================================================================================
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
--------------
FORM 10-Q
--------------
(Mark one)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2001
OR
[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________
000-29748
(Commission file number)
--------------
ECHELON CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
--------------
Delaware 77-0203595
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
550 Meridian Avenue
San Jose, CA 95126
(Address of principal executive office and zip code)
(408) 938-5200
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_]
As of October 31, 2001, 38,539,682 shares of the Registrant's common
stock were outstanding.
================================================================================
ECHELON CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001
INDEX
Page
---------
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2001 and
December 31, 2000 ...................................................................... 3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and nine months
ended September 30, 2001 and September 30, 2000 ........................................ 4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2001 and September 30, 2000 .............................................. 5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements .................................... 6
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations ............................................................................. 12
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk .............................. 16
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings ....................................................................... 26
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds ............................................... 26
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities ......................................................... 26
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders ..................................... 26
Item 5. Other Information ....................................................................... 26
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K ........................................................ 26
SIGNATURE ................................................................................................ 26
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
U.S. federal securities laws that involve risks and uncertainties. Certain
statements contained in this report are not purely historical including, without
limitation, statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, intentions or
strategies regarding the future that are forward-looking. These statements
include those discussed in Item 2, Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, including "Liquidity and Capital
Resources," "New Accounting Standards" and "Factors That May Affect Future
Results of Operations," and elsewhere in this report. These statements include
statements concerning projected revenues, international revenues, expenses,
gross profit, income, product development and market acceptance of our products.
In this report, the words "anticipate," "believe," "expect," "intend,"
"future," "moving toward" and similar expressions also identify forward-looking
statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those
forward-looking statements contained in this report as a result of a number of
risk factors including, but not limited to, those set forth in the section
entitled "Factors That May Affect Future Results of Operations" and elsewhere in
this report. You should carefully consider these risks, in addition to the other
information in this report and in our other filings with the SEC. All
forward-looking statements and reasons why results may differ included in this
report are made as of the date of this report, and we assume no obligation to
update any such forward-looking statement or reason why such results might
differ.
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
ECHELON CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
September 30, December 31,
2001 2000
------------- -------------
(unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents ................................................ $ 51,319 $ 117,664
Short-term investments ................................................... 70,188 33,129
Accounts receivable, net ................................................. 17,819 9,548
Inventories .............................................................. 15,418 5,745
Other current assets ..................................................... 5,773 5,203
------------- -------------
Total current assets ................................................. 160,517 171,289
------------- -------------
Property and equipment, net .............................................. 12,699 3,085
Other long-term assets ................................................... 5,897 1,302
------------- -------------
$ 179,113 $ 175,676
============= =============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable ......................................................... $ 7,575 $ 4,200
Accrued liabilities ...................................................... 2,102 1,606
Deferred revenues ........................................................ 706 1,106
------------- -------------
Total current liabilities ............................................ 10,383 6,912
------------- -------------
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Deferred rent ............................................................ 10 3
------------- -------------
Total long-term liabilities .......................................... 10 3
------------- -------------
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Common stock ............................................................. 385 380
Additional paid-in capital ............................................... 264,953 263,248
Treasury stock ........................................................... (3,191) ---
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) ............................ 155 (330)
Deferred compensation .................................................... (77) (215)
Accumulated deficit ...................................................... (93,505) (94,322)
------------- -------------
Total stockholders' equity ........................................... 168,720 168,761
------------- -------------
$ 179,113 $ 175,676
============= =============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
3
ECHELON CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
REVENUES:
Product ................................................. $ 17,655 $ 11,738 $ 43,014 $ 34,778
Service ................................................. 328 491 1,474 1,545
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total revenues ...................................... 17,983 12,229 44,488 36,323
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
COST OF REVENUES:
Cost of product ......................................... 8,697 4,433 18,550 13,088
Cost of service ......................................... 518 422 1,741 1,452
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total cost of revenues .............................. 9,215 4,855 20,291 14,540
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Gross profit ........................................ 8,768 7,374 24,197 21,783
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Product development ..................................... 4,320 2,866 12,208 8,141
Sales and marketing ..................................... 3,732 3,808 11,471 12,048
General and administrative .............................. 1,438 1,360 5,239 3,989
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total operating expenses ............................ 9,490 8,034 28,918 24,178
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Loss from operations ................................ (722) (660) (4,721) (2,395)
Interest and other income, net .......................... 1,511 826 5,572 1,478
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Income/(loss) before provision for income taxes ..... 789 166 851 (917)
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES ................................. 32 38 34 114
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net income/(loss) ....................................... $ 757 $ 128 $ 817 $ (1,031)
========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income/(loss) per share:
Basic ............................................... $ 0.02 $ 0.00 $ 0.02 $ (0.03)
========== ========== ========== ==========
Diluted ............................................. $ 0.02 $ 0.00 $ 0.02 $ (0.03)
========== ========== ========== ==========
Shares used in computing net income/(loss) per share:
Basic ............................................... 38,648 35,284 38,436 34,342
========== ========== ========== ==========
Diluted ............................................. 41,526 39,483 41,273 34,342
========== ========== ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
ECHELON CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
-----------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income/(loss).................................................................. $ 817 $ (1,031)
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash used in operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization .................................................. 1,492 895
Provision for doubtful accounts ................................................ 200 ---
Deferred compensation expense .................................................. 138 138
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable .......................................................... (8,471) (409)
Inventories .................................................................. (9,673) (3,491)
Other current assets ......................................................... (570) (2,781)
Accounts payable ............................................................. 3,375 793
Accrued liabilities .......................................................... 496 (666)
Deferred revenues ............................................................ (400) (595)
Deferred rent ................................................................ 7 ---
---------- ----------
Net cash used for operating activities .................................... (12,589) (7,147)
---------- ----------
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of available-for-sale short-term investments ............................. (51,571) (1,829)
Proceeds from maturities and sales of available-for-sale short-term investments ... 14,512 14,463
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities ........................................... 669 (10)
Change in other long-term assets .................................................. (4,988) (674)
Capital expenditures .............................................................. (10,713) (1,151)
---------- ----------
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities ...................... (52,091) 10,799
---------- ----------
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock ............................................ 1,710 135,122
Repurchase of common stock ........................................................ (3,191) ---
---------- ----------
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities ...................... (1,481) 135,122
---------- ----------
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH ............................................... (184) (98)
---------- ----------
NET INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS .................................. (66,345) 138,676
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning of period ............................................................... 117,664 9,336
---------- ----------
End of period ..................................................................... $ 51,319 $ 148,012
========== ==========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for income taxes ........................................................ $ 78 $ 108
========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
5
ECHELON CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation:
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Echelon Corporation (the "Company"), a Delaware corporation, and its wholly
owned subsidiaries. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated.
While the financial information furnished is unaudited, the condensed
consolidated financial statements included in this report reflect all
adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which the Company
considers necessary for the fair presentation of the results of operations for
the interim periods covered and of the financial condition of the Company at the
date of the interim balance sheet. The results for interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year. The condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2000
included in its Form 10-K.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition and Product Warranty
The Company's revenues are derived from the sale and license of its
products and to a lesser extent, from fees associated with training, technical
support, and custom software design services offered to its customers. Product
revenues consist of revenues from hardware sales and software licensing
arrangements. Revenues from software licensing arrangements accounted for 6.5%
of total revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 and 6.2% for the same
period in 2000, and 8.7% of total revenues for the nine months ended September
30, 2001 and 8.9% for the same period in 2000. Service revenues consist of
product support (including software post-contract support services), training,
and custom software development services.
The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable,
collectibility is probable and there are no post-delivery obligations. For
hardware sales, including sales to distributors, these criteria are generally
met at the time of shipment to the customer. For software licenses, these
criteria are generally met upon shipment to the final end-user. The Company
provides limited post-contract customer support (PCS), consisting primarily of
technical support and "bug" fixes. In accordance with Statement of Position
(SOP) 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition," revenue earned on software
arrangements involving multiple elements is allocated to each element based upon
the relative fair values of the elements. Revenue for the software license
element is recognized at the time of delivery of the application product to the
end-user. The Company uses the residual method to recognize revenue when a
license agreement includes one or more elements to be delivered at a future date
if evidence of the fair value of all undelivered elements exists. If an
undelivered element of the arrangement exists under the license arrangement,
revenue is deferred based on vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair
value of the undelivered element. If vendor-specific objective evidence of fair
value does not exist for all undelivered elements, all revenue is deferred until
sufficient evidence exists or all elements have been delivered. Revenue for the
PCS element, the total amount of which is determined from the stand-alone price
of providing this service, is recognized over the service period. The costs of
providing these services are expensed when incurred. Estimated reserves for
warranty costs as well as reserves for sales returns and allowances related to
anticipated return of products sold to distributors with limited rights of
return, which are not material to the consolidated financial statements, are
recorded at the time of shipment. The Company generally has not had any
significant post-delivery obligations associated with the sale of its products.
Service revenue is recognized as the training services are performed, or ratably
over the term of the support period. In the case of custom software development
services, revenue is recognized when the software has been accepted by the
customer.
6
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
The Company considers bank deposits, money market investments and all debt
and equity securities with an original maturity of three months or less as cash
and cash equivalents. The Company classifies its investments in debt and equity
securities as available-for-sale in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt
and Equity Securities." As of September 30, 2001, the Company's
available-for-sale securities had contractual maturities from three to
twenty-four months and an average maturity of nine months. The fair value of
available-for-sale securities was determined based on quoted market prices at
the reporting date for those instruments. As of September 30, 2001, the
amortized cost basis, aggregate fair value and gross unrealized holding gains by
major security type were as follows (in thousands):
Unrealized
Amortized Aggregate Holding
Cost Fair Value Gains
--------- ---------- ----------
U.S. government securities............................ $ 2,399 $ 2,424 $ 25
U.S. corporate securities:
Corporate notes and bonds........................... 67,122 67,764 642
--------- ---------- ----------
Total investments in debt and equity securities....... $ 69,521 $ 70,188 $ 667
========= ========== ==========
Computation of Net Income/(Loss) Per Share
Net income/(loss) per share has been calculated under SFAS No. 128,
"Earnings per Share." SFAS No. 128 requires companies to compute earnings per
share under two different methods (basic and diluted). Basic net income/(loss)
per share is calculated by dividing net income/(loss) by the weighted average
shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income/(loss)
per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of outstanding
shares assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive stock options and
warrants under the treasury stock method.
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the
basic and diluted net income per share computations for the three months and
nine months ended September 30, 2001 (in thousands):
Three Nine
Months Months
Ended Ended
September September
30, 2001 30, 2001
--------- ---------
Net income/(loss) (Numerator):
Net income/(loss), basic & diluted................ $ 757 $ 817
========= =========
Shares (Denominator):
Weighted average common shares outstanding ....... 38,691 38,479
Weighted average common shares outstanding
subject to repurchase ........................ (43) (43)
--------- ---------
Shares used in basic computation ................. 38,648 38,436
Weighted average common shares outstanding
subject to repurchase ........................ 43 43
Common shares issuable upon exercise of stock
options (treasury stock method) .............. 2,580 2,544
Common shares issuable upon exercise of
warrants (treasury stock method) ............. 260 257
Average unamortized deferred compensation ........ (5) (7)
--------- ---------
Shares used in diluted computation ............... 41,526 41,273
========= =========
Net income/(loss) per share:
Basic ............................................ $ 0.02 $ 0.02
========= =========
Diluted .......................................... $ 0.02 $ 0.02
========= =========
For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2001, and the three
months ended September 30, 2000, stock options in the amount of 2,217,999,
2,034,128, and 263,065, respectively, were not included in the computation of
diluted earnings per share because the options' exercise price was greater than
the average market price of the common shares and therefore, the effect would be
anti-dilutive.
7
For the nine months ended September 30, 2000, no diluted net loss per share
calculation was performed as the inclusion of 4,601,790 potentially dilutive
stock options and warrants would be anti-dilutive.
New Accounting Standards
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 141
("SFAS 141"), "Business Combinations," which supersedes Accounting Principles
Board ("APB") Opinion No. 16, "Business Combinations". SFAS 141 eliminates the
pooling-of-interests method of accounting for business combinations and modifies
the application of the purchase accounting method. The elimination of the
pooling-of-interest method is effective for transactions initiated after
September 30, 2001. The remaining provisions of SFAS 141 will be effective for
transactions accounted for using the purchase method that are completed after
September 30, 2001. The Company believes that the adoption of this Statement
will not have a material impact on its financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
In July 2001, the FASB also issued SFAS No. 142 ("SFAS 142"), "Goodwill and
Intangible Assets," which supersedes APB Opinion No. 17, "Intangible Assets".
Under the new Statement, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives
acquired on or after June 29, 2001 are not amortized, but instead are tested for
impairment annually, primarily using the fair value approach, when there is an
impairment indicator. In addition, SFAS 142 provides that other intangible
assets will continue to be valued and amortized over their estimated lives;
in-process research and development will continue to be written off immediately;
all acquired goodwill will be assigned to reporting units for purposes of
impairment testing and segment reporting; and, effective January 1, 2002,
goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives acquired before June 29,
2001 will no longer be subject to amortization, but will instead be subject to
impairment tests in accordance with the new Statement.
Upon adoption of SFAS 142, on January 1, 2002, the Company will no longer
amortize goodwill, thereby eliminating annual goodwill amortization of
approximately $325,000 based on anticipated amortization for 2002. Goodwill
amortization for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 was approximately
$208,000.
In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144 ("SFAS 144"), "Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets". SFAS 144 supercedes SFAS No.
121 by requiring that one accounting model be used for long-lived assets to be
disposed of by sale, whether previously held and used or newly acquired, and by
broadening the presentation of discontinued operations to include more disposal
transactions. SFAS 144 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2001. The Company has not yet determined the effect SFAS 144 will
have on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
3. Inventories:
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market
and include material, labor and manufacturing overhead. Inventories consist of
the following (in thousands):
September 30, December 31,
2001 2000
------------- ------------
(unaudited)
Purchased materials ........................ $ 5,760 $ 3,599
Work-in-process ............................ 171 10
Finished goods ............................. 9,487 2,136
------------ -------------
$ 15,418 $ 5,745
============ =============
4. Accrued Liabilities:
Accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
September 30, December 31,
2001 2000
------------- -------------
(unaudited)
Accrued payroll and related costs .......... $ 1,358 $ 1,171
Accrued marketing costs .................... 354 367
Other accrued liabilities .................. 390 68
------------ -----------
$ 2,102 $ 1,606
============ ===========
8
5. Segment Disclosure:
In 1998, the Company adopted SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of
an Enterprise and Related Information." Operating segments are defined as
components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is
available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in
deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing business performance. The
Company's chief operating decision-making group is the Executive Staff, which is
comprised of the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, and their
direct reports. SFAS No. 131 also requires disclosures about products and
services, geographic areas and major customers. The adoption of SFAS No. 131 did
not affect results of operations or the financial position of the Company but
did affect the disclosure of segment information.
The Company operates in one principal industry segment: the design,
manufacture and sale of products for the controls network industry, and markets
its products primarily to the building automation, industrial automation,
transportation, and utility/home automation markets. The Company's products are
marketed under the LONWORKS(R) brand name, which provides the infrastructure and
support required to implement and deploy open, interoperable, control network
solutions. All of the Company's products either incorporate or operate with the
Neuron(R) Chip and/or the LONWORKS protocol. The Company also provides services
to customers which consist of technical support and training courses covering
its LONWORKS network technology and products. The Company offers about 90
products and services that together constitute the LONWORKS system. Any given
customer purchases a small subset of such products and services that are
appropriate for that customer's application.
The Company manages its business primarily on a geographic basis. The
Company's geographic areas are comprised of the Americas, Europe, Middle East
and Africa ("EMEA") and Asia Pacific/ Japan ("APJ"). Each geographic area
provides products and services as further described in Item 2, Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The
Company evaluates the performance of its geographic areas based on profit or
loss from operations. Profit or loss for each geographic area includes sales and
marketing expenses and other charges directly attributable to the area and
excludes certain expenses that are managed outside the geographic area. Costs
excluded from area profit or loss primarily consist of unallocated corporate
expenses, comprised of product development costs, corporate marketing costs and
other general and administrative expenses, which are separately managed. The
Company has no long-lived assets, other than property and equipment, goodwill,
and loans to certain key employees. Long-lived assets are attributed to
geographic areas based on the country where the assets are located. As of
September 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000, long-lived assets of about $15.4
million and $4.1 million, respectively, were domiciled in the United States.
Long-lived assets for all other locations are not material to the consolidated
financial statements. Assets and the related depreciation and amortization are
not reported by geography because that information is not reviewed by the
Executive Staff when making decisions about resource allocation to the
geographic areas based on their performance.
9
In North America, the Company sells its products through a direct sales
organization. Outside North America, direct sales, applications engineering and
customer support are conducted through the Company's operations in Europe, Japan
and China. Revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on the country
where the customer is domiciled. Summary information by geography for the
quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 2000 is as follows (in
thousands):
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
---------------------- -----------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
-------- ---------- --------- -----------
Revenues from customers:
Americas ................ $ 4,105 $ 3,907 $ 12,801 $ 11,782
EMEA .................... 10,020 5,678 23,427 17,160
APJ ..................... 3,858 2,422 8,252 6,766
Unallocated ............. -- 202 8 615
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total ............... $ 17,983 $ 12,229 $ 44,488 $ 36,323
======== ======== ======== ========
Gross profit:
Americas ................ $ 2,575 $ 2,392 $ 8,228 7,129
EMEA .................... 4,076 3,289 10,988 9,922
APJ ..................... 2,117 1,491 4,973 4,117
Unallocated ............. -- 202 8 615
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total ............... $ 8,768 $ 7,374 $ 24,197 $ 21,783
======== ======== ======== ========
Income/(Loss) from operations:
Americas ................ $ 1,696 $ 1,560 $ 5,425 $ 4,178
EMEA .................... 3,260 2,489 8,700 7,366
APJ ..................... 1,211 398 2,243 1,139
Unallocated ............. (6,889) (5,107) (21,089) (15,078)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total ............... $ (722) $ (660) $ (4,721) $ (2,395)
======== ======== ======== ========
Products sold to ENEL and its designated manufacturers accounted for 38.3%
of total revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 and 0.2% for the same
period in 2000, and 21.9% of total revenues for the nine months ended September
30, 2001 and 2.2% for the same period in 2000. In addition, EBV, the sole
independent distributor of the Company's products in Europe, accounted for 18.2%
of total revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 and 28.4% for the
same period in 2000, and 22.5% of total revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2001 and 27.7% for the same period in 2000.
6. Income Taxes:
The provision for income taxes for the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2001 includes a provision for Federal, state and foreign taxes
based on the annual estimated effective tax rate applied to the Company and its
subsidiaries for the year. The difference between the statutory rate and the
Company's effective tax rate is primarily due to the beneficial impact of
deferred taxes resulting from the utilization of net operating losses and to the
impact of foreign taxes. Income taxes for the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2000 primarily consist of taxes related to profitable foreign
subsidiaries and various state minimum taxes.
7. Related Party:
In June 2000, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with ENEL
S.p.A., an Italian utility company ("ENEL"). At the same time, the Company also
entered into a research and development agreement with an affiliate of ENEL.
Under the terms of the R&D agreement, the Company will cooperate with ENEL to
integrate LONWORKS technology into ENEL's remote metering management project in
Italy. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2001, the Company has
recognized revenue from products and services sold to ENEL and its designated
manufacturers of approximately $6.9 million and $9.7 million, respectively, $9.5
million of which is included in Accounts Receivable at September 30, 2001.
8. Acquisition:
On February 7, 2001, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital
stock of ARIGO Software GmbH ("ARIGO"), a Beckum, Germany based developer of
LONWORKS hardware and software products. The Company
10
paid cash for the acquisition and has accounted for it using the purchase method
of accounting. Accordingly, results of operations for ARIGO have been included
with those of the Company since the date of acquisition.
9. Stock Repurchase Program:
During the quarter ended September 30, 2001, the Company repurchased
265,000 shares of common stock under the Company's authorized repurchase program
at a cost of $3.2 million. As of September 30, 2001, approximately 1.7 million
shares remained available for repurchase under the program.
11
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The following management's discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations should be read in conjunction with management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.
Overview
We develop, market and support a family of hardware and software products
and services that enables original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, and systems
integrators to design and implement open, interoperable, distributed control
networks. We offer our products and services to OEMs and systems integrators in
the building, industrial, transportation, utility/home and other automation
markets. We provide a variety of technical training courses related to our
products and underlying technology. To assist customers in trouble-shooting
application issues, we provide customer support on a per-incident or annual
contract basis. We also provide custom software development services to our
customers.
We market our products and services in North America, Europe, Japan, South
America and selected Asia-Pacific countries through a direct sales organization
augmented with the use of third-party distributors and systems integrators.
International sales, which include both export sales and sales by international
subsidiaries, accounted for 77.2% of our total revenues for the third quarter of
2001 and 66.4% for the same period in 2000, and 71.2% of total revenues for the
nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 65.9% for the same period in 2000. The
percentage of our revenues denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar,
principally the Japanese yen, was 6.2% for the third quarter of 2001 and 13.5%
for the same period in 2000, and 7.2% of total revenues for the nine months
ended September 30, 2001 and 11.3% for the same period in 2000. However, this
percentage may increase over time as we respond to market requirements to sell
our products and services in local currencies, such as the Euro. As a result,
our operations and the market price of our products may be directly affected by
economic and political conditions in the countries where we do business. We
expect that international sales will continue to constitute a significant
portion of total revenues.
We derive our revenues primarily from the sale and licensing of our
products and, to a lesser extent, from fees associated with training and
technical support offered to our customers. Our product revenues consist of
revenues from sales of transceivers, control modules, routers, network interface
devices and development tools and from licenses of network services software
products. Revenues from software licensing arrangements accounted for 6.5% of
total revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 and 6.2% for the same
period in 2000, and 8.7% of total revenues for the nine months ended September
30, 2001 and 8.9% for the same period in 2000. Our service revenues consist of
product support (including software post-contract support services), training,
and custom software development services. We recognize revenue when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is
fixed or determinable, collectibility is probable and there are no post-delivery
obligations. For hardware sales, including sales to distributors, these criteria
are generally met at the time of shipment to the customer. For software sales,
these criteria are generally met upon shipment to the final end-user. The
Company uses the residual method to recognize revenue when a license agreement
includes one or more elements to be delivered at a future date if evidence of
the fair value of all undelivered elements exists. If an undelivered element of
the arrangement exists under the license arrangement, revenue is deferred based
on vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value of the undelivered
element. If vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value does not exist for
all undelivered elements, all revenue is deferred until sufficient evidence
exists or all elements have been delivered. We record estimated reserves for
warranty costs as well as for sales returns and allowances related to
anticipated return of products sold to distributors with limited rights of
return, at the time we sell the products. We generally have not had any
significant post-delivery obligations associated with the sale of our products.
We recognize service revenues as we perform the services, or ratably over the
term of the support period. In the case of custom software development services,
revenue is recognized when the software has been accepted by the customer.
Although we generated a profit of $757,000 in the third quarter of 2001,
and for the fifth consecutive quarter, we have incurred net losses in all other
periods since our inception. We may not be able to sustain this profitability on
a quarterly or annual basis. We plan to continue to invest heavily in product
development to implement open control networks. Our development projects include
the development of hardware and software products to support the ENEL program,
and the development of transceivers, control modules, routers, network interface
devices
12
network management software, development tools, and the i.LON(TM) 1000 Internet
Server. Furthermore, because our strategy depends significantly on achieving
broad adoption of our LONWORKS technology across many industries worldwide, we
plan to continue to invest heavily in selling and marketing to promote our
products. We currently believe it is unlikely that our future rate of growth of
product development, sales and marketing expenses will fall below their
historical levels. As a result, we will need to significantly increase revenues
over historical levels to sustain profitability in the future. Although our
revenues have grown sequentially year over year, we cannot be certain that this
growth will continue at the same rate, or that our revenues will not decline on
a quarterly or a year over year basis.
Our quarterly and annual results have varied significantly, and we expect
our results to continue to vary. Many of the factors that can cause our results
to vary are outside of our control. For example, our project with ENEL may not
meet target dates, or could be cancelled altogether. In addition, the rates at
which OEMs purchase our products and services can fluctuate. These rates are
affected by the OEMs' own business cycles. Another factor is whether we can
introduce new products in a timely manner. From time to time, we have delayed
introducing new products beyond our projected shipping date. These delays have
increased costs and postponed revenues. Because our future revenues depend on
our ability to introduce new product offerings in a timely manner, any future
delays could harm our business. Our expense levels are based substantially on
the levels of future revenues that we expect to generate. Consequently, if our
revenues are less than we expect, our expense levels could be disproportionately
high as a percentage of total revenues, and our operating results could be
harmed. In the past, we have sometimes failed to meet our expected targets for
revenues. In addition, declines in sales of our existing products over time have
hurt the growth of our revenues.
Results of Operations
Revenues
Total. Total revenues grew to $18.0 million in the third quarter of 2001
from $12.2 million in the third quarter of 2000. Total revenues for the nine
months ended September 30, 2001 grew to $44.5 million from $36.3 million in the
same period in 2000. The 47.1% increase in total revenues between the two
quarters and the 22.5% increase between the two nine months periods was
primarily the result of an increase in product revenues. Products sold to ENEL
and its designated manufacturers accounted for 38.3% of total revenues for the
quarter ended September 30, 2001 and 0.2% for the same period in 2000, and 21.9%
of total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 2.2% for the
same period in 2000. In addition, EBV, the sole independent distributor of our
products in Europe, accounted for 18.2% of total revenues for the quarter ended
September 30, 2001 and 28.4% for the same period in 2000, and 22.5% of total
revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 27.7% for the same
period in 2000.
Product. Product revenues grew to $17.7 million in the third quarter of
2001 from $11.7 million in the third quarter of 2000. Product revenues for the
nine months ended September 30, 2001 grew to $43.0 million from $34.8 million
for the same period in 2000. The 50.4% increase in product revenues between the
two quarters was primarily the result of an increase in sales of products under
the ENEL program. To a lesser extent, the increase was attributable to increases
in sales of control and connectivity products and i.LON products, partially
offset by slight decreases in LonPoint(R) products, development tools, and
network services products. The 23.7% increase in product revenues between the
two nine month periods was primarily the result of an increase in sales of
products under the ENEL program, and to a lesser extent, increased sales of
control and connectivity products, partially offset by slight decreases in
LonPoint and network services products.
Service. Service revenues decreased to $328,000 in the third quarter of
2001 from $491,000 in the third quarter of 2000. Service revenues decreased
slightly to $1.47 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 from
$1.55 million for the same period in 2000. The 33.2% decrease in service
revenues between the two quarters was primarily the result of a decrease in
training revenues. The 4.6% decrease in service revenues between the two nine
month periods was primarily the result of a decrease in training revenues offset
by increases in custom software development and customer support revenues.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of product. Cost of product revenues consists of costs associated with
the purchase of components and subassemblies, as well as allocated labor,
overhead and manufacturing variance costs associated with the packaging,
13
preparation and shipment of products. Cost of product revenues in the third
quarter of 2001 was $8.7 million compared to $4.4 million for the same period in
2000, representing product gross margins of 50.7% for the third quarter of 2001
and 62.2% for the same period in 2000. Cost of product revenues for the nine
months ended September 30, 2001 increased to $18.6 million from $13.1 million in
the same period of 2000 representing product gross margin of 56.9% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2001 and 62.4% for the same period in 2000. The
decline in product gross margin percentage for the two quarters was primarily
the result of shipping quantity volumes of product with lower margins under the
ENEL program, and, to a lesser extent, changes in the mix of other products sold
and fluctuations in overhead spending rates. The change in product gross margin
percentage for the two nine month periods was primarily due to fluctuations in
overhead spending rates as well as the mix of products sold during the two
periods, particularly those products shipped under the terms of our agreement
with ENEL.
Cost of service. Cost of service revenues consists of employee-related
costs as well as direct costs incurred in providing training and customer
support services. Cost of service revenues increased to $518,000 for the third
quarter of 2001 from $422,000 for the comparative period in 2000, an increase of
22.7%, representing service gross margins of (57.9)% for the third quarter of
2001 and 14.1% for the same period in 2000. Cost of service revenues for the
nine months ended September 30, 2001 increased to $1.7 million from $1.5
million, an increase of 19.9%, representing service gross margins of (18.1)% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 6.0% for the same period in 2000.
The decline in service gross margins for both the quarter and nine months was
primarily due to increased personnel costs and reduced service revenues.
Operating Expenses
Product development. Product development expenses consist primarily of
payroll and related expenses for development personnel, expensed material and
facility costs associated with the development of new technologies and products.
Product development expenses for the third quarter of 2001 grew to $4.3 million
from $2.9 million in the third quarter of 2000, representing 24.0% of total
revenues for the third quarter of 2001 and 23.4% of total revenues for the same
period in 2000. Product development expenses for the nine months ended September
30, 2001 increased to $12.2 million from $8.1 million in the same period of
2000, representing 27.4% of total revenues for the nine months ended September
30, 2001 and 22.4% of total revenues for the same period in 2000. This increase
in product development expenses for both the quarter and nine months was
primarily the result of increased personnel and consultant costs, increased
expensed material and depreciation costs, and expenses related to the operation
of Arigo Software GmbH, which we acquired in February 2001.
Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of
payroll and related expenses for sales and marketing personnel, including
commissions to sales personnel, travel and entertainment, advertising and
product promotion and facilities costs associated with our sales and support
offices. Sales and marketing expenses for the third quarter of 2001 decreased to
$3.7 million from $3.8 million in the third quarter of 2000, representing 20.8%
of total revenues for the third quarter of 2001 and 31.1% of total revenues for
the same period in 2000. Sales and marketing expenses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2001 decreased to $11.5 million from $12.0 million in the same
period of 2000, representing 25.8% of total revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2001 and 33.2% of total revenues for the same period in 2000. This
decrease in sales and marketing expenses for both the quarter and nine months
was the result of decreased worldwide personnel and advertising costs partially
offset by increased travel expenses.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses consist
primarily of payroll and related expenses for executive, accounting and
administrative personnel, insurance, professional fees and other general
corporate expenses. General and administrative expenses in the third quarter of
2001 increased to $1.44 million from $1.36 million in the third quarter of 2000,
representing 8.0% of total revenues for the third quarter of 2001 and 11.1% of
total revenues for the same period in 2000. General and administrative expenses
for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 increased to $5.2 million from $4.0
million in the same period in 2000, representing 11.8% of total revenues for the
nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 11.1% of total revenues for the same
period in 2000. This increase in general and administrative expenses for the
nine months was primarily the result of legal fees and the $475,000 settlement
charge related to the Calabrese patent infringement lawsuit, and to a lesser
extent, an increase in our provision for bad debts.
Interest and other income, net
Interest and other income, net primarily reflects interest earned by our
company on cash and short-term investment balances. Interest and other income,
net for the third quarter of 2001 increased to $1.5 million from
14
$826,000 for the comparable period in 2000. Interest and other income, net for
the nine months ended September 30, 2001 increased to $5.6 million from $1.5
million for the same period in 2000. This increase was primarily due to the
higher average balance of invested cash during the comparative periods in 2001.
Provision for income taxes
The provision for income taxes for the quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2001 includes a provision for Federal, state and foreign taxes
based on our annual estimated effective tax rate for the year. The difference
between the statutory rate and our effective tax rate is primarily due to the
impact of foreign taxes and the beneficial impact of deferred taxes resulting
from the utilization of net operating losses. Income taxes for the quarter and
nine months ended September 30, 2000 primarily consist of taxes related to
profitable foreign subsidiaries and various state minimum taxes. Income taxes
were $32,000 for the third quarter of 2001 and $38,000 for the same period in
2000. Income taxes were $34,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 and
$114,000 for the same period in 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since our inception, we have financed our operations and met our capital
expenditure requirements primarily from the sale of preferred stock and common
stock. From inception through September 30, 2001, we raised $265.3 million from
the sale of preferred stock and common stock.
As of September 30, 2001, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments of $121.5 million. Net cash used in operating activities was $12.6
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 compared to $7.1 million
during the same period of 2000. Cash used in 2001 was principally the result of
a planned increase in inventories, increases in accounts receivable and other
current assets, and a decrease in our deferred revenues, partially offset by
increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Cash used in 2000 was
principally the result of a planned increase in inventories, increases in other
current assets and accounts receivable, and the net loss.
Net cash used for investing activities for the nine months ended September
30, 2001 of $52.1 million was principally due to the purchase of
available-for-sale short-term investments, a $5.0 million increase in other
long-term assets, and capital expenditures of $10.7 million. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2000, net cash provided by investing activities of $10.8
million was principally due to the net proceeds from maturities and sales of
available-for-sale investments of $14.5 million, slightly offset by purchases of
available-for-sale short-term investments of $1.8 million, capital expenditures
of $1.2 million, and an increase in other long-term assets of $674,000.
Net cash used for financing activities of $1.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2001 was principally due to the repurchase of common stock,
partially offset by the proceeds received from the exercise of stock options by
employees. For the nine months ended September 30, 2000, net cash provided by
financing activities of $135.1 million was principally due to the purchase of
three million shares of our common stock by ENEL S.p.A in the third quarter of
2000, and to a lesser extent, to the proceeds received from the exercise of
stock options by employees.
We believe that our existing available cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments will satisfy our projected working capital and other cash
requirements for at least the next twelve months. However, in the unlikely event
that we would require additional financing within this period, such financing
may not be available to us in the amounts or at the times that we require, or on
acceptable terms. If we fail to obtain additional financing, when and if
necessary, our business would be harmed.
New Accounting Standards
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 141
("SFAS 141"), "Business Combinations," which supersedes Accounting Principles
Board ("APB") Opinion No. 16, "Business Combinations". SFAS 141 eliminates the
pooling-of-interests method of accounting for business combinations and modifies
the application of the purchase accounting method. The elimination of the
pooling-of-interest method is effective for transactions initiated after
September 30, 2001. The remaining provisions of SFAS 141 will be effective for
transactions accounted for using the purchase method that are completed after
September 30, 2001. We believe that the adoption of this Statement will not have
a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows.
15
In July 2001, the FASB also issued SFAS No. 142 ("SFAS 142"), "Goodwill and
Intangible Assets," which supersedes APB Opinion No. 17, "Intangible Assets".
Under the new Statement, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives
acquired on or after June 29, 2001 are not amortized, but instead are tested for
impairment annually, primarily using the fair value approach, when there is an
impairment indicator. In addition, SFAS 142 provides that other intangible
assets will continue to be valued and amortized over their estimated lives;
in-process research and development will continue to be written off immediately;
all acquired goodwill will be assigned to reporting units for purposes of
impairment testing and segment reporting; and, effective January 1, 2002,
goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives acquired before June 29,
2001 will no longer be subject to amortization, but will instead be subject to
impairment tests in accordance with the new Statement.
Upon adoption of SFAS 142, on January 1, 2002, we will no longer amortize
goodwill, thereby eliminating annual goodwill amortization of approximately
$325,000 based on anticipated amortization for 2002. Goodwill amortization for
the nine months ended September 30, 2001 was approximately $208,000.
In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144 ("SFAS 144"), "Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets". SFAS 144 supercedes SFAS No.
121 by requiring that one accounting model be used for long-lived assets to be
disposed of by sale, whether previously held and used or newly acquired, and by
broadening the presentation of discontinued operations to include more disposal
transactions. SFAS 144 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2001. We have not yet determined the effect SFAS 144 will have on
our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks
We have not experienced any material change in our exposure to interest
rate and foreign currency risks since the date of our Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000.
Interest Rate Risk. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest
rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio. All our investments are in
high-quality issuances, and, by our company policy, are limited in the amount of
credit exposure to any one issuer. We ensure the safety and preservation of the
invested principal funds by investing only in marketable securities with active
secondary or resale markets, which also helps to maintain portfolio liquidity.
The table below presents principal amounts and related weighted average interest
rates for our investment portfolio at September 30, 2001. According to our
policy, all investments mature in two years or less.
Carrying Average
Amount Interest Rate
-------------- -------------
(in thousands)
Cash Equivalents:
U.S. corporate securities ........................ $ 49,435 3.19%
-------- --------
Total cash equivalents ....................... $ 49,435 3.19%
-------- --------
Short-term Investments:
U.S. corporate securities ........................ $ 67,764 5.03%
U.S. government securities ....................... 2,424 3.96%
-------- --------
Total short-term investments ................. $ 70,188 5.03%
-------- --------
Total investment securities .................. $119,623 4.27%
======== ========
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. We transact business in various foreign
countries. Our primary foreign currency cash flows are in Japan. Currently, we
do not employ a foreign currency hedge program utilizing foreign currency
exchange contracts as the foreign currency transactions and risks to date have
not been significant.
Factors That May Affect Future Results of Operations
Interested persons should carefully consider the risks described below in
evaluating Echelon. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us
or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business
operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business,
financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely
affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline.
Our future results could be significantly harmed if our project with ENEL is not
successful.
We have entered into a research and development agreement with an affiliate
of ENEL S.p.A., an Italian utility company, under which we will cooperate with
ENEL to integrate our LONWORKS system into ENEL's
16
remote metering management project in Italy. This project is called "Contratore
Elettronico." We face a number of risks as we undertake this project, including:
. our research and development activities under this project might be
unsuccessful, or might not be commercially exploitable;
. the Contratore Elettronico project might not meet target dates;
. the products we develop for the Contratore Elettronico project might
not yield economic returns; or
. the research and development agreement might be terminated if, among
other things, either party materially breaches its obligations under
the agreement; or
. third parties may contest part or all of the agreement.
If our efforts under this research and development agreement or the related
Contratore Elettronico project are not successful, our revenues and income could
suffer.
We have a history of losses, and we may incur losses in the future.
Although we generated a profit of $757,000 in the third quarter of 2001,
and for the fifth consecutive quarter, we have incurred net losses in all other
periods since our inception. As of September 30, 2001, we had an accumulated
deficit of $93.5 million. We have invested and continue to invest significant
financial resources in product development, marketing and sales. If our revenues
do not increase significantly as a result of these expenditures, we may not be
able to sustain profitability. There is also no guarantee that our profitability
will continue or increase on a quarterly or annual basis. Our future operating
results will depend on many factors, including:
. the growth of the markets for our products, especially utility/home
automation products;
. the acceptance of our products;
. the level of competition that we face;
. our ability to develop and market new products; and
. general economic conditions.
As of December 31, 2000, we had net operating loss carryforwards for
Federal income tax reporting purposes of about $102.0 million and for state
income tax reporting purposes of about $19.6 million, which expire at various
dates through 2020. In addition, as of December 31, 2000, we had tax credit
carryforwards of about $7.2 million, which expire at various dates through 2020.
The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, contains provisions that limit
the use in any future period of net operating loss and credit carryforwards upon
the occurrence of certain events, including a significant change in ownership
interests. We have performed an analysis of our ownership changes and have
reported the net operating loss and credit carryforwards considering such
limitations. We had deferred tax assets, including our net operating loss
carryforwards and tax credits, totaling about $44.2 million as of December 31,
2000. A valuation allowance has been recorded for the entire deferred tax asset
as a result of uncertainties regarding the realization of the asset balance, our
history of losses and the variability of our operating results.
Our limited history and the undetermined market acceptance of our products make
it difficult to evaluate our future prospects.
We have only a limited operating history on which you can base your
evaluation of our business. We face a number of risks as an emerging company in
a new market, and you must consider our prospects in light of these risks. Our
future operating results are difficult to predict due to many factors, including
the following:
. our targeted markets have not yet accepted many of our products and
technologies;
. the nature of our business and markets requires rapid progress;
. potential changes in voluntary product standards can significantly
influence many of the markets for our products; and
. our industry is very competitive.
Fluctuations in our operating results may cause our stock price to decline.
Our quarterly and annual results have varied significantly, and we have
failed to meet securities analysts' expectations in the past. Our future results
may fluctuate and may not meet those expectations in some future period.
17
As a result, the price of our common stock could fluctuate or decline. The
factors that could cause this variability, many of which are outside of our
control, include the following:
. fluctuations in the rates at which OEMs purchase our products and
services;
. OEMs' own business cycles;
. our ability to introduce new products on a timely basis;
. any downturns in any customer's or potential customer's business, or
declines in general economic conditions that cause significant
reductions in their capital spending;
. increased competition;
. market acceptance of our products;
. product life cycles;
. order delays or cancellations;
. changes in the mix of products and services that we sell;
. shipment and payment schedules;
. changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors;
. changes in product distribution; and
. product ratings by industry analysts and endorsement of competing
products by industry groups.
In addition, our expense levels are based, in significant part, on the
future revenues that we expect. Consequently, if our revenues are less than we
expect, our expense levels could be disproportionately high as a percentage of
total revenues.
If our OEMs do not employ our products and technologies, or if we do not
maintain and expand our distribution channels, our revenues could decrease
significantly.
To date, substantially all of our product sales have been to OEMs. The
product and marketing decisions made by OEMs significantly affect the rate at
which our products are used in control networks. We believe that since OEMs in
certain industries receive a large portion of their revenues from sales of
products and services to their installed base, these OEMs have tended to
moderate the rate at which they incorporate LONWORKS technology into their
products. We have attempted to motivate OEMs, as well as systems integrators and
owners of control systems, to transition more rapidly to LONWORKS technology.
Furthermore, OEMs that manufacture and promote products and technologies that
compete or may compete with us may be particularly reluctant to employ our
products and technologies to any significant extent, if at all. We may not be
able to maintain or improve the current rate at which our products are accepted
by OEMs and others, which could decrease our revenues.
Currently, significant portions of our revenues are derived from sales by
EBV, the sole independent distributor of our products to OEMs in Europe. EBV
accounted for 18.2% of total revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2001
and 28.4% of total revenues for the same period in 2000. EBV accounted for 22.5%
of total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 27.7% of
total revenues for the same period in 2000. Our current agreement with EBV
expires in December 2001. In addition, as part of our distribution strategy, we
intend to develop distribution arrangements with systems integrators. In
particular, we expect that a significant portion of our future revenues will be
derived from sales by such systems integrators. If EBV, or any other existing or
future distributor, fails to dedicate sufficient resources and efforts to
marketing and selling our products, our revenues could decrease. If EBV
significantly reduces the stocking levels for our products, both our revenues
and customer service levels would decrease. In that case, we might be required
to add our own pan-European distribution capability to meet the needs of our
customers. Our business will be harmed if we fail to do any of the following:
. develop new distribution channels;
. maintain the EBV arrangement or any other distribution channels; or
. renew the EBV arrangement on a timely basis.
If OEMs fail to develop interoperable products or if our interoperable products
are not accepted by our targeted markets, we may be unable to generate sales of
our products.
Our future operating success will depend, in significant part, on the
successful development of interoperable products by us and OEMs, and the
acceptance of interoperable products by systems integrators and end-users. We
have expended considerable resources to develop, market and sell interoperable
products, and have made such
18
products a cornerstone of our sales and marketing strategy. We have widely
promoted interoperable products as offering benefits such as lower life-cycle
costs and improved flexibility to owners and users of control networks. However,
OEMs that manufacture and market closed systems may not accept, promote or
employ interoperable products, since doing so may expose their businesses to
increased competition. In addition, OEMs might not, in fact, successfully
develop interoperable products, or their interoperable products might not be
accepted by their customers. If OEMs fail to develop interoperable products, or
interoperable products are not accepted by our markets, our revenues will
suffer.
We depend on a limited number of key manufacturers for Neuron Chips and use
contract electronic manufacturers for most of our products requiring assembly.
If any of these manufacturers terminates or decreases its relationships with us,
we may not be able to supply our products and our revenues would suffer.
The Neuron Chip is an important component that our customers use in control
network nodes. In addition, the Neuron Chip is an important device that we use
in many of our products. Neuron Chips are currently manufactured and distributed
by Toshiba and Cypress Semiconductor. We have entered into licensing agreements
with each of Toshiba and Cypress. The agreements, among other things, grant
Toshiba and Cypress the worldwide right to manufacture and distribute Neuron
Chips using technology licensed from us and require us to provide support and
unspecified updates to the licensed technology over the terms of the agreements.
The Cypress agreement expires in April 2009, and the Toshiba agreement expires
in January 2010. While we developed the first version of the Neuron Chip,
Toshiba subsequently developed improved, lower-cost versions of the Neuron Chip
that are presently used in products that our customers and we develop and sell.
We currently have no other source of supply for Neuron Chips and have neither
the resources nor the skills to replace Toshiba or Cypress as a manufacturer of
Neuron Chips. Both Toshiba and Cypress are expected to play a key role in the
development and marketing of LONWORKS technology. If we lose Toshiba or Cypress
as a supplier, we may not be able to locate an alternate source for the design,
manufacture or distribution of Neuron Chips.
Our future success will also depend significantly on our ability to
successfully manufacture our products cost-effectively and in sufficient
volumes. For most of our products requiring assembly, we use contract electronic
manufacturers, including Able Electronics, muRata Electronics, Transpower
Technologies, and WKK Technology. These contract electronic manufacturers
procure material and assemble, test and inspect the final products to our
specifications. This strategy involves certain risks. By using third parties to
manufacture our products, we have reduced control over delivery schedules,
product availability, manufacturing yields, quality and costs. In addition,
contract electronic manufacturers can themselves experience turnover and
instability, exposing us to additional risks as well as missed commitments to
our customers. We will also face risks if and when we transition between
contract electronic manufacturers. For example, we may have to move raw material
and in process inventory between locations in different parts of the world.
Also, we would be required to reestablish acceptable manufacturing processes
with a new work force.
Because we depend on sole or a limited number of suppliers, any shortage or
interruptions of supply would adversely affect our revenues and/or gross
profits.
We currently purchase several key components only from sole or limited
sources. If we experience any shortage of products or components of acceptable
quality, or any interruption in the supply of these products or components, or
if we are not able to procure these products or components from alternate
sources at acceptable prices and within a reasonable period of time, our
revenues and/or gross profits could decrease. In the past, we have sometimes
experienced shortages or supply interruptions of products or components, which
caused us to delay shipments beyond targeted or announced dates.
Our markets are highly competitive. Many of our competitors have longer
operating histories and greater resources than we do. If we are unable to
effectively compete in the industry, our operating results could be harmed.
Competition in our markets is intense and involves rapidly changing
technologies, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions
and rapid changes in customer requirements. To maintain and improve our
competitive position, we must continue to develop and introduce, on a timely and
cost-effective basis, new products, features and services that keep pace with
the evolving needs of our customers. The principal competitive factors that
affect the markets for our control network products include the following:
. our customer service and support;
. our product reputation, quality, and performance; and
19
. the price and features of our products such as adaptability,
scalability, the ability to integrate with other products,
functionality, and ease of use.
In each of our markets, we compete with a wide array of manufacturers,
vendors, strategic alliances, systems developers and other businesses. Our
competitors include some of the largest companies in the electronics industry,
such as Siemens in the building and industrial automation industries,
Allen-Bradley (a subsidiary of Rockwell) and Group Schneider in the industrial
automation industry, and Microsoft. Many of our competitors, alone or together
with their trade associations and partners, have significantly greater
financial, technical, marketing, service and other resources, significantly
greater name recognition and broader product offerings. As a result, these
competitors may be able to devote greater resources to the development,
marketing and sale of their products, and may be able to respond more quickly to
changes in customer requirements or product technology. In addition, those
competitors that manufacture and promote closed, proprietary control systems may
enjoy a captive customer base dependent on such competitors for service,
maintenance, upgrades and enhancements. Most recently, Microsoft has announced a
specification that it refers to as SCP (Simple Control Protocol) which is
targeted at the networking of everyday devices. Microsoft has announced its
intent to focus this capability on home networking applications. Products from
emerging companies such as emWare could also compete with our products,
especially in the utility/home market. Even if we believe that the products
offered by some of these companies do not provide the robust and open networking
solutions offered by LONWORKS networks, we would be required to educate our
customers about what we believe are the potential long-term cost and
functionality problems inherent in such alternative solutions. However, our
customers may believe that these alternative products are satisfactory for their
needs.
Many of our competitors develop, support and promote closed or proprietary
control systems. If we are unable to promote and expand acceptance of open,
interoperable control systems, our revenues and operating results may be harmed.
Many of our current and prospective competitors are dedicated to promoting
closed or proprietary systems, technologies, software and network protocols or
product standards that differ from, or are incompatible with ours. In some
cases, companies have established associations or cooperative relationships to
enhance the competitiveness and popularity of their products, or to promote
these different or incompatible technologies, protocols and standards. For
example, in the building automation market, we face widespread reluctance by
vendors of traditional closed or proprietary control systems, who enjoy a
captive market for servicing and replacing equipment, to use our interoperable
technologies. We also face strong competition by large trade associations that
promote alternative technologies and standards in their native countries, such
as the BatiBus Club International in France and the European Installation Bus
Association in Germany, each of which has over 100 members and licensees. Other
examples include the CEBus Industry Council, which is the proponent of an
alternative protocol to our LONWORKS protocol for use in the utility/home
automation industry, and a group comprised of Asea Brown Boveri, ADtranz AB,
Siemens, GEC Alstrom and other manufacturers that support an alternative rail
transportation protocol to our LONWORKS protocol. Our technologies, protocols or
standards may not be successful in any of our markets, and we may not be able to
compete with new or enhanced products or standards introduced by existing or
future competitors.
We promote an open technology platform that could increase our competition.
LONWORKS technology is open, meaning that many of our technology patents
are broadly licensed without royalties or license fees. As a result, our
customers are capable of developing products that compete with some of our
products. Because some of our customers are OEMs that develop and market their
own control systems, these customers in particular could develop competing
products based on our open technology. This could decrease the market for our
products and increase the competition that we face.
The trading price of our stock has been volatile, and may fluctuate due to
factors beyond our control.
The trading price of our common stock is subject to significant
fluctuations in response to numerous factors, including:
. our quarterly operating results may vary widely;
. our customers or we may announce technological innovations or new
products;
. securities analysts may change their estimates of our financial
results; and
20
. significant stockholders may sell some or all of their holdings of our
stock.
In addition, the market price of securities of technology companies,
especially those in new or emerging industries such as ours, has been very
volatile in the past. This volatility has often been unrelated or
disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. In the
future, our operating results may fall below analysts' expectations, which could
adversely affect the market price of our stock.
In the future, we may be the target of securities class action lawsuits or other
litigation, which could be costly and time consuming to defend.
In the past, following a period of volatility in the market price of a
company's securities, securities class action lawsuits have often been
instituted against such companies. We may in the future be the target of similar
litigation. If such a lawsuit were brought against us, regardless of its
outcome, we would incur substantial costs and our management resources would be
diverted in defending such litigation.
Our executive officers and technical personnel are critical to our business, and
if we lose or fail to attract our key personnel, we may not be able to
successfully operate our business.
Our performance depends substantially on the performance of our executive
officers and key employees. We are dependent in particular on our Chief
Executive Officer, as well as our technical personnel, due to the specialized
technical nature of our business. Our future success will depend on our ability
to attract, integrate, motivate and retain qualified technical, sales,
operations and managerial personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in our
business areas is intense, and we may not be able to continue to attract and
retain qualified executive officers and key personnel necessary to enable our
business to succeed. Our product development and marketing functions are largely
based in Silicon Valley, a highly competitive marketplace. It is particularly
difficult to recruit, relocate and retain qualified personnel in this geographic
area. In addition, if we lose the services of any of our key personnel and are
not able to find replacements in a timely manner, our business could be
disrupted, other key personnel may decide to leave, and we may incur increased
operating expenses in finding and compensating a replacement.
The market for our products is new and rapidly evolving. If we are not able to
develop or enhance products to respond to changing market conditions, our
revenues will suffer.
Customer requirements for control network products can change as a result
of innovations or changes within the building, industrial, transportation,
utility/home and other industries. For example, new or different standards
within industry segments may be adopted, giving rise to new customer
requirements. These customer requirements may or may not be compatible with our
current or future product offerings. Our future success depends in large part on
our ability to continue to enhance existing products, lower product cost and
develop new products that maintain technological competitiveness. We may not be
successful in modifying our products and services to address these requirements
and standards. For example, certain of our competitors may develop competing
technologies based on Internet Protocols (IP) that may have advantages over our
products in remote connection. In addition, from time to time, we have delayed
introducing new products beyond our projected shipping date for such products.
In each instance, these delays increased our costs and delayed our revenues.
Voluntary standards that are established in our markets could limit our ability
to sell our products and reduce our revenues.
Standards bodies, which are formal and informal associations that attempt
to set voluntary, non-governmental product standards, are influential in many of
our target markets. Some of our competitors have attempted to use voluntary
standards to reduce the market opportunity for our products, or to increase the
market opportunity for the competitors' products, by lobbying for the adoption
of voluntary standards that would exclude or limit the use of our products. We
participate in many voluntary standards processes both to avoid adoption of
exclusionary standards and to promote voluntary standards for our products.
However, we do not have the resources to participate in all voluntary standards
processes that may affect our markets. The adoption of voluntary standards that
are incompatible with our products or technology could limit the market
opportunity for our products.
21
As a result of our lengthy sales cycle, we have limited ability to forecast the
amount and timing of specific sales. If we fail to complete or are delayed in
completing transactions, our revenues could vary significantly from period to
period.
The sales cycle between initial customer contact and execution of a
contract or license agreement with a customer can vary widely. OEMs typically
conduct extensive and lengthy product evaluations before making initial
purchases of our products. Subsequent purchases of our products may be delayed
by prolonged product development and introduction periods for OEMs. Attendant
delays in our sales cycle can result from, among other things, changes in
customers' budgets or in the priority assigned to control network development
and the need to educate customers about the potential applications of and cost
savings associated with our products. We generally have little or no control
over these factors, which may cause a potential customer to favor a competitor's
products, or to delay or forgo purchases altogether. Also, there can be long
sales cycles between the selection of our products for use by a systems
integrator, and the purchase of such products by the systems integrator.
Downturns in the control network technology market and related markets may
decrease our revenues and margins.
The market for our products depends on economic conditions affecting the
broader control network technology and related markets. Downturns in these
markets may cause our OEMs and system integrators to delay or cancel projects,
reduce their production or reduce or cancel orders for our products. In this
environment, customers may experience financial difficulty, cease operations or
fail to budget for the purchase of our products. This, in turn, may lead to
longer sales cycles, delays in payment and collection, and price pressures,
causing us to realize lower revenues and margins. In particular, capital
spending in the technology sector has decreased over the past 12 months, and
many of our customers and potential customers have experienced declines in their
revenues and operations. In addition, the terrorist acts of September 11, 2001
and subsequent terrorist activities have created an uncertain economic
environment and we cannot predict the impact of these events, or of any related
military action, on our customers or business. We believe that, in light of
these events, some businesses may curtail or eliminate capital spending on
control network technology. If capital spending in our markets declines, it may
be necessary for us to gain significant market share from our competitors in
order to achieve our financial goals and maintain profitability.
Defects in or misuse of our products may delay our ability to generate revenues
and may increase our liabilities and expenses.
The products that we develop, license and sell may contain errors or
failures or may be improperly installed or implemented. If errors or failures
are found in our products, we may not be able to successfully correct them in a
timely manner, or at all. Such errors or failures may delay our revenue
recognition and divert our engineering resources to correct such defects. In
addition, our products may not be properly installed or implemented by third
parties.
We maintain errors and omissions insurance to cover liability associated
with our operations but it is possible that such insurance may not be available
or may be insufficient in amount to cover any particular claim. During 2000, the
total limit for claims under these policies was $17.0 million. We have since
then reduced the total limit for errors and omissions claims to $2.0 million
because our insurers requested premiums that we believed were excessive. We
believe that insurance premiums for errors and omissions coverage will continue
to increase for the foreseeable future, which could result in increased costs or
reduced limits. We may face increased exposure to these types of claims as a
result of the decrease in our coverage. Although our agreements with our
customers typically contain provisions intended to limit our exposure to
potential claims as well as any liabilities arising from such claims, and may in
very limited instances require that we be named as an additional insured under
the insurance policies carried by some of our customers, such contracts and
insurance may not effectively protect us against the liabilities and expenses
associated with product errors or failures. Accordingly, errors or failures in
our products or applications or improper installation or implementation of our
products by third parties could harm our operating results. In addition, because
of the low cost and interoperable nature of our products, LONWORKS technology
could be used in a manner for which it was not intended. As a result, our
reputation could be harmed and we might suffer material financial losses.
22
We have limited ability to protect our intellectual property rights.
Our success depends significantly upon our intellectual property rights. We
rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws,
non-disclosure agreements and other contractual provisions to establish,
maintain and protect our intellectual property rights, all of which afford only
limited protection. We have 79 issued U.S. patents, 13 pending U.S. patent
applications, and various foreign counterparts. It is possible that patents will
not issue from these pending applications or from any future applications or
that, if issued, any claims allowed will not be sufficiently broad to protect
our technology. If any of our patents fail to protect our technology, our
competitors may find it easier to offer equivalent or superior technology. We
have registered or applied for registration for certain trademarks, and will
continue to evaluate the registration of additional trademarks as appropriate.
If we fail to properly register or maintain our trademarks or to otherwise take
all necessary steps to protect our trademarks, the value associated with the
trademarks may diminish. In addition, if we fail to take all necessary steps to
protect our trade secrets or other intellectual property rights, we may not be
able to compete as effectively in our markets.
Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties
may attempt to copy aspects of our products or services or to obtain and use
information that we regard as proprietary. Any of the patents, trademarks,
copyrights or intellectual property rights that have been or may be issued or
granted to us could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, and any of the
rights granted may not provide protection for our proprietary rights. In
addition, there can be no assurance that we have taken or will take all
necessary steps to protect our intellectual property rights. Third parties may
also independently develop similar technology without breach of our trade
secrets or other proprietary rights. We have licensed in the past and may
license in the future our key technologies to third parties. In addition, the
laws of some foreign countries, including several in which we operate or sell
our products, do not protect proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the
laws of the United States. Certain of our products are licensed under
shrink-wrap license agreements that are not signed by licensees and therefore
may not be binding under the laws of certain jurisdictions.
From time to time, litigation may be necessary to defend and enforce our
proprietary rights. As a result of this litigation, we could incur substantial
costs and divert management resources, which could harm our business, regardless
of the final outcome. Despite our efforts to safeguard and maintain our
proprietary rights both in the United States and abroad, we may be unsuccessful
in doing so. Also, the steps that we take to safeguard and maintain our
proprietary rights may be inadequate to deter infringement, misuse,
misappropriation or independent third-party development of our technology or
intellectual property rights or to prevent an unauthorized third party from
copying or otherwise obtaining and using our products or technology.
Regulatory actions could limit our ability to market and sell our products.
Many of our products and the industries in which they are used are subject
to U.S. and foreign regulation. Government regulatory action could greatly
reduce the market for our products. For example, the power line medium, which is
the communications medium used by some of our products, is subject to special
regulations in North America, Europe and Japan. These regulations limit the
ability of companies in general to use power lines as a communication medium. In
addition, some of our competitors have attempted to use regulatory actions to
reduce the market opportunity for some of our products or to increase the market
opportunity for the competitors' products. In the late 1990's, we experienced
efforts by CEMA, a trade association that developed a competing home automation
protocol, to persuade the FCC to mandate use of its protocol in analog
television and set-top box applications. We were a petitioner in litigation
arising from a related FCC proceeding concerning commercial availability of
these "navigation devices." An appeal under this case was decided in favor of
the government. We decided not to seek Supreme Court review. Although these
specific FCC and judicial proceedings are not a significant threat to our
digital and Internet-based products, existing or future regulations or
regulatory actions could adversely affect the market for our products or require
us to expend significant management, technical or financial resources.
We face operational and financial risks associated with international
operations.
Our sales and marketing operations are located in nine countries. Revenues
from international sales, which include both export sales and sales by
international subsidiaries, accounted for about 77.2% of our total revenues for
the third quarter of 2001 and 66.4% of our total revenues for the same period in
2000, and 71.2% of our total revenues for the nine months ended September 30,
2001 and 65.9% of our total revenues for the same period in 2000. Our operations
and the market price of our products may be directly affected by economic and
political
23
conditions in the countries where we do business. In addition, we may not be
able to maintain or increase the international demand for our products.
Additional risks inherent in our international business activities generally
include the following:
. currency fluctuations;
. unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs and other trade
barriers;
. costs of localizing products for foreign countries and lack of
acceptance of non-local products in foreign countries;
. longer accounts receivable payment cycles;
. difficulties in managing international operations;
. potentially adverse tax consequences, including restrictions on
repatriation of earnings; and
. the burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws.
Differing vacation and holiday patterns in other countries, particularly in
Europe, may also affect the amount of business that we transact in other
countries in any quarter, the timing of our revenues and our ability to forecast
our projected operating results for such quarter. The portion of our revenues
that were conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, principally the
Japanese yen, was about 6.2% for the third quarter of 2001 and 13.5% for the
same period in 2000, and 7.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 and
11.3% for the same period in 2000. Fluctuations in the value of currencies in
which we conduct our business relative to the U.S. dollar could cause currency
translation adjustments. The use of the Euro as the standard currency in
participating European countries may also impact our ability to transact sales
in U.S. dollars. We have agreed with EBV, our European distributor, that upon
notice from EBV, we will sell our products to EBV in Euros rather than U.S.
dollars. We do not know when or if EBV will give such notice. If fewer of our
sales in Europe are transacted in U.S. dollars, we may experience an increase in
currency translation adjustments, particularly as a result of general economic
conditions in Europe as a whole. We do not currently engage in currency hedging
transactions or otherwise cover our foreign currency exposure.
We rely on a continuous power supply to conduct our operations, and California's
current energy crisis could disrupt our operations and increase our expenses.
California is in the midst of an energy crisis that could disrupt our
operations and increase our expenses. In the event of an acute power shortage,
that is, when power reserves for the state of California fall below certain
critical levels, California has on some occasions implemented, and may in the
future continue to implement, rolling blackouts throughout the state. We
currently do not have backup generators or alternate sources of power in the
event of a blackout, and our current insurance does not provide coverage for any
damages we or our customers may suffer as a result of any interruption in our
power supply. If blackouts interrupt our power supply, we would be temporarily
unable to continue operations at our California facilities. Any such
interruption in our ability to continue operations at our facilities could
damage our reputation, harm our ability to retain existing customers and to
obtain new customers, and could result in lost revenue, any of which could
substantially harm our business and results of operations.
Furthermore, the deregulation of the energy industry instituted in 1996 by
the California government has caused power prices to increase. Under
deregulation, utilities were encouraged to sell their plants, which
traditionally had produced most of California's power, to independent energy
companies that were expected to compete aggressively on price. Instead, due in
part to a shortage of supply, wholesale prices have skyrocketed over the past
year. If wholesale prices continue to increase, the operating expenses
associated with our facilities located in California will likely increase which
would harm our results of operations.
Our existing stockholders control a significant percentage of our stock, which
will limit other stockholders' ability to influence corporate matters.
As of October 31, 2001, our directors and executive officers, together with
certain entities affiliated with them, beneficially owned 36.3% of our
outstanding stock.
Under the stock purchase agreement with ENEL, which transaction was
completed September 11, 2000, ENEL purchased 3 million newly issued shares of
our common stock and was granted the right to nominate a director to our Board
of Directors. As a condition to the closing of the stock purchase agreement, our
directors and our chief financial officer agreed to enter into a voting
agreement with ENEL in which each of them agreed to vote the shares
24
of our company's common stock that they beneficially owned or controlled in
favor of ENEL's nominee to our Board of Directors. In addition, under the terms
of the stock purchase agreement, ENEL has agreed to (i) vote (and cause any of
its affiliates that own shares of our common stock to vote) all of its shares in
favor of the slate of director nominees recommended by the Board of Directors,
and (ii) vote (and endeavor to cause any of its affiliates that own shares of
our common stock to vote) a number of shares equal to at least that percentage
of shares voted by all other stockholders for or against any specified matter,
as recommended by the Board of Directors. The specified matters are the election
of accountants, the approval of company options plans, and any proposal by any
of our stockholders (unless the proposal could be prejudicial to ENEL or the
required voting would interfere with ENEL's fiduciary duties to its own
shareholders).
Under the terms of another stock purchase agreement, one other stockholder
that owns less than 0.5% of our outstanding common stock has agreed to vote (i)
all of its shares in favor of the slate of director nominees recommended by the
Board of Directors, and (ii) a number of shares equal to at least that
percentage of shares voted by all other stockholders for or against any given
matter, as recommended by the Board of Directors (except certain matters
relating to certain changes to our charter, liquidations, a sale of our company
or a merger of our company into another entity), as recommended by a majority of
our Board of Directors.
As a result, our directors and executive officers, together with certain
entities affiliated with them, may be able to control substantially all matters
requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of all directors
and approval of certain other corporate matters.
25
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 2. Changes In Securities
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission Of Matters To A Vote Of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports On Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
None.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ECHELON CORPORATION
Date: November 14, 2001 By: /s/ Oliver R. Stanfield
---------------------------------------
Oliver R. Stanfield,
Vice President Finance and Chief Financial
Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
26