MICHAEL A. LITTMAN
                                 Attorney at Law
                                7609 Ralston Road
                                Arvada, CO 80002
                       (303) 422-8127 * Fax (303) 431-1567
                                malattyco@aol.com



                                  May 13, 2015



Securities and Exchange Commission
Attn: Karina V. Dorin
Division of Corporation Finance Mail Stop 3561
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE: T-REX OIL, INC.
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CURRENT REPORT ON FORM 8-K12G3
FILED MARCH 13, 2015
FILE NO. 0-51425

Dear Ms. Dorin:

We received your comment letter to Amendment No. 1, therefore, we are submitting
this letter in  response.  Amendment  No. 2 to Form 8K12g3 has been filed on the
EDGAR system in which we have made edits in response to comments number 1-3.


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CURRENT REPORT ON FORM 8-K12G3 FILED MARCH 13, 2015
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS PROPERTIES AND PROJECTS, PAGE 6
---------------------------------------------------------------

DEVELOPED AND UNDEVELOPED ACREAGE, PAGE 6
-----------------------------------------

         1. We note your response to prior comment 5 in our letter dated January
22, 2015, including the revised acreage figures for Burke Ranch, relating to the
presentation of the total gross developed and undeveloped acreage.  However, the
14,484.17 acre figure disclosed as the total gross undeveloped acreage on page 6
of Amendment No. 1 does not appear to represent a mathematical  summation of the
individual  line item  entries in the table  which  would  result in a figure of
10,484.17 acres. We also note the expanded  disclosure on page 8 relating to the
Burke Ranch Unit indicates there are 1,467.64 gross acres inside the Unit and an
additional 2,917.02 gross acres outside the Unit. These figures do not appear to
correlate with the total acreage figure of 4,821.88 gross acres provided on page
8 or the mathematical  summation of the 1,467.64 gross developed and 2,237 gross
undeveloped  acres  provided  on page 6 for the Burke  Ranch.  Please  advise or
revise your disclosure regarding the inconsistency in your figures.

ANSWER:  WE HAVE CORRECTED AND AMENDED PAGES 6 THROUGH 8.

         2. The  expanded  disclosure  provided  on page 8 relating to the Burke
Ranch Unit indicates the 1,467.64 gross acres  disclosed  elsewhere on page 6 as
developed acreage are held by production ("HBP").



         The  guidance  in  Item  1208(c)(4)  of  Regulation  S-K,  states  that
undeveloped acreage  "encompasses those lease acres on which wells have not been
drilled or  completed to a point that would  permit the  production  of economic
quantities  of oil or gas  regardless  of whether such acreage  contains  proved
reserves." Therefore,  acreage attributable to existing wells that require major
expenditures  before  production  of  economic  quantities  of oil  or  gas  may
commence, should be reported as undeveloped acreage.

         Any  acreage on which  wells have not been  drilled or  completed  to a
point that would permit the production of economic quantities of oil or gas, but
that is otherwise  held by  production,  would also be deemed to be  undeveloped
acreage pursuant to this guidance.

         Given the foregoing,  please advise or revise the tabular  presentation
of developed and undeveloped acreage on page 6 to resolve inconsistencies in the
classification  of acreage in the Burke Ranch Unit to conform to Item 1208(b) of
Regulation S-K.

ANSWER:  WE HAVE REVISED THE TABLES AND DISCLOSURES ON PAGES 6 THROUGH 7.

PRODUCTIVE WELLS, PAGE 6
------------------------

         3. We have read your response to prior  comment 7 indicating  there are
no productive  natural gas wells attributable to the Company's working interests
in Cole Creek and the revisions to the tabular disclosure on page 6 of Amendment
No. 1 to remove the disclosure of such wells.

         We also note that you  previously  disclosed  that the  Company did not
have any productive oil wells.  However, the tabular disclosure provided on page
6 of  Amendment  No. 1 has been  revised  to  indicate  there  are  seven  gross
productive oil wells, 5 gross (5 net)  productive oil wells in Burke Ranch and 2
gross (0.65 net) productive oil wells in Sioux County,  Nebraska. Other than the
reference  to one oil well that  produces  intermittently  in the Sioux  County,
Nebraska area, the  disclosures  provided on pages 7 and 8 relating to the Sioux
County,  Nebraska  area and the Burke Ranch Unit do not refer to any  productive
oil wells as of December 31, 2014. We also note the disclosure elsewhere on page
6 that you did not have  any oil  production  or  sales  during  the year  ended
December  31, 2014 and on page 5 that the  Company  does not have any proved oil
reserves as of December 31, 2014.

         The  guidance  in  Item  1208(c)(3)  of  Regulation  S-K,  states  that
productive  wells "include  producing  wells and wells  mechanically  capable of
production."  Please tell us why each of the seven  wells meets the  requirement
for disclosure as productive wells. To the extent that any of the seven wells do
not meet this  guidance,  please  revise your  disclosure  of  productive  wells
accordingly.

ANSWER:  IN  RESPONSE  WE HAVE  REVISED THE TABLES TO CORRECT AND HAVE ADDED THE
NOTE ON PAGES 6 THROUGH 8.


We hope these amendments meet with your approval.

Sincerely,

/s/ Michael A. Littman
Michael A. Littman