UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-QSB (Mark One) [X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 [ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _______ to _______ Commission file number 000-33153 STARMED GROUP, INC. ------------------- (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter) Nevada 52-2220728 ------ ---------- (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 2029 Century Park East, Suite 1112, Los Angeles, CA 90067 --------------------------------------------------------- (Address of principal executive offices) (310) 226-2555 -------------- (Issuer's telephone number) Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X] APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: As of August 11, 2006, the registrant had 22,418,424 shares of its common stock outstanding (not including 856,075 shares that the registrant is contractually obligated to issue as of August 4, 2006). Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format: Yes [ ] No [X] STARMED GROUP, INC. INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 PAGE PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2006 (unaudited) and December 31, 2005 ........................................... 2 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and six months ending June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005 (unaudited) ... 4 Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity (Deficit) for the six months ending June 30, 2006 (unaudited) ................. 5 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ending June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005 (unaudited) ..................... 6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) ............ 7 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation ......... 11 Item 3. Controls and Procedures ........................................... 17 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION ................................................. 17 CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION Certain disclosures in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Statements that include words such as "believe," "expect," "should," intend," "may," "anticipate," "likely," "contingent," "could," "may," "estimate," or other future-oriented statements, are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our business plans, strategies and objectives, and, in particular, statements referring to our expectations regarding our ability to continue as a going concern, implement our business model, increase our revenues and timely obtain required financing. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from anticipated results. The forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and what we believe are reasonable assumptions given our knowledge of the markets; however, our actual performance, results and achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Factors, within and beyond our control, that could cause or contribute to such differences include, among others, the following: our ability to implement our business plan and expand operations, raise sufficient working capital, penetrate its target market and establish its brand; the effects of competition; regulatory environments and general economic and business conditions; the effects of our competition; the success of our operating, marketing and growth initiatives; operating costs; the amount and effectiveness of our advertising and promotional efforts; and the prospect of adverse publicity. Readers are also urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and those detailed from time to time in our reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. When used in this Quarterly Report the terms the "Company," "StarMed," " we," "our" and "us" refers to StarMed Group, Inc, a Nevada corporation, and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Sierra Medicinals, Inc., an Arizona corporation. The information which appears on our web sites at www.starmedgroup.com and www.sierramed.com is not part of this Quarterly Report. 1 PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS STARMED GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) ________________________________________________________________________________ June 30, December 31, 2006 2005 ----------- ----------- ASSETS Current assets: Cash ............................................. $ 550,504 $ 1,019,259 Accounts receivable .............................. 5,392 7,489 Inventory ........................................ 24,717 22,110 Prepaid expenses ................................. 399,932 548,730 Deferred financing costs ......................... - 5,017 ----------- ----------- Total current assets ............................. 980,545 1,602,605 Equipment and furniture: Office furniture and computers ................... 68,060 65,063 Accumulated depreciation ......................... (44,489) (39,734) ----------- ----------- Total equipment and furniture .................... 23,571 25,329 Deferred tax assets ................................ - - Deposits ........................................... 7,316 700 ----------- ----------- Total assets ..................................... $ 1,011,432 $ 1,628,634 =========== =========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements 2 STARMED GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) ________________________________________________________________________________ June 30, December 31, 2006 2005 ----------- ----------- LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) Current liabilities: Accounts payable ................................. $ 63,570 $ 44,910 Accrued expenses ................................. 55,596 54,580 Income tax payable ............................... 9,524 9,359 Note payable ..................................... - 259,245 Capital lease obligation ......................... - 7,164 ----------- ----------- Total current liabilities ........................ 128,690 375,258 Commitments ........................................ - - Shareholders' equity (deficit): Preferred stock (par value $0.01) 25,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively ................ - - Common stock (par value $0.01) 100,000,000 shares authorized; 22,418,424 and 18,453,424 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively ............ 224,184 184,534 Common Stock and Warrants To Be Issued ........... 317,880 - Additional paid in capital ....................... 3,184,416 2,168,566 Accumulated deficit ................................ (2,843,738) (1,099,724) ----------- ----------- Total shareholders' equity (deficit) ............... 882,742 1,253,376 ----------- ----------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity ......... $ 1,011,432 $ 1,628,634 =========== =========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements 3 STARMED GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ FOR THE THREE MONTHS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, ENDING JUNE 30, ------------------------- ------------------------- 2006 2005 2006 2005 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Sales ................................................. $ 7,173 $ 3,527 $ 11,943 $ 9,731 Revenues from royalties ............................... 3,189 12,553 3,189 23,998 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total revenues .................................... 10,362 16,080 15,132 33,729 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Cost of sales ......................................... 1,067 4,709 2,662 9,416 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Gross profit .......................................... 9,295 11,371 12,470 24,313 General, selling and administrative expenses: Compensation ........................................ 154,500 20,518 863,594 78,631 Professional fees ................................... 129,543 19,254 391,865 34,221 Accounting fees ..................................... 16,638 11,719 64,194 16,238 Office .............................................. 20,724 5,814 48,625 9,170 Rent ................................................ 35,224 15,353 59,093 30,251 Insurance ........................................... 15,339 5,182 21,559 10,267 Advertising, marketing and promotion ................ 17,597 663 33,846 1,228 Depreciation ........................................ 2,431 2,324 4,755 4,648 Travel and entertainment ............................ 5,821 503 9,493 636 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total general, selling and administrative expenses 397,817 81,330 1,497,024 185,290 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Income (loss) from operations ......................... (388,522) (69,959) (1,484,554) (160,977) Total other income and (expense) Interest income ....................................... 5,449 - 13,315 - Gain on forgiveness of debt ........................... - - 44,245 - Interest expense ...................................... 860 (981) 860 (1,911) Common stock and warrants expense ..................... (317,880) - (317,880) - ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total other Income and (expense) ...................... (311,571) (981) (259,460) (1,911) Income (loss) before income taxes ..................... (700,093) (70,940) (1,744,014) (162,888) (Benefit) provision for income taxes ................. - - - 105,000 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Net income (loss) ..................................... $ (700,093) $ (70,940) $(1,744,014) $ (267,888) =========== =========== =========== =========== Net income (loss) per share - basic ................... $ (0.03) $ (0.01) $ (0.08) $ (0.03) =========== =========== =========== =========== Net income (loss) per share - diluted ................. $ (0.03) $ (0.01) $ (0.08) $ (0.03) =========== =========== =========== =========== Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic . 22,418,424 9,126,424 21,407,036 8,996,590 =========== =========== =========== =========== Weighted average number of shares outstanding - diluted 22,418,424 9,126,424 21,407,036 8,996,590 =========== =========== =========== =========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 4 STARMED GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) (UNAUDITED) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PREFERRED STOCK COMMON STOCK COMMON --------------------- ---------------------- SHARES AND NUMBER OF PAR VALUE NUMBER OF PAR VALUE PAID IN WARRANTS TO ACCUMULATED SHARES ($0.01) SHARES ($0.01) CAPITAL BE ISSUED (DEFICIT) TOTAL --------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 2005 (unaudited) .............. - $ - 18,453,424 $ 184,534 $2,168,566 $ - $(1,099,724) $ 1,253,376 --------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Common shares issued during six months ended June 30, 2006 For cash ................. - $ - 1,740,000 $ 17,400 $ 417,600 $ - $ - $ 435,000 For services provided .... - $ - 2,225,000 $ 22,250 $ 378,250 $ - $ - $ 400,500 For common shares and warrants to be issued .... - $ - - $ - - $ 317,880 $ - $ 317,880 Stock options issued during six months ended June 30, 2006 As compensation .......... - $ - - $ - $ 220,000 $ - $ - $ 220,000 Net Loss ................. - $ - - $ - $ - $ - $(1,744,014) $(1,744,014) --------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Balance at June 30, 2006 .. - $ - 22,418,424 $ 224,184 $3,184,416 $ 317,880 $(2,843,738) $ 882,742 ========= ========= ========== ========= ========== ========= =========== =========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 5 STARMED GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED) ________________________________________________________________________________ FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDING June 30, June 30, 2006 2005 ----------- ----------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net income (loss) ................................ $(1,744,014) $ (267,888) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash: Common Stock ..................................... 22,250 - Common Stock and Warrants to be Issued............ 317,880 - Additional Paid In Capital ....................... 598,250 - Note Payable ..................................... (44,245) - Depreciation ..................................... 4,755 4,648 Deferred Tax Assets .............................. - 105,000 Shares Issued for Services ....................... - 20,700 Operating assets: Accounts Receivable .............................. 2,097 (46,160) Decrease in Inventory ............................ (2,607) 3,774 Prepaid expenses ................................. 148,798 (22,273) (Decrease) Increase in Deposit ................... (6,616) 250 Increase in Accounts Payable ....................... 18,660 11,797 Accrued expenses ................................. 1,016 5,290 Decrease in Income tax payable ..................... 165 (3,000) ----------- ----------- Net Cash Used by Operating Activities .............. $ (683,611) $ (187,862) Cash flows from financing activities: Deferred financing costs............................ $ 5,017 - Note payable ....................................... (215,000) - Capital lease payments ............................. (7,164) (7,378) Loans from Shareholders ............................ - 20,000 Issuance of notes payable and warrants ............. - 450,000 Equipment .......................................... - 20,000 Cash received from issuance of common stock ........ 435,000 - ----------- ----------- Net cash provided (used) by financing activities ... $ 217,853 $ 462,622 Cash flows from Investing Activities: Office furniture and computer....................... (2,997) - ----------- ----------- Net cash provided (used) by financing activities ... $ (2,997) $ - Net increase (decrease) in cash .................... $ (468,755) $ 274,760 Cash, beginning of period .......................... $ 1,019,259 $ 72,708 ----------- ----------- Cash, end of period ................................ $ 550,504 $ 347,468 =========== =========== Supplemental information on non-cash and financing activities: Stock issued for cash............................... $ 435,000 $ - =========== =========== Stock issued for compensation and services ......... $ 220,000 $ 20,700 =========== =========== Stock options issued for compensation .............. $ 400,500 $ - =========== =========== Common Stock and Warrants to be issued ............. $ 317,880 $ - =========== =========== Supplemental cash flow information: Cash paid for interest ............................. $ - $ 1,911 =========== =========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements 6 STARMED GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED) ________________________________________________________________________________ 1. HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE COMPANY The Company was incorporated in Nevada on August 13, 1981, under the name Port Star Industries, Inc. and was organized to succeed to the properties, rights and obligations of Port Star Industries, Inc., a publicly-held North Carolina corporation formed on November 3, 1961 under the name of Riverside Homes, Inc. ("Port Star North Carolina"). At the time of our formation, Port Star North Carolina had no assets, liabilities or operations. In order to change the domicile of Port Star North Carolina to Nevada: o Port Star North Carolina caused the Company's formation under the laws of Nevada, with an authorized capitalization that "mirrored" the authorized capitalization of Port Star North Carolina, and o Issued to each stockholder of Port Star North Carolina a number of shares of our common stock equal to such stockholder's share ownership of Port Star North Carolina. At the time of the reincorporation, Herman Rappaport, the founder, president and chief executive officer was the principal stockholder of Port Star North Carolina. Port Star North Carolina conducted no operations subsequent to the reincorporation, and was administratively dissolved in 1988. The Company engaged in no material operations from the time of its formation in 1981, and, in 1985, Nevada revoked the charter for failing to file required reports. On January 10, 2000, the Company revived its Nevada charter and changed its name to StarMed Group, Inc. At the time of the revival, the Company had no assets or liabilities, and Mr. Rappaport continued as our majority stockholder, either directly or through his family trust. On July 27, 2001, the Company acquired Sierra Medicinals, Inc., an Arizona corporation incorporated in March 2000, in a share exchange whereby the Company issued a total of 469,792 shares of common stock for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Sierra Medicinals, Inc. Mr. Rappaport, either directly or through his family trust, was a majority stockholder of Sierra Medicinals, Inc. and now operates Sierra Medicinals, Inc. as a wholly owned subsidiary. On September 10, 2003, the Company formed Vet Medicinals, Inc. as a wholly owned subsidiary under the laws of the State of Nevada. Vet Medicinals, Inc. is currently inactive. The Company is engaged in two businesses: (1) we are developing a network of StarMed Wellness Centers that offer preventative, traditional medical and alternative treatments directed towards achieving "total wellness," and (2) we market a line of proprietary over-the-counter vitamins, minerals and other supplements under the StarMed and SierraMed brand names. Historically, the Company's operations were devoted to formulating and marketing a line of over-the-counter, alternative medicinal products. Severe competition in the medicinal product market and the loss of a significant distribution outlet whose revenues accounted for a substantial portion of the Company's 2004 revenues resulted in a significant reduction in the Company's product sales. Therefore, during fiscal 2005 the Company's management made a strategic decision to redirect its efforts to the development and establishment of a network of StarMed Wellness Centers. BASIS FOR PRESENTATION The financial information included herein is unaudited, however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal occurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods. The results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and the six months ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include footnotes and certain financial presentations normally required under generally accepted accounting principles; and therefore, should be read in conjunction with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A, filed on July 24, 2006, for the year ended December 31, 2005. 7 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. REVENUE RECOGNITION The Company has adopted SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements" (SAB 101) and accordingly recognizes revenue upon shipment of the product to customers, upon fulfillment of acceptance terms, if any, when no significant contractual obligations remain and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. Our sales of products allow customers a 30-day money back guarantee, less shipping costs, for unused products. The Company has adopted SFAS 48 "Revenue Recognition When Right of Return Exists" for the website sales and records revenue net of a provision for estimated product returns. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Financial instruments consist principally of cash, payables and accrued expenses. The estimated fair value of these instruments approximate their carrying value. INVENTORY The Company contracts a third party to process and package its formulated herbal products. The Company accounts for its inventory of finished goods on a first-in, first-out basis or based on fair market value, if it should be lower. EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE Equipment and furniture is stated at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets, which is seven years. The Company has acquired its computers under a capital lease. INCOME TAXES Deferred income taxes are reported using the liability method. Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for share-based payments under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion NO. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations, as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. In accordance with APB 25, no compensation cost was required to be recognized for options granted that had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The Company adopted FAS 123R using the modified prospective transition method. Under this method, compensation cost recognized in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and the six months ended June 30, 2006 includes: a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of FAS 123, and b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R. Since no stock options were granted to employees prior to December 31, 2005, the results for prior periods have not been restated. 8 As disclosed in Note 5, the Company issued 1,000,000 stock options to Herman Rappaport, an officer of the Company, in February 2006. The stock options were valued on the date of grant. The weighted average fair value of each option was $0.22. The fair value of the options were measured using the Black Scholes option pricing model. The model used the following assumptions: exercise price of $0.35, weighted average life of options of five years, risk free interest rate of 4.50%, and average dividend yield of 0.00%. The Company charged $220,000 to compensation expense during the first quarter of 2006. No options were granted during the three months ended June 30, 2006. ADVERTISING COSTS The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. LOSS PER SHARE In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 128 "Earnings Per Share" which requires the Company to present basic and diluted earnings per share, for all periods presented. The computation of loss per common share (basic and diluted) is based on the weighted average number of shares actually outstanding during the period. RECLASSIFICATIONS Certain amounts in the prior period presented have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statement presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on previously reported accumulated deficit. 3. CORPORATE CREDIT CARD The Company has available up to $21,000 from two unsecured corporate credit cards. The Company had an outstanding balance of $7,402 as of June 30, 2006, which is included in accounts payable. The Company intends to pay off all outstanding credit balances on a monthly basis. 4. DEBT On July 23, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement for the cancellation of the note payable in the amount of $467,255 including accrued interest through July 23, 2003, in exchange for the issuance of 82,300 restricted shares of common stock. The agreement included a guarantee and option whereby the Company guaranteed a market price of $3.50 per share in the event of the future sale of the shares by the related shareholder in the form of either cash or additional shares of common stock valued at the bid price on the date of payment. At that time, there was no public market for the Company's common stock. The Company's liability associated with the guarantee and option clause of the agreement of $288,050 was included in accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2005. The Company adopted the accounting provisions of EITF 00-19, "Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company's Own Stock". Based on this pronouncement, in 2005 the Company reduced the $288,050 liability included in accrued expenses to $259,245 which resulted in a gain of $28,805. This gain resulted from the reduction in the guarantee obligation based on the stock price changing from 1 to 35 cents at December 31, 2005. On February 7, 2006, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the creditor pursuant to which the 2003 agreement was rescinded and cancelled, the Company paid the creditor $215,000, the indebtedness was cancelled. The remaining balance of notes payable was included in Gain on forgiveness of debt of $44,245. 5. CAPITAL STOCK Between November 2005 and January 2006, the Company sold an aggregate of 9,442,000 units of our securities to 99 accredited investors in an offering exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on exemptions provided by Section 4(2) and Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act. Each unit was sold for a purchase price of $0.25, and consisted of one share of our common stock and one redeemable five year common stock purchase warrant, exercisable at $1.00 per share, which resulted in the issuance by us of an aggregate of 9,442,000 shares of common stock and common stock purchase warrants to purchase an additional 9,442,000 shares of our common stock. Gross proceeds were $2,360,500. Included in the total of 9,442,000 units are 1,740,000 units of securities sold on January 17, 2006, which resulted in gross proceeds of $435,000. 9 We agreed to file a registration statement with the SEC on or before March 20, 2006 covering the shares of common stock, including the shares underlying the warrants, issued in this offering so as to permit the resale thereof. We also agreed to use our best efforts to ensure that the registration statement be declared effective by the SEC by June 3, 2006. The registration statement was not filed until with the SEC until June 19, 2006, and it did not become effective until August 4, 2006. As a result, under the terms of the offering, we were required to issue an additional 856,075 shares of our common stock and common stock purchase warrants to purchase an additional 856,075 shares as of August 4, 2006. As of June 30, 2006, our obligation was to issue an additional 635,761 shares of our common stock and common stock purchase warrants to purchase an additional 635,761 shares, which obligation was valued at $317,880. The penalty shares of common stock, including the common stock underlying the additional warrants, were included in the registration statement. Subject to certain conditions, from the date the warrants were issued until 30 days prior to the expiration date of the warrants, the Company may require warrant holders to exercise or forfeit their warrants, provided that (i) the closing price for our common stock is at least $1.50 per share for 20 consecutive trading days and (ii) trading volume in our common stock exceeds 150,000 shares per day for each trading day during such twenty day period. For one year following the date of issuance, the Company is obligated to issue additional shares of Company common stock to purchasers of the units to protect them against dilution in the event that we issue shares of our common stock during such one-year period at less than $.25 per share. In addition, for a one year period following the date of issuance and continuing until the warrants expire, the exercise price is subject to "weighted-average" anti-dilution protection for subsequent issuances of common stock or securities convertible into common stock at less than the then current warrant exercise price, excluding certain issuances unrelated to capital raising transactions. The warrants also contain customary anti-dilution adjustments in the event of stock splits, reorganizations and similar corporate events. Joseph Stevens & Company, Inc. acted as placement agent for us in the offering. As compensation for their services we paid Joseph Stevens & Company, Inc. commissions equal to 10% of the gross proceeds of the offering ($236,500) and a non-accountable expense allowance equal to 3% of the gross proceeds ($70,815), and issued Joseph Stevens & Company, Inc. or its designees an aggregate of 2,225,000 shares of our common stock. (The shares of common stock were valued at $400,500.) We are using the net proceeds from the offering to establish additional StarMed Wellness Centers and for general working capital. 2004 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN In fiscal 2004 the Company established our 2004 Equity Compensation Plan. The original Plan was approved by our board of directors and a majority of our shareholders. The purpose of the Plan is to enable the Company to attract and retain top-quality employees, officers, directors and consultants and to provide such employees, officers, directors and consultants with an incentive to enhance stockholder returns. The Plan provides for the grant to Company directors, officers, employees and consultants of stock based awards and options to purchase shares of our common stock. All of our executive officers, directors and employees are be eligible to participate in the Plan. The plan is funded with 4,050,000 shares of Company common stock (including an increase of 3,000,000 shares authorized by the board of directors and a majority of our shareholders in February 2006). In February 2006, our Board of Directors granted Herman Rappaport an option to purchase 1,000,000 common shares at an exercise price of $.35. As of June 30, 2006, there were no other options granted under the Plan. In addition, as of June 30, 2006, 400,000 shares in stock awards have been issued under the Plan, and 2,650,000 shares remained available for issuance. 6. INCOME TAXES The Company had available unused federal and state operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $1,490,000 at December 31, 2005 that may be applied against future taxable income. SFAS No. 109 requires a valuation allowance to be recorded when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of December 31, 2005 the Company has determined that the net operating losses likely will not be utilized. Accordingly, the Company has increased the valuation allowance to 100% of all deferred tax assets. 7. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS The Company owes two officers/directors a total of $55,596 in expense reimbursements as of June 30, 2006 and 2005. These amounts are included in accrued expenses. In addition, as of June 30, 2006, Dr. Steve Rosenblatt, our Executive Vice President and director, owes $1,068 to the Company under the revolving line that we have established with him as part of our arrangement to manage the medically-supervised portion of StarMed Wellness Centers that is owned by him. 10 8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES OFFICE LEASE The Company entered into a twelve month lease for office space commencing November 1, 2003 that expired in October 31, 2004 and was extended for an additional year until December 31, 2005. The Company extended the lease for office space for three years commencing January 1, 2006 and expiring December 31, 2008. ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION OVERVIEW OF THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS StarMedGroup, Inc. is engaged in two businesses: (1) we are developing a network of StarMed Wellness Centers that offer preventative, traditional medical and alternative treatments directed towards achieving "total wellness," and (2) we market a line of over-the-counter vitamins, minerals and other supplements under the StarMed and SierraMed brand names. Historically our operations were devoted to formulating and marketing a line of over-the-counter, alternative medicinal products. All of our revenues for fiscal 2005 were from the sale of our products or royalties related to our products. Our natural medicinal products are intended to address the effects of various conditions, including arthritis, aging eyesight, obesity and irritable bowel syndrome. We also market a proprietary starch blocker designed for weight loss and maintenance and we have licensed various formulations of our proprietary starch blocker product to third parties. We currently market our medicinal products directly to consumers over the Internet. Severe competition in the medicinal product market and the loss of a significant distribution outlet in 2005 resulted in a significant reduction in our product sales. Therefore, in 2005, our management made a strategic decision to redirect our efforts to the development and establishment of a network of StarMed Wellness Centers. StarMed Wellness Centers will focus on promoting general wellness by addressing the underlying causes of a variety of chronic diseases such as obesity and stress. Our long-term goal is to develop a network of StarMed Wellness Centers each of which will provide clients a full range of preventative, traditional medical and alternative treatments directed towards achieving "total wellness." Our StarMed Wellness Centers concept is founded on our belief that traditional Western medicines and treatments may be enhanced by complementing their use with preventative medicine techniques and the use of alternative medicinals to address the underlying causes of certain illnesses. In our opinion, addressing these underlying causes is necessary for good health maintenance and longevity. Our management and affiliated physicians have devoted significant time, and pooled their collective experience, to develop our StarMed Wellness Center concept. It is envisioned that each StarMed Wellness Center will expand the traditional Western medical treatments, medicines and services provided by an existing medical clinic to include preventative and alternative healthcare services. We are developing two models for the operation of the wellness center. In one model, we will establish a wellness center on behalf of a medical clinic, which will operate as a participant in the StarMed Wellness Center network under the supervision of the clinic's existing medical director. Under this model, we will provide management services to the portion of the medical clinic's practice that is devoted to wellness in exchange for a management fee. In the second model, we will affiliate with a physician practice to establish a wellness center that is adjacent or in close proximity to a medical clinic. The physician practice may or may not have any existing relationship with the medical clinic and will supervise the physician services at the wellness center. Under this model, we will provide management services to the physician practice in exchange for a management fee. In February 2006, we began operations at our first wellness center in Encino, California. We opened our second wellness center in Buena Park, California in May 2006 and a third wellness center in Santa Ana, California in July 2006. Another wellness center is proposed for development in Kohala, Hawaii. Our ability to make these wellness centers successful will depend on several factors, including: identifying and entering into agreements with the right physicians who are committed to the wellness concept and the services that we offer at the wellness center; identifying and implementing the optimal strategy for marketing our services given our limited funds; and being able to raise additional capital to fund the opening, operations and marketing of additional centers. While we anticipate that our wellness centers will become a recurring market for our medicinal products in the future, we do not expect that our marketing of natural medicinal products will consume a significant portion of our future operating resources, or that medicinal product sales will account for a substantial portion of our future revenues. 11 CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES A summary of significant accounting policies is included in Note 2 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this quarterly report. We believe that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables our company to provide useful and reliable financial information about the company's operating results and financial condition. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS On January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for share-based payments under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations, as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. In accordance with APB 25, no compensation cost was required to be recognized for options granted that had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The Company adopted FAS 123R using the modified prospective transition method. Under this method, compensation cost recognized during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006 includes: a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of FAS 123, and b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R. Since no stock options were granted to employees prior to December 31, 2005, the results for prior periods have not been restated. In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151, "Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4" ("SFAS 151"), which is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. SFAS 151 requires that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material be recognized as current period charges. The Statement also requires that the allocation of fixed production overhead be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The effect of this Statement on our financial position or results of operations has been determined to have no impact. In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 153, "Exchange of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29" ("SFAS 153"). The guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, "Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions" is based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. The guidance in that Opinion, however, included certain exceptions to that principle. SFAS 153 amends Opinion 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The provisions of SFAS 153 shall be effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The effect of this Statement on our financial position or results of operations has been determined to have no impact. In April 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations", which clarifies that an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability's fair value can be reasonably estimated. The fair value of a liability for the conditional asset retirement obligation should be recognized when incurred, which is generally upon acquisition, construction, or development and (or) through the normal operation of the asset. Uncertainty about the timing and (or) method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation should be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information exists. Interpretation No. 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The effect of this Statement on our financial position or results of operations has been determined to have no impact. 12 In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3" (SFAS154). This Statement replaces APB Opinion No. 20, "Accounting Changes," and FASB Statement No. 3, "Reporting Accounting Changes Interim Financial Statements," and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. This Statement requires retrospective application to financial statements of prior periods for changes in accounting principle. This Statement is effective January 1, 2006. The effect of this Statement on our financial position or results of operations has been determined to have no impact. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Total Net Revenues Total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $15,132 as compared to $33,729 during the same period in 2005, a decrease of $18,597, or approximately 55%. Total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006 were $10,362 as compared to $16,080 during the same period in 2005, a decrease of $5,718, or approximately 36%. Revenues from the sale of products declined to $5,329 during the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $9,731 during the same period in 2005, and declined to $1,888 during the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $3,527 during the same period in 2005. Several factors contributed to the decrease in sales of our products. First, we have diverted our limited resources from marketing efforts to the implementation of plans to open wellness centers. In redirecting our efforts to the opening of wellness centers, we made the decision not to expend a substantial amount of our funds into advertising, marketing and promotion of our products. In the future, as we grow our number of wellness centers, we intend to grow the market for our products through direct sales to our wellness center customers. We will also be seeking new distribution channels and partners for our products here in the U.S. and overseas and will continue to market and sell our products through the internet. Revenues from royalty payments was $3,189 during the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $23,998 during the same period in 2005, and was $3,189 during the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $12,553 during the same period in 2005. The decrease in revenues from royalties was the result of the loss of a distribution channel for our weight loss product. L. Perrigo Company, the principal distributor for our weight loss products in the U.S., orally notified us in 2005 that it will cease to distribute our weight loss products. We generated sales of $6,614 during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and $4,747 during the three months ended June 30, 2006, from services provided at our first wellness center in Encino, California, which began operations in February 2006. While our recent marketing efforts have resulted in increased customer interest and business, our biggest challenge has been the integration of our personnel with our physician partner's personnel. If this difficulty in integration cannot be worked out, we may need to relocate the facility to another location within the same community or partner with a different physician. If we can resolve our differences with our current physician partner, we anticipate that our revenues from our wellness operations will increase as our marketing and promotion efforts begin to generate more customers. We do not know, however, when, if ever, we will be able to generate sufficient revenues to cover our expenses at our Encino facility. If our revenues from the Encino facility does not significantly improve during the third and fourth quarters of 2006, we will likely have to close down the facility. We opened our second wellness center in Buena Park, California, in May 2006. We did not generate any revenues at our Buena Park wellness center during the second quarter of 2006, but we expect that we will begin to generate revenues as we increase our efforts at marketing that facility. At this time, we cannot predict future revenues from or performance of our Buena Park wellness center. We earned interest income of $13,315 and $0 during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $5,449 and $0 during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The interest income in 2006 reflects the cash balances resulting from the gross proceeds of $2,360,000 from a private equity financing conducted between December 2005 and February 2006 that resulted in the sale of an aggregate of 9,442,000 units of our common stock. 13 Total Expenses We reported total selling, general and administrative expenses of $1,497,024 during the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $185,290 during the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $1,311,734, or approximately 708%. We attribute the increase primarily to: (a) an increase of $784,963, or 998%, in compensation expenses as a result of: (i) a one-time stock compensation expense of $400,500 in connection with the issuance of 2,225,000 shares of our common stock valued at $0.18 per share on March 16, 2006 to the placement agent and its designees in connection with our recent capital raising efforts completed during the first quarter of 2006 and consulting services; (ii) the charge of $220,000 to compensation expense for the stock option granted to Herman Rappaport during the first quarter of 2006, and (iii) the hiring of personnel to staff our first and second wellness centers and to develop our wellness center network and the addition of staff in our corporate office; (b) an increase of $357,644, or approximately 1,045%, in professional fees, and an increase of $47,956, or 295%, in accounting fees, primarily in connection with our capital raising efforts and the engagement of consultants for business development and expansion; (c) an increase of $68,297, or 173%, in rent and office expenses, primarily as a result of the lease of new space for our first and second wellness centers and the purchase of supply and equipment for those centers, as well the increase in monthly rent for our corporate office; (d) an increase of $11,292, or 110%, in insurance expense which reflects an increase in health and general liability insurance premiums and the acquisition of a directors and officers insurance policy; (e) an increase of $32,618, or approximately 2,658%, in advertising, marketing and promotional expenses, primarily in connection with the opening of our first two wellness centers; and (f) an increase of $8,857, or approximately 1,393%, in travel and entertainment expenses, primarily in connection with our business development and expansion efforts. For the three months ended June 30, 2006, we reported total selling, general and administrative expenses of $397,817 compared to $81,330 during the same period in 2005. We attribute the increase primarily to the following: (a) an increase of $133,982, or 653%, in compensation expenses as a result of the hiring of personnel to staff our first and second wellness center and to develop our wellness center network and the addition of staff in our corporate office; (b) an increase of $110,289, or approximately 573%, in professional fees, and an increase of $4,919, or 42%, in accounting fees, primarily in connection with our ongoing capital raising efforts and the engagement of consultants for business development and expansion; (c) an increase of $34,781, or 164%, in rent and office expenses, primarily as a result of the lease of new space for our first and second wellness centers and the purchase of supply and equipment for those centers, as well the increase in monthly rent for our corporate office; (d) an increase of $10,154, or 196%, in insurance expense which reflects an increase in health and general liability insurance premiums and the acquisition of a directors and officers insurance policy; (e) an increase of $16,934, or approximately 2,554%, in advertising, marketing and promotional expenses, primarily in connection with the opening of our first two wellness centers; and (f) an increase of $5,318, or approximately 1,057%, in travel and entertainment expenses, primarily in connection with our business development and expansion efforts. We anticipate that our total general, selling and administrative expenses will continue to increase as we market our existing centers and develop and open new wellness centers. We are not able to predict at this time the amount of increase in total general, selling and administrative expenses that will be attributable to the wellness centers, nor can we predict whether such increases will ultimately be offset by increased revenues from the wellness centers. Total Other Income (Expense) We reported total other expense of $259,460 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to total other expense of $1,911 during same period in 2005, an increase of $257,549, and $311,571 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $981 during the same period in 2005, an increase of $310,590. The increase in total other expense is primarily attributable to the expense of $317,880 associated with our contractual obligation to issue 635,761 shares and 635,761 shares underlying warrants as of June 30, 2006 to investors who purchased our securities during our November 2005 - February 2006 stock offering as a result of our failure to register the shares and warrants originally purchased and to have the registration statement be declared effective on a timely basis. The shares were valued at $190,728 based on our stock's last quoted trading price of $.30 on or before June 30, 2006. The warrants were valued at $127,152 based on a Black-Scholes valuation using the following 14 assumptions: market value of $.30 per share, volatility of 71.23%, an exercise price of $.25, a term of 5 years, interest rate of 5.10% and variance of 0.50737129. The penalty shares are described in further detail in the "Recent Events" section below. Our total other expense was offset by the following total other income: (i) interest income of $13,315 and $5,449 during the six month period and three month period ending June 30, 2006, respectively, reflecting the cash balances resulting from the gross proceeds of $2,360,000 from the November 2005 - February 2006 private equity financing that resulted in the sale of an aggregate of 9,442,000 units of our common stock; and (ii) a gain of $44,245 from forgiveness of debt during the first quarter of 2006. We reported an interest expense credit of $860 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to interest expense of $1,911 for the same period in 2005, and interest expense credit of $860 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to interest expense of $981 for the same period in 2005. Interest expense represents interest payable on our corporate credit cards which now are paid in full at due date. We reported a net loss of $1,744,014 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $162,888 for the same period in 2005, and $700,093 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $70,940 during the same period in 2005. The net loss was primarily attributable to the increase in expenses relating to our capital raising efforts and the establishment of our first and second wellness centers, with no corresponding increases in revenue. As we are only beginning to develop a network of wellness centers, we anticipate that we will continue to incur losses in the near future. Our ability to increase revenues while controlling costs will depend on various factors, including our ability to implement our business plan and expand operations, raise sufficient working capital, penetrate our target markets and establish our brand, deal with competition, comply with federal and state regulations, manage expenses, and create a successful advertising and promotional campaign. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Liquidity is the ability of a company to generate funds to support its current and future operations, satisfy its obligations and otherwise operate on an ongoing basis. At June 30, 2006, we had cash on hand of $550,504 as compared to cash on hand of $347,468 at June 30, 2005 and the December 31, 2005 cash balance of $1,019,259. At June 30, 2006 our working capital was $851,855 as compared to working capital of $1,227,347 at December 31, 2005. The increase in working capital is primarily attributable to an increase in cash which was provided by capital raising activities in December 2005 and the first quarter of 2006. Net cash used in operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $683,611 as compared to $187,862 during the same period in 2005, an increase of $495,749, or 264%. We attribute the increase primarily to our increased expenses, a one-time settlement of $215,000 paid to Citadel Management Group, Inc., and a charge to prepaid expense of $568,750, which represented the value of shares issued in exchange for consulting services, amortized over a period of 23 months beginning the first quarter of 2006 for a charge each quarter of $74,181. Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $217,853 compared to $462,622 during the same period in 2005. The change reflects proceeds received from our capital raising transactions. In January 2006, we raised $417,000 in proceeds from the sale of our securities. Our working capital is sufficient to satisfy our current obligations and fund our ongoing expenses for another four to nine months, depending on various factors, including the ability of our wellness centers to generate sufficient revenues to sustain operations. As we continue to develop additional wellness centers and our operations grow, we will need to raise additional working capital. Other than cash on hand and available borrowings under our corporate credit cards that could provide us up to $21,000 on an unsecured basis, we do not have any other external sources of working capital. Implementation of our business plan, including the development of a network of wellness centers and funding ongoing operations as they become due, will require substantial additional capital. Until such time, if at all, as our wellness center operations generate sufficient revenues to sustain operations, we will likely continue to fund operations through the sale of equity or debt securities, or a combination of both. If we are unable to secure additional working capital, as needed, our ability to open wellness centers, grow revenues, meet operating and financing obligations as they become due, and continue business and operations, will be in jeopardy. 15 RECENT EVENTS Issuance of Penalty Shares and Warrants Between November 2005 and January 2006, the Company sold an aggregate of 9,442,000 units of our securities to 99 accredited investors in an offering exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on exemptions provided by Section 4(2) and Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act. Each unit was sold for a purchase price of $0.25, and consisted of one share of our common stock and one redeemable five year common stock purchase warrant, exercisable at $1.00 per share, which resulted in the issuance by us of an aggregate of 9,442,000 shares of common stock and common stock purchase warrants to purchase an additional 9,442,000 shares of our common stock. We agreed to file a registration statement with the SEC on or before March 20, 2006 covering the shares of common stock, including the shares underlying the warrants, issued in this offering so as to permit the resale thereof. We also agreed to use our best efforts to ensure that the registration statement be declared effective by the SEC by June 3, 2006. The registration statement was not filed with the SEC until June 19, 2006, and it did not become effective until August 4, 2006. As a result, under the terms of the offering, we were required to issue an additional 856,075 shares of our common stock and common stock purchase warrants to purchase an additional 856,075 shares as of August 4, 2006. As of June 30, 2006, our obligation was to issue an additional 635,761 shares of our common stock and common stock purchase warrants to purchase an additional 635,761 shares, which obligation was valued at $317,880. The penalty shares of common stock, including the common stock underlying the additional warrants, were included in the registration statement. Agreement with Mothers and Daughters Center May Be in Jeopardy In July 2006, we announced the opening of our third wellness center in collaboration with and adjacent to the Mothers and Daughters Center in Santa Ana, California. An issue regarding compensation has arisen that, if not resolved, could jeopardize the relationship between the two parties. If this issue cannot be resolved, we will need to close down the facility. If we have to take such action, we would be adversely impacted primarily in two ways: (1) we will have wasted time, effort and expense in opening and marketing the center, and (2) it sets back our time frame to increase our revenues through the expansion of our network of wellness centers. OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS Under SEC regulations, we are required to disclose our off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors. An off-balance sheet arrangement means a transaction, agreement or contractual arrangement to which any entity that is not consolidated with us is a party, under which we have: o Any obligation under certain guarantee contracts; o Any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that entity for such assets; o Any obligation under a contract that would be accounted for as a derivative instrument, except that it is both indexed to our stock and classified in stockholder's equity in our statement of financial position; and o Any obligation arising out of a material variable interest held by us in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to us, or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us. As of the date of this Report, the Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors. SEASONALITY AND INFLATION Our business is not seasonal in nature, and management does not believe that our operations have been materially influenced by inflationary forces. 16 ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Our management has concluded its evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, such as this Quarterly Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods described by SEC rules and regulations, and to reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. As of the evaluation date, our Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer concluded that we maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by SEC rules and regulations, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including its Chief Executive Officer and its acting Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation that occurred during its last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. PART III OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 6. EXHIBITS 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. SIGNATURES In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Dated: August 14, 2006 STARMED GROUP, INC. By: /s/ Herman Rappaport -------------------- Herman Rappaport, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer 17