[LETTERHEAD]

June 15, 2005



United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F. Street NE
Washington, D.C. 20549
         ATTN:             Pamela A. Long
                           Bret Johnson
                           John Cash
                           Brigitte Lippman
                           Lesli Sheppard

Re:      Source Direct Holdings, Inc.
         Registration Statement on Form SB-2
         Originally Filed on May 5, 2005
         SEC File No. 333-124669

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We refer you to the letter of the staff of the Commission (the "Staff") dated
May 31, 2005 (the "Comment Letter"), with regard to the registration statement
(the "Registration Statement") referenced above filed by Source Direct Holdings,
Inc. ("Source Direct" or the "Company). This letter is directed to you on behalf
of the Company and contains its responses to the Staff's comments set forth in
the Comment Letter.

By way of information, since the filing of the Registration Statement on May 5,
2005, the Company filed on May 18, 2005, a quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005. The Company subsequently filed an amendment to
the quarterly report on June 10, 2005, on Form 10-QSB/A (the "Quarterly
Report"), to correct certain typographical errors and to clarify certain items
in the Management's Discussion and Analysis section. The Company has updated the
financial information in the Registration Statement to reflect the information
included in the Quarterly Report.

For the convenience of the Staff, the Company has included three clean copies
and three redlined copies of the Registration Statement showing changes to the
Registration Statement in response to the Comment Letter and in connection with
the filing of the Quarterly Report. Additionally for your convenience, the
Staff's comments from the Comment Letter





United States Securities and Exchange Commission
June 15, 2005
Page 2

have been restated below and are followed by the Company's responses.

General

1. We note that your officers and directors file Section 16 reports and that
your most recent Form 10-KSB states that your common stock is registered
pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. However we do not see the form
you have filed to register your class of common stock under the Exchange Act.
Please advise.

Response to Comment 1.

         The Company has filed an amendment to its annual report on Form
         10-KSB/A for the year ended June 30, 2004, to remove the reference to
         securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act.
         (The filing of the amended annual report was made on June 10, 2005.)

Signature Page

2. If true, please identify Deren Smith as your principal executive officer and
Kevin Arave as your principal financial and principal accounting officer.

Response to Comment 2.

         The Company has revised the signature page as requested.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

3. Have your auditors revise their report to include the conformed signature
which exactly matches the name of the audit firm registered with the PCAOB.
Additionally, please review for correctness the footnote reference presented in
the fourth paragraph of their report.

Response to Comment 3.

         Mantyla McReynolds has revised the conformed signature to match its
         name as registered with the PCAOB. Additionally, Mantyla McReynolds has
         revised the final paragraph to refer to Note E rather than to Note D.
         The corrected version of the audit report is included with the
         financial statements which are a part of the Registration Statement.

4. We note your auditors, Mantyla McReynolds, LLC, are duly registered and in
good standing to practice in Utah. However, Mantyla McReynolds is not currently
licensed in Idaho where your company is located. Tell us why you selected a Utah
based accounting firm to





United States Securities and Exchange Commission
June 15, 2005
Page 3

audit the financial statements of an Idaho based company. Tell us if the audit
was physically performed in Utah or Idaho. Also, confirm to us that the
operations and assets of your company are physically located in Idaho. Please
note that it is your responsibility to provide financial statements audited by
an auditor who meets the requirements of Rule 2-01(a) of Regulation S-X. Tell us
how you have met the requirements of Rule 2-01(a) of Regulation S-X. Also tell
us what consideration you gave to Idaho state laws governing audits of Idaho
companies performed by accountants from other states.

Response to Comment 4.

     o    By way of background  information,  when Source Direct, Inc. (an Idaho
          corporation),   merged  with  Global-Tech   Capital  Corp.  (a  Nevada
          corporation and public company) in October 2003, the surviving entity,
          whose name was changed to Source Direct  Holdings,  Inc.,  was working
          with several  consultants who recommended that the Company use Mantyla
          McReynolds as its independent  public accounting firm. The officers of
          the Company  attempted to locate an  accounting  firm located in Idaho
          Falls, Idaho, to serve as the independent public accounting firm for a
          public  company  but was  unable  to  locate  one,  and  followed  the
          recommendation  of the consultants.  The Company has continued to work
          with Mantyla McReynolds since the merger.

     o    Mantyla McReynolds  informed the Company that it performed most of the
          audit  procedures  in its  office in Salt Lake  City,  Utah.  However,
          Mantyla McReynolds performed limited procedures in Idaho consisting of
          an  observation  of the inventory and certain other assets  located at
          the facility.  Further,  while in Idaho,  Mantyla McReynolds  examined
          supporting  documentation  for  selected  transactions  as part of its
          testing of liabilities, asset acquisitions and expense detail.

     o    The Company  confirms  that its  operations  and assets are located in
          Idaho Falls, Idaho.

     o    Upon  review  of  Rule  2-01(a),   the  Company  inquired  of  Mantyla
          McReynolds  about  whether  they  are  "duly  registered  and in  good
          standing  as such  under  the laws of the  place of his  residence  or
          principal office." They indicate that they currently are and were duly
          registered and in good standing  during the  performance of the audit.
          The Company has also  contacted the Idaho State Board of  Accountancy,
          which has told the  Company  that they  require a  temporary  practice
          privilege  for  out-of-state  CPAs who wish to practice in Idaho.  The
          Board of  Accountancy  suggested  that the Company  have its  auditors
          complete an  application  and pay the required fee. The Idaho Board of
          Accountancy  indicated that the  qualifications  for licensure in Utah
          are at least as  stringent  as they are in Idaho.  Mantyla  McReynolds
          stated that typically they





United States Securities and Exchange Commission
June 15, 2005
Page 4

          obtain a  temporary  license  when they  perform  audits out of state.
          However,  as an  oversight,  in the case of the Company's  audit,  the
          auditors  failed to obtain a temporary  practice  privilege for Idaho.
          Upon  realization  of  this  oversight,  Mantyla  McReynolds  promptly
          applied for practice  privileges in Idaho,  and has been notified that
          its application for Idaho Practice Privileges was approved.

          With  respect  to the audit for the 2004  fiscal  year end,  the Idaho
          Board of Accountancy  Administrative  Rule 303 allows an individual to
          work up to 10 days  performing  accounting  work  without  a  practice
          privilege.  This  exception  applies  per  person,  and not per  firm.
          Mantyla McReynolds has informed the Company three professionals worked
          on the  engagement  including  one  individual  who worked two days in
          Idaho.  The  remainder  of the work  was  performed  in Utah.  None of
          Mantyla   McReynolds'   personnel  exceeded  the  10  day  limit,  and
          accordingly,  the exemption under Administrative Rule 303 would appear
          to cover  the work  performed.  Additionally,  as  noted  above,  with
          respect  to  future  work to be  performed  for the  Company,  Mantyla
          McReynolds has applied for and received practice privileges in Idaho.

Conclusion

Effectiveness of the Registration Statement is critical to the Company. As such,
the Company respectfully requests the Staff to review the response letter as
quickly as possible, with a view to the Commission allowing the registration
statement to go effective as early as June 20, 2005, or as soon thereafter as is
reasonably practical. The Company will file a formal request for acceleration of
effectiveness upon confirmation from the Staff that no further revisions to the
registration statement are required.

Please contact me (801-415-3056) with any additional questions or comments.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Very truly yours,

DURHAM JONES & PINEGAR

/s/ C. Parkinson Lloyd

C. Parkinson Lloyd

cpl/