Exhibit 99.1
AN OPEN LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 19, 2001.


In light of the circumstances of September 11 we have decided to limit our
communications on Raging Bull to official announcements and postings both as
individual employees and as a company as a whole. We will avoid non-productive
debate with individuals claiming to be shareholders. The tenor and tone in such
debate in our opinion does not support our goal - maximization of shareholder
value. We do value communication with both our own shareholders and shareholders
of companies we are targeting. Consequently, we strongly urge all NTXY and SEED
shareholders to contact us with any questions and comments.

However, as you have probably noticed, Seedling has a number of hostile posters
that troll Raging Bull and continuously post negative and what Seedling
considers to be inaccurate messages. Thus, in our own defense we feel we need to
inform shareholders of the circumstances we believe to be behind the posts. We
believe the group of posters includes a number of disgruntled former associates
of our predecessor company who use multiple screen names to pursue a smear
campaign, namely MarkEdwards77, Akupoke, Purple Dirt, Earth of Purple and Sushi
Rice. As a matter of policy, we at Seedling would prefer to ignore such
individuals who are neither legitimate Seedling shareholders (according to our
transfer agent) nor, in our opinion, respectable members of the business
community. However, in order to prevent confusion, we find it prudent to provide
a bit of background on who we think these posters are, why we believe they
constantly bash Seedling, and why Seedling is in fact proudly resigned to their
smear campaign.

Seedling Technologies was formed in its present structure through the merger of
a delisted pink sheet company called Brighton Technologies (OTCBB: BGHT) with a
private, Oregon corporation called Seedling Technology Ventures. Seedling
Ventures was founded, grown, and funded by Douglas B. Spink, Seedling's Chairman
and CEO.

Seedling believes the negative posters listed above were intimately involved in
BGHT. We believe that evidence clearly suggests that a number of the screen
names involved in the constant attacks are the nomes de plumes of a group of
fund raisers who were closely tied to the former management team of BGHT and for
years acted as de-facto management and investor liaison at Brighton prior to the
Seedling merger. Akupoke, we believe is in fact Jeffery Dunster, who along with
his partner Daryll Fox, came into possession of several million shares of BGHT
under what Seedling has argued in court papers were false pretenses, both in
services never performed and in actual cash never paid for shares. Mark Edwards,
by his own written communications and posts on Raging Bull has admitted that he
was also involved in with the former fundraising team. He has also attempted to
intercede in the share dispute on behalf of the fundraising team, including
asking to have the shares in dispute transferred into his own name. Mr. Edwards
had also repeatedly asked Seedling for a job (which we were not willing to give
him) and borrowed $5,000 from the company to fly home after coming to "visit"
Seedling (which he has yet to repay).

Although we cannot definitively prove that any of screen names are in fact being
used by said former fundraisers (with exception of MarkEdwards77), the fact that
most of the aforementioned posters use names that have allusions to Hawaii in
them seems telling, seeing how the team of fundraisers are all from Hawaii.
Furthermore, we have noticed that a number of these posters were very positive
in their original postings on SEED, but turned negative around the time SEED
informed the fundraisers in mid-2001 that SEED would be pursuing legal remedies
to compel return of the shares. Lastly, we believe it is also telling that a
common theme among these posters has been either transfer of shares or finding
out the identity of SEED's transfer agent. It is SEED's position that
shareholders who own their shares free-trading, as many of these posters claim,
do not need the services of a transfer agent.



After the Seedling Ventures/Brighton merger (approved by a majority of
Brighton's non-management shareholders), Seedling pressed these individuals for
return of shares that Seedling considered ill-gotten. However, we were refused
despite what we consider to be months of efforts to find a reasonable compromise
and avoid legal avenues. Consequently, Seedling had no choice in our opinion but
to cancel the shares and refuse transfer of said shares. Seedling has since
learned that a number of these disputed shares have been sold to other people in
exchange for cash and other services via faxes and phone calls from recipients
of the disputed shares.

Seedling filed suit against these Hawaiian fundraisers in Oregon court to compel
return of the shares. Prior to this filing, a member of the fundraising team
repeatedly verbally threatened Seedling CEO Spink that he would "drive Seedling
into the ground" through anonymous internet postings - including on Raging Bull
- if we did not allow him to keep his shares in our company. He also threatened
character assassination against Spink. The shares in question represent more
than 10% of the total outstanding capital stock of Seedling, and are thus no
small matter. As a public company, SEED cannot allow what we consider to be a
non-accretive dilution of shareholder value. Seedling has already won a TRO
against approximately 2.2 million shares that Mr. Dunster admitted before a
judge that he had not paid for. . Seedling informed the fundraising team of our
intent to pursue legal remedies in April of 2000 and if one carefully examines
the posts of a number of the negative posters, the reader will notice that their
campaign against Seedling started at almost exactly the same time that Seedling
informed them of our decision to seek legal redress. We formally filed the
lawsuit June 6, 2001. We informed the parties in question several months earlier
of our intention to pursue legal action. The suit is currently pending in
Multnomah County Court, case number CV 01-831 JE.

Furthermore, if you read the many and vociferous posts you will find, despite
their claims to be interested shareholders, much of their focus has been on
trying to force Seedling to transfer shares. Generally, shareholders who acquire
their shares in a legitimate manner never need to find out whom the transfer
agent is. In Seedling's opinion, shareholders who acquire their shares via open
market transactions (as most of these Hawaiian posters claim to have) do not
need the services of a transfer agent. The name of the transfer agent was posted
on Raging Bull by one of the hostile posters we have named above. Since then,
according to our transfer agent, a number of the former fundraisers have
repeatedly called and harassed Seedling's transfer agent in an attempt to move
their shares - which are subject to legal proceedings - into other names and
overseas companies. Additionally, the volume and abusiveness of calls to the
transfer agent forced the transfer agent to seek a voluntary interpleader
agreement which transferred the shares in question to the custody of the court
in Oregon. Of course, these efforts have done nothing but occupy everyone's time
since the shares are frozen during the lawsuit. Already, Seedling has won a
default judgment on over 700,000 of the shares in the lawsuit.

Seedling also believes that the fact that the aforementioned posters choose to
post negative messages on boards of other companies undermines their claims to
be legitimate shareholders. Seedling believes that rational investors want to
see the companies they hold shares in generate revenue and make profits.
However, Akupoke, MarkEdwards77, Earth of Purple and Purple Dirt have chosen to
post their negative messages on the CFON, NTXY, GSVI, NXNW and STG bulletin
boards, all companies Seedling has done or has sought to transact business with.
By posting extremely negative messages these other boards, these posters, in
Seedling's opinion attempted or are attempting to torpedo Seedling's chances of
successfully proposing and closing transactions - something that seems counter
to what a shareholder interested in share accretion would want.

Seedling regrets that many honest individuals had been promised Seedling shares
under what Seedling considers to be false pretenses. In many cases, these people
paid real cash to buy shares that were never available to transfer in the first
place. However, Seedling never authorized the sale of these shares and was not
part of these fundraising processes.

                                       2


Seedling inherited this cast of characters when we undertook the turnaround and
restructuring of Brighton in late 2000. Brighton, which had represented itself
as being involved in selling IT technology in China, had at that time not filed
its required reports with the SEC for several years. Consequently, it had been
delisted from the OTC Bulletin Board and its share price dropped from $121.5 per
share in August of 1996 to approximate $0.95 per share as of November of 2000
(after several reverse splits, per Nasdaq.com). Brighton had written off all of
its assets by late 2000, and its auditor had publicly questioned its ability to
continue as an ongoing concern. The company had also publicly considered
bankruptcy according to SEC filings. Promising subsidiaries, such as Brighton
Equipment and Easi-Link, had been spun out of Brighton by Brighton's former CEO.
Several were sold to him or his associates for $1. Seedling has won a string of
court victories against the former CEO in separate litigation in New Jersey as
we seek to repatriate those transferred assets.

Seedling believed that Brighton and its shareholders' investments could be saved
through hard work and a willingness to hold the "old guard" accountable for
years of what we consider to be neglect. We are a company whose business model
centers on upholding shareholders rights. Because Brighton was so deeply
troubled, Seedling Ventures' shareholders retained a majority of the merged
company, as is typical in a reverse merger. This merger - which was supported
and approved by a majority of Brighton's own outside shareholders - was, in
Seedling's opinion, the only way Brighton would ever survive in any form at all.
By the time of the merger the company was effectively dead. Seedling rescued
Brighton and the "dilution" Brighton's shareholders experienced was a saving
grace compared to the bankruptcy proceedings that in all probability awaited
Brighton without Seedling. Since the merger, many former Brighton shareholders
have invested in Seedling itself and we consider our investor base to be a loyal
and wonderful group of people. We are more than willing to provide names and
contact information of our satisfied shareholders. Seedling's new management has
received dozens and dozens of calls, emails, and letters from shareholders
heartened to hear that someone is willing to hold the old guard to task and do
the hard work of rebuilding their company from its near-death state.

Seedling has brought litigation against the former Brighton management to
recover the books and records of Brighton so that we can file our required SEC
filings, become fully SEC compliant, and be relisted on the OTC bulletin board.
The former management group resisted turning over the books and records for
nearly six months, and was eventually ordered by a judge in New Jersey to do so.
Despite this, the former management group has continued, in Seedling's opinion,
to evade legal orders and is still trying to resist turning over the records of
companies Seedling believes it rightfully owns. However, Seedling has been
successful in all of its legal actions thus far and believes that it will soon
have the books and records we need to complete our fiscal year 2000 audit and
relisting. In fact, Seedling's management has already filed SEC 10K forms for
1998 and 1999 - something former management never did despite spending years at
the company and raising millions of dollars.

It is unfortunate for the shareholders of Seedling and for the shareholders of
Seedling clients and partner companies that this tiny cabal of individuals has
chosen, in Seedling's opinion, to carry out a smear campaign on Raging Bull.
However, given Seedling experiences with the fundraising team and former
management, Seedling and all of our real shareholders, we are glad to have
people like this as enemies for we would never want these people to be anything
but. We are in the business of forcibly removing management teams and returning
value to shareholders. In such a business, one is bound to make enemies since,
in Seedling's opinion, few unethical management teams appreciate having their
unfettered access to shareholder money closed off.

We at Seedling thrive on shareholder communication; it is a fundamental tenet of
our management approach and our business model itself. Contact information can
be found at Seedling's website, www.seedling.net. We would love to be able to
answer the financial questions that are being posted under the pretense of being
a "concerned shareholder" because nothing combats dishonesty better than the
truth. However, we are bound by the rules of the SEC's Reg. FD, which prohibits
selective release of financial and other material information, as posting on RB
would be. However, we will try to provide shareholders with as much information
as is permitted under SEC regulations.

                                       3


As a "Pink Sheet" company currently, were are in fact technically not required
to file any SEC reports at all; however, since our goal has always been to
return our company to the full OTC and eventually the AMEX or Nasdaq in the
future, we will not slacken in our efforts to correct what we consider to be the
excesses and dishonesty of the former management and bring the truth to the
shareholders. Additionally, no slander effort will compel us to allow whom we
consider to be dishonest persons to defraud our investors by taking shares from
the company. We have chosen to fight these individuals in a court of law on
behalf of all our shareholders, and it is a fight we believe we will win in the
courtroom. While they can continue to smear us anonymously here, they cannot
change what we consider to be their lack of ethics and respectability.

Thank you for taking the time to read this. Please feel free to call, fax,
write, or email Seedling. We would like to hear from you. Seedling is currently
the beneficial owner of 1600 shares of NTXY stock.

This does not constitute a request for a proxy. You will receive a definitive
proxy statement the same time as a proxy is requested from you. You should
carefully read the proxy statement when it is available, because it contains
important information. You may obtain a copy of the proxy statement, when
available, free from the SEC website at www.sec.gov.


CONTACT:   Paul Peterson
           Seedling Technologies Corporation
           800.893.8894
           www.seedling.net

                                       4