SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. _____)

Filed by the Registrant |X|

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant |X|

Check the appropriate box:

|X| Preliminary Proxy Statement
|_| Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|_| Definitive Proxy Statement
|_| Definitive Additional Materials
|_| Soliciting Material Pursuant to ss.240.14a-11(c) or
ss.240.14a-12

United Heritage Corporation
------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

|X| No fee required.

|_| Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a- 6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:______________________________________________________

(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction
applies:______________________________________________________

(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0- 11 (set forth the amount on which
the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined):__________________

(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:______________

(5) Total fee paid:_______________________________________________

|_| Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

|_| Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1) Amount Previously Paid:_______________________________________

(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:_________________

(3) Filing Party:_________________________________________________

(4) Date Filed:___________________________________________________

UNITED HERITAGE CORPORATION
2 North Caddo Street
Cleburne, Texas 76031
Telephone (817) 641-3681

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Our Stockholders:

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of United Heritage Corporation (the
"Company") will be held on _______________, ______________, 2005, at 10:00 a.m.
(Central Time), at the Company's executive offices located at 2 North Caddo
Street, Cleburne, Texas for the following purposes:

(1) to elect the seven persons listed in the Proxy Statement that
accompanies this Notice to serve as directors of the Company;

(2) to ratify the appointment of Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P., or such other
firm appointed by the Board of Directors prior to the meeting, as the Company's
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2006;

(3) to amend the Company's Articles of Incorporation to revise the purpose
clause;

(4) to authorize a reverse split of the Company's common stock, $0.001 par
value (the "Common Stock");

(5) to approve a sale of the Company's securities to Lothian Oil Inc., as
required by Section 4350(i)(1)(D)(ii) of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules;

(6) to approve the issuance of the Company's securities to Richardson &
Patel LLP, as required by Section 4350(i)(1)(A) of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules;

(7) to amend the Company's bylaws to increase the number of directors;

(8) to amend the Company's bylaws to allow stockholders of the Company to
vote by written consent; and

(9) to transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.

Stockholders of record at the close of business on ______________, 2005
will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and at any
continuation or adjournment thereof.

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in
person. Your vote is important. Please fill in, date, sign and return the
enclosed proxy in the return envelope as promptly as possible, whether or not
you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. Your promptness in returning the proxy
will assist in the expeditious and orderly processing of the proxies and will
assist in ensuring that a quorum is present or represented. Even though you
return your proxy, you may nevertheless attend the Annual Meeting and vote your
shares in person if you wish. If you want to revoke your proxy at a later time
for any reason, you may do so in the manner described in the attached Proxy
Statement.

By Order of the Board of Directors

C. Dean Boyd, Secretary

Cleburne, Texas
___________ ______, 2005

UNITED HERITAGE CORPORATION
2 NORTH CADDO STREET
CLEBURNE, TEXAS 76031
TELEPHONE (817) 641-3681

-----------------------

PROXY STATEMENT

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held _________________, 2005

-----------------------

VOTING AND PROXY

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of
proxies by the Board of Directors of United Heritage Corporation, a Utah
corporation (referred to as the "Company", "we", "our" or "us") for use at our
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the Company's executive offices,
located at 2 North Caddo Street, Cleburne, Texas 76031, on ____________,
____________, 2005, at _____ a.m. Central Time, and at any meeting following
adjournment thereof. The Notice of Annual Meeting, this Proxy Statement and the
accompanying proxy card are being mailed to stockholders on or about
______________, 2005.

A copy of our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 is
included with this Proxy Statement. The Annual Report does not constitute a part
of the proxy solicitation material for the Annual Meeting.

Revocability of Proxy and Voting of Shares

Any stockholder giving a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time
before it is exercised. The proxy may be revoked before it is exercised by
sending a written revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date to
the Company's Secretary at our principal executive offices located at 2 North
Caddo Street, Cleburne, Texas 76031. The proxy may also be revoked by attending
the meeting and voting in person.

If it is not revoked, the proxy will be voted at the meeting in accordance
with the stockholder's instructions indicated on the proxy card. If no
instructions are indicated, the proxy will be voted FOR the approval of all
proposals. We currently know of no other matters to be considered at the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders. If, however, any other matters come before the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, or any adjournment or adjournments thereof, the persons
named in the proxy will vote the proxy in accordance with their best judgment on
any such matter.

Record Date, Voting Rights and Outstanding Shares

The Board of Directors has fixed ______________, 2005 as the record date
(the "Record Date") for determining holders of our Common Stock, $0.001 par
value per share, who are entitled to vote at the meeting. As of the Record Date,
we had _____________ shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote.
Each share of Common Stock entitles the record holder to one vote on each matter
to be voted upon at the meeting. A majority of the shares of Common Stock issued
and outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting will constitute a quorum at
the meeting.

Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the shares
entitled to vote in the election, at a meeting of stockholders at which a quorum
is present. Cumulative voting is not permitted. Unless otherwise marked or
indicated on the proxy, the shares will be voted "FOR" the election of the seven
director-nominees named on the proxy. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater
number of persons than the number of nominees named.

To approve all other proposals brought before the meeting, votes cast in
favor of the action must exceed the votes cast opposing the action. Unless
otherwise marked or indicated on the proxy, the shares will be voted "FOR"
approval of the proposals discussed in this Proxy Statement.

When the proxy is properly executed, dated and returned, the shares it
represents will be voted in accordance with any directions noted on it. Votes
cast by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting will be tabulated by the
Inspectors of Election, in conjunction with information received from our
transfer agent. The Inspectors of Election will also determine whether or not a
quorum is present.

Shares which abstain from voting as to the proposals, and shares held in
"street name" by brokers or nominees who indicate on their proxies that they do
not have discretionary authority to vote such shares as to the proposals
("broker non-votes"), will be counted for purposes of determining whether the
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present at the meeting and entitled
to vote on the proposals has been obtained, but will have the effect of reducing
the number of affirmative votes required to achieve passage of the proposals.

Solicitation

The Company is soliciting your proxy. The cost of this solicitation,
including expenses in connection with preparing and mailing this Proxy
Statement, will be borne by the Company. Copies of solicitation materials will
be furnished to brokerage houses, nominees, fiduciaries and custodians to
forward to beneficial owners of Common Stock held in their names. We will
reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of
stock for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation materials to the
owners. In addition to original solicitation of proxies by mail, our directors,
officers and other employees may, without additional compensation, solicit
proxies by telephone, facsimile and personal interviews.

Delivery of Documents to Stockholders Sharing an Address

The Company will only deliver one Proxy Statement to multiple stockholders
sharing an address unless we have received contrary instructions from one or
more of the stockholders. The Company will promptly deliver a separate copy of
this Proxy Statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy
of the document was delivered upon oral or written request to:

United Heritage Corporation
Attn: Corporate Secretary
2 North Caddo Street
Cleburne, Texas 76031
Telephone No.: (817) 641-3681

PROPOSALS

PROPOSAL #1 - ELECTION OF SEVEN DIRECTORS

The bylaws of the Company currently provide that the Board of Directors
shall be comprised of not less than three nor more than nine members, and that
each director shall be elected to serve until the next Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and until his or her successor shall be elected and shall qualify.
Any vacancies on the Board may be filled by a majority vote of the Board and any
director so elected shall hold office for the unexpired term of his or her
predecessor or until the next election of directors by the stockholders of the
Company.

The names of the nominees for directors and other information about them
appears below. All of the nominees are currently directors of the Company. All
of the nominees have consented to serve if elected. If for any unforeseen reason
a nominee is unable to serve if elected, the persons named in the accompanying
proxy may exercise their discretion to vote for a substitute nominee selected by
the Board. The Board, however, has no reason to anticipate that any of the
nominees will not be able to serve, if elected.

Walter G. Mize
Director since 1987
Age 67

Mr. Mize has served as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company since September 1987. He has also served as
President, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of UHC Petroleum
Corporation and National Heritage Sales Corporation since September 1997, as
President of UHC Petroleum Services Corporation since January 1999, and as
President of UHC New Mexico Corporation since June 1999. He has been engaged in
oil and gas exploration and development, cattle ranching, real estate
development, banking and various other investment activities for over thirty
years.

Harold L. Gilliam
Director since 1990
Age 58

Mr. Gilliam has served as Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company from November 1990 to April 2004. He has been a partner in the
firm of Gilliam, Wharram & Co., P.C., Certified Public Accountants, located in
Cleburne, Texas, since August 1987, and has been a Certified Public Accountant
in the state of Texas since 1972.

Joe Martin
Director since 1988
Age 60

Dr. Martin is an optometrist partner in the Cleburne Eye Clinic, located
in Cleburne, Texas. He has been an optometrist for over twenty-five years. Dr.
Martin is the Company's Assistant Secretary.

C. Dean Boyd
Director since 1988
Age 58

Mr. Boyd has been the Company's Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer since April 2004. He currently serves as a Regional Vice President for
First United Bank, based in Englewood, Colorado and has been with First United
Bank since January 2004 in a senior level position. Mr. Boyd was the principal
of his own financial consulting firm from January 2002 to December 2003. From
June 2000 through December 2000, he served as the Chief Financial Officer and
Asset Quality Officer of the First National Bank Holding Company, Longmont,
Colorado. From January 1999 to June 2000, Mr. Boyd served as the Vice President,
Senior Loan Officer of First National Bank of Longmont, Longmont, Colorado. Mr.
Boyd served as President of Colorado Community First National Bank, located in
Louisville, Colorado, from February 1997 to January 1999, and as President of
Colorado Community First National Bank, located in Fraser, Colorado, from 1988
to February 1997. Mr. Boyd has been a Certified Public Accountant in the state
of Colorado since 1972.

Theresa D. Turner
Director since 1992
Age 45

Ms. Turner has been the Market President of Bank of the West, located in
Fraser, Colorado, since November 2004. She served in this capacity with
Community First National Bank, recently acquired by Bank of the West, since
February 1997. Ms. Turner previously served as Senior Vice President of
Community First National Bank from January 1993 to February 1997, and in various
other capacities since 1985.

Larry G. Coker
Director since 2002
Age 47

Mr. Coker was appointed as a director in March 2002. Mr. Coker graduated
from St. Mary's School of Law in 1990 and is an attorney practicing with Larry
G. Coker, P.C. Prior to attending law school, Mr. Coker was employed as a
petroleum engineer for Exxon Company USA after graduating from Texas A&M
University. Mr. Coker is a member of the Texas State Bar and is also a
Registered Professional Engineer.

Thomas J. Pernice
Director since 2004
Age 43

Mr. Pernice was appointed as a director in April 2004. He founded, and
since 1999 has been the President of, Modena Holding Corporation, a business
development, communications, and political consulting company. Since April 2001
Mr. Pernice has served as a member the Board of Directors and Treasurer and
Secretary of Advanced Biotherapy, Inc., a public corporation, and since December
2002 he has served as a member of the Board of Directors of Universal Guardian
Holdings, Inc., a public corporation. From January 1999 to August 2002, he was
also a consultant and managing director of Cappello Group, Inc., a merchant
banking firm based in Santa Monica, California. Prior to founding Modena Holding
Corporation, Mr. Pernice served as a senior corporate executive in government
and industry for more than 17 years. Most recently, he was Vice President of
Public Affairs and a corporate officer of Dole Food Company, Inc. reporting to
David H. Murdock, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer. He also served in similar capacities for the privately held business
interests of Mr. Murdock, including Castle & Cooke Inc., a real estate company.
Prior to joining Dole Food Company, Inc., Mr. Pernice served in the White House
for more than seven years on the senior staff of the Bush-Quayle Administration
and as a staff assistant in the Reagan-Bush Administration. Mr. Pernice earned a
Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Southern California in 1984.

No family relationships exist among the executive officers and directors
of the Company. Aside from Mr. Pernice, no director of the Company is a director
of any company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or subject to the requirements
of Section 15(d) of that Act or of any company registered as an investment
company under the Investment Corporation Act of 1940, as amended.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE ABOVE-NAMED
INDIVIDUALS TO SERVE AS DIRECTORS.

PROPOSAL #2 - APPROVAL OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Subject to approval by the stockholders, the Board has selected the firm
of Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P. as the Company's independent auditors for its
fiscal year ending March 31, 2006. Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P. has acted in such
capacity for the Company since 1989 and has reported that neither the firm nor
any of its partners has any material direct or indirect financial interest in
the Company.

Representatives of Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P. will be present at the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, will have the opportunity to make a statement if
they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate
questions.

Audit Fees

The following table sets forth fees billed to the Company by Weaver and
Tidwell, L.L.P. during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004
for: (i) services rendered for the audit of the Company's annual financial
statements and the review of its quarterly financial statements, (ii) services
that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the
Company's financial statements and that are not reported as Audit Fees, (iii)
services rendered in connection with tax compliance, tax advice and tax
planning, and (iv) all other fees for services rendered. Tax Fees were incurred
for the preparation of the Company's consolidated tax return and the preparation
of various state income tax returns. All Other Fees in the 2004 fiscal year
included $1,135 related to research and consultation requested by the Company
regarding stock option issues and oil and gas issues, and $2,828 related to
consultations and discussions regarding potential sale of an asset.

March 31, 2005 March 31, 2004
-------------- --------------

(i) Audit Fees $58,968 $42,000
(ii) Audit Related Fees $ 0 $ 0
(iii) Tax Fees $ 4,750 $ 5,275
(iv) All Other Fees $ 0 $ 3,963

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE APPROVAL OF
THE APPOINTMENT OF WEAVER AND TIDWELL, L.L.P. AS INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING MARCH 31, 2006.

PROPOSAL #3 - AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE III OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

We are asking our stockholders to approve a change to our Articles of
Incorporation. As currently drafted, Article III of our Articles of
Incorporation states the purpose for which the Company was incorporated as
follows:

A. The purposes for which this corporation is organized are to engage in
and carry on the business of the research, design, development,
manufacture and marketing of medical, health care and other products, and
to purchase, acquire, own, hold, lease, mortgage, encumber, sell and
dispose of any and all kinds and character of real, personal and mixed
property.

B. This corporation shall have all of the powers granted or allowed by the
Utah Business Corporation Act, as may be amended from time to time, and
all of the powers necessary or convenient to effect any or all of the
purposes for which this corporation is organized.

C. This corporation shall have power to acquire by purchase, exchange,
gift, bequest, subscription or otherwise, and to hold, own, mortgage,
pledge, hypothecate, sell, assign, transfer, exchange or otherwise dispose
of or deal in or with its own corporate securities or stock or other
securities, including, without limitation, any shares of stock, bonds,
debentures, notes, mortgages, or other obligations, and any certificates,
receipts or other instruments representing rights or interests therein or
any property or assets created or issued by any person, firm, association,
or corporation, or any government or subdivisions, agencies or
instrumentalities thereof; to make payment therefor in any lawful manner
or to issue in exchange therefor its own securities or to use its
unrestricted and unreserved earned surplus and/or unrestricted and
unreserved capital surplus for the purchase of its own shares, and to
exercise as owner or holder of any securities, any and all rights, powers
and privileges in respect thereof.

D. This corporation shall have power to act as fully and to the same
extent as a natural person might, or could do, in any part of the world as
principal, agent, partner, general or limited, trustee or otherwise,
either alone or in conjunction with any person, firm or corporation.

Our Board of Directors has determined that the purpose clause included in
our Articles of Incorporation does not provide all the flexibility that the
Company needs to conduct its business. Section 16-10a-202 of the Utah Revised
Business Corporation Act permits a corporation to adopt the following purpose
clause:

The purpose of this corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity
for which corporations may be organized under the Utah Revised Business
Corporation Act.

Our Board of Directors believes that it is in the best interests of the
Company to amend the Articles of Incorporation to delete the purpose clause as
currently drafted and to adopt the more expansive purpose clause permitted by
Section 16-10a-202 of the Utah Revised Business Corporation Act. Based on the
foregoing discussion, the Board of Directors requests that stockholders approve
the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the Articles of Incorporation of this Corporation be
amended to delete the current text of Article III and to replace it in its
entirety with the following:

The purpose of this corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity
for which corporations may be organized under the Utah Revised Business
Corporation Act.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE AMENDMENT TO THE
PURPOSE CLAUSE OF OUR ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION.

PROPOSAL #4 - AUTHORIZATION TO EFFECT A REVERSE SPLIT OF THE COMPANY'S COMMON
STOCK

We are asking our stockholders to authorize our Board of Directors to
amend the Company's Articles of Incorporation to effect a "reverse split" of its
issued and outstanding Common Stock (the "Reverse Split"). It is the intention
of the Board of Directors to effect the Reverse Split as soon as possible after
obtaining stockholder approval. By approving this proposal, the Board of
Directors will be empowered to reverse split the Company's Common Stock by
choosing any ratio (the "split ratio") that is not greater than ten shares for
one share. The determination of the ratio to be used will be made no later than
the third business day from the date of this Annual Meeting, if this proposal is
approved.

Reasons for the Reverse Split

On August 30, 2005, we received a staff determination from Nasdaq stating
that we failed to comply with the minimum bid price requirement for continued
listing. According to Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4310(c), an issuer must have a
minimum bid price of $1.00 per share for a period of 10 consecutive business
days for continued inclusion in Nasdaq.

Decreasing the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding will result in
a proportionate adjustment to the price of the Common Stock, thereby increasing
it. For example, if the Common Stock were trading at a price of $0.75 on the day
before the Reverse Split was effective, and the Board of Directors approved a
split ratio of three shares for one share, then the price of the Common Stock
following the Reverse Split would be $2.25. The Board of Directors has
determined that the continued listing of the Company's Common Stock on Nasdaq is
in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. While the Reverse
Split will result in a decrease of the number of shares of Common Stock
outstanding, it will also result in an increase to the price of the Company's
Common Stock. The Company believes that it meets all of the other requirements
of Rule 4310(c).

Additionally, we have a number of stockholders holding less than 10 shares
of Common Stock. Management believes that these stockholders may be deterred
from selling their shares because of disproportionately high brokerage costs.
The Reverse Split will give stockholders of record who own fewer than the number
of shares equal to the split ratio the opportunity to receive cash for their
shares without having to pay brokerage commissions.

Finally, management believes that the current market price of the
Company's Common Stock does not reflect the Company's value and has a negative
effect on the marketability of the existing shares.

Criteria for Determining the Split Ratio

The primary criteria for determining the split ratio will be keeping the
Company's listing with Nasdaq. Management is required to implement the Reverse
Split to keep the listing, therefore, the split ratio chosen will be that which
will best obtain this objective, as determined by the Board of Directors.

While management anticipates that the Reverse Split will increase its
price per share to allow it to maintain its listing on Nasdaq, there can be no
assurance that the market price of the Common Stock immediately after the
Reverse Split will be maintained for any period of time, or that the market
price of the Common Stock after the proposed Reverse Split will exceed the
current market price.

Effectiveness of the Reverse Stock Split and Mechanism for Share Exchange

If the Reverse Split is approved by the stockholders and effected by the
Board of Directors, the Board of Directors will fix a record date, which shall
be the third business day following the date of this Annual Meeting, in order to
determine the names of the stockholders that will receive notice of the Reverse
Split.

If approved by the stockholders, the Reverse Split would become effective
with the filing of an amendment (the "Amendment") to the Company's Articles of
Incorporation with the Utah Secretary of State.

If the Reverse Split is approved, then each share of Common Stock
outstanding as of the record date chosen for the Reverse Split will immediately
and automatically be changed, as of the effective date of the Amendment, into a
number which reflects the split ratio chosen by the Board of Directors. For
example, if the Board of Directors approves a Reverse Split of ten shares for
one share, then each share of outstanding Common Stock will automatically be
changed, as of the effective date of the Amendment, into one-tenth of a share of
Common Stock. In addition, proportional adjustments will be made to the maximum
number of shares issuable under the Company's employee benefit plans (such as
stock option plans), as well as the number of shares issuable upon exercise and
the exercise price of the Company's outstanding options and warrants.

If the Reverse Split is approved, the number of issued and outstanding
shares of our Common Stock would be reduced in accordance with the exchange
ratio for the reverse stock split. The par value of the Common Stock would
remain unchanged at $0.001 per share and the number of authorized shares of
Common Stock would remain unchanged.

No fractional shares of Common Stock will be issued in connection with the
Reverse Split. Holders of Common Stock who would receive a fractional share of
Common Stock due to the Reverse Split will receive cash in lieu of the
fractional share. The cash payment will be equal to the product of the
fractional share times the average of the high and low trading prices for the
Company's Common Stock over the five trading days immediately prior to the
effective date of the Amendment. The ownership of a fractional interest will not
give the holder thereof any voting or other rights with respect to the
fractional interest, except the right to receive the cash payment.

Management does not anticipate that the Company's financial condition, the
percentage ownership of management, the number of our stockholders, or any
aspect of the Company's business will materially change as a result of the
Reverse Split. Because the Reverse Split will apply to all issued and
outstanding shares of Common Stock and outstanding rights to purchase Common
Stock or to convert other securities into Common Stock, the proposed Reverse
Split will not alter the relative rights and preferences of existing
stockholders.

Provided that the Reverse Split is approved by the stockholders, the Board
of Directors will notify each holder of record with instructions for the
surrender and exchange of certificates.

Based on the foregoing discussion, the Board of Directors requests that
stockholders approve the following resolution in connection with the proposed
Reverse Split:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of the Company hereby authorize the Board
of Directors to amend the Company's Articles of Incorporation to affect a
combination of the Company's issued and outstanding Common Stock using the ratio
x:1, with x equaling any number up to and including ten, which number shall be
chosen by the Board of Directors in its discretion (the "Reverse Split").

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" AUTHORIZING
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO EFFECT THE REVERSE SPLIT.

PROPOSAL #5 - APPROVAL OF SALE OF SECURITIES TO LOTHIAN OIL INC.

On August 10, 2005, the Company signed a letter of intent (the "Company
Letter of Intent") with Lothian Oil Inc. (referred to in this discussion as
"Lothian"). On the same day, Walter G. Mize, our President, Chief Executive
Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and largest stockholder, along with
six other stockholders, also signed a letter of intent (the "Stockholder Letter
of Intent") with Lothian. Neither the Company Letter of Intent nor the
Stockholder Letter of Intent is binding on the parties.

Pursuant to the Company Letter of Intent, we have agreed to sell to
Lothian 3,280,000 shares of our Common Stock at a price of $1.05 per share for a
total purchase price of $3,444,000. We have also agreed to issue three warrants
to Lothian. One warrant would permit Lothian, for a period of five years from
the date the warrant is issued, to purchase 2,860,000 shares of Common Stock
from us at a price of $1.05. The second warrant would permit Lothian, for a
period of five years from the date the warrant is issued, to purchase 3,000,000
shares of Common Stock from us at a price of $1.12 per share. The third warrant
would permit Lothian, for a period of five years from the date the warrant is
issued, to purchase 2,860,000 shares of Common Stock from us at a price of $1.25
per share.

The funds received by us for the purchase price, namely $3,444,000, will
be used to pay down the line of credit advanced to us by Almac Financial
Corporation, an entity owned and controlled by Walter G. Mize.

As a condition to closing the sale of our Common Stock to Lothian, we must
enter into a development and operating agreement with Lothian. Under the terms
of the development and operating agreement, Lothian will invest no less than $4
million and no more than $6.5 million in exchange for a 70% working interest in
our oil and gas properties (subject to any rights that were granted to Dominion
Oklahoma Texas Exploration & Production, Inc. pursuant to a Letter Agreement and
Term Assignment, as amended, that was signed on April 20, 2005 with our
wholly-owned subsidiary, UHC Petroleum Corporation).

We have agreed in the Company Letter of Intent to take any actions
necessary to retain our listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market.

Pursuant to the Stockholder Letter of Intent, seven of our stockholders,
including Walter G. Mize, (collectively, the "Selling Stockholders") agreed to
sell, and have already sold, a total of 8,000,000 shares of the Company's Common
Stock (the "Selling Stockholders' Common Stock") to Lothian at a price of
$1.331375 per share for a total of $10,651,000. The purchase price was paid with
a promissory note. Mr. Mize owned a total of 5,080,590 shares of the Selling
Stockholders' Common Stock and will receive, upon payment of the promissory note
issued by Lothian to the Selling Stockholders, $6,764,171 (not including
interest) as a result of this transaction.

The Selling Stockholders' Common Stock will secure the payment of the
purchase price.

During the period that the Selling Stockholders retain the Selling
Stockholders' Common Stock as security and so long as there is no default under
the promissory note, Lothian will be entitled to vote the Selling Stockholders'
Common Stock and to receive distributions, such as dividends, that we make with
respect to the Selling Stockholders' Common Stock.

Members of our Board of Directors and our officers will continue to
provide services to us in these capacities following this transaction.

Lothian is an oil and gas exploration and development company founded in
2004. Lothian finds and exploits oil and gas properties that have unrecognized
value. Headquartered in New York, Lothian has offices in Midland, Texas,
Artesia, New Mexico and Aden, Republic of Yemen and is developing and operating
oil and gas properties in the Permian Basin and the Republic of Yemen.

Lothian currently operates oil and gas properties in New Mexico. Its
development activities include bringing on-line shut-in wells, reperforating
existing wells, infill drilling programs, waterfloods and pilot projects in
developing reserves. Aside from 12 management and support employees, Lothian
also employs four fully staffed pulling rig crews for the primary purpose of
re-working existing fields.

To date we have been unable, even with money raised through sales of our
equity securities and loans, to develop our oil and gas properties so that we
can operate profitably. We believe that this investment by Lothian, including
the development and operating agreement, shows its commitment to the development
of our oil and gas properties. Permitting Lothian to purchase the Common Stock
and warrants from United Heritage gives Lothian a significant stake in our
operations, provides an incentive to Lothian to develop our properties and
aligns Lothian's interests with the interests of our other stockholders.

Reason for the Proposal

Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350(i)(1)(D)(ii) states that we must obtain
stockholder approval of any transaction other than a public offering pursuant to
which "the sale, issuance or potential issuance by the issuer of common stock
(or securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock) at a price less
than the greater of book or market value . . . equals 20% or more of common
stock or 20% or more of the voting power outstanding before the issuance." We
are seeking stockholder approval to sell, in a transaction that does not qualify
as a public offering of the Company's securities for the purpose of Rule
4350(i)(1)(D)(ii), a total of 3,280,000 newly issued shares of the Company's
Common Stock and warrants to purchase an additional 8,720,000 shares of
newly-issued Common Stock. If the warrants were exercised, this transaction
would represent a transfer of 12,000,000 shares of Common Stock to Lothian. As
of the Record Date, the Company had issued and outstanding ___________ shares of
Common Stock. 20% of the Company's issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock
would equal _____________ shares.

Overall Effect of the Proposal

If the transaction with Lothian is approved, Lothian will be the Company's
largest stockholder and will own a majority of the issued and outstanding shares
of the Company's Common Stock. If the transaction with Lothian is approved,
Lothian and the Company will also enter into a definitive development and
operating agreement pursuant to which Lothian will invest no less than $4
million and will receive a 70% working interest in the Company's oil and gas
producing properties, subject to any rights transferred by the Company to
Dominion Oklahoma Texas Exploration & Production, Inc.

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Proposal.

By entering into this transaction, the Company will receive an immediate
cash infusion of $3,444,000 as a result of Lothian's purchase of Common Stock,
which will repay its existing debt to Almac Financial Corporation, which is
owned by Walter G. Mize, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board of Directors, and it will receive an additional $4 million for the
development and operating agreement. The Company believes that Lothian will have
the resources to invest in the development of the Company's oil and gas
properties.

If Lothian becomes the holder of a majority of the Company's Common Stock,
it will not only be able to elect the Company's Board of Directors, but it will
be able to prevent the remaining stockholders from removing members of the
Board. Furthermore, the remaining stockholders will not have enough votes to
either approve or disapprove a merger or other extraordinary corporate
transaction, even if it would be in their best interests. Finally, the issuance
of additional shares of Common Stock by the Company to Lothian will dilute the
percentage ownership of existing stockholders.

Vote by the Board of Directors.

On September 7, 2005, the Board of Directors voted to affirm and approve
the Company Letter of Intent.

Based on the foregoing discussion, the Board of Directors requests that
stockholders approve the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that in accordance with Rule 4350(i)(1)(D)(ii) of the Nasdaq
Marketplace Rules, the stockholders of the Company hereby authorize the Board of
Directors to sell, in a transaction that does not qualify as a public offering
of the Company's securities for the purpose of Rule 4350(i)(1)(D)(ii), a total
of 3,280,000 shares of Common Stock and Warrants that may be exercised for an
additional 8,720,000 shares of Common Stock to Lothian Oil Inc. in accordance
with the terms and conditions of the Company Letter of Intent (as the number of
shares of Common Stock and the number of shares of Common Stock underlying the
Warrants and the price per share for such purchase may be adjusted in accordance
with the Reverse Split).

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE SALE OF
THE COMPANY'S COMMON STOCK TO LOTHIAN OIL INC.

PROPOSAL #6 - APPROVAL OF ISSUANCE OF SECURITIES TO RICHARDSON & PATEL LLP.

On occasion, in order to conserve our cash resources, we agree to pay
consultants and others rendering services to us with our securities. On April
20, 2004 our Board of Directors approved the issuance of 222,222 shares of our
Common Stock and a warrant for the purchase of an additional 222,222 shares of
our Common Stock to our attorneys, Richardson & Patel LLP. Together, the Common
Stock and the warrant are referred to in this discussion as the "Securities".
The warrant will have an exercise price of $0.50 per share and a term of ten
years. We agreed to issue the Securities in full payment of legal services that
were rendered to us by Richardson & Patel LLP. The number of shares of Common
Stock, the number of warrant shares to be issued and the exercise price for the
warrant shares were determined by negotiation. There are no other terms to this
compensation plan and no other person is entitled to participate in it. The
market value of our Common Stock on the Record Date was $________ per share.

The warrant granted to Richardson & Patel LLP does not have a readily
ascertainable fair market value, therefore Richardson & Patel LLP did not
recognize any taxable income at the time a warrant was granted. However, upon
exercise of the warrant, Richardson & Patel LLP will include in ordinary income
an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares on
the date of exercise and the exercise price. If Richardson & Patel LLP sells the
shares it receives upon exercise of the warrant, any subsequent appreciation or
depreciation in the value of the shares will be treated as capital gain or loss.

There is no tax consequence to us resulting from the grant of this
warrant.

Reason for the Proposal

Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350(i)(1)(A) states that we must obtain
stockholder approval of any equity compensation arrangement pursuant to which
stock may be acquired by consultants.

Overall Effect of the Proposal

On the Record Date, we had ____________ shares of Common Stock
outstanding. If our stockholders approve the issuance of the Securities to
Richardson & Patel LLP, the overall effect will be to immediately dilute our
remaining stockholders by an additional 222,222 shares. If Richardson & Patel
LLP were to exercise the warrant, our remaining stockholders would be diluted by
the issuance of an additional 222,222 shares. Richardson & Patel LLP is not
required to exercise the warrant.

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Proposal

Once the Securities are issued, a major creditor will be paid and a
contractual obligation discharged. However, by issuing the Securities, our
remaining stockholders are diluted.

Vote by the Board of Directors.

On April 20, 2004, the Board of Directors voted to issue the Securities to
Richardson & Patel LLP. and requests that stockholders approve the following
resolution:

RESOLVED, that in accordance with Rule 4350(i)(1)(A) of the Nasdaq
Marketplace Rules, the stockholders of the Company hereby authorize the Board of
Directors to issue to Richardson & Patel LLP 222,222 shares of United Heritage
Corporation Common Stock and a warrant for the purchase of an additional 222,222
shares of United Heritage Corporation Common Stock (as the number of shares of
Common Stock and the number of shares of Common Stock underlying the warrant may
be adjusted in accordance with the Reverse Split).

PROPOSAL #7 - AMENDMENT OF THE COMPANY'S BYLAWS TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF
DIRECTORS.

The Company currently has seven directors. Section 2 of Article III of the
Company's bylaws states, "The number of Directors of the corporation shall be
not less than three (3) nor more than nine (9)." The Company wishes to amend
this sentence to state, "The number of Directors of the corporation shall be not
less than three (3) nor more than eleven (11)."

Reason for the Proposal

In the event that stockholders approve the transaction with Lothian,
Lothian wishes to appoint four members to the Board of Directors. Four
additional Board members will bring the total to 11, which would exceed the
limit imposed by Section 2, Article III of the bylaws.

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Proposal

A larger Board will provide more depth to the Company's management. We do
not believe that there is any disadvantage to having a larger Board.

Vote by Board of Directors

On September 7, 2005, our Board of Directors voted to amend the Company's
bylaws to allow a maximum of 11 individuals to be included on our Board of
Directors.

Based on the foregoing discussion, the Board of Directors requests that
stockholders approve the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the first sentence of Section 2, Article III of the
Company's bylaws be amended to state the following:

"The number of Directors of the corporation shall be not less than three
(3) nor more than eleven (11)."

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE AMENDMENT TO
SECTION 2 OF ARTICLE III OF THE COMPANY'S BYLAWS

PROPOSAL #8 - AMENDMENT OF THE COMPANY'S BYLAWS TO ALLOW STOCKHOLDERS TO VOTE BY
WRITTEN CONSENT.

The Company was incorporated in 1984. At that time, Utah law governing
corporations permitted action by written consent of stockholders only so long as
all of the stockholders entitled to vote with respect to the subject matter of
the resolution signed the written consent. In 1992, the legislature enacted the
Utah Revised Business Corporation Act, including Section 16-10a-704 thereunder,
which permitted stockholder action to be taken by written consent so long as one
or more consents in writing are signed by the holders of outstanding shares
having not less than the minimum number of votes necessary to authorize or take
the action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote were present and
voted.

However, included in the Utah Revised Business Corporation Act is Section
16-10a-1704 which states, "The provisions of Section 16-10a-704 may not operate
to permit a corporation in existence prior to July 1, 1992, to take action by
the written consent of fewer than all of the stockholders entitled to vote with
respect to the subject matter of the action, until the date a resolution
providing otherwise is approved either (a) by a consent in writing, setting
forth the proposed resolution, signed by all of the stockholders entitled to
vote with respect to the subject matter of the resolution; or (b) at a duly
convened meeting of stockholders, by the vote of the same percentage of
stockholders of each voting group as would be required to include the resolution
in an amendment to the corporation's articles of incorporation."

Reason for the Proposal

The requirement of Section 16-10a-1704 of the Utah Revised Business
Corporation Act, which requires each and every stockholder entitled to vote on a
proposal to sign a written consent, is outdated and cumbersome. There is no
reason that voting requirements for actions taken by written consent should be
unanimous when the unanimous approval of stockholders voting on proposals at an
annual or special meeting is not required.

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Proposal

Voting by written consent can be a convenient way for the Company to
solicit votes. In the Company's experience, stockholder meetings are sparsely
attended and voting is done primarily by proxy. Under Regulation 14A promulgated
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, soliciting votes for a written
consent requires the Company to provide stockholders with the same information
they would receive if their votes were solicited for a meeting.

On the other hand, stockholders holding a majority of the issued and
outstanding shares of Common Stock may take action by written consent without
providing advance notice of such action to our remaining stockholders. In this
case, Regulation 14C promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires us to provide the stockholders who did not vote with an information
statement. The information statement provides information about the stockholders
who voted to pass the resolutions, as well as about the resolutions and their
effect on the Company and its stockholders. If action is taken by the majority
stockholders by written consent, the action may not take effect until 20 days
after the information statement is mailed to our stockholders.

Vote by Board of Directors

On September 7, 2005, our Board of Directors voted to amend the Company's
bylaws to permit its stockholders to take action by written consent pursuant to
Section 16-10a-704 of the Utah Revised Business Corporation Act.

Based on the foregoing discussion, the Board of Directors requests that
stockholders approve the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that, in accordance with Section 16-10a-1704 of the Utah Revised
Business Corporation Act, the stockholders of this corporation be permitted to
act by written consent in accordance with Section 16-10a-704 of the Utah Revised
Business Corporation Act.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE RIGHT OF
STOCKHOLDERS TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 16-10a-704 OF THE UTAH REVISED BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth, as of _______________, 2005, each
beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Common Stock.

Percent
Amount and Nature of of
Title of Class Name and Address Beneficial Ownership Class
- -------------- ---------------- -------------------- -----
Common Stock

The following table sets forth, as of _____________________, 2005,
information with respect to the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by (i)
each director nominee; (ii) each person (other than a person who is also a
director nominee) who is an executive officer; and (iii) all executive officers
and directors as a group. The term "executive officer" is defined as the
President/Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer,
any vice-president in charge of a principal business function (such as
administration or finance), or any other person who performs similar policy
making functions for the Company.

Percent
Amount and Nature of of
Title of Class Name and Address Beneficial Ownership(1)2) Class
- -------------- ---------------- ------------------------- -----

Common Stock Walter G. Mize,
Executive Officer and Director
2 North Caddo Street shares/Direct
Cleburne, Texas 76031 Ownership(3) %

Common Stock Harold L. Gilliam, Secretary, Treasurer,
Chief Financial Officer and Director
Gilliam, Wharram & Co.
107 Westmeadow Drive 298,100 shares/Direct
Cleburne, Texas 76033 Ownership(4) ______%

Common Stock Joe Martin, Director
Cleburne Eye Clinic
110 West Henderson 211,000 shares/Direct
Cleburne, Texas 76033 Ownership(5) *

Common Stock C. Dean Boyd, Director
1258 Clubhouse Drive 208,550 shares/Direct
Broomfield, Colorado 80020 Ownership(6) *

Common Stock Theresa D. Turner, Director
P. O. Box 1283 206,500 shares/Direct Winter Park,
Colorado 80482 Ownership(7) *

Common Stock Larry G. Coker
2 North Caddo Street 200,000 shares/Direct
Cleburne, Texas 76031 Ownership(8) *

Common Stock Thomas J. Pernice
2 North Caddo Street 206,000 shares/Direct
Cleburne, Texas 76031 Ownership(9) *

All Current
Directors and
Executive Officers
as a Group Shares _______%

* Less than 1%.
(1) Based on ________________ shares of Common Stock outstanding on the
transfer records as of _____________, 2005.
(2) Calculated pursuant to Rule 13d-3(d)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Under Rule 13d-3(d)(1), shares not outstanding which are subject to
options, warrants, rights or conversion privileges exercisable within 60
days are deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the number and
percentage owned by such person, but not deemed outstanding for the
purpose of calculating the percentage owned by each other person listed.
The Company believes that each individual or entity named has sole
investment and voting power with respect to shares of Common Stock
indicated as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property
laws, where applicable, except where otherwise noted.
(3) Includes 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock that may be issued upon exercise
of an option granted for 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock.
(4) Includes 200,000 shares of Common Stock that may be issued upon exercise
of an option granted for 200,000 shares of Common Stock. Also includes
30,500 shares of Common Stock and a warrant to purchase an additional
52,000 shares of Common Stock. The warrant was issued to Gilliam Wharram &
Co, PC, a professional corporation of which Mr. Gilliam is a principal.
The exercise price of the warrant is $0.50 as to 26,000 shares and $1.00
has to 26,000 shares. The warrant term is 10 years.
(5) Includes 200,000 shares of Common Stock that may be issued upon the
exercise of fully vested options.
(6) Includes 200,000 shares of Common Stock that may be issued upon the
exercise of fully vested options.
(7) Includes 200,000 shares of Common Stock that may be issued upon the
exercise of fully vested options.
(8) Includes 200,000 shares of Common Stock that may be issued upon the
exercise of fully vested options.
(9) Includes 200,000 shares of common stock that may be issued upon the
exercise of fully vested options.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

On May 24, 2005, each of the directors, with the exception of Walter G.
Mize and Harold L. Gilliam, were granted options to purchase 80,000 shares of
the Company's Common Stock at a price of $0.50 per share, the fair market value
on the date of grant. The term of each option is three years.

In April 2004 the Board of Directors granted an option to Thomas J.
Pernice, in exchange for his agreement to serve as a director. The option allows
Mr. Pernice to purchase 120,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at a price
of $0.97 per share. The option expires on April 20, 2009.

The Company does not have a standard or other arrangement pursuant to
which directors are compensated for services provided as a director.

IDENTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Walter G. Mize, President and Chief Executive Officer

See discussion of business experience above.

C. Dean Boyd, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

See discussion of business experience above.

Dr. Joe Martin, Assistant Secretary

See discussion of business experience above.

SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION

During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2003, March 31, 2004 and March 31,
2005, neither the Company nor its subsidiaries paid any cash compensation to the
Company's Chief Executive Officer, and no executive officer of the Company
received compensation in excess of $100,000. The Company has no employment
agreements with its executive officers.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

LONG TERM COMPENSATION
----------------------------------------------
ANNUAL COMPENSATION AWARDS PAYOUTS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other
Annual Securities All Other
Compen- Restricted Underlying LTIP Compen-
Name and Principal Salary Bonus sation Stock Awards Options/ Payouts sation
Position Year ($) ($) ($) ($) SARs(1) ($) ($)
- -------------------- ---- ------ ----- ------ ------------ ---------- ------- ----------

Chief Executive
Officer
Walter G. Mize 2005 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Director, CEO and 2004 (2)0 0 0 0 0 0 (2)
President 2003 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(1) No stock appreciation rights were granted in 2003, 2004 or 2005.

(2) On May 30, 2003, Mr. Mize was granted an option to purchase 1,000,000
shares of the Company's Common Stock at a price of $0.50 per share. The
option was fully vested on July 1, 2003. The option had no fair market
value at the time of grant.

OPTION GRANTS DURING THE 2005 FISCAL YEAR

Option/SAR Grants for Last
Fiscal Year-Individual Grants

Number of
Securities % of Total
Underlying Options/SARs Granted
Options/SARs to Employees in Exercise Price
Name Granted (#) Fiscal Year ($/sh) Expiration Date

Joe Martin 80,000 shares of 20% $0.50 May 24, 2008
Common Stock

C. Dean Boyd 80,000 shares of 20% $0.50 May 24, 2008
Common Stock

Theresa Turner 80,000 shares of 20% $0.50 May 24, 2008
Common Stock

Larry D. Coker 80,000 shares of 20% $0.50 May 24, 2008
Common Stock

Thomas J. Pernice 80,000 shares of 20% $0.50 May 24, 2008
Common Stock

No officers or directors exercised any stock options during the 2005
fiscal year.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Transactions With Management and Others

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 the Company received the use
of office space and equipment from Walter G. Mize without charge. The Company's
management estimates the value of the use of the office space and equipment at
approximately $25,000 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. Mr. Mize is
under no obligation to provide the use of the office space or equipment to the
Company.

The Company received a line of credit of up to $3.0 million from Almac
Financial Corporation, a corporation related to Walter G. Mize. The line of
credit is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and its
subsidiaries. We believe that this line of credit is on terms at least as
favorable to the Company as it could obtain from a lender not related to the
Company. During the 2004 fiscal year, the Company raised money from sales of its
securities. The Company used $500,000 from the offering proceeds to repay a
portion of the line of credit. On February 17, 2005, Almac Financial Corporation
agreed to increase the line of credit to $4 million, and on June 27, 2005, Almac
Financial Corporation agreed to loan us an additional $2.5 million, subject to
certain conditions.

MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors held two meetings during the 2005 fiscal year. In
addition, action was taken by the Board of Directors by unanimous written
consent nine times in lieu of a meeting. Each director attended all of the
meetings of the Board during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors has not established a formal process for
stockholders to send communications to its members. Any stockholder may send a
communication to any member of the Board of Directors, in care of the Company's
address, 2 North Caddo Street, Cleburne, Texas 76031. The Company will forward
any such communication to the Board member. If the stockholder would like the
communication to be confidential, it should be so marked.

ATTENDANCE OF BOARD MEMBERS AT ANNUAL STOCKHOLDERS' MEETING

Each of the members of the Board of Directors will be required to attend
the Annual Meeting. All members of the Board of Directors attended the previous
Annual Meeting of the Company's stockholders.

REPORT ON COMMITTEES

The Board of Directors has three standing committees. Information
regarding the functions of the Board's committees, their present membership and
the number of meetings held by each committee during the 2005 fiscal year is
described below.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is responsible for recommending to
the Board of Directors the selection of independent public accountants to audit
the Company's books and records annually, to discuss with the independent
auditors the scope and results of any audit, to review and approve any nonaudit
services performed by the Company's independent auditing firm, and to review
certain related party transactions. The Audit Committee acts pursuant to a
written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The members of the Audit
Committee are Mr. Thomas J. Pernice, Mr. Larry Coker and Ms. Theresa Turner. The
Audit Committee met four times in the year 2005. The members of the Audit
Committee are independent as that term is defined in section (a)15 of Rule 4200
of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules.

Stock Option Committee. The Stock Option Committee is responsible for the
administration of the 1995 United Heritage Corporation Stock Option Plan, the
1996 Stock Option Plan, the 1998 Stock Option Plan, the 2000 Stock Option Plan
and the 2002 Consultant Equity Plan. The members of the Stock Option Committee
are Mr. Thomas J. Pernice and Mr. Walter G. Mize. The Stock Option Committee did
not meet in the 2005 fiscal year; instead, option and other equity grants made
pursuant to the above-named plans were made by the Board of Directors.

Nominating Committee. The members of the Nominating Committee are Mr.
Walter G. Mize, Mr. Thomas J. Pernice, Ms. Theresa Turner and Mr. Larry G.
Coker. The Nominating Committee met once during the fiscal year ended March 31,
2005. Three of the four members of the Nominating Committee are independent, as
that term is defined in section (a)15 of Rule 4200 of the Nasdaq Marketplace
Rules. The Nominating Committee does not have a policy with regard to the
consideration of any director candidates recommended by stockholders. The Board
of Directors has made no determination as to whether or not such a policy should
be adopted. The Nominating Committee will consider candidates recommended by
stockholders. Any stockholder wishing to nominate a candidate to stand for
election should send the nominee's qualifications to the Nominating Committee in
accordance with the instructions set forth in the discussion included on page
_____ of this Proxy titled "Stockholder Proposals for the 2006 Annual Meeting".
The Company does not pay a fee to any third party to identify or evaluate or
assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees.

The minimum qualifications required by the Nominating Committee for a
director are:

o Minimum employment experience of 12 years;

o Minimum education of 12 years;

o The ability to commit at least 24 hours per year to the Company as a
member of its Board of Directors;

o A candidate for director may not:

(i) have any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any
business of which such person was a general partner or executive
officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years
prior to that time,

(ii) have been convicted in a criminal proceeding or be
subject to a pending criminal proceeding,

(iii) have been or be subject to any order, judgment, or
decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any
court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily
enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement
in any type of business, securities, futures, commodities or banking
activities,

(iv) have been found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in
a civil action), the Securities and Exchange Commission or the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or
state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been
reversed, suspended, or vacated; or

(v) hold a position on the Board of Directors of a business in
competition with the Company's business.

o A candidate for director must agree to abide by the Company's Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics.

The Nominating Committee believes that at least one or more of the
Company's directors should have experience in the oil and gas industry as well
as an understanding of the accounting principles applicable to the oil and gas
industry, generally accepted accounting principles and the preparation of
financial statements.

To date, the Nominating Committee has not received a nominee from a
stockholder who is not an officer or director of the Company. The Company's
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors,
Walter G. Mize, proposed the candidates for nomination to the Board of
Directors. Each nominee to the Company's Board of Directors expressed a
willingness to serve during the 2005 fiscal year and, based on a review of their
qualifications, were deemed to be suitable candidates for nomination.

The Board of Directors does not have a Compensation Committee.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is currently composed of
three directors who are independent directors as defined under Rule 4200(a)(14)
of the National Association of Securities Dealers Marketplace Rules. The Audit
Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors.

The Audit Committee oversees our financial reporting process on behalf of
the Board of Directors. Management is responsible for our financial statements
and the financial reporting process, including the system of internal controls.
The independent auditors are responsible for expressing an opinion on the
conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted
accounting principles. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit
Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and the independent
auditors the audited financial statements that have been included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2005.

The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the
matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61,
Communication with Audit Committees, as amended. In addition, the Audit
Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the auditors' independence
from the Company and its management including the matters in the written
disclosures provided to the Audit Committee as required by Independence
Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees.

The Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board
of Directors approved, the inclusion of the audited financial statements in the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the 2005 fiscal year for filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has also recommended the
selection of the Company's independent auditors for the fiscal year ending March
31, 2006.

Members of the Audit Committee

Thomas J. Pernice
Larry Coker
Theresa Turner

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT

Section 16(a) of the Securities Act requires our directors, executive
officers and persons who own more than 10% of our Common Stock to file reports
of ownership and changes in ownership of our Common Stock with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. Directors, executive officers and persons who own more
than 10% of our Common Stock are required by Securities and Exchange Commission
regulations to furnish to us copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

To our knowledge, based solely upon review of the copies of such reports
received or written representations from the reporting persons, we believe that
during our 2005 fiscal year our directors, executive officers and persons who
own more than 10% of our Common Stock complied with all Section 16(a) filing
requirements with the exception of Harold Gilliam, our director, who filed a
form 4 on July 1, 2004 reporting an acquisition of 52,000 shares of the
Company's Common Stock that occurred on June 15, 2004. The acquisition was made
in conjunction with an offering of convertible promissory notes made by the
Company. The principal balance of the promissory note was converted to our
Common Stock at the rate of $0.50 per share.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2006 ANNUAL MEETING

Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, any
stockholder who intends to present a proposal at the Annual Meeting in the year
2006 must deliver the proposal, including the name of a proposed nominee to the
Board of Directors, to our principal executive office no later than the close of
business on October 1, 2005.

Notice of intention to present a proposal at the 2006 Annual Meeting
should be addressed to Corporate Secretary, United Heritage Corporation, 2 North
Caddo Street, Cleburne, Texas 76031. We reserve the right to vote against,
reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any
proposal that does not comply with these requirements.

TRANSACTION OF OTHER BUSINESS

Management does not know of any matters to be brought before the meeting
other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement. If any matters which are
not specifically set forth in the form of proxy and this Proxy Statement
properly come before the meeting, the persons designated as proxies will vote
thereon in accordance with their best judgment.

PROXY

UNITED HERITAGE CORPORATION

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors
for the Annual Meeting on ____________, 2005

This proxy will be voted as specified by the stockholder. If no
specification is made, all shares will be voted "FOR" the approval of the seven
proposals set forth in the proxy statement.

The stockholder(s) represented herein appoint(s) Walter G. Mize and Joe
Martin, and each of them, proxies with the power of substitution to vote all
shares of Common Stock entitled to be voted by said stockholder(s) at the Annual
Meeting of the Stockholders of United Heritage Corporation to be held at the
executive offices, located at 2 North Caddo Street, Cleburne, Texas 76031, on
___________, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. (Central Time), and in any adjournment or
postponement thereof as specified in this proxy.

PROPOSAL #1-ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Walter G. Mize FOR |_| AGAINST |_| ABSTAIN |_|

Harold L. Gilliam FOR |_| AGAINST |_| ABSTAIN |_|

Joe Martin FOR |_| AGAINST |_| ABSTAIN |_|

C. Dean Boyd FOR |_| AGAINST |_| ABSTAIN |_|

Theresa D. Turner FOR |_| AGAINST |_| ABSTAIN |_|

Larry G. Coker FOR |_| AGAINST |_| ABSTAIN |_|

Thomas J. Pernice FOR |_| AGAINST |_| ABSTAIN |_|

PROPOSAL #2-RATIFICATION OF WEAVER AND TIDWELL, L.L.P. AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
FOR THE 2006 FISCAL YEAR.