February 23, 2007


Mr. David R. Humphrey
Accounting Branch Chief
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street N.E.
Mail Stop 3561
Washington D.C. 20549


Re:  Air Methods Corporation
     Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2005
     Commission File Number: 000-16079


Dear Mr. Humphrey,

Pursuant  to  your  comment  letter  dated  November  27,  2006  and  our  phone
conversation on December 6, 2006 with yourself and Kristin Shifflett, as well as
various  partners  from  KPMG  LLP, Air Methods requested a Preferability Letter
from  KPMG  LLP  that would allow the company to change our accounting policy to
reflect our estimated uncompensated care as a reduction of revenue.  Our request
to KPMG LLP for the Preferability Letter was predicated upon some of the reasons
that  we  discussed  in  our phone conversation (i.e. there were other companies
within  our  industry  who  were  presenting  flight  revenue  and  estimated
uncompensated  care on a net basis and some ambiguities within the AICPA's Audit
and  Accounting  Guide,  Health  Care  Organizations  (the  "Guide")  as to what
comprises  "other  adjustments").

From our perspective, the primary ambiguity in the Guide revolves around whether
revenue  and  estimated  uncompensated  care  should  be reflected in the income
statement  on  a  gross  or  a net basis and, as a result, has lead to different
income  statement  presentations  for  companies  operating within the emergency
medical  care  transport  industry.  To  our  knowledge, there are currently two
companies  that report revenue and estimated uncompensated care on a gross basis
and  two companies that report revenue and estimated uncompensated care on a net
basis.  These  two  different  presentations  have  no doubt caused confusion to
investors  as  well  as  others.

Based  upon  our  recent  research  and interpretation of the Guide, Air Methods
believes  that our historical accounting policy is consistent with the Guide and
in  accordance with GAAP.  However, Air Methods believes that the wording in the
current Guide would also support the recognition of revenue net of an adjustment
for  estimated  uncompensated  care,  and further believes that this alternative
method  is  the  more  preferable  method  for  the  following  reasons:



     - Section 1.25  of  the Guide states that revenue should be recorded at the
provider's  established  rates  less the provision for contractual discounts and
"other  adjustments".  Section  5.02  of  the Guide goes on to state that "other
adjustments"  would include reductions relating to legislation or regulation and
to "provider policy or practice". Since Air Methods does not pre-screen patients
or  refuse  service  to  any patient based upon their ability to pay, we believe
that  this  would  qualify  as  an  "other adjustment" pursuant to the "provider
policy  or  practice"  portion of Section 5.02. Air Methods has made a conscious
business  decision to accept patients regardless of their ability to pay as part
of  its  overall  business  operating  philosophy.  Reporting  revenues  net  of
estimated  uncompensated  care  relating  to  this business operating philosophy
would  seem  allowable  under  the  provisions  of Sections 1.25 and 5.02 of the
Guide.

     - "Other  Adjustments"  could  include amounts not expected to be collected
related to estimated uncompensated care.

     - Air  Methods  has sufficient experience to estimate the portion of a bill
sent to an uninsured patient that will go unpaid.

     - Based  on  our research  and  recent  discussions with KPMG, the Guide is
currently  being updated due to certain ambiguities and inconsistencies with SAB
104.  It is our understanding that the updated Guide will address the accounting
for  and  presentation  of  uncompensated  care more specifically.  The expected
release date of the updated Guide is not known at the current time.

In  summary,  based  upon  our  particular  set  of  facts, we believe estimated
uncompensated  care  as  we  provide  it fits within "other adjustments" and, we
believe  that  changing  our  method  from  a  gross  reporting  method to a net
reporting  methods  as  of December 31, 2006 is acceptable.  Commencing with our
December  31,  2006 Form 10-K, we will adopt a new accounting policy for revenue
recognition  pursuant  to FASB Statement No. 154.  Subsequent to this accounting
change,  our  financial  statements  and  all  of our financial information will
reflect revenue and estimated uncompensated care on a net basis.

                   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


As  part  of  this response, Air Methods acknowledges that it is responsible for
the  adequacy  and  accuracy  of  the  disclosure in the filings, that the staff
comments  or  changes to disclosure in response to staff comments in the filings
reviewed  by  the  staff  do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action
with  respect to the filings, and Air Methods may not assert staff comments as a
defense  in  any  proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the
federal securities laws of the United States.

Please  contact  me  at 303-792-7400 if you should have any further questions or
comments.

Sincerely,

/s/ Trent J. Carman

Trent J. Carman
Chief Financial Officer
Air Methods Corporation