As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 23, 2011

Registration No. 333-165638
================================================================================
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada 3444 26-4549003
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) Classification Code Number) Identification Number)

670 E. Parkridge, Suite 112
Corona, CA 92879
(877) 520-5005
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices
and principal place of business)

Jeffrey S. Brain, President and Chief Executive Officer
15303 Ventura Blvd., 9th Floor, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
(877) 520-5005
(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)

Copy to:
David E. Wise, Esq.
Attorney at Law
The Colonnade, 9901 IH-10 West, Suite 800
San Antonio, Texas 78230
(210) 558-2858 (210) 579-1775 (facsimile)

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: From time to
time after the effective date of this registration statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a
delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of
1933, check the following box. [X]

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant
to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the
Securities Act Registration Statement number of the earlier effective
Registration Statement for the same offering. [ ]

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under
the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
Registration Statement number of the earlier effective Registration Statement
for the same offering. [ ]

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under
the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
Registration Statement number of the earlier effective Registration Statement
for the same offering. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated Filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [X]
(Do not check if a Smaller reporting company)

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

============================================================================================================
Title of Each Class Proposed Maximum Proposed Maximum
of Securities Amount to Be Offering Price Aggregate Amount of
to be Registered Registered (1) per Share (2) Offering Price Registration Fee (3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Stock, 966,049 $ .25 $241,512.25 $17.22
$.001 par value
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals 966,049 $ .25 $241,512.25 $17.22
============================================================================================================

(1) Represents shares of common stock offered for resale by shareholders of
record beginning when this Registration Statement becomes effective.
(2) This price was arbitrarily determined by us.
(3) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee under
Rule 457 (0) of the Securities Act.

THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES
AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE
A FURTHER AMENDMENT THAT SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT
SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OR UNTIL THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON
SUCH DATE AS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID
SECTION 8(A), MAY DETERMINE.
================================================================================

EXPLANATORY NOTE

A Registration Statement by Ciralight Global, Inc., a Nevada corporation
("Company") (Registration No. 333-165638) ("Registration Statement") was
declared effective on July 29, 2010 ("Effective Date") for the purpose of
registering 966,049 shares of our common stock offered for resale by the
Company's shareholders ("Offering") under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. As of the date of hereof, no shares have been sold pursuant to the
Offering.

This Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 ("Amendment") is filed in order to update
the Company's Financial Statements and to include information that was included
in our Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2011, that was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on November 14, 2011.

THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE
CHANGED. THIS PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES
AND IT IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE
OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED __________, 2011

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
966,049 Shares of Common Stock

Ciralight Global, Inc. is registering an aggregate of 966,049 shares of our
common stock to be sold, from time to time, by one or more of the selling
shareholders, none of whom is an officer or director of Ciralight Global, Inc.
The selling shareholders may only offer and sell, from time to time, common
stock using this prospectus in transactions at a fixed offering price of $.25
per share until a trading market develops in our common stock, at which time the
selling shareholders may sell shares at prevailing market prices, which may
vary, or they may sell shares at privately negotiated prices. The proceeds from
the sale of the selling shareholders' shares will go directly to the selling
shareholders and will not be available to us.

The selling shareholders and any broker/dealer executing sell orders on
behalf of the selling shareholders may be deemed to be "underwriters" within the
meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Currently, no public market exists for our common stock We have a market
maker who would like to publish quotations for our common stock on the OTC
Bulletin Board ("OTCBB"), which is maintained by the Financial Institutions
National Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"). However, our market maker has not
received approval from FINRA to publish quotations for our common stock. We
cannot assure you that a public market for our common stock will develop.
Ownership of our common stock is likely to be an illiquid investment.

INVESTING IN OUR COMMON STOCK INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. WE URGE YOU
TO READ THE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 5.

Brokers or dealers effecting transactions in these shares should confirm
that the shares are registered under the applicable state law or that an
exemption from registration is available.

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES
COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR DETERMINED IF THIS
PROSPECTUS IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A
CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We
have not authorized anyone to provide you with different information. If anyone
provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on
it. We are not making an offer to sell securities in any jurisdiction where an
offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information appearing
in this prospectus is accurate as of the date on the front cover of this
prospectus only. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects may have changed since that date.

November __, 2011

THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES
AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE
A FURTHER AMENDMENT THAT SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT
SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OR UNTIL THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON
SUCH DATE AS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID
SECTION 8(A) MAY DETERMINE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
----

GENERAL 3
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY 3
RISK FACTORS 5
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS 12
TAX CONSIDERATIONS 12
USE OF PROCEEDS 13
DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE 13
DILUTION 13
SELLING SHAREHOLDERS 13
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION 15
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS 19
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES 20
INTERESTS OF NAMED EXPERTS AND COUNSEL 23
LEGAL REPRESENTATION 23
EXPERTS 23
TRANSFER AGENT 23
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS 23
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS 34
SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA 35
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 36
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 48
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 48
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 51
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT 55
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS 56
DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES
ACT LIABILITIES 59
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 59
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS F-1

YOU SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT OR TO WHICH
WE HAVE REFERRED YOU. WE HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH
INFORMATION THAT IS DIFFERENT. THIS DOCUMENT MAY ONLY BE USED WHERE IT IS LEGAL
TO SELL THESE SECURITIES. THE INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT MAY ONLY BE ACCURATE
ON THE DATE OF THIS DOCUMENT.

GENERAL

As used in this prospectus, references to "Ciralight Global," "Ciralight,"
"company," "we," "our," "ours" and "us" refer to Ciralight Global, Inc., a
Nevada corporation, unless the context otherwise requires. In addition, any
references to "financial statements" are to our financial statements contained
herein, except as the context otherwise requires and any references to "fiscal
year" refers to our fiscal year ending December 31. Unless otherwise indicated,
the terms "Common Stock," "common stock" and "shares" refer to shares of our
$.001 par value, common stock.

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

THIS SUMMARY HIGHLIGHTS INFORMATION CONTAINED ELSEWHERE IN THIS PROSPECTUS.
YOU SHOULD READ THE ENTIRE PROSPECTUS CAREFULLY, INCLUDING THE DETAILED
INFORMATION CONTAINED UNDER THE HEADING "RISK FACTORS," THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN
THIS PROSPECTUS.

THE COMPANY

WHERE YOU CAN FIND US

Our principal executive offices are located at 670 E. Parkridge, Suite 112,
Corona, CA 91403. Our telephone number is (877) 520-5005. Our website address is
http://www.ciralightglobal.com.

The information on our website is not a part of this prospectus.

CORPORATE BACKGROUND

We were incorporated in the state of Nevada on February 26, 2009, under the
name "Ciralight West, Inc." On March 13, 2009, we changed our name to "Ciralight
Global, Inc." We are a manufacturer and wholesaler of "advanced skylights" for
use in warehouses, schools, retail stores, airports, military installations and
residential buildings.

Prior to our incorporation, there existed a company named "Ciralight, Inc."
(referred to herein as "Old Ciralight") that was in the advanced skylights
business. By the end of 2008, Old Ciralight was in dire financial straits and
was having difficulty retaining staff, making sales, paying for component parts
and other trade payables, paying its office and warehouse rents and servicing
its heavy debt load. In January 2009, several officers and directors resigned
from Old Ciralight and many of its employees either left the company or were
laid off.

On January 27, 2009, Old Ciralight granted Mr. George Adams, Sr., its only
secured creditor, the right to (i) manufacture the Old Ciralight product on an
exclusive basis and unconditionally and (ii) market and sell the its product,
and agreed to ship all of its inventory to a facility owned or controlled by Mr.
Adams in Anaheim, California. For all intents and purposes, Old Ciralight ceased
its operations on January 27, 2009.

the Suntracker One(TM) products, leased warehouse space, negotiated with
suppliers for component parts, agreed to repair or replace defective products
that had been previously sold by Old Ciralight and installed by Old Ciralight's
dealers and contractors.

On March 15, 2009, Mr. Adams formally foreclosed on all of the assets of
Old Ciralight. By the end of March 2009, Mr. Adams and Ciralight Global, Inc.'s
management began negotiations pursuant to which Ciralight Global, Inc. would
purchase all of the foreclosed assets from Mr. Adams.

In April 2009, we entered into an Exchange of Stock for Assets Agreement
with Mr. Adams ("Adams Agreement") to acquire certain assets including, but not
limited to, a United States patent, a United States patent application, a
Canadian patent application, a European patent application and a Mexican patent
application, artwork, trademarks, equipment, furniture, databases, technical
drawings, promotional materials, trade names and inventory parts and marketing
rights related to the Suntracker One(TM), Suntracker Two(TM) previously owned
and distributed by Old Ciralight,, such assets having been foreclosed on by Mr.
Adams, who was the secured creditor of Old Ciralight. We did not acquire any
equity securities of Old Ciralight. We did not acquire any assets directly from
Old Ciralight and we have no affiliation, contractual or otherwise, with Old
Ciralight.

In April 2009, we acquired all of the above described assets from Mr.
Adams, except for the United States patent and the patent applications pending
in Canada, Europe, Mexico and the United States, in exchange for 3,200,000
shares of our common stock and 1,000,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock.
In December 2009, we acquired the United States patent and the patent
applications pending in Canada, Europe, Mexico and the United States from Mr.
Adams in exchange for the issuance by us of an additional 400,000 shares of our
common stock and a convertible promissory note in the amount of $250,000. The
promissory note we issued to Mr. Adams is convertible into shares of our common
stock at a conversion rate of one share per $.25 of outstanding principal and
interest. As a result of this transaction, Mr. Adams is our largest shareholder
and has voting control over us.

THE OFFERING

Securities Being Offered Up to 966,049 shares of common stock.

Initial Offering Price The selling shareholders will sell our shares
at $.25 per share until our shares are quoted
on the OTC Bulletin Board and thereafter at
prevailing market prices or privately
negotiated prices. This price was arbitrarily
determined by our board of directors and may
not be indicative of the real value of a
share of our common stock.

Terms of the Offering The selling shareholders will determine when
and how they will sell their common stock
offered in this prospectus.

Termination of the Offering The offering will conclude when all of the
966,049 shares of common stock have been sold
or we, in our sole discretion, decide to
terminate the registration of the shares.

Risk Factors The securities offered hereby involve a high
degree of risk and should not be purchased by
investors who cannot afford the loss of their
entire investment. See "Risk Factors"
beginning on page 5.

Common Stock Issued and
Outstanding Before Offering 14,307,567 shares of our common stock are
issued and outstanding as of the date of this
prospectus. All of the common stock to be
sold under this prospectus will be sold by
the selling shareholders.

Use of Proceeds We will not receive any proceeds from the
sale of the common stock by the selling
shareholders.

RISK FACTORS

PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING RISK FACTORS BEFORE DECIDING TO INVEST IN OUR
COMMON STOCK.

This offering and any investment in our common stock involves a high degree
of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described
below and all of the information contained in this prospectus before deciding
whether or not to purchase our common stock. The risks and uncertainties
described below are those that our management currently believes may
significantly affect us. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed and
investors in our common stock could lose part or all of their investment in our
shares The numbers preceding the risk factors below are for ease of reference
only and are not intended as a ranking of such risk factors.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

1. WE DO NOT HAVE AN INDEPENDENT AUDIT OR COMPENSATION COMMITTEE. THE ABSENCE
OF WHICH COULD LEAD TO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OF OUR OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
AND WORK AS A DETRIMENT TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS.

We do not have an independent audit or compensation committee. The absence
of an independent audit and compensation committee could lead to conflicts of
interest of our officers and directors, which could work as a detriment to our
shareholders.

2. WE HAVE A VERY LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY AND THERE IS NO ASSURANCE THAT OUR
FUTURE OPERATIONS WILL RESULT IN REVENUES OR PROFITS. IF WE CANNOT GENERATE
SUFFICIENT REVENUES TO OPERATE PROFITABLY, THEN WE MAY SUSPEND OR CEASE OUR
OPERATIONS AND YOU COULD EVEN LOSE YOUR ENTIRE INVESTMENT IN OUR COMMON
STOCK.

We were incorporated on February 26, 2009, and generated $2,237,669 in
revenues through September 30, 2011. However, we have not generated any
cumulative profits. We also have a limited operating history upon which an
evaluation of our future success or failure can be made. From February 26, 2009,
through September 30, 2011, we had incurred a cumulative net loss of $2,431,031.
The success of our future operations is dependent upon our ability to carry out
our planned marketing and sales activities, fund our operations and compete
effectively with other skylight manufacturers. Based on our current business
plan, we expect to incur operating losses through the fourth quarter of 2011 and
be profitable in the first quarter of 2012. We cannot guarantee that we will
ever be successful in generating revenues sufficient to cover our operating
costs and overhead or achieve profitability. Our failure to achieve
profitability may cause us to suspend or cease our operations.

3. AS A RESULT OF OUR INTENSELY COMPETITIVE INDUSTRY, WE MAY NOT GAIN ENOUGH
MARKET SHARE TO BE PROFITABLE.

The industrial lighting industry is intensely competitive. We have numerous
competitors in the United States and elsewhere. Our major competitors in the
active skylight market are Solar Tracking Skylights, Inc., Natural Lighting,
Inc. and Sundolier. Our major competitors in the passive skylight market are

Solatube, Inc., Sun Optics and Mondraught Skylights. These competitors have
already successfully marketed and commercialized products that compete with our
products.

Most of our passive skylight competitors have greater financial resources,
larger staffs and more effective marketing and manufacturing organizations than
ours, while our active skylight competitors are smaller companies with minor, if
any, competitive advantages over us.

Our competitors may succeed in developing or licensing products and
technologies that are more effective or less costly than our products and the
products that we are developing. If we are unable to compete successfully, we
will not be able to sell enough products at a price sufficient to permit us to
generate profits.

4. OUR ABILITY TO ACHIEVE ANY SIGNIFICANT REVENUE WILL DEPEND ON OUR ABILITY
TO ESTABLISH EFFECTIVE SALES AND MARKETING CAPABILITIES.

Our success is dependent up our ability to effectively and profitably
produce, market and sell our products. If we fail to establish sufficient
marketing and sales forces or to make alternative arrangements to have our
products marketed and sold by others on attractive terms, our ability to enter
new or existing markets will be impaired. Our inability to effectively enter
these markets would materially and adversely affect our ability to generate
significant revenues.

5. WE DEPEND HEAVILY ON OUR MANAGEMENT TEAM AND CONSULTANTS AND THE LOSS OF
ANY OF OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS COULD SIGNIFICANTLY WEAKEN OUR MANAGEMENT
EXPERTISE AND ABILITY TO RUN OUR BUSINESS.

Our business strategy and success is dependent on the skills and knowledge
of our management team and consultants. As of the date of this prospectus,
Jeffrey S. Brain is our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and Chief Operating Officer. We also operate with a small number of
advisors and consultants and, therefore, have little backup capability for their
activities. The loss of services of one or more members of our management team
or advisors could weaken significantly our management expertise and our ability
to efficiently run our business. We do not maintain key man life insurance
policies on any of our officers.

6. THE MARKETABILITY AND PROFITABILITY OF OUR PRODUCTS IS SUBJECT TO UNKNOWN
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, WHICH COULD SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT OUR BUSINESS,
FINANCIAL CONDITION, THE MARKETABILITY OF OUR PRODUCTS AND OUR
PROFITABILITY.

The marketability and profitability of our products may be adversely
affected by local, regional, national and international economic conditions
beyond our control and/or the control of our management, which could
significantly impact our business, financial condition, the marketability of our
products and our ability to earn a profit. Favorable changes may not necessarily
enhance the marketability of our products or our profitability.

7. WE ARE VULNERABLE TO THE CURRENT ECONOMIC CRISIS WHICH MAY NEGATIVELY
AFFECT OUR PROFITABILITY.

Industrial spending is generally affected by a number of factors including
general economic conditions, inflation, interest rates, tax rates, gasoline and
other energy costs and consumer confidence, generally, all of which are beyond
our control. We are currently in a severe worldwide economic recession. Runaway
deficit spending by the United States government and other countries further
exacerbates the United States and worldwide economic climate and may delay or
possibly deepen the current recession. Currently, a lot of economic indicators
suggest rising energy costs, higher inflation, dwindling consumer confidence and
substantially higher taxes. Industrial purchases of our products tend to decline
during recessionary periods when disposable revenue is lower and may impact
sales of our products. In addition, sudden disruptions in business conditions as
a result of a terrorist attack similar to the events of September 11, 2001,
including further attacks, retaliation and the threat of further attacks or

retaliation, war, adverse weather conditions or other natural disasters, such as
Hurricane Katrina, pandemic situations or large scale power outages can have a
short term or, sometimes, long term impact on spending. Further downturn in the
economies in which we sell our products or a sudden disruption of business
conditions in those economies could adversely affect our business. The worldwide
recession is placing severe constraints on the ability of all companies,
particularly smaller ones, to raise capital, borrow money, operate effectively
and profitably and to plan for the future.

8. OUR SUCCESS DEPENDS, IN PART, ON THE QUALITY OF OUR PRODUCTS BECAUSE IF OUR
PRODUCTS ARE DEFECTIVE OR OTHERWISE FAIL TO MEET OUR CUSTOMERS' AND
DISTRIBUTORS STANDARDS, OUR CUSTOMER AND DISTRIBUTORSHIP RELATIONS COULD
SUFFER.

Our success depends, in part, on the quality of our products. If our
products are found to be defective or if they otherwise fail to meet our
customers' and distributors' standards, our relationships with our customers and
distributors could suffer, we could need to recall some of our products, our
reputation could be diminished and we could lose market share, any of which
could result in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.

9. OUR SUCCESS DEPENDS ON OUR ABILITY TO FULLY EXECUTE OUR BUSINESS STRATEGY.

* increase our product sales and market share and strengthen our brand
image;
* implement appropriate product mixes and pricing strategies;
* implement enterprise resource planning and our strategic sourcing
initiative; and
* obtain new customers through a combination of new businesses, new
channels and pursuit of strategic opportunities such as acquisitions,
joint ventures and strategic alliances with other companies.

There can be no assurance that any of these initiatives will be
successfully and fully executed within the planned time periods. If we fail to
carry out our key business initiatives, then we may fail as a business.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

10. IF WE FAIL TO PROTECT OUR PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY, THEN OUR COMPETITIVE
POSITION WILL BE IMPAIRED.

Our success will depend in part on our ability to obtain additional United
States and foreign patent protection for our products and lighting solutions,
preserve our trade secrets and operate without infringing the proprietary rights
of others. We place considerable importance on obtaining patent protection for
significant new technologies, products and lighting solutions. Legal standards
relating to the validity of trademarks and patents covering products and
inventions and the scope of claims made under such patents are still developing.
Past enforcement of intellectual property rights in many foreign countries has
been limited or nonexistent. Future enforcement of patents and proprietary
rights in many other countries may be problematic or is unpredictable. Moreover,
the issuance of a patent in one country does not assure the issuance of a
similar patent in another country. Claim interpretation and infringement laws
vary by nation, so the extent of any patent protection is uncertain and may vary
in different jurisdictions. Our domestic patent position is also highly
uncertain and involves complex legal and factual questions. The applicants or
inventors of subject matter covered by patent applications or patents owned by
us may not have been the first to invent or the first to file patent
applications for such inventions. Existing or future patents owned by us may be
challenged, infringed upon, invalidated, found to be unenforceable or
circumvented by others. Further, any rights we may have under any issued patents
may not provide us with sufficient protection against competitive products or
otherwise cover commercially valuable products or processes. In the event that
we do not obtain legal title to all rights in our patents, then we may not be
able to achieve our business plan and investors could lose part or all of their
investments in our common stock.

11. LITIGATION OR OTHER DISPUTES REGARDING PATENTS AND OTHER PROPRIETARY RIGHTS
MAY BE EXPENSIVE, CAUSE DELAYS IN BRINGING PRODUCTS TO MARKET AND HARM OUR
ABILITY TO OPERATE.

The manufacture, use, marketing or sale of our products may infringe on the
patent or trademark rights of others. If we are unable to avoid infringement of
the patent rights of others, we may be required to seek a license, defend an
infringement action or challenge the validity of the patents in court. Patent
litigation is costly and time consuming. We may not have sufficient resources to
bring these actions to a successful conclusion. In addition, if we do not obtain
a license, develop or obtain non-infringing technology, or fail to successfully
defend an infringement action or have the patents we are alleged to infringe
declared invalid, we may incur substantial money damages and encounter
significant delays in bringing our products and technology to market.

In addition, if another party claims the same subject matter or subject
matter overlapping with the subject matter that we have claimed in a United
States patent application or patent, we may decide or be required to participate
in interference proceedings in the United States Patent and Trademark Office in
order to determine the priority of invention. Loss of such an interference
proceeding would deprive us of patent protection sought or previously obtained
and could prevent us from commercializing our products. Participation in such
proceedings could result in substantial costs, whether or not the eventual
outcome is favorable to us. These additional costs could adversely affect our
financial results.

12. CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS WITH EMPLOYEES AND OTHERS MAY NOT ADEQUATELY
PREVENT DISCLOSURE OF TRADE SECRETS AND OTHER PROPRIETARY INFORMATION.

In order to protect our proprietary technology and trade secrets, we also
rely in part on confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants,
customers, dealers, distributors, suppliers and advisors. These agreements may
not effectively prevent disclosure of confidential information and may not
provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of
confidential information. In addition, others may independently discover trade
secrets and proprietary information. Costly and time-consuming litigation could
be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights and
failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection could adversely affect our
competitive business position.

RISKS RELATED TO AN INVESTMENT IN OUR SECURITIES

13. BECAUSE ONE OF OUR SHAREHOLDERS OWNS 4,823,224 SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK
AND ALL OF OUR SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK AND VOTING CONTROL OVER AT LEAST
51% OF ELIGIBLE VOTES, HE CAN EXERT SIGNIFICANT INFLUENCE OVER CORPORATE
DECISIONS THAT MAY BE DISADVANTAGEOUS TO OUR MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS.

Mr. George Adams, Sr. owns 4,823,224 shares of our common stock and all of
our Series A Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock owned by Mr. Adams
insures that, when all of his Series A Preferred Stock is voted together with
Mr. Adams' common stock, so long as he owns 3,200,000 shares of our common
stock, he will have the equivalent of 51% of all eligible votes on matters
brought up for vote of shareholders related to the election of our directors and
for any acquisition or merger transaction involving the Company. Such control by
Mr. Adams could be disadvantageous to our minority shareholders, who would have
little say in the election of our directors and in any acquisition or merger
transaction in which we may become involved. See "Description of Securities --
Preferred Stock -- Voting Rights."

14. OUR COMMON STOCK IS CURRENTLY QUOTED ON THE OVER-THE-COUNTER BULLETIN
BOARD. OUR COMMON STOCK WILL LIKELY BE CONSIDERED TO BE A "PENNY STOCK"
AND, AS SUCH, THE MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK MAY BE LIMITED BY CERTAIN SEC
RULES APPLICABLE TO PENNY STOCKS.

As long as the price of our common stock remains below $5.00 per share, our
shares of common stock are likely to be subject to certain "penny stock" rules
promulgated by the SEC. Those rules impose certain sales practice requirements
on brokers who sell penny stock to persons other than established customers and
accredited investors (generally, an institution with assets in excess of
$5,000,000 or an individual with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000). For
transactions covered by the penny stock rules, the broker must make a special
suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written
consent to the transaction prior to the sale. Furthermore, the penny stock rules
generally require, among other things, that brokers engaged in secondary trading
of penny stocks provide customers with written disclosure documents, monthly
statements of the market value of penny stocks, disclosure of the bid and asked
prices of penny stocks and disclosure of the compensation to the brokerage firm
and disclosure of the sales person working for the brokerage firm. These rules
and regulations make it more difficult for brokers to sell shares of our common
stock and limit the liquidity of our shares.

15. TRADING IN OUR SECURITIES COULD BE SUBJECT TO EXTREME PRICE FLUCTUATIONS
THAT COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT YOUR INVESTMENT.

Historically speaking, the market prices for securities of small publicly
traded companies have been highly volatile. Publicized events and announcements
may have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock.

In addition, the stock market from time to time experiences extreme price
and volume fluctuations that particularly affect the market prices for small
publicly traded companies and which are often unrelated to the operating
performance of the affected companies.

16. SUBSTANTIAL SALES OF OUR COMMON STOCK MAY IMPACT THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR
COMMON STOCK.

Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock, including shares
that we may issue upon exercise of options and warrants, and the resale of
shares by investors who have registration rights, could adversely affect the
market price of our common stock. Furthermore, if we raise additional funds
through the issuance of common stock or securities convertible into our common
stock, the percentage ownership of our shareholders will be reduced and the
price of our common stock may fall.

17. WE DO NOT EXPECT TO PAY DIVIDENDS FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.

We will use any earnings generated from our operations to finance our
business and will not pay any cash dividends to our shareholders in the
foreseeable future.

18. ISSUING PREFERRED STOCK WITH RIGHTS SENIOR TO THOSE OF OUR COMMON STOCK
COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK.

Our charter documents grant our board of directors the authority to issue
various series of preferred stock without a vote or action by our shareholders.
Our board also has the authority to determine the terms of preferred stock,
including price, preferences and voting rights. The rights granted to holders of
preferred stock may adversely affect the rights of holders of our common stock.
For example, a series of preferred stock may be granted the right to receive a
liquidation preference - a pre-set distribution in the event of a liquidation
that would reduce the amount available for distribution to holders of our common
stock. In addition, the issuance of preferred stock could make it more difficult
for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. As a
result, common shareholders could be prevented from participating in
transactions that would offer an optimal price for their shares. We have issued
1,000,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock in exchange for certain assets
acquired for use in our business. The holder of the Series A Preferred Stock has
certain super-voting rights that enable the holder to control the outcome of all
shareholder votes related to the election of directors and for any acquisition
or merger transaction in which we may become involved while the Series A
Preferred Stock is outstanding. See "Description of Securities--Preferred
Stock."

19. WE MAY BE EXPOSED TO POTENTIAL RISKS RESULTING FROM NEW REQUIREMENTS UNDER
SECTION 404 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required,
beginning with our fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, to include in our annual
report our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of the end of 2010 and each year thereafter. Furthermore,
our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to attest to
whether our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over
financial reporting is fairly stated in all material respects and separately
report on whether it believes we have maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011.

We do not have a sufficient number of employees to segregate
responsibilities and may be unable to afford increasing our staff or engaging
outside consultants or professionals to overcome our lack of employees. We have
not yet begun our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting and expect to incur additional expenses and diversion of
management's time as a result of performing the system and process evaluation,
testing and remediation required in order to comply with the management
certification and auditor attestation requirements. Further, implementing any
appropriate changes to our internal controls may distract our officers and
employees, entail substantial costs to modify our existing processes and take a
significant amount of time to complete. Also, during the course of our testing,
we may identify other deficiencies that we may not be able to remediate in time
to meet the deadline imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for compliance with the
requirements of Section 404.

In addition, if we fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our
internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from
time to time, we may not be able to insure that we can conclude on an ongoing
basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in
accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Moreover, effective
internal controls, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are
necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to help
prevent financial fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or
prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors
could lose confidence in our reported financial information and the trading
price of our common stock, if a market ever develops, could drop significantly.

20. WE ARE SUBJECT TO THE PERIODIC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 WHICH WILL REQUIRE US TO INCUR AUDIT FEES AND LEGAL
FEES IN CONNECTION WITH THE PREPARATION OF SUCH REPORTS. THESE COSTS COULD
REDUCE OR ELIMINATE OUR ABILITY TO EARN A PROFIT.

We are required to file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder. In order to comply with these regulations,
our independent registered public accounting firm must review our financial
statements on a quarterly basis and audit our financial statements on an annual
basis. Moreover, our legal counsel has to review and assist in the preparation
of such reports. The costs charged by these professionals for such services
cannot be accurately predicted at this time because of factors such as the
number and type of transactions that we engage in and the complexity of our
reports cannot be determined at this time and will have a major effect on the
amount of time to be spent by our auditors and attorneys.

However, the incurrence of such costs will obviously be an expense to our
future operations and could have a negative effect on our ability to meet our
overhead requirements and earn a profit. We may be exposed to potential risks
resulting from new requirements under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our
business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence
in our reported financial information and the trading price of our common stock
could drop significantly.

21. HAVING ONLY TWO DIRECTORS LIMITS OUR ABILITY TO ESTABLISH EFFECTIVE
INDEPENDENT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PROCEDURES AND INCREASES THE CONTROL OF
OUR MANAGEMENT.

Having only two directors, one of whom is our President and another one of
whom is our Corporate Secretary, limits our ability to establish effective
independent corporate governance procedures and increases the control of our
management. Accordingly, we cannot establish board committees comprised of
independent members to oversee functions like compensation or audit issues until
we are able to expand our board of directors to include independent directors.

Until we have a larger board of directors that would include some
independent members, if ever, there will be limited oversight of our
management's decisions and activities and little ability for minority
shareholders to challenge or reverse those activities and decisions, even if
they are not in the best interests of minority shareholders.

22. SHAREHOLDERS MAY BE DILUTED SIGNIFICANTLY THROUGH OUR EFFORTS TO OBTAIN
FINANCING AND SATISFY OBLIGATIONS THROUGH ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL SHARES OF
OUR COMMON STOCK.

We have no committed source of financing. Wherever possible, our board of
directors will attempt to use non-cash consideration to satisfy obligations. In
many instances, we believe that the non-cash consideration will consist of
restricted shares of our common stock. Our board of directors has authority,
without action or vote of the shareholders, to issue all or part of the
35,692,433 authorized, but unissued, shares of our common stock. Future
issuances of shares of our common stock will result in dilution of the ownership
interests of existing shareholders, may further dilute common stock book value
and that dilution may be material.

23. OUR ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION PROVIDE FOR INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND
DIRECTORS AT OUR EXPENSE AND LIMIT THEIR LIABILITY, WHICH MAY RESULT IN A
MAJOR COST TO US AND HURT THE INTERESTS OF OUR SHAREHOLDERS BECAUSE
CORPORATE RESOURCES MAY BE EXPENDED FOR THE BENEFITS OF OFFICERS AND/OR
DIRECTORS.

Our articles of incorporation and applicable Nevada laws provide for the
indemnification of our directors, officers, employees and agents under certain
circumstances, against attorney's fees and other expenses incurred by them in
any litigation to which they become a party arising from their association with
or activities on our behalf. We will also bear the expenses of such litigation
for any of our directors, officers, employees or agents, upon such person's
written promise to repay us therefor, even if it is ultimately determined that
any such person shall not have been entitled to indemnification. This
indemnification policy could result in substantial expenditures by us that we
may be unable to recoup.

We have been advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, indemnification for liabilities arising under federal securities
laws is against public policy and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event
that a claim for indemnification for liabilities arising under federal
securities laws, other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by a
director, officer or controlling person in the successful defense of any action,
suit or proceeding, is asserted by a director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, we will (unless in the opinion
of our counsel, the matter has been settled by controlling precedent) submit to
a court of appropriate jurisdiction, the question of whether indemnification by
us is against public policy as expressed by the Securities and Exchange
Commission and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. The
legal process relating to this matter, if it were to occur, is likely to be very
costly and may result is us receiving negative publicity, either of which
factors is likely to materially reduce the market price for our shares, if such
a market ever develops.

24. ALL 966,049 SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK BEING REGISTERED IN THIS OFFERING
MAY BE SOLD BY SELLING SHAREHOLDERS SUBSEQUENT TO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF OUR
REGISTRATION STATEMENT, OF WHICH THIS PROSPECTUS IS A PART. A SIGNIFICANT
VOLUME OF SALES OF THESE SHARES OVER A SHORT OR CONCENTRATED PERIOD OF TIME
IS LIKELY TO DEPRESS THE MARKET FOR AND PRICE OF OUR SHARES IN ANY MARKET
THAT MAY DEVELOP.

All 966,049 shares of our common stock held by the selling shareholders
that are being registered in this offering may be sold subsequent to the date of
this prospectus, either at once or over a period of time. See also "Selling
Shareholders" and "Plan of Distribution" elsewhere in this prospectus. The
ability to sell these shares of common stock and/or the sale thereof reduces the
likelihood of the establishment and/or maintenance of an orderly trading market
for our shares at any time in the near future.

25. THERE ARE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains certain forward looking statements regarding
management's plans and objectives for future operations including plans and
objectives relating to our planned marketing efforts and future economic
performance. The forward looking statements and associated risks set forth in
this prospectus include or relate to, among other things, (a) our projected
sales and profitability, (b) our growth strategies, (c) anticipated trends in
our industry, (d) our ability to obtain and retain sufficient capital for future
operations and (e) our anticipated needs for working capital. These statements
may be found under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations" and "Description of Business," in this prospectus, as
well as in this prospectus, generally. Actual events or results may differ
materially from those discussed in forward looking statements as a result of
various factors, including, without limitation, the risks outlined under "Risk
Factors" and matters described in this prospectus, generally. In light of these
risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward looking
statements contained in this prospectus will, in fact, occur.

FOR ALL OF THE FOREGOING REASONS AND OTHER REASONS SET FORTH HEREIN, AN
INVESTMENT IN OUR SECURITIES IN ANY MARKET THAT MAY DEVELOP IN THE FUTURE WILL
INVOLVE A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements. These statements
relate to future events or future financial performance and involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause Ciralight Global's
or our industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of
activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the
forward-looking statements.

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology
such as "may," "will," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes,"
"estimates," "predicts," "potential," or the negative of these terms or other
comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or
results may differ materially. Although we believe that the expectations
reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee
future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We are under no
duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this
prospectus to confirm our prior statements to actual results.

Further, this prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve
substantial risks and uncertainties. Such statements include, without
limitation, all statements as to expectation or belief and statements as to our
future results of operations, the progress of any product development, the need
for, and timing of, additional capital and capital expenditures, partnering
prospects, the protection of and the need for additional intellectual property
rights, effects of regulations, the need for additional facilities and potential
market opportunities.

TAX CONSIDERATIONS

We are not providing any tax advice as to the acquisition, holding or
disposition of the common stock offered herein. In making an investment
decision, investors are strongly encouraged to consult their own tax advisors to
determine the U.S. federal, state and any applicable foreign tax consequences
relating to their investment in our common stock.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stock offered
through this prospectus by the selling shareholders. We have agreed to bear the
expenses relating to the registration of the common stock for the selling
shareholders.

DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE

Since our common stock is not listed or quoted on any exchange or quotation
system, the offering price of the shares of common stock was arbitrarily
determined and does not necessarily bear any relationship to our book value,
assets, operating results, financial condition or any other established criteria
of value.

The selling shareholders will sell the shares offered at $.25 per share
until our shares are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and thereafter at
prevailing market prices or privately negotiated prices. Our board of directors
determined the $.25 per share offering price based upon the price of the last
sale of our common stock to investors.

DILUTION

The common stock to be sold by the selling shareholders in this offering is
common stock that is currently issued and outstanding. Accordingly, this
offering will not result in dilution to our existing shareholders.

SELLING SHAREHOLDERS

Between April 30, 2009, and January 15, 2010, the Company issued a total of
5,200,000 restricted shares of common stock at a price of $.25 per share to
investors in a private placement. The selling shareholders purchased their
common stock in our private placement for $.25 per share. The shares issued in
the private placement were issued in reliance on the Regulation D, Rule 506
exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. The shares offered by this prospectus may be offered from time to time
by the selling shareholders listed in the following table. Each selling
shareholders will determine the number of shares to be sold and the timing for
the sales. Our registration of the shares does not necessarily mean that the
selling shareholders will sell all or any of their shares. Because the selling
shareholders may offer all, some or none of their shares, no definitive estimate
as to the number of shares thereof that will be held by the selling shareholders
after such offering can be provided, and the following table has been prepared
on the assumption that all shares of the common stock offered under this
prospectus will ultimately be sold. None of the selling shareholders are FINRA
registered broker-dealers or affiliates of FINRA broker-dealers. No selling
shareholder is an officer or director of the Company.

None of the selling shareholders has had any position, office or other
material relationship with the Company within the past three years and none of
the selling shareholders has any continuing relationship with the Company going
forward.

The Company will file a prospectus supplement to name successors to any
named selling shareholders who are able to use this prospectus to resell their
securities.

Total Shares to
be Offered for
Shares Owned Selling Total Shares to Percentage Owned
Prior to This Shareholder be Owned After Upon Completion of
Name Offering (1) Account (2) This Offering (3) This Offering (4)
---- ------------ ----------- ----------------- -----------------

Kenneth N. Akins 40,000 16,000 24,000 *
Sandra J. Althaus 200,000 80,000 120,000 *
Billy R. Ahlstrom 4,000 4,000 0 *
Mike S. Ahlstrom 50,000 20,000 30,000 *

Rick G. Ahlstrom 6,000 6,000 0 *
Susan E. Atencio 10,000 4,000 6,000 *
D. Joan Balcome 40,000 16,000 24,000 *
Douglas J. Bassett 32,000 12,800 19,200 *
Mark A. Bishop 20,000 8,000 12,000 *
J. Panela P. Broderick Family
Protection Trust (5) 68,000 27,200 40,800 *
Norman E. Butler 16,000 6,400 9,600 *
Shauna H. Carpenter 60,000 24,000 36,000 *
Joseph A. Clem 4,500 4,500 0 *
Steve Cox 25,000 10,000 15,000 *
Mary Lou Cunningham 1,400 1,400 1,200 *
Kathy D'Olimpo 20,000 8,000 12,000 *
Eugene J. Daunis 20,000 8,000 12,000 *
Nancy J. Davis 40,000 16,000 24,000 *
Brett J. Earl 40,000 16,000 24,000 *
Karie Eggleston 12,000 4,800 7,200 *
Richard J. Eisenreich 200,000 80,000 120,000 *
Garrett Emery 8,000 3,200 4,800 *
Cory Ericksen 10,000 4,000 6,000 *
Cyndi Feller 6,000 6,000 0 *
Hans Fuegi 20,000 8,000 12,000 *
Craig Fullmer 12,000 4,800 7,200 *
Bonita L. Greiner 20,000 8,000 12,000 *
Russell K. Groves 20,000 8,000 12,000 *
Robert W. Halverson 20,000 8,000 12,000 *
Jerry L. Hamblin 50,000 20,000 30,000 *
Bruce r. Hebdon 40,000 16,000 24,000 *
Charles C. Hislop 16,000 6,400 9,600 *
Sheryl A. Hodges 10,000 4,000 6,000 *
Jess Holyoak 10,000 4,000 6,000 *
John C. Jensen 20,000 8,000 12,000 *
John Johnson 4,000 4,000 0 *
Clyde R. Johnson 25,200 10,080 15,120 *
Duane D. Kearsley 2,000 2,000 0 *
Emma P. Kirkham 4,000 4,000 0 *
Laurel Kirkham 24,000 12,048 11,952
Steven S. & Michele L. Maughan (6) 8,000 3,200 4,800 *
Edward Miner 10,000 4,000 6,000 *
Tonya Nemanic 12,000 4,800 7,200 *
Tim Pearson 72,000 28,800 43,200 *
Darwin G. Perry 4,000 4,000 0 *
L. Val Rollins 98,000 39,200 58,800 *
Bart A. Schroder 50,000 20,000 30,000 *
Rick Shapiro 4,000 4,000 0 *
Val S. Simmons 8,000 3,200 4,800 *
Arthur Lyn Simon & Helen I. Simon, JTWROS (7) 112,000 44,800 67,200 *
Mary Jo Truman Stallcup 40,000 16,000 24,000 *
Joshua Taylor 16,000 6,400 9,600 *
Tew Investments, LLC (8) 40,000 16,000 24,000 *
Randall K. Thunell 4,000 4,000 0 *
Bryce Tolman 180,000 72,000 108,000 *
Jeffrey Walters 80,000 32,000 48,000 *
Thaes Webb III 20,000 8,000 12,000 *
Adam Wells 21,052 8,421 12,631 *
M. Dunford Weston Family Partnership (9) 132,080 52,832 79,248 *
Zoe Anne Watson 23,920 9,568 14,352 *
John Williamson 148,000 59,200 88,800 *
Kent A. Winegar 20,000 8,000 12,000 *
Sarah L. Wood Rodriquez 4,000 4,000 0 *

----------
* Less than one percent (1%).

1. For purposes of this column only, we have included all shares of common
stock owned of record or beneficially owned by the respective selling
shareholders. Each selling shareholder's ownership in this column is based
on 14,292,567 shares of our common stock outstanding as of November 20,
2011.

2. Represents an aggregate of 966,049 shares of outstanding common stock.
3. Assumes that all securities registered will be sold.

4. The percentages set forth in this column are based on 14,292,567 shares of
common stock outstanding as of November 20, 2011. The number and percentage
of shares beneficially owned is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information is not necessarily
indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rule,
beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the selling security
holder has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any
shares, which the selling security holder has the right to acquire within
60 days.

5. David Broderick is the Trustee of this Trust and has sole voting and
investment power over these shares.
6. Steven S. Maughan and Michele L. Maughan have shared voting and investment
control over these shares.
7. Arthur Lyn Simon and Helen I. Simon have shared voting and investment
control over these shares.
8. Wayne Tew is the majority member and manager of Tew Investments, LLC and he
has sole voting and investment power over these shares.
9. Michael D. Weston is the managing partner of this partnership and has sole
voting and investment power over these shares.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

None of the selling shareholders are FINRA registered broker-dealers or
affiliates of FINRA broker-dealers. The selling shareholders may offer the
common stock at various times in one or more of the following transactions:

* on any market that might develop;
* in transactions other than market transactions;
* by pledge to secure debts or other obligations;
* purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the
broker-dealer for its account; or
* in a combination of any of the above.

Our shares of common stock offered hereby by the selling shareholders may
be sold from time to time by such shareholders, or by their pledgees, donees,
transferees and other successors in interest thereto. These pledgees, donees,
transferees and other successors in interest will also be deemed "selling
shareholders" for the purposes of this prospectus.

The selling shareholders will sell at a fixed price of $.25 per share until
our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and thereafter at
prevailing market prices or at privately negotiated prices. In order to comply
with the securities laws of certain states, if applicable, the shares may be
sold only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers.

The selling shareholders may use broker-dealers to sell shares. If this
happens, broker-dealers will either receive discounts or commissions from the
selling shareholders, or they will receive commissions from purchasers of shares

from whom they have acted as agents. To date, no discussions have been held or
agreements reached with any broker-dealer.

The selling shareholders shall have the sole and absolute discretion not to
accept any purchase offer or make any sale of shares if they deem the purchase
price to be unsatisfactory at any particular time.

The selling shareholders or their respective pledgees, donees, transferees
or other successors in interest, may also sell the shares directly to market
makers acting as principals and/or broker-dealers acting as agents for
themselves or their customers. Such broker-dealers may receive compensation in
the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling shareholders
and/or the purchasers of shares for whom such broker-dealer may act as agents or
to whom they sell as principal or both, which compensation as to a particular
broker-dealer might be in excess of customary commissions. Market makers and
block purchasers purchasing the shares will do so for their own account and at
their own risk. It is possible that a selling shareholder will attempt to sell
shares of common stock in block transactions to market makers or other
purchasers at a price per share which may be below the then market price. The
selling shareholders cannot assure that all or any of the shares offered in this
prospectus will be sold by the selling shareholders.

The selling shareholders, alternatively, may sell all or part of the shares
offered in this prospectus through an underwriter. No selling shareholder has
entered into any agreement with a prospective underwriter and there is no
assurance that any such agreement will be entered into by a selling shareholder.
In the event that a selling shareholder sells all or part of the shares offered
in this prospectus through an underwriter, the maximum compensation paid to any
such underwriter shall be 8% and shall be paid by such selling shareholder.

Selling shareholders and any purchasers of our securities should be aware
that any market that develops in our common stock will be subject to "penny
stock" restrictions.

We will pay all expenses incident to the registration, offering and sale of
the common stock other than commissions or discounts of underwriters,
broker-dealers or agents.

The selling shareholders must comply with the requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in the offer and
sale of the common stock. In particular, during such times as the selling
shareholders may be deemed to be engaged in a distribution of the common stock,
and, therefore, be considered to be an underwriter, they must comply with
applicable law and we have informed them that they may not, among other things:

1. engage in any stabilization activities in connection with the shares;
2. effect any sale or distribution of the shares until after the
prospectus shall have been appropriately amended or supplemented, if
required, to describe the terms of the sale or distribution; and
3. bid for or purchase any of the shares or rights to acquire the shares
or attempt to induce any person to purchase any of the shares or
rights to acquire the shares, other than as permitted under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The offering will conclude when all of the 966,049 shares of common stock
have been sold or we, in our sole discretion, decide to terminate the
registration of the shares.

SELLING SHAREHOLDERS AND ANY PURCHASERS OF OUR SECURITIES SHOULD BE AWARE
THAT THE MARKET IN OUR STOCK WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE PENNY STOCK RESTRICTIONS.

The trading of our securities takes place in the over-the-counter markets,
which are commonly referred to as the OTCBB as maintained by FINRA. As a result,
an investor may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate
quotations as to the price of, our securities.

OTCBB CONSIDERATIONS

The OTCBB is separate and distinct from the NASDAQ stock market. NASDAQ has
no business relationship with issuers of securities quoted on the OTCBB. The
SEC's order handling rules, which apply to NASDAQ-listed securities, do not
apply to securities quoted on the OTCBB.

Although the NASDAQ stock market has rigorous listing standards to ensure
the high quality of its issuers and can delist issuers for not meeting those
standards, the OTCBB has no listing standards. Rather, it is the market maker
who chooses to quote a security on the system, files the application and is
obligated to comply with keeping information about the issuer in its files.
FINRA cannot deny an application by a market maker to quote the stock of a
company assuming all FINRA questions relating to its Rule 211 process are
answered accurately and satisfactorily. The only requirement for ongoing
inclusion in the OTCBB is that the issuer be current in its reporting
requirements with the SEC.

Investors may have difficulty in getting orders filled because trading
activity on the OTCBB in general is not conducted as efficiently and effectively
as with NASDAQ-listed securities. As a result, investors' orders may be filled
at prices much different than expected when orders are placed.

Investors must contact a broker-dealer to trade OTCBB securities. Investors
do not have direct access to the bulletin board service. For bulletin board
securities, there only has to be one market maker.

OTCBB transactions are conducted almost entirely on a manual basis. Because
there are no automated systems for negotiating trades on the OTCBB, they are
conducted via telephone. In times of heavy market volume, the limitations of
this process may result in a significant increase in the time it takes to
execute investor orders. Therefore, when investors place market orders-- an
order to buy or sell a specific number of shares at the current market price--
it is possible for the prices of a stock to go up or down significantly during
the lapse of time between placing a market order and getting execution.

Because OTCBB stocks are usually not followed by analysts, there may be
lower trading volume than for NASDAQ-listed securities.

SECTION 15(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Our shares are covered by Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rules 15g-1 through 15g-6 promulgated thereunder,
which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell
our securities to persons other that established customers and accredited
investors (generally institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or
individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding
$200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouses).

Rule 15g-1 exempts a number of specific transactions from the scope of the
penny stock rules (but is not applicable to us).

Rule 15g-2 declares unlawful broker-dealer transactions in penny stocks
unless the broker-dealer has first provided to the customer a standardized
disclosure document.

Rule 15g-3 provides that it is unlawful for a broker-dealer to engage in a
penny stock transaction unless the broker-dealer first discloses and
subsequently confirms to its customers current quotation prices or similar
market information concerning the penny stock in question.

Rule 15g-4 prohibits broker-dealers from completing penny stock
transactions for a customer unless the broker-dealer first discloses to the
customer the amount of compensation or other remuneration received as a result
of the penny stock transaction.

Rule 15g-5 requires that a broker-dealer executing a penny stock
transaction, other than one exempt under Rule 15g-1, disclose to its customer,
at the time of or prior to the transaction, information about the sales person's
compensation and the compensation of any associated person of the broker-dealer.

Rule 15g-6 requires broker-dealers selling penny stocks to provide their
customers with monthly account statements.

Rule 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act establishes the definition of a "penny
stock" for purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a minimum
bid price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to a limited number of
exceptions. It is likely that our shares will be considered to be penny stocks
for the immediately foreseeable future. For any transaction involving a penny
stock, unless exempt, the penny stock rules require that a broker or dealer
approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks and the broker or
dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction setting
forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks,
the broker or dealer must obtain financial information and investment experience
and objectives of the person and make a reasonable determination that the
transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and that that person
has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of
evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny
stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock
market, which, in highlight form, sets forth:

* the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability
determination; and
* that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from
the investor prior to the transaction.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks
in both public offerings and in secondary trading and commissions payable to
both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for
the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of
fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent
disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and
information on the limited market in penny stocks.

In addition, FINRA has recently imposed strict guidelines on deposited
securities which are having a chilling effect on clearing houses and
broker-dealers who accept physical delivery of stock certificates, resulting in
(i) special fees charged to customers when stock certificates are deposited into
their brokerage accounts and (ii) substantial delays in clearing the underlying
securities for resale.

The above-referenced requirements may create a lack of liquidity, making
trading difficult or impossible, and accordingly, shareholders may find it
difficult to dispose of our shares.

STATE SECURITIES-BLUE SKY LAWS

There is no established public market for our common stock and there can be
no assurances that any market will develop in the foreseeable future. Transfer
of our common stock may also be restricted under the securities laws or
securities regulations promulgated by various states, commonly referred to as
"blue sky" laws. Absent compliance with such individual state laws, our common
stock may not be traded in such jurisdiction. Because the common stock
registered hereunder has not been registered for resale under blue sky laws of
every state, the holders of such shares and persons who desire to purchase them
in any trading market that might develop in the future, should be aware that
there may be significant state blue sky law restrictions upon the ability of
investors to sell the common stock and of purchasers to purchase the common
stock. Accordingly, investors may not be able to liquidate their investments and
should be prepared to hold the common stock for an indefinite period of time.

Selling shareholders may contact us directly to ascertain procedures
necessary for compliance with blue sky laws in the applicable states relating to
sellers and/or purchasers of shares of our common stock.

We are listed in Mergent, Inc., a leading provider of business and
financial information on publicly listed and quoted companies, which, once
published, will provide Ciralight Global with "manual" exemptions in
approximately 39 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico and U.S.
Virgin Islands, as indicated in CCH Blue Sky Law Desk Reference at Section 6301
entitled "STANDARD MANUALS EXEMPTIONS."

Thirty-nine states, certain U.S. Territories (Guam, Puerto Rico and U.S.
Virgin Islands) and the District of Columbia have what is commonly referred to
as a "manual exemption" for secondary trading of securities such as those to be
resold by selling shareholders under this prospectus. In these states,
territories and district, so long as we obtain and maintain a listing in
Mergent, Inc. or Standard and Poor's Corporate Manual, secondary trading of our
common stock can occur without filing, review or approval by state regulatory
authorities in these states, territories and district. These 39 states are:
Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii,
Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan,
Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey,
New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island,
South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia,
Wisconsin and Wyoming. Secondary trading can occur in these states without
further action.

We currently do not intend to and may not be able to qualify securities for
resale in other states which require shares to be qualified before they can
resold by our shareholders.

LIMITATIONS IMPOSED BY REGULATION M

Under applicable rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, any person
engaged in the distribution of the shares may not simultaneously engage in
market making activities with respect to our common stock for a period of two
business days prior to the commencement of such distribution. In addition and
without limiting the foregoing, each selling shareholder will be subject to
applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the associated rules and
regulations thereunder, including, without limitation Regulation M, which
provisions may limit the timing of purchases and sales of shares of our common
stock by the selling shareholders. We will make copies of this prospectus
available to the selling shareholders and have informed them of the need for
delivery of copies of this prospectus to purchasers at or prior to the time of
any sale of the shares offered hereby. We assume no obligation to so deliver
copies of this prospectus or any related prospectus supplement.

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

As of November 20, 2011, we had 14,292,567 shares of common stock and
1,000,000 shares of Series A preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Our common stock is currently quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board
and our shares are thinly traded. There can be no assurance that a public
trading market can be sustained in the future. Without an active public trading
market, investors in this offering may be unable to liquidate their shares of
our common stock without considerable delay, if at all. If a trading market for
our common stock is sustained, the price for our shares may be highly volatile
and may bear no relationship to our actual financial condition or results of
operations. Factors we discuss in this prospectus, including the many risks
factors associated with an investment in Ciralight Global, may have a
significant impact on the market price of our common stock. Also, because of the
relatively low price at which our common stock will likely trade, many brokerage
firms may not effect transactions in our common stock.

HOLDERS

As of November 20, 2011 there were approximately 161 shareholders of record
of our common stock and one holder of record of our Series A Preferred Stock.

DIVIDENDS

We have not paid cash dividends on any class of common equity since
formation and we do not anticipate paying any dividends on our outstanding
common stock in the foreseeable future. There are no material restrictions
limiting or that are likely to limit our ability to pay dividends on its
outstanding securities.

RULE 144 SHARES

As of the date of this prospectus, 6,328,184 shares of our common stock
(excluding the 966,049 shares registered in this offering) are currently
available for sale to the public in accordance with the volume and trading
limitations of Rule 144.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

OUR CAPITALIZATION:

COMMON STOCK

We are authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of common stock, $.001 par
value per share. We currently have 14,292,567 shares of our common stock issued
and outstanding.

The holders of our common stock:

* have equal ratable rights to dividends from funds legally available
for payment of dividends when, as and if declared by the board of the
directors;
* are entitled to share ratably in all of the assets available for
distribution to holders of common stock upon liquidation, dissolution
or winding up our affairs;
* do not have preemptive, subscription or conversion rights, or
redemption rights or access to any sinking fund; and
* are entitled to one non-cumulative vote per share on all matters
submitted to shareholders for a vote at any meeting of shareholders.

PREFERRED STOCK

We are authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.001 per share. Currently, we have 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock issued
and outstanding. As part of the purchase contract for the acquisition of assets,
we issued 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to the seller of those
assets, Mr. George Adams, Sr. The Series A Preferred Stock has the following
rights and preferences:

Shares Issued: 1,000,000 shares have been issued to George Adams, Sr. So
long as the Series A Preferred Stock remains issued and outstanding, no other
shares of preferred stock shall be issued by the Company that would grant the
holder(s) equal or superior rights to the Series A Preferred Stock.

Voting Rights: As long as Mr. Adams or his assignee owns 1,000,000 shares
of our Series A Preferred Stock and at least 3,200,000 shares of our common
stock, such holder shall have the right to vote 51% of the votes necessary for
the election of directors and for any acquisition or merger transaction. It is
our position that if Mr. Adams or his assignee does not meet both ownership
thresholds (i.e., (1) owns all 1,000,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock
and (2) owns at least 3,200,000 shares of our common stock, then Mr. Adams or
his assignee can only vote the number of shares of common stock owned and no
super-majority voting rights exist."

Redemption Rights: The Company will have the right, but not the obligation,
to redeem shares of the Series A Preferred Stock by paying Mr. Adams $1.00 per
share. Such redemption may occur any time the Company has money legally
available for such redemption.

Dividend Rights: None

Our board of directors may issue one or more series of preferred stock. If
we decide to issue any additional preferred stock in the future, our board of
directors will determine the number of shares and the rights, preferences and
limitations of each series. These rights, preferences and limitations may
include specific designations, number of shares, dividend, liquidation,
redemption and voting rights. However, as long as the Series A Preferred Stock
is outstanding, we will not be able to issue additional preferred stock with
rights and preferences equal to or greater than those granted to the Series A
Preferred Stock.

WARRANTS AND OPTIONS

We have no outstanding warrants. We have 74,400 outstanding stock options
held by a non-affiliate. These options are exercisable at a price of $.75 per
share and expire on December 31, 2014, or one year after the Company's common
stock is publicly traded.

On December 30, 2010, the Company's Board of Directors approved and adopted
the Company's 2010 Employee and Consultant Stock Incentive Plan ("Plan") and
reserved a total of 800,000 shares of common stock for issuance pursuant to the
Plan. The purpose of the Plan is to provide incentives to attract, retain and
motivate eligible persons whose present and potential contributions are
important to the success of the Company by offering them an opportunity to
participate in the Company's future performance through awards of Options,
Restricted Stock and Stock Bonuses. As of the date of this prospectus, 680,900
Options had been granted under the Plan at an exercise price of $.425 per share.

In April 2011, in consideration of George Adams, Sr. and his family
("Adams") agreeing to extend a $300,000 line of credit to the Company, the
Company agreed to grant Adams up to 300,000 stock options based on the amount of
the line advanced, at an exercise price of $.50 per share, exercisable over five
years. (thus far we only drawn down $200,000 of the line of credit).

REGISTRATION RIGHTS

We have not granted registration rights to the selling shareholders or to
any other person.

REPORTS TO SHAREHOLDERS

We intend to furnish our shareholders with annual reports that will
describe the nature and scope of our business and operations for the prior year
and will contain a copy of our audited financial statements for our most recent
fiscal year.

LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Article 9 of the Company's Articles of Incorporation provides that our
directors and officers shall not be personally liable to the Company or our
stockholders for damages for breach of fiduciary duty. However, Article 9 does
not eliminate or limit the liability of a director or officer for (1) acts or
omissions which involve intentional misconduct, fraud or knowing violation of
law or (2) the unlawful payment of dividends.

INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Article 10 of the Company's Articles of Incorporation entitle any present
and future director or executive officer to be indemnified and held harmless
from any action, suite or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative, by reason of the fact that he, or a person of whom he is the
legal representative, is or was a director or officer of the corporation, to the
fullest extent legally permissible under the laws of the State of Nevada.

has been made that the officer, director, employee, or agent acted in good faith
and in a manner, which such person believed to be in the best interests of the
corporation. A determination may be made by the shareholders; by a majority of
the directors who were not parties to the action, suit, or proceeding confirmed
by opinion of independent legal counsel; or by opinion of independent legal
counsel in the event a quorum of directors who were not a party to such action,
suit, or proceeding does not exist.

The expenses of officers and directors incurred in defending a civil or
criminal action, suit or proceeding must be paid by us as they are incurred and
in advance of the final disposition of the action, suit or proceeding, if and
only if the officer or director undertakes to repay said expenses to us if it is
ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that he is not
entitled to be indemnified by us.

The indemnification and advancement of expenses may not be made to or on
behalf of any officer or director if a final adjudication establishes that the
officer's or director's acts or omission involved intentional misconduct, fraud
or a knowing violation of the law and was material to the cause of action.

Article 10 of the our Articles of Incorporation and Article VII of our
By-Laws entitle any director or executive officer to be indemnified and held
harmless from any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he, or a person of
whom he is the legal representative, is or was a director or officer of the
corporation, to the fullest extent legally permissible under the laws of the
State of Nevada.

The Nevada Revised Statutes allow a company to indemnify our officers,
directors, employees, and agents from any threatened, pending, or completed
action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or
investigative, except under certain circumstances. Indemnification may only
occur if a determination has been made that the officer, director, employee, or
agent acted in good faith and in a manner, which such person believed to be in
the best interests of the corporation. A determination may be made by the
stockholders; by a majority of the directors who were not parties to the action,
suit, or proceeding confirmed by opinion of independent legal counsel; or by
opinion of independent legal counsel in the event a quorum of directors who were
not a party to such action, suit, or proceeding does not exist.

AUTHORIZED BUT UNISSUED CAPITAL STOCK

Nevada law does not require shareholder approval for any issuance of
authorized shares. However, the marketplace rules of the NASDAQ, which would
apply only if our common stock were ever listed on the NASDAQ, which is unlikely
for the foreseeable future, require shareholders approval of certain issuances
of common stock equal to or exceeding 20% of the then outstanding voting power
or then outstanding number of shares of common stock, including in connection
with a change of control of Ciralight, the acquisition of the stock or assets of
another company or the sale or issuance of common stock below the book or market
value price of such stock. These additional shares may be used for a variety of
corporate purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional
capital or to facilitate corporate acquisitions.

One of the effects of the existence of unissued and unreserved common stock
may be to enable our board of directors to issue shares to persons friendly to
current management, which issuance could render more difficult or discourage an
attempt to obtain control of our board by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy
contest or otherwise, and thereby protect the continuity and entrenchment of our
management and possibly deprive the shareholders of opportunities to sell their
shares of our common stock at prices higher then prevailing market prices.

SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

As an issuer of "penny stock," the protection provided by the federal
securities laws relating to forward-looking statements does not apply to us if
our shares are considered to be penny stocks. Although the federal securities
laws provide a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by a public
company that files reports under the federal securities laws, this safe harbor
is not available to issuers of penny stocks. As a result, we will not have the
benefit of this safe harbor protection in the event of any claim that the
material provided by us, including this prospectus, contained a material

misstatement of fact or was misleading in any material respect because of our
failure to include any statements necessary to make the statements not
misleading.

INTERESTS OF NAMED EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

Except for David E. Wise, Esq., no expert or counsel named in this
prospectus as having prepared or certified any part of this prospectus or having
given an opinion upon the validity of the securities being registered or upon
other legal matters in connection with the registration or offering of the
common stock was employed on a contingency basis, or had, or is to receive, in
connection with the offering, a substantial interest, direct or indirect, in the
registrant. Nor was any such person connected with the registrant as a promoter,
managing or principal underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer or
employee. David E. Wise, Esq., our securities counsel, owns 310,558 shares of
our common stock. Mr. Wise acquired 240,000 shares in April 2009 for an
aggregate purchase price of $330 in exchange for legal services rendered. As a
result of such purchase price, Mr. Wise may be deemed to be a founder of the
Company. Mr. Wise acquired an additional 70,588 shares of common stock in
January 2010 for an aggregate purchase price of $17,647 ($.25 per share) in
exchange for legal services rendered. The shares issued to Mr. Wise were not
issued on a contingency basis. In addition, Mr. Wise owns a 50% equity interest
in one of our dealers, Chaparral Green Energy Solutions, LLC. See "Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions."

LEGAL REPRESENTATION

The validity of the common stock offered by this prospectus was passed upon
for us by David E. Wise, Esq., Attorney at Law, San Antonio, Texas.

EXPERTS

Our financial statements as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the year
ended December 31, 2010 and for the period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2009, along with the financial statements of Ciralight, Inc (Old
Ciralight) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the years then ended,
included in this prospectus have been audited by independent registered public
accountants and have been so included in reliance upon the reports of HJ
Associates & Consultants, LLP given on the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.

TRANSFER AGENT

Our transfer agent is Transfer Online, Inc. Their address is 317 SW Alder
Street, 2nd Floor, Portland, Oregon 97204. Their telephone number is (503)
227-2950 and their facsimile number is (503) 227-6874.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

CORPORATE BACKGROUND

We were incorporated in the state of Nevada on February 26, 2009, under the
name "Ciralight West, Inc." On March 13, 2009, we changed our name to Ciralight
Global, Inc. As a result of the acquisition described below, we are a
manufacturer and wholesaler of "advanced skylights" for use in warehouses,
schools, retail stores, airports and military installations.

On January 27, 2009, Old Ciralight granted Mr. George Adams, Sr., its only
secured creditor, the right to (i) manufacture the Old Ciralight product on an
exclusive basis and unconditionally and (ii) market and sell its product, and
agreed to ship all of its inventory to a facility owned or controlled by Mr.
Adams in Anaheim, California. For all intents and purposes, Old Ciralight ceased
its operations on January 27, 2009.

Mr. Adams began working with the people who would become the management and
principals of Ciralight Global, Inc. during February 2009 and such management
incorporated Ciralight Global, Inc. on February 26, 2009. The original plan
between Mr. Adams and Ciralight Global, Inc. was for Ciralight Global, Inc. to
handle sales, manufacturing, marketing and fulfillment of Ciralight products on
behalf of Mr. Adams. So, Ciralight Global, Inc. immediately began manufacturing
the Suntracker One(TM) products, leased warehouse space, negotiated with
suppliers for component parts, agreed to repair or replace defective products
that had been previously sold by Old Ciralight and installed by Old Ciralight's
dealers and contractors.

In April 2009, we entered into an Exchange of Stock for Assets Agreement
with Mr. George Adams, Sr. ("Adams Agreement") to acquire certain assets
including, but not limited to, a United States patent, patent applications
pending in Canada, Europe, Mexico and the United States, artwork, trademarks,
equipment, furniture, databases, technical drawings, promotional materials,
trade names and inventory parts and marketing rights related to the Suntracker
One(TM) and Suntracker Two(TM) products previously owned and distributed by
Ciralight, Inc., a Utah corporation, such assets having been foreclosed on by
Mr. Adams, who was the secured creditor of Old Ciralight. We have no
affiliation, contractual or otherwise, with Old Ciralight.

In April 2009, we acquired all of the above described assets from Mr.
Adams, except for the United States patent and the patent applications pending
in Canada, Europe, Mexico and the United States, in exchange for 3,200,000
shares of our common stock and 1,000,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock.
In December 2009, we acquired the United States patent and the patent
applications pending in Canada, Europe, Mexico and the United States from Mr.
Adams in exchange for the issuance by us of an additional 400,000 shares of our
common stock and a convertible promissory note in the amount of $250,000. The
note is convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of one
share per $.25 of outstanding principal and interest. As a result of this
transaction, Mr. Adams is our largest shareholder.

The Adams Agreement also granted Mr. Adams a royalty fee of $20.00 for each
Suntracker One(TM) and Suntracker Two(TM) unit or any future units that are
based on the patent rights we acquired from him. The maximum royalty fees
payable under the Adams Agreement is $2,000,000 based on the sale of 100,000
units. From February 26, 2009 through December 31, 2009, we accrued $15,260 in
royalties due to Mr. Adams related to our sale of 763 units.

Since we acquired the assets from Mr. Adams, we have worked diligently to
improve our brand image and the reputation of our Company and have been very
mindful of the potential impact that the defunct Ciralight, Inc. and Mr. Adams'
foreclosre on it assets could have or has had on the Company. We have worked
very hard to improve the SunTracker One(TM) and SunTracker Two(TM) products by
making them more reliable, more functional and more acceptable to dealers,
distributors and customers. We have developed excellent relationships with our
suppliers and we reached out to the customers who bought skylights from
Ciralight, Inc. (Old Ciralight) that may have malfunctioned and have replaced
parts and components as necessary by allowing such customers to buy replacement
parts and components at our cost. This program of reaching out to those
customers has reaped rewards for the Company as we are now receiving new orders
from some of Old Ciralight's customers. We do not believe that the fact that Old
Ciralight is defunct and has had its assets acquired by its creditors has had
any material impact on us due to our proactive engagement with our suppliers,
some of whom were creditors of Old Ciralight.

WHAT IS OUR BUSINESS?

Our core business is to manufacture for sale advanced skylights known as
Ciralight Suntracker "Smart SkylightsTM" that provide energy saving-low carbon
(co2) and high performance solar powered daylighting to building interiors. We
are an American company in the clean energy technology industry.

Our Ciralight Suntracker Smart Skylights(TM) use sun-tracking GPS
technology attached to mirrors that track the sun throughout the day and bring
high levels of diffused natural light into buildings. Energy saving Ciralight
Suntracker Smart Skylights(TM) allow businesses, governments and schools to
efficiently capture sunlight from a perpetual and free source of light and
energy - the Sun, to illuminate their building interiors through the practice
known as Daylighting.

Using Sun-tracking technology allows our skylights to illuminate building
interiors for longer hours than traditional skylights. Ciralight Suntracker
Smart Skylights(TM) provide the illumination of a 1,000 watt metal halide light
fixture; however, Ciralight Suntrackers are entirely Solar Powered so they do
not require any electricity or electrical hookup. Ciralight Suntrackers are
designed similar to dual pane window with multiple thermal barriers so they
prevent the heat associated with traditional skylights.

The result is a bright, healthy, natural light to building interiors, just
as nature intended; allowing users to shut off their electrical lights during
day time hours for up to 10.5 hours a day. The results are a significant
reduction in energy use and utility costs; as well as higher sales in retail
businesses, increased worker production, and an enhanced overall human
experience.

WHAT IS DAYLIGHTING?

Daylighting is the practice of using natural light to illuminate building
space. Using natural light from the sun to illuminate buildings costs nothing
and the result is a compelling, efficient lighting solution that protects the
environment. By consuming less energy, daylit buildings reduce fossil fuel use
and carbon dioxide emissions associated with global warming and climate change.

In addition to the energy savings resulting from the use of daylighting,
studies show that people thrive in naturally lit environments. Studies show that
shoppers linger longer and buy more in stores that use daylighting. Sales in day
lit stores are on average six percent higher and as high as 40% more than stores
without daylighting. In addition, students learn better in daylight classrooms.
Students in classrooms with advanced daylighting performed 20% higher on test
scores than students in classrooms without daylighting. In the workplace,
business that use daylighting find that workers are more productive, with less
absenteeism, less turnover and higher moral among employees.

The U.S. Department of Energy statistics show that 29% of energy use in
commercial buildings is for lighting. This amount is 40% to 50% in schools. The
Department of Energy projects that electricity consumption between 2010 and 2030
will grow from 14.85 quadrillion BTUs to 20.30 quadrillion BTUs. And despite all
the discussion and focus on renewable energy programs, the Department of Energy
projects consumption of renewable energy will grow from .16 quadrillion BTUs to
only .17 quadrillion BTUs. Therefore, unless there is a significant change in
direction, consumption and dependence on electricity will continue to grow and
this is expected to significantly increase electrical utility costs for
consumers, schools and businesses.

The use of daylighting by consumers, schools and businesses is a way to
decrease their use of electricity and to protect them from rising electricity
costs. According to the Sustainable Building Technical Manual, chapter IV.7,
page 90, a well-designed daylit building is estimated to reduce lighting energy
use from 50% to as much as 80%.

Day lit buildings make a statement about their owners and occupants; they
are socially and fiscally responsible.

ADVANTAGES OF CIRALIGHT SUNTRACKER SMART SKYLIGHTS(TM)

1. Save Energy by shutting of electric lights during daytime hours.
2. Save on Air-Conditioning costs by reducing need to run
Air-Conditioning to offset heat generated from Electric light fixtures
or standard skylights

3. Save on maintenance costs associated with Electric lights.
4. Reduce energy usage during peak hours when rates are higher.
5. Receive certain Federal, State & Local Tax benefits & Utility
incentives as a Green Energy product.

WHAT ARE "ADVANCED SKYLIGHTS?"

Standard skylights are typically either shaped plastic skylights or flat
glass skylights that are open below and provide direct sunlight into the
building space. Standard skylights typically provide the most light when the sun
is high in the sky but are ineffective when the sun is low in the sky, such as
in the morning or late afternoon hours. Standard skylights provide usable light
for a limited number of hours a day and, therefore, provide only limited energy
savings.

Advanced skylights are defined as skylights incorporating technology which
enables optical redirection of sunlight into a building. Advanced skylights use
either "active" or "passive" technology. An advanced skylight with active
technology employs use of moving parts such as rotating mirrors inside the
skylight dome, while advanced skylights with passive technology have no moving
parts and use prismatic materials incorporated into the skylight dome surface.
Active advanced skylights claim better overall daylighting performance by
increasing the number of daylight hours available by tracking and re-directing
the sunlight into buildings even at the extremes of the day when the sun is low
on the horizon. Passive advanced skylights are not able to capture the sunlight
during the extreme hours of the day when the sun is low in the sky.

OUR PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGY

Our Ciralight Suntracker Smart SkylightsTM are classified as Active
Advanced Skylights. Our products are an energy saving, cost saving lighting
solution. We are a Clean Energy Technology Company that manufactures a Green
Energy Saving Product.

After securing the technology of the Suntracker skylights, from Old
Ciralight, we made significant improvements to these Active Advanced Skylights
that improve their quality, durability and functionality. We are now marketing
our advanced daylighting system under the brand name of "Ciralight Suntracker
Smart Skylight(TM)." Our improved design Ciralight Suntracker systems have
successfully passed life cycle test wherein they were subjected to harsh weather
conditions in an environmental chamber for a period equivalent to more than 30
years. The tests showed that our Smart Skylights have a 30 plus year life
expectancy.

As an active and advanced skylight that is solar powered, our Ciralight
Suntrackers entitle users to certain tax benefits and utility company incentives
that are not available to passive skylights. This provides us with a competitive
advantage. Smart Skylights(TM) are completely solar powered and while they are
powered by only a 5 watt solar panel, they provide the illumination of a 1,000
watt metal halide light fixture.

Currently, our Ciralight Suntrackers are offered in the size of 4ft x 4 ft.
We have also released a 4ft x 8ft version of Ciralight Suntracker(TM) that we
believe will be popular for retrofitting existing warehouses and commercial
buildings. Property owners are able to replace their existing traditional less
efficient skylights with our 4ft x 8ft Ciralight Suntracker(TM) for minimal cost
as a means to make their facilities more energy efficient and reduce their
energy costs. During 2011, it is our intention to release a 2ft by 2ft version
of our Ciralight Suntracker(TM) for use in homes. We believe these will be very
popular with homeowners as an energy saving, renewable lighting solution. These
will be also suitable for school classrooms, dorm rooms, military barracks and
hospitals.

We believe our Ciralight Suntracker Smart Skylight(TM) product is unique in
the following ways:

* GPS Controller - Each unit includes a fully self-contained solar
powered Global Positioning System ("GPS") controller that tracks the
position of the sun and insures maximum light.. The use of the GPS
controller and mirrors provide up to three times more light than the
light from standard skylights and allows users to turn off their
electrical lights for up to 10 hours a day.

* Light Diffusion and Thermal Barrier - Each unit includes (i) two
state-of-the-art prismatic lenses that transform the sunlight into
high levels of evenly dispersed and diffused light, and (ii) a dual
panel thermal barrier that prevents the typical heat associated with
standard skylights from entering into the lighted space resulting in
less than one-half the heat of a common fluorescent light fixture.o

* Solar Powered - each Smart Skylight (TM) is entirely solar powered.
There is no electrical hookup required. The system is designed to
store the solar energy created from the solar panel to run the Smart
Skylight (TM) even if the sun is not out.

* Mirror Array - Each unit contains either a single or triple mirror
dynamic tracking array. The mirrors continuously track the sun across
the sky even during winter's low sun angles and provide an abundant
source of free light with no flickering or humming of electricity. The
mirror array and GPS controller create a solar array that directs the
sunlight through two special diffuser lenses and through the lightwell
that directs the resulting light from the roof level into the building
space.

* Acrylic or Polycarbonate Super-Impact Skylight Dome - Each Smart
Skylight(TM) features a clear, thermally formed, high impact resistant
acrylic or Polycarbonate dome that provides superior strength and UV
resistance and is easy to install.

In addition, our Ciralight Suntracker Smart Skylight(TM) products provide
natural daylighting that is a key component when building to United States Green
Building Council ("USGBC") standards and for receiving Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design ("LEED") certification. Our Ciralight Suntracker Smart
Skylights(TM) are Energy Star Products. Ciralight Suntracker Smart Skylights(TM)
are maintenance free, energy saving, powered by the sun and completely
self-contained.

Ciralight Suntracker Smart SkylightsTM are sold with a ten year warranty.

A summary of the advantages of Ciralight Suntracker Smart Skylights(TM)
includes the following:

* More daylight when the sun is low in the sky.
* Daylight levels that allow users to turn lights off for longer hours
of the day.
* Provides high levels of illumination, more evenly distributed than
standard skylights.
* Do not create the heat gain associated with normal skylights.
* Provides better color rendition than electric lights.
* Absence of flicker and hum associated with electric lights.
* Natural light provides a more productive work environment
* Improved student performance.
* Increased sales in retail environments.
* Reduced operating expenses.
* Solar powered, entitling users to tax and utility incentives.
* Provides a bright, abundant, quiet, healthy natural light, just as
nature intended for up to 10 hours a day.

MANUFACTURING

At the present time, we contract with manufacturers who have expertise in a
particular industry to produce the components of our Ciralight Suntracker Smart
Skylight(TM). All manufacturing is done by companies in the United States and
our products are made in the United States. We have an excellent relationship
with all our manufactures. We purchase components from our manufacturers by
issuing purchase orders. The terms of these purchase orders are typically Net 30
days, although we have elected to pay for our purchases at the time of delivery.
Therefore, we have fully paid for our entire inventory of components at our
Corona, California warehouse. The terms our purchase orders with our
manufacturers are F.O.B. origin. Therefore, as the purchaser of these component

parts, we are responsible for the cost of shipment of our purchases from a
manufacturer's location to our warehouse in Corona, California where all our
components are stored. As customers purchase our products, the components are
picked and kitted at our warehouse for shipment to the job site. The assembly
and installation of the components occurs at the jobsite and is handled by our
dealers or distributors and their subcontractors. We have no role or
responsibility with respect to the installation or assembly of our products.

Our manufacturers were chosen based on two critical factors: (1) the
quality control programs they have in place at their facilities and (2) their
ability to handle large volumes for producing our component parts. All of our
manufacturers and suppliers are standard fabrication and assembly companies
capable of meeting large volume product demands and, therefore, have excess
capacity to handle significant increases in sales. Although we are dependent on
our manufacturers and suppliers, we have alternative firms who could provide the
same production to us on short notice.

Our manufacturers include the following:

Manufacturer Component Location
------------ --------- --------
All Metals Mirror Assembly Texas
Angell & Giroux Lightwells California
Apex Plastics GPS Controller Case Texas
CanFab Roof Curbs California
Empire Metal Products Lightwells/Roof Curbs Arizona
KCC International Roof Curbs Kentucky
Malcolite Corporation Lenses California
Plastic Fabricating Lenses Utah
Ray's Plastics Skylight Dome California
Replex Plastics Skylight Dome Ohio
Solar Industries Dome Metal Frame Arizona
Suntron Corporation GPS Electronics and Assembly Texas

MARKETS AND MARKETING

We are currently marketing our Ciralight Suntracker Smart Skylight(TM) to
Architects, Roofing and General Contractors, Lighting Companies, Solar
Companies, Retail Chains, industrial and commercial property owners and
managers. Our target properties are warehouses, industrial buildings, retail
stores, public facilities, schools and military installations in the United
States. We are working on establishing sales in Canada, Mexico, Europe and in
other overseas markets.

Our marketing efforts will be directed to create greater awareness of our
products in the market place as an innovative, energy saving solution for
lighting in the building industry. Our marketing will be geared toward new
construction and retrofitting existing buildings.

The market for advanced skylights is growing year over year due to
pressures on building owners, tenants, schools and government agencies to reduce
energy consumption and save on utility costs. There has been much attention
within the current President's administration on the need to focus the country's
energy policy on innovative green products that will reduce the demand for
energy, decrease the carbon footprint and create new jobs. Our Ciralight
Suntracker Smart Skylights(TM) are a truly break-through energy saving product
that can help meet all of these objectives - transform the United States away
from fossil fuels to renewable and job creating green businesses.

This movement toward "green" energy solutions and the pressure to reduce
the carbon footprint, as well as other environmental initiatives, will continue
to spur the growth in this market segment and the need for solutions like our
Ciralight Suntracker Smart Skylights(TM).

We currently sell our products through a network of dealers and
distributors. Dealers and Distributors are typically companies that are already
in the lighting, roofing or renewable energy business. Dealers buy our products
at an established dealer price and resell the product to end users at the
suggested retail price. Distributors are typically identified for foreign
countries where they are responsible for purchasing, housing and supplying our
products to a network of Dealers they are required to establish within their
appointed territories.

DEALER AGREEMENTS:

Our dealer agreements are non-exclusive as no single dealer has been
awarded the exclusive right to market and sell our products within any
geographical area. Our dealer agreements typically have an initial term of three
years with options to renew for additional one year periods provided that the
dealers have complied with the terms and conditions of their dealer agreements.
Our dealers purchase our skylights at our Dealer Price Level and they are
encouraged to sell our Ciralight Suntracker skylights at our suggested retail
price. However, our dealers may sell our skylights at any price they wish. We
require our dealers to make a 50% deposit at the time they place an order with
the balance of 50% payable upon delivery F.O.B. our Corona warehouse. We may
grant better payment terms to dealers who have good payment histories with us in
which case we may grant them Net 21 Day or Net 30 Day terms. Since we ship our
skylights F.O.B. our Corona warehouse, our dealers or customers bear the cost of
shipping and bear the risk of any loss or damage from shipping.

Currently, we have the following dealers:

A Greener New Jersey (United States)
Adler Technology (United States)
AdvanTek (United States)
AIA Skylights (United States)
Arizona Solar Concepts (United States)
ATEE Corp. (Mexico)
Bear Electric (United States)
Best Contracting Services (United States)
BPL Carbon Free Solutions (United States)
Centimark Roofing (United States)
Chaparral Green Energy Solutions, LLC (United States)
City Solar (United States)
Concept RHE (Spain)
Customized Roofing (United States)
Desert Power Inc. (United States)
Eco-Smart, Inc. (United States)
Energy 21 USA LLC (United States)
European Solar Engineering (Denmark)
Freelite Skylights (United States)
Global NES of Arizona (United States)
Global NES of Oregon (United States)
Grand Canyon Supplies, Inc. (United States)
Greencrest Energy Solutions (United States)
Green Tech Design-Build, Inc.(United States)
Green Tree Products (United States)
GS Consulting Corp S.A. de C. V. (El Salvador)
Hallman & Keele (United States)
IMASTEC (Spain)
Inline Electric (United States)
JJ Ltd (United States)
Kemper & Associates, Inc., d/b/a Total Roofing & Reconstruction (United
States)
Lighting Audit Services (United States)
Matrix Roofing (United States)
MGM Electric Limited (Canada)
Mulick Construction (United States)

Nevada Energy Audit (United States)
Pacific HVAC (United States)
PEP Solar (United States)
Progressive Roofing (United States)
Samjung Tech, Inc. (South Korea)
Sola Tech Consulting (United States)
Straight Up Energy (United States)
Suntricity (United States)
SW Daylight (United States)
The Energy Solutions Group Worldwide, LLC (United States)
Total Roofing & Reconstruction (United States)
Urban Green Solutions, Inc. (Puerto Rico)
Vega Solar (United States)
WePower (United States)

DISTRIBUTOR AGREEMENTS:

In the international markets, we will generally select large companies to
act as our exclusive distributors in a foreign country. Our payment terms with
our domestic and international distributors are the same as our terms with our
dealers. Our international distributors are responsible for all costs associated
with clearing customs and any tariffs. We encourage our international
distributors to recruit dealers with their territories to sell our skylights.
Currently, we have the following international distributors:

* Ciralight Europe (29 European Union Countries)
* RSB Construction LTD. (Turkey)
* ZEEV Shimon & Sons, Ltd. (Israel)

We have received interest in our distributorships from companies in
Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chili, Germany, Greece, Italy, Indonesia, Japan,
Mexico, Poland and Romania. We are at various stages of discussions and
negotiations with these companies and we have not reached any definitive terms
with any one is these companies in these countries.

After securing the technology rights to the Suntracker(TM) products from
old Ciralight, we elected to undertake a process of reviewing and enhancing the
design to take it from good quality to industrial grade quality. This process
included an improved design of numerous components including the GPS Controller,
the post system, the mirror assembly and consolidating the mid-tray frame and
dome frame into one frame. At that time, we elected to remove the product from
the market until all the improvements were completed.

In December 2009, the improved design was completed and the product passed
a 30 year life cycle test under extreme environmental conditions. This
demonstrated the Ciralight SuntrackerSmart Skylights(TM) to be robust and
durable. The Ciralight Suntracker Smart Skylights(TM) have since been certified
to comply with the American Architecture and Manufacturers Association
Certification standards for Skylights. Since the release of the improved design,
the reliability of the product shipped has been over 99.99%.

We intend to increase our marketing efforts in the next few months and this
includes recruiting more dealers and distributors and promoting our products
through public relations, as well as through direct advertising. Our advertising
campaign will be focused on creating consumer awareness of our products and the
benefits users of our products will realize through energy and cost savings. Our
marketing campaign will include attending industry related business conventions
and trade shows, advertising in industry related publications, and directly
contacting building industry professionals, property owners and green industry
businesses. We are members of the United States Green Building Council (USGBC)
and the Daylighting Collaborative. We are also a U.S. Department of Energy,
Energy Star Partner. We intend to be very active in "green" initiatives on both
local and national levels.

We intend to fund our marketing campaign from our working capital and the
proceeds of this Private Placement.

Our skylights have been installed at two Ace Hardware Stores, two Office
Depot stores, two IKEA stores, one in Canada and one in the United States, at
the Google facility in San Jose California, at LG in Turkey, West Marine Store
in Hawaii, The Columbus Zoo, The San Diego Gas and Electric Innovation Center,
and we doing an installation at our fifth Whole Foods store. We recently
installed our first units at a Fresh and Easy store. We have completed five
Giant Food Stores. The Patagonia installation was at their main facility and
included nearly 200 skylight stores. In December 2009, Boeing installed 26 units
as a test of our products and they have advised us that they are very pleased
with the results. Johnson & Johnson installed 66 units at their facility in
Mexico. Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport installed 12 units in their Terminal 3. We
have sold four of our skylights to Supply Core, a defense contractor, for
installation on a U.S. Navy Base in Japan.

We recently received approval from the Los Angeles Unified School District
as well as the Los Angeles Community College District to complete pilot test
projects using our Smart Skylights at their facilities. In addition, the US Navy
has indicated a strong interest in our Smart Skylights as an energy saving
lighting solution for their facilities.

We are developing ongoing relationships with major retailers, big box
stores and major corporations and governmental units.

COMPETITION

Our major competitors in the active skylight market are Solar Tracking
Skylights, Inc., Natural Lighting, Inc. and Sundolier. Our major competitors in
the passive skylight market are Solatube, Inc., Sun Optics and Velux Skylights.
Therefore, our markets are highly competitive and many of our passive skylight
competitors have greater financial and human resources that we have, while our
active skylight competitors are smaller companies with minor, if any,
competitive advantages. We will compete with these competitors by offering
better quality and effective products at competitive pricing. If we fail to
effectively compete with our competitors, then we may not be able to stay in
business. These competitors have already successfully marketed and
commercialized products that compete with our products.

OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Our success depends on the skills of our employees and their ability to
continue to innovate and improve our intellectual property. We rely on a
combination of copyright, trademark, patent and design laws, trade secrets,
confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our
intellectual property rights and proprietary methodologies. We enter into
confidentiality agreements with our employees and consultants and we generally
control access to and distribution of proprietary information. These agreements
generally provide that any confidential information developed by us or on our
behalf be kept confidential. Further, we require all employees to execute
written agreements assigning to us all rights in all inventions, developments,
technologies and other intellectual property created by our employees.

We currently own United States Letters Patent No. 7,430,077 for "Solar
Tracking Reflector System for Structure Lighting," which issued on September 30,
2008, and which we acquired in December 2009. This patent covers our three
mirror system that is included in our Suntracker One(TM) product and expires on
May 25, 2027. We also own United States Patent Application No. 12/323,935 for
"Solar Tracking Reflector System for Structure Lighting," which was filed on
November 26, 2008, and acquired by us in December 2009. Our U.S. patent
application covers our "one or more" mirror system and, therefore covers both
our Suntracker One(TM) product (which has three mirrors) and our Suntracker
Two(TM) product (which has one mirror). On June 14, 2010, the United States
Patent and Trademark Office allowed our U.S. Patent Application by issuing a
Notice of Allowance and Notice of Allowability. Our application has entered the
issue process and should issue in due course.

We currently have one European patent application pending before the
European Patent Office (European Patent Application No. 07797814.6). We also
have one Canadian patent application pending before the Canadian Intellectual
Property Office (Canadian Patent Application No. 2,667,258). On June 25, 2010,
our Mexican patent application pending before the Mexican Institute of
Industrial Property (Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2008/015119) was
approved for our three mirror or more design.. Our Canadian, European and
Mexican patent applications covering our one or more mirror systems and,
therefore, cover both our Suntracker One(TM) and Suntracker Two(TM) products. We
do not have any products that are not covered by our U.S. Patent or our U.S.,
Canadian, European and Mexican patent applications.

Except for our U.S. and Mexico patents and our patent applications pending
in Canada, Europe, Mexico and the United States, we have no other patent rights.

In addition, we are in the process of registering various trademarks for
which we have common law rights. We also own certain trade secrets and formulae.

GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS

We are subject primarily to local rules and regulations in the form of
building codes, which apply mostly to structures and roofing materials, and are
not currently regulated by federal or state governments. The limited rules and
regulations to which we are subjected will not have any material impact on our
products, business or profitability.

BUSINESS AND LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS REGARDING CLIMATE CHANGE

Since our products result in energy cost savings from the delivery and
distribution of daylight to the facilities who utilize our products and actually
reduce the level of greenhouse gas emissions, we are not negatively impacted by
existing laws and regulations regarding climate change. We feel that legal,
technological, political and scientific developments regarding climate change
will actually enhance the demand for our products, which should translate into
higher revenues and, hopefully, higher profits.

FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK

The Company is selling products in the foreign arena and is exposed to
foreign currency fluctuations. However, since we quote our prices in U.S.
Dollars, we do not feel the risks normally associated with foreign currencies
are material to our business.

RAW MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES

The Company has contact with and access to numerous suppliers of the raw
materials and components needed to manufacture our skylights and is not
dependent on any one supplier or limited group of suppliers. The components
contained in our Smart Skylight(TM) system are supplied by third party
manufacturers and, in most cases, there are alternative sources for each
component.

Our manufacturers include the following:

DEPENDENCE ON ONE OR A FEW MAJOR CUSTOMERS

The Company has a diverse customer base and is not dependent on any one
customer or limited group of customers. The Company's offerings of products
appeal to both the retail and industrial customer base. Through the widespread
use of the Company's products, the Company will continue to increase its
customer base.

DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

We are currently subleasing our office and warehouse facility at 670 E.
Parkridge, Suite 112, Corona, California 92879 for $3,000 a month. The property
is owned by one of our Directors, Frederick Feck. This is a written lease and
runs month to month. The space consists of approximately 3,500 square feet. We
occupied this warehouse facility from March 1, 2009, until September 30, 2009,
on a rent free basis. Since October 1, 2009, we have occupied this warehouse
facility under a verbal lease for $3,000 per month. Our board of directors
believes this new rental arrangement is fair to the Company. See "Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions."

We are also leasing a satellite office at 15303 Ventura Boulevard, 9th
Floor, Sherman Oaks, California 91403 at a cost of $150 per month.

SUBSIDIARIES

We have no subsidiaries.

EMPLOYEES

The Company has adopted a business model based on an efficient, lean and
small operations office with most of the emphasis and focus on directing and
managing the sales activities out in the field. The Company currently has five
(5) full-time employees and two part-time employees, none of whom is represented
by a labor union. The full time paid employees are Jeffrey Brain, our President
and Chief Executive Officer, one Warehouse Manager, One Accountant, and two
Executive Assistants. Our part-time employee is an Architect and Administrative
Assistant. Company believes it has an excellent relationship with its employees.
Our sales people will work for distributors and dealers and not be employees of
the Company. They will be compensated on commission only basis.

Currently, we do not have any employment agreements with any of our
officers, directors or employees. We may offer employment agreements to our
executive officers in the future.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On October 15, 2009, we filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State
of California for the County of Orange, Central Justice Center (Case No.
30-2009, 00314998) ("Complaint") against Jacque Stevens, Rex Miller, Greg
Schmalz, A-1 Daylighting, Consultech, Daylight Specialist and DOES 1-25. The
Complaint includes five causes of action by us against the defendants: Tortious
Interference with Contract, Commercial Disparagement, Conspiracy, Breach of
Contract, Unfair Business Practices and Libel. The Complaint alleges that we
entered into a nondisclosure agreement as part of an agreement to work toward
completing a joint venture/private label of our solar lighting systems with
Firestone Building Products and that defendants attempted to interfere with our
business relationship with Firestone Building Products by disparaging our
products (misrepresentations regarding prior sales, installations and quality of
service and that we provided or substituted defective or improper parts in our
products). We are seeking general, special and punitive or exemplary damages and
injunctive relief against the defendants.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains forward looking statements. These statements
relate to future events or future financial performance and involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause Ciralight Global
or our industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of
activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward
looking statements.

In some cases, you can identify forward looking statements by terminology
such as "may," "will," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes,"
"estimates," "predicts," "potential," or the negative of these terms or other
comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or
results may differ materially. Although we believe that the expectations
reflected in the forward looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee
future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We are under no
duty to update any of the forward looking statements after the date of this
prospectus to confirm our prior statements to actual results.

Further, this prospectus contains forward looking statements that involve
substantial risks and uncertainties. Such statements include, without
limitation, all statements as to expectation or belief and statements as to our
future results of operations, the progress of any research, product development
and clinical programs, the need for, and timing of, additional capital and
capital expenditures, partnering prospects, the protection of and the need for
additional intellectual property rights, effects of regulations, the need for
additional facilities and potential market opportunities. Our actual results may
vary materially from those contained in such forward looking statements because
of risks to which we are subject, such as lack of available funding, competition
from third parties, intellectual property rights of third parties, litigation
and other risks to which we are subject.

SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA

The summary financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction
with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" and our financial statements and the related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus. We derived the financial data as of September 30,
2011 (Unaudited), December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007, and for the Nine month
period ended June 30, 2010 (Unaudited), the period from February 26, 2009
(inception) to December 31, 2010 and the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
from our financial statements and from the financial statements of the prior
company, Old Ciralight, included in this prospectus. The unaudited financial
data for the period from January 1, 2009 to March 14, 2009 of the prior company,
Old Ciralight, is presented for comparative purposes. The historical results are
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period.

Registrant Prior Company (Old Ciralight)
------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
For the period
For the from For the period
Nine Months For the Year Feb 26, 2009 from
Ended Ended (inception) to Jan 1, 2009 Years Ended December 31,
September 30, December 31, December 31, March 14, -------------------------
2011 2010 2009 2009 2008 2007
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Sales $ 823,139 $ 774,105 $ 640,425 $ 179,894 $ 1,592,263 $ 666,626
Cost of Sales 586,974 609,796 563,249 124,749 1,403,599 580,848
Gross Profit 236,166 164,309 77,176 55,145 188,664 85,778
Total Operating Expenses 784,020 1,189,111 894,870 145,748 3,051,576 4,747,828
Loss from Operations (547,854) (1,024,802) (817,694) (90,603) (2,862,912) (4,662,050)
Total Other Income (Expense) (28,472) (9,614) (2,595) (77) (929,360) (834,492)
Net Loss (576,326) (1,034,416) (820,289) (90,680) (3,792,272) (5,496,542)
Basic and Diluted Loss per share $ (0.04) $ (0.09) $ (0.11) $ (0.00) $ (0.15) $ (0.23)
Weighted average shares outstanding 13,660,919 11,729,651 7,543,444 24,577,743 24,577,743 23,597,143

Registrant Prior Company (Old Ciralight)
------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Sep 30, 2011 Dec 31, 2010 Dec 31, 2009 Dec 31, 2008 Dec 31, 2007
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 64,482 $ 203,108 $ 265,753 $ 14,163 $ 69,544
Working Capital (Deficit) $ 186,004 $ 252,872 $ 365,884 $(2,928,847) $(2,337,114)
Total Assets $ 523,471 $ 748,144 $ 998,937 $ 759,611 $ 598,747
Total Liabilities $ 301,226 $ 456,387 $ 582,193 $ 3,516,369 $ 2,633,168
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) $ 222,245 $ 291,757 $ 416,744 $(2,756,758) $(2,034,421)

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL
CONDITION OF THE REGISTRANT, CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC., FOR THE THREE AND NINE
MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010 (UNAUDITED), THE PERIOD FROM
FEBRUARY 26, 2009 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND OF THE PRIOR COMPANY (OLD
CIRALIGHT OR CIRALIGHT, INC.) CONDUCTING BUSINESS FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1,
2009 TO MARCH 14, 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2008 AND 2007, SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND
THE NOTES TO THOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS THAT ARE INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS
PROSPECTUS. REFERENCES TO "WE," "OUR," OR "US" IN THIS SECTION REFERS TO THE
COMPANY AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES. OUR DISCUSSION INCLUDES FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
BASED UPON CURRENT EXPECTATIONS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES, SUCH AS
OUR PLANS, OBJECTIVES, EXPECTATIONS AND INTENTIONS. ACTUAL RESULTS AND THE
TIMING OF EVENTS COULD DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED IN THESE
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AS A RESULT OF A NUMBER OF FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE
SET FORTH UNDER THE RISK FACTORS, FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND BUSINESS
SECTIONS IN THIS PROSPECTUS. WE USE WORDS SUCH AS "ANTICIPATE," "ESTIMATE,"
"PLAN," "PROJECT," "CONTINUING," "ONGOING," "EXPECT," "BELIEVE," "INTEND,"
"MAY," "WILL," "SHOULD," "COULD," AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS TO IDENTIFY
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.

OVERVIEW

We are a manufacturer and wholesaler of "advanced skylights" for use in
warehouses, schools, retail stores, airports, military installations and
residential buildings. We develop, market and sell the Suntracker One(TM) and
Suntracker Two(TM) units and we are currently marketing our advanced daylighting
system under the name Smart Skylight(TM).

We were incorporated in the state of Nevada on February 26, 2009, under the
name "Ciralight West, Inc." On March 13, 2009, we changed our name to "Ciralight
Global, Inc." In April 2009, we entered into an Exchange of Stock for Assets
Agreement with Mr. George Adams, Sr. to acquire certain assets including, but
not limited to, a United States patent, patent applications pending in Canada,
Europe, Mexico and the United States, artwork, trademarks, equipment, furniture,
databases, technical drawings, promotional materials, trade names and inventory
parts and marketing rights related to the Suntracker One(TM) and Suntracker
Two(TM) daylighting products previously owned and distributed by Ciralight,
Inc., a Utah corporation, such assets having been foreclosed on by Mr. Adams,
who was the secured creditor of Ciralight, Inc. We did not acquire any equity
securities, debts, liabilities or financial obligations of Ciralight, Inc., the
Prior Company. Ciralight, Inc. is a predecessor to Ciralight Global, Inc.,
although we have no affiliation, contractual or otherwise, with Ciralight, Inc.
or any of its employees, officers or directors. Ciralight, Inc. ceased
operations on January 27, 2009.

As described in the above paragraphs, Ciralight, Inc. is a predecessor to
Ciralight Global, Inc., since the major portion of the business and assets of
Ciralight, Inc. were acquired by Ciralight Global, Inc. in a series of related

successions in each of which the acquiring person or entity acquired the major
portion of the business and assets of Ciralight, Inc.

In order to raise working capital, we commenced a Private Placement
Offering in the amount of $800,000 in April 2009. Our common stock was offered
at a fixed price of $.25 per share. We raised the $800,000 by mid October 2009
and the investors purchased a 40% stake in the company for a total of 3,200,000
shares.

In October 2009, the Company elected to extend the private offering in
order to raise an additional $500,000 in working capital by offering 2,000,000
additional shares at $.25 per share. We raised the additional $500,000 by mid
January 2010, at which time the offering was closed.

On September 14, 2011, we completed a private offering of 945,360 shares of
common stock at $.50 per share and raised $472,680 in offering proceeds, which
will be used for working capital.

RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND TRENDS RELATING TO THE COMPANY AND INDUSTRY

The industrial lighting industry is intensely competitive. We have numerous
competitors in the United States and elsewhere. Several of these competitors
have already successfully marketed and commercialized products that compete with
our products. Our success is dependent up our ability to effectively and
profitably produce, market and sell our products. Our business strategy and
success is dependent on the skills and knowledge of our management team and
consultants. The marketability and profitability of our products is subject to
unknown economic conditions, which could significantly impact our business,
financial condition, the marketability of our products and our profitability. We
are vulnerable to the current economic crisis which may negatively affect our
profitability. Our success depends, in part, on the quality of our products.

Our Smart Skylight(TM) products provide natural daylighting that is a key
component in many current construction and existing structures. Smart
Skylights(TM) are maintenance free, powered by the sun and completely
self-contained. We are currently marketing our Smart Skylight(TM) products to
warehouse owners, roofing companies, shopping centers, schools and military
installations in the United States. We are working on establishing sales in
Canada, Mexico and overseas. The market for advanced skylights is growing year
over year due to pressures on building owners, tenants, schools and government
agencies to reduce energy consumption and expense. The "green" movement, carbon
footprint ideology and other environmental initiatives should provide increased
growth in our market segment.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our management's discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based on our condensed financial statements, which
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements as well as the reported net sales and expenses
during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and
assumptions. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other
factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note
3 to our financial statements, we believe that the following accounting policies
are the most critical to aid the reader in fully understanding and evaluating
this discussion and analysis:

BASIS OF PRESENTATION - The accompanying financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for
financial information and have been prepared pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for smaller reporting
companies. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal

recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of
operations of the Registrant for the Three and Nine Month Periods Ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited) and for period from February 26, 2009
(inception) to December 31, 2010 have been reflected herein. The results of
operations for the period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to December 31,
2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire
year. These statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
audited financial statements of the Prior Company (Old Ciralight) for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

The accompanying audited financial statements of the Prior Company (Old
Ciralight) for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 reflect the activity
of Ciralight, Inc., the company whose assets were foreclosed on by Mr. Adams, a
secured creditor, on March 14, 2009. Ciralight Global, Inc. subsequently
acquired such assets from Mr. Adams on April 1, 2009. We did not acquire any
equity securities, debt, liabilities or financial obligations of Ciralight, Inc.
Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Ciralight, Inc. is deemed to be a predecessor to Ciralight Global, Inc. Pursuant
to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding
a lesser component of an entity constituting a business, management has
evaluated the facts and circumstances relating to our transactions with Mr.
Adams and considers that the attributes and the continuity of the
revenue-producing activity we acquired are sufficient to warrant disclosure of
the financial information of the prior company, as if a business was acquired.
The accompanying financial statements are presented in order to comply with
regulatory requirements and to inform you of the financial condition and
operations of our Company and of the prior company, Ciralight, Inc., that
conducted the revenue-producing activity we acquired.

The accompanying September 30, 2011 and 2010 unaudited financial statements
of the Registrant reflect the operations of Ciralight Global, Inc. for the Three
and Nine Month Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and the financial
condition as of September 30, 2011.

The accompanying December 31, 2010 audited financial statements of the
Registrant reflect the operations of Ciralight Global, Inc. for the period
February 26, 2009 (inception) through December 31, 2010 and the financial
condition as of December 31, 2010. The accompanying notes include pro forma
presentation, which consolidates and presents individually the activity of the
Prior Company (Old Ciralight) for the period January 1, 2009 through March 14,
2009 (date operations ceased) and the activity of Ciralight Global, Inc. for the
period February 26, 2009 (inception) through December 31, 2009.

The accompanying December 31, 2008 and 2007 audited financial statements
reflect the operations of the Prior Company (Old Ciralight) for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the financial condition as of the years then
ended.

The Company has not included financial statements of Old Ciralight for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009 and the comparable quarter of the prior year, since
management has concluded such interim financial statements would not provide any
material financial information to investors. Unaudited financial data for Old
Ciralight is presented for illustrative and pro forma purposes in the preceding
Summary Financial Data section on page 34 and in Note 2 under Liquidity and
Operations of the included 2009 financial statements. In addition, the activity
that occurred at Old Ciralight during the period from January 1, 2009 to March
14, 2009 is addressed under the Results of Operations of the prior company in
the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of this Form prospectus.

INVENTORIES - Inventories, consisting primarily of finished skylight units
and parts for sale, are recorded using the average cost method. Inventory
acquired from the prior company was booked at the historical cost of the prior
company.

REVENUE RECOGNITION - Revenue on our skylights and parts are recognized
when the units or parts ship to the customer.

EARNINGS PER SHARE - Earnings per share is computed in accordance with the
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 260 (SFAS No. 128, "EARNINGS PER Share"). Basic net
income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed
using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the
period, as adjusted for the dilutive effect of the Company's outstanding
convertible preferred shares using the "if converted" method and dilutive
potential common shares. Potentially dilutive securities include warrants,
convertible preferred stock, restricted shares, and contingently issuable
shares.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION - The Company accounts for stock-based
compensation under the provisions of FASB ASC 718 (Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), "SHARE-BASED PAYMENT"), which
requires the Company to measure the stock-based compensation costs of
share-based compensation arrangements based on the grant date fair value and
generally recognizes the costs in the financial statements over the employee's
requisite service period. Stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based
compensation awards granted was based on the grant date fair value estimated in
accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 718.

SHIPPING AND HANDLING COSTS - The Company includes shipping and handling
costs that are billed to our customers in revenue and the actual costs incurred
for shipping and handling are included in cost of goods sold in accordance with
the provisions of FASB ASC 605-45-45-20. The related costs are considered
necessary to complete the revenue cycle.

WARRANTY COSTS - Commencing April 1, 2009, the Company provided a five-year
warranty covering the labor and materials associated with its installations.
Effective September 1, 2009, the Company changed the coverage to ten years in
the U.S. The Company's "advanced skylights" are warranted by the manufacturer
for 10 years, generally. The Company (at its option) will repair, replace or
give credit for the original purchase price on any of its products or parts. An
accrual for a loss contingency has been made, since warranty expenses to date
have been consistent and a reasonable estimate of future expenses can be made,
in accordance with FASB ASC 460-10-50-8 (c).

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) - FASB ASC Topic 220 (Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 130, "REPORTING COMPREHENSIVE INCOME") establishes
standards for reporting comprehensive income (loss) and its components in a
financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other
financial statements. Comprehensive income (loss), as defined, includes all
changes in equity during the period from non-owner sources, such as foreign
currency translation adjustments.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB ASC 805 (FAS No. 141(R), "BUSINESS
COMBINATIONS" ("FAS 141(R)")), which requires the acquiring entity in a business
combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in the transaction, establishes the acquisition date fair value as the
measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and
requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the
information they need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect
of the business combination. FASB ASC 805 is prospectively effective to business
combinations for which the acquisition is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The impact of
FASB ASC 805 on the Company's financial statements will be determined in part by
the nature and timing of any future acquisitions completed.

In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
FASB ASC 815-40 (SFAS No. 161, "DISCLOSURES ABOUT DERIVATIVES INSTRUMENTS AND
HEDGING ACTIVITIES, AN AMENDMENT OF FASB STATEMENT NO. 133"). FASB ASC 815-40
requires enhanced disclosures about a company's derivative and hedging
activities. ASC 815-40 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of
FASB ASC 815-40 did not have a material impact on results of operations, cash
flows, or financial position.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB ASC 350-30 (FASB Staff Position (FSP)
FAS No. 142-3, "DETERMINATION OF THE USEFUL LIFE OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS"). FASB
ASC 350-30 amends the factors an entity should consider in developing renewal or
extension assumptions used in determining the useful life of recognized
intangible assets under FASB ASC 350-30 (SFAS No. 142, "GOODWILL AND OTHER
INTANGIBLE ASSETS"). FASB ASC 350-30 must be applied prospectively to intangible
assets acquired after the effective date. The Company applied the guidance of
the FASB ASC 350-30 to intangible assets acquired after January 1, 2009. The
Company's adoption of FASB ASC 350-30 did not have a material impact on its
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In June 2008, the FASB ratified FASB ASC 815-40 (EITF Issue 07-5 (EITF
07-5), "DETERMINING WHETHER AN INSTRUMENT (OR AN EMBEDDED FEATURE) IS INDEXED TO
AN ENTITY'S OWN STOCK"). FASB ASC 815-40 provides that an entity should use a
two step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or
embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the
instrument's contingent exercise and settlement provisions. It also clarifies on
the impact of foreign currency denominated strike prices and market-based
employee stock option valuation instruments. FASB ASC 815-40 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those
years. On April 1, 2009, the Company adopted this pronouncement.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 825-10-50 and FASB ASC 270 ("FSP
107-1 AND APB 28-1 INTERIM DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS"), which increases the frequency of fair value disclosures to a
quarterly basis instead of on an annual basis. The guidance relates to fair
value disclosures for any financial instruments that are not currently reflected
on an entity's balance sheet at fair value. FASB ASC 825-10-50 and FASB ASC 270
are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
adoption of FASB ASC 825-10-50 and FASB ASC 270 did not have a material impact
on results of operations, cash flows, or financial position

In May 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 470 (Staff Position No. APB 14-1
"ACCOUNTING FOR CONVERTIBLE DEBT INSTRUMENTS THAT MAY BE SETTLED IN CASH UPON
CONVERSION (INCLUDING PARTIAL CASH SETTLEMENT)"). FASB ASC 470 clarifies that
convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion
(including partial cash settlement) are not addressed by FASB ASC 470-20-65-1
(paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, "ACCOUNTING FOR CONVERTIBLE DEBT AND DEBT
ISSUED WITH STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS"). Additionally, FASB ASC 470 specifies that
issuers of such instruments should separately account for the liability and
equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity's nonconvertible debt
borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. FASB ASC
470 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The
adoption of FASB ASC 470 did not have an effect on our consolidated financial
statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 855 (SFAS No. 165, "SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS"), which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure
of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, FASB ASC 855
sets forth (a) the period after the balance sheet date during which management
of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for
potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (b) the
circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions
occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and (c) the
disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that
occurred after the balance sheet date. FASB ASC 855 is effective for interim or
annual financial reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of
FASB ASC 855 did not have an impact on results of operations, cash flows, or
financial position.

In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 810 (SFAS No. 167, "AMENDMENTS TO
FASB INTERPRETATION NO. 46(R)"). FASB ASC 810 applies to FASB ASC 105 entities
and is effective for annual financial periods beginning after November 15, 2009
and for interim periods within those years. Earlier application is prohibited. A
calendar year-end company must adopt this statement as of January 1, 2010. The
Company does not anticipate the adoption of FASB ASC 810 to have a material
impact on results of operations, cash flows, or financial position.

In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 860 (SFAS No. 166, "ACCOUNTING FOR
TRANSFERS OF FINANCIAL ASSETS-AN AMENDMENT OF FASB STATEMENT NO. 140"). FASB ASC
860 applies to all entities and is effective for annual financial periods
beginning after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within those years.
Earlier application is prohibited. A calendar year-end company must adopt this
statement as of January 1, 2010. This statement retains many of the criteria of
FASB ASC 860 (FASB 140, "ACCOUNTING FOR TRANSFERS AND SERVICING OF FINANCIAL
ASSETS AND EXTINGUISHMENTS OF LIABILITIES") to determine whether a transfer of
financial assets qualifies for sale accounting, but there are some significant
changes as discussed in the statement. Its disclosure and measurement
requirements apply to all transfers of financial assets occurring on or after
the effective date. Its disclosure requirements, however, apply to transfers
that occurred BOTH before and after the effective date. In addition, because
FASB ASC 860 eliminates the consolidation exemption for Qualifying Special
Purpose Entities, a company will have to analyze all existing QSPEs to determine
whether they must be consolidated under FASB ASC 810. The Company does not
anticipate the adoption of FASB ASC 860 to have a material impact on results of
operations, cash flows, or financial position.

In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-05, "MEASURING LIABILITIES AT FAIR
VALUE." ASU 2009-05 applies to all entities that measure liabilities at fair
value within the scope of FASB ASC 820, "FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND
DISCLOSURES." ASU 2009-05 is effective for the first reporting period (including
interim periods) beginning after issuance, October 1, 2009, for the Company. The
Company does not anticipate the adoption of ASU 2009-05 to have a material
impact on results of operations, cash flows, or financial position.

In October 2009, the FASB ratified FASB ASC 605-25 (the EITF's final
consensus on Issue 08-1, "REVENUE ARRANGEMENTS WITH MULTIPLE DELIVERABLES").
FASB ASC 605-25 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15,
2010. Earlier adoption is permitted on a prospective or retrospective basis. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on its
consolidated financial statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE REGISTRANT

COMPARISON OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

NET SALES. Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2011 were
$246,013 compared to net sales of $205,189 for the three months ended September
30, 2010.

Sales and demand for our products have been increasing each quarter. As a
result of increased sales our gross profit was $96,473 for the three months
ended September 30, 2011 compared to $28,171 for the three months ended
September 30, 2010.

COST OF SALES. Cost of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2011
was $149,540 on net revenue of $246,013, representing 61%, and providing a gross
profit of 39%. Cost of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was
$177,018 on net revenue of $205,189, representing 86%, and providing a gross
profit of 14%.

Cost of Sales have decreased due to the Company's implemented changes in
its business operations in the ongoing effort to decrease its cost of sales.
These include stricter controls over the movement of inventory to reduce losses,
damage, and waste, making improvements to the products in order to reduce
warranty work, implementing cost effective shipping options available through
better pre-planning and scheduling, managing inventory levels by scheduling
production to match demand forecasts, changing to more quality oriented
suppliers, negotiating more favorable manufacturing agreements, and implementing
cost reducing design changes.

GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2011
was $96,473, providing a gross profit margin of 39%. Gross profit for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 was $28,171, providing a gross profit margin of
14%.

Our gross profit has increased with continued product enhancements and
refinements to our production process. We anticipate higher gross profit margins
in the future.

OPERATING EXPENSES. Our operating expenses consist of research and
development expenses, selling and marketing expenses and general and
administrative expenses. For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010,
total operating expenses were $275,146 and $295,205, respectively. As a
percentage of sales, operating expenses were approximately 112% for the three
months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 144% for the three months ended
September 30, 2010.

Reduced operating expenses have resulted from a number of changes in the
manner in which the business was operated. We have created a culture of
efficiency and accountability. We eliminated the practice of having consultants
and sales people on retainers. Compensation is tied to work completed. We
elected not to directly hire sales personnel and instead require that they work
for third party dealers and distributors, thus reducing the overhead cost of
carrying and supporting an extended staff.

INCOME TAXES. For the three months ended September 30, 2011, management has
decided not to record the tax benefit.

COMPARISON OF THE NINE MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

NET SALES. Net sales for the nine month period ended September 30, 2011
were $823,139 compared to $614,182 for the nine month period ended September 30,
2010.

As a result of the efficiencies we implemented, our gross profit was
$236,166 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2011 compared to $213,003
for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010.

COST OF SALES. Cost of sales for the nine month period ended September 30,
2011 was $586,974 on net sales of $823,139, representing 71%, and providing a
gross profit of 29% compared to the nine month period ended September 30, 2010
in which cost of sales was $401,179 on net sales of $614,182, representing 65%,
and providing a gross profit of 35%.

The company plans to reduce the cost of sales by implementing a number of
changes in the business operations. These includes stricter controls over the
movement of inventory to reduce losses, damage, and waste, making improvements
to the products in order to reduce warranty work, implementing cost effective
shipping options available through better pre-planning and scheduling, managing
inventory levels by scheduling production to match demand forecasts, changing to
local quality oriented suppliers to reduce inbound shipping costs, negotiating
more favorable manufacturing agreements, and implementing cost reducing design
changes.

GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit for the nine month period ended September 30,
2011 was $236,166, providing a gross profit margin of 29% compared to gross
profit for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 of $213,003, providing
a gross profit margin of 35%.

During 2010 and 2011, in an effort to address issues experienced by
customers that purchased product from the former company, Ciralight, Inc., we
sold replacement parts or parts that had been purchased, but never shipped to
old customers, at our cost. This has lowered our gross profit margin but this
practice will be stopping as most of the prior customer issues have been
addressed. With the elimination of resolution of past issues, continued product
enhancements and refinements to our production process, we anticipate higher
gross profit margins in the future.

OPERATING EXPENSES. Our operating expenses consist of research and
development expenses, selling and marketing expenses and general and
administrative expenses. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2011,
total operating expenses were $784,020; as a percentage of sales, operating
expenses were approximately 95%. For the nine month period ended September 30,
2010, total operating expenses were $904,400; as a percentage of sales,
operating expenses were approximately 147%.

Reduced operating expenses will result from a number of changes in the
manner in which the business was operated. In 2009 our Company operated with
only four employees and outsourced required additional services on an as needed
basis. No employees from the prior company were employed or brought over to our
Company. They were not part of the rights we acquired and this has created a
culture of efficiency and accountability. We eliminated the practice of having
consultants and sales people on retainers. Compensation is tied to work
completed. We elected not to directly hire sales personnel and instead require
that they work for third party dealers and distributors, thus reducing the
overhead cost of carrying and supporting an extended staff.

INCOME TAXES. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2011,
management has decided not to record the tax benefit.

COMPARISON OF THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 WITH THE PERIOD FROM FEBRUARY 26,
2009 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2009.

NET SALES. Net sales for year ended December 31, 2010 were $774,105
compared to $640,425 for the period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2009. The increase of $133,680 in net sales for 2010 represents a
21% increase over the net sales in 2009.

Sales and demand for our products have been increasing each quarter. Lower
sales in 2009 were attributable to the transition time required for our Company
to move, setup and commence the new operations, set up our sales force, as well
as address former company customer, investor and supplier issues, raise our
working capital, and a self-imposed 60 day period, during which we refrained
from making new sales while product improvements were being completed. As a
result of the efficiencies we implemented, our sales increased steadily during
2010.

COST OF SALES. Cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2010 was
$609,796 on net revenue of $774,105, representing 79% of net sales, compared to
the period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to December 31, 2009 in which cost
of sales was $563,249 on net sales of $640,425, representing 88% of net sales.

The reduction of cost of sales as a percentage of net sales in 2010,
compared to 2009, was achieved by implementing a number of changes in the
business operations. These included stricter controls over the movement of
inventory to reduce losses, damage, and waste, making improvements to the
products in order to reduce warranty work, implementing cost effective shipping
options available through better pre-planning and scheduling, managing inventory
levels by scheduling production to match demand forecasts, changing to more
quality oriented suppliers, negotiating more favorable manufacturing agreements,
and implementing cost reducing design changes.

GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2010 was
$164,309, providing a gross profit margin of 21% compared to gross profit for
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to December 31, 2009 of $77,176,
providing a gross profit margin of 12%.

During 2009 and 2010, in an effort to address issues experienced by
customers that purchased product from the prior company, Ciralight, Inc., we
sold replacement parts or parts that had been purchased by customers, but never
shipped to old customers by the prior company, at our cost. Our gross profit
increased, even though we sold product at cost in order to resolve past issues
from the prior company. All of the open issues and problems reported by former
customers have been resolved. With the elimination of resolution of past issues,
continued product enhancements and refinements to our production process, we
anticipate higher gross profit margins in the future.

OPERATING EXPENSES. Our operating expenses consist of research and
development expenses, selling and marketing expenses and general and
administrative expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2010, total operating
expenses were $1,189,111, representing 154% as a percentage of net sales. For
the period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to December 31, 2009, total
operating expenses were $894,870, representing 140% as a percentage of net
sales.

Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 were
$61,459, representing 8% of net sales, compared to the period from February 26,
2009 (inception) to December 31, 2009 in which research and development expenses
were $22,229, representing 3% of net sales. During 2010, we improved the design
and operating efficiency of our energy-saving Smart Skylights(TM)and developed
our 4'x8' Smart Skylight(TM), the Suntracker Three(TM).

Selling and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 were
$211,151, representing 27% of net sales, compared to the period from February
26, 2009 (inception) to December 31, 2009 in which selling and marketing
expenses were $72,847, representing 11% of net sales. During 2010, our marketing
efforts have focused on exhibiting and presenting our patented product line and
the introduction of the Suntracker Three(TM). In addition to our marketing
strategy with architects and builders planning new construction with the
emphasis on energy-efficient "Green" buildings, we have progressed towards
introducing our Smart Skylights(TM) for homes.

General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010
were $916,501, representing 118% of net sales, compared to the period from
February 26, 2009 (inception) to December 31, 2009 in which general and
administrative expenses were $799,794, representing 125% of net sales. General
and administrative expenses decreased in 2010, as a percentage of sales, as a
result of the number of changes in the manner in which our business was operated
that were initiated in 2009 and fully implemented during 2010. In 2009 our
Company operated with only four employees and outsourced required additional
services on an as needed basis. No employees from the prior company were
employed or brought over to our Company. They were not part of the rights we
acquired and this has created a culture of efficiency and accountability. We
eliminated the practice of having consultants and sales people on retainers.
Compensation is tied to work completed. We elected not to directly hire sales
personnel and instead require that they work for third party dealers and
distributors, thus reducing the overhead cost of carrying and supporting an
extended staff.

INCOME TAXES. Management has decided not to record the tax benefit for the
year ended December 31, 2010 or for the period from February 26, 2009
(inception) to December 31, 2009.

COMPARISON OF FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007 OF THE PRIOR COMPANY
(OLD CIRALIGHT)

NET SALES. During the 2008 fiscal year, net sales were $1,592,263 as
compared to $666,626 during the 2007 fiscal year, an increase of 139%. The
increase was attributable to strong sales growth and increased commercial sales
in the U.S. Commercial sales increased due to sales efforts in those markets.
There was also continued growth in the U.S. residential market as a result of a
new Southern California residential sales office that opened during 2008.

COST OF SALES. Cost of sales for the 2008 fiscal year was $1,403,599 as
compared to $580,848 for the 2007 fiscal year, an increase of approximately
142%. The increase in cost of sales is attributable to the growth in commercial
sales as commercial projects carry a higher cost of sales relative to net sales.
During 2008, the prior company was awarded and completed a large commercial
project performing only installation services, which did not involve the high
level of integration that is normally provided.

GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit for the 2008 fiscal year was $188,664 as
compared to gross profit of $85,778 for the 2007 fiscal year, representing gross
margins of approximately 12% and 13%, respectively. The decrease in gross profit
percent is directly related to the decision to increase commercial contracts,
which generally have lower gross profit.

OPERATING EXPENSES. Operating expenses consist of research and development
expenses, sales and marketing expenses and general and administrative expenses.
During the 2008 fiscal year, operating expenses were $3,051,576 while operating
expenses for the 2007 fiscal year were $4,747,828. As a percentage of sales,
operating expenses were 192% and 712% for the twelve months ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in operating expenses from 2007 to
2008 is due to decreases in both selling expenses and professional costs. Upon
the Prior Company's (Old Ciralight's) release of its 2007 operating results,
shareholders demanded that management decrease the monthly operating expenses by

1/3. With the elimination of wasteful selling expenses, selling and marketing
expenses decreased from $324,603 in 2007 to $171,051 in 2008, a decrease of over
47%. By incurring only necessary professional costs, general and administrative
expenses decreased from $4,364,681 in 2007 to $2,875,004 in 2008, a decrease of
over 34%.

OTHER EXPENSE. Other expenses were $929,360 for the 2008 fiscal year as
compared to $834,492 for the 2007 fiscal year.

NET LOSS. The prior company had a net loss of $3,792,272 for the 2008
fiscal year as compared to a net loss of $5,496,542 for the 2007 fiscal year.

DISCUSSION OF THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 2009 TO MARCH 14, 2009 OF THE PRIOR
COMPANY (OLD CIRALIGHT)

The only revenue recognized by Old Ciralight during the quarter ended March
31, 2009, resulted from sales orders for Suntracker products received in 2008
for inventory items that were in inventory at December 31, 2008 and shipped
during January 2009. On January 27, 2009, Old Ciralight granted Mr. Adams the
exclusive right to manufacture and market its products. As a result, Old
Ciralight ceased operations on that date, except for activities necessary to
sort out its debts and wind down its business affairs conducted by a reduced
staff of two people. On March 15, 2009, Mr. Adams formally foreclosed on the
assets of Old Ciralight, and assets considered to have value were transferred to
facilities of Mr. Adams. Except for the fulfillment in January 2009 of orders
received by Old Ciralight in 2008, all material 2009 activity related to the
sales of Suntracker products is included in the Company's 2009 financial
statements. The Company has concluded that the January 2009 revenue recognized
by Old Ciralight is not material and such information would not provide material
additional information to investors.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The following unaudited pro forma combined results of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2009 presents the operations of the Company and
Ciralight Inc. as if our acquisition of the assets formerly owned by Ciralight
Inc. occurred on March 15, 2009, the day after Ciralight Inc. ceased operations.
The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the actual results that
would have occurred had our acquisition been completed as of the beginning of
the periods presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of combined results.

Prior Company Registrant Pro forma
Ciralight Inc. Ciralight Global, Inc. Consolidated
------------------- ---------------------- ------------
For the period from For the period from For the
January 1, 2009 to March 15, 2009 to year ended
March 14, December 31, December 31,
2009 2009 2009
---------- ---------- ----------

Statement of Operations Data:
Sales $ 179,894 $ 640,425 $ 820,319
Cost of Sales 124,749 563,249 687,998
---------- ---------- ----------
Gross Profit 55,145 77,176 132,321
Total Operating Expenses 145,748 897,501 1,043,249
Loss from Operations (90,603) (820,325) (910,928)
---------- ---------- ----------
Interest Income (Expense) (77) 36 (41)
---------- ---------- ----------
Net Loss $ (90,680) $ (820,289) $ (910,969)
========== ========== ==========

CASH FLOWS - FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 and 2010.

Net cash used in operating activities was $579,106 and $354,604 for the
nine month period ended September 30, 2011 and for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2010, respectively. Net cash used in operating activities the nine
month period ended September 30, 2011 was attributable primarily to decreases in
accounts payable, inventory and notes receivable-related parties, offset by
increases in accounts receivable and prepayments and deposits. Net cash used in
operating activities for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, was
attributable to decreases in accounts receivable and prepayments and deposits,
offset by increases in inventory and accounts payable.

Cash used in investing activities for the nine month period ended September
30, 2011 was $4,262 from the acquisition of property and equipment compared to
no cash used in investing activities for the nine month period ended September
30, 2010.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $444,742 and $137,421 for the
nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Net cash
provided by financing activities for both periods was attributable to sales of
the Company's common stock through a private offering and proceeds from notes
payable for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010.

CASH FLOWS - FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 COMPARED WITH THE PERIOD FROM
FEBRUARY 26, 2009 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2009.

Net cash used in operating activities was $615,464 and $1,085,168 for the
year ended December 31, 2010 and for the period from February 26, 2009
(inception) to December 31, 2009, respectively. The net cash of $615,464 used in
operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 is attributable to the
net loss of $1,034,416 for the period, offset primarily by a decrease of
$112,487 in accounts receivable and an increase in accounts payable of $156,596.
The net cash of $1,085,168 used in operating activities for the period from
February 26, 2009 (inception) to December 31, 2009 is attributable to the net
loss of $820,289 for the period, offset primarily by an increase in accounts
receivable of $270,817, an increase in prepayments and deposits of $135,391 and
an increase in other payables of $140,916.

There was no net cash used in investing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2010 and for the period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2009, net cash used in investing activities was a result of the
acquisition of $3,500 of business assets.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $552,819 and $1,354,421 for
the year ended December 31, 2010 and for the period from February 26, 2009
(inception) to December 31, 2009, respectively. Net cash provided by financing
activities for both periods was attributable to sales of the Company's common
stock through a private offering of $280,000 and $1,242,000 and from the
issuance of related party notes of $275,000 and $122,295 for the year ended
December 31, 2010 and for the period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2009, respectively.

CASH FLOWS - COMPARISON OF FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007 OF THE
PRIOR COMPANY (OLD CIRALIGHT)

Net cash used in operating activities was $2,291,290 and $3,346,765 for the
2008 and 2007 fiscal years, respectively.

Net cash used in investing activities was $14,683 and $99,031 for the 2008
and 2007 fiscal years, respectively.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $2,250,592 and $3,041,882 for
the 2008 and 2007 fiscal years, respectively.

MATERIAL IMPACT OF KNOWN EVENTS ON LIQUIDITY

The disruption in the credit markets has had a significant adverse impact
on a number of financial institutions. As of March 31, 2010, however, our
liquidity and capital investments have not been materially adversely impacted,
and we believe that they will not be materially adversely impacted in the near
future. We will continue to closely monitor our liquidity and the credit
markets. We cannot, however, predict with any certainty the impact to us of any
further disruption in the credit environment.

There are no other known events that are expected to have a material impact
on our short-term or long-term liquidity.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

We have financed our operations primarily through cash flows from
operations and debt and equity financings. We commenced a private placement
offering in the amount of $800,000 in April 2009. Our common stock was offered
at a fixed price of $.25 per share. We raised the $800,000 by mid October 2009
and the investors purchased a 40% stake in the company for a total of 3,200,000
shares.

We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents and anticipated cash
flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs,
including our cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures, for at
least the next six months.

While we would like to grow our business with our cash flow, a robust
increase in orders for our products, delays in collection of our accounts
receivable and/or the incurrance of unforeseen expenses would likely necessitate
our engaging in a capital raising transaction in the third or fourth quarter of
2010.

We may also seek to raise additional cash to fund future investments or
acquisitions we may decide to pursue. To the extent it becomes necessary to
raise additional cash in the future, we may seek to raise it through the sale of
debt or equity securities, funding from joint-venture or strategic partners,
debt financing or loans, issuance of common stock, or a combination of the
foregoing. We currently do not have any binding commitments for, or readily
available sources of, additional financing. Nor do we have any current plans to
raise additional capital. However we reserve the right to raise additional
capital in the future in which case the percentage ownership of our shareholders
would be diluted. We cannot provide any assurances that we will be able to
secure the additional cash or working capital we may require to continue our
operations.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

We have certain fixed contractual obligations and commitments that include
future estimated payments. Changes in our business needs, cancellation
provisions, changing interest rates, and other factors may result in actual
payments differing from the estimates. We cannot provide certainty regarding the
timing and amounts of payments. We have presented below a summary of the most
significant assumptions used in our determination of amounts presented in the
tables, in order to assist in the review of this information within the context
of our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of March 31,
2010, and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and
cash flows in future periods.

Payments Due by Period
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total Less than 1 year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 5 years +
----- ---------------- --------- --------- ---------

Contractual Obligations:
Notes payable $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Principal Payments 323,788 -- 323,788 -- --
Interest Payments (1) 51,428 18,138 33,290 -- --
Operating Leases 46,350 46,350 -- -- --
Services Agreement 20,520 13,680 6,840
Commitments to Purchase Inventory 65,645 65,645 -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Totals: $507,731 $143,813 $363,918 $ -- $ --
======== ======== ======== ======== ========

----------
(1) The two notes payable are due on or before December 15, 2012, bear interest
at the rate of Prime Rate (as quoted in the Wall Street Journal) plus 2%
per annum and estimated interest payments are expected to be paid on a
quarterly basis.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have not entered into any other financial guarantees or other
commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. We have
not entered into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our shares and
classified as stockholders' equity or that are not reflected in our financial
statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in
assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity
or market risk support to such entity. We do not have any variable interest in
any unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or
credit support to us or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development
services with us.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

We have not had changes in or disagreements with our accountants on
accounting and financial disclosure.

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our executive officers are elected by the board of directors and serve at
the discretion of the board. All of the current directors serve until the next
annual shareholders' meeting or until their successors have been duly elected
and qualified. The following table sets forth certain information regarding our
current directors and executive officers:

Name Age Position Director Since
---- --- -------- --------------
Jeffrey S. Brain 51 President, Chief Executive Officer, April 2009
Chief Financial Officer, Chief
Operating Officer, Treasurer
and Director

Frederick Feck 80 Corporate Secretary and Director April 2009

Certain biographical information of our directors and officers is set forth
below.

JEFFREY BRAIN, PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER AND A DIRECTOR

Since March 15, 2009, until the present time, Jeff has been involved in the
formation and operation of the Company and currently serves us in the capacities
of President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and as a director. Jeff is a successful entrepreneur, recognized civic
leader and government strategist. Jeff served as Chief Operating Officer of the
Smokey Robinson Food Company from October 2003 until November 2008. Jeff took
the company from startup to national distribution in just 18 months. Prior to
joining Smokey Robinson Food Company, Jeff was the Founder and President of
Valley Vote, Inc., one of the largest government reform organizations in U.S.
history. Jeff presided over a Board of Directors of 100 of Los Angeles' top
community and business leaders, directed 2,000 volunteers and a team of
professional consultants and attorneys.

As President of Valley Vote, Inc., Jeff was responsible for preparing a
$1.1 billion dollar budget and a public service plan to provide police, fire,
transportation, parks, utilities, etc. for a city that would be the sixth
largest city in the U.S. He also managed all the business functions, including
media relations, public speaking, community outreach, budgeting, government
structure and public service planning, message development, legislative
development and he oversaw the day-to-day administrative staff and operations.

Prior to forming Valley Vote, Jeff founded Jeff Brain's Real Estate
Network, a full service real-estate brokerage and consulting firm based in Los
Angeles. Before launching his entrepreneurial ventures, Jeff held the position
of Assistant Vice President at Eastern Pacific, a real estate development
company. In this role, Jeff was responsible for analyzing, budgeting and
syndicating multi-million dollar real estate development projects and managed
the Accounting Department. Jeff also served as the Director of Acquisition and
Finance at Triangle Investments, Inc., where he was responsible for real estate
acquisitions, project analysis, syndications and management.

Jeff has a Bachelor of Science degree in Finance as well as a Bachelor of
Science Degree in Accounting, both from the California State University of
Northridge.

FREDERICK FECK, CORPORATE SECRETARY AND A DIRECTOR

Mr. Feck is a Director of the Company and our Corporate Secretary. Mr. Feck
has been in the real estate development and construction industry from 1960
until the present time. Mr. Feck developed the first true condominium with Fee
Title to cubical air space in California. After the passage of the Medicare bill
in late 1965, Mr. Feck entered the health care field syndicating and developing
convalescent hospitals. Mr. Feck acted as a general partner in the syndication
of a 204 bed convalescent hospital known as The Rio Hondo Convalescent Hospital
in Montebello, California. In 1970, Mr. Feck co-founded Environmental
Communities, Inc., to manufacture mobile and modular homes from a facility in
Corona, California. Mr. Feck sold his interest in 1972 and moved to San Diego
County. Mr. Feck formed Calco West, Inc. and was engaged in the development and
construction of single family tract homes. Mr. Feck also formed Calco West
Realty, Inc. in 1976, a general real estate operation with six offices and a
Real Estate School in the North San Diego County area. The company was sold to
its employees in 1981. Mr. Feck then formed Calco West Financial Corporation in
1981 for the management of commercial and residential real estate, primarily his
own. Mr. Feck was also one of the original founders of the San Marcos National
Bank in 1981 and served on its Board of Directors for a period of 14 years. Mr.
Feck was born in Maine, attended the University of Maine for two years, moved to
California in 1950 and attended Northrop Aeronautical Institute in Los Angeles
from which he graduated in 1952 as an aeronautical engineer. He worked for
Northrop Aircraft Company on the N-69 Guided Missile Program for two years
before going into the service. Mr. Feck served as a pilot in the United States
Air Force for five years. Mr. Feck is licensed in California as a general
contractor and a real estate broker and also holds a commercial pilot's license.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

We do not currently have an audit committee or a compensation committee.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

Our directors do not receive any direct compensation for their service on
our board of directors. Any future director compensation will be determined by
our compensation committee, once it is chartered.

DIRECTORSHIPS

During the past five years, none of our directors or persons nominated or
chosen to become directors held any other directorship in any company with a
class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the 1934 Act or subject
to the requirements of Section 15(d) of such Act or any other company registered
as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

OTHER SIGNIFICANT EMPLOYEES

No other significant employees exist.

FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS

No family relationship exists between or among any of our officers and
directors. However, one of our directors, Frederick Feck, is the brother-in-law
of George Adams, Sr., our largest shareholder.

INVOLVEMENT IN CERTAIN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Except as described below, during the past ten years, no present director,
executive officer or person nominated to become a director or an executive
officer of Ciralight:

(1) had a petition under the federal bankruptcy laws or any state
insolvency law filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or
similar officer appointed by a court for the business or property of
such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at
or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation
or business association of which he was an executive officer at or
within two years before the time of such filing;
(2) was convicted in a criminal proceeding or subject to a pending
criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor
offenses);
(3) was subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently
reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent
jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from or
otherwise limiting his involvement in any of the following activities:
(i) acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker,
commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker,
leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of
any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter,
broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person,
director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and
loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or
continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such
activity;
(ii) engaging in any type of business practice; or
(iii)engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale
of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation
of federal or state securities laws or federal commodities laws;
or
(4) was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently
reversed, suspended or vacated, of an federal or state authority
barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the
right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph
(3) (i), above, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such
activity; or
(5) was found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action),
the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or
commodities law, and for which the judgment has not been reversed,
suspended or vacated.

Jeffrey Brain, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and a
member of our board of directors, filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the
Federal Bankruptcy Code on October 7, 2005, and was discharged from bankruptcy
on February 3, 2006. The reason for the bankruptcy was that Mr. Brain had worked
as President of Valley Voters Organized Toward Empowerment ("Valley Vote") for
five years and was owed approximately $253,000 by Valley Vote, which had
continuously promised to pay him, but did not. In the meantime, Mr. Brain owed
approximately $60,000 in income and payroll taxes, which he could not pay
because of the money owed to him by Valley Vote. Our board of directors believes
that Mr. Brain is an excellent and dedicated officer, director and employee of
the Company and that his earlier bankruptcy is not reflective of his business
acumen or his value to the Company.

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

On December 14, 2009, we adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
applicable to our officers, including our principal executive officer, principal
financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller and any other
persons performing similar functions. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
was designed to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct, full,
fair and accurate disclosure, compliance with laws, prompt internal reporting
and accountability to adherence to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Our
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on our website at
http://www.ciralightglobal.com. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will be
provided free of charge by us to interested parties upon request. Requests
should be made in writing and directed to the Ciralight at the following
address: 670 E. Parkridge, Suite 112, Corona, California 92879

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the aggregate compensation paid by the
Company to our executive officers and directors of the Company for services
rendered during the periods indicated. Randall Letcavage resigned from his
offices of President, Chief Executive Officer and Director on March 18, 2010.
Jeffrey Bain was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer on March 19,
2010.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and
Principal Stock Option All Other
Position Year(1) Salary($) Bonus($) Awards($)(2) Awards($)(3) Compensation($) Total($)
-------- ---- --------- -------- --------- ------------ --------------- --------

Jeffrey Brain, 2010 $139,000 $ 0 $ 0 $56,348 (4) $41,634 (5) $236,982
Chief 2009 $ 95,500 $ 0 $83,726 (6) $ 0 $ 0 $179,226
Executive and 2008 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Financial
Officer and
Director

Frederick 2010 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $32,199 (7) $36,000 (8) $ 68,109
Feck, 2009 $ 0 $ 0 $ 400 (9) $ 0 $ 9,000 (10) $ 9,400
Corporate 2008 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Secretary and
Director

Randall 2010 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Letcavage, 2009 $202,177 (11) $ 0 $60,052 (12) $ 0 $24,000 (13) $286,229
Former 2008 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
President

----------
(1) The compensation covered in 2009 includes the period from the Company's
inception on February 26, 2009, through December 31, 2009.
(2) The amounts listed in this column for 2009 reflect the fair value of
certain contractual rights to receive restricted stock in accordance with
the services rendered by such executives and anti-dilution rights granted
to such executives during the period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2009. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock issued
as founders' shares of the Company's common stock was $.001 per share (the
par value of the Company's common stock on April 1, 2009 was utilized to
issue the amount of shares of common stock equating to the fair value of
the services rendered by Messrs. Letcavage, Brain and Feck as described in
footnotes (4), (6) and (7) to the above Summary Compensation Table). The
grant date fair value of the restricted stock issued as anti-dilution
shares of the Company's common stock as compensation and for services
rendered was $.25 per share (the price on December 31, 2009, based on
issuances of the Company's common stock to private offering subscribers for
cash) was utilized to issue the amount of shares of common stock equating
to the value of the services rendered by Messrs. Letcavage and Brain as
described in footnotes (4) and (6) to the above Summary Compensation
Table). The fair values were determined in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Share-Based Payments (FASB ASC
718).
(3) The amounts listed in this column for 2010 reflect the fair value of
certain stock options granted to Messrs. Brain and Feck during 2010. On
December 30, 2010, the Company's Board of Directors approved and adopted
the Company's 2010 Employee and Consultant Stock Incentive Plan ("Plan")
and reserved a total of 800,000 shares of common stock for issuance
pursuant to the Plan. On December 30, 2010, the Board of Directors granted
a total of 605,000 options at an exercise price of $.425 per share,
exercisable over five years from the date of grant. 275,000 stock options
were granted to the Company's President, Jeffrey Brain, for achieving
certain milestones and for serving on the Board of Directors. 100,000 stock
options were granted to Frederick Feck, a Director of the Company, for
serving on the Board of Directors in 2010. The fair values were determined
in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718,
Share-Based Payments (FASB ASC 718).
(4) On December 30, 2010, the Board of Directors granted a total of 605,000
options at an exercise price of $.425 per share, exercisable over five
years from the date of grant . 275,000 stock options were granted to the
Company's President, Jeffrey Brain, for achieving certain milestones and
for serving on the Board of Directors.
(5) Includes (i) $14,256 in health insurance benefits paid by the Company for
Mr. Brain and his dependents; (ii) $1,518 as an automobile allowance from
the Company; and (iii) $25,860 is royalty payments assigned to Mr. Brain by
our majority shareholder, George Adams, Sr. See CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND
RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
(6) Includes (i) $320 as the value of 320,000 founder's shares of the Company's
common stock issued at $.001 par value to Mr. Brain in April 2009 for
services rendered; (ii) $30,000 as the value of 120,000 shares of common
stock issued at $.25 per share to Mr. Brain for services rendered, accrued
at $3,000 per month from March through December 2009; (iii) $23,350 as the
value of 94,118 anti-dilution shares of common stock issued to Mr. Brain;
and (iv) $29,876 as the value of 119,505 shares of common stock issued to
Mr. Brain as bonus compensation. All of the above shares of the Company's
common stock are beneficially owned by Mr. Brain, but held of record by
Bayport Holding Company, LLC, Mr. Brain's personal holding company, and Mr.
Brain has sole dispositive and voting control over such shares.
(7) On December 30, 2010, the Board of Directors granted a total of 605,000
options at an exercise price of $.425 per share, exercisable over five
years from the date of grant. 100,000 stock options were granted to
Frederick Feck, a Director of the Company, for serving on the Board of
Directors in 2010.

(8) Represents rental payments to Mr. Feck in the amount of $3,000 per month
for the lease of our Corona, California warehouse facility from January 1,
2010 through December 31, 2010, on a verbal month to month lease.
(9) Represents $400 as the value of 400,000 founder's shares of common stock
issued at par value of $.001 per share to Mr. Feck in April 2009 for
services rendered.
(10) Represents rental payments to Mr. Feck in the amount of $3,000 per month
for the lease of our Corona, California warehouse facility from October 1,
2009, through December 31, 2009, on a verbal month to month lease. Mr. Feck
allowed us to use this warehouse facility from March through September 2009
on a rent free basis.
(11) During the period from the Company's inception on February 26, 2009,
through December 31, 2009, the Company paid iCapital Finance, Inc.
consulting fees in the amount of $202,177. Mr. Letcavage is the majority
owner of iCapital Finance, Inc.
(12) Includes (i) $240 as the value of 240,000 founder's shares of the Company's
common stock issued at par value of $.001 per share to Mr. Letcavage in
April 2009 for services rendered; (ii) $400 as the value of 400,000
founder's shares of common stock issued at par value of $.001 per share to
iCapital Finance, Inc. in April 2009 for services rendered; (iii) $29,412
as the value of 117,647 anti-dilution shares of common stock issued to Mr.
Letcavage; and (iv) $30,000 as the value of 120,000 shares issued at $.25
per share to Mr. Letcavage for services rendered, accrued at $3,000 per
month from March through December 2009. As the majority owner of iCapital
Finance, Inc., Mr. Letcavage has sole dispositive and voting power over the
shares held of record by iCapital Finance, Inc.
(13) Represents rental payments to iCapital, Inc. commencing May 1, 2009, in the
amount of $3,000 per month on a verbal month to month basis for use of our
former executive offices at 2603 Main Street, Suite 1150, Irvine,
California 92614. This rental agreement is no longer in effect.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

We do not have a formal compensation plan for our directors.

EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS

We do not have any employment agreements with our employees or officers.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

We have prepared the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis to
provide you with information that we believe is necessary to understand our
executive compensation policies and decisions as they relate to the compensation
of our named executive officers.

We have only two members on our board of directors and do not currently
have a compensation committee. However, we intend to expand our board of
directors in the near future by appointing or electing at least two new
directors who will be deemed to be independent directors. The presence of
independent directors on our board of directors will allow us to form and
constitute a compensation committee of our board of directors.

The primary objectives of the compensation committee with respect to
executive compensation will be to (i) attract and retain the best possible
executive talent available to us; (ii) motivate our executive officers to
enhance our growth and profitability and increase shareholder value; and (iii)
reward superior performance and contributions to the achievement of corporate
objectives.

The focus of our executive pay strategy will be to tie short-term and
long-term cash and equity incentives to the achievement of measurable corporate
and individual performance objectives or benchmarks and to align executive
compensation with the creation and enhancement of shareholder value. In order to
achieve these objectives, our compensation committee will be tasked with
developing and maintaining a transparent compensation plan that will tie a
substantial portion of our executives' overall compensation to our sales,
operational efficiencies and profitability.

Our board of directors has not set any performance objectives or benchmarks
for 2010, as it intends for those objectives and benchmarks to be determined by
the compensation committee once it is constituted and then approved by the
board. However, we anticipate that compensation benefits will include
competitive salaries, bonuses (cash and equity based), health insurance and
stock option plans.

Our compensation committee will meet at least quarterly to assess the cost
and effectiveness of each executive benefit and the performance of our executive
officers in light of our revenues, expenses and profits.

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN

On December 30, 2010, the Company's Board of Directors approved and adopted
the Company's 2010 Employee and Consultant Stock Incentive Plan ("Plan") and
reserved a total of 800,000 shares of common stock for issuance pursuant to the
Plan. The purpose of this Plan is to provide incentives to attract, retain and
motivate eligible persons whose present and potential contributions are
important to the success of the Company by offering them an opportunity to
participate in the Company's future performance through awards of Options,
Restricted Stock and Stock Bonuses.

PLAN INFORMATION

Number of Securities
Number of Securities to be Remaining Available for
Issued Upon Exercise of Weighted-Average Exercise Future Issuance Under
Outstanding Options, Price of Outstanding Options, Equity Compensation Plans
Warrants and Rights Warrants and Rights (excluding column (a))
Plan Category (a) (b) (c)
------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------------

Equity Compensation Plans -- -- --
Approved by Security
Holders

Equity Compensation Plans Not 680,900 $0.30 119,100
Approved by Security Holders

Total 680,900 $0.30 119,100

not yet trading nor does it have an extended history of stock prices or
volatility, expected volatility and average contractual life variables were
estimated utilizing a weighted average of comparable published volatilities and
contractual lives based on industry comparables. Expected pre-vesting
forfeitures were estimated based on expected employee turnover. The fair value
of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2010 was estimated as of
the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions: a dividend yield of zero percent, an expected volatility of between
70.5% and 71.5%, a risk-free interest rate of 0% and a remaining contractual
life of between 1.0 and 5.0 years.

AGGREGATE OPTION/SAR EXERCISES AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION/SAR VALUE TABLE

There have been no exercises of stock options/SAR by executive officers.

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS

There were been no long-term incentive plan awards made by the company.

REPRICING OPTIONS

We have not repriced any stock options.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

To our knowledge, the following table sets forth, as of November 20, 2011,
information regarding the ownership of our common stock by:

* Persons who own more than 5% of our common stock o each of our
directors and each of our executive officers; and
* all directors and executive officers as a group.

Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares
shown, except as otherwise noted.

Amount and Nature
of Beneficial Ownership
Name and Address ------------------------------
of Beneficial Owner Number (1) Percent (1)
------------------- ---------- -----------
George Adams, Sr. (2) 4,823,224 33.75%
670 E. Parkridge, Suite 112
Corona, California 92879

Jeffrey S. Brain (3) 799,623 5.59%
670 E. Parkridge, Suite 112
Corona, California 92879

Frederick Feck (4) 700,000 4.90%
670 E. Parkridge, Suite 112
Corona, California 92879

All officers and directors
as a group (2 persons) 1,499,623 10.49%

----------
(1) The numbers and percentages set forth in these columns are based on
14,292,567 shares of common stock outstanding as of November 20, 2011. The
number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined in

accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any
other purpose. Under such rule, beneficial ownership includes any shares as
to which the selling security holder has sole or shared voting power or
investment power and also any shares, which the selling security holder has
the right to acquire within 60 days.
(2) In addition to the 4,823,224 shares owned of record and beneficially by Mr.
Adams, Mr. Adams owns 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock. The
combination of common stock and the voting rights for the Series A
Preferred Stock result in Mr. Adams having the right to cast 51% of all
votes in the election of our directors and on any acquisition or merger
transaction in which we may become involved in the future. See "Description
of Securities -- Preferred Stock -- Voting Rights."
(3) Mr. Brain is the beneficial owner of these 624,623 shares of our common
stock, which are owned of record by Bayport Holding Company, LLC, Mr.
Brain's personal holding company. Mr. Brain has sole dispositive and voting
power over these shares. Includes options to purchase 175,000 shares of
common stock that are exercisable within the next 60 days.
(4) Include options to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock that are
exercisable within the next 60 days.

There are no arrangements or understandings among the entities and
individuals referenced above or their respective associates concerning election
of directors or other any other matters which may require shareholder approval.

CHANGES IN CONTROL

We are not aware of any arrangements that may result in a change in control
of the Company.

By virtue of his ownership of majority voting rights over our common stock,
Mr. George Adams, Sr. will continue to control the Company after this offering
and investors in our common stock will be unable to change control of our board
of directors and of our Company. Therefore, the shares being offered for sale by
the selling shareholders lack the value normally attributable to voting rights.
This could result in a reduction in the value of the shares you own because of
their ineffective voting power.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Although we have not adopted formal procedures for the review, approval or
ratification of transactions with related persons, we adhere to a general policy
that such transactions should only be entered into if they are on terms that, on
the whole, are no more favorable, or no less favorable, than those available
from unaffiliated third parties and their approval is in accordance with
applicable law. Such transactions require the approval of our board of
directors.

ANTI-DILUTION SHARES

Our board of directors granted anti-dilution rights to Jeffrey Brain,
iCapital Finance, Inc. (a company owned by Randall Letcavage, our former Chief
Executive Officer, and his business partner, Rosemary Nguyen), Randall Letcavage
and David E. Wise, our securities counsel. These anti-dilution rights entitled
Jeffrey Brain, iCapital Finance, Inc., Randall Letcavage and David E. Wise to
acquire additional shares of our common stock at $.25 per share in order to
maintain their original percentage ownership in the our common stock.
Consequently, we issued as compensation and for services rendered the following
anti-dilution shares in January 2010:

Name of Recipient Number of Shares Value of Shares
----------------- ---------------- ---------------
Jeffrey Brain 94,118 $23,529
iCapital Finance, Inc. 70,588 $17,647
Randall Letcavage 117,647 $29,412
David E. Wise 70,588 $17,647

All previously granted anti-dilution rights expired in January 2010 and no
anti-dilution rights are included in this prospectus.

TRANSACTIONS WITH OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

From May 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010, we subleased our office facilities
for $3,000 a month from iCapital Finance, Inc., a company owned by our former
Chief Executive Officer and his business partner, Rosemary Nguyen. This was a
verbal lease and ran from month to month. This monthly fee was to share a
portion of the rent, the utilities and the time of one staff person to assist us
by handling some of our business, including answering telephones, processing
telephone and internet leads, coordinating and communicating with the customers,
dealers, distributors and general administrative activities. This lease
arrangement was deemed the most cost efficient and time saving approach as it
saved us from the expense of setting up our own offices, which would have
required searching for and negotiating a lease, purchasing furniture, equipment,
phones and hiring our own office personnel. Our board of directors believes this
rental arrangement was fair to the Company. This lease was terminated on March
31, 2009.

In January 2010, we entered into a nonexclusive distributor agreement with
Globalight Energy Solutions, LLC, a minority owned entity in which Randall
Letcavage, our former Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffrey Brain, our current
Chief Executive Officer, each own a 16.25% beneficial ownership interest. The
majority owners of Globalight Energy Solutions, LLC are the entertainer William
"Smokey" Robinson, Jr. and his wife. In lieu of Globalight Energy Solutions, LLC
paying the standard distributorship fee of $15,000 to the Company, Smokey
Robinson agreed to use his name, contacts and likeness to promote the Company
products. Our board of directors believes that the value to the Company of Mr.
Robinson's promotion of our products is greater than the $15,000 distributorship
fee.

Aside from the arrangement with Smokey Robinson to promote the Company's
products in lieu of Globalight Energy Solutions, LLC paying the distributorship
fee to the Company, its distributorship agreement does not contain preferential
or more favorable terms or conditions than agreements with our other
distributorships.

Jeffrey Brain, Randall Letcavage and iCapital Finance, Inc., a company
controlled by Mr. Letcavage, acquired certain anti-dilution shares of our common
stock as described above.

TRANSACTIONS WITH GEORGE ADAMS, SR.

In April 2009, we entered into an Exchange of Stock for Assets Agreement
with Mr. George Adams, Sr. ("Adams Agreement") to acquire certain assets
including, but not limited to, a United States patent, patent applications
pending in Canada, Europe, Mexico and the United States, artwork, trademarks,
equipment, furniture, databases, technical drawings, promotional materials,
trade names and inventory parts and marketing rights related to the Suntracker
One(TM) and Suntracker Two(TM) products previously owned and distributed by
Ciralight, Inc., a Utah corporation, such assets having been foreclosed on by
Mr. Adams, who was the secured creditor of Ciralight, Inc. We have no
affiliation, contractual or otherwise, with Ciralight, Inc. or any of its
employees, officers or directors.

In April 2009, we acquired all of the above described assets from Mr.
Adams, except for the United States patent, the patent applications pending in
Canada, Europe, Mexico and the United States, in exchange for 3,200,000 shares
of our common stock and 1,000,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock. In
December 2009, we acquired the United States patent and the patent applications
pending in Canada, Europe, Mexico and the United States from Mr. Adams in
exchange for the issuance by us of an additional 400,000 shares of our common
stock and a convertible promissory note in the amount of $250,000. The note was
converted into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of one share per
$.25 of outstanding principal and interest and is considered paid in full.

Our majority shareholder, George Adams, Sr., is entitled to royalty
payments of the sale of our products. During 2010, Mr. Adams voluntarily
assigned $25,860 of royalty payments due to him to our President, Jeffrey Brain,
in recognition of the hard work Mr. Brain was doing for the Company. The amount
of this royalty assignment is included in the compensation table under Executive
Compensation as "Other Compensation" to Mr. Brain.

On March 29, 2009, Mr. Adams advanced $107,168 on our behalf to
Microsun, the prior manufacturer of our products. Since that time, we repaid Mr.
Adams the total $107,168. Mr. Adams did not ask or require us to pay him
interest on the money advanced and we never issued a promissory note to Mr.
Adams related to such advance.

In April 2011, in consideration of George Adams, Sr. and his family
("Adams") agreeing to extend a $300,000 line of credit to the Company, the
Company agreed to grant Adams 300,000 stock options at an exercise price of $.50
per share, exercisable over five years.

TRANSACTIONS WITH FREDERICK FECK, ONE OF OUR DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE SECRETARY

We are currently subleasing our warehouse facility in Corona, California
for $3,000 a month pursuant to a written lease agreement dated April 1, 2010.
The written lease is on a month to month basis. The property is owned by one of
our Directors, Frederick Feck. From October 1, 2009, until March 31, 2010, we
occupied this warehouse space under a verbal lease that ran from month to month
at a rental rate of $3,000 per month. The space consists of approximately 3,500
square feet. We occupied this warehouse facility from March 1, 2009, until
September 30, 2009, on a rent free basis at the courtesy of Mr. Feck. Our board
of directors believes this new rental arrangement is fair to the Company.

On October 1, 2009, we issued a Convertible Note to Mr. Frederick Feck (one
of our directors) in the amount of $48,507.29 to evidence the our indebtedness
to Mr. Feck for his payment of $48,507.29 of the Company's expenses. Mr. Feck
paid these Company expenses between March 13, 2009, and September 15, 2009.
These expenses included salaries, consulting fees, labor, legal fees for
formation of the Company, legal and filing fees related to patents, travel
expenses and the electric bills on our Corona, California warehouse facility.
The Convertible Note issued to Mr. Feck had an interest rate of Prime Rate (as
quoted in the Wall Street Journal) plus 2% per annum. On December 1, 2009, Mr.
Feck elected to convert this note into 200,000 shares of our common stock.
Therefore, this debt to Mr. Feck has been paid in full.

TRANSACTIONS WITH DAVID E. WISE, ESQ., OUR SECURITIES ATTORNEY

In January 2010, we entered into a nonexclusive dealer agreement with
Chaparral Green Energy Solutions, LLC, an entity in which our securities
attorney, David E. Wise, Esq., owns a 50% equity interest. The terms and
conditions of the dealer agreements with Chaparral Green Energy Solutions, LLC
are the same as for our other dealer agreements. Mr. Wise also acquired certain
anti-dilution shares of our common stock as described above.

Our board of directors determined that the above agreements, arrangements
and transactions were fair to the Company.

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling
persons of the company, we have been advised by our special securities counsel
that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such
indemnification is against public policy and is, therefore, unenforceable.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration
statement on Form S-1, including exhibits, schedules and amendments, under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to the common stock to be sold
in this offering. This prospectus does not contain all of the information
contained in the registration statement. For further information about us and
the common stock to be sold in this offering, please refer to our registration
statement.

As of the effective date of our registration statement on Form S-1,
Ciralight Global became subject to the informational requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, we will file annual,
quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the
SEC. You may read and copy any document we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public
Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You should call
the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms.
Our SEC filings will also be available to the public at the SEC's web site at
http://www.sec.gov.

You may request, and we will voluntarily provide, a copy of our filings,
including our annual report, which will contain audited financial statements, at
no cost to you, by writing or telephoning us at the following address and
telephone number:

Ciralight Global, Inc., 670 E. Parkridge, Suite 112, Corona, California
92879 (877) 520-5005

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Our unaudited financial statements for the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, our audited financial statements for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to December 31, 2010 and the audited
financial statements of Old Ciralight for the fiscal years ending December 31,
2008 and 2007, follow, commencing on page F-1.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page Number
-----------
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC. AS OF
September 30, 2011 AND DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND FOR THE THREE AND
NINE MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 F-2

Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Month Periods
Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 F-3

Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2011 and 2010 F-4

Notes to Financial Statements F-5

AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC. AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009 AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM FEBRUARY 26,
2009 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2010

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm F-19

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 F-20

Statements of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2010
and for the period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2009 F-21

Statement of Changes in Stockholder's Equity for period from
February 26, 2009 (inception) to December 31, 2010 F-22

Statements of Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2010
and for the period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2009 F-23

Notes to Financial Statements F-24

AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CIRALIGHT, INC. AS OF AND FOR
THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm F-41

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 F-42

Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2008
and 2007 F-43

Statement of Changes in Stockholder's Equity (Deficit) for the
Period From December 31, 2006 to December 31, 2008 F-44

Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2008
and 2007 F-45

Notes to Financial Statements F-46

F-1

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC
BALANCE SHEETS

September 30, December 31,
2011 2010
------------ ------------
(unaudited)

ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS
Cash $ 64,482 $ 203,108
Accounts receivable 139,905 148,787
Notes receivable - related party -- 75,454
Inventory 183,891 228,106
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 98,952 53,804
------------ ------------
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 487,230 709,259

Property and equipment, net 8,627 10,024
Intangible assets, net 27,614 28,861
------------ ------------

TOTAL ASSETS $ 523,471 $ 748,144
============ ============

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable $ 39,794 $ 211,015
Advances payable - related parties 205,250 200,000
Other payables 56,182 45,372
------------ ------------
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 301,226 456,387
------------ ------------

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock - $.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized,
1,000,000 Redeemable Series A Preferred shares issued and outstanding 1,000 1,000
Common stock - $.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized,
14,292,567 and 13,289,207 shares issued and outstanding, respectively 14,293 13,289
Additional paid-in capital 2,637,983 2,132,173
Accumulated deficit (2,431,031) (1,854,705)
------------ ------------
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 222,245 291,757
------------ ------------

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 523,471 $ 748,144
============ ============

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-2

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

For the Three Months Ended For the Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
------------------------------- -------------------------------
2011 2010 2011 2010
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Sales $ 246,013 $ 205,189 $ 823,139 $ 614,182
Cost of goods sold 149,540 177,018 586,974 401,179
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Gross profit 96,473 28,171 236,166 213,003
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Operating expenses
Research and development expenses 223 28,754 31,833 45,055
Selling and marketing expenses 66,807 79,994 169,653 164,076
General and administrative expenses 208,116 186,457 582,534 695,269
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total operating expenses 275,146 295,205 784,020 904,400
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Loss from operations (178,673) (267,034) (547,854) (691,397)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Other income (expense)
Interest income (expense) (12,260) 1,410 (28,472) 4,047
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total other income (expense) (12,260) 1,410 (28,472) 4,047
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

Net loss $ (190,933) $ (265,624) $ (576,326) $ (687,350)
=========== =========== =========== ===========

Basic loss per share $ (0.01) $ (0.02) $ (0.04) $ (0.05)
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Weighted average shares used in per
share calculation 14,208,702 12,876,854 13,660,919 12,876,854
=========== =========== =========== ===========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
-------------------------------
2011 2010
---------- ----------

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Loss $ (576,326) $ (687,350)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
Common stock issued for compensation and services 25,000 178,111
Options issued for services 9,611 1,301
Options issued for financing costs 22,960 --
Depreciation and amortization 6,906 9,837
Contribution of rent from a related party 4,500 4,500
Bad debt expenses 25,896 6,909
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Decrease (increase) in inventory 44,215 (63,864)
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable (17,014) 144,005
(Increase)decrease in prepayments and deposits (45,148) 72,529
Decrease (increase) in notes receivable - related party 35,244 (3,956)
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable (131,012) 122,564
Increase in notes payable accrued interest - related parties 5,250 13,323
Increase in advances payable - related party -- 15,000
Increase in bonus payable - related party -- 25,860
Increase (decrease) in other payables 10,812 (193,373)
---------- ----------
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES (579,106) (354,604)
---------- ----------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of property and equipment (4,262) --
---------- ----------
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES (4,262) --
---------- ----------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Cash from sale of common stock 475,680 70,000
Cash from exercise of options 1,500 --
Payments of commission on sales of common stock (32,438) --
Stock offering costs -- (7,579)
Payment of related party note payable (200,000) --
Increase in related party advances 200,000 --
Proceeds from note payable - related party -- 50,000
Proceeds from note payable -- 25,000
---------- ----------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES 444,742 137,421
---------- ----------
Net decrease in cash (138,626) (217,183)

Cash, beginning of period 203,108 265,753
---------- ----------

Cash, end of period $ 64,482 $ 48,570
========== ==========
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid $ -- $ --
========== ==========
Income taxes paid $ -- $ --
========== ==========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)

1. Background:

Ciralight Global, Inc. (the "Company") was incorporated in the State of Nevada
on February 26, 2009. The Company is in the business of designing, developing,
and distributing proprietary advanced day lighting systems for traditional
non-residential markets that benefit from natural lighting.

In April 2009, we entered into an Exchange of Stock for Assets Agreement with
Mr. George Adams, Sr. ("Adams Agreement") to acquire certain assets including,
but not limited to, a U.S. patent, patent applications pending in Canada,
Europe, Mexico and the United States, artwork, trademarks, equipment, furniture,
databases, technical drawings, promotional materials, trade names and inventory
parts and marketing rights related to the Suntracker One(TM) and Suntracker
Two(TM) daylighting products previously owned and distributed by Ciralight,
Inc., a Utah corporation, such assets having been foreclosed on by Mr. Adams,
who was the secured creditor of Ciralight, Inc. Ciralight, Inc. is a predecessor
to the Company, although we have no affiliation, contractual or otherwise, with
Ciralight, Inc. or any of its employees, officers or directors.

Ciralight, Inc., the company whose assets were foreclosed on by Mr. Adams, was
also in the business of designing, developing, and distributing proprietary
advanced day lighting systems for traditional non-residential markets that
benefit from natural lighting. Ciralight, Inc. ceased operations on March 14,
2009, following the foreclosure by Mr. Adams. Since the acquisition of the
assets was through a foreclosure, the former company and its officers remain
liable for the Ciralight Inc.'s debts and the Company has no financial
responsibility for those debts. None of the employees or management of Ciralight
Inc. are involved in the Company. The business operations of our Company are
located in Irvine, California and the Company operates with four employees, the
Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer / Chief Operations Officer,
a warehouse manager and an executive assistant.

In April 2009, we acquired all of the above described assets from Mr. Adams,
except for the U.S. patent and the patent applications pending in Canada,
Europe, Mexico and the United States, in exchange for 3,200,000 shares of our
common stock and 1,000,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock. On December
15, 2009, we acquired the U.S. patent and patent applications pending in Canada,
Europe, Mexico and the United States from Mr. Adams in exchange for the issuance
by us of an additional 400,000 shares of our common stock and a convertible
promissory note in the amount of $250,000. The note is convertible into shares
of our common stock at a conversion rate of one share per $.25 of outstanding
principal and interest. As a result of this transaction, Mr. Adams is our
largest shareholder. Aside from our U.S. patent and our four pending patent
applications, we have no other patent rights.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior periods amounts to conform to
the current periods presentations.

F-5

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)

2. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America and in conformity with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8-03
of Regulation S-X and the related rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, the disclosures included in these financial statements
are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

The unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this document have
been prepared on the same basis as the annual consolidated financial statements
and in management's opinion, reflect all adjustments, including normal recurring
adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company's financial position,
results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The
unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year
ended December 31, 2010 included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September
30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that the Company will
have for any subsequent quarter or full fiscal year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.

3. Liquidity and Operations:

The Company had net losses of $576,326 and $687,350 for the nine month periods
ended September 30 2011 and 2010, respectively.

As of September 30, 2011, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $64,482.
In addition, the Company had accounts receivable of approximately $140,000,
inventory on hand at a cost valuation of approximately $184,000, with a market
valuation of over $385,000, all fully paid for, and accounts payable of
approximately $40,000. In order to satisfy the Company's short term working
capital needs for operating expenses, the Company's Board of Directors approved
the borrowing of up to $300,000 as a revolving line of credit. The revolving
line of credit consists of advances from related parties and amounted to
$200,000 as of September 30, 2011. The Company is in the process of finalizing
an agreement with the Adams in which the Company will grant one stock option for
each dollar loaned by the Adams for the maximum amount borrowed by the Company
against the line of credit. The agreement shall be for a term of one year and
the options will have an exercise price of $.50 per option, will be exercisable
over five years and will vest quarterly, based on the amount of credit line
outstanding at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the interest rate
agreed upon is 2% over the treasury rate on the outstanding amount of the credit
line.

F-6

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)

4. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Cash and Cash Equivalents - The Company considers all highly liquid debt
instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.

The Company maintains its cash accounts primarily with banks located in
California. The total cash balances are insured by the FDIC up to $250,000 per
bank. At times, the amount of the Company's cash and cash equivalent exceeds the
balance insured by the FDIC.

Accounts Receivable - The Company's accounts receivable are unsecured and the
Company is at risk to the extent such amounts become uncollectible. Management
continually monitors accounts receivable balances and provides for an allowance
for doubtful accounts at the time collection becomes questionable based on
payment history or age of the receivable. The Company sells products and
services generally on terms of receiving a 50% deposit prior to shipment and the
remaining 50% within 21 days of date of shipment. The Company charges nominal
financing fees on late payments. Accounts receivable are charged to the
allowance for bad debts when the Company has exhausted all reasonable means of
collection. At September 30, 2011, management deemed that all accounts
receivable should be fully collectible.

Inventory - Inventory consists of finished units, parts and packaging materials
and is stated at lower of historical cost or current cost. Management will
establish a reserve for damaged and discontinued inventory when determined
necessary. At September 30, 2011 no reserve was required.

Property and Equipment - Property and equipment are stated at historical cost,
which consists of the net book value of the assets carried on the prior
company's books. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the
assets using the straight-line method generally over a 3- to 5-year period.
Leasehold improvements will be amortized on the straight-line method over the
life of the related lease. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are
charged to expense as incurred. Upon retirement or disposal of assets, the cost
and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the account and any gain or
loss is reflected in the statement of operations. Depreciation expense for
property and equipment is recorded as either cost of goods sold or general and
administrative expense, depending on the use of the assets.

Stock Offering Costs - During 2010 and 2011, the Company recorded the
organizational costs associated with private placement offerings as additional
paid in capital and expensed the costs associated with taking the company
public.

Impairment of Long Lived Assets - The Company evaluates its long-lived assets
for impairment, in accordance with FASB ASC 360-10, when events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount may not be recoverable.
Impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flow on an
undiscounted basis is less than the carrying amount of the related assets. An
impairment loss is measured and recorded based on the discounted estimated
future cash flows. Changes in significant assumptions underlying future cash
flow estimates or fair values of assets may have a material effect on the
Company's financial position and results of operations. No such impairment was
indicated at September 30, 2011.

Shipping and Handling Costs - The Company includes shipping and handling costs
that are billed to our customers in revenue and the actual costs incurred for
shipping and handling are included in costs of goods sold in accordance with the
provisions of FASB ASC 605-45-45-20. The related costs are considered necessary
to complete the revenue cycle.

Revenue Recognition - The Company recognizes revenue from product sales when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, shipment has occurred, the
seller's price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and collectability is
reasonably assured.

F-7

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)

4. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (continued)

Warranty Costs - Commencing April 1, 2009, the Company provided a five-year
warranty covering the labor and materials associated with its installations.
Effective September 1, 2009, the Company changed the coverage to ten years in
the U.S. The Company's "advanced skylights" are warranted by the manufacturer
for 10 years, generally. The Company (at its option) will repair, replace or
give credit for the original purchase price on any of its products or parts. An
accrual for a loss contingency has been made, since warranty expenses to date
have been consistent and a reasonable estimate of future expenses can be made,
in accordance with FASB ASC 460-10-50-8 (c).

Changes in the liability for product warranty were as follows:

Product
Warranty
--------
Liability at December 31, 2010 $ 9,476
Settlements made during the period --
Change in liability for warranties issued during the period --
Change in liability for preexisting warranties --
--------
Liability at September 30, 2011 $ 9,476
========

Research and Development Expenses - Research and development expenses are
charged to operations in the period incurred. The amount expensed for the three
month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $223 and $28,754,
respectively.

Selling and Marketing Expenses - Selling and marketing expenses are expensed as
incurred. These expenses were $66,807 and $79,994 for the three month periods
ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Adams Agreement described in Note 1 above, also granted Mr. Adams a royalty
fee of $20.00 for each Suntracker One(TM) and Suntracker Two(TM) unit or any
future units that are based on the patent rights we acquired from him. The
maximum royalty fees payable under the Adams Agreement is $2,000,000 based on
the sale of 100,000 units. As of September 30, 2011, accrued and unpaid
royalties in the amount of $18,480, related to our sale of 924 units, are
reflected on our financial statements.

General and Administrative Expenses - General and administrative expenses are
expensed as incurred. These expenses were $208,116 and $186,457 for the three
month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Concentrations of Credit Risk - Credit risk represents the accounting loss that
would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed completely to
perform as contracted. Concentrations of credit risk (whether on or off balance
sheet) that arise from financial instruments exist for groups of customers or
counterparties when they have similar economic characteristics that would cause
their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by
changes in economic or other conditions.

Financial instruments potentially subjecting the Company to concentrations of
credit risk consist principally of accounts receivable. As of September 30,
2011, three distributors each had balances representing over 15% of the
Company's accounts receivable, including one distributors' balance which
Represented approximately 30% of the Company's accounts receivable.

Use of Estimates - The preparation of the financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the balance sheet and the reported amounts of revenue
and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include the
Company's debt discount, and share-based compensation expense. Actual results
could differ from these estimates.

F-8

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)

4. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (continued)

Stock-Based Compensation - The Company accounts for stock-based compensation
under the provisions of FASB ASC 718 (Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), "SHARE-BASED PAYMENT"), which requires the
Company to measure the stock-based compensation costs of share-based
compensation arrangements based on the grant date fair value and generally
recognizes the costs in the financial statements over the employee's requisite
service period. Stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based
compensation awards granted was based on the grant date fair value estimated in
accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 718.

The Company measures compensation expense for its non-employee stock-based
compensation under FASB ASC 505-10 and 50, "Accounting for Equity Instruments
that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with
Selling, Goods or Services". The fair value of the option issued is used to
measure the transaction, as this is more reliable than the fair value of the
services received. The fair value is measured at the value of the Company's
common stock on the date that the commitment for performance by the counterparty
has been reached or the counterparty's performance is complete. The fair value
of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and
additional paid-in capital.

By recording employee stock-based compensation using the fair value recognition
provisions of Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 718 ("ASC 718")
using the modified prospective transition method, and recording non-employee
stock-based compensation expense in accordance with ASC Topic 505, the Company
did not recognize any stock compensation expense for the three months ended
September 30, 2011.

Income Taxes - The Company accounts for its income taxes under the provisions of
FASB-ASC-10 "Accounting for Income Taxes." This statement requires the use of
the asset and liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes. Deferred
income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and
the amounts used for income tax reporting purposes, at the applicable enacted
tax rates. The Company provides a valuation allowance against its deferred tax
assets when the future realizability of the assets is no longer considered to be
more likely than not.

Convertible Notes Payable - The Company accounts for its convertible notes
payable under the provisions of FASB ASC 470 (Staff Position No. APB 14-1
"Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that may be Settled in Cash upon
Conversion (including partial cash settlement"). FASB ASC 470 clarifies that
convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion
(including partial cash settlement) are not addressed by FASB ASC 470-20-65-1
(paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, "Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt
Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants"). Additionally, FASB ASC 470 specifies that
issuers of such instruments should separately account for the liability and
equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity's nonconvertible debt
borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods.

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with FASB ASC
740-10, 30 and 270, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes." The
application of income tax law is inherently complex. As such, the Company is
required to make certain assumptions and judgments regarding its income tax
positions and the likelihood whether such tax positions would be sustained if
challenged. Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax provisions are
recorded as a component of the provision for income taxes. Interpretations and
guidance surrounding income tax laws and regulations change over time. As such,
changes in the Company's assumptions and judgments can materially affect amounts
recognized in the Company's consolidated balance sheets and statement of
operations.

F-9

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)

5. Balance Sheet Information:

Notes receivable - related party - As of December 31, 2010, the Company held a
note receivable from the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
Randall Letcavage, with an original balance of $69,865. This note accrued
interest at an annual rate of 8% from the effective date of January 15, 2010.
Certain terms of this note receivable were amended and replaced on March 18,
2010, with the following terms: The Company was granted a security interest in
and to 329,647 shares of Company common stock owned by Randall Letcavage as
collateral for the repayment of the note receivable and the note receivable is
due and payable on November 1, 2010. The balance of the note, including accrued
interest, at December 31, 2010 was $75,454. On January 3, 2011, the Company
recorded the satisfaction for the full amount of principal and accrued interest
due on the note receivable.

Inventory consisted of the following at September 30, 2011:

Finished units and components $ 161,286
Packaging crates and materials 22,605
---------
Total Inventory $ 183,891
=========

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following at September
30, 2011:

Purchase order prepaid deposits $ 82,292
Deposits on account 10,500
Exhibition deposit 6,160
---------
Total Prepayments and deposits $ 98,952
=========

Purchase order prepaid deposits represent the prepayment required under the
agreements with several suppliers of our inventory components.

Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation.
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred; additions,
renewals and betterments are capitalized. Depreciation of property and equipment
is provided using the straight-line method with estimated lives ranging from 3
to 5 years as follows:

Furniture and equipment $ 10,513
Vehicles 2,771
Tooling costs 24,683
Convention display 1,817
---------
Property and equipment 39,784
---------
Less Accumulated depreciation (31,157)
---------
Total Property and equipment, net $ 8,627
=========

Depreciation expense for the three month period ended September 30, 2011 was
$727 and was recorded as cost of goods sold. The use of the above property and
equipment determines if the depreciation is recorded as cost of goods sold or as
general and administrative expenses.

F-10

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)

5. Balance Sheet Information: (continued)

Intangible assets are stated at cost, net of accumulated amortization.
Amortization of intangible assets is provided using the straight-line method
with estimated lives of 20 years as follows:

Patent and patent applications $ 30,593
Less Accumulated amortization (2,979)
---------
Total Intangible assets, net $ 27,614
=========

Amortization expense for the three month period ended September 30, 2011 was
$416, was related to the Company's patent rights and was recorded as cost of
goods sold.

Organizational Costs - The Company's startup and organizational expenses were
expensed as legal and accounting fees under general and administrative expenses.

Advances Payable - related parties - During the first quarter of 2011, Terry
Adams and George Adams, Sr. each advanced the Company $100,000 for short term
working capital purposes, as represented by the advances payable-related parties
amount of $200,000 at September 30, 2011. The Adam's have agreed to advance the
Company up to $300,000 at an interest rate of two percent over the prime
interest rate. Interest of $2,625 has been recorded for the three months ended
September 30, 2011, making a total amount due of $205,250. On April 1, 2011, in
consideration of the Adams agreeing to offer the Company advances of up to
$300,000, the Company agreed to grant the Adams 300,000 stock options at an
exercise price of $.50 per option that will be exercisable over five years. The
options will vest over one year at 75,000 options per quarter.

Deferred Revenue - There was no amount received from
customers as of September 30, 2011, for products that had not yet been shipped
to them, since our revenue recognition policy is that revenue on our skylights
and parts is recognized when the units or parts ship to the customer.

Other Payables - As of September 30, 2011, the Company had Other Payables
consisting of the following:

Royalty fees payable $ 18,480
Accrued warranty expense 9,476
Accrued compensation 28,226
---------
Total Other payables $ 56,182
=========

Royalty Fees Payable - The Adams Agreement described in Note 1 above, granted
Mr. Adams a royalty fee of $20.00 for each Suntracker One(TM) and Suntracker
Two(TM) unit or any future units that are based on the patent rights we acquired
from him. The maximum royalty fees payable under the Adams Agreement is
$2,000,000 based on the sale of 100,000 units. The royalty fees payable amount
at September 30, 2011 was $18,480 and represents accrued royalties on 924 units
due to Mr. Adams.

Accrued Compensation - The prior Chief Executive Officer of the Company is due
$17,647 in aggregate compensation resulting from accrued compensation. The
current Chief Executive Officer of the Company is due $10,609 in aggregate
compensation resulting from an accrued bonus.

F-11

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)

6. Stockholders' Equity:

Common stock:

The Company is authorized to issue up to 50,000,000 shares of common stock with
a par value of $0.001, under terms and conditions established by the Board of
Directors.

On September 20, 2011, the Company filed a Post-Effective Amendment with the
Securities and Exchange Commission to the previously filed Form S-1 for the
purpose of updating the financial information. The Securities and Exchange
Commission deemed the Post-Effective Amendment effective on September 30, 2011.

The Company had 14,292,567 issued and outstanding common stock shares as of
September 30, 2011. Details of the issued and outstanding common stock shares
are shown below:

Amount of
Description Shares Issued
----------- -------------
Stock issued for acquisition of assets 3,600,000
Stock issued for legal services (founder's shares) 240,000
Stock issued for consulting services (founder's shares) 240,000
Stock issued as compensation (founder's shares) 1,120,000
Stock issued to private offering subscribers 6,595,360
Stock issued for compensation and services rendered 691,858
Stock issued for conversion of notes payable 1,803,349
Stock issued for exercise of stock options 2,000
----------
Total 14,292,567
==========

During the three month period ended March 31, 2010, a total of 873,858 shares of
common stock at $.25 per share were issued on January 15, 2010, consisting of
232,000 shares from sales of our stock through a Private Placement Offering,
282,353 shares as anti-dilution shares for compensation and services rendered
and 359,505 shares for accrued compensation and bonus compensation.

During the three month period ended September 30, 2010, a total of 1,576,408
shares of common stock were issued. On September 24, 2010, 1,552,408 shares of
common stock were issued, at a value of $.25 per share, resulting from the
conversion of an aggregate of $388,102 of convertible notes payable - related
parties, discussed in Note 4. In addition, from August 9, 2010 through September
30, 2010, 24,000 shares of common stock were issued, at a value of $.50 per
share, resulting from sales of our stock through a Private Placement Offering.

During the three month period ended December 31, 2010, a total of 470,941 shares
of common stock were issued, consisting of 50,941 shares at $.50 per share for
the conversion of a note payable and accrued interest in the amount of $25,470
and 420,000 shares from sales of our stock through a Private Placement Offering
at $.50 per share for an aggregate amount of $210,000.

During the three month period ended March 31, 2011, a total of 56,000 shares of
common stock at $.50 per share were issued, consisting of 6,000 shares from
sales of our stock through a Private Placement Offering and 50,000 shares for
engineering and promotional services rendered.

During the three month period ended June 30, 2011, a total of 669,000 shares of
common stock were issued, consisting of 667,000 shares, at $.50 per share, from
sales of our stock through a Private Placement Offering and 2,000 shares from
the exercise of stock options at $.75 per share.

During the three month period ended September 30, 2011, a total of 278,360
shares Of common stock were issued at $.50 per share, from sales of our stock
through a Private Placement Offering.

F-12

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)

6. Stockholders' Equity: (continued)

Preferred stock:

The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par
value $0.001 per share. Currently, we have 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock
issued and outstanding. As part of the purchase contract for the acquisition of
assets, we issued 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to the seller of
those assets, Mr. George Adams, Sr. The Series A Preferred Stock has the
following rights and preferences:

Shares Issued: 1,000,000 shares have been issued to George Adams, Sr. No other
shares of preferred stock shall be issued by the Company that would grant the
holder(s) equal or superior rights to the Series A Preferred Stock.

Voting Rights: As long as the holder of our Series A Preferred Stock owns all
1,000,000 shares of the Company's Series A Preferred Stock and at least
3,200,000 shares of the Company's common stock, such holder shall have the right
to vote 51% of the total votes necessary for the election of directors and for
any acquisition or merger transaction.

Redemption Rights: The Company will have the right to redeem shares of the
Series A Preferred Stock by paying Mr. Adams $1.00 per share. Such redemption
may occur any time the Company has money legally available for such redemption.

7. Stock Options and Warrants:

As of September 30, 2011, the Company had not issued any warrants.

In January 2010, we entered into a stock option agreement with an individual in
recognition of his past activities in the development of the products
manufactured by the Company. The individual has the option to purchase up to
75,900 shares of common stock at $.75 per share. The option expires the sooner
of one year after October 19, 2010, the effective date of the Company's
registration statement or five years from the date of the stock option
agreement.

On December 30, 2010, the Company's Board of Directors approved and adopted the
Company's 2010 Employee and Consultant Stock Incentive Plan ("Plan") and
reserved a total of 800,000 shares of common stock for issuance pursuant to the
Plan. The purpose of this Plan is to provide incentives to attract, retain and
motivate eligible persons whose present and potential contributions are
important to the success of the Company by offering them an opportunity to
participate in the Company's future performance through awards of Options,
Restricted Stock and Stock Bonuses.

F-13

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)

7. Stock Options and Warrants: (continued)

directors. Mr. Brain was granted options to purchase an aggregate of 275,000
shares of common stock. Frederick Feck, the Company's Corporate Secretary and
Director, entered into a stock option agreement for serving on the Company's
board of directors and was granted options to purchase 100,000 shares of common
stock. Jacqui Matsumoto, a Company employee, entered into a stock option
agreement for significant contributions to the Company and was granted options
to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock. David E. Wise, the Company's
corporate securities counsel, entered into a stock option agreement for legal
services to the Company and was granted options to purchase 100,000 shares of
common stock. Terry Adams, a Company founder and investor, entered into a stock
option agreement for significant contributions to the Company and was granted
options to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock.

Stock options exercisable into an aggregate of 680,900 shares of the Company's
common stock were outstanding on December 31, 2010, of which 580,900 were vested
on the date granted and 100,000 are scheduled to vest during 2011. No options
were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2010. The Black-Scholes
option-pricing model was used to estimate the option fair values , in accordance
with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation -- Transition and Disclosure." This
option-pricing model requires a number of assumptions, of which the most
significant are, expected stock price volatility, the expected pre-vesting
forfeiture rate and the expected option term (the amount of time from the grant
date until the options are exercised or expire). Since the Company's stock is
not yet trading nor does it have an extended history of stock prices or
volatility, expected volatility and average contractual life variables were
estimated utilizing a weighted average of comparable published volatilities and
contractual lives based on industry comparables. Expected pre-vesting
forfeitures were estimated based on expected employee turnover. The fair value
of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2010 was estimated as of
the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions: a dividend yield of zero percent, an expected volatility of between
70.5% and 71.5%, a risk-free interest rate of 0% and a remaining contractual
life of between 1.0 and 5.0 years.

In April 2011, in consideration of the Adams agreeing to offer the Company
advances up to $300,000, the Company agreed to grant the Adams 300,000 stock
options at an exercise price of $.50 per option that will be exercisable over
five years. The options will vest over one year at 75,000 options per quarter.
In addition, 2000 stock options were exercised at $.75 per option during April
2011.

The following table summarizes the activity of stock options for the nine months
ended September 30, 2011:

Weighted
Number of Average
Shares Exercise
Outstanding Price
----------- -----
Balance, December 31, 2010 680,900 $ .46
Options granted 300,000 .50
Options exercised (2,000) .75
Options forfeited or expired -- --
-------- ------
Balance, September 30, 2011 978,900 $ .47
======== ======

F-14

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)

7. Stock Options and Warrants: (continued)

The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year ended
December 31, 2010 was $0.09 per option and there were no options exercised
during the same period. During the three months ended September 30, 2011, 7,143
options vested for services and 75,000 options vested for financing costs. The
value recorded for the outstanding exercisable options at September 30, 2011 was
$12,167.

8. Commitments and Contingencies:

Operating Leases -- The Company has not entered into any long term leases. The
Company is currently leasing approximately 3,500 square feet of warehouse space
in Corona, California, on a verbal month to month basis from one of our
Directors, Frederick Feck. Commencing October 1, 2009, the Company paid $3,000
per month for the Corona, California warehouse space. For business office space,
the Company has chosen to share space with iCapital to reduce its administrative
cost by sharing costs, avoiding setup costs for phones, internet, furnishings,
etc as well as office staffing. Commencing May 1, 2009, the Company paid $3,000
per month for the office space which is located in Irvine, California on a
verbal month to month lease. Commencing April 1, 2010, we began renting an
executive suite in Corona, California for $150 a month on a month to month basis
and terminated the arrangement and rental payments for the executive offices in
Irvine, California.

In February 2010, we entered into an eighteen month services agreement with a
construction data company regarding Smart BIM; the construction and maintenance
of databases relating to customers, sales leads and marketing strategies. As a
result of the agreement, commencing April 1, 2010, we pay $1,140 per month for a
period of eighteen months.

The company entered into a Private Label Agreement with Firestone Building
Products, in which Firestone Building Products will purchase the Company
products and resell them under the Firestone brand label. Firestone Building
Products is one of the largest roofing system manufacturer's in the United
States with sales in excess of $1.2 billion per year. They will market and sell
the Company products through the Roofing Industry channel.

The Company, as of September 30, 2011 has no additional financial commitments
that would represent long term commitments on behalf of the Company.

Capital Leases - The Company has not entered into any kind of capital leases for
furnishings, equipment or for any other purposes.

Prepaid Inventory - Our agreements with several of our inventory component
suppliers generally provide that between 50% and 60% of the purchase order price
is due upon the placement of an order, with the remaining balance due upon
completion and shipment of the order, normally within 30 days. Purchase order
prepaid deposits are included in the balance sheet as Prepaid expenses and other
current assets. As of September 30, 2011, purchase order prepaid deposits
totaled $82,292 with primarily five of our major suppliers.

F-15

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)

9. Related Party Transactions:

As described in Note 7, above, the Company leases warehouse space from one of
our directors, Frederick Feck and a portion of our CEO, Jeffrey Brain's,
residence is utilized as an office. The Company has recorded contributed capital
of $4,500 relating to the value of the use of the residence for the benefit of
the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

In January 2010, we entered into a nonexclusive distributorship agreement with
Chaparral Green Energy Solutions, LLC, an entity in which our securities
attorney, David E. Wise, Esq., owns a 50% equity interest. This non-exclusive
dealer agreement with the Company is to sell products in Texas and is on the
same terms, conditions and pricing as other dealer agreements. Thus, Mr. Wise's
company will not receive any beneficial or special treatment over our other
dealers or distributors.

The terms and conditions of the dealer agreement with Chaparral Green Energy
Solutions, LLC are the same as for the other dealer and distributorship
agreements. Therefore, the agreement with Chaparral Green Energy Solutions, LLC
does not contain preferential or more favorable terms or conditions than
agreements with our other dealers or distributors.

In January 2010, we also entered into nonexclusive dealer agreements with both
Green Tech Design-Build, Inc., an entity located in Salt lake City, Utah, and
Eco-Smart, Inc., an entity located in Sarasota, Florida. In addition, we entered
into an exclusive international distribution agreement with Zeev Shimon & Sons,
Ltd., an entity located in Petah-Tikva, Israel.

During the first quarter of 2011, Terry Adams and George Adams, Sr. each
advanced the Company $100,000 for short term working capital purposes, as
represented by the advances payable-related parties amount of $200,000 at June
30, 2011. The Adam's have agreed to advance the Company up to $300,000 at an
interest rate of two percent over the prime interest rate. Interest of $2,625
has been recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2011, making a total
amount due of $202,625. On April 1, 2011, in consideration of the Adams agreeing
to offer the Company advances of up to $300,000, the Company agreed to grant the
Adams 300,000 stock options at an exercise price of $.50 per option that will be
exercisable over five years. The options will vest over one year at 75,000
options per quarter.

10. Share Based Compensation:

F-16

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)

10. Share Based Compensation: (continued)

aggregate compensation resulting from $3,000 per month accrued for each of them
from March through December 2009. In addition, the Chief Financial Officer was
due additional compensation of $29,876 for the period from February 26, 2009
(inception) to December 31, 2009. Our board of directors granted anti-dilution
rights to Jeffrey Brain, iCapital Finance, Inc. (a company owned by Randall
Letcavage, our former Chief Executive Officer, and his business partner,
Rosemary Nguyen), Randall Letcavage and David E. Wise, our securities counsel.
These anti-dilution rights entitled Jeffrey Brain, iCapital Finance, Inc.,
Randall Letcavage and David E. Wise to acquire additional shares of our common
stock at $.25 per share in order to maintain their original percentage ownership
in the our common stock. The rights entitled the holders to acquire additional
shares as a result of the private offering conducted by the Company. The
anti-dilution rights agreement entitled the holders to acquire their additional
shares prior to March 31, 2010, at the same share price of $.25 that subscribers
were purchasing stock for in the private offering. The holders exercised their
rights during December 2009.

11. Legal Matters:

On October 15, 2009, we filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of
California for the County of Orange, Central Justice Center (Case No. 30-2009,
00314998) ("Complaint") against Jacque Stevens, Rex Miller, Greg Schmalz, A-1
Daylighting, Consultech, Daylight Specialist and DOES 1-25. The Complaint
includes five causes of action by us against the defendants: Tortious
Interference with Contract, Commercial Disparagement, Conspiracy, Breach of
Contract, Unfair Business Practices and Libel. The Complaint alleges that we
entered into a nondisclosure agreement as part of an agreement to work toward
completing a joint venture/private label of our solar lighting systems with
Firestone Building Products and that defendants attempted to interfere with our
business relationship with Firestone Building Products by disparaging our
products (misrepresentations regarding prior sales, installations and quality of
service and that we provided or substituted defective or improper parts in our
products). We are seeking general, special and punitive or exemplary damages and
injunctive relief against the defendants.

While some of the defendants have answered the Complaint, none of them has filed
a counterclaim against us in this case. We are in settlement negotiations with
various defendants in this case. Recently, we dismissed Defendant Greg Schmaltz
from the case as a result of a settlement agreement with Defendant Schmaltz
pursuant to which we released him from any liability to us and he, in turn,
released us from any liability to him or his company, First Team Marketing and
Communications. As a result of this settlement agreement, Defendant Schmalz
dismissed Lawsuits A and B described below. We do not believe we have any legal
exposure in this case.

On January 14, 2010, we were served with process in two lawsuits, which we
deemed to be frivolous. Both of these lawsuits were filed in the Superior Court
of the State of California for the County of Orange, Central Justice Center
(Case No. 30-2010, 00334139) ("Lawsuit A"). Lawsuit A is styled First Team
Marketing and Communications vs. Ciralight Global, Inc., Ciralight, Inc. and
DOES 1-25. Lawsuit A is a suit on an open book account in the amount of
approximately $62,000. We believe that this suit should have been brought
against Ciralight, Inc., a defunct corporation, with whom we have no affiliation
or relationship. The second of these lawsuits (Case No. 30-2010, 003344479)
("Lawsuit B") is styled Greg Schmalz Consultants LLC vs. Ciralight Global, Inc.,
Ciralight, Inc. and DOES 1-25. Lawsuit B is a suit on an open book account in
the amount of approximately $34,000. As discussed above, Lawsuits A and B have
been dismissed.

F-17

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)

12. Subsequent Events:

The Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events in accordance with
ASC Topic 855. Other than the events noted below, the Company is not aware of
any subsequent events which would require recognition or disclosure in the
financial statements.

Subsequent to September 30, 2011, the Company has continued to enter into Dealer
Agreements with authorized dealers regarding the sale, installation and
servicing of our products.

F-18

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of
Ciralight Global, Inc.
Irvine, California

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Ciralight Global, Inc. as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010 and
for the period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to December 31, 2009. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Ciralight Global, Inc. as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for the year ended December 31, 2010 and for the period from February 26, 2009
(inception) to December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.

/s/ HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP
--------------------------------------------
HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP
Salt Lake City, Utah
March 24, 2011

F-19

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC
BALANCE SHEETS

December 31,
2010 2009
---------- ----------

ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash $ 203,108 $ 265,753
Accounts receivable 148,787 300,547
Notes receivable - related party 75,454 69,865
Inventory 228,106 176,521
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 53,804 135,391
---------- ----------
Total current assets 709,259 948,077
---------- ----------
Property and equipment, net 10,024 20,337
Intangible assets, net 28,861 30,523
---------- ----------

Total assets $ 748,144 $ 998,937
========== ==========

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 211,015 $ 54,419
Advances payable - related party 200,000 --
Convertible note payable -- 324,927
Other payables 45,372 202,847
---------- ----------
Total current liabilities 456,387 582,193
---------- ----------

Stockholders' equity
Preferred stock - $.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized,
1,000,000 Redeemable Series A Preferred shares issued and outstanding 1,000 1,000
Common stock - $.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized,
13,289,207 and 10,368,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively 13,289 10,368
Additional paid-in capital 2,132,173 1,225,665
Accumulated deficit (1,854,705) (820,289)
---------- ----------
Total stockholders' equity 291,757 416,744
---------- ----------

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 748,144 $ 998,937
========== ==========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-20

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the period from
For the February 26, 2009
Year Ended (inception) to
December 31, December 31,
2010 2009
------------ ------------

Sales $ 774,105 $ 640,425

Cost of goods sold 609,796 563,249
------------ ------------
Gross profit 164,309 77,176
------------ ------------

Operating expenses
Research and development expenses 61,459 22,229
Selling and marketing expenses 211,151 72,847
General and administrative expenses 916,501 799,794
------------ ------------
Total operating expenses 1,189,111 894,870
------------ ------------

Loss from operations (1,024,802) (817,694)
------------ ------------

Other income
Interest expense (net) (9,614) (2,595)
------------ ------------
Total other expense (9,614) (2,595)
------------ ------------

Net loss $ (1,034,416) $ (820,289)
============ ============

Basic and diluted loss per share $ (0.09) $ (0.11)
============ ============

Weighted average shares used in per share calculation 11,729,651 7,543,444
============ ============

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-21

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
For the period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to December 31, 2010

Common Stock Preferred Stock
---------------- --------------- Additional
Par Par Paid in Accumulated Total
Shares Value Shares Value Capital Deficit Equity
------ ----- ------ ----- ------- ------- ------

BALANCE AT INCEPTION FEBRUARY 26, 2009 -- $ -- -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --

Issuance of Founder's Shares 1,600,000 1,600 -- -- (1,600) -- --

Common Stock Issued For Asset Acquisition
at predecessor cost of $0.09 (Note 5) 3,200,000 3,200 -- -- 224,282 -- 227,482

Preferred Stock Issued For Asset
Acquisition at $0.01 (Note 5) -- -- 1,000,000 1,000 -- -- 1,000

Common Stock Issued For Private
Placement at $0.25 4,968,000 4,968 -- -- 1,237,032 -- 1,242,000

Stock Offering Costs -- -- -- -- (9,874) -- (9,874)

Common Stock Issued For Asset Acquisition
at predecessor cost (Note 5) 400,000 400 -- -- (291,975) -- (291,575)

Common Stock Issued For Conversion
of Note Payable and Interest at $0.25 200,000 200 -- -- 49,800 -- 50,000

Rent Donation By Related Party -- -- -- -- 18,000 -- 18,000

Net Loss -- -- -- -- -- (820,289) (820,289)
---------- ------- --------- ------- ---------- ----------- -----------
BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2009 10,368,000 10,368 1,000,000 1,000 1,225,665 (820,289) 416,744

Common Stock Issued For Private
Placement at $0.25 232,000 232 -- -- 57,768 -- 58,000

Common Stock Issued For Private
Placement at $0.50 444,000 444 -- -- 221,556 -- 222,000

Common Stock Issued As Anti-Dilution
Shares For Compensation And Services
Rendered at $0.25 282,353 282 -- -- 70,306 -- 70,588

Common Stock Issued For Accrued
Compensation at $0.25 359,505 359 -- -- 89,517 -- 89,876

Common Stock Issued For Conversion
of Notes Payable and Interest at $0.25 1,552,408 1,553 -- -- 386,549 -- 388,102

Common Stock Issued For Conversion
of Notes Payable and Interest at $0.50 50,941 51 -- -- 25,419 -- 25,470

Stock Options Issued For Services -- -- -- -- 51,574 -- 51,574

Stock Offering Costs -- -- -- -- (2,181) -- (2,181)

Rent Donation by Related Party -- -- -- -- 6,000 -- 6,000

Net Loss -- -- -- -- -- (1,034,416) (1,034,416)
---------- ------- --------- ------- ---------- ----------- -----------

BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2010 13,289,207 $13,289 1,000,000 $ 1,000 $2,132,173 $(1,854,705) $ 291,757
========== ======= ========= ======= ========== =========== ===========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-22

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the period from
For the Year February 26, 2009
Ended (inception) to
December 31, December 31,
2010 2009
------------ ------------

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net Loss $ (1,034,416) $ (820,289)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities:
Options issued for services 51,574 --
Depreciation and amortization 11,976 15,254
Contribution of rent from a related party 6,000 18,000
Bad debt expense 39,273 30
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Increase in inventory (51,585) (17,425)
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable 112,487 (270,817)
Decrease (increase) in prepayments and deposits 81,587 (135,391)
Increase in note receivable - related party (5,589) (69,865)
Increase in accounts payable 156,596 54,419
(Decrease) increase in other payables 16,633 140,916
------------ ------------
Net cash used in operating activities (615,464) ( 1,085,168)
------------ ------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of business assets -- (3,500)
------------ ------------
Net cash used in investing activities -- (3,500)
------------ ------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Cash from sale of common stock 280,000 1,242,000
Proceeds from note payable 275,000 122,295
Stock offering costs (2,181) (9,874)
------------ ------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 552,819 1,354,421
------------ ------------

Net (decrease) increase in cash (62,645) 265,753

Cash, beginning of period 265,753 --
------------ ------------

Cash, end of period $ 203,108 $ 265,753
============ ============

Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid $ 9,614 $ 2,632
============ ============
Income taxes paid $ -- $ --
============ ============

Non-cash investing and financing activities
Common stock issued for accrued compensation $ 89,876 $ 1,600
============ ============
Debt and liabilities settled with common stock $ 484,160 $ 50,000
============ ============
Accrued interest expense added to principal amount of debt $ 14,783 $ --
============ ============

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-23

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

1. Background and Basis of Presentation:

In April 2009, we entered into an Exchange of Stock for Assets Agreement with
Mr. George Adams, Sr. ("Adams Agreement") to acquire certain assets including,
but not limited to, a U.S. patent, patent applications pending in Canada,
Europe, Mexico and the United States, artwork, trademarks, equipment, furniture,
databases, technical drawings, promotional materials, trade names and inventory
parts and marketing rights related to the Suntracker One(TM) and Suntracker
Two(TM) daylighting products previously owned and distributed by Ciralight,
Inc., a Utah corporation, such assets having been foreclosed on by Mr. Adams,
who was the secured creditor of Ciralight, Inc. Ciralight, Inc. is a predecessor
to the Company, although we have no affiliation, contractual or otherwise, with
Ciralight, Inc. or any of its employees, officers or directors.

In order to provide working capital, Ciralight Global, Inc. sold common stock
through a private placement that raised $1,300,000 with the sale of 5,200,000
shares at a price of $0.25 per share from April 30, 2009 and January 15, 2010.
During the third and fourth quarters of 2010, the Company sold common stock
through a private placement that raised $222,000 with the sale of 444,000 shares
at a price of $0.50 per share.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year income statement amounts
to conform to the current year presentation.

2. Liquidity and Operations:

The Company had net losses of $1,034,416 and $820,289, for the year ended
December 31, 2010 and for the period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2009, respectively.

F-24

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

2. Liquidity and Operations: (continued)

As of December 31, 2010, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $203,000. In addition, the Company had accounts receivable of
approximately $149,000, inventory on hand at a cost valuation of approximately
$228,000, with a market valuation of over $475,000, all fully paid for, and
accounts payable of approximately $211,000. As of March 15, 2011, with orders
for over 700 units scheduled to be shipped during the next six months, the
Company is confident that it has sufficient liquidity for the next twelve
months.

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Concentration of Cash Risk

The Company maintains its cash accounts primarily with banks located in Utah.
The total cash balances are insured by the FDIC up to $250,000 per bank. At
times, the amount of the Company's cash and cash equivalent exceeds the balance
insured by the FDIC.

Accounts Receivable - The Company's accounts receivable are unsecured and the
Company is at risk to the extent such amounts become uncollectible. Management
continually monitors accounts receivable balances and provides for an allowance
for doubtful accounts at the time collection becomes questionable based on
payment history or age of the receivable. The Company sells products and
services generally on terms of receiving a 50% deposit prior to shipment and the
remaining 50% within 21 days of date of shipment. The Company charges nominal
financing fees on late payments. Accounts receivable are charged to the
allowance for bad debts when the Company has exhausted all reasonable means of
collection. At December 31, 2010, management deemed that all accounts receivable
were fully collectible and that no bad debt reserve was required.

Stock Offering Costs - During 2009 and 2010, the Company recorded the
organizational costs associated with the private placement offering as
additional paid in capital and expensed the costs associated with taking the
company public.

F-25

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (continued)

Changes in the liability for product warranty were as follows:

Product
Warranty
--------
Liability at February 26, 2009 (inception) $ --
Settlements made during the period (3,355)
Change in liability for warranties issued during the period 12,358
Change in liability for preexisting warranties 473
--------
Liability at December 31, 2009 9,476

Settlements made during the period (7,425)
Change in liability for warranties issued during the period 4,415
Change in liability for preexisting warranties 3,010
--------

Liability at December 31, 2010 $ 9,476
========

Research and Development Expenses - Research and development expenses are
charged to operations in the period incurred. The amounts expensed for the year
ended December 31, 2010 and for the period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2009 were $61,459 and $22,229, respectively.

Selling and Marketing Expenses - Selling and marketing expenses are expensed as
incurred. These expenses were $211,151 and $72,847, respectively, for the year
ended December 31, 2010 and for the period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2009 and consisted of the following:

2010 2009
-------- --------
Booth rental and advertising fees $ 17,367 $ 16,570
Event staffing, travel and shipping 25,705 22,193
Marketing consultants and materials 29,326 10,665
Royalty fees 13,240 15,260
Commissions 111,393 6,736
Sales support, recruitment and travel 14,120 1,423
-------- --------

Total Selling and Marketing Expenses $211,151 $ 72,847
======== ========

F-26

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (continued)

The Adams Agreement described in Note 1 above, also granted Mr. Adams a royalty
fee of $20.00 for each Suntracker One(TM) and Suntracker Two(TM) unit or any
future units that are based on the patent rights we acquired from him. The
maximum royalty fees payable under the Adams Agreement is $2,000,000 based on
the sale of 100,000 units. At December 31, 2010, accrued royalties totaled
$18,249.

General and Administrative Expenses - General and administrative expenses are
expensed as incurred. These expenses were $916,870 and $799,794, respectively,
for the year ended December 31, 2010 and for the period from February 26, 2009
(inception) to December 31, 2009 and consisted of the following:

2010 2009
-------- --------
Depreciation and amortization $ 11,976 $ 1,817
Computer and internet 13,042 9,567
Insurance 32,824 4,811
Membership fees 6,445 4,260
Payroll and compensation 340,096 385,240
Accounting fees 104,728 61,204
Legal fees 152,871 74,012
Consulting fees 89,018 171,573
Rent and occupancy expenses 20,186 54,450
Warehouse expenses 54,706 11,083
Travel expenses 21,839 10,195
Interest expense 6,249 0
Office and administrative expenses 23,248 11,552
Bad debt expense 39,273 30
-------- --------

Total General & Administrative Expenses $916,501 $799,794
======== ========

Financial instruments potentially subjecting the Company to concentrations of
credit risk consist principally of accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2010,
two distributors had balances representing 22% or more of the Company's accounts
receivable.

F-27

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (continued)

The Company recognizes stock compensation expense by recording employee
stock-based compensation using the fair value recognition provisions of
Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 718 ("ASC 718") using the
modified prospective transition method, and recording non-employee stock-based
compensation expense in accordance with ASC Topic 505.

F-28

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

4. Balance Sheet Information:

Cash and Cash Equivalents consisted of the following at December 31,

2010 2009
-------- --------
Checking account $201,376 $265,583
Savings accounts 502 76
Petty cash 1,230 94
-------- --------

Total Cash and cash equivalents $203,108 $265,753
======== ========

Notes receivable - related party - As of December 31, 2010, the Company holds a
note receivable from the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
Randall Letcavage, with an original balance of $69,865. This note accrues
interest at an annual rate of 8% from the effective date of January 15, 2010.
Certain terms of this note receivable were amended and replaced on March 18,
2010, with the following terms: The Company was granted a security interest in
and to 329,647 shares of Company common stock owned by Randall Letcavage as
collateral for the repayment of the note receivable and the note receivable is
due and payable on November 1, 2010. The balance of the note, including accrued
interest, at December 31, 2010 was $75,454. Subsequent to December 31, 2010,
during the first quarter of 2011, the Company recorded the satisfaction for the
full amount of principal and accrued interest due on the note receivable.

Inventory consisted of the following at December 31,

2010 2009
-------- --------
Finished units and components $205,501 $153,916
Packaging crates and materials 22,605 22,605
-------- --------

Total Inventory $228,106 $176,521
======== ========

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following at December
31,

2010 2009
-------- --------
Purchase order prepaid deposits $ 43,304 $ 98,468
Deposits on account 10,500 3,000
Private offering costs -- 33,823
Employee advances -- 100
-------- --------

Total Prepayments and deposits $ 53,804 $135,391
======== ========

Purchase order prepaid deposits represent the prepayment required under the
agreements with several suppliers of our inventory components.

F-29

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

4. Balance Sheet Information: (continued)

2010 2009
-------- --------
Furniture and equipment $ 7,950 $ 7,950
Vehicles 2,771 2,771
Tooling costs 22,983 22,983
Convention display 1,817 1,817
-------- --------
Property and equipment 35,521 35,521
-------- --------
Less Accumulated depreciation (25,497) (15,184)
-------- --------

Total Property and equipment, net $ 10,024 $ 20,337
======== ========

Depreciation expense for the annual periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was
$10,313 and $15,184, respectively, and was recorded as cost of goods sold. The
use of the above property and equipment determines if the depreciation is
recorded as cost of goods sold or as general and administrative expenses.

Intangible assets are stated at cost, net of accumulated amortization.
Amortization of intangible assets is provided using the straight-line method
with estimated lives of 20 years as follows at Decmber 31,

2010 2009
-------- --------
Patent and patent applications $ 30,593 $ 30,593
Less Accumulated amortization (1,732) (70)
-------- --------

Total Intangible assets, net $ 28,861 $ 30,523
======== ========

Amortization expense for the annual periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was
$1,663 and $69, respectively, was related to the Company's patent rights and was
recorded as cost of goods sold.

Organizational Costs - The Company's startup and organizational expenses were
expensed as legal and accounting fees under general and administrative expenses.

Advances payable-related party - On December 30,2010, Terry Adams advanced the
Company $200,000 for short term working capital purposes, as represented by the
advances payable-related party amount of $200,000 at December 31, 2010. The
Company repaid the $200,000 advance to Terry Adams on January 5, 2011.

F-30

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

4. Balance Sheet Information: (continued)

Convertible Notes Payable - Related Parties - The Company had Convertible Notes
Payable - Related Parties consisting of the following at December 31,

2010 2009
-------- --------
Note payable - George Adams, Sr $ -- $250,547
Note payable - Terry Adams -- 74,380
-------- --------

Total Convertible notes payable - related parties $ -- $324,927
======== ========

Notes Payable:

As of March 31, 2009, the Company had a loan payable to Mr. Feck, one of the
Company's directors, in the amount of $35,629, relating to his payments of
certain Company general and administrative expenses between March 13, 2009 and
March 31, 2009. At September 30, 2009, the Company had a loan payable to Mr.
Feck in the amount of $48,507, relating to his payments of certain Company
expenses between March 13, 2009 and September 15, 2009. On October 1, 2009 the
loan was converted into a convertible note, which was issued to Mr. Feck. On
December 1, 2009, Mr. Feck elected to convert the principal and accrued interest
on this note into 200,000 shares of our common stock at $0.25 per share.

As of December 31, 2010, the Company had issued two Notes Payable with related
parties. On December 15, 2009, the Company secured the title to the one U.S.
patent and patent applications pending in Canada, Europe, Mexico and the United
States as provided in the Adams Agreement, described in Note 1, above. As
required in the Adams Agreement, as amended, on December 15, 2009, the Company
executed a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $250,000 to Mr. Adams
and issued to Mr. Adams an additional 400,000 shares of common stock in
consideration of Mr. Adams' transfer of ownership of the U.S. patent and the
patent applications pending in Canada, Europe, Mexico and the United States to
the Company. The $250,000 note with Mr. Adams bears interest at the prime rate
plus 2%, is due on December 15, 2012 and Mr. Adams has the right to convert the
principal amount of the note into shares of the Company's common stock at $0.25
per share. The balance of the note, including accrued interest, at December 31,
2009 was $250,547. In addition, Terry Adams, the son of Mr. George Adams, Sr.,
loaned the Company $73,788 on November 5, 2009 in exchange for a Convertible
Promissory Note for the amount loaned. The $73,788 note with Terry Adams bears
interest at the prime rate plus 2%, is due on December 15, 2012 and Terry Adams
has the right to convert the principal amount of the note into shares of the
Company's common stock at $.25 per share. The balance of the note, including
accrued interest, at March 31, 2010 was $74,380. During the third quarter of
2010, the note holders elected to convert the principal and accrued interest on
their notes into common stock shares of the Company at $0.25 per share.

On August 20, 2010, the Company executed a Convertible Promissory Note in the
amount of $25,000 to Mr. Iwata. The $25,000 note with Mr. Iwata bears interest
at the prime rate plus 2%, is due on August 19, 2012 and Mr. Iwata has the right
to convert the principal amount of the note into shares of the Company's common
stock at $.50 per share. During the fourth quarter of 2010, Mr. Iwata elected to
convert the principal and accrued interest on this note into 50,941 shares of
our common stock at $0.50 per share.

F-31

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

4. Balance Sheet Information: (continued)

Other Payables - The Company had Other Payables consisting of the following at
December 31,

2010 2009
-------- --------
Royalty fees payable $ 18,249 $ 15,260
Accrued warranty expense 9,476 9,476
Accrued compensation 17,647 178,111
-------- --------

Total Other payables $ 45,372 $202,847
======== ========

Royalty Fees Payable - The Adams Agreement described in Note 1 above, granted
Mr. Adams a royalty fee of $20.00 for each Suntracker One(TM) and Suntracker
Two(TM) unit or any future units that are based on the patent rights we acquired
from him. The maximum royalty fees payable under the Adams Agreement is
$2,000,000 based on the sale of 100,000 units. At December 31, 2010, accrued
royalties totaled $18,249.

Accrued Compensation - The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company were each due $30,000 in aggregate compensation resulting from
$3,000 per month accrued for each of them from March through December 2009. In
addition, the Chief Financial Officer was due additional compensation of $29,876
for the period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to December 31, 2009.
Additionally, the Company accrued $88,235 relating to anti dilution rights which
was converted to common stock in January, 2010.

5. Stockholders' Equity:

Common stock:

The Company is authorized to issue up to 50,000,000 shares of common stock with
a par value of $0.001, under terms and conditions established by the Board of
Directors.

The Company had 13,289,207 issued and outstanding common stock shares as of
December 31, 2010. Details of the issued and outstanding common stock shares are
shown below.

Common stock shares issued as of December 31, 2010 are as follows:

Amount of
Shares
Description Issued
----------- ----------
Stock issued for acquisition of assets 3,600,000
Stock issued for legal services (founder's shares) 240,000
Stock issued for consulting services (founder's shares) 240,000
Stock issued as compensation (founder's shares) 1,120,000
Stock issued to private offering subscribers 5,644,000
Stock issued for compensation and services rendered 641,878
Stock issued for conversion of note payable 1,803,349
----------

Total common stock shares issued 13,289,207
==========

F-32

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

5. Stockholders' Equity: (continued)

On April 1, 2009, 3,200,000 shares of common stock were issued, at a value of
$.09 per share, as a result of the Adams Agreement, described in Note 1, above.
On April 1, 2009, 1,600,000 shares of common stock were issued as founder's
shares, at a value of $.00 per share, for compensation expense and legal and
consulting services rendered in the formation of the Company and for
developmental work on our business plan. During the period from April 1, 2009 to
December 31, 2009, 4,968,000 shares of common stock were issued, at a value of
$.25 per share, resulting from sales of our stock through a Private Placement
Offering. On December 1, 2009, 200,000 shares of common stock were issued, at a
value of $.25 per share, resulting from the conversion of a $50,000 note
payable, discussed in Note 8. In addition, also a result of the Adams Agreement,
described in Notes 1 and 4, above, 400,000 shares of common stock were issued.

The assets acquired, as a result of the Adams Agreement, described in Notes 1
and 4, above, were in exchange for consideration of $354,200. The consideration
consisted of 3,200,000 shares of common stock at $.09 per share equaling
$288,000; 400,000 shares of common stock at $.25 per share equaling $100,000;
1,000,000 shares of preferred stock at par value equaling $1,000 and a note
payable of $250,000. The assets acquired consisted of inventory, accounts
receivable, property and equipment, a U.S. patent and patent applications
pending in Canada, Europe, Mexico and the United States at a value of $274,076.
The assets acquired were valued at their predecessor values, since George Adams
was a related party of the predecessor company. Management recognized additional
paid in capital for the difference of $80,124 between the predecessor value of
the assets acquired and the value of the consideration paid, as additional
acquisition costs, in order to properly recognize the predecessor cost of the
assets involved and for other costs associated with this transaction.

During the three month period ended March 31, 2010, a total of 944,446 shares of
common stock at $.25 per share were issued on January 15, 2010, consisting of
232,000 shares from sales of our stock through a Private Placement Offering,
282,353 shares as anti-dilution shares for compensation and services rendered
and 359,505 shares for accrued compensation and bonus compensation.

During the three month period ended September 30, 2010, a total of 1,576,408
shares of common stock were issued, consisting of 1,552,408 shares at $.25 per
share for the conversion of notes payable and accrued interest for the aggregate
amount of $388,102 and 24,000 shares from sales of our stock through a Private
Placement Offering at $.50 per share for an aggregate amount of $12,000.

Preferred stock:

F-33

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

5. Stockholders' Equity: (continued)

6. Stock Options and Warrants:

As of December 31, 2010, the Company had not issued any warrants.

In January 2010, we entered into a stock option agreement with an individual in
recognition of his past activities in the development of the products
manufactured by the Company. The individual has the option to purchase up to
75,900 shares of common stock at $.75 per share. The option expires the sooner
of one year after the effective date of the Company's registration statement and
the stock begins trading or five years from the date of the stock option
agreement.

On December 30, 2010, the Company's Board of Directors approved and adopted the
Company's 2010 Employee and Consultant Stock Incentive Plan ("Plan") and
reserved a total of 800,000 shares of common stock for issuance pursuant to the
Plan. The purpose of this Plan is to provide incentives to attract, retain and
motivate eligible persons whose present and potential contributions are
important to the success of the Company by offering them an opportunity to
participate in the Company's future performance through awards of Options,
Restricted Stock and Stock Bonuses.

On December 30, 2010, the Board of Directors granted a total of 605,000 options
at an exercise price of $.425 per share, exercisable over five years from the
date of grant. We entered into eight stock option agreements with five
individuals in recognition of various services performed for the Company. The
individuals have the option to purchase a certain amount of shares of common
stock at $.425 per share. The options expire on December 15,2015. Jeffrey S.
Brain, the Company's President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, entered
into four stock option agreements relating to assisting the Company with its
registration process and becoming a publicly traded Company, entering into a
certain contract with a major customer and for serving on the Company's board of
directors. Mr. Brain was granted options to purchase an aggregate of 275,000
shares of common stock. Frederick Feck, the Company's Corporate Secretary and
Director, entered into a stock option agreement for serving on the Company's
board of directors and was granted options to purchase 100,000 shares of common
stock. Jacqui Matsumoto, a Company employee, entered into a stock option
agreement for significant contributions to the Company and was granted options
to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock. David E. Wise, the Company's
corporate securities counsel, entered into a stock option agreement for legal
services to the Company and was granted options to purchase 100,000 shares of
common stock. Terry Adams, a Company founder and investor, entered into a stock
option agreement for significant contributions to the Company and was granted
options to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock.

F-34

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

6. Stock Options and Warrants: (continued)

significant are, expected stock price volatility, the expected pre-vesting
forfeiture rate and the expected option term (the amount of time from the grant
date until the options are exercised or expire). Since the Company's stock is
not yet trading nor does it have an extended history of stock prices or
volatility, expected volatility and average contractual life variables were
estimated utilizing a weighted average of comparable published volatilities and
contractual lives based on industry comparables. Expected pre-vesting
forfeitures were estimated based on expected employee turnover. The fair value
of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2010 was estimated as of
the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions: a dividend yield of zero percent, an expected volatility of between
70.5% and 71.5%, a risk-free interest rate of 0% and a remaining contractual
life of between 1.0 and 5.0 years.

The following table summarizes the activity of stock options for the year ended
December 31, 2010.

Weighted
Number of Average
Shares Exercise
Outstanding Price
----------- -----
Balance, December 31, 2009 -- $ --
Options granted 680,900 0.46
Options exercised -- --
Options forfeited or expired -- --
-------- ------

Balance, December 31, 2010 680,900 $ 0.46
======== ======

The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year ended
December 31, 2010 was $0.09 per option and there were no options exercised
during the same period. The value recorded for the outstanding exercisable
options at December 31, 2010 was $51,574.

7. Commitments and Contingencies:

In February 2010, we entered into an eighteen month services agreement with a
construction data company regarding Smart BIM; the construction and maintenance
of databases relating to customers, sales leads and marketing strategies. As a
result of the agreement, commencing April 1, 2010, we will pay $1,140 per month
for a period of eighteen months.

The Company, as of December 31, 2010 has no additional financial commitments
that would represent long term commitments on behalf of the Company.

F-35

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

7. Commitments and Contingencies: (continued)

Capital Leases - The Company has not entered into any kind of capital leases for
furnishings, equipment or for any other purposes.

Prepaid Inventory - Our agreements with several of our inventory component
suppliers generally provide that between 50% and 60% of the purchase order price
is due upon the placement of an order, with the remaining balance due upon
completion and shipment of the order, normally within 30 days. Purchase order
prepaid deposits are included in the balance sheet as Prepaid expenses and other
current assets. As of December 31, 2010, purchase order prepaid deposits totaled
approximately $43,000 with three of our major suppliers.

8. Related Party Transactions:

During fiscal 2009, the Company acquired assets through the Adams Agreement
described in Note 1, above. Mr. Adams is considered a related party, since he
was the largest secured creditor of Ciralight Inc., the company from which he
acquired certain assets in foreclosure and subsequently sold the assets to the
Company, and he is the largest shareholder in the Company. These assets were
valued at their predecessor values. As described in Note 4 above, the Company
borrowed money from Terry Adams, the son of Mr. George Adams, Sr., in exchange
for a Convertible Promissory Note.

As described in Note 4, above, on March 31, 2010, the Company holds a note
receivable from the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
Randall Letcavage.

As described in Note 7, above, the Company leases warehouse space from one of
our directors, Frederick Feck and a portion of our CEO, Jeffrey Brain's,
residence is utilized as an office. The Company has recorded contributed capital
of $6,000 relating to the value of the use of the residence for the benefit of
the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010.

In January 2010, the Company entered into a non-exclusive distributorship
agreement with Globalight Energy Solutions LLC, which is partly owned by Smokey
Robinson, the legendary entertainer, Randall Letcavage, our Chief Executive
Officer, Jeffrey Brain, our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer,
and some other persons not associated with the Company. Smokey Robinson is the
single largest shareholder in the distribution company and has agreed to assist
the Company in promotions and media relations to promote the company products.
Randall Letcavage and Jeff Brain have had a business relationship with Smokey
Robinson and secured his participation in the distribution company to help
promote products. The value of having an icon celebrity involved is countless
dollars in potential free media and promotions and, therefore, it was deemed a
valuable arrangement for the Company. The distribution company will be a
minority certified company that can assist in securing certain contracts. The
distribution company will be non-exclusive and operate under the same terms,
conditions and pricing as the other distribution companies and, therefore, will
not receive any beneficial or special treatment over our other dealers or
distributors.

F-36

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

8. Related Party Transactions: (continued)

The terms and conditions of the dealer agreement with Chaparral Green Energy
Solutions, LLC and the distributorship agreement with Globalight Energy
Solutions, LLC are the same as for the other dealer and distributorship
agreements. Therefore, these two agreements do not contain preferential or more
favorable terms or conditions than agreements with our other dealers or
distributors, except for the fact that the Company did not require Globalight
Energy Solutions, LLC to pay the standard distributorship fee of $15,000. In
lieu of Globalight Energy Solutions, LLC paying the standard distributorship fee
of $15,000, Smokey Robinson agreed to use his name, contacts and likeness to
promote the Company products. Our board of directors believes that the value to
the Company of Mr. Robinson's promotion of our products is greater than the
$15,000 distributorship fee to the Company.

On December 30,2010, Terry Adams advanced the Company $200,000 for short term
working capital purposes, as represented by the advances payable-related party
amount of $200,000 at December 31, 2010. The Company repaid the $200,000 advance
to Terry Adams on January 5, 2011.

9. Share Based Compensation:

In January 2010, 352,941 common stock shares at $.25 per share, with an
aggregate value of $88,235, were issued as compensation and for services
rendered in order to satisfy the anti-dilution rights. The Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company were each due $30,000 in
aggregate compensation resulting from $3,000 per month accrued for each of them
from March through December 2009. In addition, the Chief Financial Officer was
due additional compensation of $29,876 for the period from February 26, 2009
(inception) to December 31, 2009. Our board of directors granted anti-dilution
rights to Jeffrey Brain, iCapital Finance, Inc. (a company owned by Randall
Letcavage, our former Chief Executive Officer, and his business partner,
Rosemary Nguyen), Randall Letcavage and David E. Wise, our securities counsel.
These anti-dilution rights entitled Jeffrey Brain, iCapital Finance, Inc.,
Randall Letcavage and David E. Wise to acquire additional shares of our common
stock at $.25 per share in order to maintain their original percentage ownership
in the our common stock. The rights entitled the holders to acquire additional
shares as a result of the private offering conducted by the Company. The
anti-dilution rights agreement entitled the holders to acquire their additional
shares prior to March 31, 2010, at the same share price of $.25 that subscribers
were purchasing stock for in the private offering. The holders, other than
iCapital Finance, exercised their rights during December 2009.

10. Income Taxes:

Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets
are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax
credit carryforwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable
temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax
assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management,
it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets
will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the
effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

F-37

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

10. Income Taxes: (continued)

Net deferred tax liabilities consist of the following components as of December
31, 2010 and 2009:

2010 2009
-------- --------
Deferred tax assets
NOL Carryover $610,012 $246,468
Accrued expenses-related party 6,088 444

Deferred tax liabilities
Due to related parties -- --

Valuation allowance (616,100) (246,912)
-------- --------

Net deferred tax asset $ -- $ --
======== ========

The income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by
applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to pretax income from continuing
operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 and for the period from February
26, 2009 (inception) to December 31, 2009 due to the following:

2010 2009
---------- ----------
Book Income $ (403,422) $ (316,008)
Accrued expenses-related party 5,643 444
Stock and options for services and
contributed rent 103,283 69,465
Meals & Entertainment 796 1,985
Unrealized Loss -- --
Valuation allowance 293,700 244,114
---------- ----------

$ -- $ --
========== ==========

At December 31, 2010, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $1,564,100 that may be offset against future taxable income from
the year 2011 through 2030. No tax benefit has been reported in the March 31,
2010 or December 31, 2009 consolidated financial statements, since the potential
tax benefit is offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.

Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net
operating loss carryforwards for Federal income tax reporting purposes are
subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur, net operating
loss carryforwards may be limited as to use in future years.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") has issued Financial
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 ("FIN 48"). FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's
financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. FIN 48 requires a company to determine whether it is more likely
than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based upon the
technical merits of the position. If the more-like1y-than-not threshold is met,
a company must measure the tax position to determine the amount to recognize in
the financial statements. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the
Company performed a review of its material tax positions in accordance with
recognition and measurement standards established by FIN 48. At the adoption
date of April 1, 2009, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefit which would
affect the effective tax rate if recognized.

F-38

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

11. Legal Matters:

On October 15, 2009, we filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of
California for the County of Orange, Central Justice Center (Case No. 30-2009,
00314998) ("Complaint") against Jacque Stevens, Rex Miller, Greg Schmalz, A-1
Daylighting, Consultech, Daylight Specialist and DOES 1-25. The Complaint
includes five causes of action by us against the defendants: Tortious
Interference with Contract, Commercial Disparagement, Conspiracy, Breach of
Contract, Unfair Business Practices and Libel. The Complaint alleges that we
entered into a nondisclosure agreement as part of an agreement to work toward
completing a joint venture/private label of our solar lighting systems with
Firestone Building Products and that defendants attempted to interfere with our
business relationship with Firestone Building Products by disparaging our
products (misrepresentations regarding prior sales, installations and quality of
service and that we provided or substituted defective or improper parts in our
products). We are seeking general, special and punitive or exemplary damages and
injunctive relief against the defendants.

12. Change in Officers and Directors:

On March 18, 2010, Randall Letcavage resigned as Chief Executive Officer,
President and a director of the Company in order to continue and concentrate on
his other businesses. Going forward, Mr. Letcavage will be available to assist
and contribute to the Company in a less demanding role.

On March 19, 2010, a majority of Company directors resolved to accept Randall
Letcavage's resignation as of March 18, 2010, appointed Jeffrey Brain to serve
as the Company's Chief Executive Officer and President in addition to his
existing positions of Chief Operating officer and Chief Financial Officer and
appointed Terry Adams a member of the Board of Directors of the Company at such
time as the Company obtains Director and Officer liability insurance. As of
March 23, 2009, Terry Adams is not a Director, since the insurance coverage has
not been obtained

F-39

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and for the
period from February 26, 2009 (inception) to
December 31, 2010

13. Major Customers

Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2010 and for the period from February
26, 2009 (inception) to December 31, 2009, include sales to the following major
customers, together with the receivables due from those customers:

Sales:
For the Period from
February 26, 2009
Year Ended (inception) to
December 31, December 31,
Customer 2010 2009
-------- ------- -------
Customer A* 143,018 --
Customer B 106,085 313,402

Accounts Receivable as of
December 31,
Customer 2010 2009
-------- ------- -------
Customer A* 1,253 --
Customer B 39,911 127,562

----------
* Customer A was not determined to be a major customer for the period from
February 26, 2009 (inception) to December 31, 2009.

14. Subsequent Events:

On January 5, 2011, the Company made a payment of $200,000 to Terry Adams as
repayment of the $200,000 Mr. Adams advanced the Company on December 30,2010 for
working capital purposes.

In January 2011, 6,000 common stock shares at $0.50 per share, with an aggregate
value of $3,000, were issued for cash, resulting from sales of our stock through
a Private Placement Offering.

On February 14, 2011, Mr. George Adams, Sr. advanced the company $50,000 for
short term working capital purposes.

During March 2011, the Company issued 25,000 common stock shares at $0.50 per
share to Craig Arrojo pursuant to an agreement for engineering services entered
into by the Company. The services were valued at $12,500.

During March 2011, the Company issued 25,000 shares of common stock at $.50 per
share to William Robinson Jr., a/k/a Smokey Robinson, pursuant to an agreement
for product promotional services entered into by the Company. The services were
valued at $12,500.

During the first quarter of 2011, the Company recorded the satisfaction for the
full amount of principal and accrued interest due on the note receivable from
the Company's former President and Chief Executive Officer, Randall Letcavage.
The balance of the note, including accrued interest, was $75,454 at December 31,
2010.

During the first quarter of 2011, the Company has continued to enter into
numerous Dealer Agreements with authorized dealers regarding the sale,
installation and servicing of our products.

F-40

AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CIRALIGHT, INC. FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of
Ciralight Global, Inc.
Irvine, California

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Ciralight, Inc. as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for each of the two years then ended.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Ciralight, Inc. as of December
31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each
of the two years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.

We were not engaged to examine management's assessment of the effectiveness of
Ciralight, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2008 and 2007 and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion thereon.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the
financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses, has negative
working capital, and subsequent to year end all assets were foreclosed on, which
raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern. Management's plans in regard to those matters are also described in
Note 2 to the financial statements. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP
---------------------------------------------
HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP
Salt Lake City, Utah
February 10, 2010

F-41

CIRALIGHT, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS

December 31,
-----------------------------------
2008 2007
------------ ------------

ASSETS

Current assets
Cash & cash equivalents $ 14,163 $ 69,544
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $52,083 and 0, respectively 108,439 28,419
Inventory 341,595 140,336
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 123,325 57,755
------------ ------------
Total current assets 587,522 296,054

Property and equipment, net 137,379 249,785

Intangible assets, net 34,710 52,908
------------ ------------

Total assets $ 759,611 $ 598,747
============ ============

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Current liabilities
Accounts payable $ 1,200,874 $ 347,598
Accrued expenses 370,958 814,136
Notes payable, related party 1,500,000 29,211
Convertible notes, net of debt discount of $196,560 and $592,532, respectively 444,537 1,442,223
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 3,516,369 2,633,168
------------ ------------
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)

Stockholders' deficit
Redeemable preferred stock - $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized,
0 and 425,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively -- 4,251
Common stock - no par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized,
25,061,137 and 23,953,673 shares issued and outstanding, respectively 8,984,328 5,701,843
Additional paid-in capital -- 208,299
Accumulated deficit (11,741,086) (7,948,814)
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' deficit (2,756,758) (2,034,421)
------------ ------------

Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit $ 759,611 $ 598,747
============ ============

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-42

CIRALIGHT, INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2008 2007
----------- -----------

Sales $ 1,592,263 $ 666,626

Cost of goods sold 1,403,599 580,848
----------- -----------

Gross profit 188,664 85,778
----------- -----------

Operating expenses
Research and development expenses 5,521 58,544
Selling and marketing expenses 171,051 324,603
General and administrative expenses 2,875,004 4,364,681
----------- -----------
Total operating expenses 3,051,576 4,747,828
----------- -----------

Loss from operations (2,862,912) (4,662,050)
----------- -----------

Other income (expense)
Interest income (expense), net (931,342) (835,946)
Other income (expense), net 1,982 1,454
----------- -----------
Total other expenses (929,360) (834,492)
----------- -----------

Net loss $(3,792,272) $(5,496,542)
=========== ===========

Basic and diluted loss per share $ (0.15) $ (0.23)
=========== ===========

Weighted average shares used in per share calculation 24,577,743 23,597,143
=========== ===========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-43

CIRALIGHT, INC
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY (DEFICIT)
For the period from December 31, 2006 to December 31, 2008

No Par Common Stock Preferred Stock Additional Total
-------------------- --------------- Paid in Accumulated Equity /
Shares Value Shares Par Capital Deficit Deficit
------ ----- ------ --- ------- ------- -------

BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2006 23,015,401 $3,263,052 -- $ -- $ -- $ (2,452,272) $ 810,779

Common Stock Issued For Cash 938,272 790,531 -- -- -- -- 790,531

Preferred Stock For Cash -- -- 4,251 4,251 208,299 -- 212,550

Options Issued For Services -- 351,714 -- -- -- -- 351,714

SAR's Issued For Services -- 2,831 -- -- -- -- 2,831

Convertible Note Discount
& Warrants -- 1,292,860 -- -- -- -- 1,292,860

Warrants -- 855 -- -- -- -- 855

Net Loss -- -- -- -- -- (5,496,542) (5,496,541)
---------- ---------- ------- ------- --------- ------------ -----------
BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2007 23,953,673 5,701,843 4,251 4,251 208,299 (7,948,814) (2,034,421)

Common Stock Issued For Cash
& Preferred Stock Conversion 1,107,464 448,732 -- -- -- -- 448,732

Preferred Stock Converted
Into Common Stock -- 212,550 (4,251) (4,251) (208,299) -- --

Options Issued For Services -- 337,767 -- -- -- -- 337,767

Vesting SAR's -- 4,354 -- -- -- -- 4,354

Notes Payable & Interest
Converted into Common Stock -- 1,883,109 -- -- -- -- 1,883,109

Amortization of Debt
Discount & Warrants -- 395,973 -- -- -- -- 395,973

Net Loss -- -- -- -- -- (3,792,272) (3,792,272)
---------- ---------- ------- ------- --------- ------------ -----------

BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2008 25,061,137 $8,984,328 -- $ -- $ -- $(11,741,086) $(2,756,758)
========== ========== ======= ======= ========= ============ ===========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-44

CIRALIGHT, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the years ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2008 2007
----------- -----------

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net Loss $(3,792,272) $(5,496,542)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 145,287 137,869
Amortization of discount on convertible note 800,669 700,328
Warrants granted -- 855
Options issued 337,767 351,714
Stock Appreciation Rights issuance 4,354 2,831
Issuance of common stock for services 26,558 --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
(Increase) decrease in inventory (201,259) 49,471
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable (80,020) 5,256
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other current assets 14,104 (39,713)
Increase in accounts payable 853,276 219,275
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses (399,754) 721,891
----------- -----------

Net cash used in operating activities (2,291,290) (3,346,765)
----------- -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of equipment (14,683) (65,778)
Acquisition of intangibles -- (33,253)
----------- -----------

Net cash used in investing activities (14,683) (99,031)
----------- -----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from notes payable 2,583,367 2,136,301
Repayments of notes payable (675,275) (97,500)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 342,500 790,531
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock -- 212,550
----------- -----------

Net cash provided by financing activities 2,250,592 3,041,882
----------- -----------

Net decrease in cash (55,381) (403,914)

Cash, beginning of period 69,544 473,458
----------- -----------

Cash, end of period $ 14,163 $ 69,544
=========== ===========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-45

CIRALIGHT, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

1. Background and Basis of Presentation:

Ciralight, Inc. (the "Company") was incorporated in the State of Delaware on
September 15, 2005. The Company is in the business of designing, developing,
and distributing proprietary advanced daylighting systems for traditional
non-residential markets that benefit from natural lighting.

Certain reclassifications have been made in the financial statements for
2008 and 2007 to conform to our financial statement presentation for 2009,
specifically the depreciation and amortization expense for assets associated
with cost of sales has been reclassified from general and administrative
expenses to cost of sales.

2. Going Concern:

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on the basis of
accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the
realization of assets and extinguishment of liabilities in the normal course
of business.

The Company had a net loss of $3,792,272 in fiscal 2008 and a net loss of
$5,496,542 in fiscal 2007. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, working capital
deficits were $2,928,847 and $2,337,114, respectively and the accumulated
deficits were $2,756,758 and $2,034,421, respectively. The company covered
the deficits primarily from issuing short term convertable notes and selling
stock of the Company. Additional funding will be required to continue to
market its product and finance continuing research and development,
production and general and administrative activities and ultimately achieve
profitable operations. The Company ceased operations in March of 2009 and is
now defunct, as a result of a secured creditor foreclosing on the Company's
assets. See Subsequent Events Note 13, below.

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - The Company considers all highly liquid debt
instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.

The Company maintains its cash accounts primarily with banks located in
Utah. The total cash balances are insured by the FDIC up to $250,000 per
bank. At times, the amount of the Company's cash and cash equivalent exceeds
the balance insured by the FDIC.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - The Company's accounts receivable are unsecured and
the Company is at risk to the extent such amounts become uncollectible.
Management continually monitors accounts receivable balances and provides
for an allowance for doubtful accounts at the time collection becomes
questionable based on payment history or age of the receivable. The Company
sells products and services generally on net 30 day terms. The Company does
not normally charge financing fees on late payments. Accounts receivable are
charged to the allowance for bad debts when the Company has exhausted all
reasonable means of collection.

INVENTORY - Inventory consists of raw materials and is stated at lower of
cost or market on a first-in first-out method. Management will establish a
reserve for damaged and discontinued inventory when determined necessary. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, no reserve was required.

F-46

CIRALIGHT, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (continued)

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT - Property and equipment are stated at cost.
Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the assets using
the straight-line method generally over a 3 to 5 year period. Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the straight-line method over the life of
the related lease. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are
charged to expense as incurred. Upon retirement or disposal of assets, the
cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the account and any
gain or loss is reflected in the statement of operations. Depreciation
expenses for property and equipment are recorded as either cost of goods
sold or general and administrative expenses, depending on the use of the
assets.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS - Intangible assets with definite useful lives are
amortized over such useful lives, which management determined to be three
years, and are subject to tests for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that impairment may exist. There was no impairment
recorded in the fiscal years of 2008 and 2007 and amortization of $18,198
and $17,528 was recorded as cost of goods sold in the respective years.
Amortization expense was related to the Company's patent rights and was
recorded as cost of goods sold.

IMPAIRMENT OF LONG LIVED ASSETS - The Company evaluates its long-lived
assets for impairment, in accordance with SFAS No. 144, when events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount may not
be recoverable. Impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated
future cash flow on an undiscounted basis is less than the carrying amount
of the related assets. An impairment loss is measured and recorded based on
the discounted estimated future cash flows. Changes in significant
assumptions underlying future cash flow estimates or fair values of assets
may have a material effect on the Company's financial position and results
of operations. No such impairment was indicated at December 31, 2008 or
2007.

REVENUE RECOGNITION - The Company recognizes revenue from product sales when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the
seller's price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and collectability is
reasonably assured.

ADVERTISING COSTS - Costs associated with advertising are expensed as
incurred. Advertising expense was $171,051 for the year ended December 31,
2008 and $324,603 for the year ended December 31, 2007.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS - Research and development costs are charged
to operations in the period incurred. The amounts expensed for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were $5,521 and $58,544, respectively.

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK - Credit risk represents the accounting loss
that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed
completely to perform as contracted. Concentrations of credit risk (whether
on or off balance sheet) that arise from financial instruments exist for
groups of customers or counterparties when they have similar economic
characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual
obligations to be similarly effected by changes in economic or other
conditions.

F-47

CIRALIGHT, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (continued)

Financial instruments potentially subjecting the Company to concentrations
of credit risk consist principally of accounts receivable. As of December
31, 2008, the accounts receivable total was $160,522 with a allowance for
doubtful accounts of $52,083 and as of December 31, 2007, four customers had
balances representing 10% or more of the Company's accounts receivable

USE OF ESTIMATES - The preparation of the financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the balance sheet and the reported
amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant
estimates include the Company's debt discount, and share-based compensation
expense. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION - On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the
provisions of FAS No. 123R "Share-Based Payment" ("FAS 123R") which requires
recognition of stock-based compensation expense for all share-based payments
based on fair value. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company measured
compensation expense for all of its share-based compensation using the
intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board ("APB")
Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25") and
related interpretations. The Company has provided pro forma disclosure
amounts in accordance with FAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation - Transition and Disclosure - an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 123" ("FAS 148"), as if the fair value method defined by FAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock Based Compensation" ("FAS 123") had been applied to
its stock-based compensation.

The Company measures compensation expense for its non-employee stock-based
compensation under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 96-18, "Accounting for Equity Instruments
that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction
with Selling, Goods or Services". The fair value of the option issued is
used to measure the transaction, as this is more reliable than the fair
value of the services received. The fair value is measured at the value of
the Company's common stock on the date that the commitment for performance
by the counterparty has been reached or the counterparty's performance is
complete. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to
compensation expense and additional paid-in capital.

INCOME TAXES - The Company accounts for its income taxes under the
provisions of SFAS No. 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes." This statement
requires the use of the asset and liability method of accounting for
deferred income taxes. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of
temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax
reporting purposes, at the applicable enacted tax rates. The Company
provides a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets when the
future realizability of the assets is no longer considered to be more likely
than not.

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Interpretation No. 48 ("FIN
48"), "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes -- an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109." The application of income tax law is inherently
complex. As such, the Company is required to make certain assumptions and
judgments regarding its income tax positions and the likelihood whether such
tax positions would be sustained if challenged. Interest and penalties

F-48

CIRALIGHT, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (continued)

related to uncertain tax provisions are recorded as a component of the
provision for income taxes. Interpretations and guidance surrounding income
tax laws and regulations change over time. As such, changes in the Company's
assumptions and judgments can materially affect amounts recognized in the
Company's consolidated balance sheets and statement of operations.

4. Inventory:

Inventory consisted of the following at December 31,

2008 2007
-------- --------
Inventory:
Inventory raw materials $341,595 $140,336
-------- --------
$341,595 $140,336
======== ========

5. Property and Equipment:

Property and Equipment consisted of the following at December 31,

2008 2007
-------- --------

Property and Equipment $ 417,671 $ 402,988
Accumulated depreciation (280,292) (153,203)
--------- ---------
Net property and equipment $ 137,379 $ 249,785
========= =========

Depreciation expense for property and equipment totaled $127,089 and
$120,341, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. The
use of the above property and equipment determines if the depreciation is
recorded as cost of goods sold or as general and administrative expenses.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, $43,210 of depreciation expense was
recorded as cost of goods sold and $83,879 was recorded as general and
administrative expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2007, $40,916 of
depreciation expense was recorded as cost of goods sold and $79,425 was
recorded as general and administrative expenses.

6. Notes Payable:

Notes Payable activity for the year ended December 31, 2007:

CONVERTIBLE NOTES - From March 2007 to April 2007, the Company received
aggregate proceeds of $1,000,000 in exchange for convertible notes issued to
five investors. Under the terms of the convertible notes, the notes accrue
simple interest at an annual rate of 12%, with principal and interest due in
one year from the date of the notes. The notes are secured by the assets of
the Company. The note holders will also receive warrants to purchase 29,026
shares per $50,000 note that were issued with an exercise price equal to the
80% of the price per share of common stock issued by the Company with an
expiration date of five years from the date of the notes. The notes are
automatically convertible in the event that the Company subscribes $3
million of additional debt and equity (separate and apart from debt and
equity raised under the convertible note subscription agreement) with the
conversion price equal to 80% of the price per share of common stock issued
by the Company in the transaction. The Company accounted for the beneficial
conversion feature under EITF 00-27, APPLICATION OF ISSUE NO. 98-5,
ACCOUNTING/OR CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES WITH BENEFICIAL CONVERSION FEATURES, TO
CERTAIN CONVERTIBLE INSTRUMENTS. After consideration of the allocation of
the proceeds to the convertible notes ($768,833) and warrants ($231,167) in

F-49

CIRALIGHT, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

6. Notes Payable: (continued)

accordance with APB 14, the Company calculated that the convertible notes
have an effective conversion price of $0.52 per share. This resulted in a
beneficial conversion of $0.33 per share or $481,167. The beneficial
conversion feature and allocation of proceeds to the warrants was recorded
as a debt discount and an increase in additional paid-in capital. The debt
discount is amortized over the term of the convertible notes and accordingly
the Company recognized $543,155 within interest expense related to this
amortization during the twelve months ended December 31, 2007.

From July 2007 to November 2007, the Company received aggregate proceeds of
$875,000 in exchange for convertible notes issued to twelve investors. Under
the terms of the convertible notes, the notes accrue simple interest at an
annual rate of 12%, with principal and interest due in one year from the
date of the note. The notes are secured by the assets of the Company. The
note holders will also receive warrants to purchase 29,026 shares per
$50,000 note that were issued with an exercise price equal to the 80% of the
price per share of common stock issued by the Company with an expiration
date of five years from the date of the notes. The notes are automatically
convertible in the event that the Company subscribes $4 million of
additional debt and equity the "transaction") (separate and apart from debt
and equity raised under the convertible note subscription agreement) with
the conversion price equal to 80% of the price per share of common stock
issued by the Company in the transaction. The Company accounted for the
beneficial conversion feature under EITF 00-27, APPLICATION OF ISSUE NO.
98-5, ACCOUNTING/OR CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES WITH BENEFICIAL CONVERSION
FEATURES, TO CERTAIN CONVERTIBLE INSTRUMENTS. After consideration of the
allocation of the proceeds to the convertible notes ($745,502) and warrants
($128,498) in accordance with APB 14, the Company calculated that the
convertible notes have an effective conversion price of $0.34 per share.
This resulted in a beneficial conversion of $0.16 per share or $347,248. The
beneficial conversion feature and allocation of proceeds to the warrants was
recorded as a debt discount and an increase in additional paid-in capital.
The debt discount is amortized over the term of the convertible notes and
accordingly the Company recognized $126,865 within interest expense related
to this amortization during the twelve months ended December 31, 2007.

PROMISSORY NOTE - RELATED PARTY - On December 19, 2007, the Company issued a
$125,000 promissory note payable to management (see Note 12). Under the
terms of this agreement, the note accrues simple interest at an annual rate
of 15%. The outstanding principal balance, plus all accrued and unpaid
interest shall be due and payable upon maturity of March 1, 2008. Total
interest expense related to this note in fiscal 2007 was $565. The Company
also issued 3,125 warrants and the relative fair value of the warrants of
$850, which was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was
recorded as common stock and recorded as an expense.

NOTE PAYABLE - RELATED PARTY - Throughout the 2007 fiscal year, the Company
received $76,711 from management (see Note 12). The Company repaid $47,500
during the year. The outstanding balance due to related parties at December
31, 2007 was $29,211, which was recorded as a short-term liability. Total
interest expense related to this note was $0 in fiscal 2007.

F-50

CIRALIGHT, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

6. Notes Payable: (continued)

All of the above notes payable, totaling $2,029,211 (before debt discount)
were due in fiscal 2008. The above notes payable, excluding the note payable
- related party, have warrants that entitle the holders to purchase up to
1,088,475 of the Company's common stock at a price of $0.40 per share. The
weighted average fair-value of warrants granted during fiscal 2007 was
$0.30. All warrants were outstanding at December 31, 2007 and have terms
ending on various dates through 2012.

Notes Payable activity for the year ended December 31, 2008:

CONVERTIBLE NOTES - At December 31, 2007, the principal balance of the
convertible notes payable was $1,875,000, held by fifteen investors.

From January 2008 to March 2008, the Company received aggregate proceeds of
$225,000 in exchange for convertible notes issued to four investors, two
current convertible note holders and two additional investors. Under the
terms of the convertible notes, the notes accrue simple interest at an
annual rate of 12%, with principal and interest due in one year from the
date of the notes. The notes are secured by the assets of the Company. The
note holders will also receive warrants to purchase 29,026 shares per
$50,000 note that were issued with an exercise price equal to the 80% of the
price per share of common stock issued by the Company with an expiration
date of five years from the date of the notes. The notes are automatically
convertible in the event that the Company subscribes $3 million of
additional debt and equity (separate and apart from debt and equity raised
under the convertible note subscription agreement) with the conversion price
equal to 80% of the price per share of common stock issued by the Company in
the transaction. The Company accounted for the beneficial conversion feature
under EITF 00-27, APPLICATION OF ISSUE NO. 98-5, ACCOUNTING/OR CONVERTIBLE
SECURITIES WITH BENEFICIAL CONVERSION FEATURES, TO CERTAIN CONVERTIBLE
Instruments. After consideration of the allocation of the proceeds to the
convertible notes ($191,627) and warrants ($33,373) in accordance with APB
14, the Company calculated that the convertible notes have an effective
conversion price of $0.34 per share. This resulted in a beneficial
conversion of $0.16 per share or $89,623. The beneficial conversion feature
and allocation of proceeds to the warrants was recorded as a debt discount
and an increase in additional paid-in capital. The debt discount is
amortized over the term of the convertible notes and accordingly the Company
recognized $25,760 within interest expense related to this amortization
during the twelve months ended December 31, 2008.

At March 31, 2008, the principal balance of the convertible notes payable
was $2,100,000. During the second fiscal quarter of 2008, $1,300,000 of the
convertible notes payable balance was satisfied and $200,000 of the balance
was paid in cash, upon the request of one investor.

At June 30, 2008, the principal balance of the convertible notes payable was
$600,000. During the third fiscal quarter of 2008, $500,000 of the
convertible notes payable balance was converted into shares of common stock
upon the election by two of the investors and $86,698 of the balance was
paid in cash, upon the request of two investors, which consisted of a
portion of the two investors' balances.

F-51

CIRALIGHT, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

6. Notes Payable: (continued)

The principal balance of the convertible notes payable of $13,302 at
September 30, 2008, was disbursed to the remaining two investors during the
fourth fiscal quarter of 2008.

PROMISSORY NOTE - RELATED PARTY - On January 1, 2008, the balance in the
promissory note payable to management account was $125,000. During 2008, the
Company issued promissory notes payable to management for a total of
$793,303 (see Note 12). Under the terms of the promissory notes, the notes
accrue simple interest at an annual rate of 15%. The outstanding principal
balance, plus all accrued and unpaid interest shall be due and payable upon
maturity on March 1, 2008. During 2008, payments made to pay down the
promissory notes totaled $288,303, leaving a balance at December 31, 2008 of
$630,000. At December 31, 2008, accrued interest relating to the promissory
notes totaled $225,897.

NOTE PAYABLE - RELATED PARTY - Throughout the 2008 fiscal year, the Company
received $65,062 from management (see Note 12). The Company repaid $94,275
during the year, leaving a zero balance in the Note Payable to Related Party
account at December 31, 2008.

NOTE PAYABLE - RELATED PARTY /SECURED CREDITOR -- During 2008, George Adams,
Sr., became a secured creditor and related party of the Company (see Note
12). During 2008, Mr. Adams loaned an aggregate total of $1,500,000 to the
Company, at an annual interest rate of 7%, to be paid upon maturity at March
1, 2009. Upon default by the Company, Mr. Adams would have the right to
foreclose on the Company's assets and become the sole owner. See Subsequent
Events Note 13, below.

Below is a summary of Notes Payable activity, including debt discount, for
fiscal 2008:

Balance at Net Increase Balance at
December 31, (Decrease) for December 31,
Description 2007 fiscal year 2008 2008
----------- ----------- ---------------- -----------

Notes Payable $ 2,000,000 $(1,625,000) $ 375,000
Notes Payable - Related Party 29,211 1,725,789 1,755,000
----------- ----------- -----------
Total $ 2,029,211 $ 100,789 $ 2,130,000
=========== =========== ===========

7. Income Taxes:

Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax
assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating
loss and tax credit carryforwards and deferred tax liabilities are
recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the
differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their
tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in
the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on
the date of enactment.

Net deferred tax liabilities consist of the following components as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007:

F-52

CIRALIGHT, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

7. Income Taxes: (continued)

2008 2007
----------- -----------
Deferred tax assets:
NOL Carryover $ 3,140,752 $ 2,529,486
Accrued Expenses 585,000
Section 263(A) Capitalization -- 145,768
Allowance for Doubtful A/R 20,312

Deferred tax liabilities
Depreciation -- --

Valuation allowance (3,746,064) (2,675,254)
----------- -----------
Net deferred tax asset $ -- $ --
=========== ===========

The income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by
applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to pretax income from continuing
operations for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 due to the
following:

2008 2007
----------- -----------

Book Income $(1,478,986) $(2,143,651)
Options 139,232 138,273
Meals & Entertainment 41,036 52,813
Interest Expense 239,260 273,128
Accrued Expenses 593,959 --
Section 263(A) Capitalization (145,678) 98,009
Valuation allowance 611,177 1,581,428
----------- -----------
$ -- $ --
=========== ===========

At December 31, 2008, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $8,000,000 that may be offset against future taxable income
from the year 2008 through 2028. No tax benefit has been reported in the
December 31, 2008 consolidated financial statements since the potential tax
benefit is offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.

Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net
operating loss carryforwards for Federal income tax reporting purposes are
subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur, net
operating loss carryforwards may be limited as to use in future years.

8. Stockholders' Equity:

The Company is authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock
and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock with no par value and $0.01 par
value, respectively, under terms and conditions established by the Board of
Directors.

Prior to fiscal year 2007, the Company has issued a total of 23,953,673
shares of common stock. A total of 15,000,000 of these shares were issued to
the Company's founders pursuant to director consent resolutions entered into
upon the formation of the Company. The remaining 8,953,673 shares of common
stock were issued to investors through private placements at offering prices
varying from $0.20 to $0.75 per share.

F-53

CIRALIGHT, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

8. Stockholders' Equity: (continued)

During fiscal year 2007, the Company has issued 938,272 shares of common
stock to investors through private placements at offering prices varying
from $0.50 to $0.85. Net proceeds on these shares issued totaled $790,531.

During September 2007, the Company issued 425,000 of cumulative 12% Series A
Preferred Stock with a $0.01 par value and $0.50 face value. Proceeds on
this issuance totaled $212,550. The preferred stock was initially
convertible into 425,100 shares of the Company's common stock at a
conversion price of $0.50 per share.

The holders of the Series A Preferred may require the Company to redeem its
shares at any time after December 31, 2012 at face value plus dividends in
arrears. In addition, the Company may call for redemption of these shares
after December 31, 2012.

During 2008, the Company issued 1,107,464 common shares, with total value of
$ 448,732. Thus, at December 31, 2008, the cumulative number of common
shares issued totaled 25,061,137.

During 2008, all holders of the Series A Preferred stock redeemed their
shares and converted them into common stock. A total of 425,000 Series A
Preferred shares were converted into 425,000 shares of common stock at the
same value of $212,550.

9. Stock Options and Warrants:

STOCK OPTION PLAN -- The Company has adopted a 2007 Stock Option Plan. The
maximum number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to
exercise of options are 5 million and the Board of Directors, or a
designated committee, is to determine the exercise price of options. The
options either vest immediately or at scheduled periods over approximately 3
or 4 years and have a life of 5 or 10 years.

Share-based compensation expense resulted in $337,767 and $351,714,
respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was used to estimate the option fair
values. This option-pricing model requires a number of assumptions, of which
the most significant are, expected stock price volatility, the expected
pre-vesting forfeiture rate and the expected option term (the amount of time
from the grant date until the options are exercised or expire). Expected
volatility was estimated utilizing a weighted average of comparable
published volatilities based on industry comparables. Expected pre-vesting
forfeitures were estimated based on actual historical and expected employee
turnover. The expected option term was calculated using the "simplified"
method permitted by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 107. The fair value of
options granted during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were
estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
with the following assumptions:

2008 & 2007
-----------

Expected volatility 58 - 62%
Risk-free interest rate 3.7 - 4.9%
Expected dividends --
Expected terms (in years) 5-8
Estimated forfeiture rate 30%

F-54

CIRALIGHT, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

9. Stock Options and Warrants: (continued)

The following tables summarize stock options outstanding and activity as of
and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:

Weighted Remaining
Average Contractual
Exercise Term
Shares Price (in years)
------ ----- ----------
Outstanding at January 1, 2007
Granted 4,775,000 $0.73 8.7
Exercised -- $ -- --
Forfeited (2,400,000) $0.76 9.0
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 2,375,000 $0.70 8.3
Exercisable at December 31, 2007 450,000 $0.64 4.5

Outstanding at January 1, 2008 2,375,000 $ -- --
Granted 818,333 $0.48 9.13
Exercised -- $ -- --
Forfeited (375,000) $0.05 8.18
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 2,818,333 $0.96 8.72
Exercisable at December 31, 2008 1,598,332 $1.15 4.06

If not previously exercised, options expire as follows:

Weighted Average Range of
Number of Options Exercise Price Exercise Price
----------------- -------------- --------------

2011 200,000 .12 $.50 - .75
2012 450,000 .31 $.50 - .75
2013 518,333 .35 $.50 - .50
2017 1,550,000 .36 $.50 - .85
2018 100,000 -- $.50 - .50
Total 2,818,333

The weighted average fair value of options granted during fiscal 2008 and
2007 was $0.27 and $0.33, respectively. The exercise price of options
granted during fiscal years 2008 and 2007 equaled the estimated fair market
value of the stock at the time of grant, except the exercise price for
250,000 options granted in 2007. These options have an exercise price of
$0.75 when the estimated fair market value of the stock was $0.85. No
options were exercised during the fiscal years 2008 and 2007. Accordingly,
the Company did not realize any tax deductions related to the intrinsic
value of exercised options.

F-55

CIRALIGHT, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

9. Stock Options and Warrants: (continued)

Total unrecognized share-based compensation expense from unvested stock
options granted in the year ended December 31, 2007 was $487,577.

WARRANTS -- See Note 5 for description of warrants.

The following tables summarize stock warrants outstanding and activity as of
and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:

Weighted Remaining
Average Contractual
Number of Exercise Term
Warrants Price (in years)
-------- ----- ----------

Outstanding at January 1, 2007 -- $ -- --
Granted 1,088,475 $0.58 4.44
Exercised -- $ -- --
Forfeited -- $ -- --
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 2,375,000 $0.58 4.44
Exercisable at December 31, 2007 1,088,475 $0.58 4.44

Outstanding at January 1, 2008 1,088,475 $ -- -
Granted 130,617 $0.05 5.14
Exercised -- $ -- --
Forfeited -- $ -- --
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 1,219,092 $0.05 5.14
Exercisable at December 31, 2008 1,219,092 $0.05 5.14

The weighted average fair value of warrants granted during fiscal 2008 and
2007 was $0.05 and $0.49, respectively.

F-56

CIRALIGHT, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

10. Stock Appreciation Rights:

On March 30, 2007 the Board of Directors adopted a Stock Appreciation Rights
Plan (SARs) allowing for the issuance of up to 500,000 SARs to employees of
the Company. Each SAR entitles the holder of the grant, if exercised, to
participate in the appreciation of the common stock of the Company above the
strike price of the grant. Exercised grants may, at the sole discretion of
the Company, be settled in cash or shares of common stock.

At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had issued 0 and 90,000 SARs,
respectively, under the plan. The grants vest over a period of three years
and have a life of 10 years. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was used
to estimate the fair value of the grants. See Note 9, Stock Options, for the
critical assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model.

The following tables summarizes SARs outstanding and activity as of and for
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:

Weighted
Average Weighted Average
Exercise Remaining Term
SAR Price (In Years)
--- ----- ----------

Outstanding at January 1, 2007 -- $ -- --
Granted 90,000 $ .85 4.3 yrs
Exercised -- $ 0 --
Forfeited (40,000) $ .85 4.3 yrs
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 50,000 $ .85 4.3 yrs
Exercisable at December 31, 2007 -- $ -- --

Outstanding at January 1, 2008 50,000 -- --
Granted -- -- --
Exercised -- -- --
Forfeited -- -- --
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 50,000 $ .85 3.35 yrs
Exercisable at December 31, 2008 -- --

All outstanding SARs at December 31, 2008 and 2007 expire during 2012 if not
previously exercised. There were no SARS granted during fiscal 2008 and the
weighted average fair value of SARs granted during fiscal 2007 was $0.37.

F-57

CIRALIGHT, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

11. Commitments and Contingencies:

OPERATING LEASES -- The Company leases office space pursuant to a
non-cancelable operating lease agreement. Future minimum lease payments
pursuant to the lease as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:

Years Ended December 31,
------------------------

2008 $144,595
2009 56,043
2010 38,935
2011 39,690
2012 20,222
--------
$299,485
========

Rent expense totaled $185,417 and $134,721, respectively, for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

CAPITAL LEASES - During 2007, the Company entered into capital lease
agreements with vendors whereby the Company received assets with a fair
value of $26,323 in exchange for capital leases. Under the terms of the
capital leases, the Company makes monthly payments totaling $2,345 with
implied interest rates ranging from 17.2% to 21.6% through March 2010 and
the capital leases are depreciated in accordance with property and equipment
policy. The following sets forth future minimum lease payments under the
capital lease:

As of December 31,
-----------------------
Years Ended December 31, 2007 2008
------------------------ ------- -------

2008 $28,134 $ --
2009 11,247 11,247
2010 1,731 1,731
------- -------
41,112 12,978
------- -------
Less: imputed interest (6,356) (1,881)
------- -------
$34,756 $11,097
======= =======

12. Related Party Transactions:

During fiscal 2007, the Company borrowed money from management to repay
vendors. The total borrowed was $76,711 (see Note 6).

On December 19, 2007, the Company issued a $125,000 promissory note to a
related party (see Note 6).

F-58

CIRALIGHT, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

12. Related Party Transactions: (continued)

During the 2007 fiscal year, the Company paid an entity, which is owned by a
member of the Board of Directors, $115,002 for goods and services and at
year end owed $21,052. The Company also received payments totaling $45,845
from this related party and at year end the Company recorded $ 1,248 in
accounts receivable.

During fiscal 2008, the Company repaid the $76,711 borrowed from management
in 2007, the Company paid off the $125,000 promissory note issued to a
related party in 2007 and the Company collected the $1,248 due from the
entity as of December 31, 2007.

In addition, during fiscal 2008, George Adams, Sr., became a secured
creditor and related party of the Company (see Note 6). During 2008, Mr.
Adams loaned a total of $1,500,000 to the Company to be paid upon maturity
at March 1, 2009. Upon default by the Company, Mr. Adams would have the
right to foreclose on the Company's assets and become the sole owner. See
Subsequent Events Note 13, below.

13. Subsequent Events:

DISCONTINUATION OF CIRALIGHT INC.

In the first quarter of 2009, the Company defaulted on the loan from George
Adams Sr. and Mr. Adams initiated a foreclosure action against the Company.
Mr. Adam's loan was secured by the Company's assets including the product
patents, assets, accounts receivable and inventory. The Board of Directors
of Ciralight Inc. on January 27, 2009 assigned all manufacturing rights to
Mr. Adams and instructed that the Company's inventory be moved from the
Company warehouse in Salt Lake City Utah to Mr. Adams' facility in Anaheim
California. On March 15, 2009 the Ciralight Inc. offices in Salt Lake City
were closed and all the files, remaining inventory, as well as computers and
equipment were moved to Southern California.

The Company has evaluated events subsequent to the balance sheet date
(December 31, 2008) through February 10, 2010 and concluded that no
additional subsequent events have occurred that require recognition in the
Financial Statements or disclosure in the Notes to the Financial Statements.

F-59

We have not authorized any dealer, salesperson or other person to provide
any information or make any representations about Ciralight Global, Inc., except
the information or representations contained in this prospectus. You should not
rely on any additional information or representations if made.

This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of
an offer to buy any securities:

* except the common stock covered by this prospectus
* in any jurisdiction in which the distribution, offer or solicitation
is not authorized
* in any jurisdiction where the dealer or other salesperson is not
qualified to make the offer or solicitation;
* to any person who is not a United States resident or who is outside
the jurisdiction of the United States

The delivery of this prospectus or any accompanying sale does not imply
that:

* there have been no changes in the affairs of Ciralight Global, Inc.
after the date of this prospectus; or
* the information contained in this prospectus is correct after the date
of this prospectus.

During the 150 days following the date of this prospectus, all dealers
effecting transactions in the registered securities, whether or not
participating in this distribution, may be required to deliver a prospectus.
This is in addition to the obligation of dealers to deliver a prospectus when
acting as underwriters.

PROSPECTUS

966,049 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

CIRALIGHT GLOBAL, INC.

November __, 2011

PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

ITEM 13. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION.

We are bearing all expenses in connection with this registration statement
other than sales commissions. Estimated expenses payable by us in connection
with the registration and distribution of the common stock registered hereby are
as follows.

SEC Registration Fee $ 17.22
Printing Expenses $ 2,000.00
Legal Fees and Expenses $100,000.00
Accounting Fees and Expenses $100,000.00
Blue Sky Fees and Expenses $ 1,500.00
Transfer Agent Fees and Expenses $ 2,000.00
Miscellaneous Expenses $ 500.00
Mergent, Inc. $ 2,500.00
-----------
Total $209,517.22
===========

ITEM 14. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.

LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.

The Nevada Revised Statutes allow us to indemnify our officers, directors,
employees, and agents from any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit,
or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative, except
under certain circumstances. Indemnification may only occur if a determination
has been made that the officer, director, employee, or agent acted in good faith
and in a manner, which such person believed to be in the best interests of the
corporation. A determination may be made by the shareholders; by a majority of
the directors who were not parties to the action, suit, or proceeding confirmed
by opinion of independent legal counsel; or by opinion of independent legal
counsel in the event a quorum of directors who were not a party to such action,
suit, or proceeding does not exist.

II-1

ITEM 15. SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES.

RECENT ISSUANCES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

Since its incorporation on February 26, 2009, we have issued the following
securities without registration under the Securities Act of 1933:

In April 2009, we issued the following shares of our common stock at par
value to our founders for services rendered in the formation of the Company and
for developmental work on our business plan:

Name of Shareholder Number of Shares Issued Aggregate Consideration
------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------

Jeffrey Brain 320,000 $320
Frederick Feck 400,000 $400
iCapital Finance, Inc. 240,000 $240
Randall Letcavage 400,000 $400

SUB-TOTAL: 1,360,000 shares of common stock outstanding after this issuance.

In April 2009, we issued 240,000 shares of our common stock at par value
for an aggregate consideration of $330 to David E. Wise, our securities counsel,
as payment for legal services previously rendered. The fair value of the
services rendered slightly exceeded the amount of stock issued at par value.

SUB-TOTAL: 1,600,000 shares of common stock outstanding after this issuance.

In April 2009, we entered into an Exchange of Stock for Assets Agreement
with Mr. George Adams, Sr. ("Adams Agreement") to acquire certain assets
including, but not limited to, a U.S. patent and patent applications pending in
Canada, Europe, Mexico and the United States, artwork, trademarks, equipment,
furniture, databases, technical drawings, promotional materials, trade names and
inventory parts and marketing rights related to the Suntracker One(TM),
Suntracker Two(TM) previously owned and distributed by Ciralight, Inc., a Utah
corporation, such assets having been foreclosed on by Mr. Adams, who was the
secured creditor of Ciralight, Inc. We have no affiliation, contractual or
otherwise, with Ciralight, Inc. or any of its employees, officers or directors.

II-2

In April 2009, we acquired all of the above described assets from Mr.
Adams, except for the U.S. patent and the patent applications pending in Canada,
Europe, Mexico and the United States, in exchange for 3,200,000 shares of our
common stock and 1,000,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock. In December
2009, we acquired the U.S. patent and patent applications pending in Canada,
Europe, Mexico and the United States from Mr. Adams in exchange for the issuance
by us of an additional 400,000 shares of our common stock and a convertible
promissory note in the amount of $250,000. The note is convertible into shares
of our common stock at a conversion rate of one share per $.25 of outstanding
principal and interest. As a result of this transaction, Mr. Adams is our
largest shareholder.

SUB-TOTAL: 5,200,000 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred
stock outstanding after this issuance.

On October 1, 2009, we issued a Convertible Note to Mr. Frederick Feck (one
of our directors) in the amount of $48,507.29 to evidence the our indebtedness
to Mr. Feck for his payment of $48,507.29 of the Company's expenses. Mr. Feck
paid these Company expenses between March 13, 2009 until September 15, 2009.
These expenses included salaries, consulting fees, labor, legal fees for
formation of the Company, legal and filing fees related to patents, travel
expenses and the electric bills on our Corona, California warehouse facility.
The Convertible Note issued to Mr. Feck had an interest rate of Prime Rate (as
quoted in the Wall Street Journal) plus 2% per annum. On December 1, 2009, Mr.
Feck elected to convert this note into 200,000 shares of our common stock.

SUB-TOTAL: 5,400,000 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred
stock outstanding after this issuance.

On November 5, 2009, we issued a Convertible Note in the principal amount
of $73,788 to Terry Adams, the son of George Adams, Sr., to evidence monies
loaned to us. The Convertible Note is due on or before December 15, 2012, bears
interest at the rate of Prime Rate (as quoted in the Wall Street Journal) plus
2% per annum and is convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion
rate of one share per $.25 of outstanding principal and interest. No portion of
the Convertible Note has been converted into shares of our common stock.

SUB-TOTAL: 5,400,000 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred
stock outstanding after this issuance.

Our board of directors granted anti-dilution rights to Jeffrey Brain,
iCapital Finance, Inc. (a company owned by Randall Letcavage, our Chief
Executive Officer, and his business partner, Rosemary Nguyen), Randall Letcavage
and David E. Wise, our securities counsel. These anti-dilution rights entitled
Jeffrey Brain, iCapital Finance, Inc., Randall Letcavage and David E. Wise to
acquire additional shares of our common stock at $.25 per share in order to
maintain their original percentage ownership in the our common stock.
Consequently, we issued as compensation and for services rendered the following
anti-dilution shares in January 2010:

Name of Recipient Number of Shares Value of Shares
----------------- ---------------- ---------------
Jeffry Brain 94,118 $23,529
iCapital Finance, Inc. 70,588 $17,647
Randall Letcavage 117,647 $29,412
David E. Wise 70,588 $17,647

SUB-TOTAL: 5,752,941 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred
stock outstanding after this issuance.

In January 2010, we issued (i) 120,000 shares of our common stock to
Bayport Holding Company, LLC, the personal holding company of Jeffrey Brain, our
Chief Financial Officer, as $30,000 in aggregate compensation (at $.25 per

II-3

share) accrued $3,000 per month from March through December 2009; and (ii)
119,505 shares of our common stock to Bayport Holding Company, LLC as bonus
compensation due to Mr. Brain in the amount of $29,876.

SUB-TOTAL: 5,992,446 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred
stock outstanding after this issuance.

In January 2010, we issued 120,000 shares of our common stock to Randall
Letcavage, our Chief Executive Officer, as $30,000 in aggregate compensation (at
$.25 per share) accrued $3,000 per month from March through December 2009.

SUB-TOTAL: 6,112,446 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred
stock outstanding after this issuance.

The above shares were issued in reliance of the exemption from registration
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("33 Act"), provided by
Section 4(2) promulgated thereunder, as the issuance of the stock did not
involve a public offering of securities. In connection with the above stock
issuances, the offers and sales were made to a limited number of persons, all of
whom were accredited investors, friends, family or business associates of the
Company and its management and shareholders; transfer of the securities was
restricted by the Company within the requirements of the 33 Act, since all
certificates representing such securities bear a restrictive legend and
appropriate stop transfer instructions are maintained in the stock records of
the Company; there was no general solicitation of investors or advertising
associated with the above offers and sales; and no underwriters were involved in
such offers and sales. In addition to various representations made to us by such
persons, we have made independent determinations that such persons were
accredited or sophisticated investors and that they were capable of analyzing
the merits and risks of their investment in our securities and that they
understood that the speculative nature of their investment.

Between April 30, 2009, and January 15, 2010, we issued an aggregate
5,200,000 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cash consideration of
$1,300,000 (or $.25 per share) to 110 investors.

SUB-TOTAL: 11,312,446 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred
stock outstanding after this issuance.

Between August 1, 2010, and August 15, 2011, we issued an aggregate of
2,995,121 shares of restricted common stock for conversion of debt at $.25 per
share and for sales of stock at $.50 per share.

SUB-TOTAL: 14,307,567 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred
stock outstanding after these issuances.

The above shares were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration
requirements of the 33 Act provided by Regulation D, Rule 506 promulgated
thereunder, as the issuance of the stock did not involve a public offering of
securities based on the following:

* the investors represented to us that they were acquiring the
securities for their own account for investment and not for the
account of any other person and not with a view to or for
distribution, assignment or resale in connection with any distribution
within the meaning of the 33 Act;

* we provided each investor with written disclosure prior to sale that
the securities have not been registered under the 33 Act and,
therefore, cannot be resold unless they are registered under the 33
Act or unless an exemption from registration is available;

II-4

* the investors agreed not to sell or otherwise transfer the purchased
securities unless they are registered under the 33 Act and any
applicable state laws, or an exemption or exemptions from such
registration are available;

* each investor had knowledge and experience in financial and other
business matters such that he, she or it was capable of evaluating the
merits and risks of an investment in us;

* each investor was given information and access to all of our
documents, records, books, officers and directors, our executive
offices in Irvine, California and our warehouse facility in Corona,
California, pertaining to the investment and was provided the
opportunity to ask questions and receive answers regarding the terms
and conditions of the offering and to obtain any additional
information that we possesses or were able to acquire without
unreasonable effort and expense;

* each investor had no need for liquidity in their investment in us and
could afford the complete loss of their investment in us;

* we did not employ any advertisement, article, notice or other
communication published in any newspaper, magazine or similar media or
broadcast over television or radio;

* we did not conduct, hold or participate in any seminar or meeting
whose attendees had been invited by any general solicitation or
general advertising;

* we placed a legend on each certificate or other document that
evidences the securities stating that the securities have not been
registered under the 33 Act and setting forth or referring to the
restrictions on transferability and sale of the securities;

* we placed stop transfer instructions in our stock transfer records;

* we sold securities to less than 35 individuals who were not
"accredited investors" as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D
promulgated under the 33 Act;

* no underwriter was involved in the offering and the only registered
broker-dealers involved in the offering were Marquis Financial
Services to whom we paid commissions in the amount of $6,500 (equal to
10% of the $65,000 raised by Marquis Financial Services in our first
private offering) and Dave Broderick of WBB Securities to whom we paid
$31,938 (equal to 10% of the $319,380 raised by Dave Broderick in our
second private offering); and

* we made independent determinations that such persons were
sophisticated or accredited investors and that they were capable of
analyzing the merits and risks of their investment in us, that they
understood the speculative nature of their investment in us and that
they could lose their entire investment in us.

II-5

ITEM 16. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No. Description
----------- -----------

3(i).1* Articles of Incorporation of Ciralight West, Inc. filed February 26,
2009, with the Secretary of State of Nevada

3(i).2* Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation filed on
March 13, 2009, with the Secretary of State of Nevada (changing name
to Ciralight Global, Inc.).

3(i).3* Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation filed on
April 22, 2009, with the Secretary of State of Nevada.

3(ii)* By-Laws of Ciralight Global, Inc.

4.1* $250,000 Prime Rate Plus 2% Convertible Note Due 2012 payable to
George Adams, Sr.

4.2* Certificate of Designation of Series A Preferred Stock filed on July
22, 2009, with the Secretary of State of Nevada

4.3* Ciralight Global, Inc. Certificate of Common Stock (Specimen)

4.4* $48,507.29 Prime Rate Plus 2% Convertible Note Due 2012 payable to
Frederick Feck

4.5* $73,788.00 Prime Rate Plus 2% Convertible Note Due 2012 payable to
Terry Adams

4.6* Stock Subscription Agreement (unsigned and undated prototype)

5.1** Opinion of David E. Wise, Esq., Attorney at Law

10.1* Exchange of Stock for Assets Agreement dated as of April 1, 2009, by
and between Ciralight Global, Inc. and George Adams, Sr.

10.2* Amendment to Exchange of Stock for Assets Agreement by and between
Ciralight Global, Inc. and George Adams, Sr. dated December 15, 2009.

10.3* Assignment of Issued United States Patent and Pending United States
Patent Application dated December 17, 2009

10.4* Domestic Non-Exclusive Dealer Agreement (undated and unsigned
prototype)

10.5* Domestic Non-Exclusive Distribution Agreement (undated and unsigned
prototype)

10.6* Domestic Non-Exclusive Dealer Agreement by and between Ciralight
Global, Inc. and Globalight Energy Solutions, LLC dated as of
December 1, 2009

10.7* Domestic Non-Exclusive Dealer Agreement by and between Ciralight
Global, Inc. and Chaparral Green Energy Solutions, LLC dated as of
January 1, 2010

10.8* Promissory Note in the principal amount of $69,865.00 dated January
15, 2010 from Randall Letcavage payable to Ciralight Global, Inc.

II-6

10.9* Assumption of the Financial Consulting Agreement - Memorandum of
Understanding by and between Ciralight Global, Inc. and iCapital
Finance, Inc. dated April 20,2009

10.10* Promissory Note and Security Agreement in the principal amount of
$69,865 dated March 20, 2010 from Randall Letcavage payable to
Ciralight Global, Inc. (in replacement of Promissory Note attached as
Exhibit 10.8).

10.11* Domestic Non-Exclusive Dealer Agreement dated December 1, 2009, by
and between Ciralight Global, Inc. and Green Tech Design-Build, Inc.

10.12* International Distribution Agreement dated January 15, 2010, by and
between Ciralight Global, Inc. and ZEEV Shimon & Sons, Ltd.

10.13* International Dealership Agreement dated June 18, 2009, by and
between Ciralight Global, Inc. and RSB Construction LTD.

10.14* Domestic Non-Exclusive Dealer Agreement dated April 1, 2010, by and
between Ciralight Global, Inc. and J-MACS Consulting, LLC.

10.15* Domestic Non-Exclusive Dealer Agreement dated April 15, 2010, by and
between Ciralight Global, Inc. and The Energy Solutions Group
Worldwide, LLC.

10.16* Domestic Non-Exclusive Dealer Agreement dated April 15, 2010, by and
between Ciralight Global, Inc. and Kemper & Associates, Inc., d/b/a
Total Roofing & Reconstruction.

10.17* Domestic Non-Exclusive Dealer Agreement dated December 1, 2009, by
and between Ciralight Global, Inc. and Eco-Smart, Inc.

10.18* Commercial Lease Agreement dated April 1, 2010, by and between
Ciralight Global, Inc. and Frederick Feck.

10.19* Material Liability Agreement dated September 3, 2009, by and between
Ciralight Global, Inc. and Suntron Corporation.

10.20* Material Terms and Conditions of Verbal Office Lease for Executive
Offices in Irvine, California.

10.21* Material Terms and Conditions of Verbal Office Lease for
Warehouse/Offices in Corona, California

14* Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

21* Subsidiaries.

23.1** Consent of David E. Wise, Esq. (contained in Exhibit 5.1)

23.2** Consent of HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP

24.1* Power of Attorney (included in signature page).

----------
* Previously filed.
** Filed herewith.

The exhibits are not part of the prospectus and will not be distributed
with the prospectus, unless requested by the selling shareholders.

II-7

ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS

We hereby undertake the following:

1. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities
Act may be available to directors, officers and controlling persons of the
Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant
has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against
such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred
and paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered hereby, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the
matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by
the final adjudication of such issue.

2. a. To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a
post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

(i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended;

(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the
effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent
post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the
aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth
in this registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any
increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total
dollar value of the securities offered would not exceed that which was
registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the
estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of a
prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the
Securities Act if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price
represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering
price set forth in the "Calculation of Registration Fee" table in the
effective registration statement; and

(iii)To include any material information with respect to the plan of
distribution not previously disclosed in this registration statement
or any material change to such information in the registration
statement.

3. That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities
Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of the
securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering
thereof.

4. File a post-effective amendment to remove from registration any of the
securities being registered that remain unsold at the end of the offering.

5. Each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration
statement relating to an offering shall be deemed to be part of and included in
the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness,
provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or
prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document
incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement
or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser
with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any
statement that was made in the registrations statement or prospectus that was
part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately
prior to such date of first use.

II-8

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, the Registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that
it meets all of the requirements of filing on Form S-1 and has duly caused this
Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City
of Sherman Oaks, State of California, on the 22nd day of November, 2011.

Ciralight Global, Inc.

By: /s/ Jeffrey S. Brain
-------------------------------------
Jeffrey S. Brain
President and Chief Executive Officer

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, this Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form
S-1 has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.

Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----

/s/ Jeffrey S. Brain President November 22, 2011
------------------------------ Chief Executive Officer
Jeffrey S. Brain (Principal Executive Officer)
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Director

/s/ Frederick Feck Corporate Secretary and Director November 22, 2011
------------------------------
Frederick Feck

II-9