[Rutan and Tucker, LLP Letterhead]





                                 August 28, 2008



VIA FEDEX AND EDGAR CORRESPONDENCE


Russell Mancuso, Esq.
Branch Chief
Division of Corporation Finance
Securities and Exchange Commission
Mail Stop 6010
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549

         Re:      Strasbaugh
                  Registration Statement on Form S-1
                  Amended August 28, 2008
                  FILE NO. 333-144787

Dear Mr. Mancuso:

         This letter responds to the comments contained in your letter dated
August 12, 2008 relating to Strasbaugh (the "Company"), a copy of which letter
is enclosed for your convenience.

         The enclosed clean and marked-to-show-changes copies of Form S-1/A
(Amendment No. 7 to Form SB-2), Reg. No. 333-144787 (the "Registration
Statement"), contain revisions that are directly in response to your comments.
We have reproduced below in bold font each of your comments set forth in your
letter of August 12, 2008, together with our responses in regular font
immediately following each reproduced comment. Our responses in this letter
correspond to the numbers you placed adjacent to your comments in your letter.
The page numbers referenced below correspond to the marked versions of the
Registration Statement enclosed herewith.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, PAGE 23

1.       PLEASE UPDATE YOUR DISCLOSURE IN THE THIRD FULL PARAGRAPH ON PAGE 33 TO
         A DATE MORE CURRENT THAN SEPTEMBER 30, 2007.

         The Company has updated its disclosure on page 33 of the Registration
Statement to provide information as of June 30, 2008.





Russell Mancuso, Esq.
August 28, 2008
Page 2


PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION PAGE 90

2.       IT IS GENERALLY INCONSISTENT WITH SECTION 5 OF THE SECURITIES ACT TO
         AMEND THE TERMS OF A PRIVATE PLACEMENT WHILE THE RELATED SECURITIES ARE
         THE SUBJECT OF A PENDING REGISTRATION STATEMENT. PLEASE TELL US HOW THE
         AMENDMENT YOU PROPOSE IN YOUR RESPONSE TO PRIOR COMMENT 6 IS CONSISTENT
         WITH SECTION 5. INCLUDE IN YOUR RESPONSE WHETHER THE AMENDMENT REFLECTS
         THE INTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES AT THE TIME THAT THE AGREEMENT WAS
         ORIGINALLY EXECUTED IN MAY 2007.

         The amendment we attached as an exhibit to our response letter dated
July 28, 2008 reflects the initial agreement between the parties dated May 24,
2007. Therefore, consistent with the Staff's position that a private placement
must be completed prior to the filing of a resale registration statement, the
amendment does not jeopardize the private placement's status as complete and the
Section 4(2) exemption from the registration requirements of Section 5 of the
Securities Act remains available with respect to the private placement.(1)

         On May 24, 2007 the private placement was complete because as of that
date: (i) each investor was irrevocably committed to purchasing a set number of
securities at a set price, (ii) all of the investors were at market risk as a
result of their irrevocable commitment, (iii) the closing of the private
placement was not subject to any conditions whose satisfaction were within the
investors' control, (iv) each of the investors had fully paid the purchase price
for the securities, and (v) the securities were in fact issued to the investors.

         The amendment embodies the initial agreement of the parties and serves
as an instrument of clarification rather than as an instrument pursuant to which
the terms of the initial private placement are modified. To further clarify that
the amendment (i) reflects the initial agreement between the parties and (ii) is
only necessary inasmuch as the initial documents do not clearly evidence the
parties' initial agreement with respect to the subject matter of the amendment,
we have attached a revised agreement as EXHIBIT A to this letter (the
"Clarification Agreement")(2). As the Clarification Agreement represents the
initial agreement of the parties, entering into the Clarification Agreement does
not amount to a new investment decision on the part of the selling security
holders. Further, as the Clarification Agreement reflects the initial agreement
of the parties and does not amend the terms of the private placement, the status
of private placement as "complete" remains intact. Consequently, after May 24,
2007, none of the terms of the private placement were renegotiated or modified
in any manner. Therefore, on May 24, 2007, prior to the filing of the
registration statement, the private placement was complete.

- ---------------

(1) SEE E.G., Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available
Telephone Interpretations Supplement - March 1999, #3S(b) and 4S.

(2) To further substantiate that the Clarification Agreement evidences the
initial agreement of the parties, the parties will certify to such effect in
Section 3 of the Clarification Agreement.



Russell Mancuso, Esq.
August 28, 2008
Page 3


         In light of the Staff's comment and our response to this Comment No. 2,
a revised letter of transmittal is attached as EXHIBIT B hereto. The Company's
intention is that the Clarification Agreement will be executed by the Company
and all the selling security holders prior to the effectiveness of the
Registration Statement. Upon execution of the attached agreement by the parties
thereto, the Company will file the attached agreement as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

3.       PLEASE UPDATE THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AS APPLICABLE, AS REQUIRED BY
         RULE 8- 18 OF REGULATION S-X.

         The Registration Statement has been revised to include unaudited
financial statements for the quarterly periods ended June 30, 2007 and June 30,
2008.

         If you have any questions regarding the foregoing, please call me at
(714) 641-3450.

                                                     Sincerely yours,

                                                     RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP

                                                     /S/ LARRY A. CERUTTI

                                                     Larry A. Cerutti

LAC:jss
cc:      Jay Mumford, Esq. (via FEDEX, w/enc.)
         Ms. Tara Harkins (via FEDEX, w/enc.)
         Mr. Chuck Schillings (via electronic mail, w/enc.)
         Mr. Richard Nance (via electronic mail, w/enc.)
         Mr. Fred Furry (via electronic mail, w/enc.)





                                   EXHIBIT A

                         WARRANT CLARIFICATION AGREEMENT


         THIS WARRANT CLARIFICATION AGREEMENT ("CLARIFICATION AGREEMENT") is
made as of the __ day of August, 2008, by and among Strasbaugh, a California
corporation (the "Company"), and each of the investors identified on the
Schedule of Investors attached hereto as EXHIBIT A (individually an "INVESTOR"
and collectively, the "INVESTORS").

                                    RECITALS
                                    --------

         A. The Company and the Investors (the "PARTIES") entered into that
certain Securities Purchase Agreement dated May 24, 2007 (the "PURCHASE
AGREEMENT"), pursuant to which the Company issued to the Investors, among other
securities, warrants (the "WARRANTS") to purchase shares of the Company's common
stock.

         B. The Warrants issued pursuant to the Purchase Agreement may not be
exercised, offered or sold in the absence of an exemption from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "SECURITIES ACT").

         C. Each of the Purchase Agreement and the Warrants contains a
restricted securities legend with respect to the exercise, offer and/or sale of
the Warrants.

         D. It has come to the attention of the Company that the description of
the restricted securities legend contained in the Purchase Agreement is not
consistent with the restricted securities legend contained in the Warrant and in
neither case does the restricted securities legend accurately describe the
Parties' initial agreement with respect to the limitations on transfer.

         E. The Parties now desire to amend certain provisions of each of the
Purchase Agreement and the Warrant to clarify the transfer restrictions imposed
upon the Warrants and to make each consistent with the other, so as to
accurately evidence the initial agreement of the Parties at the time the Parties
entered into the Purchase Agreement and the Warrant on May 24, 2007.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the
respective promises and agreements of the parties set forth herein, and for good
and valuable consideration, the amount and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1. DEFINITIONS. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined
herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Purchase
Agreement.

         2. AMENDMENTS.

              (a) Section 5.1(a) of the Purchase Agreement is hereby amended by
         deleting such section in its entirety and inserting in its place the
         following:



                   "(a) The Investors covenant that the Securities will only be
              disposed of pursuant to an effective registration statement under,
              and in compliance with the requirements of, the Securities Act or
              pursuant to an available exemption from the registration
              requirements of the Securities Act, and in compliance with any
              applicable state securities laws. The Investors further covenant
              that the Warrants will be exercised in compliance with the
              requirements of, the Securities Act pursuant to an available
              exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act
              and in compliance with any applicable state securities laws. In
              connection with any transfer of Securities other than pursuant to
              an effective registration statement or to the Company, the Company
              may require the transferor to provide to the Company an opinion of
              counsel selected by the transferor, the form and substance of
              which opinion shall be reasonably satisfactory to the Company, to
              the effect that such transfer does not require registration under
              the Securities Act. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company
              hereby consents to and agrees to register on the books of the
              Company and with its transfer agent, without any such legal
              opinion, except to the extent that the transfer agent requests
              such legal opinion, any transfer of Securities by an Investor to
              an Affiliate of such Investor, provided that the transferee
              certifies to the Company that it is an "accredited investor" as
              defined in Rule 501(a) under the Securities Act and provided that
              such Affiliate does not request any removal of any existing
              legends on any certificate evidencing the Securities."

              (b) Section 5.1(b) of the Purchase Agreement is hereby amended by
         deleting such section in its entirety and inserting in its place the
         following:

                   "(b) The certificates representing the Securities will bear a
              legend denoting the restrictions on transfer. Each Investor agrees
              to sell, assign, transfer, exercise or convert the Securities only
              in accordance with such restrictions, as applicable. The Investors
              agree to the imprinting, so long as is required by this SECTION
              5.1(b), of a legend which shall be in substantially the following
              form on any certificate evidencing any of the Securities:

                           NEITHER THESE SECURITIES NOR THE SECURITIES ISSUABLE
                           UPON THE [EXERCISE/CONVERSION] OF THESE SECURITIES
                           HAVE BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF
                           1933, AS AMENDED (THE "SECURITIES ACT"), OR ANY STATE
                           SECURITIES LAWS. THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED HEREBY
                           MAY NOT BE EXERCISED, OFFERED, SOLD, TRANSFERRED,
                           PLEDGED, HYPOTHECATED OR OTHERWISE ASSIGNED EXCEPT
                           (A) PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
                           UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR PURSUANT TO AN AVAILABLE
                           EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO,
                           THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT



                           AND (B) IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATE
                           SECURITIES LAWS, AS EVIDENCED BY A LEGAL OPINION OF
                           COUNSEL TO THE TRANSFEROR TO SUCH EFFECT (TO THE
                           EXTENT REQUESTED BY COUNSEL OF THE COMPANY), THE
                           SUBSTANCE OF WHICH SHALL BE REASONABLY ACCEPTABLE TO
                           THE COMPANY. THE HOLDER HEREOF AGREES THAT IT WILL
                           DELIVER, OR CAUSE TO BE DELIVERED, TO EACH PERSON TO
                           WHOM THE SECURITIES HEREBY REPRESENTED ARE
                           TRANSFERRED A NOTICE SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE EFFECT OF
                           THIS LEGEND. THESE SECURITIES AND THE SECURITIES
                           ISSUABLE UPON [EXERCISE/CONVERSION] OF THESE
                           SECURITIES MAY BE PLEDGED IN CONNECTION WITH A BONA
                           FIDE MARGIN ACCOUNT SECURED BY SUCH SECURITIES.

              Certificates evidencing Securities shall not be required to
         contain such legend (i) while a registration statement (including the
         Registration Statement) covering the resale of the Securities is
         effective under the Securities Act, (ii) following any sale of such
         Securities pursuant to Rule 144 if the holder provides the Company with
         a legal opinion (and the documents upon which the legal opinion is
         based) reasonable acceptance to the Company to the effect that the
         Securities (including the Securities that maybe issued upon exercise or
         conversion of the Securities) can be sold under Rule 144, (iii) if the
         holder provides the Company with a legal opinion (and the documents
         upon which the legal opinion is based) reasonably acceptable to the
         Company to the effect that the Securities (including the Securities
         that maybe issued upon exercise or conversion of the Securities) are
         eligible for sale under Rule 144(b), or (iv) if the holder provides the
         Company with a legal opinion (and the documents upon which the legal
         opinion is based) reasonably acceptable to the Company to the effect
         that the legend is not required under applicable requirements of the
         Securities Act (including controlling judicial interpretations and
         pronouncements issued by the Staff of the SEC)."

              (c) The legend that appears on the face of each of the Warrants
         issued pursuant to the Purchase Agreement are hereby amended by
         deleting such legend in its entirety and inserting in its place a
         legend substantially in the form of the legend appearing in Section 2.2
         of this Clarification Agreement.

         3. Clarifications. The Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that the
provisions set forth in Section 2 of this Clarification Agreement evidence the
understandings and agreements of the Parties at the time the Parties entered
into the Purchase Agreement and the Warrants on May 24, 2007.

         4. Miscellaneous. Except as modified and amended pursuant to this
Clarification Agreement, the Purchase Agreement and the Warrants shall remain in
full force and effect. This Amendment may be executed in one or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken
together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Amendment will
become binding on each Investor when one or more counterparts hereof,
individually or taken together, will bear the signatures of such Investor and
the Company as signatories.






         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Warrant
Clarification Agreement to be duly executed by their respective authorized
signatories as of the date first indicated above.

The Company:                            STRASBAUGH


                                        By: /s/ Richard Nance
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Richard Nance
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer



Investor:                               [_______________________]


                                        By:______________________
                                        Name:
                                        Title:



                                   EXHIBIT B


                                ________ __, 2008


- ----------------------

- ----------------------

- ----------------------

- ----------------------

         Re:      Warrant Clarification Agreement
                  -------------------------------

Dear ______________:

         As you know, Strasbaugh (the "Company") is in the process of
registering for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), shares of the Company's common stock underlying the Company's
preferred stock and warrants (the "Securities") you purchased pursuant to the
terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement dated May 24, 2007 between you, the
Company and certain other parties (the "Purchase Agreement").

         In connection with the registration of the Securities, the staff of the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Staff") has expressed concerns that a
situation may arise in the future whereby the warrants issued pursuant to the
Purchase Agreement may be exercised by a transferee in violation of the
Securities Act. This concern does not affect the initial purchasers of the
warrants. YOU, AS AN INITIAL PURCHASER, MAY EXERCISE THE WARRANT YOU HOLD AT ANY
TIME IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE WARRANT. YOU MAY ALSO TRANSFER OR SELL
THE WARRANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE WARRANT.

         However, as you know, the Company and each of the parties to the
Purchase Agreement agreed that the Warrants would not be exercised in violation
of the Securities Act. Therefore, to (i) properly evidence our initial agreement
that the warrants will not be exercised in violation of the Securities Act BY A
PERSON TO WHOM YOU MAY HAVE TRANSFERRED THE WARRANT, and (ii) correct a
discrepancy between the description of the restricted securities legend
contained in the Purchase Agreement and the restricted securities legend in the
warrant, we desire to amend the Purchase Agreement and the warrants issued
thereunder to clarify our collective original intentions that the warrants will
not be exercised by the holders thereof in the absence of an exemption from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act. As such, find enclosed a
"Warrant Clarification Agreement" for your review and execution.

         The revised legend clarifies that the Company has the authority to
require a holder of a warrant to provide the Company with a legal opinion
reasonably acceptable to the Company to the effect that THE WARRANT AND THE
SECURITIES UNDERLYING THE WARRANT are eligible for sale under Rule 144 prior to
removing the legend from a warrant based on a request that the warrant be
removed in connection with Rule 144. Because a situation may arise where a
warrant may be transferred by a holder to a transferee and then exercised by


________________________
________ __, 2008
Page 2


such transferee in the absence of an exemption from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act if the warrant did not contain a restricted
securities legend, we have concluded, with the assistance of our legal counsel,
that it is not possible for anyone to provide the Company with a legal opinion
that is "reasonably acceptable" to the Company to the effect that the restricted
securities legend may be removed from the warrant. Clearly, there was never any
intent on the part of the Company or any investor that is a party to the
Purchase Agreement to allow for the resale of the warrants without the inclusion
of the restricted securities legend. Consequently, please be advised that any
request to remove the restricted legend from any of the warrants issued pursuant
to the Purchase Agreement will not be accepted by the Company. Additionally,
please be advised that consistent with the original intentions and agreements of
the parties and pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement and Registration
Rights Agreement relating to your investment in the Company's preferred stock
and warrants, the Company is not obligated to, and will not, register for resale
under the Securities Act any of the warrants.

         UPON YOUR REVIEW OF THE ENCLOSED WARRANT CLARIFICATION AGREEMENT,
PLEASE FAX AN EXECUTED COPY OF THE DOCUMENT TO MY ATTENTION AT ______________ AS
SOON AS POSSIBLE. In light of the fact that in all likelihood the Staff will not
allow the Company to register for resale the shares of common stock underlying
the warrants in the absence of the Warrant Clarification Agreement, the Company
requests that you execute this document as soon as possible. If you have any
questions regarding the foregoing, please call me at 805-541-6424.

                                                     Very truly yours,


                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Richard Nance,
                                                     Chief Financial Officer