UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 1999
-------------------------------------------------
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
----------------------- ----------------------
-----------------------
For Quarter Ended March 31, 1999 Commission File No. 0-19135
American Income Partners V-D Limited Partnership
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts 04-3090151
- ------------------------------- -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
88 Broad Street, Boston, MA 02110
- ------------------------------- -------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (617) 854-5800
-----------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed
since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
----- -----
APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and
reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13, or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan
confirmed by a court during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No
----- -----
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
Page
------
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Item 1. Financial Statements
Statement of Financial Position
at March 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998 3
Statement of Operations
for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998 4
Statement of Cash Flows
for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998 5
Notes to the Financial Statements 6-10
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations 11-15
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION:
Items 1 - 6 16
2
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
MARCH 31, 1999 AND DECEMBER 31, 1998
(UNAUDITED)
March 31, December 31,
1999 1998
--------------- ---------------
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,740,000 $ 3,761,322
Rents receivable 37,285 38,480
Accounts receivable - affiliate 39,526 25,840
Equipment at cost, net of accumulated depreciation
of $1,610,980 and $1,670,057 at March 31, 1999
and December 31, 1998, respectively 191,096 207,237
--------------- ---------------
Total assets $ 4,007,907 $ 4,032,879
=============== ===============
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Accrued liabilities $ 224,500 $ 258,500
Accrued liabilities - affiliate 14,311 6,112
Cash distributions payable to partners 56,869 56,869
--------------- ---------------
Total liabilities 295,680 321,481
--------------- ---------------
Partners' capital (deficit):
General Partner (346,441) (346,483)
Limited Partnership Interests
(480,227 Units; initial purchase price of $25 each) 4,058,668 4,057,881
--------------- ---------------
Total partners' capital 3,712,227 3,711,398
--------------- ---------------
Total liabilities and partners' capital $ 4,007,907 $ 4,032,879
=============== ===============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
these financial statements.
3
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND 1998
(UNAUDITED)
1999 1998
--------------- ---------------
Income:
Lease revenue $ 63,859 $ 93,500
Interest income 40,569 36,625
Gain on sale of equipment 14,500 8,600
--------------- ---------------
Total income 118,928 138,725
--------------- ---------------
Expenses:
Depreciation 16,141 46,910
Equipment management fees - affiliate 2,557 4,039
Operating expenses - affiliate 42,532 32,221
--------------- ---------------
Total expenses 61,230 83,170
--------------- ---------------
Net income $ 57,698 $ 55,555
=============== ===============
Net income
per limited partnership unit $ 0.11 $ 0.11
=============== ===============
Cash distribution declared
per limited partnership unit $ 0.11 $ 0.11
=============== ===============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
these financial statements.
4
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND 1998
(UNAUDITED)
1999 1998
--------------- ---------------
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities:
Net income $ 57,698 $ 55,555
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from
operating activities:
Depreciation 16,141 46,910
Gain on sale of equipment (14,500) (8,600)
Changes in assets and liabilities
Decrease (increase) in:
Rents receivable 1,195 (2,311)
Accounts receivable - affiliate (13,686) (12,512)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accrued liabilities (34,000) 652
Accrued liabilities - affiliate 8,199 (5,294)
Deferred rental income -- (440)
--------------- ---------------
Net cash from operating activities 21,047 73,960
--------------- ---------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from equipment sales 14,500 8,600
--------------- ---------------
Net cash from investing activities 14,500 8,600
--------------- ---------------
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Distributions paid (56,869) (56,869)
--------------- ---------------
Net cash used in financing activities (56,869) (56,869)
--------------- ---------------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (21,322) 25,691
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 3,761,322 2,772,762
--------------- ---------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 3,740,000 $ 2,798,453
=============== ===============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
these financial statements.
5
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 1999
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION
- ------------------------------
The financial statements presented herein are prepared in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles and the instructions for preparing Form
10-Q under Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and are unaudited. As such, these financial statements do not include
all information and footnote disclosures required under generally accepted
accounting principles for complete financial statements and, accordingly, the
accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
footnotes presented in the 1998 Annual Report. Except as disclosed herein, there
has been no material change to the information presented in the footnotes to the
1998 Annual Report.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal and
recurring adjustments) considered necessary to present fairly the financial
position at March 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998 and results of operations for
the three month periods ended March 31, 1999 and 1998 have been made and are
reflected.
NOTE 2 - CASH
- -------------
At March 31, 1999, the Partnership had $3,626,568 invested in federal
agency discount notes and in reverse repurchase agreements secured by U.S.
Treasury Bills or interests in U.S. Government securities.
NOTE 3 - REVENUE RECOGNITION
- ----------------------------
Rents are payable to the Partnership monthly or quarterly and no
significant amounts are calculated on factors other than the passage of time.
The leases are accounted for as operating leases and are noncancellable. Rents
received prior to their due dates are deferred. Future minimum rents of $211,145
are due as follows:
For the year ending March 31, 2000 $ 95,803
2001 89,873
2002 25,469
-----------
Total $ 211,145
===========
NOTE 4 - EQUIPMENT
- ------------------
The following is a summary of equipment owned by the Partnership at March
31, 1999. Remaining Lease Term (Months), as used below, represents the number of
months remaining from March 31, 1999 under contracted lease terms and is
presented as a range when more than one lease agreement is contained in the
stated equipment category. A Remaining Lease Term equal to zero reflects
equipment either held for sale or re-lease or being leased on a month-to-month
basis. In the opinion of EFG, the acquisition cost of the equipment did not
exceed its fair market value.
6
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Remaining
Lease Term Equipment
Equipment Type (Months) at Cost
- ------------------------------ ---------- ---------------
Materials handling 0-17 807,258
Trailers/intermodal containers 27-28 357,886
Communications 0 229,633
Research and test 0 105,805
Manufacturing 0 95,460
Construction and mining 0 93,600
Motor vehicles 0 64,367
Tractors and heavy duty trucks 0 46,921
Computers and peripherals 0 1,146
---------------
Total equipment cost 1,802,076
Accumulated depreciation (1,610,980)
---------------
Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation $ 191,096
===============
At March 31, 1999, the Partnership's equipment portfolio included equipment
having a proportionate original cost of $171,719, representing approximately 10%
of total equipment cost.
At March 31, 1999, the Partnership was not holding any equipment not
subject to a lease and no equipment was held for sale or re-lease. The summary
above includes equipment being leased on a month-to-month basis.
NOTE 5 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
- -----------------------------------
All operating expenses incurred by the Partnership are paid by EFG on
behalf of the Partnership and EFG is reimbursed at its actual cost for such
expenditures. Fees and other costs incurred during each of the three month
periods ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, which were paid or accrued by the
Partnership to EFG or its Affiliates, are as follows:
1999 1998
------------- -------------
Equipment management fees $ 2,557 $ 4,039
Administrative charges 15,441 15,441
Reimbursable operating expenses
due to third parties 27,091 16,780
------------- -------------
Total $ 45,089 $ 36,260
============= =============
All rents and proceeds from the sale of equipment are paid directly to
either EFG or to a lender. EFG temporarily deposits collected funds in a
separate interest-bearing escrow account prior to remittance to the Partnership.
At March 31, 1999, the Partnership was owed $39,526 by EFG for such funds and
the interest thereon. These funds were remitted to the Partnership in April
1999.
7
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
NOTE 6 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
- --------------------------
In January 1998, certain plaintiffs (the "Plaintiffs") filed a class and
derivative action, captioned LEONARD ROSENBLUM, ET AL. V. EQUIS FINANCIAL GROUP
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Florida (the "Court") on behalf of a proposed class of
investors in 28 equipment leasing programs sponsored by EFG, including the
Partnership (collectively, the "Nominal Defendants"), against EFG and a number
of its affiliates, including the General Partner, as defendants (collectively,
the "Defendants"). Certain of the Plaintiffs, on or about June 24, 1997, had
filed an earlier derivative action, captioned LEONARD ROSENBLUM, ET AL. V. EQUIS
FINANCIAL GROUP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., in the Superior Court of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts on behalf of the Nominal Defendants against the
Defendants. Both actions are referred to herein collectively as the "Class
Action Lawsuit."
The Plaintiffs have asserted, among other things, claims against the
Defendants on behalf of the Nominal Defendants for violations of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, common law fraud, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary
duty, and violations of the partnership or trust agreements that govern each of
the Nominal Defendants. The Defendants have denied, and continue to deny, that
any of them have committed or threatened to commit any violations of law or
breached any fiduciary duties to the Plaintiffs or the Nominal Defendants.
On July 16, 1998, counsel for the Defendants and the Plaintiffs executed a
Stipulation of Settlement setting forth terms pursuant to which a settlement of
the Class Action Lawsuit is intended to be achieved and which, among other
things, is expected to reduce the burdens and expenses attendant to continuing
litigation. The Stipulation of Settlement was based upon and superseded a
Memorandum of Understanding between the parties dated March 9, 1998 which
outlined the terms of a possible settlement. The Stipulation of Settlement was
filed with the Court on July 23, 1998 and was preliminarily approved by the
Court on August 20, 1998 when the Court issued its "Order Preliminarily
Approving Settlement, Conditionally Certifying Settlement Class and Providing
for Notice of, and Hearing on, the Proposed Settlement" (the "August 20 Order").
Prior to issuing a final order, the Court will hold a fairness hearing that will
be open to all interested parties and permit any party to object to the
settlement. The investors of the Partnership and all other plaintiff class
members in the Class Action Lawsuit will receive a Notice of Settlement and
other information pertinent to the settlement of their claims that will be
mailed to them in advance of the fairness hearing. Since first executing the
Stipulation of Settlement, the Court has scheduled two fairness hearings, the
first on December 11, 1998 and the second on March 19, 1999, each of which was
postponed because of delays in finalizing certain information materials that are
subject to regulatory review prior to being distributed to investors.
On March 15, 1999, counsel for the Plaintiffs and the Defendants entered
into an amended stipulation of settlement (the "Amended Stipulation") which was
filed with the Court on March 15, 1999. The Amended Stipulation was
preliminarily approved by the Court by its "Modified Order Preliminarily
Approving Settlement, Conditionally Certifying Settlement Class and Providing
For Notice of, and Hearing On, the Proposed Settlement" dated March 22, 1999
(the "March 22 Order"). The Amended Stipulation, among other things, divides the
Class Action Lawsuit into two separate sub-classes that can be settled
individually. This revision is expected to expedite the settlement of one
sub-class by the middle of 1999. However, the second sub-class, involving the
Partnership and 10 affiliated partnerships (collectively referred to as the
"Exchange Partnerships"), is expected to remain pending for a longer period due,
in part, to the complexity of the proposed settlement pertaining to this class.
Specifically, the settlement of the second sub-class is premised on the
consolidation of the Exchange Partnerships' net assets (the "Consolidation"),
subject to certain conditions, into a single successor company ("Newco"). Under
the proposed Consolidation, the partners of the Exchange Partnerships would
receive both common stock in Newco and a cash distribution; and thereupon the
Exchange Partnerships would be dissolved. In addition, EFG would contribute
certain management contracts, operations personnel, and business
8
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
opportunities to Newco and cancel its current management contracts with all of
the Exchange Partnerships. Newco would operate as a finance company specializing
in the acquisition, financing and servicing of equipment leases for its own
account and for the account of others on a contract basis. Newco also would use
its best efforts to list its shares on the NASDAQ National Market or another
national exchange or market as soon after the Consolidation as Newco deems that
market conditions and its business operations are suitable for listing its
shares and Newco has satisfied all necessary regulatory and listing
requirements. The potential benefits and risks of the Consolidation will be
presented in a Solicitation Statement that will be mailed to all of the partners
of the Exchange Partnerships as soon as the associated regulatory review process
is completed and at least 60 days prior to the fairness hearing. A preliminary
Solicitation Statement was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 24, 1998 and remains pending. Class members will be notified of the
actual fairness hearing date when it is confirmed.
One of the principal objectives of the Consolidation is to create a company
that would have the potential to generate more value for the benefit of existing
limited partners than other alternatives, including continuing the Partnership's
customary business operations until all of its assets are disposed in the
ordinary course of business. To facilitate the realization of this objective,
the Amended Stipulation provides, among other things, that commencing March 22,
1999, the Exchange Partnerships may collectively invest up to 40% of the total
aggregate net asset values of all of the Exchange Partnerships in any
investment, including additional equipment and other business activities that
the general partners of the Exchange Partnerships and EFG reasonably believe to
be consistent with the anticipated business interests and objectives of Newco,
subject to certain limitations, including that the Exchange Partnerships retain
sufficient cash balances to pay their respective shares of the cash distribution
referenced above in connection with the proposed Consolidation.
In the absence of the Court's authorization to enter into such activities,
the Partnership's Restated Agreement, as amended, would not permit new
investment activities without the approval of limited partners owning a majority
of the Partnership's outstanding Units. Accordingly, to the extent that the
Partnership invests in new equipment, the Manager (being EFG) will (i) defer,
until the earlier of the effective date of the Consolidation or December 31,
1999, any acquisition fees resulting therefrom and (ii) limit its management
fees on all such assets to 2% of rental income. In the event that the
Consolidation is consummated, all such acquisition and management fees will be
paid to Newco. To the extent that the Partnership invests in other business
activities not consisting of equipment acquisitions, the Manager will forego any
acquisition fees and management fees related to such investments. In the event
that the Partnership has acquired new investments, but the Partnership does not
participate in the Consolidation, Newco will acquire such new investments for an
amount equal to the Partnership's net equity investment plus an annualized
return thereon of 7.5%. Finally, in the event that the Partnership has acquired
new investments and the Consolidation is not effected, the General Partner will
use its best efforts to divest all such new investments in an orderly and timely
fashion and the Manager will cancel or return to the Partnership any acquisition
or management fees resulting from such new investments.
The Amended Stipulation and previous Stipulation of Settlement prescribe
certain conditions necessary to effecting final settlements, including providing
the partners of the Exchange Partnerships with the opportunity to object to the
participation of their partnership in the Consolidation. Assuming the proposed
settlement is effected according to present terms, the Partnership's share of
legal fees and expenses related to the Class Action Lawsuit is estimated to be
approximately $82,000, all of which was accrued and expensed by the Partnership
in 1998. In addition, the Partnership's share of fees and expenses related to
the proposed Consolidation is estimated to be approximately $215,000, all of
which was also accrued and expensed by the Partnership in 1998.
While the Court's August 20 Order enjoined certain class members, including
all of the partners of the Partnership, from transferring, selling, assigning,
giving, pledging, hypothecating, or otherwise disposing of any Units pending the
Court's final determination of whether the settlement should be approved, the
March 22 Order
9
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
permits the partners to transfer Units to family members or as a result of the
divorce, disability or death of the partner. No other transfers are permitted
pending the Court's final determination of whether the settlement should be
approved. The provision of the August 20 Order which enjoined the General
Partners of the Exchange Partnerships from, among other things, recording any
transfers not in accordance with the Court's order remains effective.
There can be no assurance that settlement of either sub-class of the Class
Action Lawsuit will receive final Court approval and be effected. There also can
be no assurance that all or any of the Exchange Partnerships will participate in
the Consolidation because if limited partners owning more than one-third of the
outstanding Units of a partnership object to the Consolidation, then that
partnership will be excluded from the Consolidation. The General Partner and its
affiliates, in consultation with counsel, concur that there is a reasonable
basis to believe that final settlements of each sub-class will be achieved.
However, in the absence of final settlements approved by the Court, the
Defendants intend to defend vigorously against the claims asserted in the Class
Action Lawsuit. Neither the General Partner nor its affiliates can predict with
any degree of certainty the cost of continuing litigation to the Partnership or
the ultimate outcome.
10
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10-Q
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certain statements in this annual report of American Income Partners V-D
Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") that are not historical fact constitute
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are subject to a variety of risks and
uncertainties. There are a number of important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking
statements made herein. These factors include, but are not limited to, the
outcome of the Class Action Lawsuit described in Note 6 to the accompanying
financial statements, the collection of all rents due under the Partnership's
lease agreements and the remarketing of the Partnership's equipment.
YEAR 2000 ISSUE
- ---------------
The Year 2000 Issue generally refers to the capacity of computer
programming logic to correctly identify the calendar year. Many companies
utilize computer programs or hardware with date sensitive software or embedded
chips that could interpret dates ending in "00" as the year 1900 rather than the
year 2000. In certain cases, such errors could result in system failures or
miscalculations that disrupt the operations of the affected businesses. The
Partnership uses information systems provided by Equis Financial Group Limited
Partnership (formerly American Finance Group) ("EFG") and has no information
systems of its own. EFG has adopted a plan to address the Year 2000 Issue that
consists of four phases: assessment, remediation, testing, and implementation
and has elected to utilize principally internal resources to perform all phases.
EFG has completed substantially all of its Year 2000 project at an aggregate
cost of less than $50,000 and at a di minimus cost to the Partnership. All costs
incurred in connection with EFG's Year 2000 project have been expensed as
incurred.
EFG's primary information software was coded by IBM at the point of
original design to use a four-digit field to identify calendar year. All of the
Partnership's lease billings, cash receipts and equipment remarketing processes
are performed using this proprietary software. In addition, EFG has gathered
information about the Year 2000 readiness of significant vendors and third-party
servicers and continues to monitor developments in this area. All of EFG's
peripheral computer technologies, such as its network operating system and
third-party software applications, including payroll, depreciation processing,
and electronic banking, have been evaluated for potential programming changes
and have required only minor modifications to function properly with respect to
dates in the year 2000 and thereafter. EFG understands that each of its and the
Partnership's significant vendors and third-party servicers are in the process,
or have completed the process, of making their systems Year 2000 compliant.
Substantially all parties queried have indicated that their systems would be
Year 2000 compliant by the end of 1998.
Presently, EFG is not aware of any outside customer with a Year 2000 Issue
that would have a material effect on the Partnership's results of operations,
liquidity, or financial position. The Partnership's equipment leases were
structured as triple net leases, meaning that the lessees are responsible for,
among other things, (i) maintaining and servicing all equipment during the lease
term, (ii) ensuring that all equipment functions properly and is returned in
good condition, normal wear and tear excepted, and (iii) insuring the assets
against casualty and other events of loss. Non-compliance with lease terms on
the part of a lessee, including failure to address Year 2000 Issues could result
in lost revenues and impairment of residual values of the Partnership's
equipment assets under a worst-case scenario.
EFG believes that its Year 2000 compliance plan will be effective in
resolving all material Year 2000 risks in a timely manner and that the Year 2000
Issue will not pose significant operational problems with respect to its
computer systems or result in a system failure or disruption of its or the
Partnership's business operations. However, EFG has no means of ensuring that
all customers, vendors and third-party servicers will conform ultimately to Year
2000 standards. The effect of this risk to the Partnership is not determinable.
11
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10-Q
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
1998:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Partnership was organized in 1990 as a direct-participation equipment
leasing program to acquire a diversified portfolio of capital equipment subject
to lease agreements with third parties. Presently, the Partnership is a Nominal
Defendant in a Class Action Lawsuit, the outcome of which could significantly
alter the nature of the Partnership's organization and its future business
operations. See Note 6 to the accompanying financial statements. Pursuant to the
Restated Agreement, as amended, the Partnership is scheduled to be dissolved by
December 31, 2001.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the three months ended March 31, 1999, the Partnership recognized lease
revenue of $63,859 compared to $93,500 for the same period in 1998. The decrease
in lease revenue from 1998 to 1999 resulted principally from renewal lease term
expirations and the sale of equipment. The Partnership also earns interest
income from temporary investments of rental receipts and equipment sales
proceeds in short-term instruments.
The Partnership's equipment portfolio includes certain assets in which the
Partnership holds a proportionate ownership interest. In such cases, the
remaining interests are owned by an affiliated equipment leasing program
sponsored by EFG. Proportionate equipment ownership enabled the Partnership to
further diversify its equipment portfolio at inception by participating in the
ownership of selected assets, thereby reducing the general levels of risk which
could have resulted from a concentration in any single equipment type, industry
or lessee. The Partnership and each affiliate individually report, in proportion
to their respective ownership interests, their respective shares of assets,
liabilities, revenues, and expenses associated with the equipment.
For the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, the Partnership sold
equipment that had been fully depreciated to existing lessees and third parties.
These sales resulted in a net gain, for financial statement purposes, of $14,500
and $8,600 for the respective periods.
It cannot be determined whether future sales of equipment will result in a
net gain or a net loss to the Partnership, as such transactions will be
dependent upon the condition and type of equipment being sold and its
marketability at the time of sale. In addition, the amount of gain or loss
reported for financial statement purposes is partly a function of the amount of
accumulated depreciation associated with the equipment being sold.
The ultimate realization of residual value for any type of equipment is
dependent upon many factors, including EFG's ability to sell and re-lease
equipment. Changing market conditions, industry trends, technological advances,
and many other events can converge to enhance or detract from asset values at
any given time. EFG attempts to monitor these changes in order to identify
opportunities which may be advantageous to the Partnership and which will
maximize total cash returns for each asset.
The total economic value realized upon final disposition of each asset is
comprised of all primary lease term revenue generated from that asset, together
with its residual value. The latter consists of cash proceeds realized upon the
asset's sale in addition to all other cash receipts obtained from renting the
asset on a re-lease, renewal or month-to-month basis. The Partnership classifies
such residual rental payments as lease revenue. Consequently, the amount of gain
or loss reported in the financial statements is not necessarily indicative of
the total residual value the Partnership achieved from leasing the equipment.
Depreciation expense was $16,141 for the three months ended March 31, 1999
compared to $46,910 for the same period in 1998. For financial reporting
purposes, to the extent that an asset is held on primary lease term, the
Partnership depreciates the difference between (i) the cost of the asset and
(ii) the estimated residual value of
12
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10-Q
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
the asset on a straight-line basis over such term. For purposes of this policy,
estimated residual values represent estimates of equipment values at the date of
primary lease expiration. To the extent that equipment is held beyond its
primary lease term, the Partnership continues to depreciate the remaining net
book value of the asset on a straight-line basis over the asset's remaining
economic life.
Management fees were approximately 4% and 4.3% of lease revenue for the
three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Management fees are
based on 5% of gross lease revenue generated by operating leases and 2% of gross
lease revenue generated by full payout leases.
Operating expenses were $42,532 for the three months ended March 31, 1999
compared to $32,221 for the same period in 1998. Operating expenses consist
principally of administrative charges, professional service costs, such as audit
and other legal fees, as well as printing, distribution and remarketing
expenses. In certain cases, equipment storage or repairs and maintenance costs
may be incurred in connection with equipment being remarketed.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES AND DISCUSSION OF CASH FLOWS
- ------------------------------------------------------------
The Partnership by its nature is a limited life entity. As an equipment
leasing program, the Partnership's principal operating activities derive from
asset rental transactions. Accordingly, the Partnership's principal source of
cash from operations is generally provided by the collection of periodic rents.
These cash inflows are used to pay management fees and operating costs.
Operating activities generated net cash inflows of $21,047 and $73,960 during
the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Future renewal,
re-lease and equipment sale activities will cause a decline in the Partnership's
lease revenue and corresponding sources of operating cash. Overall, expenses
associated with rental activities, such as management fees, and net cash flow
from operating activities will also decline as the Partnership experiences a
higher frequency of remarketing events.
Cash realized from asset disposal transactions is reported under investing
activities on the accompanying Statement of Cash Flows. During the three months
ended March 31, 1999, the Partnership realized $14,500 in equipment sale
proceeds compared to $8,600 for the same period in 1998. Future inflows of cash
from asset disposals will vary in timing and amount and will be influenced by
many factors including, but not limited to, the frequency and timing of lease
expirations, the type of equipment being sold, its condition and age, and future
market conditions.
At March 31, 1999, the Partnership was due aggregate future minimum lease
payments of $211,145 from contractual lease agreements (see Note 3 to the
financial statements). At the expiration of the individual primary and renewal
lease terms underlying the Partnership's future minimum lease payments, the
Partnership will sell the equipment or enter re-lease or renewal agreements when
considered advantageous by the General Partner and EFG. Such future remarketing
activities will result in the realization of additional cash inflows in the form
of equipment sale proceeds or rents from renewals and re-leases, the timing and
extent of which cannot be predicted with certainty. This is because the timing
and extent of remarketing events often is dependent upon the needs and interests
of the existing lessees. Some lessees may choose to renew their lease contracts,
while others may elect to return the equipment. In the latter instances, the
equipment could be re-leased to another lessee or sold to a third party.
Accordingly, as the terms of the currently existing contractual lease agreements
expire, the cash flows of the Partnership will become less predictable. In
addition, the Partnership will have cash needs to pay management fees and
operating expenses.
There are no formal restrictions under the Restated Agreement, as amended,
that materially limit the Partnership's ability to pay cash distributions,
except that the General Partner may suspend or limit cash distributions to
ensure that the Partnership maintains sufficient working capital reserves to
cover, among other
13
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10-Q
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
things, operating costs and potential expenditures, such as refurbishment costs
to remarket equipment upon lease expiration. Liquidity is especially important
as the Partnership matures and sells equipment, because the remaining equipment
base consists of fewer revenue-producing assets that are available to cover
prospective cash disbursements. Insufficient liquidity could inhibit the
Partnership's ability to sustain its operations or maximize the realization of
proceeds from remarketing its remaining assets.
In addition, the Partnership is a Nominal Defendant in a Class Action
Lawsuit described in Note 6 to the accompanying financial statements. A
preliminary court order has allowed the Partnership to invest in new equipment
or other activities, subject to certain limitations, effective March 22, 1999.
Until the Class Action Lawsuit is adjudicated, the General Partner does not
expect that the level of future quarterly cash distributions paid by the
Partnership will be increased above amounts paid in the first quarter of 1999.
In addition, the proposed settlement, if effected, will materially change the
future organizational structure and business interests of the Partnership, as
well as its cash distribution policies. See Note 6 to the accompanying financial
statements.
Cash distributions to the General Partner and Recognized Owners are
declared and generally paid within fifteen days following the end of each
calendar quarter. The payment of such distributions is presented as a component
of financing activities. For the three months ended March 31, 1999, the
Partnership declared total cash distributions of Distributable Cash From
Operations and Distributable Cash From Sales and Refinancings of $56,869. In
accordance with the Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited
Partnership, the Recognized Owners were allocated 95% of these distributions, or
$54,026 and the General Partner was allocated 5%, or $2,843. The first quarter
1999 cash distribution was paid on April 15, 1999.
Cash distributions paid to the Recognized Owners consist of both a return
of and a return on capital. Cash distributions do not represent and are not
indicative of yield on investment. Actual yield on investment cannot be
determined with any certainty until conclusion of the Partnership and will be
dependent upon the collection of all future contracted rents, the generation of
renewal and/or re-lease rents, and the residual value realized for each asset at
its disposal date.
The Partnership's capital account balances for federal income tax and for
financial reporting purposes are different primarily due to differing treatments
of income and expense items for income tax purposes in comparison to financial
reporting purposes (generally referred to as permanent or timing differences;
see Note 5 to the financial statements presented in the Partnership's 1998
Annual Report). For instance, selling commissions and organization and offering
costs pertaining to syndication of the Partnership's limited partnership units
are not deductible for federal income tax purposes, but are recorded as a
reduction of partners' capital for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, such
differences are permanent differences between capital accounts for financial
reporting and federal income tax purposes. Other differences between the bases
of capital accounts for federal income tax and financial reporting purposes
occur due to timing differences. Such items consist of the cumulative difference
between income or loss for tax purposes and financial statement income or loss
and the difference between distributions (declared vs. paid) for income tax and
financial reporting purposes. The principal component of the cumulative
difference between financial statement income or loss and tax income or loss
results from different depreciation policies for book and tax purposes.
For financial reporting purposes, the General Partner has accumulated a
capital deficit at March 31, 1999. This is the result of aggregate cash
distributions to the General Partner being in excess of its capital contribution
of $1,000 and its allocation of financial statement net income or loss.
Ultimately, the existence of a capital deficit for the General Partner for
financial reporting purposes is not indicative of any further capital
obligations to the Partnership by the General Partner. The Amended and Restated
Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership requires that, upon the
dissolution of the Partnership, the General Partner will be required to
contribute
14
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10-Q
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
to the Partnership an amount equal to any negative balance which may exist in
the General Partner's tax capital account. At December 31, 1998, the General
Partner had a positive tax capital account balance.
The future liquidity of the Partnership will be influenced by, among other
factors, prospective market conditions, technological changes, the ability of
EFG to manage and remarket the Partnership's assets, and many other events and
circumstances, that could enhance or detract from individual asset yields and
the collective performance of the Partnership's equipment portfolio. However,
the outcome of the Class Action Lawsuit described in Note 6 to the accompanying
financial statements will be the principal factor in determining the future of
the Partnership's operations.
15
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10-Q
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Response:
Refer to Note 6 to the financial statements herein.
Item 2. Changes in Securities
Response: None
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
Response: None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Response: None
Item 5. Other Information
Response: None
Item 6(a). Exhibits
Response: None
Item 6(b). Reports on Form 8-K
Response: None
16
SIGNATURE PAGE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below on behalf of the registrant and in the capacity and
on the date indicated.
AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-D LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By: AFG Leasing IV Incorporated, a Massachusetts
corporation and the General Partner of the
Registrant.
By: /s/ Michael J. Butterfield
--------------------------------------------
Michael J. Butterfield
Treasurer of AFG Leasing IV Incorporated
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: May 14, 1999
--------------------------------------------
By: /s/ Gary Romano
--------------------------------------------
Gary M. Romano
Clerk of AFG Leasing IV Incorporated
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Financial Officer)
Date: May 14, 1999
--------------------------------------------
17