UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

       Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): February 9, 2007

                            DETTO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

         Delaware                     333-100241                 01-656333
  ------------------------        ------------------         ------------------
(State or other jurisdiction   (Commission File Number)       (IRS Employer
 of incorporation)                                           Identification No.)



   14320 NE 21st Street, Bellevue, Washington                       98007
- ------------------------------------------------------------   -----------------
    (Address of principal executive
offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:        (425) 201-5000

                                 Not applicable
                             -----------------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)

Check  the  appropriate  box  below  if the  Form  8-K  filing  is  intended  to
simultaneously  satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the
following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

|_| Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)

|_| Soliciting  material  pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)

|_| Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange
Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

|_| Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange
Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

      This Form 8-K and other reports filed by Detto Technologies, Inc. ("Detto"
or the "Company") from time-to-time with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
(collectively, the "Filings") contain forward-looking statements and information
that are based upon  beliefs of, and  information  currently  available  to, the
Company's management, as well as estimates and assumptions made by the Company's
management.  When  used  in the  Filings,  the  words  "anticipate,"  "believe,"
"estimate,"  "expect," "future," "intend," "plan" or the negative of those terms
and  similar  expressions  as  they  relate  to the  Company  or  the  Company's
management  identify  forward-looking  statements.  Such statements  reflect the
current  view of the Company  with  respect to future  events and are subject to
risks,  uncertainties,  assumptions and other factors  relating to the Company's
industry,  operations and results of operations  and any businesses  that may be
acquired  by the  Company.  Should one or more of those  risks or  uncertainties
materialize,  or should  the  underlying  assumptions  prove  incorrect,  actual
results may differ  significantly from those anticipated,  believed,  estimated,
expected, intended or planned.



Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant.

      On February 9, 2007,  Williams & Webster,  P.S. (the "Former  Accountant")
was dismissed as the Company's  independent  auditor and independent  registered
public  accountant.  The Former  Accountant  audited the Company's  consolidated
balance  sheets as of December  31,  2005 and 2004 and the related  consolidated
statements  of  operations,  stockholders'  deficit and cash flows for the years
then ended. The report of the Former Accountant on the financial  statements for
those periods  contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and was not
modified as to uncertainty,  audit scope or accounting principles except that it
included an explanatory paragraph stating that the financial statements had been
prepared  assuming that the Company  would  continue as a going concern and that
there was  substantial  doubt about its ability to continue as a going  concern.
The  decision to dismiss the Former  Accountant  was  approved by the  Company's
Audit Committee.

      During the fiscal years ended  December 31, 2005 and 2004, and through the
date of this report,  the Former  Accountant did not advise the Company that (i)
internal  controls  necessary to develop reliable  financial  statements did not
exist, (ii) information had come to the attention of the Former Accountant which
made the Former Accountant unwilling to rely on management's  representations or
(iii) the scope of an audit should be expanded significantly.  However,  without
any  prior  consultation  with  the  Company,  on April  20,  2007,  the  Former
Accountant  delivered an undated  letter to the Company  stating that,  based on
information  from a former  member of the  Company's  Board of  Directors,  "the
financial  statements as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission are
misstated,  and  therefore  we are  withdrawing  our audit  reports for 2004 and
2005." Upon receipt of the letter,  the Company's  Chief  Financial  Officer and
others contacted the Former  Accountants in an attempt to determine the specific
reasons why it believed that the financial  statements  were  "misstated."  As a
result  of  those  contacts,  the  Company  determined  that the  source  of the
"misstatement"  was a 2004 transaction with Alista  Technologies,  Inc. in which
the Company  recognized  revenue of $1 million as a result of a payment of notes
payable  with an offset to a cancelled  receivable  under a licensing  agreement
(the "Alista Transaction").  Although the Former Account had previously reviewed
the accounting for the Alista Transaction without objection as part of its audit
reports for 2004 and 2005, it was now stating that because Alista  Technologies,
Inc. fell under the variable interest entity portion of FASB  Interpretation 46,
it should  have been  "consolidated"  with the  Company,  thus  eliminating  the
revenue (the "Revised Alista Accounting  Treatment").  In response to the Former
Accountant's  new position,  the Company  advised the Former  Accountant that it
disagreed with the Revised Alista  Accounting  Treatment and provided the Former
Accountant  with  information  indicating  that FASB  Interpretation  46 was not
applicable.  After providing that  information,  the Company attempted to engage
the Former  Accountant  in a discussion  as to the basis for the Revised  Alista
Accounting  Treatment;  however,  the Former  Accountant  failed to respond in a
meaningful manner and then advised the Company that it will no longer respond to
its communications. As a result, there has been no opportunity for the Company's
Board  of  Directors  or  any   committee   thereof  to  resolve  the  Company's
disagreement  as to the  Revised  Alista  Accounting  Treatment  with the Former
Accountant.

      The  Company  has  provided  the  Former  Accountant  with a  copy  of the
foregoing  disclosures  no later  than the date that this Form 8-K is filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "SEC") and has requested in writing
that the Former Accountant furnish it with a letter addressed to the SEC stating
whether or not it agrees with such  disclosures  (and,  if not,  the respects in
which it does not agree),  such letter to be provided  within ten business  days
after the filing of this Form 8-K. A copy of any such letter will be filed as an
exhibit to an amendment to this Form 8-K.

      Effective May 22, 2007, the Company engaged Peterson  Sullivan,  PLLC (the
"Successor  Accountant")  as its independent  auditor and independent  certified
public  accountant  for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. The decision to
engage the Successor  Accountant was approved by the Company's Audit  Committee.
The Company replaced the Former  Accountant for reasons unrelated to the Revised
Alista Accounting Treatment.  The Company has consulted the Successor Accountant
regarding whether the Revised Alista Accounting Treatment was correct. While the
Successer Accountant has not taken an audit-based position regarding the Revised
Alista Accounting  Treatment,  the Company believes that the original accounting
treatment  of  the  Alista  Transaction  was  correct  and  that  the  financial
statements  for the  fiscal  years  ended  December  31,  2005  and 2004 are not
"misstated" in that regard. If necessary,  the Company will authorize the Former
Accountant  to  respond  fully  to the  inquiries  of the  Successor  Accountant
concerning the Revised Alista Accounting Treatment.



      The  Company   provided  the  Successor   Accountant  with  the  foregoing
disclosures  prior to filing of this Form 8-K and requested that it review those
disclosures.  The  Company  has  provided  the  Successor  Accountant  with  the
opportunity to furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the SEC containing
any new  information,  clarifying  the  Company's  expression  of the  Successor
Accountant's views, or stating any respects in which it does not agree with such
disclosures  in this Form  8-K.  A copy of any such  letter  will be filed as an
exhibit to an amendment to this Form 8-K.


Item 4.02  Non-Reliance on Previously  Issued Financial  Statements or a Related
Audit Report or Completed Interim Review.

      In connection  with the  circumstances  described in Item 4.01 above,  the
Company's  Former  Accountant has advised it that  disclosure  should be made to
prevent  future  reliance on  previously  issued  audit  reports  related to the
financial  statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. See
Item 4.01 for  additional  information.  The  Company  has  provided  the Former
Accountant with a copy of the foregoing  disclosures no later than the date that
this Form 8-K is filed with the SEC and has requested in writing that the Former
Accountant furnish it as promptly as possible with a letter addressed to the SEC
stating  whether  or not it  agrees  with such  disclosures  (and,  if not,  the
respects in which it does not agree). A copy of any such letter will be filed as
an exhibit to an amendment to this Form 8-K.


Item 5.02  Departure of Directors or Certain  Officers;  Election of  Directors;
Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.

      Effective on May 3, 2007, Pablo Perez-Fernandez  resigned as the Company's
Co-Chief Executive Officer and as a director of the Company. Neither resignation
was the  result  of a  disagreement  with  the  Company.  As a  result  of those
resignations,  Larry  Mana'o  remains  as the  Company's  sole  Chief  Executive
Officer.

                                   SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                                    DETTO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Date: June 2, 2007                                  By: /s/ Larry Mana'o
                                                       -----------------
                                                       Larry Mana'o,
                                                       Chief Executive Officer