SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended October 2, 1999 --------------- or [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _______________ to _______________ Commission File Number 0-16930 EGGHEAD.COM, INC. ----------------- (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Washington 91-1296187 ---------- ---------- (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification Number) 521 S.E. Chkalov Drive 98683 ---------------------- ----- Vancouver, Washington (Zip Code) --------------------- (Address of principal executive offices) (360) 883-3447 -------------- (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES X NO ----- ----- Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock: Class Outstanding at ----- November 4, 1999 Common Stock ---------------- $.01 par value 30,808,260 shares 1 PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data EGGHEAD.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Balance Sheets (Dollars in thousands, except share amounts) April 3, October 2, ASSETS 1999 1999 ------------------ ----------------- Current assets: (unaudited) Cash and cash equivalents $ 119,467 $ 99,363 Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $920 and $767, respectively 2,316 2,424 Merchandise inventories, net 12,599 9,500 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 759 1,688 --------- --------- Total current assets 135,141 112,975 Property and equipment, net 9,196 12,017 Goodwill, net 31,631 30,773 Other assets 217 786 --------- --------- $ 176,185 $ 156,551 ========= ========= LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Liabilities: Accounts payable $ 16,276 $ 20,572 Accrued liabilities 12,398 10,239 Reserves and liabilities related to restructuring 6,517 2,423 --------- --------- Total liabilities 35,191 33,234 --------- --------- Commitments and contingencies Shareholders' equity: Preferred stock, $.01 par value: 10,000,000 authorized No shares issued and outstanding - - Common stock, $.01 par value: 50,000,000 shares authorized; 30,675,059 and 30,791,244 shares issued and outstanding, respectively 307 308 Additional paid-in capital 249,927 250,448 Retained deficit (109,240) (127,439) --------- --------- Total shareholders' equity 140,994 123,317 --------- --------- $ 176,185 $ 156.551 ========= ========= See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 2 EGGHEAD.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Operations (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) 13 Weeks Ended 26 Weeks Ended (unaudited) (unaudited) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ September October September October 26, 2, 26, 2, 1998 1999 1998 1999 ----------- --------- ----------- --------- Net sales $35,075 $ 43,350 $ 64,616 $ 83,959 Cost of sales 31,342 40,931 57,805 78,629 ----------- --------- ---------- ---------- Gross margin 3,733 2,419 6,811 5,330 Selling and marketing expense 6,941 9,366 12,731 18,886 General and administrative expense 3,687 3,745 6,754 7,937 Restructuring - (2,735) (2,735) Merger related expense - 536 708 Amortization of goodwill 429 430 848 859 Depreciation 507 1,213 872 2,316 ----------- --------- ---------- ---------- Operating loss (7,831) (10,136) (14,394) (22,641) Other income, net 632 2,455 1,646 4,442 ----------- --------- ---------- ---------- Loss before income taxes (7,199) (7,681) (12,748) (18,199) Income tax provision - - - - ----------- --------- ---------- ---------- Net loss $(7,199) $ (7,681) $(12,748) $(18,199) =========== ========= ========== ========== Basic loss per share $ (0.30) $ (0.25) $ (0.53) $ (0.59) =========== ========= ========== ========== Weighted average common shares outstanding 24,281 30,783 23,925 30,747 =========== ========= ========== ========== See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 3 EGGHEAD.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Dollars in thousands) 26 Weeks Ended (unaudited) --------------------------------------------- September 26, October 2, 1998 1999 ------------------- -------------------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss from operations $(12,748) $(18,199) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 1,720 3,176 Deferred rent and other (3) (31) (Gain) loss on disposition of assets (275) 38 Changes in assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable, net 2,949 (108) Merchandise inventories (3,748) 3,099 Prepaid expenses & other current assets 210 (929) Other assets (76) (571) Accounts payable (2,819) 4,296 Restructuring reserves (8,596) (4,094) Accrued liabilities (443) (2,159) ------------------- -------------------- Net cash used in operating activities (23,829) (15,482) ------------------- -------------------- Cash flows from investing activities: Additions to property and equipment (1,606) (5,144) Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 7,102 - ------------------- -------------------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 5,496 (5,144) ------------------- -------------------- Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from stock issuances 10,475 522 ------------------- -------------------- Net cash provided by financing activities 10,475 522 ------------------- -------------------- Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (7,858) (20,104) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 67,381 119,467 ------------------- -------------------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 59,523 $ 99,363 =================== ==================== Supplemental disclosures of cash paid (received) during the year: Interest $ 6 $ - Income taxes $ (233) $ (284) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 4 EGGHEAD.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (Amounts in thousands) Common Stock Additional -------------- Paid-in Retained Shares Amount Capital (Deficit) Total ------------------------------------------------- Balance, April 4, 1999 30,675 $307 $249,927 $(109,240) $140,994 Stock issued for cash, pursuant to employee stock purchase plan 16 - 114 - 114 Stock issued for cash, pursuant to stock option plan 96 1 366 - 367 Stock grants 4 - 41 - 41 Net loss - - - (18,199) (18,199) ------------------------------------------------- Balance, October 2, 1999 30,791 $308 $250,448 $(127,439) $123,317 ================================================= See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 5 EGGHEAD.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements All references herein to fiscal 1999 relate to the fiscal year ended April 3, 1999 and all references to fiscal 2000 refer to the fiscal year ending April 1, 2000. Note 1 Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited financial statements of Egghead.com, Inc. and subsidiaries ("Egghead.com" or the "Company") have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. While these statements reflect the adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly state the results of the interim periods, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. These adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. For further information, refer to the annual financial statements and footnotes thereto, for the 53-week period ended April 3, 1999, contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Operating results for the 26 weeks ended October 2, 1999 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending April 1, 2000. Fiscal Years The Company uses a 52/53 week fiscal year, ending on the Saturday nearest March 31 of each year. Fiscal quarters are such that the first three quarters consist of 13 weeks and the fourth quarter consists of the remaining 13/14 weeks. Fiscal 2000 will consist of 52 weeks. Fiscal 1999 had 53 weeks. Reclassifications Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on retained earnings or net income as previously reported. Note 2 Merger On July 14, 1999, Egghead.com announced that it had signed a definitive merger agreement with Onsale, Inc. ("Onsale"), a leading internet retailer. In the merger, each outstanding share of Egghead.com common stock (other than dissenting shares meeting certain conditions) will be converted into the right to receive .565 shares of Onsale common stock (the "Exchange Ratio"). The shares of Onsale common stock received by Egghead.com shareholders in the merger will represent stock ownership in the combined company after the merger. Options to purchase Egghead.com common stock will be assumed by Onsale and converted into options to purchase Onsale common stock, and the exercise price and number of shares of Onsale common stock subject to each such option will be appropriately adjusted to reflect the Exchange Ratio. The merger is intended by the parties to qualify as a tax-free reorganization and be accounted for as a "pooling of interests." If the merger is consummated, Egghead.com, Inc. will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Onsale. Upon closing of the merger, Onsale will change its name to Egghead.com, Inc. so that the combined company will be called Egghead.com, Inc. after the merger. The merger is subject to approval by shareholders of both companies, regulatory approvals and satisfaction or waiver of certain other conditions. There can be no assurance that the proposed merger will ultimately be consummated. Note 3 Loss Per Share Basic loss per share amounts are computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 128, Earnings per Share. Diluted earnings per common share are not disclosed as potentially dilutive common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive to the loss per share calculation for the 13-week and 26-week periods ended October 2, 1999 and September 26, 1998. 6 Note 4 IncomeTaxes Egghead.com determines its income tax accounts in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes result primarily from temporary differences in the recognition of certain items for income tax and financial reporting purposes. Given its ongoing losses, Egghead.com does not believe that its deferred tax assets meet the realization criteria of SFAS No. 109. Under SFAS No. 109, the realization of the deferred tax assets depends on generating future taxable income. Egghead.com management has determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets could not be currently realized. Therefore, the Company did not record a tax benefit for the three months and six months ended September 26, 1998 and October 2, 1999. Note 5 Commitments and Contingencies Significant Suppliers During the three months ended October 2, 1999, one primary distributor accounted for approximately 44% of Egghead.com's purchases. The loss of this distributor could have a material adverse effect on Egghead.com's operating results and financial condition. Credit Line for Inventory Financing The Company has available credit lines of up to $10 million for the financing of inventory. The terms of such financings vary depending on the vendor terms. The credit lines are fully secured by the inventory purchased through the agreements with the lenders. The lenders have reserved the right to discontinue the inventory financing at any time at their discretion. At October 2, 1999, there were no borrowings outstanding under these credit lines. Leases Egghead.com leases corporate offices and distribution facilities under operating leases with remaining terms ranging from one to five years. The leases generally require Egghead.com to pay taxes, insurance and certain common area maintenance costs. Aggregate rental expense, including common area maintenance charges, for all operating leases was approximately $458,000 and $333,000 for the three months ended September 26, 1998 and October 2, 1999, and $669,000 and $753,000 for the six months then ended, respectively. As of October 2, 1999, future minimum rental payments under noncancelable operating leases for headquarters and distribution facilities and equipment consisted of the following: Operating Leases Fiscal Year (in thousands) -------------- Remainder of 2000 $ 683 2001 1,095 2002 463 2003 467 Thereafter 583 ------ Total minimum payments $3,291 ====== The Company has recorded a restructuring liability for the closure of Egghead retail stores and the Sacramento, California distribution center, and a significant reduction in headquarters staff. The restructuring liability was $2.4 million at October 2, 1999, of which $2.2 million related to retail lease obligations, which are not included in the above schedule of future minimum rental payments. 7 ITEM 2 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Egghead.com and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this filing. References in this filing to "Egghead.com," "Egghead," "we," "our," and "us" refer to Egghead.com, Inc. and our wholly owned subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. The following "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" contains forward-looking statements based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management's beliefs and certain assumptions made by management. All statements, trends, analyses and other information contained in this Report on Form 10-Q relative to trends in net sales, gross margin, expense levels, liquidity and capital resources, as well as other statements in this Report on Form 10-Q, including, but not limited to, words such as "expect(s)," "anticipate(s)," "intend(s)," "plan(s)," "believe(s)," "seek(s)," "estimate(s)," and other similar expressions, constitute forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including those set forth under "Liquidity and Capital Resources" and "Additional Factors That May Affect Future Results" included in this "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." Particular attention should be paid to the cautionary statements involving our limited online operating history, our history of losses and expectation of future losses, the unpredictability of our future revenues and fluctuations in our operating results, the fluctuation of our operating results due to seasonality, the potential negative effects if the proposed merger with Onsale is not completed, the risks of systems failures and business interruptions, the risks of capacity constraints, the risks relating to systems development, management of growth, the intensely competitive nature of the electronic commerce industry, reliance on third parties and reliance on manufacturers, distributors and suppliers. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Readers, however, should carefully review the factors set forth in other reports or documents that we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Proposed Merger On July 14, 1999, Egghead.com announced that it had signed a definitive merger agreement with Onsale, a leading internet retailer. In the merger, each outstanding share of Egghead.com common stock (other than dissenting shares meeting certain conditions) will be converted into the right to receive .565 shares of Onsale common stock (the "Exchange Ratio"). The shares of Onsale common stock received by Egghead.com shareholders in the merger will represent stock ownership in the combined company after the merger. Options to purchase Egghead.com common stock will be assumed by Onsale and converted into options to purchase Onsale common stock, and the exercise price and number of shares of Onsale common stock subject to each such option will be appropriately adjusted to reflect the Exchange Ratio. The merger is intended by the parties to qualify as a tax-free reorganization and be accounted for as a "pooling of interests." If the merger is consummated, Egghead.com will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Onsale. Upon closing of the merger, Onsale will change its name to Egghead.com, Inc. so that the combined company will be called Egghead.com, Inc. after the merger. The merger is subject to approval by shareholders of both companies, regulatory approvals and satisfaction or waiver of certain other conditions. Egghead.com filed a proxy statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission that was distributed to shareholders of record as of September 20, 1999. A special shareholder meeting of Egghead.com was held on November 4, 1999, to seek approval of the merger, and was adjourned until November 19, 1999 to allow additional time for shareholders to cast their votes. Egghead.com is incorporated in Washington state, and therefore requires an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the outstanding shares to authorize the merger. As of the time of the November 4, 1999 adjournment, a majority of shareholders had voted in favor of the merger with Onsale. There can be no assurance that the proposed merger will ultimately be consummated. 8 Overview We are a leading online retailer of personal computer hardware, software, peripherals, accessories and other related products. In addition to computer- related products, we sell consumer electronics and other consumer and business goods. Egghead, Inc. began operations primarily as a traditional software reseller. The predecessor to Egghead, Inc., DJ&J Software Corporation, was incorporated in Washington in 1983. Egghead, Inc. was incorporated in Washington in 1984 and became the parent company to DJ&J Software Corporation. By 1992, Egghead, Inc. had over 200 retail store locations and had begun a direct mail division and a Corporate, Government and Educational Sales Division. On May 13, 1996, Egghead, Inc. sold the Corporate, Government and Educational Sales Division for $45.0 million. In response to continuing retail store losses, Egghead, Inc. closed 70 retail stores in February 1997 and recorded a related $24.0 million restructuring and asset impairment charge. On August 14, 1997, Egghead, Inc. acquired Surplus Software, Inc. ("Surplus Direct"). Surplus Direct owned and operated two Web sites and a direct mail division which specialized in excess, closeout and refurbished computer related merchandise. On February 28, 1998, we changed our name from Egghead, Inc. to Egghead.com, Inc., closed our remaining retail stores and shifted our primary business emphasis to electronic commerce. As part of this transition, we closed our distribution center in Sacramento, California, combined our management and operations with those of Surplus Direct and consolidated the majority of our operations in Vancouver, Washington. Operations. Net sales, cost of sales, gross margin and selling and marketing expenses consist of the results of our online shopping Web sites and inbound telephone orders. Customers can purchase products via the Internet at our online store, or can browse through our online store or review advertising flyers and then contact the inbound telephone center to complete purchases. We offer discounts to businesses, educational institutions and governmental entities that purchase large volumes for use or for resale. Anticipated Losses. We have incurred substantial losses in the operation and closure of our former retail store network and in the operation of our online store. As of October 2, 1999, we had a retained deficit of $127.4 million. We have not achieved profitability as an electronic commerce company and expect to continue to incur substantial net losses for the foreseeable future. We plan to continue to enhance our brand name through marketing and advertising programs, offer additional categories of merchandise for sale on our online store and improve and enhance our technology, infrastructure and systems. These initiatives will likely result in operating expenses that are higher than current operating expenses. We will need to generate significantly higher revenues to achieve profitability and maintain profitability if it is achieved. Although our net sales from electronic commerce have grown as compared with comparable prior year periods, such growth rates may not be sustainable. Additionally, we have experienced a historical trend of decreasing gross margin percentage, which increases the volume of net sales necessary for us to achieve profitability. Because of these and other factors, we believe that period-to- period comparisons of our historical results of operations are not good indicators of our future performance. 9 Results of Operations--Three and Six Months Ended September 26, 1998 Compared with the Three and Six Months Ended October 2, 1999 The following table shows the relationship of certain items relating to continuing operations included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations expressed as a percentage of net sales: Percentage of Net Sales --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended --------------------------------------------------------------------------- September 26, October 2, September 26, October 2, 1998 1999 1998 1999 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Net sales 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Cost of sales 89.4 94.4 89.5 93.7 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gross margin 10.6 5.6 10.5 6.3 Selling and marketing expense 19.8 21.6 19.7 22.5 General and administrative expense 10.5 8.6 10.4 9.5 Restructuring - (6.3) - (3.3) Merger related expense - 1.2 - 0.8 Depreciation and amortization expense 2.6 3.8 2.7 3.8 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating loss (22.3) (23.4) (22.3) (27.0) Other income, net 1.8 5.7 2.6 5.3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Loss before income taxes (20.5)% (17.7)% (19.7)% (21.7)% =========================================================================== 10 Net Sales. Total net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2000 were $43.4 million, a 23.6% increase from $35.1 million for the second quarter of fiscal 1999. Net sales for the six months ended October 2, 1999 were $84.0 million, a 29.9% increase from $64.6 million for the same period in fiscal 1999. The increases in net sales for the second quarter and first six-month period of fiscal 2000 were primarily attributable to an increase in the online customer base, significant investments in marketing programs designed to promote and maintain brand awareness, an increase in the number of daily and weekly online auctions, an increase in the categories and amount of merchandise offered and advertising revenue. Our customer accounts increased to approximately 1.25 million as of October 2, 1999 from approximately 727,000 as of September 26, 1998. Gross Margin. Gross margin consists of net merchandise sales and advertising revenue minus cost of sales. Cost of sales includes initial margin (net sales minus cost of products sold), obsolete inventory charges and net shipping (shipping reimbursements less shipping costs). Gross margin from net sales was $2.4 million, or 5.6% of sales, for the second quarter of fiscal 2000, a reduction from gross margin of 10.6% of sales for the comparable prior year period. Gross margin from net sales was $5.3 million, or 6.3% of sales, for the six months ended October 2, 1999, compared with gross margin of 10.5% of sales for the same period in fiscal 1999. Gross margin in the second quarter and first six-month period of fiscal 2000 reflects continued downward pressure due to certain competitors' competitive pricing strategies, which was partially offset by freight and handling revenue. We have responded to these competitive pressures by reducing the selling prices on certain products. This reduction in selling prices had a material adverse impact on our second quarter fiscal 2000 gross margins when compared to our historical online gross margins. Management has initiated, and will continue to initiate, actions in an attempt to offset the reduction in gross margins; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain gross margins or that this reduction in selling prices will not negatively affect our gross margins in the third quarter of fiscal 2000. Selling and Marketing Expense. Selling and marketing expense consists primarily of operating expenses related to marketing, inbound telephone support, online store support and distribution. Such operating expenses include promotional agreements for online and offline advertising, credit card processing costs, payroll and benefits, telecommunications, bad debts and supplies. The selling and marketing expenses have increased $2.4 million and $6.2 million for the second quarter and first six-month period of fiscal 2000, respectively, from the comparable periods in fiscal year 1999. The increases in selling and marketing expenses were primarily attributable to our efforts to improve customer service performance, enhance our brand name recognition, and expand our online shopping capabilities. However, we cannot assure you that the increases in such expenses will actually result in the intended increases and expansions. General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense consists primarily of payroll and related expenses of headquarters support functions, such as executive, merchandising, purchasing, engineering, accounting, recruiting and facilities expenses and other general corporate expenses. The general and administrative expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2000 decreased 10.6% to $3.7 million, or 8.6% of sales, as compared with $4.2 million, or 10.3% of sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2000. The general and administrative expenses have remained unchanged at $3.7 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2000 from the comparable period in fiscal year 1999, while these expenses have increased $1.2 million for the comparable six- month periods. This increase was primarily due to increased payroll and other overhead costs to support our sales growth. Restructuring. Restructuring income of $2.7 million reflects a change in management's estimate of costs remaining to complete the closure of our retail network, which is substantially complete. The revision in estimates during the quarter ended October 2, 1999 primarily related to the resolution of certain lease obligations for former retail facilities. Merger related expense. Merger related expense of $0.5 million and $0.7 million for the second quarter and first six-month period of fiscal 2000 represents costs incurred related to the proposed merger with Onsale, for which recognition has not been deferred, primarily related to employee retention. Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense consists primarily of depreciation of our capital equipment and amortization of goodwill recorded in connection with the acquisition of Surplus Direct in August 1997. Depreciation expense of $1.2 million and $2.3 million for the second quarter and first six-month period of fiscal 2000, respectively, increased compared with $0.5 million and $0.9 million for the comparable periods in fiscal year 1999. Net property and equipment increased $2.8 million to $12.0 million at 11 October 2, 1999 from $9.2 million at April 3, 1999. These increases are primarily due to the purchasing of hardware and software necessary for expanding our Web site capabilities and serving our increasing customer base, and leasehold improvements to our headquarters in Vancouver, Washington and our distribution facility. Amortization expense remained consistent for each of the second quarters of fiscal 2000 and fiscal 1999 at $0.4 million. Other Income, Net. Other income, net for the second quarter and first six- month period of fiscal 2000 was $2.4 million and $4.4 million, respectively, compared with $0.6 million and $1.6 million for the same periods of fiscal 1999. These increases were primarily attributable to an increase in interest income, resulting from higher cash balances due to the issuance of an additional 5.75 million shares of common stock through a public offering in March 1999, which resulted in net proceeds of $72.9 million. In addition, other income, net for the quarter ended October 2, 1999 includes approximately $0.5 million of non- recurring income primarily related to the final settlement of certain pre- acquisition contingencies from the purchase of Surplus Direct in August 1997. Income Taxes. Due to our ongoing net operating losses, we did not record a provision for income taxes for the second quarter of fiscal 2000 or fiscal 1999. Given our recent losses, we have determined that our deferred tax assets do not meet the realization criteria of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Under SFAS No. 109, the realization of the deferred tax assets depends on generating future taxable income. We have determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets could not currently be realized. Until we have determined that all of the existing net operating losses are realizable, we will not record a tax charge or benefit for future operating results. Our net operating losses can be recovered for tax purposes over a 15-year period from origin if profitability is achieved. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Liquidity and Capital Resources In recent fiscal years, we have funded our operations through cash provided by operations, public issuance of common stock, asset sales, exercises of stock options and the proceeds relating to the sale of the Corporate, Government and Educational Sales Division. Cash and cash equivalents decreased to $99.4 million as of October 2, 1999 from $119.5 million at April 3, 1999. The decrease in the cash balance was primarily due to net cash used in operating activities of $15.5 million and net cash used in investing activities of $5.1 million. Cash used in operating activities of $15.5 million for the first six-month period of fiscal 2000 was primarily due to the net loss of $18.2 million, a decrease in accrued liabilities of $2.2 million, and a $4.1 million decrease in the restructure reserve liability, partially offset by depreciation and amortization of $3.2 million, a $3.1 million decrease in inventory, and a $4.3 increase in accounts payable. Net cash used in investing activities of $5.1 million for the first six-month period of fiscal 2000 consisted of capital expenditures, primarily related to the upgrading of the Web site software platforms and related hardware, and leasehold improvements to the new distribution facility. Cash provided by financing activities of $0.5 million for the first six-month period of fiscal 2000 consisted of proceeds from stock issuances under our stock option and stock purchase plans. As of October 2, 1999, our principal source of liquidity was $99.4 million of cash. We have credit lines totaling $10.0 million for the financing of inventory. The credit lines are fully secured by the inventory purchased. As of October 2, 1999, there were no borrowings outstanding under these lines of credit. As of October 2, 1999, our principal commitments consisted of obligations in connection with operating leases and commitments for advertising and promotional arrangements. Although we have no material commitments for capital expenditures, we anticipate future purchases related to enhancements of our Web site to improve functionality and navigation, incorporating features that are intended to improve the customer shopping experience, and scalability and performance of our Web site. We estimate capital expenditures through the end of fiscal 2000 to be approximately $5.0 million. See Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 12 We believe that our current cash and cash equivalent balances, without considering the effect of the consummation of the proposed merger with Onsale, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for the next twelve months. Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors discussed under the "Additional Factors That May Affect Future Results" section of this Report on Form 10-Q. In addition, we may, from time to time, consider the acquisition of or investment in complementary businesses, products, services and technologies, which might increase our liquidity requirements or cause us to issue additional equity or debt securities. Although we believe that our current cash and cash equivalent balances will be sufficient for the next twelve months (without considering the effects of the consummation of the proposed merger with Onsale), we cannot assure you that we will not require additional financing within this time frame or that such additional funding, if needed, will be available on terms acceptable to us or at all. We do not currently use derivative financial instruments. Impact of the Year 2000 Issue The Year 2000 issue exists because many computer systems and applications use two-digit fields to designate a year. Date-sensitive computer systems and programs may fail to recognize or correctly process the year 2000 as the century date change approaches or occurs. This inability to properly recognize or address the year 2000 may cause systems errors or failures that could seriously disrupt or prevent normal business operations. As a company engaged in electronic commerce, we rely on computer programs and systems in connection with our internal and external communication networks and systems (including transmissions of information over the Internet), the operation of our Web site, customer use of our Web site, order processing and fulfillment, accounting and financial systems, and other business functions. Because our internal systems and software are relatively new, and the majority are covered by maintenance agreements with third-party suppliers, we do not expect that the Year 2000 costs relating to our own internal systems will be significant. Our plan for addressing Year 2000 issues has three phases: (1) identification and evaluation; (2) development of plans for addressing the issues and prioritization of those plans; and (3) implementation of plans and verification of effectiveness. As of October 2, 1999, we had completed these three phases of addressing our Year 2000 issues. Due to our electronic commerce focus, our reliance on significant non- information technology systems is primarily limited to telecommunications equipment, voicemail systems and property security systems. We have replaced our telecommunications equipment and voicemail systems with systems that the suppliers state are Year 2000 compliant. We have evaluated our property security systems and determined that they are Year 2000 compliant. Any failure of third-party networks, systems or services could have a material adverse impact on our business. Our business depends on the satisfactory performance and reliability of the external communication and computer networks, systems and services integral to the Internet. These networks, systems and services are maintained or provided by third parties and affect the ability of customers to access and purchase products at our Web site. We also rely on other systems and services that third parties provide to our customers. As a result, the success of our plan to address the Year 2000 issues depends in part on parallel efforts being undertaken by such other third parties. We have identified and initiated communications with those third parties whose networks, systems or services are critical to our business to determine the status of these entities' Year 2000 compliance. We cannot assure you that all such parties will provide accurate and complete information, or that all their networks, systems or services will achieve full Year 2000 compliance in a timely fashion. In an attempt to mitigate the risk of noncompliance by certain critical service providers, we have begun to diversify our use of certain services among several providers. However, we cannot assure you that this diversification will mitigate the risk of noncompliance. Costs related to our efforts to address Year 2000 issues have been expensed as incurred and have not been material to date. We have funded Year 2000-related costs through funds provided by operations. Future costs of these efforts are partially based on numerous assumptions about future events. We cannot assure you that these estimates will be correct. Actual costs could differ materially from these estimates. Although we have taken steps to achieve Year 2000 compliance of our internal systems and to evaluate the compliance of third-party service providers on which our business depends, the most reasonably likely worst-case scenario resulting from possible Year 2000 noncompliance is that noncompliance by third parties would disrupt, 13 reduce or eliminate for a period of time the ability of our customers to access and purchase products at our Web site. If such occurrences are frequent or long in duration, they could materially adversely affect our business. The Year 2000 compliance of third-party global, national and local communications networks and the compliance of individual Internet service providers is not within our control. Accordingly, a contingency plan for this worst-case scenario does not exist and we do not believe we will be able to develop one. We have, however, begun to diversify our uses of certain services among several providers to attempt to mitigate this risk. We cannot assure you, however, that our efforts will mitigate the risk of non-compliance, and any failure of third-party networks, systems or services could materially adversely affect our business. We believe we are taking the necessary steps regarding Year 2000 compliance with respect to matters within our control to seek to minimize the impact of Year 2000 issues on our business. However, we cannot assure you that the efforts taken to date will result in the intended level of Year 2000 compliance, that we will not incur significant additional expenses in dealing with Year 2000 issues, that the third parties upon which our business depends will achieve Year 2000 compliance, or that the Year 2000 problem will not materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We rely on the quality of the products that manufacturers, distributors and suppliers provide to us for sale to our customers. To the extent that the products we sell are not Year 2000 compliant, we may be subject to claims by customers that could materially adversely affect our business or damage our reputation. Recent Accounting Pronouncements During June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The new standard requires companies to record derivatives on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities, measured at fair value. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the values of those derivatives would be accounted for depending on the use of the derivative and whether it qualifies for hedge accounting. Because we do not use derivatives, the new standard is expected to have no material impact on our financial position or results of operations. SFAS No. 133 will be effective for fiscal 2001. 14 Additional Factors That May Affect Future Results In addition to other information contained in this report, the following factors could affect our actual results and could cause such results to differ materially from those achieved in the past or expressed in our forward-looking statements. We have a limited online operating history which provides little information with which to evaluate our electronic commerce business In February 1998, we shifted our business emphasis to the Internet and closed our remaining retail stores. We therefore have had only a limited operating history as an electronic commerce company. As a result, there is little information on which to evaluate our business and prospects as an electronic commerce company. An investor in our common stock must consider the risks and difficulties that early-stage companies frequently encounter in the new and rapidly evolving market of electronic commerce. Such risks for us include: . our evolving and unpredictable business model; . our competitors that have more established electronic commerce operations; . our need and ability to manage growth; and . the rapid evolution of technology in electronic commerce. We have a history of losses and expect future losses We have incurred substantial losses in the operation and closing of our former retail store network and in the operation of our electronic commerce business. As of October 2, 1999, we had a retained deficit of $127.4 million. We have not achieved profitability as an electronic commerce company, and we expect to continue to incur substantial net losses for the foreseeable future. We plan to continue to enhance our brand name through competitive pricing, marketing and advertising programs, offer additional categories of merchandise for sale at our online store and improve and enhance our technology, infrastructure and systems. These initiatives will likely result in operating expenses that are higher than current operating expenses. We will need to generate significant revenues to achieve profitability and to maintain profitability if it is achieved. Although our revenues from electronic commerce have grown in recent quarters, such growth rates may not be sustainable and we may not become profitable in the future. Our future revenues are unpredictable and our operating results may fluctuate significantly Because we have a limited operating history in electronic commerce and because electronic commerce is a new, emerging market, we cannot accurately forecast our revenues. Although our revenues from electronic commerce have grown in recent quarters, you should not use these past results to predict our future results. We base our current and future expenditures on our plans and estimates of future revenues. Our expenses are, to a large degree, fixed. We may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner if we experience an unexpected shortfall in our revenues. We expect that our future quarterly operating results will fluctuate significantly because of many factors, several of which we do not control. Such factors include: . our ability to satisfy customers, retain existing customers and attract new customers at a steady rate; . our ability to acquire, price and market merchandise inventory such that we maintain gross margins in our existing business and in future product lines and markets; . pricing competition, including, but not limited to, pricing which results in no gross margin on certain products; . the level of traffic at our Web site; . our ability to fulfill customer orders; . the development, announcement or introduction of new sites, services or products by us or by our competitors; . the amount the Internet is used generally and, more specifically, for the purchase of consumer products such as those that we offer; . our ability to upgrade and develop our systems and infrastructure and attract new employees; 15 . the occurrence of technical or communications failures, system downtime and Internet disruptions; . the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures that we incur to expand our business; . governmental regulation and taxation policies; . disruptions in service by common carriers such as United Parcel Service; . unanticipated increases in shipping and transaction-processing costs; and . general economic conditions and economic conditions specific to the Internet, electronic commerce and the computer industry. Our revenues depend on the number of times customers make purchases at our online store and the level of sales and bidding activity at the Egghead Auctions section of our online store. The amount of sales and bidding activity at our online store depends in part on the number of customers, the competitive pricing of our products and the availability of merchandise from our suppliers. We cannot forecast the number of future customers, the future pricing strategies of our competitors or the future availability of merchandise with any degree of certainty. It is clear, however, that if the number of customers does not increase, if our gross margins decrease or if the amount of merchandise available to us decreases substantially, our business will suffer. Because of these and other factors, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our historical results of operations are not a good indicator of our future performance. Our operating results may fluctuate depending on the season We expect to experience fluctuations in our operating results because of seasonal fluctuations in traditional retail patterns. Retail sales in the traditional retail industry tend to be significantly higher in the fourth calendar quarter of each year than in the preceding three quarters. As a result of such factors, our operating results in one or more future quarters may fluctuate and, therefore, period-to-period comparisons of our historical results of operations may not be good indicators of our future performance. Failure to complete the merger transaction with Onsale, Inc. could harm our stock price and future business and operations We face a number of specific risks if the proposed merger with Onsale is not completed, including the following: . we may be required to pay Onsale a termination fee equal to four percent of our equity value (as described in the merger agreement filed as an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 23, 1999); . we may be required to make an unsecured loan to Onsale for up to $16.0 million and reimburse Onsale for expenses incurred in connection with the proposed merger, including investment banking, legal and accounting expenses; . an option that has been granted to Onsale to purchase 19.9% of our common stock may become exercisable; . the price of our common stock may decline to the extent that the current market price reflects a market assumption that the merger will be completed; and . costs related to the merger, such as legal and accounting and some financial advisor fees, must be paid even if the merger is not completed. In addition, current and prospective employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles, which may impair our ability to attract and retain key management, marketing, technical and administrative personnel. This may impair our ability to conduct normal business operations if the merger is not completed. Furthermore, if the stock option granted to Onsale is exercised, we will be unable to account for future business combinations as a "pooling of interests." The special shareholders meeting that was held on November 4, 1999 to seek approval of the merger was adjourned until November 19, 1999, because there was an insufficient number of shareholder votes on November 4, 16 1999 to approve the merger. We cannot assure you that a further adjournment of the meeting will not occur or that the proposed merger will ultimately be consummated. We face risks relating to the Year 2000 issue The Year 2000 issue exists because many computer systems and applications use two-digit fields to designate a year. Date-sensitive computer systems and programs may fail to recognize or correctly process the year 2000 as the century date change approaches or occurs. This inability to properly recognize or address the year 2000 may cause systems errors or failures that could seriously disrupt or prevent normal business operations. As a company engaged in electronic commerce, we rely on computer programs and systems in connection with our internal and external communication networks and systems (including transmissions of information over the Internet), the operation of our Web site, customer use of our Web site, order processing and fulfillment, accounting and financial systems, and other business functions. We have completed our Year 2000 readiness program, but cannot assure you that all of the systems on which we rely are Year 2000 compliant, and we cannot assure you that our systems will be made Year 2000 compliant in a timely manner or that the third parties upon which our business depends will achieve Year 2000 compliance. We may incur significant additional expenses for Year 2000 issues. Any failure of third-party networks, systems or services upon which our business depends could have a material adverse impact on our business. Our business depends on the satisfactory performance and reliability of the external communication and computer networks, systems and services integral to the Internet. These networks, systems and services are maintained or provided by third parties and affect the ability of our customers to access and purchase products at our Web site. We also rely on other systems and services that third parties provide to our customers. As a result, the success of our plan to address Year 2000 issues depends in part on parallel efforts being undertaken by other third parties. We have identified and initiated communications with third parties whose networks, systems or services are critical to our business to determine the status of their Year 2000 compliance. We cannot assure you that all such parties will provide accurate and complete information, or that all their networks, systems or services will achieve full Year 2000 compliance in a timely fashion. The most reasonably likely worst-case scenario for us resulting from Year 2000 issues is that third-party noncompliance would disrupt, reduce or eliminate for a period of time the ability of our customers to connect with and purchase products at our Web site. If such occurrences are frequent or long in duration, they could materially adversely affect our business. The compliance of third-party global, national and local communications networks and the compliance of individual Internet service providers is not within our control. Accordingly, a contingency plan for this worst-case scenario does not exist, and we do not believe we will be able to develop one. We rely on the quality of the products that manufacturers, distributors and suppliers provide to us for sale to our customers. To the extent that the products we sell are not Year 2000 compliant, we may be subject to claims by customers that could materially adversely affect our business or damage our reputation. We may have future capital needs We currently anticipate that our available funds (without considering the effects of the consummation of the proposed merger with Onsale), will be sufficient to meet our anticipated needs for working capital (including, without limitation, for marketing and advertising expenses), capital expenditures and business expansion for at least the next twelve months. Thereafter, we may need to raise additional funds. However, we may need to raise additional funds sooner in order to fund more rapid expansion, to develop new or enhanced services or products, to respond to competitive pressures or to acquire complementary businesses, products, services or technologies. We cannot assure you that additional financing will be available, or available on terms favorable to us. If such financing is not available, we may not be able to fund our expansion, take advantage of unanticipated acquisition opportunities, develop or enhance services, products or technologies, or respond to competitive pressures. We may suffer systems failures and business interruptions Our success, especially our ability to receive and fulfill customer orders, largely depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our computer and telephone communications systems. Almost all of our computer and 17 communications systems are located at a single leased facility in Vancouver, Washington. We have experienced temporary power failures and telecommunications failures from time to time at this facility. Our systems are vulnerable to damage from fire, floods, power loss, telecommunications failures, break-ins, earthquakes and other events. Although we have implemented network security measures, our servers are vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins, attempts by third parties deliberately to exceed the capacity of our systems and similar disruptions. Any of these events could lead to interruptions or delays in service, loss of data or the inability to accept and confirm customer orders. Generally, we do not have redundant systems or a formal disaster recovery plan, and our coverage limits on our property and business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for losses that may occur. We face risks of capacity constraints Our revenues depend to a significant degree on the number of customers who use our online store to buy merchandise. We depend on the satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of our Web site, transaction- processing systems, network infrastructure, customer support center and delivery and shipping systems. These factors are critical to our reputation, our ability to attract and retain customers and to maintain adequate customer service levels, and our operating results. If the amount of traffic, the number of orders or the amount of auction bidding at our Web site increases substantially, we may experience capacity constraints and may need to further expand and upgrade our technology, transaction-processing systems and network infrastructure. We may be unable to sufficiently predict the rate or timing of increases in the use of our online store to enable us to quickly upgrade our systems to handle such increases. We face risks relating to systems development We are heavily dependent on our technological systems, some of which were not designed for electronic commerce but have been modified by us for that use. Although we upgrade and expand these systems on an ongoing basis, in the near future we will need to significantly upgrade and expand or replace our transaction-processing systems to handle increased traffic at our online store. We will also need to upgrade and expand our systems for the Egghead Auctions format of our online store, particularly to improve its scalability. We also plan to upgrade and expand our systems to add customer feedback features to provide enhanced customer service, more complete customer data and better management reporting information. These efforts will require us to integrate newly developed and/or purchased technologies into our existing systems and to hire more engineering and information technology personnel in the near future. If we are unable in a timely manner to hire required personnel and to add new software and hardware or to develop and upgrade our existing systems to handle increased traffic and increased sales and auction bidding at our online store, we could experience unanticipated system disruptions, slower response times, degraded customer service and a decrease in our ability to fulfill customer orders. We may be unable to manage our growth Our ability to successfully implement our business plan in a rapidly evolving market requires an effective planning and growth-management process. If we are unable to manage our growth, we may not be able to implement our business plan, and our business may suffer as a result. We expect that we will have to expand our business to address potential growth in the number of customers, to expand our product and service offerings and to pursue other market opportunities. We expect that we will need to expand existing operations, particularly those relating to information technology and merchandising. We expect that we will also need to continue to improve our operational, financial and inventory systems, procedures and controls, and will need to expand, train and manage our workforce, particularly our information technology staff. Furthermore, we expect that we will need to continue to manage multiple relationships with various suppliers, freight companies, warehouse operators, Web sites, Internet service providers, and other third parties as the electronic commerce business evolves. The electronic commerce market is intensely competitive The electronic commerce industry is new, rapidly evolving and intensely competitive. We may not be successful in competing against our current and future competitors. It is not difficult to enter the electronic commerce market, and current and new competitors can launch new electronic commerce Web sites at relatively low 18 cost. We expect competition in electronic commerce to increase as retailers, suppliers, manufacturers and direct marketers who have not traditionally sold computer products and consumer goods directly to consumers through the Internet enter this market segment. Furthermore, competition may increase to the extent that mergers and acquisitions result in electronic commerce companies with greater market share and revenues. Increased competition or failure by us to compete successfully is likely to result in price reductions, fewer customer orders, reduced gross margins, increased marketing costs, loss of market share, or any combination of these problems. We currently compete with a variety of companies that sell personal computer products and other consumer goods through a variety of sales channels to customers. These competitors include: . Companies with electronic commerce sites such as Amazon.com, Inc., Beyond.com Corporation, Buy.com Inc. and Cyberian Outpost, Inc., Dell Computer Corporation, and electronic software distributors such as Digital River, Inc.; . Companies offering Internet auctions, such as Onsale, Inc., uBid, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., Internet Shopping Network, Inc. (the FirstAuction site), Micro Warehouse, Inc., eBay Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.; . Companies whose primary business is not online retailing but who derive significant revenue from electronic commerce, including America Online, Inc., Yahoo! Inc. and QVC, Inc.; . Traditional retailers of personal computer products such as CompUSA, Inc., Best Buy and Circuit City; . Manufacturers such as Dell Computer Corporation and Gateway, Inc. that sell directly to the consumer, including over the Internet; . Mass merchandisers such as Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation and Best Buy Co., Inc. that primarily sell through traditional retail channels but also sell over the Internet; and . Office products retailers such as Office Depot Inc. and Staples, Inc. that primarily sell through traditional retail channels but also sell over the Internet. . Catalog-based merchants with a significant electronic commerce offering, such as CDW Computers Centers, Inc., Micro Warehouse, Inc., Insight Enterprises, Inc., Multiple Zones International, Inc. and Creative Computers, Inc. We believe that the principal competitive factors affecting our market are brand name recognition, competitive pricing, quality of customer service, quality of product information, breadth of merchandise offerings, cost of customer acquisition and ease of use of electronic commerce sites. Although we believe we compete adequately with respect to such factors, we cannot assure you that we can maintain our competitive position against current and potential competitors, especially those with greater financial, marketing, customer support, technical and other resources. Some competitors have begun selling certain products at or near the purchase price paid by them to acquire the products. To improve our competitive position, we are focused on increasing our level of customer service and maintaining competitive pricing. Current and potential competitors have established or may establish cooperative relationships among themselves or directly with suppliers to obtain exclusive or semi-exclusive sources of merchandise. New competitors or alliances among competitors and suppliers may emerge and rapidly acquire market share. For example, Dell Computer Corporation and Amazon.com, Inc. have agreed to provide links from their Web sites to new Web pages that advertise their respective products. Also, manufacturers might elect to sell or liquidate their products directly over the Internet. Many of our current and potential competitors have significantly greater financial, marketing, customer support, technical and other resources than we do. As a result, they may be able to secure merchandise from suppliers on more favorable terms than we can, and they may be able to respond more quickly to changes in customer preference or to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their merchandise than we can. We rely heavily on certain third parties, including Internet service providers and telecommunications companies Our operations depend on a variety of third parties for Internet access, telecommunications, operating software, order fulfillment, merchandise delivery and credit card transaction processing. We have limited control over these third parties, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain satisfactory relationships with any of them 19 on acceptable commercial terms. Nor can we assure you that the quality of products and services that they provide will remain at the levels needed to enable us to conduct our business effectively. We rely on Internet service providers to connect our Web site to the Internet. From time to time, we have experienced temporary interruptions in our Web site connection and also our telecommunications access. Frequent or prolonged interruptions of these Web site connection services could result in significant losses of revenues. Our Web site software and internally developed auction software depend on operating systems, data base and server software that were produced by and licensed from third parties. From time to time, we have discovered errors and defects in such software and, in part, rely on these third parties to correct these errors and defects promptly. Third-party distribution centers fulfill a significant portion of the sales for which we are responsible. Accordingly, any service interruptions experienced by these distribution centers as a result of labor problems or otherwise could disrupt or prevent the fulfillment of some of our customers' orders. In addition, we use United Parcel Service and Airborne Express as the primary delivery services for our products. Our business would suffer if labor problems or other causes prevented these or any other major carriers from delivering our products for significant time periods. Furthermore, First USA Bank, through its relationship with First USA Paymentech, Inc. (Paymentech) is our sole processor of credit card transactions. If computer systems failures or other problems were to prevent Paymentech from processing our credit card transactions, we would experience delays and business disruptions. Any such delays or disruptions in customer service may damage our reputation or result in loss of customers. We rely heavily on certain manufacturers, distributors and suppliers We depend entirely on certain manufacturers, distributors and suppliers to supply us with merchandise for sale at our online store. We cannot assure you that we will be able to develop and maintain satisfactory relationships with such parties on acceptable commercial terms, or that we will be able to obtain sufficient quality and quantities of merchandise at competitive prices. Also, the quality of service provided by such parties may fall below the standard needed to enable us to conduct our business effectively. We acquire products for sale both directly from manufacturers and indirectly through distributors and suppliers. Purchases from Ingram Micro Inc., a distributor of computers and related products, accounted for approximately 44% of our aggregate merchandise purchases for the three months ended October 2, 1999. We have no long-term contracts or arrangements with manufacturers, distributors or suppliers that guarantee availability of merchandise for our online store. We cannot assure you that current manufacturers, distributors and suppliers will continue to sell merchandise to us or otherwise provide merchandise for sale by us or that we will be able to establish new manufacturer, distributor or supplier relationships that ensure merchandise will be available for sale by us. We also rely on many of our distributors and suppliers to ship merchandise to customers. We have limited control over the shipping procedures of these distributors and suppliers, and such shipments have often been subject to delays. Most merchandise sold by us carries a warranty from the manufacturer or the supplier, and we are not obligated to accept merchandise returns. Nevertheless, we in fact have accepted returns from customers for which we did not receive reimbursements from our suppliers or manufacturers, and the levels of returned merchandise in the future may exceed our expectations. We may also find that we have to accept more returns in the future to maintain customer satisfaction. We face the risks of expanding into new services and business areas To increase our revenues, we will need to expand, over time, our operations by promoting new or complementary products or by expanding the breadth and depth of our product or service offerings. If we expand our operations in this manner, we will require significant additional development resources and such expansion may strain our management, financial and operational resources. We may not significantly benefit in such expansion from the Egghead.com brand name or from the early entry advantage that we have experienced in the online computer products market. Gross margins attributable to new business areas may be lower than those associated with our existing business activities. We cannot assure you that our expansions into new product categories, online sales formats or products or service offerings will be timely or will generate enough revenue to offset their costs. Also, any new product category or product or service offering that we launch that is not favorably received by consumers could damage our reputation or the Egghead.com brand. 20 We depend on our key personnel, and we will need to attract and retain additional personnel Our performance is substantially dependent on the continued services and on the performance of our executive officers and other key employees, particularly George P. Orban, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. We do not maintain "key person" life insurance policies. Although some of our executive officers and key employees have entered into employment agreements, none of these agreements prevents any of them from leaving Egghead.com. As a result of our proposed merger with Onsale, some of our executive officers or key employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles and may elect to leave the Company. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees could materially adversely affect our business. Additionally, we believe we will need to expand significantly our information technology staff in the near future and will need to identify, attract, hire, train and retain other highly- skilled personnel to be successful. Competition for personnel in the electronic commerce industry is intense. We cannot assure you that we will be able to expand our information technology staff or successfully identify, attract, hire and retain other highly-skilled personnel in a timely and effective manner. Electronic commerce poses security risks to us A significant barrier to electronic commerce and communications is the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks. We rely upon encryption and authentication technology licensed from third parties to provide secure transmission of confidential information. We cannot assure you that our security measures will prevent security breaches, and such breaches could expose us to operating losses, litigation and possible liability. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other events or developments may result in a compromise or breach of the algorithms that we use to protect customer transaction data. A party who is able to circumvent our security measures could steal proprietary information or interrupt our operations. We may need to spend a great deal of money and use other resources to protect against the threat of such security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by such breaches. Concerns over the security of online transactions and the privacy of users may also inhibit the growth of the Internet generally, and the Web in particular, especially as a means of conducting commercial transactions. We face risks relating to our inventory We directly purchase some of the merchandise that we sell at our online Egghead Superstores and most of our off-price merchandise, including excess, close-out, refurbished and reconditioned goods, that we sell at our online Egghead SurplusDirect liquidation center and through Egghead Auctions. We assume the inventory risks, inventory obsolescence risks and price erosion risks for products that we purchase directly. These risks are especially significant because much of the merchandise we sell at our online store (for example, computer hardware, software and consumer electronics) is characterized by rapid technological change, obsolescence and price erosion. In the recent past we have recorded charges for obsolete inventory and have had to sell certain merchandise at a discount or loss. It is impossible to determine with certainty whether an item will sell for more than the price we pay for it. Because we rely heavily on purchased inventory, our success will depend on our ability to liquidate our inventory rapidly, the ability of our buying staff to purchase inventory at attractive prices relative to its resale value, and our ability to manage customer returns and the shrinkage resulting from theft, loss and misrecording of inventory. If we are unsuccessful in any of these areas, we may be forced to sell our inventory at a discount or loss. We are dependent on intellectual property Our performance and ability to compete are dependent to a significant degree on our proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of trademark, copyright and trade secret laws to establish and protect our proprietary rights. Although we have applied for trademark protection for the Egghead.com name, this name is not currently a registered trademark in the United States. We cannot assure you that we will be able to secure significant protection for this trademark and our other trademarks or service marks. It is possible that our competitors or others will adopt product or service names similar to "Egghead.com" or other service marks or trademarks of ours, thereby impeding our ability to build brand identity and possibly confusing customers. 21 Our proprietary software is protected by copyright laws. The source code for our proprietary software also is protected under applicable trade secret laws. We cannot assure you that the steps we take to protect our software will prevent misappropriation of our technology or that the agreements we enter into for that purpose will be enforceable. It might be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use our software or other proprietary information without authorization, or to develop similar software independently. Policing unauthorized use of our technology is difficult, particularly because the global nature of the Internet makes it difficult to control the ultimate destination or security of software or other data transmitted. The laws of other countries may not adequately protect our intellectual property. We may in the future receive notices from third parties claiming infringement by our software or other intellectual property used in our business. While we are not currently subject to any such claim, any future claim, with or without merit, could result in significant litigation costs and distraction of management, and could require us to enter into costly and burdensome royalty and licensing agreements. Such royalty and licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to us, or may not be available at all. In the future, we may also need to file lawsuits to defend the validity of our intellectual property rights and trade secrets, or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Such litigation, whether successful or unsuccessful, could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources. We also rely on a variety of technologies that we license from third parties such as the database and Internet commerce server applications that we license from Oracle Corporation. We cannot assure you that these third-party technology licenses will continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms. If we lose any such licenses, or if we are unable to maintain or obtain upgrades to any of these licenses, it could delay completion of our proprietary software enhancements until equivalent technology is identified, licensed or developed, and integrated. We are vulnerable to the rapid evolution of electronic commerce and related technology The Internet and the electronic commerce industry are characterized by rapid technological change, changes in user and customer requirements, frequent new service or product introductions embodying new technologies, and the emergence of new industry standards and practices. Changes in the Internet, electronic commerce and the related technology could render our Web site and technology obsolete. To remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the customer service features, responsiveness and functionality of our Web site. Our success in achieving these goals depends on our ability to develop or license new technologies and respond promptly and cost-effectively to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices. The development and licensing of technologies relating to the Internet and electronic commerce involves significant technical, financial and business risks. We may not be successful in developing, licensing or integrating new technologies or promptly adapting our Web site, proprietary technology and transaction-processing systems to customer needs or emerging industry standards. We are dependent on the continued development of the Internet infrastructure We depend almost entirely on the Internet for revenue and the increased use of the Internet for commerce is essential for our business to grow. Accordingly, our success depends in large part on the continued development of the infrastructure for providing Internet access and services. The Internet could lose its viability or its usage could decline due to many factors, including: . delays in the development of the Internet infrastructure; . power outages; . disruptions due to the inability of computer systems to recognize the year 2000; . the adoption of new standards or protocols for the Internet; or . changes or increases in governmental regulation. We cannot be certain that the infrastructure or complementary services necessary to maintain the Internet as a useful and easy means of buying goods will be developed or that, if they are developed, the Internet will remain a viable marketing and sales channel for the types of products and services that we offer at our online store. 22 We face risks associated with maintaining the value of our domain names We currently hold various Web domain names relating to our brand, including the Egghead.com, Surplusdirect.com and Surplusauction.com domain names. We cannot assure you that we will be able to acquire or maintain relevant domain names in all jurisdictions in which we conduct business. The acquisition and maintenance of domain names generally is regulated by governmental agencies and their designees. The regulation of domain names in the United States and in foreign countries is subject to change. Governing bodies may establish additional top-level domains, appoint additional domain name registrars or modify the requirements for holding domain names. The relationship between regulations governing domain names and laws protecting trademarks and similar proprietary rights is unclear. Therefore, we may be unable to prevent third parties from acquiring domain names that are similar to, infringe on or otherwise decrease the value of our brand and our trademarks and other proprietary rights. We are subject to government regulation and legal uncertainties We are currently subject to regulations applicable to businesses generally, as well as laws or regulations directly applicable to communications or commerce over the Internet. The adoption or modification of laws or regulations relating to the Internet could adversely affect our business. The law of the Internet remains largely unsettled, even in areas where there has been some legislative action. Several states have laws that regulate auctions and auction companies within their jurisdictions. Some states may interpret their statutes to apply to our auction transactions with consumers in such states. The burdens of complying with auctioneering laws could materially increase our cost of doing business. Similarly, states may construe their existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, taxation, intellectual property, libel and personal privacy to apply to Internet companies servicing consumers within their jurisdictions. Resolution of whether or how these laws will be applied is uncertain and may take years to resolve. In addition, due to the increasing popularity and use of the Internet, it is possible that a number of laws and regulations may be adopted with respect to the Internet or other online services covering issues such as user privacy, security, pricing, content, copyrights, distribution, taxation and characteristics and quality of products and services. Furthermore, the growth and development of electronic commerce may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws that may impose additional burdens on electronic commerce companies. We are vulnerable to additional tax obligations We currently collect sales tax only on sales of products delivered to residents in the state of Washington. However, other states or foreign countries may seek to impose sales tax collection obligations on us and other electronic commerce companies. A number of proposals have been made at the state and local levels that would impose additional taxes on the sale of goods and services through the Internet. These proposals, if adopted, could substantially impair the growth of electronic commerce and cause purchasing at our online store to be less attractive to customers as compared with traditional retail purchasing. The U.S. Congress has passed legislation limiting, for a limited period of time, the ability of the states to impose taxes on Internet- based transactions. Failure to renew this legislation could result in the imposition by various states of taxes on electronic commerce. Our stock price may be extremely volatile The market price of our common stock has fluctuated substantially in the past and is likely to fluctuate substantially in the future. In addition, the securities markets have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations and the market prices of the securities of Internet-related companies have been especially volatile. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. A securities class action lawsuit against us could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management's attention and resources. Our restated articles of incorporation and restated bylaws provide director and officer indemnification and limit their liability We may have to spend significant resources indemnifying our officers and directors or paying for damages caused by their conduct. The Washington Business Corporation Act provides for broad indemnification by corporations of their officers and directors, and our restated bylaws implement this indemnification to the fullest extent permitted under the Act as it currently exists or as it may be amended in the future. Similarly, our restated articles of incorporation include a provision that limits the liability of our directors to the fullest 23 extent permitted by the Act as it currently exists or as it may be amended in the future. Consequently, subject to this Act and to certain limited exceptions in our restated articles, none of our directors will be liable to us or to our shareholders for monetary damages resulting from his or her conduct as a director. We have anti-takeover provisions in place that make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us Provisions of our restated articles of incorporation, our restated bylaws and Washington law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so would be beneficial to our shareholders. For example, our restated articles of incorporation provide that our board of directors may, without shareholder approval, issue preferred stock with rights superior to the rights of the holders of our common stock. As a result, our board could issue preferred stock quickly and easily, adversely affecting the rights of holders of our common stock. Such preferred stock could include terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control of Egghead.com or make the removal of management more difficult. Also, our restated bylaws contain advance notice procedures with respect to shareholder proposals and the nomination of candidates for election as directors which could make it more difficult for our shareholders to propose a change of control or to change our board of directors. In addition, our restated articles of incorporation and our restated bylaws provide for the division of our board of directors into three classes, with the directors in each class serving for three-year terms, and one class being elected each year by our shareholders. Because this system of electing and removing directors generally makes it more difficult for shareholders to replace a majority of the board of directors, it may tend to discourage a third party from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to gain control of Egghead.com and may preserve the tenure of the current board of directors. Furthermore, Washington law imposes restrictions on certain transactions between a corporation and certain significant shareholders. The Washington Business Corporation Act prohibits a target corporation, with certain exceptions, from engaging in certain `'significant business transactions'' with an `'acquiring person'' (generally a person or group of persons that beneficially owns 10% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the target corporation) for five years from the date the person or group of persons became an `'acquiring person,'' unless a majority of the target corporation's board of directors approved the significant business transaction before the person or group of persons became an acquiring person. Generally, a `'significant business transaction'' includes a merger, asset or stock sale, and certain other transactions resulting in a financial benefit to the acquiring person. After the five-year period, a significant business transaction may occur, as long as it complies with certain `'fair price'' provisions of the statute. These provisions could delay or prevent a change of control of Egghead.com, even if such change of control would benefit our shareholders. 24 Part II. OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings None. ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders None. ITEM 5. Other Information 25 ITEM 6. Exhibits and Reports On Form 8-K a. Exhibits 2.1 Form of Company Voting Agreement dated July 13, 1999 between Onsale, Inc. and certain shareholders of Egghead.com, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to registrant's report on Form 8-K dated July 13, 1999) 2.2 Form of Parent Voting Agreement dated July 13, 1999 between Egghead.com, Inc. and certain stockholders of Onsale, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to registrant's report on Form 8-K dated July 13, 1999) 10.1 Amendment No. 1 to Egghead.com, Inc. Restated Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan. 10.2 Amendment No. 2 to Egghead.com, Inc. Restated Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan. 10.3 Executive Employment Agreement between Egghead.com, Inc., DJ & J Software Corporation and George P. Orban, dated September 20, 1999. 10.4 Employment Agreement between Egghead.com, Inc., Surplus Software, Inc. and Jonathan W. Brodeur, dated October 25, 1999. 10.5 Rentention Bonus Agreement between Egghead.com, Inc. and Jonathan W. Brodeur, dated July 13, 1999. 10.6 Second Amendment to Employment Agreement between Egghead.com, Inc. and Brian W. Bender, effective October 26, 1999. 10.7 Pledge Agreement by Egghead.com, Inc. for the benefit of Brian W. Bender, entered into as of September 9, 1999. 10.8 Form of Pledge Agreement by Egghead.com, Inc. for the benefit of each of the persons listed on Schedule 1 to the Agreement. 10.9 Pledge Agreement by Egghead.com, Inc. for the benefit of Jonathan W. Brodeur, entered into as of November 15, 1999. 10.10 Supplemental Retention Bonus Agreement between Egghead.com, Inc. and James Kalasky, entered into as of October 1, 1999 10.11 Promissory note signed by James Kalasky 10.12 Promissory note signed by Tommy Collins 27.1 Financial Data Schedule b. Reports on Form 8-K We filed a report on Form 8-K, dated July 13, 1999, to report, under Item 5 of Form 8-K, that we had entered into a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger with Onsale, Inc. and EO Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Onsale, Inc. 26 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of Vancouver, State of Washington, on the 16th day of November, 1999. EGGHEAD.COM, INC. By: /s/ Brian W. Bender --------------------------------------- Brian W. Bender Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and Secretary (Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) 27 EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibits 2.1 Form of Company Voting Agreement dated July 13, 1999 between Onsale, Inc. and certain shareholders of Egghead.com, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to registrant's report on Form 8-K dated July 13, 1999) 2.2 Form of Parent Voting Agreement dated July 13, 1999 between Egghead.com, Inc. and certain stockholders of Onsale, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to registrant's report on Form 8-K dated July 13, 1999) 10.1 Amendment No. 1 to Egghead.com, Inc. Restated Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan. 10.2 Amendment No. 2 to Egghead.com, Inc. Restated Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan. 10.3 Executive Employment Agreement between Egghead.com, Inc., DJ & J Software Corporation and George P. Orban, dated September 20, 1999. 10.4 Employment Agreement between Egghead.com, Inc., Surplus Software, Inc. and Jonathan W. Brodeur, dated October 25, 1999. 10.5 Rentention Bonus Agreement between Egghead.com, Inc. and Jonathan W. Brodeur, dated July 13, 1999. 10.6 Second Amendment to Employment Agreement between Egghead.com, Inc. and Brian W. Bender, effective October 26, 1999. 10.7 Pledge Agreement by Egghead.com, Inc. for the benefit of Brian W. Bender, entered into as of September 9, 1999. 10.8 Form of Pledge Agreement by Egghead.com, Inc. for the benefit of each of the persons listed on Schedule 1 to the Agreement. 10.9 Pledge Agreement by Egghead.com, Inc. for the benefit of Jonathan W. Brodeur, entered into as of November 15, 1999. 10.10 Supplemental Retention Bonus Agreement between Egghead.com, Inc. and James Kalasky, entered into as of October 1, 1999 10.11 Promissory note signed by James Kalasky 10.12 Promissory note signed by Tommy Collins 27.1 Financial Data Schedule 28