UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
AMENDMENT NO. 1
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ________ to ________
Commission file number: 0-10909
PHASE III MEDICAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 22-2343568
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
330 South Service Road
Suite 120
Melville, New York 11747
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (631) 574 4955
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.001
par value
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
[_] Yes [X] No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. [X] Yes [_] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K (ss. 229.405 of this Chapter) is not contained herein, and
will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive
proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. [X] Yes [ ] No
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates of the Registrant as of June 30, 2005 was approximately
$1,218,527 million. (For purposes of determining this amount, only directors,
executive officers, and 10% or greater stockholders have been deemed
affiliates).
On March 17, 2006, 78,571,087 shares of the Registrant's common stock, par value
$0.001 per share, were outstanding.
Documents incorporated by reference: None
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1 Business 4
Item 1A. Risk Factors 9
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 16
Item 2 Properties 16
Item 3 Legal Proceedings 16
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 16
PART II
Item 5 Market for the Registrant's Common Equity,
Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 17
Item 6 Selected Financial Data 28
Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations 28
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 32
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 33
Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure 33
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 33
Item 9B. Other Information 34
PART III
Item 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 35
Item 11 Executive Compensation 38
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters 45
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 46
Item 14 Principal Accounting Fees and Services 47
PART IV
Item 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 48
CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
- --------------------------------------------
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such
forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of
Phase III Medical, Inc. (the "Company"), or industry results, to be materially
different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. When used in this Annual Report,
statements that are not statements of current or historical fact may be deemed
to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words
"plan," "intend," "may," "will," "expect," "believe," "could," "anticipate,"
"estimate," or "continue" or similar expressions or other variations or
comparable terminology are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.
Additionally, statements concerning the Company's ability to develop the adult
stem cell business, the future of regenerative medicine and the role of adult
stem cells in that future, the future use of adult stem cells as a treatment
option and the potential revenue growth of such business are forward-looking
statements. The Company's ability to enter the adult stem cell arena and future
operating results are dependent upon many factors, including but not limited to
(i) the Company's ability to obtain sufficient capital or a strategic business
arrangement to fund its expansion plans; (ii) the Company's ability to build the
management and human resources and infrastructure necessary to support the
growth of its business; (iii) competitive factors and developments beyond the
Company's control; (iv) scientific and medical developments beyond the Company's
control; (v) any adverse effect or limitations caused by government regulation
of the business; and (vi) other risk factors discussed in "Business - Risk
Factors" contained herein. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Except
as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to update any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Phase III Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Phase III" or the "Company")
is currently engaged in the business of operating a commercial autologous (donor
and recipient are the same) adult stem cell bank and is pioneering the
pre-disease collection, processing and storage of adult stem cells that donors
can access for their own present and future medical treatment. The Company's
previous business had been providing capital and business guidance to companies
in the healthcare and life science industries. On January 19, 2006 the Company
consummated the acquisition of the assets of NeoStem Inc., a California
corporation ("NeoStem") relating to NeoStem's business of collecting and storing
adult stem cells. NeoStem had been a company to which Phase III had been
providing business guidance. Effective with the acquisition, the business of
NeoStem became the principal business of the Company. The Company now intends to
provide adult stem cell processing, collection and banking services with the
goal of making stem cell collection and storage widely available, so that the
general population will have the opportunity to store their own stem cells for
future healthcare needs. The Company also hopes to become the leading provider
of adult stem cells for therapeutic use in the burgeoning field of regenerative
medicine for potentially addressing heart disease, certain types of cancer and
other critical health problems. The Company will attempt to utilize the combined
Phase III and NeoStem management teams to develop and expand this business. A
marketing and operational plan is being developed to integrate both companies,
and a corporate awareness campaign is being prepared.
See "- Current Business Operations."
Until the NeoStem acquisition, the business of the Company was providing capital
and business guidance to companies in the healthcare and life science
industries, in return for a percentage of revenues, royalty fees, licensing fees
and other product sales of the target companies. Additionally, through June 30,
2002, the Company was a provider of extended warranties and service contracts
via the Internet at warrantysuperstore.com. The Company is still engaged in the
"run off" of such extended warranties and service contracts. For a discussion of
the Company's involvement in such other activities and Company history, see "-
Former Business Operations." In 2004, the Company launched its website:
WWW.PHASE3MED.COM. The Company's information as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission is available via a link on the website as well as at
www.sec.gov.
4
Current Business Operations
On January 19, 2006, the Company through a wholly-owned subsidiary consummated
its acquisition of the assets of NeoStem relating to NeoStem's business of
collecting and storing adult stem cells, pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement
dated December 6, 2005. The purchase price consisted of 5 million shares of the
Company's Common Stock, plus the assumption of certain enumerated liabilities of
NeoStem and liabilities under assumed contracts. The Company also entered into
employment agreements with NeoStem's chief executive officer and one of its
founders. NeoStem was incorporated in California in July 2002 and from its
inception through the acquisition by the Company, was engaged in the sale of
adult stem cell banking services. In October 2003 NeoStem leased laboratory
space in a research facility at Cedars Sinai Hospital in California and entered
into an agreement with a third party to provide adult stem cell collection
services. By December 2003 NeoStem had outfitted its laboratory with equipment
for processing, cryopreservation and storage of adult stem cells. In May 2004,
after a validation process and inspection and approval by the State of
California, NeoStem received a biologics license and commenced commercial
operations. In January 2005 NeoStem moved its adult stem cell processing and
storage facility to Good Samaritan Hospital. NeoStem was compelled to cease
operations because it did not have sufficient assets to complete the
revalidation of the new laboratory and NeoStem's biologics license was
suspended. In October, 2005 NeoStem restarted the validation of the laboratory
at Good Samaritan Hospital and now the Company is currently seeking a new
biologics license from the State of California. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase
Agreement, NeoStem is obligated to return to the Company (out of the 5 million
shares of Common Stock issued) 16,666 shares per day for each day after February
15, 2006 that such biologics license has not been issued. As of March 31, 2006,
733,304 shares of Common Stock are subject to recall.
The Company will attempt to develop NeoStem's business into a leader in the
adult stem cell field and to capitalize on the increasing importance the Company
believes adult stem cells will play in the future of regenerative medicine. The
use of adult stem cells as a treatment option for those who develop heart
disease, certain types of cancer and other critical health problems is a
burgeoning area of clinical research today. The adult stem cell industry is a
field independent of embryonic stem cell research. The Company believes that
adult stem cell therapies are more likely to be developed before embryonic stem
cell therapies due to significant governmental, legal, ethical and technical
issues. Medical researchers, scientists, medical institutions, physicians,
pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies are currently developing
therapies for the treatment of disease using adult stem cells. As these adult
stem cell therapies become licensed or become standard of care, patients will
need a service which can collect, process and bank their stem cells. The Company
intends to provide this service.
Stem Cells
Stem cells are very primitive cells that have the unique ability to transform
into many different cells, such as white blood cells, nerve cells or heart
muscle cells. When collected from adults, stem cells can be found in bone marrow
or peripheral blood. Certain processes can cause the stem cells to leave the
bone marrow and enter the blood where they can be collected. The Company only
works with adult peripheral blood stem cells.
Plan of Operations
The Company aims to become the leader in autologous adult stem cell banking by
developing a profitable service model which would create a source of stem cells
that potentially enables physicians to treat a variety of diseases. It is
expected that the Company's revenue model will initially consist of four
distinct revenue sources: collection fees and storage fees from subscribers;
fees derived from a partner collection program to open stem cell collection
centers; grants and fees for developing a first responder safety program for
certain government agencies, the military, regional and local agencies and fees
from diagnostic testing. It also plans to catalogue and store adult stem cells
in a biorepository - and as this biorepository grows, it is anticipated there
will be revenues derived from B2B relationships with pharmaceutical companies
and other stem cell companies developing stem cell therapies.
Source of Fees
o The fee structure for subscribers will be an upfront collection
fee and an annual storage fee.
o The Company plans to initially own and operate collection centers
in key metropolitan areas.
5
o The Company plans to partner with qualified operators to open
collection centers, in exchange for an upfront fee and ongoing
revenues for collection and storage.
o The Company intends to present a program to certain governmental
agencies and large cities for first responders to bank and store
their stem cells.
o As a longer term goal, the Company hopes to receive diagnostic
testing revenues based upon cell biomarker testing for predictive
cardiovascular events.
Marketing
The Company intends to embark on a significant marketing, advertising and sales
campaign for the purpose of educating physicians and potential clients to the
benefits of adult stem cell collection and storage. The essence of the Company's
strategy is to reach the end-customers as quickly as possible and to accelerate
the adoption curve of our service. In addition, the Company plans to utilize
marketing resources to develop and expand a stem cell collection partner
program.
Several consumer segments may recognize and experience the long-term benefits
from banking their own stem cells. These include:
o Individuals with a family history of serious diseases, i.e., diabetes,
heart disease, or cancer
o Wellness and regenerative medicine communities
o Families who have already banked the umbilical cord blood from their
newborns
o Patients diagnosed with cancer, cardiovascular disease, or diabetes.
The Company expects its marketing efforts to be designed to educate physicians
on the benefits both of referring their adult patients to the Company for stem
cell banking and participating in our partner collection program. Thus, it is
expected that revenue will be generated in three stages, targeting and/or
promoting the following:
Stage One
o Wellness Physicians to refer patients to the Company for collection
and banking the client's stem cells.
o Partner Program to expand the opening of collection centers and
increase the number of specimens being banked.
o Cardiology Market by selective use of clinical experience trials with
key interventional cardiologists throughout the United States.
o Stem Cell Therapies currently used by medical professionals and
hospitals or those who are developing new therapies.
o Patients at Risk for cancer, heart disease, etc, through medical
professionals, advertising, marketing and public service
announcements.
Stage Two
o Safety programs for first responders and expand relationships with
government agencies and initiatives by partnering with bio-defense
companies and certain government agencies.
o Diagnostic Testing program for a new biomarker for cardiac impairment.
Stage Three
o B2B Relationships relating to the use of the stem cell biorepository
with biotechnology, pharmaceutical and stem cell research companies.
The Company expects to hire an experienced medical service marketing executive
and a premier marketing and public relations company specializing in medical
service related businesses.
6
Intellectual Property
We are seeking patent protection for our proprietary technology. The Company
acquired two patent applications which had been submitted by NeoStem and are
pending, which are of material importance to our business. The first patent
addresses the process by which we prepare and store stem cells derived from
adult peripheral blood following mobilization of the stem cells from the bone
marrow. The second patent contains a number of claims relating to, among other
things, the use of stored stem cells to form the basis for medical information
that will provide statistics on the etiology of disease, and the use of stem
cells in the treatment of infectious diseases and breast cancer. The patent
position of biotechnology companies generally is highly uncertain and involves
complex legal, scientific and factual questions. Our success will depend, in
part, on whether we can obtain patents to protect our own technologies; obtain
licenses to use the technologies of third parties if necessary, which may be
protected by patents; protect our trade secrets and know-how; and operate
without infringing the intellectual property and proprietary rights of others.
There can be no assurance of our success in this regard.
Competition
For a description of matters relating to competition, please see "Item 1A - Risk
Factors - Risks Related to Competition."
Prior Relationship with NeoStem
On March 31, 2004, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement to assist
NeoStem in finding uses of and customers for NeoStem's services and technology.
The Company's initial efforts concentrated on developing programs utilizing
NeoStem's services and technology through government agencies. That agreement
was terminated as a result of the NeoStem acquisition. On September 9, 2005, the
Company signed a revenue sharing agreement with NeoStem pursuant to which the
Company had agreed to fund NeoStem certain amounts to pay pre-approved expenses
and other amounts based on a formula relating to the Company's ability to raise
capital. Once funded, NeoStem would pay the Company monthly based on the revenue
generated in the previous month with a minimum payment due each month. That
agreement was also terminated as a result of the NeoStem acquisition.
FORMER BUSINESS OPERATIONS
History
The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in
September 1980 under the name Fidelity Medical Services, Inc. On July 28, 1983
the Company changed its name to Fidelity Medical, Inc. From its inception
through March 1995, the Company was engaged in the development and sale of
medical imaging products through a wholly owned subsidiary. As a result of a
reverse merger on March 2, 1995 with Corniche Distribution Limited and its
subsidiaries, the Company was engaged in the retail sale and wholesale
distribution of stationery and related office products in the United Kingdom.
Effective March 25, 1995 the Company sold its medical imaging products
subsidiary. On September 28, 1995 the Company changed its name to Corniche Group
Incorporated. In February 1996, the Company's United Kingdom operations were
placed in receivership by creditors. Thereafter through March 1998 the Company
was inactive. On March 4, 1998, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase
Agreement with certain individuals (the "Initial Purchasers") whereby the
Initial Purchasers acquired in aggregate 765,000 shares of a newly created
Series B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock. Thereafter the Initial
Purchasers endeavored to establish for the Company new business operations in
the property and casualty specialty insurance and warranty/service contracts
markets. On September 30, 1998 the Company acquired all of the capital stock of
Stamford Insurance Company, Ltd. ("Stamford") and commenced operation of a
property and casualty insurance business. Stamford provided reinsurance coverage
for one domestic insurance company until the fourth quarter of 2000 when the
relationship with the carrier was terminated. On April 30, 2001 the Company sold
Stamford and was no longer involved in property and casualty specialty
insurance.
7
In January 2002, the Company entered into a Stock Contribution Exchange
Agreement, as amended (the "Exchange Agreement"), with StrandTek International,
Inc., a Delaware corporation ("StrandTek"), certain of StrandTek's principal
shareholders and certain non-shareholder loan holders of StrandTek (the
"StrandTek Transaction"). Certain condition to closing were not met, and the
Exchange Agreement was formally terminated by the Company and StrandTek in June
2002. In January 2002, the Company advanced to StrandTek a loan of $1,000,000 on
an unsecured basis, which was personally guaranteed by certain of the principal
shareholders of StrandTek and a further loan of $250,000 in February 2002 on an
unsecured basis. StrandTek defaulted on the payment of $1,250,000 plus accrued
interest due to the Company in July 2002. As a result, the Company commenced
legal proceedings againt StrandTek and the guarantors to recover the principal,
accrued interest and costs of recovery and in May 2003 was granted a final
judgment in the amount of $1,415,622 from each corporate defendant, in the
amount of $291,405 against each individual defendant and dismissing defendants'
counterclaims. The legal action concluded with the Company receiving payments
from the guarantors totaling approximately $987,000 in 2003.
WarrantySuperstore.com Internet Business
The Company's primary business focus through June 2002 was the sale of extended
warranties and service contracts over the Internet covering automotive, home,
office, personal electronics, home appliances, computers and garden equipment.
While the Company managed most functions relating to its extended warranty and
service contracts, it did not bear the economic risk to repair or replace
products nor did it administer the claims function, all of which obligations
rested with the Company's appointed insurance carriers. The Company was
responsible for marketing, recording sales, collecting payment and reporting
contract details and paying premiums to the insurance carriers. The Company
commenced operations initially by marketing its extended warranty products
directly to the consumer through its web site, and as a result of the
development of proprietary software by January 2001 had four distinct
distribution channels: (i) direct sales to consumers, (ii) co-branded
distribution, (iii) private label distribution and (iv) manufacturer/retailer
partnerships. During the first half of fiscal 2001, management became concerned
by the slow progress being made by its warrantysuperstore.com business and began
to evaluate other opportunities. In June 2002, management determined, in light
of continuing operating losses, to discontinue its warranty and service contract
business and to seek new business opportunities for the Company (see the
Strandtek Transaction, above, and Medical Biotech/Business, below). In addition
to such activities, the Company has continued to "run off" the sale of its
warranties and service contracts.
Medical/Biotech Business
On February 6, 2003, the Company appointed Mark Weinreb as a member of the Board
of Directors and as its President and Chief Executive Officer. Under his
direction, the Company entered a new line of business where it provided capital
and guidance to companies, in multiple sectors of the healthcare and life
science industries, in return for a percentage of revenues, royalty fees,
licensing fees and other product sales of the target companies. The Company
continued to recruit management, business development and technical personnel,
and developed its business model, in furtherance of its business plan. The
Company engaged in various capital raising activities to pursue this business,
raising $489,781 in 2003 and $1,289,375 in 2004 through the sale of Common Stock
and notes. Additionally, in 2003, it received a total of approximately $987,000
from the settlement with the StrandTek guarantors (a significant portion of
which was used to pay outstanding liabilities for legal expenses, employment
terminations, travel and entertainment expenses and consultants and the balance
of which was used for operating expenses and the retirement of certain debt). In
2005 and through March 2006, the Company raised $1,600,000. Such capital raising
activities since 2003 enabled the Company to pursue the arrangements with PSI
(below) and NeoStem.
On July 24, 2003, the Company changed its name to Phase III Medical, Inc., which
better described the Company's current business plan. In connection with the
change of name, the Company changed its trading symbol to "PHSM" from "CNGI".
8
On December 12, 2003, the Company signed a royalty agreement with Parallel
Solutions, Inc. "(PSI") to develop a new bioshielding platform technology for
the delivery of therapeutic proteins and small molecule drugs in order to extend
circulating half-life to improve bioavailability and dosing regimen, while
maintaining or improving pharmacologic activity. The agreement provided for PSI
to pay the Company a percentage of the revenue received from the sale of certain
specified products or licensing activity. The Company provided capital and
guidance to PSI to conduct a proof of concept study to improve an existing
therapeutic protein with the goal of validating the bioshielding technology for
further development and licensing the technology. The Company paid a total of
$720,000 since the inception of the agreement. The agreement also called for the
Company to pay on behalf of PSI $280,000 of certain expenses relating to testing
of the bioshielding concept, and since inception through December 31, 2005, the
Company paid $85,324 of such expenses. In August 2005, the Company received from
PSI a letter stating that the proof of concept study under the royalty agreement
had been completed and that despite interesting preliminary IN VITRO results,
the study did not meet the success standards set forth in the royalty agreement
and that PSI had no definitive plans to move forward with the program. Phase III
requested pursuant to the royalty agreement that additional in vitro studies be
performed with other molecules; however PSI was under no obligation to perform
any additional studies. If no additional studies were performed under the
royalty agreement the likelihood of PSI generating revenues in which the Company
would share would have been substantially reduced. At this time the Company does
not anticipate any further activity pursuant to the PSI Agreement.
In March 2003 and September, 2004, the Company entered into a revenue sharing
agreement and joint venture agreement, respectively, with NeoStem. As described
above, such agreements were terminated in connection with the NeoStem
acquisition.
On June 16, 2005, the Company signed a revenue sharing agreement with
Healthwave, a medical billing company that utilizes advanced, proprietary
technology and connectivity to improve the efficiency of paper-and
labor-intensive routines of healthcare transaction processing. Under the
agreement, Phase III was to fund Healthwave certain amounts and to provide
guidance to them principally relating to developing and marketing Healthwave's
healthcare transaction processing services. In return, Healthwave was to pay
Phase III on a monthly basis a portion of its gross revenues. Performance under
the agreement was contingent upon certain conditions, and has not been pursued
by either party.
Employees
As of March 15, 2006, the Company had seven employees.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
THE RISKS DESCRIBED BELOW ARE NOT THE ONLY RISKS FACING THE COMPANY. ADDITIONAL
RISKS THAT THE COMPANY DOES NOT YET KNOW OF OR THAT IT CURRENTLY THINKS ARE
IMMATERIAL MAY ALSO IMPAIR ITS BUSINESS OPERATIONS. IF ANY OF THE RISKS OCCUR,
ITS BUSINESS STRATEGY, FINANCIAL CONDITION OR OPERATING RESULTS COULD BE
ADVERSELY AFFECTED.
RISKS RELATED TO THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL CONDITION AND COMMON STOCK
We Have a History of Operating Losses and We Will Continue to Incur Losses.
Since its inception in 1980, the Company has generated only limited revenues
from sales and has incurred substantial net losses of $1,745,039, $1,748,372 and
$1,044,145 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Company expects to incur additional operating losses as well as negative
cash flow from its new business operations until, if ever, it successfully
commercializes the collection, processing and storage of adult stem cells.
9
We Have Liquidity Problems and Our Ability to Continue as a Going Concern Is
Questionable.
At December 31, 2005, the Company had a cash balance of $488,872, a working
capital deficiency of $1,245,084 and a stockholders' deficit of $1,817,638. The
Company's auditors, Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP, have expressed substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern based on its
lack of liquidity combined with its history of losses, and it will be more
difficult for the Company to raise capital on favorable terms as a result. The
financial statements of the Company do not reflect any adjustments relating to
the doubt of its ability to continue as a going concern. The Company has from
time to time raised capital for its activities through the sale of its equity
securities and promissory notes. Most recently, it raised $1,000,000 in gross
proceeds from a private sale of equity and convertible debt. The net proceeds
enabled the Company to complete the NeoStem acquisition, pay certain outstanding
liabilities and provide the Company with working capital to facilitate the
development of its new business, but the Company's financial condition still
raises substantial doubt about its ability to operate as a going concern.
Substantial additional financing is needed.
We Will Need Substantial Additional Financing and We Are Uncertain of Our Access
to Capital Funding.
The Company will require substantial capital to fund the Company's current
operating plan for its new business, including the payment of the assumed
liabilities of NeoStem and other outstanding liabilities. In addition, the
Company's cash requirements may vary materially from those now planned because
of expenses relating to marketing, advertising, sales, distribution, research
and development and regulatory affairs, as well as the costs of maintaining,
expanding and protecting our intellectual property portfolio, including
litigation costs and liabilities. The Company may seek additional funding
through public or private financings. Additional financing may not be available
on acceptable terms, or at all. If additional capital is raised through the sale
of equity, or securities convertible into equity, further dilution to then
existing stockholders will result. If additional capital is raised through the
incurrence of debt, business could be affected by the amount of leverage
incurred. For instance, such borrowings could subject the Company to covenants
restricting its business activities, paying interest would divert funds that
would otherwise be available to support commercialization and other important
activities, and holders of debt instruments would have rights and privileges
senior to those of equity investors. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate
financing on a timely basis, it may be required to delay, reduce the scope of or
eliminate some of its planned activities, any of which could have a material
adverse effect on the business. The Company is currently exploring
capital-raising opportunities, however there can be no assurance that it will be
successful or that sufficient capital will be raised.
We Will Continue to Experience Cash Outflows.
The Company continues to incur expenses, including the salary of its President
and executive officers, rent, legal and accounting fees, insurance and general
administrative expenses, and was in arrears for certain of these expenses as of
December 31, 2005. The Company's new business activities are in the development
stage and will therefore result in additional cash outflows in the coming
period. It is not possible at this time to state whether the Company will be
able to finance these cash outflows or when the Company will achieve a positive
cash position, if at all. Our ability to become profitable will depend on many
factors, including our ability to successfully commercialize the business. We
cannot assure you that we will ever become profitable. NeoStem itself had
nominal operations and nominal assets at the time of acquisition. From its
inception in 2002 through September 30, 2005, NeoStem had aggregate revenues of
$25,950, and aggregate losses of $2,357,940.
Stocks Traded on the OTC Bulletin Board Are Subject to Greater Market Risks
Than Those of Exchange-Traded and Nasdaq Stocks
10
The Company's Common Stock currently trades on the OTC Bulletin Board, an
electronic, screen-based trading system operated by the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. Securities traded on the OTC Bulletin Board are, for
the most part, thinly traded and generally are not subject to the level of
regulation imposed on securities listed or traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market or
on a national securities exchange. As a result, an investor may find it
difficult to dispose of our Common Stock or to obtain accurate quotations as to
its price.
Our Stock Price Could Be Volatile
The price of the Company's Common Stock has fluctuated in the past and may be
more volatile in the future. Factors such as the announcements of government
regulation, new products or services introduced by the Company or by the
competition, healthcare legislation, trends in the health insurance, litigation,
fluctuations in operating results and market conditions for healthcare stocks in
general could have a significant impact on the future price of the Company's
Common Stock. In addition, the stock market has from time to time experienced
extreme price and volume fluctuations that may be unrelated to the operating
performance of particular companies. The generally low volume of trading in the
Company's Common Stock makes it more vulnerable to rapid changes in price in
response to market conditions.
RISKS RELATING TO THE COMPANY'S NEW BUSINESS
If the Potential of Stem Cell Therapy to Treat Serious Diseases is Not Realized,
the Value of Our Stem Cell Collection, Processing and Storage and Our
Development Programs Could Be Significantly Reduced.
The potential of stem cell therapy to treat serious diseases is currently being
explored. Other than hematopoietic stem cell transplants, stem cell therapy is
not a commonly used procedure and it has not been proven in clinical trials that
stem cell therapy will be an effective treatment for diseases other than those
currently addressed by hematopoietic stem cell transplants. No stem cell
products have been successfully developed and commercialized to date, and none
has received regulatory approval in the United States or internationally. Stem
cell therapy may be susceptible to various risks, including undesirable and
unintended side effects, unintended immune system responses, inadequate
therapeutic efficacy or other characteristics that may prevent or limit their
approval or commercial use. If the potential of stem cell therapy to treat
serious diseases is not realized, the value of our stem cell collection,
processing and storage and our development programs could be significantly
reduced.
Because Our Industry is Subject to Rapid Technological and Therapeutic Changes,
Our Future Success Will Materially Depend on the Viability of the Use of Stem
Cells.
Our success materially depends on the development of therapeutic treatments and
cures for disease using stem cells. The broader medical and research environment
for such treatments and cures critically affects the utility of stem cells, the
services we offer to the public, and our future success. The use of stem cells
in the treatment of disease is subject to potentially revolutionary
technological, medical and therapeutic changes. Future technological and medical
developments could render the use of stem cells and our services and equipment
obsolete and unmarketable. As a result, there can be no assurance that our
services will provide competitive advantages over other technologies. If
technological or medical developments arise that materially alter the commercial
viability of our technology or services, we may be forced to incur significant
costs in replacing or modifying equipment in which we have already made a
substantial investment prior to the end of its anticipated useful life.
Alternatively, significant advances may be made in other treatment methods or in
disease prevention techniques which could significantly reduce or entirely
eliminate the need for the services we provide. The materialization of any of
these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
We May Be Forced to Undertake Lengthy and Costly Efforts to Build Market
Acceptance of Our Stem Cell Storage Services, the Success of Which is Critical
to Our Profitability. There Can Be No Assurance That These Services Will Gain
Market Acceptance.
11
We anticipate that service fees from the processing and storage of stem cells
will comprise a substantial majority of our revenue in the future and,
therefore, our future success depends on the successful and continued market
acceptance of this service. Broad use and acceptance of our service requires
marketing expenditures and education and awareness of consumers and medical
practitioners, and the time and expense required to educate and build awareness
of our services and its potential benefits could significantly delay market
acceptance and our ultimate profitability. The successful commercialization of
our services will also require that we satisfactorily address the needs of
medical practitioners in order to address potential resistance to
recommendations for our services and ultimately reach our potential consumers.
No assurances can be given that our business plan and marketing efforts will be
successful, that the Company will be able to commercialize its services, or that
there will be market acceptance of our services sufficient to generate any
material revenues for the Company.
Ethical and Other Concerns Surrounding the Use of Stem Cell Therapy May
Negatively Affect Regulatory Approval or Public Perception of Our Stem Cell
Banking Services, Thereby Reducing Demand for Our Services.
The use of embryonic stem cells for research and stem cell therapy has
been the subject of debate regarding related ethical, legal and social issues.
Although our business only utilizes adult stem cells and does not involve the
use of embryonic stem cells, the use of other types of human stem cells for
therapy could give rise to similar ethical, legal and social issues as those
associated with embryonic stem cells. The commercial success of our business
will depend in part on public acceptance of the use of stem cell therapy, in
general, for the prevention or treatment of human diseases. Public attitudes may
be influenced by claims that stem cell therapy is unsafe, and stem cell therapy
may not gain the acceptance of the public or the medical community. Adverse
events in the field of stem cell therapy that may occur in the future also may
result in greater governmental regulation of our business and potential
regulatory delays relating to the approval or licensing of any or all of the
processes and facilities involved in our stem cell banking services. In the
event that the use of stem cell therapy becomes the subject of adverse
commentary or publicity, our business could be adversely affected and the market
price for our common stock could be significantly harmed.
We Operate in a Regulated Environment, and Our Failure to Comply with Applicable
Regulations, Registrations and Approvals Would Materially and Adversely Affect
Our Business.
Historically, the FDA has not regulated banks that collect and store stem cells.
Recent changes, however, require establishments engaged in the recovery,
processing, storage, labeling, packaging or distribution of any Human Cells,
Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products (HCT/Ps) or the screening or
testing of a cell tissue donor to register with the FDA under the Public Health
Service Act as of January 2004. The FDA also adopted rules in May 2005 that
regulate current Good Tissues Practices (cGTP). The Company may be or become
subject to such registration requirements and regulations, and there can be no
assurance that the Company will be able, or will have the resources, to comply.
Future FDA regulations could also adversely impact or limit our ability to
market or perform our services. Additionally, the states in which the Company
initially plans to engage in processing and storage activities all currently
have licensing requirements with which the Company believes it will need to
comply. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain the
necessary licensing. Currently, the Company is seeking a new biologics license
from the State of California. This process was started by NeoStem in October,
2005 when it restarted the validation of its laboratory at Good Samaritan
Hospital. There can be no assurance that the Company will receive this license,
or a license from any state in which it plans to maintain a stem cell storage
facility. If the Company identifies other states with licensing requirements or
if other states adopt such requirements, the Company would also have to obtain
such licenses and/or comply with such requirements. We may be required to spend
substantial amounts to comply with any such regulations and licensing
requirements, as well as any future legislative and regulatory initiatives.
Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in, among
other things, injunctions, operating restrictions, and civil fines and criminal
prosecution. Delays or failure to obtain registrations or licensing would have a
material adverse effect on the marketing and sales of our services and impair
our ability to operate profitably in the future.
12
Our Failure to Comply with Laws Related to Hazardous Materials Could Materially
Harm Us.
We are subject to state and federal laws regulating the proper disposal of
biohazardous material. Although we believe we are in compliance with all such
applicable laws, a violation of such laws, or the future enactment of more
stringent laws or regulations, could subject us to liability, require us to
incur costs and/or otherwise have an adverse effect on us.
Side Effects of the Collection Process or a Failure in the Performance of Our
Cryopreservation Storage Facility or Systems Could Harm Our Business And
Reputation.
To the extent a customer experiences adverse side effects of the collection
process, or our cryopreservation storage service is disrupted, discontinued or
the performance is impaired, our business and operations could be adversely
affected. Any equipment failure that causes a material interruption or
discontinuance in our cryopreservation storage of stem cell specimens could
result in stored specimens being damaged and unable to be utilized. Adverse side
effects of the collection process or specimen damage (including loss in transit
to the Company), could result in litigation against us and reduced future
revenue to us, which in turn could be harmful to our reputation. Our insurance
may not adequately compensate us for any losses that may occur due to any such
adverse side effects or failures in our system or interruptions in our ability
to maintain proper, continued, cryopreservation storage services. Any claim of
adverse side effects or material disruption in our ability to maintain continued
uninterrupted storage systems could have a material adverse effect on our
business, operating results and financial condition. Our systems and operations
are vulnerable to damage or interruption from fire, flood, equipment failure,
break-ins, tornadoes and similar events for which we do not have redundant
systems or a formal disaster recovery plan and may not carry sufficient business
interruption insurance to compensate us for losses that may occur.
We Are Dependent on Existing Relationships with Third Parties to Conduct Our
Business.
The Company's process of collecting stem cells involves the injection of a
"mobilizing agent" which causes the stem cells to leave the bone marrow and
enter into the blood stream. The injection of this mobilizing agent is an
integral part of the Company's process. There is currently only one supplier of
this mobilizing agent, and we are currently dependent upon our relationship with
such supplier to maintain an adequate supply. Although the Company continues to
explore alternative methods of stem cell collection, there can be no assurance
that any such methods will prove to be successful. We are also using only one
outside "collection" service. Although the Company has the ability to perform
the collection services itself or through other third parties, any disruption in
the relationship with this collection service would cause a delay in the
delivery of our services. In order to commercialize our business, we will
continue to depend upon our relationship with such companies. In particular, in
the event that our supplier is unable or unwilling to continue to produce a
mobilizing agent for us (and on commercially reasonable terms), and we are
unable to identify alternative methods or find substitute suppliers on
commercially reasonable terms, we may not be able to successfully commercialize
our business.
Our Success Will Depend in Part on Establishing and Maintaining Effective
Strategic Partnerships and Collaborations.
A key aspect of our business strategy is to establish strategic relationships in
order to gain access to critical supplies, to expand or complement our
development or commercialization capabilities, or to reduce the cost of
developing or commercializing services on our own. We currently have strategic
relationships with two parties. While we are currently in discussions with
others to establish additional relationships and collaborations, there can be no
assurance that the Company will enter into such relationships or that the
arrangements will be on favorable terms. Even if we do enter into these
arrangements, we may not be able to maintain these relationships or establish
new ones in the future on acceptable terms. Furthermore, these arrangements may
require us to grant certain rights to third parties, including exclusive rights
or may have other terms that are burdensome to us. If any of our partners
terminate their relationship with us or fail to perform their obligations in a
timely manner, the development or commercialization of our services may be
substantially delayed.
13
We Depend upon Management, Scientific and Medical Personnel and We May Face
Difficulties in Managing the Growth of Our Business.
The Company's future performance and success are dependent upon the efforts and
abilities of our management, medical and scientific personnel. Furthermore, our
future growth will require hiring a significant number of qualified technical,
medical, scientific, commercial and administrative personnel. Accordingly,
recruiting and retaining such personnel in the future will be critical to our
success. If we are not able to continue to attract and retain, on acceptable
terms, the qualified personnel necessary for the continued development of our
business, we may not be able to sustain our operations or achieve our business
objectives. Our failure to manage growth effectively could limit our ability to
achieve our commercialization and other goals relating to, and we may fail in
developing, our new business.
RISKS RELATED TO COMPETITION
The Stem Cell Preservation Market Has and Continues to Become Increasingly
Competitive.
Stem cell preservation is becoming an increasingly competitive business. For
example, in the established market for cord blood stem cell banking, the growth
in the number of families banking their newborn's cord blood stem cells has been
accompanied by an increasing landscape of competitors. Our business, which has
been more recently developed, already faces competition from other operators of
stem cell preservation businesses and providers of stem cell storage services.
We understand that LifeStem, a subsidiary of CalbaTech, Inc., desires to be an
autologous adult stem cell collection and storage company and focuses on the
micro-collection of stem cells and the storage of two different types of stem
cells for autologous use. In addition, StemSource, a division of Cytori
Therapeutics and Bio-Matrix Scientific Group Inc. each have established a stem
cell banking service to process and store stem cells collected from adipose
tissue (fat tissue). This type of stem cell banking will require partnering with
cosmetic surgeons who perform liposuction procedures. In addition, the Company
believes the use of adult stem cells from adipose tissue will require extensive
clinical trials to prove the safety and efficacy of such cells and the enzymatic
process required to extract adult stem cells from fat. From a technology
perspective the ability to expand a small number of stem cells could present a
competitive alternative to stem cell banking. The ability to create a
therapeutic quantity of stem cells from a small number of cells is essential to
using embryonic stem cells and would be desirable to treat patients who can only
supply a small number of their own stem cells. There are many biotechnology
laboratories attempting to develop stem cell expansion technology, but to date,
stem cell expansion techniques are very inefficient and typically the target
cells stop dividing naturally, keeping the yield low. However, stem cell
expansion could also complement adult stem cell banking by allowing individuals
to extend the banking of an initial collection of cells for many applications.
In general, we may face competition from companies with far greater financial,
marketing, technical and research resources, name recognition, distribution
channels and market presence than the Company who are marketing or developing
new services that are similar to the services that are now being or may in the
future be developed by the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company
will be able to compete successfully. In the event that we are not able to
compete successfully with our current or potential competitors, it may be
difficult for us to grow our revenue and maintain our existing business without
incurring significant additional expenses to try and refine our technology,
services or approach to our business to better compete, and even then there
would be no guarantee of success.
We May Face Competition in the Future from Established Cord Blood Banks and Some
Hospitals.
In addition, future competition may come from several sources including cord
blood banks and some hospitals. Cord blood banks such as ViaCord (a division of
ViaCell International) or Cryo-Cell International may be drawn to the field
because their processing labs and storage facilities can be used for processing
adult stem cells from peripheral blood and their customer lists may provide them
with an easy access to the market. We estimate that there are 54 cord blood
banks in the United States, 29 of which are autologous (donor and recipient are
14
the same) and 25 of which are allogeneic (donor and recipient are not the same).
Hospitals that have transplant centers to serve cancer patients may elect to
enter some phases of new stem cell therapies. We estimate that there are 110
hospitals in the United States with stem cell transplant centers. All of these
competitors may have access to greater financial resources. In addition, other
established companies with greater access to financial resources may enter our
markets and compete with us. There can be no assurance that we will be able to
compete successfully.
RISKS RELATED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
There is Significant Uncertainty about the Validity and Permissible Scope of
Patents in the Biotechnological Industry. We May Not Be Able to Obtain Patent
Protection.
There can be no assurance that the patent applications to which we hold rights
will result in the issuance of patents, that any patents issued or licensed to
our company will not be challenged and held to be invalid or of a scope of
coverage that is different from what we believe the patent's scope to be, or
that our present or future patents related to these technologies will ultimately
provide adequate patent coverage for or protection of our present or future
technologies, products or processes. This could materially and adversely affect
the Company and result in our not being able to commercialize our new business.
We May Be Unable to Protect Our Intellectual Property from Infringement by Third
Parties and Third Parties May Claim That We Infringe on Their Intellectual
Property. This Can Result in Significant Expense to Us and Materially and
Adversely Affect Our Business.
We will rely upon patent protection, trade secrets, technical know-how and
continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive
position, and we typically require our employees, consultants and advisors to
execute confidentiality agreements in connection with their employment,
consulting or advisory relationships. There can be no assurance, however, that
these agreements will not be breached or that we will have adequate remedies for
any such breach.
Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property, third parties may
infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property or may develop intellectual
property competitive to ours. Our competitors may independently develop similar
technology, duplicate our processes, services or design around our intellectual
property rights. As a result, we may have to litigate to enforce and protect our
intellectual property rights to determine their scope, validity or
enforceability. Intellectual property litigation is expensive (particularly for
a company of our size), time-consuming, diverts the attention of management and
technical personnel and could result in substantial cost and uncertainty
regarding our future viability. The loss of intellectual property protection or
the inability to secure or enforce intellectual property protection would limit
our ability to develop and/or market our services in the future and would likely
have an adverse affect on the revenues generated by the sale or license of such
intellectual property. Furthermore, any public announcements related to such
litigation or regulatory proceedings could adversely affect the price of our
common stock.
We also may be subject to costly litigation in the event our technology
infringes upon another party's proprietary rights. Third parties may have, or
may eventually be issued, patents that would be infringed by our technology. Any
of these third parties could make a claim of infringement against us with
respect to our technology. We may also be subject to claims by third parties for
breach of copyright, trademark or license usage rights. An adverse determination
in any litigation of this type could require us to design around a third party's
patent, license alternative technology from another party or otherwise result in
limitations in our ability to use the intellectual property subject to such
claims. Litigation and patent interference proceedings could result in
substantial expense to us and significant diversion of efforts by our technical
and management personnel. An adverse determination in any such interference
proceedings or in patent litigation to which we may become a party could subject
us to significant liabilities to third parties or, as noted above, require us to
seek licenses from third parties. If required, the necessary licenses may not be
available on acceptable financial or other terms or at all. Adverse
determinations in a judicial or administrative proceeding or failure to obtain
necessary licenses could prevent us, in whole or in part, from commercializing
our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
15
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Since February 21, 2003, the Company has leased office space in Melville, New
York. The current lease provides for an annual rental of approximately $22,800
and expires March 31, 2007. This space will be sufficient for our needs until
the business plan of the Company has been successfully implemented. In January
2005, NeoStem began leasing space at Good Samaritan Hospital in Los Angeles,
California at an annual rental of approximately $26,000 for use as its stem cell
processing and storage facility. The lease expired on December 31, 2005, but we
continue to occupy the space on a month-to-month basis. This space will be
sufficient for the Company's needs in the short term and we are in the process
of negotiating a new lease for the facility with the landlord. If such
negotiations are unsuccessful, we believe that we will be able to find a
suitable alternative location. NeoStem also leased office space in Agoura Hills,
California on a month-to-month basis from Symbion Research International at a
monthly rental of $1,687, and we plan to continue this arrangement to fill our
need for office space in California.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is not aware of any material pending legal proceedings or claims
against the Company.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of the Company's stockholders during the
fourth quarter of 2005. On March 17, 2006, a Special Meeting of the stockholders
was held pursuant to which stockholders were asked to vote upon, and approved,
an amendment to the Certificate of Designations for the Series A $0.07
Convertible Preferred Stock to exchange all of the 681,171 shares of Series A
Preferred Stock and accrued dividends into 5,449,368 shares of Common Stock. See
Item 5(a), "Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters - Series A Preferred Stock."
16
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
ITEM 5(a). MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
MARKET INFORMATION. The Company's Common Stock has traded on the OTC
Bulletin Board under the symbol "PHSM" since July 24, 2003. Prior to
that date, the Company's Common Stock traded under the symbol "CNGI."
The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices of the
Company's Common Stock for each quarterly period within the two most
recent fiscal years, as reported by Nasdaq Trading and Market
Services. On March 1, 2006, the closing bid price for the Company's
Common Stock was $0.06. Information set forth in the table below
reflects inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down, or
commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
2005 HIGH LOW
First Quarter $ 0.07 $ 0.03
Second Quarter 0.05 0.02
Third Quarter 0.10 0.03
Fourth Quarter 0.09 0.03
2004 HIGH LOW
First Quarter $0.18 $ 0.13
Second Quarter 0.22 0.06
Third Quarter 0.10 0.07
Fourth Quarter 0.10 0.05
HOLDERS. As of March 1, 2006, there were approximately 1,524 holders
of record of the Company's Common Stock.
DIVIDENDS. Holders of Common Stock are entitled to dividends when, as,
and if declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally
available therefor. The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its
Common Stock and, for the foreseeable future, intends to retain future
earnings, if any, to finance the operations, development and expansion
of its business. Future dividend policy is subject to the discretion
of the Board of Directors.
17
SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK
On March 17, 2006, the stockholders of the Company voted to approve an amendment
to the Certificate of Incorporation which permits the Company to issue in
exchange for all 681,171 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding and its
obligation to pay $528,564 (or $.78 per share) in accrued dividends thereon, a
total of 5,449,368 shares of Common Stock (eight (8) shares of Common Stock per
share of Series A Preferred Stock). Pursuant thereto, all outstanding shares of
Series A Preferred Stock will be cancelled and converted into Common Stock. The
Certificate of Designation for the Company's Series A Preferred Stock had
provided that at any time after December 1, 1999 any holder of Series A
Preferred Stock could require the Company to redeem his shares of Series A
Preferred Stock (if there were funds with which the Company could legally do so)
at a price of $1.00 per share. Notwithstanding the foregoing redemption
provisions, if any dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock were past due, no
shares of Series A Preferred Stock could be redeemed by the Company unless all
outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock were simultaneously redeemed. The
holders of Series A Preferred Stock could convert their Series A Preferred Stock
into shares of Common Stock of the Company at a price of $5.20 per share. If the
preferred shareholders did not approve the exchange of their shares into Common
Stock, and if the Company were required to redeem any significant number of
shares of Series A Preferred Stock, the Company's financial condition could have
been materially adversely affected.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table gives information about the Company's Common Stock that may
be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under the Company's
2003 Equity Participation Plan as of December 31, 2005. This plan was the
Company's only equity compensation plan in existence as of December 31, 2005.
(C)
NUMBER OF SECURITIES
REMAINING AVAILABLE FOR
(A) (B) FUTURE ISSUANCE UNDER
NUMBER OF SECURITIES TO WEIGHTED-AVERAGE EQUITY COMPENSATION
BE ISSUED UPON EXERCISE EXERCIE PRICE OF PLAN (EXCLUDING
OF OUTSTANDING OPTIONS, OUTSTANDING OPTIONS, SECURITIES REFLECTED IN
PLAN CATEGORY WARRANTS AND RIGHTS WARRANTS AND RIGHTS COLUMN(A))
------------- ----------------------- -------------------- -----------------------
Equity Compensation Plans
Approved by
Shareholders............. 23,140,832 $0.08 26,859,168
Equity Compensation Plans
Not Approved by
Shareholders............. 0 0 0
TOTAL 23,140,832 $0.08 26,859,168
18
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
In September 2002, the Company sold to accredited investors pursuant to
Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), five 60-day promissory notes in the principal sum of $25,000
each, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $117,500, net of offering
costs. The notes bear interest at 15% per annum payable at maturity. The terms
of the notes include a default penalty pursuant to which if the notes are not
paid on the due date, the holder shall have the option to purchase 25,000 shares
of the Company's Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $125. If the
non payment continues for 30 days, then on the 30th day, and at the end of each
successive 30-day period until the note is paid in full, the holder has the
option to purchase an additional 25,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock for
an aggregate purchase price of $125. As of December 31, 2003 a total of
1,000,000 of such shares resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $5,000 were
exercised because the notes remained unpaid. As of December 31, 2004, options to
purchase an additional 1,875,000 shares of Common Stock at an aggregate purchase
price of $9,375 were exercised pursuant to the default penalty. As of December
31, 2004 all but two of these notes and related interest had been repaid and
there were no additional options to purchase Common Stock outstanding.
The two outstanding notes described above totaling $50,000, were sold to an
unrelated third party who agreed to cancel the two notes and replace them with a
new note which did not contain the default penalty. This new note also included
a previous note of $25,000 which was issued on August 26, 2003 in exchange for a
loan from a then consultant of the Company. On October 1, 2004 a new promissory
note in the amount $75,000 bearing interest at 8% per annum was executed. This
note, plus accrued interest, was due June 30, 2005 and extended to August 31,
2005. On November 30, 2005, this note was converted into 1,275,000 shares of
Common Stock (as described later in this section).
In February 2003, the Company issued a total of 100,000 shares of Common Stock
(with a value of $3,000) to three of its major creditors in consideration of the
deferral of $523,887 in liabilities, subsequently paid in 2003.
The offer and sale by the Company of the securities described in the two
immediately preceding paragraphs were made to accredited investors, without
general solicitation or advertising, and in reliance upon the exemption from
registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for transactions by
an issuer not involving a public offering.
On March 17, 2003, the Company commenced a private placement offering, pursuant
to Regulation D, to raise up to $250,000 in 6-month promissory notes in
increments of $5,000 bearing interest at 15% per annum. Only selected investors
which qualified as "accredited investors" as defined in Rule 501(a) under the
Securities Act were eligible to purchase these promissory notes. The Company
raised the full $250,000 through the sale of such promissory notes, resulting in
net proceeds to the Company of $225,000. The notes contained a default provision
which raised the interest rate to 20% if the notes were not paid when due. The
due date of these notes had been extended to August 31, 2005. As of December 31,
2005, $70,000 of the principal amount of these notes had been converted into
1,190,000 shares of Common Stock and $80,000 of the principal amount of these
notes remained outstanding bearing interest at 20% (of which $15,000 was paid in
January 2006). The due date has been extended to September 30, 2006.
On September 22, 2003, the Company commenced an equity private placement
pursuant to Regulation D to raise up to $4,000,000 through the sale of up to
40,000,000 shares of its Common Stock in increments of $5,000 or 50,000 shares
(the "2003 Private Placement"). Such shares were not registered and were subject
to restrictions on resale. Only selected investors which qualified as
"accredited investors" as defined in Rule 501(a) under the Securities Act were
eligible to purchase these shares. The 2003 Private Placement closed on December
31, 2003 upon the sale of 2,825,000 shares, resulting in net proceeds to the
Company of $214,781. The investment banker, Robert M. Cohen & Company, was
issued a five year warrant to purchase 282,500 shares of Common Stock at an
exercise price of $0.12 per share. The warrant contains piggyback registration
rights.. In January 2004, the Company amended the 2003 Private Placement and
sold additional shares of Common Stock thereunder, which closed on July 31,
2004. As of July 31, 2004, 12,132,913 shares of Common Stock had been sold with
net proceeds to the Company of $1,105,000. Of these shares, 7,282,913 shares
were purchased by Robert Aholt, Jr., the Company's then Chief Operating Officer,
for $650,000.
19
In March 2004, the Company sold a 30 day 20% note pursuant to Regulation D in
the amount of $50,000 to a director who qualifies as an accredited investor to
fund current operations. As of December 31, 2004, $25,000 had been repaid and as
of December 31, 2005 the remaining $25,000 had been repaid.
In March 2004, the Company issued 30,000 shares of Common Stock to two
noteholders who were accredited investors in payment of interest.
In July 2004, the Company sold a five month 20% note in the amount of $25,000
and two six month 20% notes totaling $80,000 to three accredited investors to
fund current operations. As of December 31, 2004 the $25,000 note had been
repaid together with accrued interest. The due date was extended to August 31,
2005 on the remaining two notes for $80,000, which were subsequently converted
into 1,360,000 shares of Common Stock (as later described in this section). All
interest has been paid.
In August 2004, the Company sold a 30 day 20% note in the amount of $30,000 and
a six month 20% note in the amount of $25,000 to two accredited investors to
fund current operations. As of December 31, 2004, $30,000 had been repaid. The
due date was extended to August 31, 2005 as to the remaining $25,000, which
subsequently converted into 425,000 shares of Common Stock (as later described
in this section). All interest payments have been made.
In August 2004, the Company sold a six month 20% $100,000 convertible note to
its then Chief Operating Officer, an accredited investor. This note at maturity
was to be converted into shares of the Company's Common Stock at 85% of the
average price as quoted on the NASD Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board for the five
days prior to the maturity date of the note. In February 2005, this note was
converted into 1,960,784 shares of common stock. All interest payments were made
on the note.
The offer and sale by the Company of the securities described in the four
immediately preceding paragraphs were made to accredited investors, without
general solicitation or advertising, and in reliance upon the exemption from
registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for transactions by
an issuer not involving a public offering.
In each of the months August 2004 to December 2004, the Company issued 37,500
shares (for a total of 187,500 shares) of Common Stock to Consulting for
Strategic Growth Ltd., the Company's investor relations firm for services.
In each of the months August 2004 to January 2005, the Company issued warrants
to purchase 25,000 shares of Common Stock (for a total of 150,000 shares) at
$0.05 per share to Consulting for Strategic Growth Ltd, the Company's investor
relations firm. Such warrants are each exercisable for three years from the date
of issue.
The offer and sale by the Company of the securities described in the two
immediately preceding paragraphs were made to accredited investors, without
general solicitation or advertising, and in reliance upon the exemption from
registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for transactions by
an issuer not involving a public offering.
In September 2004, 7,282,913 shares of common stock were purchased by Robert
Aholt, Jr., the then Chief Operating Officer of the Company and an accredited
investor, for an aggregate purchase price of $650,000.
In December 2004, to fund current operations, the Company sold a 60 day 8% note
in the amount of $35,000 to its President and Chief Executive Officer, a 180 day
15% note in the amount of $25,000 to a related party, a 180 day 20% note in the
20
amount of $15,000, of which $5,000 has been repaid and a 90 day 8% note in the
amount of $25,000 to a Director, all accredited investors, totaling $100,000.
The due dates of the notes were extended to August 31, 2005 except for the
$15,000 note which was extended to September 30, 2005. As of December 31, 2005,
$85,000 converted into 1,445,000 shares of Common Stock (as later described in
this section). The due date of the remaining $10,000 was extended to September
30, 2006 and was repaid in January 2006. All interest payments have been made.
On January 1, 2005, the Company issued to Robert J. Aholt, Jr., the Company's
then Chief Operating Officer, 477,679 shares of unregistered Common Stock in
partial payment of salary as per his Employment Agreement dated September 13,
2004. Pursuant to this agreement, in partial consideration for Mr. Aholt's
services thereunder, on January 1, 2005 and on the first day of each calendar
quarter thereafter during the term thereof, Mr. Aholt was entitled to such
number of shares of Common Stock, with a "Dollar Value" of $26,750, $27,625 and
$28,888 during the first, second and third years of the term, respectively, at a
"Per Share Price" equal to the average closing price of one share of Common
Stock on the Bulletin Board for the five (5) consecutive trading days
immediately preceding the date of grant of such shares. Mr. Aholt's Employment
Agreement was subsequently amended pursuant to which effective as of September
30, 2005 he was compensated solely in cash.
The offer and sale by the Company of the securities described in the three
immediately preceding paragraphs were made to accredited investors, without
general solicitation or advertising, and in reliance upon the exemption from
registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for transactions by
an issuer not involving a public offering.
On each of January and February 20, 2005, the Company issued 37,500 shares of
its Common Stock, for a total of 75,000 shares, as compensation to Consulting
for Strategic Growth Ltd, its public relations firm.
In January 2005, the Company sold a six month 20% note in the amount of $25,000
to an accredited investor to fund current operations. This note was subsequently
converted into 425,000 shares of Common Stock as described later in this
section. In February 2005, the Company sold a six month 20% note in the amount
of $10,000 to an accredited investor to fund current operations (for which the
due date was extended until September 30, 2005). This note was subsequently
converted into 170,000 shares of Common Stock as described later in this
section. All interest payments have been made.
On February 20, 2005, the Company issued 1,960,784 shares of its Common Stock
in exchange for the conversion of a promissory note held by its Chief Operating
Officer.
In March 2005, the Company sold a 30 day 8% note in the amount of $17,000 to its
President and Chief Executive Officer (for which the due date was extended until
August 31, 2005) and a one year 15% note in the amount of $20,000 (which was
subsequently converted into 340,000 shares of Common Stock as described later in
this section) to two accredited investors to fund current operations. All
interest payments on these notes were current. The due date on the note in the
amount of $17,000 was extended to September 30, 2006, and it was paid in full in
January 2006.
On April 1, 2005, the Company issued 800,898 shares of its Common Stock to Mr.
Aholt, the Company's then Chief Operating Officer, in partial payment of salary
as per Mr. Aholt's Employment Agreement.
The offer and sale by the Company of the securities described in the five
immediately preceding paragraphs were made to accredited investors, without
general solicitation or advertising, and in reliance upon the exemption from
registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for transactions by
an issuer not involving a public offering.
On April 20, 2005, the Company and Catherine M. Vaczy, the Company's Executive
Vice President and General Counsel, entered into a stock purchase agreement
pursuant to which the Company sold to Ms. Vaczy 1,666,666 shares of Common Stock
in exchange for $100,000. This agreement also gave her the right to purchase up
to an additional $200,000 of Common Stock at a per share price equal to 85% of
the average closing price of one share of Common Stock Bulletin Board for the
five (5) consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of Ms. Vaczy's
notice exercising the option; provided, that in no event would the price be less
than $.06.
21
In April, 2005, the Company sold a one year 15% note in the amount of $100,000
to its Executive Vice President and General Counsel. Ms. Vaczy had the option to
convert the Note into shares of Common Stock at any time up until the 90th day
after the date of the Note at a per share price equal to 85% of the average
closing price of one share of Common Stock on the Bulletin Board, provided, that
in no event would the price be less than $.06. Following the 90th day after the
date of the Note, Ms. Vaczy was obligated, at any time prior to the date of
maturity of the Note, to convert the Note into shares of Common Stock unless Ms.
Vaczy shall have provided to the Company a notice terminating her employment
with the Company pursuant to her employment agreement. Effective as of November
30, 2005, the Note was converted into 1,700,000 shares of Common Stock in the
exchange offer described later in this section.
The offer and sale by the Company of the securities described in the two
immediately preceding paragraphs were made in reliance upon the exemption from
registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, for transactions by
an issuer not involving a public offering. The offer and sale of such securities
were made without general solicitation or advertising and with representations
by the investors that they were "accredited investors," as such term is defined
in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act.
On May 4, 2005, the Company sold 100,000 shares of its Common Stock to an
unrelated third party at a price of $.06 per share resulting in net proceeds to
the Company of $6,000.
On May 19, 2005, the Company, and Joseph D. Zuckerman, a Director of the
Company, entered into a subscription agreement pursuant to which the Company
sold to Dr. Zuckerman 100,000 shares of unregistered Common Stock in exchange
for $6,000.
On May 26, 2005, the Company and Wayne A. Marasco, the Company's Senior
Scientific Advisor and a Director of the Company, entered into a subscription
agreement pursuant to which the Company sold to Dr. Marasco 250,000 shares of
unregistered Common Stock in exchange for $15,000.
The offer and sale by the Company of the securities described in the three
immediately preceding paragraphs were made in reliance upon the exemption from
registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, for transactions by
an issuer not involving a public offering. The offer and sale of such securities
were made without general solicitation or advertising and with representations
by the investors that they were "accredited investors," as such term is defined
in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act.
On June 8, 2005, the Company entered into a subscription agreement pursuant to
which the Company sold to an investor 416,666 shares of unregistered Common
Stock in exchange for $25,000.
On July 1, 2005, the Company issued 668,750 shares of unregistered Common Stock
to Mr. Aholt, the Company's then Chief Operating Officer, in partial payment of
salary based on the formula in his Employment Agreement.
On July 1, 2005, the Company issued to Consulting for Strategic Growth Ltd., its
investor relations and public relations consultant, 16,666 shares of
unregistered Common Stock pursuant to the terms of its consulting agreement in
partial consideration for services thereunder.
On July 18, 2005, the Company sold 1,250,000 shares of its Common Stock to
Catherine M. Vaczy, its Executive Vice President and General Counsel, at a per
share purchase price of $0.06 for aggregate consideration of $75,000. This
purchase was as a result of Ms. Vaczy's exercise of the option contained in her
April 20, 2005 stock purchase agreement.
22
The offer and sale by the Company of the securities described in the four
immediately preceding paragraphs were made in reliance upon the exemption from
registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, for transactions by
an issuer not involving a public offering. The offer and sale of such securities
were made without general solicitation or advertising and with representations
by the investors that they were "accredited investors," as such term is defined
in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act.
On each of August 1, 2005 and September 1, 2005, the Company issued to
Consulting for Strategic Growth Ltd, its investor relations and public relations
consultant, 16,666 shares of its unregistered Common Stock pursuant to the terms
of its consulting agreement in partial consideration for services thereunder.
On August 16, 2005, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with Wayne
A. Marasco, the Company's Senior Scientific Advisor and a Director of the
Company, pursuant to which the Company sold to Dr. Marasco 833,333 shares of
unregistered Common Stock in exchange for $50,000.
Pursuant to the terms of a letter agreement dated as of August 12, 2005 and
entered into between the Company and Catherine M. Vaczy, the Company's Executive
Vice President and General Counsel, on August 12, 2005 the Company issued to Ms.
Vaczy 412,339 shares of unregistered Common Stock in payment of $24,740 in
salary accrued during the period April 20, 2005 through August 12, 2005 at a per
share price of $.06, the closing price of one share of Common Stock on the
Bulletin Board on August 12, 2005. On October 3, 2005, the Company issued to Ms.
Vaczy pursuant to the letter agreement, 260,817 shares of unregistered Common
Stock in payment of $10,433 in salary accrued during the period August 15, 2005
through September 30, 2005 at a per share price of $.04, the closing price of
one share of Common Stock on the Bulletin Board on September 30, 2005.
In August 2005, the Company sold an 8% note in the amount of $10,000 to its
President and Chief Executive Officer, an accredited investor, which was due on
demand. The due date was extended to September 30, 2006, and the note was paid
in full in January 2006.
In September 2005, the Company sold two 8% notes in the amounts of $6,000 and
$15,000 to its President and Chief Executive Officer, an accredited investor,
which were due on demand. The due dates were extended to September 30, 2006, and
they were paid in full in January 2006.
On September 14, 2005, the Company issued to Dr. Robin Smith 500,000 shares of
the Company's unregistered Common Stock pursuant to the terms of a consulting
agreement with Dr. Smith pursuant to which she serves as the Chairman of the
Company's Advisory Board. Dr. Smith was also issued three year warrants to
purchase 240,000 shares of Common Stock at $0.08 per share. Such warrants vest
at the rate of 20,000 per month.
On September 29, 2005, the Company entered into a subscription agreement
pursuant to which the Company sold to an investor 142,857 shares of unregistered
Common Stock in exchange for $10,000.
Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Aholt's Employment Agreement dated September 13,
2004, as amended by a letter agreement dated July 20, 2005, on October 3, 2005,
the Company issued to Mr. Aholt, 461,206 shares of unregistered Common Stock in
payment of accrued salary. The shares issued had an aggregate dollar value of
$26,750, and the price per share was equal to the average closing price of one
share of Common Stock on the Bulletin Board for the five (5) consecutive trading
days immediately preceding the date of grant of such shares.
The offer and sale by the Company of the securities described in the eight
immediately preceding paragraphs were made in reliance upon the exemption from
registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, for transactions by
an issuer not involving a public offering. The offer and sale of such securities
were made without general solicitation or advertising and with representations
by the investors that they were "accredited investors," as such term is defined
in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act.
On each of October 1, 2005 and November 1, 2005, 16,666 shares of the Company's
Common Stock were issued to Consulting for Strategic Growth Ltd., the Company's
investor relations and public relations firm; as compensation for work to be
performed in October and November 2005.
23
On October 6, 2005, the Company sold 250,000 shares of its Common Stock to an
accredited investor at a price of $.04 per share resulting in gross proceeds to
the Company of $10,000.
On October 6, 2005, the Company sold 500,000 shares of its Common Stock to a
member of its Advisory Board, an accredited investor, at a price of $.05 per
share resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of $25,000.
On October 28, 2005, the Company issued 50,000 shares of Common Stock to a
hospital in exchange for advertising in an event journal. Such shares were
valued at $3,500.
On November 10, 2005, the Company sold a total of 833,332 shares of its Common
Stock to two accredited investors at a price of $.06 per share resulting in
gross proceeds to the Company of $50,000.
On November 28, 2005, the Company entered into a subscription agreement pursuant
to which the Company sold to an investor 6,250,000 shares of unregistered Common
Stock and short term warrants in exchange for $500,000.
The offer and sale by the Company of the securities described in the six
immediately preceding paragraphs were made in reliance upon the exemption from
registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, for transactions by
an issuer not involving a public offering. The offer and sale of such securities
were made without general solicitation or advertising and with representations
by the investors that they were "accredited investors," as such term is defined
in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act.
Effective as of November 30, 2005, the Company effected the exchange (the
"Exchange") of an aggregate of $445,000 in outstanding indebtedness of the
Company represented by certain promissory notes (the "Notes") for an aggregate
of 7,565,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company. The rate at which the Notes
were exchanged for shares of Common Stock was 17,000 shares of Common Stock for
every $1,000 of indebtedness represented by the Notes. Of the Notes, an
aggregate of $160,000 was held by certain officers and directors of the Company
and exchanged into 2,720,000 shares of Common Stock. The offer and sale by the
Company of the securities described above were made in reliance upon the
exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act
for exchange offers. The offer and sale of such securities were made without
general solicitation or advertising and no commissions were paid.
On November 20, 2005, the Company issued to an employee an aggregate of 60,000
shares of its restricted Common Stock in payment of an aggregate of $3,000 in
accrued salary.
On January 19, 2006, the Company effected the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of
unregistered Common Stock to NeoStem in connection with the purchase of the
NeoStem assets described in Item 1, Business. In addition, the Company issued an
aggregate of 2,012,225 shares of Common Stock to various parties in satisfaction
of $82,000 of $465,000 in assumed liabilities of NeoStem in connection with the
acquisition, of which 675,227 shares were issued to Denis Rodgerson
(subsequently the Company's Director of Stem Cell Science) and 96,148 shares
were issued to Larry A. May (subsequently the Company's Chief Financial
Officer).
On December 1, 2005, the Company issued to its investor relations consultant
16,666 shares of unregistered Common Stock pursuant to the terms of its
consulting agreement in partial consideration for services thereunder.
On December 22, 2005, the Company issued to its Executive Vice President and
General Counsel an aggregate of 416,666 shares of its restricted Common Stock in
payment of an aggregate of $25,000 in accrued salary.
The offer and sale by the Company of the securities described in the four
immediately preceding paragraphs were made in reliance upon the exemption from
registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, for transactions by
an issuer not involving a public offering. The offer and sale of such securities
were made without general solicitation or advertising and with representations
by the investors that they were "accredited investors," as such term is defined
in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act.
24
On December 30, 2005, the Company effected the exchange of $20,000 in
outstanding indebtedness of the Company represented by a promissory note, for
340,000 shares of its Common Stock.
Effective as of each of January 10, 2006 and January 11, 2006, respectively, the
Company effected the exchange (the "Exchange") of an aggregate of $45,000 in
outstanding indebtedness of the Company represented by certain promissory notes
(the "Notes") for an aggregate of 765,000 shares of restricted Common Stock of
the Company. The rate at which the Notes were exchanged for shares of Common
Stock was 17,000 shares of Common Stock for every $1,000 of indebtedness
represented by the Notes.
The offer and sale by the Company of the securities described in the two
immediately preceding paragraphs were made in reliance upon the exemption from
registration provided by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act for exchange
offers. The offer and sale of such securities were made without general
solicitation or advertising and no commissions were paid.
On December 30, 2005, and in January 2006, the Company entered into Subscription
Agreements (the "Agreement") with certain accredited investors and consummated
the sale of Units consisting of Convertible Promissory Notes and detachable
warrants under Regulation D under the Securities Act. Gross proceeds raised were
$250,000 on December 30, 2005 and $250,000 in January 2006, totaling an
aggregate of $500,000 in gross proceeds. Each Unit was comprised of: (a) a nine
month note in the principal amount of $25,000 bearing 9% simple interest,
payable semi-annually, with the 2nd payment paid upon maturity, convertible into
shares of the Company's Common Stock at a conversion price of $.06 per share;
and (b) 416,666 detachable three year Warrants, each for the purchase of one
share of Common Stock at an exercise price of $.12 per share. The Notes are
subject to mandatory conversion by the Company if the closing price of the
Common Stock has been at least $.18 for a period of at least 10 consecutive
trading days prior to the date on which notice of conversion is sent by the
Company to the holders of the Promissory Notes, and if the underlying shares are
then registered for resale with the SEC. Holders of the Units are entitled to
certain registration rights. The Company will, promptly following the last
closing date, endeavor to file a Registration Statement with the SEC to include
the shares of Common Stock underlying the Promissory Notes, the shares of Common
Stock underlying the Warrants, the shares of Common Stock issued to the
Placement Agent as its fee and the shares of Common Stock underlying the
warrants issued to the Placement Agent in payment of its fee. In the event that
the Registration Statement is not declared effective by the SEC as of the
six-month anniversary of the last closing date, the conversion price of the
Promissory Notes and the exercise price of the Warrants shall be decreased by
five percent for each 30-day period that the Registration Statement is not
declared effective by the SEC; provided, however, that in no event shall the
conversion price of the Promissory Notes and the exercise price of the Warrants
be decreased pursuant to the operation of this provision to an amount that is
less than $.04 and $.10 respectively.
The Company issued to WestPark Capital, Inc., the placement agent for the Units
described above, (i) 500,000 shares of Common Stock (250,000 shares on December
30, 2005 and 250,000 shares in January 2006); and (ii) warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 833,332 shares of the Company's Common Stock (416,666 on December
30, 2005 and 416,666 in January 2006).
None of the shares of Common Stock, short term warrants, Units and the
convertible promissory notes and detachable warrant comprising the Units were
registered under the Securities Act, and such securities were exempt from
registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506 of
Regulation D promulgated thereunder.
In March 2006, the Company issued warrants to purchase 120,000 shares of Common
Stock at a price of $0.10 per share to its marketing consultant. These warrant
vest 20,000 per month for six months. The warrants expire three years from date
of issue. These securities were issued to an accredited investor, without
general solicitation or advertising, and in reliance upon the exemption provided
by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for transactions by an issuer not
involving a public offering.
On March 17, 2006, the stockholders of the Company voted to approve an amendment
to the Certificate of Incorporation which permit the Company to issue in
exchange for all 681,171 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding and its
obligation to pay $528,564 (or $.78 per share) in accrued dividends thereon, a
25
total of 5,449,368 shares of Common Stock (eight shares of Common Stock per
share of Series A Preferred Stock). Pursuant thereto, all outstanding shares of
Series A Common Stock will be cancelled and converted into 5,449,368 shares of
Common Stock. The offer and sale by the Company of the securities described will
be made in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section
3(a)(9) of the Securities Act for exchange offers.
26
On March 27, 2006, the Company sold 100,000 shares of its Common Stock to an
Advisory Board member at a price of $.053 per share resulting in net proceeds to
the Company of $5,300. These securities were issued to an accredited investor,
without general solicitation or advertising, and in reliance upon the exemption
provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for transactions by an issuer not
involving a public offering.
ITEM 5(b) USE OF PROCEEDS
Not applicable.
ITEM 5(c) REPURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
There were no repurchases of equity securities by the Company or any affiliated
purchaser during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
as to which information is required to be furnished.
27
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected statements of operations and balance sheet data set forth below are
derived from audited financial statements of the Company. The information set
forth below should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited financial
statements and notes thereto. See Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data" and Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operation". The requirement to provide geographical information
for the operations of the Company is not practical.
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS: YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
($'000 EXCEPT NET LOSS PER SHARE WHICH IS DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
STATED IN $) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
Earned revenues $ 35 $49 $ 65 $ 81 $ 107
Direct costs 25 34 44 60 70
Gross profit 10 15 21 21 37
Operating (loss) (1,601) (1,474) (894) (1,149) (1,606)
Loss before discontinued operations and
preferred dividends (1,745) (1,748) (1,044) (1,160) (1,792)
Net loss attributable to common
stockholders (1,745) (1,748) (1,068) (1,208) (2,081)
Basic and diluted earnings per share:
Loss from continuing operations (.04) (.05) (0.05) (0.05) (0.08)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations - - - - (0.01)
Net loss attributable to common
shareholders (.04) (.05) (0.05) (0.05) (0.09)
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding 49,775,746 32,541,845 23,509,343 22,344,769 22,284,417
BALANCE SHEET DATA: AS OF AS OF AS OF AS OF AS OF
$'000 DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
Working Capital (Deficiency) $ (1,245) $(1,239) $ (794) $ (82) $ 1,085
Total Assets 643 99 312 1,183 1,836
Current Liabilities 1,752 1,288 1,023 1,141 489
Long Term Debt - - - 9 32
(Accumulated Deficit) (14,255) (12,510) (10,762) (9,694) (8,486)
Total Stockholders' (Deficit)/ Equity (1,818) (1,932) (1,503) (824) 373
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATION
28
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited
financial statements and notes thereto, included in Item 8 of this report, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference thereto.
GENERAL
The Company is currently engaged in the business of operating a commercial
autologous (donor and recipient are the same) adult stem cell bank and is
pioneering the pre-disease collection, processing and storage of adult stem
cells that donors can access for their own present and future medical treatment.
On January 19, 2006 the Company consummated the acquisition of the assets of
NeoStem Inc. ("NeoStem") relating to NeoStem's business of collecting and
storing adult stem cells. Effective with the acquisition, the business of
NeoStem became the principal business of the Company, rather than its historic
business of providing capital and business guidance to companies in the
healthcare and life science industries. The Company now intends to provide adult
stem cell processing, collection and banking services with the goal of making
stem cell collection and storage widely available, so that the general
population will have the opportunity to store their own stem cells for future
healthcare needs. The Company also hopes to become the leading provider of adult
stem cells for therapeutic use in the burgeoning field of regenerative medicine
for heart disease, types of cancer and other critical health problems.
Until the NeoStem acquisition, the business of the Company was providing capital
and business guidance to companies in the healthcare and life science
industries, in return for a percentage of revenues, royalty fees, licensing fees
and other product sales of the target companies. Additionally, through June 30,
2002, the Company was a provider of extended warranties and service contracts
via the Internet at warrantysuperstore.com. The Company is still engaged in the
"run off" of such extended warranties and service contracts. In June 2002
management determined, in light of continuing operating losses, to discontinue
its warranty and service contract business and to seek new business
opportunities for the Company. As a result, on January 7, 2002 the Company
entered into the StrandTek Transaction as previously reported. Consummation of
the StrandTek Transaction was conditioned upon certain closing conditions, and
the arrangement was formally terminated by written agreement between the Company
and StrandTek in June 2002. The Company had loaned a total of $1,250,000 to
StrandTek (which defaulted) and in 2003, the Company received a total of
approximately $987,000 from a settlement with StrandTek guarantors.
Management had been exploring new business opportunities for the Company and on
February 6, 2003, the Company appointed Mark Weinreb as a member of the Board of
Directors and as its President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Weinreb was
appointed to finalize and execute the Company's new business plan. Under his
direction, the Company entered a new line of business where it provided capital
and guidance to companies, in multiple sectors of the healthcare and life
science industries, in return for a percentage of revenues, royalty fees,
licensing fees and other product sales of the target companies. The Company
continued to recruit management, business development and technical personnel,
and develop its business model, in furtherance of its business plan.
On December 12, 2003, the Company signed a royalty agreement with Parallel
Solutions, Inc. ("PSI") to develop a new bioshielding platform technology for
the delivery of therapeutic proteins and small molecule drugs in order to extend
circulating half-life to improve bioavailability and dosing regimen, while
maintaining or improving pharmacologic activity. The agreement provided for PSI
to pay the Company a percentage of the revenue received for the sale of certain
specified products or licensing activity. The Company provided capital and
guidance to PSI to conduct a Proof of Concept Study relating thereto. As a
result of the Proof of Concept Study, PSI advised the Company that it had no
definitive plans to move forward with the program. Since the inception of the
PSI agreement, the Company paid a total of $720,000 to PSI and paid $85,324 of
expenses. The Company does not anticipate any further activity pursuant to the
PSI agreement.
The Company engaged in various capital raising activities to pursue its new
business opportunities, raising $489,781 in 2003, $1,289,375 in 2004, and a
total of $1,600,000 in 2005 through March 2006. Such capital raising activities
enabled the Company to pursue the arrangement with PSI and NeoStem. It will be
necessary for the Company to raise new capital. There can be no assurance that
the Company's new business will be successful or that the Company will be able
to raise new capital.
29
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
REVENUE RECOGNITION: Stamford's reinsurance premiums are recognized on a pro
rata basis over the policy term. The deferred policy acquisition costs are the
net cost of acquiring new and renewal insurance contracts. These costs are
charged to expense in proportion to net premium revenue recognized. The
provisions for losses and loss-adjustment expenses include an amount determined
from loss reports on individual cases and an amount based on past experience for
losses incurred but not reported. Such liabilities are necessarily based on
estimates, and while management believes that the amount is adequate, the
ultimate liability may be in excess of or less than the amounts provided. The
methods for making such estimates and for establishing the resulting liability
are continually reviewed, and any adjustments are reflected in earnings
currently.
INCOME TAXES AND VALUATION RESERVES: We are required to estimate our income
taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate as part of preparing our
financial statements. This involves estimating the actual current tax in
addition to assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatments
for tax and financial accounting purposes. These differences, together with net
operating loss carryforwards and tax credits, are recorded as deferred tax
assets or liabilities on our balance sheet. A judgment must then be made of the
likelihood that any deferred tax assets will be realized from future taxable
income. A valuation allowance may be required to reduce deferred tax assets to
the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In the event we
determine that we may not be able to realize all or part of our deferred tax
asset in the future, or that new estimates indicate that a previously recorded
valuation allowance is no longer required, an adjustment to the deferred tax
asset is charged or credited to net income in the period of such determination.
RESULTS OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS
The Company's "Critical Accounting Policies" are described in Note 2 to the
audited financial statements and notes thereto, included in Item 8 of this
report. The Company recognizes revenue from its warranty service contracts
ratably over the length of the contracts executed. Additionally, the Company
purchased insurance to fully cover any losses under the service contracts from a
domestic carrier. The insurance premium expense and other costs related to the
sale are amortized ratably over the life of the contracts.
FISCAL 2005 COMPARED TO FISCAL 2004
The Company generated recognized revenues from the sale of extended warranties
and service contracts via the Internet of $35,000 in fiscal 2005 compared to
$49,000 in fiscal 2004. The revenues generated in the year were derived entirely
from revenues deferred over the life of the contracts sold in prior years.
Similarly, direct costs incurred were $25,000 and $34,000 for fiscal years 2005
and 2004 respectively, which relate to costs previously deferred over the life
of such contracts.
General and administrative expenses totaled $1,611,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2005 as compared to $764,000 for fiscal 2004, an increase of
$847,000 or 190%. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in
salaries and related expenses ($495,000), consultants ($50,000), legal and
accounting ($196,000), investment banking fees ($61,000) and investor relations
($19,000).
In accordance with the PSI agreement, the Company paid PSI $0 in fiscal 2005 as
compared to $725,000 in fiscal 2004.
Interest expense decreased in fiscal 2005 to $144,000 from $274,000 in fiscal
2004 due to the lower level of debt and certain loans from officers and
directors at an interest rate of 8% compared with much higher rates from
non-affiliated noteholders in the previous year.
For the reasons cited above, the net loss decreased to $1,745,000 in fiscal 2005
from the comparable loss of $1,748,000 for fiscal 2004.
30
FISCAL 2004 COMPARED TO FISCAL 2003
The Company generated recognized revenues from the sale of extended warranties
and service contracts via the Internet of $49,000 in fiscal 2004 compared to
$65,000 in fiscal 2003. The revenues generated in the year were derived entirely
from revenues deferred over the life of the contracts sold in prior years.
Similarly, direct costs incurred were $34,000 and $44,000 for fiscal years 2004
and 2003 respectively, which relate to costs previously deferred over the life
of such contracts.
General and administrative expenses totaled $764,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2004 as compared to $685,000 for fiscal 2003, an increase of
$79,000 or 11.5%. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in
salaries and related expenses ($189,000), directors and officer's liability
insurance ($31,000), rent ($12,000) and investor relations ($29,000) partially
offset by decreases in legal ($59,000), consultants ($63,000), director's fees
($13,000) travel and entertainment ($17,000), stockholder's meetings ($12,000),
transfer agent fees ($5,000) and miscellaneous items ($13,000).
In accordance with the PSI agreement, the Company paid PSI $725,324 in fiscal
2004 as compared to $80,000 in fiscal 2003.
Interest income decreased from $89,000 in fiscal 2003 to less than $1,000 in
fiscal 2004 due to the lack of funds. Interest expense increased in fiscal 2004
to $274,000 from $215,000 in fiscal 2003 due to the higher level of debt and
certain debt being in default and therefore subject to a higher interest rate.
In addition, the Company recorded interest expense in fiscal 2004 relating to
the Series A Preferred in the amount of approximately $48,000 as compared to
approximately $24,000 in 2003 due to a recent accounting pronouncement.
For the reasons cited above, the net loss before preferred stock dividend
increased to $1,748,000 in fiscal 2004 from the comparable loss of $1,044,000
for fiscal 2003.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The following chart represents the net funds provided by or used in operating,
financing and investment activities for each period as indicated:
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
-------------------
December 31, 2005 December 31, 2004
Cash used in
operating activities $ (833,996) $(1,459,653)
Cash used in
investing activities $ 0 (3,288)
Cash provided by
financing activities $1,295,000 1,279,862
At December 31, 2005, the Company had a cash balance of $488,872, deficit
working capital of $1,245,084 and a stockholders' deficit of $1,817,638. In
addition, the Company sustained losses of $1,745,039, $1,748,372 and $1,044,145
for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Company's lack of liquidity combined with its history of losses raises
substantial doubt as to the ability of the Company to continue as a going
concern. No assurance can be given as to the Company's ability to raise
additional financing to cure its liquidity issues.
On December 30, 2005 the Company commenced a private placement to sell 9% six
month convertible notes in $25,000 units. Each unit consisted of the 9% note
convertible into shares of the Company's Common Stock at $0.06 per share and
416,666 warrants to purchase the Company's Common Stock at an exercise price of
$.12 per share. On December 30, 2005, the Company sold $250,000 of these notes
and through January 31, 2006 an additional $250,000 of these notes for a total
of $500,000. The net proceeds from the sales of these notes to the Company were
$443,880.
31
The following table reflects a summary of the Company's contractual cash
obligations as of December 31, 2005:
PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS LESS THAN 1 MORE THAN 5
TOTAL YEAR 1-3 YEARS 3-5 YEARS YEARS
Notes payable $ 433,000 $ 433,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Operating leases 74,744 69,044 5,700 0 0
Employment agreements 2,332,867 986,083 1,346,783 0 0
-
SERIES A MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE
PREFERRED STOCK 572,208 47,684 143,052 143,052 238,420
------- ------ ------- ------- -------
Total $2,840,611 $1,535,811 $1,495,535 $143,052 $238,420
--------- --------- ---------- -------- --------
The table above includes the contractual obligations acquired in the purchase of
substantially all the assets of NeoStem, Inc. on January 19, 2006.
INFLATION
The Company does not believe that its operations have been materially influenced
by inflation in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, a situation which is
expected to continue for the foreseeable future.
SEASONALITY
The Company does not believe that its operations are seasonal in nature.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not Applicable.
32
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements required to be filed under this Item are presented
commencing on page F-1 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, and are incorporated
herein by reference. The supplementary financial information required to be
disclosed under this Item is presented below:
SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
$'000 QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
(EXCEPT NET ENDED ENDED ENDED ENDED ENDED ENDED ENDED ENDED
LOSS PER 12/31/05 9/30/05 6/30/05 3/31/05 12/31/04 9/30/04 6/30/04 3/31/04
SHARE WHICH
IS STATED IN $)
Earned Revenues $8 $8 $9 $ 10 $12 $3 $7 $27
Direct Costs 6 6 6 7 8 2 5 19
Gross profit 2 2 3 3 4 1 2 8
Operating Loss (491) (542) (356) (212) (263) (417) (413) (381)
Net Loss
Attributable to (527) (575) (393) (250) (300) (500) (492) (456)
Common Stockholders
Net loss per share (.01) (.01) (.01) (.01) (.00) (.01) (.02) (.02)
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Information required pursuant to this Item has been previously reported, that on
January 6, 2004, upon recommendation and approval of the Company's Board of
Directors, the Company dismissed Travis, Wolff & Company, LLP and engaged Holtz
Rubenstein Reminick LLP as the Company's independent auditors for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2003. There were no "disagreements" or "reportable
events" that were required to be disclosed.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the Company's most recently completed fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) covered by
this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of
the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer, of
the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures pursuant
to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the
Company's Chief Executive Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to
be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the
Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within
the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There have been no changes in the Company's internal controls over financial
reporting that occurred during the Company's last fiscal quarter to which this
report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
33
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
34
PART III
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the directors and
executive officers of the Company as of March 15, 2006:
NAME AGE POSITION
Mark Weinreb 53 Director, President & Chief Executive Officer
Larry A. May 56 Chief Financial Officer
Catherine M. Vaczy 44 Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Wayne Marasco 52 Director
Joseph Zuckerman 54 Director
MARK WEINREB
PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR
Mr. Weinreb joined the Company on February 6, 2003 as a Director, Chief
Executive Officer and President. In 1976, Mr. Weinreb joined Bio Health
Laboratories, Inc., a state-of-the-art medical diagnostic laboratory providing
clinical testing services for physicians, hospitals, and other medical
laboratories. He progressed to become the laboratory administrator in 1978 and
then an owner and the laboratory's Chief Operating Officer in 1982. Here he
oversaw all technical and business facets, including finance, laboratory science
technology and all the additional support departments. He left Bio Health Labs
in 1989 when he sold the business to a biotechnology company listed on the New
York Stock Exchange. In 1992, Mr. Weinreb founded Big City Bagels, Inc., a
national chain of franchised upscale bagel bakeries and became Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of such entity. The company went public in 1995 and in
1999 he redirected the company and completed a merger with an Internet service
provider. In 2000, Mr. Weinreb became the Chief Executive Officer of Jestertek,
Inc., a 12-year old software development company pioneering gesture recognition
and control using advanced inter-active proprietary video technology. In 2002,
he left Jestertek after arranging additional financing. Mr. Weinreb received a
Bachelor of Arts degree in 1975 from Northwestern University and a Master of
Science degree in 1982 in Medical Biology, from C.W. Post, Long Island
University.
LARRY A. MAY
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Larry A. May joined the Company in connection with the NeoStem acquisition, and
effective March 1, 2006, is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Mr. May,
the former Treasurer of Amgen (one of the world's largest biotechnology
companies), initially became affiliated with Phase III Medical to assist with
licensing activities in September 2003. For the last 20 years, Mr. May has
worked in the areas of life science and biotechnology. From 1983 to 1998, Mr.
May worked for Amgen as Corporate Controller (1983 to 1988), Vice
President/Corporate Controller/Chief Accounting Officer (1988 to 1997), and Vice
President/Treasurer (1997 to 1998). At Amgen, Mr. May helped build its
accounting, finance and IT organizations. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. May served as
the Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer of Biosource
International, Inc., a provider of biologic research reagents and assays. From
2000 to May 2003, Mr. May served as the Chief Financial Officer of Saronyx,
Inc., a company focused on developing productivity tools and secure
communication systems for research scientists. From August 2003 to present, Mr.
May served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
NeoStem. Mr. May received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business
Administration & Accounting in 1971 from the University of Missouri.
35
CATHERINE M. VACZY
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL
Ms. Vaczy joined the Company in April 2005 as Executive Vice President and
General Counsel. Ms. Vaczy is responsible for overseeing the Company's legal
affairs as well as assisting the Company in reviewing and evaluating business,
scientific and medical opportunities. From 1997 through 2003, Ms. Vaczy held
various senior positions at ImClone Systems Incorporated, a publicly-traded
company developing a portfolio of targeted biologic treatments to address the
medical needs of patients with a variety of cancers, most recently as its Vice
President, Legal and Associate General Counsel. While at ImClone, Ms. Vaczy
served as a key advisor in the day-to-day operations of the company and helped
forge a number of important strategic alliances, including a $1 billion
co-development agreement for Erbitux(R), the company's targeted therapy
currently approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal and head and neck
cancers. From 1988 through 1996, Ms. Vaczy served as a corporate attorney
advising clients in the life science industries at the New York City law firm of
Ross & Hardies. Ms. Vaczy received a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1983 from Boston
College and a Juris Doctor from St. John's University School of Law in 1988.
WAYNE MARASCO, M.D., PH.D.
DIRECTOR
Dr. Marasco joined the Board of Directors of the Company in June 2003. In August
2004 he was appointed the Company's Senior Scientific Advisor. Dr. Marasco is an
Associate Professor in the Department of Cancer Immunology & AIDS at the
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Associate Professor of Medicine in the
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School. Dr. Marasco is a licensed
physician-scientist with training in Internal Medicine and specialty training in
infectious diseases. His clinical practice sub-specialty is in the treatment of
immunocompromised (cancer, bone marrow and solid organ transplants) patients.
Dr. Marasco's research laboratory is primarily focused on the areas of antibody
engineering and gene therapy. New immuno- and genetic- therapies for HIV-1
infection / AIDS, HTLV-1, the etiologic agent in Adult T-cell Leukemia, and
other emerging infectious diseases such as SARS and Avian Influenza are being
studied. Dr. Marasco's laboratory is recognized internationally for its
pioneering development of intracellular antibodies (sFv) or "intrabodies" as a
new class of molecules for research and gene therapy applications. He is the
author of more than 70 peer reviewed research publications, numerous chapters,
books and monographs and has been an invited speaker at many national and
international conferences in the areas of antibody engineering, gene therapy and
AIDS. Dr. Marasco is also the Scientific Director of the National Foundation for
Cancer Research Center for Therapeutic Antibody Engineering (the "Center"). The
Center is located at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and will work with
investigators globally to develop new human monoclonal antibody drugs for the
treatment of human cancers.
In 1995, Dr. Marasco founded IntraImmune Therapies, Inc., a gene therapy and
antibody engineering company. He served as the Chairman of the Scientific
Advisory Board until the company was acquired by Abgenix in 2000. He has also
served as a scientific advisor to several biotechnology companies working in the
field of antibody engineering, gene discovery and gene therapy. He is an
inventor on numerous issued and pending patent applications.
JOSEPH ZUCKERMAN, M.D.
DIRECTOR
Joseph D. Zuckerman joined the Board of Directors of the Company in January
2004. Since 1997, Dr. Zuckerman has been Chairman of the NYU-Hospital for Joint
Diseases Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Walter A. L. Thompson
Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the New York University School of Medicine.
He is responsible for one of the largest departments of orthopaedic surgery in
the country, providing orthopaedic care at five different hospitals including
Tisch Hospital, the Hospital for Joint Diseases, Bellevue Hospital Center, the
Manhattan Veteran's Administration Medical Center and Jamaica Hospital. He is
also the Director of the Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Program, which trains
more than 60 residents in a five year program.
36
Dr. Zuckerman was President of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and
Chair of the Council on Education for the American Academy of Orthopaedic
Surgeons. He recently developed and successfully implemented a sponsorship
program between the hospital and the New York Mets. His clinical practice is
focused on shoulder surgery and hip and knee replacement and he is the author or
editor of ten textbooks, 60 chapters and more than 200 articles in the
orthopaedic and scientific literature.
SIGNIFICANT EMPLOYEES
DENIS RODGERSON, PH.D.
DIRECTOR OF STEM CELL SCIENCE
Denis Rodgerson, Ph.D., the Company's Director of Stem Cell Science, joined
Phase III in connection with the NeoStem acquisition. Dr. Rodgerson, one of the
original founders of NeoStem, has over 36 years experience managing large
tertiary care and reference clinical laboratories with many patents and articles
to his credit. Prior to joining NeoStem, he co-founded StemCyte, and oversaw the
company to the world's second largest allogeneic umbilical cord stem cell bank
with multinational collection centers. His career has included being the
Vice-Chairman and Professor of the Department of Pathology and Laboratory
Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles ("UCLA") and Director of
Pediatric Laboratories and Analytical Toxicology Service at the University of
Colorado. At UCLA, where he was the Head of Clinical Chemistry and Toxicology
and Clinical Laboratory Computing, he was in charge of a laboratory and
administrative staff of more than 300 with an annual operating budget of $12
million and revenues of $60 million. Prior to UCLA, he held the positions of
Director of Pediatric Laboratories and Analytical Toxicology Service at the
University of Colorado for 12 years. He is a Fellow of the Association of
Clinical Scientists and Institute of Medical Laboratory Science. As a
long-standing member of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry, he
served on its Board of Directors and was the Chairman of the 1969 National
Meeting and many other committees. The committees that he has served on at UCLA
and the University of California system-wide, include serving as the Director of
the Office of Industry Relations, Chairman of the System-wide Library Committee,
member of the System-wide Committee on Information Transfer and Technology
Policy and the President's Task-Force on the California Digital Library. Dr.
Rodgerson has published more than 150 articles in the medical and scientific
literature. He has held consulting positions for many institutions and
corporations, including NASA, National Bureau of Standards, Hewlett Packard,
Beckman Instruments, Hybridtech, Boehringer-Mannheim Corporation, 3M Company,
Warren-Teed Pharmaceuticals, Micromedic Systems, Ortho Diagnostics, National
Health Laboratories, Consolidated Biomedical Laboratories, Bio-Dynamics, Inc.,
Fisher Scientific, E. I. DuPont de Nemours, Ciba Pharmaceuticals, DNA
Technology, and Diagnostic Products Corporation. Dr. Rodgerson received his M.S.
and Ph.D. from the University of Colorado.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Because of the Company's recent
reorganization and implementation of its new business plan, and its ongoing
efforts to engage qualified board members under its new business plan, the
Company does not have a separately designated audit committee, nominating
committee or compensation committee at this time and the entire Board of
Directors acts in such capacities. Accordingly, the Company's Board of Directors
also has determined that the Company does not have an audit committee financial
expert. The Company continues to seek new board members in order to implement
its reorganization and new business plan, and appoint a separately designated
audit committee.
37
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's
directors and officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class
of the Company's equity securities, to file initial reports of ownership and
reports of changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
These persons are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission to furnish
the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file. Based
solely on the Company's review of these reports and written representations
furnished to the Company, the Company believes that in 2005 each of the
reporting persons complied with these filing requirements, except that one such
report was inadvertently not timely filed by Dr. Joseph Zuckerman.
CODE OF ETHICS
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the Company's
principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting
officer or controller (or persons performing similar functions). A copy of such
Code of Ethics has been filed as Exhibit 14.1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003.
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the aggregate compensation paid during the three
years ended December 31, 2005 to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and all
other executive officers of the Company who earned in excess of $100,000 for
services rendered during fiscal 2005 (the "Named Executive Officers").
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Compensation Long Term Compensation
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Securities
All Other Restricted Underlying
Name and Principal YEAR SALARY BONUS COMPENSATION STOCK AWARDS OPTIONS/SAR'S
---- ------ ----- ------------ ------------ -------------
POSITION
Mark Weinreb (1) 2005 $245,741(2) $20,000 $18,500(3) $150,000 6,550,000
Chief Executive Officer 2004 $203,192 $20,000 $18,500(3) - 2,550,000
2003 $157,154 - $18,500(3) - 2,500,000
Robert Aholt, Jr. (4) 2005 $173,079(5) - $9,000(6) - 1,500,000
Chief Operating Officer 2004 - - - -
2003 - - - -
Catherine Vaczy (7) 2005 $97,062 - $6,000(6) - 1,100,000
(8)
Executive Vice President
and General Counsel 2004 - - - -
2003 - - - -
(1) Mr. Weinreb joined the Company as of February 6, 2003.
(2) Payment of $201,391 of this amount was deferred and is currently
outstanding. The Company and Mr. Weinreb are currently in discussions
relating to the method by which such deferred amount will be satisfied,
which could include the issuance of shares of Common Stock to Mr. Weinreb
in full or partial payment of such amount.
(3) Consists of (i) a car allowance of $12,000 and (ii) approximately $6,500
paid by the Company on behalf of Mr. Weinreb for disability insurance.
(4) Mr. Aholt joined the Company as of September 13, 2004.
38
(5) Payment of $57,940 of this amount was deferred. Mr. Aholt has resigned from
his position with the Company. On March 31, 2006 the Company and Mr. Aholt
entered into a Settlement Agreement and General Release relating to the
satisfaction of this and certain severance obligations. In addition,
$64,200 of the $173,079 was paid to Mr. Aholt in the form of shares of
Common Stock with a per share price equal to the fair market value of the
Common Stock on the date such amount was converted into shares of Common
Stock.
(6) Consists of a car allowance per the Named Executive Officer's employment
agreement with the Company.
(7) Ms. Vaczy joined the Company as of April 20, 2005.
(8) Payment of $17,885 of this amount was deferred and is currently
outstanding. The Company and Ms. Vaczy are currently in discussions
relating to the method by which such deferred amount will be satisfied,
which could include the issuance of shares of Common Stock to Ms. Vaczy in
full or partial payment of such amount. In addition, $48,138 of this amount
was paid to Ms. Vaczy in the form of shares of Common Stock with a per
share price equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date
such amount was converted into shares of Common Stock.
39
OPTION GRANTS
The following table provides certain information with respect to options granted
to the Company's Named Executive Officers during the fiscal year ended December
31, 2005:
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
PERCENT OF POTENTIAL REALIZABLE VALUE
TOTAL AT ASSUMED ANNUAL RATES OF
NUMBER OF OPTIONS EXERCISE MARKET STOCK PRICE APPRECIATION
SECURITIES GRANTED TO PRICE PRICE ON FOR OPTION TERM(1)
UNDERLYING EMPLOYEES PER SHARE DATE OF ------------------------------
OPTIONS IN GRANT EXPIRATION
NAME GRANTED FISCAL YEAR ($) ($) DATE 5% 10%
------------------------------- -------------- ----------- ---------- ------------- -------------- ----------------
Mark Weinreb
2,500,000(2) 100% $.03 $.03 2-14-13 $53,275 $129,257
50,000(2) 6% $.10 $.10 9-13-14 $8,552 $13,617
4,000,000(3) 43% $.06 $.05 7-19-15 $325,779 $518,748
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Aholt, Jr. 1,500,000(4) 16% $.06 $.05 7-19-15 $122,167 $194,531
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Catherine Vaczy
150,000(5) 2% $.10 $.05 4-19-15 $12,217 $19,453
750,000(6) 8% $.06 $.05 7-19-15 $61,084 $97,265
200,000(2) 2% $.06 $.06 12-21-15 $16,289 $25,937
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") requires disclosure of
the potential realizable value or present value of each grant. The 5% and
10% assumed annual rates of compounded stock price appreciation are
mandated by rules of the SEC and do not represent the Company's estimate or
projection of the Company's future Common Stock prices. The disclosure
assumes the options will be held for the full ten-year term prior to
exercise. Such options may be exercised prior to the end of such ten-year
term. The actual value, if any, an executive officer may realize will
depend on the excess of the stock price over the exercise price on the date
the option is exercised. There can be no assurance that the stock price
will appreciate at the rates shown in the table.
(2) These options vested in their entirety on the date of grant.
(3) These options vested as to 2,000,000 shares on the date of grant and are
scheduled to vest as to an additional 1,000,000 shares on each of the first
and second anniversaries of the date of grant.
(4) These options vested as to 1,000,000 shares on the date of grant and were
scheduled to vest as to an additional 250,000 shares on each of the first
and second anniversaries of the date of grant. However, due to Mr. Aholt's
resignation from the Company prior to the first anniversary of the date of
grant, the option shall not vest as to any additional shares as provided in
the Company's 2003 Equity Participation Plan.
(5) These options are scheduled to vest as to 50,000 shares on each of the
first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant.
(6) These options are scheduled to vest as to 375,000 shares on each of the
first and second anniversaries of the date of grant.
40
OPTION EXERCISES AND HOLDINGS
The following table provides information concerning options exercised during
2005 and the value of unexercised options held by each of the Named Executive
Officers at December 31, 2005.
OPTION VALUES AT DECEMBER 31, 2005
NUMBER OF
SHARES SECURITIES UNDERLYING
ACQUIRED UNEXERCISED OPTIONS VALUE OF
ON AT DECEMBER 31, 2005 IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS AT
EXERCISE VALUE (# OF SHARES) DECEMBER 31, 2005 ($)(1)
---------------------------------- -------------------------------------
NAME (# SHARES) REALIZED EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
---------------------------------------- ----------------- ----------------- -----------------------------------
Mark Weinreb - - 4,550,000 2,000,000 $165,000 $40,000
Robert Aholt, - - 1,000,000 500,000 $20,000 $10,000
Jr.
Catherine Vaczy - - 200,000 900,000 $4,000 $15,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Based on $0.08 per share, the closing price of the Company's Common Stock,
as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board, on December 30, 2005.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
On February 6, 2003, Mr. Weinreb was appointed President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company and the Company entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Weinreb. The employment agreement had an initial term of three years, with
automatic annual extensions unless terminated by the Company or Mr. Weinreb at
least 90 days prior to an applicable anniversary date. The Company had agreed to
pay Mr. Weinreb an annual salary of $180,000 for the initial year of the term,
$198,000 for the second year of the term, and $217,800 for the third year of the
term. In addition, he was entitled to an annual bonus in the amount of $20,000
for the initial year in the event, and concurrently on the date, that the
Company received debt and/or equity financing in the aggregate amount of at
least $1,000,000 since the beginning of his service, and $20,000 for each
subsequent year of the term, without condition.
In addition, the Company, pursuant to its newly adopted 2003 Equity
Participation Plan ("2003 EPP"), entered into a stock option agreement with Mr.
Weinreb (the "initial option agreement"). Under the initial option agreement,
the Company granted Mr. Weinreb the right and option, exercisable for 10 years,
to purchase up to 2,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise
price of $0.03 per share and otherwise upon the terms set forth in the initial
option agreement. In addition, in the event that the closing price of the
Company's common stock equals or exceeds $0.50 per share for any five
consecutive trading days during the term of the employment agreement (whether
during the initial term or an annual extension), the Company agreed to grant to
Mr. Weinreb, on the day immediately following the end of the five day period, an
option for the purchase of an additional 2,500,000 shares of the Company's
common stock for an exercise price of $0.50 per share, pursuant to the 2003 EPP
and a stock option agreement to be entered into between the Company and Mr.
Weinreb containing substantially the same terms as the initial option agreement,
except for the exercise price and that the option would be treated as an
"incentive stock option" for tax purposes only to the maximum extent permitted
by law (the "additional option agreement"). The Company agreed to promptly file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Registration Statement on Form S-8
(the "registration statement") pursuant to which the issuance of the shares
covered by the 2003 EPP, as well as the resale of the common stock issuable upon
exercise of the initial option agreement, are registered, which has been filed.
Additionally, the Company agreed, following any grant under the additional
option agreement, to promptly file a post-effective amendment to the
registration statement pursuant to which the common stock issuable upon exercise
thereof would be registered for resale. Mr. Weinreb agreed that he would not
resell publicly any shares of the Company's common stock obtained upon exercise
of any initial option agreement or the additional option agreement prior to the
first anniversary of the date of the employment agreement.
41
On May 4, 2005, the Board voted to approve an amendment to Mr. Weinreb's
employment agreement, subject to approval of the stockholders which was obtained
on July 20, 2005, pursuant to which Mr. Weinreb's employment agreement was
amended to (a) extend the expiration date thereof from February 2006 to December
2008; (b) change Mr. Weinreb's annual base salary of $217,800 (with an increase
of 10% per annum) to an annual base salary of $250,000 (with no increase per
annum); (c) grant Mr. Weinreb 3,000,000 shares of common stock, 1,000,000 shares
of which shall vest on each of the date of grant and the first and second
anniversaries of the date of grant; (d) amend the severance provision of the
existing employment agreement to provide that in the event of termination
without cause (subject to certain exceptions), Mr. Weinreb will be entitled to
receive a lump sum payment equal to his then base salary and automobile
allowance for a period of one year; (e) commencing in August 2006, increase Mr.
Weinreb's annual bonus from $20,000 to $25,000; (f) in August 2005, pay Mr.
Weinreb $15,000 to cover costs incurred by him on behalf of the Company; and (g)
in 2006, provide for the reimbursement of all premiums in an annual aggregate
amount of up to $18,000 payable by Mr. Weinreb for life and long term care
insurance covering each year during the remainder of the term of his employment.
On August 12, 2004 ("Commencement Date") the Company and Dr. Wayne A. Marasco, a
Company Director, entered into a Letter Agreement appointing Dr. Marasco as the
Company's Senior Scientific Advisor. Pursuant thereto, Dr. Marasco was
responsible for assisting the Company in reviewing and evaluating business,
scientific and medical opportunities, and for other discussions and meetings
that arise during the normal course of the Company conducting business. For his
services, during a three year period ("Term"), Dr. Marasco was entitled to
annual cash compensation with increases each year of the Term and an additional
cash compensation based on a percentage of collected revenues derived from the
Company's royalty or revenue sharing agreements. Although the annual cash
compensation and additional cash compensation stated above began to accrue as of
the Commencement Date, Dr. Marasco was not be entitled to receive any such
amounts until the Company raises $1,500,000 in additional equity financing after
the Commencement Date. In addition, Dr. Marasco was granted an option, fully
vested, to purchase 675,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise
price of $.10 cents per share. The shares will be subject to a one year lockup
as of the date of grant. The exercise period will be ten years, and the grant
will otherwise be in accordance with the Company's 2003 EPP and Non-Qualified
Stock Option Grant Agreement.
On May 4, 2005, the Board voted to approve an amendment to Dr. Marasco's Letter
Agreement, subject to approval of the stockholders which was obtained on July
20, 2005, pursuant to which Dr. Marasco's Letter Agreement with the Company was
amended to (a) extend the term of the Letter Agreement from August 2007 to
August 2008; (b) provide for an annual salary of $110,000, $125,000 and $150,000
for the years ended August 2006, 2007 and 2008, payable in each such year during
the term; (c) provide for a minimum annual bonus of $12,000, payable in January
of each year during the term, commencing in January 2006; (d) eliminate Dr.
Marasco's right under his existing Letter Agreement to receive 5% of all
collected revenues derived from the Company's royalty or other revenue sharing
agreements (which right is subject to the limitation that the amount of such
additional cash compensation and Dr. Marasco's annual salary do not exceed, in
the aggregate, $200,000 per year); and (e) permit Dr. Marasco to begin receiving
all accrued but unpaid cash compensation under his Letter Agreement upon the
Company's consummation of any financing, whether equity or otherwise, pursuant
to which the Company raises $1,500,000.
On April 20, 2005 (the "Commencement Date"), the Company entered into a letter
agreement (the "Letter Agreement") with Catherine M. Vaczy pursuant to which Ms.
Vaczy serves as the Company's Executive Vice President and General Counsel.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Letter Agreement, the term of Ms.
Vaczy's employment in such capacity will be for a period of three (3) years from
the Commencement Date (the "Term"). In consideration for Ms. Vaczy's services
under the Letter Agreement, Ms. Vaczy will be entitled to receive an annual
salary of $155,000 during the first year of the Term, a minimum annual salary of
$170,500 during the second year of the Term, and a minimum annual salary of
$187,550 during the third year of the Term. Ms. Vaczy and the Company have
agreed that from the Commencement Date until the 90th day thereafter (the
"Initial 90 Day Period"), Ms. Vaczy's salary will be paid to her at a rate of
50% of the annual rate and accrue as to the remainder. At the end of the Initial
90 Day Period, and at the end of each additional 90 day period thereafter,
whether to continue to accrue salary at this rate and provision for payment of
accrued amounts will be discussed in good faith. Payment of accrued salary may
be made in cash, or, upon mutual agreement, shares of Common Stock. Any shares
42
of Common Stock issued in payment of accrued salary shall have a per share price
equal to the average closing price of one share of Common Stock on the Bulletin
Board (or other similar exchange or association on which the Common Stock is
then listed or quoted) for the five (5) consecutive trading days immediately
preceding the date of issue of such shares; provided, however, that if the
Common Stock is not then quoted on the Bulletin Board or otherwise listed or
quoted on an exchange or association, the price shall be the fair market value
of one share of Common Stock as of the date of issue as determined in good faith
by the Board of Directors of the Company. The number of shares of Common Stock
for any issuance in payment of accrued salary shall be equal to the quotient of
the amount of the accrued salary divided by the price. The shares issued will be
subject to a one-year lock of up as of the date of each grant and shall be
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission on a Registration
Statement on Form S-8.
Pursuant to Ms. Vaczy's Letter Agreement with the Company, on the Commencement
Date she was granted an option to purchase 150,000 shares of Common Stock (the
"Option") pursuant to the Company's 2003 EPP, with an exercise price equal to
$.10 per share. The Option vests and becomes exercisable as to 50,000 shares on
each of the first, second and third year anniversaries of the Commencement Date
and remains exercisable as to any vested portion thereof in accordance with the
terms of the 2003 EPP and the Incentive Stock Option Agreement.
In the event Ms. Vaczy's employment is terminated prior to the end of the Term
for any reason, earned but unpaid cash compensation and unreimbursed expenses
due as of the date of such termination will be payable in full. In addition, in
the event Ms. Vaczy's employment is terminated prior to the end of the Term for
any reason other than by the Company with Cause or Ms. Vaczy without Good
Reason, Ms. Vaczy or her executor of her last will or the duly authorized
administrator of her estate, as applicable, will be entitled (i) in the event
the employment termination date is after April 20, 2006, to receive severance
payments equal to Ms. Vaczy's then one year's salary, paid in accordance with
the Company's standard payroll practices for executives of the Company and (ii)
in the event the employment termination date is before April 20, 2006 but after
October 20, 2005, to receive severance payments equal to one-sixth of Ms.
Vaczy's then one year's salary, paid in accordance with the Company's standard
payroll practices for executives of the Company. In addition, in the event Ms.
Vaczy's employment is terminated prior to the end of the Term by the Company
without Cause or by Ms. Vaczy for Good Reason, the Option granted to Ms. Vaczy
(described above), shall vest and become immediately exercisable in its entirety
and remain exercisable in accordance with its terms. No other payments shall be
made, nor benefits provided, by the Company in connection with the termination
of employment prior to the end of the Term, except as otherwise required by law.
In January 2006, Ms. Vaczy's Letter Agreement was amended to provide that (i)
regardless of her employment termination date, severance payments payable to her
would equal her then one year's salary and (ii) no severance payments would be
payable without Ms. Vaczy first providing the Company with a release in
customary form.
In August 2005, Ms. Vaczy's Letter Agreement was amended to provide that (i) as
of October 1, 2005 she will cease to accrue salary and will as of that date
begin to receive payment of salary solely in cash in accordance with the
Company's standard payroll practices, and (ii) will be issued in payment of
salary accruing during the period that commenced on April 20, 2005 and ended on
September 30, 2005, shares of Common Stock. With respect to the portion of
salary that accrued from April 20, 2005 through August 12, 2005, the price per
share will be $.06, the closing price of the Common Stock on August 12, 2005.
For the portion of salary that accrued from August 13, 2005 through September
30, 2005, the price per share will be the closing price of the Common Stock on
September 30, 2005. Pursuant to the foregoing, on August 12, 2005, Ms. Vaczy was
issued 412,339 shares of Common Stock in payment of $24,740 in accrued salary
and on October 3, 2005, Ms. Vaczy was issued 260,817 shares in payment of
$10,433 in accrued salary. On December 22, 2005, the Company and Ms. Vaczy
entered into a letter agreement pursuant to which Ms. Vaczy agreed to accept
416,666 shares of Common Stock in payment of $25,000 of additional accrued
salary. The price per share was equal to $.06, the closing price of a share of
Common Stock on the date of the agreement.
In connection with the Company's acquisition of the assets of NeoStem on January
19, 2006, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Larry A. May.
Mr. May is the former Chief Executive Officer of NeoStem. Pursuant to Mr. May's
employment agreement, he is to serve as an officer of the Company reporting to
the CEO for a term of three years, subject to earlier termination as provided in
the agreement. In return, Mr. May will be paid an annual salary of $165,000,
payable in accordance with the Company's standard payroll practices, will be
entitled to participate in the Company's benefit plans generally available to
43
other executives, including a car allowance equal to $750 per month and was
granted on his commencement date an employee stock option under the Company's
2003 EPP to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at a per share
purchase price equal to $.05, the closing price of the Common Stock on the
commencement date, which vests as to 50,000 shares of Common Stock on the first,
second and third anniversaries of the commencement date. Under certain
circumstances, Mr. May is also entitled to a severance payment equal to one
year's salary in the event of the early termination of his employment.
In connection with the Company's acquisition of the assets of NeoStem on January
19, 2006, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Denis O.
Rodgerson. Dr. Rodgerson is one of the founders of NeoStem. Dr. Rodgerson's
employment agreement is identical to Mr. May's employment agreement, except that
(i) its term is one year; (ii) he was granted an option to purchase 50,000
shares of Common Stock under the EPP vesting in its entirety after one year; and
(iii) his agreement does not contain a provision for severance.]
On January 20, 2006, Mr. Robert Aholt, Jr. tendered his resignation as Chief
Operating Officer of the Company. In connection therewith, on March 31, 2006,
the Company and Mr. Aholt entered into a Settlement Agreement and General
Release (the "Settlement Agreement"). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the
Company agrees to pay to Mr. Aholt the aggregate sum of $250,000 (less
applicable Federal and California state and local withholdings and payroll
deductions), payable over a period of two years in biweekly installments of
$4,807.69 commencing on April 7, 2006, except that the first payment will be in
the amount of $9,615,38. In the event the Company breaches its payment
obligations under the Settlement Agreement and such breach remains uncured, the
full balance owed shall become due. The Company and Mr. Aholt each provided
certain general releases. Mr. Aholt also agrees to continue to be bound by his
obligations not to compete with the Company and to maintain the confidentiality
of Company proprietary information. Following is a summary of Mr. Aholt's
previous employment arrangements.
On September 13, 2004, ("Commencement Date") the Company entered into a letter
agreement (the "Letter Agreement") with Mr. Aholt pursuant to which the Company
appointed Mr. Aholt as its Chief Operating Officer. Subject to the terms and
conditions of the Letter Agreement, the term of Mr. Aholt's employment in such
capacity was for a period of three (3) years from the Commencement Date (the
"Term").
In consideration for Mr. Aholt's services under the Letter Agreement, Mr. Aholt
was entitled to receive a monthly salary of $4,000 during the first year of the
Term, $5,000 during the second year of the Term, and $6,000 during the third
year of the Term. In further consideration for Mr. Aholt's services under the
Letter Agreement, on January 1, 2005 and on the first day of each calendar
quarter thereafter during the Term, Mr. Aholt was entitled to receive shares of
Common Stock with a "Dollar Value" of $26,750, $27,625 and $28,888,
respectively, during the first, second and third years of the Term. The per
share price (the "Price") of each share granted to determine the Dollar Value
was to be the average closing price of one share of Common Stock on the Bulletin
Board (or other similar exchange or association on which the Common Stock is
then listed or quoted) for the five (5) consecutive trading days immediately
preceding the date of grant of such shares; provided, however, that if the
Common Stock was not then listed or quoted on an exchange or association, the
Price would be the fair market value of one share of Common Stock as of the date
of grant as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Company.
The number of shares of Common Stock for each quarterly grant was to be equal to
the quotient of the Dollar Value divided by the Price. The shares granted were
subject to a one year lockup as of the date of each grant. Mr. Aholt received
477,679 shares of the Company's Common Stock on January 1, 2005, 800,898 shares
on April 1, 2005 and 668,750 shares on July 1, 2005.
In the event Mr. Aholt's employment was terminated prior to the end of the Term
for any reason, earned but unpaid cash compensation and unreimbursed expenses
due as of the date of such termination was to be payable in full. In addition,
in the event Mr. Aholt's employment was terminated prior to the end of the Term
for any reason other than by the Company with cause, Mr. Aholt or his executor
of his last will or the duly authorized administrator of his estate, as
applicable, was to be entitled (i) to receive severance payments equal to one
year's salary, paid at the same level and timing of salary as Mr. Aholt was then
receiving and (ii) to receive, during the one (1) year period following the date
of such termination, the stock grants that Mr. Aholt would have been entitled to
receive had his employment not been terminated prior to the end of the Term;
provided, however, that in the event such termination was by the Company without
cause or was upon Mr. Aholt's resignation for good reason, such severance
payment and grant was to be subject to Mr. Aholt's execution and delivery to the
Company of a release of all claims against the Company.
On May 4, 2005, the Board voted to approve an amendment to Mr. Aholt's Letter
Agreement, subject to approval of the stockholders which was obtained on July
20, 2005, to (a) replace the provision of Mr. Aholt's existing employment
agreement pursuant to which he would be compensated in shares of Common Stock
with a provision pursuant to which he would be compensated solely in cash,
effective as of September 30, 2005; (b) replace the provision of Mr. Aholt's
existing employment agreement pursuant to which his compensation accrued on a
monthly and/or quarterly basis with a provision pursuant to which his
compensation would be paid in accordance with the Company's normal payroll
practices, effective as of September 30, 2005; and (c) provide for a minimum
annual bonus of $12,000, payable in January of each year during the term of his
employment, commencing in January 2006.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive additional
compensation for serving as directors. Independent (non-employee) directors of
the Company are reimbursed for out-of-pocket travel expenses incurred in their
capacity as directors of the Company. Independent directors also receive options
to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock upon joining the Board
pursuant to the Company's 2003 EPP, and thereafter receive an annual grant to
purchase 50,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock on the date of the
Company's annual stockholder's meeting (although no director may receive more
than one grant of such options in any calendar year). The Company's only current
independent director, Joseph Zuckerman, has thus far received options to
purchase 350,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock pursuant to the Company's
2003 EPP pursuant to this standard arrangement. In addition, in July 2005 the
shareholders approved a one-time grant to Dr. Zuckerman of an option to purchase
1,500,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at $0.06 per share (which was
greater than the market price on the date the Board approved the grant), with
respect to which the option to purchase 1,000,000 shares vested immediately upon
the date of grant and 250,000 shares shall vest on each of the first and second
anniversaries of the date of grant. Upon achieving certain target increases in
stock price for a defined period of time during an existing independent
director's tenure, the Company has agreed to grant each director an additional
option to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock substantially
upon the same terms of the options to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company's
Common Stock previously granted, except for the exercise price of such options.
Thus far, no such options have been granted.
44
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information as to the number of shares of the
Company's Common Stock beneficially owned, as of March 1, 2006 by (i) each
beneficial owner of more than five percent of the outstanding Common Stock, (ii)
each current executive officer and director and (iii) all current executive
officers and directors of the Company as a group. All shares are owned both
beneficially and of record unless otherwise indicated. Unless otherwise
indicated, the address of each beneficial owner is c/o Phase III Medical, Inc.,
330 South Service Road, Suite 120, Melville, New York 11747.
NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OWNED
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage
Name and Address of Number of Shares Beneficially of Common Stock
Beneficial Holder (1) Owned (2) Beneficially Owned (2)
--------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------
Mark Weinreb 8,185,000 (3) 9.50%
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Dr. Wayne Marasco 3,608,333 (4) 4.48%
Senior Scientific Advisor and Director
Dr. Joseph Zuckerman 2,135,000 (5) 2.67%
Director
Catherine M. Vaczy 5,956,488 (6) 7.56%
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Dr. Armando Munoz 6,666,666 (7) 8.49%
Caribbean Stem Cell Group, Inc.
Box 800982-00780-0982
Cotto Laurel, Puerto Rico 00780
Larry A. May, Chief Financial Officer 639,969 (8) <1%
Robert Aholt, Jr 12,191,024 (9) 15.90%
20128 Cavern Court
Saugus, Los Angeles, CA 91390
All Directors and Officers as a group (five persons) 20,330,969(10) 23.02%
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Unless otherwise noted, each stockholder's address is in care of Phase III
Medical, Inc., 330 South Service Road, Suite 120, Melville, New York 11747.
2. The percentage of Common Stock owned by each stockholder is calculated by
dividing (i) the number of shares deemed to be beneficially owned by such
stockholder as of March 1, 2006, as determined in accordance with Rule
13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), by (ii) the sum of (A) 78,571,087 which is the number of shares of
Common Stock outstanding as of March 1, 2006, plus (B) the number of shares
of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of currently exercisable options and
warrants held by such stockholder. For purposes of this security ownership
table, "currently exercisable options and warrants" consist of options and
warrants exercisable as of March 1, 2006 or within 60 days after March 1,
2006. Except as indicated by footnote, the stockholder has sole voting and
investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock shown as
beneficially owned by such stockholder.
3. Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 4,550,000 shares of
Common Stock; 3,000,000 shares of restricted Common Stock, vested as to
1,000,000 shares.
45
4. Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 2,025,000 shares of
Common Stock.
5. Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 1,350,000 shares of
Common Stock.
6. Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 250,000 shares of Common
Stock.
7. Includes 6,250,000 shares of Common Stock held by Caribbean Stem Cell
Group, Inc. of which Dr. Munoz is President.
8. Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 400,000 shares of Common
Stock. Mr. May became the Chief Financial Officer of the Company effective
March 1, 2006.
9. Includes 7,282,913 shares of Common Stock owned by the Robert J. Aholt, Jr.
Family Trust dated 2/17/97 of which Mr. Aholt is Trustee and currently
exercisable options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock.
10. Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 8,575,000 shares of
Common Stock.
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
On September 13, 2004, the Company and the Robert Aholt, Jr. Family Trust dated
2/17/97 (the "trust"), the trustee of which is Robert Aholt, Jr., the Company's
Chief Operating Officer, entered into a subscription agreement (the
"subscription agreement"), pursuant to which the Company sold to the trust
7,282,913 shares of common stock of the Company in exchange for $650,000.
Pursuant to the subscription agreement, the Company and Mr. Aholt agreed that
upon maturity of a promissory note made by the Company in favor of Mr. Aholt on
or about August 30, 2004 (the "note"), the Company would repay the note in
shares of common stock, at a per share conversion price equal to 85% of the
average of the closing price of one share of common stock on the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (the
"Bulletin Board") for the five (5) days immediately preceding the maturity date
of the note, or, if the common stock is not then traded on the Bulletin Board,
at 85% of fair market value as determined by the Board. The note, which was made
in the principal amount of $100,000, bore interest at a rate of 20% per annum
and matured on February 28, 2005. On February 20, 2005, Mr. Aholt converted the
principal amount of the note and all accrued interest into 1,960,784 shares of
common stock.
Mark Weinreb, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, has from time
to time loaned money to the Company to help fund its operations. In 2004 and
2005, Mr. Weinreb loaned the Company a total of $35,000 and $48,000,
respectively. All such loans were represented by promissory notes of the Company
which bore interest at the rate of 8%. To date, an aggregate of $48,000 in
principal has been repaid and $35,000 has been converted into 595,000 shares of
Common Stock.
On April 20, 2005, the Company and Catherine M. Vaczy, the Company's Executive
Vice President and General Counsel, entered into a stock purchase agreement (the
"Vaczy Stock Purchase Agreement"), pursuant to which the Company sold to Ms.
Vaczy 1,666,666 shares of Common Stock in exchange for $100,000. Pursuant to the
Vaczy Stock Purchase Agreement, for a period of 90 days, Ms. Vaczy had the right
to purchase up to an additional $200,000 of Common Stock at a per share price
equal to 85% of the average closing price of one share of Common Stock on the
Bulletin Board for the five (5) consecutive trading days immediately preceding
the date of Ms. Vaczy's notice exercising the option; provided, however, that in
no event would the price be less than $.06. Pursuant to the exercise of this
option, on July 18, 2005, Ms. Vaczy purchased 1,250,000 shares of Common Stock
at a per share purchase price of $.06 per share for aggregate consideration of
$75,000.
Also on April 20, 2005, Ms. Vaczy loaned to the Company the sum of $100,000 and
accepted from the Company a promissory note (the "Vaczy Note"). The Vaczy Note
bears interest at a rate of 15% and matures on April 20, 2006. Ms. Vaczy has the
option to convert it into shares of Common Stock at any time up until the 90th
day after the date of the Vaczy Note at a per share price equal to 85% of the
average closing price of one share of Common Stock on the Bulletin Board (or
other similar exchange or association on which the Common Stock is then listed
or quoted) for the five (5) consecutive trading days immediately preceding the
date of Ms. Vaczy's notice; provided, however, that if the Common Stock is not
then quoted on the Bulletin Board or otherwise listed or quoted on an exchange
or association, the price shall be the fair market value of one share of Common
Stock as of the date of issue as determined in good faith by the Board of
Directors of the Company; and further provided, that in no event shall the price
be less than $.06. Following the 90th day after the date of the Vaczy Note, Ms.
46
Vaczy is obligated, at any time prior to the date of maturity of the Vaczy Note,
to convert it into shares of Common Stock unless Ms. Vaczy shall have provided
to the Company a notice terminating her employment with the Company pursuant to
her Letter Agreement with the Company. Effective November 30, 2005, the Vaczy
Note was converted into 1,700,000 shares of Common Stock.
On January 19, 2006, the Company consummated the acquisition of the assets of
NeoStem. Larry May, the Company's Chief Financial Officer, was the Chief
Executive Officer of NeoStem at the time of the transaction. The purchase price
for NeoStem's assets, in addition to the assumption of certain liabilities,
included 5 million shares of the Company's Common Stock, of which Mr. May
received a pro rata distribution of 143,821 shares in exchange for his shares of
NeoStem preferred stock, and 96,148 shares of Company Common Stock as
consideration for existing debt owed by NeoStem to Mr. May. Of the stock
consideration paid to NeoStem, 60% (or 3 million shares) has been retained in
escrow for a period of one (1) year from the date of the agreement, subject to
certain indemnification claims and setoffs. Provided that no claims are made
against the escrowed shares, Mr. May will be entitled to receive up to 350,563
shares of Company Common Stock in escrow in exchange for his shares of NeoStem
common stock. In addition, upon the acquisition, Mr. May entered into a three
year employment agreement with the Company. See "Executive Compensation -
Employment Agreements."
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
All audit and audit-related work and all non-audit work performed by the
Company's independent accountants is approved in advance by the Board of
Directors of the Company, including the proposed fees for such work. The Board
is informed of each service actually rendered.
AUDIT FEES. Audit fees billed or expected to be billed to the Company by the
Company's principal accountant for the audit of the financial statements
included in the Company's Annual Reports on Form 10-K, and reviews of the
financial statements included in the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q,
for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 totaled approximately $32,000 and
$25,000, respectively.
AUDIT-RELATED FEES. The Company was billed $54,000 and $0 by the Company's
principal accountant for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to
the performance of the audit or review of the Company's financial statements and
are not reported under the caption Audit Fees above. Such fees were related to
an audit in connection with the Company's acquisition of the assets of NeoStem.
TAX FEES. The Company was billed or expected to be billed an aggregate of $8,000
and $7,350 by the Company's principal accountant for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, for tax services, principally advice
regarding the preparation of income tax returns.
ALL OTHER FEES. The Company incurred fees for the fiscal years ended December
31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, for all other services not specified above of
$0 and $0, respectively.
The Company's Board of Directors pre-approved the Company's engagement of Holtz
Rubenstein Reminick LLP to act as the Company's independent auditor for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003. The Company's independent
auditors performed all work only with its full time permanent employees.
47
PART IV
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following documents are being filed as part of this Report:
(a)(1) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Reference is made to the Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement
Schedule on Page F-1.
(a)(2) FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE:
Reference is made to the Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement
Schedule on Page F-1.
All other schedules have been omitted because the required information is not
present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the
schedule, or because the information required is included in the Financial
Statements or Notes thereto.
(a)(3) EXHIBITS:
3 (a) Certificate of Incorporation filed September 18, 1980 (1) 3
(b) Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation filed September 29, 1980 (1) 3
(c) Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation filed July 28, 1983 (2) 3(b)
(d) Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation filed February 10, 1984 (2) 3(d)
(e) Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation filed March 31, 1986 (3) 3(e)
(f) Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation filed March 23, 1987 (4) 3(g)
(g) Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation filed June 12, 1990 (5) 3.8
(h) Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation filed September 27, 1991 (6) 3.9
(i) Certificate of Designation filed November 12, 1994 (7) 3.8
(j) Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation filed September 28, 1995 (8) 3(j)
(k) Certificate of Designation for the Series B Preferred Stock
dated May 18, 1998 (9) C 3(f)
(l) Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation dated May 18, 1998 (9) A
(m) Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation filed July 24, 2003 (10) 3.1
(n) Amendment dated July 20, 2005 to Certificate of Incorporation (11) 3.2
(o) Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation filed March 24, 2006 (21) 3(o)
(p) Amended and Restated By-laws (11) 3.1
4 (a) Form of Underwriter's Warrant (6) 4.9.1
(b) Form of Promissory Note - September 2002 Offering (13) 4.1
(c) Form of Promissory Note - February 2003 Offering (13) 4.2
(d) Form of Promissory Note - March 2003 Offering (13) 4.3
10 (a) Employment Agreement dated as of February 6, 2003 by and between
Corniche Group Incorporated and Mark Weinreb* (14) 99.2
(b) Stock Option Agreement dated as of February 6, 2003 between
Corniche Group Incorporated and Mark Weinreb* (14) 99.3
(c] Corniche Group Incorporated 2003 Equity Participation Plan* (14) 99.4
(d) Form of Stock Option Agreement* (13) 10.2
(e) Royalty Agreement, dated as of December 5, 2003, by and between
Parallel Solutions, Inc. and Phase III Medical, Inc. (13)(14) 10.1
(f) Employment Agreement dated as of September 13, 2004 between Phase III Medical,
Inc. and Robert Aholt, Jr.* (15) 10.3
(g) Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 13, 2004, between Phase III
Medical, Inc. and the Aholt, Jr. Family Trust (15) 10.4
48
(h) Form of Promissory Note - Robert Aholt, Jr. dated August 30, 2004 (15) 10.5
(i) Letter Agreement dated as of August 12, 2004 by and between Phase III Medical,
Inc. and Dr. Wayne A. Marasco* (15) 10.6
(j) Board of Directors Agreement by and between Phase III Medical, Inc. and Joseph
Zuckerman* (15) 10.8
(k) Stock Purchase Agreement, dated April 20, 2005, between Phase III Medical,
Inc. and Catherine M. Vaczy (16) 10.1
(l) Promissory Note made by the Company in favor of Catherine M. Vaczy (16) 10.2
(m) Letter Agreement, dated April 20, 2005, between Phase III Medical, Inc.
and Catherine M. Vaczy* (16) 10.3
(n) Stock Option Agreement dated April 20, 2005, between Phase III Medical, Inc.
and Catherine M. Vaczy* (16) 10.4
(o) Amendment dated July 18, 2005 to Stock Purchase Agreement with
Catherine M. Vaczy dated April 20, 2005 (11) 10.1
(p) Amendment dated July 20, 2005 to Employment Agreement with
Mark Weinreb dated February 6, 2003* (11) 10.2
(q) Amendment dated July 20, 2005 to Employment Agreement with
Wayne A. Marasco dated August 12, 2004* (11) 10.3
(r) Amendment dated July 20, 2005 to Employment Agreement with
Robert Aholt dated September 13, 2004* (11) 10.4
(s) 203 Equity Participation Plan, as amended* (11) 99.1
(t) Form of Option Agreement dated July 20, 2005* (11) 10.5
(u) Form of Promissory Note Extension (11) 10.6
(v) Letter Agreement dated August 12, 2005 with Catherine M. Vaczy* (11) 10.7
(w) Restricted Stock Agreement with Mark Weinreb* (17) 10.8
(x) Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 6, 2005 by and among
Phase III Medical, Inc., Phase III Medical Holding Company, and
NeoStem, Inc. (18) 99.1
(y) Letter Agreement dated December 22, 2005 between Phase III Medical, Inc.
and Catherine M. Vaczy* (21) 10(y)
(z) Form of Convertible Promissory Note (19) 10.1
(aa) Employment Agreement between the Company and Larry A. May
dated January 19, 2006* (20) 10.1
(bb) Employment Agreement between the Company and Denis O. Rodgerson
dated January 19, 2006 (20) 10.2
(cc) Letter Agreement dated January 30, 2006 between Phase III Medical, Inc.
and Catherine M. Vaczy* (21) 10(cc)
(dd) Settlement Agreement and General Release dated March 31, 2006 between
Phase III Medical, Inc. and Robert Aholt, Jr. (21) 10(dd)
14 (a) Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers (13) 14.1
21 (a) Subsidiaries of the Registrant (21) 21.1
23 (a) Consent of Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP (12) 23.1
31 (a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (12) 31.1
31 (b) Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (12) 31.2
32 (a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (12) 32.1
32 (b) Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (12) 32.2
99 (a) Form of Warrant. (19) 99.1
49
Notes:
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed
as an exhibit to this Form 10-K pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.
(1) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the Company's registration statement on
Form S-18, File No. 2-69627, which exhibit is incorporated here by
reference.
(2) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the Company's registration statement on
Form S-2, File No. 2-88712, which exhibit is incorporated here by
reference.
(3) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the Company's registration statement on
Form S-2, File No. 33-4458, which exhibit is incorporated here by
reference.
(4) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the Company's annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 1987, which exhibit is
incorporated here by reference.
(5) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the Company's registration statement on
Form S-3, File No. 33-42154, which exhibit is incorporated here by
reference.
(6) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the
Company's registration statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-42154, which
exhibit is incorporated here by reference.
(7) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the Company's annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 1994, which exhibit is
incorporated here by reference.
(8) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the Company's annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended March 31, 1996, which exhibit is incorporated
here by reference.
(9) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit, as
indicated above, to the Company's proxy statement dated April 23, 1998,
which exhibit is incorporated here by reference.
(10) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the current report of the Company on
Form 8-K, dated July 24, 2003, which exhibit is incorporated here by
reference.
(11) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the quarterly report of the Company on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, which exhibit is
incorporated here by reference.
(12) Filed herewith.
(13) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the annual report of the Company on
Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2003, which exhibit is
incorporated here by reference. Certain portions of Exhibit 10(e)
(10.1) were omitted based upon a request for confidential treatment,
and the omitted portions were filed separately with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on a confidential basis.
(14) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the current report of the Company on
Form 8-K, dated February 6, 2003, which exhibit is incorporated here by
reference.
(15) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the Company's annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, which exhibit is
incorporated here by reference.
(16) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the current report of the Company on
Form 8-K, dated April 20, 2005, which exhibit is incorporated here by
reference.
50
(17) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the quarterly report of the Company on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, which exhibit is
incorporated here by reference.
(18) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the current report of the Company on
Form 8-K, dated December 6, 2005, which exhibit is incorporated here by
reference.
(19) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the current report of the Company on
Form 8-K, dated December 31, 2005, which exhibit is incorporated here
by reference.
(20) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the current report of the Company on
Form 8-K, dated January 19, 2006, which exhibit is incorporated here by
reference.
(21) Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to the Company's annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, which exhibit is
incorporated here by reference.
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PHASE III MEDICAL, INC.
BY:
/S/MARK WEINREB
MARK WEINREB, PRESIDENT
DATED: APRIL 5, 2006
52
PHASE III MEDICAL, INC.
Table of Contents
Page
-----------------------
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm -
Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP F - 1
Financial Statements:
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2005 and 2004 F - 2
Statements of Operations
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 F - 3
Statements of Stockholder's (Deficit)
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 F - 4
Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 F - 5
Notes to Financial Statements F - 7 - F - 25
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Phase III Medical, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Phase III Medical, Inc. as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related statements of operations,
stockholders' deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2005. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Phase III Medical, Inc. as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the results of its operations and cash flows for
each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2005 in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the
financial statements, the Company's recurring losses from operations raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's
plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.
/s/ HOLTZ RUBENSTEIN REMINICK LLP
Melville, New York
February 23, 2006, except for Note 12,
as to which the date is March 27, 2006
F-1
PHASE III MEDICAL, INC.
Balance Sheets
December 31,
---------------------------
2005 2004
------------ ------------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 488,872 $ 27,868
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets 18,447 21,233
------------ ------------
Total current assets 507,319 49,101
Property and equipment, net 1,488 3,446
Deferred acquisition costs 19,121 43,897
Other assets 114,753 3,000
------------ ------------
$ 642,681 $ 99,444
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Interest and dividends payable -
preferred stock $ 528,564 $ 480,880
Accounts payable 256,976 149,169
Accrued liabilities 617,196 88,883
Notes payable 135,000 475,000
Note payable - related party 48,000
Convertible debentures, related party -
net of debt discount of $5,882 - 94,118
Convertible debentures - net of
debt discount of $83,333 166,667 -
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 1,752,403 1,288,050
Unearned revenues 26,745 62,007
Series A mandatorily redeemable
convertible preferred stock 681,171 681,171
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Stockholders' deficit:
Preferred stock; authorized, 5,000,000
shares Series B convertible redeemable
preferred stock, liquidation value, 10
shares of common stock per share, $.01
par value; authorized, 825,000 shares;
issued and outstanding, 10,000 shares
at December 31, 2005 and at
December 31, 2004 100 100
Common stock, $.001par value; authorized,
500,000,000 shares; issued and
outstanding, 70,543,862 at December 31,
2005 and 41,029,552 shares at December
31, 2004 70,545 41,031
Additional paid-in capital 12,367,082 10,537,411
Accumulated deficit (14,255,365) (12,510,326)
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' deficit (1,817,638) (1,931,790)
------------ ------------
$ 642,681 $ 99,444
============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
F-2
PHASE III MEDICAL, INC.
Statements of Operations
Years ended December 31,
------------------------------------
2005 2004 2003
----------- ----------- -----------
Earned revenues $ 35,262 $ 48,561 $ 64,632
Direct Costs (24,776) (33,885) (43,608)
----------- ----------- -----------
Gross Profit 10,486 14,676 21,024
Selling, general and
administrative (1,611,398) (763,640) (685,353)
Purchase of medical royalty stream - (725,324) (80,000)
Realized loss on note receivable - (150,000)
----------- ----------- -----------
Operating loss (1,600,912) (1,474,288) (894,329)
Other income (expense):
Interest income 137 199 88,923
Interest expense - Series A
mandatorily redeemable
convertible preferred
stock (47,684) (47,684) (23,842)
Interest expense (96,580) (226,599) (214,897)
----------- ----------- -----------
(144,127) (274,084) (149,816)
Provision for income taxes - - -
----------- ----------- -----------
Loss before preferred dividend (1,745,039) (1,748,372) (1,044,145)
Preferred dividend - - (23,842)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net Loss attributable to common
stockholders $(1,745,039)$(1,748,372)$(1,067,987)
=========== =========== ===========
Basic earnings per share
Net loss attributable to common
stockholders $ (.04)$ (0.05)$ (0.05)
=========== =========== ===========
Weighted average common shares
outstanding 49,775,746 32,541,845 23,509,343
=========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
F-3
PHASE III MEDICAL, INC.
Statements of Stockholders' Deficit
Series B Common Stock Additional Accumulated Total
Convertible Paid-in Deficit
Preferred Capital
Stock
----------- -------------------
Shares Amount Shares Amount
------- ------ ----------- ------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Balance at December 31, 2002 10,000 $ 100 22,398,710 $22,399 $ 8,847,576 $ (9,693,967)$ (823,892)
Issuance of common stock for cash,
net of offering costs - - 2,825,000 2,825 211,956 - 214,781
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of
common stock options - - 1,000,000 1,000 4,000 - 5,000
Issuance of common stock for services - - 100,000 100 2,900 - 3,000
Issuance of common stock to directors - - 2,750 3 300 - 303
Series A convertible stock dividends - - - - - (23,842) (23,842)
Stock options granted with debt - - - - 166,024 - 166,024
Net loss - - - - - (1,044,145) (1,044,145)
------- ------ ----------- ------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Balance at December 31, 2003 10,000 100 26,326,460 26,327 9,232,756 (10,761,954) (1,502,771)
Issuance of common stock for cash,
net of offering costs 12,132,913 12,133 1,092,867 1,105,000
Issuance of common stock upon
exercise of common stock options 1,875,000 1,875 7,500 9,375
Issuance of common stock options for services 15,000 15,000
Issuance of common stock for services 187,500 188 14,062 14,250
Interest expense on loans in default 127,137 127,137
Debt discount on loan from officer 17,647 17,647
Issuance of common stock for interest 30,000 30 4,170 4,200
Issuance of common stock to officer for services 477,679 478 26,272 26,750
Net loss (1,748,372) (1,748,372)
------- ------ ----------- ------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Balance at December 31, 2004 10,000 100 41,029,552 41,031 10,537,411 (12,510,326) (1,931,784)
Issuance of common stock for cash,
net of offering costs 12,592,854 12,593 859,407 872,000
Issuance of common stock for conversion of debt 9,865,784 9,865 555,135 565,000
Issuance of common stock to officers and
directors 6,020,676 6,021 231,265 237,286
Issuance of common stock for services 1,034,996 1,035 75,073 76,108
Equity component of issuance of convertible debt 83,333 83,333
Issuance of common stock purchase warrants for
services 25,458 25,458
Net loss (1,745,039) (1,745,039)
------- ------ ----------- ------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Balance at December 31, 2005 10,000 $ 100 70,543,862 $70,545 $12,367,082 $(14,255,365)$(1,817,638)
------- ------ ----------- ------- ----------- ------------ -----------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
F-4
PHASE III MEDICAL, INC.
Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------
2005 2004 2003
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Cash flows from operating activities: $ (1,745,039) $ (1,748,372) $ (1,044,145)
Net loss
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash used in
operating activities:
Common shares issued and stock options granted
as payment for interest expense and for
services rendered 338,852 187,337 169,327
Depreciation 1,958 1,777 646
Amortization of debt discount 5,882 11,765 -
Series A mandatorily redeemable
convertible preferred stock dividends 47,684 47,684 23,842
Unearned revenues (35,262) (48,561) (64,632)
Deferred acquisition costs 24,776 33,885 46,053
Realized loss on note receivable - - 150,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
:
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 2,786 (3,209) 22,070
Other assets (111,753) (3,000)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses
and other current liabilities 636,120 58,041 (322,074)
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Net cash used in operating activities (833,996) (1,459,653) (1,021,913)
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of property and equipment - (3,288) (2,581)
Notes receivable - - 850,000
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing
activities - (3,288) 847,419
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds from issuance of capital stock 872,000 1,114,375 219,781
Stockholder advances - (106,000)
Proceeds from notes payable 203,000 75,000 275,000
Repayment of notes payable (30,000)
Proceeds from notes payable - related party 100,000 -
Proceeds from sale of convertible
debentures 250,000
Repayment of long-term debt (9,513) (22,595)
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 1,295,000 1,279,862 366,186
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents 461,004 (183,079) 191,692
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
year 27,868 210,947 19,255
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 488,872 $ 27,868 $ 210,947
==================== ==================== ====================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
F-5
PHASE III MEDICAL, INC.
Statements of Cash Flows - continued
Years ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------
2005 2004 2003
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW
INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest $ 92,010 $ 106,574 $ 26,483
==================== ==================== ====================
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH INVESTING
AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issuance of common stock for services
rendered $ 313,394 $ 32,027 $ 3,303
==================== ==================== ====================
Compensatory element of stock options $ 25,458 $ 127,137 $ 166,024
==================== ==================== ====================
Net accrual of dividends on Series A
preferred stock $ - $ - $ 23,842
==================== ==================== ====================
Conversion of convertible debentures $ 565,000 $ - $ -
==================== ==================== ====================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
F-6
NOTE 1 - THE COMPANY
- --------------------
Phase III Medical, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Company") was known as
Corniche Group Incorporated until it changed its name on July 24, 2003. The
Company was incorporated in Delaware on September 18, 1980 under the name
Fidelity Medical Services, Inc. From its inception through March 1995, the
Company was engaged in the development, design, assembly, marketing, and sale of
medical imaging products. As a result of a reverse merger with Corniche
Distribution Limited and its Subsidiaries ("Corniche") the Company was engaged
in the retail sale and wholesale distribution of stationery products and related
office products, including office furniture, in the United Kingdom. Effective
March 25, 1995, the Company sold its wholly-owned medical imaging products
subsidiary. On September 28, 1995 the Company changed its name to Corniche Group
Incorporated. In February 1996, the Company's United Kingdom operations were
placed in receivership by their creditors. Thereafter, through May 1998, the
Company had no activity. On March 4, 1998, the Company entered into a Stock
Purchase Agreement ("Agreement"), approved by the Company's stockholders on May
18, 1998, with certain individuals (the "Initial Purchasers") whereby the
Initial Purchasers acquired an aggregate of 765,000 shares of a newly created
Series B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share.
Thereafter the Initial Purchasers endeavored to establish for the Company new
business operations in the property and casualty specialty insurance and the
service contract markets. On September 30, 1998, the Company acquired all of the
capital stock of Stamford Insurance Company, Ltd. ("Stamford") from Warrantech
Corporation ("Warrantech") for $37,000 in cash in a transaction accounted for as
a purchase. On April 30, 2001, the Company sold Stamford for a consideration of
$372,000. During 2001, the Company recorded a loss of approximately $479,000 on
the sale of Stamford. The closing was effective May 1, 2001 and transfer of
funds was completed on July 6, 2001.
On January 7, 2002, the Company entered into a Stock Contribution Exchange
Agreement (the "Exchange Agreement") and a Supplemental Disclosure Agreement
(together with the Exchange Agreement, the "Agreements") with Strandtek
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Strandtek"), certain of
Strandtek's principal shareholders and certain non-shareholder loan holders of
Strandtek (the "StrandTek Transaction"). The Exchange Agreement was amended on
February 11, 2002. Had the transactions contemplated by the Agreements closed,
StrandTek would have become a majority owned subsidiary of the Company and the
former shareholders of StrandTek would have controlled the Company. Consummation
of the StrandTek Transaction was conditioned upon a number of closing
conditions, including the Company obtaining financing via an equity private
placement, which ultimately could not be met and, as a result, the Agreements
were formally terminated by the Company and StrandTek in June 2002.
The Company was a provider of extended warranties and service contracts via the
Internet at warrantysuperstore.com through June 30, 2002. In June 2002,
management determined, in light of continuing operating losses, to discontinue
its warranty and service contract business and to seek new business
opportunities for the Company. On February 6, 2003, the Company appointed Mark
Weinreb as a member of the Board of Directors and as its President and Chief
Executive Officer. The Company provides capital and guidance to companies, in
multiple sectors of the healthcare and life science industries, in return for a
percentage of revenues, royalty fees, licensing fees and other product sales of
the target companies. Mr. Weinreb was appointed to finalize and execute the
Company's new business plan.
On December 12, 2003, the Company signed a royalty agreement with Parallel
Solutions, Inc. "(PSI") to develop a new bioshielding platform technology for
the delivery of therapeutic proteins and small molecule drugs in order to extend
circulating half-life to improve bioavailability and dosing regimen, while
maintaining or improving pharmacologic activity. The agreement provides for PSI
to pay the Company a percentage of the revenue received from the sale of certain
specified products or licensing activity. The company provided capital and
guidance to PSI to conduct a Proof of Concept Study to improve an existing
therapeutic protein with the goal of validating the bioshielding technology for
further development and licensing the technology.
F-7
NOTE 1 - THE COMPANY - (CONTINUED)
- --------------------
The Company continues to recruit management, business development and technical
personnel, and develop its business model. Accordingly, it will be necessary for
the Company to raise new capital. There can be no assurance that any such
business plan developed by the Company will be successful, that the Company will
be able to acquire such new business or rights or raise new capital, or that the
terms of any transaction will be favorable to the Company.
The business of the Company today comprises the "run off" of its sale of
extended warranties and service contracts via the Internet and the new business
opportunity it is pursuing in the medical/bio-tech sector.
On January 19, 2006, the Company acquired all the assets of NeoStem, Inc.,
("NeoStem") a company that specializes in the collection and storage of adult
stem cells. NeoStem is a commercial autologous (donor and recipient are the
same) adult stem cell bank pioneering the pre-disease collection, processing and
storage of stem cells that donors can access for their own present and future
medical treatment. The Company's new objective is to be the leading provider of
adult stem cells for therapeutic use in the burgeoning field of regenerative
medicine, including treatment for heart disease, certain types of cancer and
other critical health problems.
At December 31, 2005, the Company had a cash balance of $488,872, deficit
working capital of $1,245,084 and a stockholders' deficit of $1,817,638. In
addition, the Company sustained losses of $1,745,039, $1,748,372 and $1,067,987
for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 respectively.
The Company's lack of liquidity combined with its history of losses raises
substantial doubt as to the ability of the Company to continue as a going
concern. The financial statements of the Company do not reflect any adjustments
relating to the doubt of its ability to continue as a going concern. There can
be no assurance that the Company will be able to sell securities and may have to
rely on its ability to borrow funds from new and or existing investors.
USE OF ESTIMATES: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain
reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from
those estimates.
CASH EQUIVALENTS: Short-term cash investments, which have a maturity of ninety
days or less when purchased, are considered cash equivalents in the consolidated
statement of cash flows.
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT-RISK: Financial instruments that potentially subject
the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of
cash. The Company places its cash accounts with high credit quality financial
institutions, which at times may be in excess of the FDIC insurance limit.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT: The cost of property and equipment is depreciated over
the estimated useful lives of the related assets of 3 to 5 years. The cost of
computer software programs are amortized over their estimated useful lives of
five years. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method. Repairs and
maintenance expenditures that do not extend original asset lives are charged to
expense as incurred.
INCOME TAXES: The Company, in accordance with SFAS 109, "Accounting for Income
Taxes", recognizes (a) the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current
year and, (b) deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax
consequences of events that have been recognized in an enterprise's financial
statement or tax returns. Comprehensive income (loss)
F-8
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS): Refers to revenue, expenses, gains and losses that
under generally accepted accounting principles are included in comprehensive
income but are excluded from net income as these amounts are recorded directly
as an adjustment to stockholders' equity. At December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
there were no such adjustments required.
PRO FORMA EFFECT OF STOCK OPTIONS: Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation No. 44 is an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25 and SFAS No.
123 which requires that effective July 1, 2000, all options issued to
non-employees after January 12, 2000 be accounted for under the rules of SFAS
No. 123.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - (CONTINUED)
- ---------------------------------------------------
Assuming the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant to be $.03 in
February 2003, $.05 in May, June and July 2003, $.18 in September 2003, $.15 in
January 2004, $.14 in March 2004, $.11 in May 2004, $.10 in September and
November 2004, $.06 in February 2005, $.05 in April and July 2005, $.08 in
September 2005 and $.06 in December 2005, the life of the options to be from
three to ten years, the expected volatility at between 15% and 200%, expected
dividends are none, and the risk-free interest rate of approximately 3%, the
Company would have recorded compensation expense of $116,146, $218,597 and
$205,760, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 as
calculated by the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average fair
value per option of options granted during 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $0.06, $0.11
and $0.06, respectively.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the
fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly
subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because
the Company's stock options have characteristics significantly different from
those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions
can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the
existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair
value of its stock options.
As such, proforma net loss and net loss per share would be as follows:
2005 2004 2003
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Net loss as reported $ (1,745,039) $ (1,748,372) $ (1,067,987)
Additional compensation (116,146) (218,597) (205,760)
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Adjusted net loss $ (1,861,185) $ (1,966,969) $ (1,273,747)
=============== ================ ===============
Net loss per share as reported $ (.04) $ (.05) $ (.05)
=============== ================ ===============
Adjusted net loss per share $ (.04) $ (.06) $ (.05)
=============== ================ ===============
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS - In December 2004, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS No. 123(R)"). SFAS No. 123(R)
establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity
exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. This statement focuses
primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee
services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that the
fair value of such equity instruments be recognized as an expense in the
historical financial statements as services are performed. Prior to SFAS No.
123(R), only certain pro forma disclosures of fair value were required. The
provisions of this statement are effective for the first interim or annual
reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005.
F-9
In June 2005, FASB issued SFAS No. 154 - Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections, which replaces APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3. This
statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principles and to
changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the
pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. When a
pronouncement includes specific transition provisions, those provisions should
be followed. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005. The Company does not believe that this statement will have a
material effect on its financial statements.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation ("FIN") 47, ACCOUNTING FOR
CONDITIONAL ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS -- AN INTERPRETATION OF FASB STATEMENT
NO. 143. FIN 47 clarifies that conditional asset retirement obligations meet the
definition of liabilities and should be recognized when incurred if their fair
values can be reasonably estimated. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 47
effective December 31, 2005. The adoption of FIN 47 had no impact on the
Company's financial position or results of operations.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, ACCOUNTING FOR CERTAIN HYBRID
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS. This Statement amends FASB Statements No. 133, ACCOUNTING
FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES, and No. 140, ACCOUNTING FOR
TRANSFERS AND SERVICING OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND EXTINGUISHMENTS OF LIABILITIES.
This Statement resolves issues addressed in Statement 133 Implementation Issue
No. D1, " Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized
Financial Assets. " SFAS No. 155 permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid
financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would
require bifurcation, clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only
strips are not subject to the requirements of Statement 133, and establishes a
requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify
interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial
instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation. It also
clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are
not embedded derivatives and amends Statement 140 to eliminate the prohibition
on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial
instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative
financial instrument. This Statement is effective for all financial instruments
acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that
begins after September 15, 2006. The Company has not yet determined the impact
of the adoption of FAS 155 on its financial statements, if any.
EARNINGS PER SHARE: Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted effect of
all common shares issued and outstanding, and is calculated by dividing net
income available to common stockholders by the weighted average shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share, which is calculated
by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average
number of common shares used in the basic earnings per share calculation plus
the number of common shares that would be issued assuming conversion of all
potentially dilutive securities outstanding, is not presented as it is
anti-dilutive in all periods presented.
ADVERTISING POLICY: All expenditures for advertising is charged against
operations as incurred.
REVENUE RECOGNITION: Stamford's reinsurance premiums are recognized on a pro
rata basis over the policy term. The deferred policy acquisition costs are the
net cost of acquiring new and renewal insurance contracts. These costs are
charged to expense in proportion to net premium revenue recognized. The
provisions for losses and loss-adjustment expenses include an amount determined
from loss reports on individual cases and an amount based on past experience for
losses incurred but not reported. Such liabilities are necessarily based on
estimates, and while management believes that the amount is adequate, the
ultimate liability may be in excess of or less than the amounts provided. The
methods for making such estimates and for establishing the resulting liability
are continually reviewed, and any adjustments are reflected in earnings
currently.
F-10
The Company had sold, via the Internet, through partnerships and directly to
consumers, extended warranty service contracts for seven major consumer
products. The Company recognizes revenue ratably over the length of the
contract. The Company purchased insurance to fully cover any losses under the
service contracts from a domestic carrier. The insurance premium and other costs
related to the sale are amortized over the life of the contract.
PURCHASE OF ROYALTY INTERESTS: The Company charges payments for the purchase of
future potential royalty interests to expense as paid and will record revenues
when royalty payments are received.
NOTE 3 - NOTES RECEIVABLE
- -------------------------
In January 2002, the Company advanced to StrandTek a loan of $1 million on an
unsecured basis, which was personally guaranteed by certain of the principal
shareholders of StrandTek and a further loan of $250,000 on February 19, 2002 on
an unsecured basis. Such loans bore interest at 7% per annum and were due on
July 31, 2002 following termination of the Agreements (as discussed in Note 1)
in June 2002. StrandTek failed to pay the notes on the due date and the Company
commenced legal proceedings against StrandTek and the guarantors to recover the
principal, accrued interest and costs of recovery. The Company ceased accruing
interest on July 31, 2002. Subsequent to July 31, 2002, the notes accrue
interest at the default rate of 12% per annum. The Company provided an allowance
for the $250,000 unsecured loan and interest of $8,103 at December 31, 2002. On
July 24, 2003 the Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement with personal
guarantors Veltmen and Buckles pursuant to which they made payments totaling
$590,640, including interest of $90,640. A similar Forbearance Agreement was
reached with personal guarantor Arnett as of July 28, 2003 pursuant to which he
paid $287,673, including interest of $37,673. A Settlement Agreement was reached
with personal guarantor Bauman as of December 23, 2003 pursuant to which he paid
$100,000 in full settlement of the judgment against him in the amount of
$291,406. The payment was received on December 30, 2003 as stated in the
agreement. These payments, totaling approximately $987,000 were paid as full
satisfaction for the outstanding amounts owed to the Company. Accordingly, the
Company recorded a realized loss on these notes of $150,000 in 2003.
NOTE 4 - ACCRUED LIABILITIES
- ----------------------------
Accrued liabilities are as follows:
December 31,
-------------------------------------
2005 2004
---------------- ----------------
Professional fees $ 173,649 $ 31,760
Interest on notes payable 4,268 11,530
Salaries and related taxes 424,950 45,368
Other 14,329 225
---------------- ----------------
$ 617,196 $ 88,883
================ ================
NOTE 5 - NOTES PAYABLE
- ----------------------
In September 2002, the Company sold to accredited investors five 60-day
promissory notes in the principal sum of $25,000 each, resulting in net proceeds
to the Company of $117,500, net of offering costs. The notes bear interest at
15% per annum payable at maturity. The notes include a default penalty pursuant
to which, if the notes are not paid on the due date, the holder shall have the
option to purchase twenty five thousand shares of the Company's common stock for
an aggregate purchase price of $125. If the non payment continues for 30 days,
then on the 30th day, and at the end of each successive 30-day period until the
F-11
note is paid in full, the holder shall have the option to purchase an additional
twenty five thousand shares of the Company's common stock for an aggregate
purchase price of $125. During the year ended December 31, 2004, 1,875,000
options granted pursuant to the default penalty were exercised resulting in net
proceeds of $9,375. Interest expense on these notes approximated $127,000 and
$166,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 respectively. (See Note
7) In September and October, 2004, these notes were repaid.
On March 17, 2003, the Company commenced a private placement offering to raise
up to $250,000 in 6-month promissory notes in increments of $5,000 bearing
interest at 15% per annum. Only selected investors which qualify as "accredited
investors" as defined in Rule 501(a) under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, were eligible to purchase these promissory notes. The Company raised
the full $250,000 through the sale of such promissory notes, resulting in net
proceeds to the Company of $225,000, net of offering costs. The notes contain a
default provision which raises the interest rate to 20% if the notes are not
paid when due. The Company issued $250,000 of these notes. As of December 31,
2005, $70,000 has been converted into 1,190,000 shares of the Company's Common
Stock and $80,000 of which $15,000 has been repaid in January 2006 and the
remainder bears interest at 20% and the due date has been extended to September
30, 2006.
On August 26, 2003, the Company borrowed $25,000 from a then consultant to the
Company. In October 2004, this note was combined with a note of $50,000
previously held by an unrelated third party. This new note accrues interest at
8% and was due on August 31, 2005 together with the accrued interest. In
November 30, 2005, this note was converted into 1,275,000 shares of the
Company's Common Stock. All interest payments have been accrued.
In February 2004, the Company commenced a sale of 30 day 20% notes in the amount
of $125,000 to three accredited investors to fund current operations. It was
anticipated that these notes would be repaid from the proceeds of the January
2004 amended equity private placement. Two of these notes have a default
provision that if they are not paid within 30 days, there is an additional
interest payment of $250 per $25,000 of principal outstanding for each 30 day
period or part thereof. As of December 31, 2005, these notes have been repaid.
All interest payments have been paid timely. In May 2004, the Company sold an
additional 30 day 20% note in the amount of $40,000 to an accredited investor to
fund current operations. This note plus interest has been repaid. In July 2004,
the Company sold a five month 20% note in the amount of $25,000 and two six
month 20% notes totaling $80,000 to three accredited investors to fund current
operations. As of December 31, 2005, $25,000 has been repaid and the balance has
been converted into 1,360,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock. All interest
payments have been paid timely. In August 2004, the Company sold additional 30
day 20% notes in the amount of $55,000 to two accredited investors to fund
current operations. As of December 31, 2005, $25,000 of these notes remains
unpaid. All interest payments have been paid timely. In December 2004, the
Company sold four notes to four accredited investors totaling $100,000 with
interest rates that range from 8% to 20%. As of December 31, 2005, $5,000 has
been repaid, $85,000 converted into 1,445,000 shares of the Company's Common
Stock and $10,000 of these notes remain unpaid. The $10,000 note was repaid in
January 2006. All interest payments have been made timely.
In August 2004, the Company sold a six month 20% convertible note in the amount
of $100,000 to its Chief Operating Officer ("COO"). Upon maturity, the Company
and the COO have agreed to convert the principal amount of the new note into
shares of the Company's common stock at 85% of the average price as quoted on
the NASD Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board for the five days prior to the maturity
date of the note. Approximately $18,000 of the total debt was attributed to the
intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature. This amount was recorded
as an equity component. The remaining balance of approximately $82,000 was
recorded as debt. For the year ended December 31, 2004 the amortization of debt
discount approximated $12,000. All interest is paid monthly in arrears. In
February 2005, this note was converted into 1,960,784 shares of the Company's
Common Stock. All interest payments have been paid timely. For the year ended
December 31, 2005 the amortization of debt discount approximated $6,000.
F-12
In January 2005, the Company sold a six month 20% note in the amount of $25,000
to an accredited investor to fund current operations. This note was converted
into 425,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock. All interest payments have
been made. In February 2005, the Company sold a six month 20% note in the amount
of $10,000 to an accredited investor to fund current operations. This note was
converted into 170,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock. All interest
payments have been made. In March 2005, the Company sold a 30 day 8% note in the
amount of $17,000 to the President and CEO of the Company. Additionally, the
Company sold a one year 15% note in the amount of $20,000, which was
subsequently converted into 340,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock, to an
accredited investor. All interest payments on these notes are current. The note
in the amount of $17,000 was unpaid as of December 31, 2005, however, it was
repaid in January 2006.
In April 2005, the Company sold a one year 15% note in the amount of $100,000 to
its Executive Vice President and General Counsel. The note contains certain
rights and obligations regarding its conversion into shares of the Company's
Common Stock. In November 2005, this note was converted into 1,700,000 shares of
the Company's Common Stock. All interest payments on this note have been made.
In August 2005, the Company sold an 8% note in the amount of $10,000 to its
President and CEO, an accredited investor which is due on demand. As of December
31, 2005, this note remains unpaid, however it was repaid in January 2006.
In September 2005, Company sold two 8% notes in the amounts of $6,000 and
$15,000 to its President and CEO, an accredited investor which are due on
demand. As of December 31, 2005, these notes remain unpaid, however, it was
repaid in January 2006.
On December 30, 2005, the Company sold $250,000 of convertible nine month
Promissory Notes which bear 9% simple interest with net proceeds to the Company
of $220,000. In addition, these Promissory Notes have 416,666 detachable
warrants for each $25,000 of debt, which entitle the holder to purchase one
share of the Company's Common Stock at a price of $.12 per share. The warrants
are exercisable for a period of three years from the date of the Promissory
Note. The Promissory Notes convert to the Company's Common Stock at $.06 per
share. The Promissory Notes are convertible at anytime into shares of Common
Stock at the option of the Company subsequent to the shares underlying the
Promissory Notes and the shares underlying the warrants registration if the
closing price of the Common Stock has been at least $.18 for a period of at
least 10 consecutive days prior to the date on which notice of conversion is
sent by the Company to the holders of the Promissory Notes. The Company recorded
a debt discount associated with the conversion feature in the amount of $83,333.
The Company recorded an expense of $2,573 associated with the warrants as their
fair value using the Black Scholes method.
A summary of notes payable and convertible debentures is as follows:
JANUARY 1, REPAYMENTS Less: Debt
2005 PROCEEDS /CONVERSIONS DISCOUNTS DECEMBER 31, 2005
---- -------- ------------ --------- -----------------
March 2003 Notes $ 170,000 $ - $ (90,000) $ - $ 80,000
Consultant Note 75,000 (75,000) -
2004 Notes 230,000 (175,000) 55,000
2005 Notes - 203,000 (155,000) 48,000
Related Party Note 94,118 (94,118) -
Convertible
Debentures 250,000 (83,333) 166,667
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $569,118 $453,000 $ (589,118) $ (83,333) $ 349,667
===============================================================================
F-13
NOTE 6 - SERIES A MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
In connection with the settlement of securities class action litigation in 1994,
the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of Series A $0.07 Convertible Preferred
Stock (the "Series A Preferred Stock") with an aggregate value of $1,000,000.
The following summarizes the terms of Series A Preferred Stock as more fully set
forth in the Certificate of Designation. The Series A Preferred Stock has a
liquidation value of $1 per share, is non-voting and convertible into common
stock of the Company at a price of $5.20 per share. Holders of Series A
Preferred Stock are entitled to receive cumulative cash dividends of $0.07 per
share, per year, payable semi-annually. The Series A Preferred Stock is callable
by the Company at a price of $1.05 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends.
In addition, if the closing price of the Company's common stock exceeds $13.80
per share for a period of 20 consecutive trade days, the Series A Preferred
Stock is callable by the Company at a price equal to $0.01 per share, plus
accrued and unpaid dividends.
The Certificate of Designation for the Series A Preferred Stock also states that
at any time after December 1, 1999 the holders of the Series A Preferred Stocks
may require the Company to redeem their shares of Series A Preferred Stock (if
there are funds with which the Company may do so) at a price of $1.00 per share.
Notwithstanding any of the foregoing redemption provisions, if any dividends on
the Series A Preferred Stock are past due, no shares of Series A Preferred Stock
may be redeemed by the Company unless all outstanding shares of Series A
Preferred Stock are simultaneously redeemed.
At December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, 681,174 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
were outstanding, and accrued dividends on these outstanding shares were
$528,564, $480,880, and $433,196 respectively.
On January 29, 2002, notice was given that, pursuant to the Company's Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, the Company called for redemption on
the date of closing the StrandTek Transaction, all shares of Series A Preferred
Stock outstanding on that date at a redemption price of $1.05, plus accrued and
unpaid dividends of approximately $0.47 per share. The redemption, among other
financial, legal and business conditions, was a condition of closing the
StrandTek Transaction. Similarly, the redemption was subject to closing the
StrandTek Transaction. Upon termination of the StrandTek Transaction, the
Company rescinded the notice of redemption.
NOTE 7 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
- -----------------------------
(a) SERIES B CONVERTIBLE REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK:
The total authorized shares of Series B Convertible Redeemable
Preferred Stock is 825,000. The following summarizes the terms of the
Series B Stock whose terms are more fully set forth in the Certificate
of Designation. The Series B Stock carries a zero coupon and each share
of the Series B Stock is convertible into ten shares of the Company's
common stock. The holder of a share of the Series B Stock is entitled
to ten times any dividends paid on the common stock and such stock has
ten votes per share and votes as one class with the common stock.
The holder of any share of Series B Convertible Redeemable Preferred
Stock has the right, at such holder's option (but not if such share is
called for redemption), exercisable after September 30, 2000, to
convert such share into ten (10) fully paid and non-assessable shares
of common stock (the "Conversion Rate"). The Conversion Rate is subject
to adjustment as stipulated in the Agreement. Upon liquidation, the
Series B Stock would be junior to the Company's Series A Preferred
Stock and would share ratably with the common stock with respect to
liquidating distributions.
F-14
During the year ended December 31, 2000, holders of 805,000 shares of
the Series B Preferred Stock converted their shares into 8,050,000
shares of the Company's common stock. During the year ended December
31, 2002, the holders of 10,000 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock
converted their shares into 100,000 shares of the Company's common
stock.
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, 10,000 Series B Preferred Shares were
issued and outstanding. The Company's right to repurchase or redeem
shares of Series B Stock was eliminated in fiscal 1999 pursuant to the
terms of the Agreement and the Certificate of Designation.
(b) COMMON STOCK:
At the July 2005 annual meeting, the stockholders approved an amendment
increasing the authorized common stock to 500 million shares from 250
million shares.
In 2003, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its common stock,
resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $5,000 and 1,875,000 shares
of its common stock in 2004, resulting in net proceeds to the Company
of $9,375 as a result of the exercise of stock options granted pursuant
to the default provisions of the 60 day promissory notes discussed in
Note 5.
On February 6, 2003, the Company entered into a deferment agreement
with three major creditors pursuant to which liabilities of
approximately $523,887 in the aggregate, were deferred, subject to the
success of the Company's debt and equity financing efforts. In
addition, in consideration for the deferral, the Company agreed to
issue 100,000 restricted shares of the Company's common stock, whose
fair value was $3,000. The deferred creditors were paid in full, during
2003 from the recoveries against the StrandTek (see Note 3) personal
guarantors.
On September 22, 2003 the Company commenced an equity private placement
to raise up to $4 million through the sale of up to 40 million shares
of its Common Stock in increments of $5,000 or 50,000 shares. Only
selected investors which qualify as "accredited investors" as defined
in Rule 501(a) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, were
eligible to purchase these shares. The placement closed on December 31,
2003 upon the sale of 2,825,000 shares, resulting in proceeds to the
Company of $214,781, net of offering costs of $67,719. The Company
retained Robert M. Cohen & Company as placement agent, on a best
efforts basis, for the offering. The Company agreed to pay the
placement agent an amount equal to 10% of the proceeds of the offering
as commissions for the placement agents' services in addition to
reimbursement of the placement agents' expenses (by way of a 3%
non-accountable expense allowance) and indemnification against
customary liabilities.
In January 2004, the Company amended its equity private placement.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company sold 12,132,913
common shares resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $1,105,000.
Of these shares, 7,282,913 were purchased by Robert Aholt, Jr., Chief
Operating Officer of the Company in exchange for $650,000. Such shares
have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be
offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an
applicable exemption of registration requirements.
In March 2004, the Company issued 30,000 shares of its common stock
whose fair value was $4,200 to two note holders as additional interest.
In each of the months of August through December 2004, the Company
issued 37,500 shares for a total of 187,500 shares of its common stock
to its investor relations firms for services. The fair value of these
shares was $14,250 which was charged to operations.
F-15
In December 2004, the Company issued 477,679 shares of its common stock
to its Chief Operating Officer as compensation as stated in his
employment contract. The fair value of these shares was $26,750 which
was charged to operations.
In February 2005, the $100,000 convertible note sold to the Company's
former COO was converted into 1,960,784 shares of the Company's Common
Stock.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2005, the Company issued
174,996 shares of its common stock to its investor relations firms for
services. The fair value of these shares was $10,208 which was charged
to operations.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2005, the Company issued
3,080,676 shares of its common stock to its officers, directors and
employees for services in lieu of salary. The fair value of these
shares was $119,686 which was charged to operations.
In 2005, the Company issued 12,592,854 shares of its Common Stock to
accredited investors resulting in net proceeds to the Company of
$872,000.
In July 2005, the Company granted 3,000,000 shares of its Common Stock
to its President and CEO. These shares vest 1,000,000 immediately and
1,000,000 on each of the next two anniversary dates. The fair value of
these shares was $120,000 which was charged to expense.
In September 2005, the Company granted 500,000 shares of its Common
Stock to an Advisory Board member. The fair value of these shares was
$40,000 which was charged to expense.
In October 2005, the Company issued 50,000 shares to the Hospital for
Joint Diseases in exchange for advertising in an event journal. The
fair value of these shares was $3,500 which was charged to expense.
On November 30, 2005, $445,000 of debt was converted into the Company's
Common Stock at 17 shares for each one dollar of debt resulting in
7,565,000 shares being issued. On December 30, 2005, an additional
$20,000 of debt was converted into 340,000 shares of the Company's
Common Stock.
On December 30, 2005, the Company issued 250,000 shares of its Common
Stock to Westpark Capital, Inc. as additional compensation for the sale
of the convertible debentures. The fair value of these shares was
$20,000 which was charged to expense.
(c) WARRANTS:
The Company has issued common stock purchase warrants from time to time
to investors in private placements, certain vendors, underwriters, and
directors and officers of the Company.
In connection with the September 2003 equity private placement, the
Company issued a 5 year warrant to purchase 282,500 shares of its
Common Stock at an exercise price of $.12 per share to its retained
placement agent, Robert M. Cohen & Company. The warrant contains
"piggyback registration rights. The fair value of these warrants was
$13,500 at December 31, 2003.
In each of the months of August 2004 through January 2005, the Company
issued 25,000 warrants for a total of 150,000 warrants which entitles
the holder to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $.05.
These warrants expire in three years from date of issue and were issued
the Company's investor relations firm. The fair value of these warrants
was $874 in 2005 and $3,250 in 2004.
F-16
Warrants to purchase 240,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock were
issued in September 2005, to Dr. Robin Smith for her position as
Chairperson of the Advisory Board. The warrants vest 20,000 per month
for twelve months. Each warrant entitles Dr. Smith to purchase one
share of common stock at a price of $.08. These warrants expire three
years from the date of issue. The fair value of these warrants was
$3,196 in 2005 and $6,392 will be charged to operations in 2006.
In December 2005, the Company issued 4,166,660 warrants to the holders
of the 9% convertible debt and 416,666 warrants to the placement agent
as additional compensation. These warrants entitle the holder to
purchase one share of common stock at a price of $.12 and expire three
years from the date of issue. The Company recorded an expense of $2,573
associated with the warrants as their fair value using the Black
Scholes method.
A total of 5,255,826 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance
upon exercise of outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2005 at prices
ranging from $.05 to $.16 and expiring through December 2008. No
warrants were exercised during any of the periods presented.
(d) STOCK OPTION PLANS:
(i) The 1998 Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan provides for the
granting of options to purchase shares of the Company's common stock to
employees. Under the 1998 Plan, the maximum aggregate number of shares
that may be issued under options is 300,000 shares of common stock. The
aggregate fair market value (determined at the time the option is
granted) of the shares for which incentive stock options are
exercisable for the first time under the terms of the 1998 Plan by any
eligible employee during any calendar year cannot exceed $100,000.
Options are exercisable at the fair market value of the common stock on
the date of grant and have five-year terms. The exercise price of each
option is 100% of the fair market value of the underlying stock on the
date the options are granted and are exercisable for a period of ten
years, except that no option will be granted to any employee who, at
the time the option is granted, owns stock possessing more than 10% of
the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company
or any subsidiary unless (a) at the time the options are granted, the
option exercise price is at least 110% of the fair market value of the
shares of common stock subject to the options and (b) the option by its
terms is not exercisable after the expiration of five years from the
date such option is granted. The Board of Directors' Compensation
Committee administers the 1998 Plan. The 1998 Employee Incentive Stock
Option Plan was superceded by the 2003 Equity Participation Plan in
February 2003. (see below).
Under the 1998 plan outstanding options expire 90 days after
termination of the holder's status as employee or director. All options
were granted at an exercise price equal to the fair value of the common
stock at the grant date. Therefore, in accordance with the provisions
of APB Opinion No. 25 related to fixed stock options, no compensation
expense is recognized with respect to options granted or exercised.
Under the alternative fair-value based method defined in SFAS No. 123,
the fair value of all fixed stock options on the grant date would be
recognized as expense over the vesting period.
(ii) At the 2003 annual meeting, the stockholders approved the 2003
Equity Participation Plan. The Company has reserved 50,000,000 shares
of common stock for the grant of incentive stock options and
non-statutory stock options to employees and non-employee directors,
consultants and advisors. Pursuant to such plan the Company entered
into a Stock Option Agreement with Mr. Weinreb (the "Initial Option
Agreement"). Under the Initial Option Agreement, the Company granted
Mr. Weinreb the right and option, exercisable for 10 years, to purchase
up to 2,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise
price of $0.03 per share.
F-17
Additionally, in the event that the closing price of the Company's
common stock equals or exceeds $0.50 per share for any five consecutive
trading days during the term of the employment agreement (whether
during the initial term or an annual extension), the Company has agreed
to grant Mr. Weinreb, on the day immediately following the end of the
five day period, an option to purchase an additional 2,500,000 shares
of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share,
pursuant to the 2003 Equity Participation Plan.
Mr. Weinreb has agreed that he will not sell any shares of the
Company's common stock obtained upon exercise of the Initial Option
Agreement or Additional Option Agreement prior to the first anniversary
of the date of the employment agreement.
In April 2005, the Company granted an option to purchase 150,000 shares
of its Common Stock at an exercise price of $.10 to Catherine Vaczy,
its Executive Vice President and General Counsel. These options vest
50,000 per year on each anniversary of the grant date.
In July 2005, the Company granted an option to purchase 750,000 shares
of its Common Stock at an exercise price of $.06 to Catherine Vaczy,
its Executive Vice President and General Counsel. These options vest
375,000 per year on each anniversary of the grant date.
In July 2005, the Company granted an option to purchase 4,000,000
shares of its Common Stock at an exercise price of $.06 to Mark
Weinreb, its President and CEO. These options vest 2,000,000
immediately and 1,000,000 per year on each anniversary of the grant
date.
In July 2005, the Company granted an option to purchase 1,500,000
shares of its Common Stock at an exercise price of $.06 to Robert
Aholt, its former COO. These options vest 1,000,000 immediately and
250,000 per year on each anniversary of the grant date.
Additionally, the Company has granted options to purchase 11,200,000
shares in 2005, 2,985,000 shares in 2004 and 3,700,000 shares in 2003
of Common Stock at exercise prices ranging from $.03 to $.18 to members
of its board of directors, employees, consultants and its advisory
board. All options were granted at an exercise price more than or equal
to the fair value of the common stock at the date of grant.
Stock option activity under the 2003 Equity Participation Plan is as
follows:
Range of Weighted Average
Number of Shares (1) Exercise Exercise Price
Price
--------------------- -------------- --------------------
Balance at December 31, 2002 - - -
Granted 3,700,000 $.03 - $.18 $.05
Exercised - - -
Expired - - -
Cancelled - - -
--------------------- -------------- --------------------
Balance at December 31, 2003 3,700,000 $.03 - $.18 $.05
Granted 2,985,000 $.10 - $.15 $.13
Exercised - - -
Expired - - -
Cancelled - - -
--------------------- -------------- --------------------
Balance at December 31, 2004 6,685,000 $.03 - $.18 $.08
Granted 11,200,000 $.05 - $.10 $.06
Exercised - - -
Expired - - -
Cancelled - - -
--------------------- -------------- --------------------
Balance at December 31, 2005 17,885,000 $.03 - $.18 $.07
===================== ============== ====================
(1) All options are exercisable for a period of ten years.
Options exercisable at December 31, 2003 - 3,700,000 at a weighted average exercise price of $.05
Options exercisable at December 31, 2004 - 6,185,000 at a weighted average exercise price of $.07
Options exercisable at December 31, 2005 - 12,085,000 at a weighted average exercise price of $.07
F-18
STOCK OPTION PLANS: - (CONTINUED)
Number Outstanding Weighted Average Remaining Number Exercisable
EXERCISE PRICE DECEMBER 31, 2005 CONTRACTUAL LIFE (YEARS) DECEMBER 31, 2005
-------------- ----------------- ------------------------ -----------------
$.03 2,500,000 7.10 2,500,000
$.05 950,000 7.55 950,000
$.06 10,750,000 9.57 5,300,000
$.07 200,000 9.09 -
$.10 1,575,000 8.81 1,425,000
$.11 200,000 8.42 200,000
$.14 300,000 8.17 300,000
$.15 1,110,000 8.01 1,110,000
$.18 300,000 7.70 300,000
------- -------
17,885,000 12,085,000
========== ==========
NOTE 8 - INCOME TAXES
- ---------------------
Deferred tax assets consisted of the following as of December 31:
2005 2004
-------------------- --------------------
Net operating loss carryforwards $ 3,807,000 $ 3,247,000
Depreciation and amortization - 1,000
,000
Capital loss carryforward - 149,000
Deferred revenue 9,000 21,000
Deferred legal and other fees 87,000 51,000
-------------------- --------------------
Net deferred tax assets 3,903,000 3,469,000
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance (3,903,000) (3,469,000)
-------------------- --------------------
$ - $ -
==================== ====================
The provision for income taxes is different than the amount computed using the
applicable statutory federal income tax rate with the difference for each year
summarized below:
2005 2004 2003
------------------ ------------------ -----------------
Federal tax benefit at statutory rate (34.0%) (34.0%) (34.0%)
Change in valuation allowance 34.0% 34.0% 34.0%
------------------ ------------------ -----------------
Provision for income taxes 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
================== ================== =================
The Tax Reform Act of 1986 enacted a complex set of rules limiting the
utilization of net operating loss carryforwards to offset future taxable income
following a corporate ownership change. The Company's ability to utilize its NOL
carryforwards is limited following a change in ownership in excess of fifty
percentage points during any three-year period.
F-19
Upon receipt of the proceeds from the last foreign purchasers of the Company's
common stock in January 2000, common stock ownership changed in excess of 50%
during the three-year period then ended. At December 31, 2005, the Company had
net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $11,196,000. Included in the
net operating loss carryforward is approximately $2,121,000 that has been
limited by the ownership change. The tax loss carryforwards expire at various
dates through 2025. The Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against
its net deferred tax asset because of the uncertainty that the utilization of
the net operating loss and deferred revenue and fees will be realized.
NOTE 9 - SEGMENT INFORMATION
- ----------------------------
Until April 30, 2001, the Company operated in two segments; as a reinsuror
and as a seller of extended warranty service contracts through the Internet. The
reinsurance segment has been discontinued with the sale of Stamford (see Note
1), and the Company's remaining revenues are derived from the run-off of its
sale of extended warranties and service contracts via the Internet.
Additionally, the Company is currently establishing a new business in the
medical, bio-tech sector. The Company's operations are conducted entirely in the
U.S. Although the Company has not realized any revenue from its purchase of
royalty revenue interests, the Company will be operating in two segments until
the "run-off" is completed. On September 13, 2004, ("Commencement Date") the
Company entered into a letter agreement (the "Letter Agreement") with Mr. Robert
Aholt Jr. pursuant to which the Company appointed Mr. Aholt as its Chief
Operating Officer. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Letter Agreement,
the term of Mr. Aholt's employment in such capacity will be for a period of
three (3) years from the Commencement Date (the "Term").
In consideration for Mr. Aholt's services under the Letter Agreement, Mr. Aholt
will be entitled to receive a monthly salary of $4,000 during the first year of
the Term, $5,000 during the second year of the Term, and $6,000 during the third
year of the Term. In further consideration for Mr. Aholt's services under the
Letter Agreement, on January 1, 2005 and on the first day of each calendar
quarter thereafter during the Term, Mr. Aholt will be entitled to receive shares
of Common Stock with a "Dollar Value" of $26,750, $27,625 and $28,888,
respectively, during the first, second and third years of the Term. The per
share price (the "Price") of each share granted to determine the Dollar Value
will be the average closing price of one share of Common Stock on the Bulletin
Board (or other similar exchange or association on which the Common Stock is
then listed or quoted) for the five (5) consecutive trading days immediately
preceding the date of grant of such shares; provided, however, that if the
Common Stock is not then listed or quoted on an exchange or association, the
Price will be the fair market value of one share of Common Stock as of the date
of grant as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Company.
The number of shares of Common Stock for each quarterly grant will be equal to
the quotient of the Dollar Value divided by the Price. The shares granted will
be subject to a one year lockup as of the date of each grant. On each of January
1, 2005, April 1, 2005, July 1, 2005 and October 1. 2005 Mr. Aholt was issued
477,679, 800,898, 668,750 and 461,206 respectively for a total of 2,408,533
shares pursuant to the terms of his agreement.
In the event Mr. Aholt's employment is terminated prior to the end of the Term
for any reason, earned but unpaid cash compensation and unreimbursed expenses
due as of the date of such termination will be payable in full. In addition, in
the event Mr. Aholt's employment is terminated prior to the end of the Term for
any reason other than by the Company with cause, Mr. Aholt or his executor of
his last will or the duly authorized administrator of his estate, as applicable,
will be entitled (i) to receive severance payments equal to one year's salary,
paid at the same level and timing of salary as Mr. Aholt is then receiving and
(ii) to receive, during the one (1) year period following the date of such
termination, the stock grants that Mr. Aholt would have been entitled to receive
had his employment not been terminated prior to the end of the Term; provided,
however, that in the event such termination is by the Company without cause or
is upon Mr. Aholt's resignation for good reason, such severance payment and
grant shall be subject to Mr. Aholt's execution and delivery to the Company of a
release of all claims against the Company.
F-20
On August 12, 2004 ("Commencement Date") the Company and Dr. Wayne A. Marasco, a
Company Director, entered into a Letter Agreement appointing Dr. Marasco as the
Company's Senior Scientific Advisor. Dr. Marasco will be responsible for
assisting the Company in reviewing and evaluating business, scientific and
medical opportunities, and for other discussions and meetings that may arise
during the normal course of the Company conducting business. For his services,
during a three year period ("Term"), Dr. Marasco shall be entitled to annual
cash compensation of $84,000 with increases each year of the Term and an
additional cash compensation based on a percentage of collected revenues derived
from the Company's royalty or revenue sharing agreements. Although the annual
cash compensation and additional cash compensation stated above shall begin to
accrue as of the Commencement Date, Dr. Marasco will not be entitled to receive
any such amounts until the Company raises $1,500,000 in additional equity
financing after the Commencement Date. In addition, Dr. Marasco was granted an
option, fully vested, to purchase 675,000 shares of the Company's common stock
at an exercise price of $.10 cents per share. The shares will be subject to a
one year lockup as of the date of grant. The exercise period will be ten years,
and the grant will otherwise be in accordance with the Company's 2003 Equity
Participation Plan and Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant Agreement.
NOTE 11 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
- ---------------------------------------
On February 6, 2003, Mr. Weinreb was appointed President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company and has entered into an employment agreement with Mr.
Weinreb. The employment agreement has an initial term of three years, with
automatic annual extensions unless terminated by the Company or Mr. Weinreb at
least 90 days prior to an applicable anniversary date. The Company has agreed to
pay Mr. Weinreb an annual salary of $180,000 for the initial year of the term,
$198,000 for the second year of the term, and $217,800 for the third year of the
term. In addition, he is entitled to an annual bonus in the amount of $20,000
for the initial year in the event, and concurrently on the date, that the
Company has received debt and/or equity financing in the aggregate amount of at
least $1,000,000 since the beginning of his service, and $20,000 for each
subsequent year of the term, without condition.
In addition, the Company, pursuant to its 2003 EPP, entered into a Stock Option
Agreement with Mr. Weinreb (the "Initial Option Agreement"). Under the Initial
Option Agreement, the Company granted Mr. Weinreb the right and option,
exercisable for 10 years, to purchase up to 2,500,000 shares of the Company's
common stock at an exercise price of $0.03 per share and otherwise upon the
terms set forth in the Initial Option Agreement. In addition, in the event that
the closing price of the Company's common stock equals or exceeds $0.50 per
share for any five consecutive trading days during the term of the employment
agreement (whether during the initial term or an annual extension), the Company
has agreed to grant to Mr. Weinreb, on the day immediately following the end of
the five day period, an option for the purchase of an additional 2,500,000
shares of the Company's common stock for an exercise price of $0.50 per share,
pursuant to the 2003 Equity Participation Plan and a Stock Option Agreement to
be entered into between the Company and Mr. Weinreb containing substantially the
same terms as the Initial Option Agreement, except for the exercise price and
that the option would be treated as an "incentive stock option" for tax purposes
only to the maximum extent permitted by law (the "Additional Option Agreement").
The Company agreed to promptly file with the Securities and Exchange Commission
a Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement") pursuant to
which the issuance of the shares covered by the 2003 Equity Participation Plan,
as well as the resale of the common stock issuable upon exercise of the Initial
Option Agreement, are registered, which has been filed. Additionally, the
Company has agreed, following any grant under the Additional Option Agreement,
to promptly file a post-effective amendment to the Registration Statement
pursuant to which the common stock issuable upon exercise thereof shall be
registered for resale. Mr. Weinreb has agreed that he will not resell publicly
any shares of the Company's common stock obtained upon exercise of any Initial
Agreement or the Additional Option Agreement prior to the first anniversary of
the date of the employment agreement.
F-21
On April 25, 2005, the Company appointment of Catherine M. Vaczy, as its
Executive Vice President and General Counsel, effective as of April 20, 2005
(the "Commencement Date"). On the Commencement Date, the Company entered into a
letter agreement (the "Letter Agreement") with Ms. Vaczy, pursuant to which the
Company appointed Ms. Vaczy as its Executive Vice President and General Counsel.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Letter Agreement, the term of Ms.
Vaczy's employment in such capacity will be for a period of three (3) years from
the Commencement Date (the "Term").
In consideration for Ms. Vaczy's services under the Letter Agreement, Ms. Vaczy
will be entitled to receive an annual salary of $155,000 during the first year
of the Term, a minimum annual salary of $170,500 during the second year of the
Term, and a minimum annual salary of $187,550 during the third year of the Term.
Ms. Vaczy and the Company have agreed that from the Commencement Date until the
90th day thereafter (the "Initial 90 Day Period"), Ms. Vaczy's salary will be
paid to her at a rate of 50% of the annual rate and accrue as to the remainder.
At the end of the Initial 90 Day Period, and at the end of each additional 90
day period thereafter, whether to continue to accrue salary at this rate and
provision for payment of accrued amounts will be discussed in good faith.
Payment of accrued salary may be made in cash, or, upon mutual agreement, shares
of common stock. Any shares of common stock issued in payment of accrued salary
shall have a per share price equal to the average closing price of one share of
common stock on the Bulletin Board (or other similar exchange or association on
which the common stock is then listed or quoted) for the five (5) consecutive
trading days immediately preceding the date of issue of such shares; provided,
however, that if the common stock is not then quoted on the Bulletin Board or
otherwise listed or quoted on an exchange or association, the price shall be the
fair market value of one share of common stock as of the date of issue as
determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Company. The number of
shares of common stock for any issuance in payment of accrued salary shall be
equal to the quotient of the amount of the accrued salary divided by the price.
The shares issued will be subject to a one-year lock up as of the date of each
grant and shall be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission on a
Registration Statement on Form S-8.
In the event Ms. Vaczy's employment is terminated prior to the end of the Term
for any reason, earned but unpaid cash compensation and unreimbursed expenses
due as of the date of such termination will be payable in full. In addition, in
the event Ms. Vaczy's employment is terminated prior to the end of the Term for
any reason other than by the Company with cause or Ms. Vaczy without good
reason, Ms. Vaczy or her executor of her last will or the duly authorized
administrator of her estate, as applicable, will be entitled in the event the
employment termination date is after April 20, 2006, to receive severance
payments equal to Ms. Vaczy's then one year's salary, paid in accordance with
the Company's standard payroll practices for executives of the Company and (ii)
in the event the employment termination date is before April 20, 2006 but after
October 20, 2005, to receive severance payments equal to one-sixth of Ms.
Vaczy's then one year's salary, paid in accordance with the Company's standard
payroll practices for executives of the Company. In addition, in the event Ms.
Vaczy's employment is terminated prior to the end of the Term by the Company
without Cause or by Ms. Vaczy for good reason, the Option (as defined below)
shall vest and become immediately exercisable in its entirety and remain
exercisable in accordance with its terms. No other payments shall be made, nor
benefits provided, by the Company in connection with the termination of
employment prior to the end of the Term, except as otherwise required by law.
On May 4, 2005, the Board voted to amend the Company's agreements with each of
Mr. Weinreb, Mr. Aholt and Dr. Marasco, as described below, subject to approval
of the Stockholders. On July 12, 2005, the Stockholders approved these
amendments.
Mr. Weinreb's employment agreement was amended to (a) extend the expiration date
thereof from February 2006 to December 2008; (b) change Mr. Weinreb's annual
base salary of $217,800 (with an increase of 10% per annum) to an annual base
salary of $250,000 (with no increase per annum); (c) grant Mr. Weinreb 3,000,000
shares of Common stock, 1,000,000 shares of which shall vest on each of the date
of grant and the first and second anniversaries of the date of grant; (d) amend
the severance provision of the existing employment agreement to provide that in
the event of termination without cause (subject to certain exceptions), Mr.
Weinreb will be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to his then base
salary and automobile allowance for a period of one year; (e) commencing in
F-22
August 2006, increase Mr. Weinreb's annual bonus from $20,000 to $25,000; (f) in
August 2005, pay Mr. Weinreb $15,000 to cover costs incurred by him on behalf of
the Company; and (g) in 2006, provide for the reimbursement of all premiums in
an annual aggregate amount of up to $18,000 payable by Mr. Weinreb for life and
long term care insurance covering each year during the remainder of the term of
his employment.
Mr. Aholt's employment agreement with the Company was amended to (a) replace the
provision of Mr. Aholt's existing employment agreement pursuant to which he is
compensated in shares of common stock with a provision pursuant to which he will
be compensated solely in cash, effective as of September 30, 2005; (b) replace
the provision of Mr. Aholt's existing employment agreement pursuant to which his
compensation accrues on a monthly and/or quarterly basis with a provision
pursuant to which his compensation will be paid in accordance with the Company's
normal payroll practices, effective as of September 30, 2005; and (c) provide
for a minimum annual bonus of $12,000, payable in January of each year during
the term of his employment, commencing in January 2006. As of May 9, 2005, Mr.
Aholt beneficially owned approximately 23.1% of the then outstanding shares of
common stock (excluding the Options to purchase 1,500,000 shares of Common stock
granted to Mr. Aholt by the Board of Directors, subject to approval of the
Stockholders, as discussed above).
Dr. Marasco's letter agreement with the Company was amended to (a) extend the
term of the letter agreement from August 2007 to August 2008; (b) provide for an
annual salary of $110,000, $125,000 and $150,000 for the years ended August
2006, 2007 and 2008, payable in each such year during the term; (c) provide for
a minimum annual bonus of $12,000, payable in January of each year during the
term, commencing in January 2006; (d) eliminate Dr. Marasco's right under his
existing letter agreement to receive 5% of all collected revenues derived from
the Company's royalty or other revenue sharing agreements (which right is
subject to the limitation that the amount of such additional cash compensation
and Dr. Marasco's annual salary do not exceed, in the aggregate, $200,000 per
year); and (e) permit Dr. Marasco to begin receiving all accrued but unpaid cash
compensation under his letter agreement upon the Company's consummation of any
financing, whether equity or otherwise, pursuant to which the Company raises
$1,500,000.
On February 21, 2003 the Company began leasing office space in Melville, New
York at an original annual rental of $18,000. The lease has been renewed through
March 2007 with an annual rental of approximately $22,800. Rent expense
approximated $28,900, $24,900 and $13,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively.
On April 22, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with an advisor in
connection with its amended private placement to provide assistance in finding
qualified investors. The agreement calls for the payment of 10% of the funds
raised by the Company as a direct result of introductions made by the advisor.
In addition, the Company is obligated to pay a 2% non-accountable expense
allowance on all funds received that are subject to the 10% payment. For the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company paid a total of $0 and
$21,000 respectively under this agreement.
On March 20, 2004, the Company entered into a consulting agreement which will
provide the Company with advice as to business development possibilities for the
services and technology of NeoStem Inc. The agreement provides for the issuance
of options to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an
exercise price of $.10 per share. This option is immediately vested and expires
ten years from the date of issue. The agreement also provides for the payment of
$2,500 per month for each month after the Company has received capital
contributions of $1,000,000 from the date of the agreement. If certain
performance levels are met, the Company is obligated to issue an additional
option to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company's common stock for an exercise
price of $.10 per share.
On December 12, 2003, the Company signed a royalty agreement with Parallel
Solutions, Inc. "(PSI") to develop a new bioshielding platform technology for
the delivery of therapeutic proteins and small molecule drugs in order to extend
circulating half-life to improve bioavailability and dosing regimen, while
F-23
maintaining or improving pharmacologic activity. The agreement provides for PSI
to pay the Company a percentage of the revenue received from the sale of certain
specified products or licensing activity. The Company is providing capital and
guidance to PSI to conduct a proof of concept study to improve an existing
therapeutic protein with the goal of validating the bioshielding technology for
further development and licensing the technology. During the year ended December
31, 2004, the Company paid $640,000 as specified in the agreement which brought
the total paid since the inception of the agreement to $720,000. The agreement
also calls for the Company to pay on behalf of PSI $280,000 of certain expenses
relating to testing of the bioshielding concept. During the years ended December
31, 2005 and 2004, the Company paid $0 and $85,324 of such expenses.
NOTE 12 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
- ---------------------------
In January 2006, the Company sold $250,000 of convertible nine month Promissory
Notes which bear 9% simple interest with net proceeds to the Company of
$223,880. In addition, these Promissory Notes have 416,666 detachable warrants
for each $25,000 of debt, resulting in 4,166,660 warrants being issued, which
entitle the holder to purchase one share of the Company's Common Stock at a
price of $.12 per share. The warrants are exercisable for a period of three
years from the date of the Promissory Note. These notes contain the same
convertible provision as described in Note 5. As compensation, the Company
issued 250,000 shares of its common stock and 416,666 warrants to the
underwriter. The warrants have the same terms and conditions as the warrants
issued in connection with the debt.
In January 2006, two holders of promissory notes converted their debt in the
amount of $45,000 into 765,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock.
In January 2006, the Company repaid $73,000 of promissory notes, of which,
$48,000 was to its President and CEO.
On January 19, 2006, Phase III Medical, Inc. ("Phase III" or the "Company")
consummated its acquisition of the assets of NeoStem, Inc. ("NeoStem"), a
California corporation. The purchased assets were those relating to NeoStem's
business of collecting and storing adult stem cells. The purchase price for
NeoStem's assets consisted of 5 million shares of the Company's common stock,
plus the assumption of certain liabilities of NeoStem and liabilities under
assumed contracts. Of the stock consideration, 60% (or 3 million shares) will be
retained in escrow for a period of one (1) year subject to certain
indemnification claims. The assumed liabilities of NeoStem as of the Closing
Date, including accounts payable and accrued liabilities, professional fees
incurred in the acquisition and capitalized lease obligations, were
approximately $465,000, of which holders agreed to the satisfaction of
approximately $82,000 of such liabilities by the issuance of an additional
2,012,225 shares of the Company's Common Stock. The amount of the consideration
paid pursuant to the Agreement was determined based on arms length negotiations
between the parties. The shares issued to NeoStem are subject to certain
piggyback registration rights. A copy of the Asset Purchase Agreement dated
December 6, 2005 among the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiary, Phase III
Medical Holding Company and NeoStem was annexed to the Company's Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2005. Effective with the acquisition, the
business of the Company has changed, so that the business of NeoStem now will be
the principal business of the Company. The Company will attempt to utilize the
combined Phase III and NeoStem management teams to develop and expand NeoStem's
adult stem cell processing and storage business, instead of its historic
business of providing capital and business guidance to companies in the
healthcare and life science industries.
In January 2006, the Company granted options to Larry May, the Company's Chief
Financial Officer, to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at
an exercise price of $.05. These options vest 50,000 per year for each of the
next three years. These options expire 10 years from the date of grant. The
Company also granted options to Denis Rodgerson, the Company's Director of Stem
Cell Science, to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at an
exercise price of $.05. These options vest one year from the date of grant.
These options expire 10 years from the date of grant.
F-24
On January 20, 2006, Robert Aholt tendered his resignation as Chief Operating
Officer of the Company. On March 31, 2006, the Company and Mr. Aholt entered
into a Settlement Agreement and General Release pursuant to which the Company
agrees to pay Mr. Aholt the aggregate sum of $250,000 (less applicable
withholdings and deductions), payable over a period of two years in biweekly
installments of $4,807.69 commencing on April 7, 2006, except that the first
payment will be $9,615.38. In the event of an uncured breach by the Company of
its payment obligations, the entire amount becomes due.
In March 2006, the Company granted options to a consultant to purchase 25,000
shares of the Company's Common Stock at an exercise price of $.08 which vest
immediately. These options expire tens years from the date of grant.
In March 2006, the Company issued warrants to purchase 120,000 shares of its
Common Stock at a price of $.10 per share to its marketing consultant. These
warrants vest 20,000 per month for six months. The warrants expire three years
from the date of issue.
On March 17, 2006, the stockholders of the Company voted to approve an amendment
to the Certificate of Incorporation which permits the Company to issue in
exchange for all 681,171 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding and its
obligation to pay $528,564 (or $.78 per share) in accrued dividends thereon, a
total of 5,449,368 shares of Common Stock (eight (8) shares of Common Stock per
share of Series A Preferred Stock). Pursuant thereto, all outstanding shares of
Series A Preferred Stock will be cancelled and converted into Common Stock.
On March 27, 2006, the Company sold 100,000 shares of its Common Stock to an
Advisory Board member at a price of $.053 per share resulting in net proceeds to
the Company of $5,300.
F-25