan of Reorganization approved by the
policyholders of John Hancock and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of
Insurance, effective February 1, 2000, John Hancock converted from a mutual life
insurance company to a stock life insurance company (i.e., demutualized) and
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of John Hancock Financial Services, Inc., which
is a holding company. In connection with the reorganization, John Hancock
changed its name to John Hancock Life Insurance Company. In addition, on
February 1, 2000, John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. completed its initial
public offering in which 102 million shares of common stock were issued at an
initial public offering price of $17 per share. At December 31, 2001, the
Company had $119.3 billion of gross life insurance in force.
1
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
The Company markets its policies through John Hancock's sales
organization, which includes a career agency system composed of
company-supported independent general agencies, and various unaffiliated
broker-dealers and certain financial institutions with which John Hancock and
the Company have sales agreements.
In 1993, the Company acquired Colonial Penn Annuity and Life Insurance
Company and renamed it John Hancock Life Insurance Company of America. On March
5, 1998, the name was changed from John Hancock Life Insurance Company of
America to Investors Partner Life Insurance Company (IPL).
Competition
The life insurance business is highly competitive. There are numerous
stock and other types of insurers in the life/health insurance business in the
United States.
Rating agency data through December 31, 2001, affirms the Company's
financial stability rating from A.M. Best Company, Inc. of A++, its highest,
based on the strength of John Hancock and the capital guarantee discussed below.
Standard & Poor's Corporation and Fitch, Inc. have assigned insurance
claims-paying ability ratings to the Company of AA+ and AAA, respectively, which
place the Company in the second highest and highest categories, respectively, by
these rating agencies. Moody's Investors Service, Inc. has assigned the Company
a financial strength rating of Aa2, which is its third highest rating.
Regulation
General
Our business is subject to extensive regulation at both the state and
Federal level, including regulation under state insurance and Federal and state
securities laws.
State Insurance Regulation
The Company complies with extensive state regulation in the jurisdictions
in which it does business. Most states have laws and regulations governing such
issues as: what lines of business a company may engage in; underwriting
practices, including a company's ability to request results of applicants'
genetic tests; what premium rates may be charged in various lines of business;
what products a company may sell; mandating certain insurance benefits and
policy forms; minimum rates for accumulation of cash values and maximum rates
for policy loans; licensing of insurance companies and agents; advertising and
marketing practices; statutory accounting and reporting requirements; reserve
requirements and solvency standards; admitted statutory assets; the appropriate
mix of investments; dividend payments; transactions with affiliates; and level
of ownership regarding acquisitions of control. State insurance departments
periodically review the business and operations of an insurance company by
examining its financial condition and how its agents sell its products.
State insurance regulatory authorities and other state law enforcement
agencies and attorneys general from time to time make inquiries concerning
whether our insurance business is in compliance with applicable regulations. We
reasonably and promptly respond to such inquiries and take corrective action if
warranted.
State insurance regulators and the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners are continually re-examining existing laws and regulations. Among
other things, these laws and regulations may focus on insurance company
investments, financial reporting and solvency issues, risk-adjusted capital
guidelines, interpretations of existing laws, the development of new laws, the
implementation of non-statutory guidelines and the circumstances under which
dividends may be paid.
Regulation Governing Potential Acquisitions of Control
We are subject to regulation under the insurance holding company statutes
of Massachusetts, which is our state of domicile. The Massachusetts insurance
law contains provisions which, in general, provide that the acquisition or
change of "control" of a domestic insurer or of any person that controls a
domestic insurer cannot be consummated without the prior approval of the
Massachusetts Commissioner of Insurance. In general, a presumption of "control"
arises from the ownership, control, possession with the power to vote or
possession of proxies with respect to, 10% or more of the voting securities of
an insurer or of a person that controls an insurer. A person seeking to acquire
control, directly or indirectly, of a Massachusetts insurance company or of any
person controlling a Massachusetts insurance company must file an application
for approval of the acquisition of control with the Massachusetts
2
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Commissioner of Insurance and obtain the approval of the Massachusetts
Commissioner of Insurance before consummating the acquisition.
Surplus and Capital Requirements
Insurance regulators have the discretionary authority, in connection with
the ongoing licensing of our insurance businesses, to limit or prohibit the
ability to issue new policies if, in the regulators' judgment, the insurer is
not maintaining a minimum amount of surplus or is in hazardous financial
condition. Limits may also be established on the ability to issue new life
insurance policies and annuity contracts above an amount based upon the face
amount and premiums of policies of a similar type issued in the prior year.
Risk-Based Capital
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has established
risk-based capital (RBC) standards for life insurance companies as well as a
model act to apply such standards at the state level. The model act provides
that life insurance companies must submit an annual risk-based capital report to
state regulators reporting their risk-based capital based on five categories of
risk: asset risk-affiliates, asset risk-other, insurance risk, interest rate
risk and business risk. The formula is intended to be used by insurance
regulators as an early warning tool to identify possible weakly capitalized
companies for purposes of initiating further regulatory action.
In 2001, the NAIC changed the risked-based capital formula which resulted
in RBC charges or a higher risk-based capital ratio. The most significant change
made by NAIC is to tax effect the RBC, which is similar to reducing the risk
factors being applied to the different risk categories. One other change was the
creation of a common stock asset risk category and its treatment in the
covariance calculation. This change also lowered RBC.
Statutory Investment Valuation Reserves
Life insurance companies are required to establish an asset valuation
reserve (AVR) consisting of two components: (i) a "default component," which
provides for future credit-related losses on fixed maturity investments, and
(ii) an "equity component," which provides for losses on all types of equity
investments, including equity securities and real estate. Insurers also are
required to establish an interest maintenance reserve (IMR) for net realized
capital gains and losses on fixed maturity securities, net of tax, related to
changes in interest rates. The IMR is required to be amortized into statutory
earnings on a basis reflecting the remaining period to maturity of the fixed
maturity securities sold. These reserves are required by state insurance
regulatory authorities to be established as a liability on a life insurer's
statutory financial statements, but do not affect our financial statements
prepared in accordance with GAAP. Although future additions to AVR will reduce
the future statutory capital and surplus of the Company, we do not believe that
the impact under current regulations of such reserve requirements will
materially affect the ability of the Company to increase its statutory capital
and surplus.
IRIS Ratios
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners has developed a set of
financial tests known as the Insurance Regulatory Information System (IRIS) for
early identification of companies which may require special attention by
insurance regulators. Insurance companies submit data on an annual basis to the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners. This data is used to calculate
ratios covering various categories of financial data, with defined "usual
ranges" for each category. IRIS consists of 13 key financial ratios for life
insurance companies. An insurance company may fall out of the usual range with
respect to one or more ratios because of specific transactions that are in
themselves immaterial or eliminated at the consolidated level. Departure from
the usual range on four or more of the ratios may lead to inquiries from
individual states' insurance departments. During the five-year period ended
December 31, 2001, John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company and its
subsidiary, Investors Partner Life Insurance Company, had several ratios
outside of the usual range. John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company had
eight unusual ratios, all of which resulted from growth in the business and the
effect of reinsurance contracts with John Hancock Life Insurance Company.
Investors Partner Life Insurance Company had ten unusual ratios due to the fact
it writes no new business.
Regulation of Investments
Our insurance businesses are subject to state laws and regulations that
require diversification of their investment portfolios. Some of these laws and
regulations also limit the amount of investments in specified investment
categories, such as below investment grade fixed maturity securities, equity
real estate, other equity investments and derivatives. Failure to comply with
these laws and regulations would cause investments exceeding regulatory
limitations to be treated as nonadmitted assets for purposes of measuring
statutory surplus, in some instances,
3
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
requiring divestiture. State regulatory authorities from the domiciliary states
of our insurance subsidiaries have not indicated any non-compliance with any
such regulations.
Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners has adopted a revision
to the Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation (known as Revised
XXX). This model regulation established new minimum statutory reserve
requirements for certain individual life insurance policies written in the
future. Before the new reserve standards can become effective, individual states
must adopt the model regulation. Massachusetts adopted the Regulation effective
January 1, 2001.
Federal Insurance Initiatives and Legislation
Although the Federal government generally does not directly regulate the
insurance business, federal initiatives often have an impact on our business.
Current and proposed measures that may significantly affect the insurance
business generally include limitations on anti-trust immunity, minimum solvency
requirements and health care reform.
On November 12, 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 became law,
implementing fundamental changes in the regulation of the financial services
industry in the United States. The act permits the transformation of the already
converging banking, insurance and securities industries by permitting mergers
that combine commercial banks, insurers and securities firms under one holding
company. Under the act, national banks retain their existing ability to sell
insurance products in some circumstances. In addition, bank holding companies
that qualify and elect to be treated as "financial holding companies" may engage
in activities, and acquire companies engaged in activities, that are "financial"
in nature or "incidental" or "complementary" to such financial activities,
including acting as principal, agent or broker in selling life, property and
casualty and other forms of insurance, including annuities. A financial holding
company can own any kind of insurance company or insurance broker or agent, but
its bank subsidiary cannot own the insurance company. Under state law, the
financial holding company would need to apply to the insurance commissioner in
the insurer's state of domicile for prior approval of the acquisition of the
insurer, and the act provides that the commissioner, in considering the
application, may not discriminate against the financial holding company because
it is affiliated with a bank. Under the act, no state may prevent or interfere
with affiliations between banks and insurers, insurance agents or brokers, or
the licensing of a bank or affiliate as an insurer or agent or broker.
On October 26, 2001, the International Money Laundering Abatement and
Anti-Terrorist Financing Act of 2001 was enacted into law as part of the USA
PATRIOT Act. Among its many provisions the law requires that financial
institutions adopt anti-money laundering programs that include policies,
procedures and controls to detect and prevent money laundering, designate a
compliance officer to oversee the program and provide for employee training, and
periodic audits in accordance with regulations to be issued by the U.S. Treasury
Department. The Company is actively developing a program in order to fully
comply with the applicable provisions of the Act and the related Treasury
Regulations.
Tax Legislation
Currently, under the Internal Revenue Code, holders of many life insurance
and annuity products, including both traditional and variable products, are
entitled to tax-favored treatment on these products. For example, income tax
payable by policyholders on investment earnings under traditional and variable
life insurance and annuity products which are owned by natural persons is
deferred during the product's accumulation period and is payable, if at all,
only when the insurance or annuity benefits are actually paid or to be paid.
Also, for example, interest on loans up to $50,000 secured by the cash value of
life insurance policies owned by businesses on key employees is eligible for
deduction even though investment earnings during the accumulation period are
tax-deferred.
In the past, legislation has been proposed that would have curtailed the
tax-favored treatment of some of our insurance and annuity products. If any such
proposals were enacted, market demand for such products would be adversely
affected. In addition, the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of
2001 (EGTRRA), enacted by Congress in 2001, provides for the gradual reduction
and eventual elimination of Federal estate taxes by the year 2010. But EGTRRA
also contains a sunset provision which would reinstate Federal estate taxes in
the year 2011, based on the Internal Revenue Code in effect prior to the
enactment of EGTRRA. Many insurance products are designed and sold to help
policyholders reduce the effect of Federal estate taxation on their estates. The
enactment of EGTRRA has adversely affected sales of certain of our insurance and
investment advisory products, but this effect is mitigated somewhat by the
sunset provision. If the sunset provision of EGTRRA is eliminated in the future,
the adverse affect on the sales of these products could increase. In addition,
sales of split dollar life
4
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
insurance products have been adversely affected by proposed changes being
considered by the Internal Revenue Service.
Securities Laws
All of our separate investment accounts that fund retail variable annuity
contracts and retail variable life insurance products issued by us, other than
those which fund private placement investment options that are exempt from
registration or support fixed rate investment options that are also exempt from
registration, are registered both under the Securities Act and the Investment
Company Act. Products sold to sophisticated investors as "private placements"
are exempt from registration under both acts but may be subject to other
requirements of those laws, such as antifraud provisions and the terms of
applicable exemptions.
ITEM 1A. Executive Officers of the Registrant
We qualify under the conditions set forth in General Instructions I(1)(a)
and (b) of Form 10-K and we are therefore filing this Form 10-K with reduced
disclosure format. Accordingly, Item 1a is not included in this Form 10-K.
The names of the executive officers of John Hancock Variable Life
Insurance Company and their respective positions, as of March 0xx1, 2002:
NAME AGE POSITION
David F. D'Alessandro 51 Chairman
Michele G. Van Leer 44 Vice Chairman and President
Ronald J. Bocage 56 Vice President and Counsel
Earl W. Baucom 55 Controller
ITEM 2. Properties.
Facilities
John Hancock provides the Company with property and facilities for the
performance of certain of the Company's corporate and operational functions.
John Hancock annually determines a fee for these properties and facilities based
on a number of criteria, which are revised annually to reflect continuing
changes in the Company's operations. The fee charged to the Company is included
in the parent company service fee disclosed in Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements.
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings.
We are regularly involved in litigation, both as a defendant and as a
plaintiff. The litigation naming us as a defendant ordinarily involves our
activities as a provider of insurance protection products, as well as an
employer and taxpayer. In addition, state regulatory bodies, the Unites States
Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulatory bodies regularly make
inquiries and, from time to time conduct examinations concerning our compliance
with, among other things, insurance laws and securities laws. We do not believe
that the ultimate resolution of the litigation referred to above or any of these
other matters that are currently pending, either individually or in the
aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition or results of operations.
5
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Sales Practice Class Action Settlement
Over the past several years, companies engaged in the life insurance
business have faced extensive claims, including class-action lawsuits, alleging
improper marketing and sales of individual life insurance policies or annuities.
On December 31, 1997, the United States District Court for the District of
Massachusetts approved a settlement of a nationwide class action lawsuit
regarding sales practices against John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company,
John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company and John Hancock Distributors,
Inc., captioned Duhaime, et al. v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company,
--------------------------------------------------------------
John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company and John Hancock Distributors, Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With certain limited exceptions, the class that is bound by the terms of the
settlement includes persons and entities who at any time during the class period
(January 1, 1979 through December 31, 1996) had an ownership interest in one or
more of our whole life, universal life or variable life insurance policies (and
certain annuities and mutual funds) issued during the class period.
In conjunction with this settlement, we had a total reserve that stood at
$7.0 million and $66.3 million at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. We
incurred settlement related costs of $14.1 million and $66.0 million in 2001 and
1999, respectively. No such costs were incurred in 2000. In 1999, the Company
updated its estimate of the cost of claims subject to alternative dispute
resolution (ADR) relief and revised its reserve estimate accordingly. The
reserve estimate was further evaluated quarterly, and was adjusted as noted
above in 2001. The adjustment to the reserve in 2001 was the result of the
Company being able to better estimate the cost of settling the remaining claims,
which on average tend to be the larger more complicated claims. The better
estimate is from experience with actual settlement of similar claims.
Administration of the ADR component of the settlement continues to date.
Although some uncertainty remains as to the cost of claims in the final phase
(i.e. arbitration) of the ADR process, it is expected that the final cost of the
settlement will not differ materially from the amounts presently provided for by
the Company.
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Item omitted in accordance with General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10K.
PART II
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.
Not applicable.
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data.
Item omitted in accordance with General Instruction I(2)(a) of Form 10K.
ITEM 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations.
Management's discussion and analysis reviews our consolidated and segment
financial condition as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and results of operations
for the years ended, December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 and, where appropriate,
factors that may affect future financial performance. This discussion should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Forward-Looking Information
The statements, analyses, and other information contained herein relating
to trends in the John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company's (the Company's)
operations and financial results, the markets for the Company's products, the
future development of the Company's business, and the contingencies and
uncertainties to which the Company may be subject, as well as other statements
including words such as "anticipate," "believe," "plan," "estimate," "expect,"
"intend," "will," "should," "may," and other similar expressions, are
"forward-looking statements" under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. Such statements are made based upon management's current expectations
and beliefs concerning future events and their effects on the Company. Future
6
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
events and their effects on the Company may not be those anticipated by
management. The Company's actual results may differ materially from the results
anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties
including, but not limited to, the risks that (1) a significant downgrade in our
ratings for claims-paying ability and financial strength may lead to policy and
contract withdrawals and materially harm our ability to market our products; (2)
changes to or elimination of Federal tax benefits for our products and other
changes in laws and regulations (including those relating to the Federal Estate
Tax Laws) which the Company expects would adversely affect sales of our
insurance and investment advisory products; (3) we face increasing competition
in our retail businesses from mutual fund companies, banks and investment
management firms as well as from other insurance companies; (4) a decline or
increased volatility in the securities markets, and other economic factors, may
adversely affect our variable life insurance and variable annuity business; (5)
due to acts of terrorism or other hostilities, there could be business
disruption, economic contraction, increased mortality, morbidity and liability
risks, generally, or investment losses that could adversely affect our business;
(6) our life insurance and annuity sales are highly dependent on a third party
distribution relationship; (7) customers may not be responsive to new or
existing products or distribution channels, (8) interest rate volatility may
adversely affect our profitability; (9) our net income and revenues will suffer
if customers surrender annuities and variable and universal life insurance
policies; (10) we will face losses if the claims on our insurance products, or
reductions in rates of mortality on our annuity products, are greater than we
projected; (11) we face investment and credit losses relating to our investment
portfolio (12) we may experience volatility in net income due to changes in
standards for accounting for derivatives and other changes; (13) we are subject
to risk-based capital requirements and possible guaranty fund assessments; (14)
we may be unable to retain personnel who are key to our business; (15) we face
risks from ceded reinsurance business in respect to life insurance; (16)
litigation and regulatory proceedings may result in financial losses, harm our
reputation and divert management resources, and (17) we face unforeseen
liabilities arising from our acquisitions and dispositions of businesses.
Readers are also directed to other risks and uncertainties discussed, as
well as to further discussion of the risks described above, in other documents
that may be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission from time to time. The Company specifically disclaims any obligation
to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new
information, future developments, or otherwise.
Overview
We are a leading life insurance company providing a broad range of
products and services in one major business, the retail business, which offers
insurance protection and asset gathering products and services primarily to
retail consumers.
Our revenues are derived principally from:
o premiums on individual life insurance and annuities with life
contingencies;
o product charges from variable and universal life insurance products
and annuities;
o net investment income and net realized investment and other gains
(losses) on general account assets.
Our expenses consist principally of insurance benefits provided to
policyholders, interest credited on policyholders' account balances, dividends
to policyholders, other operating costs and expenses, which include commissions
and general business expenses, net of expenses deferred, amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs, and premium and income taxes.
Our profitability depends in large part upon: (1) the adequacy of our
product pricing, which is primarily a function of competitive conditions, our
ability to assess and manage trends in mortality and morbidity experience, our
ability to generate investment earnings and our ability to maintain expenses in
accordance with pricing assumptions; (2) the amount of assets under management;
and (3) the maintenance of our target spreads between the rate of earnings on
our investments and rates credited on policyholders' account balances. Overall,
financial market conditions have a significant impact on all these profit
drivers.
The sales and other financial results of our business over the last
several years have been affected by general economic and industry trends.
Variable products, including variable life insurance and variable annuities,
have
7
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
accounted for the majority of recent increases in total premiums and deposits
for the insurance industry as a result of the strong equity market growth in
recent years and the "baby boom" generation reaching its high-earnings years and
seeking tax-advantaged investments to prepare for retirement. This trend has
been challenged recently by fluctuations in stock market performance and we have
seen investors return to stable investment products. Our diverse distribution
network and product offerings will assist in the maintenance of assets and
provide for sales growth. Although sales of traditional life insurance products
have experienced continued declines, sales of fixed annuity products and
corporate owned life insurance have increased.
Premiums and deposits of our individual annuity products were $113.0
million, $94.3 million and $231.3 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999. Our total life
insurance product deposits were $1,540.7 million, $1,188.2 million and $1,000.8
million in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Critical Accounting Policies
General
We have identified the policies below as critical to our business
operations and understanding of our results of operation. For a detailed
discussion of the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1
in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Note that the application of
these accounting policies in the preparation of this report requires management
to use judgments involving assumptions and estimates concerning future results
or other developments including the likelihood, timing or amount of one or more
future transactions or events. There can be no assurance that actual results
will not differ from those estimates. These judgments are reviewed frequently by
senior management, and an understanding of them may enhance the reader's
understanding of the Company's financial statements and Management's Discussion
and Analysis.
Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
We amortize deferred policy acquisition costs on term life insurance
ratably with premiums. We amortize our deferred policy acquisition costs on our
annuity products and retail life insurance, other than term, based on a
percentage of the estimated gross profits over the life of the policies, which
are generally twenty years for annuities and thirty years for life policies. Our
estimated gross profits are computed based on assumptions related to the
underlying policies including mortality, lapse, expenses, and asset growth
rates. We amortize deferred policy acquisition costs such that the percentage of
gross profits to the amount of deferred policy acquisition costs amortized is
constant over the life of the policies.
Estimated gross profits are adjusted periodically to take into
consideration the actual experience to date and changes in the remaining gross
profits. When estimated gross profits are adjusted, we also adjust the
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs to maintain a constant
amortization percentage over the life of the policies. Our current estimated
gross profits include certain judgments concerning mortality, lapse and asset
growth that are based on a combination of actual company experience and
historical market experience of equity and fixed income returns. Short-term
variances of actual results from the judgments made by management can cause
quarter to quarter earnings impact.
Investment in Debt and Equity Securities
Impairments on our investment portfolio are recorded as a charge to income
in the period when the impairment is judged by management to occur. See the
discussion of Credit Risk in the Quantitative and Qualitative Information About
Market Risk section of this document for a more detailed discussion of the
judgments involved in determining impairments.
Certain of our fixed income securities classified as held-to-maturity and
available-for-sale are not publicly traded, and quoted market prices are not
available from brokers or investment bankers on these securities. The change in
the fair value of the available-for-sale securities is recorded in other
comprehensive income as an unrealized gain or loss. We calculate the fair value
of these securities ourselves through the use of pricing models and discounted
cash flows calling for a substantial level of management's judgment. See the
discussion in the General Account Investments section of this document for a
more detailed discussion of this process and the judgments used therein.
8
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Income Taxes
We establish reserves for possible penalty and interest payments to
various taxing authorities with respect to the admissability and timing of tax
deductions. Management makes judgments concerning the eventual outcome of these
items and reviews those judgments on an ongoing basis.
Results of Operations
The table below presents our consolidated results of operations for the
years indicated.
For the Year Ended December 31
2001 2000 1999
--------------------------------
(in millions)
Revenues
Premiums $ 60.1 $ 28.6 $ 8.9
Universal life and investment-type product charges 365.4 337.1 341.5
Net investment income 227.0 213.4 174.6
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of
related amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs (1) (9.0) (10.6) (4.8)
Other revenues 24.0 0.2 0.2
--------------------------------
Total revenues 667.5 568.7 520.4
--------------------------------
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders 294.1 248.6 260.5
Other operating costs and expenses 76.2 116.8 117.5
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, excluding
amounts related to net realized investment and other
gains (losses) (2) 67.1 34.0 13.1
Dividends to policyholders 21.4 26.1 25.7
--------------------------------
Total benefits and expenses 458.8 425.5 416.8
--------------------------------
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change 208.7 143.2 103.6
Income taxes 62.2 43.8 35.2
--------------------------------
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change 146.5 99.4 68.4
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax (1.6) -- --
--------------------------------
Net income $144.9 $ 99.4 $ 68.4
================================
(1) Net of related amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs of $(1.5)
million, $(3.8) million, and $(0.5) million for the years ended 2001, 2000, and
1999, respectively.
(2) Excluding amounts related to net realized investment and other gains
(losses) of $(1.5) million, $(3.8) million, and $(0.5) million for the years
ended 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000
Consolidated income before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change of $208.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2001
increased by $65.5 million, or 45.7%, as compared to consolidated income before
income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change of $143.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2000. The increase was primarily attributable to
increases in income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting
change of $45.4 million in the Protection Segment and $20.1 million in the Asset
Gathering Segment. The increase in the Protection Segment was primarily due to
growth in universal life investment-type product
9
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
charges and net investment income and a decrease in operating expenses due to
our expense reduction program. The Asset Gathering Segment increased compared to
the prior year due to fee income received from its parent company related to the
safe harbor annuity exchange program and a decrease in operating expenses due to
our expense reduction program.
Revenues of $667.5 million increased $98.8 million, or 17.4%, from $568.7
million in the comparable prior year period. The increase in revenues was
largely driven by growth in premiums in the traditional life insurance business,
which increased $31.5 million. In addition, universal life and investment-type
product charges increased $28.3 million, primarily driven by growth in the
non-traditional life insurance business partially offset by lower fees in the
variable annuity business due to lower average account balances. Other revenue
increased $23.8 million from the comparable prior year period primarily due to
the sale of certain annuity contracts by the Company to its parent at fair value
as a part of the safe harbor annuity exchange program.
Benefits and expenses of $458.8 million increased $33.3 million, or 7.8%,
from $425.5 million from the comparable prior year period. The increase in
benefits and expenses was primarily driven by growth in benefits to
policyholders of $45.5 million due to growth in the in-force in the traditional
and non-traditional life insurance businesses. In addition, amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs increased $33.1 million driven by the
non-traditional life insurance business due to an increase in universal life
product charges. These increases in benefits and expenses were partially offset
by a $40.6 million decrease in other operating costs and expenses driven by cost
reduction programs.
Income taxes were $62.2 million in 2001, compared to $43.8 million for
2000. Our effective tax rate was 29.8% in 2001, as compared to 30.6% in 2000.
Year Ended December 31, 2000 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1999
Consolidated income before income taxes of $143.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2000 increased by $39.6 million, or 38.2%, as compared to
consolidated income before income taxes of $103.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 1999. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in
income before income taxes of $40.2 million in the Protection Segment partially
offset by decreased income before income taxes in the Asset Gathering Segment of
$0.6 million. The increase in the Protection Segment was primarily due to growth
in net investment income and a decrease in benefits to policyholders. The Asset
Gathering Segment remained stable compared to the prior year primarily due to
growth in investment-type product charges partially offset by increased
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs.
Revenues of $568.7 million increased $48.3 million, or 9.3%, from $520.4
million in the comparable prior year period. The increase in revenues was driven
by growth in net investment income of $38.8 million, primarily in the
non-traditional life insurance business. In addition, premiums increased $19.7
million, primarily in the traditional life insurance business. The increases in
revenues were partially offset by increased net realized investment and other
losses and lower universal life and investment-type product charges.
Benefits and expenses of $425.5 million increased $8.7 million, or 2.1%,
from $416.8 million in the comparable prior year period. The increase in
benefits and expenses was driven by an increase in amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs of $20.9 million primarily in the non-traditional life
insurance business. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased
in the non-traditional life insurance business by $13.2 million on revised
projections of estimated gross profit based on changes in estimated future
interest margins. In addition, amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
increased $7.9 million primarily due to poor separate account performance and
increased surrenders in the variable annuities business which accelerated
current amortization. Partially offsetting the increase in amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs was a decrease in benefits to policyholders of
$11.9 million, or 4.6%, primarily due to costs incurred related to the
settlement of the class action lawsuit in the prior year period.
Income taxes were $43.8 million in 2000, compared to $35.2 million for
1999. Our effective tax rate was 30.6% in 2000, as compared to 34.0% in 1999.
Results of Operations by Segment
We operate our business in two business segments, the Protection Segment
and the Asset Gathering Segment. Both of our business segments primarily serve
retail customers. The Company's reportable segments are strategic business units
offering different products and services, and are managed separately, as they
focus on different products, markets or distribution channels.
10
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Protection Segment. Offers a variety of individual life insurance,
including participating whole life, term life, universal life and variable life
insurance. Products are distributed through multiple distribution channels,
including insurance agents and brokers and alternative distribution channels
that include banks, financial planners, direct marketing and the Internet.
Asset Gathering Segment. Offers individual variable annuities . This
segment distributes its products through distribution channels including
insurance agents and brokers affiliated with the Company, securities brokerage
firms, financial planners, and banks.
We evaluate segment performance on segment after-tax operating income,
which excludes the effect of net realized investment and other gains and losses
and other unusual or non-recurring events and transactions presented below as
after-tax adjustments. Segment after-tax operating income is determined by
adjusting generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) net income for net
realized investment and other gains and losses and certain other items which we
believe are not indicative of overall operating trends. While these items may be
significant components in understanding and assessing our consolidated financial
performance, we believe that the presentation of segment after-tax operating
income enhances the understanding of our results of operations by highlighting
net income attributable to the normal, recurring operations of the business.
However, segment after-tax operating income is not a substitute for net income
determined in accordance with GAAP.
A discussion of the adjustments to GAAP reported income, many of which
affect each operating segment, follows the table below. A reconciliation of
segment after-tax operating income, as adjusted, to GAAP reported net income
precedes each segment discussion.
For the Years Ended December 31
2001 2000 1999
--------------------------------
(in millions)
Segment Data: (1)
Segment after-tax operating income:
Protection Segment .................................. $130.0 $ 96.0 $108.0
Asset Gathering Segment ............................. 22.2 6.3 6.8
--------------------------------
Total segment after-tax operating income .......... 152.2 102.3 114.8
After-tax adjustments:
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net (5.6) (6.8) (3.1)
Surplus tax ......................................... 9.1 5.6 --
Class action lawsuit ................................ (9.2) -- (42.9)
Other demutualization related costs ................. -- (0.6) (0.4)
Restructuring charges ............................... -- (1.1) --
--------------------------------
Total after-tax adjustments ....................... (5.7) (2.9) (46.4)
--------------------------------
GAAP Reported:
Income before cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle ........................... 146.5 99.4 68.4
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle.......................................... (1.6) -- --
--------------------------------
Net income ......................................... $144.9 $ 99.4 $ 68.4
================================
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" set forth below.
Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income
Our GAAP reported net income was affected by net realized investment gains
and losses and other unusual or non-recurring events and transactions presented
above as after-tax adjustments. A description of these adjustments follows.
11
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
In all periods, net realized investment and other gains and losses have
been excluded from segment after-tax operating income because such data are
often excluded by analysts and investors when evaluating the overall financial
performance of insurers.
Net realized investment and other gains and losses have been reduced by
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs to the extent that such
amortization results from such gains and losses. We believe presenting net
realized investment and other gains and losses in this format provides
information useful in evaluating our operating performance. This presentation
may not be comparable to presentations made by other insurers. Summarized below
is a reconciliation of (a) net realized investment and other gains and losses
per the audited consolidated financial statements and (b) the adjustment made
for net realized investment and other gains to calculate segment after-tax
operating income for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999.
For the Years Ended December 31
---------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------ ------------ -------------
(in millions)
Net realized investment and other gains (losses)..................... $ (10.5) $(14.4) $ (5.3)
Less amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs related to net
realized investment and other gains (losses)...................... 1.5 3.8 0.5
---------------------------------------
Netrealized investment and other gains,
net of related amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs per audited
consolidated financial statements................................. (9.0) (10.6) (4.8)
Less income tax effect............................................... 3.4 3.8 1.7
---------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net - after-tax adjustment
to calculate segment after-tax operating income................... $ (5.6) $ (6.8) $ (3.1)
=======================================
Effective within the year 2000, the Company is no longer subject to the
surplus tax imposed on mutual life insurance companies and their wholly-owned
stock subsidiaries. During the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, the
Company recognized a reduction in equity based taxes of $9.1 million and $5.6
million, respectively, resulting from a revised estimated credit that was
excluded from after-tax operating income for these periods. No surplus tax was
incurred in the year ended 1999.
During 1997, the Company entered into a court-approved settlement relating
to a class action lawsuit involving certain individual life insurance policies
sold from 1979 through 1996. In entering into the settlement, the Company
specifically denied any wrongdoing. The total reserve held in connection with
the settlement to provide for relief to class members and for legal and
administrative costs associated with the settlement amounted to $7.0 million and
$66.3 million at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Costs incurred
related to the settlement were $14.1 million and $66.0 million in 2001 and 1999,
respectively. No such costs were incurred in 2000. The estimated reserve is
based on a number of factors, including the estimated cost per claim and the
estimated costs to administer the claims.
During 2000, the Company incurred expenses to improve its financial
analysis and financial reporting abilities which were made in conjunction with
the demutualization of John Hancock. These charges primarily included consulting
fees and planning and expense management costs. After-tax charges for these
other demutualization related costs were $0.6 million and $0.4 million for the
years ended December 31, 2000 and, 1999 respectively. No such costs were
incurred in the year ended December 31, 2001.
As part of John Hancock's on-going Competitive Position Project, the
Company has incurred restructuring charges to reduce costs and increase future
operating efficiency by consolidating portions of its operations. After-tax
restructuring costs were $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. The
Company incurred no such costs in the years ended December 31, 2001 and 1999.
12
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Protection Segment
The following table presents certain summary financial data relating to
the Protection Segment for the periods indicated.
For the Years Ended December 31
--------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
Operating Results:
Revenues
Premiums ................................................. $ 60.1 $ 28.6 $ 8.9
Universal life and investment-type product charges ....... 324.7 286.0 300.8
Net investment income .................................... 229.2 215.9 178.1
Other revenue ............................................ 0.3 0.3 0.2
------ ------ ------
Total revenues ......................................... 614.3 530.8 488.0
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders ................................ 271.3 242.2 192.3
Other operating costs and expenses ....................... 72.8 98.1 100.6
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs,
excluding amounts related to net realized investment and
other gains (losses) ................................... 46.6 17.6 4.6
Dividends to policyholders ............................... 21.4 26.1 25.7
------ ------ ------
Total benefits and expenses ............................ 412.1 384.0 323.2
Segment pre-tax operating income ............................ 202.2 146.8 164.8
Income taxes ................................................ 72.2 50.8 56.8
------ ------ ------
Segment after-tax operating income (1) ...................... 130.0 96.0 108.0
After-tax adjustments: (1)
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net .. (5.6) (6.8) (3.1)
Surplus tax ............................................ 9.1 5.4 --
Class action lawsuit, net .............................. (9.2) -- (42.9)
Other demutualization related costs .................... -- (0.5) (0.3)
Restructuring charges .................................. -- (1.1) --
------ ------ ------
Total after-tax adjustments .......................... (5.7) (3.0) (46.3)
------ ------ ------
GAAP Reported:
Income before cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle .................... 124.3 93.0 61.7
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle ...... (1.6) -- --
------ ------ ------
Net income ............................................... $122.7 $ 93.0 $ 61.7
====== ====== ======
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" included in this MD&A.
Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000
Segment after-tax operating income was $130.0 million in 2001, an increase
of $34.0 million, or 35.4%, from $96.0 million in 2000. Traditional life
insurance segment after-tax operating income increased $18.7 million primarily
resulting from increased premiums and lower operating expenses offset by
increased benefits to policyholders. Non-traditional life insurance segment
after-tax operating income increased $15.3 million, or 13.9%, primarily due to
higher fee income and an increase in net investment income offset by increased
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs.
13
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Total revenues were $614.3 million in 2001, an increase of $83.5 million,
or 15.7%, from $530.8 million in 2000. Premiums increased $31.5 million or
110.1%, primarily due to an increase in renewal premiums related to prior year
term life sales. Universal life and investment-type product charges consist
primarily of cost of insurance fees and separate account fees and were $324.7
million in 2001, an increase of $38.7 million, or 13.5% from $286.0 million in
2000. The increase was primarily due to growth in average account values and
variable life products fee increases. Net investment income increased $13.3
million, or 6.2%, primarily due to increased asset balances for non-traditional
life insurance products.
Total benefits and expenses were $412.1 million in 2001, an increase of
$28.1 million, or 7.3%, from $384.0 million in 2000. Benefits to policyholders
increased $29.1 million or 12.0%, primarily due to growth in the in-force for
both traditional and non-traditional life insurance products. In addition,
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased $29.0 million or
164.8%, due to a decline in separate account performance. Offsetting these
increases was a decrease in other operating costs and expenses of $25.3 million
due to ongoing cost reduction programs in both the traditional life insurance
and non-traditional life insurance segments. The segment's effective tax rate
increased to 35.7% in 2001 from 34.6% in 2000.
Year Ended December 31, 2000 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1999
Segment after-tax operating income was $96.0 million in 2000, a decrease
of $12.0 million, or 11.1%, from $108.0 million in 1999. Traditional life
insurance segment after-tax operating income decreased $11.5 million due to
higher benefits and expenses. Non-traditional life insurance segment after-tax
operating income decreased $0.5 million.
Total revenues were $530.8 million in 2000, an increase of $42.8 million,
or 8.8%, from $488.0 million in 1999. Traditional life insurance segment's
premiums increased $19.7 million, or 221.3% due to increase in term life sales.
Universal life and investment-type product charges consist primarily of cost of
insurance fees and separate account fees and were $286.0 million in 2000, a
decrease of $14.8 million, or 4.9%, from $300.8 million in 1999. The decrease
was primarily due to lower fees resulting from a decline in separate account
performance in 2000. Net investment income increased $37.8 million, or 21.2%,
primarily due to increases in average net invested assets for the
non-traditional life insurance segment.
Total benefits and expenses were $384.0 million in 2000, an increase of
$60.8 million, or 18.8%, from $323.2 million in 1999. Benefits to policyholders
increased $49.9 million, or 25.9%, primarily due to increase in reserves related
to growth in term life business for the traditional life insurance segment.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs of $17.6 million in 2000
increased $13.0 million, or 282.6%, from $4.6 million in 1999. Amortization
expense increased primarily due to revised projections of estimated gross
profits on non-traditional life insurance products based upon changes in
estimated future interest margins. The segment's effective tax rate increased to
34.6% in 2000 from 34.5% in 1999.
14
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Asset Gathering Segment
The following table presents certain summary financial data relating to
the Asset Gathering Segment for the periods indicated.
For the Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
----- ----- -----
(in millions)
Operating Results:
Revenues
Universal life and investment-type product charges .... $40.7 $51.1 $40.7
Net investment income ................................. (2.2) (2.5) (3.5)
Other revenue ......................................... 23.7 (0.1) --
----- ----- -----
Total revenues ...................................... 62.2 48.5 37.2
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders ............................. 8.7 6.4 2.2
Other operating costs and expenses .................... 3.4 16.1 16.3
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs,
excluding amounts related to net realized investment
and other gains (losses) ........................... 20.5 16.4 8.5
----- ----- -----
Total benefits and expenses ......................... 32.6 38.9 27.0
Segment pre-tax operating income ......................... 29.6 9.6 10.2
Income taxes ............................................. 7.4 3.3 3.4
----- ----- -----
Segment after-tax operating income (1) ................... 22.2 6.3 6.8
After-tax adjustments: (1)
Surplus tax ......................................... -- 0.2 --
Other demutualization related costs ................. -- (0.1) (0.1)
----- ----- -----
Total after-tax adjustments ......................... -- 0.1 (0.1)
----- ----- -----
Net income ............................................... $22.2 $ 6.4 $ 6.7
===== ===== =====
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" included in this MD&A.
Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000
Segment after-tax operating income was $22.2 million in 2001, an increase
of $15.9 million, or 252.4%, from $6.3 million in 2000. The increase in the
Asset Gathering Segment is primarily driven by growth in other revenue of $23.8
million and a decrease in other operating costs and expenses of $12.7 million
from the comparable prior year period. These changes were partially offset by a
decrease in investment-type product fees of $10.4 million and an increase in
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs of $4.1 million.
Total revenues increased $13.7 million, or 28.2%, to $62.2 million in 2001
from $48.5 million in 2000. Investment-type product charges decreased $10.4
million, or 20.4%. Investment-type product charges on variable annuity products
decreased due to deteriorating market conditions for separate accounts.
Partially offsetting the decline in average variable annuity reserves, the
Company increased its product fees in the fourth quarter of 2000, which were
effective for the year ended December 31, 2001. Other revenue increased $23.8
million from the comparable prior year period primarily due to the sale of
certain annuity contracts by the Company to its parent at fair value as a part
of the safe harbor annuity exchange program.
15
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Total benefits and expenses decreased $6.3 million, or 16.2%, to $32.6
million in 2001 from the comparable prior year period. The decrease in benefit
and expenses is primarily due to a $12.7 million decrease in other operating
costs and expenses resulting from our on-going cost reduction program. Partially
offsetting the decrease in other operating costs and expenses was a $4.1 million
increase in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and a $2.3 million
increase in benefits to policyholders. Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs increased primarily due to poor separate account performance
and increased surrenders in the variable annuity business in 2001. Benefits to
policyholders increased primarily due to higher surrender benefits on higher
lapses. The segment's effective tax rate was 25.0% and 34.4% in 2001 and 2000,
respectively. The change in the segment's effective tax rate is primarily due to
increased dividend received deductions in variable annuity separate accounts.
Year Ended December 31, 2000 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1999
Segment after-tax operating income was $6.3 million in 2000, a decrease of
$0.5 million, or 7.4%, from $6.8 million in 1999. The decrease in the Asset
Gathering Segment is primarily driven by an increase of $7.9 million in
amortization of deferred policy acquisitions costs and a $4.2 million increase
in benefits to policyholders, partially offset by growth in investment-type
product charges of $10.4 million from the comparable prior year period.
Total revenues increased $11.3 million, or 30.4%, to $48.5 million in 2000
from $37.2 million in 1999. Investment-type product charges increased $10.4
million, or 25.6%, primarily due to higher average account balances in 2000.
Total benefits and expenses increased $11.9 million, or 44.1%, to $38.9
million in 2000 from the comparable prior year period. The increase in benefits
and expenses was primarily driven by a $7.9 million increase in amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs and a $4.2 million increase in benefits to
policyholders. Benefits to policyholders increased $4.2 million, primarily due
to growth in the annuity business, including bonus interest on new variable
annuity products introduced in the fourth quarter of 1999. Amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs increased $7.9 million, or 92.9%, to $16.4
million in 2000 from $8.5 million in 1999, primarily due to poor separate
account performance and increased surrenders in the variable annuities business
which accelerated current amortization. The segment's effective tax rate was
34.4% and 33.3% in 2000 and 1999, respectively.
16
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
General Account Investments
Overall Composition of the General Account
Invested assets, excluding separate accounts, totaled $3.6 billion and
$3.0 billion as of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000, respectively. The
portfolio composition has not significantly changed at December 31, 2001 as
compared to December 31, 2000. The following table shows the composition of
investments in the general account portfolio.
As of December 31, As of December 31,
2001 2000
-----------------------------------------------------------
Carrying % of Carrying % of
Value Total Value Total
-----------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Fixed maturity securities (1)......... $2,496.2 69.0% $1,727.2 57.9%
Mortgage loans (2).................... 580.9 16.0 554.8 18.6
Real estate........................... 20.6 0.6 23.9 0.8
Policy loans (3)...................... 352.0 9.7 334.2 11.2
Equity securities..................... 13.1 0.4 8.1 0.3
Other invested assets................. 39.6 1.1 34.8 1.2
Short-term investments................ 0.0 0.0 21.7 0.7
Cash and cash equivalents (4)......... 115.4 3.2 277.3 9.3
-----------------------------------------------------------
Total invested assets ............. $3,617.8 100.0% $2,982.0 100.0%
===========================================================
(1) In addition to bonds, the fixed maturity security portfolio contains
redeemable preferred stock with a carrying value of $45.6 million and
$42.4 million as of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000, respectively.
The total fair value of the fixed maturity security portfolio was $2,494.6
and $1,698.6 million, at December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000,
respectively.
(2) The fair value of the mortgage loan portfolio was $604.3 million and
$467.3 million as of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000,
respectively.
(3) Policy loans are secured by the cash value of the underlying life
insurance policies and do not mature in a conventional sense, but expire
in conjunction with the related policy liabilities.
(4) Cash and cash equivalents are included in total invested assets for the
purposes of calculating yields on the income producing assets for the
Company.
Consistent with the nature of the Company's product liabilities, assets
are heavily oriented toward fixed maturity securities. The Company determines
the allocation of assets primarily on the basis of cash flow and return
requirements of its products and by the level of investment risk.
Fixed Maturity Securities. The fixed maturity securities portfolio is
predominantly comprised of low risk, investment grade, publicly and privately
traded corporate bonds and senior tranches of asset-backed securities (ABS) and
mortgage-backed securities (MBS), with the balance invested in government bonds.
The fixed maturity securities portfolio also includes redeemable preferred
stock. As of December 31, 2001, fixed maturity securities represented 69.0% of
general account investment assets with a carrying value of $2.5 billion, roughly
comprised of 61% public securities and 39% private securities. Each year the
Company directs the majority of its net cash inflows into investment grade fixed
maturity securities. Typically between 5% and 15% of funds allocated to fixed
maturity securities are invested in below-investment-grade bonds while
maintaining a policy to limit the overall level of these bonds to no more than
10% of invested assets and the majority of that balance are rated BB, or
category 3 the highest Securities Valuation Office quality rating below
investment grade. Allocations are based on an assessment of relative value and
the likelihood of enhancing risk-adjusted portfolio returns. While the Company
has profited from the below-investment-grade asset class in the past, care is
taken to manage its growth strategically by limiting its size relative to the
Company's net worth.
17
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
The following table shows the composition by issuer of the fixed maturity
securities portfolio.
Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Issuer
As of December 31, As of December 31,
2001 2000
------------------------------------------------------
Carrying % of Carrying % of
Value Total Value Total
------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Corporate securities....................... $1,955.8 78.3% $1,428.6 82.7%
MBS/ABS.................................... 317.1 12.7% 268.2 15.5%
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies................ 214.8 8.6% 16.7 1.0%
Debt securities issued by foreign
Governments............................. 7.6 0.3% 10.9 0.6%
Obligations of states and political
Subdivisions............................ 0.9 0.1% 2.8 0.2%
------------------------------------------------------
Total...................................... $2,496.2 100.0% $1,727.2 100.0%
======================================================
In keeping with the investment philosophy of tightly managing interest
rate risk, the Company's MBS & ABS holdings are heavily concentrated in
commercial MBS where the underlying loans are largely call protected, which
means they are not pre-payable without penalty prior to maturity at the option
of the issuer. By investing in MBS and ABS securities with relatively
predictable repayments, the Company adds high quality, liquid assets to the
portfolios without incurring the risk of cash flow variability.
The Securities Valuation Office (SVO) of the National Association of
Insurance Commissioners evaluates all public and private bonds purchased as
investments by insurance companies. The SVO assigns one of six investment
categories to each security it reviews. Category 1 is the highest quality
rating, and Category 6 is the lowest. Categories 1 and 2 are the equivalent of
investment grade debt as defined by rating agencies such as Standard & Poors
(S&P) and Moody's (i.e., BBB-/Baa3 or higher), while Categories 3-6 are the
equivalent of below-investment grade securities. SVO ratings are reviewed and
may be revised at least once a year.
The following table sets forth the SVO ratings for the Company's bond
portfolio along with an equivalent S&P rating agency designation. The majority
of bonds are investment grade, with 87.7% invested in Category 1 and 2
securities as of December 31, 2001. Below investment grade bonds were 12.3 % of
fixed maturity securities and 8.4% of total invested assets as of December 31,
2001. This allocation reflects the Company's strategy of avoiding the
unpredictability of interest rate risk in favor of relying on the bond analysts'
ability to better predict credit or default risk. The bond analysts operate in
an industry-based, team-oriented structure that permits the evaluation of a wide
range of below investment grade offerings in a variety of industries resulting
in a well-diversified high yield portfolio. A majority, 62.9% of our below
investment grade bonds are rated BB, or category 3, the highest quality below
investment grade. Category 6 bonds, those in or near default, represent
securities that were originally acquired as long-term investments, but
subsequently became distressed.
Valuation techniques for the bond portfolio vary by security type and the
availability of market data. Pricing models and their underlying assumptions
impact the amount and timing on unrealized gains and losses recognized, and the
use of different pricing models or assumptions could produce different financial
results. External pricing services are used where available, broker dealer
quotes are used for thinly traded securities, and a spread pricing matrix is
used when price quotes are not available. When utilizing the spread pricing
matrix, securities are valued by utilizing a discounted cash flow method where
each bond is assigned a spread, that is added to the current U.S. Treasury rates
to discount the cash flows of the security. The spread assigned to each security
is derived from external market data. Certain market events that could impact
the valuation of securities include issuer credit ratings, business climate,
management changes, litigation, and government actions among others. The
Company's pricing analysts take appropriate actions to reduce valuations of
securities where such an event occurs which negatively impacts the securities'
value. To the extent that bonds have longer maturity dates, management's
estimate of fair value may involve greater subjectivity since they involve
judgment about events well into the future.
18
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Credit Quality
As of December 31, As of December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000
-------------------------------------------------------------
SVO S&P Equivalent Carrying % of Carrying % of
Rating (1) Designation (2) Value (3) Total Value (3) Total
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
1 AAA/AA/A............................ $ 910.4 37.2% $ 634.2 37.6%
2 BBB................................. 1,237.9 50.5 774.5 46.0
3 BB.................................. 190.2 7.8 187.2 11.1
4 B................................... 59.7 2.4 61.4 3.7
5 CCC and lower....................... 27.7 1.1 9.2 0.5
6 In or near default.................. 24.7 1.0 18.3 1.1
-------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... $2,450.6 100.0% $1,684.8 100.0%
=============================================================
(1) For securities that are awaiting an SVO rating, the Company has assigned a
rating based on an analysis that it believes is equivalent to that used by
the SVO.
(2) Comparisons between SVO and S&P ratings are published by the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners.
(3) Does not include redeemable preferred stock with a carrying value of $45.6
million and $42.4 million as of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000,
respectively.
Mortgage Loans. As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, we held mortgage loans with
carrying values of $0.6 billion, which included $0.2 billion of agricultural
loans.
The following table shows the distribution of the Company's mortgage loan
portfolio by property type as of the dates indicated. The Company's commercial
mortgage loan portfolio consists primarily of non-recourse fixed-rate mortgages
on fully, or nearly fully, leased commercial properties.
As of December 31,
------------------
2001 2000
----------------------------------------------
Carrying % of Carrying % of
Value Total Value Total
----------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Apartments...................... $114.4 19.7% $128.3 23.1%
Office Buildings................ 145.3 25.0 98.0 17.8
Retail.......................... 35.3 6.1 45.4 8.2
Agricultural.................... 166.3 28.6 163.9 29.5
Industrial...................... 71.6 12.3 76.8 13.8
Hotels.......................... 24.6 4.2 15.0 2.7
Mixed Use....................... 4.9 0.9 13.4 2.4
Other........................... 18.5 3.2 14.0 2.5
----------------------------------------------
Total...................... $580.9 100.0% $554.8 100.0%
==============================================
The following table shows the distribution of the Company's mortgage loan
portfolio by geographical region.
19
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Mortgage Loans - By ACLI Region
As of December 31,
------------------
2001 2000
------------------------------------------------------
Number Carrying % of Carrying % of
of Loans Value Total Value Total
------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
East North Central....... 18 $ 63.1 10.9% $ 67.6 12.2%
East South Central....... 17 24.3 4.2 27.5 5.0
Middle Atlantic.......... 12 50.3 8.6 26.8 4.8
Mountain................. 13 35.3 6.1 35.4 6.4
New England.............. 13 54.7 9.4 44.2 8.0
Pacific.................. 48 110.5 19.0 119.3 21.5
South Atlantic........... 41 151.7 26.1 155.2 28.0
West North Central....... 6 20.5 3.5 16.8 3.0
West South Central....... 21 67.3 11.6 58.8 10.5
Canada................... 1 3.2 0.6 3.2 0.6
-----------------------------------------------------
Total............... 190 $580.9 100.0% $554.8 100.0%
=====================================================
The allowance for losses on mortgage loans on real estate and real estate
to be disposed of is maintained at a level that we believe to be adequate to
absorb estimated probable credit losses. The Company's periodic evaluation of
the adequacy of the allowance for losses is based on past experience, known and
inherent risks, adverse situations that may affect the borrower's ability to
repay (including the timing of future payments), the estimated value of the
underlying security, the general composition of the portfolio, current economic
conditions and other factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective and is
susceptible to significant changes and no assurance can be given that the
allowances taken will in fact be adequate to cover all losses or that additional
valuation allowances or asset write-downs will not be required in the future.
The portion of the investment valuation allowance for the Company's mortgage
loan portfolio was $5.5 million, or 0.9% of carrying value before reserves and
$5.0 million, or 0.9% of carrying value before reserves as of December 31, 2001
and 2000, respectively. The portion of the investment valuation allowance for
the Company's real estate to be disposed of was $0.8 million, or 3.9% of
carrying value before reserves and $0.7 million, or 2.9% of carrying value
before reserves as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Investment Results
The following table summarizes the Company's investment results for the
periods indicated. Overall, the yield, net of investment expenses, on the
general account portfolio decreased from the year ended December 31, 2001
compared to December 31, 2000. New cash flows in 2001 were invested at lower
rates than the prior year period which benefited from higher US Treasury rates
and wider spreads in both the public and private sector. Indicative of this
environment, the 10-year U.S. Treasury rate decreased 6 basis points from 2000
to 2001, while Moody's seasoned BAA spreads decreased 24 basis points from 2000
to 2001.
The yield, net of investment expenses, on the general account portfolio
increased for the year ended December 31, 2000 compared to the prior year
period. The interest rate environment during this period is evidenced by the
increase in the 10-year U.S. Treasury rate of 34 basis points from December 31,
1999 to December 31, 2000.
20
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
For the Year Ended
December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions) (in millions)
General account assets-excluding policy loans
Gross income............................ 7.26% $ 214.6 8.23% $ 207.5 7.56% $ 172.8
Ending assets-excluding policy loans.... 3,265.8 2,647.8 2,397.2
Policy loans
Gross income............................ 6.15 21.1 5.50 17.1 5.08 13.7
Ending assets.............................. 352.0 334.2 287.4
Total gross income...................... 7.14 235.7 7.93 224.6 7.29 186.5
Less: investment expenses............. (8.7) (11.2) (11.9)
----------- ----------- ----------
Net investment income............... 6.88 $ 227.0 7.53 $ 213.4 6.83 $ 174.6
============ =========== ==========
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity describes the ability of a company to generate sufficient cash
flows to meet the cash requirements of business operations. Historically, the
Company's principal cash flow sources have been premiums, deposits and charges
on policies, investment income, maturing investments and proceeds from sales of
investment assets. In addition to the need for cash flow to meet operating
expenses, our liquidity requirements relate principally to the liabilities
associated with our various life insurance and annuity products and to the
funding of investments in new products, processes and technologies. Product
liabilities include the payment of benefits under life insurance, policies and
annuity contracts and the payment of policy surrenders, withdrawals and policy
loans. The Company periodically adjusts its investment policy to respond to
changes in short-term and long-term cash requirements and provide adequate funds
to pay benefits without forced sales of investments.
The liquidity of our insurance operations is also related to the overall
quality of our investments. As of December 31, 2001, $2,148.3 million, or 87.7%
of the fixed maturity securities held by us and rated by Standard & Poor's
Ratings Services, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (S&P) or the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners were rated investment grade (BBB
or higher by S&P or 1 or 2 by the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners). The remaining $302.3 million, or 12.3%, of fixed maturity
investments, and 8.4% of invested assets, were rated non-investment grade. For
additional discussion of our investment portfolio see the General Account
Investments section above in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Segment Operations.
We employ an asset/liability management approach tailored to the specific
requirements of each of our product lines. Each product line has an investment
strategy based on the specific characteristics of the liabilities in the product
line. As part of this approach, we develop investment policies and operating
guidelines for each portfolio based upon the return objectives, risk tolerance,
liquidity, and tax and regulatory requirements of the underlying products and
business segments.
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities was $314.2 million,
$(349.3) million, and $(459.4) million for the years ended December 31, 2001,
2000 and 1999, respectively. The increase in 2001 as compared to 2000 of $663.5
million resulted primarily from a decrease in benefits paid of $644.7 million
and decrease in operating costs and expenses paid of $74.9 million from the
prior year period. In addition, premiums received increased $25.7 million, fees
received increased $28.3 million, and net investment income received increased
by $16.7 million. The primary increase in cash provided by operations in 2000 as
compared to 1999 is primarily due to the net decrease in other assets and other
liabilities offset somewhat by a larger decrease in policy liabilities as
compared with prior year.
Net cash used in investing activities was $782.6 million, $269.5 million
and $101.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999,
respectively. The increase in net cash used in 2001 as compared to 2000 of
$513.1 million, resulted primarily from an increase in purchases of fixed
maturities of $565.5 million. Offsetting the cash used by increases in fixed
maturities purchases were increases in cash provided by the maturity, prepayment
and scheduled redemptions of short-term and other invested assets of $36.4
million and a decrease in purchases of mortgage loans of $15.5 million. The
increase in net cash used in 2000 as compared to 1999 resulted primarily from
21
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
an increase in fixed maturities purchases, offset somewhat by an increase in the
maturities, prepayments or scheduled redemptions of fixed maturities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $306.5 million, $636.5
million and $778.6 million, for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and
1999, respectively. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities in
2001 as compared to 2000 of $330.0 million resulted from increase in maturities
and withdrawals from universal life and investment-type contracts in excess of
increases in deposits. The decrease in 2000 as compared to 1999 is the result of
no financing activities in 2000, after the Company received a capital
contribution in 1999 and repaid its short-term notes payable. Increases in
deposits to universal life and investment-type contracts in 2000 as compared to
1999 approximately offset the increase in withdrawals and maturities.
A primary liquidity concern with respect to life insurance and annuity
products is the risk of early policyholder and contractholder withdrawal. The
following table summarizes our annuity policy reserves and deposit fund
liabilities for the contractholder's ability to withdraw funds for the indicated
periods:
As of December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000
--------------------------------------------------------
Amount % Amount %
--------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Subject to discretionary withdrawal at contract value less
surrender charge..................................... $45.4 75.0% $54.7 75.1%
Not subject to discretionary withdrawal provisions... 7.6 12.6 7.1 9.8
Subject to discretionary withdrawal adjustment:
At contract value................................. 7.5 12.4 11.0 15.1
--------------------------------------------------------
Total annuity reserves and deposit funds liability... $60.5 100.0% $72.8 100.0%
========================================================
Individual life insurance policies are less susceptible to withdrawal than
are individual annuity contract because policyholders in later policy years may
incur surrender charges and undergo a new underwriting process in order to
obtain a new insurance policy. As indicated in the table above, there is a
substantial percentage of annuity reserves and deposit fund liabilities that are
subject to discretionary withdrawal at the contract value less a surrender
charge. Of the remaining percentage, a little over half are not subject to
withdrawal. In addition, none of these obligations can be accelerated based on
any change in the Company's credit rating.
Individual life insurance policies (other than term life insurance)
increase in cash value over their lives. Policyholders have the right to borrow
from us an amount generally up to the cash value of their policy at any time. As
of December 31, 2001, we had approximately $7.1 billion in cash values in which
policyholders have rights to policy loans. The majority of cash values eligible
for policy loans are at variable interest rates which are reset annually on the
policy anniversary. Moreover, a portion of our fixed interest rate policy loans
have features that provide for reduced crediting rates on the portion of cash
values loaned. Policy loans were $352.0 million and $334.2 million at December
31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
The Company reviewed its financial information about contractual
obligations and commercial commitments by due date and expiration date as of
December 31, 2001. Contractual obligations of the Company are those obligations
fixed by agreement as to dollar amount and date of payment. Other commercial
commitments are those commitments entered into by the Company with known
expiration dates. The Company identified investment purchase commitments of
$55.8 million due in less than one year as its primary contractual obligation.
No other contractual obligation or commercial commitment was identified by the
Company.
The risk-based capital standards for life insurance companies, as
prescribed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, establish a
risk-based capital ratio comparing adjusted surplus to required surplus for each
of our United States domiciled insurance subsidiaries. If the risk-based capital
ratio falls outside of acceptable ranges, regulatory action may be taken ranging
from increased information requirements to mandatory control by the domiciliary
insurance department. The risk-based capital ratios of our insurance subsidiary
as of December 31, 2001, were above the ranges that would require regulatory
action.
We maintain reinsurance programs designed to protect against large or
unusual losses. Based on our review of our reinsurers' financial statements and
reputations in the reinsurance marketplace, we believe that our reinsurers are
22
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
financially sound, and, therefore, that we have no significant exposure to
uncollectable reinsurance in excess of uncollectable amounts already recognized
in our audited consolidated financial statements. The Company has also entered
into reinsurance agreements which transfers risks and profits to John Hancock
Life Insurance Company, the parent. The reinsurance agreements provide
reinsurance expense allowances to reimburse the Company for the related
expenses. The agreements cover variable annuity, variable life insurance and
term life insurance contracts issued by the Company.
Based on current trends, the Company expects to generate sufficient
positive operating cash to meet all short-term and long-term cash requirements.
In addition, the Company has a line of credit with John Hancock Capital
Corporation, a subsidiary of John Hancock Life Insurance Company, totaling $250
million. John Hancock Capital Corporation will commit, when requested, to loan
funds at prevailing interest rates as agreed to from time to time between John
Hancock Capital Corporation and the Company.
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Capital Markets Risk Management
The Company maintains a disciplined, comprehensive approach to managing
capital market risks inherent in its business operations. To mitigate these
risks, and effectively support Company objectives, investment operations are
organized and staffed to focus investment management expertise on specific
classes of investments, with particular emphasis placed on private placement
markets. In addition, a dedicated unit of asset/liability risk management (ALM)
professionals centralizes the implementation of its interest rate risk
management program. As an integral component of its ALM program, derivative
instruments are used in accordance with risk reduction techniques established
through Company policy and with formal approval granted from the New York
Insurance Department. The Company's use of derivative instruments is monitored
on a regular basis by the Parent's Investment Compliance Department and reviewed
quarterly with senior management and the Committee of Finance of the Parent,
(the Parent Company's Committee of Finance).
The Company's principal capital market exposures are credit and interest
rate risk, which includes the impact of inflation, although we have certain
exposures to changes in equity prices and foreign currency exchange rates.
Credit risk pertains to the uncertainty associated with the ability of an
obligor or counterparty to continue to make timely and complete payments of
contractual principal and interest. Interest rate risk pertains to the change in
fair value that occurs within fixed maturity securities or liabilities as market
interest rates move. Equity and foreign currency risk pertain to price
fluctuations, associated with the Company's ownership of equity investments or
non-US dollar denominated investments and liabilities, driven by dynamic market
environments.
Credit Risk
The Company manages the credit risk inherent in its fixed maturity
securities by applying strict credit and underwriting standards, with specific
limits regarding the proportion of permissible below investment grade holdings.
We also diversify our fixed maturity securities with respect to investment
quality and credit concentration. Concentrations are monitored with respect to
issuer, industry, geographic location, and loan property-type. Where possible,
consideration of external measures of creditworthiness, such as ratings assigned
by nationally recognized rating agencies, supplement our internal credit
analysis. The Company uses simulation models to examine the probability
distribution of credit losses to ensure that it can readily withstand feasible
adverse scenarios. In certain limited circumstances the Company may use the
credit derivatives market to exchange credit risk for fixed rate payments if it
believes this approach is more efficient than entering into a cash-based
security transaction. In addition, the Company periodically examines, on various
levels of aggregation, its actual default loss experience on significant asset
classes to determine if the losses are consistent with the (1) levels assumed in
product pricing, (2) ACLI loss experience and (3) rating agencies'
quality-specific cohort default data. These tests have generally found the
Company's aggregate experience to be favorable relative to these external
benchmarks and consistent with priced-for-levels.
The Company evaluates fixed income securities on a case by case basis for
issues of collectibility. The bond analysts operate in an industry-based,
team-oriented structure that facilitates the evaluation of the Company's entire
fixed income holdings quarterly and formal presentations to management twice
annually. In addition, trading levels of publicly traded securities and other
market factors and industry trends are followed and their impact on individual
credits are assessed as they occur. Indenture covenants which provide the
Company additional protection in the
23
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
event of credit deterioration are also monitored continuously. When as a result
of any of these analyses, management believes that the collectibility of any
amounts owed is other than temporarily impaired, the underlying asset is written
down to fair value.
As of December 31, 2001, the Company's fixed maturity portfolio was
comprised of 87.7% investment grade securities and 12.3% below-investment-grade
securities. These percentages are consistent with recent experience and
indicative of the Company's long-standing investment philosophy of pursuing
moderate amounts of credit risk in anticipation of earning higher expected
returns. We believe that credit risk can be successfully managed given our
proprietary credit evaluation models and experienced personnel. For additional
information regarding the credit quality of the Company's portfolio, see Note 3
to our consolidated financial statements and Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Segment Operations.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company maintains a tightly controlled approach to managing its
potential interest rate risk. Interest rate risk arises from many of our primary
activities, as we invest substantial funds in interest-sensitive assets to
support the issuance of our various interest-sensitive liabilities .
We manage interest rate sensitive segments of our business, and their
supporting investments, under one of two broadly defined risk management methods
designed to provide an appropriate matching of assets and liabilities. For
guaranteed rate products, where contractual liability cash flows are highly
predictable we apply sophisticated duration-matching techniques to manage the
segment's exposure to both parallel and non-parallel yield curve movements.
Typically this approach involves a duration mismatch tolerance of less than +/-
.05 years, with other techniques used for limiting exposure to non-parallel
risk. Duration measures the sensitivity of the fair value of assets and
liabilities to changes in interest rates. For example, should interest rates
increase by 100 basis points, the fair value of an asset with a 5-year duration
is expected to decrease in value by approximately 5.0%. For non-guaranteed rate
products we apply scenario-modeling techniques to develop investment policies
with what we believe to be the optimal risk/return tradeoff given our risk
constraints. Each scenario is based on near term reasonably possible
hypothetical changes in interest rates that illustrate the potential impact of
such events.
We project asset and liability cash flows on guaranteed rate products and
then discount them against credit-specific interest rate curves to attain fair
values. Duration is then calculated by re-pricing these cash flows against a
modified or "shocked" interest rate curve and evaluating the change in fair
value versus the base case. As of December 31, 2001, the fair value of fixed
maturity securities and mortgage loans supporting duration-managed liabilities
was approximately $1,226.1 million.
The risk management method for non-guaranteed rate products, such as whole
life insurance is less formulaic, but more complex, due to the less predictable
nature of the liability cash flows. For these products, we manage interest rate
risk based on scenario-based portfolio modeling that seeks to identify the most
appropriate investment strategy given probable policyholder behavior and
liability crediting needs under a wide range of interest rate environments. As
of December 31, 2001, the fair value of fixed maturity securities and mortgage
loans supporting liabilities managed under this modeling was approximately
$1,587.2 million.
Derivative Instruments
The Company uses a variety of derivative financial instruments, including
swaps, caps, floors, and exchange traded futures contracts, in accordance with
Company investment policy. Permissible derivative applications include the
reduction of economic risk (i.e., hedging) related to changes in yields, prices,
cash flows, and currency exchange rates. In addition, certain limited
applications of "income generation" are allowed. Examples of this type of use
include the purchase of call options to offset the sale of embedded options in
Company liability issuance or the purchase of swaptions to offset the purchase
of embedded put options in certain investments. The Company does not make a
market or trade derivatives for speculative purposes.
As of January 1, 2001, Financial Accounting Standard No. 133 ("Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities") became effective for all
companies reporting under accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States (GAAP). Briefly stated, SFAS No. 133 requires that all derivative
instruments must be recorded as either assets or liabilities on the Company's
balance sheet, with quarterly recognition thereafter of changes in derivative
fair values through its income statement. The income effect of derivatives that
meet all requirements of a
24
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
"qualified hedge" under SFAS No. 133 guidance may be offset, in part or in its
entirety, by recognition of changes in fair value on specifically identified
underlying hedged-items. These hedged-items must be identified at the inception
of the hedge and may consist of assets, liabilities, firm commitments or
forecasted transactions. Depending upon the designated form of the hedge (i.e.,
fair value or cash flow), changes in fair value must either be recorded
immediately through income or through shareholders' equity ("Other Comprehensive
Income) for subsequent amortization into income.
In preparing for the implementation of SFAS No. 133, the Company invested
significant time and resources to achieve two primary objectives. First,
preserving the ability to hedge economic risks inherent in its business
operations, with assurance that such hedges were structured in a SFAS No. 133
compliant fashion. Second, the reduction of income volatility arising from
"ineffective" or less than perfect hedges, whereby income from hedged-item fair
value recognition only partially offsets income from derivatives fair value
recognition. In the course of achieving these objectives the Company undertook
an extensive examination of its derivatives hedging program. The examination
identified one area where the Company's risk management applications required
adjustment to accommodate the mandates of SFAS No. 133. Each of these hedging
applications was modified so as to retain its economic effectiveness and achieve
compliance with SFAS No. 133. In addition, the examination proved beneficial in
several other ways, including the implementation and customization of a vendor
derivatives valuation and accounting software, improved front and back office
derivatives capabilities, refinement of responsibilities to ensure appropriate
separation of duties, and enhanced derivatives compliance procedures.
The Parent's Investment Compliance Unit monitors all derivatives activity
for consistency with internal policies and guidelines. All derivatives trading
activity is reported monthly to the Parent Company's Committee of Finance for
review, with a comprehensive governance report provided jointly each quarter by
the Parent's Derivatives Supervisory Officer and Chief Investment Compliance
Officer. The table below reflects the Company's derivative positions hedging
interest rate risk as of December 31, 2001. The notional amounts in the table
represent the basis on which pay or receive amounts are calculated and are not
reflective of credit risk. These fair value exposures represent only a point in
time and will be subject to change as a result of ongoing portfolio and risk
management activities.
As of December 31, 2001
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair Value
----------------------------------------------
Weighted-
Notional Average Term -100 Basis As of +100 Basis
Amount (Years) Point Change 12/31/01 Point Change
------------- ----------------- ---------------- ----------- -----------------
(in millions, except for Weighted-Average Term)
Interest rate swaps............ $ 1,341.8 3.9 $ (24.0) $ (4.2) $ 14.0
Futures contracts (1) ......... 33.8 8.1 (1.4) (0.2) 1.0
Interest rate floors........... 239.4 5.8 1.8 3.5 6.4
Interest rate caps............. 361.4 8.4 1.9 1.2 0.2
------------- ----------------------------------------------
Totals.................... $ 1,976.4 5.0 $ (21.7) $ 0.3 $ 21.6
============= ==============================================
(1) Represents the notional value on open contracts as of December 31, 2001.
(2) The selection of a 100 basis point immediate change in interest rates
should not be construed as a prediction by us of future market events but
rather as an illustration of the potential impact of such an event.
Our non-exchange-traded derivatives are exposed to the possibility of loss
from a counterparty failing to perform its obligations under terms of the
derivative contract. We believe the risk of incurring losses due to
nonperformance by our counterparties is remote. To manage this risk, Company
procedures include the (a) on-going evaluation of each counterparty's credit
ratings, (b) the application of credit limits and monitoring procedures based on
an internally developed, scenario-based risk assessment system, (c) quarterly
reporting of each counterparty's "potential exposure", (d) master netting
agreements, and (e) the use of collateral agreements. Futures contracts trade on
organized exchanges and have effectively no credit risk.
As of December 31, 2001, the Company had no outstanding fixed income
obligations.
25
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Equity Risk
Equity risk is the possibility that we will incur economic losses due to
adverse changes in a particular common stock or warrant. In order to reduce our
exposure to market fluctuations on some of our common stock portfolio, we use
equity collar agreements. These equity collar agreements limit the market value
fluctuations on their underlying equity securities. Our equity collars are
comprised of an equal number of purchased put options and written call options,
each with strike rates equidistant from the stock price at the time the contract
is established. As of December 31, 2001, the fair value of our equity securities
portfolio was approximately $13.1 million. The fair value of our equity collar
agreements as of December 31, 2001 was $0.8 million. A hypothetical 15% decline
in the December 31, 2001 value of the equity securities hedged with equity
collar agreements would result in an unrealized loss of approximately $(0.2)
million. The selection of a 15% immediate change in the value of equity
securities should not be construed as a prediction by us of future market events
but rather as an illustration of the potential impact of such an event. The fair
value of any unhedged common stock holdings will rise or fall with equity market
and company-specific trends.
Foreign Currency Risk
Foreign currency risk is the possibility that we will incur economic
losses due to adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We also own
fixed maturity securities that are denominated in foreign currencies. We use
derivatives to hedge the foreign currency risk of these securities (both
interest and principal payments). At December 31, 2001, the fair value of our
foreign currency denominated fixed maturity securities was approximately $25.6
million. The fair value of our currency swap agreements at December 31, 2001
supporting foreign denominated bonds was $0.1 million.
We estimate that as of December 31, 2001, a 10% immediate change in each
of the foreign currency exchange rates to which we are exposed, including the
currency swap agreements, would result in no material change to the net fair
value of our foreign currency-denominated instruments identified above. The
selection of a 10% immediate change in all currency exchange rates should not be
construed as a prediction by us of future market events but rather as an
illustration of the potential impact of such an event. Our largest individual
currency exposure is to the Canadian dollar.
The modeling technique we use to calculate our exposure does not take into
account correlation among foreign currency exchange rates or correlation among
various markets. Our actual experience may differ from the results noted above
due to the correlation assumptions utilized or if events occur that were not
included in the methodology, such as significant illiquidity or other market
events.
Effects of Inflation
The Company does not believe that inflation has had a material effect on
the results of its operations except insofar as inflation may affect interest
rates.
26
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors
John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of John Hancock
Variable Life Insurance Company as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholder's equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2001. Our audits also included the financial statement
schedules listed in the Index at Item 14(a). These financial statements and
schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of John Hancock
Variable Life Insurance Company at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the
related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2001 the
Company changed its method of accounting for derivatives.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 21, 2002
27
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2001 2000
-------------------------
(in millions)
Assets
Investments - Notes 3 and 4
Fixed maturities:
Held-to-maturity - at amortized cost
(fair value: 2001 - $82.1; 2000 - $686.8) $ 83.7 $ 715.4
Available-for-sale--at fair value
(cost: 2001 - $2,391.9; 2000 - $1,018.8) 2,412.5 1,011.8
Equity securities:
Available-for-sale--at fair value
(cost: 2001 - $12.1; 2000 - $7.1) ....... 13.1 8.1
Mortgage loans on real estate ................... 580.9 554.8
Real estate ..................................... 20.6 23.9
Policy loans .................................... 352.0 334.2
Short-term investments .......................... -- 21.7
Other invested assets ........................... 39.6 34.8
------------------------
Total Investments .......................... 3,502.4 2,704.7
Cash and cash equivalents ....................... 115.4 277.3
Accrued investment income ....................... 60.8 52.1
Premiums and accounts receivable ................ 12.5 7.0
Deferred policy acquisition costs ............... 1,060.8 994.1
Reinsurance recoverable - Note 6 ................ 110.4 48.4
Other assets .................................... 121.8 28.2
Separate accounts assets ........................ 6,729.1 8,082.9
------------------------
Total Assets ............................... $11,713.2 $12,194.7
========================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
28
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - (CONTINUED)
December 31
2001 2000
-----------------------------
(in millions)
Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity
Liabilities
Future policy benefits............................................... $ 3,335.4 $ 2,754.2
Policyholders' funds................................................. 3.0 14.2
Unearned revenue..................................................... 221.0 212.0
Unpaid claims and claim expense reserves............................. 25.0 11.1
Dividends payable to policyholders................................... 0.3 0.1
Income taxes - Note 5................................................ 191.1 64.2
Other liabilities.................................................... 242.7 250.4
Separate accounts liabilities........................................ 6,729.1 8,082.9
-----------------------------
Total Liabilities............................................... 10,747.6 11,389.1
Shareholder's Equity - Note 8
Common stock, $50 par value; 50,000 shares authorized;
50,000 shares issued and outstanding............................ 2.5 2.5
Additional paid in capital........................................... 572.4 572.4
Retained earnings.................................................... 377.8 232.9
Accumulated other comprehensive loss................................. 12.9 (2.2)
-----------------------------
Total Shareholder's Equity...................................... 965.6 805.6
-----------------------------
Total Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity...................... $11,713.2 $12,194.7
=============================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
29
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Year Ended December 31
2001 2000 1999
----------------------------------------
(in millions)
Revenues
Premiums ........................................................ $ 60.1 $ 28.6 $ 8.9
Universal life and investment-type product charges .............. 365.4 337.1 341.5
Net investment income - Note 3 .................................. 227.0 213.4 174.6
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of related
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs of $(1.5),
$(3.8) and $(0.5), respectively - Notes 1, 3, and 9 ......... (9.0) (10.6) (4.8)
Other revenues .................................................. 24.0 0.2 0.2
----------------------------------------
Total revenues .................................................. 667.5 568.7 520.4
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders ....................................... 294.1 248.6 260.5
Other operating costs and expenses .............................. 76.2 116.8 117.5
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, excluding
amounts related to net realized investment and other
gains (losses) of $(1.5), $(3.8) and $(0.5), respectively
- Notes 1, 3 and 9 ......................................... 67.1 34.0 13.1
Dividends to policyholders ...................................... 21.4 26.1 25.7
----------------------------------------
Total benefits and expenses ..................................... 458.8 425.5 416.8
----------------------------------------
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change ........................................... 208.7 143.2 103.6
Income taxes - Note 5 ........................................... 62.2 43.8 35.2
----------------------------------------
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change ............ 146.5 99.4 68.4
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax .............. (1.6) -- --
----------------------------------------
Net income ...................................................... $144.9 $ 99.4 $ 68.4
========================================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
30
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Accumulated
Other Total Outstanding
Common Additional Retained Comprehensive Shareholder's Shares
Stock Paid In Capital Earnings Income Equity (in thousands)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Balance at January 1, 1999....... $2.5 $377.5 $ 65.1 $12.3 $457.4 50.0
Comprehensive income:
Net income....................... 68.4 68.4
Other comprehensive income,
net of tax:
Net unrealized losses....... (25.7) (25.7)
---------------
Comprehensive income............. 42.7
Capital contribution............. 194.9 194.9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 1999..... $2.5 $572.4 $133.5 ($13.4) $695.0 50.0
Comprehensive income:
Net income....................... 99.4 99.4
Other comprehensive income,
net of tax:
Net unrealized gains........ 11.2 11.2
---------------
Comprehensive income............. 110.6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 2000..... $2.5 $572.4 $232.9 ($2.2) $805.6 50.0
Comprehensive income:
Net income.................. 144.9 144.9
Other comprehensive income,
net of tax:
Net unrealized gains........ 7.9 7.9
---------------
Comprehensive income............. 152.8
Change in accounting principle... 7.2 7.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 2001..... $2.5 $572.4 $377.8 $12.9 $965.6 50.0
======================================================================================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
31
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31
2001 2000 1999
------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income................................................. $ 144.9 $ 99.4 $ 68.4
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided (used) by operating activities:
Amortization of discount - fixed maturities.... (0.4) (1.9) 1.2
Realized investment losses, net................ 9.0 10.6 4.8
Change in deferred policy acquisition costs.... (74.1) (141.5) (126.5)
Depreciation and amortization ................. 0.3 1.9 0.6
Increase in accrued investment income.......... (8.6) (10.2) (3.5)
Decrease (increase) in premiums and accounts
receivable................................. (5.5) 0.3 (2.4)
(Increase) decrease in other assets and other
liabilities, net........................... (159.2) 70.7 (58.2)
Increase (decrease) in policy liabilities and
accruals, net.............................. 289.1 (401.1) (377.6)
Increase in income taxes ...................... 118.7 22.5 33.8
------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided (used) by operating
activities................................. 314.2 (349.3) (459.4)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Sales of:
Fixed maturities available-for-sale...................... 184.6 194.6 204.3
Equity securities available-for-sale..................... 6.0 1.0 0.6
Real estate.............................................. 3.3 0.2 17.9
Short-term investments and other invested assets......... -- 1.3 1.5
Maturities, prepayments and scheduled redemptions of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity........................ 4.5 79.9 75.8
Fixed maturities available-for-sale...................... 180.4 91.5 53.6
Short-term investments and other invested assets......... 46.5 10.1 --
Mortgage loans on real estate............................ 66.4 85.6 35.8
Purchases of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity........................ (5.1) (127.2) (98.8)
Fixed maturities available-for-sale...................... (1,112.3) (424.7) (250.9)
Equity securities available-for-sale..................... (6.1) (0.6) (4.0)
Real estate.............................................. (0.6) (0.4) (2.2)
Short-term investments and other invested assets......... (39.6) (38.8) (14.6)
Mortgage loans on real estate issued..................... (85.0) (100.5) (90.3)
Other, net............................................... (25.6) (41.5) (30.6)
------------------------------------------------------
Net cash used in investing activities................ (782.6) (269.5) (101.9)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
32
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - (CONTINUED)
Year Ended December 31
2001 2000 1999
------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Capital contribution from parent company................. -- -- $ 194.9
Universal life and investment-type contract deposits..... $1,220.7 $1,067.2 1,026.3
Universal life and investment-type contract maturities
and withdrawals ..................................... (914.2) (430.7) (380.7)
Repayment of long term debt............................. -- -- (61.9)
------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by financing activities................ 306.5 636.5 778.6
------------------------------------------------------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents..... (161.9) 17.7 217.3
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year................ 277.3 259.6 42.3
------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year...................... $ 115.4 $ 277.3 $ 259.6
======================================================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
33
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business
John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company (the Company) is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of John Hancock Life Insurance Company (John Hancock or the Parent).
The Company, domiciled in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, issues variable and
universal life insurance policies, individual whole and term life policies and
fixed and variable annuity contracts. Those policies primarily are marketed
through John Hancock's sales organization, which includes a career agency system
composed of Company-supported independent general agencies and a direct
brokerage system that markets directly to external independent brokers. Policies
are also sold through various unaffiliated securities broker-dealers and certain
other financial institutions. Currently, the Company writes business in all
states except New York.
Basis of Presentation
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Investors Partner Life Insurance
Company (IPL). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated.
Partnerships, joint venture interests and other equity investments in which the
Company does not have a controlling interest, but has significant influence, are
recorded using the equity method of accounting and included in other invested
assets.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation.
Reorganization and Initial Public Offering
Pursuant to a Plan of Reorganization approved by the policyholders and the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Insurance, effective February 1, 2000,
John Hancock converted from a mutual life insurance company to a stock life
insurance company (i.e., demutualized) and became a wholly owned subsidiary of
John Hancock Financial Services, Inc., which is a holding company. In connection
with the reorganization, John Hancock changed its name to John Hancock Life
Insurance Company. In addition, on February 1, 2000, John Hancock Financial
Services, Inc. completed its initial public offering and 102.0 million shares of
common stock were issued at an initial public offering price of $17 per share.
Investments
The Company classifies its debt and equity investment securities into one of
three categories: held-to-maturity, available-for-sale or trading. The Company
determines the appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of
purchase and re-evaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date. Fixed
maturity investments include bonds, mortgage-backed securities, and redeemable
preferred stock and are classified as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale.
Those bonds and mortgage-backed securities that the Company has the positive
intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and
carried at amortized cost. Fixed maturity investments not classified as
held-to-maturity are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair
value. Unrealized gains and losses related to available-for-sale securities are
reflected in shareholder's equity, net of related amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs and applicable taxes. The amortized cost of debt
securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts
to maturity. Such amortization is included in investment income. The amortized
cost of fixed maturity investments is adjusted for impairments in value deemed
to be other than temporary, and such adjustments are reported as a component of
net realized investment and other gains (losses).
For the mortgage-backed bond portion of the fixed maturity investment portfolio,
the Company recognizes income using a constant effective yield based on
anticipated prepayments and the estimated economic life of the securities. When
actual prepayments differ significantly from anticipated prepayments, the
effective yield is recalculated to reflect actual payments to date plus
anticipated future payments, and any resulting adjustment is included in net
investment income.
34
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
Equity securities include common stock and non-redeemable preferred stock.
Equity securities that have readily determinable fair values are carried at fair
value. For equity securities which the Company has classified as
available-for-sale, unrealized gains and losses are reflected in shareholder's
equity, as described above for fixed maturity securities. Impairments in value
deemed to be other than temporary are reported as a component of net realized
investment and other gains (losses).
Mortgage loans on real estate are carried at unpaid principal balances adjusted
for amortization of premium or discount, less allowance for probable losses.
When it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts of
principal and interest due according to the contractual terms of the mortgage
loan agreement, the loan is deemed to be impaired and a valuation allowance for
probable losses is established. The valuation allowance is based on the present
value of the expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan's original
effective interest rate or on the collateral value of the loan if the loan is
collateral dependent. Any change to the valuation allowance for mortgage loans
on real estate is reported as a component of net realized investment and other
gains (losses). Interest received on impaired mortgage loans on real estate is
included in interest income in the period received. If foreclosure becomes
probable, the measurement method used is collateral value. Foreclosed real
estate is then recorded at the collateral's fair value at the date of
foreclosure, which establishes a new cost basis.
Investment real estate, which the Company has the intent to hold for the
production of income, is carried at depreciated cost, using the straight-line
method of depreciation, less adjustments for impairments in value. In those
cases where it is determined that the carrying amount of investment real estate
is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recognized based on the difference
between the depreciated cost and fair value of the asset. The Company reports
impairment losses as part of net realized investment and other gains (losses).
Real estate to be disposed of is carried at the lower of cost or fair value less
costs to sell. Any changes to the valuation allowance for real estate to be
disposed of is reported as a component of net realized investment and other
gains (losses). The Company does not depreciate real estate to be disposed of.
Policy loans are carried at unpaid principal balances, which approximate fair
value.
Short-term investments are carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair
value.
Net realized investment and other gains (losses), other than those related to
separate accounts for which the Company does not bear the investment risk, are
determined on the basis of specific identification and are reported net of
related amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses various derivative instruments to hedge and manage its exposure
to changes in interest rate levels, foreign exchange rates, and equity market
prices, and to manage the duration of assets and liabilities. All derivatives
instruments are carried on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value.
In certain cases, the Company uses hedge accounting as allowed by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities," by designating derivative instruments as
either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges. For derivative instruments that
are designated and qualify as fair value hedges, the change in fair value of the
derivative instrument as well as the offsetting change in fair value of the
hedged item are recorded in net realized investment and other gains (losses).
Basis adjustments are amortized into income through net realized investment and
other gains (losses). For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify
as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the
derivative instrument is recorded in other comprehensive income, and then
reclassified into income when the hedged item affects income. Hedge
effectiveness is assessed quarterly by a variety of techniques including
regression analysis and cumulative dollar offset. In certain cases, there is no
hedge ineffectiveness because the derivative instrument was constructed such
that all the terms of the derivative exactly match the hedged risk in the hedged
item. If a hedge becomes ineffective, the hedge accounting described above
ceases.
35
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
In cases where the Company receives or pays a premium as consideration for
entering into a derivative instrument (i.e., interest rate caps and floors,
swaptions, and equity collars), the premium is amortized into investment income
over the useful life of the derivative instrument. The fair value of such
premiums (i.e., the inherent ineffectiveness of the derivative) is excluded from
the assessment of hedge effectiveness and is included in net realized investment
and other gains (losses). Changes in fair value of derivatives that are not
hedges are included in net realized investment and other gains (losses).
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and all highly liquid debt investments
with a maturity of three months or less when purchased.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Costs that vary with, and are related primarily to, the production of new
business have been deferred to the extent that they are deemed recoverable. Such
costs include commissions, certain costs of policy issue and underwriting, and
certain agency expenses. For participating traditional life insurance policies,
such costs are being amortized over the life of the contracts at a constant rate
based on the present value of the estimated gross margin amounts expected to be
realized over the lives of the contracts. Estimated gross margin amounts include
anticipated premiums and investment results less claims and administrative
expenses, changes in the net level premium reserve and expected annual
policyholder dividends. For universal life insurance contracts and
investment-type products, such costs are being amortized generally in proportion
to the present value of expected gross profits arising principally from
surrender charges and investment results, and mortality and expense margins. The
effects on the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs of revisions to
estimated gross margins and profits are reflected in earnings in the period such
estimated gross margins and profits are revised. For non-participating term life
insurance products, such costs are being amortized over the premium-paying
period of the related policies using assumptions consistent with those used in
computing policy benefit reserves. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs was $68.6 million, $37.8 million and $13.6 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999,
respectively.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs is allocated to: (1) net
realized investment and other gains (losses) for those products in which such
gains (losses) have a direct impact on the amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs; (2) unrealized investment gains and losses, net of tax, to
provide for the effect on the deferred policy acquisition cost asset that would
result from the realization of unrealized gains and losses on assets backing
participating traditional life insurance and universal life and investment-type
contracts; and (3) a separate component of benefits and expenses to reflect
amortization related to the gross margins or profits, excluding realized gains
and losses, relating to policies and contracts in force.
Net realized investment and other gains (losses) related to certain products
have a direct impact on the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs as
such gains and losses affect the amount and timing of profit emergence.
Accordingly, to the extent that such amortization results from net realized
investment and other gains and (losses), management believes that presenting
realized investment gains and losses net of related amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs provides information useful in evaluating the operating
performance of the Company. This presentation may not be comparable to
presentations made by other insurers.
Reinsurance
The Company utilizes reinsurance agreements to provide for greater
diversification of business, allowing management to control exposure to
potential losses arising from large risks and provide additional capacity for
growth.
Assets and liabilities related to reinsurance ceded contracts are reported on a
gross basis. The accompanying statements of income reflect premiums, benefits
and settlement expenses net of reinsurance ceded. Reinsurance premiums,
commissions, expense reimbursements, benefits and reserves related to reinsured
business are accounted for on bases consistent with those used in accounting for
the original policies issued and the terms of the reinsurance contracts. The
Company remains liable to its policyholders to the extent that counterparties to
reinsurance ceded contracts do not meet their contractual obligations.
36
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
Separate Accounts
Separate account assets and liabilities reported in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets represent funds that are administered and invested
by the Company to meet specific investment objectives of the contractholders.
Net investment income and net realized investment and other gains (losses)
generally accrue directly to such contractholders who bear the investment risk,
subject in some cases to minimum guaranteed rates. The assets of each separate
account are legally segregated and are not subject to claims that arise out of
any other business of the Company. Separate account assets are reported at fair
value. Deposits, net investment income and net realized investment and other
gains (losses) of separate accounts are not included in the revenues of the
Company. Fees charged to contractholders, principally mortality, policy
administration and surrender charges, are included in universal life and
investment-type product charges.
Future Policy Benefits and Policyholders' Funds
Future policy benefits for participating traditional life insurance policies are
based on the net level premium method. This net level premium reserve is
calculated using the guaranteed mortality and dividend fund interest rates,
which range from 4.5% to 5.0%. The liability for annual dividends represents the
accrual of annual dividends earned. Settlement dividends are accrued in
proportion to gross margins over the life of the contract.
For non-participating traditional life insurance policies, future policy
benefits are estimated using a net level premium method on the basis of
actuarial assumptions as to mortality, persistency, interest and expenses
established at policy issue. Assumptions established at policy issue as to
mortality and persistency are based on the Company's experience, which, together
with interest and expense assumptions, include a margin for adverse deviation.
Benefit liabilities for annuities during the accumulation period are equal to
accumulated contractholders' fund balances and after annuitization are equal to
the present value of expected future payments. Interest rates used in
establishing such liabilities range from 7.5% to 8.0% for life insurance
liabilities, and from 3.5% to 10.3% for individual annuity liabilities.
Policyholders' funds for universal life and investment-type products are equal
to the policyholder account values before surrender charges. Policy benefits
that are charged to expense include benefit claims incurred in the period in
excess of related policy account balances and interest credited to
policyholders' account balances. Interest crediting rates range from 3.0% to
9.0% for universal life products.
Liabilities for unpaid claims and claim expenses include estimates of payments
to be made on reported individual life claims and estimates of incurred but not
reported claims based on historical claims development patterns.
Estimates of future policy benefit reserves, claim reserves and expenses are
reviewed continually and adjusted as necessary; such adjustments are reflected
in current earnings. Although considerable variability is inherent in such
estimates, management believes that future policy benefit reserves and unpaid
claims and claims expense reserves are adequate.
Participating Insurance
Participating business represents approximately 7.6% and 16.3% of the Company's
life insurance in-force at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
The amount of policyholders' dividends to be paid is approved annually by the
Company's Board of Directors. The determination of the amount of policyholder
dividends is complex and varies by policy type. In general, the aggregate amount
of policyholders' dividends is related to actual interest, mortality, morbidity,
persistency and expense experience for the year and is also based on
management's judgment as to the appropriate level of statutory surplus to be
retained by the Company.
Revenue Recognition
Premiums from participating and non-participating traditional life insurance and
annuity policies with life contingencies are recognized as income when due.
37
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
Premiums from universal life and investment-type contracts are reported as
deposits to policyholders' account balances. Revenues from these contracts
consist of amounts assessed during the period against policyholders' account
balances for mortality charges, policy administration charges and surrender
charges.
Premiums for contracts with a single premium or a limited number of premium
payments, due over a significantly shorter period than the total period over
which benefits are provided, are recorded in income when due. The portion of
such premium that is not required to provide for all benefits and expenses is
deferred and recognized in income in a constant relationship to insurance in
force or, for annuities, the amount of expected future benefit payments.
Federal Income Taxes
The provision for federal income taxes includes amounts currently payable or
recoverable and deferred income taxes, computed under the liability method,
resulting from temporary differences between the tax basis and book basis of
assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax
assets when it is more likely than not that an amount will not be realized.
Foreign Currency Translation
Gains or losses on foreign currency transactions are reflected in earnings.
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Changes
On January 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133, as amended by SFAS No.
138, "Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging
Activities". The adoption of SFAS No. 133, as amended, resulted in a charge to
operations accounted for as a cumulative effect of accounting change of $1.6
million (net of tax of $0.4 million) as of January 1, 2001. In addition, as of
January 1, 2001, a $7.2 million (net of tax of $3.9 million) cumulative effect
of accounting change was recorded in other comprehensive income including (1)
the transition adjustment in the adoption of SFAS 133, as amended, an increase
of $0.8 million (net of tax of $0.4 million), and (2) the reclassification of
$603.1 million in securities from the held-to-maturity category to the
available-for-sale category, an increase of $6.4 million (net of tax of $3.4
million).
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2001, the FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on
Issue 01-10, "Accounting for the Impact of the Terrorist Attacks of September
11, 2001." Issue 01-10 presents guidance relative to accounting for and
financial reporting of the events of September 11, 2001 (the Events), including
both how and when to measure, record and report losses and any resulting
liabilities which are directly attributable to the Events. Based on a
comprehensive review of the Company's operations, the Company believes that the
Events had no material financial impact on the Company's results of operations
or financial position.
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations." SFAS No.
141 requires that all business combinations be accounted for under a single
method, the purchase method. Use of the pooling-of-interests method is no longer
permitted. SFAS No. 141 also clarifies the criteria to recognize intangible
assets separately from goodwill, and prohibits the amortization of goodwill
relating to acquisitions completed after July 1, 2001. SFAS No. 141 is effective
for business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001.The adoption of SFAS No.
141 did not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations or
financial position.
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets." SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and other intangible assets deemed
to have indefinite lives no longer be amortized to earnings, but instead be
reviewed at least annually for impairment. Intangible assets with definite lives
will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. SFAS No. 142 will be
effective January 1, 2002. The Company has no goodwill, or other purchased
intangibles subject to SFAS No. 142 and, therefore, the Company does not expect
the impact of SFAS No. 142 to have any impact on its results of operations or
financial position.
In January, 2001, the FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a
consensus on Issue No. 99-20, "Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on
Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets".
Issue 99-20 requires investors in certain asset-backed securities to record
changes in their
38
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
estimated yield on a prospective basis and specifies evaluation methods with
which to evaluate these securities for an other-than-temporary decline in value.
The adoption of EITF 99-20 did not have a material financial impact on the
Company's results of operations or financial position.
In September 2000, the FASB issued SFAS No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities," which
replaces SFAS No. 125, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities." SFAS No. 140 provides new accounting
and reporting standards which are based on consistent application of a financial
components approach that focuses on control. Under this approach, after a
transfer of financial assets, the Company recognizes the financial and servicing
assets it controls and the liabilities it has incurred, derecognizes financial
assets when control has been surrendered, and derecognizes liabilities when
extinguished. SFAS No. 140 provides consistent standards for distinguishing
transfers of financial assets that are sales from transfers that are secured
borrowings. SFAS No. 140 is effective for transfers and servicing of financial
assets and extinguishments of liabilities occurring after March 31, 2001. The
adoption of SFAS No. 140 did not have a material impact on the Company's results
of operations or financial position.
In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin 101 (SAB 101), "Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements." SAB 101 clarifies the SEC staff's views on applying generally
accepted accounting principles to revenue recognition in financial statements.
In March 2000, the SEC issued an amendment, SAB 101A, which deferred the
effective date of SAB 101. In June 2000, the SEC issued a second amendment, SAB
101B, which deferred the effective date of SAB 101 to no later than the fourth
fiscal quarter of fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1999. The Company
adopted SAB 101 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2000. The adoption of SAB 101
did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or
financial position.
Codification
In March 1998, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
adopted codified statutory accounting principles (Codification) effective
January 1, 2001. Codification changes prescribed statutory accounting practices
and resulted in changes to the accounting practices that the Company and its
domestic life insurance subsidiary uses to prepare their statutory-basis
financial statements. The states of domicile of the Company and its domestic
life insurance subsidiary have adopted Codification as the prescribed basis of
accounting on which domestic insurers must report their statutory-basis results
effective January 1, 2001. The cumulative effect of changes in accounting
principles adopted to conform to the requirements of Codification is reported as
an adjustment to surplus in the statutory-basis financial statements as of
January 1, 2001. The implementation of Codification increased the Company's
statutory-basis capital and surplus and, the Company remains in compliance with
all regulatory and contractual obligations.
39
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 2 - Related Party Transactions
John Hancock provides the Company with personnel, property, and facilities
in carrying out certain of its corporate functions. John Hancock annually
determines a fee (the parent company service fee) for these services and
facilities based on a number of criteria, which are periodically revised to
reflect continuing changes in the Company's operations. The parent company
service fee is included in deferred acquisition costs on the Company's balance
sheets, net investment income and other operating costs and expenses within the
Company's income statements. John Hancock charged the Company a service fee of
$159.9 million, $170.6 million and $199.3 million for the year ended December
31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. As of December 31, 2001 and 2000,
respectively, the Company owed John Hancock $17.9 million and $56.9 million
related to these services, which is included in other liabilities. John Hancock
has guaranteed that, if necessary, it will make additional capital contributions
to prevent the Company's shareholder's equity from declining below $1.0 million.
In 2001 the Company sold $200 million of corporate owned life insurance
(COLI) to it Parent to provide insurance coverage on key management employees of
the Parent. The death benefit on this COLI product would cover the cost of
replacing these employees, including recruiting, training, and development.
The Company has a modified coinsurance agreement with John Hancock to
reinsure 50% of 1994 through 2001 issues of flexible premium variable life
insurance and scheduled premium variable life insurance policies. In connection
with this agreement, John Hancock transferred to the Company $11.8 million,
$24.2 million, and $44.5 million of cash for tax, commission, and expense
allowances. This agreement decreased the Company's net gain from operations by
$1.7 million and $0.9 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively, and increased the
Company's net gain from operations by $20.6 million in 1999.
The Company has a modified coinsurance agreement with John Hancock to
reinsure 50% of the Company's 1995 in-force block and 50% of 1996 and all future
issue years of certain retail annuity contracts. In connection with this
agreement, the Company is holding a deposit liability of $107.5 million and
$102.2 million as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. This agreement
had no impact on the Company's net gain from operations.
Effective January 1, 1997, the Company entered into a stop-loss agreement
with John Hancock to reinsure mortality claims in excess of 100% of expected
mortality claims for all policies that are not reinsured under any other
indemnity agreement. In connection with the agreement, John Hancock received
$0.4 million, $1.0 million, and $0.8 million from the Company in 2001, 2000 and
1999, respectively. This agreement decreased the Company's net gain from
operations by $0.8 million, $1.1 million, and $0.5 million in 2001, 2000, and
1999, respectively.
At December 31, 2001, the Company had a $250.0 million line of credit with
an affiliate, John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. At December 31, 2000, the
Company had a $250.0 million line of credit with affiliate, John Hancock Capital
Corp. At December 31, 2001 and 2000, the Company had no outstanding borrowings
under this agreement.
John Hancock allocates a portion of the expenses related to its employee
welfare plans to the Company. The amounts allocated to the Company were credits
of $10.4 million, $16.0 million and $17.5 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999,
respectively. The pension plan prepaid expense allocated to the Company amounted
to $64.3 million and $55.6 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively. Since 1988,
the Massachusetts Division of Insurance has provided the Company with approval
to recognize the pension plan prepaid expense, if any, in accordance with the
requirements of SFAS No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions."
40
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 3 - Investments
The following information summarizes the components of net investment
income and net realized investment and other gains (losses), net:
Year Ended December 31,
2001 2000 1999
------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Net Investment Income
Fixed maturities......................................... $ 160.1 $ 138.5 $ 127.1
Equity securities........................................ 0.3 0.2 --
Mortgage loans on real estate............................ 42.3 44.3 39.7
Real estate.............................................. 2.3 4.1 3.6
Policy loans............................................. 21.1 17.1 13.7
Short-term investments................................... 6.3 19.4 4.5
Other.................................................... 3.3 1.1 (2.0)
------------------------------------------------------
Gross investment income.................................. 235.7 224.7 186.6
Less investment expenses............................. 8.7 11.3 12.0
------------------------------------------------------
Net investment income........................... $ 227.0 $ 213.4 $ 174.6
======================================================
Net Realized Investment and other Gains (Losses), Net of
Related Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition
Costs
Fixed maturities......................................... $ (25.1) $ (16.0) $ (5.9)
Equity securities........................................ 3.8 0.8 --
Mortgage loans on real estate and real estate............ (1.2) (2.3) 0.9
Derivatives and other invested assets.................... 12.0 3.1 (0.3)
Amortization adjustment for deferred policy acquisition
costs.................................................. 1.5 3.8 0.5
------------------------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other losses, net of
related amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs................................................. $ (9.0) $ (10.6) $ (4.8)
======================================================
Gross gains of $6.5 million, $1.5 million, and $0.5 million and gross
losses of $3.3 million, $6.0 million, and $5.3 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999,
respectively, were realized on the sale of available-for-sale securities.
41
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 3 - Investments - (Continued)
The Company's investments in held-to-maturity securities and
available-for-sale securities are summarized below:
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
Cost Gains Losses Value
----------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
December 31, 2001
Held-to-Maturity:
Corporate securities.................... $ 65.0 $ -- $ 0.8 $ 64.2
Mortgage-backed securities.............. 18.7 0.2 1.0 17.9
----------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................ $ 83.7 $ 0.2 $ 1.8 $ 82.1
================================================================
Available-for-Sale:
Corporate securities.................... $1,867.5 $67.5 $44.2 $1,890.8
Mortgage-backed securities.............. 296.7 6.3 4.7 298.3
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions................ 0.9 -- -- 0.9
Debt securities issued by foreign
governments........................... 7.2 0.5 -- 7.7
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
corporations and agencies............. 219.6 1.1 5.9 214.8
----------------------------------------------------------------
Total fixed maturities.................. 2,391.9 75.4 54.8 2,412.5
Equity securities....................... 12.1 1.5 0.5 13.1
----------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................ $2,404.0 $76.9 $55.3 $2,425.6
================================================================
42
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 3 - Investments - (Continued)
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
Cost Gains Losses Value
----------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
December 31, 2000
Held-to-Maturity:
Corporate securities.................... $ 684.2 $23.4 $51.0 $ 656.6
Mortgage-backed securities.............. 29.3 0.2 1.2 28.3
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions................ 1.9 -- -- 1.9
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................ $ 715.4 $23.6 $52.2 $ 686.8
===============================================================
Available-for-Sale:
Corporate securities.................... $ 751.6 $20.6 $27.8 $ 744.4
Mortgage-backed securities.............. 239.1 3.6 3.7 239.0
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions................ 0.9 -- -- 0.9
Debt securities issued by foreign
governments........................... 11.1 0.3 0.6 10.8
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
corporations and agencies............. 16.1 0.7 0.1 16.7
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total fixed maturities.................. 1,018.8 25.2 32.2 1,011.8
Equity securities....................... 7.1 2.8 1.8 8.1
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................ $1,025.9 $28.0 $34.0 $1,019.9
===============================================================
43
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 3 - Investments - (Continued)
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturities at December 31,
2001, by contractual maturity, are shown below:
Amortized Fair
Cost Value
---------------------------------------
(in millions)
Held-to-Maturity:
Due in one year or less.......................... $ -- $ --
Due after one year through five years............ 3.0 3.0
Due after five years through ten years........... 8.6 8.6
Due after ten years.............................. 53.4 52.6
---------------------------------------
65.0 64.2
Mortgage-backed securities....................... 18.7 17.9
---------------------------------------
Total............................................ $ 83.7 $ 82.1
=======================================
Available-for-Sale:
Due in one year or less.......................... $ 97.5 $ 99.5
Due after one year through five years............ 772.0 794.2
Due after five years through ten years........... 935.2 929.4
Due after ten years.............................. 290.5 291.1
---------------------------------------
2,095.2 2,114.2
Mortgage-backed securities....................... 296.7 298.3
---------------------------------------
Total............................................ $ 2,391.9 $ 2,412.5
=======================================
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because eligible
borrowers may exercise their right to call or prepay obligations with or without
call or prepayment penalties.
The Company participates in a securities lending program for the purpose
of enhancing income on securities held. At December 31, 2001 and 2000, $300.0
million and $1.4 million, respectively, of the Company's bonds and stocks, at
market value, were on loan to various brokers/dealers, but were fully
collateralized by cash and U.S. government securities in an account held in
trust for the Company. The market value of the loaned securities is monitored on
a daily basis, and the Company obtains additional collateral when deemed
appropriate.
Mortgage loans on real estate are evaluated periodically as part of the
Company's loan review procedures and are considered impaired when, based on
current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable
to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. The allowance for losses is maintained at a level believed adequate
by management to absorb estimated probable credit losses that exist at the
balance sheet date. Management's periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the
allowance for losses is based on the Company's past loan loss experience, known
and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the
borrower's ability to repay (including the timing of future payments), the
estimated value of the underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio,
current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is
inherently subjective as it requires estimating the amounts and timing of future
cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to
significant change.
44
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 3 - Investments - (Continued)
Changes in the allowance for probable losses on mortgage loans on real
estate and real estate to be disposed of are summarized below.
Balance at Balance at
Beginning End of
of Year Additions Deductions Year
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Year ended December 31, 2001
Mortgage loans on real estate........ $ 5.0 $ 1.7 $ 1.2 $ 5.5
Real estate to be disposed of........ 0.7 0.1 -- 0.8
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 5.7 $ 1.8 $ 1.2 $ 6.3
=======================================================================
Year ended December 31, 2000
Mortgage loans on real estate........ $ 3.8 $ 1.2 $ -- $ 5.0
Real estate to be disposed of........ -- 0.7 -- 0.7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 3.8 $ 1.9 $ -- $ 5.7
=======================================================================
Year ended December 31, 1999
Mortgage loans on real estate........ $ 3.7 $ 0.4 $ 0.3 $ 3.8
Real estate to be disposed of........ 0.7 -- 0.7 --
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 4.4 $ 0.4 $ 1.0 $ 3.8
=======================================================================
At December 31, 2001 and 2000 the total recorded investment in mortgage loans
that are considered to be impaired under SFAS No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors
for Impairment of a Loan," along with the related provision for losses were as
follows:
December 31
2001 2000
----------------------------------
(in millions)
Impaired mortgage loans on real estate with provision for losses.... $ 2.4 $ 4.2
Provision for losses................................................ (1.2) (1.2)
----------------------------------
Net impaired mortgage loans on real estate.......................... $ 1.2 $ 3.0
==================================
The average investment in impaired loans and the interest income recognized
on impaired loans were as follows:
Year Ended December 31
2001 2000 1999
---------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Average recorded investment in impaired loans............... $ 3.3 $ 2.1 $ --
Interest income recognized on impaired loans................ 0.5 0.3 --
The payment terms of mortgage loans on real estate may be restructured or
modified from time to time. Generally, the terms of the restructured mortgage
loans call for the Company to receive some form or combination of an equity
participation in the underlying collateral, excess cash flows or an effective
yield at the maturity of the loans sufficient to meet the original terms of the
loans.
45
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 3 - Investments - (Continued)
There were no restructured commercial mortgage loans at December 31, 2001.
Such loans aggregated $3.4 million as of December 31, 2000. The expected gross
interest income that would have been recorded in 2000 had the loans been current
in accordance with the original loan agreements was $0.34 million, and the
actual interest income recorded was $0.27 million.
At December 31, 2001, the mortgage portfolio was diversified by geographic
region and specific collateral property type as displayed below:
Carrying Geographic Carrying
Property Type Amount Concentration Amount
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Apartments................. $115.1 East North Central............ $ 63.6
Hotels..................... 24.8 East South Central............ 25.8
Industrial................. 72.1 Middle Atlantic............... 50.6
Office buildings .......... 146.4 Mountain...................... 35.5
Retail..................... 35.5 New England................... 55.1
Mixed Use.................. 5.0 Pacific....................... 111.3
Agricultural............... 168.9 South Atlantic................ 152.9
Other...................... 18.6 West North Central............ 20.6
West South Central............ 67.7
Canada/Other.................. 3.3
Allowance for losses....... (5.5) Allowance for losses.......... (5.5)
------------------- --------------------
Total...................... $580.9 Total......................... $580.9
=================== ====================
Bonds with amortized cost of $24.7 million were non-income producing for
year ended December 31, 2001.
Depreciation expense on investment real estate was $0.3 million in 2001
and $0.6 million in 2000 and 1999. Accumulated depreciation was $2.8 million,
and $2.5 million at December 31, 2001, and 2000, respectively.
46
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 4 - Derivatives and Hedging Instruments
The Company uses various derivative instruments to hedge and manage its
exposure to changes in interest rate levels, foreign exchange rates, and equity
market prices, and to manage the duration of assets and liabilities.
The fair value of derivative instruments classified as assets at December
31, 2001 was $16.7 million, and appears on the cConsolidated balance sheet in
other assets. The fair value of derivative instruments classified as liabilities
at December 31, 2001 was $12.0 million and appears on the consolidated balance
sheet in other liabilities.
Fair Value Hedges
The Company uses interest rate futures contracts and interest rate swap
agreements as part of its overall strategies of managing the duration of assets
and liabilities or the average life of certain asset portfolios to specified
targets. Interest rate swap agreements are contracts with a counterparty to
exchange interest rate payments of a differing character (e.g., fixed-rate
payments exchanged for variable-rate payments) based on an underlying principal
balance (notional principal). The net differential to be paid or received on
interest rate swap agreements and currency rate swap agreements is accrued and
recognized as a component of net investment income.
The Company uses equity collar agreements to reduce its equity market
exposure with respect to certain common stock investments that the Company
holds. A collar consists of a written call option that limits the Company's
potential for gain from appreciation in the stock price as well as a purchased
put option that limits the Company's potential for loss from a decline in the
stock price.
Currency rate swap agreements are used to manage the Company's exposure to
foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Currency rate swap agreements are contracts
to exchange the currencies of two different countries at the same rate of
exchange at specified future dates. The net differential to be paid or received
on currency rate swap agreements is accrued and recognized as a component of net
investment income.
At December 31, 2001, the Company recognized net losses of $3.0 million,
related to the ineffective portion of its fair value hedges, and a net gain of
$0.1 million, related to the portion of the hedging instruments that were
excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Both of these amounts are
recorded in net realized investment and other gains and losses.At December 31,
2001, all of the Company's hedged firm commitments qualified as fair value
hedges.
Cash Flow Hedges
The Company used interest rate cap and floor agreements to hedge the
interest rate risk associated with minimum interest rate guarantees in certain
of its life insurance and annuity businesses. Amounts are reclassified from
other comprehensive income if interest rates fall below certain levels.
In 2001, the Company recognized no gains or losses related to the
ineffective portion of its cash flow hedges, and a net gain of $0.2 million
related to the portion of the hedging instruments that was excluded from the
assessment of hedge effectiveness. This amount is recorded in net realized
investment and other gains and losses. All of the Company's hedged forecasted
transactions qualified as cash flow hedges in 2001.
No amounts were reclassified from other accumulated comprehensive income
to earnings in 2001 and it is anticipated that no amounts will be reclassified
from other accumulated comprehensive income to earnings within the next twelve
months. The Company does not enter into hedging transactions for variable cash
flows thus the Company currently has no maximum length for which variable cash
flows are hedged.
In 2001, none of the Company's cash flow hedges have been discontinued
because of the probability that the original forecasted transaction would not
occur by the end of the originally specified time period documented at inception
of the hedging relationship.
There was no transition adjustment for the adoption of SFAS No.133
representing the accumulation in other comprehensive income of the effective
portion of the Company's cash flow hedges as of January 1, 2001. There were no
losses incurred for the effective portion of the change in fair value of
derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges and added to accumulated
other comprehensive income.
47
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 4 - Derivatives and Hedging Instruments - (Continued)
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
The Company enters into interest rate swap agreements, interest rate
futures contracts, and interest rate cap and floor agreements to manage exposure
to interest rates as described above under Fair Value Hedges without designating
the derivatives as hedging instruments.
Note 5 - Income Taxes
The Company is included in the consolidated federal income tax return of
John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. The federal income taxes of the Company
are allocated on a separate return basis with certain adjustments.
The components of income taxes were as follows:
Year Ended December 31
2001 2000 1999
------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Current taxes:
Federal............ $30.1 $15.2 $(1.5)
Foreign............ -- 0.6 0.1
------------------------------------------------------
30.1 15.8 (1.4)
Deferred taxes:
Federal............ 32.1 28.0 36.6
------------------------------------------------------
Total income taxes.... $62.2 $43.8 $35.2
======================================================
A reconciliation of income taxes computed by applying the federal income
tax rate to income before income taxes and the consolidated income tax expense
charged to operations follows:
Year Ended December 31
2001 2000 1999
-------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Tax at 35%................................ $73.0 $50.1 $36.3
Add (deduct):
Equity base tax...................... (9.0) (5.6) --
Prior years taxes.................... 2.1 -- (0.3)
Tax credits.......................... (0.4) (0.6) (0.1)
Foreign taxes........................ -- 0.6 0.1
Tax exempt investment income......... (5.6) (0.7) (0.7)
Other................................. 2.1 -- (0.1)
-------------------------------------------------
Total income taxes................ $62.2 $43.8 $35.2
=================================================
48
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 5 - Income Taxes - (Continued)
The significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and
liabilities were as follows:
December 31
2001 2000
----------------------------------
(in millions)
Deferred tax assets:
Policy reserve adjustments............ $ 238.1 $ 110.0
Other postretirement benefits......... 20.1 23.3
Book over tax basis of investments.... 12.0 7.8
Interest.............................. -- 7.5
Unrealized holding losses............. -- 1.4
----------------------------------
Total deferred tax assets......... 270.2 150.0
Deferred tax liabilities:
Deferred policy acquisition costs..... 373.7 199.1
Depreciation.......................... 2.1 1.8
Basis in partnerships................. 0.6 0.4
Market discount on bonds.............. 1.2 0.6
Lease income.......................... 47.0 35.4
Unrealized gains...................... 6.8 --
Other................................. -- 9.5
----------------------------------
Total deferred tax liabilities.... 431.4 246.8
----------------------------------
Net deferred tax liabilities...... $ 161.2 $ 96.8
==================================
The Company received an income tax refund of $32.4 million and made income
tax payments of $62.9 million and $13.2 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999,
respectively.
Note 6 - Reinsurance
The effect of reinsurance on premiums written and earned was as follows:
2001 2000 1999
Premiums Premiums Premiums
Written Earned Written Earned Written Earned
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Life Insurance:
Direct........................... $ 82.0 $ 82.0 $ 34.1 $ 34.1 $ 12.1 $ 12.1
Ceded............................ (21.9) (21.9) (5.5) (5.5) (3.2) (3.2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net life insurance premiums... $ 60.1 $ 60.1 $ 28.6 $ 28.6 $ 8.9 $ 8.9
================================================================================
For the year ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, benefits to
policyholders under life ceded reinsurance contracts were $3.8 million, $3.0
million and $ - million, respectively.
Reinsurance ceded contracts do not relieve the Company from its
obligations to policyholders. The Company remains liable to its policyholders
for the portion reinsured to the extent that any reinsurer does not meet its
obligations for reinsurance ceded to it under the reinsurance agreements.
Failure of the reinsurers to honor their obligations could result in losses to
the Company; consequently, estimates are established for amounts deemed or
estimated to be uncollectible. To minimize its exposure to significant losses
from reinsurance insolvencies, the Company evaluates the financial condition of
its reinsurers and monitors concentration of credit risk arising from similar
characteristics of the reinsurer.
49
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 7 - Commitments and Contingencies
The Company has extended commitments to purchase fixed maturity
investments, and other invested assets and issue mortgage loans on real estate
totaling $25.3 million, $14.3 million and $16.2 million, respectively, at
December 31, 2001. If funded, loans related to real estate mortgages would be
fully collateralized by related properties. The Company monitors the
creditworthiness of borrowers under long-term bond commitments and requires
collateral as deemed necessary. The estimated fair values of the commitments
described above aggregate $57.1 million at December 31, 2001. The majority of
these commitments expire in 2002.
In the normal course of its business operations, the Company is involved
with litigation from time to time with claimants, beneficiaries and others, and
a number of litigation matters were pending as of December 31, 2001. It is the
opinion of management, after consultation with counsel, that the ultimate
liability with respect to these claims, if any, will not materially affect the
financial position or results of operations of the Company.
During 1997, the Company entered into a court-approved settlement relating
to a class action lawsuit involving certain individual life insurance policies
sold from 1979 through 1996. In entering into the settlement, the Company
specifically denied any wrongdoing. The total reserve held in connection with
the settlement to provide for relief to class members and for legal and
administrative costs associated with the settlement amounted to $7.0 million and
$66.3 million at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Costs incurred
related to the settlement were $14.1 million and $66.0 million in 2001 and 1999,
respectively. No such costs were incurred in 2000. The estimated reserve is
based on a number of factors, including the estimated cost per claim and the
estimated costs to administer the claims.
During 1996, management determined that it was probable that a settlement
would occur and that a minimum loss amount could be reasonably estimated.
Accordingly, the Company recorded its best estimate based on the information
available at the time. The terms of the settlement agreement were negotiated
throughout 1997 and approved by the court on December 31, 1997. In accordance
with the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company contacted class members
during 1998 to determine the actual type of relief to be sought by class
members. The majority of the responses from class members were received by the
fourth quarter of 1998. The type of relief sought by class members differed from
the Company's previous estimates, primarily due to additional outreach
activities by regulatory authorities during 1998 encouraging class members to
consider alternative dispute resolution (ADR) relief. In 1999, the Company
updated its estimate of the cost of claims subject to alternative dispute
resolution relief and revised its reserve estimate accordingly. The reserve
estimate was further evaluated quarterly, and was adjusted as noted above, in
the fourth quarter of 2001. The adjustment to the reserve in 2001 was the result
of the Company being able to better estimate the cost of settling the remaining
claims, which on average tend to be larger, more complicated claims. The better
estimate comes from experience with actual settlements on similar claims.
Administration of the ADR component of the settlement continues to date.
Although some uncertainty remains as to the cost of claims in the final phase
(i.e., arbitration) of the ADR process, it is expected that the final cost of
the settlement will not differ materially from the amounts presently provided
for by the Company.
50
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 8 - Shareholder's Equity
(a) Common Stock
The Company was established in 1979 as a stock insurance company with
50,000 shares outstanding, wholly owned by its parent, John Hancock Life
Insurance Company. The Company has one class of capital stock, common stock ($50
par value, 50,000 shares authorized).
(b) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Losses)
---------------
(in millions)
Balance at January 1, 1999 ...................................... $ 12.3
Gross unrealized gains (losses) (net of deferred
income tax benefit of $18.0 million) ......................... (34.2)
Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses),
realized in net income (net of tax expense of
$1.7 million) ................................................ (3.1)
Adjustment to deferred policy acquisition costs
and present value of future profits (net of
deferred income tax expense of $6.2 million) ................. 11.6
------
Net unrealized gains (losses) ................................... (25.7)
------
Balance at December 31, 1999 .................................... $(13.4)
======
Balance at January 1, 2000 ...................................... $(13.4)
Gross unrealized gains (losses) (net of deferred
income tax expense of $9.7 million) .......................... 18.0
Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses),
realized in net income (net of tax expense of
$1.6 million) ................................................ (2.9)
Adjustment to deferred policy acquisition costs
and present value of future profits (net of
deferred income tax benefit of $2.1 million) ................. (3.9)
------
Net unrealized gains (losses) ................................... 11.2
------
Balance at December 31, 2000 .................................... $ (2.2)
======
Balance at January 1, 2001 ...................................... $ (2.2)
Gross unrealized gains (losses) (net of deferred
income tax expense of $7.2 million) .......................... 11.8
Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses),
realized in net income (net of tax benefit of
$1.1 million) ................................................ 2.1
Adjustment to deferred policy acquisition costs
and present value of future profits (net of
deferred income tax benefit of $3.2 million) ................. (6.0)
------
Net unrealized gains (losses) ................................... 7.9
Change in accounting principle .................................. 7.2
------
Balance at December 31, 2001 .................................... $ 12.9
======
51
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 8 - Shareholder's Equity - (Continued)
Net unrealized investment gains (losses), included in the consolidated
balance sheet as a component of shareholder's equity, are summarized as follows:
2001 2000 1999
------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Balance, end of year comprises:
Unrealized investment gains (losses) on:
Fixed maturities............................... $ 20.6 ($7.0) ($28.7)
Equity investments............................. 1.0 1.0 (1.4)
Derivatives and other.......................... 5.2 0.3 1.3
------------------------------------------------------
Total................................................ 26.8 (5.7) (28.8)
Amounts of unrealized investment (gains) losses
attributable to:
Deferred policy acquisition cost and present
value of future profits..................... (7.1) 2.1 8.1
Deferred federal income taxes.................. (6.8) 1.4 7.3
------------------------------------------------------
Total................................................ (13.9) 3.5 15.4
------------------------------------------------------
Net unrealized investment gains...................... $ 12.9 ($2.2) ($13.4)
======================================================
(c) Statutory Results
The Company adopted the new codified statutory accounting principles
(Codification) effective January 1, 2001. Codification changes prescribe
statutory accounting practices and results in changes to the accounting
practices that the Company and its domestic life insurance subsidiary use to
prepare their statutory-basis financial statements.
The Company and its domestic insurance subsidiary prepare their
statutory-basis financial statements in accordance with accounting practices
prescribed or permitted by the state of domicile. For the Company, the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts only recognizes statutory accounting practices
prescribed or permitted by Massachusetts insurance regulations and laws. The
National Association of Insurance Commissioners' "Accounting Practices and
Procedures" manual (NAIC SAP) has been adopted as a component of prescribed or
permitted practices by Massachusetts. The Commissioner of Insurance has the
right to permit other specific practices that deviate from prescribed practices.
Prior to 2001, the Commissioner had provided the Company approval to
recognize as an admitted asset the pension plan prepaid expense in accordance
with the requirements of SFAS No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions."
Beginning in 2001, the Commissioner has provided the Company with approval to
phase-in over a three-year period the impact of implementing the material
provisions of statutory SSAP No. 8, "Pensions." The Company's pension plan
prepaid expense recorded for statutory purposes amounted to $64.3 million, $55.6
million and $42.3 million at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 respectively.
Statutory net income is not impacted by this permitted practice.
52
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 8 - Shareholder's Equity - (Continued)
Statutory net income and surplus include the accounts of the Company and
its wholly-owned subsidiary, Investors Partners Life Insurance Company.
2001 2000 1999
-------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Statutory net income...... $ 13.1 $ 26.6 $ 77.5
Statutory surplus......... 647.0 527.2 468.8
Massachusetts has enacted laws governing the payment of dividends by
insurers. Under Massachusetts insurance law, no insurer may pay any shareholder
dividends from any source other than statutory unassigned funds without the
prior approval of Massachusetts Commissioner of Insurance. Massachusetts law
also limits the dividends an insurer may pay in any twelve month period, without
the prior permission of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Insurance
Commissioner, to the greater of (i) 10% of its statutory policyholders' surplus
as of the preceding December 31 or (ii) the individual company's statutory net
gain from operations for the preceding calendar year, if such insurer is a life
company.
Note 9 - Segment Information
The Company's reportable segments are strategic business units offering
different products and services. The reportable segments are managed separately,
as they focus on different products, markets or distribution channels.
Protection Segment. Offers a variety of individual life insurance,
including participating whole life, term life, universal life and variable life
insurance. Products are distributed through multiple distribution channels,
including insurance agents and brokers and alternative distribution channels
that include banks, financial planners, direct marketing and the Internet.
Asset Gathering Segment. Offers individual variable annuities. This
segment distributes its products through distribution channels including
insurance agents and brokers affiliated with the Company, securities brokerage
firms, financial planners, and banks.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in
the summary of significant accounting policies. Allocations of net investment
income are based on the amount of assets allocated to each segment. Other costs
and operating expenses are allocated to each segment based on a review of the
nature of such costs, cost allocations utilizing time studies, and other
relevant allocation methodologies.
Management of the Company evaluates performance based on segment after-tax
operating income, which excludes the effect of net realized investment and other
gains (losses) and unusual or non-recurring events and transactions. Segment
after-tax operating income is determined by adjusting GAAP net income for net
realized investment and other gains (losses), including gains and losses on
disposals of businesses and certain other items which management believes are
not indicative of overall operating trends. While these items may be significant
components in understanding and assessing the Company's financial performance,
management believes that the presentation of after-tax operating income enhances
its understanding of the Company's results of operations by highlighting net
income attributable to the normal, recurring operations of the business.
Amounts reported as segment adjustments in the tables below primarily
relate to: (i) certain net realized investment and other gains (losses), net of
related amortization adjustment for deferred policy acquisition costs; (ii)
benefits to policyholders and expenses incurred relating to the settlement of a
class action lawsuit against the Company involving certain individual life
insurance policies sold from 1979 through 1996; (iii) restructuring costs
related to our distribution systems and retail operations; (iv) the surplus tax
on mutual life insurance companies that was allocated by John Hancock to the
Company; (v) a charge for certain one time costs associated with John Hancock's
demutualization process; and (vi) cumulative effect of an accounting change.
53
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 9 - Segment Information - (Continued)
The following table summarizes selected financial information by segment for the
year ended or as of December 31 and reconciles segment revenues and segment
after-tax operating income to amounts reported in the consolidated statements of
income:
Asset
Protection Gathering Consolidated
------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Year ended December 31, 2001
Revenues:
Segment revenues ..................... $ 614.3 $ 62.2 $ 676.5
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses) ..................... (9.0) -- (9.0)
------------------------------------------
Revenues ............................. $ 605.3 $ 62.2 $ 667.5
==========================================
Net investment income ................ $ 229.2 $ (2.2) $ 227.0
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income ... $ 130.0 $ 22.2 $ 152.2
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses) ..................... (5.6) -- (5.6)
Surplus tax .......................... 9.1 -- 9.1
Class action lawsuit ................. (9.2) -- (9.2)
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax ................. (1.6) -- (1.6)
------------------------------------------
Net income ........................... $ 122.7 $ 22.2 $ 144.9
==========================================
Supplemental Information:
Equity in net income of investees
accounted for by the equity
method ............................. $ 2.7 $ -- $ 2.7
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs .................. 46.6 20.5 67.1
Income tax expense ................... 54.8 7.4 62.2
Segment assets ....................... $ 9,995.5 $ 1,717.7 $11,713.2
Net Realized Investment and Other Gains
(Losses) Data:
Net realized investment and other ....
gains (losses) ..................... $ (10.5) -- $ (10.5)
Less amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs related to net
realized investment and other
gains (losses) ..................... 1.5 -- 1.5
------------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net of related
amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs - per consolidated
financial statements................ (9.0) -- (9.0)
Less income tax effect ............... 3.4 -- 3.4
------------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net-after-tax
adjustment made to calculate
segment operating income ........... $ (5.6) -- $ (5.6)
==========================================
54
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 9 - Segment Information - (Continued)
Asset
Protection Gathering Consolidated
-------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Year ended December 31, 2000
Revenues:
Segment revenues...................... $ 530.8 $ 48.5 $ 579.3
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net................. (10.6) -- (10.6)
-------------------------------------------------
Revenues.............................. $ 520.2 $ 48.5 $ 568.7
=================================================
Net investment income................. $ 215.9 $ (2.5) $ 213.4
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income.... 96.0 6.3 102.3
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net................. (6.8) -- (6.8)
Surplus tax........................... 5.4 0.2 5.6
Other demutualization related costs... (0.5) (0.1) (0.6)
Restructuring charges................. (1.1) -- (1.1)
-------------------------------------------------
Net income............................ $ 93.0 $ 6.4 $ 99.4
=================================================
Supplemental Information:
Equity in net income of investees
accounted for by the equity
method.............................. $ 1.3 $ -- $ 1.3
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs................... 17.6 16.4 34.0
Income tax expense.................... 40.7 3.1 43.8
Segment assets........................ $ 9,326.9 $ 2,867.8 $ 12,194.7
Net Realized Investment and Other Gains
(Losses) Data:
Net realized investment and other
losses.............................. $ (14.4) -- $ (14.4)
Less amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs related to net
realized investment and other
gains (losses)...................... 3.8 -- 3.8
-------------------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net of related
amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs - per consolidated
financial statements................ (10.6) -- (10.6)
Less income tax effect................ 3.8 -- 3.8
-------------------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net-after-tax
a djustment made to calculate
segment operating................... $ (6.8) -- $ (6.8)
=================================================
55
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 9 - Segment Information - (Continued)
Asset
Protection Gathering Consolidated
-----------------------------------------
(in millions)
Year ended December 31, 1999
Revenues:
Segment revenues ......................... $ 488.0 $ 37.2 $ 525.2
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net .................... (4.8) -- (4.8)
-----------------------------------------
Revenues ................................. $ 483.2 $ 37.2 $ 520.4
=========================================
Net investment income .................... $ 178.1 $ (3.5) $ 174.6
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income ....... 108.0 6.8 114.8
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net .................... (3.1) -- (3.1)
Class action lawsuit ..................... (42.9) -- (42.9)
Other demutualization related costs ...... (0.3) (0.1) (0.4)
-----------------------------------------
Net income ............................... $ 61.7 $ 6.7 $ 68.4
=========================================
Supplemental Information:
Equity in net income of investees
accounted for by the equity
method ................................. $ (0.1) $ -- $ (0.1)
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs ...................... 4.6 8.5 13.1
Income tax expense ....................... 31.8 3.4 35.2
Segment assets ........................... $9,104.6 $2,869.6 $11,974.2
Net Realized Investment and Other Gains
(Losses) Data:
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses) ......................... $ (5.3) -- $ (5.3)
Less amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs related to net
realized investment gains (losses) ..... 0.5 -- 0.5
-----------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net of related
amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs - per consolidated
financial statements ................... (4.8) -- (4.8)
Less income tax effect ................... 1.7 -- 1.7
-----------------------------------------
Net realized investment and other
gains (losses), net-after-tax
adjustment made to calculate
segment operating income ............... $ (3.1) -- $ (3.1)
=========================================
The Company operates only in the United States. The Company has no
reportable major customers and revenues are attributed to countries based on the
location of customers.
56
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 10 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following discussion outlines the methodologies and assumptions used
to determine the fair value of the Company's financial instruments. The
aggregate fair value amounts presented herein do not represent the underlying
value of the Company and, accordingly, care should be exercised in drawing
conclusions about the Company's business or financial condition based on the
fair value information presented herein.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company to
determine the fair values of financial instruments:
Fair values for publicly traded fixed maturities (including redeemable
preferred stocks) are obtained from an independent pricing service. Fair values
for private placement securities and fixed maturities not provided by the
independent pricing service are estimated by the Company by discounting expected
future cash flows using a current market rate applicable to the yield, credit
quality and maturity of the investments. The fair value for equity securities is
based on quoted market prices.
The fair value for mortgage loans on real estate is estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses using interest rates adjusted to reflect the
credit characteristics of the loans. Mortgage loans with similar characteristics
and credit risks are aggregated into qualitative categories for purposes of the
fair value calculations. Fair values for impaired mortgage loans are measured
based either on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at
the loan's effective interest rate or the fair value of the underlying
collateral for loans that are collateral dependent.
The carrying amount in the balance sheet for policy loans, short-term
investments and cash and cash equivalents approximates their respective fair
values.
The fair value for fixed-rate deferred annuities is the cash surrender
value, which represents the account value less applicable surrender charges.
Fair values for immediate annuities without life contingencies are estimated
based on discounted cash flow calculations using current market rates.
The Company's derivatives include futures contracts, interest rate swap,
cap and floor agreements, currency rate swap agreements and equity collar
agreements. Fair values for these contracts are based on current settlement
values. These values are based on quoted market prices for the financial futures
contracts and brokerage quotes that utilize pricing models or formulas using
current assumptions for all swaps and other agreements.
The fair value for commitments approximates the amount of the initial
commitment.
57
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 10 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (Continued)
The following table presents the carrying amounts and fair values of the
Company's financial instruments:
December 31 December 31
2001 2000
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Value Value Value Value
--------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Assets:
Fixed maturities:
Held-to-maturity........................ $ 83.7 $ 82.1 $ 715.4 $ 686.8
Available-for-sale...................... 2,412.5 2,412.5 1,011.8 1,011.8
Equity securities:
Available-for-sale...................... 13.1 13.1 8.1 8.1
Mortgage loans on real estate............. 580.9 604.3 554.8 574.2
Policy loans.............................. 352.0 352.0 334.2 334.2
Short-term investments.................... -- -- 21.7 21.7
Cash and cash equivalents................. 115.4 115.4 277.3 277.3
Derivatives:
Futures contracts, net.................... -- -- 0.1 0.1
Interest rate swap agreements............. 8.8 8.8 -- --
Interest rate cap agreements.............. 3.5 3.5 2.1 2.1
Interest rate floor agreements............ 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Currency rate swap agreements............. 0.4 0.4 -- --
Equity collar agreements.................. 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.4
Liabilities:
Fixed rate deferred and immediate annuities 53.1 50.3 63.8 60.4
Derivatives:
Interest rate swap agreements............. 13.2 13.2 -- 1.2
Currency rate swap agreements............. 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.6
Commitments.................................. -- 57.1 -- 62.9
58
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ITEM 9. Changes in and disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.
Item omitted in accordance with General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10K.
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation.
Item omitted in accordance with General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10K.
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
Item omitted in accordance with General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10K.
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
Item omitted in accordance with General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10K.
PART IV
ITEM 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Documents filed as part of this report.
1. Financial Statements (See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data)
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors
Consolidated Financial Statements
Balance Sheets
Income Statements
Statements of Shareholder's Equity and Comprehensive Income
Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule I - Summary of Investments - Other Than Investments in Affiliates
Schedule III - Supplementary Insurance Information
Schedule IV - Reinsurance
Note: All other financial statement schedules are omitted because they are
inapplicable.
3. EXHIBITS. See exhibit on next page.
59
3. Exhibits
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------- -----------
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company
(incorporated by reference from Form S-1 Registration Statement of the
Company filed on September 25, 1995, File No. 33-62895)
3.2 By-laws of John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company (incorporated by
reference from Form S-1 Registration Statement of JHVLICO filed on
September 25, 1995, File No. 33-62895).
4(a) Form of Modified Guaranteed Annuity Contracts (incorporated by reference
from Form S-1 Registration Statement of John Hancock Variable Life
Insurance Company filed on September 25, 1995 File No. 33-62895)
4(b) Form of Certificate to be used in connection with the Contract filed as
Exhibit 4(a) (incorporated by reference from Form S-1 Registration
Statement of John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company filed on
September 25, 1995 File No. 33-62895)
4(c) Form of Application to be used in connection with the Contract filed as
Exhibit 4(a) (incorporated by reference from Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1
of Form S-1 Registration Statement of John Hancock Variable Life Insurance
Company filed on July 3, 1996, File No. 33-62895)
4(d) Form of group deferred combination fixed and variable annuity contract and
riders (incorporated by reference from Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 of
Form N-4 Registration Statement of John Hancock Variable Life Insurance
Company filed on August 9, 1999, File No. 333-81127)
21.1 Item omitted in accordance with General Instruction I2(b) of Form 10K.
24.1 Power of Attorney for Messrs. D'Alessandro, Paster and Reitano , and Mses.
Van Leer and Luddy (incorporated by reference from Form S-1 Registration
Statement of John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company filed on
September 25, 1995, File No. 33-62895). Power of Attorney for Ronald J.
Bocage (incorporated by reference from Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
this Form S-1 Registration Statement of John Hancock Variable Life
Insurance Company filed March 29, 1997, File No. 33-62895). Power of
Attorney for Bruce M. Jones and Paul Strong, (incorporated by reference
from Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to File No. 333-81127, Filed on May 4,
2000).
Any exhibit not included with this Form 10-K will be furnished to any
shareholder of record on written request and payment of up to $.25 per page plus
postage. Such requests should be directed to John Hancock Variable Life
Insurance Company, 200 Clarendon Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02117.
60
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
By:/s/ Michele G. Van Leer
-----------------------
Michele G. Van Leer
Vice Chairman and President
By:/s/ Earl W. Baucom
-----------------------
Earl W. Baucom
Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: March 22, 2002
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
For himself and as Attorney in Fact for:
David F. D'Alessandro Chairman
Michele G. Van Leer Vice Chairman and President
Robert S. Paster Director
Robert R. Reitano Director
Barbara L. Luddy Director
Bruce M. Jones Director
Paul Strong Director
61
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
SCHEDULE I - SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS -
OTHER THAN INVESTMENTS IN RELATED PARTIES
As of December 31, 2001
(in millions of dollars)
Column A Column B Column C Column D
TYPE OF INVESTMENT AMOUNT AT WHICH
SHOWN IN THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
COST (2) VALUE SHEET
-------------------------------------------------
Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale:
Bonds:
United States government and government agencies and
authorities $ 219.6 $ 214.8 $ 214.8
States, municipalities and political subdivisions 6.0 6.0 6.0
Foreign governments 7.2 7.6 7.6
Public utilities 189.3 192.9 192.9
Convertibles and bonds with warrants attached 25.9 25.1 25.1
All other corporate bonds 1,897.9 1,920.5 1,920.5
Certificates of deposits -- -- --
Redeemable preferred stock 46.0 45.6 45.6
-------------------------------------------------
Total fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale 2,391.9 2,412.5 2,412.5
-------------------------------------------------
Equity securities, available-for-sale:
Common stocks:
Public utilities -- -- --
Banks, trust and insurance companies -- -- --
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other 3.8 5.0 5.0
Non-redeemable preferred stock 8.3 8.1 8.1
-------------------------------------------------
Total equity securities, available-for-sale 12.1 13.1 13.1
-------------------------------------------------
Fixed maturity securities, held-to-maturity:
Bonds
United States government and government agencies and
authorities -- -- --
States, municipalities and political subdivisions -- -- --
Foreign governments -- -- --
Public utilities -- -- --
Convertibles and bonds with warrants attached -- -- --
All other corporate bonds 5.1 5.1 5.1
Certificates of deposits 78.6 77.0 78.6
Redeemable preferred stock -- -- --
-------------------------------------------------
Total fixed maturity securities, held-to-maturity 83.7 82.1 83.7
-------------------------------------------------
The condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
62
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
SCHEDULE I - SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS--
OTHER THAN INVESTMENTS IN RELATED PARTIES,-- (CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2001
(in millions of dollars)
Column A Column B Column C Column D
TYPE OF INVESTMENT AMOUNT AT WHICH
SHOWN IN THE
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE
COST (2) VALUE SHEET
-------------------------------------------------
Equity securities, trading:
Common stocks:
Public utilities $ -- $ -- $ --
Banks, trust and insurance companies -- -- --
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other -- -- --
Non-redeemable preferred stock -- -- --
-- -- --
-------------------------------------------------
Total equity securities, trading -- -- --
-------------------------------------------------
Mortgage loans on real estate, net (1) 586.4 xxxx 580.9
Real estate, net:
Investment properties (1) 21.4 xxxx 20.6
Acquired in satisfaction of debt (1) -- xxxx --
Policy loans 352.0 xxxx 352.0
Other long-term investments (2) 39.6 xxxx 39.6
Short-term investments -- xxxx --
-------------------------------------------------
Total investments $3,487.1 $ 2,507.7 $3,502.4
=================================================
(1) Difference from Column B is primarily due to valuation allowances due to
impairments on mortgage loans on real estate and due to accumulated
depreciation and valuation allowances due to impairments on real estate.
See note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.
(2) Difference from Column B is primarily due to operating gains (losses) of
investments in limited partnerships.
The condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
63
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
SCHEDULE III - SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION
As of December 31, 2001, 2000 and
1999 and for the year then ended
(in millions of dollars)
FUTURE POLICY OTHER POLICY
BENEFITS, LOSSES, CLAIMS AND
DEFERRED POLICY CLAIMS AND LOSS UNEARNED BENEFITS PREMIUM
SEGMENT ACQUISITION COSTS EXPENSES PREMIUMS PAYABLE REVENUE
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001:
Protection $ 918.4 $ 3,275.5 $ 221.0 $ 25.0 $ 60.1
Asset Gathering 142.4 63.2 -- -- --
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------- --------------
Total $ 1,060.8 $ 3,338.7 $ 221.0 $ 25.0 $ 60.1
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------- --------------
2000:
Protection $ 819.3 $ 2,698.5 $ 212.0 $ 11.1 $ 28.6
Asset Gathering 174.8 70.0 -- -- --
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------- --------------
Total $ 994.1 $ 2,768.5 $ 212.0 $ 11.1 $ 28.6
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------- --------------
1999:
Protection $ 707.8 $ 2,515.7 $ 175.2 $ 15.7 $ 8.9
Asset Gathering 147.3 50.6 -- -- --
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------- --------------
Total $ 855.1 $ 2,566.3 $ 175.2 $ 15.7 $ 8.9
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------- --------------
The condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
64
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
SCHEDULE III - SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION - (CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2001, 2000 and
1999 and for the year then ended
(in millions of dollars)
AMORTIZATION OF
DEFERRED POLICY
BENEFITS, CLAIMS, ACQUISITION COSTS,
LOSSES, AND EXCLUDING AMOUNTS
NET INVESTMENT SETTLEMENT RELATED TO REALIZED OTHER OPERATING
SEGMENT INCOME EXPENSES INVESTMENT GAINS EXPENSES
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001:
Protection $ 229.2 $ 285.5 $ 46.6 $ 72.8
Asset Gathering (2.2) 8.6 20.5 3.4
------------------- ------------------ ------------------------- -----------------------
Total $ 227.0 $ 294.1 $ 67.1 $ 76.2
------------------- ------------------ ------------------------- -----------------------
2000:
Protection $ 215.9 $ 242.2 $ 17.6 $ 100.5
Asset Gathering (2.5) 6.4 16.4 16.3
------------------- ------------------ ------------------------- -----------------------
Total $ 213.4 $ 248.6 $ 34.0 $ 116.8
------------------- ------------------ ------------------------- -----------------------
1999:
Protection $ 178.1 $ 192.3 $ 4.6 $ 100.6
Asset Gathering (3.5) 68.2 8.5 16.9
------------------- ------------------ ------------------------- -----------------------
Total $ 174.6 $ 260.5 $ 13.1 $ 117.5
------------------- ------------------ ------------------------- -----------------------
The condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
65
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
SCHEDULE IV - REINSURANCE
As of December 31, 2001
(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)
ASSUMED PERCENTAGE
CEDED TO FROM OF AMOUNT
GROSS OTHER OTHER NET ASSUMED TO
AMOUNT COMPANIES COMPANIES AMOUNT NET
-------------------------------------------------------------------
2001
Life insurance in force $ 119,332.2 $ 56,571.3 $ 35.1 $ 62,796.0 0.1%
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Premiums:
Life insurance $ 82.0 $ 21.9 $ -- $ 60.1 0.0%
Accident and health
insurance -- -- -- -- 0.0%
P&C -- -- -- -- 0.0%
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total $ 82.0 $ 21.9 $ -- $ 60.1 0.0%
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
2000
Life insurance in force $ 98,737.2 $ 39,495.8 $ 37.1 $ 59,278.5 0.1%
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Premiums:
Life insurance $ 34.1 $ 5.5 $ -- $ 28.6 0.0%
Accident and health
insurance -- -- -- -- 0.0%
P&C -- -- -- -- 0.0%
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total $ 34.1 $ 5.5 $ -- $ 28.6 0.0%
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
1999
Life insurance in force $ 75,674.7 $ 19,217.5 $ 38.5 $ 56,495.7 0.0%
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Premiums:
Life insurance $ 12.1 $ 3.2 $ -- $ 8.9 0.0%
Accident and health
insurance -- -- -- -- 0.0%
P&C -- -- -- -- 0.0%
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total $ 12.1 $ 3.2 $ -- $ 8.9 0.0%
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Note: The life insurance caption represents principally premiums from
traditional life insurance and life-contingent immediate annuities and excludes
deposits on investment products and the universal life insurance products.
The condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
66