SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                              Washington, DC 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): March 28, 2006

                         STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                         ------------------------------


        New Jersey                                              22-3827597
- ----------------------------    ------------------------    --------------------
(State or other jurisdiction    (Commission File Number)     (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation)                                           Identification No.)

            1090 King Georges Post Road, Suite 108, Edison, NJ     08837
            --------------------------------------------------------------
             (Address of principal executive offices)           (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:          (732) 661 9641



                                       N/A

          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Check  the  appropriate  box  below  if the  Form  8-K  filing  is  intended  to
simultaneously  satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the
following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)

[ ] Soliciting  material  pursuant to Rule 14a-12(b)  under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.14a-12(b))

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule
14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange
Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




ITEM 4.01         CHANGES IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANTS

1.   Previous Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

     A. On March  21,  2006,  StrikeForce  Technologies,  Inc.  (the  "Company")
dismissed  Rosen Seymour Shapss Martin & Company ("the former  accountants")  as
the Company's  independent  registered  public  accounting firm. In light of the
Company's limited financial  resources,  the Company  determined that it was not
practicable  for  it to  continue  to  retain  the  former  accountants  as  its
independent  registered public accounting firm. The Company is currently seeking
another  independent  registered  public  accounting  firm that would be able to
audit the Company's  fiscal 2005  financial  statements on a more cost effective
basis.

     B. the former  accountants  did not audit the  financial  statements of the
Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005.

     C.  The  decision  to  dismiss  the  former  accountants  as the  Company's
independent registered public accounting firm was approved by the members of the
Board of Directors of the Company.

     D. Since their  appointment in December 2005, the former  accountants  have
been  gathering   information  and  making   inquiries  of  management  and  the
predecessor  accountant in support of the  registrant's  opening  balances as of
January 1, 2005 and in  preparation  for their audit for the year ended December
31, 2005. Certain documentation we provided was deemed insufficient to support a
certain opening balance for the purpose of the 2005 audit.  Until this matter is
resolved to their  satisfaction,  the former  accountants would not proceed with
the engagement.

     We did not agree with the former  accountants  concerning  the adequacy and
sufficiency of the documentation to support the registrant's  opening balance as
of January 1, 2005,  but we were not able to reach a conclusion  as we could not
afford to continue to pay the fees of the former accountants which substantially
exceeded the estimate originally provided to us when we engaged them.

     These "claims" of the  documentation to support certain opening balances as
of January 1, 2005 were in the nature of the  "insufficiencies".  To the best of
our knowledge,  the former  accountants  did not obtain the  documentation  they
expected to support a certain opening balance, nor did they perform any auditing
procedures  in order to reach a conclusion  or form an opinion on any matters of
accounting  principles  or practices,  or financial  statement  disclosures,  or
auditing scope or procedure in connection with the 2005 audit engagement.

     E. The  Registrant  provided  the  former  accountants  with a copy of this
Current Report and has requested  that it furnish the  Registrant  with a letter
addressed to the Securities & Exchange Commission stating whether it agrees with
the above  statements.  A copy of such letter is filed herein as Exhibit 16.1 to
this Current Report on Form 8-K.


                                       2


ITEM 9.01         FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.

(a)  Financial Statements of Businesses Acquired: None

(b)  Pro-Forma Financial Statements: None

(c)  Exhibits:

Exhibit
No.                                  Description
- --------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
16.1      Letter of Rosen  Seymour  Shapss Martin & Company dated March 28, 2006
          to the Securities and Exchange Commission.








                                       3





                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the  Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                         STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                         ------------------------------
                                (Registrant)




                          By: /s/ Mark Corrao
                          ------------------------------
                          Mark Corrao
                          Chief Financial Officer




Dated:  March 28, 2006