UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                  SCHEDULE 14A

      Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange
                         Act of 1934 (Amendment No. __)

Filed by the Registrant |_|

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant |X|

Check the appropriate box:

|X|   Preliminary Proxy Statement
|_|   Confidential,  for  Use of the  Commission  Only  (as  permitted  by  Rule
      14a-6(a)(2))
|_|   Definitive Proxy Statement
|_|   Definitive Additional Materials
|_|   Soliciting Material Pursuant to ss. 240.14a-12

                       FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORPORATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                BMAC CORPORATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

|X|   No fee required

|_|   Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a(6)(i)(1) and 0-11

      (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

            --------------------------------------------------------------------

      (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
            --------------------------------------------------------------------

      (3)   Per unit price or other  underlying  value of  transaction  computed
            pursuant  to  Exchange  Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which
            the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

            --------------------------------------------------------------------

      (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

            --------------------------------------------------------------------


                                       1


      (5)   Total fee paid:

            --------------------------------------------------------------------

|_|   Fee previously paid with preliminary materials:

|_|   Check box if any part of the fee is offset as  provided  by  Exchange  Act
Rule  0-11(a)(2)  and identify the filing for which the  offsetting fee was paid
previously.  Identify the previous filing by registration number, or the Form of
Schedule and the date of its filing.

      (1)   Amount Previously Paid:

            --------------------------------------------------------------------

      (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

            --------------------------------------------------------------------

      (3)   Filing Party:

            --------------------------------------------------------------------

      (4)   Date Filed:

            --------------------------------------------------------------------


                                       2


                       2005 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
                                       OF
                       FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                                 PROXY STATEMENT
                                       OF
                                BMAC CORPORATION

      This proxy  statement  is being  furnished  to the  stockholders  of First
Montauk Financial Corporation, a New Jersey corporation with principal executive
offices at Parkway 109 Office  Center,  328 Newman  Springs  Road,  Red Bank, NJ
07701 (the  "Company"),  in connection with the  solicitation of proxies by BMAC
Corporation  for use at the 2005 Annual Meeting of  Stockholders of the Company,
and any adjournments,  continuations or postponements  thereof (the "2005 Annual
Meeting"), to elect Shlomo Eplboim, Michael A. Poutre and Dr. Eli E. Hendel (the
"BMAC  Nominees")  as directors of the Company and to vote against a proposal to
amend the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

      THE  BMAC  NOMINEES  ARE  COMMITTED  TO  ACTING  IN THE  BEST  INTERST  OF
STOCKHOLDERS.  WE BELIEVE  THAT YOUR VOICE IN THE FUTURE OF THE COMPANY CAN BEST
BE EXPRESSED THROUGH THE ELECTION OF THE BMAC NOMINEES. ACCORDINGLY, WE URGE YOU
TO VOTE YOUR PROXY  CARD FOR SHLOMO  EPLBOIM  AND  MICHAEL A.  POUTRE AS CLASS I
DIRECTORS,  AND DR. ELI E. HENDEL AS A CLASS III  DIRECTOR.  WE ALSO URGE YOU TO
VOTE  AGAINST  A  PROPOSAL  TO  AMEND  THE  COMPANY'S  RESTATED  CERTIFICATE  OF
INCORPORATION.  WE BELIEVE THE SUBMISSIONS FROM THE COMPANY SERVE TO BENEFIT THE
COMPANY AND ITS DIRECTORS, AND NOT THE SHAREHOLDERS.

      BMAC Corporation is a Nevada  corporation  with principal  offices at 7060
Hollywood Blvd.,  Suite 522, Los Angeles,  CA 90028 ("BMAC").  BMAC beneficially
owns an aggregate of  approximately  1,966,700  shares of the  Company's  common
stock, no par value per share (the "Common Stock"),  representing  approximately
13.03% of the 15,324,051 shares of Common Stock of the Company outstanding as of
March 31, 2005,  as reported in the  Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2004.  The  Common  Stock  of the  Company
beneficially  owned by BMAC represents  approximately  11.54% of the outstanding
Common Stock and Series B  Convertible  Redeemable  Preferred  Stock,  $0.10 par
value per share (the "Series B Preferred Stock") of the Company entitled to vote
at the 2005  Annual  Meeting  (the  "Voting  Power").  Unless  otherwise  noted,
references  in this proxy  statement to the  percentage of Voting Power owned by
any person were computed based upon the number of  outstanding  shares of Common
Stock and Series B  Preferred  Stock as  reported by the Company as of March 31,
2005.

      The Company's Board of Directors (the "Board") has announced that the 2005
Annual  Meeting will be held on Thursday,  June 23, 2005 at 10:00 a.m.,  Eastern
Daylight  Time, at the principal  executive  offices of the Company,  located at
Parkway 109 Office Center,  328 Newman Springs Road, Red Bank, New Jersey 07701.
Wednesday,  May 18, 2005 has been fixed as the record date (the  "Record  Date")
for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the
Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof.


                                       3


      The date of this proxy  statement  is May 25,  2005,  and BMAC  expects to
first send or make this proxy  statement  available to  shareholders on or about
June 6, 2005.

      IF YOUR  SHARES  ARE  HELD IN THE NAME OF A  BROKERAGE  FIRM,  BANK,  BANK
NOMINEE OR OTHER  INSTITUTION  ON THE RECORD DATE,  ONLY IT CAN VOTE SUCH SHARES
AND ONLY UPON RECEIPT OF YOUR SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS. ACCORDINGLY, PLEASE CONTACT
THE PERSON  RESPONSIBLE  FOR YOUR ACCOUNT AND INSTRUCT THAT PERSON TO EXECUTE ON
YOUR BEHALF THE PROXY CARD AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

      Any stockholder of the Company who executes and delivers a proxy will have
the right to revoke it at any time before it is voted,  by filing an  instrument
revoking the earlier  proxy or a duly  executed  proxy bearing a later date with
BMAC at 7060  Hollywood  Blvd.,  Suite 522, Los Angeles,  CA 90028,  or with the
Secretary  of the  Company at its  principal  executive  offices at Parkway  109
Office  Center,  328 Newman  Springs Road,  Red Bank, NJ 07701,  or by voting in
person at the 2005 Annual Meeting.  Stockholders who hold their shares through a
broker,  bank or other nominee and wish to vote at the meeting must bring to the
meeting  a  letter  from  the  broker,  bank or other  nominee  confirming  such
beneficial ownership of the shares to be voted.

      If you have any  questions  about giving your proxy or require  assistance
please contact:

                                   Einav Snir
                            c/o Eplboim, Poutre & Co.
                         8383 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 100
                             Beverly Hills, CA 90211

                        COMPOSITION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS

      Based on  information  contained in reports  filed by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission (the  "Commission"),  the Board is currently
comprised of five directors,  divided into three classes (Classes I, II and III)
consisting of two directors each of Classes I and II, and one director presently
remaining in Class III. As of December 31, 2002, Mr. David I. Portman,  formerly
a Class III director,  resigned.  Mr.  Portman's  vacated position has yet to be
filled.


                                       4


         CERTAIN INFORMATION CONCERNING BMAC, THE BMAC NOMINEES AND THE
                     OTHER PARTICIPANTS IN THE SOLICITATION

      Information  concerning BMAC and Messrs.  Eplboim,  Poutre and Dr. Hendel,
each of whom may be deemed  "participants in the solicitation" as defined in the
proxy rules  promulgated by the Commission under the Securities  Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and their affiliates and associates (each a "Participant" and,
collectively,  the  "Participants"),  is set forth  below.  Except as  otherwise
described  herein,  all  transactions in the securities of the Company  effected
within the past 2 years by the  Participants  and their affiliates are contained
in Appendix A attached hereto.

      Each of the BMAC  Nominees has given his consent to be named in this proxy
statement  and any other proxy  statement  for the 2005  Annual  Meeting and has
confirmed  his intent and consent to serve on the Board if elected.  If the BMAC
Nominees  are  elected and take office as  directors,  they intend to  discharge
their duties as directors of the Company in compliance with all applicable legal
requirements, including the general fiduciary obligations imposed upon corporate
directors.  The  information  below  concerning the age,  principal  occupation,
directorships and beneficial ownership of Common Stock has been furnished by the
respective BMAC Nominees.




Name, Business Address       Present Principal Occupation and Principal        Shares of
and Age                         Occupation During Last (5) Years, and           Common         Percent of
                                            Directorships                        Stock           Common
                                                                                 Owned           Stock
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                        
Shlomo Eplboim,              Chief Financial Officer and Chairman of the         0               0.0%
c/o Eplboim, Poutre & Co.,   Board, Eplboim, Poutre & Co. since 2001.
8383 Wilshire Blvd., Suite   Vice President of Investments and Private
100,                         Managed Accounts Coordinator, Prudential
Beverly Hills, CA 90211      Securities 1999 through 2001. Director and
Age 33                       Chairman of the Board, The Blue and White
                             Fund since 2003.

Michael A. Poutre            President, Chief Executive Officer and              0               0.0%
c/o Eplboim, Poutre & Co.,   Director, Eplboim, Poutre & Co. since 2001.
8383 Wilshire Blvd., Suite   Financial Advisor, Van Kasper & Co., 1999
100,                         through 2001.  President and Secretary, the
Beverly Hills, CA 90211      Blue and White Fund since 2003.
Age 33

Dr. Eli E. Hendel,           Doctor of Internal Medicine, Eli E. Hendel,      245,700            1.6%
1500 S. Central Ave.,        MD, P.C. since 1986.  Specializing in
Suite 117                    pulmonary diseases.  Director, Glendale
Glendale, CA 91204           Memorial Medical Group, 1995 through 2002.
Age 52



                                       5


      Messrs.  Eplboim and Poutre are former registered  representatives  of the
Company.  As  registered  representatives,  they were  entitled to a  percentage
commission  and/or fees  generated  in the course of any  securities  sales they
completed.  In  their  former  capacity  as  registered  representatives  of the
Company,  Messrs.  Eplboim and Poutre  participated in, among other things,  the
sale  and  issuance  of  the  Company's  convertible  debentures  to  accredited
investors in 2002 and 2003.

      Messrs.  Eplboim and Poutre have  appeared on CNBC and Fox News,  and have
been  interviewed  in such  publications  as the New  York  Times,  Forbes,  and
Business  Week.  They have also  appeared  countless  times on television in the
greater Los Angeles area.  Morningstar fund rating service has described Messrs.
Eplboim and  Poutre,  founders of the Blue and White Fund  (Nasdaq:  BWFAX),  as
"having a lot of moxie."  Additionally,  Business  Week has stated  that  Shlomo
Eplboim  "certainly can be called a mensch - Yiddish,  for an admirable person."
The Blue and White Fund is the first actively managed mutual fund in the U.S. to
invest specifically in Israeli based companies.

      Messrs. Eplboim and Poutre are currently engaged in arbitration before the
NASD concerning  approximately $100,000, which the Company alleges to be owed by
Messrs.  Eplboim and Poutre.  The alleged  debt relates to  forgivable  employee
loans. The Company  initiated this action against Messrs.  Eplboim and Poutre in
October 2004 and the case is still pending.  Messrs. Eplboim and Poutre strongly
dispute the claims made by the Company and believe these claims are motivated by
the Company's intention to discredit them. Messrs.  Eplboim and Poutre intend on
vigorously defending themselves in this matter.

      Eli E. Hendel,  MD, is a respected  internist in the Los Angeles area. Dr.
Hendel  specializes  is pulmonary  diseases.  Since 1986 Dr. Hendel has been the
sole shareholder and an employee of Eli E. Hendel, MD, P.C., a medical practice.
Dr. Hendel has also served as a director of the Glendale Memorial Medical Group.
Dr. Hendel owns approximately 1.6% of the outstanding common stock of BMAC.

      BMAC acquired an interest in the Company in October 2004 (see Appendix A).
Some  stockholders  in BMAC  individually  acquired  the  Company's  convertible
debentures in 2002 and 2003. Additionally,  some BMAC stockholders have acquired
common stock  separately  (see Appendix A). Taking into account shares BMAC owns
directly, and Common Stock held by BMAC stockholders which BMAC may be deemed to
hold beneficial  ownership over,  BMAC currently holds  approximately  1,996,700
shares of the Company's common stock,  representing  approximately 11.54% of the
Voting Power entitled to vote at the 2005 Annual Meeting as of March 31, 2005.

      BMAC is a Nevada  corporation  with  principal  executive  offices  in Los
Angeles,  California.  BMAC was formed  primarily as an investment  vehicle with
which to acquire shares in the Company,  with a purpose  towards  effectuating a
change in control of the Company.


                                       6


      The President of BMAC is Mr. Amnon Kawa. Mr. Kawa is a retired real estate
builder/developer   who   specialized  in  the   development   of   residential,
multi-family and commercial projects. Mr. Kawa has a thirty (30) year history as
a builder/developer,  which began with the formation Ami Builders Corporation in
1969,  which  specialized  in  the  construction  of  apartment   buildings  and
condominiums.  In  1995,  Mr.  Kawa  helped  found  and  was a  partner  in BEAM
Development,  L.L.C.,  which  developed  residential  and commercial real estate
projects in California and Arizona. Mr. Kawa is a native of Israel and currently
resides in Los Angeles, California. Mr. Kawa is 64 years old.

      Yigal Agaki is the  Vice-president,  Secretary and Treasurer of BMAC.  Mr.
Agaki is 33 years old.  In  addition  to his duties for BMAC,  Mr.  Agaki is the
owner of Hover View Investigations, which he formed in 2004. From 2000 until the
formation  of Hover  View  Investigations,  Mr.  Agaki  was the sole  owner  and
operator of Hover View Helicopters.

      Except as noted in this Proxy  Statement  and in  Appendix  A, none of the
BMAC Nominees,  Participants or their associates is a record or beneficial owner
of  Common  Stock or Class B  Preferred  Stock of the  Company.  Except as noted
above, none of the BMAC Nominees and Participants owns beneficially, directly or
indirectly, securities of any parent or subsidiary of the Company.

      Other than as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, none of the BMAC Nominees
and  Participants  is, and was within  the past year,  a party to any  contract,
arrangement or  understanding  with any person with respect to any securities of
the  Company,  including,  but not limited to,  joint  ventures,  loan or option
arrangements,  puts or calls,  guarantees  against loss or guarantees of profit,
division of losses or profits, or the giving or withholding of proxies.

      None of the BMAC Nominees and Participants has any position or office with
the Company,  and none of the BMAC Nominees has any arrangement or understanding
with any other person pursuant to which he was selected to be a nominee. None of
the  BMAC  Nominees  and  Participants  nor any of  their  associates  have  any
arrangement  or  understanding  with any person  with  respect to (A) any future
employment by the Company or its affiliates;  or (B) any future  transactions to
which the  Company or any of its  affiliates  will or may be a party.  Except as
described  above,  none of the  Participants or their  associates has a material
interest in any transaction or series of transactions  engaged in by the Company
since the beginning of the Company's last fiscal year.

      None of the entities  referred to in this Proxy  Statement  with which the
Participants  and BMAC Nominees have been involved during the past five years is
a parent or  subsidiary  of the  Company  and only BMAC is an  affiliate  of the
Company solely by virtue of BMAC's ownership of Common Stock of the Company.

      Except as set forth herein none of the BMAC  Nominees nor any of the other
Participants:  (i)  owns  any  securities  of the  Company  of  record,  but not
beneficially; (ii) owns beneficially any securities of the Company or any parent
or subsidiary of the Company;  (iii) has any agreement or understanding with any
person with respect to any future employment with the Company or its affiliates;
(iv) has any  agreement  or  understanding  with any person with  respect to any
future transactions to which the Company or any of its affiliates will or may be
a  party;  (v) has  engaged  in or had a  direct  or  indirect  interest  in any
transaction,  or series of  similar  transactions,  since the  beginning  of the
Company's last fiscal year, or any currently proposed transaction,  or series of
similar transactions,  to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries was or is
to be a party, in which the amount involved exceeds  $60,000;  (vi) borrowed any
funds for the purpose of acquiring or holding any securities of the Company;  or
(vii) is  presently,  or has been within the past year, a party to any contract,
arrangement or  understanding  with any person with respect to securities of the
Company.  Other than as disclosed in this Proxy Statement,  no securities of the
Company are beneficially owned by any of the associates of the Participants.


                                       7


      BMAC intends to vote the shares of Common Stock  beneficially  owned by it
FOR the BMAC  Nominees.  BMAC also intends to vote AGAINST the proposal to amend
the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

      WE URGE YOU NOT TO SIGN ANY PROXY CARD SENT TO YOU BY THE COMPANY.  IF YOU
HAVE ALREADY DONE SO, YOU MAY REVOKE YOUR PROXY BEFORE IT IS VOTED BY DELIVERING
A LATER-DATED PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PREPAID  ENVELOPE, OR BY VOTING
IN PERSON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING,  OR BY DELIVERING TO THE CORPORATE SECRETARY OF
THE COMPANY A WRITTEN  NOTICE,  BEARING A DATE LATER THAN THE DATE OF THE PROXY,
STATING THAT THE PROXY IS REVOKED.

                                    PROPOSALS

Proposal 1 - Election of Class I Directors

      According to the Company's Preliminary Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual
Meeting  filed  with the  Commission  on May 6,  2005  (the  "Preliminary  Proxy
Statement")  two Class I directors are to be elected to the  Company's  Board at
the 2005 Annual  Meeting.  BMAC proposes that the Company's  stockholders  elect
Shlomo  Eplboim and Michael A.  Poutre as  directors  of the Company at the 2005
Annual Meeting.  Messrs. Eplboim and Poutre, if elected, would hold office until
the 2008 annual meeting.

      WE  STRONGLY  URGE YOU TO VOTE FOR THE  ELECTION  OF  SHLOMO  EPLBOIM  AND
MICHAEL A. POUTRE BY SIGNING,  DATING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED BMAC PROXY CARD
IN THE POSTAGE PAID ENVELOPE  PROVIDED TO YOU WITH THIS PROXY STATEMENT.  IF YOU
HAVE  SIGNED THE BMAC  PROXY CARD AND NO MARKING IS MADE,  YOU WILL BE DEEMED TO
HAVE GIVEN A DIRECTION TO VOTE ALL THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THE BMAC PROXY CARD
FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL THE NOMINEES NAMED ON THE BMAC PROXY CARD.


                                       8


Proposal 2 - Amendment To Certificate of Incorporation

      The  current  Board  seeks  stockholder  approval  to amend the  Company's
Restated  Certificate of Incorporation,  as amended,  to increase the authorized
number of shares of common stock from  30,000,000 to  60,000,000.  The Board has
stated that it is necessary to increase the number of authorized shares in order
to provide  flexibility to issue shares for general corporate  purposes that may
be  identified  in the future.  BMAC  believes  this proposal is not in the best
interest of  shareholders  as it may lead to a dilution of  interests of current
shareholders.

      As stated above, the Company recently issued to William Kurinsky preferred
stock,  which is  convertible  into  1,978,240  shares of Common Stock.  BMAC is
concerned  that the Company  and Board will use the ability to issue  additional
shares of Common Stock to benefit  insiders,  which is to the detriment of other
stockholders whose interests may be greatly diluted.

      The Board claims that the  proposal to increase  the number of  authorized
shares is not done  with the  intent  that it be  utilized  as an  anti-takeover
device.  Nevertheless,  the Board has set forth  ways in which the  increase  in
authorized  shares can be used as an anti-takeover  device,  such as issuing new
shares of Common Stock to friendly  parties opposed to takeover  attempts.  BMAC
believes that this  proposal is intended to preserve the current  control of the
Company at the expense of shareholders and their investments. BMAC also believes
that a change in control of the  Company is  necessary  to set the  Company on a
path towards  sustained  profitability.  BMAC is also  opposed to any  measures,
anti-takeover  or  otherwise,  that serve to dilute the  interests  of  existing
shareholders.

      WE STRONGLY  URGE YOU TO VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE  COMPANY'S
RESTATED  CERTIFICATE  OF  INCORPORATION  TO INCREASE  THE NUMBER OF  AITHORIZED
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK BY SIGNING,  DATING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED BMAC PROXY
CARD IN THE POSTAGE PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED TO YOU WITH THIS PROXY STATEMENT.  IF
YOU HAVE  SIGNED THE PROXY  CARD AND NO  MARKING IS MADE,  YOU WILL BE DEEMED TO
HAVE  GIVEN A  DIRECTION  TO VOTE ALL THE SHARES  REPRESENTED  BY THE PROXY CARD
AGAINST  THE  PROPOSAL  TO  AMEND  THE   COMPANY'S   RESTATED   CERTIFICATE   OF
INCORPORATION.  WE BELIEVE  THIS  PROPOSAL  SERVES TO BENEFIT  ONLY THE EXISTING
BOARD AND MANAGEMENT, AND IS NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF SHAREHOLDERS.

Proposal 3 - Election of A Class III Director

      As stated above,  as of December 31, 2002,  Mr. David I. Portman,  a Class
III director,  resigned  from the Board  leaving a total of five (5)  directors.
Pursuant to the terms of the  Company's  Amended  and  Restated  Certificate  of
Incorporation  vacancies  resulting from the resignation of a director are to be
filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors "for the
remainder  of the full term of the  class of  [d]irectors  in which the  vacancy
occurred and until such director's  successor shall be elected and qualify." The
remaining directors have yet to elect a successor to Mr. Portman and as a result
have been in violation of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation,
which states that the number of directors "shall be not less than six."


                                       9


      Election of the Class III directors was scheduled to occur during the 2003
annual  meeting  of the  Company.  At that time the Board  failed to  nominate a
second  Class III  director  to be voted upon and fill the vacant  directorship.
BMAC proposes that the vacancy in the Class III directorship be filled by a vote
of the stockholders, which shall occur at the 2005 Annual Meeting. In connection
therewith BMAC is nominating Dr. Eli E. Hendel to serve as a Class III director.
Such election will fill the vacancy existing among Class III directors and bring
the  Company  into  compliance  with its  Amended and  Restated  Certificate  of
Incorporation.

      The election of a Class III director  brings the total number of directors
to six,  thereby  creating the possibility that the Board may deadlock on one or
more decisions concerning the Company's business.  BMAC is unable to provide you
with details  concerning how such deadlocks would be resolved.  Despite requests
for copies of the  Company's  bylaws  the  Company  has  failed to provide  such
documents.  A copy of the Company's bylaws is attached as an Exhibit to the Form
S-1 filed in 1989. It conflicts in many  instances with the terms of the Amended
and Restated  Certificate of  Incorporation,  and in BMAC's opinion,  the former
cannot be relied upon at this time as an accurate  reflection  of the  Company's
governing  statements.  However, New Jersey law provides that a court of law may
appoint one or more  provisional  directors if such  appointment  is in the best
interests of the  shareholders  and  directors.  In the event the  Directors are
deadlocked with respect to a particular issue or decision, with a proper showing
a court may appoint a provisional director to help break such deadlock.

      WE  STRONGLY  URGE YOU TO VOTE FOR THE  ELECTION  OF DR. ELI E.  HENDEL BY
SIGNING,  DATING AND  RETURNING THE ENCLOSED BMAC PROXY CARD IN THE POSTAGE PAID
ENVELOPE PROVIDED TO YOU WITH THIS PROXY STATEMENT.  IF YOU HAVE SIGNED THE BMAC
PROXY CARD AND NO MARKING IS MADE,  YOU WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE GIVEN A DIRECTION
TO VOTE ALL THE SHARES  REPRESENTED  BY THE BMAC PROXY CARD FOR THE  ELECTION OF
ALL THE NOMINEES NAMED ON THE BMAC PROXY CARD.

                  BACKGROUND AND REASONS FOR THIS SOLICITATION

      BMAC  believes  that the market  value and  performance  of the  Company's
Common Stock has been  adversely  affected by a history of poor  judgment by the
Board, officers and management, which is evidenced by (1) attempts to merge with
a financial  services  company  that has a history of  regulatory  problems  and
dubious activities, (2) a pattern of providing excessive amounts of compensation
to members  of upper  management,  and (3) the  inability  to  sustain  positive
earnings.   As  a  result,   BMAC  believes  the  shareholder  base  has  become
disenchanted  with the  Company's  management  and the Board's  oversight.  BMAC
believes  that the  shortcomings  of management  and the Board fall into,  among
others, the following categories:


                                       10


Merger With Olympic Cascade Financial Corp.

      In October  2004,  the Company  announced its intent to merge with Olympic
Cascade  Financial Corp.  ("Olympic").  There are considerable  risks to merging
with Olympic. Olympic has a history of being unable to meet National Association
of Securities Dealers,  Inc. ("NASD") capital  requirements.  It should be noted
that (1) although Olympic thought they raised  sufficient  capital to meet those
requirements,  a NASD arbitration  panel ruled in September 2004 that $1 million
obtained  from  investors  must be returned,  and (2) eight days  following  the
announcement  that the Company  would merge with  Olympic,  the  American  Stock
Exchange  announced  that it  would  delist  Olympic's  stock,  in  part  due to
Olympic's failure to meet minimum-net-capital requirements. Such a move makes it
more difficult for Olympic to raise necessary  capital.  Also of significance is
the fact that in August 2004 the NASD found that Olympic's brokerage  subsidiary
engaged in the  improper  trading of mutual  funds and  suspended  Olympic  from
engaging in such activities.  The brokerage  subsidiary agreed to pay a sizeable
settlement,  but as of the filing of its last annual  report,  less than half of
the total settlement had been paid.

      In a letter to  shareholders  dated May 3, 2005,  the Company  states that
these events and others "were  events  which were  considered  during our merger
negotiations,  and does not impact the value of the merger to our shareholders."
This   statement   evidences  a  lack  of  forward   thinking  and  concern  for
stockholder's  investments  in the Company,  and is not surprising for a Company
with its own history of regulatory  problems.  For example,  in April 2004,  the
Company was fined and suspended from issuing research for three months after the
Company  released a  misleading  stock  report and failed to  disclose  that the
Company owned warrants to buy the stock referenced in such report.

      BMAC believes that the terms of the current merger unfairly favor Olympic'
shareholders.  Pursuant to the original  terms of the merger plan dated February
10, 2005,  for every share of the Company's  Common Stock,  0.5055 new shares of
Olympic  stock would be issued;  effectively  a 2:1  exchange  ratio.  Shares of
common  stock of the Company  and  Olympic  closed at $1.05 and $1.00 per share,
respectively,  that day. On May 11 the Company  announced  revised  terms of the
merger such that the exchange ratio is now 1.75:1. Shares of common stock of the
Company and Olympic closed at $1.05 and $1.25 per share, respectively, that day.
BMAC  believes  that  with the  prices  of each  stock so near in  value,  it is
inappropriate  to issue  1.75  shares of Common  Stock for each share of Olympic
common stock.  This rewards  Olympic  shareholders  with a substantial  premium,
while diluting the interests of the Company's  current  stockholders who receive
no such premium.

      BMAC and the BMAC Nominees  believe that merging with a brokerage  company
that has a history  of  financial  and  regulatory  problems  is not in the best
interests of the Company, its stockholders or convertible debenture-holders.


                                       11


Use of Corporate Funds

      o Background

      In 2003, the Company  offered to accredited  investors the  opportunity to
acquire up to $3 million in  convertible  debentures.  During the last  calendar
quarter of 2003, the Company sold $1.895  million of  convertible  debentures to
accredited  investors.  In its Offering  Memorandum the Company pledged that the
"proceeds of the [o]ffering will be utilized for working  capital  purposes." As
described below, it appears that once the Company became aware of how much money
would be raised through its offering of convertible debentures, upper management
received significant  increases in compensation despite the Company's precarious
financial position.

      In its Offering  Memorandum,  the Company  detailed the  following  annual
compensation  paid to the top  three  executives  in the  Company,  pursuant  to
employment agreements entered into August 2002:

             Name:                                        2002 Compensation:
             --------------------------                   ------------------
             Herbert Kurinsky                                 $181,218
             William Kurinsky                                 $181,218
             Robert I. Rabinowitz                             $150,000

      Despite the fact that the Company realized a net loss of over $3.5 million
for 2003,  documents filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission indicate
that Messrs. Kurinsky received salary increases of $50,000 each during 2003.

      o Excessive  Increases In  Executive  Compensation:  Three New  Employment
Contracts In Three Years

      In December 2003,  when the Company was aware of how much it would receive
through the offering of  convertible  debentures,  the Company  entered into new
employment  agreements  with  its top  three  executives,  despite  the fact the
Company had  executed  employment  agreements  with  Messrs.  Kurinsky 16 months
earlier.  Such agreements  became effective on January 1, 2004, the same date on
which funds from the  above-mentioned  offering became available to the Company.
Pursuant to the new employment agreements,  these individuals became entitled to
base salaries in the aggregate amount of $750,000 (a 46% increase over 2002 base
salaries  and a 39%  increase  over  2003  base  salaries).  The new  employment
agreements  also provided very generous  bonus plans,  opportunities  to acquire
stock options and warrants,  and the award of an additional  375,000  restricted
shares of common stock to each executive.  All of this occurred despite the fact
that the Company lost over $3.5 million for the year.

      In addition to the  increase in base  salaries,  Messrs.  Kurinsky and Mr.
Rabinowitz received annual bonuses of $260,000. Annual bonuses had not been paid
since  2000,  and  even  then  amounted  to just  over  $50,000  for  all  three
individuals. The bonuses paid to Messrs. Kurinsky were sufficiently large enough
to enable these persons to apply a portion of their  bonuses  against debts each
owed to the Company.  In effect,  not only did Messrs.  Kurinsky  receive  large
bonuses during 2003, but debt forgiveness as well.


                                       12


      Increases in compensation and the payment of bonuses were made despite the
fact that the Company was in a deficit position  (corporate  liabilities  exceed
corporate assets) and had suspended the payment of dividends on preferred stock.
BMAC and the BMAC  Nominees  believe  that the  directors  of the  Company  have
continually  shown a tendency  to exercise  poor  judgment in the use of company
funds.

      o Separation Agreement with Former CEO

      In the Form 8-K filed February 8, 2005, the Company provided notice that a
new Chief Executive Officer has been appointed to succeed William Kurinsky,  who
will remain as a director of the Company. The Company states in such filing that
a change in leadership is in the best  interests of the Company  "whether or not
the  merger  [with  Olympic]  is  completed."  As an  additional  reason for the
management  change,  the Company  cited  financial  obligations  that would have
become due to  William  Kurinsky  in the event of a change in  control  over the
Company.

      Though William Kurisnky was not an effective  leader for the Company,  and
despite the fact that the Company  remained in a deficit  position,  the Company
provided him with a significant  compensation  package as part of his separation
from the  Company.  The  Company  is now  obligated  to pay him as a  consultant
$151,200  per year for two  years.  Additionally,  he  received a new class of B
Preferred Shares  convertible into 1,978,240 shares of common stock (effectively
granting him an additional 11.4% vote on Company matters).  The preferred shares
carry the  equivalent  voting  rights of  1,978,240  common  shares,  and pay an
8-percent cumulative  dividend.  William Kurinsky also received a $200,000 note,
which bears  interest at eight  percent  (8%),  and a lump-sum  cash  payment of
$136,000.  It should be noted that he received  other benefits as well including
stock options, health insurance, and entitlement to an annual bonus. The lack of
foresight the Company exhibited in executing a new employment  agreement in late
2003 with William  Kurinsky,  has proved to be a very costly mistake and creates
the  appearance  that  William  Kurinsky has  received a  substantial  financial
windfall in this process. Shareholders should question the judgment of the Board
and management in providing  William  Kurinsky with a new  employment  agreement
that would be terminated soon after it became  effective as well as management's
motives behind such moves. Additionally, shareholders should question whether it
was  appropriate to terminate this contract  before  regulatory and  shareholder
approval of the proposed  merger.  Further,  BMAC believes  that Mr.  Kurinsky's
resignation  does not  represent  a true  departure  from the company and merely
served as an  opportunity  for him to obtain  additional  compensation  from the
Company at the shareholders expense.

      The  Company  has  appointed  Victor  Kurylak  as its new Chief  Executive
Officer.  In connection  therewith,  Mr.  Kurylak  received 1 million  shares of
Company  Common  Stock  and a  new  employment  agreement.  The  new  employment
agreement  provides  Mr.  Kurylak  with a base  salary  of  $275,000,  plus  the
opportunity  for annual  bonuses.  Additionally,  Mr.  Kurylak has recently been
appointed as a director of the Company.


                                       13


The Current Board Lacks Objectivity

      The  current  Board is unable to provide  the  Company  with an  objective
outlook as to the Company's financial and business positions,  nor is it able to
develop an objective strategy for moving the Company toward profitability.

      A majority of the  current  Board  consists  of  insiders  who are related
parties or individuals  subservient to other board members.  Of the current five
directors,  Herbert  Kurinsky  and William  Kurinsky  (who remains as a director
despite  the  termination  of his  employment  with the  Company)  are uncle and
nephew,  respectively.  Recently  employed  Victor  Kurylak  is a member  of the
Company's   management,   and  is,   therefore,   beholden  to  the   Kurinskys.
Additionally, BMAC believes that Ward R. Jones is not an independent director by
virtue of the fact that he holds his securities license through Montauk, putting
him in a position where he is also beholden to the Kurinskys and majority of the
Board.  Effective  December 31, 2002 a sixth member of the Board resigned.  That
position,  which  could have a  mitigating  effect on the  insiders'  ability to
control the Board, has not been filled.

Financial Performance of the Company

      In a letter to  stockholders  dated May 3, 2005,  the  Company  took great
pride in announcing a return to profitability for the first time since 1999. For
the year ended  December  31, 2004 the Company  realized net income of $640,000.
Net losses for the previous three years were  approximately  $3.5 million,  $3.0
million and $5.2  million,  according  to the  Company's  Form 10-K for the year
ended  December  31,  2003.  The  positive  results  for  2004  hardly  rewarded
stockholders  for  the  years  of  continued   underperformance   and  does  not
necessarily   indicate  that  the  Company  is  on  a  path  towards   continued
profitability.  In fact,  the Form  10-Q  filed for the  first  quarter  of 2005
indicates that the Company  realized a net loss of $376,058,  as compared to net
income of $237,974  for the first  quarter of 2004.  The Company  attributes  at
least part of the net loss for the first quarter of 2005 to expenses incurred in
connection with "a separation agreement with one of our senior officers."

Restoring Confidence and Providing Stronger Stewardship

      BMAC  believes  that  significant  new  representation  on  the  Board  is
necessary to restore confidence in the Company,  help bring more  accountability
and  discipline to the way the Company is being managed,  and insure  compliance
will regulatory  requirements.  BMAC believes that the Company's  management and
Board should, in setting and approving executive  compensation,  better tie such
compensation to the Company's  performance,  and in that regard, if elected, the
BMAC Nominees will closely examine and bring  financial  analysis to initiatives
proposed by management of the Company, and if appropriate,  will propose its own
initiatives concerning the Company,  including among other matters, the level of
compensation  of the  Company's  senior  management  and  the  best  uses of the
Company's resources.


                                       14


      If elected, the BMAC Nominees will seek to (1) develop a corporate climate
in which  adherence to  governmental  regulations  is of primary  importance and
install  tighter  compliance  policies,   (2)  link  executive  compensation  to
shareholder returns, and (3) accomplish any other actions as may be necessary to
assure that the  Company's  business  and affairs are at all times  conducted in
accordance with the best interests of its  stockholders.  The BMAC Nominees will
seek to continue  conducting due diligence as it relates to the proposed  merger
with Olympic  Cascade.  The election of the BMAC Nominees to the Board will not,
however,  guarantee  that the  proposed  merger  with  Olympic  Cascade  will be
terminated.  The terms of the merger agreement already entered into with Olympic
Cascade provide that the agreement can only be terminated upon the occurrence of
particular events, most notably, for the Company's failure to obtain stockholder
or  regulatory  approval of such merger.  Termination  of the  agreement for any
other reason may expose the Company to significant liabilities that outweigh any
benefit gained from the termination of the merger agreement.

      The BMAC  Nominees,  if  elected,  will not  constitute  a majority of the
Board,  at  least  until  the  next  annual  meeting  or some  other  change  in
composition  of the Board.  Accordingly,  the slate  proposed  by BMAC,  even if
unanimous,  will not be able to adopt any  measures  without  the  support of at
least some  members of the current  Board.  The slate  proposed by BMAC  should,
therefore,  be expected to articulate and raise its concerns about the Company's
business activities with the rest of the Board members. BMAC may, depending upon
future events, seek to nominate additional directors of the Board in the future.

                       VOTES REQUIRED AND VOTES PER SHARE

      According to the Company's Preliminary Proxy Statement,  a majority of the
Company's  outstanding  shares of Common  Stock and  Series B  Preferred  Stock,
voting  together as a single class, as of the Record Date must be present at the
2005  Annual  Meeting  in  person or by proxy in order to hold the  meeting  and
conduct  business.  This  presence  is called a quorum.  Shares  are  counted as
present at the 2005 Annual  Meeting if you are present and vote in person at the
meeting,  or  if  you  have  properly  submitted  a  proxy  card.  In  addition,
abstentions and broker  non-votes will be considered to be shares present at the
meeting for purposes of a quorum.  Broker  non-votes occur when shares held by a
broker  for a  beneficial  owner  are not voted  with  respect  to a  particular
proposal  because  the broker  does not  receive  voting  instructions  from the
beneficial  owner  and the  broker  lacks  discretionary  authority  to vote the
shares.

      Please complete,  date and sign the  accompanying  proxy card and promptly
return it in the  enclosed  envelope or otherwise  mail it to us. All  executed,
returned  proxies  that are not  revoked  will be voted in  accordance  with the
included  instructions.  According to the Company's Preliminary Proxy Statement,
the election of directors is by plurality vote, with the nominees  receiving the
highest vote totals to be elected as  directors.  Accordingly,  abstentions  and
broker  non-votes  will not affect the outcome of the election of  directors.  A
majority of the shares present and voting at the 2005 Annual Meeting is required
for  approval of the proposal to amend the  Company's  Restated  Certificate  of
Incorporation  to  increase  the number of  authorized  shares of Common  Stock.
According to the Company's  Preliminary  Proxy Statement,  a stockholder  voting
through a proxy who  abstains  with respect to approval of the proposal to amend
the Restated  Certificate of Incorporation or any matter other than the election
of directors to come before the 2005 Annual  Meeting is considered to be present
and  entitled  to vote on that  matter and is in effect a negative  vote,  but a
stockholder (including a broker) who does not give authority to a proxy to vote,
or  withholds  authority  to vote,  on any such matter  shall not be  considered
present and entitled to vote thereon.


                                       15


      Whether or not you are able to attend  the 2005  Annual  Meeting,  you are
urged  to  complete   the   enclosed   proxy  and  return  it  in  the  enclosed
self-addressed,  prepaid  envelope.  All  valid  proxies  received  prior to the
meeting  will be voted.  If you  specify a choice  with  respect  to any item by
marking the appropriate box on the proxy, the shares will be voted in accordance
with that  specification.  IF NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE, THE PERSONS NAMED ON THE
ENCLOSED  PROXY CARD WILL VOTE YOUR  SHARES FOR SHLOMO  EPLBOIM  AND  MICHAEL A.
POUTRE WITH RESPECT TO PROPOSAL 1, AGAINST PROPOSAL 2, AND FOR DR. ELI E. HENDEL
WITH RESPECT TO PROPOSAL 3.

                                PROXY PROCEDURES

      IN ORDER FOR YOUR  VIEWS TO BE  REPRESENTED  AT THE 2005  ANNUAL  MEETING,
PLEASE  MARK,  SIGN,  DATE AND RETURN THE  ENCLOSED  PROXY CARD IN THE  ENCLOSED
POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE.

      IF YOU ARE A  STOCKHOLDER  OF RECORD ON THE RECORD DATE OF COMMON STOCK OR
CLASS B PREFERRED  STOCK YOU WILL RECEIVE A PROXY STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TO EACH
CLASS OF SHARES. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD EVEN
IF YOU  HAVE  PREVIOUSLY  SUBMITTED  A PROXY  CARD  FOR THE  OTHER  CLASS OF THE
COMPANY'S STOCK THAT YOU OWN.

     If you have any  questions  about giving your proxy or require  assistance,
please call:

                                   Einav Snir
                            c/o Eplboim, Poutre & Co.
                         8383 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 100
                             Beverly Hills, CA 90211

      The  accompanying  proxy card will be voted at the 2005 Annual  Meeting in
accordance with your instructions on such card.


                                       16


                              REVOCATION OF PROXIES

      Any  Stockholder  who has mailed a proxy card to the Company may revoke it
before it is voted by mailing a duly  executed  proxy  card to the  Participants
bearing a date LATER than the proxy card  delivered to the Company.  Proxies may
also be revoked at any time prior to voting by: (i)  delivering to the corporate
secretary of the Company a written notice, bearing a date later than the date of
the proxy,  stating that the proxy is revoked;  (ii)  delivering a duly executed
proxy  bearing  a later  date  than the  proxy  delivered  previously;  or (iii)
attending the 2005 Annual  Meeting and voting in person.  Stockholders  who hold
their  shares  through a broker,  bank or other  nominee and wish to vote at the
meeting  must  bring to the  meeting  a letter  from the  broker,  bank or other
nominee confirming such beneficial ownership of the shares to be voted.

      Only holders of record as of the close of business on the Record Date will
be entitled to vote. If you were a stockholder of record on the Record Date, you
will retain your voting rights at the 2005 Annual  Meeting even if you sell such
shares after the Record  Date.  Accordingly,  it is important  that you vote the
shares held by you on the Record  Date,  or grant a proxy to vote such shares on
the enclosed proxy card, even if you sell such shares after the Record Date.

      IF YOUR  SHARES  ARE  HELD IN THE NAME OF A  BROKERAGE  FIRM,  BANK,  BANK
NOMINEE OR OTHER  INSTITUTION  ON THE RECORD DATE,  ONLY IT CAN VOTE SUCH SHARES
AND ONLY UPON RECEIPT OF YOUR SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS. ACCORDINGLY, PLEASE CONTACT
THE PERSON  RESPONSIBLE  FOR YOUR ACCOUNT AND INSTRUCT THAT PERSON TO EXECUTE ON
YOUR BEHALF THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

              CERTAIN INTERESTS IN THE PROPOSAL AND WITH RESPECT TO
                            SECURITIES OF THE ISSUER

      To the knowledge of BMAC,  neither BMAC nor any employee,  shareholder  or
director who may be deemed  Participants in the solicitation of proxies for BMAC
for the 2005 Annual Meeting are or have within the past year been parties to any
contracts,  arrangements,  understandings or relationships  (legal or otherwise)
with respect to any securities of the Company,

      Messrs. Eplboim and Poutre were formerly registered representatives of the
Company. Neither individual has any arrangement or understanding with any person
with  respect to future  employment  by the Company or its  affiliates,  or with
respect to any future transactions to which the Company or any of its affiliates
will or may be a party.


                                       17


                       PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS AND OFFICERS

      Other than itself (whose  shareholdings  are  described  elsewhere in this
proxy statement) and those individuals so stated on the Company's 10-K filed for
the year  ending  December  31,  2004,  BMAC is unaware of any person who is the
beneficial  owner of more than five percent of the outstanding  shares of Common
Stock.  This  information is based solely on information  contained in documents
filed with the Commission by or on behalf of such persons.

                           PROXY SOLICITATION EXPENSES

      Proxies may be solicited by BMAC, its employees,  agents,  directors,  and
shareholders  by  mail,   telephone,   facsimile,   the  Internet  and  personal
solicitation. Regular employees, agents, directors, and shareholders of BMAC may
solicit  proxies on behalf of BMAC,  although  they will not receive  additional
compensation for any such efforts. Banks, brokerage houses and other custodians,
nominees  and  fiduciaries  will be  requested  to forward  BMAC's  solicitation
material to customers  for whom such persons  hold shares of Common  Stock,  and
either  BMAC or the BMAC  Nominees  will  reimburse  them for  their  reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses for doing so.

      The entire  expense of  preparing,  assembling,  printing and mailing this
proxy statement and related  materials,  and the cost of soliciting  proxies for
the  proposals  endorsed by BMAC will be paid by BMAC and/or the BMAC  Nominees.
The  total   expenditures  in  furtherance  of,  or  in  connection   with,  the
solicitation of proxies is approximately $21,000 to date, and is estimated to be
up  to  $33,000  in  total.  BMAC  and/or  the  BMAC  Nominees  intend  to  seek
reimbursement for the costs and expenses  associated with the proxy solicitation
in the event that the BMAC Nominees are elected to the Board of the Company, but
do  not  intend  to  submit  the  issue  of  reimbursement  to  a  vote  of  the
stockholders.

     As of the date  hereof,  BMAC has not retained a proxy  solicitor  nor does
BMAC expect to retain a proxy solicitor.

                                OTHER INFORMATION

      Certain  information  regarding the  securities of the Company held by the
Company's  directors,  nominees,  management and 5% stockholders is contained in
the Company's 2005 Preliminary Proxy Statement.  Information concerning the date
by which  proposals  of security  holders  intended to be  presented at the next
annual  meeting of  Stockholders  of the Company must be received by the Company
for  inclusion  in the  Company's  Proxy  Statement  and form of proxy  for that
meeting is also contained in the Company's  2005  Preliminary  Proxy  Statement.
This information is contained in the Company's public filings.  The Participants
take no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information.


                                       18


                                    IMPORTANT

            1. If your shares are held in your own name,  please mark,  date and
mail the enclosed proxy card to BMAC, in the postage-paid envelope provided.

            2. If your  shares are held in the name of a  brokerage  firm,  bank
nominee or other institution, only it can vote such shares and only upon receipt
of your  specific  instructions.  Accordingly,  you  should  contact  the person
responsible for your account and give  instructions  for a BMAC proxy card to be
signed representing your shares.

            3. If you have already submitted a proxy card to the Company for the
2005 Annual Meeting,  you may change your vote to a vote FOR the election of the
BMAC Nominees by marking,  signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card
for the 2005  Annual  Meeting,  which must be dated after any proxy you may have
submitted  to the  Company.  ONLY YOUR  LATEST  DATED  PROXY FOR THE 2005 ANNUAL
MEETING WILL COUNT AT THE ANNUAL MEETING.

            4. If you are a  stockholder  of record on the Record Date of Common
Stock or Class B Preferred Stock you will receive a proxy statement with respect
to each class of shares.  Please mark,  sign, date and return the enclosed proxy
card even if you have  previously  submitted a proxy card for the other class of
the Company's securities that you own.

      If you have any questions  about giving your proxy or require  assistance,
please call:

                                   Einav Snir
                           c/o Eplboim, Poutre & Co.
                         8383 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 100
                            Beverly Hills, CA 90211


                                       19


                                   APPENDIX A

      The following is a summary of all  transactions  in Company  securities by
BMAC. Company securities are purchased with capital of BMAC.

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Date                       Transaction               Number of Shares
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 October 1, 2004                    Purchase                    980,500
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Note: As stated above,  BMAC represents  that it owns 1,996,700  shares of
Common Stock. The additional shares are owned directly by BMAC stockholders,  of
which BMAC,  for  purposes of this and other  filings  with the  Commission,  is
treated  as  the  beneficial  owner.  BMAC  shareholders  individually  own  the
following amounts of Common Stock:

                           AMVA Holdings, LLC          615,000
                           Zu Freeman                   75,000
                           Dr. Eli E. Hendel           245,700
                           Dr. Meir Agaki               20,000
                           Haim Yanai                   60,500


                                       20


                                      PROXY

           THIS PROXY CARD IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF BMAC CORPORATION
                   FOR THE 2005 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
                                       OF
                       FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORPORATION

      The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints BMAC Corp. and Yigal Agaki
and each of them (acting  alone or  together),  attorneys  and proxies with full
power of  substitution,  to represent the  undersigned and to vote all shares of
common  stock,  no par value per share,  and/or Class B  Convertible  Redeemable
Preferred Stock, __ par value per share of First Montauk  Financial  Corporation
(the  "Company"),  that the undersigned  would be entitled to vote if personally
present at the 2005 Annual Meeting of  Stockholders of the Company to be held on
June 23,  2005 at the  principal  executive  offices of the  Company  located at
Parkway 109 Office Center,  328 Newman Springs Road, Red Bank, NJ 07701,  and at
any  and  all   adjournments,   continuations  or  postponements   thereof  (the
"Meeting"), hereby revoking any proxies previously given, as directed below, and
in their  discretion upon such other matters as may come before the Meeting.  IN
NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THE PERSONS NAMED ON THIS PROXY CARD WILL VOTE YOUR SHARES
(1) FOR SHLOMO  EPLBOIM  AND  MICHAEL A.  POUTRE FOR  DIRECTOR,  (2) AGAINST THE
PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE COMPANY'S RESTATED  CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION,  AND (3)
FOR DR. ELI E. HENDEL TO FILL THE VACANT CLASS II DIRECTOR POSITION.

            PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE ON THE REVERSE SIDE, SIGN, DATE AND
                   RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.


                                       21


   BMAC AND THE BMAC NOMINEES EACH RECCOMMED A VOTE "FOR" THE ELECTION OF THE
   NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSALS 1 AND 3 BELOW AND "AGAINST" PROPOSAL 2 BELOW.

     Please mark votes as in this example: |X|

        STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO DATE, MARK, SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY.
                       YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT TO US.

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       FIRST MONTAUK FINANCIAL CORPORATION

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      1. Election of Class I Directors (please see reverse).

          |_|                        |_|                         |_|
FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED       WITHHELD FROM ALL           VOTE WITHHELD FROM
          BELOW             NOMINEES LISTED BELOW         ALL NOMINEES EXCEPT

      NOTE: If you do not wish your shares voted "For" a particular nominee,
mark the "Vote Withheld For All Nominees Except" box and write the name(s) of
the nominee(s) you do NOT support on the line below. Your shares will be voted
for the remaining nominee(s).

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Nominees for Class I Directors to serve until the 2008 Annual Meeting:

                 Shlomo Eplboim              Michael A. Poutre

      2. Proposal to amend the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase
the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 30,000,000 to 60,000,000
shares.

          |_| FOR               |_| AGAINST              |_| ABSTAIN

      3. Election of Class III Directors (please see reverse).

          |_|                        |_|                         |_|
FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED       WITHHELD FROM ALL           VOTE WITHHELD FROM
          BELOW             NOMINEES LISTED BELOW         ALL NOMINEES EXCEPT

      NOTE: If you do not wish your shares voted "For" a particular nominee,
mark the "Vote Withheld For All Nominees Except" box and write the name(s) of
the nominee(s) you do NOT support on the line below. Your shares will be voted
for the remaining nominee(s).

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Nominees for Class III Directors to serve until the 2006 Annual Meeting:

                                Dr. Eli E. Hendel

      4. IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY CARD HOLDERS with respect to any other
matter which may properly come before the 2005 Annual Meeting. BMAC Corporation
is not aware of any other matters that will be presented at the 2005 Annual
Meeting.


The shares represented by this proxy card when properly executed will be voted
in the manner instructed herein by the undersigned stockholder. If no
instructions are given, this proxy will be voted "FOR" the nominees listed
above.

IMPORTANT: Please sign your name or names exactly as they appear on these proxy
materials. When signing as attorney, executor or administrator, trustee or
guardian, please give your full title as such. If shares are held jointly, EACH
holder should sign. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by a
duly authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by an
authorized person.

WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE 2005 ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE SIGN AND
RETURN THIS PROXY CARD, WHICH MAY BE REVOKED AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO ITS USE.


- ---------------------------------------          ----------------------------
Signature(s) of Stockholder(s)                   Date

- ---------------------------------------
Title, if any



- ---------------------------------------          ----------------------------
Signature                                        Date

- ---------------------------------------
Title, if any