March 24, 2006 Daniel F. Duchovny Office of Mergers and Acquisitions Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P., Schedule TO-T filed March 2, 2006 by MacKenzie Patterson Fuller, LP and its affiliates, the Purchasers Dear Mr. Duchovny: Thank you for your letter dated March 13, 2006 regarding our recent Schedule TO-T. I will respond to the questions you asked in your letter in the order in which you posed them. 1. We agree that all such conditions must be satisfied or waived prior to expiration and that we cannot accept securities prior to expiration. Nonetheless, the depository has signed letters of transmittal prior to expiration, hence the disclosure. We disclose this potential conflict without being able to state what the conflict might be because we don't really know what conflict could arise. Hence, we also say because the Depository's role is administrative only, any conflict would be immaterial. The reason for this disclosure is just to raise the issue that the Depository is not an independent party. This is really an immaterial issue--we are being overbroad, if anything, and disclosing, in response to prior comments, that the depository is not independent. All we mean is that when security holders send their tender documents to us, we are in control of them even if the offer has not closed. In other words, we may have the piece of paper that a unit holder signs prior to expiration of the offer. Of course we are obligated to recognize the withdrawal rights of the security holder and cannot purchase the units prior to expiration and the satisfaction or waiver of all conditions (and the letter of transmittal incorporates the terms and conditions of the Offer, so it would be inoperative if we did not comply with the offer terms). 2. Section 13 states that "The Purchasers shall not be required to accept for payment or pay for any Units and may terminate or amend the Offer as to such Units if, at any time on or after the date of the Offer and before the Expiration Date, any of the following conditions exists...." The last paragraph of the cover page you reference states that we can "upon the occurrence of any of the conditions specified in Section 13...," terminate the offer, thus incorporating the requirement that termination occur before the expiration, a logical requirement as well. Further, the third clause includes the requirement that any amendment be made "prior to the Expiration Date." We believe this is quite clear, and we affirm our agreement with your position that all such conditions or changes must occur prior to the Expiration Date. 3. You are correct, that sentence should have been completely deleted. However, because it doesn't say anything, it is immaterial. If we revise or amend the offer, we will note that error, but do not believe that it is important enough to amend the offer. Closing paragraphs: While acknowledging the Staff's positions, and without implying any specific issue with such position, we respectfully decline to make the statements requested. There is no requirement that we do so. To the extent the requested statements are accurate statements of applicable law, there is no reason to obtain from bidders a recitation of such law. To the extent the statements go beyond applicable law or reflect interpretations of law that may be open to dispute, it would not be fair or appropriate to require bidders to make statements that might prejudice their right to take a contrary position at some later time, if the occasion arose. Please let me know if you have any questions or further comments. Very Truly Yours, Chip Patterson Senior Vice President and General Counsel (925) 631-9100 ext. 206 (925) 871-4046 (Fax) chip@mpfi.com