================================================================================
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended: March 31, 2003
Commission file number: 1-15569
SEMOTUS SOLUTIONS, INC.
(Exact name or Registrant as specified in its Charter)
Nevada 36-3574355
- ---------------------------- -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
16400 Lark Ave., Suite 230, Los Gatos, CA 95032
-----------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(408) 358-7100
--------------
(Registrant's telephone number)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_].
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [_] No [X]
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant, based on the closing price of the registrant's Common Stock on
September 30, 2002 as reported by Amex ($0.14 per share), was approximately
$2,394,980. The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the registrant, based on the closing price of the registrant's Common Stock on
June 19, 2003 as reported by Amex ($0.40 per share), was approximately
$7,837,732. Shares of voting stock held by each officer and director and by each
person who owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting stock have been excluded in
that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of
affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other
purposes.
As of June 19, 2003, 20,594,330 shares of the registrant's Common Stock were
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
The Proxy Statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be
filed with the Commission within 120 days after the close of the fiscal year, is
incorporated by reference into Part III.
================================================================================
SEMOTUS SOLUTIONS, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2003
INDEX
Page
----
PART I
Item 1 Business 2
Item 2 Properties 15
Item 3 Legal Proceedings 15
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 15
PART II
Item 5 Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters 15
Item 6 Selected Consolidated Financial Data 16
Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations 17
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 27
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 27
Item 9 Change in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure 27
PART III
Item 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 28
Item 11 Executive Compensation 28
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 28
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 28
Item 14 Controls and Procedures 28
PART IV
Item 15 Principal Accountant Fees and Services 28
Item 16 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K 28
SIGNATURES 64
CERTIFICATIONS 69
THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT THAT ARE NOT
PURELY HISTORICAL ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION
27A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND SECTION 21E OF THE SECURITIES
ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. WHEN USED HEREIN, WORDS SUCH AS "ANTICIPATE",
"BELIEVE", "ESTIMATE", "INTEND", "MAY", "WILL", "CONTINUE" AND "EXPECT" AND
SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS AS THEY RELATE TO SEMOTUS SOLUTIONS, INC. (SEMOTUS OR THE
COMPANY) OR ITS MANAGEMENT ARE INTENDED TO IDENTIFY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS. THE COMPANY'S ACTUAL RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS COULD
DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THE RESULTS EXPRESSED IN, OR IMPLIED BY, THESE
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO SUCH
DIFFERENCES INCLUDE THOSE DISCUSSED IN MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND BUSINESS. SEMOTUS UNDERTAKES
NO OBLIGATION TO UPDATE OR REVISE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, WHETHER AS A
RESULT OF NEW INFORMATION, FUTURE EVENTS OR OTHERWISE.
1
PART 1
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
OVERVIEW AND FORMATION OF THE COMPANY
Semotus(R) is a leading provider of software for wireless enterprise
applications. Our software connects employees to critical business systems,
information, and processes. Semotus helps mobile employees make better and
faster decisions, increase customer satisfaction, and improve efficiencies in
their business processes for shorter sales and service cycles. Our products
serve such vertical markets as enterprise wireless communications and financial
services. Semotus' enterprise application software provides mobility,
convenience, and efficiency and improves profitability.
Semotus changed its name from Datalink.net, Inc. as of January 11, 2001. The
Company, originally Datalink Systems Corporation, was formed under the laws of
the State of Nevada on June 18, 1996. On June 27, 1996, the Company went public
through an acquisition of a public corporation, Datalink Communications
Corporation ("DCC"), which was previously Lord Abbott, Inc., a Colorado
corporation formed in 1986. As a part of the transaction, the Company also
acquired a Canadian corporation, DSC Datalink Systems Corporation, incorporated
in Vancouver, British Columbia, now named Semotus Systems Corp.
COMPANY INTERNET SITE AND AVAILABILITY OF SEC FILINGS. Our corporate Internet
site is www.semotus.com. We make available on that site our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, as well
as any amendments to those filings, and other filings we make electronically
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The filings can be found in
the Investor Relations section of our site, and are available free of charge. In
addition to our web site, the SEC maintains an Internet site at www.sec.gov that
contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding us and other issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
Information on our Internet site is not part of this Form 10-K.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
SALE AND DISCONTINUATION OF OPERATIONS
As part of our Centralization and Consolidation Plan (See "Centralization and
Consolidation Plan"), Semotus reduced its e-commerce and m-commerce presence
with the elimination of unprofitable products and services in that segment. One
of our subsidiaries, Five Star Advantage, Inc. (Five Star), was not expected to
make a significant contribution to the Company's future profitability as its
operations were unprofitable. Therefore, Semotus decided to close the facilities
and cease the operations of Five Star as of the end of June 2002. Furthermore,
Five Star filed for liquidation under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on
June 28, 2002. In continuing with a reduced e-commerce and m-commerce presence
and the elimination of unprofitable products and services, Semotus decided to
also discontinue the operations of Wares on the Web, Inc. (Wares), another
Semotus subsidiary, in August of 2002. The Wares operations were unprofitable.
Furthermore, Wares filed for liquidation under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code on August 19, 2002. The Final Decree in the Wares bankruptcy case was filed
by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court on March 24, 2003 and the bankruptcy case was
closed at that time.
Application Design Associates, Inc. (ADA), largely comprising our logistic
systems segment, was sold on May 6, 2003 as part of the original investment and
option agreement with Global Beverage Group (GBG). In January 2002, GBG became a
49% shareholder in ADA, and GBG has now exercised its option to purchase the
remaining 51% of ADA from Semotus. (See "Significant Events").
In accordance with FAS 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets", the operations of Five Star, Wares and ADA have been
recorded as discontinued operations in the year-end period ended March 31, 2003.
For comparison purposes, the operations have also been classified as
discontinued for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2001 and 2002. Five Star was
part of the Enterprise and Commerce Sales segment. The disposal of its assets
and liabilities is now under the control of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. Wares was
also a part of the Enterprise and Commerce Sales segment. The disposal of its
assets and liabilities was also under the control of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court,
which closed the bankruptcy case on March 24, 2003. A net loss from discontinued
operations for Five Star and Wares of $122,021 was recorded at March 31, 2003.
Further, a net gain on disposition of $128,582 was recorded at March 31, 2003
for the final disposal of the assets and liabilities of both Five Star and
Wares. ADA's operations have also been recorded as discontinued in the year
ended March 31, 2003. ADA made up the logistic systems segment. A loss from
discontinued operations of $$677,069 was recorded for ADA as of March 31, 2003,
mostly comprised of an impairment to goodwill of $635,724. Management performed
the impairment tests as described in Note 6, "Impairment of Long Lived Assets
and Goodwill" and as defined in SFAS 144 and SFAS 142 to determine the
impairment expense.
CENTRALIZATION AND CONSOLIDATION PLAN
During fiscal year 2003, we determined that the economy would continue in a weak
recovery and that the market for technology products would stay anemic.
Accordingly, the Company has continued to centralize and consolidate its
organization and its operations.
2
The headcount has been reduced 50% from March 31, 2002 and as a result,
engineering, sales and marketing and administrative costs have been further
reduced and centralized. The overall Semotus organization has eliminated
redundant positions and functions while improving the sales effort through
utilizing existing customer relationships to shorten the sales cycle.
Semotus has organized its operations around two core lines of business, while
maintaining but de-emphasizing its other operations: i) financial services with
the Global Market Pro, Equity Market Pro and Futures Market Pro products and
services and ii) workforce automation with the HipLinkXS family of products and
services. These products maintain high gross and operating margins and form the
core of the enterprise software marketing strategy with wireless and mobile
features available in the software.
As for our other segments, professional services and the enterprise and commerce
segment, most of the operations have been discontinued (Five Star, Wares On The
Web and ADA), while others have been further consolidated and reduced through
the elimination of unprofitable contracts and services. In professional
services, Simkin's Kinetidex 2.0 product was sold to the joint developer and
exclusive distributor of the product, Micromedex, Inc. Wireless medical software
products have been slow to penetrate the market and therefore have been
eliminated by Semotus. Simkin maintains small amounts of business through
continuing software training and some replacement software sales.
M-commerce initiatives have been significantly reduced. The e-commerce economy
has contracted and m-commerce is not expected to make a significant contribution
in the market in the near future. Consequently, Semotus has reduced its
e-commerce and m-commerce business with the closures of Five Star and Wares, and
the reduction of other unprofitable products and services in that segment. At
WizShop, the operations have been largely consolidated into Semotus' other
divisions and subsidiaries. At the end of June, 2002, Five Star's operations
were closed as the market for e-fulfillment is currently unprofitable. In August
of 2002, Wares' operations were closed. So, while Semotus maintains a reduced
m-commerce and e-commerce presence, it has de-emphasized the e-fulfillment
portion of that business. (See "Significant Events".)
SIGNIFICANT EVENTS
In May 2002, the Board of Directors of Semotus determined that the Company
needed to focus its operations on its core enterprise software products (See
"Centralization and Consolidation Plan"). Given the continued economic recession
and limited capital spending, as well as the reduced access to capital, the
Company must economically utilize its limited resources towards those products
with the best margins and cash flow generation. As part of that effort, Semotus
reduced its e-commerce operations, closed the Five Star business as of the end
of June 2002 and closed the Wares' business in August 2002. While maintaining a
reduced m-commerce and e-commerce presence, Semotus has de-emphasized the
e-fulfillment portion of that business as the e-fulfillment markets have
declined dramatically over the past year and are not expected to recover
significantly in the near future. Additionally, the remaining 51% of ADA that
Semotus owned during the fiscal year was purchased by GBG on May 6, 2003.
Accordingly, Semotus has redirected its human and capital resources towards more
profitable products and services.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Except for the historical information contained herein, this report contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company's
actual results could differ materially from those discussed herein. Factors that
could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to,
those discussed in this section under "Description of Business", "Recent
Acquisitions" and "Risk Factors" as well as in the section entitled
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations."
THE SEMOTUS STRATEGY
Semotus focuses its enterprise application software strategy in target markets
where there are significant growth opportunities and an existing strong customer
base that is adopting mobile and wireless technology. Customer penetration and
product acceptance are paramount to the Semotus formula. While the Company
continues to improve and maintain its market leading technology, Semotus molds
its products for market acceptance. Through strong customer relationships and
market knowledge, Semotus blends its technology into readily identifiable and
sellable products and services.
TARGET MARKETS
Enterprises are adopting mobile and wireless software solutions in order to
increase their employees' productivity and customer satisfaction. Semotus'
technology can service any enterprise in any market segment; however, the
Company has chosen to focus in two areas that the Company believes project the
greatest amount of growth potential and the strongest need for mobile and
wireless solutions. Those two lines of business are: (i) wireless financial
services with the Global Market Pro, Equity Market Pro and Futures Market Pro
software and services, and ii)enterprise wireless messaging and communications
with the HipLinkXS family of software and services.
3
WIRELESS FINANCIAL SERVICES: Mobile and wireless software services, handheld
devices, and financial management applications are now standard on the floors of
stock exchanges. Wireless data delivery can put the individual traders one step
ahead of the market, increasing their transaction time and giving them a
competitive advantage. It is for this reason that Semotus developed Global
Market Pro with J.P. Morgan Chase in 1999. Global Market Pro is an advanced
wireless application designed specifically for traders and financial
professionals in the global capital, derivative and foreign exchange markets.
Equity Market Pro was developed from the GMP platform and is designed for equity
traders and salesmen who have a real-time need for equity market information. A
new product, Futures Market Pro, was also developed from the GMP platform and is
designed for futures traders and other people who have a real-time need for
futures market information. Equity Market Pro and Futures Market Pro services
are marketed to major financial institutions, similar to Global Market Pro.
These applications provide the flexibility for a user to request additional
information or change requirements and set-up at any time from the Internet or
the user's wireless device.
ENTERPRISE WIRELESS MESSAGING AND COMMUNICATIONS: HipLinkXS has evolved from an
enterprise text messaging application into a complete mobile communications
solution. HipLinkXS consists of a suite of powerful messaging products that
provide real-time wireless text and voice messaging and paging capabilities.
This family of software applications enables corporations and individuals to
send messages to a large mobile field force, through network management software
for sales force automation, or a database management application. Semotus
addresses the needs of enterprises with large numbers of employees in the field
by providing complete solutions that assist field service organizations with
routing and dispatching, communications, order status, access to corporate
databases and customer billing. By having remote access to technical
information, inventory status and corporate databases, the field service
worker's productivity increases. Therefore mobile and wireless software
solutions are becoming a critical component of many enterprises today.
SERVICES AND PRODUCTS
During this fiscal year, Semotus determined to centralize and consolidate its
operations into the enterprise application software business. In fiscal year
2003, Semotus offered its services and products through its two major lines of
business within the enterprise application software market: (i) wireless
financial services and software, and (ii) wireless messaging and communications
software. (See "Centralization and Consolidation Plan").
ENTERPRISE APPLICATION SOFTWARE
Enterprise application software connects employees to critical business systems,
information, and processes. It helps mobile employees make better and faster
decisions, increase customer satisfaction, and improve efficiencies in their
business processes for shorter sales and service cycles through the immediate
access to mission critical information in a mobile environment. The Company
creates mobile and wireless information products by customizing and delivering
actionable and time sensitive information whenever that information is most
valuable to the customer. Services and applications are device agnostic and
protocol independent, integrating seamlessly into every enterprise
infrastructure and working with every wireless carrier and all text messaging
devices. Semotus provides two different wireless solutions: (i) ASP-based, where
Semotus hosts and manages the information on its servers and (ii) premise based
where Semotus installs and engineers the software and information on the
customers' servers.
GLOBAL MARKET PRO(TM)
Global Market Pro, is a wireless application designed for traders and financial
professionals in the global capital, derivative and foreign exchange markets.
Semotus developed Global Market Pro in cooperation with J.P. Morgan Chase
Manhattan Bank's Global Markets Data Division in 1999. The application is being
marketed to the trading and professional finance industry, where it is highly
adaptable to a variety of wireless platforms. In addition, Global Market Pro is
capable of advanced customization based on the unique preferences of each
individual.
Global Market Pro provides real-time financial data from leading news and
information sources, including Reuters, Market News International and GovPX.
This product has been engineered for all device platforms including, RIM
Interactive 957, two-way pagers, WAP phones and the Palm VII. The application
features a portfolio customization Web site interface, allowing users to set
event or time driven push alerts based on specific criteria or establish custom
portfolios for real-time on-demand data requests. Semotus is continuing to
expand the product's features and capabilities.
EQUITY MARKET PRO(TM)
Equity Market Pro is an enterprise application built for the institutional
equity trader using the Global Market Pro financial platform; Semotus developed
EMPro with the same customization capability and is deploying EMPro using its
new over-the-air-programming technology (OTAP). Equity Market Pro is designed
for the secure delivery of real-time financial information and news. EMPro
features Dow Jones News Service(SM) as its premier news source. Market data for
EMPro is sourced from Reuters and GovPX.
Equity Market Pro is targeted to the over 400,000 Institutional professionals
who use real-time equity data at a workstation and will be
4
sold to institutions for their employees. All data provided through EMPro is
completely customizable providing information specific to each trader's needs.
Features included the ability to create and track an unlimited number of watch
lists for either push or pull delivery, snap quotes, charts and graphs,
corporate profiles, symbol lookup, indices, and world composite data. EMPro
monitors any security or market indicator in real-time and sends out a wireless
alert when pre-set values have been reached.
FUTURES MARKET PRO(TM)
Futures Market Pro is a dynamic wireless financial application that gives
financial professionals instant access to real-time futures and equities data.
FMPro, like Equity Market Pro and Global Market Pro, can be customized to
individual information needs. FMPro monitors the market for events on any
contract or stock, create and track custom watch lists. Alerts can be set on
futures, securities or indices so that a user is notified when the market moves.
Other features include snap quotes, time and sales info, watch lists, charts,
news from Dow Jones and Comtex, built in portfolios, customized alerts,
corporate profiles, symbol lookup and an OTAP application loader.
HIPLINKXS(TM) FAMILY
As part of its expanding enterprise application technology and product
offerings, Semotus launched a newly upgraded Hiplink product called HipLinkXS in
July of 2001. HipLinkXS has developed into a suite of powerful messaging
products that provide real-time wireless text and voice messaging and paging
capabilities. This family of software applications enables corporations and
individuals to send messages to a large mobile field force, through network
management software for sales force automation, or a database management
application. Some examples of applications that HipLinkXS can easily integrate
with, working as the critical event notification component, include: NetIQ
AppManager, Remedy ARS, HP OpenView, Tivoli Enterprise Console, Tivoli NetView,
CA Paradigm Service Desk, CA Unicenter, ISS Real Secure, and many more.
HipLinkXS products also have sophisticated voice and two-way messaging
capabilities that can turn a wireless device literally into a remote control,
allowing the user access to the designated computer network anytime, anywhere.
Users can send messages and request a response back from the receiver, with the
ability to trigger server processes based on the response from the two-way
device. HipLinkXS supports virtually any wireless device for secure, reliable,
two-way communications via a single integration point, providing turnkey access
to wireless carriers around the world.
The HipLink solution supports both UNIX and NT and is scalable and configurable
to the specific requirements of the enterprise customer. The software functions
in the mission critical environment of enterprise messaging including wireless
applications for network management messaging and monitoring, field work force
communications, help desk operations and Internet messaging and monitoring.
Currently, the HipLinkXS Family of products includes: HipLinkXS Desktop
Messaging; HipLinkXS Application Messaging; RemLinkXS; IQLinkXS; OpenLinkXS;
QuickLinkXS.
LEGACY FINANCIAL CONSUMER PRODUCTS
Semotus continues to offer a suite of wireless financial consumer products.
These products allow customers to retrieve customized information from real-time
data feeds, receive and send messages and other information, as well as set
their own parameters for real-time data they wish to receive. Semotus' current
line of financial consumer products is mostly comprised of QuoteXpress(R),
CompanyNewsX and CommodityXpress(TM).
ENTERPRISE AND COMMERCE SALES
Semotus' enterprise and commerce line of business provides online transactional
information and sales of products and services. The online services include web
site development and maintenance, sales, marketing, customer retention programs
and services, logistics, distribution, and tracking and reporting. In essence,
Semotus can take care of all of a customer's online requirements from building a
web presence to sales of products to collections and cash management. Semotus
uses the enterprise and commerce business to add-on wireless products such as
alerts to wireless devices, comparative data information and real time
messaging.
In May 2002, the Board of Directors of Semotus determined that the Company
needed to focus its operations on its core enterprise software products. (See
"Centralization and Consolidation Plan"). Given the continued economic recession
and limited capital spending, as well as the reduced access to capital, the
Company must economically utilize its limited resources towards those products
with the best margins and cash flow generation. As part of that effort, Semotus
reduced its e-commerce operations by closing the Five Star business as of the
end of June 2002 and the Wares' business in August 2002. While maintaining a
reduced m-commerce and e-commerce presence, Semotus has de-emphasized the
e-fulfillment portion of that business as the e-fulfillment markets have
declined dramatically over the past year and are not expected to recover
significantly in the near future. Accordingly, Semotus is redirecting its human
and capital resources towards more profitable products and services within the
enterprise application software business.
5
PROFESSIONAL AND RELATED SERVICES
Semotus' professional service line of business provides customers with online
and wireless information and operations consulting, software engineering, and
training. This line of business provides the software tools and management to
install and efficiently run online and wireless operations. Semotus sold
Simkin's Kinetidex 2.0 product to the joint developer and exclusive distributor
of the product, Micromedex, Inc. Wireless medical software products have been
slow to penetrate the market and therefore have been eliminated by Semotus.
Simkin maintains modest amounts of business through continuing software training
and some replacement software sales. Additionally, the Wares' business was
closed in August 2002.
Profitable services and applications are being continued through the two core
lines of business within the enterprise application software segment, consisting
of financial services and workforce automation.
LOGISTIC SYSTEMS
Through Semotus' ADA subsidiary, the Company created proprietary software and
integrated it with other hardware and software products to produce a complete
logistical solution for automation of customer call centers, dispatching,
equipment deployment, servicing and invoicing, while interfacing to existing
corporate business functions and existing ERP solutions. As part of the system
integration function, ADA resells HipLink software and services among other
mobile products. ADA's largest customers are in the soft drink beverage
industry.
In May of 2003, GBG, a 49% shareholder in ADA, purchased the remaining 51% of
ADA. Therefore, these operations were discontinued. (See "Discontinuation of
Operations"). Profitable services and applications are being continued through
the two core lines of business within the enterprise application software
market, consisting of financial services and workforce automation.
STRATEGIC RELATIONSHIPS
Semotus maintains strategic relationships with wireless and technology companies
in order to further develop its services and product offerings. Maintaining
market-leading technology is a difficult task; however, Semotus believes that it
continues to produce new software and engineered products that are leading the
mobile and wireless market. The key relationships for Semotus are with carriers,
device manufacturers and content providers.
CUSTOMERS
Semotus has a very diversified customer list. Although Semotus has many
customers utilizing its mobile and wireless services, the broadly diversified
base means there is no significant concentration in any industry. In the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2003, there were two customers accounting for over 5% of
the Company's revenues. One customer in the wireless services segment accounted
for 17% of revenues, and a second customer in the wireless services segment
accounted for 6% of revenues. None of these customers account for any
significant accounts receivable at March 31, 2003.
VENDORS
Semotus maintains strong relationships with all of the major telecommunications
carriers, content providers and hardware manufacturers for its wireless and
e-commerce products and services. The Company is not dependent upon any one
carrier, content provider or hardware manufacturer for its business, nor is its
business affected by any of the current financial problems experienced by
certain telecommunication equipment and service providers.
COMPETITION
Semotus is participating in the highly competitive businesses of enterprise
application software, mobile and wireless telecommunications, systems
integration and professional services. The competition is from a broad range of
both large and small domestic and international corporations. Some of the
Company's competitors have far greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than the Company.
The competitive factors important to Semotus are its technology, its engineering
expertise, its customer support and its customer relationships. Business segment
and industry competitive factors include, but are not limited to, technology,
engineering capability, customer support, breadth and depth of strategic
relationships, financial condition, and marketing initiatives. The Company
leverages the quality of its engineering team and its customer service team, the
depth and breadth of its customer relationships, and its ability to respond
quickly to change in order to be competitive and successful.
6
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Semotus maintains its research and development operations in Vancouver, B.C. As
of March 31, 2003, Semotus employed 9 personnel in research and development and
engineering. The Company finds it advantageous to have its research and
development activities in Vancouver due to the abundance of available,
affordable and talented software engineers. Total costs incurred in research and
development amounted to $719,965, $1,010,720 and $1,187,348 respectively, in the
years ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Our success depends significantly upon our technology. To protect our rights, we
rely on a combination of copyright and trademark laws, patents, trade secrets,
confidentiality agreements with employees and third parties and protective
contractual provisions. Most of our employees have executed confidentiality and
non-use agreements that transfer any rights they may have in copyrightable works
or patentable technologies to us. In addition, prior to entering into
discussions with potential business partners or customers regarding our business
and technologies, we generally require that such parties enter into
nondisclosure agreements with us. If these discussions result in a license or
other business relationship, we also generally require that the agreement
setting forth the parties' respective rights and obligations include provisions
for the protection of our intellectual property rights. For example, the
standard language in our agreements provides that we retain ownership of all
patents and copyrights in our technologies and requires our customers to display
our copyright and trademark notices.
"Semotus", "QuoteXpress", "MailXpress", "Net2Wireless" and "Simkin" are
registered trademarks of ours. In addition, we have applied for federal
registration of other marks. However, we may not be successful in obtaining the
service marks and trademarks for which we have applied.
The Company has a total of nine issued patents as of March 31 2003, as follows:
Interactive Two-Way Pager System #5,838,252 and Divisional Case #6,049,291;
Pager Enhanced Keyboard and system #5,964,833 and Divisional Case #6,085,232;
System and Method for a Real-Time Data Stream Analyzer and Alert System
#5,872,921; Virtual Transcription System #5,875,436; Mail Alert System
#6,035,104; Alphanumeric Paging Message System Operating on the Internet
#6,040,784 and Divisional Case #6,515,576. Semotus also has 6 patents pending.
We anticipate on-going patent application activity in the future. However,
patents with respect to our technology may not be granted, and, if granted,
patents may be challenged or invalidated. In addition, issued patents may not
provide us with any competitive advantages and may be challenged by third
parties.
Despite our efforts to protect our rights, unauthorized parties may copy aspects
of our products or services or obtain and use information that we regard as
proprietary. The laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary
rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States. In addition,
others could possibly independently develop substantially equivalent
intellectual property. If we do not effectively protect our intellectual
property, our business could suffer.
Companies in the software and application services and wireless industries have
frequently resorted to litigation regarding intellectual property rights. We may
have to litigate to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our
trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of others' proprietary
rights. From time to time, we have received, and may receive in the future,
notice of claims of infringement of others' proprietary rights. Any such claims
could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, divert management's
attention, cause product or service release delays, require us to redesign our
products or services or require us to enter into royalty or licensing
agreements. If a successful claim of infringement were made against us and we
could not develop non-infringing technology or license the infringed or similar
technology on a timely and cost-effective basis, our business could suffer.
EMPLOYEES
At March 31, 2003, without ADA, we had 22 full-time employees and 3 part-time
employees, approximately 10 of who were engaged in sales and marketing, 6 in
finance and administration, and 9 in engineering. No employees of the Company
are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. At March 31, 2003, ADA had 8
employees.
RISK FACTORS
Our business and the results of our operations are affected by a variety of risk
factors, including those described below.
RISKS PARTICULAR TO SEMOTUS
WE HAVE HISTORICALLY INCURRED LOSSES AND THESE LOSSES ARE EXPECTED TO CONTINUE
IN THE FUTURE.
We recorded a net loss for each year since our current business started in 1996
through our fiscal year ended March 31, 2003. As of March 31, 2003, we had an
accumulated deficit of $62,861,789.
7
We have not achieved profitability and we expect to continue to incur operating
losses in the future. These losses may be higher than our current losses from
operations. Many of our operating expenses are fixed in the short term. We have
(and may in the future) incurred losses from the impairment of goodwill or other
intangible assets, or from the impairment of the value of private companies that
we acquired. We must therefore generate revenues sufficient to offset these
expenses in order for us to become profitable. If we do achieve profitability,
we may not be able to sustain it.
Because we expect to continue to incur significant sales and marketing, systems
development and administrative expenses, we will need to generate significant
revenue to become profitable and sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual
basis. We may not achieve or sustain our revenue or profit goals and our losses
may continue or grow in the future. As a result, we may not be able to increase
revenue or achieve profitability on a quarterly or annual basis.
OUR FUTURE REVENUES AND OPERATING RESULTS ARE DEPENDENT TO A LARGE EXTENT UPON
GENERAL ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, CONDITIONS IN THE WIRELESS SERVICES MARKET AND
CONDITIONS IN OUR PRIMARY TARGET MARKETS.
Our future revenues and operating results are dependent to a large extent upon
general economic conditions, conditions in the wireless market and within that
market, our primary target markets of financial services and field and
automation services. Economic activity continues to be slow in these markets,
our sales cycle are still lengthened significantly as existing and potential
customers continue to reduce their spending commitments, deferring wireless
projects and reducing their willingness to make investments in new wireless
services. Moreover, adoption of wireless services has not proceeded as rapidly
as previously anticipated. If general economic conditions continue to be
adverse, if the economies in which our target customers are located continue to
suffer from a recession, if demand for our solutions does not expand, or if war
or terrorism impacts the U.S., Canada or our other target markets, our ability
to increase our customer base may be limited, and our revenue may decrease
further.
OUR ACQUISITIONS MAY NOT DELIVER THE VALUE WE PAID OR WILL PAY FOR THEM.
Excessive expenses may result if we do not successfully integrate our
acquisitions, or if the costs and management resources we expend in connection
with the integrations exceed our expectations. We expect that our acquisitions
and any acquisitions we may pursue in the future will have a continuing,
significant impact on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Additionally, we cannot guarantee that we will realize the benefits or strategic
objectives we are seeking to obtain by acquiring these companies. The value of
the companies that we acquired may be less than the amount we paid if there is:
- - a decline of their position in the respective markets they serve; or
- - a decline in general of the markets they serve.
Our financial results may be adversely affected if:
- - we fail to assimilate the acquired assets with our pre-existing business;
- - we lose key employees of these companies or of Semotus as a result of the
acquisitions;
- - our management's attention is diverted by other business concerns; or
- - we assume unanticipated liabilities related to the acquired assets.
At March 31, 2003, we recorded a net gain from the disposition of Five Star and
Wares of $128,582.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO RECOVER ANY OF THE VALUE OF GOODWILL RECORDED ON SOME OF
OUR ACQUISITIONS AND INVESTMENTS.
During 2002 and 2001, we recorded approximately $9,695,199 in goodwill and other
intangibles related to our acquisitions. Consideration for our acquisitions was
partially or fully funded through the issuance of shares of our common stock at
a time when our stock price was at historically high prices. All of these
companies were privately held and their fair values are highly subjective and
not readily determinable. Our policy is to review the value of all our
acquisitions for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount may not be recoverable. At the time of our acquisitions and
investments, market valuations and the availability of capital for such
companies were at historically high levels. During the year ended March 31,
2003, stock prices and market valuations in our industry and in our vertical
markets have fallen substantially in response to a variety of factors, including
a general downturn in the economy, terrorism, a curtailment in the availability
of capital and a general reduction in technology expenditures. The market
valuations of those companies in which we have invested and of other companies
similar to
8
those we acquired have declined substantially. For the year ended March 31,
2003, we did not record any impairment charges from continuing operations.
However, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 we recorded $3,617,283 in
goodwill impairment charges and $3,420,000 in other intellectual property
impairments charges. If similar adverse market conditions develop in the future,
we may be required to take additional impairment charges. Further, in accordance
with SFAS 144, Semotus has presented the operations of FiveStar, Wares and ADA
as discontinued operations. In the net loss from discontinued operations for
2002 and 2003, impairment charges were taken against the goodwill of both Wares
(fiscal year 2002) and ADA (fiscal year2003). As discussed in Note 6,
"Impairment of Long Lived Assets and Goodwill," Semotus performed the impairment
tests and determined that impairment charges were required. The impairment
expense for the Wares goodwill was $1,156,587 and for the ADA goodwill was
$635,724.
OUR FUTURE EARNINGS COULD CONTINUE TO BE NEGATIVELY IMPACTED BY SIGNIFICANT
CHARGES RESULTING FROM THE IMPAIRMENT IN THE VALUE OF ACQUIRED ASSETS
For acquisitions which we have accounted for using the purchase method, we
regularly evaluate the recorded amount of long-lived assets, consisting
primarily of goodwill, acquired contracts and core technology, to determine
whether there has been any impairment of the value of the assets and the
appropriateness of their estimated remaining lives. We evaluate impairment
whenever events or changed circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
the long-lived assets might not be recoverable. At March 31, 2002, we recorded
an impairment charge of $3,420,000 related to intellectual property assets, and
$3,617,283 related to goodwill. Further, in accordance with SFAS 144, Semotus
has presented the operations of Five Star, Wares and ADA as discontinued
operations. In the net loss from discontinued operations for 2002 and 2003,
impairment charges were taken against the goodwill of both Wares (fiscal year
2002) and ADA (fiscal year2003). As discussed in Note 6, "Impairment of Long
Lived Assets and Goodwill," Semotus performed the impairment tests and
determined that impairment charges were required. The impairment expense for the
Wares goodwill was $1,156,587 and for the ADA goodwill was $635,724.
In addition, recent changes in GAAP require us to discontinue amortizing
goodwill and certain intangible assets. We adopted these changes effective April
1, 2002. Under this approach, goodwill and certain intangible assets will not be
amortized into results of operations, but instead are reviewed for impairment
and written down and charged to results of operations only in the periods in
which the recorded value of goodwill and certain intangible assets is more than
its fair value.
We will continue to regularly evaluate the recorded amount of our long-lived
assets including acquired contracts and core technology and test for impairment.
In the event we determine that any long-lived asset has been impaired, we will
record additional impairment charges in future quarters. Goodwill will be
evaluated at least annually. We are unable to predict the amount, if any, of
potential future impairments.
WE MAY NOT ACHIEVE PROFITABILITY IF WE ARE UNABLE TO MAINTAIN, IMPROVE AND
DEVELOP THE WIRELESS DATA SERVICES WE OFFER.
We believe that our future business prospects depend in part on our ability to
maintain and improve our current services and to develop new ones on a timely
basis. Our services will have to achieve market acceptance, maintain
technological competitiveness and meet an expanding range of customer
requirements. As a result of the complexities inherent in our service offerings,
major new wireless data services and service enhancements require long
development and testing periods. We may experience difficulties that could delay
or prevent the successful development, introduction or marketing of new services
and service enhancements. Additionally, our new services and service
enhancements may not achieve market acceptance. If we cannot effectively
maintain, improve and develop services we may not be able to recover our fixed
costs or otherwise become profitable.
IF WE DO NOT RESPOND EFFECTIVELY AND ON A TIMELY BASIS TO RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL
CHANGE, OUR SERVICES MAY BECOME OBSOLETE AND WE MAY LOSE SALES.
The wireless and data communications industries are characterized by rapidly
changing technologies, industry standards, customer needs and competition, as
well as by frequent new product and service introductions. Our services are
integrated with wireless handheld devices and the computer systems of our
customers. Our services must also be compatible with the data networks of
wireless carriers. We must respond to technological changes affecting both our
customers and suppliers. We may not be successful in developing and marketing,
on a timely and cost-effective basis, new services that respond to technological
changes, evolving industry standards or changing customer requirements. Our
ability to grow and achieve profitability will depend, in part, on our ability
to accomplish all of the following in a timely and cost-effective manner:
- - effectively use and integrate new wireless and data technologies;
- - continue to develop our technical expertise;
- - enhance our wireless data, engineering and system design services;
9
- - develop applications for new wireless networks; and
- - influence and respond to emerging industry standards and other changes.
WE DEPEND UPON WIRELESS NETWORKS OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY OTHERS. IF WE DO NOT
HAVE CONTINUED ACCESS TO SUFFICIENT CAPACITY ON RELIABLE NETWORKS, WE MAY BE
UNABLE TO DELIVER SERVICES AND OUR SALES COULD DECREASE.
Our ability to grow and achieve profitability partly depends on our ability to
buy sufficient capacity on the networks of wireless carriers and on the
reliability and security of their systems. We depend on these companies to
provide uninterrupted and trouble free service and would not be able to satisfy
our customers' needs if they failed to provide the required capacity or needed
level of service. In addition, our expenses would increase and our profitability
could be materially adversely affected if wireless carriers were to increase the
prices of their services.
WE MAY FAIL TO SUPPORT OUR ANTICIPATED EVENTUAL GROWTH IN OPERATIONS WHICH COULD
REDUCE DEMAND FOR OUR SERVICES AND MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR REVENUE.
Our business strategy is based on the assumption that the number of subscribers
to our services, the amount of information they want to receive and the number
of services we offer will all increase. We must continue to develop and expand
our systems and operations to accommodate this growth. The expansion and
adaptation of our customer service and network operations center requires
substantial financial, operational and management resources. We may be unable to
expand our operations for one or more of the following reasons:
- - we may not be able to locate or hire at reasonable compensation rates
qualified engineers and other employees necessary to expand our capacity;
- - we may not be able to obtain the hardware necessary to expand our capacity;
- - we may not be able to expand our customer service, billing and other related
support systems; and
- - we may not be able to obtain sufficient additional capacity from wireless
carriers.
Due to the limited deployment of our services to date, the ability of our
systems and operations to connect and manage a substantially larger number of
customers while maintaining superior performance is unknown. Any failure on our
part to develop and maintain our wireless data services as we experience growth
could significantly reduce demand for our services and materially adversely
affect our revenue. Further, the Company has implemented a Centralization and
Consolidation Plan which may limit growth in the short term.
AS WE IMPLEMENT OUR CENTRALIZATION AND CONSOLIDATION PLAN TO REDUCE OUR
OPERATING EXPENSES, WE MAY FAIL TO SUPPORT OUR OPERATIONS, WHICH COULD REDUCE
DEMAND FOR OUR SERVICES AND MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR REVENUE.
Our business strategy is based on the assumption that the number of subscribers
to our services, the amount of information they want to receive and the number
of services we offer will all increase. We must continue to develop and expand
our systems and operations to accommodate this growth. The expansion and or
maintenance and adaptation of our customer service and network operations
centers require substantial financial, operations and management resources. At
the same time, we have implemented plans to reduce our operating expenses, which
entails a reduction in operational and management resources. While we believe
that our cost reductions are targeted at areas that are not necessary to
maintain and develop our ability to serve customers, there can be no assurance
that we will succeed in lowering costs while maintaining our ability to provide
service. If we fail to maintain or improve service levels, we may lose customers
and/or the opportunity to provide more services and products.
WE DEPEND ON RECRUITING AND RETAINING KEY MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL
WITH WIRELESS DATA AND SOFTWARE EXPERIENCE AND WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO DEVELOP NEW
PRODUCTS OR SUPPORT EXISTING PRODUCTS IF WE CANNOT HIRE OR RETAIN QUALIFIED
EMPLOYEES.
Because of the technical nature of our products and the dynamic market in which
we compete, our performance depends on attracting and retaining key employees.
Competition for qualified personnel in the wireless data and software industries
is intense and finding qualified personnel with experience in both industries is
even more difficult. We believe there are only a limited number of individuals
with the requisite skills in the field of wireless data communication, and it is
becoming increasingly difficult to hire and retain these persons. We have a
written employment agreement with Anthony N. LaPine, the Company's chairman, CEO
and president. We do not have employment agreements with any other officer. The
loss of Mr. LaPine or any other officer may have an adverse effect on our
business and prospects by depriving us of the management services necessary to
operate our business and achieve profitability.
10
IF WE DO NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPITAL TO FUND OUR OPERATIONS, WE MAY BE FORCED TO
DISCONTINUE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT, REDUCE OUR SALES AND MARKETING EFFORTS OR
FOREGO ATTRACTIVE BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES.
To help ensure that we would have sufficient capital to take advantage of our
core business opportunities we have taken significant actions since the first
quarter of this fiscal yea to reduce our operating expenses. Most of our current
operating expenses, such as employee compensation and lease payments for
facilities and equipment, are relatively stable and these expense levels are
based in part on our expectations regarding future revenues. As a result, any
shortfall in our revenues relative to our expectations could cause significant
changes in our operating results from quarter to quarter. If the cost-cutting
actions that we have taken are insufficient, we may not have sufficient capital
to fund our operations, and additional capital may not be available on
acceptable terms, if at all. Any of these outcomes could adversely impact our
ability to respond to competitive pressures or could prevent us from conducting
all or a portion of our planned operations. We may need to undertake additional
measures to reduce our operating expenses in the future.
We expect that the cash we receive through our operations and our cash on hand
will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs for
the next 12 months. After that, we may need to raise additional funds, and
additional financing may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. We
also may require additional capital to acquire or invest in complementary
businesses or products or to obtain the right to use complementary technologies.
If we issue additional equity securities to raise funds, the ownership
percentage of existing shareholders will be reduced. If we incur debt, the debt
will rank senior to our common shares, we will incur debt service costs and we
will likely have to enter into agreements that will restrict our operations in
some respects and our ability to declare dividends to the holders of our common
shares.
OUR PATENTS MAY NOT PROTECT US FROM COMPETITORS.
Costs of prosecuting and defending patent infringement claims could hurt our
business. We currently own a number of patents related to our products, and have
applied for additional patents. We are not certain whether any new patents will
be granted in the future. Even if we receive additional patents, they may not
provide us with protection from competitors. Our failure to obtain patent
protection, or illegal use by others of any patents we have or may obtain could
adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. In
addition, the laws of certain foreign countries do not protect proprietary
rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Claims for damages
resulting from any such infringement may be asserted or prosecuted against us.
The validity of any patents we have or obtain could also be challenged. Any such
claims could be time consuming and costly to defend, diverting management's
attention and our resources.
OUR SALES CYCLE IS LONG, AND OUR STOCK PRICE COULD DECLINE IF SALES ARE DELAYED
OR CANCELLED.
Quarterly fluctuations in our operating performance are exacerbated by the
length of time between our first contact with a business customer and the first
revenue from sales of services to that customer or end users. Because our
services represent a significant investment for our business customers, we spend
a substantial amount of time educating them regarding the use and benefits of
our services and they, in turn, spend a substantial amount of time performing
internal reviews and obtaining capital expenditure approvals before purchasing
our services. As much as a year may elapse between the time we approach a
business customer and the time we begin to deliver services to a customer or end
user. Any delay in sales of our services could cause our quarterly operating
results to vary significantly from projected results, which could cause our
stock price to decline. In addition, we may spend a significant amount of time
and money on a potential customer that ultimately does not purchase our
services.
OUR SOFTWARE MAY CONTAIN DEFECTS OR ERRORS, AND OUR SALES COULD GO DOWN IF THIS
INJURES OUR REPUTATION OR DELAYS SHIPMENTS OR OUR SOFTWARE.
Our software products and platforms are complex and must meet the stringent
technical requirements of our customers. We must develop our services quickly to
keep pace with the rapidly changing software and telecommunications markets.
Software as complex as ours is likely to contain undetected errors or defects,
especially when first introduced or when new versions are released. Our software
may not be free from errors or defects after delivery to customers has begun,
which could result in the rejection of our software or services, damage to our
reputation, lost revenue, diverted development resources and increased service
and warranty costs.
WE MAY BE SUBJECT TO LIABILITY FOR TRANSMITTING INFORMATION, AND OUR INSURANCE
COVERAGE MAY BE INADEQUATE TO PROTECT US FROM THIS LIABILITY.
We may be subject to claims relating to information transmitted over systems we
develop or operate. These claims could take the form of lawsuits for defamation,
negligence, copyright or trademark infringement or other actions based on the
nature and content of the materials. Although we carry general liability
insurance, our insurance may not cover potential claims of this type or may not
be adequate to cover all costs incurred in defense of potential claims or to
indemnify us for all liability that may be imposed.
11
DISRUPTION OF OUR SERVICES DUE TO ACCIDENTAL OR INTENTIONAL SECURITY BREACHES
MAY HARM OUR REPUTATION CAUSING A LOSS OF SALES AND COULD INCREASE OUR EXPENSES.
A significant barrier to the growth of wireless data services or transactions on
the Internet or by other electronic means has been the need for secure
transmission of confidential information. Our systems could be disrupted by
unauthorized access, computer viruses and other accidental or intentional
actions. We may incur significant costs to protect against the threat of
security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by such breaches. If a
third-party were able to misappropriate our users' personal or proprietary
information or credit card information, we could be subject to claims,
litigation or other potential liabilities that could materially adversely impact
our revenue and may result in the loss of customers.
ANY TYPE OF SYSTEMS FAILURE COULD REDUCE SALES, OR INCREASE COSTS OR RESULT IN
CLAIMS OF LIABILITY.
Our existing wireless data services are dependent on real-time, continuous feeds
from outside third parties. The ability of our subscribers to obtain data or
make wireless transactions through our service requires timely and uninterrupted
connections with our wireless network carriers. Any significant disruption in
the feeds or wireless carriers could result in delays in our subscribers'
ability to receive information or execute wireless transactions. There can be no
assurance that our systems will operate appropriately if we experience a
hardware or software failure or if there is an earthquake, fire or other natural
disaster, a power or telecommunications failure, insurrection or an act of war.
A failure in our systems could cause delays in transmitting data, and as a
result we may lose customers or face litigation that could involve material
costs and distract management from operating our business.
AN INTERRUPTION IN THE SUPPLY OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES THAT WE OBTAIN FROM THIRD
PARTIES COULD CAUSE A DECLINE IN SALES OF OUR SERVICES.
In designing, developing and supporting our wireless data services, we rely on
wireless carriers, wireless handheld device manufacturers, content providers and
software providers. These suppliers may experience difficulty in supplying us
products or services sufficient to meet our needs or they may terminate or fail
to renew contracts for supplying us these products or services on terms we find
acceptable. Any significant interruption in the supply of any of these products
or services could cause a decline in sales of our services unless and until we
are able to replace the functionality provided by these products and services.
We also depend on third parties to deliver and support reliable products,
enhance their current products, develop new products on a timely and
cost-effective basis and respond to emerging industry standards and other
technological changes. In addition, we rely on the ability of our content
providers to continue to provide us with uninterrupted access to the news and
financial information we provide to our customers. The failure of third parties
to meet these criteria, or their refusal or failure to deliver the information
for whatever reason, could materially harm our business.
RISK FACTORS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY
THERE IS NO ESTABLISHED MARKET FOR WIRELESS DATA SERVICES AND WE MAY NOT BE ABLE
TO SELL ENOUGH OF OUR SERVICES TO BECOME PROFITABLE.
The markets for wireless data services are still emerging and continued growth
in demand for and acceptance of these services remains uncertain. Current
barriers to market acceptance of these services include cost, reliability,
functionality and ease of use. We cannot be certain that these barriers will be
overcome. Our competitors may develop alternative wireless data communications
systems that gain broader market acceptance than our systems. If the market for
our services does not grow or grows more slowly than we currently anticipate, we
may not be able to attract customers for our services and our revenues would be
adversely affected.
THERE IS NO ASSURANCE THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO EFFECTIVELY COMPETE AGAINST
CURRENT AND FUTURE COMPETITORS.
There are a number of competitors who are larger and have much greater resources
than we do. Many of our competitors have more experienced people and larger
facilities and budgets than we do. These competitors could use their resources
to conduct greater amounts of research and development and to offer services at
lower prices than we can. These factors may adversely affect our ability to
compete by decreasing the demand for our products and services.
OUR ABILITY TO SELL NEW AND EXISTING SERVICES AT A PROFIT COULD BE IMPAIRED BY
COMPETITORS.
Intense competition could develop in the market for services we offer. We
developed our software using standard industry development tools. Many of our
agreements with wireless carriers, wireless handheld device manufacturers and
data providers are non-exclusive. Our competitors could develop and use the same
products and services in competition with us. With time and capital, it
12
would be possible for competitors to replicate our services. Our potential
competitors could include: wireless network carriers such as Verizon Wireless,
Cingular Interactive, Sprint PCS, Voice Stream, Nextel and AT&T Wireless;
wireless device manufacturers, such as Palm, Handspring, Motorola and RIM;
software developers such as Microsoft Corporation; emerging wireless Internet
service providers, such as Aether Systems, i3Mobile, Go America, Wolf Tech,
Avant Go and 724 Solutions and systems integrators such as IBM. Many of our
potential competitors have significantly greater resources than we do.
Furthermore, competitors may develop a different approach to marketing the
services we provide in which subscribers may not be required to pay for the
information provided by our services. Competition could reduce our market share
or force us to lower prices to unprofitable levels.
CONSOLIDATION IN OUR INDUSTRY COULD LEAD TO INCREASED COMPETITION AND LOSS OF
CUSTOMERS.
The Internet and wireless industries have experienced substantial consolidation.
We expect this consolidation to continue. These acquisitions could adversely
affect our business and results of operations in a number of ways, including the
following:
o our customers could acquire or be acquired by one of our competitors and
terminate their relationship with us;
o our customers could merge with other customers, which could reduce the size of
our customer base;
o current and potential competitors could improve their competitive positions
through strategic acquisitions; and
o companies from whom we acquire content could acquire or be acquired by one of
our competitors and stop licensing content to us.
THE MARKET FOR OUR SERVICES IS NEW AND HIGHLY UNCERTAIN.
The market for wireless data services is still emerging and continued growth in
demand for and acceptance of these services remains uncertain. Current barriers
to market acceptance of these services include cost, reliability, functionality
and ease of use. We cannot be certain that these barriers will be overcome. If
the market for our services does not grow or grows slower than we currently
anticipate, our business, financial condition and operating results could be
adversely affected.
NEW LAWS AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPACT OUR INDUSTRY COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR
BUSINESS.
We are not currently subject to direct regulation by the Federal Communications
Commission or any other governmental agency, other than regulations applicable
to businesses in general. However, in the future, we may become subject to
regulation by the FCC or another regulatory agency. In addition, the wireless
carriers who supply us airtime are subject to regulation by the FCC and
regulations that affect them could adversely affect our business, by, for
example, increasing our costs or reducing our ability to continue selling and
supporting our services. Our business could suffer depending on the extent to
which our activities or those of our customers or suppliers are regulated.
WE MAY FACE INTERRUPTION OF PRODUCTION AND SERVICES DUE TO INCREASED SECURITY
MEASURES IN RESPONSE TO TERRORISM.
Our business depends on the free flow of products and services through the
channels of commerce. Recently, in response to terrorists' activities and
threats aimed at the United States, transportation, mail, financial and other
services have been slowed or stopped altogether. Further delays or stoppages in
transportation, mail, financial or other services could have material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Furthermore, we may experience an increase in operating costs, such as costs for
transportation, insurance and security as a result of the activities and
potential activities. We may also experience delays in receiving payments from
payers that have been affected by the terrorist activities and potential
activities. The U.S. economy in general is being adversely affected by the
terrorist activities and potential activities and any economic downturn could
adversely impact our results of operations, impair our ability to raise capital
or otherwise adversely affect our ability to grow our business.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR STOCK PRICE
OUR STOCK PRICE HAS BEEN AND MAY CONTINUE TO BE VOLATILE.
The trading price of our common stock has historically been highly volatile.
Since we began trading on the American Stock Exchange, our stock price has
ranged from $0.10 to $42.00 (as adjusted for stock splits). We expect that the
market price of our common stock will continue to fluctuate as a result of
variations in our quarterly operating results and other factors beyond our
control. These fluctuations may be exaggerated if the trading volume of our
common stock is low. In addition, due to the technology-intensive and emerging
nature of our business, the market price of our common stock may rise and fall
in response to a variety of factors, including:
- - announcements of technological or competitive developments;
13
- - acquisitions or strategic alliances by us or our competitors;
- - the gain or loss of a significant customer or order;
- - changes in estimates of our financial performance or changes in
recommendations by securities analysts regarding us or our industry; or
- - general market or economic conditions.
This risk may be heightened because our industry is new and evolving,
characterized by rapid technological change and susceptible to the introduction
of new competing technologies or competitors.
In addition, the market for internet, wireless and technology companies in
particular have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. These price
and volume fluctuations often have been unrelated to the operating performance
of the affected companies. These broad market and industry factors and general
economic conditions may materially and adversely affect our stock price.
WE DO NOT PLAN TO PAY ANY DIVIDENDS.
Our shares should not be purchased by investors who need income from their
holdings. We intend to retain any future earnings to fund the operation and
expansion of our business. We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our
shares in the future. As a result, our common stock is not a good investment for
people who need income from their holdings.
FUTURE SALES OF COMMON SHARES BY OUR EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS COULD CAUSE OUR SHARE
PRICE TO FALL.
The volume of trading in our common shares on the American Stock Exchange has
not been substantial. As a result, even small dispositions of our common shares
in the public market could cause the market price of the common shares to fall.
The perception among investors that these sales will occur could also produce
this effect.
We have granted options to purchase our common shares in accordance with our
1996 Stock Option Plan. The exercise of options and the subsequent sale of
shares could adversely affect the market price of our common shares. In 2001 we
registered approximately 1,500,000 shares of common stock subject to resale by
certain of our security holders, and we have contractual obligations that will
potentially require us to register an additional 1,000,000 shares. We are unable
to predict the effect that sales of these shares may have on the then prevailing
market price of our shares. It is likely that market sales of large amounts of
our shares (or the potential for those sales even if they do not actually occur)
will have the effect of depressing the market price of our shares.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report, including the sections entitled "Description of Business", "Recent
Acquisitions" and "Risk Factors," contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements in this report regarding Semotus' outlook
for its business and their respective markets, such as projections of future
performance, statements of management's plans and objectives, forecasts of
market trends and other matters, are forward-looking statements. These
statements relate to future events or our future financial and operating
performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
that may cause our or our industry's actual results, levels of activity,
performance or achievements to be materially different from that expressed or
implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and other factors
include, among other things, those listed under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in
this prospectus. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by
terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates,"
"believes," "estimates," "predicts," "potential," "continue," "our future
success depends," "seek to continue" or the negative of these terms or other
comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or
results may differ materially. In evaluating these statements, you should
specifically consider various factors, including the risks outlined under "Risk
Factors." These factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from
any forward-looking statement.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of
activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person
assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these statements. We
do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of
this prospectus to conform these statements to actual results except as required
by law.
14
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
Our corporate headquarters are located in Los Gatos, California. The accounting
and legal, as well as a portion of our marketing, sales, and customer support
departments are housed at this location. The headquarters facility is
approximately 2,000 square feet, which is under a lease that expires on
September 20, 2004, with an option to terminate one year earlier without
penalty.
Some of Semotus' subsidiaries have facilities in various locations around the
country. Semotus Systems Corp., which houses the Company's engineering and
Research and Development group, is located in Vancouver, British Columbia, where
it occupies a facility of approximately 2,437 square feet. This lease expires on
June 30, 2007. Application Design Associates has offices located in Englewood,
Colorado, of approximately 3,191 square feet under a three-year lease effective
February 1, 2003. As of May 6, 2003, this lease is no longer an obligation of
Semotus because of the sale of ADA (See Note 26, "Strategic Investment in ADA".)
Five Star's lease was cancelled without penalty on June 30, 2002, at the time of
the closing of the Five Star operations.
We believe that the existing facilities will be sufficient to meet our current
needs. Should we need additional space to accommodate increased activities, we
believe we can secure additional space at comparable cost.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
Wizshop.com, Inc., one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, filed a lawsuit against
Earthlink Network, Inc. and Earthlink Operations, Inc. (collectively
"Earthlink") on April 15, 2002 in the California Superior Court. This suit
alleges eight causes of action against Earthlink, including breach of written
agreement, promissory fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of fiduciary duty,
constructive fraud, unfair business practices, accounting and constructive
trust. The suit arises out of Earthlink's breach of the written agreement with
Wizshop, and Earthlink's apparent acts of fraud in connection with Earthlink's
failure and refusal to accurately account for and pay to Wizshop revenues to
which Wizshop is entitled to under the agreement. We are seeking monetary
damages for the above matter. On May 19, 2003, the parties reached a settlement
and signed a settlement and mutual general release agreement, in which Earthlink
agreed to pay to WizShop a total sum of $210,000.
Semotus and WizShop were dismissed with prejudice on March 7, 2003 from a class
action lawsuit brought by the California Teachers' Retirement System in November
of 2002.
We are also a party to other legal proceedings in the normal course of business.
Based on evaluation of these matters and discussions with counsel, we believe
that any potential liabilities arising from these matters will not have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial
position.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTER TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
No matters were submitted to the Company's stockholders for consideration during
the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE COMPANY'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
(a) MARKET INFORMATION. Our common stock first began trading on the OTC Bulletin
Board on May 9, 1997. On December 29, 1999, trading in our common stock moved to
the American Stock Exchange ("AMEX"), under the symbol "DLK". On August 14, 2000
trading in our common stock moved to the Nasdaq National Market ("Nasdaq"),
under the symbol "XLNK". On December 18, 2000, trading in our common stock moved
back to the AMEX under the symbol "DLK".
A 2 for 1 forward stock split became effective on April 27, 2000. Share prices
have been adjusted to reflect this split.
The following table sets forth the high and low closing sales prices of our
common stock as reported by the AMEX for the periods indicated:
------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------
HIGH LOW
------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------
FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2002
------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------
Quarter ended June 30, 2001 $ 3.15 $ 1.46
------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------
Quarter ended September 30, 2001 $ 1.75 $ 0.66
------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------
Quarter ended December 31, 2001 $ 1.05 $ 0.53
------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------
Quarter ended March 31, 2002 $ 0.94 $ 0.60
------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------
FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2003
------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------
Quarter ended June 30, 2002 $ 0.70 $ 0.25
------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------
15
------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------
Quarter ended September 30, 2002 $ 0.39 $ 0.14
------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------
Quarter ended December 31, 2002 $ 0.27 $ 0.10
------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------
Quarter ended March 31, 2003 $ 0.20 $ 0.11
------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------
(b) HOLDERS. As of March 31, 2003 we had approximately 450 shareholders of
record. We believe that in excess of 15,000 beneficial owners hold shares of the
Company's common stock in depository or nominee form.
(c) DIVIDENDS. We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock. We currently intend to retain earnings, if any, to support the
development and growth of our business and we do not anticipate paying any cash
dividends in the foreseeable future.
(d) SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS. The
information required by this Item will be included in the Company's Proxy
Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in September 2003
under the caption "Executive Compensation - Summary Information Concerning Stock
Option Plans," which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003,
and is incorporation by reference.
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES. During the Quarter ended March 31, 2003
the Company issued securities which were not registered under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended as follows: On January 24, 2003, the Company issued a total
of 1,153,846 shares of its common stock to Brown Simpson Partners, I Ltd. due
from Brown Simpson's exercise of 1,153,846 warrants at $0.01 per share for a
total of $11,538.46. With respect to these transactions, the Company relied on
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The investors were given
complete information concerning the Company. The appropriate restrictive legend
was placed on the certificates and stop transfer instructions were issued to the
transfer agent.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction
with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations," our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and other
financial information included elsewhere in this report. The selected
consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended March 31, 1999,
2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 are derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements.
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001 2000* 1999*
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
(UNAUDITED) (UNAUDITED)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Revenues:
Wireless services $ 1,293,801 $ 1,305,347 $ 1,731,948 $ 1,459,920 $ 2,128,438
Enterprise and commerce sales 1,005,060 1,114,481 -- -- --
Professional and related services 45,390 111,590 178,246 -- --
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total revenue 2,344,251 2,531,418 1,910,194 1,459,920 2,128,438
Cost of Sales:
Wireless services 347,312 511,837 985,305 805,099 822,636
Enterprise and commerce sales 576,959 654,885 -- -- --
Professional and related services 4,972 28,556 49,298 -- --
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total cost of sales 929,243 1,195,278 1,034,603 805,099 822,636
Gross Profit 1,415,008 1,336,140 875,591 654,821 1,305,802
Operating expenses from continuing operations:
Research and development 719,965 1,010,720 1,187,348 600,957 798,549
Sales and marketing 1,027,366 1,849,582 4,098,228 1,608,056 2,937,140
General and administrative 2,238,825 3,203,131 4,218,224 3,428,314 2,816,655
Impairment of goodwill -- 3,617,283 -- -- --
Impairment of intangible assets -- 3,420,000 -- -- --
16
Depreciation and amortization 1,313,596 3,080,063 1,786,514 -- 205,305
Stock, option and warrant expense 52,455 496,181 601,932 -- --
Operating loss from continuing operations (3,937,199) (15,340,820) (11,016,655) (4,982,507) (5,451,847)
Net loss from continuing operations (2,761,842) (14,781,925) (9,913,215) (4,246,949) (4,430,164)
Net loss from discontinued operations (799,090) (3,662,553) (1,380,166) -- --
Gain from disposal of discontinued
operations 128,582 -- -- -- --
Net loss $ (3,432,350) $(18,444,478) $(11,293,381) $ (4,246,949) $ (4,430,164)
Net loss per common share from
continuing operations $ (0.15) $ (0.87) $ (0.65) $ (0.59) $ (1.06)
Net loss per common share from
discontinued operations $ (0.04) $ (0.22) $ (0.09) -- --
Net loss per common share $ (0.19) $ (1.09) $ (0.74) $ (0.59) $ (1.06)
Weighted average shares 18,039,262 16,975,660 15,199,895 7,213,715 4,187,374
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash and cash equivalents (including
restricted cash) $ 1,976,062 $ 4,751,094 7,330,749 $ 15,673,264 $ 3,169,443
Working capital 1,464,645 2,064,396 7,479,156 15,753,980 1,664,133
Total assets 4,648,556 10,337,063 21,769,961 16,597,406 4,057,067
Long-term liabilities 336,405 821,475 898,617 1,362,590 1,778,049
Preferred shareholders' equity -- 5,682,456 5,682,456 9,315,501 --
Common shareholders' equity 3,309,727 294,481 13,182,551 5,804,468 2,427,999
* Fiscal years 2000 and 1999 selected financial data is presented in this table
as originally filed by Semotus with the SEC in the Form 10K. The data are not
restated to take into consideration the acquisition of Five Star on December 28,
2000 under the pooling method of accounting, which, because of the
discontinuance of the operations of Five Star, would have appeared only in the
net loss or gain from discontinued operations.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the attached
financial statements and notes thereto. Except for the historical information
contained herein, the matters discussed below are forward-looking statements
that involve certain risks and uncertainties, including, among others, the risks
and uncertainties discussed below.
OVERVIEW
At the end of the fiscal year 2002 and continuing through fiscal year 2003,
Semotus determined that the economy would continue in a weak recovery and that
the market for technology products would stay anemic. Accordingly, the Company
has continued to centralize and consolidate its organization and its operations.
The headcount has been reduced 50% since March 31, 2002 and as a result,
engineering, sales and marketing and administrative costs have been reduced and
centralized. The overall Semotus organization has eliminated redundant positions
and functions while improving the sales effort through utilizing existing
customer relationships to shorten the sales cycle.
Semotus has organized its operations around two core lines of businesses, while
maintaining but de-emphasizing its other operations: i) financial services with
the Global Market Pro and Equity Market Pro products and services and ii)
workforce automation with the HiplinkXS family of products and services. These
products maintain high gross and operating margins and form the core of the
enterprise software marketing strategy with wireless and mobile features
available in the software.
Logistic systems, comprised largely of ADA's products and services, has been
sold as of May 6, 2003 and is presented in discontinued operations. This is due
to Global Beverage Group (GBG), a Canadian-based direct store delivery
consortium and a 49% shareholder in ADA, exercising its option to purchase the
remaining 51% of ADA from Semotus. In January 2002, GBG completed a strategic
investment in ADA and became a 49% shareholder in ADA (see "Significant Events"
and see Note 26 to the Financial Statements, "Strategic Investment in ADA"). ADA
develops and licenses proprietary software that gives enterprises a total
solution for automation
17
of customer call centers, dispatching, equipment deployment, servicing and
invoicing while interfacing with existing corporate business functions and ERP
solutions.
Certain professional services have been de-emphasized. In this fiscal year,
Simkin's Kinetidex 2.0 product was sold to the joint developer and exclusive
distributor of the product, Micromedex, Inc. Wireless medical software products
have been slow to penetrate the market and therefore have been eliminated by
Semotus. Other unprofitable professional service contracts at Wares On the Web
have been eliminated and Wares was closed in August 2002.
M-commerce initiatives have been reduced. The e-commerce economy has contracted
and m-commerce is not expected to make a significant contribution in the market
in the near future. Consequently, Semotus has reduced its e-commerce and
m-commerce presence with the closure of the Wares' and Five Star businesses, and
elimination of unprofitable products and services in that segment. At WizShop,
the operations have been largely consolidated into Semotus' other divisions and
subsidiaries. At the end of June, FiveStar's operations were closed as the
market for e-fulfillment is currently unprofitable, and in August, Wares'
operations were closed. (See "Significant Events".)
FACTORS AFFECTING COMPARABILITY
Semotus has transitioned its business from consumer driven wireless products and
services to enterprise-based application software products and services with
emphasis in the mobile and wireless software markets. This transition has mostly
taken place since March 2000. As part of the transition, Semotus acquired six
companies. Subsequently, as the technology economy has declined since January
2001, Semotus has centralized and consolidated its operations and has closed
Five Star and Wares, sold ADA, and consolidated Simkin and WizShop.
STRATEGIC REPOSITIONING
In FY 2000, the Company announced a strategic repositioning as an enterprise
application software company emphasizing mobile and wireless solutions that
deliver end-to-end wireless data solutions to enterprises and custom data
applications to their customers utilizing its patented Xpresslink(TM)
application server. This repositioning involved major infrastructure changes,
which continued throughout FY 2001.
Semotus is concentrating on providing consulting and engineering services and
turnkey applications for enterprise application software. Further, with its
recently acquired subsidiaries, Semotus provides software and consulting
products and services and marketing, sales, customer service and logistics
management to existing customers in the targeted vertical markets. Semotus then
provides additional service through wirelessly enabling those customers.
ACQUISITIONS
As part of the Company's previous growth strategy, Semotus acquired six
companies: Cross, Simkin, Wares, Five Star, WizShop and ADA. For specific
information concerning the acquired companies see Note 4 to the Financial
Statements, "Acquisitions". Each provided revenues and a significant customer
base to allow the Company to add to its technology, expand its product offerings
and penetrate targeted vertical markets. However, due to the continued economic
recession and limited capital spending, the Company began and is currently
continuing with its Centralization and Consolidation Plan. As part of that
effort, Semotus decided to reduce its e-commerce operations, to close the
FiveStar business as of the end of June 2002 and to close the Wares' business as
of August 2002. Both Simkin's and WizShop's operations have been consolidated,
and as of May 6, 2003, ADA has been sold.
CENTRALIZATION AND CONSOLIDATION PLAN
In May 2002, the Board of Directors of Semotus determined that the Company
needed to focus its operations on its core enterprise software products. (See
"Centralization and Consolidation Plan"). Given the continued economic recession
and limited capital spending, as well as the reduced access to capital, the
Company must economically utilize its limited resources towards those products
with the best margins and cash flow generation. As part of that effort, Semotus
has decided to reduce its e-commerce operations and to close the FiveStar
business as of the end of June 2002 and to close the Wares' business as of
August 2002. While maintaining a reduced m-commerce and e-commerce presence,
Semotus has de-emphasized the e-fulfillment portion of that business as the
e-fulfillment markets have declined dramatically over the past year and are not
expected to recover significantly in the near future. Additionally, the
remaining 51% of ADA was purchased by GBG on May 6, 2003. Accordingly, Semotus
is redirecting its human and capital resources towards more profitable products
and services.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS AND GOODWILL
Semotus' management performs an on-going analysis of the recoverability of its
goodwill and other intangibles and the value of its investments in accordance
with SFAS 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". Based on quantitative and
qualitative measures,
18
the Company assesses the need to record impairment losses on long-lived assets
used in operations when impairment indicators are present.
A number of factors indicated that impairment may have arisen in the period
ended March 31, 2002 for certain amounts of goodwill related to the acquisitions
of Simkin, Wares and WizShop. Also, an impairment may have arisen with the
recorded asset value of the Company's Global Market Pro intellectual property.
For Simkin, the analysis was to determine if a further reduction in goodwill was
necessary. Semotus had previously taken a $650,000 net impairment charge in the
quarter ended June 30, 2001. See Note 7, "Sale of Technology and Net Impairment
of Goodwill". For Wares and WizShop, Semotus analyzed the current carrying value
of the goodwill related to both acquisitions.
The result of this analysis has necessitated charges to income of certain
intangible assets which include goodwill, GMP intellectual property and acquired
software. Those charges total approximately $7 million for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2002. See Notes 6 and 7 to the Financial Statements, "Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill" and "Sale of Technology and Net Impairment of
Goodwill" respectively. No further impairment charges in continuing operations
have been taken in fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, although a net loss from
discontinued operations of $799,090 was taken for the operations of Five Star,
Wares and ADA, mostly comprised of an impairment to goodwill of $635,724 at ADA.
Management has determined that the remaining goodwill of $1,430,141 (net of
accumulated amortization of $727,058) is fairly valued using the impairment
tests as described in SFAS 144 and SFAS 142, which includes discounted cash flow
analysis and comparable company analysis. This remaining amount of goodwill
consists entirely of one of the Company's wireless enterprise application
software product lines, the HipLink family of software products, which is
generating current revenue and cash flow.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The critical accounting policies are revenue recognition, cost allocation to
revenue and valuation of intangible assets.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company recognizes revenues in each of its lines of business based upon
contract terms and completion of the sales process.
Wireless services: revenue is generated from wireless services provided to
enterprises and consumers. The revenue is from recurring monthly charges based
on utilization fees, transaction fees, and maintenance and service charges. In
the financial consumer business, the Company also receives a small revenue
stream from pager rentals. Revenues are recognized over the service period and
any revenue that relates to more than one service period is recognized ratably
over those service periods. In the premise-based business, wireless software is
delivered to the customer and revenue is recognized upon shipment, assuming no
significant obligations remain.
Enterprise and commerce sales and service: revenue is generated from online
sales, advertising, sponsorships and hosting fees and other services. Revenue is
recognized upon a completed sale and shipment of a product and for advertising
and sponsorships, revenue is recognized when payment is received. Hosting fees
and other services, such as licensing, are recognized ratably over the service
period.
Professional and related services: revenue is generated from software
engineering and sales and from training and consultation. Revenue is recognized
when the engineering, training or consultation work has been performed in
accordance with the contract.
COST OF REVENUE
The cost of revenue for the wireless services line of business principally
includes costs to obtain data feeds from various exchanges, costs of engineering
development directed to specifically identified products, costs of servicing and
hosting customer products, costs for pager rental or depreciation and pager
airtime for those customers without their own pagers, and certain telephone,
computer and other direct operational costs.
The cost of revenue for the enterprise and commerce sales and service line of
business includes the purchase cost of the products, advertising, costs of
servicing and hosting and shipping. Any engineering costs directly related to
the products offered are also included as a cost of revenue.
The cost of revenue for professional and related services is primarily personnel
costs for engineering, training and consulting.
VALUATION OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Semotus' management performs an on-going analysis of the recoverability of its
goodwill and other intangibles and the value of its investments in accordance
with SFAS No. 144 and SFAS 142. Based on quantitative and qualitative measures,
the Company assesses
19
the need to record impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations
when impairment indicators are present.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144 and SFAS 142, the Company performs an
undiscounted cash flow analysis of its acquisition to determine whether an
impairment existed. When the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying
value of the net assets, management determines a range of fair values using a
combination of valuation methodologies. The methodologies include:
- - Discounted cash flow analysis, which is based upon converting expected future
cash flows to present value.
- - Changes in market value since the date of acquisition relative to the
following:
- - The Company's stock price;
- - Comparable companies;
- - Contribution to the Company's market valuation and overall business prospects.
Long-term assets, such as intellectual property rights and goodwill are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the economic life of the assets. The
expected useful life of those assets is currently five years. The Company
adopted SFAS 141 "Business Combinations" and SFAS 142 "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets" as of April 1, 2002. Accordingly, Semotus no longer amortizes
intangible assets with an indefinite useful life and will begin assessing
potential future impairments of such intangible assets, but performs impairments
tests on a quarterly basis to analyze the current fair market value of the
intangible assets in relation to the carrying value of the assets.
In prior years, Semotus had capitalized the fair value of contracts acquired in
business combinations as required by APB 16 "Business Combinations". Fair value
was determined by estimating the cost expected to be incurred in order to
perform the obligations under the contract plus adding a reasonable profit
associated with the performance effort. The capitalized cost was amortized into
cost of revenue as revenues were recognized.
For other accounting policies see Note 3 to the Financial Statements, "Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies".
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
All financial results for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
have been restated for the discontinued operations of Five Star, Wares and ADA.
REVENUES
Revenues for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 were $2,344,251,
$2,531,418 and $1,910,194, respectively.
The 7% decrease in overall revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003
versus 2002 was due to the continuation of the technology recession as the
enterprise and commerce sales and the professional services segments had
declines with fewer new customers and contracts. Wireless Services generally
maintained its level of revenues.
The overall increase in revenues at March 31, 2002 from March 31, 2001 is due to
the revenues associated with a significant contract at the WizShop subsidiary in
the enterprise and commerce segment, which was started in April 2002. Further,
there was some small growth in the professional services business. This was
offset somewhat by the decline in sales in the wireless segment as corporations
reduced their capital spending at the onset of the recession.
WIRELESS SERVICES
The revenues in this segment were essentially the same in the years ended March
31, 2003 versus 2002. While there has been some variability in the number of
customers, the overall revenue level has not changed as corporate capital
spending has stabilized although it is at a modest level of spending.
The 25% decline in revenues from March 31, 2001 to 2002 is the result of two
opposite trends that have continued from the year ended March 31, 2000. First,
there was an approximate 14% increase in revenues in the enterprise application
software business from the sales of HiplinkXS and GMP and EMP financial
products. This has been more than offset by the 66% decline in the Company's
financial consumer software products. The Company has emphasized its enterprise
products, which continue to sell well in the economic recession.
20
ENTERPRISE AND COMMERCE SALES
The 10% decline in revenues from March 31, 2002 to March 31, 2003 is due to the
smaller amortization into revenue of the WizShop customer loyalty contract. The
contract is completely amortized as of March 31, 2003.
The increase in revenues from March 31, 2001 to March 31, 2002 is due to the
revenues associated with the WizShop customer loyalty contract, which began in
April 2002.
PROFESSIONAL AND RELATED SERVICES
The 59% decrease in revenues from March 31, 2002 to March 31, 2003 is due to the
decline in new professional services contracts, mainly from the Simkin
subsidiary. Wireless medical software products have been slow to penetrate the
market and therefore have been eliminated by Semotus. Other unprofitable
professional service contracts have also been eliminated.
The 37% decrease in revenues from March 31, 2001 to 2002 is largely the result
of the decline in new professional services contracts, mainly from the Simkin
subsidiary.
COST OF REVENUES AND GROSS MARGIN
The overall gross profit margin increased by 7% in March 31, 2003 to 60%, due
largely to the higher margin wireless services segment which is a larger
component of the overall revenue mix and from the improved margins with the
Centralization and Consolidation Plan implementation.
The overall gross profit margin increased by 7% to 53% in the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2002. The wireless services business gross profit margin improved to
60% as more of the enterprise application software was sold versus the consumer
financial software, which has a lower margin. Further , the addition of the
WizShop contract, in the enterprise and commerce segment, with a higher margin
added to the increase in the overall company gross profit margin.
WIRELESS SERVICES
The 73% gross profit margin for the wireless segment for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2003 is the result of Semotus is selling more of the enterprise
application software, which carries higher gross margins than the consumer
financial software. Further, through the Centralization and Consolidation Plan,
Semotus has become more efficient in all of its business which has improved
gross and operating margins.
The 60% gross profit margin for the wireless segment for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2002 is the result of the continuing trends in this business. Semotus
is selling more of the enterprise application software, which carries higher
gross margins than the consumer financial software. Further, the consumer
business is continuing to decline as a percentage of wireless revenues, as fewer
individuals maintain their subscriptions.
Cost of revenues in this segment principally includes costs to obtain data feeds
from various exchanges, costs of engineering development directed to
specifically identified products, costs of servicing and hosting customer
products, costs for pager rental or depreciation and pager airtime for those
customers without their own pagers, and certain telephone, computer and other
direct operational costs.
ENTERPRISE AND COMMERCE SALES
The gross profit margin in this segment increased to 43% in the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2003 as the initial costs associated with the WizShop contract
were absorbed in fiscal year 2002; the contract began in April 2001.
The gross profit margin in this segment was 41% in the fiscal year ended March
31, 2002.
PROFESSIONAL AND RELATED SERVICES
The gross profit margin increased to 89% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003
due to the elimination of unprofitable contracts and services. As the
professional services business has declined, the remaining contracts have the
highest margins.
The gross profit margin slightly increased by 2% to 74% in the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2002, which is largely due to the mix of contracts serviced in the
year. Many of the unprofitable contracts with lower margins in this segment were
eliminated through the Centralization and Consolidation Plan.
21
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operating expenses decreased in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, due to the
continued reduction in overall expenses through the Centralization and
Consolidation Plan. Further, there were not any impairment charges taken in the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2003.
Although operating expenses increased in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002,
this was substantially all the result of impairment charges to goodwill and
intangible assets and to increased depreciation and amortization expense. Sales
and marketing expenses and general and administrative expenses declined in the
fiscal year as Semotus installed a corporate-wide cost reduction and cash
management program, which has significantly reduced these expenses.
The Company categorizes operating expenses into five major categories: research
and development, sales and marketing, general and administrative, depreciation
and amortization and stock, option and warrant expense. For the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2002, there are two categories of impairment charges: goodwill
and intangible assets. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, there were not
any impairment charges from continuing operations. The table below summarizes
the changes in these categories of operating expenses:
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
----------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION 2003 2002 2001
- ----------- ---- ---- ----
Research and development $ 719,965 $ 1,010,720 $ 1,187,348
Sales and marketing 1,027,366 1,849,582 4,098,228
General and administrative 2,238,825 3,203,131 4,218,224
Impairment of goodwill -- 3,617,283 --
Impairment of intangible assets -- 3,420,000 --
Depreciation and amortization 1,313,596 3,080,063 1,786,514
Stock, option and warrant expense 52,455 496,181 601,932
Totals $ 5,352,207 $ 16,676,960 $ 11,892,246
Research and development expenses are expenses incurred in developing new
products and product enhancements for current products. These expenditures are
charged to expense as incurred. These costs are due principally for the
development of updates to existing products and new products, such as Futures
Market Pro, Equity Market Pro, Global Market Pro, and the new release of the
Company's enterprise application products, HiplinkXS, OpenLink, IQLink, RemLink.
Much of the development work for these products has been completed and
currently, research and development expenses have been reduced as part of the
Centralization and Consolidation Plan.
Sales and marketing expenses consist of costs incurred to develop and implement
marketing and sales programs for the Company's product lines. These include
costs required to staff the marketing department and develop a sales and
marketing strategy, participation in trade shows, media development and
advertising, and web site development and maintenance. These costs also include
the expenses of hiring sales personnel and maintaining a customer support call
center.
These costs have declined principally due to the reduction in general
advertising and non-sales supported marketing. There has been a reduction in
marketing personnel as the Company has shifted to emphasizing marketing and
sales support for its existing products.
General and administrative expenses include senior management, accounting, legal
and consulting. This category also includes the costs associated with being a
publicly traded company, including the costs of the Nasdaq and AMEX listings,
investor and public relations, rent, administrative personnel, and other
overhead related costs.
These costs declined during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 and March 31,
2003 as personnel and offices were reduced and operating functions were
consolidated. This trend should continue as Semotus continues to implement its
Centralization and Consolidation Plan.
In the prior year, Semotus' management performed an on-going analysis of the
recoverability of its goodwill and other intangibles and the value of its
investments in accordance with SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and For Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of," and in
accordance with SFAS 142, goodwill and other intangible assets. Based on
quantitative and qualitative measures, the Company assessed the need to record
impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when impairment
indicators were present. As a result of Semotus' review, management determined
that the carrying value of goodwill and recorded asset value were not fully
recoverable and an impairment charge of $3,617,283 was taken comprised of an
impairment charge to Simkin's goodwill of $909,272 and $2,708,011 for WizShop's
goodwill in fiscal year 2002. Furthermore, Semotus took an impairment charge of
$3,420,000 for GMP in the quarter ended March 31, 2002. See Notes 6 and 7,
"Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill" and "Sale of Technology and Net
Impairment of Goodwill" respectively, to the Financial Statements in this 10K.
There were no impairment charges from continuing operations in the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2003, although an impairment
22
charge of $635,724 was taken in the discontinued operations of ADA. Management
has determined that the remaining goodwill of $1,430,141 (net of accumulated
amortization of $727,058) is fairly valued using the impairment tests as
described in SFAS 144 and SFAS 142, which includes discounted cash flow analysis
and comparable company analysis. This remaining amount of goodwill consists
entirely of one of the Company's wireless enterprise application software
product lines, the HipLink family of software products, which is generating
current revenue and cash flow.
In accordance with SFAS 144, Semotus has presented the operations of FiveStar,
Wares and ADA as discontinued operations. In the net loss from discontinued
operations for 2002 and 2003, impairment charges were taken against the goodwill
of both Wares (fiscal year 2002) and ADA (fiscal year2003). As discussed in Note
6, "Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill," Semotus performed the
impairment tests and determined that impairment charges were required. The
impairment expense for the Wares goodwill was $1,156,587 and for the ADA
goodwill was $635,724.
Depreciation and amortization expense includes depreciation of computers and
other related hardware and certain fixtures. Amortization includes goodwill
costs and certain intellectual property costs. The increase in this expense from
March 31, 2001 to 2002 is primarily the result of the amortization of goodwill
from the Company's acquisitions and the amortization associated with the
warrants awarded to Chase in connection with Global Market Pro (GMP). The
decline in this expense through fiscal 2003 is as a result of the impairment
charges in fiscal 2002 which reduced the asset balances to be amortized and from
the decline in capital spending at Semotus.
The non-cash charges for compensation consists mainly of grants of stock,
options and warrants for services provided to the Company. Such services include
financial, marketing and public relations consulting. Additionally, common stock
was issued for certain accrued liabilities. The decline in non-cash charges for
compensation is due mainly to the termination of contracts with service
providers, which called for stock or warrant compensation, as well as the
decline in the stock and option grants to service providers, in the fiscal years
ended March 31, 2003 and 2002.
The common stock issued was valued at the fair market value of stock issued, or
in the instance of common stock purchase warrants, in accordance with the
Black-Scholes pricing guidelines. Certain employee stock options, which have
been repriced, are subject to the variable plan requirements of APB No. 25, that
requires the Company to record compensation expense for changes in the fair
value of the Company's common stock. While no compensation expense was required
to be recognized in FY 2003, FY2002 or FY 2001, expense will be recognized in
the future if the stock price increases above the exercise price of the options.
NON-OPERATING INCOME AND EXPENSES
Non-operating income and expenses are primarily made up of interest income from
invested cash, interest expense from a note payable and retired bank lines of
credit, amortization of advances from technology sales received in previous
periods, and the owner's fees and offsetting interest income recognized, related
to the technology sales. The following tables reflect the changes in other
income (expense).
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION 2003 2002 2001
- ----------- ---- ---- ----
Net interest income $ 52,301 $ 269,210 $ 671,915
Owners fee sales of technology (1,176,750) (1,569,000) (1,569,000)
Interest on note from sales of technology 1,176,750 1,569,000 1,569,000
Amortization of technology advances 206,723 306,908 371,052
Gain from cancellation of sales of 628,927 -- --
technology contracts
Miscellaneous income (expenses) 287,406 (17,223) 60,473
------------ ------------ ------------
$ 1,175,357 $ 558,895 $ 1,103,440
============ ============ ============
Non-operating income, net of expenses, increased in the fiscal year ended March
31, 2003 versus 2002, due to the cancellation of the technology sales contracts,
of which the remaining deferred balances were recognized as income. This was
offset somewhat due to less cash available for investment during the year
resulting from the operating losses and the amortization of technology advances.
decreased somewhat due to the application of the effective interest method of
amortization on the balances.
Non-operating income, net of expenses, decreased in the year ended March 31,
2002 from the year ended March 31, 2001, due primarily to a decline in interest
income resulting from less cash during the year that was available for
investment. The two major sources of cash in fiscal year 2001 were the private
placement of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock completed in February 2000 and
the exercise of common stock warrants. Amortization of technology advances
decreased somewhat, due to the application of the effective interest method of
amortization on the balances.
23
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The decrease in the comprehensive loss for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003
to $3,383,296 or $(0.19) per share was due to an improvement in the overall
operating efficiency of the Company as the consolidation and Centralization Plan
has been implemented. The gross profit margin improved and the operating costs
were reduced. Further, there were no impairment charges in the year ended March
31, 2003. The Company also disposed of the operations of Five Star, Wares and
ADA.
The increase in the comprehensive loss for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002
to $18,484,302 or $(1.09) per share compared to $11,314,517 or $(0.74) per share
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001 was due principally to a 511% increase
in non-cash charges to income from impairments of goodwill and intangible assets
and the amortization of intangible assets. These costs were offset somewhat with
a 53% increase in gross profit dollars and reductions in sales and marketing
expenses and general and administrative expenses.
SEGMENT RESULTS
Semotus' business has evolved into three segments: wireless services, enterprise
and commerce sales, and professional and related services. See "Business
Description - Services and Products" for further information about each of the
segments. As Semotus continues to centralize and consolidate its business, the
nature and structure of the business segments may change. The Company intends to
consolidate all of its segments beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year
2004.
Specific results of the segments are discussed under "Revenues" and "Cost of
Revenues and Gross Margin" in this section titled "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations".
Enterprise
and Professional
Wireless commerce and related Corporate and
Services sales services other Total
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
As of and for the Year Ended March 31, 2003:
Revenue from continuing operations $ 1,293,801 $ 1,005,060 $ 45,390 -- $ 2,344,251
Gross profit from continuing operations $ 946,489 $ 428,101 $ 40,418 -- $ 1,415,008
Operating loss from continuing operations* $ (1,254,049) $ 308,775 $ 21,846 $ (3,013,771) $ (3,937,199)
Net loss from discontinued operations -- -- -- $ (799,090) $ (799,090)
Depreciation and amortization from continuing $ 251,262 $ 60,454 $ 1,880 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,313,596
operations
Capital expenditures $ 16,949 -- -- -- $ 16,949
Total assets from discontinued operations -- -- -- $ 706,932 $ 706,932
Total assets, March 31, 2003 $ 3,027,947 $ 482,237 $ 265,613 $ 872,759 $ 4,648,556
As of and for the Year Ended March 31, 2002:
Revenue from continuing operations $ 1,305,347 $ 1,114,481 $ 111,590 -- $ 2,531,418
Gross profit from continuing operations $ 793,510 $ 459,595 $ 83,035 -- $ 1,336,140
Operating loss from continuing operations* $ (837,442) $ (75,944) $ (113,520) $(14,313,914) $(15,340,820)
Net loss from discontinued operations $ -- -- -- $ (3,662,553) $ (3,662,553)
Depreciation and amortization from continuing
operations $ 340,482 $ 42,291 $ 25,005 $ 2,672,285 $ 3,080,063
Capital expenditures $ 24,588 -- -- -- $ 24,588
Total assets from discontinued operations -- -- -- $ 1,600,341 $ 1,600,341
Total assets, March 31, 2002 $ 7,133,204 $ 1,272,567 $ 246,597 $ 1,684,695 $ 10,337,063
As of and for the Year Ended March 31, 2001:
Revenue from continuing operations $ 1,731,948 -- $ 178,246 -- $ 1,910,194
Gross profit from continuing operations $ 746,643 -- $ 128,948 -- $ 875,591
Operating loss from continuing operations* $ (3,016,513) -- $ (265,616) $ (7,734,526) $(11,016,655)
Net loss from discontinued operations -- -- -- $ (1,380,166) $ (1,380,166)
Depreciation and amortization from continuing $ 282,832 -- $ 9,208 $ 1,494,474 $ 1,786,514
operations
Capital expenditures $ 223,231 -- -- $ 203,208 $ 426,439
Total assets from discontinued operations -- -- -- $ 2,419,982 $ 2,419,982
Total assets, March 31, 2001 $ 8,894,324 -- $ 1,461,401 $ 11,414,236 $ 21,769,961
24
* Certain corporate marketing, research and development and general and
administrative costs have not been allocated to the segments and have been
included in "Corporate and other".
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Although the cash position of Semotus has decreased at March 31, 2003 due to the
continued operating losses at the Company, this cash loss has been reduced
through the Company's Centralization and Consolidation Plan. Semotus believes
the cash loss will continue to be reduced through its Centralization and
Consolidation Plan.
The overall decrease in the cash position of Semotus at March 31, 2002 is due to
the continued operating losses at the Company. Cash continued to be spent on
operating resources and upgrading wireless products although a cash management
and cost reduction program has been implemented and has reduced the overall cash
loss by 57%.
The sources and uses of cash are summarized as follows:
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
--------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations $(2,021,665) $(4,332,467) $(8,507,433)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (15,889) 1,388,983 (558,941)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (210,941) (195,450) 1,279,762
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations 166,749 (134,007) (1,243,415)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (2,081,746) (3,272,941) (9,030,027)
Cash used in operating activities at March 31, 2003 consisted principally of a
net loss of $3,432,350 offset somewhat by non-cash charges of $1,313,596 for
depreciation and amortization, $593,259 for the amortization of a note
receivable, and $119,862 for a non-cash legal settlement. Further there was a
non-cash charge for the net loss from discontinued operations of $799,090 and a
gain on the cancellation of technology contracts of $628,927. Other operating
activities that used cash were reductions in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities of $190,008 and $130,361, respectively.
Cash used in operating activities at March 31, 2002 consisted principally of a
net loss of $18,444,478 offset somewhat by non-cash charges of $7,037,283 of
impairment charges, depreciation and amortization of $3,080,063 and stock based
compensation of $471,181. Other operating activities that provided cash were a
reduction in accounts receivable of $358,073, and an increase in deferred
revenue of $162,651 offset by a reduction in accounts payable of $86,816.
Cash used in the investing activities of $15,889 at March 31, 2003 resulted
principally from $16,949 of capital expenditures offset somewhat by $1,060 from
the sale of assets.
Cash provided from investing activities in 2003 of $1,388,983 at March 31, 2002
resulted principally from $1,063,571 of cash received, net of assets acquired
from the two companies acquired in the fiscal year, and $350,000 from the sale
of the Kinetidex technology.
Cash flows from financing activities produce a net decrease in cash of $210,941.
This resulted from the repurchase of preferred stock for $100,000 and from the
$122,479 of repayments of notes payable and capital leases offset slightly by
$11,538 in cash received from the exercise of warrants.
Cash flows provided by financing activities at March 31, 2002 produced a net
decrease in cash of $195,450 which resulted from $207,118 of repayments on notes
payable and capital leases offset slightly by $11,668 in cash received from the
exercise of stock options.
As of March 31, 2003, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $1,976,062 a
decrease of $2,081,746 from the prior year. Working capital decreased to
$1,464,645 from the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002.
As of March 31, 2002, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $4,057,808
(exclusive of restricted cash of $693,286), a decrease of $3,272,941 from the
prior year. Working capital decreased to $2,064,396 from the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2001.
The continued decrease in working capital is from the resources used in the
operations of Semotus as explained above, somewhat offset by cash produced by
the conversion of warrants and options into common stock. The Company has not
yet generated sufficient revenues to cover the costs of continued product
development and support, sales and marketing efforts and general and
administrative expenses. There are no material commitments for capital
expenditures at March 31, 2003. Primary commitments in FY2004 are
25
repayment of notes payable ($56,224), capital lease obligations ($23,731) and
operating lease obligation ($87,697).
At March 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company had a deferred tax asset of
approximately $13,862,275 and $11,753,500, respectively, principally arising
from net operating loss carryforwards available to offset future taxable income.
As management cannot determine that it is more likely than not that the Company
will realize the benefit of this asset, a 100% valuation allowance has been
established.
The following table discloses the Company's contractual commitments for future
periods. Long term commitments are comprised solely of operating leases and
capital leases (See Notes 12 and 20).
YEAR ENDING MARCH 31,
---------------------
2004 $ 103,948
2005 64,899
2006 25,350
2007 24,426
2008 6,210
----------
$ 224,833
==========
Management believes that it has adequate working capital for the next 12 months.
RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS:
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, " Rescission of FASB Statements No.
4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections."
SFAS No. 145 rescinded FASB No. 4 and 64 in relation to reporting gains and
losses from extinguishment of debt. The Statement amended SFAS No. 4 and 64 and
requires gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be classified as
extraordinary items only if they meet the criteria in Opinion 30. Applying the
provisions of Opinion 30 differentiates between normal recurring operations of a
company and transactions that are unusual or infrequent in nature. SFAS No. 145
also amended Statement No. 13, to the effect that sale-leaseback accounting for
certain lease modifications should be accounted for in the same manner as
sale-leaseback transactions.
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated
with Exit or Disposal Activities" ("SFAS 146"). SFAS 146 addresses significant
issues regarding the recognition, measurement, and reporting of costs that are
associated with exit and disposal activities, including restructuring activities
that are currently accounted for under EITF No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for
Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit and Activity
(including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." The scope of SFAS 146
also includes costs related to terminating a contract that is not a capital
lease and termination benefits that employees who are involuntarily terminated
receive under the terms of a one-time benefit arrangement that is not an ongoing
benefit arrangement or an individual deferred-compensation contract. SFAS 146 is
effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31,
2002. The Company's adoption of SFAS 146 on January 1, 2003 had no impact on the
Company's financial position or results of operations.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 ("FIN 45"),
"GUARANTOR'S ACCOUNTING AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR GUARANTEES, INCLUDING
INDIRECT GUARANTEES OF INDEBTEDNESS OF OTHERS, AN INTERPRETATION OF FASB
STATEMENTS NO. 5, 57, AND 107 AND RESCISSION OF FASB INTERPRETATION NO. 34." FIN
45 clarifies the requirements of FASB Statement No. 5, "ACCOUNTING FOR
Contingencies" relating to the guarantor's accounting for, and disclosure of the
issuance of certain types of guarantees. The disclosure provisions of the
Interpretation are effective for financial statements of interim or annual
reports that end after December 15, 2002, irrespective of the guarantor's
year-end. The Company's adoption of FIN 45 did not have a material impact in the
Company's financial position or results of operations.
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, Transition and Disclosure." SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123 and
requires prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements
about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the
effect of the method used on reported results. SFAS No. 148 is effective for
fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002 and is effective for interim periods
beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company's adoption of SFAS NO. 148 on
January 1, 2003 did not have a material effect on the Company's financial
position or results of operations.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51." This
interpretation addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable
interest entities as defined in the interpretation. The interpretation applies
immediately to variable interests in variable interest entities created or
obtained after January 31, 2003. The interpretation is applied to the enterprise
no later than the end of the first reporting period beginning after June 15,
2003. The application of this interpretation is not expected to have a material
effect on the Company's financial statements. The interpretation requires
certain disclosures in financial statements issued after January 31, 2003 if it
is reasonably possible that the
26
Company will consolidate or disclose information about variable interest
entities when the interpretation becomes effective.
In November 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued its final consensus on
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. This guidance is effective for
revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15,
2003 or alternatively, entities may elect to report the change in accounting as
a cumulative-effect adjustment. EITF 00-21 discusses criteria necessary to
determine when an arrangement may be viewed to have separate units of accounting
(and thus revenue) and when an arrangement should be viewed as a single unit of
accounting. The Company is currently reviewing how this might affect revenue
recognition for arrangements the Company could enter into that have multiple
deliverables.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We have limited exposure to financial market risks, including changes in
interest rates. At March 31, 2003, we had cash and cash equivalents of
$1,976,062. Cash and cash equivalents consisted of demand deposits and money
market accounts. Because of the cash equivalency of the money market accounts
and the liquidity thereof, there is no material exposure to interest rates for
these accounts.
The Company also has short-term notes payable in the amount of $56,224, at March
31, 2003. These notes are due and payable in less than one year. Because of the
short-term nature of the notes and the fixed rate on the notes, there is no
material exposure to changes in interest rates for these accounts. The Company
does not have any derivative or hedge instruments at March 31, 2003.
Semotus has a permanent engineering operation in Vancouver, B.C., Canada and
therefore has an exposure to the Canadian and U.S. dollar exchange rate. The
Company, in the ordinary course of its business, transfers funds to the Canadian
company and records the translation at the current exchange rate. The Company
records translation gains and losses in Comprehensive Income. At March 31, 2003,
the cumulative translation loss was $93,306. Given the relative stability of the
Canadian and U.S. dollar exchange rate, the Company has not deemed it necessary
to hedge this exposure. The Company does actively monitor the situation and as
of March 31, 2003 there has been a small but trending decline in the U.S. dollar
against the Canadian dollar. Should the trend continue, the Company would seek
to limit or hedge the exposure.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The financial statements and supplementary data of the Company and the report of
independent auditors thereon are listed in Item 16 of this Report and are
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
BDO Seidman, LLP served as our independent auditors from September 3, 1998 to
July 15, 2002. We had determined to change our independent auditors for fiscal
year 2003, and we dismissed BDO Seidman LLP on July 5, 2002. The decision to
change independent auditors was recommended by the Company's Management and the
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, and approved by a unanimous vote of
the full Board of Directors.
Our decision to change our independent auditors did not occur due to any
existing or previous accounting disagreements with BDO Seidman LLP, and BDO
Seidman LLP has expressed no disclaimer of opinion, adverse opinion,
qualification or limitation as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting
principles regarding our financial statements or the audit process, for the
fiscal years ended March 31, 2002 or 2001. Neither have there been any
accounting disagreements or reportable events within the meaning of Item
304(a)(1)(iv) and Item 304(a)(1)(v) of SEC Regulation S-K for those periods or
for the interim period from April 1, 2002 up to and including July 15, 2002. BDO
Seidman LLP had stated in its letter addressed to the SEC its concurrence with
the foregoing statements in this paragraph.
On July 15, 2002, we engaged Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP to serve as our
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2003. The decision to
engage Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP was recommended by the Company's management team
and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, and unanimously approved by
the full Board of Directors. We did not seek the advice of Burr, Pilger & Mayer
LLP on specific audit issues relating to the application of accounting
principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, the type of
audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements, or any matter
that was a reportable event prior to engagement of this firm.
PART III
We have omitted certain information from this Report that is required by Part
III. We intend to file a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A
with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to our annual meeting of
stockholders not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by
this Report, and such information is incorporated by reference herein.
27
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information required by this Item will be included in the Company's Proxy
Statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption
"Directors and Executive Officers" which will be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2003, and is incorporated by reference into this Item.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item will be included in the Company's Proxy
Statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption
"Executive Compensation" which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year ended March
31, 2003, and is incorporated by reference into this Item.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by this Item will be included in the Company's Proxy
Statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption
"Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" which will be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after
the close of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, and is incorporated by
reference into this Item.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Company's Proxy
Statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption "Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions" which will be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2003, and is incorporated by reference into this Item.
ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Within 90 days prior to the date of this report, we carried out an evaluation,
under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures. First, it should be noted that the design of any system
of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions, and there can be no
assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals. Further,
in designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, Semotus and
its management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in bringing to their
attention on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed in the reports
the Company files under the Exchange Act.
The CEO and CFO note that, since our last evaluation of internal controls, there
have been no significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
PART IV
ITEM 15. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
The information required by this Item will be included in the Company's Proxy
Statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption
"Principal Accountant Fees and Services" which will be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2003, and is incorporated by reference into this Item.
ITEM 16. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a)(1) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following financial statements required by this item are submitted in a
separate section beginning on page 35 of this report.
Independent Auditors Reports
Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended
March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
Consolidated Statements of Common Shareholders' Equity for the years ended March
31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
28
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2002
and 2001
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(a)(2) FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or
the required information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or
the notes thereto.
(a)(3) EXHIBITS.
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION LOCATION
- ------- ----------- --------
2.1 Agreement of Merger by and among Incorporated by reference to
Datalink.net, Inc., Acquisition Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's
Wireless, Inc., Cross Form 10QSB filed September 30,
Communications, Inc., and 2000.
Kathleen M. Wold made effective
as of July 20, 2000.
2.2 Agreement of Merger by and among Incorporated by reference to
Datalink.net, Inc., Medical Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrant's
Acquisition Wireless, Inc. Form 10QSB filed September 30,
Simkin Inc. and J. Daniel 2000.
Robinson made effective as
of September 12, 2000.
2.3 Agreement of Merger by and among Incorporated by reference to
Datalink.net, Inc., Wares Exhbit 2.3 to the Registrant's
Acquisition, Inc., ISS, Inc. Form 10QSB filed September 30,
and Stephen J. Casey made 2000.
effective as of October 10, 2000.
2.4 Agreement of Merger by and among Incorporated by reference to
Datalink.net, Inc., Five Star Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's
Advantage, Inc., Five Form 8-K filed January 12, 2001
Acquisition Inc. and Jeff
Gleckman dated December 8, 2000.
2.5 First Amendment to Merger Incorporated by reference to
Agreement by and among Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrant's
Datalink.net, Inc. Five Form 10QSB filed January 12,
Acquisition, Inc., Five Star 2001.
Advantage, Inc. and Jeff
Gleckman, dated as of December
28, 2000.
2.6 Merger Agreement by and among Incorporated by reference to
Datalink.net, Inc., Five Exhibit 2.3 to the Registrant's
Acquisition, Inc., Tehc-ni-comm, Form 10QSB filed January 12,
Inc., and Jeff Gleckman, dated 2001.
as of December 8, 2000.
2.7 First Amendment to Merger Incorporated by reference to
Agreement by and among Exhibit 2.4 to the Registrant's
Datalink.net, Inc., Five Form 10QSB filed January 12,
Acquisition, Inc., Tech-ni-comm, 2001.
Inc., and Jeff Gleckman, dated
as of December 28, 2000.
2.8 Merger Agreement by and among Incorporated by reference to
29
Semotus Solutions, Inc., Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's
WizShop.com, Inc. and Wiz Form 8-K filed May 17, 2001.
Acquisition, Inc.
2.9 Merger Agreement by and among Incorporated by reference to
Semotus Solutions, Inc., ADA Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's
Acquisition, Inc., Application Form 8-K filed May 30, 2001.
Design Associates, Inc. and John
Hibben.
2.10 Common Stock Purchase Agreement Incorporated by reference to
by and among Application Design Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's
Associates, Inc., John Hibben Form 10Q filed February 14, 2002.
and 2007978 Ontario, Inc. dated
January 18, 2002.
2.11 Agreement to Amend the Merger Incorporated by reference to
Agreement and Employment Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrant's
Agreement by and among Semotus Form 10Q filed February 14, 2002.
Solutions, Inc., Application
Design Associates, Inc. and John
Hibben dated January 18, 2002.
**2.12 Agreement to Amend the Stock Incorporated by reference to
Purchase Agreement and Terminate Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's
the Warrant by and among Form 8-K filed February 28, 2002.
Application Design Associates,
Inc., Semotus Solutions, Inc.
and 2007978 Ontario, Inc. dated
February 15, 2002.
2.13 Preferred Buy Back and Mutual Incorporated by reference to
Release Agreement by and Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's
among Semotus Solutions, Inc. Form 8-K filed January 13, 2003.
and Brown Simpson Partners
I, Ltd. dated December 31, 2002.
3.1 Articles of Incorporation. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit No. 2 to the Registrant's
Form 8-A filed on July 22, 1996
(No. 0-21069).
3.2 Bylaws of the Company. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit No. 3 to the Registrant's
Form 8-A filed on July 22, 1996
(No. 0-21069).
3.3 Amended and Restated Bylaws Incorporated by reference to
of the Company dated January Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's
24, 2000. Form 8-K Filed on February 17,
2000.
3.4 Certificate of Amendment to Incorporated by reference to
the Articles of Incorporation Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant's
dated February 17, 1998. Form 10-KSB for the year ended
March 31, 1998.
3.5 Certificate of Amendment to Incorporated by reference to
Articles of Incorporation Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant's
dated July 6, 1999. Form 8-A12B filed on
December 21, 1999.
30
3.6 Certificate of Amendment to Incorporated by reference to
Articles of Incorporation Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrant's
Dated January 12, 2001. Form 10-KSB for the year ended
March 31, 2001.
4.1 Specimen Stock Certificate. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's
Form 8-A-12B filed on December
21,1999.
4.2 Certificate of Designation Incorporated by reference to
of the Series B Convertible Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's
Preferred Stock. Form 8-K filed February 17, 2000.
4.3 Warrant to purchase up to Incorporated by reference to
375,000 shares of common stock Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's
issued to Brown Simpson Strategic Form 8-K filed February 17,
Fund, Ltd., dated February 9, 2000.
4.4 Warrant to purchase up to Incorporated by reference to
201,923 shares of common stock Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant's
issued to Brown Simpson Form 8-K filed February 17,
Strategic Fund, L.P., dated 2000.
February 9, 2000.
4.5 Warrant to purchase up to Incorporated by reference to
76,923 shares of common stock Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant's
issued to H.C. Wainwright & Co., Form 8-K filed February 17,
Inc., dated February 14, 2000. 2000.
*4.6 Warrant to purchase up to Incorporated by reference to
150,000 shares of common stock Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's
issued to Anthony N. LaPine, Form S-3 filed on April 21,
dated December 1, 1999. 2000.
**4.7 Warrant to Purchase 150,000 Incorporated by reference to
shares of Semotus' common stock Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's
issued to 2007978 Ontario, Inc. Form 10Q filed February 14, 2002.
Dated January 18, 2002.
4.8 Warrant to purchase up to 846,154 Incorporated by reference to
shares of common stock issued to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's
Brown Simpson Partners, I, Ltd. Form 8-K filed January 13, 2003.
dated December 31, 2002.
10.1 Agreement Concerning the Incorporated by reference to
Exchange of Common Stock Exhibit No. 10 to the Regis-
Between Datalink Systems trant's Form 8-K dated June 27,
Corporation and Datalink 1996.
Communications Corporation.
10.2 Application Software Purchase Incorporated by reference to
Agreement between Datalink Exhibit No. 10.1 to the Regis-
Systems Corporation and trant's Form 8-K dated August
Shalcor Investments. 26, 1996.
10.3 Management and Marketing Incorporated by reference to
Agreement between Datalink Exhibit No. 10.2 to the Regis-
Systems Corporation and trant's Form 8-K dated August
Shalcor Investments. 26, 1996.
31
10.4 8% Secured Term Note. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit No. 10.3 to the Regis-
trant's Form 8-K dated August
26, 1996.
*10.5 Employment Agreement with Anthony Incorporated by reference to
LaPine dated May 1, 1996. Exhibit 10.6 to the Regis-
trant's Form 10-KSB for the
year ended March 31, 1997.
10.6 Application Software Purchase Incorporated by reference to
Agreement between Datalink Exhibit 10.1 to the Regis-
Systems Corporation and 605285 trant's Form 8-K dated May 6,
Ontario Inc. 1997.
10.7 Management and Marketing Incorporated by reference to
Agreement between Datalink Exhibit 10.2 to the Regis-
Systems Corporation and 605285 trant's Form 8-K dated May 6,
Ontario. 1997.
10.8 6% Secured Term Note. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit No. 10.3 to the
Registrant's Form 8-K dated
May 6, 1997.
*10.9 Loan Forgiveness Agreement with Incorporated by reference to
Anthony LaPine dated January 19, Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant's
2000. Form 10KSB filed June 29, 2000.
*10.10 Secured Promissory Note with Incorporated by reference to
Anthony LaPine dated Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant's
February 29, 2000. Form 10KSB filed June 29, 2000.
10.11 Option to Repurchase Technology Incorporated by reference to
Agreement with 605285 Ontario Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant's
Inc. dated June 14, 2000. Form 10KSB filed June 29, 2000.
10.12 Termination and Sale Agreement Incorporated by reference to
by and among Micromedix, Inc. Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant's
Semotus Solutions, Inc. and Form 10Q filed August 15, 2001.
Simkin, Inc. dated May 31, 2001.
*10.13 Loan Forgiveness Agreement with Incorporated by reference to
Anthony LaPine dated March 29, Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant's
2002. Form 10K filed July 1, 2002.
16.1 Letter from BDO Seidman, LLP Incorporated by reference to
dated July 17, 2002. Exhibit 16.1 to the Registrant's
Form 8-K filed on July 22, 2002.
16.2 Letter from BDO Seidman, LLP Incorporated by reference to
dated August 26, 2002. Exhibit 16.1 to the Registrant's
Form 8-K filed August 26, 2002.
21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant. Filed electronically herewith.
23.1 Consent of Burr, Pilger & Mayer, Filed electronically herewith.
LLP.
23.2 Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP. Filed electronically herewith.
32
99.1 Securities Purchase Agreement, Incorporated by reference to
dated as of February 9, 2000, Exhibit 99.1 to the Regis-
by and among the Company, Brown trant's 8-K Filed on February
Simpson Strategic Growth Fund, 17, 2000.
Ltd. and Brown Simpson Strategic
Growth Fund.
99.2 Registration Rights Agreement, Incorporated by reference to
dated as of February 9, 2000, Exhibit 99.2 to the Regis-
by and among the Company, Brown trant's 8-K Filed on February
Simpson Strategic Growth Fund, 17, 2000.
Ltd. and Brown Simpson Strategic
Growth Fund, L.P.
99.3 Registration Rights and Lock-Up Incorporated by reference to
Agreement by and among Semotus Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrant's
Solutions, Inc. and John Hibben. Form 8-K filed May 30, 2001.
99.4 Consent of Anthony LaPine Filed electronically herewith.
pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.5 Consent of Charles, K. Dargan, II Filed electronically herewith.
pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
- ----------
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
** This Warrant was cancelled, ab initio, and effectively replaced with 150,000
common stock options under the Company's 1996 Stock Option Plan.
(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. The Company filed two Current Reports on Form 8-K
during the fourth quarter ended March 31, 2003.
An 8-K was filed on January 13, 2003 with respect to the repurchase by Semotus
from Brown Simpson of all of the outstanding shares of the Company's Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock and the settlement and mutual release related to
Brown Simpson's anti-dilution claim.
An 8-K was filed on February 14, 2003 with respect to its financial results for
the third quarter ended December 31, 2002.
(c) EXHIBITS. The exhibits required by this Item are listed under Item 14(a)(3).
(d) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SCHEDULES. The financial statement schedules required
by this Item are listed under Item 14(a)(2).
33
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE(S)
Reports of Independent Certified Public Accountants ...................... 35
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets, March 31, 2003 and 2002 ................ 37
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Loss for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 .............. 38
Consolidated Statements of Common Shareholders' Equity
for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 ................... 39
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years
ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 ................................. 41
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements .......................... 43
34
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Semotus Solutions, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Semotus
Solutions, Inc., and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2003, and the related
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, shareholders'
equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform our audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Semotus Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2003 and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then
ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements,
effective April 1, 2002, the Company changed its method of accounting for
goodwill in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, No.
142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets."
/s/ Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP
Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP
Palo Alto, California
June 2, 2003
35
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS OF SEMOTUS SOLUTIONS, INC.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Semotus
Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2002, and the related
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, common
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period
ended March 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform our audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Semotus Solutions,
lnc. and subsidiaries as of March 3l, 2002, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended March
31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP
San Jose, California
June 3, 2002
36
SEMOTUS SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31 March 31
ASSETS 2003 2002
------------ ------------
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash of $693,286 at
March 31, 2002) $ 1,976,062 $ 4,751,094
Trade receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$77,090 at March 31, 2003 and $66,000 at March 31, 2002) 140,646 159,018
Income and GST tax receivable -- 3,823
Other receivables -- 60,395
Prepaid expenses 52,161 132,622
Current assets of discontinued operations -- 345,755
Current assets held for sale 298,200 150,340
------------ ------------
Total current assets 2,467,069 5,603,047
Property and equipment, net 342,614 622,671
Capitalized contract, net -- 576,958
GMP intellectual property, net -- 1,000,000
Goodwill, net 1,430,141 1,430,141
Non-current assets of discontinued operations -- 34,383
Non-current assets held for sale 408,732 1,069,863
------------ ------------
Total assets $ 4,648,556 $ 10,337,063
============ ============
LIABILITIES:
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable $ 392,826 $ 582,834
Accrued vacation 69,808 91,768
Other accrued liabilities 79,999 188,771
Notes payable 56,224 693,286
Current portion of capital lease obligations 23,731 53,428
Current portion of advances on technology sales -- 269,109
Current portion of deferred revenue 79,119 1,105,597
Current liabilities of discontinued operations -- 300,977
Current liabilities related to assets held for sale 300,717 252,881
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 1,002,424 3,538,651
Capital lease obligation, net of current portion 15,189 40,310
Advances on technology sales, net of current portion -- 566,542
Non-current liabilities related to assets held for sale 321,216 214,623
------------ ------------
Total liabilities 1,338,829 4,360,126
------------ ------------
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 20 and 22)
PREFERRED SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Convertible preferred stock, Series B: $0.001 par value; $13.00 liquidation value;
authorized: 5,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding: none at March 31, 2003 and
469,231 at March 31, 2002 (Note 13) -- 469
Additional paid-in capital -- 5,681,987
------------ ------------
Total preferred shareholders' equity -- 5,682,456
------------ ------------
COMMON SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock: $0.01 par value; authorized: 50,000,000 shares; issued and
outstanding: 19,275,211 at March 31, 2003 and 17,200,784 at March 31, 2002
192,752 172,008
Additional paid-in capital 66,163,351 60,396,089
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (93,306) (142,360)
Notes receivable - related parties (91,281) (701,817)
Accumulated deficit (62,861,789) (59,429,439)
------------ ------------
Total common shareholders' equity 3,309,727 294,481
------------ ------------
Total liabilities, preferred and common shareholders' equity $ 4,648,556 $ 10,337,063
============ ============
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
37
SEMOTUS SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Year Ended March 31,
--------------------
2003 2002 2001
------------ ------------ ------------
Revenues:
Wireless services $ 1,293,801 $ 1,305,347 $ 1,731,948
Enterprise and commerce sales 1,005,060 1,114,481 --
Professional and related services 45,390 111,590 178,246
------------ ------------ ------------
Total revenues 2,344,251 2,531,418 1,910,194
------------ ------------ ------------
Cost of sales:
Wireless services 347,312 511,837 985,305
Enterprise and commerce sales 576,959 654,885 --
Professional and related services 4,972 28,556 49,298
------------ ------------ ------------
Total cost of sales 929,243 1,195,278 1,034,603
------------ ------------ ------------
Gross profit 1,415,008 1,336,140 875,591
Operating expenses:
(Exclusive of depreciation and amortization and
stock, option and warrant expense)
Research and development 719,965 1,010,720 1,187,348
Sales and marketing 1,027,366 1,849,582 4,098,228
General and administrative 2,238,825 3,203,131 4,218,224
Impairment of goodwill -- 3,617,283 --
Impairment of intangible assets -- 3,420,000 --
Depreciation and amortization:
Research and development 75,516 127,975 97,606
General and administrative 1,238,080 2,952,088 1,688,908
------------ ------------ ------------
1,313,596 3,080,063 1,786,514
Stock, option and warrant expense:
Sales and marketing -- 88,000 78,750
General and administrative 52,455 408,181 523,182
------------ ------------ ------------
52,455 496,181 601,932
Total operating expenses 5,352,207 16,676,960 11,892,246
------------ ------------ ------------
Operating loss from continuing operations (3,937,199) (15,340,820) (11,016,655)
Net interest income 52,301 269,210 671,915
Other income 1,123,056 289,685 431,525
------------ ------------ ------------
Total interest and other income 1,175,357 558,895 1,103,440
------------ ------------ ------------
Net loss from continuing operations (2,761,842) (14,781,925) (9,913,215)
Net loss from discontinued operations (Note 5) (799,090) (3,662,553) (1,380,166)
Gain from disposal of discontinued operations 128,582 -- --
------------ ------------ ------------
Net loss (3,432,350) (18,444,478) (11,293,381)
Other comprehensive income (loss) - Translation adjustment
49,054 (39,824) (21,136)
------------ ------------ ------------
Comprehensive loss $ (3,383,296) $(18,484,302) $(11,314,517)
============ ============ ============
Net loss per common share from continuing operations:
Basic $ (0.15) $ (0.87) $ (0.65)
Diluted $ (0.15) $ (0.87) $ (0.65)
Net loss per common share from discontinued operations:
Basic $ (0.04) $ (0.22) $ (0.09)
Diluted $ (0.04) $ (0.22) $ (0.09)
Net loss per common share:
Basic $ (0.19) $ (1.09) $ (0.74)
Diluted $ (0.19) $ (1.09) $ (0.74)
Weighted average shares used in per share calculation, basic
and diluted 18,039,262 16,975,660 15,199,895
============ ============ ============
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
38
SEMOTUS SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMMON SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock Additional
------------------------------ Paid-In
Shares Amount Capital
------------ ------------ ------------
Balances at March 31, 2000 13,685,788 $ 136,858 $ 36,789,337
Common stock issued for:
Options exercised 133,788 1,338 187,754
Services rendered 128,808 1,288 207,367
Exercise of warrants for cash 903,282 9,033 1,842,313
Cashless exercise of warrants 39,204 392 (392)
Conversion of series B preferred to common stock 600,000 6,000 3,627,045
Issuance of stock for acquisitions 412,498 4,125 5,153,925
Warrants issued for jointly developed technology - GMP -- -- 6,800,000
Warrants issued for option to repurchase technology -- -- 217,000
Compensation associated with stock options and warrants
granted for services -- -- 393,277
Amortization of notes receivable, net -- -- --
Translation adjustment -- -- --
Net loss -- -- --
------------ ------------ ------------
Balances at March 31, 2001 15,903,368 159,034 55,217,626
Issuance of stock for acquisitions 964,940 9,649 4,673,937
Issuance of stock for services rendered 473,936 4,739 391,288
Issuance of stock due to exercise of options 8,540 86 11,584
Compensation associated with stock options and warrants
granted for services -- -- 100,154
Redeemed stock due to contract cancellations (150,000) (1,500) 1,500
Amortization of note receivable, net -- -- --
Foreign currency translation adjustment -- -- --
Net loss -- -- --
------------ ------------ ------------
Balances at March 31, 2002 17,200,784 172,008 60,396,089
Issuance of stock for price guarantee under merger
agreement 863,403 8,634 (8,634)
Issuance of stock for liability settlement 57,178 572 21,124
Issuance of stock due to exercise of warrants 1,153,846 11,538 --
Repurchase of series B preferred stock -- -- 5,582,456
Reprice of warrants due to lawsuit settlement -- -- 119,862
Amortization and forgiveness of note receivable -- -- --
Foreign currency translation adjustment -- -- --
Amortization of deferred compensation -- -- 52,454
Net loss -- -- --
Balances at March 31, 2003 19,275,211 $ 192,752 $ 66,163,351
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
39
SEMOTUS SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMMON SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED)
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Notes Accumulated
Loss Receivable Deficit Total
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Balances at March 31, 2000 $ (81,400) $ (1,348,747) $(29,691,580) $ 5,804,468
Common stock issued for:
Options exercised -- -- -- 189,092
Services rendered -- -- -- 208,655
Exercise of warrants for cash -- -- -- 1,851,346
Cashless exercise of warrants -- -- -- --
Conversion of series B preferred to common
stock -- -- -- 3,633,045
Issuance of stock for acquisitions -- -- -- 5,158,050
Warrants issued for jointly developed
technology - GMP -- -- -- 6,800,000
Warrants issued for option to repurchase
technology -- -- -- 217,000
Compensation associated with stock options
and warrants granted for services -- -- -- 393,277
Amortization of notes receivable, net -- 242,135 -- 242,135
Translation adjustment (21,136) -- -- (21,136)
Net loss -- -- (11,293,381) (11,293,381)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Balances at March 31, 2001 (102,536) (1,106,612) (40,984,961) 13,182,551
Issuance of stock for acquisitions -- -- -- 4,683,586
Issuance of stock for services rendered -- -- -- 396,027
Issuance of stock due to exercise of options -- -- -- 11,670
Compensation associated with stock options
and warrants granted for services -- -- -- 100,154
Redeemed stock due to contract cancellations -- -- -- --
Amortization of note receivable, net -- 404,795 -- 404,795
Foreign currency translation adjustment (39,824) -- -- (39,824)
Net loss -- -- (18,444,478) (18,444,478)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Balances at March 31, 2002 (142,360) (701,817) (59,429,439) 294,481
Issuance of stock for price guarantee under
merger agreement -- -- -- --
Issuance of stock for liability settlement -- -- -- 21,696
Issuance of stock due to exercise of warrants -- -- -- 11,538
Repurchase of series B preferred stock -- -- -- 5,582,456
Reprice of warrant due to lawsuit settlement -- -- -- 119,862
Amortization and forgiveness of note receivable -- 610,536 -- 610,536
Foreign currency translation adjustment 49,054 -- -- 49,054
Amortization of deferred compensation -- -- -- 52,454
Net loss -- -- (3,432,350) (3,432,350)
Balances at March 31, 2003 $ (93,306) $ (91,281) $(62,861,789) $ 3,309,727
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
40
SEMOTUS SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended March 31,
--------------------
2003 2002 2001
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss $ (3,432,350) $(18,444,478) $(11,293,381)
Loss from discontinued operations 799,090 3,662,553 1,380,166
Gain from disposition of discontinued operations (128,582) -- --
Net loss from continuing operations (2,761,842) (14,781,925) (9,913,215)
Foreign currency translation adjustment 49,054 (39,824) (21,136)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations
to net cash used in operating activities of continuing
operations:
Depreciation and amortization 1,313,596 3,080,063 1,786,514
Compensation expense related to stock issued for services
-- 371,027 208,655
------------
Compensation expense related to options/warrants issued
for services 52,455 100,154 393,277
Net amortization of contract income (423,414) (606,586) --
Amortization of advances on technology sales (206,723) (306,908) (371,052)
Gain on disposition of technology advances (628,927) -- --
Amortization and forgiveness of notes receivable, net 593,259 315,799 242,135
Impairment of goodwill -- 3,617,283 --
Impairment of GMP & software -- 3,420,000
Net loss from sale of assets 719 29,010 --
Non-cash settlement of liabilities 173,669 14,642 --
Non-cash compensation for services -- -- (151,000)
Changes in assets and liabilities net of acquired assets
and liabilities due to acquisitions:
Accounts and other receivables 82,500 358,073 (75,423)
Prepaid expenses and other assets 80,462 2,634 61,512
Accounts payable (190,008) (86,816) (489,764)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities (130,361) (32,425) (87,199)
Deferred revenue (26,104) 162,651 (90,737)
Advances on technology sales -- 50,681 --
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash used in operating activities of continuing
operations (2,021,665) (4,332,467) (8,507,433)
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of property and equipment (16,949) (24,588) (426,439)
Cost of the applicable fiscal year's acquisitions, net of
cash acquired -- (132,502)
Sale of property and equipment 1,060 -- --
Cash received from applicable fiscal year's acquisitions,
net -- 1,063,571 --
Sale of Kinetidex technology -- 350,000 --
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of
continuing operations (15,889) 1,388,983 (558,941)
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayments of notes payable (78,869) (154,398) (50,830)
Repayments of capital lease obligations (43,610) (52,720) (15,624)
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants 11,538 11,668 2,040,438
Repurchase of preferred stock (Note 13) (100,000) -- --
Restricted cash for note payable -- -- (694,222)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of
continuing operations (210,941) (195,450) 1,279,762
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations
166,749 (134,007) (1,243,415)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (2,081,746) (3,272,941) (9,030,027)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 4,057,808 7,330,749 16,360,776
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 1,976,062 $ 4,057,808 $ 7,330,749
============ ============ ============
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
41
SEMOTUS SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
Year Ended March 31,
--------------------
2003 2002 2001
------------ ------------ ------------
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURE:
Cash paid for interest $ 25,809 $ 68,130 $ 19,071
============ ============ ============
Cash paid for income taxes $ 4,341 $ 9,015 $ 10,557
============ ============ ============
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH
INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Non-cash purchase consideration for the acquisition of
ISS, Inc. through the issuance of common stock $ -- $ -- $ 1,671,750
============ ============ ============
Non-cash purchase consideration for the acquisition of
Cross Communications, Inc. and Simkin, Inc. through
the issuance of common stock $ -- $ -- $ 2,753,900
============ ============ ============
Non-cash purchase consideration for the acquisition of
Wizshop.com, Inc. and Application Design Associates,
Inc. through the issuance of common stock $ -- $ 4,665,500 $ --
============ ============ ============
Additional non-cash purchase consideration paid to
shareholder of Cross Communications, Inc. pursuant to
the first year performance criteria of the Merger
Agreement $ -- $ 18,086 $ --
============ ============ ============
Common stock issued for liabilities $ 162,783 $ 101,036 $ --
============ ============ ============
Preferred stock converted to common stock $ -- $ -- $ 3,633,045
============ ============ ============
Cashless exercise of warrants $ -- $ -- $ 392
============ ============ ============
Consideration in connection with 40,000 common stock
warrants to obtain option to repurchase technology $ -- $ -- $ 217,000
============ ============ ============
Issuance of 800,000 common stock warrants to obtain GMP
intellectual property $ -- $ -- $ 6,800,000
============ ============ ============
Property and equipment purchased through the issuance
of capital leases $ -- $ 110,119 $ 43,539
============ ============ ============
Warrants issued as part of the consideration for
repurchase of series B preferred stock $ 90,497 $ -- $ --
============ ============ ============
Reclassification of accounts payable to notes payable $ 135,093 $ -- $ --
============ ============ ============
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
42
SEMOTUS SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. FORMATION AND BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY:
Semotus(TM) Solutions, Inc. ("Semotus " or the "Company"), changed its named
from Datalink.net, Inc. as of January 11, 2001. The Company, originally Datalink
Systems Corporation, was formed under the laws of the State of Nevada on June
18, 1996. On June 27, 1996, the Company went public through an acquisition of a
public corporation, Datalink Communications Corporation ("DCC"), which was
previously Lord Abbott, Inc., a Colorado corporation formed in 1986. In the June
27, 1996 acquisition of DCC, the Company issued 3,293,064 shares of its $0.01
par value Common Stock to the holders of 100% of the outstanding Common Stock of
DCC, and DCC became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. As a part of the
transaction, the Company acquired a Canadian corporation, DSC Datalink Systems
Corporation, incorporated in Vancouver, British Columbia, now named Semotus
Systems, Corp.
Semotus is a leading provider of enterprise application software connecting
employees to critical business systems, information, and processes. Semotus
helps mobile employees make better and faster decisions, increase customer
satisfaction, and improve efficiencies in their business processes for shorter
sales and service cycles. The Company's products serve such vertical markets as
workforce automation and financial services. Semotus' enterprise application
software provides mobility, convenience, and efficiency and improves
profitability.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS:
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Semotus Solutions, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The consolidated balance sheets as
of March 31, 2003 and 2002, the consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive loss for the years ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, the
consolidated statements of common shareholders' equity for the years ended March
31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the
years ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, have been prepared by the Company,
with an audit and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-K and
Regulation S-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (including normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
included. The Company believes that the disclosures provided are adequate to
make the information presented not misleading.
Management believes, after discontinuing all operations that were unprofitable,
that the remaining continuing operations are sustainable and that the Company
will have enough cash to maintain its operations over the next twelve months.
Although those operations range from slightly cash positive to cash negative on
a monthly basis, the overall trend toward positive cash flow is continuing.
Further, with the trend toward an economic recovery, the Company's operations
should be augmented in the current fiscal year. The continued operation of the
Company is dependant on increasing sales and achieving profitability and/or
obtaining sufficient long-term financing.
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
The following summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist
the reader in understanding and evaluating the consolidated financial
statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles and have been applied consistently in all material respects.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION:
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
its wholly owned subsidiaries: Semotus Systems Corporation (Canadian
subsidiary), Cross Communications, Inc., Simkin, Inc. and WizShop, Inc. The
other subsidiaries have been closed or sold and are now in discontinued
operations: Wares on the Web, Inc. (Wares), Five Star Advantage, Inc. (Five
Star) and Application Design Associates, Inc. (ADA). All significant
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Operations of the Canadian subsidiary consist mainly of research and development
and engineering on behalf of the parent. All other operating subsidiaries
generate revenues from the sales of products and services.
USE OF ESTIMATES:
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
43
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of
three months or less or money market funds from substantial financial
institutions to be cash equivalents. The Company places substantially all of its
cash and cash equivalents in interest bearing demand deposit accounts with one
financial institution.
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK:
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of
risk consist principally of trade and other receivables.
In the ordinary course of business trade receivables are with a large number of
customers, dispersed across a wide North American geographic base. The Company
extends credit to its customers in the ordinary course of business and
periodically reviews the credit levels extended to customers, estimates the
collectibility and creates an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company does
not require cash collateral or other security to support customer receivables.
Provision is made for estimated losses on uncollectible accounts.
We estimate our allowance for doubtful accounts by applying estimated loss
percentages against our aging of accounts receivable balances. The estimated
loss percentages are updated periodically and are based on our historical
write-off experience, net of recoveries. Changes to allowances may be required
if the financial condition of our customers improves or deteriorates or if we
adjust our credit standards for new customers, thereby resulting in write-off
patterns that differ from historical experience. Historically, changes to our
estimated loss percentages have not been material.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the related assets, generally three to seven years.
Amortization on capital leases is over two years and is incorporated in
depreciation and amortization expense in the statement of operations.
The carrying value of property and equipment is assessed annually or when
factors indicating an impairment are present. In accordance with SFAS No. 144,
we review our property, plant, and equipment for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable.
Impairment reviews require a comparison of the estimated future undiscounted
cash flows to the carrying value of the asset. If the total of the undiscounted
cash flows is less than the carrying value, an impairment charge is recorded for
the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying value of the
asset.
LONG-TERM ASSETS / GOODWILL
Historically, long-term assets, such as intellectual property rights and
goodwill were amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected economic life
of the assets. The expected useful life of those assets was five years, and was
adjusted to one year as of April 1, 2002. The Company has adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 141 "Business Combinations" and SFAS 142
"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" as of April 1, 2002. Accordingly, Semotus
no longer amortizes goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite useful
life and instead assesses potential impairments of such intangible assets and
goodwill. The effect of the adoption of SFAS 142 resulted in the net loss for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 being smaller by $432,541 due to not
amortizing goodwill. Management has determined that the remaining goodwill of
$1,430,141 is fairly valued using the impairment tests as described in SFAS 144
and SFAS 142, which includes discounted cash flow analysis and comparable
company analysis. This remaining amount of goodwill consists entirely of one of
the Company's wireless enterprise application software product lines, the
HipLink family of software products, which is generating current revenue and
cash flow.
The following table presents the impact of SFAS 142 on net loss and net loss per
share had SFAS 142 been applicable for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002 and
2001.
FISCAL YEARS ENDED
------------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
------------ ------------ ------------
Reported net loss $ (3,432,350) $(18,444,478) $(11,293,381)
Amortization of goodwill -- 1,855,407 591,326
------------ ------------ ------------
Adjusted net loss (3,432,350) (16,589,071) (10,702,055)
============ ============ ============
Reported net loss per share - basic and diluted $ (0.19) $ (1.09) $ (0.74)
Adjusted net loss per share - basic and diluted $ (0.19) $ (0.98) $ (0.70)
44
Acquisitions which have been accounted for under the purchase method of
accounting include the results of operations of the acquired business from the
date of acquisition. Net assets of the companies acquired are recorded at their
fair value to the Company at the date of acquisition.
CAPITALIZED CONTRACT
In prior years, Semotus capitalized the fair value of contracts acquired in
business combinations as required by Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB)
16 "Business Combinations". Fair value was determined by estimating the cost
expected to be incurred in order to perform the obligations under the contract
plus adding a reasonable profit associated with the performance effort. The
capitalized cost was amortized into cost of revenue as revenues were recognized
over the length of the contract, two years, and was fully amortized at March 31,
2003.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION:
Exchange adjustments resulting from foreign currency transactions are generally
recognized in operations. Adjustments resulting from translation of financial
statements are reflected as a separate component of shareholders' equity. Net
foreign currency transaction gains or losses are not material in any of the
years presented.
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION:
The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation" and SFAS 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, Transition and Disclosure." Under this standard, companies are
encouraged, but not required, to adopt the fair value method of accounting for
employee stock-based transactions. The fair value method is required for all
stock-based compensation issued to non-employees, including consultants and
advisors. Under the fair value method, compensation cost relating to issuances
of stock options, warrants and appreciation rights is measured at the grant date
based on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the service period,
which is usually the vesting period. Companies are permitted to continue to
account for employee stock-based transactions under APB No. 25, "Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees," but are required to disclose pro forma net loss,
stock compensation cost and earnings per share as if the fair value method has
been adopted. The Company has elected to continue to account for stock based
compensation under APB No. 25. Certain options, which have been repriced, are
subject to the variable plan requirements of APB No. 25, that requires the
Company to record compensation expense for changes in the fair value of the
Company's common stock.
The Company has adopted the disclosure only provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 ("SFAS 123"), Accounting for Stock Based
Compensation. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for these
options. Had compensation expense been determined based on the fair value at the
grant dates for awards under these plans consistent with the method of SFAS 123,
the Company's net loss in fiscal years ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 would
have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
2003 2002 2001
------------ ------------ ------------
Net loss as reported $ (3,432,350) $(18,444,478) $(11,293,381)
Compensation Expense (48,253) (1,649,416) (522,296)
Net loss Pro forma (3,480,603) (20,093,894) (11,815,677)
Net loss per share
As reported, basic and diluted (0.19) (1.09) (0.74)
Pro forma net loss, basic and diluted (0.19) (1.18) (0.78)
The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions used for
grants under the Plan in 2003, 2002 and 2001:
2003 2002 2001
------------ ------------ ------------
Expected dividend $ -- $ -- $ --
Expected life of option 4 years 4 years 4 years
Risk-free interest rate 3.46% 3.71% - 4.63% 5.0% - 6.5%
Expected volatility 102% - 204% 87% - 108% 70% - 295%
The above pro forma disclosures are not likely to be representative of the
effects on reported net income (loss) for future years.
45
INCOME TAXES:
Deferred income taxes have been recorded for the tax consequences in future
years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their
financial reporting amounts using enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates
applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect
taxable income. A 100% valuation allowance has been provided as management is
unable to determine that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets
will be realized.
REVENUE RECOGNITION:
The Company recognizes revenues in each of its lines of business based upon
contract terms and completion of the sales process.
Wireless services: revenue is generated from wireless services provided to
enterprises and consumers. The revenue is from recurring monthly charges based
on utilization fees, transaction fees, and maintenance and service charges. In
the financial consumer business, the Company also receives a small revenue
stream from pager rentals. Revenues are recognized over the service period and
any revenue that relates to more than one service period is recognized ratably
over those service periods. In the work force automation business, wireless
software is delivered to the customer and revenue is recognized upon delivery,
assuming no significant obligations remain.
Enterprise and commerce sales and service: revenue is generated from online
sales, advertising, sponsorships and hosting fees and other services. Revenue is
recognized upon a completed sale and shipment of a product (e-fulfillment
transaction) and for online advertising and sponsorships, revenue is recognized
when payment is received. Hosting fees and other services, such as licensing,
are recognized ratably over the service period.
Professional and related services: revenue is generated from software
engineering and sales and from training and consultation. Revenue is recognized
when the engineering, training or consultation work has been performed in
accordance with the contract.
COST OF REVENUE:
The cost of revenue for the wireless services line of business principally
includes costs to obtain data feeds from various exchanges, costs of engineering
development directed to specifically identified products, costs of servicing and
hosting customer products, costs for pager rental or depreciation and pager
airtime for those customers without their own pagers, and certain telephone,
computer and other direct operational costs.
The cost of revenue for the enterprise and commerce sales and service line of
business includes the purchase cost of the products, and costs of servicing and
hosting. Any engineering costs directly related to the products offered are also
included as a cost of revenue.
The cost of revenue for professional and related services is primarily personnel
costs for engineering, training and consulting.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and payables are
reasonable estimates of their fair value due to their short-term nature.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURES:
Expenditures related to research, design and development of products and
services are charged to product development and engineering expenses as
incurred. Software development costs are capitalized beginning when a product's
technological feasibility has been established and ending when a product is
available for general release to customers. At March 31, 2002 and 2003 there
were no capitalized software development costs as the Company expensed the
remaining amounts at fiscal year end 2002.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In April 2002, Semotus adopted SFAS 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", which requires that one accounting model be used
for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, whether previously held and
used or newly acquired, and by broadening the presentation of discontinued
operations to include more disposal transactions. This statement requires that
those long-lived assets be measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair
value less cost to sell, whether reported in continuing operations or in
discontinued operations. The Company evaluates long-lived assets,
46
excluding goodwill and identifiable intangible assets with indefinite useful
lives, for impairment in accordance with SFAS 144 whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset my not be
recoverable. Accordingly, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, the
operations of Five Star, Wares and ADA have been recorded in discontinued
operations. Five Star and Wares were part of the Enterprise and Commerce Sales
segment. ADA was the logistics segment. The amount of any impairment is measured
as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the impaired
asset. Fair value is determined generally based on discounted cash flows. Assets
to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair
value, less costs to sell. The assets from the discontinued operations including
those assets held for sale have been recorded at their fair market value prior
to disposition.
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE:
Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed
using the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares, if
dilutive, outstanding during the period. Common equivalent shares consist of the
incremental common shares issuable upon conversion of convertible preferred
stock (using the if-converted method) and shares issuable upon the exercise of
stock options and warrants (using the treasury stock method) (See Note 19,
"Earnings Per Share (EPS) Disclosures").
Outstanding common shares and per share amounts have been adjusted for a 2 for 1
stock split, which was effective April 27, 2000.
RECLASSIFICATIONS:
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial statements
to conform to the current year presentation.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):
The Company's policy in reporting comprehensive income is as defined in SFAS
130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" and includes all changes in equity (net
assets) during a period from non-owner sources. The Company excludes from net
income (loss) foreign currency translation adjustments, which are included in
comprehensive income. For the periods presented in this Form 10K, foreign
currency translation adjustments is the only item which affects the Company's
comprehensive income.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, " Rescission of FASB Statements No.
4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections."
SFAS No. 145 rescinded FASB No. 4 and 64 in relation to reporting gains and
losses from extinguishment of debt. The Statement amended SFAS No. 4 and 64 and
requires gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be classified as
extraordinary items only if they meet the criteria in Opinion 30. Applying the
provisions of Opinion 30 differentiates between normal recurring operations of a
company and transactions that are unusual or infrequent in nature. SFAS No. 145
also amended Statement No. 13, to the effect that sale-leaseback accounting for
certain lease modifications should be accounted for in the same manner as
sale-leaseback transactions.
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated
with Exit or Disposal Activities" ("SFAS 146"). SFAS 146 addresses significant
issues regarding the recognition, measurement, and reporting of costs that are
associated with exit and disposal activities, including restructuring activities
that are currently accounted for under EITF No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for
Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit and Activity
(including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." The scope of SFAS 146
also includes costs related to terminating a contract that is not a capital
lease and termination benefits that employees who are involuntarily terminated
receive under the terms of a one-time benefit arrangement that is not an ongoing
benefit arrangement or an individual deferred-compensation contract. SFAS 146 is
effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31,
2002. The Company's adoption of SFAS 146 on January 1, 2003 had no impact on the
Company's financial position or results of operations.
In November 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued its final consensus on
EITF 00-21, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables". This guidance is
effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning
after June 15, 2003 or alternatively, entities may elect to report the change in
accounting as a cumulative-effect adjustment. EITF 00-21 discusses criteria
necessary to determine when an arrangement may be viewed to have separate units
of accounting (and thus revenue) and when an arrangement should be viewed as a
single unit of accounting. The Company is currently reviewing how this might
affect revenue recognition for arrangements the Company could enter into that
have multiple deliverables.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation NO. 45 ("FIN 45"),
"Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure
47
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and Rescission
of FASB Interpretation No. 34." FIN 45 clarifies the requirements of FASB
Statement No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies" relating to the guarantor's
accounting for, and disclosure of the issuance of certain types of guarantees.
The disclosure provisions of the Interpretation are effective for financial
statements of interim or annual reports that end after December 15, 2002,
irrespective of the guarantor's year-end. The Company's adoption of FIN 45 did
not have a material impact in the Company's financial position or results of
operations.
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, Transition and Disclosure." SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123 and
requires prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements
about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the
effect of the method used on reported results. SFAS No. 148 is effective for
fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002 and is effective for interim periods
beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company's adoption of SFAS NO. 148 on
January 1, 2003 did not have a material effect on the Company's financial
position or results of operations.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51." This
interpretation addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable
interest entities as defined in the interpretation. The interpretation applies
immediately to variable interests in variable interest entities created or
obtained after January 31, 2003. The interpretation is applied to the enterprise
no later than the end of the first reporting period beginning after June 15,
2003. The application of this interpretation is not expected to have a material
effect on the Company's financial statements. The interpretation requires
certain disclosures in financial statements issued after January 31, 2003 if it
is reasonably possible that the Company will consolidate or disclose information
about variable interest entities when the interpretation becomes effective. As
of March 31, 2003, the Company does not have any variable interest entities.
4. ACQUISITIONS
The Company adopted SFAS 141 "Business Combinations" and SFAS 142 "Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets" as of April 1, 2002. Accordingly, Semotus no longer
amortizes intangible assets with an indefinite useful life or goodwill and
instead assesses potential impairments of such intangible assets and goodwill.
See Note 3, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies".
Acquisitions in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002:
- -----------------------------------------------------
WIZSHOP.COM, INC. ("WIZSHOP")
On April 6, 2001 WizShop's shareholders approved a merger transaction with
Semotus. On May 7, Semotus acquired all the outstanding stock of WizShop and the
transaction officially closed. The acquisition was accounted for under the
purchase method of accounting. The value of common stock issued for the
acquisition was approximately $3.4 million. Semotus recorded $3.4 million of
goodwill. Semotus issued 699,993 shares of common stock and may issue up to
another 750,000 shares over the next year if certain revenue targets are met.
Semotus has also agreed to issue additional shares if Semotus' common stock does
not trade at or above $10.00 per share by the end of each year after such shares
are issued. The maximum number of additional shares that can be issued is twice
the initial shares and earnout shares that have not been sold by the original
WizShop stockholders. The first of the measurement dates was August 2002. At
that time, the Company's common stock had not closed at $10.00 per share or
above; therefore, 613,403 additional shares were issued to the original WizShop
stockholders still holding the original shares issued.
The effect of issuing any additional shares if certain revenue targets are met
will be accounted for as additional purchase price consideration. The effect of
issuing any additional shares if certain per share trading prices are not met
has been accounted for in the Company's financial statements at the date of
acquisition in accordance with EITF 97-15, "Accounting for Contingency
Arrangements based on Security Prices in a Purchase Business Combination".
WizShop builds and maintains outsourced e-commerce environments for Internet
portal companies and also creates online sales and merchandising programs for
its clients through merchandizing and marketing initiatives.
APPLICATION DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC.
On April 30, 2001, Semotus and Application Design Associates, Inc. ("ADA")
signed a merger agreement. On May 15, 2001 Semotus acquired all the outstanding
stock of ADA and the transaction officially closed. The acquisition was
accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The value of common stock
issued for the acquisition was approximately $1.25 million. Semotus recorded
$1.3 million of goodwill. Semotus issued 250,000 shares of the Company's common
stock and may issue up to another 750,000 shares of common stock over the next
two years if certain revenue targets are met. Semotus had also agreed to issue
additional shares if Semotus' common stock does not trade at or above $5.00 per
share by the end of
48
each year after such shares are issued. The maximum number of additional shares
that could be issued would be twice the initial shares and earn out shares, or 2
million shares. On April 30, 2002 Semotus' common stock had not traded at or
above $5.00 per share; therefore, Semotus issued 250,000 additional shares.
However, in May of 2003, GBG, currently a 49% shareholder in ADA, exercised its
option to purchase the remaining 51% of ADA. See Note 5, "Discontinued
Operations". As consideration for this option to purchase, GBG returned the
500,000 total Semotus restricted common shares issued as part of the ADA
acquisition to Semotus. Any remaining obligations under the merger agreement
were terminated upon GBG's exercise of its purchase option.
ADA creates proprietary software that is a complete logistical solution for
automation of customer call centers, dispatching, equipment deployment,
servicing and invoicing, while interfacing to existing corporate business
functions and existing ERP solutions.
Acquisitions in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001
- ----------------------------------------------------
CROSS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
In July 2000, the Company acquired all of the assets and assumed selected
liabilities of Cross Communications, Inc. ("Cross") for $100,000 in cash and
62,500 shares of Semotus common stock accounted for under the purchase method.
The purchase price was approximately $2.0 million. Goodwill was also
approximately $2.0 million, since Cross had a deminimus number of assets. The
sole shareholder of Cross has a right to contingent purchase consideration based
upon operating performance for which an additional 187,500 shares of Semotus
common stock may be issued over the next year should revenue targets be met. As
of March 31, 2002, Semotus had issued an additional 64,947 shares of additional
purchase consideration. Further, up to a maximum of 250,000 shares may be issued
if by the end of the third year, the Semotus common stock price has not reached
$20 per share. In May of 2003, the parties entered a settlement agreement in
which a total of 187,500 additional shares were issued in lieu of any additional
earn out or price guarantee obligations, and each party released the other from
all remaining obligations (see Note 28, "Subsequent Events").
Cross, established in 1995, is a wireless communications company that provides a
premise based messaging platform under the brand name "HipLink"(TM). The HipLink
solution supports both UNIX and NT and is scalable and configurable to the
specific requirements of the enterprise customer.
SIMKIN, INC.
In September 2000, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding
capital stock of Simkin, Inc. ("Simkin") for $160,000 in cash and 100,000 shares
of Semotus common stock accounted for under the purchase method. The purchase
price was approximately $1.6 million. Goodwill was approximately $1.6 million.
The sole shareholder of Simkin has a right to contingent purchase consideration
based upon operating performance for which an additional 212,500 shares of
Semotus common stock may be issued over the next year should revenue targets be
met. As of March 31, 2003, no additional shares have been issued.
Simkin, established in 1982, is a producer of pharmaceutical and medical
software tools in addition to providing on-site and computer-assisted
pharmaceutical training programs. Simkin's core software is a proprietary drug
dosing product which also provides the foundation for a prototype wireless
solution which allows healthcare professionals to improve a patient's drug
therapy.
ISS, INC. DBA WARESONTHEWEB.COM
In November 2000, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital
stock of ISS, Inc. dba WaresOnTheWeb.com ("Wares") for 250,000 shares of Semotus
common stock accounted for under the purchase method. The purchase price was
approximately $1.7 million. Goodwill was approximately $1.6 million. The
shareholders of Wares had a right to contingent purchase consideration based
upon operating performance for which an additional 2,250,000 shares of Semotus
common stock would be issued over the next two years if revenue targets had been
met. The contingent consideration required a substantial growth in revenues,
which was not achieved.
In August, 2002, Wares filed for bankruptcy and its operations were
discontinued. See Note 5, "Discontinued Operations".
Wares was an established turnkey provider of e-commerce solutions to leading
retailers, distributors and manufacturers.
49
FIVE STAR ADVANTAGE, INC. AND TECH-NI-COMM, INC.
In December 2000, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock
of Five Star Advantage, Inc. and Tech-ni-comm, Inc (together, "Five Star"). Both
companies were controlled by a common 100% owner and were performing a common
business. Semotus issued 550,000 shares to the owner and accounted for the
transaction using the pooling of interest method.
Five Star was an e-marketing and e-fulfillment company that provided a start to
finish turnkey operation for online sales, marketing, logistics, fulfillment and
customer service for its clients.
In June, 2002, Five Star filed for bankruptcy and its operations were
discontinued. See Note 5, "Discontinued Operations".
5. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS.
As part of Semotus' Centralization and Consolidation Plan, Semotus reduced its
e-commerce and m-commerce presence with the elimination of unprofitable products
and services from that segment. Five Star was not expected to make a significant
contribution to the Company's future profitability as its operations were
unprofitable. Therefore, Semotus decided to close the facilities and cease the
operations as of the end of June 2002. Furthermore, Five Star filed for
liquidation under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on June 28, 2002. In
continuing with the reduced e-commerce and m-commerce presence and the
elimination of unprofitable products and services, Semotus decided to
discontinue the operations of Wares on the Web in August, 2002. The Wares on the
Web operations were unprofitable. Furthermore, Wares on the Web filed for
liquidation under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on August 19, 2002.
In accordance with SFAS 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets", the operations of Five Star Advantage, Inc. have been
recorded as discontinued operations in the year ended March 31, 2003. Five Star
was part of the Enterprise and Commerce Sales segment. The disposal of the
assets and liabilities is now under the control of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. In
the same manner, Wares on the Web's operations have been recorded as
discontinued in the year ended March 31, 2003. It also was part of the
Enterprise and Commerce Sales segment. The disposal of the assets and
liabilities is now under the control of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. A net loss
from discontinued operations for Five Star and Wares of $122,021 was recorded at
March 31, 2003. Further, a net gain upon disposition of the assets and
liabilities of Five Star and Wares of $128,582 was recognized at March 31, 2003.
On January 18, 2002 the Global Beverage Group, "GBG", a Canadian-based direct
store delivery consortium, completed a strategic investment in Semotus' ADA
subsidiary by acquiring a 49% share in ADA. For its 49% stock purchase, GBG paid
Semotus $250,000 in cash and agreed to invest $1 million in ADA over the next 15
months in order to help with the development of the next generation of ADA asset
tracking and management software. Additionally, as part of the transaction, GBG
assumed a personal loan of the President of ADA and received the 250,000 shares
of Semotus stock securing the loan. GBG had also received common stock options
exercisable into 150,000 shares of Semotus stock at $0.75 per share. At the end
of 15 months, GBG had the option to purchase Semotus' 51% ownership of ADA for
either (i) $2.5 million in cash or (ii) return of the 250,000 shares of common
stock received for assuming the personal loan. The purchase agreement also
carried a price guaranty, for which Semotus issued an additional 250,000 shares
(see Note 4, "Acquisitions - Application Design Associates, Inc."). On May 6,
2003, GBG purchased the remaining 51% of ADA for the return of 500,000 shares of
Semotus' common stock. This decision resulted in the discontinuation of ADA's
operations in fiscal year 2003. In accordance with SFAS 144, ADA's assets and
liabilities are classified as held for sale in the accompanying balance sheet as
of March 31, 2003. ADA's operations have also been recorded as discontinued in
the year ended March 31, 2003. ADA was the logistic systems segment. A net loss
from discontinued operations of $677,069 was recorded as of March 31, 2003,
mostly comprised of an impairment to goodwill of $635,724 (which is included in
the Statement of operations and comprehensive loss in the line "net loss from
discontinued operations"). Management performed the impairment tests as
described in Note 6, "Impairment of Long Lived Assets and Goodwill" and as
defined in SFAS 144 and SFAS 142 to determine the impairment expense.
The major classes of assets and liabilities included as part of the disposal
group of assets held for sale are as follows: at March 31, 2003, cash of
$62,965, accounts receivable of $147,649, inventory of $41,069, goodwill of
$408,000, accounts payable of $44,432 and deferred revenue of $199,700. Further,
Semotus classified the $321,216 of minority interest in ADA as a long-term
liability from discontinued operations. At March 31, 2003, there was inventory
of $178,171 and payables of $166,394, as well as $71,989 in cash and $54,346 in
accounts receivable related to the other discontinued operations. Revenue from
Five Star recorded in the year ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was
$$152,992, $1,427,482 and $3,088,980, respectively. Revenue from Wares recorded
in the year ended March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $26,570, $536,771 and
$548,789, respectively. Revenue from ADA recorded for the years ended March 31,
2003 and 2002 was $1,137,339 and $1,611,424 respectively.
50
6. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS AND GOODWILL
In the prior year, Semotus' management performed an on-going analysis of the
recoverability of its goodwill and other intangibles and the value of its
investments in accordance with SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and For Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" and SFAS 142,
"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". Based on quantitative and qualitative
measures, the Company assessed the need to record impairment losses on
long-lived assets used in operations when impairment indicators are present.
A number of factors indicated that impairment may have arisen in the period
ended March 31, 2002 for certain amounts of goodwill related to the acquisitions
of Simkin and WizShop. Also, an impairment may have arisen with the recorded
asset value of the Company's Global Market Pro intellectual property.
For Simkin, the analysis was to determine if a further reduction in goodwill was
necessary. Semotus had previously taken a $650,000 net impairment charge in the
quarter ended June 30, 2001. See Note 7, "Sale of Technology and Net Impairment
of Goodwill". For WizShop, Semotus analyzed the current carrying value of the
goodwill related to the acquisition.
The analysis focused on the future prospects for the businesses given the
current state of the economy and the technology market. Additionally, a critical
factor was that the consideration paid by Semotus for those companies in the
form of the issuance of shares of the Company's common stock was at a time when
its stock price was much higher than at March 31, 2002. The Company's stock
price was approximately $14.375 at the time of the acquisition of Simkin and
approximately $2.15 at the time of the acquisition of WizShop. At March 31,
2002, the Company's stock price was $0.67. Finally, all of these companies were
privately held at the time of the acquisition and their fair value was and is
subjective and not readily determinable. At the time of the acquisition, market
valuations for such companies were at substantially higher levels. Since the end
of the calendar year 2001, stock prices and market valuations in Simkin's and
WizShop's industry and similar industries have fallen substantially in response
to a variety of factors, including a general downturn in the economy, a
curtailment in the availability of capital and a general reduction in technology
expenditures.
For the asset value related to the Global Market Pro intellectual property, the
future prospects for the business derived from the Global Market Pro and Equity
Market Pro products and the financial services division was examined. The
analysis focused on the consideration paid for the intellectual property in the
form of 800,000 warrants of Semotus common stock. The exercise price of those
warrants, $30.00 per common share, is significantly higher than the market price
of the stock, $0.67, at March 31, 2002. See Note 8, "GMP Intellectual Property
and J.P. Morgan Chase Manhattan Warrants". Further, the financial services
industry has declined dramatically in response to the general economic recession
and to the terrorist events of September 11, 2001.
Based on the factors described above, the Company determined that the goodwill
in its Simkin and WizShop subsidiaries and the asset value of the GMP
Intellectual Property may have become impaired. In accordance with SFAS No. 121,
the Company performed an undiscounted cash flow analysis of its acquisition to
determine whether an impairment existed. When the undiscounted cash flows were
less than the carrying value of the net assets, management determined a range of
fair values using a combination of valuation methodologies. The methodologies
included:
o Discounted cash flow analysis, which is based upon converting expected
future cash flows to present value.
o Changes in market value since the date of acquisition relative to the
following:
o The Company's stock price;
o Comparable companies;
o Contribution to the Company's market valuation and overall business
prospects.
The methodologies used were consistent with the specific valuation methods used
when the original purchase price and asset value were determined. The Company's
best estimate of the fair value of Simkin, WizShop and the GMP Intellectual
Property was determined from the range of possible values after considering the
relative performance, future prospects and risk profile of those companies and
GMP.
As a result of Semotus' review, management determined that the carrying value of
goodwill and recorded asset value were not fully recoverable and an impairment
charge of $3,617,283 was taken for goodwill comprised of an impairment charge to
Simkin's goodwill of $909,272 (of which $650,000 was recorded in the quarter
ended June 30, 2001, see Note 7 "Sale of Technology and Net Impairment of
Goodwill") and $2,708,011 for WizShop's goodwill. Furthermore, Semotus took an
impairment charge of $3,420,000 for the GMP intellectual property asset in the
quarter ended March 31, 2002.
51
This year, in accordance with SFAS 144, Semotus has presented the operations of
FiveStar, Wares and ADA as discontinued operations. In the net loss from
discontinued operations for 2002 and 2003, impairment charges were taken against
the goodwill of both Wares (fiscal year 2002) and ADA (fiscal year2003). As
discussed in this Note 6, Semotus performed the impairment tests and determined
that impairment charges were required. The impairment expense for the Wares
goodwill was $1,156,587 and for the ADA goodwill was $635,724.
At March 31, 2003, the Company determined that the carrying value of its
remaining goodwill and other intangibles from continuing operations are
recoverable. Management has determined that the remaining goodwill of $1,430,141
(net of accumulated amortization of $727,058) is fairly valued using the
impairment tests as described in SFAS 121, SFAS 142 and SFAS 144, which includes
discounted cash flow analysis and comparable company analysis. This remaining
amount of goodwill consists entirely of one of the Company's wireless enterprise
application software product lines, the HipLink family of software products,
which is generating current revenue and cash flow. The Company will continue to
analyze the recoverability of its long-lived assets and assess the need to
record impairment losses when impairment indicators are present.
7. SALE OF TECHNOLOGY AND NET IMPAIRMENT OF GOODWILL
The reduction in goodwill for Simkin in June 2001 of $1,000,000 is comprised of
two components: (i) the sale of Simkin's Kinetidex technology for $350,000 and
(ii) an impairment charge to goodwill related to Simkin for $650,000.
In June 2001, Semotus announced the sale by Simkin of a software program called
Kinetidex 2.0 to Micromedex, Inc., the joint developer and exclusive distributor
of the product. Kinetidex is a drug dosing software program that was jointly
developed by the Company's Simkin subsidiary and Micromedex. Semotus received
$350,000 from Micromedex for the sale of the product and all future royalty
rights. Additionally, Simkin agreed to discontinue the sale of the product
Kinetidex replaced, Capcil. Semotus' management performed an on-going analysis
of the recoverability of its goodwill and other intangibles and the value of its
investments in accordance with SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and For Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of". Based on
quantitative and qualitative measures, the Company assessed the need to record
impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when impairment
indicators are present.
A number of factors indicated that impairment may have arisen in the period
ended June 30, 2001, specifically for Semotus' Simkin subsidiary. The above
mentioned sale of the Kinetidex technology for $350,000 was one factor
considered. Future prospects for the business was another factor considered.
Additionally, a third critical factor was that the consideration paid by Semotus
for Simkin was in the form of the issuance of shares of the Company's common
stock at a time when its stock price was much higher than at June 30, 2001. The
Company's stock price was approximately $14.375 at the time of the acquisition.
At June 30, 2001, the Company's stock price was $1.59. Finally, Simkin was
privately held at the time of the acquisition and its fair value was and is
subjective and not readily determinable. At the time of the acquisition, market
valuations for such a company were at historically high levels. Since the end of
the calendar year 2000, stock prices and market valuations in Simkin's industry
and similar industries have fallen substantially in response to a variety of
factors, including a general downturn in the economy, a curtailment in the
availability of capital and a general reduction in technology expenditures.
Based on the factors described above, the Company determined that the goodwill
in its Simkin subsidiary may have become impaired. In accordance with SFAS No.
121, the Company performed an undiscounted cash flow analysis of its acquisition
to determine whether an impairment existed. When the undiscounted cash flows
were less than the carrying value of the net assets, management determined a
range of fair values using a combination of valuation methodologies. The
methodologies included:
o Discounted cash flow analysis, which is based upon converting expected
future cash flows to present value.
o Changes in market value since the date of acquisition relative to the
following:
o the Company's stock price;
o comparable companies;
o Contribution to the Company's market valuation and overall business
prospects.
The methodologies used were consistent with the specific valuation methods used
when the original purchase price was determined. The Company's best estimate of
the fair value of Simkin was determined from the range of possible values after
considering the relative performance, future prospects and risk profile of
Simkin.
52
As a result of Semotus' review, management determined that the carrying value of
goodwill was not fully recoverable and an impairment charge of $650,000 was
taken in the quarter ended June 30, 2001.
8. GMP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND J.P. MORGAN CHASE MANHATTAN WARRANTS
On July 7, 2000 the Company granted an affiliate of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
common stock warrants to purchase up to 800,000 shares of Semotus common stock
at a price of $30.00 per common share. These warrants have a five year life, are
non-callable, and were granted in exchange for all royalty and intellectual
property rights associated with the Global Market Pro ("GMP") product, including
all copyrights, patents and trade secrets. The value of these warrants as
calculated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model amounted
to $6,800,000 and was originally being amortized to expense over a five year
period. This amount was recorded in intellectual property with a corresponding
increase to additional paid-in capital. For the fiscal years ended March 31,
2003, 2002 and 2001, amortization amounted to $1,000,000, $1,360,000 and
$1,020,000, respectively.
Further, Semotus determined that an impairment charge to the GMP intellectual
property asset, as well as an adjustment to its useful life, was necessary as of
March 31, 2002, which amounted to $3,420,000 and brought the recorded value to
$1,000,000 at March 31, 2002. This value has since been completely amortized as
of March 31, 2003.
9. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment is comprised of the following:
March 31,
---------
2003 2002
----------- -----------
Furniture and fixtures .................................... $ 308,777 $ 308,676
Computers, and other office equipment ..................... 1,083,960 1,090,226
Capitalized equipment leases .............................. 74,370 77,149
Leasehold improvements .................................... 120,059 95,920
Purchased software ........................................ 321,742 358,705
----------- -----------
1,908,908 1,930,676
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization ............ (1,566,294) (1,308,005)
----------- -----------
$ 342,614 $ 622,671
=========== ===========
10. ADVANCES ON TECHNOLOGY SALE:
During fiscal year 1997, the Company entered into two separate transactions
involving the sale of rights to its technologies underlying two products,
QuoteXpress and MailXpress. The transactions occurred with two separate Canadian
companies and were nearly identical in nature in that they involved the receipt
of cash and notes receivable from the buyers, with the notes receivable being
collateralized by the intellectual properties being sold. Concurrent with the
sales, Semotus and the buyers entered into "Management and Marketing Agreements"
with the buyers giving the Company exclusive worldwide rights to use, modify and
sub license the source code for the technologies and providing for fees to be
paid to the buyers under certain conditions. Any payments between parties are
contingent upon each other, and are structured in such a way to minimize the
possibility that either party will ever make payments to the other. At this
time, no money has been paid to the buyers and based upon current projections,
it is anticipated that no moneys will be paid under the remainder of the terms.
The cash payments received up front, amounting to $2,190,000 and $2,900,000
respectively, had been accounted for under the provisions of the "Emerging
Issues Task Force 88-18: Sales of Future Revenues" (EITF 88-18) and as such,
were deferred and were reflected under the balance sheet caption "Advances on
technology sales", andwere being amortized to income using the interest method
over the terms of the agreements. The notes receivable due to the Company
resulting from the sales had not been recorded, as it was expected that any fees
or revenue share that otherwise might accrue to the buyers of the technologies
as a result of the management and marketing agreements would not be sufficient
to service the note receivable principal and interest payments due Semotus. If
the notes receivable due to the Company were not repaid, as presently projected,
the ownership of the intellectual properties will revert back to the Company at
the end of the agreements. On June 14, 2000, the Company entered into an
agreement with the buyers for an option to repurchase the QuoteXpress product
for $4 million. As consideration, Semotus extended the term of existing warrants
issued to the buyers for another two years, until June 2002 and issued 10,000
new options with an exercise price of $11.50 which expired in June 2002. The
Company recorded the value of these warrants as a reduction of the technology
advances.
53
Interest income on the notes has been recognized to the extent of the amounts
due to buyers under the "Owners fee" provisions of the sales agreements, with
both the interest income and the "Owners fee" reflected in other income, along
with the amortization of the technology advances.
The products related to these agreements are obsolete and are not generating any
revenue. The Company has fulfilled all obligations under these agreements and
therefore the Company has amortized the remaining balance of the advances on
technology sales liability into income as of March 31, 2003.
11. NOTE PAYABLE
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, the Company entered into three
notes payable to settle certain existing contractual obligations to third
parties amounting to a total of $135,093 in notes payable. $78,869 was paid on
these notes in fiscal year 2003. The total future payments on these notes is
$56,224, which will be fully paid off in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2004.
Semotus entered into a one-year note payable with its primary banking
institution in March 2001. The note was extended for six months in March 2002
and became due September 2002. The Company repaid the note in full in September
2002. The note payable had an interest rate of 7.2% in fiscal year 2003, which
was the same as in the previous year. The interest was payable monthly, with the
principal due and payable at maturity in September 2002. The note was secured by
cash in the form of a certificate of deposit in the amount of $693,286 for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2002. The certificate of deposit mirrored the note
payable in term and carried an interest rate of 2.0% in the past year.
12. CAPITAL LEASE:
In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, the Company did not sign or settle any
capital leases.
In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, the Company and its subsidiaries signed
leases amounting to $110,119.
Accumulated depreciation on capitalized lease assets was $45,222 and $22,265 at
March 31, 2003 and 2002 respectively.
The combined principal and interest portions due under our capital leases for
the next five years are as follows:
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
--------------------
2004 ......................................... $ 26,265
2005 ......................................... 15,546
2006 ......................................... 2,166
2007 ......................................... --
2008 ......................................... --
--------
43,977
Less imputed interest ......................... (5,057)
--------
Total ......................................... $ 38,920
========
13. CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK:
Under the Company's Articles of Incorporation, as amended in February 1998, the
Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. 2,740,000
shares have been designated as Series A preferred stock, of which no shares are
outstanding as of March 31, 2003, and 769,231 has been designated as Series B
preferred stock, of which no shares are outstanding as of March 31, 2003.
Repurchase Of Preferred Stock:
On December 31, 2002, Semotus Solutions, Inc. and Brown Simpson Partners I, Ltd.
(successors-in-interest to Brown Simpson Strategic Growth Fund, Ltd. and Brown
Simpson Strategic Growth Fund, L.P.) entered into a Preferred Stock Buy Back and
Mutual Release Agreement. As part of the Agreement, Semotus repurchased from
Brown Simpson all of the outstanding shares of the Company's Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock. The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock was
reflected on Semotus' balance sheet as $5.7 million in Preferred Shareholder
Equity. In consideration of the aforesaid purchase of the Shares, Semotus paid
one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) and issued to Brown Simpson 846,154
warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock of Semotus, exercisable at $0.01 per
share, such price was a negotiated price. In addition, in consideration for
Brown Simpson agreeing to enter into a settlement and mutual release related to
its anti-
54
dilution claim, the Company repriced Brown Simpson's existing 1,153,846 warrants
to provide for an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The value of the warrants
repriced as determined by the Black-Scholes method, has been charged to
operations, while the value of the additional warrants issued has been charged
to equity. On January 24, 2003, Brown Simpson exercised 1,153,846 warrants by
remitting $11,538.46 to Semotus, and Brown Simpson was issued 1,153,846 shares
of common stock. On May 1, 2003, Brown Simpson exercised 846,154 warrants
exercisable at $0.01 per share by remitting $8,461.54 to Semotus, and Brown
Simpson was issued 846,154 shares of common stock.
14. COMMON SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Under the Company's Articles of Incorporation, as amended in June 1999, Semotus
is authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 19,275,211
and 17,200,784 was issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2003 and 2002
respectively.
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, in August, 2002, in connection with
the fiscal year 2002 acquisition of WizShop, the Company issued 613,403 common
shares as additional purchase consideration (see Note 4, "Acquisitions -
WizShop.com, Inc."). In April of 2002, in connection with the fiscal year 2002
acquisition of Application Design Associates, the Company issued 250,000 common
shares as additional purchase consideration. However, on May 6, 2003 these
250,000 shares, as well as the original 250,000 shares issued to ADA, were
returned to the Company as part of GBG's option to purchase ADA, which was
closed on May 6, 2003. (See Note 4, "Acquisitions - Application Design
Associates, Inc."). Additionally, during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003,
the Company issued 57,178 shares to settle certain liabilities of the Company or
the Company's subsidiaries.
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, in connection with the acquisition
of Cross, the Company issued 64,947 common shares as additional purchase
consideration (see Note 4, "Acquisitions - Cross Communications, Inc."). In May,
2001, in connection with the acquisition of WizShop, the Company issued 699,993
common shares (see Note 4, "Acquisitions - WizShop.com, Inc."). Also in May,
2001, in connection with the acquisition of ADA, the Company issued 250,000
common shares (see Note 4, "Acquisitions - Application Design Associates,
Inc."). In addition, during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, the Company
issued a total of 198,093 shares to various suppliers of services, and a total
of 75,073 shares to settle certain liabilities of the Company or the Company's
subsidiaries.
In December 2000, in connection with the acquisition of Five Star, the Company
issued 550,000 shares of common stock (see Note 4, "Acquisitions - Five Star
Advantage, Inc. and Tech-ni-comm, Inc.") In November 2000, in connection with
the acquisition of Wares, the Company issued 249,998 shares of common stock (see
Note 4, "Acquisitions - ISS, Inc. dba WaresOnTheWeb.com"). On October 9, 2000,
the Board of Directors approved a buy back program, whereby up to one million
shares of the Company's outstanding stock may be bought in the open market over
the next year. As of October 9, 2001, when the buy back program terminated, the
Company had not bought back any shares of its common stock. In addition, during
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001, the Company issued a total of 29,345
shares to various suppliers of services, and a total of 87,420 shares to settle
certain liabilities of the Company or the Company's subsidiaries.
In August 2000, in connection with the acquisition of Simkin, the Company issued
100,000 shares of common stock (see Note 4, "Acquisitions - Simkin, Inc.") On
August 15, 2000, 54,342 warrants were cashless exercised and 33,865 shares of
common stock were issued. In July, 2000, the Company issued a warrant to
purchase 800,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $30.00 per share
to an affiliate of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. in exchange for all royalty and
intellectual property rights associated with the GMP product (see Note 8, "GMP
Intellectual Property and J.P. Morgan Chase Warrants"). In July, 2000 the
Company also issued 62,500 shares of common stock in connection with the
acquisition of Cross (See Note 4, "Acquisitions - Cross Communications, Inc.").
On March 13, 2000 the Board of Directors of the Company approved a 2 for 1 stock
split. The 2 for 1 stock split was effected on April 27, 2000 and applied to all
holders of common stock of record. As a result of the split the number of shares
of common stock into which the preferred stock could be converted was increased
to 1,538,462 from 769,231. All financial data and share data in this Form 10- K
give retroactive effect to this split, unless otherwise indicated.
As of February 14, 2000, Semotus consummated a private placement to two
investment funds of (i) 769,231 shares of Series B Convertible preferred stock
(post split each share of Series B preferred stock is convertible into two
shares of common stock) and (ii) five-year warrants to purchase up to an
aggregate of 1,153,846 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $8.75 per
share. The Company also issued a warrant to purchase up to 153,846 shares of
common stock, at an exercise price of $6.50 per share, to its placement agent
with respect to the private placement. The Company received $9,315,501 in cash,
net of expenses and commissions of $684,499. On April 26, 2000, 300,000 shares
of Series B convertible preferred stock were converted into 600,000 shares of
common stock. As of March 31, 2002, 469,231 shares of Series B convertible
preferred were outstanding, and as of March 31, 2003, no shares of Series B
convertible preferred are outstanding. (See Note 13, "Convertible Preferred
Stock").
55
Warrants:
As of March 31, 2003, a total of 2,225,658 warrants to purchase shares of
Semotus' common stock remain outstanding. 846,154 of those were exercisable at
$0.01 per share, and were subsequently exercised on May 1, 2003 (See Note 28
"Subsequent Events"). 800,000 are currently exercisable at $30.00 per share and
expire on July 7, 2005. 300,000 are currently exercisable at $2.375 per share
and expire on December 1, 2004. 99,504 are currently exercisable at $6.5 per
share and expire on February 8, 2005. 150,000 are currently exercisable at $1.01
per share and expire on December 27, 2003. 30,000 are currently exercisable at
$18.00 per share and expire on August 2, 2005.
STOCK OPTION PLAN:
In June 1996, the Company adopted the 1996 Stock Option Incentive Plan (the
"Plan"). The "Plan" provides for the granting of stock options to acquire common
stock and/or the granting of stock appreciation rights to obtain, in cash or
shares of common stock, the benefit of the appreciation of the value of shares
of common stock after the grant date. On September 17, 2002 the Company's
shareholders approved an increase in the number of shares of Common Stock
issuable under the Plan from 4,345,000 to 5,200,000. The Plan expires ten years
after its adoption.
Under the Plan, the Board of Directors may grant incentive stock options to
purchase shares of the Company's common stock only to employees, and the Board
of Directors may grant non-qualified stock options to purchase shares of the
Company's common stock to directors, officers, consultants and advisers of the
Company. The Board of Directors may grant options to purchase shares of the
Company's common stock at prices not less than fair market value, as defined
under the Plan, at the date of grant for all stock options. The Board of
Directors also has the authority to set exercise dates (no longer than ten years
from the date of grant), payment terms and other provisions for each grant. In
addition, incentive options may be granted to persons owning more than 10% of
the voting power of all classes of stock, at a price no lower than 110% of the
fair market value at the date of grant, as determined by the Board of Directors.
Options granted under the Plan generally vest over four years at a rate of 25%
after year one and then equally on a monthly basis over the next three years
from the date of grant. As of March 31, 2003, no stock appreciation rights have
been granted under the Plan.
On May 1, 2002, all employees with a fifty thousand dollar annual salary or
greater took a ten percent salary reduction. In exchange, on May 16, 2002, the
Board of Directors approved the repricing of all of those employees' outstanding
stock options under the Company's 1996 Stock Option Plan to $0.43 per share, and
$0.47 per share for Anthony LaPine and Pamela LaPine (which equals 110% of the
amended exercise price). Exercise prices ranged from $0.76 to $0.84 per share.
Additionally, these employees received an additional grant equal to 10% of their
total options granted under the Stock Option Plan to date.
Effective October 23, 2002 the Board of Directors of the Company approved the
repricing of all of the options held by almost all of the employees (including
executive officers) of the Company. Exercise prices ranged from $0.22 to $0.47
per share. The Board of Directors determined such a repricing to be appropriate
in order to sustain the incentivization of its employees. Employees' existing
option grants were repriced on October 23, 2002 to an exercise price of $0.15
per share (the current fair market value of the Company's common stock as of the
reprice date) and an exercise price of $0.17 per share (110% of the fair market
value at the date of reprice) for those persons owning more than 10% of the
voting power of all classes of stock (Anthony LaPine and Pamela LaPine). All
grants maintained their existing vesting schedules. These are deemed to be a
repricing under FIN 44 and will result in variable plan accounting. While no
compensation expense was required to be recognized in the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2003, expense will be recognized in the future if the stock price
increases above the revised exercise price of the options.
Activity for stock options under the 1996 Stock Option Incentive Plan through
March 31, 2003 is as follows:
Shares Weighted
Available for Average
Grant Number of Options Price Per Share Exercise Price
-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Balances, March 31, 2000* (852,342) 1,579,938 $0.50 - $20.00 $ 4.64
Authorized .............. 2,500,000 -- -- --
Granted ................. (3,529,000) 3,529,000 $0.50 - 28.77 $ 5.74
Canceled ................ 1,933,933 (1,933,933) $0.50 - $28.77 $ 9.42
Exercised ............... -- (131,288) $0.50 - $2.53 $ 1.33
-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Balances, March 31, 2001* 52,591 3,043,717 $0.56 - $20.00 $ 3.02
Authorized .............. 845,000 -- -- --
56
Granted ................. (4,543,680) 4,543,680 $0.67 - $7.00 $ 1.02
Canceled ................ 4,016,441 (4,016,441) $0.56 - $20.00 $ 2.68
Exercised ............... -- (8,302) $1.28 - $1.63 $ 1.40
-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Balances, March 31, 2002* 370,352 3,562,654 $0.67 - $5.44 $ 0.86
Authorized .............. 855,000 -- -- --
Granted ................. (4,957,530) 4,957,530 $0.14 - $0.66 $ 0.25
Canceled ................ 5,397,941 (5,397,941) $0.15 - $5.44 $ 0.55
Exercised ............... -- -- -- --
-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Balances, March 31, 2003 1,665,763 3,122,243 $0.14 - $2.01 $ 0.31
*The balances as of March 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 reported in this Form 10K
differ slightly from the balances as of March 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 as
reported in the Company's Form 10K filed last year; this is due to a small
number of stock option activities, such as grants, cancellations and exercises,
not having been reported by the time this table was drafted for the current Form
10K filing year. Management does not feel that these numbers are significant, as
the difference between these numbers is only approximately 25,000 shares, or
less than 1% of the total outstanding.
The weighted average fair value of those options granted during the years ended
March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $0.29, $1.09 and $1.98, respectively. The
weighted average fair value of those options that were repriced on October 23,
2002 was $0.08. Options to purchase 1,962,864, 1,268,477 and 568,570 shares were
exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $0.30, $0.80 and $3.06 at
March 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The following table summarizes the stock options outstanding at March 31, 2003:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING CURRENTLY EXERCISABLE
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
WEIGHTED
NUMBER AVERAGE
OUTSTANDING REMAINING WEIGHTED NUMBER WEIGHTED
RANGE OF AT MARCH 31, CONTRACTUAL AVERAGE EXERCISABLE AT AVERAGE
EXERCISE PRICE 2003 LIFE EXERCISE PRICE MARCH 31, 2003 EXERCISE PRICE
- -------------- --------------- ------------------ ----------------- ------------------ -----------------
$0.00 - $0.15 1,404,638 7.5 $0.15 695,357 $0.15
$0.16 - $0.20 1,286,000 7.0 $0.17 980,974 $0.17
$0.21 - $1.00 259,605 8.4 $0.75 207,705 $0.75
$1.01 - $5.00 172,000 8.1 $2.01 78,828 $2.01
--------------- ------------------ ----------------- ------------------ -----------------
3,122,243 7.4 $0.31 1,962,864 $0.30
=============== ================== ================= ================== =================
15. REVENUE
The Company derives revenue from its customers as discussed in Note 3, "Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies: Revenue Recognition". From Semotus' wireless
services segment, two customers accounted for 23% of the Company's revenues for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003. One customer in the wireless services
segment accounted for 17% of revenues, and a second customer in the wireless
services segment accounted for 6% of revenues. None of these customers account
for any significant accounts receivable at March 31, 2003.
From Semotus' wireless services segment, one customer accounted for 6% of the
Company's revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002.
16. STOCK, OPTION AND WARRANT EXPENSE
The stock, option and warrant expense is a non-cash expense related to the
issuance of equity and equity-related securities for services performed for the
company by outside third party contractors. The accounting for the expense is in
accordance with SFAS 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation".
Stock issued for services and as payment for liabilities is priced using the
closing price of the Company's stock on the date the shares are issued. The
expense is recognized over the term of the agreement or when the services have
been performed.
57
The fair value of options and warrants issued for services is estimated using
the Black Scholes option pricing model. The pricing model's variables are
measured on the date of grant, or if there are contingencies related to the
services and vesting, the variables are measured on the date the contingencies
are satisfied. The exercise price is set equal to the closing price of the stock
on the measurement date. The term of the options and warrants ranges from one to
five years. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, interest rates used are
the appropriate Treasury rate of 3.46%. The expected volatility ranged from 102%
to 204%. The expense is recognized over the term of the agreement or when the
services have been performed.
17. OTHER INCOME:
Other income (expense) consists of the following items:
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
--------------------
DESCRIPTION 2003 2002 2001
- ----------- ---- ---- ----
Owners fee sales of technology $(1,176,750) $(1,569,000) $(1,569,000)
Interest on note from sales of technology 1,176,750 1,569,000 1,569,000
Amortization of technology advances 206,723 306,908 371,052
Cancellation of sales of technology contracts 628,927 -- --
Miscellaneous income (expense) 287,406 (17,223) 60,473
----------- ----------- -----------
Total other income $ 1,123,056 $ 289,685 $ 431,525
=========== =========== ===========
18. INCOME TAXES:
Deferred tax benefits arising from net operating loss carryforwards were
determined using the applicable statutory rates. The net operating loss
carryforward balances vary from the applicable percentages of net loss due to
expenses recognized under generally accepted accounting principles, but not
deductible for tax purposes.
Net operating loss carryforwards available for the Company for U.S. tax purposes
are as follows as of March 31, 2003:
----------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
FEDERAL STATE
----------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
BALANCE EXPIRATION BALANCE EXPIRATION
----------------- --------------------- ------------------ ------------------
$ 2,729,703 2012 $ 1,640,034 2004
3,219,423 2013 1,453,582 2005
4,429,411 2019 4,298,379 2011
3,684,281 2020 3,294,278 2012
9,313,338 2021 1,761,956 2013
--------------
8,036,642 2022 $ 12,448,229
2,171,022 2023 ==============
-----------------
$ 33,583,820
=================
At March 31, 2003, the Company has approximately $2,168,853 in Canadian net
operating loss carryforwards that expire from 2004 through 2008.
The utilization of the net operating losses to offset future taxable income may
be limited under U.S. tax laws.
For federal and state tax purposes, at March 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company had
net deferred tax assets of approximately $13,862,275 and $11,753,500,
respectively, which were fully offset by valuation allowances. These net
deferred tax assets principally arise due to the Company's net operating loss
carryforwards.
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, a valuation
allowance must be established for a deferred tax asset if it is uncertain that a
tax benefit may be realized from the asset in the future. The Company has
established a valuation allowance to the extent of its deferred tax assets since
it is more likely than not that the benefit will not be realized. The total
valuation allowance changed during this fiscal year by $2,108,775 and by
$2,161,000 in fiscal year 2002, and $3,592,500 in fiscal year 2001.
58
19. EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS) DISCLOSURES:
NET LOSS PER SHARE:
Basic EPS is computed as net income (loss) divided by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the
potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock
options, warrants and other convertible securities. Common equivalent shares are
excluded from the computation of net loss per share if their effect is
anti-dilutive.
The following is a reconciliation of the numerator (net loss) and denominator
(number of shares) used in the basic and diluted EPS calculation:
March 31,
------------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
------------ ------------ ------------
Basic EPS:
Net loss $ (3,432,350) $(18,444,478) $(11,293,381)
============ ============ ============
Weighted average common shares
outstanding 18,039,262 16,975,660 15,199,895
============ ============ ============
Basic EPS $ (0.19) $ (1.09) $ (0.74)
============ ============ ============
Diluted EPS:
Net loss $ (3,432,350) $(18,444,478) $(11,293,381)
============ ============ ============
Weighted average common shares
outstanding 18,039,262 16,975,660 15,199,895
Convertible preferred -- -- --
Warrants -- -- --
Stock options -- -- --
Total shares 18,039,262 16,975,660 15,199,895
------------ ------------ ------------
Diluted EPS $ (0.19) $ (1.09) $ (0.74)
============ ============ ============
In 2003, 2002 and 2001, 5,347,901 potential shares, 7,557,135 potential shares
and 7,053,854 potential shares respectively were excluded from the shares used
to calculate diluted EPS as their effect is anti-dilutive.
20. OPERATING LEASES:
In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, Semotus moved at the end of its lease
from its office in San Jose, California to an office in Los Gatos, California.
Semotus closed down its office for its Five Star operation in Valencia,
California, concurrent with the closing of the Five Star operations. Semotus
continued to sublease its office space in Sherman Oaks, California, where
WizShop resided, as those operations have been absorbed into the rest of the
Company; this sublease ended in April of 2003. Semotus continues to rent office
space in Vancouver, Canada for its R&D facilities. Rental expense for all of
these facilities was $187,388 in fiscal 2003, $548,354 in 2002 and $613,456 in
2001.
The Company currently leases space for its operations in Los Gatos, California
and Vancouver, British Columbia. The lease for the California office expires in
September 2004, with an option to terminate one year earlier without penalty,
and the lease for the office located in British Columbia expires in June 2007.
The terms and conditions of the leases are normal and customary.
Future minimum lease payments due under these agreements are as follows for the
years ending March 31:
2004 ..................... $ 77,683
2005 ..................... 49,353
2006 ..................... 23,184
2007 ..................... 24,426
2008 ..................... 6,210
---------
$ 180,856
=========
21. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
Effective May 1, 1996, the Company entered into a three year employment
agreement with the Company's Chief Executive
59
Officer. This agreement was extended to May 1, 2004. The agreement automatically
renews for one year terms unless notice is provided by either party. On December
1, 1999, the Board of Directors granted the Chief Executive Officer a warrant to
purchase 300,000 shares of common stock at $2.375 per share, as part of his
compensation package.
In conjunction with the private placement dated November 5, 1997 the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement. Under
the terms of the agreement, the Chief Executive Officer received 560,000 shares
of preferred stock with detachable warrants to purchase 280,000 shares of the
Company's common stock at $2.50 per share, in exchange for a note receivable in
the amount of $1,050,000. The note is collateralized by certain assets of the
officer and bears interest at a rate of 7%. This note was for the purchase of
stock and did not result in the Company lending cash to Mr. LaPine. Mr. LaPine
has not sold any of the stock purchased with this note and has not received any
cash income related to this transaction. Additionally, the warrants to purchase
280,000 shares at $2.50 per share have terminated.
On January 15, 2000, the Company entered into a Loan Forgiveness Agreement with
the Chief Executive Officer which provided that the $1,050,000 promissory note
would be forgiven if he continues to serve as the Company's Chief Executive
Officer through May 1, 2004, and there are no uncured defaults by him under his
Employment Agreement on May 1, 2004. The note, together with interest accrued
thereon has been presented as contra-equity in the balance sheet. The note plus
interest is being amortized over the period of the contract of employment.
Consequently, in the year ended March 31, 2003 expense of $631,435 has been
recorded as employment compensation.
On July 26, 2002, the Board of Directors approved the reduction in the purchase
price of the 560,000 shares of this corporation's Common Stock from $3.75 per
share to $0.25 per share (representing the current fair market value of the
shares); consequently, $480,049 was forgiven, and the $1,050,000 promissory note
was canceled in exchange for a new promissory note in the principal amount of
$140,200 and otherwise containing the same terms and conditions as the
surrendered promissory note. Consequently, the loan amortization schedule was
accelerated in the amount of $480,049 due to the re-valuation of the loan amount
from $1,050,000 to $140,200.
In 2001, WizShop.com, Inc., one of the Company's subsidiaries, entered into an
employment agreement with Steve McAllister, providing, among other things, an
annual salary of $150,000. As of March 27, 2003, Mr. McAllister resigned and the
employment agreement by and among Mr. McAllister and WizShop was terminated.
22. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
Wizshop.com, Inc., one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, filed a lawsuit against
Earthlink Network, Inc. and Earthlink Operations, Inc. (collectively
"Earthlink") on April 15, 2002 in the California Superior Court. This suit
alleges eight causes of action against Earthlink, including breach of written
agreement, promissory fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of fiduciary duty,
constructive fraud, unfair business practices, accounting and constructive
trust. The suit arises out of Earthlink's breach of the written agreement with
Wizshop, and Earthlink's apparent acts of fraud in connection with Earthlink's
failure and refusal to accurately account for and pay to Wizshop revenues to
which Wizshop is entitled to under the agreement. We are seeking monetary
damages for the above matter. On May 19, 2003, the parties reached a settlement
and signed a settlement and mutual general release agreement, in which Earthlink
agreed to pay to WizShop a total sum of $210,000.
Semotus and WizShop were dismissed with prejudice on March 7, 2003 from a class
action lawsuit brought by the California Teachers' Retirement System in November
of 2002.
We are also a party to other legal proceedings in the normal course of business.
Based on evaluation of these matters and discussions with counsel, we believe
that any potential liabilities arising from these matters will not have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial
position.
23. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN:
During 1998, the Company established a plan (the "Plan") which is qualified
under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Eligible employees
may make voluntary contributions to the Plan of up to 20% of their annual
compensation, not to exceed the statutory amount, and the Company may make
matching contributions. The Company made no contributions in 2003, 2002 or 2001.
24. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Semotus' business has evolved into three segments: wireless services, enterprise
and commerce sales, and professional and related services.
60
Semotus' wireless services segment focuses in three areas: Company hosted
solutions, client hosted (premise-based) solutions, and financial consumer
solutions. The Company creates wireless information products by customizing and
delivering actionable and time sensitive information whenever that information
is most valuable to the customer. Services and applications are device agnostic
and protocol independent, integrating seamlessly into every enterprise
infrastructure and working with every wireless carrier and all text messaging
devices. Semotus provides two different wireless solutions: (i) Company-hosted
where Semotus hosts and manages the information on its servers and (ii) premise
based where Semotus installs and engineers the software and information on the
customer's servers.
Semotus' enterprise and commerce line of business provides online transactional
information and sales of products and services. This line of business also
serves as the platform for the Company's m-commerce initiatives. The online
services include website development and maintenance, sales, marketing, customer
retention programs and services, logistics, distribution, and tracking and
reporting. Semotus uses the enterprise and commerce business to add-on wireless
products such as alerts to wireless devices, comparative data information and
real time messaging.
Semotus' professional service line of business provides customers with online
and wireless information and operations consulting, software engineering, and
training. This line of business provides the software tools and management to
install and efficiently run online and wireless operations. The professional and
related services business provides Semotus with access to customers who have
wireless requirements that can be met with Semotus' wireless solutions.
As Semotus continues to centralize and consolidate its business, the nature and
structure of the business segments may change.
Enterprise and
Wireless commerce Professional and Corporate and
Services sales related services other Total
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
As of and for the Year Ended March 31, 2003:
Revenue from continuing operations $ 1,293,801 $ 1,005,060 $ 45,390 -- $ 2,344,251
Gross profit from continuing operations $ 946,489 $ 428,101 $ 40,418 -- $ 1,415,008
Operating income (loss) from continuing operations* $ (1,254,049) $ 308,775 $ 21,846 $ (3,013,771) $ (3,937,199)
Net loss from discontinued operations -- -- -- $ (799,090) $ (799,090)
Depreciation and amortization from continuing $ 251,262 $ 60,454 $ 1,880 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,313,596
operations
Capital expenditures $ 16,949 -- -- -- $ 16,949
Total assets from discontinued operations -- -- -- $ 706,932 $ 706,932
Total assets, March 31, 2003 $ 3,027,947 $ 482,237 $ 265,613 $ 872,759 $ 4,648,556
As of and for the Year Ended March 31, 2002:
Revenue from continuing operations $ 1,305,347 $ 1,114,481 $ 111,590 -- $ 2,531,418
Gross profit from continuing operations $ 793,510 $ 459,595 $ 83,035 -- $ 1,336,140
Operating loss from continuing operations* $ (837,442) $ (75,944) $ (113,520) $(14,313,914) $(15,340,820)
Net loss from discontinued operations -- -- -- $ (3,662,553) $ (3,662,553)
Depreciation and amortization from continuing $ 340,482 $ 42,291 $ 25,005 $ 2,672,285 $ 3,080,063
operations
Capital expenditures $ 24,588 -- -- -- $ 24,588
Total assets from discontinued operations -- -- -- $ 1,600,341 $ 1,600,341
Total assets, March 31, 2002 $ 7,133,204 $ 1,272,567 $ 246,597 $ 1,684,695 $ 10,337,063
As of and for the Year Ended March 31, 2001:
Revenue from continuing operations $ 1,731,948 -- $ 178,246 -- $ 1,910,194
Gross profit from continuing operations $ 746,643 -- $ 128,948 -- $ 875,591
Operating loss from continuing operations* $ (3,016,513) -- $ (265,616) $ (7,734,526) $(11,016,655)
Net loss from discontinued operations -- -- -- $ (1,380,166) $ (1,380,166)
Depreciation and amortization from continuing $ 282,832 -- $ 9,208 $ 1,494,474 $ 1,786,514
operations
Capital expenditures $ 223,231 -- -- $ 203,208 $ 426,439
Total assets from discontinued operations -- -- -- $ 2,419,982 $ 2,419,982
Total assets, March 31, 2001 $ 8,894,324 -- $ 1,461,401 $ 11,414,236 $ 21,769,961
61
* Certain corporate marketing, research and development and general and
administrative costs have not been allocated to the segments and have been
included in "Corporate and other".
25. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
QUARTER QUARTER
QUARTER ENDED ENDED QUARTER YEAR ENDED
ENDED JUNE SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31, ENDED MARCH MARCH 31,
30, 2002 2002 2002 31, 2003 2003
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Revenue from continuing
operations $ 614,094 $ 545,937 $ 600,657 $ 583,563 $ 2,344,251
Gross profit (loss) from
continuing operations 394,308 288,412 385,670 346,618 1,415,008
Net loss (1,034,557) (1,229,151) (571,944) (596,698) (3,432,350)
Net loss per common share
basic and diluted $ (0.06) $ (0.07) $ (0.03) $ (0.03) $ (0.19)
QUARTER QUARTER
QUARTER ENDED ENDED QUARTER YEAR ENDED
ENDED JUNE SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31, ENDED MARCH MARCH 31,
30, 2001 2001 2001 31, 2001 2001
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Revenue from continuing
operations $ 436,620 $ 922,506 $ 619,313 $ 552,979 $ 2,531,418
Gross profit (loss) from
continuing operations 202,410 472,550 353,519 307,661 1,336,140
Net loss (3,929,818) (2,676,913) (1,970,399) (9,867,348) (18,444,478)
Net loss per common share
basic and diluted $ (0.24) $ (0.16) $ (0.11) $ (0.58) $ (1.09)
Due to the discontinuation of ADA in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2003, the
amounts listed above will differ from the amounts previously reported in the
Company's Form 10-Qs. (See Note 5, "Discontinued Operations".)
26. STRATEGIC INVESTMENT IN ADA
On January 18, 2002 the Global Beverage Group, "GBG", a Canadian-based direct
store delivery consortium, completed a strategic investment in Semotus' ADA
subsidiary by acquiring a 49% share in ADA.
For its 49% stock purchase, GBG paid Semotus $250,000 in cash and agreed to
invest $1 million in ADA over the next 15 months in order to help with the
development of the next generation of ADA asset tracking and management
software. Additionally, as part of the transaction, GBG assumed a personal loan
of the President of ADA and received the 250,000 shares of Semotus stock
securing the loan. GBG has also received common stock options exercisable into
150,000 shares of Semotus stock at $0.75 per share.
At the end of 15 months, GBG had the option to purchase Semotus' 51% ownership
of ADA for either (i) $2.5 million in cash or (ii) return of the 250,000 shares
of common stock received for assuming the personal loan. The purchase agreement
also carried a price guaranty, for which Semotus issued an additional 250,000
shares (see Note 4, "Acquisitions - Application Design Associates, Inc."). On
May 6, 2003, GBG purchased the remaining 51% of ADA for the return of 500,000
shares of Semotus' common stock. This decision resulted in the discontinuation
of ADA's operations in fiscal year 2003.
27. VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
REDUCTION
AGAINST
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO CHARGED TO BALANCE BALANCE AT
MARCH 31, ACQUIRED COST OF OPERATING SHEET MARCH 31,
2000 BALANCES GOODS SOLD EXPENSES ACCOUNT 2001
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Allowance for doubtful
accounts $ 337 $ 1,059 $ -- $ 76,385 $ (41,814) $ 35,967
REDUCTION
AGAINST
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO CHARGED TO BALANCE BALANCE AT
MARCH 31, ACQUIRED COST OF OPERATING SHEET MARCH 31,
2001 BALANCES GOODS SOLD EXPENSES ACCOUNT 2002
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Allowance for doubtful
accounts $ 35,967 $ -- $ -- $ 169,852 $(139,819) $ 66,000
62
REDUCTION
AGAINST
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO CHARGED TO BALANCE BALANCE AT
MARCH 31, ACQUIRED COST OF OPERATING SHEET MARCH 31,
2003 BALANCES GOODS SOLD EXPENSES ACCOUNT 2003
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Allowance for doubtful
accounts $ 66,000 -- -- $ 15,590 $ (4,500) $ 77,090
28. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On May 1, 2003, Brown Simpson exercised 846,154 warrants by remitting $8,461.54
to Semotus, and Brown Simpson was issued 846,154 shares of common stock.
On May 6, 2003, GBG exercised its option to purchase the remaining 51% of ADA
from Semotus. (See Note 26 - "Strategic Investment in ADA"). As a result, the
ADA operations have been discontinued in fiscal year 2003.
On May 15, 2003, Semotus, Cross Communications, Inc. and Kathleen Wold executed
an Amendment to the Agreement of Merger dated July 10, 2000, whereby Semotus
agreed to issue 187,500 restricted common shares in exchange for the termination
and full settlement of all remaining obligations under the Merger Agreement.
On May 19, 2003, WizShop, Semotus and Earthlink entered into a settlement and
mutual general release agreement, whereby Earthlink shall pay to WizShop a sum
of $210,000. (See Part I, Item 3, "Legal Proceedings")
63
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DATE: JUNE 30, 2003 SEMOTUS SOLUTIONS, INC.
BY: /S/ ANTHONY N. LAPINE
-----------------------------
ANTHONY N. LAPINE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
/S/ ANTHONY N. LAPINE
- ------------------------ CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER JUNE 30, 2003
ANTHONY N. LAPINE AND CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
/S/ CHARLES K. DARGAN II
- ------------------------ CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, JUNE 30, 2003
CHARLES K. DARGAN II TREASURER
/S/ MARK WILLIAMS
- ------------------------ DIRECTOR JUNE 30, 2003
MARK WILLIAMS
/S/ LAURENCE MURRAY
- ------------------------ DIRECTOR JUNE 30, 2003
LAURENCE MURRAY
/S/ ROBERT LANZ
- ------------------------ DIRECTOR AND CHAIRMAN JUNE 30, 2003
ROBERT LANZ OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
64
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Anthony N. LaPine, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K of Semotus Solutions, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: June 30, 2003
/S/ ANTHONY N. LAPINE
- ----------------------------
ANTHONY N. LAPINE
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
65
I, Charles K. Dargan, II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K of Semotus Solutions, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: June 30, 2003
/S/ CHARLES K. DARGAN, II
- --------------------------------
CHARLES K. DARGAN, II
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER