U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C.
-------------------
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000
UNITED BANCSHARES, INC.
--------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
0-25976
(Registrant's file number)
PENNSYLVANIA 23-2802415
------------------------------- ------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
300 NORTH THIRD STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106
----------------------------------------- ----------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (732) 863-9000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g)f of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g)f of the Act:
Common Stock, $.01 par value
-----------------------------
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes __X__ No____
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K (ss.229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will
not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ( )
FORM 10-K
Index
PART I
Item No. Page
- -------- ----
1. Business...................................................... 3
2. Properties.................................................... 11
3. Legal Proceedings............................................. 13
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders........... 14
PART II
5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters........................................... 14
6. Selected Financial Data....................................... 16
7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations..................................... 17
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................... 30
9. Change in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure...................................... 30
PART III
10. Directors and Executive Officers of Registrant................ 30
11. Executive Compensation........................................ 32
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 34
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions................ 35
PART IV
14. Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K 36
UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ALL INFORMATION IS AS OF MARCH 28, 2001.
2
United Bancshares, Inc. (sometimes herein also referred to as the
"Company" or "UBS") has two classes of capital stock authorized - 2,000,000
shares of $.01 par value Common Stock and Series Preferred Stock (Series A
Preferred Stock). The Board of Directors designated a subclass of the common
stock, designated Class B Common Stock, by filing of Articles of Amendment to
its Articles of Incorporation on September 30, 1998. This Class of stock has all
of the rights and privileges of Common Stock with the exception of voting
rights. Of the 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock authorized, 250,000 have been
designated Class B Common Stock. There is no market for the Common Stock. None
of the shares of the Registrant's stock was sold within 60 days of the filing of
this Form 10-K. As of March 28, 2001 the aggregate number of the shares of the
Registrant's Common Stock outstanding was 1,099,421 (including 191,667 Class B
Non voting).
The Board of Directors of United Bancshares, Inc. designated one series of
the Series Preferred Stock (the "Series A Preferred Stock"), 500,000 authorized
of which 143,150 shares were outstanding as of March 28, 2001.
The Exhibit index is on page 36. There are 61 pages in the Form 10-K.
PART I
SPECIAL CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT
Certain of the matters discuss in this document and the documents
incorporated by reference herein, including matters discuss under the captions
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" may constitute forward looking statements for the purposes of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended and may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of United
Bancshares, Inc (the "UBS") to be materially different from future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward looking
statements. The words "expect," "anticipate," "intended," "plan," "believe,"
"seek," "estimate," and similar expressions are intended to identify such
forward-looking statements. The UBS's actual results may differ materially from
the results anticipated by the forward-looking statements due to a variety of
factors, including without limitation: (a) the effects of future economic
conditions on the UBS and its customers; (b) governmental monetary and fiscal
policies, as well as legislation and regulatory changes; ( c ) the risks of
changes in interest rates on the level and composition of deposits, loan demand,
and the values of loan collateral and securities, as well as interest-rate
risks; (d) the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts,
mortgage companies, consumer finance companies, credit unions securities
brokerage firms, insurance company's, money-market and mutual funds and other
financial institutions operating in the UBS's trade market area and elsewhere
including institutions operating locally, regionally, nationally and
internationally together with such competitors offering banking products and
services by mail, telephone, computer and the Internet; and (e) the failure of
assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for loan losses and
estimates in the value of collateral, and various financial assets and
liabilities and technological changes being more difficult or expensive than
anticipated. All written or oral forward-looking statements attribute to US are
expressly qualified in their entirety by use the foregoing cautionary
statements.
ITEM 1 -- BUSINESS
United Bancshares, Inc.
United Bancshares, Inc. ("Registrant" or "UBS") is a holding company for
United Bank of Philadelphia (the "Bank"). UBS was incorporated under the laws of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on April 8, 1993. The Registrant became the
Bank Holding Company of the Bank, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of
1956, as amended, on October 14, 1994.
The Bank commenced operations on March 23, 1992. UBS provides banking
services through the Bank. The principal executive offices of UBS and the Bank
are located at 300 North Third Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106. The
Registrant's telephone number is (215) 351-4600.
3
As of March 28, 2001, UBS and the Bank had a total of 70 employees.
United Bank of Philadelphia
The Bank, an African-American controlled, state-chartered member bank of the
Federal Reserve System is regulated by both the Federal Reserve Board and the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Banking (the "Department"). The
deposits held by the Bank are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation ("FDIC").
The Bank conducts all its banking activities through its five offices located
as follows: (i) Market Street Branch 714 Market Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; (ii) Center City Branch Two Penn Center, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; (iii) West Philadelphia Branch 37th and Lancaster Avenue,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, (iv) Mount Airy Branch 1620 Wadsworth Avenue,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and (v) Progress Plaza Branch 1015 North Broad
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Through these locations, the Bank offers a
broad range of commercial and consumer banking services. At December 31, 2000,
the Bank had total deposits aggregating approximately $83.2 million and had
total net loans outstanding of approximately $44.7 million. Although the Bank's
primary service area for Community Reinvestment Act purposes is Philadelphia
County, it also services, generally, the Delaware Valley, which consists of
portions of Montgomery, Bucks, Chester, and Delaware Counties in Pennsylvania;
New Castle County in Delaware; and Camden, Burlington, and Gloucester Counties
in New Jersey.
The city of Philadelphia is comprised of 353 census tracts and, based on 1990
census data, 204 or 58% of these are designated as low to moderate-income tracts
while 105 or 30% are characterized both as low to moderate-income and minority
tracts. The Bank's primary service area consists of a population of 1,577,815,
which includes a minority population of 752,309.
The Bank engages in the commercial banking business, serving the banking
needs of its customers with a particular focus on, and sensitivity to, groups
that have been traditionally under-served, including Blacks, Hispanics and
women. The Bank offers a wide range of deposit products, including checking
accounts, interest-bearing NOW accounts, money market accounts, certificates of
deposit, savings accounts and Individual Retirement Accounts.
The focus of the Bank's lending activities is on the origination of
commercial, consumer and residential loans. A broad range of credit products are
offered to the businesses and consumers in the Bank's service area, including
commercial loans, mortgage loans, student loans, home improvement loans, auto
loans, personal loans, and home equity loans. At March 28, 2001, the Bank's
maximum legal lending limit was approximately $1.1 million per borrower.
However, the Bank's internal Loan Policy limits the Bank's lending to $500,000
per borrower in order to diversify the loan portfolio. The Bank has established
relationships with correspondent banks to participate in loans that exceed the
Bank's internal policies or legal lending limits. The Board of Directors of the
Bank maintains the ability to waive its internal lending limit upon
consideration of a loan. The Board of Directors has exercised this power with
respect to loans and participations on a number of occasions.
The Bank also offers commercial and retail products. In the area of
commercial loans, the Bank has flexibility to develop loan arrangements targeted
at a customer's objectives. Typically, these loans are term loans or revolving
credit arrangements with interest rate, collateral and repayments terms, varying
based upon the type of credit, and various factors used to evaluate risk. The
Bank participates in the government-sponsored Small Business Administration
("SBA") lending program and when the Bank deems it appropriate, obtains SBA
guarantees for up to 90% of the loan amount. This guaranty is intended to reduce
the Bank's exposure to loss in its commercial loan portfolio. Commercial loans
are typically made of the basis of cash flow to support repayment with secondary
reliance placed on the underlying collateral.
The Bank's consumer loan program includes installment loans for home
improvement and the purchase of consumer goods and automobiles, student loans,
home equity and VISA secured and unsecured revolving lines of credit, and
checking overdraft protection. The Bank also offers residential mortgage loans
to its customers. In addition, the Bank offers safe deposit boxes, travelers'
checks, money orders, direct deposit of payroll and Social Security checks, wire
transfers and access to regional and national automated teller networks as well
as international and trust services through correspondent institutions.
4
Competition
There is substantial competition among financial institutions in the Bank's
service area. The Bank competes with local, regional and national commercial
banks, as well as savings banks and savings and loan associations. Many of these
banks and financial institutions have an amount of capital that allows them to
do more advertising and promotion and to provide a greater range of services to
customers. To date, the Bank has attracted, and believes it will continue to
attract its customers from the deposit base of such existing banks and financial
institutions largely due to the Bank's mission to service groups of people who
have traditionally been un-served and by its devotion to personalized customer
service. The Bank's strategy has been, and will continue to be, to emphasize
personalized services with special sensitivity to the needs of Blacks, Hispanics
and women and to offer competitive rates to borrowers and depositors.
In order to compete, the Bank relies upon personal contacts by the officers,
directors and employees of the Bank to establish and maintain relationships with
Bank customers. The Bank focuses its efforts on the needs of individuals and
small and medium-sized businesses. In the event there are customers whose loan
demands exceed the Bank's lending limit, the Bank will seek to arrange for such
loans on a participation basis with other financial institutions and
intermediaries. The Bank will also assist those customers requiring other
services not offered by the Bank to obtain such services from its correspondent
banks.
Registrant believes that a portion of the Bank's customer base is derived
from customers who were dissatisfied with the level of service provided at
larger financial institutions. While some of such customers have followed
officers of those institutions who were hired by the Bank, others were attracted
to the Bank by calling programs of its officers and referrals from other
customers. The Bank has sought, in the past, and intends to continue in the
future, to hire customer contact officers who have good relationships with
desirable customers. These personal relationships, provision of a high level of
customer services, and referrals from satisfied customers, form the basis of the
Bank's competitive approach, as opposed to advertising, rate competition or the
development of proprietary banking products, services or programs.
In the past, the principal competition for deposits and loans have been other
depository institutions. However, now the Bank also competes with other
financial intermediaries such as brokerage houses offering investment vehicles
to the general public. Other entities, both public and private, seeking to raise
capital through the issuance and sale of debt or equity securities are also
competitors with banks and savings and loan associations in the acquisition of
deposits.
Supervision and Regulation
The Holding Company, UBS, as a Pennsylvania business corporation, is subject
to the jurisdiction of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and of
state securities commissions for matters relating to the offering and sale of
its securities. Accordingly, if UBS wishes to issue additional shares of its
Common Stock, in order, for example, to raise capital or to grant stock options,
UBS will have to comply with the registration requirements of the Securities Act
of 1933 as amended and the applicable states securities laws, or find an
applicable exemption from registration.
UBS is subject to the provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as
amended (the "BHC Act"), and to supervision by the Federal Reserve Board. The
BHC Act requires UBS to secure the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board
before it owns or controls, directly or indirectly, more than 5% of the voting
shares of any corporation, including another bank. In addition, the BHC Act
prohibits UBS from acquiring more than 5% of the voting shares of, or interest
in, or all or substantially all of the assets of, any bank located outside
Pennsylvania, unless such an acquisition is specifically authorized bylaws of
the state in which such bank is located.
A bank holding company also is prohibited from engaging in or acquiring
direct or indirect control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any such
company engaged in non-banking activities unless the Federal Reserve Board, by
order or regulation, has found such activities to be closely related to banking
or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. In making
this determination, the Federal Reserve Board considers whether the performance
of these activities by a bank holding company would offer benefits to the public
that outweigh possible adverse effects.
5
As a bank holding company, UBS is required to file an annual report with the
Federal Reserve Board and any additional information that the Federal Reserve
Board may require pursuant to the BHC Act. The Federal Reserve Board may also
make examinations of the holding company and any or all of subsidiaries.
Further, under Section 106 of the 1970 amendments to the BHC Act and the Federal
Reserve Board's regulation, a bank holding company and its subsidiaries are
prohibited from engaging in certain tying arrangements in connection with any
extension of credit or provision of credit of any property or services. The so
called "anti-tying" provisions state generally that a bank may not extend
credit, lease, sell property or furnish any service to a customer on the
condition that the customer obtain additional credit or service from the bank,
its bank holding company or any other subsidiary of its bank holding company, or
on the condition that the customer not obtain other credit or services from a
competitor of the bank, its bank holding company or any subsidiary of its bank
holding company.
Subsidiary banks of a bank holding company are subject to certain
restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act and by state banking laws on any
extensions of credit to the bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries, on
investments in the stock or other securities of the bank holding company and on
taking of such stock or securities as collateral for loans to any borrower.
Under Pennsylvania law, UBS is permitted to control an unlimited number of
banks. However, UBS would be required under the BHC Act to obtain the prior
approval of the Federal Reserve Board before acquiring all or substantially all
of the assets of any bank, or acquiring ownership or control of any voting
shares of any other than the Bank, if, after such acquisition, would control
more than 5% of the voting shares of such bank.
The Bank. The deposits of United Bank of Philadelphia are insured by the
FDIC. The Bank is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the
Pennsylvania Department of Banking and by the FDIC. In addition, the Bank is
subject to a variety of local, state and federal laws that affect its operation.
Under the Pennsylvania Banking Code of 1965, as amended, the ("Code"), the
Registrant has been permitted to control an unlimited number of banks. However,
the Registrant would be required under the BHC Act to obtain the prior approval
of the Federal Reserve Board before it could acquire all or substantially all of
the assets of any bank, or acquiring ownership or control of any voting shares
of any bank other than the Bank, if, after such acquisition, the registrant
would own or control more than 5 percent of the voting shares of such bank. The
BHC Act has been amended by the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching
Efficiency Act of 1994 which authorizes bank holding companies, subject to
certain limitations and restrictions, to acquire banks located in any state.
In 1995, the Code was amended to harmonize Pennsylvania law with the
Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 to enable
Pennsylvania institutions to participate fully in interstate banking and to
remove obstacles to the choice by banks from other states engaged in interstate
banking to select Pennsylvania as a head office location. Some of the more
salient features of the amendment are described below.
A bank holding company located in Pennsylvania, another state, the District
of Columbia or a territory or possession of the United States may control one or
more banks, bank and trust companies, national banks, interstate banks and, with
the prior written approval of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking, may
acquire control of a bank and trust company or a national bank located in
Pennsylvania. A Pennsylvania-chartered institution may maintain branches in any
other state, the District of Columbia, or a territory or possession of the
United States upon the written approval of the Pennsylvania Department of
Banking.
Finally, a banking institution existing under the laws of another
jurisdiction may establish a branch in Pennsylvania if the laws of the
jurisdiction in which it is located permit a Pennsylvania-chartered institution
or a national bank located in Pennsylvania to establish and maintain a branch in
such jurisdiction on substantially the same terms and conditions.
6
In 1995, the Pennsylvania General Assembly enacted the Economic Development
Agency, Fiduciary and Lender Environmental Liability Protection Act which, among
other things, provides protection to lenders from environmental liability and
remediation costs under the environmental laws for releases and contamination
caused by others. A lender who engages in activities involved in the routine
practices of commercial lending, including, but not limited to, the providing of
financial services, holding of security interests, workout practices,
foreclosure or the recovery of funds from the sale of property shall not be
liable under the environmental acts or common law equivalents to the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental resources or to any other person by
virtue of the fact that the lender engages in such commercial lending practices.
A lender, however, will be liable if it, its employees or agents, directly cause
an immediate release or directly exacerbate a release of regulated substances on
or from the property, or knowingly and willfully compelled the borrower to
commit an action which caused such release or violation of an environmental act.
The Economic Development Agency, Fiduciary and Lender Environmental Liability
Protection Act, however, does not limit federal liability which still exists
under certain circumstances.
A subsidiary bank of a holding company is subject to certain restrictions
imposed by the Federal Reserve Act, as amended, on any extensions of credit to
the bank holding company or its subsidiaries, on investments in the stock or
other securities of the bank holding company or its subsidiaries, and on taking
such stock or securities as collateral for loans. The Federal Reserve Act, as
amended, and Federal Reserve Board regulations also place certain limitations
and reporting requirements on extensions of credit by a bank to principal
shareholders of its parent holding company, among others, and to related
interests of such principal shareholders. In addition, such legislation and
regulations may affect the terms upon which any person who becomes a principal
shareholder of a holding company may obtain credit from banks with which the
subsidiary bank maintains a correspondent relationship.
Federal law also prohibits the acquisition of control of a bank holding
company without prior notice to certain federal bank regulators. Control is
defined for this purpose as the power, directly or indirectly, to direct the
management or policies of the bank or bank holding company or to vote 25% or
more of any class of voting securities of the bank holding company.
From time to time, various types of federal and state legislation have been
proposed that could result in additional regulation of, and restrictions on, the
business of the Bank. It cannot be predicted whether any such legislation will
be adopted or how such legislation would affect the business of the Bank. As a
consequence of the extensive regulation of commercial banking activities in the
United States, the Bank's business is particularly susceptible to being affected
by federal legislation and regulations that may increase the costs of doing
business.
Because the Bank is a member bank of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal
Reserve Board possesses the power to prohibit institutions regulated by it (such
as the Bank) from engaging in any activity that would be an unsafe and unsound
banking practice or in violation of applicable law. Moreover, the Federal
Reserve Board is: (i) empowered to issue cease-and-desist or civil
money penalty orders against the Bank or its executive officers, directors
and/or principal shareholders based on violations of law or unsafe and unsound
banking practices; (ii) authorized to remove executive officers who
have participated in such violations or unsound practices; (iii) may restrict
lending by the Bank to its executive officers, directors, principal shareholders
or related interests thereof; (iv)may restrict management personnel of a bank
from serving as directors or in other management positions with certain
depository institutions whose assets exceed a specified amount or which have an
office within a specified geographic area. Additionally, the Bank Control Act
provides that no person may acquire control of the Bank unless the Federal
Reserve Board has been given 60-days prior written notice and within that time
has not disapproved the acquisition or extended the period for disapproval.
7
In April 1995, regulators revised the Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA") with
an emphasis on performance over process and documentation. Under the revised
rules, the five-point rating scale is still utilized by examiners to assign a
numerical score for a bank's performance in each of three areas: lending,
service and investment. Under the CRA, the FDIC is required to: (i) assess the
records of all financial institutions regulated by it to determine if these
institutions are meeting the credit needs of the community (including low-and
moderate-income neighborhoods) which they serve, and (ii) take this record into
account in its evaluation of any application made by any such institutions for,
among other things, approval of a branch or other deposit facility, office
relocation, a merger or an acquisition of bank shares. The CRA also requires the
federal banking agencies to make public disclosures of their evaluation of each
bank's record of meeting the credit needs of its entire community, including low
and moderate income neighborhoods. This evaluation will include a descriptive
rate ("outstanding," "satisfactory," "needs to improve" or "substantial
noncompliance") and a statement describing the basis for the rating. After its
most recent examination of the Bank under CRA, the FDIC gave the Bank a CRA
rating of "Outstanding".
Under the Bank Secrecy Act ("BSA"), banks and other financial institutions
are required to report to the Internal Revenue Service currency transactions of
more than $10,000 or multiple transactions in any one day of which the Bank is
aware that exceed $10,000 in the aggregate or other lesser amounts. Civil and
criminal penalties are provided under the BSA for failure to file a required
report, for failure to supply information required by the BSA or for filing a
false or fraudulent report.
Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994
The Bank believes that further merger activity within Pennsylvania is likely
to occur in the future, resulting in increased concentration levels in banking
markets within Pennsylvania and other significant changes in the competitive
environment. The Riegle-Neal allows adequately capitalized and managed bank
holding companies to acquire banks in any state starting one year after
enactment (September 29, 1995). Another provision of the Riegle-Neal Act allows
interstate merger transactions beginning June 1, 1997. States are permitted,
however, to pass legislation providing for either earlier approval of mergers
with out-of-state banks, or "opting-out" of interstate mergers entirely. Through
interstate merger transactions, banks will be able to acquire branches of
out-of-state banks by converting their offices into branches of the resulting
bank. The Riegle-Neal Act provides that it will be the exclusive means for bank
holding companies to obtain interstate branches. Under the Riegle-Neal Act,
banks may establish and operate a "de novo branch" in any State that "opts-in"
to de novo branching. Foreign banks are allowed to operate branches, either de
novo or by merger. These branches can operate to the same extent that the
establishment and operation of such branches would be permitted if the foreign
bank were a national bank or state bank. All these changes are expected to
intensify competition in local, regional and national banking markets. The
Pennsylvania Banking Code has been amended to enable Pennsylvania institutions
to participate fully in interstate banking (see discussion above).
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Act of 1991
GENERAL. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991
("FDIC Improvement Act") includes several provisions that have a direct impact
on the Bank. The most significant of these provisions are discussed below. In
order to minimize losses to the deposit insurance funds, the FDIC Improvement
Act establishes a format to monitor FDIC-insured institutions and to enable
prompt corrective action by the appropriate federal supervisory agency if an
institution begins to experience any difficulty. The FDIC Improvement Act
establishes five "capital" categories. They are: (1) well capitalized, (2)
adequately capitalized, (3)undercapitalized, (4) significantly undercapitalized,
and (5) critically undercapitalized. The overall goal of these new capital
measures is to impose more scrutiny and operational restrictions on banks as
they descend the capital categories from well capitalized to critically
undercapitalized.
Under Current regulations, a "well-capitalized" institution would be one that
has at least a 10% total risk-based capital ratio, a 6% Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio, a 5% Tier 1 Leverage Ratio, and is not subject to any written
order or final directive by its regulatory agency to meet and maintain a
specific capital level.
8
An "adequately capitalized" institution would be one that meets the required
minimum capital levels, but does not meet the definition of a "well-capitalized"
institution. The existing capital rules generally require banks to maintain a
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio of at least 4% and an 8% total risk-based capital ratio.
Since the risk-based capital requirement to be in the form of Tier 1 capital,
this also will mean that a bank would need to maintain at least 4% Tier 1
risk-based capital ratio. An institution must meet each of the required minimum
capital levels in order to be deemed "adequately capitalized." The most recent
notification dated January 13,2001, from the Federal Reserve authorities
categorized the Bank as "adequately capitalized" under the regulatory framework
for prompt and corrective action.
An "undercapitalized" institution is one that fails to meet one or more of
the required minimum capital levels for an "adequately capitalized" institution.
Under the FDIC Improvement Act, an "undercapitalized" institution must file a
capital restoration plan and is automatically subject to restrictions on
dividends, management fees and asset growth. In addition, the institution is
prohibited from making acquisitions, opening new branches or engaging in new
lines of business without the prior approval of its primary federal regulator. A
number of other restrictions may be imposed.
A "critically undercapitalized" institution is one that has a tangible equity
(Tier 1 capital) ratio of 2% or less. In addition to the same restrictions and
prohibitions that apply to "undercapitalized" and "significantly
undercapitalized" institutions, any institution that becomes "critically
undercapitalized" is prohibited from taking the following actions without the
prior written approval of its primary federal supervisory agency: engaging in
any material transactions other than in the usual course of business; extending
credit for highly leveraged transactions; amending its charter or bylaws; making
any material changes in accounting methods; engaging in certain transactions
with affiliates; paying excessive compensation or bonuses; and paying interest
on liabilities exceeding the prevailing rates in the institution's market area.
In addition, a "critically undercapitalized" institution is prohibited from
paying interest or principal on its subordinated debt and is subject to being
placed in conservatorship or receivership if its tangible equity capital level
is not increased within certain mandated time frames.
Management cannot anticipate what changes Congress may enact, or, if enacted,
their impact on UBS's financial position and reported results of operation.
Financial Services Act of 1999
On March 11, 2000 the Financial Services Act of 1999 (the "FSA"),sometimes
referred to as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, became effective.
The FSA repeals provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act, which had prohibited
commercial banks and securities firms from affiliating with each other and
engaging in each other's businesses. Thus, many of the barriers prohibiting
affiliations between commercial banks and securities firms have been eliminated.
The FSA amends the Act to allow new "financial holding companies" ("FHC") to
offer banking, insurance, securities and other financial products to consumers.
Specifically, the FSA amends Section 4 of the Act in order to provide for a
framework for the engagement in new financial activities. Bank holding companies
may elect to become a financial holding company if all its subsidiary depository
institutions are well capitalized and well managed. If these requirements are
met, a bank holding company may file a certification to that effect with the
Federal Reserve Board and declare that it elects to become a FHC. After the
certification and declaration is filed, the FHC may engage either de novo or
through an acquisition in any activity that has been determined by the Federal
Reserve Board to be financial in nature or incidental to such financial
activity. Bank holding companies may engage in financial activities without
prior notice to the Federal Reserve Board if those activities qualify under the
new list in Section 4(k) of the Act. However, notice must be given to the
Federal Reserve Board within 30 days after a FHC has commenced one or more of
the financial activities.
9
Under the FSA, a bank subject to various requirements is permitted to engage
through "financial subsidiaries" in certain financial activities permissible for
affiliates of FHCs. However, to be able to engage in such activities the bank
must continue to be well capitalized and well managed and receive at least a
"satisfactory" rating in its most recent Community Reinvestment Act examination.
UBS cannot be certain of the effect of the foregoing recently enacted
legislation on its business, although there is likely to be consolidation among
financial services institutions and increased competition for UBS.
Privacy of Consumer Financial Information
The FSA also a contains a provision designed to protect the privacy of each
consumer's financial information in a financial institution. Pursuant to the
requirements of the FSA, the financial institution regulators (the "regulators")
have effective November 13, 2000, promulgated final regulations (the
"regulations") intended to better protect the privacy of a consumer's financial
information maintained in financial institutions. Compliance with the
regulations are optional until July 1 2001.
The regulations are designed to prevent financial institutions, such as the
Bank, from disclosing a consumer's nonpublic personal information to third
parties that are not affiliated with the financial institution.
However, financial institutions can share a customer's personal information
or information about business with their affiliated companies. The regulations
also provide that financial institutions can disclose nonpublic personal
information to nonaffiliated third parties for marketing purposes but the
financial institution must provide a description of its privacy policies to the
consumers and give the consumers an opportunity to opt-out of such disclosure
and, thus, prevent disclosure by the financial institution of the consumer's
nonpublic personal information to nonaffiliated third parties.
The regulations, among other things, provide guidance concerning what are
"nonpublic personal information", "consumers", and "customers", as well as about
the required timing for notices to customers and the means by which customers
can exercise their right to opt-out of disclosure of their personal information.
These privacy regulations will affect how consumer information is transmitted
through diversified financial companies and conveyed to outside vendors.
Although it is not possible at this time to assess the impact of the privacy
regulations on financial institutions or the Bank, the Bank does not believe the
privacy regulations will have a material adverse impact on its operations in the
near term. Nevertheless, the implementation of the privacy regulations have and
will continue to require significant effort by the staff for the Bank and UBS.
Consumer Protection Rules - Sale of Insurance Products
In addition, as mandated by Section 305 of the FSA, the regulators have
published consumer protection rules (the "Rules") which apply to the retail
sales practices, solicitation, advertising or offers of insurance products,
including annuities, by depository institutions such as Bank and their
subsidiaries. The Rules are proposed to be effective on April 1, 2001.
In very brief summary the Rules provide, that before the sale of insurance or
annuity products can be completed, disclosures must be made that state that such
insurance products, are not deposits or other obligation of or guaranteed by the
FDIC or any other agency of the United States, the Bank or its affiliates. In
the case of an insurance product, including an annuity, that involves an
investment risk, that there is an investment risk involved with the product,
including a possible loss of value.
The Rules also provide that the Bank may not condition an extension of credit
on the consumer's purchase of an insurance product or annuity from Bank or its
affiliates or on the consumer's agreement not obtain or a prohibition on the
consumer obtaining an insurance product or annuity from an unaffiliated entity.
10
The Rules also requires formal acknowledgment from the consumer that such
disclosures have been received. In addition, to the extent practical, the Bank
must keep insurance and annuity sales activities physically separate from the
areas where retail sales are routinely accepted from the general public.
The Bank currently does not market insurance product. The Rules will
significantly affect the manner in which the Bank would market insurance
products, if the Bank does so in the future.
Governmental Policies and Future Legislation
As the enactment of the FSA confirms, from time to time, various proposals
are made in the United States Congress as well as Pennsylvania legislature and
by various bank regulatory authorities which would alter the powers of, and
place restrictions on, different types of bank organizations. Among current
proposals which could be significance to UBS or the Bank are the continued
liberalization of the restrictions on the acquisition of out-of-state banks by
bank holding companies, the expansion of the powers of banks and thrift
institutions, the liberalization of the restrictions upon the activities in
which bank holding companies may engage, the imposition of limitations on
interest rates and service charges, certain consumer legislation and the
requirement to provide certain basic banking services. It is impossible to
predict whether any of the proposals will be adopted and the impact, if any, of
such adoption on the business of UBS or the Bank. As a consequence of the
extensive regulation of commercial banking activities in the United States,
UBS's business is particularly susceptible to being affected by federal and
state legislation and regulations that may increase the costs of doing business.
Regulatory Actions.
In February 2000, as a result of a regulatory examination completed in
December 1999, the Bank entered into a Written Agreement with its primary
regulators with regard to, among other things, achievement of agreed-upon
capital levels, implementation of a viable earnings/strategic plan, adequate
funding of the allowance for loan losses, the completion of a management review
and succession plan, and improvement in internal controls. See, Item 7,
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS.
Beginning in 1996, the Bank has operated under a Supervisory Letter from its
primary regulator. The Supervisory Letter prevents the Bank and the Company from
declaring or paying dividends without the prior written approval of its
regulators and prohibits the Bank and Company from issuing long-term debt.
ITEM 2 -- PROPERTIES
Corporate Headquarters
In August 1999, the Bank moved its corporate headquarters from the branch
facility at 714 Market Street to 300 North Third Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania. In October 2000, the Bank purchased this building from a former
officer in conjunction with the settlement of a legal matter for approximately
$1.4 million. Before its purchase, the Bank leased this building from this
officer under a 10-year non-cancelable capital lease. The facility consists of
25,000 square feet including executive offices, operations, finance, human
resource, security and loss prevention functions. The Bank sublets approximately
1400 square feet to Tucci & Tannenbaum, P.C.
Market Street Branch
The Bank's Market Street Branch is located on the first floor of a
multi-tenant retail and commercial office building at 714 Market Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Bank occupies approximately 5,700 square feet of
space pursuant to a lease that expires on February 28, 2002. The lease has
renewal options for two five-year periods and is subject to escalation clauses.
The first floor contains a banking lobby, the vault and customer service area.
The aggregate monthly rent for this location is $9,069.
11
Mt. Airy Branch
The Bank operates a branch at 1620 Wadsworth Avenue, in the Mt. Airy section
of Philadelphia. This facility, comprising a retail banking lobby, teller area,
offices, vault and storage space is currently leased at a monthly rental of
$3,375.
Center City Branch
The Bank operates a branch location at Two Penn Center, 15th Street and JFK
Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Bank leases approximately 4,769
square feet at its Two Penn Center location. The space includes lobby, teller
area, customer service area, primary lending area and administrative offices, as
well as a vault. The aggregate monthly rent for this location is $13,115.
Frankford Branch
In 1995, the Bank purchased a branch facility at 4806 Frankford Avenue. In
September 2000, the Bank closed this facility. It is expected to be sold in
during 2001.
West Girard Branch
The Bank leases a facility located at 2836 West Girard Avenue. The branch
operations of this facility were discontinued in September 2000. An ATM machine
will remain operational at this facility until the April 30, 2001 lease
expiration. The aggregate monthly rental for the facility is $1,375.
West Philadelphia Branch
On July 22, 1996, the Bank acquired a branch location at 3750 Lancaster
Avenue from PNC Bank. The facility is comprised of approximately 3,000 square
feet. The main floor houses teller and customer service areas, a drive-up teller
facility and automated teller machine. The basement provides storage for the
facility. The aggregate monthly rental is approximately $2,625 exclusive of
taxes, insurance, utilities and janitorial service.
University City Branch
The Bank leased a branch facility located at 40th and Chestnut Streets, in
the University City Section of West Philadelphia from First Union National Bank
("First Union"). This facility was acquired from First Union in September, 1999.
In September 2000, the branch operations of this facility were consolidated with
the Bank's West Philadelphia branch office. In October 2000, the Bank exercised
its option to purchase this facility from First Union and immediately sold it
for a gain of approximately $329,000.
Progress Plaza Branch
The Bank leases a branch facility located at 1015 North Broad Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The facility comprises a teller and customer service
area, lobby and vault. The aggregate monthly rental for this facility is $3,656
per month.
12
ITEM 3 -- LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Monument Financial v. United Bank of Philadelphia
A writ of summons was issued at the request of Monument Financial Group, Inc.
and Ronald Hatfield, respectively, an United Bank of Philadelphia (the "Bank")
account holder and its principal (collectively the "Plaintiffs") to commence an
action against the Bank in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County on
June 28,1999. The suit involves the processing of account transactions in
alleged non-compliance with the deposit contract. This conduct by the Bank
allegedly resulted in a loss to the Plaintiffs in an undetermined amount. The
Plaintiffs filed a complaint on July 28, 1999. This action was voluntarily
dismissed by the Plaintiffs on the February 4, 2000.
William Jairett et al v. First Montauk Securities Corp., et al
A complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania by William Jairett and others against Ronald Hatfield
and certain related parties (collectively the " Hatfield Defendants"), the
Monument Financial Group, Inc ("Monument Financial") as well as United Bank of
Philadelphia (the "Bank"). In summary the alleged claims against the Bank are
that the Bank failed to properly disbursed funds from the Monument Financial
deposit account maintained with the Bank, because the Bank disbursed funds, in
noncompliance with the deposit contract due to the failure to require the
necessary signatures needed to authorize disbursements and withdrawals from the
account. The Court has recently granted, in part, a motion to further amend an
amended answer and cross claim by the Hatfield Defendants and Monument Financial
to include claims of fraud and misrepresentation and conspiracy against the Bank
and other defendants but has denied a motion for leave to amend to include a
cross claim for tortuous interference against the Bank and others.
The Bank believes that certain insurance coverage is available to it to
provide partial protection against any loss by the Bank due to these claims and
to defray part of the legal fees for defense against the claims and the Bank is
in the process of determining the complete extent of its insurance coverage. The
Bank intends to vigorously defend the claims which have been made against it.
An action, similar to the federal court action, has been filed against the
Bank and the others defendants in the Common Pleas Court of Philadelphia making
allegations similar to those in the Jairett litigation. That action was filed to
toll the statute of limitations in the event the federal litigation was
dismissed. At this time the parties are not actively pursuing the Common Pleas
Court litigation.
Chappell v. United Bank of Philadelphia
On May 26, 2000, upon receipt of independent consultant reports confirming
certain conduct engaged in by Emma C. Chappell, United Bancshares' former
Chairman, President, and CEO of the United Bancshares and the Bank, Emma C.
Chappell's employment was terminated. On June 29, 2000, Emma C. Chappell filed a
demand for arbitration seeking certain contractual payments. In July 2000,
United Bancshares responded to the demand for arbitration and separately
commenced a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District
of Pennsylvania seeking damages arising from transactions and occurrences
relating to Emma C. Chappell's April 1999 acquisition of the office building
rented by United Bancshares.
The parties (ECC Properties/Emma C. Chappell and United Bancshares) reached a
settlement on October 16, 2000 through which United Bancshares obtained title to
the office building and several adjacent properties for $1.34 million, stopped
paying rent to its former Chairman and the parties released each other from all
other claims or disputes. In addition, this settlement included Emma Chappell's
resignation from United Bancshares'/United Bank of Philadelphia Board of
Directors.
13
Rococo LLC v. United Bank of Philadelphia
On May 15, 2000, Rococo LLC, the contractor of W. T. Development Company,
the Bank's borrower, filed a complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware
County. The complaint seeks damages from the W. T. Development Company and
Bonsall Village, Inc. partnership developers of the residential construction
project known as Bonsall Village, for alleged nonpayment of construction
invoices and also seeks damages from the Bank of $34,474 alleging that the Bank
acted in concert with W. T. Development Company with respect to nonpayment of
certain of those invoices. The Bank has responded to an amended complaint and
the Bank believes that it has substantial defenses and will vigorously contest
the claims in the complaint. While discovery has not begun, based on the
preliminary information which has been gathered, the Bank believes that the
claims against it are not well founded.
In March of 2001, W. T. Development Company and Bonsall Village, Inc., the
Bank's codefendants in the litigation, filed a petition to obtain leave of court
to file a crossclaim against the Bank seeking damages against he Bank for its
alleged failure to honor its commitment to finance the phased construction of
the Bonsall Village project, as a result of which W. T. Development Company and
Bonsall Village, Inc. allegedly were unable to fulfill their obligations to the
plaintiff, Rococo L.L.C. If the Bank is found liable on such crossclaim the
codefendants will seek to hold the Bank liable for any damages due the
plaintiff, Rococo, L.L.C., from the codefendants. The Bank believes that it has
substantial defenses against such crossclaim and will vigorously contest those
claims.
NO OTHER MATERIAL CLAIMS HAVE BEEN INSTITUTED OR THREATENED BY OR AGAINST
REGISTRANT OR ITS AFFILIATES OTHER THAN IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS.
ITEM 4 -- SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The following matters were submitted to a vote of Registrant's security holders
since the Registrant's last periodic filing.
1. On October 27, 2000 the Annual Meeting of shareholders of UBS was held.
At the Annual Meeting Mr. L. Armstead Edwards, Ms. Marionette Y. Frazier, and
Ernest L. Wright were elected directors, with the voting for those directors, as
follows:
L. Armstead Edwards For 48.19% Against 0% Abstain 2.83%
401,630 0 23,550
Marionette Y. Frazier For 48.18% Against 0% Abstain 2.84%
401,506 0 23,675
Ernest L. Wright For 48.05% Against 0% Abstain 2.96%
400,506 0 24,675
Refer to page 30 for a list of individuals who continued in office as
directors of UBS.
2. The UBS shareholders ratified the Board of Directors selection of Grant
Thornton, LLP as UBS's independent auditors for the year 1999, with the voting
for such ratification, as follows:
For 50.24% Against .13% Abstain .65%
418,699 1,072 5,410
3. The UBS shareholders ratified the amendment of UBS's Articles of
Incorporation to expand the authorized shares of Class B Common Stock by 500,000
shares, with the voting for such ratification, as follows:
For 47.70% Against 2.37% Abstain .94%
397,531 19,790 7,860
PART II
ITEM 5 -- MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Common Stock
As of March 28, 2001 there were 3,170 shareholders of record of UBS's
Common Stock.
The Common Stock is not traded on any national exchange or otherwise traded
in any recognizable market. Prior to December 31, 1993, the Bank conducted a
limited offering (the "Offering") pursuant to a registration exemption provided
in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 (the "Act"). The
price-per-share during the Offering was $12.00. Prior to the Offering, the Bank
conducted an initial offering of the Common Stock (the "Initial Offering") at
$10.00 per share pursuant to the same registration exemption.
14
Beginning April 24, 1995, Registrant commenced a private offering solely to
existing stockholders of 250,000 shares of its common stock and 750,000 warrants
to purchase a share of the common stock. 18,465 shares and 55,395 warrants have
been sold pursuant to this offering. Each unit, consisting of one share of
common stock and three warrants to purchase one share of common stock in each of
three subsequent years (total 3 shares), were issued at $12.00 per unit. The
warrant exercise price was $8.00 per share for the 1996 Warrant, was $9.00 per
share for the 1997 Warrant, and was $10.00 per share for the 1998 Warrant. The
units were offered pursuant to an exemption from registration contained in
section 4(2) and 3(a)(5) of the Act. No underwriters were used and no
commissions were paid as a result of this offering. The offering closed on
December 31, 1995. In December 1995, the Registrant sold 41,666 shares of
Registrant's common stock in an offering exempt from registration pursuant to
section 4(2) of the Act at a purchase price of $12.00 per share. This sale was
accomplished pursuant to a commitment to purchase these securities issued in
December 1994.
Beginning May 10, 1996, Registrant commenced a private offering solely to
existing stockholders of 250,000 shares of its common stock. 6,934 shares were
sold pursuant to this offering. The stock was offered pursuant to an exemption
from registration contained in 4(2) and 3(a)(5) of the Act. During 1996, the
Registrant received, $55,536 and issued 6,942 shares as a result of warrant
exercises by shareholders to purchase common stock at a price of $8.00 per
share. Beginning May 19, 1997, Registrant commenced an offering solely to
existing stockholders of 250,000 shares of its common stock, initially on a
pro-rata basis. 3,550 shares were sold pursuant to this offering. The stock was
offered pursuant to an exemption contained in 4(2) and 3(a)(5) of the Act.
During 1997, the Registrant received $34,710 and issued 3,856 shares as a result
of exercise of the 1997 warrants at $9.00 per share. During 1998, Registrant
received $14,922 as a result of the exercise of the 1998 Warrants at $10.00 per
share and sold 6,492 shares of common stock as a result to its offering solely
to stockholders of record. This offering was exempt pursuant to an exemption
from registration contained in sections 4(2) and 3(a)(5) of the Act. As of March
31, 1999, there were no warrants outstanding to purchase common stock of the
Bank.
In June 2000 and December 2000, respectively, the Bank received $411,809 and
$436,212 and issued 34,317 and 36,351 shares, respectively, as a result of the
purchase of common stock by members of the Bank's board of directors in a
limited offering at a price of $12.00 per share.
Class B Common Stock
On September 30, 1998, the Registrant filed Articles of Amendment to its
Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania. The filing amended the Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant
to designate a sub-class of its Common Stock as Class B Common Stock. Pursuant
to the terms of the amendment, holders of the Class B Common Stock have all
rights of Common Stockholders, with the exception of voting rights.
Effective October 9, 1998, the Registrant sold 83,333 shares of its Class B
Common Stock to First Union Corporation ("First Union") for a purchase price of
$12 per share. The sale was exempt from registration requirements pursuant to
section 4(2) of the Act.
Effective February 8, 1999, the Registrant sold 83,333 shares of its Class B
Common Stock to First Union for a purchase price of $12 per share. The sale was
exempt from registration requirements pursuant to section 4(2) of the Act.
Effective September 23, 1999, Registrant sold 25, 000 shares of its Class B
Common Stock to First Union Corporation at a purchase price of $12 per share.
The sale was exempt from registration pursuant to section 4(2) of the Act.
Effective December, 1999, the Registrant sold 5,000 shares of its Class B
Common Stock to an individual for a purchase price of $12 per share. The sale
was exempt from registration pursuant to section 4(2) of the Act.
Series A Preferred Stock
Registrant has engaged in the sale of Series A Preferred Stock which has the
characteristics identified in the UBS Articles of Incorporation incorporated by
reference as an Exhibit hereto pursuant to an exemption from registration
contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
15
Dividends
Registrant has not, during the three most recent fiscal periods declared or
paid any cash or stock dividends. The Pennsylvania Banking Code of 1965, as
amended, provides that cash dividends may be declared and paid only from
accumulated net earnings and that, prior to the declaration of any dividend, if
the surplus of a bank is less than the amount of its capital, the bank shall,
until surplus is equal to such amount, transfer to surplus an amount which is at
least ten percent of the net earnings of the bank for the period since the end
of the last fiscal year or any shorter period since the declaration of a
dividend. If the surplus of a bank is less than 50% of the amount of its
capital, no dividend may be declared or paid by the Bank without the prior
approval of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking.
Under the Federal Reserve Act, if a bank has sustained losses equal to or
exceeding its undivided profits then on hand, no dividend shall be paid, and no
dividends can ever be paid in an amount greater than such bank's net profits
less losses and bad debts. Cash dividends must be approved by the Board if the
total of all cash dividends declared by a bank in any calendar year, including
the proposed cash dividend, exceeds the total of the Bank's net profits for that
year plus its retained net profits from the preceding two years less any
required transfers to surplus or to a fund for the retirement of preferred
stock. Under the Federal Reserve Act, the Board has the power to prohibit the
payment of cash dividends by a bank if it determines that such a payment would
be an unsafe or unsound banking practice. As a result of this regulation, the
Bank, and therefore the Registrant, whose only source of income is dividends
from the Bank, will be unable to pay any dividends while an accumulated deficit
exists. The Registrant does not anticipate that dividends will be paid for the
foreseeable future.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Act generally prohibits all payments of
dividends by a bank which is in default of any assessment to the FDIC.
In April 1993, the shareholders of United Bank of Philadelphia (the Bank)
voted in favor of the formation of a bank holding company, United Bancshares,
Inc. (the Company). Accordingly, in October 1994 the Company became a bank
holding company in conjunction with the issuance of its common shares in
exchange for the common shares of the Bank. The financial statements are
prepared on a consolidated basis to include the accounts of the Company and the
Bank.
The purpose of this discussion is to focus on information about the Bank's
financial condition and results of operations which is not otherwise apparent
from the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. This
discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements presented elsewhere in this report.
ITEM 6. -- SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Selected Financial Data
Year ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
- --------------------------------------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Net interest income ............... $ 5,415 $ 5,264 $ 5,241 $ 4,744 $ 4,259
Provision for loan losses ......... 565 1,007 351 97 85
Noninterest income ................ 3,197 2,226 1,816 1,517 1,118
Noninterest expense ............... 8,801 7,714 6,696 5,983 6,123
Net income (loss) ................. (755) (1,230) 10 181 (832)
Net income (loss) per share - basic (0.72) (1.24) 0.01 0.22 (1.03)
Balance sheet totals:
Total assets ................... $ 93,533 $ 137,249 $121,983 $108,914 $ 96,769
Net loans ...................... 44,743 59,444 57,271 73,694 69,097
Investment securities .......... 35,014 51,433 43,196 18,253 14,460
Deposits ....................... 83,238 124,766 109,063 99,427 88,761
Shareholders' equity ........... 9,350 9,027 8,904 7,059 6,759
Ratios:
Equity to assets ............. 7.74% 8.07% 6.40% 6.61% 7.45%
Return on assets ............. (0.63)% (1.03)% 0.01% 0.18% (0.89)%
Return on equity ............. (8.08)% (12.71)% 0.14% 2.69% (12.02)%
16
ITEM 7. -- MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of Operations
Summary
The Company recorded a net loss of approximately $755,000 for 2000 ($0.72 per
share) compared to a net loss of approximately $1,230,000 ($1.24 per share) for
1999 and net income of approximately $10,000 ($0.01 per share) in 1998. During
2000, the Bank's financial results were favorably impacted by a lower level of
loan loss provisions compared to 1999 as well as the implementation of many
expense control measures. A more detailed explanation for each component of
earnings is included in the sections below.
During 2000, management implemented an asset reduction/capital improvement
plan that resulted in a $41.5 million decline in the Bank's deposit levels. The
Bank now faces the challenge of re-building the level of earning assets to
generate core profitability while maintaining adequate capital levels and
meeting the Bank's mission of serving the un-served communities in the
Philadelphia region.
The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans decreased from
2.57% in 1999 to 1.24% in 2000. This decrease is attributable to aggressive
charge-offs of problem loans during 2000. The Bank had made significant
provisions for many of these loans in prior years.
Table 1--Average Balances, Rates, and Interest Income and Expense Summary
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------------------------ --------------------------- --------------------------
AVERAGE YIELD/ AVERAGE YIELD/ AVERAGE YIELD/
BALANCE INTEREST RATE BALANCE INTEREST RATE BALANCE INTEREST RATE
------------------------------ --------------------------- --------------------------
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Interest-earning assets:
Loans .............................. $ 55,262 $4,655 8.42% $ 68,526 $5,589 8.16% $ 71,338 $6,270 8.79%
Investment securities
held-to-maturity ............... 28,659 1,875 6.54 21,692 1,226 5.65 11,436 746 6.52
Investment securities
available-for-sale ............. 18,044 1,284 7.12 9,275 612 6.60 8,392 557 6.64
Federal funds sold ................. 5,518 339 6.15 13,753 681 4.95 12,959 688 5.31
-------- ------- -------- ------ -------- ------
Total interest-earning assets . 107,483 8,153 7.59 113,246 8,108 7.16 104,125 8,261 7.93
Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks ............ 5,339 2,835 4,646
Premises and equipment, net ........ 3,671 1,880 1,760
Other assets ....................... 4,494 3,366 3,576
Less allowance for loan losses ..... (562) (1,567) (565)
-------- -------- --------
Total ......................... $120,425 $119,760 $113,542
======== ======== ========
Liabilities and shareholders' equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits ................... $ 19,851 602 3.03% $ 19,892 569 2.86% $ 22,622 620 2.74%
Savings deposits .................. 30,776 497 1.61 26,744 440 1.65 23,283 428 1.84
Time deposits ..................... 28,531 1,387 4.86 35,020 1,695 4.84 37,365 1,899 5.08
Other borrowed funds .............. 1,925 252 13.09 1,246 140 11.24 1,521 73 4.85
-------- ------- -------- ------ -------- ------
Total interest-
bearing liabilities ...... 81,083 2,738 3.38 82,902 2,844 3.43 84,791 3,020 3.56
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits ................... 27,567 24,019 19,740
Other ............................. 3,233 3,177 1,747
Shareholders' equity ............... 8,542 9,662 7,264
-------- -------- --------
Total ........................ $120,425 $119,760 $113,542
======== ======== ========
Net interest earnings .............. $5,415 $5,264 $5,241
Net yield on interest-earning assets 5.04% 4.65% 5.03%
For purposes of computing the average balance, loans are not reduced for
nonperforming loans.
17
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is an effective measure of how well management has
balanced the Bank's interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities. Net interest
income, the difference between (a) interest and fees on interest-earning assets
and (b) interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities, is a significant
component of the Bank's earnings. Changes in net interest income result
primarily from increases or decreases in the average balances of
interest-earning assets, the availability of particular sources of funds and
changes in prevailing interest rates.
Net interest income for 2000 totaled $5.4 million, an increase of $151,000
or 2.86%, compared to 1999. Net interest income in 1999 totaled $5.3 million, an
increase of $23,000, or 0.45%, compared to 1998.
Table 2--Rate-Volume Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income
2000 COMPARED TO 1999 1999 COMPARED TO 1998
------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
INCREASE (DECREASE) DUE TO INCREASE (DECREASE) DUE TO
------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
VOLUME RATE NET VOLUME RATE NET
------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest earned on:
Loans .................................. $(673) $(261) $(934) $(245) $(436) $(681)
Investment securities held-to-maturity . 646 3 649 569 (89) 480
Investment securities available-for-sale 605 67 672 37 18 55
Federal funds sold ..................... (450) 108 (342) 26 (33) (7)
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Total interest-earning assets ......... 128 (83) 45 387 (540) (153)
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Interest paid on:
Demand deposits ........................ (33) 66 33 (67) 16 (51)
Savings deposits ...................... 109 (52) 57 58 (46) 12
Time deposits .......................... (226) (82) (308) (120) (84) (204)
Other borrowed funds ................... 68 44 112 56 11 67
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Total interest-bearing liabilities .... (82) (24) (106) (73) (103) (176)
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Net interest income ................... $ 210 $ (59) $ 151 $ 460 $(437) $ 23
===== ===== ===== ===== ===== =====
Changes in interest income or expense not arising solely as a result of volume
or rate variances are allocated to rate variances due to the interest
sensitivity of consolidated assets and liabilities.
In 2000, there was an increase in net interest income of $210,000 due to
changes in volume but a decrease of $59,000 due to changes in rate. In 1999,
there was an increase in net interest income of $460,000 due to changes in
volume but a decrease of $437,000 due to changes in rate.
Average earning assets decreased from $113.2 million in 1999 to $107.5
million in 2000 and increased from $104.1 million in 1998 to $113.2 million in
1999. The 1999 growth in earning assets was primarily attributed to the
acquisition of $31.5 million in deposits from First Union Corporation in
September 1999. The acquired deposits primarily consisted of core noninterest
checking deposits and savings deposits. However, to meet capital requirements
mandated in its Written Agreement with regulators (Refer to Regulatory Matters
below) the Bank implemented an asset reduction/capital improvement plan in 2000
that included the reduction of non-First Union acquired deposits. Beginning in
June 2000, the Bank sold higher yielding certificates of deposit to other
financial institutions, encouraged some large deposit accountholders to remove
deposits, and consolidated three branches in its branch network.
The net interest margin of the Bank was 5.04% in 2000, 4.65% in 1999 and
5.03% in 1998. While the prime rate increased 75 basis points during 2000, the
Bank did not experience a similar increase in yield on its loan portfolio. This
is because much of the Bank's loan portfolio is fixed rate in nature and not
related to prime. In addition, during 2000, the average outstanding loan balance
declined from $68.5 million to $55.3 million. This decline was related to
significant paydowns/payoffs in the purchased automobile loan portfolio of the
Bank. Proceeds from these paydowns were used to fund the Bank's asset reduction
plan.
18
During 2000, the average federal funds yield was 6.15% compared to 4.95% in
1999 and 5.31% in 1998. During 2000, the average investment in federal funds
decreased by $8.2 million. Consistent with its asset reduction/capital
improvement plan, the Bank reduced the level of deposits in its "sweep" checking
account product which represent high balance short-term deposits. These deposits
were typically invested in Federal Funds Sold.
The yield on the investment portfolio increased 82 basis points to 6.76% in
2000 compared to 5.94% in 1999 and 6.57% in 1998. In September 1999 when the
Bank acquired $31.5 million in deposits from First Union, funds were placed in
investment securities to achieve a minimum yield of 7%, thereby, increasing the
average yield on the portfolio.
The cost of interest-bearing liabilities declined to 3.38% in 2000 compared
to 3.43% in 1999 and 3.56% in 1998. Consistent with market conditions, during
the last quarter of 1999 and the first quarter of 2000, the Bank reduced the
rates it pays on many of its interest-bearing products by as much as 25 basis
points. In addition, in June 2000, the Bank sold higher yielding certificates of
deposit to other financial institutions which resulted in a reduction in the
cost of funds.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision is based on management's estimate of the amount needed to
maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses. This estimate is based on the
review of the loan portfolio, the level of net credit losses, past loan loss
experience, the general economic outlook and other factors management feels are
appropriate.
The provision and allowance for loan losses charged against earnings in 2000
was $565,000 compared to $1,007,003 in 1999 and $350,500 in 1998. Significant
provisions were made for the year ended December 31, 1999 for one community
development loan and other loan policy changes which required increased
provisions. The community development loan was charged-off by June 30, 2000 with
the exception of approximately $114,000 related to off-balance sheet risk
associated with an outstanding letter of credit. This amount remains fully
reserved. In addition, in September 2000, the Bank made provisions for and
charged-off loans totaling $498,000. Approximately $267,000 of these loans were
guaranteed by the SBA. The Bank continues to work with the Small Business
Administration (SBA) to collect on the guarantees associated with these loans.
Management believes the level of the allowance for loan losses is adequate as of
December 31, 2000.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income increased $712,000 in 2000 compared to 1999 and increased
$410,000 in 1999 compared to 1998.
The amount of the Bank's noninterest income generally reflects the volume of
the transactional and other accounts handled by the Bank and includes such fees
and charges as low balance account charges, overdrafts, account analysis, and
other customer service fees. Customer service fees increased $587,000 in 2000
compared to 1999. This increase was primarily due to growth in fees on deposits
because of an increase in minimum balance requirements and other deposit-related
fee increases that went into effect on April 15, 2000. In addition, there is a
higher level of demand deposit accounts in 2000. A higher level of demand
deposit accounts result in more overdraft fees, activity service charges and low
balance fees. The Bank also increased its ATM surcharge fees for non-customers
from $1.50 to $1.75 in June 2000.
To achieve capital ratios as set forth in its Written Agreement with
regulatory agencies (Refer to Regulatory Matters below), in June 2000 the Bank
sold approximately $6.6 million in certificates of deposit to other financial
institutions to reduce its asset size. These transactions resulted in a gain of
$253,000. During 2000, the Bank sold approximately $20 million of its investment
portfolio to fund the reduction in asset size. The Bank recorded a loss of
$200,000 on these sales. In October 2000, the Bank sold one of the branch
facilities it acquired from First Union in 1999 for a gain of approximately
$329,000.
19
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense increased $1.1 million, or 14.1%, in 2000 to $8.8 million
compared to $7.7 million in 1999 and $6.7 million in 1998.
Salaries and benefits increased $113,000, or 3.8%, in 2000 compared to an
increase of $407,000, or 15.9%, in 1999. This increase is primarily attributable
to raises and additional employees related to the acquisition of
deposits/branches from First Union in September 1999. However, in May 2000, the
Bank began strategic reductions in staff and job consolidations to reduce the
level of personnel expense. The closure/consolidation of three branches in
September 2000 resulted in further reductions in this expense during the quarter
ended December 31, 2000.
Occupancy and equipment expense increased approximately $380,000, or 26.95%,
during 2000 compared to an increase of $162,000 or 12.7%, during 1999. The
increase during 2000 was primarily attributable to a lease the Bank entered into
in July 1999 to house its corporate headquarters including its executive offices
and other non-branch operating departments. The Bank leased 25,000 square feet
at an average cost of $14.14 per foot until September 2000. In accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 13, this lease was accounted
for as a capital lease in the amount of $1,483,000 as the present value of
future minimum lease payments exceeds 90% of the fair market value of the
building. In October 2000, the Bank purchased this facility for approximately
$1.4 million. This transaction is expected to save the Bank $1.6 million over
the remaining 9-year term of the lease it had in place and removes the capital
lease obligation.
In addition, in conjunction with its acquisition of deposits from First
Union, the Bank assumed the leases of four branches, two of which were in close
proximity to its existing branches. Due to more favorable characteristics of
these branches (i.e. visibility, drive-through, ATM's, etc.), the Bank relocated
its branch operations to the acquired facilities. These facilities have higher
rental rates. The Bank consolidated two of the acquired branches with its
existing branch network and closed its Frankford branch in September 2000. In
October 2000, the Bank sold one of the acquired facilities located in West
Philadelphia for a gain of approximately $329,000. The Bank's Frankford and West
Girard branches have been listed with realtors and are expected to be sold
during 2001.
Data processing expenses are a result of the management decision of the Bank
to outsource a majority of its data processing operations to third party
processors. Such expenses are reflective of the high level of accounts being
serviced for which the Bank is charged a per account charge by processors. In
addition, the Bank uses outside loan servicing companies to service its
mortgage, credit card, installment and student loan portfolios. Data processing
expenses increased by $108,000, or 12.6%, during 2000 compared to an decrease of
$5,000, or 0.6%, in 1999. This increase is primarily attributable to the First
Union acquisition related growth in average deposit levels for which the Bank
pays outside services to process transactions and provide statement rendering.
The Bank continues to study methods by which it may reduce its data processing
costs, including but not limited to a consolidation of servicers, in-house
processing versus outsourcing, and the renegotiation of existing contracts with
servicers.
Marketing and public relations expense decreased by $146,000, or 47.9%, in
2000 compared to an increase of $83,000, or 37.5%, in 1999. In June 2000,
management implemented an earnings enhancement plan that included a reduction in
all nonessential expenses including marketing. As the Bank was in an asset
reduction mode, there were no new business initiatives that required marketing.
Professional services increased $150,000 or 38.2%, in 2000. This increase was
primarily related to fees the Bank paid to attorneys to handle loan related
legal matters as well as to negotiate the elements of its Written Agreement with
Federal Regulators in February 2000
Office operations and supplies expense increased by $62,000, or 8.7%, in
2000. This increase was primarily a result of the acquisition of branches from
First Union in 1999 and the relocation of the corporate headquarters. However,
in September 2000, the Bank closed/consolidated branches which resulted in
reductions in branch operating costs (i.e. security guards, supplies, etc.)
during the quarter ending December 31, 2000.
20
Federal deposit insurance premiums were $169,000 in 2000 compared to $105,000
in 1999 and $82,000 in 1998. FDIC insurance premiums are applied to all
financial institutions based on a risk based premium assessment system. Under
this system, bank strength is based on three factors: 1) asset quality, 2)
capital strength, and 3) management. Premium assessments are then assigned based
on the institution's overall rating, with the stronger institutions paying lower
rates. The Bank's assessment was based on 1.96 basis points for BIF (Bank
Insurance Fund) assessable deposits and SAIF (Savings Insurance Fund) assessable
deposits. The increase during 2000, is a result of the perceived risk associated
with the Bank's weakening financial condition and declining capital base.
All other expenses are reflective of the general cost to do business and
compete in the current regulatory environment and maintenance of adequate
insurance coverage.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Sources and Uses of Funds
The Bank's financial condition can be evaluated in terms of trends in its
sources and uses of funds. The comparison of average balances in Table 3
indicates how the Bank has managed these elements. Average funding uses
decreased approximately $5.8 million, or 5.09%, in 2000 compared to $9.1
million, or 8.76%, in 1999.
Table 3--Sources and Use of Funds Trends
2000 1999 1998
--------------------------------- ---------------------------------- -------
INCREASE INCREASE
AVERAGE (DECREASE) AVERAGE (DECREASE) AVERAGE
BALANCE AMOUNT PERCENT BALANCE AMOUNT PERCENT BALANCE
------- ------ ------- ------- ------ ------- -------
(Dollars in thousands)
Funding uses:
Loans ................ $ 55,262 $(13,264) (19.36)% $ 68,526 $(2,812) (3.94)% $ 71,338
Investment securities
Held-to-maturity .... 28,659 6,967 32.12 21,692 10,256 89.68 11,436
Available-for-sale .. 18,044 8,769 94.54 9,275 883 10.52 8,392
Federal funds sold .. 5,518 (8,235) (59.88) 13,753 794 6.13 12,959
-------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Total uses ........ $107,483 $ (5,763) $113,246 $ 9,121 $104,125
======== ======== ======== ======= ========
Funding sources:
Demand deposits:
Noninterest-bearing . $ 27,567 $ 3,548 14.77% $ 24,019 $ 4,279 21.68% $ 19,740
Interest-bearing .... 19,851 (41) (0.21) 19,892 (2,730) (12.07) 22,622
Savings deposits ..... 30,776 4,032 15.08 26,744 3,461 14.86 23,283
Time deposits ........ 28,531 (6,489) (18.53) 35,020 (2,345) (6.28) 37,365
Other borrowed funds . 1,925 679 54.49 1,246 (275) (18.08) 1,521
-------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Total sources ..... $108,650 $ 1,729 $106,921 $ 2,390 $104,531
======== ======== ======== ======= ========
*Includes held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities
Investment Securities and Other Short-Term Investments
The Bank's investment portfolio is classified as either held-to-maturity or
available-for-sale. Investments classified as held-to-maturity are carried at
amortized cost and are those securities the Bank has both the intent and ability
to hold to maturity. Investments classified as available-for-sale are those
investments the Bank intends to hold for an indefinite amount of time, but not
necessarily to maturity, and are carried at fair value, with the unrealized
holding gains and losses reported as a component of shareholders' equity on the
balance sheet.
21
Average investment securities and federal funds sold, in the aggregate,
increased by $7.5 million, or 16.8%, in 2000 compared to an increase of $11.9
million, or 36.4%, in 1999. The increase in the average balances during 2000 is
a result of the acquisition of deposits from First Union in September 1999.
These deposits were acquired without corresponding loans and funds were
therefore placed in U.S. Government Agency and mortgage-backed securities to
maximize the yield. In addition, the Bank invested the funds from
paydowns/payoffs in the loan portfolios in similar securities. However, to fund
its asset reduction/capital improvement plan, the Bank sold investment
securities totaling approximately $20 million during the latter half of 2000.
The Bank's investment portfolio primarily consists of mortgage-backed
pass-through agency securities, U.S. Treasury securities, and other
government-sponsored agency securities. The Bank does not invest in high-risk
securities or complex structured notes.
As reflected in Table 4, the assumed average maturity of the investment
portfolio was 4.4 years at year-end 2000. Approximately 39.3% of the portfolio
consists of mortgage-backed pass-through securities that have longer-term
contractual maturities but are sometimes paid off/down before maturity or have
repricing characteristics that occur before final maturity. The Bank has
attempted to minimize the repayment risk (risk of very fast or very slow
repayment) associated with these types of securities by investing primarily in a
number of seasoned mortgage pools for which there is a repayment history. This
history better enables the Bank to project the repayment speeds of these pools.
In addition, the Bank has minimized the interest rate risk associated with these
mortgage-backed securities by investing in a variety of pools, many of which
have variable rates with indices that track closely with the current interest
rate environment.
In a declining rate environment, the duration of the investment portfolio is
significantly shortened because of the high level of callable government agency
securities - approximately 60.7% at December 31, 2000. These higher yielding
securities are likely to be called as rates trend downward. The result is
additional liquidity and a reduction in yield on the portfolio. The Bank is
taking steps to combat the impact of the high level of optionality in the
portfolio by identifying replacement loans or securities that are fixed rate or
perform well when "shock" tested in a declining rate environments.
Table 4--Analysis of Investment Securities
WITHIN AFTER ONE BUT AFTER FIVE BUT AFTER
ONE YEAR WITHIN FIVE YEARS WITHIN TEN YEARS TEN YEARS
------------------ ------------------ ----------------- ----------------
AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD TOTAL
------ ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- -----
(Dollars in thousands)
Other government securities $ -- --% $ 12,427 6.26% $ 8,336 6.96% $ -- -- $ 20,763
Mutual funds 100 6.40 -- -- -- -- -- -- 100
Other investments -- -- -- 406 6.00 -- -- 406
Mortgage-backed securities -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,745
------- -------- ------- ------ --------
Total securities $ 100 $ 12,427 $ 8,742 $ -- $ 35,014
======= ======== ======= ====== ========
Average maturity 4.4 years
The above table sets forth the maturities of investment securities at December
31, 2000 and the weighted average yields of such securities (calculated on the
basis of the cost and effective yields weighted for the scheduled maturity of
each security).
Loans
Average loans decreased approximately $13.3 million, or 19.4%, in 2000
compared to a decrease of $2.8 million, or 3.94%, in 1999. Although the Bank
purchased a $22 million portfolio of seasoned automobile loans from NationsBank
in February 1999, close to 80% of this portfolio had paid down by year-end of
2000. Paydowns in this portfolio are averaging $500,000 per month. In June 2000,
the Bank sold approximately $2.1 million in student loans as part of its ongoing
strategy to originate and sell these loans to generate gains and minimize its
data processing costs. The Bank's mortgage loan portfolio continues to decline
because of payoffs/paydowns for which there were no new originations to replace.
Further, in September 2000, the Bank charged-off commercial and consumer
loans totaling $498,000. Collection of these loans will be pursued through
alternative means. These charge-offs were in-line with the Bank's strategy to
clear its loan portfolio of any loans for which payment is unlikely.
22
Over-riding all of these factors is that during 2000 the Bank was in an asset
reduction/capital improvement mode and a re-organization was underway. As a
result, new business was not actively sought. Management believes it is now
positioned to expand its business development efforts in the Philadelphia region
and has developed strategic plans to incorporate these initiatives.
Table 5--Loans Outstanding, Net of Unearned Income
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial...... $11,429 $13,664 $13,643 $12,095 $10,107
Commercial real estate ........ 652 1,288 1,518 1,515 649
Residential mortgages ......... 22,316 26,237 31,365 35,962 36,622
Consumer loans ................ 10,908 19,822 11,424 22,611 17,340
Loans held-for-sale ........... -- -- -- 1,979 4,906
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total loans ................ $45,305 $61,011 $57,950 $74,162 $69,624
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Table 6--Loan Maturities and Interest Sensitivity
WITHIN AFTER ONE BUT AFTER
ONE YEAR WITHIN FIVE YEARS TEN YEARS TOTAL
-------- ----------------- --------- -----
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial .............. $ 4,407 $ 4,030 $ 2,992 $11,429
Commercial real estate ................. 114 -- 538 652
Residential mortgages .................. -- -- 22,316 22,316
Consumer loans ......................... 821 7,299 2,788 10,908
------- ------- ------- -------
Total loans ........................ 5,342 11,329 28,634 45,305
Loans maturing after one year with:
Fixed interest rates ................ $34,892
Variable interest rates ............. 10,414
Nonperforming Loans
Table 7 reflects the Bank's nonperforming loans for the last five years. The
Bank generally determines a loan to be "nonperforming" when interest or
principal is past due 90 days or more. If it otherwise appears doubtful that the
loan will be repaid, management may consider the loan to be nonperforming before
the lapse of 90 days. The Bank's policy is to charge off unsecured loans after
90 days past due. Interest on nonperforming loans ceases to accrue except for
loans that are well collateralized and in the process of collection. When a loan
is placed on nonaccrual, previously accrued and unpaid interest is generally
reversed out of income unless adequate collateral from which to collect the
principal of, and interest on, the loan appears to be available.
Table 7--Nonperforming Loans
(Dollars in thousands) 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Nonaccrual loans ........................ $453 $2,027 $1,720 $1,179 $800
Interest income included in net income
for the year ......................... 20 67 37 14 6
Interest income that would have been
recorded under original terms ........ 28 113 189 112 45
Loans past due 90 days and still accruing 34 53 125 306 408
There is no known information about possible credit problems other than those
classified as nonaccrual that causes management to be uncertain as to the
ability of any borrower to comply with present loan terms.
23
The Bank grants commercial, residential, and consumer loans to customers
primarily located in Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania and surrounding counties
in the Delaware Valley. Although the Bank has a diversified loan portfolio, its
debtors' ability to honor their contracts is influenced by the region's economy.
At December 31, 2000, approximately 38% of the commercial loan portfolio of
the Bank was concentrated in loans made to religious organizations. From
inception, the Bank has received support in the form of investments and deposits
and has developed strong relationships with the Philadelphia region's religious
community. Loans made to these organizations were primarily for expansion and
repair of church facilities. At December 31, 2000, none of these loans were
nonperforming.
During 2000, nonaccrual loans decreased to $453,000, down from $2 million at
December 31, 1999. This decrease is primarily attributable to the charge-off of
one community development construction loan that accounted for approximately
$600,000 of the total nonaccrual loans in 1999. In addition, during 2000, the
Bank cleared its portfolio by aggressively charging-off other loans for which
collectibility was uncertain. At December 31, 2000, approximately $94,000 of the
total nonaccrual loans was residential mortgages. The underlying real estate
collateral associated with these loans minimizes the risk of loss.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses reflects management's continuing evaluation of
the loan portfolio, assessment of economic conditions, the diversification and
size of the portfolio, adequacy of collateral, past and anticipated loss
experience, and the amount and quality of nonperforming loans. Table 8 presents
the allocation of loan losses by major category for the past five years. The
specific allocations in any particular category may prove to be excessive or
inadequate and consequently may be reallocated in the future to reflect then
current conditions.
Table 8--Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses
2000 1999 1998 1997
------------------------ ---------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------
PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT
OF LOANS OF LOANS OF LOANS OF LOANS
IN EACH IN EACH IN EACH IN EACH
CATEGORY TO CATEGORY TO CATEGORY TO CATEGORY TO
AMOUNT TOTAL LOANS AMOUNT TOTAL LOANS AMOUNT TOTAL LOANS AMOUNT TOTAL LOANS
------ ----------- ------ ----------- ------ ----------- ------ -----------
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial $383 25.23% $ 263 22.40% $272 23.55% $144 16.31%
Commercial real estate .. 11 1.44 877 2.11 132 2.62 13 2.04
Residential mortgages ... 102 24.08 144 43.00 55 59.12 180 48.49
Consumer loans .......... 66 49.26 283 32.49 188 19.71 97 33.16
Unallocated ............. -- -- -- -- 32 -- 34 --
---- ------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ---- ------
$562 100.00% $1,567 100.00% $679 100.00% $468 100.00%
==== ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. While
management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future
additions may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition,
various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process,
periodically review the Bank's allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may
require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance based on their
judgments of information available to them at the time of the examination.
24
Table 9--Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at January 1 $1,567 $ 679 $ 468 $ 528 $ 476
------ ------- ------- ------- -------
Charge-offs:
Commercial and industrial (321) (25) -- (66) (17)
Commercial real estate (803) -- -- -- --
Residential mortgages (47) -- (9) --
Consumer loans (597) (315) (180) (160) (25)
------ ------- ------- ------- -------
(1,721) (387) (180) (235) (42)
------ ------- ------- ------- -------
Recoveries - consumer loans 151 268 41 78 9
------ ------- ------- ------- -------
Net charge-offs (1,570) (119) (139) (157) (33)
Provisions charged to operations 565 1,007 350 97 85
------ ------- ------- ------- -------
Balance at December 31 $ 562 $ 1,567 $ 679 $ 468 $ 528
====== ======= ======= ======= =======
Ratio of net charge-offs to average
loans outstanding 2.84% 0.17% 0.19% 0.23% 0.05%
The amount charged to operations and the related balance in the allowance for
loan losses are based upon the periodic evaluations of the loan portfolio by
management. These evaluations consider several factors, including, but not
limited to, general economic conditions, loan portfolio composition, prior loan
loss experience, and management's estimate of future potential losses.
During 2000, the Bank charged-off approximately $1.6 million of its
classified loans. Approximately $600,000 of the total charge-offs related to one
community development loan that had been fully reserved at December 31, 1999. In
addition, the Bank charged-off loans totaling $498,000 of which approximately
$267,000 of these loans were guaranteed by the Small Business Administration
(SBA). The Bank will perform post charge-off collections to maximize its
recovery on all charged-off loans. Workout attorneys have been engaged to
aggressively pursue collections of these loans.
Deposits
Average deposits grew approximately $1.05 million, or 1.0%, in 2000 compared
to growth of $2.7 million, or 2.6%, in 1999. The increase is primarily related
to the acquisition of $31.5 million in deposits from First Union Corporation in
September 1999. These deposits included primarily core deposits consisting of
checking and savings accounts. However, to meet capital requirements mandated in
its Written Agreement with regulators (Refer to Regulatory Matters below) the
Bank implemented an asset reduction/capital improvement plan in 2000 that
included the reduction of non-First Union acquired deposits. Beginning in June
2000, the Bank sold higher yielding certificates of deposit to other financial
institutions and encouraged some large deposit accountholders to remove deposits
to fund its asset reduction plan. In addition, the Bank's September 2000 branch
consolidation resulted in some deposit attrition.
Table 10--Average Deposits by Class and Rate
2000 1999 1998
---------------------- ---------------------- --------------------
AMOUNT RATE AMOUNT RATE AMOUNT RATE
------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ----
(Dollars in thousands)
Noninterest-bearing
demand deposits $27,567 --% $24,019 --% $19,740 --%
Interest-bearing demand
deposits 19,851 3.03 19,892 2.86 22,622 2.74
Savings deposits 30,776 1.61 26,744 1.65 23,283 1.84
Time deposits 28,531 4.86 35,020 4.84 37,365 5.08
25
Other Borrowed Funds
The average balance for other borrowed funds increased $679,000, or 54.5%, in
2000 compared to a decrease of $275,000, or 18.08%, in 1999. This increase was a
result of the need to borrow funds either by utilizing a fully secured Federal
Funds line of credit with a correspondent bank or using a Master Repurchase
Agreement with another financial institution. These borrowings were necessary to
temporarily fund the Bank's asset reduction/capital improvement plan until other
assets were sold. This increase was offset by the reversal of the $1.5 million
capital lease obligation related to the Bank's purchase of a previously leased
building for its corporate offices. Generally, the level of other borrowed funds
is dependent on many items such as loan growth, deposit growth, customer
collateral/security requirements and interest rates paid for these funds.
Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity Management
The primary functions of asset/liability management are to assure adequate
liquidity and maintain appropriate balance between interest-sensitive earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Liquidity management involves the
ability to meet cash flow requirements of customers who may be either depositors
wanting to withdraw funds or borrowers needing assurance that sufficient funds
will be available to meet their credit needs. Interest rate sensitivity
management seeks to avoid fluctuating net interest margins and enhance
consistent growth of net interest income through periods of changing interest
rates.
The Bank is required to maintain minimum levels of liquid assets as defined
by Federal Reserve Board (FRB) regulations. This requirement is evaluated in
relation to the composition and stability of deposits; the degree and trend of
reliance on short-term, volatile sources of funds, including any undue reliance
on particular segments of the money market or brokered deposits; any difficulty
in obtaining funds; and the liquidity provided by securities and other assets.
In addition, consideration is given to the nature, volume and anticipated use of
commitments; the adequacy of liquidity and funding policies and practices,
including the provision for alternate sources of funds; and the nature and trend
of off-balance-sheet activities. As of December 31, 2000, management believes
the Bank's liquidity is satisfactory and in compliance with FRB regulations
The Bank's principal sources of asset liquidity include investment securities
consisting primarily of U.S. Government and agency issues, particularly those of
shorter maturities, and mortgage-backed securities with monthly repayments of
principal and interest. There are no securities maturing in one year or less.
However, other types of assets such as federal funds sold, as well as maturing
loans, are sources of liquidity. Approximately $5.3 million in loans are
scheduled to mature within one year.
The Bank's overall liquidity has been enhanced by a significant level of core
deposits which management has determined are less sensitive to interest rate
movements. The Bank has avoided reliance on large-denomination time deposits as
well as brokered deposits. Table 11 provides a breakdown of the maturity of time
deposits of $100,000 or more.
Table 11--Maturity of Time Deposits of $100,000 or More
(Dollars in thousands)
3 months or less ............... $6,212
Over 3 through 6 months ........ 1,356
Over 6 months through 1 year.... 1,255
Over 1 through five years ...... 240
Over five years ................ --
------
Total .......................... $9,063
======
26
Interest rate sensitivity varies with different types of interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Overnight federal funds on which rates
change daily and loans that are tied to prime or other short-term indices differ
considerably from long-term investment securities and fixed-rate loans.
Similarly, time deposits are much more interest-sensitive than passbook savings
accounts. The shorter-term interest rate sensitivities are key to measuring the
interest sensitivity gap or excess interest-earning assets over interest-bearing
liabilities. Management of interest sensitivity involves matching repricing
dates of interest-earning assets with interest-bearing liabilities in a manner
designed to optimize net interest income within the limits imposed by regulatory
authorities, liquidity determinations and capital considerations. Table 12 sets
forth the earliest repricing distribution of the Bank's interest-earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities at December 31, 2000, the Bank's interest rate
sensitivity gap ratio (i.e., excess of interest rate-sensitive assets over
interest rate-sensitive liabilities, divided by total assets) and the Bank's
cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap ratio. For purposes of the table,
except for savings deposits, an asset or liability is considered rate-sensitive
within a specified period when it matures or could be repriced within such
period in accordance with its contractual terms. At December 31, 2000, a slight
liability sensitive position is maintained on a cumulative basis through one
year of 0.68%. This level is within the Bank's policy guidelines of +/-15% on a
cumulative one-year basis. The current gap position is relatively evenly matched
as a result of the number of loans either repricing or maturing in 12 months
closely matching certificate of deposit maturities. Interest rate risk is
minimized by the Bank's high level of core deposits that have been placed in
longer repricing intervals. Generally, because of the Bank's negative gap
position in shorter time frames, the Bank can anticipate that decreases in
market rates will have a positive impact on the net interest income, while
increases will have the opposite effect.
For purposes of the gap analysis, such deposits (savings, MMA, NOW) which do
not have definitive maturity dates and do not readily react to changes in
interest rates have been placed in longer repricing intervals versus immediate
repricing time frames, making the analysis more reflective of the Bank's
historical experience.
Table 12--Interest Sensitivity Analysis
INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY GAPS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OVER
OVER 1 YEAR OVER
3 MONTHS 3 THROUGH THROUGH 3 THROUGH OVER FIVE
OR LESS 12 MONTHS 3 YEARS 5 YEARS YEARS CUMULATIVE
------- ------ ------- ------- ----- ----------
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-sensitive assets:
Interest-bearing deposits with banks ...... $ 245 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 245
Investment securities ..................... 6,751 1,206 6,332 7,243 13,482 35,014
Federal funds sold ........................ 720 -- -- -- -- 720
Loans .................................... 9,949 7,409 8,655 3,839 14,891 44,743
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total interest-sensitive assets .... 17,665 8,615 14,987 11,082 28,373 $ 80,722
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ========
Cumulative totals .................. 17,665 26,280 41,267 52,349 80,722
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Interest-sensitive liabilities:
Interest checking accounts ................ 4,783 -- 11,160 -- -- $ 15,943
Savings accounts .......................... 2,536 -- 22,820 -- -- 25,356
Certificates less than $100,000 ........... 4,276 6,412 1,235 567 -- 12,490
Certificates of $100,000 or more .......... 6,212 2,611 240 -- -- 9,063
Other borrowed funds ...................... -- -- -- -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total interest-sensitive liabilities $ 17,807 $ 9,023 $ 35,455 $ 567 $ -- $ 62,852
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Cumulative totals .................. $ 17,807 $ 26,830 $ 62,285 $ 62,852 $ 62,852
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Interest sensitivity gap ................... $ (142) $ (408) $(20,468) $ 10,515 $ 28,373
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Cumulative gap ............................. (142) (550) (21,018) (10,503) 17,870
Cumulative gap/total earning assets ........ (0.18)% (0.68)% (26.04)% (13.01)% 22.14%
Interest-sensitive assets to
interest-sensitive liabilities ........... 99.20% 95.48% 42.27% 1,954.50% -- %
Core deposits such as checking and savings deposits have been placed in
repricing intervals based on historical trends and management's estimates.
27
While using the interest sensitivity gap analysis is a useful management tool
as it considers the quantity of assets and liabilities subject to repricing in a
given time period, it does not consider the relative sensitivity to market
interest rate changes that are characteristic of various interest rate-sensitive
assets and liabilities. Consequently, even though the Bank currently has a
positive gap position because of unequal sensitivity of these assets and
liabilities, management believes this position will not materially impact
earnings in a changing rate environment. For example, changes in the prime rate
on variable commercial loans may not result in an equal change in the rate of
money market deposits or short-term certificates of deposit. A simulation model
is therefore used to estimate the impact of various changes, both upward and
downward, in market interest rates and volumes of assets and liabilities on the
net income of the Bank. The calculated estimates of net income or "earnings" at
risk at December 31, 2000 are as follows:
Net interest Percent of
Changes in rate income change
--------------- ------ ------
(Dollars in thousands)
+200 basis points $ 4,302 (1.40)%
+100 basis points 4,563 (3.00)
Flat rate 4,713 --
-100 basis points 4,648 (3.20)
-200 basis points 4,574 (8.70)
A simulation model is also used to estimate the impact of various changes,
both upward and downward, in market interest rates and volumes of assets and
liabilities on the economic value of the Bank. This model produces an interest
rate exposure report that measures the long-term rate risks in the balance sheet
by valuing the Bank's assets and liabilities at market. It simulates what amount
would be left over if the Bank liquidated its assets and liabilities. This is
otherwise known as "economic value" of the capital of the Bank. The calculated
estimates of economic value at risk at December 31, 2000 are as follows:
Percent of
Changes in rate Net equity change
--------------- ---------- ------
(Dollars in thousands)
+200 basis points $ 10,566 (14.40)%
+100 basis points 11,742 (4.90)
Flat rate 12,349 --
-100 basis points 12,638 2.30
-200 basis points 12,559 1.70
The assumptions used in evaluating the vulnerability of the Company's
earnings and equity to changes in interest rates are based on management's
consideration of past experience, current position and anticipated future
economic conditions. The interest sensitivity of the Company's assets and
liabilities, as well as the estimated effect of changes in interest rates on the
earnings and equity, could vary substantially if different assumptions are used
or actual experience differs from the assumptions on which the calculations were
based.
The Bank's Board of Directors and management consider all of the relevant
factors and conditions in the asset/liability planning process. Interest rate
exposure is not significant and is within the policy limits of the Bank at
December 31, 2000. However, if significant interest rate risk arises, the Board
of Directors and management may take, but are not limited to, one or all of the
following steps to reposition the balance sheet as appropriate:
1. Limit jumbo certificates of deposit and movement into money market
deposit accounts and short-term certificates of deposit through
pricing and other marketing strategies.
2. Purchase quality loan participations with appropriate interest
rate/gap match for the Bank's balance sheet.
3. Restructure the Bank's investment portfolio.
28
The Board of Directors has determined that active supervision of the interest
rate spread between yield on earning assets and cost of funds will decrease the
Bank's vulnerability to interest rate cycles.
Capital Resources
Total shareholders' equity increased $322,000 in 2000 compared to an increase
of approximately $123,000 in 1999. The increase in 2000 is a result of the
proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $848,000 in a limited offering to
the Company's Board of Directors, offset by the net loss of $755,000 which
resulted in an increase in the accumulated deficit.
The FRB standards for measuring capital adequacy for U.S. Banking
organizations require that banks maintain capital based on "risk-adjusted"
assets so that categories of assets with potentially higher risk will require
more capital backing than assets with lower risk. In addition, banks are
required to maintain capital to support, on a risk-adjusted basis, certain
off-balance-sheet activities such as loan commitments. The FRB standards
classify capital into two tiers, referred to as Tier I and Tier II. Tier I
consists of common shareholders' equity, noncumulative and cumulative perpetual
preferred stock, and minority interests less goodwill and/or intangible assets).
Tier II capital consists of allowance for loan losses, hybrid capital
instruments, term subordinated debt, and intermediate-term preferred stock.
Banks are required to meet a minimum ratio of 8% of qualifying capital to
risk-adjusted total assets with at least 4% Tier I capital and a Tier I leverage
ratio of at least 6%. Capital that qualifies as Tier II capital is limited to
100% of Tier I capital.
As indicated in Table 13, the Company's risk-based capital ratios are above
the minimum requirements. Management continues the objective of raising
additional capital by offering additional stock (preferred and common) for sale
in a private offering as well as increasing the rate of internal capital growth
as a means of maintaining the required capital ratios. However, the Bank's
growth, continued losses and the additional provisions to the allowance for
loans losses may have an adverse effect on its capital ratios. The Company and
the Bank do not anticipate paying dividends in the near future.
Table 13--Capital Ratios
(Dollars in thousands) 2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
Total Capital .................. $ 9,317 $ 9,223 $ 8,823
Less:
Intangible Assets ........... (2,298) (2,429) --
-------- -------- --------
Tier I capital ................. 7,019 6,794 8,823
Tier II capital ................ 537 770 679
-------- -------- --------
Total qualifying capital ....... $ 7,556 $ 7,564 $ 9,502
======== ======== ========
Risk-adjusted total assets
(including off-balance-sheet
exposures) .................. $ 42,949 $ 60,795 $ 54,373
======== ======== ========
Tier I risk-based capital ratio 16.34% 11.18% 16.23%
Total (Tier I and II) risk-based
capital ratio ................ 17.59% 12.44% 17.48%
Tier I leverage ratio .......... 7.39% 5.08% 7.67%
Regulatory Matters
In February 2000, as a result of a regulatory examination completed in
December 1999, the Bank entered into a Written Agreement (Agreement) with its
primary regulators with regard to, among other things, achievement of
agreed-upon capital levels, implementation of a viable earnings/strategic plan,
adequate funding of the allowance for loan losses, the completion of a
management review and succession plan, and improvement in internal controls. The
Agreement requires the Bank to increase its capital ratio to 6.5% by June 30,
2000 and to 7% at all times thereafter. As of December 31, 2000, the Bank had
met the required ratios by implementing strategies that included: increasing
profitability, consolidating branches, and soliciting new and additional sources
of capital. Management continues to address all matters outlined in the
Agreement. Its most recent notification from its regulators dated January 13,
2001, indicates that it is "partially" in compliance with the Agreement's terms
and conditions. Failure to comply could result in additional regulatory
supervision and/or actions.
29
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 1998, SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities" was issued, in June 1999 by SFAS No. 137, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Deferral of the Effective Date
of FASB Statement No. 133," and in June, 2000, by SFAS No. 138, "Accounting for
Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities," (collectively
SFAS No. 133). SFAS No. 133 requires that entities recognize all derivatives as
either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial condition and measure
those instruments at fair value. Under SFAS No. 133 an entity may designate a
derivative as a hedge of exposure to either changes in: (a) fair value of a
recognized assets or liability or firm commitment, (b) cash flows of a
recognized or forecasted transaction, or (c) foreign currencies of a net
investment in foreign operations, firm commitments, available-for-sale
securities or a forecasted transaction. Depending upon the effectiveness of the
hedge and/or the transaction being hedged, any changes in the fair value of the
derivative instrument is either recognized in earnings in the current year,
deferred to future periods, or recognized as hedge accounting. SFAS No. 133 is
required for all fiscal quarters or fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000.
On April 1, 2000, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133. Concurrent with the
adoption, the Company reclassified approximately $6.1 million of investment
securities from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale. Subsequent to the
reclassification, the Company transferred approximately $9.5 million of
investment securities from available-for-sale to trading. In June 2000, the
Company recorded a loss on the sale of these securities of $127,000. The Company
does not have any derivative instruments at December 31, 2000. Based upon the
Company not using derivatives at the current time, management does not
anticipate the adoption of SFAS No. 133 will have any continuing impact on
earnings or the financial position of the Company.
ITEM 8 -- FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
See Consolidated Financial Statements attached hereto as Exhibits.
ITEM 9 -- CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART III
ITEM 10 -- DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
(a) Directors of the Registrant and Bank
------------------------------------
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION AND YEAR FIRST TERM
NAME AGE OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS BECAME DIRECTOR WILL EXPIRE
- ---- --- ------------------- --------------- -----------
James F. Bodine 79 Retired as Managing Partne 1993 2002
Urban Affairs Partnership
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
S. Amos Brackeen 82 Founder and Pastor, 1993 2003
Philippian Baptist Church of
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Kemel G. Dawkins 77 President, Kemrodco 1993 2001
Development and
Construction Company, Inc.,
President, Kem-Her
Construction Company Inc.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
30
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION AND YEAR FIRST TERM
NAME AGE OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS BECAME DIRECTOR WILL EXPIRE
- ---- --- ------------------- --------------- -----------
L. Armstead Edwards 58 Treasurer, 1993 2004
United Bancshares, Inc.
Owner and President,
P.A.Z., Inc.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Marionette Y. Frazier 56 Partner, 1996 2004
John Frazier, Inc.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
William C. Green 76 Co-founder, Ivy Leaf 1993 2002
Middle School
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Angela M. Huggins 61 President and CEO 1993 2001
RMS Technologies
Inc. Foundation
William B. Moore 58 Secretary, 1993 2003
United Bancshares, Inc.
Pastor, Tenth Memorial
Baptist Church
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Evelyn F. Smalls 55 President and CEO of Registrant 2000 2002
and United Bank of Philadelphia
Ernest L. Wright 72 Founder, President and 1993 2004
CEO of Ernest L. Wright
Construction Company
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
(b) Executive Officers of Registrant and Bank
-----------------------------------------
Name Age Office
- ---- --- ------
Evelyn F. Smalls 55 President and Chief Executive Officer
Brenda M. Hudson-Nelson 39 Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
James F. Bodine 79 Co-Chairman, Board of Directors
L. Armstead Edwards 58 Co-Chairman, Board of Directors
William B. Moore 58 Secretary
Marionette Y. Frazier 56 Assistant Secretary
Angela M. Huggins 61 Treasurer
31
(c) Family Relationships.
--------------------
There are no family relationships between any director, executive officer or
person nominated or chosen by the Bank to become a director or executive
officer.
(d) Other
-----
There have been no events under any bankruptcy act, no criminal proceedings
and no judgments or injunctions material to the evaluation of the ability and
integrity of any director or executive officer during the past five years.
ITEM 11 -- EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION TABLE
NAME OF
INDIVIDUAL OR
NUMBER CAPACITIES IN
IN GROUP WHICH SERVED
- -------- ------------
2000 SALARY 2000 BONUS 2000 OPTIONS SERP
----------- ---------- ------------ ----
Evelyn F. Smalls President $118,921 $ -- $ -- $ --
Chief Executive Officer
Brenda M. Hudson-Nelson Senior Vice President $ 96,445 $ -- $ -- $ --
Chief Financial Officer
In June 2000, the Bank entered two-year employment agreements with its chief
executive officer and its chief financial officer covering such items as
salaries, bonuses and benefits. The agreements expire in 2002 and provide for
guaranteed minimum annual compensation of $141,000 and $101,000, respectively,
over the term of the contracts. The Bank made no stock-based compensation awards
to any employee during 2000.
Report of Compensation Committee on the Named
Executive Officers' Annual Compensation
------------------------------------------------------
The Executive Committee of the Bank's Board of Directors acts as the Bank's
Board of Directors Compensation Committee (the "Bank Compensation Committee")
which is composed entirely of independent outside directors. The Bank
Compensation Committee is responsible for setting and administering the Bank's
compensation policies, including those which govern salary and the bonus program
applicable to the Bank's named executive officers Ms. Smalls and Ms.
Hudson-Nelson (hereinafter some times referred to as "Named Executive
Officers").
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
Executive Compensation Policy Principles
The Bank's Compensation policy is also designed to (i) retain and attract
qualified key executives essential to the long-term success of the Bank and UBS;
(ii) reward such executives for consistent successful management of the Bank and
enhancement of shareholder value; and (iii) create a performance-oriented
environment that rewards performance not only with respect to the Bank's goals
but also the Bank's performance in relation to comparable industry performance
levels.
The Bank's Compensation Committee annually considers the Bank's economic
performance in terms of its asset diversification and quality, expense levels,
net income, capital accumulation and retention, return on equity and other
relevant criteria used in the financial services industry and seeks to relate
those considerations to the Bank's performance and each executive's performance
of her/his duties.
The Bank's executive compensation program, established by the Bank
Compensation Committee, is based on the belief that each executive officer's
compensation should bear a relationship to the business success of the Bank and
thus UBS, the value of the UBS's stock and any significant accomplishments by
the executive officer.
32
Elements of Executive Compensation Program
The Bank's total compensation program for its executive officers currently
consists of base salary, a fringe benefit package, and an opportunity, depending
on the Bank's annual earnings and other economic criteria, to obtain a cash
bonus and options to purchase UBS stock at the market price or a premium above
the market price determined by the Compensation Committee when such options are
awarded.
Salary Compensation and Fringe Benefits
The salary compensation is competitive in the light of the Bank's past
performance and present position in relationship to the other similar size banks
in the Delaware Valley and is combined with a fringe benefit package available
to the executive officers and other employees designed to retain and attract
experienced banking personnel. Each officer's salary is reviewed annually based
on that person's level of management responsibility at the Bank and performance
of duties.
No Bonus Awards
The Bank's officers, including the Named Executive Officers, have an
opportunity to be awarded a cash bonus based in large measure on the economic
performance of the Bank on an annual basis and each individual officer's
accomplishment of her/his designated responsibilities and goals. No bonuses were
paid to the Named Executive Officers, because of the Bank's negative earnings
performance in the year 2000 and the reduction which occurred in the Bank's
capital. Nevertheless, the Bank Compensation Committee particularly noted that
the Named Executive Officers were only recently named to their positions and
have made great strides to implementing compliance with the terms of the Written
Agreement with the Bank's regulators and guiding the Bank to a return to
profitable operations.
Executive Compensation Decisions for 2000
The Bank Compensation Committee evaluated the Bank's business performance for
the year 2000 and determined, based on such performance and the criteria
outlined above, determined that salary increases provide in the employment
agreements of the named executive officers were merited.
Based on the Bank's 2000 business performance, the Compensation Committee
determined that neither bonuses nor stock options should be granted to the Named
Executive Officers or other key officers at this time.
Factors and Criteria on which President's Compensation Was Based in 2000
The Bank Compensation Committee meets annually, without President Smalls
being present, to evaluate her business performance and review her compensation
package. The Bank Compensation Committee reports on that evaluation to the
independent directors of the Board.
Ms. Smalls is eligible to participate in all executive compensation
programs available to all other executives.
As indicated in the foregoing discussion concerning the principles upon which
the Bank's compensation policy is based, the Bank's economic performance and the
performance by Ms. Smalls of her duties as President are the essential elements
upon which the 2000 compensation was based. Also considered by the Bank
Compensation Committee was significant change in the Bank's management and the
progress that the Bank has made in recent months to develop fundamental
profitable operations.
In establishing Ms. Smalls' 2000 annual compensation, the primary economic
performance criteria which the Bank Compensation Committee considered were the
Bank's annual earnings, and the adequacy of the Bank's regulatory capital
ratios. The Committee also considered that the Bank reduced its problem loans
and nonperforming assets and successfully managed its overhead expense and
staff.
33
In accordance with the criteria described above, the Bank Compensation
Committee determined that, based on the Bank's earnings performance and its
other accomplishments in 2000, Ms. Smalls earned the salary specified in her
employment agreement.
The Compensation Committee
The Bank's Compensation Committees is composed of the following members:
James F. Bodine, L. Armstead Edwards, William B. Moore, Marionette Y. Frazier,
and Angela M. Huggins who endorse this report.
Respectfully submitted:
James F. Bodine, Co-chairman
L. Armstead Edwards, Co-chairman
Directors of the Bank are compensated for each meeting attended in the
amount of three hundred dollars fifty ($350) per Board meeting attended and one
hundred fifty dollars ($150) for each committee meeting attended. Directors who
are also salaried officers of the Bank receive no remuneration for their
services as Directors. During the year ended December 31, 2000, the Bank paid
Directors' fees to its "non-interested" Directors totaling $47,250. UBS has paid
no director fees since its inception.
One hundred thousand shares of the Bank's Common Stock are subject to a Long
Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Plan") under which options to purchase
the Bank's Common Stock may be granted to key employees of a price not less than
the fair market value thereof at the date of the grant ("Options"), and Common
Stock may be awarded as Restricted Stock, subject for a period of time to
substantial risk of forfeiture and restrictions on disposition as determined by
the Compensation Committee as of the date of the grant ("Restricted Stock").
Pursuant to the Plan, options are granted in tandem with Stock Appreciation
Rights ("SARs") allowing the holder of an Option to surrender the Option and
receive an amount equal to the appreciation in market value of a fixed number of
shares of Common Stock from the date of the grant of the Option. SARs may be
payable in Common Stock or cash or a combination of both. The Plan also allows
the Compensation Committee to grant Performance Shares, which are contingent
rights to receive, when certain performance criteria have been attained, amounts
of Common Stock and cash determined by the Compensation Committee for such an
award. Such rights are subject to forfeiture or reduction if performance goals
specified are not met during the performance period. No such options, restricted
stock or SARs were granted for 2000 performance.
No deferred compensation, incentive compensation or any further compensation
pursuant to any plan has been paid by the Bank, or will be paid by the Bank
based on services rendered to the Bank to the date of this filing.
At its annual meeting held May 6, 1994, the shareholders of the Registrant
approved the establishment of an Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP"). The
ESOP has not been formally activated by the Registrant. No purchases have been
made pursuant to the ESOP.
ITEM 12 -- SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
SHAREHOLDERS OWNING IN EXCESS OF FIVE PERCENT OF REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK
PERCENTAGE OF
NAME AND ADDRESSES AMOUNT AND NATURE OF OUTSTANDING
OF SHAREHOLDERS BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP COMMON STOCK OWNED
- ------------------ ---------------------- -------------------
First Union Corporation 241,666 21.98% (50,000 or 4.54%
Broad and Chestnut Streets are voting shares)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101
Philadelphia Municipal 71,667 6.52%
Retirement System
2000 Two Penn Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102
34
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE BANK AND
UBS SHARES OF REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK
AMOUNT PERCENTAGE OF
NAME BENEFICIALLY OWNED OUTSTANDING SHARES
- ---- ------------------ ------------------
James F. Bodine 44,333 4.030%
S. Amos Brackeen 5,000 0.450
Kemel G. Dawkins 20,150 1.830
L. Armstead Edwards 12,917 1.170
Marionette Y. Frazier 14,500 1.320
William C. Green (2) 18,583 1.690
Angela M. Huggins 8,368 0.760
William B. Moore 1,417 0.130
Evelyn F. Smalls (1) 50 0.005
Ernest L. Wright 7,084 0.640
------- ------
TOTAL 132,402 12.040%
======= ======
Each of these officers and directors are officers and directors of the
Registrant.
(1) The President and Chief Executive Officer, currently Evelyn F. Smalls, also
acts as Trustee of a voting trust agreement pursuant to which Fahnstock,
Inc deposited 5,209 shares of Common Stock of UBS with United Bank of
Philadelphia, as Trustee, to be voted by the current president and chief
executive officer pursuant to the terms of the Voting Trust. The term of
the Voting Trust is ten years.
The President and Chief Executive Officer, currently Evelyn Smalls, acts as
Trustee of a voting trust agreement pursuant to which NationsBank
Corporation deposited 33,500 shares of Common Stock of UBS with United Bank
of Philadelphia as Trustee, to be voted by the current President and Chief
Executive Officer pursuant to the terms of the Voting Trust. The term of
the Voting Trust is ten years.
(2) Owned jointly with Liller B. Green, his wife.
ITEM 13 -- CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Some of the directors and executive officer of the Bank and the Companies
with which they are associated were customers of and had banking transactions
with the Bank in the ordinary course of its business during the year 2000. All
loans and commitments to lend were made on substantially the same terms,
including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for
comparable transactions with other persons. In the opinion of Bank management,
the loan commitments did not involve more than normal risk of collectively or
present other unfavorable features.
35
PART IV
ITEM 14 -- EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial Statements: December 31, 2000 and 1999
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants, March 21, 2001
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2000 and 1999.
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three years ended
December 31, 2000.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the three years
ended December 31, 2000.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three years ended
December 31, 2000.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Financial Statement Schedules are omitted because the required
information is either not applicable, not required or is shown in the
respective financial statements or in the notes thereto.
3. The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by
reference as a part of this Annual Report.
3(i) Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to
Registrant's 1997 Form 10-K).
3(ii) Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Registrant's 1997 Form 10-K).
9.l Voting Trust Agreement with NationsBank (Incorporated by reference to
Registrant's 1997 Form 10-K).
9.2 Voting Trust Agreement with Fahnstock (Incorporated by reference to
Registrant's 1997 Form 10-K).
10(a) Lease Agreements between the Bank and various landlords.
(Incorporated by reference to Registrant's 1999 Form 10-K).
10(b) Employment contract between the Bank and Evelyn F. Smalls
10(c) Employment contract between the Bank and Brenda M. Hudson-Nelson
11. Statement of Computation of Earnings Per Share. Included at
Item 8 hereof.
12. Statement of Computation of Ratios. Included at Item 8 hereof.
(b) No reports on Form 8-K have been filed during the last quarter covered by
this report.
(c) Not applicable.
36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized
UNITED BANCSHARES, INC. DATE
/s/ Evelyn F. Smalls March 28, 2001
- ---------------------------------------------------- -----------------
Evelyn F. Smalls, President & CEO, Director
/s/ Brenda M. Hudson-Nelson March 28, 2001
- ---------------------------------------------------- -----------------
Brenda M. Hudson-Nelson, SVP, CFO
/s/ James F. Bodine March 28, 2001
- ---------------------------------------------------- -----------------
James F. Bodine, Director
/s/ S. Amos Brackeen March 28, 2001
- ---------------------------------------------------- -----------------
S. Amos Brackeen, Director
/s/ Kemel G. Dawkins March 28, 2001
- ---------------------------------------------------- -----------------
Kemel G. Dawkins, Director
/s/ L. Armstead Edwards March 28, 2001
- ---------------------------------------------------- -----------------
L. Armstead Edwards, Director
/s/ Marionette Y. Frazier March 28, 2001
- ---------------------------------------------------- -----------------
Marionette Y. Frazier, Assistant Secretary, Director
/s/ William C. Green March 28, 2001
- ---------------------------------------------------- -----------------
William C. Green, Director
/s/ Angela M. Huggins March 28, 2001
- ---------------------------------------------------- -----------------
Angela M. Huggins, Treasurer, Director
/s/ William B. Moore March 28, 2001
- ---------------------------------------------------- -----------------
William B. Moore, Secretary, Director
/s/ Ernest L. Wright March 28, 2001
- ---------------------------------------------------- -----------------
Ernest L. Wright, Director
37
Shareholders and Board of Directors
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of United
Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity
and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in note 15 to the financial statements, the Bank entered into a
written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and the
Pennsylvania Department of Banking dated February 23, 2000. Management's plans
in regard to this matter are described in note 15.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of United Bancshares,
Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the consolidated
results of their operations and their consolidated cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2000 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 21, 2001
38
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
----------------------------------
Assets 2000 1999
- ------ ---- ----
Cash and due from banks ........................................................ $ 5,328,384 $ 9,396,669
Interest-bearing deposits with banks ........................................... 245,496 365,547
Federal funds sold ............................................................. 720,000 7,158,000
------------- -------------
Cash and cash equivalents ............................................ 6,293,880 16,920,216
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale, at market value ........................................ 11,426,544 19,129,535
Held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (market value of $23,555,339
and $31,470,822 in 2000 and 1999, respectively) ......................... 23,587,092 32,303,774
Loans, net of unearned discount of $176,915 and $225,302 in 2000
and 1999, respectively ..................................................... 45,305,468 61,010,995
Less allowance for loan losses ................................................. (562,174) (1,566,642)
------------- -------------
Net loans ............................................................ 44,743,294 59,444,353
Bank premises and equipment, net ............................................... 3,457,518 3,825,321
Accrued interest receivable .................................................... 1,158,485 1,221,679
Foreclosed real estate ......................................................... 50,000 397,641
Intangible assets .............................................................. 2,297,674 2,428,524
Prepaid expenses and other assets .............................................. 518,721 1,578,036
------------- -------------
Total assets ......................................................... $ 93,533,208 $ 137,249,079
============= =============
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Liabilities:
Demand deposits, noninterest-bearing ....................................... $ 20,386,652 $ 26,206,218
Demand deposits, interest-bearing .......................................... 15,942,933 29,119,779
Savings deposits ........................................................... 25,355,811 33,342,400
Time deposits, under $100,000 .............................................. 12,489,281 23,464,035
Time deposits, $100,000 and over ........................................... 9,063,433 12,633,964
------------- -------------
83,238,110 124,766,396
Obligations under capital leases ........................................... -- 1,444,607
Accrued interest payable ................................................... 230,357 600,546
Accrued expenses and other liabilities ..................................... 715,232 1,410,215
------------- -------------
Total liabilities .................................................... 84,183,699 128,221,764
------------- -------------
Shareholders' equity:
Series A preferred stock, noncumulative, 6%, $0.01 par value, 500,000 shares
authorized; 143,150 issued and outstanding
in 2000 and 1999 ........................................................ 1,432 1,432
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized;
1,099,421 and 1,028,753 issued and outstanding in 2000 and
1999, respectively ...................................................... 10,994 10,288
Additional paid-in-capital ................................................. 14,717,484 13,870,169
Accumulated deficit ........................................................ (5,413,111) (4,658,391)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) .............................. 32,710 (196,183)
------------- -------------
Total shareholders' equity ........................................... 9,349,509 9,027,315
------------- -------------
$ 93,533,208 $ 137,249,079
============= =============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
39
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ ------------
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans................................... $ 4,655,329 $ 5,589,589 $ 6,270,323
Interest on investment securities............................ 3,150,160 1,812,983 1,275,542
Interest on federal funds sold............................... 339,348 680,715 688,285
Interest on time deposits with other banks................... 8,469 24,834 26,329
----------- ----------- -----------
Total interest income.................................. 8,153,306 8,108,121 8,260,479
----------- ----------- -----------
Interest expense:
Interest on time deposits.................................... 1,387,091 1,695,078 1,898,967
Interest on demand deposits.................................. 602,194 568,903 619,921
Interest on savings deposits................................. 496,764 440,002 427,682
Interest on borrowed funds................................... 252,515 140,075 73,265
----------- ----------- -----------
Total interest expense................................. 2,738,564 2,844,058 3,019,835
----------- ----------- -----------
Net interest income.................................... 5,414,742 5,264,063 5,240,644
Provision for loan losses........................................ 565,000 1,007,003 350,500
----------- ----------- -----------
Net interest income after provision for loan losses.... 4,849,742 4,257,060 4,890,144
----------- ----------- -----------
Noninterest income:
Gain on sale of loans........................................ 18,931 43,856 201,664
Customer service fees........................................ 2,617,845 2,031,245 1,457,508
Gain (loss) on sale of investments........................... (200,070) -- 1,201
Gain on sale of fixed assets................................. 329,237 -- --
Other income................................................. 430,991 151,303 155,663
----------- ----------- -----------
Total noninterest income............................... 3,196,934 2,226,404 1,816,036
---------- ---------- ----------
Noninterest expense:
Salaries, wages and employee benefits........................ 3,075,523 2,962,500 2,555,774
Occupancy and equipment...................................... 1,790,356 1,437,775 1,275,902
Office operations and supplies............................... 777,112 715,207 525,771
Marketing and public relations............................... 158,698 304,537 221,348
Professional services........................................ 544,083 393,607 232,793
Data processing.............................................. 971,503 863,208 868,665
Deposit insurance assessments................................ 169,102 104,991 82,389
Other operating.............................................. 1,315,019 931,861 933,605
----------- ----------- -----------
Total noninterest expense.............................. 8,801,396 7,713,686 6,696,247
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss)...................................... $ (754,720) $(1,230,222) $ 9,933
=========== =========== ===========
Net income (loss) per common share--basic and diluted............. $ (0.72) $ (1.24) $ 0.01
=========== =========== ===========
Weighted average number of common shares......................... 1,049,166 995,699 845,902
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
40
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
SERIES A ACCUMULATED TOTAL
PREFERRED STOCK COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL OTHER SHARE-
--------------- ------------ PAID-IN ACCUMULATED COMPREHENSIVE HOLDERS' COMPREHENSIVE
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL DEFICIT INCOME (LOSS) EQUITY INCOME (LOSS)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ------------- ------ -------------
Balance at
January 1, 1998 ........... 93,150 $ 932 823,695 $ 8,236 $10,425,626 $(3,438,102) $ 62,163 $ 7,058,855
Proceeds from issuance of
preferred stock ....... 39,849 398 -- -- 796,582 -- -- 796,980
Proceeds from issuance of
common stock .......... -- -- 89,795 898 1,064,025 -- -- 1,064,923
Unrealized losses on
investment securities . -- -- -- -- -- -- (26,375) (26,375) $ (26,375)
Net income ............... -- -- -- -- -- 9,933 -- 9,933 9,933
------- ------ --------- ------- ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- -----------
Balance at
December 31, 1998..........132,999 1,330 913,490 9,134 12,286,233 (3,428,169) 35,788 8,904,316 $ (16,442)
============
Proceeds from issuance of
preferred stock ....... 10,151 102 202,918 203,020
Proceeds from issuance of
common stock .......... 115,263 1,154 1,381,018 1,382,172
Unrealized losses on
investment securities . -- -- -- -- -- (231,971) $ (231,971)
Net loss ................. -- -- -- -- -- (1,230,222) -- (1,230,222) (1,230,222)
------- ------ --------- ------- ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- -----------
Balance at
December 31, 1999..........143,150 1,432 1,028,753 10,288 13,870,169 (4,658,391) (196,183) 9,027,315 $(1,462,193)
===========
Proceeds from issuance of
common stock .......... -- -- 70,668 706 847,315 -- -- 848,021
Unrealized gains on
investment securities . -- -- -- -- -- -- 228,893 228,893 $ 228,893
Net loss ................. -- -- -- -- -- (754,720) -- (754,720) (754,720)
------- ------ --------- ------- ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- -----------
Balance at
December 31, 2000..........143,150 $1,432 1,099,421 $10,994 $14,717,484 $(5,413,111) $ 32,710 $ 9,349,509 $ (525,827)
======= ====== ========= ======= =========== =========== ========= =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
41
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) ............................................ $ (754,720) $ (1,230,222) $ 9,933
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses ................................. 565,000 1,007,003 350,500
Gain on sale of loans ..................................... (18,931) (43,856) (201,664)
Gain on sale of fixed assets .............................. (329,237) -- --
Loss on sale of investment securities ..................... 200,070 -- (1,201)
Depreciation and amortization ............................. 959,158 677,452 584,744
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable and
other assets ........................................... 1,470,150 410,561 (1,345,070)
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable and
other liabilities ...................................... (1,065,172) (435,256) 1,402,385
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by operating activities .............. 1,026,318 385,682 799,627
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of available-for-sale investments ................... (1,737,678) (14,688,776) (11,708,818)
Purchase of held-to-maturity investments ..................... (2,636,746) (48,678,917) (33,748,996)
Proceeds from maturity and principal reductions of
available-for-sale investments ............................ 951,885 3,377,145 11,058,766
Proceeds from maturity and principal reductions of
held-to-maturity investments .............................. 982,708 51,501,203 9,429,511
Proceeds from sale of investments available-for-sale ........ 18,888,327 -- --
Net proceeds from branch acquisitions ........................ -- 27,694,690 --
Proceeds from sale of student loans .......................... 2,574,775 2,975,360 12,846,705
Proceeds from sale of deposits to other financial institutions (6,544,666) -- --
Net decrease (increase) in loans ............................. 11,580,215 15,870,049 8,276,373
Purchase of automobile loans ................................. -- (21,982,333) (4,848,864)
Purchase of premises and equipment ........................... (1,566,672) (1,429,324) (203,413)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities .... 22,492,148 14,639,097 (8,898,736)
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in deposits .......................... (34,983,620) (14,463,843) 9,636,339
Repayments on long-term debt ................................. (9,203) (11,191) (32,497)
Reverse repurchase agreement ................................. -- (1,557,755) 216,702
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock ................... 848,021 1,382,172 1,064,923
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock ................ -- 203,020 796,980
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities .... (34,144,802) (14,447,597) 11,682,447
------------ ------------ ------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ... (10,626,336) 577,182 3,583,338
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year ................... 16,920,216 16,343,034 12,759,696
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year ......................... $ 6,293,880 $ 16,920,216 $ 16,343,034
============ ============ ============
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for interest ....................... $ 3,108,753 $ 2,780,355 $ 2,960,086
============ ============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
42
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of United
Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) and its wholly owned subsidiary, United Bank
of Philadelphia (the Bank). All significant intercompany transactions and
balances have been eliminated.
Statement of Cash Flows
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash
on hand, amounts due from banks, and federal funds sold on an overnight
basis.
Securities Held-to-Maturity
Bonds, notes, and debentures for which the Bank has both the positive intent
and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and
carried at cost, adjusted for premiums and discounts that are recognized in
interest income using the interest method over the period to maturity.
Securities Available-for-Sale
Available-for-sale securities consist of bonds, notes and debentures, and
certain equity securities for which the Bank does not have positive intent to
hold to maturity. These securities are carried at fair value.
Unrealized holding gains and losses on securities classified as
available-for-sale are carried as a separate component of shareholders'
equity net of related income tax effects.
Gains and losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities are determined
by the specific identification method.
Premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest
method over the period to maturity.
Loans
The Bank has both the positive intent and ability to hold its loans to
maturity. These loans are stated at the amount of unpaid principal, reduced
by net unearned discount and an allowance for loan losses. Interest income on
loans is recognized as earned based on contractual interest rates applied to
daily principal amounts outstanding and accretion of discount. It is the
Bank's policy to discontinue the accrual of interest income when a default of
principal or interest exists for a period of 90 days except when, in
management's judgment, the collection of principal and interest is reasonably
anticipated or adequate collateral exists. Interest received on nonaccrual
loans is either applied against principal or reported as interest income
according to management's judgment as to collectibility of principal. When
interest accruals are discontinued, interest credited to income is reversed
and the loan is classified as nonperforming.
(Continued)
43
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued
Unearned discount is amortized over the weighted average maturity of the
mortgage loan portfolio.
Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination
costs are deferred, and the net amount is amortized as an adjustment of the
related loan's yield. The Bank is amortizing these amounts over the
contractual life of the loan.
Loans Held-for-Sale
Loans held-for-sale are carried at the aggregate of lower of cost or market
value.
For purchased loans, the discount remaining after the loan loss allocation is
being amortized over the remaining life of the purchased loans using the
interest method.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Bank adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 114,
"Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan," and SFAS No. 118,
"Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan Income Recognition and
Disclosures." Under SFAS No. 114, the allowance for loan losses related to
"impaired loans" is based on the discounted cash flows using the impaired
loans' initial effective interest rate as the discount rate, or the fair
value of the collateral for collateral-dependent loans. A loan is impaired
when it meets the criteria to be placed on nonaccrual status. Loans which are
evaluated for impairment pursuant to SFAS No. 114 are assessed on a
loan-by-loan basis and include only commercial nonaccrual loans. Large groups
of smaller, homogeneous loans, such as credit cards, student loans,
residential mortgages, and other student loans, are evaluated collectively
for impairment.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to
provide for potential losses in the loan portfolio. The allowance is
increased by provisions charged to operating expenses and reduced by
charge-offs net of recoveries. Management's determination of the adequacy of
the allowance is based on continuous credit reviews of the loan portfolio,
consideration of the current economic conditions, review of specific problem
loans, and other relevant factors. This evaluation is subjective as it
requires material estimates, including the amounts and timing of future cash
flows expected to be received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to
significant change. However, actual losses on specific loans, which are
encompassed in the analysis, may vary from estimated losses.
Bank Premises and Equipment
Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets. Amortization of leasehold improvements is
computed over the shorter of the related lease term or the useful life of the
assets.
(Continued)
44
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued
Income Taxes
The liability method is used in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the
enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are
expected to reverse.
Income (Loss) Per Share
The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 128, which eliminates primary
and fully diluted earnings per share (EPS) and requires presentation of basic
and diluted EPS in conjunction with the disclosure of the methodology used in
computing such EPS. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing
income available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS takes into account the potential
dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common
stock were exercised and converted into common stock.
Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, the Bank has entered into
off-balance-sheet financial instruments consisting of commitments to extend
credit and letters of credit. Such financial instruments are recorded in the
financial statements when they become payable.
Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Bank in estimating its
fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet
for cash and cash equivalents approximate those assets' fair values.
Investment securities: Fair values for investment securities are based on
quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not
available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable
instruments.
(Continued)
45
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued
In June 1998, SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities" was issued in June, 1999 by SFAS No. 137, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Deferral of the Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 133," and in June, 2000, by SFAS No. 138,
"Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging
Activities," (collectively SFAS No. 133). SFAS No. 133 requires that entities
recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of
financial condition and measure those instruments at fair value. Under SFAS
No. 133 an entity may designate a derivative as a hedge of exposure to either
changes in: (a) fair value of a recognized assets or liability or firm
commitment, (b) cash flows of a recognized or forecasted transaction, or (c)
foreign currencies of a net investment in foreign operations, firm
commitments, available-for-sale securities or a forecasted transaction.
Depending upon the effectiveness of the hedge and/or the transaction being
hedged, any changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument is either
recognized in earnings in the current year, deferred to future periods, or
recognized as hedge accounting are recognized in current year earnings. SFAS
No. 133 is required for all fiscal quarters or fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2000. On April 1, 2000, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133. Concurrent
with the adoption, the Company reclassified approximately $6.1 million of
investment securities from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale. Subsequent
to the reclassification, the Company transferred approximately $9.5 million
of investment securities from available-for-sale to trading. In June 2000,
the Company recorded a loss on the sale of these securities of $127,000.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 119 "Disclosure About
Derivative Financial Instruments and Fair Value of Financial Instruments,"
(SFAS No. 119) requires disclosures about financial instruments, which are
defined as futures, forwards, swap and option contracts and other financial
instruments with similar characteristics. On-balance sheet receivables and
payables are excluded from this definition. The Company did not hold any
derivative financial instruments as defined by SFAS No. 119 at December 31,
2000 or 1999.
Loans held-for-sale: Fair values are estimated using quoted rates based upon
secondary market sources for similar loans.
Loans: The fair value of loans was estimated using a discounted cash flow
analysis, which considered estimated prepayments and amortizations.
Prepayments and discount rates were based on current marketplace estimates
and pricing. Residential mortgage loans were discounted at the current
effective yield, including fees, of conventional loans, adjusted for their
maturities with a spread to the Treasury yield curve.
Deposit liabilities: The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g.,
interest and noninterest checking, passbook savings, and certain types of
money market accounts) are equal to the amounts payable on demand at the
reporting date (e.g., their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts for
variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit
approximate the fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate
certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow
calculation. The Treasury Yield Curve was utilized for discounting cash flows
as it approximates the average marketplace certificate of deposit rates
across the relevant maturity spectrum.
Commitments to extend credit: The carrying amounts for commitments to extend
credit approximate fair value as such commitments are not substantially
different from the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements,
taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present
creditworthiness of the counterparts.
(Continued)
46
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued
Foreclosed Real Estate
Real estate properties acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are
to be sold and are initially recorded at fair value at the date of
foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. After foreclosure, valuations are
periodically performed by management, and the real estate is carried at the
lower of carrying amount or fair value less the cost to sell. Revenue and
expenses from operations and changes in valuation allowance are charged to
operations. The historical average holding period for such properties is 24
months.
Management's Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Segments
SFAS No. 131 establishes standards for the way public business enterprises
report information about operating segments in annual financial statements
and requires that those enterprises report selected information about
operating segments in subsequent interim financial reports issued to
shareholders. It also establishes standards for related disclosures about
products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The statement
requires that a public business enterprise report financial and descriptive
information about its reportable operating segments. Operating segments are
components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is
available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker
in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. The statement
also requires that public enterprises report a measure of segment profit or
loss, certain specific revenue and expense items and segment assets. It also
requires that information be reported about revenues derived from the
enterprises' products or services, or about the countries in which the
enterprises earn revenues and hold assets, and about major customers,
regardless of whether that information is used in making operating decisions.
The Company has one reportable segment, "Community Banking." All of the
Company's activities are interrelated, and each activity is dependent and
assessed based on how each of the activities of the Company supports the
other. For example, commercial lending is dependent upon the ability of the
Bank to fund itself with retail deposits and other borrowings and to manage
interest rate and credit risk. This situation is also similar for consumer
and residential mortgage lending. Accordingly, all significant operating
decisions are based upon analysis of the Company as one operating segment or
unit.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years financial
statements to conform to the 2000 presentation.
(Continued)
47
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued
Organizational Costs
On January 1, 1999, the Bank adopted the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants' Statement of Position (SOP) 98-5, "Reporting on Costs of
Start-Up Activities" which requires that costs of start-up activities, as
defined, including organizational costs, be expensed as incurred. The
adoption of SOP 98-5 had no material impact on the Bank's financial
statements.
Comprehensive Income
On January 1, 1998, the Bank adopted SFAS No. 130, which establishes new
standards for reporting comprehensive income which includes net income as
well as certain other items which result in a change to equity during the
period. These financial statements have been reclassified to reflect the
provisions of SFAS No. 130. The income tax effects allocated to comprehensive
income (loss) is as follows:
DECEMBER 31, 2000
--------------------------------------
NET OF
BEFORE TAX TAX TAX
AMOUNT EXPENSE AMOUNT
------ ------- ------
Unrealized gains on securities
Unrealized holding gains
arising during period $543,166 $180,826 $362,340
Less reclassification adjustment
for losses realized in net income (200,070) (66,623) (133,447)
-------- -------- --------
Other comprehensive loss, net $343,096 $114,203 $228,893
======== ======== ========
DECEMBER 31, 1999
--------------------------------------
NET OF
BEFORE TAX TAX TAX
AMOUNT BENEFIT AMOUNT
------ ------- ------
Unrealized losses on securities
Unrealized holding losses
arising during period $(348,498) $(116,527) $(231,971)
Less reclassification adjustment
for losses realized in net income -- -- --
--------- --------- ---------
Other comprehensive loss, net $(348,498) $(116,527) $(231,971)
========= ========= =========
48
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued
DECEMBER 31, 1998
--------------------------------------
NET OF
BEFORE TAX TAX TAX
AMOUNT BENEFIT AMOUNT
------ ------- ------
Unrealized losses on securities
Unrealized holding losses
arising during period $(39,462) $(12,282) $(27,180)
Less reclassification adjustment
for gains realized in net income 1,201 396 805
-------- -------- --------
Other comprehensive loss, net $(38,261) $(11,886) $(26,375)
======== ======== ========
2. CASH AND DUE FROM BANK BALANCES
The Bank maintains various deposit accounts with other banks to meet normal
funds transaction requirements and to compensate other banks for certain
correspondent services. The withdrawal or usage restrictions of these
balances did not have a significant impact on the operations of the Bank as
of December 31, 2000.
3. INVESTMENTS
The amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains and losses, and estimated
market value of the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment
securities by major security type at December 31, 2000 and 1999 are as
follows:
2000
---------------------------------------------------------
GROSS GROSS
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED MARKET
COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
---- ----- ------ -----
Available-for-sale:
Other Government securities $ 5,475,732 $26,629 $ -- $ 5,502,361
Mortgage-backed securities 5,395,957 22,192 -- 5,418,149
----------- ------- -------- -----------
Total debt securities ..... 10,871,689 48,821 -- 10,920,510
Investments in mutual funds 100,084 -- -- 100,084
Other investments ......... 405,950 -- -- 405,950
----------- ------- -------- -----------
$11,377,723 $48,821 $ -- $11,426,544
=========== ======= ======== ===========
Held-to-maturity:
Other Government securities $15,260,048 $ -- $(20,454) $15,239,594
Mortgage-backed securities 8,327,044 -- (11,299) 8,315,745
----------- ------- -------- -----------
$23,587,092 $ -- $(31,753) $23,555,339
=========== ======= ======== ===========
(Continued)
49
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
3. INVESTMENTS - Continued
1999
--------------------------------------------------------------------
GROSS GROSS
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED MARKET
COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
---- ----- ------ -----
Available-for-sale:
Other Government securities $ 11,255,096 $ -- $ (207,335) $ 11,047,761
Mortgage-backed securities 7,668,672 -- (86,940) 7,581,732
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total debt securities 18,923,768 -- (294,275) 18,629,493
Investments in mutual funds 94,092 -- -- 94,092
Other investments 405,950 -- -- 405,950
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
$ 19,423,810 $ -- $ (294,275) $ 19,129,535
============ ============ ============ ============
1999
--------------------------------------------------------------------
GROSS GROSS
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED MARKET
COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
---- ----- ------ -----
Held-to-maturity:
Other Government securities $ 17,556,702 $ -- $ (506,631) $ 17,050,071
Mortgage-backed securities 14,747,072 -- (326,321) 14,420,751
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
$ 32,303,774 $ -- $ (832,952) $ 31,470,822
============ ============ ============ ============
Maturities of investment securities classified as available-for-sale and
held-to-maturity at December 31, 2000 were as follows. Expected maturities may
differ from contractual maturities.
Amortized Market
cost value
---- -----
Available-for-sale:
Due after one month through three years ... $ 1,999,625 $ 1,990,375
Due after three year through five years ... 1,000,000 997,623
Due after five years through fifteen years 2,476,107 2,514,363
Mortgage-backed securities ................ 5,395,957 5,418,149
----------- -----------
Total debt securities ..................... 10,871,689 10,920,510
Investments in mutual funds ............... 100,084 100,084
Other investments ......................... 405,950 405,950
----------- -----------
$11,377,723 $11,426,544
=========== ===========
(Continued)
50
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
3. INVESTMENTS - Continued
Amortized Market
cost value
---- -----
Held-to-maturity:
Due in one month through three years ...... $ 3,750,000 $ 3,733,380
Due after three years through five years .. 5,677,543 5,644,223
Due after five years through fifteen years 5,832,505 5,861,991
Mortgage-backed securities ................ 8,327,044 8,315,745
----------- -----------
$23,587,092 $23,555,339
=========== ===========
The Bank recorded a loss of $200,070 on the sale of investments during the
year ended December 31, 2000. There were no investments sold during 1999.
The Bank recorded a gain on the sale of investments during 1998 of $1,201.
As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, investment securities with a book value of
$12,930,953 and $9,964,172, respectively, were pledged as collateral to
secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law.
4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The composition of the net loans is as follows:
Assets 2000 1999
------ ---- ----
Commercial and industrial .......... $11,429,356 $13,664,212
Commercial real estate ............. 651,969 1,288,232
Residential mortgages .............. 22,316,280 26,236,947
Consumer loans ..................... 10,907,863 19,821,604
----------- -----------
Total loans ...................... 45,305,468 61,010,995
Less allowance for loan losses ...... (562,174) (1,566,642)
----------- -----------
Net loans......................... $44,743,294 $59,444,353
=========== ===========
As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, the Bank had loans to certain officers and
directors and their affiliated interests in aggregate dollar amounts of
approximately $1,463,900 and $1,442,600, respectively. During 2000 and 1999,
new loans to such related parties amounted to $86,800 and $429,000 and
repayments amounted to $65,500 and $126,700, respectively. Such transactions
are made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and
collateral, as those prevailing at the time for other nonrelated party
transactions.
Nonaccrual loans totaled approximately $453,000 and $2,027,000 as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
At December 31, 2000 and 1999, unamortized deferred fees and costs totaled
$111,413 and $151,645, respectively.
(Continued)
51
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES - Continued
Loans having a carrying value of $50,000 and $406,400 were transferred to
foreclosed real estate in 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Changes in the allowance for possible loan losses are as follows:
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
Balance, beginning of year $ 1,566,642 $ 679,557 $ 468,806
Provision ................ 565,000 1,007,003 350,500
Charge-offs .............. (1,720,755) (387,480) (180,727)
Recoveries ............... 151,287 267,562 40,978
----------- ----------- -----------
Balance, end of year ..... $ 562,174 $ 1,566,642 $ 679,557
=========== =========== ===========
At December 31, 2000, there were no loans considered to be impaired under
SFAS No. 114. At December 31, 1999, the recorded investment in loans that
were on a nonaccrual basis and were considered to be impaired under SFAS No.
114 was $844,300, respectively. At December 31, 1999, the related allowance
for loan losses was $674,100, respectively. The average recorded investment
in impaired loans during the year ended December 31, 1999 was approximately
$844,300. For the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, the Bank recognized
interest income on those impaired loans of $9,100 and $36,800, respectively.
The Bank grants commercial, residential, and consumer loans to customers
primarily located in Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania and surrounding
counties in the Delaware Valley. Although the Bank has a diversified loan
portfolio, its debtors' ability to honor their contracts is influenced by the
region's economy. During 2000, approximately 38% of the Bank's commercial
loan portfolio was concentrated in loans made to religious organizations.
5. BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
The major classes of bank premises and equipment and the total accumulated
depreciation are as follows:
Estimated
useful life 2000 1999
------------- ---- ----
Buildings and leasehold improvements 10-15 years $ 3,506,388 $ 3,654,194
Furniture and equipment........... 3- 7 years 3,100,810 2,710,371
----------- -----------
6,607,198 6,364,565
Less accumulated depreciation..... (3,149,680) (2,539,244)
----------- ----------
$ 3,457,518 $ 3,825,321
=========== ===========
(Continued)
52
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
5. BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT - Continued
In October 2000, the Bank purchased the building that houses its corporate
headquarters from a former officer in conjunction with the settlement of a
legal matter for approximately $1.4 million. Before its purchase, the Bank
leased this building from this officer under a non-cancelable capital lease.
At December 31, 1999, this lease was accounted for as a capital lease in the
amount of $1,483,000 with accumulated depreciation of $74,150.
The Bank leases other facilities and other equipment under non-cancelable
operating lease agreements. The amount of expense for operating leases for
the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 was $511,836, $367,554 and
$323,330.
Future minimum lease payments under operating leases are as follows:
Operating
Year ending December 31, leases
------------------------ ------
2001.................................................... $ 352,300
2002.................................................... 263,400
2003.................................................... 229,600
2004.................................................... 49,100
2005.................................................... 36,000
Thereafter.............................................. 21,000
-----------
Total minimum lease payments............................ $ 951,400
===========
6. DEPOSITS
At December 31, 2000, the scheduled maturities of time deposits (certificates
of deposit) are as follows (dollars in thousands):
2001..................................................... $ 19,551
2002..................................................... 841
2003..................................................... 634
2004..................................................... 233
2005..................................................... 218
Thereafter............................................... 76
----------
$ 21,553
==========
53
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
7. BORROWINGS
Reverse Repurchase Agreements
The Bank enters into sales of securities under agreements to repurchase
identical securities or reverse repurchase agreements. The amounts advanced
to the Bank under these agreements represent short-term loans and would be
reflected as a payable in the balance sheet. The securities underlying the
agreements are book-entry securities maintained at the Federal Reserve Bank
of Philadelphia. The average balance of reverse repurchase agreements entered
into during 2000 was $777,000 and the maximum amount outstanding at any
month-end during 2000 was $2.96 million. As of December 31, 2000, the Bank
had no reverse repurchase agreements outstanding.
Credit Lines
As of December 31, 2000, the Bank has outstanding two borrowing arrangements
with financial institutions, collateralized by investment securities. One
arrangement is a fully secured Federal Funds line of credit with a
correspondent bank totaling $2 million, the second is a Master Repurchase
Agreement with another financial institution. Borrowings under these
agreements have interest rates that fluctuate based on market conditions. As
of December 31, 2000, the Bank had no borrowings outstanding.
8. CAPITAL STOCK OFFERINGS
In June 2000 and December 2000, respectively, the Bank received $411,809 and
$436,212 and issued 34,317 and 36,351 shares, respectively, as a result of
the purchase of common stock by members of the Bank's board of directors in a
limited offering at a price of $12.00 per share.
On September 30, 1998, the Company designated a subclass of its Common Stock
as Class B. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment, holders of the Class B
Common Stock have rights of Common Stockholders, with the exception of voting
rights. On October 9, 1998, the Company sold 83,333 shares of Class B Common
Stock to one shareholder for a purchase price of $12 per share. On February
9, 1999 and September 24, 1999, the Bank sold 83,333 and 25,000 shares of
Class B Stock, respectively, to the same shareholder at $12 per share.
During 1998, the Bank received $64,922 and issued 6,492 shares as a result of
warrants exercised by shareholders to purchase common stock at a price of
$10.00 per share. As of December 31, 1998, no warrants remained outstanding.
In July 1998, the Company began a limited offering of its Series A Preferred
Stock (noncumulative, 6%, $.01 par value) to Fannie Mae Corporation. The
nonvoting preferred stock was offered at a price of $20 per share, in an
amount for which the aggregate purchase price does not exceed the lesser of
(1) 9.99% of the total equity of the Company or (2) $880,000. During 1998,
the Company received $796,980 and issued 39,849 shares of preferred stock
from this offering. During 1999, the Company received $203,020 from Fannie
Mae and issued 10,151 shares of preferred stock from this offering.
Upon the declaration of a common dividend, each of the Series A preferred
shares will be accorded a non-cumulative dividend preference equal to 6% of
the purchase price of the stock per annum prior to the payment of any
dividend on account of any other class or series of the Company. No dividends
have been declared or paid.
54
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
9. INCOME TAXES
The Bank accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
"Accounting for Income Taxes."
At December 31, 2000, the Bank has net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $4,300,000 for income tax purposes that begin to expire in 2008
through 2020.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and the amount used for income tax purposes. For financial
reporting purposes, a valuation allowance of $1,643,919 and $1,499,042 as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively, has been recognized to offset the
deferred tax assets related to the cumulative temporary differences and the
tax loss carryforwards. Significant components of the Bank's deferred tax
assets are as follows:
2000 1999
---- ----
Deferred tax assets:
Provision for loan losses $ 91,668 $ 467,180
Unrealized (gains) losses on investment securities (11,121) 98,092
Depreciation 147,588 29,390
Net operating loss carryforwards 1,465,342 880,707
Other (49,558) 23,673
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets (1,643,919) (1,499,042)
----------- -----------
Net deferred tax assets $ -- $ --
=========== ===========
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
Effective rate reconciliation:
Tax at statutory rate $(256,073) $(418,275) $ 3,377
Nondeductible expenses 4,903 33,742 17,634
Increase in valuation allowance 155,997 379,094 --
Other 95,173 6,055 --
(Utilization of) increase in
net operating loss -- (616) (21,011)
--------- --------- ---------
Total tax expense $ -- $ -- $ --
========= ========= =========
10. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT COMMITMENTS
The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in
the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.
These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and letters
of credit, which are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee
the performance of an obligation of a customer to a third party. Both
arrangements have credit risk essentially the same as that involved in
extending loans and are subject to the Bank's normal credit policies.
Collateral may be obtained based on management's assessment of the customer.
The Bank's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the
other party to the financial instruments is represented by the contractual
amount of those instruments.
(Continued)
55
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
10. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT COMMITMENTS - Continued
Summaries of the Bank's financial instrument commitments are as follows:
2000 1999
---- ----
Commitments to extend credit............. $ 5,570,835 $ 6,140,622
Outstanding letters of credit............ 139,000 259,000
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as
there is no violation of any condition established in the contract and unused
credit card lines. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire
without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a
fee.
11. FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair value information about financial instruments is required to be
disclosed, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, where it is
practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are
not available, fair values are based on estimates using discounted cash flows
or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by
assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash
flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be
substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could
not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. Certain financial
instruments and all nonfinancial instruments are exempt from disclosure
requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not
represent the underlying value of the Bank.
2000 1999
--------------------- ---------------------
CARRYING FAIR CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
------ ----- ------ -----
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents ... $ 6,294 $ 6,294 $16,920 $16,920
Investment securities ....... 35,014 34,982 51,433 50,600
Loans, net of allowance for
loan losses ............... 44,743 44,600 59,444 58,209
Liabilities:
Demand deposits ............. 36,330 36,330 55,326 55,326
Savings deposits ............ 25,356 25,356 33,342 33,342
Time deposits ............... 21,553 21,538 36,098 36,198
Off Balance Sheet:
Commitments to extend credit 5,571 5,571 6,141 6,141
Outstanding letters of credit 139 139 259 259
56
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
12. EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
In June 2000, the Bank entered into two-year employment agreements with its
chief executive officer and its chief financial officer covering such items a
salaries, bonuses and benefits. The agreements expire in 2002 and provide for
guaranteed minimum annual compensation over the term of the contracts. The
Company made no stock-based compensation awards to any employee during 2000,
1999 and 1998.
In accordance with the contractual terms with its former chief executive
officer, the Bank granted the option to acquire up to 4% of the Bank's stock
as of December 31, 1993 at $8.54 per share, which was the book value at the
date of grant.
The Company adopted a Stock Option Plan in 1998. Under this Plan, options to
acquire shares of common stock were granted to the former chief executive
officer. The Stock Option Plan provides for the granting of options at the
fair market value of the Company's common stock at the time the options are
granted. Each option granted under the stock Option Plan may be exercised
within a period of ten years from the date of grant. However, no option may
be exercised within one year from the date of grant. In 1998, options to
purchase 29,694 shares of the Company's common stock at a price of $8.54 per
share were awarded, to the former chief executive officer.
Had compensation cost for the Plan been determined based on the fair value of
the options at the grant date consistent with the method required by SFAS No.
123, "Accounting for Stock-based Compensation," the Company's net loss and
loss per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated
below:
Year ended December 31,
-----------------------
2000 1999
---- ----
(In thousands)
Net loss
As reported ................. $ (755) $ (1,230)
Pro forma ................... $ (755) $ (1,230)
Basic and Diluted loss per share
As reported ................. $ (0.72) $ (1.24)
Pro forma ................... $ (0.72) $ (1.24)
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions used for grants in 1998: no dividends declared; expected
volatility of 20%; a risk-free interest rate of 4.7%, and expected life of
10 years.
13. CORE DEPOSIT INTANGIBLES
On September 24, 1999, the Bank acquired four branches from First Union
Corporation with deposits totaling $31.5 million. The Bank paid a deposit
premium of 7%, or $2,186,500, and incurred approximately $351,650 in
consulting and other costs directly related to these branch acquisitions.
Subsequent to the acquisition, the Bank transferred back to First Union one
significant deposit relationship totaling $940,000 and received a $66,000
refund of deposit premium. The premium and branch acquisition costs are being
amortized over 14 years. Amortization totaled $176,818 and $43,626 for the
year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
57
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
14. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION--PARENT COMPANY ONLY
Condensed Balance Sheets
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
2000 1999
---- ----
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Due from banks (subsidiary) ............. $ 289 $ 289
Investment in United Bank of Philadelphia 9,061 8,738
-------- --------
Total assets ............................ $ 9,350 $ 9,027
======== ========
Shareholders' equity:
Series A preferred stock .................. $ 1 $ 1
Common Stock .............................. 11 10
Additional paid-in capital ................ 14,718 13,870
Accumulated deficit ....................... (5,413) (4,658)
Net unrealized holding gains (losses)
on securities available-for-sale ...... 33 (196)
-------- --------
Total shareholders' equity .............. $ 9,350 $ 9,027
======== ========
Condensed Statements of Operations
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(Dollars in thousands)
Equity in net income (loss) of subsidiary $ (755) $(1,230) $ 10
------- ------- -------
Net income (loss) $ (755) $(1,230) $ 10
======= ======= =======
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ (755) $(1,230) $ 10
Equity in net (income) loss of subsidiary 755 1,230 (10)
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by operating activities -- -- --
------- ------- -------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment in subsidiary (847) (1,561) (1,783)
------- ------- -------
Net cash used in investing activities (847) (1,561) (1,783)
------- ------- -------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Issuance of preferred stock -- 203 797
Issuance of common stock 847 1,382 1,065
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by financing activities 847 1,585 1,862
------- ------- -------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents -- 24 79
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 289 265 186
------- ------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 289 $ 289 $ 265
======= ======= =======
58
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
15. REGULATORY MATTERS
The Bank engages in the commercial banking business, with a particular focus
on serving Blacks, Hispanics and women, and is subject to substantial
competition from financial institutions in the Bank's service area. As a bank
holding company and a banking subsidiary, the Company and the Bank,
respectively, are subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve Board and the
Pennsylvania Department of Banking and are required to maintain capital
requirements established by those regulators. Prompt corrective actions may
be taken by those regulators against banks that do not meet minimum capital
requirements. Prompt corrective actions range from restriction or prohibition
of certain activities to the appointment of a receiver or conservator of an
institution's net assets. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can
initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by
regulators that if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the
Bank's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of the Bank's assets, liabilities, and certain
off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices,
the Bank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative
judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other
factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy
require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the
table below) of total Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) for
capital adequacy purposes to risk-weighted assets (as defined). Management
believes, as of December 31, 2000, that the Bank meets the capital adequacy
requirements to which it is subject.
In February 2000, as a result of a regulatory examination completed in
December 1999, the Bank entered into a Written Agreement (Agreement) with its
primary regulators with regard to, among other things, achievement of
agreed-upon capital levels, implementation of a viable earnings/strategic
plan, adequate funding of the allowance for loan losses, the completion of a
management review and succession plan, and improvement in internal controls.
The current Agreement requires the Bank to increase its capital ratio to 6.5%
by June 30, 2000 and to 7% at all times thereafter. As of December 31, 2000,
the Bank had met the required ratios by implementing strategies that
included: increasing profitability, consolidating branches, and soliciting
new and additional sources of capital. Management continues to address all
matters outlined in the Agreement. Its most recent notification from its
regulators dated January 13, 2001, indicates that it is "partially" in
compliance with the Agreement's terms and conditions. Failure to comply could
result in additional regulatory supervision and/or actions.
Beginning in 1996, the Bank has operated under a Supervisory Letter from its
primary regulator. The Supervisory Letter prevents the Bank and the Company
from declaring or paying dividends without the prior written approval of its
regulators and prohibits the Bank and Company from issuing long-term debt.
The most recent notification dated January 13, 2001, from the Federal Reserve
Bank categorized the Bank as "adequately capitalized" under the regulatory
framework for prompt and corrective action. To be categorized as "well
capitalized," the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I
risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. The
Bank's growth, continued losses and the additional provisions to the
allowance for loans losses may have an adverse effect on its capital ratios.
(Continued)
59
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
15. REGULATORY MATTERS - Continued
The Bank's actual capital amounts and ratios are as follows:
(IN THOUSANDS)
TO BE WELL
CAPITALIZED UNDER
FOR CAPITAL PROMPT CORRECTIVE
ACTUAL ADEQUACY PURPOSES ACTION PROVISIONS
----------------- ----------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO
------ ----- ------ ----- ------ -----
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2000:
TOTAL CAPITAL TO RISK-
WEIGHTED ASSETS:
CONSOLIDATED $ 7,556 17.59% $ 3,459 equal or greater than 8.00% N/A N/A
BANK 7,267 16.92 3,436 equal or greater than 8.00 4,295 equal or greater than 10.00%
TIER I CAPITAL TO RISK-
WEIGHTED ASSETS:
CONSOLIDATED 7,019 16.34 1,730 equal or greater than 4.00 N/A N/A
BANK 6,730 15.67 1,718 equal or greater than 4.00 2,577 equal or greater than 6.00%
TIER I CAPITAL TO AVERAGE
ASSETS:
CONSOLIDATED 7,019 7.39 3,812 equal or greater than 4.00 N/A N/A
BANK 6,730 7.08 3,800 equal or greater than 4.00 4,750 equal or greater than 5.00%
TO BE WELL
CAPITALIZED UNDER
FOR CAPITAL PROMPT CORRECTIVE
ACTUAL ADEQUACY PURPOSES ACTION PROVISIONS
----------------- ----------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO
------ ----- ------ ----- ------ -----
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999:
TOTAL CAPITAL TO RISK-
WEIGHTED ASSETS:
COMPANY (CONSOLIDATED) $ 7,564 12.44% $ 4,864 equal or greater than 8.00% N/A N/A
BANK 7,275 12.07 4,822 equal or greater than 8.00 6,027 equal or greater than 10.00%
TIER I CAPITAL TO RISK-
WEIGHTED ASSETS:
COMPANY (CONSOLIDATED) 6,794 11.18 2,431 equal or greater than 4.00 N/A N/A
BANK 6,505 10.80 2,409 equal or greater than 4.00 3,614 equal or greater than 6.00%
TIER I CAPITAL TO AVERAGE
ASSETS:
COMPANY (CONSOLIDATED) 6,794 5.08 5,350 equal or greater than 4.00 N/A N/A
BANK 6,505 4.87 5,343 equal or greater than 4.00 6,679 equal or greater than 5.00%
60
United Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In the ordinary course of business, the Bank has various outstanding
commitments and contingent liabilities that are not reflected in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements. In addition, the Bank is a
defendant in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course
of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal
counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a
material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of the
Company.
17. EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION
In accordance with SFAS No. 128, income (loss) per share is calculated as
follows:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
----------------------------------------
LOSS SHARES PER SHARE
(NUMERATOR) (DENOMINATOR) AMOUNT
----------- ------------- ------
NET LOSS $ (754,720)
===========
BASIC LOSS PER SHARE
LOSS AVAILABLE TO STOCKHOLDERS $ (754,720) 1,049,166 $(0.72)
=========== ========= ======
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
----------------------------------------
LOSS SHARES PER SHARE
(NUMERATOR) (DENOMINATOR) AMOUNT
----------- ------------- ------
NET LOSS $(1,230,222)
===========
BASIC EPS
LOSS AVAILABLE TO STOCKHOLDERS $(1,230,222) 995,699 $(1.24)
=========== ======== ======
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
----------------------------------------
LOSS SHARES PER SHARE
(NUMERATOR) (DENOMINATOR) AMOUNT
----------- ------------- ------
NET INCOME $ 9,933
=======
BASIC EPS
INCOME AVAILABLE TO STOCKHOLDERS $ 9,933 845,902 $0.01
======= ======= =====
61