1
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to 240.14a-11(c) or 240.14a-12
BANK PLUS CORPORATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[ ] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
[X] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
2
BANK PLUS CORPORATION
4565 COLORADO BOULEVARD
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90039
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 12, 2001
To the Stockholders of Bank Plus Corporation:
The annual meeting of the stockholders of Bank Plus Corporation ("Bank
Plus") will be held at our corporate offices located at 4565 Colorado Boulevard,
Los Angeles, California, on September 12, 2001 at 10:00 a.m. local time for the
purpose of considering and taking appropriate action with respect to the
following:
1. A proposal to adopt and approve an Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated as of June 2, 2001 by and among Bank Plus Corporation, FBOP
Corporation and FBOP Acquisition Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of
FBOP, which provides for FBOP Corporation to acquire Bank Plus Corporation
through a merger of FBOP Acquisition Sub, Inc. into Bank Plus; as a result
of the merger, each outstanding share of Bank Plus common stock would be
converted into the right to receive at least $7.25 in cash.
2. The election of three directors to the Bank Plus board of
directors; and
3. Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any
adjournments thereof.
Only holders of record of shares of common stock at the close of business
on August 7, 2001 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual
meeting. A list of such stockholders will be open for examination by any
stockholder at the meeting and for a period of ten days prior to the date of the
meeting during ordinary business hours at our corporate offices.
THE BANK PLUS BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR"
ADOPTION AND APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT OF MERGER AND "FOR" THE ELECTION OF ALL
NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR.
Whether or not you expect to attend the annual meeting in person, please
complete, sign and return the accompanying proxy card without delay in the
enclosed postage prepaid envelope. This will not limit your right to revoke your
proxy and vote in person at the annual meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ GODFREY B. EVANS
Godfrey B. Evans
Corporate Secretary
Los Angeles, California
August 9, 2001
3
BANK PLUS CORPORATION
4565 COLORADO BOULEVARD
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90039
MERGER PROPOSED -- YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
Dear Bank Plus Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2001 annual meeting of stockholders
of Bank Plus Corporation ("Bank Plus"). The meeting will be held on Wednesday,
September 12, 2001 at 10:00 a.m. local time at Bank Plus' corporate offices at
4565 Colorado Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90039.
At the meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon a merger
agreement among Bank Plus, FBOP Corporation and FBOP Acquisition Sub, Inc.,
under which FBOP Corporation will acquire Bank Plus. If the merger is completed,
you will receive a minimum of $7.25 in cash for each share of Bank Plus common
stock you own. This represents a 41.4% premium over the average closing price
for the four-week period immediately preceding the date on which Bank Plus first
publicly announced the execution of the merger agreement.
You will also be asked to elect three persons to the board of directors of
Bank Plus who will serve until the merger is completed or until their successors
are duly elected.
After careful consideration, the Bank Plus board of directors has
unanimously approved the agreement of merger and has determined that the merger
is fair to, and in the best interests of, Bank Plus stockholders. The Bank Plus
board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote "FOR" the adoption and
approval of the agreement of merger and that you vote "FOR" the election of all
nominees for director.
Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of shares you own.
Completion of the agreement of merger is subject to certain conditions,
including regulatory approvals and the approval of the merger by the affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Bank Plus.
Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please complete and sign the
enclosed proxy card and promptly return it in the enclosed postage prepaid
envelope.
The accompanying proxy statement and notice contain important information.
We encourage you to read these materials carefully before voting.
Enclosed with this proxy statement is a copy of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and a copy of our most recent
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of 2001, both as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. If you have any questions, please do not
hesitate to contact Neil L. Osborne, our Investor Relations Officer, at the
address above or at (818) 549-3116.
I look forward to seeing you on Wednesday, September 12, 2001.
Sincerely,
/s/ GORDON V. SMITH
Gordon V. Smith
Chairman of the Board
The proxy statement and form of proxy are dated August 9, 2001 and are
first being mailed to Bank Plus Corporation's stockholders on or about August 9,
2001.
4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<Table>
<Caption>
PAGE
----
SUMMARY TERM SHEET.......................................... 1
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER AND THE ANNUAL
MEETING................................................... 6
THE COMPANIES............................................... 10
Bank Plus Corporation..................................... 10
FBOP Corporation.......................................... 10
Acquisition Sub........................................... 10
THE MEETING................................................. 10
General................................................... 10
Record Date and Quorum Requirement........................ 11
Required Vote............................................. 11
Adjournment............................................... 11
Voting Agreements......................................... 12
Solicitation, Proxy Solicitor, Revocation and Use of
Proxies................................................ 12
Proposals of Stockholders................................. 12
Surrender of Common Stock Certificates.................... 13
THE PROPOSED MERGER......................................... 14
The Merger................................................ 14
What You Will Receive in the Merger....................... 14
Background of the Merger.................................. 14
Reasons for the Merger and Recommendation of Our Board of
Directors.............................................. 20
Opinion of Our Financial Advisor.......................... 22
Regulatory Approvals...................................... 28
Capital Required for the Merger........................... 28
Termination of Registration............................... 28
Appraisal Rights.......................................... 29
Federal Income Tax Consequences........................... 31
THE MERGER AGREEMENT........................................ 33
Terms of the Merger....................................... 33
When the Merger Will Be Completed......................... 33
Conditions to the Merger.................................. 33
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger.................... 34
Representations and Warranties............................ 36
Covenants of Bank Plus and FBOP in the Merger Agreement... 36
Termination of the Merger Agreement....................... 38
Expenses and Termination Fee.............................. 38
Changing the Terms of the Merger Agreement................ 39
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER.................. 40
Indemnification........................................... 40
Interests of Our Officers and Directors in the Merger..... 40
Fees Payable to Our Financial Advisor..................... 41
</Table>
i
5
<Table>
<Caption>
PAGE
----
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS....................................... 42
Directors................................................. 42
Agreements with Certain Stockholder Groups................ 42
Nominees for Director at the 2001 Annual Meeting.......... 43
Continuing Directors...................................... 44
Executive Officers........................................ 45
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings.................. 46
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION...................................... 47
Summary Compensation Table................................ 47
Stock Option Grants in 2000............................... 48
Unexercised Stock Options................................. 48
Ten-Year Option Repricing................................. 49
Retirement Income (Defined Benefit) Plan.................. 49
Employment Contracts with Executive Officers; Termination
of Employment and
Change in Control Agreements........................... 50
Director Compensation..................................... 52
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE...................................... 53
Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation... 53
Stock Performance Graph................................... 56
VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS THEREOF............. 57
Security Ownership of Management.......................... 57
Security Ownership by Others.............................. 58
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS........................................ 59
AUDIT COMMITTEE............................................. 59
Report of the Audit Committee............................. 59
OTHER MATTERS............................................... 60
Board of Directors and Committees......................... 60
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934............................................ 61
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS................................................ 61
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION......................... 62
ANNEX A: AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
ANNEX B: FINANCIAL ADVISOR'S FAIRNESS OPINION
ANNEX C: SECTION 262 OF THE DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
ANNEX D: AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
</Table>
ii
6
SUMMARY TERM SHEET
The following is a summary of the terms of the proposed acquisition of Bank
Plus Corporation by FBOP Corporation, and other information relating to the
annual meeting.
This summary may not contain all of the information that is important to
you. We urge you to read this entire proxy statement carefully, as well as the
additional documents to which it refers. A copy of the Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of June 2, 2001, among Bank Plus Corporation, FBOP Corporation
and FBOP Acquisition Sub, Inc. is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement
and is referred to in this proxy statement as the "merger agreement." For
instructions on obtaining more information, see the section entitled "Where You
Can Find More Information" beginning on page 62.
Throughout this proxy statement "Bank Plus," "we" and "our" refers to Bank
Plus Corporation, "Fidelity" refers to our subsidiary, Fidelity Federal Bank,
"Gateway" refers to our subsidiary, Gateway Investment Services, Inc. and "FBOP"
refers to FBOP Corporation.
THE COMPANIES
Bank Plus (see
page 10) Bank Plus Corporation is a $2.2 billion thrift holding
company, incorporated under Delaware law. Bank Plus owns
Fidelity Federal Bank, FSB, which presently operates through
29 full-service branches located in the Southern California
counties of Los Angeles and Orange.
Our principal executive offices are located at 4565 Colorado
Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90039 and our telephone
number is (818) 549-3116.
FBOP (see page 10) FBOP Corporation is an $8 billion Illinois corporation and a
registered bank and savings institution holding company
subject to supervision by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System. FBOP is based in Oak Park, Illinois
and conducts its operations through subsidiary financial
institutions in Illinois, Texas and California.
Acquisition Sub (see
page 10) FBOP Acquisition Sub, Inc. (to which we refer in this proxy
statement as "Acquisition Sub") is a Delaware corporation
and wholly-owned subsidiary of FBOP that was formed for the
purpose of effecting the merger. Acquisition Sub has no
other operations.
THE MEETING AND REQUIRED VOTE
Date, Place and Time
of the Annual
Meeting (see
page 10) Our annual meeting will be held at 4565 Colorado Boulevard,
Los Angeles, California 90039 on September 12, 2001 at 10:00
a.m. local time. At the meeting, you will be asked to
approve the merger agreement and elect three directors to
our board.
Record Date, Voting
At the Annual
Meeting (see
page 11) We have set the record date for our annual meeting as August
7, 2001. You can vote at the meeting of stockholders if you
were a Bank Plus common stockholder of record at the close
of business on the record date. You will be able to cast one
vote for each share of Bank Plus common stock you owned at
that time. As of August 7, 2001, there were 19,476,696
shares of common stock outstanding.
Vote Required to
Elect Directors (see
page 11) Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes of the
shares of Bank Plus common stock represented in person or by
proxy and entitled to vote at the annual meeting. You can
vote your shares by attending the meeting and voting in
person or by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card.
If you return a properly
1
7
executed proxy, unless you indicate to the contrary, you
will be deemed to be voting for Mr. Norman Barker, Jr., Mr.
Gordon V. Smith and Mr. Mark K. Mason.
Vote Required to
Approve the Merger
Agreement (see
page 11) Approval of the merger agreement requires the vote of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Bank Plus
common stock. A failure to vote, either by not returning the
enclosed proxy or by checking the 'abstain' box, will have
the same effect as a vote against the merger agreement. If
you return a properly executed proxy, unless you indicate to
the contrary, you will be deemed to be voting for the
adoption and approval of the merger agreement.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Election of Our Board
of Directors (see
page 43) Our board of directors has nominated and is unanimously
recommending that you elect Mr. Norman Barker, Jr., Mr.
Gordon V. Smith and Mr. Mark K. Mason to our board of
directors.
THE PROPOSED MERGER
The Merger (see
page 14) FBOP will acquire Bank Plus through a merger of FBOP's
wholly-owned subsidiary, Acquisition Sub, with and into Bank
Plus. Following the merger, we will be a wholly-owned
subsidiary of FBOP. In addition, we will cease to file
reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and our
common stock will cease to be traded on the Nasdaq National
Market.
What You Will
Receive in the Merger
(see page 14) As a Bank Plus common stockholder at the effective time of
the merger, each of your shares of common stock will
automatically be converted into the right to receive $7.25
in cash, subject to increase if the term of the merger
agreement is extended beyond December 31, 2001.
Each option to purchase Bank Plus common stock outstanding
immediately prior to the effective time will be canceled.
Certain optionholders will receive payment for their
options.
Our Board of
Directors
Recommends That
You Vote for the
Approval of the
Merger Agreement
(see page 20) Our board of directors believes that the merger is fair to,
and in the best interests of, our stockholders and
unanimously recommends that you vote "FOR" the approval of
the merger agreement. The board of directors considered a
number of factors in reaching its determination, including
the fact that the minimum merger consideration of $7.25 per
share represents a 41.4% premium over the average closing
price of our common stock for the four-week period
immediately preceding the date on which we first publicly
announced the merger, and a 36.8% premium over the closing
price on the day before the merger was announced.
Opinion of Our
Financial Advisor
(see
page 22) Our financial advisor, Sandler O'Neill and Partners, L.P.
(to whom we refer to in this proxy statement as "Sandler
O'Neill"), has provided an opinion to our board of directors
that the minimum cash price of $7.25 per share provided in
the merger agreement is fair, from a financial point of
view, to the holders of our common stock. The full text of
Sandler O'Neill's written opinion, which sets forth the
assumptions made, the matters considered, the scope and
limitations of the review undertaken and the procedures
followed by Sandler O'Neill in rendering its opinion, is
attached to this proxy statement as Annex B. Sandler
O'Neill's opinion was provided for the information and
assistance of our board of directors and is not a
recommendation as to how Bank Plus stockholders should vote
at the annual meeting.
We urge you to read Sandler O'Neill's opinion carefully and
in its entirety.
2
8
Sandler O'Neill will receive a fee customary for this type
of transaction if the merger is consummated. See "Interests
of Certain Persons in the Merger -- Fees Payable to Our
Financial Advisor" beginning on page 41.
Interests of
Directors
and Officers in the
Merger that Differ
from Your Interests
(see page 40)
Some of our directors and officers have interests in the
merger that are different from, or are in addition to, their
interests as stockholders of Bank Plus, including certain
payments due upon a "change of control." Our board of
directors knew about these additional interests, and
considered them, when they approved the merger agreement.
Regulatory Approvals
Needed (see page 28)
We cannot complete the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement unless they are approved by the appropriate
regulatory agencies, including the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System. In addition, Gateway is required to
file an application with the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. for approval of change of ownership
in connection with the merger. All of the required
applications or waiver requests will be filed with these
regulatory authorities by the appropriate parties.
Dissenters' Appraisal
Rights (see page 29)
As a Bank Plus stockholder, you have dissenters' rights of
appraisal under Delaware law. This means that if you are not
satisfied with the amount you would receive in the merger,
you are legally entitled to have the value of your Bank Plus
shares independently determined and if the merger is
consummated, to receive payment based on that valuation,
which may be more or less than $7.25 per share. If you want
to exercise your dissenters' rights, you must carefully
follow the procedures described under the caption the
"Proposed Merger -- Appraisal Rights" beginning on page 29
of this proxy statement and in Annex C.
Federal Income Tax
Consequences (see
page 31)
The receipt of cash in exchange for your Bank Plus common
stock will be a taxable transaction to you. We urge you to
consult your own tax advisors to determine the effect of the
merger on you under federal law, and under your own state
and local tax laws.
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
Conditions to the
Merger (see page 33)
The merger will be completed only if a number of conditions
are satisfied or waived by Bank Plus, Acquisition Sub and
FBOP, as applicable. These conditions include, among other
things:
- the approval of the merger agreement by holders of a
majority of our outstanding shares of common stock;
- the material accuracy of the parties' representations
and warranties contained in the merger agreement and
the performance of all obligations that are required
to be performed by them, except where such inaccuracy
or non-performance would not have a material adverse
effect on the party making the representation or
warranty or promise to perform;
- the receipt of all necessary third party,
governmental and regulatory approvals; and
- the absence of any event since the signing of the
merger agreement that has had a material adverse
effect on Bank Plus or the transaction.
If all of these conditions are not met or waived, the merger
will not be completed, even if our stockholders vote in
favor of the merger agreement.
3
9
No Solicitation of
Transactions; Rights
to Enter Into a
Superior Proposal
(see page 36) The merger agreement provides that, subject to specified
exceptions, we will not solicit any offers to acquire Bank
Plus or Fidelity.
To the extent our board determines in good faith that it is
necessary to comply with its fiduciary duties, we may
participate in discussions and negotiations with, and
provide information to, a third party that has made an
unsolicited acquisition proposal. If any of these activities
results in an acquisition proposal that our board of
directors concludes is superior to the merger with FBOP, we
may accept the superior proposal, after giving FBOP 48 hours
notice of our intent to do so. In such event, we will have
to pay FBOP a $5 million termination fee, and the merger
agreement, with limited exceptions, will be terminated and
be of no further force or effect.
Termination (see
page 38) The merger agreement can be terminated at any time prior to
the completion of the merger:
- by mutual consent of the boards of directors of Bank
Plus and FBOP;
- by either Bank Plus or FBOP, in the event that the
merger agreement fails to receive the requisite
stockholder approval;
- subject to the right to cure, by either Bank Plus or
FBOP, if the other party has materially breached its
representations, warranties or covenants and if such
breach results in a material adverse effect to the
party making such representation, warranty or
covenant;
- by Bank Plus if our board of directors determines to
accept a superior offer from a third party and pays
the termination fee to FBOP; or
- by either Bank Plus or FBOP if the merger has not
been completed by December 31, 2001, subject to
certain extension provisions that may extend the
termination date to June 30, 2002.
Termination Fee
Payable to FBOP
(see page 38) We must pay FBOP a termination fee of $5 million if the
merger agreement is terminated for any of the following
reasons:
- if we terminate the merger agreement concurrently
with our acceptance of a superior acquisition
proposal; or
- if all of the following occur:
- after the date of the merger agreement and prior to
the meeting of our stockholders to vote on the
merger, there is a public announcement of a
superior proposal;
- Bank Plus or FBOP terminates the merger agreement
due to the failure to obtain the required vote of
our stockholders, and FBOP is not in breach of the
merger agreement; and
- within 9 months of the termination of the merger
agreement, we enter into a definitive agreement
with respect to such superior proposal.
Termination Fee
Payable to Bank Plus
(see page 38) FBOP has placed $5 million into an escrow account pending
completion of the merger. This initial deposit is subject to
increase if FBOP exercises its option to extend the term of
the merger agreement beyond March 31, 2002. This escrow,
together with any interest earned, will be forfeited to us
if the merger agreement is ultimately terminated due to
FBOP's failure to obtain requisite regulatory approval for
the merger, as more particularly described in the merger
agreement.
4
10
Reimbursement of
Expenses upon
Termination (see
page 38) If the merger agreement is terminated under other specified
circumstances described more fully in the merger agreement,
the terminating party must pay the other party's expenses
related to the merger, not to exceed $1,500,000.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Our Common Stock
Information Bank Plus is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the
symbol "BPLS." On June 1, 2001, the trading day immediately
preceding our announcement that we had signed the merger
agreement, the closing price of Bank Plus common stock was
$5.30 per share. During the period from January 1, 2001
through June 1, 2001, the high and low sale prices for
shares of Bank Plus common stock were $3.50 and $5.875,
respectively. The closing price of Bank Plus common stock on
August 6, 2001, which was the last trading day for which a
closing sales price was available before this proxy
statement was reproduced and mailed, was $7.03 per share.
Who Can Help
Answer Other
Questions If you have more questions about the merger or the merger
agreement or would like additional copies of this proxy
statement, our Annual Report on Form 10-K or our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, you should contact Neil Osborne,
Investor Relations at Bank Plus Corporation, 4565 Colorado
Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90039, (818) 549-3116, or
our proxy solicitors, D.F. King & Co. Inc., 77 Water Street,
20th Floor, New York, New York, 10005, (212) 493-6920
Attention: Tom Long.
5
11
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER AND THE ANNUAL MEETING
The following questions and answers are for your convenience only, and
briefly address some commonly asked questions about the proposed merger and the
annual meeting. You should still carefully read this entire proxy statement,
including each of the attached annexes.
Q: WHAT AM I BEING ASKED TO VOTE ON?
A: You are being asked to approve a merger agreement pursuant to which FBOP
will acquire Bank Plus and also to elect three directors to our board of
directors.
Q: WHAT WILL I RECEIVE FOR MY SHARES OF BANK PLUS COMMON STOCK IF THE MERGER IS
COMPLETED?
A: You will receive a minimum of $7.25 in cash for each share of Bank Plus
common stock that you own at the time of the merger, subject to increase
under certain circumstances. See the discussion under the caption "The
Proposed Merger -- What You Will Receive in the Merger" beginning on page 14
for more information.
Q: CAN THE AMOUNT OF CASH THAT BANK PLUS STOCKHOLDERS RECEIVE IN THE MERGER
CHANGE?
A: Yes. If the merger is not consummated by December 31, 2001, the merger
agreement will terminate unless extended as set forth below. The term of the
merger agreement will be automatically extended to March 31, 2002 under
certain circumstances. Furthermore, FBOP may, under certain circumstances,
elect to extend this termination date to no later than June 30, 2002. If the
termination date is extended beyond December 31, 2001, FBOP must pay
interest on the $7.25 per share merger consideration from January 1, 2002.
See the discussion under the caption "The Proposed Merger -- What You Will
Receive in the Merger" beginning on page 14 for more information.
Q: WHY IS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDING THAT I VOTE TO APPROVE THE
MERGER?
A: Our board of directors has unanimously determined that the terms of the
merger agreement and the proposed merger are fair to and in the best
interests of Bank Plus and our stockholders, and therefore unanimously
recommends that you vote "FOR" approval and adoption of the merger
agreement. See the discussion under the caption "The Proposed
Merger -- Reasons for the Merger and Recommendation of Our Board of
Directors" beginning on page 20 for more information.
Q: IS THE MERGER SUBJECT TO ANY CONDITIONS?
A: Yes. Before the merger can be completed, several conditions must be
satisfied or waived, including obtaining the approval by the stockholders of
Bank Plus and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. See the
discussion under the caption "The Proposed Merger -- Regulatory Approvals"
on page 28 for more information. You should also see the caption entitled
"The Merger Agreement -- Conditions to the Merger" beginning on page 33 for
more information on all of the conditions to closing.
Q: WHAT ARE THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER TO BANK PLUS' STOCKHOLDERS?
A: For United States federal income tax purposes, your exchange of shares of
common stock for cash generally will cause you to recognize a gain or loss
measured by the difference between the cash you receive in the merger and
your adjusted tax basis in your shares of common stock.
TAX MATTERS ARE VERY COMPLICATED AND THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER TO
YOU WILL DEPEND ON THE FACTS OF YOUR PARTICULAR SITUATION. YOU SHOULD
CONSULT YOUR TAX AND OTHER ADVISORS.
See the discussion under the caption "The Proposal Merger -- Federal Income
Tax Consequences" beginning on page 31 for more information.
6
12
Q: WHAT CAN I DO IF I AM NOT SATISFIED WITH THE PAYMENT I WILL RECEIVE FOR MY
SHARES?
A: Under Delaware law, if you are not satisfied with the amount you are
receiving in the merger, you are legally entitled to have the value of your
shares judicially determined. Any consideration that you receive for your
shares of common stock pursuant to such judicial valuation could be more or
less than you would have received pursuant to the merger. To exercise your
dissenters' appraisal rights, you must follow certain procedures under
Delaware law. If you do not follow these procedures exactly, you will lose
your dissenters' appraisal rights. See the discussion under the caption "The
Proposal Merger -- Appraisal Rights" beginning on page 29 for a summary of
such provisions and Annex C to this proxy statement for the complete text of
the Delaware appraisal statute.
Q: HOW WILL MANAGEMENT BENEFIT FROM THE MERGER?
A: In addition to the benefits they will receive as stockholders, officers of
Bank Plus or Fidelity who have stock options, rights under bonus plans or
change in control agreements may receive additional compensation as the
result of the merger, some of which would be based upon the merger price per
share. Outside directors of Bank Plus or Fidelity will receive deferred
compensation as the result of the merger. See the discussion under the
caption "Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger -- Interests of Our
Officers and Directors in the Merger" beginning on page 40 for more
information.
Q: WHY IS BANK PLUS ELECTING DIRECTORS AT THIS TIME?
A: In light of the ongoing merger negotiations, we postponed our 2001 annual
meeting of stockholders to avoid the expense of two proxy solicitations. In
accordance with our bylaws, three of our board members are due to stand for
re-election at this time. If the merger is not completed, the newly elected
directors will serve for three-year terms or until their replacements are
elected. If the merger is completed, FBOP will replace our board with its
own appointees.
Q: WHAT VOTE IS NEEDED TO ELECT DIRECTORS?
A: Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares of
common stock represented in person or by proxy at the annual meeting.
Consequently, the three nominees receiving the highest number of votes at
the annual meeting will be elected directors.
Q: WHAT DO I NEED TO DO NOW?
A: Carefully consider the enclosed information, then indicate how you want to
vote and sign and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope as soon as
possible. Your shares will then be voted at the annual meeting in accordance
with your instructions.
Q: WHAT VOTE IS REQUIRED TO APPROVE THE MERGER AGREEMENT?
A: The merger agreement must be approved by the holders of a majority of
outstanding shares of our common stock.
Q: HOW DO I VOTE MY SHARES?
A: YOU MAY AUTHORIZE THE PROXY HOLDERS TO VOTE FOR YOU. After you have
carefully reviewed this entire proxy statement, including the attached
annexes, please mark your vote on the enclosed proxy card, sign it and mail
it to us in the enclosed postage prepaid envelope as soon as possible. Doing
so will ensure that your shares will be voted at the annual meeting. If you
mark your voting instructions on the proxy card, then your shares will be
voted by the proxy holders as you instruct. If you sign and return the proxy
card and do not indicate how you want to vote, your shares will be voted FOR
the approval of the merger agreement and the election of directors.
YOU MAY VOTE IN PERSON. During the annual meeting, we will pass out written
ballots to anyone who is entitled to vote and wants to vote. However, if
your shares are not held in your name, you must request a
7
13
proxy from the registered holder. Typically, shares purchased through a
stockbroker are held in the name of an entity designated by the brokerage
firm, which is referred to as a "street name" holder. Any shares held in
"street name" cannot be voted without a proxy obtained from your broker.
Q: IF MY SHARES ARE HELD IN "STREET NAME" BY MY BROKER, WILL MY BROKER
AUTOMATICALLY VOTE MY SHARES OF COMMON STOCK FOR ME?
A: Your broker will vote your shares held in "street name" only if you provide
written instructions as to how you want your shares voted. You should follow
the directions provided by your broker regarding how to instruct your broker
to vote your shares. Without instructions, your shares held in "street name"
will not be voted by your broker, and the failure to vote your shares will
have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the approval of the merger agreement.
Q: WILL MY SHARES BE VOTED IF I DO NOT SIGN AND RETURN MY PROXY CARD?
A: If you do not sign and return the enclosed proxy card and you do not
otherwise sign a proxy from your broker (for any shares held in "street
name") or vote your shares in person at the annual meeting, your shares will
not be voted. If your shares are not voted, it will have the same effect as
a vote AGAINST the merger agreement.
Q: HOW CAN I CHANGE MY VOTE AFTER I INSTRUCT MY BROKER TO VOTE MY SHARES HELD
IN "STREET NAME"?
A: If you hold your shares in "street name" and have instructed your broker to
vote your shares, you must follow the directions from your broker to change
your vote.
Q: HOW CAN I CHANGE MY VOTE AFTER I HAVE MAILED MY PROXY CARD IF MY SHARES ARE
NOT HELD IN "STREET NAME"?
A: If you have not voted through your broker, there are three ways you can
change your vote after you have sent in your proxy card:
- First, you may send a written notice to our corporate secretary c/o
Bank Plus Corporation 4565 Colorado Boulevard, Los Angeles, California
90039 before your stock has been voted at the annual meeting, stating
that you are revoking your proxy.
- Second, you may complete a new proxy card and provide it to our
corporate secretary at the above address before your stock has been
voted at the annual meeting. Any earlier proxy will be revoked
automatically.
- Third, you may attend the meeting and vote in person. Any earlier
proxy will be revoked. However, simply attending the meeting without
voting will not revoke your proxy.
Q: SHOULD I SEND IN MY COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATES NOW?
A: No. Instructions for submitting common stock certificates will be sent to
you after the merger has been completed.
Q: WHEN DOES BANK PLUS EXPECT THE MERGER TO BE COMPLETED?
A: We anticipate completing the merger in the fourth quarter of 2001. The
merger cannot occur unless the merger agreement is approved and adopted by
the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock, all
regulatory approvals are received and the other conditions are satisfied or
waived. See the discussion under the caption "The Merger
Agreement -- Conditions to the Merger" beginning on page 33 for more
information.
8
14
Q: HAS THE COMPANY HIRED ANYONE TO SOLICIT PROXIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE
ANNUAL MEETING?
A: Bank Plus has hired D.F. King & Co., Inc. to solicit proxies in connection
with the annual meeting. The terms of Bank Plus' arrangement with D.F. King
& Co., Inc. are described in the section entitled "The
Meeting -- Solicitation; Proxy Solicitor, Revocation and Use of Proxies"
beginning on page 12.
Q: WHO CAN HELP ANSWER MY QUESTIONS?
A: If you have more questions about the merger, you should contact:
Bank Plus Corporation
4565 Colorado Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90039
Attention: Neil L. Osborne, Investor Relations Officer
Telephone: (818) 549-3116
You can also contact our proxy solicitor at:
D.F. King & Co. Inc.
77 Water Street, 20th Floor
New York, New York, 10005
Attention: Tom Long
Telephone: (212) 493-6920
9
15
THE COMPANIES
BANK PLUS CORPORATION
Bank Plus Corporation, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Fidelity
Federal Bank and Gateway, a National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
registered broker/dealer, offers a broad range of consumer financial services,
such as demand and term deposits, loans and uninsured investment products,
including mutual funds and annuities. Fidelity operates through 29 full-service
branches located in the Southern California counties of Los Angeles and Orange.
At June 30, 2001, the retail branches held total deposits of $2.0 billion, the
mortgage loan portfolio totaled $1.5 billion and the investment portfolio
totaled $0.4 billion. The principal executive offices of Bank Plus and Fidelity
are located at 4565 Colorado Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90039, telephone
number (818) 549-3116.
FBOP CORPORATION
FBOP Corporation is an Illinois corporation and a registered bank and
savings institution holding company subject to supervision by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System. FBOP is based in Oak Park, Illinois and
conducts its operations through its ten subsidiary financial institutions,
California National Bank, Citizens National Bank of Teague Texas, Cosmopolitan
Bank and Trust, First Bank of Oak Park, Madisonville State Bank, North Houston
Bank, Regency Savings Bank, San Diego National Bank, Pullman Bank and Trust and
People's Bank of California. FBOP currently conducts business through a total of
74 offices in Illinois, Texas and California. As of June 30, 2001, FBOP had
total assets of $8.2 billion, total deposits of $6.3 billion and total
stockholders' equity in excess of $438 million. FBOP's executive offices are
located at 11 West Madison Street, Oak Park, Illinois 60302, and its telephone
number is (708) 386-5000.
ACQUISITION SUB
Acquisition Sub is a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of
FBOP which was formed for the purpose of effecting the merger. It is anticipated
that Acquisition Sub will not conduct any business other than in connection with
its formation and capitalization and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement.
THE MEETING
GENERAL
This proxy statement is being furnished to Bank Plus stockholders in
connection with the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors for use at
the annual meeting of stockholders to be held at 4565 Colorado Boulevard, Los
Angeles, California 90039 on September 12, 2001 at 10:00 a.m. local time, and
any adjournments and postponements of the annual meeting. At the annual meeting,
holders of Bank Plus common stock of record as of the close of business on the
record date will be eligible to vote upon the following:
1. A proposal to adopt and approve an Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated as of June 2, 2001 by and among Bank Plus Corporation, FBOP
Corporation and FBOP Acquisition Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of
FBOP, which provides for FBOP Corporation to acquire Bank Plus Corporation
through a merger of Acquisition Sub into Bank Plus; as a result of the
merger, each outstanding share of Bank Plus common stock would be converted
into the right to receive at least $7.25 in cash. A copy of the merger
agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement. The merger
agreement is also described in this proxy statement.
2. The election of three directors to the board of directors of Bank
Plus to serve three-year terms and until their replacements are elected,
unless the merger is completed, in which event, their terms will expire
upon consummation of the merger.
3. Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any
adjournments thereof.
10
16
Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote "FOR" the
adoption and approval of the merger agreement and "FOR" the election of our
board's nominees for director.
A proxy card for the meeting is enclosed with this notice. You are
requested to fill in and sign the proxy card, which is solicited by our board of
directors, and mail it promptly in the enclosed postage prepaid envelope. Return
of an executed proxy card with no instructions indicated on this proxy card will
result in the shares represented by the proxy being voted "FOR" approval of the
merger agreement and "FOR" the election of all nominees for director. Failure to
return a properly executed proxy card or to vote at the meeting will have the
effect of a vote "AGAINST" approval of the merger agreement.
RECORD DATE AND QUORUM REQUIREMENT
The board of directors has fixed the close of business on August 7, 2001,
as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to receive
notice of, and vote at, the annual meeting. Bank Plus is authorized to issue
78,500,000 shares of common stock, which is the only class of Bank Plus' capital
stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting. On the record date, 19,476,696
shares of common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote.
Each share of common stock entitles the record holder on the record date to
one vote on each proposal to be voted on at the annual meeting. A majority of
the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote shall constitute a
quorum. Abstentions, including those stockholders who attend the annual meeting
but abstain from voting, and those stockholders who return their proxy cards to
Bank Plus indicating abstention from voting, will be treated as shares present
and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. If a
broker indicates on the proxy that it does not have discretionary authority as
to certain shares to vote on a particular matter, those shares will not be
considered as present and entitled to vote with respect to that matter.
REQUIRED VOTE
Adoption and approval of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote
of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Bank Plus common stock
entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Directors will be elected by a plurality
of the votes of the shares of common stock represented in person or by proxy and
entitled to vote on the election of directors. Any stockholder proposals that
properly come before the annual meeting will require the affirmative vote of a
majority of the shares of common stock present, in person or represented by
proxy, at the annual meeting.
A failure to vote on the merger agreement, an abstention from voting on the
merger, or a broker non-vote on the merger agreement will have the same legal
effect as a vote cast AGAINST approval of the merger agreement. Executed but
unmarked proxies will be voted "FOR" the adoption and approval of the merger
agreement and "FOR" the election of each of Mr. Smith, Mr. Mason and Mr. Barker
to the Bank Plus board of directors. Brokers, and in many cases nominees, will
not have discretionary power to vote on the proposals to be presented at the
annual meeting. Accordingly, beneficial owners of shares must instruct their
brokers or nominees how to vote their shares with respect to the approval of the
merger agreement and election of directors at the annual meeting. You are urged
to read and carefully consider the information presented in this proxy statement
and to complete, date and sign the accompanying proxy card and return it
promptly to us in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope.
ADJOURNMENT
Although it is not expected, our annual meeting may be adjourned for the
purpose of soliciting additional proxies to a date not later than 60 days after
the date of the annual meeting without fixing a new record date. As long as the
meeting is adjourned for no longer than 30 days, such adjournment may be made
without notice, other than by an announcement made at the annual meeting, by
approval of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock
represented in person or by proxy at the annual meeting, whether or not a quorum
exists. Any adjournment of the annual meeting for the purpose of soliciting
additional proxies will
11
17
allow Bank Plus stockholders who have already sent in their proxies to revoke
them at any time prior to their use.
VOTING AGREEMENTS
Mr. Gordon V. Smith, chairman of the board, and Mr. Mark K. Mason,
president and chief executive officer of Bank Plus, have entered into voting
agreements with FBOP, dated as of June 2, 2001, whereby each has agreed to vote
his respective beneficially-owned shares of Bank Plus common stock in favor of
the merger agreement. Messrs. Mason and Smith beneficially own in the aggregate
658,712 shares of Bank Plus common stock, representing 3.4% of the total number
of shares of Bank Plus common stock outstanding as of the record date. The
voting agreement is binding on each of Messrs. Mason and Smith only in his
capacity as a stockholder of Bank Plus and not with respect to voting as a
director of Bank Plus. The voting agreements terminate upon the termination of
the merger agreement.
SOLICITATION, PROXY SOLICITOR, REVOCATION AND USE OF PROXIES
We will bear all expenses of the solicitation of proxies in connection with
this proxy statement, including all costs of preparing, assembling, printing and
mailing. We will also reimburse brokers, fiduciaries, custodians and other
nominees for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in sending this proxy
statement and other proxy materials to, and obtaining instructions relating to
such materials from, beneficial owners of Bank Plus common stock. Our
stockholder proxies may be solicited by our directors, officers and employees in
person or by telephone, facsimile or by other means of communication.
We have retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. (to which we refer in this proxy
statement as "D.F. King") to assist in the solicitation of proxies in connection
with our annual meeting. In connection with this proxy solicitation, we will pay
D.F. King a fee estimated not to exceed $6,000, plus reimbursement for
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.
A stockholder giving the enclosed proxy has the power to revoke it at any
time before it is exercised by (1) filing with our corporate secretary a written
notice revoking the proxy before the annual meeting, (2) executing a proxy with
a later date, or (3) attending the annual meeting and voting in person. Any
written notice of revocation should be delivered to Bank Plus Corporation, 4565
Colorado Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90039, Attn: Corporate Secretary.
Subject to proper revocation, all shares of our common stock entitled to vote at
the annual meeting and represented at the annual meeting by properly executed
proxies received by us will be voted in accordance with the instructions
contained in such proxies.
Our board of directors does not intend to present to the meeting any other
matter not referred to above and does not presently know of any matters that may
be presented to the meeting by others. However, if other matters come before the
meeting, it is the intent of the persons named in the enclosed proxy to vote the
proxy in accordance with their best judgment.
PROPOSALS OF STOCKHOLDERS
The matters to be considered at the 2001 annual meeting are limited to
those set forth in the notice of annual meeting accompanying this proxy
statement.
Any stockholder of Bank Plus wishing to submit a proposal for inclusion in
the proxy statement for presentation at the 2002 annual meeting must be received
by us at our principal office at 4565 Colorado Boulevard, Los Angeles,
California 90039 by January 24, 2002. Such proposal must comply with the
provisions of Securities Exchange Commission Rule 14a-8. We suggest that the
proposal be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested. (If the
merger is approved, the board of directors expects that the 2001 annual meeting
will be the last annual meeting for which a proxy statement will be prepared.)
From time to time, our stockholders submit proposals that they believe
should be voted upon at the annual meeting or nominate persons for election to
the board of directors. In accordance with our bylaws, any such proposal or
nomination submitted other than pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 must be
submitted in writing to our corporate secretary not less than 45 days nor more
than 75 days prior to the first anniversary of
12
18
the date of mailing of the proxy statement for the preceding year's annual
meeting of stockholders. This submission must include certain specified
information concerning the proposal or nominee, as the case may be, and
information as to the proponent's ownership of common stock of Bank Plus.
Proposals or nominations not meeting these requirements will not be entertained
at the annual meeting. Our corporate secretary should be contacted in writing at
the address set forth in the preceding paragraph to make any submission or to
obtain additional information as to the proper form and content of submissions.
SURRENDER OF COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATES
American Stock Transfer and Trust Co. (to which we refer in this proxy
statement as "American Stock Transfer") has been designated to act as paying
agent for the benefit of holders of shares of our common stock in connection
with the merger. FBOP will deposit with American Stock Transfer amounts
sufficient, in the aggregate, to provide all funds necessary for American Stock
Transfer to make payments to holders of our common stock in connection with the
completion of the merger, and also to option holders as described below.
Promptly after the date on which the merger is consummated, American Stock
Transfer will send to each holder of shares of our common stock a letter of
transmittal and instructions for use in surrendering the stock certificates. The
letter of transmittal will specify that the delivery will be effected, and risk
of loss and title will pass, only upon delivery of the stock certificates
representing shares of our common stock to American Stock Transfer. American
Stock Transfer will receive a fee of approximately $15,000 as compensation for
its services, plus reimbursement of its out-of-pocket expenses in connection
with such services. We have agreed to indemnify American Stock Transfer against
certain liabilities arising out of or in connection with its engagement.
Each holder of a share of our common stock that has been converted into the
right to receive the per share merger consideration upon surrender to American
Stock Transfer of a stock certificate or certificates representing such shares,
together with a properly completed letter of transmittal covering such shares,
shall receive the cash payment. Until surrendered in this manner, each such
stock certificate will, after the effective time, represent for all purposes
only the right to receive this cash payment. No interest will be paid or will
accrue on the cash payment after the date upon which the merger has been
consummated.
If any portion of the cash payment is to be paid to a person other than the
registered holder of the stock certificate surrendered in exchange therefor, the
stock certificate being surrendered must be properly endorsed or otherwise be in
proper form for transfer. In addition, the person requesting such payment must
pay to American Stock Transfer any transfer or other taxes required as a result
of such payment, or establish that such tax has been paid or is not applicable.
Beginning one year after the closing date, holders of Bank Plus common stock who
have not surrendered their stock certificates will be entitled to look to FBOP
only as general creditors for payment of their claim for cash.
At and after the closing date, there will be no further registration of
transfers of our common stock on our records or those of our transfer agent.
From and after the closing date, the holders of our common stock will cease to
have any rights with respect to such shares except as provided in the merger
agreement or applicable law.
Upon the consummation of the merger, American Stock Transfer will send each
optionholder who will be listed on a schedule that we will provide to it, the
option consideration set forth next to such optionholder's name. This option
consideration will be determined as set forth in the merger agreement and as
described more fully under the caption entitled "The Proposed Merger -- What You
Will Receive in the Merger" beginning on page 14.
13
19
THE PROPOSED MERGER
THE MERGER
Under the terms of the merger agreement, at the effective time, Acquisition
Sub, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FBOP which was formed solely to facilitate the
merger, will merge with and into Bank Plus, with Bank Plus continuing as the
surviving corporation. As a result of the merger, Bank Plus will become a
wholly-owned subsidiary of FBOP, and the separate corporate existence of
Acquisition Sub will cease. Upon completion of the merger, our stockholders will
no longer own any shares of Bank Plus common stock and will not, as a result of
the merger, own any common stock either of FBOP or Acquisition Sub.
WHAT YOU WILL RECEIVE IN THE MERGER
As a Bank Plus stockholder at the effective time of the merger, each of
your shares of our common stock will automatically be converted into the right
to receive $7.25 in cash. If the term of the merger agreement is extended past
December 31, 2001, FBOP will pay interest on the merger consideration at the
prime rate from January 1, 2002 until the closing of the merger. Any interest
paid will have the effect of increasing the $7.25 base per share merger
consideration.
You will have to surrender your Bank Plus common stock certificates to
receive this payment. American Stock Transfer, as paying agent, will send you
written instructions for surrendering your common stock certificates after we
have completed the merger. Do not send your common stock certificates at this
time.
Each option to purchase our common stock outstanding immediately prior to
the effective time (whether vested or unvested) will be canceled. Each holder of
an option who has an exercise price which is below $7.25 per share will receive
a cash payment equal to the product of (a) the positive difference, if any,
between $7.25 minus the option exercise price, multiplied by (b) the total
number of shares subject to the option, less any applicable withholding taxes.
The consideration received by the optionholders is also subject to increase if
the term of the merger agreement is extended beyond December 31, 2001.
BACKGROUND OF THE MERGER
From time to time over the last several years, we have explored strategic
alternatives to maximize stockholder value, including a possible sale of Bank
Plus. We found it difficult to remain as an independent, relatively small
regional thrift institution. As a result of the significant losses we had
incurred in the early 1990's in our multi-family loan portfolio and the need to
reduce our total assets to maintain capital adequacy, in 1994, we terminated our
lending operations. After significant recapitalizations in 1994 and 1995, we
sought to find new lending and other business opportunities that would provide
higher returns than traditional real estate lending. This focus on new
opportunities led, among other things, to our implementation of new credit card
lending programs in 1997. Those programs generated significant losses commencing
in the third quarter of 1998 and eventually resulted in significant litigation.
As a result, in the third and fourth quarters of 1998, our board made
changes in our senior management, and we embarked on a turnaround plan that
involved selling certain assets, resolving outstanding litigation and improving
Fidelity's profitability and regulatory capital. Additionally, given our prior
lack of success with our credit card programs and the cost, risk and time
associated with starting up new lending programs, we pursued a merger with a
larger institution. We held preliminary discussions with several parties,
including FBOP, but the pending consumer litigation against Fidelity from the
credit card programs rendered us an unattractive acquisition candidate, and we
received no definitive offers.
By the end of the third quarter of 2000, we had successfully completed the
major elements of our turnaround plan and had returned to overall profitability.
As a result, we believed our company was now salable, and in November 2000, our
board engaged Sandler O'Neill as our financial advisor. On November 29, 2000,
Sandler O'Neill presented its marketing plan for Bank Plus at a joint meeting of
the boards of directors of Bank Plus and Fidelity. At that meeting, our boards
appointed a joint special committee composed of
14
20
directors Gordon Smith, Irving Beimler, Mark Mason, Robert Medearis, Jeffrey
Susskind and Craig Tompkins who were charged with working with management and
Sandler O'Neill to oversee the sale process.
In December 2000, a financial institution (to which we refer in this proxy
statement as "Company A") which had held discussions with us in the past,
contacted Mr. Mason to indicate a renewed interest in acquiring Bank Plus.
Company A expressed an interest in conducting preliminary due diligence prior to
a formal marketing process with the intention of making an acquisition proposal
that would preempt that marketing process. During the week of December 20, 2000,
representatives of Company A met with members of our senior management at our
corporate offices and conducted on-site due diligence. Company A did not make a
formal offer at that time, but indicated that it would like some time to discuss
and evaluate the information it received during its diligence.
During the month of January 2001, our management and Sandler O'Neill, in
consultation with the special committee, continued to work on the marketing
process, including the preparation of a marketing book for distribution to
potential buyers in early February. During this time, we received unsolicited
indications of interest from several potential acquirers, although none of these
parties made any formal offers during this period.
On January 26, 2001, Company A contacted Mr. Mason to advise him that
Company A had completed its initial evaluation and was prepared to make a
preliminary non-binding offer for our outstanding stock at a price of $5.00 per
share, subject to the completion of its due diligence and our entering into
exclusive negotiations to reach a definitive agreement.
Mr. Mason reported Company A's offer at the special committee's meeting on
January 29, 2001. After discussing the matter and receiving advice from Sandler
O'Neill, the special committee concluded that the $5.00 per share offer from
Company A was not preemptive and did not warrant exclusive negotiations. Thus,
the special committee determined that the marketing effort should continue. In
addition, the special committee instructed Bank Plus' management to seek a
higher price from Company A.
On January 31, 2001, Bank Plus and Fidelity held a joint board meeting at
which Mr. Mason and Sandler O'Neill advised the directors of the preliminary
offer from Company A and on the status and timing of our marketing effort.
Sandler O'Neill presented our board with the final version of the confidential
offering memorandum that was scheduled to be distributed to potential buyers
during early February, unless Company A substantially improved its preliminary
offer before that time. Our board resolved, in light of the potential sale
transaction, that our 2001 annual meeting of stockholders be delayed to avoid
the expense of two proxy solicitations.
On February 5, 2001, Company A increased its offer to $6.00 per share,
subject to the finalization of Company A's diligence review and the negotiation
of a definitive agreement. Company A informed us that it expected exclusive
negotiations with us in connection with this offer.
On February 6, 2001, the special committee met to consider the terms of the
revised offer from Company A. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, our legal advisors,
reviewed with the special committee its fiduciary duties to our stockholders.
The special committee authorized our chairman and management to negotiate with
Company A to achieve a higher offering price, and, so as not to jeopardize those
negotiations, further resolved to temporarily defer the broader marketing
process.
On February 8, 2001, our chairman and management, together with Sandler
O'Neill, met with Company A and its financial representatives to negotiate the
terms of Company A's offer. As the result of this meeting, Company A proposed to
acquire all of our stock for a cash purchase price of $7.00 per share, plus an
upward adjustment to the extent that Fidelity could enter into agreements to
sell (but which could not close until after Company A's acquisition of Bank
Plus) its multi-family and commercial loan portfolio at a price above an
agreed-upon minimum. The offer was conditioned upon, among other things, our
negotiating exclusively with Company A to reach a definitive merger agreement.
The special committee met on February 12, 2001 to consider Company A's
revised offer. The special committee resolved to recommend to the full boards of
Bank Plus and Fidelity that our management be
15
21
authorized to conduct exclusive negotiations with Company A through February 28,
2001 upon the terms outlined in Company A's most recent proposal. The full
boards approved this recommendation during a telephonic joint board meeting the
next day.
In mid-February 2001, the Office of Thrift Supervision (to which we refer
in this proxy statement as the "OTS") advised Fidelity that it was concluding
its review of Fidelity's conduct in connection with Fidelity's discontinued
credit card operations, and that it would require no further corrective actions
from Fidelity. As a result of our discussions with the OTS, we formed a belief
that the OTS might refer certain fair lending issues relating to Fidelity's
discontinued credit card programs to the Department of Justice for
investigation.
Mr. Mason then advised Company A that we believed the OTS had referred or
was likely to refer the fair lending issues to the Department of Justice for
investigation. Company A responded that it was not willing to execute a
definitive acquisition agreement so long as any Department of Justice
investigation or related litigation remained pending or threatened against
Fidelity. Company A also indicated that it had certain additional valuation
issues resulting from their due diligence that could affect the purchase price.
On February 26, 2001, our board held a meeting at which Mr. Mason reported
these new developments. Sandler O'Neill informed the board that a Department of
Justice investigation would adversely affect our ability to broadly market the
company and successfully conduct an auction. Our board determined that
management should temporarily suspend further marketing efforts and try to
expedite resolution of any investigation by the Department of Justice. Given
Company A's positions, we no longer considered ourselves bound to negotiate
exclusively with Company A.
On March 2, 2001, Mr. Mason received an inquiry from another financial
institution (to which we refer in this proxy statement as "Company B")
expressing a preliminary indication of interest in a possible acquisition of
Bank Plus. Mr. Mason responded that we were currently conducting discussions
with another potential buyer and described the Department of Justice referral
issue, asking Company B whether it would still be interested in continuing
discussions, given the circumstances. Company B subsequently confirmed its
interest in a potential acquisition transaction, but did not make a more
specific proposal.
At a meeting on March 5, 2001, Mr. Mason updated the special committee of
recent events, and the special committee instructed management to explore the
feasibility of a prompt resolution with the Department of Justice. In addition,
the special committee instructed management to seek Company A's agreement to
proceed with a definitive agreement under which the closing would be subject to
resolution of the Department of Justice matter, and the purchase price would be
adjusted for the cost of that resolution. The special committee instructed our
management to advise Company A that if it did not agree to proceed on this basis
within a relatively short period of time, the special committee would authorize
our management to initiate a broader marketing effort. Such a broader marketing
effort would have been contingent on ascertaining the feasibility, cost and
timing of a resolution of the Department of Justice matter. Thereafter, our
management continued to negotiate with Company A in an effort to restructure the
terms of the acquisition transaction in the manner instructed by the special
committee.
On March 27, 2001, Mr. Mason met with representatives of Company B to
discuss their interest in an acquisition of Bank Plus. At the conclusion of that
meeting, Company B did not indicate an interest in conducting further
discussions of an acquisition transaction.
On March 28, 2001, our management held a negotiating session with Company A
that resulted in Company A submitting a revised, non-binding proposal to acquire
Bank Plus. Under the terms of the revised proposal, the base acquisition price
was $6.50 per share in cash, subject to a possible increase if we arranged for
the post-merger sale of Fidelity's multi-family and commercial loan portfolio at
a price above an agreed-upon minimum. Execution of a definitive acquisition
agreement would not be subject to resolution of the Department of Justice
matter. However, the closing of the acquisition would be conditioned on
resolution of this matter, and the purchase price would be decreased by the
amount of Fidelity's costs of resolution. The special committee held a meeting
on March 30, 2001 to review this revised offer and instructed management to
continue to negotiate with Company A on the basis of these new proposed terms.
16
22
During the first two weeks of April, our management and our legal and
financial advisors continued to negotiate with Company A with the goal of
reaching a definitive agreement for consideration at the joint meeting of the
Bank Plus and Fidelity boards scheduled for April 26, 2001.
On April 17, 2001, FBOP contacted Sandler O'Neill to express its interest
in acquiring Bank Plus. Two years earlier, we had engaged in preliminary
discussions with FBOP concerning a possible acquisition of Bank Plus, but FBOP
withdrew its interest in light of the then-pending consumer litigation against
Fidelity arising from our credit card programs. FBOP submitted a preliminary,
non-binding proposal to purchase all of our outstanding common stock for a
purchase price of $6.50 per share in cash. The proposal was subject to, among
other things, FBOP's completion of its due diligence review, the negotiation and
execution of a definitive agreement and receipt of all regulatory and
stockholder approvals. While FBOP informed us that it would need to raise
additional capital to close the acquisition, it did not condition its offer on
the raising of additional capital. Mr. Mason consulted with members of the
special committee and determined to refuse to allow FBOP to conduct due
diligence unless it improved its offer to at least $7.00 per share.
On April 18, 2001, Sandler O'Neill informed FBOP that its proposal was not
demonstrably superior to the current offer from Company A, particularly in light
of FBOP's need to raise capital to complete the transaction. (During the
negotiations with FBOP, Bank Plus did not disclose the identity of Company A.)
Consequently, Sandler O'Neill informed FBOP that we were not willing to allow
FBOP to conduct due diligence and thereby jeopardize our negotiations with
Company A unless FBOP improved its offer to at least $7.00 per share. FBOP
replied that it would consider the matter further and return with a different
proposal if it wished to continue to pursue an acquisition.
On April 23, 2001, FBOP submitted a revised preliminary proposal,
increasing its non-binding offer to $7.00 per share in cash. The other terms and
conditions remained the same as in the prior offer, except that the revised
proposal made it clear that the closing of FBOP's proposed transaction would not
be subject to the resolution of the Department of Justice matter.
On April 23, 2001, the special committee met to discuss the revised FBOP
offer and the status of the negotiations with Company A. Sandler O'Neill and Mr.
Mason outlined the differences between the two existing proposals. Among other
things, Company A's base price, at $6.50 per share, was lower than the FBOP
proposal at $7.00 per share. Although Company A's proposal included the
possibility of an increase above $6.50 per share, depending on the proceeds from
the possible sale of the multi-family and commercial loan portfolios, it also
included the possibility of a purchase price reduction relating to a resolution
of the Department of Justice matter. The special committee also discussed
various other differences between the two proposals, including the Department of
Justice resolution condition to closing in Company A's proposal. Counsel
provided the members of the special committee with legal advice concerning their
fiduciary duties. The special committee determined to allow FBOP to commence its
due diligence review on an expedited basis, while simultaneously continuing to
pursue the transaction with Company A.
On April 24, 2001, Mr. Mason advised Company A that we had received an
unsolicited competing offer from another party. (During the negotiations with
Company A, Bank Plus did not identify the other party as FBOP.) Mr. Mason
further advised Company A that the special committee had determined to allow
FBOP to commence diligence. Mr. Mason informed Company A that we could no longer
negotiate exclusively with Company A and invited Company A to improve its
existing offer.
On April 25, 2001, the boards of Bank Plus and Fidelity held a regularly
scheduled joint board meeting. Mr. Mason updated the boards on the status of the
proposals from Company A and FBOP. Sandler O'Neill advised the boards that it
had received an unsolicited contact from another financial institution (to which
we refer in this proxy statement as "Company C"), asking to be included in any
marketing effort.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher advised the board members as to their fiduciary
duties under Delaware law. Sandler O'Neill then provided the boards with an
updated valuation report and an evaluation of the proposals from FBOP and
Company A. Sandler O'Neill advised the boards that it was comfortable that FBOP
could raise the necessary capital to conclude the transaction. Sandler O'Neill
further confirmed that FBOP's $7.00 per share offer was at the high end of the
range of prices that we could expect to receive from a broader
17
23
marketing effort. Sandler O'Neill and management identified four other financial
institutions of significant size who had either previously expressed an interest
in an acquisition of Bank Plus, or, in the opinion of Sandler O'Neill, were most
likely to have significant interest in an acquisition. The boards instructed
Sandler O'Neill to contact these parties within the next week and solicit
expressions of interest and indicative pricing.
On April 27, 2001, our management and advisors held a conference call with
Company A and their advisors to discuss the status of the merger negotiations.
Company A stated that it was not prepared to change its existing offer at that
time. The parties agreed that they would temporarily suspend negotiations until
FBOP had completed its due diligence and submitted a more definitive offer.
On April 30, 2001, Mr. Mason reported to the directors of Bank Plus and
Fidelity that, of the four companies contacted by Sandler O'Neill, one of the
companies was not interested and the other three would respond shortly.
During the first week of May 2001, FBOP conducted its due diligence review
at our corporate offices. Upon the completion FBOP's diligence, FBOP advised us
that, while it still did not expect that it would be necessary to make the
resolution of the Department of Justice matter a condition to closing, it was in
the process of valuing the risks involved and might need to reduce its current
offer price from $7.00.
On May 9, 2001, FBOP submitted a revised proposal to purchase Bank Plus at
a price of $6.50 per share in cash, but otherwise on substantially the same
terms as its prior proposal. FBOP confirmed that it was willing to proceed
without a contingency or a price adjustment for resolution of the Department of
Justice matter.
On May 10, 2001, the special committee held a conference call to discuss
the revised FBOP offer. Mr. Mason reported that another of the four companies
recently solicited had confirmed that it was not interested and that the
remaining two companies were still considering the matter, but were not acting
aggressively. Consequently, the special committee determined to pursue a
transaction with either Company A or FBOP and instructed our management to
contact both companies concurrently to encourage them to improve the price and
terms of their current offers.
Mr. Mason then contacted FBOP and suggested that FBOP improve its offer by
increasing the purchase price and by providing us with some comfort that FBOP
could both raise sufficient capital and obtain the necessary regulatory
approvals to complete the transaction. Mr. Mason also asked FBOP to comment on
the draft merger agreement that we had previously provided to FBOP. FBOP
declined to raise its offered purchase price at that time.
Mr. Mason also spoke with Company A, and suggested that Company A improve
its offer price and remove the proposed purchase price reduction associated with
the resolution of the Department of Justice matter, as well as the requirement
that such resolution be a condition to the closing of the merger.
On May 14, 2001, FBOP provided us with preliminary comments to the draft
merger agreement and confirmed that FBOP was not willing to increase its last
offer of $6.50 per share.
On May 17, 2001, Company A submitted a revised proposal at $6.75 per share,
with no upward adjustment for the sale of the loan portfolio. Resolution of the
Department of Justice matter remained a condition to closing, and the proposal
also included a dollar for dollar purchase price reduction for any resolution
costs over a certain threshold.
On May 17, 2001, the special committee held a telephonic meeting to discuss
the latest offers from Company A and FBOP. Sandler O'Neill stated that it would
be able to opine that either transaction would be fair to our stockholders from
a financial point of view. Because the special committee did not reach a clear
consensus in favor of one transaction over the other, a full meeting of the
boards of Bank Plus and Fidelity was scheduled to discuss the merits of each
offer.
The boards of Bank Plus and Fidelity met telephonically on May 21, 2001.
The boards determined that our management should continue to negotiate with both
Company A and FBOP until it became clear that one proposal was materially
superior to the other.
18
24
On May 23, 2001, Company A submitted a revised proposal to us increasing
its offer to $7.00 per share, with a potential purchase price increase to the
extent that Fidelity could find buyers for its multi-family and commercial loan
portfolio at a price above an agreed-upon minimum. The resolution of the
Department of Justice matter remained a condition to closing and the purchase
price would also be decreased dollar for dollar to reflect any costs incurred in
resolving this matter. This revised offer was also conditioned upon Bank Plus
and Fidelity agreeing to forego any further acquisition negotiations with other
parties.
On May 25, 2001, Mr. Mason called FBOP to inform it of a meeting of the
boards to determine which offer to pursue. Mr. Mason advised FBOP that a
competing offer had been enhanced and was possibly superior to FBOP's, and
inquired as to whether the last offer from FBOP was its best and final. FBOP
replied that it had, in fact, extended its best offer.
On May 25, 2001, the boards of Bank Plus and Fidelity held a telephonic
joint meeting. The board members, management and their advisors discussed the
proposed terms of both offers. The boards concurred that Company A's offer was
superior and that management should finalize a definitive agreement with Company
A, subject to final board approval.
At a joint board meeting on May 30, 2001, management gave a report on the
financial and regulatory diligence conducted with respect to Company A. Our
boards reviewed the principal terms of the merger agreement with Company A and
current drafts of the definitive documents. Our management advised the boards
that a few issues in the agreements remained to be finalized, but that
management did not view these issues to be material. Sandler O'Neill reviewed
its presentation material with the directors and gave its opinion that the
proposed transaction with Company A would be fair to our stockholders from a
financial point of view. After being advised of their respective legal and
fiduciary obligations, our boards approved the transaction with Company A.
On May 31, 2001, Company A reviewed the disclosure schedules to the merger
agreement with various members of our management. In addition, we discussed
various details relating to the definitive documents. Company A requested
further changes to the transaction terms, necessitating further approval by our
boards.
On the morning of June 1, Sandler O'Neill responded to a call that Mr.
Mason had received from FBOP. Upon learning that our boards were moving forward
with Company A's transaction, FBOP increased its offer to $6.75 per share and
also offered to place $5 million in escrow, which would be forfeited if FBOP
failed to obtain regulatory approval to consummate its proposed acquisition.
After discussing this new offer with Mr. Mason, Sandler O'Neill advised FBOP
that a joint board meeting was convening shortly and asked FBOP to confirm that
$6.75 per share was its best and final offer, which FBOP so confirmed.
In the early afternoon of June 1, we held a telephonic joint board meeting
to discuss the revisions to the Company A transaction and the recent offer from
FBOP. The boards noted that the base price of $7.00 per share in the Company A
transaction remained superior to the $6.75 per share offered by FBOP. The boards
concluded that any reduction in the price offered by Company A based upon costs
necessary to resolve the Department of Justice matter could be more than offset
by potential price increases attributable to sales of our multi-family and
commercial loan portfolios. Further, we had not yet commenced meaningful
negotiation of the definitive documents with FBOP, and FBOP had not reviewed any
disclosure schedules relating to a definitive merger agreement. In contrast, the
documentation and disclosure schedules for the Company A transaction were
substantially complete, providing greater certainty of execution of a definitive
agreement. Finally, we were concerned with Company A's position that it would
abandon the transaction if we were to engage in any further acquisition
discussions with any third party. Therefore, while the Company A transaction
remained subject to resolution of the Department of Justice matter, our boards
nevertheless concluded that the Company A transaction was superior to the FBOP
offer.
Later that afternoon, as final preparations were being made to execute
definitive agreements with Company A, FBOP called again and increased its offer
to $7.00 per share. Mr. Mason stated that execution of the documents with
Company A was imminent and that he believed FBOP's new offer would not be
sufficient to warrant jeopardizing the transaction with Company A. Mr. Mason
then discussed the revised offer with our chairman and other members of the
boards. Shortly thereafter, FBOP called back. Mr. Mason suggested that
19
25
a price of $7.50 per share might be required to persuade our boards to abandon
the Company A transaction at this late stage. FBOP was only willing to increase
its offer price to $7.25 per share, but it committed to negotiating and
executing a definitive merger agreement within the next 24 hours.
That evening, after consulting with Mr. Smith and our advisors, Mr. Mason
advised Company A that we had received a revised offer from FBOP that appeared
to be superior to Company A's existing offer. After hours of deliberation,
Company A advised us that it was unwilling to raise its existing offer. Company
A then executed a copy of the definitive documentation we had negotiated and
left them in our possession, advising us that their offer on the terms of those
agreements would expire at 6:00 p.m. on Saturday, June 2.
That night, we drafted a definitive merger agreement, accompanying
disclosure schedules and related agreements for delivery to FBOP early on the
morning of June 2. During the morning and early afternoon of June 2, we
negotiated the final terms of the definitive documents with FBOP.
Our boards convened a telephonic joint meeting at 11:00 a.m. to discuss the
offers from FBOP and Company A, including the imminent deadline on Company A's
offer. The boards concluded that the FBOP offer was superior, and authorized
management to continue negotiations with FBOP, with a view to having a
definitive agreement with FBOP available for execution in the next few hours.
The meeting was then adjourned until 3:30 p.m.
Our management and advisors continued to work with FBOP and its advisors on
the merger agreement and related matters for the next several hours. When the
telephonic joint board meeting reconvened at 3:30 p.m., our management updated
the boards on the final terms of the proposed transaction. Sandler O'Neill
advised the boards that it had conducted due diligence on FBOP, including a
review of FBOP's financial statements and business plan and discussions with
FBOP's senior management. Based upon that review and the current state of the
capital markets, Sandler O'Neill believed that FBOP should be able to raise the
capital necessary to consummate the merger. Sandler O'Neill then opined that the
proposed transaction with FBOP was fair to our stockholders from a financial
point of view. At 4:00 p.m., our counsel advised the boards that the definitive
documentation for the FBOP transaction had been finalized. Shortly thereafter,
we received a facsimile copy of FBOP's executed signature pages for the
definitive agreements. Our boards of directors then rescinded their prior
approvals of the proposed merger agreement with Company A and authorized the
merger agreement with FBOP. Immediately thereafter, we executed the merger
agreement with FBOP.
REASONS FOR THE MERGER AND RECOMMENDATION OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
At a board meeting on June 2, 2001, the board of directors of Bank Plus
determined that the merger is fair to and in the best interests of Bank Plus and
its stockholders and, by the unanimous vote of all the directors present at the
meeting, approved and adopted the merger agreement and the merger. The board
subsequently ratified its approval at a meeting at which all members were
present and unanimously voted in favor of the merger and the merger agreement.
ACCORDINGLY, THE BANK PLUS BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU
VOTE "FOR" APPROVAL OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AT THE ANNUAL MEETING.
The board of directors believes that the terms of the merger agreement,
which are the product of arm's length negotiations between representatives of
FBOP and Bank Plus, are fair and in the best interests of Bank Plus and its
stockholders. In the course of reaching its determination, the board of
directors consulted with its legal counsel regarding its legal duties, the terms
of the merger agreement and related issues; with its financial advisors,
regarding the financial aspects and the fairness of the transaction; and with
senior management of Bank Plus and Fidelity regarding, among other things,
operational matters.
In reaching its determination to approve the merger agreement, the board of
directors considered all factors it deemed material. The board of directors
analyzed information with respect to the financial condition, results of
operations, businesses and prospects of Bank Plus and its subsidiaries. In this
regard, the board of directors considered the performance trends of Bank Plus
and its subsidiaries over the past several years. The board of directors
compared Bank Plus' current and anticipated future consolidated operating
results to publicly available financial and other information for other
similarly sized banking institutions in California. The board of directors noted
that the financial and operating performance of Bank Plus over recent periods
did
20
26
not compare favorably with Bank Plus' peer group (see "The Proposed
Merger -- Opinion of Financial Advisor -- Comparable Company Analysis" beginning
on page 25.) The board of directors used this information in analyzing the
options available to Bank Plus.
In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement and the merger,
the board of directors also considered a number of factors, including the
following:
1. The merger represents an opportunity for Bank Plus' stockholders to
realize a premium over recent market prices for their common stock. The
merger price per share represents a 36.8% premium over the closing price of
our common stock on the day before the merger was announced, and a 41.4%
premium over the average closing price of our common stock for the
four-week period immediately preceding the merger announcement.
2. The board of directors considered the opinion of Sandler O'Neill,
as of June 2, 2001, and updated through the date of this proxy statement,
made to the board of directors that the cash payment of $7.25 per share was
fair to Bank Plus' stockholders from a financial point of view as described
under "The Proposed Merger -- Opinion of Our Financial Advisor" beginning
on page 22.) The board of directors reviewed the assumptions and results of
the various valuation methodologies employed by Sandler O'Neill in arriving
at its opinion and found those assumptions and results to be reasonable.
3. The board of directors considered the current operating
environment, including but not limited to the continued consolidation and
increasing competition in the banking and financial services industries,
the prospects for further changes in these industries, and the importance
of being able to capitalize on developing opportunities in these
industries. The board of directors also considered the current and
prospective economic and competitive conditions facing Bank Plus and its
subsidiaries in its market areas.
4. The board of directors reviewed the terms and conditions of the
merger agreement, including the parties' respective representations,
warranties and covenants, the conditions to closing and the fact that the
merger agreement permits Bank Plus' board of directors, in the exercise of
its fiduciary duties, under certain conditions, to furnish information to,
or engage in negotiations with third parties, and to terminate the merger
agreement if Bank Plus' board of directors determines that a superior
proposal has been made, subject to payment of a break-up fee (see "The
Merger Agreement -- Expenses and Termination Fee" beginning on page 38) and
generally found such terms and conditions to be favorable to Bank Plus.
Although the merger is not subject to a financing condition, the board of
directors considered the ability of FBOP to pay the aggregate purchase
price, and accordingly, together with its financial advisors and
management, reviewed FBOP's financial condition, results of operations,
liquidity and capital position.
5. The board of directors considered the likelihood of the merger
being approved by the appropriate regulatory authorities. See "The Proposed
Merger -- Regulatory Approvals" beginning on page 28.
6. The board of directors examined current financial market conditions
and historical market prices, volatility and trading information with
respect to shares of Bank Plus common stock. In particular, the board noted
the recent fluctuations in Bank Plus' stock price, from lows such as $3.50
as recently as January 11, 2001, to a high of $5.875 on March 30, 2001.
7. The board of directors considered the merger's impact on Bank Plus'
customers and employees. The board viewed the impact on customers and
employees as positive, in that they would become part of a geographically
diversified institution with greater resources than Bank Plus.
8. The board of directors also considered the fact that the merger
consideration is all cash, which provides certainty of value to Bank Plus'
stockholders as compared to a stock transaction.
9. The Bank Plus board considered the advice of its financial advisor
that the advisor had sought indications of interest from those financial
institutions that were both most likely to have an interest in acquiring
Bank Plus and capable of consummating such an acquisition.
In approving the merger, the board of directors was aware that as a result
of the merger, Bank Plus common stock will no longer be publicly traded.
21
27
This description of the information and factors by considered by our board
of directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but is believed to include all
material factors the board considered. In determining whether to approve and
recommend the merger agreement, our board of directors did not assign any
relative or specific weights to any of the foregoing factors, and individual
directors may have weighed factors differently. After deliberating with respect
to the merger and the merger agreement, considering, among other things, the
reasons discussed above and the opinion of Sandler O'Neill referred to above,
our board of directors approved and adopted the merger agreement and the merger
as being in the best interests of Bank Plus and its stockholders, based on the
total mix of information available to the board.
OPINION OF OUR FINANCIAL ADVISOR
By letter agreement dated as of November 2, 2000, Bank Plus retained
Sandler O'Neill as an independent financial advisor in connection with Bank
Plus' general strategic planning and its consideration of a possible business
combination involving Bank Plus and a second party. Sandler O'Neill is a
nationally recognized investment banking firm whose principal business specialty
is financial institutions. In the ordinary course of its investment banking
business, Sandler O'Neill is regularly engaged in the valuation of financial
institutions and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions
and other corporate transactions.
Sandler O'Neill acted as financial advisor to Bank Plus in connection with
the proposed merger with FBOP and participated in certain of the negotiations
leading to the merger agreement. At the request of the Bank Plus board,
representatives of Sandler O'Neill participated in the June 2, 2001 telephonic
meeting at which the board considered and approved the merger. At that meeting,
Sandler O'Neill delivered to the Bank Plus board its oral opinion, subsequently
confirmed in writing, that, as of such date, the merger consideration was fair
to Bank Plus stockholders from a financial point of view. Sandler O'Neill has
also delivered to the Bank Plus board a written opinion dated the date of this
proxy statement which is substantially identical to the June 2, 2001 opinion.
THE FULL TEXT OF SANDLER O'NEILL'S OPINION IS ATTACHED AS ANNEX B TO THIS PROXY
STATEMENT. THE OPINION OUTLINES THE PROCEDURES FOLLOWED, ASSUMPTIONS MADE,
MATTERS CONSIDERED AND QUALIFICATIONS AND LIMITATIONS ON THE REVIEW UNDERTAKEN
BY SANDLER O'NEILL IN RENDERING THE OPINION. THE DESCRIPTION OF THE OPINION SET
FORTH BELOW IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE OPINION. YOU ARE
URGED TO READ THE OPINION CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY IN CONNECTION WITH YOUR
CONSIDERATION OF THE PROPOSED MERGER.
SANDLER O'NEILL'S OPINION WAS DIRECTED TO THE BANK PLUS BOARD AND WAS
PROVIDED TO THE BOARD FOR ITS INFORMATION IN CONSIDERING THE MERGER. THE OPINION
IS DIRECTED ONLY TO THE FAIRNESS OF THE MERGER CONSIDERATION TO BANK PLUS
STOCKHOLDERS FROM A FINANCIAL POINT OF VIEW. IT DOES NOT ADDRESS THE UNDERLYING
BUSINESS DECISION OF BANK PLUS TO ENGAGE IN THE MERGER OR ANY OTHER ASPECT OF
THE MERGER AND IS NOT A RECOMMENDATION TO ANY BANK PLUS STOCKHOLDER AS TO HOW
SUCH STOCKHOLDER SHOULD VOTE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING WITH RESPECT TO THE MERGER OR
ANY OTHER MATTER.
In connection with rendering its June 2, 2001 opinion, Sandler O'Neill
reviewed and considered, among other things:
(1) the merger agreement and certain of the exhibits and schedules
thereto;
(2) certain publicly available financial statements and other
historical financial information of Bank Plus that they deemed relevant;
(3) certain publicly available financial statements and other
historical financial information of FBOP that they deemed relevant;
(4) certain financial analyses and forecasts of Bank Plus reviewed
with management of Bank Plus;
(5) the views of senior management of Bank Plus, based on discussions
with members of senior management, regarding Bank Plus' business, financial
condition, results of operations and future prospects;
(6) the views of the chairman of the board of FBOP, based on limited
discussions with him, regarding FBOP's financial condition and results of
operations;
22
28
(7) the publicly reported historical price and trading activity for
Bank Plus' common stock, including a comparison of certain financial and
stock market information for Bank Plus with similar publicly available
information for certain other companies the securities of which are
publicly traded;
(8) the financial terms of recent comparable business combinations in
the savings institution industry, to the extent publicly available;
(9) the current market environment generally and the banking
environment in particular; and
(10) such other information, financial studies, analyses and
investigations and financial, economic and market criteria as they
considered relevant.
In performing its reviews and analyses and in rendering its opinion,
Sandler O'Neill assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all the
financial information, analyses and other information that was publicly
available or otherwise furnished to, reviewed by or discussed with it and
further relied on the assurances of management of Bank Plus and FBOP that they
were not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make such information
inaccurate or misleading. Sandler O'Neill was not asked to and did not undertake
an independent verification of the accuracy or completeness of any of such
information and they did not assume any responsibility or liability for the
accuracy or completeness of any of such information. Sandler O'Neill did not
make an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets, the collateral
securing assets or the liabilities, contingent or otherwise, of Bank Plus or
FBOP or any of their respective subsidiaries, or the collectibility of any such
assets, nor was it furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals. Sandler
O'Neill is not an expert in the evaluation of allowances for loan losses and it
has not made an independent evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan
losses of Bank Plus or FBOP, nor has it reviewed any individual credit files
relating to Bank Plus or FBOP. With Bank Plus' consent, Sandler O'Neill has
assumed that the respective allowances for loan losses for both Bank Plus and
FBOP are adequate to cover such losses. In addition, Sandler O'Neill has not
conducted any physical inspection of the properties or facilities of Bank Plus
or FBOP. Sandler O'Neill is not an accounting firm and they relied, with Bank
Plus' consent, on the reports of the independent accountants of Bank Plus and
FBOP for the accuracy and completeness of the audited financial statements
furnished to them. As to all legal or regulatory matters affecting Bank Plus,
Sandler O'Neill relied, with Bank Plus' consent, on the advice of Bank Plus'
counsel.
Sandler O'Neill's opinion was necessarily based upon market, economic and
other conditions as they existed on, and could be evaluated as of, the date of
its opinion. Sandler O'Neill assumed, in all respects material to its analysis,
that all of the representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement
and all related agreements are true and correct, that each party to such
agreements will perform all of the covenants required to be performed by such
party under such agreements and that the conditions precedent in the merger
agreement are not waived. Sandler O'Neill also assumed, with Bank Plus' consent,
that there has been no material change in Bank Plus' and FBOP's assets,
financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects since the date
of the last financial statements made available to them, that Bank Plus and FBOP
will remain as going concerns for all periods relevant to its analyses, and that
the merger will be accounted for as a purchase transaction and will not be a
taxable transaction at the corporate level for federal income tax purposes.
In rendering its June 2, 2001 opinion, Sandler O'Neill performed a variety
of financial analyses. The following is a summary of the material analyses
performed by Sandler O'Neill, but is not a complete description of all the
analyses underlying Sandler O'Neill's opinion. The summary includes information
presented in tabular format. IN ORDER TO FULLY UNDERSTAND THE FINANCIAL
ANALYSES, THESE TABLES MUST BE READ TOGETHER WITH THE ACCOMPANYING TEXT. THE
TABLES ALONE DO NOT CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE FINANCIAL ANALYSES.
The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving subjective
judgments as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis
and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances. The
process, therefore, is not necessarily susceptible to a partial analysis or
summary description. Sandler O'Neill believes that its analyses must be
considered as a whole and that selecting portions of the factors and analyses
considered without considering all factors and analyses, or attempting to
ascribe relative weights to some or all such factors and analyses, could create
an incomplete view of the evaluation process underlying its opinion. Also, no
company included in Sandler O'Neill's comparative
23
29
analyses described below is identical to Bank Plus and no transaction is
identical to the merger. Accordingly, an analysis of comparable companies or
transactions involves complex considerations and judgments concerning
differences in financial and operating characteristics of the companies and
other factors that could affect the public trading values or merger transaction
values, as the case may be, of Bank Plus or the companies to which it is being
compared.
The earnings projections for Bank Plus relied upon by Sandler O'Neill in
its analyses were based upon internal projections of Bank Plus for the years
ended December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2002. With respect to such financial
projections, Bank Plus' management confirmed to Sandler O'Neill that they had
been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments of such management of the future financial performance
of Bank Plus and Sandler O'Neill assumed for purposes of its analyses that such
performance would be achieved. Sandler O'Neill expressed no opinion as to such
financial projections or the assumptions on which they were based. The financial
projections furnished to Sandler O'Neill by Bank Plus were prepared for internal
purposes only and not with a view towards public disclosure. These projections
were based on numerous variables and assumptions which are inherently uncertain
and, accordingly, actual results could vary materially from those set forth in
such projections.
In performing its analyses, Sandler O'Neill also made numerous assumptions
with respect to industry performance, business and economic conditions and
various other matters, many of which cannot be predicted and are beyond the
control of Bank Plus, FBOP and Sandler O'Neill. The analyses performed by
Sandler O'Neill are not necessarily indicative of actual values or future
results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by
such analyses. Sandler O'Neill prepared its analyses solely for purposes of
rendering its opinion and provided such analyses to the Bank Plus board at the
June 2, 2001 meeting. Estimates on the values of companies do not purport to be
appraisals or necessarily reflect the prices at which companies or their
securities may actually be sold. Such estimates are inherently subject to
uncertainty and actual values may be materially different. Accordingly, Sandler
O'Neill's analyses do not necessarily reflect the value of Bank Plus' common
stock or the prices at which Bank Plus' common stock may be sold at any time.
Summary of Proposal. Sandler O'Neill reviewed the financial terms of the
proposed transaction. Based upon the per share consideration of $7.25 and Bank
Plus' March 31, 2001 financial information, Sandler O'Neill calculated the
following ratios:
<Table>
Transaction value/LTM EPS(1)................................ 23.39x
Transaction value/2001 estimated EPS(2)..................... 21.70x
Transaction value/book value................................ 202.59%
Transaction value/tangible book value....................... 236.35%
Transaction value/deposits.................................. 7.16%
Tangible book premium/core deposits(3)...................... 5.31%
</Table>
- ---------------
(1) Based on $0.31 LTM EPS from continuing operations.
(2) Based on management expectations of $0.33 2001 EPS from continuing
operations.
(3) Assumes 75% of Bank Plus deposits are core deposits.
The aggregate transaction value is approximately $147.3 million based upon
the per share consideration of $7.25, 19,476,696 shares of Bank Plus common
stock outstanding and in-the-money options outstanding to purchase an aggregate
of 1,712,500 shares of Bank Plus common stock at a weighted average strike price
of $3.70 per share. For purposes of Sandler O'Neill's analyses, earnings per
share were based on fully diluted earnings per share. Sandler O'Neill noted that
the transaction value represented a 36.79% premium over the June 1, 2001 closing
price of Bank Plus common stock of $5.30.
Stock Trading History. Sandler O'Neill reviewed the history of the reported
trading prices and volume of Bank Plus' common stock and the relationship
between the movements in the prices of Bank Plus' common stock to movements in
certain stock indices, including the Standard & Poor's 500 Index, the NASDAQ
Bank Index and the median performance of a composite group of publicly traded
regional savings institutions
24
30
selected by Sandler O'Neill. During the one year period ended June 1, 2001, Bank
Plus' common stock outperformed the S&P 500, the Nasdaq Bank Index and the
regional group.
<Table>
<Caption>
BEGINNING INDEX VALUE ENDING INDEX VALUE
JUNE 4, 2000 JUNE 1, 2001
--------------------- ------------------
Bank Plus....................... 100.00% 184.35%
Regional Group.................. 100.00 152.91
Nasdaq Bank Index............... 100.00 124.17
S&P 500 Index................... 100.00 85.34
</Table>
During the three year period ended June 1, 2001, Bank Plus' common stock
under performed the indices to which it was compared.
<Table>
<Caption>
BEGINNING INDEX VALUE ENDING INDEX VALUE
JUNE 4, 1998 JUNE 1, 2001
--------------------- ------------------
Bank Plus....................... 100.00% 43.71%
Regional Group.................. 100.00 113.18
Nasdaq Bank Index............... 100.00 93.23
S&P 500 Index................... 100.00 115.15
</Table>
Comparable Company Analysis. Sandler O'Neill used publicly available
information to compare selected financial and market trading information for
Bank Plus and two groups of selected financial institutions. The first group
consisted of Bank Plus and the following nine publicly traded regional savings
institutions (the "Regional Group"):
<Table>
Westcorp Washington Federal Inc. FirstFed Financial Corp.
PFF Bancorp Inc. Sterling Financial Corp. Hawthorne Financial Corp.
ITLA Capital Corp. Quaker City Bancorp Inc. Provident Financial Holdings
</Table>
Sandler O'Neill also compared Bank Plus to a group of eleven publicly
traded savings institutions which had a return on average equity (based on last
twelve months' earnings) of greater than 14% and a price to tangible book value
of greater than 140% (the "High Performing Group"). The High Performing Group
was comprised of the following eleven institutions:
<Table>
Webster Financial Corp. Downey Financial Corp. Roslyn Bancorp Inc.
Flagstar Bancorp Inc. MAF Bancorp Inc. FirstFed Financial Corp.
Coastal Bancorp Inc. First Federal Capital Corp. First Financial Holdings Inc.
Andover Bancorp Inc. First Essex Bancorp Inc.
</Table>
The analysis compared publicly available financial information for Bank
Plus and the median data for each of the Regional Group and Highly Performing
Group as of and for each of the years ended December 31, 1996 through December
31, 2000 and as of and for the twelve months ended March 31, 2001. The table
below
25
31
sets forth the comparative data as of and for the twelve months ended March 31,
2001, with pricing data as of June 1, 2001.
<Table>
<Caption>
HIGH
REGIONAL PERFORMING
BANK PLUS GROUP GROUP
---------- ---------- ----------
Total assets................................... $2,192,604 $2,652,127 $4,517,296
Tangible equity/total assets................... 2.72% 7.57% 5.97%
Intangible assets/total equity................. 14.29% 0.61% 5.36%
Net loans/total assets......................... 73.01% 79.19% 75.57%
Gross loans/total deposits..................... 78.23% 127.59% 118.28%
Total borrowings/total assets.................. 2.35% 27.24% 31.31%
Non-performing assets/total assets............. 0.25% 0.51% 0.38%
Loan loss reserve/gross loans.................. 0.57% 1.34% 0.82%
Net interest margin............................ 2.65% 3.29% 2.78%
Non-interest income/average assets............. 0.83% 0.44% 0.49%
Non-interest expense/average assets............ 2.94% 1.91% 1.89%
Efficiency ratio............................... 88.23% 48.66% 52.41%
Return on average assets....................... 0.27% 0.98% 1.02%
Return on average equity....................... 9.59% 14.10% 15.44%
Price/tangible book value per share............ 172.52% 118.00% 188.92%
Price/earnings per share....................... 16.90x 10.10x 12.19x
Dividend yield................................. 0.00% 0.00% 2.06%
Dividend payout ratio.......................... 0.00% 0.00% 26.21%
</Table>
Analysis of Selected Merger Transactions. Sandler O'Neill reviewed 13 other
transactions announced nationwide from January 1, 2000 to June 1, 2001 involving
publicly traded savings institutions as acquired institutions with transaction
values greater than $100 million. Sandler O'Neill reviewed the multiples of
transaction value at announcement to last twelve months' earnings, transaction
value to projected earnings, transaction value to book value, transaction value
to tangible book value, tangible book premium to core deposits and premium to
market price and computed high, low and median multiples and premiums for these
transactions. These multiples were applied to Bank Plus' financial information
as of and for the last twelve months ended March 31, 2001. As illustrated in the
following table, Sandler O'Neill derived an imputed range of values per share of
Bank Plus' common stock of $2.00 to $5.94 based upon the low multiples, $4.59 to
$10.09 based upon the median multiples and $6.92 to $19.41 based upon the high
multiples.
<Table>
<Caption>
LOW IMPLIED MEDIAN IMPLIED HIGH IMPLIED
MULTIPLE VALUE MULTIPLE VALUE MULTIPLE VALUE
-------- ------- -------- ------- -------- -------
Deal price/LTM EPS(1).................... 11.31x $3.55 15.53x $4.87 25.66x $8.05
Deal price/projected EPS(2).............. 8.75x 2.92 13.76x 4.59 20.74x 6.92
Deal price/Book value.................... 81.19% 2.91 157.20% 5.63 231.21% 8.27
Deal price/Tang. Book value.............. 89.37% 2.74 158.28% 4.86 244.47% 7.50
Tang. Bk prem/core Deposits(3)........... (1.35)% 2.00 8.92% 10.09 20.76% 19.41
Premium to Market(4)..................... 12.02% 5.94 44.22% 7.64 64.38% 8.71
</Table>
- ---------------
(1) Based on $0.31 LTM EPS from continuing operations.
(2) Based on management expectations of $0.33 2001 EPS from continuing
operations.
(3) Assumes 75% of Bank Plus deposits are core deposits.
(4) Based on Bank Plus stock price of $5.30 as of market close on June 1, 2001.
Discounted Dividend Stream and Terminal Value Analysis. Sandler O'Neill
also performed an analysis which estimated the future stream of after-tax
dividend flows of Bank Plus through December 31, 2004 under various
circumstances, assuming Bank Plus' current dividend payout ratio and that Bank
Plus performed in
26
32
accordance with the earnings forecasts reviewed with management. To approximate
the terminal value of Bank Plus common stock at December 31, 2004, Sandler
O'Neill applied price/earnings multiples ranging from 9x to 19x and multiples of
tangible book value ranging from 100% to 250%. The dividend income streams and
terminal values were then discounted to present values using different discount
rates ranging from 9% to 15% chosen to reflect different assumptions regarding
required rates of return of holders or prospective buyers of Bank Plus common
stock. As illustrated in the following table, this analysis indicated an imputed
range of values per share of Bank Plus common stock of $3.88 to $10.01 when
applying the price/earnings multiples and $3.26 to $9.96 when applying multiples
of tangible book value.
<Table>
<Caption>
EARNINGS PER SHARE MULTIPLES TANGIBLE BOOK VALUE MULTIPLES
DISCOUNT ------------------------------ -----------------------------
RATE 9X 13X 15X 19X 100% 150% 175% 250%
- -------- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- -----
9% $4.74 $6.85 $7.90 $10.01 $3.99 $5.98 $6.97 $9.96
11 4.43 6.40 7.38 9.35 3.72 5.58 6.51 9.31
13 4.14 5.98 6.90 8.75 3.48 5.22 6.09 8.70
15 3.88 5.60 6.46 8.19 3.26 4.89 5.70 8.15
</Table>
In addition, assuming a discount rate of 11%, Sandler O'Neill applied
price/earnings multiples ranging from 9x to 19x to variations of Bank Plus'
earnings projections. As illustrated in the following table, this analysis
indicated an imputed range of values per share of Bank Plus common stock from
$3.32 to $11.69 when varying earnings projections 25% lower and higher than the
base case earnings projections.
<Table>
<Caption>
EARNINGS PER SHARE MULTIPLES
EPS -----------------------------
VARIATION 9X 13X 15X 19X
- --------- ----- ----- ----- -----
(25)% $3.32 $4.80 $5.54 $7.01
(10) 3.99 5.76 6.64 8.42
0 4.43 6.40 7.38 9.35
10 4.87 7.04 8.12 10.29
25 5.54 8.00 9.23 11.69
</Table>
Sandler O'Neill noted that the discounted dividend stream and terminal
value analysis is a widely used valuation methodology, but the results of such
methodology are highly dependent upon the numerous assumptions that must be
made, and the results thereof are not necessarily indicative of actual values or
future results.
Breakup Analysis. Sandler O'Neill calculated a low and high per share value
of Bank Plus based on the estimated values of its component assets and
liabilities. For purposes of this analysis, Sandler O'Neill assumed an aggregate
value equal to the tangible stockholder's equity of Bank Plus as of March 31,
2001, as adjusted to reflect an estimated range of values for net earnings
through September 30, 2001, transaction costs, premiums paid to retire existing
senior notes, deposit premiums, mark to market adjustments on the loan
portfolio, tax loss carryforwards, contingent liabilities and proceeds from the
assumed exercise of stock options. To derive a per share value, Sandler O'Neill
divided the aggregate adjusted value by an assumed number of fully diluted
shares of Bank Plus common stock outstanding, ranging from 19.9 million to 20.3
million. This analysis indicated an imputed range of values per share of Bank
Plus' common stock of $5.64 to $8.20.
Sandler O'Neill noted that the results of this analysis were highly
dependent on the numerous assumptions that must be made, and that the results
thereof were not necessarily indicative of actual values that might be achieved
in a sale or other disposition of any of the component assets or liabilities.
In connection with rendering the opinion included as an exhibit to this
proxy statement, Sandler O'Neill confirmed the appropriateness of its reliance
on the analyses used to render its June 2, 2001 opinion by performing procedures
to update certain of such analyses and by reviewing the assumptions upon which
such analyses were based and the other factors considered in rendering its
opinion.
Bank Plus has agreed to pay Sandler O'Neill a transaction fee of
approximately $1.47 million in connection with the merger, of which
approximately $147,277 has been paid with the balance payable upon closing of
the merger. Sandler O'Neill has also received a fee of $100,000 for rendering
its opinion, which will
27
33
be credited against that portion of the fee due upon the closing of the merger.
Bank Plus has also agreed to reimburse Sandler O'Neill for its reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with its engagement up to a
maximum of $25,000 and to indemnify Sandler O'Neill and its affiliates and their
respective partners, directors, officers, employees, agents, and controlling
persons against certain expenses and liabilities, including liabilities under
securities laws.
Since November 2, 2000, Sandler O'Neill has provided general investment
banking services to Bank Plus, for which it receives semi-annual retainer fees
of $50,000. Sandler O'Neill has in the past provided, and from time to time in
the future may provide, investment banking services to FBOP unrelated to the
merger, for which it received, or will receive, its customary compensation. In
addition, in the ordinary course of its business as a broker-dealer, Sandler
O'Neill may purchase securities from and sell securities to Bank Plus and FBOP
and may actively trade the debt and/or equity securities of Bank Plus and FBOP
and their respective affiliates for its own account and for the accounts of
customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in
such securities.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
In order for the merger to occur, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act,
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (to whom we refer in this
proxy statement as the "Federal Reserve Board") must approve the acquisition of
Bank Plus by FBOP, because as a result of the merger, FBOP, a registered bank
and savings institution holding company, will acquire control of Bank Plus, a
unitary savings and loan holding company, as well as Fidelity Federal Bank, FSB,
a federal savings bank. FBOP will file an application for such approvals. The
merger may not be consummated unless FBOP obtains these approvals. In addition,
there is a 30-day waiting period after the Federal Reserve Board approves the
transaction (which the Federal Reserve Board may, in its discretion, shorten to
15 days) before the merger can become effective.
Regulatory approval of an application means that it has satisfied the
statutory and regulatory standards required for such approval. It does not mean,
and should not be understood to imply, that the merger or the merger
consideration that will be paid to Bank Plus stockholders in the merger is
necessarily fair to them from a financial standpoint.
Gateway, our subsidiary, is a member of the National Association of
Securities Dealers (to whom we refer in this proxy statement as the "NASD") and
is subject to the rules of the NASD. Pursuant to NASD Rule 1017, Gateway is
required to file an application for approval of change of ownership with the
NASD at least 30 days prior to the consummation of any transaction that would
result in the direct or indirect acquisition of Gateway. However, the merger may
be consummated prior to the conclusion of the NASD approval proceeding. Gateway
will file this application with the NASD prior to the closing.
It is a condition to FBOP's obligations to consummate the merger that all
requisite regulatory approvals are obtained and all such approvals not contain
conditions that could lead to a material adverse effect on FBOP or Bank Plus.
See "Merger Agreement -- Conditions to the Merger" beginning on page 33.
CAPITAL REQUIRED FOR THE MERGER
FBOP anticipates funding the acquisition out of existing capital and
operating earnings and through the issuance of additional securities.
TERMINATION OF REGISTRATION
Current Bank Plus stockholders will not have an opportunity to continue
their equity interest in Bank Plus after the merger. Upon completion of the
merger, our common stock will no longer be quoted on the Nasdaq National Market,
trading information will no longer be available and the registration of our
common stock under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (to which we
refer in this proxy as the "Exchange Act"), will be terminated.
28
34
APPRAISAL RIGHTS
Under Delaware law, if you do not wish to accept the cash payment provided
for in the merger agreement, you have the right to dissent from the merger and
to have an appraisal of the fair value of your shares conducted by the Delaware
Court of Chancery. If you elect to exercise your dissenters' appraisal rights,
you must strictly comply with the provisions of Section 262 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law in order to perfect your rights.
The following is intended as a brief summary of the material provisions of
the Delaware statutory procedures you must follow in order to perfect your
dissenters' appraisal rights. This summary, however, is not a complete statement
of all applicable requirements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. If you wish to consider
exercising your dissenters' appraisal rights, you should carefully review the
text of Section 262 contained in Annex C, because if you do not timely and
properly comply with the requirements of Section 262, you will lose your rights
under Delaware law.
Section 262 requires that we notify our stockholders at least 20 days
before the date of the meeting to vote on the merger agreement. We must include
a copy of Section 262 with that notice. This proxy statement constitutes our
notice to you that you have dissenters' appraisal rights in connection with the
merger.
If you elect to demand appraisal of your shares of Bank Plus common stock,
you must satisfy ALL of the following conditions:
1. You must deliver to us a written demand for appraisal of your
shares of common stock before the vote with respect to the merger agreement
is taken. This written demand for appraisal must be in addition to and
separate from any proxy or vote abstaining from or against the merger
agreement. Voting against or failing to vote for the merger by itself does
not constitute a demand for appraisal within the meaning of Section 262.
2. You must not vote in favor of the approval of the merger agreement.
An abstention or failure to vote will satisfy this requirement, but a vote
in favor of the approval of the merger agreement, by proxy or in person,
will constitute a waiver of your dissenters' appraisal rights in respect of
the shares of common stock so voted and will nullify any previously filed
written demands for appraisal.
3. You must continuously hold your shares of Bank Plus common stock
through the effective time of the merger.
If you fail to comply with all of these conditions and the merger is
completed, you will be entitled to receive the cash payment for your shares of
Bank Plus common stock as provided for in the merger agreement, but will have no
dissenters' appraisal rights with respect to your shares of common stock.
All demands for appraisal must reasonably inform us of your identity and
your intention to demand appraisal of your shares of common stock. The demand
should be executed by, or on behalf of, the record holder of the shares of
common stock and must be delivered to the following address prior to the time
that the vote on the merger is taken at the meeting:
Corporate Secretary
Bank Plus Corporation
4565 Colorado Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90039
To be effective, a demand for appraisal must be made by or in the name of
such registered stockholder, fully and correctly, as the stockholder's name
appears on his or her stock certificate(s) and cannot be made by the beneficial
owner if he or she does not also hold the shares of record. The beneficial
holder must, in such cases, have the registered owner submit the required demand
in respect of such shares.
If shares of common stock are owned of record in a fiduciary capacity, such
as by a trustee, guardian or custodian, execution of a demand for appraisal
should be made in that capacity; and if the shares of common stock are owned of
record by more than one person, as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in common, the
demand should be executed by or for all joint owners. An authorized agent,
including one for two or more joint owners,
29
35
may execute the demand for appraisal for a stockholder of record; however, the
agent must identify the record owner or owners and expressly disclose the fact
that, in executing the demand, he or she is acting as agent for the record
owner. A record owner, such as a broker, who holds shares of common stock as a
nominee for others, may exercise his or her right of appraisal with respect to
the shares of common stock held for one or more beneficial owners, while not
exercising this right for other beneficial owners. In that case, the written
demand should state the number of shares of common stock as to which appraisal
is sought. Where no number of shares of common stock is expressly mentioned, the
demand will be presumed to cover all shares of common stock held in the name of
such record owner.
If you hold your shares of common stock in a brokerage account or in other
nominee form and you wish to exercise appraisal rights, you should consult with
your broker or other nominee to determine the appropriate procedures for making
a demand for appraisal by such nominee.
Section 262 provides that within 10 days after the effective date of the
merger, FBOP must give written notice that the merger has become effective to
each Bank Plus stockholder who has properly filed a written demand for appraisal
and who did not vote in favor of the merger. Within 120 days after the effective
date of the merger, either FBOP or any stockholder who has complied with the
requirements of Section 262 may file a petition in the Delaware Court of
Chancery demanding a determination of the fair value of the shares held by all
stockholders entitled to appraisal. FBOP has advised us that it does not
presently intend to file such a petition in the event there are dissenting
stockholders and has no obligation to do so. Accordingly, your failure to file
such a petition within the period specified could nullify your previously
written demand for appraisal.
At any time within 60 days after the effective date of the merger, any
stockholder who has demanded an appraisal has the right to withdraw the demand
and to accept the cash payment specified by the merger agreement for his or her
shares of Bank Plus common stock. If you duly file a petition for appraisal and
if a copy of the petition is delivered to FBOP, FBOP will be obligated, within
20 days after receiving service of a copy of the petition, to provide the
Chancery Court with a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of
all stockholders who have demanded an appraisal of their shares of common stock.
After notice to dissenting stockholders, the Chancery Court is empowered to
conduct a hearing upon the petition to determine those stockholders who have
complied with Section 262 and who have become entitled to the appraisal rights.
The Chancery Court may require the stockholders who have demanded payment for
their shares to submit their stock certificates to the Register in Chancery for
notation on them of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any
stockholder fails to comply with this direction, the Court may dismiss the
proceedings as to such stockholder.
After determination of the stockholders entitled to appraisal of their
shares of Bank Plus common stock, the Chancery Court will appraise the shares,
determining their fair value exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the merger, together with a fair rate of
interest. When the value is determined, the Chancery Court will direct the
payment of this fair value, with interest accrued during the pendency of the
proceeding if the Chancery Court so determines, to the stockholders entitled to
receive the same, upon surrender by such holders of the certificates
representing such shares.
In determining fair value, the Chancery Court is required to take into
account all relevant factors. You should be aware that the fair value of the
shares of common stock as determined under Section 262 could be more, the same,
or less than the value that you are entitled to receive pursuant to the merger
agreement.
Costs of the appraisal proceeding may be imposed upon FBOP and the
stockholders participating in the appraisal proceeding by the Chancery Court, as
the Chancery Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon the application of
a stockholder, the Chancery Court may order all or a portion of the expenses
incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding,
including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and the fees and
expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all shares of
common stock entitled to appraisal.
After the effective date of the merger, if you have demanded appraisal
rights, you will not be entitled to vote your shares of common stock subject to
such demand for any purpose, or to receive payments of dividends or any other
distribution with respect to such shares of common stock, other than with
respect to payment as
30
36
of a record date prior to the effective date of the merger. However, if you do
not file a petition for appraisal within 120 days after the effective date of
the merger, or if you deliver a written withdrawal your demand for appraisal and
an acceptance of the merger within 60 days after the effective date of the
merger, then your right to appraisal will cease and you will be entitled to
receive the cash payment your shares of common stock pursuant to the merger
agreement. Any withdrawal of a demand for appraisal made more than 60 days after
the effective date of the merger may only be made with the written approval of
FBOP and must, to be effective, be made within 120 days after the effective date
of the merger.
The requirements of Section 262 are technical and complex. If you wish to
dissent from the merger and pursue your appraisal rights, you should consult
your legal advisers.
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following discussion is a general summary of the material United States
federal income tax consequences of the merger. This discussion is based upon the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (to which we refer in this proxy
statement as the "Code"), final and temporary regulations promulgated by the
United States Treasury Department, judicial authorities, and current rulings and
administrative practice of the Internal Revenue Service, as currently in effect,
all of which are subject to change at any time, possibly with retroactive
effect. This discussion assumes that our common stock is held as a capital asset
by each holder and does not address all aspects of federal income taxation that
might be relevant to particular holders of our common stock in light of their
status or personal investment circumstances, such as foreign persons, dealers in
securities, regulated investment companies, life insurance companies, other
financial institutions, tax-exempt organizations, pass-through entities,
taxpayers who hold our common stock as part of a "straddle," "hedge" or
"conversion transaction" or who have a "functional currency" other than the
United States dollar or persons who have received our common stock as
compensation or otherwise in connection with the performance of services of
individuals. Further, this discussion does not address the state, local or
foreign tax consequences of the merger.
For United States federal income tax purposes, the merger of Acquisition
Sub with and into Bank Plus will be treated as an acquisition by FBOP of all the
outstanding stock of Bank Plus. Each holder of shares of our common stock will
be treated as exchanging such shares for cash.
The receipt of the cash payment by holders of our common stock will be a
taxable transaction for federal income tax purposes. Each holder's gain or loss
per share will be equal to the difference between the per share cash
consideration and the holder's adjusted tax basis per share in our common stock.
A holder's gain or loss from the exchange will be a capital gain or loss. This
gain or loss will be long-term if the holder has held our common stock for more
than twelve months prior to the merger. Under current law, net long-term capital
gains of individuals are subject to a maximum federal income tax rate of 20%
(not taking into account any phase-out of tax benefits such as personal
exemptions and certain itemized deductions) whereas the maximum federal income
tax rate on ordinary income and net short-term capital gains (i.e., gain on
capital assets held for not more than twelve months) of an individual is
currently 39.1% (not taking into account any phase-out of tax benefits such as
personal exemptions and certain itemized deductions). For corporations, capital
gains and ordinary income are taxed at the same maximum rate of 35%. Capital
losses are currently deductible only to the extent of capital gains plus, in the
case of taxpayers other than corporations, $3,000 of ordinary income ($1,500 in
the case of married individuals filing separate returns). In the case of
individuals and other non-corporate taxpayers, capital losses that are not
currently deductible may be carried forward to other years, subject to certain
limitations. In the case of corporations, capital losses that are not currently
deductible may generally be carried back to each of the three years preceding
the loss year and forward to each of the five years succeeding the loss year,
subject to certain limitations.
A holder of our common stock may be subject to backup withholding at the
rate of 31% with respect to payments of cash consideration received pursuant to
the merger, unless the holder (a) provides a correct taxpayer identification
number (to which we refer in this proxy statement as a "TIN") in the manner
required or (b) is a corporation or other exempt recipient and, when required,
demonstrates this fact. To prevent the possibility of backup federal income tax
withholding, each holder must provide the disbursing agent with his or
31
37
her correct TIN by completing a Form W-9 or Substitute Form W-9. A holder of our
common stock who does not provide American Stock Transfer with his or her
correct TIN may be subject to penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Service,
as well as backup withholding. Any amount withheld will be creditable against
the holder's federal income tax liability. Bank Plus (or its agent) will report
to the holders of our common stock and the Internal Revenue Service the amount
of any "reportable payments," as defined in Section 3406 of the Code, and the
amount of tax, if any, withheld with respect thereto.
The foregoing discussion is for general information only and is not a
complete description of all of the potential tax consequences that may occur as
a result of the merger. You should therefore consult your tax advisors regarding
the federal tax consequences of the merger, as well as the tax consequences
arising under the laws of any state, local or other jurisdiction of the above
described transactions.
32
38
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The following is a brief description of material terms of the merger
agreement. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the merger
agreement itself, a copy of which is attached as Annex A. You should refer to
the full text of the merger agreement for details about the terms and conditions
of the merger.
TERMS OF THE MERGER
The merger agreement provides for a business combination in which
Acquisition Sub, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FBOP, will be merged into Bank
Plus. This transaction will result in Bank Plus becoming a wholly-owned
subsidiary of FBOP.
The directors and officers of Acquisition Sub before it is merged into Bank
Plus will be the directors and officers of Bank Plus after the merger.
As a result of the merger, except as provided below, each share of Bank
Plus common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time
of the merger will be automatically converted into the right to receive cash in
the amount of $7.25, subject to adjustment. If the merger is completed after
December 31, 2001, FBOP will increase the per share merger consideration by
paying interest on the merger consideration at the prime rate for the period
from January 1, 2002 to the closing date. Holders of common stock for which
dissenters' appraisal rights have been properly exercised will be entitled only
to the rights granted by Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
Each outstanding and unexercised option granted under the Bank Plus Stock
Option and Equity Incentive Plan that has not expired immediately prior to the
effective time of the merger, whether or not it is vested, will be converted
into the right to receive a cash payment equal to the positive difference, if
any, of (a) the number of shares of common stock subject to the option
multiplied by the per share merger consideration minus (b) the aggregate
exercise price of such option.
WHEN THE MERGER WILL BE COMPLETED
The closing of the merger will take place not more than 5 business days
after the expiration of all applicable waiting periods in connection with
required regulatory approvals and the satisfaction or waiver of all other
conditions to the merger agreement, unless FBOP and Bank Plus agree to another
date. On the date of the closing, a Certificate of Merger will be filed with the
Delaware Secretary of State. The merger will become effective at the time stated
in the Certificate of Merger.
We currently expect to complete the merger in the 4th quarter of 2001.
However, we cannot guarantee when or if the required approvals will be obtained.
Furthermore, in general, either party may terminate the merger agreement if,
among other reasons, the merger has not been completed on or before December 31,
2001. However, if failure to complete the merger by that date is due to FBOP's
inability to obtain requisite regulatory approval and FBOP is not otherwise in
breach of the merger agreement, the term of the agreement will automatically be
extended to March 31, 2002, or in certain cases, upon FBOP's option, to as late
as June 30, 2002. See the caption entitled "The Merger Agreement -- Expenses and
Termination Fee" beginning on page 38 for more information.
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
The obligations of FBOP and Bank Plus to complete the merger are
conditioned on the following:
- approval of the merger agreement by the stockholders of Bank Plus;
- receipt of all required regulatory approvals, consents and waivers and
the expiration of all applicable waiting periods;
- no party in the merger being subject to any order, decree or injunction
that enjoins or prohibits the consummation of the merger and no
litigation or proceeding pending for the purpose of blocking the merger;
33
39
- absence of any statute, rule, regulation, injunction or decree that
prohibits or restricts the completion of the merger or would cause either
party to suffer a material adverse effect as the result of the merger;
- absence of any pending material proceedings initiated by the Securities
and Exchange Commission (to whom we refer in this proxy statement as the
"SEC") relating to the proxy statement;
- the other party having performed in all material respects its obligations
under the merger agreement and the other party's representations and
warranties being true and correct as of the date of the merger agreement
and as of the closing date, each except where the failure to perform or
the failure of the representations and warranties to be true and correct
would not have a material adverse effect on the other party.
The obligation of FBOP to complete the merger is also conditioned on:
- Bank Plus having obtained in all material respects, such consents of
third parties as may be necessary to permit the merger, except where the
failure to obtain such consents would not have a material adverse effect
on Bank Plus;
- absence of any conditions imposed by any necessary regulatory approvals
or consents that would be applicable to FBOP and would cause a material
adverse effect upon either Bank Plus or FBOP upon the consummation of the
merger;
- Bank Plus terminating its Amended and Restated Rights Agreement and
neither Buyer, nor Acquisition Sub having been determined to be an
"Acquiring Person" under that Rights Agreement; and
- absence of any material adverse effect on Bank Plus prior to the
effective date of the merger.
In addition, the obligation of Bank Plus to complete the merger is
conditioned on:
- Bank Plus having received, within five days prior to the mailing of this
proxy statement, a fairness opinion from Sandler O'Neill confirming that
the consideration paid to Bank Plus in the merger is fair from a
financial point of view to the stockholders;
- absence of any event that has had or could reasonably be expected to have
a material adverse effect on FBOP prior to the effective date of the
merger; and
- FBOP's deposit of all merger consideration to the Paying Agent.
We cannot guarantee that all of the conditions to the merger will be
satisfied or waived by the party permitted to do so. The parties may terminate
the merger agreement under certain limited circumstances described under the
caption "The Merger Agreement -- Termination of the Merger Agreement" beginning
on page 38.
CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGER
Bank Plus has agreed that, until the completion of the merger, except as
otherwise provided in the merger agreement, each of Bank Plus and its
subsidiaries will:
- conduct its business and maintain its books and records in the usual,
regular and ordinary course, consistent with prudent banking practice,
applicable law and any orders or directives that have been issued by the
Office of Thrift Supervision;
- use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain and preserve intact its
business organization, business relationships and goodwill with account
holders, borrowers, employees and others that have business relationships
with Bank Plus or its subsidiaries;
- use commercially reasonable efforts to keep in full force and effect all
of its material permits and licenses;
- use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain its insurance coverage;
34
40
- perform its obligations under its material contracts and not become in
material default on any such obligations;
- maintain its assets and properties in good condition and repair, except
for normal wear and tear and for changes in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice;
- promptly notify FBOP of any notification by a tax authority of a
commencement of an audit or certain other tax related matters; and
- make available to FBOP monthly unaudited consolidated balance sheets and
consolidated income statements of Bank Plus within 25 days after the
close of each calendar month.
Further, except as otherwise provided in the merger agreement, until the
completion of the merger, Bank Plus has agreed that, without the written consent
of FBOP (which consent will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed), neither
Bank Plus nor any of its subsidiaries will:
- incur any indebtedness or material obligation or cancel, release or
assign any material indebtedness of anyone, unless in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice or except as set forth in the
merger agreement;
- dispose of any of its material assets or leases or make any capital
expenditure, except as set forth in the merger agreement;
- make any changes to the capital stock of Bank Plus and its subsidiaries,
including options to acquire capital stock, encumber or dispose of the
capital stock of Bank Plus and its subsidiaries, or declare or pay
dividends, except as set forth in the merger agreement;
- make any changes to any compensation or employment arrangements with
directors, officers or employees, except as set forth in the merger
agreement;
- make any investment in equities or assets, or merge or consolidate with
any third party, other than in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice, except as provided in the merger agreement;
- enter into, renew, terminate or materially change any material contract
or agreement, except as provided in the merger agreement;
- make, renegotiate, renew, increase, extend or purchase any loan, lease,
advance, credit enhancement or other extension of credit, including
extensions of credit to executive officers, directors or holders of 10%
or more of the outstanding common stock of Bank Plus (or any affiliate of
such person), or make any commitment in respect of any of the foregoing,
except as provided in the merger agreement;
- change any basic policies and practices of Bank Plus or Fidelity in any
material respect, including changes in its method of accounting, except
as provided in the merger agreement;
- change any material aspect of the business or operations of Bank Plus,
including entering into any new lines of business or ceasing to conduct
any material lines of business, except as provided in the merger
agreement;
- settle any claim, action or proceeding involving any liability of Bank
Plus or its subsidiaries or involving material restrictions upon the
business or operations of Bank Plus or its subsidiaries, except as
provided in the merger agreement. The merger agreement provides that a
material adverse effect will not have occurred as a result of any
settlement payments or judgments aggregating up to $5 million resulting
from the litigation or arbitration matters identified as "Significant
Matters" in the merger agreement;
- amend its charter, bylaws or other similar governing documents;
- grant anyone a power of attorney or similar authority, other than in the
ordinary course of business;
- take title to any non-residential real property without obtaining a prior
Phase I environmental report;
- execute certain tax documents;
35
41
- make application for the opening, relocation or closing of any, or open,
relocate or close any branches, except as provided in the merger
agreement;
- agree to, or make any commitment to, take any of the actions listed
above.
FBOP has agreed that as provided in the merger agreement, prior to the
completion of the merger, it will:
- promptly form Acquisition Sub as a Delaware corporation and qualify it in
any other jurisdiction in which qualification is necessary or advisable
to consummate the merger and to cause it to become a party thereto;
- cause Acquisition Sub to take all action necessary or appropriate to
effect or facilitate the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement;
- other than as required by applicable law, refrain from taking any action
reasonably expected to adversely affect or delay the ability of any party
to obtain any necessary governmental approvals, consents or waivers
required in the merger agreement, or to perform its covenants or
agreements on a timely basis under the merger agreement; and
- not agree to, or make any commitment to, take any of the actions listed
above.
See Article III of the merger agreement, which is attached to this proxy
statement as Annex A, for a more complete account of the restrictions on the
conduct of business of FBOP and Bank Plus pending the merger.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
Both Bank Plus and FBOP have made certain customary representations and
warranties to each other in the merger agreement relating to their businesses.
For information on these representations and warranties, please refer to Article
IV of the merger agreement attached as Annex A. The representations and
warranties must be true and correct as of the date of the merger agreement and
as of the date of the completion of the merger, except where a breach of a
representation or warranty does not have a material adverse effect on the party
making such representation or warranty.
COVENANTS OF BANK PLUS AND FBOP IN THE MERGER AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT NOT TO SOLICIT OTHER OFFERS
The merger agreement prohibits Bank Plus directly or indirectly, from:
- encouraging, soliciting, initiating or facilitating any acquisition
proposal; or
- entering into any agreements or participating in any way in discussions
or negotiations with respect to any acquisition proposal with a third
party. Acquisition proposal means any offer or proposal concerning any
merger, consolidation or similar transaction involving, or any purchase
of all or significant portion of the assets, deposits or any equity
security of, Bank Plus or any of its subsidiaries, except as contemplated
by the merger agreement.
However, if the board of directors of Bank Plus determines that it is
required to do so, because of its fiduciary duties to its stockholders, or by
any regulatory authority, Bank Plus may, in response to an acquisition proposal
that meets the requirements of the merger agreement, furnish information with
respect to Bank Plus and its subsidiaries pursuant to a customary
confidentiality agreement as described in the merger agreement, and participate
in discussions with respect to such acquisition proposal. Upon the presentation
of such acquisition proposal, Bank Plus will promptly notify FBOP of such
proposal and its terms.
EMPLOYEE MATTERS
FBOP and Fidelity will provide each person who is an employee of Bank Plus
or its subsidiaries whose employment is retained by FBOP or Fidelity after the
closing of the merger with benefits under the benefit and severance plans of
FBOP on substantially the same basis as other similarly situated employees of
FBOP. Each
36
42
of such retained employees of Bank Plus or its subsidiaries will be eligible to
participate immediately in such plans as specified in the merger agreement.
Bank Plus will take any action necessary or reasonably requested by FBOP to
terminate any plans maintained by it or on its behalf that cover employees and
directors of Bank Plus, except for the Bank Plus 401(k) plan which will be
merged with FBOP's 401(k) plan as contemplated by the merger agreement. With
respect to employees with a satisfactory work record not covered by an
employment agreement or a change-in-control agreement and who are terminated
without cause within 6 months after the closing of the merger, FBOP will provide
benefits under the related Bank Plus severance programs as more fully set forth
in the merger agreement; provided, however, that FBOP may elect to provide any
or all such employees with a cash payment in an amount sufficient to allow such
employees to purchase equivalent benefits themselves.
Following the merger, FBOP will expressly assume any obligations of Bank
Plus and its subsidiaries under the employment, change-in-control and other
agreements listed in the disclosure schedules to the merger agreement, upon the
terms and with such possible alternatives as set forth in the merger agreement.
At the closing of the merger, Bank Plus will have delivered to FBOP the
resignations of the members of the boards of directors of Bank Plus, Fidelity
and their subsidiaries. Also, Mark Mason, Godfrey Evans, James Stutz, John
Michel and Ronald Stoffers will be terminated after the closing of the merger
agreement. For purposes of any employment agreement, severance,
change-in-control or similar agreement of Bank Plus, any such termination will
be considered termination without cause after a change of control.
INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
FBOP has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless each current and former
director and officer of Bank Plus and its subsidiaries against liability and
expenses arising out of matters existing or acts occurring at or before the
consummation of the merger to the extent allowed under applicable law. For six
years after the closing of the merger, FBOP will maintain Bank Plus' current
directors' and officers' insurance and indemnification policy.
CERTAIN OTHER COVENANTS
The merger agreement also contains other agreements relating to the conduct
of the parties before consummation of the merger, including the following:
- FBOP and Bank Plus will each promptly furnish to the other any
information and provide access to the other as required by the merger
agreement.
- No press release or other public disclosure of matters relating to the
merger will be made by either party without the prior consent of the
other party.
- Bank Plus will take all actions necessary to convene a meeting of its
stockholders to vote on the merger agreement. The Bank Plus board will
recommend at its stockholder meeting that the stockholders vote to
approve the merger agreement.
- FBOP and Bank Plus will each notify the other of any contract defaults or
other events which would be likely to result in a material breach of its
obligations under the merger agreement.
- Bank Plus will notify FBOP of any regulatory examination review and any
preliminary and final results of such examination review.
- FBOP and Bank Plus each agreed that all information furnished by it or
any of its subsidiaries for filing with regulatory authorities, will
comply in all material respects to relevant provisions of applicable law
and will not contain any untrue statements or omissions of material fact.
See Article V of the merger agreement, which is attached to this proxy
statement as Annex A, for a more complete account of the covenants made by each
party in connection with the consummation of the merger.
37
43
TERMINATION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The merger agreement may be terminated prior to the completion of the
merger, either before or after requisite stockholder approval, by:
- the mutual consent of Bank Plus and FBOP in writing, if a majority of the
board of directors of each so determines;
- either party by written notice to the other if a required regulatory
approval is denied or any government entity prohibits the merger or the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;
- either party if any approval of the stockholders required for the
consummation of the merger has not been obtained;
- Bank Plus if its board of directors determines to accept a superior offer
from a third party in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement;
- either party if the other party makes a material misrepresentation,
materially breaches a warranty or fails to fulfill a covenant that is not
cured within a specified time, except where such misrepresentation,
breach or failure would not have a material adverse effect;
- either party if a majority of its board of directors so determines, in
the event that it becomes apparent that a condition to such party's
obligation will not be satisfied, unless the failure to satisfy such
condition is due to a breach by the party seeking to terminate; or
- either party in the event that the merger is not consummated by December
31, 2001, unless FBOP has not obtained all requisite regulatory approvals
but is not otherwise in breach of the merger agreement, in which case,
the merger agreement will be automatically extended to March 31, 2002.
Under certain circumstances, FBOP may further extend such termination
date for the period of time, and upon deposit of additional money, as
specified in the merger agreement.
EXPENSES AND TERMINATION FEE
Except as otherwise specifically provided in the merger agreement, each
party will pay its own costs and expenses incurred in connection with the
merger.
In general, if either party breaches the merger agreement, the
non-breaching party's sole remedy is to terminate the merger agreement (assuming
such breach would otherwise allow the party to terminate the agreement) and
receive from the breaching party all of its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in connection with the proposed transactions since March 1, 2001. Such
expenses must be paid within ten days of the termination of the merger agreement
and are limited to a maximum of $1,500,000. However, there is no limitation on
the liability of a party in the case of that party's willful breach, of the
merger agreement, and there is no limit on FBOP's liability for damages if FBOP
breaches its covenant to have adequate funds and sufficient regulatory capital
to consummate the merger.
Bank Plus will pay to FBOP $5,000,000 if the merger agreement is terminated
in connection with the acceptance, announcement or signing of a superior
proposal. This termination fee will be paid to FBOP in cash not later than 5
business days after Bank Plus enters into an agreement with respect to such
superior proposal. However, if Bank Plus determines, in its reasonable
discretion, that payment of the full amount of this termination fee in cash
would be likely to reduce Fidelity's capital for regulatory purposes to a level
that would not provide a reasonable cushion above the amount necessary to remain
"well capitalized" under OTS regulations, then it has the option to pay some or
all of the termination fee in shares of outstanding preferred stock of Fidelity
currently held by Bank Plus. Any payment in the form of preferred stock would be
paid to FBOP no later than 20 business days after the termination of the merger
agreement in connection with Bank Plus' acceptance of a superior proposal.
In connection with the execution of the merger agreement, FBOP deposited
$5,000,000 into an escrow account pursuant to an escrow agreement by and among
FBOP, Bank Plus and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
38
44
the escrow agent. If the term of the merger agreement has been automatically
extended to March 31, 2002, FBOP has an option to extend the termination date
for up to three additional one-month periods if regulatory approval still hasn't
been obtained by March 31, 2002 and if FBOP is still not otherwise in breach of
the merger agreement. As a condition to extending the term of the merger
agreement, FBOP must deposit an additional $1,000,000 into the escrow account
for each such one-month extension. If the merger is completed, the escrowed
funds will be used as part of the total merger consideration. If the merger
agreement is terminated as the result of FBOP's failure to obtain regulatory
approval, then the escrow funds, including interest accrued and earnings
thereon, will be distributed to Bank Plus.
CHANGING THE TERMS OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT
Before the completion of the merger, Bank Plus and FBOP may agree in
writing to amend or modify any provision of the merger agreement, and any
provision of the merger agreement may be waived by the party benefited by the
provision. However, after the vote by the stockholders of Bank Plus, no
amendment may be made that would contravene any provisions of the Home Owners
Loan Act of 1933, as amended, or any applicable law.
39
45
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER
In considering the merger, you should be aware that our directors, officers
and certain members of management have interests in the merger in addition to
their interests solely as stockholders of the Bank Plus, as described below.
INDEMNIFICATION
The merger agreement provides that our officers and directors will have
rights to indemnification for all acts or omissions occurring prior to the
merger to the extent currently available under our certificate of incorporation
and by-laws. For six years after the merger, FBOP will provide officers' and
directors' liability insurance to such persons for acts and omissions occurring
before the merger. The SEC advises that indemnification for securities law
violations is against public policy and may be unenforceable.
INTERESTS OF OUR OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS IN THE MERGER
The following table describes the interests in the merger of each person
who is or has been a director or executive officer of Bank Plus at any time
since January 1, 2000. The table omits interests arising from the ownership of
our securities where the security holder will receive no extra or special
benefit not shared on a pro rata basis by all other holders of the same class.
All information in this table assumes that the per share merger consideration is
$7.25 and that the merger is closed on or prior to December 31, 2001.
<Table>
<Caption>
COMPENSATION TO BE RECEIVED AT CLOSING
OF THE MERGER IN RESPECT OF BONUS TO BE
-------------------------------------- EARNED IN
DEFERRED CHANGE OF RESPECT OF
STOCK CONTROL THE
NAME POSITION OPTIONS(1) UNITS(2) BENEFITS(3) MERGER(4)
---- -------- ----------- --------- ------------ -----------
Norman Barker, Jr. ............ Director $ 19,141 $109,185 $ 135,600 --
Irving R. Beimler.............. Director 19,141 309,626 -- --
Steven M. Ellis................ Director 13,125 113,840 -- --
Victor H. Indiek............... Director 19,141 346,992 -- --
Thomas E. King................. Director 13,125 145,972 -- --
Robert W. Medearis............. Director 19,141 356,512 -- --
Gordon V. Smith................ Director 19,141 780,028 -- --
Jeffrey E. Susskind............ Director 13,125 128,688 -- --
Mark K. Mason.................. Vice Chairman, President
and CEO of Bank Plus,
Chairman and CEO of
Fidelity 1,993,750 -- 3,090,681 $450,200
James E. Stutz................. Director of Fidelity,
President and COO of
Fidelity 1,062,500 -- 2,245,970 288,800
Godfrey B. Evans............... EVP, CAO and General
Counsel of Bank Plus and
Fidelity 859,375 -- 1,325,776 230,000
John M. Michel................. EVP and CFO of Bank Plus
and Fidelity 859,375 -- 1,173,096 200,000
Ronald A. Stoffers............. EVP and CCO of Fidelity 200,000 -- 616,262 170,000
</Table>
- ---------------
(1) Upon consummation of the merger, all outstanding options, regardless of
vesting, will be settled in cash for an amount equal to the product of the
number of shares included in the option times the positive difference, if
any, between the respective exercise price and the per share merger
consideration. The information in this table does not give effect to the
2,500 options that will be granted, on the date of the annual meeting, to
each non-employee director pursuant to the Bank Plus' Stock Option and
Equity Incentive Plan. See the discussion under the caption "Executive
Compensation -- Director Compensation" beginning on page 52 for more
information.
40
46
(2) Non-employee directors receive their annual retainers and meeting fees in
the form of grants of deferred stock units based on the market value of Bank
Plus' stock on the day the fees are earned. These units are settled in cash
upon the director's resignation or retirement from the board, based on the
market value of Bank Plus' common stock on the date of resignation or
retirement. See the discussion under the caption "Executive
Compensation -- Director Compensation" beginning on page 52 for more
information. Upon consummation of the merger, all directors will resign, and
their deferred stock units will be paid based on the per share merger
consideration. The information disclosed here takes into consideration all
annual retainers and meeting fees earned through July 31, 2001. The
additional amounts to be paid with regards to fees earned from July 31, 2001
until the consummation of the merger will be dependent on the amount of fees
earned and changes in the market price of Bank Plus' common stock.
(3) Change in control benefits for each non-employee director represents the
lump sum benefit payable following a change in control under the
Non-Employee Director Retirement Plan, to directors that are vested in that
plan. See the discussion under the caption "Executive
Compensation -- Director Compensation" beginning on page 52 for more
information. Change in control benefits disclosed for each executive officer
are based on an estimate of the amount that will be payable under the
respective employment contract and assumes that the officer's employment is
terminated concurrently with the closing of the merger. If the merger closes
in 2002, these amounts will be subject to increase or decrease as a
consequence of annual bonuses paid for 2001, which will then be used in the
computation of change of control benefits. See below under "Executive
Compensation -- Employment Contracts with Executive Officers; Termination of
Employment and Change of Control Arrangements" beginning on page 50 for more
information. These amounts also include the contractual entitlement to
gross-up for excise taxes assessed under income tax rules pertaining to
"excess parachute payments" which are estimated to be $1.6 million for Mr.
Mason, $1.1 million for Mr. Stutz, $0.7 million for Mr. Evans, $0.6 million
for Mr. Michel and $0.3 million for Mr. Stoffers.
(4) These amounts represent bonuses to be paid to the executive officers upon
the consummation of the merger under their employment contracts. See the
discussion under the caption "Executive Compensation -- Employment Contracts
with Executive Officers; Termination of Employment and Change of Control
Arrangements" beginning on page 50 for more information. The executive
officers would be entitled to this bonus even if the merger is consummated
after December 31, 2001. If the merger were consummated after December 31,
2001, the bonus amounts included in this schedule would be reduced by the
amount of any 2001 bonuses paid prior to the consummation of the merger.
In addition to "change of control" benefits, the employment agreements
provide that the employee's medical benefits will continue for a certain
period after termination following a change in control.
FEES PAYABLE TO OUR FINANCIAL ADVISOR
Contingent upon consummation of the merger, we have agreed to pay an
aggregate transaction fee of equal to 1% of the aggregate consideration payable
to Sandler O'Neill. Assuming a per share consideration of $7.25, this fee will
be $1,472,770. As of July 31, 2001, we have paid Sandler O'Neill $247,277 of
this fee. In addition, we have agreed to pay Sandler O'Neill a $50,000 retainer
fee every six months, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
connection with rendering financial advisory services. We have agreed to
indemnify Sandler O'Neill and its respective directors, officers, agents,
employees and controlling persons, for certain costs, expenses, losses, claims,
damages and liabilities related to or arising out of their rendering of services
under their engagement as financial advisors. See "The Proposed
Merger -- Opinion of Our Financial Advisor" beginning on page 22 for more
information.
41
47
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At the annual meeting, you will be asked to vote on the election of three
directors to our board. The three nominees receiving the highest number of votes
at the annual meeting will be elected directors. To fill these three board
positions, the enclosed proxy, unless indicated to the contrary, will be voted
FOR the nominees listed below and on the enclosed proxy card.
Set forth below are the names of the persons nominated by the board of
directors for election as directors at the annual meeting. Your proxy, unless
otherwise indicated, will be voted FOR the re-election of Messrs. Norman Barker,
Jr., Mark K. Mason, and Gordon V. Smith to serve until the merger is consummated
or until their successor is duly elected. For a description of each nominee's
principal occupation and business experience during the last five years and
present directorships, please see the following section entitled "Election of
Directors -- Nominees for Director at the 2001 Annual Meeting" beginning on page
43.
We have been advised by each nominee named in this proxy statement that he
is willing to be named as such herein and is willing to serve as a director if
elected. However, if any of the nominees should be unable to serve as a
director, the enclosed proxy will be voted in favor of the remainder of those
nominees not opposed by the stockholder on such proxy and may be voted for a
substitute nominee selected by the board of directors.
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF MESSRS.
NORMAN BARKER, JR., MARK K. MASON, AND GORDON V. SMITH AS DIRECTORS OF BANK
PLUS.
DIRECTORS
The following table sets forth the names and certain information with
respect to the three persons nominated by the board of directors for election as
directors of Bank Plus at the annual meeting and each other director of Bank
Plus who will continue to serve as a director after the annual meeting.
<Table>
<Caption>
FOR TERM
TO DIRECTOR
NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR AGE EXPIRE(2) SINCE POSITIONS HELD WITH BANK PLUS AND FIDELITY
- --------------------- --- --------- -------- ------------------------------------------
Norman Barker, Jr. ....... 79 2004 1994 Director of Bank Plus
Mark K. Mason............. 42 2004 1998 Vice Chairman, President and CEO of Bank
Plus, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Fidelity
Gordon V. Smith........... 69 2004 1996 Chairman and Director of Bank Plus
CONTINUING DIRECTORS
Irving R. Beimler(1)...... 55 2003 1999 Director of Bank Plus and Fidelity
Steven M. Ellis(1)........ 43 2003 2000 Director of Bank Plus
Victor H. Indiek.......... 63 2002 1999 Director of Bank Plus and Fidelity
Thomas E. King(1)......... 57 2002 2000 Director of Bank Plus
Robert W. Medearis........ 69 2002 1999 Director of Bank Plus
Jeffrey E. Susskind(1).... 48 2003 2000 Director of Bank Plus
</Table>
- ---------------
(1) See "Election of Directors -- Agreements with Certain Stockholder Groups"
below for a description of agreements between certain stockholder groups and
Bank Plus pursuant to which our board of directors agreed to nominate these
directors.
(2) All directors will resign upon consummation of the merger.
AGREEMENTS WITH CERTAIN STOCKHOLDER GROUPS
Mr. Beimler was nominated to the board in 1999, for a term of one year,
pursuant to two agreements with certain stockholder groups. One of the
stockholder groups consisted of persons and entities affiliated with Hovde
Financial, Inc. (to which we refer in this proxy statement as the "Hovde
Group"). The other stockholder group consisted of entities affiliated with
LaSalle Financial Partners, Inc. (to which we refer in this proxy statement as
the "LaSalle Group"). The two agreements with the stockholder groups were filed
as exhibits to our Report on Form 8-K dated March 26, 1999. Pursuant to these
two agreements, and in
42
48
consideration of our agreement to nominate Mr. Beimler to the board for a term
of one year, the Hovde Group and the LaSalle Group agreed to withdraw notices of
intent to nominate directors and propose resolutions at our 1999 annual meeting
of stockholders, and agreed to forbear, until April 28, 2000, from taking or
participating in various actions aimed at a change in control of Bank Plus.
The agreements with the Hovde Group and the LaSalle Group expired on April
28, 2000, and were not renewed.
In 2000, Mr. Beimler was renominated to our board for a term of three
years, Messrs. Ellis and Susskind were nominated to our board for terms of three
years, and Mr. King was nominated to our board for a term of two years, pursuant
to two agreements with different stockholder groups. One of the stockholder
groups consisted of persons and entities affiliated with Strome Partners, L.P.
(to which we refer in this proxy statement as the "Strome Group"). The other
stockholder group consisted of persons and entities affiliated with Tontine
Management, L.L.C. (to which we refer in this proxy statement as the "Tontine
Group"). The two agreements with these stockholder groups were filed as exhibits
to our Report on Form 8-K dated March 31, 2000. Mr. King and Mr. Susskind were
nominated in order to obtain the agreement from the Strome Group, while Mr.
Ellis was nominated in order to obtain the agreement from the Tontine Group.
Both the Strome Group and the Tontine Group conditioned their agreements on the
renomination of Mr. Beimler. Under the agreements, the Strome Group and the
Tontine Group agreed, for a term expiring April 30, 2001, to forbear from
engaging or participating in various actions aimed at a change in control of
Bank Plus.
As of the date of this proxy statement, we have not entered into agreements
extending or renewing the terms of the agreements with the Strome Group or the
Tontine Group, and no other agreements with stockholder groups or other parties
in respect of the selection of directors are in effect.
Set forth below is certain information concerning the principal occupation
and business experience of each of the persons listed in the table above during
the past five years.
NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR AT THE 2001 ANNUAL MEETING
Norman Barker, Jr., served as Chairman of the Board of Fidelity from August
1994 until May 1996, and as Chairman of the Board of Bank Plus from May 1996
until July 1997. He was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
First Interstate Bank of California until his retirement in 1986. He served as
Chairman of the Board of Pacific American Income Shares, Inc., a bond fund, from
1974 until 1998. Mr. Barker also serves as a director of TCW Convertible
Securities, Inc. and ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Mark K. Mason was appointed Vice Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Bank Plus and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fidelity in
October 1998 after having been appointed interim Chief Executive Officer in
September 1998 after the resignation of the prior Chief Executive Officer. He
has over 18 years of experience in accounting, finance, real estate and banking
including serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Fidelity between 1994 and 1995, leaving after the successful completion of a
restructuring and recapitalization. Mr. Mason had returned to Bank Plus in May
1998 as its Executive Vice President and Chief Operating and Financial Officer
prior to his appointment as Chief Executive Officer. Between 1995 and May 1998,
Mr. Mason served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
First Alliance Corporation, a mortgage banking firm. Prior to 1994, Mr. Mason
served as a Senior Manager at Deloitte & Touche, an international public
accounting firm and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The
Eadington Companies, a diversified company involved in real estate development,
agriculture and lumber products. Mr. Mason is a Certified Public Accountant in
the State of California.
Gordon V. Smith joined the Fidelity Board in 1996 and was named Chairman of
the Board of Bank Plus in July 1997. He is chairman, founder and principal
stockholder of Miller & Smith, Inc., a diversified real estate investment and
construction company in the Washington, D.C. area. Mr. Smith also serves as a
director of Crown Northcorp, Inc., a real estate management company located in
Columbus, Ohio. From 1987 until 1993, he served as Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of Providence Savings and Loan Association in Virginia.
43
49
CONTINUING DIRECTORS
Mr. Beimler has served as Senior Vice President and Merchant Banking
Manager at Hovde Capital, Inc., an investment banking firm located in
Washington, D.C., since November 1997. From January 1996 through November 1997,
Mr. Beimler was a self-employed consultant in Washington, D.C., providing
litigation support, training course development and other consulting services
for private companies and public agencies, including the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation. From September 1994 through January 1996, Mr. Beimler
served as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of The Riggs
National Bank in Washington, D.C. From 1974 through 1994, Mr. Beimler was
employed by Fleet Bank and predecessor institutions, serving as Executive Vice
President and Chief Credit Officer of Fleet Bank of New York from 1990 through
1994.
Mr. Ellis has served since 1997 on the board of directors of Century
Capital Financial, Inc., the holding company of City National Bank of Kilgore,
Texas. He also currently serves as stockholder, director and advisor of The
Winebroker, Inc., a broker of fine wines. Mr. Ellis is currently Vice President,
Treasurer, Secretary and Director of Davis BanCorporation, Inc., a bank holding
company headquartered in Davis, Oklahoma that owns 100% of the common stock of
First National Bank of Davis, Oklahoma. From 1990 to 1996, Mr. Ellis served as
Senior Vice President, Treasurer, Director and One-Third Owner of CAI
Corporation, a privately held investment corporation specializing in investments
in publicly traded thrifts, banks and other equities. From 1990 to 1993, Mr.
Ellis was Chief Executive Officer of Mortgage Innovations, Inc., a consulting
firm specializing in financial, operational and valuation consulting services to
the mortgage banking, thrift and banking industries.
Mr. Indiek has over 35 years experience in the financial services and real
estate industries. He currently runs his own consulting firm, Indiek Realty, in
Newport Beach, California which was started in 1995. Previously, from 1998
through 2000 he was President of Brennan Enterprises, LLC a real estate
investment firm located in San Francisco. He served as Executive Vice President
of Kennedy-Wilson International from 1989 until 1995. Before then, Mr. Indiek
had extensive experience as an executive officer of several financial
institutions, including as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of FCA/American Savings & Loan Association from 1983 until 1988. Mr. Indiek
served as one of the original executive officers of Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (Freddie Mac) from 1970 to 1977, and was its President and Chief
Executive Officer from 1974 through 1977.
Mr. King has served as principal of Business Solutions Consulting, focusing
on general business advice, strategies and planning, from July 1998 through
November 1999, and from May 2001 through the present. From November 1999 through
May 2001, he was Regional Vice President for SOS Staffing Services, Inc., which
is a staffing solutions company. From July 1997 to July 1998, Mr. King was
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Fullerton Community
Bank. From June 1994 to September 1996, Mr. King was President, Chief Executive
Officer, and Director of Bank of Southern California. From April 1992 to April
1994, Mr. King was President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of
CapitolBank Sacramento. Mr. King was an officer with various positions and
responsibilities at Security Pacific National Bank and its affiliates from 1969
to 1992.
Mr. Medearis is the President, Chief Executive Officer and co-owner of
Chalice Investment, Inc., a company engaged in joint ventures and related
entrepreneurial and international management consulting activities in the former
Soviet Union, primarily the Republic of Georgia, since 1992. Since 1980, Mr.
Medearis has served as a director of eight companies, both private and public,
in the engineering, real estate and banking industries. He was a member of the
board of directors of Commerce Security Bank in Sacramento from 1991 through
1997 and was the founder of Silicon Valley Bank and served as its Chairman from
1983 until 1989. Mr. Medearis is currently a director of Sherman Homes, a
homebuilder in Bellevue, Washington, TecHarmonic, a firm engaged in the
production of abatement equipment for Silicon Valley wafer production, and is
the Chairman of Design Power, Inc., a Silicon Valley software company. Mr.
Medearis was a Consulting Professor at the Graduate School of Construction
Management, Stanford University, from 1969 until 1998, and is currently a
Consulting Professor at the School of Management, University of California,
Davis.
44
50
Mr. Susskind has served since 1999 as a consultant with Strome Investment
Management, L.P. and from 1992 through 1998 as a principal in its predecessor
company Strome, Susskind Investment Management, L.P. From 1991 to 1998, Mr.
Susskind served as a director of Sheridan Energy, Inc. and from 1998 to 1999 as
its Chairman of the Board. Mr. Susskind is a director of RB Asset, Inc., a real
estate company. Mr. Susskind received a law degree from the University of
Michigan Law School in 1979.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Set forth below are our executive officers (other than Mr. Mason -- see
"Election of Directors -- Nominees for Director at 2001 Annual Meeting" above),
together with the positions currently held by those persons.
<Table>
<Caption>
NAME AGE POSITION HELD WITH BANK PLUS AND FIDELITY
---- --- -----------------------------------------
James E. Stutz.......... 58 President, Chief Operating Officer and Director of
Fidelity
Godfrey B. Evans........ 47 Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer
and General Counsel of Bank Plus and Fidelity
John M. Michel.......... 42 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Bank Plus and Fidelity
Ronald A. Stoffers...... 39 Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of
Fidelity
</Table>
Mr. Stutz joined Fidelity in 1994 as Executive Vice President, Retail
Banking. Mr. Stutz was named President of Fidelity in June 1996, its Chief
Operating Officer in July 1997 and became a director of Fidelity in October
1997. Prior to joining Fidelity, Mr. Stutz served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer, Consumer Banking, of HomeFed Bank from 1985 to
1994, where he was responsible for a 215 branch network. Mr. Stutz was also
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Columbus Savings, a wholly-
owned subsidiary of HomeFed Corporation, where he was responsible for the
consolidation of several savings institutions and the subsequent merger of the
company into HomeFed Bank.
Mr. Evans joined Fidelity as Senior Vice President and Senior Corporate
Counsel in 1987 and has been General Counsel of Fidelity since 1989 and of Bank
Plus since its formation. He served as Corporate Secretary of Fidelity from 1990
until 1999 and of Bank Plus from its formation in 1996 until 1999, and resumed
serving as Corporate Secretary in 2000. Mr. Evans became an Executive Vice
President of Fidelity in 1994. He was appointed Chief Administrative Officer of
Bank Plus and Fidelity in November 1998. Mr. Evans is a member of the State Bar
of California.
Mr. Michel, a certified public accountant, was appointed Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Bank Plus Corporation and Fidelity
Federal Bank in November 1998. He has over 20 years of experience in accounting
and finance, including serving as Senior Vice President and Director of Planning
at Fidelity from June 1998 to November 1998 and from March 1995 to April 1996.
From April 1996 until June 1998, Mr. Michel served as Vice President of Finance
for First Alliance Corporation, a mortgage banking firm. Mr. Michel served as
Vice President Accounting at the Akins Companies, a residential real estate
development company, from 1989 until 1995. Prior to 1989, Mr. Michel served as a
senior manager at Deloitte & Touche, a national public accounting firm.
Mr. Stoffers joined Fidelity in June 1998 as Senior Vice President and
Chief Credit Officer. He was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief
Credit Officer of Fidelity in November 2000. Mr. Stoffers came to Fidelity from
Sanwa Bank California, where he worked from 1993 to 1998 and served as its Vice
President and Manager of Credit Policy and Portfolio Management. Prior to that,
from 1990 to 1993, Mr. Stoffers served as a Senior Vice President at The Secura
Group, where he provided advisory services to clients on matters relating to
credit process, credit risk management, loan review, due diligence, credit
policies, credit strategy development and training. Prior to that Mr. Stoffers
served as a manager at Deloitte and Touche and as an Associate National Bank
Examiner at the Comptroller of the Currency.
45
51
INVOLVEMENT IN CERTAIN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Mr. Mason was a member of the board of directors and the Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of First Alliance Corporation and First
Alliance Mortgage Company from November 1995 until his resignation in May 1998.
Mr. Michel was Vice President of Finance of FAMCO from April 1996 until his
resignation in June 1998. First Alliance Corporation and First Alliance Mortgage
Company filed for protection under Chapter 11 of Bankruptcy code in March 2000.
46
52
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth the compensation earned
during the three years ended December 31, 2000 by our chief executive officer
and the four other most highly compensated executive officers during 2000 who
were serving as executive officers at December 31, 2000 (to which we refer in
this proxy statement as the "Named Executive Officers"):
<Table>
<Caption>
ANNUAL COMPENSATION SECURITIES
-------------------- UNDERLYING ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY(1) BONUS(1) OPTIONS COMPENSATION(2)
--------------------------- ---- --------- -------- ---------- ---------------
Mark K. Mason(3)..................... 2000 $300,000 $225,000 25,000(7) $5,100
Vice Chairman, President and 1999 300,000 159,400 -- 3,957
CEO of Bank Plus 1998 190,385 134,000 555,000(4)(7) 863
Chairman and CEO of Fidelity
James E. Stutz....................... 2000 $288,800 $144,400 250,000(6) $4,504
President and COO of Fidelity 1999 288,800 104,700 250,000(5) 4,800
1998 299,908 50,000 32,250 3,900
Godfrey B. Evans..................... 2000 $230,000 $120,800 -- $4,019
EVP, CAO and General Counsel of 1999 230,000 80,500 -- 4,295
Bank Plus and Fidelity 1998 219,277 50,000 250,000(4) 3,763
John M. Michel....................... 2000 $198,846 $ 95,000 -- $5,097
EVP and CFO of Bank Plus 1999 185,000 64,800 -- 4,800
and Fidelity 1998 81,923 50,000 250,000 2,800
Ronald A. Stoffers................... 2000 $154,308 $ 66,600 50,000 $2,549
EVP and CCO of Fidelity 1999 150,000 21,300 8,000 1,212
1998 89,423 35,000 -- --
</Table>
- ---------------
(1) Amounts shown include cash compensation earned and received by the executive
officer as well as amounts earned but deferred at the election of those
officers under our Deferred Compensation Plan. Bonuses are presented in the
period earned and may have been paid in subsequent years. Amounts in the
"Salary" column for 1998 reflect 27 two-week pay periods, instead of the
usual 26 pay periods.
(2) "Other Compensation" consists of our matching contributions to our 401(k)
Plan.
(3) Mr. Mason became Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
effective May 11, 1998, and was named Chief Executive Officer of both Bank
Plus and Fidelity effective October 28, 1998. Mr. Mason's 1998 bonus was
paid pursuant to the terms of his agreement with Bank Plus entered into at
the time he was hired as Chief Financial Officer in May 1998.
(4) Includes options cancelled and reissued at a new exercise price of $3.8125
per share.
(5) Includes 210,000 options cancelled and reissued at a new exercise price of
$6.00 per share.
(6) Represents options cancelled and reissued at a new exercise price of $3.00
per share. See "Stock Option Grants in 2000" below.
(7) In 1998, in connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer, Mr.
Mason was granted 580,000 options to purchase Bank Plus common stock under
our Stock Option and Equity Incentive Plan. In order to facilitate the
issuance of stock options to other managers hired in 1999, Mr. Mason agreed
with Bank Plus to surrender 25,000 of his outstanding stock options
temporarily until such time as sufficient shares became available under the
Stock Option and Equity Incentive Plan to replace those options. We agreed
to reinstate the options surrendered by Mr. Mason as soon as practicable at
a grant price and terms to cause him to be in the same economic position as
he would have been in if he had not surrendered the options. Pursuant to
this agreement, the 25,000 options were reinstated on October 24, 2000.
47
53
STOCK OPTION GRANTS IN 2000
<Table>
<Caption>
POTENTIAL MAXIMUM
REALIZABLE VALUE AT
ASSUMED ANNUAL RATES
NUMBER OF PERCENT OF OF STOCK PRICE
SHARES TOTAL OPTIONS APPRECIATION
UNDERLYING GRANTED TO EXERCISE FOR OPTION TERM
OPTIONS EMPLOYEES IN PRICE/ EXPIRATION ----------------------
NAME GRANTED FISCAL YEAR SHARE DATE 5%(3) 10%(3)
---- ---------- -------------- -------- ---------- -------- ----------
James E. Stutz....... 250,000(1) 74.2% $3.0000(1) 1/26/10 $471,671(4) $1,195,307(4)
Mark K. Mason........ 25,000(2) 7.4% 3.8125(2) 11/18/08 59,942(5) 151,904(5)
Ronald A. Stoffers... 50,000 14.8% 3.2500 11/29/10 102,195 258,983
</Table>
- ---------------
(1) Represents options repriced on January 26, 2000 from $6.00 to $3.00.
(2) See note 7 under "Summary Compensation Table" above.
(3) In accordance with SEC rules, these columns show gains that might exist for
the respective options, assuming the market price of our common stock
appreciates from the date of grant over a period of ten years at the
annualized rates of five and ten percent, respectively. If the stock price
does not increase above the exercise price at the date of grant, realized
value to the named executive from these options will be zero.
(4) Measured from the repricing that occurred on January 26, 2000.
(5) Measured from the original option grant date of November 18, 1998.
UNEXERCISED STOCK OPTIONS
During 2000, none of the Named Executive Officers exercised any stock
options. The following table provides information concerning unexercised options
held by the Named Executive Officers as of the end of 2000:
<Table>
<Caption>
SECURITIES UNDERLYING VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNEXERCISED OPTIONS AT IN-THE-MONEY
YEAR-END OPTIONS AT YEAR-END
NAME EXERCISABLE/UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE/UNEXERCISABLE
---- ------------------------- -------------------------
Mark K. Mason.................... 145,000/435,000 --/--(1)
James E. Stutz................... 62,500/187,500 $50,781/$152,344(2)
Godfrey B. Evans................. 62,500/187,500 --/--(1)
John M. Michel................... 62,500/187,500 --/--(1)
Ronald A. Stoffers............... 2,000/56,000 --/$28,125(3)
</Table>
- ---------------
(1) Based upon the difference between the option exercise price of $3.8125 per
share and the closing price of the common stock on December 31, 2000 of
$3.8125 per share.
(2) Based upon the difference between the option exercise price of $3.00 per
share and the closing price of the common stock on December 31, 2000 of
$3.8125 per share.
(3) Based upon the difference between the option exercise prices of $3.25 per
share on 50,000 options and the closing price of the common stock on
December 31, 2000 of $3.8125 per share.
48
54
The options vest on a percentage basis based on the market price of Bank
Plus common stock, per the following schedule:
<Table>
<Caption>
PERFORMANCE VESTING
CRITERIA:
PER SHARE MARKET VALUE VESTING
- ---------------------- -------
$4.00 10%
5.00 25%
6.00 40%
7.00 55%
8.00 70%
9.00 85%
10.00 100%
</Table>
The per share market value must average at the incremental price level for
a rolling period of 20 business days to achieve the relevant vesting percentage.
The options will become fully vested without regard to stock price in the event
of the earlier to occur of a change in control or the seventh anniversary of the
date of grant.
TEN-YEAR OPTION REPRICINGS
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our
exchange of outstanding options with certain of its Named Executive Officers in
2000:
<Table>
<Caption>
WEIGHTED
LENGTH OF
NUMBER OF WEIGHTED ORIGINAL
SECURITIES MARKET PRICE EXERCISE OPTION TERM
UNDERLYING OF STOCK AT PRICE AT REMAINING AT
OPTIONS TIME OF TIME OF NEW DATE OF
REPRICED OR REPRICING OR REPRICING OR EXERCISE REPRICING OR
NAME DATE AMENDED AMENDMENT AMENDMENT PRICE AMENDMENT
---- ------- ----------- ------------ ------------- -------- ------------
James E. Stutz................. 1/26/00 250,000 $3.00 $6.00 $3.00 114 months
</Table>
RETIREMENT INCOME (DEFINED BENEFIT) PLAN
Fidelity maintains a Retirement Income Plan which is a qualified,
non-contributory defined benefit retirement plan. The Retirement Income Plan
provides for monthly retirement payments or an actuarially equivalent lump sum
to or on behalf of each covered employee or beneficiary upon retirement at age
65 or upon early retirement (i.e., the attainment of age 55 and the completion
of 10 years of service) and, under certain circumstances, upon disability, death
or other termination of employment, based upon the employee's average monthly
salary and the aggregate number of years of service. Effective February 28,
1994, the Retirement Income Plan was suspended, thereby freezing benefits.
The following table illustrates approximate annual benefits payable under
the Retirement Income Plan at normal retirement age for various combinations of
service and compensation:
<Table>
<Caption>
YEARS OF SERVICE
AVERAGE FINAL -----------------------------------------------
COMPENSATION 15 20 25 30 35
- ------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
$ 50,000 $11,302 $15,069 $18,836 $22,603 $26,370
100,000 24,427 32,569 40,711 48,853 56,995
150,000 37,552 50,069 62,586 75,103 87,620
200,000 37,552 50,069 62,586 75,103 87,620
250,000 37,552 50,069 62,586 75,103 87,620
300,000 37,552 50,069 62,586 75,103 87,620
350,000 37,552 50,069 62,586 75,103 87,620
400,000 37,552 50,069 62,586 75,103 87,620
</Table>
Compensation under the Retirement Income Plan includes all regular pay,
excluding overtime, commissions and bonuses, limited by the Internal Revenue
Code Section 401(a)(17) compensation limit. The benefit
49
55
amounts listed above were computed on a 10-year certain and life basis, which is
the normal form under the plan, and are not subject to deduction for Social
Security or other offset amounts.
Mr. Evans has 7 years of credited service in the Retirement Income Plan.
Mr. Mason, Mr. Stutz, Mr. Michel and Mr. Stoffers are not participants in the
Retirement Income Plan.
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS WITH EXECUTIVE OFFICERS; TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND
CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
We have entered into employment agreements with all of its Named Executive
Officers. The agreements include terms and conditions relating to termination of
employment and change in control of Bank Plus.
AGREEMENT WITH MR. MASON
Mr. Mason and Bank Plus entered into an employment agreement dated as of
October 28, 1998 (and since amended) that provides for Mr. Mason's employment as
Vice Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Bank Plus and Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of Fidelity, at an annual base salary of at least
$300,000. Mr. Mason is eligible for annual incentive bonuses with a target range
of 75% to 150% of base salary. Mr. Mason is also entitled to participate in our
medical benefits, dental and 401(k) retirement plans available to all full time
employees and in an executive medical and dental benefits plan available only to
executive officers of Bank Plus.
The term of the agreement expires on July 31, 2002. However, commencing on
August 1, 2002 and thereafter at the end of each month, the term of the
agreement will automatically be extended for one additional month unless and
until the boards of either Bank Plus or Fidelity elect not to permit further
extension. If a change of control of Bank Plus or Fidelity occurs during the
term of the agreement, the agreement will continue in effect for a period of
three years after the change in control.
If Mr. Mason's employment is terminated prior to a change in control other
than (i) for cause or (ii) because of death, disability or retirement, his
employment agreement provides that he will receive, subject to certain
limitations, his full base salary until the second anniversary of the date of
termination, plus a lump sum payment equal to two times his average annual bonus
during the prior two fiscal years. In the event Mr. Mason is terminated other
than for cause within thirty-six months following a change in control, Mr. Mason
will receive a lump sum payment in the amount of 2.99 times the sum of (1) his
base salary at the time of the change in control, (2) his average annual bonus
over the past three years and (3) an amount equal to the matching contribution
he would have received under the Fidelity's 401(k) plan if he had made the
maximum contribution under the plan during the year in which the change in
control occurs. In addition, if Mr. Mason's employment is terminated within
thirty-six months following a change in control, his health and welfare benefits
will continue for three years, or until such earlier time that he receives
equivalent benefits from a new employer or reaches the age of sixty-five. The
agreement also provides for, under certain specified circumstances, the payment
of an additional amount to cover excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the
Internal Revenue Code as a result of the agreed payment being defined as an
"excess parachute payment" within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal
Revenue Code.
A "change in control" is generally defined in Mr. Mason's agreement (and in
the other executive employment agreements) as: (a) the acquisition of 50% or
more of Bank Plus' voting stock by any "person" (as defined) with certain
limited exclusions, (b) such time as directors who were added to the board
without the approval of two-thirds of the incumbent directors or who were added
to the board under the threat of a proxy contest constitutes 50% or more of the
total directors (c) a merger or consolidation of Bank Plus with any "person" (as
defined), other than a merger or consolidation of Bank Plus that results in Bank
Plus's stockholders no longer owning 50% or more of the surviving entity, or a
sale of all or substantially all of Bank Plus 's assets, (d) a sale of all or
substantially all of the assets of Fidelity or (e) a merger or other combination
of Fidelity that results in Bank Plus ceasing to own more than 50% of the voting
securities of Fidelity (or the surviving entity in such combination).
50
56
Termination by Bank Plus because of death, disability, retirement or cause,
or the executive's resignation (other than for "good reason" as described below)
does not entitle the executive to any benefits under his employment agreement.
Termination for "cause" requires either (i) a willful and continued failure to
perform substantially all of his duties or (ii) gross negligence, dishonesty,
incompetence, willful misconduct, breach of fiduciary duty involving personal
profit or willful violation of law. Termination for "good reason" means that the
executive may terminate his own employment and still receive benefits under the
agreement if (among other reasons listed in the agreement) (1) his status or
position in Bank Plus has materially and adversely changed, (2) his base salary
is reduced, (3) Bank Plus requires him to be based at an office more than
thirty-five miles from his current office or (4) after a change in control, Bank
Plus fails to continue any benefit plan in which he was participating prior to
the change in control.
AGREEMENT WITH MR. STUTZ
Mr. Stutz and Fidelity entered into an employment agreement dated January
26, 2000 (and since amended), that provides for Mr. Stutz's employment by
Fidelity as its President and Chief Operating Officer at an annual base salary
of at least $288,800. Mr. Stutz is eligible for incentive bonuses with a target
range of 50% to 100% of base salary. Mr. Stutz is also entitled to participate
in our medical benefits, dental and 401(k) retirement plans available to all
full time employees and in an executive medical and dental benefits plan
available only to executive officers of Bank Plus.
The term of the agreement expires on July 31, 2003. However, on July 31,
2003, and on each July 31 thereafter, the term will be automatically extended
for one additional year unless, at least ninety (90) days prior to that July 31
date, Fidelity has given notice that the agreement will not be extended. If a
change of control of Bank Plus or Fidelity occurs during the term of the
agreement, the agreement will continue in effect for a period of two years after
the change in control.
In the event of a change in control, Mr. Stutz is immediately entitled to a
lump sum payment of three times his annual base salary, bonuses, and 401(k)
matching contributions without regard to whether his employment is terminated
following the change in control. Other terms and conditions in Mr. Stutz's
employment agreement are substantially identical to those of Mr. Mason.
AGREEMENT WITH MR. EVANS
Mr. Evans and Bank Plus entered into an employment agreement dated as of
November 19, 1998 (and since amended), that provides for Mr. Evans' employment
as Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, and General Counsel
of Bank Plus and Fidelity, at an annual base salary of at least $230,000. Mr.
Evans is eligible for annual incentive bonuses with a target range of 50% to
100% of base salary. Mr. Evans is also entitled to participate in our medical
benefits, dental and 401(k) retirement plans available to all full time
employees and in an executive medical and dental benefits plan available only to
executive officers of Bank Plus.
The term of the agreement expires on July 31, 2002. However, commencing on
August 1, 2002 and thereafter at the end of each month, the term of the
agreement will automatically be extended for one additional month unless and
until the Boards of either Bank Plus or Fidelity elect not to permit further
extension. If a change of control of Bank Plus or Fidelity occurs during the
term of the agreement, the agreement will continue in effect for a period of two
years after the change in control.
Mr. Evans' benefits in the event of involuntary termination are
substantially identical to those provided for Mr. Mason, except that the change
in control benefit is triggered by a termination within twenty-four (24) months
(rather than thirty-six (36) months) following a change in control, and his
termination benefit is based on 2.0 (rather than 2.99) times his annual base
salary, average bonus, and 401(k) matching contributions. Other terms and
conditions in Mr. Evans' employment agreement are substantially identical to
those of Mr. Mason.
51
57
AGREEMENT WITH MR. MICHEL
Mr. Michel and Bank Plus entered into an employment agreement dated as of
November 19, 1998 (and since amended), that provides for Mr. Michel's employment
as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Bank Plus and
Fidelity, at an annual base salary of at least $185,000. Mr. Michel is eligible
for annual incentive bonuses with a target range of 50% to 100% of base salary.
Mr. Michel is also entitled to participate in our medical benefits, dental and
401(k) retirement plans available to all full time employees and in an executive
medical and dental benefits plan available only to executive officers of Bank
Plus.
The term of the agreement expires on July 31, 2002. However, commencing on
August 1, 2002 and thereafter at the end of each month, the term of the
agreement will automatically be extended for one additional month unless and
until the boards of either Bank Plus or Fidelity elect not to permit further
extension. If a change of control of Bank Plus or Fidelity occurs during the
term of the agreement, the agreement will continue in effect for a period of two
years after the change in control.
The general terms and conditions of Mr. Michel's employment agreement are
substantially identical to those of Mr. Evans.
AGREEMENT WITH MR. STOFFERS
Mr. Stoffers was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Credit
Officer of Fidelity on November 29, 2000. In connection with that promotion, Mr.
Stoffers and Fidelity entered into an employment agreement that is substantially
identical to the employment agreements with Mr. Evans and Mr. Michel except in
the following respects: base salary of at least $170,000; involuntary
termination benefit prior to a change in control based on one year's base
salary, bonus and 401(k) employer match; and involuntary termination benefit for
termination after a change in control based on 1 1/2 year's base salary, average
bonuses, and 401(k) employer match.
The term of the agreement expires on November 29, 2002. However, on
November 29, 2002, and on each November 29 thereafter, the term will be
automatically extended for one additional year unless, at least ninety (90) days
prior to that November 29 date, Fidelity has given notice that the agreement
will not be extended. If a change of control of Bank Plus or Fidelity occurs
during the term of the agreement, the agreement will continue in effect for a
period of two years after the change in control.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Board Retainer and Fees. Directors receive no current cash compensation.
Instead, all retainer and meeting fees described in the ensuing paragraph (other
than reimbursement of expenses) are paid in the form of deferred stock units
that are credited to the directors' deferred stock accounts when earned, and the
value of such shares is paid in cash upon a director's retirement from the
board.
Directors earn an annual retainer of $30,000. Directors who serve on both
the Bank Plus and the Fidelity boards earn an additional $5,000 annual retainer.
Our chairman of the board earns an additional annual retainer of $60,000.
Committee chairs earn an annual retainer of $3,000, except for the chairs of the
audit committee of Bank Plus and the Credit Risk Committee of Fidelity, who each
earn an annual retainer of $6,000. Meeting fees are $1,000 for board meetings
and $850 for committee meetings. Participation in telephonic meetings are
compensated for at the same rate as in-person meetings unless the meetings last
less than 30 minutes, in which case meeting fees are earned at 50% of the normal
rate. In addition, our chairman of the board receives cash payments of up to
$500 per month to reimburse his secretarial and other administrative expenses
related to the performance of his duties.
Non-Employee Director Retirement Plan. Non-employee directors who (1) were
initially elected prior to January 1, 1996, (2) have at least three years of
board service and (3) have reached the age of 55 are eligible to participate in
the Non-Employee Director Retirement Plan. Directors elected after January 1,
1996 are not eligible to participate in the Plan. Eligible directors, after
termination from board service for any reason other than cause, are entitled to
receive a quarterly payment equal to one quarter of their average annual
compensation (including compensation for service on the board of any of Bank
Plus' subsidiaries), including
52
58
all retainers and meeting fees, received during their last three years of board
service. Such payments commence at the beginning of the first fiscal quarter
subsequent to termination and continue for a 3-year period. If a director's
board membership is terminated for cause, no benefits are payable under this
plan.
If an eligible director's board membership is terminated within two years
following the effective date of a change in control, then he or she shall be
eligible for a lump sum payment in an amount that is the greatest of: (1) 150%
times average annual compensation during the preceding 3-year period, (2) the
sum of all retirement benefits payable under normal retirement provisions
described in the preceding paragraph or (3) $78,000. This lump sum payment would
be in lieu of, and not in addition to, the retirement benefits described in the
preceding paragraph.
Prior to becoming an employee of Bank Plus, Mr. Mason served as a
non-employee director for just short of 36 months. As an employee he continued
his service as a director and now has in excess of 36 months of service as a
director. There is some uncertainty as to whether, under these circumstances,
Mr. Mason is vested in the plan. On June 2, 2001, concurrently with our
execution of the definitive agreement pertaining to the merger, Mr. Mason agreed
to waive his interest in the plan subject to the following conditions: (i) the
merger is closed; (ii) the per share merger consideration is not less than $7.25
per share; (iii) Mr. Mason remains employed in his current capacity through the
closing of the merger; and (iv) Mr. Mason receives all of the benefits he is
entitled to receive under his agreements with Bank Plus and the 2001 Annual
Incentive Plan for Officers and Key Employees (a plan which is used to determine
what portion of the "target" bonus provided in employment contracts will
actually be paid).
Stock Option and Equity Incentive Plan. On December 11, 1995, the board of
directors of Fidelity adopted the 1996 Stock Option Plan and granted awards
pursuant thereto to its non-employee directors subject to subsequent approval by
Fidelity's stockholders. At a annual meeting held on February 9, 1996,
Fidelity's stockholders approved the plan and in May 1996, Bank Plus assumed the
plan in connection with the formation of Bank Plus. Accordingly, each of Bank
Plus' and Fidelity's non-employee directors received options representing 23,000
shares of common stock. All such options were granted at an exercise price of
$8.35 per share. Ten percent of the options granted to each non-employee
director became exercisable immediately upon stockholder approval and another
thirty percent became exercisable on each of the first, second and third
anniversaries of such approval. On April 30, 1997, our stockholders approved
certain amendments to and a restatement of the plan, which was renamed the Bank
Plus Corporation Stock Option and Equity Incentive Plan. Among other things, the
amended plan provides that each non-employee director of Bank Plus and Fidelity
will receive automatic annual grants of options to purchase 2,500 shares of
common stock, at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the stock
on the grant date, which will be fully vested and exercisable upon grant.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The annual report of the compensation committee is set forth below. The
report of the compensation committee shall not be deemed incorporated by
reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy
statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (to which
we refer in this proxy statement as the "Securities Act"), or under the Exchange
Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this report by
reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts or
regulations thereunder.
INTRODUCTION -- COMMITTEE COMPOSITION
The Joint Compensation/Stock Option Committee of the boards of directors of
Bank Plus and Fidelity currently consists of five members who administer, review
and make recommendations for full board approval of the components of directors
and executive compensation of Bank Plus and Fidelity. Each committee member is
an independent, non-employee director of either Bank Plus or Fidelity. From
April 2000 to date, the committee members are Robert W. Medearis, Committee
Chairman, Norman Barker, Jr., Thomas E.
53
59
King, Gordon V. Smith, and S. Craig Tompkins (a director of Fidelity). The
committee believes that the actions of the executive officers have the potential
to impact the profitability and stockholder value of Bank Plus. Therefore, the
committee places considerable importance on its task of designing and
administering executive compensation plans.
OBJECTIVES OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The objectives of our executive compensation program are to: (1) increase
stockholder value, (2) improve the overall performance of Bank Plus, (3)
maximize the success of the banking unit directly impacted by the executive's
performance, and (4) to attract, motivate and retain successful executive
talent.
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY
The general philosophy underlying our executive compensation program is to:
- Attract, retain and motivate high-performing executives.
- Provide competitive levels of compensation consistent with achieving our
goals.
- Reward superior performance.
To ensure competitiveness, the committee reviews compensation levels of a
peer group of financial institutions within a defined range of asset size, and
considered as potential competitors for executive talent. Peer group comparative
information is relevant; however, we also consider the unique challenges of our
goals, individual performance and the importance of retaining executive
management and other key employees.
COMPONENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The three primary components of executive compensation are:
- Base Salary
- Annual Cash Incentive Plan
- Stock Incentive Plan
Base Salary
Base salary has been designed to provide levels of compensation that are at
or near market competitive ranges. Each year, the committee reviews the salary
levels of the executive officers for external competitiveness, internal equity,
individual contribution and other subjective factors; however, salary increases
are generally administered in 18 month or longer cycles, excluding adjustments
for promotions. In January 2000 Mr. Michel's base salary was determined to be
below external competitive levels and therefore the committee recommended an
eight percent (8%) increase to his base salary. Concurrent with Mr. Stoffers
promotion to Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of Fidelity in
November 2000, his salary was increased to $170,000. There have been no
increases to other executives' base salaries since 1998.
Annual Cash Incentive Plan
In recognition of the unusual challenges in 2000, we adopted an award
philosophy that rewards both extraordinary individual efforts and outstanding
quantifiable performance results.
The target incentive award opportunities provided under the plan were 75%
of base salary for the CEO and 50% of base salary for the President and EVPs.
The plan also allowed for awards greater than target under certain
circumstances.
Corporate and individual incentive award goals are established at the
beginning of the year for each executive. The Chief Executive Officer's
incentive award opportunity is based 100% on the corporate goals. The
President's and Executive Vice Presidents' incentive award opportunities are
based 75% on corporate goals and 25% on individual goals.
54
60
The corporate performance goals for 2000 were based on (1) adjusted income
from core bank operations, (2) resolution of consumer and securities litigation,
(3) the planned sales of deposits and resolution of credit card operations, (4)
multi-family & commercial mortgage loan origination volume, and (5) the
maintenance or improvement of Fidelity's regulatory status.
Stock Incentive Plan
In December 2000, Mr. Ronald Stoffers, Chief Credit Officer was promoted to
Executive Vice President and received a grant of 50,000 option shares as part of
his promotion. In October 2000, 25,000 options were granted to Mr. Mason to
replace an equal number of shares that Mr. Mason had surrendered to facilitate
the hiring of other managers in 1999. We agreed to reinstate the options
surrendered by Mr. Mason as soon as practicable at a grant price and terms to
cause him to be in the same economic position as he would have been in if he had
not surrendered the options.
Chief Executive Officer Compensation
The committee applies the same philosophy and methodology in determining
the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer as with the President of
Fidelity and EVPs as discussed in the section entitled "Compensation
Committee -- Compensation Philosophy" beginning on page 54.
The Chief Executive Officer's compensation program consisted of a base
salary of $300,000, with a target incentive award opportunity of 75% of base
salary with a 100% corporate goal weighting. Under certain circumstances, this
incentive award could increase to 150% of base salary.
In evaluating the Chief Executive Officer's performance the committee
weighted the first three corporate goals (adjusted income, litigation
resolution, deposit sales & credit card operations resolution) more heavily than
the remaining two goals (loan origination volume, regulatory status). The
committee concluded that our management had significantly exceeded expectations
for the first three goals, met expectations for the regulatory goal and fell
short of the origination volume goal. Given this and the weightings attributed
to these goals, the committee awarded Mr. Mason 100% of his target goals
equating to 75% of his base salary, or $225,000.
Mr. Mason's base salary has not changed since his hiring as Chief Financial
Officer in May 1998.
The following members of the compensation committee have furnished the
foregoing report:
Robert W. Medearis, Chairman
Norman Barker, Jr.
Thomas E. King
Gordon V. Smith
55
61
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The performance graph shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any
general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any
filing under the Securities Act or under the Exchange Act except to the extent
that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and shall not
otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts or regulations thereunder.
The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on Bank
Plus' (or its predecessor's) common stock from March 31, 1997 to December 31,
2000 with the cumulative total return on a S&P 500 index and the Wall Street
Journal Savings & Loan Index, in each case assuming the investment of $100 on
March 31, 1997 at the closing price on that date and reinvestment of dividends.
The measurement period with respect to which the comparisons are made
corresponds to the period during which our common stock has been registered
under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
[PERFORMANCE GRAPH]
<Table>
<Caption>
WALL STREET JOURNAL S&L
INDEX S&P 500 BANK PLUS
----------------------- ------- ---------
3/31/97 100 100 100
6/30/97 122.97 107.27 104.82
9/30/97 150.24 113.74 124.1
12/31/97 150.41 120.81 121.69
3/31/98 165.73 139.32 143.98
6/30/98 151.69 143.38 118.07
9/30/98 125.05 128.6 43.07
12/31/98 139.63 155.44 42.17
3/31/99 144.52 162.66 46.39
6/30/99 131.54 173.58 51.81
9/30/99 113 162.2 41.57
12/31/99 102.11 185.79 27.71
3/31/00 29.62 189.5 15.66
6/30/00 31.78 183.94 29.22
9/30/00 41.88 181.65 37.95
12/31/00 53.32 166.95 36.75
</Table>
56
62
VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS THEREOF
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the shares of common stock beneficially
owned as of August 7, 2001 by all directors and executive officers as a group,
by each director, the Chief Executive Officer and the Named Executive Officers
of Bank Plus:
<Table>
<Caption>
SHARES OF
COMMON
STOCK SHARES TOTAL PERCENT OF
BENEFICIALLY UNDERLYING BENEFICIAL COMMON
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNED OPTIONS(1) OWNERSHIP STOCK
------------------------ ------------ ----------- ---------- ----------
Norman Barker, Jr. ........................... 1,250 33,000 34,250 *
Irving R. Beimler............................. 2,000 5,000 7,000 *
Steven M. Ellis............................... 40,100(2) 2,500 42,600 *
Victor H. Indiek.............................. -- 5,000 5,000 *
Thomas E. King................................ -- 2,500 2,500 *
Robert W. Medearis............................ 10,000 5,000 15,000 *
Gordon V. Smith............................... 626,612(3) 10,000 636,612 3.3%
Jeffrey E. Susskind........................... -- 2,500 2,500 *
Godfrey B. Evans.............................. 15,258 100,000 115,258 *
Mark K. Mason................................. 32,100 232,000 264,100 1.3%
John M. Michel................................ -- 100,000 100,000 *
James E. Stutz................................ 28,531(4) 100,000 128,531 *
Ronald A. Stoffers............................ -- 23,200 23,200 *
------- ------- --------- ----
All directors and named executive officers as
a group (13 persons)........................ 755,851 620,700 1,376,551 7.1%
======= ======= ========= ====
</Table>
- ---------------
(1) Includes all unexercised options issued to non-employee directors and the
vested portion of all unexercised options issued to Named Executive Officers
as of August 7, 2001.
(2) 1,100 of these shares are registered in the names of members of Mr. Ellis'
family, but Mr. Ellis holds or shares voting and investment power.
(3) 584,612 of these shares are registered in the name of Gordon V. and Helen C.
Smith Foundation, a Section 501(3)(c) organization of which Mr. Smith is
President. 29,200 of these shares are held in an IRA over which Mr. Smith
has voting and investment power. 12,800 of these shares are held in Mr.
Smith's spouse's IRA, over which Mr. Smith shares voting and investment
power. The shares reported here do not include 23,087 shares held by close
relatives of Mr. Smith over which Mr. Smith does not hold or share voting or
investment power.
(4) 25,000 of these shares are held in an IRA over which Mr. Stutz has voting
and investment power.
* Represents less than one percent of the outstanding shares of common stock.
57
63
SECURITY OWNERSHIP BY OTHERS
The following table sets forth, as of August 1, 2001, (i) the name of each
person we believe to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding
common stock, (ii) the total number of shares of our common stock beneficially
owned by each person and (iii) the percentage of our common stock outstanding
held by each such person.
<Table>
<Caption>
SHARES OF COMMON PERCENT OF
STOCK BENEFICIALLY COMMON
NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNED(1) STOCK
------------------------------------ ------------------ ----------
Eric D. Hovde.................................... 2,714,173(2) 14.0%
Steven D. Hovde
Financial Institution Partners, L.P.
Hovde Capital, Inc.
Financial Institution Partners II, L.P.
Hovde Capital, L.L.C.
Hancock Park Acquisition, L.P.
Hancock Park Acquisition, L.L.C.
Western Acquisition Partners, L.P.
Western Acquisitions, L.L.C.
Pacific Financial Investors, Ltd.
1826 Jefferson Place, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. .................. 1,320,300(3) 6.8%
1299 Ocean Avenue
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Schneider Capital Management, L.P. .............. 1,216,117 6.3%
460 East Swedesford Road
Wayne, PA 19087
</Table>
- ---------------
(1) Except as otherwise indicated the persons listed as beneficial owners of the
shares have the sole voting and investment power with respect to such
shares.
(2) According to Forms 3 and 4 filed with the SEC by Messrs. Eric D. and Steven
D. Hovde, they are deemed beneficial owners of 2,714,173 shares of our
common stock by virtue of their positions as the controlling stockholder and
director of the controlling member and/or managing member of Hovde Capital,
Inc., the general partner of Financial Institution Partners, L.P., Hovde
Capital, L.L.C., the general partner of Financial Institution Partners II,
L.P., Hancock Park Acquisition, L.L.C., the general partner of Hancock Park
Acquisition, L.P., Western Acquisitions, L.L.C., the general partner of
Western Acquisition Partners, L.P. and Pacific Financial Investors, Ltd.
Financial Institution Partners, L.P., Financial Institution Partners II,
L.P., Hancock Park Acquisition, L.L.C., Western Acquisition Partners, L.P.
and Pacific Financial Investors, Ltd. are the beneficial owners of
1,071,146, 808,976, 651,260, 140,000 and 42,791 shares of common stock,
respectively.
(3) According to a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC, Dimensional Fund Advisors,
Inc. (to whom we refer in this proxy statement as "Dimensional") has sole
voting power and investment power with respect to all of these shares.
Dimensional furnishes investment advice to four investment companies
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and serves as
investment manager to certain other investment vehicles including commingled
group trusts. We refer to these investment companies, trusts and accounts
are the "funds" In its role as investment advisor or manager, Dimensional
possesses voting and/or investment power over the shares that are owned by
the Funds. All shares are owned by the funds, and Dimensional disclaims
beneficial ownership of such shares.
58
64
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2000 have been
audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent public accountants.
Representatives of Deloitte & Touche will have an opportunity to make a
statement at the annual meeting and will be available at the annual meeting to
answer appropriate questions asked by Bank Plus stockholders.
AUDIT FEES
The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP for professional
services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements in 2000 and
the reviews of the financial statements included in our reports on Form 10-Q for
2000 were $277,000.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION FEES
No fees were billed for professional services rendered to Bank Plus and its
subsidiaries in 2000 for (A) directly or indirectly operating, or supervising
the operation of, the information system or local network of Bank Plus and its
subsidiaries, and (B) designing or implementing for Bank Plus or its
subsidiaries a hardware system that aggregates source data underlying the
financial statement or generates information that is significant to financial
statements taken as a whole.
ALL OTHER FEES
The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP to Bank Plus and its
subsidiaries in 2000, for all services other than those described in the two
paragraphs above, were $697,933.
The audit committee of the board of directors has considered and believes
that the provision of services described above under "All Other Fees" is
compatible with maintaining the independence of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Our audit committee is a joint committee with Fidelity's audit committee.
The Bank Plus members of the joint audit committee are Mr. Indiek, Chairman, and
Messrs. Ellis and Susskind. Our board of directors has adopted a written charter
for the audit committee, a copy of which is attached as Annex D to this proxy
statement. All of the members of the joint audit committee appointed by Bank
Plus are "independent" as independence is defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the
National Association of Securities Dealers' listing standards.
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
Our committee has reviewed and discussed with management of Bank Plus and
Deloitte & Touche, LLP the independent auditing firm of Bank Plus, the audited
financial statements of Bank Plus as of December 31, 2000. In addition, we have
discussed with Deloitte & Touche, LLP the matters required by Codification of
Statements on Auditing Standards No. 61.
The audit committee also has received and reviewed the written disclosures
and the letter from Deloitte & Touche, LLP required by Independence Standards
Board Statement No. 1, and we have discussed with that firm its independence
from Bank Plus. We also have discussed with management of Bank Plus and the
auditing firm such other matters and received such assurances from them as we
deemed appropriate.
Management is responsible for Bank Plus's internal controls and the
financial reporting process. Deloitte & Touche LLP is responsible for performing
an independent audit of Bank Plus's financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards and issuing a report thereon. The audit
committee's responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes. Bank Plus
has a written audit committee charter.
59
65
Based on the foregoing review and discussions and a review of the report of
Deloitte & Touche, LLP with respect to the Audited Financial Statements, and
relying thereon, we have recommended to the Bank Plus' board of directors the
inclusion of the audited financial statements in the Bank Plus' Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.
Submitted by the Bank Plus Audit
Committee
Victor H. Indiek, Audit Committee
Chairman
Steven M. Ellis
Jeffrey E. Susskind
OTHER MATTERS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES
In 2000, there were 16 meetings of the board of directors of Bank Plus. All
directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of meetings of the board of
directors and the committees of the board on which they served, in each case,
after the election of such individual to the board or such committee.
In 2000, Bank Plus had standing executive, audit and compensation
committees. The principal responsibilities of these committees and the number of
meetings of each held in 2000 appear below.
Executive Committee. Subject to the authority conferred on our other
committees, the executive committee is empowered to exercise all authority in
lieu of the board which may be exercised by a committee of the board pursuant to
applicable law. In addition, the executive committee has assumed nominating and
board development functions. Any stockholder who wishes to recommend a
prospective nominee for the board of directors for the executive committee's
consideration may do so by giving the candidate's name and qualifications to our
Corporate Secretary, 4565 Colorado Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90039. The
executive committee held one meeting in 2000. The members of the executive
committee are Mr. Smith, Chairman, and Messrs. Beimler, Mason and Medearis.
Audit Committee. Our audit committee is a joint committee with Fidelity's
audit committee. Its responsibilities are generally to assist the board and
Fidelity's board in fulfilling their legal and fiduciary responsibilities
relating to accounting, audit and financial reporting policies and practices of
Bank Plus and its subsidiaries. The audit committee also, among other things,
recommends the engagement of our independent accountants to the board; monitors
and reviews the quality and activities of our internal audit function and those
of its independent accountants; and monitors the adequacy of our operating and
internal controls as reported by management, the independent accountants and
internal auditors. In 2000, the audit committee held five meetings. The Bank
Plus members of the joint audit committee are Mr. Indiek, Chairman, and Messrs.
Ellis and Susskind.
Compensation Committee. Our compensation committee is a joint committee
with Fidelity's compensation committee. It is authorized to review salaries and
compensation, including non-cash benefits, of directors, officers and other
employees of Bank Plus and its subsidiaries and to recommend to the board
salaries, remuneration and other forms of additional compensation and benefits
as it deems necessary. The joint compensation committee held five meetings in
2000. The Bank Plus members of the joint compensation committee are Mr.
Medearis, Chairman, and Messrs. Barker, King, and Smith.
Special Committee. On November 29, 2000, the boards of directors of Bank
Plus and Fidelity appointed a joint special committee. The initial purpose of
the special committee was to work with management in exploring strategic
alternatives for Bank Plus and Fidelity. As various alternatives developed, the
Special Committee gave direction to management and advice to the boards of
directors with regard to evaluating those alternatives and negotiating the terms
and conditions of proposed transactions. The special committee provided such
direction and advice with respect to the merger. The special committee met once
in 2000 and
60
66
numerous times in 2001. Bank Plus directors serving on the special committee are
Mr. Smith, Chairman, the members of the Executive Committee (Messrs. Beimler,
Mason, and Medearis), and Mr. Susskind.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the directors and executive
officers of Bank Plus and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of any
class of equity securities of Bank Plus registered pursuant to Section 12 of the
Exchange Act to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of their
equity securities of Bank Plus. These persons are required to furnish us with
copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Mr. Stoffers, who was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Credit
Officer of Fidelity in November 2000, filed his Form 3 on June 14, 2001.
Except for the foregoing, and based solely on its review of the copies of
such reports received by it during or with respect to the year ended December
31, 2000, and/or written representations from such reporting persons, we believe
that all reports required to be filed by such reporting persons during or with
respect to the year ended December 31, 2000 were timely filed.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The statements contained in this proxy statement or in documents
incorporated by reference herein with respect to Bank Plus that are not
historical facts are "forward-looking statements." Forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, statements containing the words "believes,"
"anticipates," "intends," "expects," "projects," "may," "estimates," "seek" or
"continue" and words of similar import. These forward-looking statements involve
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual
results, performance or achievements of Bank Plus or industry to be materially
different from any future results, performance or achievements contemplated,
projected, forecasted, estimated or budgeted in, or expressed or implied by,
projections and forward-looking statements.
The factors identified in this cautionary statement are important factors
(but not necessarily all the important factors) that could cause actual results
to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made
by, or on behalf of, Bank Plus. Where any such forward-looking statement
includes a statement of the assumptions or bases underlying such forward-looking
statement, Bank Plus cautions that, while it believes such assumptions or bases
to be reasonable and makes them in good faith, assumed facts or bases almost
always vary from actual results, and the differences between assumed facts or
bases and actual results can be material, depending on the circumstances. Where,
in any forward-looking statement, Bank Plus, or its management, expresses an
expectation or belief as to future results, such expectation or belief is
expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can
be no assurance that the statement of expectation or belief will result, or be
achieved or accomplished. Taking into account the foregoing, the following are
identified as important risk factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by, or on
behalf of, Bank Plus:
- a national or regional economic slowdown or recession which increases the
risk of defaults and credit losses;
- the impact of changes in the availability or price of electrical or other
forms of energy in our markets;
- movements in market interest rates that reduce our margins or the fair
value of the financial instruments Fidelity holds;
- restrictions imposed on Fidelity's operations by regulators such as a
prohibition on the payment of dividends to Bank Plus;
- failure of regulatory authorities to issue approvals or non-objection to
material transactions involving Fidelity;
- actions by Fidelity's regulators or other governmental agencies having
jurisdiction over Fidelity that could adversely affect Fidelity's
regulatory compliance status or capital levels;
61
67
- an increase in the number of customers seeking protection under the
bankruptcy laws which increases the amount of charge-offs;
- the effects of fraud or other contract breaches by third parties or
customers;
- the effectiveness of our collection efforts and the outcome of pending
and future litigation.
We assume no obligation to update any such factors or make any revisions to
any of the forward-looking statements or projections contained herein to reflect
actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting
such forward-looking statements or projections other than as required by law.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC. The annual reports include our audited financial
statements. You may read and copy any reports, statements or other information
that we file at the SEC's public reference rooms which are located at Room 1024,
Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, and at the
SEC's regional offices located at: Citicorp Center, 500 West Madison Street,
Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661 and Seven World Trade Center, 13th Floor,
New York, New York 10048. Copies of such materials are also available from the
Public Reference Section of the SEC at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington D.C.
20549 at prescribed rates. Copies of such materials may also be accessed through
the SEC Internet web site at http://www.sec.gov. Once the merger is completed,
we will no longer be subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act.
You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by
reference in this proxy statement to vote your shares of Bank Plus common stock
at the annual meeting.
This proxy statement is dated August 9, 2001. You should not assume that
the information contained in this proxy statement is accurate as of any date
other than such date, and the mailing of this proxy statement to stockholders
will not create any implication to the contrary.
62
68
ANNEX A -- AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
BY AND BETWEEN
BANK PLUS CORPORATION
AND
FBOP CORPORATION
JUNE 2, 2001
69
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<Table>
<Caption>
PAGE
----
ARTICLE I. DEFINED TERMS.................................... A-2
ARTICLE II. THE MERGER...................................... A-4
Section 2.1. Structure of the Merger.................... A-4
Section 2.2. Merger Consideration....................... A-4
Section 2.3. Payment and Exchange Procedures............ A-4
Section 2.4. The Closing................................ A-6
Section 2.5. Stock Options.............................. A-6
Section 2.6. Conversion of Shares of Dissenting Common
Stock.................................................. A-6
ARTICLE III. CONDUCT PENDING THE MERGER..................... A-7
Section 3.1. Conduct of the Company's Business Prior to
the Effective Time..................................... A-7
Section 3.2. Forbearance by the Company................. A-7
Section 3.3. Cooperation................................ A-10
Section 3.4. Conduct by Buyer Prior to the Effective
Time................................................... A-10
ARTICLE IV. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES.................. A-10
Section 4.1. Disclosure Schedules; Material Adverse
Effect................................................. A-10
Section 4.2. Representations and Warranties of the
Company................................................ A-11
Section 4.3. Representations and Warranties of Buyer.... A-18
ARTICLE V. COVENANTS........................................ A-19
Section 5.1. Acquisition Proposals...................... A-19
Section 5.2. Labor and Employment Matters............... A-20
Section 5.3. Access and Information..................... A-21
Section 5.4. Actions; Regulatory Matters................ A-21
Section 5.5. Publicity.................................. A-22
Section 5.6. Proxy Statement............................ A-22
Section 5.7. Stockholders' Meeting...................... A-22
Section 5.8. Notification of Certain Matters............ A-23
Section 5.9. Additional Agreements...................... A-23
Section 5.10. Filings.................................... A-23
Section 5.11. [Intentionally Omitted].................... A-23
Section 5.12. Accuracy of Information.................... A-23
Section 5.13. Indemnification and Insurance.............. A-23
ARTICLE VI. CONDITIONS TO CONSUMMATION...................... A-24
Section 6.1. Conditions to Each Party's Obligation...... A-24
Section 6.2. Conditions to the Obligation of Buyer...... A-25
Section 6.3. Conditions to the Obligation of the
Company................................................ A-25
ARTICLE VII. TERMINATION.................................... A-26
Section 7.1. Termination................................ A-26
Section 7.2. Effect of Breach or Termination............ A-27
Section 7.3. Expenses; Termination Fee.................. A-27
ARTICLE VIII. EFFECTIVE DATE AND EFFECTIVE TIME............. A-28
Section 8.1. Effective Date and Effective Time.......... A-28
</Table>
A-i
70
<Table>
<Caption>
PAGE
----
ARTICLE IX. OTHER MATTERS................................... A-29
Section 9.1. Interpretation............................. A-29
Section 9.2. Waiver..................................... A-29
Section 9.3. Counterparts............................... A-29
Section 9.4. Governing Law.............................. A-29
Section 9.5. Notices.................................... A-29
Section 9.6. Entire Agreement; Binding Agreement; Third
Parties................................................ A-30
Section 9.7. Assignment................................. A-30
Section 9.8. Captions................................... A-30
Section 9.9. Construction of Agreement.................. A-30
Section 9.10. Survival................................... A-31
Section 9.11. Attorneys' Fees............................ A-31
Section 9.12. Knowledge.................................. A-31
</Table>
A-ii
71
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, dated as of June 2, 2001 (this "Agreement"),
by and between BANK PLUS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
and FBOP Corporation, an Illinois corporation (the "Buyer").
RECITALS:
A. The Company is the parent of Fidelity Federal Bank, a federal savings
bank (the "Bank"), and Buyer is a bank and thrift holding company.
B. The Boards of Directors of the Company, the Bank and Buyer have
determined that it is advisable and in the best interests of their respective
stockholders for such entities to enter into a business combination upon the
terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein.
C. In furtherance of such combination, the respective Boards of Directors
of the Company and Buyer have duly approved this Agreement, its execution and
delivery, and the merger (the "Merger") of Buyer's wholly-owned subsidiary (the
"Acquisition Sub") with and into the Company upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth herein, and may thereafter cause the acquisition of the
Bank by a financial institution subsidiary of Buyer (the "Financial Institution
Sub") by means of a merger of the Bank with and into the Financial Institution
Sub.
D. Concurrently with the execution and delivery hereof, the Chairman of
the Board and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company have delivered to Buyer
their agreements to vote their shares of Common Stock of the Company in favor of
the Merger at the meeting of stockholders of the Company.
A-1
72
AGREEMENT:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises and obligations
hereunder, the parties hereto adopt and make this Agreement and prescribe the
terms and conditions hereof and the manner and basis of carrying it into effect,
which shall be as follows:
ARTICLE I.
DEFINED TERMS
SECTION 1.1. The following is a list of defined terms used in this
Agreement and references to the Section and page numbers hereof in which such
terms are defined:
<Table>
<Caption>
DEFINED TERM SECTION PAGE
- ------------ ------- ----
15% Stockholder........................ 4.2....................................... 19
Acquisition Proposal................... 5.1....................................... 24
Acquisition Sub........................ Recitals.................................. 1
Agreement.............................. Preamble.................................. 1
Applicable Laws........................ 4.2....................................... 17
Bank Merger............................ Recitals.................................. 1
Bank................................... Recitals.................................. 1
Buyer Disclosure Schedule.............. 4.1....................................... 12
Buyer Financial Statements............. 4.3(f).................................... 23
Buyer Policy........................... 5.14(b)................................... 29
Buyer Regulatory Authorities........... 4.3....................................... 22
Buyer.................................. Preamble.................................. 1
Certificate of Merger.................. 2.1....................................... 3
Certificate............................ 2.3....................................... 4
Closing Date........................... 2.4....................................... 6
Closing................................ 2.4....................................... 6
Code................................... 2.3....................................... 6
Company Board.......................... 4.2....................................... 14
Company Common Stock................... 4.2....................................... 13
Company D&O Insurance.................. 5.14(b)................................... 29
Company Filings........................ 4.2....................................... 15
Company Preferred Stock................ 4.2....................................... 13
Company Stock Plan..................... 2.5....................................... 6
Company Stock.......................... 4.2....................................... 13
Company................................ Preamble.................................. 1
Confidentiality Agreement.............. 5.3....................................... 26
Costs.................................. 5.14(a)................................... 29
Covered Persons........................ 5.14(b)................................... 29
Delaware Secretary..................... 2.1....................................... 3
DGCL................................... 2.1....................................... 3
Disclosure Schedule.................... 4.1....................................... 12
Dissenting Shares...................... 2.6....................................... 7
DOJ.................................... 4.2....................................... 14
Effective Date......................... 8.1....................................... 36
Effective Time......................... 8.1....................................... 36
Environmental Laws..................... 4.2....................................... 19
</Table>
A-2
73
<Table>
<Caption>
DEFINED TERM SECTION PAGE
- ------------ ------- ----
Escrow Account......................... 2.2....................................... 4
Escrow Agent........................... 2.2....................................... 4
Escrow Agreement....................... 2.2....................................... 4
Escrowed Funds......................... 2.2....................................... 4
Fairness Opinion....................... 4.2....................................... 14
FDIC................................... 4.2....................................... 13
Financial Institution Sub.............. Recitals.................................. 1
FTC.................................... 4.2....................................... 14
GAAP................................... 3.2....................................... 10
Governmental Authority................. 3.5....................................... 12
HOLA................................... 4.2....................................... 12
Indemnification Provisions............. 5.14(a)................................... 29
Indemnified Party...................... 5.14(a)................................... 29
Liens.................................. 4.2....................................... 14
Material Adverse Effect................ 4.1....................................... 12
Material Contracts..................... 4.2....................................... 17
Merger Consideration................... 2.3....................................... 4
Merger................................. Recitals.................................. 1
NASD................................... 4.2....................................... 14
Option Consideration................... 2.5....................................... 6
Optionholders.......................... 2.3....................................... 4
Options................................ 2.5....................................... 6
Paying Agent........................... 2.3....................................... 4
Per Share Merger Consideration......... 2.2....................................... 4
Person................................. 4.2....................................... 19
Proxy Statement........................ 5.6....................................... 27
Regulatory Authorities................. 4.2....................................... 16
Requisite Regulatory Approvals......... 6.1....................................... 30
Rights Agreement....................... 4.2....................................... 19
Rights................................. 4.2....................................... 13
SEC.................................... 4.2....................................... 14
Significant Matters.................... 6.2(g).................................... 12
State Regulator........................ 5.8....................................... 28
Stockholders........................... 2.3....................................... 4
subsidiary............................. 3.1....................................... 8
Superior Proposal...................... 5.1....................................... 24
Surviving Company...................... 2.1....................................... 3
Tax Returns............................ 4.2....................................... 21
Tax.................................... 4.2....................................... 20
Taxes.................................. 4.2....................................... 20
Termination Date....................... 7.1....................................... 33
Termination Fee........................ 7.3....................................... 35
</Table>
A-3
74
ARTICLE II.
THE MERGER
SECTION 2.1. Structure of the Merger.
(a) At the Effective Time (as defined below), subject to the satisfaction
or waiver of the conditions set forth in Article VI, Acquisition Sub will merge
with and into the Company, with the Company being the surviving company in the
Merger (the "Surviving Company"), pursuant to the provisions of, and with the
effect provided in, the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "DGCL"). The
Merger shall be effected by the filing in the office of the Secretary of State
of Delaware (the "Delaware Secretary") of a certificate of merger (the
"Certificate of Merger") in accordance with the DGCL. The separate corporate
existence of Acquisition Sub shall thereupon cease. The name of the Surviving
Company shall be Bank Plus Corporation.
(b) At the Effective Time, (i) the charter of the Surviving Corporation
shall be amended to read as set forth on Exhibit A to the Certificate of Merger
and (ii) the bylaws of Acquisition Sub in effect immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall become the bylaws of the Surviving Company.
(c) At the Effective Time, the directors and officers of Acquisition Sub
shall become the directors and officers of the Surviving Company.
SECTION 2.2. Merger Consideration.
(a) By virtue of the Merger, automatically and without any action on the
part of the Stockholders (as defined below), (i) each share of Company Common
Stock (as defined below) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time (other than shares as to which dissenters' rights are perfected
under Section 262 of the DGCL and any shares of Company Common Stock that are
owned by the Company or any direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company) shall become and be converted into the right to receive, in immediately
available funds, the Per Share Merger Consideration (as defined below), (ii)
each share of common stock of Acquisition Sub issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the Effective Time shall become and be converted into one share of
common stock of the Surviving Company and (iii) each share of Company Common
Stock owned by the Company or any direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
the Company shall be retired and canceled and no cash or other consideration
shall be issued with respect thereto. For purposes of Section 2.2, "Per Share
Merger Consideration" shall equal the sum of Seven Dollars and Twenty-Five Cents
($7.25) subject to increase pursuant to the last sentence of Section 7.1(g).
(b) Buyer will deposit the sum of $5,000,000 (together with the additional
sums that Buyer deposits pursuant to Section 7.1(g) and interest accrued or
other earnings thereon, the "Escrowed Funds") with an escrow agent reasonably
acceptable to Buyer and the Company (the "Escrow Agent") into an escrow account
(the "Escrow Account") on or before three (3) business days after the date of
this Agreement pursuant to the terms of the Escrow Agreement attached hereto as
Exhibit 2.2(b) subject to such changes as the Escrow Agent may reasonably
request (the "Escrow Agreement"). The amount of the Escrowed Funds shall be
delivered to the Paying Agent three (3) business days before the Effective Time
unless previously paid to the Company pursuant to Section 7.1(g) of this
Agreement.
SECTION 2.3. Payment and Exchange Procedures.
(a) At and after the Effective Time, each certificate (each a
"Certificate") previously representing shares of Company Common Stock (other
than Certificates representing Dissenting Shares (as defined below)) shall
represent only the right to receive the Per Share Merger Consideration in
respect of the number of shares represented by such certificate.
(b) As of the Effective Time, Buyer shall have deposited, or caused to be
deposited, with American Stock Transfer & Company (the "Paying Agent") (i) for
the benefit of the holders of shares of Company Common Stock ("Stockholders"),
for payment in accordance with this Section 2.3, the Per Share Merger
Consideration multiplied by the total number of outstanding shares of Company
Common Stock and (ii) for the benefit of holders of Options ("Optionholders"),
for payment in accordance with Section 2.5, the aggregate Option Consideration
(together with the amount described in (i), the "Merger Consideration").
A-4
75
The amount of the Escrowed Funds delivered by the Escrow Agent to the Paying
Agent pursuant to Section 2.2(b) shall be deemed deposited by the Buyer with the
Paying Agent under this Section 2.3(b).
(c) As soon as practicable after the Effective Time, but in any event
within three business days following the Effective Time, Buyer shall cause the
Paying Agent to:
(i) mail to each holder of record of a Certificate or Certificates the
following: (A) a letter of transmittal specifying that delivery shall be
effected, and risk of loss and title to the Certificates shall pass, only
upon delivery of the Certificates to the Paying Agent, which shall be in a
form and contain any other reasonable provisions as Buyer may determine;
and (B) instructions for use in effecting the surrender of the Certificates
in exchange for the applicable portion of the Merger Consideration. Upon
the proper surrender of a Certificate to the Paying Agent, together with a
properly completed and duly executed letter of transmittal, the holder of
such Certificate shall be entitled to receive in exchange therefor the
portion of the Merger Consideration which such holder has the right to
receive in respect of the Certificate surrendered pursuant to the
provisions hereof and the Certificate so surrendered shall forthwith be
cancelled. In the event of a transfer of ownership of any shares of Company
Common Stock not registered in the transfer records of the Company, the
applicable portion of the Merger Consideration may be issued to the
transferee if the Certificate representing such Company Common Stock is
presented to the Paying Agent, accompanied by documents sufficient, in the
reasonable discretion of Buyer and the Paying Agent, (1) to evidence and
effect such transfer and (2) to evidence that all applicable stock transfer
taxes have been paid; and
(ii) deliver to each Optionholder listed on a schedule to be provided
by the Company to Buyer and the Paying Agent on or before the Effective
Time the Option Consideration set forth next to such Optionholder's name on
such schedule in accordance with Section 2.5, against such documents as the
Company may reasonably determine.
(d) From and after the Effective Time, there shall be no transfers on the
stock transfer records of the Company of any shares of Company Common Stock that
were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. If, after the
Effective Time, certificates are presented to Buyer or the Surviving Company,
such Certificates shall be canceled and exchanged for the portion of the Merger
Consideration deliverable in respect thereof pursuant to this Agreement in
accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 2.3.
(e) Any portion of the aggregate Merger Consideration that remains
unclaimed for one year after the Effective Time shall be delivered by the Paying
Agent to Buyer. Any Stockholders or Optionholders who have not theretofore
complied with this Section 2.3 shall thereafter look only to Buyer for payment
of their Merger Consideration deliverable in respect of each share of Company
Common Stock or Option held by such person as determined pursuant to this
Agreement. If outstanding Certificates are not surrendered or payments hereunder
not claimed prior to the date on which such payments would otherwise escheat to
or become the property of any governmental unit or agency, the unclaimed items
shall, to the extent permitted by abandoned property and any other Applicable
Law (as defined below), become the property of Buyer (and to the extent not in
its possession shall be paid over to it), free and clear of all claims or
interest of any Person (as defined below) previously entitled to such claims.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the fullest extent permitted by Applicable
Law, none of Buyer, the Surviving Company, the Paying Agent or any other Person
shall be liable to any former Stockholder or Optionholder for any amount
delivered to a public official pursuant to applicable abandoned property,
escheat or similar laws.
(f) In the event any Certificate shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed,
upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the Person claiming such
Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed and, if required by the Paying
Agent, the posting by such Person of a bond in such amount as the Paying Agent
may reasonably direct as indemnity against any claim that may be made against it
with respect to such Certificate, the Paying Agent will pay in exchange for such
lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate the portion of the Merger Consideration
deliverable in respect thereof pursuant to this Agreement.
(g) Buyer or the Surviving Company shall be entitled to deduct and withhold
from the portion of the Merger Consideration otherwise payable pursuant to this
Agreement to any Stockholder or Optionholder such
A-5
76
amounts as Buyer or the Surviving Company is required to deduct and withhold
with respect to the making of such payment under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the "Code"), or any provision of state, local or foreign tax
law.
(h) The Per Share Merger Consideration shall be adjusted proportionately
for any stock splits, stock dividends, subdivisions, reclassifications or any
other combinations, divisions or similar change in the Company's capitalization
after the date hereof and which occurs or which has a record date prior to the
Effective Time of the Merger. If shares of Company Common Stock are issued
pursuant to the Rights Agreement, then (i) the Per Share Merger Consideration
shall be adjusted as follows: the sum of: (A) the aggregate Per Share Merger
Consideration payable in respect of all shares of Company Common Stock
outstanding immediately prior to such issuances plus (B) the amount of any
monetary consideration received by the Company in respect of such issuances,
shall be divided by the number of shares of Company Common Stock outstanding
after such issuances to arrive at the adjusted Per Share Merger Consideration,
and (ii) the Option Consideration shall be appropriately adjusted by the number
of shares of Company Common Stock issuable upon exercise of all Options after
giving effect to the issuance of shares of Company Common Stock pursuant to the
Rights Agreement (such that each Optionholder shall receive not less than what
such Optionholder would have received prior to the issuance of such shares
pursuant to the Rights Agreement).
SECTION 2.4. The Closing. Upon satisfaction or satisfactory waiver of all
conditions set forth in Article VI of this Agreement, the closing (the
"Closing") of the Merger shall take place at the offices of Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher, 333 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90071 at 9:00 a.m. on
the Effective Date, or such other place, time and date as Buyer and the Company
may mutually agree (the "Closing Date").
SECTION 2.5. Stock Options. The Company shall take appropriate action such
that at the Effective Time each option, warrant or other right granted pursuant
to the Company's Stock Option and Equity Incentive Plan (the "Company Stock
Plan") that is outstanding and unexercised immediately prior to the Effective
Time ("Options") shall be canceled by the Company in consideration of the right
to receive payment pursuant to Section 2.3(c)(ii) by each such Optionholder of
an aggregate amount in cash equal to the positive difference, if any, of (a) the
product of (i) the Per Share Merger Consideration multiplied by (ii) the number
of shares of Company Common Stock as to which such Option is exercisable, minus
(b) the aggregate exercise price of such Option (such positive difference, the
"Option Consideration"). The foregoing calculation shall be made independently
for each agreement granting an Option and, to the extent that the exercise price
of any Option is greater than the Per Share Merger Consideration, the Option
Consideration payable on account of another Option agreement shall not be offset
thereby. At the Effective Time, each Option and the Company Stock Plan shall
terminate and be of no further force or effect, and any rights thereunder to
purchase shares of Company Common Stock shall also terminate and be of no
further force or effect.
SECTION 2.6. Conversion of Shares of Dissenting Common Stock. The Company
shall give Buyer prompt notice upon receipt by the Company of any written
demands for appraisal rights, withdrawal of such demands and any other documents
received or instruments served pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL and shall
give Buyer the opportunity to direct all negotiations and proceedings with
respect to such demands. The Company shall not voluntarily make any payment with
respect to such demands for appraisal rights and shall not, except with the
prior written consent of Buyer, settle or offer to settle such demands. If any
holders of shares of Company Common Stock dissent from the Merger and exercise
and perfect the right to obtain valuation of and payment for their shares of
Company Common Stock (the "Dissenting Shares") under the provisions of said
Section, then (a) the Dissenting Shares will be deemed for all purposes to have
been retired and canceled automatically immediately prior to the consummation of
the Merger, with the effect that such shares will not be exchanged for the
Merger Consideration pursuant to Section 2.2 hereof and (b) all payments to be
made to the holders of such Dissenting Shares will be made directly by Buyer.
A-6
77
ARTICLE III.
CONDUCT PENDING THE MERGER
SECTION 3.1. Conduct of the Company's Business Prior to the Effective
Time. During the period from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time,
and except as (a) contemplated by this Agreement, (b) required by Applicable
Law, (c) necessary to be consistent with prudent banking practice or (d) set
forth on Section 3.1 of the Company Disclosure Schedule (as defined below), the
Company shall, and shall cause each of its subsidiaries (as defined below) to,
unless Buyer shall give its prior written consent (which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed and shall in any event be deemed to have been
given if, within five (5) business days after receipt by Buyer of a written
notice from the Company of the Company's intention to act contrary to any one of
the covenants set forth in this Section 3.1, Buyer shall not have given written
notice to the Company of Buyer's objection to such action):
(i) conduct its business and maintain its books and records in the
usual, regular and ordinary course in all material respects, in conformity
with (A) prudent banking practice, (B) any orders or directives issued by
the Office of Thrift Supervision ("OTS") as in effect on the date hereof,
copies of which have been made available to Buyer and (C) Applicable Law,
except for any failure to comply with any such Applicable Law that would
not have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company (as defined below);
(ii) use commercially reasonable efforts consistent with this
Agreement to maintain and preserve intact its present business organization
and to maintain and preserve its relationships and goodwill with account
holders, borrowers, employees and others having business relationships with
the Company or its subsidiaries;
(iii) use commercially reasonable efforts to keep in full force and
effect all of its material permits and licenses;
(iv) use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain insurance
coverage at least substantially equivalent to that now in effect on its
business operations and all properties which it owns or leases;
(v) perform its material contractual obligations and not become in
material default on any such obligations, except where the failure to
perform such obligations or where being in such default would not have a
Material Adverse Effect on the Company;
(vi) maintain its assets and properties in good condition and repair,
except for normal wear and tear and for changes in the ordinary course of
business, consistent with past practice;
(vii) promptly notify Buyer regarding receipt from any tax authority
of any notification of (A) the commencement of an audit, (B) a request to
extend the statute of limitations, (C) a statutory notice of deficiency,
(D) a revenue agent's report, (E) a proposed assessment, (F) any other
similar notification of potential adjustments or (G) any collection
enforcement activity by any tax authority with respect to tax liabilities
of the Company, or any of its subsidiaries; and
(viii) make available to Buyer monthly unaudited consolidated balance
sheets and consolidated income statements of the Company within twenty-five
(25) days after the close of each calendar month.
As used in this Agreement, the word "subsidiary" when used with respect to
any party means any corporation, partnership or other organization, whether
incorporated or unincorporated, which is consolidated with such party for
financial reporting purposes. Unless the context otherwise so requires, any
reference to the subsidiaries of the Company is deemed to include the Bank and
its subsidiaries.
SECTION 3.2. Forbearance by the Company. During the period from the date of
this Agreement to the Effective Time, and except as (a) contemplated by this
Agreement, (b) required by Applicable Law, (c) necessary to be consistent with
prudent banking practice or (d) set forth in Section 3.2 of the Company
Disclosure Schedule, the Company shall not, and shall not permit any of its
subsidiaries to, without the prior written consent of Buyer (which consent shall
not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, and shall in any event be deemed to
have been given if, within five (5) business days (or in the case of Section
3.2(ix) below, two (2) business days) after receipt by Buyer of a written notice
from the Company of the Company's intention to
A-7
78
act contrary to any one of the covenants set forth in this Section 3.2, Buyer
shall not have given written notice to the Company of Buyer's objection to such
action), do any of the following:
(i) other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice, incur any indebtedness for borrowed money or assume, guarantee,
endorse or otherwise as an accommodation become responsible for the
obligations of any other Person other than overnight borrowings from the
Federal Home Loan Bank and federal funds purchased or securities sold under
agreements to repurchase;
(ii) change the number of shares of its authorized or issued capital
stock or issue, grant or amend any option, warrant, call, commitment,
subscription, right to purchase or agreement of any character relating to
the authorized or issued capital stock of the Company or its subsidiaries,
or any securities convertible into shares of any such stock, or split,
combine or reclassify any shares of its capital stock, or declare, set
aside or pay any dividend, or other distributions (whether in cash, stock
or property or any combination thereof) in respect of the capital stock of
the Company or redeem or purchase or otherwise acquire any shares of such
capital stock or any securities or obligations convertible into or
exchangeable for any shares of its capital stock, or liquidate, sell,
transfer, assign, encumber or otherwise dispose of any shares of capital
stock of the Company or its subsidiaries, except for (i) the Company's
issuance of (A) Company Common Stock pursuant to the Company Stock Plan and
(B) Company Stock pursuant to the Rights (as defined in Section 4.2(b)) and
(ii) the amendment of the terms of the Bank Preferred Stock to provide that
the shares of Bank Preferred Stock will be converted at or prior to the
consummation of the Merger into the right to receive cash. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary, subject to Applicable Law, the Bank can pay
quarterly dividends of $1,304,100 on its preferred stock and $250,000 on
its common stock and any other wholly-owned subsidiaries may pay dividends
to the Company;
(iii) other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice, sell, transfer, mortgage, encumber or otherwise dispose of
any of its material properties, leases or assets to any Person, or cancel,
release or assign any material indebtedness of any Person, except pursuant
to contracts or agreements in force at the date of this Agreement and
except in connection with any loan workouts;
(iv) enter into, renew or amend any employment agreement with any
employee or director, voluntarily accelerate the vesting of any
compensation or benefit or increase, in any manner, the compensation or
fringe benefits of any of its employees or directors (except normal
increases and discretionary performance bonuses, in the ordinary course of
business, consistent with past practices of the Company, or additional
retention arrangements, not to exceed $500,000 in the aggregate, for
employees ranking below the rank of Executive Vice President), or create or
institute, or make any payments pursuant to, any severance plan, bonus
plan, incentive compensation plan or package, or pay any pension or
retirement allowance not required by any existing plan or agreement to any
such employees or directors, or become a party to, amend or commit itself
to, or otherwise establish any trust or account related to, any Plan (as
defined below), with or for the benefit of any employee, other than any
amendment to any Plan required by Applicable Law (provided that the Company
shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to minimize the cost of any
such amendment as permitted under such Applicable Law);
(v) other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice, make any investment either by purchase of stock or securities,
contributions to capital, property transfers or purchase of any property or
assets of any Person; provided, however, that no investment or series of
related investments shall be made in an amount in excess of $100,000 except
for (A) securities which would be reported under the caption "cash and cash
equivalents" on the Company's consolidated statement of financial
condition, (B) investment-grade mortgage-backed securities having the
rating of AAA from either Standard & Poor's Corporation or Moody's
Investors Service, Inc., (C) securities issued by the Federal National
Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the
Government National Mortgage Association or (D) foreclosures or
acquisitions in satisfaction of debts outstanding to the Company or its
subsidiaries; provided further, however, that in no event shall the Company
or any of
A-8
79
its subsidiaries make any acquisition of equity securities or business
operations without Buyer's prior written consent;
(vi) enter into, renew, terminate or materially amend any material
contract or agreement, or make any material change in any of its material
contracts or agreements, other than any: (A) loan or deposit agreements
made in the ordinary course of business or (B) contract or other agreement
involving aggregate payments of $100,000 or less per annum;
(vii) settle any claim, action or proceeding involving any liability
of the Company or any of its subsidiaries for money damages in excess of
$100,000, exclusive of contributions from insurers, or involving material
restrictions upon the business or operations of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries, other than settlements of any Significant Matters (as defined
below) set forth on Section 4.1(b) of the Company Disclosure Schedule in an
aggregate amount not to exceed $5,000,000;
(viii) except in the ordinary course of business (including in
connection with any loan work-outs), waive or release any material right or
collateral or cancel or compromise any extension of credit or other debt or
claim;
(ix) make, renegotiate, renew, increase, extend or purchase any loan,
lease (credit equivalent), advance, credit enhancement or other extension
of credit, or make any commitment in respect of any of the foregoing,
except for (A) loans, advances or commitments in each instance in amounts
(exclusive of participations by third parties) less than $4,000,000, if
secured by real estate, or $25,000, if unsecured, or (B) loans made
pursuant to commitments made by the Company prior to the date hereof;
(x) change its method of accounting as in effect at December 31, 2000,
except as required by changes in generally accepted accounting principles
("GAAP") as concurred in by the Company's independent auditors, or as
required by regulatory accounting principles, regulatory requirements or
Applicable Laws;
(xi) enter into any new lines of business materially different from
the lines of business that they conduct on the date hereof, or cease to
conduct any material lines of business that it conducts on the date hereof,
or conduct any material business activity not consistent with past
practice;
(xii) amend its charter, bylaws or other similar governing documents;
(xiii) make any capital expenditure which exceeds (A) $100,000 per
project or related series of projects or (B) $500,000 in the aggregate;
(xiv) grant or commit to grant any extension of credit or amend the
terms of any such credit outstanding on the date hereof to any executive
officer, director or holder of ten percent (10%) or more of the outstanding
Company Common Stock, or any affiliate of such Person, if such credit would
exceed $100,000 (other than in the ordinary course, consistent with past
practice, including pursuant to the Bank's existing employee home loan
program);
(xv) materially change any of the Company's or the Bank's basic
policies and practices or any other material aspect of the Company's
business or operations on a consolidated basis;
(xvi) grant any Person a power of attorney or similar authority, other
than in the ordinary course of business;
(xvii) take title to any non-residential real property without
obtaining a prior Phase I environmental report;
(xviii) execute Form 870-AD or comparable document agreeing to the
finality of any audit, examination or other proceeding with respect to any
federal or state income tax liability of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries;
(xix) merge or consolidate with any other Person or acquire any
capital stock of or other equity interest in any Person or create any
subsidiary;
A-9
80
(xx) make application for the opening, relocation or closing of any,
or open, relocate or close any, branches, except the sale of the Mall of
America branch and the closing of the Corona Del Mar branch;
(xxi) sell or enter into any agreement to sell any credit card
receivables (including, but not limited to, charged-off accounts);
(xxii) engage or participate in any material transaction or incur or
sustain any material obligation not in the ordinary course of business; or
(xxiii) agree to, or make any commitment to, take any of the actions
prohibited by this Section 3.2.
SECTION 3.3. Cooperation. Except in any case as may be required by
Applicable Law or the provisions of this Agreement, each of the Company,
Acquisition Sub and Buyer shall not take, cause to be taken or agree or make any
commitment to take any action: (a) that is intended or may reasonably be
expected to cause any of its representations or warranties set forth in Article
IV hereof not to be true and correct or (b) that is inconsistent with or
prohibited by Article III.
SECTION 3.4. Conduct by Buyer Prior to the Effective Time. Except as
expressly provided in this Agreement, during the period from the date of this
Agreement to the Effective Time, Buyer shall (a) promptly (and in any event
prior to the mailing of the Proxy Statement (as defined below)), form
Acquisition Sub as a Delaware corporation and qualify Acquisition Sub in any
jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware in which qualification is
necessary or advisable in order to consummate the Merger and cause it to become
a party hereto, (b) in a timely manner, cause Acquisition Sub to take all
actions necessary or appropriate to effect or facilitate the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, (c) except as required by Applicable Law, not
take any action which would reasonably be expected to adversely affect or delay
the ability of Buyer, Acquisition Sub or the Company to obtain any necessary
approvals, consents or waivers of any court, administrative agency, commission
or other federal, state or local governmental authority or instrumentality
(each, a "Governmental Authority") required for the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement or to perform its covenants or agreements on a timely basis under
this Agreement and (d) not agree to, or make any commitment to, take any of the
actions prohibited by this Section 3.4.
ARTICLE IV.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
SECTION 4.1. Disclosure Schedules; Material Adverse Effect.
(a) On or prior to the date hereof, Buyer has delivered to the Company a
schedule (the "Buyer Disclosure Schedule") and the Company has delivered to
Buyer a schedule (the "Company Disclosure Schedule") setting forth, among other
things, items the disclosure of which is necessary or appropriate either in
response to an express disclosure requirement contained in a provision hereof or
as an exception to one or more representations or warranties contained in
Section 4.2 or 4.3 or to one or more of its covenants contained in Article III
or V; provided, that the mere inclusion of an item in the Buyer Disclosure
Schedule or the Company Disclosure Schedule shall not be deemed an admission by
a party that such item was required to be disclosed therein or was otherwise
material. Any item disclosed on a party's Disclosure Schedule with respect to
one or more provisions of this Agreement shall (unless otherwise indicated) also
be deemed to be disclosed with respect to any other provision of this Agreement
to the extent necessary to prevent a breach of any representation, warranty or
covenant made by such party in such other provision.
(b) As used in this Agreement, the term "Material Adverse Effect" means an
effect that (i) is material and adverse to the business, financial condition or
results of operations of the relevant party hereto and its subsidiaries taken as
a whole or (ii) is material and adverse to the ability of the relevant party to
consummate the Merger or to perform its material obligations hereunder;
provided, however, that a Material Adverse Effect shall not be deemed to have
occurred as a result of any (A) changes in general or regional economic
conditions (including interest rates), (B) acts or omissions permitted or
contemplated hereby or taken with the prior written consent or upon the written
request of the other party hereunder or (C) changes in Applicable Law or GAAP;
(D) any settlement payments or judgments aggregating up to $5 million resulting
A-10
81
from the litigation or arbitration matters identified on Section 4.1(b) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule as "Significant Matters;" (E) the pendency of any of
the Significant Matters at the Effective Time of the Merger; or (F) reasonable
costs and expenses incurred by the Company or the Bank in transactions outside
the ordinary course of business contemplated by this Agreement.
SECTION 4.2. Representations and Warranties of the Company. Subject to
Section 4.1 and except as disclosed in the Company Disclosure Schedule, the
Company hereby represents and warrants to Buyer as follows:
(a) Organization and Standing. The Company is a corporation duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the
State of Delaware and is registered as a savings and loan holding company
under the Home Owners Loan Act of 1933, as amended, and applicable
regulations thereunder ("HOLA"). The Bank is a federal savings bank duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the
United States and is authorized by the OTS to conduct a federal savings
bank business. The Bank is a member in good standing of the Federal Home
Loan Bank of San Francisco. Each of the Company's subsidiaries is duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the
jurisdiction of its organization. The Certificate of Incorporation,
Articles of Incorporation or Federal Stock Charter, as applicable, and
bylaws of each of the Company and its subsidiaries, all as amended to date,
are in full force and effect. The Bank's deposits are insured by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC") in the manner and to the
fullest extent provided by law. Neither the scope of the business of the
Company or any of its subsidiaries, nor the location of any of their
respective properties requires that the Company or any of its subsidiaries
be qualified or licensed to do business in any jurisdiction other than the
States of California and Minnesota where the failure to be so qualified or
licensed would, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse
Effect.
(b) Company Stock. As of the date hereof, the authorized capital stock
of the Company consists solely of (i) 78,500,000 shares of the Company's
common stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Company Common Stock"), of which
19,476,696 shares are outstanding, and (ii) 10,000,000 shares of the
Company's preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Company Preferred
Stock," and together with Company Common Stock, "Company Stock"), of which
none are outstanding. Up to an additional 1,783,000 shares of Company
Common Stock may be issued upon exercise or conversion of outstanding
Rights (as defined below). As of the date hereof, no shares of Company
Common Stock and no shares of Company Preferred Stock were held in treasury
by the Company or otherwise owned by the Company or its subsidiaries. The
outstanding shares of Company Common Stock have been validly issued and are
fully paid and nonassessable (subject to statutory obligations of holders,
if any) and subject to no preemptive rights. Section 4.2(b)(i) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth, as of the date hereof, all shares
of Company Stock reserved for issuance, outstanding options, calls or
commitments relating to shares of Company Stock or any outstanding
securities, obligations or agreements convertible into or exchangeable for,
or giving any Person any right (including, without limitation, preemptive
rights) to subscribe for or acquire, any shares of Company Stock
(collectively, "Rights").
(c) Subsidiaries.
(i) (A) Section 4.2(c) of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets
forth a complete list of all of the direct and indirect subsidiaries of
the Company, together with the jurisdiction of organization of each such
subsidiary, the authorized shares of capital stock, and the number of
shares of capital stock outstanding, and, to the extent owned by the
Company or one of its subsidiaries, what entity owns such stock; (B) the
Company owns, directly or indirectly, all the issued and outstanding
securities of each of its subsidiaries; (C) no equity securities of any
of its subsidiaries are or may become required to be issued (other than
to the Company or its subsidiaries) by reason of any option, call,
commitment, convertible security or otherwise; (D) there are no
contracts, commitments, understandings, or arrangements relating to
rights of the Company or any of its subsidiaries to vote or to dispose
of such securities; and (E) all the securities of each subsidiary held
by the Company or its subsidiaries have been validly issued and are
fully paid and nonassessable (subject to statutory obligations of
holders, if any) and are owned by the Company or its subsidiaries free
and
A-11
82
clear of any charge, mortgage, pledge, security interest, restriction,
claim, lien, or encumbrance (excluding restrictions imposed by
Applicable Law) (collectively, "Liens"). Each subsidiary is an
investment permitted pursuant to HOLA for a unitary savings and loan
holding company and, for those subsidiaries owned by the Bank, for a
federal savings association or its subsidiaries.
(ii) The Company does not own, beneficially, directly or
indirectly, any equity securities or similar interests of any Person
(other than in a fiduciary capacity or in connection with the
foreclosure of security interests or as a result of similar enforcement
remedies in connection with loans made in the ordinary course of
business), or any interest in a partnership or joint venture of any
kind, other than in its subsidiaries. Except for its ownership of the
Bank, the Company does not own any stock or equity interest in any
depository institution (as defined in 12 U.S.C. sec.1813(c)(1)).
(d) Powers. The Company and each of its subsidiaries has the corporate
or trust power and authority to carry on their respective businesses as
they are now being conducted and to own all their properties and assets.
The Company has the corporate power and authority to execute, deliver and
perform its obligations under this Agreement and to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby.
(e) Corporate Authority. Subject to receipt of the requisite approval
of the Merger and this Agreement by the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of the Company Common Stock entitled to vote thereon
(which are the only stockholder votes required thereon with respect to the
Company), this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby have been
duly authorized by all necessary corporate action of the Company on or
prior to the date hereof. This Agreement is, and the Certificate of Merger
will be, upon due execution and delivery by the respective parties thereto,
valid and legally binding obligations of the Company, enforceable in
accordance with their respective terms, except as enforceability may be
limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium,
fraudulent transfer and similar laws of general applicability relating to
or affecting creditors' rights or by general equity principles. The
Company's Board of Directors (the "Company Board") has directed that this
Agreement and the transactions hereby be submitted to the Stockholders for
approval (within the meaning of Section 251 of the DGCL) at a meeting of
such Stockholders. The Company Board has received the written opinion of
Sandler O'Neill to the effect that, as of the date hereof, the Merger
Consideration is fair to the holders of Company Common Stock from a
financial point of view (the "Fairness Opinion").
(f) Approvals; No Defaults.
(i) No consents or approvals of, or filings or registrations with,
any Governmental Authority are required to be made or obtained by the
Company or any of its subsidiaries in connection with the execution,
delivery or performance by the Company of this Agreement or to
consummate the Merger, except for (A) filings and approvals of
applications with and by the OTS, the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. (the "NASD"), the Department of Justice (the "DOJ"), the
Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC") and the
FDIC, (B) filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"SEC") and state securities authorities, and (C) the filing of the
Certificate of Merger with the Delaware Secretary pursuant to the DGCL.
(ii) Subject to receipt of the regulatory approvals referred to in
the preceding paragraph, expiration of related waiting periods and
required filings under federal and state securities laws, the execution,
delivery and performance of this Agreement and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby do not and will not (A) constitute a
breach or violation of, or a default under, or give rise to any Lien,
any acceleration of remedies or any right of termination or cancellation
under, any law, rule or regulation or any judgment, decree, writ,
injunction, statute, order, governmental permit or license, or note,
bond, mortgage, agreement, indenture or instrument of the Company or any
of its subsidiaries or to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries
or properties or assets is subject or bound, (B) constitute a breach or
violation of, or a default under, the Company's or the Bank's charter or
bylaws or (C) require any consent or approval under any such law, rule,
regulation, judgment, decree, writ, injunction, statute, order,
governmental permit or license, note, bond, mortgage, agreement,
indenture or instrument, except in each case, for such matters as would
A-12
83
not constitute a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. To the
knowledge of the Company, there is no reason (specific to the Company or
any of its subsidiaries) that may cause any Governmental Authority to
deny or withhold any consent or approval required to be obtained in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
including but not limited to, the Merger, other than such matters, if
any, as have been disclosed in the Company Disclosure Schedule or in the
Company SEC Filings (as defined below) filed between December 31, 2000
and the date hereof.
(g) Financial Reports and SEC Documents.
(i) The Company and its subsidiaries have filed all reports,
returns, registrations and statements (such reports and filings referred
to as "Company Filings"), together with any amendments required to be
made with respect thereto, that were required to be filed with (A) the
SEC, (B) the OTS, (C) the FDIC and (D) any other applicable Governmental
Authority, including taxing authorities, except where the failure to
file such reports, returns, registrations or statements would not
constitute a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. As of their
respective dates, each of such Company Filings (1) complied in all
material respects with all laws and regulations enforced or promulgated
by the Governmental Authority with which it was filed (or was amended so
as to be in compliance promptly following discovery of any such
noncompliance) and (2) did not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
(ii) Each of the consolidated balance sheets contained in or
incorporated by reference into any of the Company Filings (including the
related notes and schedules thereto) fairly presents the consolidated
financial position of the Company and its subsidiaries as of its date,
and each of the consolidated statements of income and changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows or equivalent statements in the
Company Filings (including any related notes and schedules thereto)
fairly presents the consolidated results of operations, changes in
stockholders' equity and changes in cash flows, as the case may be, of
the Company and its subsidiaries for the periods to which they relate,
in each case in accordance with GAAP, as applicable, consistently
applied during the periods involved, except in each case as may be noted
therein, subject to normal year-end audit adjustments and the lack of
complete footnote disclosure in the case of unaudited statements.
(iii) Except as set forth in the Company Filings filed with the SEC
(the "Company SEC Filings") between December 31, 2000 and the date
hereof, since December 31, 2000, the Company and its subsidiaries have
not incurred any liability other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice (other than (A) liabilities with respect
to expenses and charges related to this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby, (B) liabilities which are not required to be
reflected in a balance sheet prepared in accordance with GAAP and (C)
liabilities that, in the aggregate, are not material to the Company and
its subsidiaries taken as a whole).
(iv) Except as set forth in the Company SEC Filings filed between
December 31, 2000 and the date hereof, since December 31, 2000, the
Company and its subsidiaries have conducted their respective businesses
in the ordinary and usual course consistent with past practice
(excluding the incurrence of liabilities with respect to expenses and
charges related to this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby) and no event has occurred or circumstance arisen that,
individually or taken together with all other facts, circumstances and
events, constitutes a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
(h) Litigation. Except as set forth in the Company SEC Filings filed
between December 31, 2000 and the date hereof, there is no private or
governmental suit, claim, action or proceeding (other than those arising in
the ordinary course of business in connection with loan workouts or
assumptions) pending, nor to the Company's knowledge threatened, against
the Company or any of its subsidiaries or, to the Company's knowledge,
against any of their respective directors, officers or employees relating
to the performance of their duties in such capacities or against or
affecting any properties of the Company or its subsidiaries that, if
adversely determined, would have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
A-13
84
Except as disclosed in the Company SEC Filings filed between December 31,
2000 and the date hereof, there are no material judgments, decrees,
stipulations or orders against the Company or its subsidiaries or enjoining
any of them or, to the knowledge of the Company, any of their respective
directors, officers or employees in respect of, or the effect of which is
to prohibit, any business practice or the acquisition of any property or
the conduct of business in any area.
(i) Regulatory Matters.
(i) Except as set forth in the Company SEC Filings filed between
December 31, 2000 and the date hereof, neither the Company nor any of
its subsidiaries or properties is a party to or is subject to any
currently effective order, decree, agreement, memorandum of
understanding or similar arrangement with, or any currently effective
commitment letter or similar submission to, or extraordinary supervisory
letter from, any federal or state governmental agency or authority
charged with the supervision or regulation of financial institutions or
issuers of securities or engaged in the insurance of deposits
(including, without limitation, the OTS and the FDIC) or the supervision
or regulation of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (collectively,
the "Regulatory Authorities") which would have a Material Adverse Effect
on the Company.
(ii) Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has been
advised by any Regulatory Authority that such Regulatory Authority is
contemplating issuing or requesting (or is considering the
appropriateness of issuing or requesting) any such order, decree,
agreement, memorandum of understanding, commitment letter, supervisory
letter or similar submission.
(j) Compliance with Laws. The Company and each of its subsidiaries:
(i) is in compliance with all applicable federal, state, local and
foreign statutes, laws, regulations, ordinances, rules, judgments,
orders or decrees applicable thereto or to the employees conducting
their respective businesses ("Applicable Laws"), including, without
limitation, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, the
Community Reinvestment Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and all
other applicable fair lending laws and other laws relating to
discriminatory lending or other business practices, except for any such
non-compliance that, individually or in the aggregate, do not constitute
a Material Adverse Effect on the Company;
(ii) has made all filings, applications and registrations with all
Governmental Authorities that are required in order to permit them to
own or lease their properties and to conduct their businesses
substantially as presently conducted, except in each case as does not
constitute a Material Adverse Effect on the Company; and
(iii) has not received any outstanding notification or
communication from any federal or state (not including local)
Governmental Authority (A) asserting that the Company or any of its
subsidiaries is not in compliance with, or may not be in compliance
with, any Applicable Law that such federal or state (not including
local) Governmental Authority enforces or (B) threatening to revoke any
license, franchise, permit, or governmental authorization (nor, to the
Company's knowledge, do any grounds for any of the foregoing exist).
(k) Material Contracts; Defaults. Except as set forth in Section
4.2(k) of the Company Disclosure Schedule and except for those agreements
and other documents filed as exhibits (the "Material Contracts") to the
Company SEC Filings, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is a
party to, bound by or subject to any agreement, contract, arrangement,
commitment or understanding (whether written or oral) (i) that is a
"material contract" within the meaning of Item 601(b)(10) of the SEC's
Regulation S-K or (ii) that materially restricts the conduct of business by
the Company or any of its subsidiaries. Neither the Company nor any of its
subsidiaries is in default in any material respect under any Material
Contract or under any other contract if such default constitutes a Material
Adverse Effect on the Company, and there has not occurred any event that,
with the lapse of time or the giving of notice or both, would constitute
such a default.
A-14
85
(l) No Brokers. No action has been taken by the Company that would
give rise to any valid claim against any party hereto for a brokerage
commission, finder's fee or other like payment with respect to the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, excluding a fee to be paid to
Sandler O'Neill which fee is payable solely by the Company.
(m) Employee Benefit Plans.
(i) Section 4.2(m) of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth a
true and complete list of each employee benefit plan, as defined in
Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as
amended ("ERISA") and each other plan, arrangement and agreement
providing employee benefits (collectively, the "Plans"), that covers
current or former employees of the Company or any subsidiary or
affiliate and is presently maintained by the Company or any subsidiary
or any affiliate thereof or by any trade or business, whether or not
incorporated (an "ERISA Affiliate"), which together with the Company
would be deemed a "single employer" within the meaning of Section 4001
of ERISA. Except as disclosed on Section 4.2(m) of the Company
Disclosure Schedule, none of the Plans is a "multiemployer plan," as
defined in Section 3(37) of ERISA. The Company has delivered or made
available to Buyer: copies of all such Plans; any related trust
agreements, group annuity contracts, insurance policies or other funding
agreements or arrangements relating thereto; the most recent
determination letter, if any, from the Internal Revenue Service with
respect to each of the Plans which is subject to ERISA ("ERISA Plans");
actuarial valuations, if applicable, for the most recent plan year or
which such valuations are available; the current summary plan
descriptions; and the annual return/report on Form 5500 and summary
annual reports for each of the Plans for each of the last three years.
(ii) Except as disclosed on Section 4.2(m) of the Company
Disclosure Schedule, each of the ERISA Plans is in compliance in all
material respects with all applicable provisions of law, including the
Code and ERISA and neither the Company or any ERISA Affiliate currently
maintains or sponsors a defined benefit pension plan as defined in
Section 414(j) of the Code and neither the Company nor any ERISA
Affiliate has ever maintained or sponsored any such plan that could give
rise to a liability against the Company or any subsidiary.
(iii) Except as disclosed on Section 4.2(m) of the Company
Disclosure Schedule, the written terms of each of the Plan, and any
related trust agreement, group annuity contract, insurance policy or
other funding arrangement are in compliance with all applicable laws in
all material respects including ERISA, the Code, and the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act, as applicable, and each of such Plans
has been administered in substantial compliance with such requirements.
(iv) Except with respect to income taxes on benefits paid or
provided, no income, excise or other tax or penalty (federal or state)
has been waived or excused, has been paid or is owed by any Person
(including, but not limited to, any Plan, any Plan fiduciary, the
Company and ERISA Affiliates) with respect to the operations of, or any
transactions with respect to, any Plan. No action has been taken, nor
has there been any failure to take any action, nor is any action or
failure to take action contemplated, that would subject any person or
entity to any material liability for any tax or penalty in connection
with any Plan. No reserve for any taxes or penalties has been
established with respect to any Plan, nor has any advice been given to
any person with respect to the need to establish such a reserve.
(v) There are no (A) actions, suits, arbitrations or claims (other
than routine claims for benefits), (B) legal, administrative or other
proceedings or governmental investigations or audits or (C) complains to
or by any governmental entity, which are pending, anticipated, or to the
Company's best knowledge, threatened, against the Plans or their assets.
(vi) The present value of the future cost to the Company and ERISA
Affiliates of post-retirement medical benefits that the Company or any
ERISA Affiliate is obligated to provide, calculated on the basis of
actuarial assumptions the Company considers reasonable estimates of
A-15
86
future experience and which have been provided to Acquisition, does not
exceed the amount specified in Schedule 2(m)(vi) hereto.
(vii) Neither the Company or any ERISA Affiliate, nor any of the
ERISA Plans, nor any trust created thereunder, nor any trustee or
administrator thereof has engaged in a transaction in connection with
which the Company or any ERISA Affiliate, any of the ERISA Plans, any
such trust, or any trustee or administrator thereof, or any party
dealing with the ERISA Plans or any such trust could be subject to
either a civil penalty assessed pursuant to Section 409 or 502(i) of
ERISA or a tax imposed pursuant to Section 4975 or 4976 of the Code.
Neither the Company nor any ERISA Affiliate is, or, as a result of any
actions, omissions, occurrences or state or facts existing prior to the
Effective Time, may become liable for any tax imposed under Section 4978
of the Code.
(n) Labor Matters. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is
a party to or is bound by any collective bargaining agreement, contract or
other agreement or understanding with a labor union or labor organization,
nor is the Company or any of its subsidiaries the subject of a proceeding
asserting that it or any such subsidiary has committed an unfair labor
practice (within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act) or
seeking to compel the Company or any such subsidiary to bargain with any
labor organization as to wages or conditions of employment, nor is there
any strike or other material labor dispute or disputes involving it or any
of its subsidiaries pending or, to the Company's knowledge, threatened, nor
is the Company aware of any activity involving any employee of the Company
or any of its subsidiaries seeking to certify a collective bargaining unit
or engaging in other organizational activity.
(o) Rights Agreement. The Company has taken all action necessary to
ensure that the entering into of this Agreement will not enable or require
the Company's Rights issued under the Amended and Restated Rights
Agreement, dated as of March 26, 1999, between the Company and American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (the "Rights Agreement") to
be exercised, distributed or triggered or cause Buyer to become an "15%
Stockholder" (as defined in the Rights Agreement).
(p) Environmental Matters. To the knowledge of the Company, neither
the conduct, participation in management nor operation by the Company or
its subsidiaries nor any condition of any property presently or previously
owned, leased, managed (including participation in management) or operated
by any of them (including, without limitation, in a fiduciary or agency
capacity) violates or violated in any material respect any applicable
local, state and federal environmental, health and safety laws and
regulations, including, without limitation, the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act, the Clean Water Act, the Federal Clean Air Act, and the
Occupational Safety and Health Act, each as amended, regulations
promulgated thereunder, and state counterparts (collectively,
"Environmental Laws") that would constitute a Material Adverse Effect on
the Company and that is not reflected in the consolidated financial
statements of the Company. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries
has received any notice from any individual, corporation, partnership,
limited liability company, association, trust, unincorporated organization
or other legal entity (each, a "Person") that the Company or its
subsidiaries or the operation or condition of any property ever owned,
leased, managed (including participation in management), operated or held
as collateral or in a fiduciary capacity by any of them are or were in
violation of or otherwise are alleged to have any material liability under
any Environmental Law, which would constitute a Material Adverse Effect and
is not reflected in the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
(q) Tax Matters.
(i) (A) The Company and its subsidiaries have prepared in good
faith and duly and timely filed all Tax Returns (as defined below) that
they were required to file, and all such Tax Returns are complete and
accurate in all material respects; (B) the Company and its subsidiaries
have paid in full all Taxes (as defined below) shown on such Tax Returns
(including interest and penalties) or have provided adequate reserves
for any such Taxes in the financial statements of the Company in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, except for
such Taxes as could not reasonably be expected to be material to the
Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole; (C) there are no pending
or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened audits, examinations,
A-16
87
assessments or proposed assessments of a deficiency, or refund
litigation with respect to any Taxes of the Company or its subsidiaries,
except as could not, individually or in the aggregate, constitute a
Material Adverse Effect; (D) all Taxes, interest, additions and
penalties due with respect to completed and settled examinations or
concluded litigation relating to Taxes of the Company or its
subsidiaries have been paid in full or adequate provision has been made
for any such Taxes (in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles) on the financial statements of the Company; and (E) neither
the Company nor its subsidiaries has executed an extension or waiver of
any statute of limitations on the assessment or collection of any Tax
due that is currently in effect.
(ii) (A) No Liens or other security interests have been imposed on
any assets of the Company or its subsidiaries in connection with any
failure (or alleged failure) to pay any Tax, except for such liens and
security interests that are not, individually or in the aggregate,
material to the Company and its subsidiaries or that have arisen with
respect to Taxes that are not yet due and payable; (B) neither the
Company nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to any tax allocation or
sharing agreement under which it has obligations to a party other than
the Company or its subsidiaries or is or has been a member of an
affiliated group filing consolidated or combined tax returns (other than
a group the common parent of which is or was the Company); and (C)
neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has made any material
payments, is obligated to make any material payments or is a party to
any agreement that under certain circumstances could obligate it to make
any material payments that would not be deductible under Section 280G of
the Code.
(iii) For purposes of this Agreement, (A) "Tax" or "Taxes" means
any federal, state, local or foreign taxes, charges, fees, levies or
other assessments, however denominated, including, without limitation,
all net income, gross income, gains, gross receipts, sales, use, ad
valorem, goods and services, capital, production, transfer, franchise,
windfall profits, license, withholding, payroll, employment, disability,
employer health, excise, estimated, severance, stamp, occupation,
property, environmental, unemployment or other taxes, custom duties,
fees, assessments or charges of any kind whatsoever, together with any
interest and any penalties, additions to tax or additional amounts
imposed by any taxing authority and (B) "Tax Returns" means any return,
declaration, report, claim or refund, or information return or statement
relating to Taxes, including any schedule or attachment thereto, and
including any amendment thereof.
(r) Books and Records. The books and records of the Company and its
subsidiaries have been fully, properly and accurately maintained in all
material respects, and there are no material inaccuracies or discrepancies
of any kind contained or reflected therein (other than minutes for meetings
held within the last 30 days which have not been prepared or approved and
subject to the proviso that copies furnished or made available to Buyer may
have excluded information relating to the negotiation of this Agreement or
covered by the attorney-client, work product or other privilege).
(s) Indemnification. Other than pursuant to the provisions of its
charter or bylaws or Applicable Law, or as disclosed in a Company Filing,
neither the Company nor its subsidiaries is a party to any indemnification
agreement with any of its present directors, officers, employees, agents or
other Persons who serve in any other capacity with any other enterprise at
the request of Company.
(t) Intellectual Property. To the knowledge of the Company, and except
for such matters as would not constitute a Material Adverse Effect on the
Company, (i) the Company and its subsidiaries own or possess valid and
binding licenses and other rights to use all material patents, copyrights,
trade secrets, trade names, service marks and trademarks used in their
respective businesses; (ii) the Company and its subsidiaries have not
received any notice with respect thereto that asserts the rights of others;
and (iii) the Company and its subsidiaries have in all material respects
performed all the obligations required to be performed by them, and are not
in default in any material respect under any license, contract, agreement,
arrangement, or commitment relating to any of the foregoing.
(u) Disclosures and Diligence. All material (i) historical
information, including, without limitation, the identity of documents and
agreements, and (ii) information concerning compensation, severance and
other employee benefits, set forth in the Company Disclosure Schedule has
previously been provided
A-17
88
or made available to Buyer or its representatives in the course of their
previous due diligence investigations of the Company.
SECTION 4.3. Representations and Warranties of Buyer. Buyer hereby
represents and warrants to the Company as follows:
(a) Organization and Standing. Buyer is a corporation, duly organized,
validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of
Illinois. Each of Buyer and its subsidiaries is duly qualified to do
business and is in good standing in the states of the United States and any
foreign jurisdictions where its ownership or leasing of property or assets
or the conduct of its business requires it to be so qualified, except for
such jurisdictions where the failure to be so qualified, individually or in
the aggregate, would not constitute a Material Adverse Effect on Buyer.
Buyer has the corporate power and authority to execute, deliver and perform
its obligations under this Agreement and to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby.
(b) Corporate Authority. This Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate
action of Buyer on or prior to the date hereof. This Agreement is a valid
and legally binding obligation of Buyer, enforceable in accordance with its
terms, except as enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy,
insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent transfer and similar
laws of general applicability relating to or affecting creditors' rights or
by general equity principles.
(c) Approvals, No Defaults.
(i) No consents or approvals of, or filings or registrations with,
any Governmental Authority are required to be made or obtained by Buyer,
Acquisition Sub or any other of Buyer's subsidiaries in connection with
the execution, delivery or performance by Buyer or Acquisition Sub of
this Agreement or to consummate the Merger, except for (A) filings and
approvals of applications with and by the OTS, the FDIC, the DOJ, the
NASD, the Federal Reserve Board and the FTC, and (B) the filing of the
Certificate of Merger with the Delaware Secretary pursuant to the DGCL.
To the knowledge of Buyer, there is no reason (specific to Buyer,
Acquisition Sub or any other of Buyer's subsidiaries or affiliates) that
may cause any Governmental Authority to deny or withhold any consent or
approval required to be obtained in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement (other than such matters, if any, as have
been disclosed in Buyer's filings with the SEC between December 31, 2000
and the date hereof).
(ii) Subject to receipt of the regulatory approvals referred to in
Section 4.3(c)(i) and expiration of related waiting periods, the
execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Buyer and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby do not and will not
(A) constitute a breach or violation of, or a default under, or give
rise to any Lien, any acceleration of remedies or any right of
termination or cancellation under, any law, rule or regulation or any
judgment, decree, writ, injunction, statute, order, governmental permit
or license, or note, bond, mortgage, agreement, indenture or instrument
of Buyer or any subsidiary of Buyer, or to which Buyer or any of Buyer's
subsidiaries or any of their respective properties or assets is subject
or bound, (B) constitute a breach or violation of, or a default under,
the certificate of incorporation, charter, bylaws or similar
organizational documents of Buyer or any of Buyer's subsidiaries or (C)
require any consent or approval under any such law, rule, regulation,
judgment, decree, writ, injunction, statute, order, governmental permit
or license, note, bond, mortgage, agreement, indenture or instrument,
except in each case for such matters as would not constitute a Material
Adverse Effect on Buyer.
(d) Regulatory Matters. Except for such matters as would not
constitute a Material Adverse Effect on Buyer, (i) neither Buyer nor any of
its subsidiaries or properties is a party to or is subject to any order,
decree, agreement, memorandum of understanding or similar agreement with,
or a commitment letter or similar submission to, or extraordinary
supervisory letter from, any federal or state governmental agency or
authority charged with the supervision or regulation of financial
institutions or issuers of
A-18
89
securities or engaged in the insurance of deposits (including, without
limitation, the OTS, the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC) or the
supervision or regulation of Buyer or any of its subsidiaries
(collectively, the "Buyer Regulatory Authorities"); and (ii) neither Buyer
nor any of its subsidiaries has been advised by any Buyer Regulatory
Authority that such Buyer Regulatory Authority is contemplating issuing or
requesting (or is considering the appropriateness of issuing or requesting)
any such order, decree, agreement, memorandum of understanding, commitment
letter, supervisory letter or similar submission.
(e) Knowledge of Misrepresentations. As of the date of this Agreement,
Buyer has no knowledge of any breach by the Company of any representation
or warranty made by the Company herein.
(f) Financial Statements.
(i) Buyer has delivered to the Company true and correct copies of
Buyer's audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the
years ended December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999, which fairly
present the consolidated financial position, results of operations,
changes in stockholders' equity and changes in cash flows of Buyer and
its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999 and for
the years then ended, in each case in accordance with GAAP, consistently
applied during the periods involved, except in each case as may be noted
therein (collectively, the "Buyer Financial Statements").
(ii) Except as set forth in the Buyer Financial Statements, since
December 31, 2000, no event has occurred or circumstance arisen that,
individually or taken together with all other facts, circumstances and
events, constitute a Material Adverse Effect on Buyer.
(g) No Brokers. No action has been taken by Buyer that would give rise
to any valid claim against any party hereto for a brokerage commission,
finder's fee or other like payment with respect to the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, except as set forth in Section 4.3(g) of
the Buyer Disclosure Schedule.
ARTICLE V.
COVENANTS
SECTION 5.1. Acquisition Proposals.
(a) The Company shall not, directly or indirectly, take any action to: (i)
encourage (including by way of furnishing nonpublic information), solicit,
initiate or facilitate any Acquisition Proposal (as defined below), (ii) enter
into any agreement with respect to any Acquisition Proposal or (iii) participate
in any way in discussions or negotiations with, or furnish any information to,
any Person in connection with, or take any other action to facilitate any
inquiries or the making of any proposal that constitutes, or could reasonably be
expected to lead to, any Acquisition Proposal.
(b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, if the Company Board
determines in good faith, after consultation with outside counsel, that it is
necessary to do so to discharge properly its fiduciary duties to its
Stockholders (as such duties would exist in the absence of this Section 5.1), or
if so required by any Regulatory Authority, the Company may, in response to an
Acquisition Proposal that the Company Board determines in good faith is
reasonably likely to result in a Superior Proposal (as defined below), and
subject to the Company's compliance with Section 5.1(c), furnish information
with respect to the Company and its subsidiaries to the Person making such
Acquisition Proposal pursuant to a customary confidentiality agreement the terms
of which are no more favorable to the other party to such confidentiality
agreement than the Confidentiality Agreement (as defined below) and (ii)
participate in discussions with respect to such Acquisition Proposal. It is
expressly understood and agreed that, with respect to the foregoing proviso, the
Company's legal and financial advisors shall be able to make inquiries, and
engage in discussions, with any party that has made an Acquisition Proposal (and
such party's legal and financial advisors) in order to elicit information to
allow the Company Board to determine in good faith if such Acquisition Proposal
is reasonably likely to result in a Superior Proposal.
A-19
90
(c) The Company will, as promptly as practicable, communicate to Buyer any
inquiry received by it relating to any potential Acquisition Proposal and the
material terms of any such proposal or inquiry, including the identity of the
Person and its affiliates making the same, that it may receive in respect of any
such transaction, or of any such information requested from such Person or of
any such negotiations or discussions being sought to be initiated with such
Person.
(d) "Acquisition Proposal" means any offer or proposal concerning any
merger, consolidation or similar transaction involving, or any purchase of all
or any significant portion of the assets, deposits or any equity securities of,
the Company or any of its subsidiaries; provided, however, that offers,
proposals or transaction relating to acquisitions of currently outstanding
equity securities by third parties representing less than 10% of the voting
power of the Company shall not be deemed Acquisition Proposals. "Superior
Proposal" means a bona fide Acquisition Proposal made by a third party which was
not solicited by the Company, its subsidiaries, representatives or other
affiliates and which, in the good faith judgment of the Company Board, taking
into account, to the extent deemed appropriate by the Company Board, the various
legal, financial and regulatory aspects of the proposal and the Person making
such proposal (i) if accepted, is reasonably likely to be consummated and (ii)
if consummated, is reasonably likely to result in a transaction that is more
favorable to the Stockholders (in their capacity as Stockholders), from a
financial point of view, than the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(e) If the Company Board is prepared to accept a Superior Proposal, then
the Company shall give Buyer 48 hours notice that the Company is prepared to
accept the Superior Proposal; provided that the Company may not definitively
accept a Superior Proposal unless the Company concurrently therewith terminates
this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(d) and, thereafter makes any payment
required by Section 7.2(b).
SECTION 5.2. Labor and Employment Matters.
(a) Buyer shall, and shall cause the Bank to, provide the employees of the
Company or any of its subsidiaries who are retained by Buyer or the Bank after
the consummation of the Merger with benefits under stock plans, bonus plans and
all other benefit plans of Buyer on substantially the same basis as other
similarly situated employees of Buyer. Each of these employees of the Company or
its subsidiaries will be eligible to participate immediately in said plans and
will be credited for eligibility, participation, vesting and accrual purposes,
with such employee's respective years of past service with the Company (or other
prior service so credited by the Company) as though they had been employees of
Buyer. Buyer shall, and shall cause the Bank to, honor in accordance with their
terms all the employee benefit and deferred compensation obligations to current
and former employees and directors of the Company and the Bank accrued as of the
Effective Time of the Merger. The Company and its ERISA Affiliates shall (to the
extent permissible under the Plans and Applicable Laws) take any actions
necessary or reasonably requested by Buyer to cause as of the Closing Date, the
termination of all of the Plans maintained by the Company or any ERISA Affiliate
that cover employees and directors of the Company and its ERISA Affiliates;
provided, however, that the Company 401(k) Plan shall not be terminated but
shall be merged with the Buyer 401(k) Plan as soon as administratively
practicable after the Closing Date. Buyer also agrees that any pre-existing
condition limitation or exclusion or waiting period in its health plans shall
not apply to the employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries who are
retained after the consummation of the Merger or to their spouses and dependents
who are covered under similar health plans of the Company and its ERISA
Affiliates on the Closing Date and who change coverage to Buyer's health plans
at the time such employees are first given the option to enroll in Buyer's
health plans and that such employees shall be given credit for co-payments or
deductibles satisfied, made or incurred prior to Closing Date. With respect to
any employee with a satisfactory work record not covered by an employment
contract or change in control agreement who is retained after the Closing and
terminated without cause within six (6) months after the Closing, Buyer shall
assume and provide the benefits under the Company's Personnel Manual regarding
"Reduction in Force (Lay-Off)" and the related "Special Severance and Benefits
Program", with full credit for length of service to the Company and Buyer;
provided, however, that in lieu of providing such benefits, Buyer may, at its
sole option, elect to provide any or all of such employees with a cash payment
or, as applicable, reimbursement of actual costs (in either case, including a
"gross up" for Taxes) in such amount sufficient to allow such employees to
purchase equivalent benefits on an individually negotiated basis.
A-20
91
(b) As of the Closing, Buyer shall expressly assume any obligation of the
Company and its subsidiaries under the employment, change-in-control and other
agreements listed on Section 5.2 of the Company Disclosure Schedule; provided,
however, that to the extent that such agreements provide for post-termination
benefits other than cash, Buyer may, at its sole option, elect to provide any or
all of such employees with a cash payment or reimbursement of actual costs (in
either case, including a "gross up" for Taxes) in such amount sufficient to
allow such employees to purchase equivalent benefits on an individually
negotiated basis.
(c) The Company shall deliver or cause to be delivered to Buyer at the
Closing the resignations of the members of the Board of Directors of the
Company, the Bank and their subsidiaries, effective at the Closing. In addition,
such officers or employees of the Company listed on Section 5.2(c) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule (or otherwise requested by Buyer in writing from
time to time prior to the Closing) will be terminated immediately after the
Closing. It is acknowledged and agreed by Buyer and the Company that the
resignations and terminations provided for in the two prior sentences shall be
deemed to be "termination" following a "change of control," as these terms are
defined in any employment, severance, change-in-control or similar agreement or
arrangement relating to such persons, by the Company without cause for purposes
of determining any termination, retirement, severance, change-in-control or
similar payments or other benefit due to such persons, and Buyer shall cause all
such payments to be paid to such persons at the Closing or otherwise in
accordance with the terms of such agreements or arrangements. Such officers or
employees of the Company listed on Section 5.2(c) of the Company Disclosure
Schedule (or otherwise requested by Buyer in writing from time to time prior to
the Closing) shall not be considered "retained" under Section 5.2(a) and shall
not be entitled to participate in any of Buyer's or its Affiliates' employee
benefit plans and programs, severance arrangements or other employee benefit
arrangements.
SECTION 5.3. Access and Information. Upon reasonable notice and subject to
Applicable Laws relating to the exchange of information, the Company shall, and
shall cause each of its subsidiaries to, afford to the officers, employees,
accountants, counsel and other representatives of Buyer reasonable access,
during normal business hours during the time period from the date of this
Agreement to the Effective Time or date of termination, as applicable, to all
its properties, books, contracts, commitments, records, officers, employees,
accountants, counsel and other representatives and, during such period, except
as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the Company shall, and shall cause its
subsidiaries to, make available to Buyer (a) a copy of each report, schedule and
other document filed or received by it during such period pursuant to the
requirements of federal securities laws or federal or state banking laws (other
than reports or documents which the Company is not permitted to disclose under
Applicable Law) and (b) all other information concerning its business,
properties and personnel as Buyer may reasonably request; provided that such
requested information may be presented in the format maintained by the Company
or its subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business. Neither the Company nor
any of its subsidiaries shall be required to provide access to or to disclose
information under this Agreement where such access or disclosure would violate
or prejudice the rights of their customers, jeopardize any attorney-client, work
product or other privilege, contravene any law, rule, regulations, order,
judgment, decree, fiduciary duty or binding agreement entered into prior to the
date of this Agreement or involve information regarding the rights and
obligations of the Company or the Bank under this Agreement. The parties hereto
will use reasonable efforts to make appropriate substitute disclosure
arrangements under circumstances in which the restrictions of the preceding
sentence apply. Buyer will hold all such information in confidence in accordance
with the provisions of the Confidentiality Agreement, dated April 25, 2001,
between Buyer and the Company (the "Confidentiality Agreement").
SECTION 5.4. Actions; Regulatory Matters.
(a) Subject to the terms and conditions herein provided, each of the
parties hereto agrees to use its commercially reasonable efforts to take
promptly, or cause to be taken promptly, all actions and to do promptly, or
cause to be done promptly, all things necessary, proper or advisable under
Applicable Law to consummate and make effective the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement as soon as practicable, including, without limitation, promptly
preparing and filing all necessary documentation, effecting all applications,
notices, registrations, petitions and filings, and obtaining as promptly as
practicable all permits, consents, approvals, extensions, waivers and
authorizations of all third parties and Governmental Authorities
A-21
92
which are necessary or advisable to consummate the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement and complying with the terms and conditions of all such permits,
consents, approvals and authorizations.
(b) The Company and Buyer shall have the right to review in advance, and to
the extent practicable each will consult the other on, in each case subject to
Applicable Laws relating to the exchange of information, all the information
relating to the Company or Buyer, as the case may be, and any of their
respective subsidiaries, which appear in any filing made with, or written
materials submitted to, any third party or any Governmental Authority in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. In exercising
the foregoing right, each of the parties hereto shall act reasonably and as
promptly as practicable. The parties hereto agree that they will consult with
each other with respect to the obtaining of all permits, consents, approvals and
authorizations of all third parties and Governmental Authorities necessary or
advisable to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and each
party will keep the other apprised of the status of matters relating to
completion of the transactions contemplated herein.
(c) Buyer and the Company shall, upon request, furnish each other with all
information concerning themselves, their subsidiaries, directors, officers and
stockholders and such other matters as may be reasonably necessary or advisable
in connection with the Proxy Statement or any other statement, filing, notice or
application made by or on behalf of Buyer or the Company or any of their
respective subsidiaries to any Governmental Authority in connection with the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(d) The Company shall promptly furnish Buyer, and Buyer shall promptly
furnish the Company, with copies of written communications received by the
Company or Buyer, respectively, or any of their respective subsidiaries,
affiliates or associates (as such terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as in effect on the date of this
Agreement) from, or delivered by any of the foregoing to, any Governmental
Authority in respect of the transactions contemplated hereby. The parties hereto
and their subsidiaries shall not be required to provide access to or disclose
information where such access or disclosure would jeopardize the
attorney-client, work product or other privilege of any party or any subsidiary
or would contravene any law, rule, regulation, order, judgment, decree or
binding agreement entered into prior to the date hereof. The parties will use
reasonable efforts to make appropriate substitute disclosure arrangements under
the circumstances in which the restrictions of the preceding sentence apply.
(e) Buyer covenants that it shall have adequate funds and sufficient
regulatory capital to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.
SECTION 5.5. Publicity. No press release or other public disclosure of
matters related to this Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated hereby
shall be made by a party hereto unless the other party shall have provided its
prior consent to the form and substance thereof; provided, however, that nothing
herein shall be deemed to prohibit any party hereto from making any disclosure
that its counsel deems necessary or advisable in order to fulfill such party's
disclosure obligations imposed by Applicable Law.
SECTION 5.6. Proxy Statement. The Company shall promptly prepare a proxy
statement for use in connection with the Company's meeting of stockholders
described below (including any supplements or amendments thereto, the "Proxy
Statement"), and the Company shall promptly, after final SEC review thereof and
receipt of any other necessary approvals from any Governmental Authority, mail
the Proxy Statement to all holders of record (as of the applicable record date)
of shares of Company Common Stock.
SECTION 5.7. Stockholders' Meeting. The Company shall take all action
necessary, in accordance with Applicable Law and its Certificate of
Incorporation and bylaws, to convene a meeting or obtain written consent of the
holders of Company Common Stock as promptly as practicable for the purpose of
considering and taking action required by this Agreement. Except to the extent
legally required for the discharge by the Company Board of its fiduciary duties,
the Company Board shall recommend that the holders of the Company Common Stock
vote in favor of and approve the Merger and adopt this Agreement.
A-22
93
SECTION 5.8. Notification of Certain Matters.
(a) Default; Material Adverse Effect. The Company and Buyer shall each give
prompt notice to the other of: (i) any notice of, or other communication
relating to, a default or event that, with notice or lapse of time or both,
would become a default, received by it or any of its subsidiaries subsequent to
the date of this Agreement and prior to the Effective Time, under any contract
material to the financial condition, properties, businesses or results of
operations of such party and its subsidiaries taken as a whole to which such
party or any such subsidiary is a party or is subject; (ii) any Material Adverse
Effect with respect to such party or the occurrence of any event which, so far
as reasonably can be foreseen at the time of its occurrence, is reasonably
likely to result in a Material Adverse Effect; and (iii) any notice or other
communication from any third party alleging that the consent of such third party
is or may be required in connection with the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, if a failure to obtain such consent would constitute a Material
Adverse Effect.
(b) Material Breach. Each party shall promptly advise the other (i) of any
circumstance or event that such party believes would, or would be reasonably
likely to, cause or constitute a material breach of any of its representations,
warranties or covenants contained herein and (ii) in the event that it
determines that any of the conditions to Closing set forth in Article VI cannot
be fulfilled.
(c) Pending OTS, State Regulator or FDIC Exams. Within five (5) business
days of receiving notification thereof, the Company shall notify Buyer of any
examination reviews with respect to the Company that are to be conducted by the
OTS, any state banking commission or other regulatory authority ("State
Regulator") or the FDIC or by any other Governmental Authority under any
Applicable Law, and shall report to Buyer on a regular basis (subject to
Applicable Law) on the preliminary and final results of any such examination
review. The Company shall request the consent of each Governmental Authority
conducting any such examination to the release of such results to Buyer and
shall use reasonable efforts to secure such release.
SECTION 5.9. Additional Agreements. In case at any time after the Effective
Time any further action is necessary or desirable to carry out the purposes of
this Agreement, or to vest the Surviving Company with full title to all
properties, assets, rights, approvals, immunities and franchises of any of the
parties to the Merger, the proper officers and directors of each party to this
Agreement and their respective subsidiaries shall take all such necessary action
as may be reasonably requested by the other party hereto.
SECTION 5.10. Filings. The Company agrees that through the Effective Time
of the Merger, the reports, registrations, statements and other filings required
to be filed with any applicable Governmental Authority by the Company or the
Bank will comply in all material respects with all the applicable statutes,
rules and regulations enforced or promulgated by the Governmental Authority with
which it will be filed and none will contain, as of the date of filing, any
untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact required to
be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
SECTION 5.11. [Intentionally Omitted].
SECTION 5.12. Accuracy of Information. Each of the Company and Buyer
covenants and agrees that all information furnished by it or any of its
subsidiaries for inclusion in all applications or statements filed with the
appropriate regulatory authorities for or in connection with any approval of, or
consent to, the Merger will comply in all material respects with the provisions
of Applicable Law, and will not contain any untrue statement of material fact or
omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to
make the statements contained therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they were made, not misleading, in each case, as of the time such information is
so furnished, the date any such consent or approval is granted, and (in
connection with information furnished for inclusion in the Proxy Statement) the
date of mailing of the Proxy Statement and the date of the Special Meeting of
Stockholders.
SECTION 5.13. Indemnification and Insurance.
(a) Following the Effective Time, subject to Applicable Law, Buyer shall
indemnify, defend and hold harmless (and advance expenses to) the current or
former directors, officers, employees or agents of the
A-23
94
Company, the Bank and their respective subsidiaries (each, an "Indemnified
Party", and collectively, "Indemnified Parties") against all costs or expenses
(including reasonable attorneys' fees), judgments, fines, losses, claims,
damages or liabilities (collectively, "Costs") as incurred, in connection with
any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative, arising out of actions or omissions occurring
at or prior to the Effective Time (including, without limitation, the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement) to the fullest extent that the
Company, the Bank or their respective subsidiaries are required to indemnify
(and advance expenses to) the Indemnified Parties under the laws of their
respective jurisdictions of incorporation, their respective charters, their
respective bylaws and any agreements entered into between the Company, the Bank
or any of their respective subsidiaries and such Indemnified Parties (the
"Indemnification Provisions").
(b) Buyer will cause to be maintained, for a period of six years from the
Effective Time, the Company's current directors' and officers' insurance and
indemnification policy ("Company D&O Insurance") covering those Persons (the
"Covered Persons")who are currently covered by Company D&O Insurance to the
extent that it provides coverage for events or acts occurring prior to or at the
Effective Time (through the continuation or endorsement of the policy for
Company D&O Insurance or the purchase of a "tail-end rider"), provided, that
Buyer may, in lieu of maintaining such existing Company D&O Insurance, cause
coverage to be provided under any policy maintained for the benefit of Buyer or
any of its subsidiaries (a "Buyer Policy"), so long as the terms thereof are
substantially similar to those of the existing Company D&O Insurance (including,
without limitation, with respect to the continuity dates and the extent of
coverage for prior events or acts) to the extent, in either circumstance, that
the annual premiums for such coverage do not exceed 150% of the annual premiums
paid by the Company or the Bank for such coverage as of the date of this
Agreement. To the extent that such annual premiums do exceed 150% of the annual
premiums currently paid by the Company or the Bank for such coverage, Buyer
shall use its best efforts to obtain the maximum amount of such coverage that
may be purchased for an annual premium equal to 150% of the annual premiums
currently paid by the Company or the Bank. The provision of insurance coverage
described herein is not intended to alter or reduce the right of indemnity in
favor of officers, directors, employees and agents of the Company, the Bank or
any of their respective subsidiaries under their charters, bylaws,
indemnification agreements or otherwise. For the avoidance of doubt: (i) in the
event that a tail-end rider is purchased, Buyer's obligation with respect to the
total premium therefor shall not exceed the annual premium currently paid by the
Company for the Company D&O Insurance multiplied by six (6) and (ii) in the
event that Buyer causes the required coverage to be provided under a Buyer
Policy, the 150% limitation provided in this Section 5.13 applies only with
respect to the incremental cost of adding the Covered Persons.
ARTICLE VI.
CONDITIONS TO CONSUMMATION
SECTION 6.1. Conditions to Each Party's Obligation. The respective
obligations of Buyer and the Company to effect the Merger shall be subject to
the satisfaction prior to the Effective Time of the following conditions:
(a) This Agreement and the Merger shall have been approved by the
requisite vote of the Stockholders in accordance with Applicable Law and
the charter document of the applicable entity.
(b) To the extent required by Applicable Law, all non-objections,
approvals or consents of any Governmental Authority, including, without
limitation, those of the OTS, the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC, shall
have been obtained or granted for the Merger and the transactions
contemplated hereby and the applicable waiting period under all laws shall
have expired (all such approvals and the expirations of all such waiting
periods being referred to herein as the "Requisite Regulatory Approvals").
All other statutory or regulatory requirements for the valid completion of
the transactions contemplated hereby shall have been satisfied and no
statute, rule, regulation, order, injunction or decree shall have been
enacted, entered, promulgated, interpreted, applied or enforced by any
Governmental Authority which prohibits, restricts or makes illegal
consummation of the Merger or any other transaction contemplated by this
Agreement.
A-24
95
(c) No party hereto shall be subject to any order, decree or
injunction of a court or agency of competent jurisdiction which enjoins or
prohibits the consummation of the Merger, or any other transaction
contemplated by this Agreement, and no litigation or proceeding shall be
pending against Acquisition Sub, Buyer or the Company or any of their
subsidiaries seeking to prevent consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby.
(d) No statute, rule, regulation, order, injunction or decree shall
have been enacted, entered, promulgated, interpreted, applied or enforced
by any Governmental Authority which prohibits, restricts or makes illegal,
or would cause such party to suffer a Material Adverse Effect as a result
of, consummation of the Merger, or any other transaction contemplated by
this Agreement.
(e) No material proceedings relating to the Proxy Statement shall have
been initiated by the SEC and pending.
SECTION 6.2. Conditions to the Obligation of Buyer. The obligation of Buyer
to effect the Merger shall be subject to the satisfaction or waiver prior to the
Effective Time of the following additional conditions:
(a) The representations and warranties of the Company set forth in
Section 4.2 of this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of
this Agreement and (except to the extent such representations and
warranties speak as of an earlier date and except to the extent modified by
actions taken in compliance with this Agreement) as of the Effective Date
as though made on and as of the Effective Date, except in each case where
the failure of a representation or warranty to be true and correct does not
cause a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. Buyer shall have received a
certificate signed on behalf of the Company by the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, dated the Effective Date,
to the foregoing effect.
(b) The Company shall have performed in all material respects all
covenants and agreements required to be performed by it under this
Agreement at or prior to the Effective Date, other than to the extent that
the failure to perform such covenants and agreements does not have a
Material Adverse Effect on the Company, and Buyer shall have received a
certificate signed on behalf of the Company by the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, dated the Effective Date,
to the foregoing effect.
(c) The regulatory approvals or consents necessary to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby shall not impose conditions that are, or
would be, upon consummation of the Merger, applicable to Buyer that would
constitute a Material Adverse Effect on the Company or Buyer.
(d) The Company shall have obtained all consents of other parties to
their respective material mortgages, notes, leases, franchises, agreements,
licenses and permits as may be necessary to permit the Merger and the
transactions contemplated herein to be consummated, except for such
consents the failure of which to obtain would not constitute a Material
Adverse Effect on the Company.
(e) The Rights Agreement shall have been terminated and neither Buyer
nor the Financial Institution Sub shall have been determined to be an
Acquiring Person.
(f) Between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time of the
Merger, there shall not have occurred any event that has had a Material
Adverse Effect on the Company.
SECTION 6.3. Conditions to the Obligation of the Company. The obligation of
the Company to effect the Merger shall be subject to the satisfaction or waiver
prior to the Effective Time of the following additional conditions:
(a) The representations and warranties of Buyer set forth in this
Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of this Agreement and
(except to the extent such representations and warranties speak as of an
earlier date) as of the Effective Date as though made on and as of the
Effective Date, except in each case where the failure of a representation
or warranty to be true and correct does not cause a Material Adverse Effect
on Buyer. The Company shall have received a certificate signed on behalf of
A-25
96
Buyer by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
Buyer, dated the Effective Date, to the foregoing effect.
(b) Buyer shall have performed, in all material respects, all
covenants and agreements required to be performed by it under this
Agreement at or prior to the Effective Date. The Company shall have
received a certificate signed on behalf of Buyer by the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Buyer, dated the Effective Date,
to the foregoing effect.
(c) The Company shall have obtained an updated Fairness Opinion from
Sandler O'Neill within five (5) days prior to the mailing of the Proxy
Statement to the Stockholders confirming that the Merger Consideration is
fair from a financial point of view to the Stockholders, and such Fairness
Opinion shall not have been revoked or adversely modified.
(d) Between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time of the
Merger, there shall not have occurred any event that has had or could
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Buyer.
(e) Buyer shall have made available to the Paying Agent the funds as
described in Section 2.3(b).
ARTICLE VII.
TERMINATION
SECTION 7.1. Termination. This Agreement may (and shall, as provided in
Sections 7.1(d) or (g) below) be terminated, and the Merger abandoned, prior to
the Effective Date, either before or after its approval by the Stockholders:
(a) by the mutual consent of Buyer and the Company in writing, if the
board of directors of each so determines by vote of a majority of the
members of its entire board;
(b) by Buyer or the Company by written notice to the other party if
either (i) the approval of any Governmental Authority required for the
consummation of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement shall have been denied by final unappealable action of such
Governmental Authority or (ii) any Governmental Authority of competent
jurisdiction shall have issued a final, unappealable order enjoining or
otherwise prohibiting consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement;
(c) by Buyer or the Company, if any approval of the Stockholders
required for the consummation of the Merger shall not have been obtained by
reason of the failure to obtain the required vote at a duly held meeting of
such Stockholders or at any adjournment or postponement thereof;
(d) concurrently with the acceptance by the Company of a Superior
Proposal;
(e) by Buyer or the Company (provided that the terminating party is
not then in material breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or
other agreement contained herein) if there shall have been a material
breach of any of the representations, warranties, covenants or agreements
set forth in this Agreement on the part of the other party, which breach is
not cured within thirty (30) days following written notice to the party
committing such breach, or which breach, by its nature, cannot be cured
prior to the Effective Time, unless such breach is waived by the
non-breaching party; provided, however, that neither party shall have the
right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 7.1(e) unless
the breach, together with all other such breaches, would entitle the party
not to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby pursuant to Section
6.2(a) or 6.2(b) (in the case of a breach of representation, warranty,
covenant or agreement by the Company) or Section 6.3(a) or 6.3(b) (in the
case of a breach of representation, warranty, covenant or agreement by
Buyer);
(f) by Buyer or the Company, if its board of directors so determines
by vote of a majority of the members of its entire board at such time as it
becomes apparent that a condition to such party's obligations contained in
Article VI hereof will not be satisfied (unless the failure to satisfy such
condition
A-26
97
is due to the breach of any material representation, warranty, covenant or
agreement contained in this Agreement by the party seeking to terminate);
or
(g) in the event that the Merger is not consummated by December 31,
2001 (the "Termination Date"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Buyer has
not obtained all Requisite Regulatory Approvals on or before December 31,
2001, but is not otherwise in breach of this Agreement, the Termination
Date shall be extended to March 31, 2002; provided further, that:
(i) if the Termination Date has been extended to March 31, 2002 and
if the Merger has not been consummated by such date solely as a result
of the failure by Buyer to obtain all Requisite Regulatory Approvals,
but Buyer is not otherwise in breach of this Agreement, and if Buyer
deposits an additional $1,000,000 into the Escrow Account on or before
such date, then Buyer may elect to extend the Termination Date to April
30, 2002;
(ii) if the Termination Date has been extended to April 30, 2002
and if the Merger has not been consummated by such date solely as a
result of the failure by Buyer to obtain all Requisite Regulatory
Approvals, but Buyer is not otherwise in breach of this Agreement, and
if Buyer deposits an additional $1,000,000 into the Escrow Account on or
before such date, then Buyer may elect to extend the Termination Date to
May 31, 2002; and
(iii) if the Termination Date has been extended to May 31, 2002 and
if the Merger has not been consummated by such date solely as a result
of the failure by Buyer to obtain all Requisite Regulatory Approvals,
but Buyer is not otherwise in breach of this Agreement, and if Buyer
deposits an additional $1,000,000 into the Escrow Account on or before
such date, then Buyer may elect to extend the Termination Date to June
30, 2002.
If the Termination Date is extended pursuant to this Section 7.1(g), Buyer shall
pay interest on the Merger Consideration at an interest rate equal to the prime
rate, and the Per Share Merger Consideration shall be adjusted appropriately.
SECTION 7.2. Effect of Breach or Termination. In the event of a breach by
any party hereto (other than a willful breach), the sole and exclusive remedy of
the other party shall be to terminate this Agreement in accordance with Section
7.1 and to receive such amounts, if any, as may be payable under Section 7.3. In
the event of the termination of this Agreement as specified in Section 7.1
hereof, this Agreement shall thereafter become void and there shall be no
liability on the part of any party hereto or their respective officers or
directors subject to the following sentence. Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary contained in this Agreement, (i) no party shall be relieved or released
from any liabilities or damage arising out of its willful and material breach of
any provisions of this Agreement; (ii) in the case of the Company, no
termination shall release the Company from any liability it may have to Buyer to
the extent provided in Section 7.3; or (iii) in the case of Buyer, no
termination shall release Buyer from any liability it may have to the Company
resulting from a breach of Section 5.4(e), which liability shall exist
notwithstanding the failure of any Governmental Authority to grant any Requisite
Regulatory Approval to the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby
if such Requisite Regulatory Approval would have been granted but for the
inadequacy of Buyer's regulatory capital. Except as provided in the immediately
preceding sentence, no party hereto shall have any liability to any other party
under the terms of this Agreement, whether for breach hereof or otherwise.
SECTION 7.3. Expenses; Termination Fee.
(a) The Company hereby agrees that if the Agreement is terminated pursuant
to Section 7.1(c) or by Buyer pursuant to Section 7.1(e), the Company shall
promptly and in any event within ten (10) days after such termination pay Buyer
all Expenses (as defined below) of Buyer, but not to exceed $1,500,000.
(b) Buyer hereby agrees that if the Agreement is terminated by the Company
pursuant to Section 7.1(e), Buyer shall promptly and in any event within ten
(10) days after termination pay the Company all Expenses of the Company and the
Bank, but not to exceed $1,500,000.
(c) Except as otherwise provided herein, all Expenses incurred by Buyer and
the Company in connection with or related to the authorization, preparation and
execution of this Agreement, the solicitation of
A-27
98
stockholder approvals and all other matters related to the closing of the
transactions contemplated hereby, including, without limitation of the
generality of the foregoing, all fees and expenses of agents, representatives,
counsel and accountants employed by either such party or its affiliates, shall
be borne solely and entirely by the party which has incurred the same.
(d) "Expenses" of a party as used in this Agreement shall include all
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses (including all fees and expenses of attorneys,
accountants, investment bankers, experts and consultants to such party and its
affiliates) incurred by the party or on its behalf after March 1, 2001 in
connection with the sale of the Company, this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby.
(e) The Company shall pay to Buyer the sum of $5,000,000 (the "Termination
Fee") payable as provided below solely as follows: (i) if this Agreement shall
have terminated pursuant to Section 7.1(d); or (ii) if all of the following
occur: (A) the Company or Buyer shall terminate this Agreement pursuant to
Section 7.1(c) and, at the time of such termination, Buyer is not in breach of
this Agreement, (B) at any time after the date of this Agreement and prior to
the meeting of the Stockholders to vote on the Merger, if any, there shall have
been publicly announced a Superior Proposal and (C) within nine months of the
termination of this Agreement, the Company enters into a definitive agreement
with respect to such Superior Proposal.
(f) The Termination Fee required to be paid pursuant to Section 7.3(e)shall
be paid to Buyer not later than five business days after the Company enters into
a definitive agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal. All payments under
Section 7.3(e) shall be made in cash by wire transfer of immediately available
funds to an account designated by Buyer; provided, however, that in the event
that the Company determines, in its reasonable discretion, that payment of the
full amount of the Termination Fee in cash will, or is reasonably likely to
reduce the Bank's capital for regulatory purposes to a level that would not
provide a reasonable cushion above the amount necessary to remain "well
capitalized" under the Prompt Corrective Action regulations of the OTS, then, it
may cause some or all of the Termination Fee to be paid to Buyer in the form of
a transfer by the Company to Buyer of shares of the Bank Preferred Stock, the
terms of which are set forth on Exhibit 7.3(g) hereto. In the event the Company
determines that such transfer of Bank Preferred Stock is necessary under this
Section 7.3(g), the Company shall, within twenty (20) business days of the date
of termination of this Agreement, transfer such Bank Preferred Stock. In
addition, it is understood that, in the event that the Termination Fee is
payable pursuant to Section 7.3(f), the Company and the Bank shall receive
credit for (and the amount payable by them in respect of the Termination Fee
shall be reduced by) the amount of any payments made by them pursuant to Section
7.3(a).
(g) Upon the termination of this Agreement due to the failure of Buyer to
obtain the Requisite Regulatory Approvals, Buyer shall forfeit the Escrowed
Funds, which shall be delivered by the Escrow Agent to the Company within five
(5) business days after the date of termination. In addition, it is understood
that, in the event that the Escrowed Funds are forfeited and delivered to the
Company pursuant to this Section 7.3(g), Buyer shall be relieved of its
obligation to pay the Company's Expenses under Section 7.3. Payment of the
Escrowed Funds to the Company shall not constitute liquidated damages and Buyer
shall remain liable for damages in accordance with the terms of this Agreement
upon Buyer's willful breach of this Agreement notwithstanding the payment of the
Escrowed Funds.
(h) Notwithstanding any other provision herein, the last sentence of
Section 5.3 and, in their entirety, Sections 7.2 and 7.3 and Article IX shall
survive any termination of this Agreement.
ARTICLE VIII.
EFFECTIVE DATE AND EFFECTIVE TIME
SECTION 8.1. Effective Date and Effective Time. On such date as the parties
may agree, which shall be within five (5) business days after the last to occur
of the expiration of all applicable waiting periods in connection with the
Requisite Regulatory Approvals and the satisfaction or waiver of all other
conditions to the consummation of this Agreement (other than those conditions
relating to the receipt of officer's certificates or fairness opinions), or on
such earlier or later date as may be agreed in writing by the parties, the
Certificate of Merger shall be executed in accordance with all appropriate legal
requirements and shall be filed
A-28
99
as required by law, and the Merger provided for herein shall become effective
upon the date and time specified in the Certificate of Merger, which shall not
be later than the Closing Date (the "Effective Date"). The "Effective Time" of
the Merger shall be the time specified in the Certificate of Merger.
ARTICLE IX.
OTHER MATTERS
SECTION 9.1. Interpretation. When a reference is made in this Agreement to
Sections, Articles, Exhibits or Schedules, such reference shall be to a Section
or Article of, or Exhibit or Schedule to, this Agreement unless otherwise
indicated. The table of contents and headings contained in this Agreement are
for ease of reference only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of
this Agreement. Whenever the words "include," "includes," or "including" are
used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed followed by the words "without
limitation." Any singular term in this Agreement shall be deemed to include the
plural, and any plural term the singular.
SECTION 9.2. Waiver. Prior to the Effective Time, any term, provision or
condition of this Agreement may be: (i) waived by the party benefited by the
provision; or (ii) amended or modified at any time by an agreement in writing
between the parties hereto approved by their respective boards of directors,
except that, after the vote by the Stockholders, no amendment may be made that
would contravene any provision of HOLA or Applicable Law. No waiver of any term,
provision or condition of this Agreement, whether by conduct or otherwise, in
any one or more instances, shall be deemed to be or construed as a further or
continuing waiver of any such term, provision or condition of this Agreement.
SECTION 9.3. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts
each of which shall be deemed to constitute an original, but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
SECTION 9.4. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and
interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware without regard
to the conflict of law principles thereof. The parties hereby irrevocably submit
to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of Delaware and the Federal
courts of the United States of America located in the State of Delaware solely
in respect of the interpretation and enforcement of the provisions of this
Agreement and of the documents referred to in this Agreement and in respect of
the transactions contemplated herein, and hereby waive, and agree not to assert,
as a defense in any action, suit or proceeding for the interpretation or
enforcement hereof or of any such document, that it is not subject thereto or
that such action, suit or proceeding may not be brought or is not maintainable
in said courts or that the venue thereof may not be appropriate or that this
Agreement or any such document may not be enforced in or by such courts, and the
parties hereto irrevocably agree that all claims with respect to such action or
proceeding shall be heard and determined in such a Delaware State or Federal
court. The parties hereby consent to and grant any such court jurisdiction over
the person of such parties and over the subject matter of such dispute and agree
that mailing of process or other papers in connection with any such action or
proceeding in the manner provided in Section 9.5 or in such other manner as may
be permitted by law, shall be valid and sufficient service thereof.
SECTION 9.5. Notices. All notices, requests, acknowledgments and other
communications hereunder to a party shall be in writing and shall be deemed to
have been duly given when delivered by hand, a reputable overnight courier
service or telecopy (confirmed in writing) to such party at its address set
forth below or such other address as such party may specify by notice to the
other party hereto.
If to Buyer, to:
FBOP Corporation
11 West Madison Street
Oak Park, IL 60302
(708) 445-3223 (Fax)
Attention: Michael E. Kelly
A-29
100
With copies to:
Lord, Bissell & Brook
115 S. LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60603
(312) 443-0336 (Fax)
Attention: Edward C. Fitzpatrick
If to the Company, to:
Bank Plus Corporation
4565 Colorado Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90039
(818) 549-3525 (Fax)
Attention: Mark Mason
Chief Executive Officer
With copies to:
Godfrey B. Evans, Esq.
General Counsel
Bank Plus Corporation
4565 Colorado Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90039
(818) 549-3525 (Fax)
and
Dhiya El-Saden, Esq.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90071
(213) 229-6196 (Fax)
SECTION 9.6. Entire Agreement; Binding Agreement; Third Parties. This
Agreement, together with all the schedules hereto and agreements referred to
herein, including the Confidentiality Agreement, represents the entire
understanding of the parties hereto with reference to the transactions
contemplated hereby and supersedes any and all other oral or written agreements
heretofore made. All terms and provisions of the Agreement shall be binding upon
and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective
successors and assigns. Except as to Sections 2.3 and 2.5 which are intended to
benefit the Stockholders and the Optionholders, Section 5.2, which is intended
to benefit employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, and Section 5.13,
which is intended to benefit Indemnified Parties, nothing in this Agreement is
intended to confer upon any other Person (including, without limitation,
employees of the Company) any rights or remedies of any nature whatsoever under
or by reason of this Agreement.
SECTION 9.7. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned or delegated by
any party hereto without the written consent of the other party and any such
attempted assignment or delegation shall be null and void.
SECTION 9.8. Captions. The Article, Section and paragraph captions herein
are for convenience of reference only, do not constitute part of this Agreement
and shall not be deemed to limit or otherwise affect any of the provisions
hereof.
SECTION 9.9. Construction of Agreement. No party hereto, nor its respective
counsel, shall be deemed the drafter of this Agreement for purposes of
construing the provisions of this Agreement, and all provisions of this
Agreement shall be construed in accordance with their fair meaning, and not
strictly for or against any party hereto.
A-30
101
SECTION 9.10. Survival. All representations and warranties shall be deemed
to be conditions of this Agreement and shall not survive the Effective Time.
SECTION 9.11 Attorneys' Fees. If any legal action or any arbitration upon
mutual agreement is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement or because of
an alleged dispute, controversy or breach in connection with this Agreement, the
prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and
other costs and expenses incurred in that action or proceeding, in addition to
any other relief to which it may be entitled.
SECTION 9.12 Knowledge. Whenever any statement herein or in any list,
exhibit, schedule, certificate or other document delivered to any party pursuant
to this Agreement is made "to the knowledge" of any party, such knowledge shall
mean the actual knowledge which any of the officers of the party listed in
Section 9.12 of the Company Disclosure Schedule or the Buyer Disclosure
Schedule, as applicable, as the party's knowledge group has as a result of the
performance of his or her duties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed by their duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above
written.
BANK PLUS CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation
By: /s/ MARK K. MASON
------------------------------------
Name: Mark K. Mason
Title: Chief Executive Officer
FBOP CORPORATION,
an Illinois corporation
By: /s/ MICHAEL E. KELLY
------------------------------------
Name: Michael E. Kelly
Title: Chairman
As of this 7th day of August, 2001,
and
pursuant to the terms of Section 3.4
hereof,
Acquisition Sub hereby agrees to be
bound by the terms hereof.
FBOP ACQUISITION SUB, INC.
By: /s/ MICHAEL DUNNING
-----------------------------------
Name: Michael Dunning
Title: Senior Vice President
A-31
102
ANNEX B -- FINANCIAL ADVISOR'S FAIRNESS OPINION
(SANDLER O'NEILL & PARTNERS, L.P. LETTERHEAD)
August 9, 2001
Board of Directors
Bank Plus Corporation
4565 Colorado Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90039
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Bank Plus Corporation ("Bank Plus") and FBOP Corporation ("FBOP") have
entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 2, 2001 (the
"Agreement"), pursuant to which Bank Plus will be acquired by FBOP through the
merger of a newly formed subsidiary of FBOP with and into Bank Plus (the
"Merger"). Upon consummation of the Merger, each share of Bank Plus common
stock, par value $.01 per share, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the
Merger (the "Bank Plus Shares"), other than certain shares specified in the
Agreement, will be converted into the right to receive $7.25 in cash, without
interest (the "Consideration"). The Consideration is subject to increase under
certain circumstances as set forth in the Agreement. The terms and conditions of
the Merger are more fully set forth in the Agreement. You have requested our
opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Consideration
to the holders of Bank Plus Shares.
Sandler O'Neill & Partners, L.P., as part of its investment banking
business, is regularly engaged in the valuation of financial institutions and
their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions and other corporate
transactions. In connection with this opinion, we have reviewed, among other
things: (i) the Agreement and certain of the exhibits and schedules thereto;
(ii) certain publicly available financial statements and other historical
financial information of Bank Plus that we deemed relevant; (iii) certain
publicly available financial statements and other historical financial
information of FBOP that we deemed relevant; (iv) certain financial analyses and
forecasts of Bank Plus reviewed with management of Bank Plus; (v) the views of
senior management of Bank Plus, based on discussions with members of senior
management, regarding Bank Plus' business, financial condition, results of
operations and future prospects; (vi) the views of the chairman of the board of
FBOP, based on limited discussions with him, regarding FBOP's financial
condition and results of operations; (vii) the publicly reported historical
price and trading activity for Bank Plus' common stock, including a comparison
of certain financial and stock market information for Bank Plus with similar
publicly available information for certain other companies the securities of
which are publicly traded; (viii) the financial terms of recent comparable
business combinations in the savings institution industry, to the extent
publicly available; (ix) the current market environment generally and the
banking environment in particular; and (x) such other information, financial
studies, analyses and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria
as we considered relevant.
In performing our review, we have relied upon the accuracy and completeness
of all of the financial and other information that was available to us from
public sources, that was provided to us by Bank Plus or FBOP or their respective
representatives or that was otherwise reviewed by us and have assumed such
accuracy and completeness for purposes of rendering this opinion. We have
further relied on the assurances of management of Bank Plus and FBOP that they
are not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make any of such
B-1
103
(Sandler O'Neill Logo)
information inaccurate or misleading in any material respect. We have not been
asked to and have not undertaken an independent verification of any of such
information and we do not assume any responsibility or liability for the
accuracy or completeness thereof. We did not make an independent evaluation or
appraisal of the specific assets, the collateral securing assets or the
liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Bank Plus or FBOP or any of their
subsidiaries, or the collectibility of any such assets, nor have we been
furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals. We did not make an
independent evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses of Bank
Plus or FBOP nor have we reviewed any individual credit files relating to Bank
Plus or FBOP and, with your permission, we have assumed that their respective
allowances for loan losses are adequate to cover such losses. We are not
accountants and have relied upon the reports of the independent accountants for
each of Bank Plus and FBOP for the accuracy and completeness of the audited
financial statements made available to us. With respect to the financial
projections reviewed with Bank Plus' management, Bank Plus' management has
confirmed that they have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best
currently available estimates and judgments of such management of the future
financial performance of Bank Plus and we have assumed that such performances
will be achieved. We express no opinion as to such financial projections or the
assumptions on which they are based. We are not attorneys and, as to all legal
or regulatory matters affecting Bank Plus, we have relied on the advice of Bank
Plus' counsel and we express no opinion with respect to any such matters. We
have also assumed that there has been no material change in Bank Plus' or FBOP's
assets, financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects since
the date of the most recent financial statements made available to us. We have
assumed in all respects material to our analysis that Bank Plus and FBOP will
remain as going concerns for all periods relevant to our analyses, that all of
the representations and warranties contained in the Agreement and all related
agreements are true and correct, that each party to such agreements will perform
all of the covenants required to be performed by such party under such
agreements and that the conditions precedent in the Agreement are not waived.
Our opinion is necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to us as of, the
date hereof. Events occurring after the date hereof could materially affect this
opinion. We have not undertaken to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw this
opinion or otherwise comment upon events occurring after the date hereof. We are
expressing no opinion herein as to the prices at which Bank Plus' common stock
will trade at any time.
We have acted as Bank Plus' financial advisor in connection with the Merger
and will receive a fee for our services, a significant portion of which is
contingent upon consummation of the Merger. We have also received a fee for
rendering this opinion. As we have previously advised you, in the past we have
also provided certain investment banking services for FBOP and have received
customary compensation for such services.
In the ordinary course of our business as a broker-dealer, we may also
purchase securities from and sell securities to Bank Plus and FBOP or their
affiliates. We may also actively trade the debt and/or equity securities of Bank
Plus and the debt and/or trust preferred securities of FBOP for our own account
and for the accounts of our customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a
long or short position in such securities.
Our opinion is directed to the Board of Directors of Bank Plus in
connection with its consideration of the Merger and does not constitute a
recommendation to any stockholder of Bank Plus as to how such stockholder should
vote at any meeting of stockholders called to consider and vote upon the Merger.
Our opinion is directed only to the fairness of the Consideration to Bank Plus
stockholders from a financial point of view and does not address the underlying
business decision of Bank Plus to engage in the Merger, the relative merits of
the Merger as compared to any other alternative business strategies that might
exist for Bank Plus or the effect of any other transaction in which Bank Plus
might engage. Our opinion is not to be quoted or referred to, in whole or in
part, in a registration statement, prospectus, proxy statement or in any other
document, nor shall this opinion be used for any other purposes, without Sandler
O'Neill's prior written consent; provided, however, that we hereby consent to
the inclusion of this opinion as an appendix to Bank Plus' Proxy Statement dated
the date hereof and to the references to this opinion therein.
B-2
104
(Sandler O'Neill Logo)
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that, as of the
date hereof, the Consideration to be received in the Merger by the holders of
Bank Plus Shares is fair to such stockholders from a financial point of view.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Sandler O'Neill & Partners, L.P.
SANDLER O'NEILL & PARTNERS, L.P.
B-3
105
ANNEX C -- SECTION 262 OF THE DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
DELAWARE CODE ANNOTATED
SECTION 262. APPRAISAL RIGHTS
TITLE 8. CORPORATIONS
CHAPTER 1. GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
SUBCHAPTER IX. MERGER OR CONSOLIDATION
SECTION 262. APPRAISAL RIGHTS
(a) Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who holds shares of
stock on the date of the making of a demand pursuant to subsection (d) of this
section with respect to such shares, who continuously holds such shares through
the effective date of the merger or consolidation, who has otherwise complied
with subsection (d) of this section and who has neither voted in favor of the
merger or consolidation nor consented thereto in writing pursuant to section 228
of this title shall be entitled to an appraisal by the Court of Chancery of the
fair value of the stockholder's shares of stock under the circumstances
described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section. As used in this section,
the word "stockholder" means a holder of record of stock in a stock corporation
and also a member of record of a nonstock corporation; the words "stock" and
"share" mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those words and also
membership or membership interest of a member of a nonstock corporation; and the
words "depository receipt" mean a receipt or other instrument issued by a
depository representing an interest in one or more shares, or fractions thereof,
solely of stock of a corporation, which stock is deposited with the depository.
(b) Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class or
series of stock of a constituent corporation in a merger or consolidation to be
effected pursuant to section 251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to
section 251(g) of this title), section 252, section 254, section 257, section
258, section 263 or section 264 of this title:
(1) Provided, however, that no appraisal rights under this section
shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock, which
stock, or depository receipts in respect thereof, at the record date fixed
to determine the stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at
the meeting of stockholders to act upon the agreement of merger or
consolidation, were either (i) listed on a national securities exchange or
designated as a national market system security on an interdealer quotation
system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or (ii) held
of record by more than 2,000 holders; and further provided that no
appraisal rights shall be available for any shares of stock of the
constituent corporation surviving a merger if the merger did not require
for its approval the vote of the stockholders of the surviving corporation
as provided in subsection (f) of section 251 of this title.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this subsection, appraisal rights
under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series
of stock of a constituent corporation if the holders thereof are required
by the terms of an agreement of merger or consolidation pursuant to section
251, 252, 254, 257, 258, 263 and 264 of this title to accept for such stock
anything except:
a. Shares of stock of the corporation surviving or resulting from
such merger or consolidation, or depository receipts in respect thereof;
b. Shares of stock of any other corporation, or depository receipts
in respect thereof, which shares of stock (or depository receipts in
respect thereof) or depository receipts at the effective date of the
merger or consolidation will be either listed on a national securities
exchange or designated as a national market system security on an
interdealer quotation system by the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. or held of record by more than 2,000 holders;
c. Cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository
receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a. and b. of this
paragraph; or
C-1
106
d. Any combination of the shares of stock, depository receipts and
cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository receipts
described in the foregoing subparagraphs a., b. and c. of this
paragraph.
(3) In the event all of the stock of a subsidiary Delaware corporation
party to a merger effected under section 253 of this title is not owned by
the parent corporation immediately prior to the merger, appraisal rights
shall be available for the shares of the subsidiary Delaware corporation.
(c) Any corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that
appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any
class or series of its stock as a result of an amendment to its certificate of
incorporation, any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a
constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of
the corporation. If the certificate of incorporation contains such a provision,
the procedures of this section, including those set forth in subsections (d) and
(e) of this section, shall apply as nearly as is practicable.
(d) Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:
(1) If a proposed merger or consolidation for which appraisal rights
are provided under this section is to be submitted for approval at a
meeting of stockholders, the corporation, not less than 20 days prior to
the meeting, shall notify each of its stockholders who was such on the
record date for such meeting with respect to shares for which appraisal
rights are available pursuant to subsection (b) or (c) hereof that
appraisal rights are available for any or all of the shares of the
constituent corporations, and shall include in such notice a copy of this
section. Each stockholder electing to demand the appraisal of his shares
shall deliver to the corporation, before the taking of the vote on the
merger or consolidation, a written demand for appraisal of his shares. Such
demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the
identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to
demand the appraisal of his shares. A proxy or vote against the merger or
consolidation shall not constitute such a demand. A stockholder electing to
take such action must do so by a separate written demand as herein
provided. Within 10 days after the effective date of such merger or
consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation shall notify each
stockholder of each constituent corporation who has complied with this
subsection and has not voted in favor of or consented to the merger or
consolidation of the date that the merger or consolidation has become
effective; or
(2) If the merger or consolidation was approved pursuant to section
228 or section 253 of this title, each constituent corporation, either
before the effective date of the merger or consolidation or within ten days
thereafter, shall notify each of the holders of any class or series of
stock of such constituent corporation who are entitled to appraisal rights
of the approval of the merger or consolidation and that appraisal rights
are available for any or all shares of such class or series of stock of
such constituent corporation, and shall include in such notice a copy of
this section; provided that, if the notice is given on or after the
effective date or the merger or consolidation, such notice shall be given
by the surviving or resulting corporation to all such holders of any class
or series of stock of a constituent corporation that are entitled to
appraisal rights. Such notice may, and, if given on or after the effective
date of the merger or consolidation, shall, also notify such stockholders
of the effective date of the merger or consolidation. Any stockholder
entitled to appraisal rights may, within 20 days after the date of mailing
of such notice, demand in writing from the surviving or resulting
corporation the appraisal of such holder's shares. Such demand will be
sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the identity of the
stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to demand the
appraisal of such holder's shares. If such notice did not notify
stockholders of the effective date of the merger or consolidation, either
(i) each such constituent corporation shall send a second notice before the
effective date of the merger or consolidation notifying each of the holders
of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation that are
entitled to appraisal rights of the effective date of the merger or
consolidation or (ii) the surviving or resulting corporation shall send
such a second notice to all such holders on or within 10 days after such
effective date; provided, however, that if such second notice is sent more
than 20 days following the sending of the first notice, such second notice
need only be sent to each stockholder who is entitled to appraisal rights
and who has demanded appraisal of such holder's shares in accordance with
this
C-2
107
subsection. An affidavit of the secretary or assistant secretary or of the
transfer agent of the corporation that is required to give either notice
that such notice has been given shall, in the absence of fraud, be prima
facie evidence of the facts stated therein. For purposes of determining the
stockholders entitled to receive either notice, each constituent
corporation may fix, in advance, a record date that shall be not more than
10 days prior to the date the notice is given, provided, that if the notice
is given on or after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, the
record date shall be such effective date. If no record date is fixed and
the notice is given prior to the effective date, the record date shall be
the close of business on the day next preceding the day on which the notice
is given.
(e) Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation or any stockholder who has
complied with subsections (a) and (d) hereof and who is otherwise entitled to
appraisal rights, may file a petition in the Court of Chancery demanding a
determination of the value of the stock of all such stockholders.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within 60 days after the effective
date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder shall have the right to
withdraw his demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the
merger or consolidation. Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger
or consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of
subsections (a) and (d) hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to
receive from the corporation surviving the merger or resulting from the
consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted
in favor of the merger or consolidation and with respect to which demands for
appraisal have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such shares.
Such written statement shall be mailed to the stockholder within 10 days after
his written request for such a statement is received by the surviving or
resulting corporation or within 10 days after expiration of the period for
delivery of demands for appraisal under subsection (d) hereof, whichever is
later.
(f) Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder, service of a
copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or resulting corporation, which
shall within 20 days after such service file in the office of the Register in
Chancery in which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the
names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded payment for their
shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been
reached by the surviving or resulting corporation. If the petition shall be
filed by the surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be
accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in Chancery, if so
ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the time and place fixed for the
hearing of such petition by registered or certified mail to the surviving or
resulting corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the addresses
therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by 1 or more publications at
least 1 week before the day of the hearing, in a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as
the Court deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by publication
shall be approved by the Court, and the costs thereof shall be borne by the
surviving or resulting corporation.
(g) At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall determine the
stockholders who have complied with this section and who have become entitled to
appraisal rights. The Court may require the stockholders who have demanded an
appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to
submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery for notation
thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any stockholder
fails to comply with such direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to
such stockholder.
(h) After determining the stockholders entitled to an appraisal, the Court
shall appraise the shares, determining their fair value exclusive of any element
of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger or
consolidation, together with a fair rate of interest, if any, to be paid upon
the amount determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value, the
Court shall take into account all relevant factors. In determining the fair rate
of interest, the Court may consider all relevant factors, including the rate of
interest which the surviving or resulting corporation would have had to pay to
borrow money during the pendency of the proceeding. Upon application by the
surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder entitled to participate
in the appraisal proceeding, the Court may, in its discretion, permit discovery
or other pretrial proceedings and may proceed to trial upon the appraisal prior
to the final determination of the stockholder entitled to an appraisal. Any
stockholder whose name appears on the list filed by the surviving or
C-3
108
resulting corporation pursuant to subsection (f) of this section and who has
submitted his certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery, if such is
required, may participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally
determined that he is not entitled to appraisal rights under this section.
(i) The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of the shares,
together with interest, if any, by the surviving or resulting corporation to the
stockholders entitled thereto. Interest may be simple or compound, as the Court
may direct. Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case of
holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of holders of shares
represented by certificates upon the surrender to the corporation of the
certificates representing such stock. The Court's decree may be enforced as
other decrees in the Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving
or resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any state.
(j) The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the Court and taxed
upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon
application of a stockholder, the Court may order all or a portion of the
expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal
proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and the
fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all
the shares entitled to an appraisal.
(k) From and after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, no
stockholder who has demanded his appraisal rights as provided in subsection (d)
of this section shall be entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to
receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except
dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of record at a date
which is prior to the effective date of the merger or consolidation); provided,
however, that if no petition for an appraisal shall be filed within the time
provided in subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder shall deliver
to the surviving or resulting corporation a written withdrawal of his demand for
an appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation, either within 60
days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation as provided in
subsection (e) of this section or thereafter with the written approval of the
corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal shall cease.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Court of Chancery
shall be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of the Court, and
such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just.
(l) The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to which the
shares of such objecting stockholders would have been converted had they
assented to the merger or consolidation shall have the status of authorized and
unissued shares of the surviving or resulting corporation.
C-4
109
ANNEX D -- AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
CHARTER AND POWERS OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
ORGANIZATION
This Charter of the Audit Committee was created to serve as a guideline for
the Committee. On an annual basis the Board of Directors appoints the Audit
Committee (the Committee).
The Committee shall be comprised of at least three directors who are
independent of management. A member of the Committee who receives compensation
from the Company solely for his or her service on the Board or who receives
benefits under a tax qualified retirement plan shall be considered independent.
All Committee members shall be financially literate, with at least one
member having had past employment experience in finance or accounting, a
professional certification in accounting or any other comparable experience or
background. This experience should include a current or past position as a chief
executive officer or financial officer or other senior officer with financial
oversight responsibilities.
STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES
The Committee provides assistance to the Board of Directors in fulfilling
its responsibilities relating to the reliability and integrity of the accounting
policies, financial reporting and financial disclosure. In conjunction with
counsel and the independent auditor, the Committee will review, as it deems
appropriate, the adequacy of and compliance with applicable laws, regulations
and company policies relating to accounting, financial reporting and financial
disclosure.
While the Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in this
Charter, it is not the duty of the Committee to plan or conduct audits or to
determine that the Company's financial statements are complete and accurate and
are in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). This is
the responsibility of management and the independent auditor. The Committee is
not responsible to conduct investigations to resolve disagreements, if any,
between management and the independent auditor or to assure compliance with laws
and regulations.
The Committee shall have, but is not limited to, the following duties and
responsibilities:
1. Make regular reports to the Board of Directors. The Committee will
hold regular meetings and special meetings as may be called by the Chairman
of the Committee. At the request of the independent auditor, which firm is
ultimately accountable to the Committee and the Board, a meeting may be
held.
2. Review the performance of the independent auditor and make
recommendations to the Board regarding their appointment or termination.
3. Review with the Board or management, the independent auditor's and
internal auditor's significant risks, exposures, audit activities,
significant audit findings and management responses.
4. Review with the independent auditor and management their assessment
of the quarterly and annual financial statements prior to their release.
5. Review and approve the range and cost of audit and non-audit
services performed by the independent auditor.
6. Review the Company's audited financial statements and the
independent auditor's opinion given with respect to the financial
statements, including reviewing the nature and extent of any significant
changes in accounting principles or the application of an accounting
principle(s).
7. Obtain from the independent auditor and internal auditor, their
recommendations, if any, regarding internal controls and other matters
relating to the accounting procedures and the books and records of the
Company and its subsidiaries and reviewing the correction of controls
deemed to be deficient, if any.
D-1
110
8. Provide an independent, direct line of communication between the
Board, internal auditor and independent auditor.
9. Review major changes to the Company's auditing and accounting
principles and practices as suggested by the independent auditor, internal
auditor or management.
10. Review with appropriate Company personnel, the actions taken to
ensure compliance with the Company's Ethics Policy and Conflict of Interest
Policy.
11. Receive and review the independence ISB statement No. 1
certificate each year from the independent auditor regarding its
independence, discuss such reports with the independent auditor, and if so
determined by the Committee, recommend that the Board of Directors take
appropriate action to satisfy itself of the independence of the auditor.
12. Review the appointment or replacement of the Director of Internal
Audit.
13. Retain special legal, accounting or other consultants to advise
the Committee. As needed, the Committee may request any officer or employee
of the Company or the Company's outside counsel or independent auditor to
attend a meeting of the Committee or to meet with any members of, or
consultants to, the Committee for matters that may have a material impact
on the financial statements, or the Company's compliance policies.
14. Review and approve the internal audit plan and determine that the
plan is based upon an adequate risk-assessment methodology.
15. Advise the Board of Directors, at least quarterly, with respect to
the Company's coverage of the audit plan and compliance with applicable
laws and regulations.
16. Review and assess the adequacy of this Charter no less than once
each calendar year and propose to the Board any recommended changes.
17. Prepare the Audit Committee Report required by the rules of the
SEC to be included in the Company's annual proxy statement.*
18. Discuss with the independent auditor the matters required to be
discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 relating to the conduct
of the audit.
19. Review with the independent auditor any problems or difficulties
the auditor may have encountered and any management letter provided by the
auditor and the Company's response to that letter. Such review should
include --
- Any difficulties encountered in the course of the audit work,
including any restrictions on the scope of activities or access to
required information.
- Any changes required in the planned scope of the internal audit.
- The internal audit department responsibilities, budget and
staffing.
- ---------------
* The new Securities & Exchange Commissions (SEC) rules require companies to
include reports of their Audit Committees in their proxy statements. In the
report, the Audit Committee must state whether the audit committee has: (i)
reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management; (ii)
discussed with the independent auditor the matters required to be discussed by
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 as may be modified or supplemented and
(iii) received from the independent auditor, disclosures regarding the
accountants' independence. The report must also include a statement by the
Audit Committee, whether based on the review and discussions above that the
Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited
financial statements be included in the Company's annual filing 10-K.
D-2
111
X FOLD AND DETACH HERE X
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BANK PLUS CORPORATION
PROXY SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS SEPTEMBER 12, 2001
The undersigned stockholder of Bank Plus Corporation acknowledges receipt of the
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Bank Plus Corporation dated August
9, 2001 and the accompanying Proxy Statement and hereby appoints Godfrey Evans
and Jim Stutz, and each of them, as attorneys, agents and proxies of the
undersigned (each with full power to act alone and with full power of
substitution) to vote in the name and on behalf of the undersigned at the annual
meeting of stockholders of Bank Plus to be held on September 12, 2001 at 10:00
a.m. local time, at 4565 Colorado Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90039, and
at all adjournments or postponements thereof, all of the shares of common stock
of the Bank Plus that the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally
present, with the powers the undersigned would possess if personally present.
To vote in accordance with the Bank Plus board of directors' recommendations,
just sign below; no boxes need to be checked. Unless marked otherwise, this
proxy will be voted FOR approval of the merger, FOR the nominees for director
listed below and in the discretion of the proxy holder on all other matters.
TO VOTE: MARK, SIGN AND DATE YOUR
PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE.
(CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON THE REVERSE SIDE.)
112
X FOLD AND DETACH HERE X
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[X] Please mark your votes as in this example
FOR all nominees WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
(except as marked to the to vote for all nominees
contrary below) listed below
1. ELECTION OF
DIRECTORS [ ] [ ]
(INSTRUCTION: TO WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL NOMINEE WRITE
THAT NOMINEES NAME ON THE SPACE PROVIDED AT THE RIGHT.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOMINEES FOR DIRECTORSHIPS, EACH FOR A THREE-YEAR TERM:
(1) Norman Barker, Jr.
(2) Mark K. Mason
(3) Gordon V. Smith
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE MERGER AND "FOR" ALL OF THE BOARD'S
NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR.
2. APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER dated as of June 2,
2001 by and among Bank Plus Corporation, FBOP Corporation and FBOP
Acquisition Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of FBOP, which provides for
FBOP Corporation to acquire Bank Plus Corporation through a merger of FBOP
Acquisition Sub, Inc. into Bank Plus.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
3. Upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any
adjournments or postponements thereof.
I PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING. [ ]
Address change? Mark box. Indicate changes on label. [ ]
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BANK PLUS BOARD OF DIRECTORS. IT WILL
BE VOTED ON THE MATTERS SET FORTH ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM AS DIRECTED
BY THE STOCKHOLDER, BUT IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE IN THE SPACE PROVIDED, IT WILL
BE VOTED FOR APPROVAL OF THE MERGER AND FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL LISTED NOMINEES
TO THE BANK PLUS BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
PLEASE EXECUTE AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY. YOUR COOPERATION WILL BE
APPRECIATED.
SIGNATURE(S) ________________________________________ DATED _________________
Please sign exactly as your name appears on proxy. When signing as attorney,
guardian, executor, administrator or trustee, please give title. If the signer
is a corporation, give the full corporate name and sign by a duly authorized
officer, showing the officer's title. EACH joint owner is requested to sign.