SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO
SCHEDULE 14A
_______________________________________
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
_______________________________________
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]
Check the appropriate box:
[X] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[_] Confidential, For Use Of The Commission Only (As Permitted By
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[_] Definitive Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive Additional Materials
[_] Soliciting Material Pursuant Rule to 14a-11 or Rule 14a-12
BLACK HAWK GAMING & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
NONE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[_] No fee required.
[X] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and
0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
Common Stock, Par Value $.001 per share, of Black Hawk Gaming &
------------------------------------------------------------------
Development Company, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
2,821,067 shares of common stock and 516,417 options to purchase shares
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
of common stock.
----------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which
the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
The filing fee of $7,397 was determined based upon the sum of (a) the
product of 2,821,067 shares of common stock and the merger
consideration of $12.00 per share and (b) the difference between $12.00
and the exercise price per share of common stock of each of the 516,417
shares covered by outstanding options. In accordance with Rule 0-11
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the filing fee
was determined by multiplying the amount calculated pursuant to the
preceding sentence by 1/50 of one percent.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
$36,984,724
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid herewith $-0-
[X] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: $7,397
[_] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
Filed: November 30, 2001
PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT
BLACK HAWK GAMING & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
240 Main Street
Black Hawk, Colorado 80422
(303) 582-1117
Dear Shareholder: December 7, 2001
You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of shareholders of
Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc. to be held at the Hilton Garden
Inn, Denver International Airport, 16475 E. 40th Circle, Aurora Colorado 80011
on Friday, January 4, 2002 at 11:00 a.m., Mountain Time.
At the special meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon the
approval of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 25, 2001, by and
among Gameco, Inc., BH Acquisition Corp. and Black Hawk, providing for the
merger of BH Acquisition, a wholly owned subsidiary of Gameco, with and into
Black Hawk with Black Hawk as the surviving corporation. Pursuant to the merger
agreement, you will be entitled to receive $12 in cash, without interest, for
each of your shares of common stock of Black Hawk. Gameco is and after the
merger will be controlled by Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Black Hawk. The accompanying proxy
statement explains the proposed merger and provides specific information
concerning the special meeting. Please read these materials carefully.
In light of the conflicting interests of Mr. Jacobs and some of the other
board members, Black Hawk's board of directors formed a special committee of
independent directors to evaluate this merger proposal and other possible
proposals and indications of interest in Black Hawk, and to negotiate the
proposals, including the terms of the merger agreement with Gameco and BH
Acquisition and related agreements.
The board of directors of Black Hawk, considering among other things the
unanimous recommendation of the special committee, has approved the merger
agreement and determined the merger to be advisable. Board approval was
unanimous with the exception of Mr. Jacobs, who abstained in light of his
personal interest in the proposed transaction. The special committee and the
board of directors believe that the terms and provisions of the merger agreement
and the proposed merger are fair to and in the best interests of Black Hawk's
unaffiliated shareholders (which means the holders of Black Hawk stock other
than Gameco, BH Acquisition and their affiliates). Therefore, the board of
directors recommends that you vote in favor of the approval of the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. Robertson Stephens, Inc.,
the special committee's financial advisor, has provided its written opinion
that, as of April 23, 2001, based on and subject to the limitations, assumptions
and qualifications stated in its opinion, the $12 per share cash consideration
to be received by Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders in the proposed merger
was fair to Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders from a financial point of
view.
The proposed merger is an important decision for Black Hawk and its
shareholders. The proposed merger cannot occur unless, among other things, the
merger agreement is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of all outstanding shares of common stock of Black Hawk. Diversified
Opportunities Group Ltd., an affiliate of Jeffrey P. Jacobs, and Black Hawk have
entered into a voting agreement under which Diversified will vote its 1,333,333
shares or 32.1% of Black Hawk's outstanding shares for the merger. Robert D.
Greenlee, a significant shareholder and Black Hawk have also entered into a
voting agreement under which Mr. Greenlee will vote his 486,113 shares or 11.7%
of Black Hawk's outstanding shares for the merger. Frank B. Day, a director of
Black Hawk, has indicated to Black Hawk that he intends to vote his 497,211
shares, or approximately 12% of Black Hawk's outstanding shares, for the merger.
Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting, I urge you to sign,
date and promptly return the enclosed proxy card to ensure that your shares will
be voted at the special meeting. Failure to return an executed proxy card will
constitute, in effect, a vote against approval of the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby.
Your board of directors urges you to consider the enclosed materials
carefully and, based on among other things the recommendation of the special
committee and the board, recommends that you vote "for" approval of the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.
Sincerely,
Patrick McDuff
Chairman of the Special Committee of the Board
of Directors
This transaction has not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and
Exchange Commission or any state securities regulator nor has the Commission or
any state securities regulator passed upon the fairness or merits of the
transaction or upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information contained in
this document. Any representation to the contrary is unlawful.
This proxy statement and proxy are being mailed to Black Hawk's
shareholders on or about December 7, 2001.
BLACK HAWK GAMING & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
240 Main Street
Black Hawk, Colorado 80422
(303) 582-1117
Notice of Special Meeting of Shareholders
Date: January 4, 2002
Time: 11:00 a.m., Daylight Time
Place: Hilton Garden Inn, Denver International Airport, 16475 E.40th
--
Circle Aurora, Colorado 80011
A special meeting of the shareholders of Black Hawk Gaming & Development
Company, Inc. is being held for the following purposes:
. To consider and vote upon the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as
of April 25, 2001, by and among Gameco, Inc., BH Acquisition Corp. and
Black Hawk, and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the
merger of BH Acquisition with and into Black Hawk, with Black Hawk as
the surviving corporation and with the unaffiliated shareholders of
Black Hawk entitled to receive $12 in cash, without interest, for each
share of Black Hawk's common stock that they own.
. To consider any other matter that may properly be brought before the
special meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
Only shareholders of record on November 30, 2001 are entitled to notice
of, and to vote at, the special meeting. During the ten day period prior to the
special meeting, any shareholder may examine a list of Black Hawk's shareholders
of record, for any purpose related to the special meeting, during ordinary
business hours at the offices of Black Hawk located at 240 Main Street, Black
Hawk, Colorado 80422.
Shareholders of Black Hawk who do not vote in favor of the merger agreement
will have the right to dissent and to seek appraisal of the fair value of their
shares if the merger is completed and they comply with the procedures under
Colorado law explained in the accompanying proxy statement.
The merger is described in the accompanying proxy statement, which you are
urged to read carefully. A copy of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, as
amended, is attached as Annex A to the accompanying proxy statement.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Stanley Politano, Secretary
Black Hawk, Colorado
December 7, 2001
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Notice of Special Meeting of Shareholders................................................................................. i
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER.................................................................................... 1
SUMMARY................................................................................................................... 4
Principals of the Buyers................................................................................................. 4
The Special Meeting...................................................................................................... 4
Special Factors.......................................................................................................... 4
Reasons for Engaging in the Transaction.................................................................................. 5
Recommendations of the Special Committee and our Board of Directors...................................................... 5
Opinion of Robertson Stephens............................................................................................ 5
Black Hawk's Position as to the Fairness of the Merger................................................................... 5
Interests of our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger.......................................................... 6
Primary Benefits and Detriments to Unaffiliated Shareholders............................................................. 6
The Merger Agreement..................................................................................................... 6
The Merger Consideration................................................................................................ 6
Conditions to the Merger................................................................................................ 7
Termination of the Merger Agreement..................................................................................... 7
Acquisition Proposals................................................................................................... 8
Fees and Expenses....................................................................................................... 8
Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal.......................................................................................... 9
Financing of Merger...................................................................................................... 9
Regulatory Approvals..................................................................................................... 9
Accounting Treatment..................................................................................................... 9
Tax Treatment............................................................................................................ 9
Litigation............................................................................................................... 9
Recent Acquisition....................................................................................................... 10
Selected Consolidated Financial Data of Black Hawk....................................................................... 10
THE PARTIES............................................................................................................... 12
Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc............................................................................. 12
Gameco, Inc., BH Acquisition, Inc. and Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd............................................... 12
Colonial Holdings, Inc................................................................................................... 13
Jalou L.L.C. and Jalou II................................................................................................ 13
Competition and Regulation............................................................................................... 14
SPECIAL FACTORS........................................................................................................... 15
Background of the Merger................................................................................................. 15
Recommendation of the Special Committee and Board of Directors; Fairness of the Merger................................... 21
Special Committee....................................................................................................... 21
Board of Directors of Black Hawk........................................................................................ 24
Buyers' Position as to Fairness of the Merger to Unaffiliated Shareholders............................................... 25
Benefits and Detriments of the Merger.................................................................................... 26
To Black Hawk's Unaffiliated Shareholders............................................................................... 26
To the Buyers and Black Hawk............................................................................................ 27
Opinion of Financial Advisor to the Special Committee.................................................................... 27
Opinion and Analysis of Robertson Stephens.............................................................................. 28
Comparable Companies Analysis........................................................................................... 29
Selected Precedent Transactions......................................................................................... 30
Premiums Paid Analysis.................................................................................................. 32
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis........................................................................................... 32
Other Factors........................................................................................................... 33
McDonald Investments Report
Prospective Financial Information of Black Hawk.......................................................................... 34
Buyers' Purpose and Reason for the Merger................................................................................ 36
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger; Certain Relationships....................................................... 36
Retained Equity Interest................................................................................................ 36
Shares and Stock Options................................................................................................ 36
Directors and Management of the Surviving Corporation................................................................... 37
Management Employment Agreements........................................................................................ 37
Other Arrangements with Affiliates...................................................................................... 37
Directors and Officers Indemnification and Insurance.................................................................... 38
Certain Effects of the Merger............................................................................................ 38
ii
Plans for Black Hawk after the Merger................................................................................ 38
Conduct of the Business of the Company if the Merger is not Consummated.............................................. 39
Accounting Treatment................................................................................................. 39
Financing of the Merger.............................................................................................. 39
Regulatory Requirements; Third Party Consents........................................................................ 40
Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger............................................................... 41
Sales Treatment for Holders of Common Stock......................................................................... 41
Redemption Treatment for Dissenters and Other Shareholders.......................................................... 42
Constructive Ownership of Stock and Other Issues.................................................................... 42
Section 302 Tests................................................................................................... 42
Treatment of Holders of Stock Options............................................................................... 43
Backup Withholding.................................................................................................. 44
Tax Treatment to Buyers.............................................................................................. 44
Fees and Expenses.................................................................................................... 44
INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SPECIAL MEETING............................................................................ 46
Time, Place and Date................................................................................................. 46
Purpose of the Special Meeting....................................................................................... 46
Record Date; Voting at the Meeting; Quorum........................................................................... 46
Required Vote........................................................................................................ 46
Voting and Revocation of Proxies..................................................................................... 47
Action to be Taken at the Special Meeting............................................................................ 47
Proxy Solicitation................................................................................................... 47
THE MERGER AGREEMENT.................................................................................................. 48
The Merger, Merger Consideration..................................................................................... 48
Treatment of Certain Shares Held by the Buyers....................................................................... 48
The Exchange Fund; Payment for Shares of Black Hawk Common Stock..................................................... 49
Transfers of Common Stock............................................................................................ 49
Treatment of Stock Options........................................................................................... 49
Conditions........................................................................................................... 50
Representations and Warranties....................................................................................... 51
Covenants............................................................................................................ 52
Termination.......................................................................................................... 54
Expenses and Fees.................................................................................................... 55
Amendment/Waiver..................................................................................................... 56
THE VOTING AGREEMENTS................................................................................................. 57
GAMING APPROVALS AND DELAYED CLOSING.................................................................................. 58
General.............................................................................................................. 58
Colorado Gaming Regulations.......................................................................................... 58
Nevada Gaming Regulations............................................................................................ 58
Louisiana and Virginia Gaming Regulations............................................................................ 59
Possible Delayed Closing............................................................................................. 59
DISSENTERS' RIGHTS OF APPRAISAL....................................................................................... 61
Right to Dissent...................................................................................................... 61
Procedure for Exercise of Dissenters' Rights.......................................................................... 61
Dissenters' Notice.................................................................................................... 61
Procedure to Demand Payment........................................................................................... 62
Payment............................................................................................................... 62
If Dissenter is Dissatisfied with Offer............................................................................... 62
Judicial Appraisal of Shares.......................................................................................... 62
Court and Counsel Fees................................................................................................ 63
iii
MARKET FOR THE COMMON STOCK...................................................................................... 64
Common Stock Market Price Information; Dividend Information...................................................... 64
Common Stock Purchase Information................................................................................ 64
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT................................................... 65
DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT......................................................................................... 67
Black Hawk....................................................................................................... 67
Gameco and BH Acquisition........................................................................................ 69
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS........................................................ 70
CERTAIN LITIGATION............................................................................................... 71
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS............................................................................................. 72
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS............................................................................................. 72
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION.............................................................................. 72
OTHER BUSINESS................................................................................................... 72
SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS AND PROPOSALS............................................................................... 73
AVAILABLE INFORMATION............................................................................................ 73
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION.................................................................................. F-1
ANNEX A Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 25, 2001 by and among Gameco,
Inc., BH Acquisition, Inc. and Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company,
Inc. and Amendment thereto dated November 12, 2001
ANNEX B Opinion of Robertson Stephens, Inc.
ANNEX C Sections of the Colorado Business Corporation Act Regarding Dissenter's
Rights (7-113-101 through 7-113-302)
iv
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
Q: What is the proposed transaction?
A: Gameco will acquire Black Hawk by merging BH Acquisition, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Gameco, into Black Hawk. As a result of the merger, Black
Hawk will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gameco.
Q: Who are Gameco and BH Acquisition?
A: Gameco and BH Acquisition were formed in connection with the proposed
merger by Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief
Executive Officer of Black Hawk, and certain of his affiliated entities
including Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd., which presently owns 32.1%
of Black Hawk's outstanding common stock. Diversified and Gameco are owned
beneficially by Mr. Jacobs and Richard E. Jacobs, trustee under the Richard
E. Jacobs Revocable Living Trust Agreement dated April 23, 1987 (the
"Trust"). Richard E. Jacobs is Jeffrey P. Jacobs' father. All of Gameco,
BH Acquisition, Diversified, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, the Trust and Richard E.
Jacobs are sometimes referred to herein as the "Buyers." Depending on the
context, Jeffrey P. Jacobs is sometimes identified as the natural person
designated as representing the interests of the Buyers.
Q: What will I receive in the merger?
A: Shareholders of Black Hawk, other than the Buyers and shareholders who
dissent and seek appraisal of the fair value of their shares, will be
entitled to receive $12 in cash, without interest, for each share of Black
Hawk's common stock that they own. If you own stock options of Black Hawk,
you will be entitled to receive, for each stock option, the difference
between $12 and the exercise price of such stock option.
Q: Why is the board of directors recommending that I vote for the merger at
this time?
A: The board believes that it is in the best interest of Black Hawk's
unaffiliated shareholders to accept and the opportunity presented by Mr.
Jacobs at this time to sell their shares at a substantial premium over the
market price of Black Hawk's shares in recent years. Approval of the board
of directors was unanimous with the exception of Mr. Jacobs who abstained
in light of his personal interest in the proposed transaction. To review
the background and reasons for the merger in greater detail, see pages
_____ to _____.
Q: When do you expect the merger to be completed?
A: We are working to complete the merger as quickly as possible. If the merger
agreement is approved and the other conditions to the merger are satisfied,
we expect to complete the merger shortly after receiving approval of the
Colorado and Nevada gaming authorities, which is expected in January or
February, 2002. See "Gaming Approvals and Delayed Closing," on pages ____
and ____.
Q: What are the income tax consequences of the merger to me?
A: The cash you receive for your shares generally will be taxable for federal
and state income tax purposes. To review a brief description of the federal
income tax consequences to shareholders, see pages ____ to ____.
1
Q: What conflicts of interest does the board of directors have in recommending
approval of the merger agreement?
A: One of the seven members of the board of directors, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, has
a conflict of interest in recommending approval of the merger agreement
because he is an equal beneficial owner of Gameco along with the Trust.
Another director of Black Hawk, Mr. Owendoff, performs legal services for
Mr. Jacobs and his affiliates and was nominated to Black Hawk's board by
Mr. Jacobs. A third director, Mr. Hughes, worked for Mr. Jacobs until
about three years ago; he also was nominated to Black Hawk's board by Mr.
Jacobs. A fourth board member, Mr. Knudsen, has had no direct or material
indirect relationship with the Buyers but was initially nominated to Black
Hawk's board by Mr. Jacobs three years ago. A fifth board member, Mr.
Roark, is an executive officer of Black Hawk and may be an officer of Black
Hawk or Gameco in the future. In light of the conflicting interests of Mr.
Jacobs and some of the other board members with Black Hawk's unaffiliated
shareholders as described immediately above, the board of directors formed
a special committee of three independent directors to evaluate the proposed
Merger and the alternatives available to Black Hawk and it shareholders.
To review the factors considered by the special committee and the board of
directors in approving the merger agreement, see pages _____ to _____.
Q: What did the board of directors do to make sure the price per share I will
receive in the proposed merger is fair to me?
A: The board of directors formed a special committee consisting of the three
independent directors to evaluate Black Hawk's alternatives and ultimately
to negotiate the terms of the merger agreement with the Buyers. The special
committee independently selected and retained separate legal and financial
advisors to assist in this process, and received an opinion from its
financial advisor, on which the special committee relied, stating that
based on and subject to the limitations, assumptions and qualifications
stated in that opinion, as of April 23, 2001, the $12 per share the
unaffiliated shareholders of Black Hawk will receive in the proposed merger
was fair to those shareholders from a financial point of view.
Q: What are the disadvantages to me of merging Black Hawk with BH Acquisition?
A: Following the merger, you will no longer benefit from any earnings,
expansion, diversification or growth of Black Hawk.
Q: What vote is required to approve the merger agreement?
A: The holders of a majority of all outstanding shares of Black Hawk's common
stock must vote to approve the merger agreement. The Buyers currently own
approximately 32.1% of Black Hawk's common stock and have agreed to vote
their shares for the merger. Robert D. Greenlee owns approximately 11.7% of
Black Hawk's common stock and has entered into an agreement to vote his
shares for the merger. One director and a member of the special committee,
Mr. Day, owns approximately 12% of Black Hawk's common stock and has stated
that he presently intends to vote for merger. Therefore, the votes
required to approve the merger are assured if Mr. Day votes as he has
indicated to Black Hawk. See "The Voting Agreements" on pages _____ to
_____ for more details.
Q: What do I need to do now?
A: Please mark your vote on, sign, date and mail your proxy card in the
enclosed return envelope as soon as possible, so that your shares may be
represented at the special meeting.
Q: What rights do I have if I oppose the merger?
A: Shareholders who oppose the merger may dissent and seek appraisal of the
fair value of their shares (which could be more or less than $12 per
share), but only if they comply with all of the procedures under Colorado
law explained on pages ____ to____ and in Annex C to this proxy statement.
It is a condition to the Buyer's obligation to consummate the merger that
holders of not more than 10% of the common stock exercise their dissenters'
rights.
2
Q: Who can vote on the merger?
A: All Black Hawk shareholders of record as of the close of business on
November 30, 2001 will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the
special meeting to approve the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby.
Q: Should I send in my stock certificates right now?
A: No. After the merger is completed, we will send you a transmittal form and
written instructions for exchanging your share certificates for cash.
Q: If my shares are held in "street name" by my broker, will my broker vote my
shares for me?
A: Your broker will vote your shares only if you provide instructions on how
to vote. You should follow the directions provided by your broker
regarding how to instruct your broker to vote your shares.
Q: May I change my vote after I have mailed my signed proxy card?
A: Yes. Just send a written revocation or another signed proxy card with a
later date to Corporate Stock Transfer, Inc., Black Hawk's transfer agent,
before the special meeting or simply attend the special meeting and vote in
person. Corporate Stock Transfer's address is 3200 Cherry Creek Drive
South, Suite 430, Denver, Colorado 80209.
Q: What other matters will be voted on at the special meeting?
A: We do not except that any other matter will be voted on at the special
meeting.
Q: Who can help answer my questions?
A: If you have more questions about the merger or would like additional copies
of this proxy statement, you should contact Stanley Politano, Vice
President and Secretary of Black Hawk at (303) 582-1117, ext. 7254.
Q: What happens if I do not return a proxy card?
A: You may attend the meeting in person and vote your shares. If you do not
attend and do not return a proxy, your shares will not be counted in
determining whether a quorum is present for the meeting or for any other
purpose. Since a majority of Black Hawk's shares is required to approve
the merger, your failure to return an executed proxy card or to vote in
person at the special meeting or by abstaining from the vote will, in
effect, constitute a vote against approval of the merger. Similarly,
broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote against approval of
the merger.
3
SUMMARY
The following summarizes the material aspects of the proposed merger and
highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement.
This summary may not contain all of the information that is important to you,
and is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information contained
elsewhere in this proxy statement, including the annexes to it, and in the
documents incorporated by reference. To understand the proposed merger fully
and for a more complete description of the terms of the proposed merger, you
should carefully read this entire proxy statement, including the annexes to it,
and the documents incorporated by reference.
Principals of the Buyers
Gameco, Inc. is a corporation organized by our Chief Executive Officer,
Jeffrey P. Jacobs, to acquire the ownership interests of our unaffiliated
shareholders. Mr. Jacobs also controls Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd.
which owns 32.1% of our outstanding common stock. Mr. Richard E. Jacobs,
trustee under the Richard E. Jacobs Revocable Living Trust, owns 50% of the
outstanding stock of Gameco and a 50% interest in Diversified. Richard E.
Jacobs is Jeffrey P. Jacobs' father. Jeffrey P. Jacobs proposed the merger
transaction to Black Hawk's board of directors and negotiated all aspects of the
transaction on his own behalf and on behalf of Gameco and Diversified. For more
information in this regard, see "The Parties" below.
The Special Meeting (see page ___)
A special meeting of shareholders of Black Hawk will be held at 11:00 a.m.,
Mountain Time, on Friday, January 4, 2002 at the Hilton Garden Inn, Denver
International Airport, 16475 E. 40th Circle, Aurora, Colorado 80011. At the
--
special meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote on a proposal to approve
the merger agreement described in this proxy statement.
Only Black Hawk shareholders of record at the close of business on the
record date, November 30, 2001, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at,
the special meeting. On the record date, there were 4,154,400 shares of common
stock outstanding and entitled to one vote per share at the special meeting. Our
shares are held by approximately 250 shareholders of record, although there are
about 1,600 beneficial owners of our common stock.
Colorado law requires that the holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares of Black Hawk common stock vote to approve the merger agreement. The
Buyers currently own 1,333,333 shares of Black Hawk common stock, representing
approximately 32.1% of the outstanding shares of common stock as of the record
date and have agreed to vote their shares in favor of the merger agreement. For
a more detailed description of the interests of the Buyers, see pages _____ to
_____.
Robert D. Greenlee, a shareholder who owns approximately 11.7% of Black
Hawk's common stock, has agreed to vote all of his shares in favor of the merger
agreement. Frank B. Day, a director of Black Hawk and a member of the special
committee, who owns approximately 12% of Black Hawk's common stock, has stated
that he presently intends to vote all his shares in favor of the merger
agreement. Stephen R. Roark and Stanley Politano, executive officers of Black
Hawk, also intend to vote all their shares (29,190 shares in the aggregate, or
approximately 1% of the outstanding shares) in favor of the merger agreement.
Assuming that the Buyers, Mr. Greenlee and Mr. Day vote in favor of the merger
agreement, approval of the merger agreement will be assured. See "Voting
Agreements."
Special Factors (see page ____)
There are a number of factors that you should consider in connection with
deciding how to vote your shares. They include:
. the background of the merger;
. the factors considered by the special committee and the board of
directors;
. the opinion of the financial advisor to the special committee;
. the recommendation of the special committee and the board of
directors;
4
. the purpose and effect of the merger;
. the interests of certain persons in the merger;
. the financing of the merger; and
. the need for gaming approvals and the possibility of a delayed
closing.
These factors, in addition to several other factors to be considered in
connection with the merger, are described in this proxy statement. For a
detailed discussion of each of these factors, see pages _____ to _____.
Reasons for Engaging in the Transaction (see page_____)
The sole reason for engaging in the merger, from your perspective, is to
provide you the opportunity to receive a cash price for your shares at a
significant premium over the market price at which our common stock traded
before the February 27, 2001 announcement of the Buyers' initial merger
proposal.
Recommendations of the Special Committee and our Board of Directors (see page
_____)
The special committee of our board of directors, consisting of three
independent directors, was formed to consider and evaluate Black Hawk's
alternatives, including the merger. The special committee has unanimously
approved the merger agreement and determined that the merger is in the best
interests of Black Hawk and its unaffiliated shareholders. The special
committee has unanimously recommended to our board of directors that the board
determine that the merger is advisable and in the best interests of Black Hawk
and our unaffiliated shareholders and that the merger consideration is fair to
our unaffiliated shareholders. The special committee has also unanimously
recommended that the board of directors approve the merger agreement and that
the board of directors determine to submit the merger to our shareholders and
recommend that our shareholders vote to adopt the merger agreement. Our board
of directors has determined that the merger is advisable and in the best
interests of Black Hawk and our unaffiliated shareholders and that merger
consideration is fair to Black Hawk and our unaffiliated shareholders.
Accordingly, our board of directors has approved the merger agreement and
recommends that you vote FOR the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.
Opinion of Robertson Stephens (see pages _____ to _____)
In connection with the merger, the special committee considered the opinion
of the special committee's financial advisor, Robertson Stephens, as to the
fairness of the merger consideration to our unaffiliated shareholders from a
financial point of view. Robertson Stephens delivered its opinion to the
special committee on April 23, 2001 that, as of that date and based on and
subject to the assumptions, limitations and qualifications stated in the
opinion, the consideration to be received by our unaffiliated shareholders
pursuant to the merger agreement was fair to those shareholders from a financial
point of view. Robertson Stephens' opinion was provided for the information of
the special committee and does not constitute a recommendation to any
shareholder with respect to any matter relating to the proposed merger.
Robertson Stephens' full opinion is attached as Annex B.
Black Hawk's Position as to the Fairness of the Merger (see page _____)
We believe the merger and the merger consideration to be fair to our
unaffiliated shareholders. In reaching this determination we considered a
number of factors, including:
. the fact that the merger consideration of $12 per share represents a
substantial premium over the $6.56 closing price of our common stock
on the last full trading day prior to our February 27, 2001
announcement of the initial offer by Gameco and exceeds the historical
market prices of Black Hawk's common stock for the last three years;
5
. the fact that Robertson Stephens delivered an opinion to the special
committee to the effect that as of April 23, 2001, and based on and
subject to the limitations, assumptions and qualifications contained
in that opinion, the merger consideration to be received by our
unaffiliated shareholders in the merger was fair to those shareholders
from a financial point of view; and
. the fact that the merger was unanimously approved and recommended by
the special committee following their consideration of Black Hawk's
alternatives and negotiations with Mr. Jeffrey P. Jacobs on behalf of
the Buyers.
Interests of our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger (see page _____)
In considering the recommendation of our board of directors with respect to
the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, you should be
aware that, in addition to the matters discussed above, some of our executive
officers and members of our board of directors have various interests in the
merger that are in addition to or different from the interests of our
shareholders generally and that such interests create potential conflicts of
interest.
Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, is the
controlling person of the entities that are the Buyers.
Although Mr. Jacobs will not receive cash for his shares in the merger,
other of our officers and directors will receive $6,141,540 for the shares of
Black Hawk owned by them. Mr. Jacobs will receive $695,200 in consideration for
options held by him. Our executive officers and directors have options to
purchase common stock. These options will become fully vested at the time of the
merger. Our executive officers and directors will be entitled to receive, for
each share covered by their options, an amount in cash equal to the difference
between the $12 per share merger consideration and the per share exercise price
of the related option. Not including Mr. Jacobs, our executive officers and
directors in the aggregate hold options to purchase 311,750 shares and the
aggregate amount to be paid in the merger with regard to those options is
$1,919,528. See "Shares and Stock Options" on page ___ for additional details.
Our President is also a director and is entitled to receive severance
payments if, following the merger, his employment is terminated under specified
circumstances. It is not presently expected that his employment will be
terminated following the merger.
The members of the special committee have received compensation of $75 per
hour (an aggregate of approximately $17,500 through the date hereof) from Black
Hawk in connection with serving on the special committee.
Indemnification arrangements and directors' and officers' liability
insurance for our present and former directors and officers will be continued by
the surviving corporation after the merger.
Primary Benefits and Detriments to Unaffiliated Shareholders (see page _____)
Our unaffiliated shareholders will receive a cash payment for their shares
at a premium above the market price of our shares prior to announcement of the
merger proposal. After the merger, our unaffiliated shareholders will no longer
have an interest in Black Hawk or any of its future earnings growth or increase
in value.
The Merger Agreement (see page _____).
The Merger Consideration (see page ____)
If the merger is completed, you will be entitled to receive $12 per share
in cash for each share of Black Hawk common stock you own, without interest.
6
Conditions to the Merger (see page_______)
Certain nonwaivable conditions must be satisfied before any of Black Hawk,
Gameco or BH Acquisition is obligated to complete the merger, including the
following:
. the merger must be approved by the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of common stock of Black Hawk;
. the merger must be approved by the Colorado and Nevada Gaming
Commissions;
. there must be no legal or judicial restraint or prohibition preventing
completion of the merger; and
. if applicable, the waiting period prior to consummation of the merger
under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act shall have
expired or been terminated.
Other conditions which must be satisfied unless waived by Gameco include:
. the absence of any occurrence which would reasonably be expected to
result in a material adverse effect on Black Hawk; and
. holders of not more than 10% of Black Hawk's common stock shall have
dissented from the merger in accordance with the Colorado Business
Corporation Act.
Finally, other conditions, including compliance with representations,
warranties and covenants, must be satisfied by Black Hawk or waived by Gameco
and BH Acquisition before either Gameco or BH Acquisition is obligated to
complete the merger. Similarly, compliance with additional representations,
warranties and covenants must be satisfied by Gameco and BH Acquisition or
waived by Black Hawk before Black Hawk is obligated to complete the merger. No
party anticipates waiving any condition to the Merger. Proxies would not be
resolicited from shareholders upon the waiver of any of representation, warranty
or covenant unless the waiver would be material to the voting decision of
shareholders.
Termination of the Merger Agreement (see page_____)
Black Hawk and Gameco may agree at any time (including any time after the
special meeting but before consummation of the merger) to terminate the merger
agreement. In addition, the merger agreement may be terminated:
. by either Black Hawk or Gameco if the merger is not completed by April
1, 2002;
. by either Black Hawk or Gameco if a court or governmental agency or
authority issues a non-appealable final ruling permanently restraining
or prohibiting the merger;
. by either Black Hawk or Gameco if the merger agreement is not adopted
by a majority of all outstanding shares of Black Hawk or by Gameco if
holders of more than 10% of Black Hawk's common stock dissent from the
merger;
. by either Black Hawk or Gameco, if (x) there has been a breach by the
other party of any representation or warranty contained in the merger
agreement, or (y) there has been a breach of any of the covenants or
agreements set forth in the merger agreement on the part of the other
party;
. by Black Hawk if, prior to receiving shareholder approval, Black Hawk
receives and resolves to accept a proposal superior to the merger and
pays Gameco the fee described below under "Fees and Expenses"; or
7
. by Gameco, if the board of directors of Black Hawk shall have failed
to recommend, or shall have withdrawn, modified or amended in any
material respect its approval or recommendation of, the merger, shall
have recommended a different acquisition proposal, shall have resolved
to accept a proposal it deems superior to the proposed merger, or
shall have recommended to Black Hawk's shareholders that they tender
their shares in an offer commenced by a third party.
Acquisition Proposals (see page _____)
The merger agreement provides that neither Black Hawk nor any of its
representatives may take any action to initiate, solicit, negotiate, encourage
or provide confidential information to facilitate any proposal competing with
the merger except as described below.
Black Hawk may, prior to receipt of shareholder approval of the merger and
in response to an unsolicited bona fide written offer which Black Hawk's board
of directors determines, in good faith and after consultation with its
independent financial advisor, would reasonably be expected to result in a
transaction more favorable to Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders than the
merger:
. furnish confidential or non-public information to, and negotiate with
a potential acquirer;
. terminate the merger agreement; and
. enter into another proposal which Black Hawk's board of directors, in
good faith, has determined is reasonably likely to be consummated.
We have agreed to keep Gameco informed of the status of any other proposals
and negotiations.
Fees and Expenses (see page _____)
Each party will pay the costs and expenses incurred by it in connection
with the merger and the parties will share certain printing costs and filing
fees.
Black Hawk will pay Gameco a fee of $1 million if:
. prior to obtaining shareholder approval, Black Hawk determines to
accept a proposal superior to the merger and terminates the merger
agreement; or
. Black Hawk's board of directors fails to recommend the merger
proposal, or withdraws, modifies or amends its recommendation or
recommends a competing proposal; or
. prior to the special meeting a competing proposal is announced,
shareholders do not approve the merger proposal and the announced
proposal is consummated within 12 months after termination of the
merger agreement.
Gameco will pay Black Hawk a fee of $2 million if Gameco:
. fails to consummate the merger by April 1, 2002 if the conditions to
Gameco's obligation to close the merger have been satisfied (other
than such conditions not satisfied because of a breach of a
representation, warranty or covenant of Gameco or BH Acquisition under
the merger agreement).
Any payment by Black Hawk or Gameco of the applicable fee described above
will constitute the other party's sole remedy for the circumstances giving rise
to that payment.
8
Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal (see page _____)
Any shareholder who does not wish to accept the $12 per share cash
consideration in the merger has the right under Colorado law to have his, her or
its shares appraised by a Colorado state district court. This "right of
appraisal" is subject to a number of restrictions and technical requirements.
Generally, in order to exercise appraisal rights, among other things:
. you must not vote in favor of the merger agreement; and
. you must make a written demand for appraisal in compliance with
Colorado law before the vote on the merger agreement.
Merely voting against the merger agreement will not preserve your right of
appraisal under Colorado law. Annex C to this proxy statement contains the
Colorado statute relating to your right of appraisal. Failure to follow all of
the steps required by this statute will result in the loss of your right of
appraisal.
Financing of the Merger (see pages _____ to _____)
Gameco is also proposing an acquisition of Colonial Holdings, Inc., another
public company controlled by Jeffrey P. Jacobs, our Chief Executive Officer. See
"The Parties" below for further details. Although Gameco's proposed
acquisitions of Black Hawk and Colonial Holdings are similar in structure and
purpose, they are not mutually dependent and one or the other or both or neither
may ultimately occur. The Buyers presently anticipate financing for both
acquisitions will be provided by the proceeds of an offering by Gameco of high-
yield senior debt securities. See "Special Factors--Financing of the Merger"
for further information. Since Gameco is a newly formed holding company whose
assets will be held in its subsidiaries, it will be using the assets of Black
Hawk and Colonial Holdings as collateral for the financing for the purchase of
the common stock from unaffiliated Black Hawk and Colonial Holdings
shareholders.
Regulatory Approvals (see page _____)
In order to complete the merger, approvals from the Colorado and Nevada
Gaming Commissions must be obtained, which are expected in January or February,
2002. See "Gaming Approvals and Delayed Closing." We must also file articles of
merger with the Colorado Secretary of State.
Accounting Treatment (see page _____)
The merger will be accounted for in accordance with the purchase method of
accounting under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Tax Treatment (see pages ____ and ____)
The cash you receive for your shares of our common stock generally will be
taxable for federal and state income tax purposes. Any gain or loss will be
measured by the difference between $12 per share and your tax basis in the
shares.
Litigation (see pages ____ and ____)
Along with our directors, we have been named as a defendant in two lawsuits
generally alleging that the merger consideration of $12 is grossly unfair and
that we do not have a process to maximize the price attainable for the shares of
our unaffiliated shareholders. We believe these allegations and the suits are
without merit and intend to contest them vigorously. We were also recently
named in a suit brought by Central City, Colorado and several plaintiffs against
the City of Black Hawk and many other defendants, including us. See "Certain
Litigation."
9
Recent Acquisition (see page _____)
On January 4, 2001, Black Hawk acquired the assets and business of the Gold
Dust West Casino, which is a gaming casino located in Reno, Nevada. Black Hawk
had entered into a contract to buy the casino in January, 2000 subject to gaming
approvals which took almost one year. The Gold Dust West Casino is located a
few blocks west of Reno's downtown gaming district on approximately 4.6 acres.
The casino has been successful in catering to the "locals" market for the past
22 years and has about 500 slot machines. The purchase price of $26.5 million
was financed under Black Hawk's revolving credit facility with a bank syndicate.
Black Hawk has continued the normal operation of the casino and has no immediate
plans to change or enlarge the casino's business.
Selected Consolidated Financial Data of Black Hawk
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data for
Black Hawk and its subsidiaries as of and for each of the five years in the
period ended December 31, 2000, and as of and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2000 and September 30, 2001. No pro forma data giving effect to
the proposed merger is provided because Black Hawk does not believe such
information is material to shareholders in evaluating the proposed merger since
(1) the proposed merger consideration is all cash and (2) if the proposed merger
is completed, the common stock of Black Hawk would cease to be publicly traded.
The financial information for Black Hawk as of and for each of the five
years in the period ended December 31, 2000 has been derived from the
consolidated financial statements of Black Hawk which have been audited by our
independent certified public accountants. The financial information for Black
Hawk as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2000 and September 30,
2001 has been derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of
Black Hawk which, in the opinion of Black Hawk's management, include all
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of Black Hawk's financial position
and results of operations. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring
nature. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2001
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full
year, and cannot be used to indicate financial performance for the entire year.
The following financial information should be read in conjunction with
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation" and the Consolidated Financial Statements of Black Hawk and the notes
thereto included in Black Hawk's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2000, and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2001 which are enclosed with this proxy statement and incorporated
by reference. Also please refer to "Additional Information."
10
As of or for the
Nine Months Ended
As of or for the Year Ended December 31, September 30,
---------------------------------------- -------------
(Unaudited)
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 2001 2000
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Statements of Operations Data:
Net revenues $86,375,765 $ 86,497,180 $ 49,974,960 $ 1,260,291 $ 1,263,887 $ 73,617,728 $60,741,281
Costs and expenses 72,741,115 72,036,622 42,891,229 1,382,055 1,736,688 62,842,835 48,854,766
Equity in earnings of
joint venture -- -- 1,017,789 2,812,858 2,255,635 -- --
Net income 5,460,958 5,422,798 3,212,024 1,706,321 1,046,941 3,008,701 4,844,484
Net income per common share:
Basic 1.33 1.32 .80 .64 .41 .73 1.18
Diluted 1.31 1.30 .75 .48 .39 .70 1.17
Diluted weighted average shares
outstanding 4,169,960 4,183,519 4,256,811 3,536,723 2,601,241 4,320,611 4,155,112
Balance Sheet Data:
Current assets $10,906,515 $ 12,104,183 $ 12,423,756 $ 1,267,043 $ 5,016,658 $ 17,088,341 $11,060,041
Total assets 97,476,249 101,079,942 102,062,100 49,303,530 24,523,995 128,534,198 98,356,206
Current liabilities 11,005,652 11,284,996 11,717,110 3,110,232 620,282 10,566,051 10,473,491
Convertible note payable
to shareholder -- -- -- -- 1,500,000 -- --
Long-term debt and
other liabilities 35,668,544 45,181,108 51,978,057 12,897,174 2,313,145 66,897,663 37,589,248
Common stock subject to
put options -- -- -- -- 137,499 -- --
Minority interest 8,739,694 8,115,287 7,541,523 6,704,688 1,793,500 7,241,827 8,847,582
Shareholders' equity 42,062,359 36,498,551 30,825,410 26,591,436 18,159,569 43,828,657 41,445,885
Other Data:
Book value per share $10.19 N/A N/A N/A N/A $10.60 N/A
Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges 4.07 2.49 N/A N/A N/A 2.41 4.49
The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the nine months ended September
30, 2001 would have been 2.67 if expenses related to the Merger and other non-
recurring costs incurred during the period had not been included.
11
THE PARTIES
Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc.
We are an owner, developer and operator of two gaming properties in Black
Hawk, Colorado and an owner and operator of one gaming property in Reno, Nevada.
We own the Gilpin Hotel Casino in Black Hawk, which we developed and have
operated since 1992. Along with our strategic partner, Jacobs Entertainment
Ltd., an affiliate of Gameco, we developed and co-manage The Lodge Casino at
Black Hawk, a hotel/casino/parking complex completed in the second quarter of
1998. We own, through a limited liability company, a 75% interest in The Lodge
Casino and affiliates of Jacobs Entertainment own the remaining 25% interest. On
January 4, 2001, we consummated the purchase of the Gold Dust West Casino in
Reno, Nevada, which we now operate through a wholly-owned Nevada subsidiary. We
refer to the company herein as Black Hawk and the proposed transaction as the
Merger. More complete information concerning Black Hawk can be found in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, a copy of which
is enclosed with this proxy statement and incorporated herein by this reference.
The principal office and business address of Black Hawk is Post Office Box 21,
240 Main Street, Black Hawk, Colorado 80422. The business telephone number of
Black Hawk is (303) 582-1117. For additional information concerning Black Hawk,
see "Where You Can Find More Information" and "Available Information."
Gameco, Inc., BH Acquisition, Inc. and Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd.
Gameco, Inc. is a Delaware corporation organized by Jeffrey P. Jacobs. Each
of Mr. Jacobs and Richard E. Jacobs, trustee under the Richard E. Jacobs
Revocable Living Trust Agreement dated April 23, 1987 (the "Trust"), owns 50% of
Gameco's common stock. Richard E. Jacobs is Jeffrey P. Jacobs' father. Gameco
was formed to own and conduct the business of Black Hawk, which will be a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Gameco following the Merger, and other gaming
interests currently owned by Mr. Jacobs, the Trust and Richard E. Jacobs, or to
be acquired by Gameco, as described below. BH Acquisition, Inc. is a Colorado
corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gameco. BH Acquisition, Inc. was
organized for the purpose of effecting the Merger and will be merged with and
into Black Hawk.
Immediately prior to the Merger, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, the Trust, Richard E.
Jacobs and entities under their sole control will transfer to Gameco all of the
equity interests in Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd., an Ohio limited
liability company, and certain affiliated entities. Diversified owns 1,333,333
shares, or 32.1%, of Black Hawk's outstanding common stock, and together with
those affiliated entities owns BH Entertainment Ltd., an Ohio limited liability
company. BH Entertainment owns a 25% interest in The Lodge Casino and shares
equally with Black Hawk the management fee payable by The Lodge Casino.
Diversified and those entities also own CD Entertainment Ltd., an Ohio
limited liability company that owns 33% of the Class A voting common stock and
84% of the Class B voting common stock of Colonial Holdings, Inc., a Virginia
corporation. Colonial Holdings owns and operates Colonial Downs Racetrack in New
Kent, Virginia and four satellite wagering facilities in Virginia that provide
simulcast pari-mutuel wagering on thoroughbred and standardbred horse racing.
In addition, Diversified owns Jalou L.L.C., a Louisiana limited liability
company that operates a truck stop plaza, has an interest in the gaming revenues
of a second truck stop plaza and a restaurant in Louisiana that all feature
video gaming devices. Simultaneously with the transfers described above, the
Messrs. Jacobs will transfer to Gameco their respective 50% interests in Jalou
II, Inc., a Louisiana corporation that also operates a Louisiana truck stop
plaza featuring video gaming devices. Gameco also expects to acquire immediately
prior to the Merger, through the exercise of a purchase option currently held by
Jalou L.L.C., four additional Louisiana truck stop plazas that conduct video
gaming operations.
As a result of the consummation of the Merger and these transfers and
acquisitions, Jeffrey P. Jacobs and the Trust will retain their respective 50%
ownership interests in Gameco. Black Hawk, Diversified and Jalou II will become
wholly-owned subsidiaries of Gameco, and Jalou L.L.C. will become an indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary of Gameco. Gameco, its wholly-owned subsidiary CD
Acquisition, Inc., and Colonial Holdings have entered into an Agreement and Plan
of Merger dated as of June 11, 2001 with respect to Gameco's proposed
acquisition of Colonial Holdings. While the Buyers expect that Gameco will
acquire the Louisiana operations and Colonial Holdings
12
simultaneously with the consummation of the Merger, those acquisitions are not a
condition to consummation of the Merger. Colonial Holdings will also become a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Gameco if and when that acquisition is effected.
None of Gameco, BH Acquisition or CD Acquisition has any material assets,
owns any shares of Black Hawk or Colonial Holdings, or has conducted any
activity except that incident to its formation and in connection with the
Merger, the Colonial Holdings acquisition and the related transactions described
above. The principal business of the Trust is the investment and management of
the Trust's assets for the benefit of the Trust's beneficiaries. The business
address of Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Gameco, BH Acquisition and Diversified is 1001
North U.S. Highway One, # 710, Jupiter, Florida 33477 and their business
telephone number is (561) 575-4006. The business address of the Trust and of
Richard E. Jacobs is 25425 Center Ridge Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44145 and their
business telephone number is (440) 871-4800.
In light of the anticipated transfers described above and Gameco's and
Diversified's anticipated interests in Colonial Holdings, Jalou L.L.C. and Jalou
II following consummation of the merger, certain additional information
concerning the operations of Colonial Holdings, Jalou L.L.C. and Jalou II is set
forth below. For financial information relating to these entities, see "Pro
Forma Financial Information" in this proxy statement.
Colonial Holdings, Inc.
Colonial Holdings, formerly Colonial Downs Holdings, Inc., owns and
operates Colonial Downs Racetrack in New Kent, Virginia, which primarily
conducts pari-mutuel wagering on thoroughbred and standardbred horse racing.
Colonial Holdings also owns or leases and operates satellite wagering facilities
in Chesapeake, Richmond, Hampton and Brunswick, Virginia, which provide
simulcast pari-mutuel wagering on thoroughbred and standardbred horse racing
from selected racetracks throughout the United States. Colonial Holdings sends
its live race signal from the racetrack to out-of-state satellite wagering
facilities and receives race signals from out-of-state racetracks. In February
2001, Colonial Holdings also began managing the Jalou truck stop plazas
described below.
Colonial Holdings' revenues consist of:
. pari-mutuel commissions from wagering on races broadcast from out-of-
state racetracks to Colonial Holdings' satellite facilities and the
racetrack using import simulcasting;
. wagering at the racetrack and the satellite facilities on the
racetrack's live races;
. admission fees, program and racing form sales, and certain other
ancillary activities;
. commissions from food and beverage sales and concessions;
. fees from wagering at out-of-state locations on races run at the
racetrack using export simulcasting; and
. management fees from the Jalou management activities referred to
above.
Colonial Holdings is currently subject to the information requirements of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and in accordance therewith files periodic
reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC relating to its
business, financial and other matters. Additional information regarding
Colonial Holdings can be obtained as described under "Available Information."
Jalou L.L.C. and Jalou II
Jalou L.L.C. owns and operates the Houma Truck Plaza and Casino ("Houma")
in Houma, Louisiana, and the Cajun Haven Restaurant in Lake Charles, Louisiana.
It also is party to an agreement that entitles it to a portion of the gaming
revenues from Cash's Truck Plaza and Casino ("Cash's") in Lobdell, Louisiana.
Jalou II owns and operates Winner's Choice Casino ("Winner's Choice") in
Sulphur, Louisiana. Houma, Winner's Choice and Cash's
13
each feature a convenience store, fueling operations, a restaurant, and 50 video
gaming devices. Cajun Haven is a restaurant serving breakfast and lunch on
weekdays and features three video gaming devices. These properties produced for
Jalou L.L.C. and Jalou II aggregated revenues of $10,139,000 for the period
February 8, 2001 (acquisition date) through September 30, 2001. See "Pro Forma
Financial Information" in this proxy statement.
The Jalou L.L.C. and Jalou II operations primarily serve a local clientele
that management believes prefers the convenience, small crowds, and unique
settings of these facilities to the experience and atmosphere presented by
large-scale casinos.
The four properties subject to Jalou L.L.C.'s purchase option include the
Colonel's Truck Plaza, in Thibodeaux, Louisiana, the Lucky Magnolia Truck Stop &
Casino, in St. Helena Parish, Louisiana, the Bayou Vista Truck Plaza & Casino,
in Bayou Vista, Louisiana, and Raceland Truck Plaza & Casino, in Raceland,
Louisiana. Each of these truck stop plazas features a convenience store,
fueling operations, a restaurant and 50 video gaming devices.
Competition and Regulation
The video gaming operations, like those of Black Hawk and Colonial, are
subject to substantial competition from other gaming operations of various
kinds, including riverboats, racetracks, and casinos. Similarly, these
operations, like those of Black Hawk and Colonial, are subject to extensive
regulation and substantial taxes on their gaming revenue, including a 32.5%
state tax on all gaming revenues.
For a discussion of the competitive, regulatory and tax considerations
applicable to Black Hawk, see the discussion under the headings "Business -
General Gaming Information," " -- Competition in Colorado," " -- Competition in
Reno, Nevada," " - Gaming Regulation and Licensing in Colorado," " - Nevada
Regulation and Licensing - Nevada," " - Liquor Regulation," and " - Taxation,"
in Black Hawk's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000,
a copy of which is enclosed with this proxy statement.
14
SPECIAL FACTORS
Background of the Merger
Robert D. Greenlee, along with Frank B. Day, provided the original funding
for Black Hawk and acquired his shareholdings in 1992. Mr. Greenlee was
Chairman of Black Hawk's Board of Directors until 1996 when Mr. Jacobs was added
as Co- Chairman pursuant to the agreements described below. On November 12,
1996, Black Hawk and Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd., an entity owned and
controlled by Jeffrey P. Jacobs, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and
the Trust, entered into several agreements, including:
. an agreement under which Diversified ultimately purchased 1,333,333
shares of Black Hawk's common stock at a price of $5.25 per share;
. a shareholders' agreement under which Black Hawk, Diversified, Robert
D. Greenlee and Frank B. Day, who were then directors and controlling
persons of Black Hawk, agreed to expand Black Hawk's Board of
Directors to seven persons, allow Jeffrey P. Jacobs to appoint four
persons to the Board, submit a staggered Board proposal to
shareholders at the next annual meeting and appoint Mr. Jacobs as Co-
Chairman of the Board (with Mr. Greenlee) and elect Mr. Jacobs as
Black Hawk's Chief Executive Officer. The agreement also provided for
customary buy-sell rights and rights of first refusal as to Black Hawk
shares among Black Hawk, Diversified, Mr. Greenlee and Mr. Day;
. a master joint venture agreement that obligated each of Black Hawk and
Diversified to offer to a joint venture to be formed by them any
gaming opportunity coming to its attention, with Black Hawk having the
right to own 51% or more of each joint venture and Diversified having
the right to own up to 49% of each joint venture, which agreement was
later amended to remove any obligation of Black Hawk to offer any part
of its opportunities to Diversified; and
. agreements relating to the ultimate formation, operation and
management of The Lodge Casino. Under these agreements, Black Hawk
owns a 75% interest in The Lodge and Diversified owns the remaining
25% interest. Black Hawk and Diversified share a management fee on a
50-50 basis. These arrangements are more fully described in Black
Hawk's Annual Report on Form 10-K included with this proxy statement.
In spite of Black Hawk's profitable operating performance since the date of
these agreements, the price of its common stock in the trading market, the
volume of stock trading activity and its institutional and research following
have all been unsatisfactory, in the view of Black Hawk's management and Board
of Directors. Many shareholders have also expressed these concerns to Black
Hawk's management. Generally, all the broad stock price indices have
outperformed Black Hawk's stock in the aggregate over the last five years. In
absolute terms, however, Black Hawk's stock has had a high sales price of $9 and
a low sales price of $5 in the last three years. The $12 per share proposed
price in the Merger Agreement is a substantial premium over these prices, the
price one day before the Jacobs' proposal was announced, and the various average
and other prices for Black Hawk's common stock described in detail below under
"--Recommendations of the Special Committee and Board of Directors; Fairness of
the Merger" and "--Buyers' Position as to Fairness of the Merger to Unaffiliated
Shareholders."
Mr. Greenlee resigned all of his positions with Black Hawk in 1998 but
retained his significant shareholdings. In the spring and summer of 2000, Mr.
Greenlee initiated communications with Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Chairman of Black
Hawk, urging that Black Hawk create a "liquidity event" in order that
shareholders might have the opportunity to realize the value of their shares,
which Mr. Greenlee felt were undervalued in the marketplace. In early August
2000, Mr. Jacobs contacted Mr. Greenlee to discuss purchasing Mr. Greenlee's and
Mr. Day's stock at $12 per share with extended closing dates of six months and
nine months and subject to other conditions. The discussions did not result in
an agreement or further negotiations. On August 29, 2000, Mr. Greenlee called
Mr. Jacobs and requested an opportunity to address the Board of Directors to
discuss possible means of maximizing and realizing shareholder value. On
September 8, 2000, Mr. Jacobs notified Mr. Greenlee that he was welcome to
address the Board at its next regularly scheduled meeting on September 29, 2000.
15
At the Board meeting held on September 29, 2000, Mr. Greenlee by telephonic
connection stated that he believed Black Hawk's shares to be significantly
undervalued in the marketplace. He based this on preliminary observations of
his investment banking firm although it did not have enough information to do a
comprehensive analysis. Mr. Greenlee further stated that in spite of Black
Hawk's strong operating performance and financial condition, it was unlikely
that Black Hawk's stock price would reflect its intrinsic value at any time in
the foreseeable future because of the low number of shares being publicly
traded, Black Hawk's small market capitalization and its lack of any significant
institutional or research interest. Mr. Greenlee suggested that Black Hawk hire
an investment banker to explore ways to create a liquidity event for
shareholders, including the possible sale of Black Hawk.
Following Mr. Greenlee's presentation, Mr. Jacobs informed the Board that
he had been considering making an offer to acquire all of the shares of Black
Hawk which he did not already own, but that his financial advisors had
indicated to him that it would be difficult at that time to arrange financing on
acceptable terms.
At the September 29, 2000 meeting, the Board considered conducting a self
tender offer for some of its shares to provide some liquidity to shareholders.
The Board instructed management to undertake an analysis of taking that action,
including the possible effects on the market, whether a self tender would
jeopardize Black Hawk's Nasdaq listing because of reduced public float and
whether a self tender would be feasible because it could only be financed with
advances from Black Hawk's revolving credit facility, not from cash reserves as
is usually the source of funding.
At a Board meeting held on October 20, 2000, the Board determined that the
self tender proposal might not be feasible in light of the considerations set
forth above and because only a relatively small amount of liquidity could be
provided. The Board decided that an investment banking firm should be engaged
to review strategic alternatives available to Black Hawk, including continuing
to pursue its business plan as an independent public company, conducting a
version of a self tender offer, or possibly undertaking an outright sale of
Black Hawk.
Mr. Jacobs suggested that Black Hawk consider engaging McDonald
Investments, Inc., a full service investment banking firm and a subsidiary of
Key Corp, a large bank-based financial services company. Mr. Jacobs disclosed
to the Board that McDonald had advised on other transactions in which Mr.
Jacobs' affiliates had been involved. On November 8, 2000, McDonald was engaged
to examine strategic alternatives available to Black Hawk and report to the
Board when its work was complete. Black Hawk issued a press release on that
date announcing McDonald's engagement. Because of McDonald's previous work for,
and relationships with, affiliates of Mr. Jacobs and the Buyers, however,
McDonald's services were terminated after Mr. Jacobs made his proposal at the
February 26, 2001 meeting of the Board discussed below.
In a letter dated December 19, 2000, as supplemented by a letter dated
January 11, 2001, Mr. Greenlee demanded a shareholders' list from Black Hawk and
stated that he intended to offer his own slate of three nominees for election to
Black Hawk's Board at its annual meeting of shareholders in 2001. On January 4,
2001, Mr. Greenlee further demanded that a resolution and supporting statement
be included in Black Hawk's proxy statement for its next annual meeting of
shareholders. Mr. Greenlee's proposal, which he acknowledged would not be
binding on Black Hawk or the Board even if it were adopted, read as follows:
"To consider and vote upon a shareholder proposal to arrange for the prompt sale
of the Company [Black Hawk] to the highest bidder." See "Shareholder
Proposals."
At a meeting of the Board held on February 26, 2001, at which McDonald
Investments had given a preliminary presentation of the strategic alternatives
available to Black Hawk, Mr. Jacobs presented a term sheet to the Board pursuant
to which he offered to purchase all Black Hawk shares not owned by him for $11
cash per share. Mr. Jacobs stated that he had engaged U.S. Bancorp Libra, an
investment banking and advisory firm, to assist him in formulating the offer and
to determine the feasibility of financing the acquisition in the high yield debt
market which had improved substantially in early 2001. The February 26, 2001
meeting was the first time Black Hawk's directors, other than Mr. Jacobs, heard
of Mr. Jacobs' second consideration of a proposal to take Black Hawk private.
The term sheet presented by Mr. Jacobs at that meeting contained terms later
embodied in the Merger Agreement, except for the $12 per share price, the $1
million break-up fee, the highly confident letter rather than a "financing out"
provision, and the $2 million liquidated damages provision, as such were later
negotiated by the Special Committee and Mr. Jacobs. See "The Merger Agreement."
16
The Board determined that because Mr. Jacobs' offer appeared to be sincere
and credible, it was worth pursuing. It further determined that in view of the
possible conflicts of interest attendant to any buy-out proposal from an
affiliate, it was advisable to form a special committee of independent members
of the Board (the "Special Committee"). The Special Committee was formed and
consists of J. Patrick McDuff, Chairman, and members Frank B. Day and Timothy
Knudsen. Even though Mr. Day owns approximately 12% of Black Hawk's common
stock, the Board believes Mr. Day to be entirely independent from Mr. Jacobs in
connection with the proposed merger and that his interests as a substantial
shareholder are aligned with those of unaffiliated shareholders. The Special
Committee was authorized by the Board to entertain, analyze, negotiate and
recommend (or recommend against) Mr. Jacobs' offer and to consider other
alternatives with a view to maximizing Black Hawk's shareholder value. The
Special Committee was also authorized to engage a financial advisory or
investment banking firm and legal counsel to advise and assist it. The Special
Committee began work immediately and conducted interviews with two large Denver,
Colorado law firms, selecting Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP to represent it.
Black Hawk issued a press release on February 27, 2001 announcing Mr.
Jacobs' offer of $11 per share. Mr. Jacobs' offer was subject to various
conditions, including the negotiation and execution of definitive agreements,
approval by Black Hawk's Board of Directors and shareholders, the obtaining of
various regulatory approvals, and Mr. Jacobs' ability to obtain financing
necessary for the transaction. Mr. Jacobs' offer did not propose a termination
fee in the event Black Hawk resolved to accept a superior proposal, although his
offer indicated that he was interested in including such a termination fee in
the definitive agreement, if any.
Later in the day on February 27, 2001, a lawsuit captioned Joseph Brecher
v. Timothy Knudsen, Robert H. Hughes, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Stephen R. Roark, J.
Patrick McDuff, Frank B. Day and Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc.,
Case No, 01CV13, was filed in the Colorado District Court, Gilpin County,
Colorado. On March 1, 2001, another purported class action lawsuit was filed in
the Colorado District Court, County of Gilpin, under the caption Mary Bonsall v.
Black Hawk Gaming & Development Co. [sic], Inc.; Jeffrey P. Jacobs; Stephen R.
Roark; Frank B. Day; J. Patrick McDuff; Robert H. Hughes; Timothy Knudsen; and
Stephen P. Owendoff, Case No. 01-CV-16. The allegations in both actions are
essentially the same: that the price offered by the Buyers is grossly unfair,
that Black Hawk does not have in place an adequate process to achieve the
highest price attainable for its shareholders and that the Board is breaching
its fiduciary duties. The actions seek to enjoin the merger, rescind it if it
is consummated and recover unspecified damages, legal fees and costs. See
"Certain Litigation" for a discussion of both actions.
During the period from March 1, 2001, to March 12, 2001, the Special
Committee contacted and interviewed seven financial advisory and investment
banking firms, including McDonald. McDonald was eliminated from the process
after its interview, in part, because the Special Committee believed that
McDonald's previous work for, and relationships with, affiliates of the Buyers
arguably created at least the appearance of a lack of independence. During its
deliberations and review discussed below, the Special Committee and its advisors
reviewed and discussed the McDonald draft, but, the Special Committee did not
consider it material or relevant, did not give significant consideration to the
conclusions reached by McDonald in that draft and did not use that analysis as
part of its deliberations concerning the fairness of the transaction, from a
financial point of view. The Special Committee adopted this approach because of
the draft nature of the McDonald presentation, McDonald's apparent lack of
independence, and the time elapsed between the February McDonald presentation
and the April Robertson Stephens presentation. See "McDonald Investments
Report".
On Monday, March 12, 2001, after much discussion about the relative merits
of the firms that the Special Committee thought were qualified to serve as its
financial advisor, the Special Committee selected Robertson Stephens to serve as
the financial advisor to the Special Committee, and to advise the Special
Committee in connection with Black Hawk's exploration of strategic alternatives
available to it, including a sale or possible business combination.
A Board of Directors meeting was held on March 13, 2001, at which the
directors were apprised of the lawsuits described above and Black Hawk's
proposed responses and defenses. The Special Committee reported on the
background and selection of its financial advisor and legal counsel as more
fully described above. Mr. Jacobs informed the Board that Mr. Greenlee had
called him on March 10, 2001 and indicated that he was considering making a
competing offer. The Special Committee expressed concern about the financing
condition in Mr. Jacobs'
17
offer. A representative of U.S. Bancorp Libra was present by invitation at the
meeting and stated that Libra could provide a letter to the effect that Libra at
that time was "highly confident" that suitable financing could be obtained to
complete the proposed Merger.
From March 15, 2001 to March 20, 2001, Robertson Stephens conducted
preliminary due diligence, including but not limited to visiting the properties
owned by the company in Black Hawk, Colorado, touring competitive sites in the
Black Hawk area, and meeting with Black Hawk management. At the request of the
Special Committee, Robertson Stephens also initiated contacts with a number of
companies to determine if any of those companies might have an interest in a
transaction with Black Hawk.
During the period March 21 to April 5, 2001, the Special Committee and its
representatives conducted negotiations with the Buyers over the terms of the
proposed Merger Agreement. On March 21, 2001 and April 5, 2001, the Special
Committee met with its financial and legal advisors for the purposes of, among
other things, reviewing the status of the negotiations with the Buyers and the
interest of other prospective bidders.
The Board of Directors held a meeting on April 5, 2001 at which the Special
Committee advised the Board of its activities to date. Mr. McDuff, Chairman of
the Special Committee, informed the Board that Robertson Stephens, the Special
Committee's financial advisor, had identified 26 companies and persons which
might have an interest in a transaction with Black Hawk and had actively
attempted to initiate contact with each of them, offering an executive summary
prepared by Robertson Stephens and Black Hawk which contained relevant, publicly
available financial and other information concerning Black Hawk. Six of these
companies and persons requested the executive summary.
On April 9, 2001, the Special Committee received an oral report from
Robertson Stephens. In this report, Robertson Stephens discussed with the
Special Committee the prospects for maintaining the current ownership and
publicly traded status of Black Hawk, the prospects for alternative
transactions, the status of negotiations with the Buyers, the interaction with
other potential bidders including Mr. Greenlee, and the progress in improving
both the terms and price of the transaction proposed by the Buyers. Robertson
Stephens also discussed with the Special Committee its proposed methodologies
for valuing Black Hawk and the preliminary results of such methodologies. These
results did not differ materially from the analyses presented to the Special
Committee on April 23, 2001, which are described below under "--Opinion of
Financial Advisor to the Special Committee."
On April 10, 2001, Mr. Greenlee informed the Special Committee that, based
on his preliminary analysis, he was prepared to offer $12 per share for shares
other than those held by him and members of any participating group that he
might form. He further stated that any transaction would be subject to various
conditions including completion of due diligence and his ability to obtain
financing necessary for the transaction.
On April 13, 2001 and April 17, 2001, the Special Committee met with its
legal and financial advisors to discuss the status of the proposal from the
Buyers and Mr. Greenlee's indication of interest and to determine a course of
action with respect to the competing alternatives. The Special Committee
discussed, among other things, the differences between the two proposals,
including the differences in price, financing, feasibility and terms, and
potential regulatory approvals. The Special Committee also discussed the status
of communications with other parties that had requested the executive summary.
After much discussion, the Special Committee concluded that, based on the
communications with other potential bidders and the lack of any offers from
those other entities, the Buyers' and Mr. Greenlee's proposals were the most
credible and fully developed and were deserving of the most attention by the
Special Committee and its advisors, by virtue of the greater likelihood of
leading to an outcome that would be advisable for Black Hawk and fair to Black
Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders. The Special Committee, however, concluded
that it was still interested in pursuing other communications and considering
any additional offers that might be made.
The Special Committee and its advisors continued to negotiate with Mr.
Jacobs and the Buyers over the merger consideration and the other terms of the
transaction, including the size of the termination fee and the strength of the
Buyer's financing. On April 13, 2001, at the direction of the Special
Committee, the advisors to the Special Committee contacted the advisors to the
Buyers and suggested a $12 per share merger consideration, coupled with a $1
million termination fee and no "financing out" for the Buyers. The Buyers
offered $11.50 per share, coupled with a $1 million termination fee and no
"financing out" for the Buyers.
18
At a Board meeting held on April 17, 2001, the Special Committee advised
the Board of its activities to date. Mr. McDuff stated that the Special
Committee had held a meeting earlier in the day with Robertson Stephens and the
Special Committee's legal counsel to discuss the continuing negotiations with
Mr. Jacobs' counsel and to report that, in addition to Mr. Greenlee, two other
parties had signed confidentiality agreements and had requested due diligence
materials, but had not submitted offers for Black Hawk or otherwise indicated an
interest in pursuing a transaction with Black Hawk.
On April 17, 2001, at the direction of the Special Committee, the advisors
to the Special Committee contacted the advisors to the Buyers and suggested an
$11.75 per share merger consideration, coupled with a highly confident letter
from a reputable investment bank as to the Buyer's ability to raise the
financing necessary to consummate the transaction and a payment of $5 million if
the Buyers failed to consummate the Merger. The Buyers offered $11.75 per share
merger consideration, coupled with a "highly confident letter," but were
unwilling to agree to the termination payment of $5 million.
Later that day, Mr. Day, acting on behalf of the Special Committee, spoke
separately to Mr. Jacobs and Mr. Greenlee about their respective proposals.
During these discussions, Mr. Greenlee indicated that he would be willing to
enter into a voting agreement with the Buyers to vote in favor the merger
proposed by the Buyers if, among other things, the Buyers increased their offer
to $12 per share. Mr. Jacobs indicated that the Buyers would be willing to
increase their offer to $12 per share if Mr. Greenlee were willing to enter into
a voting agreement to vote in favor of the Merger proposed by the Buyers and the
proposed termination fee were reduced to $2 million, supported by a letter of
credit. With respect to the voting agreement, Mr. Jacobs' primary concern was
to ensure that Mr. Greenlee would vote all of his Black Hawk shares in favor of
the Merger and would not pursue or support a competing transaction. Mr.
Greenlee's primary concerns were to ensure that the Merger consideration would
not be less than $12 per share in cash and that the Merger would be consummated
within a reasonable period of time.
On April 18, 2001, Mr. Day informed the Special Committee about his
discussions with Mr. Jacobs and Mr. Greenlee. The Special Committee believed
that, assuming the Buyers and Mr. Greenlee could reach an agreement on that
voting agreement (which was ultimately executed on April 27, 2001), the Merger
Agreement proposed by the Buyers, as revised through negotiations with the
Special Committee, represented an offer that was advisable for Black Hawk, fair
to Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders, and suitable for being recommended to
the Board. Based on this view, the Chairman of the Special Committee informed
Black Hawk that the Special Committee intended to meet with Robertson Stephens
and the Special Committee's legal counsel on the morning of April 23, 2001 and
requested that a full Board meeting be called as soon thereafter as feasible.
On April 23, 2001, the Special Committee met telephonically with Mr. Day
and Mr. Knudsen participating. Mr. McDuff was unable to participate because of
technical problems with international telephone communications. The Special
Committee's legal and financial advisors provided the Special Committee with an
update on the status of the negotiations with the Buyers and Mr. Greenlee, and
Mr. Greenlee's decision to forego pursuit of his offer in favor of supporting
the Buyers' offer. Immediately after the conclusion of the telephonic meeting,
Mr. McDuff was able to reach counsel to the Special Committee. Counsel reviewed
for Mr. McDuff the discussions, determinations, approvals, and recommendations
that occurred during the meeting. Mr. McDuff informed counsel that he concurred
in all of the actions taken by the Special Committee and requested that the
minutes reflect his concurrence.
Robertson Stephens delivered to the Special Committee its oral opinion,
subsequently confirmed in a written opinion dated as of April 23, 2001, that as
of that date and based on the assumptions made, matters considered and the
limitations on the review undertaken as described in the written opinion, the
$12 per share merger consideration was fair from a financial point of view to
the unaffiliated shareholders of Black Hawk. The opinion was premised on the
material terms of the April 20, 2001 draft of the Merger Agreement which were
not altered by the subsequent changes in the Merger Agreement.
The Special Committee also reviewed the process by which the Buyers' offer,
initially made at $11 per share, was improved over the course of the
negotiations with the Buyers, from $11 to $11.50, from $11.50 to $11.75, and
finally, from $11.75 to $12. The Special Committee also reviewed the negotiated
improvement in other terms of the proposed transaction, including covenants
relating to the Buyers' efforts to obtain financing and the ability of Black
Hawk to entertain offers that may arise subsequent to the execution of the
Merger Agreement.
19
After considering, among other things, these factors and the Robertson
Stephens oral opinion, the Special Committee determined that the merger of BH
Acquisition with and into Black Hawk, with Black Hawk as the surviving
corporation, was in the best interests of Black Hawk and its unaffiliated
shareholders and that the $12 per share merger consideration was fair to Black
Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders. The Special Committee approved the Merger
Agreement and recommended that the Board determine that the Merger is advisable
and in the best interests of Black Hawk and its unaffiliated shareholders and
that the merger consideration is fair to the unaffiliated shareholders. The
Special Committee also recommended that the Board approve the Merger Agreement
and determine to submit the Merger Agreement to Black Hawk's shareholders and
recommend that its shareholders vote to adopt the Merger Agreement.
The Board of Black Hawk held a meeting the afternoon of April 25, 2001. The
Special Committee discussed the information and oral opinion provided by
Robertson Stephens and the draft Merger Agreement with Gameco. The Special
Committee also reported that a total of 26 companies and persons (including Mr.
Greenlee) had been contacted by Robertson Stephens to inquire if they had an
interest in acquiring Black Hawk. The Special Committee reported earlier that
six parties had requested the executive summary and two (including Mr. Greenlee)
had signed confidentiality letters. The Special Committee and its counsel
addressed several inquiries from the Board of Directors concerning aspects of
the negotiations, the Merger Agreement and the Robertson Stephens' opinion. The
Board asked whether Robertson Stephens had contacted a broad range of potential
bidders, including competitors in the Black Hawk area. Robertson Stephens said
that it had, noting the contact with the 26 companies described above.
Moreover, it was mentioned that Mr. Jacobs' offer was well known in the gaming
industry but that it had prompted no other bidders. The Board confirmed with
Robertson Stephens that the possibility of competing bidders was remote.
Finally, the Board discussed with Robertson Stephens whether the $12 per share
offer from Mr. Jacobs (which was initially $11) was the highest and best that
could be negotiated and concluded that it was. Therefore, considering, among
other things, the recommendation of the Special Committee as more fully
discussed immediately below, the Board of Directors, with Mr. Jacobs abstaining
in light of his personal interest in the proposed transaction, determined that
the Merger and Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated therein were
advisable, fair to and in the best interests of Black Hawk's unaffiliated
shareholders.
In early July, Black Hawk filed a preliminary version of this proxy
statement. In July and August, the Buyers pursued high yield debt financing
with their investment bankers which included preparation of Rule 144A offering
documentation. After September 11, 2001, financing the merger transaction from
the high yield market no longer appeared feasible to the Buyers in the near
term. The Buyers immediately began to examine and discuss alternatives,
including financing alternatives. On October 26, 2001, Mr. Jacobs asked that a
meeting of the Special Committee be called. At a telephonic meeting held that
day, Mr. Jacobs requested that the December 31, 2001 outside date to complete
the Merger be extended by 90 days. He stated that the Buyers had consulted with
their financial advisors and had decided to renew their pursuit of financing in
the high yield market and, in parallel fashion, to also pursue commercial bank
financing but that more time would be needed. The Special Committee informed
Mr. Jacobs that it would confer with its financial advisors and legal counsel.
See "Special Factors--Financing of the Merger."
On November 9, 2001, Mr. Jacobs informed the Special Committee that
commercial bank financing did not appear to be feasible. However, during a
conference call on the same day with Mr. Jacobs and the Special Committee, the
Buyers' financial advisors stated that, in their opinion, the high yield debt
market had improved substantially since September 11, 2001 and that they were
highly confident that financing could be obtained for the transaction during the
first quarter of 2002. Mr. Jacobs again requested a 90 day extension of the
Merger Agreement.
The Special Committee considered the effects of the events of September 11,
2001, the fact that no competitive bids to acquire Black Hawk had come forward
despite the fact that the proposed merger and its terms were well known in the
industry; that the Buyers were still willing to pay $12 per share cash; that the
Buyers were willing to extend the letter of credit supporting the termination
fee to April 1, 2002; and that the Buyers' financial advisors were willing to
provide a letter that they were "highly confident" that high yield debt
financing could be obtained to complete the Merger in the first quarter of 2002.
The Special Committee unanimously recommended that Black Hawk's Board of
Directors approve an extension of the outside date for consummation of the
Merger to
20
April 1, 2002. On November 12, 2001 the Merger Agreement was amended to provide
for an outside closing date of April 1, 2002 with all other terms and conditions
remaining the same.
Recommendation of the Special Committee and Board of Directors; Fairness of the
Merger
Special Committee
Factors Supporting Decision to Approve the Merger.
In recommending approval of the Merger Agreement and the Merger to the full
Board of Directors on April 23, 2001 (as described above), the Special Committee
considered a number of factors. The material factors, both negative and
positive, are summarized below.
The material positive factors include:
. Market Price and Premium. The Special Committee considered the fact
that the Merger would provide Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders
with a premium for their shares compared to the market price of Black
Hawk's common stock because (1) the $12 per share to be received by
Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders in the Merger would exceed by
$3.50 (41%) the highest price per share of the Black Hawk common stock
as quoted by Nasdaq for the 24 months prior to February 26, 2001; and
(2) the $12 per share represented a 83% premium to the closing sales
price of the shares of common stock on February 23, 2001, the last day
the stock traded prior to the public announcement of Gameco's
proposal; and (3) a 79% premium to the average closing sales price for
the period between January 1, 1999 and February 23, 2001. The Special
Committee also considered the increase in price from under $7 per
share at the time the Board formed the Special Committee to just under
$10 as of April 20, 2001 as confirmation of the market's optimism
about the Merger;
. Advantage of Liquidity Given Public Company Limitations. The Special
Committee considered the limitations Black Hawk suffered and could
likely continue to suffer as a public company, including its limited
trading volume, lack of institutional sponsorship, low public float,
small market capitalization, and diminishing research attention from
analysts, all of which adversely affect the trading market for and the
value of Black Hawk common stock in view of the liquidity offered by
the Merger;
. Increasing Competition. The Special Committee considered the
increasing competition faced by The Lodge Casino and the Gilpin Hotel
Casino in Black Hawk, Colorado (including the two large casinos that
opened in Black Hawk in 2000, another large casino that is expected to
open in late 2001, and another large casino that is in the
predevelopment stage) and that such competition could potentially
erode Black Hawk's market share, making it a good time to consider
alternatives to maintaining and operating Black Hawk as a publicly
held company;
. Transaction Value in Excess of Public Company Value. The Special
Committee considered the risks and factors identified above which are
associated with remaining an independent public company and the
Special Committee's belief that the proposed transaction values Black
Hawk's cash flow generation more highly than would the public markets
for the foreseeable future;
. Results of Discussions with Other Potential Buyers. The Special
Committee believed that the length of time between the public
announcement of the Gameco proposal and the date of the Merger
Agreement provided a sufficient amount of time within which to gauge
the level of interest of other potential buyers in Black Hawk and to
permit other potential buyers, if any, to come forward. The Special
Committee also believed, based on the results of Robertson Stephens'
discussions with other parties who might have an interest in a
transaction with Black Hawk, that the prospects for a transaction
between Black Hawk and potential unaffiliated strategic or financial
third party buyers were limited due to Black Hawk's complex ownership
structure and management fees pertaining to The Lodge Casino, that it
would be difficult to attain value through
21
the divestiture of separate Black Hawk gaming properties, and that
there were limitations on the ability of a financial buyer to finance
a leveraged buyout of Black Hawk at a price materially above the price
offered by Gameco. Finally, the significant time and expense required
to obtain necessary approvals from both Colorado and Nevada gaming
authorities might constrain or greatly limit the interest of some
potential buyers;
. Presentations of the Financial Advisor. The Special Committee
considered the presentations of Robertson Stephens at various Special
Committee meetings and its final presentation at the April 23, 2001
meeting, including the oral and written opinion of Robertson Stephens
as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger
consideration to the unaffiliated shareholders of Black Hawk;
. Financial Condition and Operating Prospects. The Special Committee
considered its knowledge of Black Hawk's business, operations, assets,
financial condition, operating results and prospects, in light of the
premium offered under the terms of the Merger Agreement including the
lower fourth quarter earnings of Black Hawk in calendar year 2000
compared to the prior three quarters and to the same quarter in the
prior year as well as the similarity, from an operational and
financial perspective, of the recent acquisition of the well-
established and mature Gold Dust West Casino to the other Black Hawk
gaming properties, and determined that the merger consideration was
fair to the unaffiliated shareholders;
. Form of Merger Consideration. The Special Committee considered the
fact that the consideration to be received by Black Hawk's
shareholders in the Merger will consist entirely of cash, providing
shareholders with complete liquidity of their investment;
. Effect of Termination Fee. The Special Committee considered the $1
million termination fee payable to Gameco if the Merger Agreement is
terminated because of, among other things, the Board of Directors'
withdrawal or modification, in a manner adverse to Gameco, of its
recommendation of the Merger or its recommendation of an alternative
transaction, or its entry into a definitive agreement for an
alternative transaction, and determined that the termination fee
should not unduly discourage superior third-party offers;
. Activities of Mr. Greenlee. The Special Committee considered the fact
that Mr. Greenlee had agreed to enter into a voting agreement with
affiliates of Mr. Jacobs to vote his shares in favor of the Merger,
and had agreed to formally withdraw his offer to acquire Black Hawk
and that Mr. Greenlee's withdrawal left the Special Committee with one
offer to consider while making its deliberations.
. Absence of a Financing Contingency. The Special Committee considered
the fact that if the Buyers are unable to obtain the financing
necessary to complete the transaction, the Buyers do not have the
right to unilaterally terminate the Merger Agreement and that failure
to obtain that financing would entitle the Company to liquidated
damages of $2 million;
Factors Detracting From Decision to Approve the Merger.
The Special Committee also considered a variety of risks and other
potentially negative factors concerning the Merger. The material negative
factors consist of:
. Capitalization of Acquiring Entity. The Special Committee considered
that Black Hawk's only recourse in the event of a wrongful termination
or material breach of the Merger Agreement is against Gameco, a
company without assets; however, this risk is mitigated by the $2
million letter of credit provided by U.S. Bank National Association to
Black Hawk which Black Hawk may draw if Gameco wrongfully fails to
close the Merger;
22
. Limited Ability to Entertain Proposals From Other Potential Buyers.
The Special Committee considered the fact that the Merger Agreement,
which generally prohibits Black Hawk from entertaining any proposal
that would compete with the Merger, does permit Black Hawk to consider
an unsolicited acquisition proposal and to modify or withdraw its
recommendation of the Merger or recommend an alternative acquisition
proposal and terminate the Merger Agreement, if the Board determines
after consultation with its financial advisors that the alternative
proposal would be more favorable to the Black Hawk shareholders;
. Taxation of Merger Consideration. The Special Committee considered
that the cash consideration to be received by the Black Hawk
unaffiliated shareholders will be taxable to them;
. Loss of Equity Interest. The Special Committee considered the fact
that if the Merger is consummated, Black Hawk's unaffiliated
shareholders will not participate in the future growth of Black Hawk.
Because of the risks and uncertainties associated with Black Hawk's
future prospects, the Special Committee concluded that the Merger was
preferable to preserving for the holders of such stock a speculative
potential future return; and
. Interests of Certain Parties. The Special Committee also recognized
that the Buyers would have an opportunity, subject to the risks of
Black Hawk's business, to benefit from any increases in the value of
Black Hawk following the Merger. The Special Committee recognized that
this represented a conflict between the interests of the Buyers and
Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders. The Special Committee was
created in light of the conflicting interests of the Buyers.
Federal securities laws require disclosure of whether transaction
participants considered specified factors in evaluating a transaction such as
the Merger. For the reasons described below, the following factors were not
considered by the Special Committee:
. Relationship Between Merger Consideration and Liquidation / Net Book
Value. The Special Committee did not consider whether the merger
consideration offered to Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders
constitutes fair value in relation to the liquidation value or net
book value of Black Hawk, because these factors are not indicative of
the value of Black Hawk as a going concern; and
. Relationship Between Merger Consideration and Recent Acquisitions of
Black Hawk Stock. The Special Committee did not consider whether the
merger consideration offered to Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders
constitutes fair value in relation to the prices paid by Black Hawk or
any of the Buyers in connection with purchases of Black Hawk common
stock by any of such persons during the last two full fiscal years of
Black Hawk, because no purchases of such kind were made during that
period.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors discussed by the
Special Committee is not meant to be exhaustive, but includes all material
factors, both positive and negative, considered by the Special Committee to
support its decision to recommend the approval of the Merger Agreement and to
determine that the transactions contemplated thereby are in the best interests
of Black Hawk and fair to Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders. The Special
Committee did not assign relative weights or other quantifiable values to the
above factors; rather, the Special Committee viewed its position and
recommendations as being based on the totality of the information presented to
and considered by the members, and that on balance, the positive factors
discussed above outweighed the negative factors discussed above.
The Special Committee believes that the merger consideration is fair, in
part, based on the opinion of Robertson Stephens as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the proposed transaction. The analysis underlying
the Robertson Stephens opinion, which was expressly adopted by the Special
Committee, is summarized below.
23
The Special Committee also believes the process it followed in approving
the Merger Agreement was procedurally fair because:
. the Special Committee consists entirely of directors who are not Black
Hawk's officers or controlling shareholders or their family members;
. the members of the Special Committee will not personally benefit from
the consummation of the Merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement,
other than in their capacity as holders of Black Hawk common stock;
. the Special Committee retained independent legal and financial
advisors that assisted it in its evaluation of the options available
to Black Hawk; and
. the Special Committee negotiated, with the assistance of its advisors,
in good faith with the Buyers and the other potential buyers.
Board of Directors of Black Hawk
The Board formed the Special Committee to act solely on behalf of the
unaffiliated shareholders of Black Hawk for purposes of considering alternatives
to maximize shareholder value and analyzing and negotiating the Merger Agreement
and related matters. The Board appointed Frank B. Day, one of Black Hawk's
directors and second largest shareholder, to the Special Committee. Mr. Day has
held his investment in Black Hawk for approximately 10 years and the Black Hawk
investment is only a part of his various business holdings. The Board believes
that Mr. Day's interests are similar if not identical to unaffiliated Black Hawk
shareholders and that his services on the Special Committee have been and are
important to those shareholders. After formation of the Special Committee, it
retained Robertson Stephens as its financial advisor and Robertson Stephens
provided its opinion to the Special Committee as to the fairness from a
financial point of view of the merger consideration of $12 cash per share to
Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders as of April 23, 2001, subject to the
limitations, assumptions and qualifications stated therein.
The Board reviewed each of the factors presented by the Special Committee
as described above and considered the Special Committee's process and actions in
arriving at its recommendation to the Board. In reaching its determination, the
Board considered the Special Committee's determinations, recommendations,
unanimous approval of the Merger Agreement, and declaration of the Merger
Agreement's advisability. It also carefully considered the report and fairness
opinion delivered by Robertson Stephens to the Special Committee. The Board,
however, did not attempt to determine what weight should be given to each of the
factors described above. The Board gave little, if any, weight to Black Hawk's
net book value or liquidation value since it believes Black Hawk's value as a
going concern is greater and more relevant. The Board also disregarded the
preliminary work of McDonald Investments, Inc. dated February 26, 2001 because
it did not believe the work to be materially related to the proposed
transaction. First, McDonald's work occurred in December 2000 and January 1,
2001, prior to and therefore without regard to Mr. Jacobs' offer and at a time
when Black Hawk's year 2000 and first quarter 2001 operating results were not
available. Secondly, McDonald's work was very preliminary; it did not have the
opportunity to expand, modify or complete its analyses since it was not selected
to advise the Special Committee. For example, McDonald's preliminary work
downplayed the traditional comparable companies and comparable transaction
analyses as being "less relevant" and the discounted cash flow analysis as being
"especially relevant." The later report of Robertson Stephens, on which the
Special Committee relied, on the other hand, found numerous comparable companies
and comparable transactions and included them in their more customary analyses,
along with a discounted cash flow analysis and a premiums paid analysis.
McDonald has not consented to inclusion of its work in this proxy statement and
has advised Black Hawk, through counsel, that its work was only preliminary in
nature and of its belief that it is not related to nor material to the proposed
transaction and may be misleading to voting shareholders.
The Board was also aware that management had given over 50 face to face
presentations to brokerage and investment professionals over the past three
years. These efforts had produced no new market makers, research or
institutional following or any increased trading activity. Black Hawk's small
market capitalization and low public float were generally cited as factors
making its stock unattractive in the marketplace, factors not likely to change
in the Board's view, in the foreseeable future.
24
Black Hawk is undertaking the transaction with Gameco at this time as a
result of the Special Committee's consideration of the factors outlined above
relating to the limitations on Black Hawk's growth as a public company, its
recent financial performance, the potential impact of competition on its future
prospects, the long-standing concerns of the entire Board (including the members
of the Special Committee) regarding the continuing depressed price of Black
Hawk's common stock and because the $12 per share offered by Mr. Jacobs at this
time represents a substantial premium over the price of Black Hawk's stock in
the market at any time during the past three years. The Board also considered
the apparent lack of interest in Black Hawk at the present time, on the part of
third parties, including Mr. Greenlee, who withdrew his preliminary offer as
described above.
The Board believes that sufficient procedural safeguards to ensure fairness
of the transaction and to permit the Special Committee to effectively represent
the interests of the holders of Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders were
present, and therefore there was no need to retain any additional unaffiliated
representative to act on behalf of Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders or to
require the approval of at least a majority of Black Hawk's unaffiliated
shareholders. The Board reached this conclusion in view of:
. the independent status of the members of the Special Committee, whose
sole purpose was to represent the interests of Black Hawk's
unaffiliated shareholders;.
. retention by the Special Committee of independent financial advisors
and legal counsel;.
. the actions taken by the Special Committee in evaluating Black Hawk's
other alternatives and in negotiating the price and terms of the
proposed Merger with the Buyers and Mr. Jacobs as their
representatives; and.
. the fact that the Special Committee, even though consisting of
directors of Black Hawk and therefore not completely unaffiliated with
Black Hawk, is a mechanism well recognized under corporate law to
provide for fairness in transactions of this type.
The Merger Agreement was approved by the five members of Black Hawk's seven
member Board of Directors who are not employees. Neither Black Hawk nor the
Buyers have made any provision to grant Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders
access to their corporate files or to obtain counsel or appraisal services at
their expense.
The Board believes that the Merger is advisable and is fair to and in the
best interests of Black Hawk and its unaffiliated shareholders and, based upon
the analysis of the Special Committee and the opinion of the Special Committee's
financial advisor as set forth above (which the Board expressly adopts) and on
the unanimous recommendation of the Special Committee, recommends to Black
Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders that they vote FOR approval of the Merger
Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.
Buyers' Position as to Fairness of the Merger to Unaffiliated Shareholders
The SEC's rules require each of the Buyers to state whether it or he
believes the Merger is fair or unfair to Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders,
to indicate the extent, if any, to which that belief is based on specific
factors enumerated in the rules, and to specify, to the extent practicable, the
weight assigned to each such factor.
Each of Gameco, BH Acquisition, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Diversified, the Trust
and Richard E. Jacobs (collectively the "Buyers") believes that the Merger is
fair to Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders based on the factors supporting
its fairness set forth below, without having quantified or otherwise assigned
relative weights to those factors:
. The $12 per share merger consideration represents a premium of:
. 83% over the closing sales price of Black Hawk's common stock on
the last trading day before the public announcement of the
Buyers' proposal to acquire the entire equity interest in Black
Hawk; 82% over the average closing sales price of Black Hawk's
common stock on the Nasdaq during the 24 months ending on the
date of that announcement;
. 66% over the highest closing sales price of Black Hawk's common
stock on the Nasdaq in calendar 2000;
25
. 41% over the highest closing sales price of Black Hawk's common
stock on the Nasdaq in calendar 1999; and
. 57% over the average closing sales price of Black Hawk's common
stock on the Nasdaq during the three-year period ending on the
date of that announcement.
. The $12 per share merger consideration exceeds the per share net book
value of Black Hawk;
. The $12 per share merger consideration is at the top of the Buyers'
$10 to $12 per share range of estimates of Black Hawk's going concern
value, based on the Buyers' discounted cash flow analysis of the
prospective financial information of Black Hawk set forth herein under
"Prospective Financial Information of Black Hawk";
. Although Robertson Stephens' opinion is not addressed to the Buyers,
the Buyers are aware that Robertson Stephens has rendered its opinion
to the Special Committee that, based on and subject to the
limitations, assumptions and qualifications stated in its opinion, the
$12 per share merger consideration is fair, from a financial point of
view, to Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders. The Buyers believe
that the rendering of such an opinion by a firm of Robertson Stephens'
expertise and reputation supports the fairness of the Merger;
. Black Hawk's Board of Directors took effective steps to ensure the
procedural fairness of the Merger, including the formation of an
independent Special Committee to consider Black Hawk's alternatives
and negotiate solely on behalf of Black Hawk's unaffiliated
shareholders the price and terms of any transaction, the Special
Committee's retention of independent legal and financial advisors, and
the Special Committee's and its advisors' negotiations with the Buyers
and their advisors of the price and terms of the Merger Agreement; and
. The Special Committee and the Board of Directors have unanimously
determined the Merger to be advisable and in the best interests of
Black Hawk and fair to its unaffiliated shareholders (with abstention
from the Board's action only by Jeffrey P. Jacobs, in light of his
personal interests in the matter).
None of the Buyers considered Black Hawk's liquidation value as a factor
material to its or his evaluation of the fairness of the Merger to Black Hawk's
unaffiliated shareholders, because none of the Buyers believed that the sale of
Black Hawk's assets in a liquidation would produce net proceeds as high as Black
Hawk's going concern value.
None of the Buyers considered the purchase price of Black Hawk's common
stock purchased by any of the Buyers during the past two years, or firm offers
from any nonaffiliate of Black Hawk for a merger with, acquisition of assets
from, or purchase of a controlling equity interest in, Black Hawk during that
period as factors material to its or his evaluation of the fairness of the
Merger to Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders, because no such purchase
occurred and no such offer was made.
None of the Buyers considered the absence of a requirement that approval of
a majority of Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders be obtained in order to
effect the Merger as a factor detracting from the fairness of the Merger because
Black Hawk's Board of Directors implemented the effective procedural fairness
measures discussed above.
Benefits and Detriments of the Merger
To Black Hawk's Unaffiliated Shareholders
Black Hawk and the Buyers believe that the primary benefit of the Merger to
Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders is the realization of the value of their
investment in Black Hawk in cash at a price that represents a substantial
premium over current and historical market prices for the Black Hawk common
stock. In addition, the Merger will eliminate the risk to those shareholders of
a possible future decline in the market value of Black Hawk's common stock.
The primary detriment of the Merger to Black Hawk's unaffiliated
shareholders is that they will cease to participate in any future earnings
growth of Black Hawk and to benefit from any increase in Black Hawk's value. In
26
addition, each of Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders will recognize a
taxable gain on consummation of the Merger if and to the extent that the amount
of cash he, she or it receives in the Merger exceeds his, her or its tax basis
in his, her or its Black Hawk common stock. Further, the Buyers do not have a
binding commitment from a third party to provide funds necessary to complete the
Merger, if approved. Black Hawk is also committed to pay various fees and
expenses associated with the Merger and if it does not occur because the Buyers
cannot obtain financing, the $2 million liquidated damages fee they must pay to
Black Hawk may not fully compensate it for those expenses and diversions of
management time expended in the Merger effort.
To the Buyers and Black Hawk
The primary benefit to the Buyers of the Merger is that they will
participate in all of any future earnings growth of Black Hawk and will benefit
from all of any increase in Black Hawk's value. The Buyers believe that Black
Hawk will benefit from the Merger by gaining more operating flexibility, because
it will no longer need to focus on the public trading market's quarterly
earnings expectations, and by reducing its operating and administrative costs
because of a reduction in its public reporting obligations arising principally
from its equity securities being privately rather than publicly held after the
Merger.
The primary detriments of the Merger to the Buyers and Black Hawk are the
cash outlay and associated debt burden required to pay the merger consideration,
and diminution of Black Hawk's ability to use Black Hawk common stock as
currency for acquisitions, substantial capital-raising efforts and incentive
option purposes.
Opinion of Financial Advisor to the Special Committee
The Special Committee engaged Robertson Stephens to provide financial
advisory and investment banking services to the Special Committee in connection
with Black Hawk's exploration of various strategic alternatives available to it,
including a possible sale or business combination. Pursuant to its engagement,
Robertson Stephens rendered an opinion as to the fairness from a financial point
of view of the consideration to be received in the Merger by shareholders of
Black Hawk, other than Gameco, BH Acquisition, any other affiliates of the
Buyers and any members of management of Black Hawk who may receive an ownership
interest in Gameco (the shareholders, excluding such persons, being referred to
in the Robertson Stephens opinion as the "Shareholders of the Company"). See
Annex B for a copy of the full opinion.
On April 23, 2001, at a meeting of the Special Committee held to evaluate
the proposed merger, Robertson Stephens delivered to the Special Committee its
oral opinion, subsequently confirmed in a written opinion dated as of April 23,
2001, that as of that date and based on the assumptions made, matters considered
and the limitations on the review undertaken described in the written opinion,
the merger consideration to be paid in connection with the Merger was fair from
a financial point of view to the Shareholders of the Company.
You should consider the following when reading the discussion of the
opinion of Robertson Stephens in this document:
. We urge you to read carefully the entire opinion of Robertson
Stephens, which is set forth in Annex B to this proxy statement.
. The Robertson Stephens opinion was prepared for the information of the
Special Committee in connection with its evaluation of the Merger and
does not constitute a recommendation to the shareholders of Black Hawk
as to how they should vote, or take any other action, with respect to
the Merger.
. The Robertson Stephens opinion did not address the relative merits of
the Merger and the other business strategies that Black Hawk's Board
of Directors has considered or may be considering, nor does it address
the decision of the Special Committee or Black Hawk's Board to proceed
with the Merger.
27
The Robertson Stephens opinion was necessarily based upon market, economic
and other conditions that were in effect on, and information made available to
Robertson Stephens as of, the date of the opinion. You should understand that
subsequent developments may affect the conclusion expressed in the Robertson
Stephens opinion, and that Robertson Stephens disclaims any undertaking or
obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter affecting its
opinion which may come or be brought to Robertson Stephens' attention after the
date of its opinion.
. The Robertson Stephens opinion was limited to the fairness, from a
financial point of view and as of the date thereof, of the merger
consideration in the Merger to the Shareholders of the Company.
Opinion and Analysis of Robertson Stephens
In connection with the preparation of the Robertson Stephens opinion,
Robertson Stephens:
. reviewed certain publicly available financial statements and other
business and financial information of Black Hawk;
. reviewed certain internal financial statements and other financial and
operating data, including certain financial forecasts and projections,
concerning Black Hawk prepared by the management of Black Hawk;
. held discussions with the management of Black Hawk concerning the
businesses, past and current operations, financial condition and
future prospects of Black Hawk;
. reviewed the financial terms and conditions set forth in a draft,
dated April 20, 2001, of the Merger Agreement; reviewed the stock
price and trading history of Black Hawk common stock;
. compared the financial performance of Black Hawk with that of certain
other publicly traded gaming companies comparable with Black Hawk;
. compared the financial terms of the Merger with the financial terms,
to the extent publicly available, of other transactions that Robertson
Stephens deemed relevant;
. participated in discussions and negotiations among representatives of
Black Hawk, the Buyers and their financial and legal advisors;
. made such other studies and inquiries, and reviewed such other data,
as Robertson Stephens deemed relevant; and
. relied as to all legal matters relevant to rendering its opinion on
the advice of counsel.
In its review and analysis, and in arriving at its opinion, Robertson
Stephens assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the
financial and other information provided to it (including information furnished
to it orally or otherwise discussed with it by the management of Black Hawk) or
publicly available and neither attempted to verify, nor assumed responsibility
for verifying, any of such information. Robertson Stephens relied upon the
assurances of the management of Black Hawk that they were not aware of any facts
that would make such information inaccurate or misleading. Furthermore,
Robertson Stephens did not obtain or make, or assume any responsibility for
obtaining or making, any independent evaluation or appraisal of the properties,
assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Black Hawk, nor was it
furnished with any such evaluation or appraisal.
With respect to the financial forecasts and projections (and the
assumptions and bases therefor) for Black Hawk that Robertson Stephens reviewed,
Robertson Stephens has assumed that the forecasts and projections:
. were reasonably prepared in good faith on the basis of reasonable
assumptions;
28
. reflect the best currently available estimates and judgments as
to the future financial condition and performance of Black Hawk;
and
. would be realized in the amounts and in the time periods
currently estimated.
In addition, Robertson Stephens assumed that:
. the Merger will be consummated upon the terms set forth in the
draft of the Merger Agreement, dated April 20, 2001, without
material alteration thereof; and
. the historical financial statements of Black Hawk reviewed by
Robertson Stephens were prepared and fairly presented in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
consistently applied.
Robertson Stephens expressed no opinion as to:
. the value of any employment agreement or other arrangement
entered into in connection with the Merger; or
. any tax or other consequences that may result from the Merger.
The following is a summary of the material aspects of the financial
analyses performed by Robertson Stephens in connection with rendering its
opinion. The summary of the financial analyses is not a complete description of
all of the analyses performed by Robertson Stephens. Certain of the information
in this section is presented in tabular form. In order to better understand the
financial analyses performed by Robertson Stephens, these tables must be read
together with the text accompanying each table. The opinion is based upon the
totality of the various analyses performed by Robertson Stephens and no
particular portion of the analyses has any merit standing alone.
Comparable Companies Analysis
Using publicly available information, Robertson Stephens analyzed,
among other things, the trading multiples of the following small capitalization
regional operators in the gaming industry which Robertson Stephens believed to
be reasonably comparable to Black Hawk:
. Argosy Gaming Company . Ameristar Casinos, Inc.
. Aztar Corporation . Lakes Gaming, Inc.
. Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. . Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
. Boyd Gaming Corporation . Century Casinos, Inc.
. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. . Riviera Holdings Corporation
. Hollywood Casino Corporation . Sands Regent
. Penn National Gaming, Inc. . President Casinos, Inc.
29
The foregoing analysis indicated that recent market prices for common stock
of these companies represented price/earnings ratios and enterprise value
multiples as set forth below. In all cases, estimated 2001 and 2002 results of
operations for the comparable companies were obtained from generally available
third-party sources. In general, the enterprise value of a company is equal to
the value of its fully-diluted common equity plus debt, minus cash.
Enterprise Value/EBITDA Price/Earnings Ratio
2001 2002 2001 2002
---- ---- ---- ----
High 5.9 5.0 19.3 13.1
Low 4.4 4.2 5.4 5.7
Mean 5.1 4.6 10.3 8.6
Median 5.0 4.6 8.8 8.2
The following table shows the range of implied values per share of Black
Hawk common stock calculated by multiplying Black Hawk's projected EBITDA and
net income by ranges of multiples derived from the trading multiples of the
comparable companies identified above. In determining the ranges of trading
multiples, Robertson Stephens applied its experience and judgment to develop the
following multiple ranges after a review of each of the above named comparable
companies. However, these multiple ranges were not the results of any
mathematical calculation applied to these comparable companies. EBITDA means
earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization.
Multiple Ranges Implied Value per Share
--------------- -----------------------
2001 EBITDA 4.0x - 5..5x $6.67 - $13.80
2002 EBITDA 3.5x - 5.0x $4.75 - $12.07
2001 Net Income 8.0x - 10.0x $9.47 - $11.83
2002 Net Income 7.0x - 9.0x $8.04 - $10.34
The comparable companies analysis suggested a range of values of the Black
Hawk common stock from $4.75 per share to $13.80 per share, as compared to the
$12.00 per share cash consideration in the Merger.
Selected Precedent Transactions
Using publicly available information, Robertson Stephens reviewed and
analyzed, among other things, the consideration paid in the following selected
acquisition transactions in the gaming industry which Robertson Stephens
believed to be reasonably comparable to the Merger:
30
Date Date
Announced Target/Acquirer Announced Target/Acquirer
--------- --------------- ----------- ---------------
12/5/00 Fitzgerald Gaming 12/10/99 Hollywood Park (two
Corporation (three Casinos) Casinos) / Penn National
/ Majestic Investor, LLC Gaming, Inc.
10/18/00 Station Casinos, Inc. (two 10/6/99 Lady Luck Gaming
Casinos) / Ameristar Corporation / Isle of Capri
Casinos, Inc. Casinos, Inc.
7/31/00 CRC Holdings, Inc. / Penn 8/16/99 Players International, Inc.
National Gaming, Inc. / Harrah's Entertainment,
Inc.
7/20/00 Fiesta Casino Hotel / 11/1/99 Miss Marquette Casino /
Station Casinos, Inc. Lady Luck Gaming
Corporation
7/19/00 President Casinos 6/28/99 Blue Chip Casino, Inc. /
(Davenport, IA) / Isle of Boyd Gaming Corporation
Capri Casinos, Inc.
1/7/00 Gold Dust West Casino /
Black Hawk Gaming &
Development Company, Inc.
The foregoing analysis indicated that the consideration paid in the above
transactions represented the multiples of EBITDA for the latest 12 months (LTM)
and next 12 months (NTM) shown below. In all cases, estimated next 12 month
results of operations for the acquired companies were obtained from generally
available third-party sources.
Consideration as a Multiple of:
LTM EBITDA NTM EBITDA
---------- ----------
High 7.5x 5.6x
Low 4.1x 5.3x
Mean 5.4x 5.5x
Median 5.3x 5.5x
The following table sets forth the ranges of the implied Black Hawk prices
per share calculated by multiplying Black Hawk's EBITDA for the LTM and NTM by
ranges of multiples derived from the transactions referred to above and then
dividing by the number of fully-diluted Black Hawk shares outstanding using the
treasury stock method. In determining the ranges of trading multiples,
Robertson Stephens applied its experience and judgment to develop the following
multiple ranges after a review of each of the above described selected precedent
transactions. However, these multiple ranges were not the result of any
mathematical calculation applied to these selected precedent transactions.
31
Selected Precedent Implied Value
Transaction Multiple Ranges per Share
----------- --------------- ---------
LTM EBITDA 4.5x - 6.0x $10.83 - $18.56
NTM EBITDA 4.5x - 6.0x $ 9.05 - $16.18
The selected precedent transaction analysis suggested a range of values of
the Black Hawk common stock from $9.05 per share to $18.56 per share, as
compared to the $12.00 per share cash consideration in the Merger.
Premiums Paid Analysis
Using publicly available information, Robertson Stephens reviewed and
analyzed, among other things, the purchase price premiums paid for companies in
a number of recent transactions, including:
. the selected precedent transactions referred to above;
. 41 transactions of publicly held companies with announcement dates
subsequent to October 2000 and a transaction value of less than $100
million; and
. seven other going-private transactions since 1998.
In all cases, the purchase price premiums paid were based on the closing
market price for the acquired company one day and one month prior to the
announcement date of the transaction.
The following table sets forth the ranges of the implied Black Hawk prices
per share calculated by multiplying the closing market prices of Black Hawk
common stock on the dates indicated by the ranges of premiums determined from
the foregoing analyses.
Premiums Paid Analysis
Premium paid to stock 30% - 45% $9.10 - $10.15
price one month prior
to date of
announcement
Premium paid to stock 20% - 35% $7.88 - $8.86
price one day prior to
date of announcement
The premiums paid analysis suggested a range of values of the Black Hawk
common stock from $7.88 per share to $10.15 per share, as compared to the $12.00
per share cash consideration in the Merger.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Robertson Stephens performed a discounted cash flow analysis on the after-
tax free cash flows of Black Hawk for calendar years 2001 through 2005 using
estimates prepared by Black Hawk's management. Robertson Stephens first
discounted the estimated after-tax free cash flows through the calendar year
ending 2005 using discount rates of 12.0%, 13.5% and 15.0%. Robertson Stephens
then added to the present value of these after-tax free cash flows the terminal
value of Black Hawk in the calendar year ending 2005, discounted back to the
present at the same discount rates. The terminal values were computed by
multiplying estimated EBITDA for calendar year 2005 by exit EBITDA multiples of
5.0x, 5.5x and 6.0x. The range of exit EBITDA multiples selected reflects
Robertson Stephens' judgment as to an appropriate range of multiples at the end
of the referenced period. Applying the above discount rates and exit revenue
multiples to the after-tax free cash flows of Black Hawk yielded the following
ranges:
32
Implied Value Per Share
EBITDA Multiple 12.0% Discount Rate 13.5% Discount Rate 15.0% Discount Rate
- --------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
5.0x $10.58 $ 9.30 $ 8.12
5.5x $12.07 $10.70 $ 9.43
6.0x $13.56 $12.10 $10.74
The discounted cash flow analysis suggested a range of values of the Black
Hawk common stock from $8.12 per share to $13.56 per share, as compared to the
$12.00 per share cash consideration in the Merger.
Other Factors
Portions of the Robertson Stephens financial analyses incorporated
projections of Black Hawk's 2001 and 2002 adjusted EBITDA and 2001 and 2002 net
income that were provided by Black Hawk's management, with certain adjustments
made by Robertson Stephens. These projections are included in the projections
provided elsewhere in this proxy statement under the caption "Prospective
Financial Information of Black Hawk." In addition, the discounted cash flow
analysis prepared by Robertson Stephens incorporated information which was
derived from the projections of Black Hawk's management included under the
caption "Prospective Financial Information of Black Hawk." In preparing the
discounted cash flow analysis, Robertson Stephens made certain assumptions
regarding Black Hawk's projected tax rate, projected capital expenditures and
projected changes in working capital, which assumptions were based on Black
Hawk's historical experience.
No company, business or transaction referred to in any of the above
analyses is identical to Black Hawk or the Merger. Accordingly, consideration
of the analyses described above is not entirely mathematical. Rather it
involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in
financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the
public trading, acquisition and other values of the comparable companies,
precedent transactions or the business segment, company or transaction to which
they are being compared. In addition, various analyses performed by Robertson
Stephens incorporate projections prepared by research analysts using only
publicly available information. These estimates may or may not prove to be
accurate.
While this summary describes the analysis and factors that Robertson
Stephens deemed material in its presentation to the Black Hawk Special
Committee, it is not a comprehensive description of all analyses and factors
considered by Robertson Stephens. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a
complex process that involves various determinations as to the most appropriate
and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of these methods
to the particular circumstances. Therefore, a fairness opinion is not readily
susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. In arriving at its
opinion, Robertson Stephens did not attribute any particular weight to any
analysis or factor considered by it, but rather made qualitative judgments as to
the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor. Accordingly,
Robertson Stephens believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and
that selecting portions of its analyses and of the factors considered by it,
without considering all analyses and factors, could create a misleading or
incomplete view of the evaluation process underlying its opinion. Several
analytical methodologies were employed and no one method of analysis should be
regarded as critical to the overall conclusion reached by Robertson Stephens
Each analytical technique has inherent strengths and weaknesses, and the nature
of the available information may further affect the value of particular
techniques. The conclusion reached by Robertson Stephens is based on all
analyses and factors taken as a whole and also on application of Robertson
Stephens' own experience and judgment. This conclusion may involve significant
elements of subjective judgment and qualitative analysis. Robertson Stephens
expresses no opinion as to the value or merit standing alone of any one or more
parts of the analysis it performed. In performing its analyses, Robertson
Stephens made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general
business and other conditions and matters, many of which are beyond the control
of Black Hawk or Robertson Stephens. Any estimates contained in these analyses
are not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future results
or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those
suggested by these analyses Accordingly, analyses relating to the value of
businesses do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which
these businesses actually may be sold in the future, and these estimates are
inherently subject to uncertainty.
33
The engagement letter among Robertson Stephens, the Special Committee and
Black Hawk provides that, for its services, Robertson Stephens is entitled to
receive advisory fees of approximately $500,000 in connection with the
consummation of the transaction. In addition, Robertson Stephens was paid
$600,000 upon delivery of the fairness opinion, and with respect to the fee
payable upon delivery of the fairness opinion, such fee was paid without regard
to the conclusion reached in the opinion. The payment of Robertson Stephens'
advisory fees is contingent upon the consummation of the Merger. Black Hawk has
also agreed to reimburse Robertson Stephens for its reasonable and customary
out-of-pocket expenses related to this work, including legal fees, and to
indemnify and hold harmless Robertson Stephens and its affiliates and any other
person, director, employee or agent of Robertson Stephens or any of its
affiliates, or any person controlling Robertson Stephens or its affiliates, for
certain losses, claims, damages, expenses and liabilities relating to or arising
out of services provided by Robertson Stephens as financial advisor to Black
Hawk. The terms of the fee arrangement with Robertson Stephens, which Black Hawk
and Robertson Stephens believe are customary in transactions of this nature,
were negotiated between the Special Committee and Robertson Stephens, and the
Board of Directors was aware of these fee arrangements.
In the ordinary course of its business, Robertson Stephens may actively
trade securities of Black Hawk for its own account and for the account of its
customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in the
securities of Black Hawk.
Robertson Stephens is an internationally recognized investment banking firm
and was retained based on its experience as a financial advisor in connection
with mergers and acquisitions and in securities valuations generally. As part of
its investment banking business, Robertson Stephens is frequently engaged in the
valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of securities,
private placements and for other purposes.
The fairness opinion states that the opinion may not be summarized,
described or referred to or furnished to any party except with Robertson
Stephens' prior written consent. Robertson Stephens has consented to the
inclusion of this description and to the inclusion of it fairness opinion, dated
April 23, 2001, as an annex to this proxy statement.
McDonald Investments Report
At a meeting of Black Hawk's Board of Directors on February 26, 2001,
McDonald Investments, Inc. delivered a situational analysis of Black Hawk, a
valuation summary, and a discussion of strategic alternatives. This work was not
prepared in anticipation of or in support of the Gameco offer, nor is it a
report or fairness opinion on the Gameco proposal. During its deliberations and
review, the Special Committee and its advisors reviewed and discussed the
McDonald work, but, the Special Committee did not consider it material or
relevant, did not give significant consideration to the conclusions reached by
McDonald and did not use that analysis as part of its deliberations concerning
the fairness of the transaction, from a financial point of view. The Special
Committee adopted this approach because of the preliminary nature of the
McDonald presentation, McDonald's apparent lack of independence, and the time
elapsed between the February McDonald presentation and the April Robertson
Stephens presentation. The Board of Directors also disregarded the work of
McDonald for the reasons set forth above under "Special Factors--Recommendation
of the Special Committee and Board of Directors; Fairness of the Merger."
Nonetheless, the following information is included because it was available to
the Board of Directors of Black Hawk, the Special Committee, the Buyers and
their respective financial advisors and because of certain SEC rule
interpretations. Shareholders of Black Hawk may consider the following
information but McDonald has not authorized shareholders or any other person to
rely on any of the information.
Situational Perspective
McDonald noted that:
. Black Hawk has been largely ignored by the investing public and
institutional investors and has been "orphaned" by all research
sponsorship;
. Black Hawk is a micro cap stock which suffers from a lack of
liquidity, but by most valuation methods its stock is undervalued in
the marketplace;
. an acquisition strategy for Black Hawk will require additional equity,
which in turn requires a reasonable public market valuation to
implement;
. an attractive public company profile for Black Hawk will require
significant diversification outside the Colorado market; and
. the gaming district of Black Hawk, Colorado has become highly
competitive and a new Hyatt project brings more supply to the market
later in 2001.
Valuation Perspective
McDonald stated that although no valuation methodology can precisely
calculate a "value" for Black Hawk, in its view certain methods are more
relevant than others in Black Hawk's situation:
. comparable company values are less relevant because of a lack of
comparability;
. comparable transaction values are less relevant as a whole because of
a lack of comparability of the properties, market dynamics and scale
and scope of the companies involved in other transactions; and
. discounted cash flow analysis is always relevant, and in this instance
especially so because of the lack of comparable public companies.
McDonald stated that less tangible factors such as illiquidity, competitive
environment, Black Hawk's ownership of less than 100% of some of its assets and
the regulatory environment must be factored into any evaluation, although a
definitive standard does not exist for discounting for those factors. McDonald
concluded that assuming a consolidated EBITDA of $21 million net to Black Hawk
in 2001 and $23 million net to Black Hawk annually thereafter, as reflected in
projections provided by Black Hawk management, valuation parameters would put
Black Hawk between $10 and $15 per share, with the upper end of the valuation
range suggesting an interested strategic buyer.
McDonald's comparable company and comparable transaction analyses, both of
which it deems less relevant for the reasons stated above, and its discounted
cash flow analysis, yielded the following implied values per Black Hawk share:
Low Adjusted Average High
----- ---------------- ------
Comparable company $6.73 $12.81 $29.79
Comparable transaction 7.30 26.58 85.72
Discounted cash flow/(1)/ 3.96 10.13 17.84
- ------------------
(1) The terminal multiples used ranged from 4 to 6 and the discount rates from
10% to 20%. The adjusted average used above was derived from using a
terminal multiple of 5 and a discount rate of 15%.
Strategic Alternatives
McDonald stated that in evaluating strategic alternatives, the Board must
use its business judgment to accommodate multiple objectives, including:
. maximizing long-term shareholder value;
. maintaining a fair, objective arm's-length process;
. minimizing failed transaction risks; and
. protecting Black Hawk's competitive position in the near term.
McDonald suggested that the Board had two strategic alternatives to
consider for the benefit of Black Hawk's shareholders:
. maintain independence as a public company and
-- grow its business internally and through acquisitions without
making any immediate capital structure changes
-- consider repurchasing stock in the open market at a premium to
provide shareholder liquidity and perhaps improve valuation
. conduct market check (including possible sale or going private
transaction).
McDonald summarized the principal considerations in evaluating a decision
to remain independent and public:
Advantages Disadvantages
. Realize benefits of existing initiatives . Continuing structural deficiencies for
and growth prospects; shareholders retain small-cap issues
100% recovery in stock price . Lack of investor interest or credit for
. Maintain ability to fund small positive strategic initiatives
acquisitions over the next 1-2 years without . Public company expense/overhead
incremental equity capital because of . Shareholder desire for liquidity
existing borrowing capacity . Continuing lack of access to equity market
. Maintain public platform for acquisition . Limited geographic diversity
strategy . Very competitive market
. Management focuses on operating business . Capacity in Colorado market area increasing
as opposed to sale process (Hyatt, Jackpot Springs)
. Minimizes cost of equity in any future . Limited stakes market in Colorado
equity offering . Limited growth prospects
. Stable cash flow . Tight labor market
. Depressed valuation of stock . Uncertain financing capability for a future
. Prospect of buyout acquisition program
. Solid profitability . Poor public float
. Ownership by well capitalized groups . Complex ownership structure and management
. Dominance and growth of Black Hawk market fee
in Colorado . Threat of Indian gaming in N. California to
. Possibility of 24 hour gaming or higher Reno market
stakes . Possibility of improved access to Central
. Attractive recent acquisition in Reno City, Colorado
. Limited gaming risks because of betting . Regulatory risks
limits
Finally, McDonald noted some of the advantages and disadvantages of its
second suggested strategic alternative, to consider a merger or sale
transaction:
Advantages Disadvantages
. Shareholders receive highest immediate . Selling off at a depressed price
valuation . Future value may be much higher than
. Future operating risk eliminated from a comparative buyout price
shareholder perspective . Possibility of limited interest and an
. Exits a public market environment which is eventually unacceptable transaction price
not and may not for some time provide a fair . Potentially disruptive to company
valuation operations and employee morale; could lose
. Provides greatest amount of liquidity for management and employees to competition
shareholder base
. New structure or owner may create better
opportunity to incentivize employees
Prospective Financial Information of Black Hawk
Black Hawk does not as a matter of course make public forecasts as to
future operations, but Black Hawk did prepare prospective financial information
which it provided to Robertson Stephens in connection with its analysis of the
Gameco proposal and the financial evaluation of Black Hawk. The information set
forth below is included in this proxy statement solely because it was available
to the Buyers and provided by Black Hawk to Robertson Stephens in March 2001.
See "Special Factors--Background of the Merger" and "Special Factors--Opinion of
Financial Advisor to the Special Committee."
The information set forth below was not prepared by Black Hawk with a view
to public disclosure or compliance with published guidelines of the SEC or the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants regarding prospective
financial information, nor was the information prepared with the assistance of
or reviewed, complied or examined by, independent accountants. The information
reflects numerous assumptions, all made by management of Black Hawk, with
respect to competition, gaming industry performance, general business, economic,
gaming tax rates, market and financial conditions and other matters, all of
which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond Black Hawk's
control. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any assumption made in
preparing the information will prove accurate, and actual results may be
materially greater or less than those indicated below. The inclusion of this
information should not be regarded as an indication that Black Hawk or the
Buyers or any of their respective financial advisors or other representatives,
or their respective officers and directors, consider such information to be an
accurate prediction of future events or necessarily achievable. In light of the
uncertainties inherent in forward looking information of any kind, we caution
against reliance on such information. Unless required by federal securities
laws, Black Hawk does not intend to update, revise or correct such information
if it becomes inaccurate (even in the short term).
34
Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc.
Forecasted Consolidated Statements of Income
Years Ending December 31,
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(in thousands, except per share information)
Net revenues $105,777 $108,187 $108,187 $108,187 $108,187
Costs and expenses 95,030 95,674 94,858 94,626 94,226
Minority interest 1,772 1,785 1,863 1,903 1,953
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Pre-tax income 8,975 10,728 11,466 11,658 12,008
Provision for income taxes 3,321 3,969 4,242 4,314 4,443
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income $ 5,654 $ 6,759 $ 7,224 $ 7,344 $ 7,565
======== -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income per common share $ 1.34 $ 1.60 $ 1.72 $ 1.74 $ 1.80
======== -------- -------- -------- --------
Diluted weighted average
common shares outstanding 4,212 4,212 4,212 4,212 4,212
======== -------- -------- -------- --------
Consolidated Earnings
before Interest,
Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization
and Minority Interest
(EBITDA) $ 24,758 $ 26,570 $ 26,570 $ 26,570 $ 26,570
Less EBITDA attributable to
minority interest 3,609 3,609 3,609 3,609 3,609
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Adjusted EBITDA of Black
Hawk $ 21,149 $ 22,961 $ 22,961 $ 22,961 $ 22,961
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
The following is a list of assumptions used in the preparation of the above
prospective financial information.
. It is assumed that casino revenues are constant for all years 2001 and
beyond with the exception of the Gilpin Hotel Casino property. During
2001, it is assumed that the Gilpin property is under construction for
some of the year. Due to the enhancements at the Gilpin property after
construction, a 10% increase in revenues is assumed for the year 2002
with stable revenues for the remaining periods presented.
. The Gold Dust West Casino has been open for over 22 years and the
projections are based on historical performance for that property.
. Cash flow available from the operation of the casino properties is
used for on-going capital expenditures and debt reduction.
. Costs and expenses are assumed to remain flat. Interest expense is
adjusted for reduced debt levels. Income tax expense is computed based
upon an assumed combined federal and state income tax rate of 37%.
. EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
and minority interest) is presented as supplemental disclosure to
facilitate a more complete analysis of Black Hawk's forecasted
financial performance
. Minority interest represents the 25% share of The Lodge Casino that is
owned by the Buyers.
35
Buyers' Purpose and Reasons for the Merger
Each Buyer's purpose in undertaking the Merger is to obtain the benefits to
the Buyers and Black Hawk described under "Benefits and Detriments - To the
Buyers and Black Hawk." The Buyers chose the merger structure because it was
the most efficient means to acquire the entire equity interest in Black Hawk and
provide cash to Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders. In addition, the Buyers
believe that the U.S. gaming industry will continue to present profitable
financial opportunities, particularly for larger, more diverse gaming operators.
Each of the Buyers believes that consolidating all of the Black Hawk, Colonial
Holdings, Jalou and additional video gaming operations in Gameco will create a
diversified financial base of gaming holdings that should facilitate financing
for the competitive improvement and continued expansion of all of the Buyers'
gaming operations.
Jeffrey P. Jacobs also considered a tender offer by Black Hawk for its own
common stock and a purchase of large blocks of Black Hawk common stock held by
other shareholders, but rejected those alternatives in part because of the
difficulties attendant to obtaining financing for those transactions and in part
because neither of those alternatives would accomplish fully the purposes of the
Merger.
The Buyers have desired to undertake the Merger and the Colonial Holdings
and video gaming acquisitions since the late summer of 2000, for the reasons
referred to above, and chose to undertake the Merger at the time the Buyers'
proposal was initially made to Black Hawk because of their belief at the time,
based on consultations with their financial advisors, that high yield debt
financing would be available for the Merger.
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger; Certain Relationships
In considering the recommendation of the Special Committee and the Board
with respect to the Merger, you should be aware that certain members of the
Board and of Black Hawk's management have interests that may present actual or
potential conflicts of interest in connection with the Merger. The Special
Committee and the Board were aware of these potential or actual conflicts of
interest and considered them along with other matters described under "Special
Factors--Recommendation of the Special Committee and Board of Directors."
Retained Equity Interest
Jeffrey P. Jacobs, the Trust and Richard E. Jacobs beneficially own an
aggregate of 1,333,333 shares of common stock, representing approximately 32.1%
of the total outstanding shares of our common stock. Upon consummation of the
Merger, they will own directly or indirectly all of the outstanding common stock
of Black Hawk and will therefore participate in all of its future earnings
growth and any increase in value.
Shares and Stock Options
The value of Black Hawk stock and options held by members of the Board and
the Special Committee which will or may be realized upon consummation of the
Merger is as follows:
Name Number of Shares Value Number of Stock Options Net Option Value
- ---- ---------------- ----- ----------------------- ----------------
Jeffrey P. Jacobs 1,333,333 N/A 115,000 $ 695,200
Stephen R. Roark 28,571 $ 342,852 197,500 1,204,975
Frank B. Day(1) 497,211 5,966,532 -- --
J. Patrick McDuff(1) 1,830 21,960 13,250 84,403
Timothy Knudsen(1) 1,424 17,088 1,000 4,250
Robert H. Hughes 2,051 24,612 15,000 95,550
Stephen P. Owendoff 708 8,496 -- --
_________________
(1) Member of the Special Committee.
36
Directors and Management of the Surviving Corporation
After the Merger, Jeffrey P. Jacobs and Richard E. Jacobs will comprise the
Board of Directors of Black Hawk. Jeffrey P. Jacobs will continue to serve as
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Stephen R. Roark will continue to serve
as President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. See "Directors and
Management" for additional information.
Management Employment Agreements
Effective January 1, 2000, Black Hawk entered into three year employment
agreements with Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer and Stephen R. Roark,
President and Chief Financial Officer. Each agreement provides for severance
pay of one year's base salary if a 50% change in ownership of Black Hawk's
common stock occurs, unless the employee is a participant in the transaction or
unless the employee continues his employment with Black Hawk. Therefore, the
change of control provision will not apply to Mr. Jacobs and will apply to Mr.
Roark only if he is not offered, or declines, to continue his employment with
Black Hawk. In such event, Mr. Roark will be entitled to $250,000 in severance
pay. Mr. Roark presently intends to continue his employment with Black Hawk
after the Merger and Black Hawk intends to offer Mr. Roark the opportunity to so
continue. Mr. Jacobs receives an annual salary of the greater of $300,000 or
1.5% of Black Hawk's EBITDA and an annual bonus of between 25% and 40% of his
annual salary as determined by Black Hawk's compensation committee. Mr. Roark
receives an annual salary of the greater of $250,000 or 1.05% of EBITDA and a
bonus of between 25% and 40% of his annual salary as determined by Black Hawk's
compensation committee.
On November 22, 1999 Black Hawk entered into a three year employment
agreement with Stanley Politano, Vice President and Secretary, which provides
for an annual salary of $111,000, with $5,000 per year increases in years two
and three and an annual bonus in the discretion of the compensation committee.
Other Arrangements with Affiliates
The Lodge Casino is owned 75% by Black Hawk and 25% by BH Entertainment
Ltd., an Ohio limited liability company which Diversified, the Trust and an
entity solely owned and controlled by Jeffrey P. Jacobs own 98%, 1% and 1%,
respectively. Black Hawk and BH Entertainment share equally a management fee of
5% of adjusted gaming proceeds from The Lodge's operations. During the year
ended December 31, 2000, Diversified received $2,059,744 as its 25% share of the
profits from The Lodge Casino's operations and $1,453,473 as its share of the
management fee.
In order to assist Black Hawk in its efforts to research, develop, perform
due diligence on and possibly acquire new gaming opportunities, it entered into
a one year agreement with Premier One Development Company, Inc. effective
October 1, 1997. Premier is an affiliate of the Buyers and employs several
people to perform these services. Black Hawk paid or accrued $225,000 for these
services during the year ended December 31, 2000 and $168,750 through September
30, 2001. The agreement expires, unless extended on December 31, 2001.
Black Hawk and Diversified are parties to a master joint venture agreement
as discussed above under "Special Factors--Background of the Merger." In 1999
and 2000 Black Hawk and Diversified evaluated, among other opportunities, a
potential gaming development opportunity in D'Iberville, Mississippi. On August
21, 2000, Black Hawk and Diversified notified the landowners of the prospective
site that they had no further interest because of an adverse determination in an
environmental lawsuit affecting the site and because there did not appear to be
adequate site control from a development perspective. In April 2001
Diversified, through Jeffrey P. Jacobs, its manager, notified Black Hawk that it
might have a renewed interest in the site and offered Black Hawk the opportunity
to participate in any further evaluation of the site. The Board of Black Hawk
declined since it did not believe further expenditures on the site were
advisable. However, Diversified, again through Mr. Jacobs, volunteered and
Black Hawk accepted an option to acquire up to a 51% interest in the proposed
development at any time before April 18, 2002 by paying one-half of costs and
expenses incurred by Diversified in connection with any further evaluation of
the site. The interest available to Black Hawk will be reduced to 50% if, at
the time the option is exercised, Jeffrey P. Jacobs and his affiliates are not
controlling persons of Black Hawk, or if he is no longer Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Black Hawk for reasons other than his voluntary
resignation.
37
Directors and Officers Indemnification and Insurance
Gameco and Black Hawk have agreed to provide, or cause to be provided,
indemnification to each director, officer, employee and agent of Black Hawk
against any costs, expenses, losses, claims and damages arising out of or
relating to their activities on behalf of Black Hawk prior to or in connection
with the Merger. Gameco and Black Hawk have agreed not to amend, repeal or
otherwise modify the indemnification provisions of Black Hawk's articles of
incorporation or bylaws for a period of six years from completion of the Merger.
In addition, Gameco and Black Hawk have agreed to maintain in effect Black
Hawk's current directors' and officers' liability insurance policies for a
period of six years after completion of the Merger.
Certain Effects of the Merger
If the Merger is consummated, Black Hawk's unaffiliated shareholders will
no longer have any interest in, and will not be shareholders of, Black Hawk and,
therefore, will not benefit from any future earnings growth of Black Hawk or
from any increase in its value and will no longer bear the risk of any decrease
in its value. Instead, each unaffiliated shareholder will have the right to
receive upon consummation of the Merger $12 in cash for each share of common
stock he, she or it holds, without interest. The benefit of the transaction to
our unaffiliated shareholders is the payment of a premium, in cash, above the
market value for such stock prior to the announcement of the transaction. This
cash payment assures that all unaffiliated shareholders will receive the same
amount for their shares, rather than taking the risks associated with attempting
to sell their shares in the open market. The detriment to such holders is their
inability to participate as continuing shareholders in the possible future
growth of Black Hawk.
If the Merger is consummated, the Buyers will indirectly hold the entire
equity interest in Black Hawk and will therefore be the sole beneficiaries of
any future earnings growth of Black Hawk and any increases in Black Hawk's
value. However, the Buyers will bear the risk of any decrease in value of Black
Hawk and the risks associated with the significant amount of debt to be incurred
by Buyers in connection with the Merger and the lack of liquidity in the Buyers'
investment in Black Hawk. See "Special Factors--Benefits and Detriments of the
Merger" and "--Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger."
Black Hawk's common stock is currently registered under the Exchange Act,
and is traded on the Nasdaq National Market. As a result of the Merger, the
registration of the common stock under the Exchange Act will be terminated, and
the common stock will be delisted from Nasdaq. Black Hawk will thereafter be
relieved of its obligation to comply with the proxy rules of Regulation 14A
under Section 14 of the Exchange Act, and its officers, directors and beneficial
owners of more than 10% of the common stock will be relieved of the reporting
requirements and "short swing" trading provisions under Section 16 of the
Exchange Act. Further, Black Hawk will no longer be subject to periodic
reporting requirements under Section 13 of the Exchange Act and will cease
filing information with the SEC.
Plans for Black Hawk after the Merger
Each of Gameco and the Buyers expects that, except as described in this
proxy statement, the business and operations of Black Hawk will be continued
substantially as they are currently being conducted by Black Hawk and its
subsidiaries. However, Gameco expects that it may, from time to time, evaluate
and review Black Hawk's business, operations and properties and make such
changes as it considers appropriate. Gameco also intends to pursue gaming and
other acquisition opportunities, and Jeffrey P. Jacobs, the Trust and Richard E.
Jacobs may pursue gaming and other acquisition opportunities independently of
Gameco.
Except as described in this proxy statement, neither the Buyers nor Black
Hawk has any present plans or proposals involving Black Hawk or its subsidiaries
which relate to or would result in an extraordinary corporate transaction such
as a merger, reorganization, liquidation, sale or transfer of a material amount
of assets, or any material change in the present dividend policy, indebtedness
or capitalization, or any other material change in Black Hawk's corporate
structure or business. After the Merger, the Buyers will review proposals or
may propose the acquisition or disposition of assets or other changes in Black
Hawk's business, corporate structure, capitalization, management or dividend
policy which they consider to be in the best interests of Black Hawk and its
shareholders. Neither the Buyers nor Black Hawk has formulated any specific
plans regarding repayment of the indebtedness
38
incurred in connection with the Merger; however, such persons anticipate that
such indebtedness will be repaid primarily with or by means of cash flow and
dividends from the operations of the business of Black Hawk, and other Buyer
affiliated businesses, with proceeds from new debt or equity financings, or such
other means as they may determine in their sole discretion.
Conduct of the Business of the Company if the Merger is not Consummated
If the Merger is not consummated, the Board expects to seek to retain Black
Hawk's current management team and continue business as usual. There are no
plans in such circumstances to operate Black Hawk's business in a manner
substantially different than the manner in which it is presently operated.
Accounting Treatment
The Merger will be accounted for in accordance with the purchase method of
accounting under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Financing of the Merger
It is estimated that approximately $39 million will be required to complete
the Merger and pay related fees and expenses. See "-- Fees and Expenses." The
Buyers anticipate that financing for the Merger and additional activities of
Gameco may be provided by the proceeds of an offering by Gameco of up to $115
million of high-yield senior debt securities.
The Buyers expect that the proceeds of this financing would be used to:
. Finance the merger consideration payable to Black Hawk shareholders
(and to option holders whose options will be cancelled);
. Finance the merger consideration payable to Colonial Holdings
shareholders (and to option holders whose options will be cancelled);
. Finance the acquisition of up to six Louisiana-based truck plaza video
gaming operations and a revenue interest in a seventh such plaza; and
. Refinance approximately $60 million of the outstanding indebtedness of
Black Hawk.
The interest rate on the notes, and the other terms of the notes, will
depend on interest rate and market conditions at the time the notes are placed.
Interest rates are expected to range from 12% to 14% as of the date of this
proxy statement. It is anticipated that the notes will:
. Have a maturity of seven years from the issue date;
. Be secured by a lien on substantially all of the assets of Gameco and
its subsidiaries;
. Be senior in right of payment to all subordinated indebtedness of
Gameco and its subsidiaries;
. Be guaranteed on a senior basis by all of Gameco's subsidiaries;
. Be noncallable for four years, and thereafter callable at a redemption
premium to be determined; and
. Be subject to a mandatory offer by Gameco to purchase the outstanding
notes at 101% of their face amount, plus accrued interest, in the
event of certain changes in control.
39
The Buyers expect that the high-yield notes indenture will contain
customary covenants that will restrict, among other things, the ability of
Gameco and its subsidiaries to:
. Incur additional debt;
. Pay dividends or make some other restricted payments unless certain
liquidity tests are met;
. Incur liens;
. Apply net proceeds from some asset sales;
. Merge or consolidate with any other person, or sell, assign, transfer,
lease, convey or otherwise dispose of substantially all of the assets
of Gameco; and
. Enter into various transactions with affiliates.
The Buyers also expect that the high-yield notes indenture will contain
events of default that are customary in transactions of this type. The purchase
of the notes will be subject to customary conditions to closing.
Gameco has engaged CIBC World Markets and U.S. Bancorp Libra to act as co-
underwriters, co-placement agents or co-initial purchasers for the high-yield
notes. The Buyers expect that the high-yield notes will be issued in a
transaction that is not a public offering but that anticipates resales to
qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A of the Securities Act and
possibly to non-U.S. persons under Regulation S. Accordingly, the notes will
not be registered under the Securities Act on their original issuance, but they
will have registration rights.
Gameco received from CIBC World Markets a letter dated November 15, 2001
indicating that, based on market conditions existing at that time, the structure
and documentation for the Black Hawk acquisition, and subject to certain other
terms and conditions, CIBC World Markets was "highly confident" of its ability
to sell or place senior debt securities of Gameco in the aggregate principal
amount of up to $115 million. The letter is filed as an exhibit to the Schedule
13E-3 and is available at the principal executive offices of Black Hawk for
inspection and copying by any Black Hawk shareholder or representative of any
shareholder who has been so designated in writing. The placement and sale of the
senior debt securities under the highly confident letter is subject to
conditions precedent customary for financing of this type. The highly confident
letter does not constitute a commitment or an undertaking on the part of CIBC
World Markets to place or purchase the senior debt securities or provide any
portion of the financing. The receipt of the highly confident letter does not
ensure the successful placement or completion of an offering of senior debt
securities.
Gameco, CIBC World Markets and U.S. Bancorp Libra continue to monitor the
impact of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York City and
Washington, D.C., on the capital markets and the proposed high yield debt
offering. Those and ensuing events could have a materially negative impact on
the Buyers' ability to obtain financing for the Merger. There is no assurance
that the high yield debt financing will be available to the Buyers at all, or
available on terms and conditions acceptable to Buyers.
While high yield debt financing terms less favorable to Gameco than the
terms described above could adversely affect Gameco's interests, they would not
affect the consideration to be received by Black Hawk shareholders or the other
terms and conditions of the Merger. Gameco expects to repay the debt incurred
in connection with the Merger primarily from dividends from its subsidiaries. In
addition, Gameco may repay this debt with proceeds from new debt or equity
financings.
The Buyers have considered and will continue to consider alternative
financing arrangements if the primary financing plans fall through, but no
alternative financing arrangements have been finalized.
Regulatory Requirements; Third Party Consents
Black Hawk does not believe that any material federal or state regulatory
approvals, filings or notices are required by Black Hawk or Gameco in connection
with the Merger other than:
. such approvals, filings or notices required pursuant to federal and
state securities laws;
. approvals of the Colorado Gaming Commission and the Nevada Gaming
Commission, the status of which are discussed under "Gaming Approvals
and Delayed Closing"; and
. the filing of the articles of merger with the Secretary of State of
the State of Colorado.
40
Black Hawk's casinos' bars and restaurants are subject to licensing and
regulation by a number of governmental authorities regulating alcoholic
beverages. As a result of the Merger, Black Hawk also will be required to
satisfy various notification requirements imposed by state and municipal
licensing authorities in Black Hawk, Colorado and Reno, Nevada. Filing
requirements vary by agency. Subject to the timely submission of notices, which
Black Hawk intends to do prior to the Merger, Black Hawk will be duly licensed
and able to continue business as usual throughout the notification period,
Failure to appropriately and timely file notices could pose a risk of loss or
suspension of the affected license.
Black Hawk does not believe any other material third party consents will be
required by Black Hawk in connection with the Merger.
Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
The following discussion is a summary of the material federal income tax
consequences expected to result to shareholders whose shares of common stock are
converted to cash in the Merger. This summary does not purport to be a complete
analysis of all potential tax effects of the Merger. For example, the summary
does not consider the effect of any applicable state, local or foreign tax laws.
In addition, the summary does not address all aspects of federal income taxation
that may affect particular shareholders in light of their particular
circumstances and is not intended for shareholders (including insurance
companies, tax-exempt organizations, financial institutions or broker-dealers,
shareholders who hold their common stock as part of a hedge, straddle or
conversion transaction, shareholders who acquired their common stock pursuant to
the exercise of an employee stock option or otherwise as compensation, and
shareholders who are not citizens or residents of the United States or that are
foreign corporations, foreign partnerships or foreign estates or trusts as to
the United States) that may be subject to special federal income tax rules not
discussed below. The following summary also does not address tax consequences
to the Buyers. The following summary assumes that shareholders have held their
common stock as "capital assets" (generally, property held for investment) under
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
This summary is based on the current provisions of the Code, applicable
Treasury Regulations, judicial authority and administrative rulings and
practice. No ruling from the IRS has been or will be sought nor will an opinion
of counsel be obtained with respect to any aspect of the transactions described
herein. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge
the tax consequences expressed in this discussion or that a court would not
sustain this type of challenge. Future legislative, judicial or administrative
changes or interpretations could alter or modify the statements and conclusions
set forth herein, and any such changes or interpretations could be retroactive
and could affect the tax consequences of the Merger to shareholders. We cannot
predict at this time whether any current proposed tax legislation will be
enacted or, if enacted, whether any tax law changes contained therein would
affect the tax consequences of the Merger to shareholders. It is therefore
possible that the federal income tax treatment may differ from that described
below.
State and local tax laws may also impose income or other taxes upon
shareholders whose shares of common stock are converted to cash in the Merger.
State and local income tax laws vary from state to state and this discussion
does not address state or local tax issues.
Sales Treatment for Holders of Common Stock
Except as provided below, the conversion of common stock in the Merger will
be fully taxable to shareholders as a sale or exchange of such stock.
Accordingly, a shareholder who, pursuant to the Merger, converts such holder's
common stock into cash will recognize a gain or loss equal to the difference
between (1) the amount of cash received in the Merger and (2) such shareholder's
tax basis in the common stock. Generally, a shareholder's tax basis in his
common stock will be equal to such shareholder's cost therefor. In the case of
a shareholder who is an individual, such capital gain will be taxable at a
maximum capital gains rate of 20% if the holder held the common stock for more
than one year at the time of consummation of the Merger. If the holder held the
common stock for less than one year at the time of consummation of the Merger,
in general the capital gain would be taxed at ordinary income tax rates.
Certain limitations apply to the deductibility of capital losses by
shareholders. Gain or loss must be determined separately for each block of
common stock acquired at the same cost in a single transaction.
41
Redemption Treatment for Dissenters and Other Shareholders
For federal income tax purposes, Black Hawk may be deemed to be the source
of a portion of the cash consideration issued in the Merger (particularly if
debt used to fund the Merger is assumed by Black Hawk in the Merger) and Black
Hawk will be deemed to be the source of cash consideration for payments in
satisfaction of dissenters' rights. Therefore, to the extent that cash received
by a shareholder is from Black Hawk or deemed to be from Black Hawk, the receipt
of cash in exchange for such shareholder's common stock in the Merger or in
satisfaction of dissenters' rights will be treated as a redemption of common
stock taxable for federal income tax purposes as determined under section 302 of
the Code.
Section 302(d) of the Code provides that if the receipt of redemption
payments has the effect of a distribution of property, then cash distributed
will be treated as a dividend taxable under section 301 of the Code as ordinary
income to a shareholder receiving such cash payments, generally to the extent of
the shareholder's share of undistributed accumulated earnings and profits of the
company. The remainder, if any, will be treated first as a recovery of basis in
a shareholder's common stock, and second as capital gain arising from the sale
or exchange of property. The determination of whether or not the receipt of
cash payments has the effect of a distribution of a dividend will depend on each
shareholder's particular circumstances and is made by applying the dividend
equivalency tests of section 302 of the Code.
Under section 302 of the Code, a shareholder receiving a cash payment as a
redemption will not be treated as having received a dividend equivalent
distribution if the transaction:
. results in a "complete redemption" of the shareholder's equity
interest in the company;
. results in a "substantially disproportionate" redemption with respect
to the shareholder; or
. is "not essentially equivalent to a dividend" with respect to the
shareholder.
Each of these section 302 tests is explained more fully below.
Constructive Ownership of Stock and Other Issues
In applying each of the section 302 tests, shareholders must take into
account not only shares that they actually own but also shares they are treated
as owning under the constructive ownership rules of section 318 of the Code.
Pursuant to the constructive ownership rules, a shareholder is treated as owning
any shares that are owned, actually and in some cases constructively, by certain
related individuals and entities as well as shares that the shareholder has the
right to acquire by exercise of an option or by conversion or exchange of a
security. Due to the factual nature of the section 302 tests described below,
shareholders should consult their tax advisors to determine whether the
conversion of their shares and receipt of a payment pursuant to the Merger will
be deemed dividend equivalent in their particular circumstances.
Section 302 Tests
One of the following tests must be satisfied in order for the distribution
not to be treated as the equivalent of a dividend for federal income tax
purposes.
. Complete Termination Test. The distribution will result in a "complete
redemption" of the shareholder's equity interest in the company only
if all of the common stock that is actually owned by the shareholder
is sold pursuant to the Merger and the shares that are constructively
owned by the shareholder are sold or, with respect to shares owned by
certain related individuals, the shareholder effectively waives, in
accordance with section 302(c) of the Code, attribution of shares
which otherwise would be considered as constructively owned by the
shareholder. Certain restrictions apply to the waiver of attribution
of shares. Shareholders wishing to satisfy the "complete redemption"
test through waiver of the constructive ownership rules should consult
their tax advisors.
42
. Substantially Disproportionate Test. The distribution will result in a
"substantially disproportionate" redemption with respect to the
shareholder if, among other things, the shareholder owns actually and
constructively less than 50% of the total combined voting power of all
classes of stock after the redemption, and the percentage of the then
outstanding voting common stock actually and constructively owned by
the shareholder immediately after the purchase is less than 80% of the
percentage of the previously outstanding voting common stock actually
and constructively owned by the shareholder immediately before the
purchase.
. Not Essentially Equivalent to a Dividend Test. The distribution will
be treated as "not essentially equivalent to a dividend" if the
reduction in the shareholder's proportionate interest actually and
constructively owned constitutes a "meaningful reduction" given the
shareholder's particular circumstances. Whether the receipt of a cash
payment will be "not essentially equivalent to a dividend" will depend
upon the shareholder's particular facts and circumstances.
Shareholders should consult their tax advisors as to the application
of this test in their particular circumstances.
If a shareholder receives only cash payments and satisfies any of the
section 302 tests described above, the shareholder will be treated as if it sold
its common stock and will recognize capital gain or loss as described above.
If a shareholder does not satisfy any of the section 302 tests described
above, the purchase of a shareholder's common stock will not be treated as a
sale or exchange under section 302 of the Code. Instead, the amount received by
a shareholder in the redemption will be treated as a dividend distribution under
section 301 of the Code, taxable at ordinary income tax rates, to the extent,
first, of the shareholder's applicable share of Black Hawk's current earnings
and profits, as defined for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and, second, of
the U.S. shareholder's applicable share of Black Hawk's current earnings and
profits, as defined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. To the extent the
amount exceeds the shareholder's applicable share of current and accumulated
earnings and profits, the excess first will be treated as a tax free return of
capital to the extent of the shareholder's basis in its common stock and any
remainder will be treated as capital gain, which may be long term capital gain
as described above. The determination of whether a corporation has earnings and
profits is complex and the legal standards to be applied are subject to
uncertainties and ambiguities. Additionally, the amount of current earnings and
profits can be determined only at the end of the taxable year. Accordingly, it
is unclear whether Black Hawk will have sufficient current and accumulated
earnings and profits to cover the amount of any payment made to shareholders.
To the extent that a redemption is treated as the receipt by the shareholder of
a dividend, the shareholder's tax basis in the redeemed shares will be added to
any shares of common stock retained or sold by the shareholder, and may be lost
if the shareholder does not actually retain any stock ownership in Black Hawk.
Treatment of Holders of Stock Options
The payments received by holders of stock options granted pursuant to Black
Hawk's incentive stock option plans will be taxed as compensation income taxable
at ordinary income tax rates. Such income may be subject to withholding for
holders of stock options that are employees of Black Hawk. Additionally, such
payments could be subject to a 20% excise tax under section 4999 of the Code on
payments made to the option holder that are deemed to be excess parachute
payments under section 280G of the Code. In general, parachute payments are
payments made to officers, certain shareholders and other highly compensated
individuals that are contingent on a change in the ownership or effective
control of a corporation, and are in excess of three times an individual's
annualized compensation income. If payments are deemed parachute payments, the
excess of such payments over the holder's applicable annualized income are
subject to the excise tax. The excise tax may be subject to withholding for
holders of stock options that are employees. There are exceptions for payments
that are established by clear and convincing evidence to be reasonable
compensation. Whether payments to option holders will be deemed excess
parachute payments will depend on each such option holder's particular
circumstances.
43
Each option holder should consult its own tax advisor to determine the
particular tax consequences to it of payments to be made with respect to its
options.
Backup Withholding
A shareholder whose common stock is converted to cash pursuant to the
Merger may be subject to backup withholding equal to the fourth lowest tax rate
under section 1(c) of the Code with respect to the gross proceeds from the
conversion of such common stock unless such shareholder (1) is a corporation or
other exempt recipient and, when required, establishes this exemption or (2)
provides its correct taxpayer identification number, certifies that it is not
currently subject to backup withholding and otherwise complies with applicable
requirements of the backup withholding rules. A shareholder who does not
provide Black Hawk with its correct taxpayer identification number may be
subject to penalties imposed by the IRS. Any amount withheld under these rules
will be credited against the shareholder's federal income tax liability.
Black Hawk will report to shareholders and to the IRS the amount of any
reportable payments, including payments made to shareholders pursuant to the
Merger, and any amount withheld pursuant to the Merger.
Each shareholder or option holder should consult his, her or its own tax
advisor with respect to the particular tax consequences to it of the
transactions described herein, including the applicability and effect of state,
local and foreign tax law.
Tax Treatment to Buyers
Jeffrey P. Jacobs, the Trust, Richard E. Jacobs and entities under their
sole control will transfer to Gameco all of the equity interests in Diversified
Opportunities Group Ltd. (the "Gameco Formation Transaction"). As a result of
the Gameco Formation Transaction, Gameco will, indirectly through its ownership
of 100% of the equity interests in Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd., own
1,333,333 shares of Black Hawk's outstanding common stock. It is intended that
the Gameco Formation Transaction will qualify as a transfer to a controlled
corporation in which gain or loss is not recognized under Section 351 of the
Code. In addition, no gain or loss will be recognized in the Merger by Gameco,
BH Acquisition or Black Hawk.
Gameco is currently taxed as an S corporation pursuant to Subchapter S of
the Code. In general, subject to certain exceptions, an S corporation does not
pay income tax on its earnings, but instead its taxable income is taxed at the
shareholder level. Following the Merger, Gameco intends elect Qualified
Subchapter S Subsidiary status for Black Hawk. It is intended that pursuant to
the Regulations under Section 1361 of the Code, the Qualified Subchapter S
Subsidiary election should cause Black Hawk to be treated as if it had
liquidated into Gameco in a tax-free liquidation under Section 332 of the Code.
Fees and Expenses
Whether or not the Merger is consummated and except as otherwise described
herein, all fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Merger will be
paid by the party incurring such fees and expenses, except that Black Hawk and
Gameco will share costs and expenses relating to the printing and mailing of
this proxy statement and certain filing fees.
44
Estimated fees and expenses (rounded to the nearest thousand) incurred or
to be paid by Black Hawk or Gameco in connection with the Merger and related
transactions are as follows:
Black Hawk Gameco
---------- --------
Advisory fees/(1)/....................................................... $ 120,000 $250,000
Special Committee's financial advisor's fees/(2)/........................ 1,250,000 --
Legal and accounting fees and expenses................................... 450,000 170,000
Printing and solicitation fees and expenses.............................. 25,000 25,000
Special Committee fees................................................... 20,000 --
SEC filing fees.......................................................... 4,000 4,000
Other expenses........................................................... 131,000 --
---------- --------
Total.................................................................. $2,000,000 $449,000
========== ========
__________________
(1) The above table does not include fees and commissions payable in connection
with the financing to be obtained by the Buyers. See "Special Factors--
Financing of the Merger."
(2) See "Special Factors--Opinion of Financial Advisor to the Special
Committee."
To the extent not paid by Gameco or Black Hawk prior to consummation of the
Merger, all such fees and expenses will be paid by Black Hawk if the Merger is
consummated. If the Merger is not consummated, each party will bear its
respective fees and expenses, as provided in the Merger Agreement. See "The
Merger Agreement--Fees and Expenses."
45
INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SPECIAL MEETING
Time, Place and Date
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by
the Board of Directors of proxies from Black Hawk shareholders for use at a
Special Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 11:00 a.m., Mountain Time, on
Friday, January 4, 2002, at the Hilton Garden Inn, Denver International Airport,
16475 E. 40th Circle, Aurora, Colorado 80011 or at any adjournment or
postponement thereof, pursuant to the enclosed Notice of Special Meeting of
Shareholders.
Purpose of the Special Meeting
At the Special Meeting, the shareholders of the Company will be asked to
consider and vote upon the approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby. A copy of the Merger Agreement is attached to this proxy
statement as Annex A. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, each outstanding share
of common stock other than (1) common stock held by Gameco, BH Acquisition or
Diversified, or (2) common stock held by shareholders who perfect their rights
under Colorado law to dissent from the Merger and seek an appraisal of the fair
value of their shares will be converted into $12 per share, without
interest.
Based on the factors described above under "Special Factors--Recommendation
of the Special Committee and Board of Directors" and on the unanimous
recommendation of its Special Committee, the Board of Directors of Black Hawk
recommends that shareholders vote "FOR" approval of the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby.
Record Date; Voting at the Meeting; Quorum
The Board has fixed the close of business on November 30, 2001 as the
record date for the Special Meeting. Only shareholders of record as of the
close of business on the record date will be entitled to notice of and to vote
at the Special Meeting.
As of the close of business on the record date, Black Hawk had outstanding
4,154,400 shares of its $.001 par value common stock, held of record by
approximately 250 registered holders, although Black Hawk believes it has about
1,600 beneficial owners of its common stock. Holders of the common stock are
entitled to one vote per share. The presence in person or by proxy of the
holders of not less than one-half of the voting power of the outstanding common
stock entitled to vote at the Special Meeting constitutes a quorum. Broker non-
votes and shares present or represented but as to which a shareholder abstains
from voting will be included in determining whether there is a quorum at the
Special Meeting.
Required Vote
Under Colorado law, the Merger Agreement must be approved by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the
outstanding shares of common stock. The affirmative vote of 2,077,201 shares of
common stock will be necessary to satisfy this voting requirement. Approval of
the Merger Agreement does not require the affirmative vote of a majority of the
outstanding shares of common stock held by persons other than the Buyers. The
Buyers currently own 1,333,333 shares of common stock in the aggregate,
representing approximately 32.1% of the outstanding shares of common stock as of
the Record Date. The directors and executive officers of Black Hawk who are not
Buyers have also stated that they presently intend to vote their shares (532,414
shares in the aggregate, or approximately 12.8% of the outstanding shares as of
the Record Date) in favor of the Merger Agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby. On April 27, 2001, Robert D. Greenlee and Gameco entered
into a Voting Agreement under which Mr. Greenlee appointed Jeffrey P. Jacobs,
part of the Buyer group, to attend the special meeting of Black Hawk
shareholders described herein and to vote Mr. Greenlee's 486,113 shares (about
11.7% of the shares outstanding as of the record date) for the Merger. The
Buyers, through Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd., have entered into a voting
agreement with Black Hawk under which Diversified will vote its 1,333,333 shares
of Black Hawk's common stock for the Merger. If Diversified and Mr. Greenlee
vote as agreed and Black Hawk's directors and officers vote as indicated,
approval of the Merger Agreement will be assured. See "The Voting Agreements"
below for further details.
46
Because Colorado law requires the Merger Agreement to be approved by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the
outstanding shares of common stock, failure to return an executed proxy card or
to vote in person at the Special Meeting or abstaining from the vote will
constitute, in effect, a vote against approval of the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby. Similarly, broker non-votes will have the
same effect as a vote against approval of the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby.
Voting and Revocation of Proxies
The enclosed proxy card is solicited on behalf of the Board. The giving of
a proxy does not preclude the right to vote in person should any shareholder
giving the proxy so desire. Shareholders have an unconditional right to revoke
their proxy at any time prior to its exercise, either by filing with Black
Hawk's Secretary at Black Hawk's principal executive offices a written
revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by voting in person
at the Special Meeting. Attendance at the Special Meeting without casting a
ballot will not, by itself, constitute revocation of a proxy. Any written
notice revoking a proxy should be sent to Corporate Stock Transfer Inc., 3200
Cherry Creek Drive South, Suite 430, Denver, Colorado 80209.
Action to be Taken at the Special Meeting
All shares of common stock represented at the Special Meeting by properly
executed proxies received prior to or at the Special Meeting, unless previously
revoked, will be voted at the Special Meeting in accordance with the
instructions on the proxies. Unless contrary instructions are indicated,
proxies will be voted FOR the approval of the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby. As explained below in the section entitled
"Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal," a vote in favor of the Merger Agreement means
that the shareholder owning those shares will not have the right to dissent and
seek appraisal of the fair value of such shareholder's shares. Black Hawk does
not know of any matters, other than as described in the Notice of Special
Meeting of Shareholders, which are to come before the Special Meeting. If any
other matters are properly presented at the Special Meeting for action, except
consideration of a motion to adjourn such meeting to another time and/or place
for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies or allowing additional time for
the satisfaction of conditions to the Merger, the persons named in the enclosed
proxy card and acting thereunder generally will have discretion to vote on such
matters in accordance with their best judgment. The Merger is also subject to a
number of conditions in addition to shareholder approval. See "The Merger
Agreement--Conditions."
Proxy Solicitation
The cost of preparing this proxy statement will be borne by Black Hawk and
Black Hawk and Gameco will share the cost of its printing and filing. Black
Hawk is requesting that banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and
fiduciaries forward copies of the proxy material to their principals and request
authority for the execution of proxies. Black Hawk may reimburse such persons
for their expenses in so doing. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by
mail, the directors, officers and employees of Black Hawk and its subsidiaries
may, without receiving any additional compensation, solicit proxies by
telephone, telefax, telegram or in person.
No person is authorized to give any information or make any representation
not contained in this proxy statement, and if given or made, such information or
representation should not be relied upon as having been authorized.
Black Hawk shareholders should not send any certificates representing
shares of common stock with their proxy card. If the Merger is consummated, the
procedure for the exchange of certificates representing shares of common stock
will be as set forth in this proxy statement. See "The Merger Agreement--The
Exchange Fund; Payment for Shares of Common Stock" and "The Merger Agreement--
Transfers of Common Stock."
47
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material provisions of the Merger
Agreement and the amendment thereto, copies of which are attached as Annex A to
this proxy statement. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the full text of the Merger Agreement.
The Merger, Merger Consideration
The Merger Agreement provides that the Merger will become effective upon
the filing of articles of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of
Colorado or at such other time, not to exceed 30 days after such filing, as the
parties may agree and specify in the certificate of merger (the "Effective
Time"). If the Merger is approved at the Special Meeting by the holders of a
majority of all outstanding shares of common stock, and the other conditions to
the Merger are satisfied, including approvals of the Colorado and Nevada Gaming
Commissions, it is currently anticipated that the Merger will be consummated in
January or February 2002; however, there can be no assurance as to the timing of
the consummation of the Merger or that the Merger will be consummated.
At the Effective Time, BH Acquisition will be merged with and into Black
Hawk, the separate corporate existence of BH Acquisition will cease and Black
Hawk will continue as the surviving corporation. At the Effective Time:
. each share of Black Hawk common stock, issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than common stock held
by Gameco, BH Acquisition, Diversified or dissenting shareholders)
will, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of
the holder thereof, be converted into and become the right to receive
$12 per share, without interest (the "Merger Consideration");
. each share of Black Hawk common stock issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time that is owned by Gameco, BH
Acquisition or Diversified will automatically be canceled, retired and
cease to exist and no payment will be made with respect thereto;
. each share of common stock of BH Acquisition issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time will be converted into and
become one share of common stock of Black Hawk as the surviving
corporation and will constitute the only outstanding share of capital
stock of Black Hawk;
. dissenting shareholders who do not vote to approve the Merger
Agreement and who otherwise strictly comply with the provisions of the
Colorado Business Corporation Act regarding statutory appraisal rights
have the right to seek a determination of the fair value of the shares
of common stock and payment in cash therefor in lieu of the Merger
Consideration (see "Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal"); and
. each certificate representing shares of Black Hawk common stock that
have been converted to cash under the terms of the Merger Agreement (a
"Certificate") will, after the Effective Time, evidence only the right
to receive, upon the surrender of such Certificate, an amount of cash
per share equal to $12, without interest.
Treatment of Certain Shares Held by the Buyers
Prior to the Effective Time, each of Jeffrey P. Jacobs and the Trust will
contribute his or its interests in Diversified to Gameco in exchange for shares
of capital stock of Gameco. The shares of Black Hawk common stock held by
Diversified will, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, be canceled in the Merger
and no consideration will be paid therefor.
48
The Exchange Fund; Payment for Shares of Black Hawk Common Stock
On or before the closing date of the Merger, Gameco will enter into an
agreement with a bank, trust company or other exchange agent selected by Gameco
and reasonably satisfactory to Black Hawk (the "Exchange Agent"). As of the
Effective Time, Gameco or Black Hawk will deposit or cause to be deposited with
the Exchange Agent cash in the amount equal to the aggregate Merger
Consideration (such amount being defined as the number of shares to be purchased
multiplied by $12, and hereinafter referred to as the "Exchange Fund") for the
benefit of holders of shares of Black Hawk common stock (other than common stock
held by dissenting shareholders and shares to be canceled without consideration
pursuant to the Merger Agreement).
Within five days following the Effective Time, the Exchange Agent will mail
to each holder of record of shares of common stock that have been converted
pursuant to the Merger Agreement into the right to receive Merger Consideration,
a letter of transmittal and instructions for use in surrendering Certificates in
exchange for the Merger Consideration. No shareholder should surrender any
Certificate until the shareholder receives the letter of transmittal and other
instructions relating to surrender. Upon surrender of a Certificate for
cancellation to the Exchange Agent, together with a letter of transmittal, duly
executed, and such other customary documents as may be required pursuant to the
instructions, the holder of such Certificate will be entitled to receive in
exchange therefor the Merger Consideration into which the number of shares of
common stock previously represented by such Certificate shall have been
converted pursuant to the Merger Agreement, without any interest thereon, and
the Certificates so surrendered will be canceled.
If payment of the Merger Consideration is to be made to a person other than
the person in whose name the Certificate surrendered is registered, it will be a
condition of payment that the Certificate so surrendered will be properly
endorsed (together with signature guarantees on such Certificate) or otherwise
be in proper form for transfer and that the person requesting such payment pay
to the Exchange Agent any transfer or other taxes required by reason of the
payment of the Merger Consideration to a person other than the registered holder
thereof or establish to the satisfaction of the Exchange Agent that such tax has
been paid or is not applicable.
Shareholders should not send their Certificates now and should send them
only pursuant to instructions set forth in the letter of transmittal to be
mailed to shareholders promptly after the Effective Time. In all cases, the
Merger Consideration will be paid only in accordance with the procedures set
forth in this proxy statement and the letter of transmittal.
Three hundred and sixty-five days after the Effective Time, the Exchange
Agent will deliver to Black Hawk, or otherwise at the direction of Black Hawk,
any portion of the Exchange Fund that remains undistributed to or unclaimed by
the holders of Certificates (including the proceeds of any investments thereof).
Any holders of Certificates who have not theretofore complied with the above-
described procedures to receive payment of the Merger Consideration may then
look only to Black Hawk for payment of the Merger Consideration to which they
are entitled.
Transfers of Common Stock
After the Effective Time, Black Hawk's stock transfer books will be closed,
and there will be no further transfers of Certificates on the records of Black
Hawk or its transfer agent. If, after the Effective Time, Certificates are
presented to the Exchange Agent or Black Hawk, they will be canceled and
exchanged for the Merger Consideration as provided above and pursuant to the
terms of the Merger Agreement (subject to applicable law in the case of
dissenting shareholders).
Treatment of Stock Options
At the Effective Time, each outstanding option to acquire common stock will
be canceled. In consideration of such cancellation, Black Hawk will pay to the
holder of each such canceled stock option a cash payment equal to the product of
(1) the excess, if any, of the Merger Consideration over the per share exercise
price of such stock option, multiplied by (2) the aggregate number of shares of
common stock then subject to such stock option, subject to any required
withholding of taxes. At the Effective Time, all such stock options will be
converted into, and will thereafter only represent the right to receive, the
cash payment described herein.
49
Prior to the Effective Time, Black Hawk will use its best efforts to make
any amendments to the terms of any stock option agreements with the holder of
stock options granted under Black Hawk's stock option plans that are necessary
or appropriate to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement, including the waiver of any vesting conditions.
Conditions
The respective obligations of Gameco and BH Acquisition and of Black Hawk
to consummate the Merger are subject to the fulfillment or waiver (to the extent
permitted by applicable law) at or prior to the Effective Time of certain
conditions including the following:
. the Merger Agreement shall have been adopted by the requisite vote of
the shareholders of Black Hawk in accordance with Colorado Business
Corporation Act;
. none of the parties to the Merger Agreement shall be subject to any
order or injunction of any governmental authority of competent
jurisdiction that prohibits the consummation of the Merger; if any
such order or injunction shall have been issued, each party has agreed
to use its reasonable best efforts to have such order overturned or
injunction lifted; and
. the waiting period with respect to consummation of the Merger under
the HSR Act, if applicable, shall have expired or been terminated.
Unless waived by Black Hawk, the obligation of Black Hawk to effect the
Merger is also subject to the following additional conditions:
. Gameco and BH Acquisition shall have performed in all material
respects their agreements contained in the Merger Agreement required
to be performed on or prior to the Effective Time and the
representations and warranties of Gameco and BH Acquisition contained
in the Merger Agreement shall be true and correct on and as of the
Effective Time as if made at and as of such date (except to the extent
that such representations and warranties speak as of an earlier date),
except for failures to perform or to be true and correct that would
not reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on Gameco
or BH Acquisition, and Black Hawk shall have received a certificate of
the chief executive officer or chief financial officer of Gameco to
that effect; and
. all approvals of the Colorado and Nevada Gaming Commissions required
to be obtained in order to permit consummation of the Merger under
applicable law shall have been obtained, except for any approvals
whose unavailability would not, singly or in the aggregate, reasonably
be expected to (1) have a material adverse effect on Black Hawk after
the Effective Time, or (2) result in Black Hawk or its subsidiaries
failing to meet the standards for licensing, suitability or character
under any gaming laws relating to the conduct of Gameco's or Black
Hawk's business which (after taking into account the anticipated act
of such failure to so meet such standards on other authorities) would
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on Black Hawk
(after giving effect to the Merger).
Unless waived by Gameco and BH Acquisition, the obligations of Gameco and
BH Acquisition to effect the Merger are subject to the following additional
conditions:
. Black Hawk shall have performed in all material respects its
agreements contained in the Merger Agreement required to be performed
on or prior to the Effective Time and the representations and
warranties of Black Hawk contained in the Merger Agreement shall be
true and correct on and as of the Effective Time as if made at and as
of such date (except to the extent that such representations and
warranties speak as of an earlier date), except for failures to
perform and to be true and correct that would not reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect on Black
50
Hawk, and Gameco shall have received a certificate of the chief
executive officer or the chief financial officer of Black Hawk to that
effect;
. all approvals of the Colorado and Nevada Gaming Commissions required
to be obtained in order to permit consummation of the Merger under
applicable law shall have been obtained, except for any approvals
whose unavailability would not reasonably be expected to (1) have a
material adverse effect on Gameco, or (2) result in Gameco or its
subsidiaries failing to meet the standards for licensing, suitability
or character under any gaming laws relating to the conduct of Gameco's
or Black Hawk's business which (after taking into account the
anticipated impact of such failure to so meet such standards on other
authorities) would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse
effect on Gameco (after giving effect to the Merger); and
. the number of dissenting shares shall constitute not more than 10% of
the shares of Black Hawk outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time.
Representations and Warranties
The Merger Agreement contains representations and warranties of Gameco and
BH Acquisition and Black Hawk.
. The representations and warranties of Gameco and BH Acquisition relate
to, among other things:
. their respective organization and qualification to do business;
. their authority to enter into and consummate the Merger Agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby;
. the absence of a conflict between the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, with laws applicable to, and
material agreements of, Gameco and BH Acquisition;
. the consents and filings required with respect to the Merger Agreement
and the transactions contemplated thereby;
. the accuracy of the information provided by Gameco and BH Acquisition
for inclusion in this proxy statement and in filings to be made with
the SEC with respect to the proposed Merger;
. approval of the Merger Agreement by the shareholders of Gameco and BH
Acquisition; and
. the brokers used by Gameco and BH Acquisition.
The representations and warranties of Black Hawk relate to, among other things:
. the organization and qualification to do business of Black Hawk and
its subsidiaries;
. the capitalization of Black Hawk;
. Black Hawk's and its subsidiaries' authority to enter into and
consummate the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby;
. the absence of a conflict between the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, with laws applicable to, and
material agreements of, Black Hawk and its subsidiaries;
. the consents and filings required with respect to the Merger Agreement
and the transactions contemplated thereby;
51
. the accuracy of previous filings made with the SEC;
. compliance with law and contracts;
. the accuracy of the proxy statement and filings made with the SEC with
respect to the proposed Merger;
. the absence of undisclosed liabilities and changes in the business of
Black Hawk;
. the status of litigation;
. compliance with respect to taxes, employee plans and environmental
matters;
. title to properties;
. the required vote of shareholders of Black Hawk with respect to the
proposed Merger; and
. the brokers used by Black Hawk.
Covenants
Black Hawk has agreed to operate, and to cause each of its subsidiaries to
operate, their respective businesses in the ordinary and usual course prior to
the Effective Time. In this regard, Black Hawk has agreed that it will not,
without the consent of Gameco, engage in certain types of transactions.
Specifically, Black Hawk has agreed that prior to the Effective Time, Black Hawk
shall, and shall cause its subsidiaries to:
. conduct their respective businesses in the ordinary and usual course
of business and consistent with past practice, including with respect
to casino credit policies;
. not (a) amend or propose to amend their respective articles of
incorporation or bylaws or equivalent constitutional documents, (b)
split, combine or reclassify their outstanding capital stock, or (c)
declare, set aside or pay any dividend or distribution payable in
cash, stock, property or otherwise, except for the payment of
dividends or distributions to Black Hawk or a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Black Hawk by a director or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
Black Hawk;
. not issue, sell, pledge or dispose of, or agree to issue, sell, pledge
or dispose of, any additional shares of, or any options, warrants or
rights of any kind to acquire any shares of, their capital stock of
any class or any debt or equity securities convertible into or
. exchangeable for any such capital stock, except that Black Hawk may
issue shares upon the exercise of options outstanding on the date
hereof;
. not (a) incur or become contingently liable with respect to any
indebtedness for borrowed money other than borrowings in the ordinary
course of business or borrowings under the existing credit facilities
of Black Hawk or of any of its subsidiaries up to the existing
borrowing limit, and borrowings to refinance existing indebtedness on
terms which are reasonably acceptable to Gameco; provided that in no
event shall the aggregate indebtedness of Black Hawk and its
subsidiaries, net of all cash and cash equivalents, exceed
$75,000,000,(b) redeem, purchase, acquire or offer to purchase or
acquire any shares of its capital stock or any options, warrants or
rights to acquire any of its capital stock or any security convertible
into or exchangeable for its capital stock other than in connection
with the exercise of outstanding options pursuant to the terms of
Black Hawk's option plans, (c) without Gameco's consent, or except as
previously disclosed to Gameco, make any acquisition of any assets or
businesses other than expenditures for
52
current assets in the ordinary course of business and expenditures for
fixed or capital assets in the ordinary course of business, (d)
without Gameco's consent acquire any gaming property in Colorado; (e)
sell, pledge, dispose of or encumber any assets or businesses other
than sales of businesses or assets disclosed to Gameco, pledges or
encumbrances pursuant to existing edit facilities or other permitted
borrowings, sales of real estate assets or facilities for cash
consideration (including any debt assumed by the buyer of such real
estate, assets or facilities) to non-affiliates of Black Hawk of less
than $100,000 in each such case and $500,000 in the aggregate, sales
or dispositions of businesses or assets as may be required by
applicable law, and sales or dispositions of assets in the ordinary
course, or (f) enter into any binding contract, agreement, commitment
or arrangement with respect to any of the foregoing;
. use all reasonable efforts to preserve intact their respective
business organizations and goodwill, keep available the services of
their respective present officers and key employees, and preserve the
goodwill and business relationships with customers and others having
business relationships with them, other than as expressly permitted by
the terms of the Merger Agreement;
. not enter into, amend, modify or renew any employment, consulting,
severance or similar agreement with, or grant any salary, wage or
other increase in compensation or increase in any employee benefit to,
any director or officer of Black Hawk or of any of its subsidiaries,
except(a) for changes that are required by applicable law, (b) to
satisfy existing obligations, or (c) in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice;
. not enter into, establish, adopt, amend or modify any pension,
retirement, stock purchase, savings, profit sharing, deferred
compensation, consulting, bonus, group insurance or other employee
benefit, incentive or welfare plan, agreement, program or arrangement,
in respect of any director, officer or employee of Black Hawk or of
any of its subsidiaries, except in each such case as may be required
by applicable law or by the terms of contractual obligations existing
as of the date hereof, including any collective bargaining agreement;
. not make expenditures, including, but not limited to, capital
expenditures, or enter into any binding commitment or contract to make
expenditures, except (a) expenditures which Black Hawk or its
subsidiaries are currently contractually committed to make, (b) other
expenditures not exceeding $250,000 individually or $500,000 in the
aggregate, (c) for emergency repairs and other expenditures necessary
in light of circumstances not anticipated as of the date of the Merger
Agreement which are necessary to avoid significant disruption to Black
Hawk's business or operations consistent with past practice (and, if
reasonably practicable, after consultation with Gameco), or (d) for
repairs and maintenance in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice;
. not make, change or revoke any material tax election unless required
by law or make any agreement or settlement with any taxing authority
regarding any material amount of taxes or which would reasonably be
expected to materially increase the obligations of Black Hawk to pay
taxes in the future; and
. not settle or compromise any litigation to which Black Hawk or any of
its subsidiaries is a party or with respect to which they may incur
liability in excess of $250,000 per action or claim or $500,000 for
all actions and claims in the aggregate.
Nothing contained in the Merger Agreement is intended to give Gameco,
directly or indirectly, rights to control or direct Black Hawk's operations
prior to the Effective Time. Prior to the Effective Time, Black Hawk will
exercise, consistent with the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement,
complete control and supervision of its operations.
Black Hawk and Gameco have made further agreements regarding, among other
things, advising each other of representations or warranties contained in the
Merger Agreement becoming untrue, of their respective failure to
53
comply with or satisfy covenants, conditions or agreements contained in the
Merger Agreement, and of any change, event or circumstance that could reasonably
be expected to have a material adverse effect on such party or on its ability to
consummate the proposed Merger, cooperating in the preparation of required
governmental filings, in obtaining required permits and regulatory approvals and
in the release of public announcements, and granting access to information and
maintaining confidentiality.
The Merger Agreement provides that, prior to the Effective Time or earlier
termination of the Merger Agreement, except as described below, Black Hawk will
not, and will not permit any of its subsidiaries to, initiate, solicit,
negotiate, encourage or provide confidential information to facilitate, and
Black Hawk will use all reasonable efforts to cause any officer, director or
employee of Black Hawk, or any attorney, accountant, investment banker,
financial advisor or other agent retained by it or any of its subsidiaries not
to, initiate, solicit, negotiate, encourage or provide non-public or
confidential information to facilitate, any proposal or offer to acquire all or
any substantial part of the business, properties or capital stock of Black Hawk,
whether by merger, purchase of assets, tender offer or otherwise, whether for
cash, securities or any other consideration or combination thereof (any such
transactions being referred to herein as an "Acquisition Transaction").
Notwithstanding the limitations described above, Black Hawk may, prior to
receipt of Black Hawk's shareholders' approval of the Merger Agreement, in
response to an unsolicited bona fide written offer or proposal with respect to a
potential or proposed Acquisition Transaction ("Acquisition Proposal") from a
corporation, partnership, person or other entity or group (a "Potential
Acquirer") which Black Hawk's Board of Directors determines in good faith and
after consultation with the Special Committee's independent financial advisor,
could reasonably be expected to result (if consummated pursuant to its terms) in
an Acquisition Transaction more favorable to Black Hawk's shareholders than the
Merger (a "Qualifying Proposal"), furnish (subject to the execution of a
confidentiality agreement substantially similar to the confidentiality agreement
between Black Hawk and Gameco) confidential or non-public information to, and
negotiate with, such Potential Acquirer, may resolve to accept, or recommend,
and, upon termination of the Merger Agreement and after payment to Gameco of the
fee described under "--Termination" below, enter into agreements relating to, a
Qualifying Proposal which Black Hawk's Board of Directors, in good faith, has
determined is reasonably likely to be consummated. Black Hawk's Board of
Directors may also take and disclose to Black Hawk's shareholders a position
contemplated by Rule 14e-2 under the Exchange Act (stating Black Hawk's position
on any third-party tender offers) or otherwise make disclosure required by the
federal securities laws.
Termination
The Merger Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at
any time prior to the Effective Time (notwithstanding any approval of the Merger
Agreement by the shareholders of Black Hawk):
. by mutual written consent of Black Hawk and Gameco;
. by either Black Hawk or Gameco, if the Merger has not been consummated
by April 1, 2002, provided that the right to terminate the Merger
Agreement is not available to any party whose failure to fulfill any
of its obligations under the Merger Agreement has been the cause of or
resulted in the failure to consummate the Merger by such date;
. by either Black Hawk or Gameco if any judgment, injunction, order or
decree of a court or governmental agency or authority of competent
jurisdiction restrains or prohibits the consummation of the Merger,
and such judgment, injunction, order or decree becomes final and
nonappealable and was not entered at the request of the terminating
party;
. by either Black Hawk or Gameco, if (a) there has been a breach by the
other party of any representation or warranty contained in the Merger
Agreement which has not been cured in all material respects within 30
days after written notice of such breach by the terminating party, or
(b) there has been a breach of any of the covenants or agreements set
forth in the Merger Agreement on the part of the other party, which is
not curable or, if curable, is not cured within 30 days after written
notice of such breach is given by the terminating party to the other
party;
54
. by Black Hawk if, prior to receipt of Black Hawk shareholders'
approval of the Merger Agreement, Black Hawk receives a Superior
Proposal, resolves to accept such Superior Proposal, and gives Gameco
two days' prior written notice of its intention to terminate the
Merger Agreement, however such termination will not be effective until
such time as the payment discussed below under "--Expenses and Fees"
has been received by Gameco;
. by Gameco, if the Board of Directors of Black Hawk has failed to
recommend, or withdraws, modifies or amends in any material respect
its approval or recommendation of the Merger or resolves to do any of
the foregoing, or has recommended another Acquisition Proposal or if
the Board of Directors of Black Hawk has resolved to accept a Superior
Proposal or has recommended to the shareholders of Black Hawk that
they tender their shares in a tender or an exchange offer commenced by
a third party (excluding any affiliate of Gameco or any group of which
any affiliate of Black Hawk is a member); or
. by Black Hawk or Gameco if the shareholders of Black Hawk fail to
approve the Merger at a duly held meeting of shareholders called for
such purpose (including any adjournment or postponement thereof) or by
Gameco if holders of more than 10% of Black Hawk's outstanding shares
vote against the Merger and exercise their dissenters' rights.
Expenses and Fees
All costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby will be paid by the party incurring such
expenses, except that those expenses incurred in connection with the printing of
this proxy statement and certain filing fees will be shared equally.
Black Hawk agreed to pay Gameco a fee in the amount of $1 million if:
. Black Hawk terminates the Merger Agreement because, prior to receipt
of Black Hawk's shareholders' approval, it has received a Superior
Proposal from a third party and resolves to accept the Superior
Proposal;
. Gameco terminates the Agreement because the Board of Directors of
Black Hawk has failed to recommend, or withdraws, modifies or amends
in any material respect its approval of the Merger, has recommended a
Superior Proposal, has resolved to accept a Superior Proposal or has
recommended a third party tender or exchange offer to shareholders; or
. the Merger Agreement is terminated for any reason at a time at which
Gameco was not in material breach of its representations, warranties,
covenants and agreements contained in the Merger Agreement and was
entitled to terminate the Merger Agreement because Black Hawk
shareholders failed to approve the Merger at a duly called meeting and
(a) prior to the time of the shareholders' meeting a proposal by a
third party relating to an Acquisition Transaction had been publicly
proposed or publicly announced, and (b) on or prior to the 12 month
anniversary of the termination of the Merger Agreement Black Hawk or
any of its subsidiaries or affiliates enters into an agreement or
letter of intent (or resolves or announces an intention to do so) with
respect to an Acquisition Transaction involving a person, entity or
group if such person, entity, group (or any member of such group, or
any affiliate of any of the foregoing) made a proposal with respect to
an Acquisition Transaction on or after the date of the Merger
Agreement and prior to the shareholders' meeting and such Acquisition
Transaction is consummated.
Gameco will pay Black Hawk a fee of $2 million if Gameco fails to
consummate the Merger by 12:00 noon Mountain Time on April 1, 2002 if Black Hawk
has satisfied the conditions to closing the Merger required of it, unless the
failure to do so resulted from breach of a representation, warranty or covenant
of Gameco or BH Acquisition under the Merger Agreement. If Gameco fails to
close the Merger because it cannot obtain financing, payment of the $2 million
fee will be considered Black Hawk's liquidated damages.
55
Amendment/Waiver
Before or after approval of the Merger Agreement by the shareholders, the
Merger Agreement may be amended by the written agreement of the parties thereto
at any time prior to the Effective Time if such amendment is approved by their
respective boards of directors.
At any time prior to the Effective Time, Black Hawk, Gameco and BH
Acquisition may extend the time for performance of any of the obligations or
other acts of the other parties to the Merger Agreement, waive any inaccuracies
in the representations and warranties contained in the Merger Agreement or in
any document delivered pursuant to the Merger Agreement, or waive compliance
with any agreements or conditions contained in the Merger Agreement. Any
extension or waiver will be valid only if set forth in writing and signed by the
party making such extension or waiver.
56
THE VOTING AGREEMENTS
Gameco and Robert D. Greenlee, a shareholder of Black Hawk, entered into a
Voting Agreement on April 27, 2001. The agreement covers 486,113 shares, or
approximately 11.7% of Black Hawk's outstanding shares representing all of Mr.
Greenlee's share holdings in Black Hawk. Mr. Greenlee has agreed that during
the term of the voting agreement he will not initiate, solicit, negotiate,
encourage or provide confidential information to facilitate any other
acquisition transaction involving Black Hawk.
During the term of the voting agreement, Mr. Greenlee has agreed that he
will vote for the Merger Agreement described in this proxy statement and, to
that end, he has appointed Jeffrey P. Jacobs as his proxy to attend and vote his
shares at the special meeting contemplated herein.
The agreement and the proxy granted by Mr. Greenlee to Mr. Jacobs will
terminate automatically on the earliest of:
. the date on which any amendment or modification to the Merger
. Agreement is made that reduces the Merger Consideration to less than
$12 cash per share;
. the date on which the Merger Agreement is terminated;
. the closing of the Merger Agreement; and
. February 11, 2002.
Effective April 25, 2001, Diversified entered into a voting agreement with
Black Hawk under which Diversified will vote its 1,333,333 shares, or
approximately 32.1% of Black Hawk's shares outstanding, for the Merger
Agreement. The term and termination provisions in this agreement are similar to
those described above with respect to Mr. Greenlee's voting agreement.
57
GAMING APPROVALS AND DELAYED CLOSING
General
Black Hawk owns and operates casinos in Colorado and Nevada. Black Hawk,
its directors, key officers and principal shareholders are subject to the gaming
laws, rules and regulations of both states. A summary of these extensive gaming
laws, rules and regulations is set forth in Item 1 of Black Hawk's Annual Report
on Form 10-K included with this proxy statement.
Colorado Gaming Regulations
Black Hawk's operations in Colorado are subject to the Colorado Limited Act
of 1991, as amended, and the regulations of the Colorado Limited Gaming Control
Commission (collectively, the "Colorado gaming law") and various local
ordinances and regulations. Black Hawk's operations are subject to the licensing
and regulatory control of the Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission
("Colorado Gaming Commission") and the Colorado Division of Gaming, as well as
the City of Black Hawk.
Under Colorado gaming law, the Colorado Gaming Commission must provide
prior approval of a change of ownership of any licensee or any sale, lease,
purchase, conveyance, or acquisition of an interest in a licensee. Gameco has
filed applications with the Colorado Gaming Commission, seeking the necessary
approvals of the transfer of ownership of The Lodge Casino and the Gilpin Hotel
& Casino through the Merger. The Colorado Division of Gaming reviews and
investigates applications for approval and makes recommendations on those
applications to the Colorado Gaming Commission for final action. There can be
no assurance that these approvals will be granted or will be granted on a timely
basis or without burdensome conditions. Furthermore, any such approval, if
granted, does not constitute a finding, recommendation or approval by the
Colorado Gaming Commission as to the merits of the Merger.
In seeking approval of the transfer of ownership of The Lodge Casino and
the Gilpin Hotel & Casino, Gameco must satisfy the Colorado Gaming Commission as
to a variety of stringent standards. In deciding whether to approve or deny
Gameco's application, the Colorado Gaming Commission may consider any facts that
are deemed material to the qualifications of the applicant, including whether
the applicant is of good moral character.
The shareholders, officers and directors of Gameco at the time of
completion of the Merger may be required to be licensed or found suitable by the
Colorado Gaming Commission. The Director of the Division of Gaming may require
any person applying to acquire an interest in a licensee to provide background
information, the source of funding used to obtain such interest, and a sworn
statement that such person is not holding the interest for another party. The
Colorado Gaming Commission may require any person applying to acquire an
interest in a licensee to undergo a complete background investigation.
In determining whether to approve or deny an application, the Colorado
Gaming Commission may consider whether the applicant is suitable to hold the
license applied for. To be suitable under Colorado gaming law, an applicant
must be able to be licensed in light of his prior acts, associations, and
financial conditions. An applicant must provide all information requested by
the Colorado Gaming Commission and permit investigation into his background;
failure to do so is grounds for denial of the license. There can be no
assurances that the Commission will make a finding of suitability or approve an
application for a license in a timely manner or at all.
Nevada Gaming Regulations
Black Hawk's operations in Nevada are subject to the Nevada Gaming Control
Act and the regulations of the Nevada Gaming Commission and the Nevada State
Gaming Control Board (collectively, the "Nevada Act") and various local
ordinances and regulations. Black Hawk's operations are subject to the licensing
and regulatory control of the Nevada Gaming Commission, the Nevada State Gaming
Control Board and the City of Reno (collectively, the "Nevada Gaming
Authorities").
Regulations of the Nevada Gaming Commission provide that control of a
registered publicly traded corporation such as Black Hawk cannot be acquired
through a tender offer, merger, consolidation, acquisition of
58
assets, management or consulting agreements or any form of takeover whatsoever
without the prior approval of the Nevada Gaming Commission. Gameco has filed
applications seeking the necessary approvals with the Nevada State Gaming
Control Board and the Nevada Gaming Commission. The Nevada State Gaming Control
Board reviews and investigates applications for approval and makes
recommendations on those applications to the Nevada Gaming Commission for final
action. There can be no assurance that these approvals will be granted or will
be granted on a timely basis or without burdensome conditions. Furthermore, any
such approval, if granted, does not constitute a finding, recommendation or
approval by the Nevada State Gaming Control Board or the Nevada Gaming
Commission as to the merits of the Merger. Any representation to the contrary is
unlawful.
In seeking approval to acquire control of Black Hawk, Gameco must satisfy
the Nevada Gaming Commission as to a variety of stringent standards. The Nevada
State Gaming Control Board and the Nevada Gaming Commission will consider all
relevant material facts in determining whether to grant this approval, and may
consider not only the effects of the Merger but also any other facts that are
deemed relevant. Such facts may include, among others, (a) the business history
of the applicant, including its record of financial stability, integrity and
success of its operations, as well as its current business activities, (b) the
adequacy of the proposed financing, and (c) whether the Merger will create a
significant risk that Black Hawk or its subsidiary will not satisfy their
financial obligations as they become due or satisfy all financial and regulatory
requirements imposed by the Nevada Act.
Gameco has filed an application with the Nevada State Gaming Control Board
and the Nevada Gaming Commission seeking approval to acquire control of Black
Hawk and seeking that it be found suitable as the sole shareholder of Black Hawk
at the time of completion of the Merger. In addition, the shareholders,
officers and directors of Gameco at the time of completion of the Merger will be
required to be found suitable or licensed by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. The
Nevada Gaming Authorities may deny an application for licensing, a finding of
suitability or registration for any cause that they deem reasonable. A finding
of suitability is comparable to licensing, and both require the submission of
detailed personal and financial information followed by a thorough
investigation. All individuals required to file applications for findings of
suitability as officers and directors of Black Hawk and its subsidiary, Gold
Dust West Casino, Inc., at the time of completion of the Merger will file
applications with the Nevada State Gaming Control Board and the Nevada Gaming
Commission. Certain approvals will also be required to be obtained in
connection with the financing of the Merger and such approvals will be applied
for. There can be no assurances that these approvals will be granted, or will
be granted on a timely basis.
Louisiana and Virginia Gaming Regulations
The activities of Gameco, Colonial and the Jalou entities are also subject
to the gaming laws and regulations of the states of Louisiana and Virginia.
Black Hawk has been advised that the Buyers described above under "The Parties--
Gameco, Inc., BH Acquisition, Inc. and Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd.", "-
- -Colonial Holdings, Inc." and "--Jalou L.L.C. and Jalou II" are in the process
of seeking approvals from the appropriate gaming authorities in Louisiana and
Virginia with regard to the transactions and such approvals should have no
material impact on the consummation of the Merger.
Possible Delayed Closing
Applications for gaming approvals have been filed in Colorado and Nevada.
Each jurisdiction will assign staff personnel to conduct their respective
investigations. Black Hawk cannot predict how long these investigations will
take. When staff personnel have completed their work, hearings will be held by
the gaming commissions in Colorado and Nevada. Generally, these commissions
meet monthly and matters coming before the commissions must be scheduled in
advance. Black Hawk presently anticipates the application and investigation
processes will be completed, and approvals of the Colorado and Nevada Gaming
Commissions obtained, in January or February 2002, but cannot provide assurance
in that regard.
59
If the Merger Agreement is approved by shareholders of Black Hawk at the
special meeting to be held on January 4, 2002 as described in this proxy
statement, it may be one or two months, or perhaps longer, before the gaming
approvals described above are obtained, the Merger is closed and payment for
your shares is made. Although the Buyers are aggressively pursuing financing
arrangements, because of uncertainties or changes in the financial markets or
otherwise, there is no assurance that they will be able to obtain financing for
the Merger. See "Special Factors--Financing the Merger."
60
DISSENTERS' RIGHTS OF APPRAISAL
The following is a summary of dissenters' rights available to Black Hawk
shareholders, which summary is not intended to be a complete statement of
applicable Colorado law and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Article
113 of the Colorado Business Corporation Act ("CBCA"), which is set forth in its
entirety as Annex C.
Right to Dissent
Black Hawk shareholders are entitled to dissent from the Merger and obtain
payment of the fair value of their shares if and when the Merger is effectuated.
"Fair value," with respect to a dissenter's shares, means the value of the
shares immediately before the Effective Time of the Merger, excluding any
appreciation or depreciation in anticipation of the Merger except to the extent
that exclusion would be inequitable. Under Article 113 of the CBCA, a
shareholder entitled to dissent and obtain payment for his, her or its shares
may not also challenge the corporate action creating the right to dissent unless
the action is unlawful or fraudulent with respect to the shareholder or the
corporation.
Under Section 7-113-103 of the CBCA a record shareholder may assert
dissenters' rights as to fewer than all shares registered in the record
shareholder's name only if the record shareholder dissents with respect to all
shares beneficially owned by any one person and causes the corporation to
receive written notice which states such dissent and the name, address and
federal taxpayer identification number, if any, of each person on whose behalf
the record shareholder asserts dissenters' rights.
Section 7-113-103(2) of the CBCA provides that a beneficial shareholder may
assert dissenters' rights as to the shares held on the beneficial shareholder's
behalf only if (a) the beneficial shareholder causes the corporation to receive
the record shareholder's written consent to the dissent not later than the time
the beneficial shareholder asserts dissenters' rights and (b) the beneficial
shareholder dissents with respect to all shares beneficially owned by the
beneficial shareholder.
Black Hawk will require that, when a record shareholder dissents with
respect to the shares held by any one or more beneficial shareholders, each such
beneficial shareholder must certify to Black Hawk that the beneficial
shareholder has asserted, or will timely assert, dissenters' rights as to all
such shares as to which there is no limitation on the ability to exercise
dissenters' rights.
Procedure for Exercise of Dissenters' Rights
The notice accompanying this proxy statement states that shareholders of
Black Hawk are entitled to assert dissenters' rights under Article 113 of the
CBCA. A Black Hawk shareholder who wishes to assert dissenters' rights shall:
(a) cause Black Hawk to receive before the vote is taken on the Merger at the
special meeting, written notice of the shareholder's intention to demand payment
for the shareholder's shares if the Merger is effectuated; and (b) not vote the
shares in favor of the Merger. A Black Hawk shareholder who does not satisfy
the foregoing requirements will not be entitled to demand payment for his or her
shares under Article 113 of the CBCA.
Dissenters' Notice
If the Merger is approved at the special meeting, Black Hawk will send
written notice to dissenters who are entitled to demand payment for their
shares. The notice required by Black Hawk will be given no later than 10 days
after the Effective Time and will: (a) state that the Merger was authorized and
state the Effective Time or proposed effective date of the Merger, (b) set forth
an address at which Black Hawk will receive payment demands and the address of a
place where certificates must be deposited, (c) supply a form for demanding
payment, which form shall request a dissenter to state an address to which
payment is to be made, (d) set the date by which Black Hawk must receive the
payment demand and certificates for shares, which date will not be less than 30
days after the date the notice is given, (e) state that if a record Black Hawk
shareholder dissents with respect to the shares held by any one or more
beneficial shareholders each such beneficial shareholder must certify to Black
Hawk that the beneficial shareholder and the record shareholder or record
shareholders of all shares owned beneficially by the beneficial
61
shareholder have asserted, or will timely assert, dissenters' rights as to all
such shares as to which there is no limitation of the ability to exercise
dissenters' rights, and (f) be accompanied by a copy of Article 113 of the CBCA.
Procedure to Demand Payment
A shareholder who is given a dissenters' notice to assert dissenters'
rights will, in accordance with the terms of the dissenters' notice, (a) cause
Black Hawk to receive a payment demand (which may be a demand form supplied by
Black Hawk and duly completed or other acceptable writing) and (b) deposit the
shareholder's stock certificates. A shareholder who demands payment in
accordance with the foregoing retains all rights of a shareholder, except the
right to transfer the shares until the Effective Time, and has only the right to
receive payment for the shares after the Effective Time. A demand for payment
and deposit of certificates is irrevocable except that if the Effective Time
does not occur within 60 days after the date set by Black Hawk by which it must
receive the payment demand, Black Hawk will return the deposited certificates
and release the transfer restrictions imposed. If the Effective Time occurs
more than 60 days after the date set by Black Hawk by which it must receive the
payment demand, then Black Hawk will send a new dissenters' notice. A Black
Hawk shareholder who does not demand payment and deposit his or her Black Hawk
share certificates as required by the date or dates set forth in the dissenters'
notice will not be entitled to demand payment for his, her or its Black Hawk
shares under Article 113 of the CBCA, in which case, pursuant to the Merger
Agreement, he, she or it will receive cash consideration for each of his, her or
its shares equal to the per share price received by non-dissenting shareholders.
Payment
At the Effective Time or upon receipt of a payment demand, whichever is
later, Black Hawk will pay each dissenter who complied with the notice
requirements referenced in the preceding paragraph, the Black Hawk estimate of
the fair value of the dissenter's shares plus accrued interest. Payment shall
be accompanied by an audited balance sheet as of the end of the most recent
fiscal year of Black Hawk or, an audited income statement for that year, and an
audited statement of changes in shareholders' equity for that year and an
audited statement of cash flow for that year, as well as the latest available
financial statements, if any, for the interim period, which interim financial
statements will be unaudited. Payment will also be accompanied by a statement
of the estimate by Black Hawk of the fair value of the shares and an explanation
of how the interest was calculated, along with a statement of the dissenter's
right to demand payment and a copy of Article 113 of the CBCA. With respect to
a dissenter who acquired beneficial ownership of his, her or its shares after
Black Hawk's first announcement of the terms of the transaction on April 27,
2001, or who does not certify that his, her or its shares were acquired before
that date, Black Hawk may, in lieu of making the payment described above, offer
to make such payment if the dissenter agrees to accept it in full satisfaction
of the demand.
If Dissenter is Dissatisfied with Offer
If a dissenter disagrees with the Black Hawk payment or offer, such
dissenter may give notice to Black Hawk in writing of the dissenter's estimate
of the fair value of the dissenter's shares and of the amount of interest due
and may demand payment of such estimate, less any payment made prior thereto, or
reject the offer of Black Hawk and demand payment of the fair value of the
shares and interest due if: (a) the dissenter believes that the amount paid or
offered is less than the fair value of the shares or that the interest due was
incorrectly calculated, (b) Black Hawk fails to make payment within 60 days
after the date set by Black Hawk by which it must receive the payment demand or
(c) Black Hawk does not return deposited certificates if the Effective Time is
60 days after the date set by Black Hawk by which the payment demand must be
received by the shareholder asserting dissenter's rights. A dissenter waives
the right to demand payment under this paragraph unless he or she causes Black
Hawk to receive the notice referenced in this paragraph within 30 days after
Black Hawk makes or offers payment for the shares of the dissenter, in which
event, such dissenter will receive all cash for his or her Black Hawk shares in
an amount equal to the amount paid or offered by Black Hawk.
Judicial Appraisal of Shares
If a demand for payment made by a dissenter as set forth above is
unresolved, Black Hawk may, within 60 days after receiving the payment demand,
commence a proceeding and petition a court to determine the fair value of the
shares and accrued interest. If Black Hawk does not commence the proceeding
within the 60 day period, it shall
62
pay to each dissenter whose demand remains unresolved the amount demanded. Black
Hawk must commence any proceeding described above in the District Court of the
County of Gilpin, Colorado. Black Hawk must make all dissenters whose demands
remain unresolved parties to the proceeding as in an action against their
shares, and all parties shall be served with a copy of the petition.
Jurisdiction in which the proceeding is commenced is plenary and exclusive. One
or more persons may be appointed by the court as appraisers to receive evidence
and recommend a decision on the question of fair value. The appraisers will have
the power described in the court order appointing them. The parties to the
proceeding will be entitled to the same discovery rights as parties in other
civil proceedings. Each dissenter made a party to the proceeding will be
entitled to judgment for the amount, if any, by which the court finds the fair
value of the dissenter's shares, plus interest, to exceed the amount paid by
Black Hawk, or for the fair value, plus interest, of a dissenter's shares for
which Black Hawk elected to withhold payment.
Court and Counsel Fees
The court in an appraisal proceeding shall determine all costs of the
proceeding, including the reasonable compensation and expenses of appraisers
appointed by the court. The court will assess the costs against Black Hawk;
except that the court may assess costs against all or some of the dissenters, in
the amount the court finds equitable, to the extent the court finds that the
dissenters acted arbitrarily, vexatiously, or not in good faith in demanding
payment. The court may also assess the fees and expenses of counsel and experts
for the respective parties, in amounts the court finds equitable: (a) against
Black Hawk and in favor of the dissenters if the court finds that Black Hawk did
not substantially comply with its obligations under the dissenter's rights
statute, or (b) against either Black Hawk or one or more dissenters, in favor of
any other party, if the court finds that the party against whom the fees and
expenses are assessed acted arbitrarily, vexatiously or not in good faith with
respect to the rights provided by Article 113 of the CBCA. If the court finds
that the services of counsel for any dissenter were of substantial benefit to
the other dissenters similarly situated, and that the fees for those services
should not be assessed against Black Hawk, the court may award to such counsel
reasonable fees to be paid out of the amount awarded to the dissenters who were
benefited.
Any written notice required to be sent to Black Hawk by a Black Hawk
shareholder electing to exercise his or her dissenter's rights under Article 113
of the CBCA should be to Stanley Politano at the offices of Black Hawk, 240 Main
Street, Black Hawk, Colorado 80422.
63
MARKET FOR THE COMMON STOCK
Common Stock Market Price Information; Dividend Information
Black Hawk's common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the
symbol "BHWK." The following table shows, for the calendar quarters indicated,
the per share high and low closing sale prices of the common stock on the Nasdaq
National Market based on published financial sources. Black Hawk has not paid
any dividends on its common stock since its initial public offering in 1993.
1999 High Low
----
First Quarter $ 8.38 $ 6.25
Second Quarter 8.50 5.63
Third Quarter 7.75 5.50
Fourth Quarter 7.63 5.38
2000 High Low
----
First Quarter $ 7.00 $ 5.38
Second Quarter 7.25 5.63
Third Quarter 7.13 6.00
Fourth Quarter 7.06 6.00
2001 High Low
----
First Quarter $ 9.75 $ 6.50
Second Quarter 10.95 8.50
Third Quarter 10.95 6.83
On February 23, 2001, the last day Black Hawk's stock traded prior to the
public announcement of the Merger transaction described in this proxy statement,
the closing sales price of its common stock on the Nasdaq National Market was
$6.56. On April 26, 2001, the last full trading day prior to the day on which
the execution of the Merger Agreement was publicly announced, the closing sales
price for the common stock on the Nasdaq National Market was $10.28. On
November 28, 2001, the closing sales price for the common stock on the Nasdaq
National Market was $9.79. The market price for Black Hawk common stock is
subject to fluctuation and shareholders are urged to obtain current market
quotations.
Common Stock Purchase Information
Neither Black Hawk nor any of its executive officers or directors, or the
Buyers or any of their affiliates, has engaged in any transaction with respect
to Black Hawk's common stock within the past 60 days. Since December 31, 1998,
none of the foregoing persons has purchased any of Black Hawk's common stock,
except that Black Hawk has issued an aggregate of 5,024 shares of its common
stock to its four outside directors (including the three members of the Special
Committee) as one-half of their $1,000 per meeting director's fees.
64
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial
ownership of Black Hawk's common stock as of November 15, 2001 for: (a) each of
its directors and executive officers, (b) all of the directors and executive
officers as a group, and (c) each person known by Black Hawk to be a beneficial
owner of more than 5% of its common stock. All information with respect to
beneficial ownership by our directors, executive officers or beneficial owners
has been furnished by the respective director, officer or beneficial owner, as
the case may be. Unless indicated otherwise, each of the shareholders has sole
voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock
beneficially owned.
Percentage of
Beneficially Owned Common Stock
Beneficially
Name Shares Options/(1)/ Owned/(3)/
---- ------ ------------ -----------
Jeffrey P. Jacobs 1,333,333 (2)(4) 85,000 33.5%
Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd.
1001 North U.S. Highway One, #710
Jupiter, Florida 33477
Stephen R. Roark 28,571 182,500 4.9%
240 Main Street
Black Hawk, Colorado 80422
Stanley Politano 619 75,000 1.8%
240 Main Street
Black Hawk, Colorado 80422
Frank B. Day 497,211 -- 12.0%
248 Centennial Parkway, Suite 100
Louisville, Colorado 80302
J. Patrick McDuff 1,830 13,250 *
1375 Walnut
Boulder, Colorado 80302
Robert H. Hughes 2,051 15,000 *
27459 Hemlock Drive
Westlake, Ohio 44145
Timothy Knudsen 1,424 1,000 *
213 Vista Circle
North Olmstead, Ohio 44070
Stephen P. Owendoff, Esq. 708 (5) -- *
Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP
3300 BPAmerica Building
300 Public Square
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-2301
Robert D. Greenlee 486,113 -- 11.7%
2060 Broadway, Suite 400
Boulder, Colorado 80302
Officers and Directors as 1,865,747 371,750 49.4%
a group (eight persons)
______________________
*less than 1%
65
(1) Represents shares underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days
and therefore does not include unvested options that will be deemed vested
upon consummation of the Merger.
(2) These shares are held by Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd., an affiliate
of Mr. Jacobs, and are therefore deemed beneficially owned by him.
(3) All percentages are computed in accordance with Rule 13d-3 adopted under
the Exchange Act.
(4) Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd., one of the Buyers, owns 25% of the
membership interests in Black Hawk/Jacobs Entertainment LLC, which owns and
operates The Lodge Casino in Black Hawk, Colorado. Black Hawk owns 75% of
the membership interests and profits and losses are shared between Black
Hawk and Diversified based on their membership interests.
(5) Mr. Owendoff disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares, which are
owned by his law firm.
66
DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT
Black Hawk
Set forth below are the name and business address of each director and
executive officer of Black Hawk and his position with Black Hawk. Also set
forth below are the material occupations, positions, offices and employment of
each such person and the name of any corporation or other organization in which
any material occupation, position, office or employment of each such person was
held during the last five years. All directors and officers are citizens of the
United States.
Name Age Position(s) Held
---- --- ----------------
Jeffrey P. Jacobs 47 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
1001 North U.S. Highway One, #710
Jupiter, Florida 33477
Business Telephone: 561-575-4006
Stephen R. Roark 53 President, Chief Financial Officer and a Director
240 Main Street
Black Hawk, Colorado 80422
Business Telephone: 303-582-1117
Stanley Politano 52 Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
240 Main Street
Black Hawk, Colorado 80422
Business Telephone: 303-582-1117
Frank B. Day 67 A Director
248 Centennial Parkway
Suite 100
Louisville, Colorado 80302
Business Telephone: 303-664-4121
J. Patrick McDuff 52 A Director
1375 Walnut
Boulder, Colorado 80302
Business Telephone: 303-443-0018
Robert H. Hughes 60 A Director
27459 Hemlock Drive
Westlake, Ohio 44145
Business Telephone: 440-835-3193
Timothy Knudsen 47 A Director
213 Vista Circle
North Olmstead, Ohio 44070
Business Telephone: 216-781-5000
Stephen P. Owendoff 58 A Director
Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP
3300 BP America Building
300 Public Square
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-2301
Business Telephone: 216-621-0150
67
JEFFREY P. JACOBS became our Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chairman on
November 12, 1996 and became Chairman on December 31, 1997. From 1995 to
present, served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Jacobs Entertainment,
Inc., a company based in Cleveland, Ohio that has investments in gaming
companies and ventures, including Black Hawk and Colonial Holdings, Inc., which
operates a horse-racing track and satellite wagering facilities. Mr. Jacobs and
his father co-founded Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd. in 1996. Diversified
is owned equally by Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. and the Richard E. Jacobs
Revocable Trust. From 1975 to present, he has also served as President and
Chief Executive Officer of Jacobs Investments, Inc., a company engaged in the
development, construction and operation of residential and commercial real
estate projects in Ohio. He is also involved in a variety of private equity
transactions and investments. Mr. Jacobs also served in the Ohio House of
Representatives from 1982 until 1986. He is also Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Colonial Holdings, Inc. which is a reporting company under the
STEPHEN R. ROARK has been employed as Chief Financial Officer since August
1993. Mr. Roark became a director in 1994. He was elected as our President in
September 1995. Prior to that time he was an independent consultant in the
Denver area rendering financial and accounting assistance to companies in the
public marketplace. Mr. Roark has 17 years of public accounting experience
having served as a partner with a large local accounting firm and as a partner
with a national accounting firm. Mr. Roark was with Hanifen, Imhoff and
Prudential Securities, Inc. for three years and is a member of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Colorado Society of Certified
Public Accountants. Mr. Roark obtained his B.S.B.A. in Accounting from the
University of Denver in 1973.
STANLEY POLITANO has been our Vice President since August 1994 and was a
director from 1995 to 1996. He was appointed Secretary and Treasurer in April
1998. He received his B.S. degree in Business, majoring in finance, from the
University of Colorado in 1972. He has 22 years of experience in the securities
industry, working in both retail and wholesale capacities. He has worked for
Rauscher Pierce Securities Corporation and Prudential Securities, Inc. and was a
vice president with E.F. Hutton & Company, Inc. and Hanifen Imhoff Securities
Corporation. He has also served as Treasurer for Mission Corps International, a
non-profit organization.
FRANK B. DAY has been one of our directors since 1992. Mr. Day is Chairman
of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Rock Bottom Restaurants,
Inc., has been employed since January 1980 as President of Concept Restaurants,
Inc., and Managing General Partner of the Hotel Boulderado in Boulder, Colorado
since August 1982. Concept Restaurants, Inc. owns or operates 12 full service
restaurants in Colorado front range communities. From 1959 to present, Mr. Day
has owned and operated food service and hospitality facilities in Illinois,
Michigan, Wisconsin, and Colorado. He attended Harvard University from 1950 to
1956 and received B.A. and M.B.A. degrees. Mr. Day is also an active real estate
investor and is active in many civic and nonprofit organizations, having served
as a director of the Boulder Chamber of Commerce (September 1988 to September
1991) and Downtown Boulder, Inc. (from June 1987 to June 1990).
J. PATRICK McDUFF has served as a director and Chairman of our Audit
Committee since 1994 and has over 28 years of executive level management
experience in community and regional commercial banks. He also has extensive
experience in lending to companies in the hospitality and restaurant industries.
Mr. McDuff was instrumental in the formation of a community bank, Vectra Bank,
which became a publicly traded company. Subsequently that startup bank was sold
to Zion's Bancorporation. Mr. McDuff was also instrumental in the formation of
ClearSpring Pharmacy, LTD., which is a new retail concept that combines
traditional prescription pharmaceuticals with homeopathic medicines and non-
prescription drugs. Its first store opened in January of 2001. Mr. McDuff is
currently President of McDuff Interests, LLC, a business consulting firm that
specializes in financial management, marketing and sales and is also a direct
participant in various real estate development projects.
Mr. McDuff attended the University of Arkansas from 1966 to 1972 and
received a B.S.B.A. degree in Finance and Commercial Banking. Mr. McDuff is
active in many civic and non-profit organizations, having served as a director
of Boulder Center YMCA, Boulder Valley Rotary Club, and Longs Peak Council of
the Boy Scouts of America. Additionally, Mr. McDuff served as President of the
Boulder Valley Rotary Club.
68
ROBERT H. HUGHES has been one of our directors since November 12, 1996. Mr.
Hughes served as Chief Financial Officer of Jacobs Investments, Inc. from 1993
until May 1999 when he retired. Mr. Hughes was a partner in charge of the audit
department of the Cleveland office of the accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche
LLP until his retirement in 1991. Mr. Hughes serves as a member of the Board of
Directors of Colonial Holdings, Inc., a reporting company under the Exchange
Act.
TIMOTHY KNUDSEN was elected as one of our directors in February, 1998. Mr.
Knudsen has been associated with Knudsen, Gardner & Howe, a Cleveland, Ohio
based marketing communications agency for 21 years. He was elected President of
the agency in 1984. Mr. Knudsen holds a B.S. degree in Marketing from Dyke
Business College and has studied toward an advanced degree at Cleveland State
University.
STEPHEN P. OWENDOFF has been a director since May 2000. Mr. Owendoff is a
Partner in the Cleveland law firm of Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP. He has been a
partner in this firm since 1977, and prior to that was an associate. He heads
the Business Practice Area of this firm, and has a general corporate practice,
including public and private security offerings for issuers and underwriters,
acquisitions and sales of businesses, including branch acquisitions and
dispositions for financial institutions. He received his undergraduate degree
from Kent State University, Kent, Ohio and his law degree from Georgetown
University Law Center in Washington, D.C. Mr. Owendoff is active in many civic
and non-profit organizations in Cleveland, Ohio.
Gameco and BH Acquisition
Richard E. Jacobs and Jeffrey P. Jacobs comprise the Board of Directors of
Gameco and BH Acquisition. Jeffrey P. Jacobs serves as President, Vice
President, Secretary and Treasurer of both companies. After the Merger, Richard
E. Jacobs and Jeffrey P. Jacobs will comprise the Board of Directors of Black
Hawk. Jeffrey P. Jacobs will continue to serve as Black Hawk's Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer and Stephen R. Roark will serve as President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer. The resumes of Jeffrey P. Jacobs and Mr. Roark
are set forth above.
Richard E. Jacobs was Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Cleveland Indians Baseball Company, Inc. from its inception in 1998
to February 2000. From 1986 to 1998, Mr. Jacobs was Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Cleveland Baseball Corporation, which
previously served as the general partner of the partnership that now owns the
Cleveland Indians Baseball team. For many years Mr. Jacobs has been Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer of The Richard E. Jacobs Group Inc., a
real estate management and development company. Its business address is 25425
Center Ridge Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44145.
69
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This proxy statement contains or incorporates by reference certain forward-
looking statements and information relating to Black Hawk that are based on the
beliefs of management as well as assumptions made by and information currently
available to Black Hawk. Forward-looking statements include statements
concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance,
and underlying assumptions and other statements which are other than statements
of historical facts, including statements regarding the completion of the
proposed Merger. When used in this document, the words "anticipate," "believe,"
"estimate," "expect," "plan," "intend," "project," "predict," "may," and
"should" and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. Such statements reflect the current view of Black Hawk with respect
to future events, including the completion of the proposed Merger, and are
subject to numerous risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Many factors could
cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Black Hawk to be
materially different from any future results, performance or achievements that
may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including:
. delays in receiving required gaming, regulatory and other approvals;.
. the ability of Gameco to obtain funding necessary to consummate the
proposed Merger;
. the failure of shareholders to approve the Merger Agreement; intensity
of competition, particularly including the opening of new casinos by
competitors in Black Hawk's market area in 2000 and those to be opened
in 2001;
. adverse weather conditions;
. the possible expansion of gaming on Indian lands in California;
. levels of gaming activity in general and in Black Hawk, Colorado and
Reno, Nevada in particular;
. Black Hawk's ability to meet debt obligations; regulatory compliance
in both Colorado and Nevada;
. taxation levels;
. effects of national and regional economic and market conditions, labor
and marketing costs;
. Black Hawk's ability to integrate and operate its recent Reno, Nevada
acquisition and the ultimate outcome of litigation matters described
in Item 3 of Black Hawk's Annual Report on Form 10-K enclosed with
this proxy statement; and
. various other factors, otherwise referenced in this proxy statement
and the Appendices and Exhibits attached hereto.
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should
underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from
those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, planned or
intended. Black Hawk does not intend, or assume any obligation, to update these
forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or
changes in the factors affecting such forward-looking statements.
70
CERTAIN LITIGATION
On February 27, 2001, a shareholder of Black Hawk filed a purported
shareholder class action lawsuit against us and our directors in Colorado
District Court for the County of Gilpin under the caption Joseph Brecher v.
Timothy Knudsen, Robert H. Hughes, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Stephen R. Roark, J.
Patrick McDuff, Frank B. Day and Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc.,
Case No. 01CV13. The plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the price
offered by the Buyers is unconscionable, unfair and grossly inadequate, that
there is no adequate process to insure that shareholders will receive the
highest price attainable and that the defendants, acting in concert and
utilizing non-public information, are violating their fiduciary duties. The
plaintiff seeks preliminary and permanent injunctive relief restraining the
defendants from proceeding with the transaction described in this proxy
statement and unspecified compensatory or recissory damages, and, if such
transaction is consummated, rescinding the transaction, together with
unspecified compensatory or rescissory damages, and attorneys' fees and costs.
On March 1, 2001, another purported class action lawsuit was filed in the
Colorado District Court, County of Gilpin, under the caption Mary Bonsall v.
Black Hawk Gaming & Development Co. [sic], Inc.; Jeffrey P. Jacobs; Stephen R.
Roark; Frank B. Day; J. Patrick McDuff; Robert H. Hughes; Timothy Knudsen; and
Stephen P. Owendoff, Case No. 01-CV-16. The allegations in this case are
essentially the same as those described in the Brecher case above. The
plaintiff in this action also seeks preliminary and permanent injunctive relief
restraining the defendants from proceeding under the transaction described in
this proxy statement and, if such transaction is consummated, rescinding the
transaction, together with unspecified compensatory or rescissory damages, and
attorneys' and experts' fees and costs.
Our Board of Directors believes that it and the Special Committee it has
appointed have met and will continue to meet their respective fiduciary
obligations. We believe both suits are without merit and both will be
vigorously contested.
On May 25, 2001, a lawsuit was filed in The United States District Court
for the District of Colorado (Case No. 01-D-0964) by Central City, several
casino operators located in Central City and others against the City of Black
Hawk, the Black Hawk Casino Owners Association and several casino operators
located in Black Hawk, including Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc.,
and others. The suit alleges that the defendants caused economic harm to the
plaintiffs by engaging in a conspiracy and scheme to harm competition, restrain
trade and monopolize the gaming industry in the Gilpin County, Colorado market
in violation of federal and state constitutional law, statutory and common law.
The plaintiffs allege that the purpose of the Constitutional amendment
authorizing limited stakes gaming in Colorado was to promote the historical
preservation of Central City, Black Hawk and Cripple Creek, Colorado, but that
the City of Black Hawk encouraged and facilitated large Las Vegas style casinos.
Also, the complaint alleges that starting in 1996 the City of Black Hawk began
interfering in Central City's plans to construct a road directly from I-70 to
Central City (the "Southern Access"). It is further alleged that all the
defendants entered into a conspiracy in 1998 to block construction of the
Southern Access by purchasing four mining claims located within properties
sought to be annexed by Central City. Black Hawk believes the suit is without
merit and intends to vigorously defend it.
71
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP has served as Black Hawk's independent
auditors since 1991. The consolidated financial statements of Black Hawk for
each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2000 included in
Black Hawk's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000
enclosed with this proxy statement, have been audited by Deloitte & Touche as
stated in their reports appearing therein. It is expected that representatives
of Deloitte & Touche will be present at the Special Meeting, both to respond to
appropriate questions of shareholders of Black Hawk and to make a statement if
they so desire.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
See the financial statements for Black Hawk included in its Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and in its Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2001, both of which are
enclosed with this proxy statement.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
The SEC allows Black Hawk to "incorporate by reference" information into
this proxy statement, which means that Black Hawk can disclose important
information by referring you to another document filed separately with the SEC.
The following documents previously filed by Black Hawk with the SEC are
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement and are deemed to be a part
hereof:
(1) Black Hawk's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2000;
(2) Black Hawk's Current Reports on Form 8-K dated January 10, March 9,
March 19, March 22, March 26, April 16, April 27, May 5, and June 4,
2001;
(3) Black Hawk's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2001;
(4) Black Hawk's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2001; and
(5) Black Hawk's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2001.
Any statement contained in a document incorporated by reference herein
shall be deemed to be modified or superseded for all purposes to the extent that
a statement contained in this proxy statement modifies or replaces such
statement. The forward-looking statements made in the incorporated documents
are not protected by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements.
Black Hawk undertakes to provide by first class mail, without charge and
within one business day of receipt of any written or oral request, to any person
to whom a copy of this proxy statement has been delivered, a copy of any or all
of the documents referred to above which have been incorporated by reference in
this proxy statement, other than exhibits to such documents (unless such
exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference herein). Requests for such
copies should be directed to Corporate Secretary, Black Hawk Gaming &
Development Company, Inc., 240 Main Street, Black Hawk, Colorado 80224;
telephone number (303) 582-1117 (extension 7254).
OTHER BUSINESS
The Board does not know of any other matters to be presented for action at
the special meeting other than as set forth in this proxy statement. If any
other business should properly come before the special meeting, the persons
named in the enclosed proxy card intend to vote thereon in accordance with their
best judgment on the matter.
72
SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS AND PROPOSALS
Black Hawk has decided not to hold its 2001 annual meeting of shareholders,
which is generally held in the summer, because of the merger proposal described
in this proxy statement and the related special meeting of shareholders. If the
Merger is consummated, there will no longer be any unaffiliated shareholders of
Black Hawk and no public participation in any future meetings of shareholders.
However, if the Merger is not consummated, Black Hawk's unaffiliated
shareholders will continue to be entitled to attend and participate in Black
Hawk's shareholders' meetings. In such case, its next annual meeting would be
held in May or June 2002. Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act
promulgated by the SEC, any shareholder of Black Hawk who wished to present a
proposal at the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Black Hawk (in the event
the Merger is not consummated), and who wished to have such proposal included in
Black Hawk's proxy statement for that meeting, must have delivered a copy of
such proposal to Black Hawk at 240 Main Street, Black Hawk, Colorado 80422,
Attention: Corporate Secretary, so that it was received no later than January 9,
2001. Robert D. Greenlee has submitted such a proposal as described above under
"Special Factors--Background of the Merger." A shareholder proposal submitted
outside the Rule 14a-8 process will be considered untimely if not received by
Black Hawk within a reasonable time prior to the mailing of proxy material
relating to the annual meeting.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
No person is authorized to give any information or to make any
representations, other than as contained in this proxy statement, in connection
with the Merger Agreement or the Merger, and, if given or made, such information
or representations may not be relied upon as having been authorized by Black
Hawk, Gameco or BH Acquisition. The delivery of this proxy statement shall not,
under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in
the information set forth herein or in the affairs of Black Hawk since the date
hereof.
Because the Merger is a "going private" transaction, Gameco, BH
Acquisition, the Buyers and Black Hawk have filed with the SEC a Rule 13e-3
Transaction Statement on Schedule 13E-3 under the Exchange Act with respect to
the Merger. This proxy statement does not contain all of the information set
forth in the Schedule 13E-3 and the exhibits thereto. Copies of the Schedule
13E-3 and the exhibits thereto are available for inspection and copying at the
principal executive offices of Black Hawk during regular business hours by any
interested shareholder of Black Hawk, or a representative who has been so
designated in writing, and may be inspected and copied, or obtained by mail, by
written request directed to Corporate Secretary, Black Hawk Gaming & Development
Company, Inc., 240 Main Street, Black Hawk, Colorado 80224.
Black Hawk is currently subject to the information requirements of the
Exchange Act and in accordance therewith files periodic reports, proxy
statements and other information with the SEC relating to its business,
financial and other matters. Copies of such reports, proxy statements and other
information, as well as the Schedule 13E-3 and the exhibits thereto, may be
copied (at prescribed rates) at the public reference facilities maintained by
the SEC at:
. Room 1024, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Judiciary Plaza, Washington, D.C.
20549;
. 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661; and
For further information concerning the SEC's public reference rooms, you
may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Some of this information may also be
accessed on the World Wide Web through the SEC's Internet address at
"http://www.sec.gov." Black Hawk's common stock is listed on the Nasdaq
- -------------------
National Market (ticker symbol: BHWK), and materials may also be inspected at
Nasdaq's offices, 1735 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006.
73
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements of Gameco, Inc.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements are presented to show
the Gameco, Inc. financial statements after the impact of the transactions
described below. Unaffiliated shareholders of Black Hawk will not have an
interest in Gameco or any of the companies included in the pro forma information
regardless of whether they vote for or against the Merger unless the Merger is
not completed. The pro forma information may be helpful to unaffiliated Black
Hawk shareholders in assessing the benefits to Mr. Jacobs and the Buyers and
their ability to obtain financing for the Merger.
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of income for the year
ended December 31, 2000 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 and the
unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2001 give
effect to the following transactions:
The contribution of certain historical assets and liabilities of
Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd. into Gameco, Inc. Diversified
Opportunities' consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Colonial Holdings, Inc. since Diversified owns over 50% voting control of
Colonial's shares.
The contribution of the assets and liabilities of Jalou II, Inc. into
Gameco.
The acquisition of the publicly held shares of Colonial Holdings, Inc.
The acquisition of the publicly held shares of Black Hawk Gaming &
Development Company, Inc.
The acquisition of the Louisiana entities which occurred in February, 2001
by Diversified Opportunities, Jalou, LLC and Jalou II, Inc.
The acquisition of Gold Dust Casino, which occurred in January 2001 by
Black Hawk
The acquisition of certain other Louisiana entities which are considered
probable.
The completion of an assumed $115 million debt offering and an assumed $3
million capital contribution to be used to finance the acquisition of the
publicly held shares of Colonial and Black Hawk and to repay certain
existing debt.
All of the above acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. Accordingly, the results of Diversified Opportunities, Jalou II,
and Black Hawk for the period ended September 30, 2001 include the completed
Louisiana properties and Gold Dust, respectively from the date of acquisition.
The unaudited pro forma statements of income have been prepared assuming the
above transactions occurred on January 1, 2000. The unaudited pro forma balance
sheet as of September 30, 2001 has been prepared assuming the above transactions
occurred on such date.
The purchase method of accounting requires the aggregate purchase price to be
allocated to assets acquired based on their estimated fair value. For purposes
of the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements the allocation of
the purchase price is based on management's best estimate. The final allocation
of the purchase price for the assets acquired will be determined in a reasonable
time after the consummation of the transactions and will be based on a complete
evaluation of the assets acquired. Accordingly, the information presented
herein may differ from the final purchase price allocation; however, such
allocation is not expected to differ materially from the preliminary estimates.
For the Gold Dust and Jalou completed acquisitions, amortization expense has
been recorded for the goodwill arising from the acquisitions. As all other
acquisitions will occur after September 30, 2001, based on the Financial
Accounting Standards Board's rules for business combinations and amortization of
goodwill, no goodwill amortization has been presented in the pro forma financial
statements.
F-1
The unaudited pro forma financial statements of income do not include the impact
of nonrecurring charges or credits directly attributable to the transactions.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments have been made that are necessary
to present fairly the pro forma data. The unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the related notes. The
unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements are presented for
illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the results of
operations or financial position that would have been achieved had the
transactions reflected therein been consummated as of the date indicated, or of
the results of operations or financial position for any future periods.
F-2
GAMECO UNAUDITED PROFORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2000
Historical Historical
------------------------------------------- Results for
Diversified Black HawK Jalou Jalou Period Prior to
Opportunities (a) Gaming II (b) III (c) Acquisitions (d)
----------------- ------------ --------- ----------- -----------------
Net Revenues $ 30,708 $ 78,875 $ 12,901 $ 30,595 (4)
--------- -------- --------- ---------- --------- (7)
(9)
(10)
Costs and Expenses
Direct Expenses 22,052 34,693 9,644 12,592 (7)
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses 6,777 24,801 2,571 9,366 (4)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
Depreciation & Amortization 1,719 5,746 423 1,843 (1)
(5)
(9)
(10)
--------- -------- --------- ---------- ---------
Total Operating Expenses 30,548 65,240 12,638 23,801
Operating Income 160 13,635 263 6,794
(3)
(6)
Interest expense, net (3,104) (3,139) (466) (1,070) (9)
--------- -------- --------- ---------- ---------
Income before equity investments, minority
interest and income taxes (2,944) 10,496 (203) 5,724
Equity in earnings of investments 3,833 -- -- -- (4)
Minority interests 1,566 (2,059) -- -- (4)
--------- -------- --------- ---------- ---------
Income before income taxes 2,455 8,437 (203) 5,724
Income taxes -- (2,976) -- -- (2)
--------- -------- --------- ---------- ---------
Net income $ 2,455 $ 5,461 ($203) $ 5,724
Transaction Gameco
Adjustments Pro Forma
------------- -----------
Net Revenues ($1,453) $ 155,407
----------
4,156
(322)
(53)
Costs and Expenses
Direct Expenses 3,194 82,175
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (1,453) 40,113
(592)
(87)
(1,070)
(200)
Depreciation & Amortization 91 10,025
(323)
527
(1)
------- ---------
Total Operating Expenses 86 132,313
Operating Income 2,242 23,094
(9,993)
2,857
Interest expense, net (1,296) (16,211)
------- ---------
Income before equity investments, minority
interest and income taxes (6,190) 6,883
Equity in earnings of investments (3,833) --
Minority interests 493 --
------- ---------
Income before income taxes (9,530) 6,883
Income taxes 2,976 --
------- ---------
Net income ($6,554) $ 6,883
======= =========
___________________
(a) Includes the results of Colonial Holdings Inc.
(b) Includes the results of the Winners Choice truck plaza acquired by Messers.
Jacobs in February 2001.
(c) Includes the results of four Louisiana truck stop gaming properties to be
purchased.
(d) Includes the results of Gold Dust West acquired in January 2001 and Jalou
properties acquired in February 2001.
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
statements.
GAMECO UNAUDITED PROFORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (in thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001
Historical
Historical Results for
------------------------------------------------------
Diversified Black Hawk Jalou Jalou Period Prior to
Opportunities (a) Gaming II (b) III (c) Acquisitions (d)
----------------- ---------- --------- ---------- ----------------
Net Revenues $ 30,016 $ 73,618 $ 4,578 $ 14,878 $ 1,192 (4)
----------------- ---------- --------- ---------- ----------------
(7)
(10)
Costs and Expenses
Direct Expenses 19,982 32,019 3,203 9,183 648 (7)
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses 5,842 23,833 951 3,302 259 (4)
(10)
(11)
(12)
Depreciation & Amortization 1,713 5,725 149 620 22 (1)
(5)
(10)
Privatization and non-recurring expense 538 1,266 -- -- -- (8)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total Operating Expenses 28,075 62,843 4,303 13,105 929
Operating Income 1,941 10,775 275 1,773 263
(3)
Interest expense, net (2,831) (3,943) (285) (385) (31 (6)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before equity investments, minority
interest and income taxes (890) 6,832 (10) 1,388 232
Equity in earnings of investments 2,431 -- -- -- -- (4)
Minority interests 705 (1,458) -- -- -- (4)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before income taxes 2,246 5,374 (10) 1,388 232
Income taxes -- (2,366) -- -- -- (2)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net income $ 2,246 $ 3,008 ($ 10) $ 1,388 $ 232
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Transaction Gameco
Adjustments Pro Forma
----------- ---------
Net Revenues ($ 1,581) $ 126,428
---------
3,778
(51)
Costs and Expenses
Direct Expenses 2,914 67,949
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (1,581) 31,301
(105)
(1,050)
(150)
Depreciation & Amortization 68 8,053
(242)
(2)
Privatization and non-recurring expense (1,804) --
--------- ---------
Total Operating Expenses (1,952) 107,303
Operating Income 4,098 19,125
(6,568)
Interest expense, net 1,743 (12,300)
--------- ---------
Income before equity investments, minority
interest and income taxes (727) 6,825
Equity in earnings of investments (2,431) --
Minority interests 753 --
--------- ---------
Income before income taxes (2,405) 6,825
Income taxes 2,366 --
--------- --------
Net income ($ 39) $ 6,825
========= ========
__________________________________
(a) Includes the results of Colonial Holdings Inc. for all periods and of the
Jalou properties since the date acquisition.
(b) Includes the results of the Winners Choice truck plaza owned by Messers.
Jacobs since the date of acquisition.
(c) Includes the results of four Louisiana truck stop gaming properties to be
purchased.
(d) Includes the results of the Jalou and Jalou II properties prior to their
Feb. 8, 2001 acquisitions by Diversified and Messers Jacobs, respectively.
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma consolidated statement.
F-4
GAMECO UNAUDITED PROFORMA CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (in thousands)
September 30, 2001
Diversified Black Hawk
Opportunities (a) Gaming Jalou II (b) Jalou III (c)
------------------- ------------ -------------- ---------------
Assets
Current
Cash and equivalents $ 3,996 $ 14,313 $ 462 $ 1,150 (1)
(3)
Net income (10)
(2)
Other 4,992 2,775 320 1,155 (10)
--------- --------- -------- --------
8,988 17,088 782 2,305
--------- --------- -------- --------
Property and equipment, net 65,034 88,006 3,248 9,062 (1)
--------- --------- -------- --------
(5)
(10)
Other assets
Goodwill, net 10,580 19,382 963 410 (1)
(5)
(10)
Investments 20,222 - - - (4)
(10)
(2)
Other 737 4,058 - - (3)
--------- --------- -------- --------
31,539 23,440 963 410
--------- --------- -------- --------
Total assets $ 105,561 $ 128,534 $ 4,993 $ 11,777
========= ========= ======== ========
Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 8,427 $ 10,191 $ 393 $ 346 (1)
(10)
Advances from affiliates - - - 4,279 (1)
Notes payable - related parties, current 21,452 - 11 - (6)
Current maturities of long-term debt 836 375 - 960 (1)
--------- --------- -------- --------
30,715 10,566 404 5,585
--------- --------- -------- --------
Long-term liabilities
Long-term debt 4,543 63,908 1,209 5,656 (1)
(1)
(3)
(3)
(5)
(5)
Notes payable - related parties 19,271 - 2,285 - (6)
Other liability - 2,989 - - (2)
--------- --------- -------- --------
23,814 66,897 3,494 5,656
--------- --------- -------- --------
Total Liabilities 54,529 77,463 3,898 11,241
--------- --------- -------- --------
Minority interests 17,862 7,242 - - (4)
--------- --------- -------- --------
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Equity 33,170 43,829 1,095 536 (10)
--------- --------- -------- --------
Total liabilities and equity $ 105,561 $ 128,534 $ 4,993 $ 11,777
========= ========= ======== ========
Proforma Gameco
Adjustments Consolidated
------------- --------------
Assets
Current
Cash and equivalents $ (550) $ 15,852
(2,584)
(935)
(440)
Other (363) 8,439
--------- ----------
(4,872) 24,291
--------- ----------
Property and equipment, net 1,812 153,739
----------
(12,920)
(503)
Other assets
Goodwill, net 5,121 42,247
5,806
(15)
Investments (19,899) -
(323)
(873)
Other 7,000 10,922
--------- ----------
(3,183) 53,169
--------- ----------
Total assets $ (19,666) $ 231,199
========= ==========
Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ (346) 18,441
(570)
Advances from affiliates (4,279) -
Notes payable - related parties, current (21,419) 44
Current maturities of long-term debt (960) 1,211
--------- ----------
(27,574) 19,696
--------- ----------
Long-term liabilities
Long-term debt (5,656) 130,968
18,160
(5,572)
7,000
36,980
4,740
Notes payable - related parties (12,600) 8,956
Other liability (814) 2,175
--------- ----------
42,238 142,099
--------- ----------
Total Liabilities 14,664 161,795
--------- ----------
Minority interests (25,104) -
(536)
(499)
3,000
199
(43,829)
34,008
Equity (1,569) 69,404
--------- ----------
Total liabilities and equity $ (19,666) $ 231,199
========= ==========
F-5
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------
(1) To record probable acquisitions of the assets of Jalou video poker truck
stops which include the following four entities:
Jace, Inc., Lucky Magnolia Truck Stop and Casino, Bayou Vista Truck Plaza
and Casino, LLC and Raceland Truck Plaza and Casino, LLC
$18.1 million purchase price, estimated $1.8 million write-up of fixed
assets to fair value. Excess of purchase price over fair value of assets
acquired of $5.1 million allocated to non-amortizing goodwill. Debt of
$18.1 million incurred to fund the acquisition. Pro forma adjustments to
record the acquisition are as follows (in thousands):
Reduce cash to amount acquired $ (550)
Eliminate liabilities not assumed 11,241
Estimated fair value of fixed assets in
excess of book value 1,812
Record goodwill 5,121
Record acquisition debt (18,160)
Eliminate existing equity (536)
Additional depreciation expense of $91,000 and $68,000 recorded for the
year ended December 31, 2000 and the nine months ended September 30, 2001,
respectively, due to the write-up of fixed assets.
(2) Eliminate deferred income taxes and tax expense as Gameco, Inc will be a
Subchapter "S" corporation and therefore its owners will be liable for
the taxes on their share of the corporation's taxable income.
(3) Eliminate refinanced debt, record new funding and classify current
maturities of new funding, including estimated additional interest expense
(in millions):
New funding:
Principal Balance Interest Rate
----------------- -------------
Capital contribution $ 3.00
========
Bonds $115.000 11.50%
Claude Penn notes (probable acquisitions) 5.10 8.50
--------
Total new debt 120.10
--------
Existing funding which will not be refinanced:
Notes payable to affiliates 9.00 12.00
Black Hawk bonds 5.48 6.70
Claude Penn Notes (prior acquisitions) 4.74 8.00
Maryland Jockey Club and other 1.85 7.75
--------
Total pro forma debt outstanding $ 141.17
========
F-6
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------
(3) cont. Estimated uses of new funding are as follows (in millions):
Total new funding (capital contribution and debt proceeds) $ 123.10
Less:
Pay-off Black Hawk line of credit (58.80)
Purchase of Black Hawk shares (Note 5) (36.98)
Purchase of Colonial shares (Note 5) (4.74)
Proposed Jalou acquisitions (Note 1) (18.16)
Debt issuance costs (7.00)
---------
Net existing cash utilized $ (2.58)
=========
Debt issuance costs will be amortized to interest expense over the term of
the new bonds (seven years).
(4) Eliminate intercompany investments, minority interest, earnings and
management fees.
(5) Record acquisition of unowned Colonial Holdings and Black Hawk Gaming
shares summarized as follows (in millions):
Black Hawk
Gaming &
Colonial Holdings Development
Purchase price $ 4.74 $36.98
Diversified Opportunities Group
existing investment balance 13.66 12.66
------ ------
Total investment 18.40 49.64
Net assets acquired 31.32 43.83
------ ------
Excess (deficiency) of total investment
over net assets acquired $(12.92) $ 5.81
====== ======
Excess of total investment for Black Hawk is allocated to non-amortizing
goodwill and deficiency for Colonial Holdings is allocated to property and
equipment (also results in reduction of depreciation expense of $242,000
for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, and $323,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2000 and the twelve months ended September 30, 2001).
(6) To eliminate related party debt not assumed by Gameco of approximately $34
million, and eliminate the related interest expense of approximately
$1,743,000, $2,857,000, and $2,714,000 for the nine months ended September
30, 2001, the year ended December 31, 2000, and the twelve months ended
September 30, 2001, respectively.
F-7
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------
(7) To eliminate third party management contracts related to the truck stops
that will be cancelled upon the acquisitions, and record expense that will
be incurred to perform the services provided under the cancelled contracts
as well as reclass state gaming taxes which had been netted against gaming
revenue under the former contracts.
(8) Elimination of privatization and other non-recurring costs.
(9) Gold Dust West pro forma acquisition and adjustments for the period prior
to the January 4, 2001 acquisition as follows:
(a) Elimination of lease payments and rent paid to the sole stockholder
under leasehold property rights and other leases. The title to the
leased and rented property owned by the sole stockholder transferred
to the new owner at closing.
(b) Elimination of various expense allowances and salaries paid on behalf
of the sole stockholder.
(c) Adjustment to depreciation of gaming facilities and amortization of
goodwill and debt issue costs based on the allocation of the purchase
price with assumed useful lives of 39 years for the building and
improvements, 5 years for the furniture, fixture, and equipment, and
15 years for the intangible assets, and forty months for the debt
issue costs.
(d) Elimination of interest income associated with a note receivable from
sole stockholder not assumed in the purchase.
(e) Adjustment to interest expense on borrowings from the Bank Credit
Facility net of interest expense related to Gold Dust Motel, Inc. debt
not assumed by the Company at an effective rate of 8.375%.
(10) Eliminate assets, liabilities and certain operations held by Diversified
Opportunities that will not be contributed to Gameco.
(11) Remove Diversified Opportunities business developmental expenses as this
function will no longer be performed through Gameco.
(12) Remove redundant corporate overhead (i.e., investor relations function)
estimated at $200,000 annually.
F-8
ANNEX A
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
----------------------------
DATED AS OF
April 25, 2001
--------------
AMONG
BLACK HAWK GAMING & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.,
GAMECO, INC.
AND
BH ACQUISITION, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
-------------------
Page
ARTICLE I THE MERGER; CLOSING............................................................................ 1
Section 1.01. The Merger................................................................................. 1
Section 1.02. Effective Time............................................................................. 1
Section 1.03. Effects of the Merger...................................................................... 1
Section 1.04. Conversion of Shares....................................................................... 1
Section 1.05. Payment of Shares.......................................................................... 2
Section 1.06. Stock Options.............................................................................. 3
Section 1.07. The Closing................................................................................ 4
Section 1.08. Dissenters' Rights......................................................................... 4
ARTICLE II THE SURVIVING CORPORATION; DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.............................................. 4
Section 2.01. Articles of Incorporation.................................................................. 4
Section 2.02. Bylaws..................................................................................... 4
Section 2.03. Directors and Officers..................................................................... 4
ARTICLE III REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER SUBSIDIARY................................. 4
Section 3.01. Organization and Qualification............................................................. 4
Section 3.02. Authority; Non-Contravention; Approvals.................................................... 5
Section 3.03. Proxy Statement and Other SEC Filings...................................................... 6
ARTICLE IV REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY.................................................. 6
Section 4.01. Organization and Qualification............................................................. 6
Section 4.02. Capitalization............................................................................. 7
Section 4.03. Subsidiaries............................................................................... 7
Section 4.04. Authority; Non-Contravention; Approvals.................................................... 8
Section 4.05. Reports and Financial Statements........................................................... 9
Section 4.06. Absence of Undisclosed Liabilities......................................................... 9
Section 4.07. Absence of Certain Changes or Events....................................................... 9
Section 4.08. Litigation................................................................................. 9
Section 4.09. Proxy Statement and Other SEC Filings. 9
Section 4.10. No Violation of Law........................................................................ 10
Section 4.11. Compliance with Agreements................................................................. 10
Section 4.12. Taxes...................................................................................... 10
Section 4.13. Employee Benefit Plans; ERISA.............................................................. 11
Section 4.14. Labor Controversies........................................................................ 12
Section 4.15. Environmental Matters...................................................................... 12
Section 4.16. Title to Assets............................................................................ 13
Section 4.17. Company Stockholders' Approval............................................................. 13
Section 4.18. Brokers and Finders........................................................................ 13
-i-
Page
ARTICLE V COVENANTS................................................................................... 14
Section 5.01. Conduct of Business by the Company Pending the Merger................................... 14
Section 5.02. Control of the Company's Operations..................................................... 15
Section 5.03. Acquisition Transactions................................................................ 15
Section 5.04. Access to Information................................................................... 16
Section 5.05. Notices of Certain Events............................................................... 16
Section 5.06. Meeting of the Company's Stockholders................................................... 17
Section 5.07. Proxy Statement and Other SEC Filings................................................... 17
Section 5.08. Public Announcements.................................................................... 18
Section 5.09. Expenses and Fees....................................................................... 18
Section 5.10. Agreement to Cooperate.................................................................. 18
Section 5.11. Directors' and Officers' Indemnification................................................ 19
Section 5.12. Financing............................................................................... 21
Section 5.13. Parent Letter of Credit................................................................. 21
ARTICLE VI CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER.................................................................... 21
Section 6.01. Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party............................................. 21
Section 6.02. Conditions to Obligation of the Company to Effect the Merger............................ 22
Section 6.03. Conditions to Obligations of Parent and Subsidiary to Effect the Merger................. 22
ARTICLE VII TERMINATION................................................................................. 23
Section 7.01. Termination............................................................................. 23
ARTICLE VIII MISCELLANEOUS............................................................................... 24
Section 8.01. Effect of Termination................................................................... 24
Section 8.02. Nonsurvival of Representations and Warranties........................................... 24
Section 8.03. Notices................................................................................. 24
Section 8.04. Interpretation.......................................................................... 25
Section 8.05. Miscellaneous........................................................................... 25
Section 8.06. Counterparts............................................................................ 25
Section 8.07. Amendments; No Waivers.................................................................. 25
Section 8.08. Entire Agreement........................................................................ 26
Section 8.09. Severability............................................................................ 26
Section 8.10. Specific Performance.................................................................... 26
-ii-
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
This AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this "Agreement") is entered into as of
April 25, 2001 by and among Gameco, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Parent"), BH
Acquisition, Inc., a Colorado corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Parent
("Merger Subsidiary"), and Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc., a
Colorado corporation (the "Company"). Parent, Merger Subsidiary and the Company
are referred to collectively herein as the "Parties."
WHEREAS, the respective Boards of Directors of Parent, Merger Subsidiary
and the Company have each approved the merger of Merger Subsidiary with and into
the Company on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this
Agreement (the "Merger");
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the respective
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth herein, the
parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
THE MERGER; CLOSING
Section 1.01. The Merger. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of
----------
this Agreement, and in accordance with the Colorado Business Corporation Act,
Articles 101 to 117 of Title 7 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (the "CBCA"),
Merger Subsidiary shall be merged with and into the Company at the Effective
Time (as defined in Section 1.02). Following the Merger, the separate existence
of Merger Subsidiary shall cease and the Company shall continue as the surviving
corporation (the "Surviving Corporation") and a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Parent, and shall succeed to and assume all the rights and obligations of Merger
Subsidiary in accordance with the CBCA.
Section 1.02. Effective Time. The Merger shall become effective when
--------------
articles of merger (the "Articles of Merger"), executed in accordance with the
relevant provisions of the CBCA, are filed with the Secretary of State of the
State of Colorado; provided, however, that, upon mutual consent of the
constituent corporations to the Merger, the Articles of Merger may provide for a
later date of effectiveness of the Merger not more than 30 days after the date
the Articles of Merger are filed. When used in this Agreement, the term
"Effective Time" shall mean the date and time at which the Articles of Merger
are accepted for record or such later time established by the Articles of
Merger. The filing of the Articles of Merger shall be made on the date of the
Closing (as defined in Section 1.07).
Section 1.03. Effects of the Merger. The Merger shall have the effects
---------------------
set forth in Section 7-111-106 of the Colorado Revised Statutes.
Section 1.04. Conversion of Shares. At the Effective Time, by virtue of
--------------------
the Merger and without any action on the part of Parent, Merger Subsidiary, the
Company or the holders of any of the following securities:
(a) each issued and outstanding share of the Company's common stock, par
value $.001 per share ("Company Common Stock"), held by the Company as treasury
stock and each issued and outstanding share of Company Common Stock owned by any
subsidiary of the Company, Parent, Merger Subsidiary or any other subsidiary of
Parent shall be canceled and retired and shall cease to exist, and no payment or
consideration shall be made with respect thereto;
(b) each issued and outstanding share of Company Common Stock, other than
shares of Company Common Stock referred to in paragraph (a) above, shall be
converted into the right to receive an amount in cash, without interest, equal
to $12.00 (the "Merger Consideration"). At the Effective Time, all such shares
of Company Common Stock shall no longer be outstanding and shall automatically
be canceled and retired and shall cease to exist, and each holder of a
certificate representing any such shares of Company Common Stock shall cease to
have any rights with respect thereto, except the right to receive the Merger
Consideration, without interest; and
(c) each issued and outstanding share of capital stock or ownership
interest of Merger Subsidiary shall be converted into one fully paid and
nonassessable share of common stock, par value $.001 per share, of the Surviving
Corporation.
Section 1.05. Payment of Shares. (a) Prior to the Effective Time, Parent
shall appoint a bank or trust company reasonably satisfactory to the Company to
act as disbursing agent (the "Disbursing Agent") for the payment of Merger
Consideration upon surrender of certificates representing the shares of Company
Common Stock. Parent will enter into a disbursing agent agreement with the
Disbursing Agent, in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the Company. At
or prior to the Effective Time, Parent shall deposit or cause to be deposited
with the Disbursing Agent in trust for the benefit of the Company's stockholders
cash in an aggregate amount necessary to make the payments pursuant to Section
1.04 to holders of shares of Company Common Stock (such amounts being
hereinafter referred to as the "Exchange Fund"). The Disbursing Agent shall
invest the Exchange Fund, as the Surviving Corporation directs, in direct
obligations of the United States of America, obligations for which the full
faith and credit of the United States of America is pledged to provide for the
payment of all principal and interest or commercial paper obligations receiving
the highest rating from either Moody's Investors Service, Inc. or Standard &
Poor's, a division of The McGraw Hill Companies, or a combination thereof,
provided that, in any such case, no such instrument shall have a maturity
exceeding three months. Any net profit resulting from, or interest or income
produced by, such investments shall be payable to the Surviving Corporation. The
Exchange Fund shall be used only as provided in this Agreement.
(b) Promptly (but no later than five days) after the Effective Time, the
Surviving Corporation shall cause the Disbursing Agent to mail to each person
who was a record holder as of the Effective Time of an outstanding certificate
or certificates which immediately prior to the Effective Time represented shares
of Company Common Stock (the "Certificates"), and whose shares were converted
into the right to receive Merger Consideration pursuant to Section 1.04(b), a
form of letter of transmittal (which shall specify that delivery shall be
effected, and risk of loss and title to the Certificates shall pass, only upon
proper delivery of the Certificates to the Disbursing Agent) and instructions
for use in effecting the surrender of the Certificates in exchange for payment
of the Merger Consideration. Upon surrender to the Disbursing Agent of a
Certificate, together with such letter of transmittal duly executed and such
other documents as may be reasonably required by the Disbursing Agent, the
holder of such Certificate shall be paid promptly in exchange therefor cash in
an amount equal to the product of the number of shares of Company Common Stock
represented by such Certificate multiplied by the Merger Consideration, and such
Certificate shall forthwith be canceled. No interest will be paid or accrue on
the cash payable upon the surrender of the Certificates. If payment is to be
made to a person other than the person in whose name the Certificate surrendered
is registered, it shall be a condition of payment that the Certificate so
surrendered be properly endorsed or otherwise be in proper form for transfer and
that the person requesting such payment pay any transfer or other taxes required
by reason of the payment to a person other than the registered holder of the
Certificate surrendered or establish to the satisfaction of the Surviving
Corporation that such tax has been paid or is not applicable. Until surrendered
in accordance with this Section 1.05, each Certificate (other than Certificates
representing shares of Company Common Stock owned by any subsidiary of the
Company, Parent, Merger Subsidiary or any other subsidiary of Parent and shares
of Company Common Stock held in the treasury of the Company, which have been
canceled) shall represent for all purposes only the right to receive the Merger
Consideration in cash multiplied by the number of shares of Company Common Stock
evidenced by such Certificate, without any interest thereon.
(c) From and after the Effective Time, there shall be no registration of
transfers of shares of Company Common Stock which were outstanding immediately
prior to the Effective Time on the stock transfer books of the Surviving
Corporation. From and after the Effective Time, the holders of shares of Company
Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall cease to
have any rights with respect to such shares of Company Common Stock except as
otherwise provided in this Agreement or by applicable law. All cash paid upon
the surrender of Certificates in accordance with this Article I shall be deemed
to have been paid in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to the shares of
Company Common Stock previously represented by such Certificates. If, after the
Effective Time, Certificates are presented to the Surviving Corporation for any
reason, such Certificates shall be canceled and exchanged for cash as provided
in this Article I. At the close of business on the day of the Effective Time the
stock ledger of the Company shall be closed.
-2-
(d) At any time more than 365 days after the Effective Time, the Surviving
Corporation shall be entitled to require the Disbursing Agent to deliver to it
any funds which had been made available to the Disbursing Agent and not
disbursed in exchange for Certificates (including, without limitation, all
interest and other income received by the Disbursing Agent in respect of all
such funds). Thereafter, holders of shares of Company Common Stock shall look
only to the Surviving Corporation (subject to the terms of this Agreement,
abandoned property, escheat and other similar laws) as general creditors thereof
with respect to any Merger Consideration that may be payable, without interest,
upon due surrender of the Certificates held by them. If any Certificates shall
not have been surrendered prior to five years after the Effective Time (or
immediately prior to such time on which any payment in respect hereof would
otherwise escheat or become the property of any governmental unit or agency),
the payment in respect of such Certificates shall, to the extent permitted by
applicable law, become the property of the Surviving Corporation, free and clear
of all claims or interest of any person previously entitled thereto.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of Parent, the Company, the Surviving
Corporation nor the Disbursing Agent shall be liable to any holder of a share of
Company Common Stock for any Merger Consideration in respect of such share of
Company Common Stock delivered to a public official pursuant to any abandoned
property, escheat or other similar law.
(e) If any Certificate has been lost, stolen, or destroyed, upon the
making of an affidavit of that fact by the person claiming such Certificate to
be lost, stolen, or destroyed and, if required by the Surviving Corporation, the
posting by such person of a bond in such reasonable amount as the Surviving
Corporation may direct as indemnity against any claim that may be made against
the Surviving Corporation with respect to such Certificate, the Disbursing Agent
will deliver in exchange for such lost, stolen, or destroyed Certificate, the
appropriate Merger Consideration with respect to the shares of Company Common
Stock formerly represented by that Certificate.
(f) The Surviving Corporation or the Disbursing Agent, as the case may be,
may deduct and withhold from the consideration otherwise payable pursuant to
this Agreement to any holder of shares of Company Common Stock such amounts as
the Surviving Corporation or the Disbursing Agent, as the case may be, may be
required to deduct and withhold with respect to the making of any such payment
under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or any provision of state,
local, or foreign tax law, including without limitation withholdings required in
connection with payments under Section 1.06. To the extent withheld by the
Surviving Corporation or the Disbursing Agent, such withheld amounts shall be
treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having been paid to the holders of
the shares of Company Common Stock in respect of which such deduction and
withholding was made.
Section 1.06. Stock Options. At the Effective Time, each unexercised
-------------
option, whether or not then vested or exercisable in accordance with its terms,
to purchase shares of Company Common Stock (the "Options") previously granted by
the Company or any of its subsidiaries shall be canceled automatically and the
Parent shall or shall cause the Surviving Corporation to provide the holder
thereof with a lump sum cash payment equal to the product of (i) the total
number of shares of Company Common Stock subject to such Option immediately
prior to the Effective Time and (ii) the excess (if any) of the Merger
Consideration over the exercise price per share of Company Common Stock subject
to such Option.
Section 1.07. The Closing. The closing of the transactions contemplated
------------
by this Agreement (the "Closing") shall take place at the executive offices of
the Company in Denver, Colorado, commencing at 9:00 a.m. local time on the
second business day following the satisfaction or waiver of all conditions to
the obligations of the Parties to consummate the transactions contemplated
hereby (other than conditions with respect to actions the Parties will take at
the Closing) or such other place and date as the Parties may mutually determine
(the "Closing Date").
Section 1.08. Dissenters' Rights. Notwithstanding anything in this
------------------
Agreement to the contrary, shares of Company Common Stock outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time and held by a holder who has not voted
in favor of the Merger and who has dissented from the Merger in accordance with
Article 113 of the CBCA ("Dissenting Shares") shall not be converted into the
right to receive the Merger Consideration as provided in Section 1.04(b), unless
and until such holder fails to perfect or withdraws or otherwise loses his right
to payment under the CBCA. If, after the Effective Time, any such holder fails
to perfect or withdraws or loses his right to such payment, such Dissenting
Shares shall thereupon be treated as if they had been converted as of the
Effective Time into the right to receive the Merger Consideration, if any, to
which such holder is entitled, without interest thereon. The Company shall give
Parent and Merger Subsidiary prompt notice of any notice of dissent received by
Company
-3-
and, prior to the Effective Time, Parent and Merger Subsidiary shall have the
right to participate in all negotiations and proceedings with respect to such
dissents. Prior to the Effective Time, Company shall not, except with the prior
written consent of Parent and Merger Subsidiary, make any payment with respect
to, or settle or offer to settle, any such dissents.
ARTICLE II
THE SURVIVING CORPORATION; DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
-------------------------------------------------
Section 2.01. Articles of Incorporation. The Articles of Incorporation of
--------------------------
the Company in effect at the Effective Time shall be the articles of
incorporation of the Surviving Corporation until amended in accordance with
applicable law and this Agreement.
Section 2.02. Bylaws. The bylaws of Merger Subsidiary in effect at the
-------
Effective Time shall be the bylaws of the Surviving Corporation, until amended
in accordance with applicable law and this Agreement.
Section 2.03. Directors and Officers. The directors of Merger Subsidiary
------------------------
immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the directors of the Surviving
Corporation as of the Effective Time. The officers of the Company shall be the
officers of the Surviving Corporation as of the Effective Time, subject to the
right of the Board of Directors of the Surviving Corporation to appoint or
replace officers.
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER SUBSIDIARY
Parent and Merger Subsidiary jointly and severally represent and warrant to
the Company that, except as set forth in the Disclosure Schedule dated as of the
date hereof and signed by an authorized officer of Parent (the "Parent
Disclosure Schedule"), it being agreed that disclosure of any item on the Parent
Disclosure Schedule shall be deemed disclosure with respect to all Sections of
this Agreement if the relevance of such item is reasonably apparent from the
face of the Parent Disclosure Schedule:
Section 3.01. Organization and Qualification. Parent is a corporation and
--------------------------------
Merger Subsidiary is a corporation, in each case duly organized, validly
existing and in good standing under the laws of the state of its incorporation
and has the requisite corporate power and authority to own, lease and operate
its assets and properties and to carry on its business as it is now being
conducted. Each of Parent and Merger Subsidiary is qualified to transact
business and is in good standing in each jurisdiction in which the properties
owned, leased or operated by it or the nature of the business conducted by it
makes such qualification necessary, except where the failure to be so qualified
and in good standing would not reasonably be expected to have Parent Material
Adverse Effect. In this Agreement, the term "Parent Material Adverse Effect"
means an effect that is materially adverse to (i) the business, financial
condition or ongoing operations of Parent and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole
or (ii) the ability of Parent or any of its subsidiaries to obtain financing for
or to consummate any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 3.02. Authority; Non-Contravention; Approvals. (a) Each of Parent
----------------------------------------
and Merger Subsidiary has full corporate power and authority to enter into this
Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, including
without limitation, the consummation of the financing of the Merger pursuant to
the Financing Arrangement (as defined in Section 3.04) (the "Financing"). This
Agreement and the Merger have been approved and adopted by the Boards of
Directors of Parent and Merger Subsidiary and Parent as the sole stockholder of
Merger Subsidiary, and no other corporate or similar proceeding on the part of
Parent or Merger Subsidiary is necessary to authorize the execution and delivery
of this Agreement or the consummation by Parent and Merger Subsidiary of the
transactions contemplated hereby, including without limitation, the Financing.
This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by each of Parent and Merger
Subsidiary and, assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery hereof by
the Company, constitutes a valid and legally binding agreement of each of Parent
and Merger Subsidiary enforceable against each of them in accordance with its
terms, except that such enforcement may be subject to (i) bankruptcy,
insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws affecting or
relating to enforcement of creditors' rights generally and (ii) general
equitable principles.
-4-
(b) The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by each of
Parent and Merger Subsidiary and the consummation of the Merger and the
transactions contemplated hereby, including without limitation the Financing, do
not and will not violate, conflict with or result in a breach of any provision
of, or constitute a default (or an event which, with notice or lapse of time or
both, would constitute a default) under, or result in the termination of, or
accelerate the performance required by, or result in a right of termination or
acceleration under, or result in the creation of any lien, security interest or
encumbrance upon any of the properties or assets of Parent or any of its
subsidiaries under any of the terms, conditions or provisions of (i) the
respective certificates of incorporation or bylaws of Parent or any of its
subsidiaries, (ii) any statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, judgment,
decree, order, injunction, writ, permit or license of any court or governmental
authority applicable to Parent or any of its subsidiaries or any of their
respective properties or assets, subject, in the case of consummation, to
obtaining (prior to the Effective Time) the Parent Required Statutory Approvals
(as defined in Section 3.02(c)), or (iii) any note, bond, mortgage, indenture,
deed of trust, license, franchise, permit, concession, contract, lease or other
instrument, obligation or agreement of any kind (each a "Contract" and
collectively "Contracts") to which Parent or any of its subsidiaries is now a
party or by which Parent or any of its subsidiaries or any of their respective
properties or assets may be bound or affected, except, with respect to any item
referred to in clause (ii) or (iii), for any such violation, conflict, breach,
default, termination, acceleration or creation of liens, security interests or
encumbrances that would not reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material
Adverse Effect and would not materially delay the consummation of the Merger.
(c) Except for (i) the filings by Parent required by the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the "HSR Act"), if any, (ii)
applicable filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC")
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), (iii) filing of Articles of Merger with the Secretary of State of the
State of Colorado in connection with the Merger, and (iv) filings with and
approvals by any regulatory authority with jurisdiction over the Company's,
Parent's or any Parent affiliate's gaming operations required under any Federal,
state, local or foreign statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, permit, consent,
approval, license, judgment, order, decree, injunction or other authorization
governing or relating to the current or contemplated casino and gaming
activities and operations of the Company, Parent or any Parent affiliate,
including the Nevada Gaming Control Act and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder, and the Colorado Limited Gaming Act and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder and all other rules and regulations, statutes
and ordinances having authority or with which compliance is required for the
conduct of gambling, gaming and casino activities (collectively, the "Gaming
Laws") (the filings and approvals referred to in clauses (i) through (iv) being
collectively referred to as the "Parent Required Statutory Approvals"), no
declaration, filing or registration with, or notice to, or authorization,
consent or approval of, any governmental or regulatory body or authority is
necessary for the execution and delivery of this Agreement by Parent or Merger
Subsidiary, or the consummation by Parent or Merger Subsidiary of the
transactions contemplated hereby, including without limitation, the Financing,
other than such declarations, filings, registrations, notices, authorizations,
consents or approvals which, if not made or obtained, as the case may be, would
not reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material Adverse Effect and would
not materially delay the consummation of the Merger.
Section 3.03. Proxy Statement and Other SEC Filings. None of the
--------------------------------------
information supplied by Parent or its subsidiaries for inclusion in (i) any
proxy statement to be distributed in connection with the Company's meeting of
stockholders to vote upon this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby (the "Proxy Statement"), at the time of the mailing of the Proxy
Statement and any amendments or supplements thereto, or at the time of the
meeting of stockholders of the Company to be held in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or (ii) the Schedule 13E-3 with
respect to the transactions contemplated hereby (the "Transaction Statement") at
the time of the filing thereof with the SEC or at any time the Transaction
Statement is amended or supplemented, will contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein
or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the
circumstances under which they are made, not misleading.
Section 3.04. Brokers and Finders. Except as disclosed in the Parent
--------------------
Disclosure Schedule, Parent has not entered into any contract, arrangement or
understanding with any person or firm which may result in the obligation of the
Company to pay any investment banking fees, finder's fees or brokerage fees in
connection with the transactions contemplated hereby.
-5-
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
The Company represents and warrants to Parent and Merger Subsidiary that,
except as set forth in the disclosure schedule dated as of the date hereof and
signed by an authorized officer of the Company (the "Company Disclosure
Schedule"), it being agreed that disclosure of any item on the Company
Disclosure Schedule shall be deemed disclosure with respect to all Sections of
this Agreement if the relevance of such item is reasonably apparent from the
face of the Company Disclosure Schedule:
Section 4.01. Organization and Qualification. The Company is a
-------------------------------
corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws
of the State of Colorado and has the requisite corporate power and authority to
own, lease and operate its assets and properties and to carry on its business as
it is now being conducted. The Company is qualified to transact business and is
in good standing in each jurisdiction in which the properties owned, leased or
operated by it or the nature of the business conducted by it makes such
qualification necessary, except where the failure to be so qualified and in good
standing would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse
Effect. In this Agreement, the term "Company Material Adverse Effect" means an
effect that is materially adverse to (i) the business, financial condition or
ongoing operations of the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole or (ii)
the ability of the Company to consummate any of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement or the ability of the Parties hereto to retain any Material
Gaming License. A "Material Gaming License" is a license or similar
authorization under any Gaming Law without which Parent or the Company, as the
case may be, would be prohibited from operating any of its gaming properties in
the state in which such property is located. True, accurate and complete copies
of the Company's Articles of Incorporation and bylaws, in each case as in effect
on the date hereof, including all amendments thereto, have heretofore been
delivered to Parent.
Section 4.02. Capitalization. (a) The authorized capital stock of the
--------------
Company consists of (1) 40,000,000 shares of Company Common Stock and (2)
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.001 per share ("Company
Preferred Stock"). As of March 31, 2001, (i) 4,126,757 shares of Company Common
Stock were issued and outstanding, all of which shares of Company Common Stock
were validly issued and are fully paid, nonassessable and free of preemptive
rights, and no shares of Company Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding,
(ii) no shares of Company Common Stock and no shares of Company Preferred Stock
were held in the treasury of the Company, (iii) 543,750 shares of Company Common
Stock were reserved for issuance upon exercise of Options issued and
outstanding. Assuming the exercise of all outstanding options, as of March 31,
2001, there would be 4,670,507 shares of Company Common Stock issued and
outstanding. Since March 31, 2001, except as permitted by this Agreement or as
set forth in the Company Disclosure Schedule, (i) no shares of capital stock of
the Company have been issued except in connection with the exercise of the
instruments referred to in the second sentence of this Section 4.02(a) and (ii)
no options, warrants, securities convertible into, or commitments with respect
to the issuance of, shares of capital stock of the Company have been issued,
granted or made.
(b) Except as set forth in Section 4.02(a), as of the date hereof, there
are no outstanding subscriptions, options, calls, contracts, commitments,
understandings, restrictions, arrangements, rights or warrants, including any
right of conversion or exchange under any outstanding security, instrument or
other agreement and including any rights plan or other anti-takeover agreement,
obligating the Company or any subsidiary of the Company to issue, deliver or
sell, or cause to be issued, delivered or sold, additional shares of the capital
stock of the Company or obligating the Company or any subsidiary of the Company
to grant, extend or enter into any such agreement or commitment. There are no
outstanding stock appreciation rights or similar derivative securities or rights
of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. Except as disclosed in the Company
SEC Reports or as otherwise contemplated by this Agreement, there are no voting
trusts, irrevocable proxies or other agreements or understandings to which the
Company or any subsidiary of the Company is a party or is bound with respect to
the voting of any shares of capital stock of the Company.
Section 4.03. Subsidiaries. Each direct and indirect subsidiary of the
------------
Company is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws
of its jurisdiction of incorporation or organization and has the requisite power
and authority to own, lease and operate its assets and properties and to carry
on its business as it is now being conducted and each subsidiary of the Company
is qualified to transact business, and is in good standing, in each jurisdiction
in which the properties owned, leased or operated by it or the nature of the
business conducted by it makes such qualification necessary; except, in all
cases, where the failure to be so organized, existing, qualified
-6-
and in good standing would not, singly or in the aggregate with all other such
failures, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. All
of the outstanding shares of capital stock of or other equity interests in each
subsidiary of the Company are validly issued, fully paid, nonassessable and free
of preemptive rights. There are no subscriptions, options, warrants, rights,
calls, contracts or other commitments, understandings, restrictions or
arrangements relating to the issuance or sale with respect to any shares of
capital stock of or other equity interests in any subsidiary of the Company,
including any right of conversion or exchange under any outstanding security,
instrument or agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "subsidiary"
means, with respect to any specified person (the "Owner") any other person of
which more than 50% of the total voting power of shares of capital stock or
other equity interests entitled (without regard to the occurrence of any
contingency) to vote in the election of directors, managers, trustees or other
governing body thereof is at the time owned or controlled, directly or
indirectly, by such Owner or one or more of the other subsidiaries of such
Owner.
Section 4.04. Authority; Non-Contravention; Approvals. (a) The Company has
----------------------------------------
the requisite corporate power and authority to enter into this Agreement and,
subject to the Company Stockholders' Approval (as defined in Section 6.01(a))
with respect solely to the Merger, to consummate the transactions contemplated
hereby. This Agreement and the Merger have been approved and adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Company, and no other corporate proceedings on the
part of the Company are necessary to authorize the execution and delivery of
this Agreement or, except for the Company Stockholders' Approval with respect
solely to the Merger, the consummation by the Company of the transactions
contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the
Company, and, assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery hereof by
Parent and Merger Subsidiary, constitutes a valid and legally binding agreement
of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms,
except that such enforcement may be subject to (i) bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws affecting or relating to
enforcement of creditors' rights generally and (ii) general equitable
principles.
(b) The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by the
Company and the consummation of the Merger and the transactions contemplated
hereby do not and will not violate, conflict with or result in a breach of any
provision of, or constitute a default (or an event which, with notice or lapse
of time or both, would constitute a default) under, or result in the termination
of, or accelerate the performance required by, or result in a right of
termination or acceleration under, contractually require any offer to purchase
or any prepayment of any debt, or result in the creation of any lien, security
interest or encumbrance upon any of the properties or assets of the Company or
any of its subsidiaries under any of the terms, conditions or provisions of (i)
the respective articles or certificates of incorporation or bylaws or other
governing instruments of the Company or any of its Material Subsidiaries, (ii)
any statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, judgment, decree, order,
injunction, writ, permit or license of any court or governmental authority
applicable to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or any of their respective
properties or assets, subject, in the case of consummation, to obtaining (prior
to the Effective Time) the Company Required Statutory Approvals (as defined in
Section 4.04(c)) and the Company Stockholders' Approval, or (iii) any Contract
to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is now a party or by which the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or any of their respective properties or
assets may be bound or affected, subject, in the case of consummation, to
obtaining (prior to the Effective Time) consents required from commercial
lenders, lessors or other third parties as specified in Section 4.04(b) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, except, with respect to any item referred to in
clause (ii) or (iii), for any such violation, conflict, breach, default,
termination, acceleration or creation of liens, security interests or
encumbrances that would not reasonably be expected, individually or in the
aggregate, to have a Company Material Adverse Effect and would not materially
delay the consummation of the Merger.
(c) Except for (i) the filings by the Company required by the HSR Act,
(ii) the filing of the Proxy Statement and the Transaction Statement with the
SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act, (iii) the filing of Articles of Merger with
the Secretary of State of the State of Colorado in connection with the Merger,
(iv) any filings with or approvals from authorities required solely by virtue of
the jurisdictions in which Parent or its subsidiaries conduct any business or
own any assets, and (v) filings with and approvals in respect of Gaming Laws
(the filings and approvals referred to in clauses (i) through (v) and those
disclosed in Section 4.04(c) of the Company Disclosure Schedule being
collectively referred to as the "Company Required Statutory Approvals"), no
declaration, filing or registration with, or notice to, or authorization,
consent or approval of, any governmental or regulatory body or authority is
necessary for the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company or the
consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated hereby, other than
such declarations, filings, registrations, notices, authorizations, consents or
approvals which, if not made or obtained, as the case may be, would not
reasonably be expected, individually or in
-7-
the aggregate, to have a Company Material Adverse Effect and would not
materially delay the consummation of the Merger.
Section 4.05. Reports and Financial Statements. Since January 1, 1998,
--------------------------------
the Company has filed with the SEC all forms, statements, reports and documents
(including all exhibits, post-effective amendments and supplements thereto) (the
"Company SEC Reports") required to be filed by it under each of the Securities
Act, the Exchange Act and the respective rules and regulations thereunder, all
of which, as amended if applicable, complied when filed in all material respects
with all applicable requirements of the applicable act and the rules and
regulations thereunder. As of their respective dates, the Company SEC Reports
did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements
therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading. The audited consolidated financial statements of the Company
included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000
(the "Company Financial Statements") have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis (except
as may be indicated therein or in the notes thereto) and present fairly in all
material respects the financial position of the Company and its subsidiaries as
of the dates thereof and the results of their operations and changes in
financial position for the periods then ended.
Section 4.06. Absence of Undisclosed Liabilities. Except as disclosed in
----------------------------------
the Company SEC Reports or the Company Disclosure Schedule, neither the Company
nor any of its subsidiaries had at December 31, 2000, or has incurred since that
date and as of the date hereof, any liabilities or obligations (whether
absolute, accrued, contingent or otherwise) of any nature, except (a)
liabilities, obligations or contingencies (i) which are accrued or reserved
against in the Company Financial Statements or reflected in the notes thereto or
(ii) which were incurred after December 31, 2000 in the ordinary course of
business and consistent with past practice, (b) liabilities, obligations or
contingencies which (i) would not reasonably be expected, individually or in the
aggregate, to have a Company Material Adverse Effect, or (ii) have been
discharged or paid in full prior to the date hereof in the ordinary course of
business, and (c) liabilities, obligations and contingencies which are of a
nature not required to be reflected in the consolidated financial statements of
the Company and its subsidiaries prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles consistently applied.
Section 4.07. Absence of Certain Changes or Events. Since the date of the
------------------------------------
most recent Company SEC Report filed prior to the date of this Agreement that
contains consolidated financial statements of the Company, there has not been
any Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.08. Litigation. Except as referred to in the Company SEC
----------
Reports, there are no claims, suits, actions or proceedings pending or, to the
knowledge of the Company, threatened against, relating to or affecting the
Company or any of its subsidiaries, before any court, governmental department,
commission, agency, instrumentality or authority, or any arbitrator that would
reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect. Except as referred to in the Company SEC Reports,
neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is subject to any judgment,
decree, injunction, rule or order of any court, governmental department,
commission, agency, instrumentality or authority, or any arbitrator which
prohibits the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby or would
reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.09. Proxy Statement and Other SEC Filings. None of the
--------------------------------------
information supplied by the Company or any of its subsidiaries for inclusion in
(i) the Proxy Statement, at the time of the mailing of the Proxy Statement and
any amendments or supplements thereto, or at the time of the meeting of
stockholders of the Company to be held in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, or (ii) the Transaction Statement at the time of
the filing thereof with the SEC or at any time the Transaction Statement is
amended or supplemented, will contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under
which they are made, not misleading. The Proxy Statement and the Transaction
Statement will comply as to form in all material respects with all applicable
laws, including the provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder, except that no representation is made by the Company
with respect to information supplied by Parent, Merger Subsidiary or any
stockholder of Parent for inclusion therein.
-8-
Section 4.10. No Violation of Law. Except as disclosed in the Company SEC
-------------------
Reports filed prior to the date of this Agreement, neither the Company nor any
of its subsidiaries is in violation of or has been given written (or, to the
knowledge of the Company's executive officers, oral) notice of any violation of,
any law, statute, order, rule, regulation, ordinance or judgment (including,
without limitation, any applicable environmental law, ordinance or regulation)
of any governmental or regulatory body or authority, except for violations which
would not reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a
Company Material Adverse Effect. Except as disclosed in the Company SEC Reports
filed prior to the date of this Agreement, to the knowledge of the Company, no
investigation or review by any governmental or regulatory body or authority is
pending or threatened, nor has any governmental or regulatory body or authority
indicated an intention to conduct the same, other than, in each case, those the
outcome of which would not reasonably be expected, individually or in the
aggregate, to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. The Company and its
subsidiaries are not in violation of the terms of any permit, license,
franchise, variance, exemption, order or other governmental authorization,
consent or approval necessary to conduct their businesses as presently conducted
(collectively, the "Company Permits"), except for delays in filing reports or
violations which would not reasonably be expected, individually or in the
aggregate, to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.11. Compliance with Agreements. Except as disclosed in the
--------------------------
Company SEC Reports, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is in
breach or violation of or in default in the performance or observance of any
term or provision of, and no event has occurred which, with lapse of time or
action by a third party, would result in a default under, any Contract to which
the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party or by which any of them is
bound or to which any of their property is subject, other than breaches,
violations and defaults which would not reasonably be expected, individually or
in the aggregate, to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. To the knowledge of
the Company's executive officers, the Company's insurance policies relating to
directors' and officers' liability are in full force and effect.
Section 4.12. Taxes. (a) The Company and its subsidiaries have (i) duly
-----
filed with the appropriate governmental authorities all Tax Returns required to
be filed by them, and such Tax Returns are true, correct and complete, and (ii)
duly paid in full or reserved in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles on the Company Financial Statements all Taxes required to be paid,
except in each such case as would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a
Company Material Adverse Effect. Except as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Company Material Adverse Effect, there are no liens for Taxes
upon any property or asset of the Company or any subsidiary thereof, other than
liens for Taxes not yet due or Taxes contested in good faith and reserved
against in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. There are
no unresolved issues of law or fact arising out of a notice of deficiency,
proposed deficiency or assessment from the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS")
or any other governmental taxing authority with respect to Taxes of the Company
or any of its subsidiaries which would individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. Except as
would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Company Material Adverse
Effect, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has agreed to an
extension of time with respect to a Tax deficiency, other than extensions which
are no longer in effect. Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate,
have a Company Material Adverse Effect, neither the Company nor any of its
subsidiaries is a party to any agreement providing for the allocation or sharing
of Taxes with any entity that is not, directly or indirectly, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, other than agreements the consequences of which are
fully and adequately reserved for in the Company Financial Statements.
(b) Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Company
Material Adverse Effect, the Company and each of its subsidiaries has withheld
or collected and has paid over to the appropriate governmental entities (or is
properly holding for such payment) all material Taxes required to be collected
or withheld.
(c) For purposes of this Agreement, "Tax" (including, with correlative
meaning, the term "Taxes") means all federal, state, local and foreign income,
profits, franchise, gross receipts, environmental, customs duty, capital stock,
communications services, severance, stamp, payroll, sales, employment,
unemployment, disability, use, property, withholding, excise, production, value
added, occupancy and other taxes, duties or assessments of any nature
whatsoever, together with all interest, penalties and additions imposed with
respect to such amounts and any interest in respect of such penalties and
additions, and includes any liability for Taxes of another person by contract,
as a transferee or successor, under Treas. Reg. 1.1502-6 or analogous state,
local or foreign law provision or
-9-
otherwise, and "Tax Return" means any return, report or similar statement
(including attached schedules) required to be filed with respect to any Tax,
including without limitation, any information return, claim for refund, amended
return or declaration of estimated Tax.
Section 4.13. Employee Benefit Plans; ERISA (a) The Company SEC
-----------------------------
Reports_or the Company Disclosure Letter set forth each employee or director
benefit plan, arrangement or agreement, including without limitation any
employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of Section 3(1) of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), any employee
pension benefit plan within the meaning of Section 3(2) of ERISA (whether or not
such plan is subject to ERISA) and any bonus, incentive, deferred compensation,
vacation, stock purchase, stock option, severance, employment, change of control
or fringe benefit plan, program or agreement (excluding any multi-employer plan
as defined in Section 3(37) of ERISA (a "Multi-employer Plan") and any multiple
employer plan within the meaning of Section 413(c) of the Code) that is
sponsored, maintained or contributed to by the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or by any trade or business, whether or not incorporated, all of
which together with the Company would be deemed a "single employer" within the
meaning of Section 4001 of ERISA (the "Company Plans").
(b) Except as disclosed in the Company SEC Reports or in the Company
Disclosure Schedule, (i) there have been no prohibited transactions within the
meaning of Section 406 or 407 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code with respect
to any of the Company Plans that could result in penalties, taxes or liabilities
which would, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a
Company Material Adverse Effect, (ii) no Company Plan is subject to Title IV of
ERISA, (iii) each of the Company Plans has been operated and administered in
accordance with all applicable laws during the period of time covered by the
applicable statute of limitations, except for failures to comply which would not
reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect, (iv) each of the Company Plans which is intended to be
"qualified" within the meaning of Section 401(a) of the Code has been determined
by the IRS to be so qualified and such determination has not been revoked by
failure to satisfy any condition thereof or by a subsequent amendment thereto or
a failure to amend, except that it may be necessary to make additional
amendments retroactively to maintain the "qualified" status of such Company
Plans, and the period for making any such necessary retroactive amendments has
not expired, (v) to the knowledge of the Company and its subsidiaries, there are
no pending, threatened or anticipated claims involving any of the Company Plans
other than claims for benefits in the ordinary course or claims which would not
reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect, (vi) no Company Plan provides post-retirement medical
benefits to employees or directors of the Company or any of its subsidiaries
beyond their retirement or other termination of service, other than coverage
mandated by applicable law, (vii) all material contributions or other amounts
payable by the Company or its subsidiaries as of the date hereof with respect to
each Company Plan in respect of current or prior plan years have been paid or
accrued in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, (viii) with
respect to each Multi-employer Plan contributed to by the Company, to the
knowledge of the Company and its subsidiaries, as of the date hereof, none of
the Company or any of its subsidiaries has received any notification that any
such Multi-employer Plan is in reorganization, has been terminated or is
insolvent, (ix) the Company and each of its subsidiaries has complied in all
respects with the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, except for
failures which would not reasonably be expected, individually or in the
aggregate, to have a Company Material Adverse Effect, and (x) no act, omission
or transaction has occurred with respect to any Company Plan that has resulted
or could result in any liability of the Company or any subsidiary under Section
409 or 502(c)(1) or (l) of ERISA or Chapter 43 of Subtitle (A) of the Code,
except for liabilities which would not reasonably be expected, individually or
in the aggregate, to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(c) Except as set forth in the Company Disclosure Schedule, and excluding
payments in respect of outstanding Options, neither the execution and delivery
of this Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby
will (i) result in any payment (including, without limitation, any severance or
"excess parachute payment" (within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code))
becoming due to any director or employee of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries under any Company Plan, (ii) increase any benefits otherwise
payable under any Company Plan, or (iii) result in any acceleration of the time
of payment or vesting of any such benefits.
Section 4.14. Labor Controversies. Except as disclosed in the Company SEC
-------------------
Reports, (a) there are no significant controversies pending or, to the knowledge
of the Company, threatened between the Company or any of its subsidiaries and
any representatives (including unions) of any of their employees, and (b) to the
knowledge of
-10-
the Company, there are no organizational efforts presently being made involving
any of the presently unorganized employees of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries.
Section 4.15. Environmental Matters. (a) Except as disclosed in the
Company SEC Reports or the Company Disclosure Schedule and for other matters
that would not, singly or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a
Company Material Adverse Effect, (i) the Company and its subsidiaries have
conducted their respective businesses in compliance with all applicable
Environmental Laws, including, without limitation, having all permits, licenses
and other approvals and authorizations necessary for the operation of their
respective businesses as presently conducted, (ii) none of the properties owned
by the Company or any of its subsidiaries contain any Hazardous Substance in
amounts exceeding the levels permitted by applicable Environmental Laws, (iii)
since January 1, 1998, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has
received any notices, demand letters or requests for information from any
Federal, state, local or foreign governmental entity indicating that the Company
or any of its subsidiaries may be in violation of, or liable under, any
Environmental Law in connection with the ownership or operation of their
businesses, (iv) there are no civil, criminal or administrative actions, suits,
demands, claims, hearings, investigations or proceedings pending or threatened,
against the Company or any of its subsidiaries relating to any violation, or
alleged violation, of any Environmental Law, (v) no Hazardous Substance has been
disposed of, released or transported in violation of any applicable
Environmental Law from any properties owned by the Company or any of its
subsidiaries as a result of any activity of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries during the time such properties were owned, leased or operated by
the Company or any of its subsidiaries, and (vi) neither the Company, its
subsidiaries nor any of their respective properties are subject to any
liabilities or expenditures (fixed or contingent) relating to any suit,
settlement, court order, administrative order, regulatory requirement, judgment
or claim asserted or arising under any Environmental Law.
(b) As used herein, "Environmental Law" means any federal, state, local or
foreign law, statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, code, license, permit,
authorization, approval, consent, legal doctrine, order, judgment, decree,
injunction, requirement or agreement with any governmental entity relating to
(x) the protection, preservation or restoration of the environment (including,
without limitation, air, water vapor, surface water, groundwater, drinking water
supply, surface land, subsurface land, plant and animal life or any other
natural resource) or to human health or safety, or (y) the exposure to, or the
use, storage, recycling, treatment, generation, transportation, processing,
handling, labeling, production, release or disposal of Hazardous Substances, in
each case as amended and as in effect at the Effective Time. The term
"Environmental Law" includes, without limitation, (i) the Federal Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of
1972, the Federal Clean Air Act, the Federal Clean Water Act, the Federal
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (including the Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendments thereto), the Federal Solid Waste Disposal Act and the
Federal Toxic Substances Control Act, the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and
Rodenticide Act, and the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,
each as amended and as in effect at the Effective Time, and (ii) any common law
or equitable doctrine (including, without limitation, injunctive relief and tort
doctrines such as negligence, nuisance, trespass and strict liability) that may
impose liability or obligations for injuries or damages arising from or
threatened as a result of, the presence of, effects of or exposure to any
Hazardous Substance.
(c) As used herein, "Hazardous Substance" means any substance presently or
hereafter listed, defined, designated or classified as hazardous, toxic,
radioactive, or dangerous, or otherwise regulated, under any Environmental Law.
Hazardous Substance includes any substance to which exposure is regulated by any
government authority or any Environmental Law including, without limitation, any
toxic waste, pollutant, contaminant, hazardous substance, toxic substance,
hazardous waste, special waste, industrial substance or petroleum or any
derivative or by-product thereof, radon, radioactive material, asbestos, or
asbestos-containing material, urea formaldehyde foam insulation, lead or
polychlorinated biphenyls.
Section 4.16. Title to Assets. The Company and each of its subsidiaries
---------------
has good and valid title in fee simple to all its real property and good title
to all its leasehold interests and other properties, as reflected in the most
recent balance sheet included in the Company Financial Statements, except for
properties and assets that have been disposed of in the ordinary course of
business since the date of such balance sheet, free and clear of all mortgages,
liens, pledges, charges or encumbrances of any nature whatsoever, except (i) the
lien for current taxes, payments of which are not yet delinquent, (ii) such
imperfections in title and easements and encumbrances, if any, as are not
substantial in character, amount or extent and do not materially detract from
the value, or interfere with the present
-11-
use of the property subject thereto or affected thereby, or otherwise materially
impair the Company's business operations (in the manner presently carried on by
the Company), or (iii) as disclosed in the Company SEC Reports, and except for
such matters which would not reasonably be expected, individually or in the
aggregate, to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. All leases under which the
Company or any of its subsidiaries leases any real or personal property are in
good standing, valid and effective in accordance with their respective terms,
and there is not, under any of such leases, any existing default or event which
with notice or lapse of time or both would become a default other than failures
to be in good standing, valid and effective and defaults under such leases which
would not reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a
Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.17. Company Stockholders' Approval. The affirmative vote of
------------------------------
stockholders of the Company required for approval and adoption of this Agreement
and the Merger is a majority of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock
entitled to vote thereon.
Section 4.18. Brokers and Finders. The Company has not entered into any
--------------------
contract, arrangement or understanding with any person or firm which may result
in the obligation of the Company to pay any investment banking fees, finder's
fees or brokerage fees in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby,
other than fees payable to Robertson Stephens, Inc. (the "Special Committee
Financial Advisor"), or as disclosed in Section 4.18 of the Company Disclosure
Schedule. An accurate copy of any fee agreement with the Company Financial
Advisor has been made available to Parent.
ARTICLE V
COVENANTS
Section 5.01. Conduct of Business by the Company Pending the Merger.
------------------------------------------------------
Except as otherwise contemplated by this Agreement or disclosed in Section 5.01
of the Company Disclosure Schedule, after the date hereof and prior to the
Effective Time or earlier termination of this Agreement, unless Parent shall
otherwise agree in writing, the Company shall, and shall cause its subsidiaries
to:
(a) conduct their respective businesses in the ordinary and usual course of
business and consistent with past practice, including with respect to casino
credit policies;
(b) not (i) amend or propose to amend their respective articles of
incorporation or bylaws or equivalent constitutional documents, (ii) split,
combine or reclassify their outstanding capital stock or (iii) declare, set
aside or pay any dividend or distribution payable in cash, stock, property or
otherwise, except for the payment of dividends or distributions to the Company
or a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company by a direct or indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company;
(c) not issue, sell, pledge or dispose of, or agree to issue, sell, pledge
or dispose of, any additional shares of, or any options, warrants or rights of
any kind to acquire any shares of, their capital stock of any class or any debt
or equity securities convertible into or exchangeable for any such capital
stock, except that the Company may issue shares upon the exercise of Options
outstanding on the date hereof;
(d) not (i) incur or become contingently liable with respect to any
indebtedness for borrowed money other than (A) borrowings in the ordinary course
of business or borrowings under the existing credit facilities of the Company or
of any of its subsidiaries up to the existing borrowing limit on the date
hereof, and (B) borrowings to refinance existing indebtedness on terms which are
reasonably acceptable to Parent; provided that in no event shall aggregate
indebtedness of the Company and its subsidiaries, net of all cash and cash
equivalents, exceed $75,000,000, (ii) redeem, purchase, acquire or offer to
purchase or acquire any shares of its capital stock or any options, warrants or
rights to acquire any of its capital stock or any security convertible into or
exchangeable for its capital stock other than in connection with the exercise of
outstanding Options pursuant to the terms of the Company Option Plans, (iii)
except as disclosed in Section 5.01(d)(i) of the Company Disclosure Schedule,
make any acquisition of any assets or businesses other than expenditures for
current assets in the ordinary course of business and expenditures for fixed or
capital assets in the ordinary course of business, (iv) without Parent's
consent, acquire any gaming property in the State of Colorado, (v) sell, pledge,
dispose of or encumber any assets or businesses other than (A) sales of
businesses or assets disclosed in Section 5.01 of the Company Disclosure
Schedule, (B) pledges or encumbrances pursuant to Existing Credit Facilities or
other permitted borrowings, (C) sales of real estate, assets or
-12-
facilities for cash consideration (including any debt assumed by the buyer of
such real estate, assets or facilities) to non-affiliates of the Company of less
than $100,000 in each such case and $500,000 in the aggregate, (D) sales or
dispositions of businesses or assets as may be required by applicable law, and
(E) sales or dispositions of assets in the ordinary course or (vi) enter into
any binding contract, agreement, commitment or arrangement with respect to any
of the foregoing;
(e) use all reasonable efforts to preserve intact their respective business
organizations and goodwill, keep available the services of their respective
present officers and key employees, and preserve the goodwill and business
relationships with customers and others having business relationships with them
other than as expressly permitted by the terms of this Agreement;
(f) not enter into, amend, modify or renew any employment, consulting,
severance or similar agreement with, or grant any salary, wage or other increase
in compensation or increase in any employee benefit to, any director or officer
of the Company or of any of its subsidiaries, except (i) for changes that are
required by applicable law, (ii) to satisfy obligations existing as of the date
hereof, or (iii) in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice;
(g) not enter into, establish, adopt, amend or modify any pension,
retirement, stock purchase, savings, profit sharing, deferred compensation,
consulting, bonus, group insurance or other employee benefit, incentive or
welfare plan, agreement, program or arrangement, in respect of any director,
officer or employee of the Company or of any of its subsidiaries, except, in
each such case, as may be required by applicable law or by the terms of
contractual obligations existing as of the date hereof, including any collective
bargaining agreement;
(h) not make expenditures, including, but not limited to, capital
expenditures, or enter into any binding commitment or contract to make
expenditures, except (i) expenditures which the Company or its subsidiaries are
currently contractually committed to make, (ii) other expenditures not exceeding
$250,000 individually or $500,000 in the aggregate, (iii) for emergency repairs
and other expenditures necessary in light of circumstances not anticipated as of
the date of this Agreement which are necessary to avoid significant disruption
to the Company's business or operations consistent with past practice (and, if
reasonably practicable, after consultation with Parent), or (iv) for repairs and
maintenance in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice.
With respect to the subject matter of this paragraph (h), if the Company
requests approval of Parent to exceed the limits set forth herein, Parent shall
respond to such request and grant or withhold approval promptly following
receipt of such request;
(i) not make, change or revoke any material Tax election unless required by
law or make any agreement or settlement with any taxing authority regarding any
material amount of Taxes or which would reasonably be expected to materially
increase the obligations of the Company or the Surviving Corporation to pay
Taxes in the future; and
(j) not settle or compromise any litigation to which the Company or any
Company subsidiary is a party or with respect to which the Company or any
Company subsidiary may have or incur liability, at an aggregate cost to the
Company in excess of $250,000 with respect to any action or claim or in excess
of $500,000 with respect to all applicable actions and claims in the aggregate.
Section 5.02. Control of the Company's Operations. Nothing contained in
-----------------------------------
this Agreement shall give to Parent, directly or indirectly, rights to control
or direct the Company's operations prior to the Effective Time. Prior to the
Effective Time, the Company shall exercise, consistent with the terms and
conditions of this Agreement, complete control and supervision of its
operations.
Section 5.03. Acquisition Transactions. (a) After the date hereof and
------------------------
prior to the Effective Time or earlier termination of this Agreement, except in
accordance with Section 5.03(b), the Company shall not, and shall not permit any
of its subsidiaries to, initiate, solicit, negotiate, encourage or provide
confidential information to facilitate, and the Company shall use all reasonable
efforts to cause any officer, director or employee of the Company, or any
attorney, accountant, investment banker, financial advisor or other agent
retained by it or any of its subsidiaries, not to initiate, solicit, negotiate,
encourage or provide non-public or confidential information to facilitate, any
proposal or offer to acquire all or any substantial part of the business,
properties or capital stock of the
-13-
Company, whether by merger, purchase of assets, tender offer or otherwise,
whether for cash, securities or any other consideration or combination thereof
(any such transactions being referred to herein as an "Acquisition
Transaction").
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) above, (i) the Company
may, prior to receipt of the Company Stockholders' Approval, in response to an
unsolicited bona fide written offer or proposal with respect to a potential or
proposed Acquisition Transaction ("Acquisition Proposal") from a corporation,
partnership, person or other entity or group (a "Potential Acquirer") which the
Company's Board of Directors determines, in good faith and after consultation
with its independent financial advisor, would reasonably be expected to result
(if consummated pursuant to its terms) in an Acquisition Transaction more
favorable to the Company's stockholders than the Merger (a "Qualifying
Proposal"), furnish (subject to the execution of a confidentiality agreement
substantially similar to the confidentiality provisions of the Confidentiality
Agreement (as defined in Section 5.04)) confidential or non-public information
to, and negotiate with, such Potential Acquirer, may resolve to accept, or
recommend, and, upon termination of this Agreement in accordance with Section
7.01(v) and after payment to Parent of the fee pursuant to Section 5.09(b),
enter into agreements relating to, a Qualifying Proposal which the Company's
Board of Directors, in good faith, has determined is reasonably likely to be
consummated (such Qualifying Proposal being a "Superior Proposal") and (ii) the
Company's Board of Directors may take and disclose to the Company's stockholders
a position contemplated by Rule 14e-2 under the Exchange Act or otherwise make
disclosure required by the federal securities laws. It is understood and agreed
that negotiations and other activities conducted in accordance with this
paragraph (b) shall not constitute a violation of paragraph (a) of this Section
5.03.
(c) The Company shall promptly notify Parent after receipt of any
Acquisition Proposal, indication of interest or request for non-public
information relating to the Company or its subsidiaries in connection with an
Acquisition Proposal or for access to the properties, books or records of the
Company or any subsidiary by any person or entity that informs the Board of
Directors of the Company or such subsidiary that it is considering making, or
has made, an Acquisition Proposal. Such notice to Parent shall be given orally
and in writing and shall indicate in reasonable detail the identity of the
offeror and the material terms and conditions of such proposal, inquiry or
contact.
Section 5.04. Access to Information. The Company and its subsidiaries
---------------------
shall afford to Parent and Merger Subsidiary and their respective accountants,
counsel, financial advisors, sources of financing and other representatives (the
"Parent Representatives") reasonable access during normal business hours with
reasonable notice throughout the period prior to the Effective Time to all of
their respective properties, books, contracts, commitments and records
(including, but not limited to, Tax Returns) and, during such period, shall
furnish promptly (i) a copy of each report, schedule and other document filed or
received by any of them pursuant to the requirements of federal or state
securities laws or filed by any of them with the SEC in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and (ii) such other information
concerning its businesses, properties and personnel as Parent or Merger
Subsidiary shall reasonably request and will obtain the reasonable cooperation
of the Company's officers, employees, counsel, accountants, consultants and
financial advisors in connection with the investigation of the Company by Parent
and the Parent Representatives. All nonpublic information provided to, or
obtained by, Parent or any Parent Representative in connection with the
transactions contemplated hereby shall be "Information" for purposes of the
Confidentiality Agreement dated April 23, 2001 between Parent and the Company
(the "Confidentiality Agreement"), provided that Parent, Merger Subsidiary and
the Company may disclose such information as may be necessary in connection with
seeking the Parent Required Statutory Approvals, the Company Required Statutory
Approvals and the Company Stockholders' Approval. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
the Company shall not be required to provide any information which it reasonably
believes it may not provide to Parent by reason of applicable law, rules or
regulations, which constitutes information protected by attorney/client
privilege, or which the Company or any subsidiary is required to keep
confidential by reason of contract, agreement or understanding with third
parties entered into prior to the date hereof.
Section 5.05. Notices of Certain Events. (a) The Company shall as
-------------------------
promptly as reasonably practicable after executive officers of the Company
acquire knowledge thereof, notify Parent of: (i) any notice or other
communication from any person alleging that the consent of such person (or
another person) is or may be required in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement which consent relates to a material Contract to
which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party or which if not obtained
would materially delay consummation of the Merger; (ii) any notice or other
communication from any governmental or regulatory agency
-14-
or authority in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
and (iii) any actions, suits, claims, investigations or proceedings commenced
or, to the best of its knowledge threatened against, relating to or involving or
otherwise affecting the Company or any of its subsidiaries that, if pending on
the date of this Agreement, would have been required to have been disclosed
pursuant to Section 4.08 or 4.10 or which relate to the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(b) Each of Parent and Merger Subsidiary shall as promptly as reasonably
practicable after executive officers of the Parent acquire knowledge thereof,
notify the Company of: (i) any notice or other communication from any person
alleging that the consent of such person (or other person) is or may be required
in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement which consent
relates to a material Contract to which Parent or any of its subsidiaries is a
party or which if not obtained would materially delay the Merger, (ii) any
notice or other communication from any governmental or regulatory agency or
authority in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
and (iii) any actions, suits, claims, investigations or proceedings commenced
or, to the best of its knowledge threatened, against Parent or Merger
Subsidiary, which relate to consummation of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement.
(c) Each of the Company, Parent and Merger Subsidiary agrees to give prompt
notice to each other of, and to use commercially reasonable efforts to remedy,
(i) the occurrence or failure to occur of any event which occurrence or failure
would be likely to cause any of its representations or warranties in this
Agreement to be untrue or inaccurate at the Effective Time unless such failure
or occurrence would not have a Company Material Adverse Effect or a Parent
Material Adverse Effect, as the case may be, and (ii) any failure on its part to
comply with or satisfy any covenant, condition or agreement to be complied with
or satisfied by it hereunder unless such failure or occurrence would not have a
Company Material Adverse Effect or a Parent Material Adverse Effect, as the case
may be. The delivery of any notice pursuant to this Section 5.05(c) shall not
limit or otherwise affect the remedies available hereunder to the party
receiving such notice.
(12) Section 5.06. Meeting of the Company's Stockholders. The Company
-------------------------------------
shall as promptly as practicable after the date of this Agreement take all
action necessary in accordance with the CBCA and its Articles of Incorporation
and bylaws to convene a meeting of the Company's stockholders (the "Company
Stockholders' Meeting") to act on this Agreement. The Board of Directors of the
Company shall recommend that the Company's stockholders vote to approve the
Merger and adopt this Agreement; provided, however, that the Company may change
its recommendation in any manner if its recommendation of the Merger would be
inconsistent with the board of directors' fiduciary duties under applicable law,
as determined by the board of directors in good faith after consultation with
its financial and legal advisors.
Section 5.07. Proxy Statement and Other SEC Filings. As promptly
-------------------------------------
as practicable after execution of this Agreement, the parties shall cooperate
and promptly prepare and the Company shall file the Proxy Statement and the
Transaction Statement with the SEC under the Exchange Act, and the parties shall
use all reasonable efforts to have the Proxy Statement and the Transaction
Statement cleared by the SEC. The Company shall notify Parent of the receipt of
any comments of the SEC with respect to the Proxy Statement or Transaction
Statement and of any requests by the SEC for any amendment or supplement thereto
or for additional information, and shall provide to Parent promptly copies of
all correspondence between the Company or any representative of the Company and
the SEC. The Company shall give Parent and its counsel the opportunity to review
the Proxy Statement and Transaction Statement prior to their being filed with
the SEC and shall give Parent and its counsel the opportunity to review all
amendments and supplements to the Proxy Statement and Transaction Statement and
all responses to requests for additional information and replies to comments
prior to their being filed with, or sent to, the SEC. Each of the Company,
Parent and Merger Subsidiary agrees to use its reasonable best efforts, after
consultation with the other parties hereto, to respond promptly to all such
comments of and requests by the SEC. As promptly as practicable after the Proxy
Statement and Transaction Statement have been cleared by the SEC, the Company
shall mail the Proxy Statement to the stockholders of the Company. Prior to the
date of approval of the Merger by the Company's stockholders, each of the
Company, Parent and Merger Subsidiary shall correct promptly any information
provided by it to be used specifically in the Proxy Statement or the Transaction
Statement that shall have become false or misleading in any material respect and
the Company shall take all steps necessary to file with the SEC and cleared by
the SEC any amendment or supplement to the Proxy Statement or the Transaction
Statement so as to correct the same and to cause the Proxy Statement as so
corrected to be disseminated to the stockholders of the Company, in each case to
the extent required by applicable law.
-15-
Section 5.08. Public Announcements. Parent and the Company will consult
--------------------
with each other before issuing any press release or making any public statement
with respect to this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby and,
except as may be required by applicable law or any listing agreement with the
NASDAQ -National Market System, will not issue any such press release or make
any such public statement prior to such consultation.
Section 5.09. Expenses and Fees. (a) All costs and expenses incurred
-----------------
in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby shall
be paid by the party incurring such expenses, except that those expenses
incurred in connection with printing and filing the Proxy Statement and the
Transaction Statement or with any filing under the HSR Act shall be shared
equally by Parent and the Company.
(b) The Company agrees to pay to Parent a fee equal to $1,000,000 if:
(i) the Company terminates this Agreement pursuant toclause (v)
of Section 7.01;
(ii) Parent terminates this Agreement pursuant to clause (vi) of
Section 7.01, which fee shall be payable within two business
days of such termination;
(iii) this Agreement is terminated for any reason at a time at which
Parent was not in material breach of its representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements contained in this
Agreement and was entitled to terminate this Agreement pursuant
to clause (vii) of Section 7.01, and (A) prior to the time of
the Company Stockholders' Meeting a proposal by a third party
relating to an Acquisition Transaction had been publicly
proposed or publicly announced, and (B) on or prior to the 12
month anniversary of the termination of this Agreement the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates enters into an
agreement or letter of intent (or resolves or announces an
intention to do) with respect to an Acquisition Transaction
involving a person, entity or group if such person, entity,
group (or any member of such group, or any affiliate of any of
the foregoing) made a proposal with respect to an Acquisition
Transaction on or after the date hereof and prior to the
Company Stockholders' Meeting and such Acquisition Transaction
is consummated.
(c) Parent agrees to pay the Company a fee equal to $2,000,000 if Parent
either (i) breaches its representation and covenant under Section 5.12 or (ii)
fails to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement on or before
12:00 noon, Mountain Time, on the Outside Date notwithstanding the satisfaction
of the conditions to Parent's obligation to consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement on or before the Outside Date (not including
conditions whose failure to be satisfied is the result of a breach of a
representation, warranty or covenant of Parent or Merger Subsidiary hereunder).
Section 5.10. Agreement to Cooperate. (a) Subject to the terms and
-----------------------
conditions of this Agreement, including Section 5.03, each of the parties hereto
shall use all reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all action
and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or advisable under
applicable laws and regulations (including the HSR Act and the Gaming Laws) to
consummate and make effective the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
including using its reasonable best efforts to obtain all necessary or
appropriate waivers, consents or approvals of third parties required in order to
preserve material contractual relationships of Parent and the Company and their
respective subsidiaries, all necessary or appropriate waivers, consents and
approvals to effect all necessary registrations, filings and submissions and to
lift any injunction or other legal bar to the Merger (and, in that case, to
proceed with the Merger as expeditiously as possible). In addition, subject to
the terms and conditions herein provided and subject to the fiduciary duties of
the respective boards of directors of the Company and Parent, none of the
parties hereto shall knowingly take or cause to be taken any action (including,
but not limited to, in the case of Parent, (x) the incurrence of material debt
financing, other than the financing in connection with the Merger and related
transactions and other than debt financing incurred in the ordinary course of
business, and (y) the acquisition of businesses or assets) which would
reasonably be expected to delay materially or prevent consummation of the
Merger.
-16-
(b) Without limitation of the foregoing, each of Parent and the Company
undertakes and agrees to file as soon as practicable, if required, a
Notification and Report Form under the HSR Act with the United States Federal
Trade Commission (the "FTC") and the Antitrust Division of the United States
Department of Justice (the "Antitrust Division"), and to make such filings and
apply for such approvals and consents as are required under the Gaming Laws.
Each of Parent and the Company shall (i) respond as promptly as practicable to
any inquiries received from the FTC or the Antitrust Division or any authority
enforcing applicable Gaming Laws for additional information or documentation and
to all inquiries and requests received from any State Attorney General or other
governmental authority in connection with antitrust matters or Gaming Laws, and
(ii) not extend any waiting period under the HSR Act or enter into any agreement
with the FTC or the Antitrust Division not to consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, except with the prior written consent of the
other parties hereto. Each party shall (i) promptly notify the other party of
any written communication to that party from the FTC, the Antitrust Division,
any State Attorney General or any other governmental entity and, subject to
applicable law, permit the other party to review in advance any proposed written
communication to any of the foregoing; (ii) not agree to participate in any
substantive meeting or discussion with any governmental authority in respect of
any filings, investigation or inquiry concerning this Agreement or the Merger
unless it consults with the other party in advance and, to the extent permitted
by such governmental authority, gives the other party the opportunity to attend
and participate thereat; and (iii) furnish the other party with copies of all
correspondence, filings, and communications (and memoranda setting forth the
substance thereof) between them and their affiliates and their respective
representatives on the one hand, and any government or regulatory authority or
members or their respective staffs on the other hand, with respect to this
Agreement and the Merger.
Section 5.11. Directors' and Officers' Indemnification. (a) The
----------------------------------------
indemnification provisions of the articles of incorporation and bylaws of the
Company as in effect at the Effective Time shall not be amended, repealed or
otherwise modified for a period of six years from the Effective Time in any
manner that would adversely affect the rights thereunder of individuals who at
the Effective Time were directors, officers, employees or agents of the Company.
(b) Without limiting Section 5.11(a), after the Effective Time, the
Surviving Corporation shall, and Parent shall cause the Surviving Corporation
to, to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law, indemnify and hold
harmless, each present and former director, officer, employee and agent of the
Company or any of its subsidiaries (each, together with such person's heirs,
executors or administrators, an "Indemnified Party" and collectively, the
"Indemnified Parties") against any costs or expenses (including attorneys'
fees), judgments, fines, losses, claims, damages, liabilities and amounts paid
in settlement in connection with any actual or threatened claim, action, suit,
proceeding or investigation, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative (collectively, "Costs and Expenses"), arising out of, relating to
or in connection with (i) any action or omission occurring or alleged to occur
prior to the Effective Time (including, without limitation, acts or omissions in
connection with such persons serving as an officer, director or other fiduciary
in any entity if such service was at the request or for the benefit of the
Company) or (ii) the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement or arising out of or pertaining to the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement or the events and developments between Parent and the Company
leading up to this Agreement. Any Indemnified Party hereunder will (1) give
prompt notice to the Surviving Corporation of any claim which arises from or
after the Effective Time with respect to which it seeks indemnification and (2)
permit the Surviving Corporation to assume the defense of such claim with
counsel reasonably satisfactory to a majority of the Indemnified Parties. In
connection with the selection of counsel to represent the Indemnified Parties in
connection with clause (2) above, the Surviving Corporation shall propose
counsel to represent the Indemnified Parties. The applicable Indemnified Parties
shall have the right to approve such counsel, but such approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld. If the proposed counsel is not approved, the Surviving
Corporation shall continue to propose counsel until counsel is approved by the
applicable Indemnified Parties. Any Indemnified Party shall have the right to
employ separate counsel and to participate in the defense of such claim, but the
fees and expenses of such counsel shall be at the expense of such person unless:
(x) the Surviving Corporation has agreed, in writing, to pay such fees or
expenses; (y) the Surviving Corporation shall have failed to assume the defense
of such claim after the receipt of notice from the Indemnified Party as required
above and failed to employ counsel reasonably satisfactory to a majority of the
Indemnified Parties or (z) based upon advice of counsel to such Indemnified
Party and concurrence therewith by counsel for the group of Indemnified Parties
in such matter, there shall be one or more defenses available to such
Indemnified Party that are not available to the Surviving Corporation or there
shall exist conflicts of interest between such Indemnified Party and the
Surviving Corporation or the other Indemnified Parties (in which case, if the
Indemnified Party notifies the
-17-
Surviving Corporation in writing that such Indemnified Party elects to employ
separate counsel at the expense of the Surviving Corporation, the Surviving
Corporation shall not have the right to assume the defense of such claim on
behalf of such Indemnified Party), in each of which events the reasonable fees
and expenses of such counsel (which counsel shall be reasonably acceptable to
the Surviving Corporation) shall be at the expense of the Surviving Corporation.
(c) If the Surviving Corporation or Parent or any of their successors or
assigns (i) consolidates with or merges into any other person and shall not be
the continuing or surviving corporation or entity of such consolidation or
merger, or (ii) transfers all or substantially all of its properties and assets
to any person, then and in each such case, proper provision shall be made so
that the successors and assigns of the Surviving Corporation or Parent shall
assume the obligations of the Surviving Corporation or the Parent, as the case
may be, set forth in this Section 5.11.
(d) For a period of six years after the Effective Time, Parent shall cause
to be maintained or shall cause the Surviving Corporation to maintain in effect
the current policies of directors' and officers' liability insurance maintained
by the Company and its subsidiaries (provided that Parent may substitute
therefor policies of at least the same coverage and amounts containing terms and
conditions that are no less advantageous to the Indemnified Parties, and which
coverages and amounts shall be no less than the coverages and amounts provided
at that time for Parent's directors and officers) with respect to matters
arising on or before the Effective Time; provided, however, that Parent and the
Surviving Corporation shall not be required to expend in any year an amount in
excess of 125% of the annual aggregate premiums currently paid by the Company
for such insurance; and provided, further, that if the annual premiums of such
insurance coverage exceed such amount, Parent and the Surviving Corporation
shall be obligated to obtain a policy with the best coverage available, in the
reasonable judgment of the Parent's board of directors, for a cost not exceeding
such amount.
(e) The indemnification rights of the Indemnified Parties granted under (i)
this Agreement, (ii) the Articles and Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation, as
amended, and (iii) the CBCA, are the only indemnification rights available to
the Indemnified Parties and supersede any other rights to indemnification under
any other agreement. The provisions of this Section 5.11 shall survive the
consummation of the Merger and expressly are intended to benefit and be binding
upon each of the Indemnified Parties.
(f) Parent hereby fully and unconditionally guarantees the performance of
the Surviving Company's obligations under Sections 5.11(a)-(c). This guaranty is
a guaranty of payment and not performance.
Section 5.12. Financing. As a condition precedent to the Company's
----------
obligation to mail the Proxy Statement to the Company's stockholders in
accordance with Section 5.07 of this Agreement, Parent shall deliver to the
Company an executed, written "highly confident" letter from U.S. Bancorp Libra
or one or more similar lending institutions (each, a "Letter") that it can
arrange, in the aggregate, financing sufficient to fund the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including, without limitation, the
Merger, and to satisfy all other costs and expenses arising in connection with
this Agreement (the "Financing"). Parent shall use its reasonable efforts to
consummate the Financing on terms and conditions consistent with the Letters or
such other Financing on terms as shall be reasonably satisfactory to Parent, on
or before the Closing Date; but reasonable efforts of Parent as used in this
Section 5.12 shall in no event require Parent to agree to financing terms
materially more adverse to Parent than those provided for in the Letters. Parent
shall use its reasonable efforts to satisfy before the Closing Date all
requirements that are conditions to the closing of the transactions that
constitute the Financing and to obtaining the cash proceeds of the Financing.
Parent shall keep the Company informed about the status of the Financing,
including, but not limited to, providing copies of financing documents and
informing the Company of the termination of any Letter. The Company shall use
its reasonable efforts to assist and cooperate with Parent to satisfy on or
before the Closing Date all of the conditions to closing the transactions
constituting the Financing that are applicable to the Company.
Section 5.13. Parent Letter of Credit. Contemporaneously with the
-----------------------
execution of this Agreement, Parent shall provide the Company with a letter of
credit in favor of the Company in the amount of $2,000,000 and issued by a bank
acceptable to the Company, to secure Parent's obligations under Section 5.09(c)
of this Agreement. Parent shall maintain that letter of credit until the earlier
of the Effective Time and the Outside Date. The Company is entitled to draw
against the letter of credit only if (i) its Board of Directors has determined
in good faith, after consultation with the Company's counsel, that the Company
has become entitled, or is reasonably likely to become
-18-
entitled by a specified date and time, to the fee payable under Section 5.09(c)
of this Agreement (the "Fee"), (ii) the Company has given to Parent written
notice, at least one business day in advance, of its intention to draw against
the letter of credit at a specified date and time and has endeavored in good
faith to consult with Parent concerning whether the Fee is payable, and (iii)
Parent has neither consummated the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
nor paid the Fee by the later of (x) 24 hours after the notice referred to in
clause (ii), above, has been delivered (or deemed delivered in accordance with
Section 8.03 of this Agreement) and (y) the date and time specified in that
notice. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to preclude Parent from contesting
in a court of competent jurisdiction the Company's entitlement to the Fee or the
Company's entitlement to draw against the letter of credit if Parent determines
in good faith, after consultation with its counsel, that the Company is not
entitled to the Fee.
ARTICLE VI
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
Section 6.01. Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party. The
-------------------------------------------
obligations_of the Company, Parent and Merger Subsidiary to consummate the
Merger are subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions:
(a) this Agreement and the Merger shall have been adopted by the requisite
vote of the stockholders of the Company in accordance with CBCA (the "Company
Stockholders' Approval");
(b) none of the parties hereto shall be subject to any order or injunction
of any governmental authority of competent jurisdiction that prohibits the
consummation of the Merger. In the event any such order or injunction shall have
been issued, each party agrees to use its reasonable best efforts to have any
such order overturned or injunction lifted; and
(c) the waiting period with respect to consummation of the Merger under the
HSR Act, if applicable, shall have expired or been terminated.
Section 6.02. Conditions to Obligation of the Company to Effect the
-----------------------------------------------------
Merger. Unless waived by the Company, the obligation of the Company to effect
- ------
the Merger shall be subject to the fulfillment at or prior to the Effective Time
of the following additional conditions:
(a) Parent and Merger Subsidiary shall have performed in all material
respects their agreements contained in this Agreement required to be performed
on or prior to the Effective Time and the representations and warranties of
Parent and Merger Subsidiary contained in this Agreement shall be true and
correct on and as of the Effective Time as if made at and as of such date
(except to the extent that such representations and warranties speak as of an
earlier date), except for such failures to perform or to be true and correct
that would not reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material Adverse Effect,
and the Company shall have received a certificate of the chief executive officer
or the chief financial officer of Parent to that effect; and
(b) all Parent Statutory Approvals and Company Statutory Approvals required
to be obtained in order to permit consummation of the Merger under applicable
law shall have been obtained, except for any such Parent Statutory Approvals or
Company Statutory Approvals whose unavailability would not, singly or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to (i) have a Company Material Adverse Effect
after giving effect to the Merger, or (ii) result in the Company or its
subsidiaries failing to meet the standards for licensing, suitability or
character under any Gaming Laws relating to the conduct of Parent's or the
Company's business which (after taking into account the anticipated impact of
such failure to so meet such standards on other authorities) would reasonably be
expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect (after giving effect to the
Merger).
Section 6.03. Conditions to Obligations of Parent and Subsidiary to Effect
- ------------------------------------------------------------
the Merger. Unless waived by Parent and Merger Subsidiary, the obligations of
- ----------
Parent and Merger Subsidiary to effect the Merger shall be subject to the
fulfillment at or prior to the Effective Time of the additional following
conditions:
(a) the Company shall have performed in all material respects its
agreements contained in this Agreement required to be performed on or prior to
the Effective Time and the representations and warranties of the Company
contained in this Agreement shall be true and correct on and as of the Effective
Time as if made at and as
-19-
of such date (except to the extent that such representations and warranties
speak as of an earlier date), except for such failures to perform and to be true
and correct that would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect or, in the case of Section 4.02(a), shall be true and correct
when made except for immaterial exceptions thereto, and Parent shall have
received a certificate of the chief executive officer or the chief financial
officer of the Company to that effect; and
(b) all Parent Statutory Approvals and Company Statutory Approvals required
to be obtained in order to permit consummation of the Merger under applicable
law shall have been obtained, except for any such Parent Statutory Approvals or
Company Statutory Approvals whose unavailability would not reasonably be
expected to (i) have a Parent Material Adverse Effect, or (ii) result in Parent
or its subsidiaries failing to meet the standards for licensing, suitability or
character under any Gaming Laws relating to the conduct of Parent's or the
Company's business which (after taking into account the anticipated impact of
such failure to so meet such standards on other authorities) would reasonably be
expected to have a Parent Material Adverse Effect (after giving effect to the
Merger).
(c) The number of Dissenting Shares shall constitute not more than 10% of
the shares of Company Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time.
ARTICLE VII
TERMINATION
Section 7.01. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the
-----------
Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time (notwithstanding
any approval of this Agreement by the stockholders of the Company):
(i) by mutual written consent of the Company, Parent and Merger
Subsidiary;
(ii) by either the Company or Parent, if the Merger has not been
consummated by December 31, 2001, provided that the right
to terminate this Agreement under this clause (ii) shall
not be available to any party whose failure to fulfill any
of its obligations under this Agreement has been the cause
of or resulted in the failure to consummate the Merger by
such date(the "Outside Date");
(iii) by either the Company or Parent if any judgment,
injunction, order or decree of a court or governmental
agency or authority of competent jurisdiction shall
restrain or prohibit the consummation of the Merger, and
such judgment, injunction, order or decree shall become
final and nonappealable and was not entered at the request
of the terminating party;
(iv) by either the Company or Parent, if (x) there has been a
breach by the other party of any representation or warranty
contained in this Agreement which has not been cured in all
material respects within 30 days after written notice of
such breach by the terminating party, or (y) there has been
a breach of any of the covenants or agreements set forth in
this Agreement on the part of the other party, which is not
curable or, if curable, is not cured within 30 days after
written notice of such breach is given by the terminating
party to the other party;
(v) by the Company if, prior to receipt of the Company
Stockholders' Approval, the Company receives a Superior
Proposal, resolves to accept such Superior Proposal, and
shall have given Parent two days' prior written notice of
its intention to terminate pursuant to this provision;
provided, however, that such termination shall not be
effective until such time as the payment required by
Section 5.09(b) shall have been received by Parent;
-20-
(vi) by the Parent, if the Board of Directors of the Company
shall have failed to recommend, or shall have withdrawn,
modified or amended in any material respect its approval
or recommendation of the Merger or shall have resolved to
do any of the foregoing, or shall have recommended another
Acquisition Proposal or if the Board of Directors of the
Company shall have resolved to accept a Superior Proposal
or shall have recommended to the stockholders of the
Company that they tender their shares in a tender or an
exchange offer commenced by a third party (excluding any
affiliate of Parent or any group of which any affiliate of
Parent is a member); or
(vii) by Parent or the Company if the stockholders of the
Company fail to approve the Merger pursuant to the CBCA at
a duly held meeting of stockholders called for such
purpose (including any adjournment or postponement
thereof).
ARTICLE VIII
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 8.01. Effect of Termination. In the event of termination of this
---------------------
Agreement by either Parent or the Company pursuant to Section 7.01, this
Agreement shall forthwith become void and there shall be no liability or further
obligation on the part of the Company, Parent, Merger Subsidiary or their
respective officers or directors (except as set forth in this Section 8.01, in
the second sentence of Section 5.04 and in Section 5.09, all of which shall
survive the termination). Nothing in this Section 8.01 shall relieve any party
from liability for any breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or
agreement of such party contained in this Agreement, except that if the fee
provided for in Section 5.09(b) or the fee provided for in Section 5.09(c)
becomes payable in accordance therewith, that fee will constitute the exclusive
remedy of and the sole amount payable to the party entitled thereto with respect
to the event or circumstances in connection with which that fee becomes so
payable.
Section 8.02. Nonsurvival of Representations and Warranties. No
----------------------------------------------
representation, warranty or agreement in this Agreement or in any instrument
delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall survive the Merger, and after
effectiveness of the Merger neither the Company, Parent, Merger Subsidiary nor
any of their respective officers or directors shall have any further obligation
with respect thereto except for the agreements contained in Articles I, II and
VIII and Section 5.11.
Section 8.03. Notices. All notices and other communications hereunder
--------
shall be in writing and shall be considered given if delivered personally,
mailed by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested) or sent via
facsimile to the parties at the following addresses (or at such other address
for a party as shall be specified by like notice):
If to the Company:
Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc.
P.O. Box 21
240 Main Street
Black Hawk, Colorado 80422
Attention: Stephen R. Roark, President
Telephone: 303/582-1117
Telecopier: 303/582-0239
with a copy to:
Samuel E. Wing, Esq.
Jones & Keller, P.C.
1625 Broadway, Suite 1600
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: 303/573-1600
Telecopier: 303/573-0769
-21-
J. Patrick McDuff, Chairman
Special Committee of the Board of Directors
Of Black Hawk Gaming & Development
Company, Inc.
McDuff Interests, LLC
2909 4th Street
Boulder, Colorado 80304
Telephone: 303/443-0018
Telecopier: 419/791-9181
Ronald R. Levine, II
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP
Suite 500, 1550 17/th/ Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: 303/892-7514
Telecopier: 303/893-1379
If to Parent or Merger Subsidiary:
GameCo 1001 North U.S. Highway One, No. 710
Jupiter, Florida 33477
Attention: Jeffrey P. Jacobs
Telephone: 561/575-4006
Telecopier: 561/575-1526
with a copy to:
Baker & Hostetler LLP
3200 National City Center
1900 East Ninth Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3485
Telephone: 216/861-7553
Telecopier: 216/696-0740
Attn: Edward G. Ptaszek, Jr.
Section 8.04. Interpretation. The headings contained in this
--------------
Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the
meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. In this Agreement, unless a
contrary intention appears, (i) the words "herein," "hereof" and "hereunder" and
other words of similar import refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any
particular Article, Section or other subdivision, (ii) "knowledge" shall mean
actual knowledge of the executive officers of the Company or Parent, as
applicable, and (iii) reference to any Article or Section means such Article or
Section hereof.
Section 8.05. Miscellaneous. This Agreement (including the documents
-------------
and instruments referred to herein) shall not be assigned by operation of law or
otherwise except that Merger Subsidiary may assign its obligations under this
Agreement to any other wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent subject to the terms of
this Agreement, in which case such assignee shall become the "Merger Subsidiary"
for all purposes of this Agreement. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED IN ALL
RESPECTS, INCLUDING VALIDITY, INTERPRETATION AND EFFECT, BY THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF COLORADO APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS EXECUTED AND TO BE PERFORMED WHOLLY
WITHIN SUCH STATE, WITHOUT REGARD TO THE CONFLICTS OF LAWS OF THAT STATE.
Section 8.06. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or
------------
more counterparts, each of which shall be considered to be an original, but all
of which shall constitute one and the same agreement.
-22-
Section 8.07. Amendments; No Waivers. (a) Any provision of this
----------
Agreement may be amended or waived prior to the Effective Time if, and only if,
such amendment or waiver is in writing and signed, in the case of an amendment,
by the Company, Parent and Merger Subsidiary or, in the case of a waiver, by the
party against whom the waiver is to be effective; however, any waiver or
amendment shall be effective against a party only if the board of directors of
such party approves such waiver or amendment.
(b) No failure or delay by any party in exercising any right, power
or privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof nor shall any single or
partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the
exercise of any other right, power or privilege. The rights and remedies herein
provided shall be cumulative and not exclusive of any rights or remedies
provided by law.
Section 8.08. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the
----------------
Confidentiality Agreement constitute the entire agreement between the parties
with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior agreements,
understandings and negotiations, both written and oral, between the parties with
respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. No representation, inducement,
promise, understanding, condition or warranty not set forth herein has been made
or relied upon by either party hereto. Neither this Agreement nor any provision
hereof is intended to confer upon any person other than the parties hereto any
rights or remedies hereunder except for Section 5.11, which is intended for the
benefit of the Company's former and present officers, directors, employees and
agents, and Articles I and II, which are intended for the benefit of the
Company's stockholders, including holders of Options.
Section 8.09. Severability. If any term or other provision of this
------------
Agreement is invalid, illegal or unenforceable, all other provisions of this
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect so long as the economic or legal
substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner
materially adverse to any party.
Section 8.10. Specific Performance. The parties hereto agree that
--------------------
irreparable damage would occur if any of the provisions of this Agreement were
not to be performed in accordance with the terms hereof and that the parties
shall be entitled to specific performance of the terms hereof in addition to any
other remedies at law or in equity.
[Signature page to follow]
-23-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
duly executed by their respective authorized officers as of the day and
year first above written.
BLACK HAWK GAMING & DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY, INC.
/s/ Stephen R. Roark
-------------------------------
Name: Stephen R. Roark
--------------------------
Title: President
-------------------------
GAMECO, INC
/s/ Jeffrey P. Jacobs
-------------------------------
Name: Jeffrey P. Jacobs
-------------------------
Title: President
------------------------
Merger Subsidiary:
BH ACQUISITION, INC.
/s/ Jeffrey P. Jacobs
-------------------------------
Name: Jeffrey P. Jacobs
-------------------------
Title: President
------------------------
-24-
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
DATED AS OF
November 12, 2001
AMONG
BLACK HAWK GAMING & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.,
GAMECO, INC.
AND
BH ACQUISITION, INC.
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
This AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this "Amendment") is
entered into as of November 12, 2001 by and among Gameco, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("Parent"), BH Acquisition, Inc., a Colorado corporation and wholly
owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Subsidiary"), and Black Hawk Gaming &
Development Company, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the "Company"). Parent,
Merger Subsidiary and the Company are referred to collectively herein as the
"Parties."
WHEREAS, the Parties are parties to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
as of April 25, 2001 (the "Merger Agreement"), which permits any party thereto
to terminate the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances if the
transactions provided for therein are not consummated on or before December 31,
2001;
WHEREAS, the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York City and
Washington, D.C. and ensuing events have disrupted the financial markets and
made it impracticable for Parent and the Company to obtain the contemplated
financing to consummate those transactions on or before December 31, 2001; and
WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing and the Parties' continuing belief that
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement is in the
best interests of the Parties and of the Company's shareholders, the Parties
desire to extend the date on which the Merger Agreement may be so terminated;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the respective
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth herein, the
parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. Parent and Merger Subsidiary Representations and Warranties.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Parent and Merger Subsidiary jointly and severally represent and warrant to the
Company that (a) each of Parent and Merger Subsidiary has full corporate power
and authority to enter into this Amendment, (b) this Amendment has been approved
and adopted by the Boards of Directors of Parent and Merger Subsidiary and
Parent as the sole stockholder of Merger Subsidiary, and no other corporate or
similar proceeding on the part of Parent or Merger Subsidiary is necessary to
authorize the execution and delivery of this Amendment, and (c) this Amendment
has been duly executed and delivered by each of Parent and Merger Subsidiary
and, assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery hereof by the
Company, constitutes a valid and legally binding agreement of each of Parent and
Merger Subsidiary enforceable against each of them in accordance with its terms,
except that such enforcement may be subject to (i) bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws affecting or relating to
enforcement of creditors' rights generally and (ii) general equitable
principles.
Section 2. Company Representations and Warranties. The Company represents
--------------------------------------
and warrants to Parent and Merger Subsidiary that (a) the Company has the
requisite corporate power and authority to enter into this Amendment, (b) this
Amendment has been approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the
Company, and no other corporate proceedings on the part of the Company are
necessary to authorize the execution and delivery of this Amendment, and (c)
this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by the Company, and,
assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery hereof by Parent and
Merger Subsidiary, constitutes a valid and legally binding agreement of the
Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms, except
that such enforcement may be subject to (i) bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws affecting or relating to
enforcement of creditors' rights generally and (ii) general equitable
principles.
Section 3. Amendment. The parties hereby amend the Merger Agreement by
---------
deleting the phrase "December 31, 2001" in section 7.01(ii) of the Merger
Agreement and inserting in lieu thereof the phrase "April 1, 2002."
Section 4. Effect. The Merger Agreement, as amended hereby, remains in
------
full force and effect, and all references therein to the "Agreement" refer to
the Merger Agreement as amended by this Amendment, except where the context
requires otherwise.
[Signature page to follow]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
duly executed by their respective authorized officers as of the day and year
first above written.
BLACK HAWK GAMING & DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY, INC.
/s/ Stephen R. Roark
---------------------------------
Name: Stephen R. Roark
---------------------------
Title: President
--------------------------
GAMECO, INC.
/s/ Jeffrey P. Jacobs
---------------------------------
Name: Jeffrey P. Jacobs
---------------------------
Title: Chief Executive Officer
--------------------------
Merger Subsidiary:
BH ACQUISITION, INC.
/s/ Jeffrey P. Jacobs
----------------------------------
Name: Jeffrey P. Jacobs
---------------------------
Title: Chief Executive Officer
---------------------------
-2-
ANNEX B
April 23, 2001
Special Committee of the Board of Directors
Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc.
240 Main Street Black
Hawk, Colorado 80422
Members of the Special Committee:
We understand that Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc. (the
"Company"), Gameco, Inc. ("Acquiror"), and BH Acquisition, Inc. (a wholly owned
subsidiary of Acquiror, "Merger Subsidiary") are proposing to enter into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Agreement") which will provide, among other
things, for the merger (the "Merger") of Merger Subsidiary with and into the
Company. We have been furnished a draft of the Agreement dated April 20, 2001
(the "Draft Agreement"). Upon consummation of the Merger, the Company will
become a wholly owned subsidiary of Acquiror. Under the terms, and subject to
the conditions, set forth in the Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger,
the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, par value $.001 per share
("Company Common Stock") other than certain shares to be canceled pursuant to
the Agreement and shares held by stockholders who properly exercise dissenters'
rights ("Dissenting Shares"), will be converted into the right to receive an
aggregate of $12.00 per share in cash (the "Merger Consideration").
Acquiror has been organized for the purpose of acquiring the Company
pursuant to the Merger by Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and the beneficial owner of approximately 33.6%
of the outstanding Company Common Stock. We understand that Mr. Jacobs is the
owner of the majority of the outstanding capital stock of Acquiror.
You have asked us whether, in our opinion, the Merger Consideration is fair
from a financial point of view and as of the date hereof to the Stockholders of
the Company. As used herein, the term "Stockholders of the Company" does not
include Acquiror, Merger Subsidiary, any other affiliates of Mr. Jacobs and any
members of management of the Company who may receive an ownership interest in
Acquiror.
For purposes of this opinion we have, among other things:
(i) reviewed the Company's annual reports to stockholders and its
annual, quarterly and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1999, December 31, 2000 and
up to and including the date of this letter;
(ii) reviewed certain internal financial statements and other financial
and operating data, including certain financial forecasts and other forward
looking information, concerning the Company prepared by the management of the
Company;
(iii) held discussions with the management of the Company concerning the
business, past and current operations, financial condition and future prospects
of the Company;
(iv) reviewed the financial terms and conditions set forth in the Draft
Agreement;
(v) reviewed the stock price and trading history of the Company Common
Stock;
(vi) compared the financial performance of the Company and the prices and
trading activity of the Company Common Stock with those of certain other
publicly traded companies comparable with the Company;
(vii) compared the financial terms of the Merger with the financial terms,
to the extent publicly available, of other transactions that we deemed relevant;
Special Committee of the Board of Directors
Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc.
April 23, 2001
Page 2
(viii) prepared a discounted cash flow analysis of the Company;
(ix) participated in discussions and negotiations among representatives
of the Company and Acquiror and their financial and legal advisors; and
(x) made such other studies and inquiries, and reviewed such other
data, as we deemed relevant.
In our review and analysis, and in arriving at our opinion, we have assumed
and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other
information provided to us (including information furnished to us orally or
otherwise discussed with us by the Company's management) or publicly available
and have neither attempted to verify, nor assumed responsibility for verifying,
any of such information. We have relied upon the assurances of the Company's
management that it is not aware of any facts that would make such information
inaccurate or misleading. Furthermore, we did not obtain or make, or assume any
responsibility for assuming or making, any independent evaluation or appraisal
of the properties, assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of the
Company, nor were we furnished with any such evaluation or appraisal. With
respect to the financial forecasts and projections (and the assumptions and
bases therefor) for the Company that we have reviewed, we have assumed that such
forecasts and projections have been reasonably prepared in good faith on the
basis of reasonable assumptions and reflect the best currently available
estimates and judgments as to the future financial condition and performance of
the Company, and we have further assumed that such projections and forecasts
will be realized in the amounts and in the time periods currently estimated. We
have assumed that the Merger will be consummated upon the terms set forth in the
Draft Agreement without material alteration thereof. In addition, we have
assumed that the historical financial statements of the Company reviewed by us
have been prepared and fairly presented in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles consistently applied. We have relied as to all
legal matters relevant to rendering our opinion on the advice of counsel.
This opinion is necessarily based upon market, economic and other
conditions as in effect on, and information made available to us as of, the date
hereof. It should be understood that subsequent developments may affect the
conclusion expressed in this opinion and that we disclaim any undertaking or
obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter affecting this
opinion which may come or be brought to our attention after the date of this
opinion. Our opinion is limited to the fairness of the Merger Consideration,
from a financial point of view and as to the date hereof, to the Stockholders of
the Company. We do not express any opinion as to (i) the value of any employee
agreement or other arrangement entered into in connection with the Merger or
(ii) any tax or other consequences that might result from the Merger. Our
opinion does not address the relative merits of the Merger and any alternative
transaction or business strategies that the Company's Board of Directors has
considered or might consider, nor does it address the decision of the Company's
Board of Directors to proceed with the Merger.
We are acting as financial advisor to the Special Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Company in connection with the Merger and will receive (i) a
fee contingent upon the delivery of this opinion and (ii) an additional fee
contingent upon the consummation of the Merger. In addition, the Company has
agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities that may arise out of our
engagement. In the ordinary course of business, we may trade in the Company's
securities for our own account and the account of our customers and,
accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in the Company's
securities.
Our opinion expressed herein is provided for the information of the Special
Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company in connection with its
evaluation of the Merger. Our opinion is not intended to be and does not
constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of the Company as to how such
stockholder should vote, or take any other action, with respect to the Merger.
This opinion may not be summarized, described or referred to or furnished to any
party except with our express prior written consent.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing considerations, it is our opinion
that, as of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration is fair to the
Stockholders of the Company from a financial point of view.
Very truly yours,
/S/ ROBERTSON STEPHENS, INC.
ANNEX C
(i) Dissenter's Rights Under the Colorado Business Corporation Act
(S) 7-113-101. Definitions
For purposes of this article:
(1) "Beneficial shareholder" means the beneficial owner of shares held in
a voting trust or by a nominee as the record shareholder.
(2) "Corporation" means the issuer of the shares held by a dissenter
before the corporate action, or the surviving or acquiring domestic or
foreign corporation, by merger or share exchange of that issuer.
(3) "Dissenter" means a shareholder who is entitled to dissent from
corporate action under section 7-113-102 and who exercises that right
at the time and in the manner required by part 2 of this article.
(4) "Fair value", with respect to a dissenter's shares, means the value of
the shares immediately before the effective date of the corporate
action to which the dissenter objects, excluding any appreciation or
depreciation in anticipation of the corporate action except to the
extent that exclusion would be inequitable.
(5) "Interest" means interest from the effective date of the corporate
action until the date of payment, at the average rate currently paid
by the corporation on its principal bank loans or, if none, at the
legal rate as specified in section 5-12-101, C.R.S.
(6) "Record shareholder" means the person in whose name shares are
registered in the records of a corporation or the beneficial owner of
shares that are registered in the name of a nominee to the extent such
owner is recognized by the corporation as the shareholder as provided
in section 7-107-204.
(7) "Shareholder" means either a record shareholder or a beneficial
shareholder.
(S) 7-113-102. Right to dissent
(1) A shareholder, whether or not entitled to vote, is entitled to dissent
and obtain payment of the fair value of the shareholder's shares in
the event of any of the following corporate actions:
(a) Consummation of a plan of merger to which the corporation is a
party if:
(I) Approval by the shareholders of that corporation is required
for the merger by section 7-111-103 or 7-111-104 or by the
articles of incorporation; or
(II) The corporation is a subsidiary that is merged with its
parent corporation under section 7-111-104;
(b) Consummation of a plan of share exchange to which the corporation
is a party as the corporation whose shares will be acquired;
(c) Consummation of a sale, lease, exchange, or other disposition of
all, or substantially all, of the property of the corporation for
which a shareholder vote is required under section 7-112-102(1);
and
(d) Consummation of a sale, lease, exchange, or other disposition of
all, or substantially all, of the property of an entity
controlled by the corporation if the shareholders of the
corporation were entitled to vote upon the consent of the
corporation to the disposition pursuant to section 7-112-102(2).
(1.3) A shareholder is not entitled to dissent and obtain payment, under
subsection (1) of this section, of the fair value of the shares of any
class or series of shares which either were listed on a national
securities exchange registered under the federal "Securities Exchange
Act of 1934", as amended, [FN1] or on the national market system of
the national association of securities dealers automated quotation
system, or were held of record by more than two thousand shareholders,
at the time of:
(a) The record date fixed under section 7-107-107 to determine the
shareholders entitled to receive notice of the shareholders'
meeting at which the corporate action is submitted to a vote;
-1-
(b) The record date fixed under section 7-107-104 to determine
shareholders entitled to sign writings consenting to the
corporate action; or
(c) The effective date of the corporate action if the corporate
action is authorized other than by a vote of shareholders.
(1.8) The limitation set forth in subsection (1.3) of this section shall not
apply if the shareholder will receive for the shareholder's shares,
pursuant to the corporate action, anything except:
(a) Shares of the corporation surviving the consummation of the plan
of merger or share exchange;
(b) Shares of any other corporation which at the effective date of
the plan of merger or share exchange either will be listed on a
national securities exchange registered under the federal
"Securities Exchange Act of 1934", as amended, or on the national
market system of the national association of securities dealers
automated quotation system, or will be held of record by more
than two thousand shareholders;
(c) Cash in lieu of fractional shares; or
(d) Any combination of the foregoing described shares or cash in lieu
of fractional shares.
(2) Deleted by Laws 1996, H.B.96-1285, (S) 30, eff. June 1, 1996.
(2.5) A shareholder, whether or not entitled to vote, is entitled to dissent
and obtain payment of the fair value of the shareholder's shares in
the event of a reverse split that reduces the number of shares owned
by the shareholder to a fraction of a share or to scrip if the
fractional share or scrip so created is to be acquired for cash or the
scrip is to be voided under section 7-106-104.
(3) A shareholder is entitled to dissent and obtain payment of the fair
value of the shareholder's shares in the event of any corporate action
to the extent provided by the bylaws or a resolution of the board of
directors.
(4) A shareholder entitled to dissent and obtain payment for the
shareholder's shares under this article may not challenge the
corporate action creating such entitlement unless the action is
unlawful or fraudulent with respect to the shareholder or the
corporation.
(S) 7-113-103. Dissent by nominees and beneficial owners
(1) A record shareholder may assert dissenters' rights as to fewer than
all the shares registered in the record shareholder's name only if the
record shareholder dissents with respect to all shares beneficially
owned by any one person and causes the corporation to receive written
notice which states such dissent and the name, address, and federal
taxpayer identification number, if any, of each person on whose behalf
the record shareholder asserts dissenters' rights. The rights of a
record shareholder under this subsection (1) are determined as if the
shares as to which the record shareholder dissents and the other
shares of the record shareholder were registered in the names of
different shareholders.
(2) A beneficial shareholder may assert dissenters' rights as to The
shares held on the beneficial shareholder's behalf only if:
(a) The beneficial shareholder causes the corporation to receive the
record shareholder's written consent to the dissent not later
than the time the beneficial shareholder asserts dissenters'
rights; and
(b) The beneficial shareholder dissents with respect to all shares
beneficially owned by the beneficial shareholder.
(3) The corporation may require that, when a record shareholder dissents
with respect to the shares held by any one or more beneficial
shareholders, each such beneficial shareholder must certify to the
corporation that the beneficial shareholder and the record shareholder
or record shareholders of all shares owned beneficially by the
beneficial shareholder have asserted, or will timely assert,
dissenters' rights as to all such shares as to which there is no
limitation on the ability to exercise dissenters' rights. Any such
requirement shall be stated in the dissenters' notice given pursuant
to section 7-113-203.
(S) 7-113-201. Notice of dissenters' rights
-2-
(1) If a proposed corporate action creating dissenters' rights under
section 7-113-102 is submitted to a vote at a shareholders' meeting,
the notice of the meeting shall be given to all shareholders, whether
or not entitled to vote. The notice shall state that shareholders are
or may be entitled to assert dissenters' rights under this article and
shall be accompanied by a copy of this article and the materials, if
any, that, under articles 101 to 117 of this title, are required to be
given to shareholders entitled to vote on the proposed action at the
meeting. Failure to give notice as provided by this subsection (1)
shall not affect any action taken at the shareholders' meeting for
which the notice was to have been given, but any shareholder who was
entitled to dissent but who was not given such notice shall not be
precluded from demanding payment for the shareholder's shares under
this article by reason of the shareholder's failure to comply with the
provisions of section 7- 113-202(1).
(2) If a proposed corporate action creating dissenters' rights under
section 7-113-102 is authorized without a meeting of shareholders
pursuant to section 7-107-104, any written or oral solicitation of a
shareholder to execute a writing consenting to such action
contemplated in section 7-107-104 shall be accompanied or preceded by
a written notice stating that shareholders are or may be entitled to
assert dissenters' rights under this article, by a copy of this
article, and by the materials, if any, that, under articles 101 to 117
of this title, would have been required to be given to shareholders
entitled to vote on the proposed action if the proposed action were
submitted to a vote at a shareholders' meeting. Failure to give
notice as provided by this subsection (2) shall not affect any action
taken pursuant to section 7-107-104 for which the notice was to have
been given, but any shareholder who was entitled to dissent but who
was not given such notice shall not be precluded from demanding
payment for the shareholder's shares under this article by reason of
the shareholder's failure to comply with the provisions of section 7-
113-202(2).
(S) 7-113-202. Notice of intent to demand payment
(1) If a proposed corporate action creating dissenters' rights under
section 7-113-102 is submitted to a vote at a shareholders' meeting
and if notice of dissenters' rights has been given to such shareholder
in connection with the action pursuant to section 7-113-201(1), a
shareholder who wishes to assert dissenters' rights shall:
(a) Cause the corporation to receive, before the vote is taken,
written notice of the shareholder's intention to demand payment
for the shareholder's shares if the proposed corporate action is
effectuated; and
(b) Not vote the shares in favor of the proposed corporate action.
(2) If a proposed corporate action creating dissenters' rights under
section 7-113-102 is authorized without a meeting of shareholders
pursuant to section 7-107-104 and if notice of dissenters' rights has
been given to such shareholder in connection with the action pursuant
to section 7-113-201(2) a shareholder who wishes to assert dissenters'
rights shall not execute a writing consenting to the proposed
corporate action.
(3) A shareholder who does not satisfy the requirements of subsection (1)
or (2) of this section is not entitled to demand payment for the
shareholder's shares under this article.
(S) 7-113-203. Dissenters' notice
(1) If a proposed corporate action creating dissenters' rights under
section 7-113-102 is authorized, the corporation shall give a written
dissenters' notice to all shareholders who are entitled to demand
payment for their shares under this article.
(2) The dissenters' notice required by subsection (1) of this section
shall be given no later than ten days after the effective date of the
corporate action creating dissenters' rights under section 7-113-102
and shall:
(a) State that the corporate action was authorized and state the
effective date or proposed effective date of the corporate
action;
(b) State an address at which the corporation will receive payment
demands and the address of a place where certificates for
certificated shares must be deposited;
-3-
(c) Inform holders of uncertificated shares to what extent transfer
of the shares will be restricted after the payment demand is
received;
(d) Supply a form for demanding payment, which form shall request a
dissenter to state an address to which payment is to be made;
(e) Set the date by which the corporation must receive the payment
demand and certificates for certificated shares, which date shall
not be less than thirty days after the date the notice required
by subsection (1) of this section is given;
(f) State the requirement contemplated in section 7-113-103(3), if
such requirement is imposed; and
(g) Be accompanied by a copy of this article.
(S) 7-113-204. Procedure to demand payment
(1) A shareholder who is given a dissenters' notice pursuant to section 7-
113- 203 and who wishes to assert dissenters' rights shall, in
accordance with the terms of the dissenters' notice:
(a) Cause the corporation to receive a payment demand, which may be
the payment demand form contemplated in section 7-113-203(2)(d),
duly completed, or may be stated in another writing; and
(b) Deposit the shareholder's certificates for certificated shares.
(2) A shareholder who demands payment in accordance with subsection (1) of
this section retains all rights of a shareholder, except the right to
transfer the shares, until the effective date of the proposed
corporate action giving rise to the shareholder's exercise of
dissenters' rights and has only the right to receive payment for the
shares after the effective date of such corporate action.
(3) Except as provided in section 7-113-207 or 7-113-209(1)(b), the demand
for payment and deposit of certificates are irrevocable.
(4) A shareholder who does not demand payment and deposit the
shareholder's share certificates as required by the date or dates set
in the dissenters' notice is not entitled to payment for the shares
under this article.
(S) 7-113-205. Uncertificated shares
(1) Upon receipt of a demand for payment under section 7-113-204 from a
shareholder holding uncertificated shares, and in lieu of the deposit
of certificates representing the shares, the corporation may restrict
the transfer thereof.
(2) In all other respects, the provisions of section 7-113-204 shall be
applicable to shareholders who own uncertificated shares.
(S) 7-113-206. Payment
(1) Except as provided in section 7-113-208, upon the effective date of
the corporate action creating dissenters' rights under section 7-113-
102 or upon receipt of a payment demand pursuant to section 7-113-204,
whichever is later, the corporation shall pay each dissenter who
complied with section 7-113-204, at the address stated in the payment
demand, or if no such address is stated in the payment demand, at the
address shown on the corporation's current record of shareholders for
the record shareholder holding the dissenter's shares, the amount the
corporation estimates to be the fair value of the dissenter's shares,
plus accrued interest.
(2) The payment made pursuant to subsection (1) of this section shall be
accompanied by:
(a) The corporation's balance sheet as of the end of its most recent
fiscal year or, if that is not available, the corporation's
balance sheet as of the end of a fiscal year ending not more than
sixteen months before the date of payment, an income statement
for that year, and, if the corporation customarily provides such
statements to shareholders, a statement of changes in
shareholders' equity for that year and a statement of cash flow
for that year, which balance sheet and statements shall have been
audited if the corporation customarily provides audited financial
statements to shareholders, as well as the latest available
-4-
financial statements, if any, for the interim or full-year
period, which financial statements need not be audited;
(b) A statement of the corporation's estimate of the fair value of
the shares;
(c) An explanation of how the interest was calculated;
(d) A statement of the dissenter's right to demand payment under
section 7-113-209; and
(e) A copy of this article.
(S) 7-113-207. Failure to take action
(1) If the effective date of the corporate action creating dissenters'
rights under section 7-113-102 does not occur within sixty days after
the date set by the corporation by which the corporation must receive
the payment demand as provided in section 7-113-203, the corporation
shall return the deposited certificates and release the transfer
restrictions imposed on uncertificated shares.
(2) If the effective date of the corporate action creating dissenters'
rights under section 7-113-102 occurs more than sixty days after the
date set by the corporation by which the corporation must receive the
payment demand as provided in section 7-113-203, then the corporation
shall send a new dissenters' notice, as provided in section 7-113-203,
and the provisions of sections 7-113-204 to 7-113-209 shall again be
applicable.
(S) 7-113-208. Special provisions relating to shares acquired after
announcement of proposed corporate action
(1) The corporation may, in or with the dissenters' notice given pursuant
to section 7-113-203, state the date of the first announcement to news
media or to shareholders of the terms of the proposed corporate action
creating dissenters' rights under section 7-113-102 and state that the
dissenter shall certify in writing, in or with the dissenter's payment
demand under section 7-113-204, whether or not the dissenter (or the
person on whose behalf dissenters' rights are asserted) acquired
beneficial ownership of the shares before that date. With respect to
any dissenter who does not so certify in writing, in or with the
payment demand, that the dissenter or the person on whose behalf the
dissenter asserts dissenters' rights acquired beneficial ownership of
the shares before such date, the corporation may, in lieu of making
the payment provided in section 7-113-206, offer to make such payment
if the dissenter agrees to accept it in full satisfaction of the
demand.
(2) An offer to make payment under subsection (1) of this section shall
include or be accompanied by the information required by section 7-
113-206(2).
(S) 7-113-209. Procedure if dissenter is dissatisfied with payment or offer
(1) A dissenter may give notice to the corporation in writing of the
dissenter's estimate of the fair value of the dissenter's shares and
of the amount of interest due and may demand payment of such estimate,
less any payment made under section 7-113-206, or reject the
corporation's offer under section 7-113-208 and demand payment of the
fair value of the shares and interest due, if:
(a) The dissenter believes that the amount paid under section 7-113-
206 or offered under section 7-113-208 is less than the fair
value of the shares or that the interest due was incorrectly
calculated;
(b) The corporation fails to make payment under section 7-113-206
within sixty days after the date set by the corporation by which
the corporation must receive the payment demand; or
(c) The corporation does not return the deposited certificates or
release the transfer restrictions imposed on uncertificated
shares as required by section 7-113-207(1).
(2) A dissenter waives the right to demand payment under this section
unless the dissenter causes the corporation to receive the notice
required by subsection (1) of this section within thirty days after
the corporation made or offered payment for the dissenter's shares.
(S) 7-113-301. Court action
-5-
(1) If a demand for payment under section 7-113-209 remains unresolved,
the corporation may, within sixty days after receiving the payment
demand, commence a proceeding and petition the court to determine the
fair value of the shares and accrued interest. If the corporation
does not commence the proceeding within the sixty-day period, it shall
pay to each dissenter whose demand remains unresolved the amount
demanded.
(2) The corporation shall commence the proceeding described in subsection
(1) of this section in the district court of the county in this state
where the corporation's principal office is located or, if the
corporation has no principal office in this state, in the district
court of the county in which its registered office is located. If the
corporation is a foreign corporation without a registered office, it
shall commence the proceeding in the county where the registered
office of the domestic corporation merged into, or whose shares were
acquired by, the foreign corporation was located.
(3) The corporation shall make all dissenters, whether or not residents of
this state, whose demands remain unresolved parties to the proceeding
commenced under subsection (2) of this section as in an action against
their shares, and all parties shall be served with a copy of the
petition. Service on each dissenter shall be by registered or
certified mail, to the address stated in such dissenter's payment
demand, or if no such address is stated in the payment demand, at the
address shown on the corporation's current record of shareholders for
the record shareholder holding the dissenter's shares, or as provided
by law.
(4) The jurisdiction of the court in which the proceeding is commenced
under subsection (2) of this section is plenary and exclusive. The
court may appoint one or more persons as appraisers to receive
evidence and recommend a decision on the question of fair value. The
appraisers have the powers described in the order appointing them, or
in any amendment to such order. The parties to the proceeding are
entitled to the same discovery rights as parties in other civil
proceedings.
(5) Each dissenter made a party to the proceeding commenced under
subsection (2) of this section is entitled to judgment for the amount,
if any, by which the court finds the fair value of the dissenter's
shares, plus interest, exceeds the amount paid by the corporation, or
for the fair value, plus interest, of the dissenter's shares for which
the corporation elected to withhold payment under section 7-113-208.
(S) 7-113-302. Court costs and counsel fees
(1) The court in an appraisal proceeding commenced under section 7-113-301
shall determine all costs of the proceeding, including the reasonable
compensation and expenses of appraisers appointed by the court. The
court shall assess the costs against the corporation; except that the
court may assess costs against all or some of the dissenters, in
amounts the court finds equitable, to the extent the court finds the
dissenters acted arbitrarily, vexatiously, or not in good faith in
demanding payment under section 7-113-209.
(2) The court may also assess the fees and expenses of counsel and experts
for the respective parties, in amounts the court finds equitable:
(a) Against the corporation and in favor of any dissenters if the
court finds the corporation did not substantially comply with the
requirements of part 2 of this article; or
(b) Against either the corporation or one or more dissenters, in
favor of any other party, if the court finds that the party
against whom the fees and expenses are assessed acted
arbitrarily, vexatiously, or not in good faith with respect to
the rights provided by this article.
(3) If the court finds that the services of counsel for any dissenter were
of substantial benefit to other dissenters similarly situated, and
that the fees for those services should not be assessed against the
corporation, the court may award to said counsel reasonable fees to be
paid out of the amounts awarded to the dissenters who were benefitted.
-6-
BLACK HAWK GAMING & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
Post Office Box 21
240 Main Street
Black Hawk, Colorado 80422
PRELIMINARY
COPY OF
PROXY CARD
----------
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF BLACK HAWK GAMING & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
The undersigned shareholder of Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company,
Inc., a Colorado corporation (the "Company"), hereby appoints J. Patrick McDuff
and Frank B. Day, and each of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint
his substitute, and hereby authorizes each of them to represent, and to vote as
designated on the reverse side, all the shares of common stock of the Company
held of record by the undersigned on November 30, 2001 at the Special Meeting
of Shareholders of the Company, to be held at the Hilton Garden Inn, Denver
International Airport, 16475 E. 40th Circle, Aurora, Colorado 80011, on January
4, 2002 at 11:00 a.m., Mountain Time and at all adjournments or postponements
thereof upon the following matters, as set forth in the Notice of Special
Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement, each dated December 7, 2001, copies
of which have been received by the undersigned, hereby revoking any proxy
heretofore given.
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED
HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL
BE VOTED FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER AND THE
TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY.
The board of directors of the Company recommends a vote for the Agreement
and Plan of Merger.
1. Proposal to approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, as
amended, dated as of April 25, 2001, by and among Gameco, Inc., BH
Acquisition Corp. and the Company, as heretofore and hereafter
amended, and the transactions contemplated thereby:
[_] FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN
2. The proxies are hereby authorized to vote in their discretion upon all
other business as may properly come before the Special Meeting.
Please sign exactly as your name appears on
this proxy. If the shares represented by this
proxy are held by joint tenants, both must
sign. When signing as attorney, executor,
administrator, trustee or guardian, please
give full title as such. If the shareholder
is a corporation, please sign in full
corporate name by President or other
authorized officer. If shareholder is a
partnership, please sign in partnership name
by authorized person.
DATED:_______________ 200___ __________________________________________
SIGNATURE
DATED:_______________ 200___ __________________________________________
SIGNATURE
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED
POSTAGE PREPAID ENVELOPE.