SCHEDULE 14A

                                 (Rule 14a-101)

                     INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
              Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) Securities
                              Exchange Act of 1934
                                (Amendment No. 4)

Filed by the Registrant                              [ ]
Filed by a party other than the Registrant           [X]
         Check the appropriate box:
[ ]      Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ]      Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only
         (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ ]      Definitive Proxy Statement
[X]      Definitive Additional Materials
[ ]      Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12

                     SECURED INVESTMENT RESOURCES FUND, L.P.
                (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

                           Everest Properties II, LLC
                            Millenium Management, LLC
    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X]     No fee required
[ ]     Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
        (1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        (2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transactions applies:
        (3)  Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
             pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which
             the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined.)
        (4)  Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        (5)  Total Fee paid:
[ ]     Fee paid previously with preliminary materials [ ] Check box if any part
        of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
        Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
        was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
        statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
        (1) Amount previously paid:
        (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        (3) Filing party:
        (4) Date filed:






VOTE           VOTE            VOTE          VOTE           VOTE           VOTE

                           Everest Properties II, LLC
                            Millenium Management, LLC
                         155 N. Lake Avenue, Suite 1000
                               Pasadena, CA 91101

                                  July 28, 2004


To the Limited Partners of
Secured Investment Resources Fund, L.P. ("SIR1") and
Secured Investment Resources Fund, L.P. II ("SIR2") (the "Partnerships")

         Re:      Electing a New General Partner - Recent Developments

Dear Limited Partner:

     We wish to  update  you on our  efforts  to  remove  James R.  Hoyt and his
company  as the  general  partners  of your  Partnerships,  and elect  Millenium
Management,  LLC, a California limited liability company  ("Millenium"),  as the
new general partner.

     On July 20,  2004,  the  District  Court of  Johnson  County,  Kansas  (the
"Court"),  ruled that if Mr. Hoyt is left to manage the  Partnerships  and their
assets,  there is clear and imminent danger to the property or proceeds thereof,
and that a receiver should be appointed.  On June 17, 2004, the Court had agreed
to prohibit Mr. Hoyt from taking any further unauthorized cash advances from the
Partnerships;  or selling  any of the  Partnerships'  assets  except the Sunwood
Village  Apartments  in Las Vegas,  Nevada  ("Sunwood"),  which is already under
contract.  In addition,  the Court agreed to require that any proceeds  from the
sale of Sunwood  be paid into the Court  rather  than be left  under Mr.  Hoyt's
control.

     The Court found that there is a  likelihood  of immediate  and  irreparable
harm to the  Partnerships and their unit holders if Mr. Hoyt was left in control
of them. We recently learned, and informed the Court, that Mr. Hoyt allowed SIR2
to default on its  mortgage  payments  for  Sunwood,  and that the  property was
almost lost to a foreclosure  once,  and is still under threat of foreclosure if
the current  purchase  contract is not  consummated.  This new  information  may
explain the reason that Mr. Hoyt agreed to sell  Sunwood  without a  responsible
marketing  effort,  for a price that we believe is  significantly  less than its
full potential.  We believe the mortgage default,  and the resulting pressure to
sell, could have easily been avoided if Mr. Hoyt had not taken $2.5 Million from
SIR2's cash  reserves for  himself.  This is yet another  example of Mr.  Hoyt's
incompetent and self-serving management of the Partnerships.

     Mr. Hoyt recently  sent you letters  admitting  that he took  approximately
$2.5 Million from SIR2,  but failing to  acknowledge  that he has:  violated the
limited partnership  agreement by taking the $2.5 Million,  violated federal and
state laws by failing to disclose that he had taken the $2.5 Million, and failed
to pay SIR2 any interest  whatsoever  since taking the $2.5 Million in 2001.  He
offers no  explanation  of what he did with the $2.5 Million,  no explanation of
his ability to repay the $2.5 Million, and no explanation of his actions.



     As general partner of the  Partnerships,  Millenium will pursue him for the
claims  we  believe  exist:  for  the  money  he has  taken,  for his  waste  of
Partnership  assets and for many  breaches  of  fiduciary  duty and the  limited
partnership  agreements  of the  Partnerships.  We asked the Court to  appoint a
receiver to take control of the  Partnerships,  because we strongly believe that
leaving Mr. Hoyt in control of these  Partnerships  would be the worst  possible
choice for the investors in the  Partnerships - we all need to be protected from
the  potential  that Mr.  Hoyt will  continue  to  mismanage  the  Partnerships,
misprice the Partnerships' assets, and misappropriate the Partnerships' funds.

     Mr. Hoyt has recently  informed us of his position that all transfers  that
have ever occurred in the Partnerships have resulted in the transferee  becoming
only an assignee, as opposed to a substitute limited partner with voting rights.
Mr. Hoyt's position would result in more than half of the  outstanding  units in
each Partnership being held by assignees with no voting rights, which would make
it  impossible  for the  Partnership  to take any actions that  require  limited
partner  approval.  We do not believe Mr. Hoyt's position will withstand a legal
challenge, and we will probably need to bring this issue before the Court before
we can close our Consent Solicitation. We are evaluating our options and, in the
meanwhile,  we are extending the Expiration  Date for the  solicitation to 11:59
p.m.  Pacific  Time  on the  earlier  to  occur  of  the  following  dates  (the
"Expiration  Date"):  (i) August 31, 2004 or such later date to which  Millenium
determines to extend the  solicitation,  and (ii) the date Millenium  determines
that  the  Required   Consents  are  received  (as   described  in  the  Consent
Solicitation Statement).

     If you have not yet voted, please return the Consent form. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact us toll free at (800) 611-4613, or
at (626) 585-5920.

                                     Millenium Management, LLC


                                     /S/ W. Robert Kohorst
                                     ---------------------
                                     W. Robert Kohorst
                                     President