UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD
FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-26124
IXYS CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 770140882-5
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
3540 BASSETT STREET
SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA 95054-2704
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (408) 982-0700
PARADIGM TECHNOLOGY, INC.
694 TASMAN DRIVE
MILPITAS, CA 95035
DECEMBER 31, 1998
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [ ]
The number of shares of the Registrant's Common Stock outstanding as of October
31, 1998 was 11,955,684.
INDEX
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets..................... 3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations........... 4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Loss).................................................. 5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows........... 6
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements...... 7
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS....................... 10
PART II OTHER INFORMATION......................................... 14
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS......................................... 14
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES..................................... 17
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS....... 17
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.......................... 18
SIGNATURES......................................................... 20
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
IXYS CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
MARCH 31, SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 1998
-------------- ------------------
(UNAUDITED)
Cash and cash equivalents $10,594 $11,129
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $588 in 1998 and $613 in 1999 10,009 9,981
Inventories 17,103 19,469
Other current assets 168
Deferred income taxes 1,617 1,617
------- -------
Total current assets 39,323 42,364
Property and equipment, net 10,602 11,904
Goodwill and other intangible assets 5,557
Other 1,143 709
Deferred income taxes 3,272 2,672
------- -------
Total assets $54,340 $63,206
======= =======
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current portion, capital leases $ 428 $ 734
Current portion, long term debt 4,168 4,578
Current portion, mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock 9,300
Accounts payable 4,474 5,738
Other accrued liabilities 7,119 9,085
------- -------
Total current liabilities 25,489 20,135
Long term capital leases 814 1,477
Long term debt 6,624 7,801
Pension obligations 5,113 5,755
------- -------
Total liabilities 38,040 35,168
------- -------
Mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock 28,256
Common stock, $0.01 par value:
Issued and outstanding: 4,176,879 in 1998 and 11,955,670 in 1999 42 120
Additional paid-in capital 1,031 43,281
Notes receivable from employees (936) (936)
Cumulative translation adjustment (734) 279
Accumulated deficit (11,359) (14,706)
------- -------
Total mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock
and stockholders' equity 16,300 28,038
------- -------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $54,340 $63,206
======= =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
3
IXYS CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
----------------------- ---------------------
1997 1998 1997 1998
------- ------- ------- -------
Net revenues...................................... $13,965 $16,449 $27,211 $32,717
Cost of goods sold................................ 9,054 10,629 17,382 22,076
------- ------- ------- -------
Gross profit................................... 4,911 5,820 9,829 10,641
------- ------- ------- -------
Operating expenses:
Research, development and engineering.......... 762 1,366 1,494 2,094
Selling, general and administrative............ 2,196 2,396 4,383 4,693
Acquisition of in-process research and
development................................. 5,807 5,807
------- ------- ------- -------
Total operating expenses..................... 2,958 9,569 5,877 12,594
------- ------- ------- -------
Operating income............................. 1,953 (3,749) 3,952 (1,953)
Other income (expense), net....................... 69 82 (13) 99
------- ------- ------- -------
Income (loss) before income tax provision.... 2,022 (3,667) 3,939 (1,854)
Income tax provision.............................. 1,054 813 1,922 1,493
------- ------- ------- -------
Net income (loss)................................. $ 968 $(4,480) $ 2,017 $(3,347)
======= ======= ======= =======
Net income (loss) per share - basic............... $ 0.26 $ (0.94) $ 0.54 $ (0.75)
======= ======= ======= =======
Number of shares used in per share calculation -
basic............................................. 3,778 4,766 3,762 4,472
======= ======= ======= =======
Net income (loss) per share - diluted............... $ 0.08 $ (0.94) $ 0.17 $ (0.75)
======= ======= ======= =======
Number of shares used in per share calculation -
diluted........................................... 11,820 4,766 11,795 4,472
======= ======= ======= =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
4
IXYS CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------------- -----------------------
1997 1998 1997 1998
------ ------- ------ -------
Net income (loss)................................. $ 968 $(4,480) $2,017 $(3,347)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments...... 68 204 (83) 606
------ ------- ------ -------
Comprehensive income (loss)....................... $1,036 $(4,276) $1,934 $(2,741)
====== ======= ====== =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
5
IXYS CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
SIX MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------------------------
1997 1998
--------------- ----------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) 2,017 $ (3,347)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 531 1,079
Other (49) (870)
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory (284) 1,483
Loss (gain) on foreign currency translation 155 962
Acquisition of in-process research and development 5,807
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (732) 1,725
Inventories 433 (2,542)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (506) 73
Other assets (112) (25)
Accounts payable 256 (1,354)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 1,874 (417)
Pension liabilities 67 (260)
------- -------
Net cash provided by operating activities 3,650 2,314
------- -------
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Acquisition of Paradigm Technology, Inc., net of cash acquired (606)
Purchase of plant and equipment (767) (1,236)
------- -------
Net cash used in investing activities (767) (1,842)
------- -------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from capital lease obligations 991
Principal payments on capital lease obligations (156) (225)
Repayment of notes payable to bank (305)
Other, net 4
------- -------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (156) 465
------- -------
Effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash (281) (402)
equivalents
------- -------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 2,446 535
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 8,231 10,594
------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $10,667 $11,129
======= =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
6
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. INTERIM FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED):
The unaudited financial statements for the quarters ended September 30,
1997 and 1998 have been prepared on the same basis as the audited financial
statements and, in the opinion of management, include all material
adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a
fair presentation of financial position and results of operations in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Although certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles have been omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), the Company (as
defined in Note 7) believes the disclosures made are adequate to make the
information presented not misleading. It is suggested that the
accompanying financial statements be read in conjunction with the
Company's annual financial statements for the year ended March 31, 1998
which have been included in Paradigm Technologies, Inc.'s Form S-4 filed
with the Commission (see Note 7).
The Company's balance sheet as of March 31, 1998 was derived from the
Company's audited financial statements, but does not include all
disclosures necessary for the presentation to be in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles.
2. FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION:
The local currency is considered to be the functional currency of the
operations of IXYS GmbH. Accordingly, assets and liabilities are
translated at the exchange rate in effect at year-end and revenues and
expenses are translated at average rates during the year. Adjustments
resulting from the translation of the accounts of IXYS GmbH into U.S.
dollars are included in cumulative translation adjustment, a separate
component of stockholders' equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and
losses are included as a component of other income and expense.
3. EARNINGS PER SHARE:
The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
128 (SFAS 128), "Earnings per Share," which is effective for all periods
ending after December 15, 1997. SFAS 128 requires dual presentation of
basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) for complex capital structures
on the face of the Statement of Operations. Basic EPS is computed by
dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution
from the exercise or conversion of other securities into common stock. For
the three months and six months ended September 30, 1998, common equivalent
shares from restricted stock, stock options, warrants and preferred stock
have been excluded from the computation as their effect is antidilutive.
4. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 131 (SFAS 131), "Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information". This Statement
establishes standards for disclosure about operating segments in annual
financial statements and selected information in interim financial reports.
It also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and
services, geographic areas and major customers. This Statement supersedes
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 14, "Financial Reporting
for Segments of a Business Enterprise." The new standard becomes effective
for the Company's fiscal year 1999 and requires that comparative
information from earlier years be restated to conform to the requirements
of this standard. The Company is evaluating the requirements of SFAS 131
and the effects, if any, on the Company's current reporting and
disclosures.
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 133), which establishes
accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging
activities. SFAS 133 requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as
either assets or liabilities in the balance sheets and
7
measure those instruments at fair value. This Statement becomes effective
for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1999. The
Company is evaluating the requirements of SFAS 133 and the effects, if any,
on the Company's current reporting and disclosures.
5. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
Effective in the first quarter of 1998, the Company has adopted Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income"
(SFAS 130). Comprehensive income generally represents all changes in
stockholders' equity except those resulting from investments or
contributions by stockholders. The Company has reclassified earlier
financial statements for comparative purposes. The only component of
comprehensive income for the three months and six months ended September
30, 1997 and 1998 was the change in the cumulative translation adjustment.
6. INVENTORIES:
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
MARCH 31, SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 1998
------- -------------
Raw materials $ 3,789 $ 4,098
Work in process 12,059 12,530
Finished goods 5,765 9,250
------- -------
21,613 25,878
Less inventory reserve (4,510) (6,409)
------- -------
$17,103 $19,469
======= =======
7. ACQUISITION AND MERGER:
Effective September 23, 1998, IXYS Corporation ("IXYS") merged with
Paradigm Technology, Inc. ("Paradigm"), a company that designs and markets
fast SRAM products, in a transaction accounted for as a reverse merger. In
the merger, Paradigm issued 11,513,821 shares of its common stock in
exchange for all outstanding shares of IXYS capital stock. At the
conclusion of the merger, IXYS stockholders held approximately 96% of the
combined company. In the merger, the historic accounting records of IXYS
became those of the combined company and, accordingly, Paradigm changed its
name to IXYS (the combined company of which is referred to in this filing
as the "Company" or the "Registrant").
8
The purchase price for Paradigm, consisting of the value of Paradigm common
stock outstanding at the date of the merger, costs incurred by IXYS and the
Paradigm liabilities assumed, has been allocated to Paradigm's tangible and
intangible assets based on relative fair values as follows:
Current assets $ 484
Fixed assets 810
In-process research and development 5,807
Other intangibles 1,463
Goodwill 4,094
-------
$12,658
=======
The goodwill and other intangible assets recorded as part of the purchase
price allocation, in the total amount of approximately $5.6 million, will
be amortized over twenty-four months. The value of the in-process research
development acquired in the transaction, in the amount of $5.8 million, was
recorded as an expense immediately following the transaction as the
products under development had not reached technological feasibility and
there was no other alternative future use for the costs incurred.
In conjunction with the merger, all outstanding shares of mandatorily
redeemable convertible preferred stock were converted to common stock and
the carrying value of $37,556,000 has been reclassified as stockholders'
equity.
8. COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated as follows (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------- ---------------------
1997 1998 1997 1998
------- ------- -------- --------
Basic:
Weighted-average common shares.... 3,778 4,766 3,762 4,472
======= ======= ======= =======
Net income (loss)................. $ 968 $(4,480) $ 2,017 $(3,347)
======= ======= ======= =======
Net income (loss) per share....... $ 0.26 $ (0.94) $ 0.54 $ (0.75)
======= ======= ======= =======
Diluted:
Weighted-average common shares... 3,778 4,766 3,762 4,472
Restricted stock subject to
repurchase................... 417 434
Common equivalent shares from
stock options and warrants... 1,181 1,155
Common equivalent shares from
preferred stock............. 6,444 6,444
------- ------- ------- -------
Shares used in per share
calculation..................... 11,820 4,766 11,795 4,472
------- ------- ------- -------
Net income (loss)................ $ 968 $(4,480) $ 2,017 $(3,347)
======= ======= ======= =======
Net income (loss) per share...... $ 0.08 $ (0.94) $ 0.17 $ (0.75)
======= ======= ======= =======
9
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Discussion contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties, including without limitation as detailed
and included in the report of Paradigm Technology, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("Paradigm") (Registration no. 333-57003) on Form S-4 (the
"Form S-4"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission"), which includes the IXYS financial statements as of March 31,
1998 and 1997 and the three years in the period ended March 31, 1998.
Actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the
forward-looking statements. Important factors affecting the Company's
(as defined below) ability to achieve future revenue growth include
whether, and the extent to which, demand for the Company's products
increases and reflects real end-user demand; whether customer cancellations
and delays of outstanding orders increase; and whether the Company is able
to manufacture in a correct mix to respond to orders on hand and new orders
received in the future; whether the Company is able to achieve its new
product development and introduction goals, including, without limitation,
goals for recruiting, retaining, training, and motivating engineers,
particularly design engineers, and goals for conceiving and introducing
timely new products that are well received in the marketplace; and whether
the Company is able to successfully commercialize its new technologies,
which it has been investing in by designing and introducing new products
based on these new technologies.
Other important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those predicted include overall economic conditions, such
as the economic issues affecting Asian countries; fluctuations in currency
exchange ratios as the Company sells products in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar; demand for electronic products and semiconductors generally;
demand for the end-user products for which the Company's semiconductors
are suited; the level of utilization of the Company's production capacity;
timely availability of, and changes in the cost of, raw materials,
equipment, supplies and services; unanticipated manufacturing problems;
problems in obtaining products from outside foundries that manufacture for
the Company; increases in production and engineering costs associated with
initial manufacture of new products; technological and product development
risks; competitors' actions; and other risk factors described in the
Company's filings with the Commission and in particular the risk factors
described in the Form S-4 regarding "Risks Relating to the Business of
IXYS" and "Risks Relating to the Business of Paradigm - Litigation" and "-
Declining SRAM Prices."
The impact of these and other factors on the Company's revenues and
operating results in any future period cannot be forecasted with certainty.
The Company's expense levels are based, in part, on its expectations as to
future revenues. Because the Company's sales are generally made pursuant
to purchase orders that are subject to cancellation, modification, quantity
reduction or rescheduling on short notice and without significant
penalties, the Company's backlog as of any particular date may not be
indicative of sales for any future period, and such changes could cause the
Company's net sales to fall below expected levels. If revenue levels are
below expectations, operating results are likely to be materially adversely
effected. Net income, if any, and gross margins may be disproportionately
affected by a reduction in net sales because a proportionately smaller
amount of the Company's expenses varies with its revenues.
All forward-looking statements included in this document are made as of the
date hereof, based on the information available to the Company as of the
date hereof, and the Company assumes no obligation to update any forward-
looking statement.
OVERVIEW
On September 23, 1998, IXYS Corporation, a Delaware corporation
("IXYS") merged with Paradigm in a transaction accounted for as a reverse
merger. In the merger, the historic accounting records of IXYS became those of
the combined company, and, accordingly, Paradigm formally changed its name to
"IXYS Corporation" (the combined company of which is referred to in this report
as the "Company" or the "Registrant").
The Company designs, develops and markets power semiconductors used
primarily in controlling energy in motor drives, power conversion (including
uninterruptible power supplies ("UPS") and switch mode power supplies ("SMPS"))
and medical electronics. The Company's power semiconductors convert electricity
at relatively high
10
voltage and current levels to create efficient power as required by a specific
application. The Company's target market includes segments of the power
semiconductor market that require medium to high power semiconductors, with a
particular emphasis on higher power semiconductors, which the Company considers
to be those capable of processing greater than 500 watts of power. The Company
offers a broad line of power semiconductors, including power MOSFETs, insulated
gate bipolar transistors ("IGBTs"), thyristors (silicon controlled rectifiers or
"SCRs") and rectifiers, including fast recovery epitaxial diodes ("FREDs"). In
addition, the Company also designs and markets high speed, high density static
random access memory ("SRAM") semiconductor devices to meet the needs of
advanced telecommunications devices, networks, workstations, high performance
PCs, advanced modems and complex military/aerospace applications.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Sales: Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 1998
were $16.4 million, an increase of 17.8% from the $14.0 million reported in the
three months ended September 30, 1997. For the first six months of fiscal 1999,
net sales of $32.7 million were $5.5 million, or 20.2% higher than for the same
period in fiscal 1998. Unit sales volume for the three months ended September
30, 1998 and for the year to date period increased over the same periods in the
prior year and the effect on revenue was offset partially by declines in average
selling prices. Future revenue will depend largely upon customer demand, unit
shipments and production volumes.
Gross Profit. Gross margin was 35.4% of net sales for the three
months ended September 30, 1998 and was relatively unchanged as compared with
35.2% for the three months ended September 30, 1997. Gross margin was 32.5% of
net sales for the six months ended September 30, 1998 as compared to 36.1% for
the six-month period ended September 30, 1997. The decline in gross margin for
the six month period ended September 30, 1998 as compared to the same period in
1997 was due to lower average selling prices per unit.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses increased
$604,000 in the three months ended September 30, 1998, compared to the same
period in 1997. Research and development expenses increased $600,000 in the six
months ended September 30, 1998, compared to the same period in 1997. Research
and development expenses increased primarily due to expanded research efforts to
support the Company's overall plan.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and
administrative expenses increased $200,000 in the three months ended September
30, 1998, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased $310,000 in the six months ended
September 30, 1998, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. The
increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily related
to increased selling costs on the higher revenues. The Company anticipates that
operating expenses will fluctuate in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net
sales as headcount is modified to support new product introductions, and due to
changes in levels of production volume and unit shipments.
Acquisition of in-process research and development. The Company
recorded a one-time charge of $5.8 million in connection with the acquisition of
Paradigm.
Other Income, Net. Net other income increased $13,000 during the
three months ended September 30, 1998, compared to the same period in fiscal
1998, and $112,000 during the six months ended September 30,1998, compared to
the same period in fiscal 1998.
Provision for Income Taxes. For the three months ended September 30,
1998, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $813,000 on a loss of
$3.7 million, after giving effect to the write-off of the one-time charge of
$5.8 million in connection with the reverse merger acquisition of Paradigm, as
compared to an effective income tax rate of 52% for the three months ended
September 30, 1997 and 49% for the six months ended September 30, 1997. The tax
provision for the three months ended September 30, 1998 gives effect to the non-
deductible tax items relating to the acquisition of Paradigm. The income tax
provision for the six months ended September 30, 1998 reflects the Company's
expected effective tax rate for fiscal year 1999, prior to the effect of the
write-off of the one-time non-deductible charge of $5.8 million in connection
with the reverse merger acquisition of Paradigm, of approximately 38%.
11
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company has financed its operations to date through the private
sale of equity, lease financing, and bank borrowings. As of September 30, 1998,
cash and cash equivalents were $11.1 million, an increase of $535,000 from cash
and cash equivalents of $10.6 million at March 31, 1998. The increase in cash
and cash equivalents was primarily due to cash generated from operations.
Line of credit facilities available to the Company are as follows: A
line of credit with a U.S. bank that as of September 30, 1998 consists of a $5.0
million commitment amount which is available through August 1999. The line bears
interest at the bank's prime rate (8.5% at September 30, 1998). The line is
collateralized by certain assets and contains certain general and financial
covenants, which include provisions stating that the Company cannot incur
additional debt or pledge assets without the prior approval of such bank. At
September 30, 1998, the Company had drawn $2.1 million against such line of
credit.
As of March 31, 1998, the Company had cash deposits with a financial
institution in the amount of $950,000, which is restricted as to use and
represents compensating balances on future discounted acceptances and letters of
credit.
The accounts receivable at September 30, 1998 were relatively
unchanged from March 31, 1998. The inventories at September 30, 1998 were 13.8%
greater than the inventories at March 31, 1998 as a consequence of expectations
for increased orders deliverable during the period. Net plant and equipment at
September 30, 1998 increased 12.2% as compared to March 31, 1998.
The Company evaluates the acquisition of businesses, products or
technologies that complement the Company's business. Any such transactions, if
consummated, may use a portion of the Company's working capital or require the
issuance of equity securities, which may result in further dilution to the
Company's stockholders.
The Company believes that cash generated from operations, if any, and
banking facilities will be sufficient to meet its cash requirements through
fiscal 1999. To the extent that funds generated from operations, together with
bank facilities are insufficient to meet its capital requirements, the Company
will be required to raise additional funds. No assurance can be given that
additional financing will be available or, if available, that it will be
available on acceptable terms. The lack of such financing, if needed, would have
a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and
results of operations.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131 (SFAS 131), "Disclosures
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information". This Statement
establishes standards for disclosure about operating segments in annual
financial statements and selected information in interim financial reports. It
also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services,
geographic areas and major customers. This Statement supersedes Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 14, "Financial Reporting for Segments of a
Business Enterprise." The new standard becomes effective for the Company's
fiscal year 1999 and requires that comparative information from earlier years be
restated to conform to the requirements of this standard. The Company is
evaluating the requirements of SFAS 131 and the effects, if any, on the
Company's current reporting and disclosures.
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 133), which establishes accounting and
reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS 133
requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or
liabilities in the balance sheets and measure those instruments at fair value.
This Statement becomes effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 1999. The Company is evaluating the requirements of SFAS 133
and the effects, if any, on the Company's current reporting and disclosures.
12
Effective in the first quarter of 1998, the Company has adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive
Income" (SFAS 130). Comprehensive income generally represents all changes in
stockholders' equity except those resulting from investments or contributions by
stockholders. The Company has reclassified earlier financial statements for
comparative purposes. The only component of comprehensive income for the three
months and six months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998 was the change in the
cumulative translation adjustment.
YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
The Company has reviewed both its internal computer systems and its
products that could be affected by the "Year 2000" issue and has identified
certain minor software applications that will be affected. In the ordinary
course of replacing computer equipment and software, the Company attempts to
obtain replacements that are Year 2000 compliant. Utilizing both internal and
external resources to identify and assess needed Year 2000 remediation, the
Company currently anticipates that its internal Year 2000 identification,
assessment, remediation and testing efforts, will be completed on or about March
31, 1999, and that such efforts will be completed prior to any currently
anticipated impact on its internal computer equipment and software.
The Company presently believes, with modification to existing
software and conversion to new software, the "Year 2000" issues relating to
internal computer systems and products will not cause significant operational
problems or computer problems. Furthermore, the cost of implementing these
solutions is not anticipated to be material to the financial position or results
of operations. The plan is currently expected to result in non-recurring
expenses over the next 1-1/2 years of approximately $750,000 in the aggregate.
However, if such modifications and conversions are not made, or not completed,
the Company does not expect the "Year 2000" issue to have a material adverse
impact on the operations of the Company as there are inexpensive alternatives
available. Although the Company has completed its internal assessment of the
Year 2000 issue and believes that it is substantially compliant, there can be no
assurance that all potential problem areas have been identified and the Year
2000 risks accurately assessed. Should there be systems that were not included
in the assessment and which are not Year 2000 compliant or should the Company's
assessment prove to be in error in some material respect, the Company may be
unable to conduct business or manufacture its products, which could cause a
material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations.
The Company has initiated formal communications with all of its
significant suppliers during fiscal 1999 to determine the extent to which the
Company is vulnerable to those third parties failure to remediate their own
"Year 2000" issues. There can be no guarantee that the systems or products of
other companies or significant suppliers will be converted. A failure to convert
by another company, or a conversion that is incompatible with the Company's
systems may have a material adverse impact on the Company.
The Company's suppliers and customers may be adversely affected by
their respective failure to address the Year 2000 problem. Should any of the
Company's suppliers encounter Year 2000 problems that cause them to delay
manufacturing or shipments of key components, the Company may be forced to delay
or cancel shipments of its products, which would have a material adverse effect
on the Company's results of operations. Additionally, any inability of material
customers to become Year 2000 compliant, which would cause them to delay or
cancel substantial purchase orders or delivery of products, would also have a
material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. The Company is
currently working with its suppliers to address their Year 2000 compliance in a
timely manner. The Company anticipates completion of this effort by June 1999;
however, there can be no assurance that any such effort will be successful.
Currently, the Company does not have a Year 2000 contingency plan in
place as it has completed its internal assessment and believes that it is
substantially compliant. However, the Company intends to create such a
contingency plan by July 1999 if its communications with its suppliers indicate
such is advisable.
13
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On August 12, 1996, the Company and Michael Gulett, Robert McClelland,
Richard A. Veldhouse and Chiang Lam (the "Paradigm Defendants") were named,
along with PaineWebber, Inc., as defendants in a purported class action
(entitled Bulwa et al. v. Paradigm Technology, Inc. et al., Santa Clara County
Superior Court Case No. CV759991) brought on behalf of stockholders who
purchased the Company's stock between November 20, 1995 and March 22, 1996 (the
"Class Period").
The complaint asserted six causes of action against the Paradigm
Defendants: negligent misrepresentation, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty,
violations of California Corporations Code sections 25400 and 25500 ("Sections
25400 and 25500"), violation of Corporations Code section 1507, and violation of
California Civil Code sections 1709 and 1710.
The Paradigm Defendants responded to the complaint by filing a demurrer
which challenged the legal sufficiency of all six causes of action. On December
12, 1996, the Court sustained the demurrer as to all of the causes of action
except for the fourth cause of action for violation of Sections 25400 and 25500
(and as to all causes of action for defendant Michael Gulett). The Court,
however, granted plaintiffs leave to amend the complaint to attempt to cure the
defects which caused the Court to sustain the demurrer. Plaintiffs failed to
amend within the allotted time and independently expressed an intent to
prosecute only the fourth cause of action. On January 8, 1997, the Paradigm
Defendants, with the exception of Michael Gulett (who by virtue of the ruling on
the demurrer has obtained a dismissal with prejudice as to all causes of action
asserted against him), filed an answer to the complaint denying any liability
for the acts and damages alleged by the plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs have since served the Paradigm Defendants with discovery
requests for production of documents and interrogatories, to some of which the
Paradigm Defendants have responded. Plaintiffs have also subpoenaed documents
from various third parties. The Paradigm Defendants have served the plaintiffs
with an initial set of discovery requests, to which plaintiffs have responded.
The Paradigm Defendants also took the depositions of the named plaintiffs on
April 9, 1997.
On January 15, 1997, plaintiffs filed a motion to certify the matter as a
class action. Plaintiffs sought by their motion to certify a nationwide class of
those who purchased the Company's stock during the Class Period. After several
hearings and continuances, on February 9, 1998 the Court certified a class
consisting only of California purchasers of the Company's stock during the Class
Period.
On April 9, 1998, the court granted plaintiffs' motion to amend their
complaint to incorporate factual allegations derived from the Campbell, et al.
action described below. The court overruled the Paradigm Defendants' demurrer to
the amended complaint on August 6, 1998. The Paradigm Defendants filed an answer
to the amended complaint on August 27, 1998. There can be no assurance that the
Company will be successful in the defense of this action. If
14
unsuccessful in the defense of any such claim, the Company's business, operating
results and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
On February 21, 1997, an additional purported class action, with causes of
action and factual allegations essentially identical to those of the Bulwa, et
al. action, was filed by the law firm of Stull, Stull & Brody in the Santa Clara
County Superior Court on behalf of stockholders who held the Company's stock
between November 20, 1995 and March 22, 1996. The action is entitled Chai, et
al. v. Paradigm Technology Inc. et al. (Case No. CV764259), and is asserted
against the same Paradigm Defendants as in the Bulwa, et al. action,
PaineWebber, Inc. and Smith Barney. Prior to the hearing on the Paradigm
Defendants' demurrer to the initial complaint, plaintiff amended its complaint
to incorporate factual allegations derived from the Campbell, et al. action
described below. The Paradigm Defendants filed a demurrer to the amended
complaint, which was heard on September 9, 1997.
On September 10, 1997, the Court issued an order sustaining the Paradigm
Defendants' demurrer as to all causes of action without leave to amend. A
judgment in favor of the Paradigm Defendants dismissing the entire complaint was
entered by the Court on September 23, 1997. Plaintiff appealed the decision, and
oral argument on the appeal was heard on October 8, 1998. As of the date
hereof, the appeal court has not issued an opinion on the matter. There can be
no assurance that the Company will be successful in defeating the appeal. If
unsuccessful in defeating the appeal, the Company's business, operating results
and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
On May 19, 1997, Thomas Campbell, James Zulliger and Mark Wagenhals, former
employees of the Company, filed an action (Campbell, et al. v. Paradigm
Technology, Inc., et al., Case No. CV766271) in Santa Clara County Superior
Court. The complaint named as defendants the Company, Michael Gulett, Richard
Veldhouse, Dennis McDonald and Chiang Lam. The Campbell plaintiffs filed with
the complaint a notice that they considered their case related legally and
factually to the Bulwa action discussed above. The Campbell complaint contained
causes of action for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, violations of California
Corporations Code sections 25400-25402, 25500-25502 and 25504 and violation of
California Civil Code sections 1709-1710. The Campbell complaint alleged that
the defendants misled them and committed fraud by allegedly overstating the
Company's back orders in the fourth quarter of 1995 and inflated reported sales
in the fourth quarter of 1995 and the first quarter of 1996, which allegedly
resulted in distorting the Company's financial condition, which allegedly
inflated its stock price. Plaintiffs alleged that they purchased the Company's
stock at the allegedly inflated prices and were damaged thereby. The complaint
sought an unspecified amount of compensatory, rescissory and/or punitive
damages. Defendants responded to the complaint on September 12, 1997 by filing
a demurrer as to all causes of action. Prior to the hearing on the demurrer,
plaintiffs amended their complaint to identify two allegedly fraudulent sale
transactions. Defendants filed a demurrer as to all causes of action in the
amended complaint, which was heard on April 2, 1998. That same day, the Court
issued its order sustaining the demurrer on multiple grounds, but granted
plaintiffs leave to amend the complaint by May 15, 1998. Defendants filed a
demurrer in response to the second amended complaint, which was heard on
September 3, 1998. That same day, the Court sustained the demurrer but granted
plaintiffs leave to file a third amended complaint by September 30, 1998.
Plaintiffs then filed a third amended
15
complaint. Following defendants' filing of a demurrer to the third amended
complaint, plaintiffs agreed to dismiss their claims with prejudice in exchange
for defendants' agreement not to seek to recover defendants' costs incurred in
defending against the action.
On May 19, 1998, the law firm that filed the Bulwa, et al. action described
above filed an additional securities class action lawsuit against the Company,
Michael Gulett, Robert McClelland, Richard A. Veldhouse and Chiang Lam, this
time in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California. The complaint alleged violations of section 10(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), the Commission Rule 10b-5
and section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. Plaintiff alleged the same class and the
same substantive factual allegations that are contained in the Bulwa, et al.
action as amended. Defendants responded to the complaint on July 27, 1998 by
filing a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state claims upon which
relief can be granted and for various pleading inadequacies. In lieu of opposing
the motion, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. Defendants' motion to
dismiss the first amended complaint is scheduled for hearing on December 18,
1998. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in the
defense of this action. If unsuccessful in the defense of any such claim, the
Company's business, operating results and cash flows could be materially
adversely affected.
16
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(a) Following approval by the stockholders of Paradigm at the 1998 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders (including adjournments) (the "Annual Meeting"),
the Company's common stock was reclassified to effectuate a fifteen for one
reverse stock split (the "Reverse Stock Split") (such that for every
fifteen (15) shares of the Company's common stock held by a stockholder,
such holder became entitled to one (1) share of Company's common stock,
outstanding warrants and options to purchase stock being adjusted
accordingly).
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
(a) The Annual Meeting commenced on August 4, 1998 and adjourned to August 26,
1998, September 3, 1998, and September 10, 1998.
(b) At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders (i) approved the issuance of
Company common stock in connection with the reverse merger transaction (the
"Merger") between Paradigm and IXYS (the "Issuance Proposal"), (ii)
approved the Reverse Stock Split (the "Reverse Stock Split Proposal"),
(iii) approved the increase in the number of authorized shares of common
stock from 25,000,000 to 40,000,000 (the "Increased Authorization
Proposal"), (iv) approved the change of the Company's corporate name from
"Paradigm Technology, Inc." to "IXYS Corporation" (the "Name Change
Proposal"), (v) elected each of the persons below to serve as a directors
of the Company until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until his
successor is elected (the "Director Proposal"); (vi) approved the amendment
of the Company's 1994 Stock Option Plan, as amended, to (A) increase the
number of shares of Common Stock available for grant thereunder to
employees, independent contractors and advisors by 100,000 shares (after
the Reverse Stock Split), (B) increase the number of shares of common stock
available for grant to non-employee directors by 15,000 shares (after the
Reverse Stock Split), (C) provide that non-employee directors who are
employed by the stockholders of the Company who hold more than 5% of the
outstanding shares of common stock of the Company shall not be eligible to
receive non-discretionary grants of stock options under the 1994 Stock
Option Plan and (D) increase the number of shares of common stock that can
be made subject to options in any fiscal year to 35,000 (after the Reverse
Stock Split) (the "Stock Plan Proposal"), and (vii) ratified the selection
of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent accountants for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 1998 (the "Ratification Proposal").
There were 1,779,401 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 19,1998,
the record date for the Annual Meeting. At the Annual Meeting, holders of
a total of 1,709,235 shares of common stock were present in person or
represented by proxy. The following sets forth information regarding the
results of the voting at the Annual Meeting:
(C) PROPOSAL 1: THE ISSUANCE PROPOSAL
Votes in Favor 1,041,899
Votes Against 139,556
Abstentions 25,116
Broker Non-Votes 502,664
17
PROPOSAL 2: THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT PROPOSAL
Votes in Favor 963,398
Votes Against 231,441
Abstentions 33,164
Broker Non-Votes 481,232
PROPOSAL 3: THE INCREASED AUTHORIZATION PROPOSAL
Votes in Favor 1,012,379
Votes Against 180,851
Abstentions 34,773
Broker Non-Votes 481,232
PROPOSAL 4: THE NAME CHANGE PROPOSAL
Votes in Favor 1,105,437
Votes Against 87,734
Abstentions 34,831
Broker Non-Votes 481,233
PROPOSAL 5: THE DIRECTOR PROPOSAL
VOTES IN FAVOR VOTES WITHHELD
-------------- --------------
George J. Collins 1,592,566 116,670
Michael R. Gulett 1,554,154 155,082
James L. Kochman 1,593,344 115,892
PROPOSAL 6: THE STOCK PLAN PROPOSAL
Votes in Favor 947,237
Votes Against 216,560
Abstentions 42,774
Broker Non-Votes 502,664
PROPOSAL 7: THE RATIFICATION PROPOSAL
Votes in Favor 1,611,966
Votes Against 62,746
Abstentions 34,522
Broker Non-Votes 1
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) EXHIBITS.
3.1 Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation (regarding increased authorization and reverse
stock split).
3.2 Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation (regarding name change).
10 Registration and Stockholder Rights Agreement, by and between the
Company, Asea Brown Boveri AG, and Asea Brown Boveri, Inc., dated
September 23, 1998.
18
11 Computation of Per Share Earnings as set forth in Note 8 of the Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I of the Form
10-Q.
27 Financial Data Schedule.
(B) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(i) Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on August 7,
1998 reporting the resignation of the Registrant's Chief Financial
Officer and Vice President of Finance on August 7, 1998.
(ii) Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on August 19,
1998, reporting that the Registrant had filed its Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q on August 14, 1998. The Form 10-Q, including the financial
statements included therein, was filed as an exhibit to the August 19,
1998 Form 8-K.
(iii) Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on August 27,
1998, reporting that the Registrant had adjourned its Annual Meeting
until September 3, 1998.
(iv) Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on September
8, 1998, reporting that the Registrant had adjourned its Annual
Meeting until September 10, 1998.
(v) Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on September
14, 1998, reporting that the Registrant's stockholders had approved
all the proposals voted upon at the Annual Meeting.
19
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
IXYS CORPORATION
By: /s/ ARNOLD AGBAYANI
------------------------
Arnold Agbayani, Vice President,
Finance and Administration
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date: November 15, 1998
20
EXHIBIT INDEX
-------------
3.1 Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation (regarding increased authorization and reverse stock
split).
3.2 Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation (regarding name change).
10 Registration and Stockholder Rights Agreement, by and between the
Company, Asea Brown Boveri AG, and Asea Brown Boveri, Inc., dated
September 23, 1998.
11 Computation of Per Share Earnings as set forth in Note 8 of the Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I of the Form
10-Q.
27 Financial Data Schedule.