1
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14A-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[X] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission
Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ ] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5) Total fee paid:
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3) Filing Party:
(4) Date Filed:
2
[Granite Logo]
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED
585 WEST BEACH STREET
WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076
------------------------
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
MAY 21, 2001
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of GRANITE
CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), will be held
on May 21, 2001 at 10:30 a.m. local time, at the Embassy Suites, 1441 Canyon Del
Rey, Seaside, California for the following purposes:
1. To elect three (3) directors of the Company for the ensuing three-year
term;
2. To act upon a proposal to amend the Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company to eliminate Article Eighth, which imposes stockholder
super-majority voting requirements for mergers, substantial asset sales
and similar transactions;
3. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the
independent accountants of the Company for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2001; and
4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 6, 2001 are
entitled to notice of, and to vote at, this meeting and any continuations or
adjournments thereof. For ten days prior to the meeting, a complete list of
stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be available for examination
by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the meeting during ordinary
business hours at the Embassy Suites, 1441 Canyon Del Rey, Seaside, California
93955.
WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, WE URGE YOU TO SIGN, DATE
AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE SO THAT
AS MANY SHARES AS POSSIBLE MAY BE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. PROPOSAL 2
REQUIRES APPROVAL OF 66 2/3 PERCENT OF OUR OUTSTANDING SHARES, SO FAILURE TO
RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD OR ABSTAINING FROM VOTING ON PROPOSAL 2 HAS THE
SAME EFFECT AS A VOTE AGAINST PROPOSAL 2. IN ADDITION, APPROVAL OF A CHARTER
AMENDMENT IS A NON-DISCRETIONARY ITEM FOR BROKERS, SO IF YOU HOLD YOUR SHARES IN
A BROKER ACCOUNT AND DO NOT INSTRUCT YOUR BROKER HOW TO VOTE ON PROPOSAL 2, YOUR
BROKER CANNOT VOTE YOUR SHARES AND IT WILL HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS A VOTE
AGAINST PROPOSAL 2.
Please see "Voting Rights" on Page 1 of the accompanying Proxy Statement
for a description of a recent stock split. Please note that the stock split was
effected after the April 6, 2001 record date for the Annual Meeting and thus
does not affect the number of shares outstanding or the stockholders who can
vote as of the April 6, 2001 record date.
The vote of every stockholder is important, and your cooperation in
promptly returning your executed Proxy Card will be appreciated. Each Proxy Card
is revocable and will not affect your right to vote in person in the event that
you decide to attend the meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
[/s/ Michael Futch]
Michael Futch
Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary
Watsonville, California
April , 2001
3
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED
585 WEST BEACH STREET
WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076
------------------------
PROXY STATEMENT
------------------------
2001 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by
the management of GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation
(hereinafter called the "Company"), of Proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on May 21, 2001, or any postponement or adjournment
thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual
Meeting. This Proxy Statement and accompanying Proxy Card are first being sent
to stockholders on approximately April , 2000.
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
The cost of the solicitation of Proxies will be borne by the Company. In
addition to soliciting stockholders by mail through its employees, the Company
may request banks and brokers, and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries,
to solicit their customers who have stock of the Company registered in the name
of such persons and will reimburse them for their reasonable, out-of-pocket
costs. The Company may use the services of its officers, directors and others to
solicit Proxies personally or by telephone, without additional compensation. In
addition, the Company has retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc., a proxy
solicitation firm, to assist in the solicitation of Proxies. Pursuant to the
Company's agreement with MacKenzie, MacKenzie will provide various proxy
advisory and solicitation services for the Company at a cost of $12,500, plus
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and indemnification against certain
liabilities.
VOTING RIGHTS
All shares represented by valid Proxy Cards received prior to the meeting
will be voted and, where a stockholder specifies by means of the Proxy Card a
choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon, the shares will be voted in
accordance with the specifications so made. If no instructions are given on the
executed Proxy Card, the Proxy Card will be voted in favor of the proposals
described and, in the discretion of such Proxies with respect to any other
proposal that may properly come before the Annual Meeting, including a motion to
adjourn the Annual Meeting to another time or place (including for the purpose
of soliciting additional Proxies). A stockholder who signs and returns a Proxy
Card in proper form will have the power to revoke it at any time before it is
voted. A Proxy Card may be revoked by filing with the Secretary of the Company a
written revocation or duly executed Proxy bearing a later date, or by appearing
at the meeting and electing to vote in person. The Company's Bylaws provide that
a majority of the shares entitled to vote, whether present in person or
represented by Proxy Card, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of
business at the meeting. Votes for and against, abstentions and "broker
non-votes" will each be counted as present for purposes of determining the
presence of a quorum.
The voting securities of the Company entitled to vote at the meeting
consist of shares of Common Stock. Only stockholders of record at the close of
business on April 6, 2000 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual
Meeting. On April 6, 2000, there were shares of Common Stock issued
and outstanding. Each stockholder shall have one vote for every share of Common
Stock registered in his or her name on the record date for the meeting.
As initially announced on February 21, 2001, on April 13, 2001 Granite
effected a split of its shares of Common Stock on a three-for-two basis in the
form of a 50 percent stock dividend to stockholders of record on March 31, 2001.
Stockholders are asked to note that the record date for voting at the Annual
Meeting is April 6, 2001 and thus the stockholders and the number of shares that
stockholders are entitled to vote at the
4
Annual Meeting is based on the shares outstanding as of April 6, 2001, and the
record ownership of those shares on that date (i.e., pre-split) as reflected in
the Proxy Cards accompanying this Proxy Statement.
Pursuant to the Bylaws and policies of the Company, in advance of the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, management will appoint an independent Inspector
of Elections to supervise the voting of shares for the Annual Meeting. The
Inspector will decide all questions respecting the qualification of voters, the
validity of the Proxy Cards and the acceptance or rejection of votes. The
Inspector, before entering upon the discharge of his or her duties, shall take
and sign an oath faithfully to execute the duties of Inspector with strict
impartiality and according to the best of his or her ability.
The election of directors shall be determined by a plurality of votes cast,
and except as otherwise provided by law or the Company's Certificate of
Incorporation or Bylaws, all other matters shall be determined by a majority of
the votes cast affirmatively or negatively. Approval of the charter amendment to
eliminate Article Eighth (Proposal 2) requires the affirmative vote by the
holders of 66 2/3 percent of the outstanding Company Common Stock under the
provisions of the Company's charter. Because of this vote requirement,
abstentions will have the same effect as votes against the proposal to amend the
charter. The failure to return a Proxy Card will also have the same effect as a
vote against the charter amendment. Under the rules of the New York Stock
Exchange, brokers who hold shares in street name for customers have the
authority to vote on many "routine" proposals when they have not received voting
instructions from beneficial owners. Under these rules, charter amendments are
not considered "routine" proposals and therefore brokers may not exercise their
voting discretion with respect to the charter amendment, i.e., a "broker
non-vote." Since the affirmation vote of 66 2/3 percent vote of the outstanding
Company Common Stock is required to approve the charter amendment, broker
non-votes will have the same effect as votes against the charter amendment
proposal.
NOMINATION AND ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Company currently has a nine-member Board of Directors. Directors are
elected for three-year terms and are divided into three classes, with one class
elected at each annual meeting of stockholders.
Three (3) directors of the Company are to be elected for the ensuing
three-year term and until their successors are elected and qualified. The
nominees are Rebecca A. McDonald, Brian C. Kelly and George B. Searle. Certain
information with respect to their ages and background is set forth below. Ms.
McDonald was first elected at a Board of Directors' meeting in 1994. Mr. Kelly
and Mr. Searle were appointed by the Board in 1995 and 1998, respectively, to
fill vacant directorships, and their appointments were ratified at the
subsequent annual meetings of stockholders. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A
VOTE "FOR" EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.
Each nominee will hold office until his or her term expires or until his or
her successor is elected and qualified unless he or she resigns or his or her
office becomes vacant by death, removal, or other cause in accordance with the
Bylaws of the Company.
It is intended that votes pursuant to the Proxy Cards will be cast for the
named nominees. The persons named in the accompanying form of Proxy Card will
vote the shares represented thereby for the nominees. Management knows of no
reason why any of these nominees should be unable or unwilling to serve.
However, if any nominee(s) should for any reason be unable or unwilling to
serve, the Proxy Cards will be voted for the election of such other person(s)
for the office of director as the Board may recommend in the place of such
nominee(s).
2
5
If a quorum is present and voting, the three nominees receiving the highest
number of votes will be elected for the ensuing three-year term. Abstentions and
shares held by brokers that are present, but not voted because the brokers were
prohibited from exercising discretionary authority or otherwise, i.e., broker
non-votes, will be counted as present in determining if a quorum is present, but
will have no effect on the vote for directors.
DIRECTOR POSITION AGE DIRECTOR SINCE
-------- -------- --- --------------
NOMINEES
Brian C. Kelly.................... Director 69 Director since 1995; term ends
2001.
Rebecca A. McDonald............... Director 48 Director since 1994; term ends
2001.
George B. Searle.................. Director 68 Director since 1998; term ends
2001.
CONTINUING
David H. Watts.................... Chairman of the Board, 62 Director since 1988; term ends
President, Chief Executive 2002.
Officer, and Director
Joseph J. Barclay................. Director 68 Director since 1988; term ends
2002.
J. Fernando Niebla................ Director 61 Director since 1999; term ends
2002.
Richard M. Brooks................. Director 72 Director since 1990; term ends
2003.
Linda Griego...................... Director 53 Director since 1999; term ends
2003.
Raymond E. Miles.................. Director 68 Director since 1988; term ends
2003.
Granite Construction Incorporated was incorporated in Delaware in January,
1990 as the holding company for Granite Construction Company, which was
incorporated in California in 1922. All dates for people listed in this Proxy
Statement referring to the dates of service with the Company include the periods
in which they served for Granite Construction Company.
NOMINEES
Mr. Kelly is self-employed as a Construction Consultant with over 40 years
of construction experience. He is currently utilizing his business expertise as
a volunteer with The Diocese of Monterey and other community organizations. Mr.
Kelly holds a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from Iowa State University and an
M.B.A. degree from Stanford University.
Ms. McDonald is currently Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Enron
Global Assets. She joined Enron in February 1999 as Executive Managing Director,
and in July of 1999 took the position of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Enron Asia Pacific/Africa/China LLC until the change to her current position in
November of 2000. Prior to joining Enron, Ms. McDonald held a six-year tenure at
Amoco, serving as President and Chief Executive Officer of Amoco Energy
Development Company and Managing Director of Amoco Energy Group North America.
She is a director of the US-ASEAN Business Council and Eagle Global Logistics.
Ms. McDonald holds a B.S. degree in Education from Stephen F. Austin University.
Mr. Searle is currently President of Searle Associates, Inc., consultants
to the construction industry. He was formerly President of IA Construction Co.
of Concordville, Pennsylvania, a leading construction company in the Northeast.
Mr. Searle serves as a director of Barriere Construction Co., L.L.C. and Elwyn
Inc. He holds a B.A. degree in Mathematics from Harvard University.
CONTINUING
Mr. Watts is currently, and has been since 1987, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company. On May 24, 1999 he was elected to also serve
as Chairman of the Board. He was formerly President and Chief Executive Officer
and a director of Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc., an industrial engineering and
construction firm. Mr. Watts currently serves as a director of TIC Holdings,
Inc., Wilder Construction Company, the California Chamber of Commerce, of which
he is the immediate past Chair, Monterey County Symphony, the Monterey Bay Area
Council of the Boy Scouts of America, and the Community Foundation for Monterey
County. He holds a B.A. degree in Economics from Cornell University.
3
6
Mr. Barclay was formerly Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and a
director of Cascade Corporation, a manufacturer of materials handling equipment.
He is a director of Columbia Machine, Inc. Mr. Barclay holds a B.S. degree in
Industrial Engineering from Illinois Institute of Technology.
Mr. Brooks is self-employed as a Financial Consultant. He is a director of
Longs Drug Stores Corporation, BEI Technologies, Inc. and Western Farm Credit
Bank. Mr. Brooks holds a B.S. degree in Applied Economics from Yale University
and an M.B.A. degree from the University of California, Berkeley.
Ms. Griego is President and Chief Executive Officer of Griego Enterprises,
Inc. She was formerly President and Chief Executive Officer of the Los Angeles
Community Development Bank. Ms. Griego is on the Board of Directors of
Blockbuster, Inc., and Tokai Bank of California. She also serves as a Los
Angeles branch director of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. She holds
a B.A. degree in History from the University of California at Los Angeles.
Dr. Miles is the Trefethen Professor Emeritus at the Walter A. Haas School
of Business at the University of California, Berkeley. He has been a member of
the faculty since 1963 and is a former Dean of the School. Dr. Miles is a
director of the Union Bank of California. He holds B.A. and M.B.A. degrees from
the University of North Texas and a Ph.D. in Organizational Behavior and
Industrial Relations from Stanford University.
Mr. Niebla is President of International Technology Partners L.L.C., an IT
services company based in Miami, Florida. He was the founder and Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of Infotec Development Inc. from 1979 through June 1996,
and Infotec Commercial Systems from January 1996 through June 1998. Mr. Niebla
is a director of Union Bank of California, Infotec Commercial Systems and
Pacific Life Corp. He holds a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the
University of Arizona and an M.S. QBA from the University of Southern
California.
The Company has an Audit/Compliance Committee, a Compensation Committee, a
Nominating Committee, a Strategic Planning Committee, and an Executive
Committee.
AUDIT/COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE
Richard M. Brooks, Chairman
Joseph J. Barclay
Linda Griego
Brian C. Kelly
Rebecca A. McDonald
Raymond E. Miles
J. Fernando Niebla
George B. Searle
For a description of the functions of the Audit/Compliance Committee, see
"Report of the Audit/ Compliance Committee". The Audit/Compliance Committee is
composed entirely of non-employee directors. The Audit/Compliance Committee held
three (3) meetings in 2000.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Joseph J. Barclay
Richard M. Brooks
Brian C. Kelly
George B. Searle
4
7
The Compensation Committee reviews and recommends salaries for corporate
officers and key employees. In addition, the Compensation Committee administers
the 1990 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan and the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan
with respect to persons subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. The Compensation Committee is composed entirely of non-employee directors.
The Compensation Committee held three (3) meetings in 2000. For additional
information concerning the Compensation Committee, see "Report of the
Compensation Committee."
NOMINATING COMMITTEE
Joseph J. Barclay
Richard M. Brooks
Brian C. Kelly
Raymond E. Miles
George B. Searle
The Nominating Committee recommends and nominates persons to serve on the
Board of Directors. The Committee will consider nominees recommended by
stockholders as long as the stockholder gives timely notice in writing of his or
her intent to nominate a director. To be timely, a stockholder nomination for a
director to be elected at the 2002 Annual Meeting must be received at the
Company's principal office on or before , 2001. The Nominating
Committee held no meetings in fiscal year 2000.
STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE
Raymond E. Miles
Rebecca A. McDonald
Linda Griego
Brian C. Kelly
J. Fernando Niebla
George B. Searle
The function of the Strategic Planning Committee is to develop, in
conjunction with management, the Company's Strategic Plan and to provide overall
strategic planning direction for the Company. The Strategic Planning Committee
held one (1) meeting in fiscal year 2000.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
David H. Watts, Chairman
Joseph J. Barclay
Brian C. Kelly
The Executive Committee's responsibility is to exercise all powers and
authority of the Board of Directors in the management of business affairs of the
Company as authorized by the Board. The Committee reviews and approves specific
decisions as established by the current "Limits of Authority" schedule. It may
exercise the power and authority of the Board of Directors to declare a
dividend, authorize the issuance of stock or to adopt a certificate of ownership
and merger pursuant to Section 253 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
Members of the Executive Committee do not receive any meeting fees or other
compensation for their service on the Committee.
During fiscal year 2000, the Board of Directors held six (6) meetings. All
Directors attended 75% of the meetings of the Board or any committee on which he
or she served.
5
8
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The following table contains information as of March 31, 2001 regarding the
ownership of the Common Stock of the Company by: (i) all persons who, to the
knowledge of the Company, were the beneficial owners of 5% or more of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company, (ii) each director and
director nominee of the Company, (iii) the Chief Executive Officer and the four
other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company as of March 31,
2001, whose salary and bonus for the fiscal year ended exceeded $100,000, and
(iv) all executive officers and directors of the Company as a group:
AMOUNT AND NATURE PERCENT OF
OF BENEFICIAL COMMON STOCK
NAME OWNERSHIP(1) OUTSTANDING(2)
---- ----------------- --------------
Emben & Co. (ESOP Trust).................................... [ ] [ %]
c/o BNY Western Trust Company
One Wall Street
New York, NY 10286
Vanguard/PRIMECAP Fund Inc.(3).............................. 2,100,000 [ %]
P.O. Box 2600 #V34
Valley Forge, PA 19482
Wellington Management Company, LLP(4)....................... 1,368,400 [ %]
75 State Street, 19th Floor
Boston, MA 02109
David H. Watts(5)........................................... [ ] *
Joseph J. Barclay........................................... [ ] *
Richard M. Brooks........................................... [ ] *
Linda Griego................................................ [ ] *
Brian C. Kelly.............................................. [ ] *
Rebecca A. McDonald......................................... [ ] *
Raymond E. Miles............................................ [ ] *
J. Fernando Niebla.......................................... [ ] *
George B. Searle............................................ [ ] *
William G. Dorey(6)......................................... [ ] *
William E. Barton(7)........................................ [ ] *
Patrick M. Costanzo(8)...................................... [ ] *
Mark E. Boitano(9).......................................... [ ] *
All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (13
Persons)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)................................... [ ] [ %]
- ---------------
* Less than 1%.
(1) Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons named in the
table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of
Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community
property laws where applicable.
(2) Calculated on the basis of [ ] shares of Common Stock outstanding
as of March 31, 2001, except that shares of Common Stock underlying options
exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2001 are deemed outstanding for
purposes of calculating the beneficial ownership of Common Stock of the
holders of such options.
(3) Based upon a Schedule 13G filed by Vanguard/PRIMECAP Fund Inc. with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 9, 2001.
(4) Based upon a Schedule 13G filed by Wellington Management Company, LLP
("WMC") with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2001.
WMC has shared dispositive power over the shares listed in its capacity as
an investment advisor. WMC also has shared voting power with respect to
926,700 of such shares.
6
9
(5) Includes approximately [ ] shares of Common Stock owned by the
Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") but allocated to Mr. Watts' account
as of March 31, 2001, over which Mr. Watts has voting, but not dispositive
power, as of March 31, 2001. These shares are subject to vesting and
distribution restrictions.
(6) Includes approximately [ ] shares of Common Stock owned by the
Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") but allocated to Mr. Dorey's account
as of March 31, 2001, and [ ] shares of restricted stock over which
Mr. Dorey has voting, but not dispositive power, as of March 31, 2001. These
shares are subject to vesting and distribution restrictions.
(7) Includes approximately [ ] shares of Common Stock owned by the
Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") but allocated to Mr. Barton's account
as of March 31, 2001, and [ ] shares of restricted stock over which
Mr. Barton has voting, but not dispositive power, as of March 31, 2001.
These shares are subject to vesting and distribution restrictions.
(8) Includes approximately [ ] shares of Common Stock owned by the
Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") but allocated to Mr. Costanzo's
account as of March 31, 2001, over which Mr. Costanzo has voting, but not
dispositive power, as of March 31, 2001. These shares are subject to vesting
and distribution restrictions.
(9) Includes approximately [ ] shares of Common Stock owned by the
Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") but allocated to Mr. Boitano's
account as of March 31, 2001, and [ ] shares of restricted stock
over which Mr. Boitano has voting, but not dispositive power, as of March
31, 2001. These shares are subject to vesting and distribution restrictions.
7
10
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER MATTERS
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth a summary of compensation as to the Chief
Executive Officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers
as of December 31, 2000, whose salary and bonus exceeded $100,000 for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2000:
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG TERM
COMPENSATION
AWARDS
------------
ANNUAL COMPENSATION(1) RESTRICTED
---------------------------- STOCK ALL OTHER
SALARY BONUS(2) AWARDS(3) COMPENSATION(4)
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR ($) ($) ($) ($)
- ----------------------------------- ---- -------- -------- ------------ ---------------
David H. Watts..................... 2000 [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Chairman of the Board, 1999 330,000 330,000 710,185 35,976
President and Chief Executive 1998 300,000 300,000 530,865 33,713
Officer
William G. Dorey................... 2000 [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Executive Vice President 1999 240,000 240,000 516,519 35,976
and Chief Operating Officer 1998 200,000 280,000 283,128 32,592
William E. Barton.................. 2000 [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Senior Vice President and 1999 186,000 149,000 239,964 35,976
Chief Financial Officer 1998 165,000 126,000 171,644 32,592
Patrick M. Costanzo................ 2000 [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Senior Vice President and 1999 200,000 280,000 344,329 35,976
Manager, Heavy Construction 1998 200,000 280,000 364,109 32,592
Division
Mark E. Boitano.................... 2000 [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Senior Vice President and 1999 200,000 280,000 344,329 35,976
Manager, Branch Division 1998 150,000 210,000 212,346 32,592
- ---------------
(1) For the year ended December 31, 2000, compensation deferred at the election
of the officer under the Key Management Deferred Compensation Plan for
Messrs. Watts, Dorey, Barton, Costanzo and Boitano was $[ ];
$[ ]; $[ ]; [ ]$; and $[ ], respectively. For the
year ended December 31, 1999 such deferred compensation amounted to
$351,305; $80,649; $7,000; $98,087 and $22,255, respectively, while for the
year ended December 31, 1998 such deferred compensation amounted to
$300,531; $265,264; $6,000; $289,070 and $6,000 respectively.
(2) Amounts include cash bonuses earned in the current year but paid in the
following year. Amounts do not include cash bonuses paid in the current year
but earned in the previous year.
(3) The amount of awards for each year is based on the Company's stock closing
price on the grant date multiplied by the number of shares awarded for the
year. Such awards are earned in the current year but issued as stock in the
following year. The aggregate number of restricted shares outstanding at
December 31, 2000 for Messrs. Watts, Dorey, Barton, Costanzo, and Boitano
were [ ]; [ ]; [ ]; [ ]; and [ ],
respectively, with an aggregate market value for those same officers of
$[ ]; $[ ]; $[ ]; $[ ]; and $[ ],
respectively, based on the Company's stock closing price of $28.9375 at
December 29, 2000 (the last NYSE trading day in 2000). The number of shares
and values for each officer at December 31, 2000 exclude the shares issued
in March 2001 for services performed in 2000 which appear in the table as
2000 compensation.
In 1999 restricted stock agreements were amended to change the vesting for
all participants who had attained retirement age as defined by the Plan to
conform to the requirements under the Internal Revenue Code Section 83. As
a result of these amendments, Messrs. Watts' and Costanzo's shares all
8
11
vested in 2000. The following tables show the total number of shares
awarded Messrs. Barton and Dorey in grant years 1998, 1999 and 2000 and the
vesting schedules for those shares:
WILLIAM E. BARTON
TOTAL
SHARES 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
GRANT DATE AWARDED VESTING VESTING VESTING VESTING VESTING VESTING VESTING
---------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
2000 ............ 9,319 -- -- 1,864 1,864 1,864 1,864 1,863
1999 ............ 7,304 1,096 364 1,461 1,461 1,461 1,461 --
1998 ............ 7,513 2,630 374 1,503 1,503 1,503 -- --
------ ----- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Totals........... 24,136 3,726 738 4,828 4,828 4,828 3,325 1,863
WILLIAM G. DOREY
TOTAL
SHARES 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
GRANT DATE AWARDED VESTING VESTING VESTING VESTING VESTING VESTING VESTING
---------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
2000 ............ 20,059 -- -- 4,012 4,012 4,012 4,012 4,011
1999 ............ 12,048 1,807 601 2,410 2,410 2,410 2,410 --
1998 ............ 17,779 6,223 888 3,556 3,556 3,556 -- --
------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Totals........... 49,886 8,030 1,489 9,978 9,978 9,978 6,422 1,863
None of Mr. Boitano's restricted stock awarded in years 1998, 1999, and
2000 vests within three (3) years of the date of grant.
- ---------------
(4) Amounts represent contributions to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan, the
Profit Sharing and 401(K) Plan and a profit sharing cash bonus that were
earned during the current year, of which a portion was allocated in the
following year. 1998 amounts were restated in 1999 to conform to the 1999
presentation.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND CHANGE OF CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
In April, 1990, Granite Construction Company, a subsidiary of the Company
("Granite"), entered into employment agreements with William E. Barton, Mark E.
Boitano, Patrick M. Costanzo, William G. Dorey, and David H. Watts. Effective
February 1, 1997 the employment agreements entered into with Messrs. Barton,
Boitano, Costanzo, Dorey, and Watts were formally assigned to, and the
obligations thereunder accepted by, the Company. These agreements provide that
if the individual's employment with the Company is terminated for certain
reasons within two and one-half years after a "change in control" of the
Company, then the Company will pay to the individual amounts up to three times
the average gross annual compensation paid to the individual over the five years
prior to the "change in control." A "change in control" is defined as (i) a
merger, consolidation or acquisition of the Company where the stockholders of
the Company do not retain a majority interest in the surviving or acquiring
corporation; (ii) the transfer of substantially all of the Company's assets to a
corporation not controlled by the Company or its stockholders; or (iii) the
transfer to affiliated persons of more than 30% of the voting stock of the
Company, leading to a change of a majority of the members of the Board of
Directors.
Also in the event of a "change in control," options and grants of
restricted stock ("Awards") awarded under the 1990 Omnibus Stock and Incentive
Plan and the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plans") are affected. The Plans
provide that the surviving, successor, or acquiring corporation shall either
assume outstanding Awards or substitute new Awards having an equivalent value.
In the event that does not occur, the Company's Board shall provide that any
Awards otherwise unexercisable and/or unvested shall be immediately exercisable
and vested in full. The Plans further provide that if such newly exercisable or
vested Awards have not been exercised as of the date of the change in control,
they shall terminate effective as of the date of the change in control.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's
executive officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of
the Company's Common Stock to file initial
9
12
reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Such persons are required by SEC regulations to
furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms filed by such
persons.
Based solely on the Company's review of such forms furnished to the Company
and written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believes
that all filing requirements applicable to the Company's executive officers,
directors and more than 10% stockholders were complied with except that, due to
an in-house administrative error, one (1) transaction by David H. Watts was not
timely filed.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
On December 30, 1999, Executive Officers David H. Watts, Patrick M.
Costanzo, William G. Dorey and William E. Barton received loans from the Company
for tax withholding due upon receipt of restricted stock. The largest aggregate
amount of indebtedness outstanding at any time during the loan period for the
officers was $346,327 (paid in full on March 29, 2000), $227,392 (paid in full
on March 31, 2000), $332,906 (paid in full on March 29, 2000), and $318,337
(paid in full on March 29, 2000), respectively. The rate of interest on the
loans was 5.74%. In addition, on February 3, 2000, Mr. Watts received a loan for
tax withholding due upon receipt of restricted stock totaling, in the aggregate,
$585,489 which was paid in full on May 10, 2000. The rate of interest on Mr.
Watt's loan was 6.20%, and after March 31, 2000 increased to 10%. Interest rates
on loans paid by March 31, 2000 were based on applicable federate rates,
compounded annually. After March 31st, interest was calculated at a 60-day
reference rate charged by Bank of America NT & SA plus one percent (1%).
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
Mr. Watts receives $250 for each month he serves as Chairman of the Board
of the Company. Messrs. Barclay, Brooks, Kelly, Miles, Niebla, Searle, and Ms.
Griego and McDonald currently receive an annual retainer of $20,000, payable
quarterly, for serving on the Board. In addition, Messrs. Barclay, Brooks,
Kelly, Miles, Niebla, Searle and Ms. Griego and McDonald receive $800 for each
Board of Directors meeting they attend and $600 for each Board of Directors
committee meeting (except for meetings of the Executive Committee) they attend.
The 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, passed at the 1999 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, provides that each non-employee director must elect, generally
prior to the start of the applicable calendar year, to receive director fee
awards during such year in the form of either an Option Payment or a Stock Units
Payment. Each non-employee director must receive at least 50% of the value of
all compensation for services as a director in the form of a stock-based
director fee award in lieu of receipt of cash. A non-employee director may elect
to receive 100% of director compensation in the form of a director fee award. A
non-employee director electing to receive an Option Payment will be granted
automatically on the last day of each calendar quarter during the year a
nonstatutory stock option for a number of shares of Common Stock. The amount of
shares granted is determined by dividing the Elected Quarterly Compensation by
an amount equal to 50% of the average closing price of a share of the Company's
Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the ten trading days preceding
the date of grant and having an exercise price per share equal to 50% of such
average closing price.
A non-employee director electing to receive a Stock Units Payment will be
granted automatically on the last day of each calendar quarter during the year
an award for a number of stock units. The amount of the award is determined by
dividing the Elected Quarterly Compensation by an amount equal to the average
closing price of a share of the Company's Common Stock on the New York Stock
Exchange on the ten trading days preceding the date of grant. A stock unit is an
unfunded bookkeeping entry representing a right to receive one share of the
Common Stock of the Company in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
Stock Units Award. Non-employee directors are not required to pay any additional
cash consideration in connection with the settlement of the Stock Units Award.
10
13
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the annual percentage change in
the cumulative total return on the Company's Common Stock with the cumulative
total return of the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Heavy Construction Industry Index
(Dycom Industries, Emcor, Granite Construction Incorporated, Fluor, Insituform
Technologies, Jacobs Engineering, Massey Energy, and Washington Group
International) for the period commencing on December 31, 1995, and ending on
December 31, 2000.
The graph assumes $100 invested on December 31, 1995 in the Company's stock
at $31.50 per share, and in the S&P 500 Index, and Dow Jones Construction
Industry Index. The Total Return also assumes reinvestment of dividends.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED, THE S&P 500 INDEX
AND THE DOW JONES HEAVY CONSTRUCTION INDEX
[PERFORMANCE GRAPH]
* $100 INVESTED ON 12/31/95 IN STOCK OR INDEX-
INCLUDING REINVESTMENT OF DIVIDENDS.
FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/95 12/96 12/97 12/98 12/99 12/00
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Granite
Construction Inc. 100.00 92.14 113.52 251.81 140.70 224.75
S&P 500 100.00 122.96 163.98 210.84 255.22 231.98
DJ Heavy
Construction 100.00 96.04 72.15 86.26 92.51 108.34
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11
14
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
Messrs. Barclay, Brooks, Kelly and Searle served as members of the
Compensation Committee during fiscal 2000. All Committee members are
non-employee directors.
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee is responsible for formulating the Company's
executive compensation policy. The Committee reviews, adopts and administers
incentive compensation plans applicable to executive officers and other senior
management personnel, with the intention of providing both competitive and
appropriate levels of compensation.
The Committee's primary compensation policy is that a substantial portion
of the annual compensation of each executive should be directly linked to the
performance of the Company. In addition, compensation should link the long-term
interests of executives and stockholders and encourage career service by
including stock ownership as an integral part of the compensation package.
The Committee has, on occasion, retained the services of compensation
consultants to assist the Committee in developing and maintaining a competitive
executive compensation program. Hewitt Associates, for example, has regularly
provided the Compensation Committee information comparing the Company's
executive compensation to certain companies in the construction industry,
including companies in the Dow Jones Heavy Construction Group.
The Committee has considered the potential impact of Section 162 (m) (the
"Section") of the Internal Revenue Code adopted under the Federal Reserve
Reconciliation Act of 1933. This Section disallows a tax deduction for any
publicly-held corporation for individual compensation exceeding $1 million in
any taxable year for any named executive officers, unless such compensation is
subject to performance-based exemptions. Since all of the targeted compensation
of each of the named executive officers is performance-based, the exemption
applies and this Section will not materially, if at all, reduce the tax
deduction available to the Company.
The Company's compensation package includes salary and annual incentive
compensation comprised of bonuses payable in cash or restricted stock. Following
a review of officer salaries, the Compensation Committee recommended that
effective January 1, 2000, CEO David H. Watts' salary be increased from $330,000
to $360,000.
The incentive compensation plan is designed so that when bonuses exceed a
predetermined cap on total annual cash compensation, the amount in excess of the
cap is converted into long-term compensation in the form of restricted stock.
Restricted stock limits have also been established by the Committee to fix total
compensation limits at appropriate levels. The Committee determined the
appropriate participation of officers as well as the performance threshold, cash
caps, and restricted stock limits for all officers in 2000. Effective January 1,
2000, CEO Watts' cash limit was increased to $720,000 and his total compensation
limit to $1,440,000.
The Committee continued the Return on Net Assets (RONA) based compensation
plan in 2000 for Corporate Officers and Middle Managers. The Committee believes
that using RONA as the key performance factor ties earnings performance to the
Company's asset growth and asset utilization compared with the cost of capital,
and that RONA is a superior measure of performance in an asset-heavy business.
For the Branch and Heavy Construction Division officers, the Committee assigned
performance measures both at the Corporate and Division Level. Thirty percent
(30%) of their incentive compensation was determined in 2000 by Corporate RONA,
while 70% of their incentive compensation was based on the profitability of
their respective Divisions.
Due to provisions in Granite's Retirement Plan, which fully vests
participants at age 62, CEO Watts elected to receive cash in lieu of Common
Stock as part of his 2000 performance incentive, which will be converted to
phantom shares and held in Mr. Watts' Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
account for five (5) years. The Compensation Committee endorsed this handling of
the stock portion of the incentive plan as it
12
15
was consistent with IRS constructive receipt regulations, and it continues to
place the amount awarded at the risk of stockholder value. The Committee
believes Mr. Watts' compensation for the year ending December 31, 2000 reflects
the Company's performance and was in the general range of compensation for
executives with like responsibilities in comparable companies and industries
achieving similar financial results.
The Committee met three (3) times in 2000.
Joseph J. Barclay Brian C. Kelly
Richard M. Brooks George B. Searle
REPORT OF THE AUDIT/COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE
The Board of Directors maintains an Audit/Compliance Committee composed of
eight outside directors who have been determined to be independent under the
rules of the New York Stock Exchange. The primary responsibility of the
Audit/Compliance Committee is to oversee the Company's financial reporting,
corporate governance (including compliance with regulatory matters), and
internal operating controls and to report its observations and activities to the
Board. The Board has adopted a written Charter of the Audit/Compliance
Committee, a copy of which is attached as Appendix B hereto.
Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and
the reporting process including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling
its oversight responsibilities, the committee reviewed the audited financial
statements in the Annual Report with management including a discussion of the
quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the
reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the
financial statements.
The committee reviewed with the independent auditors, who are responsible
for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial
statements with generally accepted accounting principles, their judgments as to
the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company's accounting principles
and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the committee under
generally accepted auditing standards, including Statement on Auditing Standards
No. 61. In addition, the committee has discussed with the independent auditors
the auditors' independence from management and the Company including the matters
in the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required
by the Independence Standards Board, Standard No. 1.
The committee discussed with the Company's independent auditors the overall
scope and plans for their audit. The committee meets with the independent
auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their
examination, their evaluation of the Company's internal controls, and the
overall quality of the Company's financial reporting. The Company incurred the
following fees for services performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in fiscal
year 2000.
AUDIT FEES
Fees for the fiscal year 2000 audit and the review of Forms 10-Q were
$318,000.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION FEES
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP did not render any services related to financial
information systems design and implementation for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2000.
ALL OTHER FEES
Aggregate fees billed for all other services rendered by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 were
$72,000.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the committee
recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board has approved) that the
audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 for filing with the Securities
and
13
16
Exchange Commission. The committee and the Board have also recommended, subject
to stockholder approval, the selection of the Company's independent auditors.
The committee also oversees the Ethics and Compliance Program including
participation in the annual evaluation of the Compliance Officer and giving a
detailed annual report to the Board on the progress of the Program and plans for
future activities.
The committee held three (3) meetings in 2000.
Richard M. Brooks, Chairman Rebecca A. McDonald
Joseph J. Barclay Raymond E. Miles
Linda Griego J. Fernando Niebla
Brian C. Kelly George B. Searle
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
ELIMINATION OF STOCKHOLDER SUPER-MAJORITY VOTING PROVISIONS RELATING TO MERGERS,
SUBSTANTIAL ASSET SALES AND SIMILAR TRANSACTIONS
The Company's Board of Directors has unanimously approved, recommends and
deems it advisable that the stockholders approve an amendment to the Certificate
of Incorporation of the Company to eliminate Article Eighth.
Article Eighth of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation contains
super-majority voting provisions. The provisions of Article Eighth have been in
the Company's Certificate of Incorporation for a number of years. Under Article
Eighth, even those mergers in which the Company is the surviving entity, sales
of subsidiaries of the Company or their assets and acquisitions by the Company
or its subsidiaries require 66 2/3 percent stockholder approval. The Board
believes that these provisions are significantly more burdensome than the
provisions that are generally applicable to publicly-traded Delaware
corporations. For example, Article Eighth imposes a requirement of 66 2/3
percent stockholder approval for some acquisitions by the Company, which would
not generally need any stockholder approval under Delaware law and the rules of
the New York Stock Exchange.
Furthermore, the Board believes that the super-majority requirements make
it easier, for example, for holders of a minority of shares to "block" an
acquisition. Article Eighth allows holders of 34 percent of the Company's Common
Stock to prevent such transactions even if the Board and a majority of the
Company's stockholders believe it is in the best interest of the Company and its
stockholders.
The Board also believes that the requirement of 66 2/3 percent stockholder
approval potentially increases the time it takes, for example, to complete a
merger and substantially increases the cost of the transaction. Moreover, the
time delay and additional contingencies imposed by these restrictions make the
Company a less desirable buyer for many acquisition targets, when other
potential buyers are not subjected to such restrictions.
For these reasons and the reasons described below under "Reasons for
Proposed Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation", the Board has come to
the conclusion that the provisions of Article Eighth place undesirable
restrictions on the ability of the Company to successfully negotiate
transactions that the Board believes are in the best interests of the Company
and its stockholders. The Board has therefore authorized an amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation, subject to approval of stockholders, to eliminate
Article Eighth in its entirety.
14
17
AMENDMENT OF THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
The amendment for the Certificate of Incorporation eliminates the
requirement for approval by 66 2/3 percent of the combined voting power of the
Company for:
(1) any merger, reorganization or consolidation of or share exchange made
by the Company or any of its subsidiaries into or with any other person, in each
case irrespective of whether the Company or its subsidiary is the surviving
entity, provided, however, that the holders of a majority of the combined voting
power of the outstanding shares of all classes and series of the Company
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors may approve any
transaction, including a merger or consolidation, in which the Company pays less
than $20,000,000 in cash, assets or securities (including securities of the
Company) for the assets or securities of a third party; or
(2) except in the ordinary course of business, any sale, lease, exchange,
mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition to or with any other person (in
a single transaction or a series of related transactions) of all or a
Substantial Part (as hereinafter defined) of the assets of the Company
(including without limitation any securities of a subsidiary); or
(3) except in the ordinary course of business, any sale, lease, exchange,
mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition to or with the Company or to or
with any of its subsidiaries (in a single transaction or series of related
transactions) of the assets or securities of any other person if the fair market
value of such assets or securities would constitute a Substantial Part of the
assets of the Company; or
(4) any agreement, contract or other arrangement providing for any of the
transactions described in this definition of Business Combination. Anything in
the foregoing to the contrary notwithstanding, the term "Business Combination"
shall not be deemed to include any of the transactions contemplated by that
certain Credit Agreement or that certain Business Loan Agreement, both dated as
of February 27, 1985, between Granite Construction Company and Bank of America
N.T. & S.A., or any renewals, extensions or refundings thereof; or
(5) the adoption of any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution
of the Company.
The term "Substantial Part" means more than 20% of the fair market value of
the total consolidated assets of the Corporation and its subsidiaries taken as a
whole, as determined by two-thirds of the members of the Board of Directors of
such person in good faith, as of the end of its most recent fiscal year ending
prior to the time the determination is being made.
The terms "Business Combination" means any transaction or proposed
transaction which is referred to in any one or more of the foregoing
subparagraphs (1) through (5).
REASONS FOR PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
The Board believes that the super-majority requirements of Article Eighth
give holders of a minority of shares unequal influence over important and
fundamental corporate matters by allowing them to "block" any and all such
transactions. To illustrate, under Article Eighth, holders of 34 percent of the
Company's Common Stock can prevent transactions, such as acquisitions by the
Company or any of its subsidiaries, the sale of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries, the sale of more than 20% of the assets of the Company or its
subsidiaries, or a merger of the Company or any of its subsidiaries with or into
a third party, even if the Board and a majority of the Company's stockholders
believe such a transaction is in the best interest of the Company and its
stockholders.
The Board also believes that because Article Eighth imposes a 66 2/3
percent stockholder approval threshold for certain transactions, this provision
places an undesirable restriction on the ability of the Company to successfully
negotiate transactions that the Board believes are in the best interest of the
Company and its stockholders. The Board believes that these provisions subject
potential mergers, substantial asset sales and similar transactions involving
the Company or its subsidiaries to a level of stockholder approval that exceeds
what other publicly traded companies are required to achieve under Delaware law
or the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. For example, Article Eighth
currently imposes a requirement of 66 2/3 percent
15
18
stockholder approval for some acquisitions by the Company which generally would
not need any stockholder approval under Delaware law or the rules of the New
York Stock Exchange. Obtaining 66 2/3 stockholder approval also makes it
difficult to do many transactions in a timely and economic manner. The Board
also believes that this requirement makes the Company a much less desirable
buyer in the viewpoint of many acquisition targets when other potential buyers
are not hindered by the same restrictions. The Board believes that the proposed
amendment to eliminate these restrictions is appropriate and advisable and will
enable the Company to more effectively pursue transactions that the Board
believes are desirable for the Company and its stockholders. The amendment is
not being proposed in connection with any particular transaction or negotiations
to which the Company is a party.
EFFECT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
If this Proposal 2 is approved by the stockholders, Delaware General
Corporation Law (or in the case of the Company's subsidiaries, their state of
incorporation) and the rules of the New York Stock Exchange will govern whether
stockholder approval is required for any of the transactions currently covered
by Article Eighth of the Certificate of Incorporation. Under current Delaware
law, any merger in which the Company was not the surviving corporation or any
sale of all or substantially all of the Company's assets would require approval
of (1) the board and (2) a majority (rather than 66 2/3 percent) of the voting
power of the Company's then-outstanding securities entitled to vote. Mergers in
which the Company was the surviving entity, sales of subsidiaries of the Company
or their assets and acquisitions by the Company or its subsidiaries and other
transactions of the type described in Article Eighth would not generally require
approval by the Company's stockholders, except in cases where an amount of the
Company's stock equal to or in excess of 20% of the then-outstanding number of
shares of the Company's stock would be issued in the merger or acquisition. The
text of the proposed amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation is set forth
in Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.
Because the effect of the proposed amendment would be to replace the
special stockholder voting requirements of Article Eighth with the standards
imposed by Delaware law and the New York Stock Exchange:
- the determination of whether a stockholder vote will be required for
transactions currently governed by Article Eighth will be determined
under rules that provide, as indicated above, that, except in certain
limited cases, stockholders do not have a vote at all on those
transactions; and
- in those cases where stockholders will have a vote, the vote required to
approve those transactions will be a majority of the outstanding shares
rather than 66 2/3 percent of the outstanding shares.
One effect of this proposed amendment will be that holders of 50.1 percent
of the Company's outstanding shares will be able to cause the approval of any
transaction that requires shareholder approval under Delaware law and the New
York Stock Exchange rules even if a substantial minority of the outstanding
shares vote against the transaction.
The text of the proposed amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation is
set forth in Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
A VOTE "FOR" THIS PROPOSAL.
VOTE REQUIRED
In accordance with the Articles of Incorporation, the affirmative vote of
66 2/3 percent of the outstanding shares of Common Stock is required to approve
this proposal.
RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
The Board of Directors of the Company has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP to serve as independent accountants to audit the financial statements of the
Company for fiscal 2001. Coopers &
16
19
Lybrand, L.L.P., predecessor to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, has acted in such
capacity since its appointment for fiscal 1982. A representative of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting, will be given
the opportunity to make a statement if the representative desires and will be
available to respond to appropriate questions. The affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes cast affirmatively or negatively at the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders at which a quorum is present and voting either in person or by
Proxy is required for approval of this proposal. Votes for and against,
abstentions and "broker non-voter" will each be counted as present for purposes
of determining a quorum. Neither abstention nor "broker non-voter" will be
counted as having been cast affirmatively or negatively on the proposal.
In the event that ratification by the stockholders of the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent accountants is not
obtained, the Board of Directors will reconsider said appointment.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
A VOTE "FOR" THIS PROPOSAL.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS TO BE PRESENTED
AT 2002 ANNUAL MEETING
Under the Company's Bylaws, nominations for election to the Board of
Directors and proposals for other business to be transacted by the stockholders
at an annual meeting of stockholders may be made by a stockholder (as distinct
from the Company) only if such stockholder: (i) is entitled to vote at the
meeting; (ii) has given the required notice; and (iii) was a stockholder of
record at the time of giving the required notice. In addition, business other
than a nomination for election to the Board must be a proper matter for
stockholder action under the Delaware General Corporation Law.
The required notice: (i) must be in writing; (ii) must contain information
specified in the Bylaws, and (iii) must be delivered to the Company's principal
executive offices not less than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the
date the Company's Proxy Statement for the preceding year's Annual Meeting of
Stockholders was released to stockholders. If, however, no meeting was held in
the previous year; the date of the Annual Meeting is changed by more than 30
days from the previous year; or in the event of a special meeting, the notice,
to be timely, must be delivered by the close of business on the 10th day
following the day on which notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or
public announcement of the date of the meeting was made.
Separate and apart from the required notice described in the preceding
paragraphs, the rules promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 entitle a Company stockholder to require the Company to include the
stockholder proposal in the Proxy materials distributed by the Company. However,
those SEC rules do not require the Company to include in its Proxy materials any
nomination for election to the Board (or any other office with the Company),
impose other limitations on the content of a stockholder proposal, and also
contain eligibility, timeliness, and other requirements (including the
requirement that the proponent must have continuously held at least $2,000 in
market value or 1% of the Company Common Stock for at least one year before the
proposal is submitted by the proponent).
To be considered as satisfying the timeliness requirement of the Company's
Bylaw provisions and the SEC rules in connection with the Proxy materials to be
distributed by the Company with respect to the 2002 Annual Meeting, stockholder
proposals must be submitted to the Secretary of the Company at the Company's
principal executive offices not later than , 2001.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
Certain information required by Item 13(a) of Schedule 14A is incorporated
by reference to the Company's 2000 Annual Report to Stockholders mailed on
approximately April , 2001.
17
20
TRANSACTION OF OTHER BUSINESS
As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the only business which management
intends to present or knows that others will present at the meeting has been
included within this Proxy Statement. If any other matter or matters are
properly brought before the meeting, or any adjournment thereof, it is the
intention of the persons named in the accompanying form of Proxy Card to vote
the Proxy Card on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.
/s/ Michael Futch
Michael Futch
Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary
Dated: April , 2001
18
21
APPENDIX A
TEXT OF STOCKHOLDER SUPER-MAJORITY VOTING PROVISION
Set forth below is the current text of Article Eighth of the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Company:
EIGHTH: Vote Required for Certain Business Combinations. In addition to any
affirmative vote required by law, any other provisions of this Certificate of
Incorporation or otherwise, none of the following transactions shall be
consummated unless and until such transaction shall have been approved by the
affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3 percent of the combined
voting power of the outstanding shares of stock of all classes and series of the
Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors:
(1) any merger, reorganization or consolidation of or share exchange made
by the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries into or with any other person, in
each case irrespective of whether the Corporation or its subsidiary is the
surviving entity, provided, however, that the holders of a majority of the
combined voting power of the outstanding shares of all classes and series of the
Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors may approve
any transaction, including a merger or consolidation, in which the Corporation
pays less than $20,000,000 in cash, assets or securities (including securities
of the Corporation) for the assets or securities of a third party; or
(2) except in the ordinary course of business, any sale, lease, exchange,
mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition to or with any other person (in
a single transaction or a series of related transactions) of all or a
Substantial Part (as hereinafter defined) of the assets of the Corporation
(including without limitation any securities of a subsidiary); or
(3) except in the ordinary course of business, any sale, lease, exchange,
mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition to or with the Corporation or to
or with any of its subsidiaries (in a single transaction or series of related
transactions) of the assets or securities of any other person if the fair market
value of such assets or securities would constitute a Substantial Part of the
assets of the Corporation; or
(4) any agreement, contract or other arrangement providing for any of the
transactions described in this definition of Business Combination. Anything in
the foregoing to the contrary notwithstanding, the term "Business Combination"
shall not be deemed to include any of the transactions contemplated by that
certain Credit Agreement or that certain Business Loan Agreement, both dated as
of February 27, 1985, between Granite Construction Company and Bank of America
N.T. & S.A., or any renewals, extensions or refundings thereof; or
(5) the adoption of any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution
of the Corporation.
The term "Substantial Part" shall mean more than 20% of the fair market
value of the total consolidated assets of the Corporation and its subsidiaries
taken as a whole, as determined by two-thirds of the members of the Board of
Directors of such person in good faith, as of the end of its most recent fiscal
year ending prior to the time the determination is being made. The terms
"Business Combination" as used in this Article EIGHTH shall mean any transaction
or proposed transaction which is referred to in any one or more of the foregoing
subparagraphs (1) through (5) of this paragraph A of this Article EIGHTH.
If Proposal 2 is approved by the stockholders of the Company, Article
Eighth will be deleted in its entirety, will be replaced by the words
"Intentionally Omitted" and will read as follows: "EIGHTH: Intentionally
Omitted."
A-1
22
APPENDIX B
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED
AUDIT/COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER
ORGANIZATION
This charter governs the operations of the Audit/Compliance Committee. The
Committee shall review and reassess the charter at least annually and obtain the
approval of the Board of Directors for all required changes. The
Audit/Compliance Committee shall be appointed by the Board of Directors and
shall be composed of at least three directors, each of whom is independent of
Management and the Company. Members of the Committee shall be considered
independent if they have no relationship that may interfere with the exercise of
their independence from Management and the Company. All Committee members shall
be financially literate and at least one member shall have accounting or related
financial management expertise. The Committee shall meet on a regular basis at
least three times per year, or as often as circumstances dictate.
STATEMENT OF POLICY
The Audit/Compliance Committee shall provide assistance to the Board of
Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibility to the stockholders,
potential stockholders, the investment community, and others relating to the
Company's financial statements and the financial reporting process, the systems
of internal accounting and financial controls, the internal audit function,
quarterly financial results, the annual independent audit of the Company's
financial statements, and the Corporate Compliance programs as established by
Management and the Board. In so doing, it is the responsibility of the Committee
to maintain free and open communication between the Committee, independent
auditors, the internal auditors and Management of the Company. In discharging
its oversight role, the Committee is empowered to investigate any matter brought
to its attention with full access to all books, records, facilities, and
personnel of the Company and the power to retain outside counsel, or other
experts for this purpose.
RESPONSIBILITIES AND PROCESSES
The primary responsibility of the Audit/Compliance Committee is to oversee the
Company's financial reporting, corporate governance (including compliance with
regulatory matters), and internal operating controls and to report its
observations and activities to the Board. Management is responsible for
preparing the Company's financial statements, and the independent auditors are
responsible for auditing those financial statements. The Committee, in carrying
out its responsibilities, believes its policies and procedures should remain
flexible, in order to best react to changing conditions and circumstances. The
Committee should monitor Management's actions to set the overall corporate
"tone" for quality financial reporting, sound business risk practices, and
compliance with its Code of Conduct.
The following shall be the principal recurring processes of the Audit/Compliance
Committee in carrying out its oversight responsibilities. The processes are set
forth as a guide with the understanding that the Committee may supplement them
as appropriate.
The Committee shall have a clear understanding with Management and the
independent auditors that the independent auditors are accountable to the
Board and the Audit/Compliance Committee, as representatives of the
Company's stockholders. The Committee shall discuss with the auditors their
independence from Management and the Company and the matters included in
the written disclosures required by the Independence Standards Board
(SAS61). Annually, the Committee shall review and recommend to the Board
the selection or replacement of the Company's independent auditors which is
to be submitted by the Board to the stockholders for ratification.
The Committee shall discuss with the internal auditors and the
independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective
audits including the adequacy of staffing and compensation. Also, the
Committee shall discuss with Management, the internal auditors, and the
independent auditors the adequacy and effectiveness of the accounting and
financial controls, including the Company's system to
B-1
23
monitor and manage business risk, and legal and Corporate Compliance
programs. Further, the Committee shall meet separately with the internal
auditors and the independent auditors, with and without Management present,
to discuss the results of their examinations.
The Committee shall review with Management and the independent
auditors the financial statements to be included in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K (or the annual report to stockholders if distributed
prior to the filing of Form 10-K), including their judgment about the
appropriateness of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of
significant judgments, the effectiveness of internal controls, and the
clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. Specifically, the
Committee or at least its Chairman, together with a representative of
financial management, will meet with the independent auditor, in person or
by telephone, prior to any public release of financial results (earnings
press release, 10-Q, 10-K, etc.). The Committee shall discuss the results
of the annual audit, examine any proposed changes in the Company's
accounting policies and protocol and be apprised of any other matters
required to be communicated to the Committee by the independent auditor
under generally accepted auditing standards. The Committee shall also
review all filings with the SEC.
The Committee shall seek reasonable assurance that the Company is in
compliance with applicable laws and regulations and is conducting its
affairs ethically, including compliance with the Corporate Code of Conduct,
and is maintaining effective control against employee conflict of interest
and fraud. In this regard, the Committee should receive regular reports
from the Compliance Officer on progress of activities and future plans and
objectives.
The Committee shall review the Internal Audit Department Charter that
explains the functional and organizational framework for providing services
to Management and the Audit/Compliance Committee, including the purpose,
responsibility, authority and reporting relationship of the Internal Audit
function.
The Audit/Compliance Committee Meeting Planner provides a process
checklist and will be updated annually.
B-2
24
PROXY
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED
UNALLOCATED SHARES VOTING DIRECTIVE CARD FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
The undersigned hereby directs BNY Western Trust Company as Trustee of
the GRANITE CONSTRUCTION Employee Stock Ownership Plan to vote the undersigned
participant's pro rata portion of the unallocated shares of stock of GRANITE
CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED beneficially held by the Plan at the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED (the "Company") to be held at
the Embassy Suites, 1441 Canyon Del Rey, Seaside, California on May 21, 2001, at
10:30 a.m., local time, and at any adjournment thereof (1) as hereinafter
specified upon the proposals listed below and as more particularly described in
the Proxy Statement of the Company dated April __, 2001 (the "Proxy Statement"),
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and (2) in the Trustee's discretion
upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting. The undersigned
hereby acknowledges receipt of the Company's 2000 Annual Report.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT: PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND MAIL PROMPTLY THE ENCLOSED UNALLOCATED SHARES
VOTING DIRECTIVE CARD IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE TO ASSURE THAT YOUR
SHARES ARE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. IF YOU FAIL TO RETURN YOUR VOTING
DIRECTIVE CARD TO THE TRUSTEE BY MAY 17, 2001, YOU WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE
AUTHORIZED THE PLAN'S COMMITTEE TO DIRECT THE TRUSTEE HOW TO VOTE THESE SHARES.
AS A PARTICIPANT IN THE GRANITE CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN (THE
"PLAN"), YOU ARE ENTITLED TO VOTE YOUR PRO RATA PORTION OF THE UNALLOCATED
SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK HELD IN THE PLAN. YOUR VOTING DIRECTION SUBMITTED TO
THE BNY WESTERN TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE OF THE PLAN, WILL BE CONFIDENTIAL.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(continued, and to be signed, on other side)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- FOLD AND DETACH HERE -
25
A VOTE FOR THE FOLLOWING PROPOSALS IS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
Please mark
your votes as
indicated in [X]
this example.
FOR all nominees WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
listed below to vote for
1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (except as marked all nominees
To elect Brian C. Kelly, Rebecca to the contrary) listed below
A. McDonald and George B. Searle [ ] [ ]
as directors to hold office for a
three-year term and until their
respective successors are elected
and have qualified.
(INSTRUCTION: TO WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL NOMINEE,
STRIKE A LINE THROUGH THE NOMINEE'S NAME BELOW.)
NOMINEES: BRIAN C. KELLY, REBECCA A. MCDONALD, GEORGE B. SEARLE
2. To amend the Certificate of Incorporation of the FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
Company to eliminate Article Eighth, which imposes [ ] [ ] [ ]
stockholder super-majority voting requirements for
mergers, substantial asset sales and similar
transactions.
3. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers [ ] [ ] [ ]
LLP as the Company's independent accountants for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2001.
4. With discretionary authority, upon such other matters as may properly come
before the meeting. The persons making this solicitation know at this time of
no other matters to be presented at the meeting.
The shares represented hereby shall be voted as specified. IF NO SPECIFICATION
IS MADE, SUCH SHARES WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR OF PROPOSALS 1, 2 AND 3.
IMPORTANT: PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND MAIL PROMPTLY THE ENCLOSED PROXY IN
THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE TO ASSURE THAT YOUR SHARES ARE
REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. If you attend the meeting, you may vote
in person should you wish to do so even though you have already sent
in your Proxy.
Signature(s)*_____________________________________ Dated:_________________, 2001
(Please sign your name exactly as it appears on the stock certificate
representing your shares.)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- FOLD AND DETACH HERE -
26
PROXY
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED
ALLOCATED SHARES VOTING DIRECTIVE CARD FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
The undersigned hereby directs BNY Western Trust Company as Trustee of
the GRANITE CONSTRUCTION Employee Stock Ownership Plan to vote all of the
allocated shares of stock of GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED beneficially held
for the undersigned by the Plan at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of GRANITE
CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED (the "Company") to be held at the Embassy Suites, 1441
Canyon Del Rey, Seaside, California on May 21, 2001, at 10:30 a.m., local time,
and at any adjournment thereof (1) as hereinafter specified upon the proposals
listed below and as more particularly described in the Proxy Statement of the
Company dated April __, 2001 (the "Proxy Statement"), receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, and (2) in the Trustee's discretion upon such other matters as may
properly come before the meeting. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of
the Company's 2000 Annual Report.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT: PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND MAIL PROMPTLY THE ENCLOSED ALLOCATED SHARES
VOTING DIRECTIVE CARD IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE TO ASSURE THAT YOUR SHARES
ARE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. IF YOU FAIL TO RETURN YOUR VOTING DIRECTIVE CARD
TO THE TRUSTEE BY MAY 17, 2001, YOU WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE AUTHORIZED THE PLAN'S
COMMITTEE TO DIRECT THE TRUSTEE HOW TO VOTE THESE SHARES. AS A PARTICIPANT IN
THE GRANITE CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN (THE "PLAN"), YOU ARE
ENTITLED TO VOTE YOUR ALLOCATED PORTION OF THE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK HELD
IN THE PLAN. YOUR VOTING DIRECTION SUBMITTED TO THE BNY WESTERN TRUST COMPANY,
TRUSTEE OF THE PLAN, WILL BE CONFIDENTIAL.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(continued, and to be signed, on other side)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- FOLD AND DETACH HERE -
27
A VOTE FOR THE FOLLOWING PROPOSALS IS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
Please mark
your votes as
indicated in [X]
this example.
FOR all nominees WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
listed below to vote for
1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (except as marked all nominees
To elect Brian C. Kelly, Rebecca to the contrary) listed below
A. McDonald and George B. Searle [ ] [ ]
as directors to hold office for a
three-year term and until their
respective successors are elected
and have qualified.
(INSTRUCTION: TO WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL NOMINEE,
STRIKE A LINE THROUGH THE NOMINEE'S NAME BELOW.)
NOMINEES: BRIAN C. KELLY, REBECCA A. MCDONALD, GEORGE B. SEARLE
2. To amend the Certificate of Incorporation of the FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
Company to eliminate Article Eighth, which imposes [ ] [ ] [ ]
stockholder super-majority voting requirements for
mergers, substantial asset sales and similar
transactions.
3. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers [ ] [ ] [ ]
LLP as the Company's independent accountants for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2001.
4. With discretionary authority, upon such other matters as may properly come
before the meeting. The persons making this solicitation know at this time of
no other matters to be presented at the meeting.
The shares represented hereby shall be voted as specified. IF NO SPECIFICATION
IS MADE, SUCH SHARES WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR OF PROPOSALS 1, 2 AND 3.
IMPORTANT: PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND MAIL PROMPTLY THE ENCLOSED PROXY IN
THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE TO ASSURE THAT YOUR SHARES ARE
REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. If you attend the meeting, you may vote
in person should you wish to do so even though you have already sent
in your Proxy.
Signature(s)*_____________________________________ Dated:_________________, 2001
(Please sign your name exactly as it appears on the stock certificate
representing your shares.)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- FOLD AND DETACH HERE -
28
PROXY
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED
PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints David H. Watts and William E. Barton and each of
them with full power of substitution to represent the undersigned and to vote
all the shares of stock in GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED (the "Company")
which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
of the Company to be held at the Embassy Suites, 1441 Canyon Del Rey, Seaside,
California on May 21, 2001, at 10:30 a.m., local time, and at any adjournment
thereof (1) as hereinafter specified upon the proposals listed below and as more
particularly described in the Proxy Statement of the Company dated April ___,
2001 (the "Proxy Statement"), receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and (2)
in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before the
meeting. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Company's 2000
Annual Report.
(CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE.)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- FOLD AND DETACH HERE -
29
A VOTE FOR THE FOLLOWING PROPOSALS IS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
Please mark
your votes as
indicated in [X]
this example.
FOR all nominees WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
listed below to vote for
1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (except as marked all nominees
To elect Brian C. Kelly, Rebecca to the contrary) listed below
A. McDonald and George B. Searle [ ] [ ]
as directors to hold office for a
three-year term and until their
respective successors are elected
and have qualified.
(INSTRUCTION: TO WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL NOMINEE,
STRIKE A LINE THROUGH THE NOMINEE'S NAME BELOW.)
NOMINEES: BRIAN C. KELLY, REBECCA A. MCDONALD, GEORGE B. SEARLE
2. To amend the Certificate of Incorporation of the FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
Company to eliminate Article Eighth, which imposes [ ] [ ] [ ]
stockholder super-majority voting requirements for
mergers, substantial asset sales and similar
transactions.
3. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers [ ] [ ] [ ]
LLP as the Company's independent accountants for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2001.
4. With discretionary authority, upon such other matters as may properly come
before the meeting. The persons making this solicitation know at this time of
no other matters to be presented at the meeting.
The shares represented hereby shall be voted as specified. IF NO SPECIFICATION
IS MADE, SUCH SHARES WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR OF PROPOSALS 1, 2 AND 3.
IMPORTANT: PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND MAIL PROMPTLY THE ENCLOSED PROXY IN
THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE TO ASSURE THAT YOUR SHARES ARE
REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. If you attend the meeting, you may vote
in person should you wish to do so even though you have already sent
in your Proxy.
Signature(s)*_____________________________________ Dated:_________________, 2001
(Please sign your name exactly as it appears on the stock certificate
representing your shares.)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- FOLD AND DETACH HERE -