FORM 10-K

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 27, 1997

[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to ___________
Commission file number: 0-21892

Pinnacle Micro, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 33-0238563
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

140 Technology Drive, Suite 500
Irvine, CA 92618
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

949-789-3000
(Registrant's telephone number including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [_] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [_]

As of June 18, 1998, 14,500,089 shares of the Registrant's Common Stock were
outstanding. As of June 18, 1998, the aggregate market value of the
Registrant's Common Stock, held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was
approximately $3,045,000 based on the closing sales price of $ 0.21 per share of
the Common Stock as of such date, as reported by the Pink Sheets published by
the National Quotation Service.

Page 1 of 52 pages

PART I
------

This Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. Actual results and events could differ materially from those projected
as a result of many factors, including but not limited to the risk factors
stated here and through this Report.

Item 1. Business
--------

General

Pinnacle Micro, Inc., (the "Company") is a designer, supplier and
reseller of removable optical storage systems. The Company's products read from
and write data to optical media. In 1996, the Company changed its core business
from reselling products manufactured by others to research, development and
manufacturing. During 1997, the Company closed its research and development
capabilities and all personnel associated with just the research and development
activities left the Company. The Company's manufactured products range from the
Vertex 2.6 GB ("GB") drive to its 4.5 terabyte multiple disk optical library
systems ("optical library"). The Company resells under its own brand name
compact disc ("CD") recording systems manufactured by others.

The Company was incorporated in California in May 1987 and
reincorporated in Delaware in May 1993. The Company's headquarters and
operations are located at 140 Technology Drive, Suite 500, Irvine, California
92618, and its telephone number is (714) 789-3000.

Significant Risk Factors

Readers of this Report should carefully consider, in addition to the
other information contained in this Report, the following:

Losses, Liquidity and Capital Resources

As a result of continuing significant losses, the Company has
experienced difficulty in paying its trade debt on a timely basis. The Company
sought the cooperation of its creditors in a restructuring of its trade debt in
July 1997. A committee of the creditors, representing in excess of 50% of the
Company's trade debt, was formed. The committee has agreed to several
moratoriums on the payment of the Company's outstanding unsecured debt. The
Company is currently operating under an informal moratorium with no defined
termination date. No assurance can be given that the creditors' committee will
continue the moratorium. In the event the Company is unable to obtain additional
extensions of the moratorium it will be unable to continue to operate as a going
concern and will seek protection under the Federal bankruptcy laws.

Concurrent with the change in management that occurred in August 1997,
the Company retained a new financial management and consulting firm to assist it
in restructuring the Company and identifying sources of financing and in
providing supplemental support to the Company's financial management and
accounting functions. There can be no assurance that sources of financing can be
identified or that any financing transaction can be consummated under terms
which will allow the Company to continue to operate as a going concern.

There is no forbearance agreement in place with the Company's secured
lender and none is currently expected to be executed, although the Company's
secured lender has continued to provide borrowings to the Company. The Company
has been actively soliciting the involvement of alternative lenders. There can
be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful in finding a
replacement lender or that its current lender will continue to provide funding
for the Company's operating needs. The Company has borrowed amounts from its
secured lender that exceed the amounts permitted as calculated using the
Company's eligible borrowing base under its line of credit. While the lender
has cooperated thus far with the Company's efforts to meet its ongoing working
capital requirements, there can be no assurance that such cooperation will
continue. In the event the Company is declared in default under the line of
credit by the lender and demand for payment is made, the Company would be unable
to make such payment, will be unable to continue to operate as a going concern
and will seek protection under the Federal bankruptcy laws. See "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

Changes in Management.

The Company experienced significant turnover in its senior management in
1997. Although the Company's founder, William F. Blum, returned to active
management of the Company in August 1997, there can be no assurance that the
cumulative effects of management turnover will not have a negative effect on the
Company's operations and financial results or that the restructuring efforts
will be successful.

Technological Competition

The computer industry in general, and the market for the Company's
products in particular, is characterized by rapidly changing technology,
evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions and significant
price competition, resulting in short product life cycles and reductions in unit
selling prices over the life of a specific product. Given the Company's limited
working capital resources, which are currently preventing the Company from
developing its own new products, new product availability from OEMs is of
fundamental importance to the Company's prospects. The announcement,
introduction or market expectation of new products based on new or enhanced
technologies, the emergence of new industry standards, widely accepted operating
systems or significant price reductions on competitors' products may adversely
affect the sales and prices of the Company's products and the Company's results
of operations.

There can be no assurance that there will be continued acceptance of the
Company's existing products or that the Company's future products will achieve
market acceptance at acceptable margins. There can be no assurance that the
Company will not experience significant delays in the introduction of new
products in the future, as it has in the past, which could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's results of operations.

Fluctuations in Quarterly Operating Results

The Company's quarterly operating results can fluctuate significantly
depending on factors such as timing of product introductions by the Company and
its competitors, market acceptance of new products, changes in pricing policies
by the Company and its competitors, currency fluctuations and the timing of
expenditures on advertising and promotion. In addition, the Company's product
purchases, component purchases, production and spending levels are made based
upon forecasted demand for the Company's products. Any significant shortfall in
forecasted demand could have an immediate adverse impact on the Company's
quarterly results of operations and financial condition. Past results are not
necessarily indicative of future performance for any particular period,
especially given the fundamental changes in the Company's business in 1997, and
there can be no assurance that the Company will experience revenue growth and
profitability in future periods.

International Trade, Foreign Exchange Dependent Purchases; Currency Fluctuations

The risks of international trade include foreign government regulation, the
difficulties of finding and retaining competent management, miscommunication,
local preferences and changes in taxes and duties. The Company's optical
mechanical storage subassembly ("OMA") suppliers, media suppliers and a number
of the Company's other component suppliers are located in Japan, which subjects
the Company to risks of changes in government policies and regulatory
requirements, transportation delays and the imposition of tariffs and export
controls. In the past the Company experienced losses arising from changes in
the Japanese Yen vs. U.S. dollar exchange rates. Although the Company's
purchases and sales are now dollar denominated, there can be no assurance that
the Company's future results of operations will not be adversely affected by
currency fluctuations.

Products

Magneto Optical Products

The Company's Magneto Optical ("MO") drive products combine proprietary
firmware, electronics design, application specific integrated circuits ("ASICs")
with optical OMA's manufactured by a third party. The Company's core technology
and lead product is the Apex 4.6 GB 5.25" MO Drive. The Vertex 2.6 GB product
is based upon the Apex technology. The Company's optical storage systems are
compatible with most personal computer and workstation operating systems,
including Windows NT, Windows 95, Macintosh OS, DOS, Windows and UNIX. External
systems attach to a computer system and include a power supply, OMA, drive
electronics, firmware, software, a SCSI cable and, where necessary, a SCSI
interface card. Internal systems do not include a power supply. The Company
provides a one year

warranty against defects in material and workmanship for all of its products.
The Company's 3.5" 640 MB Tahoe product was discontinued in 1997.

The Apex and Vertex optical storage systems conform to certain industry
standards, which allow for disk interchangeability among 2.6 GB MO systems and
compatibility with future generations of 3.5" and 5.25" systems, respectively.
The Company's Apex 4.6 GB product also reads 2.0 GB media, but not lower
capacity media.

Network Optical Library Systems

The Company also manufactures and sells a line of optical libraries based
on its Apex technology with storage capacities ranging from 75 GB to 4.5
terabytes. The library mechanisms are obtained from third party suppliers and
are integrated by the Company into its library systems. These library systems
are most often used in client/server or other networked environments and are
free standing, fully enclosed units with robotic arms that move 5.25" optical
disks to and from one or more internally mounted drives. A significant number
of Apex libraries were sold in 1997.

CD Recorder Systems

The Company distributes compact disc-recorder ("CD-R") systems under its
own brand name and has done so since 1993. The Company's CD-R systems are
comprised of drive assemblies manufactured by third-party suppliers, which the
Company differentiates from products of its competitors through added software
and packaging. The Recordable Compact Disc ("RCD") 4x12 replaced the RCD 4x4 in
1997. The current product, introduced in the fourth quarter of 1997, is the RCD
4x12. CD-R products are combined with Adaptec's "EZCD Pro" software for PC
environments and Adaptec's "Toast" software for the Macintosh environment. CD-R
systems are used to create custom CDs for low volume data reproduction and
distribution. CDs created in a standardized "ISO 9660" format can be utilized in
most CD-ROM drives and players. The CD-R can be used with Macintosh, IBM, and
Unix compatible personal computers.

"Ready to Store" RTS Program

The Company's independent software vendors ("ISV") program is intended to
assure compatibility between the Company's products and important software
products, in order to increase market acceptance of Apex technology. The
Company improved software compatibility and certification in 1997, as optical
library purchases often depend first on software selection. Participants
included Avail Systems, Dantz, FileNet Corporation, Keyfile, KOM, Micro Design
International, Inc., Optical Technology Group, Inc., Optika Imaging Systems,
Inc., Optisys, Inc., Pegasus Disk Technologies, Inc., Seagate Software, Inc.,
Software Architects, Tracer Technologies, Inc., and Watermark Software, Inc.

Optical Storage Media

In 1997, the Company distributed and sold rewritable 3.5" and 5.25" optical
storage media with an unformatted capacity of 230, 540 and 640 MB (3.5") and
1.2, 1.3 GB, 2.3, 2.6 GB, 4.2 and 4.6 GB (5.25"), for use with the Company's and
other manufacturers' MO systems. In 1997, the Company discontinued sales of 230
and 640 MB 3.5" media and sales of 650 MB, 1.3 GB 5.25" media. The Company sells
proprietary media for the Apex products as well as industry standard 2.6 GB
media for the Vertex and Apex. The Company also markets and sells recordable CD
media for use with its CD-R products.

The Company's 5.25" optical storage system conforms to standards that
have been adopted by the International Standards Organization (ISO), the
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the European Computer
Manufacturers Association (ECMA). These standards allow for disk
interchangeability among systems and compatibility with future generation
systems based on the same media dimensions. Company's Apex 4.6 GB drive system
and media do not conform to such standards. The Vertex media is ANSI/ISO
compliant, but it is not ECMA compliant. The Company purchases all media from
third party suppliers and resells the media under Company trademarks.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution

Market and industry trends are toward ever-increasing memory and storage
capacity. The Apex technology is a removable, rewritable and reliable solution,
for near on-line and archival storage. Markets for Apex technology include
archiving, desk top publishing, multi-media, graphic design, medical imaging,
network storage, near on-line storage and other data-intensive uses.

The Company sells its products through distributors, catalogs, value-added
resellers ("VARs") and systems integrators. The Company also sells to end users
directly through its internal sales force. The Company's distributor channel
consists both of one national and one value added distributor. In addition, The
Company sells through many catalogs and through regional distributors. One
distributor, Ingram Micro, Inc., accounted for approximately 23%, 18%, and 15%
of net sales in 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively. No other customer accounted
for more than 10% of the Company's net sales during these periods. During the
latter part of 1997, the Company discontinued selling to two national
distributors, including Ingram Micro, Inc., and currently sells its products
through only one national distributor.

In conformance with industry practice, the Company generally provides
distributors with stock balancing and price protection rights. This permits
distributors to return slow moving products to the Company for credit and
provides price adjustments for inventories of the Company's products held by
distributors if the Company subsequently lowers the prices of those products.

The Company's international sales are made through a network of
distributors and resellers, which market and distribute the Company's products
worldwide. International and export sales accounted for approximately 13%, 30%,
and 35% of net sales in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. (See Note 12 of Notes
to Financial Statements). Until October 1997, the Company had an international
sales office located in the Netherlands. This office was closed in the fourth
quarter of 1997 as a cost savings measure. In February 1998 the Company signed
an exclusive master distribution agreement with Dennis Bergstrom, AB
("Bergstrom"), a Scandinavian-based distributor, that gives Bergstrom exclusive
distribution rights for the Company's products throughout Europe. Other
international sales are made through distributors and resellers in other, non-
European countries. All sales made by the Company are denominated in U. S.
Dollars. The risks of international sales include, among other things, finding
and retaining good customers, local or regional competition, currency
fluctuations that can affect demand for the Company's products, export and
import controls and government regulation and tariffs.

Customer service (order fulfillment) and technical support of the Company's
products are an integral part of the Company's business. During the third and
fourth quarters of 1997, the Company contracted with outside service providers
to provide professional order fulfillment and technical support.

Research and Development

Prior to October 1997, the Company operated a research and development
facility in Colorado Springs, Colorado, which developed proprietary optical
technology, including systems, mechanical, firmware, electronics design and
ASICs. During October and November 1997, the Company closed the Colorado Springs
facility because the Company no longer had the financial resources to invest in
research and development. All personnel associated with just the research and
development activities have left the Company The Company intends to continue to
source and sell products manufactured by other companies, as it has always done.
The Apex/Vertex products and related media currently being sold by the Company
accounted for approximately 71% of the total sales for 1997.

In 1997, 1996 and 1995 the Company's research and development expenditures
were approximately $2,984,000, $6,006,000 and $4,978,000, respectively. These
expenses related primarily to the operations of the Company's engineering team
located in Colorado Springs, Colorado until the latter part of 1997 when that
operation was closed.

Through the third quarter of 1997, the Company had manufacturing facilities
in Irvine, California and Colorado Springs, Colorado, although the Irvine
facility had not been used for manufacturing since the fourth quarter of 1996.
All manufacturing and research and development activities were performed in
Colorado Springs after the new facility was completed in the first quarter of
1997. The Company's manufacturing operations consisted of final assembly and
testing, quality assurance, packaging and shipping. In October 1997, the Company
outsourced all manufacturing to an unrelated company in California and the
Colorado Springs operation was closed in the same month.

Suppliers

OMAs, Apex media and certain of the ASICs and other components used in
the Company's products are obtained from single sources. The Company also
purchases from third party suppliers circuit boards, integrated circuits and
other components used in its products. Since October 1997, the Company has
outsourced its manufacturing and fulfillment operations to unrelated companies.
The Company's dependence on third-party suppliers and service providers involves
several risks, including limited bargaining power over pricing, availability,
quality and delivery schedules for components.

There is also the risk that a large supplier may be using the Company to develop
a market for later entry by the supplier. The Company believes that second
sources are available for all components other than OMAs, Apex media and certain
integrated circuits. There can, however, be no assurance that the Company could
obtain all required components from second sources on terms as favorable as
those in place, if at all. If the Company's ability to obtain critical
components from its sole source suppliers for its products were impaired or
interrupted for any reason, the Company would not be able to establish
alternative sources and integrate replacement components into its systems
without substantial disruption to the Company's operations.

Inventory

During 1997 the Company's inventories decreased significantly. The
decrease was a result of the Company's reduced sales and the establishment of
reserves for excess and obsolescence of component and sub-assembly inventories
to amounts consistent with the Company's current sales levels and expectations
for future sales. In addition, the Company sold at a significant loss portions
of its spare parts inventories to its provider of outsourced product repair
capabilities. Other spare parts inventories were reserved to zero value to
reflect the relatively short product life cycles of the Company's products which
reduces opportunities for revenue generating, out of warranty repair service
revenues.

Backlog

As is the case with other companies in the electronics industry, the
Company does not believe that backlog amounts are meaningful indicators of
future revenues unless such backlog amounts are caused by new product
introductions. During 1997 the Company did not introduce any major new
products.

Competition

The market for data storage products is competitive and changing,
characterized by price erosion and short product life cycles. The Company's
products compete directly with other optical storage products and removable
storage products. Competition also comes from storage products based on
alternative technologies such as hard disk drives and tape drives. The
Company's optical storage systems compete directly with those manufactured by
Sony Corporation, Hitachi, Ltd., Hewlett-Packard Company, Fujitsu Ltd.,
Panasonic, Iomega, Syquest, Nikon, Ricoh, Ltd., Phillips, N.V. and others. All
of these companies have larger technical staffs, greater brand name recognition
and market presence, larger marketing and sales organizations and greater
financial resources than those of the Company. Certain of the Company's
suppliers of mechanical optical storage subassemblies also develop and market
optical storage systems that compete with those of the Company. Potential
direct competitors include certain computer storage peripheral manufacturers and
business storage systems manufacturers or developers, who may introduce optical
storage products or incorporate a competitive product in their own products.
The major competitive factors in the data storage market include product
performance, capacity, price, size and appearance, reliability, as well as the
timing of new product introductions. There can be no assurance that products
based on competing technologies will not have an adverse effect on the market
for optical data storage products.

While the Company believes that its optical storage products should
compete favorably for applications that require removable, reliable, random
access storage, certain other products such as hard disk drives, tape drives or
other alternative storage technologies, separately or together in various
combinations, may compete more favorably for other applications. Hard disk
drives and tape drives may be less costly alternatives where removable storage
and data security are not required. The optical storage market is still
developing. Hard disk drives compete in cost per megabyte. In the optical
media market, the Company competes as a reseller with a number of other
companies, primarily on the basis of price/performance and purchasing
convenience. Optical media manufacturing is limited to a few companies whose
future decisions may affect the Company's media business. The Company's single
source supplier of optical media for the Apex product also competes against the
Company by selling comparable products. There can be no assurance that the
Company will be able to compete successfully with manufacturers and other
resellers of optical storage products and media or that competition will not
have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations.

Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights

The Company seeks to obtain the appropriate proprietary rights
protection for new technology it develops. The Company attempts to protect its
trade secrets and other proprietary information through agreements with
customers and suppliers, proprietary information agreements with employees and
consultants and other security measures. There can be no assurance that the
Company will be successful in protecting its proprietary technology. Actual
protection and its assumed benefits may differ materially from Company goals as
a result of the intellectual property rights and licensing strategies of the
Company's competitors and of other licensors.

Certain of the Company's products are subject to patents or
intellectual property rights held by third parties. The Company seeks and
obtains license rights, including indemnification against infringement of such
patents or intellectual property rights, as necessary. The high technology
industry, including the data storage industry, has seen a great increase in
patent and related litigation in the past decade. Other entities may hold
patents or have applications on file, which, if valid or enforced, could
adversely affect the Company's use of certain of its technologies and processes.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining
acceptable license rights and terms if in fact licenses are necessary. The
Company anticipates that it may have continuing obligations and expenses related
to licensing third party technology. There can be no assurance that third
parties will not assert infringement claims against the Company in the future or
that any such assertion may not require the Company to enter into royalty
arrangements or costly litigation.

The Company has patent applications pending in the United States and
intends to file additional patent applications relating to the designs employed
within certain of its products, both hardware and software. There can, however,
be no assurance that any patents applied for will be granted.

Employees

As of June 18, 1998, the Company employed 25 full-time employees.
There was a significant turnover in employees in 1997 as a result of the massive
restructurings undertaken by the Company in that year. The Company's relocation
of its manufacturing and financial operations to Colorado Springs, Colorado and
subsequent return to Irvine, California during 1997 and the implementation of
outsourcing of accounting and financial management, manufacturing, technical
support, in and out of warranty product repair services and fulfillment, all
resulted in significant reductions in headcount. In addition, the closing of
the Colorado Springs research and development facility resulted in the
elimination of

all research and development positions. The Company's current employees are
engaged in sales and administrative activities and management of the Company's
outsourced activities. The Company's employees are not represented by any
collective bargaining agreements, and the Company has never experienced a work
stoppage. There can be no assurances that further turnover of key employees
will not occur. The loss of the remaining key employees could have a material
adverse impact on the Company.

Item 2. Properties
----------

The Company leases and occupies an 11,180 square foot facility in
Irvine, California. The lease for this facility expires November 30, 1999 .

Item 3. Legal Proceedings
-----------------

On March 15, 1996, a complaint was filed against the Company and certain of
its current and then directors and executive officers in a securities class
action lawsuit which alleges that Company management engaged in improper
accounting practices and made certain false and misleading statements. The
complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District
of California under the case name Wills, Cohen, et al. v. William Blum et al.,
Case No. SACV96-261GLT. On or about November 10, 1997, the Company reached an
agreement in principle with the plaintiffs to settle the lawsuit. Plaintiffs
have agreed to accept payment of $2,325,000 in exchange for a complete release
of all claims arising from the allegations set forth in the plaintiffs'
complaint. All of the terms of the settlement are not final, and the settlement
is subject to preliminary and final approval by Court as well as approval by the
members of the class. The Company's insurers have agreed to advance all
settlement and defense costs, including the Company's attorneys' fees and
expenses, subject to the Company's agreement to reimburse the insurers for up to
approximately $577,000 of those settlement and defense costs if the Company
achieves certain positive financial results prior to the Federal Court's final
approval of the settlement. Although the Company does not concede that any
portion of the class action settlement is allocable to the Company, the Company
has agreed to the terms of the settlement to avoid further costs. The Company's
portion of the settlement, which totaled $232,000, has been included in the
results of operations for the fourth quarter ended December 27, 1997.

The Company and certain members and former members of its senior management
were the subject of an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "SEC") relating principally to the restatement of the Company's previously
reported financial results for 1993 and 1994. During the fourth quarter of 1997,
the investigation conducted by the SEC relating principally to the restatement
of the Company's previously reported financial results for 1993 and 1994 and for
certain interim periods for 1995 involving the Company and certain former
members of its senior management was concluded. The Commission instituted a
cease and desist order against the Company and two former officers and a
permanent injunction barring future violations of certain accounting provisions
against a third former officer, who was also fined $25,000.

The resignation of the Company's prior independent public accountants on
February 20, 1996, led to additional inquiries by the SEC. These inquiries
related principally to the accounting matters discussed in Note 13 of Notes to
Financial Statements (1995 adjustments). The inquiries by the SEC were
concluded as part of the resolution of the SEC's investigation as described in
the previous paragraph.

Numerous judgments have been obtained by certain creditors demanding
payment of past due obligations. In the opinion of counsel for the Company,
attempts to collect against these judgments would not be successful because of
prior lien recorded by the Company's secured lender and by the Credit Managers
Association of California on behalf of all of the Company's unsecured creditors.

The Company is also subject to other legal proceedings and claims that
arise in the normal course of business. While the outcome of these proceedings
cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that the
outcome of these other legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the
Company's financial statements.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
---------------------------------------------------

No matters were submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year
covered by this report to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation
of proxies or otherwise.

PART II
-------

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
---------------------------------------------------------------------

The Company's common stock is traded on the Pink Sheets published by the
National Quotation Service under the symbol PNCL. From July 1, 1993 until
February 4, 1998, the Company's common stock was traded on the NASDAQ National
Market System. On February 4, 1998, the company's common stock was delisted from
the NASDAQ National Market System because of non-compliance with NASDAQ's
listing criteria. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
range of high and low bid prices for the Company's common stock. These prices do
not include adjustments for retail mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions.

High Low

1996: 1st Quarter $16.500 $7.250
2nd Quarter 12.000 6.625
3rd Quarter 9.000 4.875
4th Quarter 8.750 2.000
1997: 1st Quarter 7.813 2.375
2nd Quarter 2.750 .969
3rd Quarter 1.531 .594
4th Quarter .938 .125

There were 1,012 security holders of record as of June 4, 1998. Other
than S Corporation distributions to the Company's stockholders in connection
with the termination of the Company's S Corporation status on July 1, 1993, the
Company has not paid cash dividends and intends to retain earnings, if any, for
use in the business for the foreseeable future. Under the terms of the
Company's revolving line of credit agreement (see Note 5 of the Notes to
Financial Statements), the Company is contractually restricted from paying cash
dividends.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data
-----------------------

THE COMPANY HAS BEEN UNABLE TO OBTAIN AN AUDIT OPINION ON THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1997, FROM ITS
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR PRINCIPALLY AS A RESULT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONCERN
OVER THE ABILITY OF THE COMPANY TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN. CONSEQUENTLY,
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO AND SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1997 HEREIN CONTAINED ARE PRESENTED AS UNAUDITED. THE
READER OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, NOTES, SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA, AND
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE LACK OF AN INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
ATTESTATION TO THE FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY
FOR DECEMBER 27, 1997 PRESENTED IN THIS FORM 10-K. THIS REPORT ON FORM 10-K IS
BEING FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH THE COMPANY'S REPORTS ON FORM 10-Q FOR EACH OF THE
QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, JUNE 30, 1998 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1998. THIS REPORT
ON FORM 10-K SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ABOVE-NOTED FILINGS, AS WELL
AS ALL REPORTS ON FORM 8-K FILED BY THE COMPANY SUBSEQUENT TO DECEMBER 27, 1997,
FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING CHANGES IN THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS, PRODUCTS,
MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL CONDITION, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND OTHER EVENTS WHICH
HAVE OCCURRED SUBSEQUENT TO THE PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT.

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with
the Financial Statements and the accompanying notes and the management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
appearing elsewhere herein. The statement of operations data and the balance
sheet for the years ended December 27, 1997 is derived from unaudited results as
more fully described above. The statement of operations data for the years
ended December 28, 1996 and December 30, 1995, and the balance sheet data at
December 28, 1996, is derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the
audited financial statements included elsewhere herein. The statement of
operations data set forth below with respect to 1994 and 1993 and the balance
sheet data at December 30, 1995, December 31, 1994 and December 31, 1993, is
derived from unaudited financial statements not included in this Form 10-K.

Fiscal Year Ended Dec. 27, Dec. 28, Dec. 30, Dec. 31, Dec. 31,
In thousands except per share data 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(UNAUDITED)

Statement of Operations Data:
Net sales......................................... $ 31,124 $ 59,921 $81,844 $65,382 $38,887
Gross profit (loss)............................... (8,736) 11,829 21,952 19,784 11,990
Income (loss) from operations..................... (28,579) (18,463) (3,274) 4,231 1,267
Net income (loss)................................. (30,229) (20,833) (2,459) 2,736 1,629
Net income (loss) per share (1)................... (2.32) (2.52) (0.31) 0.35 -

Pro Forma Statement of Operations Data (2):
Pro forma net income.............................. $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 858
Supplementary pro forma net income per share (1).. - - - - 0.12

Dec. 27, Dec. 28, Dec. 30, Dec. 31, Dec. 31,
In thousands 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(UNAUDITED)
Balance Sheet Data:
Working capital (deficiency)...................... $(15,928) $ 12,710 $15,527 $17,105 $14,787
Total assets...................................... 12,544 40,238 32,005 28,855 22,129
Notes payable and long-term debt.................. 6,166 9,698 - 1,439 55
Stockholders' equity (deficit).................... (15,470) 8,503 16,741 18,911 15,814

(1) The net income (loss) per share and the supplementary pro forma net income
per share have been retroactively restated to reflect the 1995 stock
dividend. (See Note 7 of Notes to Financial Statements).

(2) Effective May 1, 1989, the Company elected to be taxed as an S Corporation.
Accordingly, the provisions for income taxes for the periods from May 1989
to June 30, 1993 were computed by applying the California franchise tax
rate for S Corporations of 2.5% to pretax earnings. The pro forma data are
unaudited and reflect provisions for federal and state income taxes
(assuming an

effective tax rate of 36.3% for the year ended December 31, 1993) as if the
Company had not elected to be treated as an S Corporation during that
period. In accordance with a regulation of the SEC, the pro forma net
income per share for the year ended December 31, 1993 reflects the effect
of an assumed issuance of 301,352 average shares at the initial public
offering price of $7.00 per share, which would have generated sufficient
cash to pay an S Corporation distribution in an amount equal to retained
earnings at June 30, 1993.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations
---------------------

This Section contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. Actual results and events could differ materially from those projected
in the forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including but not
limited to the risk factors stated here and throughout this Report.

THE COMPANY HAS BEEN UNABLE TO OBTAIN AN AUDIT OPINION ON THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1997 FROM ITS
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR PRINCIPALLY AS A RESULT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONCERN
OVER THE ABILITY OF THE COMPANY TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN. CONSEQUENTLY,
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO AND SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA, HEREIN
CONTAINED ARE PRESENTED AS UNAUDITED. THE READER OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS,
NOTES, SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA, AND MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE LACK
OF AN INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ATTESTATION TO THE FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY FOR DECEMBER 27, 1997 PRESENTED IN THIS FORM 10-K.
THIS REPORT ON FORM 10-K IS BEING FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH THE COMPANY'S REPORTS
ON FORM 10-Q FOR EACH OF THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, JUNE 30, 1998 AND
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998. THIS REPORT ON FORM 10-K SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH
THE ABOVE-NOTED FILINGS, AS WELL AS ALL REPORTS ON FORM 8-K FILED BY THE COMPANY
SUBSEQUENT TO DECEMBER 27, 1997, FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING CHANGES IN THE
COMPANY'S BUSINESS, PRODUCTS, MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL CONDITION, RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS AND OTHER EVENTS WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SUBSEQUENT TO THE PERIOD COVERED
BY THIS REPORT.

General

In 1997, the Company incurred a net loss of $30,229,000 on total sales of
$31,124,000. The year 1997 was one of significant and critically serious
problems for the Company, which continue to the date of this Form 10-K. The
Company continues to incur significant losses and quarterly sales remain
significantly below historical levels and those levels required for
profitability. As of December 27, 1997, the Company's liabilities exceeded its
assets by $15,470,000. The Company's liquidity position continues to be
severely constrained. As of December 27, 1997, the Company's working capital
deficiency was $15,928,000. The Company was unsuccessful in its attempt to
transition from a reseller of OEM products to an engineering and manufacturing
company and it was, accordingly, forced to abandon its research and development
and manufacturing capabilities during 1997.

Significant events affecting the Company in 1997 included:

During 1997 net sales declined significantly from quarter to quarter and
were materially below sales levels for the prior year quarters. Quarterly losses
were significant and caused the Company to be unable to pay its unsecured
creditors and to be out of compliance with the terms of its agreements with its
secured lender.

In June 1997, the Company received an income tax refund of $1,035,000 and
in August 1997 it received the balance of the refund of $949,000 from the carry
back of losses for 1996 and 1995 to prior years. These funds were used for
operations.

During the second quarter of 1997 the Company retained a turnaround and
management consulting firm and a law firm to assist the Company in dealing with
various creditors and related matters. The Company also engaged an investment
banking firm to assist the Company in evaluating its alternatives, including the
possibility of locating a financial or industry partner or other transaction.
The Company has continued to retain the services of the law firm but the Company
no longer retains the turnaround and management consulting firm. The investment
banking firm was not successful in its efforts to locate a financial or industry
partner nor was it successful in identifying other transactions that could
materially benefit the Company. Concurrent with the change in management that
occurred in August 1997, the Company retained a new financial management and
consulting firm to assist it in restructuring the Company and identifying
sources of financing and in providing supplemental support to the Company's
financial management and accounting functions. There can be no assurance that
sources of financing can be identified or that any financing transaction can be
consummated under terms which will allow the Company to continue to operate as a
going concern.

As a result of the Company's difficulty in paying its trade debt on a
timely basis because of its severe liquidity problems, the Company sought the
cooperation of its creditors in a restructuring of its trade debt in July, 1997.
The Company held a meeting with its trade creditors and a committee of the
creditors, representing in excess of 50% of the Company's trade debt, was
formed. The committee initially agreed to a 60-day moratorium on the payment of
the Company's outstanding trade debt. There were subsequent extensions of the
moratorium and the Company currently is operating under an informal moratorium
with no defined termination date. No assurance can be given that the creditors'
committee will continue the moratorium. In the event the Company is unable to
obtain additional extensions of the moratorium it will seek protection under
the Federal bankruptcy laws.

Until the end of the third quarter ended September 27, 1997, the Company
maintained manufacturing facilities in both California and Colorado, both of
which were underutilized. The overhead costs associated with those facilities
contributed significantly to the Company's losses for 1997. Because sales
declined significantly and were not expected to increase significantly in the
foreseeable future, during the third quarter ended September 27, 1997, the
Company's management concluded that the Colorado Springs facility was in excess
of the Company's needs. In addition, the Company's weakened financial condition
required it to consolidate facilities and to reduce all costs to those minimum
levels consistent with the reduced sales outlook. As a result of these factors,
the Company undertook a restructuring which included significant workforce
reductions in both its Irvine, California and Colorado Springs facilities.
During the fourth quarter ended December 27, 1997, the Company outsourced
certain operations such as assembly, fulfillment, technical support, repair
services, and financial management and accounting. Marketing responsibilities
were outsourced to a firm owned by co-founder Scott A. Blum, the son of William
F. Blum, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company. The Colorado operation was closed and virtually all
personnel associated with the facility left the Company. Also, in October 1997,
the Company reached agreement with the lessor of its California facility to
permit the Company to vacate its then California facility by December 31, 1997.
The Company obtained a substantially smaller facility (approximately 11,000
square feet) which is sufficient for its current needs in Irvine, California
into which it relocated during the month of December 1997. These restructuring
actions resulted in significant one-time charges totaling $2,087,000, which were
included in the results of operations for 1997. (See Note 8 of Notes to
Financial Statements)

The Company's liquidity position continues to be severely constrained. The
Company currently has a revolving line of credit agreement with a lender,
collateralized by substantially all assets of the Company. Although the Company
has a maximum availability of $10,000,000 under the line of credit based on a
percentage of eligible accounts receivables and inventories, its ability to
borrow against the revolving line of credit is largely dependent upon its level
of eligible accounts receivable. Because of its lower than expected level of
shipments, the Company's eligible account receivables are also lower than
expected and the Company frequently has exceeded the maximum available under the
line of credit. At June 18, 1998, the Company had borrowed in excess of its
available credit under the line.

There is no forbearance agreement in place with the Company's secured
lender, although the Company's secured lender has continued to provide
borrowings to the Company. The Company has borrowed amounts from its secured
lender that exceed the amounts permitted as calculated using the Company's
eligible borrowing base under its line of credit. The Company is also in
default under other provisions of the agreement relating to its line of credit.
While the lender has cooperated so far with the Company's efforts to meet its
ongoing working capital requirements, there can be no assurance that such
cooperation will continue. In the event the Company is declared in default
under the line of credit by the lender and demand for payment is made, the
Company would be unable to make such payment. In the event that the Company is
unable to locate other sources of funding to meet its current cash needs, it
willthen be unable to continue to operate as a going concern and will seek
protection under the Federal bankruptcy laws.

During the third quarter ended September 27, 1997, the Company
significantly changed its senior management. William F. Blum, co-founder, was
named Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in August 1997. Roger Hay, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and a director resigned from both
positions in August 1997 and William F. Blum added the position of Chief
Financial Officer to his responsibilities. Kenneth C. Campbell resigned in
September 1997 as President and a director and William F. Blum was appointed the
Company's President.

In the fourth quarter ended December 27, 1997, the Company terminated its
remaining consultants and employees associated with its European sales office.
In early 1998, the Company reached an arrangement with a European distributor to
become the master distributor for the Company's products throughout Europe.

In the fourth quarter ended December 27, 1997, the Company discontinued its
development efforts for the follow-on product to the Apex drive, the Apex II.
All personnel associated with that development project left the Company's
employ. The inability to have a follow-on product for the Apex could have a
materially negative effect on the Company's ability to sell its current
inventory of the Apex product and could require significant write-downs of its
inventories, further impairing

the Company's ability to obtain financing. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources"
below for more information concerning the Company's capital needs.

During October 1997, Bruce P. Bastl and James B. Roszak joined the
Company's Board of Directors to fill existing vacancies on the Board.

In the fourth quarter ended December 27, 1997, the investigation conducted
by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating principally to the
restatement of the Company's previously reported financial results for 1993 and
1994 and for certain interim periods for 1995 involving the Company and certain
former members of its senior management was concluded. The Commission
instituted a cease and desist order against the Company and two former officers
and a permanent injunction barring future violations of certain accounting
provisions against a third former officer, who was also fined $25,000.

On March 15, 1996, a complaint was filed against the Company and certain of
its current and then directors and executive officers in a securities class
action lawsuit which alleges that Company management engaged in improper
accounting practices and made certain false and misleading statements. The
complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District
of California under the case name Wills, Cohen, et al. v. William Blum et al.,
Case No. SACV96-261GLT. On or about November 10, 1997, the Company reached an
agreement in principle with the plaintiffs to settle the lawsuit. Plaintiffs
have agreed to accept payment of $2,325,000 in exchange for a complete release
of all claims arising from the allegations set forth in the plaintiffs'
complaint. All of the terms of the settlement are not final, and the settlement
is subject to preliminary and final approval by the Court as well as approval by
the members of the class. The Company's insurers have agreed to advance all
settlement and defense costs, including the Company's attorneys' fees and
expenses, subject to the Company's agreement to reimburse the insurers for up to
approximately $577,000 of those settlement and defense costs if the Company
achieves certain positive financial results prior to the federal Court's final
approval of the settlement. Although the Company does not concede that any
portion of the class action settlement is allocable to the Company, the Company
has agreed to the terms of the settlement to avoid further costs. The Company's
portion of the settlement which totaled $232,000 has been included in the
results of operations for the fourth quarter ended December 27, 1997.

On December 8, 1996, Scott A. Blum and William F. Blum entered into a
standstill and voting agreement pursuant to which they agreed (1) to vote for
the Company's Board as constituted on December 8, 1996, or its nominees,
provided William F. Blum or his nominee was on the slate recommended by the
Board; (2) to preserve Company confidential information and avoid interference
with management; and (3) to refrain from seeking to form or joining a group for
the purpose of acquiring or selling a controlling interest in the Company. In
return the Company agreed to register certain shares held by the Blums for
resale if requested to do so. The standstill agreement expired in December
1997.

Results of Operations

THE COMPANY HAS BEEN UNABLE TO OBTAIN AN AUDIT OPINION ON THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1997, FROM ITS
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR PRINCIPALLY AS A RESULT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S
CONCERN OVER THE ABILITY OF THE COMPANY TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN.
CONSEQUENTLY, THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO, AND SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA. , HEREIN CONTAINED ARE PRESENTED AS UNAUDITED. THE READER OF
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, NOTES, SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA, AND MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SHOULD
CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE LACK OF AN INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ATTESTATION TO THE
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY FOR DECEMBER 27,
1997 PRESENTED IN THIS FORM 10-K. THIS REPORT ON FORM 10-K IS BEING FILED
CONCURRENTLY WITH THE COMPANY'S REPORTS ON FORM 10-Q FOR EACH OF THE QUARTERS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, JUNE 30, 1998 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1998. THIS REPORT ON FORM
10-K SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ABOVE-NOTED FILINGS, AS WELL AS ALL
REPORTS ON FORM 8-K FILED BY THE COMPANY SUBSEQUENT TO DECEMBER 27, 1997, FOR
INFORMATION CONCERNING CHANGES IN THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS, PRODUCTS, MANAGEMENT,
FINANCIAL CONDITION, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND OTHER EVENTS WHICH HAVE OCCURRED
SUBSEQUENT TO THE PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT.

The following table sets forth certain statement of operations data as a
percentage of net sales for the fiscal years indicated:

1997 1996 1995
----------- ------- ------
(UNAUDITED)

Net sales:
Optical storage devices.............. 100.0% 100.0% 99.3%
Components........................... - - 0.7
------ ------ -----
Total net sales.................... 100.0 100.0 100.0
------ ------ -----
Cost of sales:
Optical storage devices.............. 128.1 80.3 72.6
Components........................... - - 0.6
------ ------ -----
Total cost of sales................ 128.1 80.3 73.2
------ ------ -----
Gross profit (loss).................. (28.1) 19.7 26.8
------ ------ -----
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative.. 47.4 32.6 22.1
Research and development............. 9.6 10.0 6.1
Nonrecurring charges................. 6.7 7.9 2.6
------ ------ -----
Total operating expenses........... 63.7 50.5 30.8
------ ------ -----
Operating loss......................... (91.8) (30.8) (4.0)
Interest income........................ 0.1 0.1 0.2
Interest expense....................... (2.6) (0.9) -
Non-cash interest expense.............. (2.5) (2.9) -
------ ------ -----
Loss before income taxes............... (96.8) (34.5) (3.8)
Income tax expense (benefit)........... 0.2 (0.3) (0.8)
------ ------ -----
Net loss............................... (97.0)% (34.8)% (3.0)%
====== ====== =====

Comparison of 1997 to 1996

Net Sales. Net sales of optical storage devices decreased 48.1% to
$31,124,000 in 1997. The decrease was primarily attributable to the very
significant decrease in the unit sales and average sales prices of all of the
Company's products. The decreased unit sales can be attributed to increased
competition, the Company's inability to acquire products for sale because of the
Company's lack of financial resources and the discontinuance of certain of the
Company's products. Virtually all of the Company's vendors will only sell to the
Company on a prepay basis. The year 1997, and in particular the third and
fourth quarters of 1997, were severely and adversely affected by a general
uncertainty among customers created by the news of the Company's operational and
financial difficulties, and constraints on the Company's ability to purchase
product because of its financial condition. In addition, during the third
quarter of 1997, the Company reduced the selling prices of its Apex and Vertex
drives by an average of 33% in an attempt to reach a wider market and increase
sales of these drives. These price reductions were reversed in October 1997.
In addition, during 1997, the

Company experienced unusually high product returns that reduced net sales. These
product returns were the result of initial product quality problems with the
Company's Apex and Vertex drives, stock rotation returns by the distributor
channel and general returns probably increased in volume as a result of customer
uncertainty created by the news of the Company's operational and financial
difficulties.

Gross Profit (Loss). The Company incurred a gross loss of $8,736,000 in
1997 compared to a gross profit of $11,829,000 for 1996, which represented 19.7%
of net sales for that year. The gross loss for 1997 was primarily attributable
to the write-off of a portion of the Company's service inventories and the
establishment of substantial additional inventory excess and obsolescence
reserves. An aggregate of $6,893,000 in additions to inventory reserves were
made to recognize diminished values of component parts and service parts
inventories, consistent with the Company's revised estimates of future inventory
utilization as a result of the experiences and knowledge obtained during the
year 1997. The substantial quarter to quarter reductions in third and fourth
quarter net sales were a major contributor to the revised estimates of future
inventory values. As noted above, the Company experienced unusually high
product returns in 1997. A substantial portion of these returns was comprised
of used products and, accordingly, was recorded at zero inventory value. Also
as noted above, the Company has observed increased competition in the recordable
CD market for its current products and this competition placed additional
pressures on selling prices and gross margins during 1997, and is expected to
continue placing pressure on gross margins in future periods for existing
recordable CD products.

In addition, the significantly high costs associated with the Company's
Colorado Springs manufacturing facility and the excess manufacturing capacity
increased the costs of the Company's Apex and Vertex products significantly. In
1997 the Company relocated a substantial portion of its operations to Colorado
Springs and then returned them to California, all in the same year. The
combined costs of these relocations contributed significantly to the gross loss
for the year.

Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative
expenses decreased 24.5% to $14,772,000 and increased as a percentage of net
sales to 47.4% in 1997 from 32.6% in 1996. The decrease in absolute dollars in
selling, general and administrative expenses can be attributed to the Company's
need to decrease advertising and promotional expenditures and decrease sales and
administrative staffs during the latter half of 1997 in response to the
Company's reduced sales and its severe financial condition. The increase in the
percentage of net sales is attributable to the significant decline in net sales
that decreased at a faster rate than the decrease in selling, general and
administrative expenses.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses decreased 50.3%
to $2,984,000 in 1997, and decreased as a percentage of net sales to 9.6% in
1997 from 10.0% in 1996. The decreases in absolute dollars spent on research
and development resulted from decreased staffing at the Company's research and
development facility, along with decreased expenses for Apex and Vertex
prototypes and for ASIC development fees paid to third parties. During the
fourth quarter of 1997, the Company closed its research and development
capabilities in Colorado and all personnel associated with the research and
development activities of the Company have left the Company. Because of the
Company's financial condition it was unable to continue to fund its development
efforts for the Apex II product.

Nonrecurring Charges. Nonrecurring charges were $2,087,000 and $4,721,000
for the years 1997 and 1996, respectively. Nonrecurring charges for 1997 include
$857,000 representing the net book value of certain fixed assets, the ownership
of which was transferred to the Company's Colorado Springs facility lessor in
exchange for lease termination concessions. Nonrecurring charges for 1997 also
include $807,000, principally for the establishment of employee severance
accruals and $577,000 for accrued class action settlement and legal costs.
Nonrecurring charges for 1996 included $3,028,000 for costs associated with the
Company's then planned consolidation and transfer of manufacturing operations to
Colorado Springs, Colorado and the closing of its branch office in Japan. These
charges principally reflect the costs associated with early termination of
existing leases, losses from the disposal of assets and severance costs
resulting from work force reductions. Additional nonrecurring charges in 1996
included $1,602,000 primarily for changes to major component contracts with two
key suppliers. As of December 27, 1997, $568,000 of the 1996 restructuring
liability was considered to be no longer required principally as a result of
more favorable lease terminations than estimated. The $568,000 excess
restructuring liability was reversed and is reflected, net, as a reduction to
nonrecurring charges in the condensed statement of operations for the year ended
December 27, 1997. (See Notes 8 and 10 of Notes to Financial Statements).

Interest Income and Interest Expense. Interest income was $17,000 and
$84,000 and interest expense was $824,000 and $549,000 in 1997 and 1996,
respectively. The Company borrowed on its line of credit consistently during
1997 and frequently during 1996. Additionally, the Company issued convertible
debentures in amounts of $10,000,000 in July 1996

and $5,000,000 in December 1996, which accrued interest at 8% and 6%,
respectively. (See Notes 5 and 6 of Notes to Financial Statements).

Non-cash Interest Expense Related to Convertible Debentures. Non-cash
interest expense results from issuing debentures which are convertible at a
discount from market price of the common stock. The non-cash interest recorded
on the convertible debentures was amortized over the periods during which the
debentures first became convertible and have no effect on stockholders' equity.
During 1996 the Company recorded a non-cash interest charge of $1,721,000.
During 1997 the Company incurred an additional non-cash interest charge of
$786,000 to record the effect of the deferred interest expense in 1997. (See
Note 6 of Notes to Financial Statements).

Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $57,000 for 1997 and $184,000 for
1996. (See Note 9 of Notes to Financial Statements).

Comparison of 1996 to 1995

Net Sales. Net sales of optical storage devices decreased 26% to
$59,921,000 in 1996. The decrease was primarily attributable to the decline in
the average sales price of older RCD products as competition increased as
additional manufacturers entered the market. Additionally, while unit sales of
5.25" optical storage devices in 1996 were greater than in 1995, the average
sales prices of Apex and Vertex in 1996 was less than the average sales price of
its predecessor, Sierra, in 1995. As a result, sales for 5.25" optical storage
devices were approximately unchanged between 1996 and 1995.

Sales of components were $535,000 in 1995; there were no comparable sales
in 1996. The 1995 component sales were to a key supplier of the Company.

Gross Profit. Gross profit from optical storage devices decreased 46.1% to
$11,829,000 in 1996, and decreased as a percentage of optical storage device
revenue to 19.7% in 1996 from 26.8% in 1995. Increased competition in the RCD
market place and the continued delay in production of Apex and Vertex, which
replaced the end of life Sierra, each contributed to the decreased gross profit.
The Company's gross margin as a percent of net sales increased to 24.8% in the
fourth quarter of 1996 as the Company began to ship Apex.

Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased 8.0% to $19,565,000 in 1996 and increased as a percentage of
net sales to 32.6% in 1996 from 22.1% in 1995. During 1996, expenses were
reduced by $478,000, or 0.8% of net sales, due to gains in foreign currency
denominated transactions as the U.S. dollar appreciated against the Japanese
Yen. In contrast, expenses were increased by $473,000, or 0.6% of net sales
during 1995 due to losses on such transactions. The 1996 net increase was
primarily the result of the expansion of the sales and administrative staff.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses increased 20.7%
to $6,006,000 in 1996, and increased as a percentage of net sales to 10.0% in
1996 from 6.1% in 1995. The increases in research and development expenses were
primarily due to the expansion of the research and development staff, and
expenses associated with its research and development facility. The majority of
these increased costs related to the support of the Apex product development.

Nonrecurring charges. Nonrecurring charges were $4,721,000 and $2,132,000
in 1996 and 1995, respectively. Included in nonrecurring charges are costs
associated with the Company's restructuring, a contract modification in 1996 and
litigation settlement charges in 1995 and certain professional fees related to
the restatement of prior financial statements and related legal matters. The
1996 restructuring charge of $3,028,000 was for costs associated with the
Company's consolidation and transfer of manufacturing operations to Colorado
Springs, Colorado and the closing of its branch office in Japan. These
restructuring charges principally reflect the costs associated with early
termination of existing leases, losses from the disposal of assets and severance
costs resulting from work force reductions. Additional nonrecurring charges in
1996 included $1,602,000 primarily for changes to major component contracts with
two key suppliers. (See Notes 8 and 10 of Notes to Financial Statements).

Interest Income and Interest Expense. Interest income was $84,000 and
$187,000 and interest expense was $549,000 and $35,000 in 1996 and 1995,
respectively. While the Company only borrowed on its line of credit sporadically
during 1995, it was frequently in a borrowing position on its line of credit in
1996. Additionally, the Company issued convertible debentures in amounts of
$10,000,000 in July 1996 and $5,000,000 in December 1996, which accrued interest
at 8% and 6%, respectively. (See Notes 5 and 6 of Notes to Financial
Statements).

Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $184,000 and income tax benefit was
$663,000 for 1996 and 1995, respectively. (See Note 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and cash equivalents at December 27, 1997 decreased by $5,001,000 from
the December 28, 1996 balance. This decrease in available cash balances at
December 27, 1997 occurred virtually entirely due to losses incurred by the
Company in 1997. Operating activities used cash and cash equivalents of
$6,545,000, $14,889,000 and $713,000 in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
Inventories decreased by $11,310,000 in 1997. The 1997 decrease in inventories
was primarily attributable to the write-off of a portion of the Company's
service inventories and the establishment of substantial additional inventory
excess and obsolescence reserves. An aggregate of $6,893,000 in additions to
inventory reserves were made to recognize diminished values of component parts
and service parts inventories, consistent with the Company's revised estimates
of future inventory utilization as a result of the experiences and knowledge
obtained during the year.

The Company's significant losses in 1997 caused accrued expenses and other
liabilities to increase at year-end 1997 to $21,848,000. The $6,873,000 decrease
in accounts receivable from 1996 was caused by the significant decline in sales
in 1997 from 1996 levels, collection of amounts owed and additional reserves for
uncollectable accounts.

As of December 28, 1996, the Company had an income tax receivable of
$1,984,000, which was collected in 1997. This amount was refunded from the U.S.
Government as tax losses for 1996 and 1995 were carried back to prior years. A
valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. As a result of the
Company's significant losses in 1997 and 1996 and uncertainties surrounding the
realization of the net operating loss, management has determined that the
realization of the deferred tax assets is not more likely than not. Accordingly,
a 100% valuation allowance has been recorded. (See Note 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements).

The Company currently has a revolving line of credit agreement with a
lender which is collateralized by substantially all assets of the Company. The
Company has a maximum availability of $10,000,000 under the line of credit based
on a percentage of eligible accounts receivable and inventories. Interest is
payable monthly at the lender's reference rate (8.50% at December 27, 1997)
plus 1.75%. As of December 27, 1997 and June 18, 1998, the Company was not in
compliance with the terms of this line of credit. Although the Company has the
maximum availability of $10,000,000 under the line of credit based on a
percentage of eligible accounts receivable and inventories, its ability to
borrow against the revolving line of credit is largely dependent upon its level
of eligible accounts receivable. Because of its lower than expected level of
shipments, the Company's eligible accounts receivable are also lower than
expected and the Company frequently has exceeded the maximum available under the
line of credit. At December 27, 1997 and June 18, 1998, the Company had
borrowed in excess of its available credit under the line.

Borrowings under the line of credit totaled $6,166,000 at December 27, 1997
and $5,268,000 at June 18, 1998. (See Note 5 of Notes to Financial Statements).

The Company's financing activities provided cash and cash equivalents of
$2,837,000 and $17,548,000 in 1997 and 1996, respectively, and used $964,000 in
1995. The significant cash provided in 1996 resulted from the issuance of
$15,000,000 of convertible debentures and net borrowings of $3,276,000 on its
line of credit. Those significant borrowings were necessary to fund the
continuing net losses of the Company which were $20,833,000 in 1996 and
$2,459,000 in 1995. The net loss for 1997 of $30,229.000 was principally
funded by increases in unpaid obligations to unsecured creditors, increases in
indebtedness to the Company's secured lender, reductions in cash balances,
collection of income taxes receivable and reductions in accounts receivable and
inventories. (See Notes 5 and 6 of Notes to Financial Statements).

As a result of the Company's difficulty in paying its trade debt on a
timely basis because of its severe liquidity problems, the Company sought the
cooperation of its creditors in a restructuring of its trade debt in July, 1997.
The Company held a meeting with its trade creditors and a committee of the
creditors, representing in excess of 50% of the Company's trade debt, was
formed. The committee initially agreed to a 60-day moratorium on the payment of
the Company's outstanding trade debt. There were subsequent extensions of the
moratorium and the Company currently is operating under an informal moratorium
with no defined termination date. No assurance can be given that the moratorium
will be continued by the creditors' committee. In the event the Company is
unable to obtain additional extensions of the

moratorium, it will be unable to continue to operate as a going concern and will
seek protection under the Federal bankruptcy laws.

There is no forbearance agreement in place with the Company's secured
lender, although the Company's secured lender has continued to provide
borrowings to the Company. The Company has borrowed amounts from its secured
lender that exceed the amounts permitted as calculated using the Company's
eligible borrowing base under its line of credit. The Company is also in
default under other provisions of the agreement relating to its line of credit.
While the lender has cooperated so far with the Company's efforts to meet its
ongoing working capital requirements, there can be no assurance that such
cooperation will continue. In the event the Company is declared in default
under the line of credit by the lender and demand for payment is made, the
Company would be unable to make such payment, it will be unable to continue to
operate as a going concern and will seek protection under the Federal bankruptcy
laws.

1998 Trends

The Company's business changed so much in 1997 and 1996 that prior periods
provide a limited basis for useful comparison. The Company is in the early stage
of a turnaround. It has completely reversed its prior direction as an R&D and
manufacturing company based upon the Apex technology. The OEM reseller business
must provide complementary product lines and necessary revenue diversification.
The Company's liquidity has deteriorated due to the significant losses incurred
over the last two years and liquidity is essentially non-existent. Absent a
significant increase in revenue or the availability of other sources of funding,
the Company will seek protection under the Federal bankruptcy laws.

The Company intends to continue selling its Apex drive and the optical
libraries that use the Apex technology which provide the highest capacities
available at the date of this report. New competing products utilizing newer
technologies are, however, being introduced for sale in the second quarter of
1998 which will provide greater storage capacities. The Company intends to sell
those new products that the Company intends to acquire from OEMs. There can be
no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful in obtaining such
products.

The Company faces the following critical challenges in 1998:

Adequate Liquidity to Fund Operations. The Company incurred a net loss of
$938,000 for the first quarter of 1998 ended March 27, 1998. Although the loss
was lower than any quarterly loss recorded since the Company's last profitable
quarter, the third quarter of 1995, the Company must become profitable in the
future. The Company cannot continue to offset operating losses with asset
reductions. Furthermore, the Company is severely restricted as to the amount of
borrowings its secured lender will permit. There can be no assurance that the
Company will be able to operate profitably or that its secured lender will
continue to provide funds to operate the business. The inability to achieve
profitability or secure additional financing will result in the Company seeking
protection under the Federal bankruptcy laws.

Utilization of Inventories. The Company has significant investments in
component parts and sub-assemblies for its Apex product. To realize the value
of those inventories, the Company must continue to sell Apex drives during 1998
and into the early part of 1999. Although the Company believes the Apex product
will continue to be viable for that period, there can be no assurance that the
Company will be successful in utilizing those inventories.

Plan of Reorganization With Unsecured Creditors. The Company must reach an
agreement with its unsecured creditors that will provide the Company sufficient
time to repay the amounts owed to the creditors.

Inflation and Foreign Currency Exchange

Inflation has not had a significant impact on the Company's operating
results. The Company has from time-to-time attempted to reduce its anticipated
exposure to currency fluctuations by negotiating price and other cost
concessions from its suppliers, and by entering hedging transactions, including
the purchase of forward contracts for foreign currencies. Currently, the
Company's product and component purchases are denominated in U. S. Dollars, as
are its sales to international customers. Accordingly, the Company does not
expect to be impacted directly by currency fluctuations. There can be no
assurance, however, that the Company's results of operations will not be
adversely affected by currency fluctuations.

Risk Management

The Company has not used any derivative financial instrument. Company
policy restricts the concentration of credit risk in any one institution and
requires management approval of any hedging strategies and derivative financial
instrument transactions.

This Section and this entire Report on Form 10-K contain forward-looking
statements and include assumptions concerning the Company's operations,
future results and prospects. These forward-looking statements are based
on current expectations and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties
and other factors. In connection with the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995, the Company provides the cautionary statements included
in this Report identifying important factors which, among other things,
could cause the actual results and events to differ materially from those
set forth in or implied by the forward-looking statements and related
assumptions contained in this Section and in this entire Report.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
-------------------------------------------

The financial statements and supplementary data of the Company required by
this item are set forth at the pages indicated at Item 14(a)(1).

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Financial Disclosure
--------------------

BDO Seidman, LLP

As noted in the Company's Form 8-K dated January 6, 1998, the engagement of
BDO Seidman LLP, the former independent accountants of the Company, was
terminated by the resignation of BDO Seidman LLP.

Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

As noted in the Company's Form 8-K dated February 20, 1996, the engagement
of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., the former independent accountants of the Company,
was terminated by the resignation of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. on February 20,
1996.

Ernst & Young LLP

As noted in the Company's Form 8-K dated March 30, 1995, the engagement of
Ernst & Young LLP, the former independent accountants of the Company, was
terminated by the resignation of Ernst & Young LLP on March 30, 1995.

PART III
--------
Executive Officer Compensation

The following table sets forth compensation received for the fiscal years
ended December 27, 1997, December 28, 1996, and December 30, 1995 by the
Company's Chief Executive Officers and other executive officers whose salary and
bonus exceeded $100,000 for the fiscal year ended December 27, 1997
(collectively, the "Named Executive Officers"):

Summary Compensation Table

Long Term Compensation Awards
-----------------------------

Annual Compensation Securities All Other
Name and ------------------- Underlying Compensation
Principal Position Year Salary ($) Bonus Options/SARs (#) ($)/1/
- ------------------ -------- ---------- --------- ---------------- ------

Kenneth C. Campbell 1997 $ 275,670 -- 100,000 $1,782
President/2/ 1996 $ 157,740 -- 400,000 $ 343
1995 -- -- -- --
William F. Blum 1997 $ 141,538/3/ -- -- $ 468
President, Chief Executive 1996 $ 153,615 -- -- --
Officer, Chief Financial Officer/4/ 1995 $ 125,000 -- -- --
Roger Hay 1997 $ 170,697 -- 50,000 $ 406
Executive Vice President and 1996 $ 94,062 $20,000 300,000 $ 86
Chief Financial Officer/5/ 1995 -- -- -- --
James G. Hanley 1997 $ 122,717 $32,938 -- $ 110
Vice President of Sales/6/ 1996 $ 183,971 -- -- $ 177
1995 $ 156,453 -- 22,500 $ 117
Charles R. McGee 1997 $ 128,093 -- 5,000 $ 534
Vice President Human 1996 $ 86,563 $ 3,750 28,500 $ 375
Resources and Administration 1995 $ 69,140 -- 15,000 $ 188
Jamey L. Robbins 1997 $ 113.059 -- 18,000 $ 77
Vice President Research 1996 $ 105,803 $ 1,500 25,000 $ 85
and Development/7/ 1995 $ 100,445 -- -- $ 55
Bernard J. Wu 1997 $ 103,341 $10,000 25,000 $ 88
Vice President of Marketing/8/ 1996 -- -- 65,000 --
1995 -- -- -- --

- ---------------------------------------
/1/ Represents premiums paid on term life insurance policies.
/2/ Effective September 30, 1997, Mr. Kenneth C. Campbell resigned from his
position as President of the Company.
/3/ Includes $87,500 in payments Mr. William F. Blum received under the
provisions of his Executive Consulting Agreement prior to his return to the
Company as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer.
/4/ Effective August 21, 1997, Mr. William F. Blum was rehired as President,
Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
/5/ Effective August 28, 1997, Mr. Roger Hay resigned from his position as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
/6/ Effective August 25, 1997, Mr. James G. Hanley resigned from his position as
Vice President of Sales of the Company.
/7/ Effective October 24, 1997, Mr. Jamey L. Robbins resigned from his position
as Vice President of Research and Development of the Company.
/8/ Effective August 22, 1997, Mr. Bernard J. Wu resigned from his position as
Vice President of Marketing of the Company.

Employment Agreements and Severance Payments

In February 1997, the Company entered into a severance agreement and release
with Scott A. Blum, under which Mr. Blum will receive 36 months of base salary
and 450,000 nonstatutory vested options at an exercise price of $6.41 replacing
options Mr. Blum held which expired by virtue of his resignation in October
1996. Following the payment made in June 1997, payments were discontinue by the
Company due to its financial condition.

In February 1997, The Company agreed to pay Mr. Lawrence Goelman five months of
base salary (two months as severance) following Mr. Goelman's December 6, 1996
resignation as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

During March and June 1997, the Company entered into one year severance
agreements with the following Named Executive Officers, Charles R. McGee and
Jamey L. Robbins, which provided 12 months of base salary if their employment is
terminated by the Company for reasons other than cause or if there is a change
in control of the Company.

Stock Options

The following table sets forth certain information regarding options
granted to the Named Executive Officers during the fiscal year ended December
27, 1997:

Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year

(UNAUDITED)

Individual Grants
----------------------------------------- Potential Realizable
Number of % of Total Annual Rates of Stock
Securities Options Exercise Price Appreciation for
Underlying Granted to or Base Option Term/9/
Options Employees in Price Expiration ----------------------
Name Granted(#)/10/ Fiscal Year ($/Sh) Date 5%($) 10%($)
- -------------------- -------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- -------- --------

K. Campbell 100,000/11/ 10.4% $2.50 1/2/2007 $157,224 $398,436
R. Hay 50,000 5.2% $2.69 3/25/2007 $ 84,586 $214,358
B. Wu 25,000 2.6% $1.44 5/20/2007 $ 22,640 $ 57,375
J. Robbins 18,000 1.9% $2.56 3/27/2007 $ 28,979 $ 73,440
C. McGee 5,000 0.5% $2.69 3/25/2007 $ 8,459 $ 21,436

- ---------------------------
/9/ Amounts represent hypothetical gains that could be achieved for the
respective options if exercised at the end of the option term. These gains
are based on assumed rates of stock appreciation of 5% and 10% compounded
annually from the date the respective options were granted to their
expiration date. Actual gains, if any, on stock option exercises will
depend on the future performance of the Common Stock and the date on which
the options are exercised.

/10/ These options were granted "at Market" on the date of grant and first
become exercisable on the first anniversary of the grant date, with one-
third of the underlying shares becoming exercisable at that time, an
additional one-third of the options shares becoming exercisable on the
second anniversary date, and full vesting on the third anniversary date.
The options were granted for a term of ten years, subject to earlier
termination for certain events related to termination of employment.

/11/ As part of Mr. Campbell's promotion to President of the Company, these
options became exercisable at the grant date.

None of the Named Executive Officers exercised stock options during the
fiscal year ended December 27, 1997. The following table sets forth the number
and value of unexercised vested options held by each of the Name Executive
Officers on December 27, 1997:

Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year
and Fiscal Year-End Option Values

Number of Securities Value of
Underlying Unexercised Unexercised In-the-Money
Options at Fiscal Year End(#) Options at Fiscal Year End ($)/12/
----------------------------- ----------------------------------
Name Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
- ---- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------

K. Campbell/13/ 233,333 -- -- --
W. Blum -- -- -- --
R. Hay/14/ -- -- -- --
J. Hanley -- -- -- --
J. Robbins/15/ 51,240 34,667 -- --
C. McGee 19,500 29,000 -- --
B. Wu/16/ -- -- -- --

Compensation of Directors

During 1997, the Board of Directors approved a decrease in Board
Compensation for non-employee directors to reduce cost and better align Board
compensation with the Company's reduced revenue projections. Effective April 1,
1997, the annual fee for each non-employee director was reduced from $40,000 to
$12,000, (prorated if less than 75% of all Board and committee meetings are
attended); the $5,000 annual fee for all committee chairs was eliminated; the
initial option grant to each new director to purchase 25,000 shares of Common
Stock was reduced to 10,000 shares. The annual grant of options to each non-
employee director to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock was not changed.
The options are granted at fair market value at the time of grant and vest over
three years.

- -------------------------------
/12/ Based on the fair market value of the Common Stock on December 26, 1997
($0.125), less the option exercise price of "in-the-money" options.
/13/ 266,667 options expired prior to any vesting when Mr. Campbell resigned.
/14/ 350,000 options expired prior to any vesting when Mr. Hay resigned.
/15/ 34,667 options expired prior to any vesting when Mr. Robbins resigned.
/16/ 90,000 options expired prior to any vesting when Mr. Wu resigned.

PART IV
-------

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
----------------------------------------------------------------

(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this Report:

Financial Statements.

THE COMPANY HAS BEEN UNABLE TO OBTAIN AN AUDIT OPINION ON THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERTO FOR THE YEARE ENDED DECEMBER 27,
1997, FROM ITS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR PRINCIPALLY AS A RESUULT OF THE
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONCERN OVER THE ABILITY OF THE COMPANY TO
CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN. CONSEQUENTLY, THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND NOTES THERETO FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1997, AND SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1997. HEREIN CONTAINED
ARE PRESENTED AS UNAUDITED. THE READER OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS,
NOTES, SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA, AND MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SHOULD
CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE LACK OF AN INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ATTESTATION TO
THE FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY FOR
DECEMBER 27, 1997 PRESENTED IN THIS FORM 10-K. THIS REPORT ON FORM 10-
K IS BEING FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH THE COMPANY'S REPORTS ON FORM 10-Q
FOR EACH OF THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, JUNE 30, 1998 AND
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998. THIS REPORT ON FORM 10-K SHOULD BE READ IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE ABOVE-NOTED FILINGS, AS WELL AS ALL REPORTS ON
FORM 8-K FILED BY THE COMPANY SUBSEQUENT TO DECEMBER 27, 1997, FOR
INFORMATION CONCERNING CHANGES IN THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS, PRODUCTS,
MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL CONDITION, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND OTHER
EVENTS WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SUBSEQUENT TO THE PERIOD COVERED BY THIS
REPORT.

Financial Statements
---------------------

Page No.
--------

Comment on the unaudited 1997 Financial Statements 29
- 1996 and 1995 Financial Statements 30
Balance Sheets - December 27, 1997 and December 28, 1996 31
Statements of Operations - Years Ended December 27, 1997, December 28, 1996
and December 30, 1995 32
Statements of Stockholders' Equity - Years Ended December 27, 1997, December 28, 1996,
and December 30, 1995 33
Statements of Cash Flows - Years Ended December 27, 1997, December 28, 1996,
and December 30, 1995 34,35
Notes to Financial Statements 36

(2) Financial Statement Schedule. The following financial statement
schedule of Pinnacle Micro, Inc., is filed as part of this Report and
should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements of
Pinnacle Micro, Inc.:

Index to Financial Statement Schedule
-------------------------------------
Page No.
--------

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts 51

All other schedules are omitted because they are not required or the
required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits:

Exhibit No. Description Location
- ----------- ----------- --------

3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. (1)
3.2 Bylaws of the Company, as currently in effect. (1)
4.1 Specimen Certificate of Common Stock. (1)
10.1* Pinnacle Micro, Inc. Incentive Stock Option, Nonqualified Stock Option
and Restricted Stock Purchase Plan -- 1989 (the "1989 Plan"). (1)
10.2* Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement pertaining to the 1989 Plan. (1)
10.3* Pinnacle Micro, Inc. Incentive Stock Option, Nonqualified Stock Option
and Restricted Stock Purchase Plan -- 1993 (the "1993 Plan"). (1)
10.4* Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement pertaining to the 1993 Plan. (1)
10.5* Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement pertaining to the 1993 Plan. (1)
10.6* Form of Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement pertaining to the 1993 Plan. (1)
10.7 Pinnacle Micro, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (1)
10.8 Distributor Agreement, dated June 14, 1991, by and between the Company
and Merisel Inc., together with Amendment dated June 14, 1991
and Addendum dated February 11, 1993. (1)
10.9 Distributor Agreement, dated July 30, 1991, by and between the Company
and Tech Data Corporation, together with Addendum No. 1 to Distributor
Agreement dated July 30, 1991. (1)
10.10 Distributor Agreement, dated August 18, 1989, by and between the Company
and Ingram Micro D Inc., together with Addenda Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. (1)
10.11 Peripherals OEM Purchase Agreement, dated May 1, 1991, by and between the
Company and Hewlett-Packard Company, together with Amendment to Peripherals
OEM Agreement No. A509M, effective May 12, 1992. (1)
10.12 Computer Peripheral Products Company Peripheral Systems Products Agreement,
dated April 1, 1992, by and between the Company and Computer Peripheral
Products Company, Sony Corporation of America. (1)
10.13 Basic Agreement, dated April 1, 1992, by and between the Company and Sony
Corp. in Japan. (1)
10.14 Agreement, effective October 28, 1991, by and between the Company and
Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., together with Memorandum dated February 19,
1992, Addendum dated August 1, 1992, Memorandum dated September 9, 1992
and letter dated October 15, 1992. (1)
10.15+ OKI Semiconductor Standard Products Volume Purchase Agreement, dated
August 17, 1992, by and between the Company and OKI Semiconductor. (1)
10.16+ Nippon Pinnacle Micro, Pinnacle Micro and Ricoh Company Ltd. Purchase
Agreement, dated October 1, 1992, by and among the Company, Nippon
Pinnacle Micro and Ricoh Company Ltd. (1)
10.17 Agreement on Sale and Purchase, dated January 1, 1993, by and between
the Company and Victor Company of Japan, Limited, together with Addenda
Nos. I, II and III. (1)
10.19 Lease, dated January 6, 1993, by and between the Company and Webb/Colorado
Ventures, Ltd. (1)
10.20 Lease, dated February 5, 1991, by and between the Company and The Irvine
Company, together with Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. (1)

Exhibit No. Description Location
- ----------- ----------- ---------

10.21 Form of Indemnification Agreement for officers and directors of the Company. (1)
10.22* Form of Nonqualified Stock Agreement pertaining to the 1989 Plan. (1)
10.23 Business Loan Agreement, dated August 4, 1994, by and between the
Company and Bank of America, together with Amendment No. One,
dated October 4, 1994 and Amendment No. Two, dated February
2, 1995. (2)
10.24(a) Amendment No. Three, dated August 31, 1995, to Business Loan
Agreement, dated August 4, 1994, by and between the Company
and Bank of America. (3)
10.24(b) Amendment No. Four, dated October 10, 1995, to Business
Loan Agreement, dated August 4, 1994, by and between the
Company and Bank of America. (3)
10.24(c) Amendment No. Five, dated January 24, 1996, to Business Loan
Agreement, dated August 4, 1994, by and between the Company
and Bank of America. (3)
10.24(d) Amendment No. Six, dated March 28, 1996, to Business Loan
Agreement, dated August 4, 1994, by and between the Company
and Bank of America. (3)
10.25++ Development, Manufacturing and Purchasing Agreement dated
June 30, 1995, by and between the Company and Asahi Optical
Co., LTD. (3)
10.26* Employment Agreement dated December 15, 1995, by and
between the Company and James G. Hanley. (3)
10.27* First Amendment to the 1993 Equity Incentive Plan of Pinnacle
Micro, Inc. (the "1993 Plan"). (3)
10.28* First Amendment to the 1989 Equity Incentive Plan of Pinnacle
Micro, Inc. (the "1989 Plan"). (3)
10.29++ Development and Manufacturing Agreement dated October 6,
1994, by and between the Company and Advanced Hardware
Architectures, Inc. (3)
10.30++ Computer 2000 Purchase Agreement dated September 13, 1995,
by and between the Company and Computer 2000. (3)
10.31 Stipulation of settlement - Class action - Kurtz, et al. vs. Blum, et al.;
Case No. SAC-94-1043-GLT(EEx). (3)
10.32 Form of Offshore Subscription Agreement. (4)
10.33 Form of Convertible Debentures. (4)
10.34 Form of Registration Rights Agreement. (4)
10.35 Loan and Security Agreement with Coast Business Credit dated
September 18, 1996. (5)
10.36* 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan. (6)
10.37* 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan. (6)
10.38* Employment Agreement for Kenneth Campbell as of December 1, 1996. (6)
10.39 Employment Agreement for Roger Hay as of December 1, 1996. (6)
10.40* Employment Agreement for Jonathan B. Eddison as of December 1, 1996. (6)
10.41* Employment Agreement for Kevin Lehnert as of December 1, 1996. (6)
10.42* Employment Agreement for David Ooley as of December 1, 1996. (6)
10.43* Stand-still and Voting Rights Agreement dated December 8, 1996. (6)
10.44* Scott Blum - Severance Agreement and Release of February 13, 1997. (6)
10.45* Employment Agreement for Bernard Wu dated as of March 26, 1997 (7)
10.46* Employment Agreement for David Nesbit dated as of March 26, 1997 (7)
23.1 Comment on the Consent of Independent Auditor
23.2 Comment on the Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP.

- --------------------------------------
(1) Incorporated by reference to the referenced exhibit number to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1, Reg. No. 33-62614.

(2) Incorporated by reference to exhibit filed with the Company's Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994.
(3) Incorporated by reference to exhibit filed with the Company's Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 1995.
(4) Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company's Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 1996.
(5) Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company's Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 1996.
(6) Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company's Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 1996.
(7) Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company's Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 29, 1997.

- ----------------------------------------
* Denotes applicable executive compensation plans and arrangements of the
Company.
+ Confidential treatment has been granted by the Commission. The copy filed
as an exhibit omits the
information subject to the confidentiality grant.
++ Confidentiality treatment has been requested. The copy filed as an exhibit
omits the information subject
to the confidentiality request.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

January 6, 1998 Resignation of BDO Seidman, LLP as independent
February 4, 1998 auditors. Delisting of the Company's common stock
from trading on the NASDAQ National Market.

SIGNATURES
- ----------

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

May 12, 1999 By: \s\ WILLIAM F. BLUM
- ------------ -------------------
William F. Blum
Date Director, Chairman, President, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
and a Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

May 12,1999 By: \s\ WILLIAM F. BLUM
- ----------- -------------------
William F. Blum
Date Director, Chairman, President, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
and a Director

Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants

THE COMPANY HAS BEEN UNABLE TO OBTAIN AN AUDIT OPINION ON THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERTO FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1997, FROM ITS
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR PRINCIPALLY AS A RESULT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S
CONCERN OVER THE ABILITY OF THE COMPANY TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN.
CONSEQUENTLY, THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO AND SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1997 HEREIN CONTAINED ARE PRESENTED AS
UNAUDITED. THE READER OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, NOTES, SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA, AND MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE LACK OF AN INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE
COMPANY FOR DECEMBER 27, 1997 PRESENTED IN THIS FORM 10-K.

Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants

THE COMPANY HAS BEEN UNABLE TO OBTAIN THE NECESSARY CONSENT FROM THE COMPANY'S
PREDECCESOR INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, NOTES FOR THE
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1996 AND DECEMBER 30, 1995, PRINCIPALLY AS A RESULT OF
THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONCERN OVER THE ABILITY OF THE COMPANY TO CONTINUE AS
A GOING CONCERN. CONSEQUENTLY, THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO,
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA, AND MAMANEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, HEREIN CONTAINED, ALTHOUGH UNCHANGED FROM
THE PRIOR YEAR FORM 10-K, ARE PRESENTED AS UNAUDITED. THE READER OF THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, NOTES, SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA, AND MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SHOULD
CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE LACK OF A CONSENT FROM THE PREDECCESOR AUDITORS TO
REISSUE THEIR AUDIT OPINION ON THE FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OF THE COMPANY FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1996 AND DECEMBER 30, 1995
PRESENTED IN THIS FORM 10-K.

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

ASSETS

December 27, December 28,
1997 1996
------------- ----------------

Current assets:
................................................ (UNAUDITED) SEE EXHIBIT 23.2
Cash and cash equivalents............................ $ 454,000 $ 5,455,000
Accounts receivable, net of allowance
of $2,906,000 at December 27, 1997
and $748,000 at December 28, 1996................... 4,853,000 11,726,000
Income taxes receivable.............................. - 1,984,000
Inventories.......................................... 6,404,000 17,714,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets............ 375,000 215,000
----------- -----------
Total current assets.................................. 12,086,000 37,094,000
Furniture and equipment, net.......................... 447,000 7,739,000
Deferred interest related to convertible debentures... - 786,000
Other assets.......................................... 11,000 619,000
----------- -----------
Total assets.......................................... $12,544,000 $40,238,000
=========== ===========

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Current liabilities:

Note payable.......................................... $ 6,166,000 $ 3,276,000
Accounts payable...................................... 18,581,000 15,540,000
Accrued expenses...................................... 1,641,000 2,922,000
Accrued restructuring................................. 1,501,000 1,421,000
Payroll related liabilities........................... 125,000 1,225,000
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities.............................. 28,014,000 24,384,000
Convertible debentures................................. - 6,422,000

Accrued restructuring, net of current portion.......... - 929,000
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Preferred stock, $.001 par value:
Authorized shares - 5,000,000
Issued and outstanding - none........................ - -
Common stock, $.001 par value:
Authorized shares - 30,000,000
Issued and outstanding shares -
14,500,089 at December 27, 1997
and 9,935,594 at December 28, 1996.................. 15,000 10,000
Additional paid-in capital............................ 34,977,000 28,551,000
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)............... (50,462,000) (20,058,000)
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)................... (15,470,000) 8,503,000
------------ ------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)... $ 12,544,000 $ 40,238,000
============ ============

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years Ended
-------------------------------------------------
December 27, December 28, December 30,
1997 1996 1995
------------- ----------------- -------------

(UNAUDITED) SEE EXHIBIT 23.2
Net sales:
Optical storage devices..................... $ 31,124,000 $ 59,921,000 $81,309,000
Components.................................. - - 535,000
------------ ------------ -----------
Total net sales............................ 31,124,000 59,921,000 81,844,000
------------ ------------ -----------
Cost of sales:
Optical storage devices..................... 39,860,000 48,092,000 59,437,000
Components.................................. - - 455,000
------------ ------------ -----------
Total cost of sales........................ 39,860,000 48,092,000 59,892,000
------------ ------------ -----------
Gross profit................................. (8,736,000) 11,829,000 21,952,000
------------ ------------ -----------
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative......... 14,772,000 19,565,000 18,116,000
Research and development.................... 2,984,000 6,006,000 4,978,000
Nonrecurring charges........................ 2,087,000 4,721,000 2,132,000
------------ ------------ -----------
Total operating expenses................... 19,843,000 30,292,000 25,226,000
------------ ------------ -----------
Operating loss............................... (28,579,000) (18,463,000) (3,274,000)
Interest income.............................. 17,000 84,000 187,000
Interest expense............................. (824,000) (549,000) (35,000)
Non-cash interest expense related
to convertible debentures................... (786,000) (1,721,000) -
------------ ------------ -----------
Loss before income taxes..................... (30,172,000) (20,649,000) (3,122,000)
Income tax expense (benefit)................. 57,000 184,000 (663,000)
------------ ------------ -----------
Net loss..................................... $(30,229,000) $(20,833,000) $(2,459,000)
============ ============ ===========
Net loss per share.......................... $(2.32) $(2.52) $(0.31)
============ ============ ===========

Weighted average common shares outstanding... 13,039,000 8,272,000 7,842,000
============ ============ ===========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(unaudited as to the year ended December 27, 1997 and see exhibit 23.2 for the
year ended December 28, 1996)

Retained
Three Years Ended Dec. 27, 1997 Common Stock Additional Earnings Foreign
-------------------- Paid-in (Accumulated Currency
Shares Amount Capital Deficit) Translation Total
---------- ------- ----------- ------------- ------------ -------------

Balances at December 31, 1994................... 5,214,106 $ 5,000 $15,763,000 $ 3,143,000 $ - $ 18,911,000
Exercise of stock options...................... 16,037 - 191,000 - - 191,000
Tax benefit of employee stock options.......... - - 70,000 - - 70,000
Purchases through the employee
stock purchase plan........................... 14,938 - 134,000 - - 134,000
Shares issued in connection with
50% stock dividend............................ 2,622,518 3,000 - (3,000) - -
Repayment of dividends by
S Corporation stockholders.................... - - - 80,000 - 80,000
Deferred compensation.......................... - - - 14,000 - 14,000
Foreign currency translation................... - - - - (200,000) (200,000)

Net loss for the year ended
December 30, 1995............................. - - - (2,459,000) - (2,459,000)
---------- ------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------
Balances at December 30, 1995................... 7,867,599 8,000 16,158,000 775,000 (200,000) 16,741,000
Exercise of stock options...................... 15,010 - 63,000 - - 63,000
Tax benefit of employee stock options.......... - - 11,000 - - 11,000
Purchases through the employee
stock purchase plan........................... 19,737 - 98,000 - - 98,000
Shares issued for settlement of
stockholder lawsuit........................... 190,084 - 1,400,000 - - 1,400,000
Shares issued upon conversion of
convertible debentures........................ 1,801,381 2,000 8,083,000 - - 8,085,000
Shares issued for interest on
convertible debentures........................ 41,783 - 191,000 - - 191,000
Additional paid-in capital related to
debenture embedded interest................... - - 2,507,000 - - 2,507,000
Foreign currency translation................... - - - - 200,000 200,000
Warrants issued in connection with
convertible debentures........................ - - 31,000 - - 31,000
Non-employee stock option
compensation.................................. - - 9,000 - - 9,000
Net loss for the year ended
December 28, 1996............................. - - - (20,833,000) - (20,833,000)

---------- ------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------
Balances at December 28, 1996................... 9,935,594 10,000 28,551,000 (20,058,000) - 8,503,000
Dividend for S Corporation tax refund.......... - - - (175,000) - (175,000)
Exercise of stock options...................... 1,500 - 1,000 - - 1,000
Tax benefit of employee stock options.......... - - 4,000 - - 4,000
Non-employee stock option compensation - - 72,000 - - 72,000
Purchases through the employee
stock purchase plan........................... 83,906 - 118,000 - - 118,000
Shares issued upon conversion of
convertible debentures........................ 4,367,979 5,000 6,063,000 - - 6,068,000
Shares issued for interest on
convertible debentures........................ 108,110 - 153,000 - - 153,000
Shares issued for settlement of vendor
dispute...................................... 3,000 - 15,000 - - 15,000
Net loss for the year ended
December 27, 1997............................. - - - (30,229,000) - (30,229,000)
---------- ------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------
Balances at December 27, 1997................... 14,500,089 $15,000 $34,977,000 $(50,462,000) $ - $(15,470,000)
========== ======= =========== ============ =========== ============

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended
--------------------------------------------
December 27, December 28, December 30,
1997 1996 1995
------------ ------------- ------------
(UNAUDITED) SEE EXHIBIT 23.2

Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income (loss)...................................... $(30,229,000) $(20,833,000) $(2,459,000)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization........................ 1,148,000 1,323,000 896,000
Provision for doubtful accounts...................... 122,000 369,000 230,000
Provision for product returns and price protection... 7,492,000 999,000 128,000
Provision for inventory obsolescence................. 9,274,000 866,000 871,000
Provision for litigation settlement.................. - - 1,400,000
Settlement of vendor dispute paid in common stock.... 15,000 - -
Non-cash interest expense............................ 786.000 1,721,000 -
Interest on debentures paid in common stock.......... 153,000 191,000 -
Compensation related to stock options and warrants... 72,000 40,000 -
Deferred compensation recognized..................... - - 14,000
Deferred income taxes................................ - 1,271,000 (128,000)
Loss on disposal of assets........................... 741,000 - -
Furniture and equipment reserve...................... 696,000 - 16,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable................................. (740,000) (1,740,000) (1,361,000)
Income taxes receivable............................. 1,984,000 (985,000) (999,000)
Inventories......................................... 2,035,000 (7,167,000) (4,260,000)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets........... (160,000) 746,000 (423,000)
Other assets........................................ 254,000 31,000 25,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses............... 1,840,000 7,081,000 4,994,000
Payroll related liabilities......................... (1,100,000) 269,000 343,000
Other liabilities................................... (928,000) 929,000 -
------------ ------------ -----------
Net cash used in operating activities.................. (6,545,000) (14,889,000) (713,000)
------------ ------------ -----------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Sale of short-term investments......................... - - 2,436,000
Purchase of furniture and equipment.................... (1,320,000) (904,000) (1,841,000)
Proceeds from the sales of furniture and equipment..... 27,000 - s -
------------ ------------ -----------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities.... (1,293,000) (904,000) 595,000
------------ ------------ -----------
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from note payable............................. 2,890,000 8,276,000 -
Principal payments on note payable to bank............. - (5,000,000) (1,400,000)
Proceeds from issuance of debentures................... - 15,000,000 -
Payment of debt issuance costs......................... - (900,000) -
Principal payments on long-term debt and
capital lease obligations............................. - - (39,000)
Dividends.............................................. (175,000)
Dividends (paid to stockholders) repaid to Company..... - - 80,000
Proceeds from exercise of stock options................ 1,000 63,000 191,000
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options............. 3,000 11,000 70,000
Proceeds from issuance of stock through the
employee stock purchase plan.......................... 118,000 98,000 134,000
------------ ------------ -----------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities.... 2,837,000 17,548,000 (964,000)
------------ ------------ -----------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash................ - 94,000 (178,000)
------------ ------------ -----------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents....... (5,001,000) 1,849,000 (1,260,000)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year......... 5,455,000 3,606,000 4,866,000
------------ ------------ -----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year............... $ 454,000 $ 5,455,000 $ 3,606,000
============ ============ ===========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)

Years Ended
-----------------------------------------------
December 27, December 28, December 30,
1997 1996 1995
------------- ---------------- ------------
(UNAUDITED) SEE EXHIBIT 23.2

Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest................................. $ 642,000 $ 306,000 $ 45,000
============ ========== ============
Income taxes............................. $ 1,000 $ 15,000 $670,000
============ ========== ============
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash
Investing and Financing Activities:
Common stock issued upon conversion of
debentures, net......................... $6,068,000 $8,085,000 $ -
============ ========== ============
Common stock issued for settlement
of stockholder lawsuit.................. $ - $1,400,000 $ -
============ ========== ============
Additional paid-in capital related to
debenture embedded interest............. $ - $2,507,000 $ -
============ ========== ============

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 27, 1997
(UNAUDITED)

THE COMPANY HAS BEEN UNABLE TO OBTAIN AN AUDIT OPINION ON THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERTO FROM ITS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR PRINCIPALLY AS A
RESULT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONCERN OVER THE ABILITY OF THE COMPANY TO
CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN. CONSEQUENTLY, THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
THERETO, SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA, AND MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, HEREIN CONTAINED ARE PRESENTED AS
UNAUDITED. THE READER OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, NOTES, SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA, AND MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE LACK OF AN INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS ATTESTATION TO THE FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE
COMPANY FOR DECEMBER 27, 1997 PRESENTED IN THIS FORM 10-K.

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

Pinnacle Micro, Inc., (the "Company") acquires, manufactures and markets optical
storage systems for data intensive applications for use both with stand-alone
and networked personal computers and workstations. The financial statements
include the accounts of Pinnacle Micro, Inc., and its foreign branches, Nippon
Pinnacle Micro and Euro Pinnacle Micro. Euro Pinnacle Micro was closed during
1997 and Nippon Pinnacle Micro was closed during 1996 (see Note 8).

This summary of the Company's significant accounting policies is presented to
assist in understanding the Company's financial statements. The financial
statements and notes are representations of the Company's management, who are
responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies
conform to generally accepted accounting principles. Management uses estimates
and assumptions in preparing financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. Those estimates and assumptions affect the
amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results could vary for the
estimates that were used.

Fiscal Years

The Company operates and reports financial results on a fiscal year of 52 or 53
weeks ending on the Saturday closest to December 31. Accordingly, fiscal 1997
ended on December 27, 1997, fiscal 1996 ended on December 28, 1996 and fiscal
1995 ended on December 30, 1995. Prior to 1995 all fiscal years ended on
December 31.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes product sales revenue at the time of shipment and records
a reserve for estimated sales returns and price adjustments. The Company has
agreements with its resellers which, under certain circumstances, provide for
stock rotation for slow-moving items and price protection for inventories held
by the resellers at the time of published price reductions. It is reasonably
possible that the Company's estimates of sales returns and price adjustments may
change.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers all highly
liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when
purchased to be cash equivalents. The amount of cash equivalents reported in
the financial statements approximates fair value. The Company invests its cash
and cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions. At times
such investments may be in excess of the FDIC insurance limit.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts) are recorded at net
realizable value. The amount of accounts receivable reported in the financial
statements approximates fair value. Company management has estimated the
allowance

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

for doubtful accounts. It is reasonably possible that the Company's estimate of
the collectibility of accounts receivable will change.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or
market (net realizable value). It is reasonably possible that the Company's
estimate of market will change.

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Furniture and Equipment

Furniture and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation is determined using the straight-line method for all
assets based on the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from one
to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line
method over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the term of the
related leases.

The Company's policy is to evaluate the remaining life and recoverability of
furniture and equipment in light of current conditions. It is reasonably
possible that the Company's estimate to recover the carrying amount of property,
plant and equipment will change.

Debt Issuance Costs

The costs related to the issuance of the convertible debentures are capitalized
and amortized over the terms of the related debt.

Notes Payable

The amount of the notes payable reported in the financial statements
approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.

Advertising

The Company expenses advertising costs when incurred. Advertising expense
totaled $2,622,000, $5,916,000 and $6,472,000 for the years ended December 27,
1997, December 28, 1996, and December 30, 1995, respectively.

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are recorded for the temporary differences between the
Company's financial statements and tax returns in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (FAS 109), Accounting for Income Taxes.
FAS 109 is an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of
deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of
events that have been recognized in the Company's financial statements or tax
returns. In estimating future tax consequences, FAS 109 generally considers all
expected future events other than enactments of changes in the law or rates.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company applies APB Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,"
and related interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation
plans. Accordingly, no compensation cost is recognized for its employee stock
option plans, unless the exercise price of options granted is less than fair
market value on the date of grant. The Company has adopted the disclosure
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation" (see Note 7).

Foreign Currency Transactions

On January 1, 1995, the Company changed the functional currency of its branch
located in Japan (Nippon Pinnacle Micro) to the local functional currency and,
accordingly, the foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities were
translated to U.S. dollars at the year-end exchange rate. The effects of
translation are recorded as a separate component of stockholders' equity through
the date that Nippon Pinnacle Micro was closed during 1996 (see Note 8).
Exchange gains and losses arising from

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Foreign Currency Transactions (continued)

transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated at average
exchange rates. The effects of translation are recorded as a separate component
of stockholders' equity through the date that Nippon Pinnacle Micro was closed
during 1996 (see Note 8). Exchange gains and losses arising from transactions
denominated in foreign currencies are translated at average exchange rates. Net
foreign currency transaction gains of $478,000 and losses of $473,000 were
realized in 1996 and 1995, respectively, and are included in selling, general
and administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of operations. There
were no foreign currency transaction gains or losses in 1997.

Substantially all of the transactions of the Company's branch in the Netherlands
(Euro Pinnacle Micro) are denominated in U.S. dollars and accordingly no
remeasurement of foreign currency is necessary as the accounts are maintained in
U.S. dollars. Euro Pinnacle Micro was closed in 1997.

Foreign currency forward contracts are entered into from time to time to offset
the effects of exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in foreign
currencies. These contracts generally have maturity dates that do not exceed
three months. Gains and losses on contracts which effectively hedge foreign
currency transactions are deferred and included in income as part of those
transactions. The aggregate contract value of instruments used to buy U. S.
dollars in exchange for Japanese Yen was approximately $3,204,000 at December
30, 1995. There were no such contracts entered into at December 27, 1997 or
December 28, 1996. The carrying value of the foreign currency contracts
approximated their fair market value. The counter parties to these transactions
were major international financial institutions.

Software Development Costs

Research and development costs resulting from the design, development and
testing of new software for use in products are expensed as incurred until
technological feasibility has been established. Certain costs incurred
thereafter, such as coding and testing, are capitalized until the product is
available for general release to customers. Such amounts were not material for
the years presented.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
payable and accrued expenses are reasonable estimates of their fair value
because of the short maturity of those items. The Company believes the carrying
amounts of the Company's notes payable and convertible debentures approximate
fair value because the interest rates on these instruments are subject to change
with, or approximate, market interest rates.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share

In February 1997, The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 ("FAS-128"), Earnings Per
Share. FAS-128 replaces the presentation of primary and fully diluted earnings
per share with the presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Unlike
primary earnings per share, basic earnings per share excludes any dilutive
effects of options, warrants and convertible securities. Basic income (loss)
per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by
the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted income
(loss) per share is computed giving effect to all potentially dilutive common
shares. Potentially dilutive common shares may consist of incremental shares
issuable upon the exercise of stock options or in connection with convertible
securities. In periods in which a net loss has been incurred, all potentially
dilutive common shares are considered antidilutive and therefore excluded from
the calculation. The weighted average number of shares outstanding is adjusted
to include the number of additional common shares that would have been
outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued. All income
(loss) per share amounts for all prior periods have been restated to conform to
the requirements of FAS-128.

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Net Income (Loss) Per Share (continued)

The weighted average common shares outstanding used in the computation of income
(loss) per share have been retroactively restated to reflect the 1995 stock
dividend (see Note 7).

Estimated Accrual for Warranty Claims

The Company sells the majority of its products to customers along with
unconditional repair or replacement warranties. The accompanying financial
statements for the years ended December 27, 1997, December 28, 1996 and December
30, 1995 include provisions of $225,000, $100,000, and $110,000 for estimated
warranty claims based on the Company's experience relative to the amount of
claims actually made. It is reasonably possible that the Company's estimate of
the accrued warranty claims will change.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 1995 financial statements to be
consistent with the 1996 and 1997 presentation.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 1997, the FASB issued FAS-130, Reporting Comprehensive Income. FAS-130
establishes reporting and display requirements with respect to comprehensive
income and its components. This Statement requires that all items that are
required to be recognized under accounting standards as components of
comprehensive income be reported in a financial statement that is displayed with
the same prominence as other financial statements. This statement requires that
an enterprise (a) classify items of other comprehensive income by their nature
in a financial statement and (b) display the accumulated balance of other
compressive income separately from retained earnings and additional paid-in
capital in the equity section of the balance sheet. This Statement is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997 and requires reclassification
of financial statements for prior periods for comparative purposes. The Company
does not expect adoption of FAS-130 to have a material effect, if any, on its
financial condition or results of operations.

In February 1997 FAS-129, Disclosure of Information about Capital Structure, was
issued by the FASB and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 1997. The new standard reinstates various securities disclosure
requirements previously in effect under Account Principles Board ("APB") 15,
which has been superseded by FAS-128. The Company does not expect adoption of
FAS-129 to have a material effect, if any, on its financial condition or results
of operations.

In June 1997, the FASB issued FAS-131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. FAS-131 establishes standards for the way
that public business enterprises report information about operating segments in
annual financial statements, and requires that those enterprises report selected
information about operating segments in interim financial reports issued to
shareholders. It also establishes standards for related disclosures about
products and services, geographic areas and major customers. FAS-131 was
effective for fiscal years which began after December 15, 1997. The adoption of
FAS-131 had no impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position
or cash flows.

During October 1997, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee ("AcSEC") of
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued State of Position
("SOP") 07-2, Software Revenue Recognition. The SOP is effective for
transactions entered into in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997.
Different informal and unauthoritative interpretations of certain provisions of
SOP 97-2 have arisen. AcSEC is already deliberating amendments to SOP 97-2,
including deferral of the effective date of certain provisions of the SOP so
AcSEC can develop and issue an interpretation regarding the applicability and
the method of application of those provisions. Because of the uncertainties
related to the outcome of these amendments, the impact on the future financial
results of the Company is not currently determinable.

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

2. Going Concern Issues

The Company faces severe operating and financial difficulties. For the year
ended December 27, 1997, the Company incurred a net loss of $30,229,000. As of
December 27, 1997, The Company had a working capital deficiency of $15,928,000,
and a stockholders' deficit of $15,470,000. Realization of the carrying values
of the assets included in the balance sheet as of December 27, 1997, is
dependent upon the Company's successful future operations.

As a result of continuing significant losses, the Company has experienced
difficulty in paying its trade debt on a timely basis. The Company sought the
cooperation of its creditors in a restructuring of its trade debt in July 1997.
A committee of the creditors, representing in excess of 50% of the Company's
trade debt, was formed. The committee has agreed to several moratoriums on the
payment of the Company's outstanding unsecured debt. The Company is currently
operating under an informal moratorium with no defined termination date. No
assurance can be given that the creditors' committee will continue the
moratorium. In the event the Company is unable to obtain additional extensions
of the moratorium it may be unable to continue to operate as a going concern and
will seek protection under the Federal Bankruptcy laws.

There is no forbearance agreement in place with the Company's secured lender and
none is currently expected to be executed, although the Company's secured lender
has continued to provide borrowings to the Company. The Company has been
actively soliciting the involvement of alternative lenders. There can be no
assurance, however, that the Company will be successful in finding a replacement
lender or that its current lender will continue to provide funding for the
Company's operating needs. The Company has borrowed amounts from its secured
lender that exceed the amounts permitted as calculated using the Company's
eligible borrowing base under its line of credit. While the lender has
cooperated thus far with the Company's efforts to meet its ongoing working
capital requirements, there can be no assurance that such cooperation will
continue. In the event the Company is declared in default under the line of
credit by the lender and demand for payment is made, the Company would be unable
to make such payment, will be unable to continue to operate as a going concern
and will seek protection under the Federal Bankruptcy laws.

The Company expects to incur a net loss for the first quarter of 1998 which
ended March 27, 1998. Although the loss is expected to be lower than any
quarterly loss recorded since the Company's last profitable quarter, the third
quarter of 1995, the Company must become profitable. The Company cannot continue
to offset operating losses with asset reductions. Furthermore, the Company is
severely restricted as to the amount of borrowings its secured lender will
permit. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to operate
profitably or that its secured lender will continue to provide funds to operate
the business which will result in the Company seeking protection under the
Federal bankruptcy laws.

Virtually all of the Company's vendors will only sell to the Company on a prepay
basis.

Because of the significant facts and uncertainties described in the preceding
paragraphs, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue
as a going concern. Accordingly, the accompanying financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

3. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

1997 1996
------------------------
(UNAUDITED) SEE
EXHIBIT
23.

Components and work-in-process $12,210,000 $15,086,000
Finished goods 2,182,000 3,723,000
Reserve for excess inventory and obsolescence (7,988,000) (1,095,000)
------------------------
$ 6,404,000 $17,714,000
========================

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

3. Inventories (continued)

Management has determined the reserve for excess inventory and obsolescence by
reviewing expected product life cycles, assessing current inventory levels and
analyzing projected sales levels. Inventory in excess of expected sales
requirements and inventory expected to become obsolete has been fully reserved.

4. Furniture and Equipment

Furniture and equipment consists of the following:

1997 1996
-------------------------------
(UNAUDITED) SEE EXHIBIT 23.

Furniture and equipment $ 2,662,000 $ 2,587,000
Computers 1,661,000 1,601,000
Tooling - 757,000
Leasehold improvements - 270,000
----------------------------
4,323,000 5,215,000
Accumulated depreciation and
amortization (3,179,000) (3,476,000)
Reserve for furniture and
equipment disposition (697,000) (3,476,000)
----------------------------
$ 447,000 $ 1,739,000
============================

The reserve for furniture and fixture disposition has been estimated by
management based upon the Company's current utilization of computers and
furniture and equipment. All computers or furniture and equipment which are not
being utilized have been reserved for any amounts in excess of their market
value. Assets which cannot be located have been fully reserved.

5. Note Payable

The Company has a $10,000,000 revolving line of credit agreement with a lending
institution which is collateralized by substantially all assets of the Company
and which expires on September 30, 1998. Outstanding borrowings on this line of
credit were $6,166,000 and $3,276,000 at December 27, 1997 December 28, 1996,
respectively. The total unused amount available at December 27, 1997 was zero
and at December 28, 1996 was $6,030,000. Borrowings on this line credit are
based on a percentage of eligible accounts receivable and inventories. As of
December 27, 1997, the Company was not in compliance with the terms of the line
of credit and had borrowed in excess of its available credit under the
eligibility formulas. If it is in compliance with the terms of the line of
credit, the Company can obtain up to $3,500,000 in letters of credit pursuant to
this agreement; there were no such obligations under standby letters of credit
at December 27, 1997 or December 28, 1996. Interest is payable monthly at the
institution's reference rate (8.50% at December 27, 1997 and 8.25% at December
28, 1996) plus 1.75%. At December 27, 1997, the Company was not in compliance
with the principal terms of the line of credit agreement. At December 28, 1996,
the Company was in compliance with all terms of the line of credit agreement.
The current line of credit replaced a prior $5,000,000 line of credit with a
different lending institution which had no amounts outstanding at December 30,
1995.

The maximum amount outstanding under the Company's lines of credit at the end of
any month was $7,762,000 in 1997 and $5,000,000 in 1996. Average monthly
borrowings were $5,630,000 at a weighted average interest rate of 11.03% for
1997 and $2,239,000 at a weighted average interest rate of 9.57% for 1996.

6. Convertible Debentures

In July 1996, the Company completed its first offshore placement of $10,000,000
principal amount of convertible subordinated 8% debentures due July 2001. The
$10,000,000 placement yielded aggregate net proceeds of $9,400,000 after
commissions and fees to First Bermuda Securities Limited ("First Bermuda").
First Bermuda also received additional compensation in the form of 73,846
warrants exercisable for five years at a price of $8.125 which was 125% of the
closing bid price on the closing date. First Bermuda received customary
piggyback registration rights beginning 90 days from the

closing date and demand rights after two years. The debenture holders may
convert the principal of the 8% debentures in thirds, at discounts from the then
market price of 15%, 17.5% and 20%, in intervals commencing 60, 90 and 120 days
after the closing, respectively.

In December 1996, the Company completed a second offshore placement of
$5,000,000 principal amount of convertible subordinated 6% debentures due
December 2001. The $5,000,000 placement yielded aggregate net proceeds of
$4,700,000 after commission and fees to First Bermuda. First Bermuda also
received additional compensation in the form of 65,076 warrants exercisable for
five years at a price of $4.61 which was 125% of the closing bid price on the
closing date. First Bermuda received customary piggyback registration rights
beginning 90 days from the closing date and demand rights after two years. The
debenture holders received an aggregate of 32,538 of warrants with terms similar
to those of First Bermuda, except that such warrants are exercisable for one
year. The debenture holders may convert the principal of the 6% debentures as
follows: 30%, 40% and 30%, at discounts from the then market price of 15%,
17.5% and 20%, in intervals commencing 50, 80 and 110 days after closing,
respectively.

According to the views of certain members of the Staff of the SEC, convertible
debt instruments which are convertible at a discount to market should be
accounted for by treating such discount as additional interest expense. The
Company has computed the amount of the discount based on the difference between
the conversion price and fair value of the underlying common stock on the date
the debentures were issued. The Company conformed to those views and recorded
$2,507,000 as additional paid-in capital for the discount related to the
embedded interest in the convertible debentures. Of this amount, $786,000 and
$1,721,000, in 1997 and 1996, respectively, has been amortized and is included
in the caption "Non-cash interest expense related to convertible debentures" in
the accompanying statements of operations (see Note 13).

As of December 28, 1996, debentures aggregating $8,578,000 had been converted
into 1,801,381 shares of common stock at conversion prices ranging from $3.15 to
$6.44 per share. Stockholders' equity was increased by the full amount of the
debentures converted less the unamortized debt issuance costs. In addition,
41,783 shares of common stock were issued for $191,000 of interest payable on
the converted debentures.

As of December 27, 1997, debentures from both the December placement and the
prior placement made in July 1996, aggregating $6,422,000 were converted into
4,367,979 shares of common stock at conversion prices ranging from $4.16 to
$0.53 per share. Stockholders' equity was increased by the full amount of the
debentures converted less the unamortized debt issuance costs. In addition,
108,110 shares of common stock were issued for $153,000 of interest payable on
the converted debentures. All of the debentures were converted during 1997.

7. Stockholders' Equity

Dividends to Stockholders

Subsequent to the conversion from an S Corporation to a C Corporation, the
Company paid dividends for the previously taxed undistributed S Corporation
earnings as of June 30, 1993. As of December 31, 1994, these stockholders were
estimated to have been overpaid by $130,000, which was included as a receivable
in the 1994 balance sheet. This $130,000 overpayment plus an additional
$80,000, which was also determined to be an overpayment, were repaid to the
Company during 1995.

During 1997, upon finalization of an IRS audit of both the S Corporation and the
C Corporation, it was determined that the overpayment referred to above was not
as great as previously estimated. Accordingly, $151,000, plus interest, of the
associated refund received by the Company was distributed to the S Corporation
stockholders as an adjustment to the previously recorded S Corporation
dividends.

The Company anticipates any future earnings will be retained for use in the
business. The Company paid a 50% stock dividend on December 15, 1995, to
stockholders of record as of December 1, 1995. A total of 2,622,518 shares and
less than $1,000 of cash for fractional shares were distributed as part of this
stock dividend. All references in the financial statements to share amounts,
per share amounts and stock plan data have been restated to reflect this stock
dividend. The Company does not anticipate paying cash dividends on the common
stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, the Company's line of credit
agreement restricts the Company's ability to pay cash dividends on its capital
stock.

Stock Options and Stock Purchase Plans

Under terms of the Company's stock option plans (the "Plans"), 3,605,000 shares
of the Company's common stock are reserved for the granting of incentive stock
options and nonqualified stock options, and the sale of restricted common stock
to

the Company's key employees and non-employee directors. Options may not be
granted at a price that is less than fair market value on the date of grant, as
determined by the Company's Board of Directors, while restricted common stock
may be sold at any price. Options generally vest over 36 months and must be
exercised within 10 years from the date of grant. During 1996, the Company
adopted the 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan under which eligible
directors will automatically receive initial option grants to purchase 25,000
shares upon joining the Company's board of directors and additional option
grants to purchase 10,000 shares after each subsequent annual meeting of the
Company's stockholders. For financial reporting purposes, compensation expense,
representing the excess of the deemed value for accounting purposes of the stock
issuable upon exercise of the options over the aggregate exercise price of such
options, amounting to $50,000, was deferred in 1992 and was amortized over the
vesting periods of the respective option grants. This compensation expense was
fully amortized at December 30, 1995. During 1997 and 1996, the Company
recognized $72,000 and $9,000, respectively, of compensation expense related to
the issuance of stock options to non-employees. There was no such expense for
the year 1995.

The following is a summary of the activity under the Company's stock option
plans:

Number of Shares Option Price
Under Option per Share
---------------- -------------

Options outstanding at December 31, 1994 288,816 $.33 - 12.00
Granted 737,700 6.41 - 15.17
Exercised (24,055) .87 - 8.83
Canceled (95,007) 6.41 - 11.17
---------------- -------------
Options outstanding at December 30, 1995 907,454 .33 - 15.17
Granted 1,841,175 3.69 - 15.00
Exercised (15,010) .33 - 6.59
Canceled (1,080,886) .33 - 15.17
---------------- -------------
Options outstanding at December 28, 1996 1,652,733 .33 - 15.17
Granted 958,450 .75 - 4.81
Exercised (1,500) .88
Canceled (1,891,326) .88 15.17
---------------- -------------
Options outstanding at December 27, 1997 718,357 $.33 - 14.25
================ =============

The weighted average option price per share was $4.77, $6.40 and $7.15 for
options outstanding at December 27, 1997, December 28, 1996 and December 30,
1995, respectively.

Information relating to stock options at December 27, 1997 summarized by
exercise price is as follows:

Range of Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
-------- ---------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
Exercise Prices Weighted Average Weighted Average
--------------- -------------------------------- ----------------
Per Share Shares Life (Year) Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price
--------- ------- ----------- -------------- ------- --------------

$ 0.33 to $ 5.50 325,691 8.54 $ 2.63 167,524 $ 2.64
$ 6.00 to $ 6.00 260,166 8.73 6.00 234,499 6.00
$ 6.25 to $ 6.25 25,000 8.77 6.25 8,333 6.25
$ 6.41 to $ 6.41 9,000 7.02 6.41 6,000 6.41
$ 6.59 to $ 8.83 91,500 7.17 7.76 85,000 7.85
$ 11.00 to $ 11.00 4,250 7.61 11.00 4,000 11.00
$ 14.25 to $ 14.25 2,750 8.11 14.25 916 14.25
------- -------
$ 0.33 to $ 14.25 718,357 8.42 $ 4.77 506,272 $ 5.26
======= =======

In addition, the Company has an employee stock purchase plan which allows
employees to purchase directly from the Company shares of the Company's common
stock at a 15% discount from the market price, and to pay the purchase price in
installments by payroll deductions. The Company has reserved 150,000 shares for
granting under the employee stock purchase plan. During 1997, 83,906 shares of
common stock were purchased under this plan at an average price of $1.41. During
1996 and 1995, 19,737 and 14,938 shares of common stock were purchased under
this plan at average prices of $4.95 and $9.04, respectively, prior to
considering the impact of the stock dividend. As of December 28, 1996, the
Company's employee stock purchase plan liability (included under the caption
"Payroll Related Liabilities" in the accompanying balance sheets) totaled
$230,000. There was no such liability as of December 27, 1997.

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

7. Stockholders' Equity (continued)

Stock Options and Stock Purchase Plans (continued)

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 ("FAS 123"), "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation," requires the Company to provide pro forma information
regarding net income and earnings per share as if such compensation cost for the
Company's stock option and purchase plans had been determined in accordance with
the fair value based method prescribed in FAS 123. The Company estimates the
fair value of each stock option at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for
grants in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively: 0% dividend yield; expected
volatility of 30%, 19% and 19%; respectively, risk free interest rates of 5.45%,
6.37% and 6.92%; respectively, and expected lives of 3 years. For purpose of
calculating compensation cost in 1997, the offsetting effect of significant
cancellations of options granted in prior years would have resulted in a
decrease in the net loss and a decrease in the net loss per share on a pro forma
basis. This is because the effect of actual forfeitures are recognized as they
occur. Accordingly, the actual net loss and pro forma net loss for 1997 are the
same.

Under the accounting provisions of FAS 123, the Company's net loss and net loss
per share for 1997 would remain unchanged and the net loss and net loss per
share for 1996 would have been increased to the pro forma amounts indicated
below:

Net loss: 1997 1996 1995
------------- ------------------ ------------
(UNAUDITED) (SEE EXHIBIT 23.2)

As reported $(30,229,000) $(20,833,000) $(2,459,000)
Pro forma $(30,229,000) $(21,187,000) $(2,788,000)
Net loss per share:
As reported $ (2.32) $ (2.52) $ (0.31)
Pro forma $ (2.32) $ (2.56) $ (0.36)

8. Nonrecurring Charges

Restructuring - 1996
- --------------------

During 1996, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $3,028,000 for costs
associated with the Company's then planned consolidation and transfer of
manufacturing operations to Colorado Springs, Colorado and the closing of its
branch office in Japan, Nippon Pinnacle Micro. These restructuring charges
principally reflected the costs associated with early termination of existing
leases, losses from the disposal of assets and severance costs resulting from
work force reductions.

During 1996, the Japanese branch office was closed and the Irvine, California
manufacturing facility was relocated to Colorado Springs, Colorado. During
1996, charges totaling $678,000 were incurred in connection with this
restructuring, including: $421,000 for the write-off of the foreign currency
translation upon closing of the Japanese branch office; $107,000 for severance
related to the termination of employees who worked in manufacturing and
marketing functions; $150,000 for facility and lease terminations. The
remaining balance of the restructuring liability as of December 28, 1996 was
$2,350,000.

During 1997, charges totaling $806,000 were incurred in connection with the
1996 restructuring for employee severance and lease terminations and $713,000
was recorded for write-offs of leasehold improvements and other assets. As of
December 27, 1997, $568,000 of the 1996 restructuring liability was considered
to be no longer required principally as a result of more favorable lease
terminations than estimated. The $568,000 excess restructuring liability was
reversed and is reflected, net, as a reduction to nonrecurring charges in the
condensed statement of operations for the year ended December 27, 1997.

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

8. Nonrecurring Charges (continued)

Restructuring - 1997
- --------------------

During 1997, the Company recorded an amount of $2,665,000 for restructuring
charges associated with the closing of the Colorado Springs, Colorado facility
and the related personnel and additional reductions in force at its Irvine,
California facility.

The remaining balance of the combined 1997 and 1966 restructuring liability as
of December 27, 1997 was $1,501,000 which related principally to longer-term
severance agreements.

Contract Termination
- --------------------

In 1996, the Company recorded $1,200,000 for estimated costs associated with
changes to a major component contract with a key supplier.

Litigation Settlement and Professional Fees
- -------------------------------------------

During 1997, 1996, and 1995 the Company incurred $11,000, $493,000 and $732,000,
respectively, for certain professional fees related to litigation and SEC
related matters. In addition, the Company incurred $577,000 and $1,400,000 for
litigation settlement expenses in 1997 and 1995, respectively (see Note 10).

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

9. Income Taxes

Income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:

(UNAUDITED) (SEE EXHIBIT 23.2)
1997 1996 1995
------------ -------------- ----------------

Current: $ 41,000 $ (1,103,000) $ (536,000)
State 19,000 1,000 1,000
Foreign (3,000) 15,000 -
------------ -------------- ----------------
57,000 (1,087,000) (535,000)
------------ -------------- ----------------
Deferred:
Federal - 971,000 (60,000)
State - 300,000 (68,000)
------------ -------------- ----------------
- 1,271,000 (128,000)
------------ -------------- ----------------
$ 57,000 $ 184,000 $ (663,000)
============ ============== ================

Income tax expense (benefit) differs from the amount that would result from
applying the federal statutory rate as follows:

1997 1996 1995
------------ -------------- ----------------

Tax at U.S. Federal statutory rate $(10,258,000) $ (7,02,000) $(1,061,000)
State income taxes (2,314,000) 1,000 1,000
Nondeductible expenses 276,000 595,000 495,000
Tax exempt income - (1,000) (45,000)
Adjustment to deferred tax asset
valuation allowance 13,194,000 1,271,000 -
Net operating loss carryforward for which
no tax benefit has been recognized (7,033,000) 5,396,000 -
Effect of graduated rates 6,304,000
Other (112,000) (57,000) (53,000)
------------ -------------- ----------------
$ 57,000 $ 184,000 $ (663,000)
============ ============== ================

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

9. Income Taxes (continued)

The components of the deferred income tax assets are as follows:

1997 1996
---- ----
(UNAUDITED) (SEE EXHIBIT 23.2)

Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforward $ 12,505,000 $ 4,591,000
Accrued restructuring costs and
other accruals not currently deductible 643,000 995,000
Inventory obsolescence reserve 3,422,000 430,000
Furniture and equipment 562,000 353,000
Sales returns and allowances for doubtful accounts 1,245,000 294,000
Research and development credit carryforward 400,000 190,000
Other (601,000) 127,000
------------ -----------
Total deferred tax assets 18,176,000 6,980,000
Valuation allowance (18,176,000) (6,980,000)
------------ -----------
Net deferred tax asset $ - $ -
============ ===========

A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As a result of
the Company's significant losses in 1997 and 1996 and uncertainties surrounding
the realization of the net operating loss carryforwards which were generated
during 1997 and 1996, management has determined that the realization of the
deferred tax assets is not more likely than not. Accordingly, 100% valuation
allowances have been recorded. The net change in the total valuation allowances
for the years ended December 27, 1997 and December 28, 1996, were increases of
$11,196,000 and $6,980,000, respectively. There was no change in the valuation
allowance during 1995. The amount of the valuation allowance could be reduced
if estimates of the future taxable income are increased.

At December 27, 1997, the Company has a federal tax net operating loss
carryforward of approximately $33,118,000, which expires in 2011 and 2012 and a
state net operating loss carryforward of approximately $14,086,000 which expires
in 2000, 2001, and 2002.

10. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings
- -----------------

In the fourth quarter of 1995, the Company reached a settlement agreement with
the plaintiffs who filed the November 20, 1994, class action complaint against
the Company, certain of its officers and directors and the Company's then
independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP. This complaint resulted from the
Company's restatement of prior financial statements which, most significantly,
required approximately $2,400,000 of revenue, $1,400,000 of cost of good sold
and $70,000 of selling, general and administrative expenses previously reported
as earned or incurred in the quarter ended December 31, 1993 to be reported
instead as being earned or incurred in the quarter ended March 31, 1994. The
complaint alleged various violations of Federal Securities Laws and claimed
unspecified compensatory damages and related fees and costs. The complaint was
filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California
under the case name of Kurtz, et al. v. Blum, et al., Case No. SACV94-1043-GLT.
The settlement agreement with the plaintiffs concerning this litigation required
a cash payment of $925,000 and the issuance of shares of the Company's common
stock with a value of $1,400,000. Pursuant to this settlement, the Company's
insurance carrier paid $925,000 in cash in December 1995, in connection with a
Directors and Officers liability policy purchased by the Company. The Company
issued 190,084 shares of common stock valued at $1,400,000 to the plaintiff
class and its attorneys during 1996. A provision for this $1,400,000 litigation
settlement was included as part of nonrecurring charges in the accompanying 1995
statement of operations (see Note 8).

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

10. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

The Company and certain members or former members of its senior management have
been the subject of an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "SEC") relating principally to the restatement of the Company's previously-
reported financial results. The Company and its management have been
cooperating fully with the investigation.

The resignation of the Company's prior independent public accountants on
February 20, 1996, led to additional inquiries by the SEC. These inquiries
relate principally to the 1995 accounting adjustment matters discussed in Note
13. The Company and its management continue to cooperate fully with the SEC.

On March 15, 1996, a complaint was filed against the Company and certain of its
officers and directors in a securities class action lawsuit which alleges that
Company management engaged in improper accounting practices and made certain
false and misleading statements. The complaint was filed in the United States
District Court for the Central District of California under the case name Wills,
Cohen, et al. v. William Blum et al., Case No. SACV96-261GLT. The Company
denies all allegations and intends to vigorously contest the suit. The ultimate
outcome of this matter cannot presently be determined. Accordingly, no
provision for any liability that may result has been made in the accompanying
financial statements. However, any adverse determination with respect to the
pending lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
statements. The Company may incur significant legal costs relating to this suit
in 1997.

The Company is also subject to other legal proceedings and claims which arise in
the normal course of business. While the outcome of these proceedings cannot be
predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that the outcome of these
other legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company's
financial statements.

Operating Leases
- ----------------

The Company leases its facilities and equipment under various noncancellable
operating leases for terms of up to five years. Future minimum lease payments
under these leases as of December 27, 1997 are as follows:

(UNAUDITED)

1998 $291,000
1999 47,000
2000 35,000
2001 35,000
2002 35,000
--------
$443,000
--------

Rent expense for 1997 was approximately $2,297,000 which included $721,000 in
costs associated with lease terminations, which costs are included in
nonrecurring charges in the Statements of Operations. Rent expense was
approximately $1,650,000 and $1,531,000 for 1996 and 1995, respectively.

11. Employee Benefits

The Company maintains an elective retirement savings plan which is intended to
qualify under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Participating
employees are allowed to contribute up to 15% of their cash compensation. The
Company can make contributions to the plan at the discretion of management.
There were no contributions to the plan in 1997 or 1996. The year 1996 was the
first year of the plan.

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

12. Major Customers, Export Sales and Geographic Segment Information

For 1997, 1996 and 1995, the Company had product sales to one distributor of
approximately $7,190,000, $10,847,000 and $10,965,000 or 23%, 18% and 15%,
respectively, of the Company's net sales. The accounts receivable balances from
this distributor were $735,000 and $2,820,000 or 10% and 24% of total accounts
receivable at December 27, 1997 and December 28, 1996, respectively.

The Company's United States operations include export sales of $4,068,000,
$6,568,000 and $10,589,000 for 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The Company
exports products direct from the United States to its international customers.
Prior to the fourth quarter of 1997, foreign operations were comprised of sales
offices in the Netherlands and Japan which were branches of the Company and
which were closed in 1997 and 1996, respectively. Inventory was transferred to
each of these sales offices at the Company's manufacturing cost. A summary of
the Company's operations by geographic region is as follows:

1997 1996 1995
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(UNAUDITED) (SEE EXHIBIT 23.2)

Net sales:
United States $ 27,057,000 $ 48,489,000 $64,142,000
Europe 4,067,000 9,838,000 15,543,000
Japan 0 1,594,000 2,159,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 31,124,000 $ 59,921,000 $81,844,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Operating income (loss):
United States $(30,066,000) $(17,571,000) $(3,761,000)
Europe (163,000) (221,000) 1,096,000
Japan 0 (671,000) (609,000)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
$(30,229,000) $(18,463,000) $(3,274,000)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identifiable assets:
United States $ 12,544,000 $ 37,990,000 $26,912,000
Europe 0 1,955,000 3,062,000
Japan 0 293,000 2,031,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total assets $ 12,544,000 $ 40,238,000 $32,005,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

13. Fourth Quarter Adjustments

1996 Adjustments
- ----------------

The Company originally accounted for its convertible debentures (see Note 5) in
accordance with APB 14, "Accounting for Convertible Debentures and Debt Issued
with Stock Purchase Warrants." According to the views of certain members of the
Staff of the SEC, which the Company learned in December 1996, convertible debt
instruments which are convertible at a discount to market should be accounted
for by treating such discount as additional interest expense. The Company
conformed to those views and computed the amount of the discount based on the
difference between the conversion price and fair value of the underlying common
stock on the date the debentures were issued. In the fourth quarter of 1996,
the Company recorded $1,721,000 of non-cash interest expense related to the
embedded interest in the convertible debentures. Of this amount, $1,286,000
should have been recorded as interest expense in the third quarter. If this
amount had been properly recorded, net loss would have increased by $1,286,000
($0.16 per share) in the third quarter and decreased by $1,286,000 ($0.14 per
share) in the fourth quarter. The Company considers these amounts to be
material and therefore has restated its financial statements for the quarterly
period ended September 28, 1996 on Form 10-Q/A for that period.

1995 Adjustments
- ----------------

The Company previously capitalized certain non-recurring engineering
expenditures for 1994 and the quarters ended April 1, July 1 and September 30,
1995, which expenditures primarily related to design and development of
components incorporated into certain of the Company's products. The Company
since determined the capitalization of these amounts was not appropriate. The
amounts should have been accounted for as research and development and expensed
as incurred. The aggregate amount of capitalized expenditures for 1994 and 1995
were $138,000 and $429,000, respectively.

The amounts capitalized in 1995 and the aggregate effect of such amounts if they
had been properly expensed are as follows:

Aggregate Effect on
Quarter Amount -----------------------------------
Ended Capitalized Net Income Net Income Per Share
----- ----------- ----------- ---------------------

April 1 $ 38,000 $ (23,000) $ -
July 1 69,000 (42,000) -
September 30 322,000 (198,000) (.03)
--------
Total $429,000
========

The Company considers the $322,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 1995 to
be material and restated the financial statements in the Form 10-Q/A for that
period. The Company considers the $38,000 for the quarter ended April 1, 1995,
the $69,000 for the quarter ended July 1, 1995 and the $138,000 for 1994 to be
immaterial and therefore has not restated the financial statements for those
periods. For the aforementioned periods which have not been restated, the total
amount of $245,000 was charged to research and development expense for the
quarter ended December 30, 1995. The aggregate effect of such adjustments in
the quarter ended December 30, 1995 was to increase the net loss by $151,000 or
$.02 per share.

14. Related Party Transaction

The Company has a month to month consulting contract for marketing and
advertising services with an entity owned by the son of the Company's Chairman
of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
This other entity also subleases space from the Company on a month to month
basis. Total marketing and advertising expense incurred for these services in
1997 was $66,000. Total rental income earned under the sublease was $6,075.

Schedule II

PINNACLE MICRO, INC.

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

December 27, 1997

(UNAUDITED)
Balance at Charged to Balance at
Beginning Costs and End of
Description of Period Expenses Deductions Period
----------- ---------- ----------- -------------- ------------

Year ended December 27, 1997:
Deducted from asset accounts:
Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 336,000 $ 122,000 $ (7,000)* 451,000
Allowance for product returns and price protection 412,000 7,492,000 (5,449,000) 2,455,000
Inventory obsolescence reserve 1,095,000 9,274,000 (2,381,000)** 7,988,000
Deferred valuation allowance 6,980,000 11,196,000 - 18,176,000

Year ended December 27, 1996: (SEE EXHIBIT 23.2)
Deducted from asset accounts:
Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 350,000 $ 369,000 $ (383,000)* $ 336,000
Allowance for product returns and price protection 828,000 999,000 (1,415,000) 412,000
Inventory obsolescence reserve 783,000 866,000 (554,000)** 1,095,000
Deferred valuation allowance - 6,980,000 - 6,980,000

Year ended December 30, 1995:
Deducted from asset accounts:
Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 287,000 $ 230,000 $ (167,000)* $ 350,000
Allowance for product returns and price protection 700,000 128,000 - 828,000
Inventory obsolescence reserve 683,000 871,000 (771,000)** 783,000
Deferred valuation allowance - - - -

- ----------------------------------
* Doubtful accounts written off.
** Disposal of obsolete inventory.