UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                               DISTRICT OF KANSAS


LEWIS F. GEER, et al.,          )
                                )
                 Plaintiffs,    )
                                )
v.                              ) Case No. 01-2583-JAR
WILLIAM D. COX, et al.,         )
                                )
                 Defendants.    )
- --------------------------------
DAVID GROGAN,                   )
                                )
                 Plaintiff,     )
                                )
v.                              ) Case No. 03-2091-KHV
                                )
TIMOTHY P. O'NEIL, et al.,      )
                                )
                 Defendants.    )


                     STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT
                     ---------------------------------------

     Plaintiffs Lewis F. Geer and David Grogan  ("Plaintiffs")<F1>  on behalf of
(i) themselves in any and all capacities,  (ii)  TransFinancial  Holdings,  Inc.
("TransFinancial"  or the  "Company")  in  Plaintiffs'  capacity  as  derivative
plaintiffs,  and (iii) all  members of the class  defined  below in  Plaintiffs'
capacity as class representatives, on the one hand, and the Settling Defendants,
identified below, on the other hand, by and through their undersigned attorneys,
hereby enter into the following  Stipulation  and  Agreement of Settlement  (the
"Settlement" or "Stipulation"), dated as of October 18, 2004, and subject to the
approval of the United  States  District  Court for the  District of Kansas (the
"Court").

- ----------------------
<F1> All capitalized terms  not  otherwise  defined  shall carry the meaning set
forth in paragraph 1 below.




                                    RECITALS
                                    --------

     WHEREAS, on or after January 12, 2000,  Plaintiff David Grogan, for himself
and for all others similarly situated,  filed an action in the Court of Chancery
of Delaware, New Castle County,  entitled David Grogan v. Timothy P. O'Neil, et.
al.,  C.A.  No.  17733,   alleging  that  the   defendants,   the  directors  of
TransFinancial, violated their fiduciary duty in approving a proposed management
buyout; and

     WHEREAS,  following the  withdrawal of the proposed  management  buyout and
amendments to the complaint to add claims relating to the sale of assets without
shareholder  approval and  liquidation  of the Company,  such case was dismissed
without prejudice pursuant to agreement of the parties and, on or after February
28, 2003,  was refiled in the United States  District  Court for the District of
Kansas,  entitled  David  Grogan  v.  Timothy  P.  O'Neil,  et.  al.,  Case  No.
03-2091-KHV  (the "Grogan  case"); and

     WHEREAS, on or after December 7, 2001, Plaintiff Lewis F. Geer, for himself
and for all others  similarly  situated,  filed an action in the  United  States
District  Court for the District of Kansas,  entitled  Lewis F. Geer, et. al. v.
William D. Cox, et al., Case No.  01-2583-JAR  (the "Geer case"),  alleging that
the  sale  of  the  assets  of  one  of  TransFinancial's  subsidiaries  without
shareholder  approval  constituted  a violation  of Del.  Corp.  Code ss.271 and
conversion; and

     WHEREAS,  by Order dated August 15, 2003, the Grogan case was  consolidated
with the Geer case for  purposes  of  discovery;  and

     WHEREAS,   by  Order  dated   September  23,  2004,  the  Grogan  case  was
consolidated  with the Geer case solely for purposes of review and consideration
of the  Settlement; and

     WHEREAS,  counsel for  Plaintiffs  and counsel for the Settling  Defendants
have engaged in substantial arms'-length  negotiations spanning a period of over
two years in an effort to resolve  the  Actions,  including  exchanging  written
demands and offers, conducting numerous

                                       2



telephone conferences, and engaging in a thorough,  month-long mediation process
before a nationally recognized mediator, Jonathan Marks of MarksADR, culminating
in a two-day  mediation  session  in  Washington,  D.C.  where the merits of the
claims and defenses and the terms of any agreement were extensively  debated and
negotiated,  and  including a subsequent  settlement  conference  with a federal
magistrate to facilitate resolution of outstanding issues; and

     WHEREAS,  the Settling  Defendants  vigorously deny that they committed any
violations of any state or federal laws,  vigorously deny that they did anything
but fully  fulfill  their duties,  vigorously  deny all charges and  allegations
asserted against them, and disclaim any wrongdoing or liability whatsoever; and

     WHEREAS,  the  Settling  Defendants  have  agreed  to  the  compromise  and
settlement of these Actions subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein
solely to avoid the substantial burden, expense, and uncertainties that would be
involved in protracted litigation,  and to terminate the Released Claims against
them; and

     WHEREAS,  Plaintiffs  have agreed to settle  their claims and those of both
the  Company  (asserted  derivatively)  and  Class  Members  upon the  terms and
provisions set forth herein after and as a result of extensive investigation and
thorough  research of the law  applicable to the claims  underlying the Actions;
after  balancing  these  benefits  that all  plaintiffs  will  receive  from the
Settlement against the uncertain outcomes,  risks,  difficulties,  and delays of
litigation,  in general,  and in complex  litigation  such as these Actions,  in
particular,  and after concluding that the Settlement is in the best interest of
the Class Members and the Company; and

     WHEREAS,  the Settling Parties and their counsel believe that the terms and
conditions of this Stipulation are fair,  reasonable,  adequate, and proper, and
acknowledge  that this  Stipulation  is a result of arms'-  length  negotiations
between the parties:

                                       3



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and agreements, covenants,
representations, and warranties set forth herein, intending to be legally bound;

     IT IS HEREBY  STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the Settling Parties that
these Actions and all Released  Claims are settled and  compromised and that the
Actions shall be dismissed with prejudice and without costs, except as otherwise
provided for herein,  subject to approval of the Court  pursuant to Rules 23 and
23.1 of the  Federal  Rules  of  Civil  Procedure  on the  following  terms  and
conditions:

                                   DEFINITIONS
                                   -----------

     1.   In  addition  to  terms  defined  in  other  provisions, the following
definitions shall apply to this Stipulation:

          A. "Actions" means the Geer case and the Grogan case, collectively.

          B. The  "Class"  means  all  persons  and  entities  who, at  any time
     from June 21,  1999 to the close of  business on April 29, 2002 (the "Class
     Period"),  owned  publicly-traded  common  stock  issued by  TransFinancial
     ("TransFinancial  Stock")  and  their  heirs,   successors,   assigns,  and
     transferees.  Excluded  from the Class are the  Defendants,  including  any
     shares owned  directly or  indirectly of record or  beneficially  by any of
     them.

          C. "Class  Member"  means  any  person  or  entity  who is a member of
     the  Class,   including  beneficial  owners  of  the  TransFinancial  Stock
     purchased  on their  behalf by  others,  but  excluding  those  persons  or
     entities who submit (or for whom are submitted)  valid and timely  requests
     for exclusion from the Class in accordance  with the procedure set forth in
     the Notice of Proposed Settlement of Derivative and Class Actions,  Request
     for Attorneys' Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses,  and Settlement Fairness
     Hearing  substantially  in  the  form  annexed  hereto  as  Exhibit  B (the
     "Notice"). This definition

                                       4



      includes Plaintiffs and both Shareholders  and  Selling  Shareholders,  as
      those terms are defined below.

          D. "Escrow Agent" means UMB Bank, N.A. or such other subsequent entity
      that the Court shall appoint.

          E. "Final  Judgment"  means a judgment to be entered by the Court that
     will direct the  implementation  of the  Settlement in accordance  with the
     terms of the  Stipulation or as the Court may otherwise  direct,  approve a
     method of allocating  the settlement  proceeds,  approve the payment of any
     remaining or anticipated expenses incurred in administering the Settlement,
     determine the amount of attorneys'  fees and expenses to award to Plaintiff
     Class Counsel,  determine the amount of any incentive award for Plaintiffs,
     and take any other action to fully and finally  dispose of the  Actions.  A
     proposed  form of Final  Judgment  shall be submitted  by  Plaintiff  Class
     Counsel at or before the Settlement Hearing.

          F.  "Final  Order"  means  that  order  to be  entered  by the  Court,
     substantially  in the form of Exhibit E hereto,  approving the  Settlement,
     dismissing all claims in the Actions  against the Settling  Defendants with
     prejudice,  releasing all Released Claims,  and enjoining Class Members and
     the  Company  from  instituting,  continuing,  or  prosecuting  any  action
     asserting one or more of the Released Claims.

          G. "Individual  Defendants" means William D. Cox, Harold C. Hill, Jr.,
     Roy R. Laborde, Timothy P. O'Neil, Clark D. Stewart, and David D. Taggert.

          H. "Released Claims" means any and all claims, rights, demands, causes
     of action, suits,  matters, and issues whether known or unknown,  suspected
     or unsuspected,  liquidated or  unliquidated  (including but not limited to
     all Unknown Claims and claims

                                       5



     for  attorneys'  fees),  arising  under any state or federal  statutory  or
     common law, that have been,  might have been, or could be asserted  against
     any Released Party by any Class Member,  or derivatively on behalf of or by
     TransFinancial,  arising out of or related,  directly or indirectly, in any
     way  to  the  allegations,   transactions,   facts,  matters,  occurrences,
     representations,  or omissions  involved in, set forth in,  referred to, or
     that could have been asserted in one or both of the Actions.

          I. "Released  Parties" means each of the Settling  Defendants and each
     of  their  parents,   subsidiaries,   and  affiliates,  and  each  Settling
     Defendant's  present  or former  directors,  officers,  employees,  agents,
     insurers, attorneys,  advisors,  successors, heirs, assigns, executors, and
     personal  representatives.

          J. "RLR Defendants" means R.L.R. Investments, L.L.C. and R&L Transfer,
     Inc.

          K. "Selling  Shareholder"  means any Class Member who sold some or all
     of his, her, or its shares during the Class Period.

          L. "Settlement  Administrator" means Berdon Claims  Administration LLC
     or such other or subsequent person or entity that the Court shall appoint.

          M.  "Settling   Defendants"  means   TransFinancial,   the  Individual
     Defendants, and the RLR Defendants.

          N.  "Settlement  Effective  Date"  means the date upon which the Final
     Order becomes  final and no longer  subject to appeal or review (or further
     appeal or review),  whether by  exhaustion of any possible  appeal,  or the
     expiration of any applicable appeal period.

                                       6



          O.  "Settlement  Hearing"  means a hearing  to be held by the Court to
     consider final  approval of the Settlement  pursuant to Rule 23(e) and Rule
     23.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

          P.  "Settling  Parties"  means  all  Class  Members  and the  Settling
     Defendants.

          Q.  "Shareholder"  means  any  Class  Member  who  was the  record  or
     beneficial owner of the TransFinancial Stock as of the close of business on
     April 29, 2002.

          R. "Unknown Claims" means any and all claims, rights,  demands, causes
     of action,  suits, matters, and issues which any Class Member does not know
     or suspect to exist in his, her, or its favor at the time of the release of
     the  Released  Parties  which,  if known by him,  her,  or it,  might  have
     reasonably  affected  his, her, or its  settlement  with and release of the
     Released  Parties,  or might have affected his, her, or its decision not to
     object to this  Settlement.  With respect to any and all  Released  Claims,
     upon the Settlement  Effective Date, each Class Member, by operation of the
     Final  Judgment,  waives  any  and all  provisions,  rights,  and  benefits
     conferred by Cal. Civ. Code ss.1542, which provides:

          A GENERAL  RELEASE  DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS  WHICH THE CREDITOR
          DOES NOT  KNOW OR  SUSPECT  TO EXIST IN HIS  FAVOR AT THE TIME OF
          EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERIALLY
          AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR,

      and any other law of any jurisdiction (domestic or foreign), or principle
      of common law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to said
      provision.

                                       7



                         SCOPE AND EFFECT OF SETTLEMENT
                         ------------------------------

     2. The obligations  incurred  pursuant to this Stipulation shall be in full
and final  disposition of the Actions and any and all Released Claims as against
any and all Released Parties.

     3. Upon the Settlement  Effective Date, each Class Member shall release and
forever discharge, and shall forever be enjoined from prosecuting, each Released
Claim,  including without limitation any and each Unknown Claim, against any and
all of the Released Parties.

                            SETTLEMENT CONSIDERATION

     4. Subject to completion and execution of an escrow  agreement,  within ten
(10) days of entry of a Preliminary  Approval and Scheduling Order substantially
in the form annexed  hereto as Exhibit A  ("Scheduling  Order"),  the Individual
Defendants' insurance carrier,  Federal Insurance Company ("Federal") will cause
the amount of two million five hundred  thousand  dollars  ($2,500,000.00)  (the
"Settlement  Fund") in cash to be  deposited  into an  interest  bearing  escrow
account  (the  "Escrow  Account").  Each  Settling  Party  agrees to execute any
standard  escrow  agreements  presented by the Escrow Agent,  including  without
limitation indemnification and hold harmless provisions.

     5. The Escrow  Account is to be a  "Qualified  Settlement  Fund" within the
meaning of Treasury Regulations ss. 1.468B-1. The Escrow Agent, as administrator
of the Qualified  Settlement Fund within the meaning of Treasury Regulations ss.
1.468B-2(k)(3),  shall be responsible for the tax returns for the Escrow Account
and paying  from the Escrow  Account  any taxes owed with  respect to the Escrow
Account. The Settling Defendants agree to have their counsel promptly provide to
the  Escrow  Agent  the  statement   described  in  Treasury   Regulations   ss.
1.468B-3(e).  The  Settling  Defendants  shall not be liable  for filing any tax
returns or paying any taxes with respect to the Settlement Fund.

                                       8



     6. No funds  held in the  Escrow  Account  shall be  distributed  except in
accordance with this  Stipulation or with an order of the Court.  The Settlement
Fund shall be deemed to be in the custody of the Court and shall remain  subject
to the  jurisdiction  of the Court  until such time as the funds are  applied to
expenses,  distributed to Class Members, and/or delivered to Federal pursuant to
this Stipulation or further order of the Court.

     7. The following shall be considered part of the cost of the administration
of the Settlement and, subject to Court approval in the Scheduling Order,  shall
be paid timely by the Escrow Agent in advance of the Settlement Hearing with the
funds deposited into the Escrow Account:

          A. All fees and  expenses  charged or incurred by the Escrow Agent for
     or while acting in that capacity, including without limitation generating a
     list of record owners during the Class Period;

          B. All (i) taxes on the income of the Escrow Account and (ii) expenses
     and costs incurred in connection  with the taxation of the Escrow  Account,
     including without limitation expenses of tax attorneys and accountants; and

               C. All fees and expenses incurred by the Settlement Administrator
          in connection with the administration of the proposed settlement prior
          to the Settlement  Hearing,  including all costs related to the giving
          of  notice  to the  Class  as  ordered  by  the  Court  and  receiving
          communications from Class Members and maintaining correspondence, such
          as any requests for exclusion from the Class.  Items A, B, and C above
          are collectively referred to as "Preliminary Administrative Expenses."

     8. In the event that the  Settlement  is terminated or for any other reason
the  Settlement  is not approved and  implemented,  the  remaining  funds in the
Escrow Account (which

                                       9



should equal the Settlement Fund,  including any interest earned thereon, net of
the  Preliminary  Administrative  Expenses) shall be delivered to Federal within
three (3) business days.

     9. In the event the Settlement is approved by the Court in the Final Order,
and the Settlement  Effective  Date occurs,  the Escrow  Account,  including any
interest earned thereon, net of the Preliminary  Administrative  Expenses, shall
be used to pay, as directed by the Court in a Final Judgment,  (i) the remaining
or  any  anticipated  administration  expenses  incurred  in  administering  the
Settlement,  including  without  limitation any fees charged or to be charged by
the Settlement  Administrator;  (ii) any attorneys' fees and expenses awarded to
Plaintiff  Class  Counsel;  and (iii) any  incentive  award to  Plaintiffs.  The
remaining  balance of the Escrow  Account after payment of these items (the "Net
Settlement  Fund") shall be  distributed  to Class Members as provided  below in
paragraph 20. The Settlement  Administrator and the Escrow Agent shall cooperate
to determine the most economical  method of  distribution.  To the extent checks
are used to make payments to Class Members (as opposed to wire  transfers),  the
following  language  shall appear on the back of each:  "By cashing or endorsing
this  check,  I  affirm  my  personal  release  of  claims   identified  in  the
____________,  2005 Final Order in Case Nos.  01-2583 and 03-2091 in the Federal
District Court of Kansas." Class Members shall look solely to the Net Settlement
Fund for settlement and satisfaction of any and all Released Claims.

                PRELIMINARY APPROVAL AND SCHEDULING ORDER
                -----------------------------------------

     10.  As soon as  practicable  after  execution  of  this  Stipulation,  the
Settling  Parties shall apply to the Court for entry of a  Preliminary  Approval
and  Scheduling  Order  substantially  in the form  annexed  hereto as Exhibit A
("Scheduling Order"), which order shall, inter alia:

                                       10



          A.  Conditionally (i) certify the Class for settlement  purposes only,
     (ii)  appoint  Plaintiffs  as  class  representatives,  and  (iii)  appoint
     Plaintiffs' counsel as counsel for the Class ("Plaintiff Class Counsel");

          B.  Preliminarily  approve the  Settlement  as fair,  reasonable,  and
     adequate;

          C. Appoint the Escrow Agent and Settlement Administrator;

          D. Review the anticipated notice procedures and determine, pursuant to
     Rule 23(c)(2) and Rule 23.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil  Procedure,  that
     the  giving  of  notice  as  provided  herein  meets  the  requirements  of
     applicable  law and due process,  constitutes  the best notice  practicable
     under the  circumstances to all persons entitled  thereto,  and constitutes
     due and sufficient notice of the Settlement  Hearing an the rights of Class
     Members with respect thereto.

          E.  Approve  the Notice and Proof of Claim  substantially  in the form
     annexed hereto as Exhibits B and C, respectively, and direct the Settlement
     Administrator  to mail the  Notice  and  Proof  of  Claim,  no  later  than
     seventy-five  (75)  days  prior to the  Settlement  Hearing,  to all  Class
     Members  who are or were  record  holders of  TransFinancial  common  stock
     during the Class Period,  with  instructions  to record holders who hold or
     held the shares for the benefit of others  either (i) to deliver  copies of
     the Notice and Proof of Claim to each such beneficial owner on whose behalf
     the shares are held or were held during the Class Period or (ii) to provide
     a list of the  names and  addresses  of all such  beneficial  owners to the
     Settlement  Administrator so that it can promptly mail the Notice and Proof
     of Claim to them.

          F.  Approve  the  Summary  Notice for  Publication  of  Settlement  of
     Derivative  and Class Actions  substantially  in the form annexed hereto as
     Exhibit D ("Summary

                                       11



      Notice") and direct the Settlement Administrator to cause the Summary
      Notice to be published in The Wall Street Journal and in The Kansas City
      Star;

          G. Direct the  Settlement  Administrator  to post on its internet site
     this  Stipulation,  all exhibits annexed hereto,  and such other pleadings,
     documents, and orders of the Court as the Settling Parties may agree or the
     Court may order;

          H.  Approve  the  payment  of  up  to  $125,000  of  all   Preliminary
     Administrative  Expenses out of the funds to be  deposited  into the Escrow
     Account by the Settling Defendants;

          I. Approve the delivery directly to Federal of all funds in the Escrow
     Account  in the  event  that,  and at  such  time  as,  the  Settlement  is
     terminated  pursuant to the terms of the  Stipulation or is not approved by
     the Court or, if appealed, the appellate court(s).

          J.  Schedule a  Settlement  Hearing to be held before the Court,  at a
     time and date to be set by the Court,  as set forth in the Notice,  finally
     to consider and  determine,  or to direct the later  determination  without
     further notice of, (i) the  reasonableness,  adequacy,  and fairness of the
     Settlement, (ii) whether the Final Order should be entered pursuant to this
     Stipulation, (iii) whether the method of allocating the Net Settlement Fund
     should be approved,  and (iv) whether the  applications  of Plaintiff Class
     Counsel  for  attorneys'  fees  and   reimbursement  of  expenses  and  for
     Plaintiffs' incentive awards should be approved;

          K.  Require any person who is a Class  Member and who does not want to
     participate  in  and/or  be  bound  by  the  Settlement  to  submit  to the
     Settlement  Administrator  a request for exclusion  from the Class no later
     than thirty (30) days prior to

                                       12



      the Settlement  Hearing,  in such manner and containing  such
      information as required by the Notice; and

          L. Require any Class Member who has not requested  exclusion  from the
     Class or any  Shareholder  who  wants to  object  to the  approval  of this
     Stipulation  and the  Settlement to file and serve in writing no later than
     twenty-four  (24)  days  prior to the  Settlement  Hearing,  in the  manner
     provided in the Notice,  a statement of the  objection  and the grounds for
     such  objection,  and provide that any Class Member or Shareholder who does
     not follow the objection procedure in the Notice will be barred from making
     any objection to any aspect of the Settlement.

                           SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION
                           -------------------------

     11. The Settlement Administrator shall administer the Settlement subject to
supervision  of  Plaintiff  Class  Counsel  and the Court as  circumstances  may
require.

     12.  TransFinancial  and/or the Individual  Defendants  shall authorize the
Company's transfer agent to provide to the Settlement Administrator (A) the list
of record owners of the Company's  stock as of April 29, 2002,  the day on which
TransFinancial  filed a certificate of  liquidation  and closed its stock record
books,  which  list  was  used  for  the  purposes  of  making  the  liquidation
distribution to shareholders  and will be used for making the final  liquidation
distribution  in the  future;  and (B)  the  list of all  record  owners  of the
Company's stock during the Class Period. Within ten (10) days after the entry of
the Scheduling  Order,  Individual  Defendants shall also provide the Settlement
Administrator a list, with respect to each Individual  Defendant,  of all shares
held directly or indirectly by such defendant as of April 29, 2002, and, if such
shares were or are held beneficially, the name, address and telephone number, of
the nominee or broker holding such shares,  and the account number in which such
shares were or are held.

                                       13



     13. Following entry of the Scheduling  Order, the Settlement  Administrator
shall comply with the  directives  therein,  including  providing  notice of the
Class. The Settlement Administrator shall also receive and maintain all requests
for exclusion from the Class. The Escrow Agent shall maintain the Escrow Account
and  work  with  the  Settlement  Administrator  to  effectuate  payment  of the
Preliminary Administrative Expenses.

     14. Upon or after the Settlement Effective Date,  Settlement  Administrator
and the Escrow  Agent  shall make the  distributions  approved  by the Court and
further  distribute  the Net  Settlement  Fund in accordance  with the method of
allocation  approved  by the  Court.  The  Settlement  Administrator  and/or the
Settling  Parties may apply to the Court to resolve any issue that arises in the
administration of the Settlement which cannot be resolved by agreement. If there
is a  balance  remaining  in  the  Escrow  Account  a  year  after  the  initial
distribution  to Class  Members in accordance  to the  Court-approved  method of
allocation and such balance is not needed for  satisfaction of remaining  unpaid
or  accrued  administration  expenses,  such  balance  shall  be  donated  to an
appropriate  501(c)(3)  non-profit  organization  designated by Plaintiff  Class
Counsel.

     15. The Settling Defendants and their insurers,  counsel,  and other agents
shall have no responsibility for or liability whatsoever with respect to:

          A. Any act,  omission,  or determination of Plaintiff Class Counsel or
     their  designees or agents in  connection  with the  administration  of the
     Settlement;

          B.  Any  act,  omission,  or  determination  of the  Escrow  Agent  or
     Settlement Administrator;

          C. The management,  investment, or distribution of the Settlement Fund
     or the Net Settlement Fund;

                                       14



          D. The determination,  administration,  calculation, or payment of any
     distribution from or claims asserted against the Settlement Fund or the Net
     Settlement Fund; or

          E. The method of allocating the Net Settlement Fund.

                                   FINAL ORDER
                                   -----------

     16. If the Court ultimately  approves the terms of the Settlement set forth
in this Stipulation,  a Final Order  substantially in the form annexed hereto as
Exhibit E shall be entered and shall,  inter alia:

          A. Approve the Settlement,  adjudge its terms to be fair,  reasonable,
     and adequate, and retain jurisdiction to effectuate the same;

          B. Completely discharge, settle, dismiss with prejudice,  release, and
     permanently bar and enjoin the assertion,  prosecution,  or continuation by
     any  and  all  Class  Members  of any  Released  Claim,  including  without
     limitation  any Unknown  Claim,  against  each  Released  Party;  provided,
     however,  that the Final Order shall not bar any action or claim to enforce
     the terms of the  Settlement  as approved by the Court or the Final  Order;
     and

          C. Certify the determination as to the fairness,  reasonableness,  and
     adequacy of the Settlement and the dismissal and injunction of all Released
     Claims against the Released Parties as final pursuant to Rule 54(b).

              INCENTIVE AWARDS, ATTORNEYS' FEES, AND DISBURSEMENTS
              ----------------------------------------------------

     17.  Plaintiff  Class  Counsel  may  apply  to the  Court  for an  award of
attorneys'  fees,  not to exceed one third of the  Settlement  Fund, and for the
reimbursement  of all expenses  incurred in these  Actions  from the  Settlement
Fund.  Such fees and expenses shall be payable solely out of the Settlement Fund
and shall be deducted from the Settlement Fund prior to any distribution to

                                       15



the  Class  Members.  In  addition,  Plaintiffs  may  apply to the  Court for an
incentive award of up to $10,000 each.  Settling Defendants will not oppose such
applications.

     18. As part of a Final  Judgment,  a form of which shall be submitted at or
before the  Settlement  Hearing,  the Court may  approve  Plaintiffs'  incentive
awards and Plaintiff Class Counsel's fees and expenses. If the Final Judgment is
not  appealed,  or after  any such  appeal is  resolved,  the  Escrow  Agent may
withdraw from the Escrow Account for distribution to Plaintiff Class Counsel the
fees and expenses  approved by the Court (or appellate  court) and to Plaintiffs
the incentive awards approved by the Court (or appellate court).

     19.  Notwithstanding  any  other  provision  of  this  Stipulation  to  the
contrary,  the procedure for and the allowance or  disallowance  (in whole or in
part) by the Court of any  application by Plaintiff Class Counsel for attorneys'
fees and expenses to be paid out of the Settlement  Fund and/or any  application
for an incentive award on behalf of Plaintiffs should be considered by the Court
separately and apart from its consideration of the fairness, reasonableness, and
adequacy of the Settlement, and any order or proceeding relating to the award of
attorneys' fees and expenses or the incentive awards, or any appeal of any order
relating  thereto,  shall not operate to terminate or cancel this Stipulation or
affect or delay the finality of the Final Order  approving the Settlement of the
Actions.

              ALLOCATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND
              ----------------------------------------------------

     20. The Net Settlement Fund shall be allocated and administered, subject to
approval by the Court in a Final Judgment, as follows:

          A. The Net  Settlement  Fund,  as  described  in paragraph 9, shall be
     divided  into two parts,  one to be  distributed  to Class  Members who are
     Shareholders (the "Shareholder  Fund"),  and one to be distributed to Class
     Members who are Selling

                                       16



      Shareholders (the "Selling Shareholders' Fund"). Unless otherwise ordered
      by the Court, 75% of the Net Settlement Fund shall be allocated to the
      Shareholder Fund, and 25% of the Net Settlement Fund shall be allocated to
      the Selling Shareholders' Fund.

          B. The  Shareholder  Fund, net of any costs incurred by the Settlement
     Administrator with respect to its administration, shall be distributed, pro
     rata in  proportion  to the  number of shares  held on April 29,  2002,  to
     Shareholders.  In making such  distribution,  the Settlement  Administrator
     shall use the list of shareholders to whom the dissolution distribution was
     made on or about July 2, 2002. With respect to any distribution of funds to
     record  holders  or  nominees  of record  holders  who hold  shares for the
     benefit of others,  the  Settlement  Administrator  shall  deduct  from the
     distribution  to such nominee any pro-rata  amounts  attributable to shares
     beneficially owned, directly or indirectly,  by the Individual  Defendants,
     and the Settlement  Administrator shall forward instructions to such record
     holders or nominees that no  distribution of funds shall be made to, or for
     the benefit of, any of the Individual Defendants.  The administrative costs
     of  distributing  the  Shareholder  Fund shall be paid from the Shareholder
     Fund.

          C. The  Selling  Shareholders  Fund,  net of the fees and costs of the
     Settlement Administrator with respect to its administration,  including the
     processing  of  claims  submitted  by the  Selling  Shareholders,  shall be
     distributed pro rata to those Selling  Shareholders who submit a timely and
     valid  Proof of Claim.  The pro rata  distribution  will be based  upon the
     greatest number of shares held and sold by a Selling Shareholder during the
     Class Period,  which will be calculated as the  difference  between (i) the
     maximum  number of  shares  that a  Selling  Shareholder  held at any point
     during the Class  Period and (ii) the number of shares held at the close of
     business on April 29, 2002. The

                                       17



     Settlement  Administrator  shall  sum the total of the  greatest  number of
     shares  held and sold by all  Selling  Shareholders  submitting  timely and
     valid Proofs of Claim, and shall distribute the Selling Shareholder Fund to
     each  Selling   Shareholder  in  the  same  proportion  that  such  Selling
     Shareholder's greatest number of shares held and sold bears to the total of
     all shares held and sold by all  Selling  Shareholders  who have  submitted
     timely  and  valid  Proofs  of  Claim.  In  order  to be  considered  for a
     distribution,   a  Selling   Shareholder  must  submit  to  the  Settlement
     Administrator, by no later than the date of the Settlement Hearing, a Proof
     of  Claim  in  the  form  attached  as  Exhibit  C,  and  provide  adequate
     documentation  of (i) the maximum number of shares held at any point during
     the Class  Period and (ii) the sale of such shares  before  April 29, 2002,
     which may be demonstrated  either by  documentation of the number of shares
     held at the close of  business  on April 29,  2002 or by  documentation  of
     individual sales transactions.  Any Proof of Claim that is postmarked after
     the date of the Settlement Hearing will not be considered by the Settlement
     Administrator.  All  fees  and  costs of the  Settlement  Administrator  in
     connection with the processing of claim forms and the administration of the
     Selling Shareholders Fund shall be paid from the Selling Shareholders Fund.
     Prior  to  distribution  to  the  Selling   Shareholders,   the  Settlement
     Administrator  shall  make a  report  to  Plaintiff  Class  Counsel  of the
     proposed distributions.

     21.  Notwithstanding  any  other  provision  of  this  Stipulation  to  the
contrary,  the proposed method of allocating the Net Settlement Fund, including,
but not  limited to, any  adjustments  thereto the Court may approve or require,
may be considered by the Court  separately and apart from its  consideration  of
the fairness,  reasonableness,  and adequacy of the Settlement, and any order or
proceeding relating to the method of allocation, or any appeal of any order

                                       18



relating  thereto,  shall not operate to terminate or cancel this Stipulation or
affect or delay the  finality of the Final Order  approving  the  Settlement  of
these Actions.

                      CONTINGENCIES, EFFECT OF DISAPPROVAL,
                      -------------------------------------
                          OR TERMINATION OF SETTLEMENT
                          ----------------------------

     22.  This  Settlement  and the  consideration  therefor  are  given  by the
Settling  Defendants in return for, and are  contingent  upon,  entry of a Final
Order,  substantially  in the form annexed  hereto as Exhibit E,  approving  the
Settlement,  dismissing  with  prejudice all of the claims  against the Settling
Defendants,  and a full and complete  release of all Released Claims  (including
without  limitation  any and all  Unknown  Claims) by any and all Class  Members
against any and all Released Parties,  which release may no longer be challenged
by any Class Member.

     23. In the event that the Court or, in the event of an appeal, an appellate
court having  jurisdiction  over the Actions,  refuses to approve or  materially
modifies this Stipulation or any proposed order to be entered pursuant  thereto,
then  counsel  for a  Settling  Party may  terminate  this  Stipulation  and the
Settlement  by giving  counsel  for all  other  Settling  Parties  and the Court
written  notice of the  termination no later than thirty (30) days following the
date of such refusal or modification giving rise to the right of termination.

     24.  Notwithstanding  any  other  provision  of  this  Stipulation  to  the
contrary,  in the event that any event permitting  termination of the Settlement
occurs, as described in the Supplemental  Stipulation executed concurrently with
this Stipulation,  then the Individual  Defendants may, in the exercise of their
absolute discretion, terminate this Stipulation and the Settlement in the manner
provided  in  the  Supplemental   Stipulation.

     25.  This  Settlement  and the  obligations  of the  Settling  Parties  are
conditioned upon and subject to:

                                       19



          A. Entry of the  Scheduling  Order  substantially  in the form annexed
     hereto as Exhibit A  preliminarily  approving the  Settlement and approving
     the Class notice;

          B. Receipt and review by the Individual Defendants of all requests for
     exclusion from the Class and the Individual  Defendants'  determination not
     to exercise, or failure to exercise within the time provided,  their rights
     under the Supplemental Stipulation;

          C.  The  Settling   Parties'   determination  not  to  exercise  their
     termination rights (if any) under paragraphs 22-24;

          D. Entry of the Final Order  substantially  in the form annexed hereto
     as Exhibit E;

          E. The occurrence of the Settlement Effective Date; and

          F. The existence of a valid and binding  settlement  agreement between
     the Company and the RLR Defendants.

     26. If for any reason this  Stipulation  is  terminated  or fails to become
effective, then, in such event:

          A. The  Settling  Parties  shall be deemed to have  reverted  to their
     respective  status  in the  Actions  as of April 1,  2004,  and,  except as
     otherwise  expressly  provided,  the Settling  Parties shall proceed in all
     respects as if this Stipulation and any related orders, including the Final
     Judgment, had not been entered;

          B. Within three (3) business  days of such  termination  or failure to
     become  effective,  the Escrow  Agent shall  deliver the  Settlement  Fund,
     including   any   interest   earned   thereon,   net  of  any   Preliminary
     Administrative Expenses, directly to Federal. During that time the Settling
     Parties shall cooperate to facilitate this delivery.

                                       20



          C. The Settling  Defendants shall thereafter have the right to object,
     inter alia, (i) to the  maintenance of either or both of these Actions as a
     class action  pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil  Procedure,
     all such objections to class certification having been preserved;  and (ii)
     to the consolidation of these Actions for any purpose other than discovery,
     all such objections to consolidation having been preserved.

                           NO ADMISSION OF WRONGDOING
                           --------------------------

     27. Each of the Settling  Defendants (i) has denied, and continues to deny,
that he or it has  committed  any  violation  of federal or state  statutory  or
common law, (ii) has denied and continues to deny all  allegations of wrongdoing
or liability whatsoever with respect to the Released Claims, including all facts
or claims alleged in the Actions, and (iii) repeatedly has maintained that he or
it  fully  and  properly  fulfilled  any  and all  fiduciary  duties  and  legal
obligations. Each of the Settling Defendants states that he or it is agreeing to
this  Settlement  solely  because it will  eliminate  the burden,  expense,  and
uncertainties of further litigation and the concomitant distraction of resources
and efforts.

     28. This Stipulation,  any of its terms (or any agreement or order relating
thereto),  any payment or  consideration  provided for herein,  or any statement
made in connection with the approval of the Settlement shall not be construed as
an admission or evidence of any kind with respect to the  existence,  or absence
of, any fault, wrongdoing, or liability of the Settling Defendants. Neither this
Stipulation  nor any  statements  made in  connection  with the approval of this
Settlement  (nor any  agreement  or order  relating  thereto)  shall be  deemed,
offered,  or received in evidence  in any civil,  criminal,  administrative,  or
other  proceeding  or utilized in any manner  whatsoever  by any of the Settling
Parties, including as a presumption, a concession, or an admission of any fault,
wrongdoing,  or  liability  whatsoever,  or  lack  thereof,  on the  part of any
Settling Defendants; provided, however, that nothing contained in this paragraph
shall prevent

                                       21



this Stipulation (or any agreement or order relating thereto) from being used,
offered, or received in evidence in any proceeding to approve, enforce, or
otherwise effectuate the Settlement (or any agreement or order relating thereto)
or the Final Judgment, or in which the reasonableness, fairness, or good faith
of the Settling Parties in participating in the Settlement (or any agreement or
order relating thereto) is an issue, or to enforce or effectuate provisions of
this Settlement, the Final Judgment, or the Release.

                                  MISCELLANEOUS

     29. All counsel who execute  this  Stipulation  represent  and warrant that
they have authority to do so on behalf of their respective clients.

     30. The Settling Parties and all signatories to this  Stipulation  agree to
use their best efforts,  including all steps  contemplated by this  Stipulation,
and any other steps and efforts that may become  necessary by order of the Court
or otherwise,  to effectuate this  Stipulation  and the Settlement  contemplated
hereunder.

     31.  This   Stipulation   (including   exhibits   hereto,   agreements  and
stipulations   referenced   herein,  and  documents  executed  pursuant  to  the
foregoing)  contain the entire agreement among the Settling Parties with respect
to  the  subject  matter  hereof  and  supersedes  any  prior  written  or  oral
agreements,  representations,  warranties,  or  statements.  No  representation,
warranty,  statement, or inducement has been made to any party hereto concerning
this  Stipulation  other than the  representations,  warranties,  and  covenants
contained herein. This Stipulation may not be altered,  modified, or amended, or
any of its provisions waived,  unless by a writing,  executed by counsel for all
of the Settling Parties affected by such change.

     32. Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs'  counsel expressly warrant that, in entering
into  this  Stipulation,  they  relied  solely  upon  their  own  knowledge  and
investigation, and not upon any

                                       22



promise,  representation,  warranty,  or  other  statement  by any or all of the
Settling Defendants not expressly contained in this Stipulation or its Exhibits.

     33. This  Stipulation may be executed in one or more  counterparts,  all of
which  shall be  considered  the same as if a single  document  shall  have been
executed,  and shall become effective when such counterparts have been signed by
each of the  Settling  Parties  and  delivered  to each  of the  other  Settling
Parties.

     34. Upon prior  notice to the Court and after  approval  of the Court,  the
Settling Parties may agree to reasonable  extensions of time to carry out any of
the provisions of this  Stipulation,  as contemplated in the attached  exhibits,
incorporated herein by reference.

     35. The Court shall retain  jurisdiction with respect to the enforcement of
the terms of this Stipulation and the Settlement embodied herein.

     36.  The  section   headings  used  throughout  this  Stipulation  are  for
convenience only and shall not effect the interpretation or construction of this
Stipulation.

     37. In the event the Court or any other court is called  upon to  interpret
this  Stipulation,  no one  party or group of  parties  shall be  deemed to have
drafted this Stipulation,  nor may any party offer in evidence or otherwise use,
for purposes of suggesting any  interpretation  of this  Stipulation,  any prior
drafts of this Stipulation.

     38.  Nothing  in  this  Stipulation,  Settlement,  or the  negotiations  or
proceedings  relating  to the  foregoing  is  intended  to or shall be deemed to
constitute a waiver of any applicable privilege or immunity,  including, without
limitation, the accountants' privilege, the attorney-client privilege, the joint
defense privilege, or the work product immunity.

                      [SIGNATURES FOLLOW ON THE NEXT PAGE]

                                       23



                               PLAINTIFF DAVID GROGAN, by and through his
                               counsel:



                               /s/ Gregory E. Keller
                               -------------------------------------------
                               Gregory E. Keller
                               Harnes & Keller LLP
                               964 Third Avenue, 7th Floor
                               New York, NY 10022
                               -and-
                               James M. Crabtree
                               Crabtree Law Office
                               13420 Santa Fe Trail Drive
                               Lenexa, KS 66215




                               PLAINTIFF LEWIS F. GEER, by and
                               through his counsel:



                               /s/ James G. Flynn
                               -------------------------------------------
                               Robert I. Harwood
                               James G. Flynn
                               Wechsler Harwood LLP
                               488 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor
                               New York, NY 10022
                                      -and-
                               James M. Crabtree
                               Crabtree Law Office
                               13420 Santa Fe Trail Drive
                               Lenexa, KS 66215



                                       24



                               DEFENDANTS WILLIAM D. COX; HAROLD
                               C. HILL, JR.; ROY R. LABORDE;
                               TIMOTHY P. O'NEIL; CLARK D.
                               STEWART; and DAVID TAGGART, by
                               and through their counsel:



                               /s/ Matthew J. Salzman
                               -------------------------------------------
                               Matthew J. Salzman
                               John G. Hansen
                               Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP
                               1201 Walnut Street
                               Kansas City, Missouri 64106




                               DEFENDANT TRANSFINANCIAL
                               HOLDINGS, INC., by and through
                               its counsel:



                               /s/ Timothy M. O'Brien
                               -------------------------------------------
                               Timothy M. O'Brien
                               Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
                               84 Corporate Woods
                               10801 Mastin, Suite 1000
                               Overland Park, KS 66210-1669




                               R. L. R. INVESTMENTS, LLC and R&L TRANSFER, INC.,
                               by and through its counsel:



                               /s/ David R. Buchanan
                               -------------------------------------------
                               David R. Buchanan
                               Brown & James, P.C.
                               1900 City Center Square
                               1100 Main Street-2153
                               Kansas City, MO 64105


                                       25



                                INDEX OF EXHIBITS
                                -----------------


     A.   Preliminary Approval and Scheduling Order

     B.   Notice of Proposed Settlement of Derivative and Class Actions, Request
          for Attorneys'  Fees and  Reimbursement  of Expenses,  and  Settlement
          Fairness Hearing

     C.   Proof of Claim

     D.   Summary Notice for Publication  of Settlement of Derivative  and Class
          Actions

     E.   Final Order




                                       26