SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                 SCHEDULE 14D-9


          SOLICITATION/RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 14(D)(4)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                (Amendment No. 2)


                    AMERICAN RETIREMENT VILLAS PROPERTIES II,
                        A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                            (Name of Subject Company)


                        MACKENZIE PATTERSON FULLER, INC.
                              MP VALUE FUND 6, LLC

                      (Name of Person(s) Filing Statement)


                     UNITS OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS

                         (Title of Class of Securities)


                       (CUSIP Number of Class Securities)

                              Chip Patterson, Esq.
                        MacKenzie Patterson Fuller, Inc.
                               1640 School Street
                            Moraga, California 94556
                                 (800) 854-8357

       (Name, Address and Telephone Number of Person Authorized to Receive
     Notices and Communications on behalf of the Person(s) Filing Statement)

This Amendment No. 2 amends and supplements the Solicitation/Recommendation
Statement on Schedule 14D-9 (the "Statement") filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on August 6, 2004 by MacKenzie Patterson Fuller,
Inc., a California corporation and MP Value Fund 6, LLC, as amended and
supplemented by Amendment No. 1 to the Statement filed August 11, 2004, relating
to the Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO filed with the SEC by ARVP II
Acquisition, L.P., a California limited partnership (the "Bidder"), Atria Senior
Living Group, Inc. ("Atria") and ARV Assisted Living, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("ARV," and together with Atria and the Bidder, the "GP




Affiliates"), as amended and supplemented by Amendment No. 1 to the Initial
Schedule TO filed by the GP Affiliates with the SEC on March 4, 2004, Amendment
No. 2 to the Initial Schedule TO filed by the GP Affiliates with the SEC on
March 26, 2004, Amendment No. 3 to the Initial Schedule TO filed by the GP
Affiliates with the SEC on May 5, 2004, Amendment No. 4 to the Initial Schedule
TO filed by the GP Affiliates with the SEC on May 11, 2004, Amendment No. 5 to
the Initial Schedule TO filed by the GP Affiliates with the SEC on May 17, 2004,
Amendment No. 6 to the Initial Schedule TO filed by the GP Affiliates with the
SEC on June 4, 2004, Amendment No. 7 to the Initial Schedule TO filed by the GP
Affiliates with the SEC on June 18, 2004, Amendment No. 8 to the Initial
Schedule TO filed by the GP Affiliates with the SEC on July 12, 2004, Amendment
No. 9 to the Initial Schedule TO filed by the GP Affiliates with the SEC on July
26, 2004, and Amendment No. 10 to the Initial Schedule TO filed by the GP
Affiliates with the SEC on August 12, 2004 (the "Amendments", together with the
Initial Schedule TO, the "Schedule TO"). ARV, which is wholly-owned by Atria, is
the general partner of the Bidder.


The information set forth in the Statement filed August 6, 2004, as amended and
supplemented by Amendment No. 1 to the Statement filed August 11, 2004, is
incorporated by reference in this Amendment No. 2 to the Statement in Items 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9.

Item 4. The Solicitation or Recommendation.

         (a) Solicitation or Recommendation. The Filing Persons are NO LONGER
advising holders of Units ("Unitholders") to reject the Offer and not tender
their Units pursuant to the Offer. The Filing Persons are sending to Unitholders
a letter indicating that the Filing Persons no longer oppose the Offer and
intend to tender their own Units. A copy of such letter is attached to this
Statement as Exhibit (a)(2).

         (b) Reason. The Filing Persons are no longer recommending that
Unitholders reject the Offer for the following reason:

   As the Filing Persons explained in their prior letter to Unitholders and in
   the Statement, they believe that an offer of $400 per Unit is a fair price
   such that the Filing Persons intend to tender their Units pursuant to the
   Offer. Although the Filing Persons' valuation of the Partnership is higher
   than the $400, a liquidation of the Partnership could take several years.
   Discounting the net asset value to account for the time value of money is
   appropriate. Based upon our experience, we estimated that it would take the
   Partnership several years to sell the 10 facilities it owns and distribute
   the proceeds, so we used a three-year period as an approximation of the time
   period unitholders might have to wait to receive the estimated net asset
   value of the Partnership's assets. Thus, the Filing Persons believe that a
   $400 tender offer is an acceptable tender price at this time.

   Previously, the Filing Persons indicated that they believed the net asset
   value of the units is approximately $494 per unit. We calculated this value
   as follows:

   The Filing Persons first calculated the "Estimated Net Sales Value" of the
   Partnership's real property investments. The Estimated Net Sales Value was
   determined by first determining the properties' net operating income ("NOI").
   The NOI was calculated by subtracting from rental income the properties'
   operating expenses. This NOI was then divided by a 12.5% capitalization rate
   (the "Cap Rate") and the result reduced by 3% to take into account the
   estimated closing costs which would be incurred upon sale by the Partnership
   of the properties, including brokerage commissions, title costs, surveys,
   appraisals, legal fees and transfer taxes. The Filing Persons believe that
   the Cap Rate utilized is within a range of capitalization rates currently
   employed in the marketplace for properties of similar type, age, and quality.
   The Filing Persons chose the Cap Rate used (which is at the high end of what
   they believe is appropriate) because of the significant capital expenditures
   that will be required for the properties over the near term. The utilization
   of different capitalization rates, however, could also be appropriate. In
   this regard, Unitholders should be aware that the use of lower capitalization
   rate would result in a higher Estimated Net Sales Value. To determine the
   Estimated Liquidation Value of the Partnership's assets, the Purchaser added

                                       2


   to the Estimated Net Sales Value of the Partnership's properties the net
   current assets and subtracted the current liabilities relating to the
   properties, as reported in the Partnership's most recent Form 10-Q, reduced
   that amount by the general partner's share, and calculated the amount of the
   balance allocable to the Units. The resulting Estimated Liquidation Value of
   the Partnership's assets per was approximately $494 per Unit. Furthermore,
   the Filing Persons multiplied the total number of assisted living units owned
   or licensed by the Partnership, 921, by an estimated comparable sales value
   of $62,000 per unit, then made the same adjustments as above to determine the
   Estimated Liquidation Value of the Partnership's assets on a per unit basis,
   which was approximately the same value as the value arrived at under the
   capitalization of net income approach. The Filing Persons emphasize that this
   value was calculated by them solely for purposes of deciding whether to
   tender their Units. There can be no assurance as to the actual liquidation
   value of Partnership assets or as to the amount or timing of distributions of
   liquidation proceeds which may be received by Unit holders. There can be no
   assurance as to the availability or timing of any liquidation proceeds.

   The Filing Persons are not qualified as real estate appraisers and have
   relied solely on publicly available information in making their estimate of
   the value of the Partnership's assets. The Filing Persons estimated value of
   Partnership assets was calculated solely for purposes of valuing their own
   interests and cannot be relied upon as representing an amount which might
   actually be realized upon a liquidation of the Partnership's assets, whether
   now or at any time in the future. The Partnership has not announced any
   pending offer to purchase its assets. Accordingly, there can be no assurance
   as to the availability or timing of any liquidation proceeds.

   No independent person has been retained to evaluate or render any opinion
   with respect to the value. Other measures of the value of the Units may be
   relevant to Unit holders. Unit holders are urged to consider carefully all of
   the information contained herein and in the Schedule TO and consult with
   their own advisors, tax, financial or otherwise, in evaluating the terms of
   the Schedule TO offer before deciding whether to tender Units.

         (c) Intent to Tender. The Filing Persons intend to tender pursuant to
the Offer all of the Units they hold of record and own beneficially.

Item 9. Exhibits.

        Exhibit No.                  Description
        -------------  --------------------------------------------------------
        (a)(1)         Letter to Limited Partners dated August 6, 2004
                       (incorporated by reference to the Statement filed August
                       6, 2004).
        (a)(2)         Letter to Limited Partners dated August 16, 2004.

                                    SIGNATURE

     After due inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify
that the information set forth in this statement is true, complete and correct.


Dated August 16, 2004

                                        MACKENZIE PATTERSON FULLER, INC.

                                             By: /s/ Chip Patterson
                                             ----------------------------
                                             Chip Patterson
                                             Vice President











                                       3